alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Manakoa Services Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
      of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.







Date:
              May
              19, 2006
            
            
            Date:
              May
              19, 2006/s/ James
              C.
              Katzaroff
            
            
            /s/ Debra
              KasparekJames
              C.
              Katzaroff
              C.E.O.
              (Principle
                Executive Officer)
            
            
            Debra
              KasparekTitle
              Interim-Chief
                Financial Officer
              (Principle
                Financial Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Manakoa Services Corporation and will
      be
      retained by Manakoa Services Corporation, and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

PATRICK RAMSEY, : 

Plaintiff, : 

vs. : 

 CIVIL ACTION 05-0424-M

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, : 

Commissioner of

Social Security, : 

Defendant. : 

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT be

entered in favor of Defendant Jo Anne B. Barnhart and against

Plaintiff Patrick Ramsey.

DONE this 25th day of January, 2006.

s/BERT W. MILLING, JR. 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00424-M Document 22 Filed 01/25/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30165]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-85,483A]


SMC Electrical Products, Inc., Subsidiary of Becker Mining 
America, Inc., Including On-Site Leased Workers From Bristol Computer 
Services and Kelly Services, Delta, Colorado; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on September 25, 2014, applicable to workers of SMC Electrical 
Products, Inc., a subsidiary of Becker Mining America, Inc., including 
on-site leased workers from Bristol Computer Services and Kelly 
Services, Barboursville, West Virginia (TA-W-85,483). The Department's 
Notice of Determination was published in the Federal Register on 
September 11, 2014 (79 FR 54291).
    At the request of a petitioning union official, the Department 
reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The firm is 
engaged in the production of electrical power control systems.
    The investigation confirmed that worker separations at SMC 
Electrical Products, Inc., a subsidiary of Becker Mining America, Inc., 
including on-site leased workers from Bristol Computer Services and 
Kelly Services, Barboursville, West Virginia (TA-W-85,483) are 
attributable to increased imports of electrical power control systems, 
as are worker separations at the Delta, Colorado facility.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-85,483 and TA-W-85,483A is 
hereby issued as follows:

All workers of SMC Electrical Products, Inc., a subsidiary of Becker 
Mining America, Inc., including on-site leased workers from Bristol 
Computer Services and Kelly Services, Barboursville, West Virginia 
(TA-W-85,483) and SMC Electrical Products, Inc., a subsidiary of 
Becker Mining America, Inc., including on-site leased workers from 
Bristol Computer Services and Kelly Services, Delta, Colorado (TA-W-
85,483A) who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after August 13, 2013 through September 26, 2016 are eligible 
to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of 
the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, and are also eligible to apply 
for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the 
Trade Act of 1974, as amended.


    Signed in Washington, DC, this 8th day of December, 2014.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014-30165 Filed 12-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### SOCIETY FOR the PREVENTION OF TRADEMARK ABUSE (substituted for Central Mfg. Co.), Appellee, v. DREAMWORKS LLC and Dreamworks Animation LLC, Appellees, v. Leo Stoller, Appellant.

No. 2007-1584.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 11, 2007.

Leo Stoller, pro se.

Before RADER, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

*Leo*Stoller moves *for*a stay and moves leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse (SPTA) moves to dismiss. Stoller moves to suspend proceedings pending resolution of his motion for a stay and pending resolution of an attorney misconduct complaint Stoller filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

SPTA states that Stoller is a bankruptcy debtor in proceedings before the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois. SPTA states that the bankruptcy trustee in that proceeding, with the approval of the bankruptcy court, assigned Stoller’s claims relating to pending Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) proceedings, including the TTAB proceeding underlying this appeal, to SPTA. Thus, SPTA argues, Stoller cannot bring this appeal. Stoller does not contest SPTA’s assertion that the bankruptcy assignment transferred his right to pursue this appeal to SPTA. Under these circumstances, the court agrees that this appeal should be dismissed. Because the court dismisses the appeal, Stoller’s motions are moot.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.

(3) All pending motions are moot.
KMT 6.30.2015 10K Ex 10.17






                                            
Exhibit 10.17




SCHEDULE OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO HAVE ENTERED INTO THE FORM OF OFFICER'S EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT 10.16
Each of the following Named Executive Officers has entered into a Form of Employment Agreement: 
NAME 
Martha Fusco
Exhibit
32(d)


CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


FOR PPL
ENERGY SUPPLY, LLC'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Energy Supply, LLC (the
"Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I,
the principal financial officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that:





·
    The
      Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and·
    The
      information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.











Date:
      November 3, 2005
    /s/ Paul
      A.
      Farr
      Paul
      A. Farr
      Vice
      President and Controller
      PPL
      Energy Supply, LLC





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

s0831 

# Order

September 11, 2009

138365

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138365 COA: 287444 Wayne CC: 04-005837 DONALD EDWARD STEWART, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 30, 2009 order of the Court of Appeal s is considered, and it is DE NIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
Orange Cryostat User Manual

Cryostat Wiring

 Connection Function 

K I+ 

L IN V+ 

P VSilicon Diode DT-470 or SI 410 

Calibrated from 1.4 to 300 K 

Use for control 

M Heater I+ 

A Heater IPrimary Heater 

normally 50 Ω

B Valve Htr I+ 

C Valve Htr IValve Heater 

Requires special attachment 

Operation

 Temperature is controlled using the cold and warm valves and the heater. The 

cold and warm valves control the flow of helium into (cold) and out of (warm) the 

annulus, which surrounds the sample space and is in thermal contact with it and with the 

sample through the exchange gas. The most efficient way to operate the cryostat, in 

terms of helium use, is to have the cold and warm valves slightly open and control 

temperatures above 4.2 K using the heater. 

 It is also possible to operate the cryostat below 4.2 K, the normal boiling point of 

helium, by pumping on the annulus with a large rough pump. To do this, close the warm 

valve and either close the cold valve or keep it very slightly open. Connect the rough 

pump to the annulus pumping port, turn on the pump, and open the port. Using this 

method, a base temperature of about 1.5 K can be reached. 

Refilling Cryogens

 Both the helium and nitrogen reservoirs have to be refilled periodically. 

Typically the nitrogen holds for one day while the helium lasts for between 1.5 and 2 

days. This figure can vary dramatically, however, depending on how the cryostat is 

being used and what condition it is in, so you should monitor the helium level using the 

helium level sensor. It is very important that the cryostat not be allowed to run without 

helium, because if it does there is a very high probability that ice will form inside, 

making the cryostat unusable until it can be warmed up and dried out. If you are unsure 

about how to refill cryogens, consult the instructions entitled “How to Fill with Liquid 

Helium” or ask a member of the sample environment team. 

Changing Samples

 The sample you want to change to should be mounted on a new sample stick and 

ready to go before you begin. Connect a helium gas bottle with a pressure around 5 psi to 

the nipple above the blue three way valve with a rubber hose and turn the three way valve 

up. This pushes helium through the sample well, keeping air out. Unscrew the sample 

stick, pull it out, put the new sample stick in, and screw it down. This should be done as 

quickly as possible to keep air out of the sample well. After you are done, close the three 

way valve and disconnect the helium. 

8/21/02
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice
 On December 22, 2014, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed consent decree between the United States and Robert G. Schory, III with the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division, in a case entitled 
                    *United States*
                     v. 
                    *Boulos Family Properties, LLC, et al,*
                     No. 2:14-cv-059. The proposed consent decree resolves claims for response costs under Section 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9607, against Robert G. Schory, III, in connection with the National Petroleum Packers Site, a former glycol reprocessing facility in Stallings, North Carolina. Under the proposed consent decree, Mr. Schory will pay $1,500 in exchange for a covenant not to sue for the Site from the United States, conditioned on the accuracy of certain representations he made about his financial condition. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to 
                    *United States*
                     v. 
                    *Boulos Family Properties, LLC, et al,*
                     DJ. Ref. No. # 90-11-3-10947. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: To submit 
                             comments:
Send them to:By e-mail
*pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov*.By mail
Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ-ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
 During the public comment period, the consent decree may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department Web site: 
                    *http://www.usdoj.gov/​enrd/​Consent_​Decrees.html.*
                     We will provide a paper copy of the consent decree upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ-ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. Please enclose a check or money order for $6.00 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. Henry S. Friedman, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.


[FR Doc. 2014-30629 Filed 12-30-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-30862, 333-47002, 333-47008, 333-48430,
333-75710 and 333-75712) and Form S-3 (No. 333-60350) of Choice One
Communications Inc. of our report dated March 27, 2003 relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which
appears in this Form 10-K.


/S/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
-------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Rochester, New York
March 31, 2003
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- ) ) T&A Screw Machine Products, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. Wl5QKN-ll-D-0201 ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT:
APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 58998

Mr. Mark Drouin

President Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney MAJ Lawrence P. Gilbert, JA

Trial Attorney DISMISSAL ORDER On 6 November 2014, the parties informed the Board that they had reached a settlement in principle. On 16 January 2015, appellant informed the Boardthat it wished to withdraw the appeal, requesting dismissal with prejudice. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 22 January 2015

Administr tive Judge Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58998, Appeal ofT&A Screw Machine Products, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6748
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MALE LEWIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR92-301-S, CA-97-1380-S) Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Male Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Brent Jefferson Gurney, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lewis , Nos. CR-92-301-S; CA-97-1380-S (D. Md. Apr. 30, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          10,831
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,135
<ALLOWANCES>                                       160
<INVENTORY>                                      9,405
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,885
<PP&E>                                          11,909
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,714
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,720
<BONDS>                                          5,174
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            76
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,134
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,307
<SALES>                                         23,825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,825
<CGS>                                           13,866
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,866
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,933
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 229
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (67)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (94)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 27
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        27
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 29, 2017

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-2932

Lower Tribunal No. 16-16940

________________



### Kahena Kristine Gallerani

,

Appellant,

vs.



### Cristiano Piquet

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Reemberto

Diaz

, Judge.

Jason B. Giller, P.A., and Tricia Neimand; Keith D. Silverstein

, for

appellant.

Michael Lascelle, P.A., and Jeffrey Greenhaus

, for appellee.

Before SALTER, EMAS, and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.“Valid prenuptial agreements regarding post-dissolution support are

contracts.” Lashkajani v. Lashkajani

, 911 So. 2d 1154, 1158 (Fla. 2005). Because

courts have recently enforced similar provisions, see Weymouth v. Weymouth

, 87

So. 3d 30, 32 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), we reverse the trial judge’s determination that

the provision of the prenuptial agreement at issue is void against Florida’s public

policy, hold that Ms. Gallerani has met the conditions of that provision, and

remand for entry of a revised final judgment of dissolution of marriage ratifying,

incorporating, and enforcing the prenuptial agreement including the provision at

issue.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

2
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sycamore Networks, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending
July 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel E. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    DANIEL E. SMITH               
|Daniel E. Smith                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|October 11, 2005