alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Exhibit 32 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certifications of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers

The following statement is
being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), which carries with it certain criminal penalties in the event of a knowing or willful
misrepresentation.

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20549

Re: Andrew Corporation

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In accordance with
the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC 1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | (i) | this Current Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Andrew Corporation.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated as of this 9th day of May 2006.

|                                                      |  |  |  |                                          
|----------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
|                                                      |  | 
|/s/ Ralph E. Faison                                   |  |  |  | /s/ Marty R. Kittrell                    
|Ralph E. Faison President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Marty R. Kittrell Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this certification has been provided to Andrew Corporation and will be retained by Andrew
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



30
EXHIBIT 10.9

                            SEMICAR TECHNOLOGY CORP.
             2F, No. 218, SEC 3, TA-TUNG ROAD, SHIJR, TAIPEI, TAIWAN
                   Tel. +886 2-2648.2046 Fax: +886-2-2648.2083
         Email: semtech@ms24.hinet.net Web Site: http://www.semdicar.com

                                                             Date: Mar. 14, 2000

                                CERTFICATED FORM

               (Expiry period: 180 days since the date of issued)

To:      RocTech (HK) Ltd.
         35th Floor, Central Plaza
         18 Harbour Road, Hong Kong

Attn:    Mr. Patrick Rocillo

Subject: To our portable hands-free
         Model #HP-7110-JS/J80/N Series

This is to certify that the above mentioned model is an open model. In case we
would granted any exclusive agreement with our other customers in future in
other countries, it would not affect the purchase right of RocTech (HK) Ltd.

Roc Tech (HK) Ltd. is authorized to purchase the above mentioned model through
Semdicar Technology Corp. directly.

Should you have any further inquiry, please feel free to contact with our
office.

Best regards,

Semdicar Technology Corp.

For and on behalf of
Semdicar Technology Corporation
/s/ authorized signature
-------------------------------
Authorized Signature


                                                                              47
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the year ended November 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kevin M. McMullenKevin M. McMullenChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President/s/ Michael E. HicksMichael E. HicksSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Treasurer


Date: March 31, 2006

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document
UNITED STAT ES DIS TRICT COURT F OR THE D ISTRIC T OF CO LU M BIA

MOHAMM ED AL-ADAHI, e t al . , :

: P e ti ti one r s, :

: v. : Ci vi l A cti on No. 05 -28 0 (GK) : BARACK

H. OBAMA, e t al

. , :

: Re spo nde nt s. :

OR DE R To ensure that the Guantana mo Re view Task For ce operating pursuant to Ex ecutive O rder 13,492 has not made a

ny rec ommendations -- a

nd the Review Pane l in connec tion with the same ha s made no decision -- that would rende r unnece ssary or otherwise ineffic ient the further expenditure of judicial and pa

rty resour ces in this matter, it is here by OR DE RE D , that on or bef

ore July 20, 2009 , in

the a bo ve -c a pti on e d c a se , Re sp on de nts sh a ll fi le wi th t he Court e

xpa rtea nd un de r s e a l a re po rt de ta ili ng the c ur re nt status of

the Gu anta

namo Review Ta sk Forc e re view proc ess with respe ct to eac h Petitioner. The repor t sha ll infor

m the Court as to whethe r the Gua

ntanamo Revie w T as kFor ce ha s made a ny rec ommendations reg ardingthe dispositi on of Petitioner. I f a r ecommendation reg ardingthe disposition of Pe titioner has bee n made, the re po rt sh a ll a lso a dd

re ss wh e the r the Re vie w Pane l ha s ma de any de c isi on s in

c on ne c tio n w ith the re commendation. I f no rec ommendation has bee n made, the r eport shall provide an estimated timetable, base d on the then-a vailable infor

mation, for that re commendation; and it is further-2-

OR DE RE D , th a t Re sp on de nts sh a ll b e un de r a n a ff ir ma tiv e and

on g oin g ob lig a tio n to imm e diate ly

no tif y the Court

of any c ha ng e s to Pe tit ion e r’ s st a tus

.

July 8, 20 09 /s/ Glady s Kessler Un i t edS t at es Di s t ri ct J u d ge Copies via ECF t o all couns el of recor d
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2226 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, 

Commission on Fine Arts, National Capital Arts and Cultural Affairs 

for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, Commission on Fine Arts, National Capital Arts and Cultural Affairs for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 RELATED AGENCIES, COMMISSION ON FINE 

5 ARTS, NATIONAL CAPITAL ARTS AND CUL6 TURAL AFFAIRS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Related Agencies, Commission on Fine Arts, NaVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:52 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2226.IH H2226

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2226 IH

1 tional Capital Arts and Cultural Affairs for fiscal year 

2 2024 may not exceed $2,750,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ALEX WHITE, :

 Petitioner, : 

 CIVIL ACTION 16-00365-KD-M

v. :

 CRIMINAL ACTION 15-00138-KD-M

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, :

 Respondent. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, 

and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of 

the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is 

adopted as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate (Doc. 50) 

be DENIED, that this action be DISMISSED, and that any 

certificate of appealability filed by Petitioner be DENIED as he 

is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.

DONE this _______ day of _____________________, 2016.

 ___________________________________

 KRISTI K. DuBOSE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cr-00138-KD-M Document 55 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ALEX WHITE, :

 Petitioner, : 

 CIVIL ACTION 16-00365-KD-M

v. :

 CRIMINAL ACTION 15-00138-KD-M

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, :

 Respondent. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, 

and a de novo determination of those portions of the 

Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of 

the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is 

adopted as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate (Doc. 50) 

be DENIED, that this action be DISMISSED, and that any 

certificate of appealability filed by Petitioner be DENIED as he 

is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.

DONE this _______ day of _____________________, 2016.

________________________________

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cr-00138-KD-M Document 55 Filed 11/14/16 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2307 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2307

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
 State, Administration of Foreign Affairs, Repatriations Loans Program 
       Account, Subsidize Gross Obligations for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
 State, Administration of Foreign Affairs, Repatriations Loans Program 
       Account, Subsidize Gross Obligations for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 
              ADMINISTRATION OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, REPATRIATIONS LOANS 
              PROGRAM ACCOUNT, SUBSIDIZE GROSS OBLIGATIONS FOR FISCAL 
              YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of State, 
Administration of Foreign Affairs, Repatriations Loans Program Account, 
Subsidize Gross Obligations for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 
$4,937,742.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2249 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2249

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
of Agriculture, Agriculutral Research Service, Buildings and Facilities 
                         for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
of Agriculture, Agriculutral Research Service, Buildings and Facilities 
                         for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR US DEPARTMENT OF 
              AGRICULTURE, AGRICULUTRAL RESEARCH SERVICE, BUILDINGS AND 
              FACILITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

     Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for US Department of 
Agriculture, Agriculutral Research Service, Buildings and Facilities 
for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $127,805,000.
                                 <all>
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 13, 2009

s1110 

# Order

November 13, 2009

138976

ANN COBLENTZ, LEE COBLENTZ, JOHN LEWANDOWSKI, and DEBORAH LEWANDOWSKI, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 138976 COA: 290075 Oakland CC: 03-046760-CZ CITY OF NOVI, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00018-CV

KAREN ENDSLEY, BRAD ENDSLEY, AND ENDSLEY ELECTRIC, INC. D/B/A 

INDUSTRIAL POWER SYSTEMS, INC., Appellants

V.

MILLER, JAMES, MILLER & HORNSBY, L.L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12C1571-CCL

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Karen Endsley, Brad Endsley, and Endsley Electric, Inc. d/b/a Industrial Power Systems, 

Inc., appellants, filed their notice of appeal March 8, 2013. The reporter’s record was filed 

March 19, and the clerk’s record was filed March 26, making appellants’ brief due April 25.

When neither a brief nor a motion to extend time for filing same were received by 

May 15, our clerk’s office contacted appellants by letter, extended the deadline for filing their 

brief to May 30, and warned them that failure to file the brief by May 30 would subject their 

appeal to dismissal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). On May 30, Karen 

Endsley called our clerk’s office and stated that she had been working on the brief, which she 

claimed was almost complete, and requested that she be given a few more days—until June 3—

to complete and file appellants’ brief. Endsley’s request was granted, and she appeared in person 

at our clerk’s office on June 3; however, rather than file the brief as she had stated she would, 

Endsley filed a motion for an extension of time. The motion was granted, and the deadline for 

filing appellants’ brief was extended to June 25.

The June 25 deadline came and went, and still no brief from the appellants. 

Consequently, our clerk’s office sent appellants a second notice informing them that their brief 

was, once again, late and directing them to file a brief on or before July 29, 2013, should they 

still desire to prosecute this appeal. Further, the notice warned appellants that their failure to file 

a brief on or before July 29 would subject the appeal to dismissal for want of prosecution. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
3

On July 29, 2013, Endsley once again contacted our clerk’s office and stated that she had 

completed the brief but that she lost it during a recent power outage. She indicated that she was 

working on reproducing the brief and was optimistic that she could hand deliver it to the clerk’s 

office on July 30. It is now August 14, and we have received neither the appellants’ brief nor a 

request for an extension of the briefing deadline.

Pursuant to Rule 42.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss this appeal 

for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: August 14, 2013

Date Decided: August 15, 2013
----

Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In condition with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter endedJuly 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), I, George G. Usher, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company. 

By /s/ George G. Usher George G. Usher, Chief Executive Officer September 14, 2007 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

KYLE ROGERS,

Petitioner

v.

UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 811 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of May, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Anthony J. Fidaleo, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of AdStar, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: September 28, 2005   /s/ Anthony J. Fidaleo   Anthony J. Fidaleo   Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

TRENNIS WADE CHAPMAN, SR., :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 07-00795-WS-B

LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,:

et al.,

:

Defendants.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this

file deemed relevant to the issue raised, and there having been no

objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion

of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby

DISMISSED with prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon

which relief may be granted. 

DONE this 12th day of May, 2010.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:07-cv-00795-WS-B Document 23 Filed 05/12/10 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DALLAS COUNTY, ALABAMA, : 

et al., : 

: 

Plaintiffs, : 

: 

v. : CIVIL ACTION 05-0350-M

: 

THE CITY OF SELMA, ALABAMA, : 

: 

Defendant. : 

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be

DISMISSED as this Court lacks jurisdiction over the matters

presented herein.

DONE this 24th day of February, 2006.

s/BERT W. MILLING, JR. 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00350-M Document 60 Filed 02/24/06 Page 1 of 1