alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 192 

To prohibit individuals who are not citizens of the United States from voting 

in elections in the District of Columbia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. PFLUGER (for himself, Mr. ELLZEY, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. BABIN, and Mrs. 

GREENE of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To prohibit individuals who are not citizens of the United 

States from voting in elections in the District of Columbia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITING VOTING BY NONCITIZENS IN 

4 ELECTIONS IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. 

5 An individual who is not a citizen of the United 

6 States may not vote in an election for public office in the 

7 District of Columbia or in any ballot initiative or ref8 erendum in the District of Columbia. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.11 Letter Agreement-Warrants





Northsight Capital, Inc.

7740 East Evans Rd.

Scottsdale, AZ 85260







Sandor Capital Master Fund

May 15, 2015

2828 Routh St.

Dallas, TX 75201




RE: Loan to Kae Yong Park and Howard R. Baer/Issuance of Warrants




Ladies and Gentlemen:




Sandor Capital Master Fund (or its designee) (“Sandor”) is willing to loan Kae Yong Park and Howard R. Baer (collectively, “Lender”) an aggregate of $300,000, in two tranches, the first of which will be $100,000 and the second of which will be $200,000. Lender is willing to advance to the Company a minimum of $200,000, subject to Lender’s receipt of funding from Sandor. 




The Lender is pledging 55,000,000 shares of Company common stock to Sandor to secure its repayment to Sandor of the $300,000 advanced. 




In consideration of Sandor lending $300,000 to Lender and Lender’s loan to the Company, the Company agrees to issue Sandor (or his designee) a warrant to purchase 2,000,000 shares of Company common stock at an exercise price of $.05 per share for a term of two years. This warrant will be issued promptly upon Sandor’s completing the $300,000 advance to the Lender.




If the Company is unable to pay $300,000 back to the Lender on or before the maturity date of Lender’s promissory note to Sandor (sixty day note), Sandor has agreed to automatically extend the maturity date of such promissory note an additional thirty days to ninety days, in consideration for which the Company shall issue him warrants to purchase an additional 1,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.05 per share for a term of two years. This warrant will be issued promptly following the automatic extension of Lender’s Note to Sandor in accordance with the terms of the Note.

 




[Intentionally Left Blank]







The signatories hereto, intending to be legally bound, have executed this agreement as an instrument under seal as of the date hereof.




NORTHSIGHT CAPITAL INC.




S/John Bluher                                            

By: John Bluher, CEO




ACCEPTED AND AGREED:




Sandor Capital Master Fund




S/John Lemak                                            

John Lemak, Manager
Exhibit 10.2

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                            FOLLOWING PROMISSORY NOTE
         PROMISSORY NOTE - BETWEEN GLOBAL NEWS NETWORK AND PETER LAMBERT

                              DATED: MARCH 17, 2015

     This instrument executed this 12th day of June, 2015 is the First Amendment
to the above referenced Promissory:

1. The subject Promissory Note was to be paid on or about June 17, 2015 to Peter
Lambert.  However,  investments  funds  did  not  arrive  on the  planned  date;
therefore the parties agree that said promissory note shall be extended and will
accrue interest at $55.55 per day until this note is paid in full.

2.  In  all  other  respects,  the  Promissory  Note  is  hereby  confirmed  and
republished.  Both  parties  have  read,  understand  and  agree  to  the  above
referenced changes to the subject Promissory Note referenced.

     EXECUTED at San Diego County, California, on June 12, 2015.


                                      /s/ John Fleming
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      GLOBAL NEWS NETWORK, INC.
                                      By: John Fleming, CEO


                                      /s/ Peter Lambert
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      PETER LAMBERT, Individually
Order filed November 7, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00779

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF E .E., N.E., A.E. AND E.E., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the Brown County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DV1302041



### O R D E R
Appellant R.A.E.’s brief was due October 28, 2019

. No brief or motion for
extension of time has been filed.
Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before December 2, 2019
, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.
tse_EX_10-4


		
			Exhibit 10.4
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Trinseo LLC

				
	
					
						1000 Chesterbrook Blvd.

				
	
					
						Suite 300

				
	
					
						Berwyn, PA 19312

				



		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			May 11, 2015
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Ms. Marilyn Horner
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Dear Ms. Horner:
		

		
			 
		

		
			RE:  Definition of Retirement for Purposes of Equity Awards under 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			This letter confirms that the following definition of "Retirement” is applicable to the Stock Options granted to you on February 27, 2015:
		

		
			 
		

		
			"Retirement” means a retirement from active Employment after the Optionee has attained age fifty-five (55) with at least six (6) years of continuous service with the Company.
		

		
			 
		

		
			This letter confirms that the following definition of "Retirement" is applicable to the Restricted Stock
		

		
			Units granted to you on February 27, 2015:
		

		
			 
		

		
			"Retirement" means a retirement from active Employment after the Grantee has attained age fifty-five (55) with at least six (6) years of continuous service with the Company.
		

		
			 
		

		
			**
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						Trinseo S.A.

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						By:

					
					
						  

					
					
						/s/ Christopher D. Pappas

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Name: Christopher D. Pappas

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Title: Chief Executive Officer and President
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as President and Chief Executive Officer of BTU International, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 29, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the
Report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Paul J. van der WansemPaul J. van der WansemPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (principal executive officer)


Dated: August 8, 2008
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 10824 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ANTHONY DEWAYNE GALLOWAY
,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:13

- CR

- 504

- 1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Anthony Dewayne Galloway has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Galloway h a s not filed a re sponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
June 16 , 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-10824 Document: 00513080086 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015No. 14

- 10824

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withd raw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-10824 Document: 00513080086 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2171 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2171

     To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. 
    Department of Interior, United States Geologic Service, Surveys 
           Investigations, and Research for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. 
    Department of Interior, United States Geologic Service, Surveys 
           Investigations, and Research for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR U.S. DEPARTMENT OF 
              INTERIOR, UNITED STATES GEOLOGIC SERVICE, SURVEYS 
              INVESTIGATIONS, AND RESEARCH FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for U.S. Department of 
Interior, United States Geologic Service, Surveys Investigations, and 
Research for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $1,160,596,000.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

RALPH RUSSELL MARTIN, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 05-0069-WS-B

DALLAS COUNTY PROBATE COURT, :

et al.,

:

Defendants.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this

file deemed relevant to the issue raised, and there having been

no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of

this Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint be and is

hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

DONE this 16th day of August, 2005.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00069-WS-B Document 6 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.1



IPVoice Communications, Inc.
Dallas, Texas


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT




Ladies and Gentlemen:


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement  of IPVoice  Communications,  Inc.  on Form S-8 (file no.  333-101230)
pertaining  to the  IPVoice  Communications  2002  Stock  Award  Consulting  and
Employees  Services Plan III, of our reports,  dated March 26, 2004 and March 7,
2003,  on the financial  statements of the company,  as of December 31, 2003 and
2002, and for the years then ended, respectively, included in the Company's 2003
and 2002 Annual Reports on Form 10-KSB.




/s/Durland & Company, CPAs, P.A.
Durland & Company, CPAs, P.A.

Palm Beach, Florida
April 2, 2004
[COCA-COLA LOGO APPEARS HERE]

James L. Moore
President and C.O.O.


July 1, 1999


Mr. Michael Coleman, President
Alcoa RPD Division
900 South Gay Street
Suite 1100
Knoxville, Tennessee 37902

Subject:         Amendment to Soft Toll Agreement (Agreement)

Dear Mike:

Confirming our companies' recent conversation about can promotional activities,
both parties have agreed to modify the Agreement as noted below:

     1. Sections 7 and 9 shall be eliminated in their entirety; and

     2. The Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated (CCBCC) Metal Cost (as
        defined in the Agreement) shall be subject to an $0.85 midwest ceiling
        for the term of the Agreement at no cost to CCBCC; all other provisions
        of Exhibit I shall remain in full force and effect.

Enclosed are three signed originals of this letter amendment. Please indicate
your agreement to the above by executing where indicated and returning one
original to me, and another original to Ken Carty.


Sincerely,


James L. Moore
President and C.O.O.

cc: File



Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated                         ALCOA, Inc.

By: /s/ James L. Moore                                     By: /s/ Mike Coleman
   -------------------                                        ------------------

Title: President and COO                                   Title: Vice President
      ------------------                                         ---------------

Date: July 1, 1999                                         Date: July 1, 1999
     -------------------                                        ----------------

4100 Coca-Cola Plaza,         (704) 551-4603     P.O. Box 31487,
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211                  Charlotte, North Carolina 28231
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30192]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ID-7563-000]


Meserve, Richard A.; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on December 18, 2014, Richard A. Meserve submitted 
for filing, an application for authority to hold interlocking 
positions, pursuant to section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 
16 U.S.C. 825(b) and part 45 of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR part 
45.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables subscribers to 
receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed 
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#10565542535f7e7c797e75436560607f626450767562733e777f66"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d69093849599b8babfb8b385a3a6a6b9a4a296b0b3a4b5f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 8, 2015.

    Dated: December 18, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30192 Filed 12-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-82,492]

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on April 3, 2013, applicable to workers of Creation Technologies Kentucky, Inc., including on-site leased workers from Manpower and Kelly Services, Lexington, Kentucky. The Department's notice of determination was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 30, 2013 (78 FR 25306).                

At the request of the State Workforce Office, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged in production of electronic products.

The company reports that workers leased from NESCO were employed on-site at Creation Technologies Kentucky, Inc., Lexington, Kentucky. The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be considered leased workers.

Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers leased from NESCO working on-site at the Lexington, Kentucky location of Creation Technologies Kentucky, Inc.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-82,492 is hereby issued as follows:

                        All workers of NESCO, reporting to Creation Technologies Kentucky, Inc.,                               ( print page 78495)                            Lexington, Kentucky, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after February 21, 2012 through April 3, 2015, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through April 3, 2015, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.                    

Signed in Washington, DC, this 16th day of December 2014.

Michael W. Jaffe,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2014-30506 Filed 12-29-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Jose DOMINGUEZ.

No. 90 CR 379.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois.

July 1, 1991.

See also 131 F.R.D. 556.

*670Fred Foreman, U.S. Atty. by Joshua T. Buchman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chicago, 111., for U.S.

Jose Dominguez, pro se.

ORDER

BUA, District Judge.

Petitioner Jose Dominguez seeks credit toward his term of imprisonment for time he characterizes as “time spent in constructive custody.” Essentially, he is requesting credit for time he spent released on bond. Petitioner argues that he should receive credit for this time as it was served under “highly restrictive bail requirements.” For the reasons stated below, the court denies petitioner’s motion.

Under 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b) which has replaced 18 U.S.C. § 3568, credit for prior custody shall be granted where defendant has spent time in *official detention*prior to the date his sentence commences. In no way can petitioner’s release on bail be considered official detention. First, he was able to live at home during his release on bond. He was subject to some bail conditions, but these conditions can more rightly be considered lenient than restrictive. Petitioner was merely required to report once weekly by phone and once weekly in person to the Pretrial Services Office. Pretrial Services reports that petitioner’s in-person visits only lasted for approximately five minutes and his phone calls for a few minutes. And, although petitioner experienced restrictions on travel outside the Northern District, he was not restricted in any way in his travel within the district.

Credit for time served prior to custody has been denied in situations with bail restrictions far more severe than those imposed on petitioner. The Seventh Circuit in *Ramsey v. Brennan,*878 F.2d 995, 996 (7th Cir.1989), refused to credit an inmate for time served in a halfway house even though the inmate was confined to the residential center every night. In *United States v. Insley,*927 F.2d 185 (4th Cir. 1991), a defendant was released on bond subject to conditions that she remain at her parents’ residence unless seeking employment, travelling to work or travelling to church; be in her residence by 9:00 p.m.; be subject to electronic monitoring; report to the probation office on a regular basis; and submit to random drug-testing. The court denied her petition for credit for this time stating that “[cjonditions of release are not custody.” *Id.*at 186. *See also United States v. Browning,*761 F.Supp. 681 (C.D.Cal.1991) (defendant confined to residence and electronically monitored during bail denied credit for time served).

Accordingly, the court declines to give petitioner credit for time he served while released on bail.

IT IS SO ORDERED.