alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2295 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2295

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agency 
   and Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human 
     Services, Food and Drug Administration, for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agency 
   and Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human 
     Services, Food and Drug Administration, for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RELATED AGENCY AND 
              FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 
              HUMAN SERVICES, FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, FOR FISCAL 
              YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Related Agency and Food 
and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Food 
and Drug Administration, for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 
$5,584,965,000.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DOROTHY M. HOLCOMBE, )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION 15-00028-KD-M

 )

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

Defendant. ) 

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no 

objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B), dated November 5, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act

(“EAJA”) (Doc. 17) is GRANTED and Plaintiff is AWARDED an EAJA Attorney’s fee in the 

amount of $2,980.04.

DONE and ORDERED this 3rd day of December 2015.

 s/ Kristi K. DuBose

 KRISTI K. DuBOSE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00028-KD-M Document 20 Filed 12/03/15 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jean Dufresne, Appellant.

[973 NYS2d 80]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), rendered on or about April 24, 2012, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.B, Renwick, DeGrasse, Freedman and Feinman, JJ.
1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-3268

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri Lincoln Cardell Henderson, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 21, 2005 Filed: January 9, 2006

___________ Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Lincoln Henderson appeals from a final j udgment entered in the District Court 1 for the Western District of Missouri upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of conspiracy to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base and possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), 846. Henderson was sentencedto two concurrent terms of life imprisonment. On appeal, his counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sufficiency of the-2- evidence to support Henderson’s drug convicti ons. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
This court reviews the sufficiency of the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, resolving evidentiary co nflicts in favor of the government, and accepting all reasonable inferences thatsupport the jury’s verdict. See United States v. Ramirez , 350 F.3d 780, 783 (8th Cir. 2003). We hold that the evidence was sufficient to support Henderson’s convictions. Regarding the count for possession with intent to distribute, the evidence sufficiently established that, on October 29, 2003, Henderson possessed a plas tic bag containing a beige rock-like substance which tested positive for cocaine base and wei ghed over 50 grams. Henderson’s intent to distribute the substance was sufficiently established in light of the testimony of cooperating witnesses regard ing his extensive drug-dealing activities, the drug quantity, and the cash recovered from him at the time of his arrest. SeeUnited States v. Brett , 872 F.2d 1365, 1370 (8th Cir.) (intent to distribute may be inferred from circumstantial evidence suchas quantity of drugs and large amount of cash), cert. denied , 493 U.S. 932 (1989). The cooperating witnesses’ testimony also amply supported Henderson’s conviction on the conspiracy count. See United States v. Galaviz-Luna , 416 F.3d 796, 799 (8th Cir.) (e vidence including cooperating witnesses’ testimony regardi ng defendant’s drug-dealing activities held sufficient to support drug conspiracy conviction), cert. denied , 2005 WL 3272276 ( U.S. Dec. 5, 2005) (No. 05-7396).
Having reviewed the record i ndependently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and deny Henderson’s motions for appointment of new counsel.

______________________________
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFIED WRITTEN STATEMENT ACCOMPANYING
                    ----------------------------------------
                           PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS
                           --------------------------

                          (PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350)
                          ----------------------------

The undersigned, Cody C. Ashwell, Chief Executive Officer, and Richard A.
Gartrell, Chief Financial Officer, of Javo Beverage Company, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), each hereby certify that--

the accompanying periodic report containing financial statements filed by the
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)); and

information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this certificate, which
accompanies the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the annual period
ended December 31, 2003.

Dated: April 13, 2004              /s/ Cody C. Ashwell
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Cody C. Ashwell, Chief Executive Officer and
                                   Chairman of the Board

Dated: April 13, 2004              /s/ Richard A. Gartrell
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Richard A. Gartrell, Chief Financial Officer

                                       25
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Alan PARDOFIGUEROA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50834.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 12, 2006.*

Decided June 16, 2006.

Becky S. Walker, Esq., Douglas M. Miller, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael Tanaka, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FERNANDEZ, KLEINFELD and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Alan Pardofigueroa appeals from the district court’s judgment and 27-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea *626conviction to Conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, Fraud and Misuse of Documents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a), and False Statements, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Pardofigueroa contends that the district court erred by applying a preponderance of the evidence standard, rather than the beyond a reasonable doubt standard, when determining whether the factual predicate for a sentencing enhancement had been met. This contention is foreclosed by *United States v. Kilby,*443 F.3d 1135, 1143 (9th Cir.2006) (holding that under the advisory guidelines, a district court should resolve factual disputes at sentencing by applying the preponderance of the evidence standard).

Pardofigueroa also contends that the district court plainly erred by imposing a condition of supervised release that required him to report to his probation officer within 72 hours of re-entering the United States because such a condition violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This contention is foreclosed by *United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez,*441 F.3d 767, 772-73 (9th Cir.2006) (holding that a condition of supervised release that requires a defendant to report to his probation officer upon re-entry to the United States does not violate the defendant’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of J.L. French Automotive Castings, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I ,
John F. Falcon, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. /s/ JOHN F. FALCON  John F. Falcon
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) March 17, 2004
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 16, 2009

p0116 

# Order

January 16, 2009

137740 & (10)(11)

CHRISTY ANDERSON, Guardian of the Estate of YVETTE ANDERSON, a Legally Incapacitated Person, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137740 COA: 289047 Wayne CC: 05-529951-NF AUTO CLUB INSURA NCE ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Chief Jus tice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for l eave to appeal is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISM ISSED with prejudice and without costs.

H ATHAWAY

, J., not participating. To avoid u nnecessary delay to the parties in cases considered by this Cour t before I assumed office, I fo llow the practice of previous justices in transition and p articipate only in cases that need my vote to achieve a majority for a decision.
Opinion issued April 19, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-21-00644-CV

———————————

FADI N. MOGHIEH, Appellant

V.

MIREILLE EL ETER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2021-56576

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Fadi N. Moghieh, has neither paid the required fees nor established 

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.

GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041; Order, Fees Charged in 

the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial 
2

Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). 

After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not 

respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of 

prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Countiss and Farris.
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF PACER INTERNATIONAL, INC.



|                                                                                   |  |                              
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                                                                                   |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Intermodal Container Service, Inc. d/b/a Harbor Rail Transport                     |  | California                   
|Manufacturers Consolidation Service of Canada, Inc.                                |  | Delaware                     
|Pacer Cartage, Inc.                                                                |  | Delaware                     
|Pacer Transport, Inc.                                                              |  | California                   
|Pacer Distribution Services, Inc.                                                  |  | Delaware                     
|PDS Trucking, Inc.                                                                 |  | Delaware                     
|RF International, Ltd.                                                             |  | New York                     
|Ocean World Lines, Inc.                                                            |  | Delaware                     
|Pacer Transporation Solutions, Inc. formerly known as Pacer Global Logistics, Inc. |  | Ohio                         
|Pacer Stacktrain S. de R.L. de C.V.                                                |  | Mexico                       
|Stacktrain Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.                                              |  | Mexico                       
|Pacer Stacktrain, Inc.                                                             |  | Tennessee                    
|S&H Transport, Inc.                                                                |  | Delaware                     
|S&H Leasing, Inc.                                                                  |  | Delaware                     
|Pacer Container Line, Inc.                                                         |  | Delaware                     
|CTP Leasing, Inc.                                                                  |  | Delaware                     
|Rail to Rail Transport, Inc.                                                       |  | Delaware
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 222 

To direct the Secretary of Energy to require as a condition of any sale 

of crude oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve that the crude oil 

not be exported to certain countries, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. WITTMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Energy to require as a condition 

of any sale of crude oil from the Strategic Petroleum 

Reserve that the crude oil not be exported to certain 

countries, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Oil for CCP Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. SPR CRUDE OIL EXPORT BAN. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including 

7 section 161 of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act 

8 (42 U.S.C. 6241), with respect to the draw down and sale 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 222 IH

1 at auction of any crude oil from the Strategic Petroleum 

2 Reserve after the date of enactment of this Act, the Sec3 retary of Energy, in consultation with the Secretary of 

4 Commerce and the Director of National Intelligence, shall 

5 require, as a condition of any such sale, that— 

6 (1) the crude oil not be exported to— 

7 (A) the People’s Republic of China; 

8 (B) the Democratic People’s Republic of 

9 Korea; or 

10 (C) the Islamic Republic of Iran; and 

11 (2) the recipient is not under the ownership, 

12 control, or influence of the Chinese Communist 

13 Party. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### **EXHIBIT 11**

 

**TELLABS, INC.**

**COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS**

(In millions, except per share amounts)

 
| ** **                                                            | ** ** | **Three Months Ended** | ** ** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                            | ** ** | **4/1/05**             | ** ** | **4/2/04** | ** ** |
| Numerator:                                                            |       |                   |       |   |   |
| Net earnings                                                          |       | $                      | 0.7        |   | $ | 13.4 |   |
|                                                                  |       |                   |       |   |   |
| Denominator:                                                          |       |                   |       |   |   |
| Denominator  for basic earnings per share-                            |       |                   |       |   |   |
| Weighted-average  shares outstanding                                  |       | 455.8                  |       | 415.2 |   |
| Effect of  dilutive securities:                                       |       |                   |       |   |   |
| Employee  stock options and awards                                    |       | 3.0                    |       | 5.7 |   |
| Denominator  for diluted earnings per share-                          |       |                   |       |   |   |
| Adjusted  weighted-average shares outstanding and assumed conversions |       | 458.8                  |       | 420.9 |   |
|                                                                  |       |                   |       |   |   |
| Net earnings per share - basic                                        |       | $                      | 0.00       |   | $ | 0.03 |   |
| Net earnings per share - diluted                                      |       | $                      | 0.00       |   | $ | 0.03 |   |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50433 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN CARLOS ARVIZU-CASTILLO Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:06-CR-291-ALL Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Carlos Arvizu-Castillo raises arguments that areforeclosed by Almendarez-Torresv. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. U nited Statesv. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 3, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-10280

2 Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and thejudgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection
with the Quarterly Report of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. (CRM) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerome S. Flum, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge: (1)
The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By: /s/
Jerome S.
 FlumJerome S.
 FlumChief
 Executive Officer May 12, 2008 This
certification is being furnished to the SEC with this Report pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to liability of that section. 17