IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

CASE NUMBER: UR-16,282-06

TRIAL COURT NUMBER 565079-E

IN THE 179TH DISTRICT COURT

OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

MATHIS CARL WILLIAMS, MOVANT

US.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

MOTION FOR REHEARING

SUBMITTED BY

ll/^iQ^oU

GM30TII0NI DEEDED

BY: 7%>

M 20 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk

MATHIS CARL UILLIAMS

TDCD-ID NUMBER 5706B7

COFFIELJD UNIT

2661 FM 2054

TENNESSEE COLONY, TEXAS

75884-5000

MOVANT PRO SE
IN RE: NUMBER UR-T6,282-06'

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL- APPEALS

AUSTIN,TEXAS

MATHIS CARL WILLIAMS ,JR .,

MOVANT

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

MOTION FOR REHEARING

To the honorable court of criminal appeals:

mathis carl uilliams,3r., Movant herein, respectfully sub

mits this Motion For Rehearing pursuant to Art.11.07 and Gov't,

Code §508.283 and §508.281.

HISTORY OF CASE

Movant mas convicted of Robbery in Trial court Cause num

ber 565079 and Unauthorized Use of a Mo toe Vehicle in Cause

number 566476, in Harris County, Texas on October 22,1990.

Sentence was assessed at 28 years in each case and were ordered

to be served concurrently.

Movant uas transferred to the tdcj-cid and served 16 years,

6 months and 2 days before being released to parole on January

10,2007. On the day of release, Movant had 11 years,5 months

and 28 days remaining to serve on his sentences.

Movant uas out of custody 6 years, 4 months and 7 days be

fore his parole uas revoked on May 31,2013.

Movant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus

challenging the denial of his "street time" credits and uas

dismissed without written order because of numerous urits.
Movant believes his application was erroneously dismissed be

cause he is NOT challenging the underlying convictions as he

did in all his previous applications. Movant believes he is en

titled to his street time credits and respectfully ire-urges his

arguments in Cause Number WR-16 ,282-06.

The application for writ of habeas corpus, the subject of

this motion for rehearing, uas the first time Movant requested

review for the denial of street time credits. TDCJ-CID relies

upon Gov't.Code §§508.149 and 5 0 8.2B3 to authorize forfeiture of

street time credits. Movant shoued this honorable court how this

law does NOT apply . Movant. Movant pleads for clarity of what

is "prior", what is "holding" and uhat is "current" as to the

description of convictions for the purpose of Gov't.Code' §5 0 8.283

II.

CONCLUSION

Wherefore, premises considered, Movant prays this honorable

court will grant this Motion For Rehearing because his applica

tion for writ of habeas corpus uas erroneously dismissed without

proper justification. Ex Parte Barber, 8 79' S. Id. 2d 889. This was

Movant's first request for review of the denial of his street

time credits and misapplication of the law by TDCD-CID. Movant

believes he is entitled to review of his revocation of super

vised release. Movant re-urges his original grounds of error

and requests review on the merits. With this motion, Movant is

attempting to exhaust his available State remedies to comply

uith exhaustion requirements.

Respectfully Submitted,

\

-2-
d ?K6?0tSr SPlAs£/t-^

Mathis Carl Williams,Dr.

Movant Pro Se

TDCj-CID #570687

Coffield Unit

2661 FM 2054

Tennessee Colony, Texas

75884-5000

OATH OF AFFIRMATION

I, Mathis Carl Williams,Jr. , am the Movant and being pre

sently incarcerated in TDC3-CID- Coffield Unit, declare under

penalty of perjury that, according to my belief, the facts stated

in the above Motion For Rehearing, are true and correct.

Executed this I l • day of January, 2015.

Movant Pro Se