FORM 10-QSB-- QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                        THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                        Quarterly or Transitional Report



                      U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

                   For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002


[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-10304


                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
         (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                             95-3557899
(State or other jurisdiction of                              (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                             Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                      (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)


Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the Partnership was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No___



                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION



ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


a)

                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                          (in thousands, except unit data)

                                 March 31, 2002

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Assets
<S>                                                                       <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                              $    186
   Receivables and deposits                                                     33
   Restricted escrows                                                           69
   Other assets                                                                214
   Investment properties:
      Land                                                     $   312
      Buildings and related personal property                   10,329
                                                                10,641
      Less accumulated depreciation                             (7,714)      2,927
                                                                          $  3,429

Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                       $     46
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                          25
   Accrued property taxes                                                       13
   Due to General Partner                                                      102
   Other liabilities                                                           182
   Mortgage notes payable                                                    8,494

Partners' Deficit
   General partners                                           $ (247)
   Limited partners (18,625 units issued and
      outstanding)                                             (5,186)      (5,433)
                                                                          $  3,429


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>




b)

                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                          (in thousands, except unit data)






                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                                March 31,
                                                            2002        2001
Revenues:
   Rental income                                          $  589      $  590
   Other income                                               55          38
      Total revenues                                         644         628

Expenses:
   Operating                                                 235         211
   General and administrative                                 49          47
   Depreciation                                              130         122
   Interest                                                  172         174
   Property taxes                                             53          44
      Total expenses                                         639         598

Net income                                                $    5      $   30

Net income allocated to general partners (1%)             $   --      $   --

Net income allocated to limited partners (99%)                 5          30

                                                          $    5      $   30

Net income per limited partnership unit                   $  .27      $ 1.61


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

<PAGE>


c)

                                 ANGELES PARTNERS X
               CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT
                                   (Unaudited)
                          (in thousands, except unit data)




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                     Limited
                                     Partnership     General      Limited
                                        Units        Partners    Partners     Total

<S>                                    <C>             <C>        <C>        <C>
Original capital contributions         18,714          $ 1        $18,714    $18,715

Partners' deficit at
   December 31, 2001                   18,625        $ (247)     $(5,191)    $(5,438)

Net income for the three months
   ended March 31, 2002                    --             --           5           5

Partners' deficit
   at March 31, 2002                   18,625        $ (247)     $(5,186)    $(5,433)


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>


d)
                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                   (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                       March 31,
                                                                  2002        2001
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                             <C>          <C>
  Net income                                                    $     5      $    30
  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
   provided by operating activities:
   Depreciation                                                     130          122
   Amortization of discounts and loan costs                          10           11
  Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                        6            4
      Other assets                                                  (64)         (52)
      Accounts payable                                              (37)           4
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                             4           (1)
      Accrued property taxes                                         13           10
      Due to General Partner                                         (1)          --
      Other liabilities                                              95           99

       Net cash provided by operating activities                    161          227

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                            (25)        (148)
  Net withdrawals from (deposits to) restricted escrows              35          (17)

       Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities           10         (165)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage notes payable                                (33)         (31)
  Payments on advances from General Partner                         (36)          --

       Net cash used in financing activities                        (69)         (31)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents                           102           31

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                     84          158

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                      $   186      $   189

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest                                          $   164      $   164

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:

At March 31, 2001 and  December 31,  2000,  approximately  $117,000 and $83,000,
respectively,  of  property  improvements  and  replacements  were  included  in
accounts payable.


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>




e)
                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
                     NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Angeles Partners
X (the  "Partnership"  or  "Registrant")  have been prepared in accordance  with
generally accepted accounting  principles for interim financial  information and
with  the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and Item  310(b)  of  Regulation  S-B.
Accordingly,  they do not include all of the information and footnotes  required
by generally accepted accounting  principles for complete financial  statements.
The general partner responsible for management of the Partnership's  business is
Angeles  Realty  Corporation  (the "General  Partner" or "ARC"),  a wholly owned
subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"),  a publicly
traded real estate investment trust. In the opinion of the General Partner,  all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a
fair  presentation  have been  included.  Operating  results for the three month
period ended March 31, 2002 are not  necessarily  indicative of the results that
may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2002. For further  information,
refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in
the  Partnership's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2001.

Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the General Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The Partnership  Agreement  provides for (i) certain  payments to affiliates for
services and (ii)  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on
behalf of the Partnership.

During the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, affiliates of the General
Partner  were  entitled to receive 5% of gross  receipts  from the  Registrant's
properties for providing property  management  services.  The Registrant paid to
such  affiliates  approximately  $32,000 and $31,000 for the three month periods
ended  March 31, 2002 and 2001,  respectively.  These  amounts  are  included in
operating expenses.

An  affiliate  of the General  Partner  received  reimbursement  of  accountable
administrative  expenses amounting to approximately  $35,000 and $33,000 for the
three  months  ended March 31, 2002 and 2001,  respectively.  These  amounts are
included in general and administrative expenses and investment properties.

In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, the General Partner has loaned the
Partnership  funds to cover capital  improvements  at Greentree  Apartments.  At
March 31, 2002,  the amount of the  outstanding  loans and accrued  interest was
approximately  $102,000 and is included in Due to General  Partner.  Interest is
charged at the prime rate plus 2%. Interest expense was approximately $1,000 for
the three months  ended March 31, 2002.  During the three months ended March 31,
2002, the  Partnership  made  principal  payments of  approximately  $36,000 and
interest payments of approximately $2,000 to the General Partner.  There were no
loans from the General Partner or associated  interest  expense during the three
months ended March 31, 2001.

Pursuant  to the  Partnership  Agreement,  the  General  Partner is  entitled to
receive a distribution  equal to 4% of the aggregate  disposition  price of sold
properties.  The  Partnership  paid a distribution  of $154,000,  to the General
Partner related to the sale of Vista Hills Apartments in 1999. This distribution
is  subordinate  to  the  limited  partners  receiving  their  original  capital
contributions  plus a  cumulative  preferred  return  of 6% per  annum  of their
adjusted capital  investment,  as defined in the Partnership  Agreement.  If the
limited   partners  have  not  received  these  returns  when  the   Partnership
terminates, the General Partner will return this amount to the Partnership.

Beginning in 2001, the  Partnership  began insuring its properties up to certain
limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally  self-insured for a
portion of losses and  liabilities  related  to workers  compensation,  property
casualty and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the
AIMCO  limits  through  insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers
unaffiliated  with the General Partner.  During the three months ended March 31,
2002  and  2001,  the  Partnership  was  charged  by  AIMCO  and its  affiliates
approximately $30,000 and $33,000, respectively, for insurance coverage and fees
associated with policy claims administration.

Note C - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their  affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purports to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial
dissolution of the  Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General  Partner filed a
motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The General Partner filed demurrers to
the amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On July 10,  2001,  the Court  issued  an order  sustaining
defendants'  demurrer on certain grounds.  On July 20, 2001,  Plaintiffs filed a
motion for  reconsideration  of the Court's July 10, 2001 order granting in part
and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001, Plaintiffs filed
a fourth amended class and derivative action  complaint.  On September 12, 2001,
the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On October 5, 2001, the
General Partner and affiliated defendants filed a demurrer to the fourth amended
complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001. On February 2, 2002, the Court
served its order granting in part the demurrer.  The Court has dismissed without
leave  to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'  claims.  On  February  11,  2002,
plaintiffs  filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class  comprised of all
non-affiliated  persons  who own or have owned  units in the  partnerships.  The
General Partner and affiliated  defendants oppose the motion. On April 29, 2002,
the Court heard argument on the motion and ordered further  briefing after which
time the matter will be taken under submission. The Court has set the matter for
trial in January 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the General Partner and affiliated defendants
moved to strike the first  amended  complaint in its entirety for  violating the
Court's  July 10, 2001 order  granting  in part and denying in part  defendants'
demurrer in the Nuanes action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of
the  complaint  based on the statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the
action demurred to the fourth amended complaint,  and,  alternatively,  moved to
strike the  complaint.  On December  11, 2001,  the court heard  argument on the
motions and took the matters under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court
served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the Heller
complaint  as a violation  of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On
March 27, 2002, the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking the
complaint.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any  costs,  whether  legal or
settlement  costs,   associated  with  these  cases  will  be  material  to  the
Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.


<PAGE>




ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The  matters  discussed  in this Form  10-QSB  contain  certain  forward-looking
statements  and  involve  risks and  uncertainties  (including  changing  market
conditions,   competitive  and  regulatory   matters,   etc.)  detailed  in  the
disclosures  contained  in this  Form  10-QSB  and the  other  filings  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission made by the Registrant from time to time. The
discussions of the  Registrant's  business and results of operations,  including
forward-looking  statements  pertaining  to such  matters,  does not  take  into
account the effects of any changes to the  Registrant's  business and results of
operation.  Accordingly,  actual  results  could  differ  materially  from those
projected in the forward-looking  statements as a result of a number of factors,
including those identified herein.

The Partnership's  investment properties consist of two apartment complexes. The
following table sets forth the average occupancy of the Partnership's properties
for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001:

                                                   Average Occupancy
      Property                                      2002       2001

      Greentree Apartments                          95%        96%
        Mobile, Alabama
      Carriage Hills Apartments                     93%        97%
        East Lansing, Michigan

The General  Partner  attributes  the decrease in  occupancy  at Carriage  Hills
Apartments  to a decline in overall  market  conditions  and lower home mortgage
interest rates in the East Lansing area.

Results of Operations

The  Partnership's  net income for the three  months  ended  March 31,  2002 was
approximately $5,000, as compared to net income of approximately $30,000 for the
three  months  ended  March 31,  2001.  The  decrease in net income is due to an
increase in total expenses,  which was partially  offset by an increase in total
revenues.  Total  expenses  increased  primarily  due to increases in operating,
depreciation and property tax expenses.  Operating expenses increased  primarily
due  to an  increase  in  maintenance  expense  at  both  of  the  Partnership's
investment properties and an increase in appraisal fees at Greentree Apartments.
Depreciation  expense  increased  due  to  an  increase  in  depreciable  assets
resulting from property improvements and replacements  completed during the past
twelve months.  Property tax expense  increased  primarily due to an increase in
the tax rate at both of the Partnership's  investment properties and an increase
in the assessed value at Carriage Hills Apartments. Interest expense and general
and  administrative  expenses  remained  relatively  constant for the comparable
periods.  Included in general and administrative expenses at both March 31, 2002
and 2001 are management  reimbursements  to the General Partner as allowed under
the Partnership Agreement. In addition,  costs associated with the quarterly and
annual  communications  with  investors and  regulatory  agencies and the annual
audit required by the Partnership Agreement are also included.

Total  revenues  increased due to an increase in other  income.  The increase in
other  income is  primarily  due to  increases  in laundry  income at  Greentree
Apartments and utility  reimbursements  and lease  cancellation fees at Carriage
Hills Apartments.  Rental income remained relatively constant for the comparable
periods as the  decreases  in  occupancy  were  offset by an increase in average
rental rates at both properties.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the General  Partner
monitors the rental market  environment of each of its investment  properties to
assess the feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy
levels and protecting  the  Partnership  from increases in expenses.  As part of
this plan,  the General  Partner  attempts to protect the  Partnership  from the
burden of  inflation-related  increases  in  expenses  by  increasing  rents and
maintaining a high overall  occupancy  level.  However,  due to changing  market
conditions,  which  can  result  in the use of  rental  concessions  and  rental
reductions to offset softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the
General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  March  31,  2002,  the  Partnership   had  cash  and  cash   equivalents  of
approximately  $186,000,  compared to approximately  $189,000 at March 31, 2001.
The  increase in cash and cash  equivalents  of  approximately  $102,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2002, from the Partnership's  calendar year end, is
due to  approximately  $161,000 of cash  provided by  operating  activities  and
approximately  $10,000  of cash  provided  by  investing  activities,  which was
partially offset by approximately  $69,000 of cash used in financing activities.
Cash  provided by investing  activities  consisted  of net receipts  from escrow
accounts  maintained  by the  mortgage  lender,  partially  offset  by  property
improvements and replacements.  Cash used in financing  activities  consisted of
payments on advances from the General  Partner and payments of principal made on
the mortgages encumbering the Registrant's  properties.  The Partnership invests
its working capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures  required at the investment  properties to adequately  maintain the
physical  assets and other  operating needs of the Registrant and to comply with
Federal, state and local legal and regulatory requirements. Capital improvements
planned for the Partnership's properties are detailed below.

Greentree  Apartments:  For  2002 the  Partnership  has  budgeted  approximately
$65,000 for capital improvements, consisting primarily of floor covering and air
conditioning unit replacement.  The Partnership completed  approximately $16,000
in capital expenditures at Greentree Apartments as of March 31, 2002, consisting
primarily of interior building  improvements and appliance  replacements.  These
improvements were funded primarily from operations and replacement reserves.

Carriage Hills Apartments:  For 2002 the Partnership has budgeted  approximately
$284,000 for capital  improvements,  consisting primarily of window replacement,
roofing  upgrades,  and floor covering  replacement.  The Partnership  completed
approximately  $9,000 in capital expenditures at Carriage Hills Apartments as of
March 31, 2002, consisting primarily of structural building improvements and air
conditioning unit  replacements.  These improvements were funded from operations
and replacement reserves.

The additional  capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available
from  operations  and  Partnership  reserves.  To the extent that such  budgeted
capital improvements are completed, the Registrant's distributable cash flow, if
any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The  Registrant's  current assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term
needs  (exclusive  of capital  improvements)  of the  Registrant.  The  mortgage
indebtedness of approximately $8,494,000,  net of discount, matures October 2003
and December  2004 with balloon  payments due at maturity.  The General  Partner
will attempt to refinance such indebtedness  and/or sell the properties prior to
such  maturity  dates.  If the  properties  cannot be  refinanced  or sold for a
sufficient  amount,  the  Registrant  will risk losing such  properties  through
foreclosure.

There were no  distributions  to the limited  partners  during the three  months
ended March 31,  2002 and 2001.  Future  cash  distributions  will depend on the
levels of net cash generated from operations,  the availability of cash reserves
and the timing of debt  maturities,  refinancings,  and/or property  sales.  The
Registrant's  cash  available for  distribution  is reviewed on a monthly basis.
There  can  be  no  assurance,  however,  that  the  Partnership  will  generate
sufficient funds from operations, after required capital expenditures, to permit
any distributions to its partners in 2002 or subsequent  periods.  Distributions
may be restricted by the requirement to deposit net operating income (as defined
in the  mortgage  note) into the Reserve  Account  until the Reserve  Account is
funded  in an  amount  equal to $200 to $400 per  apartment  unit for  Greentree
Apartments  for a total of  $35,600  to  $71,200.  As of  March  31,  2002,  the
Partnership has deposits of approximately $48,000 in the reserve account.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 9,926 limited  partnership units in
the Partnership  representing 53.29% of the outstanding units at March 31, 2002.
A number of these units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or
its  affiliates.  It is possible that AIMCO or its  affiliates  will make one or
more additional offers to acquire  additional limited  partnership  interests in
the Partnership  for cash or in exchange for units in the operating  partnership
of AIMCO. Under the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the
units are  entitled to take action with  respect to a variety of matters,  which
would  include  voting on certain  amendments to the  Partnership  Agreement and
voting to remove the General Partner.  As a result of its ownership of 53.29% of
the  outstanding  units,  AIMCO is in a  position  to  control  all such  voting
decisions with respect to the Registrant. When voting on matters, AIMCO would in
all likelihood vote the units it acquired in a manner  favorable to the interest
of the General Partner because of its affiliation with the General Partner.


<PAGE>


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their  affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purports to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial
dissolution of the  Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General  Partner filed a
motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The General Partner filed demurrers to
the amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On July 10,  2001,  the Court  issued  an order  sustaining
defendants'  demurrer on certain grounds.  On July 20, 2001,  Plaintiffs filed a
motion for  reconsideration  of the Court's July 10, 2001 order granting in part
and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001, Plaintiffs filed
a fourth amended class and derivative action  complaint.  On September 12, 2001,
the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On October 5, 2001, the
General Partner and affiliated defendants filed a demurrer to the fourth amended
complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001. On February 2, 2002, the Court
served its order granting in part the demurrer.  The Court has dismissed without
leave  to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'  claims.  On  February  11,  2002,
plaintiffs  filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class  comprised of all
non-affiliated  persons  who own or have owned  units in the  partnerships.  The
General Partner and affiliated  defendants oppose the motion. On April 29, 2002,
the Court heard argument on the motion and ordered further  briefing after which
time the matter will be taken under submission. The Court has set the matter for
trial in January 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the General Partner and affiliated defendants
moved to strike the first  amended  complaint in its entirety for  violating the
Court's  July 10, 2001 order  granting  in part and denying in part  defendants'
demurrer in the Nuanes action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of
the  complaint  based on the statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the
action demurred to the fourth amended complaint,  and,  alternatively,  moved to
strike the  complaint.  On December  11, 2001,  the court heard  argument on the
motions and took the matters under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court
served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the Heller
complaint  as a violation  of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On
March 27, 2002, the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking the
complaint.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any  costs,  whether  legal or
settlement  costs,   associated  with  these  cases  will  be  material  to  the
Partnership's overall operations.


<PAGE>



ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

a)    Exhibits:

                  None.

            b)    Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended March 31, 2002.




<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                               ANGELES PARTNERS X

                                 By:     Angeles Realty Corporation
                                         Its General Partner

                                 By:     /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                         Patrick J. Foye
                                         Executive Vice President

                                 By:     /s/Martha L. Long
                                         Martha L. Long
                                         Senior Vice President and
                                         Controller

                                 Date:   May 10, 2002