FORM 10-QSB-- QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                        Quarterly or Transitional Report



                      U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

                   For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2001


[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-10304


                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
         (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                             95-3557899
(State or other jurisdiction of                              (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                             Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                      (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)


Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the Partnership was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No___


<PAGE>


                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION



ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


a)

                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                          (in thousands, except unit data)
                                   (Unaudited)

                                 March 31, 2001


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Assets
<S>                                                           <C>          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                              $    189
   Receivables and deposits                                                     82
   Restricted escrows                                                          106
   Other assets                                                                238
   Investment properties:
      Land                                                     $   312
      Buildings and related personal property                   10,065
                                                                10,377
      Less accumulated depreciation                             (7,210)      3,167
                                                                          $  3,782

Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                       $    197
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                          14
   Accrued property taxes                                                       20
   Other liabilities                                                           230
   Mortgage notes payable                                                    8,616

Partners' Deficit
   General partner                                            $ (245)
   Limited partners (18,625 units issued and
      outstanding)                                             (5,050)      (5,295)
                                                                          $  3,782


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


<PAGE>




b)

                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                          (in thousands, except unit data)



                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                                March 31,
                                                            2001        2000
Revenues:
   Rental income                                          $  590      $  569
   Other income                                               38          35
      Total revenues                                         628         604

Expenses:
   Operating                                                 211         209
   General and administrative                                 47          41
   Depreciation                                              122         110
   Interest                                                  174         165
   Property taxes                                             44          47
      Total expenses                                         598         572

Net income                                                $   30      $   32

Net income allocated to general partner (1%)              $   --      $   --

Net income allocated to limited partners (99%)                30          32

                                                          $   30      $   32
Net income per limited partnership unit                   $ 1.61      $ 1.72



            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


<PAGE>


c)

                                 ANGELES PARTNERS X
               CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT
                                   (Unaudited)
                          (in thousands, except unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                      Limited
                                     Partnership     General      Limited
                                        Units        Partners    Partners     Total

<S>                                    <C>             <C>        <C>        <C>
Original capital contributions         18,714          $ 1        $18,714    $18,715

Partners' deficit at
   December 31, 2000                   18,625        $ (245)     $(5,080)    $(5,325)

Net income for the three months
   ended March 31, 2001                    --             --          30          30

Partners' deficit
   at March 31, 2001                   18,625        $ (245)     $(5,050)    $(5,295)



            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


<PAGE>


d)
                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                   (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                       March 31,
                                                                  2001        2000
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                             <C>          <C>
  Net income                                                    $    30      $    32
  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
   provided by operating activities:
   Depreciation                                                     122          110
   Amortization of discounts and loan costs                          11           11
  Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                        4          161
      Other assets                                                  (52)         (34)
      Accounts payable                                                4            5
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                            (1)           1
      Accrued property taxes                                         10           11
      Other liabilities                                              99          (15)

       Net cash provided by operating activities                    227          282

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (148)        (114)
  Net (deposits to) receipts from restricted escrows                (17)          43

       Net cash used in investing activities                       (165)         (71)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage notes payable                                (31)         (26)
  Distributions to partners                                          --         (130)

       Net cash used in financing activities                        (31)        (156)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents                            31           55

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                    158        1,088

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                      $   189      $ 1,143

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest                                          $   164      $   131
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:
Property improvements and replacements in accounts
  payable                                                       $   117      $    --


At December 31, 2000 and March 31,  2001,  approximately  $83,000 and  $117,000,
respectively,  of  property  improvements  and  replacements  were  included  in
accounts payable.



            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


<PAGE>




e)
                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
                     NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)

Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Angeles Partners
X (the  "Partnership"  or  "Registrant")  have been prepared in accordance  with
generally accepted accounting  principles for interim financial  information and
with  the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and Item  310(b)  of  Regulation  S-B.
Accordingly,  they do not include all of the information and footnotes  required
by generally accepted accounting  principles for complete financial  statements.
The general partner responsible for management of the Partnership's  business is
Angeles  Realty  Corporation  (the "General  Partner" or "ARC"),  a wholly owned
subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"),  a publicly
traded real estate investment trust. In the opinion of the General Partner,  all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a
fair  presentation  have been  included.  Operating  results for the three month
period ended March 31, 2001 are not  necessarily  indicative of the results that
may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2001. For further  information,
refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in
the  Partnership's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2000.

Principles of Consolidation

The  consolidated   financial   statements  include  all  the  accounts  of  the
Partnership  and  its  99%  limited  partnership  interests  in  Cardinal  Woods
Apartments,  Ltd. and Carriage AP X Ltd. The General Partner of the consolidated
partnerships is Angeles Realty  Corporation.  Angeles Realty  Corporation may be
removed  as  the  general  partner  of  the  consolidated   partnership  by  the
Registrant;   therefore,  the  consolidated   partnerships  are  controlled  and
consolidated by the Registrant.  All significant  interpartnership balances have
been eliminated.

Segment Reporting

Statement of Financial  Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 131, "Disclosure about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" established standards for the
way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments
in annual  financial  statements  and  requires  that those  enterprises  report
selected  information about operating segments in interim financial reports.  It
also establishes  standards for related disclosures about products and services,
geographic  areas,  and  major  customers.  As  defined  in SFAS  No.  131,  the
Partnership has only one reportable  segment.  The General Partner believes that
segment-based disclosures will not result in a more meaningful presentation than
the consolidated financial statements as currently presented.

Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the General Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The Partnership  Agreement  provides for (i) certain  payments to affiliates for
services and (ii)  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on
behalf of the  Partnership.  The following  payments were paid or accrued to the
General Partner and its affiliates for the three months ended March 31, 2001 and
2000:

                                                              2001       2000
                                                              (in thousands)
   Property management fees (included in
     operating expenses)                                      $ 31       $ 31
   Reimbursement for services of affiliates
     (included in general and administrative expenses
      and investment properties)                                33         63

During the three months ended March 31, 2001 and 2000, affiliates of the General
Partner  were  entitled to receive 5% of gross  receipts  from the  Registrant's
properties for providing property  management  services.  The Registrant paid to
such affiliates  approximately $31,000 for both of the three month periods ended
March 31, 2001 and 2000.

An  affiliate  of the General  Partner  received  reimbursement  of  accountable
administrative  expenses amounting to approximately  $33,000 and $63,000 for the
three  months  ended  March 31, 2001 and 2000,  respectively.  Included in these
expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2000 is  approximately  $44,000 in
reimbursements for construction oversight costs. No such costs were incurred for
the three months ended March 31, 2001.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  currently own 9,751 limited  partnership
units in the Partnership  representing 52.35% of the outstanding units. A number
of these  units were  acquired  pursuant  to tender  offers made by AIMCO or its
affiliates.  It is possible that AIMCO or its  affiliates  will make one or more
additional offers to acquire  additional  limited  partnership  interests in the
Partnership  for cash or in exchange for units in the operating  partnership  of
AIMCO. Under the Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders  holding a majority of the
Units are  entitled to take action with  respect to a variety of matters,  which
would  include  without   limitation,   voting  on  certain  amendments  to  the
Partnership  Agreement and voting to remove the General Partner.  As a result of
its  ownership  of 52.35% of the  outstanding  units,  AIMCO is in a position to
influence all voting  decisions with respect to the  Registrant.  When voting on
matters,  AIMCO would in all  likelihood  vote the Units it acquired in a manner
favorable to the interest of the General Partner because of its affiliation with
the General Partner.

Note C - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial  Group,  Inc., et al. in the Superior Court of the State of California
for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs  named as defendants,  among others,
the   Partnership,   its  General  Partner  and  several  of  their   affiliated
partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action  purports to assert claims on
behalf of a class of limited  partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of
limited  partnerships  (including  the  Partnership)  which are named as nominal
defendants,  challenging the acquisition of interests in certain general partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities which were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units; the management of partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the  Insignia  Merger.  The  plaintiffs  seek
monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial  dissolution of the
Partnership.  On June 25,  1998,  the  General  Partner  filed a motion  seeking
dismissal of the action.  In lieu of  responding to the motion,  the  plaintiffs
have filed an amended  complaint.  The General  Partner  filed  demurrers to the
amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  The demurrer is scheduled to be heard on May 14, 2001.  The
Court has also  scheduled  a hearing  on a motion  for class  certification  for
August 27, 2001.  Plaintiffs must file their motion for class  certification  no
later than June 15, 2001.  The General  Partner does not  anticipate  that costs
associated  with  this  case  will  be  material  to the  Partnership's  overall
operations.

The Partnership is a party to certain legal actions resulting from its operating
activities.  These actions are routine litigation and administrative proceedings
arising in the  ordinary  course of business  and none of which are  expected to
have a  material  adverse  effect on the  consolidated  financial  condition  or
results of operations of the Partnership.


<PAGE>




ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The  matters  discussed  in this Form  10-QSB  contain  certain  forward-looking
statements  and  involve  risks and  uncertainties  (including  changing  market
conditions,   competitive  and  regulatory   matters,   etc.)  detailed  in  the
disclosures  contained  in this  Form  10-QSB  and the  other  filings  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission made by the Registrant from time to time. The
discussions of the  Registrant's  business and results of operations,  including
forward-looking  statements  pertaining  to such  matters,  does not  take  into
account the effects of any changes to the  Registrant's  business and results of
operation.  Accordingly,  actual  results  could  differ  materially  from those
projected in the forward-looking  statements as a result of a number of factors,
including those identified herein.

The Partnership's  investment properties consist of two apartment complexes. The
following table sets forth the average occupancy of the Partnership's properties
for the three months ended March 31, 2001 and 2000:

                                                   Average Occupancy
      Property                                      2001       2000

      Greentree Apartments                          96%        98%
        Mobile, Alabama
      Carriage Hills Apartments                     97%        94%
        East Lansing, Michigan

The General  Partner  attributes  the increase in  occupancy  at Carriage  Hills
Apartments to increased  marketing efforts and recent capital  improvements made
to enhance the overall appearance of the property.

Results of Operations

The  Registrant's  net  income for the three  months  ended  March 31,  2001 was
approximately $30,000, as compared to approximately $32,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2000.  The decrease in net income is due to an increase in total
expenses,  which was partially  offset by an increase in total  revenues.  Total
expenses  increased  primarily due to increases in depreciation  and general and
administrative  expenses.  Depreciation  expense increased due to an increase in
depreciable  assets  resulting  from  property   improvements  and  replacements
completed  during the past twelve months.  General and  administrative  expenses
increased  primarily due to an increase in the costs of services included in the
management   reimbursements   to  the  General  Partner  as  allowed  under  the
Partnership Agreement.  Also included in general and administrative  expenses at
both March 31, 2001 and 2000 are costs  associated with the quarterly and annual
communications  with  investors  and  regulatory  agencies  and the annual audit
required by the  Partnership  Agreement.  Operating  and  property  tax expenses
remained relatively constant for the comparable periods.

Total revenues  increased due to an increase in rental  income.  The increase in
rental  income is primarily  due to the  increase in  occupancy  and the average
rental rate at Carriage Hills Apartments, which was partially offset by a slight
decrease in occupancy at Greentree Apartments.  Other income remained relatively
constant for the comparable periods.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the General  Partner
monitors the rental market  environment of each of its investment  properties to
assess the feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy
levels and protecting  the  Partnership  from increases in expenses.  As part of
this plan,  the General  Partner  attempts to protect the  Partnership  from the
burden of  inflation-related  increases  in  expenses  by  increasing  rents and
maintaining a high overall  occupancy  level.  However,  due to changing  market
conditions,  which  can  result  in the use of  rental  concessions  and  rental
reductions to offset softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the
General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  March  31,  2001,  the  Partnership   had  cash  and  cash   equivalents  of
approximately $189,000,  compared to approximately $1,143,000 at March 31, 2000.
The increase in cash and cash equivalents of approximately $31,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2001, from the Partnership's calendar year end, is due to
approximately $227,000 of cash provided by operating activities which was offset
by approximately $165,000 of cash used in investing activities and approximately
$31,000 of cash used in financing activities.  Cash used in investing activities
consisted of property improvements and replacements, and to a lesser extent, net
deposits to escrow  accounts  maintained  by the mortgage  lender.  Cash used in
financing  activities  consisted of payments of principal  made on the mortgages
encumbering the  Registrant's  properties.  The Partnership  invests its working
capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures  required at the investment  properties to adequately  maintain the
physical  assets and other  operating needs of the Registrant and to comply with
Federal, state, local, legal and regulatory  requirements.  Capital improvements
planned for the Partnership's properties are detailed below.

Greentree  Apartments:  For  2001 the  Partnership  has  budgeted  approximately
$68,000 for capital  improvements,  consisting  primarily  of  appliances,  HVAC
upgrades,  interior building improvements,  and floor covering replacement.  The
Partnership completed approximately $61,000 in capital expenditures at Greentree
Apartments  as of March 31,  2001,  consisting  primarily  of interior  building
improvements and appliance and floor covering  replacements.  These improvements
were funded primarily from operations.

Carriage Hills Apartments:  For 2001 the Partnership has budgeted  approximately
$376,000 for capital improvements,  consisting primarily of heating upgrades and
floor   covering  and  appliance   replacements.   The   Partnership   completed
approximately  $121,000 in capital  expenditures at Carriage Hills Apartments as
of March 31, 2001,  consisting primarily of structural building improvements and
floor covering replacement. These improvements were funded from operations.

The additional  capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available
from  operations  and  Partnership  reserves.  To the extent that such  budgeted
capital improvements are completed, the Registrant's distributable cash flow, if
any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The  Registrant's  current assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term
needs  (exclusive  of capital  improvements)  of the  Registrant.  The  mortgage
indebtedness of approximately $8,616,000,  net of discount, matures October 2003
and December  2004 with balloon  payments due at maturity.  The General  Partner
will attempt to refinance such indebtedness  and/or sell the properties prior to
such  maturity  dates.  If the  properties  cannot be  refinanced  or sold for a
sufficient  amount,  the  Registrant  will risk losing such  properties  through
foreclosure.

A distribution of approximately  $130,000 was paid during the three months ended
March 31, 2000,  which was declared and accrued at December 31, 1999. There were
no distributions to the limited partners during the three months ended March 31,
2001. Future cash  distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated
from  operations,  the  availability  of cash  reserves  and the  timing of debt
maturities,  refinancings,  and/or property sales. The Registrant's distribution
policy is reviewed on a quarterly  basis.  There can be no  assurance,  however,
that the  Partnership  will generate  sufficient  funds from  operations,  after
required  capital  expenditures,  to permit any additional  distributions to its
partners in 2001 or subsequent  periods.  Distributions may be restricted by the
requirements  to deposit net operating  income (as defined in the mortgage note)
into the Reserve  Account until the Reserve Account is funded in an amount equal
to $200 to $400 per  apartment  unit  for  Greentree  Apartments  for a total of
approximately  $36,000 to $71,000.  As of March 31, 2001,  the  Partnership  has
deposits of approximately $72,000 in the reserve account.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  currently own 9,751 limited  partnership
units in the Partnership  representing 52.35% of the outstanding units. A number
of these  units were  acquired  pursuant  to tender  offers made by AIMCO or its
affiliates.  It is possible that AIMCO or its  affiliates  will make one or more
additional offers to acquire  additional  limited  partnership  interests in the
Partnership  for cash or in exchange for units in the operating  partnership  of
AIMCO. Under the Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders  holding a majority of the
Units are  entitled to take action with  respect to a variety of matters,  which
would  include  without   limitation,   voting  on  certain  amendments  to  the
Partnership  Agreement and voting to remove the General Partner.  As a result of
its  ownership  of 52.35% of the  outstanding  units,  AIMCO is in a position to
influence all voting  decisions with respect to the  Registrant.  When voting on
matters,  AIMCO would in all  likelihood  vote the Units it acquired in a manner
favorable to the interest of the General Partner because of its affiliation with
the General Partner.


<PAGE>




                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial  Group,  Inc., et al. in the Superior Court of the State of California
for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs  named as defendants,  among others,
the   Partnership,   its  General  Partner  and  several  of  their   affiliated
partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action  purports to assert claims on
behalf of a class of limited  partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of
limited  partnerships  (including  the  Partnership)  which are named as nominal
defendants,  challenging the acquisition of interests in certain general partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities which were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units; the management of partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the  Insignia  Merger.  The  plaintiffs  seek
monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial  dissolution of the
Partnership.  On June 25,  1998,  the  General  Partner  filed a motion  seeking
dismissal of the action.  In lieu of  responding to the motion,  the  plaintiffs
have filed an amended  complaint.  The General  Partner  filed  demurrers to the
amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  The demurrer is scheduled to be heard on May 14, 2001.  The
Court has also  scheduled  a hearing  on a motion  for class  certification  for
August 27, 2001.  Plaintiffs must file their motion for class  certification  no
later than June 15, 2001.  The General  Partner does not  anticipate  that costs
associated  with  this  case  will  be  material  to the  Partnership's  overall
operations.

The Partnership is a party to certain legal actions resulting from its operating
activities.  These actions are routine litigation and administrative proceedings
arising in the  ordinary  course of business  and none of which are  expected to
have a  material  adverse  effect on the  consolidated  financial  condition  or
results of operations of the Partnership.


<PAGE>



ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a)    Exhibits:

                  None.

            b)    Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended March 31, 2001.




<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                               ANGELES PARTNERS X

                                 By:     Angeles Realty Corporation
                                         Its General Partner

                                 By:     /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                         Patrick J. Foye
                                         Executive Vice President

                                 By:     /s/Martha L. Long
                                         Martha L. Long
                                         Senior Vice President and
                                         Controller

                                 Date:  May 14, 2001