alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2289 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2289

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
of Agriculture, Foreign Assistance and Related Programs, Office of the 
 Under Secretary for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the 
     Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
of Agriculture, Foreign Assistance and Related Programs, Office of the 
 Under Secretary for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR US DEPARTMENT OF 
              AGRICULTURE, FOREIGN ASSISTANCE AND RELATED PROGRAMS, 
              OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY FOR TRADE AND FOREIGN 
              AGRICULTURAL AFFAIRS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for US Department of 
Agriculture, Foreign Assistance and Related Programs, Office of the 
Under Secretary for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs for fiscal 
year 2024 may not exceed $875,000.
                                 <all>
```
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in

the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12

- 405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer

generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

No. A
- 1
- CA
- 41489 HOLLY CHARLEY,

Petitioner

- Ap pellant,

v. DEAUNTAE RICHARDS, Respondent

- Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MCKINLEY COUNTY Douglas W. Decker, District Court Judge New Mexico Legal Aid, Inc. Lucrecia R. Jaramillo Albuquerque, NM for Appellant

Deauntae Richards Gallup, NM
Pro Se Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION BOGARDUS, Judge. {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing the proposed disposition has been filed, and the time for doi ng so has expired. REVERSED

. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. KRISTINA BOGARDUS, JudgeWE CONCUR:

MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7837

LARRY S. WILLIAMS-EL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES DUNNING, Sheriff, Alexandria Detention

Center; RICHARD R. RUSCAK, Undersheriff,

Alexandria Detention Center; DEBRA L. PIERSON,

Captain of Security, Alexandria Detention

Center; JOHN L. GRIGGS, Captain for Inmate

Service, Alexandria Detention Center; SERGEANT

REYNOLDS, Watch Commander (A-1), Alexandria

Detention Center; DEPUTY JACOBSON (A-1),

Alexandria Detention Center,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

C. S. CHAPMAN, Deputy, (A-1), Alexandria

Detention Center; EDWARD MURRAY, Director for

the Department of Corrections,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CA-93-698-N)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996
2

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry S. Williams-El, Appellant Pro Se. Jack L. Gould, Fairfax,

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal

period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an

extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day

period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to

relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established

by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v.

Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting

United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district

court entered its order on Oct. 4, 1995; Appellant's notice of

appeal was filed on Nov. 15, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a

timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives

this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2282 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2282

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
 of Agriculture, Rural Business--Cooperative Service, Rural Energy for 
                 America Program for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
 of Agriculture, Rural Business--Cooperative Service, Rural Energy for 
                 America Program for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR US DEPARTMENT OF 
              AGRICULTURE, RURAL BUSINESS--COOPERATIVE SERVICE, RURAL 
              ENERGY FOR AMERICA PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for US Department of 
Agriculture, Rural Business--Cooperative Service, Rural Energy for 
America Program for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $334,500.
                                 <all>
```
#### David J. Doyaga et al., Appellants, v Teleeba, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[828 NYS2d 443]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rings County (Hinds-Radix, J.), dated September 2, 2005, which granted the motion of the defendant Gabriel Yakubovich, and the separate motion of the defendants Teleeba, Inc., and Mohamed A. Salama, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff Walter Teruel did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The defendants met their respective prima facie burdens on their motions for summary judgment demonstrating that the plaintiff Walter Teruel did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]; *see also Kearse v New York City Tr. Auth.,*16 AD3d 45 [2005]). Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, in opposition, they failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The affidavit of the plaintiffs’ treating physician was insufficient to establish the existence of a serious injury since it relied on the unsworn reports of other doctors *(see Friedman v U-Haul Truck Rental,*216 AD2d 266 [1995]; *see also Ramirez v Parache,*31 AD3d 415 [2006]; *Vallejo v Builders for Family Youth, Diocese of Brooklyn, Inc.,*18 AD3d 741 [2005]; *Mahoney v Zerillo,*6 AD3d 403 [2004]). In the absence of any objective medical evidence that Walter Teruel sustained a serious injury, his self-serving affidavit was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Felix v New York City Tr. Auth.,*32 AD3d 527 [2006]; *Ramirez v Parache,*31 AD3d 415 [2006]; *see e.g. Fisher v Williams,*289 AD2d 288 [2001]). In this regard, the plaintiffs failed to proffer competent medical evidence indicating that Walter Teruel was unable to perform substantially all of his daily activities for not less than 90 out of the *799first 180 days as a result of the subject accident *(see Felix v New York City Tr. Auth., supra; Ramirez v Parache, supra; Sainte-Aime v Ho,*274 AD2d 569 [2000]). Florio, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Covello, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Howard Marnell, Appellant, v Robert Dennison, as Chair of the New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

[824 NYS2d 812]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ceresia, Jr., J.), entered May 18, 2006 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

In 1983, petitioner was convicted upon his plea of guilty of murder in the second degree for the beating and stabbing death of his sister-in-law and was sentenced to a prison term of 15 years to life. In May 2005, he made his fifth appearance before the Board of Parole and his request for parole release was again denied. After that determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging it. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, prompting this appeal.

Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the Board’s decision denying his request for parole release does not exhibit “ ‘irrationality bordering on impropriety’ ” *(Matter of Silmon v Travis,*95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000], quoting *Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*50 NY2d 69, 77 [1980]). The record reflects that the Board took into account the appropriate statutory factors in rendering its determination, including petitioner’s excellent disciplinary record, positive institutional and educational achievements, and postrelease plans *(see*Executive Law § 259-i; *Matter of Dorman v New York State Bd. of Parole,*30 AD3d 880, 881 [2006]; *Matter of Olivera v Dennison,*22 AD3d 949 [2005]). Although the Board emphasized the violent nature of the instant offense, it was not required to give each factor equal weight *(see Matter of Thompson v New York State Div. of Parole,*30 AD3d 746 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 716 [2006]; *Matter of Ward v New York State Div. of Parole,*26 AD3d 712, 713 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 702 [2006]).

Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claims that the denial effectively constitutes resentencing and that it was made in accordance with an unwritten executive policy to deny parole release to violent felons, have been reviewed and determined to be without merit.

*996Peters, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 2 (this
“Amendment”), dated as of August 6, 2015, is made by and between Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and James Nielsen (the “Executive”). 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to an employment agreement dated as of April 18, 2011 (the “Employment
Agreement”), as amended on March 12, 2014; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement as provided
below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual agreements herein contained, the parties hereby agree as follows, in each
case effective as of August 6, 2015: 
 1. Amendment to Section 1.1. Section 1.1 shall hereby be amended to read as follows:

 During the Employment Period (as defined in Section 2 hereof), the Executive’s title shall be “President and Chief Operating
Officer” of the Company. 
 2. Amendment to Section 1.2. The first sentence of Section 1.2 shall hereby be amended to read as
follows: 
 The Executive shall have the executive and managerial powers and duties as may reasonably be assigned to the Executive from time to time by
the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”); provided that such duties are commensurate with the reasonable and customary duties of a President and Chief Operating Officer of similarly situated companies in the
Company’s industry. 
 3. Amendment to Section 3.1(a). Section 3.1(a) shall hereby be amended by replacing “$325,000”
with “$500,000”. 
 4. Amendment to Section 3.2. Section 3.2 shall hereby be amended by replacing 60% with 70%. 

5. Amendment to Section 3.5. Section 3.5 shall hereby be amended to read as follows: 

Executive Stock Option. As soon as practicable after August 6, 2015, the Company shall grant the Executive an option to purchase 500,000
shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price per share equal to the fair market value per share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The option shall be granted pursuant to the Company’s 2013 Incentive
Plan, and evidenced by the Company’s standard form of grant agreement. 







 6. Amendment to Section 4.3(e). Clause (i) of Section 4.3(e) shall hereby be amended
by replacing “Chief Operating Officer” with “President and Chief Operating Officer” each time it appears therein. 
 7.
Counterparts. This Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument. 

8. Ratification. All other provisions of the Employment Agreement remain unchanged and are hereby ratified by the Company and Executive. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective as of the day and year first set forth above. 

 

			
	Company
	
	 Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.,

        a Delaware corporation

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Steven Townsend

	Name:	 	Steven Townsend
	Title:	 	Chairman of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
		
		 	Executive
		
	By:	 	 /s/ James Nielsen

		 	James Nielsen



  
 2
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of iBasis, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company),
does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:  The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form 10-K)
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: March 13, 2009
  /s/ Ofer GneezyOfer GneezyPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date: March 13, 2009
  /s/ Richard TennantRichard TennantSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 31.01

       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                       2002 (Rule 13a-14(a) Certification)


I, Jerome K. Thorson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of 3Si
Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date");
and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
Registrant's internal controls; and

6. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                                       By:/s/ Jerome K. Thorson
                                      Jerome K. Thorson, President/CEO
Date:   November 13, 2003
#### Nikki Pagan, Respondent-Appellant, v Frank Rafter, Appellant-Respondent.

[972 NYS2d 140]

— Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present— Smith, J.P, Peradotto, Garni and Valentino, JJ.
Order entered January 16, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01410-CV

IN RE NUSRAT PERVEEN, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-06933

ORDER

On December 22, 2017, the Court abated this cause following notification that a petition 

for bankruptcy concerning relator Nusrat Perveen had been filed in the United States Bankruptcy 

Court for the Northern District of Texas. Relator has informed the Court that the bankruptcy 

court lifted the automatic stay on January 5, 2018. Relator requests that this proceeding 

continue. We treat relator’s request as a motion to reinstate this proceeding.

Because the stay has been lifted, the Court GRANTS the motion to reinstate, LIFTS the 

Court’s December 22, 2017 abatement, and DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to return this cause 

to the Court’s active docket. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.3(a). 

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2138 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2138

 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
   Agencies, Postal Regulatory Commission, Salaries and Expenses for 
                           fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
   Agencies, Postal Regulatory Commission, Salaries and Expenses for 
                           fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR INDEPENDENT 
              AGENCIES, POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION, SALARIES AND 
              EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Independent Agencies, 
Postal Regulatory Commission, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 
2024 may not exceed $15,200,000.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          53,823
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  170,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,605
<INVENTORY>                                    163,201
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               394,654
<PP&E>                                         421,886
<DEPRECIATION>                                 264,222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 637,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,257
<BONDS>                                         51,101
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,027
<OTHER-SE>                                     464,116
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   637,765
<SALES>                                        576,658
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               576,658
<CGS>                                          392,829
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  392,829
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               156,240
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   818
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,087
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,440
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,373
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,067
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,067
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21


</TABLE>