alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          25,842
<SECURITIES>                                       195
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,152
<INVENTORY>                                      6,595
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,665
<PP&E>                                          11,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,078
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,840
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,727
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           848
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,840
<SALES>                                          4,584
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,584
<CGS>                                            4,408
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (738)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,552)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,552)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,552)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001

Commission file number 333-57027

ABN AMRO Mortgage Corporation (as depositor under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
Dated as of July 1, 1999 providing for, inter alia, the issuance of ABN AMRO Mortgage
Corporation Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1999-5)
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of  incorporation or organization)

363886007
(I.R.S. Employer  Identification No.)

181 West Madison Street, Chicago, Illinois  60602
(Address of principal executive offices)

60602
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (248)  643-2530

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
           Yes [X]       No  [ ]

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A amends Item 14 of the original Form
10-K which was filed on March 26, 2002


      Item 14.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.

	(a)	Exhibits

		(99.1)	Annual Independent Accountant's Servicing Report

		(99.2)	Annual Statement of Compliance

	(b) 	Reports on Form 8-K were filed during the last quarter of 2001 in order to provide
statements for the monthly distributions to investors on September 27, 2001,
October 25, 2001, November 27, 2001, and December 26, 2001.

Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 are not filed herewith since documents were not received at least
three business days prior to the due date of this report.  The documents will be included in the
Form 10-K/A to be filed within 30 days of the receipt of such documents.



				SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

LaSalle Bank National Association, in its
capacity as Agent for the Trustee under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement on behalf of  ABN AMRO Mortgage
Corporation, Registrant


By:	/s/  	Cynthia Reis
	---------------------------
		Cynthia Reis
		First Vice President

Date:	May 21, 2002
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2092 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for District of Columbia, 

Federal Payment for the DC Courts, DC Court of Appeals for fiscal 

year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for District of Columbia, Federal Payment for the DC Courts, 

DC Court of Appeals for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL PAYMENT 

5 FOR THE DC COURTS, DC COURT OF APPEALS 

6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for District of Columbia, Federal Payment for the 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2092 IH

1 DC Courts, DC Court of Appeals for fiscal year 2024 may 

2 not exceed $14,594,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### In the Matter of an Application for a Subsequent Retention Order Pursuant to CPL 330.20 in Relation to S.J., Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

[974 NYS2d 856]

— Appeal, by permission of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, from an order of the Monroe County Court (Vincent M. Dinolfo, J.), dated August 6, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to CPL 330.20 (9). The order determined that respondent is mentally ill and authorized the Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Health to continue to retain respondent in a nonsecure facility for care and treatment until July 2, 2013.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: In this proceeding under CPL 330.20, respondent appeals from an order determining that he is mentally ill *(see*CPL 330.20 [1] [d]), and authorizing the Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Health to continue to retain him in a nonsecure facility for care and treatment until July 2, 2013. We dismiss the appeal as moot. The order has expired by its own terms and was superseded by an order subsequently entered, and the issues raised are not sufficiently substantial or novel to warrant invoking the exception to the mootness doctrine *(see Matter of David C.,*69 NY2d 796, 798 [1987]; *Matter of Zheng Z. [South Beach Psychiatric Ctr.],*68 AD3d 886, 887 [2009]).

Even assuming, arguendo, that the exception to the mootness doctrine applies, we conclude that a fair interpretation of the evidence supports County Court’s determination *(see Matter of Rabinowitz v James M.,*63 AD3d 481, 481 [2009]). Present— Scudder, EJ., Centra, Garni, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

THOMAS RADFORD, :

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : CIVIL ACTION 14-00527-KD-C

:

C. MARSHALL, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to 

the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and 

Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated January 7, 2015, is ADOPTED

as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED the Plaintiff’s motions for 

preliminary injunction (Docs. 10, 12) are DENIED without prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED this the 29th day of January 2015.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:14-cv-00527-KD-C Document 22 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Martha L. Long, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Angeles Partners X;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



|                      
|----------------------
|Date: November 7, 2007

/s/Martha L. Long

Martha L. Long

Senior Vice President of Angeles Realty Corporation, equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JAMES DOUGLAS LEWIS, JR., :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 15-0352-KD-M

HALLIE S. DIXON, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, 

and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of 

the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is 

adopted as the opinion of this Court.

Accordingly, this action is dismissed, prior to service of 

process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) 

because Plaintiff’s claims are either frivolous or fail to state 

a claim upon which relief can be granted. The frivolous claims 

are dismissed with prejudice and the claims that failed to state 

a claim upon which relief can be granted are dismissed without 

prejudice.

DONE this the 22nd day of December 2015.

s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00352-KD-M Document 5 Filed 12/23/15 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30140]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting

DATES AND TIMES:  January 7, 2015, at 2 p.m.

PLACE: Washington, DC, via Teleconference.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Wednesday, January 7, 2015, at 2 p.m.

    1. Strategic Issues.
    2. Financial Matters.
    3. Pricing.
    4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.
    5. Governors' Executive Session--Discussion of prior agenda items 
and Board Governance.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC, 
20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30140 Filed 12-22-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 12 (A)


                           DORAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        SIX-MONTH PERIOD
                                                                       ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
                                                                       -------------------

<S>                                                                    <C>
INCLUDING INTEREST ON DEPOSITS

EARNINGS:
     Pre-tax income from continuing operations                               $ 37,930
Plus:
     Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)                            66,500
                                                                             --------

TOTAL EARNINGS                                                               $104,430
                                                                             ========

FIXED CHARGES:
     Interest expensed and capitalized                                       $ 65,251
     Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized
        expenses related to indebtedness                                          611
     An estimate of the interest component within rental expense                  712
                                                                             --------

TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                                            66,574
                                                                             ========


RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                               1.57
                                                                             ========




EXCLUDING INTEREST ON DEPOSITS

EARNINGS:
     Pre-tax income from continuing operations                               $ 37,930
Plus:
     Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)                            51,935
                                                                             --------

TOTAL EARNINGS                                                               $ 89,865
                                                                             ========

FIXED CHARGES:
     Interest expensed and capitalized                                       $ 50,686
     Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized
        expenses related to indebtedness                                          611
     An estimate of the interest component within rental expense                  712
                                                                             --------

TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                                          $ 52,009
                                                                             ========


RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERENCE SECURITY DIVIDENDS             1.73
                                                                             ========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1 10Q Qtr 2 2015






EXHIBIT 10.1


TERMS OF AMENDED AND RESTATED CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT


The form of Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement (the “Agreement”), filed as Exhibit 10.2 Registrant’s Quarterly Report on From 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014 contains blanks where the multiple of the executive’s base amount and the term of continued benefits provided under the Agreement vary for certain executives. On June 1, 2015, the Registrant entered into such an Agreement with the executive officer below, providing continued benefits for the term, and at the multiple of such executive's base amount, as listed in the following chart:






	
			
	Executive Officer
	Number of Times Base Amount Section (4a)
	Term of Continued Benefits Section (4 b & c)

	William K. Wray
	2 times
	24 months

	Senior Vice President, Risk Management
NO. 07-09-0039-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

SEPTEMBER 28, 2009

______________________________

JASON E. STEELY, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2007-417068; HONORABLE CECIL G. PURYEAR, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Following a plea of not guilty, Appellant, Jason E. Steely, was convicted by a jury

of possession of a controlled substance, a state jail felony. The jury sentenced Appellant

to nineteen months in a state jail facility. Pending before this Court is Appellant’s Motion

to Dismiss Appeal in which he requests that this Court withdraw his notice of appeal and
2

dismiss the appeal. As required by Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure, the motion is signed by Appellant and his attorney. No decision of this Court

having been delivered, the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. No motion for

rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice

Do not publish.
#### In the Matter of Trey C. and Another, Children Alleged to be Abused. Amber C., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

[973 NYS2d 561]

Orders of fact-finding and disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Karen I. Lupuloff, J.), entered on or about October 18, 2012, which, inter alia, upon respondent’s default, determined that respondent, a person legally responsible for the subject children, abused the child Annyika B. and derivatively abused the child Trey C., and directed respondent to comply with the terms and conditions specified in an order of protection, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the matter remanded for a new fact-finding hearing.

The court erred in entering the orders on respondent’s alleged default. Her failure to appear at the scheduled hearing dates did not constitute a default inasmuch as her counsel was present, stated that she wished to proceed, and affirmed that she had respondent’s authorization to do so *(see Matter of Bradley M.M. [Michael M.*— Cindy *M.],*98 AD3d 1257 [4th Dept 2012]; *Matter of Shemeco D.,*265 AD2d 860 [4th Dept 1999]; *cf. Matter of Aaron C. [Grace C.],*105 AD3d 548, 548-549 [1st Dept 2013]; *Matter of Jaquan Tieran B. [Latoya B.],*105 AD3d 498, 499 [1st Dept 2013]). Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Feinman and Clark, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2046 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2046

   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related 
Agencies, Railroad Retirement Board, Dual Benefits Payments Account for 
                           fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related 
Agencies, Railroad Retirement Board, Dual Benefits Payments Account for 
                           fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RELATED AGENCIES, 
              RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, DUAL BENEFITS PAYMENTS ACCOUNT 
              FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Related Agencies, 
Railroad Retirement Board, Dual Benefits Payments Account for fiscal 
year 2024 may not exceed $11,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
#### John ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. George PAYNE; Gaston Riley; Phil Taylor; Damon Reese; T P Willis; Phillip Compton; Michael Neill, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-60874.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 2, 2008.

John Anderson Gulfport, MS, pro se.

Cyril T. Faneca, Jr., Haley N. Broom, Dukes, Dukes, Keating & Faneca, Patrick Timothy Bergin, Butler, Snow, O’Mara, Stevens & Cannada, Gulfport, MS, Wilkins, Stephens & Tipton, Jackson, MS, John Fitzgerald Hughes, Lee & Hughes, Greenville, MS, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before JOLLY, PRADO and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

John Anderson, Mississippi prisoner # 279672, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint following a bench trial. Anderson alleged that he was the victim of constitutionally excessive force at the hands of correctional officer Thomas Wills.

We review findings of fact made following a bench trial for clear error and legal conclusions de novo. *Baldwin v. Stalder,*137 F.3d 836, 839 (5th Cir.1998). A review of the record, including the trial transcript, establishes that the district court’s credibility findings are supported by the evidence. Additionally, the evidence supports the conclusion that although Anderson sustained more than a de minimis physical injury, the need for the use of force was legitimate, the threat perceived by Wills was reasonable given Anderson’s noncompliance, and Wills adequately tempered the severity of the use of force. *See id.*at 838. Anderson has not shown that the district court’s findings on his claims of excessive force were clearly erroneous. *See Canal Barge Co. v. Torco Oil Co.,*220 F.3d 370, 375 (5th Cir.2000).

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO EXPEDITE APPEAL DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.