alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
FOR PPL CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2004

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I, the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

| |  | The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                             
| |  | The information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Date:  May 7, 2004 | /s/ William F. HechtWilliam F. Hecht
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
PPL Corporation
|------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

October 23 , 2015

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 2014

- 5127

L OUIS J. B ALESTRA , J R ., P HYLLIS B ALESTRA , Plaintiffs

- Appellants

v.

U NITED S TATES , Defendant

- Appellee

De cided: October 13, 2015 P recedential Opinion

______________________ Please make the following change s:

Page 6 , line s 21

– 22 , change “ The trial court also d e nied as moot the Balestras’ motion to amend their complaint to add a defense. ” to “The trial court also denied the Go vernment’s motion to amend the answer to add a defense.”

Page 18 , line 33 to page 19, line 2 , change “With regard to the trial court’s denial of the Balestras’ motion to amend their complaint, we agree with the trial court that, in ligh t of the disposition of their case, the motion is moot.” to “With regard to the trial court’s denial of the Gover nment’s motion to amend the answer, we agree with thetrial court that, in light of the disposition of the case, the motion is moot.”
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7421** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ISAIAH MILLER, a/k/a I , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Terry L. Wooten , Chief District Judge. ( 4:05

- cr - 00036

- TLW

- 1 )

Submitted : February 23, 2016 Decided: February 25, 2016

Before MOTZ and GREGORY , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Isaiah Miller , Appellant Pro Se. William Norman Nettles, U nited States Attorney , Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Isaia h Miller appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of
sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Miller , No. 4:05

- cr - 00036

- TLW

1 (D.S.C. Aug. 20, 2015). We grant Miller leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny his motions for a transcript at government expense and to have a verbatim transcript ordered. We dispense with oral argument be cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6226
ERIC LAMONT WILKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KENNETH L. OSBORNE, Warden; J. W. ARMENTROUT, Assistant Warden, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1054-R) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: May 2, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric Lamont Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint without prejudice. Because a dismissal without prejudice is generally not appealable, we dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1887 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1887

   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of 
      Representatives, Salaries and Expenses of the Office of the 
             Whistleblower Ombudsman for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of 
      Representatives, Salaries and Expenses of the Office of the 
             Whistleblower Ombudsman for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR HOUSE OF 
              REPRESENTATIVES, SALARIES AND EXPENSES OF THE OFFICE OF 
              THE WHISTLEBLOWER OMBUDSMAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for House of Representatives, 
Salaries and Expenses of the Office of the Whistleblower Ombudsman for 
fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $0.00.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2198 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2198

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Environmental 
 Protection Agency, State and Tribal Assistance Grants, Environmental 
           Information Exchange Network for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Environmental 
 Protection Agency, State and Tribal Assistance Grants, Environmental 
           Information Exchange Network for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL 
              PROTECTION AGENCY, STATE AND TRIBAL ASSISTANCE GRANTS, 
              ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION EXCHANGE NETWORK FOR FISCAL 
              YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Environmental Protection 
Agency, State and Tribal Assistance Grants, Environmental Information 
Exchange Network for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $0.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2277 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2277

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
of Agriculture, Rural Development Programs, Rural Community Facilities 
                 Program Account for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
of Agriculture, Rural Development Programs, Rural Community Facilities 
                 Program Account for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR US DEPARTMENT OF 
              AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS, RURAL COMMUNITY 
              FACILITIES PROGRAM ACCOUNT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for US Department of 
Agriculture, Rural Development Programs, Rural Community Facilities 
Program Account for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $2,800,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Angeles Partners X 1998 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000317900
<NAME> ANGELES PARTNERS X
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998   
<CASH>                                           1,345
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          15,221
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,810   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,693   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         12,515     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,431)    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,693    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,506    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,893    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 938    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,798     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    95.57<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Matrix Energy Services Corporation (the "Company"), on Form
10-QSB, as amended, for the period ending September, 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
Joe Bill Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ Joe Bill Bennett
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joe Bill Bennett, Chief Executive Officer

May 10, 2004



<PAGE>


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Matrix Energy Services Corporation (the "Company"), on Form
10-QSB, as amended, for the period ending September, 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
Mark S. Zouvas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ Mark S. Zouvas
-----------------------------------------------------
Mark S. Zouvas, Chief Financial Officer

May 10, 2004
#### VACUUM CLEANER CO. v. DUNN.

(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

January 30, 1911.)

1 Patents (§ 271*) — Infringement—Actions—Pleas.

A plea in an action for infringement of a patent, which seeks to present the defense that the patentee is not the original and sole inventor of the combination set forth in the several claims, presents a defense enumerated as such in Rev. St. § 4920 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3394), and must be presented by answer.

[Ed. Note. — For other eases, see Patent's, Dec. Dig. § 271.*]

2. Patents (§ 271*) — Infringement—Actions—Pleas.

A plea in an action for infringement of a patent, which attempts to unite two defenses, and where a part of the proposed proof relates to only one of the claims of the patent, is bad, under the rule that a plea, to be good, must present a single issue, which, if decided in favor of defendant, disposes of the action.

[Ed. Note. — For other eases, see Patent's, Dec. Dig. § 271.*]

In Equity. Suit by the Vacuum Cleaner Company against Elias B. Dunn, doing business under the trade-name of Dunn’s Improved Vacuum System. On motion to strike off plea. Granted, .with leave to answer.

Timothy D. Merwin, for complainant.

Edwin J. Prindle, for defendant.

*

For otter eases see same topic & § number in Dee. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

COXE, Circuit Judge.

Counsel for the defendant asks leave to amend his plea by inserting at the end of the third paragraph the words “and that said Andrew Kenney was not an employee of the said David T. Kenney.” This request is granted and the plea may be so amended.

[1] The amended plea seeks, inter alia, to present the defense that the patentee is not the original and sole inventor of the combination set forth in the several claims. This is a defense enumerated as such in section 4920 of the Revised Statutes (U S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3394) and should be presented by answer.

[2] Again, the plea is bad because it attempts to unite two defenses and part of the proposed proof relates to one only of the claims of the patent. If the issue were joined on the plea and the alleged facts were .determined in favor of the defendant, it would not necessarily dispose of the case. A plea to be good should present a single issue which, if decided in favor of the defendant, will dispose of the action. Schnauffer v. Aste (C. C.) 148 Fed. 867; Korn v. Wiebusch (C. C.) 33 Fed. 50; Glucose Co. v. Douglas (C. C.) 145 Fed. 949.

The motion to strike off the plea is granted, the defendant to answer within 20 dáys from the date of the order.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 248 (Monday, December 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 78108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30426]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation

[RR83550000, 145R5065C6, RX.59389832.1009676]


Change in Discount Rate for Water Resources Planning

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of change.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Water Resources Planning Act of 1965 and the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1974 require an annual determination of a 
discount rate for Federal water resources planning. The discount rate 
for Federal water resources planning for fiscal year 2015 is 3.375 
percent. Discounting is to be used to convert future monetary values to 
present values.

DATES: This discount rate is to be used for the period October 1, 2014, 
through and including September 30, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Max Millstein, Bureau of Reclamation, 
Reclamation Law Administration Division, Denver, Colorado 80225; 
telephone: 303-445-2853.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the interest 
rate to be used by Federal agencies in the formulation and evaluation 
of plans for water and related land resources is 3.375 percent for 
fiscal year 2015.
    This rate has been computed in accordance with Section 80(a), Pub. 
L. 93-251 (88 Stat. 34), and 18 CFR 704.39, which: (1) Specify that the 
rate will be based upon the average yield during the preceding fiscal 
year on interest-bearing marketable securities of the United States 
which, at the time the computation is made, have terms of 15 years or 
more remaining to maturity (average yield is rounded to nearest one-
eighth percent); and (2) provide that the rate will not be raised or 
lowered more than one-quarter of 1 percent for any year. The U.S. 
Department of the Treasury calculated the specified average to be 
3.3378 percent. This rate, rounded to the nearest one-eighth percent, 
is 3.375 percent, which is a change of less than the allowable one-
quarter of 1 percent. Therefore, the fiscal year 2015 rate is 3.375 
percent.
    The rate of 3.375 percent will be used by all Federal agencies in 
the formulation and evaluation of water and related land resources 
plans for the purpose of discounting future benefits and computing 
costs or otherwise converting benefits and costs to a common-time 
basis.

    Dated: November 20, 2014.
 Roseann Gonzales,
 Director, Policy and Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-30426 Filed 12-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332-90-P
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-140134, 333-131826, 333-130585, 333-62968, 333-58982, 333-52490 and 333-47764) and S-8 (Nos. 333-136302, 333-127705, 333-106673, 333-118084, 333-63902, 333-52488, 333-43220, 333-94817, and
333-92729) of The TriZetto Group, Inc., of our reports dated February 16, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of The TriZetto Group, Inc., managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of The TriZetto Group, Inc., included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Orange County,
California

March 12, 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

JOHNNIE WHITE, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. CA 05-0243-BH-C

:

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security, :

Defendant.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to

the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated January 6, 2006, that

the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff disability insurance

benefits and supplemental security income be affirmed, is ADOPTED as the opinion of

this Court.

DONE this 6th day of February, 2006.

 s/ W. B. Hand 

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00243-BH-C Document 21 Filed 02/06/06 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7190

DEMARCUS CORBITT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus BOYD BENNETT, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cv-00829-NCT) Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 20, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Demarcus Corbitt, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Demarcus Corbitt seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Corbitt has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Corbitt’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED