UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

                   For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003


[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


               For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-10304


                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)



         California                                              95-3557899
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

<PAGE>

                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION



ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                                 March 31, 2003

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Assets
<S>                                                                       <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                              $    191
   Receivables and deposits                                                     27
   Restricted escrows                                                           51
   Other assets                                                                 58
   Investment properties:
      Land                                                     $ 312
      Buildings and related personal property                   10,649
                                                                10,961
      Less accumulated depreciation                             (8,234)      2,727
                                                                          $  3,054

Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                       $     32
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                          38
   Accrued property taxes                                                       69
   Due to General Partner and affiliates                                        56
   Other liabilities                                                           119
   Mortgage notes payable                                                    8,364

Partners' Deficit
   General partners                                           $ (248)
   Limited partners (18,625 units issued and
      outstanding)                                             (5,376)      (5,624)
                                                                          $  3,054

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)

                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                                March 31,
                                                            2003        2002
Revenues:
   Rental income                                          $  562      $  589
   Other income                                               56          55
      Total revenues                                         618         644

Expenses:
   Operating                                                 264         235
   General and administrative                                 40          49
   Depreciation                                              132         130
   Interest                                                  171         172
   Property taxes                                             57          53
      Total expenses                                         664         639

Net (loss) income                                         $  (46)     $    5

Net (loss) income allocated to general partners (1%)      $   --      $   --

Net (loss) income allocated to limited partners (99%)        (46)          5

                                                          $  (46)     $    5

Net (loss) income per limited partnership unit            $(2.47)     $  .27


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


<PAGE>

                                ANGELES PARTNERS X
              CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                      Limited
                                     Partnership     General      Limited
                                        Units        Partners    Partners     Total

<S>                                    <C>             <C>        <C>        <C>
Original capital contributions         18,714          $ 1        $18,714    $18,715

Partners' deficit at
   December 31, 2002                   18,625        $ (248)     $(5,330)    $(5,578)

Net loss for the three months
   ended March 31, 2003                    --             --         (46)         (46)

Partners' deficit
   at March 31, 2003                   18,625        $ (248)     $(5,376)     $(5,624)

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                       March 31,
                                                                   2003        2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                             <C>          <C>
  Net (loss) income                                             $   (46)     $     5
  Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash
   provided by operating activities:
   Depreciation                                                     132          130
   Amortization of discounts and loan costs                          11           10
  Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                        3            6
      Other assets                                                    4          (64)
      Accounts payable                                              (37)         (37)
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                             1            4
      Accrued property taxes                                         (4)          13
      Due to General Partner and affiliates                          56           (1)
      Other liabilities                                              30           95

       Net cash provided by operating activities                    150          161

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                            (20)         (25)
  Net withdrawals from restricted escrows                            35           35

       Net cash provided by investing activities                     15           10

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage notes payable                                (36)         (33)
  Payments on advances from General Partner                         (49)         (36)

       Net cash used in financing activities                        (85)         (69)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents                            80          102

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                    111           84

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                      $   191      $   186

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest                                          $   159      $   164

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Angeles Partners
X (the  "Partnership"  or  "Registrant")  have been prepared in accordance  with
generally accepted accounting  principles for interim financial  information and
with  the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and Item  310(b)  of  Regulation  S-B.
Accordingly,  they do not include all of the information and footnotes  required
by generally accepted accounting  principles for complete financial  statements.
The general partner responsible for management of the Partnership's  business is
Angeles Realty  Corporation (the "General  Partner" or "ARC"). In the opinion of
the General Partner,  all adjustments  (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.  Operating
results for the three  month  period  ended  March 31, 2003 are not  necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending  December 31,
2003. For further  information,  refer to the consolidated  financial statements
and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended  December  31,  2002.  The General  Partner is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"),  a publicly
traded real estate investment trust.

Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the General Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The Partnership  Agreement  provides for (i) certain  payments to affiliates for
services and (ii)  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on
behalf of the Partnership.

During the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, affiliates of the General
Partner  were  entitled to receive 5% of gross  receipts  from the  Registrant's
properties for providing property  management  services.  The Registrant paid to
such  affiliates  approximately  $25,000 and $32,000 for the three month periods
ended  March 31, 2003 and 2002,  respectively.  These  amounts  are  included in
operating expenses.

An  affiliate  of the General  Partner  received  reimbursement  of  accountable
administrative  expenses amounting to approximately  $18,000 and $35,000 for the
three  months  ended March 31, 2003 and 2002,  respectively.  These  amounts are
included in general  and  administrative  expenses  and  investment  properties.
Included in these amounts are fees related to construction  management  services
provided by an affiliate of the General Partner of approximately  $3,000 for the
three  months  ended March 31,  2002.  There were no such fees  incurred for the
three months ended March 31, 2003. The construction  management service fees are
calculated based on a percentage of current additions to investment properties.

In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, the General Partner has loaned the
Partnership  funds to cover capital  improvements  at Greentree  Apartments  and
Carriage  Hills  Apartments.  At March 31, 2003,  the amount of the  outstanding
loans and accrued interest was  approximately  $50,000 and is included in due to
General  Partner and  affiliates.  Interest is charged at the prime rate plus 2%
(6.25% at March 31, 2003).  Interest  expense was  approximately  $1,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002.  During the three months ended March
31, 2003 and 2002,  the  Partnership  made principal  payments of  approximately
$49,000 and $36,000, respectively, and interest payments of approximately $1,000
and $2,000, respectively,  to the General Partner. At March 31, 2002, the amount
of the outstanding loans and accrued interest was approximately $102,000.

Pursuant  to the  Partnership  Agreement,  the  General  Partner is  entitled to
receive a distribution  equal to 4% of the aggregate  disposition  price of sold
properties.  The  Partnership  paid a distribution  of $154,000,  to the General
Partner related to the sale of Vista Hills Apartments in 1999. This distribution
is  subordinate  to  the  limited  partners  receiving  their  original  capital
contributions  plus a  cumulative  preferred  return  of 6% per  annum  of their
adjusted capital  investment,  as defined in the Partnership  Agreement.  If the
limited   partners  have  not  received  these  returns  when  the   Partnership
terminates, the General Partner will return this amount to the Partnership.

The Partnership  Agreement provides for a fee equal to 5% of "net cash flow from
operations",  as defined in the Partnership Agreement, to be paid to the General
Partner for executive and administration services. The Partnership accrued a fee
of  approximately  $7,000  which  is  included  in due to  General  Partner  and
affiliates and general and administrative expenses. At March 31, 2003, the total
fee accrued  was  approximately  $9,000,  of which  $6,000  relates to the three
months ended March 31, 2003.  No such  management  fee was accrued for the three
months ended March 31, 2002.

The  Partnership  insures its properties up to certain  limits through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the AIMCO limits through
insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the General
Partner. During 2003 and 2002, the Partnership's cost for insurance coverage and
fees  associated  with policy  claims  administration  provided by AIMCO and its
affiliates will be approximately $33,000 and $40,000, respectively.

Note C - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their  affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purports to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial
dissolution of the  Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General  Partner filed a
motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The General Partner filed demurrers to
the amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On July 10,  2001,  the Court  issued  an order  sustaining
defendants'  demurrer on certain grounds.  On July 20, 2001,  Plaintiffs filed a
motion for  reconsideration  of the Court's July 10, 2001 order granting in part
and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001, Plaintiffs filed
a fourth amended class and derivative action  complaint.  On September 12, 2001,
the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On October 5, 2001, the
General Partner and affiliated defendants filed a demurrer to the fourth amended
complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001. On February 2, 2002, the Court
served its order granting in part the demurrer.  The Court has dismissed without
leave  to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'  claims.  On  February  11,  2002,
plaintiffs  filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class  comprised of all
non-affiliated  persons  who own or have owned  units in the  partnerships.  The
General Partner and affiliated  defendants oppose the motion. On April 29, 2002,
the Court held a hearing on plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took
the matter under submission after further briefing, as ordered by the court, was
submitted by the parties.  On July 10, 2002, the Court entered an order vacating
the trial date of  January  13,  2003 (as well as the  pre-trial  and  discovery
cut-off dates) and stayed the case in its entirety  through  November 7, 2002 so
that the parties could have an opportunity to discuss settlement. On October 30,
2002, the court entered an order  extending the stay in effect  through  January
10, 2003.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action  described below. On April
4, 2003, the Court preliminarily approved the settlement and scheduled a hearing
on final approval for June 2, 2003.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the General Partner has also agreed to make a tender
offer to purchase all of the partnership  interests in the  Partnerships  within
one year of final approval,  if it is granted,  and to provide partners with the
independent  appraisals at the time of these  tenders.  The proposed  settlement
also  provides  for the  limitation  of the  allowable  costs  which the General
Partner or its affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships in connection with this
litigation  and  imposes  limits  on the  class  counsel  fees and costs in this
litigation.  On April 11,  2003,  notice was  distributed  to  limited  partners
providing the details of the proposed settlement.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the General Partner and affiliated defendants
moved to strike the first  amended  complaint in its entirety for  violating the
Court's  July 10, 2001 order  granting  in part and denying in part  defendants'
demurrer in the Nuanes action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of
the  complaint  based on the statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the
action demurred to the fourth amended complaint,  and,  alternatively,  moved to
strike the  complaint.  On December  11, 2001,  the court heard  argument on the
motions and took the matters under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court
served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the Heller
complaint  as a violation  of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On
March 27, 2002, the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking the
complaint.  Before completing briefing on the appeal, the parties stayed further
proceedings  in the  appeal  pending  the  Court's  review  of the  terms of the
proposed settlement above described.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any costs to the  Partnership,
whether legal or settlement costs,  associated with these cases will be material
to the Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.


<PAGE>




ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  The discussions of the  Registrant's
business  and  results  of  operations,   including  forward-looking  statements
pertaining to such matters,  do not take into account the effects of any changes
to the  Registrant's  business  and results of  operations.  Actual  results may
differ  materially  from those described in the  forward-looking  statements and
will  be  affected  by  a  variety  of  risks  and  factors  including,  without
limitation:  national and local economic  conditions;  the terms of governmental
regulations that affect the Registrant and interpretations of those regulations;
the competitive  environment in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks,
including the risk that cash flows from  operations may be  insufficient to meet
required  payments of  principal  and  interest;  real estate  risks,  including
variations  of real  estate  values and the  general  economic  climate in local
markets and competition for tenants in such markets; and possible  environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment properties consist of two apartment complexes. The
following table sets forth the average occupancy of the Partnership's properties
for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002:

                                                   Average Occupancy
      Property                                      2003       2002

      Greentree Apartments                          94%        95%
        Mobile, Alabama
      Carriage Hills Apartments                     97%        93%
        East Lansing, Michigan

The General  Partner  attributes  the increase in  occupancy  at Carriage  Hills
Apartments to improved leasing  management  personnel and property  improvements
completed to enhance the property.

Results of Operations

The  Partnership's  net loss for the  three  months  ended  March  31,  2003 was
approximately $46,000, as compared to net income of approximately $5,000 for the
three  months  ended  March 31,  2002.  The  decrease in net income is due to an
increase in total  expenses  and a decrease in total  revenues.  Total  expenses
increased primarily due to an increase in operating expense.  Operating expenses
increased  primarily  due to an increase in  maintenance  expense at both of the
Partnership's  investment  properties  resulting from an increase in contractual
expenses and snow  removal and an increase in payroll  related  costs.  Interest
expense,   depreciation   expense,   property   tax   expense  and  general  and
administrative expenses remained relatively constant for the comparable periods.
Included in general and administrative  expenses at both March 31, 2003 and 2002
are  management  reimbursements  to the  General  Partner as  allowed  under the
Partnership  Agreement.  In addition,  costs  associated  with the quarterly and
annual  communications  with  investors and  regulatory  agencies and the annual
audit required by the Partnership Agreement are also included.

Total  revenues  decreased due to a decrease in rental  income.  The decrease in
rental  income  is  primarily  due  to a  decrease  in  occupancy  at  Greentree
Apartments,  and an  increase  in  concessions  and  bad  debt  expense  at both
properties,  partially  offset by an increase  in  occupancy  at Carriage  Hills
Apartments and an increase in the average  rental rate at Greentree  Apartments.
Other  income  remained  relatively  constant  for  the  comparable  periods  as
increases in laundry income were offset by decreases in lease  cancellation fees
and late charges.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the General  Partner
monitors the rental market  environment of each of its investment  properties to
assess the feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy
levels and protecting  the  Partnership  from increases in expenses.  As part of
this plan,  the General  Partner  attempts to protect the  Partnership  from the
burden of  inflation-related  increases  in  expenses  by  increasing  rents and
maintaining a high overall  occupancy  level.  However,  due to changing  market
conditions,  which  can  result  in the use of  rental  concessions  and  rental
reductions to offset softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the
General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  March  31,  2003,  the  Partnership   had  cash  and  cash   equivalents  of
approximately  $191,000,  compared to approximately  $186,000 at March 31, 2002.
The increase in cash and cash equivalents of approximately $80,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2003, from the Partnership's calendar year end, is due to
approximately   $150,000  of  cash   provided  by   operating   activities   and
approximately  $15,000  of cash  provided  by  investing  activities,  which was
partially offset by approximately  $85,000 of cash used in financing activities.
Cash  provided by investing  activities  consisted  of net receipts  from escrow
accounts  maintained  by the  mortgage  lender,  partially  offset  by  property
improvements and replacements.  Cash used in financing  activities  consisted of
payments on advances from the General  Partner and payments of principal made on
the mortgages encumbering the Registrant's  properties.  The Partnership invests
its working capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures  required at the investment  properties to adequately  maintain the
physical  assets and other  operating needs of the Registrant and to comply with
Federal, state and local legal and regulatory requirements.  The General Partner
monitors  developments  in the area of legal and  regulatory  compliance  and is
studying  new  federal  laws,  including  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002.  The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests  additional  compliance measures
with regard to governance,  disclosure, audit and other areas. In light of these
changes,  the Partnership  expects that it will incur higher expenses related to
compliance,  including  increased  legal and audit  fees.  Capital  improvements
planned for the Partnership's properties are detailed below.

Greentree  Apartments:  During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2003,  the
Partnership completed approximately $17,000 of capital improvements at Greentree
Apartments,  consisting  primarily of roof  replacement  and floor  covering and
appliance  replacements.  These  improvements  were funded from  operations  and
replacement reserves. The Partnership evaluates the capital improvement needs of
the property  during the year and  currently  expects to complete an  additional
$43,000 in capital  improvements  during the remainder of 2003.  The  additional
capital  improvements  will consist  primarily of roof  replacement,  structural
improvements,  HVAC  upgrades,  and floor  covering and appliance  replacements.
Additional  capital  improvements  may be  considered  and  will  depend  on the
physical  condition  of the  property  as  well  as the  anticipated  cash  flow
generated by the property and replacement reserves.

Carriage  Hills  Apartments:  During the three months ended March 31, 2003,  the
Partnership  completed  approximately $3,000 of capital improvements at Carriage
Hills  Apartments,   consisting   primarily  of  floor  covering  and  appliance
replacements.  These  improvements  were funded from  operations and replacement
reserves.  The  Partnership  evaluates  the  capital  improvement  needs  of the
property during the year and currently expects to complete an additional $46,000
in capital  improvements  during the remainder of 2003. The  additional  capital
improvements will consist primarily of parking area upgrades,  exterior building
improvements,  and floor covering  replacement.  Additional capital improvements
may be considered  and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as
well as the  anticipated  cash flow  generated by the  property and  replacement
reserves.

The additional  capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available
from  operations  and  Partnership  reserves.  To the extent that such  budgeted
capital improvements are completed, the Registrant's distributable cash flow, if
any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The  Registrant's  assets are thought to be sufficient  for any near-term  needs
(exclusive of capital improvements) of the Registrant. The mortgage indebtedness
of  approximately  $8,364,000,  net of  discount,  matures in  October  2003 and
December 2004 with balloon payments of approximately  $3,248,000 and $4,958,000,
respectively,  due at  maturity.  The General  Partner will attempt to refinance
such  indebtedness  and/or sell the properties  prior to such maturity dates. If
the  properties  cannot  be  refinanced  or sold for a  sufficient  amount,  the
Registrant will risk losing such properties through foreclosure.

There were no  distributions to the partners during the three months ended March
31, 2003 and 2002.  Future cash  distributions  will depend on the levels of net
cash generated from operations, the availability of cash reserves and the timing
of debt  maturities,  refinancings,  and/or property  sales.  The Partnership is
currently  planning on refinancing  the debt  encumbering  Greentree  Apartments
prior to its  October  2003  maturity.  The  Partnership's  cash  available  for
distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. There can be no assurance, however,
that the  Partnership  will generate  sufficient  funds from  operations,  after
required capital  expenditures,  to permit any  distributions to its partners in
2003 or subsequent  periods.  Distributions may be restricted by the requirement
to deposit  net  operating  income (as  defined in the  mortgage  note) into the
Reserve  Account until the Reserve  Account is funded in an amount equal to $200
to $400 per apartment  unit for Greentree  Apartments  for a total of $35,600 to
$71,200.  As of March 31, 2003, the  Partnership  had deposits of  approximately
$41,000 in the reserve account.

Other

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  owned 11,009 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 59.11% of the outstanding Units at
March 31, 2003. A number of these Units were acquired  pursuant to tender offers
made by AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is possible  that AIMCO or its  affiliates
will acquire additional units of limited partnership interest in the Partnership
in  exchange  for  cash or a  combination  of cash and  units  in the  operating
partnership of AIMCO either through  private  purchases or tender offers.  Under
the  Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders  holding a  majority  of the units are
entitled  to take  action  with  respect to a variety of  matters,  which  would
include voting on certain amendments to the Partnership  Agreement and voting to
remove  the  General  Partner.  As a result  of its  ownership  of 59.11% of the
outstanding  units,  AIMCO is in a position to control all such voting decisions
with  respect to the  Registrant.  Although the General  Partner owes  fiduciary
duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the General Partner also owes
fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole  stockholder.  As a result,  the duties of
the General  Partner,  as general  partner,  to the  Partnership and its limited
partners may come into conflict with the duties of the General Partner to AIMCO,
as its sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States which require the Partnership
to  make  estimates  and  assumptions.  The  Partnership  believes  that  of its
significant  accounting  policies,  the following may involve a higher degree of
judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Investment  properties  are  recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying  amount of a property may be  impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's  investment  properties.  These  factors  include  changes  in the
national,  regional and local economic  climate;  local  conditions,  such as an
oversupply  of  multifamily   properties;   competition   from  other  available
multifamily  property  owners and changes in market  rental  rates.  Any adverse
changes in these factors could cause an impairment in the Partnership's assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
Rental income  attributable to leases is recognized  monthly as it is earned and
the Partnership  fully reserves all balances  outstanding  over thirty days. The
Partnership will offer rental concessions during  particularly slow months or in
response  to  heavy  competition  from  other  similar  complexes  in the  area.
Concessions are charged to income as incurred.

ITEM 3.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The principal  executive officer and principal  financial officer of the General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and  principal  financial  officer,  respectively,  have,  within 90 days of the
filing  date  of this  quarterly  report,  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the
Partnership's  disclosure  controls and  procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c)) and have determined that such disclosure controls
and  procedures  are  adequate.  There have been no  significant  changes in the
Partnership's  internal  controls or in other  factors that could  significantly
affect the  Partnership's  internal  controls since the date of evaluation.  The
Partnership does not believe any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses
exist in the Partnership's internal controls. Accordingly, no corrective actions
have been taken.


<PAGE>



                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their  affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purports to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial
dissolution of the  Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General  Partner filed a
motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The General Partner filed demurrers to
the amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On July 10,  2001,  the Court  issued  an order  sustaining
defendants'  demurrer on certain grounds.  On July 20, 2001,  Plaintiffs filed a
motion for  reconsideration  of the Court's July 10, 2001 order granting in part
and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001, Plaintiffs filed
a fourth amended class and derivative action  complaint.  On September 12, 2001,
the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On October 5, 2001, the
General Partner and affiliated defendants filed a demurrer to the fourth amended
complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001. On February 2, 2002, the Court
served its order granting in part the demurrer.  The Court has dismissed without
leave  to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'  claims.  On  February  11,  2002,
plaintiffs  filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class  comprised of all
non-affiliated  persons  who own or have owned  units in the  partnerships.  The
General Partner and affiliated  defendants oppose the motion. On April 29, 2002,
the Court held a hearing on plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took
the matter under submission after further briefing, as ordered by the court, was
submitted by the parties.  On July 10, 2002, the Court entered an order vacating
the trial date of  January  13,  2003 (as well as the  pre-trial  and  discovery
cut-off dates) and stayed the case in its entirety  through  November 7, 2002 so
that the parties could have an opportunity to discuss settlement. On October 30,
2002, the court entered an order  extending the stay in effect  through  January
10, 2003.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action  described below. On April
4, 2003, the Court preliminarily approved the settlement and scheduled a hearing
on final approval for June 2, 2003.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the General Partner has also agreed to make a tender
offer to purchase all of the partnership  interests in the  Partnerships  within
one year of final approval,  if it is granted,  and to provide partners with the
independent  appraisals at the time of these  tenders.  The proposed  settlement
also  provides  for the  limitation  of the  allowable  costs  which the General
Partner or its affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships in connection with this
litigation  and  imposes  limits  on the  class  counsel  fees and costs in this
litigation.  On April 11,  2003,  notice was  distributed  to  limited  partners
providing the details of the proposed settlement.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the General Partner and affiliated defendants
moved to strike the first  amended  complaint in its entirety for  violating the
Court's  July 10, 2001 order  granting  in part and denying in part  defendants'
demurrer in the Nuanes action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of
the  complaint  based on the statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the
action demurred to the fourth amended complaint,  and,  alternatively,  moved to
strike the  complaint.  On December  11, 2001,  the court heard  argument on the
motions and took the matters under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court
served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the Heller
complaint  as a violation  of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On
March 27, 2002, the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking the
complaint.  Before completing briefing on the appeal, the parties stayed further
proceedings  in the  appeal  pending  the  Court's  review  of the  terms of the
proposed settlement above described.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any costs to the  Partnership,
whether legal or settlement costs,  associated with these cases will be material
to the Partnership's overall operations.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a)    Exhibits:

                  Exhibit  3.1,  Amended  Certificate  and  Agreement of Limited
                  Partnership  dated  June 24,  1980,  filed in Form 10-K  dated
                  October 31, 1982, and is incorporated herein by reference.

                  Exhibit 99, Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                  as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
                  of 2002.

            b)    Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended March 31, 2003.




<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                          ANGELES PARTNERS X


                                    By:   Angeles Realty Corporation
                                          Its General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Chief Accounting Officer


                                    Date:  May 19, 2003


<PAGE>




                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Patrick J. Foye, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Angeles Partners X;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


      a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
      material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,   including   its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;


      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing  date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c)  Presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
      effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


      a) All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process,  summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


      b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
      controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: May 19, 2003

                                    /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Patrick J. Foye
                                    Executive Vice President of Angeles Realty
                                    Corporation, equivalent of the chief
                                    executive officer of the Partnership


<PAGE>



                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Paul J. McAuliffe, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Angeles Partners X;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


      a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
      material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,   including   its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;


      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing  date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c)  Presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
      effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


      a) All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process,  summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


      b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
      controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: May 19, 2003

                                    /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                                    Officer  of  Angeles   Realty   Corporation,
                                    equivalent of the chief financial officer of
                                    the Partnership


<PAGE>



Exhibit 99


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Angeles  Partners X
(the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),
Patrick  J.  Foye,  as the  equivalent  of the chief  executive  officer  of the
Partnership,  and Paul J.  McAuliffe,  as the equivalent of the chief  financial
officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Name:  Patrick J. Foye
                                    Date:  May 19, 2003


                                           /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Name:  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Date:  May 19, 2003

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the  Partnership for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.