alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2247 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, NA5 TIONAL AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS SERVICE 

6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for US Department of Agriculture, National AgriculVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:34 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2247.IH H2247

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2247 IH

1 tural Statistics Service for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $174,517,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
OSCEOLA COUNTY SCHOOL

BOARD and JOHNS EASTERN

COMPANY, INC.

,

Appellant s

,

v.

SHEILA STONE

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 183 7

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 10, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

Neal P. Pitts , Judge

.

Date of Accident: March 8 , 201 3

.

Pamela J. Cox and Jodi K. Mustoe of Cox & Rouse, P.A., Maitland. , for Appellant s

.

Nicholas A. Shannin of Shannin Law Firm , Orlando , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000

Commission File Number: 333-57027

ABN AMRO Mortgage Corporation issuer in respect of
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1999-5
(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware      			363886007
(State or Other Juris-		(I.R.S. Employer
diction of Incorporation)     Identification No.)

181 West Madison Street, Chicago, IL 60602
(Address of Principal Executive Office)

248-643-2530
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:     None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:     None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed  by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  X   No _

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.

Not applicable.

Aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the Registrant as of December 31, 2000.

Not applicable.

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31,
2000.

Not applicable.
XM SATELLITE RADIO HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



Exhibit 32.2



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not deemed to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K accompanying
this statement.



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of XM Satellite Radio Inc., each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Form 10-K of XM Satellite Radio Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2007 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of XM Satellite Radio Inc.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                         
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 28, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ NATHANIEL A. DAVIS                                                  
|                        |  |  |  | Nathaniel A. Davis President and Chief
Executive Officer                
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 28, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ JOSEPH J. EUTENEUER                                                 
|                        |  |  |  | Joseph J. Euteneuer Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to XM Satellite Radio Inc. and will be retained by XM Satellite Radio Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2077 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2077

  To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Executive 
  Office of the President, Official Residence of the Vice President, 
                Operating Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Executive 
  Office of the President, Official Residence of the Vice President, 
                Operating Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF 
              THE PRESIDENT, OFFICIAL RESIDENCE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT, 
              OPERATING EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Executive Office of the 
President, Official Residence of the Vice President, Operating Expenses 
for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $302,000.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In condition with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polydex
Pharmaceuticals Limited (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended October 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, George G. Usher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

By /s/ George G.
UsherGeorge G. Usher, Chief Executive Officer December 14, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                             Civitas BankGroup, Inc.
                              List of Subsidiaries

Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries:

      Cumberland Bank - Franklin, Tennessee
      Civitas Management Company - Franklin, Tennessee

Each of these wholly-owned subsidiaries is incorporated under the laws of the
state of Tennessee.

      The company also owns 50% of The Murray Banc Holding Company LLC, which
      owns 100% of The Murray Bank, a bank organized under the laws of the state
      of Kentucky and 50% of Insurors Bank of Tennessee, a bank organized under
      the laws of the state of Tennessee.

      Non-Bank Subsidiaries

      The company owns 100% of the common securities of the Civitas Statutory
      Trust I, a Delaware Business Trust and Cumberland Capital Statutory Trust
      II, a Connecticut Business Trust.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

lionorable J. B. Bank8 county Judge Pavker County Weatherford, Teum
mar sir1

Your requert ta an 8 ln part; dqartment reada

r OSthe State OSTeru have County Attorney or Criminal Ill out 81’

. Borden’s unexColatulonero Oourt le nowin niting tU8 letter at the request of the Cowt La the abrenoe of a Oeunty **At** torney through vhomve oan meet tlrFa quution. I right state hers that Parker County bar alvap dealgnated its Attorney a8 the County Attorney, but he hea alvsga handled the duties of ’ a Matriot Attorney, ae weare not In any Distriot Attomey’r Dl8triot. nHcixwrrbleJ. B. Banka, pa@ 2

‘lieheld in our Cplnlm Pp. O-3636, a copy of vhloh la enoloaed herevlth, thet a ohcnge ln th43title oi county attorney to that of cr*imlml dlatriot attorney under Senate Bill 312, Acts of the 47th Legislature, **does not**  **ahAng the**  **~Overa,** duties **&rid** fumtlona of the **offloer.**

Senate Bill 3l2, 47th Legislature of texaa, provides that the oounty attorney of any oounty Fn thla State not ,embraoed **ln** or **oom#tltutSng** either a or-1 dlatriot attorney's **dlatrlot or**  a district**attorne** L of representing the State in a (8dlatrlot **and u&e&eln**  the duty Oriml.n01uattera arisingln such oouuty devolves upon the oountr attorney of suchoounty, EQht pet1tiOn the cOlwi*alone&a* court to deal(pute the oifloe **of oounty**  **attorney 8L**  **the** offloe of orlmlnel **dlatrlet** 

### l **tto&ney** ofl ueh oounty. It apeoUloO11y **provides** that”0 ayltg g,e PO 0r th0 0fri00 **8haii** not ogard20 **80** u t0 affeot either the rights, dutiesI Or emoluvmnta’o~ ;wh ofiioe or the lncllmbeIlt thereor.
. . .*

Seotlon 2 of the **Aot** reada:

‘INTENTOF**ACT.** It ie not the intention of this **Act** to oreate any efiiicpe gr.zai8trlcti **Attorney**
or **any ottup**  **Conatltutlonel offloej.**  **but It**  is **the lntent10n**  **of thl.8**  **Act** 

### mere4 to LuthoPUe 8 ohange lnthenameofanda r uatbm of th0 0iri00 0f **County Attorney**  **and** e inouabent thereof in tiertaln @ountiea, without otheruLae ~ha@.ng or atfooting the rights, dutlea 0# emolummta either of l uoh OfilOe Or the inoumbent ~thO&ctOf

.” Artlole 2355, **Vernon*a** Anuotated Civil **Statutes,** reedas

“Tha Court shallhave paver to fill vaoanoiea In the ofiloe of8 County Judge, County Clerk, Shwlff, Couuty **Attorpep,** County **Treasurer,** County Su&- veyor, CouutJr

Bid0 Iuapeotor, Aa8eaaw of faxes, Colleotor of Taxes, Juatloea oi the Peace,Constables, and County Superlnteudent of Pub110Inl trriction. su0h vaoaaoiea ahall b0 illlad by a majority vote of the wmbera of aaid Court p&esent and voting, and the person uhoaen ah011 hold offloe until th0 next; general eleotion.”I

B j Aaalatant Bonor8bls d. ~B.Banke, pege 3

It la Our oplnlim that the vmuioy IJIthe oiflea OS ariestnal dlat&lct attorney should be tilled by l otlan of the commlaalonerat aourt, acting pursuant to Artlale 2355, sup&a. Very truly yours ATTOAIIEY WIBRALOPTEL83

En0108 ure
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2150 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, 

United States Postal Service, Payment to the Postal Service Fund for 

fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, United States Postal Service, Payment 

to the Postal Service Fund for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES, UNITED STATES 

5 POSTAL SERVICE, PAYMENT TO THE POSTAL 

6 SERVICE FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Independent Agencies, United States Postal ServVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:17 Apr 18, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2150.IH H2150

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2150 IH

1 ice, Payment to the Postal Service Fund for fiscal year 

2 2024 may not exceed $52,570,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Bens, Appellant.

[972 NYS2d 576]—

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Camacho, J), dated August 16, 2011, which denied, without a hearing, his motion to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal sale of a con*665trolled substance in the third degree, which sentence was previously imposed, upon a jury verdict, on March 7, 2001.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new determination of the defendant’s motion, in accordance herewith.

CPL 440.46 (3), provides, in pertinent part, that “[t]he provisions of section twenty-three of chapter seven hundred thirty-eight of the laws of two thousand four shall govern the proceedings on and determination of a motion brought pursuant to this section.” Section 23 of chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004 states, in pertinent part: “The court shall offer an opportunity for a hearing and bring the applicant before it. The court may also conduct a hearing, if necessary, to determine . . . any controverted issue of fact relevant to the issue of sentencing.” The defendant’s presence is not required where the court determines as a matter of law that a defendant is not entitled to relief pursuant to CPL 440.46 *(see People v Allen,*105 AD3d 969 [2013]). However, here, the People conceded that the defendant met the statutory requirements for relief pursuant to CPL 440.46, and the question before the Supreme Court was whether substantial justice dictated that the motion should be denied. Thus, the defendant was entitled to appear before the court and to be given an opportunity to be heard *(see id.).*

Here, although the defendant was brought before the Supreme Court, a decision denying the defendant’s motion had already been issued on the parties’ written submissions and the defendant was denied an opportunity to address the court. Indeed, the justice presiding on the appearance date was not the same justice who had received the written submissions and authored the decision denying the defendant’s motion. Thus, the defendant was effectively denied an opportunity to be heard *(see People v Allen,*105 AD3d 969 [2013]; *People v Irvin,*96 AD3d 1453 [2012]; *People v Murray,*89 AD3d 567, 569 [2011]; *cf. People v Lopez,*103 AD3d 460 [2013], *lv denied*21 NY3d 945 [2013]; *People v Morales,*46 AD3d 1395 [2007]; *People v Soler,*45 AD3d 499 [2007]; *People v Robinson,*45 AD3d 442, 442-443 [2007]; *People v Burgos,*44 AD3d 387 [2007]). Accordingly, the order appealed from must be reversed, and the matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new determination of the defendant’s motion, to be made after affording him an opportunity to appear before the court, and, if necessary, conducting a hearing *(see People v Allen,*105 AD3d 969 [2013]). Mastro, J.P, Hall, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8269

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. CARLOS DEMETRICE HORNE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cr-00108-RLW-1; 3:07-cv-00579-RLW)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 26, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Demetrice Horne, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia N. Hawkins, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Carlos Demetrice Horne seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2006) motion and subsequent motion to reconsider pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Horne has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Note: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-1538 

AIRGO IP, LLC 

and AIRGO SYSTEMS, LLC, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

ARVINMERITOR, INC., 

PRESSURE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

and EQUALAIRE SYSTEMS, INC., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

Donald R. Dunner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., of 

Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Don O. 

Burley, and Denise W. DeFranco, of Cambridge, Massachuetts. Of counsel on the brief 

was Daniel P. Dooley, Fellers, Snider, Blankenship, Bailey & Tippens, P.C., of 

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. 

Seth P. Waxman, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Washington, 

DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Edward C. DuMont, 

Eric R. Columbus, and Dutch D. Chung, of Washington, DC, and Noah A. Levine, of 

New York, New York. 

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma 

Judge David L. Russell 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2007-1538 

AIRGO IP, LLC 

and AIRGO SYSTEMS, LLC, 

 Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

ARVINMERITOR, INC., 

PRESSURE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

and EQUALAIRE SYSTEMS, INC., 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Western District of 

Oklahoma 

in CASE NO(S). 05-CV-1405 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, MAYER and SCHALL) Circuit Judges. 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED May 15, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 21-50962 Summary Calendar

United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus
Denzell Rodgers,
Defendant—Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:14-CR-290-1

Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to repres ent Denzell Rodgers has moved for leave to withdraw and has file d a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodgers has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 18, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-50962 Document: 00516397292 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/18/2022No. 21-50962

2 relevant portions of the record reflecte d therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED

. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 21-50962 Document: 00516397292 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/18/2022
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2298 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2298

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
   State, Administration of Foreign Affairs, Diplomatic Programs for 
                           fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
   State, Administration of Foreign Affairs, Diplomatic Programs for 
                           fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 
              ADMINISTRATION OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, DIPLOMATIC PROGRAMS 
              FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of State, 
Administration of Foreign Affairs, Diplomatic Programs for fiscal year 
2024 may not exceed $5,947,952,000.
                                 <all>
```