alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

BULOVA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I John D Stanton, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John D. StantonJohn D. StantonPrincipal Executive Officer
May 21, 2010
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2330 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for the Western Hemisphere Drug Policy Commission, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 

2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for the 

Western Hemisphere Drug Policy Commission, Salaries 

and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE DRUG POLICY 

5 COMMISSION, SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR 

6 FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for the Western Hemisphere Drug Policy CommisVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:10 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2330.IH H2330

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2330 IH

1 sion, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may not 

2 exceed $1,500,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 28, 2011 

p1219 

Order 

 

December 28, 2011 

143650 

AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 

v SC: 143650 

 COA: 297534 

Oakland CC: 09-101116-CK 

BRIAN LEPP, 

 Defendant/Cross-Defendant, 

and 

ESTATE OF KATHLEEN O’NEILL, 

 Intervening Defendant/Counter- 

 Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff- 

 Appellant, 

v 

VALENTI TROBEC CHANDLER INC, AND 

JAIME FAZIO, 

 Third-Party Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 19, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2081 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2081

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The Judiciary, 
US Court of International Trade, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 
                                 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The Judiciary, 
US Court of International Trade, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 
                                 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE JUDICIARY, US 
              COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE, SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR 
              FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for The Judiciary, US Court 
of International Trade, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may 
not exceed $18,882,000.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Bobby Jordan, Petitioner, v Michael Ambrosio, as Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

[870 NYS2d 801]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the respondent Michael Ambrosio, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, from resentencing the petitioner in a matter entitled *People v Jordan*pending in that court under indictment No. 2000-4466. Application by the petitioner to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” *(Matter of Holtzman v Goldman,*71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; *see Matter of Rush v Mordue,*68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Mastro, J.E, Miller, Balkin and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1771 

To amend section 248 of title 18, United States Code, to provide adequate 

penalties and remedies for attacks on facilities providing counseling about 

abortion alternatives and attacks on places of religious worship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2023 

Ms. TENNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 248 of title 18, United States Code, to 

provide adequate penalties and remedies for attacks on 

facilities providing counseling about abortion alternatives 

and attacks on places of religious worship. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pregnancy Resource 

5 Center Defense Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1771 IH

1 SEC. 2. ATTACKS ON FACILITIES PROVIDING COUNSELING 

2 ABOUT ABORTION ALTERNATIVES AND 

3 PLACES OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP. 

4 (a) CRIMINAL PENALTIES.—Section 248(b)(1) of 

5 title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘, 

6 except that for a first offense, if the conduct involved a 

7 facility described in subsection (a)(3) that exclusively pro8 vides abortion-alternative services or involved a place of 

9 religious worship and did not involve exclusively a non10 violent physical obstruction, the length of imprisonment 

11 shall be not more than 3 years’’ after ‘‘or both’’. 

12 (b) CIVIL REMEDIES.—Section 248(c) of title 18, 

13 United States Code, is amended— 

14 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), in the second sentence, 

15 by inserting ‘‘, or $20,000 per violation for conduct 

16 involving a facility described in subsection (a)(3) 

17 that exclusively provides abortion-alternative services 

18 or involving a place of religious worship’’ after ‘‘per 

19 violation’’; and 

20 (2) in paragraph (2)(B)(i), by inserting ‘‘, 

21 $25,000 for a first violation, if the violation involved 

22 a facility described in subsection (a)(3) that exclu23 sively provides abortion-alternative services or in24 volved a place of religious worship and did not in25 volve exclusively a nonviolent physical obstruction,’’ 

26 after ‘‘physical obstruction’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1771 IH

1 SEC. 3. DESTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, AND 

2 PROPERTY. 

3 Section 844(i) of title 18, United States Code, is 

4 amended by inserting ‘‘or if the building is a facility de5 scribed in section 248(a)(3) that exclusively provides abor6 tion-alternative services or is a place of religious worship,’’ 

7 before ‘‘shall be imprisoned for not less than 7 years’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2214 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, 

John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, Capital Repair and 

Restoration for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, Capital Repair and Restoration for fiscal 

year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2214 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 RELATED AGENCIES, JOHN F. KENNEDY CEN3 TER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS, CAPITAL 

4 REPAIR AND RESTORATION FOR FISCAL 

5 YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Related Agencies, John F. Kennedy Center for 

9 the Performing Arts, Capital Repair and Restoration for 

10 fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $13,440,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32(e)

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  FOR PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30,
  2003

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Electric Utilities
  Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with
  the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"),
  I, the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  hereby certify that:

| | · | The Covered Report fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                             
| | · | The information contained in the Covered
        Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.





|Date: August 12, 2003 | /s/ Michael E. BrayMichael E. Bray
        President 
        PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2277 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Rural Development Programs, Rural Community Facilities Program Account for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Rural Development Programs, Rural Community Facilities Program Account for 

fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2277 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL 

3 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS, RURAL COMMU4 NITY FACILITIES PROGRAM ACCOUNT FOR 

5 FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for US Department of Agriculture, Rural Develop9 ment Programs, Rural Community Facilities Program Ac10 count for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $2,800,000,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2111 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, 

Federal Election Commission for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, Federal Election Commission for fiscal 

year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES, FEDERAL ELEC5 TION COMMISSION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:16 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2111.IH H2111

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2111 IH

1 able for Independent Agencies, Federal Election Commis2 sion for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $71,250,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 99.1

                                  iBASIS, INC.
                                20 Second Avenue
                              Burlington, MA 01803


                                             March 26, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20549

Dear Sir or Madam:

         We hereby submit this letter in accordance with recent orders and rules
issued by your office regarding the financial statements audited by Arthur
Andersen LLP ("Andersen"). Andersen serves as iBasis, Inc.'s ("iBasis")
independent public accountant.

         Andersen has represented to iBasis, Inc. that its 2001 annual audit was
subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and
auditing practice, it provided reasonable assurance that the engagement was
conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate
continuity of Andersen personnel working on audits, and availability of national
office consultation. According to Andersen, availability of personnel at foreign
affiliates of Andersen was not relevant to this audit.

                                            Sincerely,

                                            /s/ Richard Tennant
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Richard Tennant
                                            Vice President, Finance and
                                            Administration and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
11807.

#### CORKER *v.*SIMMONS.

A real-estate agent’s commission on a sale of land made by the owner to another was not recoverable by the agent, under the allegations of the petition.

Decided March 16, 1921.

Complaint; from Laurens superior court — Judge Kent. July 30, 1920.

Simmons sued for a sum alleged to be due him as a commission on the sale of certain real estate owned by the defendant, Corker, in Dublin, Ga., alleging that Corker employed him as agent to negotiate the sale of this real estate and to assist in disposing of it at stated prices, and agreed to pay him stipulated commissions for his services; that “in pursuance of said contract he immediately went to work, in good faith and for the promised consideration, to sell said property and approached some prospects, chief among whom were T. A. Curry and E. J. Schiff, and succeeded .in interesting said prospects in the purchase of said property, thus creating, by his efforts under the contract, a demand for said property, making it possible to sell the. same on account of petitioner’s negotiations and experience in the sale of real estate in the city of Dublin;” that “as a direct result and consequence of his personal negotiations ” Corker “ did consummate a trade for the sale of said property to Dr. *W:*E. Brigham, ” and that the sale of the property by Corker to Brigham was “ a result of the efforts of agitation and conduct of your petitioner in seeking to sell said property, and that as a result . . Corker got the immediate benefit of petitioner’s labors in the sale of said property to Brigham, as it required no effort on the part of the said Corker to sell said property to the said Brigham, but was merely the consummation of a contract and deal resulting directly and immediately from labors performed by your petitioner pursuant to the contract with the defendant to sell said property, the said labors performed being negotiations with the said Curry and the said Schiff and others, and thus creating a demand for said property, the demand thus created having interested the said Brigham, the said Brigham having become interested as a direct result of the demand thus created. ”

*516A general demurrer to the petition was overruled, and the defendant excepted.

*Larsen '<$> GrocheU,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. S. Adams, B. Bari Camp,*contra.

Hill, J.

By authority of the decision of this court in *Moore*v. *May,*10 *Ga. App.*198 (73 S. E. 29), and section 3587 of the Civil Code of 1910, the judgment overruling the demurrer to the petition is reversed.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Richard Gloss, Appellant, v Timothy J. Murray, as Superintendent of Gowanda Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[830 NYS2d 624]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Ronald H. Tills, A.J.), entered September 9, 2005. The judgment denied the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner contends that he is entitled to immediate release because his original sentence of a term of incarceration of 25 years to life was subsequently modified to a term of incarceration of I2V2 to 25 years, and he has been incarcerated in excess of 25 years. Petitioner failed to produce any evidence that his sentence had been modified, however, and thus failed to establish that he is not properly “detained by virtue of the judgment of the court” *(People ex rel. Trainor v Baker,*89 NY 460, 465 [1882]). The further contention of petitioner that his original sentence was improper is not properly raised in this proceeding because “[h]abeas corpus relief is not a proper remedy where the issues raised in the petition were, or could have been, raised on direct appeal or by a CPL article 440 motion” *(People ex rel. Abdullah v Walker,*199 AD2d 1074, 1074 [1993], *lv denied*83 NY2d 752 [1994]; see *People ex rel. Spencer v Burge,*307 AD2d 772, 773 [2003]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Gorski, Centra and Green, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Stacy Tyree NICHOLS, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-4812.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 17, 2006.

Decided: June 13, 2006.

*241Romallus O. Murphy, Law Office of Romallus O. Murphy, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Michael Augustus DeFranco, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Stacy Tyree Nichols pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute 34.6 grams of cocaine base “crack” (Count 1) and to being a felon in possession of a weapon (Count 4) and was sentenced to 190 months of imprisonment. On appeal, counsel has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), alleging that there are no meritorious claims on appeal but raising one issue: whether Nichols was properly sentenced to 190 months of imprisonment. We affirm.

We find that Nichols was properly sentenced, under 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(e) (West 2000 & Supp.2005), as an armed career criminal based on his prior North Carolina convictions for breaking and entering. Nichols was sentenced within his properly calculated Sentencing Guidelines range of 188 to 235 months. We conclude that his ultimate sentence, which fell at the low end of this range, is reasonable under *Booker. United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 261, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) (stating review standard); *see United States v. Green,*436 F.3d 449, 457 (4th Cir.2006) (“[A] sentence imposed within the properly calculated Guidelines range ... is presumptively reasonable.”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

We have examined the entire record in this case, in accordance with the requirements of *Anders,*and find no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Nichols’ motion for abeyance. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*