alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1923 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1923

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
 Labor, Employment and Training Administration, For National Programs 
                         for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
 Labor, Employment and Training Administration, For National Programs 
                         for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 
              EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION, FOR NATIONAL 
              PROGRAMS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Labor, 
Employment and Training Administration, For National Programs for 
fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $712,868,000.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Benton H Wilcoxon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Composite Technology
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: May 10, 2006

  By: /s/ Benton H Wilcoxon
      ---------------------------
      Benton H Wilcoxon
      Chief Executive Officer and
        Acting Chief Financial Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2199 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Environmental Protection Agency, Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Program Account for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Environmental Protection Agency, Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Program Account for fiscal year 

2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2199 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 

3 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE AND IN4 NOVATION PROGRAM ACCOUNT FOR FISCAL 

5 YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Environmental Protection Agency, Water Infra9 structure Finance and Innovation Program Account for 

10 fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $5,000,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2164 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2164

     To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. 
Department of Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service, State and Tribal 
                 Wildlife Grants for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. 
Department of Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service, State and Tribal 
                 Wildlife Grants for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR U.S. DEPARTMENT OF 
              INTERIOR, US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, STATE AND TRIBAL 
              WILDLIFE GRANTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for U.S. Department of 
Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service, State and Tribal Wildlife 
Grants for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $64,571,000.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 12.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Fred Kindle,certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 20-F of ABB Ltd;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

4.                The company’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a)           Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b)          Evaluated theeffectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in thisreport any change in the company’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The company’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’sauditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)          Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 19, 2006

| /s/ FRED KINDLE          |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Fred Kindle              |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer |   |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                             18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Edentify, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas J. Harkins,
Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Date: March 30, 2006


                                        /s/ Thomas J. Harkins
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Thomas J. Harkins
                                        Chief Operating Officer


                                       36
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.0

                            ACME COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

     ACME TELEVISION HOLDINGS, LLC:

        ACME INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, LLC:

                                                                   ORGANIZED
        SUBSIDIARIES:                                             UNDER LAWS OF

        ACME Television, LLC                                       Delaware
        ACME Subsidiary Holdings II, LLC                           Delaware
        ACME Intermediate Finance, Inc.                            Delaware

               ACME TELEVISION, LLC:

                                                                   ORGANIZED
               SUBSIDIARIES:                                      UNDER LAWS OF

               ACME Subsidiary Holdings III, LLC                   Delaware
               ACME Finance Corporation                            Delaware
               ACME Television of New Mexico, LLC                  Delaware
               ACME Television Licenses of New Mexico, LLC         Delaware
               ACME Television of Oregon, LLC                      Delaware
               ACME Television Licenses of Oregon, LLC             Delaware
               ACME Television of Tennessee, LLC                   Delaware
               ACME Television Licenses of Tennessee, LLC          Delaware
               ACME Television of Utah, LLC                        Delaware
               ACME Television Licenses of Utah, LLC               Delaware
               ACME Television Holdings of Missouri, Inc.          Missouri
               ACME Television of Missouri, Inc.                   Missouri
               ACME Television Licenses of Missouri, LLC           Missouri
               ACME Television of Florida, LLC                     Delaware
               ACME Television Licenses of Florida, LLC            Delaware
               ACME Television of Ohio, LLC                        Delaware
               ACME Television Licenses of Ohio, LLC               Delaware
               ACME Television of Illinois, LLC                    Delaware
               ACME Television Licenses of Illinois, LLC           Delaware
               ACME Television of Wisconsin, LLC                   Delaware
               ACME Television Licenses of Wisconsin, LLC          Delaware
               ACME Television of Michigan, LLC                    Delaware


                                       70
exhibit105.htm


EXHIBIT 10.5


 


 


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECURITY AGREEMENT


 


Reference is made to that certain Security Agreement dated as of July 3, 2013 between SignalShare, LLC as Debtor and NFS Leasing, Inc as Secured Party. (the “Security Agreement”).


 


For good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Debtor and Secured Party herby agree to the following amendment of the Security Agreement:


 


The definition of “Obligations” contained in the Security Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following definition:


 


"Obligations" shall mean:


 


(a)           all indebtedness and liabilities whatsoever of Debtor to Secured Party which in any manner relate to or arise from payments owed to Secured Party under a certain Master Equipment Lease Number 2013-218  dated as of  March 11, 2013 (“Master Lease”), whether direct, indirect, absolute or contingent, due or to become due, now existing or hereafter arising; and


 


(b)           all indebtedness and liabilities whatsoever of Debtor to Secured Party which in any manner relate to or arise from payments owed to Secured Party under a certain Lease Schedule Termination and Loan Agreement and the related Loan Documents described therein, all dated as of even date herewith, whether direct, indirect, absolute or contingent, due or to become due, now existing or hereafter arising.


 


Except to the extent modified by this First Amendment to Security Agreement, the Security Agreement is hereby ratified and affirmed in its entirety.


 


Witnessed our hands and seals and effective as of this 31st day of July, 2015.


 



	  	
Debtor: SIGNALSHARE, LLC


	 	 
	 	 
	  	  
	
________________________________________

	
By:  /s/  Aaron Dobrinsky                                                         


	
Witness

	
Name:   Aaron Dobrinsky


	  	
Title:     Manager


	  	  
	  	  
	
 

	
Secured Party:  NFS LEASING, INC.


	 	 
	 	 
	  	  
	
________________________________________

	
By:  /s/   Clifford L. Rucker                                                        


	Witness	
Title:    President







 


 


 


 


 


 


 




  





- 1 -
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Composite Technology Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Domonic J. Carney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and


(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the
Company.





Date:
February 9, 2010





/s/
      Domonic J. CarneyDomonic
      J. CarneyChief
      Financial Officer
                  (Principal
      Financial and
Accounting  Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 248 (Monday, December 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78063-78064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30304]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XD658


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting; 
Correction

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of correction of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council's Pacific

[[Page 78064]]

Northwest Crab Industry Advisory Committee (PNCIAC) will meet in 
Seattle, WA. The meeting is open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on January 12, 2015, from 9 a.m. until 
12 noon.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Fishermen's Terminal, Norby 
conference room, 3919 18th Avenue W., Seattle, WA 98199.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 
4th Avenue, Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Diana Stram, Council Staff; 
telephone: (907) 271-2809 or Lance Farr, (206) 669-7163.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The original notice published in the Federal 
Register on December 12, 2014 (79 FR 73884). This notice serves a 
correction to that notice and is being re-published in its entirety due 
to a date change and an addition to the agenda.
    The Committee will discuss issues to recommend for the 10-year 
review of the Crab Rationalization Program and discuss extending the 
Western Baridi fishing season.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Gail Bendixen at (907) 271-2809 at least 7 
working days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: December 22, 2014.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-30304 Filed 12-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
#### Loretta E. Howe, Respondent, *v.*T. M. U. J. M. Fox, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

February 27, 1925.

Master and servant — action for wages — recovery cannot be had for wrongful discharge — complaint cannot be amended on trial to change cause of action — instructions — contract provided plaintiff’s services would be satisfactory to defendant — error to refuse to instruct jury that if defendant was not satisfied with plaintiff’s work and that she was sincere in discharging plaintiff, verdict must be for defendant.

In an action for wages, recovery cannot be had for damages for wrongful discharge predicated upon the amendment of plaintiff’s complaint on trial, since the amendment was not timely and changed the cause of action entirely to defendant’s prejudice.

Moreover, where the contract was to the effect that plaintiff was to perform services satisfactory to the defendant and the defendant’s business involved matters of taste, it was reversible error for the trial court to refuse to charge that if the defendant “ was not satisfied with the plaintiff’s work and that she was sincere in discharging the plaintiff, their verdict must be for the defendant.”

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District, in favor of plaintiff, after trial by the court with a jury.

*Kamen & Ostertag [Sol S. Ostertag*of counsel], for the appellant.

*James A. Palmer,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam:

This judgment must be reversed for the following reasons:

*First.*The action was for wages. The recovery was for damages for wrongful discharge. The statement of the court “ Breach of *506contract would be about the same thing ” was prejudicial before the jury. The subsequent amendment came too late and entirely changed the cause of action. *(Reed*v. *Newman,*31 Misc. 792; *Elliott*v. *Miller,*17 N. Y. Supp. 526; *McNeil*v. *Cobb,*186 App. Div. 177; *Ginsburg*v. *Von Seggern,*59 id. 595.)

*Second.*The contract was to perform services satisfactory to the defendant. The defendant’s business was the production and sale of high grade dresses and millinery. This involved matters of taste. The court charged the jury that they should find for the defendant “ if the plaintiff’s work was of a grossly unsatisfactory character,” and refused to charge that if the defendant *“*was not satisfied with the plaintiff’s work and that she was sincere in discharging the plaintiff, their verdict must be for the defendant.” He accentuated this refusal by charging over exception: *“*They must find that her work was of such a character as would satisfy a reasonable person.” This was error. *(Haehnel v. Trostler,*54 Misc. 262; *Clausen*v. *Vonnoh,*55 id. 220; *Spain*v. *Manhattan Shirt Co.,*177 App. Div. 610; *Delano*v. *Columbia M. Works & M. Iron Co.,*179 id. 153.)

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to the appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Guy, McCook and Proskauer, JJ.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of A

. V ., a child, * From the 90 th District Court

of Stephens County,

Trial Court No. CV32227

No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 003

- C V * June 30 , 20 2 2

* Memorandum Opinion by Trotter , J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that th ere is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the

order of the tr ia l court is in all things affirmed.