alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Provident Financial Group, Inc.'s 10-Q for June 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         225,541
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                34,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                59,794
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,550,187
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      5,588,006
<ALLOWANCE>                                     75,472
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,841,942
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,781,849
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,435,657
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            264,182
<LONG-TERM>                                    668,101
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,000
<COMMON>                                        12,744
<OTHER-SE>                                     672,409
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               7,841,942
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                250,488
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               50,166
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,831
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               302,485
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             109,926
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             166,982
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          135,503
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   10,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               5,716
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                135,535
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 96,504
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      63,050
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,050
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.93
<LOANS-NON>                                     57,924
<LOANS-PAST>                                    10,058
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 9,196
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 17,185
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                71,980
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   12,859
<RECOVERIES>                                     6,351
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               75,472
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            75,472
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
##### 



Company Original Employment Agreement 2005 Letter Agreement Existing Employment Agreement
 Agreement
 Term New Expiration Date
 Base Salary Committee SunCom
 Contractual Payment Subject to Forfeiture




---



##### 



Annual Bonus
 Perquisites st
 Stock Awards Plan
 Benefits Upon Termination Section 1




---



##### 



Definition of Good Reason
 Restrictive Covenants
  Territory
    Dispute Resolution
 Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties agree that prior to the
commencement of any arbitration proceedings to resolve any dispute,
controversy or claim arising in connection with this Agreement, the
parties shall, upon the request of any party, attempt in good faith
to resolve such dispute, controversy or claim through non-binding
mediation pursuant to the Commercial Mediation Rules of the AAA.
All costs and expenses incurred by Executive in connection with such
mediation proceeding (including, without limitation, reasonable
attorneys fees) shall be paid and/or reimbursed by the Company.
 All Other Provisions Remain Effective




---



##### 



Notices
 
 Attention
  
  Attention
  [ Signature Page Follows ]




---



##### 



SunCom Wireless Management Company, Inc.By:
    /s/ Michael E. KalogrisMichael E. KalogrisChief Executive OfficerExecutive/s/ William A. RobinsonWILLIAM A. ROBINSON
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                         345,389
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,166,854
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,617,472
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,189,049
<PP&E>                                       8,183,992
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,321,704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,891,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,358,005
<BONDS>                                        463,210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,010
<COMMON>                                        47,283
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,826,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,891,098
<SALES>                                      2,930,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,930,964
<CGS>                                        2,015,282
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,015,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               577,574
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,906
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                328,834
<INCOME-TAX>                                   152,821
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            176,013
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   176,013
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
#### CHEMICAL BANK NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. PUG SAND AND GRAVEL CORPORATION, John Vanderpool, William Jones, Wallace Kerzon, Donald Green, Ralph Barnett, and Paul Hendricks, Defendants.

Misc. No. 122.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

Nov. 19, 1970.

*148John S. Castellano, Denver, Colo., for plaintiff.

Ben Klein, Denver, Colo., for defendants John Vanderpool, William Jones and Pug Sand & Gravel Corp.

ORDER

THOMPSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff has registered with the Clerk of this District a Judgment rendered February 26, 1970, by the United States District Court for the District of Colorado (28 U.S.C. § 1968).

Plaintiff has moved, pursuant to Rule 4(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that Archie C. Robison, Sheriff of White Pine County, Nevada, be designated to serve “all process and other papers including, but not limited to, Writs of Garnishment and Writs of Attachment herein and to execute and levy upon the property, goods, chattels, lands and tenements of defendant John Vanderpool * * The motion should be denied.

It is the opinion of this Court that the term “all process” in Rule 4(c) is not intended and should not be interpreted to encompass writs authorizing or requiring property to be seized and taken into custodia legis. While process which functions only as notice to a litigant or third party, the obligations of the process server being completed when service is made, may appropriately be accomplished by any qualified person under court authorization, this is not so with respect to process which invokes other duties and responsibilities subject to court supervision and governed by federal statutes. The statutory requirements for bonding a United States Marshal and his deputies (28 U.S.C. § 564), and statutory requirements regarding collection and accounting for fees (28 U.S.C. § 572), the charges for levying upon and keeping seized properties (28 U.S.C. § 1921), and the obligations with respect to judicial sales (28 U.S.C. § 2001, et seq.), for examples, are inapplicable to a person whose sole official connection with court administration is a designation under Rule 4(c) as a person qualified and authorized to make service.

The case of United States for the Use of Tanos v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co., 361 F.2d 838 (5th Cir. 1966), is not inconsistent. The Court there held that Rule 4(c) “governs the service of writs of garnishment issued in a proceeding in a federal court”, but did not declare that a court should exercise its discretion to direct service by someone other than the United States Marshal. The dissenting opinion clearly is premised bn the assumption that the process server’s function was completed when the paper was delivered. This is not the case under the broad authorization contemplated in the instant motion. Accordingly,

It hereby is ordered that the motion for designation under Rule 4(c) of a person other than the United States Marshal to make service and levies of writs of execution, attachment and garnishment be, and it hereby is, denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CRIMINAL NO. 15-00056-CG

)

JAMES ALFRED STRINGFELLOW, )

)

Defendant. )

DETENTION ORDER

This matter came on for a bond revocation hearing on November 10, 2015, 

during which the defendant admitted to the allegations in the petition dated 

October 28, 2015, and the United States moved for detention pending sentencing.

The court finds that there is clear and convincing evidence that the defendant 

has violated the conditions of release, and that the defendant is unlikely to abide by 

any condition or combination of conditions of release, and hereby REVOKES the 

conditions as set forth in the Order Setting Conditions of Release entered on May 

19, 2015 (Doc. 11). Therefore, the defendant is REMANDED to the custody of the 

United States Marshal pending his sentencing hearing currently scheduled for

December 14, 2015.

The United States Marshal is ORDERED to produce the defendant for the 

sentencing hearing at 1:00 p.m. on December 14, 2015.

DONE and ORDERED this 10th day of November, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cr-00056-CG-B Document 28 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 1
Amendment
to Purchase Agreement between Accelera Innovations, Inc.


 


And


 


Traditions
Home Health, Inc., Dated January 5, 2015


 


That
Paragraph 3(a) of the Purchase Agreement provided for a closing date for the transaction stated above of March 31, 2015, and made
provision for an additional 45 day extension.


 


That
the Parties herein agree to amend the closing date to June 30, 2015.


 


	Accelera
    Innovations, Inc.	 	Traditions
    Home Health, Inc.
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Cindy Boerum	 	By:	/s/
    Sonny Nix
		Cindy Boerum,
    President	 	 	Sonny Nix,
    CEO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

FIDELITY BANK, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION 15-0031-WS-M

 )

KEY HOTELS OF BREWTON, LLC, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

In accordance with the separate Order entered on this date, it is ordered, adjudged and 

decreed that DEFAULT JUDGMENT be, and the same hereby is, entered in favor of plaintiff 

Fidelity Bank and against defendants Key Hotels of Brewton, LLC and Anand Patel, jointly and 

severally, in the amount of $2,044,311.94.

DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of January, 2016.

s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00031-WS-M Document 65 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GEORGE BONNER, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0028-CG-M

)

LEE POSEY DANIELS, )

)

Respondent. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo

determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, 

the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) 

is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that this habeas petition is DENIED as time-barred, that 

this action is hereby DISMISSED. It is further ORDERED that any certificate of 

appealability filed by Petitioner be DENIED as he is not entitled to appeal in forma

pauperis.

DONE and ORDERED this 30th day of August, 2016.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00028-CG-M Document 20 Filed 08/30/16 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 101


		
			CITADEL CINEMAS, INC.
		

		
			6100 Center Drive,  Suite 900
		

		
			Los Angeles, CA  90045
		

		
			William D. Ellis – General Counsel
		

		
			William.Ellis@readingrdi.com 
		

		
			Telephone:  (213) 235-2240
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			June 5, 2015
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Via Email
		

		
			 
		

		
			Sutton Hill Capital, LLC
		

		
			c/o The Decurion Corporation
		

		
			120 N. Robertson Boulevard
		

		
			Los Angeles, CA  90048
		

		
			Attn:  James Vandever
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Re:Sutton Hill Properties, LLC
		

		
			 
		

		
			Gentlemen:
		

		
			Reference is made to that certain First Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Sutton Hill Properties, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (the “Company”), dated as of June 28, 2007, by and between Citadel Cinemas, Inc. (“Citadel”) and Sutton Hill Capital, LLC (“SHC”) (as amended by that certain First Amendment to the First Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Sutton Hill Properties, LLC, the “Operating Agreement,” to which reference is made for capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein).
		

		
			Specifically, reference is made to Section 2.5 of the Operating Agreement, which requires the consent of SHC before the Company proceeds with the redevelopment plan for the Third Avenue Property, which involves its redevelopment into a residential or hotel tower, with appropriate amenities, either individually or as part of a joint venture that would be formed with an adjoining landowner.  Please indicate your consent to this redevelopment plan -- as may be modified in the reasonable discretion of Citadel without the need for further approval of SHC -- by executing this letter where indicated below and returning it to me at your earliest convenience.
		

		

		

		 

 


		

			Sutton Hill Capital, LLC

		


		

			Attn:  James Vandever

		


		

			June 5, 2015

		


		

			Page 3

		


		

			 

		


		

			 

		




		
		

		
			Thank you very much for your time and cooperation.
		

		
			 
		

		
			CITADEL CINEMAS, INC.,
		

		
			a Nevada corporation
		

		
			 
		

		
			By:/s/ William D. Ellis
		

		
			Name:William D. Ellis
		

		
			Title:Secretary
		

		
			Acknowledged and Agreed:
		

		
			SUTTON HILL CAPITAL, LLC,
		

		
			a New York limited liability company 
		

		
			 
		

		
			By:/s/ James D. Vandever
		

		
			Name:James D. Vandever
		

		
			Title:Non-Member Manager
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-88848) and Forms S-3 (No.s 333-60664, 333-81338
and 333-91568) of AdStar, Inc. of our report dated February 22, 2002 except for
the subsequent events described in Note 9 to the 2001 financial statements as to
which the date is March 15, 2002, relating to the financial statements of
Adstar, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001, which appears in this Form
10-KSB.


/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 31, 2003
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2261 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Food Safety and Inspection Service for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Food Safety and Inspection Service for fiscal year 

2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2261 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, AGRI3 CULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE, FOOD 

4 SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE FOR FIS5 CAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Mar9 keting Service, Food Safety and Inspection Service for fis10 cal year 2024 may not exceed $1,049,344,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2013 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health 

and Human Services, The Administration for Children and Families, 

Promoting Safe and Stable Families for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health and Human Services, The Administration for Children and Families, Promoting Safe and 

Stable Families for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2013 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV3 ICES, THE ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN 

4 AND FAMILIES, PROMOTING SAFE AND STA5 BLE FAMILIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Department of Health and Human Services, The 

9 Administration for Children and Families, Promoting Safe 

10 and Stable Families for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

11 $427,515,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of BTU
International, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

     1.   the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
          ended July 3, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
          of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company for the periods covered by the Report.


                                        /S/ Thomas P. Kealy
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Thomas P. Kealy
                                        Vice President, Corporate Controller
                                        and Chief Accounting Officer (principal
                                        financial and accounting officer)

Dated: August 17, 2005
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1849 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Offices of 

the Majority and Minority Leader for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Offices of the Majority and Minority Leader for 

fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 SENATE, OFFICES OF THE MAJORITY AND MI5 NORITY LEADER FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:36 Apr 13, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1849.IH H1849

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1849 IH

1 able for Senate, Offices of the Majority and Minority 

2 Leader for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $5,399,576. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jesus Fuentes, Appellant.

[966 NYS2d 909]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated January 28, 2002 *(People v Fuentes,*290 AD2d 563 [2002], *cert denied*537 US 1201 [2003]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered July 30, 1998.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Dickerson and Austin, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2235 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2235

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
  of Agriculture, Executive Operations, Office of Budget and Program 
                     Analysis for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
  of Agriculture, Executive Operations, Office of Budget and Program 
                     Analysis for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR US DEPARTMENT OF 
              AGRICULTURE, EXECUTIVE OPERATIONS, OFFICE OF BUDGET AND 
              PROGRAM ANALYSIS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for US Department of 
Agriculture, Executive Operations, Office of Budget and Program 
Analysis for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $9,525,000.
                                 <all>
```