alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1947 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1947

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
   Labor, Bureau of International Labor Affairs for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the 
 Committees on Education and the Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
   Labor, Bureau of International Labor Affairs for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 
              BUREAU OF INTERNATIONAL LABOR AFFAIRS FOR FISCAL YEAR 
              2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Labor, 
Bureau of International Labor Affairs for fiscal year 2024 may not 
exceed $59,825,000.
                                 <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2130 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, 

National Archives and Records Administration, Repairs and Restoration 

for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, National Archives and Records Administration, Repairs and Restoration for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES, NATIONAL AR5 CHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, RE6 PAIRS AND RESTORATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 

7 2024. 

8 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

9 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:06 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2130.IH H2130

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2130 IH

1 able for Independent Agencies, National Archives and 

2 Records Administration, Repairs and Restoration for fis3 cal year 2024 may not exceed $7,500,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1892 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1892

   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of 
Representatives, Salaries and Expenses of the Office of the Legislative 
               Counsel of the House for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of 
Representatives, Salaries and Expenses of the Office of the Legislative 
               Counsel of the House for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR HOUSE OF 
              REPRESENTATIVES, SALARIES AND EXPENSES OF THE OFFICE OF 
              THE LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL OF THE HOUSE FOR FISCAL YEAR 
              2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for House of Representatives, 
Salaries and Expenses of the Office of the Legislative Counsel of the 
House for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $11,937,000.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SANTA FE PACIFIC PIPELINE PARTNERS, L.P. AS
OF AND FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          43,774
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,143
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,540
<PP&E>                                         734,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                 105,423
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 734,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,358
<BONDS>                                        355,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     272,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   734,532
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               179,714
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,145
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,374
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 48,422
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             46,860
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,860
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.37
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
STACY M. PACK, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4464 ) DOUG DAVIS, ) ) Respondent. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed March 23, 2018. Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Polk County; Catherine L. Combee, Judge. Jean Marie Henne of Jean M. Henne, P.A., Winter Haven, for Petitioner William J. Lobb and Nicholas C. Mohr of Law Office of William J. Lobb, Bartow, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed.

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     INTERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
     ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     560,137

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         560,137
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  493,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    35,339
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,100,225
<PP&E>                                         6,590,223
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,960,032)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,263,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,102,585
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       70,330
<OTHER-SE>                                     414,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,263,987
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,316,803
<CGS>                                          825,144
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  450,254
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             93,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (52,296)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (52,296)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (52,296)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
#### Herbert Moreira-Brown, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[971 NYS2d 527]—

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann BriganttiHughes, J), entered March 25, 2011, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly granted in this matter where plaintiff, a public figure, alleges that defendant Detective Rivera made false and defamatory statements about him to the press. The record demonstrates that all of the statements attributed to Rivera about plaintiff were true, namely, that plaintiff was being sought for questioning; that repeated efforts to locate plaintiff had been unsuccessful; and that the case involved an allegation of rape. The fact that these truths may have been fatal to plaintiffs bid for public office have no bearing on whether they were legally defamatory. Moreover, plaintiff has failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the alleged statements were actuated by ill will *(see e.g. Konrad v Brown,*91 AD3d 545 [1st Dept 2012], *lv denied*19 NY3d 804 [2012]).

Plaintiff’s contention that the motion was untimely is unpreserved and may not be raised for the first time on appeal *(see Shaw v Silver,*95 AD3d 416 [1st Dept 2012]). In any event, the record shows that the motion was timely filed in accordance with a court order extending defendants’ time to file the motion.

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Sweeny, J.E, DeGrasse, ManzanetDaniels and Clark, JJ.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60414 Conference Calendar

HENRY MARTIN ROCHA-BARAHONA, Petitioner,

versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

A26 548 709

- - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Henry Martin Rocha-Barahona petitions this court to review the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision denying his application to reopen his suspension of deportation proceeding. Rocha-Barahona contends that he has presented new evidence showing that his deportation will cause extreme hardship. We have reviewed the record, the BIA’s decision, and the briefs and find no abuse of discretion. See Hernandez-Cordero v. INS , 819 F.2d 558, 560 (5th Cir. 1987) (en banc).No. 96-60469 - 2 - PETITION DENIED.
Exhibit
31(e)





CERTIFICATIONI,
      JOHN F. SIPICS, certify that:1.
    I
      havereviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofPPL
      Electric Utilities Corporation (the "registrant");2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material factnecessaryto
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this report;3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in allmaterialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    Theregistrant'sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
  have:a.
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;b.
    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual
      report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and5.
    Theregistrant'sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
      evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a.
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
andb.
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.Date:
      November 3, 2005
    /s/  John
      F.
      SipicsJohn
      F. Sipics
      President
      PPL
      Electric Utilities
Corporation
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ANA LICIA BRAVO,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

08-14-00160-CR

Appeal from the

County Criminal Court No. 2 

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2012C07668) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore reverse the conviction and remand the cause for a new trial, in 

accordance with the opinion of this Court. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2016.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
LNT 6.30.2015 10-Q Ex 10.3






Exhibit 10.3


SECOND AMENDMENT
TO THE ALLIANT ENERGY RABBI TRUST AGREEMENT OF
ALLIANT ENERGY CORPORATION


This Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Alliant Energy Rabbi Trust Agreement dated as of December 29, 2005 (as amended, amended and restated or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Trust Agreement”) is made by and between Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc., an Iowa corporation (the “Sponsor”) and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a national banking association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), effective as of the execution date appearing below.  Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Trust Agreement.
WHEREAS, the Sponsor and the Trustee entered into the Trust Agreement establishing a trust effective January 1, 2006 (the “Trust”) relating to the payment of deferred compensation under the terms of the various nonqualified plans (each referred to herein as a “Plan”) listed in Appendix A to the Trust Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Sponsor desires to amend the Trust Agreement as provided below; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 12.1 of the Trust Agreement, the Trust Agreement may be amended by the Sponsor and the Trustee; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 12.3 of the Trust Agreement, the Sponsor has determined that this Amendment will not reduce, impair, or otherwise adversely affect the rights or protections of any participant of any Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, the Sponsor and the Trustee, pursuant to Section 12.1 of the Trust Agreement, hereby agree to amend the Trust Agreement as follows:
Section 1.  Amendment:  Section 1 of the Trust Agreement shall be amended by adding the following new Section 1.10 thereto:
1.10. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no Company as defined in the Trust Agreement shall make or cause to be made any contribution to or payment from any Plan Account with respect to any Plan participant (or such Plan participant’s beneficiary) in the event that such contribution or payment would result in a property transfer and income inclusion for such Plan participant under the operation of Section 409A(b)(3) of the Code.
Section 2.  Effect of Amendment:  On and after the effectiveness of this Amendment, each reference in the Trust Agreement to “this Agreement”, the “Trust Agreement”, “hereunder”, “hereof” or words of like import referring to the Trust Agreement, shall mean and be a reference to the Trust Agreement, as amended by this Amendment.  Except as amended hereby, the Trust Agreement continues and shall remain in full force and effect in all respects.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed as of the 5th day of August, 2015.
ALLIANT ENERGY CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.


/s/ Wayne A. Reschke
By:  Wayne A. Reschke
Title:  Vice President, Human Resources


WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.


/s/ Andrew J. Franck
By:  Andrew J. Franck
Title:  Vice President
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARC WEINBERGER

, Appellant,

v.

E NB PROPERTIES, LLC

, Appellee.

No. 4D 2 0 2 2

- 2956

[ February 15, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County; Andrea Ruth Gundersen , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 14

-

004643

.

Kenzie N. Sadlak of Kenzie N. Sadlak, PA, Miami, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, K UNTZ and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF HANDSPRING, INC.

<Table>
<Caption>
                                            Jurisdiction of               Percentage Owned
                                            Incorporation or             by Handspring, Inc.
              Name                            Organization            (directly or indirectly)
              ----                          ----------------          ------------------------
<S>                                     <C>                                     <C>
Handspring FSC, Inc.                    Barbados                                100%
Handspring International Ltd.           British Virgin Islands                  100%
Handspring Canada, Inc.                 Canada                                  100%
Handspring Denmark ApS                  Denmark                                 100%
Handspring France Sarl                  France                                  100%
Handspring GmbH                         Germany                                 100%
Handspring Italy SRL                    Italy                                   100%
Handspring KK                           Japan                                   100%
Handspring B.V.                         Netherlands                             100%
Handspring Singapore Pte. Ltd.          Singapore                               100%
Handspring International Sarl           Switzerland                             100%
Handspring UK Ltd.                      United Kingdom                          100%
</Table>