alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1958
RICHARD L. EVANS; FRANK M. PECK, JR., Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus ROBERT G. CHAFIN, of the Circuit Court of Wayne County, West Virginia; WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT, State of West Virginia; EARL C. BEVINS; W. NICHOLAS REYNOLDS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CA-97-222-3) Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 13, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard L. Evans, Frank M. Peck, Jr., Appellants Pro Se. JohnAlbert Grafton, Noelle Aimee Starek, SHUMAN, ANNAND & POE, Charleston, West Virginia; P. Nathan Bowles, Jr., BOWLES, RICE, MCDAVID, GRAFF & LOVE, Charleston, West Virginia; Joseph Michael Farrell, Jr., FARRELL, FARRELL & FARRELL, L.C., Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court's order denying relief on their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no rever sible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Evans v. Chafin , No. CA-97-222-3 (S.D.W. Va. June 25, 1997). We deny Appellants' motion for leave to present status report and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2025 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2025

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
        Education, Rehabilitation Services for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
        Education, Rehabilitation Services for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF 
              EDUCATION, REHABILITATION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Education, 
Rehabilitation Services for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $0.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                      5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000

       

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                         64,781
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  190,123
<ALLOWANCES>                   4,008
<INVENTORY>                    169,098
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               429,093
<PP&E>                         346,650
<DEPRECIATION>                 209,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 663,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          119,982
<BONDS>                        40,377
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    0
<COMMON>                       685
<OTHER-SE>                     484,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   663,018
<SALES>                        225,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               225,715
<CGS>                          138,229
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  138,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               47,665
<LOSS-PROVISION>               191
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             1,259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                39,333
<INCOME-TAX>                   13,766
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            25,567
<DISCONTINUED>                 1,227
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                   24,340
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                  0.27
<FN>
All amounts in this exhibit have been restated to reflect the disposal of the
company's network products business, as well as a three-for-two stock split for
stockholders of record on February 25, 1997.
</FN>


        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAVID MALONE, #175140, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 14-576-KD-M

ROBERT BENTLEY, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this 

file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo

determination of those portions of the recommendation to which

objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED 

as the opinion of this Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action be and is 

hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, prior to service of process, 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as malicious. 

DONE this the 10th day of April 2015. 

s/Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00576-KD-M Document 9 Filed 04/10/15 Page 1 of 1
[ARTICLE] 5
[LEGEND]
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
[/LEGEND]
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1997
[PERIOD-END]                               MAR-31-1997
[CASH]                                              55
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                    3,042
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                 4,986
[PP&E]                                         145,623
[DEPRECIATION]                                   1,094
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 151,319
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                        3,275,305
[BONDS]                                              0
[COMMON]                                        14,565
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[OTHER-SE]                                           0
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                   151,319
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                     0
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                   70,390
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                      0
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                                  0
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                  (70,390)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                   (.005)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                   (.005)
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         859,932
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               859,932
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 859,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,308
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        73,755
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   854,932
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                663,984
<INCOME-TAX>                                   300,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                742,484
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   363,984
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.94
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of A ppeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 17, 2023

No. 04

- 22

- 00020

- CV

WHATABURGER RESTAURANTS LLC and Crystal Krueger,

Appellants

v.

Sadok FERCHICHI and Martina Coronado,

Appellees

From the 150th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2 020CI15548

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellees’ motion for extension of time to file their motion for rehearing and motion for

en banc reconsideration is GRANTED. Appellees’ deadline for filing their motion for rehearing

and motion for en banc r econsideration is extended to January 20, 2023.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHER EOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of January, 2023

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jagdish Rampersad, Appellant.

[973 NYS2d 578]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Aloise, J.), rendered November 15, 2012, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and unlawful possession of pistol ammunition, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenges to certain remarks the prosecutor made in summation are unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the defendant’s challenges are without merit as the remarks constituted fair comment *(see People v Withfield,*106 AD3d 760, 761 [2013], *lv denied*21 NY3d 1021 [2013]).

By specifically declining the trial court’s invitation to charge a lesser-included offense, the defendant waived his current claim that it was error not to charge criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree as a lesser-included offense of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree *(see*CPL 300.50; *People v Goodwine,*46 AD3d 702, 703 [2007]; *People v Brown,*262 AD2d 569, 570 [1999]).

The defendant was not deprived of his right to the effective assistance of counsel under either the Federal or State Constitution *(see Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit. Mastro, J.P., Angiolillo, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT32.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. (CRM) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence Fensterstock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   By:  /s/ Lawrence Fensterstock
 Lawrence Fensterstock Chief Financial Officer  August 9, 2007  21
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 19, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128839 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 128839 

 COA: 249618 

Wayne CC: 02-012731-01 

KEITH LAMAR CLARK, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 21, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1012 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 19, 2005 

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Partners X 1997 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000317900
<NAME> ANGELES PARTNERS X
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             487
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          19,986
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,135)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         18,729
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,007)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,264
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,159
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,321
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (162)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (162)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (162)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (8.58)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Angeles Partners X (the"Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D.Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, andStephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-30924

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DEREK SMITH, also known as Derek Anthony Smith

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:02-CR-385-1

Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Derek Smith has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Smith has filed a response. Our independent review of the record,

counsel’s brief, and Smith’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Smith’s motion to supplement his response is DENIED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 28, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

              Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
                   18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     I, Jonathan Stern, Chief Financial Officer of Register.com, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.(Section)1350 adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (i) The Company's accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                             /s/ Jonathan Stern
                                             ------------------
                                             Jonathan Stern
                                             Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  March 11, 2004
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               675000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              675000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        15000
<BONDS>                                     675000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                      6000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (21000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 15000
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             14210
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (14210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (14210)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (14210)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0



</TABLE>
#### Richard G. Sprague II et al., Appellants, v State of New York, Respondent.

[828 NYS2d 433]

*844In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the claimants appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Marin, J.), dated June 15, 2005, which, upon a decision of the same court dated May 23, 2005 made after a nonjury trial on the issue of liability, dismissed the claim.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On an appeal from a judgment entered after a nonjury trial, the power of this Court to review the evidence “ ‘is as broad as that of the trial court, bearing in mind . . . that due regard must be given to the decision of the Trial Judge who was in a position to assess the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses’ ” *(Tornheim v Kohn,*31 AD3d 748 [2006], quoting *Universal Leasing Servs. v Flushing Hae Kwan Rest.,*169 AD2d 829 [1991]; *see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford,*60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]; *Letterese v State of New York,*33 AD3d 593 [2006]; *779 E. N.Y. Ave. Assoc., LLC v Gurary,*31 AD3d 627 [2006]). Here, the trial court found that the subject accident was caused solely by the negligence of the driver who was operating the vehicle in which the injured claimant was a passenger. The trial court’s finding that the failure of this driver to yield the right of way to oncoming traffic was the sole proximate cause of the accident, and that the State’s alleged negligence in removing and failing to reinstall a channelizing traffic island at the accident site did not contribute to the occurrence of the accident, is supported by the record, and we find no reason to disturb it *(see Weathers v Grix,*273 AD2d 463 [2000]; *Iwaszkiewicz v Callanan Indus.,*258 AD2d 776 [1999]; *Hersman v Hadley,*235 AD2d 714 [1997]; *Lugo v Brentwood Union Free School Dist.,*212 AD2d 582 [1995]; *Cimino v City of New York,*54 AD2d 843, 844 [1976], *affd*43 NY2d 966 [1978]). Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Krausman and Rivera, JJ., concur.