alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21.1 XM SATELLITE RADIO HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Subsidiaries XM Satellite Radio Inc.
    
    State of DelawareXM Equipment Leasing LLC
    
    State of DelawareXM EMall Inc.
    
    State of DelawareXM Radio Inc.
    
    State of DelawareXM Innovations Inc.
    
    State of DelawareXM Capital Resources Inc.
    
    State of DelawareXM 1500 Eckington LLC
    
    State of DelawareXM Investment LLC
    
    State of DelawareEffanel Music, Inc.
    
    State of New YorkInteroperable Technologies LLC
    
    State of DelawareSatellite Public Radio Inc.
    
    Washington, D.C.
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

 

**SYMBION, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Symbion, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Richard E. Francis, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|                  | /s/  Richard E. Francis, Jr. |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                  | Richard  E. Francis, Jr.     |
|                  | Chief  Executive Officer          |
|                  |                              |
|                  |                              |
| Date: October 5, 2010 |                              |

 

----
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2175 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. Department 

of Interior, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 

Regulation and Technology for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. 

Department of Interior, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Regulation and Technology 

for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2175 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, OFFICE OF 

3 SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND EN4 FORCEMENT, REGULATION AND TECH5 NOLOGY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for U.S. Department of Interior, Office of Surface 

9 Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Regulation and 

10 Technology for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

11 $115,804,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ZAKKAWUNDA MOSS, #524910 )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0310-CG-B

)

SERGEANT ASHELY KIDD, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order entered this date, this action is DISMISSED 

without prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) 

for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of February, 2016.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00310-CG-B Document 18 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ricky-Jo Mahoney, Appellant.

[972 NYS2d 921]

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), rendered January 5, 2012, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Hayes, J.), upon a finding that he violated conditions thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal contempt in the first degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, “the court made a sufficient inquiry into defendant’s complaints concerning the alleged lack of communication between defendant and defense counsel. The court ‘repeatedly allowed defendant to air his concerns about defense counsel, and after listening to them reasonably concluded that defendant’s vague and generic objections had no merit or substance’ ” *(People v Reese,*23 AD3d 1034, 1035 [2005], quoting *People v Linares, 2*NY3d 507, 511 [2004]). Also contrary to the defendant’s contention, defense counsel at no point took a position adverse to the defendant’s interests *(cf. People v Vega,*88 AD3d 1022, 1022-1023 [2011]). In sum, the defendant was not deprived of meaningful representation *(see generally People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 146-147 [1981]). Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.
---

EXHIBIT 32

WRITTEN STATEMENT PURSUANT
TO18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The
undersigned, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of ACME Communications, Inc. (the Company) hereby
certify that, to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350:

| | (i) the annual report on Form 10-K for the twelve months ending December 31, 2006
of the Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: March 30, 2007 |  | By:  /s/ Thomas D. Allen
        Thomas D. Allen
        Executive VP &
Chief Financial Officer    
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | By:  /s/ Jamie Kellner
        Jamie Kellner    
   Chief Executive Officer & Chairman of the Board
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                RULE 13a-14(b) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


         In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K, (the "Report"), of
Triton PCS Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date
hereof, I, David D. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as appropriate, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                    /s/ David D, Clark
                                    ------------------------------
                                    Name: David D. Clark
                                    Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                    Date: March 12, 2004

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Triton PCS
Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Triton PCS Holdings, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

         This certification "accompanies" the annual report on Form 10-K to
which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Triton
PCS Holdings, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the
date of the annual report on Form 10-K, irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing).
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, theChief Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of HCSB FinancialCorporation (the “Company”), certifies that, to his knowledge on the date ofthis certification:

 

1.               The annual report of the Company for theperiod ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on this date (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | March 18, 2010 |   | By:    | /s/James  R. Clarkson                         |
|--------|---------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   |                |   |   | James R. Clarkson                             |
|   |                |   |   | President &  Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                |   |   |                                          |
| Date:  | March 18, 2010 |   | By:    | /s/Edward  L. Loehr, Jr.                 |
|   |                |   |   | Edward L.  Loehr, Jr.                    |
|   |                |   |   | Principal Financial  Officer                  |

 

1

----
_____________ No. 95-3801SI

_____________ Milton Weir, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * State of Iowa, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: May 17, 1996 Filed: May 22, 1996

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Mi ltonWeir appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C . § 2254 petition. Weir contends the district court incorrectly decided tha t review of Weir's search warrant claim was precluded by Stone v. Powell , 42 8 U.S. 465 (1976), and Willett v. Lockhart , 37 F.3d 1265 (8th Cir. 1994) . Weir al so contends his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance . Because the controlli ng legal principles are clear and are easily applied to Wei r's circumstances, we believe an opinion would lack precedentia l value. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the judgment of the district court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
11566.

#### Neal *v.*City of Dublin.

Decided July 14, 1920.

Petition for certiorari; from Laurens superior court—-Judge Kent. March 25, 1920.

On the charge of idling and loitering in violation of an ordinance of the City of Dublin, Neal was convicted in the recorder’s court of that city. The only witness at the trial testified: *“I*have seen [the defendant] in the City of Dublin, . . walking along the streets. . . If he had any occupation I did not know it; he did not have any that I knew of. He would be standing around when I saw him, whittling and talking. Would see him all times of the day and night. I asked him what he was doing, and he said he wasn’t doing anything. I have seen him in the last six months around on the streets here in Dublin. I have never seen him at work. I couldn’t say he didn’t work, but I have never seemhim at work.” The ordinance referred to provides that “ Any person who in this city is found loitering, rambling, wandering, prowling, or loafing about the streets, alleys, public thoroughfares, or premises in the daytime or nighttime, and who can not give a good account of himself or herself, shall be arrested and upon conviction shall be punished as prescribed in . . . this code.”

*W. A. Dampier,*for plaintiff in error.

*T. W. Evans,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

The judgment of the recorder of the City of Dublin was not without some evidence to support it, and the' judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction the certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         000840402
<NAME>                        GREKA ENERGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                            485,015
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   6,027,306
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (161,500)
<INVENTORY>                                     7,337,608
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               15,838,766
<PP&E>                                         71,160,415
<DEPRECIATION>                                  6,340,722
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 82,656,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          35,213,327
<BONDS>                                         8,286,236
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                     7,411,756
<COMMON>                                       36,640,573
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,635,543)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   82,656,991
<SALES>                                        18,077,497
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               18,682,475
<CGS>                                           6,611,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  15,462,045
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,334,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,003,084
<INCOME-TAX>                                      472,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,530,984
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,530,984
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MATERIALISE NV (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Johan Albrecht, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2018



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Johan Albrecht     
|    |  | Johan Albrecht         
|    |  | Alfinco BVBA           
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION

I, J. Frank
Harrison, III, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                                                               
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 4, 2016 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ J. Frank Harrison, III                                    
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | J. Frank Harrison, III                                        
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
#### Caldwell & Harwood *v.*Trustees of Town of Shelbyville.

Towns — Power of Chairman of Board of Trustees.

In the absence of any power given to the chairman of the board of trustees of a town to bind the town by contract, no such power exists, and where he acts against the wishes of a majority of the board in attempting to make a contract his action is void.

APPEAL PROM SHELBY CIRCUIT COURT.

October 12, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

We have been referred to no authority by the learned counsel sustaining the right of appellants to recover upon the facts alleged *843in the petition. The contract with the chairman of the board of trustees of the town of Shelbyville must be regarded as having been made in his individual capacity, in the absence of any power conferred upon him by the town charter to make such a contract, and since the facts alleged show that he was acting against the wishes of a majority of the board in employing counsel to prevent the town, through its trustees, from taking stock in the gas company.

*Caldwell & Harwood, for appellants. J. S. Morris, for appellees.*

Those having the power to contract with and employ counsel, not only failed to invest the chairman of their board with this right, but were resisting his whole action in the premises. The trustees had the right, as a board, to employ counsel to prevent the citizens in their attempt to nullify the action of a majority of the board, and the fact that the chairman of the board was correct in his views as to the legality of the act by which the stock was taken or the money subscribed, raises no implied promise on the part of the board as such, to pay him or the counsel employed.by him for their services. The chairman in this case was not acting in pursuance of any resolution of the board, but was acting with the avowed purpose of defeating the will of a majority of the board.

When acting officially, he must show his authority to bind the corporation, and this is a difficult undertaking when it is admitted that he was attempting to do an act that those from whom he must have derived the power to make such contract were at the time resisting. The judgment of the court below is *affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.1

BULOVA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I John D Stanton, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John D. StantonJohn D. StantonPrincipal Executive Officer
May 27, 2010
#### James BUTLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; S. Dewalt, Warden; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-7418.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2007.

Decided Dec. 28, 2007.

James Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Butler appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Butler v. DeWalt,*No. 1:05-cv-00387-WMN (D.Md. filed July 24, 2007 & entered July 25, 2007). We dispense *571with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*