Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 249 / Tuesday, December 30, 2014 / Proposed Rules 78369 

and electronically ensure the waterway 

is clear before the bridge closes. The 

video and sensors are located and 

monitored at the remote operating 

location in Mt. Laurel, NJ. The channel 

sensors signal will be a direct input to 

the bridge control system. In the event 

of failure or obstruction of the infrared 

channel sensors, the bridge will 

automatically stop closing and the 

South Jersey Train Dispatcher will 

return the bridge to the open position. 

In the event of video failure the bridge 

will remain in the full open position. 

(6) The Conrail Railroad center span 

light will change from fixed green to 

flashing red anytime the bridge is not in 

the full open position. 

(7) Prior to downward movement of 

the span, the horn will sound two 

prolonged blasts, followed by a pause, 

and then two short blasts until the 

bridge is seated and locked down. At 

the time of movement, the center span 

light will change from fixed green to 

flashing red and remain flashing until 

the bridge has returned to its full open 

position. 

(8) When the train controller at Mt. 

Laurel has verified that rail traffic has 

cleared, they will sound the horn five 

times to signal the draw is about to 

return to its full open position. 

(9) During upward movement of the 

span, the horn will sound two 

prolonged blasts, followed by a pause, 

and then sound two short blasts until 

the bridge is in the full open position. 

The center span light will continue to 

flash red until the bridge is in the fully 

open position. 

(10) When the draw cannot be 

operated from the remote site, a bridge 

tender must be called to operate the 

bridge in the traditional manner. 

Personnel shall be dispatched to arrive 

at the bridge as soon as possible, but not 

more than one hour after malfunction or 

disability of the remote system. 

* * * * * 

Dated: December 11, 2014. 

Stephen P. Metruck, 

Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard, 

Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 2014–30451 Filed 12–29–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2014–0751] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Triathlon National 

Championships, Milwaukee Harbor, 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

establish a safety zone within 

Milwaukee Harbor in Milwaukee, 

Wisconsin. This zone is intended to 

restrict vessels from a portion of 

Milwaukee Harbor due to the 2015 

Olympic and Sprint Distance National 

Championships. This proposed safety 

zone is necessary to protect the 

surrounding public and vessels from the 

hazards associated with the 2015 

Olympic and Sprint Distance National 

Championships. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before January 29, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2014–0751 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Delivery: Same as mail address 

above, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. The telephone number is 202– 

366–9329. 

See the ‘‘Public Participation and 

Request for Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. To avoid duplication, please 

use only one of these four methods. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or email Petty Officer Joseph 

McCollum, U.S. Coast Guard Sector 

Lake Michigan; telephone 414–747– 

7148, email Joseph.P.McCollum@

uscg.mil. If you have questions on 

viewing or submitting material to the 

docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program 

Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 

202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Acronyms 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

A. Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http://

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

1. Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2014–0751), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online at http://

www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online, it will be considered 

received by the Coast Guard when you 

successfully transmit the comment. If 

you fax, hand deliver, or mail your 

comment, it will be considered as 

having been received by the Coast 

Guard when it is received at the Docket 

Management Facility. We recommend 

that you include your name and a 

mailing address, an email address, or a 

telephone number in the body of your 

document so that we can contact you if 

we have questions regarding your 

submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu 

select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert 

‘‘USCG–2014–0751’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the 

balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. 

If you submit your comments by mail or 

hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change the rule based on your 

comments. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
78370 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 249 / Tuesday, December 30, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

2. Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, type the 

docket number USCG–2014–0751 in the 

‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘Search.’’ 

Click on Open Docket Folder on the line 

associated with this rulemaking. You 

may also visit the Docket Management 

Facility in Room W12–140 on the 

ground floor of the Department of 

Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation to use 

the Docket Management Facility. 

3. Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

4. Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. You may submit a request for 

one using one of the four methods 

specified under ADDRESSES. Please 

explain why you believe a public 

meeting would be beneficial. If we 

determine that one would aid this 

rulemaking, we will hold one at a time 

and place announced by a later notice 

in the Federal Register. 

B. Regulatory History and Information 

The Coast Guard established a 

temporary safety zone in Milwaukee 

Harbor for the Olympic and Sprint 

Distance National Championships 

which were scheduled for August of 

2013 and 2014. On May 24, 2013, the 

Coast Guard published a TFR entitled 

Safety Zone; USA Triathlon; Milwaukee 

Harbor, Milwaukee, Wisconsin in the 

Federal Register (78 FR 31415). That 

final rule published after a notice of 

proposed rulemaking was submitted for 

public comment in the Federal Register 

(78 FR 19158). 

C. Basis and Purpose 

The legal basis for the rule is the 

Coast Guard’s authority to establish 

safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 33 CFR 

1.05–1, 160.5; Department of Homeland 

Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

In 2014, the Coast Guard was 

informed that the Olympic and Sprint 

Distance National Championships are 

scheduled to return to Milwaukee 

Harbor in 2015. Within and around 

Milwaukee Harbor at Lakeshore inlet, 

this event is expected to involve 

thousands of participants competing in 

a swim race surrounded by thousands of 

spectators. The swim portion of this 

event is anticipated to occur on three 

days during the second week of August, 

2015. The Captain of the Port Lake 

Michigan has determined that the 

likelihood of transiting watercraft 

during the swim competition involving 

a large number of competitors presents 

a significant risk of serious injuries or 

fatalities. 

D. Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The Captain of the Port Lake 

Michigan has determined that a safety 

zone is necessary to mitigate the 

aforementioned safety risks. Thus, this 

proposed rule establishes a safety zone 

that encompasses all waters of 

Milwaukee Harbor, including Lakeshore 

inlet and the Marina at Pier Wisconsin, 

west of an imaginary line across the 

entrance to the Marina at Pier 

Wisconsin connecting coordinates 

43°02.253′ N, 087°53.623′ W and 

43°01.737′ N, 087°53.727′ W (NAD 83). 

This proposed rule will be effective 

from August 1, 2015, until August 30, 

2015. Additionally, the Coast Guard 

anticipates that this safety zone will be 

enforced from 10:30 a.m. until 2:30 p.m. 

on August 7; from 6:30 a.m. until 4:30 

p.m. on August 8, and from 6:30 a.m. 

until 11:30 a.m. on August 9, 2015. This 

2015 enforcement schedule may change, 

and in the event of a change, the 

Captain of the Port Lake Michigan will 

issue a Notice of Enforcement with an 

updated enforcement schedule. 

The Captain of the Port Lake 

Michigan will notify the public that the 

zone in this proposal is or will be 

enforced by all appropriate means to the 

affected segments of the public 

including publication in the Federal 

Register as practicable, in accordance 

with 33 CFR 165.7(a). Such means of 

notification may also include, but are 

not limited to Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners or Local Notice to Mariners. 

All persons and vessels shall comply 

with the instructions of the Captain of 

the Port Lake Michigan or her 

designated on-scene representative. 

Entry into, transiting, or anchoring 

within the safety zone is prohibited 

unless authorized by the Captain of the 

Port Lake Michigan or her designated 

on-scene representative. The Captain of 

the Port Lake Michigan or her 

designated on-scene representative may 

be contacted via VHF Channel 16. 

E. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on these statutes and executive 

orders. 

1. Regulatory Planning and Review 

This proposed rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, and does not 

require an assessment of potential costs 

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that 

Order. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under that 

Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the 

regulatory policies and procedures of 

the Department of Homeland Security 

(DHS). We conclude that this proposed 

rule is not a significant regulatory action 

because we anticipate that it will have 

minimal impact on the economy, will 

not interfere with other agencies, will 

not adversely alter the budget of any 

grant or loan recipients, and will not 

raise any novel legal or policy issues. 

Overall, we expect the economic impact 

of this proposed rule to be minimal and 

that a full Regulatory Evaluation is 

unnecessary. 

2. Impact on Small Entities 

Under The Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. This proposed rule will affect 

the following entities, some of which 

might be small entities: The owners or 

operators of vessels intending to transit 

or anchor within the waters of the 

marina at Pier Wisconsin or Lakeshore 

inlet during the times in which the 

safety zone is enforced in August of 

2015. 

This proposed safety zone will not 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities 

for the following reasons: This proposed 

rule will be enforced for a limited time 

during the month of August; this 

proposed safety zone has been designed 

to allow traffic to pass safely around the 

zone whenever possible, and vessels 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 249 / Tuesday, December 30, 2014 / Proposed Rules 78371 

will be allowed to pass through the zone 

with the permission of the Captain of 

the Port. If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

3. Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule so that 

they can better evaluate its effects on 

them and participate in the rulemaking. 

If the rule would affect your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact Petty Officer 

Joseph McCollum, Prevention 

Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake 

Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at (414) 747– 

7148. The Coast Guard will not retaliate 

against small entities that question or 

complain about this proposed rule or 

any policy or action of the Coast Guard. 

4. Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520.). 

5. Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the national government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this proposed rule under that 

Order and have determined that it does 

not have implications for federalism. 

6. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places, or vessels. 

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule would not result in such 

expenditure, we do discuss the effects of 

this proposed rule elsewhere in this 

preamble. 

8. Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not cause a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

9. Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

10. Protection of Children From 

Environmental Health Risks 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This proposed rule is not an 

economically significant rule and would 

not create an environmental risk to 

health or risk to safety that might 

disproportionately affect children. 

11. Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

12. Energy Effects 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant energy action’’ under 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. An 

environmental analysis checklist 

supporting this determination is 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule 

involves the establishment of a safety 

zone and is therefore categorically 

excluded under figure 2–1, paragraph 

34(g) of the Instruction. We seek any 

comments or information that may lead 

to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this 

proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0751 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T09–0751 Safety Zone; Triathlon 

National Championships, Milwaukee 

Harbor, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 

(a) Location. The safety zone will 

encompass all waters of Milwaukee 

Harbor, including Lakeshore inlet and 

the marina at Pier Wisconsin, west of an 

imaginary line across the entrance to the 

Marina at Pier Wisconsin connecting 

coordinates 43°02.253′ N, 087°53.623′ W 

and 43°01.737′ N, 087°53.727′ W (NAD 

83). 

(b) Effective Period. This safety zone 

is effective from August 1, 2015, until 

August 30, 2015. The Coast Guard 

anticipates that this safety zone will be 

enforced from 10:30 a.m. until 2:30 p.m. 

on August 7; from 6:30 a.m. until 4:30 

p.m. on August 8, and from 6:30 a.m. 

until 11:30 a.m. on August 9, 2015. This 

2015 enforcement schedule may change, 

and in the event of a change, the 

Captain of the Port Lake Michigan will 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
78372 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 249 / Tuesday, December 30, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

issue a Notice of Enforcement with an 

updated enforcement schedule. 

(c) Regulations. 

(1) In accordance with the general 

regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry 

into, transiting, or anchoring in this 

safety zone is prohibited unless 

authorized by the Captain of the Port 

Lake Michigan or her designated onscene representative. 

(2) This safety zone is closed to all 

vessel traffic except as permitted by the 

Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her 

designated on-scene representative. 

(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of 

the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan 

is any Coast Guard commissioned, 

warrant, or petty officer who has been 

designated by the Captain of the Port 

Lake Michigan to act on her behalf. The 

Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her 

designated on-scene representative may 

be contacted via VHF Channel 16. 

(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter 

or operate within the safety zone shall 

contact the Captain of the Port Lake 

Michigan or her designated on-scene 

representative to obtain permission to 

do so. Vessel operators given permission 

to enter or operate in the safety zone 

must comply with all directions given to 

them by the Captain of the Port Lake 

Michigan or her on-scene 

representative. 

Dated: December 3, 2014. 

A.B. Cocanour, 

Captain, U. S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Lake Michigan. 

[FR Doc. 2014–30491 Filed 12–29–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R10–OAR–2013–0005; FRL–9920–97– 

Region 10] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Klamath Falls, 

Oregon Nonattainment Area; Fine 

Particulate Matter Emissions Inventory 

and SIP Strengthening Measures 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Oregon Department of 

Environmental Quality (ODEQ) 

submitted a revision to the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP), dated 

December 14, 2012, to address Clean Air 

Act (CAA or the Act) requirements for 

the Klamath Falls, Oregon 

nonattainment area for the 2006 24-hour 

fine particulate matter (PM2.5) national 

ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). 

The EPA proposes to approve the 

emissions inventory contained in the 

ODEQ’s submittal as meeting the 

requirement to submit a comprehensive, 

accurate, and current inventory of direct 

PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursor emissions in 

Klamath Falls, Oregon. The EPA also 

proposes to approve PM2.5 control 

measures contained in the December 

2012 submittal because incorporation of 

these measures will strengthen the 

Oregon SIP and reduce sources of PM2.5

emissions in the Klamath Falls, Oregon 

nonattainment area (Klamath Falls 

NAA) that contribute to violations of the 

2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before January 29, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10– 

OAR–2013–0005, by any of the 

following methods: 

• www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: R10-Public_Comments@

epa.gov. 

• Mail: Justin A. Spenillo, EPA 

Region 10, Office of Air, Waste and 

Toxics (AWT–150), 1200 Sixth Avenue, 

Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101. 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: EPA Region 

10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, 

Seattle, WA 98101. Attention: Justin A. 

Spenillo, Office of Air, Waste and 

Toxics, AWT–150. Such deliveries are 

only accepted during normal hours of 

operation, and special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R10–OAR–2013– 

0005. The EPA’s policy is that all 

comments received will be included in 

the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

the disclosure of which is restricted by 

statute. Do not submit information that 

you consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means the EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to the EPA without 

going through www.regulations.gov your 

email address will be automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the public 

docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, the EPA recommends that 

you include your name and other 

contact information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If the EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

the EPA may not be able to consider 

your comment. Electronic files should 

avoid the use of special characters, any 

form of encryption, and be free of any 

defects or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information, 

the disclosure of which is restricted by 

statute. Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy 

during normal business hours at the 

Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, EPA 

Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle 

WA, 98101. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Justin A. Spenillo at (206) 553–6125, 

spenillo.justin@epa.gov, or the above 

EPA, Region 10 address. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

the EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Background 

A. PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards 

B. Designation of PM2.5 Nonattainment 

Areas 

C. Submittal Requirements for PM2.5

Nonattainment Areas 

II. Analysis of the State’s Submittal 

A. Emissions Inventory 

B. Description of the Klamath County PM2.5

Control Measures 

III. Proposed Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Background 

A. PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards 

Under section 109 of the CAA, the 

EPA establishes NAAQS for certain 

pervasive air pollutants (referred to as 

‘‘criteria pollutants’’) and conducts 

periodic reviews of the NAAQS to 

determine whether they should be 

revised or whether new NAAQS should 

be established. After a new NAAQS is 

established or an existing NAAQS is 

revised, all areas across the country are 

evaluated to determine whether they 

meet the new or revised standard, and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS