alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2073 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Executive Office 

of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy, Other Federal 

Drug Control Programs for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug 

Control Policy, Other Federal Drug Control Programs 

for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2073 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, OF3 FICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY, 

4 OTHER FEDERAL DRUG CONTROL PROGRAMS 

5 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Executive Office of the President, Office of Na9 tional Drug Control Policy, Other Federal Drug Control 

10 Programs for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

11 $118,327,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Elissa Weiner, Respondent, v Richard Weiner, Defendant. Bernardino Esposito, Nonparty Appellant; Andrew L. Crabtree, P.C., Nonparty Respondent.

[966 NYS2d 895]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the nonparty Bernardino Esposito appeals from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Neary, J.), dated January 11, 2012, which denied his motion, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (4) to vacate so much of an order of the same court dated July 1, 2011, as directed the nonparty Andrew L. Crabtree, PC., to release and distribute certain escrow funds to the plaintiff and to the nonparty Andrew L. Crabtree, PC.

Ordered that the amended order dated January 11, 2012, is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, and the motion of *977the nonparty Bernardino Esposito, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (4) to vacate so much of the order dated July 1, 2011, as directed the nonparty Andrew L. Crabtree, PC., to release and distribute certain escrow funds is granted.

In this matrimonial action, which was commenced in 2003, the plaintiff moved, inter alia, for the release and distribution of funds held in escrow by the nonparty Andrew L. Crabtree, EC. (hereinafter Crabtree), in connection with the attempted sale of all the shares of Reniew Properties Corp. (hereinafter Reniew), a corporation partially owned by the defendant, to the nonparty appellant, Bernardino Esposito. In an order dated July 1, 2011, the Supreme Court, among other things, directed Crabtree to release the escrow funds and distribute the funds to the plaintiff and to Crabtree, as payment for Crabtree’s prior representation of the defendant and Reniew. The Supreme Court subsequently denied Esposito’s motion, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (4) to vacate that portion of the order dated July 1, 2011.

The Supreme Court erred in denying Esposito’s motion. *“A*court has no power to grant relief against an entity not named as a party and not properly summoned before the court” *(Riverside Capital Advisors, Inc. v First Secured Capital Corp., 28*AD3d 457, 460 [2006]; *see Flangos v Flangos,*82 AD3d 1037 [2011]). Here, since Esposito, a nonparty to this action, was not properly summoned before the court prior to the plaintiff seeking relief against him, the court had no power to award such relief *(see Flangos v Flangos,*82 AD3d 1037 [2011]; *Riverside Capital Advisors, Inc. v First Secured Capital Corp.,*28 AD3d 457 [2006]). Rivera, J.P., Leventhal, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ANN LANGFORD, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) Civil Action No. 2:14-00070-KD-M

)

HALE COUNTY, ALABAMA )

COMMISSION and )

ARTHUR CRAWFORD in his Individual )

and Official Capacity, )

)

Defendants.

1 )

 FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the verdict of the jury entered June 8, 2016 (doc. 75-1), it is 

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that JUDGMENT in the amount of $110,230.00 is 

entered in favor of Plaintiff Ann Langford and against Defendants Arthur Crawford in his 

official capacity and the Hale County Commission as damages for the violation of her pretermination procedural due process rights brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

In accordance with the order entered September 16, 2016, awarding attorney’s fees, costs 

and expenses, it is FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that JUDGMENT in 

the amount of $98,230.00 for attorney’s fees and $10,267.91 for costs and expenses, for a total of 

$108,497.91, is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants Arthur Crawford in his 

official capacity and the Hale County Commission, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. 

DONE and ORDERED this the 16th day of September 2016. 

 s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 1 Defendant Hale County, Alabama was dismissed on motion for summary judgment (Doc. 56).

Case 2:14-cv-00070-KD-M Document 99 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 1
#### Lilleth McIntosh, Appellant, v Winston McIntosh, Respondent.

[872 NYS2d 490]

In an action for the partition of real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Yablon, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated March 9, 2007, as, after a hearing, awarded her the sum of only $96,350 of the $218,000 profit from the sale of the property.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

A tenant in common “has the right to take and occupy the whole of the premises and preserve them from waste or injury, so long as he or she does not interfere with the right of [the other tenant] to also occupy the premises” *(Jemzura v Jemzura,*36 NY2d 496, 503 [1975]). Mere occupancy alone by one of the tenants does not make that tenant liable to the other tenant for use and occupancy absent an agreement to that effect or an ouster *(see Misk v Moss,*41 AD3d 672 [2007]; *Degliuomini v Degliuomini,*12 AD3d 634 [2004]). Here, the plaintiff failed to establish that she was ousted from the property. Accordingly, the Court Attorney Referee properly found that the defendant *815was entitled to a credit for one-half of the payments made for maintenance, upkeep, and repair of the premises, including mortgage and insurance *(see Kwang Hee Lee v Adjmi 936 Realty Assoc.,*34 AD3d 646 [2006]; *Corsa v Biernacki,*2 AD3d 388 [2003]), and the plaintiff was entitled to one half of the *amount*of rent the defendant received *(see Degliuomini v Degliuomini,*12 AD3d 634 [2004]).

The plaintiff is not entitled to a new hearing based on the alleged untimeliness of the Court Attorney Referee’s decision, as the plaintiff never sought a new hearing on this ground prior to the filing of the decision *(see*CPLR 4319; *Cooper v Cooper,*52 AD3d 429 [2008]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, PJ., Spolzino, McCarthy and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1899 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1899

 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Joint Items, 
 Office of Congressional Accessibility Services, Salaries and Expenses 
                         for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Joint Items, 
 Office of Congressional Accessibility Services, Salaries and Expenses 
                         for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR JOINT ITEMS, OFFICE 
              OF CONGRESSIONAL ACCESSIBILITY SERVICES, SALARIES AND 
              EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Joint Items, Office of 
Congressional Accessibility Services, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal 
year 2024 may not exceed $1,486,000.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

HENRY JOINER, :

 :

Plaintiff, :

 :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 05-0538-BH-M

 :

CITY OF GREENSBORO, ALABAMA, :

et al., :

 :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this

file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been

no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED

as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be

and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to

prosecute and to obey the Court's Order.

DONE this 7th day of August, 2006.

s/ W. B. Hand 

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00538-BH-M Document 17 Filed 08/07/06 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2149 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2149

 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
  Agencies, Small Business Administration, Disaster Loan Program for 
                           fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
  Agencies, Small Business Administration, Disaster Loan Program for 
                           fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR INDEPENDENT 
              AGENCIES, SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, DISASTER LOAN 
              PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Independent Agencies, 
Small Business Administration, Disaster Loan Program for fiscal year 
2024 may not exceed $10,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

RAMON LORENZO MEDINA-COTA,

a.k.a. Ramon Medina-Cota,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-10333 & 08-10334

D.C. Nos. 4:01-cr-01796-RCC 

 4:06-cr-01718-RCC 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 10, 2011** 

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Ramon Lorenzo Medina-Cota appeals from

his guilty-plea conviction and 75-month sentence for illegal re-entry after

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and from his revocation of supervised

FILED

JAN 20 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-10333 & 08-10334

release and 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Medina-Cota’s counsel has filed a brief stating

there are no grounds for relief. We have provided the appellant with the

opportunity to file a supplemental brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, the district court’s judgments are AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.2   Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15(d)-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Kelli Turner

Principal Financial Officer
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Stonewin Capital, LP 

Under Contract No. SPE605-18-D-9414 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 62015 

Scott M. Heimberg, Esq. 

Amanda 8. Lowe, Esq. 

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP 

Washington, DC 

Daniel K. Poling, Esq. 

DLA Chief Trial Attorney 

Howard M. Kaufer, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

DLA Energy 

Fort Belvoir, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

By letter dated April 1, 2019, prior to the government filing an answer, appellant 

notified the Board that it wished to withdraw this appeal without prejudice. The 

government does not object to appellant's request. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed 

from the Board's docket without prejudice. 

Dated: April 8, 2019 

ministrative Judge 

Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62015, Appeal of Stonewin Capital, LP, 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2161 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. Department 

of Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service, North American Wetlands 

Conservation Fund for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. 

Department of Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service, 

North American Wetlands Conservation Fund for fiscal 

year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2161 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, US FISH 

3 AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, NORTH AMERICAN 

4 WETLANDS CONSERVATION FUND FOR FIS5 CAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for U.S. Department of Interior, US Fish and Wild9 life Service, North American Wetlands Conservation Fund 

10 for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $42,000,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>


                         TANGIBLE ASSET GALLERIES, INC.

                        2002 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Tangible Asset Galleries, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Silvano DiGenova, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                       /s/ Silvano DiGenova
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Silvano DiGenova, Chief Executive Officer
                                       February 13, 2003



         This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

VICKIE TAYLOR )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No.: 04-758-BH-B

)

THE CITY OF DEMOPOLIS, et al. )

)

Defendants )

JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order entered this day, granting Defendants’ Motion (Doc. 46) for Summary

Judgment, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that JUDGMENT be entered in favor

of the Defendants, The City of Demopolis, Cecil Williamson, Jack Cooley, Charles E. Jones, Woody

Collins, Melvin Yelverton and Thomas Moore and against the Plaintiff, Vickie Taylor, the Plaintiff

to have and recover nothing of the Defendant. 

SO ORDERED this 6th day of December, 2005

s/ W. B. Hand

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00758-BH-B Document 75 Filed 12/06/05 Page 1 of 1
#### Nancy Pastore, Appellant, v Western Beef, Inc., Respondent.

[972 NYS2d 703]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), entered March 19, 2012, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A defendant moving for summary judgment in a slip-and-fall case has the burden of establishing, prima facie, that it neither created the alleged hazardous condition nor had actual or constructive notice of its existence for a sufficient length of time to discover and remedy it *(see Petersel v Good Samaritan Hosp. of Suffern, N.Y.,*99 AD3d 880, 880 [2012]; *Johnson v Culinary Inst. of Am.,*95 AD3d 1077, 1078 [2012]; *Perez v New York City Hous. Auth., lit*AD3d 629, 630 [2010]; *Edwards v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.,*71 AD3d 721, 721 [2010]). “To meet its initial burden on the issue of lack of constructive notice, the defendant must offer some evidence as to when the area in question was last cleaned or inspected relative to the time when the plaintiff fell” *(Birnbaum v New York Racing Assn., Inc.,*57 AD3d 598, 598-599 [2008]; *see Petersel v Good Samaritan Hosp. of Suffern,*
      *861
      *N.Y.,*99 AD3d at 880; *Johnson v Culinary Inst. of Am.,*95 AD3d at 1078; *Schiano v Mijul, Inc.,*79 AD3d 726, 726-727 [2010]; *Farrell v Waldbaum’s, Inc.,*73 AD3d 846, 847 [2010]; *Ames v Waldbaum, Inc.,*34 AD3d 607, 607 [2006]).

Here, in support of its motion, the defendant store owner demonstrated its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence establishing that it did not create the condition that caused the plaintiff to fall in its store or have notice thereof *(see Ingram v Long Is. Coll. Hosp.,*101 AD3d 814, 815 [2012]; *Cerniglia v Loza Rest. Corp.,*98 AD3d 933, 934 [2012]; *Knack v Red Lobster 286, N & D Rests., Inc.,*98 AD3d 473, 473-474 [2012]; *Pollina v Oakland’s Rest., Inc.,*95 AD3d 1190, 1191 [2012]; *Cusack v Peter Luger, Inc., 77*AD3d 785, 786 [2010]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Hall and Miller, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6349
SCOTLAND E. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FRANK SIZER, Commissioner; LEHRMAN DOTSON, Warden; KAREN GIBSON, Mail Clerk, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:06-cv01759-AMD) Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 25, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scotland E. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip Michael Pickus, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Scotland E. Williams appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Sizer , No. 1:06-cv-01759-AMD (D. Md. Aug. 10, 2007; Feb. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED