alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1954 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1954

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration 
Health Workforce, Construction and Capital Improvement Costs for Fiscal 
                               Year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration 
Health Workforce, Construction and Capital Improvement Costs for Fiscal 
                               Year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 
              AND HUMAN SERVICES, HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES 
              ADMINISTRATION HEALTH WORKFORCE, CONSTRUCTION AND CAPITAL 
              IMPROVEMENT COSTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Health and 
Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration Health 
Workforce, Construction and Capital Improvement Costs for fiscal year 
2024 may not exceed $1,096,695,000.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm**

 

 

The Board of Directors

Chemtura Corporation:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements (Nos. 33-21246, 33-42280, 33-67600, 333-62429, 333-60422, 333-87035,333-71030, 333-71032, 333-87886, 333-123857, 333-126341, and 333-136217) onForm S-8 and registration statements (Nos. 333-123857, 333-119641, 333-35678,and 333-83901) on Form S-4 of Chemtura Corporation (the “Company”) of ourreports, dated March 8, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheetsof Chemtura Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, andthe related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, andcash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,2006, and the related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting asof December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Chemtura Corporation.

 

Our report dated March 8, 2007 on the consolidated financial statementsincludes an explanatory paragraph which states that as discussed in Note 1 tothe consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions ofStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “*Share-BasedPayment*” and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “*Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements in Current YearFinancial Statements*” as of January 1, 2006 and Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards No. 158, “*Employers’ Accounting forDefined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans*” as ofDecember 31, 2006.  

 

Our report dated March 8, 2007, on management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2006, expresses our opinion that the Company did not maintain effectiveinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 because ofthe effect of a material weakness on the achievement of the objectives of the controlcriteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the followingmaterial weakness has been identified: The Company did not maintain adequateresources in its accounting and tax functions; therefore, management’soversight and review related to certain accounts and analyses was not timely oreffective.  This deficiency resulted inmaterial misstatements in the Company’s preliminary 2006 income tax and patentand trademark accounts.

 

/s/  KPMG LLP

 

Stamford, Connecticut

March 8, 2007

 

----
Exhibit 10.1


 



 


First Amendment to the

Amended and Restated Director Deferred

 Compensation Master Agreement


This FIRST AMENDMENT is entered into this 21st day of July, 2015, but effective the 1st day of January, 2009, and amends the Amended and Restated Director Deferred Compensation Master Agreement (the “Director Plan”).  It is entered into by River Valley Financial Bank (the “Bank”) and the five directors of the Bank currently participating in the Director Plan.


WHEREAS, Section XII of the Director Plan provides that the Director Plan may be amended upon mutual written consent of the Bank and the Directors participating in the Director Plan; and


WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Director Plan for the purpose of changing the Interest Factor;


NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the Bank and the undersigned Directors as follows:


Section 1.16 of the Director Plan shall be amended and replaced as follows:


“1.16 “Interest Factor” means for each calendar year the average five year return on equity of the Bank for the five preceding calendar years, not to exceed ten percent (10%).”


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment effective as of the date indicated above.


	
DIRECTORS:

	 	
BANK:


	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
RIVER VALLEY FINANCIAL BANK


	
/s/ Mathew P. Forrester

	 	 	 
	
MATTHEW FORRESTER

	 	
By:

	
/s/ Matthew P. Forrester


	 	 	
Title:

	
President and Chief Executive Officer


	
/s/ Michael Hensley

	 	 	 
	
MICHAEL HENSLEY

	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
/s/ Charles McKay

	 	 	 
	
CHARLES MCKAY

	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
/s/ Lonnie Collins

	 	 	 
	
LONNIE COLLINS

	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
/s/ Fred W. Koehler

	 	 	 
	
FRED W. KOEHLER
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT 
TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In condition with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, George G. Usher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

By /s/ George G. UsherGeorge G. Usher, 
Chief Executive Officer
June 15, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

P a g e | 18

---
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of WorldTeq Group International, Inc. (the"Company"),
on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report"), I, Jeffrey Lieberman, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C.
Se ction 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 1.
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
    To
      my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairlypresents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition andresults
      of operations of the Company as of and for the period coveredby
      the Report.
 
 
 
 /s/
Jeffrey Lieberman
 Jeffrey
Lieberman
 Chief
Executive Officer,
 President,
Treasurer and Chairman of the Board
 
 Date:
April 14, 2004
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, John D. Goodman, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
January 23, 2009



/s/    JOHN D.
GOODMANJohn D. GoodmanChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2





Certification Pursuant To


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant To


Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002








In connection with the Yearly Report Amendment of China Yida Holding, Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Yongxi Lin, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results of operations of the Company.







/s/  Yongxi Lin


Yongxi Lin


Chief Financial Officer





Dated: December 19, 2012
#### In the Matter of Adrian Golding, Petitioner, v Juan M. Merchan et al., Respondents.

[964 NYS2d 56]

—The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Fractice Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Concur—Andrias, J.E, Saxe, DeGrasse, Richter and Gische, JJ.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

JOSEPH REMBERT, )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION: 14-00503-KD-B

 ) 

SELMA CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, )

Defendant. )

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order issued on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED

and DECREED that JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the Defendant Selma City Board of 

Education, and against the Plaintiff Joseph Rembert.

DONE and ORDERED this the 25th day of September 2015.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:14-cv-00503-KD-B Document 72 Filed 09/25/15 Page 1 of 1
#### DISCOVERY LICENSING, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. KING’S INTERNATIONAL MULTIMEDIA COMPANY, LIMITED, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-2280.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 10, 2007.

Decided: Dec. 27, 2007.

Philip F. Hudoek, Reston, Virginia; James C.T. Hsia, McLean, Virginia, for Appellant. Savalle C. Sims, Ross Q. Panko, Arent Fox LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

King’s International Multimedia Co., Ltd. (“King’s”), appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment and awarding damages and injunctive relief in favor of Discovery Licensing, Inc. (“Discovery”), in this breach of contract action. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error in the court’s decision to grant summary judgment in Discovery’s favor. To the extent King’s contends that the affidavits submitted by Discovery in support of its summary judgment motion did not comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e), we find that King’s has waived its challenge by failing to file a motion to strike the affidavits in the district court. *Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.,*69 F.3d 712, 718 (4th Cir.1995). We also find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of King’s’ request to extend discovery pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f), *see Ingle v. Yelton,*439 F.3d 191, 195 (4th Cir.2006) (stating standard of review), or in the court’s refusal to appoint a special master, *see Meeropol v. Meese,*790 F.2d 942, 961 (D.C.Cir.1986) (stating standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court at the summary judgment hearing held on October 30, 2006, and in its subsequent written order. *Discovery Licensing, Inc. v. King’s Int’l Multimedia Co., Ltd.,*No. 8:04-cv-04055-RWT (D. Md. filed Nov. 1, 2006 & entered Nov. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Geza Eichhorn, Respondent, v. “John” Olshansky, First Name of Tenant Being Fictitious, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

December 15, 1924.

Summary proceedings to dispossess — evidence — warranty by landlord’s grantors of amount of rent not admissible against tenant.

In summary proceedings to dispossess, evidence of a warranty by the landlord's grantors of the amount of rent is not competent evidence against the tenant.

Appeal by tenant from a final order in summary proceedings in the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Sixth District, awarding possession of the premises to the landlord.

*Leo Schafran [Irving L. Rollins*of counsel], for the appellant.

*Geza Eichhorn,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam:

The warranty by the landlord’s grantors that the rent of this tenant s thirty-four dollars is not competent evidence against this tenant.

Final order reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Bijur, Wagner and Levy, JJ.
SCWC-17-0000233

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

ROBERT A. BUKOSKI,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-17-0000233; CASE NO. 5DTA-16-00016)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s application for writ

of certiorari, filed on April 27, 2018, is hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 13, 2018.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-17-0000233

13-JUN-2018

08:17 AM
Exhibit 32.1

BULOVA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I John D Stanton, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John D. StantonJohn D. StantonPrincipal Executive Officer
June 1, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TONY CURTIS BROACH, #136351, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 15-42-KD-C

KIM THOMAS, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

Previously, the Order and Judgment entered March 6, 2015 were vacated on 

basis that Plaintiff Tony Curtis Broach had not received a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and therefore, had no opportunity to file any objection (docs. 5-8). 

Copies of the Order vacating the Order and Judgment and the Report and 

Recommendation were mailed to Broach on April 7, 2015 (doc. 8). Broach was directed 

to file any objection within the time frame set forth in the Report and Recommendation 

(Id). Objections were due on April 27, 2015. To date, no objection has been received. 

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to 

the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. 3) made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is 

ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED

without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

DONE this the 8th day of May 2015.

s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:15-cv-00042-KD-C Document 9 Filed 05/08/15 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jadair Newkirk, Appellant.

[825 NYS2d 379]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered May 12, 2005, convicting him of criminal possession óf a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Miller, J.P., Krausman, Spolzino, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD HOLLINGSWORTH, *

*

 Plaintiff, *

*

vs. * CIVIL ACTION NO.13-00480-WS-B

*

KIM T. THOMAS, et al., *

*

 Defendant. *

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be 

dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the 

Court’s order and to prosecute this action.

DONE this 16th of September, 2016.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00480-WS-B Document 32 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


      CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James D. Tilton, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual
report on Form 10-K of Phoenix Interests, Inc. for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Phoenix Interests, Inc.


Dated: May 6, 2009                      By: /s/ James D. Tilton, Jr.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            James D. Tilton, Jr.
                                            Chief Executive Officer
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

[Avalanche Biotechnologies, Inc. letterhead] 

August 11, 2015 
 Hans P. Hull, Esq. 

1035 O’Brien Drive 
 Suite A 

Menlo Park, California 94025 
 Re: Special Interim CEO
Compensation 
 Dear Hans: 
 Pursuant to your Special
Bonus letter, dated July 23, 2015, you were notified of the Special Bonus of $120,000 payable to you within ten (10) business days of the date of commencement of employment of a permanent Chief Executive Officer of Avalanche
Biotechnologies, Inc. (the “Company”), subject to your continued employment through such date. The Board of Directors of the Company has modified the payment schedule for your Special Bonus. Subject to your continued employment on the
payment dates, you will be paid $10,000 per month, beginning August 15, 2015, up to a maximum of $120,000. In the event a permanent Chief Executive Officer commences employment prior to full payment of the Special Bonus, you will be paid any
unpaid portion of the Special Bonus in a lump sum within ten (10) business days of the date of commencement of employment of the permanent Chief Executive Officer. 

In addition to the Special Bonus, effective August 15, 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company has determined to increase your annual base salary to
$360,000 per year. 
 We greatly appreciate your services to the Company during this transition time. 

 

	
	Sincerely,
	
	 /s/ Mark S. Blumenkranz
  

Mark S. Blumenkranz, M.D.
 Chairman of the Board
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2314 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of State, 

International Commissions, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of State, International Commissions, Salaries 

and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 DEPARTMENT OF STATE, INTERNATIONAL 

5 COMMISSIONS, SALARIES AND EXPENSES 

6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Department of State, International Commissions, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2314 IH

1 Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $48,134,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Beverly A. Fisher, as President of Association of Greece Central Educational Professionals, Respondent, v Greece Central School District, Appellant.

[825 NYS2d 405]

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the *1204Supreme Court, Monroe County (Evelyn Frazee, J.), entered January 3, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75. The order and judgment, among other things, compelled respondent to arbitration with petitioner pursuant to CPLR 7503.

It is hereby ordered that the order and judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decisions at Supreme Court. Present—Scudder, PJ., Martoche, Centra and Green, JJ.