alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joan C. DAUGHETY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pete GEREN, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Army; Michael Stewart, Colonel; John Ives, Installation Commander, Defendants-Appellees. The Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association, Amicus Supporting Appellant.

No. 07-1337.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 12, 2007.

Decided: Dec. 28, 2007.

Joel P. Bennett, Law Offices of Joel P. Bennett, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Stephen Z. Chertkof, Heller, Huron, Chertkof, Lerner, Simon & Salzman, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Supporting Appellant.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

*548Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joan C. Daughety appeals the magistrate judge’s * order granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on her discriminatory discharge claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). *See Daughety v. Geren,*No. 8:04-cv-02114-CBD (D. Md. filed March 20, 2006; entered March 21, 2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. The jury’s finding that the Defendant’s proffered non-discriminatory reasons motivated its progressive discipline of Daughety-precludes Daughety’s appellate challenge of discriminatory discharge. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the magistrate judge. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
#### Bettie J. LITTLE, Diedre M. Goodwin, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COBB COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-12626

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Oct. 31, 2006.

A. Lee Parks, Jr., Parks, Chesin *&*Wal-bert, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

*994Benton J. Mathis, Jr., Amy M. Combs, Freeman Mathis & Gary, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before WILSON, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The summary judgment granted in favor of Cobb County is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the ORDER of the United States District Judge entered March 30, 2006, and so much of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as is adopted therein.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit10.1




Exhibit 10.1

May 20, 2015
Michael D. Fricklas
c/o Viacom Inc.
1515 Broadway
New York, NY  10036
Dear Mr. Fricklas:
Reference is made to your employment agreement with Viacom Inc. (the “Company”), dated October 2, 2009, amended as of August 6, 2012 (together, the “Employment Agreement”).  All defined terms used without definition shall have the meanings provided in your Employment Agreement.  
This letter, when fully executed below, shall amend the Employment Agreement as follows:
1.    Contract Period.  Paragraph 1 shall be amended to change the date representing the expiration of the Contract Period from “June 30, 2016” to “June 30, 2018.” 
If the foregoing correctly sets forth our understanding, please sign, date and return both copies of this letter agreement to the undersigned for execution on behalf of the Company; after this letter agreement has been executed by the Company, it shall constitute a binding amendment to your Employment Agreement.
	
					
	 
	 
	Very truly yours,

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	VIACOM INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	By:
	/s/ Scott Mills

	 
	 
	 
	Scott Mills

	 
	 
	 
	Executive Vice President,

	 
	 
	 
	Chief Administrative Officer

	 
	 
	 
	 

	ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Michael D. Fricklas
	 
	 
	 

	Michael D. Fricklas
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Dated:
	5/29/2015
Exhibit
32(e)


CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


FOR PPL
ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,
2009





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Electric Utilities
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered
Report"), I, the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, hereby certify that:





·
            The
      Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and·
            The
      information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.











Date:  May
      1, 2009
            /s/  David
      G. DeCampliDavid
      G. DeCampli
              President
              PPL
      Electric Utilities Corporation








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1797 

AN ACT 

To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to 

promulgate a consumer product safety standard with respect to rechargeable lithium-ion batteries used in micromobility devices, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1797 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Setting Consumer 

3 Standards for Lithium-Ion Batteries Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY STANDARD FOR CER5 TAIN BATTERIES. 

6 (a) CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY STANDARD RE7 QUIRED.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Consumer 

10 Product Safety Commission shall promulgate, under 

11 section 553 of title 5, United States Code, a final 

12 consumer product safety standard for rechargeable 

13 lithium-ion batteries used in micromobility devices, 

14 including electric bicycles and electric scooters, to 

15 protect against the risk of fires caused by such bat16 teries. 

17 (2) INCLUSION OF RELATED EQUIPMENT.—The 

18 standard promulgated under paragraph (1) shall in19 clude requirements with respect to equipment related 

20 to or used with rechargeable lithium-ion batteries 

21 used in micromobility devices, including battery 

22 chargers, charging cables, external terminals on bat23 tery packs, external terminals on micromobility de24 vices, and free-standing stations used for recharging. 

25 (b) CPSC DETERMINATION OF SCOPE.—In promul26 gating the standard under subsection (a), the Commission 
3 

•HR 1797 EH

1 shall determine the types of products subject to the stand2 ard and shall ensure that such products are— 

3 (1) within the jurisdiction of the Commission; 

4 and 

5 (2) reasonably necessary to include to protect 

6 against the risk of fires. 

7 (c) MODIFICATIONS.—At any time after the promul8 gation of the standard under subsection (a), the Commis9 sion may, through a rulemaking under section 553 of title 

10 5, United States Code, modify the requirements of the 

11 standard. 

12 (d) TREATMENT OF STANDARD.—A standard pro13 mulgated under this section, including a modification of 

14 such standard, shall be treated as a consumer product 

15 safety rule promulgated under section 9 of the Consumer 

16 Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2058). 

Passed the House of Representatives May 15, 2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1797 

AN ACT 

To require the Consumer Product Safety Commisother purposes. batteries used in micromobility devices, and for standard with respect to rechargeable lithium-ion sion to promulgate a consumer product safety
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of Mandalay Media, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does
      hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 of the
      Company (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information
      contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November
      14, 2008




/s/
                Bruce SteinBruce
                SteinChief
                Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and shall be furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Jeffrey S. Ward, Chief Financial Officerof Anchor Pacific Underwriters, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                       |

Dated:   November 21, 2002

 

|   | /s/   Jeffrey S. Ward         |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|        |                                         |
|   | Jeffrey S. Ward Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 12
 
 Third Quarter
    
    
    First Nine Months2010
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2010
    
    
    2009Computation of Earnings:Income before income taxes
    
    $
    24,821
    
    
    $
    17,430
    
    
    $
    54,686
    
    
    $
    50,056Add:Interest expense
    
    
    8,259
    
    
    
    8,289
    
    
    
    24,721
    
    
    
    26,332Amortization of debt premium/discount and expenses
    
    
    590
    
    
    
    593
    
    
    
    1,760
    
    
    
    1,811Interest portion of rent expense
    
    
    411
    
    
    
    391
    
    
    
    1,238
    
    
    
    1,116Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    34,081
    
    
    $
    26,703
    
    
    $
    82,405
    
    
    $
    79,315Computation of Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    8,259
    
    
    $
    8,289
    
    
    $
    24,721
    
    
    $
    26,332Capitalized interest
    
    
    8
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    85
    
    
    
    64Amortization of debt premium/discount and expenses
    
    
    590
    
    
    
    593
    
    
    
    1,760
    
    
    
    1,811Interest portion of rent expense
    
    
    411
    
    
    
    391
    
    
    
    1,238
    
    
    
    1,116Fixed charges
    
    $
    9,268
    
    
    $
    9,286
    
    
    $
    27,804
    
    
    $
    29,323Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    3.68
    
    
    
    2.88
    
    
    
    2.96
    
    
    
    2.70
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Deshawn Wilson, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 886]

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Ricigliano, J.), rendered July 5, 2012, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty (Reilly, J.), and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s plea of guilty was entered voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently *(see People v Fiumefreddo,*82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; *People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]; *People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9, 17 [1983]).

The defendant received the effective assistance of counsel *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 146-147 [1981]). Mastro, J.P., Balkin, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 23.1




                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
Number 333-93933, 333-111037, 333-105425, and 333-105424 of Civitas BankGroup,
Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Number 333-107352 of Civitas
BankGroup, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated March 5, 2004, incorporated by
reference in this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Civitas
BankGroup, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.




                                       /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

Brentwood, Tennessee
December 17, 2004
#### Kymberly Higgins-Barber, Plaintiff, v Raffles International et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Quality Enclosures, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[826 NYS2d 238]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane S. Solomon, J.), entered April 6, 2006, which granted the motion by third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Third-party defendant made an uncontroverted showing that it neither installed nor maintained the shower door or its component parts, including the roller assembly. The sole submission by third-party plaintiffs in opposition was the affidavit of the construction manager during the renovation of the hotel in the mid-1990s, when the shower door was purportedly installed. This failed to raise an issue of fact as to whether perceived defects years earlier had contributed in any way to the occurrence of the alleged accident *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sullivan, Nardelli, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 50438 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. GREGORIO GARCIA, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:18

- CR

- 485

- 1

Before KING, GRAVES, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Gregorio Garcia, Jr. appeals his bench

- trial conviction for conspiracy to transport illegal aliens

. On appeal, he contends that the evidence was insufficient for conviction because there was no evidence of an agreement between himself and any other individual to transport the illegal aliens. In reviewing a bench

- trial conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government and defer to reasonable inferences drawn

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 4, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-50438 Document: 00515331477 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2020No. 19

- 50438

2 by the district court. United States v. Esparza , 678 F.3d 389, 392 (5th Cir. 2012). The focus of our review is on “whether the f inding of guilt is supported by substantial evidence, i.e., evidence sufficient to justify the trial judge, as the trier of fact, in concluding beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.” Id. (internal quotations marks and citation omitted). Here, there was sufficient evidence in the record to establish that Garcia came to an agreement with one or more people regarding the transportation of illegal aliens. See id. Garcia drove in tandem with the black Camaro driven by Monica Benavidez on Fe bruary 20, 2018; both vehicles were registered to “A. Benavidez” ; Garcia stated that the white F

- 150 pickup truck was given to him by Benavidez; and the cell phone found in the F

- 150 appeared to belong to Benavidez. Garcia performed several U

- turns on Far m
- to

- Market Road 117 while driving, as though he were looking for something or someone, and two of the illegal aliens were told by relatives or people involved in the smuggling operation that they would be picked up on February 20 on FM 117 by an older whi te truck. AFFIRMED. Case: 19-50438 Document: 00515331477 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/04/2020
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2188 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Environmental 

Protection Agency, Science and Technology for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Environmental Protection Agency, Science and Technology 

for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 

5 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR FISCAL 

6 YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Environmental Protection Agency, Science and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2188 IH

1 Technology for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $717,723,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5


<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                             30,983
<SECURITIES>                       210,000
<RECEIVABLES>                      712,075
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        173,044
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   1,674,231
<PP&E>                             249,500
<DEPRECIATION>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     12,692,978
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              7,444,842
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                           11,861
<OTHER-SE>                         1,887,498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       12,692,978
<SALES>                            4,960,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   4,782,000
<CGS>                              4,326,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      911,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (454,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (454,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       (454,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                        (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (.06)



</TABLE>
EX-10.22



 Exhibit 10.22 

Director Compensation Plan 
 In accordance with
the Potbelly Corporation 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), each non-employee Director of Potbelly Corporation (the “Company”) and Potbelly Illinois, Inc. is eligible to receive compensation for services rendered. Each
non-employee/non-investor Director who is a member of the Board of Directors as of the end of the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) is eligible to receive $80,000 in annual compensation, and each
non-employee/investor Director who is a member of the Board of Directors as of the Annual Meeting is eligible to receive $40,000 in annual compensation. 

Each non-employee/non-investor Director may elect between the following forms of payment for his or her annual compensation: 

 

	 	1.	The non-employee/non-investor Director receives Restricted Stock Units (as defined in the Plan) (the “RSUs”) having a grant date Fair Market Value of $80,000 (with a grant date on or before the end of the
second fiscal quarter); or 

  

	 	2.	The non-employee/non-investor Director receives: 

  

	 	a.	$40,000 in cash (half of which will be paid on before the end of the second fiscal quarter and half of which will be paid on or before the end of the fiscal year); plus 


 

	 	b.	RSUs having a grant date Fair Market Value of $40,000 (with a grant date on or before the end of the second fiscal quarter). 


If any non-employee/non-investor Director fails to make an election prior to the end of the first fiscal quarter, such Director will be deemed
to have elected to receive $40,000 in cash plus RSUs having a grant date Fair Market Value of $40,000. 
 If any non-employee/non-investor
Director joins the Board of Directors of the Company and/or Potbelly Illinois, Inc. after the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”), such Director’s compensation shall be pro-rated accordingly and paid prior to the
next Annual Meeting. 
 Each non-employee/investor Director is eligible to receive his or her annual compensation as RSUs having a grant
date Fair Market Value of $40,000 (with a grant date on or before the end of the second fiscal quarter). 
 Subject to the terms and conditions of the
Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, RSUs shall vest as follows: fifty percent (50%) on the first anniversary of the grant date, and fifty percent (50%) on the second anniversary of the grant date.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2228 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, 

National Capital Planning Commission, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal 

year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, National Capital Planning Commission, 

Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 RELATED AGENCIES, NATIONAL CAPITAL 

5 PLANNING COMMISSION, SALARIES AND EX6 PENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Related Agencies, National Capital Planning 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2228 IH

1 Commission, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 

2 may not exceed $8,099,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB