alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         3,759,454
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         4,801,005
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    594,794
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         594,794
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           594,794
<LOANS>                                        74,396,675
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,325,134
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 95,156,437
<DEPOSITS>                                     87,163,187
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            796,099
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       591,544
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,605,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 95,156,437
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                3,912,521
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              24,403
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               127,329
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               4,064,253
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1,910,174
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,910,174
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2,154,079
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  273,110
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2,454,492
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                715,229
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     715,229
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   442,929
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.66
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 10.50
<LOANS-NON>                                    795,824
<LOANS-PAST>                                   860,484
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,090,730
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  47,152
<RECOVERIES>                                   8,446
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,325,134
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,325,134
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        542,596
        


</TABLE>
MMSI-06.30.2015-10Q-Ex 10.2






EXHIBIT 10.2
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO 
THE MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., 1996 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., 1996 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (this “Amendment”) is hereby adopted effective February 13, 2015 by Merit Medical Systems, Inc., a Utah corporation (the “Company”), contingent upon approval of this Amendment by the shareholders of the Company not later than June 30, 2015.


WHEREAS, the Company has adopted and currently maintains the Merit Medical Systems, Inc., 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of its employees and other permitted participants; and
    
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to amend the Plan for the purpose of extending the term of the Plan until the last business day of June 2026.
 
NOW, THEREFORE, subject to approval of the Company’s shareholders prior to June 30, 2015, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of February 13, 2015:


1.  Amendment to the Plan.  Section 4.1 of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:


4.1    Offerings.  The Plan will be implemented by quarterly offerings of Common Stock beginning on the first business day of July, October, January and April each year and continuing to the last business day of the calendar quarter in which the Offering commenced.  Each such quarterly offering is referred to in the Plan as an “Offering.”  The last quarterly Offering under the Plan shall expire on the last business day of June 2026 unless the Plan is extended by amendment prior to that date.  Subject to Section 10.1 below, the maximum number of shares that may be issued in any Offering shall be 12,250 shares, plus unissued shares carried over from all prior Offerings under the Plan to the extent the number of shares issued in such prior Offerings was less than the maximum number of shares that could have been offered and issued in such Offerings.    


2.    Effective Date.  This amendment shall be effective as of February 13, 2015 and shall apply to all Offerings under the Plan conducted subsequent to June 30, 2015.


3.    Ratification.  In all respects, other than as specifically set forth in Section 1 above, the Plan shall remain unaffected by this Amendment, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect, subject to the terms and conditions thereof, and in the event of any conflict, inconsistency, or incongruity between the provisions of this Amendment and any provisions of the Plan the provisions of this Amendment shall in all respects govern and control.


IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer effective as of February 13, 2015, contingent upon approval of this Amendment by the shareholders of the Company not later than June 30, 2015.


MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.


By: /s/ Rashelle Perry            
Its: Chief Legal Officer
Name: Rashelle Perry
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MELISSA ANNE CARNEY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0497-CG-B

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant 

to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is 

ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion 

to Dismiss is GRANTED, and this action is dismissed without prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED this 24th day of February, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00497-CG-B Document 17 Filed 02/24/15 Page 1 of 1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2229 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, 

Presidio Trust for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for 

Related Agencies, Presidio Trust for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 RELATED AGENCIES, PRESIDIO TRUST FOR 

5 FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Related Agencies, Presidio Trust for fiscal year 

9 2024 may not exceed $0. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### ATLANTA FIXTURE & SALES COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff, v. BITUMINOUS FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Pacific Indemnity Company, Security Insurance Company, Hardware Mutual Insurance Company of the Carolinas, and Phoenix of Hartford, Defendants.

Civ. A. No. 13171.

United States District Court, N. D. Georgia, Atlanta Division.

Dec. 30, 1970.

*312Arnall, Golden & Gregory, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff.

Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Atlanta, Ga., for Bituminous Fire & Marine Ins. Co., Pacific Indemnity Co., and Security Ins. Co.

Neely, Freeman & Hawkins, Atlanta, Ga., for Hardware Mutual Ins. Co. and Phoenix of Hartford.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATOR

MOYE, District Judge.

Plaintiff has answered defendants third interrogatories by offering defendants the opportunity, pursuant to Rule 33(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to examine, audit or inspect plaintiff’s records said to contain the information from which the answers to plaintiff’s interrogatories may be derived.

The Court construes plaintiff’s response as representing that plaintiff does not have available the answers to said interrogatories, or any part of said answers, apart from the proffered records which constitute the raw material from which said answers may be derived. It is permissible for a party to extend the offer of inspection contemplated by Rule 33(c) without previously having objected to the burdensomeness of the interrogatories where “the burden of deriving or ascertaining the answer is substantially the same for the party serving the interrogatory as for the party served”.

If the only source of the answers to the interrogatories is the raw materials specified by plaintiff and which defendants may examine, audit or inspect, then the requirements of Rule 33(c) appear now to be satisfied. However, if it should appear during the course of the proceeding, that this is not the case and plaintiff does, in fact, have available in more convenient form the answers to the defendants’ third interrogatories, in whole or in part, then defendant may move for an appropriate order under Rule 37(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as for a failure to serve answers to interrogatories after proper service of said interrogatories.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2024 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 

Education, English Language Assistance for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Education, English Language Assistance for 

fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ENGLISH LAN5 GUAGE ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:11 Apr 15, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2024.IH H2024

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2024 IH

1 able for Department of Education, English Language As2 sistance for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $0. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 USC § 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Jiangbo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“the
Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Elsa
Sung, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





(a)
            The annual report on Form 10-K
      for the year ended June 30, 2010 of the Company fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and




(b)
            Information contained in the Form
      10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
September 28, 2010




/s/ Elsa SungElsa
      SungChief
      Financial Officer
#### TRG Advisors, Inc., Formerly Known as P&A Financial Securities, Inc., Appellant-Respondent, et al., Plaintiffs, v P&A Retirement Plan Services, Inc., et al. Appellants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[963 NYS2d 914]

Appeal and cross appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered July 18, 2012. The order and judgment granted in part and denied in part the motion of plaintiff TRG Advisors, Inc., formerly known as P&A Financial Securities, Inc., for partial summary judgment.

Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on January 23, 2013, and filed in the Erie County Clerk’s Office on January 29, 2013,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal and cross appeal are unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Present—Scudder, EJ., Centra, Carni, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               1,521
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        9,281
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          24,479
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     203,493
<PP&E>                                               266,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                       124,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       345,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                403,861
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             610
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           58,644
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         345,827
<SALES>                                              151,185
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     241,849
<CGS>                                                126,888
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        126,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   25,372
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (366,223)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (366,223)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.06)



</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of FieldPoint Petroleum Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ray Reaves, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  _/s/ Ray Reaves_______ Ray Reaves Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer August 14, 2009
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2200 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Office of the Under Secretary for Natural Resources 

and Environment for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Office of the Under Secretary for Natural Resources and Environment for fiscal 

year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2200 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, OFFICE 

3 OF THE UNDER SECRETARY FOR NATURAL 

4 RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT FOR FISCAL 

5 YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for US Department of Agriculture, Office of the 

9 Under Secretary for Natural Resources and Environment 

10 for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $875,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brendon P. Berndt, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 279]

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), rendered February 1, 2011, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 99.3

Tuesday, April 26, 2000, 09:05 am Eastern Time

Press Release
SOURCE: Bentley Communications Corp.

Bentley Communications Corp. to `Westernize' China E-Commerce

LONG BEACH, California, April 26 /PRNewswire/ -- Bentley Communications Corp.
(OTCBB: BTLY) today announced it has signed letters of intent with several
additional PRC companies for the introduction of their products to world and
wholesale retail markets.

Bentley Communications Corp. is currently working with many manufacturers in the
People's Republic of China to "Westernize" their products and innovate new ones.

The products include consumer electronics, appliances, telecommunications
products, computers and accessories. Bentley Communications Corp. will
coordinate marketing efforts, creating increased acceptance of quality consumer
and industrial products that are widely used in Asia along with the Chinese
brand names they represent. Many Western name brand companies, whose reputations
for presenting superior products, source their manufacturing in China. These
same products will be introduced to the world through Joint Ventures via the
Internet and traditional distribution channels, at factory-direct prices. The
main difference will be the labels on the boxes. They will carry the Bentley
label or their own Chinese brand name.

"China is ready for the same widespread recognition for its product quality that
Japan began to experience in the sixties. The opportunities coming to us because
of our business development efforts in Asia, indicate that our approach is the
right one. These contracts are expected to yield significant cash flow for
Bentley," said Gordon Lee, President of Bentley Communications Corp.

Bentley Communications Corp. is implementing a warranty service network of
third-party providers in order to service the products. Bentley corporate
offices in Long Beach, California will coordinate international marketing,
shipping and handling. Warehousing for North America will take place in the
nearby Port of Los Angeles.

Bentley Communications Corp. world headquarters is located at 100 Oceangate,
Suite 750, Long Beach, California 90802 and its phone number is (562) 435-5355.
The Hong Kong Corporate Office of Bentleycomm Asia Ltd., a wholly owned
subsidiary of BTLY, is located in the prestigious Central Plaza.

                                                                              58
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STEVEN B. KING, as Trustee of the Restated Trust of Denise Reale,

Appellant,

v.

SCOTT PORTMAN, RYAN COUGHLIN, SHERRY ZIMAND,

DARLENE LISS, FRANK J. REALE, JR., and

DEAN REALE, individuals, and KIMBERLY ANN COUGHLIN,

as Executrix/Personal Representative of the Estate of BARBARA MAYO,

Appellees.

No. 4D17-242

[February 15, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Marc H. Gold, Judge; L.T. Case No. PRC 11-0003799.

Steven L. Brannock and Sarah C. Pellenbarg of Brannock & 

Humphries, Tampa, for appellant.

No appearance, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., GROSS and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.