alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.8

                                LETTER OF INTENT

This document shall serve as the exclusive Internet Marketer for China National
Electronics Imp. & Exp. Sichuan Co.'s products through Bentley Communications
Corp. Web sites. China National Electronics Imp. & Exp. Sichuan Co. shall
provide Bentley Communications Corp. the guarantees in pricing, delivery and
quality and sample products (upon availability).

     o    Both Companies agree on a 50/50 percent split on the net profit
          interest on the sales of the product

     o    Bentley Communications Corp. shall provide International sales and
          marketing through one of or up to 10 or more of Bentley's INTERNET
          websites.

     o    A $10 USD monthly membership fee, payable annually, at $120 USD, net
          30.

     o    China National Electronics Imp. & Exp. Sichuan Co. will provide
          guarantee all pricing, delivery, and quality and sample products that
          are advertised with Bentley Communications Corp.

     o    A 90 day grace period is granted till payment is due. Upon the date of
          agreement in which China National Electronics Imp. & Exp. Sichuan Co.
          will pay Bentley Communications Corp. to transfer said product and
          will allow Bentley Communications Corp. to place on a special surplus
          website and send 10% gross to Bentley Communications Corp. on all
          sales.

     o    That both companies are subject to independent audit annually.

Witness:  ROCTECH HK Ltd.                     Bentley Communications Corp.
/s/ Patrick Rocillo                           /s/ Gordon F. Lee
---------------------------------             ----------------------------------
Patrick Rocillo/ President/CEO                Gordon F. Lee/ CEO/Chairman


China National Electronics Imp. & Exp. Sichuan Co.
/s/ Lily Lee
---------------------------------
Lily Lee/Deputy General Manager


                                                                              46
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1340 NORBET STEVEN WILCOX,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v. JAMES L. MORGAN, WARDEN,

Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky in case no. 3:06-CV-496, Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell. ON MOTION 

### ORDER Norbet Steven Wilcox moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court notes that Wilcox has not responded to the court's May 29, 2009 order concerning this court's lack of jurisdiction in this case. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: This appeal is dismissed. The motion to leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. FOR THE COURT 

### JUN 25 

# 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Date Jan Horbaly Clerk 

### 111.41) U.S. TUN' 9F APPFALS FOR THt FEDtRAL CIRCUIT

JUN 2 5 2009

JAN HOlitire CLERK cc: Norbet Steven Wilcox Todd D. Ferguson, Esq. s8 ISSUED AS A MANDATE: 

### JUN 25 

# 2009
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2087 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The Judiciary, Administrative Office of the US Courts, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 

2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The 

Judiciary, Administrative Office of the US Courts, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 THE JUDICIARY, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF 

5 THE US COURTS, SALARIES AND EXPENSES 

6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for The Judiciary, Administrative Office of the US 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2087 IH

1 Courts, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may 

2 not exceed $92,413,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending
April 2, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, J. Frank Harrison, III, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven D. Westphal,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                                       |  | 
|-------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ J. Frank Harrison, III             |  | 
|J. Frank Harrison, III                 |  | 
|Chairman of the Board of Directors and |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer                |  | 
|May 11, 2006                           |  | 
|                                       | 
|/s/ Steven D. Westphal                 |  | 
|Steven D. Westphal                     |  | 
|Senior Vice President and              |  | 
|Chief Financial Officer                |  | 
|May 11, 2006                           |  |
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00308-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.C.

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021EM503388

Honorable Nick Catoe Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 9, 2022

DISMISSED

Appellant Guillermo Valverde III filed a notice of appeal, stating that he desired to appeal 

from all portions of the trial court’s Order Establishing the Parent-Child Relationship “including 

monthly payments, medical support, and retroactive child support.” On August 30, 2022, he filed 

his appellant’s brief. On August 31, 2022, we issued an order stating that his brief violated Texas 

Rule of Appellate Procedure 38 in that it did not (1) identify the parties and counsel; (2) include a 

table of contents; (3) include an index of authorities; (4) include a statement of the case; (5) include

a brief statement of the issues presented; (6) include record references in the statement of facts; (7) 

include a summary of the argument; or (8) include a conclusion stating the nature of the relief 

sought. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1. We explained that while substantial compliance with Rule 38 is 

sufficient, we could order a party to amend, supplement, or redraw a brief if it flagrantly violates 
04-22-00308-CV

- 2 -

Rule 38. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9(a). In our order, we concluded that the formal defects described 

above constitute flagrant violations of Rule 38. 

Therefore, we ordered Appellant Guillermo Valverde III to file an amended brief on or 

before September 20, 2022. We explained that if the amended brief did not correct the violations, 

we would strike the brief and prohibit appellant from filing another. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9(a); 

see also id. 42.3(c) (allowing dismissal of appellant’s appeal if appellant fails to comply with a 

requirement of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure or an order of this court). Appellant has 

not filed an amended appellant’s brief or otherwise responded to our order. We therefore strike 

Appellant’s brief and dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9(a); 42.3(c). 

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.3

                                                                         ANNEX A


                              ARTICLES OF AMENDENT
                                       OF
                               ANTEON CORPORATION

                 ----------------------------------------------


To the State Corporation Commission
Commonwealth of Virginia

      The following Articles of Amendment are hereby submitted pursuant to
the provisions of the Virginia Stock Corporation Act on behalf of the
corporation hereinafter named.

      1. The name of the corporation (hereinafter referred to as the
"Corporation") is Anteon Corporation.

      2. The Capitalization as set forth in the Articles of Incorporation of the
Corporation is hereby amended to read as follows:

      "There shall be one class of stock, Common Stock, and there shall be
      17,661,840 shares authorized for issuance at a par value of $0.05 per
      share. Each share of Common Stock shall have full voting rights.

      3. The date of adoption of the amendment herein provided for was August
22, 2000.

      4. The amendment herein provided for was adopted by unanimous consent of
all of the stockholders of the Corporation.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused these Articles of Amendment
to be executed in its corporate name on this 22nd day of August, 2000.


                                     ANTEON CORPORATION


                                     By:
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name: Joseph M. Kampf
                                         Title: President and CEO
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2066 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Executive Office 

of the President, Council of Economic Advisors, Salaries and Expenses 

for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Executive Office of the President, Council of Economic Advisors, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, 

5 COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISORS, SALARIES 

6 AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Executive Office of the President, Council of EcoVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:17 Apr 18, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2066.IH H2066

sspencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2066 IH

1 nomic Advisors, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 

2 2024 may not exceed $4,120,000. 

Æ 


sspencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
#### Steven Allen BUTLER, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Derral G. ADAMS, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 05-15794.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 12, 2006.*

Decided June 19, 2006.

Steven Allen Butler, Corcoran, CA, pro se.

Mary J. Graves, Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, Gregory A. Ott, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent — Appellee.

Before: KLEINFELD, PAEZ, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Steven Allen Butler appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition, which challenges his 1998 conviction and sentence for lewd and lascivious conduct with a minor. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Butler contends that the district court erred in dismissing his petition as untimely. Specifically, he contends that he is entitled to statutory tolling from the filing of his first state post-conviction peti*656tion in 2000 until the denial of his last post-conviction petition in 2003. The Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act provides for “statutory tolling” of its one-year statute of limitations while a “properly filed” petition for state post-conviction collateral review is “pending.” 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2). Here, the limitations period ran for 10 months before Butler filed his first state post-conviction petition on February 29, 2000. Even if we assume that the limitations period was tolled for the entirety of time from the filing of Butler’s first post-conviction petition until the California Supreme Court rejected his last state petition, Butler’s federal petition would still be untimely, because he did not file it until 5 months later. *See id.; see also Gaston v. Palmer,*447 F.3d 1165, 1166 (9th Cir.2006) (finding intervals of 10, 15, and 18 months unreasonable and concluding that interval tolling did not make petition timely).

Butler also contends that he is entitled to equitable tolling. Because there were no extraordinary circumstances beyond Butler’s control that made it impossible to file his petition on time, his petition is not saved by equitable tolling. *See Miranda v. Castro,*292 F.3d 1063, 1066 (9th Cir.2002).

Finally, Butler seeks to expand the certificate of appealability (“COA”). We decline to expand the COA because Butler fails to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1736 

To prohibit the availability of funds to provide assistance to foreign countries 

that criminalize or discriminate based on sexual orientation, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2023 

Mr. SANTOS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the availability of funds to provide assistance 

to foreign countries that criminalize or discriminate 

based on sexual orientation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equality and Fiscal 

5 Accountability Protection Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1736 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 FOREIGN COUNTRIES THAT CRIMINALIZE OR 

3 DISCRIMINATE BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTA4 TION. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—Except as provided in subsection 

6 (b), no Federal funds may be obligated or expended to 

7 provide assistance, directly or indirectly, to a country de8 scribed in subsection (c). 

9 (b) EXCEPTION.— 

10 (1) IN GENERAL.—The President may author11 ize an obligation or expenditure of Federal funds to 

12 assist a country described in subsection (c) only if 

13 the President determines, on a case-by-case basis, 

14 that such proposed obligation or expenditure is vital 

15 to the national security interests of the United 

16 States. 

17 (2) BRIEFING.—Upon making a determination 

18 under paragraph (1), the President, acting through 

19 the Secretary of State, shall provide to the appro20 priate congressional committees and congressional 

21 leadership a briefing on such determination. 

22 (c) COUNTRIES DESCRIBED.—A country described in 

23 this subsection is a foreign country the government of 

24 which the President determines has enacted or established 

25 and is implementing any provision of law, or provision 

26 which has the force and effect of law, that criminalizes 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1736 IH

1 or discriminates on the basis of sexual orientation, includ2 ing by criminalizing homosexuality or same-sex marriage. 

3 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

4 (1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMIT5 TEES.—The term ‘‘appropriate congressional com6 mittees’’ means the following: 

7 (A) The Committee on Foreign Affairs and 

8 the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 

9 of the House of Representatives. 

10 (B) The Committee on Foreign Relations 

11 and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the 

12 Senate. 

13 (2) CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP.—The term 

14 ‘‘congressional leadership’’ means the following: 

15 (A) The Speaker of the House of Rep16 resentatives. 

17 (B) The minority leader of the House of 

18 Representatives. 

19 (C) The majority leader of the Senate. 

20 (D) The minority leader of the Senate. 

21 (e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect on 

22 the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment 

23 of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Mark Mancuso, Respondent, v J & Velco Co., L.P., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[872 NYS2d 52]

*578Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered October 11, 2007, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained on premises owned by defendant Velco and operated as a restaurant by defendants Ray and Hocine either individually or as principals of defendant East 166 Rest., Inc., denied Velco’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it and for summary judgment on its cross claims for contractual indemnification against East 166, Ray and Hocine, and denied Ray and Hocine’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In support of its claim that it is an out-of-possession landlord with no maintenance or repair obligations, Velco submits an unsigned lease between itself as landlord and defendants Ray and Hocine as tenant. While Ray and Hocine admit that they signed a lease, the latter asserts that he signed only on behalf of East 166, and the former asserts that he does not recognize the unsigned lease proffered by Velco or recall in what capacity he signed the lease that he did sign. Neither East 166’s name nor its doing business as Grandma’s Kitchen is noted anywhere on the unsigned lease. These circumstances raise triable issues of fact that preclude summary judgment in favor of Velco, including, with respect to the complaint, whether it agreed to keep the premises in good repair *(see Guzman v Haven Plaza Hous. Dev. Fund Co.,*69 NY2d 559 [1987]; *Kreimer v Rockefeller Group,*2 AD3d 407, 408 [2003]), and, with respect to its cross claims, exactly who its tenants are. The same circumstances also raise triable issues of fact that preclude summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against Ray and Hocine, including whether their alleged principal, defendant East 166, is the lessee of the premises. In this regard, we note that the unsigned lease is dated May 27, 2003, several months prior to the filing of East 166’s certificate of incorporation on August 12, 2003. We also note Ray’s testimony that he signed a lease in January or February 2003. Concur—Saxe, J.E, Friedman, Nardelli, Sweeny and DeGrasse, JJ.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2088 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The Judiciary, Federal 

Judiciary Center, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The 

Judiciary, Federal Judiciary Center, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 THE JUDICIARY, FEDERAL JUDICIARY CEN5 TER, SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL 

6 YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for The Judiciary, Federal Judiciary Center, Salaries 


DMWilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2088 IH

1 and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $29,819,000. 

Æ 


DMWilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
----

Exhibit 31.1 

CERTIFICATION

I, George G. Usher, Chief Executive Officer of Polydex PharmaceuticalsLimited (the "Company") certify that: 

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10–Q of the Company for the fiscalquarter ended July 31, 2007; 

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periodpresented in this report; 

4.     TheCompany’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a–15(e) and 15d–15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:

(a)    designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report was being prepared; 

(b)    evaluated theeffectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and 

(c)    disclosed inthis report any change in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     TheCompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of theCompany’s board of directors: 

(a)    allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and 

(b)    any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Dated: September 14, 2007 

/s/ George G. Usher 

Chief Executive Officer 

Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited 

----