alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2079 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2079

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The Judiciary, 
 Supreme Court, Care of the Building and Grounds for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The Judiciary, 
 Supreme Court, Care of the Building and Grounds for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE JUDICIARY, 
              SUPREME COURT, CARE OF THE BUILDING AND GROUNDS FOR 
              FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for The Judiciary, Supreme 
Court, Care of the Building and Grounds for fiscal year 2024 may not 
exceed $14,434,000.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Seaena, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year end December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin T. Ryan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/Kevin T. Ryan |
|------------------|

Kevin T. Ryan

Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statements (Nos. 333-93933,333-105424, 333-105425, 333-111037 and 333-133750) of Civitas BankGroup, Inc. on Form S-8 and theRegistration Statement (No. 333-107352) of Civitas BankGroup, Inc. on Form S-3 of our reports datedMarch 9, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Civitas BankGroup, Inc.Civitas BankGroup, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of CivitasBankGroup, Inc. and subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Civitas BankGroup,Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005.                                         /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLCBrentwood, Tennessee
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1


  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his
capacity as an officer of MicroIslet, Inc. (the "Company"), that, to his
knowledge, the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.

Dated: April 11, 2008

            /S/ MICHAEL J. ANDREWS
            ----------------------
            Michael J. Andrews
            Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
            (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-51057 c/w No. 03-51058 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANGEL MAGALLANES-TORRES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-99-CR-312-PRM

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Angel Magallanes-Torres appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Magallanes-Torres complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. Magallanes-Torres thus contends that hisNo. 03-51057 c/w 03-51058 -2- sentence should not exceed the two-year maximum terms of imprisonment and supervised release prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Magallanes-Torres acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of FieldPoint Petroleum Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ray Reaves, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Ray Reaves________________ Ray Reaves Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer August 13, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sycamore Networks, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending July 31,
2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel E. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.

|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|/s/    DANIEL E. SMITH                                 
|Daniel E. Smith                                        
|President and Chief Executive OfficerSeptember 21, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,590
<SECURITIES>                                       888
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,787
<ALLOWANCES>                                       513
<INVENTORY>                                      7,828
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,998
<PP&E>                                           9,673
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,564
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         53
<COMMON>                                           243
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,386
<SALES>                                          5,156
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,156
<CGS>                                            4,827
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,266
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,088)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,963)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        14
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,977)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (97)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,074)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31)
        

</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 18-12721

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cr-00341-MHC-CMS-6

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FRANCO TEZA MENDEZ, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(January 9, 2019)

Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 18-12721 Date Filed: 01/09/2019 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Dennis C. O’Brien, appointed counsel for Franco Teza Mendez in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant 

and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our 

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the 

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire 

record reveals no arguable issues of merit on direct appeal, counsel’s motion to 

withdraw is GRANTED, and Teza Mendez’s convictions and sentences are 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 18-12721 Date Filed: 01/09/2019 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000

       

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                              93,823
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       188,506
<ALLOWANCES>                        2,754
<INVENTORY>                         166,890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    459,814
<PP&E>                              359,545
<DEPRECIATION>                      221,955
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      691,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               127,093
<BONDS>                             35,693
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                            1,027
<OTHER-SE>                          508,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        691,154
<SALES>                             869,475
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    869,475
<CGS>                               513,809
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       513,809
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    191,873
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    646
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  5,003
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     165,782
<INCOME-TAX>                        58,024
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 107,758
<DISCONTINUED>                      19,416
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        88,342
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       0.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.97
<FN>
This financial data schedule has been restated in accordance with SFAS No. 128
(Earnings Per Share).
</FN>


        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION OF LINDA BRYSON

I, Linda Bryson, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Triad Industries,Inc;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

(4) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of the date within 90 days prior to filing date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

(5) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

(6) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                                                          /s/ Linda Bryson
Date: March 24, 2004                           --------------------
                                                              Linda Bryson
                                                              President
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 19, 2017

Order 

Clerk

July 19, 2017

152448(149)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 152448

v COA: 317892

St. Clair CC: 10-002936-FC

TIA MARIE-MITCHELL SKINNER,

Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Attorney General to file 

a late amicus curiae brief is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on July 14, 2017, is 

accepted for filing.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135221 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135221 

 COA: 278628 

Wayne CC: 03-003366-01 

MARQUE TAVARES BLANKS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 8, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p0519 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 27, 2008 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2285 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2285

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
      of Agriculture, Rural Utilities Service, Distance Learning, 
       Telemedicine, and Broadband Program for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the 
   Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
      of Agriculture, Rural Utilities Service, Distance Learning, 
       Telemedicine, and Broadband Program for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR US DEPARTMENT OF 
              AGRICULTURE, RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, DISTANCE LEARNING, 
              TELEMEDICINE, AND BROADBAND PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for US Department of 
Agriculture, Rural Utilities Service, Distance Learning, Telemedicine, 
and Broadband Program for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $29,851,000.
                                 <all>
```
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF .TEXAS

State !?onrd

of fkairdrox’xms hq5iIl) TQxlfl and Coo~otologiats.

State Eoerd of I:airdrcssars end Costzetolo&its, Fage 2

it is requiredthat cuoh non-rmidmt shall have &erved the **hc~s** requiredas **n** student. Elsowhore, in the !&atutg; it is provided that n student shall warn? 3000 hours. ?rcsumbly, the sbhool of. the other state,menticned in ycur lettoy, is a licensed soboolv:ithln the purviov:

0.f the stwtute, YOU ers thcrofol*e respectfullyadvised that it is the opinion of this depurtmnt thiit the fipplicant

desorlbedby you in your letter shouldbe remitted to COP plete the required1000 hour course us proscribedby our law, and therouftcrbe pmitted to take the state board's exaainution,and tbzat he **WOULD not**  be requijyed to enroll for a full six ronths' cowso of 1000 hours to be clir,fblo thorofor.WQ t33lat this RiltsWtr3 YOU2 inptiry Gtitiofactory ma we rmain
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0110-CG-M

)

NALL’S NEWTON TIRE, a/k/a 

NALL’S NEWTON TIRE SERVICE, 

INC.,

)

)

)

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This cause is before the court on the Defendant’s Motion to Request 

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company to Issue Second Check to Satisfy Judgment 

(Doc. 144), the Plaintiff’s response thereto (Doc. 146), and the Defendant’s Motion 

for Order to Clerk’s Office to Endorse Over Partial Payment of Judgment (Doc. 145). 

The Clerk of Court is not authorized to endorse over a check deposited into 

the Court’s Registry; therefore, the motion for order (Doc. 145) is DENIED as 

MOOT. The Court has ascertained that the additional $6,065.15 left out of the 

amount deposited with the Court has been paid to defense counsel; therefore, the 

motion to request issuance of a second check (Doc. 145) is deemed to be MOOT.

The Clerk has advised the Court that the check deposited with the Court is 

clear for disbursement; therefore, the Clerk of Court is directed to disburse the 

$362,119.97 in funds to defense counsel, K. Scott Stapp or L. Hunter Compton, Jr. 

Case 2:14-cv-00110-CG-M Document 147 Filed 01/04/16 Page 1 of 2
2

with Manley, Traeger, Perry & Stapp, P.O. Box 590, Demopolis, Alabama 36732.

DONE and ORDERED this 4th day of January, 2016.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:14-cv-00110-CG-M Document 147 Filed 01/04/16 Page 2 of 2