alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6986

GARY LEE HARRIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

A. D. ROBERTSON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 97-7106

GARY LEE HARRIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

A. D. ROBERTSON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Senior District

Judge. (CA-97-951-A)
2

Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 10, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Lee Harris, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Harris v. Robertson, CA-97-951-A (E.D. Va. July 2 and

14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LAURIE B. JOHNS and JOSHUA R. :

JOHNS, individually and on behalf of a

class of persons similarly situated, :

Plaintiffs, :

vs. : Civil Action No. 14-0254-KD-C

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., :

Defendant.

ORDER

This action is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation, the objection 

filed by defendant Wells Fargo Bank NA, and the response to the objection filed by 

plaintiffs Laurie B. Johns and Joshua R. Johns (docs. 23, 25, 28). 

For motions to dismiss, the Court need only find sufficient facts to render a claim 

plausible. By referring to Wells Fargo as servicing the loan, this is sufficient to allege that it 

is a loan servicing company. Of course, Wells Fargo will be able to challenge the 

sufficiency of the evidence to support this allegation on motion for summary judgment. 

Therefore, after due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo

determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated 

November 6, 2014, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss filed by defendant Wells Fargo (doc. 14) is 

GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The plaintiffs’ 15 U.S.C. § 1692e(11) claim 

is dismissed with leave for plaintiffs to file, on or before January 23, 2015, a motion for 

leave to amend their complaint to properly allege a violation of § 1692(e)(11). The motion 

is otherwise DENIED. 

DONE this 12th day of January 2015.

s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00254-KD-C Document 29 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7024

TONY CURTIS KILE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

HOWARD PAINTER, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE

OF WEST VIRGINIA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District

Judge. (CA-97-97-1)

Submitted: December 14, 1999 Decided: December 29, 1999

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony Curtis Kile, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Dawn

Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA,

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Tony Curtis Kile appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Kile v. Painter, No. CA-97-97-1 (N.D.W.

Va. June 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6213

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DUSTIN ALAN HILL,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior

District Judge. (5:09-hc-02069-BR)

Submitted: September 20, 2010 Decided: November 4, 2010

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Jane E. Pearce, 

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Susan Umstead, Research and 

Writing Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. 

George E. B. Holding, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. MayParker, Assistant United States Attorney, David T. Huband, 

Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dustin Hill appeals the district court’s order finding 

that he continues to satisfy the criteria for commitment set 

forth at 18 U.S.C. § 4246(a) (2006) and continuing his 

commitment to the custody of the Attorney General. We affirm. 

At a hearing, Dr. Jill Grant, a clinical psychologist 

at FMC-Butner, testified that Hill suffers from disorganized 

type of schizophrenia. Evaluators also gave Hill a “rule-out”

diagnosis of schizo-affective disorder, bipolar type, “based on 

his symptoms of mania, hypomania, and depressive episodes 

throughout the years.” Dr. Holly Rogers, an independent 

evaluator, concurred that Hill suffers from disorganized 

schizophrenia. She testified that Hill’s psychiatric illness is 

only partially controlled with medication and that his poor 

judgment and poor impulse control increase the likelihood of 

future dangerousness. Dr. Rogers agreed with Dr. Grant that 

Hill satisfies the criteria for continued commitment set forth 

in § 4246. Based on this testimony and other evidence of 

record, including a forensic update, the district court found by 

clear and convincing evidence that Hill meets the criteria for 

commitment. The court ordered that Hill’s commitment continue.

After reviewing the record, we conclude that the 

district court did not clearly err in its determination that 

Hill presently suffers “from a mental disease or defect as a 
3

result of which his release would create a substantial risk of 

bodily injury to another person or serious damage to property of 

another.” See 18 U.S.C. § 4246(a); United States v. Cox, 964

F.2d 1431, 1433 (4th Cir. 1992) (stating standard of review). 

We accordingly affirm. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not significantly 

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2133 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2133

 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
      Agencies, Office of Government Ethics for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
      Agencies, Office of Government Ethics for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR INDEPENDENT 
              AGENCIES, OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS FOR FISCAL YEAR 
              2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Independent Agencies, 
Office of Government Ethics for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 
$17,019,000.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.01

       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                       2002 (Rule 13a-14(a) Certification)


I, Frederick J. Slack, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of 3Si
Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date");
and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
Registrant's internal controls; and

6. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

By:/s/ Frederick J. Slack
Frederick J. Slack, President/CEO
Date: February 11, 2005
! " #$%&'

#(+,-,,-+,	+$,$#	,

.


//////////"//////////

#

"0
















$"
(1

#(1


*2 0
1


!
 "0

2 0
1

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

#30 .


 .

.
4 
 !"" .
  
#$

%&'
 .

003"0
03"
)"
 
*
"


.."

" )"
5 
*6)

*7

0


)6.
#

"

$00""3 " #$

%88 9."

" .09: .
3*6"
0
"
.#;%4


.
"

""
.#$%&''&9.

<
..
6
33*)*
9

IT IS ORDERED..
0"1

-(+- ;	(,-.


="3
 "*603"
"


03"0
(as reflected in 

the last judgment issued)  0."is reduced to 

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

-<
3".
7"
3
9**3"".
> 0

 ".**
0



IT IS SO ORDERED



1

Judge’s signature

-


1

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

 Southern District of Alabama

JOSPEH VALINSKY 12-00069-004

12633-003

2-27-2013

Pro Se

✔

✔

70 60 months

2-27-2013

5-1-2015

11-1-2015 United States District Judge

Callie V.S. Granade 

U.S. District Judge

Digitally signed by Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge 

DN: cn=Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge, o=U.S. 

Government, ou=Federal Judiciary, 

email=efile_granade@alsd.uscourts.gov, c=US 

Date: 2015.05.01 13:09:17 -06'00'

Case 1:12-cr-00069-CG-N Document 151 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE> 1


     Independent Accountants' Report on Applying Agreed-Upon
                           Procedures


To Household Finance Corporation

We have performed procedures enumerated below in items A. and B.
in conjunction with Section 4.11 of the Master Sale and Servicing
Agreement, dated June 1, 1999 (the "Agreement").

A.  We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted
 auditing standards, the consolidated financial statements of
 Household Finance Corporation (the "Servicer") and subsidiaries
 as of December 31, 1999, and have issued our report thereon dated
 January 14, 2000.  We have not audited any financial statements
 of the Servicer as of any date or for any period subsequent to
 December 31, 1999, or performed any audit procedures subsequent
 to the date of our report on those statements.  As part of our
 audit, we reviewed documents and records relating to the
 servicing of consumer automobile finance receivables under the
 Agreement.  In connection with our audit, we noted no exceptions
 or errors in the records relating to the servicing of consumer
 automobile finance loans that, in our opinion, generally accepted
 auditing standards required us to report.

B.  We have performed the procedure described in the following
 paragraph, which was agreed to by the management of the Servicer,
 with respect to Section 4.11 of the Agreement, in conjunction
 with the servicing of consumer automobile finance receivables
 owned by Household Automotive Trust III.  This agreed-upon
 procedure was performed in accordance with standards established
 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  The
 sufficiency of the procedure is solely the responsibility of the
 Servicer.  Consequently, we make no representation regarding the
 sufficiency of the procedure described below either for the
 purpose for which this report has been requested or for any other
 purpose.

The procedure and associated findings are as follows:

  From the Monthly Servicer's Certificates prepared by the
  Servicer between June, 1999 and December, 1999, we selected
  the following months and performed the following:

    We have compared the mathematical calculation of each amount
    set forth in the Monthly Servicer's Certificates to the
    Servicer's accounting records for the month of August, 1999,
    September, 1999, and November, 1999, and for Series 1999-1
    and found it to be in the agreement.  Our comparisons were
    based on records provided to us by the Servicer and the
    methodology set forth in the Agreement.

With respect to the procedure performed in item B. above, we were
not engaged to, and did not, perform an audit, the objective of
which would be the expression of an opinion on the Monthly
Servicer's Certificates described above.  Accordingly, we do not
express such an opinion.  Had we been engaged to perform
additional procedures, other matters might have come to our
attention that would have been reported to you.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the
Specified Users and should not be used for any other purpose.



Chicago, Illinois
April 26, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000316736
<NAME>                        FIELDPOINT PETROLEUM CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         175,999
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  238,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                   74,192
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               471,987
<PP&E>                                         2,152,513
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (753,424)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,855,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          488,421
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       65,819
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,443,110)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,855,481
<SALES>                                        340,842
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               32,045
<CGS>                                          119,105
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  220,690
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               114
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             19,676
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                132,635
<INCOME-TAX>                                   10,397
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            122,238
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   122,238
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .02




</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      condition with the Amendment No. 2 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polydex
      Pharmaceuticals Limited (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended July 31,
      2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Sharon L. Wardlaw, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            
            the
              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
            
            the
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






By
                /s/ Sharon L. Wardlaw


Sharon
      L.
      Wardlaw,


Chief
      Financial Officer


March
      21,
      2006




This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
      “Exchange Act”). This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
      reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
      the
      Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates
      it
      by reference.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








---
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the annual report of Internet Gold-Golden Lines Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ehud Yahalom, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Ehud Yahalom*


Ehud Yahalom


Chief Financial Officer




April 27, 2015




*           The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.




This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.