alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2194 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Environmental 

Protection Agency, Hazards Substance Superfund for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Environmental Protection Agency, Hazards Substance Superfund for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2194 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 

3 HAZARDS SUBSTANCE SUPERFUND FOR FIS4 CAL YEAR 2024. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

6 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail7 able for Environmental Protection Agency, Hazards Sub8 stance Superfund for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

9 $1,091,947,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 99.1


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Choice One Communications Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K (the "Report") for the year ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Steve
M. Dubnik, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/Steve M. Dubnik
-------------------
Steve M. Dubnik
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2003
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the 1999
Long-Term Incentive Plan, the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1999 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan of Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc., of our report dated
October 19, 2001 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc. included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended September 29, 2001.


                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Diego, California
December 11, 2001
Exhibit 12
 
 First Quarter2009
    
    
    2008Computation
of Earnings:Income (loss) before income taxes
    
    $
    11,883
    
    
    $
    (6,759
    )Add:Interest expense
    
    
    8,693
    
    
    
    9,820Amortization of debt premium/discount and expenses
    
    
    603
    
    
    
    615Interest portion of rent expense
    
    
    346
    
    
    
    308Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    21,525
    
    
    $
    3,984Computation of Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    8,693
    
    
    $
    9,820Capitalized interest
    
    
    79
    
    
    
    158Amortization of debt premium/discount and expenses
    
    
    603
    
    
    
    615Interest portion of rent expense
    
    
    346
    
    
    
    308Fixed charges
    
    $
    9,721
    
    
    $
    10,901Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    2.21
    
    
    
    0.37
#### In the Matter of Karen M., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[872 NYS2d 472]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Hunt, J.), dated June 6, 2008, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated May 6, 2008, made upon the appellant’s admission, finding that the appellant committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of menacing in the third degree, adjudged her to be a juvenile delinquent, and placed her on probation for a period of 15 months.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

*735The Family Court has broad discretion as to the dispositional orders it enters (see *Matter of Ashley D.,*55 AD3d 605 [2008]; *Matter of Ashley H.,*53 AD3d 578 [2008]; *Matter of Melissa B.,*49 AD3d 536 [2008]). Here, contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in adjudicating her a juvenile delinquent and placing her on probation for a period of 15 months instead of granting an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal. This disposition was appropriate in light of, inter alia, the nature of the incident, as well as the appellant’s deficient academic performance and her poor record of attendance in school (see *Matter of Erika R.,*55 AD3d 740 [2008]; *Matter of Tyrell D.,*24 AD3d 440, 441 [2005]). Rivera, J.R, Santucci, Garni and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.28




Assignment Agreement of the Woodland Lease




The Assignor:   Anhui Xingguang Investment (Group) Co., Ltd.


The Assignee:    Anhui Yida Tourism Development Co., Ltd.




Since 2008, in order to finance and develop the project of Ming Dynasty Entertainment World of Bengbu, the shareholders of the Assignee start the project investigation and the consultation with the villagers’ committees within the intended development zone on the leasing of woodland. To promote effectively the work of project investigation and other preliminary work, enhance the efficiency and lower the cost of woodland leasing, the Assignee tries to finish the leasing work of most woodlands within the intended development zone earlier, the prerequisite to the fulfillment of the project, so before the official signature of the project and the founding of the Assignee, the Assignor has signed five Woodland Lease Agreements (see Attachment 1) with the villagers’ committees of Lilou Township within the intended development zone. Now based on the principle of consistency of rights and duties, the assignor agrees to transfer all the rights and liabilities stated in the said five Woodland Lease Agreements to the Assignee. Both parties agree as follows:





1.
When the Contract is signed and comes into force, the Assignee shall havetherights andbearthe liabilities as prescribed in the said five Woodland Lease Agreements originally agreed on by the Lessee (Anhui Xingguang Investment (Group) Co., Ltd.).





2.
All the prescribed expenses shall be paid by the Assignee to the Assignor timely according to the terms and conditions set out in the said five Woodland Lease Agreements, and the Assignor shall pay them to the villagers’ committees as prescribed.





3.
This Contract shall come into force after being signed by the authorized representatives of both parties and officially sealed. The Contract is done in quadruplicate, with two for each party, and each copy shall be equally valid.





LESSOR (Seal): Anhui Xingguang Investment (Group) Co., Ltd.


Authorized Representative: Sun Hui


Date: 02/26/2011




LESSEE (Seal): Anhui Yida Tourism Development Co., Ltd.


Authorized Representative: Chen Minhua


Date: 02/26/2011
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2351 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2351

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
 State, International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
 State, International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 
              INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS CONTROL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR 
              FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of State, 
International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement for fiscal year 
2024 may not exceed $1,391,004,000.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In condition with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sharon L. Wardlaw, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|By/s/  Sharon L. Wardlaw
|------------------------

Sharon L. Wardlaw,

Chief Financial Officer

September 14, 2005



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of FieldPoint Petroleum Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ray Reaves, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Ray Reaves Ray Reaves Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer November 13, 2006
MultiSo-2015.04.30 EX 10.1












June 3, 2015 


Multi Solutions II, Inc.
4400 Biscayne Boulevard; 10th Floor
Miami, FL 33137


Re:    Amendment No. 5 to Revolving Credit Promissory Note


Reference is made to the Revolving Credit Promissory Note (the “Revolver”) dated April 23, 2012 in consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants contained and other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree to increase the Commitment Amount, as defined in the Revolver, from $350,000 to $450,000 and extend the Maturirty Date of the Revolver to December 31, 2018 from December 31, 2017.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 5 to the Revolving Credit Promissory Note to be duly executed and attested, all as of the date first written above.


BORROWER:


MUTLI SOLUTIONS II, INC., a Florida Corporation




By:    /s/ Robert M. Lundgren        
Name:    Robert M. Lundgren
Director


LENDER:


VECTOR GROUP LTD., a Delaware Corporation




By:    /s/ Marc N. Bell            
Name:    Marc N. Bell
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marco Antonio CAPETILLO-RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-40228.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Oct. 25, 2006.

Sarah Beth Landau, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District Of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Marco Antonio Capetillo-Rivera appeals his guilty-plea conviction of, and sentence for, violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 by being found in the United States without permission after deportation. He argues, in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), that the 46-month term of imprisonment imposed in his case exceeds the statutory maximum sentence allowed for the § 1326(a) offense charged in his indictment. He challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury.

Capetillo-Rivera’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although he contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Capetillo-Rivera properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Steven W. ROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cal A. TERHUNE, Director of CDC; William Duncan, Warden, CMC, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-15681.

D.C. No. CV-98-550-GEB/JFM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2001.1

Decided March 26, 2001.

Before WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

Steven Rose, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison grooming regulations violated his civil rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. *467We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment, *Margolis v. Ryan,*140 F.3d 850, 852 (9th Cir.1998), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment to defendants on Rose’s First Amendment and substantive due process claims because Rose failed to present any evidence that the grooming regulations are not reasonably related to legitimate penological interests. *See Patel v. Penman,*103 F.3d 868, 874 (9th Cir.1996) (substantive due process); *Friedman v. Arizona,*912 F.2d 328, 331 (9th Cir.1990) (First Amendment).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Rose’s equal protection claim because Rose failed to present any evidence that the grooming regulations do not bear a rational relation to a legitimate prison objective. *See Turner v. Safley,*482 U.S. 78, 89, 107 S.Ct. 2254, 96 L.Ed.2d 64 (1987).

Because Rose failed to demonstrate that the prison regulations deprived him of the minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities, the district court properly granted summary judgment on Rose’s Eighth Amendment claim alleging cruel and unusual punishment. *See Farmer v. Brennan,*511 U.S. 825, 834, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994); *Allen v. Sakai*48 F.3d 1082, 1087-88 (9th Cir.1995).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Rose’s claim alleging that the grooming regulations violate the American Indian Religious Freedom Act (“AIRFA”). *See Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protection Assoc.,*485 U.S. 439, 455, 108 S.Ct. 1319, 99 L.Ed.2d 534 (1988) (stating that the AIRFA is a statement of federal policy to protect Indians’ exercise of their religion, and does not create a cause of action).

We decline to consider the issues raised for the first time on appeal in Rose’s reply and declaration received by this Court on July 24, 2000. *See International Union of Bricklayers v. Martin Jaska, Inc.,*752 F.2d 1401, 1404 (9th Cir.1985).

AFFIRMED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6077

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STANLEY HICKMAN,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:93-cr-00144-BO-3)

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 8, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley Hickman, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Stanley Hickman appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Hickman , No. 5:93-cr-00144-BO3 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 17, 2008 & entered Dec. 23, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                          2,140,362
<SECURITIES>                    000
<RECEIVABLES>                   4,675
<ALLOWANCES>                    000
<INVENTORY>                     000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                2,168,560
<PP&E>                          5,422,973
<DEPRECIATION>                  000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  7,591,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           179,007
<BONDS>                         3,858,090
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           000
<PREFERRED>                     000
<COMMON>                        000
<OTHER-SE>                      3,536,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    7,591,533
<SALES>                         1,427,943
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,682,187
<CGS>                           000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   741,427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                530,743
<LOSS-PROVISION>                000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              307,035
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 98,896
<INCOME-TAX>                    000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             98,896
<DISCONTINUED>                  000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 7,829,940
<CHANGES>                       000
<NET-INCOME>                    7,928,836
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   153.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                   153.21
        


</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2241 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Hazardous Materials Management for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Energy and Commerce, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Hazardous Materials Management for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2241 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, HAZ3 ARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT FOR FIS4 CAL YEAR 2024. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

6 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail7 able for US Department of Agriculture, Hazardous Mate8 rials Management for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

9 $3,503,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BEVERLY L. HEARD 

WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

:

:

:

:

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 14-292-CG-M

:

KENYEN R. BROWN, et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there 

having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 

made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss be granted for 

failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and based on the 

defenses absolute immunity and collateral estoppel, and that Plaintiff’s 

Amended Complaint be dismissed with prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED this 28th day of April, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00292-CG-M Document 30 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 1