alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    11,011,900,000
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                  31,000,000
<MORTGAGE>                               2,215,900,000
<REAL-ESTATE>                               76,200,000
<TOTAL-INVEST>                          14,242,300,000
<CASH>                                      26,100,000
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                         198,900,000
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                   1,062,000,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          20,605,500,000
<POLICY-LOSSES>                         13,243,500,000
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                             341,400,000
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                      222,900,000
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                            581,800,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      241,800,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       900,000
<OTHER-SE>                               1,929,900,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            20,605,500,000
<PREMIUMS>                                 648,900,000
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                        749,400,000
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           5,200,000
<OTHER-INCOME>                             416,900,000
<BENEFITS>                               1,012,600,000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                 71,500,000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                       400,300,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            265,000,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                93,100,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        164,700,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               164,700,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.92
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2305 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2305

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
State, Administration of Foreign Affairs, Emergencies in the Diplomatic 
               and Consular Service for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
State, Administration of Foreign Affairs, Emergencies in the Diplomatic 
               and Consular Service for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 
              ADMINISTRATION OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, EMERGENCIES IN THE 
              DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR SERVICE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of State, 
Administration of Foreign Affairs, Emergencies in the Diplomatic and 
Consular Service for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $7,885,000.
                                 <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1959 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health 

and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration 

Family Planning for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration Family Planning for 

fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1959 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV3 ICES, HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES 

4 ADMINISTRATION FAMILY PLANNING FOR 

5 FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Department of Health and Human Services, 

9 Health Resources and Services Administration Family 

10 Planning for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

11 $286,479,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2350 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2350

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
 Treasury, International Affairs Technical Assistance for fiscal year 
                                 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
 Treasury, International Affairs Technical Assistance for fiscal year 
                                 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF 
              TREASURY, INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR 
              FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Treasury, 
International Affairs Technical Assistance for fiscal year 2024 may not 
exceed $30,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Dylan Mc. Nassau County Department of Social Services et al., Respondents; Michelle M. Mc., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Connor Mc. Nassau County Department of Social Services et al., Respondents; Michelle M. Mc., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Michael W., Respondent, v Michelle M. Mc., Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 3.)

[964 NYS2d 209]

In two related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, and a related child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Greenberg, J.), dated April 13, 2011, which, after a hearing, granted the father’s petition for custody of the subject children and awarded her only therapeutic supervised visitation and any other supervised visitation agreed upon by the parties.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court did not improperly delegate its authority to determine visitation issues in the best interests of the children to the court-appointed forensic evaluator *(cf. Matter of Balgley v Cohen,*73 AD3d 1038, 1038 [2010]; *Matter of Sinnott-Turner v Kolba,*60 AD3d 774, 776 [2009]; *Matter of Held v Gomez,*35 AD3d 608, 608 [2006]; *Matter of Grisanti v Grisanti,*4 AD3d 471, 474-475 [2004]; *Johnson v Johnson,*303 AD2d 641, 642 [2003]), or to either or both of the parents *(cf. Matter of Taylor v Jackson,*95 AD3d 1604, 1605 [2012]; *Matter of Taylor v Fry,*63 AD3d 1217, 1219 [2009]; *Matter of William BB. v Susan DD.,*31 AD3d 907, 908 [2006]).

*1050The Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the mother’s counsel’s request to be relieved eight months after the combined dispositional and custody hearing had begun *(see Matter of Khan v Dolly,*39 AD3d 649, 650 [2007]; *Cashdan v Cashdan,*243 AD2d 598, 598 [1997]). There is no evidence that the mother’s conduct rendered it unreasonably difficult for counsel “to carry out employment effectively” *(Green v Gasparini,*24 AD3d 505, 506 [2005]; *see generally Walker v Mount Vernon Hosp.,*5 AD3d 590, 590 [2004]).

The mother’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit. Viewed in totality, the record shows that the mother received meaningful representation *(see Matter of Marra v Hernandez,*102 AD3d 699, 700 [2013]; *Matter of Rodriguez v Suarez,*93 AD3d 730, 730 [2012]; *Matter of Larrier v Williams,*84 AD3d 805, 806 [2011]). The mother failed to show that any of counsel’s alleged deficiencies constituted anything other than a legitimate, albeit unsuccessful, trial strategy *(see Matter of Larrier v Williams,*84 AD3d at 806; *Matter of Lewis v Cross,*80 AD3d 835, 837 [2011]).

Rivera, J.P., Dickerson, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Quinones, Appellant.

[872 NYS2d 688]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J), imposed February 16, 2007, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion. Prudenti, PJ., Skelos, Florio, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
HEB Grocery Company, s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 27, 2015

No. 04-15-00152-CV

Mary BARRERA,

Appellant

v.

HEB GROCERY COMPANY, LP,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-14809

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant's unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. 

Time is extended to August 25, 2015.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
! " #$%&'

#()*+**+)*	)$*$#	*

,


----------"----------

#

".
















$"
(/

#(/


01 .
/


!
 ".

1 .
/

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

#2. ,


 ,

,
3 
 !"" ,
  
#$

%&'
 ,

..2".
.2"
4"
 
0
"


,,"

" 4"
5 
064

07

.


46,
#

"

$..""2 " #$

%88 9,"

" ,.9: ,
206"
.
"
,#;%3


,
"

""
,#$%&''&9,

<
,,
6
22040
9

IT IS ORDERED,,
."/

+()+ ;	(*+,


="2
 "06.2"
"


.2".
(as reflected in 

the last judgment issued)  .,"is reduced to 

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

+<
2",
7"
2
9002"",
> .

 ",00
.



IT IS SO ORDERED



/

Judge’s signature

+


/

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

 Southern District of Alabama

Terrance Keoki Callen 06-00176-011

09535-003

4/07/2007

Pro Se

✔

✔

November 5, 2014

United States District Judge

The defendant's original total offense level was derived from the Career Offender provision of the Sentencing

Guidelines, which makes him ineligible for a reduction in sentence due to the 2014 Drug Guidelines Amendment.

Callie V.S. Granade 

U.S. District Judge

Digitally signed by Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge 

DN: cn=Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge, o=U.S. 

Government, ou=Federal Judiciary, 

email=efile_granade@alsd.uscourts.gov, c=US 

Date: 2014.11.05 12:47:08 -06'00'

Case 2:06-cr-00176-CG-N Document 939 Filed 11/05/14 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       6
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
June 30, 2000 Form 10-Q Balance  Sheets and  Statements  of  Operations  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                     35,599
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                    33,885
<RECEIVABLES>                                239
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                11
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            34,135
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                       0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                        0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    154
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                          154
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                       0
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                        222
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        222
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                      0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                         0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                        0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                       0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                  (1,877)
<NET-ASSETS>                              33,981
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                              0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                          1,265
<OTHER-INCOME>                               403
<EXPENSES-NET>                               602
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                    1,066
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                      (7)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                     47
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                      1,106
<EQUALIZATION>                                 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                      0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                          0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                        0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                    0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                            0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                     1,106
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                        0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                      0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                        0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                     0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        333
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              602
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                      33,428
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                     146.74
<PER-SHARE-NII>                             3.87
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                     0.18
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                           0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                      0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                           0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                       150.79
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                            0.018


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32


            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE & FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of CLX
Energy, Inc. for the quarter ended in June 30, 2004, I, Shane H. Traveller,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of CLX Energy, Inc., hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

     (1)  such  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of CLX Energy, Inc. for the
          quarter  ended  June  30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
          section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
          CLX Energy, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, fairly presents,
          in  all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition and results of
          operations  of  CLX  Energy,  Inc.

                                 /s/  Shane  H.  Traveller
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Shane  H.  Traveller,  Chief  Executive Officer
                                 and Chief Financial Officer


Date: August 12, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CLX Energy, Inc. and will be retained by CLX Energy, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
                                   Exhibit 32


            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE & FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of CLX
Energy, Inc. for the quarter ended in June 30, 2004, I, E. J. Henderson,
President of CLX Energy, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge, that:

     (1)  such  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of CLX Energy, Inc. for the
          quarter  ended  June  30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
          section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
          CLX Energy, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, fairly presents,
          in  all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition and results of
          operations  of  CLX  Energy,  Inc.

                                 /s/  E.  J.  Henderson
                                 ----------------------
                                 E.  J.  Henderson,  President


Date: August 12, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CLX Energy, Inc. and will be retained by CLX Energy, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 20, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20053 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EPIFANIO ENRIQUEZ-GUEVARA, also known as Heriberto Gil Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-343-1

-------------------- Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Epifanio Enriquez-Guevara (Enriquez) pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation following conviction for an aggravated felony and was sentenced to 46 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Enriquez argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. This argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Enriquez contends thatNo. 05-20053 -2- Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Enriquez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. Enriquez also argues that the district court erred by ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release. This claim is not ripe for review on direct appeal. See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu , 428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Jan. 9, 2006)(No. 05-8662). The claim is dismissed. See id. at 1102. JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.
#### Claude Linden ROSE, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Jack LEE, Superintendent, Middle River Regional Jail, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 07-7014.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 13, 2007.

Decided: Dec. 19, 2007.

Claude Linden Rose, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Claude Linden Rose seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial *549of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rose has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Rose’s motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and ai’gument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*