alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  FOR PPL CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2003

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Corporation (the
  "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I, the principal
  executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

| | · | The Covered Report fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                             
| | · | The information contained in the Covered
        Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.





|Date: August 12, 2003 | /s/ William F. HechtWilliam F. Hecht
        Chairman, President and
        Chief Executive Officer
        PPL Corporation
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1941

VICTORIA A. JEDROWICZ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GIANT FOOD INC.,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

FRANK PODGORSKI, Store Manager, in his official capacity; KEVIN LONG, Assistant Store

Manager, in his official capacity,

Defendants.

No. 01-1133

VICTORIA A. JEDROWICZ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GIANT FOOD INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee,
2

and

ROYAL AHOLD; J. SAINSBURY (USA) HOLDINGS,

INCORPORATED; PETER MANOS, in his official

capacity; BRIAN KAMISCINSKI, District Manager

in his official capacity; FRANK PODGORSKI,

Store Manager in his official capacity,

Defendants.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-96-3562-WMN, CA-98-3899-WMN)

Submitted: June 22, 2001 Decided: July 9, 2001

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jo Ann P. Myles, Largo, Maryland, for Appellant. Robert G. Ames,

Connie N. Bertram, VENABLE, BAETJER, HOWARD & CIVILETTI, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Victoria A. Jedrowicz appeals

district court orders entered in the course of her litigating two

complaints against Giant Foods, Incorporated. In No. 00-1941, we

have reviewed the record and the district court orders and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Jedrowicz v. Giant Food, Inc., No. CA-96-3562-

WMN (D. Md. June 7, 2000). Likewise, in No. 01-1133, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jedrowicz v.

Giant Food, Inc., No. CA-98-3899-WMN (D. Md. Dec. 21, 2000). In

No. 01-1133, we grant Appellee’s motion to file an attachment. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
        32
 
 CHEMBIO
        DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
 SARBANES-OXLEY
        ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION
 
 In
        connection with this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Chembio Diagnostics,
        Inc.
        (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, each of the
        undersigned, Lawrence A. Siebert, the Chief Executive Officer, President
        and
        Chairman of the Company, and Richard J. Larkin, the Chief Financial Officer
        of
        the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
              This
                  Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies
                  with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange
                  Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
              The
                  information contained in this Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
                  December 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
                  financial
                  condition and results of operations of Chembio Diagnostics, Inc.
                  for the
                  periods presented therein.
 
 Date:
        March 28, 2007
 
 /s
        /
        Lawrence A. Siebert
 Lawrence
        A. Siebert
 Chief
        Executive Officer, President and Chairman
 (Principle
        Executive Officer)
  /s./
        Richard J. Larkin
 Richard
        J. Larkin
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 (Principle
        Financial Officer)
Pursuan t to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D),

this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT : ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE : CHR IS M. TEAGLE GREGORY F. ZOELLER Muncie, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana
RICHARD C. WEBSTER Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana


## IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

ADAM J. SMITH, ) ) Appellant

- Defendant, ) ) vs. ) No. 05 A 0 5

- 1301

- CR

- 41 ) STATE OF INDIANA, ) ) Appellee

- Plaintiff. )

APPEAL FROM THE BLACKFORD SUPERIOR COURT The Honorable John Nicholas Barry , Judge Cause No. 05D01

- 1109

- FD

- 384

July 3, 201 3 MEMORANDUM DECISION
- NOT FOR PUBLICATION GARRARD, Senior Judge

### 2

As the result of a plea agreement Adam J. Smith pled guilty to theft, a class D felony. He was sentenced to three years with one year suspended. Later the court granted Smith’s motion for reduction or suspension of sentence, and Smith was placed on proba tion for the remainder of his sentence under the court’s rules of probation. Several
months later the S tate filed a petition to revoke probation, and after a hearing the court revoked Smith’s probation and ordered that the entire portion of his sentence o f 675 days, less 4 days ’ credit time for a total of 671 days, be executed. Smith now appeals from the
revocation.
Smith contends that his sentence should be revised in accordance with Indiana Appellate Rule 7, to

- wit: the sentence is “inappropriate in li ght of the nature of the offense and the character of the offender.” However, our supreme c ourt has established
that Indiana Appellate Rule 7 review is not applicable when reviewing a trial court’s action in a probation violation proceeding. Jones v. Sta te , 885 N.E.2d 1286, 1290 (Ind. 2008); Prewitt v. State , 878 N.E.2d 184, 187

- 88 (Ind. 2007). Instead, in such proceedings we only review for abuse of discretion. Prewitt , 878
N.E.2d at 188. We will affirm the trial court unless its decision is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances before the court. Guillen v. State , 829
N.E.2 d 142, 145 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005), trans. denied

. Applying that standard we fin d no error in the court’s decision. The court expressly found that Smith used marijuana during the period in violation of the rules of probation and, also, failed to com ply with the terms of his court

- ordered day reporting

### 3

administered through Blackford C ounty Community Corrections. The evidence produced at the hearing supports both of those findings. We cannot say the decision was clearly against the logic and effect of the circumstances. These were not simply very minor
technical violations of the rul es. The decision is therefore affirmed. BAKER, J., and BARNES, J., concur.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00699-CR

Kerstin Preis Jones

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

377th District Court of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 12-6-26719-D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 28, 2014
EXHIBIT 8.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF MATERIALISE NV



|                                   |  |                              
|---------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name                               |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Materialise France SAS             |  | France                       
|Materialise GmbH                   |  | Germany                      
|Materialise Japan K.K.             |  | Japan                        
|Materialise Czech Republic SRO     |  | The Czech Republic           
|Materialise USA, LLC               |  | USA  Michigan               
|Materialise UK Limited             |  | United Kingdom               
|OBL SAS                            |  | France                       
|Materialise Austria GmbH           |  | Austria                      
|Mobelife NV                        |  | Belgium                      
|Materialise Malaysia SDN. Bhd.     |  | Malaysia                     
|Materialise Ukraine LLC            |  | Ukraine                      
|RapidFit NV                        |  | Belgium                      
|RapidFit, LLC                      |  | USA  Michigan               
|Materialise SA                     |  | Poland                       
|Meridian Technique Ltd.            |  | United Kingdom               
|Orthoview LLC                      |  | USA  Delaware               
|OrthoView Holdings Ltd.            |  | United Kingdom               
|Meridian (Corporate Trustees) Ltd. |  | United Kingdom               
|OrthoView Ltd.                     |  | United Kingdom               
|Materialise Colombia SAS           |  | Colombia                     
|RSPRINT NV                         |  | Belgium                      
|Materialise Shanghai Co. Ltd.      |  | China                        
|Cenat BVBA                         |  | Belgium                      
|Materialise Metal BVBA             |  | Belgium                      
|Elbimmo NV                         |  | Belgium
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,478,020
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,142,865
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,240,345
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,167,300
<PP&E>                                      75,703,933
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,197,536
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              72,099,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,862,825
<BONDS>                                     17,266,807
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,614,029
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,355,555
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                72,099,216
<SALES>                                     23,594,686
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,594,686
<CGS>                                       20,776,632
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,776,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               408,490
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             540,593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,894,529
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,757
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,856,772
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,856,772
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-05-00204- CR

Ce dr ic Je r om e Di xo n, A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF BELL CO UNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 56688 , HO NORAB LE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Ap pe lla nt C e dr ic Jer ome Di xon w a s c on vic te d o f a g g ra vate d ro bb e ry fo llo wi nghis plea of g uilty
. See T e x . P e n . C o d e A n n . § 2 9
. 0 3 ( W e s t 2 0 0 3 )
. T h e c o urt s e n t e n c e d

h i mt o tw e n tyfive y ear s in prison.

Dix on’s cour

t-appointed attorney

filed a brief concluding that the appea l is frivolous and without mer it. The brief meets the re quirements of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by pr e s e n t i n g a

p r o f e s s i o n a l e v a l u a t i o no f

th e r e c o r d

d e m o n s tr a t i n g w h y

th e r e ar e n o a rg uable g rounds to be adva

nced. Se e als o Pe ns on v . O hio , 48 8 U .S. 75 (1 98 8) ; Hi gh v . S tate , 573 S.W .2d 80 7 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tate , 51 6 S.W. 2d 68 4 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 74 ); Jack son v. Sta te , 4 85 S.W. 2d

55 3 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 72 ); Ga ino us v . S tate , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Dixon receive d a copy of counse l’s brief a

nd was a dvised of his right t o ex am ine the appellate rec ord and to file a pro se br ief. No pr o se brief has bee n filed.2 We have r eviewe d the re cord a nd counsel’s br ief a

nd ag ree that the a

p p e a l is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arg uably support the appe al. Counsel’s motion to wit hdrawis gr anted.

The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

_____________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _______________ Be a Ann Smith, J ustice Be fore J ustices B . A. Smith, P ury ear and Pember

ton Affir med Filed: September

15, 2005 Do No t Pu

bli sh
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C.** **§1350**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and in connection with the annual report of Cytomedix, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, I, Andrew S.
      Maslan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to the
      best
      of my knowledge and belief:




1. The
      Company’s Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934; and




2. The
      information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company for said period.




*/s/Andrew
      S. Maslan*


Andrew
      S.
      Maslan




Chief
      Financial Officer


Date:
      November 14, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement has been provided to Cytomedix, Inc. and
      will
      be retained by Cytomedix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Pacer International, Inc. (the Company),
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Donald C. Orris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Lawrence C. Yarberry,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Donald C. Orris    
|Donald C. Orris        
|Chief Executive Officer
|February 24, 2006      



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Lawrence C. Yarberry
|Lawrence C. Yarberry    
|Chief Financial Officer 
|February 24, 2006       



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pacer International, Inc. and will be retained by Pacer International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Joseph P. Hothhouse III et al., Petitioners, v Village of Otisville, Respondent.

[824 NYS2d 908]

Proceeding pursuant to EDPL 207 to review a determination of the Village of Otisville, dated September 1, 2005, made after a public hearing, to condemn a portion of the petitioners’ property.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, with costs.

A proceeding for judicial review of the condemnation of real property must be commenced “within thirty days after the condemnor’s completion of its publication of its determination and findings” (EDPL 207 [A]). Here, a synopsis of the findings and determination was published in the Times Herald Record on September 15 and 16, 2005. Since the petition was not filed until October 18, 2005, the proceeding must be dismissed as untimely *(see Matter of 922-932 W. Beech Corp. v City of Long Beach,*253 AD2d 465 [1998]; *Matter of Turner v State of N.Y. Dept. of Transp.,*97 AD2d 628 [1983]). Florio, J.P., Miller, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2253 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Integrated 

Activities for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food 

and Agriculture, Integrated Activities for fiscal year 

2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2253 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, NA3 TIONAL INSTITUTE OF FOOD AND AGRI4 CULTURE, INTEGRATED ACTIVITIES FOR FIS5 CAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for US Department of Agriculture, National Institute 

9 of Food and Agriculture, Integrated Activities for fiscal 

10 year 2024 may not exceed $38,000,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2340 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2340

  To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Bilateral 
Economic Assistance, Development Credit Authority for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Bilateral 
Economic Assistance, Development Credit Authority for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR BILATERAL ECONOMIC 
              ASSISTANCE, DEVELOPMENT CREDIT AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 
              2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Bilaterial Economic 
Assistance, Development Credit Authority for fiscal year 2024 may not 
exceed $55,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 245 (Monday, December 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 76343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29838]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group; Subcommittee I--Transition to Independence.
    Date: February 24-25, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Alexandria Old Town, 1767 King Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314.
    Contact Person: Sergei Radaev, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Resources and Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Cancer Institute, NIH 9609 Medical Center 
Drive, Room 7W634, Bethesda, MD 20892-9750, 240-276-6466, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#96e5e4f7f2f7f3e0d6fbf7fffab8f8fffeb8f1f9e0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f98a8b989d989c8fb994989095d7979091d79e968f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/irg/irg.htm, where an 
agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: December 17, 2014.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-29838 Filed 12-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>