alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                         5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from Angeles
Partners X 2000  Third  Quarter  10-QSB  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                             0000317900
<NAME>                            Angeles Partners X
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1,000


<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                407
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          91
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                              9,766
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (6,971)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      3,615
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                             8,672
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                         (5,386)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        3,615
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    1,859
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    1,891
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (32)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (1.72)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         383,080
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,188
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               484,482
<PP&E>                                       5,778,044
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,075,301
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,187,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,611
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,083,614
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,187,225
<SALES>                                      1,251,760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,269,382
<CGS>                                          895,786
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  895,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               209,846
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                163,750
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            163,750
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   163,750
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    27.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    27.29
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 15.1  Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-129271) of ABB Ltd pertaining to the ABB
Employees Share Acquisition Plan  U.S Share Acquisition Sub-Plan of ABB Ltd of
our reports dated March 9, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of ABB Ltd and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of ABB Ltd included in its Annual Report (Form 20-F)
for the year ended December 31, 2008.  /s/ Ernst & Young AG  Zürich,
Switzerland March 9, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1919

CHARLES PILGER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

D. M. BOWMAN, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:10-cv-00597-WDQ)

Submitted: May 26, 2013 Decided: May 31, 2013

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas S. Gill, THOMAS S. GILL, P.C., Frederick, Maryland, for 

Appellant. Stanley J. Reed, Julie A. Reddig, LERCH, EARLY & 

BREWER, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Pilger appeals the district court’s orders: 

(1) entering summary judgment for Defendant on Pilger’s Family 

Medical Leave Act (FMLA) claim; and (2) entering judgment for 

Defendant in accordance with a jury’s verdict on Pilger’s claim 

that he was terminated from employment in violation of the Age 

Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). We affirm.

With respect to Pilger’s claim of a violation of the 

FMLA, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. 

Pilger v. D.M. Bowman, Inc., No. 1:10-cv-00597-WDQ (D. Md. July 

3, 2011).

We reject Pilger’s claim that the district court erred 

in instructing the jury as to liability under the ADEA. A 

district court is “necessarily vested with a great deal of 

discretion in constructing the specific form and content of jury 

instructions.” Hardin v. Ski Venture, Inc., 50 F.3d 1291, 1293 

(4th Cir. 1995). “Instructions will be considered adequate if 

construed as a whole, and in light of the whole record, they 

adequately inform the jury of the controlling legal principles 

without misleading or confusing the jury to the prejudice of the 

objecting party.” Rowland v. Am. Gen. Fin., Inc., 340 F.3d 187, 

191 (4th Cir. 2003) (internal quotation marks and alterations 

omitted). “We review challenges to jury instructions for abuse 
3

of discretion.” Id. Flawed jury instructions will not result 

in reversal absent a showing that the error seriously prejudiced 

the challenging party. Id.

Here, we discern no abuse of discretion in the court’s 

instructions, which, when considered in their entirety, fully 

and correctly informed the jury of the applicable law and were 

neither misleading nor confusing. In particular, there was no 

error in instructing the jury that Pilger had to prove that his 

age was “the reason” that he was fired. See Gross v. FBL Fin. 

Servs., Inc., 557 U.S. 167, 176 (2009) (stating that in ADEA 

cases, the plaintiff must show that “age was the ‘reason’ that 

the employer decided to act”). 

We accordingly affirm. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2300 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2300

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
 State, Administration of Foreign Affairs, Office of Inspector General 
                         for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
 State, Administration of Foreign Affairs, Office of Inspector General 
                         for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 
              ADMINISTRATION OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR 
              GENERAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of State, 
Administration of Foreign Affairs, Office of Inspector General for 
fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $90,829,000.
                                 <all>
```
EX - 10.1 K. Sinatra EA






Exhibit 10.1
FOURTH Amendment to
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This FOURTH Amendment to EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is entered into as of the 27th day of April, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Wynn Resorts, Limited (“Employer”) and Kim Sinatra (“Employee”).  Capitalized terms that are not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement (as defined below).




RECITALS


WHEREAS, Employer and Employee have entered into that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2007, as amended (the "Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, Employer is willing and Employee desires to modify certain terms and conditions to the Agreement as more fully set forth herein; 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the respective representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set forth in this Amendment, the parties hereto agree as follows:
		
	1.
	 Amendments.  Employer and Employee hereby agree to amend Section 1(h)(B) of the Agreement in its entirety to read as follows:


“(B) the bonus that was paid to Employee under Subparagraph 8(b) for the preceding bonus period, projected over the remainder of the Term (but not less than the preceding bonus that was paid), plus”
		
	2.
	Other Provisions of Agreement.  The parties acknowledge that the Agreement is being modified only as stated herein, and agree that nothing else in the Agreement shall be affected by this Amendment.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed and effective as of the date first written above.


	
			
	WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED    
	 
	EMPLOYEE

	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Matt Maddox
	 
	/s/ Kim Sinatra

	Matt Maddox, President    
	 
	Kim Sinatra
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00463

- CV
In Re J. Galvan, Annuitant
On Appeal from the County Court at Law of Kleberg County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 14

- 231

- C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, con cludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant s, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMP ANY AND METROPOLITAN INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY

. We furth er order this decision certified below for observance. October 2, 2014
Mic higan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, cer tify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk May 25, 2011

d0525 

# Order

May 25, 2011

141977(84)

ENGENIUS, INC. and ENGENIUS

- EU,

LIMITED,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 141977

COA: 290682

Wayne CC: 03

- 331133

- CK

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of t he Court, the motion to partially confirm judgment is considered, and

it is DENIED, because this Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief

at this time.
**Exhibit 13.2**

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-Ffor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 of ABB Ltd (the “Company”) asfiled with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) onthe date hereof (the “Report”) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,Michel Demaré, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that:

(1)         the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)         theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| By:    | /s/ MICHEL DEMARÉ |                    |
|--------|------------------------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:                  | Michel Demaré      |   |
|   | Title:                 | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

Date: April 19, 2006

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. §  1350 and is not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability ofthat section. The foregoing certification will not be deemed to be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to ABBLtd and will be retained by ABB Ltd and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7698

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSE PENALOZA RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-99-287, CA-01-299-1)

Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 27, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Penaloza Rodriguez, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Hale Levin,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* In addition to the claims he raised in the district court,

on appeal Rodriguez alleges prosecutorial misconduct and breach of

his plea agreement. Because he failed to present these claims to

the district court, we decline to address them. Muth v. United

States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993) (holding that claims raised

for the first time on appeal will not be considered absent

exceptional circumstances).

2

PER CURIAM:

Jose Penaloza Rodriguez seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court.* United States v. Rodriguez, Nos. CR-99-287; CA01-229-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 20, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth King, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 693]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), dated April 18, 2012, as, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly designated the defendant a level three sex offender. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly determined that the assessment of 15 points under risk factor 11, based on a history of drug or alcohol abuse, was supported by clear and convincing evidence *(see*Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 15 [2006]; *People v Geehreng,*101 AD3d 975 [2012]; *People v Fryer,*101 AD3d 835 [2012]; *People v Finizio,*100 AD3d 977, 978 [2012]). Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-73616) and on Form S-8 (File No's.
333-39802 and 333-57536) of Handspring, Inc. of our report dated July 16, 2002,
except as to Note 10, as to which the date is September 18, 2002, relating to
the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this
Form 10-K.


/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
September 25, 2002
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Jonathan Stern, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Register.com, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: March 11, 2004                                 By: /s/ Jonathan Stern
                                                         -------------------
                                                         Jonathan Stern
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2193 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Environmental 

Protection Agency, Buildings and Facilities for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 

the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, Agriculture, and 

Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Environmental Protection Agency, Buildings and Facilities 

for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2193 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 

3 BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES FOR FISCAL 

4 YEAR 2024. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

6 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail7 able for Environmental Protection Agency, Buildings and 

8 Facilities for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

9 $34,467,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit
32(a)


CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


FOR PPL
CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Corporation (the
"Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I,
the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that:





·
    The
      Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and·
    The
      information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.











Date:
      November 3, 2005
    /s/ William
      F.
      Hecht
      William
      F. Hecht
      Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
      PPL
      Corporation





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.