alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

JOHN CHARLIE PEARSON,et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

vs. ) Civil Action No.: 05-0056-BH-C

)

LINDEN LUMBER COMPANY, )

INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to

the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to

which objection is made, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated March 21, 2006, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this

Court.

DONE this 13th day of April, 2006.

 

s/ W. B. Hand

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00056-BH-C Document 83 Filed 04/13/06 Page 1 of 1
EX-10.12



 Exhibit 10.12 

FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO

 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) to that certain Employment Agreement between Seres Therapeutics, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (together with any successor thereto, the “Company”), and Michele Trucksis, Ph.D., M.D. (the “Executive”) dated as of June 13, 2015 (the “Employment Agreement”) is
made as of August 7, 2015 (the “Amendment Date”), by and among the Company and the Executive. 
 WITNESSETH 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the terms of the Employment Agreement as set forth herein. 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and the
Executive hereby agree to the following: 
 1. Amendment to the Employment Agreement. Effective as of the Amendment Date,
Section 4(b)(i) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
 (i) an
amount in cash equal to the Annual Base Salary, payable in the form of salary continuation in regular installments over the 12-month period following the date of Executive’s Separation from Service (the “Severance Period”) in
accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices; 
 2. No Other Amendment. Except as expressly set forth in this First
Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and shall continue in full force and effect according to its terms. 
 3.
Counterparts. This First Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one document. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment as of the Amendment Date. 

 

			
	 SERES THERAPEUTICS, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Roger J. Pomerantz

	 Name: Roger J. Pomerantz

	 Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

	
	 EXECUTIVE

	
	 /s/ Michele Trucksis

	 Michele Trucksis, Ph.D., M.D.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2170 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. Department 

of Interior, National Park Service, Centennial Challenge for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. 

Department of Interior, National Park Service, Centennial Challenge for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, NATIONAL 

5 PARK SERVICE, CENTENNIAL CHALLENGE 

6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for U.S. Department of Interior, National Park ServVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:15 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2170.IH H2170

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2170 IH

1 ice, Centennial Challenge for fiscal year 2024 may not ex2 ceed $15,000,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2313 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2313

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
  State, International Commissions, American Sections, International 
                   Commissions for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
  State, International Commissions, American Sections, International 
                   Commissions for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 
              INTERNATIONAL COMMISSIONS, AMERICAN SECTIONS, 
              INTERNATIONAL COMMISSIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of State, 
International Commissions, American Sections, International Commissions 
for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $13,258,000.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

DAYMON BURTON, by his mother :

Mary Ann Carter,

:

Plaintiff,

:

v. CA 15-00207-C

:

LEPOLEAN PETERSON, individually 

and in his official capacity as Principal :

at A.L. Johnson High School,

:

Defendant.

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, 

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Motion to Remand (doc. 7) be and the same 

hereby is GRANTED, and, as such, this case be REMANDED to the Circuit Court of 

Marengo County, Alabama, from whence it came.

DONE this the 23rd day of June 2015.

 s/WILLIAM E. CASSADY 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-00207-C Document 13 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2





Certification Pursuant To


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant To


Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002








In connection with the Yearly Report Amendment of China Yida Holding, Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Yongxi Lin, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results of operations of the Company.








/s/  Yongxi Lin


Yongxi Lin


Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer








Dated: July 26, 2012
EX-10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 

Confidential 
 AMENDMENT
AGREEMENT NO. 2 
 This Amendment Agreement No. 2 (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 17th day of
June 2015, by and between SoftBank Corp., a Japanese corporation (“Softbank”), and Yahoo! Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Yahoo!”) to amend that certain Joint Venture Agreement, dated as of April 1, 1996 (the “Original
Joint Venture Agreement”), by and between Softbank and Yahoo!, as amended by that certain Amendment Agreement, dated September 17, 1997 (the “First Amendment”), by and between Softbank and Yahoo! (as amended, the “Joint
Venture Agreement”). Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Joint Venture Agreement. 

WHEREAS, Section 1(a) of the First Amendment amended Section 6 of the Original Joint Venture Agreement in its entirety; 

WHEREAS, Softbank and Yahoo! now desire further to amend Section 6 of the Joint Venture Agreement to reflect certain agreed changes to
the structure and composition of the Board of Directors of Yahoo! Japan Corporation, a Japanese corporation (the “Company or Yahoo! Japan”); 

NOW, THEREFORE, in exchange for good and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, Softbank and Yahoo! hereby
agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Amendment of Joint Venture Agreement 

 Section 6 of the Joint Venture Agreement is
hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
  

	 	“6.	Board of Directors 

   The Board of
Directors of the Company shall be elected pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company and applicable laws of Japan. Softbank and Yahoo! agree to vote their shares so as to elect two Softbank representatives and two Yahoo!
representatives to the Board of Directors of the Company, so long as the party so represented continues to hold at least 5% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares. Softbank and Yahoo! further agree that the authorized number of
directors will be set at 9, and that they will not vote to increase or decrease the authorized number of directors without each other’s consent.” 
  

	 	2.	Remainder of Joint Venture Agreement 

 Except as expressly amended hereunder, all of
the terms of the Joint Venture Agreement remain in full force and effect. 








	 	3.	Governing Law; Counterparts 

 This Amendment shall be governed and construed in
accordance with the laws of Japan. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, which together shall constitute one document and be binding on both of the parties hereto. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date
first above written. 
  
  

									
	YAHOO! INC.	  		 	 SOFTBANK CORPORATION
					
	By:	 	/s/ Ronald S. Bell                       	  	             	 	 By:	 	/s/ Masayoshi Son  


									
					
	Name:	 	Ronald S. Bell                       	  	             	 	Name:	 	Masayoshi Son  


									
					
	Title:	 	General Counsel and Secretary	  	             	 	Title:	 	Chairman & CEO


  
 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Walsh, Appellant.

[829 NYS2d 119]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered December 20, 2004, convicting him of assault in the second degree (two counts), endangering the welfare of a child (three counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the Supreme Court deprived him of his right to present a defense and to confront a witness as to an alleged incident between the witness and the complainant is without merit. The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in limiting the cross-examination of the prosecution witness, who was the complainant’s mother, about the alleged incident. The excluded line of questioning, by which the defendant attempted to establish that the witness had a motive to fabricate her testimony because she was afraid that the complainant would physically harm her, was too remote and speculative, lacking in factual basis *(see People v Hoover,*298 AD2d 599 [2002]; *People v DaCosta,*201 AD2d 402 [1994]). Goldstein, J.P., Spolzino, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1869 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of 

Representatives, Office of the Speaker for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House 

of Representatives, Office of the Speaker for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, OFFICE OF 

5 THE SPEAKER FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for House of Representatives, Office of the Speaker 

9 for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $7,123,634. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT
32.1
 Certification
Pursuant To
 18
U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant To
 Section
906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002
   In
connection with the Yearly Report of China Yida Holding, Co. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Chen Minhua, Chief
Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results
of operations of the Company.
   /s/  Chen
Minhua
 Chen
Minhua
 Chief
Executive Officer
  Dated:
March 31, 2009
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

TO THE 216TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF KERR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on February 11, 2015, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

Devon Alexander Kane, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04-14-00006-CR and Tr. Ct. No. A1321

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgments of the

trial court are AFFIRMED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas,

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on June 19, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
[Cite as State v. Charbeneau , 2015-Ohio-4532.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2015-05-082

: D E C I S I O N - vs - 11/2/2015 : MICHAEL L. CHARBENEAU, : Defendant-Appellant. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CR2014-02-0257

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for plaintiff-appellee Fred S. Miller, Baden & Jones Bldg., 246 High Street, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for defendantappellant

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel. {¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Michael L. Charbeneau, has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1)Butler CA2015-05-082 indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the tr ial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to wit hdraw as counsel is grant ed, and this a ppeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

PIPER, P.J., RINGLAND and HENDRICKSON, JJ., concur.
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the 1999 Long-Term
Incentive Plan, the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc., of our report dated October 24, 2000 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc. included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2000.

ERNST &
YOUNG LLP

San
Diego, California
December 20, 2000

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 99.2



BANK ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION



Annual Officers Certificate of the Servicer

Pursuant to Section 3.09(a) of the

Pooling and Servicing Agreement



The undersigned, duly authorized representatives of Bank
One, National Association, as servicer (the Servicer), pursuant to Section 3.09(a) of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 31, 1999 (the Agreement) between Banc One ABS Corporation, as depositor (the
Depositor), the Servicer and The Bank of New York, as trustee (the Trustee), do hereby certify as follows:



| | (1) | All terms used herein that are defined in the Agreement shall have the meanings provided in the Agreement, unless otherwise defined herein.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The undersigned are officers of the Servicer who are duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2003 (the Servicing Period) and of its performance under the Agreement
has been made under our supervision.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of our knowledge, fulfilled all of its material obligations under the Agreement throughout the Servicing Period except as set
forth in paragraph (5) below.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (5) | The following is a brief description of each default in the fulfillment of the Servicers obligations under the Agreement known to us to have been made by the Servicer during
the Servicing Period, which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each such default and (ii) the current status of each such default: None.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Servicer has caused this Certificate to be executed by the undersigned duly authorized officers as
of December 31, 2003.



BANK ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS SERVICERBy:

/s/    RANDY J. REDCAYName: Randy J. Redcay Title: First Vice PresidentBy:

/s/    KIM D. GREAVESName: Kim D. Greaves Title: Senior Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 223 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 223

To amend title V of the Social Security Act to require assurances that 
  certain family planning service projects and programs will provide 
   pamphlets containing the contact information of adoption centers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

 Mr. Wittman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title V of the Social Security Act to require assurances that 
  certain family planning service projects and programs will provide 
   pamphlets containing the contact information of adoption centers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Adoption Information Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION IN FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES OF PAMPHLETS CONTAINING 
              ADOPTION CENTER CONTACT INFORMATION.

    Title V of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 701 et seq.) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 514. LIMITATION.

    ``(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
title, a grant may be made or contract entered into under section 501 
for a family planning service project or program only upon assurances 
satisfactory to the Secretary that the project or program will--
            ``(1) provide to each person to whom the medical 
        professional provides family planning medical services, at the 
        time the person inquires about medical or abortion services, a 
        pamphlet that contains--
                    ``(A) a comprehensive list of the adoption centers 
                located in the region (as determined by the Secretary) 
                where the adoption services are provided; and
                    ``(B) the address and telephone number of each such 
                center; and
            ``(2) provide each such person an opportunity to read the 
        pamphlet.
    ``(b) Pamphlets.--The Secretary shall prepare, annually update, and 
distribute to each project or program referred to in subsection (a) 
pamphlets described in such subsection.
    ``(c) No Additional Funds.--No funds may be used to carry out this 
section, except funds that are appropriated to carry out this title.''.
                                 <all>
```