alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Plaintiff commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. §405(g) seeking judicial review of a

final decision of the Commissioner denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits.

(Doc. 1). The Commissioner thereafter filed an Answer admitting the material allegations of the

Complaint (doc. 9) and, subsequently, an unopposed motion (doc. 13) to Remand the cause to

the Commissioner under Sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The parties also filed a consent to

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MATTIE FOSTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-00792-N

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner )

of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This action is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion (doc. 26) for an award of

attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,559.16 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act

(EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1), and the response (doc. 26) filed by Defendant Michael J.

Astrue (“Commissioner”) . The Court is advised that the Commissioner will not oppose

plaintiff’s motion and agrees to pay the plaintiff $1,559.16 in attorney fees under the

EAJA The parties filed a consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned as a Magistrate

Judge. (Doc. 22). Upon consideration of all pertinent materials presented, the

undersigned finds that plaintiff is entitled to receive as a reasonable attorney fee for 9.0

hours of legal services rendered by plaintiff’s attorney in this court the amount of

$1,559.16 pursuant to both the EAJA1

 and the Commissioner’s lack of opposition (doc.

Case 2:09-cv-00792-N Document 29 Filed 07/23/10 Page 1 of 2
the jurisdiction of the undersigned as a Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 14). An order and judgment was

then entered by the undersigned on January 15, 2010, wherein the case was reversed and

remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings and the

plaintiff was held to be a prevailing party for purposes of the EAJA. (Docs. 16 and 17). 

2

28). It is, therefore, ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion for an award of attorney’s

fees is hereby GRANTED and the plaintiff hereby awarded attorney’s fees in the amount

of $1,559.16 pursuant to the EAJA as compensation for 9.0 hours of legal services

rendered in this court by her counsel.

Done this 23rd day of July, 2010.

/s/ Katherine P. Nelson 

KATHERINE P. NELSON 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:09-cv-00792-N Document 29 Filed 07/23/10 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-93623), Form S-8 (File No. 333-93625) and
Form S-3 (File No. 333-65730) of Triton PCS Holdings, Inc., and its subsidiaries
of our report dated February 14, 2003, except for Note 16, as to which the date
is February 26, 2003, and Note 17, as to which the date is May 19, 2003 relating
to the financial statements and financial statement schedules, which appears in
this Form 10-K/A.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia Pennsylvania
May 21, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2220 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2220

   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related 
 Agencies, National Gallery of Art, Repair, Restoration and Renovation 
                   of Buildings for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related 
 Agencies, National Gallery of Art, Repair, Restoration and Renovation 
                   of Buildings for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RELATED AGENCIES, 
              NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART, REPAIR, RESTORATION AND 
              RENOVATION OF BUILDINGS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Related Agencies, 
National Gallery of Art, Repair, Restoration and Renovation of 
Buildings for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $24,081,000.
                                 <all>
```
|   | · | The                Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | · | The                information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |

| Date:  November                3, 2006 | /s/  Paul                A.                Farr                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                             | Paul                A. FarrSenior                Vice PresidentPPL                Energy Supply, LLC                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6426

MICHAEL E. ALLEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLARD JOBE, Administrator, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00384-WLO) Submitted: October 18, 2007 Decided: October 24, 2007 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael E. Alley, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Franklin Bryant, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael E. Alley seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Alley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2123 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2123

 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
          Agencies, Working Capital Fund for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
          Agencies, Working Capital Fund for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR INDEPENDENT 
              AGENCIES, WORKING CAPITAL FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Independent Agencies, 
Working Capital Fund for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $4,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32


            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE & FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of CLX
Energy, Inc. for the quarter ended in December 31, 2003, I, E. J. Henderson,
President and Chief Financial Officer of CLX Energy, Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of CLX Energy, Inc. for the quarter
     ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of CLX
     Energy, Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     CLX Energy, Inc.

                              /s/ E. J. Henderson
                              --------------------------------
                              E.J. Henderson, President &
                              Chief Financial Officer


Date:  February 12, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CLX Energy, Inc. and will be retained by CLX Energy, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





<PAGE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0008

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs.

CHELSEA CUMBAA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for an extension of time, and 

good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to 

and including May 7, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file her reply brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

March 31 2020

03/31/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0008
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, J. Frank
Harrison, III, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David V. Singer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    J. FRANK HARRISON, III                                                                        
|                                                                                                     
|J. Frank Harrison, III Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer August 11, 2003



|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DAVID V. SINGER                                                              
|                                                                                    
|David V. Singer Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer August 11, 2003
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2089 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The Judiciary, US 

Sentencing Commission, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The 

Judiciary, US Sentencing Commission, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 THE JUDICIARY, US SENTENCING COMMIS5 SION, SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL 

6 YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for The Judiciary, US Sentencing Commission, SalaVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:01 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2089.IH H2089

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2089 IH

1 ries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $18,953,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           73726
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    66212
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     555768
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6877706
<PP&E>                                            9245
<DEPRECIATION>                                   37853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7837807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           565654
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        245872
<OTHER-SE>                                    10346631
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7837807
<SALES>                                         480480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                480480
<CGS>                                           434365
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   434365
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1413292
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               77911
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1445088)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1445088)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1445088)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2281 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Rural Business—Cooperative Service, Rural Cooperative 

Development Grants for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Rural Business—Cooperative 

Service, Rural Cooperative Development Grants for fiscal 

year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2281 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL 

3 BUSINESS—COOPERATIVE SERVICE, RURAL 

4 COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS FOR 

5 FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for US Department of Agriculture, Rural Business— 

9 Cooperative Service, Rural Cooperative Development 

10 Grants for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $27,600,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GUS JOHNSON,

AIS #108854

Plaintiff, 

:

:

:

:

:

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 15-135-CG-M

:

KIM THOMAS, et. al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo 

determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is 

made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment be 

GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s action be DISMISSED against Defendants, Kim 

Thomas, Cynthia Stewart, Alfie Pacheco, and Calvin Wilson, with prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED this 11th day of February, 2016.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00135-CG-M Document 36 Filed 02/11/16 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marvel Jones, Appellant.

[973 NYS2d 136]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered March 30, 2011, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of attempted assault in the first degree and assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 20 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations. The evidence supports a reasonable inference that defendant cut the victim’s face with a razor blade, as opposed to merely punching her, and that he did so with the intent to cause serious physical injury.

Since defendant made an offer of proof at trial that was completely different from the theory of relevance he asserts on appeal, his claim that the court unduly restricted his cross-examination of the victim is unpreserved *(see People v Brown,*298 AD2d 176 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 556 [2002]). Defendant’s constitutional argument is unpreserved for the same reason, as well as the additional reason that defendant never asserted a constitutional right to pursue the line of inquiry at issue *(see e.g. People v Lane,*7 NY3d 888, 889 [2006]). We decline to review these claims in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal. Defendant was not deprived of his right to cross-examine witnesses and present a defense *(see Crane v Kentucky,*476 US 683, 689-690 [1986]; *Delaware v Van Arsdall,*475 US 673, 678-679 [1986]).

Defendant did not properly preserve his claim that the court erred in delaying its consideration of his request to proceed pro se — asserted for the first time during cross-examination of the victim — until after the victim’s testimony had concluded; in any event, defendant abandoned that claim when, through counsel, defendant withdrew his request to represent himself *(see People v Douglas,*227 AD2d 130 [1st Dept 1996], *lv denied*88 NY2d 965 [1996]).

The record does not establish that defendant’s sentence was based on any improper criteria and we perceive no basis for *494reducing the sentence. Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe, Freedman and Clark, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2291 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2291

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
   of Agriculture, Foreign Assistance and Related Programs, Foreign 
   Agricultural Service, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the 
     Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
   of Agriculture, Foreign Assistance and Related Programs, Foreign 
   Agricultural Service, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR US DEPARTMENT OF 
              AGRICULTURE, FOREIGN ASSISTANCE AND RELATED PROGRAMS, 
              FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE, SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR 
              FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for US Department of 
Agriculture, Foreign Assistance and Related Programs, Foreign 
Agricultural Service, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may 
not exceed $213,890,000.
                                 <all>
```