alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements as of and for the six months ended June 28, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000317540
<NAME>                        COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                         5,518
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  62,848
<ALLOWANCES>                                   528
<INVENTORY>                                    46,536
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,045
<PP&E>                                         443,861
<DEPRECIATION>                                 186,444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 837,011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          157,203
<BONDS>                                        489,068
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       12,055
<OTHER-SE>                                     (37)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   837,011
<SALES>                                        444,746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               444,746
<CGS>                                          255,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  255,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               157,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             18,346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,013
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,086
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,927
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,927
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.82
        


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Humphreys, O’ Brien and Senior Judge Bumgardner

HOWARD CLUTE MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 0252-15-2 PER CURIAM JUNE 9, 2015 BIG LOTS STORES, INC. AND ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Michael J. Beste; Reinhardt Harper Davis, PLC, on brief), for appellant. (Nicholas P. Marrone; Kathryn Lea Harman; Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, on brief), for appellees.
Howard Clute (“claimant”) appeals th e decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (“commission”) declining to awar d him disability benefits from August 19, 2013 and ongoing and by only awarding him disabil ity benefits on August 19, 2013, which was the day of his right knee replacement surgery. On appeal, claimant ar gues the commission erroneously (1) held that he faile d to sustain his burden of proof for an award of temporary total disability from August 19, 2013 and ongoing; and (2) declined to consider his testimony to prove his disability, but instead determined that it co uld only speculate as to a period of disability without medical records. 1 We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.

1 Big Lots Stores, Inc. and Arch Insurance Company argue claimant was not entitled to disability benefits for his right knee on A ugust 19, 2013 because that claim was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We have determined that the commission did no t err in finding that claimant’s claim for benefits for his right knee was not barred by res judicata. See Big Lots Stores, Inc. v. Clute, Record No. 0206-15-2.UNPUBLISHED- 2 - that this appeal is without merit. Accord ingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its opinion. See Clute v. Big Lots Stores, In c., JCN VA00000420654 (Jan. 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument and su mmarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma terials before the Cour t and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         notice that was originally published on December 10, 2014, (Volume 79, Number 237, Page 73404) the meeting location was inadvertently omitted. The location of the meeting is: Atlanta, Georgia.                    

# DATES:

The meetings will be held Thursday, January 15, 2015 and Friday January 16, 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robin Owsley at 1-888-912-1227 or (317) 685-7627.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance Center Improvements Project Committee will be held Thursday, January 15, 2015 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Friday, January 16, 2015, from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time in Atlanta, Georgia. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Notification of intent to participate must be made with Robin Owsley. For more information please contact: Robin Owsley at 1-888-912-1227 or (317) 685-7627or write: TAP Office, 575 N. Pennsylvania, Indianapolis, IN 46204 or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various issues related to services provided by the Taxpayer Assistance Centers. Public input is welcomed.

Dated: December 16, 2014.

Otis Simpson,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2014-29937 Filed 12-22-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOTITLE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Enzo Biochem, Inc., and
Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |                                                                                                                                                           
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |                                                                                                                                                           
| | (2) The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
 the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |  |     |                                                              
|---------------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 12,
 2010 |  | By: | /s/ Elazar
 Rabbani, Ph.D.                                   
|                       |  |     |                                                              
|                       |  |     | Elazar Rabbani,
 Ph.D.                                       
|                       |  |     | Chairman of the
 Board, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary

---
#### Keith W. WORMACK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-2418.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 30, 2001.

Decided May 23, 2001.

Stephen F. Shea, Willoner, Calabrese & Rosen, P.A., College Park, MD, for appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte J. Hardnett, Acting General Counsel, Frank V. Smith, III, Acting Deputy General Counsel, John S. Sacchetti, Associate General Counsel, Ejike H. Obineche, Office of General Counsel, Social Security Administration, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

*161PER CURIAM.

Keith W. Wormack appeals the magistrate judge’s order* entering summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner in Wormack’s action for review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his claim for disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. *See Wormack v. Apfel,*No. CA-00-315-L (D.Md. Sept. 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark R. Rosenzweig, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BTU International,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 19, 2004

                             /s/ Mark R. Rosenzweig
                             ----------------------

                               Mark R. Rosenzweig
                 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
#### Gary Kallem, et al., Appellants, v Thomas Mandracchia, Defendant, and Jackson Hole Diner, Respondent.

[975 NYS2d 690]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Strauss, J.), entered January 17, 2012, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Jackson Hole Diner which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs allege that on October 26, 2009, the plaintiff Gary Kallem (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) was walking on a sidewalk adjacent to property owned by the defendant Jackson Hole Diner when he was struck by a vehicle operated by the defendant Thomas Mandracchia. When the accident occurred, Mandracchia was driving out of the parking lot of the diner, using its driveway and traveling over a portion of the sidewalk where the injured plaintiff was struck.

The injured plaintiff, and his wife suing derivatively, commenced this action against Jackson Hole Diner and Mandracchia to recover damages for their alleged negligence. Jackson Hole Diner moved, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, contending, among *894other things, that it did not owe a duty of care to the injured plaintiff. The Supreme Court granted the motion.

Before a defendant may be held liable for negligence, it must be shown that the defendant owes a duty to the plaintiff (see *Palsgraf v Long Is. R.R. Co.,*248 NY 339, 342 [1928]; *Safa v Bay Ridge Auto,*84 AD3d 1344 [2011]). “Absent a duty running directly to the injured person there can be no liability in damages, however careless the conduct or foreseeable the harm” *(532 Madison Ave. Gourmet Foods v Finlandia Ctr.,*96 NY2d 280, 289 [2001]; *see Safa v Bay Ridge Auto,*84 AD3d 1344 [2011]). Foreseeability, alone, does not define duty — it merely determines the scope of the duty once it is determined to exist *(see Hamilton v Beretta U.S.A. Corp.,*96 NY2d 222, 232 [2001]; *Safa v Bay Ridge Auto,*84 AD3d at 1344). A defendant generally has no duty to control the conduct of third persons so as to prevent them from harming others, even where, as a practical matter, the defendant can exercise such control *(see Hamilton v Beretta U.S.A. Corp.,*96 NY2d at 233; *Safa v Bay Ridge Auto,*84 AD3d at 1344).

Jackson Hole Diner established, prima facie, that it did not owe the injured plaintiff a duty of care to protect him from the conduct of Mandracchia in driving his vehicle out of its parking lot *(see Pulka v Edelman,*40 NY2d 781, 784-785 [1976]; *Safa v Bay Ridge Auto,*84 AD3d 1344 [2011]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly granted that branch of the motion of Jackson Hole Diner which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Mastro, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Composite Technology Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Benton H. Wilcoxon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and


(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the
Company.





Date:
February 9, 2010





/s/
      Benton H WilcoxonBenton
      H WilcoxonChief
      Executive Officer
                  (Principal
      Executive Officer)
Exhibit 31.01

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                       2002 (Rule 13a-14(a) Certification)


I, Jerome K. Thorson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of 3Si
Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date");
and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
Registrant's internal controls; and

6. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                                       By:/s/ Jerome K. Thorson
                                       Jerome K. Thorson, President/CEO
Date:  February  13, 2004
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of BTU
International, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

      3)    the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
            ended July 4, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      4)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company for the periods covered by the Report.

                                        /S/ Thomas P. Kealy
                                        -------------------
                                        Thomas P. Kealy
                                        Vice President, Corporate Controller
                                        and Chief Accounting Officer (principal
                                        financial and accounting officer)


Dated:  August 18, 2004
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of NeuMedia, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 of the Company (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 22, 2011





/s/ Peter AddertonPeter AddertonInterim Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)