alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2125 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, 

Merit Systems Protection Board, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, Merit Systems Protection Board, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES, MERIT SYSTEMS 

5 PROTECTION BOARD, SALARIES AND EX6 PENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Independent Agencies, Merit Systems Protection 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2125 IH

1 Board, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may 

2 not exceed $44,490,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edison Garcia, Appellant.

[972 NYS2d 554]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berk-man, J., at severance motion; Analisa Torres, J., at jury trial and sentencing), rendered November 24, 2010, as amended January 12, 2011, convicting defendant of sexual abuse in the first degree and course of sexual conduct against a child in the second degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of nine years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant did not preserve his challenge to evidence regarding an uncharged incident of improper conduct toward one of the victims, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that any error was harmless *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230 [1975]).

The arresting detective’s brief testimony that he knew certain pedigree information about defendant before the arrest was likewise harmless. The record does not support defendant’s assertion that the prosecutor deliberately elicited this testimony.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s mistrial motion, made when the mother of one of the victims volunteered uncharged crime evidence while being cross-examined by defense counsel. The drastic remedy of a mistrial *531was not warranted, because the curative instruction that the court provided in accordance with defense counsel’s request was sufficient to prevent defendant from being prejudiced *(see People v Santiago, 52*NY2d 865 [1981]).

The court properly exercised its discretion in precluding defendant from inquiring into whether the father of one of the victims raped the mother of the other victim, years before the children were born. The proffered evidence was collateral to the charges that defendant sexually abused the two victims *(see People v Aska,*91 NY2d 979, 981 [1998]), and defendant’s theory of third-party culpability is speculative and meritless *(see People v Gamble,*18 NY3d 386, 398-399 [2012]). Since defendant never asserted a constitutional right to introduce this evidence, his constitutional claim is unpreserved *(see People v Lane,*7 NY3d 888, 889 [2006]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits *(see Crane v Kentucky,*476 US 683, 689-690 [1986]; *Delaware v Van Arsdall,*475 US 673, 678-679 [1986]).

The motion court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s severance motion. The counts were properly joined as “similar in law” pursuant to CPL 200.20 (2) (c), and defendant did not make a sufficient showing to warrant a discretionary severance *(see*CPL 200.20 [3]; *People v Lane,*56 NY2d 1, 8 [1982]; *People v Streitferdt,*169 AD2d 171, 176 [1991], *lv denied*78 NY2d 1015 [1991]). Concur — Acosta, J.P., Saxe, Renwick, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 222 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 222

To direct the Secretary of Energy to require as a condition of any sale 
 of crude oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve that the crude oil 
     not be exported to certain countries, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

 Mr. Wittman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Energy to require as a condition of any sale 
 of crude oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve that the crude oil 
     not be exported to certain countries, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Oil for CCP Act''.

SEC. 2. SPR CRUDE OIL EXPORT BAN.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including section 161 
of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6241), with 
respect to the draw down and sale at auction of any crude oil from the 
Strategic Petroleum Reserve after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Energy, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce 
and the Director of National Intelligence, shall require, as a 
condition of any such sale, that--
            (1) the crude oil not be exported to--
                    (A) the People's Republic of China;
                    (B) the Democratic People's Republic of Korea; or
                    (C) the Islamic Republic of Iran; and
            (2) the recipient is not under the ownership, control, or 
        influence of the Chinese Communist Party.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2003 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2003

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
 Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
     Administration Substance Abuse Treatment for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
 Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
     Administration Substance Abuse Treatment for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 
              AND HUMAN SERVICES, SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL HEALTH 
              SERVICES ADMINISTRATION SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT FOR 
              FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Health and 
Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration Substance Abuse Treatment for fiscal year 2024 may not 
exceed $3,737,556,000.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

**DETERMINE****, INC.**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Determine, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended March 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Nolan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: July 30, 2018

 

| /S/ JOHN NOLAN          |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| John Nolan              |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANTHONY JONES, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 05-0685-CG-C

WILBER JOHNSON, et al., : 

Defendants. :

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be and is hereby

DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

DONE this 9th day of June, 2006.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00685-CG-C Document 11 Filed 06/09/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1

              CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Douglas J. Burdick, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Whole Living, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.



                                /s/ Douglas J. Burdick
Date: April 1, 2005            ____________________________________
                               Douglas J. Burdick
                               Chief Executive Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2064 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Executive Office 

of the President, Executive Residence at the White House, Operating 

Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Executive Office of the President, Executive Residence at the 

White House, Operating Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, EX5 ECUTIVE RESIDENCE AT THE WHITE HOUSE, 

6 OPERATING EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 

7 2024. 

8 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

9 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:04 Apr 18, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2064.IH H2064

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2064 IH

1 able for Executive Office of the President, Executive Resi2 dence at the White House, Operating Expenses for fiscal 

3 year 2024 may not exceed $13,081,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### Mt. Vernon Banking Co. *v.*H. P. Randolph, et al.

Attorney’s Fees — Promissory Notes.

Conditional contracts inserted in the body of promissory notes to pay attorney fees if legal process is resorted to to collect the note are not enforeible.

*693APPEAL PROM HENDERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

April 29, 1876.

*H. F. Turnen, for appellant. Eaves & Prentice, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

In the case of *Thomasson v.*Townsend, 10 Bush 114, this court held that an undertaking of like import with the one embodied in the note here sued on, to wit, “Should the payment of this note be enforced by legal process, the judgment shall include the attorney’s fee for collecting the same,” was inconsistent with the policy of oúr laws.

In that view of the subject such contracts will not be enforced by the courts of this state, no matter where they may have been entered into. It is manifest upon the face of the note that this undertaking constitutes no part of the indebtedness of the obligors to the payee. It is in the nature of a penalty for the non-payment of money, and will be relieved against upon the payment of the principal and interest of the debts. Damages in the way of counsel fees for the breach of contracts were never recoverable at the common law. Sedgwick on Damages, side page 96. Our statutes have changed the common-law rule to the extent of fixing the sums that may be awarded as damages in the way of attorney’s fees. These statutes determine the duty of the courts in this regard. This duty cannot be enlarged or extended by contracts entered into under the laws of the state of Indiana.

We recognize to the fullest extent the rule that the lex loci contractu controls the nature, construction and validity of a contract. But it does not control or in any way affect the remedy allowed in the county'- in which it is in suit; nor does it impose upon the courts of that county the duty of holding valid and enforcible a contract which contravenes the policy of its laws. As we have already seen, the contract under consideration, so far as it contemplates the payment of a greater sum, as an attorney’s fee, than is fixed and allowed by our statutes, is inconsistent with and contrary to the policy of our laws. The legal attorney’s fee was adjudged by the court below, and it properly refused to adjudge a greater sum. Judgment *affirmed.*
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and Form S-3 (No. 333-118241) of CharlotteRusse Holding, Inc. and the related Prospectus of our reports dated November 15, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting of Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 29, 2007. 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

San Diego, California 

November 21, 2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6593

JERRY ALLEN HOLLOWAY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CA-99-27-7)

Submitted: August 17, 1999 Decided: August 31, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Allen Holloway, Appellant Pro Se. Marla Graff Decker, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Allen Holloway seeks to appeal the district court's

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See Holloway v. Angelone, No.

CA-99-27-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 9, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief
executive officer of Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



1) the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 27, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the information
contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 27, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    MARK A. HOFFMANMark A. Hoffman Chief Executive Officer
and Director (Principal Executive Officer)




Date: December 19, 2003



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc. and will be retained by Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Stratabase  on Form  10-KB/A for the
period  ending  December  31,  2002 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Trevor Newton, President, Chief
Executive Officer,  Secretary and Treasurer of Stratabase,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of Stratabase.

/s/  Trevor  Newton
-------------------
Trevor  Newton
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer

Date:  July 23, 2003
EXHIBIT
32.2






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)






In
connection with the Annual Report of Javo Beverage Company, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
Richard A. Gartrell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350),
that to his knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Richard A.
      GartrellRichard
      A. Gartrell
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              January
      13, 2009




[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Javo Beverage Company, Inc. and will be retained by Javo Beverage Company, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]