alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

Certificate of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers

The following statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purposes of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1349), which carries with it certain criminal penalties in the event of a knowing or willful misrepresentation.

Securities
and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549
Re: Andrew Corporation

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In
accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC 1349), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



Dated
as of this 14 day of May 2003.

|/s/RALPH E. FAISONRalph E. Faison
President and Chief Executive Officer |  | /s/CHARLES R. NICHOLASCharles R. Nicholas
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to Andrew Corporation and will be retained by Andrew Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange commission or its staff upon request.

---
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 May 4, 2004
(Date of Report  date of earliest event reported) BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION  Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
    
    001-31524
(Commission File Number)
    
    37-1446709
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)12865 Pointe Del Mar
Suite 200
Del Mar, California
(Address of Principal
Executive Offices)
    
    
    
    92014
(Zip Code)
 (858) 481-8500
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)




---



##### 



Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits.  (c)
    
    Exhibits:  99.1
    
    Press Release issued by Brookfield Homes Corporation on May 4, 2004. Item 12. Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 4, 2004, Brookfield Homes Corporation issued a press release announcing
its earnings and results of operations for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2004. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1. 1




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized. Date: May 10, 2004 BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ PAUL G. KERRIGANPaul G. KerriganExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer 2




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit Number
    
    Exhibit99.1
    
    Press Release issued by Brookfield Homes Corporation on May 4, 2004.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,623,208
<SECURITIES>                                   100,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,552,623
<ALLOWANCES>                                   109,331
<INVENTORY>                                  4,159,477
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,255,521
<PP&E>                                      13,718,047
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,226,161
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,499,858
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,457,311
<BONDS>                                        844,131
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       476,611
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,999,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,499,858
<SALES>                                     13,839,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,839,939
<CGS>                                        6,179,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,826,328
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,876,532
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                19,642
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,849
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,734,816
<INCOME-TAX>                                   586,686
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,148,130
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,148,130
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        

</TABLE>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000468

28-OCT-2019

07:53 AM
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emmanuel GUZMAN-VALENCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-30063.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 15, 2006.*

Filed Sept. 27, 2006.

*22Michelle R. Mallard, USPO — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Pocatello, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kevin Peterson, Blackfoot, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: SILVERMAN and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and RHOADES,** District Judge.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable John S. Rhoades, Sr., Senior United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Guzman-Valencia argues that his sentence of 121 months imprisonment is unreasonable because he “was clearly an addict minor participant,” because he did not profit from the conspiracy, and because his criminal history was minimal.1

At sentencing, the district court rejected Guzman-Valencia’s argument that he was a minor participant in the conspiracy, and we review that factual finding for clear error. *See United States v. Cantrell,*433 F.3d 1269, 1280 (9th Cir.2006). In his brief, Guzman-Valencia points to no evidence in the record indicating that he had a minor role in the offense, and absent some evidence or argument to the contrary we will not hold that the district court clearly erred. We similarly reject Guzman-Valencia’s contention that he did not profit from the conspiracy. There was evidence, based on Guzman-Valencia’s pay stubs, that he quit his job after he became involved in the conspiracy. And Guzman-Valencia provides no evidence or argument in support of his contention that he did not profit from the conspiracy.

Finally, Guzman-Valencia argues that his criminal history was minor, but he did not at the district court, and does not now, challenge the district court’s computation of his criminal history score. The district court properly counted Guzman-Valencia’s criminal history score, and appropriately considered Guzman-Valencia’s criminal history when fashioning his sentence.

The district court correctly calculated the advisory Guidelines range, considered the § 3553(a) factors, and permissibly sentenced Guzman-Valencia at the low end of the Guidelines range. We hold that, in light of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), Guzman-Valencia’s sentence was reasonable. *See United States v. Plouffe,*445 F.3d 1126,1131-32 (9th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history, we will recount it here only to the extent necessary to understand our decision.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1751 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1751

  To amend the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act to include certain 
                  communities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2023

  Mr. Gosar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act to include certain 
                  communities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Downwinders Parity Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION UNDER THE RADIATION EXPOSURE COMPENSATION ACT.

    Section 4(b)(1) of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 
U.S.C. 2210 note; Public Law 101-426) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B)--
                    (A) by striking ``that portion of''; and
                    (B) by striking ``that consists of townships 13 
                through 16 at ranges 63 through 71''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ``all acreage in any 
        county all or part of which is located in'' before ``that 
        part''.

SEC. 3. REPORT.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Attorney General shall submit to the relevant committees of the 
Senate and the House of Representatives a report that outlines efforts 
to educate and conduct outreach to persons made newly eligible for 
benefits under the amendments made by section 2.
                                 <all>
```
#### Homes Leasing Corporation, Respondent, *v. “*Harry ” Eisenstadt and Forty-eight Other Tenants of Premises 124 and 126 East One Hundred and Third Street, Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, Appellants. Homes Leasing Corporation, Respondent, *v. “*Max ” Bloom and Twenty Other Tenants of Premises 122 East One Hundred and Third Street, Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

December 18, 1924.

Trial — verdict — Civil Practice Act, § 467a, does not apply where only issue is amount of unliquidated claim — error to direct verdict.

The court cannot, under section 457a of the Civil Practice Act, direct a verdict where the only issue is the amount of an unliquidated claim, and furthermore it should not have directed a verdict in this case since there were substantial questions of fact involved.

Appeal by defendants from judgments of the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Sixth District, rendered in favor of plaintiff after trials by a judge and jury.

*Samuel Ecker,*for the appellants.

*Nathan D. Stern,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam:

The learned trial court has directed verdicts in these cases upoi the assumption that a verdict for a less amount would have to be set aside as against the weight of evidence. He has granted $ twenty-five per cent increase in rent, making, as he indicates, wha he thought were generous allowances to the tenants to cover al possible questions of fact.

In our opinion the judgments must be reversed and new trials had because section 457a of the Civil Practice Act, if it be con stitutional, cannot under any circumstances apply to actions wher< the only issue is the amount of an unliquidated claim, and then can, therefore, be no *“*contrary *”*verdict. Moreover, substantia questions of fact were involved, both as to the credibility of wit *169nesses and as to the amount of repairs for which allowance has been made.

Judgments reversed and new trial ordered, with fifteen dollars costs to appellants in each appeal.

All concur; present, Bijur, Wagner and Levy, JJ.
FORM 10-Q
                            AMENDMENT #1
                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                      Washington, D.C. 20549

            QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
              OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 1995

Commission File No.  0-9392

                           CLX ENERGY, INC.
         (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

CO                                              84-0749623
(State or other jurisdiction of                 (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                  Identification No.)

1776 Lincoln Street, Suite 806, Denver, CO                     80203
(Address of principal executive offices)                       (Zip code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code    (303) 894-0763

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

                     Yes[X]    No [ ] 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's 
class of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

3,220,821 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value at February 9, 1996.
<PAGE>
                            PART 2 - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

         (a) Exhibits

             Exhibit 27.  Financial Data Schedule

         (b) Reports on Form 8-K
             
             None



                                     SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                               CLX ENERGY, INC.



                                               /s/ E. J. Henderson
                                               By:  E. J. Henderson
                                                    President and Chief
                                                    Financial Officer
Dated:  March 21, 1996
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee*: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Nathan Shock Center.                    

*Date*: January 26, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Garden Inn Bethesda, 7301 Waverly Street, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Bita Nakhai, Ph.D., Scientific Review Branch National Institute on Aging Gateway Bldg. 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-402-7701,                         *nakhaib@nia.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 29, 2014.

Anna Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-30760 Filed 12-31-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                                [PWC LETTERHEAD]

The Board of Directors
Hub International Limited
55 East Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL 60604
U.S.A.

November 5, 2003

Dear Sirs:


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Amendment No. 1 to
the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of our report dated February 28, 2003
relating to the financial statements which appears in HUB International
Limited's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Yours truly,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dale Martin, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 770]

Spain, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Richards, J.), rendered December 19, 2011, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted assault in the second degree.

As part of an agreement resolving charges arising out of numerous incidents, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted assault in the second degree and waived his right to appeal. County Court, in turn, agreed to sentence defendant to a prison term of lVa to 4 years and to direct his enrollment in the shock incarceration program if he successfully continued drug treatment.* Defendant thereafter tested positive for an unprescribed medication and was discharged from the treatment program. *1267County Court nevertheless imposed the initially contemplated prison sentence, and defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Defendant stated during the plea colloquy that he understood his right to appeal and wished to waive it, executed a detailed written waiver, then reiterated at sentencing that he understood that the right to appeal was separate and distinct from the other rights he was giving up *(see People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). Accordingly, we conclude that he knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal *(see People v Bradshaw,*18 NY3d 257, 264 [2011]; *People v Lopez,*6 NY3d at 256; *People v Lopez,*97 AD3d 853, 853 [2012], *lv denied*19 NY3d 1027 [2012]). Inasmuch as County Court adhered to its sentencing commitment, defendant’s valid appeal waiver precludes his sole assertion that the sentence was harsh and excessive *(see People v Lopez,*6 NY3d at 255-256; *People v Koumjian,*101 AD3d 1175, 1175 [2012], *lv denied*20 NY3d 1100 [2013]; *People v Garrand,*100 AD3d 1156, 1157 [2012], *lv denied*20 NY3d 1011 [2013]).

Mercure, J.E, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*

**We note that County Court could recommend but not direct defendant’s enrollment in shock incarceration because he did not plead guilty to a drug offense (see Penal Law § 60.04 [7]); the court’s order in that regard constituted a nonhinding recommendation (see Correction Law § 71 [6]; *Matter of Ferreri v Fischer,*69 AD3d 1014, 1014 [2010], *lv denied*14 NY3d 707 [2010]). Defendant does not claim that this discrepancy rendered his guilty plea involuntary and, in any event, such an argument is not preserved for our review given *1267that the record does not reveal that he moved to withdraw his guilty plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction (see *People v Brown,*58 AD3d 540, 540 [2009], *lv denied*12 NY3d 814 [2009]).
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1

                    CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


TO: Bentley Communications Corp.

As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Bentley Communications Corp. for the year
ended June 30, 2002 of our report dated September 24, 2002 and contained in the
Registration Statement No. 333-100774 of Bentley Communications Corp. Form S-8
under the Securities Act of 1933 insofar as such report relates to the financial
statements of Bentley Communications Corp. for the year ended June 30, 2002.


                                    /s/ RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP
                                        Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP
                                        ----------------------------------------

McLean, Virginia
October 11, 2003
|   | · | The                Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | · | The                information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |

| Date:  August                3, 2006 | /s/  Paul                A.                Farr                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           | Paul                A. FarrSenior                Vice PresidentPPL                Energy Supply, LLC                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
#### In the Matter of Tyleel T., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 234]

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen G. Alpert, J.), entered on or about February 7, 2012, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation. This was the least restrictive dispositional alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the community’s need for protection *(see Matter of Katherine W.,*62 NY2d 947 [1984]). The seriousness of the offense as well as appellant’s unsatisfac*570tory academic, attendance and disciplinary record at school warranted a 12-month period of supervision.

Concur—Tom, J.R, Sweeny, Saxe, Román and Feinman, JJ.