alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE> 1

               SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C.  20549


                          FORM 10-K/A


     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
          For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999


Purpose:  To supplement in part Part IV, Item 14(c) of Company's
          previously filed Form 10-K in order to file as an
          exhibit the Annual Servicing Report of Company's
          Independent Public Accountants.


                  Commission File No. 333-76439

          HOUSEHOLD AUTOMOTIVE TRUST III, SERIES 1999-1
     (Exact name of Registrant as specified in Department
      of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service Form SS-4)


HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION
(Master Servicer of the Trust)
(Exact name as specified in Master Servicer's charter)



            DELAWARE                   Not Applicable.
(State or other jurisdiction of       (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation of Master            Identification Number of
Servicer)                          Registrant)


 2700 SANDERS ROAD, PROSPECT HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS         60070
(Address of principal executive offices of           (Zip Code)
Master Servicer)


    Master Servicer's telephone number, including area code:
                         (847)564-5000


<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2

                              SIGNATURES




     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Master Servicer has duly
caused this report to be signed on behalf of the Household
Automotive Trust III, Series 1999-1 by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.




                               HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION,
                         as Master Servicer of and on behalf of the

                          HOUSEHOLD AUTOMOTIVE TRUST III,
                                        SERIES 1999-1
                                         (Registrant)




Date:  May 5, 2000        By: /s/ J. W. Blenke
                                 J. W. Blenke
                                 Assistant Secretary














<PAGE>
<PAGE> 3



                            Exhibit Index

Exhibit No.    Exhibit

99             Copy of Independent Public Accountants Annual
               Servicing Report dated April April 26, 2000.
#### Jasbir SINGH, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-75815.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 12, 2006.*

Decided June 19, 2006.

Inna Lipkin, Esq., Law Offices of Inna Lipkin, Redwood City, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Ioana Petrou, Esq., U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: KLEINFELD, PAEZ, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jasbir Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal, and request for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence an adverse credibility finding and will uphold the decision unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. *Malhi v. INS,*336 F.3d 989, 992-93 (9th Cir.2003).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s and BIA’s adverse credibility decision because petitioner’s testimony was inconsistent with the documentary evidence he submitted in support of his application. *See Pal v. INS,*204 F.3d 935, 938 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that documents submitted by petitioner that contradict petitioner’s testimony may form the basis for an adverse credibility finding). Accordingly, we deny the asylum claim.

Because Singh failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

Finally, because Singh’s claim under the CAT is based on the same testimony that the IJ found not credible, and he points to no other evidence that he could claim the IJ should have considered in making its determination under CAT, his CAT claim also fails. *See id.*at 1157.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RICK EARL, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : Civil Action No. 14-0498-KD-C

DIEBOLD, INC., et al., :

Defendants.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been 

no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(l)(B) and dated February 5, 2015 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff’s 

motion to remand (doc. 9) is GRANTED and this matter is REMANDED to the Circuit 

Court of Mobile County, Alabama.

DONE this 25th day of February 2015. 

s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:14-cv-00498-KD-C Document 24 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

CARRIE SCOTT and JAMES SCOTT, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10-00186-CG-N 

 ) 

J. PAUL JONES HOSPITAL, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

ORDER 

 After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue 

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. '636(b)(1)(B) and dated May 28, 2010 is ADOPTED

as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (doc. 14) filed by 

Defendants J. Paul Jones Hospital and J. Paul Jones Hospital Board be and is hereby 

GRANTED. 

DONE and ORDERED this 17th day of June, 2010. 

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:10-cv-00186-CG-N Document 23 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

JOHN P. ROGERS, * 

 * 

 Plaintiff, * 

 * 

vs. * CIVIL ACTION 09-00368-WS-B 

 * 

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, * 

Commissioner of * 

Social Security, * 

 * 

 Defendant. * 

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the 

issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge made under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and dated July 26, 2010 is ADOPTED as the 

opinion of this Court. 

DONE and ORDERED this the 4th day of August, 2010. 

 

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:09-cv-00368-WS-B Document 23 Filed 08/04/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.20



 Exhibit 10.20 

Summary of BSPCE Plan 
  Share
warrants for founders, or BSPCEs, entitle a holder to exercise the warrant for the underlying vested shares at an exercise price per share determined by our board of directors and at least equal to the fair market value of an ordinary share on the
date of grant. Share warrants for founders may only be issued by growth companies meeting certain criteria. There is no legal limitation to the size of the share warrant for founders pool under French law. 

Administration. Pursuant to delegations granted at our annual shareholders’ meeting our board of directors determines the recipients, dates
of grant and exercise price of share warrants for founders, the number of share warrants for founders to be granted and the terms and conditions of the share warrants for founders, including the period of their exercisability and their vesting
schedule. 
  Share Warrants for Founders. Our share warrants for founders are generally granted subject to a
vesting schedule providing for twenty-five per cent (25%) at the expiration of one year following the date of grant and the remaining seventy-five per cent (75%) to be vested up to 1/36th per
month as from the anniversary date of grant on expiry of each month. Any warrant which is not exercised before the tenth anniversary of the date of grant will automatically lapse. The term of each share warrant for founders is ten years from the
date of grant. 
 Share warrants for founders are not transferable and may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred or disposed of in any
manner other than by will or by laws of descent or distribution and may be exercised, during the lifetime of the beneficiary, only by the beneficiary. 

Change of Control. Share warrants for founders provide that in the event of a change of control, as defined in the relevant grant
documents unvested warrants will automatically vest in full. 
 Initial Public Offering. The share warrants for founders granted by us
will become immediately exercisable upon completion of our initial public offering.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2089 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2089

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The Judiciary, 
 US Sentencing Commission, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The Judiciary, 
 US Sentencing Commission, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE JUDICIARY, US 
              SENTENCING COMMISSION, SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL 
              YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for The Judiciary, US 
Sentencing Commission, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may 
not exceed $18,953,000.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 12.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONS**

** **

I, Fred Kindle, certify that:

 

# 1.             I havereviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, as amended by this Amendment No. 1on Form 20-F/A, of ABB Ltd;

#  

# 2.             Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

#  

# 3.             Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

#  

# 4.             The company’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

#  

## (a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

##  

## (b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

##  

## (c)           Disclosedin this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

##  

# 5.             Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’sauditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

#  

## (a)           Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

##  

## (b)           Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

----

 
| Date: February 24, 2006 |                     |
|------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                         |                     |
|                         | /s/  FRED KINDLE         |   |
|                         | Fred  Kindle             |
|                         | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

2

----
<PAGE>
Exhibit 23.1


                                     CONSENT

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-52490 and 333-47764) and S-8 (Nos. 333-63902,
333-52488, 333-43220, 333-94817 and 333-92729) of The TriZetto Group, Inc. of
our report dated February 21, 2001 relating to the financial statements as of
December 31, 2000 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31,
2000 and financial statement schedule for each of the two years ended December
31, 2000, which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Orange County, California
February 19, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

Notice is hereby given that, on December 8, 2014, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.* (“the Act”), FieldComm Group, Inc. (“FieldComm”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: FieldComm Group, Inc., Austin, TX. The nature and scope of FieldComm's standards development activities are: To build upon existing technologies and develop a single future vision toward harmonization of standards for the process automation industry worldwide. FieldComm will combine the standards development activity previously conducted under the auspices of the HART® Communication Foundation and the Fieldbus Foundation.

The formal transfer to FieldComm of all or substantially all the assets and liabilities of the HART® Communication Foundation and the Fieldbus Foundation was approved by both organizations' boards on August 30, 2014, and will become effective on or before January 1, 2015. The two organizations will operate independently until that time, but will engage in integration planning activities for the transition to FieldComm. Upon completion of such transfers to FieldComm by the two organizations and subject to any other residual state or federal law obligations, both organizations are then expected to cease doing business and will be legally dissolved in early 2015.

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2014-30787 Filed 1-2-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
tpni_ex102.htm

EXHIBIT 10.2
   
  
  
   
    	 
	  1


	  

	 


   
  
   
  2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROYCE J. KELLEY, III, :

Plaintiff, :

v. : CA 15-00657-CB-C

BALDWIN COUNTY 

CORRECTIONAL CENTER, :

Defendant. :

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, 

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action is due to be, and hereby is, DISMISSED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE in accordance with Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure for failure to prosecute and abide by this Court’s order entered on February 

22, 2016.

DONE this 19th day of May 2016.

s/Charles R. Butler, Jr. 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00657-CB-C Document 10 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-109177 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 25, 2005 (September 27, 2005 as
to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 13 and the subsequent event
as discussed in Note 15), which report expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the restatement described in Note
13 and the subsequent event described in Note 15 appearing in this Amendment No.
1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of MicroIslet, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2004.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP



San Diego, California
September 27, 2005
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

CELLADON CORPORATION 

SUMMARY OF RETENTION PROGRAM 

Adopted April 26, 2015 

Amended on May 13, 2015 

Pursuant to Celladon Corporation’s retention program, the executives officers and former executive officers listed below will be eligible
to receive, or have received, a lump sum retention payment equal to 50% of his or her base salary upon such individual remaining employed by Celladon until December 31, 2015, or such individual’s earlier termination without cause prior to
such date: 
  

						
	 Executive Officer
	  	Retention Payment
	Current:	  	 			
	 Andrew Jackson
	  	 	$	110,000	 
	 Rebecque Laba
	  	 	$	141,934	 
	 Elizabeth Reed
	  	 	$	140,250	 
	 Fred Wiklund
	  	 	$	125,712	 
	Former:	  	 			
	 Jeff Rudy*
	  	 	$	143,312	 
	 Ryan Takeya*
	  	 	$	120,328	 
	  

*  Terminated without cause.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          19,830
<SECURITIES>                                       252
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,470
<ALLOWANCES>                                       487
<INVENTORY>                                      7,582
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,958
<PP&E>                                          11,652
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,469
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           861
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,700
<SALES>                                          9,614
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,614
<CGS>                                            9,589
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,589
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,494
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 773
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,242)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,242)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,242)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2327 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2327

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for the Commission 
on Security and Cooperation in Europe, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for the Commission 
on Security and Cooperation in Europe, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE COMMISSION ON 
              SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE, SALARIES AND EXPENSES 
              FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for the Commission on 
Security and Cooperation in Europe, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal 
year 2024 may not exceed $0.
                                 <all>
```