alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2105 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2105

 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for District of 
   Columbia, Federal Payment to the DC Water and Sewer Authority for 
                           fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for District of 
   Columbia, Federal Payment to the DC Water and Sewer Authority for 
                           fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DISTRICT OF 
              COLUMBIA, FEDERAL PAYMENT TO THE DC WATER AND SEWER 
              AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for District of Columbia, 
Federal Payment to the DC Water and Sewer Authority for fiscal year 
2024 may not exceed $8,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                     DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                            22,291
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                    153,694
<ALLOWANCES>                       3,466
<INVENTORY>                      131,737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 309,087
<PP&E>                           294,688
<DEPRECIATION>                   177,965
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   518,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             94,311
<BONDS>                           45,240
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                             457
<OTHER-SE>                       366,170
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     518,614
<SALES>                          164,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 164,031
<CGS>                             96,784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     96,784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  41,653
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     266
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 1,208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   24,574
<INCOME-TAX>                       8,847
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               15,727
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                      15,727
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.40
        

</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

418 

CA 11-00780 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, FAHEY, AND PERADOTTO, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF JACQUELINE 

FLEMING, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KIDSPEACE NATIONAL CENTERS, BETY FARKAS, LSMW, 

PROGRAM MANAGER AND JAIME A. KOSICH, MSEDC, 

FAMILY RESOURCE SPECIALIST, 

RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

FRANK S. FALZONE, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

HARRIS BEACH PLLC, BUFFALO (DALE WORRALL OF COUNSEL), FOR

RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick

H. NeMoyer, J.), entered May 26, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR

article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding

seeking to annul the determination to “terminat[e]” her certification

as a foster parent. Petitioner contends that she was denied

procedural due process because she was not given notice and

opportunity to be heard with respect to the termination. We reject

that contention. KidsPeace National Centers (respondent) notified

petitioner by letter that it would “close” her certification effective

July 10, 2009. Petitioner’s current certification to board children

expired July 2, 2009 in any event, and thus respondent essentially

notified petitioner that it would not renew her certification. “A

hearing is required only where a license is to be suspended or revoked

and . . . due process does not mandate such a hearing before the

denial of a renewal license” (Matter of M.S.B.A. Corp. v Markowitz, 23

AD3d 390, 391; see Matter of Daxor Corp. v State of N.Y. Dept. of

Health, 90 NY2d 89, 98, rearg denied 90 NY2d 937, cert denied 523 US

1074; Testwell, Inc. v New York City Dept. of Bldgs., 80 AD3d 266,

273-274). Thus, the only rights petitioner had to notice and an

opportunity to be heard were pursuant to respondent’s own policies and

the applicable state regulation, and “[t]he record amply demonstrates

that these requirements were satisfied” (Testwell, Inc., 80 AD3d at

274). With respect to the state regulation, petitioner was given

timely notice of respondent’s decision and the reasons therefor, as
-2- 418 

CA 11-00780 

required by 18 NYCRR 443.11 (a), and was afforded the requisite

opportunity “to meet with an official of the agency to review the

decision and the reasons for the agency decision” (18 NYCRR 443.11

[b]). We have reviewed petitioner’s remaining contentions and

conclude that they are without merit.

Entered: April 20, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hector Velez, Appellant.

[972 NYS2d 40]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert J. Adlerberg, J.H.O., at suppression hearing; Rena K. Uviller, J., at suppression ruling; A. Kirke Bartley, Jr., J., at plea; Rena K. *450Uviller, J., at sentencing), rendered July 28, 2011, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender, to a term of 2V2 years, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the indictment dismissed.

The suspicionless vehicle checkpoint stop that led to the recovery of contraband in this case was constitutionally impermissible because the primary purpose of the checkpoint was “essentially to serve the governmental interest in general crime control” *(People v Jackson,*99 NY2d 125, 129 [2002], citing *Indianapolis v Edmond,*531 US 32 [2000]). It is undisputed that the primary purpose of the checkpoint was to deter or control auto theft. Contrary to the People’s assertions, the interest in “controlling automobile thefts,” as described in this case, “is not distinguishable from the *general interest*in crime control” *(People v Jackson,*99 NY2d at 131, quoting *Delaware v Prouse,*440 US 648, 659 n 18 [1979] [emphasis supplied by Court of Appeals]; *see also Indianapolis,*531 US at 39-40). Under the applicable precedents, a secondary goal of promoting highway safety does not justify a checkpoint stop. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, DeGrasse, Freedman and Feinman, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I, Sharon L. Wardlaw, Chief Financial Officerof Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited (the “Company”) do hereby certify that:

 

(1)           Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10–Q of the Company for the quarterlyperiod ended July 31, 2003;

 

(2)           Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

(3)           Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects, thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,and for, the period presented in this quarterly report;

 

(4)           TheCompany’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a–14 and 15d–14) for the Company and we have:

 

(a)           designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportwas being prepared;

 

(b)           evaluated the effectiveness of theCompany’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

1

----

 

(c)           disclosed in this report any changein the Company's internal control over functional reporting that occurredduring the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Company's internal controlover financial reporting

 

(5)           TheCompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting to the Company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Company’s board of directors:

 

(a)           all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data; and

 

(b)           any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Dated: September 11, 2003

 

 
|   | /s/   Sharon L. Wardlaw    |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   |                            |
|   | Chief Financial Officer         |
|   |                            |
|   | Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited |

 

2

----
#### In the Matter of Johnathan YY., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Saratoga County Department of Social Services, Appellant; Krystal *ZZ.,*Respondent.

[975 NYS2d 700]

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Saratoga County (Hall, J.), entered January 31, 2013, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, granted respondent’s motion for an order directing petitioner to return her child to her.

In October 2012, Family Court adjudicated respondent’s older child (born in 2011) neglected based on proof that respondent had inflicted injuries upon the child that resulted in her conviction of assault in the second degree. When her younger child was born in 2013, she consented to his temporary placement in foster care and petitioner commenced this proceeding alleging that the younger child was derivatively neglected. Shortly thereafter, respondent made an application to have the younger child returned to her custody *(see*Family Ct Act § 1028). Following a hearing, Family Court issued an order on January 31, 2013 that granted respondent’s motion to return the younger child to her. Petitioner appealed and obtained a stay from us of the January 31, 2013 order.

During the time this appeal has been pending, petitioner successfully moved for summary judgment on its derivative neglect petition, and Family Court, after a hearing, issued an order of disposition granting custody to petitioner and directing respondent to comply with the same terms and conditions as the order of disposition involving the older child. Under these circumstances, the current appeal is moot *(see e.g. Matter of Angel C. [Lynn H.],*103 AD3d 1246, 1247 [2013]; *Matter of Mary YY. [Albert YY.],*98 AD3d 1198, 1198 [2012]; *Matter of Derrick JJ.,*244 AD2d 790, 790 [1997]).

Peters, PJ., Rose and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1888 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of Representatives, Salaries and Expenses of the Office of Inspector General for 

fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House 

of Representatives, Salaries and Expenses of the Office 

of Inspector General for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SALARIES 

5 AND EXPENSES OF THE OFFICE OF INSPEC6 TOR GENERAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for House of Representatives, Salaries and Expenses 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1888 IH

1 of the Office of Inspector General for fiscal year 2024 may 

2 not exceed $5,019,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF PACER INTERNATIONAL, INC.



|                                                                                    |  |                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                                                                                    |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Intermodal Container Service, Inc. d/b/a Harbor Rail Transport                      |  | California                   
|Manufacturers Consolidation Service of Canada, Inc.                                 |  | Delaware                     
|Pacer Cartage, Inc.                                                                 |  | Delaware                     
|Pacer Transport, Inc.                                                               |  | California                   
|Pacer Distribution Services, Inc.                                                   |  | Delaware                     
|PDS Trucking, Inc.                                                                  |  | Delaware                     
|RF International, Ltd.                                                              |  | New York                     
|Ocean World Lines, Inc.                                                             |  | Delaware                     
|Pacer Transportation Solutions, Inc. formerly known as Pacer Global Logistics, Inc. |  | Ohio                         
|Pacer Stacktrain S. de R.L. de C.V.                                                 |  | Mexico                       
|Stacktrain Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.                                               |  | Mexico                       
|Pacer Stacktrain, Inc.                                                              |  | Tennessee                    
|S&H Transport, Inc.                                                                 |  | Delaware                     
|S&H Leasing, Inc.                                                                   |  | Delaware                     
|Pacer Container Line, Inc.                                                          |  | Delaware                     
|CTP Leasing, Inc.                                                                   |  | Delaware                     
|Pacer Services, Inc.                                                                |  | Delaware                     
|Rail to Rail Transport, Inc.                                                        |  | Delaware
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2257 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Marketing Services for 

fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Marketing Services for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, AGRI5 CULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE, MAR6 KETING SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural MarVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:33 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2257.IH H2257

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2257 IH

1 keting Service, Marketing Services for fiscal year 2024 

2 may not exceed $159,095,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Specifications, Tolerances, 

and Other Technical 

Requirements for 

Weighing and Measuring Devices 

as adopted by the 92nd National Conference on Weights and Measures 2007 

Editors: 

Tina Butcher 

Steve Cook 

Linda Crown 

Lynn Sebring 

Richard Suiter 

Juana Williams 

Carol Hockert, Chief 

Weights and Measures Division 

National Institute of Standards and Technology 

Weights and Measures Division 

Gaithersburg, MD 20899-2600

U. S. Department of Commerce 

Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary 

National Institute of 

Standards and Technology

James Turner, Acting Director 

NIST Handbook 44

2008 Edition 

Supersedes NIST Handbook 44, 2007 Edition
Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an 

experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or 

endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, 

materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. 

National Institute of Standards and Technology Handbook 44, 2008 Edition 

Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Handb. 44, 2008 Ed., 334 pages (Oct. 2007) 

CODEN: NIHAE2 

WASHINGTON: 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             32,478
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       9,326
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   41,804
<PP&E>                                            351,664
<DEPRECIATION>                                    212,149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    181,319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              91,954
<BONDS>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                           40,542
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                         1,340
<OTHER-SE>                                         47,483
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      181,319
<SALES>                                            65,871
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   66,771
<CGS>                                              37,079
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      37,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  2,849
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (52,406)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (52,406)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (52,406)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (   .01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (   .01)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2239 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2239

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
of Agriculture, Executive Operations, Office of Civil Rights for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
of Agriculture, Executive Operations, Office of Civil Rights for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR US DEPARTMENT OF 
              AGRICULTURE, EXECUTIVE OPERATIONS, OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS 
              FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for US Department of 
Agriculture, Executive Operations, Office of Civil Rights for fiscal 
year 2024 may not exceed $24,206,000.
                                 <all>
```