alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 17, 2014

No. 04-14-00555-CR

Robert MARTINEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 307125

Honorable Jason Pulliam, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On December 19, 2013, appellant Robert Martinez filed an application for writ of habeas 

corpus in County Court at Law No. 5 in Bexar County, Texas. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN.

art. 11.072 (West Supp. 2014). 

On February 4, 2014, the trial court heard arguments on Martinez’s application. The trial 

court determined, and advised Martinez, that he was not being held by any order from County 

Court at Law No. 5, but he could seek habeas corpus relief in a court of proper jurisdiction. The 

trial court documented its action in its criminal docket sheet, but it did not issue any order. 

Martinez filed a notice of appeal on August 4, 2014. The clerk’s and reporter’s records 

have been filed in this court.

On September 9, 2014, we advised Martinez that the clerk’s record did not appear to 

contain an appealable order or judgment. We ordered him to show cause in writing by 

September 29, 2014, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

On September 30, 2014, the trial court signed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and 

it denied the relief Martinez sought. The trial court’s findings and conclusions were filed in this 

court on October 2, 2014. 

The trial court’s September 30, 2014 order is an appealable order. See id. Martinez’s 

notice of appeal was timely filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 27.1(b) (prematurely filed notice). Our 

September 9, 2014 show cause order is satisfied.
Appellant’s brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of October, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31.1 CEO Certification

I, Gordon F. Lee, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of Bentley Communications Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date:October 13, 2003

/s/ Gordon F. Lee
-----------------
Gordon F. Lee
Chief Executive Officer
|Household Finance Corporation                 |             |               
|--------------------------------------------- | ----------- | --------------
|Household Auto Receivables Corporation 1999-1 |             |               
|Household Automobile Revolving Trust I        |             |               
|                                              |             |               
|Original Principal Class A                    |             |               
|Class A-1                                     | 147,000,000 |               
|Class A-2                                     | 180,220,000 |               
|Class A-3                                     | 156,010,000 |               
|Class A-4                                     | 179,050,000 |               
|Number of Class A Bonds (000's)               |             |               
|Class A-1                                     | 147,000     |               
|Class A-2                                     | 180,220     |               
|Class A-3                                     | 156,010     |               
|Class A-4                                     | 179,050     |               
|                                              |             |               
|                                              |             |               
|Distribution Date                             |             | 2001 Totals   
|Days                                          |             |               
|                                              |             |               
|CLASS A                                       |             |               
|Class A-1 Principal Distribution              |             | 0.00          
|Class A-1 Interest Distribution               |             | 0.00          
|                                              |             |               
|Class A-2 Principal Distribution              |             | 18,751,109.77 
|Class A-2 Interest Distribution               |             | 125,310.91    
|                                              |             |               
|Class A-3 Principal Distribution              |             | 123,279,516.82
|Class A-3 Interest Distribution               |             | 6,610,265.80  
|                                              |             |               
|Class A-4 Principal Distribution              |             | 0.00          
|Class A-4 Interest Distribution               |             | 11,906,825.04
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2160 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. Department 

of Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Refuge 

Fund for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. 

Department of Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service, 

National Wildlife Refuge Fund for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, US FISH 

5 AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, NATIONAL WILD6 LIFE REFUGE FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for U.S. Department of Interior, US Fish and WildVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:59 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2160.IH H2160

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2160 IH

1 life Service, National Wildlife Refuge Fund for fiscal year 

2 2024 may not exceed $13,228,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
----

Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In condition with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George G. Usher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  

the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

By /s/  George G. Usher             George G. Usher,Chief Executive OfficerDecember 14, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. JERRY G. BURGOS, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 273 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 9th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Order entered January 26, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 00565 - CV JW GST EXEMPT TRUST AND JAMES Y. WYNNE, Appellant s V. WRENO S. WYNNE AND W ILLIAM B. WYNNE, Appellee s On Appeal from the 86th District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 84117 - 86 

### O RDER Before the Court is appellants/cross

- appellees’ January 22, 2015, unopposed motion for extension of time to file their appellants’ reply and cross

- appellees’ briefs
. We GRANT the motion and ORDE R appellants/cross

- appellees to file their briefs no later than March 6, 2015.
/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
**Exhibit 12.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONS**

** **

I, Michel Demaré, certify that:

 

# 1.             I havereviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, as amended by this Amendment No. 1on Form 20-F/A, of ABB Ltd;

#  

# 2.             Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

#  

# 3.             Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

#  

# 4.             Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

#  

## (a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

##  

## (b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

##  

## (c)           Disclosedin this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

##  

# 5.             Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’sauditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

#  

## (a)           Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

##  

## (b)           Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

----

 
| Date: February 24, 2006 |                     |
|------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                         |                     |
|                         | /s/  MICHEL DEMARÉ  |   |
|                         | Michel  Demaré      |
|                         | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

2

----
EXHIBIT 99.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Crystalix Group International, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Marc Janssens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results   of operations of the
       Company.


------------------------------------------
Marc Janssens, Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 21, 2017

No. 04-17-00366-CR

Roger Trudell DAVIS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR3461

Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Brooke Wagner, the court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this 

appeal, has filed a notification of late record, stating that the appellant has failed to pay or make 

arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the reporter’s record.

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court within ten days of 

the date of this order that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been 

made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s 

fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due within 

thirty days from the date of this order, and the court will only consider those issues or points 

raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of July, 2017.
___________________________________

Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
Exhibit 10.24
  Property Lease Contract
  LESSOR:Fujian Xinhengji Advertising Co. Ltd.
  LESSEE:Fuzhou Fuyu Advertising Co. Ltd.
 
 This contract is made and entered into by and between the Lessor and the Lessee in accordance with the Contract Law of the People’s Republic of Chinaand other relevant rules.
 
 Article 1 The Lessor will lease a property – the 28th storey of Yifa Building (hereinafter referred to as the “Leased Property”) to the Lessee. The Leased Property has a gross floor area of 500 square meters.
  Article 2 The term of the lease shall be from 10/10/2011 to 10/09/2012.
  Article 3 The rent of the Leased Property shall be RMB 5000 (in words: five thousand) per month.
  Article 4 The Lessee shall pay the rent to the Lessor on a yearly basis.
 
 Article 5 The Leased Property shall be devoted to the purpose of office.
  
 Article 6 The Lessor shall be responsible for utility fees, sanitary fees, property management fees and other fees relating the property lease.
 
 Article 7 Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this Contract shall be resolved through amicable consultations between the two parties.
 
 Article 8 This Contract is executed in duplicate, with one copy for the Lessor and one for the Lessee. This Contract shall become effective when signed by both parties.
  
  LESSOR: Fujian Xinhengji Advertising Co. Ltd.
  Authorized Representative: Chen Minhua
 Date:10/07/2011
  LESSEE:Fuzhou Fuyu Advertising Co. Ltd.
 Authorized Representative: Fan Yanling
 Date:10/07/2011
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 USC § 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Jiangbo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“the
Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Elsa
Sung, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





(a)
            The annual report on Form 10-K
      for the year ended June 30, 2009 of the Company fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and




(b)
            Information contained in the Form
      10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
September 28, 2009




/s/
      Elsa SungElsa
      SungChief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.31






[English Summary]
 
 Cooperative Agreement
 
 Party A: Fujian Xin Hengji Advertisement Limited Company
 Party B: Fuzhou Fuyu Advertisement Limited Company
 
 Reference is made to the Advertisement Agreement and its relative agreement Program Purchase and Production Management Agreement, dated July 11, 2003 (the “Agreement”).
 
 Cooperation:
 Party B agrees to provide necessary service to Party A under the Agreement.
 Based on the services to be provided by Party B, Party A agrees to grant the exclusive rights to Party B so that Party B will be the exclusive agent for advertisement business of Fujian Education TV Station and entitle to any profits incurred.
 
 Termination:
 This agreement may be modified or adjusted with mutual consent of both parties.
 
 Dispute:
 If there is any dispute between the parties, both parties shall resolve the dispute through compromise settlement. If the parties cannot reach the settlement, then either party can resolve the dispute by the courts.
 
 Date of the Agreement:
 August 1, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2083 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2083

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The Judiciary, 
    Court of Appeals, District Courts, and Other Judicial Services, 
Salaries and Expenses, National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The Judiciary, 
    Court of Appeals, District Courts, and Other Judicial Services, 
Salaries and Expenses, National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE JUDICIARY, COURT 
              OF APPEALS, DISTRICT COURTS, AND OTHER JUDICIAL SERVICES, 
              SALARIES AND EXPENSES, NATIONAL CHILDHOOD VACCINE INJURY 
              ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for The Judiciary, Court of 
Appeals, District Courts, and Other Judicial Services, Salaries and 
Expenses, National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act for fiscal year 2024 
may not exceed $8,475,000.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CEDRIC ANDERSON, AIS #198757, :

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : CIVIL ACTION 15-00113-KD-M

:

OFFICER THOMAS, :

Defendant. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the 

issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated October 1, 2015, is 

ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is 

GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED this the 2nd day of November 2015.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:15-cv-00113-KD-M Document 20 Filed 11/02/15 Page 1 of 1