alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,795
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  217,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,928
<INVENTORY>                                    191,241
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               428,050
<PP&E>                                         457,118
<DEPRECIATION>                                 283,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 702,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          150,219
<BONDS>                                         48,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,027
<OTHER-SE>                                     475,311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   702,418
<SALES>                                        233,568
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               233,568
<CGS>                                          157,524
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  157,524
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,135
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   392
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,378
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,654
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,888
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,766
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,766
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

The undersigned, Alexander Lidow, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of International Rectifier Corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

 

(i)                                     the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report)fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)                                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company as of, and for the periods presented in theReport.

 

 
| Dated: May 17, 2006 |   |                                  |
|--------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                     |   |                                  |
|                     |   |                                  |
|                     |   | /s/ Alexander  Lidow                  |
|                     |   | Alexander Lidow                       |
|                     |   | Director and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

Asigned original of the written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to International Rectifier Corporation and will be furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
#### Lindsey Stephenson, Respondent, v Andrew P. Fleming et al., Appellants. Martha Kavanaugh, Respondent, v Andrew P. Fleming et al., Appellants.

[965 NYS2d 919]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), entered February 1, 2012. The order denied the motions of defendants to dismiss the actions.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. Present — Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley and Valentino, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jorge CABALLERO-VILLEDA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-10192.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 12, 2006.*

Decided June 19, 2006.

Ronald C. Rachow, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Reno, NV, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Michael K. Powell, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Reno, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: KLEINFELD, PAEZ, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jorge Caballero-Villeda appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Caballero-Villeda contends that under *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), the fact of his prior conviction and that it occurred before his deportation needed to be charged in the indictment and proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. This argument is foreclosed by *United States v. Esparza-Gonzalez,*422 F.3d 897, 907 (9th Cir.2005), and *United States v. Rodriguez-Lara,*421 F.3d 932, 949-50 (9th Cir.2005).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 78908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30670]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Pistoia Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 20, 2014, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Pistoia Alliance, Inc. has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. 
The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Hewlett-Packard 
Company, Palo Alto, CA; Etzard Stotle (individual member), Arlesheim, 
SWITZERLAND; Patcore Inc., Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, JAPAN; and University 
of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, UNITED KINGDOM, have been added as 
parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Pistoia Alliance, Inc. intends to 
file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On May 28, 2009, Pistoia Alliance, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 
6(b) of the Act on July 15, 2009 (74 FR 34364).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 5, 
2014. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on October 9, 2014 (79 FR 61098).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-30670 Filed 12-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60822

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GERRY INDIANA HARRIS, also

known as Gerri Harris,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:96-CR-59-B

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gerry Indiana Harris appeals the district court’s denial of

his motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to a consensual

search. The district court did not commit clear error in finding

that the Government proved, by a preponderance of the evidence,

that Harris’ consent was voluntary. See United States v.

Gonzales, 79 F.3d 413, 419 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct.

183 (1996); United States v. Kelley, 981 F.2d 1464, 1470 (5th
No. 96-60822 

-2-

Cir. 1993). The district court did not commit clear error in

holding that Harris’ consent was to the search of his entire 

vehicle. See United States v. McSween, 53 F.3d 684, 688 (5th

Cir. 1995).

AFFIRMED.
#### Alicia M. Flatts, Appellant, v Virginia D. Rodriguez, Respondent.

[967 NYS2d 863]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Shirley Troutman, J.), entered February 27, 2012. The order granted the motion of defendant Virginia D. Rodriguez for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Carni, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7491

MICHAEL BLACK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ARTHUR F. BEELER, Warden - FMC, Butner, NC,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CA-04-360-5-H)

Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 28, 2004

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Black, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael Black appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition,

in which he challenged conditions of confinement. Because Black

may amend his complaint to proceed under Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971),

rather than § 2241, the district court’s dismissal without

prejudice is not a final order and is not subject to appellate

review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,

10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss

this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2134 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, 

Office of Personnel Management, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, Office of Personnel Management, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES, OFFICE OF PER5 SONNEL MANAGEMENT, SALARIES AND EX6 PENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Independent Agencies, Office of Personnel ManVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:07 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2134.IH H2134

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2134 IH

1 agement, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may 

2 not exceed $132,172,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
IN THE MATTER OF THE

APPLICATION TO RESIGN FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW OF PETER WOODBURY RAND IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND

Misc. Docket AG No. 69 September Term, 2018

ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of the Application to Resign from the Practice of Law of Peter Woodbury Rand and the response of Bar Counsel thereto, it is this 3rd day of April, 2019; ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the resignation of Peter Woodbury Rand from the Bar of the State of Maryland is hereby accepted; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name Peter Woodbury Rand from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2113 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2113

 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
      Agencies, Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council, 
      Environmental Review Improvement Fund for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
      Agencies, Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council, 
      Environmental Review Improvement Fund for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR INDEPENDENT 
              AGENCIES, FEDERAL PERMITTING IMPROVEMENT STEERING 
              COUNCIL, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR FISCAL 
              YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Independent Agencies, 
Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council, Environmental Review 
Improvement Fund for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $6,070,000.
                                 <all>
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 6, 2010

p0929 

# Order

October 6, 2010

141088

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141088 COA: 297062 Monroe CC: 08-037332-FC TROY DALE WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 21, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1

BULOVA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Stephen L Gurba, Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Stephen L GurbaStephen L GurbaPrincipal Executive Officer
December 30, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of permits issued Under the Antarctic Conservation of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Li Ling Hamady, ACA Permit Officer, Division of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Or by email:                         *ACApermits@nsf.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On November 25, 2014 the National Science Foundation published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     of a permit application received. The permit was issued on December 25, 2014 to: Ashley Perrin, Permit No. 2015-016.                

Nadene G. Kennedy,

Polar Coordination Specialist, Division of Polar Programs.

[FR Doc. 2014-30730 Filed 12-31-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2256 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2256

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
 of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Buildings 
                  and Facilities for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
 of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Buildings 
                  and Facilities for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR US DEPARTMENT OF 
              AGRICULTURE, ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE 
              BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

     Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for US Department of 
Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Buildings and 
Facilities for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $3,175,000.
                                 <all>
```
#### Deana L. ZELENKA, In the Name of the United States of America Pursuant to the False Claims Act 31 U.S.C. Section 3730, Appellant v. NFI INDUSTRIES, INC.; Honeywell International, Inc.

No. 06-3650.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued: Nov. 28, 2007.

Filed: Jan. 15, 2008.

*494Ross Begelman, Esq. (Argued), Begelman *&*Orlow, P.C., Cherry Hill, NJ, for Appellant Deana L. Zelenka, etc.

Steven I. Frank, Esq. (Argued), United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, and Stuart A. Minkowitz, Esq., Office of the United States Attorney, Newark, NJ, for Amicus-Appellant-USA.

Justin Loughry, Esq. (Argued), Lawrence W. Lindsay, Esq., Loughry & Lindsay, Camden, NJ, for Appellee NFL Industries, Inc., et al.

Kali Bracey, Esq. (Argued), Julie M. Carpenter, Esq., Jenner & Block, Washington, DC, and Peter J. Torcicollo, Esq., Gibbons, Newark, NJ, for Honeywell International, Inc.

Before: BARRY, FUENTES and GARTH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

BARRY, Circuit Judge.

Deana L. Zelenka appeals the July 6, 2006, 436 F.Supp.2d 701, order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granting the motions to dismiss of appellees NFI Industries, Inc. and Honeywell International, Inc. Appellant raises two issues on appeal:

> “1. Whether the lower court erred in granting the motion[s] to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) by misapplying the limited facts and competent evidence offered below in concluding plaintiffs complaint did not allege a legal obligation that is clearly related to inspection fees and dismissed plaintiffs claim.

> 2. Whether the lower court erred in finding that plaintiffs complaint did not state a cause of action by failing to properly allege that an obligation had been avoided or decreased under the false claims act 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(7).”

Appellant’s Br. at 1.

We have reviewed the submissions of the parties and have heard oral argument. We conclude that, substantially for the reasons set forth in the Opinion of the District Court, we will affirm.1

1

. We do not decide whether, as the District Court appeared to assume, inspection fees have been and will be required.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134042 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134042 

 COA: 276892 

Kent CC: 05-008645-FC 

LAYVELL GUY,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 24, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0723 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 30, 2007 

 Clerk