alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mary Lou Knoch, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent.

[970 NYS2d 270]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kurtz, J.), dated September 6, 2012, as denied that branch of her motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 which was to impose a monetary sanction upon the defendant for failure to provide discovery and granted that branch of the motion which was for an award of costs only to the extent of awarding her costs in the sum of $100.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to impose a monetary sanction upon the defendant, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion to the extent of imposing a monetary sanction upon the defendant in the sum of $2,500 payable to the plaintiffs counsel; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the plaintiff.

The defendant did not begin to produce evidence crucial to the prosecution of this case until more than three years after such production was ordered by the court, five months after the original trial date was adjourned, and two months after the plaintiff refiled the note of issue. Consequently, a monetary sanction in the sum of $2,500 is warranted to compensate the plaintiffs counsel for the time expended and costs incurred in connection with the defendant’s failure to fully and timely comply with court-ordered disclosure and discovery requests *(see*CPLR 3126; *O’Neill v Ho,*28 AD3d 626, 627 [2006]).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are improperly raised for the first time on appeal, and therefore are not properly before this Court *(see 1812 Quentin Rd., LLC v 1812 Quentin Rd. Condominium Ltd.,*94 AD3d 1070, 1072 [2012]; *Schiff v State of New York,*31 AD3d 526, 529 [2006]; *Cadle Co. v Organes Enters., Inc.,*29 AD3d 927, 929 [2006]). Dillon, J.E, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2081 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The Judiciary, US 

Court of International Trade, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The 

Judiciary, US Court of International Trade, Salaries and 

Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 THE JUDICIARY, US COURT OF INTER5 NATIONAL TRADE, SALARIES AND EXPENSES 

6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for The Judiciary, US Court of International Trade, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2081 IH

1 Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $18,882,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### NSK LTD., NSK Corporation, and NSK Bearings Europe, Ltd., Plaintiffs, and NTN Corporation, NTN Bearing Corporation of America, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corporation, NTN-Driveshaft, Inc., and NTN-BCA Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Asahi Seiko Co., Ltd., Plaintiff, and Isuzu Motors Ltd. and MPB Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, and Timken U.S. Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 2005-1296, 2005-1317, 2005-1318.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 3, 2006.

*ORDER*

NSK Ltd. et al. and Asahi Seiko Co., Ltd. move without opposition to dismiss their appeals, 2005-1317, -1318, from *NSK Ltd. v. United States,*No. 02-00627 (Ct. Int’l Trade).

*944Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The revised official caption in 2005-1296 is reflected above.

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs in 2005-1317, -1318.
**Exhibit 21.1 Subsidiaries of SunCom Wireless Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Triton PCS Holdings, Inc.)**The subsidiaries of SunCom Wireless Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a/ Triton PCS Holdings, Inc.) are asfollows:SunCom Merger Corp., a Delaware corporationSunCom Wireless Investment Co., LLC, a Delaware limited liability companySunCom Wireless Affiliate Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability companySunCom Wireless, Inc. (f/k/a Triton PCS, Inc.), a Delaware corporationTriton PCS Holdings Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability companyTriton PCS Finance Company, Inc., a Delaware corporationSunCom Wireless Management Company, Inc. (f/k/a Triton Management Company, Inc.), a DelawarecorporationTriton PCS Investment Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability companyAffiliate License Co., LLC, a Delaware limited liability companySunCom Wireless International LLC, a Delaware limited liability companySunCom Wireless Property Company, L.L.C. (f/k/a Triton PCS Property Company L.L.C.), a Delawarelimited liability companyTriton PCS Equipment Company L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability companySunCom Wireless Operating Company, L.L.C. (f/k/a Triton PCS Operating Company L.L.C.), a Delawarelimited liability companyTriton PCS License Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability companySunCom Wireless Puerto Rico Operating Co., LLC, a Delaware limited liability companyTriton Network Newco, LLC, a Delaware limited liability companySunCom Wireless Puerto Rico Property Company, L.L.C. (f/k/a AWS Network Newco, LLC), a Delawarelimited liability companyAWS License Newco, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eugene Feeney, Appellant.

[871 NYS2d 340]

*615Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J.), dated July 9, 2007, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant argues that the County Court improperly assessed him points for “forcible compulsion” since this was not an element of the underlying crime of which he was convicted *(see*Penal Law § 130.40 [3]). However, the court was not limited to considering only the crime of which the defendant was convicted in making its determination *(see*Correction Law § 168-n [3]; *People v LaRock,*45 AD3d 1121 [2007]). Moreover, in making the relevant determination of a sex offender’s risk level designation, “the court shall review any victim’s statement” (Correction Law § 168-n [3]). Here, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the victim’s statement provided the necessary basis to assess him points under risk level factor 1, “forcible compulsion,” as well as under risk level factor 4, “continuing course of sexual misconduct” (see *People v Richards,*50 AD3d 1329 [2008]; *People v Ruddy,*31 AD3d 517 [2006]).

The defendant properly was assessed 15 points based upon his conviction of a prior nonviolent felony (see *People v Smith,*35 AD3d 693 [2006]; *People v Wroten,*286 AD2d 189 [2001]). The court also correctly determined that the defendant had failed to accept responsibility for his actions based upon his repeated failure to complete substance abuse rehabilitation programs while incarcerated (see *People v Mercado,*55 AD3d 583 [2008], *lv denied*11 NY3d 714 [2008]; *People v Palladino,*46 AD3d 864 [2007]; *People v Lewis,*37 AD3d 689 [2007]).

Accordingly, there was clear and convincing proof to warrant the assessment of 100 points against the defendant, thus rendering him a presumptive level two sex offender. Since there was insufficient evidence of any mitigating factor of a kind or degree, not otherwise adequately taken into account by the Sex Offender Registration Act guidelines, which would have justified a downward departure from this risk level, the court properly designated the defendant a level two sex offender, and its determination will not be disturbed *(see*Correction Law § 168-n [3]; *People v Marin,*48 AD3d 535 [2008]; *People v Morris,*33 AD3d *616778 [2006]). Skelos, J.E, Santucci, McCarthy and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 6-K REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the month of July 2004 Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc. 
 Canadian Pacific Tower, Ste 1600,100 Wellington Street W., Toronto, Ontario M5K 1B7, Canada 
 (Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.) Form 20-F  o        Form 40-F  þ (Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this form is also thereby furnishing the information
to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.) Yes  o        No  þ (If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-. This report furnished on Form 6-K shall be incorporated by reference into
each of the Registration Statements under the Securities Act of 1933 of the
registrant:
Form S-8 No.333-13960. Page 1 of 2 Pages
Exhibits Index appears on Page 3




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. FAIRMONT HOTELS & RESORTS INC.
(Registrant)Date: July 22, 2004
    By          /s/ Terence P. BadourName:
    Terence P. BadourTitle:
    Executive Vice President, Law and Administration
and Corporate Secretary




---



##### 



Exhibits Index The following is a list of Exhibits included as part of this Report on Form
6-K. Exhibit No.
    
    Description of Exhibits99.1
    
    Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc. Reports Second Quarter Results
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1993 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health 

and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National Institute 

of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National Institute of Biomedical Imaging 

and Bioengineering for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1993 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV3 ICES, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH NA4 TIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING 

5 AND BIOENGINEERING FOR FISCAL YEAR 

6 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Department of Health and Human Services, Na10 tional Institutes of Health National Institute of Bio11 medical Imaging and Bioengineering for fiscal year 2024 

12 may not exceed $389,464,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Dale D. Hughes, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner.

[962 NYS2d 920]

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, First Department in 1977. He maintained an office for the practice of law in Lake Hill, Ulster County.

On January 16, 2013, respondent was convicted in Ulster County Court upon his plea of guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the second degree, a class C felony *(see*Penal Law § 155.40 [1]). Petitioner moves pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a) and (b) to strike respondent’s name from the roll of at*1249torneys. Respondent has not replied to the motion or otherwise appeared.

Respondent was automatically disbarred and ceased to be an attorney when he entered his guilty plea to the felony *(see*Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [a]; *Matter of Wheatley,*89 AD3d 1276 [2011]). Therefore, we grant petitioner’s motion and strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys.

Rose, J.P., Lahtinen, Stein and Garry, JJ., concur.

Ordered that petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent’s name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York; and it is further ordered that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court’s rules regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys *(see*22 NYCRR 806.9).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2312 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of State, 

International Commissions, Construction for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of State, International Commissions, Construction for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 DEPARTMENT OF STATE, INTERNATIONAL 

5 COMMISSIONS, CONSTRUCTION FOR FISCAL 

6 YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Department of State, International Commissions, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2312 IH

1 Construction for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $29,400,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                                CLX ENERGY, INC.
                   Computation of Net Income (Loss) Per Share
                                  (Unaudited)


                                           Three months
                                        ended December 31,
                                    --------------------------
                                        2002          2001
                                    ------------  ------------
<S>                                 <C>           <C>
Net income (loss)                   $(   30,574)  $(   78,594)
                                    ============  ============

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                  2,631,936     2,631,936

Common equivalent shares
  representing shares issuable
  upon exercise of outstanding
  options                                     -             -
                                    ------------  ------------

                                      2,631,936     2,631,936
                                    ============  ============

Net income (loss) per share:
    Basic                           $(     0.01)  $(     0.03)
                                    ============  ============

    Diluted                         $(     0.01)  $(     0.03)
                                    ============  ============
</TABLE>



Stock options are not considered in the diluted EPS calculation for those
periods with net losses, as the impact of the potential common shares (250,000
shares at December 31, 2002 and 2001) would be to decrease loss per share.


<PAGE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 01, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 01, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21I0127. MARKERSON CODY GRIFFETH v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

20CR0303
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 187 

To ensure the payment of interest and principal of the debt of the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. MCCLINTOCK (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. GROTHMAN, and Mr. 

GAETZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To ensure the payment of interest and principal of the debt 

of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Default Prevention 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST ON PUBLIC 

7 DEBT AND SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUNDS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the event that the debt of the 

9 United States Government, as defined in section 3101 of 

10 title 31, United States Code, reaches the statutory limit, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 187 IH

1 the Secretary of the Treasury shall, in addition to any 

2 other authority provided by law, issue obligations under 

3 chapter 31 of title 31, United States Code, to pay with 

4 legal tender, and solely for the purpose of paying, the prin5 cipal and interest on obligations of the United States de6 scribed in subsection (b) after the date of the enactment 

7 of this Act. 

8 (b) OBLIGATIONS DESCRIBED.—For purposes of this 

9 subsection, obligations described in this subsection are ob10 ligations which are— 

11 (1) held by the public, or 

12 (2) held by the Old-Age and Survivors Insur13 ance Trust Fund and Disability Insurance Trust 

14 Fund. 

15 (c) PROHIBITION ON COMPENSATION FOR MEMBERS

16 OF CONGRESS.—None of the obligations issued under sub17 section (a) may be used to pay compensation for Members 

18 of Congress. 

19 (d) OBLIGATIONS EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DEBT

20 LIMIT.—Obligations issued under subsection (a) shall not 

21 be taken into account in applying the limitation in section 

22 3101(b) of title 31, United States Code, to the extent that 

23 such obligation would otherwise cause the limitation in 

24 section 3101(b) of title 31, United States Code, to be ex25 ceeded. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 187 IH

1 (e) REPORT ON CERTAIN ACTIONS.— 

2 (1) IN GENERAL.—If, after the date of the en3 actment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury 

4 exercises his authority under subsection (a), the Sec5 retary shall thereafter submit a report each week the 

6 authority is in use providing an accounting relating 

7 to— 

8 (A) the principal on mature obligations 

9 and interest that is due or accrued of the 

10 United States, and 

11 (B) any obligations issued pursuant to 

12 subsection (a). 

13 (2) SUBMISSION.—The report required by para14 graph (1) shall be submitted to the Committee on 

15 Ways and Means of the House of Representatives 

16 and the Committee on Finance of the Senate. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32(c)


CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


FOR PPL
ENERGY SUPPLY, LLC'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2008





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Energy Supply, LLC (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I,
the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that:





·
            The
      Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and·
            The
      information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.











Date:  August
      1, 2008
            /s/  James
      H. MillerJames
      H. Miller
              President
              PPL
      Energy Supply, LLC








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.