alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form  10-QSB  of Kent  Financial  Services,  Inc.,  for the  nine  months  ended
September  30,  2000 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                   0000316028
<NAME>                                  KENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                            1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      4,151
<SECURITIES>                                8,713
<RECEIVABLES>                               1,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,960
<PP&E>                                      1,720
<DEPRECIATION>                              595
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       1,171
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    183
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,985
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,305
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            4,701
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            3,412
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          332
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             957
<INCOME-TAX>                                9
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         948
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                948
<EPS-BASIC>                                 .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .51



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RAYMOND HARRISON, AIS #186090 :

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : CIVIL ACTION 14-00085-KD-C

:

NOAH PRICE OLIVER, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the 

issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation 

to which objection is made,1 the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made 

under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated February 10, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of 

this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants Noah Price Oliver, Sam Cochran, 

Mobile County Sheriff’s Department, Mobile County Metro Jail Personnel, and the two 

Transportation Officers’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED such that this action is 

DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety for failure to state a valid Section 1983 claim.

DONE and ORDERED this the 26th day of February 2015.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 1 Harrison timely filed his Objections (Doc. 36), and thus, his motion for an extension of time 

(Doc. 37) is MOOT.

Case 1:14-cv-00085-KD-C Document 38 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 1
#### Yellowbook, Inc., Formerly Known as Yellow Book Sales and Distribution Company, Respondent, v Bonfiglio & Asterita, LLC, et al., Appellants.

[974 NYS2d 267]

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), dated March 27, 2012, which granted *1061the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the complaint and denied their cross motion to compel discovery.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the complaint. The plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting the subject contracts, sample advertisements, and proof of the defendants’ failure to submit payment in the required amount *(see*CPLR 3212 [b]). In opposition, the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Elisa Dreier Reporting Corp. v Global NAPs Networks, Inc.,*84 AD3d 122, 127 [2011]; *see also Dunkin’ Donuts of Am. v Liberatore,*138 AD2d 559, 560 [1988]). Moreover, the defendants could not avoid summary judgment based on their claimed need for discovery, as they did not offer an evidentiary basis to suggest that discovery might lead to relevant evidence or that facts essential to opposing the motion were exclusively within the plaintiffs knowledge and control *(see*CPLR 3212 [f]; *Seidman v Industrial Recycling Props., Inc.,*106 AD3d 983, 985 [2013]).

The defendants’ remaining contention is without merit. Mastro, J.P., Leventhal, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of BF Acquisition Group V, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William R. Colucci, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: July 29, 2008



| |                              
| | -----------------------------
| | /s/ William R. Colucci       
| | William R. Colucci, President
| | BF Acquisition Group V, Inc.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of FieldPoint Petroleum Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ray Reaves, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  _/s/ Ray Reaves_____ Ray Reaves Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer May 13, 2011
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-30862, 333-47002, 333-47008, 333-48430,
333-75710 and 333-75712) and Form S-3 (No. 333-60350) of Choice One
Communications Inc. of our report dated March 27, 2003 relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which
appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Rochester, New York
March 30, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SHARI CRISWELL, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0222-CG-M

)

THE GUARDIAN LIFE 

INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW 

YORK,

)

)

)

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

The parties having filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. 

17), all claims in this cause are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party 

shall bear her or its own costs.

DONE and ORDERED this 7th day of August, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00222-CG-M Document 18 Filed 08/07/15 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

BULOVA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Stephen L Gurba, Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Stephen L GurbaStephen L GurbaPrincipal Executive OfficerDecember 30, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29262]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Performance Review Board Members

AGENCY: Corporate Senior Executive Management Office, Department of 
Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4) agencies are 
required to publish a notice in the Federal Register of the appointment 
of Performance Review Board (PRB) members. This notice announces the 
appointment of persons to serve on the PRB of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs.

DATES: Effective Date: December 12, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Corporate Senior Executive Management Office, Department of 
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Tia N. Butler, Executive 
Director, Corporate Senior Executive Management Office (052), 
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20420, (202) 461-7865. (This is not a toll free number.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The membership of the Department of Veterans 
Affairs Performance Review Board is as follows:

Gina Farrisee (Chair)
A. Jacy Thurmond, Jr.
Danny Pummill
Patricia C. Vandenberg
Ron Walters
Arthur Gonzalez
Elisa Basnight
Georgia Coffey

Signing Authority

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this 
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document 
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as 
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jose D. 
Riojas, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this 
document on December 9, 2014, for publication.

    Dated: December 10, 2014.
William F. Russo,
Acting Director, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of 
the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014-29262 Filed 12-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Baker, Elder and Fitzpatrick

VIC T. DYE v. Record No. 1971-95-3 MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM HELEN CREGGER DYE FEBRUARY 13, 1996

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SMYTH COUNTY Charles B. Flannagan, II, Judge (Robert Austin Vinyard; Vinyard and Moise, on brief), for appellant. (John H. Tate, Jr.; Gwyn & Tate, on brief), for appellee.

Vic T. Dye (husband) appeals the equitable distribution decision of the circuit court awarding Helen Cregger Dye (wife) seventy-five percent interest in the marital share of the parties' residence. Husband contends the trial court erred when it failed to award him a fifty percent interest. Upon reviewing the record and briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial court. Rule 5A:27. As husband recognizes, Virginia's equitable distribution scheme does not provide "a statutory presumption of equal distribution." Papuchis v. Papuchis , 2 Va. App. 130, 132, 341 S.E.2d 829, 830-31 (1986). "Moreover, in reviewing an equitable distribution award, we rely heavily on the trial judge's

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.2 discretion in weighing the particular circumstances of each

case." Aster v. Gross , 7 Va. App. 1, 8, 371 S.E.2d 833, 837 (1988). The award "will not be set aside unless it is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it." Srinivasan v. Srinivasan , 10 Va. App. 728, 732, 396 S.E.2d 675, 678 (1990). The final decree demonstrates that the trial court considered the statutory factors and complied with the statutory requirements. The real and personal property of the parties was classified and valued. The decree expressly noted that the court "has considered the factors mentioned in § 20-107.3(E)," and referred to the factors "which the Court believes are fully set forth" in wife's memorandum. The marital residence had formerly belonged to wife's family and wife retained an inherited twenty-five percent interest as her separate property. The trial court awarded wife seventy-five percent of the remaining share of the residence, which was classified as marital property and valued at $22,875.00. While wife received a larger share of this piece of realty, another piece of real estate was divided equally between the parties. In addition, husband received the greater portion of the parties' intangible marital property, receiving property worth $16,492.38, compared to wife's share worth $11,243.88. The trial court's equitable distribution scheme was not plainly wrong or unsupported by the evidence. Therefore, we cannot say the trial court erred or abused its discretion by3 awarding wife a greater share of the marital home.

Accordingly, the decision of the circuit court is summarily affirmed. Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 3, 2013

d0826

Order 

Clerk

September 3, 2013

147127

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147127

COA: 307645

Genesee CC: 11-028599-FH

WILLIAM JOSEPH MOODY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 2, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

October 16, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00255

- CV

Andres BUENO
, Appellant

v.

Melissa HERNANDEZ
, Appellee
From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texa s Trial Court No. 13

- 03

- 52114

- CV Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding


### ORDER
On August 29, 2014, this court issued its opinion and judgment

. On October 2, 2014, Appellee Melissa Hernandez filed a motion for en banc reconsideration . The Court requests that the Appellant Andres Bueno file a response on or before October 30, 2014

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.2.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Ju stice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 16th day of October, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Cl erk of Court
Community Resilience Workshop - Data Needs for Resilience Planning and Decision-Making

14

Session 1: How Communities Characterize Themselves, Set Goals, and Make Decisions

Sean McGlynn, Santa Rosa, CA, City Manager 

As City Manager of Santa Rosa, CA, Sean McGlynn has assumed 

the role of directing the City’s recovery efforts from the October, 

2017 Tubbs wildfires. The City plans for a wide range of natural 

hazards such as wildfire in a wildland urban interface, compounded 

by risks associated with drought, earthquake, and flood. Sean was 

already leading the City in its efforts to address affordable housing 

shortages, rising homeless population, and infrastructure challenges 

before the fires devastated the City. The rebuild effort must address 

the economic, social and emotional tolls cause by the destruction of 

over 3,000 homes within the City’s boundaries, over $1 billion in 

damages, while also continuing to effectively address non-disaster crises and issues. Knowing 

well the City structure, challenges and how to work across all departments, Sean has been 

invested in all aspects of recovery and rebuilding in a resilient manner. Sean’s work can be 

described as defining the whole community needs for long term recovery and resiliency. This 

includes providing direction to all City Departments on FEMA Public Assistance, both 404 and 

406 mitigation, HUD’s CDBG-DR program and the City’s Action Plan for managing the funds, 

identifying strategies for involving foundations and non-profits in the rebuild to reflect the City’s 

priorities, while continuing to focus on how to meaningfully drive some of the North Bay 

regional strategies for recovery. While Santa Rosa is the Sonoma County seat, many of the 

challenges faced here are the same ones other cities and counties north of San Francisco also 

grapple with addressing. As such, Sean is aware of the need for tools to assist with decision 

making and how each of his departments could benefit from the work NIST is putting into the 

development of tools that will help facilitate local decision making.

Abstract

Sifting through the Debris/Data: Recovery and Resiliency in Santa Rosa, CA

On October 8, 2017 the Tubbs Fire ripped through Santa Rosa, CA, destroying over 3,000 homes 

and over 30 businesses. Data (and the lack thereof) has presented opportunities and 

challenges: from leaning into recovery, managing relationships with State and Federal partners, 

strengthening local and regional resiliency, and understanding the demands and dilemmas facing 

victims as they attempt to rebuild their lives. The presentation will examine lessons learned from 

the largest disaster in California since the 1906 earthquake, and the essential role data and data 

management play in recovery and developing community resilience.
#### In re COMPUTER DYNAMICS, INCORPORATED, Debtor. Stephen Gary Merrill, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United States Trustee, Party in Interest-Appellee.

No. 00-2469.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 17, 2001.

Decided May 22, 2001.

Stephen Merrill, Ghent Law Offices, Norfolk, VA, for appellant.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Gary Merrill appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order which suspended his right to practice before the bankruptcy court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Our review of the record included on appeal, as well on Merrill’s brief, discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Merrill v. United States Trustee,*Nos. CA-00-556-2; BK-95-23127-A (E.D.Va. Oct. 13, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30060]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-255-LA; ASLBP No. 15-936-03-LA-BD01]


Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Establishment of Atomic Safety 
and Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission, see 37 FR 28,710 (Dec. 
29, 1972), and the Commission's regulations, see, e.g., 10 CFR 2.104, 
2.105, 2.300, 2.309, 2.313, 2.318, 2.321, notice is hereby given that 
an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) is being established to 
preside over the following proceeding: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 
(Palisades Nuclear Plant).
    This proceeding involves an application by Entergy Nuclear 
Operations, Inc. (Entergy) for a license amendment for Palisades 
Nuclear Plant, located in Van Buren County, Michigan. In response to a 
notice filed in the Federal Register, see 79 FR 58,812 (Sept. 30, 
2014), a Petition to Intervene was filed on December 1, 2014 by Beyond 
Nuclear, Don't Waste Michigan, Michigan Safe Energy Future--Shoreline 
Chapter, and the Nuclear Energy Information Service.
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

Ronald M. Spritzer, Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Dr. Gary S. Arnold, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Dr. Thomas J. Hirons, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule. See 10 CFR 2.302.

    Rockville, Maryland.
    Dated: December 17, 2014.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 2014-30060 Filed 12-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report of AdStar, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Anthony J. Fidaleo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

        A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.


/s/ Anthony J. Fidaleo
-------------------------------
Anthony J. Fidaleo
Chief Financial Officer

March 30, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

GREGORY MAXWELL,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 33 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.