alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CYTOMEDIX, INC.**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. §1350**

| 1.   | The                Company's 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Company's 10-KSB for the fiscal year                ended                December 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the                financial condition and results of operations of the Company for                said                period. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                |                       |                                |
|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                                           |                  |                           |
| Date: March              23,              2006 | By:              | /s/ Kshitij              Mohan |
|                                                | Kshitij              Mohan |
|                                                |                       |
Exhibit 10.2 10Q Qtr 2 2015






Exhibit 10.2


SIXTH AMENDMENT TO
THE WASHINGTON TRUST COMPANY
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2008
A.WHEREAS, The Washington Trust Company (the “Company”) maintains The Washington Trust Company Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2008, as subsequently amended (the “Plan”), for the benefit of its eligible employees; and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan by action of its Compensation and Human Resources Committee; and
WHEREAS, the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Company has authorized the following amendment to the Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows:
1.Section 12.7 is hereby amended by deleting the second sentence thereof and substituting therefor the following:
“A 401(k) Participant hired prior to October 1, 2007 shall be fully vested at all times in his Employer Account.  A 401(k) Participant hired on or after October 1, 2007 shall become vested in his Employer Account at the earliest of (a) two (2) years of service (as defined in the 401(k) Plan) with a Participating Employer; (b) death; (c) Total and Permanent Disability; or (d) attainment of age 65.  Service with Halsey Associates, Incorporated immediately prior to its acquisition on August 1, 2015 will be recognized in determining service for these purposes.” 
		
	B.
	The effective date of this Sixth Amendment is as of June 18, 2015. 


		
	C.
	In all other respects said Plan is hereby confirmed.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Sixth Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 6th day of August, 2015.


THE WASHINGTON TRUST COMPANY
By:     /s/ Joseph J. MarcAurele        
Joseph J. MarcAurele
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### Scott R. Nortz, as Executor of Richard J. Brown, Deceased, Individually and Doing Business as Gold Cup Farms, Inc. and Another, Appellant, v Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent.

[971 NYS2d 917]

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (James R Mc-Clusky, J.), entered August 1, 2012. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the motion of defendant to compel appraisal.

Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on May 29 and June 6, 2013 and filed in the Jefferson County Clerk’s Office on June 11, 2013,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation. Present — Centra, J.P, Peradotto, Garni and Lindley, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamaal A. Cherry, Appellant.

[971 NYS2d 892]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), imposed January 25, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Skelos, Roman, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 4.1

 

	
Number
   A-
    	
 
    	
Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Delaware
    	
 
    	
Shares
   -0-
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Cusip No.
    


 

LIBERTY INTERACTIVE CORPORATION

 

Series A QVC Group Common Stock, par value $.01 per share

 

Specimen Certificate

 

This Certifies that is the owner of FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF SERIES A QVC GROUP COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE, OF LIBERTY INTERACTIVE CORPORATION (hereinafter called the “Corporation”) transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

 

Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized officers.

 

	
Dated:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Liberty   Interactive Corporation
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
President
    	
Secretary
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Benton H Wilcoxon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Composite Technology Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Composite Technology Corporation.


Date: May 10, 2006

By: /s/ Benton H Wilcoxon
    --------------------------------
    Benton H Wilcoxon
    Chief Executive Officer and
      Acting Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.7



|     |  |                                                                                                                             |  |                                  
|---- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Two American Lane P.O. Box 5150 Greenwich, Connecticut 06831-8150  Joseph J. Allessie Senior Vice President General Counsel |  | Tel 203.861.1031 Fax 203.552.1501



September 14, 2004

Graham Capital Management, LP

Attn: General Counsel/Secretary

Rock Ledge Financial Center

40 Highland Avenue

Rowayton, CT 06853



Re: Advisory Agreements for World Monitor Trust II Series E, Pru-Securities Strategic Trust, Diversified Futures Trust I



Please be advised that it is anticipated that as of October 1, 2004, all the issued and
outstanding shares of capital stock of Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the Prudential Managing Owners) of the above stated Trusts are owned by Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. f/k/a Kenmar Advisory Corp. (the
Kenmar Managing Owner). Therefore, with respect to the various advisory agreements currently in effect by and between the Trusts, the Prudential Managing Owner and you, please be notified that the Kenmar Managing Owner has assumed the
liabilities and obligations of the Prudential Managing Owner thereunder and will continue to satisfy and perform all liabilities and obligations thereunder.



The Kenmar Managing Owner will continue to operate per the existing advisory agreements. If this is acceptable, please sign both copies of this Letter Agreement and
return one copy.



|                                     |  |                                       
|------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|PREFERRED INVESTMENT SOLUTIONS CORP.
|                                     | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Joseph J. Allessie                
|Name:                                |  | Joseph J. Allessie                    
|Title:                               |  | Senior Vice President, General Counsel
|                                    
|ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:             
|                                    
|GRAHAM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP.      
|                                     | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Paul Sedlack                      
|Name:                                |  | Paul Sedlack                          
|Title:                               |  |
y 

Electronic equipment with two input ports - power and communications - can be exposed to damaging 

differences of voltage between the two ports during surge events. To identify and quantify the significant 

variables and their effects during surge events in residential or commercial facilities, a representative 

configuration of the circuitry in a residence (metallic cold water pipe, power and grounding conductors, 

telephone and coaxial cable TV wiring) was set up in the laboratory, under the name of “Upside-Down 

House.” 

To evaluate the threat of surges impinging upon an actual installation, surges of various types, as defined 

standards covering AC power circuits and communications circuits, can be injected at selected points of t

Upside-Down House. Typical surge-protective devices (SPDs) can be placed at suitable locations of the 

Upside-Down House, corresponding to a variety of real-world exposure scenarios. Preliminary experimen

results of two exposure scenarios were reported in a PQA'94 paper (see pdf file “Upsdown surging”). 

Additional measurements and parametric variations are reported here to characterize the impedance of th

various components of the wiring system and the source impedance of the resulting overvoltages appeari

between the ports. 

Filename: Upsdown measure
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
11647.

#### SHEPPARD *v.*THE STATE.

1. A cliarge on the law of voluntary manslaughter was authorized by evidence.

2. Newly discovered evidence which was cumulative and impeaching and *58would not likely produce a different verdict on another trial did not require a new trial.

Decided December 16, 1920.

■ Conviction of voluntary manslaughter; from Jackson superior court — Judge Cobb. May 3, 1920.

P. *Qooley,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. O. Dean, solicitor-general, W. S. Charters,*contra.

Luke, J.

1. The evidence in this case shows that the defendant and Elgie Appleby, who were playing, with others, in a game of cards, engaged in a quarrel, drew pistols, and cursed at each other, and, while they were thus engaged, the defendant shot and killed Appleby. It was not error for the court to charge the law of voluntary manslaughter. *Gann*v. *State,*30 *Ga.*67; *Williams*v. *State,*125 *Ga.*302 (54 S. E. 108); *Findley*v. *State,*125 *Ga.*579 (3) (54 S. E. 106).

2. The newly, discovered evidence was cumulative and impeaching and would not likely produce a different verdict upon another trial of the case. Eor no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 USC § 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with the annual report of Genesis Pharmaceuticals Enterprises, Inc.
(“the Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I,
Elsa Sung, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





(a)
            The
      annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2008 of the
      Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(b)
            Information
      contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
April 10, 2009




/s/
      Elsa SungElsa
      SungChief
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S 3RD QUARTER FORM 10-Q
FOR 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,684
<SECURITIES>                                    11,618
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,587
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,288
<INVENTORY>                                     53,243
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               120,765
<PP&E>                                          32,909
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,593
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 152,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,437
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           142
<OTHER-SE>                                     117,668
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   152,247
<SALES>                                        124,057
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,341
<CGS>                                           70,329
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,545
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,613
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  16
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,706
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,447
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,259
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,259
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-1020

___________

Estate of Sylvester Givens, by James *

Givens and Shirley Givens, Personal *

Representatives, *

*

Plaintiff-Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Forrest City, Arkansas; K. L. Wynne, *

Dispatcher; *

*

Defendants, *

*

Southwestern Bell Telephone Company; *

*

Defendant-Appellee, * Appeals from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

Joe Goff, Chief of Police, Forrest City * District of Arkansas.

Police Department, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Defendant. *

__________

No. 99-1022

__________

Estate of Sylvester Givens, by James *

Givens and Shirley Givens, Personal *

Representatives, *

*
-2-

Plaintiff-Appellee, *

*

v. *

*

Forrest City, Arkansas; K. L. Wynne, *

Dispatcher; *

*

Defendants, *

*

Southwestern Bell Telephone Company; *

*

Defendant-Appellant, *

*

Joe Goff, Chief of Police, Forrest City *

Police Department, *

*

Defendant. *

___________

Submitted: February 7, 2000

Filed: February 11, 2000

___________

Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Sylvester Givens's estate appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary

judgment in favor of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWB) on the estate's

negligence claim after it failed to respond to SWB's request for an admission that

Givens's estate did not have any facts to support its negligence claim. After reviewing

the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude summary judgment was proper. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 36(a) and (b) (matter requested is deemed admitted unless party
-3-

answers, and any matter admitted is "conclusively established" unless party files motion

to withdraw or amend admission); Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c) (summary judgment is properly

granted if the admissions on file show there is no genuine issue as to any material fact).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

We also dismiss SWB's cross-appeal as moot.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

              PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 99.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of
the Quarterly  Report of Provident  Financial Group,  Inc.  ("Provident") on
Form  10-Q  for  the  period  ending  March  31,  2003  (the  "Report"),  I,
Christopher  J.  Carey,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  Provident,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of  operations  of
    Provident.

/s/ Christopher J. Carey
------------------------
Christopher J. Carey
Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2003

[A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to Provident  Financial  Group,  Inc. and will be retained by
Provident Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.]
```
**EXHIBIT 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8s No.333-88848 and 333-128924 and Form S-3s No. 333-133114, 333-126338, 333-114913, 333-111943,333-109757, 333-91568, 333-81338 and 333-60664) of AdStar, Inc. of our report, dated March 11,2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of AdStar, Inc. which report appears in the2006 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of AdStar, Inc.**/S/ HOLTZ RUBENSTEIN REMINICK LLP**
Exhibit 32a

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code

I, Thomas M. OFlynn, Chief Executive Officer of PSE&G Transition Funding LLC, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual Report of PSE&G Transition Funding LLC on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of PSE&G Transition Funding LLC.

/s/ THOMASM. OFLYNNThomas M. OFlynnChief Executive OfficerMarch 14, 2008


---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2159 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2159

     To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. 
   Department of Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Cooperative 
       Endangered Species Conservation Fund for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. 
   Department of Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Cooperative 
       Endangered Species Conservation Fund for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR U.S. DEPARTMENT OF 
              INTERIOR, US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, COOPERATIVE 
              ENDANGERED SPECIES CONSERVATION FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 
              2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for U.S. Department of 
Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Cooperative Endangered Species 
Conservation Fund for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $24,062,000.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JUSTIN DERON COLEMAN, :

AIS 216124,

:

Petitioner,

:

vs. CA 15-0337-WS-C

:

JUDGE BEN BROOKS, et al.,

:

Respondents.

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, 

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that petitioner’s request for habeas corpus relief, 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, be dismissed as time-barred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2244(d). Coleman is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, he is not 

entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.

DONE this 8th day of July, 2016.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00337-WS-C Document 31 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 1