alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RYAM EX10.1 Q2 2015


EXHIBIT 10.1 




RAYONIER ADVANCED MATERIALS
2015 Performance Share Award Program




Performance Measure:  Return on Invested Capital


Performance Period:  January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017 (36 months)


Performance Payout:  0 - 200% of Award Grant, based upon established Share Award Valuation Formula.


Share Award Valuation Formula:  Return on Invested Capital, as measured over a three-year period, with each year being measured independently of the results of other years.  Overall performance will be measured by the summation of performance for each year of the period.


TSR Modifier:  TSR at or above the 75th percentile will result in the application of a +25% multiplier to performance share payouts while TSR at or below the 25th percentile will result in the application of a -25% multiplier to performance share payouts.  There is no multiplier applied to performance share payouts if TSR performance is between the 25th and 75th percentile.


TSR peer group will continue to be the currently used definition of the standard S&P Materials Index with collars applied for revenue (>$500M) and market cap (>$500M - <$5B).


Form of Payout:  Stock


Accrued Dividends/Interest: Dividend equivalents will be accrued and payable at the end of the performance period along with interest on dividends at a rate equal to the prime rate as reported in the Wall Street Journal, adjusted and compounded annually.


Award Date:  January 2, 2015
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the filing of the Annual Report of NewMarket Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities indicated below, certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  April 22, 2010





/s/ Bruce Noller


Name:  Bruce Noller


Title:  Chief Executive Officer





Dated:  April 22, 2010





/s/ Philip J. Rauch


Name:  Philip J. Rauch


Title:  Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

KENNY SAM PIERCE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-0214-CG-M

)

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting 

Commissioner of Social Security,

)

)

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having 

been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that the Petition for Attorney Fees (Doc. 26) be GRANTED

and that Plaintiff’s Attorney, Quinn E. Brock, be AWARDED a fee of $14,124.50.

DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of October, 2016.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:11-cv-00214-CG-M Document 28 Filed 10/05/16 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32(c)


CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


FOR PPL
ENERGY SUPPLY, LLC'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Energy Supply, LLC (the
"Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I,
the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that:





·
            The
      Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and·
            The
      information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.











Date:  November
      4, 2008
            /s/  James
      H. MillerJames
      H. Miller
              President
              PPL
      Energy Supply, LLC








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People v. Samuel McKay.

*Railway stations*— Rights *of expeetm'ating passengers-*

Í Railway passengers are entitled to remain in tlie waiting room at a station ' as long as they have occasion to do so, and commit no offense against the good order of the place and reasonable regulations made to govern it; they are not bound to leave on being ordered out by the keeper for any such indecorum as spitting on, the flooi^Jand the refusal to go on being ordered will not excuse the commission of an: assault and battery upon them to compel them to.

*440A railway station keeper assaulted a passenger for not leaving the waiting room when ordered, the passenger having enraged him by spitting on the floor. *Held,*that in defending an action for the assault and battery a question as to the plaintiffs smoking was irrelevant, where his smoking had not been objected to.

Exceptions before judgment from Cass.

Submitted June 23.

Decided June 29.

Information for assault and battery. Despondent was convicted below.

Affirmed.

Attorney General *Jacob J. Van Riper*for the People.

Words cannot justify an assault: Tiff. Crim. Law *574.*

*Howell & Carr*for respondent.

The keeper of a railway station house is not guilty of assault in ejecting a person if he has no notice or knowledge of his right to remain there: *Com. v. Power 7*Met. 596.

Campbell, J.

McKay was convicted of assault and battery on Thomas Cooley, at the Grand Trunk station at Edwardsburg, in Cass county. McKay was station. keeper, and the assault originated in an altercation between them caused by Cooley’s spitting on the floor. He was smoking at the time, but no objection was made to this, and a question about it was properly held irrelevant. The defendant made a somewhat violent assault, and subsequently called in another servant of the company who compelled Cooley to leave the room, which he had refused to do at the demand of McKay. Cooley was a passenger on a train stopping temporarily at the station.

The court charged the jury very distinctly that if Cooley violated any rule made either by the company or the agent which had been brought home to his knowledge, the respondent had a right to require him to leave the waiting-room, and to remove him by such force as was necessary.

We think this charge was quite strong enough in favor of respondent. It is absurd to claim that the traveling community are bound to govern their behavior by the whims of an obstinate station-house keeper, or to leave the room when*441ever he thinks proper to drive them out. They are invited by the railroad company, and are entitled to remain there so long as they have occasion to do so, and commit no offence against the good order of the place and the reasonable regulations made to govern it.

The conviction was regular, and it must be certified to the court below that the people are entitled to judgment on it.

The other Justices concurred.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edwin Perez, Appellant.

[967 NYS2d 864]

Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Centra, Sconiers and Whalen, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2258 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2258

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Funds for Strengthening 
     Markets, Income, and Supply (Section 32) for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Funds for Strengthening 
     Markets, Income, and Supply (Section 32) for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR US DEPARTMENT OF 
              AGRICULTURE, AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE, FUNDS FOR 
              STRENGTHENING MARKETS, INCOME, AND SUPPLY (SECTION 32) 
              FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for US Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Funds for Strengthening 
Markets, Income, and Supply (Section 32) for fiscal year 2024 may not 
exceed $20,705,000.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2208 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2208

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
of Agriculture, Acquisition of Lands for National Forests Special Acts 
                         for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
of Agriculture, Acquisition of Lands for National Forests Special Acts 
                         for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR US DEPARTMENT OF 
              AGRICULTURE, ACQUISITION OF LANDS FOR NATIONAL FORESTS 
              SPECIAL ACTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for US Department of 
Agriculture, Acquisition of Lands for National Forests Special Acts for 
fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $664,000.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JAMES MOORE, )

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-00463-KD-C

 ) 

TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES )

INCORPORATED PENSION PLAN, et al., )

Defendants. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no objections 

filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(l)(B) and dated March 11, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the amended complaint filed by 

Defendants Teledyne Technologies Incorporated Pension Plan and Plan Administrative Committee 

of the Teledyne Technologies Incorporated Pension Plan (Doc. 69) is GRANTED such that the 

Plaintiff’s claims against those Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE so that the

Plaintiff may refile his claims after exhausting his administrative remedies.

DONE and ORDERED this the 30th day of March 2015. 

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00463-KD-C Document 74 Filed 03/31/15 Page 1 of 1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2271 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Rural Development Programs for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Rural Development Programs for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL 

5 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS FOR FISCAL 

6 YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for US Department of Agriculture, Rural DevelopVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:00 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2271.IH H2271

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2271 IH

1 ment Programs for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $1,580,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134042 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134042 COA: 276892 Kent CC: 05-008645-FC LAYVELL GUY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 24, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ORLANDO CRUZ-PAZ, a.k.a. Lazaro

Benitez Cabrera, a.k.a. Lazaro CabreraBenitez,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-10500

D.C. No. 4:12-cr-01986-JGZ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18, 2015** 

Before: TASHIMA, OWENS, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Orlando Cruz-Paz appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

the 63-month sentence imposed on remand following his guilty-plea conviction for

reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v.

FILED

NOV 23 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Cruz-Paz’s counsel has filed a brief stating that

there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. We have provided Cruz-Paz the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental

brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED. 

2 14-10500
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 01, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 01, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21I0127. MARKERSON CODY GRIFFETH v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 20CR0303
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2063 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Executive Office 

of the President, White House, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Executive Office of the President, White House, Salaries and 

Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, 

5 WHITE HOUSE, SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR 

6 FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Executive Office of the President, White House, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2063 IH

1 Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $55,000,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2310 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of State, 

International Organizations, Contributions to International Organizations 

for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of State, International Organizations, Contributions to International Organizations for fiscal year 

2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2310 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF STATE, INTERNATIONAL 

3 ORGANIZATIONS, CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTER4 NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS FOR FISCAL 

5 YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Department of State, International Organizations, 

9 Contributions to International Organizations for fiscal 

10 year 2024 may not exceed $1,264,030,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
tse_EX_10-2


		
			Exhibit 10.2
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			May 11, 2015
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Mr. Christopher D.  Pappas  
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Dear Mr. Pappas:
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			RE: Definition of Retirement for Purposes of Equity Awards under 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			This letter confirms that the following definition of "Retirement" is applicable to the Stock Options  granted to  you on February 27, 2015:
		

		
			 
		

		
			"Retirement” means (i) a termination of Optionee's Employment by the Company (or its subsidiaries) other than for Cause; (ii) a termination of  Optionee's Employment by the Grantee with "good reason" (with such term having the meaning ascribed thereto in the employment agreement between the Optionee and the Company, or its subsidiaries) ("Good Reason") for so long as such agreement is in effect; (iii) a termination of Optionee's Employment by the Optionee without Good Reason where the Optionee provides the Company with at least 12 months notice of the termination, or (iv) on or after February 26, 2016, a termination of Optionee's Employment by the Optionee without Good Reason.
		

		
			 
		

		
			This letter confirms that the following definition of "Retirement" is applicable to the Restricted Stock Units granted  to  you on February 27, 2015:
		

		
			 
		

		
			"Retirement” means (i) a termination of Grantee's Employment by the Company (or its subsidiaries) other than for Cause; (ii) a termination of Grantee's Employment by the Grantee with "good reason" (with such term having the meaning ascribed thereto in the employment agreement between the Grantee and the Company, or its subsidiaries) ("Good Reason") for so long as such agreement is in effect; (iii) a termination of Grantee's Employment by the Grantee without Good Reason where the Grantee provides the Company with at least 12 months notice of the termination, or (iv) on or after February 26, 2016, a termination of Grantee's Employment by the Grantee without Good Reason.
		

		
			**
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Trinseo S.A.

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ Stephen Zide

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Name:

					
					
						Stephen Zide

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Title:

					
					
						Director
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES/OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report of iBasis, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Richard Tennant, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code, that this Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
| Date: June 8, 2007 | /s/ Richard Tennant              |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                    | Richard Tennant                  |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer          |
|                    | and Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----