alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CEDRIC SCOTT

# 236991,

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0308-CG-M

)

ROBERT GOLDEN, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of 

those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that Defendants Jonathan Rabeau and Robert Golden’s Motion to 

Dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted is GRANTED, and 

Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED this 26th day of February, 2016.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00308-CG-M Document 44 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Timothy Thompson, Respondent.

[609 NYS2d 620]

—Appeal by the People from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Sherman, J.), dated September 23, 1991, which dismissed Count Two of Suffolk County Indictment No. 2232/89 charging the defendant with murder in the second degree (intentional) and, in effect, vacated the defendant’s plea of guilty to that count.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

The defendant was charged with three counts of murder in the second degree (felony murder, intentional murder and depraved indifference murder) after he raped and killed an acquaintance. He subsequently pleaded guilty to the entire indictment without the People’s consent. Prior to sentencing, the County Court dismissed the intentional murder count on the ground that it was inconsistent with the depraved indifference murder count. The defendant was sentenced on the remaining two counts and has begun serving his term of imprisonment.

We agree with the People’s contention that the County Court erred in dismissing the intentional murder count, as the requirements of CPL article 300 with respect to inconsistent counts do not apply to guilty pleas *(see, e.g., People v Walton,*41 NY2d 880). However, under the circumstances of this case, the People’s appeal should be dismissed *(cf., People v Kaplan,*191 AD2d 712). The Supreme Court vacated the defendant’s plea of guilty to the intentional murder count, and this Court lacks the authority to reinstate the plea and may only reinstate the count *(see, People v Reap,*68 AD2d 964). The defendant has commenced serving his sentence, therefore the plea and sentence on the other counts cannot be vacated at the People’s request *(see, People v Moquin,*77 NY2d 449; *see also, Matter of Campbell v Pesce,*60 NY2d 165; *People v Donnelly,*176 AD2d 404), and the People would be precluded on double jeopardy grounds from prosecuting the defendant for intentional murder were that count reinstated *(see, People v Moquin, supra; People v Donnelly, supra).*Moreover, the defendant did not seek to vacate the plea on his direct appeal, and his judgment of conviction was affirmed *(see, People v Thompson,*202 AD2d 456 [decided herewith]). Therefore, although the People’s claim has merit, no corrective action can be taken. Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Florio, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30179]



[[Page 77041]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; National Science Board

    The National Science Board's Executive Committee, pursuant to NSF 
regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as 
amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 
U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference 
for the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 from 2:00 to 4:00 p.m. EST.

SUBJECT MATTER: (1) Chairman's opening remarks; and (2) Discussion of 
agenda for the February 2015 meeting.

STATUS: Open.
    This meeting will be held by teleconference at the National Science 
Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230. A public listening line will be available. Members 
of the public must contact the Board Office [call 703-292-7000 or send 
an email message to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5dbd4c1dcdadbd4d9c6d6dcd0dbd6d0d7c7d1f5dbc6d39bd2dac3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e48a85908d8b8a858897878d818a8781869680a48a9782ca838b92">[email protected]</span></a>] at least 24 hours prior 
to the teleconference for the public listening number.
    Please refer to the National Science Board Web site www.nsf.gov/nsb 
for additional information. Meeting information and updates (time, 
place, subject matter or status of meeting) may be found at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/notices/. Point of contact for this meeting is: James 
Hamos, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-
8000.

Ann Bushmiller,
Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-30179 Filed 12-19-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2136 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, 

Office of Personnel Management, Office of Inspector General, Administrative Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, Office of Personnel Management, Office of Inspector General, Administrative Expenses for 

fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2136 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES, OFFICE OF PER3 SONNEL MANAGEMENT, OFFICE OF INSPEC4 TOR GENERAL, ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES 

5 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Independent Agencies, Office of Personnel Man9 agement, Office of Inspector General, Administrative Ex10 penses for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $25,265,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Comments should be received on or before January 30, 2015 to be assured of consideration.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Send comments regarding the burden estimate, or any other aspect of the information collection, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to (1) Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for Treasury, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, or email at                         *OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.gov*                         and (2) Treasury PRA Clearance Officer, 1750 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Suite 8141, Washington, DC 20220, or email at                         *PRA@treasury.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by emailing                         *PRA@treasury.gov,*                         calling (202) 622-1295, or viewing the entire information collection request at                         *www.reginfo.gov.*

## Departmental Offices

*OMB Number:*                         1505-0228.                    

*Type of Review:*                         Revision of a currently approved collection.                    

*Title:*                         Small Business Lending Fund (SBLF) Supplemental Reports.                    

*Form:*                         TD F 102.3A, TD F 102.4.                    

*Abstract:*                         Once accepted into the SBLF program, the participating bank is required to submit a Supplemental Report each quarter. The Supplemental Report is used to determine the institution's small business lending baseline and allows Treasury to assess the change in the small business lending for the previous quarter.                    

*Affected Public:*                         Businesses or other for-profits.                    

*Estimated Annual Burden Hours:*                         4,032.                    

Brenda Simms,

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 2014-30571 Filed 12-30-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-25-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,580,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               43,944,000
<ALLOWANCES>                              (12,100,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,424,000
<PP&E>                                       5,070,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,494,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    43,394,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,494,000
<SALES>                                      1,235,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,235,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  353,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                882,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            882,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   882,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Jürgen Dormann, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of ABB Ltd;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



5.
The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit
committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: September 24, 2004

|/s/JÜRGEN DORMANNJürgen Dormann
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1879 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of Representatives, Allowance for Compensation of Interns in House Standing, Special 

and Select Committee Offices for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House 

of Representatives, Allowance for Compensation of Interns in House Standing, Special and Select Committee 

Offices for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1879 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, ALLOWANCE 

3 FOR COMPENSATION OF INTERNS IN HOUSE 

4 STANDING, SPECIAL AND SELECT COM5 MITTEE OFFICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for House of Representatives, Allowance for Com9 pensation of Interns in House Standing, Special and Se10 lect Committee Offices for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

11 $0.00. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50906 Conference Calendar

BENNIE FINISTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus THON WILEY NICHOLS, Guard of Texas Department of Criminal Justice; ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-95-CV-345

- - - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The motion filed by Bennie Finister, Texas state prisoner #649506, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED. Finister has failed to identify a nonfrivolous issue for appeal. The district court did not err in certifying that an appeal would be frivolous. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.24 (5th Cir. 1997);O R D E R No. 96-50906 - 2 - 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Finister that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Finister is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MOHAMMED AL-ADAHI, et al., :

:

Petitioners, :

:

v. : Civil Action No. 05-280 (GK)

:

BARACK H. OBAMA, et al., :

:

Respondents. :

ORDER

To ensure that the Guantanamo Review Task Force operating pursuant to Executive Order

13,492 has not made any recommendations -- and the Review Panel in connection with the same has

made no decision -- that would render unnecessary or otherwise inefficient the further expenditure

of judicial and party resources in this matter, it is hereby

ORDERED, that on or before July 20, 2009, in the above-captioned case, Respondents shall

file with the Court ex parte and under seal a report detailing the current status of the Guantanamo

Review Task Force review process with respect to each Petitioner. The report shall inform the Court

as to whether the Guantanamo Review Task Force has made any recommendations regarding the

disposition of Petitioner. If a recommendation regarding the disposition of Petitioner has been made,

the report shall also address whether the Review Panel has made any decisions in connection with

the recommendation. If no recommendation has been made, the report shall provide an estimated

timetable, based on the then-available information, for that recommendation; and it is further
-2-

ORDERED, that Respondents shall be under an affirmative and ongoing obligation to

immediately notify the Court of any changes to Petitioner’s status.

July 8, 2009 /s/ 

Gladys Kessler

United States District Judge

Copies via ECF to all counsel of record
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Humphreys, O’Brien and Senior Judge Bumgardner 

HOWARD CLUTE 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 0252-15-2 PER CURIAM 

 JUNE 9, 2015 

BIG LOTS STORES, INC. AND 

 ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Michael J. Beste; Reinhardt Harper Davis, PLC, on brief), for 

appellant. 

 (Nicholas P. Marrone; Kathryn Lea Harman; Semmes, Bowen & 

Semmes, on brief), for appellees. 

 Howard Clute (“claimant”) appeals the decision of the Workers’ Compensation 

Commission (“commission”) declining to award him disability benefits from August 19, 2013 

and ongoing and by only awarding him disability benefits on August 19, 2013, which was the 

day of his right knee replacement surgery. On appeal, claimant argues the commission 

erroneously (1) held that he failed to sustain his burden of proof for an award of temporary total 

disability from August 19, 2013 and ongoing; and (2) declined to consider his testimony to prove 

his disability, but instead determined that it could only speculate as to a period of disability 

without medical records.1

 We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

1

 Big Lots Stores, Inc. and Arch Insurance Company argue claimant was not entitled to 

disability benefits for his right knee on August 19, 2013 because that claim was barred by the 

doctrine of res judicata. We have determined that the commission did not err in finding that 

claimant’s claim for benefits for his right knee was not barred by res judicata. See Big Lots 

Stores, Inc. v. Clute, Record No. 0206-15-2. 

UNPUBLISHED 
- 2 - 

that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

commission in its opinion. See Clute v. Big Lots Stores, Inc., JCN VA00000420654 (Jan. 14, 

2015). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not 

aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

 Affirmed.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1899 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Joint Items, Office 

of Congressional Accessibility Services, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal 

year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of 

such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Joint 

Items, Office of Congressional Accessibility Services, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


DMWilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1899 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 JOINT ITEMS, OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL 

3 ACCESSIBILITY SERVICES, SALARIES AND EX4 PENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

6 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail7 able for Joint Items, Office of Congressional Accessibility 

8 Services, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may 

9 not exceed $1,486,000. 

Æ 


DMWilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EDDIE LAMANQUIL SMITH,

#12876-003,

)

)

)

Petitioner, )

) CRIMINAL NO. 12-00256-CG-B

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0167-CG-B

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Respondent. )

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order entered this date, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and 

DECREED that Judgment is entered favor of Respondent, the United States of America, and 

against Petitioner, Eddie Lamanquil Smith. In addition, the Court finds that Petitioner is not 

entitled to issuance of a Certificate of Appealability, and therefore, is not entitled to proceed in

forma pauperis on appeal. 

DONE and ORDERED this 9th day of June, 2016.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cr-00256-CG-B Document 79 Filed 06/09/16 Page 1 of 1
----

----

| (i)   | the      annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 of      the Company (the “Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (ii)  | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |      |                                                                          |   |
|---------------------------|--------|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      March 31, 2008 |   | By:  | /s/      Thomas D. Allen                                                      |   |
|                      |   |      | Thomas      D. AllenExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial      Officer |   |

|   |   |      |                                                                     |   |
|--------|--------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | By:  | /s/      Jamie Kellner                                                   |   |
|   |   |      | Jamie      KellnerChief      Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board |   |