alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         143,919
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,192,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                    1,099,163
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,374,169
<PP&E>                                         935,846
<DEPRECIATION>                                 673,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,778,579
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,158,680
<BONDS>                                        400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       488,541
<OTHER-SE>                                     (303,158)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,778,579
<SALES>                                        3,560,713
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,560,713
<CGS>                                          1,941,621
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,941,621
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,062,076
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (12,034)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (453,217)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (453,217)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (453,217)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.14)
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30134]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCO956000 L14200000.BJ0000]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; Colorado

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Colorado State Office is 
publishing this notice to inform the public of the official filing of 
the survey plat listed below. The plat will be available for viewing at 
http://www.glorecords.blm.gov.

DATES: The plat described in this notice was filed on December 8, 2014.

ADDRESSES: BLM Colorado State Office, Cadastral Survey, 2850 Youngfield 
Street, Lakewood, CO 80215-7093.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Bloom, Chief Cadastral Surveyor 
for Colorado, (303) 239-3856.
    Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may 
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to 
contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is 
available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to leave a message or 
question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during 
normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The supplemental plat of Section 20 in 
Township 42 North, Range 9 West, New Mexico Principal Meridian, 
Colorado, was accepted on December 5, 2014, and filed on December 8, 
2014.

Randy Bloom,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado.
[FR Doc. 2014-30134 Filed 12-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES F-3 AND F-4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,829,352
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 15,026,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,131,236
<PP&E>                                      70,775,362
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,501,472
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             108,505,410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,755,948
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       203,194
<OTHER-SE>                                  74,290,690
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               108,505,410
<SALES>                                    245,260,066
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                      165,916,833
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               46,950,130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               270,382
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              69,937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             32,052,784
<INCOME-TAX>                                12,981,378
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         19,071,406
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                311,314
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                18,760,092
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .82


</TABLE>
#### Josette Linton, Respondent, v Eduardo Gonzales et al., Appellants.

[974 NYS2d 350]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Paviola A. Soto, J.), entered on or about March 19, 2013, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint alleging serious injuries under Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.

Defendants made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. They submitted the report of their expert orthopedic surgeon who, based on an examination of plaintiff and review of her medical records and MRI film, concluded that her shoulder symptoms were not caused by the subject accident but were secondary to degeneration, chronic impingement, and diabetes *(McDuffie v Rodriguez,*72 AD3d 568 [1st Dept 2010]). The surgeon also stated that plaintiffs emergency room records and EMS reports noted no complaints of pain in the shoulder.

In opposition, plaintiff failed to provide any contemporaneous objective evidence of injuries to the left shoulder sufficient to raise an issue as to causation *(see Perl v Meher,*18 NY3d 208, 217-218 [2011]; *Jean v Kabaya,*63 AD3d 509, 510 [1st Dept 2009]). Reports from her chiropractor and neurologist show only treatment to the spine, and make no mention of any left *535shoulder injuries. Although the affirmation and reports of plaintiffs orthopedic surgeon show range of motion limitations, positive impingement sign, and a tear in the left shoulder, he did not evaluate the left shoulder until about eight months after the accident, which is insufficient to raise an issue as to causation *(Rosa v Mejia,*95 AD3d 402, 403-404 [1st Dept 2012]; *Soho v Konate,*85 AD3d 522, 523 [1st Dept 2011]).

Given the lack of evidence of causation, plaintiff cannot establish her 90/180-day injury claim (see *Barry v Arias,*94 AD3d 499, 500 [1st Dept 2012]). Concur — Acosta, J.P., Saxe, Renwick, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.
EXHBIT 10.12

                                LETTER OF INTENT

This document shall serve as a "Letter of Intent" for Bentley Communications
Corp. and Jinjiang Electrical Industrial Co., Ltd. to explore cooperation in
several fields. Both parties have agreed to the following actions.

1.       Digital Video Reciever (DVR)
-------------------------------------

a.       Bentley shall provide product specifications
b.       Jinjiang shall produce a procurement, assembly plant and cost analysis

2.       Paper Shredder
-----------------------

a.       Bentley shall provide product specifications and 3 sample copies for
         each model
b.       Jinjiang shall produce a procurement, assembly plan and cost analysis

3.       Biometric Authentication system
----------------------------------------

a.       Bentley shall provide general product development guidance and shall
         market such a system through 1 or more of Bentley's website(s). The BAS
         shall have the following but not limited to:
         1.       Function under several Operating Systems such as CE, Win98,
                  Win2K, Citrix, and Linux
         2.       Software shall have a very competitive price
         3.       Have a 99.5% or better authentication accuracy
         4.       Compatible with 79% or more of all cameras currently
                  available.
b.       Jinjiang shall produce a procurement, assembly plan and cost analysis



Witness:  ROCTECH HK Co. Ltd.                  Jinjiang Electric Industrial Co.,
                                               Ltd.

/s/ Patrick Rocillo                            /s/ Tang Hou Long
-------------------------------------          ---------------------------------
Patrick Rocillo/CEO & President                Tang Hou Long/President

Bentley Communications Corp.

/s/ Gordon F. Lee.
------------------------------------
Gordon F. Lee/ CEO&President


                                                                              50
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78783-78784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30627]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Agency: U.S. Census Bureau.
    Title: Census Employment Inquiry.
    OMB Control Number: 0607-0139.
    Form Number(s): BC-170A, BC-170B, BC-170D.
    Type of Request: Extension of Previously Approved Collection.
    Number of Respondents: 65,000.
    Average Hours per Response: 15 minutes.
    Burden Hours: 16,250.
    Needs and Uses: The Census Bureau proposed using a revised 
employment form, however based upon program needs we have decided not 
to use the revised form at this time. We will use the existing form for 
our recruitment needs in 2015 and explore revising the employment 
inquiry form in the future.
    Job applicants complete the BC-170 (A, B, and D) before, or at the 
time, they are tested. Selecting officials will review the information 
shown on the form and determine the applicant's employment suitability. 
Failure to collect this information could result in the hiring of 
unsuitable and/or unqualified workers.
    Information quality is an integral part of the pre-dissemination 
review of the information disseminated by the Census Bureau (fully 
described in the Census Bureau's Information Quality Guidelines). 
Information quality is also integral to the information collections 
conducted by the Census Bureau and is incorporated into the clearance 
process required by the Paperwork Reduction Act.

[[Page 78784]]

    Affected Public: Applicants for temporary jobs in office and field 
positions.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory to apply for temporary 
positions.
    Legal Authority: Title 13, United States Code, Section 23 a and c.
    This information collection request may be viewed at 
www.reginfo.gov .Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce 
collections currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8f7f1eaf9e7ebcddad5d1cbcbd1d7d6f8d7d5da96ddd7c896dfd7ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7a3533283b25290f18171309091315143a151718541f150a541d150c">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to (202) 395-5806.

    Dated: December 24, 2014.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-30627 Filed 12-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF POHL, MCNABOLA, BERG & COMPANY, LLP



               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants




We consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of AccuImage
Diagnostics Corp. of our report dated December 19, 2001, relating to the
financial statements of AccuImage Diagnostics Corp., which appear in such Annual
Report. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in
such Annual Report.



/s/ Pohl, McNabola, Berg & Company, LLP



Pohl, McNabola, Berg & Company, LLP
San Francisco, CA
January 10, 2001


















                                      -5-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0 484 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ANDREW JOHN SMITH,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 23 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 17 2023

07/17/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0484
11731.

#### Citizens Bank of Bainbridge *v.*McLeod.

Decided December 15, 1920.

Garnishment.; from city court of Bainbridge — Judge Spooner. June 21, 1920.

*J. C. Hale,*for plaintiff in error.

*T. S. names,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

1. This court has no original jurisdiction, but is a court for the correction of errors of law only. It cannot pass upon a question as to the jurisdiction of a trial court where such question is raised for tlie first time in this court, even though it appear from the face of the record that the trial court had no jurisdiction of the subject-matter before it. *Fox*v. *State,*150 *Ga.*673 (104 S. E. 631).

*(a)*In the instant case a judgment was obtained in the superior court of Decatur county, and the garnishment proceedings based thereon, although properly made returnable to that court, were filed in the city court of Bainbridge, and subsequently a judgment against the garnishee was rendered in the last-named court. The garnishee appeared in the city court, filed an answer, and was present upon the hearing of the case, but did not in any way, on the trial or subsequently, raise in the *trial court*the question that it had no jurisdiction in the ease. That question was raised for the first time by the bill of exceptions in this court, and, therefore, under the above ruling of the Supreme Court, cannot be considered.

2. The answer of the garnishee not having been filed within the time allowed by law, and the record not disclosing a legally sufficient reason why is was not so filed, the court did not err in striking it.

*(a)*It does not appear that the garnishee filed, or asked leave to file, an answer after the amendment of the return of service by the sheriff.

3. Although the plaintiff in error contends that the judgment was rendered without the introduction of any evidence, and the bill of exceptions so recites, the judgment itself (which is specified and brought up as a part of the record) recites, in effect, that it is based upon “ evidence properly submitted.” It is well settled that where there is a conflict as to statements of fact between a bill of exceptions and the record, the latter controls.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 18.1

J.L. French Automotive Castings, Inc.
3101 South Taylor Drive Post Office Box 1024
Sheboygan, Wisconsin 53082-1024

March 22, 2002

Gentlemen/Ladies:

Re: Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2001

This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a
letter from a registrant's independent accountants whenever there has been a
change in accounting principle or practice.

During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company changed its method of
applying Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) 87, "Employers'
Accounting for Pensions" so that the fair value of it's pension plans
accumulated benefit obligation and the fair value of the plan assets are
measured as of October 31, within 90 days of year end as permitted under
paragraph 52 of SFAS 87. The Company also changed its method of applying SFAS
106, "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions" so
that the measurement of plan assets and obligations are measured as of October
31, within 90 days of year end as permitted under paragraph 72 of SFAS 106.
Previously, such amounts were measured as of December 31 of each year. According
to the management of the Company, these changes were made to enable the Company
to have the actuary's valuations prepared prior to preparing the year end
financial statements which enables the Company to disclose the valuations based
upon the actuarial assessments rather than estimates of the fair value.

A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining
the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable alternative
principles has not been established by the accounting profession. Thus, we
cannot make an objective determination of whether the changes in accounting
described in the preceding paragraph are to a preferable method. However, we
have reviewed the pertinent factors, including those related to financial
reporting, in these particular cases on a subjective basis, and our opinion
stated below is based on our determination made in this manner.

We are of the opinion that the Company's changes in methods of accounting are to
acceptable alternative methods of accounting, which, based upon the reasons
stated for the changes and our discussions with you, are also preferable under
the circumstances in these particular cases. In arriving at this opinion, we
have relied on the business judgment and business planning of your management.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

                                     - 81 -
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2159 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. Department 

of Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. 

Department of Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund for 

fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2159 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, US FISH 

3 AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, COOPERATIVE EN4 DANGERED SPECIES CONSERVATION FUND 

5 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for U.S. Department of Interior, US Fish and Wild9 life Service, Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation 

10 Fund for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $24,062,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

                                EXHIBIT 99.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of
the Quarterly  Report of Provident  Financial Group,  Inc.  ("Provident") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 (the  "Report"),  I, Robert L.
Hoverson,  Chief  Executive  Officer of Provident,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.   Section   1350,   as  adopted   pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Provident.

/s/ Robert L. Hoverson
----------------------
Robert L. Hoverson
Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2002
```
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ADEL FRANCIS MOUAWAD, )

)

Petitioner, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0007-CG-C

vs. )

) CRIMINAL NO. 13-0217-CG-C

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Respondent. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all issues raised, and there having been 

no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated July 6, 2015 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this 

Court.

DONE and ORDERED this 21st day of July, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cr-00217-CG-C Document 57 Filed 07/21/15 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ERICA NASHVILLE-HYTER, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 14-410-KD-C

SHERLENE NASHVILLE WHITE, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to 

the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and 

Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of 

this Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED

without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or in the alternative, as a 

sanction for failure to obey the Court’s order.

DONE and ORDERED this the 15th day of June 2015. 

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00410-KD-C Document 12 Filed 06/15/15 Page 1 of 1