UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                  Form 10-QSB/A

(Mark One)
[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
         OF 1934

                 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002


[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
         OF 1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-10304


                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
         (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                              95-3557899
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

The issuer  recently  discovered  that it had  inadvertently  omitted  conformed
signatures on certain certifications included in its 10-QSB filing made November
14, 2002.  Original  signatures were complete and on file with the issuer at the
time the 10-QSB filing was made in November;  however,  due to a clerical error,
conformed  signatures were not included in the electronic filing. This amendment
is being filed solely to correct this inadvertent clerical error.

                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION



ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                               September 30, 2002

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Assets
<S>                                                                        <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                               $   121
   Receivables and deposits                                                     41
   Restricted escrows                                                          103
   Other assets                                                                189
   Investment properties:
      Land                                                 $    312
      Buildings and related personal property                10,605
                                                             10,917
      Less accumulated depreciation                          (7,965)         2,952
                                                                           $ 3,406

Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                         $  209
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                          33
   Accrued property taxes                                                       38
   Other liabilities                                                           156
   Mortgage notes payable                                                    8,431

Partners' Deficit
   General partners                                        $   (247)
   Limited partners (18,625 units issued and
      outstanding)                                           (5,214)        (5,461)
                                                                           $ 3,406


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>






                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                           Three Months Ended      Nine months Ended
                                             September 30,           September 30,
                                            2002        2001        2002        2001
Revenues:
<S>                                        <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>
  Rental income                            $ 556       $ 584      $ 1,712     $ 1,759
  Other income                                 72          44         175         127
        Total revenues                        628         628       1,887       1,886

Expenses:
  Operating                                   243         248         696         694
  General and administrative                   51          51         161         163
  Depreciation                                119         122         381         370
  Interest                                    172         173         518         521
  Property taxes                               50          48         154         135
        Total expenses                        635         642       1,910       1,883

Net (loss) income                           $ (7)      $ (14)      $ (23)       $ 3

Net (loss) income allocated to
  general partners (1%)                     $ --        $ --        $ --        $ --
Net (loss) income allocated to
  limited partners (99%)                       (7)        (14)        (23)          3
                                            $ (7)      $ (14)      $ (23)       $ 3
 Net (loss) income per limited
   partnership unit                        $ (.38)     $ (.75)    $ (1.23)     $ .16
Distribution per limited
  partnership unit                          $ --       $ 8.27       $ --       $ 8.27

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


<PAGE>


                                 ANGELES PARTNERS X
               CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                       Limited
                                     Partnership     General      Limited
                                        Units        Partners    Partners     Total

<S>                                    <C>             <C>        <C>        <C>
Original capital contributions         18,714          $ 1        $18,714    $18,715

Partners' deficit at
   December 31, 2001                   18,625         $ (247)     $(5,191)   $(5,438)

Net loss for the nine months
   ended September 30, 2002                --             --          (23)       (23)

Partners' deficit
   at September 30, 2002               18,625         $ (247)     $(5,214)   $(5,461)

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>


                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Nine Months Ended
                                                                   September 30,
                                                                  2002         2001
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                              <C>           <C>
  Net (loss) income                                              $ (23)        $ 3
  Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash
   provided by operating activities:
   Depreciation                                                     381          370
   Amortization of discounts and loan costs                          32           32
   Bad debt expense                                                  49           14
   Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                      (51)          47
      Other assets                                                  (57)         (59)
      Accounts payable                                              (48)          45
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                            12            6
      Accrued property taxes                                         38           30
      Due to General Partner                                         (2)           1
      Other liabilities                                              69           (7)
       Net cash provided by operating activities                    400          482

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (127)        (374)
  Net withdrawals from restricted escrows                             1           29
       Net cash used in investing activities                       (126)        (345)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage notes payable                               (100)         (93)
  Advances from General Partner                                      --           88
  Payments on advances from General Partner                        (137)          --
  Distributions to partners                                          --         (156)
       Net cash used in financing activities                       (237)        (161)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                 37          (24)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                     84          158

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                       $ 121        $ 134

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest                                           $ 487        $ 489

At September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2000, approximately $174,000 and $83,000,
respectively,  of  property  improvements  and  replacements  were  included  in
accounts payable.

              See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>


                               ANGELES PARTNERS X
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Angeles Partners
X (the  "Partnership"  or  "Registrant")  have been prepared in accordance  with
generally accepted accounting  principles for interim financial  information and
with  the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and Item  310(b)  of  Regulation  S-B.
Accordingly,  they do not include all of the information and footnotes  required
by generally accepted accounting  principles for complete financial  statements.
The general partner responsible for management of the Partnership's  business is
Angeles Realty  Corporation (the "General  Partner" or "ARC"). In the opinion of
the General Partner,  all adjustments  (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.  Operating
results for the three and nine month  periods  ended  September 30, 2002 are not
necessarily  indicative  of the results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2002. For further information,  refer to the consolidated financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's  Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December  31,  2001.  The  General  Partner is a
wholly  owned  subsidiary  of  Apartment   Investment  and  Management   Company
("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust.

Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the General Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The Partnership  Agreement  provides for (i) certain  payments to affiliates for
services and (ii)  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on
behalf of the Partnership.

During the nine months  ended  September  30, 2002 and 2001,  affiliates  of the
General  Partner  were  entitled  to  receive  5% of  gross  receipts  from  the
Registrant's   properties  for  providing  property  management  services.   The
Registrant  paid to such  affiliates  approximately  $97,000 and $94,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001,  respectively.  These amounts are
included in operating expenses.

An  affiliate  of the General  Partner  received  reimbursement  of  accountable
administrative expenses amounting to approximately $128,000 and $163,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001,  respectively.  Included in these
amounts are fees  related to  construction  management  services  provided by an
affiliate of the General  Partner of  approximately  $32,000 and $67,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001,  respectively.  The  construction
management  service  fees  are  calculated  based  on a  percentage  of  current
additions to  investment  properties.  These amounts are included in general and
administrative expenses and investment properties.

In accordance  with the  Partnership  Agreement,  the General Partner loaned the
Partnership funds during the third and fourth quarters of 2001, to cover capital
improvements  at  Greentree  Apartments.  Interest was charged at the prime rate
plus 2%.  Interest  expense  was  approximately  $2,000  and $1,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2002, and 2001, respectively.  During the nine months
ended September 30, 2002, the Partnership repaid this loan. The Partnership made
principal   payments  of  approximately   $137,000  and  interest   payments  of
approximately  $4,000  to the  General  Partner  during  the nine  months  ended
September 30, 2002. Subsequent to September 30, 2002, the General Partner loaned
the Partnership approximately $147,000 to cover capital improvements at Carriage
Hills Apartments.

The Partnership  Agreement provides for a fee equal to 5% of "net cash flow from
operations",  as defined in the Partnership Agreement, to be paid to the General
Partner for executive and administrative services. The Partnership accrued a fee
of  approximately  $8,000  to the  General  Partner  for the nine  months  ended
September  30,  2002,  which is  included in other  liabilities  and general and
administrative  expense.  No such  management  fee was accrued or earned for the
nine months ended September 30, 2001.

Pursuant  to the  Partnership  Agreement,  the  General  Partner is  entitled to
receive a distribution  equal to 4% of the aggregate  disposition  price of sold
properties.  The  Partnership  paid a distribution  of $154,000,  to the General
Partner related to the sale of Vista Hills Apartments in 1999. This distribution
is  subordinate  to  the  limited  partners  receiving  their  original  capital
contributions  plus a  cumulative  preferred  return  of 6% per  annum  of their
adjusted capital  investment,  as defined in the Partnership  Agreement.  If the
limited   partners  have  not  received  these  returns  when  the   Partnership
terminates, the General Partner will return this amount to the Partnership.

Beginning in 2001, the  Partnership  began insuring its properties up to certain
limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally  self-insured for a
portion of losses and  liabilities  related  to workers  compensation,  property
casualty and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the
AIMCO  limits  through  insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers
unaffiliated  with the General  Partner.  During the nine months ended September
30,  2002 and 2001,  the  Partnership  was  charged by AIMCO and its  affiliates
approximately $30,000 and $33,000, respectively, for insurance coverage and fees
associated with policy claims administration.

Note C - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their  affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purports to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial
dissolution of the  Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General  Partner filed a
motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The General Partner filed demurrers to
the amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On July 10,  2001,  the Court  issued  an order  sustaining
defendants'  demurrer on certain grounds.  On July 20, 2001,  Plaintiffs filed a
motion for  reconsideration  of the Court's July 10, 2001 order granting in part
and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001, Plaintiffs filed
a fourth amended class and derivative action  complaint.  On September 12, 2001,
the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On October 5, 2001, the
General Partner and affiliated defendants filed a demurrer to the fourth amended
complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001. On February 2, 2002, the Court
served its order granting in part the demurrer.  The Court has dismissed without
leave  to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'  claims.  On  February  11,  2002,
plaintiffs  filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class  comprised of all
non-affiliated  persons  who own or have owned  units in the  partnerships.  The
General Partner and affiliated  defendants oppose the motion. On April 29, 2002,
the Court held a hearing on plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took
the matter under submission after further briefing, as ordered by the court, was
submitted by the parties.  On July 10, 2002, the Court entered an order vacating
the  current  trial  date of  January  13,  2003 (as well as the  pre-trial  and
discovery cut-off dates) and stayed the case in its entirety through November 7,
2002 so that the  parties  can have an  opportunity  to discuss  settlement.  On
October  30,  2002,  the court  entered  an order  extending  the stay in effect
through January 10, 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the General Partner and affiliated defendants
moved to strike the first  amended  complaint in its entirety for  violating the
Court's  July 10, 2001 order  granting  in part and denying in part  defendants'
demurrer in the Nuanes action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of
the  complaint  based on the statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the
action demurred to the fourth amended complaint,  and,  alternatively,  moved to
strike the  complaint.  On December  11, 2001,  the court heard  argument on the
motions and took the matters under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court
served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the Heller
complaint  as a violation  of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On
March 27, 2002, the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking the
complaint. The parties are currently in the midst of briefing that appeal.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any  costs,  whether  legal or
settlement  costs,   associated  with  these  cases  will  be  material  to  the
Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.


<PAGE>




ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The Private  Securities  Litigation  Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor"
for forward-looking  statements in certain circumstances.  The matters discussed
in this report contain certain forward-looking  statements,  including,  without
limitation,  statements regarding future financial performance and the effect of
government regulations. The discussions of the Registrant's business and results
of operations,  including forward-looking statements pertaining to such matters,
do not take into account the effects of any changes to the Registrant's business
and  results of  operations.  Actual  results may differ  materially  from those
described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a variety of
risks and factors  including,  without  limitation:  national and local economic
conditions; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the Registrant and
interpretations of those regulations;  the competitive  environment in which the
Registrant  operates;  financing risks,  including the risk that cash flows from
operations  may be  insufficient  to meet  required  payments of  principal  and
interest;  real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and the
general  economic  climate in local markets and  competition for tenants in such
markets; and possible environmental liabilities. Readers should carefully review
the Registrant's financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the risk
factors  described in the documents the Registrant  files from time to time with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment properties consist of two apartment complexes. The
following table sets forth the average occupancy of the Partnership's properties
for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001:

                                                   Average Occupancy
      Property                                      2002       2001

      Greentree Apartments                          95%        96%
        Mobile, Alabama
      Carriage Hills Apartments                     92%        95%
        East Lansing, Michigan

The General  Partner  attributes  the decrease in  occupancy  at Carriage  Hills
Apartments to increased market competition in the East Lansing area.

Results of Operations

The Registrant's net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002
was approximately $7,000 and $23,000, respectively, as compared to a net loss of
approximately  $14,000 and net income of approximately  $3,000 for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2001, respectively. The decrease in net loss for
the three months ended  September 30, 2002 is due to a slight  decrease in total
expenses.  The  decrease in net income for the nine months ended  September  30,
2002 is due to an increase in total expenses. Total revenues remained relatively
constant for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002.

The decrease in total expenses for the three months ended  September 30, 2002 is
due to a slight  decrease in  operating  expenses.  The  decrease  in  operating
expenses  for the three  months ended  September  30, 2002 is  primarily  due to
decreases in payroll  related  expenses and  maintenance  expense at both of the
Partnership's  investment  properties.  Operating  expenses remained  relatively
constant for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Total expenses  increased
for  the  nine  months  ended  September  30,  2002  due to  increases  in  both
depreciation and property tax expense.  Depreciation  expense  increased for the
nine months ended  September 30, 2002 due to an increase in  depreciable  assets
resulting from property improvements and replacements  completed during the past
twelve  months.  Property  tax  expense  increased  for the  nine  months  ended
September  30, 2002  primarily due to an increase in the tax rate at both of the
Partnership's  investment  properties  and an increase in the assessed  value at
Carriage  Hills  Apartments.  Depreciation  and property  tax expenses  remained
relatively  constant for the three months ended September 30, 2002.  General and
administrative and interest expenses remained  relatively  constant for both the
three and nine  months  ended  September  30,  2002.  Included  in  general  and
administrative  expenses  at both  September  30,  2002 and 2001 are  management
reimbursements   to  the  General  Partner  as  allowed  under  the  Partnership
Agreement.  In  addition,   costs  associated  with  the  quarterly  and  annual
communications  with  investors  and  regulatory  agencies  and the annual audit
required by the Partnership Agreement are also included.

Total revenues remained  relatively  constant for both the three and nine months
ended  September  30,  2002,  as a  decrease  in rental  income was offset by an
increase in other income.  Other income increased  primarily due to increases in
laundry  income at both  properties,  utility  reimbursements  at Carriage Hills
Apartments, and lease cancellation fees at Greentree Apartments. The decrease in
rental income is primarily  due to the decrease in occupancy at both  properties
and an increase in bad debt expense at Greentree Apartments, partially offset by
an increase in the average rental rate at both properties.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the General  Partner
monitors the rental market  environment of each of its investment  properties to
assess the feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy
levels and protecting  the  Partnership  from increases in expenses.  As part of
this plan,  the General  Partner  attempts to protect the  Partnership  from the
burden of  inflation-related  increases  in  expenses  by  increasing  rents and
maintaining a high overall  occupancy  level.  However,  due to changing  market
conditions,  which  can  result  in the use of  rental  concessions  and  rental
reductions to offset softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the
General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  September  30,  2002,  the  Partnership  had cash and  cash  equivalents  of
approximately  $121,000,  compared to  approximately  $134,000 at September  30,
2001. The increase in cash and cash equivalents of approximately $37,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2002, from the Partnership's  calendar year end,
is due to  approximately  $400,000  of cash  provided by  operating  activities,
partially offset by approximately  $237,000 of cash used in financing activities
and approximately  $126,000 of cash used in investing  activities.  Cash used in
investing   activities   consisted   primarily  of  property   improvements  and
replacements.  Cash  used in  financing  activities  consisted  of  payments  on
advances  from  the  General  Partner  and  payments  of  principal  made on the
mortgages encumbering the Registrant's  properties.  The Partnership invests its
working capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures  required at the investment  properties to adequately  maintain the
physical  assets and other  operating needs of the Registrant and to comply with
Federal, state and local legal and regulatory requirements.  The General Partner
monitors  developments  in the area of legal and  regulatory  compliance  and is
studying  new  federal  laws,  including  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002.  The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests  additional  compliance measures
with regard to governance,  disclosure, audit and other areas. In light of these
changes,  the Partnership  expects that it will incur higher expenses related to
compliance,  including  increased  legal and audit  fees.  Capital  improvements
planned for the Partnership's properties are detailed below.

Greentree  Apartments:  For  2002 the  Partnership  has  budgeted  approximately
$65,000 for capital improvements, consisting primarily of floor covering and air
conditioning unit replacements.  The Partnership completed approximately $30,000
in capital  expenditures  at  Greentree  Apartments  as of  September  30, 2002,
consisting  primarily of floor covering  replacement.  These  improvements  were
funded   primarily  from   operations  and  replacement   reserves.   Additional
improvements may be considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the
property as well as the  anticipated  cash flow  generated  by the  property and
availability of replacement reserves.

Carriage Hills Apartments:  For 2002 the Partnership has budgeted  approximately
$324,000 for capital  improvements,  consisting primarily of window replacement,
roofing  upgrades,  signage,  and floor covering  replacement.  The  Partnership
completed  approximately  $271,000 in capital  expenditures  at  Carriage  Hills
Apartments as of September 30, 2002, consisting primarily of window replacement,
signage,  air  conditioning  and  water  heater  upgrades,  and  floor  covering
replacement.  These  improvements  were funded from  operations and  replacement
reserves.  Additional  improvements  may be  considered  and will  depend on the
physical  condition  of the  property  as  well  as the  anticipated  cash  flow
generated by the property and availability of replacement reserves.

The additional  capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available
from  operations  and  Partnership  reserves.  To the extent that such  budgeted
capital improvements are completed, the Registrant's distributable cash flow, if
any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The  Registrant's  current assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term
needs  (exclusive  of capital  improvements)  of the  Registrant.  The  mortgage
indebtedness of approximately $8,431,000,  net of discount, matures October 2003
and December  2004 with balloon  payments due at maturity.  The General  Partner
will attempt to refinance such indebtedness  and/or sell the properties prior to
such  maturity  dates.  If the  properties  cannot be  refinanced  or sold for a
sufficient  amount,  the  Registrant  will risk losing such  properties  through
foreclosure.

The Partnership  distributed the following  amounts during the nine months ended
September 30, 2002 and 2001 (in the thousands, except per unit data):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                      Nine Months                      Nine Months
                         Ended         Per Limited        Ended         Per Limited
                     September 30,     Partnership    September 30,     Partnership
                          2002            Unit             2001             Unit

<S>                     <C>              <C>               <C>             <C>
Operations              $   --           $   --            $156            $ 8.27
</TABLE>

Future cash  distributions  will depend on the levels of net cash generated from
operations, the availability of cash reserves and the timing of debt maturities,
refinancings,  and/or  property  sales.  The  Registrant's  cash  available  for
distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. There can be no assurance, however,
that the  Partnership  will generate  sufficient  funds from  operations,  after
required  capital  expenditures,  to permit any  distributions  to its  partners
during  the  remainder  of  2002 or  subsequent  periods.  Distributions  may be
restricted by the requirement to deposit net operating income (as defined in the
mortgage note) into the Reserve  Account until the Reserve  Account is funded in
an amount equal to $200 to $400 per apartment unit for Greentree  Apartments for
a total of $35,600 to $71,200.  As of September 30, 2002,  the  Partnership  has
deposits of approximately $71,000 in the reserve account.

Other

In addition to its indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interests in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  owned 10,954 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 58.81% of the outstanding Units at
September  30,  2002. A number of these Units were  acquired  pursuant to tender
offers  made by  AIMCO  or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its
affiliates will acquire additional units of limited partnership  interest in the
Partnership  in  exchange  for cash or a  combination  of cash and  units in the
operating  partnership  of AIMCO  either  through  private  purchases  or tender
offers. Under the Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders holding a majority of the
Units are  entitled to take action  with  respect to a variety of matters  which
would  include  voting on certain  amendments to the  Partnership  Agreement and
voting to remove the General Partner.  As a result of its ownership of 58.81% of
the outstanding  Units,  AIMCO is in a position to control all voting  decisions
with  respect to the  Registrant.  Although the General  Partner owes  fiduciary
duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the General Partner also owes
fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole  stockholder.  As a result,  the duties of
the General  Partner,  as general  partner,  to the  Partnership and its limited
partners may come into conflict with the duties of the General Partner to AIMCO,
as its sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States which require the Partnership
to  make  estimates  and  assumptions.  The  Partnership  believes  that  of its
significant  accounting  policies,  the following may involve a higher degree of
judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Investment  properties  are  recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying  amount of a property may be  impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's  investment  properties.  These  factors  include  changes  in the
national,  regional and local economic  climate;  local  conditions,  such as an
oversupply  of  multifamily   properties;   competition   from  other  available
multifamily  property  owners and changes in market  rental  rates.  Any adverse
changes in these factors could cause an impairment in the Partnership's assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
Rental income  attributable to leases is recognized monthly as it is earned. The
Partnership will offer rental concessions during  particularly slow months or in
response  to  heavy  competition  from  other  similar  complexes  in the  area.
Concessions are charged to income as incurred.

ITEM 3.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The principal  executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing
General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive
officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  have, within 90 days of
the filing date of this quarterly  report,  evaluated the  effectiveness  of the
Partnership's  disclosure  controls and  procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules  (13a-14(c)  and  (15d-14(c))  and have  determined  that such  disclosure
controls and procedures are adequate.  There have been no significant changes in
the Partnership's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
affect the  Partnership's  internal  controls since the date of evaluation.  The
Partnership does not believe any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses
exist in the Partnership's internal controls. Accordingly, no corrective actions
have been taken.


<PAGE>


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their  affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purports to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial
dissolution of the  Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General  Partner filed a
motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The General Partner filed demurrers to
the amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On July 10,  2001,  the Court  issued  an order  sustaining
defendants'  demurrer on certain grounds.  On July 20, 2001,  Plaintiffs filed a
motion for  reconsideration  of the Court's July 10, 2001 order granting in part
and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001, Plaintiffs filed
a fourth amended class and derivative action  complaint.  On September 12, 2001,
the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On October 5, 2001, the
General Partner and affiliated defendants filed a demurrer to the fourth amended
complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001. On February 2, 2002, the Court
served its order granting in part the demurrer.  The Court has dismissed without
leave  to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'  claims.  On  February  11,  2002,
plaintiffs  filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class  comprised of all
non-affiliated  persons  who own or have owned  units in the  partnerships.  The
General Partner and affiliated  defendants oppose the motion. On April 29, 2002,
the Court held a hearing on plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took
the matter under submission after further briefing, as ordered by the court, was
submitted by the parties.  On July 10, 2002, the Court entered an order vacating
the  current  trial  date of  January  13,  2003 (as well as the  pre-trial  and
discovery cut-off dates) and stayed the case in its entirety through November 7,
2002 so that the  parties  can have an  opportunity  to discuss  settlement.  On
October  30,  2002,  the court  entered  an order  extending  the stay in effect
through January 10, 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the General Partner and affiliated defendants
moved to strike the first  amended  complaint in its entirety for  violating the
Court's  July 10, 2001 order  granting  in part and denying in part  defendants'
demurrer in the Nuanes action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of
the  complaint  based on the statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the
action demurred to the fourth amended complaint,  and,  alternatively,  moved to
strike the  complaint.  On December  11, 2001,  the court heard  argument on the
motions and took the matters under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court
served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the Heller
complaint  as a violation  of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On
March 27, 2002, the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking the
complaint. The parties are currently in the midst of briefing that appeal.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any  costs,  whether  legal or
settlement  costs,   associated  with  these  cases  will  be  material  to  the
Partnership's overall operations.


<PAGE>



ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a) Exhibits:

                  Exhibit  3.1,  Amended  Certificate  and  Agreement of Limited
                  Partnership  dated  June 24,  1980,  filed in Form 10-K  dated
                  October 31, 1982, and is incorporated herein by reference.

                  Exhibit 99, Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                  Financial Officer.

            b) Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended September 30, 2002.


<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    ANGELES PARTNERS X


                                    By:   Angeles Realty Corporation
                                          Its General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Chief Accounting Officer


                                    Date: January 9, 2003


<PAGE>



                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Patrick J. Foye, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Angeles Partners X;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


      a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
      material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,   including   its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;


      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing  date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c)  Presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
      effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


      a) All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process,  summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


      b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
      controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: November 13, 2002

                                /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                Patrick J. Foye
                                Executive   Vice  President  of  Angeles  Realty
                                Corporation,  equivalent of the chief  executive
                                officer of the Partnership


<PAGE>



                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Paul J. McAuliffe, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Angeles Partners X;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


      a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
      material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,   including   its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;


      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing  date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c)  Presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
      effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


      a) All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process,  summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


      b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
      controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: November 13, 2002

                                    /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                                    Officer  of  Angeles   Realty   Corporation,
                                    equivalent of the chief financial officer of
                                    the Partnership


<PAGE>


Exhibit 99


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                   Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Angeles  Partners X
(the "Partnership"),  for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
Patrick  J.  Foye,  as the  equivalent  of the chief  executive  officer  of the
Partnership,  and Paul J.  McAuliffe,  as the equivalent of the chief  financial
officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Name:  Patrick J. Foye
                                    Date:  November 13, 2002


                                           /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Name:  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Date:  November 13, 2002

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the  Partnership for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.