alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1CertificationI, Leslie Bernhard, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of AdStar, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of,and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15-(e)) for the small business issuer andhave: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small businessissuer’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the small businessissuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the smallbusiness issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thesmall business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 

 
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting.Date: March 30, 2007                                                                               /s/ Leslie Bernhard   Leslie Bernhard   Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0584

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

WILLIE ANTOINE REDD,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until March 6, 2024, to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

January 30 2024

01/30/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0584
#### In the Matter of Michael O., Respondent, v Peggy M., Appellant.

[972 NYS2d 891]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Diane Kiesel, J.), entered on or about September 16, 2011, which granted the father’s petition to modify a prior order, dated March 10, 2005, and awarded him permanent custody of the child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record amply supports the court’s determination of a substantial change in circumstances based on the testimony *500that the mother repeatedly engaged in a campaign to undermine the child’s relationship with the father, her lack of suitable housing, and, according to the court-appointed psychiatrist, her inability to act in the child’s best interests by refraining from disparaging the father and his family *(see Matter of Mildred S.G. v Mark G.,*62 AD3d 460, 461 [1st Dept 2009]; *see also Matter of Louise E.S. v W. Stephen S.,*64 NY2d 946, 947 [1985]). This testimony also supported the court’s finding that the change in custody was in the best interests of the child. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Freedman and Gische, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cytomedix, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Andrew S. Maslan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for said period.




Date:  March 30, 2011





/s/Andrew S. MaslanAndrew S. MaslanChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Cytomedix, Inc. and will be retained by Cytomedix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00510

- CV

Ashley Danielle Bourgeois , Appellant

v. Bryan Joseph Bourgeois , Appellee

FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- FM

- 19

- 002626 , THE HONORABLE KARIN CRUMP , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on November 9,
2021

. On February 2, 2022 , we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to her
fa il u re to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status report regarding this appeal by February 14, 2022 . Further, th e notice advised appellant that her failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice, and the clerk’s re c ord has not been filed.
If a trial

- court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prose cu t ion unless the appellant was entitled to proceed2 without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established
that she is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145 . Because appellant has fa i led to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

____________ ______________________________ Gisela D. Triana , Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker , and Tr i a n a Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: March 11, 2022
EX-10.21



 Exhibit 10.21 
  





 
 2 December 2014 

Rolf Stahel 
 Neatham 

Sleepers Hill 
 Winchester 

S022 4NB 
  

	RE:	New Amended Terms of Appointment 

 Dear Rolf, 

We hereby confirm that, with your agreement, the Terms of Appointment set out in the agreement between yourself and Midatech Limited dated 15 April 2014
(“Terms”) be and hereby transferred to Midatech Pharma PLC with immediate effect and with the following amendments: 
 The provisions of clause 3
(Restricted Shares) of the Terms be amended as follows regarding the provisions of the vesting criteria namely: 
  

	•	 	the reference in the Terms regarding the market capitalisation for the second and third tranches in relation to the Restricted Shares in Clause 3 shall be amended so that the words “on an Initial Public
Offering” are to be removed and replaced with the words “a target measured by the average market capitalisation on any public market over a 30 day period”, and that the trade sale and/or valuation measures, whilst subject to such
value hurdle, shall not require a 30 day period average. 

  

	•	 	the market capitalisation calculations shall be amended to refer to in the second tranche “subject to an increase in share price to at least 333 pence and with a market capitalisation of at least
£184.7m” and the third tranche amended to “subject to an increase in share price to at least 333 pence and with a market capitalisation of at least £240.9m”. 


In all other respects, save for the “Company” as defined in the Terms to be deemed to be a reference to Midatech Pharma PLC, the Terms shall
continue to have effect. 
  

	
	Yours sincerely,
	
	 /s/ Dr. James Phillips

	
	Director
	
	Midatech Parma PLC








 I agree to the terms set out above 
  

	
	 /s/ Rolf Stahel

	Rolf Stahel
	
	Dated December 2014
	
	The transfer of the Terms to Midatech Pharma PLC is agreed
	
	 /s/ Rolf Stahel

	Director - Midatech Limited
	
	Dated December 2014


  
 Page 2
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2143 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, 

Small Business Administration, Loan Modernization and Accounting System for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, Small Business Administration, Loan 

Modernization and Accounting System for fiscal year 

2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2143 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES, SMALL BUSINESS 

3 ADMINISTRATION, LOAN MODERNIZATION 

4 AND ACCOUNTING SYSTEM FOR FISCAL YEAR 

5 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Independent Agencies, Small Business Adminis9 tration, Loan Modernization and Accounting System for 

10 fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $6,100,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF PACER INTERNATIONAL, INC.



|                                                               |  |                              
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                                                               |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Intermodal Container Service, Inc. d/b/a Harbor Rail Transport |  | California                   
|Manufacturers Consolidation Service of Canada, Inc.            |  | Delaware                     
|Pacer Cartage, Inc.                                            |  | Delaware                     
|Pacific Motor Transport Company d/b/a Pacer Transport          |  | California                   
|Pacer Distribution Services, Inc.                              |  | Delaware                     
|PDS Trucking, Inc.                                             |  | Delaware                     
|RF International, Ltd.                                         |  | New York                     
|Ocean World Lines, Inc.                                        |  | Delaware                     
|Pacer Global Logistics, Inc.                                   |  | Ohio                         
|Pacer Stacktrain S. de R.L. de C.V.                            |  | Mexico                       
|S&H Transport, Inc.                                            |  | Delaware                     
|S&H Leasing, Inc.                                              |  | Delaware
Exhibit 32.2

BULOVA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John D. Stanton, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John D. StantonJohn D. StantonPrincipal Financial Officer
June 1, 2010
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

RECO Rishad Engineering Construction ORG ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W91B4M-07-C-7228 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60447 

Mr. Burhan Jan 

CEO & President 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

MAJ Julie A. Glascott, JA 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF ADMINISTRATIVE DISMISSAL 

By letters dated 30 March 2016 and 22 April 2016 the parties confirmed that 

ASBCA No. 60447 duplicates the earlier docketed appeal ASBCA No. 60444. 

Appellant apparently submitted two notices of appeal from the same contracting 

officer's final decision. The Recorder's office docketed both filings. The latter 

appeal, ASBCA No. 60447, is administratively dismissed from the Board's docket. 

Dated: 3 May 2016 

JEF~}J~L· Recorder 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Administrative 

Dismissal of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60447, 

Appeal of RECO Rishad Engineering Construction ORG, rendered in conformance 

with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tim William, Appellant.

[872 NYS2d 687]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J.), rendered on or about August 21, 2006, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Buckley, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.
## 

EXHIBIT 10.19

PARTIAL LEASE TERMINATION AGREEMENT II

This Partial Lease Termination Agreement II is made and entered into as of March 1, 2000, by and between Limar Realty Corp #26, a California corporation
("Landlord") and Preview Systems, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, successor in interest to Preview Software, Inc., a California corporation
("Tenant").

R E C I T A L S

This Partial Lease Termination Agreement II (the "Partial Termination Agreement II") is made with reference to
and in reliance upon the following facts:



Therefore,
for valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:







IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.

|TENANT:                                       |  | LANDLORD:                                      
|--------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Preview Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation |  | Limar Realty Corp #26, a California corporation
|By:                                           |  |                                                
|                                              |  |                                                
|Name:                                         |  |                                                
|                                              |  |                                                
|Title:                                        |  |                                                
|                                              |  |                                                
|By:                                           |  |                                                
|                                              |  |                                                
|Name:                                         |  |                                                
|                                              |  |                                                
|Title:                                        |  |                                                
|                                              |  |                                                



## QuickLinks
CONSENT  OF  CERTIFIED  PUBLIC  ACCOUNTANTS


TO:     Collaborative  Financial  Network  Group,  Inc.
      (formerly  eFinancial  Depot.com,  Inc.)

As  independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the inclusion
of our report dated June 28, 2001 appearing  in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
of  Collaborative  Financial Network Group, Inc. (formerly eFinancial Depot.com,
Inc.)  for  the  period  ended  March  31,  2001.



/s/  STEFANOU  &  COMPANY,  LLP
----------------------------------
Stefanou  &  Company,  LLP
Certified  Public  Accountants


McLean,  Virginia
August  1,  2001
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78908-78909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30669]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ASTM International Standards

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 9, 2014, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the American Society of 
ASTM International (``ASTM'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ASTM has 
provided an updated list of current, ongoing ASTM standards activities 
originating between September 2014 and December 2014 designated as Work 
Items. A complete listing of ASTM Work Items along with a brief 
description of each, is available at http://www.astm.org.

[[Page 78909]]

    On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of 
the Act on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65226).
    The last notification with the Attorney General was filed on 
September 11, 2014. A notice was filed in the Federal Register on 
October 9, 2014 (79 FR 61098).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-30669 Filed 12-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

STEVE CLIFF, AIS # 142970, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 14-0140-WS-N

KIM THOMAS, et al., :

Defendants. :

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be and is hereby 

DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

DONE and ORDERED this 29th day of January, 2015.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00140-WS-N Document 13 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 1
nrom_ex1011.htm


 


 




  





1











  






 


 




  





2











  






 


 




  





3











  






 


 




  





4











  






 


 




  





5











  






 


 




  





6











  






 


 




  





7











  






 


 




  





8











  






 


 




  





9











  






 


 




  





10











  






 


 




  





11











  






 


 




  





12











  






 


 




  





13











  






 


 




  





14











  






 


 




  





15











  






 


 




  





16











  






 


 




  





17











  






 


 




  





18











  






 


 




  





19











  






 


 




  





20











  






 


 


 21
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION

COREY EUGENE BENTON, : 

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 14-00544-WS-B 

STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., :

Defendants. :

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice.

 DONE this 24th day of April, 2015.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00544-WS-B Document 6 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 1