alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
mondialexh101.htm


Exhibit 10.01










 


MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION TO AMENDED PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT


AMENDED MAY 31, 2015


(Turnkey Drilling, Re Entry, and Multiple Wells)












This Modification and Extension to Amended Participation Agreement dated May 31, 2015 amending the March 26, 2014 Modification and Extension to Amended Participation Agreement is in accordance with Exhibit “B” of an *Asset Purchase Agreement made and entered into as of January 21, 2014, the Effective Date (“Effective Date”), by and among Shale Corp., a corporation organized under the laws of the Province of Ontario in Canada with its principal place of business located at 365 Bay St, Suite 400, Toronto On, M5H 2V1(the “Company”), and the Investor acting as Mondial Ventures, Inc., along with approvals from Success Oil Co., Inc., its Operator and Partner, EGPI Firecreek, Inc. via its wholly owned subsidiary Energy Producers, Inc., Partner, and TWL Investments, aLLC, investing participants, herewith amend, modify and extend the following provision to the January 21, 2014 Amended Participation Agreement (please see *Asset Purchase Agreement included as Exhibit A in the Exhibit 10.1 to a Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Mondial Ventures, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2014):







Section II. paragraph one shall be modified and extended to read:


  







II.


Consideration


  


Participants shall deliver to Operator Participant’s share of the Turnkey Cost to Casing Point for drilling of the first Prospect Well, and the first Program initiated from successful financing will be for the Ellenburger Prospect Well formation at approximately 8,300 foot depth, as provided for in this Agreement and listed as follows in this section II. 1) below within a reasonable time after the execution and effective date of this Agreement not to exceed the period ending June 30, 2015, unless mutually extended by all parties to this Agreement in writing to be attached hereto. In addition, if the Turnkey Costs are delivered for the first Prospect Well listed in II. 1) below, the parties agree to extend timing for agreed participation up to two years but no less than one year. A draft for formal terms will be then delivered by participant 1 in coordination with Success for acceptance by the parties.


  


Agreed this 31st day of May, 2015 by the undersigned:


 


 


  


  



	
Mondial Ventures, Inc.

	
Success Oil Co., Inc.

	
TWL Investments, a LLC


	 	 	 
	
  


/s/Dennis R Alexander

	
  


/s/Jeru M. Morgan

	
  


/s/Larry W. Trapp


	
President and CEO

	
President and CEO

	
Managing Director


	 	 	 
	
Energy Producers, Inc., a wholly owned Subsidiary of EGPI Firecreek, Inc.

	 
	 	 	 
	
/s/Dennis R Alexander

	 	 
	
Dennis R. Alexander

	 	 
	
President and CEO
11692.

#### Ehrlich *v.*Jones.

Decided December 17, 1920.

Levy and claim; from city court of Swainsboro — Judge Kirkland. June 28, 1920.

*T. N. Brown,*for plaintiff in error.

*Alfred Herrington Jr.,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

1. The court did not err in admitting in evidence, over the objections of the claimant, the forthcoming bond given by the latter, or the entry of levy upon the distress warrant. This documentary evidence, while defective in some particulars, was sufficient to show the fact of levy, and was admissible for that purpose. Moreover, the claimant, having executed the forthcoming bond and thereby obtained possession of the property levied upon, was estopped from denying the fact of levy, or from asserting that for any reason the bond was invalid. *Smith*v. *Davis, 3 Ga. App.*419 (60 S. E. 199) ; *Smith*v. *Camp,*84 *Ga.*117 (10 S. E. 539) ; *Garner*v. *Clark,*115 *Ga.*666 (42 S. E. 56) ; *Peeples*v. *Garrison,*141 *Ga.*411 (81 S. E. 116, 51 L. R. A. (N. S.) 635) ; *Hartshorn*v. *Bank of Gough,*15 *Ga. App.*167 (82 S. E. 805).

2. In this case a distress warrant was levied upon two bales of cotton in the possession of the claimant, which the landlord claimed was the property of his tenant, the defendant in fi. fa. Under the facts of the case, it is immaterial whether the landlord was seeking to enforce a special, or only a general, lien on the property, since in either case the burden was upon him to affirmatively make out his case by showing that the cotton levied upon was the identical cotton purchased by the claimant from the defendant in fi. fa. *(Saulsburg*v. *McKellar,*55 *Ga.*323) ; and he failed to carry this burden, as the evidence adduced, together with all legal deductions and inferences arising therefrom, failed to show this essential fact; and therefore the verdict finding the property subject was contrary to law and the evidence, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., eonour.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5


<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                  53,000
<SECURITIES>                            560,000
<RECEIVABLES>                           922,000
<ALLOWANCES>                            98,000
<INVENTORY>                             146,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,736,000
<PP&E>                                  134,000
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          10,080,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   7,648,000
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                18,000
<OTHER-SE>                              (1,114,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            10,080,000
<SALES>                                 2,912,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        2,912,000
<CGS>                                   2,686,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           1,016,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        1,890,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      180,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (2,860,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (2,860,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            (2,860,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.18)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 of ABB Ltd (the "Company") as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on the date hereof (the "Report") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, I, Peter Voser, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that:

(1)    the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)    the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|By:    |  | /s/PETER VOSER          |  | 
|------ |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Name:  |  | Peter Voser             |  | 
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|Date:  |  | September 24, 2004      |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ABB Ltd and will be retained by ABB Ltd and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Provident Financial Group, Inc.'s 10-Q for September 30, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         202,240
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                36,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                98,761
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,608,520
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      5,679,522
<ALLOWANCE>                                     76,445
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,280,817
<DEPOSITS>                                   5,102,400
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,172,458
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            390,466
<LONG-TERM>                                    890,365
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,000
<COMMON>                                        12,773
<OTHER-SE>                                     705,355
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               8,280,817
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                388,798
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               72,551
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 5,088
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               466,437
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             165,839
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             258,257
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          208,180
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   19,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               9,777
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                206,490
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                145,454
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      94,900
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    94,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.11
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.89
<LOANS-NON>                                     35,460
<LOANS-PAST>                                    13,443
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 8,950
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 28,270
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                71,980
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   23,133
<RECOVERIES>                                     8,098
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               76,445
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            76,445
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE PUBLIC COMPANY
ACCOUNTING REFORM AND INVESTOR PROTECTION ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C.  1350, AS ADOPTED)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted, the
"Sarbanes-Oxley Act"), Frank W. Backes, the Chief Financial Officer
of the Company hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.
The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as
Exhibit 32.01 (the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at
the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of
operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic
Report.

Dated: November 13, 2004

/s/ Frank W. Backes

Frank W. Backes
Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

VINCENT WHITE, )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-502-KD-M

)

JOHN MCLAIN, JOHNNY THORNTON, )

SR., JOHN CASSIDY, GREG O’SHEA, )

ALLEN O’SHEA, JEFFERY SULLIVAN, )

and CLINTON LAW )

Defendants. )

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Court’s Order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED,

ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

1. JUDGMENT is entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants John McLain, 

Johnny Thornton, Sr., John Cassidy, Greg O’Shea, Allen O’Shea, Jeffery Sullivan, 

and Clinton Law on Count One of the Complaint. 

2. Count Two of the Complaint is DISMISSED.

1

3. JUDGMENT is entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants John McLain, 

Johnny Thornton, Sr., John Cassidy, Greg O’Shea, Allen O’Shea, Jeffery Sullivan, 

and Clinton Law on Count Three of the Complaint.

4. Plaintiff’s state law claims against all Defendants (Counts Four and Five) are 

DISMISSED without prejudice.

2

DONE and ORDERED this 28th day of April 2016.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 1 Count Two was dismissed via the Court’s Order on Summary Judgment. (Doc. 40). Plaintiff’s response brief stated, 

“The claims under Count II for False Arrest/False Imprisonment are subsumed in Plaintiff’s other claims and Count II is 

therefore due to be dismissed.” (Doc. 35 at 31).

2 The Court dismissed these counts via a previous Order (Doc. 55) pursuant to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 

Plaintiff’s state law claims of assault and outrage. (Doc. 42). Plaintiff responded to the motion as follows: “The Plaintiff 

does not oppose the Defendants’ motion to dismiss the State law claims (Fourth and Fifth Counts) of Thornton, McLain, 

Sullivan, Cassidy, Allen O’Shea, Law, and Greg O’Shea [Doc. 4[2]].” (Doc. 53).

Case 1:14-cv-00502-KD-M Document 61 Filed 04/28/16 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
32.2


Certification
Pursuant To


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant To


Section
906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002






In
connection with the Yearly Report of China Yida Holding, Co. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, George
Wung, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results
of operations of the Company.






/s/ 
George Wung
 George
Wung


Chief
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer






Dated:
March 31, 2009
<PAGE>



                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-113272) pertaining to the Symbion Stock Incentive Plan, Symbion
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, Symbion Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
Ambulatory Resource Centres, Inc. Nonqualified Initial Option Plan, and the
Amended and Restated Ambulatory Resource Centres, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan of
our report dated February 25, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Symbion, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2003.



Nashville, Tennessee                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
March 25, 2004
Exhibit 13.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER OF ABB LTD, PURSUANT TO SECTION 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 of ABB Ltd (the Company) as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on
the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Michel
Demaré, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that:  (1)the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:
  /s/ Michel DemaréName:  Michel DemaréTitle:   Chief Financial Officer   Date: March 10,
2009
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

December 30, 2014

Hon. William D. Mount Jr.

Dale & Klein, L.L.P.

1100 E. Jasmine Ave., Ste. 202

McAllen, TX 78501

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Ricardo Pumarejo Jr.

Kittleman Thomas, PLLC

4900-B N. 10th Street

McAllen, TX 78504

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-14-00205-CV

Tr.Ct.No. C-2480-11-I-B

Style: Cornelio Morales v. Hidalgo County Irrigation District #6

Dear Sir/Madam:

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file reply brief was this day GRANTED 

by this Court. The time has been extended to Monday, January 12, 2015.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch
Exhibit 32.01

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE PUBLIC COMPANY
          ACCOUNTING REFORM AND INVESTOR PROTECTION ACT OF 2002
                (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted, the
"Sarbanes-Oxley Act"), Jerome K. Thorson, the Chief Executive Officer
of 3Si Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that, to the
best of his knowledge:

1.
The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit
32.01 (the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

2.
The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at
the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of
operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic
Report.

Dated: May 14, 2004

/s/ Jerome K. Thorson

Jerome K. Thorson
Chief Executive Officer

Note: This certification accompanies the Periodic Report pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and shall not be deemed "filed" by
the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kimaunie Dolanea WYNTER, a/k/a Kevin L. Moriah, a/k/a Mike, a/k/a Bill, a/k/a Jamaican Bill, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-4578.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 24, 2001.

Decided May 23, 2001.

Margaret McLeod Cain, Charlottesville, VA, for appellant. Robert P. Crouch, Jr., United States Attorney, Jean B. Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, VA, for appellee.

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Kimaunie Dolanea Wynter appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 36. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. “Rule 36 authorizes a court to correct only clerical errors in the transcription of judgments.” *United States v. Werber,*51 F.3d 342, 343 (2d Cir.1995). Because the district court correctly determined that there was no such clerical error in the transcription of the judgment in this case, the court properly denied Wynter’s motion. Finding no error, we affirm the ruling of the district court. *See id.*at 347. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

We express no opinion as to whether or not the sentence complained of might be corrected in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 or habeas corpus proceeding.

*AFFIRMED.*
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1952 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Labor, 

Office of Inspector General for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General for fiscal 

year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OFFICE OF INSPEC5 TOR GENERAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:50 Apr 14, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1952.IH H1952

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1952 IH

1 able for Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General 

2 for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $87,487,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 10, 2015

a0603 

# Order

Clerk June 10, 2015

150088 & (17)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MI CHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150088

COA: 322379

Wayne CC: 00

- 008061

- FC

WILLIAM CLEMENS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to add issue is GRANTED. The application for

leave to appeal the August 11, 2014 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is

DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR

6.502(G).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2172 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. Department 

of Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. 

Department of Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, BUREAU OF 

5 OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT FOR FISCAL 

6 YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Ocean 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2172 IH

1 Energy Management for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $0. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB