alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                EXHIBIT 99.3

Pro forma net  income  and  earnings  per share as if  Financial  Accounting
Standard No. 142,  "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" had been in effect
for the three years ending December 31, 2001.

                                                      Year Ended December 31,
                                               -------------------------------------
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)             2001         2000          1999
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income:
 As Reported                                   $   23,329   $   73,614   $   150,949
 Add Back: After-Tax Goodwill Amortization          2,915        2,516         1,541
                                               ----------   ----------   -----------
 Pro-Forma Net Income                          $   26,244   $   76,130   $   152,490
                                               ==========   ==========   ===========
Basic Earnings Per Common Share:
 As Reported                                   $     0.46   $     1.49   $      3.18
 Add Back: After-Tax Goodwill Amortization           0.06         0.05          0.03
                                               ----------   ----------   -----------
 Pro-Forma Basic Earnings Per Common Share     $     0.52   $     1.54   $      3.21
                                               ==========   ==========   ===========
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share:
 As Reported                                   $     0.46   $     1.46   $      3.08
 Add Back: After-Tax Goodwill Amortization           0.06         0.05          0.03
                                               ----------   ----------   -----------
 Pro-Forma Diluted Earnings Per Common Share   $     0.52   $     1.51   $      3.11
                                               ==========   ==========   ===========
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's audited financial statements for the year ended September 30, 1995
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           417
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 417
<PP&E>                                         7,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,313
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             25
<BONDS>                                        1,518
<COMMON>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,078
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 240
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   83
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               83
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                      83
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   3.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   3.80
        

</TABLE>
**	AMENDMENT TO THE TELLABS, INC.
1994 STOCK OPTION PLAN

 

	**WHEREAS,** Tellabs, Inc. (the "Corporation") has heretofore established the Tellabs, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") for the benefit of participating officers and other key employees of the Corporation and itssubsidiaries;

	**WHEREAS,**the Corporation deems it desirable to make certain amendments to the Plan relating to the vesting of options and/or the post-employment exercise period in the event of the death, disability, or retirement of an option holder, or achange in control of the Corporation;

	**WHEREAS,** the Compensation Committee of the Corporation has considered the recommendations and recommended that the Board of Directors of the Corporation approve this Amendment to the Plan; and

	**WHEREAS,** the Board of Directors of the Corporation has approved this Amendment to the Plan.

	**NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,** that the Plan is hereby amended, effective June 30, 2000, as follows :
- Under Article 2 of the Plan, the following definition of "Change in Control" shall be added:**
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 248 (Monday, December 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 78132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30348]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of American Heritage International Inc.; Order of 
Suspension of Trading

December 16, 2014.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
American Heritage International Inc. (``American Heritage'') because of 
concerns regarding potentially manipulative activity related to 
American Heritage common stock. American Heritage is a Nevada 
corporation with its principal place of business located in Las Vegas, 
Nevada. Its stock is quoted on OTC Link (previously ``Pink Sheets'') 
operated by OTC Markets Group Inc., and on OTC Bulletin Board under the 
ticker symbol: AHII.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the 
above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST, on 
December 16, 2014 through 11:59 p.m. EST, on December 30, 2014.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30348 Filed 12-23-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ricardo BRIONES, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-16299.

D.C. Nos. CV-99-02095-RCB02, CR-96-00464-RCB-02.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 23, 2006.

Patrick Joseph Schneider, USPX — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff — Appellee.

*700Ricardo Briones, Federal Correctional Institution (Phoenix), Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant — Appellant.

Before CANBY, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed on March 17, 2006, is vacated, and this case is withdrawn from submission to this panel.

Counsel will be appointed in a separate order.

Because we have vacated the memorandum disposition filed on March 17, 2006, and withdrawn this case from submission to this panel, appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are denied as moot.

Because the mandate has not yet issued in this case, appellant’s motion to recall the mandate is also denied as moot.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      condition with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polydex Pharmaceuticals
      Limited (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      John A. Luce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By   /s/
              John A. LuceJohn
                A. Luce,
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              September
                14, 2006


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SD Q2 6.30.15 Ex 10.2.1 Incentive Plan Amend


Exhibit 10.2.1


AMENDMENT 2 TO THE 
SANDRIDGE ENERGY, INC. 
2009 INCENTIVE PLAN 
(Effective June 4, 2015)


Effective June 4, 2015, Section 5.1(a) of the Plan shall provide in its entirety as follows:
		
	(a)
	Subject to adjustment under ARTICLE 7, Awards may be made under the Plan for up to 36,250,000 Shares, of which 36,250,000 shares can be issued as Incentive Stock Options.
#### In the Matter of William Ball, Appellant, v Raymond Kelly, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, and as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund, Article II, et al., Respondents.

[826 NYS2d 66]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), entered September 19, 2005, denying the petition and dismissing this CPLR article 78 proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

It cannot be determined, as matter of law, that the disability was a natural and proximate result of a service-related accident *(see Matter of Canfora v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y., Art. II,*60 NY2d 347 [1983]). While petitioner’s hearing loss did result from an acute injury, the record supports the finding that he was performing routine duties at the time of his injury *(see e.g. Matter of McDonald v Regan,*174 AD2d 940 [1991], *lv denied*78 NY2d 859 [1991]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Friedman and McGuire, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TeraForce Technology Corporation (the
"COMPANY") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),
I, Herman M. Frietsch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ HERMAN M. FRIETSCH
-----------------------
Herman M. Frietsch
Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 15, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TeraForce Technology Corporation and will be retained by TeraForce
Technology Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF KENNY H. LEE CPA GROUP, INC.**

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

Axesstel, Inc. 

San Diego, California

 

We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting apart of this Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 333-115168, of our report dated February 28, 2003, except for the restatement as described in Note 2 which is as of September 30, 2004, relating to the consolidated financialstatements of Axesstel, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2002, which is incorporated by reference in that Prospectus. 

 

We also consent to the reference to us under the caption “Experts” in the Prospectus. 

 

/s/    Kenny H. Lee 

KENNY H. LEE CPA GROUP, INC. 

 

Los Angeles, California 

October 12, 2004
#### Bank of America, National Association, Appellant, v Frank Douglas, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[973 NYS2d 42]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Wooten, J.), entered November 5, 2012, which denied plaintiffs motion to voluntarily discontinue the action without prejudice and cancel a lis pendens, and granted defendant Frank Douglas’s cross motion to compel disclosure, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, the motion granted and the cross motion denied.

The court erred in declining to permit plaintiff to voluntarily discontinue the action. CPLR 3217 (b) authorizes a court to grant a motion for voluntary discontinuance “upon terms and conditions, as the court deems proper.” While the determination upon such an application is generally within the sound discretion of the court *(see Tucker v Tucker,*55 NY2d 378, 383 [1982]), a party ordinarily cannot be compelled to litigate and, absent special circumstances, such as prejudice to adverse parties, a discontinuance should be granted *(see Burnham Serv. Corp. v National Council on Compensation Ins.,*288 AD2d 31 [1st Dept 2001]). No special circumstances have been shown here, especially since the action is still in the early stages of litigation. Nor was there any showing that plaintiff sought the discontinuance only to avoid an adverse determination in this action *(see Gonzalez v Kaye,*58 AD3d 578 [1st Dept 2009]). Since we are granting plaintiff’s motion, the cross motion to compel discovery must be denied. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, DeGrasse, Freedman and Feinman, JJ.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 231 

To prohibit Federal funds from being provided to an institution of higher 

education unless the institution has banned use of TikTok on electronic 

devices, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2023 

Mr. BABIN (for himself, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. WALTZ, Mr. JACKSON of Texas, and Mr. SANTOS) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funds from being provided to an institution of higher education unless the institution has banned 

use of TikTok on electronic devices, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Terminate TikTok on 

5 Campus Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 231 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDS FOR ANY INSTI2 TUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION NOT BAN3 NING USE OF TIKTOK ON ELECTRONIC DE4 VICES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Following the 90-day period be6 ginning on the date of enactment of this Act, no Federal 

7 funds may be provided to an institution of higher edu8 cation unless the institution of higher education has devel9 oped and implemented standards and guidelines— 

10 (1) prohibiting the use of TikTok on electronic 

11 devices owned or issued by the institution; and 

12 (2) requiring the removal of TikTok from elec13 tronic devices owned or issued by the institution. 

14 (b) RESEARCH EXCEPTION.—The requirements in 

15 subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to research 

16 that— 

17 (1) is conducted by, supervised by, or author18 ized by faculty of an institution of higher education; 

19 and 

20 (2) pertains to national security, law enforce21 ment, telecommunications, or cybersecurity. 

22 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

23 (1) INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION.—The 

24 term ‘‘institution of higher education’’ has the 

25 meaning given that term in section 102 of the High26 er Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002). 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 231 IH

1 (2) ELECTRONIC DEVICE.—The term ‘‘elec2 tronic device’’— 

3 (A) means a device capable of accessing 

4 the internet (either directly or by connecting to 

5 another device or system); and 

6 (B) includes a computer, a tablet, a 

7 streaming device, a smartphone, a smartwatch, 

8 and any other smart device. 

9 (3) TIKTOK.—The term ‘‘TikTok’’— 

10 (A) means the social networking service 

11 TikTok; and 

12 (B) includes any successor application or 

13 service developed or provided by ByteDance 

14 Limited or an entity owned by ByteDance Lim15 ited. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 4.16

GRAPHIC

Mr. Fred
Kindle
Stadthausstr. 12
8400 Winterthur

Dear
Mr. Kindle,

This
is to confirm the terms and conditions of your employment with ABB Ltd, Zurich (the "Company"). You will start your employment with the Company as of September 1, 2004, as the
designated President and Chief Executive Officer of the ABB Group as well as member of the Executive Committee of the ABB Group. The Company will appoint you to President and Chief Executive Officer
and member of the Executive Committee of the ABB Group, effective January 1, 2005 (or earlier).





---







2

---



Please
confirm your understanding and acceptance of the above terms and conditions by signing and returning to us a copy of this Letter-Agreement

Zurich,
February 17, 2004

|ABB Ltd                                                                                      
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/Hans-Ulrich MaerkiHans-Ulrich Maerki
Chairman of the Nomination and
Compensation Committee
|Accepted:                                                                                    
|Date: February 21, 2004                                                                      

3

---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      condition with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polydex Pharmaceuticals
      Limited (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Sharon L. Wardlaw, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.








By: /s/
      Sharon L. Wardlaw





Sharon
      L.
      Wardlaw,


Chief
      Financial Officer


June
      14,
      2006





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 26, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00100

- CR

Edgar Javier GONZALES

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10

- 2321

- CR William Old, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Ms. Patricia Wagner is the reporter responsible for preparing, certifying and timely filing the reporter’s record. Ms. Wagner’s reporter’s record was originally due on June 2, 2014. Ms. Wagner ha s been granted two previous extensions, the latest until August 21, 2014.

Ms. Wagner has filed a third request for an extension of time until September 22, 2014. The request is GRANTED and Ms. Wagner is hereby ORDERED to file the reporter’s record no

lat er than September 22, 2014. No further extensions of time will be granted.

If the record is not electronically filed by September 22, 2014, an order will issue directing Ms. Wagner to appear and show cause why she should not be held in contempt for failing to file the record.

The Clerk of this court shall cause a copy of this order to be served on Ms. Wagner by certified mail, return receipt requested, and by regular United States mail. Because the trial and appellate courts are jointly respons ible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed, the clerk of this court shall also cause a copy of this order to be served upon the Honorable William

Old. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c)._________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of August, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

KENNY SAM PIERCE, :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 11-0214-CG-M

:

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, :

Commissioner of Social Security, :

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this file, and there having been no 

objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to 

Justice Act (“EAJA”) (Doc. 20) is hereby GRANTED and that Plaintiff is awarded an EAJA 

attorney’s fee in the amount of $2,062.50, payable to Plaintiff.

DONE and ORDERED this 4th day of April, 2012.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:11-cv-00214-CG-M Document 24 Filed 04/04/12 Page 1 of 1