alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2356 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for International 

Organizations and Programs for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for International Organizations and Programs for fiscal year 

2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND PRO5 GRAMS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:13 Apr 20, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2356.IH H2356

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2356 IH

1 able for International Organizations and Programs for fis2 cal year 2024 may not exceed $339,000,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
|   | · | The                Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | · | The                information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |

| Date:                August 4, 2005 | /s/ Paul                A.                Farr                                     Paul                A. FarrSenior                Vice President-Financial and ControllerPPL                Electric Utilities Corporation |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2127 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2127

 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
      Agencies, Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall Foundation, 
      Environmental Dispute Resolution Fund for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
   referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in 
  addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
      Agencies, Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall Foundation, 
      Environmental Dispute Resolution Fund for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR INDEPENDENT 
              AGENCIES, MORRIS K. UDALL AND STEWART L. UDALL 
              FOUNDATION, ENVIRONMENTAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION FUND FOR 
              FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Independent Agencies, 
Morris K Udall and Stewart L Udall Foundation, Environmental Dispute 
Resolution Fund for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $3,200,000.
                                 <all>
```
#### New Delhi Television Limited, Appellant, v Nielsen Holdings N.V et al., Defendants, and The Nielsen Company (US), LLC, et al., Respondents.

[975 NYS2d 7]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (O. Peter Sherwood, J.), entered April 16, 2013, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint in its entirety as against the Nielsen Company (US), LLC, AC Nielsen Corporation, and AC Nielsen Company, LLC (Nielsen defendants), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action commenced by plaintiff, a news network headquartered in India, against the Nielsen defendants, operators of a global marketing research firm that measures television ratings data, alleging that their joint venture, TAM Media Research Private Limited (TAM), which they created with defendants WPP PLC and Kantar Group, Ltd, fraudulently misrepresented or corrupted the data, the amended complaint was properly dismissed on the ground of forum non conveniens *(see*CPLR 327 [a]). Although the Nielsen defendants do not refute that they are New York corporations, plaintiff is located in India, the underlying events occurred in India, the evidence and the witnesses are located in India, and TAM, a necessary but unnamed party, is located in India *(see Islamic Republic of Iran v Pahlavi,*62 NY2d 474, 479 [1984], *cert denied*469 US 1108 [1985]; *United States Aviation Underwriters v United States Fire Ins. Co.,*134 AD2d 187, 190 [1st Dept 1987], *affd*73 NY2d 723 [1988]). Additionally, plaintiff has not shown that India is an inadequate alternative forum *(see id.).*

As noted above, TAM is a necessary party that plaintiff failed to name as a defendant. Dismissal is also warranted on this basis *(see*CPLR 1001 [a]). TAM’s conduct is at issue in every cause of action, and the amended complaint, which mentions TAM hundreds of times, alleges that TAM is defendants’ joint venture *(see Henshel v Held,*13 AD2d 771 [1st Dept 1961]).

Finally, the negligence claims were properly dismissed for failure to state a claim because the complaint fails to identify any duty defendants owed to plaintiff *(see*CPLR 3211 [a] [7]; *Evans v 141 Condominium Corp.,*258 AD2d 293, 295 [1st Dept 1999]).

*438We note that defendants have agreed to toll the statute of limitations for the period that this lawsuit was pending. Concur — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Friedman, Freedman and Clark, JJ.
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL
GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Provident Financial
Group, Inc. (Provident) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003
(the Report), I, Christopher J. Carey, Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer) of Provident, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Provident.

/s/ Christopher J.
Carey Christopher J. Carey Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)

November 13, 2003

[A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Provident Financial Group, Inc. and
will be retained by Provident Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. (“CRM”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence Fensterstock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/
Lawrence FensterstockLawrence FensterstockChief Financial Officer


August 7, 2009








This certification is being furnished to the SEC with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section.




19
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7966
DION WYVIS COLEMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CAROLYN TUCKER, LPN; J. CASTANZA; DR. SCOTT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-03-131-2) Submitted: April 22, 2005 Decided: May 2, 2005 Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dion Wyvis Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Donna L. Foster, Rodney Kyle Adams, Anne Catherine Cardea, LECLAIR RYAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Dion Wyvis Coleman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Coleman v. Tucker , No. CA-03-131-2 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 16, 2004 & entered Nov. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
AMENDMENT
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS AMENDMENT
TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT DATED APRIL 1, 2014 is made and entered into as of March 31, 2015, by and between MassRoots, Inc.
(the “Company”), and Hyler Fortier (the “Employee”).


 


R E C I T A L S


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and Employee entered into an Amended Employment Agreement on April 1, 2014.


 


WHEREAS, the Company
has determined the Employee has routinely exceeded key performance metrics in her area of operations.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
be it resolved that Section 5 (a) of the Employment Agreement dated April 1, 2014 be amended effective April 1, 2015 to state:


 


	(a)		Employee shall receive an annual salary of sixty thousand dollars ($60,000) (“Base
Salary”) paid in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices. The Company may make such deductions, withholdings
or payments from sums payable to Employee hereunder which are required by law for taxes and similar charges. The Company will
review Employee’s base salary in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll procedures.



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Employee and the Company have executed this Employment Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


 


	By:	/s/ Isaac Dietrich
	Name:	Isaac Dietrich 
	Title:	Chairman and CEO


 


	By:	/s/ Hyler Fortier
	 	Employee Signature
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6692

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHORYA A. STATON, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-49, CA-99-832-2) Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: December 27, 2001 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Chorya A. Staton, Appellant Pro Se. Arenda L. Wright Allen, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Chorya A. Staton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), which the court properly construed as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. In his motion, Staton sought reconsideration of the court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Staton , Nos. CR-93-49; CA-99-832-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2001); see United States v. Sanders , 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir. 2001) (holding that rule announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530U.S. 466 (2000), is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review), cert. denied , U.S. , 2001 WL 1244813 (U.S. Nov. 13, 2001) (No. 01-6715). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,076
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      871
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 911,132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              815
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   911,132
<SALES>                                            300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   300
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (38,216)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (38,216)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (38,216)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David K. Spohr, Senior Vice President and Director of Fund Administration of Preferred Investment
Solutions Corp., the Managing Owner of World Monitor Trust II  Series F (Registrant), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David K. Spohr                                       
|David K. Spohr                                           
|Senior Vice President and Director of Fund Administration
|(Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)                 
|March 30, 2007
#### In the Matter of Vincent Alfred Marino, Appellant, v Debra Marino, Respondent.

[972 NYS2d 919]

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Ross, J.H.O.), dated October 1, 2012, which, without a hearing, dismissed his petition for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly dismissed the petitioner’s family *888offense petition, without a hearing, for failure to state a cause of action. Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the factual allegations set forth in his petition were insufficient to allege conduct that would constitute the offense of harassment in the second degree (see Family Ct Act §§ 812 [1]; 821 [1] [a]; Penal Law § 240.26 [3]; *Matter of Dowgiallo v Williams,*99 AD3d 708, 709 [2012]; *Matter of Price v Jenkins,*92 AD3d 787 [2012]; *Matter of Davis v Venditto,*45 AD3d 837, 838 [2007]; *Matter of Jones v Roper,*187 AD2d 593 [1992]; *cf. Matter of Little v Renz,*90 AD3d 757 [2011]; *Matter of McFadden v McFadden,*83 AD3d 943 [2011]). Eng, P.J., Balkin, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

HENRY JOINER, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 05-0501-CG-B

CITY OF GREENSBORO, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is

ORDERED that plaintiff’s complaint be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for

failure to prosecute.

DONE and ORDERED this 29th day of November, 2005.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 2:05-cv-00501-CG-B Document 9 Filed 11/29/05 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

Notice is hereby given that, on December 9, 2014, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.* (“the Act”), Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (“PERF”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Qatar Petroleum, Doha, QATAR, has been added as a party to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and PERF intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

On February 10, 1986, PERF filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the **Federal Register** pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on March 14, 1986 (51 FR 8903).

The last notification was filed with the Department on July 8, 2014. A notice was published in the **Federal Register** pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on August 8, 2014 (79 FR 46451).

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2014-30789 Filed 1-2-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P