alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          12,518
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,862
<ALLOWANCES>                                       160
<INVENTORY>                                      8,685
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,646
<PP&E>                                          12,070
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,829
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,885
<BONDS>                                          5,365
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            76
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,626
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,155
<SALES>                                         36,547
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,547
<CGS>                                           21,423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,780
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    557
<INCOME-TAX>                                        45
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                512
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       512
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2001 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2001

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
  Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health Innovation 
                Account, CURES Act for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
  Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health Innovation 
                Account, CURES Act for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 
              AND HUMAN SERVICES, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH 
              INNOVATION ACCOUNT, CURES ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Health and 
Human Services, National Institutes of Health Innovation Account, CURES 
Act for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $496,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.21


Anhui Province Bengbu City Emperor Ming Taizu Cultural


and Ecological Resort and Tourism Project Investment Agreement





Party A: Anhui Province Bengbu City Government


Party B:  Yida (Fujian) Tourism Group Co., Ltd.; and


Anhui Xingguang Investment Group Ltd.





Project:


Emperor Ming Taizu Cultural and Ecological Resort and Tourism Project, including recreational developments of Royal Hot Spring World, Royal Tour Town, Filial Piety Temple and Royal Hunting Garden.





Investment and Area:


Party B will form a limited liability company, with a total registered capital of 100,000,000 RMB to engage in construction and development.





The Ming Dynasty Entertainment World will be built on approximately 5,000 Mu of land.





Land Use Rights:


Refer to State-owned Land Use Rights Agreement.





Jurisdiction:


Law of China





Dispute:


If there is any dispute between the parties, both parties shall resolve the dispute through compromise settlement. If the parties cannot reach the settlement, then either party can resolve the dispute by the courts of Hefei City.





Date of the Agreement:


April 15, 2010
#### Bartlett *v.*A Cargo of Lumber.

*(District Court, E. D. New York.*

March 28, 1890.)

Demurrage — Liability oe Consignee — Time oe Discharge — Custom oe Port.

Where it was proved to be a custom of the port of New York for vessels to be discharged in the order of their arrival at the wharf of the consignee, *held,*that a vessel which arrived after other vessels, and was discharged in her turn, could not recover demurrage for the time lost in awaiting her turn.

In Admiralty.

Action by the master of the brig George E. Dale against a cargo lately on board that vessel, to recover demurrage. The bill of lading under which the lumber was transported contained no provision as to time of discharge, or for “dispatch.”

*Goodrich, Beady & Goodrich,*for libelant.

*R. B. Benedict,*for claimant.

Benedict, J.

This is an action for demurrage. The detention complained of was delay in unloading the schooner George E. Dale. The cargo was lumber. The consignee’s place of discharge was a pier where there was a space of some 250 feet. When the George E. Dale arrived at this place of discharge, she found the schooner Emerson there before her. The Eltie was then discharging at the pier. After the Eltie was discharged the Emerson was given the berth, and then the Dale was given the berth and discharged. The position of the libelant is that there was room for two vessels to lie at the pier and be discharged at the same time, and that it was the duty of the consignee, therefore, to discharge two vessels at the same time, instead of keeping the Dale waiting until the Emerson was discharged. The proof is not very satisfactory to show that two vessels could be properly discharged at the same time at this place, but, however that may be, the proof is that by the custom of the port in regard to the discharging of lumber the consignee is not required tó be prepared to discharge and take care of two cargoes of lumber at the same time. The custom shown by the proofs is that where several vessels come to the same consignee, the consignee discharges them in turn; that is, one after the other, in the order of their arrival. This custom the consignee followed in this case when he discharged the Dale in her turn next after the Emerson.. Under the custom proved it was. no failure of his duty to decline to undertake the discharge of the Dale before the discharging of the Emerson was concluded, even if the fact was that there was room at the pier for both vessels to be discharged at the same time. The libel must be dismissed, with costs.

1

 Reported by Edward G. Benedict, Esq., of the New York bar.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1871 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of 

Representatives, Office of the Minority Leader for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House 

of Representatives, Office of the Minority Leader for 

fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, OFFICE OF 

5 THE MINORITY LEADER FOR FISCAL YEAR 

6 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:42 Apr 13, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1871.IH H1871

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1871 IH

1 able for House of Representatives, Office of the Minority 

2 Leader for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $7,751,946. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30044]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EF15-3-000]


Western Area Power Administration; Notice of Filing

December 17, 2014.
    Take notice that on December 4, 2014, the Western Area Power 
Administration submitted a tariff filing per 300.10: UGP_PSMBP-ED_WAPA 
166-20141117 to be effective 1/1/2015. (Rate Adjustment for the P-
SMBP--ED--Western Area Power Administration-Rate Order No. WAPA-166).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#82c4c7d0c1cdeceeebece7d1f7f2f2edf0f6c2e4e7f0e1ace5edf4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="54121106171b3a383d3a31072124243b262014323126377a333b22">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 5, 2015.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30044 Filed 12-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Peter N. Ellair, relator v. Wayne Circuit Judge.

*Wills*— Dismissal *of appeal from 'probate*— -fiew *issues*— Oertioran'i.

New issues need not be framed in the circuit court in will cases.

Dismissal of an appeal from the probate of a will is a final judgment which remands the proceedings to the probate court, and which cannot be set aside if not complained of within the two years allow-ed for removing proceedings to the Supreme Court on error or *certiorari.*

Costs may be granted against a circuit judge on allowing a writ of mandamus to compel him to vacate an illegal order.

Mandamus.

Submitted June 29.

Granted July 1.

*Ed. E. Kane*for relator.

An order dismissing an appeal from tbe probate of a will is a final judgment in the case: Bouv. Law Dict. tit. “Judgment;” 3 Bl. Com. 395 ; Freeman on Judgments (2d. ed.) §§ 2, 16; *Insurance Co. v. Swift*12 Minn. 444; *Belt v. Davis*1 Cal. 138; and if irregular a motion to correct it must be prompt: *Creveling v. Moore*39 Mich. 565; *Montgomery v. Merrill*36 Mich. 104; *Rogers v. Rogers*1 Paige 188; *Verplank v. Hall*21 Mich. 471; *O'Flynn v. Eagle*7 Mich. 308; *Smith v. Mitchell*9 Mich. 261; *People v. Calhoun Circuit Judge*1 Doug. (Mich.) 419; *Nichols v. Nichols*10 Wend. 560.

*George H. Prentis*for respondent.

Campbell, J.

Delator seeks a *mandamus*to vacate an order of respondent restoring an appeal which had been previously dismissed.

The appeal was dismissed December 13,1876, for a failure . by the appellant from the probate of a will to file a declaration on appeal. The order to restore it was made, on a motion entered April 12, 1880.

It has been frequently held that no new issues need be framed in the circuit court in will cases. But nevertheless the dismissal was a final judgment which remanded the pro*497ceedings to the probate court, and which could not be set aside unless complained of within the proper time. Ve need not inquire whether the circuit court would have the right to act at any time within two years. It certainly could not interfere after the time had expired for removing the order complained of to this- court. No writ of error or *certiorari*would lie from this court after two years unless in cases specially saved by statute for disability, and no suck case is presented here.

In the present case more than three years had elapsedi before any attempt was made to restore the cause which had been dismissed. This was too late, and the action was illegal.

A *mcmdamus*must issue as prayed, with costs.

The other Justices concurred.
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATIONS OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    That information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ JEFFREY W. LUNSFORDJeffrey W. LunsfordPresident, Chief Executive Officerand Chairman of the Board
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    That information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ CLAIRE LONGClaire LongChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.02




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with the Annual Report of SWK Holdings Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Burgon, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.02, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Dated: March 29, 2011

/s/ Paul V. BurgonPaul V. Burgon

Interim Chief Financial Officer and Secretary




A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Provident Financial Group, Inc.'s 10-Q for March 31, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         215,073
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,611,115
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      5,265,159
<ALLOWANCE>                                     72,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,699,995
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,953,304
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,097,772
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            299,060
<LONG-TERM>                                    677,498
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,000
<COMMON>                                        12,702
<OTHER-SE>                                     652,659
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               7,699,995
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                123,142
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               22,757
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   389
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               146,288
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              54,686
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              80,144
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           66,144
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    5,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               3,692
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 64,631
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,350
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      30,400
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.99
<LOANS-NON>                                     43,414
<LOANS-PAST>                                    17,109
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 9,327
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 33,331
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                71,980
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    7,009
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,866
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               72,837
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            72,837
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANTONIO EASTER, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 10-00128-WS-N

ROSEMARY MARKS, et al, :

Defendants. :

 

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be and is hereby

DISMISSED without prejudice. 

DONE this 11th day of May, 2010.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Case 1:10-cv-00128-WS-N Document 6 Filed 05/11/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

SELECTICA, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amendment to the annual report of Selectica, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jim Thanos, Co-Chair of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 7, 2009



|                 
|-----------------
|/S/    JIM
THANOS
|Jim Thanos       
|Co-Chair
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Seaena, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin T. Ryan, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ KEVIN T. RYAN
----------------------------------------
Kevin T. Ryan
Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerardo CARRILLO-ZATARAIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 99-10624.

D.C. No. CR-99-00039-HDM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2001.*

Decided May 25, 2001.

*537Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner Gerardo Carrillo-Zatarain appeals the forty-six month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of being found in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Carrillo-Zatarain contends the district court erred by failing to grant his requests for downward departures for prejudicial delay, sentencing disparities among the judicial districts, and cultural assimilation. For each request for a downward departure, the district court determined, under Carrillo-Zatarain’s circumstances, such departures were not warranted. The district court’s discretionary decision not to depart downward from the sentencing guidelines is not subject to appellate review. *See United States v. Lipman,*133 F.3d 726, 729 (9th Cir.1998); *see also United States v. Garcia-Garcia,*927 F.2d 489, 491 (9th Cir.1991) (per curiam) (holding district court’s silence regarding its authority to depart does not indicate it believed it lacked the ability to depart).

Carrillo-Zatarain was convicted of violating § 1326(a) and (b)(1). We sua sponte remand to the district court with instructions to enter a corrected judgment that does not refer to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1). *See United States v. Herrera-Blanco,*232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2000) (citing *United States v. Rivera-Sanchez,*222 F.3d 1057, 1061-64 (9th Cir.2000)).

DISMISSED in part; and REMANDED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.