alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                            SUPERIOR GALLERIES, INC.

                        2003 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Superior Galleries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Silvano DiGenova, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                      /S/  PAUL BIBERKRAUT
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Paul Biberkraut, Chief Financial Officer
                                      September 12, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

         This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
are not to be incorporated by reference into the Report or any other filing of
the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 16, 2016

a0316

Order 

Clerk

March 16, 2016

153203 & (10)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153203

COA: 331000

Barry CC: 15-000620-FC

SIGMUND FLOYD RUMPF,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the February 11, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Joshua Passalacqua, as Administrator of the Estate of Brittany Passalacqua, Deceased, Appellant, v State of New *1448York, Respondent.

[963 NYS2d 908]

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Philip J. Patti, J.), entered March 21, 2012. The order granted the motion of defendant to dismiss the claim.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at the Court of Claims.

Present—Centra, J.P, Fahey, Carni, Whalen and Martoche, JJ.
Order entered July 1, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00175-CV

BERNARD PATRUSKY, Appellant

V.

KENNETH BLOOMBERG AND MARILYN BLOOMBERG, Appellee

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-14821

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s June 27, 2014 second unopposed motion for extension of time 

to file brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than August 4, 2014. Appellant is cautioned 

that no further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ZACHERY WILSON,

Plaintiff,

:

:

:

:

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 14-337-CB-M

:

EMILY WHITTLE, et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues 

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that Plaintiff Zachery Wilson’s claims 

for Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement against 

Defendant Whittle, and his claims for supervisory liability 

and due process violations as alleged against Defendants 

Meyers, Howard and Fails be and are hereby DISMISSED 

without prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The remaining of Plaintiff’s claims for 

excessive force and medical care claims shall be allowed to 

proceed with service.

DONE this 13th day of November, 2014.

s/Charles R. Butler, Jr. _____

 Senior United States District Judge

Case 1:14-cv-00337-CB-M Document 8 Filed 11/13/14 Page 1 of 1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2123 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, 

Working Capital Fund for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, Working Capital Fund for fiscal year 

2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES, WORKING CAPITAL 

5 FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:04 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2123.IH H2123

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2123 IH

1 able for Independent Agencies, Working Capital Fund for 

2 fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $4,000,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial informtion extracted from
Dean Witter Diversified Futures Fund II L.P. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       8,211,611
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,295<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,033,176<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,033,176<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               785,376<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               374,528
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                410,848
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            410,848
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   410,848
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $30,295.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized loss on open contracts of $208,730.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $286,386 and accrued
management fee of $20,083.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $1,108,208,
net change in unrealized of $(502,404), and interest income of
$179,572.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for World Monitor Trust II--Series F
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK>               0001090702
<NAME>              World Monitor Trust II--Series F
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1999

<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1999

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          1,000

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,000

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,000

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      1,000

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,000

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    0

<EPS-BASIC>                   0

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
#### F. B. VanMeter *v.*R. P. Pepper.

Liability of Guarantor — Petition.

To make out a cause of action against a guarantor it is necessary in the petition to aver, in addition to the facts by which he became bound for the default of the principal, facts showing such default.

Recovery on Contract.

To recover on an executory contract plaintiff must aver facts in his petition showing that he was ready and willing, on the day stipulated in the contract, to perform his part of it.

*828APPEAL FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT.

September 25, 1875.

*T. N. & D. W. Lindsey, for appellant.*

*G. W. Craddock, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

Pepper’s only liability was that of a guarantor, and in order to make out a cause of action against him, it was necessary, in addition to the facts by which he became bound for the default of Duck-worth, to allege facts showing such default. This was not done. Duckworth would only be liable in the event the appellant was ready and willing at the time and place of performance to deliver the cattle to him according to the terms of their contract, that is, at five cents per pound on a credit of fifteen days. It is not alleged that he was ready and willing on the day stipulated in the contract to perform his part of it. The only allegation on that point is in these words: “Plaintiff says that he kept said cattle until said 15th day of November, 1873, and that they then weighed 65,050 pounds,” etc., and that “Duckworth failed and refused to receive said cattle on said 15th day of November,” etc.

But if the petition had been good, the testimony of the appellant himself shows he had no right to recover. He says he was at home on his farm where the cattle were, on the 15th and 16th of November, and that he went away on the 17th, and left instructions with J. M. VanMeter that if Duckworth came, not to let him have the cattle unless he paid the money for them. He does not say that he was ready and willing to deliver the cattle on the 15th, but says that sometime prior to that date he received a letter from Duck-worth saying he was afraid he would not be able to take the cattle, and would have to look up a purchaser for him to take the cattle. The evidence shows that Duckworth was then known to be seriously embarrassed, and we have no doubt but the failure to allege readiness on appellant’s part to comply with his contract resulted from his unwillingness to make it, and not from inadvertence or mistake.

If the petition and evidence showed a breach of contract on the part of Duckworth, it would then be doubtful whether the appellee is not absolved from liability by appellant’s failure to give him notice of the default of Duckworth, and that he would look to him for indemnity, but we need not now decide that question.

Judgment *affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Crystalix Group International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John S. Woodward, President (Chief Executive Officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ JOHN S. WOODWARD
--------------------------------------
John S. Woodward
President (Chief Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 10.17****EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT**     The undersigned and AdStar, Inc., hereby agree that upon the effective date of the newEmployment Agreement between them to be executed on the date hereof, the annual rate ofcompensation specified therein shall be reduced by five percent (5%) to a rate of $202,160 perannum, such reduction to continue until 10 days after the undersigned provides written notice toAdStar of the revocation of this voluntary salary reduction, or in the absence of notice, until theexpiration of the term of the Agreement.Dated: December 21, 2005        AdStar, Inc.       by:       Eli Rousso   Leslie Bernhard,
Exhibit 10.1

 

SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST

 

Summary of Trustee Compensation

 

The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the Trustees of Senior Housing Properties Trust, or the Company, for services as Trustees, which is subject to modification at any time by the Board of Trustees.

 

·                  Each Independent Trustee receives an annual fee of $40,000, plus a fee of $1,000 for each meeting attended. Up to two $1,000 fees are payable if more than one board and board committee meetings are held on the same date.

 

·                  The chairpersons of the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and governance committee, each of whom is an Independent Trustee, receive an additional annual fee of $12,500, $7,500 and $7,500, respectively.

 

·                  Each Trustee receives a grant of 2,500 of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest on the date of the first board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders (or, for Trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first board meeting attended).

 

·                  The Company generally reimburses all Trustees for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Trustees and for out of pocket costs incurred from their attending certain continuing education programs.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

May 8, 2003 Session

JOHN HANNAH, JR. v. LINDSAY CRUSSELL, ET AL.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County

No. 1-134-02

FILED JUNE 30, 2003

No. E2002-02475-COA-R3-CV 

CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.

The trial court expressed its conclusion that there was “no just reason for delay,” Tenn. R.

Civ. P. 54.02, in entering a final judgment with respect to the plaintiff’s claim against his uninsured

motorist carrier. This prompted the court to certify its judgment as final, thus ostensibly conferring

jurisdiction on the Court of Appeals to review the propriety of the grant of summary judgment in

favor of State Farm. See Tenn. R. App. P. 3(a) and Tenn. R. Civ. P. 54.02. The trial court did not

make specific factual findings to support its conclusory “no just reason for delay” determination.

The Supreme Court in Harris v. Chern, 33 S.W.3d 741 (Tenn. 2000) has clearly stated that such

specific findings are “preferabl[e].” Id. at 745, n.3. I agree with what I perceive to be the majority’s

conclusion that the trial court abused its discretion when it directed the entry of the summary

judgment as final. It seems to me that a grant of summary judgment to an uninsured motorist carrier

based upon a clear showing that the facts do not presently implicate the claimant’s uninsured

motorist coverage should, in almost all cases, remain in a non-final status while the underlying

litigation is still pending. This would permit the trial court to vacate the judgment in the event the

defendant’s liability insurance carrier goes into bankruptcy during the pendency of the case or in the

event, for some other reason, the facts change so as to implicate the uninsured motorist coverage.

This is not to suggest that there would not be other ways to correct what subsequently turns out to

be an improper grant of summary judgment; but obviously it would be easier to accomplish this

objective, at least during the pendency of the underlying proceedings, if the grant were not final.

While I am inclined to agree with the majority’s conclusion that the grant of summary

judgment was appropriate in this case, I must dissent from the majority’s decision to reach this issue.

This is because I have serious reservations as to our jurisdiction to address this matter. It seems to

me that the trial court’s error in directing the entry of a final judgment negates our jurisdiction,

which, of course, is based solely upon that direction.
-2-

I would remand for further proceedings, but decline to address the propriety of the summary

judgment grant in this case. I am uncomfortable in deciding this case on the merits while at the same

time deciding that this litigation is not properly before us.

______________________________ 

CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., JUDGE
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the

case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 4/29/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

DELMA MARTINEZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. LAS VEGAS MEDICAL CENTER; JOHN GAITLING, Forensic Director,

Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-2227 (D.C. New Mexico) (D.C. No. CIV-95-830-SC)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before ANDERSON, BARRETT and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. **See** Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff Delma Martinez appeals the judgment of the district court granting2

summary judgment to defendant John Gaitling on Martinez’s civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In a rambling and incoherent complaint, Martinez asserted thatGaitling, the Forensic Director of the Las Vegas Medical Center, had falsified her pretrial competency evaluations, denied her access to a law library, deprived her of property without due process of law, and unlawfully searched her attache case. The district court dismissed the complaint **sua sponte** under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) as frivolous. This appeal followed. Upon careful consideration of the complaint and the record on appeal, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated in the district court’s Memorandum and Order dated September 26, 1995. The Judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico is herebyAFFIRMED
.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT
Michael R. Murphy Circuit Judge