alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9



<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000

<CASH>                                         4,413,222
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         1,205,662
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               1,120,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    511,612
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        130,657,042
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,720,905
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 149,116,554
<DEPOSITS>                                     132,691,520
<SHORT-TERM>                                   4,350,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1,059,003
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       775,325
<OTHER-SE>                                     10,240,706
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 149,116,554
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                6,338,831
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              18,391
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               52,263
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               6,409,485
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2,708,226
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,855,481
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          3,554,004
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  392,590
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                3,099,840
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,020,628
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,020,628
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   631,628
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .83
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 10.21
<LOANS-NON>                                    236,936
<LOANS-PAST>                                   4,467,689
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,338,691
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  28,155
<RECOVERIES>                                   17,779
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,720,905
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,720,905
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        1,655,492



</TABLE>
#### Israel Bell v. E. Wilber Pate.

[See 47 Mich. 463.]

*Costs*— Stenographer’s *fees for copy of*testimony,

A stenographer's fees for a copy of Ms notes are not taxaMe as costs.. It is Ms duty to file Ms notes without charge, and he can he compelled to do so; and a payment for such copy is unnecessary.

Motion for retaxation of costs.

Submitted April 4..

Denied April 5.

*Moore <& Moore*for the motion.

*Ward & Palmer*against.
#### Antonio Vacchio et al., Appellants, v Craig S. Thaler et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[971 NYS2d 887]

In an action to recover'damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jaeger, J.), dated August 2, 2012, which granted the motion of the defendants Craig S. Thaler and Jeffrey L. Thaler for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff Antonio Vacchio did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion of the defendants Craig S. Thaler and Jeffrey L. Thaler for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them is denied.

The defendants Craig S. Thaler and Jeffrey L. Thaler (hereinafter the movants) failed to meet their prima facie burden of demonstrating that the plaintiff Antonio Vacchio did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345, 350 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The movants’ motion papers failed to adequately address the plaintiffs’ claim, clearly set forth in the bill of particulars, that the plaintiff Antonio Vacchio sustained a medically determined injury or impairment of a nonpermanent nature which prevented him from performing substantially all of the material acts which constituted his usual and customary daily activities for not less than 90 days during the 180 days immediately following the subject accident *(see Che Hong Kim v Kossoff,*90 AD3d 969 [2011]; *cf. Calucci v Baker,*299 AD2d 897, *715898 [2002]). Since the movants failed to meet their prima facie burden, it is unnecessary to determine whether the papers submitted by the plaintiffs in opposition were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see generally Stukas v Streiter,*83 AD3d 18, 24 [2011]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the movants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff Antonio Vacchio did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident. Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur. [Prior Case History: 2012 NY Slip Op 32118(U).]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7644

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROOSEVELT SPANN, JR., a/k/a Russell Rice, Jr., a/k/a Peachy,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Richard D. Bennett, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cr-00179-RDB-1)

Submitted: March 29, 2022 Decided: April 1, 2022

Before HARRIS, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roosevelt Spann, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Roosevelt Spann, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for 

compassionate release and for home confinement. We have reviewed the record on appeal 

and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Spann’s motions. 

See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (providing standard), cert. denied, 

142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. 

Spann, No. 1:06-cr-00179-RDB-1 (D. Md. Nov. 9, 2021). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 18.1



J.L. French Automotive Castings, Inc.
3101 South Taylor Drive Post Office Box 1024
Sheboygan, Wisconsin 53082-1024

March 22, 2002

Gentlemen/Ladies:

Re: Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2001

This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a
letter from a registrant's independent accountants whenever there has been a
change in accounting principle or practice.

During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company changed its method of
applying Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) 87, "Employers'
Accounting for Pensions" so that the fair value of it's pension plans
accumulated benefit obligation and the fair value of the plan assets are
measured as of October 31, within 90 days of year end as permitted under
paragraph 52 of SFAS 87. The Company also changed its method of applying SFAS
106, "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions" so
that the measurement of plan assets and obligations are measured as of October
31, within 90 days of year end as permitted under paragraph 72 of SFAS 106.
Previously, such amounts were measured as of December 31 of each year. According
to the management of the Company, these changes were made to enable the Company
to have the actuary's valuations prepared prior to preparing the year end
financial statements which enables the Company to disclose the valuations based
upon the actuarial assessments rather than estimates of the fair value.

A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining
the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable alternative
principles has not been established by the accounting profession. Thus, we
cannot make an objective determination of whether the changes in accounting
described in the preceding paragraph are to a preferable method. However, we
have reviewed the pertinent factors, including those related to financial
reporting, in these particular cases on a subjective basis, and our opinion
stated below is based on our determination made in this manner.

We are of the opinion that the Company's changes in methods of accounting are to
acceptable alternative methods of accounting, which, based upon the reasons
stated for the changes and our discussions with you, are also preferable under
the circumstances in these particular cases. In arriving at this opinion, we
have relied on the business judgment and business planning of your management.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


                                      -67-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from  the
Statement  of  Financial  Condition at June 30, 2000 and the Statement of Income
for  the  twelve  months ended June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference  to  such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>     1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-15-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          67
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       750
<OTHER-SE>                                    (683)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            84,106
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (84,106)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (84,106)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.010)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.010)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MATERIALISE NV (the Company) on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wilfried Vancraen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:



|(i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 28, 2019



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Wilfried Vancraen  
|    |  | Wilfried Vancraen      
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Alford Isaiah B., Ill, and Another, Children Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Alford B., Jr. Appellant; The Children’s Aid Society, Respondent.

[968 NYS2d 361]

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Monica Drinane, J.), entered on or about April 3, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from, determined, following a fact-finding hearing, that respondent father permanently neglected the subject children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s argument that the Family Court erred in admitting the records of the agency that was initially assigned to the case is not preserved for appellate review, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. A proper foundation was laid for their admission and respondent, who received a copy of the records in advance of the hearing, failed to challenge any specific entry.

The agency demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that it repeatedly tried to contact respondent in writing and by telephone and made referrals in order to assist him in completing the service plan, but he failed to respond, failed to consistently visit the children, and did not complete a drug treatment program or other programs to which he was referred *(see Matter of Sheila G.,*61 NY2d 368, 385 [1984]).

The court was permitted to draw a negative inference from respondent’s failure to testify *(see Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs. v Denise J., 87*NY2d 73, 79 [1995]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Acosta, Saxe and Freedman, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of BTU International, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 28, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the
Report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Peter J. TallianPeter J. TallianChief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)


Dated: August 6, 2009
11950.

#### Lanier *v.*The State.

Decided January 25, 1921.

Accusation of larceny; from city court of Metter — Judge Lanier. October 28, 1920.

*Kirkland & Kirkland,*for plaintiff in error.

*G.*W. *Turner, solicitor,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence upon which, the amendment to the motion for a new trial was based was merely cumulative and impeaching in its character, and therefore did not require a new trial.

2. The other grounds of the motion for a new trial, not having been argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke a/nd Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000317477
<NAME>                          Eldorado Financial Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                        1
<CURRENCY>                                                 US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                              SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                     1
<CASH>                                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    0
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               0
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                        10000
<OTHER-SE>                                                     (10000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        0
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    0
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (477)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              (477)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (477)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                      0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.00



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

###### Sunshine Act Meeting

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the following matter will be deferred from the “Discussion Agenda” at the open meeting of the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation scheduled to be held at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, December 16, 2014, in the Board Room on the fourth floor of the FDIC Building located at 550—17th Street NW., Washington, DC.:

Memorandum and resolution re: Regulatory Capital Rules, Liquidity Coverage Ratio, Proposed Revisions to the Definition of Qualifying Master Netting Agreement and Related Definitions.

Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at (202) 898-7043.

Dated: December 15, 2014.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-29728 Filed 12-16-14; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Angeles Partners X (the"Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), MarthaL. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership,and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-111754) and S-8 (No. 333-91698) ofPacer International, Inc. of our report dated March 13, 2005 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Francisco, California 

March 13, 2005