alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.11



 Exhibit 10.11 

CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. 2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 

NOTICE OF GRANT OF PERFORMANCE AWARD 
  

			
	Holder’s Name:		    FIRST  NAME         LAST  NAME    
		
	Holder’s Address:		    ADDRESS  LINE  1    
			    ADDRESS  LINE  2    
			    ADDRESS  LINE  3    
			    CITY,     STATE         ZIPCODE    
    COUNTRY    

 You (“Holder”) are hereby granted a performance award (this “Performance Award”) of
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units (“PBRSUs”), whereby each PBRSU represents the right to receive shares of Common Stock of Cirrus Logic, Inc. following the applicable vesting date, subject to the terms and conditions of the Cirrus
Logic, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and the related Performance Award Agreement (the “Performance Award Agreement”), as set forth below. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set
forth in the Plan. The term “Performance Award” shall have the same meaning as the term “Performance Award” set forth in the Plan, and this Award, the Performance Award Agreement, and the Plan shall each be interpreted
accordingly. 
  

			
	Grant Number:		    OPTION  NUMBER    
		
	Date of Grant:		    OPTION  DATE    
		
	Target Number of Performance Awards Granted:		    TOTAL  SHARES  GRANTED    
		
	Maximum Number of PBRSUs:		    MAX  SHARES  GRANTED    
		
	Performance Period:		    PERFORMANCE  PERIOD    
		
	Performance Measures:		Relative Total Shareholder Return as defined by the Company’s Compensation Committee on %%COMP  APPROVAL  DATE    
		
	Expiration Date to Accept:		2 business days prior to vest date

 Failure to execute and return the documents applicable to this Award before the Expiration Date to Accept
set forth above will render this Award and the grant of the Performance Award invalid. 







 By your signature or electronic acceptance of this Notice of Grant and the signature of the
Company’s representative below, you and the Company hereby acknowledge your acceptance of this Award of PBRSUs granted on the Date of Grant indicated above, which has been issued under the terms and conditions of the Plan and the Performance
Award Agreement. You further acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan and the Performance Award Agreement and agree to all of the terms and conditions of the Plan and the RSU Agreement, which are incorporated in this Award by reference. 

 

							
	HOLDER:				CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.
				
	  
				By:		  

	Signature						Gregory S. Thomas
				
	  
						
	Printed Name						
				
	  
						
	Date						

 10-2010
**Exhibit
        23.1**
 
 
 **Consent
        of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
 
 We
          have
          issued our report dated May 30, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financial
          statements included in the Annual Report of WQN, Inc. (formerly known as
          WordQuest Networks, Inc.) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
          2005. We
          hereby
          consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the following
          Registration Statements of WQN, Inc:
 
 
 Form Type
              
              Registration NumberS-8
              
              333-107847, effective August 11,
                2003S-8
              
              333-54498, effective January 29,
                2001S-8
              
              333-40350, effective June 28,
                2000S-8
              
              333-40348, effective June 28,
                2000
 
  /s/
        Grant Thornton LLP
 Dallas,
        Texas
 May
        30,
        2006
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

 

In connection withthe annual report of Internet Gold-Golden Lines Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31,2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Doron Turgeman, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.

 

/s/Doron Turgeman*

Doron Turgeman 

Chief Executive Officer

April18, 2016

 

*	The originally executed copy of this Certificationwill be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.

** **

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Companyspecifically incorporates it by reference.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated  financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                              38,084
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       26,845 
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        134,597 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   215,111 
<PP&E>                                             945,638 
<DEPRECIATION>                                     486,202 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,002,167 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              188,215 
<BONDS>                                            599,575 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               100
<OTHER-SE>                                        (341,432)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,002,167 
<SALES>                                          1,761,214 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,761,214 
<CGS>                                            1,269,566 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,269,566 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   587,658 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  85,986 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (181,996)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (181,996)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (181,996)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (18.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
                                               


</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1890 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of Representatives, Salaries and Expenses of the Office of the Parliamentarian for 

fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House 

of Representatives, Salaries and Expenses of the Office 

of the Parliamentarian for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SALARIES 

5 AND EXPENSES OF THE OFFICE OF THE PAR6 LIAMENTARIAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for House of Representatives, Salaries and Expenses 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1890 IH

1 of the Office of the Parliamentarian for fiscal year 2024 

2 may not exceed $2,026,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant To


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant To


Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002








In connection with the Yearly Report Amendment of China Yida Holding, Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Chen Minhua, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results of operations of the Company.








/s/  Chen Minhua


Chen Minhua


Chief Executive Officer





Dated: July 26, 2012
#### In the Matter of Norman Jeckel III, Petitioner, v New York State Department of Corrections, Respondent.

[975 NYS2d 697]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review, among other things, a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

During’ a frisk of petitioner’s cube, a correction officer found three tablets of what was ultimately identified as suboxone. Petitioner was accordingly charged in a misbehavior report with violating various prison disciplinary rules and, following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of possessing unauthorized medication and drug use. Upon administrative review, the drug use charge was dismissed and the penalty reduced ac*1181cordingly. Petitioner commenced this proceeding to challenge both the initial determination and the denial of his subsequent request for reconsideration.

Petitioner here sought to discuss the disciplinary proceedings with retained counsel, but prison officials prohibited personal and telephonic contact between the two prior to the disciplinary hearing. To be sure, inmates do not “have a right to either retained or appointed counsel in disciplinary proceedings” *(Wolff v McDonnell,*418 US 539, 570 [1974]; *see Matter of Laureano v Kuhlmann,*75 NY2d 141, 146 [1990]; *Matter of Fuentes v Fischer,*56 AD3d 919, 920 [2008]). They remain, however, entitled to “a reasonable opportunity to seek and receive the assistance of attorneys” with regard to issues of concern to them *(Procunier v Martinez,*416 US 396, 419 [1974]; *see Benjamin v Fraser,*264 F3d 175, 184 [2d Cir 2001]; Dept of Correction and Community Supervision Directive No. 4404). Petitioner was deprived of such an opportunity, which amounted to unjustifiable interference with his right to “marshal the facts and prepare a defense” under the circumstances of this case and requires dismissal of the remaining charge and expungement from his institutional record *(Wolff v McDonnell,*418 US at 564; *see Matter of Rosario v Selsky,*162 AD2d 939, 940 [1990]).

Petitioner’s remaining arguments, including any issues regarding his request for reconsideration, are rendered academic in light of the foregoing.

Peters, PJ., Lahtinen, Stein and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination dated January 9, 2012 is annulled, without costs, petition granted to that extent, and the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision is directed to expunge all references to this matter from petitioner’s institutional record; petition otherwise dismissed as academic.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-1030

___________

In re: Marilyn M. Moss, also *

known as Marilyn M. Bryant, *

also known as Marilyn Margaret *

Bryant, also known as Marilyn Moss *

Bryant, also known as M. Margaret *

Bryant, also known as Marilyn Wall *

Bryant, also known as Margaret *

Whitman Bryant, also known as *

Margaret “Peggy” Whitman, also *

known as Margaret Whitman “Peggy” *

Bryant, also known as Margaret *

Bryant, also known as Marge Bryant, *

also known as Mari Bryant, also known *

as Mary Bryant, also known as Anne * Appeal from the United States

Bryant, also known as Ann Whitman, * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

also known as P. M. Whitman, also * for the Eighth Circuit.

known as Anne Margaret Whitman, *

also known as Anne M. Whitman * [UNPUBLISHED]

Bryant, also known as Anne Margaret *

Whitman Bryant, also known as Anne *

Margaret Whitman Bryant Trust, also *

known as M. Whitman Bryant, also *

known as M. Margaret Whitman *

Bryant, also known as Catherine L. *

Whitman, also known as Bryant Family *

Trust, also known as Solutions, Inc., *

also known as Santa Barbara Mortgage *

Co., Inc., also known as National *

Supply Corporation, also known as TCI *

Industries, also known as TCI *
-2-

Investments, also known as T.N. Ayrb *

Inv. Co., also known as *

Transpacific Conservancy, Inc., also *

known as M. Margaret Whitman *

Bryant Trust Dated April 18, 1997, *

also known as M. Margaret Whitman *

Bryant Trust Dated May 18, 1997, *

*

Debtor, *

*

----------------------------- *

*

Steven C. Block, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellee, *

*

v. *

*

Marilyn M. Moss; *

*

Defendant - Appellant, *

*

Citizens Bank, of Tulsa, *

*

Defendant, *

------------------------------ *

*

Steven C. Block, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellee, *

*

v. *

*

Marilyn M. Moss; *

*

Defendant - Appellant, *
1

The Honorable Jerry W. Venters, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.

-3-

*

Prudential Securities, Inc. *

*

Defendant. *

___________

 Submitted: July 2, 2002

 Filed: July 9, 2002

___________

Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Debtor Marilyn Moss appeals the bankruptcy appellate panel’s affirmance of

the bankruptcy court’s1

 order holding the trustee was entitled to the turnover of bank

account funds. Reviewing the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact for clear error and

its conclusions of law de novo, see In re Zepecki, 277 F.3d 1041, 1045 (8th Cir.

2002) (per curiam), we find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TERRELL MICKELS, #11733-003 :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 15-0117-KD-C

JUDGE WILLIAM STEELE, :

Defendant. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the 

issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation 

to which objection (Doc. 10) is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 

(Doc. 6) made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and dated March 4, 2016 is ADOPTED as the 

opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED with 

prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii) as 

frivolous because the defendant is immune.1

DONE and ORDERED this 11th day of May 2016.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 1 To the extent Petitioner’s “Notice of Government Telepathy” seeks a motion for extension of 

time to file an objection, the request is MOOT. (Doc. 9)

Case 1:15-cv-00117-KD-C Document 11 Filed 05/12/16 Page 1 of 1
TREATTORNEY GENERAL 

OFTEXAS 

AUSTIN. TICXAS 78711 

October 14, 1977 

Honorable Clayton T. Garrison Opinion No. H- 1072 

Executive Director 

Texas Parks & Wildlife Department Re: Taking of shrimp 

4200 Smith School Road within one mile of a 

Austin, Texas 70744 city. 

Dear Mr. Garrison: 

You have requested our opinion regarding the use of 

shrimp trawls under certain provisions of the Parks and 

Wildlife Code., Section 136.043 of the Code states, in 

pertinent part: \ 

(a) No person may attempt to take 

any fish, shrimp, green turtle, 

loggerhead, or terrapin by the 

use of a seine, drag, fyke, setnet, trammel net, trap, dam, or 

weir from a bay or other navigable water in Chambers County 

within one mile of the limits 

of a city. 

Sections 184.023, 201.012 and 335,023 make the same provisions with respect to Galveston, Harris and Victoria 

counties, respectively. 

Although, prior to 1973, there was some question as 

to whether the predecessor statute of these regulations, 

article 947 of the former Penal Code, had been superseded 

by article 4075b, V.T.C.S., the Texas Shrimp Conservation 

Act, any doubt was resolved by the re-enactment of article 

947 in the 63rd Legislature, Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., ch. 220, 

at 515. See Attorney General Opinion H-112 (1973). In 

1975, theseprovisions of article 947, now restricted in 

application to Chambers, Galveston, Harris and Victoria 

counties, were transferred to the Parks and Wildlife Code. 

The statutes under consideration do not specifically 

prohibit the taking of shrimp by means of a trawl, which 

has been defined as 

P. 4593 
Honorable Clayton T. Garrison - Page 2 (H-1072) 

a dragnet; specifically, a large conical 

net with a device for keeping its mouth 

open that is dragged along the sea bottom. . . . 

Webster's Third New International Dictionary 2433 (1961).~ However, the statutes do prohibit the use of a drag, the applicable 

definition of which is 

a device (as a . . . net or scoop) for 

dragging under water along the bottom or 

through the water below the surface to . . . 

obtain, or recover objects. 

Id. at 684. A dragnet is "a net that is specially designed to 

bedrawn along the bottom of a body of water." Id. at 684. It 

would thus appear that the word "drag" is of broZ& meaning than 

"dragnet" or "trawl"; in our view the latter terms would be held 

to be within the definition of "drag." Accordingly, it is our 

opinion that the statutes render it unlawful to take shrimp from 

any water in.Chambers, Galveston, Harris and Victoria Counties 

within one mile of a city by use of a trawl as defined above. 

SUMMARY 

Under sections 136.043, 184.023, 201.012 

and 335.023 of the Parks and Wildlife 

Code, it is unlawful to take shrimp from 

any water in Chambers, Galveston, Harris 

and Victoria Counties, within one mile 

of a city, by use of a trawl. 

Very truly yours, 

Assistant 

Opinion Committee 

jst 

p. 4594
dlcr_ex1012.htm

EXHIBIT 10.12



	 
	
1








	






	 
	
2








	






	 
	
3








	






	 
	
4








	






	 
	
5








	






	 
	
6








	






	 
	
7








	






	 
	
8








	






 

 

9
Ex-99.4 Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distribution to
        Certificatesholders.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    Class           Interest           Principle            Losses          Ending Balance
    -----           --------           ---------            ------          --------------
<S>                 <C>                 <C>                            <C>   <C>
A1                  4,497,623.28        6,397,721.38                   -     119,836,278.62
A2                  1,799,828.99                   -                   -      49,650,455.00
A3                  1,245,041.91        3,873,642.66                   -      31,841,695.34
A4                    299,316.24                   -                   -       8,257,000.00
A5                     81,005.64                   -                   -       2,234,638.00
A6                     36,250.02                   -                   -       1,000,000.00
A7                     36,250.02                   -                   -       1,000,000.00
B1                    377,587.63           41,499.81                   -      10,391,800.19
B2                    159,922.75           17,576.75                   -       4,401,323.25
B3                     93,284.97           10,252.74                   -       2,567,347.26
B4                     53,305.17            5,858.65                   -       1,467,041.35
B5                     35,539.20            3,906.05                   -         978,093.95
B6                     44,426.09            4,882.75                   -       1,222,675.25
P                              -            2,661.48                   -         283,007.14
R                           0.66              100.00                   -                  -
X1                    663,198.95                   -                   -                  -
X2                    547,021.46                   -                   -                  -
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1





SYMBION, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Report of Symbion, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard E. Francis, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    With the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Richard E. Francis, Jr.Richard E. Francis, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerDate:March 25, 2011
Exhibit 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                   CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CYTOMEDIX, INC.

                          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 and in connection with the annual report of
Cytomedix, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, I,
Kshitij Mohan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

      1.    The Company's 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004,
            fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Company's 10-KSB for the fiscal
            year ended December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
            Company for said period.

/s/Kshitij Mohan
----------------------
Kshitij Mohan

Date:  March 30, 2005

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Cytomedix, Inc.
and will be retained by Cytomedix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.