# Patent

## Title
Nucleic acids encoding nitrilases

## Abstract

The invention relates to nitrilases and to nucleic acids encoding the nitrilases. In addition methods of designing new nitrilases and method of use thereof are also provided. The nitrilases have increased activity and stability at increased pH and temperature.

## Background
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/629,818, filed Dec. 2, 2009, currently pending; which is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 12/397,204, filed Mar. 3, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,651,849 issued on Jan. 26, 2010; which is a divisional application of U.S. Ser. No. 10/146,772, filed May 15, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,521,216, issued Apr. 21, 2009; which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/351,336, filed Jan. 22, 2002; and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/309,006, filed Jul. 30, 2001; and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/300,189, filed Jun. 21, 2001; and U.S. Ser. No. 10/146,722 is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 09/751,299, filed Dec. 28, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,300,775, issued Nov. 27, 2007; which claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/254,414, filed Dec. 7, 2000; and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/173,609, filed Dec. 29, 1999. These applications are hereby expressly incorporated by reference into the subject application in their entireties for all purposes.


COPYRIGHT NOTIFICATION
Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §1.71(e), a portion of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
REFERENCE TO SEQUENCE LISTING SUBMITTED VIA EFS-WEB
This application comprises a sequence listing submitted via the USPTO EFS-WEB server, as authorized and set forth in MPEP §1730 II.B.2(a)(C). The entire content of this sequence listing is hereby incorporated by reference into the specification of this application in its entirety and for all purposes. The sequence listing is identified on the electronically filed ASC II (.txt) text file as follows:












File Name
Date of Creation
Size (bytes)







D14406D3_SEQListing
Jun. 24, 2001
762 KB (780,659 bytes)









FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates generally to the field of molecular biology, biochemistry and chemistry, and particularly to enzymatic proteins having nitrilase activity. The invention also relates to polynucleotides encoding the enzymes, and to uses of such polynucleotides and enzymes.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
There are naturally occurring enzymes which have great potential for use in industrial chemical processes for the conversion of nitrites to a wide range of useful products and intermediates. Such enzymes include nitrilases which are capable of converting nitriles directly to carboxylic acids. Nitrilase enzymes are found in a wide range of mesophilic micro-organisms, including species of Bacillus, Norcardia, Bacteridium, Rhodococcus, Micrococcus, Brevibacterium, Alcaligenes, Acinetobacter, Corynebacterium, Fusarium and Klebsiella. Additionally, there are thermophilic nitrilases which exist in bacteria.
There are two major routes from a nitrile to an analogous acid: (1) a nitrilase catalyzes the direct hydrolysis of a nitrile to a carboxylic acid with the concomitant release of ammonia; or (2) a nitrile hydratase adds a molecule of water across the carbon-nitrogen bonding system to give the corresponding amide, which can then act as a substrate for an amidase enzyme which hydrolyzes the carbon-nitrogen bond to give the carboxylic acid product with the concomitant release of ammonia. The nitrilase enzyme therefore provides the more direct route to the acid.
A nitrile group offers many advantages in devising synthetic routes in that it is often easily introduced into a molecular structure and can be carried through many processes as a masked acid or amide group. This is only of use, however, if the nitrile can be unmasked at the relevant step in the synthesis. Cyanide represents a widely applicable C1-synthon (cyanide is one of the few water-stable carbanions) which can be employed for the synthesis of a carbon framework. However, further transformations of the nitrile thus obtained are impeded due to the harsh reaction conditions required for its hydrolysis using normal chemical synthesis procedures. The use of enzymes to catalyze the reactions of nitrites is attractive because nitrilase enzymes are able to effect reactions with fewer environmentally hazardous reagents and by-products than in many traditional chemical methods. Indeed, the chemoselective biocatalytic hydrolysis of nitrites represents a valuable alternative because it occurs at ambient temperature and near physiological pH.
The importance of asymmetric organic synthesis in drug design and discovery has fueled the search for new synthetic methods and chiral precursors which can be utilized in developing complex molecules of biological interest. One important class of chiral molecules are the α-substituted carboxylic acids, which include the α-amino acids. These molecules have long been recognized as important chiral precursors to a wide variety of complex biologically active molecules, and a great deal of research effort has been dedicated to the development of methods for the synthesis of enantiomerically pure α-amino acids and chiral medicines.
Of particular use to synthetic chemists who make chiral medicines would be an enzyme system which is useful under non-sterile conditions, which is useful in non-biological laboratories, which is available in a form convenient for storage and use; which has broad substrate specificity, which acts on poorly water soluble substrates; which has predictable product structure; which provides a choice of acid or amide product; and which is capable of chiral differentiation. Accordingly, there is a need for efficient, inexpensive, high-yield synthetic methods for producing enantiomerically pure α-substituted carboxylic acids, such as, for example, α-amino acids and α-hydroxy acids.
Throughout this application, various publications are referenced by author and date. The disclosures of these publications in their entireties are hereby incorporated by reference into this application in order to more fully describe the state of the art as known to those skilled therein as of the date of the invention described and claimed herein.
SUMMARY
The present invention is directed to an isolated nucleic acid comprising consecutive nucleotides having a sequence at least 50% identical to SEQ ID NO:1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89, 91, 93, 95, 97, 99, 101, 103, 105, 107, 109, 111, 113, 115, 117, 119, 121, 123, 125, 127, 129, 131, 133, 135, 137, 139, 141, 143, 145, 147, 149, 151, 153, 155, 157, 159, 161, 163, 165, 167, 169, 171, 173, 175, 177, 179, 181, 183, 185, 187, 189, 191, 193, 195, 197, 199, 201, 203, 205, 207, 209, 211, 213, 215, 217, 219, 221, 223, 225, 227, 229, 231, 233, 235, 237, 239, 241, 243, 245, 247, 249, 251, 253, 255, 257, 259, 261, 263, 265, 267, 269, 271, 273, 275, 277, 279, 281, 283, 285, 287, 289, 291, 293, 295, 297, 299, 301, 303, 305, 307, 309, 311, 313, 315, 317, 319, 321, 323, 325, 327, 329, 331, 333, 335, 337, 339, 341, 343, 345, 347, 349, 351, 353, 355, 357, 359, 361, 363, 365, 367, 369, 371, 373, 375, 377, 379, 381, 383, or 385 wherein the nucleic acid encodes a polypeptide having nitrilase activity. In an embodiment of the invention, the nucleic acid comprises consecutive nucleotides having a sequence at least 60%, 70%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 98% or 100% identical to the SEQ ID NO. In an embodiment of the invention, the nucleic acid comprises consecutive nucleotides having a sequence substantially identical to the SEQ ID NO. In another embodiment, the invention provides for an isolated nucleic acid comprising consecutive nucleotides having a sequence at least 79% identical to SEQ ID NO:33, wherein the nucleic acid encodes a polypeptide having nitrilase activity. The invention provides for a fragment of the nucleic acid, wherein the fragment encodes a polypeptide having nitrilase activity. The invention also provides for an isolated nucleic acid complementary to any of the nucleic acids. The invention also provides for an isolated nucleic acid that hybridizes to any one of the nucleic acids under stringent conditions. In one embodiment, the stringent conditions comprise at least 50% formamide, and about 37° C. to about 42° C.
The invention provides for a nucleic acid probe comprising from about 15 nucleotides to about 50 nucleotides, wherein at least 15 consecutive nucleotides are at least 50% complementary to a nucleic acid target region within a nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89, 91, 93, 95, 97, 99, 101, 103, 105, 107, 109, 111, 113, 115, 117, 119, 121, 123, 125, 127, 129, 131, 133, 135, 137, 139, 141, 143, 145, 147, 149, 151, 153, 155, 157, 159, 161, 163, 165, 167, 169, 171, 173, 175, 177, 179, 181, 183, 185, 187, 189, 191, 193, 195, 197, 199, 201, 203, 205, 207, 209, 211, 213, 215, 217, 219, 221, 223, 225, 227, 229, 231, 233, 235, 237, 239, 241, 243, 245, 247, 249, 251, 253, 255, 257, 259, 261, 263, 265, 267, 269, 271, 273, 275, 277, 279, 281, 283, 285, 287, 289, 291, 293, 295, 297, 299, 301, 303, 305, 307, 309, 311, 313, 315, 317, 319, 321, 323, 325, 327, 329, 331, 333, 335, 337, 339, 341, 343, 345, 347, 349, 351, 353, 355, 357, 359, 361, 363, 365, 367, 369, 371, 373, 375, 377, 379, 381, 383, or 385. In one embodiment, the nucleic acid probe comprises consecutive nucleotides which are at least 55% complementary to the nucleic acid target region. In one embodiment, the invention provides for a nucleic acid probe, wherein the consecutive nucleotides are at least 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98% or 100% complementary to the nucleic acid target region. In another embodiment, the nucleic acid consists essentially of from about 20 to about 50 nucleotides.
The invention provides for a nucleic acid vector capable of replication in a host cell, wherein the vector comprises the nucleic acid of the invention. The invention also provides for a host cell comprising the nucleic acid. The invention also provides for a host organism comprising the host cell. In one embodiment, the host organism comprises a gram negative bacterium, a gram positive bacterium or a eukaryotic organism. In another embodiment, the gram negative bacterium comprises Escherichia coli, or Pseudomonas fluorescens. In a further embodiment, the gram positive bacterium comprises Streptomyces diversa, Lactobacillus gasseri, Lactococcus lactis, Lactococcus cremoris, or Bacillus subtilis. In a further embodiment, the eukaryotic organism comprises Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Pichia pastoris, Kluyveromyces lactis, Hansenula plymorpha, or Aspergillus niger. 
The invention provides for an isolated nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide comprising consecutive amino acids having a sequence at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, 86, 88, 90, 92, 94, 96, 98, 100, 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118, 120, 122, 124, 126, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 138, 140, 142, 144, 146, 148, 150, 152, 154, 156, 158, 160, 162, 164, 166, 168, 170, 172, 174, 176, 178, 180, 182, 184, 186, 188, 190, 192, 194, 196, 198, 200, 202, 204, 206, 208, 210, 212, 214, 216, 218, 220, 222, 224, 226, 228, 230, 232, 234, 236, 238, 240, 242, 244, 246, 248, 250, 252, 254, 256, 258, 260, 262, 264, 266, 268, 270, 272, 274, 276, 278, 280, 282, 284, 286, 288, 290, 292, 294, 296, 298, 300, 302, 304, 306, 308, 310, 312, 314, 316, 318, 320, 322, 324, 326, 328, 330, 332, 334, 336, 338, 340, 342, 344, 346, 348, 350, 352, 354, 356, 358, 360, 362, 364, 366, 368, 370, 372, 374, 376, 378, 380, 382, 384 or 386 wherein the polypeptide has nitrilase activity. In one embodiment, the polypeptide comprises consecutive amino acids having at least 60%, 70%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 98% or 100% identity to the SEQ ID NO.
The invention also provides for an isolated nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide comprising at least 10 consecutive amino acids having a sequence identical to a portion of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, 86, 88, 90, 92, 94, 96, 98, 100, 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118, 120, 122, 124, 126, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 138, 140, 142, 144, 146, 148, 150, 152, 154, 156, 158, 160, 162, 164, 166, 168, 170, 172, 174, 176, 178, 180, 182, 184, 186, 188, 190, 192, 194, 196, 198, 200, 202, 204, 206, 208, 210, 212, 214, 216, 218, 220, 222, 224, 226, 228, 230, 232, 234, 236, 238, 240, 242, 244, 246, 248, 250, 252, 254, 256, 258, 260, 262, 264, 266, 268, 270, 272, 274, 276, 278, 280, 282, 284, 286, 288, 290, 292, 294, 296, 298, 300, 302, 304, 306, 308, 310, 312, 314, 316, 318, 320, 322, 324, 326, 328, 330, 332, 334, 336, 338, 340, 342, 344, 346, 348, 350, 352, 354, 356, 358, 360, 362, 364, 366, 368, 370, 372, 374, 376, 378, 380, 382, 384 or 386.
An isolated polypeptide comprising consecutive amino acids having a sequence at least 50% identical to SEQ ID NO:2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, 86, 88, 90, 92, 94, 96, 98, 100, 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118, 120, 122, 124, 126, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 138, 140, 142, 144, 146, 148, 150, 152, 154, 156, 158, 160, 162, 164, 166, 168, 170, 172, 174, 176, 178, 180, 182, 184, 186, 188, 190, 192, 194, 196, 198, 200, 202, 204, 206, 208, 210, 212, 214, 216, 218, 220, 222, 224, 226, 228, 230, 232, 234, 236, 238, 240, 242, 244, 246, 248, 250, 252, 254, 256, 258, 260, 262, 264, 266, 268, 270, 272, 274, 276, 278, 280, 282, 284, 286, 288, 290, 292, 294, 296, 298, 300, 302, 304, 306, 308, 310, 312, 314, 316, 318, 320, 322, 324, 326, 328, 330, 332, 334, 336, 338, 340, 342, 344, 346, 348, 350, 352, 354, 356, 358, 360, 362, 364, 366, 368, 370, 372, 374, 376, 378, 380, 382, 384, or 386 wherein the polypeptide has nitrilase activity. In one embodiment of the invention, the polypeptide comprises consecutive amino acids having a sequence at least 60%, 70%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 98% or 100% identical to the SEQ ID NO.
The invention provides an isolated nucleic acid comprising consecutive nucleotides having a sequence as set forth in any one of the following SEQ ID NOS:1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89, 91, 93, 95, 97, 99, 101, 103, 105, 107, 109, 111, 113, 115, 117, 119, 121, 123, 125, 127, 129, 131, 133, 135, 137, 139, 141, 143, 145, 147, 149, 151, 153, 155, 157, 159, 161, 163, 165, 167, 169, 171, 173, 175, 177, 179, 181, 183, 185, 187, 189, 191, 193, 195, 197, 199, 201, 203, 205, 207, 209, 211, 213, 215, 217, 219, 221, 223, 225, 227, 229, 231, 233, 235, 237, 239, 241, 243, 245, 247, 249, 251, 253, 255, 257, 259, 261, 263, 265, 267, 269, 271, 273, 275, 277, 279, 281, 283, 285, 287, 289, 291, 293, 295, 297, 299, 301, 303, 305, 307, 309, 311, 313, 315, 317, 319, 321, 323, 325, 327, 329, 331, 333, 335, 337, 339, 341, 343, 345, 347, 349, 351, 353, 355, 357, 359, 361, 363, 365, 367, 369, 371, 373, 375, 377, 379, 381, 383, or 385 (hereinafter referred to as “Group A nucleic acids”). The invention is also directed to nucleic acids having specified minimum percentages of sequence identity to any of the Group A nucleic acids sequences.
In another aspect, the invention provides a purified polypeptide comprising consecutive amino acid residues having a sequence as set forth in any one of the following SEQ ID NOS:2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, 86, 88, 90, 92, 94, 96, 98, 100, 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118, 120, 122, 124, 126, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 138, 140, 142, 144, 146, 148, 150, 152, 154, 156, 158, 160, 162, 164, 166, 168, 170, 172, 174, 176, 178, 180, 182, 184, 186, 188, 190, 192, 194, 196, 198, 200, 202, 204, 206, 208, 210, 212, 214, 216, 218, 220, 222, 224, 226, 228, 230, 232, 234, 236, 238, 240, 242, 244, 246, 248, 250, 252, 254, 256, 258, 260, 262, 264, 266, 268, 270, 272, 274, 276, 278, 280, 282, 284, 286, 288, 290, 292, 294, 296, 298, 300, 302, 304, 306, 308, 310, 312, 314, 316, 318, 320, 322, 324, 326, 328, 330, 332, 334, 336, 338, 340, 342, 344, 346, 348, 350, 352, 354, 356, 358, 360, 362, 364, 366, 368, 370, 372, 374, 376, 378, 380, 382, 384 and 386 (hereinafter referred to as “Group B amino acid sequences”). The invention is also directed to purified polypeptides having specified minimum percentages of sequence identity to any of the Group B amino acid sequences.
The invention provides for a fragment of the polypeptide which is at least 50 amino acids in length, and wherein the fragment has nitrilase activity. Furthermore, the invention provides for a peptidomimetic of the polypeptide or a fragment thereof having nitrilase activity. The invention provides for a codon-optimized polypeptide or a fragment thereof, having nitrilase activity, wherein the codon usage is optimized for a particular organism or cell. Narum et al. Infect. Immun. 2001 December, 69(12):7250-3 describes codon-optimization in the mouse system. Outchkourov et al. Protein Expr. Purif. 2002 February; 24(1):18-24 describes codon-optimization in the yeast system. Feng et al. Biochemistry 2000 December 19, 39(50):15399-409 describes codon-optimization in E. coli. Humphreys et al. Protein Expr. Purif. 2000 November, 20(2):252-64 describes how codon usage affects secretion in E. coli. 
In one embodiment, the organism or cell comprises a gram negative bacterium, a gram positive bacterium or a eukaryotic organism. In another embodiment of the invention, the gram negative bacterium comprises Escherichia coli, or Pseudomonas fluorescens. In another embodiment of the invention, the gram positive bacterium comprise Streptomyces diversa, Lactobacillus gasseri, Lactococcus lactis, Lactococcus cremoris, or Bacillus subtilis. In another embodiment of the invention, the eukaryotic organism comprises Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Pichia pastoris, Kluyveromyces lactis, Hansenula plymorpha, or Aspergillus niger. 
In another aspect, the invention provides for a purified antibody that specifically binds to the polypeptide of the invention or a fragment thereof, having nitrilase activity. In one embodiment, the invention provides for a fragment of the antibody that specifically binds to a polypeptide having nitrilase activity.
The invention provides for an enzyme preparation which comprises at least one of the polypeptides of the invention, wherein the preparation is liquid or dry. The enzyme preparation includes a buffer, cofactor, or second or additional protein. In one embodiment the preparation is affixed to a solid support. In one embodiment of the invention, the solid support can be a gel, a resin, a polymer, a ceramic, a glass, a microelectrode and any combination thereof. In another embodiment, the preparation can be encapsulated in a gel or a bead.
The invention further provides for a composition which comprises at least one nucleic acid of the invention which comprises at least one polypeptide of the invention or a fragment thereof, or a peptidomimetic thereof, having nitrilase activity, or any combination thereof.
The invention provides for a method for hydrolyzing a nitrile to a carboxylic acid comprising contacting the molecule with at least one polypeptide of the invention or a fragment thereof, or a peptidomimetic thereof, having nitrilase activity, under conditions suitable for nitrilase activity. In one embodiment, the conditions comprise aqueous conditions. In another embodiment, the conditions comprise a pH of about 8.0 and/or a temperature from about 37° C. to about 45° C.
The invention provides for a method for hydrolyzing a cyanohydrin moiety or an aminonitrile moiety of a molecule, the method comprising contacting the molecule with at least one polypeptide of the invention, or a fragment thereof, or a peptidomimetic thereof, having nitrilase activity, under conditions suitable for nitrilase activity.
The invention provides for a method for making a chiral α-hydroxy acid molecule, a chiral amino acid molecule, a chiral β-hydroxy acid molecule, or a chiral gamma-hydroxy acid molecule, the method comprising admixing a molecule having a cyanohydrin moiety or an aminonitrile moiety with at least one polypeptide having an amino acid sequence at least 50% identical to any one of the Group B amino acid sequences or a fragment thereof, or a peptidomimetic thereof, having enantio-selective nitrilase activity. In one embodiment, the chiral molecule is an (R)-enantiomer. In another embodiment, the chiral molecule is an (S)-enantiomer. In one embodiment of the invention, one particular enzyme can have R-specificity for one particular substrate and the same enzyme can have S-specificity for a different particular substrate.
The invention also provides for a method for making a composition or an intermediate thereof, the method comprising admixing a precursor of the composition or intermediate, wherein the precursor comprises a cyanohydrin moiety or an aminonitrile moiety, with at least one polypeptide of the invention or a fragment or peptidomimetic thereof having nitrilase activity, hydrolyzing the cyanohydrin or the aminonitrile moiety in the precursor thereby making the composition or the intermediate thereof. In one embodiment, the composition or intermediate thereof comprises (S)-2-amino-4-phenyl butanoic acid. In a further embodiment, the composition or intermediate thereof comprises an L-amino acid. In a further embodiment, the composition comprises a food additive or a pharmaceutical drug.
The invention provides for a method for making an (R)-ethyl 4-cyano-3-hydroxybutyric acid, the method comprising contacting a hydroxyglutaryl nitrile with at least one polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of the Group B amino acid sequences, or a fragment or peptidomimetic thereof having nitrilase activity that selectively produces an (R)-enantiomer, so as to make (R)-ethyl 4-cyano-3-hydroxybutyric acid. In one embodiment, the ee is at least 95% or at least 99%. In another embodiment, the hydroxyglutaryl nitrile comprises 1,3-di-cyano-2-hydroxy-propane or 3-hydroxyglutaronitrile. In a further embodiment, the polypeptide has an amino acid sequence of any one of the Group B amino acid sequences, or a fragment or peptidomimetic thereof having nitrilase activity.
The invention also provides a method for making an (S)-ethyl 4-cyano-3-hydroxybutyric acid, the method comprising contacting a hydroxyglutaryl nitrile with at least one polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of the Group B amino acid sequences, or a fragment or peptidomimetic thereof having nitrilase activity that selectively produces an (S)-enantiomer, so as to make (S)-ethyl 4-cyano-3-hydroxybutyric acid.
The invention provides a method for making an (R)-mandelic acid, the method comprising admixing a mandelonitrile with at least one polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of any one of the Group B amino acid sequences or any fragment or peptidomimetic thereof having appropriate nitrilase activity. In one embodiment, the (R)-mandelic acid comprises (R)-2-chloromandelic acid. In another embodiment, the (R)-mandelic acid comprises an aromatic ring substitution in the ortho-, meta-, or para-positions; a 1-naphthyl derivative of (R)-mandelic acid, a pyridyl derivative of (R)-mandelic acid or a thienyl derivative of (R)-mandelic acid or a combination thereof.
The invention provides a method for making an (S)-mandelic acid, the method comprising admixing a mandelonitrile with at least one polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of Group B sequences or any fragment or peptidomimetic thereof having nitrilase activity. In one embodiment, the (S)-mandelic acid comprises (S)-methyl benzyl cyanide and the mandelonitrile comprises (S)-methoxy-benzyl cyanide. In one embodiment, the (S)-mandelic acid comprises an aromatic ring substitution in the ortho-, meta-, or para-positions; a 1-naphthyl derivative of (S)-mandelic acid, a pyridyl derivative of (S)-mandelic acid or a thienyl derivative of (S)-mandelic acid or a combination thereof.
The invention also provides a method for making an (S)-phenyl lactic acid derivative or an (R)-phenyllactic acid derivative, the method comprising admixing a phenyllactonitrile with at least one polypeptide selected from the group of the Group B amino acid sequences or any active fragment or peptidomimetic thereof that selectively produces an (S)-enantiomer or an (R)-enantiomer, thereby producing an (S)-phenyl lactic acid derivative or an (R)-phenyl lactic acid derivative.
The invention provides for a method for making the polypeptide of the invention or a fragment thereof, the method comprising (a) introducing a nucleic acid encoding the polypeptide into a host cell under conditions that permit production of the polypeptide by the host cell, and (b) recovering the polypeptide so produced.
The invention provides for a method for generating a nucleic acid variant encoding a polypeptide having nitrilase activity, wherein the variant has an altered biological activity from that which naturally occurs, the method comprising (a) modifying the nucleic acid by (i) substituting one or more nucleotides for a different nucleotide, wherein the nucleotide comprises a natural or non-natural nucleotide; (ii) deleting one or more nucleotides, (iii) adding one or more nucleotides, or (iv) any combination thereof. In one embodiment, the non-natural nucleotide comprises inosine. In another embodiment, the method further comprises assaying the polypeptides encoded by the modified nucleic acids for altered nitrilase activity, thereby identifying the modified nucleic acid(s) encoding a polypeptide having altered nitrilase activity. In one embodiment, the modifications of step (a) are made by PCR, error-prone PCR, shuffling, oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis, assembly PCR, sexual PCR mutagenesis, in vivo mutagenesis, cassette mutagenesis, recursive ensemble mutagenesis, exponential ensemble mutagenesis, site-specific mutagenesis, gene reassembly, gene site saturated mutagenesis, ligase chain reaction, in vitro mutagenesis, ligase chain reaction, oligonucleotide synthesis, any DNA-generating technique and any combination thereof. In another embodiment, the method further comprises at least one repetition of the modification step (a).
The invention further provides a method for making a polynucleotide from two or more nucleic acids, the method comprising: (a) identifying regions of identity and regions of diversity between two or more nucleic acids, wherein at least one of the nucleic acids comprises a nucleic acid of the invention; (b) providing a set of oligonucleotides which correspond in sequence to at least two of the two or more nucleic acids; and, (c) extending the oligonucleotides with a polymerase, thereby making the polynucleotide.
The invention further provides a screening assay for identifying a nitrilase, the assay comprising: (a) providing a plurality of nucleic acids or polypeptides comprising at least one of the nucleic acids of the invention, or at least one of the polypeptides of the invention; (b) obtaining polypeptide candidates to be tested for nitrilase activity from the plurality; (c) testing the candidates for nitrilase activity; and (d) identifying those polypeptide candidates which are nitrilases. In one embodiment, the method further comprises modifying at least one of the nucleic acids or polypeptides prior to testing the candidates for nitrilase activity. In another embodiment, the testing of step (c) further comprises testing for improved expression of the polypeptide in a host cell or host organism. In a further embodiment, the testing of step (c) further comprises testing for nitrilase activity within a pH range from about pH 3 to about pH 12. In a further embodiment, the testing of step (c) further comprises testing for nitrilase activity within a pH range from about pH 5 to about pH 10. In another embodiment, the testing of step (c) further comprises testing for nitrilase activity within a temperature range from about 4° C. to about 80° C. In another embodiment, the testing of step (c) further comprises testing for nitrilase activity within a temperature range from about 4° C. to about 55° C. In another embodiment, the testing of step (c) further comprises testing for nitrilase activity which results in an enantioselective reaction product. In another embodiment, the testing of step (c) further testing for nitrilase activity which results in a regio-selective reaction product.
The invention provides for use of the nucleic acids of the invention, or a fragment or peptidomimetic thereof having nitrilase activity, in a process designed to optimize an aspect of the gene or an aspect of the polypeptide encoded by the gene. In one embodiment, the process comprises introducing modifications into the nucleotide sequence of the nucleic acid. In another embodiment, the modifications are introduced by PCR, error-prone PCR, shuffling, oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis, assembly PCR, sexual PCR mutagenesis, in vivo mutagenesis, cassette mutagenesis, recursive ensemble mutagenesis, exponential ensemble mutagenesis, site-specific mutagenesis, gene reassembly, gene site saturated mutagenesis, ligase chain reaction, in vitro mutagenesis, ligase chain reaction, oligonucleotide synthesis, any other DNA-generating technique or any combination thereof. In a further embodiment, the process is repeated.
The invention provides for use of the polypeptide of the invention, or a fragment or peptidomimetic thereof having nitrilase activity, in an industrial process. In one embodiment, the process is for production of a pharmaceutical composition, the process is for production of a chemical, the process is for production of a food additive, the process is catalyzing the breakdown of waste, or the process is production of a drug intermediate. In a further embodiment, the process comprises use of the polypeptide to hydrolyze a hydroxyglutarylnitrile substrate. In a further embodiment, the process is for production of LIPITORTM. In another embodiment, the polypeptide used comprises a polypeptide having consecutive amino acids of the sequence SEQ ID NO:44, 196, 208, 210, or 238 or a fragment thereof having nitrilase activity. In another embodiment, the process is production of a detergent. In another embodiment, the process is production of a food product.
The invention provides for use of a nucleic acid of the invention, or a fragment thereof encoding a polypeptide having nitrilase activity, in the preparation of a transgenic organism.
The invention provides for a kit comprising (a) the nucleic acid of the inventions, or a fragment thereof encoding a polypeptide having nitrilase activity, or (b) the polypeptide of the invention, or a fragment or a peptidomimetic thereof having nitrilase activity, or a combination thereof; and (c) a buffer.
The invention provides for a method for modifying a molecule comprising: (a) mixing a polypeptide of the invention or a fragment or peptidomimetic thereof having nitrilase activity, with a starting molecule to produce a reaction mixture; (b) reacting the starting molecule with the polypeptide to produce the modified molecule.
The invention provides for a method for identifying a modified compound comprising: (a) admixing a polypeptide of the invention, or a fragment or peptidomimetic thereof having nitrilase activity, with a starting compound to produce a reaction mixture and thereafter a library of modified starting compounds; (b) testing the library to determine whether a modified starting compound is present within the library which exhibits a desired activity; (c) identifying the modified compound exhibiting the desired activity.
The invention provides for a computer readable medium having stored thereon at least one nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID NO:1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89, 91, 93, 95, 97, 99, 101, 103, 105, 107, 109, 111, 113, 115, 117, 119, 121, 123, 125, 127, 129, 131, 133, 135, 137, 139, 141, 143, 145, 147, 149, 151, 153, 155, 157, 159, 161, 163, 165, 167, 169, 171, 173, 175, 177, 179, 181, 183, 185, 187, 189, 191, 193, 195, 197, 199, 201, 203, 205, 207, 209, 211, 213, 215, 217, 219, 221, 223, 225, 227, 229, 231, 233, 235, 237, 239, 241, 243, 245, 247, 249, 251, 253, 255, 257, 259, 261, 263, 265, 267, 269, 271, 273, 275, 277, 279, 281, 283, 285, 287, 289, 291, 293, 295, 297, 299, 301, 303, 305, 307, 309, 311, 313, 315, 317, 319, 321, 323, 325, 327, 329, 331, 333, 335, 337, 339, 341, 343, 345, 347, 349, 351, 353, 355, 357, 359, 361, 363, 365, 367, 369, 371, 373, 375, 377, 379, 381, 383, and 385 and/or at least one amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID NO:2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, 86, 88, 90, 92, 94, 96, 98, 100, 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118, 120, 122, 124, 126, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 138, 140, 142, 144, 146, 148, 150, 152, 154, 156, 158, 160, 162, 164, 166, 168, 170, 172, 174, 176, 178, 180, 182, 184, 186, 188, 190, 192, 194, 196, 198, 200, 202, 204, 206, 208, 210, 212, 214, 216, 218, 220, 222, 224, 226, 228, 230, 232, 234, 236, 238, 240, 242, 244, 246, 248, 250, 252, 254, 256, 258, 260, 262, 264, 266, 268, 270, 272, 274, 276, 278, 280, 282, 284, 286, 288, 290, 292, 294, 296, 298, 300, 302, 304, 306, 308, 310, 312, 314, 316, 318, 320, 322, 324, 326, 328, 330, 332, 334, 336, 338, 340, 342, 344, 346, 348, 350, 352, 354, 356, 358, 360, 362, 364, 366, 368, 370, 372, 374, 376, 378, 380, 382, 384 and 386.
The invention provides for a computer system comprising a processor and a data storage device, wherein the data storage device has stored thereon at least one nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89, 91, 93, 95, 97, 99, 101, 103, 105, 107, 109, 111, 113, 115, 117, 119, 121, 123, 125, 127, 129, 131, 133, 135, 137, 139, 141, 143, 145, 147, 149, 151, 153, 155, 157, 159, 161, 163, 165, 167, 169, 171, 173, 175, 177, 179, 181, 183, 185, 187, 189, 191, 193, 195, 197, 199, 201, 203, 205, 207, 209, 211, 213, 215, 217, 219, 221, 223, 225, 227, 229, 231, 233, 235, 237, 239, 241, 243, 245, 247, 249, 251, 253, 255, 257, 259, 261, 263, 265, 267, 269, 271, 273, 275, 277, 279, 281, 283, 285, 287, 289, 291, 293, 295, 297, 299, 301, 303, 305, 307, 309, 311, 313, 315, 317, 319, 321, 323, 325, 327, 329, 331, 333, 335, 337, 339, 341, 343, 345, 347, 349, 351, 353, 355, 357, 359, 361, 363, 365, 367, 369, 371, 373, 375, 377, 379, 381, 383 and 385 and/or at least one amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID NO:2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, 86, 88, 90, 92, 94, 96, 98, 100, 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118, 120, 122, 124, 126, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 138, 140, 142, 144, 146, 148, 150, 152, 154, 156, 158, 160, 162, 164, 166, 168, 170, 172, 174, 176, 178, 180, 182, 184, 186, 188, 190, 192, 194, 196, 198, 200, 202, 204, 206, 208, 210, 212, 214, 216, 218, 220, 222, 224, 226, 228, 230, 232, 234, 236, 238, 240, 242, 244, 246, 248, 250, 252, 254, 256, 258, 260, 262, 264, 266, 268, 270, 272, 274, 276, 278, 280, 282, 284, 286, 288, 290, 292, 294, 296, 298, 300, 302, 304, 306, 308, 310, 312, 314, 316, 318, 320, 322, 324, 326, 328, 330, 332, 334, 336, 338, 340, 342, 344, 346, 348, 350, 352, 354, 356, 358, 360, 362, 364, 366, 368, 370, 372, 374, 376, 378, 380, 382, 384 and 386. In one embodiment, the computer system further comprises a sequence comparison algorithm and a data storage device having at least one reference sequence stored thereon. In another embodiment, the sequence comparison algorithm comprises a computer program that identifies polymorphisms.
The invention provides for a method for identifying a feature in a sequence which comprises: (a) inputting the sequence into a computer; (b) running a sequence feature identification program on the computer so as to identify a feature within the sequence; and (c) identifying the feature in the sequence, wherein the sequence comprises at least one of SEQ ID NOS:1-386 or any combination thereof.
The invention provides for an assay for identifying a functional fragment of a polypeptide which comprises: (a) obtaining a fragment of at least one polypeptide of the invention; (b) contacting at least one fragment from step (a) with a substrate having a cyanohydrin moiety or an aminonitrile moiety under reaction conditions suitable for nitrilase activity; (c) measuring the amount of reaction product produced by each at least one fragment from step (b); and (d) identifying the at least one fragment which is capable of producing a nitrilase reaction product; thereby identifying a functional fragment of the polypeptide. In one embodiment, the fragment of step (a) is obtained by synthesizing the fragment. In another embodiment, the fragment of step (a) is obtained by fragmenting the polypeptides.
The invention provides for an assay for identifying a functional variant of a polypeptide which comprises: (a) obtaining at least one variant of at least one polypeptide of the invention; (b) contacting at least one variant from step (a) with a substrate having a cyanohydrin moiety or an aminonitrile moiety under reaction conditions suitable for nitrilase activity; (c) measuring the amount of reaction product produced by each at least one variant from step (b); and (d) identifying the at least one variant which is capable of producing a nitrilase reaction product; thereby identifying a functional variant of the polypeptide.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 shows chemical reaction schemes wherein stereoselective nitrilases hydrolyze a cyanohydrin or an aminonitrile to produce a chiral α-hydroxy acid or α-amino acid.
FIG. 2 illustrates an OPA based cyanide detection assay used for identifying the presence of nitrilase activity.
FIG. 3 is an illustration of a spectroscopic system for the detection and quantification of α-hydroxy acids based on stereoselective lactate dehydrogenases.
FIG. 4 is an illustration of a spectroscopic system for the detection and quantification of α-amino acids based on stereoselective amino acid oxidase.
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating the steps of a nitrilase screening method.
FIGS. 6A-6E are chromatograms characteristic of the substrate and product combination for D-phenylglycine showing a blank sample (FIG. 6A), an enzymatic reaction sample (FIG. 6B); a negative control consisting of cell lysate in buffer (FIG. 6C); a chiral analysis of phenylglycine (FIG. 6D); and coelution of the nitrile peak with the D-enantiomer (FIG. 6E).
FIGS. 7A-7E illustrate chromatograms which are characteristic of substrate and product combinations for (R)-2-chloromandelic acid. FIG. 7A shows only 2-chloromandelonitrile in buffer; FIG. 7B shows a cloromandelic acid standard. The chromatogram in FIG. 7C shows the appearance of product and the reduction of substrate peaks.
FIGS. 8A-8B illustrate chromatograms characteristic of substrate and product combinations for (S)-phenyllactic acid.
FIGS. 9A-9B illustrate chromatograms characteristic of substrate and product combinations for L-2-methylphenylglycine.
FIGS. 10A-10C illustrate chromatograms characteristic of substrate and product combinations for L-tert-leucine.
FIGS. 11A-11C illustrate chromatograms characteristic of substrate and product combinations for (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid.
FIGS. 12A-12D illustrate chromatograms characteristic of substrate and product combinations for 4-methyl-D-leucine and 4-methyl-L-leucine.
FIGS. 13A-13B illustrate chromatograms characteristic of substrate and product combinations for (S)-cyclohexylmandelic acid.



DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to nitrilases, nucleic acids encoding nitrilases, and uses therefor. As used herein, the term “nitrilase” encompasses any polypeptide having nitrilase activity, i.e., the ability to hydrolyze nitriles into their corresponding carboxylic acids and ammonia. Nitrilases have commercial utility as biocatalysts for use in the synthesis of enantioselective aromatic and aliphatic amino acids or hydroxy acids.
Nitrilase chemistry is as follows:




A nitrilase reaction for the preparation of hydroxy acids is as follows:




A nitrilase reaction for the preparation of amino acids is as follows:




In addition, in each of the foregoing hydrolysis reactions, two water molecules are consumed and one ammonia molecule is released.
There are several different types of assays which can be performed to test for the presence of nitrilase activity in a sample or to test whether a particular polypeptide exhibits nitrilase activity. For example, assays can detect the presence or absence of products or by-products from a chemical reaction catalyzed by a nitrilase. For example, the presence of nitrilase activity can be detected by the production of α-hydroxy acids or α-amino acids from, respectively, cyanohydrins or aminonitriles, and the level of nitrilase activity can be quantified by measuring the relative quantities of the reaction products produced. FIG. 1 shows chemical reaction schemes using stereoselective nitrilases to create chiral α-hydroxy acids or α-amino acids in high yield. The starting material is an aldehyde or an imine which is produced from an aldehyde by reaction with ammonia. Reaction of the aldehyde or imine with hydrogen cyanide results in the production of enantiomeric mixtures of the corresponding cyanohydrins and aminonitriles. A stereoselective nitrilase can then be used to stereoselectively convert one enantiomer into the corresponding α-hydroxy acid or α-amino acid. FIG. 3 illustrates schematically the stereoselective nitrilase-dependent production and spectrophotometric detection of α-hydroxy acids based on lactate dehydrogenase conversion of the α-hydroxy acids to the corresponding α-keto acids and concomitant oxidation-reduction of a detectable dye. FIG. 4 illustrates schematically the stereoselective nitrilase-dependent production and spectrophotometric detection of α-amino acids based on amino acid oxidase conversion of the α-amino acids to the corresponding α-keto acids and concomitant oxidation-reduction of a detectable dye.
Nitrilases contemplated for use in the practice of the present invention include those which stereoselectively hydrolyze nitriles or cyanohydrins into their corresponding acids and ammonia. Nitrilases include, for example, those set forth in the Group B amino acid sequences). Some nitrilases which stereoselectively hydrolyze their substrates are set forth in the Tables hereinbelow.
The nitrilases of the invention share the following additional characteristics: (1) full-length amino acid sequences from about 333 amino acids to about 366 amino acids, (2) aggregation and activity as homo-multimers of about 2 subunits to about 16 subunits, (3) presence of a catalytic triad of the consecutive amino acids Glu-Lys-Cys, (4) pH optima from about pH 5 to about pH 9, and (5) temperature optima from about 0° C. to about 100° C., or from about 40° C. to about 50° C.
Consensus Sequences Among New Nitrilases
The nitrilases disclosed herein were studied using bioinformatics and sequence comparison programs and the following consensus information was collected. Three regions of conserved motifs were identified within the nitrilase polypeptides. These correspond to the catalytic triad (E-K-C) present in nitrilase enzymes. (H. Pace and C. Brenner (Jan. 15, 2001) “The Nitrilase Superfamily: classification, structure and function” Genome Biology Vol. 2, No. 1, pp 1-9.)
The abbreviations used herein are conventional one letter codes for the amino acids: A, alanine; B, asparagine or aspartic acid; C, cysteine; D aspartic acid; E, glutamate, glutamic acid; F, phenylalanine; G, glycine; H histidine; I isoleucine; K, lysine; L, leucine; M, methionine; N, asparagine; P, proline; Q, glutamine; R, arginine; S, serine; T, threonine; V, valine; W, tryptophan; Y, tyrosine; Z, glutamine or glutamic acid. See L. Stryer, Biochemistry, 1988, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.
The computer sequence comparisons made among the nitrilase polypeptide sequences of the invention resulted in the identification of these motifs within each amino acid sequence:




The following residues (those that are underlined) are completely conserved among all of the identified nitrilases: the third amino acid in the first motif or region (E, glutamate); the second residue in the second motif (R, arginine); the third residue in the second motif (K, lysine); the third residue in the third motif (C, cysteine); and the fifth residue in the third motif (E, glutamate).
In the boxes, upper case letters indicate 90% or greater consensus among the nitrilases of the invention, while lower case letters indicate 50% or greater consensus. An italicized letter indicates 30% or greater consensus among the nitrilases of the invention. A dot in a box indicates a residue which is not conserved.
The sequences of nitrilases in the nitrilase branch of the nitrilase superfamily were described as having a catalytic triad in the Pace and Brenner article (Genome Biology, 2001, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-9). However, the catalytic triad regions of the nitrilases of this invention differ from those previously identified in the Pace and Brenner reference in the following ways:
Differences in the first motif: The F in the first box of the first motif is conserved in 90% of the nitrilases of the invention, rather than in only 50% of those previously identified. The fourth residue of the first motif is a “t”, threonine in the nitrilases of this invention, and it is found at 50% or greater consensus. However, that residue was identified by Pace and Brenner as “a” (alanine). The last residue of the first motif was identified as “f” (phenylalanine) and was indicated to occur at 50% or greater consensus. However, the nitrilases of this invention only show “f” (phenylalanine occurring at 30% consensus.
Differences in the second motif: There is an “r” (arginine) in the first box of the second motif of the nitrilases of this invention. However, the Pace and Brenner consensus shows an “h” (histidine) in that position. The “R” (arginine) in the second box is completely conserved in the nitrilases of the present invention, however that residue only appears at 90% consensus in the Pace and Brenner reference. The “L” (leucine) in the fourth box of the second motif is conserved in 90% or more of the nitrilases of this invention. However, the Pace and Brenner nitrilases only showed conservation of that residue in 50% of the sequences. Similarly, the “P” (proline) at the sixth box of the second motif is conserved in 90% or more of the nitrilases of this invention. However, the Pace and Brenner nitrilases only showed conservation of that residue in 50% of the sequences.
Differences in the third motif: The “L in the first box is conserved at 90% or greater in the nitrilases of the invention. However, the Pace and Brenner reference only shows that residue appearing 50% of the time. Finally, the sixth box in the third motif in the nitrilases of the invention show a histidine 50% of the time or more. However, the Pace and Brenner reference indicates that that position shows an asparagine (“n”) 50% of the time.
The invention provides for an isolated polypeptide having nitrilase activity which polypeptide comprises three regions, wherein the first region comprises five amino acids and wherein the first amino acid of the first region is F and the fourth amino acid of the first region is T. The invention also provides for an isolated polypeptide having nitrilase activity which polypeptide comprises three regions, wherein the second region comprises seven amino acids and wherein the first amino acid of the second region is R, wherein the second amino acid of the second region is R, and wherein the sixth amino acid of the second region is P. The invention also provides for an isolated polypeptide having nitrilase activity which polypeptide comprises three regions, wherein the third region comprises nine amino acids and wherein the first amino acid of the third region is L and the sixth amino acid of the third region is H.
The invention also provides for an isolated polypeptide having nitrilase activity which polypeptide comprises three consenus subsequences, wherein the first consensus subsequence is FPETF, wherein the second consensus subsequence is RRKLXPT, and wherein the third consensus subsequence is LXCWEHXXP.
The invention also provides for an isolated polypeptide having nitrilase activity which polypeptide comprises three consenus subsequences, wherein the first consensus subsequence is FPEXX, wherein the second consensus subsequence is XRKLXPT, and wherein the third consensus subsequence is LXCWEXXXP.
In accordance with the present invention, methods are provided for producing enantiomerically pure α-substituted carboxylic acids. The enantiomerically pure α-substituted carboxylic acids produced by the methods of the present invention have the following structure:




    
    
        wherein:
        R1≠R2 and R1 and R2 are otherwise independently —H, substituted or unsubstituted alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, aryl, heteroaryl, cycloalkyl, or heterocyclic, wherein said substituents are lower alkyl, hydroxy, alkoxy, amino, mercapto, cycloalkyl, heterocyclic, aryl, heteroaryl, aryloxy, or halogen or optionally R1 and R2 are directly or indirectly covalently joined to form a functional cyclic moiety, and E is —N(Rx)2 or —OH, wherein each Rx is independently —H or lower alkyl.
    
    


As used herein, the term “alkyl” refers to straight or branched chain or cyclic hydrocarbon groups of from 1 to 24 carbon atoms, including methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, isobutyl, tert-butyl, n-pentyl, n-hexyl, and the like. The term “lower alkyl” refers to monovalent straight or branched chain or cyclic radicals of from one to about six carbon atoms.
As used herein, “alkenyl” refers to straight or branched chain or cyclic hydrocarbon groups having one or more carbon-carbon double bonds, and having in the range of about 2 to about 24 carbon atoms.
As used herein, “alkynyl” refers to straight or branched chain or cyclic hydrocarbon groups having at least one carbon-carbon triple bond, and having in the range of about 2 to about 24 carbon atoms.
As used herein, “cycloalkyl” refers to cyclic hydrocarbon groups containing in the range of about 3 to about 14 carbon atoms.
As used herein, “heterocyclic” refers to cyclic groups containing one or more heteroatoms (e.g., N, O, S, P, Se, B, etc.) as part of the ring structure, and having in the range of about 3 to about 14 carbon atoms.
As used herein, “aryl” refers to aromatic groups (i.e., cyclic groups with conjugated double-bond systems) having in the range of about 6 to about 14 carbon atoms.
As used herein with respect to a chemical group or moiety, the term “substituted” refers to such a group or moiety further bearing one or more non-hydrogen substituents. Examples of such substituents include, without limitation, oxy (e.g., in a ketone, aldehyde, ether, or ester), hydroxy, alkoxy (of a lower alkyl group), amino, thio, mercapto (of a lower alkyl group), cycloalkyl, substituted cycloalkyl, heterocyclic, substituted heterocyclic, aryl, substituted aryl, heteroaryl, substituted heteroaryl, aryloxy, substituted aryloxy, halogen, trifluoromethyl, cyano, nitro, nitrone, amino, amido, —C(O)H, acyl, oxyacyl, carboxyl, carbamate, sulfonyl, sulfonamide, sulfuryl, and the like.
In preferred embodiments, the enantiomerically pure α-substituted carboxylic acid produced by the methods of the present invention is an α-amino acid or α-hydroxy acid. In some embodiments, the enantiomerically pure α-amino acid is D-phenylalanine, D-phenylglycine, L-methylphenylglycine, L-tert-leucine, D-alanine, or D-hydroxynorleucine ((S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid), R-pantolactone, 2-chloromandelic acid, or (S)— or (R)-mandelic acid and the enantiomerically pure α-hydroxy acid is (S)-cyclohexylmandelic acid. As used herein, a “small molecule” encompasses any molecule having a molecular weight from at least 25 Daltons.
The term “about” is used herein to mean approximately, roughly, around, or in the region of. When the term “about” is used in conjunction with a numerical range, it modifies that range by extending the boundaries above and below the numerical values set forth. In general, the term “about” is used herein to modify a numerical value above and below the stated value by a variance of 20 percent up or down (higher or lower).
As used herein, the word “or” means any one member of a particular list and also includes any combination of members of that list.
The phrase “nucleic acid” as used herein refers to a naturally occurring or synthetic oligonucleotide or polynucleotide, whether DNA or RNA or DNA-RNA hybrid, single-stranded or double-stranded, sense or antisense, which is capable of hybridization to a complementary nucleic acid by Watson-Crick base-pairing. Nucleic acids of the invention can also include nucleotide analogs (e.g., BrdU), and non-phosphodiester internucleoside linkages (e.g., peptide nucleic acid (PNA) or thiodiester linkages). In particular, nucleic acids can include, without limitation, DNA, RNA, cDNA, gDNA, ssDNA or dsDNA or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, a “nucleic acid” of the invention includes, for example, a nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide as set forth in the Group B amino acid sequences, and variants thereof. The phrase “a nucleic acid sequence” as used herein refers to a consecutive list of abbreviations, letters, characters or words, which represent nucleotides. In one embodiment, a nucleic acid can be a “probe” which is a relatively short nucleic acid, usually less than 100 nucleotides in length. Often a nucleic acid probe is from about 50 nucleotides in length to about 10 nucleotides in length. A “target region” of a nucleic acid is a portion of a nucleic acid that is identified to be of interest.
A “coding region” of a nucleic acid is the portion of the nucleic acid which is transcribed and translated in a sequence-specific manner to produce into a particular polypeptide or protein when placed under the control of appropriate regulatory sequences. The coding region is said to encode such a polypeptide or protein.
The term “gene” refers to a coding region operably joined to appropriate regulatory sequences capable of regulating the expression of the polypeptide in some manner. A gene includes untranslated regulatory regions of DNA (e.g., promoters, enhancers, repressors, etc.) preceding (upstream) and following (downstream) the coding region (open reading frame, ORF) as well as, where applicable, intervening sequences (i.e., introns) between individual coding regions (i.e., exons).
“Polypeptide” as used herein refers to any peptide, oligopeptide, polypeptide, gene product, expression product, or protein. A polypeptide is comprised of consecutive amino acids. The term “polypeptide” encompasses naturally occurring or synthetic molecules.
In addition, as used herein, the term “polypeptide” refers to amino acids joined to each other by peptide bonds or modified peptide bonds, e.g., peptide isosteres, and may contain modified amino acids other than the 20 gene-encoded amino acids. The polypeptides can be modified by either natural processes, such as post-translational processing, or by chemical modification techniques which are well known in the art. Modifications can occur anywhere in the polypeptide, including the peptide backbone, the amino acid side-chains and the amino or carboxyl termini. It will be appreciated that the same type of modification can be present in the same or varying degrees at several sites in a given polypeptide. Also a given polypeptide can have many types of modifications. Modifications include, without limitation, acetylation, acylation, ADP-ribosylation, amidation, covalent cross-linking or cyclization, covalent attachment of flavin, covalent attachment of a heme moiety, covalent attachment of a nucleotide or nucleotide derivative, covalent attachment of a lipid or lipid derivative, covalent attachment of a phosphytidylinositol, disulfide bond formation, demethylation, formation of cysteine or pyroglutamate, formylation, gamma-carboxylation, glycosylation, GPI anchor formation, hydroxylation, iodination, methylation, myristolyation, oxidation, pergylation, proteolytic processing, phosphorylation, prenylation, racemization, selenoylation, sulfation, and transfer-RNA mediated addition of amino acids to protein such as arginylation. (See Proteins—Structure and Molecular Properties 2nd Ed., T. E. Creighton, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York (1993); Posttranslational Covalent Modification of Proteins, B. C. Johnson, Ed., Academic Press, New York, pp. 1-12 (1983)).
As used herein, the term “amino acid sequence” refers to a list of abbreviations, letters, characters or words representing amino acid residues.
As used herein, the term “isolated” means that a material has been removed from its original environment. For example, a naturally-occurring polynucleotide or polypeptide present in a living animal is not isolated, but the same polynucleotide or polypeptide, separated from some or all of the coexisting materials in the natural system, is isolated. Such polynucleotides can be part of a vector and/or such polynucleotides or polypeptides could be part of a composition, and would be isolated in that such a vector or composition is not part of its original environment.
As used herein with respect to nucleic acids, the term “recombinant” means that the nucleic acid is covalently joined and adjacent to a nucleic acid to which it is not adjacent in its natural environment. Additionally, as used herein with respect to a particular nucleic acid in a population of nucleic acids, the term “enriched” means that the nucleic acid represents 5% or more of the number of nucleic acids in the population of molecules. Typically, the enriched nucleic acids represent 15% or more of the number of nucleic acids in the population of molecules. More typically, the enriched nucleic acids represent 50%, 90% or more of the number of nucleic acids in the population molecules.
“Recombinant” polypeptides or proteins refer to polypeptides or proteins produced by recombinant DNA techniques, i.e., produced from cells transformed by an exogenous recombinant DNA construct encoding the desired polypeptide or protein. “Synthetic” polypeptides or proteins are those prepared by chemical synthesis (e.g., solid-phase peptide synthesis). Chemical peptide synthesis is well known in the art (see, e.g., Merrifield (1963), Am. Chem. Soc. 85:2149-2154; Geysen et al. (1984), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 81:3998) and synthesis kits and automated peptide synthesizer are commercially available (e.g., Cambridge Research Biochemicals, Cleveland, United Kingdom; Model 431A synthesizer from Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, Calif.). Such equipment provides ready access to the peptides of the invention, either by direct synthesis or by synthesis of a series of fragments that can be coupled using other known techniques.
As used herein with respect to pairs of nucleic acid or amino acid sequences, “identity” refers to the extent to which the two sequences are invariant at positions within the sequence which can be aligned. The percent identity between two given sequences can be calculated using an algorithm such as BLAST (Altschul, et al., (1990), J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410). When using the BLAST algorithm for sequences no longer than 250 nucleotides or about 80 amino acids (“short queries”), the search parameters can be as follows: the filter is off, the scoring matrix is PAM30, the word size is 3 or 2, the E value is 1000 or more, and the gap costs are 11, 1. For sequences longer than 250 nucleotides or 80 amino acid residues, the default search parameters can be used. The BLAST website provides advice for special circumstances which is to be followed in such circumstances.
As used herein, “homology” has the same meaning as “identity” in the context of nucleotide sequences. However, with respect to amino acid sequences, “homology” includes the percentage of identical and conservative amino acid substitutions. Percentages of homology can be calculated according to the algorithms of Smith and Waterman (1981), Adv. Appl. Math. 2:482.
As used herein in the context of two or more nucleic acid sequences, two sequences are “substantially identical” when they have at least 99.5% nucleotide identity, when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence, as measured using the known sequence comparison algorithms described above. In addition, for purposes of determining whether sequences are substantially identical, synonymous codons in a coding region may be treated as identical to account for the degeneracy of the genetic code. Typically, the region for determination of substantial identity must span at least about 20 residues, and most commonly the sequences are substantially identical over at least about 25-200 residues.
As used herein in the context of two or more amino acid sequences, two sequences are “substantially identical” when they have at least 99.5% identity, when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence, as measured using the known sequence comparison algorithms described above. In addition, for purposes of determining whether sequences are substantially identical, conservative amino acid substitutions may be treated as identical if the polypeptide substantially retains its biological function.
“Hybridization” refers to the process by which a nucleic acid strand joins with a complementary strand through hydrogen bonding at complementary bases. Hybridization assays can be sensitive and selective so that a particular sequence of interest can be identified even in samples in which it is present at low concentrations. Stringent conditions are defined by concentrations of salt or formamide in the prehybridization and hybridization solutions, or by the hybridization temperature, and are well known in the art. Stringency can be increased by reducing the concentration of salt, increasing the concentration of formamide, or raising the hybridization temperature. In particular, as used herein, “stringent hybridization conditions” include 42° C. in 50% formamide, 5×SSPE, 0.3% SDS, and 200 ng/ml sheared and denatured salmon sperm DNA, and equivalents thereof. Variations on the above ranges and conditions are well known in the art.
The term “variant” refers to polynucleotides or polypeptides of the invention modified at one or more nucleotides or amino acid residues (respectively) and wherein the encoded polypeptide or polypeptide retains nitrilase activity. Variants can be produced by any number of means including, for example, error-prone PCR, shuffling, oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis, assembly PCR, sexual PCR mutagenesis, in vivo mutagenesis, cassette mutagenesis, recursive ensemble mutagenesis, exponential ensemble mutagenesis, site-specific mutagenesis, gene reassembly, gene site-saturated mutagenesis or any combination thereof.
Methods of making peptidomimetics based upon a known sequence is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,631,280; 5,612,895; and 5,579,250. Use of peptidomimetics can involve the incorporation of a non-amino acid residue with non-amide linkages at a given position. One embodiment of the present invention is a peptidomimetic wherein the compound has a bond, a peptide backbone or an amino acid component replaced with a suitable mimic Examples of unnatural amino acids which may be suitable amino acid mimics include β-alanine, L-α-amino butyric acid, L-γ-amino butyric acid, L-α-amino isobutyric acid, L-ε-amino caproic acid, 7-amino heptanoic acid, L-aspartic acid, L-glutamic acid, N-ε-Boc-N-α-CBZ-L-lysine, N-ε-Boc-N-α-Fmoc-L-lysine, L-methionine sulfone, L-norleucine, L-norvaline, N-α-Boc-N-δCBZ-L-ornithine, N-δ-Boc-N-α-CBZ-L-ornithine, Boc-p-nitro-L-phenylalanine, Boc-hydroxyproline, Boc-L-thioproline.
As used herein, “small molecule” encompasses a molecule having a molecular weight from about 20 Daltons to about 1.5 kiloDaltons.
The molecular biological techniques, such as subcloning, were performed using routine methods which would be well known to one of skill in the art. (Sambrook, J. Fritsch, E F, Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2nd ed.), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview N.Y.).
Table 2 includes the SEQ ID NOS, the Closest Hit (BLAST) Organism, the Closest Hit (BLAST) percentage amino acid identity and the percent nucleotide identity for the nitrilases of the present invention.



























Length of











SEQ ID




Public



Public
Public
NO. (# of
Public


SEQ ID
Top Public
E-
Public
Public
Public EC
Protein %
Nucleotide
Amino
Sequence


NO:
Hit
Value
Definition
Organism
Number
Identity
% Identity
Acids)
Length
























1, 2
gi|15229934|
0.00000006
nitrilase 1
Arabidopsis
N/A
20
N/A
312
346



ref|NP_190017.1|

[Arabidopsis
thaliana





thaliana].
Eukaryota


3, 4
gi|14211396|
8E−56
nitrilase-like
Brassica
N/A
41
51
326
350



gb|AAK57436.1|

protein
napus





[Brassica
Eukaryota





napus].


5, 6
gi|15143035|
e−113
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
62
67
334
346



emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


7, 8
gi|7435980|
9E−63
nitrilase (EC
Nicotiana
3.5.5.1
41
50
332
348



pir||T03739

3.5.5.1) 4B -
tabacum





common
Eukaryota





tobacco.


9, 10
gi|7435980|
1E−55
nitrilase (EC
Nicotiana
3.5.5.1
39
48
314
348



pir||T03739

3.5.5.1) 4B -
tabacum





common
Eukaryota





tobacco.


11,
gi|15795659|
5E−42
unnamed protein
Rhodococcus
N/A
32
46
321
366


12
emb|CAC88237.1|

product
rhodochrous





[Rhodococcus
Bacteria





rhodochrous].


13,
gi|15143035|
e−109
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
62
66
337
346


14
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


15,
gi|15143035|
e−131
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
65
64
348
346


16
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


17,
gi|7435978|
e−100
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
52
58
330
346


18
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


19,
gi|15143035|
e−107
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
55
60
349
346


20
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


21,
gi|15143035|
e−111
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
59
63
354
346


22
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


23,
gi|7435978|
e−101
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
55
57
334
346


24
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


25,
gi|4835588|
2E−50
nitrilase-like
Oryza sativa
N/A
38
48
312
362


26
dbj|BAA77679.1|

protein [Oryza
Eukaryota





sativa].


27,
gi|15242205|
4E−62
Nitrilase 4 (sp
Arabidopsis
N/A
38
N/A
351
355


28
ref|NP_197622.1|

P46011)
thaliana





[Arabidopsis
Eukaryota





thaliana].


29,
gi|15143035|
e−106
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
61
66
338
346


30
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


31,
gi|14211396|
3E−51
nitrilase-like
Brassica
N/A
38
49
310
350


32
gb|AAK57436.1|

protein
napus





[Brassica
Eukaryota





napus].


33,
gi|15143035|
e−150
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
80
78
341
346


34
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


35,
gi|15902867|
0.00000002
Beta-alanine
Streptococcus
N/A
21
41
313
291


36
ref|NP_358417.1|

synthase or
pneumoniae





beta-
R6 Bacteria





ureidopropionase





[Streptococcus





pneumoniae





R6].


37,
gi|15143037|
2E−56
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
39
47
330
337


38
emb|CAC50777.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


39,
gi|7435978|
1E−97
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
50
58
335
346


40
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


41,
gi|6624886|
2E−60
nitrilase 2
Arabidopsis
N/A
41
52
321
339


42
emb|CAA68934.3|

[Arabidopsis
thaliana





thaliana].
Eukaryota


43,
gi|7435978|
8E−96
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
51
58
330
346


44
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


45,
gi|4835588|
6E−54
nitrilase-like
Oryza sativa
N/A
39
51
331
362


46
dbj|BAA77679.1|

protein [Oryza
Eukaryota





sativa].


47,
gi|15143037|
e−146
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
74
68
337
337


48
emb|CAC50777.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


49,
gi|7435978|
e−106
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
59
58
345
346


50
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


51,
gi|7510901|
5E−47
probable
Caenorhabditis
3.5.5.1
36
48
298
305


52
pir||T27679

nitrilase (EC
elegans





3.5.5.1)
Eukaryota





ZK1058.6 -





Caenorhabditis





elegans.


53,
gi|7435980|
5E−61
nitrilase (EC
Nicotiana
3.5.5.1
41
51
317
348


54
pir||T03739

3.5.5.1) 4B -
tabacum





common
Eukaryota





tobacco.


55,
gi|15143035|
e−111
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
60
67
338
346


56
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


57,
gi|15143037|
e−146
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
74
68
337
337


58
emb|CAC50777.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


59,
gi|2294001|
9E−50
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
35
49
328
354


60
emb|CAA02248.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


61,
gi|15795659|
2E−43
unnamed protein
Rhodococcus
N/A
33
46
321
366


62
emb|CAC88237.1|

product
rhodochrous





[Rhodococcus
Bacteria





rhodochrous].


63,
gi|4835588|
6E−67
nitrilase-like
Oryza sativa
N/A
44
51
325
362


64
dbj|BAA77679.1|

protein [Oryza
Eukaryota





sativa].


65,
gi|3914163|
5E−63
NITRILASE 4.
Nicotiana
N/A
43
49
333
349


66
sp|Q42965|


tabacum



NRL4_TOBAC


Eukaryota


67,
gi|15242205|
1E−50
Nitrilase 4 (sp
Arabidopsis
N/A
39
N/A
311
355


68
ref|NP_197622.1|

P46011)
thaliana





[Arabidopsis
Eukaryota





thaliana].


69,
gi|7435980|
2E−55
nitrilase (EC
Nicotiana
3.5.5.1
43
48
312
348


70
pir||T03739

3.5.5.1) 4B -
tabacum





common
Eukaryota





tobacco.


71,
gi|7435980|
2E−58
nitrilase (EC
Nicotiana
3.5.5.1
39
52
321
348


72
pir||T03739

3.5.5.1) 4B -
tabacum





common
Eukaryota





tobacco.


73,
gi|15229934|
2E−53
nitrilase 1
Arabidopsis
N/A
34
N/A
344
346


74
ref|NP_190017.1|

[Arabidopsis
thaliana





thaliana].
Eukaryota


75,
gi|7435978|
4E−98
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
48
50
374
346


76
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


77,
gi|15242205|
8E−62
Nitrilase 4 (sp
Arabidopsis
N/A
38
N/A
351
355


78
ref|NP_197622.1|

P46011)
thaliana





[Arabidopsis
Eukaryota





thaliana].


79,
gi|7435980|
5E−54
nitrilase (EC
Nicotiana
3.5.5.1
38
46
329
348


80
pir||T03739

3.5.5.1) 4B -
tabacum





common
Eukaryota





tobacco.


81,
gi|7435978|
3E−94
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
51
56
330
346


82
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


83,
gi|7435978|
e−114
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
61
59
356
346


84
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


85,
gi|15143035|
e−115
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
63
66
337
346


86
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


87,
gi|1469912|
3E−54
nitrilase 2.
Arabidopsis
N/A
36
46
353
339


88
gb|AAB05220.1|


thaliana






Eukaryota


89,
gi|15242205|
5E−62
Nitrilase 4 (sp
Arabidopsis
N/A
41
N/A
305
355


90
ref|NP_197622.1|

P46011)
thaliana





[Arabidopsis
Eukaryota





thaliana].


91,
gi|14211396|
6E−58
nitrilase-like
Brassica
N/A
35
50
312
350


92
gb|AAK57436.1|

protein
napus





[Brassica
Eukaryota





napus].


93,
gi|7435978|
e−112
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
60
61
325
346


94
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


95,
gi|6624886|
1E−60
nitrilase 2
Arabidopsis
N/A
42
53
321
339


96
emb|CAA68934.3|

[Arabidopsis
thaliana





thaliana].
Eukaryota


97,
gi|15143035|
e−109
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
62
67
338
346


98
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


99,
gi|7435978|
e−123
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
62
61
337
346


100
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


101,
gi|15143035|
e−121
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
62
66
354
346


102
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


103,
gi|15143037|
2E−41
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
34
49
314
337


104
emb|CAC50777.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


105,
gi|7435978|
1E−97
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
54
58
324
346


106
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


107,
gi|7435978|
e−113
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
61
61
326
346


108
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


109,
gi|7435978|
e−113
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
55
57
363
346


110
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


111,
gi|7435978|
e−121
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
64
61
329
346


112
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


113,
gi|15162360|
4E−09
AGR_pAT_799p
Plasmid
N/A
26
47
330
600


114
gb|AAK90913.1|

[Agrobacterium
Agrobacterium





tumefaciens].
tumefaciens






Bacteria


115,
gi|7435978|
e−115
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
59
61
330
346


116
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


117,
gi|7435978|
e−106
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
64
64
318
346


118
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


119,
gi|15795659|
1E−40
unnamed protein
Rhodococcus
N/A
30
49
327
366


120
emb|CAC88237.1|

product
rhodochrous





[Rhodococcus
Bacteria





rhodochrous].


121,
gi|15229932|
1E−45
nitrilase 2
Arabidopsis
N/A
30
N/A
385
339


122
ref|NP_190016.1|

[Arabidopsis
thaliana





thaliana].
Eukaryota


123,
gi|14211396|
9E−52
nitrilase-like
Brassica
N/A
35
51
329
350


124
gb|AAK57436.1|

protein
napus





[Brassica
Eukaryota





napus].


125,
gi|7435978|
e−125
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
63
61
349
346


126
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


127,
gi|7435978|
e−117
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
61
60
334
346


128
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


129,
gi|7435978|
e−125
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
64
63
336
346


130
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


131,
gi|7435978|
e−125
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
63
63
336
346


132
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


133,
gi|7435978|
e−120
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
63
60
341
346


134
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


135,
gi|7435978|
e−124
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
64
63
336
346


136
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


137,
gi|7435978|
e−102
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
54
56
325
346


138
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


139,
gi|15143037|
e−123
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
65
63
332
337


140
emb|CAC50777.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


141,
gi|15143037|
3E−49
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
32
47
341
337


142
emb|CAC50777.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


143,
gi|15143037|
8E−55
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
30
44
373
337


144
emb|CAC50777.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


145,
gi|15143035|
e−110
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
58
63
337
346


146
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


147,
gi|15143037|
2E−52
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
33
42
365
337


148
emb|CAC50777.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


149,
gi|15229932|
5E−63
nitrilase 2
Arabidopsis
N/A
43
N/A
313
339


150
ref|NP_190016.1|

[Arabidopsis
thaliana





thaliana].
Eukaryota


151,
gi|7435978|
6E−96
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
51
58
330
346


152
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


153,
gi|7435978|
7E−46
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
31
44
357
346


154
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


155,
gi|15143035|
e−101
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
60
66
346
346


156
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


157,
gi|7435978|
3E−99
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
52
55
336
346


158
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


159,
gi|7435980|
7E−52
nitrilase (EC
Nicotiana
3.5.5.1
41
52
309
348


160
pir||T03739

3.5.5.1) 4B -
tabacum





common
Eukaryota





tobacco.


161,
gi|7435978|
e−111
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
58
60
335
346


162
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


163,
gi|7435978|
e−101
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
57
58
325
346


164
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


165,
gi|15143035|
e−108
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
63
65
335
346


166
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


167,
gi|15143035|
e−111
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
61
66
338
346


168
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


169,
gi|15143035|
e−122
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
60
65
358
346


170
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


171,
gi|6624886|
9E−61
nitrilase 2
Arabidopsis
N/A
38
48
336
339


172
emb|CAA68934.3|

[Arabidopsis
thaliana





thaliana].
Eukaryota


173,
gi|7435978|
e−101
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
54
56
330
346


174
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


175,
gi|15143037|
2E−52
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
39
49
314
337


176
emb|CAC50777.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


177,
gi|15795659|
9E−41
unnamed protein
Rhodococcus
N/A
32
50
315
366


178
emb|CAC88237.1|

product
rhodochrous





[Rhodococcus
Bacteria





rhodochrous].


179,
gi|7435980|
3E−53
nitrilase (EC
Nicotiana
3.5.5.1
38
46
304
348


180
pir||T03739

3.5.5.1) 4B -
tabacum





common
Eukaryota





tobacco.


181,
gi|7435978|
e−121
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
64
61
329
346


182
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


183,
gi|7435978|
e−118
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
63
63
333
346


184
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


185,
gi|15143035|
e−110
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
60
67
338
346


186
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


187,
gi|15143035|
e−113
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
59
62
352
346


188
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


189,
gi|15143035|
e−101
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
56
61
334
346


190
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


191,
gi|15242205|
6E−56
Nitrilase 4 (sp
Arabidopsis
N/A
37
N/A
314
355


192
ref|NP_197622.1|

P46011)
thaliana





[Arabidopsis
Eukaryota





thaliana].


193,
gi|7435980|
3E−58
nitrilase (EC
Nicotiana
3.5.5.1
39
51
321
348


194
pir||T03739

3.5.5.1) 4B -
tabacum





common
Eukaryota





tobacco.


195,
gi|7435978|
5E−89
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
50
57
330
346


196
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


197,
gi|15143035|
e−110
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
65
68
338
346


198
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


199,
gi|11266289|
1E−58
nitrilase 1 -
Arabidopsis
N/A
38
N/A
330
346


200
pir||T49147

Arabidopsis
thaliana





thaliana.
Eukaryota


201,
gi|4835588|
5E−50
nitrilase-like
Oryza sativa
N/A
39
49
309
362


202
dbj|BAA77679.1|

protein [Oryza
Eukaryota





sativa].


203,
gi|7435980|
4E−57
nitrilase (EC
Nicotiana
3.5.5.1
39
50
321
348


204
pir||T03739

3.5.5.1) 4B -
tabacum





common
Eukaryota





tobacco.


205,
gi|7435978|
1E−99
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
55
56
322
346


206
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


207,
gi|7435980|
5E−59
nitrilase (EC
Nicotiana
3.5.5.1
40
51
321
348


208
pir||T03739

3.5.5.1) 4B -
tabacum





common
Eukaryota





tobacco.


209,
gi|7435978|
2E−95
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
53
55
330
346


210
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


211,
gi|15143035|
e−117
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
64
67
353
346


212
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


213,
gi|7435978|
e−101
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
53
57
330
346


214
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


215,
gi|15143035|
e−114
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
62
61
335
346


216
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


217,
gi|15143035|
e−115
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
58
62
336
346


218
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


219,
gi|7435978|
e−101
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
53
59
331
346


220
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


221,
gi|417382|sp|
e−122
ALIPHATIC
Rhodococcus
N/A
58
62
381
383


222
Q02068|

NITRILASE.
rhodochrous



NRL1_RHORH


Bacteria


223,
gi|7435978|
3E−94
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
51
56
331
346


224
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


225,
gi|7435978|
6E−99
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
53
57
316
346


226
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


227,
gi|7435978|
e−121
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
62
60
344
346


228
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


229,
gi|7510901|
3E−48
probable
Caenorhabditis
3.5.5.1
36
48
324
305


230
pir||T27679

nitrilase (EC
elegans





3.5.5.1)
Eukaryota





ZK1058.6 -





Caenorhabditis





elegans.


231,
gi|15143035|
e−125
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
63
65
353
346


232
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


233,
gi|7435978|
e−101
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
54
55
333
346


234
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


235,
gi|7435978|
1E−90
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
51
57
330
346


236
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


237,
gi|7435978|
7E−97
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
53
56
330
346


238
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


239,
gi|7435980|
8E−59
nitrilase (EC
Nicotiana
3.5.5.1
40
50
322
348


240
pir||T03739

3.5.5.1) 4B -
tabacum





common
Eukaryota





tobacco.


241,
gi|6624886|
8E−59
nitrilase 2
Arabidopsis
N/A
40
50
323
339


242
emb|CAA68934.3|

[Arabidopsis
thaliana





thaliana].
Eukaryota


243,
gi|15143037|
2E−51
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
38
47
332
337


244
emb|CAC50777.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


245,
gi|6624886|
5E−56
nitrilase 2
Arabidopsis
N/A
38
50
332
339


246
emb|CAA68934.3|

[Arabidopsis
thaliana





thaliana].
Eukaryota


247,
gi|7435980|
9E−61
nitrilase (EC
Nicotiana
3.5.5.1
42
49
329
348


248
pir||T03739

3.5.5.1) 4B -
tabacum





common
Eukaryota





tobacco.


249,
gi|15143035|
e−113
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
62
67
338
346


250
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


251,
gi|7435978|
e−100
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
55
57
325
346


252
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


253,
gi|7435980|
1E−56
nitrilase (EC
Nicotiana
3.5.5.1
40
51
307
348


254
pir||T03739

3.5.5.1) 4B -
tabacum





common
Eukaryota





tobacco.


255,
gi|15229936|
4E−63
nitrilase 3
Arabidopsis
N/A
40
N/A
334
346


256
ref|NP_190018.1|

[Arabidopsis
thaliana





thaliana].
Eukaryota


257,
gi|4835588|
6E−51
nitrilase-like
Oryza sativa
N/A
38
48
313
362


258
dbj|BAA77679.1|

protein [Oryza
Eukaryota





sativa].


259,
gi|7435978|
e−113
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
60
61
326
346


260
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


261,
gi|15143035|
e−114
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
62
67
337
346


262
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


263,
gi|7435978|
9E−98
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
53
54
337
346


264
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


265,
gi|14590532|
8E−17
hypothetical
Pyrococcus
N/A
21
34
332
262


266
ref|NP_142600.1|

protein
horikoshii





[Pyrococcus
Archaea





horikoshii].


267,
gi|15143035|
e−102
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
53
64
345
346


268
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


269,
gi|15143035|
8E−97
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
57
61
337
346


270
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


271,
gi|15229934|
3E−59
nitrilase 1
Arabidopsis
N/A
41
N/A
321
346


272
ref|NP_190017.1|

[Arabidopsis
thaliana





thaliana].
Eukaryota


273,
gi|7435978|
e−141
nitrilase (EC
Synechocystis
3.5.5.1
69
67
340
346


274
pir||S77025

3.5.5.1) -
sp. Bacteria





Synechocystis





sp. (strain PCC





6803).


275,
gi|7435980|
8E−42
nitrilase (EC
Nicotiana
3.5.5.1
35
48
282
348


276
pir||T03739

3.5.5.1) 4B -
tabacum





common
Eukaryota





tobacco.


277,
gi|15242205|
4E−62
Nitrilase 4 (sp
Arabidopsis
N/A
38
N/A
351
355


278
ref|NP_197622.1|

P46011)
thaliana





[Arabidopsis
Eukaryota





thaliana].


279,
gi|15143035|
e−102
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
57
63
337
346


280
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


281,
gi|7510901|
5E−55
probable
Caenorhabditis
3.5.5.1
39
46
311
305


282
pir||T27679

nitrilase (EC
elegans





3.5.5.1)
Eukaryota





ZK1058.6 -





Caenorhabditis





elegans.


283,
gi|15143035|
e−111
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
61
66
338
346


284
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


285,
gi|15242205|
1E−64
Nitrilase 4 (sp
Arabidopsis
N/A
44
N/A
305
355


286
ref|NP_197622.1|

P46011)
thaliana





[Arabidopsis
Eukaryota





thaliana].


287,
gi|6624886|
2E−55
nitrilase 2
Arabidopsis
N/A
39
51
311
339


288
emb|CAA68934.3|

[Arabidopsis
thaliana





thaliana].
Eukaryota


289,
gi|4835588|
3E−58
nitrilase-like
Oryza sativa
N/A
43
51
306
362


290
dbj|BAA77679.1|

protein [Oryza
Eukaryota





sativa].


291,
gi|15143037|
e−123
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
64
63
333
337


292
emb|CAC50777.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


293,
gi|16331918|
1E−97
nitrilase
Synechocystis
N/A
50
N/A
335
346


294
ref|NP_442646.1|

[Synechocystis
sp. PCC 6803





sp. PCC 6803].
Bacteria


295,
gi|15229932|
6E−35
nitrilase 2
Arabidopsis
N/A
27
N/A
377
339


296
ref|NP_190016.1|

[Arabidopsis
thaliana





thaliana].
Eukaryota


297,
gi|15143037|
3E−44
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
34
47
352
337


298
emb|CAC50777.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


299,
gi|16331918|
e−103
nitrilase
Synechocystis
N/A
56
N/A
328
346


300
ref|NP_442646.1|

[Synechocystis
sp. PCC 6803





sp. PCC 6803].
Bacteria


301,
gi|7435980|
6E−57
nitrilase (EC
Nicotiana
3.5.5.1
37
46
335
348


302
pir||T03739

3.5.5.1) 4B -
tabacum





common
Eukaryota





tobacco.


303,
gi|15143035|
e−112
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
60
59
336
346


304
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


305,
gi|15143035|
e−121
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
59
N/A
355
346


306
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


307,
gi|7435980|
5E−61
nitrilase (EC
Nicotiana
3.5.5.1
43
50
313
348


308
pir||T03739

3.5.5.1) 4B -
tabacum





common
Eukaryota





tobacco.


309,
gi|417382|sp|
1E−43
ALIPHATIC
Rhodococcus
N/A
34
53
316
383


310
Q02068|

NITRILASE.
rhodochrous



NRL1_RHORH


Bacteria


311,
gi|16331918|
e−126
nitrilase
Synechocystis
N/A
64
N/A
336
346


312
ref|NP_442646.1|

[Synechocystis
sp. PCC 6803





sp. PCC 6803].
Bacteria


313,
gi|15143035|
1E−49
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
36
50
328
346


314
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


315,
gi|15229936|
4E−64
nitrilase 3
Arabidopsis
N/A
42
N/A
319
346


316
ref|NP_190018.1|

[Arabidopsis
thaliana





thaliana].
Eukaryota


317,
gi|16331918|
e−102
nitrilase
Synechocystis
N/A
54
N/A
330
346


318
ref|NP_442646.1|

[Synechocystis
sp. PCC 6803





sp. PCC 6803].
Bacteria


319,
gi|16331918|
e−118
nitrilase
Synechocystis
N/A
62
N/A
338
346


320
ref|NP_442646.1|

[Synechocystis
sp. PCC 6803





sp. PCC 6803].
Bacteria


321,
gi|16331918|
e−100
nitrilase
Synechocystis
N/A
53
N/A
330
346


322
ref|NP_442646.1|

[Synechocystis
sp. PCC 6803





sp. PCC 6803].
Bacteria


323,
gi|15229936|
3E−52
nitrilase 3
Arabidopsis
N/A
42
N/A
316
346


324
ref|NP_190018.1|

[Arabidopsis
thaliana





thaliana].
Eukaryota


325,
gi|16331918|
e−121
nitrilase
Synechocystis
N/A
64
N/A
358
346


326
ref|NP_442646.1|

[Synechocystis
sp. PCC 6803





sp. PCC 6803].
Bacteria


327,
gi|7510901|
5E−40
probable
Caenorhabditis
3.5.5.1
30
46
324
305


328
pir||T27679

nitrilase (EC
elegans





3.5.5.1)
Eukaryota





ZK1058.6 -





Caenorhabditis





elegans.


329,
gi|16331918|
e−113
nitrilase
Synechocystis
N/A
60
N/A
340
346


330
ref|NP_442646.1|

[Synechocystis
sp. PCC 6803





sp. PCC 6803].
Bacteria


331,
gi|15143035|
2E−98
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
53
60
346
346


332
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


333,
gi|15143035|
e−111
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
61
63
345
346


334
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


335,
gi|16331918|
e−120
nitrilase
Synechocystis
N/A
62
N/A
350
346


336
ref|NP_442646.1|

[Synechocystis
sp. PCC 6803





sp. PCC 6803].
Bacteria


337,
gi|17557111|
3E−22
Nitrilase
Caenorhabditis
N/A
28
N/A
313
305


338
ref|NP_497791.1|

[Caenorhabditis
elegans





elegans].
Eukaryota


339,
gi|15143035|
5E−25
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
27
N/A
329
346


340
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


341,
gi|15143035|
2E−11
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
26
N/A
342
346


342
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


343,
gi|15229932|
8E−18
nitrilase 2
Arabidopsis
N/A
28
N/A
303
339


344
ref|NP_190016.1|

[Arabidopsis
thaliana





thaliana].
Eukaryota


345,
gi|15143035|
3E−50
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
40
N/A
329
346


346
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


347,
gi|15143037|
2E−11
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
22
N/A
297
337


348
emb|CAC50777.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


349,
gi|417384|sp|
5.00E−86
Aliphatic
Rhodococcus
N/A
43.3
53.7
333
366


350
Q03217|

Nitrilase
rhodochrous


351,
gi|15229936|
1E−11
nitrilase 3
Arabidopsis
N/A
22
N/A
301
346


352
ref|NP_190018.1|

[Arabidopsis
thaliana





thaliana].
Eukaryota


353,
gi|15143035|
2E−10
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
29
N/A
312
346


354
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


355,
gi|17231038|
0.2
heterocyst
Nostoc sp.
N/A
25
N/A
325
779


356
ref|NP_487586.1|

differentiation
PCC 7120





protein [Nostoc
Bacteria





sp. PCC 7120].


357,
gi|15242205|
1E−15
Nitrilase 4 (sp
Arabidopsis
N/A
23
N/A
300
355


358
ref|NP_197622.1|

P46011)
thaliana





[Arabidopsis
Eukaryota





thaliana].


359,
gi|16331918|
1E−58
nitrilase
Synechocystis
N/A
40
N/A
335
346


360
ref|NP_442646.1|

[Synechocystis
sp. PCC 6803





sp. PCC 6803].
Bacteria


361,
gi|15795659|
0.007
unnamed protein
Rhodococcus
N/A
24
N/A
302
366


362
emb|CAC88237.1|

product
rhodochrous





[Rhodococcus
Bacteria





rhodochrous].


363,
gi|16331918|
1E−19
nitrilase
Synechocystis
N/A
22
N/A
335
346


364
ref|NP_442646.1|

[Synechocystis
sp. PCC 6803





sp. PCC 6803].
Bacteria


365,
gi|4835588|
0.004
nitrilase-like
Oryza sativa
N/A
17
N/A
315
362


366
dbj|BAA77679.1|

protein [Oryza
Eukaryota





sativa].


367,
gi|417382|sp|
0.023
ALIPHATIC
Rhodococcus
N/A
18
N/A
317
383


368
Q02068|

NITRILASE.
rhodochrous



NRL1_RHORH


Bacteria


369,
gi|17546542|
0.00000001
PROBABLE
Ralstonia
N/A
19
N/A
346
343


370
ref|NP_519944.1|

NITRILASE
solanacearum





PROTEIN
Bacteria





[Ralstonia





solanacearum].


371,
gi|15143037|
9E−23
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
24
N/A
327
337


372
emb|CAC50777.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


373,
gi|2120606|
7E−47
nitrilase (EC
Comamonas
3.5.5.1
32
N/A
351
354


374
pir||JC4212

3.5.5.1) -
testosteroni





Comamonas
Bacteria





testosteroni.


375,
gi|14211396|
5E−59
nitrilase-like
Brassica
N/A
36
N/A
312
350


376
gb|AAK57436.1|

protein
napus





[Brassica
Eukaryota





napus].


377,
gi|5953961|
1.00E−102
Sequence 1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
349
N/A


378


from patent U.S. Pat. No.





5,872,000.


379,
gi|14211396|
6E−58
nitrilase-like
Brassica
N/A
38
N/A
311
350


380
gb|AAK57436.1|

protein
napus





[Brassica
Eukaryota





napus].


381,
gi|17546542|
2E−40
PROBABLE
Ralstonia
N/A
33
N/A
314
343


382
ref|NP_519944.1|

NITRILASE
solanacearum





PROTEIN
Bacteria





[Ralstonia





solanacearum].


383,
gi|15143037|
e−108
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
55
55
345
337


384
emb|CAC50777.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].


385,
gi|15143035|
e−107
unnamed protein
unidentified
N/A
57
57
337
346


386
emb|CAC50776.1|

product
unclassified.





[unidentified].









Computer Systems
In one aspect of the invention, any nucleic acid sequence and/or polypeptide sequence of the invention can be stored, recorded, and manipulated on any medium which can be read and accessed by a computer. As used herein, the words “recorded” and “stored” refer to a process for storing information on a computer medium. Another aspect of the invention is a computer readable medium having recorded thereon at least 2, 5, 10, 15 or 20 nucleic acid sequences as set forth in SEQ ID NOS:1-386, and sequences substantially identical thereto. In a further embodiment, another aspect is the comparison among and between nucleic acid sequences or polypeptide sequences of the invention and the comparison between sequences of the invention and other sequences by a computer. Computer readable media include magnetically readable media, optically readable media, electronically readable media and magnetic/optical media. For example, the computer readable media may be a hard disk, a floppy disk, a magnetic tape, CD-ROM, Digital Versatile Disk (DVD), Random Access Memory (RAM), or Read Only Memory (ROM) as well as other types of other media known to those skilled in the art.
Embodiments of the invention include systems (e.g., internet based systems), particularly computer systems which store and manipulate the sequence information described herein. As used herein, “a computer system” refers to the hardware components, software components, and data storage components used to analyze a sequence (either nucleic acid or polypeptide) as set forth in at least any one of SEQ ID NOS:1-386 and sequences substantially identical thereto. The computer system typically includes a processor for processing, accessing and manipulating the sequence data. The processor can be any well-known type of central processing unit, such as, for example, the Pentium IIITM from Intel Corporation, or similar processor from Sun, Motorola, Compaq, AMD or International Business Machines.
Typically the computer system is a general purpose system that comprises the processor and one or more internal data storage components for storing data, and one or more data retrieving devices for retrieving the data stored on the data storage components.
In one particular embodiment, the computer system includes a processor connected to a bus which is connected to a main memory (preferably implemented as RAM) and one or more internal data storage devices, such as a hard drive and/or other computer readable media having data recorded thereon. In some embodiments, the computer system further includes one or more data retrieving device for reading the data stored on the internal data storage devices.
The data retrieving device may represent, for example, a floppy disk drive, a compact disk drive, a magnetic tape drive, or a modem capable of connection to a remote data storage system (e.g., via the internet) etc. In some embodiments, the internal data storage device is a removable computer readable medium such as a floppy disk, a compact disk, a magnetic tape, etc. containing control logic and/or data recorded thereon. The computer system may advantageously include or be programmed by appropriate software for reading the control logic and/or the data from the data storage component once inserted in the data retrieving device.
The computer system includes a display which is used to display output to a computer user. It should also be noted that the computer system can be linked to other computer systems in a network or wide area network to provide centralized access to the computer system. In some embodiments, the computer system may further comprise a sequence comparison algorithm A “sequence comparison algorithm” refers to one or more programs which are implemented (locally or remotely) on the computer system to compare a nucleotide sequence with other nucleotide sequences and/or compounds stored within a data storage means.
Uses of Nitrilases
Nitrilases have been identified as key enzymes for the production of chiral α-hydroxy acids, which are valuable intermediates in the fine chemicals industry, and as pharmaceutical intermediates. The nitrilase enzymes of the invention are useful to catalyze the stereoselective hydrolysis of cyanohydrins and aminonitriles, producing chiral α-hydroxy- and α-amino acids, respectively.
Stereoselective enzymes provide a key advantage over chemical resolution methods as they do not require harsh conditions and are more environmentally compatible. The use of nitrilases is of particular interest for the production of chiral amino acids and α-hydroxy acids. Using a stereoselective nitrilase, dynamic resolution conditions can be established, due to the racemisation of the substrate under aqueous conditions. Thus 100% theoretical yields are achievable.
This invention is directed to the nitrilases which have been discovered and isolated from naturally occurring sources. This invention is also directed to evolving novel genes and gene pathways from diverse and extreme environmental sources. In an effort to develop the most extensive assortment of enzymes available, DNA was extracted directly from samples that have been collected from varying habitats around the globe. From these efforts, the largest collection of environmental genetic libraries in the world was developed. Through extensive high-throughput screening of these libraries, 192 new sequence-unique nitrilase enzymes have been discovered to date. Previous to this invention, fewer than 20 microbial-derived nitrilases had been reported in the literature and public databases.
Biocatalysts, such as nitrilases, play an important role in catalyzing metabolic reactions in living organisms. In addition, biocatalysts have found applications in the chemical industry, where they can perform many different reactions. Some examples of the advantages of the use of nitrilases is that they provide: high enantio-, chemo- and regio-selectivity; they function under mild reaction conditions; they provide direct access to products—with minimal protection; they have high catalytic efficiencies; they produce reduced waste compared with the chemical alternatives; they are easily immobilized as enzymes or cells; they are recoverable, recyclable and are capable of being manipulated via molecular biological techniques; they can be regenerated in whole cell processes; they are tolerant to organic solvents; and importantly, they can be evolved or optimized. Optimized nitrilases are presented herein as working examples of the invention.
Nitrilases catalyze the hydrolysis of nitrile moieties generating the corresponding carboxylic acid. Conventional chemical hydrolysis of nitriles requires strong acid or base and high temperature. However, one advantage of the invention is that nitrilases are provided which perform this reaction under mild conditions. Wide ranges of nitrile substrates can be transformed by nitrilases with high enantio-, chemo- and regio-selectivity.











TABLE 3







Some characteristics of Nitrilases of the Invention








Previously Discovered



Nitrilases
New Nitrilases









Limitations
New Features
Benefits





<20 reported
>180 newly discovered
Access to a wider




substrate range


Homologous
Unique nitrilases, many with



little homology to previously



known nitrilases


Narrow substrate
Broad substrate


activity spectrum
activity spectrum


Very few shown to be
Enantioselective; both
Product with high


enantioselective
enantiomers accessible
enantiomeric excess and




minimal waste production


Limited stability profile
Stable in a variety of
Potential use in a wide range



conditions
of process conditions


Inconsistent supply
Consistent supply
Reliable source of product


Not applicable
Amenable to optimization
Good source material leads to




better product









Dynamic Kinetic Resolution: The use of the nitrilases allows discrimination between two rapidly equilibrating enantiomers to give a single product in 100% theoretical yield. Nitrilases are utilized for dynamic resolution of key cyanohydrins and aminonitriles to produce enantiomerically pure α-carboxylic and α-amino acids. Newly discovered nitrilases disclosed herein yield products with >95% enantiomeric excess (ee) with and >95% yield. The nitrilases perform this transformation efficiently under mild conditions in aqueous solution or in the presence of organic solvent.




These products shown above also include the opposite enantiomers, although they are not shown. In one aspect, the invention provides an isolated nucleic acid having a sequence as set forth in any one of the Group A nucleic acid sequences, having a sequence substantially identical thereto, or having a sequence complementary thereto.
In another aspect, the invention provides an isolated nucleic acid including at least 20 consecutive nucleotides identical to a portion of a nucleotide sequence as set forth in the Group A nucleic acid sequences, having a sequence substantially identical thereto, or having a sequence complementary thereto.
In another aspect, the invention provides an isolated nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide having a sequence as set forth in the Group B amino acid sequences, or having a sequence substantially identical thereto.
In another aspect, the invention provides an isolated nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide having at least 10 consecutive amino acids identical to a portion of a sequence as set forth in the Group B amino acid sequences, or having a sequence substantially identical thereto.
In yet another aspect, the invention provides a substantially purified polypeptide comprising consecutive amino acid residues having a sequence as set forth in the Group B amino acid sequences, or having a sequence substantially identical thereto.
In another aspect, the invention provides an isolated antibody that specifically binds to a polypeptide of the invention. The invention also provides for a fragment of the antibody which retains the ability to specifically bind the polypeptide.
In another aspect, the invention provides a method of producing a polypeptide having a sequence as set forth in the Group B amino acid sequences, and sequences substantially identical thereto. The method includes introducing a nucleic acid encoding the polypeptide into a host cell, wherein the nucleic acid is operably joined to a promoter, and culturing the host cell under conditions that allow expression of the nucleic acid.
In another aspect, the invention provides a method of producing a polypeptide having at least 10 consecutive amino acids from a sequence as set forth in the Group B amino acid sequences, and sequences substantially identical thereto. The method includes introducing a nucleic acid encoding the polypeptide into a host cell, wherein the nucleic acid is operably joined to a promoter, and culturing the host cell under conditions that allow expression of the nucleic acid, thereby producing the polypeptide.
In another aspect, the invention provides a method of generating a variant of a nitrilase, including choosing a nucleic acid sequence as set forth in the Group A nucleic acid sequences, and changing one or more nucleotides in the sequence to another nucleotide, deleting one or more nucleotides in the sequence, or adding one or more nucleotides to the sequence.
In another aspect, the invention provides assays for identifying functional variants of the Group B amino acid sequences that retain the enzymatic function of the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences. The assays include contacting a polypeptide comprising consecutive amino acid residues having a sequence identical to a sequence of the Group B amino acid sequences or a portion thereof, having a sequence substantially identical to a sequence of the Group B amino acid sequences or a portion thereof, or having a sequence which is a variant of a sequence of the Group B amino acid sequences that retains nitrilase activity, with a substrate molecule under conditions which allow the polypeptide to function, and detecting either a decrease in the level of substrate or an increase in the level of a specific reaction product of the reaction between the polypeptide and the substrate, thereby identifying a functional variant of such sequences.
Modification of Polypeptides of the Invention
Enzymes are highly selective catalysts. Their hallmark is the ability to catalyze reactions with exquisite stereo-selectivity, regio-selectivity, and chemo-selectivity that is unparalleled in conventional synthetic chemistry. Moreover, enzymes are remarkably versatile. They can be tailored to function in organic solvents, operate at extreme pHs (for example, acidic or basic conditions) extreme temperatures (for example, high temperatures and low temperatures), extreme salinity levels (for example, high salinity and low salinity), and catalyze reactions with compounds that can be structurally unrelated to their natural, physiological substrates except for the enzymatic active site.
The invention provides methods for modifying polypeptides having nitrilase activity or polynucleotides encoding such polypeptides in order to obtain new polypeptides which retain nitrilase activity but which are improved with respect to some desired characteristic. Such improvements can include the ability to function (i.e., exhibit nitrilase activity) in organic solvents, operate at extreme or uncharacteristic pHs, operate at extreme or uncharacteristic temperatures, operate at extreme or uncharacteristic salinity levels, catalyze reactions with different substrates, etc.
The present invention directed to methods of using nitrilases so as to exploit the unique catalytic properties of these enzymes. Whereas the use of biocatalysts (i.e., purified or crude enzymes) in chemical transformations normally requires the identification of a particular biocatalyst that reacts with a specific starting compound, the present invention uses selected biocatalysts and reaction conditions that are specific for functional groups that are present in many starting compounds. Each biocatalyst is specific for one functional group, or several related functional groups, and can react with many starting compounds containing this functional group.
Enzymes react at specific sites within a starting compound without affecting the rest of the molecule, a process which is very difficult to achieve using traditional chemical methods. This high degree of specificity provides the means to identify a single active compound within a library of compounds. The library is characterized by the series of biocatalytic reactions used to produce it, a so-called “biosynthetic history.” Screening the library for biological activities and tracing the biosynthetic history identifies the specific reaction sequence producing the active compound. The reaction sequence is repeated and the structure of the synthesized compound determined. This mode of identification, unlike other synthesis and screening approaches, does not require immobilization technologies, and compounds can be synthesized and tested free in solution using virtually any type of screening assay. It is important to note, that the high degree of specificity of enzyme reactions on functional groups allows for the “tracking” of specific enzymatic reactions that make up the biocatalytically produced library. (For further teachings on modification of molecules, including small molecules, see PCT Application No. PCT/US94/09174, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
In one exemplification, the invention provides for the chimerization of a family of related nitrilase genes and their encoded family of related products. Thus according to this aspect of the invention, the sequences of a plurality of nitrilase nucleic acids (e.g., the Group A nucleic acids) serve as nitrilase “templates” which are aligned using a sequence comparison algorithm such as those described above. One or more demarcation points are then identified in the aligned template sequences, which are located at one or more areas of homology. The demarcation points can be used to delineate the boundaries of nucleic acid building blocks, which are used to generate chimeric nitrilases. Thus, the demarcation points identified and selected in the nitrilase template molecules serve as potential chimerization points in the assembly of the chimeric nitrilase molecules.
Typically, a useful demarcation point is an area of local identity between at least two progenitor templates, but preferably the demarcation point is an area of identity that is shared by at least half of the templates, at least two thirds of the templates, at least three fourths of the templates, or at nearly all of the templates.
The building blocks, which are defined by the demarcation points, can then be mixed (either literally, in solution, or theoretically, on paper or in a computer) and reassembled to form chimeric nitrilase genes. In one embodiment, the gene reassembly process is performed exhaustively in order to generate an exhaustive library of all possible combinations. In other words, all possible ordered combinations of the nucleic acid building blocks are represented in the set of finalized chimeric nucleic acid molecules. At the same time, however, the order of assembly of each building block in the 5′ to 3′ direction in each combination is designed to reflect the order in the templates, and to reduce the production of unwanted, inoperative products.
In some embodiments, the gene reassembly process is performed systematically, in order to generate a compartmentalized library with compartments that can be screened systematically, e.g., one by one. In other words, the invention provides that, through the selective and judicious use of specific nucleic acid building blocks, coupled with the selective and judicious use of sequentially stepped assembly reactions, an experimental design can be achieved where specific sets of chimeric products are made in each of several reaction vessels. This allows a systematic examination and screening procedure to be performed. Thus, it allows a potentially very large number of chimeric molecules to be examined systematically in smaller groups.
In some embodiments, the synthetic nature of the step in which the building blocks are generated or reassembled allows the design and introduction of sequences of nucleotides (e.g., codons or introns or regulatory sequences) that can later be optionally removed in an in vitro process (e.g., by mutagenesis) or in an in vivo process (e.g., by utilizing the gene splicing ability of a host organism). The introduction of these nucleotides may be desirable for many reasons, including the potential benefit of creating a useful demarcation point.
The synthetic gene reassembly method of the invention utilizes a plurality of nucleic acid building blocks, each of which has two ligatable ends. Some examples of the two ligatable ends on each nucleic acid building block includes, but are not limited to, two blunt ends, or one blunt end and one overhang, or two overhangs. In a further, non-limiting example, the overhang can include one base pair, 2 base pairs, 3 base pairs, 4 base pairs or more.
A double-stranded nucleic acid building block can be of variable size. Preferred sizes for building blocks range from about 1 base pair (bp) (not including any overhangs) to about 100,000 base pairs (not including any overhangs). Other preferred size ranges are also provided, which have lower limits of from about 1 by to about 10,000 bp (including every integer value in between), and upper limits of from about 2 bp to about 100,000 bp (including every integer value in between).
According to one embodiment, a double-stranded nucleic acid building block is generated by first generating two single stranded nucleic acids and allowing them to anneal to form a double-stranded nucleic acid building block. The two strands of a double-stranded nucleic acid building block may be complementary at every nucleotide apart from any that form an overhang; thus containing no mismatches, apart from any overhang(s). Alternatively, the two strands of a double-stranded nucleic acid building block can be complementary at fewer than every nucleotide, apart from any overhang(s). In particular, mismatches between the strands can be used to introduce codon degeneracy using methods such as the site-saturation mutagenesis described herein.
In vivo shuffling of molecules is also useful in providing variants and can be performed utilizing the natural property of cells to recombine multimers. While recombination in vivo has provided the major natural route to molecular diversity, genetic recombination remains a relatively complex process that involves (1) the recognition of homologies; (2) strand cleavage, strand invasion, and metabolic steps leading to the production of recombinant chiasma; and finally (3) the resolution of chiasma into discrete recombined molecules. The formation of the chiasma requires the recognition of homologous sequences.
Thus, the invention includes a method for producing a chimeric or recombinant polynucleotide from at least a first polynucleotide and a second polynucleotide in vivo. The invention can be used to produce a recombinant polynucleotide by introducing at least a first polynucleotide and a second polynucleotide which share at least one region of partial sequence homology (e.g., the Group A nucleic acid sequences, and combinations thereof) into a suitable host cell. The regions of partial sequence homology promote processes which result in sequence reorganization producing a recombinant polynucleotide. Such hybrid polynucleotides can result from intermolecular recombination events which promote sequence integration between DNA molecules. In addition, such hybrid polynucleotides can result from intramolecular reductive reassortment processes which utilize repeated sequences to alter a nucleotide sequence within a DNA molecule.
The invention provides a means for generating recombinant polynucleotides which encode biologically active variant polypeptides (e.g., a nitrilase variant). For example, a polynucleotide may encode a particular enzyme from one microorganism. An enzyme encoded by a first polynucleotide from one organism can, for example, function effectively under a particular environmental condition, e.g., high salinity. An enzyme encoded by a second polynucleotide from a different organism can function effectively under a different environmental condition, such as extremely high temperature. A recombined polynucleotide containing sequences from the first and second original polynucleotides encodes a variant enzyme which exhibits characteristics of both enzymes encoded by the original polynucleotides. Thus, the enzyme encoded by the recombined polynucleotide can function effectively under environmental conditions shared by each of the enzymes encoded by the first and second polynucleotides, e.g., high salinity and extreme temperatures.
A variant polypeptide can exhibit specialized enzyme activity not displayed in the original enzymes. For example, following recombination and/or reductive reassortment of polynucleotides encoding nitrilase activity, the resulting variant polypeptide encoded by a recombined polynucleotide can be screened for specialized nitrilase activity obtained from each of the original enzymes, i.e., the temperature or pH at which the nitrilase functions. Sources of the original polynucleotides may be isolated from individual organisms (“isolates”), collections of organisms that have been grown in defined media (“enrichment cultures”), or, uncultivated organisms (“environmental samples”). The use of a culture-independent approach to derive polynucleotides encoding novel bioactivities from environmental samples is most preferable since it allows one to access untapped resources of biodiversity. The microorganisms from which the polynucleotide may be prepared include prokaryotic microorganisms, such as Xanthobacter, Eubacteria and Archaebacteria, and lower eukaryotic microorganisms such as fungi, some algae and protozoa. Polynucleotides may be isolated from environmental samples in which case the nucleic acid may be recovered without culturing of an organism or recovered from one or more cultured organisms. In one aspect, such microorganisms may be extremophiles, such as hyperthermophiles, psychrophiles, psychrotrophs, halophiles, barophiles and acidophiles. Polynucleotides encoding enzymes isolated from extremophilic microorganisms are particularly preferred. Such enzymes may function at temperatures above 100° C. in terrestrial hot springs and deep sea thermal vents, at temperatures below 0° C. in arctic waters, in the saturated salt environment of the Dead Sea, at pH values around 0 in coal deposits and geothermal sulfur-rich springs, or at pH values greater than 11 in sewage sludge.
Examples of mammalian expression systems that can be employed to express recombinant proteins include the COS-7, C127, 3T3, CHO, HeLa and BHK cell lines. Mammalian expression vectors comprise an origin of replication, a suitable promoter and enhancer, and also any necessary ribosome binding sites, polyadenylation site, splice donor and acceptor sites, transcriptional termination sequences, and 5′ flanking nontranscribed sequences. DNA sequences derived from the SV40 splice and polyadenylation sites may be used to provide the required nontranscribed genetic elements. U.S. Pat. No. 6,054,267 is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Host cells containing the polynucleotides of interest can be cultured in conventional nutrient media modified as appropriate for activating promoters, selecting transformants or amplifying genes. The culture conditions, such as temperature, pH and the like, are those previously used with the host cell selected for expression, and will be apparent to the ordinarily skilled artisan. Clones, which are identified as having a desired enzyme activity or other property may then be sequenced to identify the recombinant polynucleotide sequence encoding the enzyme having the desired activity or property.
In one embodiment, the invention provides for the isolated nitrilases as either an isolated nucleic acid or an isolated polypeptide wherein the nucleic acid or the polypeptide was prepared by recovering DNA from a DNA population derived from at least one uncultivated microorganism, and transforming a host with recovered DNA to produce a library of clones which is screened for the specified protein, e.g., nitrilase activity. U.S. Pat. No. 6,280,926, Short, provides descriptions of such methods and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Therefore, in a one embodiment, the invention relates to a method for producing a biologically active recombinant nitrilase polypeptide and screening such a polypeptide for desired activity or property by:

    
    
        1) introducing at least a first nitrilase polynucleotide and a second nitrilase polynucleotide, said at least first nitrilase polynucleotide and second nitrilase polynucleotide sharing at least one region of sequence homology, into a suitable host cell;
        2) growing the host cell under conditions which promote sequence reorganization resulting in a recombinant nitrilase polynucleotide;
        3) expressing a recombinant nitrilase polypeptide encoded by the recombinant nitrilase polynucleotide;
        4) screening the recombinant nitrilase polypeptide for the desired activity or property; and
        5) isolating the recombinant nitrilase polynucleotide encoding the recombinant nitrilase polypeptide.
    
    


Examples of vectors which may be used include viral particles, baculovirus, phage, plasmids, phagemids, cosmids, fosmids, bacterial artificial chromosomes, viral DNA (e.g., vaccinia, adenovirus, fowlpox virus, pseudorabies and derivatives of SV40), P1-based artificial chromosomes, yeast plasmids, yeast artificial chromosomes, and any other vectors specific for the hosts of interest (e.g., Bacillus, Aspergillus and yeast). Large numbers of suitable vectors are known to those of skill in the art, and are commercially available. Examples of bacterial vectors include pQE vectors (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif.); pBluescript plasmids, pNH vectors, and lambda-ZAP vectors (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.); and pTRC99a, pKK223-3, pDR540, and pRIT2T vectors (Pharmacia, Peapack, N.J.). Examples of eukaryotic vectors include pXT1 and pSG5 vectors (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.); and pSVK3, pBPV, pMSG, and pSVLSV40 vectors (Pharmacia, Peapack, N.J.). However, any other plasmid or other vector may be used so long as they are replicable and viable in the host.
A preferred type of vector for use in the present invention contains an f-factor (or fertility factor) origin of replication. The f-factor in E. coli is a plasmid which effects high frequency transfer of itself during conjugation and less frequent transfer of the bacterial chromosome itself. A particularly preferred embodiment is to use cloning vectors referred to as “fosmids” or bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) vectors. These are derived from E. coli f-factor which is able to stably integrate large segments of genomic DNA.
The DNA sequence in the expression vector is operably joined to appropriate expression control sequences, including a promoter, to direct RNA synthesis. Useful bacterial promoters include lacI, lacZ, T3, T7, gpt, lambda PR, PL and trp. Useful eukaryotic promoters include CMV immediate early, HSV thymidine kinase, early and late SV40, LTRs from retrovirus, and mouse metallothionein-I. Selection of the appropriate vector and promoter is well within the level of ordinary skill in the art. The expression vector also contains a ribosome binding site for translation initiation and a transcription terminator. The vector may also include appropriate sequences for amplifying expression. Promoter regions can be selected from any desired gene using CAT (chloramphenicol transferase) vectors or other vectors with selectable markers.
In addition, the expression vectors can contain one or more selectable marker genes to provide a phenotypic trait for selection of transformed host cells. Useful selectable markers include dihydrofolate reductase or neomycin resistance for eukaryotic cell culture, or tetracycline or ampicillin resistance in E. coli. 
The vector may be introduced into the host cells using any of a variety of techniques, including transformation, transfection, transduction, viral infection, gene guns, or Ti-mediated gene transfer. Particular methods include calcium phosphate transfection, DEAE-Dextran mediated transfection, lipofection, or electroporation
Reductive Reassortment—In another aspect, variant nitrilase polynucleotides can be generated by the process of reductive reassortment. Whereas recombination is an “inter-molecular” process which, in bacteria, is generally viewed as a “recA-dependent” phenomenon, the process of “reductive reassortment” occurs by an “intra-molecular”, recA-independent process. In this aspect, the invention can rely on the ability of cells to mediate reductive processes to decrease the complexity of quasi-repeated sequences in the cell by deletion. The method involves the generation of constructs containing consecutive repeated or quasi-repeated sequences (original encoding sequences), the insertion of these sequences into an appropriate vector, and the subsequent introduction of the vector into an appropriate host cell. The reassortment of the individual molecular identities occurs by combinatorial processes between the consecutive sequences in the construct possessing regions of homology, or between quasi-repeated units. The reassortment process recombines and/or reduces the complexity and extent of the repeated sequences, and results in the production of novel molecular species. Various treatments may be applied to enhance the rate of reassortment, such as ultra-violet light or DNA damaging chemicals. In addition, host cell lines displaying enhanced levels of “genetic instability” can be used.
Repeated Sequences—Repeated or “quasi-repeated” sequences play a role in genetic instability. In the present invention, “quasi-repeats” are repeats that are not identical in structure but, rather, represent an array of consecutive sequences which have a high degree of similarity or identity sequences. The reductive reassortment or deletion process in the cell reduces the complexity of the resulting construct by deleting sequences between positions within quasi-repeated sequences. Because the deletion (and potentially insertion) events can occur virtually anywhere within the quasi-repetitive units, these sequences provide a large repertoire of potential variants.
When the quasi-repeated sequences are all ligated in the same orientation, for instance head-to-tail or vice versa, the endpoints of a deletion are, for the most part, equally likely to occur anywhere within the quasi-repeated sequences. In contrast, when the units are presented head-to-head or tail-to-tail, the inverted quasi-repeated sequences can form a duplex which delineates the endpoints of the adjacent units and thereby favors deletion of discrete units. Therefore, it is preferable in the present invention that the quasi-repeated sequences are joined in the same orientation because random orientation of quasi-repeated sequences will result in the loss of reassortment efficiency, while consistent orientation of the sequences will offer the highest efficiency. Nonetheless, although having fewer of the contiguous sequences in the same orientation decreases the efficiency or reductive reassortment, it may still provide sufficient variation for the effective recovery of novel molecules.
Sequences can be assembled in a head-to-tail orientation using any of a variety of methods, including the following:

    
    
        a) Primers can be utilized that include a poly-A head and poly-T tail which, when made single-stranded, would provide orientation. This is accomplished by having the first few bases of the primers made from RNA and hence easily removed by RNAse H.
        b) Primers can be utilized that include unique restriction cleavage sites. Multiple sites, a battery of unique sequences, and repeated synthesis and ligation steps would be required.
        c) The inner few bases of the primer can be thiolated and an exonuclease used to produce properly tailed molecules.
    
    


The recovery of the reassorted sequences relies on the identification of cloning vectors with a reduced repetitive index (RI). The reassorted coding sequences can then be recovered by amplification. The products are recloned and expressed. The recovery of cloning vectors with reduced RI can be effected by:

    
    
        1) The use of vectors only stably maintained when the construct is reduced in complexity.
        2) The physical recovery of shortened vectors by physical procedures. In this case, the cloning vector would be recovered using standard plasmid isolation procedures and then size-fractionated using standard procedures (e.g., agarose gel or column with a low molecular weight cut off).
        3) The recovery of vectors containing interrupted genes can be selected when insert size decreases.
        4) The use of direct selection techniques wherein an expression vector is used and the appropriate selection is carried out.
    
    


Coding sequences from related organisms may demonstrate a high degree of homology but nonetheless encode quite diverse protein products. These types of sequences are particularly useful in the present invention as quasi-repeats. However, while the examples illustrated below demonstrate the reassortment of coding sequences with a high degree of identity (quasi-repeats), this process is not limited to nearly identical repeats.
The following example demonstrates a method of the invention. Quasi-repetitive coding sequences derived from three different species are obtained. Each sequence encodes a protein with a distinct set of properties. Each of the sequences differs by one or more base pairs at unique positions in the sequences which are designated “A”, “B” and “C”. The quasi-repeated sequences are separately or collectively amplified and ligated into random assemblies such that all possible permutations and combinations are available in the population of ligated molecules. The number of quasi-repeat units can be controlled by the assembly conditions. The average number of quasi-repeated units in a construct is defined as the repetitive index (RI).
Once formed, the constructs can be size-fractionated on an agarose gel according to published protocols, inserted into a cloning vector, and transfected into an appropriate host cell. The cells can then be propagated to allow reductive reassortment to occur. The rate of the reductive reassortment process may be stimulated by the introduction of DNA damage if desired. Whether the reduction in RI is mediated by deletion formation between repeated sequences by an “intra-molecular” mechanism, or mediated by recombination-like events through “inter-molecular” mechanisms is immaterial. The end result is a reassortment of the molecules into all possible combinations.
In another aspect, prior to or during recombination or reassortment, polynucleotides of the invention or polynucleotides generated by the methods described herein can be subjected to agents or processes which promote the introduction of mutations into the original polynucleotides. The introduction of such mutations would increase the diversity of resulting hybrid polynucleotides and polypeptides encoded therefrom. The agents or processes which promote mutagenesis include, but are not limited to: (+)-CC-1065, or a synthetic analog such as (+)-CC-1065-(N-3-adenine) (Sun, et al. (1992), Biochemistry 31(10):2822-9); an N-acetylated or deacetylated 4′-fluoro-4-aminobiphenyl adduct capable of inhibiting DNA synthesis (see, for example, van de Poll, et al. (1992), Carcinogenesis 13(5):751-8); or a N-acetylated or deacetylated 4-aminobiphenyl adduct capable of inhibiting DNA synthesis (see also, Van de Poll, et al. (1992), supra); trivalent chromium, a trivalent chromium salt, a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (“PAH”) DNA adduct capable of inhibiting DNA replication, such as 7-bromomethyl-benz[a]anthracene (“BMA”), tris(2,3-dibromopropyl)phosphate (“Tris-BP”), 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (“DBCP”), 2-bromoacrolein (2BA), benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-dihydrodiol-9-10-epoxide (“BPDE”), a platinum(II) halogen salt, N-hydroxy-2-amino-3-methylimidazol-4,5-H-quinoline (“N-hydroxy-IQ”), and N-hydroxy-2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-f]-pyridine (“N-hydroxy-PhIP”). Especially preferred means for slowing or halting PCR amplification consist of UV light (+)-CC-1065 and (+)-CC-1065-(N3-Adenine). Particularly encompassed means are DNA adducts or polynucleotides comprising the DNA adducts from the polynucleotides or polynucleotides pool, which can be released or removed by a process including heating the solution comprising the polynucleotides prior to further processing.
GSSMTM—The invention also provides for the use of codon primers containing a degenerate N,N,G/T sequence to introduce point mutations into a polynucleotide, so as to generate a set of progeny polypeptides in which a full range of single amino acid substitutions is represented at each amino acid position, a method referred to as gene site-saturated mutagenesis (GSSMTM). The oligos used are comprised contiguously of a first homologous sequence, a degenerate N,N,G/T sequence, and possibly a second homologous sequence. The progeny translational products from the use of such oligos include all possible amino acid changes at each amino acid site along the polypeptide, because the degeneracy of the N,N,G/T sequence includes codons for all 20 amino acids.
In one aspect, one such degenerate oligo (comprising one degenerate N,N,G/T cassette) is used for subjecting each original codon in a parental polynucleotide template to a full range of codon substitutions. In another aspect, at least two degenerate N,N,G/T cassettes are used—either in the same oligo or not, for subjecting at least two original codons in a parental polynucleotide template to a full range of codon substitutions. Thus, more than one N,N,G/T sequence can be contained in one oligo to introduce amino acid mutations at more than one site. This plurality of N,N,G/T sequences can be directly contiguous, or separated by one or more additional nucleotide sequences. In another aspect, oligos serviceable for introducing additions and deletions can be used either alone or in combination with the codons containing an N,N,G/T sequence, to introduce any combination or permutation of amino acid additions, deletions, and/or substitutions.
In a particular exemplification, it is possible to simultaneously mutagenize two or more contiguous amino acid positions using an oligo that contains contiguous N,N,G/T triplets, i.e., a degenerate (N,N,G/T)n sequence.
In another aspect, the present invention provides for the use of degenerate cassettes having less degeneracy than the N,N,G/T sequence. For example, it may be desirable in some instances to use a degenerate triplet sequence comprised of only one N, where said N can be in the first second or third position of the triplet. Any other bases including any combinations and permutations thereof can be used in the remaining two positions of the triplet. Alternatively, it may be desirable in some instances to use a degenerate N,N,N triplet sequence, or an N,N, G/C triplet sequence.
It is appreciated, however, that the use of a degenerate triplet (such as N,N,G/T or an N,N, G/C triplet sequence) as disclosed in the instant invention is advantageous for several reasons. In one aspect, this invention provides a means to systematically and fairly easily generate the substitution of the full range of the 20 possible amino acids into each and every amino acid position in a polypeptide. Thus, for a 100 amino acid polypeptide, the invention provides a way to systematically and fairly easily generate 2000 distinct species (i.e., 20 possible amino acids per position times 100 amino acid positions). It is appreciated that there is provided, through the use of an oligo containing a degenerate N,N,G/T or an N,N, G/C triplet sequence, 32 individual sequences that code for the 20 possible amino acids. Thus, in a reaction vessel in which a parental polynucleotide sequence is subjected to saturation mutagenesis using one such oligo, there are generated 32 distinct progeny polynucleotides encoding 20 distinct polypeptides. In contrast, the use of a non-degenerate oligo in site-directed mutagenesis leads to only one progeny polypeptide product per reaction vessel.
This invention also provides for the use of nondegenerate oligonucleotides, which can optionally be used in combination with degenerate primers disclosed. It is appreciated that in some situations, it is advantageous to use nondegenerate oligos to generate specific point mutations in a working polynucleotide. This provides a means to generate specific silent point mutations, point mutations leading to corresponding amino acid changes, and point mutations that cause the generation of stop codons and the corresponding expression of polypeptide fragments.
Thus, in one embodiment, each saturation mutagenesis reaction vessel contains polynucleotides encoding at least 20 progeny polypeptide molecules such that all 20 amino acids are represented at the one specific amino acid position corresponding to the codon position mutagenized in the parental polynucleotide. The 32-fold degenerate progeny polypeptides generated from each saturation mutagenesis reaction vessel can be subjected to clonal amplification (e.g., cloned into a suitable E. coli host using an expression vector) and subjected to expression screening. When an individual progeny polypeptide is identified by screening to display a favorable change in property (when compared to the parental polypeptide), it can be sequenced to identify the correspondingly favorable amino acid substitution contained therein.
It is appreciated that upon mutagenizing each and every amino acid position in a parental polypeptide using saturation mutagenesis as disclosed herein, favorable amino acid changes may be identified at more than one amino acid position. One or more new progeny molecules can be generated that contain a combination of all or part of these favorable amino acid substitutions. For example, if 2 specific favorable amino acid changes are identified in each of 3 amino acid positions in a polypeptide, the permutations include 3 possibilities at each position (no change from the original amino acid, and each of two favorable changes) and 3 positions. Thus, there are 3×3×3 or 27 total possibilities, including 7 that were previously examined—6 single point mutations (i.e., 2 at each of three positions) and no change at any position.
In yet another aspect, site-saturation mutagenesis can be used together with shuffling, chimerization, recombination and other mutagenizing processes, along with screening. This invention provides for the use of any mutagenizing process(es), including saturation mutagenesis, in an iterative manner. In one exemplification, the iterative use of any mutagenizing process(es) is used in combination with screening.
Thus, in a non-limiting exemplification, polynucleotides and polypeptides of the invention can be derived by saturation mutagenesis in combination with additional mutagenization processes, such as process where two or more related polynucleotides are introduced into a suitable host cell such that a hybrid polynucleotide is generated by recombination and reductive reassortment.
In addition to performing mutagenesis along the entire sequence of a gene, mutagenesis can be used to replace each of any number of bases in a polynucleotide sequence, wherein the number of bases to be mutagenized can be each integer from about 15 to about 100,000. Thus, instead of mutagenizing every position along a molecule, one can subject every or a discrete number of bases (e.g., a subset totaling from about 15 to about 100,000) to mutagenesis. In one embodiment, a separate nucleotide is used for mutagenizing each position or group of positions along a polynucleotide sequence. A group of 3 positions to be mutagenized can be a codon. In one embodiment, the mutations are introduced using a mutagenic primer, containing a heterologous cassette, also referred to as a mutagenic cassette. For example, cassettes can have from about 1 to about 500 bases. Each nucleotide position in such heterologous cassettes can be N, A, C, G, T, A/C, A/G, A/T, C/G, C/T, G/T, C/G/T, A/G/T, A/C/T, A/C/G, or E, where E is any base that is not A, C, G, or T.
In a general sense, saturation mutagenesis comprises mutagenizing a complete set of mutagenic cassettes (for example, each cassette is about 1-500 bases in length) in a defined polynucleotide sequence to be mutagenized (for example, the sequence to be mutagenized is from about 15 to about 100,000 bases in length). Thus, a group of mutations (ranging from about 1 to about 100 mutations) is introduced into each cassette to be mutagenized. A grouping of mutations to be introduced into one cassette can be different or the same from a second grouping of mutations to be introduced into a second cassette during the application of one round of saturation mutagenesis. Such groupings are exemplified by deletions, additions, groupings of particular codons, and groupings of particular nucleotide cassettes.
Defined sequences to be mutagenized include a whole gene, pathway, cDNA, entire open reading frame (ORF), promoter, enhancer, repressor/transactivator, origin of replication, intron, operator, or any polynucleotide functional group. Generally, a “defined sequence” for this purpose may be any polynucleotide that a 15 base-polynucleotide sequence, and polynucleotide sequences of lengths between about 15 bases and about 15,000 bases (this invention specifically names every integer in between). Considerations in choosing groupings of codons include types of amino acids encoded by a degenerate mutagenic cassette.
In a particularly preferred exemplification a grouping of mutations that can be introduced into a mutagenic cassette, this invention specifically provides for degenerate codon substitutions (using degenerate oligos) that code for 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20 amino acids at each position, and a library of polypeptides encoded thereby.
One aspect of the invention is an isolated nucleic acid comprising one of the sequences of the Group A nucleic acid sequences, sequences substantially identical thereto, sequences complementary thereto, or a fragment comprising at least 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, or 500 consecutive bases of one of the sequences of the Group A nucleic acid sequences. The isolated nucleic acids may comprise DNA, including cDNA, genomic DNA, and synthetic DNA. The DNA may be double-stranded or single-stranded, and if single stranded may be the coding strand or non-coding (anti-sense) strand. Alternatively, the isolated nucleic acids may comprise RNA.
As discussed in more detail below, the isolated nucleic acid sequences of the invention may be used to prepare one of the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences, and sequences substantially identical thereto, or fragments comprising at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 75, 100, or 150 consecutive amino acids of one of the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences, and sequences substantially identical thereto.
Alternatively, the nucleic acid sequences of the invention may be mutagenized using conventional techniques, such as site directed mutagenesis, or other techniques familiar to those skilled in the art, to introduce silent changes into the polynucleotides of the Group A nucleic acid sequences, and sequences substantially identical thereto. As used herein, “silent changes” include, for example, changes which do not alter the amino acid sequence encoded by the polynucleotide. Such changes may be desirable in order to increase the level of the polypeptide produced by host cells containing a vector encoding the polypeptide by introducing codons or codon pairs which occur frequently in the host organism.
The invention also relates to polynucleotides which have nucleotide changes which result in amino acid substitutions, additions, deletions, fusions and truncations in the polypeptides of the invention (e.g., the Group B amino acid sequences). Such nucleotide changes may be introduced using techniques such as site-directed mutagenesis, random chemical mutagenesis, exonuclease III deletion, and other recombinant DNA techniques. Alternatively, such nucleotide changes may be naturally occurring allelic variants which are isolated by identifying nucleic acid sequences which specifically hybridize to probes comprising at least 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, or 500 consecutive bases of one of the sequences of the Group A nucleic acid sequences, and sequences substantially identical thereto (or the sequences complementary thereto) under conditions of high, moderate, or low stringency as provided herein.
Immobilized Enzyme Solid Supports
The enzymes, fragments thereof and nucleic acids which encode the enzymes and fragments can be affixed to a solid support. This is often economical and efficient in the use of the enzymes in industrial processes. For example, a consortium or cocktail of enzymes (or active fragments thereof), which are used in a specific chemical reaction, can be attached to a solid support and dunked into a process vat. The enzymatic reaction can occur. Then, the solid support can be taken out of the vat, along with the enzymes affixed thereto, for repeated use. In one embodiment of the invention, the isolated nucleic acid is affixed to a solid support. In another embodiment of the invention, the solid support is selected from the group of a gel, a resin, a polymer, a ceramic, a glass, a microelectrode and any combination thereof.
For example, solid supports useful in this invention include gels. Some examples of gels include sepharose, gelatin, glutaraldehyde, chitosan-treated glutaraldehyde, albumin-glutaraldehyde, chitosan-Xanthan, toyopearl gel (polymer gel), alginate, alginate-polylysine, carrageenan, agarose, glyoxyl agarose, magnetic agarose, dextran-agarose, poly(Carbamoyl Sulfonate) hydrogel, BSA-PEG hydrogel, phosphorylated polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), monoaminoethyl-N-aminoethyl (MANA), amino, or any combination thereof.
Another solid support useful in the present invention are resins or polymers. Some examples of resins or polymers include cellulose, acrylamide, nylon, rayon, polyester, anion-exchange resin, AMBERLITETM XAD-7, AMBERLITETM XAD-8, AMBERLITETM IRA-94, AMBERLITETM IRC-50, polyvinyl, polyacrylic, polymethacrylate, or any combination thereof. Another type of solid support useful in the present invention is ceramic. Some examples include non-porous ceramic, porous ceramic, SiO2, Al2O3. Another type of solid support useful in the present invention is glass. Some examples include non-porous glass, porous glass, aminopropyl glass or any combination thereof. Another type of solid support which can be used is a microelectrode. An example is a polyethyleneimine-coated magnetite. Graphitic particles can be used as a solid support. Another example of a solid support is a cell, such as a red blood cell.
Methods of Immobilization
There are many methods which would be known to one of skill in the art for immobilizing enzymes or fragments thereof, or nucleic acids, onto a solid support. Some examples of such methods include electrostatic droplet generation, electrochemical means, via adsorption, via covalent binding, via cross-linking, via a chemical reaction or process, via encapsulation, via entrapment, via calcium alginate, or via poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). Like methods are described in Methods in Enzymology, Immobilized Enzymes and Cells, Part C. 1987. Academic Press. Edited by S. P. Colowick and N. O. Kaplan. Volume 136; and Immobilization of Enzymes and Cells. 1997. Humana Press. Edited by G. F. Bickerstaff. Series: Methods in Biotechnology, Edited by J. M. Walker.
Probes—The isolated nucleic acids of the Group A nucleic acid sequences, sequences substantially identical thereto, complementary sequences, or a fragment comprising at least 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, or 500 consecutive bases of one of the foregoing sequences may also be used as probes to determine whether a biological sample, such as a soil sample, contains an organism having a nucleic acid sequence of the invention or an organism from which the nucleic acid was obtained. In such procedures, a biological sample potentially harboring the organism from which the nucleic acid was isolated is obtained and nucleic acids are obtained from the sample. The nucleic acids are contacted with the probe under conditions which permit the probe to specifically hybridize to any complementary sequences which are present therein.
Where necessary, conditions which permit the probe to specifically hybridize to complementary sequences may be determined by placing the probe in contact with complementary sequences from samples known to contain the complementary sequence as well as control sequences which do not contain the complementary sequence. Hybridization conditions, such as the salt concentration of the hybridization buffer, the formamide concentration of the hybridization buffer, or the hybridization temperature, can be varied to identify conditions which allow the probe to hybridize specifically to complementary nucleic acids. Stringent hybridization conditions are recited herein.
Hybridization may be detected by labeling the probe with a detectable agent such as a radioactive isotope, a fluorescent dye or an enzyme capable of catalyzing the formation of a detectable product. Many methods for using the labeled probes to detect the presence of complementary nucleic acids in a sample are familiar to those skilled in the art. These include Southern Blots, Northern Blots, colony hybridization procedures, and dot blots. Protocols for each of these procedures are provided in Ausubel, et al. (1997), Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., and Sambrook et al. (1989), Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 2d Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In one example, a probe DNA is “labeled” with one partner of a specific binding pair (i.e., a ligand) and the other partner of the pair is bound to a solid matrix to provide ease of separation of target from its source. For example, the ligand and specific binding partner can be selected from, in either orientation, the following: (1) an antigen or hapten and an antibody or specific binding fragment thereof; (2) biotin or iminobiotin and avidin or streptavidin; (3) a sugar and a lectin specific therefor; (4) an enzyme and an inhibitor therefor; (5) an apoenzyme and cofactor; (6) complementary homopolymeric oligonucleotides; and (7) a hormone and a receptor therefor. In one example, the solid phase is selected from: (1) a glass or polymeric surface; (2) a packed column of polymeric beads; and (3) magnetic or paramagnetic particles.
Alternatively, more than one probe (at least one of which is capable of specifically hybridizing to any complementary sequences which are present in the nucleic acid sample), may be used in an amplification reaction to determine whether the sample contains an organism containing a nucleic acid sequence of the invention (e.g., an organism from which the nucleic acid was isolated). Typically, the probes comprise oligonucleotides. In one embodiment, the amplification reaction may comprise a PCR reaction. PCR protocols are described in Ausubel, et al. (1997), supra, and Sambrook, et al. (1989), supra. Alternatively, the amplification may comprise a ligase chain reaction, 3SR, or strand displacement reaction. (See Barany (1991), PCR Methods and Applications 1:5-16; Fahy et al. (1991), PCR Methods and Applications 1:25-33; and Walker et al. (1992), Nucleic Acid Research 20:1691-1696, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties).
Probes derived from sequences near the ends of a sequence as set forth in the Group A nucleic acid sequences, and sequences substantially identical thereto, may also be used in chromosome walking procedures to identify clones containing genomic sequences located adjacent to the nucleic acid sequences as set forth above. Such methods allow the isolation of genes which encode additional proteins from the host organism.
An isolated nucleic acid sequence as set forth in the Group A nucleic acid sequences, sequences substantially identical thereto, sequences complementary thereto, or a fragment comprising at least 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, or 500 consecutive bases of one of the foregoing sequences may be used as probes to identify and isolate related nucleic acids. In some embodiments, the related nucleic acids may be cDNAs or genomic DNAs from organisms other than the one from which the nucleic acid was isolated. For example, the other organisms may be related organisms. In such procedures, a nucleic acid sample is contacted with the probe under conditions which permit the probe to specifically hybridize to related sequences. Hybridization of the probe to nucleic acids from the related organism is then detected using any of the methods described above.
In nucleic acid hybridization reactions, the conditions used to achieve a particular level of stringency will vary, depending on the nature of the nucleic acids being hybridized. For example, the length of the nucleic acids, the amount of complementarity between the nucleic acids, the nucleotide sequence composition (e.g., G-C rich v. A-T rich content), and the nucleic acid type (e.g., RNA v. DNA) can be considered in selecting hybridization conditions. Stringency may be varied by conducting the hybridization at varying temperatures below the melting temperatures of the probes. The melting temperature, Tm, is the temperature (under defined ionic strength and pH) at which 50% of the target sequence hybridizes to a perfectly complementary probe. Stringent conditions are selected to be equal to or about 5° C. lower than the Tm for a particular probe. The melting temperature of the probe may be calculated using the following formulas:
For probes between 14 and 70 nucleotides in length the melting temperature (Tm) is calculated using the formula:

Tm=81.5+16.6(log [Na+])+0.41(fraction G+C)−(600/N)

    
    
        where N is the length of the probe.
    
    


If the hybridization is carried out in a solution containing formamide, the melting temperature may be calculated using the equation:

Tm=81.5+16.6(log [Na+])+0.41(fraction G+C)−(0.63% formamide)−(600/N)

    
    
        where N is the length of the probe.
    
    


Expression Libraries—Expression libraries can be created using the polynucleotides of the invention in combination with expression vectors and appropriate host cells. The library allows for the in vivo expression of the polypeptides which are encoded by the polynucleotides of the invention. After such expression libraries have been generated one can include the additional step of “biopanning” such libraries prior to screening by cell sorting. The “biopanning” procedure refers to a process for identifying clones having a specified biological activity by screening for sequence identity in a library of clones prepared by (i) selectively isolating target DNA derived from at least one microorganism by use of at least one probe DNA comprising at least a portion of a DNA sequence encoding a polypeptide having a specified biological activity (e.g., nitrilase activity); and (ii) optionally transforming a host with the isolated target DNA to produce a library of clones which are screened for the specified biological activity.
The probe DNA used for selectively isolating the target DNA of interest from the DNA derived from at least one microorganism can be a full-length coding region sequence or a partial coding region sequence of DNA for an enzyme of known activity. The original DNA library can be probed using mixtures of probes comprising at least a portion of DNA sequences encoding enzymes having the specified enzyme activity. These probes or probe libraries are single-stranded and the microbial DNA which is probed has been converted into single-stranded form. The probes that are particularly suitable are those derived from DNA encoding enzymes having an activity similar or identical to the specified enzyme activity that is to be screened.
Having prepared a multiplicity of clones from DNA selectively isolated from an organism, such clones are screened for a specific enzyme activity and to identify the clones having the specified enzyme characteristics.
The screening for enzyme activity may be affected on individual expression clones or may be initially affected on a mixture of expression clones to ascertain whether or not the mixture has one or more specified enzyme activities. If the mixture has a specified enzyme activity, then the individual clones may be rescreened for such enzyme activity or for a more specific activity. Thus, for example, if a clone mixture has nitrilase activity, then the individual clones may be recovered and screened to determine which of such clones has nitrilase activity.
As described with respect to one of the above aspects, the invention provides a process for enzyme activity screening of clones containing selected DNA derived from a microorganism which process includes: screening a library for specified enzyme activity, said library including a plurality of clones, said clones having been prepared by recovering from genomic DNA of a microorganism selected DNA, which DNA is selected by hybridization to at least one DNA sequence which is all or a portion of a DNA sequence encoding an enzyme having the specified activity; and transforming a host with the selected DNA to produce clones which are screened for the specified enzyme activity.
In one embodiment, a DNA library derived from a microorganism is subjected to a selection procedure to select therefrom DNA which hybridizes to one or more probe DNA sequences which is all or a portion of a DNA sequence encoding an enzyme having the specified enzyme activity by:

    
    
        (a) contacting the single-stranded DNA population from the DNA library with the DNA probe bound to a ligand under stringent hybridization conditions so as to produce a duplex between the probe and a member of the DNA library;
        (b) contacting the duplex with a solid phase specific binding partner for the ligand so as to produce a solid phase complex;
        (c) separating the solid phase complex from the non-duplexed members of the DNA library;
        (d) denaturing the duplex to release the member of the DNA library;
        (e) creating a complementary DNA strand of the member from step (d) so as to make the member a double-stranded DNA;
        (f) introducing the double-stranded DNA into a suitable host so as to express a polypeptide which is encoded by the member DNA; and
        (g) determining whether the polypeptide expressed exhibits the specified enzymatic activity.
    
    


In another aspect, the process includes a preselection to recover DNA including signal or secretion sequences. In this manner it is possible to select from the genomic DNA population by hybridization as hereinabove described only DNA which includes a signal or secretion sequence. The following paragraphs describe the protocol for this embodiment of the invention, the nature and function of secretion signal sequences in general and a specific exemplary application of such sequences to an assay or selection process.
A particularly embodiment of this aspect further comprises, after (a) but before (b) above, the steps of:

    
    
        (i) contacting the single-stranded DNA population of (a) with a ligand-bound oligonucleotide probe that is complementary to a secretion signal sequence unique to a given class of proteins under hybridization conditions to form a double-stranded DNA duplex;
        (ii) contacting the duplex of (i) with a solid phase specific binding partner for said ligand so as to produce a solid phase complex;
        (iii) separating the solid phase complex from the single-stranded DNA population of (a);
        (iv) denaturing the duplex so as to release single-stranded DNA members of the genomic population; and
        (v) separating the single-stranded DNA members from the solid phase bound probe.
    
    


The DNA which has been selected and isolated to include a signal sequence is then subjected to the selection procedure hereinabove described to select and isolate therefrom DNA which binds to one or more probe DNA sequences derived from DNA encoding an enzyme(s) having the specified enzyme activity. This procedure is described and exemplified in U.S. Pat. No. 6,054,267, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
In vivo biopanning may be performed utilizing a (fluorescence activated cell sorter) FACS-based machine. Complex gene libraries are constructed with vectors which contain elements which stabilize transcribed RNA. For example, the inclusion of sequences which result in secondary structures such as hairpins which are designed to flank the transcribed regions of the RNA would serve to enhance their stability, thus increasing their half life within the cell. The probe molecules used in the biopanning process consist of oligonucleotides labeled with reporter molecules that only fluoresce upon binding of the probe to a target molecule. These probes are introduced into the recombinant cells from the library using one of several transformation methods. The probe molecules bind to the transcribed target mRNA resulting in DNA/RNA heteroduplex molecules. Binding of the probe to a target will yield a fluorescent signal that is detected and sorted by the FACS machine during the screening process.
In some embodiments, the nucleic acid encoding one of the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences, sequences substantially identical thereto, or fragments comprising at least about 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 75, 100, or 150 consecutive amino acids thereof is assembled in appropriate phase with a leader sequence capable of directing secretion of the translated polypeptide or fragment thereof. Optionally, the nucleic acid can encode a fusion polypeptide in which one of the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences, sequences substantially identical thereto, or fragments comprising at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 75, 100, or 150 consecutive amino acids thereof is fused to heterologous peptides or polypeptides, such as N-terminal identification peptides which impart desired characteristics, such as increased stability or simplified purification.
The host cell may be any of the host cells familiar to those skilled in the art, including prokaryotic cells, eukaryotic cells, mammalian cells, insect cells, or plant cells. As representative examples of appropriate hosts, there may be mentioned: bacterial cells, such as E. coli, Streptomyces, Bacillus subtilis, Salmonella typhimurium and various species within the genera Pseudomonas, Streptomyces, and Staphylococcus, fungal cells, such as yeast, insect cells such as Drosophila S2 and Spodoptera Sf9, animal cells such as CHO, COS or Bowes melanoma, and adenoviruses. The selection of an appropriate host is within the abilities of those skilled in the art.
Where appropriate, the engineered host cells can be cultured in conventional nutrient media modified as appropriate for activating promoters, selecting transformants or amplifying the genes of the invention. Following transformation of a suitable host strain and growth of the host strain to an appropriate cell density, the selected promoter may be induced by appropriate means (e.g., temperature shift or chemical induction) and the cells may be cultured for an additional period to allow them to produce the desired polypeptide or fragment thereof.
Cells are typically harvested by centrifugation, disrupted by physical or chemical means, and the resulting crude extract is retained for further purification. Microbial cells employed for expression of proteins can be disrupted by any convenient method, including freeze-thaw cycling, sonication, mechanical disruption, or use of cell lysing agents. Such methods are well known to those skilled in the art. The expressed polypeptide or fragment thereof can be recovered and purified from recombinant cell cultures by methods including ammonium sulfate or ethanol precipitation, acid extraction, anion or cation exchange chromatography, phosphocellulose chromatography, hydrophobic interaction chromatography, affinity chromatography, hydroxylapatite chromatography and lectin chromatography. Protein refolding steps can be used, as necessary, in completing configuration of the polypeptide. If desired, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) can be employed for final purification steps.
Various mammalian cell culture systems can also be employed to express recombinant protein. Examples of mammalian expression systems include the COS-7 lines of monkey kidney fibroblasts (described by Gluzman (1981), Cell 23:175,), and other cell lines capable of expressing proteins from a compatible vector, such as the C127, 3T3, CHO, HeLa and BHK cell lines.
The invention also relates to variants of the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences, sequences substantially identical thereto, or fragments comprising at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 75, 100, or 150 consecutive amino acids thereof. In particular, the variants may differ in amino acid sequence from the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences, and sequences substantially identical thereto, by one or more substitutions, additions, deletions, fusions and truncations, which may be present in any combination.
The variants may be naturally occurring or created in vitro. In particular, such variants may be created using genetic engineering techniques such as site directed mutagenesis, random chemical mutagenesis, Exonuclease III deletion procedures, and standard cloning techniques. Alternatively, such variants, fragments, analogs, or derivatives may be created using chemical synthesis or modification procedures.
Other methods of making variants are also familiar to those skilled in the art. These include procedures in which nucleic acid sequences obtained from natural isolates are modified to generate nucleic acids which encode polypeptides having characteristics which enhance their value in industrial or laboratory applications. In such procedures, a large number of variant sequences having one or more nucleotide differences with respect to the sequence obtained from the natural isolate are generated and characterized. Typically, these nucleotide differences result in amino acid changes with respect to the polypeptides encoded by the nucleic acids from the natural isolates.
Error Prone PCR
For example, variants may be created using error prone PCR. In error prone PCR, PCR is performed under conditions where the copying fidelity of the DNA polymerase is low, such that a high rate of point mutations is obtained along the entire length of the PCR product. Error prone PCR is described in Leung, et al. (1989), Technique 1:11-15 and Caldwell, et al. (1992), PCR Methods Applic. 2:28-33, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Briefly, in such procedures, nucleic acids to be mutagenized are mixed with PCR primers and reagents (e.g., reaction buffer, MgCl2, MnCl2, Taq polymerase and an appropriate concentration of dNTPs) for achieving a high rate of point mutation along the entire length of the PCR product. For example, the reaction may be performed using 20 fmoles of nucleic acid to be mutagenized, 30 pmoles of each PCR primer, a reaction buffer comprising 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.3) and 0.01% gelatin, 7 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM MnCl2, 5 units of Taq polymerase, 0.2 mM dGTP, 0.2 mM dATP, 1 mM dCTP, and 1 mM dTTP. PCR may be performed for 30 cycles of 94° C. for 1 min, 45° C. for 1 min, and 72° C. for 1 min. However, it will be appreciated that these parameters may be varied as appropriate. The mutagenized nucleic acids are cloned into an appropriate vector and the activities of the polypeptides encoded by the mutagenized nucleic acids are evaluated.
Variants also may be created using oligonucleotide directed mutagenesis to generate site-specific mutations in any cloned DNA of interest. Oligonucleotide mutagenesis is described in Reidhaar-Olson, et al. (1988), Science, 241:53-57, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Briefly, in such procedures a plurality of double stranded oligonucleotides bearing one or more mutations to be introduced into the cloned DNA are synthesized and inserted into the cloned DNA to be mutagenized. Clones containing the mutagenized DNA are recovered and the activities of the polypeptides they encode are assessed.
Assembly PCR
Another method for generating variants is assembly PCR. Assembly PCR involves the assembly of a PCR product from a mixture of small DNA fragments. A large number of different PCR reactions occur in parallel in the same vial, with the products of one reaction priming the products of another reaction. Assembly PCR is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,965,408, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Sexual PCR Mutagenesis
Still another method of generating variants is sexual PCR mutagenesis. In sexual PCR mutagenesis, forced homologous recombination occurs between DNA molecules of different but highly related DNA sequence in vitro, as a result of random fragmentation of the DNA molecule based on sequence homology, followed by fixation of the crossover by primer extension in a PCR reaction. Sexual PCR mutagenesis is described in Stemmer (1994), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:10747-10751, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Briefly, in such procedures a plurality of nucleic acids to be recombined are digested with DNAse to generate fragments having an average size of about 50-200 nucleotides. Fragments of the desired average size are purified and resuspended in a PCR mixture. PCR is conducted under conditions which facilitate recombination between the nucleic acid fragments. For example, PCR may be performed by resuspending the purified fragments at a concentration of 10-30 ng/:l in a solution of 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 2.2 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris HCl, pH 9.0, and 0.1% Triton X-100. 2.5 Units of Taq polymerase per 100:1 of reaction mixture is added and PCR is performed using the following regime: 94° C. for 60 seconds, 94° C. for 30 seconds, 50-55° C. for 30 seconds, 72° C. for 30 seconds (30-45 times) and 72° C. for 5 minutes. However, it will be appreciated that these parameters may be varied as appropriate. In some embodiments, oligonucleotides may be included in the PCR reactions. In other embodiments, the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I may be used in a first set of PCR reactions and Taq polymerase may be used in a subsequent set of PCR reactions. Recombinant sequences are isolated and the activities of the polypeptides they encode are assessed.
In vivo Mutagenesis
Variants may also be created by in vivo mutagenesis. In some embodiments, random mutations in a sequence of interest are generated by propagating the sequence of interest in a bacterial strain, such as an E. coli strain, which carries mutations in one or more of the DNA repair pathways. Such “mutator” strains have a higher random mutation rate than that of a wild-type parent. Propagating the DNA in one of these strains will eventually generate random mutations within the DNA. Mutator strains suitable for use for in vivo mutagenesis are described in PCT Publication No. WO 91/16427 the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Cassette Mutagenesis
Variants may also be generated using cassette mutagenesis. In cassette mutagenesis a small region of a double stranded DNA molecule is replaced with a synthetic oligonucleotide “cassette” that differs from the native sequence. The oligonucleotide often contains completely and/or partially randomized native sequence.
Recursive Ensemble Mutagenesis
Recursive ensemble mutagenesis may also be used to generate variants. Recursive ensemble mutagenesis is an algorithm for protein engineering (protein mutagenesis) developed to produce diverse populations of phenotypically related mutants whose members differ in amino acid sequence. This method uses a feedback mechanism to control successive rounds of combinatorial cassette mutagenesis. Recursive ensemble mutagenesis is described in Arkin, et al. (1992), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89:7811-7815, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Exponential Ensemble Mutagenesis
In some embodiments, variants are created using exponential ensemble mutagenesis.
Exponential ensemble mutagenesis is a process for generating combinatorial libraries with a high percentage of unique and functional mutants, wherein small groups of residues are randomized in parallel to identify, at each altered position, amino acids which lead to functional proteins. Exponential ensemble mutagenesis is described in Delegrave, et al. (1993), Biotechnology Research 11:1548-1552, the disclosure of which incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Random and Site-directed Mutagenesis
Random and site-directed mutagenesis is described in Arnold (1993), Current Opinions in Biotechnology 4:450-455, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Shuffling Procedures
In some embodiments, the variants are created using shuffling procedures wherein portions of a plurality of nucleic acids which encode distinct polypeptides are fused together to create chimeric nucleic acid sequences which encode chimeric polypeptides as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,965,408 and 5,939,250, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
The variants of the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences may be variants in which one or more of the amino acid residues of the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences are substituted with a conserved or non-conserved amino acid residue (e.g., a conserved amino acid residue) and such substituted amino acid residue may or may not be one encoded by the genetic code.
Conservative substitutions are those that substitute a given amino acid in a polypeptide by another amino acid of like characteristics. Typically seen as conservative substitutions are the following replacements: replacements of an aliphatic amino acid such as Alanine, Valine, Leucine and Isoleucine with another aliphatic amino acid; replacement of a Serine with a Threonine or vice versa; replacement of an acidic residue such as Aspartic acid and Glutamic acid with another acidic residue; replacement of a residue bearing an amide group, such as Asparagine and Glutamine, with another residue bearing an amide group; exchange of a basic residue such as Lysine and Arginine with another basic residue; and replacement of an aromatic residue such as Phenylalanine, Tyrosine with another aromatic residue.
Other variants are those in which one or more of the amino acid residues of the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences includes a substituent group.
Still other variants are those in which the polypeptide is associated with another compound, such as a compound to increase the half-life of the polypeptide (for example, polyethylene glycol).
Additional variants are those in which additional amino acids are fused to the polypeptide, such as a leader sequence, a secretory sequence, a proprotein sequence or a sequence which facilitates purification, enrichment, or stabilization of the polypeptide.
In some embodiments, the fragments, derivatives and analogs retain the same biological function or activity as the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences, and sequences substantially identical thereto. In other embodiments, the fragment, derivative, or analog includes a proprotein, such that the fragment, derivative, or analog can be activated by cleavage of the proprotein portion to produce an active polypeptide.
Another aspect of the invention is polypeptides or fragments thereof which have at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, or more than about 95% homology to one of the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences, sequences substantially identical thereto, or a fragment comprising at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 75, 100, or 150 consecutive amino acids thereof. Percent identity may be determined using any of the programs described above which aligns the polypeptides or fragments being compared and determines the extent of amino acid homology or similarity between them. It will be appreciated that amino acid “homology” includes conservative amino acid substitutions such as those described above. In one embodiment of the invention, the fragments can be used to generate antibodies. These antibodies can be used to immobilize nitrilases can be used in industrial processes. Polynucleotides encoding the nitrilases of the present invention can be used in a similar way.
Alternatively, the homologous polypeptides or fragments may be obtained through biochemical enrichment or purification procedures. The sequence of potentially homologous polypeptides or fragments may be determined by proteolytic digestion, gel electrophoresis and/or microsequencing. The sequence of the prospective homologous polypeptide or fragment can be compared to one of the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences, sequences substantially identical thereto, or a fragment comprising at least about 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 75, 100, or 150 consecutive amino acids thereof using any of the programs described herein.
Another aspect of the invention is an assay for identifying fragments or variants of the Group B amino acid sequences, or sequences substantially identical thereto, which retain the enzymatic function of the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences, and sequences substantially identical thereto. For example, the fragments or variants of the polypeptides, may be used to catalyze biochemical reactions, which indicate that said fragment or variant retains the enzymatic activity of the polypeptides in Group B amino acid sequences.
The assay for determining if fragments of variants retain the enzymatic activity of the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences, and sequences substantially identical thereto includes the steps of: contacting the polypeptide fragment or variant with a substrate molecule under conditions which allow the polypeptide fragment or variant to function, and detecting either a decrease in the level of substrate or an increase in the level of the specific reaction product of the reaction between the polypeptide and substrate.
The polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences, sequences substantially identical thereto or fragments comprising at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 75, 100, or 150 consecutive amino acids thereof may be used in a variety of applications. For example, the polypeptides or fragments thereof may be used to catalyze biochemical reactions. In accordance with one aspect of the invention, there is provided a process for utilizing a polypeptide of the Group B amino acid sequences, and sequences substantially identical thereto or polynucleotides encoding such polypeptides for hydrolyzing aminonitriles. In such procedures, a substance containing a haloalkane compound is contacted with one of the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences, and sequences substantially identical thereto under conditions which facilitate the hydrolysis of the compound.
Antibodies—The polypeptides of Group B amino acid sequences, sequences substantially identical thereto or fragments comprising at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 75, 100, or 150 consecutive amino acids thereof, may also be used to generate antibodies which bind specifically to the enzyme polypeptides or fragments. The resulting antibodies may be used in immunoaffinity chromatography procedures to isolate or purify the polypeptide or to determine whether the polypeptide is present in a biological sample. In such procedures, a protein preparation, such as an extract, or a biological sample is contacted with an antibody capable of specifically binding to one of the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences, sequences substantially identical thereto, or fragments of the foregoing sequences.
In immunoaffinity procedures, the antibody is attached to a solid support, such as a bead or column matrix. The protein preparation is placed in contact with the antibody under conditions under which the antibody specifically binds to one of the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences, sequences substantially identical thereto, or fragments thereof. After a wash to remove non-specifically bound proteins, the specifically bound polypeptides are eluted.
The ability of proteins in a biological sample to bind to the antibody may be determined using any of a variety of procedures familiar to those skilled in the art. For example, binding may be determined by labeling the antibody with a detectable label such as a fluorescent agent, an enzymatic label, or a radioisotope. Alternatively, binding of the antibody to the sample may be detected using a secondary antibody having such a detectable label thereon. Particular assays include ELISA assays, sandwich assays, radioimmunoassays, and Western Blots.
The antibodies of the invention can be attached to solid supports and used to immobilize nitrilases of the present invention. Such immobilized nitrilases can be used, as described above, in industrial chemical processes for the conversion of nitriles to a wide range of useful products and intermediates.
Polyclonal antibodies generated against the polypeptides of the Group B amino acid sequences, and sequences substantially identical thereto, or fragments comprising at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 75, 100, or 150 consecutive amino acids thereof can be obtained by direct injection of the polypeptides into an animal or by administering the polypeptides to an animal. The antibody so obtained will then bind the polypeptide itself. In this manner, even a sequence encoding only a fragment of the polypeptide can be used to generate antibodies which may bind to the whole native polypeptide. Such antibodies can then be used to isolate the polypeptide from cells expressing that polypeptide.
For preparation of monoclonal antibodies, any technique which provides antibodies produced by continuous cell line cultures can be used. Examples include the hybridoma technique (Kohler and Milstein (1975), Nature, 256:495-497, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference), the trioma technique, the human B-cell hybridoma technique (Kozbor, et al. (1983), Immunology Today 4:72, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference), and the EBV-hybridoma technique (Cole, et al. (1985), in Monoclonal Antibodies and Cancer Therapy, Alan R. Liss, Inc., pp. 77-96, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety).
Techniques described for the production of single chain antibodies (U.S. Pat. No. 4,946,778, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) can be adapted to produce single chain antibodies to the polypeptides of, for example, the Group B amino acid sequences, or fragments thereof. Alternatively, transgenic mice may be used to express humanized antibodies to these polypeptides or fragments.
Antibodies generated against a polypeptide of the Group B amino acid sequences, sequences substantially identical thereto, or fragments comprising at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 75, 100, or 150 consecutive amino acids thereof may be used in screening for similar polypeptides from other organisms and samples. In such techniques, polypeptides from the organism are contacted with the antibody and those polypeptides which specifically bind to the antibody are detected. Any of the procedures described above may be used to detect antibody binding. One such screening assay is described in “Methods for Measuring Cellulase Activities”, Methods in Enzymology, 160:87-116, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Use of Whole Cells Comprising a Nucleic Acid
The invention provides for the use of whole cells which have been transformed with nucleic acid (or an active fragment thereof) encoding one or more of the nitrilases of the invention. The invention also provides for the use of such a whole cell in performing a nitrilase reaction on a substrate. Therefore, this invention provides for methods of hydrolyzing a cyanohydrin or aminonitrile linkage using a whole cell comprising at least one nucleic acid or polypeptide disclosed herein (SEQ ID NOS:1-386). For example, a whole cell which is stably transfected (the invention also encompasses transiently transfected or transformed whole cells) with a nucleic acid encoding a nitrilase is an embodiment of the invention. Such a cell is useful as a reagent in a reaction mixture to act on a substrate and exhibit nitrilase activity.
Sequence Analysis Software
Percent identity or homology between two or more sequences is typically measured using sequence analysis software (e.g., Sequence Analysis Software Package of the Genetics Computer Group, University of Wisconsin Biotechnology Center, Madison, Wis.). Such software matches similar sequences by assigning a percent identity or homology to various deletions, substitutions and other modifications. The term “percent identity,” in the context of two or more nucleic acids or polypeptide sequences, refers to the percentage of nucleotides or amino acid residues that are the same when compared after being aligned for maximum correspondence over a designated region or comparison “window.” Under some algorithms, a conservative amino acid substitution can be considered “identical” and a change at a wobble site of a codon can be considered “identical.”
“Alignment” refers to the process of lining up two or more sequences to achieve maximal correspondence for the purpose of assessing the degree of identity or homology, as defined within the context of the relevant alignment algorithm.
For sequence comparison, typically one sequence acts as a reference sequence, to which test sequences are compared. When using a sequence comparison algorithm, test and reference sequences are entered into a computer, subsequence coordinates are designated, if necessary, and sequence algorithm program parameters are designated for a particular algorithm. Default program parameters can be used, or alternative parameters can be designated. The sequence comparison algorithm then calculates the percent identity or homology for the test sequences relative to the reference sequence, based on the program parameters.
A “comparison window”, as used herein, is a segment of the contiguous positions in a nucleic acid or an amino acid sequence consisting of from 20 to 600, usually about 50 to about 200, more usually about 100 to about 150 nucleotides or residues, which may be compared to a reference sequence of the same or different number of contiguous positions after the two sequences are optimally aligned. Methods of alignment of sequences for comparison are well-known in the art. Optimal alignment of sequences for comparison can be conducted, e.g., by the local homology algorithm of Smith and Waterman (1981), Adv. Appl. Math. 2:482, by the homology alignment algorithm of Needleman and Wunsch (1970), J. Mol. Biol. 48:443, by the search for similarity method of Pearson and Lipman (1988), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:2444-2448, by computerized implementations of these algorithms, or by manual alignment and visual inspection. Other algorithms for determining homology or identity include, for example, the BLAST program (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool, National Center for Biological Information), BESTFIT, FASTA, and TFASTA (Wisconsin Genetics Software Package, Genetics Computer Group, Madison, Wis.), ALIGN, AMAS (Analysis of Multiply Aligned Sequences), AMPS (Alignment of Multiple Protein Sequence), ASSET (Aligned Segment Statistical Evaluation Tool), BANDS, BESTSCOR, BIOSCAN (Biological Sequence Comparative Analysis Node), BLIMPS (BLocks IMProved Searcher), Intervals and Points, BMB, CLUSTAL V, CLUSTAL W, CONSENSUS, LCONSENSUS, WCONSENSUS, Smith-Waterman algorithm, DARWIN, Las Vegas algorithm, FNAT (Forced Nucleotide Alignment Tool), Framealign, Framesearch, DYNAMIC, FILTER, FSAP (Fristensky Sequence Analysis Package), GAP (Global Alignment Program), GENAL, GIBBS, GenQuest, ISSC (Sensitive Sequence Comparison), LALIGN (Local Sequence Alignment), LCP (Local Content Program), MACAW (Multiple Alignment Construction and Analysis Workbench), MAP (Multiple Alignment Program), MBLKP, MBLKN, PIMA (Pattern-Induced Multi-sequence Alignment), SAGA (Sequence Alignment by Genetic Algorithm) and WHAT-IF. Such alignment programs can also be used to screen genome databases to identify polynucleotide sequences having substantially identical sequences. A number of genome databases are available, for example, a substantial portion of the human genome is available as part of the Human Genome Sequencing Project. At least twenty-one other genomes have already been sequenced, including, for example, M. genitalium (Fraser, et al., 1995), M. jannaschii (Butt, et al., 1996), H. influenzae (Fleischmann, et al., 1995), E. coli (Blattner, et al., 1997), and yeast (S. cerevisiae) (Mewes, et al., 1997), and D. melanogaster (Adams, et al., 2000). Significant progress has also been made in sequencing the genomes of model organism, such as mouse, C. elegans, and Arabadopsis sp. Several databases containing genomic information annotated with some functional information are maintained by different organizations, and are accessible via the internet.
Examples of useful algorithms are the BLAST and the BLAST 2.0 algorithms, which are described in Altschul, et al. (1977), Nuc. Acids Res. 25:3389-3402, and Altschul, et al. (1990), J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410, respectively. Software for performing BLAST analyses is publicly available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information. This algorithm involves first identifying high scoring sequence pairs (HSPs) by identifying short words of length W in the query sequence, which either match or satisfy some positive-valued threshold score T when aligned with a word of the same length in a database sequence. T is referred to as the neighborhood word score threshold (Altschul, et al., supra). These initial neighborhood word hits act as seeds for initiating searches to find longer HSPs containing them. The word hits are extended in both directions along each sequence for as far as the cumulative alignment score can be increased. Cumulative scores are calculated using the parameter M (reward score for a pair of matching residues; always >0). For amino acid sequences, a scoring matrix is used to calculate the cumulative score. Extension of the word hits in each direction are halted when: the cumulative alignment score falls off by the quantity X from its maximum achieved value; the cumulative score goes to zero or below, due to the accumulation of one or more negative-scoring residue alignments; or the end of either sequence is reached. The BLAST algorithm parameters W, T, and X determine the sensitivity and speed of the alignment. For nucleotide sequences, the BLASTN program uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 11, an expectation (E) of 10, M=5, N=−4 and a comparison of both strands. For amino acid sequences, the BLASTP program uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 3, an expectation (E) of 10, and the BLOSUM62 scoring matrix (see Henikoff and Henikoff (1989), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:10915).
The BLAST algorithm also performs a statistical analysis of the similarity between two sequences (see, e.g., Karlin and Altschul (1993), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:5873). One measure of similarity provided by BLAST algorithm is the smallest sum probability (P(N)), which provides an indication of the probability by which a match between two nucleotide or amino acid sequences would occur by chance. For example, a nucleic acid is considered similar to a references sequence if the smallest sum probability in a comparison of the test nucleic acid to the reference nucleic acid is less than about 0.2, less than about 0.01, or less than about 0.001.
In one embodiment, protein and nucleic acid sequence homologies are evaluated using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (“BLAST”). In particular, five specific BLAST programs are used to perform the following task:

    
    
        (1) BLASTP and BLAST3 compare an amino acid query sequence against a protein sequence database;
        (2) BLASTN compares a nucleotide query sequence against a nucleotide sequence database;
        (3) BLASTX compares the six-frame conceptual translation products of a query nucleotide sequence (both strands) against a protein sequence database;
        (4) TBLASTN compares a query protein sequence against a nucleotide sequence database translated in all six reading frames (both strands); and
        (5) TBLASTX compares the six-frame translations of a nucleotide query sequence against the six-frame translations of a nucleotide sequence database.
    
    


The BLAST programs identify homologous sequences by identifying similar segments, which are referred to herein as “high-scoring segment pairs,” between a query amino or nucleic acid sequence and a test sequence which may be obtained from a protein or nucleic acid sequence database. High-scoring segment pairs are identified (i.e., aligned) by means of a scoring matrix, many of which are known in the art. In one example, the scoring matrix used is the BLOSUM62 matrix (Gonnet, et al. (1992), Science 256:1443-1445; Henikoff and Henikoff (1993), Proteins 17:49-61). In another example, the PAM or PAM250 matrices may also be used (see, e.g., Schwartz and Dayhoff, eds. (1978), Matrices for Detecting Distance Relationships: Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, Washington: National Biomedical Research Foundation). BLAST programs are accessible through the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
The parameters used with the above algorithms may be adapted depending on the sequence length and degree of homology studied. In some embodiments, the parameters may be the default parameters used by the algorithms in the absence of instructions from the user.
In a particular embodiment, the invention provides a method for modifying small molecules, comprising contacting a polypeptide encoded by a polynucleotide described herein or enzymatically active fragments thereof with a small molecule to produce a modified small molecule. A library of modified small molecules is tested to determine if a modified small molecule is present within the library which exhibits a desired activity. A specific biocatalytic reaction which produces the modified small molecule of desired activity is identified by systematically eliminating each of the biocatalytic reactions used to produce a portion of the library, and then testing the small molecules produced in the portion of the library for the presence or absence of the modified small molecule with the desired activity. The specific biocatalytic reactions, which produce the modified small molecule of, desired activity is optionally repeated. The biocatalytic reactions are conducted with a group of biocatalysts that react with distinct structural moieties found within the structure of a small molecule, each biocatalyst is specific for one structural moiety or a group of related structural moieties; and each biocatalyst reacts with many different small molecules which contain the distinct structural moiety.
Some embodiments of the use of the nitrilases are:
α-hydroxy acid—Nitrilases produce α-hydroxy acids through hydrolysis of cyanohydrins. Production of mandelic acid and derivatives thereof is an example of this. A significant application of this type involves commercial production of (R)-mandelic acid in both high yield and high enantioselectivity from mandelonitrile. Mandelic acid and derivatives have found broad application as intermediates and resolving agents for the production of many chiral pharmaceutical and agricultural products. Previous attempts to employ the few known nitrilases in processes using analogous substrates have been plagued by significantly lower activity, productivity, and selectivity.




Phenyllactic Acid Derivatives
An additional application is in the production of (S)-phenyl lactic acid derivatives in both high yield and high enantioselectivity. Phenyl lactic acid derivatives have found broad application in the production of many chiral pharmaceutical and agricultural products.




β-hydroxy Acid
With important commercial considerations, nitrilases are provided produce either enantiomer of 4-cyano-3-hydroxybutyric acid, the (R)-enantiomer of which is a key intermediate in the synthesis of the blockbuster drug LIPITORTM.




The following nitrilases are more examples of nitrilases useful in converting hydroxyglutarylnitrile to (R)-3-hydroxy-4-cyano-butyric acid: SEQ ID NOS:205, 206, SEQ ID NOS:207, 208, SEQ ID NOS:195, 196, SEQ ID NOS:43, 44, SEQ ID NOS:321, 322, and SEQ ID NOS:237, 238. The above schematic indicates that “selected nitrilases” can be used to convert hydroxyglutarylnitrile to (S)-3-hydroxy-4-cyano-butyric acid: SEQ ID NOS:107, 108, SEQ ID NOS:109, 110, SEQ ID NOS:111, 112, SEQ ID NOS:127, 128, SEQ ID NOS:129, 130, SEQ ID NOS:133, 134, SEQ ID NOS:113, 114, SEQ ID NOS:145, 146, SEQ ID NOS:101, 102, SEQ ID NOS:179, 180, SEQ ID NOS:201, 202, SEQ ID NOS:159, 160, SEQ ID NOS:177, 178, SEQ ID NOS:181, 182, SEQ ID NOS:183, 184, SEQ ID NOS:185, 186, SEQ ID NOS:57, 58, SEQ ID NOS:197, 198, SEQ ID NOS:59, 60, SEQ ID NOS:67, 68, and SEQ ID NOS:359, 360.
The invention will be further described with reference to the following examples; however, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to such examples. Rather, in view of the present disclosure which describes the current best mode for practicing the invention, many modifications and variations would present themselves to those of skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of this invention. All changes, modifications, and variations coming within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be considered within their scope.
EXAMPLE 1
Phagemid Infections
For each library to be screened for nitrilases, an infection was set up as follows: 5 ml of an OD600 nm=1 resuspension of SEL700 cells and 1 ml of the phagemid library to be screened were combined. The combination was incubated in a 37° C. waterbath for 45 min
Using the infection, serial dilutions were made in 10 mM MgSO4, using 10 μl aliquots of the infection.











titer of library
dilutions to make







~105 cfu/ml
10−1 dilution


~106 cfu/ml
10−1, 10−2 dilution


~107 cfu/ml
10−1, 10−2, 10−3 dilution









60 μl of each of the following dilutions were deposited onto a small LB-kan50 plate:











titer of library
dilutions to make







~105 cfu/ml
undiluted infection, 10−1 dilution


~106 cfu/ml
10−1, 10−2 dilutions


~107 cfu/ml
10−2, 10−3 dilutions









The cells in the infection were centrifuged in a tabletop centrifuge at 4° C., 4.6 k rpm, 10 min to form pellets. The supernatant was decanted from the resulting pellets. The cells were resuspended in residual liquid. All of the resuspended cells were deposited onto a single large LB-kan50 plate. All plates were incubated at 30° C. overnight.
EXAMPLE 2
Selection Screenings
The cells of each infection plate were resuspended with  ̃4 mls 10 mM MgSO4. The resuspensions were placed in a tube. The remaining cells on each plate were resuspended with  ̃3 mls 10 mM MgSO4 and combined with the first resuspension from the same plate. The volume of each tube was brought to 12 ml with 10 mM MgSO4. The tubes were vortexed vigorously. The tubes were centrifuged in a tabletop centrifuge at 4° C. and 4.6 k for 10 min to form pellets. The supernatant was decanted from each resuspension. The washed cells in each tube were resuspended with 10 ml 10 mM MgSO4. The resuspensions from each library were stored at 4° C. until the selection cultures were ready to be set up.
For each resuspension, selection cultures were set up using the following process:

    
    
        1) The nitrilase selection medium was prepared, using: 1XM9 medium with 0.2% glucose, no nitrogen and 50 μg/rid kanamycin (for pBK phagemid libraries only; use ampicillin for pBS libraries).
        2) 5 ml of the medium was aliquoted into a 50 ml screw top conical tube.
        3) 25 μl of the stored resuspension was added to the tube.
        4) 5 μl of adiponitrile was added to the tube, to bring the final concentration to 8.8 mM. Additional nitrile substrates may be used, in place of adiponitrile.
        5) The resulting combination was cultured at 30° C.
    
    


Steps 1-5 were repeated for each nitrile substrate.
EXAMPLE 3
Isolation of a Positive Nitrilase Clone from Selection Cultures
Ten (10) μl of selection culture with growth was streaked out onto a small LB-kan50 plate and allowed to grow for 2 nights at 30° C. Five isolated cfu were picked and each was grown in 2 ml nitrilase selection medium at 30° C. Each culture was monitored (where growth indicates positive cfu was picked), and was removed when monitoring indicated that it was in a stationary phase of growth. One (1) ml of culture was used to do a plasmid preparation and was eluted with 40 μl elution buffer. Five to eight (5-8) μl DNA was cut with Pst I/Xho I or Sac I/Kpn I restriction enzymes to remove insert from vector. A restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) determination was carried out to identify the size of the insert. The insert was sequenced.
EXAMPLE 4
Screening and Characterization of Nitrilases
Nitrilases of the invention were screened against target substrates. Of those showing hydrolytic activity in a primary screen, enzymes with enantioselectivities above 20% enantiomeric excess (ee) were selected for further characterization. Those enzymes were selected based on: 1) having activity against one of the substrates of interest and 2) exhibition of greater than 35% ee (enantiomeric excess). The results of this screening process are set forth in Table 1 above. The products used for screening were: D-Phenylglycine, L-Phenyllactic acid, (R) 2-chloromandelic acid, (S)—Cyclohexylmandelic acid, L-2-methylphenylglycine, (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid, and 4-methyl-L-leucine.
Screening of Nitrilases Against Target Substrate D-Phenylglycine




The hydrolysis of phenylglycinonitrile was performed. Some of these enzymes showed an ee higher than 20% and those were selected for preliminary characterization.
Based on the preliminary characterization experiments, a number of putative hits were identified on phenylglycinonitrile and a large amount of data was accumulated on these enzymes. The data revealed many common properties: the majority of the enzymes had pH optima for activity at pH 7 and, in general, the enantioselectivity was enhanced at the lower pH values. The enzymes were found to be more active at higher temperature, particularly 38° C., although this temperature often resulted in lower enantioselectivities. The use of water-miscible co-solvents in the reaction was shown to be a practical option. The inclusion of 10-25% methanol (v/v) in the enzyme reactions did not substantially affect enzyme activity and in many cases, led to an increase in enantioselectivity. The use of biphasic systems has also shown some promise, with the enzymes maintaining their level of activity with the addition of up to 70% (v/v) of hexane and, in some cases, toluene. The use of ethyl acetate in the biphasic systems, however, led to lower activity.
Of the enzymes identified active on phenylglycinonitrile, the enantioselectivity of several enzymes was shown to remain above the success criterion of 35% ee. The preliminary characterization data indicated that some of the enzymes exhibited high enantioselectivities for D-phenylglycine, with corresponding conversion to product of 40-60%. Further investigation suggested that the rate of activity of some of these enzymes was faster than the rate of racemization of the substrate. Reducing the concentration of enzyme led to improved enantioselectivity; therefore, it appears that some benefit could be gained by control of the relative rates of the chemical racemization and the enzyme activity.
Screening of Nitrilases Against Target Substrate (R)-2-chloromandelic acid




Enzymes were identified which showed activity on 2-chloromandelonitrile. A high degree of overlap existed between the enzymes which were active on 2-chloromandelonitrile and phenylglycinonitrile. Many of these enzymes also formed a distinct sequence family.
Higher temperatures and neutral pH appeared to lead to the highest activity for the active enzymes. For the majority of the nitrilases, the enantioselectivity also increased at higher temperatures, particularly 38° C. The enzymes retained their activity in the presence of up to 25% methanol or 10% isopropanol; in many of these cases, the enantioselectivity was also enhanced. Activity in biphasic systems was largely comparable to aqueous conditions, particularly with hexane as the non-aqueous phase; varying tolerances to toluene were observed between the different nitrilases.







TABLE 4







Examples of enzymes for enantioselective hydrolysis of 2-chloromandelonitrile.















Time For

Turnover
Specific Activity



SEQ ID
Conversion
Highest
ee
(g Product/kg
(μmol Product/mg


NOS:
To Product
Conversion (h)
(%)
Nitrilase/h)
Nitrilase/h)
Conditions
















385, 386
22%
8
92
1014
88
pH 7, 38° C.; 20% MeOH


169, 170
36%
1
92
29278
39
pH 7, 38° C.; 20% MeOH


185, 186
44%
1
79
14559
99
pH 7, 38° C.


47, 48
43%
5
65
2475
20
pH 7, 38° C.; 10% MeOH


197, 198
>95%
1
87
45564
149
pH 6, 38° C.; 10% MeOH


187, 188
53%
1
82
14100
80
pH 7, 38° C.; 10% MeOH


217, 218
>95%
2
85
19773
185
pH 7, 38° C.; 10% MeOH


55, 56
>95%
1
93
52951
329
pH 8, 38° C.; 10% MeOH


167, 168
>95%
2
88
14895
100
pH 8, 38° C.; 10% MeOH


15, 16
55%
1
81
25825
308
pH 5, 38° C.; 10% MeOH
















TABLE 4A







Summary of optimal conditions determined from


characterization experiments for enantioselective


hydrolysis of 2-chloromandelonitrile.










SEQ ID

Optimum



NOS:
Optimum pH
Temp ° C.
Solvent Tolerance





385, 386
7
38
25% MeOH


169, 170
5
38
25% MeOH, 10%





IPA


185, 186
7
38
25% MeOH, 10%





IPA


47, 48
7
38
10% MeOH


197, 198
6
55
25% MeOH, 10%





IPA


187, 188
7
38
10% MeOH; 40%





IPA


217, 218
7
38
25% MeOH, 10%





IPA, 70% hexane,





40% toluene


55, 56
7
38
10% MeOH, IPA,





70% hexane


167, 168
9
38
10% MeOH, IPA,





70% hexane


15, 16
7
38
25% MeOH, 10%





IPA, 70% hexane,





40% toluene









Screening of Nitrilases Against Target Substrate (S)-phenyllactic acid:




Many of the nitrilases tested were active on phenaylacetaldehyde cyanohydrin. Many of these enzymes were part of two related sequence families and were distinct from those enzymes that were active on phenylglycinonitrile and chloromandelonitrile.
The pH optima of the enzymes was generally above pH 7 (i.e. pH 8 or 9), with higher enantioselectivities being exhibited at these levels. Most of the enzymes showed superior activity at higher temperature, particularly 38° C. The effect of temperature on the enantioselectivities of the enzymes varied; in most cases, this property was slightly lower at higher temperatures. While the enzymes were tolerant towards the addition of co-solvents, particularly 10% (v/v) methanol, no advantage in activity or enantioselectivity was gained by such additions. The use of a biphasic system was again shown to be feasible.







TABLE 5







Summary of optimal conditions determined from characterization


experiments for entantioselective hydrolysis of


phenylacetaldehyde cyanhydrin










SEQ ID

Optimum



NOS:
Optimum pH
Temp ° C.
Solvent Tolerance





103, 104
7
55
10% MeOH, IPA


 99, 100
8
38
10% MeOH, 70%





hexane, toluene


183, 184
9
38
10% MeOH, IPA,





70% toluene,





hexane


173, 174
5
38-55
25% MeOH, IPA,





70% hexane,





toluene


213, 214
7
38
10% MeOH, 25%





IPA, 70% hexane,





toluene


61, 62
7
38
10% MeOH, 70%





hexane, toluene


205, 206
8
38-55
10% MeOH, IPA,





40% hexane,





toluene


207, 208
8
38
10% MeOH, 70%





hexane


309, 210
8
38
10% MeOH, 40%





hexane, toluene


195, 196
8
38
10% MeOH, 40%





hexane, toluene


43, 44
9
38
10% MeOH, 40%





hexane


161, 162
9
38
25% MeOH, IPA,





10% hexane,





toluene


175, 176
6
38-55
10% MeOH, IPA,





40% hexane


293, 294
6
38
10% MeOH, IPA,





40% hexane
















TABLE 6







Summary of hit enzymes for enantioselective hydrolysis of phenylacetaldehyde cyanohydrin














Conversion
Time For

Turnover (g
Specific Activity



SEQ ID
To Product
Highest

Product/kg
(μmol Product/mg
Experimental


NOS:
(%)
Conversion (h)
ee (%)
Nitrilase/h)
Nitrilase/h)
Conditions1
















103, 104
77
3
94
 2339*
 14*
pH 7, 38° C.


 99, 100
90
4
82
19787 
119 
pH 8, 38° C.


183, 184
49
1
57
28153 
169 
pH 9, 38° C.


173, 174
20
2
83
3200
27
pH 5, 38° C.


213, 214
70
6
86
4372
26
pH 7, 38° C.


61, 62
56
5
80
5500
33
pH 7, 38° C.


205, 206
90
6
73
4458
27
pH 8, 38° C.


207, 208
78
4
81
9190
55
pH 8, 38° C.


209, 210
98
4
75
8343
50
pH 8, 38° C.


195, 196
89
4
89
6874
41
pH 8, 38° C.


43, 44
40
5
84
3879
23
pH 9, 38° C.


161, 162
>95
2
39
16430 
98
pH 9, 38° C.


175, 176
87
8
45
5065
30
pH 6, 38° C.


293, 294
>95
8
65
7725
46
pH 6, 38° C.





1Experiments were carried out using 25 mM substrate, at the pH and temperature conditions noted.


*Turnover in (g product/kg protein/h) and specific activity (:mol product/mg protein/h)






Screening of Nitrilases Against Target Substrate L-2-methylphenylglycine




Nitrilases have shown activity on this substrate and preferentially yielded the D-2-methylphenylglycine, rather than the required L-2-methylphenylglcyine.







TABLE 7







Summary of activity and enantioselectivity for SEQ ID NOS: 189, 190 on 2-methylphenylglycinonitrile

















Turnover (g




SEQ ID
Conversion To
Time For Highest
ee (%) for D-
Product/kg
Specific Activity (μmol
Experimental


NOS:
Product (%)
Conversion (h)
enantiomer
Nitrilase/h)
Product/mg Nitrilase/h)
Conditions1





189, 190
50%
4.5 h
45
2426
13
pH 7 38° C., 10%








MeOH









Screening of Nitrilases Against Target Substrate L-Hydroxynorleucine ((S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid)




A number of nitrilases, which showed activity on 2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanenitrile, were isolated. All of these enzymes showed enantioselectivity towards the L-isomer of the product.
As shown in Table 8, the enzymes all showed higher enantioselectivities at higher pH and appeared to more susceptible to the addition of solvents than the other nitrilases tested. Although activity was detected in the presence of organic solvents, it was generally lower than that of the aqueous control. Once again, the activity of the enzymes was negatively affected by the acid product and aldehyde starting material.







TABLE 8







Summary of optimal conditions determined from characterization


experiments for enantioselective hydrolysis of


2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanenitrile.










SEQ ID

Optimum



NOS:
Optimum pH
Temp ° C.
Solvent





217, 218
9
38
10% MeOH


55, 56
9
38
None


187, 188
9
38
10% MeOH


167, 168
9
38
None


221, 222
9
38









A range of hydrolytic activities was observed among the confirmed hit enzymes for 2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanenitrile.







TABLE 9







Summary of hit enzymes for enantioselective hydrolysis of 2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanenitrile.















Time For

Turnover (g
Specific Activity



SEQ ID
Conversion To
Highest

Product/kg
(μmol Product/mg
Experimental


NOS:
Product (%)
Conversion (h)
ee (%)
Nitrilase/h)
Nitrilase/h))
Conditions1
















217, 218
>95
1.5
52
33712
229
pH 9, 38° C.


55, 56
80
3
55
11221
76
pH 9, 38° C.


187, 188
50
6
60
1238
4
pH 9, 38° C., 10%








MeOH


167, 168
35
6
54
1684
11
pH 9, 38° C.


221, 222
80
3
55
9901
148
pH 9, 38° C.









Screening of Nitrilases Against Target Substrate 4-methyl-D-leucine and 4-methyl-L-leucine




Hydrolysis of 2-amino-4,4-dimethyl pentanenitrile was performed by several of the nitrilases. Of these, some were shown to hydrolyse the nitrile to the L-isomer of the corresponding acid and were selected for further characterization.







TABLE 10







Summary of hit enzymes for enantioselective hydrolysis of 2-amino-4,4-dimethyl pentanenitrile















Time For

Turnover
Specific Activity



SEQ ID
Conversion To
Highest

(g Product/kg
(μmol Product/mg


NOS:
Product (%)
Conversion (h)
ee (%)
Nitrilase/h)
Nitrilase/h)
Conditions1
















103, 104
30
0.5
91
12489
36
pH 7, room temp


59, 60
30
0.5
>99
33806
233
pH 7, room temp


221, 222
32
7.5
79
1098
7
pH 6, 38° C.
















TABLE 11







Summary of optimal conditions determined from characterization


experiments for enantioselective hydrolysis of


2-amino-4,4-dimethyl pentanenitrile










SEQ ID

Optimum



NOS:
Optimum pH
Temp ° C.
Solvent Tolerance





103, 104
7
23
25% MeOH, 10% IPA


59, 60
8
23
25% MeOH


221, 222
6
38
25% MeOH, 10% IPA









Screening of Nitrilases Against Target Substrate (S)-cyclohexylmandelic acid




Screening of Nitrilases Against Target Substrate Mandelonitrile




The nitrilase collection was also screened on mandelonitrile. The nitrilases actively hydrolyzed both phenylglycinonitrile and chloromandelonitrile.
Enzymatic Assay for Determination of Enantioselectivity
In the design of a spectroscopic system for determination of the chiral α-hydroxy acids and α-amino acids, an enzyme based assay which permits the detection of product formation and enantioselectivity was developed and used.
Spectroscopic systems for the detection of α-hydroxy- and for α-amino-acids based on lactate dehydrogenase (L-LDH & D-LDH) and on amino acid oxidase (L-AA Oxid & D-AA Oxid) are described in FIGS. 6 and 7. These enzymes were chosen because they are reported to have reasonably broad substrate ranges while still retaining near absolute enantiospecificity.
The overall feasibility of this system has been established (Table 12). Neither the parent hydroxynitrile nor the aminonitrile is metabolized by the secondary or detection enzyme and thus starting material does not interfere. Cell lysate which is not heat treated results in background activity for the LDH system; however, heat inactivation eliminates the background activity. Cell lysate does not appear to interfere in the AA Oxidase assay. One concern is the inactivation of the AA Oxidase, which utilizes a FMN co-factor, by residual cyanide. However, the control studies indicated that at 2 mM PGN (which could release up to 2 mM HCN) inactivation is not a problem. This assay is suitable for automation of 384 well (or possibly greater density) microtiter plates.







TABLE 12







Summary of Identification of Secondary Enzyme


to Chiral Detection of Acid Product.











ENZYME WITH SUITABLE




ACTIVITY FOUND FROM



SUBSTRATE
COMMERCIAL SOURCE











Hydroxy Acid Products:










L-lactic acid
YES



D-lactic acid
YES



L-phenyl lactic acid
YES



D-phenyl lactic acid
YES



S-cyclohexylmandelic acid1
Not applicable



R-cyclohexylmandelic acid1
Not applicable







Amino Acid Products:










4-methyl-L-leucine
YES



4-methyl-L/D-leucine
YES (D-unknown)



D-phenylalanine
YES



R-phenylglycine
YES



L-homophenyllactic acid
YES



D-homophenyllactic acid
YES



L-homophenylalanine
YES



D-homophenylalanine
YES



(S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy
YES



hexanoic acid



(R/S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy
YES (D-unknown)



hexanoic acid



L-methylphenylglycine1
Not Applicable



D-methylphenylglycine1
Not Applicable







1The assay will not be applicable to cyclohexylmandelic acid and 2-methylphenylglycine, as tertiary alcohols are not amenable to this particular oxidation






EXAMPLE 5
Standard Assay Conditions
The following solutions were prepared:

    
    
        Substrate stock solution: 50 mM of the aminonitrile substrate in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7) or 50 mM of the cyanohydrin substrate in 0.1 M Na Acetate buffer (pH 5)
        Enzyme stock solution: 3.33 ml of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7) to each vial of 20 mg of lyophilized cell lysate (final concentration 6 mg protein/ml)
    
    


Procedure:

    
    
        Add 100 μl of the 50 mM substrate solution to the appropriate number of wells of a 96-well plate
        Add 80 μl of buffer to each well
        Add 20 μl of enzyme solution to each well
        Blank controls were set up by substitution of 20 μl of buffer for the enzyme solution
        Negative controls consisting of 20 μl of enzyme solution in 180 μl of buffer were also included in many of the experiments. Once it had been established that the cell lysate did not interfere with the detection of the products, these controls were not included.
    
    


Sampling of Reactions:
The reactions were sampled by removing an aliquot from each well (15-50 μl) and diluting the samples as follows:

    
    
        Samples for non-chiral HPLC analysis:
        Phenylglycine, 2-chloromandelic acid and phenyllactic acid: initially, the samples were diluted 2-fold with water and a further 2-fold with methanol or acetonitrile (final dilution: 4-fold). It was found that an 8-fold dilution of these samples led to improved chromatographic separation
        (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid, 4-methylleucine, t-leucine, 2-methylphenylglycine and cyclohexylmandelic acid: samples were diluted 1:1 with methanol or acetonitrile. The choice of solvent was based on the solvent used in the HPLC analysis method.
        Samples for chiral HPLC analysis:
        Phenylglycine, 2-chloromandelic acid and phenyllactic acid: as described above for the non-chiral analyses, the samples for chiral analyses were initially diluted 2-fold and in the later stages of the project, at 4-fold.
        (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid, 4-methylleucine, t-leucine, 2-methylphenylglycine: samples were diluted 1:1 with methanol or acetonitrile
        For each experiment, a standard curve of the product was included in the HPLC run. The curve was plotted on an X-Y axis and the concentration of product in the samples calculated from the slope of these curves.
        For the preliminary characterization experiments, samples were taken such that the activity of the enzymes was in the linear phase; this was performed so that differences in the effects of the parameters on the rate of reaction, rather than the complete conversion, could be determined. The sampling times are denoted in the tables included in the text.
        
            The samples were analyzed by HPLC, using the methods outlined in Tables 20 and 21.
        
        
    
    


EXAMPLE 6
Determination of the Effect of pH on Enzyme Activity and Enantioselectivity
The effect of pH on the enzyme activity and enantioselectivity was studied by performance of the standard assay in a range of different buffers:

    
    
        0.1 M Citrate Phosphate pH 5
        0.1 M Citrate Phosphate pH 6
        0.1 M Sodium Phosphate pH 7
        0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 8
        M Tris-HCl pH 9
    
    


The samples were analyzed by non-chiral and chiral HPLC methods and examples of the results are presented in Tables 5, 8 and 11 herein.
EXAMPLE 7
Determination of the Effect of Temperature on Enzyme Activity and Enantioselectivity
The effect of temperature on the activity and enantioselectivity was investigated by performing the standard assay at room temperature, 38° C. and 55° C. The samples were analyzed by non-chiral and chiral HPLC methods and examples of the results are given in Tables 5, 8 and 11 herein.
EXAMPLE 8
Determination of the Effect of Solvents on Enzyme Activity and Enantioselectivity
The enzyme reactions were performed in the presence of cosolvents and as biphasic systems, in order to investigate the effect of water-miscible and water-immiscible solvents on the enzymes. In the presence of cosolvents, the reactions were run under standard conditions, with substitution of the buffer with methanol or isopropanol. The final concentrations of solvent in the reactions was 0, 10, 25 and 40% (v/v).
The biphasic reactions were also carried out under standard conditions, with a layer of water-immiscible organic solvent forming the nonaqueous phase. The solvent was added at the following levels: 0%, 10%, 40% and 70% (v/v) of the aqueous phase. The samples from these reactions were evaporated by centrifugation under vacuum and redissolved in a 50:50 mixture of methanol or acetonitrile and water. The samples were analyzed by non-chiral and chiral HPLC methods.
EXAMPLE 9
Determination of the Effect of Process Components on Enzyme Activity and Enantioselectivity
Activity
The effect of the process components on the activity of the enzymes was established by addition of the individual components to the enzymatic reaction. These components included the starting materials for the nitrile synthesis, aldehyde, cyanide and ammonium, as well as triethylamine, which is added in catalytic amounts to the nitrile synthesis reaction. The concentrations of the reactants were selected with possible process conditions in mind and were adapted to the levels of reactants used in the enzyme assays. In some cases, the solubility of the aldehydes and products was relatively low; in these cases, the highest level of solubility was added to the reactions as the highest level and 10% of this level as the lower value.
The enzymatic reactions were carried out under standard conditions, with addition of one or more of the following components: benzaldehyde, phenylglycine, phenylacetaldehyde, phenyllactic acid, 2-chlorobenzaldehyde, 2-chloromandelic acid, 5-hydroxypentanal, (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid, 4-methylleucine, KCN, Triethylamine, NH4Cl. Control reactions were performed under standard conditions, with no additive. The samples were analyzed by non-chiral HPLC.
Stability
The stability of the enzymes to process conditions was monitored by incubation of the enzymes in the presence of the individual reaction components for predetermined time periods, prior to assay of the enzyme activity under standard conditions. In these experiments, the enzymes were incubated at a concentration of 1.2 mg protein/ml in the presence of each of the following reaction components: methanol, benzaldehyde, phenylglycine, phenylacetaldehyde, phenyllactic acid, 2-chlorobenzaldehyde, 2-chloromandelic acid, 5-hydroxypentanal, (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid, KCN, NH4C1.
Assay Conditions:
At 0, 2, 6 and 24 hours of incubation in the particular additive, 50 μl of the enzyme solution was removed, 50 μl of a 50 mM substrate stock solution added and the enzyme activity assayed under standard conditions. After substrate addition, the reactions were sampled at the following times: Phenylglycinonitrile: 10 mins; Phenylacetaldehyde cyanohydrin: 1 hour; 2-chloromandelonitrile: 2 hours. Control reactions were performed by incubation of the enzyme in buffer only. The samples were analyzed using non-chiral HPLC methods.
EXAMPLE 10
Confirmation of Putative Hit Enzymes
Following the preliminary characterization experiments, the enzymes which were identified as putative hits were assayed under the optimal conditions determined, in order to evaluate their performance, especially in terms of enantioselectivity, when higher conversions were attained. The enzymes were assayed with 25 mM substrate, under the conditions of pH and temperature noted in the tables included in the text. A standard concentration of 0.6 mg/ml protein was used for each of the enzymes, unless otherwise stated.
EXAMPLE 11
Selected Examples of Chromatograms from Enzyme Reactions
In this section, representative examples of chromatograms for each substrate and product combination will be shown, together with a discussion of some of the challenges encountered with the methods and how they were addressed.
D-Phenylglycine
Non-chiral analysis showing the substrate peak eluting at 2.6 min and 3.2 min. See FIGS. 8A-8E. The two peaks were present in all samples containing higher concentrations of the nitrile; the second peak is thought to be a product associated with the nitrile; it decreased with time and was no longer present once complete conversion to the product had taken place. The chromatogram shown in FIG. 8A is a blank control, containing only nitrile and buffer; the samples were all diluted with water and solvent as explained in section 1 above. This was repeated for all samples discussed below. An enzymatic reaction sample is shown in the chromatogram in FIG. 8B, with the product eluting at 0.4 min.
Of note in these chromatograms is the small solvent front peak eluting at 0.3 min. Further representation of this peak is given in the chromatogram shown in FIG. 8C, in which a negative control consisting of cell lysate in buffer, was run. A very small peak coeluted with the product at 0.4 min. In the initial phase of the project, this peak was regarded as problematic, although the appropriate controls were run with each experiment for in order to maintain accuracy. In these experiments, the peak area resulting from the cell lysate, although it was relatively small, was subtracted from the peak areas of the product in the enzymatic reactions. Improvement of this analysis was obtained by further dilution of the samples and the use of lower injection volumes on the HPLC. Following the implementation of these improvements, interference by this peak was shown to be minimal, as shown in the chromatogram illustrated in FIG. 6C.
The chiral analysis of phenylglycine is shown in chromatogram in FIG. 6D with the L-enantiomer eluting at 6 min and the D-enantiomer at 11 min Good resolution between the two isomers was obtained. However, the column used was very sensitive and the characteristics of the column appeared to change over time, resulting in changes in the elution times of the acids. While this was easily detected by the use of the proper controls and standards, a greater problem existed in the coelution of the nitrile peak with the D-enantiomer (chromatogram shown in FIG. 6E). The cause of this coelution was unclear; however, it was easily detected by the use of appropriate standards; in addition, the UV spectrum of the acid was very distinctive, making the use of this tool effective in detecting the coelution. The problem was also easily resolved by adjusting the methanol content in the mobile phase.
(R)-2-chloromandelic acid
The HPLC analysis of chloromandelic acid and chloromandelonitrile offered many of the challenges associated with the analysis of the phenylglycine samples. From the chromatogram shown in FIG. 7A, which contains only chloromandelonitrile in buffer, it is evident that a peak eluted at the same time as the product in the chromatogram shown in FIG. 7B, which represents a chloromandelic acid standard. The contribution of the cell lysate to this peak was found to be small; it would appear that the greatest contribution to this peak was from the chloromandelonitrile, either from a breakdown product or a contaminant in the nitrile preparation. The peak area remained constant throughout each experiment and, using the appropriate controls, it was found that subtraction of the peak area from that of the product yielded sufficient accuracy. Many attempts were made to change the HPLC conditions so that the product peak eluted at a later time; however, these attempts were not successful. Chromatogram shown in FIG. 7C illustrates the appearance of product and the reduction of the substrate peaks.
The chiral analysis of chloromandelic acid was almost problem-free. The elution of a small peak at the same time as the (S)-enantiomer presented some concern (the peak at 2.4 min in chromatogram shown in FIG. 7D). However, once it was established that this peak was present in all the samples at the same level, including the blank control, and that it had a different UV spectrum to that of the chloromandelic acid peak, it was not regarded as a problem. Consequently, it was subtracted from the peak eluting at 2.4 min in each sample. The (R)-enantiomer eluted at 3 minutes.
(S)-phenyllactic acid
The analysis of phenyllactic acid was initially plagued with the same problems discussed for phenylglycine and 2-chloromandelic acid. However, in this case, adjustment of the solvent concentration in the nonchiral HPLC method led to a shift in the retention time of the acid, so that it no longer coeluted with the cell lysate peak. Following this, no problems were encountered with either the nonchiral or chiral methods. Representative nonchiral chromatograms of the product (1.9 min) and cyanohydrin substrate (3.7 min) are shown in FIG. 8A, while the chiral analysis of the acid is shown in FIG. 8B, with the L-enantiomer eluting at 2 min and the opposite enantiomer at 6 min
L-2-methylphenylglycine
The analysis of methylphenylglycine was unproblematic, although the nonchiral method did not provide baseline separation between a cell lysate peak and the product peak, as shown in the chromatogram illustrated in FIG. 9A. The amino acid standard for this method was provided in the final stages of the project, thus minimizing the time for method development. In the chromatogram shown in FIG. 9A the amino acid elutes at 0.7 min and the aminonitrile at 5.0 min. Sufficient separation between the two initial peaks was obtained to allow the calculation of approximate conversion to product.
The chiral analysis of this compound provided good separation between the two enantiomers, as shown in the chromatogram illustrated in FIG. 9B. The L-enantiomer elutes at 5 min and the D-enantiomer at 8 min.
L-tert-leucine
For the nonchiral analysis of t-leucine, the cell lysate presented the most serious problem amongst the group of products for this project. This was compounded by the low spectroscopic properties of the amino acid, leading to difficulty in differentiating the product peak from the cell lysate. Good separation of the individual product enantiomers was obtained by chiral analysis as shown in FIG. 10A. During the primary screen, a small peak eluted at the same time as the L-amino acid standard in certain samples (see FIG. 10B) and was thought to be the amino acid. However, further development of the method and the use of the appropriate controls established that this peak was actually a cell lysate peak.
The aminonitrile eluted between the two t-leucine peaks, as shown in FIG. 10C; this chromatogram also shows the cell lysate peak at 4.8 min. The UV spectrum of the nitrile was distinct from that of the amino acid, making it easier to differentiate from the acid peaks.
L-hydroxynorleucine ((S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid)
The chiral analysis of (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid was consistent and reliable. By contrast, the nonchiral method presented many problems, primarily as a result of non-separation between the nitrile and the acid peaks. Towards the latter half of the project, a method was developed and used successfully for the confirmation of activities. Prior to this, most of the analysis was performed using the chiral method; standard curves of the products were run in order to quantify the reactions. A representative chromatogram of (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid is shown in FIG. 11A, with (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid eluting at 6 min. The aminonitrile was not detected by this method.
Separation of the individual 2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid enantiomers is shown in FIG. 11B. The L-enantiomer elutes first, at 2 min, followed by the D-enantiomer at 3 min. In FIG. 11C, an enzymatic sample is represented; the only area of slight concern is the negative peak preceding the elution of the L-enantiomer. However, it did not appear to interfere significantly with the elution of this enantiomer; method development did not eliminate the negative peak.
4-methyl-D-leucine and 4-methyl-L-leucine
For the detection of 4-methylleucine, the chiral HPLC method again proved more reliable. The combination of low activities, together with the low sensitivity of the method to the compound led to difficulties in detection using nonchiral HPLC. A 2.5 mM standard of the amino acid is shown in FIG. 12A, with a peak height of approximately 40 mAU; this was substantially lower than those detected for the aromatic compounds. Chromatogram in FIG. 12B shows an enzymatic sample, in which conversion was detected using the chiral HPLC method; while it is not clear, it would appear that the 4-methylleucine peak elutes at 2.7 min and is extremely low in both peak height and area. This peak did not appear in samples which were negative by chiral HPLC analysis.
The chiral analysis of 4-methyl-L-leucine and 4-methyl-D-leucine did not present any problems. The L-enantiomer eluted at 5 min and the D-enantiomer at 7 min, although some peak shift did occur, as a result of the sensitivity to the column, described in section (i) for phenylglycine. In chromatograms shown in FIGS. 14C-14D, the separation of these amino acids is shown; the first sample represents an enzyme which produced both enantiomers and in the second sample, the enzyme preferentially hydrolyzed the L-enantiomer, with a small amount D-amino acid forming.
(S)-cyclohexylmandelic acid
Chromatograms of the standards for cyclohexylmandelic acid (FIG. 13A) and the corresponding nitrile (FIG. 13B) are shown. The acid eluted at 1.3 min, while the cyanohydrin was observed at 2.5 min. The peak eluting at 2.1 min is thought to be the cyclohexylphenylketone, as shown by the elution of a ketone standard at this point.
EXAMPLE 12
An Enzyme Library Approach to Biocatalysis
Development of a Nitrilase Platform for Enantioselective Production of Carboxylic Acid Derivatives
Biocatalytic processes can offer unique advantages in transformations that are challenging to accomplish through conventional chemical methods (Wong, C.-H.; Whitesides, G. M. Enzymes in Synthetic Organic Chemistry; Pergamon, New York, 1994; Drauz, K.; Waldmann, H., Roberts, S. M. Eds. Enzyme Catalysis in Organic Synthesis; VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2nd ed., 2002). Nitrilases (EC 3.5.5.1) promote the mild hydrolytic conversion of organonitriles directly to the corresponding carboxylic acids (Kobayashi, M.; Shimizu, S. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1994, 120, 217; Bunch, A. W. In Biotechnology; Rehm, H.-J.; Reed, G.; Puhler, A.; Stadler, P., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, Vol. 8a, Chapter 6, pp 277-324; Wieser, M.; Nagasawa, T. In Stereoselective Biocatalysis; Patel, R. N., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 2000, Chapter 17, pp 461-486.) Fewer than fifteen microbially-derived nitrilases have been characterized and reported to date. (Harper, D. B. Int. J. Biochem. 1985, 17, 677; Levy-Schil, S.; Soubrier, F.; Crutz-Le Coq, A. M.; Faucher, D.; Crouzet, J.; Petre, D. Gene 1995, 161, 15; Yu, F. 1999, U.S. Pat. No. 5,872,000; Ress-Loschke, M.; Friedrich, T.; Hauer, B.; Mattes, R.; Engels, D. PCT Appl. WO 00/23577, Apr. 2000.). Several nitrilases previously have been explored for the preparation of single-enantiomer carboxylic acids, although little progress has been made in the development of nitrilases as viable synthetic tools. This application describes the discovery of a large and diverse set of nitrilases and herein demonstrate the utility of this nitrilase library for identifying enzymes that catalyze efficient enantioselective production of valuable hydroxy carboxylic acid derivatives.
In an effort to access the most diversified range of enzymes that can be found in Nature, we create large genomic libraries by extracting DNA directly from environmental samples that have been collected from varying global habitats. (For a description of these methods, see: Short, J. M. Nature Biotech. 1997, 15, 1322; Handelsman, J.; Rondon, M. J.; Brady, S. F.; Clardy, J.; Goodman, R. M. Chem. Biol. 1998, 5, R245; Henne, A.; Daniel, R.; Schmitz, R. A.; Gottschalk, G. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 3901.). We have established a variety of methods for identifying novel activities through screening mixed populations of uncultured DNA. (Robertson, D. E.; Mathur, E. J.; Swanson, R. V.; Mans, B. L.; Short, J. M. SIM News 1996, 46, 3; Short, J. M. U.S. Pat. No. 5,958,672, 1999; Short J. M. U.S. Pat. No. 6,030,779, 2000.) Through this approach, nearly 200 new nitrilases have been discovered and characterized. (For a concise description of the studies, see Materials and Methods section below.) All nitrilases were defined as unique at the sequence level and were shown to possess the conserved catalytic triad Glu-Lys-Cys which is characteristic for this enzyme class. (Pace, H.; Brenner, C. Genome Biology 2001, 2, 0001.1-0001.9.) Each nitrilase in our library was overexpressed and stored as a lyophilized cell lysate in order to facilitate rapid evaluation of the library for particular biocatalytic functions.
The initial investigations focused upon the efficacy of nitrilases for production of α-hydroxy acids 2 formed through hydrolysis of cyanohydrins 1. Cyanohydrins are well-documented to racemize readily under basic conditions through reversible loss of HCN. (Inagaki, M.; Hiratake, J.; Nishioka, T.; Oda, J.; J. Org. Chem 1992, 57, 5643. (b) van Eikeren, P. U.S. Pat. No. 5,241,087, 1993.) Thus, a dynamic kinetic resolution process is possible whereby an enzyme selectively hydrolyzes only one enantiomer of 1, affording 2 in 100% theoretical yield and with high levels of enantiomeric purity.
One important application of this type involves commercial production of (R)-mandelic acid from mandelonitrile. (Ress-Loschke, M.; Friedrich, T.; Hauer, B.; Mattes, R.; Engels, D. PCT Appl. WO 00/23577, Apr. 2000; Yamamoto, K.; Oishi, K.; Fujimatsu, I.; Komatsu, K. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991, 57, 3028; Endo, T.; Tamura, K. U.S. Pat. No. 5,296,373, Mar. 1994.) Mandelic acid and derivatives find broad use as intermediates and resolving agents for production of many pharmaceutical and agricultural products. (Coppola, G. M.; Schuster, H. F. Chiral α-Hydroxy Acids in Enantioselective Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany: 1997.) However, the few known nitrilases derived from cultured organisms have not been found useful for efficient and selective hydrolysis of analogous substrates.




The nitrilase library was screened for activity and enantioselectivity in the hydrolysis of mandelonitrile (3a, Ar=phenyl) to mandelic acid. Preliminary results revealed that 27 enzymes afforded mandelic acid in >90% ee. One enzyme, SEQ ID NOS:385, 386, was studied in greater detail and was found to be very active for hydrolysis of mandelonitrile. Under standard conditions using 25 mM 3a and 0.12 mg/mL enzyme in 10% MeOH (v/v) 0.1 M phosphate buffer at 37° C. and pH 8, (R)-mandelic acid was formed quantitatively within 10 min and with 98% ee. To confirm synthetic utility, the reaction was performed using 1.0 g 3a (50 mM) and 9 mg nitrilase (0.06 mg/mL nitrilase I); after 3 h (R)-mandelic acid was isolated in high yield (0.93 g, 86%) and again with 98% ee.











TABLE 13







SEQ ID NOS: 385, 386-catalyzed production of


mandelic acid derivatives and analogues 4a











Entry
Ar in 4
Spec. Act.b
TOFc
% eed














1
C6H5
50
28
98


2
2-Cl—C6H5
3
1.7
97


3
2-Br—C6H5
10
5.6
96


4
2-Me—C6H5
9
5.1
95


5
3-Cl—C6H5
6
3.4
98


6
3-Br—C6H5
3
1.7
99


7
4-F—C6H5
21
11.8
99


8
1-naphthyl
5
2.8
95


9
2-naphthyl
5
2.8
98


10
3-pyridyl
33
18.6
97


11
3-thienyl
30
16.8
95









(a) Reactions were conducted under standard conditions (see text). Reaction time for complete conversion to 4 was 1-3 h. Entries 8-9 were conducted at pH 9 and 5 mM substrate concentration. (b) Specific activities were measured at 5 min transformation timepoints and are expressed as μmol mg−1 min−1 (c) TOF=turnover frequency, mol product/mol catalyst/sec. (d) Enantioselectivities were determined by chiral HPLC analysis. Hydroxy acids were isolated and absolute configurations were determined to be (R) in all cases.
The substrate scope of SEQ ID NOS:385, 386 was next explored. As shown in Table 13, a broad range of mandelic acid derivatives as well as aromatic and heteroaromatic analogues (4) may be prepared through this method. SEQ ID NOS:385, 386 tolerates aromatic ring substituents in the ortho-, meta-, and para-positions of mandelonitrile derivatives and products of type 4 were produced with high enantioselectivities. Other larger aromatic groups such as 1-naphthyl and 2-naphthyl also are accommodated within the active site, again affording the acids 4 with high selectivity (Table 13, entries 8-9). Finally, 3-pyridyl and 3-thienyl analogues of mandelic acid were prepared readily using this process (Table 13, entries 10-11). This is the first reported demonstration of a nitrilase that affords a range of mandelic acid derivatives and heteroaromatic analogues of type 4. High activity on the more sterically encumbered ortho-substituted and 1-naphthyl derivatives is particularly noteworthy.
We next examined the preparation of aryllactic acid derivatives 6 through hydrolysis of the corresponding cyanohydrins 5. Phenyllactic acid and derivatives serve as versatile




building blocks for the preparation of numerous biologically active compounds. (Coppola, G. M.; Schuster, H. F. Chiral α-Hydroxy Acids in Enantioselective Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany: 1997.) Upon screening our nitrilase library against the parent cyanohydrin 5a (Ar=phenyl), we found several enzymes that provided 6a with high enantiomeric excess. One enzyme, SEQ ID NOS:103, 104, was further characterized. After optimization, SEQ ID NOS:103, 104, was shown to provide (S)-phenyllactic acid (6a) with complete conversion (50 mM) and very high enantioselectivity (98% ee) over 6 h. The highest enantioselectivity previously reported for biocatalytic

conversion of 5 to 6 was 75% ee achieved through a whole cell transformation using a Pseudomonas strain. (Hashimoto, Y.; Kobayashi, E.; Endo, T.; Nishiyama, M.; Horinouchi, S. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 1996, 60, 1279.)







TABLE 14







Nitrilase II-catalyzed production of aryllactic


acid derivatives and analogues 6a











Entry
Ar in 6
Spec. Act.b
TOFc
% eed














1
C6H5
25
16
99


2
2-Me—C6H5
160
100
95


3
2-Br—C6H5
121
76
95


4
2-F—C6H5
155
97
91


5
3-Me—C6H5
21
13
95


6
3-F—C6H5
22
14
99


7
1-naphthyl
64
40
96


8
2-pyridyl
10.5
6.6
99


9
3-pyridyl
11.6
7.2
97


10
2-thienyl
3.4
2.1
96


11
3-thienyl
2.3
1.4
97





aReaction conditions as in Table 13, except 0.016 mg/mL nitrilase was used. Full conversion to 6 was observed within 6 h.


b-dSee Table 13. The absolute configuration was determined to be (S) for phenyllactic acid and entries 2-11 was assigned (S) based upon identical chiral HPLC peak elution order.






Ortho and meta substituents appear to be tolerated well by nitrilase II, with ortho substituted derivatives surprisingly being converted with higher rates relative to the parent substrate 5a. Novel heteroaromatic derivatives, such as 2-pyridyl-, 3-pyridyl, 2-thienyl- and 3-thienyllactic acids, were prepared with high conversions and enantioselectivities (entries 8-11). Unexpectedly, para substituents greatly lowered the rates of these reactions, with full conversion taking over two weeks under these conditions.
The final transformation that we examined was desymmetrization of the readily available prochiral substrate 3-hydroxyglutarylnitrile (7) (Johnson, F.; Panella, J. P.; Carlson, A. A. J. Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 2241) to afford hydroxy acid (R)-8 which, once esterified to (R)-9, is an intermediate used in the manufacture of the cholesterol-lowering drug LIPITORTM. Previously reported attempts to use enzymes for this process were unsuccessful and 8 was produced with low selectivity (highest: 22% ee) and the undesired (S)-configuration. (Crosby, J. A.; Parratt, J. S.; Turner, N. J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1992, 3, 1547; Beard, T.; Cohen, M. A.; Parratt, J. S.; Turner, N. J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993, 4, 1085; Kakeya, H.; Sakai, N.; Sano, A.; Yokoyama, M.; Sugai, T.; Ohta, H. Chem. Lett. 1991, 1823.)




The nitrilase library was screened and unique enzymes were discovered and isolated that provided the required product (R)-8 with high conversion (>95%) and >90% ee. Using one of the (R)-specific nitrilases, this process was operated on a 1.0 g scale (240 mM 7, 30 mg enzyme, 22° C., pH 7) and after 22 h, (R)-8 was isolated in 98% yield and 95% ee. Interestingly, the same screening program also identified nitrilases that afford the opposite enantiomer (S)-8 with 90-98% ee. Thus, the extensive screen of biodiversity has uncovered enzymes that provide ready access to either enantiomer of the intermediate 8 with high enantioselectivities. Our discovery of the first enzymes that furnish (R)-8 underscores the advantage of having access to a large and diverse library of nitrilases.










SUMMARY for Nitrilases Activity on


HydroxyGlutarylnitrile (Primary Data)












SEQ ID NO:
% ee
% Conversion
LIPITOR TM
















107, 108
100
79
S



109, 110
100
79
S



111, 112
91
32
S



127, 128
92
106
S



129, 130
100
22
S



133, 134
86
14
S



113, 114
100
108
S



145, 146
100
100
S



101, 102
100
61
S



179, 180
100
75
S



201, 202
100
100
S



159, 160
100
71
S



177, 178
100
11
S



181, 182
100
58
S



183, 184
100
19
S



185, 186
100
78
S



191, 192
100
67
S



57, 58
100
73
S



197, 198
100
64
S



41, 42
100
16
R



59, 60
100
100
S



207, 208
100
111
R



209, 210
92
100
R



73, 74
100
3
R



153, 154
35
39



171, 172
27
33



195, 196
100
87
R



43, 44
100
111
R



67, 68
100
35
S



359, 360
100
87
S










By plumbing our environmental genomic libraries created from uncultured DNA, we have discovered a large array of novel nitrilases. This study has revealed specific nitrilases that furnish mandelic and aryllactic acid derivatives, as well as either enantiomer of 4-cyano-3-hydroxybutyric acid in high yield and enantiomeric excess.
Procedures and Analytical Data:
Hydroxyglutarylnitrile was purchased from TCI America and used as received. Amino acids used for the preparation of aryl lactic acid standards were purchased from PepTech (Cambridge, Mass.). (R)-3-hydroxy-4-cyanobutyric acid was obtained from Gateway Chemical Technology (St. Louis, Mo.). Both (R)- and (S)-mandelic acid and (R)- and (S)-phenyl lactic acid standards were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. All other reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and utilized without further purification. Silica Gel, 70-230 mesh, 60 Å, purchased from Aldrich, was used for chromatographic purifications. All 1H NMRs and 13C NMRs were run on Bruker model AM-500 machines, set at room temperature, 500 MHz and 125 MHz respectively for 1H and 13C. Mass analyses and unit mass resolution was achieved by flow injection analysis (FIA) using a Perkin-Elmer Sciex API-4000 TURBOIONTM Spray LC/MS/MS system. The LC flow was provided by Schimadzu LC-10Advp pumps, with 0.05% acetic acid and MeOH. Injections were accomplished via a Valco injector valve. The HPLC analysis was done on an Agilent 1100 HPLC with Astec's Chirobiotic R column (100×4.6 mm, cat no. 13022 or 150×4.6 mm, cat no. 13023) or Daicel's Chiralcel OD column (50×4.6 mm, cat no. 14022) and the DAD detector set at 210, 220, 230, and 250 nm. For specific rotations, a Perkin Elmer Model 341 Polarimeter was used, set at 589 nm, Na lamp, at room temperature, with a 100 mm path length cell. Concentrations for specific rotation are reported in grams per 100 mL of solvent. Microbiology techniques were executed in accordance to published protocols. (Sambrook, J. Fritsch, E F, Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2nd ed.), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview N.Y.) Glycolic acid products were isolated and absolute configurations were determined to be (R) in all cases by comparison with literature optical rotation data on configurationally defined compounds except for (−)-3-pyridylglycolic acid, which to our knowledge is not known as a single enantiomer. (For mandelic, 2-chloromandelic, 2-methyl mandelic, 3-chloromandelic, 3-bromomandelic and 4-fluoromandelic acid see Hoover, J. R. E.; Dunn, G. L.; Jakas, D. R.; Lam, L. L.; Taggart, J. J.; Guarini, J. R.; Phillips, L. J. Med. Chem. 1974, 17(1), 34-41; For 2-bromo mandelic acid see Collet, A.; Jacques, J.; Bull. Soc. Chem. Fr. 1973, 12, 3330-3331; For 1- and 2-napthylglycolic acid see Takahashi, I; Y. Aoyagi, I. Nakamura, Kitagawa, A., Matsumoto, K., Kitajima, H. Isa, K. Odashima, K. Koga, K. Heterocycles 1999, 51(6), 1371-88; For 3-thienylglycolic acid Gronowitz, S. Ark. Kemi, 1957, 11, 519-525.)
For the aryl lactic acid products, absolute configuration was established to be (5) for phenyl lactic acid by comparison with literature optical rotation and for all other phenyl lactic acid products, absolute configurations were predicted based upon elution order using chiral HPLC. Absolute configuration for 3-hydroxy-4-cyano-butanoic acid was established by derivatization to (R)-(−)-Methyl (3-O-[benzoyl]-4-cyano)-butanoate and comparison to literature optical rotation data on configurationally defined compound. (3. Beard, T. Cohen, M. A. Parma, J. S. Turner, N. J. Tetrahedron: Asymm. 4(6), 1993, 1085-1104.)
Nitrilase Discovery and Characterization Methods:
1. Nitrilase Selection.
An Escherichia coli screening host strain, SEL700, was optimized for nitrilase selections on a nitrile substrate. An Abs600 nm=1, resuspension of SEL700 screening host in 10 mM MgSO4 was infected with kanamycin-resistant environmental DNA library for 45 minutes at 37° C., such that complete screening coverage of the library was achieved. Infected cells, now denoted by kanamycin resistance, were plated on kanamycin LB plates and allowed to grow overnight at 30° C. Titer plates were also made to determine infection efficiency. Cells were pooled, washed, and resuspended the next morning with 10 mM MgSO4. Transformed clones were inoculated into M9 media (without nitrogen) with 10 mM of nitrile substrate. M9 media consisted of 1×M9 salts (NH4Cl omitted), 0.1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgSO4, 0.2% glucose, and approximately 10 mM of a nitrile selection substrate. The selection cultures were then incubated at 30° C., shaking at 200 rpm, for up to five weeks. Positive nitrilase cultures were identified by growth, due to positive clone's ability to hydrolyze nitrile substrate. Positive clones were isolated by streaking out a selection culture with growth and subsequent secondary culturing of isolated colonies in the same defined media. The DNA from any positive secondary cultures exhibiting re-growth was then isolated and sequenced to confirm discovery of a nitrilase gene and to establish the unique nature of that gene.
2. Nitrilase Biopanning
Traditional filter lift hybridization screening protocols are limited to libraries with approximately 106 to 107 members. Attempting to screen one library would require approximately 5,000 filter lifts. Therefore, solution phase and other biopanning formats have been developed for ultra high throughput sequence based screening permitting rapid screening of up to 108 member environmental libraries In the solution format, the DNA from a large number of library clones is mixed with tagged molecules of interest under conditions which promote hybridization. The tagged clones and hybridized DNA are then removed from solution and washed at some level of stringency to remove clones which do not have sequence identity with the probe. The hybridized DNA is then eluted and recovered. Clones of interest are sequenced and cloned to provide enzyme activities of interest. This method has been demonstrated to achieve up to 1,000-fold enrichment per round for sequences of interest.
3. High Throughput Nitrilase Activity Assay.
Activity assays were conducted using 25 mM (−3 mg/mL) substrate, 0.1 mg/mL nitrilase in 0.25 mL of assay solution. Assay solutions consisted of 0-10% (v/v) MeOH in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer solution at pH 7 to 9 and temperatures 37° C. or 22° C. Specific activities were measured at 5 min transformation time point, unless otherwise noted, and are expressed in units μmol mg−1 min−1. Enantiomeric excess and conversion rates were determined by high throughput HPLC analysis comparing enzyme product concentration to standard curves of racemic acid products. Analytical conditions for the products are tabulated below.
Analytical Methods:


















Liquid Chromatography
Retention Times of



Acid Product
Column
Method
enantiomers (min)




















1.1
mandelic acid
Chirabiotic R
20%[0.5% AcOH], 80% CH3CN
2.4 (S); 2.9 (R)




100 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min


1.2
2-Cl-mandelic acid
Chirabiotic R
20%[0.5% AcOH], 80% CH3CN
2.3 (S); 2.9 (R)




100 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min


1.3
2-Br-mandelic acid
Chirabiotic R
20%[0.5% AcOH], 80% CH3CN
2.8; 4.0




100 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min


1.4
2-CH3-mandelic acid
Chirabiotic R
20%[0.5% AcOH], 80% CH3CN
3.1; 3.8




100 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min


1.5
3-Cl-mandelic
Chirabiotic R
10%[0.5% AcOH], 90% CH3CN
3.1; 3.8




100 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min


1.6
3-Br-mandelic
Chirabiotic R
10%[0.5% AcOH], 90% CH3CN
3.3; 3.9




100 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min


1.7
4-F-mandelic
Chirabiotic R
20%[0.5% AcOH], 80% CH3CN
3.7; 4.8




150 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min


1.8
1-napthylglycolic acid
Chirabiotic R
4%[0.5% AcOH], 96% CH3CN
3.1; 3.7




100 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min


1.9
2-napthylglycolic acid
Chirabiotic R
4%[0.5% AcOH], 96% CH3CN
3.7; 4.7




100 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min


1.10
3-pyridylglycolic acid
Chirabiotic R
5%[0.5% AcOH], 65% H2O,
4.4; 5.5




100 × 4.6 mm
30% CH3CN, 2 ml/min


1.11
3-thienylglycolic acid
Chirabiotic R
20%[0.5% AcOH], 80% CH3CN
1.4; 2.5




100 × 4.6 mm
2 ml/min


2.1
phenyl lactic acid
Chirabiotic R
20%[0.5% AcOH], 80% CH3CN
2.8 (S); 4.0 (R)




150 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min


2.2
2-methylphenyl lactic
Chirabiotic R
20%[0.5% AcOH], 80% CH3CN
2.5; 2.8



acid
150 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min


2.3
2-bromophenyl lactic
Chirabiotic R
20%[0.5% AcOH], 80% CH3CN
2.8; 3.2



acid
150 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min


2.4
2-fluorophenyl lactic
Chirabiotic R
20%[0.5% AcOH], 80% CH3CN
2.6; 2.9



acid
150 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min


2.5
3-methylphenyl lactic
Chirabiotic R
20%[0.5% AcOH], 80% CH3CN
2.4; 3.2



acid
150 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min


2.6
3-fluorophenyl lactic
Chirabiotic R
20%[0.5% AcOH], 80% CH3CN
2.8; 3.6



acid
150 × 4.6mm
1 ml/min


2.7
1-napthyllactic acid
Chirabiotic R
20%[0.5% AcOH], 80% CH3CN
2.7; 3.1




150 × 4.6mm
1 ml/min


2.8
2-pyridyllactic acid
Chirabiotic R
20%[0.5% AcOH], 80% CH3CN
2.5; 2.9




150 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min


2.9
3-pyridyllactic acid
Chirabiotic R
20%[0.5% AcOH], 80% CH3CN
2.9; 3.6




150 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min


2.10
2-thienyllactic acid
Chirabiotic R
20%[0.5% AcOH], 80% CH3CN
3.6; 4.6




150 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min


2.11
3-thienyllactic acid
Chirabiotic R
20%[0.5% AcOH], 80% CH3CN
3.5; 4.6




150 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min



Methyl(3-O [benzoyl]-
Daicel OD
5% isopropanol, 95% hexane
4.5 (R); 5.4 (S)



4-cyano)-butanoate
 50 × 4.6 mm
1 ml/min









Cyanohydrin (Substrate) Synthesis:
Mandelonitrile Synthesis Method A: Acetone cyanohydrin (685 μL, 7.5 mmol), aldehyde (5 mmol), and catalytic DIEA (13 μL, 0.075 mmol) were mixed at 0° C. The reactions were stirred on ice for 45 minutes. To drive the equilibrium toward the product, acetone was removed in vacuo. Subsequently, crude reactions were acidified with H2SO4 (3 μL) and stored at −20° C. TLC was used to monitor reaction progress (3:1 hexane/ethylacetate (EtOAc).
Mandelonitrile Synthesis Method B: To a solution of KCN (358 mg, 5.5 mmol) in MeOH (1 mL) at 0° C. was added aldehyde (5 mmol) and acetic acid (315 μL, 5.5 mmol). After stiffing for one hour on ice, MeOH was removed in vacuo, and the crude mixture was partitioned using EtOAc and H2O. The organic fraction was retained and concentrated in vacuo. TLC analysis was used to monitor reaction progress (3:1 Hexanes/EtOAc).
Aryl Acetaldehyde Cyanohydrin: Arylacetic acid (50 mmol) was dissolved in 50 ml anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF) in a two-neck 500 ml round-bottom flask under N2(g) atmosphere. To this solution cooled to 0° C., under vigorous mixing, was added slowly 105 mmol of thexylchloroborane-dimethyl sulfide (2.55 M in methylene chloride). The reaction was allowed to proceed overnight. Excess acetic acid (10 ml) was added to quench and acidify the reaction followed by the addition 10 ml water. After stirring at room temperature for 1 hour, solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was dissolved in 100 ml water and extracted with 200 ml EtOAc. The EtOAc layer was dried over sodium sulfate, filtered and then concentrated in vacuo. Subsequently, 60 mmol of KCN, followed by 100 ml methanol was added to the residue. The solution was then cooled to 0° C. and acetic acid (60 mmol) added. The reaction was stirred for 1-2 hours after all KCN dissolved. Solvents were removed in vacuo and residue was dissolved in 100 ml water and 200 ml EtOAc. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc one more time. Combined EtOAc extracts were washed with saturated brine and dried over sodium sulfate, filtered and then concentrated in vacuo to obtain crude cyanohydrin product. The cyanohydrin was purified by silica-gel column (hexane/EtOAc), as necessary.
2-chloro mandelonitrile: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.69 (m, 1H), 7.41 (m, 1H), 7.36 (m, 2H), 5.84 (s, 1H), 3.07 (br, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 132.89, 132.73, 131.22, 130.19, 128.48, 127.84, 118.24, 60.87. MS calc'd for [C8H6ClNO] 167.01 found 167.9 (LC-MS+).
2-bromomandelonitrile: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.72 (d, 1H, J=6.58), 7.62 (d, 1H, J=8.35), 7.43 (t, 1H, J=8.42), 7.30 (t, 1H, J=7.00), 5.85 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 134.550, 133.584, 131.564, 128.819, 128.535, 122.565, 118.153, 63.379.
2-methylmandelonitrile: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ: 7.60 (d, 1H, J=7.4), 7.23-7.35 (m, 3H), 5.66 (s, 1H), 2.44 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 298 K, 125 MHz) δ: 136.425, 133.415, 131.450, 130.147, 127.204, 126.894, 118.952, 18.916. MS calc'd for [C9H9NO] 147.07, Found 147.2 (ESI+).
3-chloromandelonitrile: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.55 (s, 1H), 7.43-7.37 (m, 3H), 5.54 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 137.183, 135.480, 130.718, 130.303, 127.047, 124.891, 118.395, 63.156. MS calc'd for [C8H6ClNO] 167.01 found 167.9 (LC-MS+).
3-bromomandelonitrile: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.69 (s, 1H), 7.56 (d, J=6.2 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (d, J=5.5 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (t, J=6.4. Hz, 1H), 5.53 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 137.376, 133.201, 130.934, 129.208, 125.359, 123.380, 118.458, 63.006. MS calc'd for [C8H6BrNO] 212.0 found 211.9 (LC-MS+).
4-fluoromandelonitrile: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 5.54 (s, 1H), 7.13 (m, 2H), 7.51-7.53 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 63.02, 116.44, 118.97, 128.90, 131.54, 132.51, 162.575.
4-chloromandelonitrile: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.47 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.42 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 2H), 5.53 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 136.209, 133.845, 129.647, 128.232, 118.630, 63.154. MS calc'd for [C8H6ClNO] 167.01 found 167.9 (LC-MS+)
1-naphthyl cyanohydrin: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 8.14 (d, 1H, J=8.5), 7.92 (t, 2H, J=6.1), 7.82 (d, 1H, J=5.7), 7.62 (t, 1H, J=6.1), 7.56 (t, 1H, J=6.1), 7.50 (t, 1H, J=6.1), 6.18 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 137.0, 135.7, 134.2, 131.1, 129.2, 127.5, 126.7, 125.8, 125.3, 123.1, 119.0, 62.4; MS calc'd for [C12H9O] 183.21. Found 183.2 (ESI+).
2-naphthyl cyanohydrin: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 8.03 (s, 1H), 7.92 (d, 1H, J=8.6), 7.87-7.91 (m, 2H), 7.61 (dd, 1H, J=6.7, 1.2), 7.55-7.60 (m, 2H), 5.72 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 134.9, 133.9, 132.7, 129.6, 128.6, 128.0, 127.4, 127.2, 126.4, 123.9, 118.9, 64.1; MS calc'd for [C12H9O] 183.21. Found 183.2 (ESI+).
3-pyridyl cyanohydrin: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ: 8.62 (d, 1H, J=1.8), 8.57 (d, 1H, J=5.1), 7.94 (d, 1H, J=8.1), 7.41 (dd, 1H, J=8.1, 5.1), 5.64 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 149.921, 147.355, 135.412, 133.044, 124.443, 118.980, 61.085. MS calc'd for [C7H6N2O] 134.05. Found 135.2 (ESI+).
3-thienyl cyanohydrin: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.45 (d, J=2.2 Hz 1H), 7.56 (dd, J=6.2 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (d, J=5.5 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (t, J=6.4. Hz, 1H), 5.53 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 137.376, 133.201, 130.934, 129.208, 125.359, 123.380, 118.458, 63.006. MS calc'd for [C6H5NOS] 139.01 found 139.9 (LC-MS+).
phenyl acetaldehyde cyanohydrin: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.34 (m, 5H), 4.64 (t, J=6.75 Hz, 1H), 3.11 (d, J=6.75 Hz, 2H), 2.75 (br, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 133.96, 129.91, 129.16, 128.08, 119.47, 62.33, 41.55.
2-methylphenyl acetaldehyde cyanohydrin: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.11 (m, 4H), 4.61 (t, J=6.62 Hz, 1H), 3.12 (d, J=6.62 Hz, 2H), 2.14 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 136.94, 136.47, 132.57, 130.48, 127.61, 125.75, 120.11, 62.95, 44.73 MS calc'd for [C10H11NO]: 161.08. Found 162.2 (M+Na, ESI+)
2-bromophenyl acetaldehyde cyanohydrin: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.20 (m, 4H), 4.78 (t, J=6.5 Hz, 1H), 3.26 (d, J=6.5 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 133.93, 132.82, 131.72, 129.21, 128.12, 124.86, 119.41, 63.02, 44.89.
2-fluorophenyl acetaldehyde cyanohydrin: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.2 (m, 2H), 7.02 (m, 2H), 4.50 (dd, J=4.62 Hz, J=7.88 Hz, 1H), 3.23 (dd, J=4.62 Hz, 1 J=14.12 Hz, 1H), 2.97 (dd, 7.88 Hz, 14.12 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 132.18, 131.52, 129.66, 129.03, 128.07, 124.05, 115.8, 63.02, 44.79 MS calc'd for [C9H8FNO] 165.06. Found 164.2 (ESI+).
3-methylphenyl acetaldehyde cyanohydrin: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.18 (m, 1H), 7.02 (m, 3H), 4.54 (dd, J=4.62 Hz, J=8 Hz, 1H), 3.06 (dd, J=4.62 Hz, J=14.38 Hz, 1H), 2.83 (dd, J=8 Hz, J=14.38 Hz, 1H), 2.36 (s, 3H) 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 176.25, 138.18, 136.0, 130.97, 128.93, 127.68, 126.58, 76.42, 34.29, 37.69 MS calc'd for [C10H12O3] 180.08. Found 180.0 (ESI+).
3-fluorophenyl acetaldehyde cyanohydrin: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.18 (m, 2H), 6.95 (m, 2H), 4.44 (dd, 1H), 3.11 (dd, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 130.40, 125.53, 124.85, 116.92, 114.87, 114.50, 119.77, 61.97, 41.27.
1-napthyl acetaldehyde cyanohydrin: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 8.07 (m, 1H), 7.86 (m, 1H), 7.74 (m, 1H), 7.41 (m, 4H), 4.20 (t, J=7 Hz, 1H), 3.33 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 2H) 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 177.7, 140.31, 129.74, 129.24, 128.92, 128.26, 127.84, 125.63, 124.53, 124.05, 123.42, 70.58, 38.0 MS calc'd for [C13H11NO] 197.08. Found 197.1 (ESI+).
2-pyridyl acetaldehyde cyanohydrin: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 8.50 (m, 1H), 7.85 (m, 1H), 7.48 (m, 1H), 7.34 (m, 1H), 4.42 (m, 1H), 3.19 (dd, J=3.5 Hz, J=13.7 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 157.44, 145.69, 140.24, 126.96, 126.16, 122.99, 60.30, 42.60 MS calc'd for [C8H8N2O] 148.06. Found 149.1 (ESI+).
3-pyridyl acetaldehyde cyanohydrin: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 8.62 (d, 1H, J=1.8), 8.57 (d, 1H, J=5.1), 7.94 (d, 1H, J=8.1), 7.41 (dd, 1H, J=8.1, 5.1), 5.64 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ: 149.921, 147.355, 135.412, 133.044, 124.443, 118.980, 61.085. Exact Mass calculated for [C7H6N2O]: 134.05. Found: 135.2 (ESI+).
2-thienyl acetaldehyde cyanohydrin: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.1 (m, 1H), 6.9 (m, 1H), 6.8 (m, 1H), 4.11 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.86 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 127.68, 127.41, 125.58, 124.60, 118.70, 63.25, 44.84.
3-thienyl acetaldehyde cyanohydrin: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.09 (m, 3H), 4.60 (t, J=6.25 Hz, 1H), 3.12 (d, J=6.25 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 129.05, 127.16, 125.27, 122.65, 119.87, 61.58, 44.90.
Preparation of racemic mandelic acids standards from corresponding cyanohydrins: (Stoughton, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1941, 63, 2376) 2-bromomandelonitrile (230 mg, 1.08 mmol) was dissolved in conc. HCl (1 mL) and stirred at room temperature for 18 h and then at 70° C. for 24 h. After cooling, the reaction mixture was extracted with diethyl ether (4×2 mL). Organic extracts were, combined, dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. 2-bromomandelic acid was isolated as a colorless powder (180 mg, 0.78 mmol, 70% yield).
Preparation of racemic aryllactic acids standards from corresponding amino acids: Phenylalanine (10 mmol, 1.65 g) was dissolved in 30 ml 2N H2SO4 at room temperature under N2 (g) atmosphere. Sodium nitrite (1.4 g in 3 ml aqueous solution, 2 eq) solution was added slowly to the reaction mixture over a period of 3-4 hours with vigorous stirring at room temperature under N2 (g) atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight and the phenyllactic acid product was then extracted into diethylether (3×30 ml). Combined ether extracts were dried over MgSO4 and then filtered and concentrated in vacuo. (Kenji, I.; Susumu, A.; Masaru, M.; Yasuyoshi, U.; Koki, Y.; Koichi, K. Patent Number, WO0155074, Publication date: 2001-08-02.)
General Method for Enzymatic Preparation of α-Hydroxy Acids:
(R)-(−)-Mandelic Acid To a solution of mandelonitrile (1.005 g, 7.56 mmol) in 150 mL of sodium phosphate (100 mM) buffer at pH 8 with 10% v/v methanol, that had been N2 (g) sparged, at 37° C., was added 9 mg of nitrilase 1 (normalized for nitrilase content). The reaction was conducted under N2 (g) atmosphere on a rotating platform shaker. Reaction progress was monitored by withdrawing aliquots for HPLC analysis. After 3 h incubation, the reaction mixture was acidified to pH 2 with 1 N HCl and extracted with diethyl ether (4×50 ml). Organic fractions were concentrated in vacuo and then the residue was taken up in 10% sodium bicarbonate solution. This aqueous solutions was then washed with diethyl ether (3×50 ml) and then acidified to pH 2 with 1 N HCl and extracted with diethyl ether (3×50 ml). Organic fractions were combined, washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered and then concentrated in vacuo. (R)-(−)-Mandelic acid (933 mg, 6.22 mmol) was isolated as a colorless powder in 86% yield. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 12.6 (br, s, 1H) 7.41 (m, 2H), 7.34 (m, 2H), 7.28 (m, 1H), 5.015 (s, 1H). 13C NMR DMSO-d6, 125 MHz) δ 174.083, 140.216, 128.113, 127.628, 126.628, 72.359. MS calc'd for [C8H8O3] 150.07. Found 150.9 (ESI+); ee=98% [HPLC]. [α]20598=−134.6 (c=0.5, methanol).
(−)-2-chloromandelic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 7.75 (m, 1H), 7.44 (m, 1H), 7.34 (m, 2H), 5.34 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 173.070, 137.985, 132.105, 129.399, 129.158, 128.705, 127.235. MS calc'd for [C8H7ClO3] 186.0. Found 185.0 (LC-MS−). ee=96% [HPLC]. 92% yield. [α]20598=−137.6 (c=0.5, ethanol).
(−)-2-bromomandelic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 7.60 (d, J=7.93, 1H), 7.48 (m, 1H), 7.40 (m, 1H), 7.25 (m, 1H), 5.30 (s, 1H). 13C NMR DMSO-d6, 125 MHz) δ 172.994, 139.61, 132.355, 129.652, 128.753, 127.752, 122.681, 71.644. MS calc'd for [C8H7BrO3] 230.0. Found 230.9. ee=96% [HPLC]. 92% yield. [α]20598=−116.4 (c=0.5, ethanol).
(−)-2-methylmandelic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 11.78 (bs, 1H) 7.38 (m, 1H), 7.16-7.38 (m, 3H), 5.18 (s, 1H), 2.35 (s, 3H). 13C NMR DMSO-d6, 125 MHz) δ 174.229, 138.623, 135.649, 130.129, 127.491, 126.990, 125.698, 125.698, 69.733, 18.899. MS calc'd for [C9H10O3] 166.1. Found 165.2. ee=91% [HPLC]. 86% yield. [α]20598=−164.4 (c=0.5, ethanol).
(−)-3-chloromandelic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 7.46 (s, 1H), 7.36 (m, 3H), 5.07 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 173.554, 142.685, 132.813, 130.069, 127.568, 126.355, 125.289, 71.659. MS calc'd for [C8H7ClO3] 186.0. Found 185.34 (MALDI TOF−). ee=98% [HPLC]. 70% yield. [α]20598=−120.4 8 (c=0.5, methanol).
(−)-3-bromomandelic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 7.60 (s, 1H), 7.49 (m, 1H), 7.42 (m, 1H), 7.31 (m, 1H), 5.06 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 173.551, 142.917, 130.468, 130.379, 129.237, 125.687, 121.404, 71.605. MS calc'd for [C8H7BrO3] 229.98. Found 229.1 (LC-MS). ee=98% [HPLC]. 82% yield. [α]20598=−84.8 (c=0.5, ethanol).
(−)-4-fluoromandelic acid 1H NMR (DMSO, 298K, 500 MHz) δ 12.65 (s, 1H), 7.44 (m, 2H), 7.17 (m, 2H), 5.91 (s, 1H), 5.03 (s, 1H) 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 173.93, 162.57, 136.47, 128.61, 128.55, 114.96, 114.80, 71.61. MS calc'd for [C8H7FO3] 170.0. Found 168.8. ee=99% [HPLC]. 81% yield. [α]20598=−152.8 (c=0.5, methanol).
(−)-1-naphthylglycolic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 8.28-8.26 (m, 1H), 7.87-7.93 (m, 2H), 7.47-7.58 (m, 4H), 5.66 (s, 1H). 13C NMR DMSO-d6, 125 MHz) δ 174.288, 136.284, 133.423, 130.654, 128.353, 128.192, 125.926, 125.694, 125.613, 125.266, 124.558, 70.940. MS calc'd for [C12H10O3]: 202.21 found 201.37 (MALDI TOF−). ee=95% [HPLC]. 90% yield [α]20598=−115.4 (c=0.5, ethanol).
(−)-2-naphthylglycolic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 12.6 (bm, 1H), 7.88-7.93 (m, 4H), 7.48-7.56 (m, 3H), 5.20 (s, 1H). 13C NMR DMSO-d6, 125 MHz) δ 174.005, 137.760, 132.644, 132.498, 127.811, 127.658, 127.506, 127.209, 125.993, 125.334, 124.761, 72.472. MS calc'd for [C12H10O3] 202.21. Found 201.37 (MALDI TOF). ee=98% [HPLC]. 68% yield. [α]20598=−115.4 (c=0.5, ethanol).
(−)-3-pyridylglycolic acid This Reaction was performed in 100 mM ammonium formate buffer at pH 8. To isolate the product, the reaction mixture was filtered through a 10,000 MWCO membrane to remove enzyme and then concentrated in vacuo. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 8.56 (s, 1H), 8.36 (d, J=4.57 Hz, 1H), 8.25 (s, 1H), 7.71 (m, 1H), 7.25 (dd, J=4.98, 4.80 Hz 1H), 5.45 (s, 1H). 13C NMR DMSO-d6, 125 MHz) δ 165.911, 147.862, 147.251, 139.118, 133.381, 122.746, 71.508. MS calc'd for [C7H7NO3] 153.04. Found 154.0 ((MALDI TOF). ee=92% [HPLC], 84% yield, [α]20598=−65.2 (c=0.5, H2O).
(−)-3-thienylglycolic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 7.48 (m, 1H), 7.45 (d, J=2.81, 1H,), 7.10 (m, 1H), 5.09 (s, 1H), 3.33 (s, 1H) 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 173.704, 141.109, 126.446, 126.042, 122.247, 68.915 MS calc'd for [C6H6O3S] 158.00. Found 157.224 (MALDI TOF). ee=95% [HPLC]. 70% yield. [α]20598=−123.2 8 (c=0.5, methanol).
(S)-(−)-phenyllactic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 7.28 (m, 5H), 4.17 (dd, J=4.5 Hz, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 2.98 (dd, J=4.5 Hz, J=13.7 Hz, 1H), 2.79 (dd, J=8.3 Hz, J=13.7 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 178.16, 133.4, 129.27, 128.6, 127.3, 70.45, 44.12. ee=97% [HPLC], 84% yield. [α]20598=−17.8 (c=0.5, methanol).
(−)-2-methylphenyllactic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 7.16 (m, 4H), 4.47 (dd, J=3.9 Hz, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 3.25 (dd, J=3.9 Hz, 14.3 Hz, 1H), 2.94 (dd, J=8.8 Hz, J=14.3 Hz), 2.35 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 178.61, 137.08, 134.74, 130.80, 130.25, 127.44, 126.34, 70.93, 37.67, 19.79. MS calc'd [C10H12O3] 180.08. Found 180.0 (ESI+). 86% yield. ee=95% [HPLC]. [α]20598=−13.2 (c=0.5, methanol).
(−)-2-bromophenyllactic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 7.28 (m, 4H), 4.60 (dd, J=4.0 Hz, J=9.1 Hz, 1H), 3.45 (dd, J=4.0 Hz, J=14.1 Hz, 1H), 3.04 (dd, J=8.0 Hz, J=14.1 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 178.70, 136.05, 133.21, 132.10, 128.99, 127.72, 125.0, 70.04, 40.76. MS calc'd for [C9H9BrO3] 243.9. Found 243.3 (ESI+). 91% yield. ee=93% [HPLC], [α]20598=−17.6 (c=0.5, methanol)
(−)-2-fluorophenyllactic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 7.10 (m, 4H), 4.64 (t, J=6.8 Hz, 1H), 3.11 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 132.18, 131.52, 129.66, 129.03, 128.07, 124.05, 115.8, 63.02, 44.79. MS calc'd for [C9H8FNO]: 165.06. Found 164.2 (ESI+). 91% yield. ee=88% [HPLC]. [α]20598=−14.0 (c=0.5, methanol).
(−)-3-methylphenyllactic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 7.18 (m, 1H), 7.02 (m, 3H), 4.54 (dd, J=4.6 Hz, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.06 (dd, J=4.54 Hz, J=14.4 Hz, 1H), 2.83 (dd, J=8.0 Hz, J=14.4 Hz, 1H), 2.36 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 175.88, 163.80, 130.33, 130.09, 125.7, 116.68, 113.75, 71.31, 34.28. MS calc'd for [C10H11NO] 161.08. Found 162.2 (ESI+). 80% yield. ee=98% [HPLC]. [α]20598=−2.4 (c=0.5, methanol).
(−)-3-fluorophenyllactic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 7.2 (m, 1H), 6.9 (m, 3H), 4.56 (dd, 4.5 Hz, J=7.9 Hz, 1H), 3.09 (dd, J=4.5 Hz, J=14.1 Hz, 1H), 2.86 (dd, J=7.9 Hz, J=14.1 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 175.88, 163.80, 130.33, 130.09, 125.7, 116.68, 113.75, 71.31, 34.28. MS calc'd for [C9H9O3F] 184.05. Found 184.1 (ESI+). 82% yield. ee=97% [HPLC]. [α]20598=−5.2 (c=0.5, methanol).
(−)-1-napthyllactic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 8.57 (m, 1H), 8.21 (m, 1H), 8.08 (m, 1H), 7.61 (m, 4H), 4.64 (dd, 3.5 Hz, 8.5 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (dd, J=3.5 Hz, J=14.5 Hz, 1H), 3.38 (dd, J=8.5 Hz, J=14.5 Hz, 1H) 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 177.7, 140.31, 129.74, 129.24, 128.92, 128.26, 127.84, 125.63, 124.53, 124.05, 123.42, 70.58, 38.0. MS calc'd for [C13H11NO] 197.08. Found 197.1 (ESI+). 87% yield. ee=94% [HPLC]. [α]20598=−16.2 (c=0.5, methanol).
(−)-2-pyridyllactic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 8.49 (m, 1H), 7.62 (m, 1H), 7.21 (m, 2H), 4.50 (t, J=5.0 Hz, 1H), 3.01 (d, J=5.0 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 178.8, 159.79, 148.84, 136.89, 124.35, 121.75, 71.14, 44.09. MS calc'd for [C8H9NO3]: 167.06. Found 167.0. (ESI+). 62% yield. ee=94% [HPLC], [α]20598=−3.6 (c=0.5, methanol).
(−)-3-pyridyllactic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 8.43 (m, 2H), 7.62 (m, 1H), 7.28 (m, 1H), 4.57 (t, 5.37 Hz, 1H), 2.85 (d, 5.37 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 176.6, 150.03, 147.12, 136.41, 129.45, 123.26, 61.56, 31.46 MS calc'd for [C8H9NO3] 167.06. Found 167.0 (ESI+). 59% yield. ee=94% [HPLC]. [α]20598=−4.0 (c=0.5, methanol).
(−)-2-thienyllactic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 7.18 (m, 1H), 6.94 (m, 1H), 6.90 (m, 1H), 4.49 (dd, J=4.1 Hz, J=6.25 Hz, 1H), 3.36 (dd, J=4.1 Hz, J=15.0 Hz, 1H), 3.26 (dd, J=6.25 Hz, J=15.0 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 127.68, 127.41, 125.58, 124.60, 118.70, 63.25, 44.84. MS calc'd for [C7H7NOS] 153.02. Found 153.0 (ESI+). 85% yield. ee=95% [HPLC]. [α]20598=−13.0 (c=0.5, methanol).
(−)-3-thienyllactic acid 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 7.30 (m, 1H), 7.13 (m, 1H), 7.01 (m, 1H), 4.50 (dd, J=4.25 Hz, J=6.5 Hz, 1H), 3.21 (dd, J=4.25 Hz, J=15.0 Hz, 1H), 3.10 (dd, J=6.5 Hz, J=15.0 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 127.50, 136.09, 128.83, 126.24, 123.32, 70.65, 34.84. MS calc'd for [C7H8O3S] 172.02. Found 172.1 (ESI+). 81% yield. ee=96% [HPLC]. [α]20598=−18.8 (c=0.5, methanol).
Enzymic Hydrolysis of 3-Hydroxyglutarylnitrile:
3-Hydroxyglutarylnitrile (1.0 g, 9.0 mmol, 240 mM) was suspended in N2 (g) sparged sodium phosphate buffer (37.5 mL, pH 7, 100 mM) at room temperature. Cell lysate (30 mg, normalized for nitrilase content) was added to bring the concentration to 0.8 mg/ml enzyme and the reaction was at shaken at 100 rpm, room temperature. Reaction progress was monitored by TLC (1:1 EtOAc:Hexanes, Rf=0.32, nitrile; Rf=0.0, acid) After 22 h, the reaction was acidified with 1M HCl. The reaction mixture was continuously extracted with diethyl ether. The acid product was isolated as a yellow oil (1.15 g, 98% yield). 1H NMR (DMSO, 298K, 500 MHz) δ 12.32 (s, 1H), 5.52 (s, 1H), 4.10 (m, 1H), 2.70 (dd, 1H, J=16.8, 4.1 Hz), 2.61 (dd, 1H, J=16.9, 6.3 Hz), 2.44 (dd, 1H, J=15.4, 5.3 Hz), 2.37 (dd, 1H, J=15.6, 7.8 Hz). 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 171.9, 118.7, 63.4, 41.2, 25.2 MS calc'd for [C5H7NO3]: 129.0. Found 130.0 [M+H+], (ESI+).
Preparation of (R)-(−)-Methyl (3-O-[benzoyl]-4-cyano)-butanoate
Benzoyl chloride (0.068 ml, 0.752 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of (R)-methyl-(3-hydroxy-4-cyano)-butanoate (71.7 mg, 0.501 mmol) in pyridine (2.0 ml), at room temperature. After 19 hours, add an additional 0.5 equivalent of benzoyl chloride (0.023 ml, 0.251 mmol). Reaction was complete at 23 h, as determined by TLC. Add 1 ml H2O, extract with ether (3×10 ml). Wash with brine (2×10 ml). Dry combined aqueous extracts with MgSO4. Filter off drying agent and remove solvent by rotary evaporation. Purify by column chromatography (hexane:ethyl acetate [2:1]. Rotary evaporation of fractions yielded the product as a yellow oil (46 mg, 0.186 mmol, 37%). 1H NMR (DMSO, 298K, 500 MHz) δ 7.96 (d, 2H, J=7.8), 7.70 (t, 1H, J=7.25), 7.56 (t, 2H, J=7.8), 5.55 (m, 1H), 3.59 (s, 3H), 3.13 (m, 2H), 2.90 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 169.6, 164.5, 133.8, 129.3, 128.9, 128.5, 117.3, 66.0, 51.8, 37.5, 22.2 MS calc'd for [C13H13NO4]: 247.25. Found 270.3 [M+Na+] ee=95% [HPLC]. [α]20598 −32.4 (c=0.5, CHCl3).
Synthesis of (R)-Ethyl-(3-hydroxy-4-cyano)-butanoate
A 0.2 M solution of (R)-3-hydroxy-4-cyano-butanoic acid (50 mg, 0.387 mmol) in anhydrous ethanol (1.94 mL) was prepared. The ethanol solution was added dropwise to 1.0 ml of a 50:50 (v/v) mixture of anhydrous 1 M HCl ethereal solution and anhydrous ethanol over sieves. The reaction was stirred overnight at room temperature under N2 (g) atmosphere. The reaction was monitored by TLC, (1:1 EtOAc:Hexanes, Rf=0.45, ester; Rf=0.0, acid, stained with p-anisaldehyde). After 30 hrs, solvent was removed by rotary evaporation. The crude product was taken up in 25 mL ether, washed with 5 mL saturated bicarbonate and then 5 mL brine. The organic extract was dried over MgSO4, filtered and then concentrated in vacuo, yielding the product as a clear oil. 1H NMR (DMSO, 298K, 500 MHz) δ 5.60 (d, 1H, J=5.58 Hz), 4.12 (m, 1H), 4.07 (q, 2H, J=7.1), 2.66 (m, 2H), 2.47 (m, 2H), 1.87 (t, 3H, J=7.0). 13C NMR (DMSO, 298K, 125 MHz) δ 170.21, 118.60, 63.40, 59.98, 41.10, 25.14, 14.02. MS calc'd for [C7H11NO3]: 157.1. Found 158.2. [M+H+]
EXAMPLE 13
Optimization of Nitrilases for the Enantioselective Production of (R)-2-Chloromandelic Acid
Chloromandelic acid has the structure:




Nitrilases were identified which selectively produced (R)-2-chloromandelic acid from (R,S)-2-chloromandelonitrile. Nitrilases were identified which were useful to improve the enantioselectivity of the enzymes and establishing the effects of process conditions on the enzymes. An examination of the reaction conditions for the enzymatic nitrile hydrolysis was carried out in order to improve the enantiomeric excess of the product. Additionally, further investigation into the effects of process conditions on the enzyme was performed.




In this embodiment, the enantioselective production of (R)-2-chloromandelic acid was the target. One enzyme, SEQ ID NOS:385, 386, was selected for further confirmation of its enantioselectivity on 2-chloromandelonitrile. SEQ ID NOS:385, 386 was shown to be stable to process components, with a half-life of 8 hours. The enzyme was inhibited by 2-chlorobenzaldehyde and a contaminant in the cyanohydrin substrate, 2-chlorobenzoic acid. The enzymatic reaction was scaled up to a substrate concentration of 45 mM 2-chloromandelonitrile. Over 90% conversion was obtained, with ee of 97%. The chiral HPLC method was improved, to remove a contaminating peak that was present in the substrate. Improved accuracy in the determination of enantioselectivity was obtained using this method.
Nitrilases were screened against 2-chloromandelonitrile, with 31 nitrilases exhibiting activity on this substrate. High enantioselectivities were shown by 9 enzymes. The optimization of 5 of these enzymes was undertaken and one of them was identified as a candidate for the next stage of development.
In an effort to improve the enantioselectivity of the selected enzymes for (R)-2-chloromandelic acid, a number of factors that are known to affect this property, together with the activity of the enzymes, were investigated. These included pH, temperature, buffer strength and addition of solvents to the reaction. Initially, 5 nitrilases were selected for these studies, based on the high enantioselectivities obtained by these enzymes. These enzymes were: SEQ ID NOS:385, 386, SEQ ID NOS:197, 198, SEQ ID NOS:217, 218, SEQ ID NOS:55, 56, and SEQ ID NOS:167, 168.
Effect of pH
The enzymatic reactions were run at a range of pH values, from pH 5 to pH 9. An increase in both activity and enantioselectivity with increasing pH was observed for all of the enzymes. With the exception of SEQ ID NOS:385, 386, pH 9 (0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer) was determined as the optimum for activity and enantioselectivity. The optimum pH for SEQ ID NOS:385, 386 was pH 8 (0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer).
Effect of Temperature
The enzymes exhibited similar temperature profiles, with the highest activities being measured at 37° C. and 45° C. Although the latter temperature resulted in higher conversions, the enantioselectivity of most of the enzymes showed a clear preference for the lower temperatures, with ee values being 10-20% lower when the temperature was raised above 37° C. In the case of SEQ ID NOS:385, 386 a slight optimum for enantioselectivity was evident at 37° C. Therefore, this temperature was established as the optimum for hydrolysis of 2-chloromandelonitrile by these enzymes.
Effect of Enzyme Concentration
During the concurrent investigation into the enantioselective hydrolysis of phenylacetaldehyde cyanohydrin to L-phenyllactic acid, the concentration of the enzyme in the reaction was found to have a significant effect on the enantioselectivity of the reaction. This provided an indication that the enzymatic hydrolysis rate was faster than the rate of racemization of the remaining cyanohydrin in the reaction. On this basis, the effect of enzyme concentration on the enantioselectivity of the enzymes towards (R)-2-chloromandelonitrile was investigated. Enzymatic reactions were performed with the standard concentration of enzyme (0.6 mg protein/ml), half the standard concentration and one-tenth of the standard concentration.
The following Table indicates the highest conversions achieved for the reactions, with the corresponding ee. With the exception of SEQ ID NOS:385, 386, it appears that very little, if any, increased enantioselectivity is observed. Therefore, it appears that the rate of racemization of the remaining chloromandelonitrile is not a limiting factor to obtaining higher enantioselectivities.
Effect of enzyme concentration on the activity and enantioselectivity of nitrilases for the production of (R)-2-chloromandelic acid.















Enzyme conc
Conversion
Time for




(mg protein/
to
highest


Enzyme
ml)
product (%)
conversion (h)
ee (%)



















SEQ ID
0.06
67
3
92


NOS: 385,
0.3
80
1
82


386
0.6
81
1
82


SEQ ID
0.06
3
5
100


NOS: 197,
0.3
46
4
88


198
0.6
75
3
86


SEQ ID
0.06
82
4
88


NOS: 189,
0.3
80
1
86


190
0.6
76
0.5
82


SEQ ID
0.06
22
5
ND


NOS: 217,
0.3
73
4
82


218
0.6
72
1.5
81


SEQ ID
0.06
81
5
84


NOS: 55,
0.3
73
2
79


56
0.6
67
0.5
76


SEQ ID
0.06
61
2
81


NOS: 167,
0.3
74
1.5
80


168
0.6
74
2
78









Investigation of Other Positive Enzymes
In addition to the enzymes in the above Table, a number of other nitrilases were screened for their enantioselectivities on 2-chloromandelonitrile. Some of these enzymes were newly discovered enzymes. Some were reinvestigated under conditions that have since been found to be optimal for these enzymes (pH 8 and 37° C.). The results of this screening are shown below in the Table.
Summary of enzymes screened for activity and enantioselectivity on 2-chloromandelonitrile














Conversion to
Time for highest
ee


Enzyme
product (%)
conversion (h)
(%)


















SEQ ID NOS: 383, 384
61
6
78


SEQ ID NOS: 101, 102
58
3
53


SEQ ID NOS: 97, 98
46
3
87


SEQ ID NOS: 13, 14
70
3
71


SEQ ID NOS: 5, 6
>95
3
67


SEQ ID NOS: 85, 86
50
4
52


SEQ ID NOS: 279, 280
>95
1
37


SEQ ID NOS: 33, 34
>95
3
60


SEQ ID NOS: 261, 262
>95
3
70









Effect of Co-Solvent Concentration
The addition of methanol as a cosolvent in the enzymatic reactions was shown to enhance the ee. In order to establish the lowest level of methanol that could be added to the reactions, the enzyme reactions were performed at varying concentrations of methanol, ranging from 0-20% (v/v). No significant differences in enantioselectivity were evident between the various methanol concentrations. However, the ee in these reactions was 97-98%, while that of the control reaction, with no added methanol was 95-96%. While this difference in ee is small, the effect of the methanol was shown in more than one set of experiments during the course of this investigation and is therefore regarded as significant.
Effect of Reaction Components on Activity of SEQ ID NOS:385, 386
A vital part of an investigation into process optimization of an enzyme involves the determination of the effects of any compounds which could be present in the enzymatic reaction. For SEQ ID NOS:385, 386, these components were established as the starting material and equilibrium product of the cyanohydrin, 2-chlorobenzaldehyde; the product, 2-chloromandelic acid and the contaminant detected in the substrate, 2-chlorobenzoic acid. The addition of cyanide to the reaction was found to have no effect on the enzyme activity. The presence of trace amounts of triethylamine was also found to be tolerable to the enzyme.
The effect of the various reaction components on the activity of SEQ ID NOS:385, 386 was assessed by addition of various levels of possible inhibitors to the enzyme reaction. From these experiments, it appeared that both the aldehyde and its oxidation product, 2-chlorobenzoic acid were detrimental to enzyme activity. Approximately 70% and 40% of the activity of SEQ ID NOS:385, 386 was lost upon addition of 5 mM 2-chlorobenzaldehyde or 5 mM 2-chlorobenzoic acid to the reaction, respectively.
Scale-Up Hydrolysis of 2-Chloromandelonitrile
In order to confirm the conversion and enantioselectivity obtained by SEQ ID NOS:385, 386 for the production of (R)-2-chloromandelic acid, a larger scale reaction was performed and the product isolated from the aqueous mixture. The reaction was performed in a 20 ml reaction volume, with a substrate concentration of 45 mM 2-chloromandelonitrile. Complete conversion of the cyanohydrin was obtained, with 30 mM product formed. The ee of the product was 97% and the specific activity of the enzyme was 0.13 mmol product/mg nitrilase/h.
It is evident from this experiment, together with the other experiments performed, that the formation of product does not account for the complete loss of substrate. In all experiments, a nitrile-containing control sample was run, in order to determine the extent of breakdown of the cyanohydrin. Overall, it appears that approximately 50% of the substrate is lost over a period of 4 hours at 37° C. It is expected that this breakdown would be to its equilibrium products, cyanide and 2-chlorobenzaldehyde, which could undergo further oxidation. A larger scale reaction was also run at a substrate concentration of 90 mM 2-chloromandelonitrile. However, no product was detected in this reaction. At higher substrate concentrations, it is expected that the concentration of the equilibrium product, 2-chlorobenzaldehyde and the contaminant, 2-chlorobenzoic acid will be present in higher amounts. Based on the results above, it is possible that the enzyme will be completely inhibited under such conditions.
Reactions Under Biphasic Conditions
The use of biphasic systems can facilitate product recovery following the enzymatic reaction step. These systems can be also be used for the removal of products or by-products which are inhibitory to the enzyme. The nitrilases were shown to be active under biphasic conditions using a variety of solvents. Following the low conversions obtained at the higher substrate concentration above, further investigation of a biphasic system was performed with the hit enzyme, SEQ ID NOS:385, 386. It was important to ascertain whether any inhibitory factors could be removed by the solvent phase and whether any process advantages could be gained by the use of a biphasic system.
Promising results were obtained with hexane as the organic phase. Therefore, further investigations involved the use of this solvent at two different levels: 100% and 70% of the volume of the aqueous phase, with increasing substrate concentrations, up to 90 mM. The substrate was dissolved in the organic phase. The level of hexane did not appear to affect the level of product formation, particularly at the higher concentrations of 2-chloromandelonitrile.
Once again, high conversion was observed in a biphasic system, with a 76% yield of product being observed after 5 hours. The rate of product formation appeared to be slightly lower than in the corresponding monophasic system, where the reaction is complete within 1 hour. Lower enantioselectivity was observed in the biphasic system. Some possibilities which may account for these results are (i) the mass transfer rate is lower than the rate of enzyme activity or (ii) the non-polar solvent directly affects the enzyme.
At a higher substrate concentration, a very low conversion was observed, with 7 mM 2-chloromandelic acid being formed from 90 mM 2-chloromandelonitrile. This level of conversion, albeit low, was higher than that observed in the monophasic system with the same substrate concentration. These results suggest that some of the inhibitory 2-chlorobenzaldehyde or 2-chlorobenzoic acid is retained in the non-polar organic solvent.
Standard Assay Conditions:
The following solutions were prepared:

    
    
        Substrate stock solution: 50 mM of the cyanohydrin substrate in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 8).
        Enzyme stock solution: 3.33 ml of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 8) to each vial of 20 mg of lyophilized cell lysate (final concentration 6 mg protein/ml)
    
    


The reaction volumes varied between the different experiments, depending on the number of time points taken. Unless otherwise noted, all reactions consisted of 25 mM 2-chloromandelonitrile and 10% (v/v) of the enzyme stock solution (final concentration 0.6 mg protein/ml). The reactions were run at 37° C., unless otherwise stated. Controls to monitor the nitrile degradation were run with every experiment. These consisted of 25 mM 2-chloromandelonitrile in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 8).
Sampling of reactions: The reactions were sampled by removing an aliquot from each reaction and diluting these samples by a factor of 8. Duplicate samples were taken for analysis by chiral and achiral HPLC methods. The reactions were sampled at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 4 hours, unless otherwise shown in the figures above.
HPLC Methods
The achiral HPLC method was run on a SYNERGI-RPTM column (4 μm; 50×2 mm) with a mobile phase of 10 mM Na phosphate buffer (pH 2.5). A gradient of methanol was introduced at 3.5 min and increased to 50% over 1.5 min, following which the methanol was decreased to 0%. Elution times for 2-chloromandelic acid and 2-chloromandelonitrile were 2.5 and 6.1 minutes, with another peak appearing with the nitrile at 5.9 minutes.
As described above, the chiral HPLC method was optimized during the course of the investigation, to improve the separation between 2-chlorobenzoic acid and (S)-2-chloromandelic acid. The optimized method was used during the latter half of the investigation and was run on a CHIROBIOTIC-RTM column. The mobile phase was 80% Acetonitrile: 20% of 0.5% (v/v) acetic acid. Elution times for (S)-2-chloromandelic acid and (R)-2-chloromandelic acid were 2.4 and 3.5 minutes respectively. A peak for 2-chlorobenzoic acid eluted at 1.9 minutes. For each experiment, a standard curve of the product was included in the HPLC run. The concentration of product in the samples was calculated from the slope of these curves.
Effect of pH
The effect of pH on the enzyme activity and enantioselectivity was studied by performance of the standard assay in a range of different buffers: 0.1 M Citrate Phosphate pH 5; 0.1 M Citrate Phosphate pH 6; 0.1 M Sodium Phosphate pH 6; 0.1 M Sodium Phosphate pH 7; 0.1 M Sodium Phosphate pH 8; 0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 8; and 0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 9. The standard enzyme concentration was used for all enzymes, with the exception of SEQ ID NOS:385, 386, where half the standard concentration was used (5% v/v of the enzyme stock solution).
Effect of Temperature
The effect of temperature on the activity and enantioselectivity was investigated by performing the standard assay at a range of different temperatures: room temperature, 37° C., 45° C., 50° C. and 60° C. The standard enzyme concentration was used for all enzymes, with the exception of SEQ ID NOS:385, 386, where half the standard concentration was used (5% v/v of the enzyme stock solution).
Effect of Enzyme Concentration
Reactions were run under standard conditions, with varying enzyme concentrations: 1%, 5% and 10% (v/v) of the enzyme stock solution. The reaction volume was normalized with the appropriate buffer.
Addition of Solvents
The enzyme reactions were performed in the presence of methanol as a cosolvent. Methanol was added to the standard reaction mixture at the following levels: 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20% (v/v).
Biphasic reactions with hexane were also investigated. The aqueous phase contained 10% (v/v) of the enzyme stock solution in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 8). The cyanohydrin was dissolved in the hexane, prior to addition to the reaction. Two levels of organic phase were used: 1 equivalent and 0.7 equivalents of the aqueous phase volume. In addition, a range of nitrile concentrations was investigated: 25, 45 and 90 mM. These reactions were run at room temperature.
Samples from these reactions were taken both from the aqueous and the solvent phase. The hexane was evaporated by centrifugation under vacuum and redissolved in a 50:50 mixture of methanol and water, so that the samples were at the same dilution as the aqueous samples. Analysis of the samples was performed by non-chiral and chiral HPLC.
Effect of Process Components
(i) Activity: The effect of the process components on the activity of the enzymes was established by addition of the individual components, 2-chlorobenzaldehyde, 2-chlorobenzoic acid or 2-chloromandelic acid, to the enzymatic reaction. The enzymatic reactions were carried out under standard conditions, in the presence of one of the 2 possible inhibitors as follows: 5, 10, 20 and 25 mM 2-chlorobenzaldehyde; 1.5 and 5 mM 2-chlorobenzoic acid; and 10, 20, 40 and 80 mM 2-chloromandelic acid. Control reactions were performed under standard conditions, with no additive. At each of the sampling times, the samples were diluted to a level of 1 in 10. Control samples containing the reaction components without enzyme were used and diluted to the same level. The samples were analysed by non-chiral HPLC.
(ii) Stability: The stability of the enzymes to process conditions was monitored by incubation of the enzymes in the presence of the reaction components, 2-chlorobenzaldehyde and 2-chloromandelic acid for predetermined time periods, prior to assay of the enzyme activity under standard conditions. In these experiments, the enzymes were incubated at a concentration of 3 mg protein/ml in the presence of each of the following reaction components: 5, 10, 20 and 25 mM 2-chlorobenzaldehyde; and 10, 20, 40 and 80 mM 2-chloromandelic acid. Control reactions were performed by incubation of the enzyme in buffer only.
Assay conditions: At 0, 4, 8 and 24 hours of incubation in the particular additive, 20 μl of the enzyme solution was removed and added to 60 μl of a 41.6 mM substrate stock solution and 20 μl buffer. The enzyme activity was thus assayed under standard conditions. The reactions were sampled 90 minutes after substrate addition and analyzed using the non-chiral HPLC method.
Scale-Up of Enzymatic Reaction
The enzymatic reactions were run at two difference concentrations: 45 mM and 90 mM substrate. The reactions were run under standard conditions, i.e. pH 8 (0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer), 37° C. and 10% (v/v) of the enzyme stock solution. The substrate was dissolved in 10% (v/v/) methanol prior to addition of the buffer. The final reaction volume was 20 ml and the reactions were performed with magnetic stiffing.
EXAMPLE 14
Optimization of Nitrilases for the Enantioselective Production of L-2-Amino-6,6-Dimethoxyhexanoic Acid




Four of the isolated enzymes were shown to hydrolyze 2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanenitrile to (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid, with selectivity towards the L-enantiomer. A new target, with a similar structure to (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid was identified. A panel of the isolated nitrilases are screened against the target, 5,5-dimethoxypentanal aminonitrile. The positive enzymes are characterized on this substrate. Laboratory evolution techniques can be used to optimize these nitrilases for improved enantiospecificity towards the specified target. A primary screen is used to identify putative up-mutants, which is confirmed using HPLC.
Optimization of enzymes: GSSMTM and GeneReassemblyTM can be performed on selected nitrilases, in order to improve the enantioselectivity and activity of the enzymes for the production of L-2-amino-6,6-dimethoxyhexanoic acid. Four enzymes were identified that can hydrolyze enantioselectively 2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanenitrile to L-(S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid. However, a slight structural difference is present in the new target molecule, L-2-amino-6,6-dimethoxyhexanoic acid. In order to determine whether this difference affects the activity and enantioselectivity of the enzymes, the complete spectrum of nitrilases is screened against the new target.
An enzyme exhibiting the highest combination of activity and enantioselectivity for the production of L-2-amino-6,6-dimethoxyhexanoic is selected for GSSMTM. Following the mutation of the target enzyme, the resulting mutants will be screened on 5,5-dimethoxypentanal aminonitrile, using high throughput screening technology. Following confirmation of the up-mutants by HPLC analysis, the individual up-mutants will be combined in order to further enhance the properties of the mutant enzymes.
In parallel to GSSMTM, a GeneReassemblyTM can be performed on a combination of parent enzymes, at least one of which can be selected for activity and enantioselectivity on L-2-amino-6,6-dimethoxyhexanoic acid. At least two other nitrilases, with a high degree of homology, can be reassembled with the former enzyme(s); these enzymes will be selected in order to provide diversity to the reassembled sequences.
Crucial to the success of this evolution effort is the development of a high throughput assay for enantioselectivity. Such an assay is a novel enzyme-based enantioselectivity assay that allows for the screening of >30,000 mutants in a significantly shorter time period than the traditionally used method of HPLC.
In one aspect, a non-stochastic method, termed synthetic ligation reassembly, that is related to stochastic shuffling, except that the nucleic acid building blocks are not shuffled or concatenated or chimerized randomly, but rather are assembled non-stochastically, can be used to create variants. This method does not require the presence of high homology between nucleic acids to be shuffled. The ligation reassembly method can be used to non-stochastically generate libraries (or sets) of progeny molecules having at least 10100 or at least 101000 different chimeras. The ligation reassembly method provides a non-stochastic method of producing a set of finalized chimeric nucleic acids that have an overall assembly order that is chosen by design, which method is comprised of the steps of generating by design a plurality of specific nucleic acid building blocks having serviceable mutually compatible ligatable ends, as assembling these nucleic acid building blocks, such that a designed overall assembly order is achieved.
The mutually compatible ligatable ends of the nucleic acid building blocks to be assembled are considered to be “serviceable” for this type of ordered assembly if they enable the building blocks to be coupled in predetermined orders. Thus, in one aspect, the overall assembly order in which the nucleic acid building blocks can be coupled is specified by the design of the ligatable ends and, if more than one assembly step is to be used, then the overall assembly order in which the nucleic acid building blocks can be coupled is also specified by the sequential order of the assembly step(s). In a one embodiment of the invention, the annealed building pieces are treated with an enzyme, such as a ligase (e.g., T4 DNA ligase) to achieve covalent bonding of the building pieces.
In a another embodiment, the design of nucleic acid building blocks is obtained upon analysis of the sequences of a set of progenitor nucleic acid templates that serve as a basis for producing a progeny set of finalized chimeric nucleic acid molecules. These progenitor nucleic acid templates thus serve as a source of sequence information that aids in the design of the nucleic acid building blocks that are to be mutagenized, i.e. chimerized, recombined or shuffled.
In one exemplification, the invention provides for the chimerization of a family of related genes and their encoded family of related products. In a particular exemplification, the encoded products are nitrilase enzymes. Nucleic acids encoding the nitrilases of the invention can be mutagenized in accordance with the methods described herein.
Thus, according to one aspect of the invention, the sequences of a plurality of progenitor nucleic acid templates encoding nitrilases are aligned in order to select one or more demarcation points, which demarcation points can be located at an area of homology. The demarcation points can be used to delineate the boundaries of nucleic acid building blocks to be generated. Thus, the demarcation points identified and selected in the progenitor molecules serve as potential chimerization points in the assembly of the progeny molecules.
Typically a serviceable demarcation point is an area of homology (comprised of at least one homologous nucleotide base) shared by at least two progenitor templates, but the demarcation point can be an area of homology that is shared by at least half of the progenitor templates, at least two thirds of the progenitor templates, at least three fourths of the progenitor templates, and preferably at almost all of the progenitor templates. Even more preferably still a serviceable demarcation point is an area of homology that is shared by all of the progenitor templates.
In a one embodiment, the ligation reassembly process is performed exhaustively in order to generate an exhaustive library. In other words, all possible ordered combinations of the nucleic acid building blocks are represented in the set of finalized chimeric nucleic acid molecules. At the same time, the assembly order (i.e., the order of assembly of each building block in the 5′ to 3′ sequence of each finalized chimeric nucleic acid) in each combination is by design (or non-stochastic, non-random). Because of the non-stochastic nature of the method, the possibility of unwanted side products is greatly reduced.
In another embodiment, the method provides that, the ligation reassembly process is performed systematically, for example in order to generate a systematically compartmentalized library, with compartments that can be screened systematically, e.g., one by one. Each compartment (or portion) holds chimeras or recombinants with known characteristics. In other words the invention provides that, through the selective and judicious use of specific nucleic acid building blocks, coupled with the selective and judicious use of sequentially stepped assembly reactions, an experimental design can be achieved where specific sets of progeny products are made in each of several reaction vessels. This allows a systematic examination and screening procedure to be performed. Thus, it allows a potentially very large number of progeny molecules to be examined systematically in smaller groups.
Because of its ability to perform chimerizations in a manner that is highly flexible, yet exhaustive and systematic, particularly when there is a low level of homology among the progenitor molecules, the invention described herein provides for the generation of a library (or set) comprised of a large number of progeny molecules. Because of the non-stochastic nature of the ligation reassembly method, the progeny molecules generated preferably comprise a library of finalized chimeric nucleic acid molecules having an overall assembly order that is chosen by design. In a particularly embodiment, such a generated library is comprised of greater than 103 to greater than 101000 different progeny molecular species.
In another exemplification, the synthetic nature of the step in which the building blocks are generated allows the design and introduction of nucleotides (e.g., one or more nucleotides, which may be, for example, codons or introns or regulatory sequences) that can later be optionally removed in an in vitro process (e.g., by mutagenesis) or in an in vivo process (e.g., by utilizing the gene splicing ability of a host organism). It is appreciated that in many instances the introduction of these nucleotides may also be desirable for many other reasons in addition to the potential benefit of creating a serviceable demarcation point.
The synthetic ligation reassembly method of the invention utilizes a plurality of nucleic acid building blocks, each of which preferably has two ligatable ends. The two ligatable ends on each nucleic acid building block may be two blunt ends (i.e. each having an overhang of zero nucleotides), or preferably one blunt end and one overhang, or more preferably still two overhangs. On a double-stranded nucleic acid, a useful overhang can be a 3′ overhang, or a 5′ overhang. A nucleic acid building block can have a 3′ overhang, a 5′ overhang, two 3′ overhangs, or two 5′ overhangs. The overall order in which the nucleic acid building blocks are assembled to form a finalized chimeric nucleic acid molecule is determined by purposeful experimental design (e.g., by designing sticky ends between building block nucleic acids based on the sequence of the 5′ and 3′ overhangs) and is not random.
According to one preferred embodiment, a nucleic acid building block is generated by chemical synthesis of two single-stranded nucleic acids (also referred to as single-stranded oligos) and contacting them together under hybridization conditions so as to allow them to anneal to form a double-stranded nucleic acid building block. A double-stranded nucleic acid building block can be of variable size. The sizes of these building blocks can be small or large. Preferred sizes for building block range from 1 base pair (not including any overhangs) to 100,000 base pairs (not including any overhangs). Other preferred size ranges are also provided, which have lower limits of from 1 bp to 10,000 bp (including every integer value in between), and upper limits of from 2 bp to 100,000 bp (including every integer value in between).
According to one embodiment, a double-stranded nucleic acid building block is generated by first generating two single stranded nucleic acids and allowing them to anneal to form a double-stranded nucleic acid building block. The two strands of a double-stranded nucleic acid building block may be complementary at every nucleotide apart from any that form an overhang; thus containing no mismatches, apart from any overhang(s). According to another embodiment, the two strands of a double-stranded nucleic acid building block are complementary at fewer than every nucleotide apart from any that form an overhang. Thus, according to this embodiment, a double-stranded nucleic acid building block can be used to introduce codon degeneracy. Preferably the codon degeneracy is introduced using the site-saturation mutagenesis described herein, using one or more N,N,GIT cassettes or alternatively using one or more N,N,N cassettes.
EXAMPLE 15
Assays for Evaluation of Nitrilase Activity and Enantioselectivity
An assay method amenable to high throughput automation to increase the screening throughput both of the discovery and evolution efforts for nitrilases is described. The ideal assay is one that permits quantification of both product formation or substrate conversion and also enantiomeric excess. Two achiral and two chiral colorimetric assays that are amenable to high throughput screening were developed.
Achiral Colorimetric Assays Developed:
OPA assay for residual substrate. The OPA assay is Applicable to α-amino or α-hydroxy nitrile substrates. The lysis of whole cells is not necessary. These results were corroborated by HPLC for 2-chloromandelonitrile and phenyl acetaldehyde cyanohydrin. The assay works best with aromatic nitriles. Aliphatic compounds exhibit a linear standard curve, fluorescence is reduced, reducing the efficacy of the assay.
LDH Assay for quantification and ee determination of hydroxyacid formed. The LDH assay is applicable to phenyl lactic acid but not to 2-chloromandelic acid. Use of a resazurin detection system increases sensitivity and reduces background. Background fluorescence of whole cells was overcome either by centrifugation or heat inactivation prior to performing assay.
AAO Assay for quantification and ee determination of aminoacid formed. The AAO assay is applicable to phenylalanine and (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid. The use of the Amplex Red detection system increases sensitivity. Cell lysis was shown not be necessary. Cells are grown in defined media in order to prevent background fluorescence.
OPA Assay
The o-phthalaldehyde (OPA) fluorescence based nitrilase assay is used to quantify the amount of α-hydroxynitrile substrate remaining OPA reacts with the cyanide released from the pH controlled decomposition of α-hydroxynitriles to the corresponding aldehyde and cyanide to yield a fluorescent, quantifiable product. OPA reacts with the cyanide released from the pH controlled decomposition of α-hydroxynitriles to the corresponding aldehyde and cyanide to yield the fluorescent 1-cyano-2-R benzoisoindole.




Standard curves were established for the following substrates: 2-Chloromandelonitrile (CMN, 0.998), Cyclohexylmandelonitrile (CHMN, 0.99), Acetophenone aminonitrile (APA, 0.99), and Phenylacetaldehyde cyanohydrin (PAC, 0.97), (FIG. 5), (R2 values in parentheses). A standard curve for Phenylglycine (PGN, 0.93) was also established. Three of the substrates tested, Dimethylbutanal aminonitrile (DMB) (2-amino-4,4-dimethyl pentanenitrile), Hydroxypivaldehyde aminonitrile (HPA) and Pivaldehyde aminonitrile (PAH), gave very low fluorescence readings and unreliable results under the original assay conditions. For these compounds a number of parameters where adjusted, however the fluorescent signal strength of these compounds was not increased by these manipulations.
In an attempt to increase the fluorescent signal of these three compounds, naphthalene dicarboxaldehyde (NDA) was substituted for OPA. Standard curves for PAH, HPA and DMB with either OPA or NDA were constructed. To determine sensitivity and background fluorescence, a lyophilized nitrilase lysate (SEQ ID NOS:189, 190) with suspected catalytic activity on each of the substrates was added. Hydrolysis was detected in three out of four of the compounds. NDA sharply boosted the signal, often by an order of magnitude, though this reduced linearity is presumably due to signal saturation.
NDA was established as an alternative detection reagent for the aliphatic compounds. However, it is desirable for the assay to utilize the same detection system for all of the substrates since this would facilitate the automated evaluation of multiple nitrilase substrates. The current OPA based assay is effective for the analysis of PAC, CMN, CHMN, APA, MN and PGN. While standard curves have been developed for the aliphatic compounds PAH, HPA, and DMB.
Whole Cell Optimization
The effect of addition of lyophilized nitrilase lysate to the assay components, either untreated or heat inactivated, was evaluated. Interfering background fluorescence was not observed in either case. The OPA assay was next evaluated and optimized for nitrilase activity detection in a whole cell format. Both nitrilase expressing whole cells and in-situ lysed cells were evaluated. Lyophilized cell lysates were evaluated alongside their respective whole cell clones as controls. For this optimization study, mandelonitrile (MN) was chosen as a model substrate.
The lyophilized cell lysate of SEQ ID NOS:187, 188 was evaluated alongside whole cells expressing SEQ ID NOS:187, 188 and in situ lysed cells expressing SEQ ID NOS:187, 188 The addition of whole cells did not affect fluorescence nor result in fluorescence quenching. Addition of any of the three cell lysis solutions improved permeability (and therefore conversion) of mandelonitrile in the whole cell systems. Three cell lysing solutions were evaluated: B-PER (Pierce), BugBuster (Novagen) and CelLytic B-II (Sigma) and were found not to have a deleterious affect on the OPA assay. The addition of product α-hydroxyacid or α-aminoacid did not affect detection by the OPA assay.
The assay was modified from its original format, which required several liquid transfer steps, into a one plate process, where cell growth, nitrile hydrolysis and OPA assay reaction occurred in the same microtiter plate. Mandelonitrile was tested using this single well format. In this case, the E. coli. Gene site-saturation mutagenesis (GSSMTM) cell host was evaluated. Three clones were tested: SEQ ID NOS:101, 102, SEQ ID NOS:187, 188, and an empty vector, which was used as a control. Hydrolysis was evaluated at four timepoints, at 10 and 20 mM, and also with a 0 mM control. In an earlier experiment, clone SEQ ID NOS:187, 188 was evaluated against the phenylacetaldehyde cyanohydrin substrate (for which this enzyme does not exhibit activity), and no activity was observed.
The OPA assay was found to detect the presence of both α-hydroxy and α-amino nitrile substrate. Aromatic compounds were readily detectable with the assay, while aliphatic compounds posed some detection challenges. No background issues were evident when using lyophilized cell lysates, in-situ lysed whole cells or unlysed whole cells. The assay is amenable to one-plate analysis, where cells are grown, incubated with the substrate, and assayed on the same plate: no liquid transfers are required, easing automation. While all nitriles tested produced a linear response, aliphatic compounds gave a low fluorescent response.
Chiral LDH Assay
A spectroscopic system based on lactate dehydrogenase (L-LDH) was developed for the analysis of the chiral α-hydroxy acids which are generated by the nitrilase catalyzed hydrolysis of cyanohydrins. The hydroxynitrile substrate is not metabolized by the secondary or detection enzyme and thus starting material does not interfere. Cell lysate which is not heat treated results in background activity for the LDH system; however, heat inactivation or pelleting of the cell lysates eliminates the background activity. (See FIG. 4.)
The activity and enantiomeric specificity of commercially available D- and L-lactate dehydrogenases against the nitrilases disclosed herein was evaluated. An LDH was identified which is suitable to both D- and L-phenyl lactic acid analysis. An enzyme suitable for 2-Chloromandelic acid analysis was not found. The chosen LDH enzymes exhibited virtually absolute stereoselectivity. The viability of the assay to detect D- and L-LDH produced from PAC using lyophilized cell lysate was established.
Originally, three colorimetric dyes were evaluated, all of which are tetrazolium salts: NBT (3,3′-dimethoxy-4,4′-biphenylene)bis[2,(4-nitrophenyl)-5-phenyl-2H]-, chloride) MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) INT (2-(4-Iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-phenyl-2H-tetrazolium chloride). The insolubility of the product of these detection system posed an analytical challenge. To address this, another tetrazolium salt with a reportedly soluble product, XTT (2,3-Bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide, was evaluated. While XTT yielded a soluble bright red product, the substrate was insoluble which thus effected the same analytical challenges. As an alternative to the tetrazolium family of dyes, the dual colorimetric/fluorometric dye resazurin was evaluated. Oxidation of resazurin produces resourfin. Both substrate and product are soluble, and the color change can be quantified colorimetrically or fluorimetrically, increasing accuracy. Due to the sensitivity of resazurin, 0.05 mM of lactic acid can be quantified. Optimal results were obtained when using the dye in the same range as the substrate, e.g. 0.5 mM resazurin can quantify a range of lactic (and analogs) from 0.05 to 0.5, though the best linearity is at the lower end of this scale. Resourfin was stable over 28 hours, and had a linear fluorescent response.
In the presence of the LDH assay components, lyophilized enzyme gave background fluorescence/absorption. To address this problem the lysate was boiled for 10 minutes and then centrifuged. This resulted in a 90% decrease in background signal. Interestingly, both centrifugation alone (5 minutes @ 14.1 rcf) or boiling followed by centrifugation (5 minutes @ 100° C.) reduced the fluorescence to background levels. In a high-throughput format such as 1536 well plates, spinning would be preferable to boiling, as boiling would increase evaporation (8 μl well size) and potentially volatize the nitrile substrates. No background signal resulting from growth media (LB and TB and M9) or cell lytic solutions (B-PER, CelLytic and BugBuster) was noted.
Chiral AAO Assay
A spectroscopic system based on amino acid oxidase (AAO) was developed for the analysis of the chiral α-amino acids which are generated by the nitrilase catalyzed hydrolysis of amino nitriles.
Assay Development and Validation
The initial assay validation utilized the 2,2′-azino-di-{3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) detection system as outlined above. However, since the color was not stable further investigations utilized the phenol amino antipyrine (PAAP) detection system which is analyzed at λ max 510 nm. Enzymes with suitable activity were found for each enantiomer of 4-methyl-leucine, phenylalanine, (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid, and tert-leucine. The assay is not applicable to methylphenylglycine and does not work well with phenylglycine.
Standard curves were generated for phenylalanine from 0-15 mM. The curve is much more linear when the concentrations remained below 1 mM. The color remains stable for several days as long as it is kept in the dark. Three cell lysing solutions Bug Buster (BB), Bacterial Protein Extracting Reagent (BPER), and Cell Lytic Reagent (CLR) were added to the standard curve and shown to have no affect on color development. The addition of cell lysate (cl) did not exhibit background color formation. Addition of the phenylacetaldehyde aminonitrile sulfate (PAS) starting material also showed no effect on color formation.
The AAO system exhibits greater linearity at up to 1 mM substrate. The concentration of the AAO enzymes and of the acid substrate were adjusted to try to move the intersection of the L-AAO and D-AAO curves closer to the middle of the graph. Premixing the PAAP, the HRP, and the AAO was demonstrated to be effective and caused no change in observed activity establishing that the assay components may be added to the assay in a cocktail format.
A high level of background was observed for the AAO assay of whole cells and this was attributed to the L-amino acids present in the TB and LB growth media. Washing and resuspension of the cells in M9 media eliminated background. For all future experiments cells were grown in M9 media with 0.2% glucose. The lysed cells gave only a slightly better response that unlysed cells. Therefore, cell lysis is not necessary. SEQ ID NOS:187, 188 demonstrated activity on HPA in primary screening based on HPLC analysis.
The use of a fluorescent detection system which would permits implementation of the assay in ultra high throughput fashion such as 1536 well or gigamatrix format was investigated. The fluorescent reagent most applicable to our system is Amplex Red from Molecular Probes which produces the highly fluorescent resorufin (λex 545 nm; λem 590 nm) Standard curves for phenylalanine and (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid were established (0-100 μM).
In preparation for assay automation, nitrilase expressing cells were added into microtiter plate containing M9 0.2% glucose, 0.25 mM IPTG media by florescence activated cell sorting (FACS). Three nitrilase expressing subclones, and the empty vector control were evaluated: SEQ ID NOS:101, 102, SEQ ID NOS:187, 188, SEQ ID NOS:29, 30 and the empty vector. The viability of the cells following cell sorting proved to be inconsistent. Thus colony picking is currently being evaluated as an alternative method to add cells into microtiter plates. The evaporative loss from an uncovered 1536-well microtiter plate is approximately 30% per day in the robot incubator (incubator conditions: 37° C. at 85% relative humidity (RH)). Incubation in the 95% RH incubator reduced evaporative loss to 1% per day.
The ability of the three subclones to grow in the presence of up to 3.5 mM of nitrile was established using HPA nitrile. Growth rates were only slightly retarded (less that 30%). Subclones grown in the presence of HPA were shown to express a nitrilase that catalyzes the formation of hydroxy norleucine (HNL) as established using the Amplex Red detection system. Only S was evaluated as the enzymes are S-selective. The reaction plate was read at 10 minute intervals, with 40 minutes showing the best linearity. While cell growth is significantly inhibited above 5 mM of HPA when the cells were grown at pH 7, growth was inhibited above 0.1 mM HPA for cells grown at pH 8.
In order to verify the AAO results by HPLC, a reaction was performed using high concentrations of HPA, up to 40 mM (due to HPLC detection challenges for (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid) and lyophilized cell lysate SEQ ID NOS:187, 188.
Comparison AAO and HPLC Data for HNL














[HNL]
% ee

% conversion












mM
AAO
HPLC
AAO
HPLC





40
89%
100% 
17%
18%


30
89%
97%
29%
36%


20
86%
97%
21%
34%


10
78%
98%
13%
35%









In order to determine if conducting the screen at a lower concentration introduces a bias in the results compared to the 20 mM substrate range that was used for HPLC based screens, an experiment was performed with SEQ ID NOS:187, 188 using three concentration ranges. Each experiment was done in triplicate in order to remove any nonsystematic error.
SEQ ID NOS:187, 188: Observed Conversion and ee at Multiple Concentrations of HPA













[HPA] mM

















10
20
30
1
2
3
0.1
0.2
0.3











Enantiomeric Excess (% ee)
















Trial #1
60
54
72
61
64
63
60
63
60


Trial #2
57
62
69
58
57
53
32
51
37


Trial #3
53
62
69
60
55
52
79
103 
72


AVG
57%
59%
70%
59%
59%
56%
57%
72%
56%







% Conversion
















Trial #1
27%
27%
37%
34%
29%
43%
37%
29%
42%


Trial #2
42%
43%
49%
48%
42%
56%
46%
44%
54%


Trial #3
31%
32%
43%
22%
29%
27%
46%
27%
35%


AVG
33%
34%
43%
35%
34%
42%
43%
33%
44%









The AAO assay can be run on 384 or 1536 well format with cells sorted into an M9 0.2% glucose, 0.25 mM IPTG media. Cells can be grown in the presence of nitrile (in this case HPA), or the cells can be allowed to reach a certain density and the nitrile can then be added. Though cell lytic reagents do not interfere with the assay, when HPA was assayed, addition of the lytic reagents was found to be unnecessary. Either pre- or post-nitrile addition, the mother plate will have to be split into daughter plates, which are then assayed for the respective L- and D-enantiomer content. Incubation times with the AAO/Amplex Red reagents can be adjusted so that the D- and L-plate are read at separate times.
EXAMPLE 16
Identification, Development and Production of Robust, Novel Enzymes Targeted for a Series of High-Value Enantioselective Bioprocesses
The invention provides for the development of nitrilases, through directed evolution, which provide significant technical and commercial advantages for the process manufacturing of the following chemical target:
L-2-amino-6,6-dimethoxyhexanoic acid




Nitrilase enzymes were shown to hydrolyze 2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanenitrile to (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid, with selectivity towards the L-enantiomer. The panel of nitrilases was screened against the target, 5,5-dimethoxypentanal aminonitrile. The positive enzymes were characterized on this substrate. A primary screen is used to identify putative up-mutants, which is then confirmed using HPLC.
GSSMTM and GeneReassemblyTM are performed on selected nitrilases, in order to improve the enantioselectivity and activity of the enzymes for the production of L-2-amino-6,6-dimethoxyhexanoic acid. Nitrilases were identified for the enantioselective hydrolysis of 2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanenitrile to L-(S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid. However, a slight structural difference is presented by the new target molecule, L-2-amino-6,6-dimethoxyhexanoic acid. In order to determine whether this difference affects the activity and enantioselectivity of the enzymes, the complete spectrum of nitrilases was screened against the new target.
First, identification of the correct target gene for GSSM through more detailed characterization of the hit enzymes for the production of L-2-amino-6,6-dimethoxyhexanoic acid was carried out. This effort involves a more extensive investigation of the effects of pH and temperature on activity and enantioselectivity and a more in-depth analysis of the stability of the enzyme to process conditions. Prior to initiation of the screening, the synthesis of a single enantiomer of an alkyl aminonitrile is done; the racemization of this nitrile is studied, in an effort to understand the relationship between this factor and enantioselectivity of the enzymes.
An enzyme exhibiting the highest combination of activity and enantioselectivity for the production of L-2-amino-6,6-dimethoxyhexanoic acid is selected for GSSM. Following the mutation of the target enzyme, the resulting mutants are screened on 5,5-dimethoxypentanal aminonitrile, using high throughput screening technology. Following confirmation of the up-mutants by HPLC analysis a decision point is reached, in order to evaluate the results of the GSSM on the target.
In parallel to GSSMTM, a GeneReassemblyTM is performed on a combination of parent enzymes, at least one of which is selected for activity and enantioselectivity on L-2-amino-6,6-dimethoxyhexanoic acid. At least two other nitrilases are reassembled with the former enzyme(s); these enzymes are selected in order to provide diversity to the reassembled sequences.
The present invention provides for development of racemization conditions for the original substrate aminonitriles. In addition, the present invention provides for the identification of enzymes capable of the conversion of these aminonitriles to the target α-amino acids by dynamic kinetic resolution. The present invention also provides for screening and development of a nitrilase-catalyzed kinetic resolution process for (R)-2-amino-6,6-dimethoxy hexanoic acid (allysine) production. (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid will be used as a model substrate for development of the kinetic resolution.
The target α-amino acid products are shown below:
(i) D-4-Fluorophenylglycine




(ii) L-2-Amino-6,6-dimethoxyhexanoic acid (Allysine)




Conditions are developed for the racemization of the aminonitrile substrates for the nitrilase-catalyzed production of D-4-fluorophenylglycine and 2-amino-4,4-dimethyl pentanenitrile (allysine). Two model substrates, phenylglycinonitrile and pentanal aminonitrile are used initially, and racemization is studied in the absence of the enzyme. Concurrently determination of the performance of one or more available nitrilases under a variety of possible racemization conditions is carried out. In addition, the nitrilases are screened against hydroxypentanal aminonitrile for the production of (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid, and the promising enzymes are optimized. Once racemization conditions are established, the nitrilases are screened for activity. Further optimization for a kinetic resolution of the product is performed.
A number of enantioselective nitrilases were identified for the hydrolysis of α-aminonitriles to α-amino acids. While these enzymes were shown to have a preference for the required enantiomer of certain aminonitriles, a limiting factor in the further screening, development and comparison of candidate nitrilases is the rate of racemization of the aminonitrile substrates under the reaction conditions.
Aromatic Aminonitrile Racemization
The first step is to establish conditions under which aromatic aminonitrile racemization occurs, using the model substrate, phenylglycinonitrile. Racemization strategies include, but are not limited to the list below. Options are roughly prioritized according to their commercial applicability.
(1) Manipulation of the pH of the reaction. Since it has been shown that racemization is rapid at high pH, this approach requires the discovery and optimization of nitrilases which are active and selective at pH>10.
(2) Addition of known chemical racemizing agents, such as aldehydes, ketones, weak bases, resins, metal ions, Lewis acids etc., which can enhance racemization at lower pH.
(3) Synthesis of N-acylated aminonitrile derivatives, e.g., N-acetyl phenylglycinonitrile, which may be more easily racemized In the case of N-acetyl phenylglycinonitrile, a selective D-acylase which removes the acetyl group would enhance the optical purity of the nitrilase product.
(4) Use of a biphasic system in which base-catalyzed racemization occurs in the hydrophobic organic phase and enzymatic hydrolysis in the aqueous phase.
(5) Use of a 2-enzyme system comprised of a nitrilase and an aminonitrile racemase. One amino acid racemase is commercially available at present, and will be tested for activity against phenyl- and fluorophenylglycinonitrile. Gene libraries will be searched for genes showing homology to known amino acid amide racemases, hydantoin racemases or any other racemases which can be identified.
Once conditions for this racemization have been established, they provide the basis for development of conditions for racemization of the target aromatic substrate, 4-fluorophenylglycinonitrile (FPGN). The FPGN is expected to be less stable than the model substrate; thus, it may racemize more quickly, but degradation reactions may be faster as well. The ability of sample enzyme(s) to tolerate and/or function well under them is evaluated. Final optimization of screening methods include the target substrates, sample nitrilases, and substrate racemization conditions.
Investigations carried out have shown that phenylglycinonitrile is easily racemized at pH 10.8. However, it does not appear that any of the existing enzymes can tolerate such harsh conditions of pH. Samples from highly alkaline environments are screened for the presence of nitrilases which are tolerant to such conditions. Once discovered, the enzymes are sequenced and subcloned, and the enzymes are produced as lyophilized cell lysates ready for screening.
Aliphatic Aminonitrile Racemization
A model aliphatic aminonitrile, pentanal aminonitrile, is synthesized in its racemic form. However optically enriched samples are prepared using one the following approaches: (i) preparative chiral HPLC; (ii) diastereomeric salt resolution; (iii) diastereomeric derivatization or column chromatography; (iv) synthesis from L-N—BOC norleucine. An HPLC assay is used for the detection of these compounds.
HPLC Assay
An HPLC assay for the detection of the (S)-2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanoic acid is used. An assay involving pre-column derivatization is used.
Screening/Characterization:
Nitrilases are screened against 2-amino-6-hydroxy hexanenitrile. For enzymes capable of performing well at greater than 25 mM substrate, scale up reactions are performed. The substrate/product tolerance and stability profiles of the other enzymes are investigated.
The nitrilases are screened, and hits are characterized, focusing on pH and temperature optimum, enantioselectivity and stability under the reaction conditions.
Enzyme Evolution
A target enzyme exhibiting the desired properties is selected for GSSMTM. Following the mutation of the target enzyme, the resulting mutants are screened on the substrate using high throughput screening technology. Once the up-mutants have been confirmed by HPLC analysis, the individual mutations responsible for increased performance may be combined and evaluated for possible additive or synergistic effects.
In addition, a GeneReassemblyTM will be performed on a combination of lead enzymes, which are selected for their desirable characteristics, including activity, enantioselectivity and stability in the reaction.
EXAMPLE 17
Optimization of Nitrilases for the Enantioselective Production of (S)-Phenyllactic Acid
Nitrilases were identified for the enantioselective hydrolysis of 5 different nitrile substrates. These nitrilases were isolated and optimized for selected targets. The optimization involves process optimization and directed evolution. In particular, enzymes specific for the production of (S)-phenyllactic acid were characterized and optimized. This was aimed primarily at improving the activity of the enzymes, while maintaining a high enantioselectivity. An investigation into the effects of process conditions on the enzymes was also performed.




The development of high throughput assays for screening of mutants from potential directed evolution efforts was accomplished. Two achiral and two chiral colorimetric assays that are amenable to high throughput screening were developed and used for nitrilase directed evolution.
SEQ ID NOS:103, 104 was identified as a highly enantioselective nitrilase for the production of (S)-phenyllactic acid. Characterization of SEQ ID NOS:103, 104 shows the optimum reaction pH and temperature to be pH 8 and 37° C., respectively; the reaction starting material, phenylacetaldehyde, and the product, phenyllactic acid showed no effect on the enzyme activity up to levels of 5 mM and 30 mM, respectively. The scaled-up enzymatic reaction with an enantiomeric excess (ee) of 95%.
Summary of Enzymes Screened for Activity and Enantioselectivity on Phenylacetaldehyde Cyanohydrin















Enzyme





SEQ ID
concentration
Conversion
Time to highest


NOS:
(mg protein/ml)
(%)
conversion (h)
ee (%)



















109, 110
0.15
70%
2
71%


115, 116
0.15
70%
3
72%


127, 128
0.15
66%
8
70%


133, 134
0.6
60%
3
84%


135, 136
0.15
63%
7
87%


125, 126
0.6
63%
3
83%









EXAMPLE 18
Directed Evolution of a Nucleic Acid Encoding a Nitrilase Enzyme
The nitB gene (GenBank Accession No. AX025996, from Alcaligenes faecalis) was subjected to Gene Site Saturated MutagenesisTM or GSSMTM to generate a library of single amino acid substitution mutants covering the entire enzyme. The sequence of the “parental” nitB gene used in the directed evolution is SEQ ID NO:103, 104. A nitB mutant library was generated from carrying out GSSMTM. This nitB mutant library was then screened for clones with increased whole cell hydroxymethylthiobutryonitrile (HMTBN, which is a nitrilase substrate) activity. The product of the nitrilase reaction on that substrate is hydroxymethylthiobutyric acid (HMTBA).
Assays were run at 35° C. with 100 mM HMTBN and 100 mM K3PO4, pH 7 to approximately 30-40% conversion. Two methods were used to quantitate HMTBN conversion, one being direct measurement of HMTBS produced by HPLC analysis and the other being indirect detection of residual HMTBN using the fluorescent cyanide assay, which has previously been described.
Putative nitB up mutants were subjected to a secondary assay to confirm the increased activity. In the secondary assay, up mutants and the wild type control were induced in expression medium in shake flasks. Shake flask cultures are then washed with 100 mM K3PO4, pH7 and resuspended to the same optical density at 660 nm. Kinetic assays were then performed with the normalized cell resuspensions under the same conditions used in the initial assays. Putative up mutants confirmed to have increased HMTBN activity were sequenced and tested for increased activity after transformation back into the same expression strain to ensure that increases in activity are not due to host mutations.
A confirmed nitB GSSMTM up-mutant is nitB G46P, which contains a glycine (GGT) to proline (CCG) substitution at amino acid 46. The whole cell HMTBN activity of this mutant is approximately 50% greater than that of wild type NitB at both 25° C. and 35° C. Upon identification of the beneficial G46P mutation, GSSMTM was used again to generate a pool of double mutants using the nitB G46P template. These mutants all contain the G46P mutation and an additional single amino acid substitution at a random site. The double mutants were assayed for HMTBN activity greater than that of nitB G46P. Double, triple and quadruple mutants were created in order to speed up the mutation process and identify beneficial mutations more quickly. After the first few beneficial mutations were identified and isolated, they were combined to generate double mutants, the best of which was DM18. DM18 was used as a template to generate triple mutants. The most active triple mutant was TM3 and that was used as a template to generate quadruple mutants. The most active quadruple mutant was QM2. The table summarizes these mutations.














mutant
mutation 1
mutation 2
mutation 3
mutation 4







DM18
R (gcg) 29 C(tgt)
Y(tac) 207 M (atg)




TM3
R (gcg) 29 C(tgt)
Y(tac) 207 M (atg)
L(ctt) 170 T(act)


QM2
R (gcg) 29 C(tgt)
Y(tac) 207 M (atg)
L(ctt) 170 T(act)
A(gcg) 197 N9(aat)









The mutants were characterized first by studying their whole cell HMTBN activity. At 100 mM HMTBN, the HMTBS production rate of QM2 is 1.2 times greater than that of the parental gene. However, at 200 mM HMTBN, the rate of QM2 is 3.6 times that of the parental gene. The productivity of these mutants is increased considerably when the HMTBN concentration is raised from 100 mM to 300 mM. As to conversion rates, TM3 completely converted the substrate after 270 minutes and both DM18 and SM show greater than 75% conversion after this time. To further address the issue of HMTBN concentration effects on activity/productivity of NitB, several mutants were assayed at both 400 mM and 528 mM HMTBN. NitB is essentially inactive at these substrate concentrations, however the mutants retain significant activity at these concentrations. In particular, the activity at these high concentrations were essentially the same as their activity at 200 mM substrate. Therefore, the mutants can be used over a wide substrate concentration range and provide much more flexibility in utility than the NitB parental gene.
The mutants were shown to have higher expression levels than the parental gene and it also appeared that the QM2 and TM3 mutants contained a greater proportion of soluble enzyme than the wild type as seen in SDS-PAGE analysis. As to stability, all of the enzymes showed essentially the same stability pattern at both 25° C. and 35° C.
Finally, the mutants were subjected to codon-optimization. The approach was to optimize the codons and therefore increase the expression levels in the particular host cell. That would, in turn, increase the activity per cell of the enzyme. This resulted in increased whole cell activity in the codon-optimized mutants as compared to controls. The increase in activity was approximately double the activity. An E. coli expression system was used.
EXAMPLE 20
Selected Examples of Compounds Produced from a Nitrilase-Catalyzed Reaction






















In addition, the following are potential products which can be made via the nitrilase Strecker format. More than 100 amino acids and many new drugs can be produced from their respective aldehydes or ketones utilizing the nitrilase enzymes of the invention. For example, large market drugs which can be synthesized using nitrilases of the invention include homophenylalanine, VASOTECTM, VASOTERICTM, TECZEMTM, PRINIVILTM, PRINZIDETM, ZESTRILTM, ZESTORETICTM, RAMACETM, TARKATM, MAVIKTM, TRANDOAPRILTM, TRANDOLAPRILATTM, ALTACETM, ODRIKTM, UNIRETICTM, LOTENSINTM, LOTRELTM, CAPOTENTM, MONOPRILTM, TANATRILTM, ACECOLTM, LONGESTM, SPIRAPRILTM, QUINAPRILTM, and CILAZAPRILTM. Other chiral drugs include DEMSERTM (alpha-methyl-L-Tyrosine), ALDOCHLORTM, LEVOTHROIDTM, SYNTHROIDTM, CYTOMELTM, THYOLARTM, HYCODANTM, CUPRIMINETM, DEPENTM, PRIMAXINTM, MIGRANOLTM, D.H.E.-45, DIOVANTM, CEFOBIDTM, L-DOPA, D-DOPA, D-alpha-methyl-DOPA, L-alpha-methyl-DOPA, L-gamma-hydroxyglutamate, D-gamma-hydroxyglutamate, 3-(2-naphthyl)-L-alanine, D-homoserine, and L-homoserine.
Furthermore, the nitrilase enzymes of the invention can be useful for synthesizing the following amino acids. Many of these amino acids have pharmaceutical applications. D-phenylglycine, L-phenylglycine, D-hydroxyphenylglycine, L-hydroxyphenylglycine, L-tertiary leucine, D-tertiary leucine, D-isoleucine, L-isoleucine, D-norleucine, L-norleucine, D-norvaline, L-norvaline, D-2-thienylglycine, L-2-thienylglycine, L-2-aminobutyrate, D-2-aminobutyrate, D-cycloleucine, L-cycloleucine, D-2-methylphenylglycine, L-2-methylphenylglycine, L-thienylalanine, and D-thienylalanine.
The enzymes of the nitrilase enzymes of the invention can be useful for the synthesis of the following natural amino acids: glycine, L-alanine, L-valine, L-leucine, L-isoleucine, L-phenylalanine, L-tyrosine, L-tryptophan, L-cysteine, L-methionine, L-serine, D-serine, L-threonine, L-lysine, L-arginine, L-histidine, L-aspartate, L-glutamate, L-asparagine, L-glutamine, and L-proline. The following are examples of unnatural amino acids which can be produced using the nitrilase enzymes of the invention. D-alanine, D-valine, D-leucine, D-isoleucine, D-phenylalanine, D-tyrosine, D-tryptophan, D-cysteine, D-methionine, D-threonine, D-lysine, D-arginine, D-histidine, D-aspartate, D-glutamate, D-asparagine, D-glutamine, and D-proline.
Furthermore, nitrilase enzymes of the invention can be used in non-Strecker chemical reactions including the synthesis of more chiral drugs such as TAXOTERETM as well as chiral drugs containing 3-hydroxy-glutaronitrile (a $5.5 B market); LIPITORTM, BAYCOLTM, and LESCOLTM. Chiral product targets that are not drugs include PANTENOLTM, L-phosphinothricin, D-phosphinothricin, D-fluorophenylalanine, and L-fluorophenylalanine. Finally, nitrilase can be used to produce unnatural amino acid compounds lacking a chiral center such as sarcosine, iminodiacetic acid, EDTA, alpha-aminobutyrate, and beta-alanine.
The following section includes examples of substrates and products produced by the nitrilases of the invention. The chemical structures of the substrates and of the products are shown. Activities, yield and the specific nitrilase shown to be useful in the chemical reactions are included in Tables following the reactions. The chemical reactions shown here are non-limiting examples of activities of the nitrilases of the invention.












































2-chloro-






mandelic acid



Seq ID

Seq ID Protein
ee %












DNA

Yield %
(enantiomer)
















5
6
100% 
68% R



13
14
100% 
79% R



15
16
55%
81% R



33
34
95%
61% R



47
48
43%
65% R



55
56
100% 
93% R



85
86
50%
52% R



261
262
100% 
60% R



97
98
46%
85% R



279
280
>95% 
40% R



283
284
70%
76% R



331
332
36%
79% R



291
292
54%
74% R



101
102
53%
62% R



383
384
60%
80% R



385
386
80%
97% R



303
304
>95% 
51% R



139
140
60%
85% R



167
168
100% 
88% R



169
170
72%
85% R



185
186
44%
79% R



187
188
60%
78% R



197
198
100% 
87% R



217
218
72%
82% R





























4-bromo






mandelic acid



Seq ID

Seq ID Protein
ee %












DNA

Yield %
(enantiomer)
















3
4
12%
92% R



5
6
54%
78% R



333
334
48%
93% R



13
14
55%
89% R



15
16
57%
92% R



19
20
60%
92% R



29
30
58%
93% R



33
34
52%
49% R



47
48
60%
92% R



55
56
56%
94% R



57
58
60%
81% R



85
86
41%
84% R



261
262
48%
94% R



267
268
43%
94% R



97
98
53%
91% R



275
276
37%
42% R



279
280
59%
 2% R



283
284
49%
94% R



331
332
42%
89% R



291
292
47%
94% R



101
102
68%
77% R



383
384
67%
65% R



385
386
66%
99% R



303
304
44%
 6% R



139
140
61%
95% R



145
146
65%
89% R



167
168
54%
92% R



169
170
53%
64% R



185
186
56%
94% R



187
188
56%
59% R



189
190
59%
 6% R



197
198
56%
85% R



215
216
44%
65% R



217
218
57%
96% R



221
222
56%
55% R



223
224
91%
 1% S



231
232
 8%
94% R



249
250
55%
89% R





























phenyl






glycine



Seq ID

Seq ID Protein
ee %












DNA

Yield %
(enantiomer)
















5
6
80%
  10% R



15
16
>90% 
no






specificity



29
30
80-100%    
<20% R



47
48
40-50%   
<25% R



55
56
>90% 
<20% R



57
58
60%
  40% R



85
86
70%
  32% R



101
102
100% 
<20% R



383
384
75%
  62% R



385
386
71%
  45% R



139
140
100% 
<20% R



167
168
>90% 
<20% R



169
170
89-90%   
<20% R



185
186
~80% 
~25% R



187
188
84%
racemic



189
190
~90% 
<10% R



197
198
>90% 
  88% R



215
216
10-20%   
<20% R



217
218
52%
  86% R



221
222
20%
R-selective



231
232
20%
  80% R





























phenyl






methyl glycine



Seq ID

Seq ID Protein
ee %












DNA

Yield %
(enantiomer)







189
190
52%
45% R





























4-fluoro-






phenylglycine



Seq ID

Seq ID Protein
ee %












DNA

Yield %
(enantiomer)
















5
6
54%
 3% R



333
334
53%
2.5% R



13
14
56%
2.1% R



33
34
52.30%  
6.9% R



261
262
54%
4.5% R



267
268
44%
 22% R



97
98
55%
2.1% R



279
280
55%
7.5% S 



283
284
45%
0.2% R



291
292
54%
0.3% R



303
304
55%
  3% S





























2-amino-6-






hydroxy-






hexanoic acid



Seq ID

Seq ID Protein
ee %












DNA

Yield %
(enantiomer)
















5
6
24%
86% S



333
334
21%
85% S



13
14
16%
90% S



15
16
<10% 
activity






observed



29
30
 8%
78% S



55
56
80%
55% S



261
262
11%
79% S



361
362
 6%
72% R



267
267
25%
90% S



97
98
14%
88% S



279
280
35%
93% S



283
284
14%
85% S



343
344
19%
67% R



101
102
 9%
83% S



103
104
30%
91% S



303
304
34%
91% S



145
146
20%
85% S



167
168
35%
54% S



185
186
13%
86% S



187
188
50%
60% S



189
190
 5%
62% S



197
198
12%
88% S



217
218
100% 
52% S



221
222
32%
79% S



249
250
 8%
87% S





























2-amino-4,4-






dimethyl






pentanoic acid



Seq ID

Seq ID Protein
ee %












DNA

Yield %
(enantiomer)
















55
56
~40% 
<20% S  



59
60
30%
>95% S  



267
268
25%
90% S



103
104
30%
91% S



167
168
~40% 
<20% S  



221
222
32%
79% S





























phenyl






lactic acid



Seq ID

Seq ID Protein
ee %












DNA

Yield %
(enantiomer)
















321
322
33%
56% S



23
24
20%
 5% S



31
32
36%
 68% R



39
40
17%
 5% S



293
294
100% 
65% S



41
42
35%
 45% R



43
44
40%
85% S



49
50
75%
66% S



61
62
56%
80% S



73
74
100% 
  5% R



259
260
95%
33% S



335
336
96%
62% S



83
84
100% 
49% S



93
94
80%
50% S



95
96
57%
 60% R



271
272
75%
 60% R



273
274
100% 
45% S



275
276
20%
 3% S



99
100
90%
82% S



107
108
80%
40% S



109
110
80%
60% S



115
116
60%
63% S



117
118
20%
 4% S



125
126
20%
 6% S



127
128
20%
 8% S



129
130
20%
 9% S



133
134
30%
 8% S



135
136
30%
 7% S



113
114
20%
20% S



161
162
70%
66% S



171
172
52%
 60% R



173
174
20%
83% S



175
176
87%
45% S



183
184
50%
57% S



189
190
20%
 8% S



195
196
89%
89% S



205
206
90%
73% S



207
208
76%
85% S



209
210
98%
75% S



213
214
70%
86% S



227
228
99%
31% S



239
240
22%
100% R 



241
242
40%
 62% R





























Cyclohexyl-



Seq ID

Seq ID Protein
mandelic acid












DNA

Yield %
ee % (enantiomer)
















17
18
60%
Not determined



321
322
70%
Not determined



49
50
70%
Not determined



61
62
70%
Not determined



105
106
>90% 
Not determined



115
116
70%
Not determined



195
196
55%
Not determined



213
214
65%
Not determined



237
238
60%
Not determined


























Seq ID Protein













Seq ID

EE %
mandelic acid



DNA

(enantiomer)
YIELD %
















3
4
 1 S
22



5
6
97 R
100



333
334
93 R
100



9
10
 8 R
21



13
14
98 R
100



15
16
96 R
100



29
30
99 R
100



33
34
95 R
100



35
36
 3 S
15



39
40
35 S 
14



47
48
97 R
100



55
56
99 R
100



57
58
96 R
100



75
76
52 R
56



257
258
26 S 
12



81
82
16 S 
23



259
260
47 S 
15



83
84
46 S 
14



85
86
83 R
20



261
262
88 R
100



361
362
14 S 
22



267
268
96 R
100



97
98
99 R
100



277
278
41 R
13



279
280
28 R
100



283
284
94 R
100



331
332
87 S 
100



299
300
68 S 
12



351
352
89 R
100



317
318
55 S 
14



343
344
21 S 
49



291
292
81 R
100



287
288
 8 S
22



383
384
80 R
100



119
120
31 R
14



385
386
99 R
100



303
304
45 R
100



139
140
97 R
100



145
146
95 R
100



167
168
99 R
100



169
170
99 R
100



185
186
99 R
100



187
188
99 R
100



189
190
 9 R
100



197
198
99 R
100



209
210
15 S 
9



215
216
88 R
100



217
218
98 R
100



221
222
85 R
58



225
226
36 S 
14



231
232
91 R
100



235
236
87 S 
22



237
238
18 S 
8



239
240
35 S 
16



249
250
98 R
100























3-hydroxy-4-












Seq ID Protein
cyanobutyric














Seq ID

EE %
acid



NOTES
DNA

(enantiomer)
YIELD %


















1
2
not
activity






determined
observed




3
4
 4 S
activity







observed




7
8
 6 S
activity







observed




333
334
 6 S
activity







observed




9
10
16 S
activity







observed




11
12
  8 R
104 




15
16
not
activity






determined
observed




17
18
 16 R
activity







observed




19
20
  7 R
activity







observed




21
22
 6 S
activity







observed




321
322
 51 R
activity







observed




25
26
19 S
activity







observed




27
28
 6 S
activity







observed




27
28
100 S 
111 




29
30
 16 R
100 




31
32
 54 R
127 




33
34
12 S
activity







observed




35
36
100 S 
35




37
38
100 S 
87




39
40
24 S
activity







observed




293
294
12 S
91




255
256
65 S
activity







observed




41
42
100 R 
16




43
44
not
activity






determined
observed




47
48
38 S
96




49
50
52 S
activity







observed




55
56
 92 R
122 




57
58
100 S 
73




59
60
100 S 
100 




61
62
 18 R
activity







observed




63
64
 10 R
 9




69
70
 2 S
activity







observed




71
72
not
activity






determined
observed




73
74
100 S 
 3




325
326
 73 R
 4




77
78
100 S 
activity







observed




257
258
  3 R
activity







observed




259
260
55 S
activity







observed




83
84
34 S
activity







observed




261
262
 22 R
activity







observed




361
362
 4 S
activity







observed




89
90
 31 R
116 




297
298
 24 R
activity







observed




91
92
 6 S
activity







observed




267
268
not
activity






determined
observed




93
94
58 S
activity







observed




95
96
 21 R
activity







observed




97
98
 17 R
activity







observed




275
276
80 S
activity







observed




279
280
 9 S
activity







observed




281
282
not
activity






determined
observed




283
284
 23 R
activity







observed




313
314
12 S
activity







observed




351
352
11 S
activity







observed




309
310
28 S
activity







observed




291
292
13 S
activity







observed




287
288
100 S 
activity







observed




99
100
100 S 
activity







observed




101
102
80 S
61




383
384
  8 R
activity







observed




103
104
100 R 
98




105
106
13 S
activity







observed




107
108
100 S 
79




109
110
100 S 
79




111
112
91 S
32




113
114
100 S 
activity







observed




115
116
66 S
activity







observed




117
118
 22 R
activity







observed



Different
119
120
13 S
activity



subclone



observed



Different
119
120
100 S 
activity



subclone



observed




123
124
20 S
activity







observed




385
386
13 S
activity







observed




125
126
25 S
activity







observed




127
128
92 S
106 




129
130
100 S 
22




131
132
100 S 
activity







observed




133
134
86 S
14




135
136
22 S
activity







observed




139
140
16 S
activity







observed




113
114
100 S 
108 




143
144
100 S 
activity







observed




145
146
100 S 
100 




149
150
3.2 S 
activity







observed




151
152
  8 R
activity







observed




153
154
35 S
39




155
156
100 S 
activity







observed




157
158
 26 R
activity







observed




159
160
100 S 
71




161
162
 64 R
122 




163
164
10 S
activity







observed




167
168
 10 R
106 




169
170
 14 R
38




171
172
 27 R
33




173
174
 20 R
activity







observed




175
176
31 S
58




177
178
100 S 
11




179
180
100 S 
75




181
182
100 S 
58




183
184
100 S 
19




185
186
100 S 
78




187
188
 7 S
activity







observed




189
190
 5 S
104 




193
194
 7 S
activity







observed




195
196
 95 R
100 




197
198
100 S 
64




201
202
100 S 
132 




253
254
 4 S
activity







observed




203
204
not
activity






determined
observed




205
206
 64 R
activity







observed




207
208
 95 R
100 




209
210
 95 R
100 




213
214
 25 R
activity







observed




215
216
100 S 
activity







observed




217
218
11 S
109 




219
220
not
activity






determined
observed




221
222
 26 R
100 




223
224
 5 S
activity







observed




227
228
52 S
activity







observed



Clone
229
230
31 S
activity







observed



Subclone
229
230
100 S 
activity







observed




231
232
100 S 
activity







observed




233
234
35 S
activity







observed




235
236
 6 S
activity







observed




237
238
 95 R
100 




239
240
not
activity






determined
observed




241
242
  9 R
activity







observed




243
244
100 S 
activity







observed




245
246
 5 S
activity







observed




247
248
not
activity






determined
observed




249
250
21 S
98




251
252
 5 S
activity







observed










The indications of subclones and clones refer to subclones of the originally isolated nucleic acid of the respective SEQ ID NO.
















Seq ID Protein
2-bromo












Seq ID

EE %
mandelic acid



DNA

(enantiomer)
YIELD %
















5
6
82 R
63



97
98
95 R
100



101
102
92 R
92



385
386
96 R
100



185
186
92 R
90



187
188
90 R
100



197
198
93 R
74



217
218
90 R
100



235
236
91 R
30


























Seq ID Protein
2-methyl












Seq ID

EE %
mandelic acid



DNA

(enantiomer)
YIELD %
















5
6
85 R
100



55
56
90 R
100



97
98
93 R
100



383
384
97 R
100



385
386
97 R
100



139
140
88 R
100



145
146
93 R
100



167
168
85 R
100



185
186
93 R
95



187
188
96 R
100



197
198
86 R
100



217
218
80 R
100

























Seq ID Protein
3-chloro










EE %
mandelic acid



(enantiomer)
YIELD %





386
98 R
100















Seq ID Protein
3-bromo












Seq ID

EE %
mandelic acid



DNA

(enantiomer)
YIELD %







385
386
99 R
100


























Seq ID Protein
4-fluoro-












Seq ID

EE %
mandelic acid



DNA

(enantiomer)
YIELD %
















5
6
82 R
50



15
16
92 R
45



55
56
97 R
45



85
86
97 R
40



97
98
98 R
45



101
102
95 R
50



385
386
99 R
100



167
168
97 R
50



185
186
97 R
50



187
188
95 R
50



197
198
79 R
45



215
216
89 R
40



217
218
98 R
50



221
222
68 R
45


























Seq ID Protein
2-napthyl












Seq ID

EE %
glycolic acid



DNA

(enantiomer)
YIELD %
















13
14
95 R
85



97
98
93 R
40



101
102
96 R
100



383
384
98 R
100



385
386
98 R
100



125
126
95 R
20



127
128
75 R
4



133
134
97 R
20



145
146
96 R
100



169
170
97 R
100



187
188
95 R
100



201
202
98 R
9


























Seq ID Protein
1-napthyl












Seq ID

EE %
glycolic acid



DNA

(enantiomer)
YIELD %
















13
14
82 R
100



97
98
84 R
100



101
102
69 R
100



383
384
46 R
100



385
386
95 R
100



125
126
83 R
16



127
128
33 R
13



133
134
42 R
16



145
146
69 R
100



169
170
62 R
100



187
188
55 R
100



201
202
59 R
15


























Seq ID Protein
3-pyridyl












Seq ID

EE %
glycolic acid



DNA

(enantiomer)
YIELD %
















5
6
94 R
100



13
14
94 R
100



29
30
95 R
95



47
48
95 R
100



55
56
92 R
85



57
58
95 R
100



97
98
96 R
100



383
384
95 R
100



385
386
96 R
100



139
140
90 R
100



145
146
89 R
100



167
168
94 R
100



169
170
91 R
70



185
186
93 R
90



187
188
95 R
100



197
198
93 R
100



217
218
94 R
100



249
250
94 R
90


























Seq ID Protein
3-thienyl-












Seq ID

EE %
glycolic acid



DNA

(enantiomer)
YIELD %







385
386
95 R
100


























Seq ID Protein
2-pyridyl












Seq ID

EE %
glycolic acid



DNA

(enantiomer)
YIELD %







385
386
95 R
100
























Seq ID Protein
2-hydroxy-4-phenyl












Seq ID

EE %
butyric acid


NOTES
DNA

(enantiomer)
YIELD %















1
2
66 S
92



3
4
82 S
12



5
6
85 S
100



7
8
81 S
13



333
334
85 S
100



9
10
88 S
13



13
14
82 S
100



15
16
72 S
22



17
18
67 S
100



19
20
90 S
81



21
22
69 S
32



321
322
66 S
100



23
24
71 S
27



25
26
69 S
70



27
28
72 S
20



29
30
91 S
100



31
32
13 S
100



33
34
83 S
38



35
36
69 S
26



37
38
66 S
76



39
40
 3 S
110



293
294
not
100





determined



307
308
56 S
54



255
256
74 S
27



41
42
82 S
100



43
44
41 S
100



45
46
85 S
17



47
48
87 S
76



49
50
73 S
17



51
52
70 S
100



53
54
84 S
12



55
56
84 S
100



57
58
91 S
100



59
60
56 S
100



61
62
72 S
65



63
64
87 S
20



359
360
63 S
79



67
68
82 S
19



69
70
66 S
72



71
72
83 S
13



73
74
75 S
26



325
326
87 S
12



75
76
39 S
42



77
78
85 S
23



79
80
85 S
14



257
258
51 S
71



81
82
73 S
51



259
260
51 S
46



335
336
65 S
69



83
84
86 S
10



85
86
66 S
20



261
262
77 S
100



87
88
90 S
16



361
362
67 S
76



89
90
44 S
47



297
298
69 S
100



91
92
65 S
81



267
268
72 S
100



93
94
90 S
17



95
96
66 S
22



271
272
53 S
38



97
98
93 S
100



273
274
84 S
22



275
276
 5 S
100



277
278
84 S
20



279
280
75 S
100



281
282
65 S
91



283
284
88 S
100



331
332
21 S
100



311
312
50 S
32



313
314
88 S
100



323
324
67 S
31



329
330
62 S
77



289
290
58 S
70



299
300
71 S
33



351
352
54 S
80



317
318
57 S
18



309
310
58 S
100



343
344
20 S
100



291
292
73 S
27



287
288
41 S
52



99
100
87 S
14



101
102
86 S
100



383
384
70 S
69



103
104
79 S
100



105
106
92 S
74



107
108
87 S
14



109
110
64 S
76



111
112
67 S
81



113
114
63 S
79



115
116
86 S
34



117
118
80 S
21


Different
119
120
87 S
9


subclone


Different
119
120
 7 S
100


subclone



121
122
74 S
21



123
124
86 S
12



385
386
63 S
58



125
126
86 S
23



303
304
68 S
100



127
128
73 S
25



129
130
75 S
24



131
132
76 S
22



133
134
88 S
18



135
136
65 S
91



113
114
87 S
20



143
144
60 S
47



145
146
74 S
34



149
150
75 S
100



151
152
74 S
31



153
154
69 S
100



155
156
69 S
74



157
158
62 S
100



159
160
 9 S
100



163
164
87 S
21


Different
165
166
76 S
31


subclone


Different
165
166
59 S
100


subclone



167
168
80 S
100



169
170
84 S
23



171
172
 8 S
100



173
174
78 S
67



175
176
84 S
23



177
178
100 S 
88



179
180
16 S
100



183
184
76 S
100



185
186
87 S
100



187
188
80 S
100



193
194
71 S
9



195
196
51 S
100



197
198
73 S
100



201
202
57 S
100



253
254
70 S
32



205
206
83 S
21



209
210
72 S
70



215
216
84 S
19



217
218
91 S
100



219
220
65 S
93



221
222
54 S
100



223
224
69 S
37



225
226
82 S
15



227
228
83 S
23


Clone
229
230
78 S
20


Subclone
229
230
74 S
100



231
232
81 S
21



233
234
84 S
19



235
236
61 S
82



237
238
51 S
90



239
240
89 S
16



241
242
24 S
66



243
244
88 S
16



245
246
74 S
23



247
248
72 S
78



249
250
93 S
100



251
252
71 S
17























2-amino hexanoic acid













Seq ID
Seq ID

EE %



DNA
Protein
Yield
(enantiomer)
















5
6
27%
 11% R



7
8
 9%
45% S



333
334
36%
 21% R



11
12
 9%
58% S



13
14
23%
 3% S



293
294
28%
  9% R



47
48
20%
15% S



55
56
27%
 14% R



61
62
 9%
46% S



261
262
17%
39% S



267
268
11%
83% S



97
98
21%
15% S



283
284
29%
 20% R



343
344
21%
 79% R



101
102
26%
  1% R



103
104
 8%
91% S



385
386
20%
 24% R



303
304
24%
13% S



145
146
29%
 10% R



159
160
14%
40% S



167
168
21%
16% S



169
170
12%
53% S



185
186
37%
29% S



187
188
25%
 13% R



189
190
14%
68% S



197
198
28%
 21% R



217
218
22%
 13% R



221
222
17%
54% S



249
250
20%
29% S










While the invention has been described in detail with reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood that modifications and variations are within the spirit and scope of that which is described and claimed.

## Claims

1. An isolated, synthetic, or recombinant nucleic acid that encodes a polypeptide having nitrilase activity consisting of:
(a) a nucleic acid sequence at least 85% identical to SEQ ID NO:103;
(b) a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a polypeptide comprising SEQ ID NO:104;
(c) a nucleic acid complementary to a full length of the nucleic acid sequence of (a) or (b).

2. A nucleic acid vector capable of replication in a host cell, wherein the vector comprises the nucleic acid of claim 1.

3. A host cell comprising the nucleic acid of claim 1.

4. A host organism comprising the host cell of claim 3; wherein the host organism is selected from a group comprising: a gram negative bacterium, a gram positive bacterium, or a eukaryotic organism.

5. An isolated, synthetic, or recombinant nucleic acid as comprising SEQ ID NO:103; wherein the nucleic acid encodes a polypeptide having a nitrilase activity.

6. An isolated, synthetic, or recombinant nucleic acid comprising SEQ ID NO:103; wherein the nucleic acid encodes a polypeptide having nitrilase activity and the polypeptide is SEQ ID NO:104.