alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.20





[English Summary]





Hua’an County Dadi Tulou Cluster Resources


Development and Cooperative Agreement and Supplements





Party A: Hua’an County Government


Party B: Hong Kong Yida International Investment Co., Ltd.





Term:


Party B shall be entitled to the operation and management rights of Hua’an Tulou Cluster resources (the “Resources”) for a period of 40 years from the date of execution of this Agreement.





Investment:


Party B shall invest no less than 20,000,000 RMB to the construction and development of the Resources in the first year and 100,000,000 RMB in the first six years, including fixed asset purchase and promotion.





Fees:





(1) As to Dadi Tulou Clusters:


When the ticket price of the Dadi Tulou Clusters is 60 RPM or above per person, the proportion paid by Party B to Party A shall be: (1) 16% of gross ticket sales in the first five years; (2) 20% of gross ticket sales in the second five years; (3) 23% of gross ticket sales in the third five years; (4) 25% of gross ticket sales in the fourth five years; (5) 28% of gross ticket sales in the fifth five years; and (6) 30% of gross ticket sales from the 26th year.





When the ticket price is less than 60 RPM, the proportion paid by Party B to Party A shall be reduced by 2% in each above category.





(2) As to other Resources that developed by Party B itself:


Party B shall pay to Party A certain percentage of its revenues: 5% in the first five years and 1% increase for every two years thereafter. However, the maximum shall be 10%.





Dispute:


If there is any dispute between the parties, both parties shall resolve the dispute through compromise settlement. If the parties cannot reach the settlement, then either party can resolve the dispute by the courts of Gulou County Fuzhou City or Hua’an County Zhangzhou City.





Date of the Agreement:


December 26, 2008





1
#### Frank Borzilleri, Plaintiff, *v.*Brockway Motor Truck Corporation and Others, Defendants.

Supreme Court, Monroe County,

March 17, 1925.

Pleadings — consolidation of actions — motion to consolidate with plaintiff’s action in Supreme Court defendants’ action in Rochester City Court — all issues may be tried in Supreme Court but not in Rochester City Court — consolidation ordered under Civil Practice Act, §§ 96, 97.

An action in the Rochester City Court should be consolidated with one in the Supreme Court, under sections 96 and 97 of the Civil Practice Act, where they both arise out of the same transaction and plaintiff’s claim in the Supreme Court action is for an amount which exceeds the jurisdiction of the Rochester City Court, with the result that the plaintiff cannot interpose his counterclaim in the City Court action.

Motion to consolidate actions.

*H. B. Thomas, for*the plaintiff.

*Harry A. Sessions,*for the defendants.

Rodenbeck, J.:

The action in the City Court of Rochester should be consolidated with that in the Supreme Court. Both grew out of the same transaction, the collision of a motor truck and an automobile. The plaintiff in the Supreme Court action has a claim arising out of the collision in an amount which exceeds the jurisdiction of the City Court so that the plaintiff cannot interpose his counterclaim in that action. He should not be compelled to reduce his claim to the jurisdiction of that court. Two trials growing out of the same facts will be necessary unless the actions are consolidated and to avoid this waste of time the actions should be consolidated. Each party will have the burden of establishing his cause of action. There are also other defendants in the Supreme Court action who are not involved in the City Court action. The defendant gains nothing by a speedy trial in the City Court as it will be obliged to meet the plaintiff’s action in the Supreme Court when reached. All the issues can be tried out in the Supreme Court but not in the City Court and the case is a proper one for consolidation. (Civ. Frac. Act, §§ 96, 97.)

Motion granted.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Paul J. van der Wansem, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BTU International, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 7, 2006       /s/ Paul J. van der Wansem Paul J. van der Wansem
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2043 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, 

National Labor Relations Board, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, National Labor Relations Board, Salaries 

and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 RELATED AGENCIES, NATIONAL LABOR RELA5 TIONS BOARD, SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR 

6 FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Related Agencies, National Labor Relations 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2043 IH

1 Board, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may 

2 not exceed $274,224,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 3.1(F)

                          CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO
                SECOND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
                          DORAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                          (REGISTRATION NUMBER 29,324)



         Doral Financial Corporation (the "Corporation"), a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, does
hereby certify:

         FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation,
duly held and convened on January 25, 1999, resolutions were duly adopted
approving proposed amendments (the "Amendments") to the Corporation's Second
Restated Certificate of Incorporation and declaring said Amendments advisable
to (i) increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 50,000,000
to 200,000,000 shares and (ii) increase the number of authorized shares of
serial preferred stock from 2,000,000 to 10,000,000 shares.

         SECOND: That at a Meeting of Shareholders of the Corporation held on
April 22, 1999, adjourned and reconvened on May 13, 1999, the inspectors of
election appointed for the purpose of conducting and tabulating the votes of
the shareholders for and against the adoption of the Amendments, executed and
delivered a certificate to the effect that more than a majority of the issued
and outstanding stock of the Corporation entitled to vote on the Amendments
voted in favor of each of said Amendments.

         THIRD: That the Amendments have been adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Article 8.02 of the Puerto Rico General Corporation Law of 1995.

         FOURTH: That the first paragraph of Article FOURTH of the Second
Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety
as follows:

                  "FOURTH: The total number of shares of all classes of stock
         which the Corporation is authorized to issue is 210,000,000 shares,
         consisting of 200,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $1.00 par value, and
         10,000,000 shares of Serial Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value."


<PAGE>   2




         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Doral Financial Corporation has caused its
corporate seal to be hereunto affixed and this Certificate to be signed by
Zoila Levis, its President and Richard F. Bonini, its Secretary, this 13th day
of May, 1999.


                                                /s/ Zoila Levis
                                                -------------------------
                                                       Zoila Levis
                                                        President


[Corporate Seal]
                                                /s/ Richard F. Bonini
                                                -------------------------
                                                    Richard F. Bonini
                                                        Secretary


                                       2
#### Candido Viliebre OCAMPO and Olga Libia Cienfuegos Cardenas, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-72062.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 17, 2007.*

Filed Dec. 21, 2007.

John Stephen Glaser, Esq., Manulkin Glaser & Bennett, Fountain Valley, CA, for Petitioners.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, REINHARDT and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of a motion to reconsider its decision denying cancellation of removal.

*957We have considered petitioners’ response to this court’s September 10, 2007, order to show cause why the petition should not be summarily denied pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 3—6(b).

Petitioners contend the BIA abused its discretion and violated their due process rights by failing to find error in the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) refusal to hear testimony concerning petitioners’ length of residence in the United States. However, as the BIA noted, the BIA and the IJ were aware of the length of time petitioners resided in the United States by the ages of them American-born children. In addition, the record contained written evidence of them length of residence. The BIA therefore did not violate petitioners’ due process rights and was within its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1); *Socop-Gonzalez v. INS,*272 F.3d 1176, 1180 n. 2 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc). In any event, this court lacks jurisdiction to review the immigration judge’s and BIA’s decision that petitioners failed to show the requisite hardship. *See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003). Accordingly, the petition is summarily denied. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

The temporary stay of removal and voluntary depai’ture confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS G. FLORES-PACHECO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-70733

Agency No. A075-251-422

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2014** 

Before: LEAVY, FISHER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Carlos G. Flores-Pacheco, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum and

withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

FILED

DEC 4 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453

F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.

Flores-Pacheco contends the agency erred in finding he did not have an

objective basis to fear persecution based on his father’s past political activity.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Flores-Pacheco

failed to establish a well-founded fear of persecution on account of a protected

ground. See Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1095-96 (9th Cir. 2002)

(insufficient evidence to show reasonable fear of future persecution); see also

Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2009) (the REAL ID Act

“requires that a protected ground represent ‘one central reason’ for an asylum

applicant’s persecution”); Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010)

(“[a]n alien’s desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or

random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”). Thus,

Flores-Pacheco’s asylum claim fails.

Because Flores-Pacheco failed to meet the lower standard of proof for

asylum, his claim for withholding of removal necessarily fails. See Zehatye, 453

F.3d at 1190.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 13-70733
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ERIC D. BLACKMON, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION: 15-00223-KD-C

)

HUNTINGTON INGALLS, )

Defendant. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no 

objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(l)(B) and dated August 24, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss or in the alternative to 

transfer venue (Doc. 6) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: DENIED as to 

the motion to dismiss; and GRANTED as to the motion to transfer venue such that this case is 

hereby TRANSFERRED in its entirety to the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of Mississippi pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1406. 

The Clerk is DIRECTED to TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Mississippi, Southern Division.

DONE and ORDERED this the 16th day of September 2015.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:15-cv-00223-KD-C Document 14 Filed 09/16/15 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1890 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1890

   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of 
      Representatives, Salaries and Expenses of the Office of the 
                 Parliamentarian for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of 
      Representatives, Salaries and Expenses of the Office of the 
                 Parliamentarian for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR HOUSE OF 
              REPRESENTATIVES, SALARIES AND EXPENSES OF THE OFFICE OF 
              THE PARLIAMENTARIAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for House of Representatives, 
Salaries and Expenses of the Office of the Parliamentarian for fiscal 
year 2024 may not exceed $2,026,000.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Agency for International Development

# AGENCY:

United States Agency for International Development.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid (ACVFA).

Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2015.

Time: 2:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m.

Location: Ronald Reagan Building, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC 20004.

## Purpose

The Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid (ACVFA) brings together USAID and private voluntary organizations (PVO) officials, representatives from universities, international nongovernment organizations (NGOs), U.S. businesses, and government, multilateral, and private organizations to foster understanding, communication, and cooperation in the area of foreign aid.

## Agenda

                        USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah will make opening remarks, followed by panel discussions among ACVFA members and USAID leadership on the Post-2014 and Financing for Development agendas. The full meeting agenda will be forthcoming on the ACVFA Web site at                         *http://www.usaid.gov/​who-we-are/​organization/​advisory-committee.*

## Stakeholders

                        The meeting is free and open to the public. Persons wishing to attend should register online at                         *http://ow.ly/​wlC6G.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jayne Thomisee, 202-712-5506.

Dated: December 16, 2014.

Jayne Thomisee,

Executive Director & Policy Advisor, U.S. Agency for International Development.

[FR Doc. 2014-30291 Filed 12-29-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
```

                PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Provident  Financial Group, Inc.  ("Provident") on Form 10-Q
for the period ending June 30, 2003 (the  "Report"),  I,  Christopher  J. Carey,
Chief Financial Officer  (Principal  Financial  Officer) of Provident,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

   (1)The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Provident.

/s/ Christopher J. Carey
------------------------
Christopher J. Carey
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

August 14, 2003

[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Provident  Financial  Group,  Inc. and will be retained by Provident
Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.]
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of FieldPoint Petroleum Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A-1 for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ray Reaves, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  _/s/ Ray Reaves_____ Ray Reaves Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer November 20, 2009