alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 78559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30310]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration


Reports, Forms and Record Keeping Requirements Agency Information 
Collection Activity Under OMB Review

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department 
of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the docket number in a Federal Register 
notice published on Tuesday, November 25, 2014, that announced a 
request for public comment on proposed collection of information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Randy Reid, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, NHTSA, Room W48-311, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 
Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Reid's telephone number is (202) 366-4383 and 
his email address is <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4537242b213c6b37202c2105212a316b222a33"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4b392a252f3265392e222f0b2f243f652c243d">[email protected]</span></a>.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of November 25, 2014, in FR Doc. 2014-2127-
0008, on page 70275, column 1 needs to be read:
    U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2014-0124.

 Correction

    In the Federal Register of November 25, 2014, in FR Doc. 2014-2127-
0008, on page 70275, column 2 before the Title: Consumer Complaint 
Information, needs to read:
    OMB Control Number: 2127-0008

    Issued on: November 25, 2014.
Randy Reid,
Chief, Correspondence Research Division, Office of Defects 
Investigation.
[FR Doc. 2014-30310 Filed 12-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DENNIS BROWN, III, #108821 *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

vs. * CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-00334-KD-B

*

CYNTHIA STEWART, et al., *

 *

*

Defendants. *

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue 

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this 

Court. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to 

obey the Court’s order. 

DONE this the 22nd day of December 2015.

s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00334-KD-B Document 9 Filed 12/23/15 Page 1 of 1
Order entered January 12, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 00921
- CR
NYLON DERAYSHUN HART , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Cri minal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F15
- 33640
- H



### O RDER The reporter’s record was filed December 8, 2017 . After reviewing the record, we note that the following five State’s exhibits are missing: exhibit 26, Brandon Taylo r Video Interview; exhibit 27, CD of Cell phone Records; exhibit 30, Nylon Hart Video Interview; exhibit 33, DVD YouTube Video; and exhibit 34, DVD YouTube Video. We ORDER court reporter Marissa Garza to file, within FOURTEEN DAYS of the date of this ord er, a supplemental reporter’s record containing playable copies of the State’s exhibits 26, 27, 30, 33, and 34.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Davon White, Appellant.

[964 NYS2d 34]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert G. Seewald, J. at plea; John Collins, J. at sentencing), rendered March 18, 2011, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender, to a term of three years, unanimously affirmed.

The sentencing court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea *(see generally People v Frederick,*45 NY2d 520 [1978]). The motion was based entirely on postplea information about a testing chemist’s misconduct, which allegedly undermined the People’s ability to prove the identity of the drugs defendant sold. This information did not tend to establish defendant’s innocence. Instead, it constituted impeachment material *(see People v Holloway,*33 AD3d 442 [1st Dept 2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 902 [2006]).

Furthermore, the People assured the court that they could *580have still established the identity of the drugs by way of several forms of untainted evidence. “[T]he nature and extent of the fact-finding procedures on such motions rest largely in. the discretion of the court” *(People v Fiumefreddo,*82 NY2d 536, 544 [1993]). Accordingly, the sentencing court was not obligated to conduct a minitrial on the issue of the identity of the drugs.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal *(see People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248 [2006]). Regardless of whether defendant validly waived his right to appeal, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur—Tom, J.E, Sweeny, Saxe, Román and Feinman, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2041 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2041

   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related 
Agencies, The Institute of Museum and Library Services for fiscal year 
                                 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
   referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in 
 addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related 
Agencies, The Institute of Museum and Library Services for fiscal year 
                                 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RELATED AGENCIES, 
              THE INSTITUTE OF MUSEUM AND LIBRARY SERVICES FOR FISCAL 
              YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Related Agencies, The 
Institute of Museum and Library Services for fiscal year 2024 may not 
exceed $242,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
fo; TW VUnorcJ^ COURTOFOECMlK/AL APPEALS

MOUU COOOg rOojd^7>o^ftiWj-6oJ. faking This htr^aro^hk.

Cou*4 J-q CLLC^t /7)s,Loncf nncrff\h for my ?Z)fc f*ter f>9y ffio Je

r?~b^m^h^n T hid Hoi l<lnouj JfrOStLo^ ujqj- //, f&cj £o/'^

~7c> £>/i /? P.DtlZ f'h my b^hc^lf Do To ft Lfrcic of QDmrniMwoo&U^

OJO& MiSLxn&trrhknAt'nyt So ^T ^°^ /fr£- 7%^ /Alt ifo^o^ik

for Di5C/^-l/ooc^Y ^'^^ '/ft POy 'B'tLhcA.lf and 'D^r^^Ko.rJ

hvj TVoJe, fyy&h^h fos D/V(ye-[W<^y fa/eu, ^ FILED IN "^ • eoURTo^7?aALAPPEALS-

~^7^h^V0ul ^ " ^ -0CTT672CT5

"T^ando Z?ari&i2u0*YUL. Abel Acoste, Clerk.

—RECEIVED IW

JfflUBUQECfilMWAL APPEALS.

- OCU 6 2015
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-3675

___________

Joyce M. Clinkscale, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Western District of Missouri.

*

JoAnne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of * [UNPUBLISHED]

Social Security Administration, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: April 22, 2002

 Filed: April 29, 2002

___________

Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Joyce M. Clinkscale applied for Social Security disability insurance benefits,

alleging disability since September 1997 from carpal tunnel syndrome surgery; severe

pain in her hands, wrists, arms, shoulders, neck, and chest; finger numbness; and

wrist swelling. After two administrative hearings, an administrative law judge (ALJ)

denied her application, finding that Clinkscale could not perform her past relevant

work but could perform jobs a vocational expert (VE) identified in response to the
1

The HONORABLE WILLIAM A. KNOX, United States Magistrate Judge for

the Western District of Missouri.

-2-

ALJ’s work hypothetical. Clinkscale appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the

denial of benefits. After careful review, we conclude that substantial evidence in the

administrative record supports the Commissioner’s decision and therefore affirm. See

Roberts v. Apfel, 222 F.3d 466, 468 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review).

Clinkscale argues the ALJ ignored evidence of fibromyalgia. We disagree.

The ALJ included fibromyalgia as one of her severe impairments, and the medical

evidence did not establish that the condition was disabling. Clinkscale further argues

the ALJ failed to consider each of the factors listed in Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d

1320, 1322 (8th Cir. 1984). The ALJ need not methodically discuss each Polaksi

factor, however, as long as the factors are acknowledged and examined. See Lowe

v. Apfel, 226 F.3d 969, 972 (8th Cir. 2000). The ALJ’s credibility findings were

adequately explained and supported. Finally, Clinkscale challenges the ALJ’s

residual-functional-capacity (RFC) findings and his hypothetical to the VE. The RFC

findings were consistent with limitations recommended by an occupational health

physician and a rehabilitation specialist, respectively. See Anderson v. Shalala, 51

F.3d 777, 779 (8th Cir. 1995). The ALJ’s hypothetical properly included the

impairments that were supported by substantial evidence and accepted as true by ALJ,

see Hunt v. Massanari, 250 F.3d 622, 625 (8th Cir. 2001), and the VE’s response

provided substantial evidence that Clinkscale was not disabled, see Haggard v. Apfel,

175 F.3d 591, 595 (8th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Brian J. Martin,
President (chief executive officer) of the managing owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor Trust IISeries E (Series E), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Es Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series E.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Brian J. Martin                                                                     
|                                                                                        
|Brian J. Martin President (chief executive officer) of the Managing Owner March 30,
2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DARRELL WILLIAMS-BEY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION 15-0176-CG-N

)

BRIAN S. HOLLINGHEAD, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be and is 

hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED this 1st day of December, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00176-CG-N Document 17 Filed 12/01/15 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Crystalix Group International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert McDermott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ ROBERT MCDERMOTT
---------------------------------------
Robert McDermott
Chief Financial Officer
| Participant      Name:      |   | ___________                                                                                                                       |
|-----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   |                                                                                                                              |
| Number      of Stock Units: |   | ______(1)                                                                                                                         |
|                        |   |                                                                                                                              |
| Vesting      Schedule:      |   | See      vesting set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto(1)                                                                   |
|                        |   |                                                                                                                              |
| Award      Date:            |   | ____________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ |

----

----

----

----

| INTERNATIONAL      RECTIFIER             |   | PARTICIPANT                |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|
| CORPORATION, a Delaware      corporation |   |                       |   |
|                                     |   |                       |   |
| By:                                      |   |                       |   |   |
|                                     |   | Signature                  |   |
| Print      Name:                         |   |                       |   |   |
|                                     |   | Address                    |   |
| Its:                                     |   |                       |   |   |
|                                     |   | City,      State, Zip Code |   |
|                                     |   |                       |   |   |

----

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         notice that was originally published on December 10, 2014, (Volume 79, Number 237, Page 73404) the meeting location was inadvertently omitted. The location of the meeting is: Little Rock, Arkansas.                    

# DATES:

The meetings will be held Monday, January 12, 2015 and Tuesday, January 13, 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kim Vinci at 1-888-912-1227 or 916-974-5086.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting with the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Special Projects Committee will be held Monday, January 12, 2015, from 1:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., and Tuesday, January 13, 2015, from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Central Time in Little Rock, Arkansas. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Notification of intent to participate must be made with Kim Vinci. For more information please contact: Kim Vinci at 1-888-912-1227 or 916-974-5086, TAP Office, 4330 Watt Ave., Sacramento, CA 95821, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                

The agenda will include a discussion on various special topics with IRS processes.

Dated: December 16, 2014.

Otis Simpson,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2014-30094 Filed 12-22-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
RESIGNATION LETTER


 


May 26, 2015


 


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of


Go Public I, Inc.,


 


Gentlemen:


 


This letter serves as notice that as of the
date hereof, I hereby resign from my position as President, Director, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary,
and Treasurer of Go Public II, Inc. (the “Corporation”). My resignation is not the result of any disagreement with
the Corporation on any matter relating to its operation, policies (including accounting or financial policies) or practices.


 


Sincerely,


 /s/
Thomas DeNunzio


Thomas
DeNunzio
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form 10-QSB of Kent  Financial  Services,  Inc. for the three months ended March
31,  1997 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000316028
<NAME>                          KENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                           6,990
<SECURITIES>                     5,894
<RECEIVABLES>                      683
<ALLOWANCES>                         0
<INVENTORY>                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                13,567
<PP&E>                           1,656
<DEPRECIATION>                     386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  14,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            1,536
<BONDS>                              0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                           104
<OTHER-SE>                      12,812
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    14,992
<SALES>                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   505
<CGS>                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 1,031
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  52
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (578)
<INCOME-TAX>                       (47)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (531)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                      (531)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.51)
        


</TABLE>
#### Adeline Morris *v.*Jane Smith et al.

Descent and Distribution — Evidence—‘Relationship.

The evidence was held to show that the party in possession of land of the decedent was his daughter and that she was entitled to share in the distribution of the estate.

APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

June 16, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

The order dismissing the action instituted in the year 1865, constitutes no bar to the present proceeding. The proof under the first action indicated clearly that the father of these children was alive within three or four years prior to its filing, and no cause of action existed on their part until after his death. There is no doubt but what the present plaintiff and James Smith, her brother, were the children of James Smith, senior, who left Louisville many years ago for California. He had also been twice married; and the real question in the case is whether the party now in possession, the appellee, was his daughter. The evidence in the present case establishes the fact that he is dead; and therefore all of his children are entitled to equal ■ interests in the estate left by him. The fact *736that in obtaining the marriage license, the maiden name of the appellee was given as Malone instead of Smith, tends to strengthen the position assumed by the plaintiff, that their father left but the two children; still there is a mystery connected with this last marriage, and, in fact, both marriages, established alone by reason of celebration and the general understanding of those who knew the parties, as to the relation subsisting between them. 'Smith recognized the appellee as his child by repeated declarations to that effect made to those who knew him well; not only so, but he permitted her to remain in the possession of that property for more than twenty years, and it is hardly to be supposed that, unless he recognized the relation of parent and child, he would have surrendered, or rather permitted the appellee to remain in the undisturbed possession of the property to the exclusion of the other children. The proof conduces to show that after the father left, the appellant lived for a time with the appellee; and the parent no doubt believed they were all using and enjoying what property he owned and left in their possession upon his departure for California. We are satisfied from the evidence that Mrs. Morris, James Smith and the appellee are the owners of the property in controversy. The judgment of the court below is reversed and cause remanded with directions to sell the property and distribute the proceeds, and for further proceedings consistent herewith.

*I. G. Wilson, for appellant.*

*Walker, for appellees.*