alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>                     
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000  
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                          3,047   
<SECURITIES>                                   10,856
<RECEIVABLES>                                   8,209
<ALLOWANCES>                                      386
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               22,669
<PP&E>                                          6,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,842
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 26,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           7,045
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                       271
<COMMON>                                          124
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,384
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   26,824
<SALES>                                        10,698
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               14,131
<CGS>                                             746 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  132
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,762)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,762)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0 
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,762)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)
        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1933 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Labor, 

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal 

year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Labor, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION BENEFIT 

5 GUARANTY CORPORATION, SALARIES AND 

6 EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Department of Labor, Pension Benefit Guaranty 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1933 IH

1 Corporation, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 

2 may not exceed $0. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0371

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

MICKEY RODNEY PAYNE,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Donald L. Harris, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 18 2021

08/18/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0371
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1862 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Inquiries 

and Investigations Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Inquiries and Investigations Expenses for fiscal year 

2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 SENATE, INQUIRIES AND INVESTIGATIONS 

5 EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:36 Apr 13, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1862.IH H1862

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1862 IH

1 able for Senate, Inquiries and Investigations Expenses for 

2 fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $133,265,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

ROBERT DUNKLIN, * 

(AIS # 227652) * 

 * 

 Plaintiff, * 

 * 

vs. * CIVIL ACTION 14-00520-KD-N 

 * 

KENNEDY HARDEN, * 

 * 

 Defendant. * 

ORDER 

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to 

the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 7) of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)

and dated January 22, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. 

Accordingly, this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court 

for the Middle District of Alabama.1 

DONE this 23rd day of February 2015. 

s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

1

 Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed without prepayment of fees (Doc. 4), which was granted. 

(Doc. 5) Subsequently, plaintiff paid the assessed partial filing fee of $4.43. (Doc. 6) 

Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to send the partial filing fee to the United States District 

Court for the Middle District of Alabama at the time this action is transferred. 

Case 1:14-cv-00520-KD-N Document 8 Filed 02/23/15 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.5


 


 





AMENDMENT TO THE


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


 


This Amendment (“Amendment”)
is entered into as of the 27th day of May 2015, by and between Home Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”) and Scott A.
Ridley (the “Executive”).


 


WITNESSETH


 


WHEREAS, the
Bank and the Executive previously entered into an Employment Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2014 (the “Agreement”);
and


 


WHEREAS, the
parties desire to amend the Agreement in order to extend its term, as provided in Section 2(b) thereof.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:


 


1.     The
last sentence in Section 2(a) of the Agreement is amended and restated to read as follows: “The terms and conditions of this
Agreement shall be and remain in effect during the period beginning on the Effective Date of this Agreement and ending on June
22, 2017, plus such extensions, if any, as are provided pursuant to Section 2(b) hereof (the “Employment Period”).”


 


2.     Except
to the extent expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue unmodified and shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Amendment has been duly executed by the parties hereto as of the day and year first written above.


 


	 	HOME BANK, N.A.
	 	 
	 	 
	 	By:   /s/ John W. Bordelon
	 	John W. Bordelon
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 
	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ Scott A. Ridley
	 	Scott A. Ridley
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 24, 2009 

s0217 

Order 

 

February 24, 2009 

137524 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137524 

 COA: 284488 

Wayne CC: 03-001961 

KEVIN POTTER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 29, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of World Monitor Trust II  Series F for the period October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer        
|Kenneth A. Shewer            
|Co-Chief Executive Officer   
|(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: March 20, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

# NAME:

 Advisory Committee for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (#66).

# DATE/TIME:

 January 23, 2015: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

# PLACE:

 National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1235, Arlington, Virginia 22230.

                        To help facilitate your entry into the building, contact Sara Dwyer (                        *sdwyer@nsf.gov*). Your request should be received on or prior to January 16, 2014.                    

                        Virtual attendance will be supported. For detailed instructions, visit the meeting Web site at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​events/​event_​summ.jsp?​cntn_​id=​130169&​org=​MPS.*

# TYPE OF MEETING:

 OPEN, VIRTUAL.

# CONTACT PERSON:

 Eduardo Misawa, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1005, Arlington, Virginia 22230, 703-292-5353 and Sara Dwyer, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1005, Arlington, Virginia 22230, 703-292-4934.

                        Minutes                        *:*                         Meeting minutes and other information may be obtained from the Staff Associate and MPSAC Designated Federal Officer at the above address or the Web site at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​mps/​advisory.jsp.*

# PURPOSE OF MEETING: 

To study data, programs, policies, and other information pertinent to the National Science Foundation and to provide advice and recommendations concerning research in mathematics and physical sciences.

## Agenda

    - State of the Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS): Challenges and Opportunities
    - Reports from current subcommittees
    - Public-Private Partnerships
    - Report from MPS Liaisons to NSF Advisory Committees

Dated: December 18, 2014.

Suzanne Plimpton,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2014-30038 Filed 12-23-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### MEHADRIN DAIRY CORPORATION, Appellant, v. SLIM ‘N TRIM, INC., Appellee.

No. 01-1249.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 19, 2001.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2000 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health 

and Human Services, National Institutes of Health Buildings and Facilities for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health Buildings and Facilities for fiscal year 

2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2000 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV3 ICES, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH 

4 BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES FOR FISCAL 

5 YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Department of Health and Human Services, Na9 tional Institutes of Health Buildings and Facilities for fis10 cal year 2024 may not exceed $200,000,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-96889, 333-48560, 333-41648 and 333-88817) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Plan, 1999 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, 1999 Directors Stock Option Plan and 2000 Non-Executive Stock Option Plan of Foundry Networks, Inc. of our report dated January 26, 2004,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Foundry Networks, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003.




/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Palo Alto, California March 12, 2004

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2616

DONALD R. TERRY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DIRECTOR, COMPLAINT ADJUDICATION DIVISION,

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,

OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-98-222)

Submitted: January 26, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald R. Terry, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Anson Rhine, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia; Lisa J. Banks, EQUAL

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Donald R. Terry appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his complaint against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Terry v. Director, Complaint Adjudication

Div., No. CA-98-222 (E.D. Va. Sept. 28, 1998). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          71,801
<SECURITIES>                                    17,914
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                        75
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,038
<PP&E>                                           2,689
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,501
<BONDS>                                            612
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,538
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,225
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,483
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    75
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,054)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,054)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,054)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.65)


</TABLE>
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

WALKER DIGITAL, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, LLC, CAPITAL ONE 

BANK (USA), N.A., and CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL 

CORPORATION, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

____________________ 

2010-1553 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Virginia in Case No 10-CV-0212, 

Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

RODERICK G. DORMAN, Hennigan, Bennett & Dorman, 

LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiffappellant. With him on the brief were LAWRENCE M.

HADLEY, ALAN P. BLOCK, THOMAS B. WATSON and MIEKE 

K. MALMBERG. 
CHARLES S. BARQUIST, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, of 

Los Angeles, California, argued for defendants-appellees. 

With him on the brief were RYAN J. MALLOY; and DEANNE 

E. MAYNARD and JOHN P. CORRADO, of Washington, DC. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and LINN, Circuit 

Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 28, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CORNELIUS SMITH, et al., )

 )

Plaintiffs, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION 14-0107-WS-B

 )

WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC., )

 )

Defendant. )

ORDER 

Plaintiff William Newton and the defendant have filed a joint motion for 

approval of settlement agreement. (Doc. 123). “When employees bring a private 

action for back wages under the FLSA, and present to the district court a proposed 

settlement, the district court may enter a stipulated judgment after scrutinizing the 

settlement for fairness.” Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 

1353 (11th Cir. 1982). “[T]he rule of Lynn’s Food Stores applies to settlements 

between former employees and employers” just as it does to agreements by current 

employees. Nall v. Mal-Motels, Inc., 723 F.3d 1304, 1307 (11th Cir. 2013). 

The Court is unusually familiar with this case, as it has entered numerous 

rulings on the substantive motions presented by the parties, both in this case and in 

Pritchett v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., Civil Action No. 12-0182-WS-C. In light of 

this familiarity, the Court is unable to conclude that the settlement with Newton is 

fair and reasonable. Each of the plaintiffs here and in Pritchett appears to be in 

essentially the same position regarding the strengths and weaknesses of his or her 

case, yet the settlement with Newton leaves him far worse off than the other 

settling plaintiffs, for no reason the Court can discern or imagine.

David Foster, whose settlement the Court has approved by separate order, 

will receive under that settlement over 91% of the non-liquidated damages he 

Case 1:14-cv-00107-WS-B Document 128 Filed 07/27/15 Page 1 of 2
2

would receive were he to prevail at trial on both the workweek and lunch break 

issues. (Doc. 122 at 4). Each of the twelve plaintiffs in Pritchett received 

approximately 106% of the non-liquidated damages they would have received had 

they prevailed at trial on these issues. (Pritchett, Doc. 127 at 4-6). Newton, in 

contrast, would receive under the proposed settlement only 22% of what he would 

be awarded under the same circumstances. While there is of course a range of 

reasonable outcomes in any case, the parties have not persuaded the Court that a 

settlement awarding Newton less than a quarter of what all other plaintiffs have 

received falls within that range.

For the reasons set forth above, the joint motion for approval of settlement 

agreement is denied.

DONE and ORDERED this 27th day of July, 2015.

s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00107-WS-B Document 128 Filed 07/27/15 Page 2 of 2
September 2, 20 15 Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion , ChiefJustice Fourth Court ofAppeals Cadena-Reeves Justice Center 300 Dolorosa, Suite 3200 San Antonio, Texas 78205 Re. : Court ofAppeals Number: 04-14-00807-CV Trial Court Case Number: M-12-0045-CV -A 

### Aery, eta!. vs. Hoskins, Inc., eta!. Dear Hon. Justice Bryan Marion: 

# I 

# - • UHLI FITZS I MONS/ jEWETT 

## & BURTON/ PLLC 4040 Broadway, Suite 430 San Antonio, Texas 78209 T 210.829 . 1660 F 2 1 0 .829 . 164 1

In response to the Court's letter of July 30, 2015, please be advised that Appellee Blake C. Hoskins will yield his oral argument time to Ellen Mitchell, counsel for Appellees C. Clifton Hoskins and Hoskins, Inc.

EAJ/eaj

{739/003/00108097.DOCX;l} Sincerely,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW ufjblaw.com ACCEPTED 04-14-00807-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3/2015 9:03:17 AM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK