alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the annual report of Internet Gold-Golden Lines Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Doron Turgeman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Doron Turgeman*


Doron Turgeman


Chief Executive Officer




April 24, 2013





*           The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.





This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 243 (Thursday, December 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 75609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


Geo Finance Corporation; Order of Suspension of Trading

December 16, 2014.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Geo Finance Corporation (``Geo Finance'') because of concerns regarding 
the accuracy and adequacy of information in the marketplace and 
potentially manipulative activity related to Geo Finance common stock. 
Geo Finance is a Florida corporation with its principal place of 
business located in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Its stock is quoted on 
OTC Link, (previously ``Pink Sheets'') operated by OTC Markets Group 
Inc., under the ticker symbol: GEFI.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the 
above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST, on 
December 16, 2014 through 11:59 p.m. EST, on December 30, 2014.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29729 Filed 12-16-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

BULOVA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen L. Gurba, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Stephen L. GurbaStephen L. GurbaPrincipal Executive Officer
August 23, 2010
Exhibit 32.2

BULOVA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John D. Stanton, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John D. StantonJohn D. StantonPrincipal Financial Officer
June 25, 2010
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18.U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

The undersigned officer of FieldPoint Petroleum Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies that:

i.     the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

ii.     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 16, 2004

/s/ Ray Reaves                              Ray Reaves
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form 10-QSB of Kent Financial Services, Inc. for the nine months ended September
30,  1997 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such  financial
statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                           0000316028                     
<NAME>                                          KENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1000
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,168
<SECURITIES>                                     5,124
<RECEIVABLES>                                      664
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,956
<PP&E>                                           1,665
<DEPRECIATION>                                     410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,312
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           102
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,351
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,531
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (865)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (85)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (780)  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (780)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.76)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GUS JOHNSON, # 108854, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 15-4-WS-C

A. PACHEO, et al., :

Defendants. :

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be and is hereby 

DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and 1915A(b)(1)

as malicious. 

DONE this 20th day of February, 2015.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00004-WS-C Document 8 Filed 02/20/15 Page 1 of 1
----

|   | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|              | By: /s/ Lawrence Fensterstock                                                                         |
|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              |              Lawrence Fensterstock   |
|              |              Chief Financial Officer |
|              |                                                                                                  |
| November 12, 2010 |                                                                                                  |

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of OMNOVA Solutions Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                       |  |                                                 |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: January 24, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Kevin M. McMullen
|                       |  |  |  |                       |  | Name:                                           |  | Kevin M. McMullen                                
|                       |  |  |  | Title:                |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  |                       |  | /s/ Michael E. Hicks                           
|                       |  |  |  |                       |  | Name:                                           |  | Michael E. Hicks                                 
|                       |  |  |  |                       |  | Title:                                          |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Alfred Butt, et al., *v.*James Boren, et al.

Mental Capacity — Evidence.

The opinions of witnesses as to mental capacity are not entitled to much weight unless the facts upon which they are based are given.

Joinder of Causes of Action.

A suit to enforce the settlement of an administrator’s accounts cannot he joined with a suit to set aside a deed.

*833APPEAL PROM SIMPSON CIRCUIT COURT.

October 5, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

Many of the witnesses who testified on the part of appellants gave it as their opinion that Francis Boren, the grantor, at the date of the deed in contest was, from his great age and physical weakness, childish and mentally incapable to understand and to transact important business; but from an inability and a failure to state the facts upon which they base their opinions, except the advanced age of the grantor, their mere opinions cannot be allowed to overturn the evidence of witnesses who saw and conversed with the grantor shortly before and after the making of the deed, and who prove facts which could not exist if the mental capacity of Francis Boren was as frail as the opposing witnesses considered it.

For an example, Mrs. Bush, who seems to be a very intelligent woman, proves facts showing that F. Boren had not only a distinct memory of important facts relating to the title to her land, but communicated them to her in a satisfactory manner, and so effectually as to enable her to succeed in removing difficulties in the title to her land.

Eubank proves that he went to see the old gentleman in 1872, after the date of the contested paper, and conversed with him on the business for which he went to see.him; that he conversed very intelligently ; and he afterwards took his deposition to prove the marriage of his mother, the time and place, etc., all of which he related with great accuracy, and he was intelligent on all other subjects about which he conversed with him.

The draftsman of the instrument also proves facts that occurred at the time he wrote it that show the old gentleman entirely competent to thoroughly understand the business he was engaged in.

Upon the subject of undue influence, it may suffice to remark that there is no evidence that the beneficiary in the deed ever spoke to his father on the subject, or attempted to influence him in any way whatever. So far as this record shows, the deed was the voluntary and independent act of a man fully competent to do it.

The suit (if any exists) against James Boren to enforce a settlement of his accounts as administrator of Francis Boren, Jr., was improperly joined with the suit to set aside the deed of Francis Boren, Sr., to appellee, James Boren.

*834
      *G. W. Whitesides, A. Duvall, for appellants.*

*W. P. D. Bush, T. Lee Wilkerson, for appellees.*

Judgment *affirmed.*
Exhibit 99(b)


                         Independent Accountants' Report
                         -------------------------------

The Board of Directors
Household Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of consumer
automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust III, Series
1999-1 has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer,
in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of
the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated June 1, 1999 (the Agreement), as
supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002. Household Finance
Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the
servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and
conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Agreement, as supplemented,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the receivables has
been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in
compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of
the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated June 1, 1999, as supplemented, as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material
respects.



                                       /s/ KPMG LLP
                                       KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2003
<PAGE>

                              Management Assertion
                              --------------------


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, the servicing of consumer
automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust III, Series
1999-1 has been conducted by Household Auto Finance, a division of Household
Finance Corporation, in its capacity as subservicer for Household Finance
Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as
set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated
June 1, 1999, as supplemented.



/s/ TIM CONDON                              /s/ JOHN O'BRIEN
-----------------------------------         -----------------------------------
Tim Condon                                  John O'Brien
Chief Financial Officer-                    Group Director- Asset Management-
Household Auto Finance                      Household Auto Finance

February 28, 2003                           February 28, 2003
-----------------------------------         -----------------------------------
Date                                        Date
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JUAN MARK JONES, ) 

#10579-003 )

 )

Petitioner, ) CRIMINAL NO. 09-017-KD-B

 ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-008-KD-B

vs. )

 )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

 )

Defendant. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue 

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and dated March 1, 2016, is ADOPTED

as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Jones’ Motion To Vacate, Set Aside, Or 

Correct Sentence under § 2255 (Doc. 105) be DENIED and that Jones is not entitled to the 

issuance of a certificate of appealability or to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

DONE and ORDERED this 11th day of April 2016.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cr-00017-KD-B Document 112 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

<pageID>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of FieldPoint Petroleum Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ray Reaves, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  __/s/ Ray Reaves______ Ray Reaves Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer May 12, 2010
EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our reports dated January 12, 2004 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the 2003 Annual Report of Community Bancorp of
New Jersey on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. We hereby consent
to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements
of Community Bancorp of New Jersey on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-102656, effective
January 22, 2003 and File No. 333-94839, effective November 12, 1999).


/S/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 30, 2004
#### Fischer *v.*Hayes.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

August 15, 1889.)

Patents for Inventions—Damages for Infringement.

Where a master reports that the profits of defendant derived from the infringement of plaintiffs patent cannot be computed from the evidence, nominal damages only can be assessed, though it is apparent that there were profits.

In Equity. Application for assessment of damages for infringement of patent.

*Edmu/nd Wetmore,*for plaintiff.

*Livingston Gifford,*for defendant.

Wheeler, J.

This cause has now been heard upon the supplemental report of the master as to profits of the defendant from infringement of the plaintiffs patent. The substance of the report, as it now stands, is that from all the evidence before the master the amount of such profits “cannot be computed or determined.” Therefore, while that there were some profits is apparent from the report, no definite extent of them attributable to the infringement for which the defendant is chargeable appears. There is no foundation for a decree for the payment of anything beyond merely nominal damages. *Fischer*v. *Hayes, 22*Fed. Rep. 529; *Garretson*v. *Clark,*111 U. S. 120, 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 291; *Black*v. *Thorne,*111 U. S. 122, 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 326; *Dobson*v. *Carpet Co.,*114 U. S. 439, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 945. No exceptions are filed to the report, and the only question is as to what is a proper decree upon the facts stated. *614Report accepted and confirmed, and decree thereupon prdered for the payment by defendant to the orator of six cents profits as damages, with costs.