alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Seaena, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
        for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Doug Lee, Principal Financial
        Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 
 /s/ Doug Lee
 Doug
        Lee
 Principal
        Financial Officer April 1, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

RODNEY ALLEN COLLINS, : 

 : 

 Plaintiff, : 

 : 

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0819-M 

 : 

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, : 

Commission of Social Security, : 

 : 

 Defendant. : 

 JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT be entered 

in favor of Plaintiff Rodney Allen Collins and against Defendant 

Michael J. Astrue. 

DONE this 22nd day of June, 2010. 

s/BERT W. MILLING, JR. 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00819-M Document 22 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2054 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Treasury, Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset 

Relief Program, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Treasury, Office of the Special Inspector 

General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, Salaries 

and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2054 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, OFFICE OF THE 

3 SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR THE 

4 TROUBLED ASSET RELIEF PROGRAM, SALA5 RIES AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Department of Treasury, Office of the Special In9 spector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, 

10 Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

11 $16,000,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-41542 and No. 333-72036) pertaining to the 1999
Equity Participation Plan of Golden Telecom, Inc. and in the Post Effective
Amendment No. 1 (Form S-3 No. 333-39260) to Registration Statement on Form S-1
of Golden Telecom, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of Golden Telecom, Inc. of
our report dated March 6, 2003, with respect to the financial statements of EDN
Sovintel LLC, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Golden Telecom, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2003.


/s/ Ernst & Young (CIS) Limited

Moscow, Russia
March 10, 2004
12169.

#### Covington, adm'r, *et al. v.*Case Threshing Machine Company.

Hill, J.

1. To entitle a party to a continuance under § 5717 of the Code of 1910, which provides: “If either party shall be providentially prevented from attending at the trial of any cause, and the counsel of such absent party will state in his place that he cannot go safely to trial without the presence of such absent party, such cause shall be continued, provided his continuances are not exhausted,” evidence of some character, under oath, must be presented that the absent party was in fact “providentially prevented from attending at the trial.” A statement by counsel of the absent party in this case, that “ he had received a letter from his client advising him that he was ill and could not attend court,” was not a sufficient showing in support of that ground of the motion; and there was no error in overruling the motion for a continuance. *Cavender*v. *Atkins, 2 Ga. App.*173 (58 S. E. 332) ; *O’Barr*v. *Alexander,*37 *Ga.*195.

2. On the trial of an issue made by an affidavit of illegality arising on the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage, where the plaintiff in execution claimed damage.s on the ground that the affidavit of illegality, was made for delay only, the court in effect instructed the jury that if they found that the plaintiff was entitled to damages, the amount should be 25 *782per cent, of tlie principal sum claimed. *Held,*that the instruction was not error against the defendant, since section 3301 of the Civil Code (1910) fixes the measure of damages on affidavits of illegality arising on foreclosures of chattel mortgages, when it appears that the affidavit was made for delay only, “ at *not less*than *twenty-five*per cent, damages to the plaintiff on the principal sum.”

Decided May 2, 1921.

Foreclosure of mortgage; from city court of Bainbridge — Judge'Spooner. January 10, 1921.

*W. V. Ouster,*for plaintiffs in error. *John B. Wilson,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1920 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1920

  To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Library of 
Congress, Congressional Office For International Leadership for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Library of 
Congress, Congressional Office For International Leadership for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, 
              CONGRESSIONAL OFFICE FOR INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR 
              FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Library of Congress, 
Congressional Office For International Leadership for fiscal year 2024 
may not exceed $0.00.
                                 <all>
```
CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of Argenta Systems Inc. (formerly XIT
Solutions.com, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December
31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Douglas  Levell,  Chief  Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section.
906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     1.   I  have  reviewed  the  Report;

     2.   based  on  my  knowledge,  the  Report  does  not  contain  any untrue
          statement  of  a  material  fact  or  omit  to  state  a material fact
          necessary  to  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under  which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
          the  period  covered  by  the  Report;  and

     3.   based  on  my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
          information  included  in  the  Report, fairly present in all material
          respects  the  financial  condition,  results  of operations, and cash
          flows  of  the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the
          Report.

/s/ Douglas Levell
------------------
Douglas S. Levell, President and CEO and Financial Officer

Date: March 29, 2004


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1

BULOVA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I John D. Stanton, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John D. StantonJohn D. StantonPrincipal Executive Officer
May 21, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         461,690
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,058
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               545,352
<PP&E>                                       5,753,966
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,903,023
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,396,295
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,130
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,308,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,396,295
<SALES>                                        845,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               854,708
<CGS>                                          568,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  568,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               152,261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                134,081
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            134,081
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   134,081
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    22.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    22.34
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1




Certification
Pursuant To


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant To


Section
906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002








In
connection with the Amended Annual Report of China Yida Holding,
Co.(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year
ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Chen
Minhua, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results
of operations of the Company.








/s/Chen
Minhua


Chen
Minhua


Chief
Executive Officer














Dated:
August 29, 2008
```

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.48

SUMMARY OF ORAL AMENDMENTS TO LETTER AGREEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, DATED JANUARY 31,
2000, WITH RONI JACOBSON

Effective August 15, 2003, Ms. Jacobson accepted the position of General Counsel
of the Company. In January 2001, April 2001, March 2002, July 2003, June 2004
and March 2005, Register.com, Inc. increased Ms. Jacobson's base salary by
$25,000, $5,000, $20,000, $25,000, $25,000 and $1,500, respectively, bringing
her total base salary under Section 2 of her Letter Agreement of Employment,
dated as of January 31, 2000 to $201,500. Ms. Jacobson received a cash bonus of
$103,126 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

KEVIN ROREECE RAY

,

Appellant

v

.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 3

- 00 341

- C R

Appeal from the

Criminal D istrict Court No. 2

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC# 1280503 D )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Kevin Roreece Ray , has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. Rule 42.2(a)

permits an appellate court to dismiss a c riminal appeal on the appellant’ s motion at any time

before the court ’ s decision. T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.2(a). Because the Appellant has complied with the

requirements of Rule 42.2(a), we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

February 19, 2014

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Do Not Pu blish)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7719
BENJAMIN MAURICE JONES, Petitioner - Appellant, v. R. DAVID MITCHELL, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:05-cv-00248-GCM) Submitted: April 30, 2008 Decided: June 24, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin Maurice Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Benjamin Maurice Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1820 

To require the Secretary of the Army to renew the lease of land for operations 

of the Corona Municipal Airport, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2023 

Mr. CALVERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Army to renew the lease 

of land for operations of the Corona Municipal Airport, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds the following: 

5 (1) In 1960, Corona established the Corona 

6 Municipal Airport to provide recreational opportuni7 ties for aviators throughout southern California. 

8 (2) The City of Corona initially entered into a 

9 lease agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engi10 neers on December 24, 1959. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1820 IH

1 (3) The City’s lease with the Corps of Engi2 neers enabled the construction of the airport into its 

3 current configuration. 

4 (4) For over 60 years, the Corona Municipal 

5 Airport has supported local businesses, tourism, and 

6 recreation for local residents and the region. 

7 (5) The Corona Municipal Airport maintains 

8 the capability to assist in public safety efforts to 

9 protect life and property where aviation assets may 

10 be necessary. 

11 (6) The Corona Municipal Airport supports ap12 proximately one dozen local, small businesses. 

13 (7) The Corona Municipal Airport continues to 

14 drive business development and local tourism for the 

15 City of Corona and connect people throughout 

16 southern California to those opportunities. 

17 (8) The City of Corona’s lease with the Corps 

18 of Engineers is set to expire on January 30, 2037, 

19 without an opportunity to grandfather the facility 

20 under existing policies. 

21 (9) The closure of the Corona Municipal Air22 port would deprive aviators of significant opportuni23 ties to enjoy this recreation pastime as fewer small, 

24 recreational airports in the region remain open and 

25 accessible. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 1820 IH

1 (10) Extending the City’s lease with the Corps 

2 of Engineers would allow this culturally and eco3 nomically significant facility to continue serving avi4 ators in the region. 

5 SEC. 2. CORONA AIRPORT LEASE RENEWAL, PRADO DAM, 

6 CA. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec8 retary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, 

9 shall not apply chapter 16 of the Corps of Engineers Oper10 ation and Maintenance Policy ER 1130–2–550 (March 

11 30, 2009) to the lease of land and water areas within the 

12 Prado Flood Control Basin Project Area between the De13 partment of the Army and the City of Corona, California, 

14 for the operation of the Corona Municipal Airport (Recre15 ation Lease No. DACW09–1–67–60) and shall renew such 

16 lease. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

vs. CRIMINAL NO. 15-00245-CG

CHRISTOPHER SHANNON 

PARKS,

Defendant. 

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Government’s Notice of Appeal 

from the Magistrate Judge’s Order setting amended conditions of release

(Doc. 47). The Court has reviewed, de novo, the Order, the Government’s 

Notice of Appeal (Doc. 48) and the Defendant’s Response in Opposition (Doc. 

49). In addition, the Court has listened to the recording of the proceeding

regarding the bond hearing. The Court finds that the Magistrate Judge’s 

Order amending the conditions of release is due to be and is hereby 

AFFIRMED. 

The defendant is put on notice, however, that should he violate any 

further conditions of release, including only technical violations, his bond will 

be revoked without a hearing, pending sentencing.

DONE and ORDERED this 26th day of February, 2016.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cr-00245-CG-N Document 50 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 1
DISMISS; Opinion issued April 18, 2013

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-12-00870-CV

BRAD HAWKINS, Appellant

V.

TODD SEALE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-05046-2010

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright

By letter dated June 26, 2012, the Court informed appellant that the $175 filing fee was 

past due. We instructed appellant to pay the filing fee within ten days and cautioned appellant 

that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. On July 17, 

2012, the Court granted appellant a ten-day extension of time to pay the filing fee. As of today’s 

date, appellant has not paid the filing fee. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3(c).

120870F.P05

/Carolyn Wright/

CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
1200870.R.docx –2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

BRAD HAWKINS, Appellant

No. 05-12-00870-CV V.

TODD SEALE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-05046-2010.

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee, TODD SEALE, recover his costs of this appeal from 

appellant, BRAD HAWKINS.

Judgment entered April 18, 2013.

/Carolyn Wright/

CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE