alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                      COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

Period from October 1, 1997 (inception) to December 31, 1997 and the years ended
                           December 31, 1998 and 1999
                (In thousands, except share and per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                   Year ended December 31,
                                                            October 1, 1997
                                                            (inception) to
                                                           December 31, 1997       1998            1999
                                                           -----------------   -------------   ------------
<S>                                                        <C>                 <C>             <C>
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE (1):
  Net loss                                                   $       (353)     $     (3,440)   $    (30,201)
                                                             ============      ============    ============

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (2)       13,081,500        13,081,500      14,756,339
                                                             ============      ============    ============

Basic and diluted net loss per share                         $      (0.03)     $      (0.26)   $      (2.05)
                                                             ============      ============    ============
</TABLE>

(1) Diluted net loss per share is equal to basic net loss per share since
potential common shares from the exercise of stock options and warrants are
antidilutive.


(2) The number of shares used to compute the loss per share amounts includes
13,081,500 shares of Class B common stock issued in connection with the
Company's initial capitalization in June 1999, as if all shares were outstanding
for the entire periods presented.
H. R. 1505 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

An Act 

To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States courts of certain rights 

relating to certain marks, trade names, or commercial names. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Stolen Trademarks Honored 

in America Act of 2023’’. 

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF PROHIBITION. 

Section 211 of the Department of Commerce and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained in section 101(b) of 

division A of Public Law 105–277; 112 Stat. 2681–88) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)(2)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘or entity of the executive branch’’ 

after ‘‘U.S. court’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘by a designated national’’; and 

(C) by inserting before the period ‘‘that was used in 

connection with a business or assets that were confiscated 

unless the original owner of the mark, trade name, or 

commercial name, or the bonafide successor-in-interest has 

expressly consented’’; 

(2) in subsection (b)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘or entity of the executive branch’’ 

after ‘‘U.S. court’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘by a designated national or its successor-in-interest’’; 

(3) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); 

(4) by inserting after subsection (c) the following: 

‘‘(d) Subsections (a)(2) and (b) of this section shall apply only 

if the person or entity asserting the rights knew or had reason 

to know at the time when the person or entity acquired the rights 

asserted that the mark, trade name, or commercial name was 

the same as or substantially similar to a mark, trade name, or 

commercial name that was used in connection with a business 

or assets that were confiscated.’’; and 
H. R. 1505—2 

(5) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by striking ‘‘In 

this section:’’ and all that follows through ‘‘(2) The term’’ and 

inserting ‘‘In this section, the term’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1855 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1855

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Office 
                 of the Chaplain for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Office 
                 of the Chaplain for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR SENATE, OFFICE OF 
              THE CHAPLAIN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Senate, Office of the 
Chaplain for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $474,886.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAVID GLENN MORRIS, )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Appellant,

vs. CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-604-CG-B

DANIEL B. O’BRIEN, et al., Bankr. Case. No. 14-01944-MAM-13

Appellees.

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the limited remand from the Eleventh 

Circuit Court of Appeals. The Eleventh Circuit has retained jurisdiction over this 

case, but remanded the case for the limited purpose of allowing this Court to amend 

the case caption in this matter.

The District Court docket in this case lists John C. McAleer III and Charles 

Baer as the appellees in this bankruptcy appeal. Daniel B. O’Brien has succeeded 

John C. McAleer III as the Chapter 13 trustee in debtor’s case. Additionally, 

Charles Baer, who was the Assistant United States Attorney who represented the 

United States in the Bankruptcy Court and in District Court, was erroneously 

listed. The appellees that should be named in this matter are Chapter 13 Trustee 

Daniel B. O’Brien and The United States.

Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to amend the case caption in this 

matter to reflect that the Appellees are Chapter 13 Trustee Daniel B. O’Brien and 

The United States. John C. McAleer III and Charles Baer should be removed from 

Case 1:14-cv-00604-CG-B Document 36 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 2
2

the case caption, after which the case should be referred back to the Court of 

Appeals.

DONE and ORDERED this 14th day of April, 2016.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00604-CG-B Document 36 Filed 04/14/16 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2088 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2088

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The Judiciary, 
 Federal Judiciary Center, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The Judiciary, 
 Federal Judiciary Center, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE JUDICIARY, 
              FEDERAL JUDICIARY CENTER, SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR 
              FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for The Judiciary, Federal 
Judiciary Center, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may not 
exceed $29,819,000.
                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

QUANTELL WILLIAMS

, Appellant,

v.

ZEDRICK BARBER, II

, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 3121

[ August 1, 2024 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Jeffrey R. Levenson , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE21

-

015180

.

Quantell Williams, Homestead, p ro se

.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER

, C IKLIN and L EVINE

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This Amendment to the Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”), effective as of August 1, 2010, and amended on
October 1, 2010 and May 26, 2011, by and between Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Vaughan Clift, M.D. (the “Executive”) is made as of July 31, 2015 (“Amendment
Date”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive (together the “Parties”) entered into the Employment Agreement; 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to extend the term of the Employment Agreement through July 31, 2016; and 

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to modify the Employment Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 

1. The first sentence of Section 1 of the Employment Agreement shall be replaced in its entirety with the following sentence: 

“The Company hereby agrees to employ Employee and Employee hereby accepts such employment with the Company for the period of 72 months
beginning on the Effective Date.” 
 2. All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

3. In connection with the Amendment, the Company hereby agrees to grant to the Executive an option to purchase 170,000 shares of the
Company’s Common Stock with an exercise price equal to the Fair Market Value of the Company’s Common Stock as determined in accordance with the Company’s 2010 Amended and Restated Stock and Incentive Plan, shall have a term of
10-years, shall contain the Company’s standard provisions, and shall vest on the date that the Company meets all endpoints in connection with the Ampion clinical trial as determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee. 

[Signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have executed this Amendment as of the Amendment
Date written above. 
  

			
	AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael Macaluso

	Its:	 	CEO
	
	VAUGHAN CLIFT, M.D.
	
	 /s/ Vaughan Clift

	Vaughan Clift, M.D.
1

 A Verified Claim of Ownership has been filed by Accumarine Transportation, L.P.

(doc. 12). 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

REGIONS EQUIPMENT FINANCE *

CORPORATION *

* CIVIL ACTION NO. CV-10-258

VERSUS *

* IN REM

M/V ACCU I (Official Number 533962); *

AT 1800B (Official Number 530112); and *

their respective engines, tackle, furniture, *

apparel, appurtenances, etc., in rem *

ORDER OF PUBLICATION OF ACTION AGAINST

AND ARREST OF THE M/V ACCU I AND AT 1800B

The United States Marshal having arrested (i) the tug boat M/V ACCU I on Wednesday,

May 19, 2010, and (ii) the barge AT 1800B on Friday, May 21, 2010, and more than fourteen

(14) days having elapsed since the execution of process against said vessels without said vessels

having been released from Warrant of Arrest;1

It is now, on the motion and amended of Regions Equipment Finance Corporation (Docs.

11, 13), ORDERED that public notice of the action and arrest be given by the United States

Marshal three (3) times a week for two (2) consecutive weeks in the Press-Register, a newspaper

published in the territorial jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern

District of Alabama, Southern Division, to notify all persons who may have or claim any interest

in or right against either or both (i) the M/V ACCU I or (ii) the AT 1800B, that they must both

file a verified statement pursuant to Rule (C)(6) of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty

Case 1:10-cv-00258-KD-M Document 19 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 2
2

and Maritime Claims identifying the interest or right in the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Alabama, Southern Division, Mobile, Alabama within fourteen (14) days of

the final publication date and file an answer within twenty-one (21) days of the filing of their

verified statement. 

Done this the 16th day of June, 2010. 

s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DATES OF PUBLICATION: June 28, 29 and 30th and

July 5, 6, and 7th

Case 1:10-cv-00258-KD-M Document 19 Filed 06/21/10 Page 2 of 2
#### Jordan Kapchan, Appellant, v 31 Mt. Hope, LLC, et al., Respondents.

[975 NYS2d 44]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J.), entered on or about July 24, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendants hired plaintiff, an attorney, to represent them in conjunction with their purchase of an apartment building. Plaintiff states that because defendants did not have the total amount due at the closing, he loaned defendants $68,091.55. However, plaintiffs evidence, including a handwritten closing statement that he prepared, purporting to show the itemized closing costs, and a series of checks, signed only by defendant Vincent Rosso, to be cashed by plaintiff in the future, is insufficient to substantiate his allegation that he made a loan to all defendants in the amount of $68,091.55. Plaintiffs argument that, since the loan repayment checks were drawn from the bank accounts of all of the individual defendants, they were parties to the loan transaction, is unpersuasive, since there is no evidence that any defendant other than Vincent Rosso agreed to be bound by the loan agreement.

The record also presents disputed issues of fact as to whether the alleged balance of the loan was indeed $50,000; whether plaintiff improperly inflated the amount of the closing costs; and whether the agreed upon legal fee was $25,000, as plaintiff contends, or $10,000, as defendants maintain. While the parties advance conflicting positions on these points, issue finding, rather than issue determining, is the function of a court on the disposition of a summary judgment motion *(see generally Vega v Restani Constr. Corp.,*18 NY3d 499, 505 [2012]).

Furthermore, defendants’ unpleaded affirmative defense that they were coerced at the closing into taking a loan from plaintiff raises triable issues *(see e.g. Bishop v Maurer,*106 AD3d 622 [1st Dept 2013]). The court, “in examining the pleadings on a *531motion for summary judgment, may take into account an unpleaded defense” *(Feliciano-Delgado v New York Hotel Trades Council & Hotel Assn, of N.Y. City Health Ctr.,*281 AD2d 312, 316 [1st Dept 2001]).

We have considered the remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Richter, ManzanetDaniels and Feinman, JJ.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTIONS AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS UNDER THE GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC. OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLANS 

Effective as of June 1, 2015, the Management Development and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Genworth Financial, Inc. (the
“Company”) approved an amendment to all outstanding stock options and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) granted under the 2004 Genworth Financial, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan and the 2012 Genworth Financial, Inc.
Omnibus Incentive Plan to provide for the automatic exercise of vested and “in-the-money” stock options and SARs on the last trading day prior to their expiration, as set forth in the following paragraph. 

If the closing price of the Company’s Class A common stock (the “Common Stock”) exceeds the exercise price of a stock option or SAR
by at least $0.01 on the last trading day prior to the expiration of the award for any reason, the vested, outstanding and unexercised portion of the award (not including any award that has been forfeited by its terms), if any, shall be
automatically exercised without further action or notice by the Company or the grantee (an “Automatic Exercise”), and the Company shall issue or transfer to the grantee the number of shares of Common Stock to which he or she is
entitled based on such Automatic Exercise, net of shares to be withheld by the Company having a fair market value equal to the minimum amount required to be withheld for tax purposes.
Exhibit
32.1




Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of NeuMedia, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby
certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 of
the Company (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date: November
22, 2010




/s/
      Ray SchaafRay
      SchaafPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Accountants**

Materialise NV 

Leuven, Belgium 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-197236 and No. 333-212445) and Form F-3 (No. 333-213649) of Materialise NV of ourreport dated June 26, 2018, relating to the financial statements of RSPRINT Powered by Materialise NV which appears in this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Materialise NV. Ourreport contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. 

BDO Bedrijfsrevisoren Burg. CVBA 

On behalf of it, 

Bert Kegels 

/s/ Bert Kegels 

Zaventem, Belgium 

June 26, 2018
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1860 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Office of 

the Legislative Counsel of the Senate for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Office of the Legislative Counsel of the Senate for 

fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 SENATE, OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUN5 SEL OF THE SENATE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:40 Apr 13, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1860.IH H1860

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1860 IH

1 able for Senate, Office of the Legislative Counsel of the 

2 Senate for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $6,278,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 10.10    December 26, 2008  Ilan
Daskal 1498
Saskatchewan Drive Sunnyvale,
California 94087  Dear
Ilan:  Reference
is made to the (change-in-control) Severance Agreement by and between you and
International Rectifier Corporation, dated as of September 19, 2008 (the Severance
Agreement).  The
purpose of this letter is to supplement the terms of the Severance Agreement to
include terms and conditions designed to make any payments pursuant to the
Severance Agreement compliant with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (including the Treasury Regulations and other
published guidance related thereto) (Section 409A).  Your
Severance Agreement is hereby modified as follows; capitalized terms used but
not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Severance
Agreement:  1.Severance.  Subject to the conditions of
payment described in Section 10 relating to specified employees, any Cash
Severance payable pursuant to Section 2(b) of the Severance Agreement
shall be paid in a cash lump sum on the 60th day following your separation from service,
provided you have promptly executed and delivered (and not revoked) a Release
Agreement within 50 days of your termination; provided, however,
that if you fail to execute and deliver such release, or you revoke such
release, you shall not be paid any Cash Severance pursuant to the Severance
Agreement.  For this purpose, a separation
from service shall be defined within the meaning of Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(h)(1),
without regard to the optional alternative definitions available thereunder.  Except
as modified hereby, your Severance Agreement remains unmodified.  Please indicate your agreement with the
foregoing by signing where indicated below.  Regards,INTERNATIONAL
  RECTIFIER CORPORATIONBy:Its:
   Assistant SecretaryAcknowledged
  and agreed:Ilan
  DaskalDate:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David K. Spohr, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of World Monitor Trust II  Series F for the period October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ David K. Spohr                      
|David K. Spohr                          
|Senior Vice President and               
|Director of Fund Administration         
|(Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)

Date: March 20, 2008