Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 2014 / Notices 75845 

the proposed action, alternatives with 

equal or greater environmental impact 

were not evaluated. As an alternative to 

the proposed action, the NRC staff 

considered denial of the requested 

exemption, which would require 

unloading and reloading the affected 

MPC as described above. Denying the 

exemption would result in an increase 

in radiological exposure to workers, a 

small increase in the potential for 

radioactive releases to the environment 

due to radioactive material handling 

accidents, and increased cost to the 

licensee. Therefore, the NRC staff has 

determined that approving the proposed 

action has a lesser environmental 

impact than the alternative. 

Agencies and Persons Consulted: The 

environmental assessment associated 

with this exemption request was sent to 

Mr. Bernard Bevill Chief of the 

Radiation Control Section in the 

Arkansas Department of Health, by 

letter dated November 10, 2014. A 

response, which was received by 

electronic mail dated November 21, 

2014 (ADAMS Accession No. 

ML14328A287), states that the Arkansas 

Department of Health has no concerns. 

The NRC staff has determined that a 

consultation under Section 7 of the 

Endangered Species Act is not required 

because the proposed action will not 

affect listed species or a critical habitat. 

The NRC staff has also determined that 

the proposed action is not a type of 

activity having the potential to cause 

effects on historic properties. Therefore, 

no consultation is required under 

Section 106 of the National Historic 

Preservation Act. 

III. Finding of No Significant Impact 

The environmental impacts of the 

proposed action have been reviewed in 

accordance with the requirements set 

forth in 10 CFR part 51. Based upon the 

foregoing Environmental Assessment, 

the Commission finds that the proposed 

action of granting an exemption from 

the requirements of 10 CFR 72.212(a)(2), 

10 CFR 72.212(b)(3), 10 CFR 

72.212(b)(5)(i), and the portion of 10 

CFR 72.212(b)(11) that states the 

licensee shall comply with the terms, 

conditions, and specifications of the 

CoC, and from 10 CFR 72.214 in order 

to allow Entergy to store spent fuel 

assemblies in MPC–24–060 in the asloaded configuration at the ISFSI 

associated with ANO, Units 1 and 2, 

will not significantly impact the quality 

of the human environment. 

Accordingly, the Commission has 

determined that an environmental 

impact statement for the proposed 

exemption is not warranted and that a 

finding of no significant impact is 

appropriate. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day 

of December, 2014. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Chris Allen, 

Project Manager, Spent Fuel Licensing 

Branch, Division of Spent Fuel Management, 

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and 

Safeguards. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29750 Filed 12–18–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[NRC–2014–0267] 

Draft Emergency Preparedness 

Frequently Asked Questions 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of availability; request 

for comment. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) is seeking public 

comment on emergency preparedness 

(EP) frequently asked question (EPFAQ) 

No. 2014–002, EPFAQ No. 2014–003, 

and EPFAQ No. 2014–007. These 

EPFAQs will be used to provide 

clarification of guidance documents 

related to the development and 

maintenance of EP program elements. 

The NRC is publishing these 

preliminary results to inform the public 

and solicit comments. 

DATES: Submit comments by January 20, 

2015. Comments received after this date 

will be considered if it is practical to do 

so, but the NRC is able to ensure 

consideration only for comments 

received before this date. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any of the following methods (unless 

this document describes a different 

method for submitting comments on a 

specific subject): 

• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2014–0267. Address 

questions about NRC dockets to Carol 

Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422; 

email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For 

technical questions, contact the 

individual listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

document. 

• Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, 

Chief, Rules, Announcements, and 

Directives Branch, Office of 

Administration, Mail Stop: 3WFN–06– 

A44M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 

0001. 

For additional direction on accessing 

information and submitting comments, 

see ‘‘Obtaining Information and 

Submitting Comments’’ in the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this document. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Edward Robinson, Office of Nuclear 

Security and Incident Response, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555–0001, telephone: 

301–287–3774, or email at: 

edward.robinson@nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Obtaining Information and 

Submitting Comments 

A. Obtaining Information 

Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2014– 

0267 when contacting the NRC about 

the availability of information regarding 

this document. You may obtain 

publicly-available information related to 

this document by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2014–0267. 

• NRC’s Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System 

(ADAMS): You may access publicly 

available documents online in the 

ADAMS Public Documents collection at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ 

adams.html. To begin the search, select 

‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then 

select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS 

Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, 

please contact the NRC’s Public 

Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 

1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by 

email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The draft 

EPFAQs are available electronically in 

ADAMS under Accession No. 

ML14261A054, and are available on the 

NRC’s Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/ 

about-nrc/emerg-preparedness/faq/faqcontactus.html. 

• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and 

purchase copies of public documents at 

the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. 

B. Submitting Comments 

Please include Docket ID NRC–2014– 

0267 in the subject line of your 

comment submission, in order to ensure 

that the NRC is able to make your 

comment submission available to the 

public in this docket. 

The NRC cautions you not to include 

identifying or contact information in 

comment submissions that you do not 

want to be publicly disclosed. The NRC 

posts all comment submissions at http:// 

www.regulations.gov as well as entering 

the comment submissions into ADAMS, 

and the NRC does not edit comment 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

75846 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 2014 / Notices 

1Request of the United States Postal Service to 

Add Priority Mail Contract 104 to Competitive 

Product List and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of 

Unredacted Governors’ Decision, Contract, and 

Supporting Data, December 11, 2014 (Request). 

submissions to remove identifying or 

contact information. 

If you are requesting or aggregating 

comments from other persons for 

submission to the NRC, then you should 

inform those persons not to include 

identifying or contact information in 

their comment submissions that they 

do not want to be publicly disclosed. 

Your request should state that the NRC 

will not edit comment submissions to 

remove such information before making 

the comment submissions available to 

the public or entering the comment 

submissions into ADAMS. 

II. Background 

The NRC is requesting comment on 

these draft EPFAQs. This process is 

intended to describe the manner in 

which the NRC may provide interested 

outside parties an opportunity to share 

their individual views with NRC staff 

regarding the appropriate response to 

questions raised on the interpretation or 

applicability of EP guidance issued or 

endorsed by the NRC, before the NRC 

issues an official response to such 

questions. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland on December 

9, 2014. 

For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

James Andersen, 

Deputy Director, Division of Preparedness and 

Response, Office of Nuclear Security and 

Incident Response. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29749 Filed 12–18–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. MC2015–19 and CP2015–23; 

Order No. 2289] 

New Postal Product 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recent Postal Service filing concerning 

the addition of Priority Mail Contract 

104 negotiated service agreement to the 

competitive product list. This notice 

informs the public of the filing, invites 

public comment, and takes other 

administrative steps. 

DATES: Comments are due: December 

22, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http://

www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit 

comments electronically should contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section by 

telephone for advice on filing 

alternatives. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 

202–789–6820. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Notice of Commission Action 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

In accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3642 

and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq., the Postal 

Service filed a formal request and 

associated supporting information to 

add Priority Mail Contract 104 to the 

competitive product list.1

The Postal Service 

contemporaneously filed a redacted 

contract related to the proposed new 

product under 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 

39 CFR 3015.5. Id. Attachment B. 

To support its Request, the Postal 

Service filed a copy of the contract, a 

copy of the Governors’ Decision 

authorizing the product, proposed 

changes to the Mail Classification 

Schedule, a Statement of Supporting 

Justification, a certification of 

compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a), and 

an application for non-public treatment 

of certain materials. It also filed 

supporting financial workpapers. 

II. Notice of Commission Action 

The Commission establishes Docket 

Nos. MC2015–19 and CP2015–23 to 

consider the Request pertaining to the 

proposed Priority Mail Contract 104 

product and the related contract, 

respectively. 

The Commission invites comments on 

whether the Postal Service’s filings in 

the captioned dockets are consistent 

with the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 

3633, or 3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and 39 

CFR part 3020, subpart B. Comments are 

due no later than December 22, 2014. 

The public portions of these filings can 

be accessed via the Commission’s Web 

site (http://www.prc.gov). 

The Commission appoints Kenneth R. 

Moeller to serve as Public 

Representative in these dockets. 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

It is ordered: 

1. The Commission establishes Docket 

Nos. MC2015–19 and CP2015–23 to 

consider the matters raised in each 

docket. 

2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Kenneth 

R. Moeller is appointed to serve as an 

officer of the Commission to represent 

the interests of the general public in 

these proceedings (Public 

Representative). 

3. Comments are due no later than 

December 22, 2014. 

4. The Secretary shall arrange for 

publication of this order in the Federal 

Register. 

By the Commission. 

Shoshana M. Grove, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29695 Filed 12–18–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. IC–31373; File No. 812–14097] 

Garrison Capital, Inc., et al.; Notice of 

Application 

December 15, 2014. 

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’). 

ACTION: Notice of application for an 

order under sections 57(a)(4) and 57(i) 

of the Investment Company Act of 1940 

(the ‘‘Act’’) and rule 17d–1 under the 

Act to permit certain joint transactions 

otherwise prohibited by section 57(a)(4) 

of the Act and rule 17d–1 under the Act. 

SUMMARY: Summary of Application: 

Applicants request an order to permit 

Garrison Capital Inc. to co-invest in 

portfolio companies with certain 

affiliated investment funds. 

APPLICANTS: Garrison Capital Inc. (the 

‘‘Company’’), Garrison Funding 2013–2 

Ltd. (‘‘GF 2013–2’’), Garrison Capital 

SBIC LP (‘‘Garrison SBIC’’), Garrison 

Capital SBIC Holdco Inc., Garrison 

Capital SBIC General Partner LLC, 

Garrison Middle Market Funding LP, 

Garrison Middle Market Funding A LP, 

Garrison Opportunity Fund III B L.P., 

Garrison Opportunity Fund IV A LLC 

and Garrison Opportunity Fund IV B 

L.P. (collectively with Garrison Middle 

Market Funding LP, Garrison Middle 

Market Fund A LP, Garrison 

Opportunity Fund III B L.P. and 

Garrison Opportunity Fund IV A LLC, 

the ‘‘Existing Funds’’), Garrison Capital 

Advisers LLC (the ‘‘Company Adviser’’), 

Garrison Investment Management LLC 

(the ‘‘Fund Adviser’’) and Garrison 

Investment Group LP (collectively, the 

‘‘Applicants’’). 

DATES: Filing Dates: The application was 

filed on November 21, 2012, and 

amended on February 25, 2013, August 

12, 2013, January 16, 2014, May 21, 

2014, August 26, 2014 and December 

11, 2014. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES