alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of BTU International, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 28, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the
Report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Thomas P. KealyThomas P. KealyVice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)


Dated: November 7, 2008
**EXHIBIT 31(2)**
     I, Ricardo Meléndez, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofDoral Financial Corporation, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Doral Financial Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this quarterly report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 a. designed such disclosure controls, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a. all significant deficiencies and material weakness in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 9, 2004    /s/ Ricardo Meléndez  Ricardo Meléndez Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32 (a)

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Enzo  Biochem,  Inc.,  and
Subsidiaries  ("the  Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January
31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Elazar  Rabbani,  Ph.D.,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


                  (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,
in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
the Company.





Dated: March 13, 2006                   By:  /s/ Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.
                                             -------------------------
                                                 Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.
                                                 Chief Executive Officer




         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Act
Commission or its staff upon request.
Filed 10/17/06 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2006 ND 207

City of Bismarck, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Martin G. Perusquia, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20060048

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Wayne D. Goter, P.O. Box 1552, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-1552, for defendant and appellant; submitted on briefs.

Paul H. Fraase, City Prosecutor, P.O. Box 5503, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5503, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on briefs.

City of Bismarck v. Perusquia

No. 20060048

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Martin Perusquia appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol.  He argues the City of Bismarck did not present sufficient evidence to convict him.  The record contains sufficient evidence to support the conviction; therefore, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).  

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   The undersigned, Eleanor L. Thomas, President (chief executive officer) of
the managing owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the 'Managing
Owner'), of World Monitor Trust II--Series F ('Series F'), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) Series F's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
       2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
       hereof (the 'Annual Report'), fully complies with the requirements of
       Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       Series F.


/s/ Eleanor L. Thomas
------------------------------------------------------
Eleanor L. Thomas
President (chief executive officer) of the Managing Owner
March 18, 2003


   The undersigned, Steven Weinreb, Chief Financial Officer of the managing
owner, the Managing Owner, of Series F, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

   (1) Series F's Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       Series F.


/s/ Steven Weinreb
------------------------------------------------------
Steven Weinreb
Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner
March 18, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHARLES K. BRELAND, JR., et

al.,

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiffs,

vs. CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0158-CG-C

LEVADA EF FIVE, LLC

Defendant.

ORDER

This cause is before the court on the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for 

Defendant Levada EF Five, LLC filed by W. Alexander Gray, Jr. (Doc. 47), and the 

Certificate of Service (Doc. 49).

Upon due consideration of the grounds cited and as counsel represents in the 

Certificate of Service that a copy of the motion was served on Levada EF Five, LLC 

via U. S. Mail, the motion is hereby GRANTED. 

The rule is well established that a corporation is an artificial entity that can 

act only through agents, cannot appear pro se, and must be represented by counsel. 

Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp., 764 F.2d 1381, 1385 (11th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 

U.S. 10528 (1986)(citing Commercial and Railroad Bank of Vicksburg v. Slocomb, 

39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 60, 10 L.Ed. 354 (1840); In re K.M.A., Inc., 652 F.2d 398 (5th Cir. 

Unit B 1981); Southwest Exp. Co. v. I.C.C., 670 F.2d 53 (5th Cir.1982)). Levada EF 

Five, LLC does not have the option of proceeding without counsel. The rule 

Case 1:14-cv-00158-CG-C Document 53 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 2
2

requiring representation by counsel for a corporation is nearly as old as this 

country’s judiciary:

It has been the law for the better part of two centuries, for example, 

that a corporation may appear in the federal courts only through 

licensed counsel. Osborn v. President of Bank of United States, 22 

U.S. (9 Wheat.) 738, 829, 6 L.Ed. 204 (1824); see Turner v. American 

Bar Assn., 407 F.Supp. 451, 476 (N.D. Tex. 1975)(citing the “long line 

of cases” from 1824 to the present holding that a corporation may only 

be represented by licensed counsel), affirmance order sub nom. Taylor 

v. Montgomery, 539 F.2d 715 (Table)(7th Cir. 1976), and aff’d sub nom.

Pilla v. American Bar Ass’n., 542 F.2d 56 (8th Cir. 1976). As the courts 

have recognized, the rationale for that rule applies equally to all 

artificial entities.

Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, Unit II Men’s Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 

201-02 (1993). Accord, Federal Trade Commission v. GEM Merchandising Corp., 

1995 WL 623168 at *1 (11th Cir. Sept. 1, 1995) (“It is well settled that a corporation 

is an artificial entity which cannot appear pro se in legal proceedings but must be 

represented by counsel. citing Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp., 764 F.2d 1381, 1385 (11th 

Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1058 (1986)). This rule applies even when the 

person seeking to represent the corporation is its president and major stockholder.”) 

Levada EF Five, LLC, is therefore ORDERED TO OBTAIN COUNSEL

to represent it in this action; new counsel for Levada EF Five, LLC shall file a 

notice of appearance on or before January 30, 2015. 

DONE and ORDERED this 16th day of January, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00158-CG-C Document 53 Filed 01/16/15 Page 2 of 2
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1906 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Joint Items, House 

Historic Buildings Revitalization Trust for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Joint 

Items, House Historic Buildings Revitalization Trust for 

fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 JOINT ITEMS, HOUSE HISTORIC BUILDINGS 

5 REVITALIZATION TRUST FOR FISCAL YEAR 

6 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Joint Items, House Historic Buildings RevitalizaVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:51 Apr 14, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1906.IH H1906

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1906 IH

1 tion Trust for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $10,000,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
11897.

#### Nightingale *v.*Mayor and Council of Brunswick.

Broyles, C. J.

1. Where one convicted in a police court of violating a city ordinance presents a petition for certiorari, and the bond attached to the petition does not provide for his personal appearance to abide the final judgment, order, or sentence upon him in the case, and no affidavit in forma pauperis has been made, sanction of the petition should be denied. *Ruffin*v. *Millen,*18 *Ga. App.*784 (90 S. E. 654) ; *Gillespie*v. *Macon,*19 *Ga. App.*1 (90 S. E. 970).

(a) A bond conditioned that the defendant should “well and truly be and appear before the police court to abide and perform the said judgment in the event certiorari shall not be granted, and in the event said judgment be reversed by said superior court or any appellate court and a new trial be granted, then to appear before the said police court to stand trial again for said offense and do and perform the judgment of the court, then this bond to be void, otherwise of full force, virtue, and effect,” is not a proper bond, since it does not provide for the personal appearance of the defendant to abide the judgment, order, or sentence in the case, in the event that the certiorari should be granted and subsequently dismissed or overruled, or in the event that the judge of the superior court should render a final judgment in the case without sending it *44back to the police. court for another trial. See, in this connection, *McDonald*v. *Ludowici,*3 *Ga. App.*654 (60 S. E. 337).

Decided December 15, 1920.

Certiorari; from Glynn superior court — Judge Highsmith. October 1, 1920.

*Franlc II. Harris,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. T. Colson,*contra.

2. The judgment complained of being correct, the ground upon which^the judge of the superior court based it is immaterial. *Ruffin*v. *Mitten,*supra, and eases cited.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworlh, JJ., concur.*
! " #$%&' !
!
(! )*"*" 


#(+,-,,-+,	+$,$#	,

.


//////////"//////////

#

"0
















$"
(1

#(1


*2 0
1


!
 "0

2 0
1

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

	
	


	




#30 .


 .

.
4 
 !"" .
  
#$

%&'
 .

003"0
03"
)"
 
*
"


.."

" )"
5 
*6)

*7

0


)6.
#

"

$00""3 " #$

%88 9."

" .09: .
3*6"
0
"
.#;%4


.
"

""
.#$%&''&9.

<
..
6
33*)*
9

		..
0"1

-(+- ;	(,-.


="3
 "*603"
"


03"0
(as reflected in 

the last judgment issued)  0." ! "# 

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

		$


-<
3".
7"
3
9**3"".
> 0

 ".**
0



		



1

Judge’s signature

-


1

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

 Southern District of Alabama

JASON KELLEY 08-00327-002

10557-003

09-24-2010

Arthur Madden

✔

✔

120 97 months

09-24-2010

06-16-2015

11-01-2015 United States District Judge

This sentence reduction applies to the concurrent sentences imposed on all Counts other than Counts 1 through 82.

Counts 1 through 82 have a statutory maximum sentence of 60 months.

Callie V.S. Granade 

U.S. District Judge

Digitally signed by Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge 

DN: cn=Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge, o=U.S. 

Government, ou=Federal Judiciary, 

email=efile_granade@alsd.uscourts.gov, c=US 

Date: 2015.06.16 14:15:31 -06'00'

Case 1:08-cr-00327-CG-B Document 997 Filed 06/16/15 Page 1 of 1
Assessment of Biometric 

Robustness Against Spoof 

A5acks

Ricardo N. Rodrigues and Venu Govindaraju

Center for Unified Biometrics and Sensors 

University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 
Assessment of Biometric Robustness Against Spoof A5acks

Ricardo N. Rodrigues and Venu Govindaraju

Department of Computer Science and Engineering 

University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 

• Previous work: “Robustness of Mul-modal Biometric 

Fusion Methods against Spoof A;acks”;  Journal of 

Visual Languages and CompuHng, 2009. 

– Fusion takes into consideraHon the security of each 

unimodal system. 

– How to measure the intrinsic robustness of a biometric 

system? 

– So far this assessment has been subjecHve (e.g. low, 

medium, high) 

– Or measured via performance evaluaHon (FAR,FRR) with 

spoofed samples. 
Assessment of Biometric Robustness Against Spoof A5acks

Ricardo N. Rodrigues and Venu Govindaraju

Department of Computer Science and Engineering 

University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 

• Proposed method: 

– Based on informaHon theory. 

– Takes into consideraHon the spoofing Hme (TTS) 

– Loss of discriminaHve informaHon (LDI): 

– QualitaHve assessment:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

WILLIAM SPYRO SPEROS 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

FROM INACTIVE STATUS 

PER CURIAM 

: No. 54 DB 2017 (No. 39 RST 2017) 

: Attorney Registration No. 203140 

: (Erie County) 

ORDER 

AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2017, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated June 12, 2017, is approved and it is ORDERED that 

William Spyro Speros, who has been on Inactive Status, has never been suspended or 

disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and 

learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, 

hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The 

expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall 

be paid by the Petitioner.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         304,753
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  671,468
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,000
<INVENTORY>                                    164,458
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,140,584
<PP&E>                                         912,408
<DEPRECIATION>                               (768,366)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,615,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,239,482
<BONDS>                                      1,642,687
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       498,827
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,765,284)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,615,712
<SALES>                                      4,046,506
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,046,506
<CGS>                                        2,469,163
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,469,163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,940,418
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (120,465)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,483,440)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,483,440)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,483,440)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Attached is the Financial Data Schedule for Netegrity, Inc. (Nasdaq: NETE) for
the second quarter ended June 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       4,620,286
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  576,416
<ALLOWANCES>                                    74,797
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,275,532
<PP&E>                                         582,449
<DEPRECIATION>                                  80,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,261,392
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,609,466
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        92,699
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,559,227
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,261,392
<SALES>                                      2,170,250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,170,250
<CGS>                                          812,702
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,479,067
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               101,148
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,606,948)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,606,948)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,606,948)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>The Company took a one-time write off of on its investment in Encotone, Ltd. in
the amount of $1,000,000, or $(0.11) per share.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>