alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SARA SURBER, individually and 

on behalf of all similarly situated

individuals, 

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0309-CG-M

)

MCCARTHY, BURGESS & WOLFF, 

INC.,

)

)

)

)

Defendant. )

FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order granting the Defendant’s motion for 

summary judgment, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 

JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff, Sara 

Surber. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s claims against 

Defendant are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Costs are to be taxed 

against Plaintiff.

DONE and ORDERED this 12th day of May, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00309-CG-M Document 46 Filed 05/12/15 Page 1 of 1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2042 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, 

National Council on Disability for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, National Council on Disability for fiscal 

year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 RELATED AGENCIES, NATIONAL COUNCIL ON 

5 DISABILITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:28 Apr 17, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2042.IH H2042

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2042 IH

1 able for Related Agencies, National Council on Disability 

2 for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $3,250,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LARRY C. DIXON, #138238, :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0757-WS-B

:

GWEN MOSELY, et al., :

:

Defendants. :

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be and

is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(g).

DONE this 3rd day of March, 2010.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00757-WS-B Document 10 Filed 03/03/10 Page 1 of 1
#### Virgil Hewett, et al., *v.*Louisville & Nashville R. Co.

Surety Bonds — Liability of Sureties — False Representations of Holders of Bonds.

Sureties to a corporation for tlie good conduct and fidelity of an officer tbrougb whose hands its moneys are to pass, are to he treated with entire good faith, and where such corporation, knowing that its bonded officer is failing, to account for its money, in answer to inquiries of the bondsmen represent that the *money*is being accounted for, it cannot recover on such bond for defalcations occurring after such reprentations were made.

APPEAL FROM HARDIN CIRCUIT COURT.

March 10, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The court below erred in refusing to allow appellants to file that portion of their amended answer offered August 20, 1874, that purported to amend paragraph No. 4 of their original answer.

They therein directly aver that on the 26th of June, 1872, they applied to the railroad company for information as to the state of the accounts of Morris, and that the company then fraudulently represented to, them that his accounts were correct, and that he was ahead on his payments to the company. They aver that at this time appellee knew that Morris was indebted to it, and that this fact was fraudulently concealed from them because the railroad company desired to keep him in its employment. If these averments are true, the company not only committed a fraud in misrepresenting the true state of Morris’ accounts, but was also guilty of a fraud on his sureties, by retaining him in office after it discovered that he was not paying over the monej's received by him as agent, in the manner and at the time required by the terms and condition of his employment.

Sureties are at all times to be treated with good faith, and especially is that the case where they are sureties to a corporation for the good conduct and fidelity of an officer, through whose hands its moneys are to pass. 1 Story’s Equity Jurisprudence, Sec. 215; *Graves v. Lebanon Bank,*Mss. Opinion.

When.a corporation discovers that one of its bonded officers is misappropriating, or failing to account for moneys coming, to his hands, it cannot remain passive and rely for indemnity for future peculations upon the insolvency of his sureties. Good faith and *423common honesty require that it shall at once remove him from office. If it fails to do so, it is as much guilty of a fraud upon his sureties as if, before they became his bondsmen, it had concealed from them the fact that he had therefore been guilty of like conduct, under similar circumstances. If the company was guilty of the fraud charged in this amendment, it cannot recover for any moneys that came to the hands of Morris after June 26, 1872.'

*Brown & Murray, for appellants.*

*W. H. Chelf, L. Cook, for appellee.*

For the error in refusing-to allow the amendment to be filed, the judgment must be *reversed.*We perceive no other error in the proceeding in the lower court. The cause is remanded with instruction to grant a new trial, and for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Judge Cofer did not sit in this case.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [RP14-638-000, CP14-125-000, CP14-126-000, et al.]
 Atmos Energy Corporation v. American Midstream (Midla) LLC
Docket No. RP14-638-000American Midstream (Midla) LLC
Docket Nos. CP14-125-000, CP14-126-000, RP14-689-000, RP14-689-001, RP14-1049-000, RP14-1049-001, RP14-1049-002, (not consolidated)
 On December 11, 2014, American Midstream (Midla) LLC and the other Supporting Parties [1]
                    
                     filed a Stipulation and Agreement (Settlement) in the above referenced proceedings. Pursuant to Rule 602(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice,[2]
                    
                     notice is hereby given that initial comments on the Settlement are due no later than December 31, 2014 and reply comments are due no later than January 12, 2015. Dated: December 16, 2014. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         In addition to Midla, the Supporting Parties are Atmos Energy Corporation; BASF Corporation; Enbridge Marketing (US) L.P.; Entergy Services, Inc., Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Entergy Arkansas, Inc.; EVP Properties, L.P.; Louisiana Public Service Commission; Louisiana Municipal Gas Authority; Mississippi Public Service Commission; and Tunica Pipeline, LLC. Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         18 CFR 385.602(f) (2014). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2014-29948 Filed 12-22-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.4


                          AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 6.1 OF
                          LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

         This Amendment to Article 6.1 of the Limited Partnership Agreement of
Dodge City Healthcare Group, LP, dated March 1, 1995, is entered into on June
13, 1997, between Dodge City Healthcare Group, LP by and through its general
partner (Partnership) and Dodge City Outpatient Surgical Facility, Inc. (Limited
Partner).

         WHEREAS, subject to change based on the cash needs of the Partnership,
the General Partner agrees to distribute 90% of book pretax income for 1997 to
1999 and 85% thereafter until the intercompany debt is retired. Further, the
Partnership agrees to distribute these profits on a quarterly basis by April 15,
June 15, September 15, and January 15 of each year (i.e., approximate due dates
of estimated quarterly federal and state income tax payments). By the fourth
quarter distribution on January 15, the total amount distributed for the year
should equal approximately 90% of the estimated annual distribution (i.e., 90%
of 90%, or 81% of pretax income for 1997). In March of each year, a final
distribution will be made to reconcile the quarterly distributions to the annual
distribution amount.

         WHEREAS, for 1997, the Partnership agrees to distribute the Limited
Partner's portion of these distribution payments as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                 Quarter           Distribution Date              Amount
                 -------           -----------------              ------
<S>                                <C>                        <C>
                1st & 2nd          June 1997                       $600,000
                   3rd             September 15, 1997              $250,000
                   4th             January 15, 1998                $250,000
            Final Adjustment       March 1998                  To be determined
</TABLE>

         WHEREAS, both parties agree to maintain the existing accounting
methodology for bad debts for income tax purposes and therefore forego filing an
amended 1996 Partnership income tax return in regards to the bad debts incurred
by the facility.

Dodge City Healthcare Group, LP                Dodge City Outpatient Surgical
       by and through Columbia/HCA of            Facility, Inc.
       Dodge City, its General Partner


By:                                            By:
    -----------------------------------            -----------------------------
       Kevin Gross                                     Jack R. Shearer, CRNA
       Division President                              President

                                               By:
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                       Mohammad Amawi, MD

                                               By:
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                       Kelly Cohoon, DDS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                    Certification Of Chief Financial Officer
               pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Jonathan Stern, Chief Financial Officer of Register.com, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350 adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(i) The Company's accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Jonathan Stern
-----------------------
Jonathan Stern
Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  April 4, 2003
<PAGE>

                                 HCC INDUSTRIES INC.
                  COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                    (IN THOUSANDS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           For the Six Months Ended
                                                       -------------------------------
                                                       September 26,     September 27,
                                                            1998             1997
                                                       -------------     -------------
<S>                                                       <C>              <C>
Earnings:

     Earnings before taxes and extraordinary item         $  4,646         $  2,987

     Add:  Fixed Charges*                                    5,486            5,178
                                                          --------         --------
                                                          $ 10,132         $  8,165
                                                          --------         --------
                                                          --------         --------

* Fixed Charges:

     Interest expense                                       $5,486           $5,178
                                                          --------         --------
                                                            $5,486           $5,178
                                                          --------         --------
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                             1.8              1.6
                                                          --------         --------
                                                          --------         --------
</TABLE>

* The ratios of earnings to fixed charges were computed by dividing earnings 
by fixed charges.  For this purpose, "earnings" consist of earnings before 
taxes and extraordinary item plus fixed charges and "fixed charges" consist 
of interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs.





                                      17
Exhibit 32.2

BULOVA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John D. Stanton, Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John D. StantonJohn D. StantonPrincipal Financial Officer
May 16, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2023 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2023

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
      Education, Innovation and Improvement for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
      Education, Innovation and Improvement for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF 
              EDUCATION, INNOVATION AND IMPROVEMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 
              2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Education, 
Innovation and Improvement for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $0.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANTHONY JUJUAN HOPKINS, )

)

 Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.14-00528-WS-B

)

CHRISTOPHER GORDY, )

)

 Respondent. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this 

file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo

determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to 

which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as 

the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and 

is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as time-barred and, further, 

that a certificate of appealability is hereby DENIED.

DONE this 24th day of March, 2016.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00528-WS-B Document 33 Filed 03/24/16 Page 1 of 1
#### Antonio Navarro, Respondent, v Dropattie Singh, Appellant.

[973 NYS2d 77]

*498Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann BriganttiHughes, J.), entered August 3, 2012, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment against her, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff satisfied his burden of establishing personal jurisdiction over defendant by service of the summons and complaint pursuant to CPLR 308 (2). At the traverse hearing, the process server testified that he served defendant’s sister, a person of suitable age and discretion, and mailed a copy of the summons and complaint to defendant. We find no basis to disturb the hearing court’s determination to credit his testimony. That the affidavit of service filed by the process server incorrectly indicates that service was on the “Individual” defendant, and does not indicate that the summons and complaint was mailed to defendant, does not warrant a different result. These are mere irregularities which do not divest the court of jurisdiction (see *Bell v Bell, Kalnick, Klee & Green,*246 AD2d 442, 443 [1st Dept 1998]; *Mendez v Kyung Yoo,*23 AD3d 354 [2d Dept 2005]; *Mrwik v Mrwik,*49 AD2d 750 [2d Dept 1975]). These irregularities in the affidavit of service did not stop or toll defendant’s time to answer (see *e.g. Morrissey v Sostar, S.A.,*63 AD2d 944 [1st Dept 1978]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Friedman, J.P., Richter, Feinman and Gische, JJ.
Exhibit 32


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XVIII  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form  10-Q  for
the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XVIII, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XVIII,  Inc.,  each  certify, pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XVIII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 12, 2009



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XVIII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 12, 2009
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of FieldPoint Petroleum Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ray Reaves, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  __/s/ Ray Reaves________ Ray Reaves Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer November 12, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

HERMAN O. HELLAMS,

Appellant

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 93 MAP 2022

Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court dated June 3,

2022 at No. 584 MD 2020

O RDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of July , 2023

, the June 3, 2022, Order granting

Preliminary Objections filed by the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and

dismissing Appellant’s Petition for Mandamus is VACATED

.

Consistent throughout Appellant’s filings and his communications with Appellee

are his averments that he filed a timely administrative appeal by submitting an

Administrative Relief Form and accompanying letter on April 27, 2017

, and that Appellee

has failed in its duty to act on th at appeal. 1 “ Mandamus has been held to be the prope r

remedy to compel the Board to conduct a required hearing or to correct a mistake in

applying the law. ” Donnell v. Com., Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole , 434 A.2d 846, 846

– 47 (Pa.

Cmwlth. 1981) ( citing Commonwealth ex rel. Davis v. Pa. Bd. of Parole , 398 A.2d 992

( Pa. 1979) (additional citation omitted) )

. Appellee has not offered any response to

1 See 61 Pa.C.S. § 6113 (d).[ 93 MAP 2022 ]

- 2

Appellant’s averments before the Commonwealth Court or this Court. Accordingly, this

aspect of the issues raised in Appellant’s Petition for Mandamus is appropri ately

addressed to the Commonwealth Court’s original jurisdiction and the court erred in

concluding otherwise

. Additionally, the Commonwealth Court erred in concluding

, without

providing any supporting findings of fact or explanation, that Appellant’s adm inistrative

appeal rights had lapsed. We REMAND the case for the court to conduct appropriate

further proceedings and/or fact finding to determine if Appellant is due relief. Jurisdiction

relinquished

.
Exhibit 10.3


 





July 30, 2015


 


 


Robert Sand, CEO


FBEC Worldwide, Inc.


1621 Central Avenue


Cheyenne, WY 82001


 


Re: Letter of Resignation of Darren Hamans


 


 


Dear Robert,


 


I am tendering my immediate resignation
as an Employee and Director of FBEC Worldwide, Inc. as of July 30, 2015.


 


My decision was based upon how I could better serve the company
as an outside contractor. I look forward to our continued relationship in the future.


 


 


Sincerely,


 





Darren Hamans