alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2103 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for District of Columbia, 

Federal Payment for the DC National Guard for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for District of Columbia, Federal Payment for the DC National 

Guard for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL PAYMENT 

5 FOR THE DC NATIONAL GUARD FOR FISCAL 

6 YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for District of Columbia, Federal Payment for the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2103 IH

1 DC National Guard for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $435,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The attached Financial Data Schedule should be read in conjunction with
Netegrity, Inc.'s Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,961,045
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  688,892
<ALLOWANCES>                                    66,460
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,530,079
<PP&E>                                          68,271
<DEPRECIATION>                                (33,448)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,532,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,163,594
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        92,699
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,275,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,532,082
<SALES>                                      1,120,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,120,260
<CGS>                                          570,892
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,072,857
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               304,432
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,283,438)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,283,438)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,283,438)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1843 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1843

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
 exemption for telehealth services from certain high deductible health 
                              plan rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 2023

Mrs. Steel (for herself, Mrs. Lee of Nevada, Mr. Smith of Nebraska, and 
Mr. Schneider) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
 exemption for telehealth services from certain high deductible health 
                              plan rules.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Telehealth Expansion Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FOR TELEHEALTH SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (E) of section 223(c)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(E) Safe harbor for absence of deductible for 
                telehealth.--A plan shall not fail to be treated as a 
                high deductible health plan by reason of failing to 
                have a deductible for telehealth and other remote care 
                services.''.
    (b) Certain Coverage Disregarded.--Clause (ii) of section 
223(c)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
striking ``(in the case of months or plan years to which paragraph 
(2)(E) applies)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 248 (Monday, December 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 78062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30315]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XD684


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) Fixed 
Gear Electronic Monitoring (EM) workgroup will meet in Anchorage, AK.

DATES: The meetings will be held January 12-13, 2015, from 1 p.m. to 5 
p.m. and 8 a.m. to 12 p.m., respectively.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the Hilton Hotel, Aspen/Spruce 
Room, 500 W 3rd Avenue, Anchorage, AK.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 
4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diana Evans, Council staff; telephone: 
(907) 271-2809.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The agenda is to finalize the 2015 EM 
Cooperative Research Plan and discuss funding and timelines for the 
research plan, pre-implementation, and the Council analysis to 
integrate EM into the observer program.
    The Agenda is subject to change, and the latest version will be 
posted at http://www.npfmc.org/.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, in accordance with the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), 
those issues may not be the subject of formal action during these 
meetings. Actions will be restricted to those issues specifically 
identified in this notice and any issues arising after publication of 
this notice that require emergency action under section 305(c) of the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has been notified of the 
Council's intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Gail Bendixen at (907) 271-2809 at 
least 7 working days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: December 22, 2014.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-30315 Filed 12-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
<page>	EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund II L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
A. Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		November 15, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Elvis Martin, Appellant.

[872 NYS2d 16]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dominic R. Mas-saro, J.), rendered November 1, 2006, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

When the court ordered a joint trial over defendant’s objection, and permitted the People to introduce the nontestifying codefendants’ statements, without redacting references to defendant, this was error under *Bruton v United States*(391 US 123 [1968]). However, we find the error harmless *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230 [1975]) in that there was overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt based upon the testimony of his cousin. The references to defendant in the codefendants’ statements could not have affected the verdict. These brief references merely placed defendant at the scene, and his presence at the scene was essentially consistent with the defense theory of the case. Defendant’s argument that the court should have delivered a limiting instruction is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. With regard to defendant’s independent Confrontation Clause claim under *Crawford v Washington*(541 US 36 [2004]) based on the testimonial nature of the statements *(see generally United States v Lung Fong Chen,*393 F3d 139, 150 [2004]), we likewise find any error harmless. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Buckley, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1810 

To require the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to issue a rule 

before deleting or modifying certain small business loan data, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2023 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER (for himself, Mr. HILL, and Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 

to issue a rule before deleting or modifying certain small 

business loan data, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bank Loan Privacy 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RULEMAKING REQUIREMENT. 

7 Section 704B(e)(4) of the Equal Credit Opportunity 

8 Act (15 U.S.C. 1691c–2(e)(4)) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1810 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘The Bureau may,’’ and insert2 ing: 

3 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Bureau may,’’; 

4 and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(B) RULEMAKING REQUIREMENT.—The 

7 Bureau shall, before deleting or modifying data 

8 under this paragraph issue, through advance 

9 notice and comment, a rule that includes a de10 scription of what modifications and deletions 

11 the Bureau intends to make to the data and 

12 how such modifications and deletions will ad13 vance a privacy interest.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

The Board of Directors 

XM Satellite RadioHoldings Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe registration statements Nos. 333-47570, 333-93529, 333-89132, 333-85804, 333-102966, 333-106824 and 333-102964 on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-92049, 333-65022, 333-65020, 333-97611 and 333-106827 on Form S-8 of XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. andsubsidiaries of our report dated February 5, 2004 except for Note 9(i), which is as of March 3, 2004 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and therelated consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003 and our report dated February 5, 2004 on the related schedule, which appear in theDecember 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries. Those reports contain an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.142, *Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,* as of January 1, 2002. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

McLean, VA

March 12, 2004
11928.

#### Bank of LaGrange *v.*Guinn *et al.*

Broyles, C. J.

1. Where a bank receives cotton as collateral security for a debt evidenced by certain promissory notes, and thereafter makes an express contract with the owner of the cotton, that if the latter will sell a portion of the cotton and apply the proceeds of the sale as part payment on the notes, it (the bank) will hold the remainder of the cotton until instructed by the owner to sell, and where the owner carries out his part of the contract, and the bank, without instruction from the owner, sells the remainder of the cotton, the owner is entitled to recover damages, and the measure of the damages would be the difference between the price for which the cotton was sold and the highest proved market value thereof, at the place where it was sold, at any time between the date of the sale and the date of the trial. *Wood*v. *Jones,*10 *Ga. App.*735 (75 S. E. 1099) ; *Campbell*v. *Redwine,*22 *Ga. App.*455 (96 S. E. 347).

*412Decided March 8, 1921.

Trover; from city court of LaGrange — W. T. Tuggle, judge pro hac vice. October 19, 1920.

*L. L. Meadors, E. T. Moon,*for plaintiff in error.

*M. U. Mooty, 8. Holderness,*contra.

2. Under tlie above ruling, the verdict was authorized by the evidence; and, the motion for a new trial containing only the usual general grounds, the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Lulce and' Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2090 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2090

 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for District of 
Columbia, Federal Payment for Resident Tuition Support for fiscal year 
                                 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for District of 
Columbia, Federal Payment for Resident Tuition Support for fiscal year 
                                 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DISTRICT OF 
              COLUMBIA, FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR RESIDENT TUITION SUPPORT 
              FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for District of Columbia, 
Federal Payment for Resident Tuition Support for fiscal year 2024 may 
not exceed $40,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7211** 

FELTON ANTHONY WIGGINS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Ea stern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. ( 5:09

- hc

- 02116

- FL )

Submitted : December 16 , 2010 Decided: December 28, 2010

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per c uriam opinion

.
Felton Anthony Wiggins, Appellant Pro Se. William E.H. Creech, Tobin Webb Lathan, Joshua Bryan Royster, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Felton Anthony Wiggins , a federal prisoner, appeals
the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A.

§ 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, altho ugh we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wiggins v. United States , No. 5:09

- hc

- 02116

- FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

a dequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
PXD-exx10220150630






EXHIBIT 10.2


    
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC. 
401(k) AND MATCHING PLAN 
(Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2013)


THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. (the “Company”):
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. 401(k) and Matching Plan (the “Plan”);
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.3 of the Plan, the Benefit Plan Design Committee (the “Committee”) of the Company maintains the authority to amend the Plan at any time; and
WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan to provide for full and immediate vesting in any employer-derived benefits accrued under the Plan for certain employees who are involuntarily terminated in connection with the sale by the Company of its ownership interest in EFS Midstream LLC.
NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows.
1.    Section 5.3(m) is hereby added to the Plan as follows:
(m)    Any provision of this Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, the amounts credited to the Employer Account of a Participant who is specifically designated by the Vice President-Administration of the Company as being involuntarily terminated in connection with the sale by the Company of its ownership interest in EFS Midstream LLC to a third party shall become fully vested and nonforfeitable on the date of such involuntary termination.  
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further provided that except as provided above, the Plan shall continue to read in its current state.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Fourth Amendment this 7th day of July, 2015 to be effective as specified above.
	
			
	 
	PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	By:/s/ Larry N. Paulsen

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Name: Larry N. Paulsen

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Title: Vice President, Administration
EXHIBIT 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.’s 333-160486, 333-151686, 333-148041, 333-126306, 333-122708, 333-116449, 333-103622, 333-64246, 333-56576, 333-32666) of our report dated June 29, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Selectica, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the two year period ended March 31, 2010.





/s/ Armanino McKenna LLPSan Ramon, CaliforniaJune 29, 2010
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

JIANGUO HAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-10475

D.C. No. 

2:15-cr-00069-JCM-NJK-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 17, 2018** 

San Francisco, California

Before: HAWKINS and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and EATON,*** Judge.

 

FILED

OCT 22 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** Richard K. Eaton, Judge of the United States Court of International

Trade, sitting by designation.
Jianguo Han (“Han”) appeals his convictions for conspiracy to manufacture,

and manufacture of, more than 100 marijuana plants, claiming insufficient evidence. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

1

Police seized 908 marijuana plants from inside two residential properties, both

owned by Han’s wife. Drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of the government,

United States v. Alvarez-Valenzuela, 231 F.3d 1198, 1201-02 (9th Cir. 2000), the

evidence presented at trial showed that Han, along with another man, unloaded “grow

lights” from a U-Haul truck at one of the properties. Additionally, Han was

apprehended attempting to flee the neighborhood surrounding that property while

smelling of cultivated marijuana and driving a van that was carrying several “bundles”

of potting soil. Han had previously been seen parking the van at the property on a

regular basis. Further, Han’s son told police that he had helped his father cultivate

marijuana at the second property from which marijuana plants were seized. Given this

evidence, a “rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of”

1 Han failed to preserve his sufficiency of the evidence claim. Accordingly, we

review for plain error to determine whether “‘any rational trier of fact could have

found the essential elements of the crime[s] beyond a reasonable doubt.’” United

States v. Phillips, 704 F.3d 754, 763 (9th Cir. 2012) (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443

U.S. 307, 319 (1979)).

2
conspiracy to manufacture, and manufacture of, more than 100 marijuana plants

“beyond a reasonable doubt.” See Phillips, 704 F.3d at 763.

AFFIRMED.

3
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1861 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Office of 

Senate Legal Counsel for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for 

Senate, Office of Senate Legal Counsel for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 SENATE, OFFICE OF SENATE LEGAL COUNSEL 

5 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Senate, Office of Senate Legal Counsel for fiscal 

9 year 2024 may not exceed $1,176,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS