alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9


       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999

<CASH>                                         3,389,398
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         6,801,818
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               1,950,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    537,060
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        92,421,413
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,599,348
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,138,494
<DEPOSITS>                                     106,135,461
<SHORT-TERM>                                   1,467,503
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            0
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       591,544
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,943,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 115,138,494
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                2,237,192
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              11,116
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               121,944
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               2,370,252
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1,176,675
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,176,675
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1,193,577
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  83,368
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1,449,522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                197,447
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     197,447
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   118,367
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 9.51
<LOANS-NON>                                    1,351,106
<LOANS-PAST>                                   1,872,482
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,516,705
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  1,953
<RECOVERIES>                                   1,228
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,599,348
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,599,348
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        1,553,137
        


</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1939 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Labor, 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Benefits, Cost of Administration for 

fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Labor, Office of Workers’ Compensation 

Benefits, Cost of Administration for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OFFICE OF WORK5 ERS’ COMPENSATION BENEFITS, COST OF AD6 MINISTRATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Department of Labor, Office of Workers’ ComVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:13 Apr 14, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1939.IH H1939

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1939 IH

1 pensation Benefits, Cost of Administration for fiscal year 

2 2024 may not exceed $74,777,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30045]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EF15-4-000]


Western Area Power Administration; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on December 4, 2014, the Western Area Power 
Administration submitted a tariff filing per 300.10: Rate Schedule L-
F10, placing Firm Electric Service rates for the Loveland Area Projects 
into effect beginning 1/1/2015.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#561013041519383a3f383305232626392422163033243578313920"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="75333027363a1b191c1b10260005051a070135131007165b121a03">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 5, 2015.

    Dated: December 17, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30045 Filed 12-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

DAVID WALLACE, * 

 * No. 12-888V 

 Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran 

 * 

v. * Filed: September 4, 2015 

 * 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Attorneys’ fees and costs; award

 * in the amount to which 

 Respondent. * respondent does not object. 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Danielle Anne Strait, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA Washington, DC, for 

Petitioner; 

Traci R. Patton, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. 

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS1

 On September 2, 2015, petitioner filed a stipulation of fact concerning final 

attorneys’ fees and costs in the above-captioned matter. Previously, petitioner 

submitted a draft application to respondent for review and after informal 

discussions regarding objections raised by respondent, petitioner agreed to amend 

his application to seek $35,912.50 for attorneys’ fees and costs. Respondent found 

petitioner’s application to be reasonable. The Court awards this amount. 

On December 17, 2012, David Wallace filed a petition for compensation

alleging that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which he received between October 7, 

2011 and October 14, 2011, caused him to suffer Guillain-Barré syndrome 

(“GBS”). Petitioner received compensation based upon the parties’ stipulation. 

Decision, issued June 4, 2015. Because petitioner received compensation, he is

entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e). 

 

 1 The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 

2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), 

the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other 

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special 

master will appear in the document posted on the website. 
Petitioner seeks a total of $35,912.50 in attorneys’ fees and costs for his

counsel. Additionally, in compliance with General Order No. 9, petitioner states 

that he did not incur any in out-of-pocket litigation expenses while pursuing this 

claim. Respondent has no objection to the amount requested for attorneys’ fees 

and costs. 

 After reviewing the request, the Court awards the following: 

A lump sum of $35,912.50 in the form of a check made payable to 

petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, Maglio Christopher & Toale, P.A., 

for attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa-15(e).

The Court thanks the parties for their cooperative efforts in resolving this 

matter. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. 

 Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Shannon Proctor, at (202) 

357-6360. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

 s/Christian J. Moran 

 Christian J. Moran 

 Special Master
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 8 , 2019

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 19 -00348- CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF DAVID ALLEN GARZA AND BRITTANY GARZA

On Appeal from the 300th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 95212-F

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a final decree signed March 27, 201 9 . The clerk’s

record was filed May 20, 201 9

. The reporter’s record was not filed.

On June 20, 201 9 , this court issued an order stating that unless a ppellant

filed a brief on or before July 22, 2019 , the court would dismiss the a ppeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(b).

Appellant filed no brief or other response. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered

dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Spain, and Poissant
##### 



Doral Financial Corporation
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 Six Month Period EndedJune 30, 2005Including Interest on DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax income from continuing operations
    
    $
    22,108Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    304,054Total Earnings
    
    $
    326,162Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    301,772Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized
expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    833An estimate of the interest component within rental expense
    
    
    1,449Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    304,054Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    1.07Excluding Interest on DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax income from continuing operations
    
    $
    22,108Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    258,419Total Earnings
    
    $
    280,527Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    256,137Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized
expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    833An estimate of the interest component within rental expense
    
    
    1,449Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    258,419Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    1.09
SCWC-10-0000225 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. BRYAN K.A. MULLER, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-10-0000225; CR. NO. 09-1-0879) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Reck tenwald, C.J., Nak ayama, Mc Kenna, Po llack, an d Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawaii’s application for writ of certiorari filed on March 28, 2014, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, April 29, 2014. James M. Anderson for petitioner Marcus B. Sierra for respondent /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-10-0000225 29-APR-2014 07:58 AM
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3657 ) LLOYD'S OF SHELTON AUTO GLASS, ) LLC, a/a/o JEDIDIAH THOMAS, ) ) Respondent. ) ) Opinion filed October 31, 2018. Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit for Hillsborough County; sitting in its appellate capacity. Alexandra Valdes of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, for Petitioner. Kristin A. Norse and Stuart C. Markman of Kynes, Markman & Felman, P.A., Tampa; David M. Caldevilla of de la Parte & Gilbert, P.A., Tampa; and John C. Murrow of Law Office of John C. Murrow, P.A., Tampa, for Respondent.
MORRIS, Judge.- 2 -The petitioner, Progressive Select Insurance Company, seeks a secondtier writ of certiorari to quash the circuit court's order that denied Progressive's petition for writ of certiorari below. While involving different parties, the facts and procedural history of this case are nearly identical to the facts and procedural history of another second-tier certiorari proceeding that is traveling with this case, Progressive American Insurance Co. v. SHL Enterprises, LLC, a/a/o Shazam Auto Glass, LLC, 2D17-4074. We quashed the order in SHL Enterprises, LLC, a/a/o Shazam Auto Glass, LLC, wherein the circuit court had adopted the reasoning of the circuit court's order that was entered in this case. Thus, for the reasons we explained in SHL Enterprises, LLC, a/a/o Shazam Auto Glass, LLC, we quash the circuit court's order here.

Petition granted; order quashed.

SILBERMAN and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1914 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1914

  To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Library of 
  Congress, Congressional Research Service, Salaries and Expenses for 
                           fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Library of 
  Congress, Congressional Research Service, Salaries and Expenses for 
                           fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, 
              CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE, SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR 
              FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Library of Congress, 
Congressional Research Service, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 
2024 may not exceed $125,688,000.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.2 Manos Contract Extension 2015






Exhibit 10.2


FORM OF EXTENSION OF TERM
OF EMPLOYMENT PERIOD
MEMORANDUM




		
	To:
	John G. Manos


		
	From:
	Patricia Smith Lawler,


EVP/Human Resources Division
		
	Re:
	Extension of Employment Period


		
	Date:
	June __, 2015




The Board of Directors of BankFinancial, F.S.B. (the “Bank”) and its Human Resources Committee have completed their annual review of your Employment Agreement with the Bank dated ____________, and have determined to offer to amend your Employment Agreement as follows:
		
	•
	to extend the term of the “Employment Period” as referenced in Section 2(a) of your Employment Agreement to ______________; 


		
	•
	all references to Regional President in the Employment Agreement are hereby changed to be references to President - Commercial Real Estate Lending Division; and


		
	•
	to add the following language to the end of Section 8(f) of your Employment Agreement:  “The Non-Solicitation Period shall be reduced from eighteen (18) months to six (6) months, but only with respect to the restrictions set forth in Subsection (b)(i) and Subsection (b)(iii) of Section 8 of this Agreement (and the prohibitions contained in Subsection (b)(viii) of Section 8 against aiding, abetting, inducing or conspiring with others to violate those restrictions), if Executive resigns his employment Without Cause more than six (6) months following the occurrence of a Change of Control.  The term “Change of Control” shall have the meaning provided in BankFinancial Corporation’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time.


If you are agreeable to amending your Employment Agreement as provided above, please sign and date this document in the space indicated below and return it to me by no later than ____________.
If you do not sign and return this document to me by such date, the term of your Employment Period and the Anniversary Date applicable to your Employment Agreement will remain unchanged.
	
		
	Name:
	 

	Signature:
	 

	Date:
Exhibit 32.2
**Written Statement of the ChiefFinancial Officer****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350**
     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, theundersigned Chief Financial Officer of Whitehall Limited, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBof the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
*/s/ Kay Carter*
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1678 

To limit the applicability of certain rules with regard to possession of a 

firearm or firearm attachment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2023 

Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To limit the applicability of certain rules with regard to 

possession of a firearm or firearm attachment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Legal Fire5 arms Ownership Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INAPPLICABILITY OF RULE. 

7 Any firearm or firearm attachment that was lawfully 

8 manufactured before the effective date of a new rule or 

9 regulation shall be grandfathered and shall be permitted 

10 to be sold, transferred, and possessed in accordance with 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1678 IH

1 the previous rule regime. The manufacturing date of a 

2 firearm or firearm attachment shall be determined by the 

3 serial number recorded on the firearm or firearm attach4 ment, or any other legal method of recording the date of 

5 manufacturing, including packaging. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Order entered March 31, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 19
- 01476
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF C .T.H. AND H.V.H., CH ILDREN On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 14
- 07021

ORDER Appellants, grandparents of the children, appeal from an order from family court denying their motion to dismiss pursuant to the Texas Citizens Participation
Act. See T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R EM
. C ODE A NN
. § 27.003 , 51.014(a)(12). Before the Court is appellee’s March 10, 2020 emergency motion to lift stay. Appellee asks this Court to lift the automatic stay invoked by appellants so that she can seek to modify possession and access to the chil dren and enforce child support and medical support against the father of the children

. See id

. § 51.014(b). Section 51.014(b) provides that “[a]n interlocutory appeal under Subsection (a), other than an appeal under Subsection (a)(4) or in a suit brough t under theFamily Code , stays the commencement of a trial in the trial court pending

resolution of the appeal.” See id . (E mphasis added). Because the underlying lawsuit was brought under the Family Code, the automatic stay of sec tion 51.014(b) does not apply. Accordingly, we DENY the motion as moot.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Sandra Jackson, Presiding Judge of the 302nd Judicial District Court, and , all parties. /s / BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18            U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In            connection with the Quarterly Report of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. (“CRM”)            on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the            Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,            Lawrence Fensterstock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18            U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of            2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of                            section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                            and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

             

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,                            in all material respects, the financial condition and results of                            operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | By:  /s/ Lawrence Fensterstock |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|

Lawrence Fensterstock

Chief Financial Officer

 

November 12, 2007

 

21

 

----