alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30005]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Pathology Support for The National 
Toxicology Program and The Division of Intramural Research, NIEHS.
    Date: January 15-16, 2015.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Hilton Garden Inn Durham Southpoint, 7007 Fayetteville 
Road, Durham, NC 27713.
    Contact Person: RoseAnne M. McGee, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research and 
Training Nat. Institute of Environmental Health, Sciences P.O. Box 
12233, MD EC-30, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 (919) 541-0752 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#19747a7e7c7c285977707c716a37777071377e766f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="05686662606034456b6c606d762b6b6c6d2b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, 
Biometry and Risk Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental 
Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety 
Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic 
Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development 
in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to 
Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research 
and Testing, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: December 17, 2014.
Carolyn Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-30005 Filed 12-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 23.01

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos., 333-77068, and 333-46624) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-87505, 333-92159, 333-93591, 333-32460, 333-35730, 333-64552, 333-59842, 333-55822 and 333-104711) of KANA Software, Inc., previously Kana Communications, Inc., of our report dated March 17, 2004, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose, California 

March 19, 2004
[967 NYS2d 650]

#### In the Matter of Nikia L. Way (Also Known as Nikia Lynne Way), a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

June 27, 2013

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Jorge Dopico, Chief Counsel, Departmental Disciplinary Committee,*New York City *{Kathy Wu*of counsel), for petitioner. *Nikia L. Way,*respondent pro se.

*149OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent Nikia L. Way was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on February 25, 2009.* At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent has maintained business addresses within the First Judicial Department.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order, pursuant to Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR) § 603.4 (g), disbarring respondent from the practice of law, on the ground that she has been suspended under 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (i) (100 AD3d 40 [2012]) and has not appeared or applied in writing to the Committee or this Court for a hearing or reinstatement for more than six months from the date of the order of suspension.

On October 12, 2012, the Committee served respondent with a notice of entry of this Court’s October 11, 2012 order of suspension by mailing same to her home address by first-class mail and certified mail return receipt requested. The Committee’s notice of motion seeking respondent’s interim suspension contained the following notice:

> “PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE, that pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (g), an attorney who is suspended and who has not appeared, or applied in writing to the Committee or this Court for a hearing or reinstatement, for six months from the date of the order of suspension, may be disbarred without further notice.”

More than six months have elapsed since the date of this Court’s October 11, 2012 order of suspension, and respondent has failed to seek a hearing or reinstatement. As such, disbarment is warranted *(Matter of Reis,*105 AD3d 62 [1st Dept 2013]; *Matter of Claffey,*99 AD3d 201 [1st Dept 2012]; *Matter of Millstone,*98 AD3d 329 [1st Dept 2012]; *Matter of Burke,*62 AD3d 94 [1st Dept 2009]).

Accordingly, the Committee’s motion to disbar respondent, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (g), should be granted and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

*150Acosta, J.E, Renwick, DeGrasse, Freedman and. Richter, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred, and her name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof.

*

 Respondent, pro se, has not appeared in this proceeding.
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
P AUL HANSMEIER , ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-1410 (UNA) ) WILLIAM P. BARR , ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION
T his matter, brought pro se , is before the C ourt on review of the complaint and plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis . The Court will grant the in forma pauperis application and dismiss the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (requiring immediate dismissal of a prisoner ’s action upon a determination that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted ).
A “complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). Plaintiff is a federal prisoner incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution in Sandstone, Minnesota. He wants to sue individuals for copyright infringement but allegedly “faces a credible risk of criminal prosecution for fraud and extortion in connection with bringing his copyright enfor cement cases

. ” Compl. ¶ 19. Apparently, this would add to Plaintiff’s indictment in “late -2016” for mail and wir e fraud based on similar “enforcement” conduct , id

. ¶ 11 , which he moved unsuccessfully to dismiss. S ee United States v. Hansmeier , No. 16- cr -00334, 2017 WL 3971874, at *1 (D. Minn. Sept. 8, 2017) (“ The Indictment in this criminal case against Defendant Paul R. Hansmeier charges him in 18 7 /1 6/20202 counts, including one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud, five counts of mail fraud, ten counts of wire fraud, one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, and one count of conspiracy to commit and suborn perjury. ”)

. Plaintiff wants this Court to “enjoin ” U.S. Attorney General William Barr “from pursuing [ Plaintiff ] and those assisting him for fraud or extortion for enforcing copyrights v ia the Olan Mills method.” Compl. ¶ 3 ( citing Olan Mills, Inc. v. Linn Photo Co ., 23 F.3d 1345, 1347-48 (8th Cir. 1994) (upholding investigative scheme of copyright holder that merely provided the suspected infringer “an opportunity to infringe upon four clearly marked copyrights ”) ). T he Attorney General has absolute discretion in deciding whether to investigate claims for possible criminal or civil prosecution, and, as a general rule applicable here, such decisions are not subject to judicial review. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Reno , 56 F.3d 1476, 1480-81 (D.C. Cir. 1995); see Heckler v. Chaney , 470 U.S. 821, 831 (1985) (“[A]n agency’s decision not to prosecute or enforce, whether through civil or criminal process, is a decision generally committed to an agency’s absolute discretion.”) ; United States v. Nixon , 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974) (acknowledging that the Executive Branch “has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case”). Therefore, Plaintiff has stated no plausible claim to relief

. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

/s / JAMES E. BOASBERG United States District Judge
DAT E: Ju ly 16, 2020
EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection
with the Annual Report of Kana Software, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John
M. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.02, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





|                    |  |                                          |  | 
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: July 6, 2006 |  | /s/ JOHN M. THOMPSON                     |  | 
|                    |  | John M. Thompson Chief Financial
Officer |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 24, 2017

t0117

Order 

Clerk

January 24, 2017

153846

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153846

COA: 326209 

Genesee CC: 13-034264-FC

JOSEPH DANTE LEE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 19, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of People v Collins (Docket No. 153952) is pending on appeal before this Court and 

that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for 

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the 

decision in that case.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. §1350**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and in connection with the annual report of Cytomedix, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, I, Dr. Kshitij
      Mohan,, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to the
      best
      of my knowledge and belief:




1. The
      Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934; and




2. The
      information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company for said period.




/s/Dr. Kshitij
      Mohan


Dr. Kshitij
      Mohan




Chief
      Executive Officer


Date:
      February 26, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement has been provided to Cytomedix, Inc. and
      will
      be retained by Cytomedix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
#### City of Paducah *v. A.*S. Jones’s Adm’x, et al.

City — Street Improvements — Payments for.

The city is liable for such improvements of a public street as are ordered by it; and if there is a contract between the contractor and the owners of the real estate by which the owners are to pay for such work or any part thereof, the city to avoid payment must set up such contract by way of answer.

APPEAL FROM McCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT.

September 22, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

We perceive no error in the judgment against the. city. The evidence does not, in our opinion, establish the existence of a street across the “reserved ground,” either by express or implied recognition by appellee or its vendors.

The city, having directed the improvement to be made, cannot escape payment to the contractor on the ground that there was no street at the place where the work was done. It was the duty of the *62mayor and council, and not of the contractor, to know whether or not there was a street at the place directed to be improved. Nor can the city, under the pleadings in this case, escape the payment of any part of the sum now due the contractor.

*D. A. McGaugill, for appellant.*

*P. D. Yeiser, for appellees.*

It is true he agreed to look to the owners of property for all the work done under private contracts, and it is also' true that Harris, who seems to have owned one-fourth, and Norton, who seems to have owned two-thirds of one-fourth of the reserved ground, signed contract, but one of the appellees, Jones, sued the railroad company and Morrow for the whole amount due for the entire work done on this part of the street. Having alleged facts which rendered the city liable in case the owners of the property were not, it was the duty of the city to set up such defense as it had, and if it meant to rely for exoneration on the fact that a part of the work, the price of which was sued for, was done under private contract, it should have set forth the facts in its answer.

There is no allegation in the answer that Norton or Harris had signed the private contract; and there was, therefore, nothing on which to base the action of the circuit court in deducting the amount of their supposed liability from the amount shown by the estimates to be due to Jones. The petition showed that Morrow had .signed the contract; the evidence shows that he had paid his share of the assessment; and the judgment was right,- both as to him, and also as to the deduction made for the payment made by him.

But as Norton & Harris signed the contract, and were probably liable to Jones’ administratrix for their share of the work done on the reservation, the city ought to be allowed to amend its answer, and set up that fact, if it offers to do so in a reasonable time; and the plaintiff should also be allowed to amend her petition, if she desires to do so, so as to make Harris & Norton parties, and so as to enforce any lien that may exist on their interest in the land.

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed*on the original, and *reversed*on the cross-appeal, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TERRA BETTS, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

v. )

)

CONECUH COUNTY BOARD OF ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-00356-CG-N

EDUCATION, RONNIE BROGDEN )

and )

MARY ANN DANFORD, )

)

 Defendants. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo

determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, 

the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B)-(C) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and dated May 29, 2015, 

is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Defendants’ “Partial Motion to 

Dismiss” (Doc. 29) is GRANTED and that Count IV of the Second Amended 

Complaint (Doc. 28) is DISMISSED.

DONE and ORDERED this the 15th day of June, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00356-CG-N Document 35 Filed 06/15/15 Page 1 of 1
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19E0019. JASMINE LEIGH DOURESSEAUX v. AARON CHRISTIAN

THOMAS.

The Appellant in the above-styled case has filed a motion titled Emergency

Motion For Grant Of Stay Of Judgement And Enforcement Proceedings pursuant to

Court Rule 40 (b). After a thorough review of the materials submitted and the

applicable law, said motion is hereby DENIED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

November 20, 2018

11/20/2018
EXHIBIT 32.1





SELECTICA, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Selectica, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jason Stern, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: July 30, 2012





/S/ JASON STERNJason SternPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.3

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Barry N. Bycoff, certify that

         1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
                  Netegrity, Inc.;

         2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
                  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
                  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
                  circumstances under which such statements were made, not
                  misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
                  and

         3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
                  financial information included in this report, fairly present
                  in all material respects the financial condition, results of
                  operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
                  the periods presented in this report.

Date: January 29, 2004                   /s/ Barry N. Bycoff
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Barry N. Bycoff
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1987 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1987

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
   Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National 
Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders for fiscal year 
                                 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
   Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National 
Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders for fiscal year 
                                 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 
              AND HUMAN SERVICES, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH 
              NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION 
              DISORDERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Health and 
Human Services, National Institutes of Health National Institute on 
Deafness and Other Communication Disorders for fiscal year 2024 may not 
exceed $474,404,000.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-90163) pertaining to the InterTrust Technologies Corporation
1992 Stock Plan, 1995 Stock Plan, 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, 1999 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan and 1999 Non-Employee Directors Option Plan and Options
Granted Pursuant to Written Compensation Agreements and the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-94961) pertaining to the InterTrust Technologies
Corporation 1992 Stock Plan, 1995 Stock Plan and Shares Acquired under Written
Compensation Agreements with respect to the consolidated financial statements
of InterTrust Technologies Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 29, 2000