alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1957 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health 

and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration 

Health Care Systems for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration Health Care Systems for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1957 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV3 ICES, HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES 

4 ADMINISTRATION HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS 

5 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Department of Health and Human Services, 

9 Health Resources and Services Administration Health 

10 Care Systems for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

11 $115,193,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
11388.

#### Rushton *v.*Hall & Brown Woodworking Machine Co.

Stephens, J.

1. Where two parties by negotiations through written correspondence have arrived at an agreement which, without more, amounts to a complete contract, but immediately thereafter, and before the performance by either party of any act under the agreement, execute a formal agreement in writing containing other stipulations regarding the subject-matter in addition to those contained in the correspondence, the contract between the parties will be considered as having been completed only upon the execution of the formal written agreement, and the latter will be regarded as the contract. It is not void for want of consideration upon the ground that at the time of its execution the promisor was already bound to the promisee under another contract. See, in this connection, 1 Williston on Contracts, § 28; 7 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law (2d ed.), 139.

2. Where the signature of the maker of a written instrument purports to have been witnessed by a subscribing witness, any error in admitting the instrument in evidence without producing the subscribing witness is cured when the maker afterwards in his testimony admits the execution of the instrument.

3. Where such a formal contract contains certain stipulations against the interest of the purchaser which were not contained in the preliminary negotiations, a statement made by the seller to the purchaser, to the effect that the seller desired that the contract be placed in formal shape for his convenience in keeping a record of the transaction, cannot amount to a fraud on the purchaser upon the ground that by such statement he was induced to execute the instrument containing such stipulations. It not appearing that the other representations relied on by the purchaser as fraudulent were false, the defense that the execution of the contract was induced by fraud is not sustained.

*371Decided March 4, 1921.

Complaint; from Campbell superior court — Judge Hutcheson. February 5, 1920.

*Johnson & Scott,*for plaintiff in error.

TF. *S. Dillon, Q. M. Lancaster, W. J. Davis Jr.,*contra.

4. “When the written contract for the sale of an article provides that the retention of the article for a given time after the date of shipment shall constitute a trial and acceptance and be a conclusive admission of the truth of all warranties, the mere fact that within the time stipulated notice of dissatisfaction has been given to the seller, but notwithstanding the article has been retained, will not have the effect to relieve the buyer from the force of the terms of the written contract.” *Fay*& *Eagan Co.*v. *Dudley,*129 *Ga.*314(2) (58 S. E. 826).

5. In a suit by the seller against the purchaser to recover the purchase-money for the property sold under the contract, a verdict for the plaintiff was properly directed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*JenMns, P. J., and Sill, J., concur.*
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Accountants**

Materialise NV 

Leuven, Belgium 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-197236 and No. 333-212445) and Form F-3 (No.333-213649 and No. 333-226006) of Materialise NV of our report dated June 26, 2018, relating to the financial statements of RSPRINT Powered by Materialise NV which appears in this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F ofMaterialise NV. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. 

BDO BedrijfsrevisorenCVBA 

On behalf of it, 

Veerle Catry 

/s/ Veerle Catry 

Zaventem, Belgium 

June 28, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for World Monitor Trust II--Series D
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK>               0001090697
<NAME>              World Monitor Trust II--Series D
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1999

<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1999

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          1,000

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,000

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,000

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      1,000

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,000

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    0

<EPS-BASIC>                   0

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

ALLEN D. BRUFSKY

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 2148 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 

Board File No. C1-15-185 

(Supreme Court of Florida, 

Case Nos. SC11-1528 and SC11-2139) 

Attorney Registration No. 79969 

(Out of State) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM: 

 AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2015, Allen D. Brufsky having been 

disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Florida by the Order of the Supreme 

Court of Florida filed August 7, 2013; the said Allen D. Brufsky having been directed on 

March 26, 2015, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the 

identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the 

reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is 

 ORDERED that Allen D. Brufsky is disbarred from the practice of law in 

this Commonwealth and he shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    11,271,500,000
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                  64,000,000
<MORTGAGE>                               2,233,700,000
<REAL-ESTATE>                               34,100,000
<TOTAL-INVEST>                          14,581,500,000
<CASH>                                      36,300,000
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                         514,200,000
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                   1,337,400,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          23,346,200,000
<POLICY-LOSSES>                         13,617,300,000
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                             478,400,000
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                      336,100,000
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                            615,700,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      242,500,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       900,000
<OTHER-SE>                               1,894,100,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            23,346,200,000
<PREMIUMS>                                 559,400,000
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                        559,600,000
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           1,600,000
<OTHER-INCOME>                             348,400,000
<BENEFITS>                                 808,600,000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                 58,200,000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                       316,200,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            222,800,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                80,100,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        136,100,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               136,100,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.52
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PATRICIA A. REYNOLDS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0235-CG-N

)

MEGAN BRENNAN, 1

United States Postmaster General

)

)

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo 

determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, 

the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636 and dated 

February 1, 2016, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED this 25th day of February, 2016.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 1 Plaintiff sued Patrick Donahoe, the Postmaster General, in his official capacity in May 

2014. Doc. 1. Megan Brennan was installed as the Postmaster General by the U.S. Postal Service 

Board of Governors effective February 1, 2015.

Case 1:14-cv-00235-CG-N Document 43 Filed 02/25/16 Page 1 of 1
#### M. P. Hiatt *v.*Ben F. Field.

Liability of Assignor of Note — Waiver of Diligence.

Where, notwithstanding no sufficient diligence is shown to make an . assignor liable, the assignor at the time of making the assignment made an agreement with the holder of the note that he would remain bound, he is not released.

APPEAL PROM JEFFERSON COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.

September 14, 1876.

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

The appellee did not use such diligence as would render the appellant liable on the contract of assignment. But the writing exhibited with the petition evidences an agreement on the part of the appellant to remain bound, although legal diligence might not be used.

The evidence tends to prove that that writing was executed as a part of the same transaction in which the note was assigned; and as it recites that it was executed on the same day, we should be bound, if necessary to support the judgment, to presume that the court found as a fact that they were executed at the same time. But that is not necessary, for no matter whether executed at that time or subsequently, so it was executed before the appellant was discharged from liability, it is valid, and that, too, whether there was any consideration for its execution or not.

*741
      *John B.*Cochran, *for appellent. D. M. Rodman, for appellee.*

The appellant had a right to waive due diligence in prosecuting the obligor, and to consent to remain bound; and having done so while he was yet liable, he cannot now avail himself of laches to which he consented in order to escape liability.

The writing was not skilfully worded, but there can be no doubt but that it was intended as a waiver of the right. The appellant would otherwise have had to be discharged if the obligor was not prosecuted with legal diligence. It is true the language- is, that he was to remain liable if the appellee did not sue to the first court, and that there is no stipulation that he would remain bound if suit was brought and execution was not issued in due time. But there is no escaping the conclusion that the object was to waive legal diligence, and, unless such was the object, the writing was meaningless.

The judgment is *affirmed.*
II 

Calendar No. 414 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 192 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 3, 2024 

Received; read the first time 

JUNE 4, 2024 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To prohibit individuals who are not citizens of the United 

States from voting in elections in the District of Columbia and to repeal the Local Resident Voting Rights 

Amendment Act of 2022. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITING VOTING BY NONCITIZENS IN DIS4 TRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTIONS. 

5 An individual who is not a citizen of the United 

6 States may not vote in an election for public office in the 

7 District of Columbia or in any ballot initiative or ref8 erendum in the District of Columbia. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 192 PCS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LOCAL RESIDENT VOTING RIGHTS 

2 AMENDMENT ACT OF 2022. 

3 The Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act 

4 of 2022 (D.C. Law 24–242) is repealed, and any provision 

5 of law amended or repealed by such Act shall be restored 

6 or revived as if such Act had not been enacted into law. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 414 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 192 

AN ACT 

To prohibit individuals who are not citizens of the 

dent Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022. trict of Columbia and to repeal the Local ResiUnited States from voting in elections in the DisJUNE 4, 2024 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1993 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1993

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
   Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National 
  Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering for fiscal year 
                                 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
   Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National 
  Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering for fiscal year 
                                 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 
              AND HUMAN SERVICES, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH 
              NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND 
              BIOENGINEERING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Health and 
Human Services, National Institutes of Health National Institute of 
Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering for fiscal year 2024 may not 
exceed $389,464,000.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1853 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1853

   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, 
 Offices of the Secretaries of the Conference of the Majority and the 
            Conference of the Minority for fisal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, 
 Offices of the Secretaries of the Conference of the Majority and the 
            Conference of the Minority for fisal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR SENATE, OFFICES OF 
              THE SECRETARIES OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE MAJORITY AND THE 
              CONFERENCE OF THE MINORITY FOR FISAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Senate, Offices of the 
Secretaries of the Conference of the Majority and the Conference of the 
Minority for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $843,402.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         130,512
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,746
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               247,512
<PP&E>                                         147,613
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 404,380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,455
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,228
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,250
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (290,041)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  217,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                60,746
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       405
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (158,110)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1896 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1896

   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of 
Representatives Modernization Initiatives Account for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of 
Representatives Modernization Initiatives Account for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR HOUSE OF 
              REPRESENTATIVES MODERNIZATION INITIATIVES ACCOUNT FOR 
              FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for House of Representatives 
Modernization Initiatives Account for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 
$2,000,000.
                                 <all>
```