alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.02

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                           2002 (Rule 13a-14(a) Certification)

I, Frank W. Backes, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of 3Si
Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date");
and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
Registrant's internal controls; and

6. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                                       By:/s/ Frank W. Backes
                                       Frank W. Backes, CTO/CFO
Date:  November 13, 2003
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1868 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Official Mail 

Costs for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for 

Senate, Official Mail Costs for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 SENATE, OFFICIAL MAIL COSTS FOR FISCAL 

5 YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Senate, Official Mail Costs for fiscal year 2024 

9 may not exceed $300,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1798 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1798

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to render an individual, who 
 transfers certain educational assistance, to which the individual is 
  entitled because of an agreement by such individual to serve in the 
   Armed Forces, to a dependent of that individual, and who fails to 
  complete such agreement, solely liable for the overpayment of such 
            educational assistance, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 2023

Mr. Van Orden introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to render an individual, who 
 transfers certain educational assistance, to which the individual is 
  entitled because of an agreement by such individual to serve in the 
   Armed Forces, to a dependent of that individual, and who fails to 
  complete such agreement, solely liable for the overpayment of such 
            educational assistance, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Military Dependents Act''.

SEC. 2. SOLE LIABILITY FOR TRANSFERRED EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE BY AN 
              INDIVIDUAL WHO FAILS TO COMPLETE A SERVICE AGREEMENT.

    Subsection (i) of section 3319 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``In the event'' and inserting 
                ``Subject to paragraph (2), in the event''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``of this title'' after ``section 
                3685'';
            (2) in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2)--
                    (A) in the heading, by striking ``In general'' and 
                inserting ``Sole liability''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``for which the individual shall 
                be solely liable to the United States for the amount of 
                the overpayment for purposes of section 3685 of this 
                title'' before the period at the end; and
            (3) in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking 
                ``Subparagraph (A) shall not apply'' and inserting 
                ``Neither the individual nor the dependent shall be 
                liable to the United States for the amount of the 
                overpayment for purposes of section 3685 of this 
                title''; and
                    (B) in clause (ii), by inserting ``of this title'' 
                after ``section 3311(c)(4)''.
                                 <all>
```
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 8/30/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES CHAPMAN THAMER, II,

Petitioner - Appellant,

vs.

PAUL GRAF, UTAH STATE

CORRECTIONS and JAY GRAHAM,

Attorney General of the State of Utah,

Respondents - Appellees.

No. 95-4192

(D.C. No. 94-CV-969)

(D. Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, KELLY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.**

Petitioner Charles Chapman Thamer appeals from the district court’s denial of his

petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court adopted the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation which characterized the petition as largely unintelligible,

successive and containing unexhausted claims. The district court also noted that no
- 2 -

objection was taken to the magistrate’s report and recommendation, 1 R. doc. 8, despite

the required advice. See 1 R. doc. 6 at 3-4; Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659

(10th Cir. 1991). 

We construe Mr. Thamer’s application of a certificate of probable cause as an

application for a certificate of appealability now required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). See

Lennox v. Evans, No. 96-6041, 1996 WL 343632 at *1 (10th Cir. June 24, 1996). The

Application is DENIED for want of “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). All pending motions are DENIED and the

appeal is DISMISSED. 

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1983 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1983

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
 Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National Eye 
                    Institute for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
 Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National Eye 
                    Institute for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 
              AND HUMAN SERVICES, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH 
              NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Health and 
Human Services, National Institutes of Health National Eye Institute 
for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $796,536,000.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Genesis Technology Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gary Wolfson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Gary Wolfson
Gary Wolfson
Chief Executive Officer
January 15, 2003
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AMERICAN EAGLE MANUFACTURING CO. a
Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Form 10KSB, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to  AMERICAN EAGLE MANUFACTURING CO., and will be retained by AMERICAN
EAGLE MANUFACTURING CO. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Roger A. Warren
--------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
October 13, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BARCLIFF, LLC, d/b/a RADCLIFF/ :

ECONOMY MARINE SERVICES,

:

Plaintiff,

:

vs. CA 14-0590-C

: (ADMIRALTY)

M/V DEEP BLUE, IMO NO. 9215359, her

engines, apparel, furniture, equipment, :

appurtenances, tackle, etc., in rem,

:

Defendant.

ORDER 

The undersigned learned on January 22, 2016 that he will have not have access to 

a courtroom on February 17-19, 2016 that will allow the presentation of live testimony 

of witnesses via remove video linkup.1 Because intervenor ING Bank (and perhaps 

defendant M/V DEEP BLUE) intends to present live testimony in this case via remote 

video linkup, it is now necessary for the Court to CANCEL the trial of this matter on 

February 17-19, 2016. The parties are requested to advise the Court of their availability 

in March for rescheduling the trial of this matter.

2

DONE and ORDERED this the 25th day of January, 2016. 

 s/WILLIAM E. CASSADY 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 1 The undersigned’s courtroom is not equipped for such testimony and the 

courtrooms of Judge Callie Granade and Senior Judge Charles R. Butler are unavailable due to 

previously scheduled repairs being performed that week, as well as the week of February 22, 

2016. In addition, Judge Steele’s courtroom is unavailable because he has two cases scheduled to 

go to trial that week and Judge DuBose’s courtroom is unavailable because she anticipates the 

scheduling of several criminal trials that week.

2 The undersigned notes his availability during the weeks of March 7, 2016, March 

14, 2016, and March 21, 2016, save for the afternoon of March 11, 2016.

Case 1:14-cv-00590-C Document 83 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6462

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TERRI LYNN NAGY-PHILLIPS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief 

District Judge. (2:12-cr-00037-RBS-DEM-1; 2:13-cv-00456-RBS)

Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 3, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terri Lynn Nagy-Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. Randy Carl Stoker, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Terri Lynn Nagy-Phillips seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter 

or amend the court’s order denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because 

the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a 

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty 

days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or 

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he 

timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on November 6, 2013. The notice of appeal was filed on March 

18, 2014.*

 Because Nagy-Phillips failed to file a timely notice 

of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal 

period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 

(1988). 
3

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



Exhibit
    12.1
  Doral
    Financial Corporation
    Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
  For the six month period endedJune 30, 2007Including Interest on
    DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax income from continuing
    operations

$
(67,830)Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding
    capitalized interest)


239,252Total Earnings

$
171,422Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized

$
237,279Amortized premiums, discounts, and
    capitalized
    expenses related to indebtedness


419An estimate of the interest
    component within rental expense


1,554Total Fixed Charges

$
239,252Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
    Charges


(A)Excluding Interest on
    DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax income from continuing
    operations

$
(67,830)Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding
    capitalized interest)


152,359Total Earnings

$
84,529Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized

$
150,386Amortized premiums, discounts, and
    capitalized
    expenses related to indebtedness


419An estimate of the interest
    component within rental expense


1,554Total Fixed Charges

$
152,359Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
    Charges


(A)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,113,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,631,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                    38,559
<INVENTORY>                                    342,481
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,131,029
<PP&E>                                         734,156
<DEPRECIATION>                                 324,198
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,178,604
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,382,658
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       392,934
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,344,509
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,178,604
<SALES>                                      5,316,431
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,301,642
<CGS>                                        4,787,522
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,082,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,117,282
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                15,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,735
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,148
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             45,148
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    45,148
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Foundry
Networks, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Bobby R. Johnson Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Bobby R. Johnson,
Jr.




Bobby R. Johnson, Jr. Chief Executive Officer
and President March 15, 2004


---
Exhibit
32.1
  Certification
of Principal Executive Officer
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of Mandalay Media, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does
hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
 
 The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 of the Company
(the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: August
14, 2009
  /s/
      James LefkowitzJames
      LefkowitzPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)
 
 42
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RAYMOND FLOYD HESS, :

:

 Petitioner, :

:

vs. : CIVIL ACTION NO.12-00664-KD-B

:

STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., :

:

 Respondent. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this 

file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been 

no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED

as the opinion of this Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED 

for lack of jurisdiction.

DONE this 16th day of February 2016.

s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00664-KD-B Document 23 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 1