alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                    9

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                               4,953,860
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>         47,935,211
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>               3,871,085
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                 3,847,977
<LOANS>                            188,356,105
<ALLOWANCE>                            961,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     257,843,886
<DEPOSITS>                         203,192,321
<SHORT-TERM>                        37,165,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                  1,209,877
<LONG-TERM>                            899,204
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                15,973
<OTHER-SE>                          15,361,511
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>      15,377,484
<INTEREST-LOAN>                      3,578,171
<INTEREST-INVEST>                      814,156
<INTEREST-OTHER>                            97
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                     4,392,424
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                   1,610,350
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   2,153,531
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                2,238,893
<LOAN-LOSSES>                           45,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                      1,974,521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        659,073
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>             659,073
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                           435,992
<EPS-BASIC>                                .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .28
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                            3.80
<LOANS-NON>                          1,134,032
<LOANS-PAST>                                 0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                     1,014,522
<CHARGE-OFFS>                          108,559
<RECOVERIES>                            10,248
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                      961,211
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                   231,789
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                          0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                729,422



</TABLE>
11923.

#### Sorrells *v.*Southern States Portland Cement Co.

Decided January 28, 1921.

Action for damages; from city court of Polk county — Judge Nunnally presiding. October 8, 1920.

*Max Meyerhardt,*for plaintiff.

*E. 8. Ault,*for defendant.

Luke, J.

The plaintiff, in recommencing his suit which had been previously nonsuited, failed to comply either with section 5625 of the Civil Code (1910) as to payment of costs, or with section 5026, his affidavit in forma pauperis failing to state that “he is advised that he has good cause for recommencing his suit.” It was not error for the court to dismiss the petition on demurrer.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1812 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to reform the 

contribution system of the Universal Service Fund, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2023 

Mr. NEGUSE (for himself, Mrs. FLETCHER, Ms. CRAIG, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Mr. GROTHMAN, and Mr. GALLAGHER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to reform the contribution system of the Universal Service 

Fund, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reforming Broadband 

5 Connectivity Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT. 

7 Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment 

8 of this Act, the Federal Communications Commission (re9 ferred to in this Act as the ‘‘Commission’’) shall— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1812 IH

1 (1) conduct a study assessing the need to ex2 pand the contribution base of the Universal Service 

3 Fund to ensure that the contribution requirement 

4 under section 254(d) of the Communications Act of 

5 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254(d)) is imposed fairly and equi6 tably; and 

7 (2) submit to Congress a report on the results 

8 of the study conducted under paragraph (1). 

9 SEC. 3. UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND CONTRIBUTION SYSTEM 

10 REFORM. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

12 date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall com13 plete a rulemaking to reform the contribution system of 

14 the Universal Service Fund, including by expanding the 

15 contribution base of the Universal Service Fund. 

16 (b) CONSIDERATIONS.—In conducting the rule17 making required under subsection (a), the Commission 

18 shall consider— 

19 (1) the relative equities and burdens of the pro20 posed changes to the contribution system of the Uni21 versal Service Fund with respect to consumers and 

22 businesses; 

23 (2) the impact of the proposed changes to the 

24 contribution system of the Universal Service Fund 

25 on seniors; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 1812 IH

1 (3) the findings and recommendations in the re2 port submitted under section 2(2). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
03

- 13

- 00509

- CR

IN THE

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS

THIRD DISTRICT, OF AUSTIN

TERRY ATKINS

Petitione r

,

V

.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Responden t

.

MOTION FOR EX TENSION OF TIME

TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

TO THE HONORABLE TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT

AUSTIN:

Petitioner files this M o tion for Extension of Time to File Motion for

Rehearing under Fed. R. App. P. 40(a)(1). In support of this motion, P etitioner

shows the following:

1

. The C ourt of Appeals for the Third District of Texas in Austin rendered

its opin i on and j udg m ent in Terry Atkins v. The State of Texas

, No. 03

- 13

- 00509

-

CR, on July 24, 2015.

2. Petitioner requests an e xtension of time for a rehearing. The deadline

for filing a Petition for Rehearing on the above styled case was August 6, 2015.

This is Petitioner’s request for an e x tension of 30 days in this case.

3. Petitioner relies on the following facts as a reasonable explanatio n for th e

requested extension of time to have a rehearing on the opinion and judgment; ACCEPTED

03-13-00509-CR

6615647

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

8/24/2015 10:09:27 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKPetitioner’s c ounsel needs more time to research the points of law and facts

that the panel overlooked or misapprehended the pivotal effect of a new

precedential decision and statute and the issue of exceptional importance that calls

out for en banc attention.

4. The undersigned h a s conferred with opposing counsel, Kathryn Scales,

who indi c ated there was no opposition to this request.

Therefore, Petitioner prays that this Court grant this Motion for Extension of

Time on Filing the Motion for Rehearing.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Amber Vazquez Bode

Amber Vazquez Bode

SBN: 24039225

1004 West Ave.

Austin, Texas 78701

512

- 220

- 8507

512

- 480

- 0760

amberv@lawyers.com

C ERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

As requir e d by Tex. R. A pp. P. 10

. 1(a)(5), I certify that I h a ve conferred with

Kathryn Scales, Assistant District Attorney who has indicated that this motion is

unopposed, and Lisa McMinn, State Prosecuting Attorney who counsel has

contacted but is pending response.

/s/Amber Vazquez Bode

Amber Vazquez BodeC ERTIFICATE OF

SERVICE

I certify that, on August 21, 2015, I served a copy of this m o tion by

electronic filing and First Class, United States mail on the following:

The Honorable Lisa C. McMinn

State Prosecuting Attorney

P.O. Box 13046

Austin, TX 78711

The Honorable Velva L. Price

Criminal District Clerk

P.O. BOX 1748

Austin, TX 78767

Ms. Kathryn A. Scales

Assistant District Attorney

PO Box 1748

Austin, TX 78767

- 1748

/s/ Amber Vazquez Bode

Amber Vazquez Bode
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, B. Michael Adler, President and Chief Executive Officer of WQN, Inc. certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of WQN, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;and  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  c.  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
       Date: March 31, 2005      By: /s/ B. Michael Adler           B. Michael Adler
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6566

JAMES ANTHONY BARNETT, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. SHERIFF SAMUEL W. PAGE; NURSE JENNY THOMAS , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Loretta C. Biggs , District Judge. ( 1:15

- cv
- 01064

- LCB

- JLW )

Submitted : August 16, 2018 Decided: August 21, 2018

Before WYNN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
James Anthony Barnett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Torin L. Fury, William L. Hill, FRAZIER HILL & FURY, RLLP, Greensboro, North Carolina; Jay C. Salsman, HARRIS, CREECH, WARD & BLACKERBY, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Anthony Barnett, Jr., app eals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint. T he district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012)

. The magistrate judge recommended
that relief be denied and advised B arnett that failure to file timely objections to this
recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the
recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1985) ; see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985)

. B arnett
has waived appellate revie w by failing to timely file objections after receiving proper
notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                5


<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                   492,000
<SECURITIES>                             2,975,000
<RECEIVABLES>                            987,000
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                              162,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         4,763,000
<PP&E>                                   137,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           13,256,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    7,231,000
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                                 18,000
<OTHER-SE>                               2,270,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             13,256,000
<SALES>                                  1,963,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,963,000
<CGS>                                    1,528,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            692,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         1,997,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       96,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (2,093,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (2,093,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                             (2,093,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                              (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (.15)



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTINE J. WILLIAMS, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION 14-594-CG-M

 )

POARCH BAND OF CREEK )

INDIANS, )

 )

Defendant. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo

determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is 

made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that Defendant Poarch Band of Creek Indians’ 

Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is GRANTED and 

Plaintiff Christine J. Williams’ Complaint is DISMISSED.

DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of July, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00594-CG-M Document 28 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 1
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WARREN EMANUEL GEORGES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-2016

[April 29, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; William L. Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2013CF000588A.

Warren Emanuel Georges, Raiford, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAVID ALAN COKER, :

AIS 244873,

:

Petitioner,

:

vs. CA 09-0766-CG-C

:

BILLY MITCHEM,

:

Respondent.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the

issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the supplemental recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated March 11, 2010 is ADOPTED

as the opinion of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED this 12th day of April, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00766-CG-C Document 9 Filed 04/12/10 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                                   SARBANES -
                                OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of American Oriental
Bioengineering, Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")
on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:

         1.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the SEC or
its staff upon request.



/s/ Shujun Liu
--------------------------------------------
Name: Shujun Liu
Title:  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
April 14, 2005




This Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This exhibit is not "filed" for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided
by applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1921 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1921

  To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Library of 
   Congress, John C. Stennis Center for Public Service Training and 
                   Development for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Library of 
   Congress, John C. Stennis Center for Public Service Training and 
                   Development for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, 
              JOHN C. STENNIS CENTER FOR PUBLIC SERVICE TRAINING AND 
              DEVELOPMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Library of Congress, John 
C. Stennis Center for Public Service Training and Development for 
fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $430,000.
                                 <all>
```
```

                PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Provident  Financial Group, Inc.  ("Provident") on Form 10-Q
for the period ending June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Hoverson, Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of Provident,  certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

   (1)The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Provident.

/s/ Robert L. Hoverson
----------------------
Robert L. Hoverson
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

August 14, 2003

[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Provident  Financial  Group,  Inc. and will be retained by Provident
Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.]
```
----

|   | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2009, (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Paul O. Koether     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Paul O. Koether         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                    |   |
|                    |   |
| /s/ Bryan P. Healey     |   |
| Bryan P. Healey         |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

----