alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 245 (Monday, December 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76329-76330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29894]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 16, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Yvonne Sparks, Community 
Development Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Alliance Bancshares, Inc., Cape Girardeau, Missouri; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of Tammcorp, Inc., Tamms, Illinois, 
and thereby indirectly acquire Capaha Bank SB, Tamms, Illinois.
    In connection with this application; Tammcorp Acquisition 
Corporation, Cape Girardeau, Missouri; to become a bank holding company 
by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Tammcorp, Inc., Tamms, 
Illinois, and thereby indirectly acquiring Capaha Bank SB, Tamms, 
Illinois.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacquelyn K. Brunmeier, 
Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Dutton Bancorporation, Inc., Dutton, Montana; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of W.C. Edwards

[[Page 76330]]

Holding Company, Denton, Montana, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Farmers State Bank, Denton, Montana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 17, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-29894 Filed 12-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1973 

To provide for a limitation on availability of Department of Health and 

Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Buildings 

and Facilities for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of Department 

of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Buildings and Facilities for fiscal 

year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1973 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF DEPART2 MENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 

3 CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PRE4 VENTION BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES FOR 

5 FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Department of Health and Human Services, Cen9 ters for Disease Control and Prevention Buildings and Fa10 cilities for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $30,000,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. ("CRM")
on Form 10-QSB for the six months ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerome
S. Flum, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                              By: /s/ Jerome S. Flum
                                                      Jerome S. Flum
                                                      Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2003
#### Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Defendant-Appellee. Arthur O. Armstrong, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William L. Osteen, Defendant-Appellee. Arthur O. Armstrong, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William L. Osteen; Herbert J. Hutton, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 01-1306, 01-1307, 01-1310.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 2001.

Decided June 6, 2001.

Arthur O. Armstrong, pro se.

Before DIANAN GRIBBON MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals a district court order denying his motions for leave to file complaints. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and find no revers*240ible error. Accordingly, we deny Armstrong’s motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for summary judgment and dismiss the appeals as frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
11604.

#### Phaul *v.*Macon Railway and Light Company.

Bloodworth, J.

1. When considered in the light of the pleadings, the facts of the case, the entire charge, and the qualifying note of the judge to certain grounds of the amendment to the motion for new trial, no error *172requiring tlie grant of a new trial is shown in any of the grounds which complain of errors made by the judge in charging the jury.

Decided January 25, 1921.

Action for damages; from city court of Macon — Judge Guerry. May 20, 1920.

-Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

Harris, *Harris &*Wiiman, *J. E. Hall,*for plaintiff.

*Ellis &*Glawson, for defendant.

2. While the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error contained a bare reference to grounds 16 and 17 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial which allege that the judge erred in refusing certain written requests to charge, these grounds were not argued in the brief. The statement in the ■ brief of counsel, *“*We insist upan all the grounds of our motion for new trial. We have endeavored to argue each of them as briefly as possible. The exceptions are.full and specific, arid we respectfully request the court’s careful consideration of them,” does not amount to an argument. *Cheek*v. *State,*22 *Ga. App.*788 (5) (97 S. E. 203); *Rounsaville*v. *Camp,*19 *Ga. App.*336(4) (91 S. E. 446), and cases cited.

3. The jury having passed upon the facts of this ease, the trial judge' having approved their verdict, which was authorized by the evidence, and this court finding no reversible error in the trial, the judgment is

*AfJU-med.*

*Broyles, G. J., and Luhe, J., concur.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

ANTRON MONYA VALRIE, : 

 Petitioner, : 

vs. : CRIMINAL NO. 08-0214-CG-M 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-0824-CG 

 Respondent. : 

ORDER

 After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the 

issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated June 9, 2010, is ADOPTED as the 

opinion of this Court. 

DONE and ORDERED this 28th day of July, 2010. 

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:08-cr-00214-CG-M Document 37 Filed 07/28/10 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JANICE B. JONES, :

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : CIVIL ACTION 14-00469-KD-B

:

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of :

Social Security, :

Defendant. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no 

objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(l)(B) and dated April 1, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, 

it is ORDERED that Defendant’s unopposed Motion to Remand (Doc. 10) is GRANTED, and 

that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff benefits is 

REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Melkonyan v. 

Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991), for further administrative proceedings. 

The remand pursuant to sentence four of Section 405(g) makes Plaintiff a prevailing 

party for purposes of the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 

U.S. 292 (1993), and terminates this Court’s jurisdiction over this matter.

DONE and ORDERED this the 17th day of April 2015.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:14-cv-00469-KD-B Document 12 Filed 04/17/15 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-30-1999
<CASH>                                             180,579
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      790,040
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (40,000)
<INVENTORY>                                         90,275
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,072,943
<PP&E>                                             959,274
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (812,767)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,782,452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,144,901
<BONDS>                                          2,308,664
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           498,827
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2,169,940)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,782,452
<SALES>                                          1,005,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,005,014
<CGS>                                              588,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   446,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (52,373)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (82,368)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (82,368)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (82,368)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.02)
        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1946 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Labor, 

Departmental Management, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Labor, Departmental Management, Salaries 

and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DEPARTMENTAL 

5 MANAGEMENT, SALARIES AND EXPENSES 

6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Department of Labor, Departmental ManageVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:15 Apr 14, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1946.IH H1946

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1946 IH

1 ment, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may not 

2 exceed $337,756,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### In the Matter of Francisco Sagardia, Petitioner, v P. Chappius Jr., as Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

[975 NYS2d 699]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with smuggling after a nurse observed him pretend to swallow his medication and begin to walk away with the medication in the bottom of his juice cup. When the nurse questioned petitioner as to what was in his cup, petitioner quickly brought the cup back up to his mouth and swallowed the medication. Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty as charged, and this determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Initially, inasmuch as a substantial evidence question was raised in the petition and there were no “other objections as could terminate the proceeding . . . without reaching the substantial evidence issue” (CPLR 7804 [g]), this proceeding was properly transferred to this Court *(see Matter of Abreu v Bezio,*78 AD3d 1341, 1341 [2010]). Turning to the merits, the misbehavior report and hearing testimony provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Cruz v Walsh,*87 AD3d 1234, 1234-1235 [2011]; *Matter of English v Fischer,*55 AD3d 1206, 1206 [2008]). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the Hearing Officer could reasonably infer from the evidence that petitioner intended to take the medication out of the area. Moreover, petitioner’s denial of the charge and identification of alleged inconsistencies in witness testimony presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see Matter of Bethune v Fischer,*108 AD3d 966, 967 [2013], *lv denied*22 NY3d 855 [2013]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit.

Peters, PJ., Lahtinen, Spain and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Exhibit 10.19





[English Summary]





Yunding Park Cooperative Development Agreement





Party A: Yongtai County Government


Party B: Hong Kong Yida International Investment Co., Ltd.





Exclusivity:


Party B has the exclusive right to develop both Yongtai Beixi and Jiezhukou Lake and Party A is prohibited from granting the right of development, operation and management to any third party during the term of the Agreement.





Term:


Party B shall be entitled to the operation and management rights of Yunding Park for a period of 40 years from the date of execution of this Agreement.





Rights and Responsibilities:


Party A is entitled to resource sharing fees from Party B as to its tourism activities;


Party A shall not grant the right of development, operation and management to any third party during the term of the Agreement;


Party A shall not terminate the Agreement during the term unless required by laws and policies of the government;


Party B is entitled to the rights to develop and operate the resource;


Party B shall pay to Party A certain resource sharing fees;


Party B can mortgage or pledge the rights under this Agreement;


Party B can obtain the land use rights through bidding and auction according to certain laws;





Revenue Sharing:


Under the Agreement, Party B is entitled to: (1) the ticket sales revenue minus a total of 5 million RMB to be paid to Party A over the course of the first 10 years of the Agreement; (2) the earnings excluding 5% of the actual ticket sales during that time in the second ten years; (3) the earnings excluding 6% of the actual ticket sales during that time in the third ten years and (4) the earnings excluding 7% of the actual ticket sales during that time in the fourth ten years.





Resource Sharing Fees:


Party B shall also pay to Party A resource sharing fees as to the franchise projects: (1) not less than 3% of the actual revenue from franchise projects during the first ten years; (2) not less than 4% of the actual revenue from franchise projects during the second ten years; and (3) not less than 5% of the actual revenue from franchise projects thereafter.





Assignment:


Party B will incorporate a new company to develop Yunding Park. Such new company shall assume all the rights and liabilities of Party B.





Dispute:


If there is any dispute between the parties, both parties shall resolve the dispute through compromise settlement. If the parties cannot reach the settlement, then either party can resolve the dispute by the municipal court of Yongtai County or intermediate court of Fuzhou City.





Jurisdiction:


Law of China





Date of the Agreement:


November 27, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended November 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kevin M. McMullenKevin M. McMullenChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President




/s/ Michael E. HicksMichael E. HicksSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Treasurer


Date: March 23, 2007

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1808 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit discrimination in the 

Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2023 

Ms. JACOBS (for herself, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. NORTON, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Mr. JOHNSON of 

Georgia, Mr. NADLER, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. POCAN, Mr. PAYNE, Ms. 

ESCOBAR, Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI, Mr. CICILLINE, Ms. GARCIA of Texas, 

Ms. TOKUDA, Mr. VEASEY, Ms. BONAMICI, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. SHERMAN, and Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit 

discrimination in the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Military 

5 Readiness Not Discrimination Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1808 IH

1 SEC. 2. NONDISCRIMINATION WITH RESPECT TO SERVICE 

2 IN THE ARMED FORCES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 37 of title 10, United 

4 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 651 the 

5 following new section: 

6 ‘‘§ 651a. Members: prohibition of gender discrimina7 tion 

8 ‘‘(a) STANDARDS FOR ELIGIBILITY FOR SERVICE.— 

9 Any qualifications established or applied for eligibility for 

10 service in an Armed Force shall take into account only 

11 the ability of an individual to meet occupational standards 

12 for military service generally and the military occupational 

13 specialty concerned in particular, and may not include any 

14 criteria relating to the race, color, national origin, religion, 

15 or sex (including gender identity, sexual orientation, or sex 

16 characteristics (including intersex traits)) of an individual. 

17 ‘‘(b) EQUALITY OF TREATMENT AND OPPORTUNITY

18 IN SERVICE.—Any personnel policy developed or imple19 mented by the Secretary concerned with respect to mem20 bers of the Armed Forces shall ensure equality of treat21 ment and opportunity for all persons in the Armed Forces, 

22 without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, and 

23 sex (including gender identity, sexual orientation, or sex 

24 characteristics (including intersex traits)).’’. 

25 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

26 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 1808 IH

1 after the item relating to section 651 the following new 

2 item: 

‘‘651a. Members: prohibition of gender discrimination.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB