alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1844 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1844

   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, 
                Expense Allowances for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, 
                Expense Allowances for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR SENATE, EXPENSE 
              ALLOWANCES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Senate, Expense 
Allowances for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $217,980.
                                 <all>
```
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 1 2

- 00 69 1

- CR

OSMIN PERAZA , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
Appeal from the 184 th District Court of Harris County

.

(Tr. Ct. No. 130543 9 ).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on July 16 , 2012. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court
holds there is error in that portion of the trial court ’s judgment which assess es as court costs a $50.00 charge for “serving capias” and a $250.00 “DNA Record Fee.” Accordingly, the Court modifies the referenced portion of the trial court’s judgment to reduce the total amount of court costs for which appella nt is financially responsible to $334.00.

The Court further holds that there was no reversible error in the remaining portions of the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment as herein modified

.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered December 30 , 2014.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp , and Brown

. Opinion delivered by Justice Jennings. Justice Brown, concurring and dissenting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     INTERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
     ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     170,898

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         170,898
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  437,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    63,633
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               719,360
<PP&E>                                         6,361,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,675,674)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,234,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,120,575
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       70,371
<OTHER-SE>                                     425,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,234,782
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,005,671
<CGS>                                          637,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  439,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             78,834
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (150,906)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (150,906)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (150,906)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Maureen D. Howley, Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing
Owner), of World Monitor Trust II  Series D (Series D), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Ds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series D.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Maureen D. Howley                          
|Maureen D. Howley                              
|Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President
|March 30, 2005
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00257-CR

MICHAEL GENTLE,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 52nd District Court

Coryell County, Texas

Trial Court No. FAM-08-19640

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). 

We have not issued a decision in this appeal, and Appellant personally signed the 

motion. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice
Gentle v. State Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed August 2, 2012

Do not publish

[CR25]
EXHIBIT 32 (a)

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Enzo  Biochem,  Inc.,  and
Subsidiaries  ("the Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2005
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Elazar Rabbani,  Ph.D.,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

              (1)    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


              (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



         /s/  Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.




         Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.
         Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DANA YOUNG,

Petitioner

v.

GLOBAL TEL LINK,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 117 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of August, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
11683.

#### James *v.*The State.

Broyles, C. J.

The charge of the court fully and fairly presented, with one exception, the law governing the substantial and controlling issues of the case, including the defendant’s contentions; the error being that the court, in charging upon the subject of assault with intent to murder, stated, in substance, that all the rules applicable in a case *750of murder, except the fact of the killing, apply to a case of an assault with intent to murder, whereas there is another vital exception: In a murder case, under certain circumstances, the law presumes malice or the intent to kill on the part of the slayer, while in a case of assault with intent to murder, where death does not result, there is no such presumption, but it is incumbent upon the State to show by the evidence a specific intent to kill. This error, however, was harmless, since the defendant was convicted not of the offense of assault with intent to murder, but merely of shooting at another. The motion for a new trial does not point out any error that would warrant this court in sotting aside the verdict, which is amply supported by the evidence and approved by the trial judge.

Decided November 9, 1920.

Conviction of shooting at another; from Douglas superior court — Judge Irwin. June 4, 1920.

Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

*J. S. James, M. J. Head, J. H. McLarty, J. S. Edwards, W. A. James,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. R. Hutcheson, solicitor-general,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         538,985
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,630
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     42,093
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               607,557
<PP&E>                                       5,963,737
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,063,793
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,562,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          252,108
<BONDS>                                      1,662,539
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,648,345
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,562,992
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,356,305
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  394,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               446,226
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,708
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                452,655
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            452,655
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   452,655
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    64.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    64.13
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:05-cv-00427-LS-C Document 22 Filed 01/26/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:05-cv-00427-LS-C Document 22 Filed 01/26/06 Page 2 of 2
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1044 

CA 12-00563 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

LORI HOOVER AND JESSICA BOWERS, 

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, 

V ORDER

NEW HOLLAND NORTH AMERICA, INC., FORMERLY 

KNOWN AS FORD NEW HOLLAND, INC., CASE NEW 

HOLLAND, INC., NIAGARA FRONTIER EQUIPMENT 

SALES, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS NIAGARA 

FORD NEW HOLLAND, INC., 

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, 

ET AL., DEFENDANTS. 

----------------------------------------- 

CNH AMERICA LLC, THIRD-PARTY 

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, 

V

 

KYLE P. ANDREWS, TREASURER OF NIAGARA 

COUNTY, AS TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATOR FOR 

THE ESTATE OF GARY HOOVER, DECEASED, 

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP, BUFFALO (PAUL F. JONES OF COUNSEL), AND NIXON

PEABODY LLP, FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFAPPELLANT.

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN A. COLLINS OF COUNSEL),

FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County

(Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered September 30, 2011. The order,

inter alia, denied in part the posttrial motions of the parties. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens,

155 AD2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]). 

Entered: November 16, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

FRANK JAMES ABSTON, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION 14-0505-CG-M

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CRIMINAL NO 11-00238-CG-M

)

Respondent. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo

determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, 

the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) 

is adopted as the opinion of this Court with the following additional comments.

Petitioner’s Objection to the Report and Recommendation focuses on his 

insistence that the Magistrate Judge failed to address his argument that his 

counsel was ineffective for not informing him of the filing of the § 851 enhancement 

prior to his entry of his guilty plea. However, even if that is true, the record in this 

case establishes that petitioner was not prejudiced by any such alleged failure 

because the Court clearly informed him during the plea colloquy that the sentence 

he faced was a mandatory life sentence.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate (Doc. 178) is

DENIED and that this action is hereby DISMISSED. It is further ORDERED

that any certificate of appealability filed by Petitioner be DENIED as he is not 

Case 1:11-cr-00238-CG-C Document 204 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

<pageID>
2

entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.

DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of June, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cr-00238-CG-C Document 204 Filed 06/08/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

<pageID>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1857 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Office of 

the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Office of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper 

for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 SENATE, OFFICE OF THE SERGEANT AT ARMS 

5 AND DOORKEEPER FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:38 Apr 13, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1857.IH H1857

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1857 IH

1 able for Senate, Office of the Sergeant at Arms and Door2 keeper for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $84,157,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        11,666,500
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      64,000
<MORTGAGE>                                   2,107,200
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   52,500
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              14,883,900
<CASH>                                          36,500
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             371,400
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       1,169,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,744,900
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             13,429,500
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 402,300
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          309,800
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                367,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          242,200
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           900
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,301,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,744,900
<PREMIUMS>                                     740,800
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            826,000
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              18,500
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 535,000
<BENEFITS>                                   1,138,300
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     80,200
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           465,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                335,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                   119,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            206,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (3,400)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   202,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.18
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 12.2
 Doral Financial Corporation
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
 For the six month period endedJune
30, 2010Including Interest on DepositsEarnings (Losses):Pre-tax loss from continuing operations
    
    $
    (229,798
    )Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    127,606Total Earnings (Losses)
    
    $
    (102,192
    )Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    126,392Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    87An estimate of the interest component within rental expense
    
    
    1,127Total Fixed Charges before preferred dividends
    
    
    127,606Preferred
dividends
    
    
    4,279Ratio of pre tax loss to net loss
    
    
    0.97Preferred dividend factor
    
    
    4,151Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    131,757Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
    
    
    (A
    )Excluding Interest on DepositsEarnings (Losses):Pre-tax loss from continuing operations
    
    $
    (229,798
    )Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    73,319Total Earnings (Losses)
    
    $
    (156,479
    )Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    72,105Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    87An estimate of the interest component within rental expense
    
    
    1,127Total Fixed Charges before preferred dividends
    
    
    73,319Preferred dividends
    
    
    4,279Ratio of pre tax loss to net loss
    
    
    0.97Preferred dividend factor
    
    
    4,151Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    77,471Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
    
    
    (A
    )
 
 (A)
    
    Due to the Companys pre-tax loss for the six month
period ended June 30, 2010 the ratio
coverage was less than 1:1. The Company would have to generate additional earnings of $233.9
million to achieve a ratio of 1:1 during the first half of 2010.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of FieldPoint Petroleum Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ray Reaves, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  _/s/ Ray Reaves_____ Ray Reaves Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer November 16, 2009