alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000316297
<NAME> SUPER 8 MOTELS NORTHWEST 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         354,338
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,241
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     43,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               426,733
<PP&E>                                       5,972,991
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,125,856
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,290,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          301,236
<BONDS>                                      1,143,266
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,846,341
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,290,843
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               624,086
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  282,819
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               206,696
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                101,010
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            101,010
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   101,010
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    16.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    16.84
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
10.63


 


FOURTH
ALLONGE TO


8%
SUBORDINATED NOTE


 


This
Fourth Allonge (the “Fourth Allonge”), dated as of May 27, 2015, is attached to and forms a part of an 8% Subordinated
Note, dated May 31, 2011 (collectively, the “Note”), made by Digital Ally, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”), payable to the order of ________________(the “Holder”) in the original principal amount
of $1,500,000. The Note was amended by an Allonge, dated November 7, 2011, a Second Allonge, dated July 24, 2012, and a
Third Allonge dated December 4, 2013. This Fourth Allonge amends the Note and the Third Allonge.


 


1.
Paragraph 3 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


Maturity
Date and Pre-Payments. This Note shall be due and payable in full, including all accrued Interest thereon, on July 15, 2015
(the “Maturity Date”). At any time prior to the Maturity Date, the Company shall have the right to prepay this Note,
in whole or in part, without penalty. The Company will give to Holder ten (10) days’ written notice of its intent to prepay
this Note. On such prepayment date, the Company will pay in respect of this Note in cash the principal amount being prepaid plus
accrued Interest.


 


In
all other respects, the Note and the Allonge are confirmed, ratified, and approved and, as amended by this Second Allonge, shall
continue in full force and effect.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Holder have caused this Fourth Allonge to be executed and delivered as of the date and year
first above written.


 


	 	DIGITAL
    ALLY, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Stanton
    E. Ross
	 	 	Stanton E. Ross
	 	Its: 	Chairman, President
    and CEO
	 	 
	 	THE
    HOLDER:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KURT TAYLOR, :

 :

Plaintiff, :

 :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 05-0691-BH-M

 :

COI J. JOHNSON, et al., :

 :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this

file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no

objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion

of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby

DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to obey

the Court's Order.

DONE this 7th day of August, 2006.

s/ W. B. Hand

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00691-BH-M Document 11 Filed 08/07/06 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 12.2
  Doral
    Financial Corporation
    Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred
    Stock Dividends
  For the nine month period endedSeptember 30, 2007Including Interest on DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax loss from continuing operations

$
(216,244
)Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)


335,018Total Earnings

$
118,774Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized

$
332,562Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized expenses related
    to indebtedness


562An estimate of the interest component within rental expense


1,894Total Fixed Charges before preferred dividends


335,018Preferred dividends


(24,974
)Ratio of pre tax income to net income


1.579Preferred dividend factor


(39,434
)Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends


295,584Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock
    Dividends


(A
)Excluding Interest on DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax loss from continuing operations

$
(216,244
)Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)


208,978Total Earnings

$
(7,266
)Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized

$
206,522Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized expenses related
    to indebtedness


562An estimate of the interest component within rental expense


1,894Total Fixed Charges before preferred dividends


208,978Preferred dividend factor


(39,434
)Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends

$
169,544Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock
    Dividends


(A
)    (A)
    
    Due to the Companys pre-tax loss the ratio coverage was
    less than 1:1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             433
<SECURITIES>                                       912
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,763
<ALLOWANCES>                                        27
<INVENTORY>                                      3,538
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,364
<PP&E>                                           6,168
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,183
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,596
<BONDS>                                          6,374
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,950
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,182
<SALES>                                          2,716
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,537
<CGS>                                            3,714
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 945
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,284)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        38
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,322)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (93)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,415)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.45)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 197 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 197

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to include store-and-
   forward technologies as telecommunications systems through which 
  telehealth services may be furnished for payment under the Medicare 
                                program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

Mr. Rosendale introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to include store-and-
   forward technologies as telecommunications systems through which 
  telehealth services may be furnished for payment under the Medicare 
                                program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Telehealth Expansion Act''.

SEC. 2. MEDICARE PAYMENT FOR STORE-AND-FORWARD TECHNOLOGIES USED TO 
              FURNISH TELEHEALTH SERVICES.

    Section 1834(m)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395m(m)(1)) is amended by striking ``in the case of any Federal 
telemedicine demonstration program conducted in Alaska or Hawaii,''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40344

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NORMA MONTES, also known as Norma Lizeth Montes,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:15-CR-988-1

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Norma Montes has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Montes has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40344 Document: 00513805034 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
No. 16-40344

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40344 Document: 00513805034 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 16.0


                          [ARTHUR ANDERSEN LETTERHEAD]




November 16, 1998

Mr. Lynn Turner
Office of the Chief Accountant
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Dear Mr. Turner:

We have read paragraph 3 of Item 5 included in the Form 10-Q dated September 
30, 1998, and filed on November 16, 1998, of Intelect Communications, Inc. to 
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are in agreement with 
the statements contained therein.

Very truly yours,

/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions
Corp. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor Trust II  Series E (Series E), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Es Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series E.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer     
|Kenneth A. Shewer         
|Co-Chief Executive Officer
|March 31, 2006
#### Rhodes *v.*Piper.

Supreme *Court.—Rule of*Court.—If rule 19 of the Supreme Court, adopted on the 6th day of March, 1871 (32 Ind.), requiring marginal notes to be placed on the transcript in the appropriate places, be not complied with, the submission of the cause will be set aside.

APPEAL from the Fayette Circuit Court.

Osborn, C. J.

On the 6th of March, 1871, this court adopted a rule, that the appellant should cause his transcript to be paged, and the lines numbered, and also cause marginal notes to be placed on the transcript in their appropriate places, indicating the several parts of the pleadings in the cause, the exhibits, if any, orders of the court, and the bills of exceptions; also, when the evidence is set out by deposition or otherwise, the names of the witnesses. Rule 19, 32 Ind. 10, preceding the table of cases.

*475
      *y. C. McIntosh*and *B. F.*Claypoolfor appellant.

*M. E. Forkner, E. H. Bundy, J. M. Wilson,*and *A. M. Sinks,*for appellee.

It is quite obvious that the purpose of the rule was to enable the court to more readily find any matter or thing sought for in the record. It often happens that we have to make frequent reference to the same thing, and to many things in connection with each other, and the marginal notes, are of great service, and save much time and labor.

In this case the transcript is paged and the lines numbered, but the most important requirement of the rule, making the marginal notes, is entirely omitted. The record was filed on the 22d day of October, 1872.

The practice of the court in such cases has been to set aside the submission of the cause, at the costs of the appellant: Perhaps, if the appellant should refuse to comply with the rule, on a proper application and showing by the appellee, the appeal would be dismissed.

The submission is set aside, at the costs of the appellant.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75231-75232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29549]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[Docket No. FD 35880]


Bogalusa Bayou Railroad, L.L.C.--Acquisition of Trackage Rights 
Exemption Containing Interchange Commitment--Illinois Central Railroad 
Company

    Bogalusa Bayou Railroad, L.L.C. (BBRR),\1\ a noncarrier, has filed 
a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire overhead 
trackage rights over a one-mile rail line owned by Illinois Central 
Railroad Company (IC) extending between milepost 68.85, at Leescreek, 
La., and milepost 69.85, at Bogalusa, La., pursuant to an agreement 
between BBRR and IC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ BBRR is a wholly owned subsidiary of Watco Holdings, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This transaction is related to a concurrently filed verified notice 
of exemption in Watco Holdings, Inc.--Continuance in Control 
Exemption--Bogalusa Bayou Railroad, Docket No. FD 35882, wherein Watco 
Holdings, Inc., seeks Board approval under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2) to 
continue in control of BBRR, upon BBRR's becoming a Class III rail 
carrier.
    BBRR states that the agreement precludes BBRR from interchanging 
traffic with a third party. As required under 49 CFR 1150.33(h)(1), 
BBRR has provided additional information concerning the interchange 
commitment.
    BBRR has certified that its projected annual revenues as a result 
of this transaction will not result in BBRR's becoming a Class II or 
Class I rail carrier and will not exceed $5 million.
    This transaction may be consummated on or after December 31, 2014, 
the effective date of the exemption (30 days after the verified notice 
of exemption was filed).
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the 
exemption. Petitions for stay must be filed no later than December 24, 
2014

[[Page 75232]]

(at least seven days before the exemption becomes effective).
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to Docket No. 
FD 35880 must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one copy of each 
pleading must be served on Karl Morell, Ball Janik LLP, 655 Fifteenth 
Street NW., Suite 225, Washington, DC 20005.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at 
WWW.STB.DOT.GOV

    Decided: December 12, 2014.

    By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Brendetta S. Jones,
Clerk Clearance.
[FR Doc. 2014-29549 Filed 12-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5


<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                41,033
<SECURITIES>                          1,102,000
<RECEIVABLES>                         1,301,239
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           175,431
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      2,857,444
<PP&E>                                443,907
<DEPRECIATION>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        9,716,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 9,654,513
<BONDS>                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                              15,953
<OTHER-SE>                            (3,379,209)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          9,716,257
<SALES>                               3,484,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      3,484,000
<CGS>                                 3,037,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         606,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (159,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (159,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          (159,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.01)



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40490 c/w No. 04-40535 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RAUL ARAGUZ-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-48-ALL USDC No. 1:93-CR-113-2

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Raul Araguz-Ramirez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being found illegally present in the United States after deportation. He argues for the first time on appeal that, pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are elements of the offense, not sentence enhancements, making those provisions unconstitutional. As Araguz concedes, however, this argument is foreclosed byNo. 04-40490 c/w No. 04-40535 -2- Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). Araguz also argues that the Supreme Court’s holding in Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), should be applied to sentences determined under the federal sentencing guidelines. He concedes that this argument is foreclosed by this court’s recent opinion in United States v. Pineiro , 377 F.3d 464, 465-66 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263), but he raises it to preserve it for possible further review. Araguz does not brief any argument concerning how or why any potential reduction in his sentence for the 8 U.S.C. § 1326 conviction would have any bearing on the sentence the district court imposed upon revocation of his supervised release for his prior illegal-reentry conviction. He has therefore abandoned his appeal from the revocation of his supervised release. United States v. Valdiosera-Godinez , 932 F.2d 1093, 1099 (5th Cir. 1991).

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Seaena, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
      for the year end December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin T. Ryan, Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/ Kevin T. Ryan


Kevin
      T.
      Ryan


Chief
      Executive OfficerApril 1, 2008