alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PAPA ROD, INC., et al., :

 :

Plaintiffs, :

 :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-00272-B

 : 

BP, PLC, et al., :

 :

Defendants. : 

ORDER

This action is before the Court on Defendants BP America, Inc.,

BP Products North America, Inc. and BP Exploration and Production,

Inc.’s Motion for Stay of Proceedings Pending Transfer by the

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (Doc. 12). Upon

consideration, the Motion to Stay is DENIED with leave to re-file

after responsive pleadings have been filed. See Burke v. BP

Corporation North America, Inc., et al., No. 10-cv-00195-WS-M (S.D.

Ala. May 25, 2010) (order denying motion for stay (Doc. 41)).

Done this 9th day of June, 2010.

 /s/ Sonja F. Bivins 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00272-B Document 15 Filed 06/09/10 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Crystalix Group International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert McDermott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ ROBERT MCDERMOTT
----------------------------------------
Robert McDermott
Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GEOVERA SPECIALTY INSURANCE )

COMPANY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-376-KD-B

)

RICHARD G. BONDS; )

ZEYNEP BONDS; and MARCIA )

SHEDECK, as Administrator ad litem of )

the Estate of LEE ANTHONY THORNTON, )

)

Defendants )

JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order entered this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and

DECREED that pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, SUMMARY JUDGMENT is rendered in favor of

Plaintiff GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company and against Defendants. 

Accordingly, DECLARATORY JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Plaintiff as 

follows:

a. That Richard and Zeynep Bonds are not entitled to indemnification by GeoVera

Specialty Insurance Company against any claim, judgment, award, verdict or 

settlement in the claim asserted by Marcia Shedeck as Administrator ad litem of 

the Estate of Lee Anthony Thornton. 

b. That GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company owes no duty to defend Richard 

and Zeynep Bonds for the claims alleged in the matter of Marcia Shedeck, as 

Administrator ad litem of the Estate of Lee Anthony Thornton v. Richard G. 

Bonds and Zeynep Bonds filed in the Circuit Court of Baldwin County, Alabama 

(05-CV-2014-900808.00).

DONE and ORDERED this 11th day of June 2015.

s / Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:14-cv-00376-KD-B Document 28 Filed 06/11/15 Page 1 of 1
#### Jahkysa Hamilton et al., Respondents, v Jam Roc Cafe, Inc., Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 734]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), dated August 15, 2005, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action based upon common-law negligence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant failed to establish its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see*CPLR 3212; *Winegrad v New York Univ. Med Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]). Goldstein, J.P., Rivera, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32 Certification of
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 906                    
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

---

# Exhibit 32

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of HCSB Financial Corp. (the Company),
each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:

| | 1. | The annual report of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
               with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
               Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  March 25, 2004 |  | By:   /s/  James R. Clarkson       
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|                      |  | James R. Clarkson                  
|                      |  | President & Chief Executive Officer

|Date:  March 25, 2004 |  | By:   /s/  Michael W. Hambrick
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|                      |  | Michael W. Hambrick           
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Hulsman *v.*The State.

APPEAL from the Marion Criminal Court.

*W. W. Leathers, C. Byjield,*and *D. Howe, for*appellant.

*j. C. Denny,*Attorney General, *R. P. Parker, H. Lee,*and *j. B. Elam,*for the State.

Buskirk, J.

The appellant was indicted and convicted for selling intoxicating liquors on Sunday, and permitting them to be drank upon the premises where sold. This case is in all its legal aspects the same as the case of *Lehritter*v. *The State, ante,*p. 383, and is affirmed upon the ruling in that case.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2051 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Treasury, Department-Wide Systems and Capital Investments Programs for 

fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the 

Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Treasury, Department-Wide Systems and 

Capital Investments Programs for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2051 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, DEPARTMENT3 WIDE SYSTEMS AND CAPITAL INVESTMENTS 

4 PROGRAMS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

6 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail7 able for Department of Treasury, Department-Wide Sys8 tems and Capital Investments Programs for fiscal year 

9 2024 may not exceed $4,000,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.64

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this
Amendment) by and among XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc., XM Satellite Radio Inc. (collectively with XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc., XM), and Gary Parsons (the Employee), is made as of February 27, 2008.

WHEREAS, XM and the Employee are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of August 6, 2004 and amended as of
April 4, 2007 (the Agreement);

WHEREAS, XM and the Employee wish to amend the Agreement as set forth below to extend the
term of the Agreement;

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:



| | 1. | Article 2.1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety to read as follows:
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Term. Subject to the provisions of Article 4 hereof, this Agreement shall be in effect for a term commencing as of the Effective Date and ending
June 30, 2008.



| | 2. | Article 3.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the following as the new last sentence:
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For services rendered by EMPLOYEE pursuant to this Agreement for the period April 1, 2008 through June 30, 2008, EMPLOYEES Base Salary
shall remain at $525,000.



| | 3. | This Amendment shall be governed by, interpreted under and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Virginia.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute the same document.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 5. | Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement is hereby confirmed in all respects.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered as of the date and the year first written above.





---

XM SATELLITE RADIO HOLDINGS INC./s/ Thomas DonohueBy: Title:




XM SATELLITE RADIO INC./s/ Thomas DonohueBy: Title:




EMPLOYEE/s/ Gary ParsonsGary Parsons
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 

AMENDMENT No. 1 
 to the

 PORTER BANCORP, INC. 

TAX BENEFITS PRESERVATION PLAN 

This is Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) dated as of August 5, 2015, to the TAX BENEFITS PRESERVATION PLAN
dated as of June 25, 2015 (the “Plan”), between Porter Bancorp, Inc., a Kentucky corporation (the “Company”), and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as Rights Agent (the “Rights
Agent”). 
 The definition of “Expiration Date” in Section 1 of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its
entirety as so amended as follows: 
 “Expiration Date” means the earliest of (i) the Final
Expiration Date, (ii) the time at which all Rights are redeemed as provided in Section 19 or exchanged as provided in Section 20, (iii) the first day of a taxable year of the Company as to which the Board of Directors determines that no Tax Benefits
may be carried forward, (iv) a date prior to a Stock Acquisition Date on which the Board of Directors determines that a limitation on the use of the Tax Benefits under Section 382 would no longer be material to the Company, and (v) the repeal or
amendment of Section 382 or any successor statute, if the Board of Directors determines that this Plan is no longer necessary for the preservation of Tax Benefits. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1 to the Plan to be duly executed by their respective
authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. 
 PORTER BANCORP, INC. 

By: /s/ Phillip W. Barnhouse 

Name: Phillip W. Barnhouse 

Title: Chief Financial Officer 

American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, 

as Rights Agent 

By: /s/ Jennifer Donovan 

Name: Jennifer Donovan 

Title: Senior Vice President
12093.

#### BRYANT *v.*THE STATE.

Whether there was sufficient corroboration of the defendant’s confession, that on a certain day he took certain whisky to the home of his sister and left it there, was a question for the jury, where there was proof that on that day “ three gallons of stump rum whisky ” were found at that place.

Decided April 13, 1921.

Accusation of possessing liquor; from city court of Macon — Judge Gunn. January 7, 1921.

*H. F. Rawls,*for plaintiff in error.

*Roy W. Moore, solicitor,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

The accusation in this case charged that the accused “ did unlawfully have, control, possess, and have in possession alcohol, alcoholic liquors, spirituous liquors, mixed liquors, whisky, brandy, wine, rum and gin.” Upon the trial a confession of guilt was clearly shown. In this confession the defendant stated that he had brought certain whisky from Jones county on the morning of January 7th and left it at the home of his sister. The confession was corroborated by proof that on that date the officers found at the home of the defendant’s sister, on Hall street in East Macon, “three gallons of stump rum whisky.” “Proof of the corpus delicti may be sufficient corroboration of a confession of guilt to sustain a verdict of guilty.” *Davis*v. *State,*105 *Ga.*808 (3) (32 S. E. 158); *Allen*v. *State,*8 *Ga. App.*90 (68 S. E. 558). “While a conviction based upon an uncorroborated confession cannot be sustained, the sufficiency of the circumstances adduced for the purpose of corroboration is to be determined by the jury.” *Cook*v. *State,*9 *Ga. App.*208(3) (70 S.E. 1019).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

              Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
                   18 U.S.C.Section 1350 adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     I, Peter A. Forman, Chief Executive Officer of Register.com, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.(Section)1350 adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (i) The Company's accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                             /s/ Peter A. Forman
                                             -------------------
                                             Peter A. Forman
                                             Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  March 11, 2004
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 SYMBION, INC.
                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Symbion, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard E.
Francis, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: March 28, 2005

                                           /s/ Richard E. Francis, Jr.
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Richard E. Francis, Jr.
                                           Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                           Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DANIEL JOSEPH PREZIOSI,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 60 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of June, 2017, the Application to File Allowance of 

Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1875 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of 

Representatives, Democratic Caucus for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House 

of Representatives, Democratic Caucus for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, DEMOCRATIC 

5 CAUCUS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for House of Representatives, Democratic Caucus for 

9 fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $1,776,495. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
11256, 11257.

#### Souerbry *v.*Orrell; and *vice versa.*

Decided March 4, 1921.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior eohirt — Judge Pendleton. November 26, 1919.

*Weltner & Cheatham,*for Souerbry.

*T. B.*Higdon, contra.

Stephens, J.

1. “A writ of certiorari in a civil case, unless sued out in forma pauperis, is absolutely void if it be issued before the applicant has given the bond prescribed by law; and the bond, to be effectual, must be approved by the judge or justice of the court in which the case was originally tried. A certificate of the trial magistrate that the plaintiff ‘lias paid all costs accrued in the trial and given bond as required by law in said case’ is not a sufficient substitute for the written approval required bylaw.” *Sanford v. Wade,*17 *Ga. App.*366 (86 S. E. 945).

2. Inasmuch as the judgment in the present case, refusing to dismiss the certiorari, complained of in the cross bill of exceptions, must be reversed, the subsequent hearing was nugatory, and a writ of error to the overruling of the certiorari will be dismissed. *Alabama Midland Ry. Co.*v. *Stevens,*116 *Ga.*790(4) (43 S. E. 46).

*Judgment reversed on cross-bill of exceptions; main bill of exceptions dismissed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Hill, J., concur.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WHITNEY BANK, a Mississippi 

state chartered bank,

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiffs,

vs. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0002-CG-M

PULLUM-CECILIO, LLC., et al.,

Defendants.

JUDGMENT 

In accordance with the separate Order entered on this date in the abovestyled case, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that JUDGMENT

be, and the same hereby is, entered in favor of plaintiff, Whitney Bank, and 

against defendants, Bart Pullum, Rebecca Pullum and Shan Cecilio, jointly and 

severally, in the total amount of $916,840.20. Post-judgment interest will accrue 

at the statutory rate of 0.28%.

DONE and ORDERED, this the 15th day of June, 2015. 

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00002-CG-M Document 26 Filed 06/15/15 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Alan B. LevanName:
    
    Alan B. LevanTitle:
    
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    November 9, 2006
 112
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CURTIS L. DAILEY, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CA 15-0166-C

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, :

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

:

Defendant.

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on this date, it 

is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the decision of the 

Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff benefits be affirmed. 

DONE this the 18th day of April, 2016.

 s/WILLIAM E. CASSADY 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00166-C Document 25 Filed 04/18/16 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32


                                  CERTIFICATION


      Pursuant   to  Section  906  of  the   Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002  (18
U.S.C.ss.1350,  as adopted),  Benton H Wilcoxon,  Chief  Executive  Officer and
Chief Financial  Officer of Composite  Technology  Corporation  (the "Company"),
hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December
31, 2003, to which this  Certification  is attached as Exhibit 32 (the "PERIODIC
REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The  information  contained in the Periodic  Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

      IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned  has set his hand  hereto as of the
20th, day of February, 2004.



                                             /s/ Benton H Wilcoxon
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Benton H Wilcoxon
                                             Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5


<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                             41,033
<SECURITIES>                       345,000
<RECEIVABLES>                      512,075
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        173,044
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   1,420,251
<PP&E>                             251,945
<DEPRECIATION>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     10,041,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              6,310,972
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                           11,302
<OTHER-SE>                         (114,867)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       10,041,443
<SALES>                            3,484,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   3,484,000
<CGS>                              3,037,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      606,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (159,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (159,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       (159,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                        (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (.03)



</TABLE>