alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1



                    Computation of Earnings per Common Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    Three Months Ended         Six Months Ended
                                         June 30,                  June 30,

                                     2000         1999         2000         1999
                                  ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
<S>                               <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Basic Earnings
  Net Income to Common Shares     $1,691,894   $1,318,522   $2,813,691   $  185,979

Basic Shares
  Weighted Average Outstanding     4,339,940    4,221,018    4,339,940    3,626,639

Basic Earnings (Loss) per Share   $     0.39   $     0.31   $     0.65   $     0.03
                                  ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

Diluted Shares
  Weighted Average Outstanding     4,443,336    4,221,018    4,414,449    3,626,639

Diluted Earnings per Share        $     0.38   $     0.31   $     0.64   $     0.03
                                  ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
</TABLE>
NO. 07-04-0294-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	JANUARY 12, 2005

	______________________________

	JOE W. NELSON, APPELLANT

	V.

	LUBBOCK CENTRAL APPRAISAL DIST., APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 99TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2000-732,542; HONORABLE SAM MEDINA, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	As assignee of Joe W. Nelson, appellant Samuel Brown Silverman perfected this appeal from the trial court’s order granting claims to excess proceeds.  By letter dated November 30, 2004, this Court notified Silverman that appellant’s brief was due on or before December 30, 2004, indicating that failure to comply might result in dismissal for want of prosecution pursuant to Rule 38.8(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.  Silverman did not respond and the brief remains outstanding.

	Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution and failure to comply with a directive of this Court.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b) & (c).

						Don H. Reavis

						    Justice
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection  with the Annual  Report of Global Energy Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Nick
DeMare,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Nick DeMare
----------------------------
Nick DeMare
Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer




<PAGE>
#### George Feldman, Appellant, *v.*Klosk Bros. Inc. (a Domestic Corporation), Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

May 7, 1925.

Trial — conduct of trial — prejudicial remark by trial court after refusal to charge warrants reversal.

A remark by the trial court, after passing upon a request to charge, to the effect that while an exception might be taken to his refusal to charge, it would not avail the party anything, is prejudicial, and warrants a reversal of the judgment and a new trial.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Eighth District, entered in favor of the defendant.

*Deiches, Goldwater & Flynn [Monroe Goldwater*of counsel], for the appellant.

*J. Arthur Hilton,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam:

It was prejudicial to the rights of appellant for the trial court to state to the jury after passing upon a request to charge *“*You can take your exception and any other - exception you want to. It won’t do you much good.” Because of this, the judgment entered upon the verdict rendered in favor of the respondent must be reversed .and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to the appellant to abide the event.

All concur.
#### Jeremiah G. Hamilton, plaintiff, *vs.*Wentworth S. Butler, defendant.

1. There is no provision of law for over five term fees, in any action. Consequently, an extra term fee, after the cause has been on the calendar for five terms, and after it has- been once tried, although set down by the judge for another trial, at the next term, cannot be allowed for such term.

2. Where a cause has been three times tried, copies of notes taken by the stenographer on the first two trials cannot be allowed. Though very useful, they are not necessary disbursements, under section 311 of the Code.

3 The provision of the Code, (§ 307, *suid.*3,) allowing $25 for all proceedings before a new trial, only applies to cases where a new trial has been *granted;*not to those where a trial has never been completed, as where the jury disagree, or are discharged without rendering a verdict.

*4.*The item of $30 for trial fee, on an issue of fact, is properly allowed for every time the cause is tried, whether the jury agree or not.

(Before Robertson, Ch, J. at special term,

November, 1865.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TERESA CARRIER, et al., :

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. : CIVIL ACTION 14-00311-KD-C

:

NAVIKA CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no 

objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(l)(B) and dated June 10, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the claims of Plaintiffs Teresa Carrier, Patricia 

Hannon and April McGee, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in accordance with 

Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute and abide by the

Court’s orders.

DONE and ORDERED this the 26th day of June 2015.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:14-cv-00311-KD-C Document 49 Filed 07/01/15 Page 1 of 1
GMAC
                              COMMERCIAL CREDIT LLC
                1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS o NEW YORK, NY 10104
                                  212-408-7000

September 24, 1999

Greka Integrated, Inc.
Saba Realty, Inc.
Santa Maria Refining Company
3201 Airpark Drive, Suite 201
Santa Maria, CA 93455

Ladies/Gentlemen:

         Reference is made to the Loan & Security  Argeement between us dated as
of April 30, 1999 (the "Agreement"). All capitalized terms not otherwise defined
herein shall have such meaning as are ascribed to them under the Argeement.

         This  letter  shall  serve to confirm  the  agreement  between us, that
effective  immediately  the  Agreement  shall be amended by deleting  the dollar
amount of "$5,000,000" appearing in the definition of "Maximum Revolving Amount"
appearing  on page 6 of the  Agreement  and by  inserting  the dollar  amount of
"$6,000,000" in its place and stead.

         Except as hereby specifically  modified or amended all of the terms and
conditions set forth in the Agreement shall continue to remain in full force and
effect in accordance with their original terms.

         If the foregoing  correctly sets forth the agreement between us, please
execute a copy of this  letter in the space  provided  below and  return a fully
executed copy to our offices.

                                            Very truly yours,
                                            GMAC COMMERCIAL CREDIT LLC

                                            By: /S/
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Title:
READ & AGREED TO:
GREKA INTEGRATED, INC.

By: /S/ Randeep S. Grewal
    -------------------------------
Title: Chairman, CEO & President

SABA REALTY, INC

By: /S/ Randeep S. Grewal
    -------------------------------
Title: Chairman, CEO & President

SANTA MARIA REFINING COMPANY

By: /S/ Randeep S. Grewal
    -------------------------------
Title: Chairman, CEO & President
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1945 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Labor, 

Office of Disability Employment Policy for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Labor, Office of Disability Employment Policy for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OFFICE OF DIS5 ABILITY EMPLOYMENT POLICY FOR FISCAL 

6 YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Department of Labor, Office of Disability EmVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:14 Apr 14, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1945.IH H1945

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1945 IH

1 ployment Policy for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $38,203,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
11829.

#### Wiggins *v.*Jonas & Company.

Decided April 14, 1921.

Jenkins, P. J.

1. Where a defendant in attachment moves to dismiss the attachment proceeding, upon the ground that the bond given by the plaintiff is void, he must specifically point out its defects. *English*v. *Reed,*97 *Ga.*477, 478 (25 S. E. 325). The record in the instant case fails to set forth any specific ground of objection to the bond. The grounds urged in the lower court were as follows: (1) “because the law has not been complied with by plaintiff before the issuance of said attachment as to the giving of the necessary bond;” and (2) “because the paper purporting to be a bond, copy of which bond is attached hereto marked ‘ Exhibit B,’ upon which the attachment issued, is not sufficient under the law and is ineffective as a bond under the law.” Under the authority cited, such general objections must be held insufficient.

2, The defendant having offered no evidence in denial of her liability upon the open account sued on, and as the plaintiff’s evidence made out its case by competent testimony,' thus undisputed, irrespective of the copy letters, to the introduction of which exception was taken, their admission, even if not proper, must be treated as harmless. The objection raised to the express receipts, upon the ground that they were not identified with the goods sold to the defendant, is not sustained by the evidence disclosed by the record.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Stephens and Hill, JJ., concur.*

*707Attachment; from Calhoun superior court — Judge Harrell. June 7, 1920.

*E. L. Smith, A. L. Miller,*for plaintiff in error.

*C. J. Taylor,*contra.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(2)


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Pharmacia Corporation's
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-36636, 2-76696, 2-90152, 33-13197,
33-21030, 33-39704, 33-39705, 33-39706, 33-39707, 33-49717, 33-53363, 33-53365,
33-53367, 333-02783, 333-02961, 333-02963, 333-33531, 333-38599, 333-40136,
333-34112, 333-34344, 333-45341, 333-64120, 333-76653 and 333-82002) and a
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-66175) of our report dated February
5, 2002 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Staff Accounting Bulletin No.
101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, in 2000), on the consolidated
financial statements of Monsanto Company and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2001 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2001; and of
our report dated February 25, 2000, on the statements of consolidated income,
cash flow, shareowners' equity and comprehensive income of the former Monsanto
Company and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31 1999, incorporated by
reference in the annual report of Pharmacia Corporation on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2001.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


St. Louis, Missouri
March 5, 2002
Exh 10.1


		
			Exhibit 10.1
		

		
			 
		

		
			CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
		

		
			OF
		

		
			CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
		

		
			OF
		

		
			CALLON PETROLEUM COMPANY
		

		
			 
		

		
			The undersigned, B.F. Weatherly, Corporate Secretary of Callon Petroleum Company, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify as follows:
		

		
			 
		

		
			FIRST:The name of the Corporation is Callon Petroleum Company.
		

		
			 
		

		
			SECOND:This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation (the “Certificate”) was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.  The Board of Directors has duly adopted resolutions setting forth and declaring advisable this Amendment and the holders of a majority of the outstanding stock of the Corporation entitled to vote at the special meeting of the stockholders called and held upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware for the purpose of voting on the Amendment have voted in favor of this Amendment.
		

		
			 
		

		
			THIRD:The Certificate is hereby amended by amending and restating the first sentence of Article Four to be and read as follows:
		

		
			 
		

		
			“The Corporation shall have authority to issue two classes of stock, and the total number authorized shall be 150,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, and 2,500,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share.”
		

		
			 
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment on behalf of the Corporation and has attested such execution and does verify and affirm, under penalty of perjury, that this Amendment is the act and deed of the Corporation and that the facts stated herein are true as of this 20th day of May, 2015.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Callon Petroleum Company
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			By:_/s/ B.F. Weatherly_____________
		

		
			B.F. Weatherly, Corporate Secretary
		

		 


		

			H-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S.D.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                     108,068,310
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,994,899
<ALLOWANCES>                                   802,223
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           122,173,119
<PP&E>                                       4,260,167
<DEPRECIATION>                                 285,886
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             127,546,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,845,580
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       199,523
<OTHER-SE>                                 112,501,647
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               127,546,750
<SALES>                                     15,332,703
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,332,703
<CGS>                                        3,467,081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,467,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,743,921
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,788,997
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                910,698
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            910,698
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   910,698
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule contains summary financial information extrated from the Form
10-QSB of Kent Financial Services,  Inc., for the six months ended June 30, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                   0000316028
<NAME>                                  KENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                            1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      3,051
<SECURITIES>                                10,123
<RECEIVABLES>                               677
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,851
<PP&E>                                      1,717
<DEPRECIATION>                              576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,269
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       931
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    184
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,269
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            3,922
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            2,629
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,079
<INCOME-TAX>                                9
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,070
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                1,070
<EPS-BASIC>                                 .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .57



</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.01


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-147975, 333-145742, 333-113899, 333-110248, 333-77068, 333-68342 and 33-46624) and Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-150944, 333-142745, 333-136705, 333-113914, 333-104711, 333-64552, 333-59842, 333-55822, 333-35730, 333-32460, 333-93591, 333-92159 and 333-87505) of SWK Holdings Corporation of our report (which contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s sale of substantially all of its assets, as described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements) dated March 29, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.
 
 
 /s/ Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc.
 
 San Jose, California
 March 29, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30059]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLWY920000 L14300000.EU0000; WYW 167526]


Notice of Realty Action: Modified Competitive Sealed Bid Sale of 
Public Land in Sweetwater County, Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice corrects the date that the Bureau of Land 
Management will open sealed bids for this public land sale. The 
original notice, which was published on Tuesday November 18, 2014, (79 
FR 68693), incorrectly stated the date. On page 68693, column 3, line 9 
under DATES, which reads ``January 20, 2015'', is hereby corrected to 
read ``January 21, 2015.''

Mary Jo Rugwell,
Acting Wyoming State Director.
[FR Doc. 2014-30059 Filed 12-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of BF Acquisition Group I, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2001 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),
I, William Colucci, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: January 22, 2004

                               /s/ William Colucci
                               ----------------------------
                               William Colucci, Treasurer
                               BF Acquisition Group I, Inc.
NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition is 

not citable as precedent. It is a public record. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 

04-3388 

VICTOR VASQUEZ, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, 

 Respondent. 

 __________________________ 

 DECIDED: May 6, 2005 

 __________________________ 

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, MAYER, and LOURIE, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. 

Victor Vasquez appeals the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, 

which dismissed his appeal as untimely and for lack of jurisdiction. Vasquez v. Merit 

Sys. Prot. Bd., DE3443030425-I-1 (MSPB Sept. 23, 2003). We affirm. 

 Vasquez claims that in 1987 he took an air traffic controller examination that was 

stolen from him and given to someone else to sign. Vasquez failed to file an appeal to 

the board until July 23, 2003, sixteen years after the incident allegedly occurred. In an 

attempt to cure this defect, Vasquez submitted two appeal forms to the board that were 

dated 1986 and 1987. It is apparent from the face of these documents, however, that 
they are not authentic. Because we affirm the board’s holding that Vasquez’s appeal 

was untimely filed, see Stahl v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 83 F.3d 409, 413 (Fed. Cir. 1996) 

(appeal to the board must meet the timeliness requirement in 5 C.F.R. § 1201.22(b)), 

we do not address the board’s alternate holding that subject matter jurisdiction was

lacking. 

04-3388 2