alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         187,806
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   783
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     62,949
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,233,024
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,204,573
<LOANS>                                      3,735,941
<ALLOWANCE>                                     54,273
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,342,843
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,840,439
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,122,509
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             47,094
<LONG-TERM>                                    615,802
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           326
<OTHER-SE>                                     626,672
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 626,998
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                184,711
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               44,435
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               229,146
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              81,121
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             142,780
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           86,366
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   17,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               4,366
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                133,687
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,247
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,247
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       722
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.19
<LOANS-NON>                                     44,246
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   921
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                52,161
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 (13,833)
<RECOVERIES>                                    10,701
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               54,273
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            54,273
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
May 17, 2000


Dlena Pratt
Norwest Bank
11000 Brokenland Parkway
Columbia Maryland 21044

RE: Officer's Certificate
Structured Assets Mortgage Ivestment
Pass Through Certificates
MERRIL LYNCH 1999-2

Dear Trustee:

The undersigned officer certifies the following for the 1999 calendar year.

a)   I have  reviewed the  activities  and performances  of the Servicer during
     the preceding fiscal year under the terms of the Servicing Agreement, Trust
     Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Servicer Guide and to the
     best of my knowledge, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its duties,
     responsibilities or obligations under these Agreements throughout such
     year, or if there has been a default or failure of the Servicer to perform
     any such duties, responsibilities or obligations, a description of each
     default or failure and the nature and status thereof has been reported to
     Norwest. No subservicer exits for 1999-2.;

b)   I have confirmed that the Servicer is currently an approved FNMA or FHLMC
     Servicer in good standing;

c)   I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions Insurance
     Policy and any other bonds required under the terms of the Servicing
     Agreement, Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Servicer
     Guide are in full force and effect;

d)   All premiums for each Hazard Insurance Policy, Flood Insurance Policy (if
     applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if applicable), with
     respects to each Mortgaged Property, have been paid and that such insurance
     policies are in full force and effect;

e)   All real estate taxes, governmental assessments and any other expenses
     accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or encumbrance on
     any Mortgage Property, have been paid, or if any such costs or expenses
     have been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the reason for the
     non-payment has been reported to Norwest.

f)   All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

g)   All annual reports of Foreclosure and Abandonment of Mortgaged Property
     required per section 6050J and 6050P of the Internal Revenue Code,
     respectively, have been prepared and filed.


Certified by:

Officer

Director - Loan Servicing
Title

05/17/2000
Date

\invaoc\offcertf3-6-98
11336.

#### Tallulah Falls Railway Co *v.*Davis, adm’x.

Decided January 27, 1921.

Action for damages; from Habersham superior court — Judge J. B. Jones. December 24, 1919.

*Fortson &*Bradwell, for plaintiff in error.

*R. R. Arnold, Howard Thompson,*contra.

Luke, J.

1. The measure of damages recoverable in a suit brought under the Federal employer’s liability act being only the amount the deceased, if he had ndt died, would have contributed to his legal beneficiaries (the plaintiff and her child in the instant case), it was reversible error for the court to instruct the jury as follows: “ If entitled to recover anything, it should be such an amount as would he a fair cash equivalent of his full yearly earning capacity when he lost his life, payable in annual installments until his death. ”

2. Although elsewhere in his charge, but not in direct connection with the above excerpt, the judge correctly instructed the jury upon this subject, it cannot, under repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, be held that the erroneous charge was harmless error, since it was never specifically retracted.

3. After a careful examination of the several assignments of error, the above ruling deals with the only complaint that contains reversible error. ' • >

*-Judgment reversed.*

*Bloodworth, J., eoncws. Broyles, G. J., disqualified.*
```
**Exhibit 32**
```

```
 
```

Section1350 Certifications 

 

----

**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**

 

 

The undersigned,the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Southern FirstBancshares, Inc. (the "company"), each certify that, to his knowledge on thedate of this certification:

 

1.     The annual report of the company for the period ended December 31,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the company.

 

 

                                                                Date:       March 24, 2008                                    By:         /s/R. Arthur Seaver, Jr.       

                                                                                                                                                                R.Arthur Seaver, Jr.

                                                                                                                                                                ChiefExecutive Officer

 

 

                                                               Date:        March 24, 2008                                  By:          /s/ James M. Austin, III      

                                                                                                                                                                JamesM. Austin, III

                                                                                                                                                                ChiefFinancial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection
with the Quarterly Report of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. (CRM) on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerome S. Flum, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge: (1)
The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:
/s/
Jerome S.
  FlumJerome S. FlumChief Executive OfficerAugust 14,
  2006 21
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1722 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1722

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-three

                                 An Act

 
    To amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Grand Ronde Reservation Act 
Amendment of 2023''.
SEC. 2. GRAND RONDE RESERVATION ACT AMENDMENT.
    Section 1(d) of Public Law 100-425 (commonly known as the ``Grand 
Ronde Reservation Act''; 102 Stat. 1594; 108 Stat. 4566) is amended--
        (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``lands within the State of 
    Oregon'' and inserting ``the 84 acres known as the Thompson 
    Strip'';
        (2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and
        (3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
        ``(2) Gaming prohibition.--Any real property obtained by the 
    Tribes as part of a land claim settlement approved by the United 
    States, including any real property purchased with funds granted as 
    part of any land claim settlement, shall not be eligible, or used, 
    for any class II gaming or class III gaming under the Indian Gaming 
    Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) (as those terms are defined 
    in section 4 of that Act (25 U.S.C. 2703)).''.
SEC. 3. TREATY RIGHTS OF FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBES.
     Nothing in this Act, or an amendment made by this Act, shall be 
construed to enlarge, confirm, adjudicate, affect, or modify any treaty 
right of an Indian Tribe (as defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304)).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          841501                       
<NAME>                                         OWENS MORTGAGE INVESTMENT FUND
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         9,356,194
<SECURITIES>                                   3,574,873
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,255,831
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,186,898
<PP&E>                                         10,229,499
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 199,362,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,067,729
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     197,294,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   199,362,500
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,269,642
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,876,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,392,903
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,392,903
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,392,903
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .017
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .017
        


</TABLE>
NO. 12-10-00244-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

LUIS GONZALEZ MEDELLIN,

APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 114TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, ' SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant was convicted 

of felony driving while intoxicated, and attempts to appeal the order to withdraw court 

costs from his inmate trust account.

As pertinent here, Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal 

is perfected when notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the trial court enters an 

appealable order. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The trial court entered the complained of 

order on April 20, 2010. Therefore, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to have been 

filed on or before May 20, 2010. However, Appellant did not file his notice of appeal 

until August 2, 2010, and did not file a motion for extension of time to file his notice of 

appeal as permitted by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3 

(appellate court may extend time for filing notice of appeal if, within fifteen days after 

deadline for filing notice of appeal, appellant files notice of appeal in trial court and 

motion complying with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b) in appellate court).

On September 20, 2010, this court notified Appellant that his notice of appeal was 

untimely and that there was no timely motion for an extension of time to file the notice of 

appeal as permitted by rule 26.3. Appellant was further informed that the appeal would 

be dismissed unless, on or before September 30, 2010, the information filed in this appeal 

was amended to show the jurisdiction of this court. The deadline has passed, and 

Appellant has neither shown the jurisdiction of this court nor otherwise responded to its 

September 20, 2010 notice.
2

Because this court has no authority to allow the late filing of a notice of appeal 

except as provided by rule 26.3, the appeal must be dismissed. See Slaton v. State, 981 

S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1996). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. All 

pending motions are overruled as moot.

Opinion delivered October 6, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
#### Reynolds *v.*Ross.

Slander.—In a complaint for slander, the words spoken were alleged thus: “You are a G—d d-d, lying, thieving son of a bitch.”

*Held,*on demurrer, that the words were actionable.

APPEAL from the Delaware Circuit Court.

*y. S. Buckles*and *y W. Ryan,*for appellant.

71 *y. Sample,*for appellee.

Downey, J.

Action for slander by the appellee against the appellant: A demurrer to the complaint was overruled, and the appellant excepted. Issues were formed, and there was a trial by jury, and a verdict for the plaintiff A motion by the defendant for a new trial overruled, and final judgment for the plaintiff.

But one question is presented by the assignment of error, and that is as to the sufficiency of'the complaint. The objection is that the words as charged are not actionable. The words alleged to have been spoken to and of the plaintiff are these: *“*You are a G—d d-d, lying, thieving son of a bitch.” In *Alley*v. *Neely,*5 Blackf. 200, this court said : “The adjective thieving imports an act committed, and not merely an inclination to commit it. To charge one with being a thieving person is charging him with being guilty of stealing. *Bittridge’s Case,*4 Coke’s Rep. 19; *Osborn*v. *Poole,*1 Lord Raym. 236; Stark, on Slander, 64.” The use of the letters “ G—d d-d ” does not render the complaint bad in this case. If they are wholly omitted or disregarded, the slanderous charge is still the same.

The judgment, which was for one hundred and forty dollars, is affirmed, with ten per cent, damages and costs.
September 2, 20 15 

Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice 

Fourth Court of Appeals 

Cadena-Reeves Justice Center 

300 Dolorosa, Suite 3200 

San Antonio, Texas 78205 

Re.: Court of Appeals Number: 04-14-00807 -CV 

Trial Court Case Number: M-12-0045-CV-A 

Aery, eta!. vs. Hoskins, Inc., eta!. 

Dear Hon. Justice Bryan Marion: 

I -

• 

UHLI FITZSIMONS/ 

jEWETT & BURTON/ PLLC 

4040 Broadway, Suite 430 

San Antonio, Texas 78209 

T 210.829.1660 

F 210.829.1641 

In response to the Court's letter of July 30, 2015, please be advised that Appellee Blake 

C. Hoskins will yield his oral argument time to Ellen Mitchell, counsel for Appellees C. Clifton 

Hoskins and Hoskins, Inc. 

EAJ/eaj 

{739/003/00108097.DOCX;l} 

Sincerely, 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

ufjblaw.com 

ACCEPTED

04-14-00807-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

9/3/2015 9:03:17 AM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/3/2015 9:03:17 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
islt_ex101.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


Execution Version


 


AMENDMENT TO EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT


 


This AMENDMENT TO EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is dated as of the 29th day of May, 2015 (the “Amendment Date”) by and between Brighthaven Ventures, L.L.C., a North Carolina limited liability company having its registered office at 3200 East Hwy. 54, Suite 100, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 (“BHV”) and Islet Sciences, Inc., a Nevada corporation having its principal place of business at 6601 Six Forks Rd., Suite 140, Raleigh, NC 27615 (“ISLT”).  All capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.


 


WITNESSETH THAT:


 


WHEREAS, BHV and ISLT entered into the Exclusive License Agreement dated March 3, 2015 (the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, in accordance with Article 29 of the Agreement, BHV and ISLT wish to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment;


 


NOW,   THEREFORE,   in consideration   of   the   covenants   and   obligations expressed herein, and intending to be legally bound, the Parties hereto agree as follows:







1.           The fourth sentence of Article 33 of the Agreement (in which the Financing Period is defined) is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:







The “Financing Period” shall constitute that period of time beginning on the Execution Date and ending on June 15, 2015.







2.           This Amendment is limited as specified and shall not constitute a modification, amendment or waiver of any other provision of the Agreement.  Except as amended by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, subject to and in accordance with Article 33 of the Agreement.  For clarity, the Effectiveness Condition shall not be deemed to have been met, and the Effective Date shall not be deemed to have occurred, by virtue of this Amendment.  The Effective Date shall only occur, if at all, upon the satisfaction of the Effectiveness Condition prior to the end of the Financing Period (as such definition is amended by this Amendment) in accordance with Article 33 of the Agreement.







3.           The Amendment is effective as of the Amendment Date.  This Amendment may be executed by the Parties in one or more identical counterparts, all of which together will constitute this Amendment.  If this Amendment is executed in counterparts, no signatory hereto will be bound until both Parties have duly executed a counterpart of this Amendment.












[signature page to follow]


 




  





  











  






 


[Signature Page to Amendment to Exclusive License Agreement]


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties by their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement.


 




	 	Brighthaven Ventures, L.L.C.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Bentley Cheatham	 
	 	 	Bentley Cheatham, Ph.D.	 
	 	 	Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 	 	 	 





 




	 	Islet Sciences, Inc.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Steven R. Delmar	 
	 	 	Steven R. Delmar	 
	 	 	Chief Financial Officer