Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules 75763 

1 79 FR 32121 (June 4, 2014). 

2Pub. L. 104–208, Div. A, Title II, section 2222, 

110 Stat. 3009 (1996); codified at 12 U.S.C. 3311. 

3The Office of Thrift Supervision was still in 

existence at the time EGRPRA was enacted and was 

included in the listing of Agencies. Since that time, 

the OTS has been eliminated and its responsibilities 

have passed to the Agencies and the Consumer 

Financial Protection Bureau. 

4 Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement (IRPS) 

87–2, 52 FR 35231 (Sept. 8, 1987) as amended by 

IRPS 03–2, 68 FR 32127 (May 29, 2003.) (Reflecting 

NCUA’s commitment to ‘‘periodically update, 

clarify and simplify existing regulations and 

eliminate redundant and unnecessary provisions.’’) 

5 In addition to rules that have been transferred 

to the CFPB, insured credit unions are also subject 

to certain other regulations that are not required to 

be reviewed under the EGRPRA process, such as 

regulations issued by the Department of the 

Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. 

Any comment received during the EGRPRA process 

that pertains to such a rule will be forwarded to the 

appropriate agency. 

By order of the Board of Governors of the 

Federal Reserve System, December 12, 2014. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29561 Filed 12–18–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210–01–P 

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION 

ADMINISTRATION 

12 CFR Chapter VII 

Regulatory Publication and Review 

Under the Economic Growth and 

Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act 

of 1996 

AGENCY: National Credit Union 

Administration. 

ACTION: Notice of regulatory review; 

request for comments. 

SUMMARY: The NCUA Board (Board) is 

continuing its comprehensive review of 

its regulations to identify outdated, 

unnecessary, or burdensome regulatory 

requirements imposed on federally 

insured credit unions, as contemplated 

by section 2222 of the Economic Growth 

and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1996 (EGRPRA). This second 

decennial review of regulations began 

when the Board issued its first EGRPRA 

notice on May 22, 2014, covering the 

two categories of ‘‘Applications and 

Reporting’’ and ‘‘Powers and 

Activities.’’ 1 Today, the Board 

continues the review process with the 

publication of this second notice, 

covering the next three categories of 

rules: ‘‘Agency Programs,’’ ‘‘Capital,’’ 

and ‘‘Consumer Protection.’’ This 

review presents a significant 

opportunity to consider the possibilities 

for burden reduction in groups of 

similar regulations. The Board 

welcomes comment on the categories, 

the order of review, and all other 

aspects of this initiative in order to 

maximize the review’s effectiveness. 

DATES: Comment must be received on or 

before March 19, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any of the following methods (Please 

send comments by one method only): 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• NCUA Web site: http://www.ncua.

gov/RegulationsOpinionsLaws/

proposed_regs/proposed_regs.html. 

Follow the instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: Address to regcomments@

ncua.gov. Include ‘‘[Your name] 

Comments on Regulatory Review 

pursuant to EGRPRA’’ in the email 

subject line. 

• Fax: (703) 518–6319. Use the 

subject line described above for email. 

• Mail: Address to Gerard Poliquin, 

Secretary of the Board, National Credit 

Union Administration, 1775 Duke 

Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314– 

3428. 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as 

mail address. 

Public Inspection: All public 

comments are available on the agency’s 

Web site at http://www.ncua.gov/Legal/ 

Regs/Pages/PropRegs.aspx as submitted, 

except as may not be possible for 

technical reasons. Public comments will 

not be edited to remove any identifying 

or contact information. Paper copies of 

comments may be inspected in NCUA’s 

law library at 1775 Duke Street, 

Alexandria, Virginia 22314, by 

appointment weekdays between 9:00 

a.m. and 3:00 p.m. To make an 

appointment, call (703) 518–6546 or 

send an email to OGCMail@ncua.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ross 

P. Kendall, Special Counsel to the 

General Counsel, at the above address, 

or telephone: (703) 518–6562. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Introduction 

Congress enacted EGRPRA 2 as part of 

an effort to minimize unnecessary 

government regulation of financial 

institutions consistent with safety and 

soundness, consumer protection, and 

other public policy goals. Under 

EGRPRA, the appropriate federal 

banking agencies (Office of the 

Comptroller of the Currency, Board of 

Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System, and Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation; herein Agencies 3) and the 

Federal Financial Institutions 

Examination Council (FFIEC) must 

review their regulations to identify 

outdated, unnecessary, or unduly 

burdensome requirements imposed on 

insured depository institutions. The 

Agencies are required, jointly or 

individually, to categorize regulations 

by type, such as ‘‘consumer regulations’’ 

or ‘‘safety and soundness’’ regulations. 

Once the categories have been 

established, the Agencies must provide 

notice and ask for public comment on 

one or more of these regulatory 

categories. 

NCUA is not technically required to 

participate in the EGRPRA review 

process, since NCUA is not an 

‘‘appropriate Federal banking agency’’ 

as specified in EGRPRA. In keeping 

with the spirit of the law, however, the 

Board has once again elected to 

participate in the review process. Thus, 

NCUA has participated along with the 

Agencies in the planning process, but 

has developed its own regulatory 

categories that are comparable with 

those developed by the Agencies. 

Because of the unique circumstances of 

federally insured credit unions and their 

members, the Board is issuing a separate 

notice from the Agencies. NCUA’s 

notice is consistent and comparable 

with the Agencies’ notice, except on 

issues that are unique to credit unions. 

In accordance with the objectives of 

EGRPRA, the Board asks the public to 

identify areas of its regulations that are 

outdated, unnecessary, or unduly 

burdensome. In addition to this second 

notice, the Board will issue two more 

notices for comment during 2015, at 

regular intervals. The EGRPRA review 

supplements and complements the 

reviews of regulations that NCUA 

conducts under other laws and its 

internal policies.4

As the Board noted in its initial 

EGRPRA notice in May 2014, the 

creation of the Consumer Financial 

Protection Bureau (CFPB) resulted in 

the transfer to CFPB of responsibility for 

certain consumer protection rules that 

had previously been the responsibility 

of the Agencies and/or NCUA, such as 

Regulation Z and rules governing 

consumer privacy. Because the CFPB is 

not covered by EGRPRA or required to 

participate in this regulatory review 

process, the Agencies and NCUA have 

excluded certain consumer protection 

regulations from the scope of the current 

review.5 In the case of rules 

implementing specific aspects of the 

Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in 

Savings Act, rules pertaining to fair 

lending in the housing area, and flood 

insurance, NCUA has retained rulewriting authority. Therefore, these rules 

are retained for purposes of the EGRPRA 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

75764 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

6 IRPS 87–2, 52 FR 35231 (Sept. 8, 1987) as 

amended by IRPS 03–2, 68 FR 32127 (May 29, 

2003). 7 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. 8 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. 9Pub. L. 104–121, 110 Stat 857 (1996). 

10Consistent with EGRPRA’s focus on reducing 

burden on insured credit unions, the Board has not 

included internal, organizational or operational 

regulations in this review. These regulations impose 

minimal, if any, burden on insured credit unions. 

11Commenters should note, in this respect, that 

for new regulations that have only recently gone 

into effect, some passage of time may be necessary 

before the burden associated with the regulatory 

requirements can be fully and properly understood. 

review and comprise one of the 

categories for which comment is 

currently being solicited. Rules 

pertaining to share insurance and 

advertising also remain within NCUA’s 

province and, therefore, are included as 

well. 

EGRPRA contemplates a two-part 

regulatory response. First, NCUA will 

publish in the Federal Register a 

summary of the comments it receives, 

identifying and discussing the 

significant issues raised. Second, the 

law directs the Agencies to ‘‘eliminate 

unnecessary regulations to the extent 

that such action is appropriate.’’ As was 

done during the initial decennial review 

process, the Board anticipates that it 

will prepare its response separately 

from the Agencies, but at around the 

same time. 

EGRPRA further requires the FFIEC to 

submit a report to the Congress within 

30 days after NCUA and the Agencies 

publish the comment summary and 

analysis in the Federal Register. This 

report must summarize any significant 

issues raised by the public comments 

and the relative merits of those issues. 

The report also must analyze whether 

the appropriate federal financial 

regulator involved is able to address the 

regulatory burdens associated with the 

issues by regulation, or whether the 

burdens must be addressed by 

legislation. The FFIEC report submitted 

to Congress following the initial 

decennial EGRPRA review included an 

Agency section discussing banking 

sector issues and a separate section 

devoted to NCUA and credit union 

issues. It is likely that the FFIEC will 

follow a similar approach in this second 

decennial EGRPRA review and report 

process. 

II. The EGRPRA Review’s Special 

Focus 

The regulatory review contemplated 

by EGRPRA provides a significant 

opportunity for the public and the 

Board to consider groups of related 

regulations and identify possibilities for 

streamlining. The EGRPRA review’s 

overall focus on the totality of 

regulations will offer a new perspective 

in identifying opportunities to reduce 

regulatory burden. For example, the 

EGRPRA review may facilitate the 

identification of regulatory requirements 

that are no longer consistent with the 

way business is conducted and that 

therefore might be eliminated. Of 

course, reducing regulatory burden must 

be consistent with ensuring the 

continued safety and soundness of 

federally insured credit unions and 

appropriate consumer protections. 

EGRPRA also recognizes that burden 

reduction must be consistent with 

NCUA’s statutory mandates, many of 

which currently require certain 

regulations. One of the significant 

aspects of the EGRPRA review program 

is the recognition that effective burden 

reduction in certain areas may require 

legislative change. The Board will be 

soliciting comment on, and reviewing 

the comments and regulations carefully 

for, the relationship among burden 

reduction, regulatory requirements, and 

statutory mandates. This will be a key 

aspect of the report to Congress. 

The Board views the approach of 

considering the relationship of 

regulatory and statutory change on 

regulatory burden, in concert with 

EGRPRA’s provisions calling for 

grouping regulations by type, to provide 

the potential for particularly effective 

burden reduction. The Board believes 

the EGRPRA review can also 

significantly contribute to its on-going 

efforts to reduce regulatory burden. 

Since 1987, a formally adopted NCUA 

policy has required the Board to review 

each of its regulations at least once 

every three years with a view toward 

eliminating, simplifying, or otherwise 

easing the burden of each regulation.6

Further, the Board addresses the issue of 

regulatory burden every time it proposes 

and adopts a rule. NCUA complies with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 7

the Regulatory Flexibility Act 8 and the 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 9 in connection 

with each rulemaking and evaluates the 

burdens the rulemaking might impose 

on the industry, consistent with safety 

and soundness and consumer protection 

considerations. 

The Board is particularly sensitive to 

the impact of agency rules on small 

institutions. In 2013, the Board formally 

increased the threshold for meeting the 

‘‘small’’ classification to having assets of 

$50 million or less. The Board is 

cognizant that each new or amended 

regulation has the potential for requiring 

significant expenditures of time, effort, 

and money to achieve compliance, and 

also that this burden can be particularly 

difficult for institutions of smaller asset 

size, with fewer resources available. 

III. The Board’s Proposed Plan 

EGRPRA contemplates the 

categorization of regulations by ‘‘type.’’ 

During the initial decennial review, the 

Board developed and published for 

comment ten categories for NCUA’s 

rules, including some that had been 

issued jointly with the Agencies. The 

Board believes these initial categories 

worked well for the purpose of 

presenting a framework for the review 

and so has retained them for this second 

review.10 The categories, in alphabetical 

order, are: Agency Programs; 

Applications and Reporting; Capital; 

Consumer Protection; Corporate Credit 

Unions; Directors, Officers and 

Employees; Money Laundering; Powers 

and Activities; Rules of Procedure; and 

Safety and Soundness. As noted above, 

some of the rules in the consumer 

protection category are now under 

CFPB’s jurisdiction and administration, 

and those affected rules have been 

eliminated. Any rules adopted for the 

first time since 2006 have been included 

in the appropriate category.11 Rules still 

in proposed form are not included in 

this review; commenters may be sure 

that comments submitted directly in 

response to proposed rules will be given 

due consideration within that process. 

As the Board noted during the initial 

decennial review, although there are 

other possible ways of categorizing its 

rules, these ten categories ‘‘are logical 

groupings that are not so broad such 

that the number of regulations presented 

in any one category would overwhelm 

potential commenters. The categories 

also reflect recognized areas of industry 

interest and specialization or are 

particularly critical to the health of the 

credit union system.’’ As was also noted 

during the initial review, some 

regulations, such as lending, pertain to 

more than one category and are 

included in all applicable categories. 

The Board remains convinced that 

publishing its rules for public comment 

separately from the Agencies is the most 

effective method for achieving 

EGRPRA’s burden reduction goals for 

federally insured credit unions. Owing 

to differences in the credit union system 

as compared to the banking system, 

there is not a direct, category by 

category, correlation between NCUA’s 

rules and those of the Agencies. For 

example, credit unions deal with issues 

such as membership, credit union 

service organizations, and corporate 

credit unions, all of which are unique to 

credit union operations. Similarly, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules 75765 

certain categories identified by the 

Agencies have limited or no 

applicability in the credit union sector, 

such as community reinvestment, 

international operations, and securities. 

The categories developed by the Board 

and the Agencies reflect these 

differences. The Board intends to 

maintain comparability with the 

Agencies’ notices to the extent there is 

overlap or similarity in the issues and 

the categories. 

After the conclusion of the comment 

period for each EGRPRA notice 

published in the Federal Register, the 

Board will review the comments it has 

received and decide whether further 

action is appropriate with respect to the 

categories of regulations included in 

that notice. 

The Board has prepared two charts to 

assist public understanding of the 

organization of its review. The first 

chart, set forth at Section V.A. below, 

presents the three categories of 

regulations on which NCUA is 

requesting burden reduction 

recommendations in this notice. The 

three categories are shown in the left 

column. In the middle column are the 

subject matters that fall within the 

categories and in the far right column 

are the regulatory citations. The second 

chart, set forth at Section V.B. below, 

presents the remaining five categories in 

alphabetical order in a similar format. 

IV. Request for Burden Reduction 

Recommendations for the Categories of 

Regulations: ‘‘Agency Programs,’’ 

‘‘Capital,’’ and ‘‘Consumer Protection’’ 

The Board seeks public comment on 

regulations within the following three 

categories—‘‘Agency Programs,’’ 

‘‘Capital,’’ and ‘‘Consumer 

Protection’’—that may impose outdated, 

unnecessary, or unduly burdensome 

regulatory requirements on federally 

insured credit unions. Comments that 

cite particular provisions or language, 

and provide reasons why such 

provisions should be changed, would be 

most helpful to NCUA’s review efforts. 

Suggested alternative provisions or 

language, where appropriate, would also 

be helpful. If the implementation of a 

comment would require modifying a 

statute that underlies the regulation, the 

comment should, if possible, identify 

the needed statutory change. 

Specific issues for commenters to 

consider. While all comments related to 

any aspect of the EGRPRA review are 

welcome, the Board specifically invites 

comment on the following issues: 

• Need and purpose of the 

regulations. Do the regulations in these 

categories fulfill current needs? Has 

industry or other circumstances 

changed since a regulation was written 

such that the regulation is no longer 

necessary? Have there been shifts within 

the industry or consumer actions that 

suggest a re-focus of the underlying 

regulations? 

Do any of the regulations in these 

categories impose burdens not required 

by their authorizing statutes? 

• Need for statutory change. Do the 

statutes impose unnecessary 

requirements? Are any of the statutory 

requirements underlying these 

categories redundant, conflicting or 

otherwise unduly burdensome? If so, 

how should the statutes be amended? 

• Overarching approaches/flexibility 

of the regulatory standards. Generally, is 

there a different approach to regulating 

that the Board could use that would 

achieve statutory goals while imposing 

less burden? Do any of the regulations 

in these categories or the statutes 

underlying them impose unnecessarily 

inflexible requirements? 

• Effect of the regulations on 

competition. Do any of the regulations 

in these categories or the statutes 

underlying them create competitive 

disadvantages for credit unions 

compared to another part of the 

financial services industry? If so, how 

should these regulations be amended? 

• Reporting, recordkeeping and 

disclosure requirements. Do any of the 

regulations in these categories or the 

statutes underlying them impose 

particularly burdensome reporting, 

recordkeeping or disclosure 

requirements? Are any of these 

requirements similar enough in purpose 

and use so that they could be 

consolidated? What, if any, of these 

requirements could be fulfilled 

electronically to reduce their burden? 

Please provide specific 

recommendations. 

• Consistency and redundancy. Do 

any of the regulations in these categories 

impose inconsistent or redundant 

regulatory requirements that are not 

warranted by the circumstances? 

• Clarity. Are the regulations in these 

categories and the underlying statutes 

drafted in clear and easily understood 

language? Are there specific regulations 

or underlying statutes that need 

clarification? 

• Scope of rules. Is the scope of each 

rule in these categories consistent with 

the intent of the underlying statute(s)? 

Could NCUA amend the scope of a rule 

to clarify its applicability or to reduce 

the burden, while remaining faithful to 

statutory intent? If so, specify which 

regulation(s) should be clarified. 

• Burden on small insured 

institutions. The Board has a particular 

interest in minimizing burden on small 

insured credit unions (those with less 

than $50 million in assets). NCUA 

solicits comment on whether any 

regulations within these categories 

should be continued without change, 

amended or rescinded in order to 

minimize any significant economic 

impact the regulations may have on a 

substantial number of small federally 

insured credit unions. 

V. A. REGULATIONS ABOUT WHICH BURDEN REDUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS ARE REQUESTED CURRENTLY

Agency Programs ............................ Community Development Revolving Loan Program ............................. 12 CFR 705.

Central Liquidity Facility ......................................................................... 12 CFR 725. 

Designation of low-income status; receipt of secondary capital accounts by low-income designated credit unions.12 CFR 701.34. 

Capital ............................................. Prompt corrective action ........................................................................ 12 CFR 702. 

Adequacy of reserves ............................................................................ 12 CFR 741.3(a). 

Consumer Protection ...................... Nondiscrimination requirement (Fair Housing) ...................................... 12 CFR 701.31. 

Truth in Savings (TIS) ........................................................................... 12 CFR 707. 

Loans in areas having special flood hazards ........................................ 12 CFR 760. 

Fair Credit Reporting—identity theft red flags ....................................... 12 CFR 717, Subpart J. 

Fair Credit Reporting—disposal of consumer information .................... 12 CFR 717.83. 

Fair Credit Reporting—duties regarding address discrepancies .......... 12 CFR 717.82. 

Share insurance ..................................................................................... 12 CFR 745. 

Advertising ............................................................................................. 12 CFR 740. 

Disclosure of share insurance ............................................................... 12 CFR 741.10. 

Notice of termination of excess insurance coverage ............................ 12 CFR 741.5. 

Uninsured membership shares .............................................................. 12 CFR 741.9. 

Member inspection of credit union books, records, and minutes ......... 12 CFR 701.3. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

75766 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

V. B. CATEGORIES AND REGULATIONS ABOUT WHICH NCUA WILL SEEK COMMENT LATER

Corporate Credit Unions ................. Corporate credit unions ......................................................................... 12 CFR 704. 

Directors, Officers, and Employees Loans and lines of credit to officials ...................................................... 12 CFR 701.21(d). 

Reimbursement, insurance, and indemnification of officials and employees.12 CFR 701.33. 

Retirement benefits for employees ........................................................ 12 CFR 701.19. 

Management officials interlock .............................................................. 12 CFR 711. 

Fidelity bond and insurance coverage .................................................. 12 CFR 713. 

General authorities and duties of federal credit union directors ........... 12 CFR 701.4. 

Golden parachutes and indemnification payments ............................... 12 CFR 750. 

Money Laundering .......................... Report of crimes or suspected crimes .................................................. 12 CFR 748.1. 

Bank Secrecy Act .................................................................................. 12 CFR 748.2. 

Rules of Procedure ......................... Liquidation (involuntary and voluntary) .................................................. 12 CFR 709 and 710. 

Uniform rules of practice and procedure ............................................... 12 CFR 747, subpart A. 

Local rules of practice and procedure ................................................... 12 CFR 747, subparts B–M 

Safety and Soundness .................... Lending .................................................................................................. 12 CFR 701.21. 

Investments ............................................................................................ 12 CFR 703. 

Supervisory committee audit ................................................................. 12 CFR 715. 

Security programs .................................................................................. 12 CFR 748.0. 

Guidelines for safeguarding member information and responding to 

unauthorized access to member information.

12 CFR 748, Appendices A and B. 

Records preservation program and appendices—record retention; 

catastrophic act preparedness.

12 CFR 749. 

Appraisals .............................................................................................. 12 CFR 722. 

Examination ........................................................................................... 12 CFR 741.1. 

Liquidity and contingency funding plans ............................................... 12 CFR 741.12. 

Regulations codified elsewhere in NCUA’s regulations as applying to 

federal credit unions that also apply to federally insured state-chartered credit unions.

12 CFR 741, subpart B. 

By the National Credit Union 

Administration Board on December 11, 2014. 

Gerard Poliquin, 

Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29629 Filed 12–18–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7535–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

18 CFR Part 284 

[Docket No. RM14–2–000] 

Coordination of the Scheduling 

Processes of Interstate Natural Gas 

Pipelines and Public Utilities 

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, DOE. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; 

data request to Independent System 

Operators (ISOs) and Regional 

Transmission Organizations (RTOs). 

SUMMARY: On December 12, 2014, 

pursuant to authority delegated to the 

Director, Office of Energy Policy and 

Innovation, a data request was issued to 

each ISO and RTO regarding the effect 

on the reliable and efficient operations 

of natural gas-fired generators of the 

current 9 a.m. CCT start to the Gas Day. 

The requests seek data from the ISOs/

RTOs with respect to derates by natural 

gas generators during the morning ramp 

period. 

DATES: Responses to the data request 

must be filed on or before January 12, 

2015 in Docket No. RM14–2–000. 

Comments on the responses to the data 

request must be filed in the same docket 

within 10 days of the data request 

response, on or before January 22, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Responses and Comments, 

identified by docket number, may be 

filed in the following ways: 

• Electronic Filing through http://

www.ferc.gov. Documents created 

electronically using word processing 

software should be filed in native 

applications or print-to-PDF format and 

not in a scanned format. 

• Mail/Hand Delivery: Those unable 

to file electronically may mail or handdeliver comments to: Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the 

Commission, 888 First Street NE., 

Washington, DC 20426. 

Instructions: For detailed instructions 

on submitting responses and comments, 

see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

section of this document. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anna Fernandez (Legal Information), 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, Office of the General 

Counsel, 888 First Street NE., 

Washington, DC 20426, 202–502– 

6682; 

Caroline Daly Wozniak (Technical 

Information), Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission, Office of 

Energy Policy and Innovation, 888 

First Street NE., Washington, DC 

20426, 202–502–8931. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The data 

requests can be obtained over the 

Internet from the Commission’s eLibrary 

system (http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ 

elibrary.asp) under Docket No. RM14– 

2–000 or from the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room during normal business 

hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern 

time) at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A, 

Washington DC 20426. The full text of 

the data requests are available on 

eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word 

format. To access these documents in 

eLibrary, type the docket number 

excluding the last three digits of this 

document in the docket number field. 

All responses and comments will be 

placed in the Commission’s public files 

in Docket No. RM14–2–000, and may be 

viewed, printed, or downloaded 

remotely from the eLibrary system or 

obtained from the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room. The data responses 

and comments are not required to be 

served on other commenters or entities. 

User assistance is available for 

eLibrary and the Commission’s Web site 

during normal business hours from the 

Commission’s Online Support at 202– 

502–6652 (toll free at 1–866–208–3676) 

or email at ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, 

or the Public Reference Room at (202) 

502–8371, TTY (202) 502–8659. Email 

the Public Reference Room at 

public.referenceroom@ferc.gov. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS