alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1985 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1985

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
   Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National 
                Institute on Aging for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
   Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National 
                Institute on Aging for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 
              AND HUMAN SERVICES, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH 
              NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Health and 
Human Services, National Institutes of Health National Institute on 
Aging for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $3,083,410,000.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rondula Lane, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 920]

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Barry M. Donalty, J), rendered March 15, 2010. The judgment revoked *1427defendant’s sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the sentence of probation imposed upon his conviction of attempted burglary in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 140.25 [2]) and sentencing him to a determinate term of incarceration. We note at the outset that we do not consider defendant’s contentions with respect to the sufficiency of the evidence regarding his subsequent arrest. The record establishes that County Court did not find that defendant violated the condition of his probation directing that he “shall violate no further laws,” and thus there is no issue with respect to the evidence regarding that condition.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, the court properly determined that the People met their burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant violated the terms and conditions of his probation *(see People v Pringle,*72 AD3d 1629, 1629 [2010], *lv denied*15 NY3d 855 [2010]; *People v Bergman,*56 AD3d 1225, 1225 [2008], *lv denied*12 NY3d 756 [2009]). Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the sentence imposed upon the violation of probation is not unduly harsh or severe.

Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Centra, Carni and Sconiers, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Annual Report of WorldTeq Group International, Inc.
(the"Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report"), I, Jeffrey Lieberman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18U.S.C. Se ction 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
          by the Report.



                    /s/ Jeffrey Lieberman
                    -------------------
                    Jeffrey Lieberman
                    Chief Executive Officer,
                    President, Treasurer and Chairman of the Board

                    Date: April 14, 2004


<PAGE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-20540

 

IN RE DAVID EARL GIBBS,

Movant

 

Motion for an order authorizing the

United States District Court for the Southern

District of Texas, Houston Division, to consider

a successive habeas 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application

 

August 21, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit

Judges.

BY THE COURT:

I

On August 15, 2000, this court issued an opinion and order

denying authorization to file a successive petition. A three-judge

panel was properly convened and participated at every juncture of

deliberations except the final issuing of the order. One member of

the panel was not available until this morning. We acted as a

quorum to afford Gibbs the maximum opportunity to obtain review.

Instead, Gibbs’s sole response is that the order cannot be issued

by a quorum of a panel. We disagree with that contention. 

II

The third member of the panel now being available, the

previous order is re-issued. 

So ordered.
Exhibit 32.1

SELECTICA, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amendment to the annual report of Selectica, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brenda Zawatski, Co-Chair of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 7, 2009



|                      
|----------------------
|/S/    BRENDA
ZAWATSKI
|Brenda Zawatski       
|Co-Chair
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David K. Spohr, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of World Monitor Trust II  Series E for the period October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ David K. Spohr                      
|David K. Spohr                          
|Senior Vice President and               
|Director of Fund Administration         
|(Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)
|                                        
|Date: March 20, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CADENCE BANK, N.A., etc., )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION 15-0134-WS-N

 )

REX CABANNIS, et al., ) 

 )

Defendants. )

 ORDER

The plaintiff has filed a motion to strike jury demand. (Doc. 17). The 

defendants do not oppose the motion. (Doc. 27). Accordingly, the motion is 

granted. The defendants’ jury demand is stricken.

1

DONE and ORDERED this 28th day of July, 2015.

s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 1 The defendants “seek the Court’s permission to reserve the right to demand a 

jury trial if discovery reveals an issue for which the Defendants would be entitled to it.” 

(Doc. 27 at 2). The defendants’ ability to obtain a jury trial depends on governing law or 

the plaintiff’s acquiescence. The Court therefore cannot grant the defendants the 

assurance they seek. 

Case 1:15-cv-00134-WS-N Document 30 Filed 07/28/15 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Provident
Financial Group, Inc.'s (known as Provident Bancorp, Inc. until June 2, 1997)
10-Q for September 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         192,119
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               147,437
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,372,667
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      5,105,578
<ALLOWANCE>                                     75,242
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,079,578
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,984,056
<SHORT-TERM>                                   535,751
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            293,995
<LONG-TERM>                                    659,005
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,000
<COMMON>                                        12,346
<OTHER-SE>                                     587,425
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               7,079,578
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                366,223
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               59,105
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   706
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               426,034
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             165,201
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             231,473
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          194,561
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   35,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               4,449
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                150,919
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                130,935
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      85,009
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    85,009
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.95
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.00
<LOANS-NON>                                     36,925
<LOANS-PAST>                                    10,504
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   257
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 29,917
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                66,693
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   36,544
<RECOVERIES>                                     7,777
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               75,242
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            75,242
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Angeles Partners X (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 
|   | /s/Steven D. Cordes     |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name: Steven D. Cordes  |
|   | Date: August 12, 2009   |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/Stephen B. Waters    |
|   | Name: Stephen B. Waters |
|   | Date: August 12, 2009   |

 

This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
1

October 24-25, 2005 Meeting of the NIBS/MMC Committee to Translate the 

NIST World Trade Center Investigation Recommendations Into Building 

Codes And Standards - Agenda

Monday, October 24, 2005 

Noon Informal luncheon 

1:00 p.m. Opening remarks, introductions, agenda 

review 

Brice and Jones 

1:30 p.m. Introduction of the NIST WTC 

investigation and recommendations and 

NIST goals for project 

Sunder 

2:30 p.m. Committee input on current activities 

already addressing the recommendations 

All 

3:15 p.m. Break 

3:30 p.m. Discussion of codes/standards update 

schedules and the committee process for 

assessing recommendations 

All 

4:00 p.m. Preliminary grouping of recommendations 

into: 

(a) those ready for action, 

(b) those requiring additional research or 

other developments before translation into 

codes and standards, and 

(c) those with no direct codes/standards 

implications 

All 

5:00 p.m. Adjourn for day 

 

Tuesday, October 25, 2005 

8:30 a.m. Continental breakfast 

9:00 a.m. Opening remarks Brice and Jones 

9:15 a.m. Review of recommendations ready for 

action 

All 

10:00 a.m. Break 

10:15 a.m. Continuation of discussion All 
2

11:30 a.m. Assignments and schedule for moving 

forward with recommendations ready for 

action 

All 

Noon Lunch 

1:00 p.m. Review of recommendations requiring 

additional research or other developments 

All 

3:00 p.m. Break 

3:15 p.m. Assignments and schedule for 

recommendations requiring additional 

work 

All 

4:15 p.m. Consideration of remaining 

recommendations without direct 

codes/standards implications 

All 

4:45 p.m. Summary of decisions, assignments, and 

schedule and selection of next meeting 

date 

Co-chairs and staff 

5:00 p.m. Adjourn
#### Adela Elow, Respondent, v Christine Svenningsen, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[873 NYS2d 319]

In an action, inter alia, to permanently enjoin the defendants from obstructing an easement, the defendant Christine Svenningsen appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered October 12, 2007, as denied those branches of her motion which were pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the first, second, third, and fifth causes of action of the complaint insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), the complaint must be accorded a liberal construction, the facts as alleged therein must be accepted as true, and the plaintiff must be accorded the benefit of every favorable inference. The court’s function on such a motion is to determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory *(see Leon v Martinez,*84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; *Guggenheimer v Ginz-burg,*43 NY2d 268, 275 [1977]; *Uzzle v Nunzie Ct. Homeowners Assn., Inc.,*55 AD3d 723 [2008]; *Cayuga Partners v 150 Grand,*305 AD2d 527 [2003]).

The complaint, construed liberally, sufficiently pleaded a cause of action to enjoin the obstruction of the plaintiffs easement *(see Sambrook v Sierocki,*53 AD3d 817 [2008]; *Lucas v Kandis,*
      *675303 AD2d 649 [2003]; *Hoeffner v John F. Frank, Inc.,*302 AD2d 428 [2003]; *Papasmiris v Katsos,*262 AD2d 619 [1999]; *Vandoros v Hatzimichalis,*131 AD2d 752 [1987]; *Rahabi v Morrison,*81 AD2d 434, 438 [1981]; *Pagano v Kramer,*25 AD2d 887 [1966], *affd*21 NY2d 910 [1968]). Moreover, for purposes of a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), the plaintiff sufficiently pleaded a cause of action for a permanent injunction, as there allegedly was a “violation of a right presently occurring, or threatened and imminent . . . that the plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law . . . that serious and irreparable injury will result if the injunction is not granted; and . . . that the equities are balanced in the plaintiffs favor” (67A NY Jur 2d, Injunctions § 153; *see Town of Liberty Volunteer Ambulance Corp. v Catskill Regional Med. Ctr.,*30 AD3d 739, 740 [2006]).

A party seeking to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) on the ground that its defense is based on documentary evidence must submit documentary evidence that resolves all factual issues as a matter of law and conclusively disposes of the plaintiffs claim (see *Leon v Martinez,*84 NY2d at 88; *Uzzle v Nunzie Ct. Homeowners Assn., Inc.,*55 AD3d 723 [2008]; *Martin v New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens,*34 AD3d 650 [2006]; *Nevin v Laclede Professional Prods.,*273 AD2d 453 [2000]). The documentary evidence submitted by the appellant in this case failed to resolve all factual issues and did not conclusively dispose of the plaintiffs claim.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Skelos, J.P, Santucci, McCarthy and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
EX 99.3


                         OAKWOOD ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
                          ANNUAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                        OAKWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC.
                  SENIOR/SUBORDINATED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                                  SERIES 1999-C

Pursuant to Section 3.13(a) of the Standard Terms to Pooling and Servicing
Agreement (May 1999 Edition) which is incorporated in the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated June 1, 1999among Oakwood Mortgage Investors, Inc., Oakwood
Acceptance Corporation (the "Servicer") and Chase Manhattan Trust Co., the
undersigned officer of the Servicer hereby certifies that a review of the
activities of the Servicer during the period October 1, 1998 through September
30, 1999 and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has
been made under his supervision and to the best of his knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement through such period.



By:  /s/ Douglas R. Muir
------------------------

Name:  Douglas R. Muir
----------------------

Title: Vice President
------------------------

Date: September 30, 1999
-------------------------
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher Kape, certify
that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual
report on Form 10-KSB of Global Energy Inc.;2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations,
and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small
business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in
the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the
small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small
business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a)all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Christopher KapeChristopher Kape,President
(Principal Executive Officer) andTreasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)

---