alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# DATES AND TIMES:

 January 7, 2015, at 2 p.m.

# PLACE:

Washington, DC, via Teleconference.

# STATUS:

 Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

### Wednesday, January 7, 2015, at 2 p.m.

1. Strategic Issues.

2. Financial Matters.

3. Pricing.

4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.

5. Governors' Executive Session—Discussion of prior agenda items and Board Governance.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC, 20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014-30140 Filed 12-22-14; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BEVERLY L. HEARD 

WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

:

:

:

:

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 14-292-CG-M

:

KENYEN R. BROWN, et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order entered this date, it is ORDERED, 

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT on all claims be entered in 

favor of Defendant, and against Plaintiff. 

DONE and ORDERED this 28th day of April, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00292-CG-M Document 31 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77471-77472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30043]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EF15-2-000]


Western Area Power Administration; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on November 26, 2014, the Western Area Power 
Administration submitted a tariff filing per 10 CFR 903.23: UGP_PSMBP-
ED_WAPA 168-20141117, to be effective 1/1/2015. (Extension of the Pick-
Sloan Missouri Basin Program--Eastern Division Transmission and 
Ancillary Services Rates-Western Area Power Administration-Rate Order 
No. WAPA-168).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

[[Page 77472]]

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c5838097868aaba9acaba096b0b5b5aab7b185a3a0b7a6eba2aab3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c6a697e6f6342404542497f595c5c435e586c4a495e4f024b435a">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on December 26, 2014.

    Dated: December 17, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30043 Filed 12-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1432 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1432

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the 
deductibility of charitable contributions to certain organizations for 
                      members of the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VSO Equal Tax Treatment Act'' or as 
the ``VETT Act''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTIBILITY OF CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS TO CERTAIN 
              ORGANIZATIONS FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) In General.--Section 170(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(6) An organization described in section 501(c)(19) that 
        is a federally chartered corporation.''.
    (b) Percentage Limitation.--Section 170(b)(1)(A) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``or'' at the end of clause 
(viii), by adding ``or'' at the end of clause (ix), and by inserting 
after clause (ix) the following new clause:
                            ``(x) an organization described in section 
                        501(c)(19) that is a federally chartered 
                        corporation,''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1432

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the 
deductibility of charitable contributions to certain organizations for 
                      members of the Armed Forces.
```
Exhibit 10.1

 

HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES TRUST

 

Summary of Trustee Compensation

 

The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the Trustees of Hospitality Properties Trust, or the Company, for services as Trustees, which is subject to modification at any time by the Board of Trustees.

 

·                  Each Independent Trustee receives an annual fee of $40,000, plus a fee of $1,000 for each meeting attended. Up to two $1,000 fees are payable if more than one board and board committee meetings are held on the same date.

 

·                  The chairpersons of the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and governance committee, each of whom is an Independent Trustee, receive an additional annual fee of $12,500, $7,500 and $7,500, respectively.

 

·                  Each Trustee receives a grant of 2,500 of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest on the date of the first board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders (or, for Trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first board meeting attended).

 

·                  The Company generally reimburses all Trustees for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Trustees and for out of pocket costs incurred from their attending certain continuing education programs.
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**







Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-127666 and 333-129426) and Form S-8 (File No.
      333-105557) of Medis Technologies Ltd. of our reports dated March 14, 2006,
      with
      respect to the consolidated financial statements of Medis Technologies Ltd.,
      Medis Technologies Ltd. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal
      control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control
      over
      financial reporting of Medis Technologies Ltd., included in this Annual Report
      on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.








Tel
                Aviv, Israel
            KOST
                FORER GABBAY & KASIERERMarch
                14, 2006
            A
                MEMBER OF ERNST & YOUNG GLOBAL
O n ap p eal , p et i t i o ners d o no t chal l enge t he i m m i grat i o n judge’ s d eni al of t hei r r eq uest f o r vol unt ary wi t hho l d i ng 1 of r e mo v a l u n de r § 24 1( b) ( 3) of t h e I N A a n d f or w i t h h ol di n g u n de r t h e U
. N
. Con v e n t i on Ag a i n s t T or t u r e ( 8 C. F. R. § 12 0 8
. 1 6 (c))
. T h e im m igr a t i o n judge f o cused exc l usi vel y upo n t he cl ai m s ad vanced by M rs . K ri vo no s b ecause she al o ne 2 co nt end s t hat s he suf

f ered p ers ecut i o n b ased upo n po l i t i cal act i vi t y . H er hus b and and da ught er’ s ap p l i cat i o ns are d eriva t i ve o f

he r claim s. NO T REC OM M EN DE D F OR F UL L- TEX T P UB LIC AT ION F ile Nam e: 07a0151n.06 F iled: F ebruary 26, 2007 No. 06-3206 UN ITED STA TES C OU RT OF AP P EA LS F OR THE SI XT H C IR CU IT
ELENA N . KRI VON OS ; V L ADI MI R I . KR I VONO S; DA RIA B . KRIVO NO S, P e ti ti one r s,
v. AL B ERT O R . G ON Z AL ES, Attor ne y Ge ne ra l, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON P ETIT ION FOR REVI EW OF A DECI SI ON OF THE BOARD OF I MMI GRATI ON A P P E A LS MEMORAN DUM OP IN ION

Before: NORRIS, COLE , and CL AY, Circ uit Jud ges . P ER CURIAM . Elena K rivonos, her husba

nd Vl ad i m i r, and daughter Da ria, who a

re citizens of Russi a, appe al the denial by the Boa rd of I mmigration Appeals of their petition for asylum filed pursua

nt to § 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“ I NA”) , 8 U. S
. C
. § 1 1 5 8. The 1 imm ig ratio n ju dg e c on c lud e d that, e ve n if he c re dit e d Mr s. Kr ivo no s’ te sti mony , sh e ha d f a ile d to 2

e sta bli she ith e r t

hat sh e su ff

e re d p a st p e rs e c uti on

ba se d u po n h e r p oli tic a l a c tiv iti e s o r h a d a we ll-No. 06-3206

Krivonos v. Gonzales

- 2 - founded f ear of future perse cution (or torture ) upon re patriatio n t o Ru s s i a. The B I A af firmed the denial of r elief. As with many

individuals who come bef ore us se ekingperma

nent re sidency

in the United States, we a

re sy mpathetic to the s ituation of t he Krivonos family and their desire to make a new life in this country . Acc ording ly , we have reviewe d the briefs of t he parties and the administ rative r ecor d below with g reat car e. We conc lude that petitioners have not made the r equisite showing to justi fy relief on any of the theor ies that they

have a dvance d. Be cause the re asons for our decision we re adequately

articulated by

the immigration judge in his oral decision dated August 25, 2004, and by the B I A i n it s Jan

ua ry 18 , 2 00 6 o rd e r a do pti ngand a ff ir min g tha t de c isi on , a

de ta ile d opin ion by

thi s court would ser

ve no usef

ul purpose. Th e de c isi on

of the B oa rd of I mmi g ratio n App e a ls i s aff irm ed
.
EXHIBIT 8.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF MATERIALISE NV



|                                     |  |                              
|------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Name                                 |  | Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
|Materialise France SAS               |  | France                       
|Materialise GmbH                     |  | Germany                      
|Materialise Japan K.K.               |  | Japan                        
|Materialise Czech Republic SRO       |  | The Czech Republic           
|Materialise USA, LLC                 |  | USA  Michigan               
|Materialise UK Limited               |  | United Kingdom               
|OBL SAS                              |  | France                       
|Materialise Austria GmbH             |  | Austria                      
|Materialise Malaysia SDN. Bhd.       |  | Malaysia                     
|Materialise Ukraine LLC              |  | Ukraine                      
|RapidFit NV                          |  | Belgium                      
|RapidFit, LLC                        |  | USA  Michigan               
|Materialise SA                       |  | Poland                       
|Meridian Technique Limited           |  | United Kingdom               
|OrthoView, LLC                       |  | USA  Delaware               
|OrthoView Holdings Ltd.              |  | United Kingdom               
|Meridian (Corporate Trustee) Limited |  | United Kingdom               
|OrthoView Limited                    |  | United Kingdom               
|Materialise Colombia SAS             |  | Colombia                     
|RSPRINT powered by Materialise NV    |  | Belgium                      
|Materialise Shanghai Co. Ltd.        |  | China                        
|Materialise Australia PTY Ltd        |  | Australia                    
|Materialise S.R.L.                   |  | Italy
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-041 

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JAMES MICHAEL PARKER, 

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

there being no objection from the State, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 26, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 22 2022

12/22/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0041
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6646
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROLAND R. CHILDRESS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-92-97, CA-96-692) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 25, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roland R. Childress, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Childress , Nos. CR-92-97; CA-96-692 (E.D. Va. Apr. 7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
TRACE K. UNDEMAN CLE%0IBUPREME COURT 

### ORDER BY DEPUTY CLERK Docket No. 66563 is an appeal from district court orders IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ENTRY-MASTER, LLC, Appellant, vs. PARKING AND SECURITY SYSTEMS, LLC, 

### Respondent. ENTRY-MASTER, LLC, Appellant, vs. PARKING AND SECURITY SYSTEMS, LLC, Res s ondent. ENTRY-MASTER, LLC, Appellant, vs. PARKING AND SECURITY SYSTEMS, LLC; AND ROBERT KATZ, RECEIVER, Respondents. No. 66563 ""

No. 67682

No. 69304 

# FILED

JAN 1 9 2016

entered September 19, 2014, granting declaratory judgment and ordering the dissolution of appellant and appointing a receiver. See NRAP 3A(b)(4). Docket No. 67682 is an appeal from the order awarding attorney fees and costs. These two appeals have been consolidated. Docket No. 69304 is an appeal from a subsequent district court order granting the receiver's motion to approve fees and costs and conclude the receivership. The receiver has filed a stipulation to dismiss the appeals in all three dockets. Appellant challenges that stipulation with a "Motion to Strike or in the Alternative Opposition," objecting that the receiver himself cannot dismiss the appeals that challenge the validity of his own

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 

### e /6-01711

# pt , J.

appointment. The receiver and respondent Parking and Security Systems, LLC, have responded, and appellant has filed a reply. Having considered these documents, we deny the motion to strike the stipulation in Docket Nos. 66563 and 67682. The stipulation of dismissal is approved to the following extent. These appeals are dismissed without prejudice.

We grant the motion to strike the stipulation in Docket No. 69304, and this appeal shall continue. The clerk of this court shall strike the stipulation filed on December 14, 2015. We remind appellant that the opening brief and appendix remain due on or before April 6, 2016. 1

It is so ORDERED. 2

Hardesty 

# Oda &

Saitta Pickering

'In our resolution of the instant matters, we express no opinion as to the merits of the underlying orders that are the subject of these appeals.

2 We deny appellant's motion to strike the notice of appearance of counsel for the receiver.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947Acc: Hon. Lidia Stiglich, District Judge Kauffman and Forman, P.A. Fox Rothschild, LLP, Las Vegas Oshinski & Forsberg, Ltd. Pascale Stevens LLC Parsons Behle & Latimer/Reno Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A me 3
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00427-CR

June G. Lopez a/k/a 

June G. Mishler

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 4

of Tarrant County (1203668D)

April 11, 2013

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of HealthExtras, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                                     
|----------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|February 28, 2008 |  | /s/ DAVID T. BLAIR                  
|                  |  | David T. Blair                      
|                  |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
|                  | 
|                  |  | /s/ Michael P. Donovan              
|                  |  | Michael P. Donovan                  
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer and         
|                  |  | Chief Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         120,378
<SECURITIES>                                    39,789
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,932
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,354
<INVENTORY>                                     16,743
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               212,402
<PP&E>                                           2,728
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 213,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,894
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                     181,593
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   213,498
<SALES>                                        133,522
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,522
<CGS>                                           56,612
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,174
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,886)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,622
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,872
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,872
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20


</TABLE>