alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5


<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                             66,625
<SECURITIES>                       1,102,000
<RECEIVABLES>                      723,816
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        176,871
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   2,235,219
<PP&E>                             510,565
<DEPRECIATION>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     18,557,165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              9,490,946
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                           15,953
<OTHER-SE>                         5,445,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       18,557,165
<SALES>                            3,734,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   3,734,000
<CGS>                              4,508,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      672,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (1,447,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (1,447,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       (1,447,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                        (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (.10)



</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1983 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health 

and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National Eye Institute for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National Eye Institute for fiscal year 

2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1983 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV3 ICES, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH NA4 TIONAL EYE INSTITUTE FOR FISCAL YEAR 

5 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Department of Health and Human Services, Na9 tional Institutes of Health National Eye Institute for fis10 cal year 2024 may not exceed $796,536,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 11.1
                        FIDUCIARY CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.

                         STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET
                          INVESTMENT INCOME PER LIMITED
                                PARTNERSHIP UNIT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             For the Three Months         For the Nine Months
                                             Ended September 30,          Ended September 30,
                                             --------------------         -------------------
                                              1995         1994           1995        1994
                                              ----         ----           ----        ----

<S>                                        <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>       
Net Investment Income                      $  592,903    $  521,735    $1,708,266    $1,522,001

Percentage Allocable to Limited Partners           99%           99%           99%           99%
                                           ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------

Net Investment Income Allocable
   to Limited Partners                     $  586,974    $  516,518    $1,691,183    $1,506,781
                                           ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========

Weighted Average Number of Limited
   Partnership Units Outstanding            1,526,949     1,687,121     1,526,949     1,687,121
                                           ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========

Net Investment Income Per Limited
   Partnership Unit                        $      .38    $      .30    $     1.11    $      .89
                                           ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========
</TABLE>
2015 Q2 CEC Ex 10.4 Letter Agreement








Exhibit 10.4


February 4, 2015


Gary W. Loveman
c/o Caesars Entertainment Corporation
One Caesars Palace Drive
Las Vegas, NV     89109    United States


Dear Gary,
This letter will confirm the agreement that Caesars Entertainment Corporation (“CEC”) has reached with you regarding the impact of the expected employment of Mark Frissora as Chief Executive Officer Designate of CEC, commencing February 5, 2015, and his expected transition to Chief Executive Officer and President of CEC on July 1, 2015, upon your employment agreement dated December 14, 2014, with CEC, Caesar Enterprise Services, LLC (“CES”), and for certain purposes specified therein, Caesars Acquisition Company (“CAC”) (the “Employment Agreement”).  For purposes of this letter, you, CEC, CES and CAC are sometimes collectively referred to as the “Parties” and capitalized terms shall have the meaning given to them in your Employment Agreement unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
Notwithstanding any provisions in your Employment Agreement to the contrary, if at any time after the date of this letter and prior to December 31, 2016, you cease to be the Chief Executive Officer and President of CEC (other than through a termination of your employment by CEC for Cause), and which you and CEC agree is not currently scheduled to occur until July 1, 2015, then you may, at your option and without further action by or consent of the Parties, resign all of your positions with CEC, CES, CAC and Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, effective as of any date of your choosing, as long as you provide CEC with at least thirty (30) days written notice of your resignation and specify the effective date of your separation from service, it being the understanding of the Parties, that your separation shall be no earlier than July 31, 2015 or an earlier date mutually agreed between you and CEC.  Upon any such separation from service you shall be entitled to the cash compensation, the rights under the Caesars Plans, and the other employee benefits and fringe benefits as described in Sections 7.1 and 8.2 of your Employment Agreement as if your employment had been terminated by CEC without Cause or by you for Good Reason as described in Section 8.1 of the Employment Agreement, and subject to the Release Condition described therein. 
Except as otherwise stated in this letter, the Employment Agreement and your equity awards under the Caesars Plans shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their terms.

1






Sincerely,




_/s/ Mary H. Thomas_______________
Mary H. Thomas


Title: Executive Vice President, Human Resources


Caesars Entertainment Corporation






Acknowledged and accepted




_/s/ Gary W. Loveman______________
Gary W. Loveman






Caesars Enterprise Services, LLC




By: _/s/ Mary H. Thomas____________
       Mary. H. Thomas


Its: Executive Vice President, Human Resources






Caesars Acquisition Company




By: ___/s/ Michael D. Cohen__________


Its: __Corporate Secretary____________



2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0647

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DERRELL RUSSELL DOWD,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 30, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 22 2022

04/22/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0647
Exhibit 32.2

BULOVA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John D. Stanton, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John D. StantonJohn D. StantonPrincipal Financial Officer
May 21, 2010
No. 87-56.

#### Owens et al. *v.*Okure.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Maureen D. Howley, Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing
Owner), of World Monitor Trust II  Series E (the Fund), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Funds Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Maureen D. Howley                          
|Maureen D. Howley                              
|Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President
|September 16, 2005
10112.

#### Pinion *v.*Henry *et al.*

Decided January 20, 1921.

Action ' for damages; from Bartow superior court — Judge Tarver.. July 8, 1918.

*A. Hi-Davis, Paul F. Alcin,*for plaintiff.

' *Watt H. Milner,*for defendants.

Stephens, J.

1. A non-resident of the State having been made a party defendant to the bill of exceptions in this case, and served as provided in the Civil Code (1910), § 6161, the motion to dismiss the writ of error is overruled.

2. This case is otherwise controlled by the answer of the Supreme Court to a certified question. *Pinion*v. *Henry,*150 *Ga.*595 (104 S. E. 427).

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Hill, J., eoneur.*
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of LIFE ENERGY & TECHNOLOGY  HOLDINGS
INC. (the  "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending  November 30, 2002, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  Michael  Liberatore,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael Liberatore
-----------------------------
Michael Liberatore
Chief Financial Officer
January 20, 2003
EXHIBIT 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the annual report of Internet Gold-Golden Lines Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Doron Turgeman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Doron Turgeman*


Doron Turgeman


Chief Executive Officer




April 27, 2015




*           The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.





This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.00

                                 NETEGRITY, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)

                      (In thousands, except per share data)



                                                       Three months ended
                                                          September 30,
                                                       1999           1998
                                                       ----           ----

BASIC AND DILUTED:

Average Common shares outstanding                      10,576         9,398

Net loss                                              $(1,689)      $(1,147)

Per share amount                                      $ (0.16)      $ (0.12)



                                                        Nine months ended
                                                          September 30,
                                                       1999           1998
                                                       ----           ----

BASIC AND DILUTED:

Average Common shares outstanding                      10,273         9,348

Net loss                                              $(4,478)      $(3,960)

Per share amount                                      $ (0.44)      $ (0.42)



                                       37
11980.

#### NATIONAL CASH REGISTER CO. *v.*HENDERSON FURNITURE CO.

Waiver of fraud in the procurement of tlie original contract, by executing the new contract with knowledge of that fraud, did not prevent rescission for fraud in the procurement of the latter contract.

Decided April 14, 1921.

Attachment; from Colquitt superior court — Judge Thomas. November 9, 1920.

*Dowling & AsJcew,*for plaintiff. *Hill & Gibson,*for defendant.

Hill, J.

The defendant bought from the plaintiff a cash-register on express warranty that it would give certain definite results. He made a cash payment and gave his notes for the balance of the purchase-price. On receipt of the register it was found to be defective in its physical construction, and would not perform the particular kind of work demanded by the defendant and which at the time of the purchase the plaintiff represented it would perform. The plaintiff admitted these defects and entered into a new contract with the defendant to furnish another register of exactly the kind described by the defendant as necessary to his business. Relying upon these statements made to him by the plaintiff, the defendant agreed to the second contract. When the second register was delivered to the defendant for use, he discovered, after thoroughly testing it, that the representations and statements of the plaintiff as to the efficiency of the register to perform the work demanded were false and fraudulent. When the defendant discovered that the second contract had been secured from him by these false and fraudulent representations he promptly *713tendered the register back to the plaintiff, while it was in the condition in which he had received it, and demanded the return of the cash paid as the initial payment on the first contract, and a rescission of the second contract. The plaintiff refused compliance with the defendant’s demand, and brought suit on the purchase-money notes executed at the time of the purchase of the first register. The defendant filed an answer, setting up substantially the facts stated above and assumed the burden, and the verdict was in his favor. The plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds alone, was overruled.

The court did not err in overruling the motion. The principle that even if there had been fraud in the procurement of the first contract, it was waived by the defendant when he executed the second contract with knowledge of its existence has no application, because here fraud is also alleged in connection with procurement of the second contract.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Jenkins, *P. J., and*Stephens, *J., concur.*
### NUMBER 13
- 17
- 00 683
- CR


## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ FELICIANO CRUZ , A PPELLANT ,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A PPELLEE

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 214 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides Order Per Curiam

This matter is before the Court on appellant’s motion to abate appeal, extend time for brief, and supplement record. The reporter’s record was filed on February 28, 2018. Appellant has advised this Court that the record do es not contain a hearing on the motion for new trial. Appellant requests the deadline for filing appellant’s brief be extended until after the reporter’s record is supplemented.2

When a relevant item has been omitted from the reporter’s record, t he appellate court may by letter direct the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a supplemental reporter’s record containing the omitted items. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.6(d). Accordingly, appellant’s motion to supplement the reporter’s record is GRANTED and the appeal is ABATED. The court reporter of the 214 th District Court of Nueces County is directed to

prepare a supplemental reporter’s record in this cause to include the hearing on the
motion for new trial held in trial court cause number 16CR

- 2706

- F

. The supplemental
record shall be filed with this Court within thirty days from the date of this order. Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED. Th e appeal
will be reinstated upon receipt of the supplemental reporter’s record and upon further
order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed th e 7th day of August , 201 8

.
O pinion filed January 3 , 201 4



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

___ ___ _____ 

### No. 11

- 1 3

- 00 231

- C V

____ __ _____ 

### IN THE INTEREST OF A.L.M. AND J.J.A

. , CHILD REN

On Appeal from the 161st District Court
Ector County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. B

- 3219

- PC

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This is an appeal from an order terminatin g the parental rights of the mother and the fathers of A.L.M. and J.J.A. The mother filed a notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.
The mother’s court

- appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a supporting brief in which she professionally and conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and states that s he has concluded that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel has provided the mother with a copy of the motion to wi thdraw
and brief and advised the mother of her right to review the record and file a2 response to counsel’s brief. The mother has not filed a response. 1 Court

- appoin ted counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
, and In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). In this regard, the practice recognized in Anders for court

- appointed counsel to seek a withdrawal from a frivolous appeal applies to parental termination proceedings involving appointed counsel. See In re K.D. , 127 S.W.3d 66, 67 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.). Following the procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman , we have independently reviewed the record, and we agree that the appeal is without merit
and should be dismissed. Schulman , 252 S.W.3d at 409. Co urt

- appointed
counsel’s motion to withdraw is grant ed

. Additionally, we order counsel to notify
the mother of the disposition of this appeal and the availability of discretionary
review in the Texas Supreme Court . Counsel is directed to send the mother a copy of the opinion and judgment within five days after the opinion is handed down, along with notification of her right to file a pro se petition for review under T EX

. R.
A PP

. P . 53. Likewise, this court advises the mother that she may file a petition for review pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 53.
The mot ion to withdraw is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

January 3 , 201 4
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J. , and Bailey, J.

1 By letter, this c ourt granted the mother more than thirty days in which to exercise her right to file a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw and brief.