alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Nancy Chineze Nwawka, Petitioner, v Désiré Badibady Yamutuale, Respondent. Jennifer M. Lorenz, Attorney for the Child, Appellant.

[967 NYS2d 548]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M. Lo Vallo, J.), entered July 11, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Domestic Relations Law article 5-A. The order, inter alia, denied the petition of petitioner to suspend visitation.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: The Attorney for the Child (AFC) appeals from that part of an order denying the petition in which petitioner mother sought to suspend all unsupervised visitation between the parties’ child and respondent father and sought an award of sole custody of the child. After a hearing, Family Court, inter alia, denied the petition, reinstated visitation between the father and the child according to the schedule set forth in the parties’ divorce decree, and ordered that the father and the child engage in joint counseling.

*1457Contrary to the contention of the AFC, the court properly denied the petition and reinstated visitation between the father and the child. “[Visitation with the noncustodial parent is presumed to be in the child’s best interests . . ., and . . . denial of visitation is justified only for a compelling reason” *(Matter of Carter v Work,*100 AJD3d 1557, 1557 [2012]). Based upon our review of the record, including the child’s statements at the *Lincoln*hearing *(see Matter of Lincoln v Lincoln,*24 NY2d 270, 272-274 [1969]), we conclude that the court’s determination has a sound and substantial basis, and we decline to disturb it *(see generally Matter of Klee v Schill,*95 AD3d 1599, 1601-1602 [2012]). Specifically, we conclude that the record supports the court’s findings that the mother “has sought to alienate this child from her father” by blaming the father for an incident of alleged sexual abuse perpetrated against the child by a third party, and that the father was not in any way responsible for the occurrence of that alleged crime. The actions of the mother have damaged the father’s relationship with the child, and thus we also conclude that the record supports the court’s determination to order joint counseling sessions involving the child and the father for the purpose of restoring their relationship *(see Carter,*100 AD3d at 1557). Moreover, “the record suggests that the child’s opposition to visitation was the product, at least in part, of parental alienation by the mother” *(id.*at 1557-1558). Based on the foregoing, we conclude that the court properly determined that the child’s best interests would be served by denying the petition *(see generally Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167, 171-174 [1982]). Present — Centra, J.P., Fahey, Bindley, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MICHAEL WRIGHT, :

Respondent, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 05-0395-BH-C

WILLIE THOMAS, :

Respondent. :

ORDER

After due and proper considerationof allportions ofthisfile deemed relevant to the issues raised,

and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendationofthe Magistrate Judge made

under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this

action be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to obey the Court's

order.

DONE this 26th day of September, 2005.

 

 W. B. HAND

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00395-BH-C Document 5 Filed 09/26/05 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1909 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1909

 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Joint Items, 
          Library Buildings and Grounds for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Joint Items, 
          Library Buildings and Grounds for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR JOINT ITEMS, LIBRARY 
              BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Joint Items, Library 
Buildings and Grounds for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $64,544,000.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of EXCO Resources, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge,
that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



|                  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                  |  | 
|Date: May 6, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ DOUGLAS H. MILLER  
|                  |  |  |  | Douglas H. Miller      
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                  |  | 
|                  |  |  |  | /s/ J. DOUGLAS RAMSEY  
|                  |  |  |  | J. Douglas Ramsey      
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as President and Chief Executive Officer of BTU International, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 4, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods
covered by the Report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Paul J. van der WansemPaul J. van der WansemPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (principal executive officer)


Dated: May 5, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form 10-QSB of Kent Financial Services, Inc. for the nine months ended September
30,  1996  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  refrence  to such  financial
statements ($000 omitted, except per share data).
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000316028       
<NAME>                        KENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         7,381
<SECURITIES>                                   7,674
<RECEIVABLES>                                    400
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              15,455
<PP&E>                                         2,061
<DEPRECIATION>                                   778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                17,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,248
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         105
<OTHER-SE>                                    13,686
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  17,039
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,717
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,252
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               171
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,294
<INCOME-TAX>                                     339
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              955
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     955
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .91
        


</TABLE>
[Exhibit 32.2]

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of BF Acquisition Group
II, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Colucci,
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 26, 2004

                             /s/ William Colucci
                             ----------------------------------
                             William Colucci, Treasurer
                             BF Acquisition Group II, Inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

TRACY ALLEN, : 

 Plaintiff, : 

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 08-00227-WS-B 

ISAAC MOODY, et al., : 

 

 Defendants. : 

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff=s Complaint 

be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. 

DONE this 24th day of August, 2010. 

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Case 1:08-cv-00227-WS-B Document 120 Filed 08/24/10 Page 1 of 1
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 09-0309

IN RE  JOSEPH CHARLES RUBIOLA A/K/A J.C. RUBIOLA, GREGORY ALLAN RUBIOLA, CATHERINE RUBIOLA, JGL DESIGN-BUILD, LLC A/K/A JGL DESIGN BUILD AND MICHAEL CORTEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A THE HEIGHTS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.All trial court proceedings in Cause No. 2008-CI-13072, styled *Brian Salmon and Christina Salmon vs. Joseph Charles Rubiola a/k/a J.C. Rubiola, Catherine Rubiola, JGL Design-Build, LLC a/k/a JGL Design Build and Michael Cortez, individually and d/b/a The Heights Design and Construction*, in the 131st District Court of Bexar County, Texas, are stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.

Done at the City of Austin, this May 15, 2009.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
#### Henry Minnis *v.*Commonwealth.

Intoxicating Liquor — Sale of.

A defendant charged with the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors is not permitted to prove that before the sale was made it was the opinion of his employer thati such a sale was legal.

Practice — Exceptions.

Where no exceptions were taken to the action of the court in giving and refusing to give instructions, the record cannot be so amended by agreement of attorneys to show that such exceptions were taken.

Bill of Exceptions.

An original bill of exceptions cannot be made up after the expiration of the term unless there is an order of court giving time for that ■ purpose. The court loses all power in the matter unless it be the power to correct the bill so as to make it conform to the record.

APPEAL FROM FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT.

September 23, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The circuit court did not err in refusing to admit evidence as to opinions expressed to the defendant or his employer, to the effect that he might retail liquors without subjecting himself to the penalties denounced by law against those engaging in such business, without first obtaining authority so to do.

The record as originally made up, does not show that the action of.the court in giving and refusing instructions was excepted to at the time. After the case had been brought to this court, and argued by counsel, the record in the circuit court was, by agreement, so corrected as to show that exceptions were regularly taken; and this amended record has been filed in this court, subject to objections made at the time by the attorney-general.

It is not pretended that there is or was anything in the. record upon which this correction could be founded. It was evidently made from the recollection of the attorneys and the judge. An original bill of exceptions cannot be made up after the expiration of the term, unless there is an order of court giving time 'for that purpose. Neither can the bill be amended after the expiration of the term. The court loses all power in the matter, unless it be the power to correct the bill so as to make it conform to the record; and we do not decide, that it has that power. Nor do we think the consent of the parties authorized the correction in this case.

*496
      *H. M. Buford, Breckenridge & Morton, for appellant.*

*John Rodman, for appellee.*

After the appeal has been prosecuted to this court, the attorney-general became, by operation of law, the representative of the commonwealth, and we are of opinion, that the attorney for the commonwealth, in the circuit court, could not bind him by an agreement to change the record upon which the appeal was prosecuted.

We must, therefore, decide that the amended transcript filed June 19, 1875, is not properly a part of the record.

This conclusion necessitates an *affirmance*of the judgment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          36,464
<SECURITIES>                                 1,455,398
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,237
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,561,893
<PP&E>                                          74,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,465,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,409
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        94,483
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,334,759
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,465,300
<SALES>                                        130,653
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               418,538
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                85,964
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                332,574
<INCOME-TAX>                                    73,888
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            258,686
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   258,686
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60783 Summary Calendar

LUCIA LOPEZ DE RUIZ Petitioner

v. MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A90 744 688
Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Lucia Lopez de Ruiz (Ruiz) seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) rejecting her claim for relief under former § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The BIA concluded that Ruiz’s prior conviction for fraud did not have a statutory counterpart in § 212(a), relying on 8 C.F.R. § 1212.3(f)(5), and In re Blake , 23 I. & N. Dec. 722 (BIA 2005), petition for reviewgranted & remanded, Blakev. Carbone , 489 F.3d 88, 91 (2d Cir. 2007). United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 21, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 05-60783

2 Ruiz argues that Blake and its interpretation of § 1212.3(f)(5) is incompatible with INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 (2001); violates the constitutional doctrines of equal protection, due process, and separation of powers; is inconsistent with statutory language and Supreme Court precedent; and is inconsistent with the BIA’s prior practice. She further challenges the determination that fraud is not a crime involving moral turpitude for purposes of § 212(c) relief. In light of our decisions in Vo v. Gonzales, 482 F.3d 363 (5th Cir. 2007), and Avilez-Granadosv. Gonzales, 481 F.3d 869, 871-72 (5th Cir. 2007), we reject Ruiz’s claims. The petition for review is DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DIANE G. MELECH, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) 

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO: 10-0573-KD-M

) 

LIFE	INSURANCE	COMPANY	OF )

NORTH	AMERICA,	PENSION	AND	 )

WELFARE	PLAN	ADMINISTRATION	 )

COMMITTEE	– THE	HERTZ	 )

CORPORATION,	HERTZ	CUSTOM	 )

BENEFIT	PROGRAM,	AND	THE	HERTZ )

CORPORATION, )

)

Defendants.	 )

JUDGMENT

In	accordance	with	the	Order	entered	this	date	granting	summary	judgment	

in	favor	of	defendants,	it	is	hereby ORDERED,	ADJUDGED	and DECREED that	the	

claims	of	plaintiff	Diane	G.	Melech	against	defendants Life	Insurance	Company	of	

North	America,	Pension	and	Welfare	Plan	Administration	Committee	– The	Hertz	

Corporation,	Hertz	Custom	Benefit	Program,	and	the	Hertz	Corporation,	are	

DISMISSED	with	prejudice.

Pursuant	to	Rule	58	of	the	Federal	Rules	of	Civil	Procedure,	judgment	is	

hereby	entered	in	favor	of	defendants and	against	plaintiff	Diane	G.	Melech.	

DONE and ORDERED this the 18th day of September, 2012.

s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00573-KD-M Document 163 Filed 09/18/12 Page 1 of 1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2028 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 

Education, Higher Education for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Education, Higher Education for fiscal year 

2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, HIGHER EDU5 CATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:15 Apr 15, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2028.IH H2028

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2028 IH

1 able for Department of Education, Higher Education for 

2 fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $0. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1880 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of Representatives, Allowance for Compensation of Interns in House Appropriations 

Committee Offices for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House 

of Representatives, Allowance for Compensation of Interns in House Appropriations Committee Offices for 

fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1880 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, ALLOWANCE 

3 FOR COMPENSATION OF INTERNS IN HOUSE 

4 APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE OFFICES FOR 

5 FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for House of Representatives, Allowance for Com9 pensation of Interns in House Appropriations Committee 

10 Offices for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $345,584. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS