alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ronald Lee SUNKINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lonnie SAUNDERS, Warden, Augusta Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 00-7614.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 8, 2001.

Decided May 21, 2001.

*131Ronald Lee Sunkins, pro se.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Lee Sunkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Sunkins’ notice of appeal was not timely filed.

In civil cases in which the United States is not a party, parties are accorded thirty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, *see*Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on April 1, 1998. Sunkins’ notice of appeal was filed on October 18, 2000.* Because Sunkins failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 This is Sunkins’ second appeal in this matter. His first appeal was dismissed by this court on Februaty 17, 1999. *See Sunkins v. Saunders,*No. 98-6697, 1999 WL 134205 (4th Cir. Feb. 17, 1999) (unpublished).
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1874 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1874

   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of 
      Representatives, Republican Conference for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of 
      Representatives, Republican Conference for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR HOUSE OF 
              REPRESENTATIVES, REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 
              2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for House of Representatives, 
Republican Conference for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $2,186,819.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio PACHECO-ADAME, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-10531.

D.C. No. CR-00-00042-ECR.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, *2001*
      *1*
      *.*

Decided May 30, 2001.

Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

Julio Pacheco-Adame appeals the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea for illegal entry of a deported alien. Pacheco-Adame contends that in light of *Apprendi v. New*Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), it is illegal to impose a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) based upon a prior felony not pled in the indictment nor admitted as part of the plea. PachecoAdame also contends that *Apprendi*renders inapplicable *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a sentencing factor and not a separate offense), because he did not admit to an aggravated felony at his plea hearing. His arguments are foreclosed by this court’s recent decision in *United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda,*234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), *amended*(Feb.8, 2001) (order). *United States v. Castillo Rivera,*244 F.3d 1020, 1024-1025 (9th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
11636.

#### Blakeney *v.*Franklin.

Jenkins, P. J.

1. Garnishment, under the Georgia statutes, while ancillary to the main suit to the extent that judgment cannot be rendered against the garnishee until after judgment against the main defendant has been obtained, is nevertheless in itself a distinct suit between the plaintiff and the garnishee, requiring separate and independent process and judgment. *Dent*v. *Dent,*118 *Ga.*853 (45 S. E. 680) ; *Ahrens*v. *Patten Co.,*94 *Ga.*247, 250 (21 S. E. 523); *Woods*v. *Mass. Mills,*17 *Ga. App.*422 (87 S. E. 688); *Lamb*v. *Whitman,*17 *Ga. App.*687 (87 S. E. 1095) ; *Jones*v. *Maril,*19 *Ga. App.*216(1) (91 S. E. 445).

2. Process of garnishment thus being a suit within the intent and meaning of sections 3166 and 3167 of the Civil Code (1910), which provide for suit, entry of judgment, and issue of execution against partners “ in the firm name ” or “ against a firm,” and provide for judgment against the firm binding all the firm assets and the individual property of the partner served, and section 3190 of the Civil Code further providing that the interest of a partner may be reached by process of garnishment served on the firm, a judgment against a named partnership composed of named individuals, in a garnishment proceeding so maintained, was good and binding not only as to the firm assets of the partnership, but as to the individual property of any partner who had been thus served, and an execution following the terms of such judgment was. leviable on the individual property of such a partner. *Hollister*v. *Bluthenthal,*9 *Ga. App.*176(1) (70 S. E. 970; *Taylor*v. *Felder,*3 *Ga. App.*106 (59 S. E. 398) ; *Page*v. *Citizens Bkg. Co.,*111 *Ga.*73, 79 *306(36 S. E. 418, 78 Am. St. R. 144, 51 L. R. A. 463, and notes); *Parler*v. *Johnson,*81 *Ga.*254 (7 S. E. 317); *Ells*v. *Bone,*71 *Ga.*466, 469; *Ferry*v. *Mattox,*2 *Ga. App.*104 (58 S. E. 291); *Griffin*v. *Colonial Bank,*7 *Ga. App.*126 (66 S. E. 382); *Loyd*v. *Hicks,*31 *Ga.*140(3), 142.

Decided February 15, 1921.

Affidavit of illegality; from city court of Valdosta — Judge Cranford. May 21, 1920.

*Whitaker & Dukes,*for plaintiff in error.

*Franklin*cd *Langdale,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Stephens and Bill, JJ., concur.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1960]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

*Whereas,*                     the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 CFR 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of zones;                

*Whereas,*                     the Port of Corpus Christi Authority, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 122, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket B-51-2014, docketed 07-18-2014) for authority to expand the service area of the zone to include Refugio County, Texas, as described in the application, adjacent to the Corpus Christi Customs and Border Protection port of entry;                

*Whereas,*                     notice inviting public comment was given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (79 FR 43391, 07-25-2014) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                

*Whereas,*                     the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied;                

*Now, therefore,*                     the Board hereby orders:                

The application to reorganize FTZ 122 to expand the service area under the ASF is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the zone.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of December 2014.

Paul Piquado,

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:

 Andrew McGilvray,

 Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-29927 Filed 12-19-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1872 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of 

Representatives, Office of the Majority Whip for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House 

of Representatives, Office of the Majority Whip for fiscal 

year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, OFFICE OF 

5 THE MAJORITY WHIP FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:43 Apr 13, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1872.IH H1872

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1872 IH

1 able for House of Representatives, Office of the Majority 

2 Whip for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $2,197,163. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 74782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29376]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express Negotiated Service 
Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Effective date: December 16, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 9, 2014, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail 
Express Contract 23 to Competitive Product List. Documents are 
available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2015-16, CP2015-20.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Requirements.
[FR Doc. 2014-29376 Filed 12-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              36
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       14
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      50
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,584
<BONDS>                                            525
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,060)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        50
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    95
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        1
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  83
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     11
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 11
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        11
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       11
        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1827 

To prohibit the National Institutes of Health from conducting or supporting 

certain gain-of-function research, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2023 

Mr. CARTER of Georgia (for himself, Mr. CUELLAR, and Mr. GALLAGHER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the National Institutes of Health from conducting or supporting certain gain-of-function research, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pausing Enhanced 

5 Pandemic Pathogen Research Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1827 IH

1 SEC. 2. NO CONDUCT OR SUPPORT BY NIH OF GAIN-OF2 FUNCTION RESEARCH. 

3 Part A of title IV of the Public Health Service Act 

4 (42 U.S.C. 281 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 404P. GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH. 

7 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—During the period ending on 

8 March 30, 2028, the National Institutes of Health shall 

9 not conduct or support, directly or indirectly, including 

10 through subgrants, any gain-of-function research. 

11 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION.—This section does not apply to 

12 characterization or testing of any naturally occurring in13 fluenza virus or coronavirus, unless the characterization 

14 or testing could increase pathogenicity or transmissibility. 

15 ‘‘(c) GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH DEFINED.—In 

16 this section, the term ‘gain-of-function research’ means 

17 any research that could enhance the transmissibility, 

18 virulence, or pathogenicity of any pathogen (whether or 

19 not classified as a pathogen of pandemic potential) or non20 pathogen agent in a way that could result in one or more 

21 of the following: 

22 ‘‘(1) The pathogen or agent becoming mod23 erately or highly transmissible, virulent, or patho24 genic in human populations. 

25 ‘‘(2) The pathogen or agent causing significant 

26 morbidity or mortality in humans. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 1827 IH

1 ‘‘(3) The pathogen or agent posing a severe 

2 threat to public health, the capacity of public health 

3 systems, or the national security of the United 

4 States.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 30, 2021

t0623 

# Order

Clerk June 30, 2021

162169

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 162169

COA: 353987

Oakland CC: 2016

- 258257

- FC

ROBERT LEE DENNIS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 3, 2020

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because th e defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
[Exhibit 32.1]

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of BF Acquisition Group
II,  Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending
April  30,  2001  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Colucci,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and
          (2)  The  information contained in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 16, 2004
                                   /s/ William Colucci
                                   ------------------------------
                                   William Colucci, President
                                   BF Acquisition Group II, Inc.
EX-4.1




 Exhibit 4.1 
  

			
	 Number CS-            
		 *                *
Shares
 Common Stock


 ENDOCHOICE HOLDINGS, INC. 

a Delaware Corporation 

Incorporated on             , 2015 

Common Stock 
 Par Value:
$0.001 
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT              is the record holder of
                     (                ) shares of Common Stock
of EndoChoice Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder, in person, or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this certificate properly
endorsed or assigned. 
 This certificate and the shares represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions of
the Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the Corporation and any amendments thereto, all of which the holder of this certificate, by acceptance hereof, assents. 

A statement of all of the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to or imposed upon the respective classes or series of
stock of the Corporation and upon the holders thereof may be obtained by any stockholder without charge upon request delivered to the secretary of the Corporation at the principal office of the Corporation. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers this      day
of             , 2015. 
  

					
	  
				  

	 President
				Secretary









 FOR VALUE RECEIVED
                                         
    HEREBY SELLS, ASSIGNS AND TRANSFERS UNTO
                                         
                   
                                         SHARES
REPRESENTED BY THE WITHIN CERTIFICATE AND DOES HEREBY IRREVOCABLY CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT
                                     ATTORNEY TO TRANSFER THE SAID
SHARES ON THE SHARE REGISTER OF THE WITHIN NAMED CORPORATION WITH FULL POWER OF SUBSTITUTION IN THE PREMISES. 
  

					
	
DATED                        

				
					  

					(Signature)

 NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE ON THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY
PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,058
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,907)
<INVENTORY>                                     30,919
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,898
<PP&E>                                          14,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,042
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 165,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,130
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              248
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   165,632
<SALES>                                        358,179
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               358,179
<CGS>                                          328,108
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  400,431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,542
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (43,794)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,897
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (45,691)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (45,691)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.07)
        

</TABLE>