alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18E0054. LOWE v. THE STATE.

Pursuant to Court of Appeals Rules 31 (i) and 40 (b), Dmykol Lowe’s

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPLICATION FOR

DISCRETIONARY APPEAL from the order revoking probation that was entered by

the trial court on April 26, 2018, is hereby GRANTED. Lowe shall file his

APPLICATION FOR DISCRETIONARY APPEAL on or before June 13, 2018.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

May 29, 2018

05/29/2018
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73886-73887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29335]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, December 19, 2014.

PLACE: Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC, 
9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance, enforcement, and examinations 
matters. In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site 
at http://www.cftc.gov.

[[Page 73887]]


CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-
5964.

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-29335 Filed 12-10-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Honorable Oscar B.McInnis

Criminal,District Attorney County Courthouse Edinburg, Texas 78539

Dear Mr. McInnis: Opinion No. M-983 Re: Whether provisions of Senate Bill No. 841,Acts 62nd Legislature, R.S., 1971 (Art.1083,V.A.C.C.P.) require collection of court costs for thebenefit of the Criminal Justice Planning Fundfinconnection with convictions for offenseswhich occurred prior toAugust 30, 1971, the effective date of legislation. You have requested the opinion of this office as to the following question:

"Does this new statute [S.B. 8411 require the collection of the additional court cost for the benefit of the Criminal Justice Planning Fund on those cases inwhich the offenses were committed prior toAugust 30, 1971, the effective date of thisAct?" Your question must be answered in the negative. Senate Bill 841provides, inpart: "Sec. 3. (a)The Sum of $2.50 shall be taxed as costs ,ofcourt, in addition to other taxable court costs, upon conviction in each misdemeanor case inwhich original jurisdiction lies in courts whose jurisdiction is limited to amaximum fine of $200.00 only.

"Sec. 4. The sum of $5.00 shall be taxed
-4796-.’
.

Honorable Oscar B. McInnis, page 2 (M-983)

as costs of court, in addition to other taxable court costs, upon conviction in each misdemeanor case and the sum of $10.00 shall be taxed as costs of court, in addition to other taxable court costs, upon conviction in each felony case in all cases inwhich original jurisdiction lies in courts whose jurisdiction is limited to fines and/or confinement in a jail or the department of corrections. "Sec. 5. The costs due the State under this Act shall be collected along with and in the samemanner as other fines or costs are collected in the case." It is awell settled principle of law that statutes are presumed to operate prospectively unless there is a clear expression to the contrary. 53Tex.Jur.2d 51,Statutes Sec. 28. Moreover, penal statutes imposing apenalty must be strictly construed and theperson seeking to recover the penalty must bring himself clearly within the terms of the statute. 53Tex.Jur.2d 306, Statutes, Sec. 198. Tohold otherwise would be inviolation of,Article I, Section.16, of the Texas Constitution. See Ex.Parte~Carson, 159 S.W.2d 126 ',X .ChGA-n,.

1&4V;*;

%x PsttL~Wian.,4FL5EX .CL% ',T%x .pZ,i.!. .lA%%',

; Caldwell v. State, 55Ala. 133 (1876). Inview of the foregoing authorities, it is our opinion that the additional items of court costprovided by Senate Bill 841 cannot be assessed on offenses committed prior to August 30, 1971. SUMMARY Additional court costs under Senate Bill 841 cannot be assessed on conviction for offenses coanaittedprior toAuguat 30, 1971, the effective date of theAct since a statute will not be applied retroactively with a clear expression to that effect. ;

eyGeneral of Texas
-4797-, Honorable Oscar B.McInnis, page 3 (M-983)

Prepared byMax P. Flusche Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman Lonny Zwiener Malcom Smith Austin Bray Camm Lary SAM MCDANIEL Staff Legal Assistant ALFRED WALKER Executive Assistant NOLA WHITE First Assistant

-4798-
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 164 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 164

     To provide appropriations for a border wall and provide for a 
      moratorium on certain other funding, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

  Mr. Good of Virginia (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Tiffany, Mr. 
    Gaetz, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, and Mr. Massie) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations, 
and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide appropriations for a border wall and provide for a 
      moratorium on certain other funding, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Close Biden's Open Border Act''.

SEC. 2. BORDER WALL FUNDING.

    (a) In General.--There is appropriated, out of any amounts in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $15,000,000,000 for the Secretary 
of Homeland Security to construct a border wall along the southern 
border of the United States. To the extent available, such amounts 
shall be derived from the unobligated balance of amounts appropriated 
(as of the day before the date of the enactment of this Act) for the 
purpose described in subsection (b).
    (b) Moratorium.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
amounts may be authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made 
available, during the 2-year period beginning on the date of the 
enactment of this Act, for United States contributions to the United 
Nations.
                                 <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1960 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health 

and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration Program Management for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration Program Management for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1960 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV3 ICES, HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES 

4 ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 

5 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Department of Health and Human Services, 

9 Health Resources and Services Administration Program 

10 Management for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

11 $155,250,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<page>			EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund II L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin
Perry, Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		November 14, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form 10-QSB of Kent Financial Services, Inc. for the three months ended June 30,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                           0000316028                     
<NAME>                                          KENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1000
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          8,369
<SECURITIES>                                    4,746
<RECEIVABLES>                                     270
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               13,385
<PP&E>                                          1,656
<DEPRECIATION>                                    400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 14,793
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,569
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          103
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,588
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   14,793
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,406
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                2,017
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (736)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (65)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (671)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (671)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.65)
        


</TABLE>
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19 - 0371

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICKEY RODNEY PAYNE,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursu ant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Donald L. Harris , Dis trict Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 18 2021

08/18/2021
Case Number: DA 19-0371
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                  SUBSIDIARIES' NAMES                       JURISDICTION
                  -------------------                       ------------
 <C>                                                   <S>
                                                       Nova Scotia unlimited
 Numerical Nova Scotia Company                         liability company
                                                       Nova Scotia unlimited
 Cadabra Design Automation Inc.                        liability company
 Cadabra Design Automation (USA) Inc                   California Corporation
 Cadabra (Europe) SARL                                 France
 Transcription Enterprises, Inc.                       Delaware Corporation
 Numerical Subwavelength Technologies Netherlands B.V. The Netherlands
 Numerical Technologies Taiwan                         Taiwan
 Numerical Technologies Korea                          Korea
 Numerical Technologies Japan K.K.                     Japan
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                           59,710
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    18,617
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                453,311
<PP&E>                                          310,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                  276,183
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                3,491,839
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         2,754,297
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                       5,000
<COMMON>                                          9,062
<OTHER-SE>                                      723,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  3,491,839
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   538,395
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              100,719
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1,243,439
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           1,243,439
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                  1,243,439
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.08
        


</TABLE>
```

                                EXHIBIT 99.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of
the Quarterly  Report of Provident  Financial Group,  Inc.  ("Provident") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Christopher
J. Carey,  Chief  Financial  Officer of Provident,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.   Section   1350,   as  adopted   pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Provident.

/s/ Christopher J. Carey
------------------------
Christopher J. Carey
Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2002
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1725 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1725

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 501(c)(3) 
   organizations from providing direct funding to official election 
                             organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2023

  Ms. Tenney (for herself, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Tiffany, Mr. Fitzgerald, 
 Mrs. Boebert, Mr. Cole, Mr. Moore of Alabama, Mr. Norman, Mrs. Miller 
 of Illinois, Mr. Bishop of North Carolina, Mr. Gosar, and Mr. Posey) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 501(c)(3) 
   organizations from providing direct funding to official election 
                             organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``End Zuckerbucks Act''.

SEC. 2. 501(C)(3) ORGANIZATIONS PROHIBITED FROM PROVIDING DIRECT 
              FUNDING TO ELECTION ORGANIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and which does not participate'' and 
        inserting ``which does not participate'', and
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``, and 
        which does not provide below-cost services, scholarships, 
        subsidies, or direct, in-kind, or indirect funding to official 
        election organizations, including any State or local government 
        entity or any government election organization.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to funding provided in taxable years beginning after December 31, 
2023.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of  CreditRiskMonitor.com,  Inc. ("CRM")
on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ended  September  30,  2005,  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Lawrence Fensterstock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                           By: /s/ Lawrence Fensterstock
                                                   Lawrence Fensterstock
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2005


                                       22
#### Board of Managers of The Lenox Grand Condominium, Respondent, v DSW Lenox LLC, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[974 NYS2d 452]

*468Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R Kapnick, J.), entered December 20, 2012, which granted plaintiffs order to show cause and directed defendant DSW Lenox LLC to pay to plaintiff $61,766.73 by January 15, 2013, plus monthly common charges in the aggregate amount of $7,918.96 from November 2012 onward, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

DSW’s contention that plaintiff lacks standing to bring this lawsuit because it was not properly constituted is not properly raised on the instant appeal. In April 2010, the motion court denied DSW’s motion to dismiss this action due to plaintiffs lack of standing, and DSW did not appeal from that order. In any event, the board that imposed the charges at issue in the instant order to show cause is not the same as the board that commenced this action.

The main reason that plaintiff increased common charges effective May 2012 was legal fees in this action and in a derivative action brought by DSW As DSW acknowledges, it failed to argue to the motion court that plaintiff may not advance board members’ cost for defending themselves in the derivative action. We decline to consider this argument for the first time on appeal because, if DSW had argued to the motion court that Business Corporation Law § 723 (c) required an undertaking for advancement of defense costs, plaintiff could have submitted evidence thereof. Notwithstanding, we note that a condominium is an unincorporated association governed not by the Business Corporation Law but by Real Property Law article 9-B *(see Pomerance v McGrath,*104 AD3d 440 [1st Dept 2013]; *4260 Broadway Realty Co. v Assimakopoulos,*264 AD2d 626 [1st Dept 1999]).

DSW’s argument that defense costs are not proper common charges pursuant to the Lenox Grand Condominium’s by-laws is unpreserved, but DSW may raise it for the first time on appeal because the by-laws are in the record *(see e.g. Vanship Holdings Ltd. v Energy Infrastructure Acquisition Corp.,*65 AD3d 405, 408 [1st Dept 2009]). However, the by-laws state, “The common expenses may . . . include such amounts as the Board of Managers may deem necessary for customary or extraordinary legal expenses incurred with respect to the Condominium Property.”

Plaintiff is not bound by the amended purchase agreement signed by nonparty Rosetree on Lenox LLC, the former sponsor of the condominium *(see Board of Mgrs. of 500 W. End Condo*
      *469
      *minium v Ainetchi,*84 AD3d 603, 604 [1st Dept 2011]; *Leonard v Gateway II, LLC,*68 AD3d 408 [1st Dept 2009]). We are not persuaded by DSW’s argument that the board that imposed the charges at issue in the instant order to show cause was Rosetree’s alter ego.

We have considered DSW’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Friedman, Sweeny, Moskowitz and Clark, JJ.