alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The County of Guadalupe, 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 21, 2014

No. 04-14-00497-CV

David GOAD,

Appellant

v.

THE COUNTY OF GUADALUPE, Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-1923-CV

William Old, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On July 7, 2014, appellant filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s June 4, 2014

judgment.1 On September 30, 2014, appellant filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs in this 

court. It appears appellant did not file his affidavit in the trial court. 

A party who cannot pay the costs of an appeal must file an affidavit of indigence “in the 

trial court with or before the notice of appeal.” TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(c)(1). Appellant’s affidavit 

was therefore due in the trial court on July 7, 2014, the date his notice of appeal was filed, or a 

motion for extension of time to file the affidavit was due in this court fifteen days later, on July 

22, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(c)(1), (3). 

We construed the affidavit filed in this court as a motion for extension of time to file the 

affidavit in the trial court. Although the affidavit was filed outside the fifteen-day deadline set 

forth in Rule 20.1(3), we noted that an untimely affidavit of indigence can be “adequate to fulfill 

the fundamental purpose of Rule 20.1.” Higgins v. Randall County Sheriff’s Office, 257 S.W.3d 

684 (Tex. 2008). Accordingly, we granted the motion to extend time to file an affidavit of 

inability to pay costs and ordered the clerk of this court to send copies of the affidavit and this 

order to the district clerk, the court reporter, and all parties. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(d)(2). We 

further ordered that any contest to the affidavit of indigence had to be filed in this court on or 

before October 13, 2014. As of the date of this order, no contest was filed. 

1 This is the date the notice of appeal was filed in the trial court. The notice of appeal was not forwarded to this 

court until July 16, 2014. The date of the judgment is based on a statement in the notice of appeal – the clerk’s 

record has not yet been filed. 

 
Accordingly, we find appellant is indigent. Because appellant is indigent, the district 

clerk must file the clerk’s record without requiring payment from appellant. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the district clerk to file the clerk’s record in this court without cost to appellant on or 

before November 20, 2014. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on appellant, all counsel, 

and the district clerk. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of October, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IB 

Union Calendar No. 286 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1432 

[Report No. 118–351] 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the deductibility 

of charitable contributions to certain organizations for members of the 

Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2023 

Mr. WENSTRUP (for himself and Mr. PANETTA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

JANUARY 18, 2024 

Additional sponsors: Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. MURPHY, Mrs. MILLER of West 

Virginia, Mr. CAREY, Ms. SEWELL, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. CROW, Mr. 

TONY GONZALES of Texas, Mr. CARBAJAL, Mr. DAVIS of North Carolina, 

Mr. RYAN, Mr. BAIRD, Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS, and Mr. FITZPATRICK

JANUARY 18, 2024 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on March 7, 2023] 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1432 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for the deductibility of charitable contributions to certain 

organizations for members of the Armed Forces. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 1432 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VSO Equal Tax Treat5 ment Act’’ or as the ‘‘VETT Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEDUCTIBILITY OF CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS 

7 TO CERTAIN ORGANIZATIONS FOR MEMBERS 

8 OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 170(c) of the Internal Rev10 enue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting after paragraph 

11 (5) the following new paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(6) An organization described in section 

13 501(c)(19) that is a federally chartered corporation.’’. 

14 (b) PERCENTAGE LIMITATION.—Section 170(b)(1)(A) 

15 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik16 ing ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (viii), by adding ‘‘or’’ at the 

17 end of clause (ix), and by inserting after clause (ix) the 

18 following new clause: 

19 ‘‘(x) an organization described in sec20 tion 501(c)(19) that is a federally chartered 

21 corporation,’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this 

23 section shall apply to taxable years beginning after the date 

24 of the enactment of this Act. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Union Calendar No. 286 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1432 

[Report No. 118–351] 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

of the Armed Forces. tributions to certain organizations for members provide for the deductibility of charitable conJANUARY 18, 2024 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 Netegrity, Inc.

                            Certification Pursuant To
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Netegrity, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Barry N. Bycoff, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: October 28, 2003                    /s/ Barry N. Bycoff
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Barry N. Bycoff
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 245 (Monday, December 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 76398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29854]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

[NARA-2015-016]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Cancellation

AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

ACTION: Cancellation of notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 4, 2014, NARA published a notice (79 FR 72033) 
that the agency was proposing to reinstate the information collection 
National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC) Grant 
Program, Budget Form and Instructions (OMB number 3095-0013, agency 
form number NA Form 17001), which NHPRC uses in its grant program. NARA 
invited the public to comment on the proposed information collection 
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. However, NARA is now 
cancelling that notice and request for comment, due to errors. NARA 
will publish a new, corrected notice and request for comments within 
the week.

DATES: This cancellation is effective immediately upon publication in 
the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Paperwork Reduction Act Comments (ISSD), Room 4400, National 
Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Rd., College Park, MD 
20740-6001; or faxed to 301-713-7409; or electronically mailed to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#790d18141c1c571f1c1a11111c15143917180b18571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="780c19151d1d561e1d1b10101d14153816190a19561f170e">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tamee Fechhelm at telephone number 
301-837-1694, or fax number 301-713-7409.

    Dated: December 16, 2014.
Penny Ha,
Acting Executive for Information Services/CIO.
[FR Doc. 2014-29854 Filed 12-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1857 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1857

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Office 
      of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Office 
      of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR SENATE, OFFICE OF 
              THE SERGEANT AT ARMS AND DOORKEEPER FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Senate, Office of the 
Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 
$84,157,000.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of David Binkley, Petitioner, v Maureen O'Connor, Respondent.

[870 NYS2d 916]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Maureen *835O’Connor, an Assistant District Attorney in the office of Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York County, to produce, among other documents, copies of an arrest warrant and search warrants in connection with an action entitled *People v Binkley*in the Supreme Court, New York County, under indictment Nos. 10210/95 and 165/98. Application by the petitioner to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the fifing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have original subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding, as no “justice of the supreme court or . . . judge of a county court or the court of general sessions” was named as a respondent (CPLR 506 [b] [1]). Since subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived, the proceeding must be dismissed *(see Matter of Nolan v Lungen,*61 NY2d 788 [1984]; *Matter of Hamilton v Brown,*54 AD3d 760 [2008]; CPLR 7804 [b]; *cf. Matter of Law Offs, of Andrew F. Capoccia v Spitzer,*270 AD2d 643, 644 n 2 [2000]). Rivera, J.E, Santucci, Garni and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      11,211,960
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,405,313
<ALLOWANCES>                                   529,905
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,540,189
<PP&E>                                       1,625,291
<DEPRECIATION>                                 625,262
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,593,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,553,831
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       144,163
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,895,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,593,437
<SALES>                                      8,026,673
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,026,673
<CGS>                                        2,331,442
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,331,442
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,292,586
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             118,912
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,478,443)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,597,355)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,478,443)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.2

I, Kay Carter, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal financial
officer) of Whitehall Limited, Inc. certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Whitehall Limited,
Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change
in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February 17, 2004

| |  |                                                  
| |  | -------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Kay Carter                                   
| |  |                                                  
| |  | Kay Carter, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6411

DAVID LEE SMITH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RICK JACKSON, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:06-hc-02061-BO) Submitted: July 19, 2007 Decided: July 24, 2007 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Lee Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Diane Appleton Reeves, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: David Lee Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683- 84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Matrix Energy Services Corporation (the "Company"), on Form
10-QSB, as amended, for the period ending September, 30, 2002 (the "Report"), I,
Joe Bill Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joe Bill Bennett, Chief Executive Officer

February 24, 2005



<PAGE>


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Matrix Energy Services Corporation (the "Company"), on Form
10-QSB, as amended, for the period ending September, 30, 2002 (the "Report"), I,
Mark S. Zouvas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/
-----------------------------------------------------
Mark S. Zouvas, Chief Financial Officer

February 24, 2005
---

---

EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Global Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), we, Asi Shalgi, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, and Alex Werber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:

| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By: /s/ Asi Shalgi
Asi ShalgiChief Executive Officer and President
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By: /s/ Alex Werber
Alex WerberTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 18, 2009



---

---