alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.12



 Exhibit 10.12 

Summary Translation of 

Loan Agreement for Capital Contribution 

Lender: Chongqing Shenggu Investment Co., Ltd. 
 Borrower:
Chongqing Central BPO Industry Co., Ltd. 
  

	1.	Purpose of loan agreement. 

 The purpose of the loan agreement is for the Borrower’s
capital contribution in the formation of the Lender. 
  

	2.	Amount of loan. 

 RMB 12,200,000. 

 

	3.	Loan term. 

 The loan was entered into in April 2013 and is due on demand. 

 

	4.	Interest rate and method of payment. 

 The loan is interest free. 

 

	5.	Repayment Date. 

 The loan is due on demand. 

 

	6.	Prepayment. 

 The loan can be repaid at anytime without penalty. 

 

	7.	Guarantee. 

 There is no guarantee for the loan. 

 

	8.	Non-material terms. 

 Because this is an oral loan agreement, no other terms have been
omitted from this summary.
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.’s 333-160486, 333-151686, 333-148041, 333-126306, 333-122708, 333-116449, 333-103622, 333-64246, 333-56576, and 333-32666) of our report dated June 29, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Selectica, Inc., included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the two year period ended March 31, 2011.





/s/ Armanino McKenna LLPSan Jose, CaliforniaJune 29, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       6
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
September 30, 2000 Form 10-Q Balance  Sheets and Statements of Operations and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                     35,923
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                    34,081
<RECEIVABLES>                                202
<ASSETS-OTHER>                               266
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            34,549
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                       0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                        0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    143
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                          143
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                       0
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                        222
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        222
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                      0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                         0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                        0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                       0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                  (1,877)
<NET-ASSETS>                              34,406
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                              0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                          1,670
<OTHER-INCOME>                               715
<EXPENSES-NET>                               894
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                    1,491
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                      (7)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                     47
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                      1,531
<EQUALIZATION>                                 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                      0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                          0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                        0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                    0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                            0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                     1,531
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                        0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                      0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                        0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                     0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              894
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                      33,640
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                     146.74
<PER-SHARE-NII>                             5.41
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                     0.18
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                           0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                      0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                           0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                       152.33
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                            0.027


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1924 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1924

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
  Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Migrant and Seasonal 
               Farmworker Programs for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
  Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Migrant and Seasonal 
               Farmworker Programs for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 
              EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION, MIGRANT AND 
              SEASONAL FARMWORKER PROGRAMS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Labor, 
Employment and Training Administration, Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker 
Programs for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $88,896,000.
                                 <all>
```
11943.

#### Ingram *v.*The State.

Luke, J.

X. Grounds of a motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission of evidence, which state that the evidence was admitted “ over the timely objections of the defendant, *”*but which fail to show what *234grounds of objection wore then and there urged and overruled by the trial court, present no question for decision by this court. *Somers*v. *State,*116 *Ga.*535 (3) (42 S. E. 779).

Decided January 27, 1921.

Indictment for murder — conviction of manslaughter; from Dooly superior court — Judge Gower. October 11, 1920.

*Walls Powell,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. B. Wall, solicitor-general, Jesse Grantham,*contra.

*(a)*The first five grounds of the amendment to the motion in the instant case come within this rule.

2. The accused having been indicted for murder and convicted of .voluntary manslaughter, the court’s charge on malice, being applicable to the offense of murder only, could not afford cause for a new trial, even if it might otherwise have been erroneous. The 6th special ground of the motion for a new trial is therefore without merit.

3. There being evidence tending to show that, while the decedent was at the home of the accused, a quarrel arose between them, that the decedent assaulted the accused and with his fist struck the accused in the abdomen, and that the accused thereupon drew his pistol and shot the decedent to death, the court did not err in giving in charge to the jury the law of voluntary manslaughter. Whether the killing was the result of malice or of passion was, under all the evidence, 'a question for the jury. Grounds 7, 8, and 10 of the motion for a new trial are therefore without merit.

(a) Ground 9, not being approved by the trial judge, will not be considered.

4. The court did not err in charging the jury that “ the doctrine of reasonable fears applies only when the danger is urgent and pressing, or apparently so, at the time of the killing, ” Such a charge does not unduly exclude from the consideration of the jury any of the facts and circumstances preceding and leading up to the killing.

5. The evidence authorized the verdict, and no error requiring the grant of a new trial is' made to appear.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, G. J., and Blood worth, J., concur.*
Exhibit 15.2

August 4, 2009

Beckman Coulter, Inc.

4300 N.
Harbor Boulevard

Fullerton, CA 92834-3100

Re: Registration
Statement Nos. 333-155275, 333-145422, 333-100904, 333-156005, 333-24851, 333-37429, 33-31573, 33-41519, 33-51506, 33-66990, 33-66988, 333-69291, 333-59099, 333-69249, 333-69251, 333-72896 and 333-72892

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated August 4, 2009, related to our review of
interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a
registration statement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP      
|                  
|Irvine, California
Exhibit 32 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

The undersigned officer of FieldPoint Petroleum Corporation (the"Company") hereby certifies that:

     i.     theaccompanying Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscalquarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

     ii.     theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 24, 2004

/s/ RayReaves                              Ray Reaves, President,Chief Executive Officer, Treasurerand Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         540,206
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     42,340
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               635,088
<PP&E>                                       6,038,053
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,000,552
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,712,864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          260,660
<BONDS>                                      1,950,265
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,501,940
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,712,864
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,368,190
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  750,703
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               729,854
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              96,711
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                800,617
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            800,617
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   800,617
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   133.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   133.44
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

THOMAS SINCLAIR,

 :

Petitioner,

 :

vs. CIVIL ACTION 07-00214-CG-B

 :

WARDEN JERRY FERRELL,

 :

Respondent.

ORDER

In an Order dated January 4, 2010 (Doc. 13), the Court

determined that Respondent had not established that the habeas

petition filed by Petitioner Thomas Sinclair was untimely filed and

that Sinclair’s petition was, indeed, timely. Accordingly, the

Court directed Respondent to file, no later than January 25, 2010,

an amended answer addressing the merits of Sinclair’s claims. A

review of the docket reflects that as of today’s date, Respondent

has not filed his amended answer. Accordingly, Respondent is

ORDERED to show cause, by February 12, 2010, for his failure to

file his amended answer and to file his amended answer at that

time. In conjunction with his amended answer, Respondent should

submit, as previously ordered, the trial record and any pertinent

transcripts or other documents as set forth in this Court’s Order

of April 25, 2007 (Doc. 3). 

DONE this 5th day of February, 2010.

 /S/ SONJA F. BIVINS 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00214-CG-B Document 14 Filed 02/05/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gary Wolfson, Chief Executive Officer of Genesis Technology Group, Inc.
certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Genesis
Technology Group, Inc.

         2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

         6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


January 13, 2004

/S/  Gary Wolfson
     Gary Wolfson
Chief Executive Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1849

FRANCISCO K. AVOKI , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CAROLINAS TELCO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION; DOES I

- XXX , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Graham C. Mullen , Senior District Judge. ( 3:17

- cv
- 00746

- GCM )

Submitted : December 18, 2018 Decided: December 20, 2018

Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Francisco Avoki, Appellant Pro Se. James M. Dedman, IV, GALLIVAN, WHITE & BOYD, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding pre cedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Francisco K. Avoki appeals the district court’s order granting the Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Carolina s Telco Federal Credit Union and dismissing Avoki’s civil action . We have reviewe d the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Avoki v.
Carolinas Telco Fed. Credit Union , No. 3:17

- cv
- 00746

- GCM (W.D.N.C. July 24, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the fa cts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1830 

To prohibit a Federal firearms licensee from transferring a long gun to 

a person who the licensee knows or has reasonable cause to believe 

does not reside in (or if the person is a corporation or other business 

entity, does not maintain a place of business in) the State in which 

the licensee’s place of business is located. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2023 

Mr. CROW (for himself, Mr. RASKIN, Ms. NORTON, Mr. NEGUSE, and Ms. 

TLAIB) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit a Federal firearms licensee from transferring 

a long gun to a person who the licensee knows or has 

reasonable cause to believe does not reside in (or if 

the person is a corporation or other business entity, 

does not maintain a place of business in) the State 

in which the licensee’s place of business is located. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Closing the Loophole 

5 on Interstate Firearm Sales Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1830 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION TO LONG GUNS OF BAN ON LICENSEE 

2 TRANSFER OF FIREARM TO OUT-OF-STATE 

3 PERSON. 

4 Section 922(b)(3) of title 18, United States Code, is 

5 amended by striking ‘‘(A)’’ and all that follows through 

6 ‘‘(B)’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
|   | (i) | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter      ended September 27, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of, and for, the periods presented in the  Report. |
|--------|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 6, 2009 | /s/      ILAN DASKAL                                                                                |
|----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                             |  Ilan      DaskalChief      Financial Officer(Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco Gerardo VASQUEZ-TORRES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40058

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 20, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, Mark Michael Dowd, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Brownsville, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Francisco Gerardo Vasquez-Torres (Vasquez) appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry. Vasquez argues for the first time on appeal pursuant to *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. The Government does not seek to enforce Vasquez’s appeal waiver; therefore, it is nonbinding. *See United States v. Story,*439 F.3d 226, 231 (5th Cir.2006).

Vasquez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Vasquez contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v.*
      *389
      *Garzco-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Vasquez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.