alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2039 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, 

Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, Salaries and Expenses for 

fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 RELATED AGENCIES, FEDERAL MEDIATION 

5 AND CONCILIATION SERVICE, SALARIES AND 

6 EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Related Agencies, Federal Mediation and ConcilVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:27 Apr 17, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2039.IH H2039

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2039 IH

1 iation Service, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 

2 may not exceed $47,550,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         134,762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,926
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               216,688
<PP&E>                                             238
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 414,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          364,672
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        73,755
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   414,736
<SALES>                                        178,991
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               181,965
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  134,497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,468
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,468
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64
        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1878 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of Representatives, Allowance for Compensation of Interns in House Leadership Offices 

for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House 

of Representatives, Allowance for Compensation of Interns in House Leadership Offices for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, ALLOWANCE 

5 FOR COMPENSATION OF INTERNS IN HOUSE 

6 LEADERSHIP OFFICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 

7 2024. 

8 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

9 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 07:01 Apr 13, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1878.IH H1878

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1878 IH

1 able for House of Representatives, Allowance for Com2 pensation of Interns in House Leadership Offices for fiscal 

3 year 2024 may not exceed $0.00. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
##### 



Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /S/ Maria R. SchekerName:
    
    Maria R. SchekerTitle:
    
    Chief Accounting OfficerDate:
    
    May 10, 2007
 82
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of HCSB Financial Corporation (the “Company”), certifies that, to his knowledge on the date of this certification:

 

1.               The annual report of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | March 18, 2011 |   | By:    | /s/ James R. Clarkson                          |
|--------|---------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|   |                |   |   | James   R. Clarkson                            |
|   |                |   |   | President &   Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                |   |   |                                           |
| Date:  | March 18, 2011 |   | By:    | /s/ Edward L. Loehr, Jr.                  |
|   |                |   |   | Edward   L. Loehr, Jr.                    |
|   |                |   |   | Principal   Financial Officer                  |

 

1

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6885

DAVID W. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS/BOTETOURT FACILITY; P.J. RICE; DR. 

LEE; MAJOR RICHARDS,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior 

District Judge. (7:10-cv-00129-JLK-MFU)

Submitted: February 22, 2011 Decided: March 18, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David W. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

David W. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing his action without prejudice for failing to 

comply with the conditional filing order and 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(a)(2) (2006). This court may exercise jurisdiction only 

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 

337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Williams seeks to appeal 

is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or 

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction. We deny Williams’s motion for injunctive 

relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 D0 18 7 . ANTHONY J ACKSON v . THE STATE.

An t h o n y J ack s o n w as co n v i ct ed o f ag g rav at ed as s au l t

, ag g rav at ed b at t ery , an d

b u rg lary

, an d h i s co n vi ct i o n s were affi rm ed o n d irect ap p eal in 2 0 1 2

. See Ja cks o n v.

S t a t e , 3 1 6 Ga. Ap p

. 5 8 8 (7 3 0 SE2 d 6 9 ) (2 0 1 2 ). In 2 0 1 6, J ack s o n fi l ed m o t i o n s to

am en d h i s s en t en ce co m p u t at i o n an d fo r an ou t -o f-t i m e ap p eal

. On Sep t em b er 1,

2 0 1 6

, t h e t r i a l co u rt d en ied J ack s o n ’ s m ot i o n s

. J ack s o n fi l ed t h i s ap p l i cat i o n fo r

d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal o n N o v em b er 2 8, 2 0 1 6

, ch al l en g in g t h e d en i al o f h is m o t i o n fo r

an o u t -o f-t i m e ap peal . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n fo r t wo reas o ns

. Fi rs t

, b ecau s e J ack so n al read y h as h ad a d i rect ap p eal

, h e is n o t en t i tl ed t o an

o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal

. See Ri ch a r d s v. S t a t e , 2 7 5 Ga. 1 9 0

, 1 9 1 (5 6 3 SE2 d 8 5 6 ) (2 0 0 2 )

(“ [T] h ere i s n o ri g h t to d i rect l y ap p eal t h e d en i al o f a m o ti o n fo r o u t -o f-t im e ap p eal

fi led b y a cri m in al d efen d an t w h o s e co n vi ct i o n has been affi rm ed o n di rect ap p eal .”).

M o reo v er, to b e v al i d, an ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal m u s t b e f i l e d

wi t h i n 30 d ay s o f t h e en t ry o f t he o rd er or j u d gm en t t o b e ap p eal ed

. See O CGA § 5

-
6 -3 5 (d ); Hi l l v. St a t e , 2 0 4 Ga. A p p

. 58 2 (4 20 SE2 d 3 9 3) (1 9 9 2). Here, J ack s o n fi l ed December 13, 2016h i s ap p l icat i o n 8 8 day s aft er t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er was en t ered

. A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e

ap p li cat io n i s u n t i m el y

an d i s h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 12/13/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE )

COMPANY, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION 14-0294-WS-N

 )

BULLDOG MARINE, INC., et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff’s motion for entry of default 

under Rule 55(a). (Doc. 41). The motion is directed against all defendants except 

Pedro Baez. All of the defendants have filed an answer, (Doc. 10), and entry of 

default against a defendant is not permitted under Rule 55(a) so long as an answer 

remains pending as to that defendant. The report and recommendation (“R&R”) 

of the Magistrate Judge recommends that the answer be stricken as to these 

defendants and that the motion for entry of default then be granted. (Doc. 49 at 5). 

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide for such a sequence. E.g., Eagle 

Hospital Physicians, LLC v. SRG Consulting, Inc., 561 F.3d 1298, 1302-03, 1307 

(11th Cir. 2009); Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp., 123 F.3d 1353, 1366 (11th

Cir. 1997).

The parties declined the opportunity to object to the R&R. After due and 

proper consideration of all portions of the file deemed relevant to the issues raised, 

the R&R made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3) and dated November 20, 2014, 

including the entirety of the previous order discussed therein, (Doc. 45), is 

adopted as the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ordered that:

1. The plaintiff’s motion for entry of default is granted; 

Case 1:14-cv-00294-WS-N Document 54 Filed 12/16/14 Page 1 of 2
2

2. The answer, (Doc. 10), is stricken as to all defendants except Pedro E. 

Baez; and

3. The Clerk is directed to enter default against defendants Bulldog 

Marine, Inc.; Bulldog Marine, LLC; Blacktip Partners, Inc.; Blacktip Marine 

Partners, LLC; Brian Hall; and Brenda Hall.

DONE and ORDERED this 16th day of December, 2014.

s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00294-WS-N Document 54 Filed 12/16/14 Page 2 of 2
NIST 

Internet of Things Advisory Board 

(IoTAB)

Robby Moss

Opening Statement

January 18, 2023

Robby Moss, IoTAB Opening Statement, January 18, 2023 1
Representative Benefits of IIoT in Supply 

Chain Management

• Increased visibility and real-time tracking of goods, allowing for 

more accurate forecasting and inventory management.

• Improved communication and collaboration among suppliers, 

manufacturers, and logistics providers.

• Reduced downtime and maintenance costs through predictive 

maintenance and remote monitoring of equipment.

Robby Moss, IoTAB Opening Statement, January 18, 2023 2
Representative Manufacturing Related 

Opportunities

• Real-time monitoring and control of manufacturing processes can 

improve efficiency, reduce downtime and maintenance costs, and 

improve product quality.

• Predictive maintenance can be used to predict and prevent 

equipment failure, leading to improved efficiency and cost savings.

• Automation of repetitive and labor-intensive tasks can improve 

efficiency and reduce labor costs.

Robby Moss, IoTAB Opening Statement, January 18, 2023 3
Representative Procurement Related 

Opportunities

• Real-time tracking and monitoring of goods can improve inventory 

management and forecasting, leading to reduced lead times and 

improved customer service.

• Automated purchase order processing and invoice matching can 

reduce manual errors and improve accuracy, leading to improved 

efficiency.

• Predictive analytics can be used to anticipate demand and optimize 

purchasing decisions, leading to improved efficiency and cost savings.

Robby Moss, IoTAB Opening Statement, January 18, 2023 4
Potential Challenges of Implementing IIoT in 

Supply Chain Management

• High initial investment costs for the implementation of IIoT

technology and infrastructure.

• Difficulty in integrating existing systems and devices with new IIoT

technology.

• Lack of standardization and interoperability among different IIoT

systems and devices.

• Ensuring data privacy and security to prevent cyber threats and 

breaches.

• Limited technical expertise among supply chain managers to fully 

utilize the capabilities of IIoT.

Robby Moss, IoTAB Opening Statement, January 18, 2023 5
Change Management Challenges

• Resistance to change: Employees may resist changes to their existing 

workflows and processes, leading to resistance and a lack of adoption of 

IIoT technology.

• Limited understanding of IIoT: Many employees may lack the 

understanding and knowledge required to fully utilize the capabilities of 

IIoT, leading to a lack of adoption.

• Training and support: Employees may require training and support in order 

to fully utilize the capabilities of IIoT, which can be time-consuming and 

costly.

• Alignment with business goals: It's important to align the implementation 

of IIoT with the company's overall business goals, and to communicate the 

benefits of IIoT to employees to gain their buy-in.

Robby Moss, IoTAB Opening Statement, January 18, 2023 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          64,883
<SECURITIES>                                 1,251,006
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,283
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,377,241
<PP&E>                                          78,968
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,178,741
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,193
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        94,483
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,060,529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,178,741
<SALES>                                         79,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               224,930
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               141,450
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 83,480
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,704
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             66,776
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    66,776
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1 Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection
with the Annual Report of U.S. Neurosurgical, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan Gold, President and Chief Executive
Officer of U.S. Neurosurgical, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1)
The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of U.S.
  Neurosurgical, Inc.  /s/ Alan
  GoldAlan GoldPresident
  and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 28,
  2006
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 26, 2012

s1217

Order 

December 26, 2012

145256

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145256

COA: 304046

Wayne CC: 10-005881-FC

COREY JAMAL HARRIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 2 2- 041

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JAMES MICHAEL PARKER

,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time,

there being no objection from the State, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension

of time to and including January 26 , 202 3 , within which to prepare, file,

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 22 2022

12/22/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0041
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED
                                  STATES CODE)

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Internet
Initiative Japan Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended
March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 11, 2006

                                INTERNET INITIATIVE JAPAN INC.

                                       /s/ Akihisa Watai
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                Name:  Akihisa Watai
                                Title: Director, Chief Financial Officer and
                                       Chief Accounting Officer
#### Alexander Carroll *v.*W. F. Collins.

Purchaser of Real Estate — Knowledge.

Where one about to purchase real estate hears that his grantor has already conveyed it to a named person, makes no inquiry of such person, but purchases upon the vendor declaring he has not conveyed, and the public records showing no conveyance,, he cannot be protected for the want of knowledge of the prior sale. He should have made inquiry of the person whom he had heard had bought it.

APPEAL PROM BELL CIRCUIT COURT.

March 18, 1875.

Opinion uy

Judge Peters:

Appdlant admits in his answer that a rumor had reached him that A. Goodwin had sold the land to appellee, but that Goodwin told him he had not done so, and that he had examined in the clerk’s office to ascertain whether a conveyance had been made to appellee, and finding none, he concluded there had been no sale, and he therefore purchased.

He did not rely on what Goodwin told him on the subject of the sale, as his conduct shows, and from the action of Goodwin in this record he certainly, if he knew him as he must have done, could not have confided in his statements. He had heai;d enough about the sale to appellee to put him on inquiry in relation thereto, *445and he should, therefore, have gone to- appellee, from whom he could have learned the facts. And having failed to do so, his purchase cannot be protected for the want of knowledge of the prior sale, of which he had heard, and could have, by proper diligence, known all about.

*Green*Adams, *J. & J. W.*Rodman, *for appellant.*

*Tinsley &*Dishman, *for appellee.*

The deed to appellee recites a valuable consideration, and if appellee has not paid the amount, he can be compelled to pay it.

Judgment *affirmed.*
**EXHIBIT 23.03**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-87505, 333-92159, 333-93591, 333-32460, 333-35730, 333-64552, 333-59842, 333-55822 and 333-104711) of KANA Software, Inc., previously Kana Communications, Inc., of our report dated March 17,2004, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose, California 

July 5, 2006