alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 
 **Pursuant
        to**
 **18
        U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 **As
        Adopted pursuant to**
 **Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 I,
        Zeynep
        Hakimoglu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
        of
        ClearOne Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September
        30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
        Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of ClearOne Communications,
        Inc.
  
 Date:  November
                  12, 2007
              By:
              /s/
                  Zeynep HakimogluZeynep
                  HakimogluChairman,
                  President and Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
                  Executive Officer)
  
 **A
        signed original of the written statement above required by Section 906 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to ClearOne Communications,
        Inc.
        and will be retained by ClearOne Communications, Inc. and furnished to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.**
EXHIBIT 32.1

SELECTICA, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Selectica, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brenda Zawatski, Co-Chair of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: July 8, 2009



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/    BRENDA
ZAWATSKI
|Brenda Zawatski       
|Co-Chair
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1750 

To modify the minimum required weight of orange juice soluble solids. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2023 

Mr. C. SCOTT FRANKLIN of Florida (for himself, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, 

Mr. WALTZ, Ms. SALAZAR, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, 

Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. POSEY, Mr. STEUBE, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Mr. 

SOTO, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mrs. CHERFILUS-MCCORMICK, Mrs. CAMMACK, 

Mr. MOSKOWITZ, Mr. GIMENEZ, Mrs. LUNA, and Mr. BUCHANAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

A BILL 

To modify the minimum required weight of orange juice 

soluble solids. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defending Domestic 

5 Orange Juice Production Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1750 IH

1 SEC. 2. REVISION OF PASTEURIZED ORANGE JUICE STAND2 ARDS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Effective on the date of enact4 ment of this Act, the standard of identity for ‘‘pasteurized 

5 orange juice’’, established in section 146.140 of title 21, 

6 Code of Federal Regulations, shall be deemed to require 

7 finished pasteurized orange juice to contain not less than 

8 10.0 percent by weight of orange juice soluble solids, ex9 clusive of the solids of any added optional sweetening in10 gredients. 

11 (b) REGULATION AUTHORITY.—Nothing in this sec12 tion shall be construed to limit the authority of the Sec13 retary of Health and Human Services to promulgate regu14 lations to amend the standard of identity for pasteurized 

15 orange juice. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000316736
<NAME>                          Fieldpoint Petroleum Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                                            1
<CURRENCY>                                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                  SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                         1
<CASH>                                                            426,301
<SECURITIES>                                                        2,880
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     245,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       74,192
<INVENTORY>                                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  728,725
<PP&E>                                                          3,150,416
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   (793,005)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  3,304,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             396,028
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                           69,959
<OTHER-SE>                                                      2,434,240
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    3,304,575
<SALES>                                                           383,942
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  416,161
<CGS>                                                             152,131
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     246,150
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   (7,897)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 21,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   156,364
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       39,160
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               117,204
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      117,204
<EPS-BASIC>                                                           .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         .02



</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Judlin MORTIMER, a/k/a Chris, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-6180.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 17, 2001.

Decided May 25, 2001.

*174Judlin Mortimer, pro se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, NC, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judlin Mortimer seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court.*
      *See United States v. Mortimer,*Nos. CR-96-176-MU; CA-98-7-3-MU (W.D.N.C. filed June 21, 2000; entered June 23, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

We recently held in *United States v. Sanders,*247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.2001), that the new rule announced in *Apprendi*v. *New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. Accordingly, Appellant’s *Apprendi*claim is not cognizable.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1804 

To designate certain airports as ports of entry and terminate the application 

of the user fee requirement under section 236 of the Trade and Tariff 

Act of 1984 with respect to the airport. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2023 

Mr. VICENTE GONZALEZ of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To designate certain airports as ports of entry and terminate 

the application of the user fee requirement under section 

236 of the Trade and Tariff Act of 1984 with respect 

to the airport. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honest Runway Label5 ing Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF CERTAIN AIRPORTS AS PORTS OF 

7 ENTRY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President shall— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1804 IH

1 (1) pursuant to the Act of August 1, 1914 (38 

2 Stat. 623, chapter 223; 19 U.S.C. 2), designate each 

3 airport described in subsection (b) as a port of 

4 entry; and 

5 (2) terminate the application of the user fee re6 quirement under section 236 of the Trade and Tar7 iff Act of 1984 (19 U.S.C. 58b) with respect to the 

8 airport. 

9 (b) AIRPORTS DESCRIBED.—An airport described in 

10 this subsection is an airport that— 

11 (1) is a primary airport (as defined in section 

12 47102 of title 49, United States Code); 

13 (2) is located not more than 30 miles from the 

14 northern or southern international land border of 

15 the United States; 

16 (3) is associated, through a formal, legal instru17 ment, including a valid contract or governmental or18 dinance, with a land border crossing or a seaport not 

19 more than 30 miles from the airport; and 

20 (4) through such association, meets the numer21 ical criteria considered by U.S. Customs and Border 

22 Protection for establishing a port of entry, as set 

23 forth in— 

24 (A) Treasury Decision 82–37 (47 Fed. 

25 Reg. 10137; relating to revision of customs criVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:40 Apr 08, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1804.IH H1804

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 1804 IH

1 teria for establishing ports of entry and sta2 tions), as revised by Treasury Decisions 86–14 

3 (51 Fed. Reg. 4559) and 87–65 (52 Fed. Reg. 

4 16328); or 

5 (B) any successor guidance or regulation. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Alexander Vinogradov, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Golden Telecom, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliabilityof financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by the report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
   Date: March 11, 2005    /s/ ALEXANDER VINOGRADOV
Alexander Vinogradov
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Lee Ann Colbert

, * From the 3 9th District Court

of Haskell County,

Trial Court No. 12258

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 8

- 00 0 63

- CV * March 19 , 20 20

Brad Smith and Haley Smith and * Memorandum Opinion by Stretcher , J.

Rolling Plains Funeral Homes, Inc. (Panel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

d/b/a Smith Family Funeral Home, Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment )

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reversed

, and the cause is remanded for

further proceedings. The costs incu rred by reason of this appeal are taxed

against Lee Ann Colbert

.
#### Glen HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CUMMINS APPLIANCE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-1237.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 17, 2001.

Decided May 23, 2001.

Glen Hall, pro se. Andrew Radding, Russell Gable Alion, Jr., Adelberg, Rudow, Dorf, Hendler & Sameth, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Glen Hall appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Defendant in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Hall v. Cummins Appliance,*No. CA-00-1405-S (D.Md. Jan. 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 4.2


 


 


 


FIRST AMENDMENT


TO


AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


OF


AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL RETAIL II OPERATING
PARTNERSHIP, L.P.


 


This FIRST
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL RETAIL II OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P. (this “Amendment”),
is made as of May 29, 2015 by AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL—RETAIL CENTERS OF AMERICA II, INC., a Maryland corporation,
as general partner (the “General Partner”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise
defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership,
dated as of September 25, 2014 (the “Partnership Agreement”).


 


RECITALS:


 


WHEREAS, the General Partner desires
to amend the Partnership Agreement to change the forfeiture provisions of the Class B Units; and


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16.2(a)(iv)
of the Partnership Agreement, the General Partner may in its sole discretion change the forfeiture provisions contained in Section
16.2(a) of the Partnership Agreement.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of
the premises made hereunder, and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:


 


		1.	Article 1 of the Partnership Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the term “Economic Hurdle” and its
                                                                  definition in their entirety.
	 	 	 
	 	2.	Section 16.2(a)(ii) of the Partnership Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following new Section 16.2(a)(ii)
is substituted in its place:



 




“(ii)One hundred percent (100%) of the outstanding Restricted Class B Units shall no longer
be subject to forfeiture and shall constitute “Unrestricted Class B Units” at such time as a Liquidity Event occurs;
provided, that the Advisor pursuant to the Advisory Agreement is providing services to the Partnership immediately prior
to the occurrence of the Liquidity Event, unless the failure to provide such services is attributable to a Termination Without
Cause.”


 


[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]


 



    	 



    	 



    


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned, intending to be legally bound hereby, have duly executed this Agreement as of the date and year first aforesaid.


 


GENERAL PARTNER:


 


AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL—RETAIL CENTERS OF AMERICA
II, INC.


 


 



	By:   	/s/ William M. Kahane	 
		Name:	William M. Kahane	 
		Title:	Chief Executive Officer	 



 


 





[Signature Page to First Amendment to Agreement
of Limited Partnership]
EXHIBIT 32.2


                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of 21st Century Technologies,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ended  December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Alvin L. Dahl, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 30, 2004


/s/ ALVIN L. DAHL
______________________________________
Alvin L. Dahl
Chief Financial Officer




A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN  PROVIDED TO 21st CENTURY  TECHNOLOGIES,  INC.
AND WILL BE RETAINED BY 21st CENTURY  TECHNOLOGIES,  INC.  AND  FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1848 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1848

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Office 
      of the President Pro Tempore Emeritus for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Office 
      of the President Pro Tempore Emeritus for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR SENATE, OFFICE OF 
              THE PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE EMERITUS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Senate, Office of the 
President Pro Tempore Emeritus for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 
$319,000.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ John K. GrelleName:
    
    John K. GrelleTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    November 17, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.2




SELECTICA, INC.




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the annual report of Selectica, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Todd Spartz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: June 29, 2010





/s/ TODD SPARTZTodd SpartzChief Financial Officer