78478 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 249 / Tuesday, December 30, 2014 / Notices 

International Trade Commission, on 

December 22, 2014, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain graphics 

processing chips, systems on a chip, and 

products containing the same by reason 

of infringement of one or more of claims 

1–4, 6, and 19–21 of the ’385 patent; 

claim 10 of the ’349 patent; claims 1, 2, 

4, 19, 20, and 22 of the ’776 patent; and 

claims 1–3, 7–9, 12–15, 17, and 19 of 

the ’734 patent, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the 

presiding administrative law judge shall 

take evidence or other information and 

hear arguments from the parties and 

other interested persons with respect to 

the public interest in this investigation, 

as appropriate, and provide the 

Commission with findings of fact and a 

recommended determination on this 

issue, which shall be limited to the 

statutory public interest factors set forth 

in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1); 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainants are: 

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 129, 

Samsung-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si, 

Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea 443– 

742. 

Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC, 

12100 Samsung Boulevard, Austin, 

TX 78754. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

NVIDIA Corporation, 701 San Tomas 

Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050. 

Biostar Microtech International Corp., 2 

Floor, No. l08–2 Min Chuan Road, 

Hsin Tien District, New Taipei, 231, 

Taiwan. 

Biostar Microtech (U.S.A.) Corp., 18551 

Gale Avenue, City of Industry, CA 

91748–1338. 

Elitegroup Computer Systems Co. Ltd., 

No. 239, Sec. 2, Ti Ding Blvd., Taipei, 

Taiwan 11493. 

Elitegroup Computer Systems, Inc., 

6851 Mowry Avenue, Newark, CA 

94560. 

EVGA Corp., 2900 Saturn Street, Suite 

B, Brea, CA 92821. 

Fuhu, Inc., 909 North Sepulveda 

Boulevard, El Segundo, CA 90245. 

Jaton Corp., 47677 Lakeview Boulevard, 

Fremont, CA 94538. 

Mad Catz, Inc., 7480 Mission Valley 

Road, San Diego, CA 92108. 

OUYA, Inc., 1316 3rd Street, Santa 

Monica, CA 90401. 

Sparkle Computer Co., Ltd., 5F.–7, No. 

79, Section l, Xı ̄nta ́iwu ̆ Rd, Sijhih 

District, New Taipei City 221, Taiwan. 

Toradex, lnc., 219 lst Avenue, Seattle, 

WA 98109. 

Wikipad, Inc., 2625 Townsgate Road, 

Suite 330, Westlake Village, CA 

91361. 

ZOTAC International (MCO) Ltd, 18–24 

Shan Mei Street, Fo Tan, Shatin, New 

Territories, Hong Kong. 

ZOTAC USA, Inc., 5793 McCully Street, 

Chino, CA 91710. 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

Issued: December 23, 2014. 

By order of the Commission. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–30484 Filed 12–29–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–942] 

Certain Wireless Devices, Including 

Mobile Phones and Tablets III; 

Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

November 24, 2014, under section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 

19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Pragmatus 

Mobile, LLC of Alexandria, Virginia. 

The complaint alleges violations of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain wireless devices, including 

mobile phones and tablets, by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. 8,466,795 (‘‘the ‘795 patent’’). 

The complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337. 

The complainants request that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

limited exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

http://www.usitc.gov. The public record 

for this investigation may be viewed on 

the Commission’s electronic docket 

(EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 249 / Tuesday, December 30, 2014 / Notices 78479 

1Electronic Document Information System 

(EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov. 

2United States International Trade Commission 

(USITC): http://edis.usitc.gov. 

3Electronic Document Information System 

(EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Office of the Secretary, Dockets Services 

Division, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2014). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

December 22, 2014, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain wireless devices, 

including mobile phones and tablets, by 

reason of infringement of one or more of 

claims 1–25 and 27–33 of the ‘795 

patent, and whether an industry in the 

United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Pragmatus 

Mobile, LLC, 601 King Street, Suite 

200, Alexandria, VA 22314 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties 

upon which the complaint is to be 

served: ASUSTeK Computer, Inc., 

No. 15, Li-Te Road, Peitou District, 

Taipei 112, Taiwan 

ASUS Computer International, Inc., 800 

Corporate Way, Fremont, CA 94539 

ASUS Technology Pte. Ltd., 15A Changi 

Business Park Central 1, #05–01, 

Eightrium, Singapore, 486035, 

Singapore 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations will not participate as a 

party in this investigation. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondent in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 23, 2014. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–30485 Filed 12–29–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Receipt of Complaint; 

Solicitation of Comments Relating to 

the Public Interest 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has received a complaint 

entitled Certain Network Devices, 

Related Software and Components 

Thereof (I), DN 3045; the Commission is 

soliciting comments on any public 

interest issues raised by the complaint 

or complainant’s filing under section 

210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.8(b)). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa 

R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 

20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The 

public version of the complaint can be 

accessed on the Commission’s 

Electronic Document Information 

System (EDIS) at EDIS,1 and will be 

available for inspection during official 

business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) 

in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server at United 

States International Trade Commission 

(USITC) at USITC.2 The public record 

for this investigation may be viewed on 

the Commission’s Electronic Document 

Information System (EDIS) at EDIS.3

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission has received a complaint 

and a submission pursuant to section 

210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure filed on behalf 

of Cisco Systems, Inc. on December 19, 

2014. The complaint alleges violations 

of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 

(19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into 

the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain network devices, related 

software and components thereof (I). 

The complaint names as respondents 

Arista Networks, Inc. of Santa Clara, CA. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission issue a limited exclusion 

order, cease and desist orders, and a 

bond upon respondents’ alleged 

infringing articles during the 60-day 

Presidential review period pursuant to 

19 U.S.C. 1337(j). 

Proposed respondents, other 

interested parties, and members of the 

public are invited to file comments, not 

to exceed five (5) pages in length, 

inclusive of attachments, on any public 

interest issues raised by the complaint 

or section 210.8(b) filing. Comments 

should address whether issuance of the 

relief specifically requested by the 

complainant in this investigation would 

affect the public health and welfare in 

the United States, competitive 

conditions in the United States 

economy, the production of like or 

directly competitive articles in the 

United States, or United States 

consumers. 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 

(i) Explain how the articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

remedial orders are used in the United 

States; 

(ii) identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES