alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1910 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1910

 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Joint Items, 
                 Botanic Gardens for fiscal years 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Joint Items, 
                 Botanic Gardens for fiscal years 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR JOINT ITEMS, BOTANIC 
              GARDENS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Joint Items, Botanic 
Gardens for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $14,759,000.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES
                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

                           FORM 10-Q

            QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
              OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


           For the Quarter ended September 30, 1998

              Commission file number     33-24537


            CENTURY PACIFIC TAX CREDIT HOUSING FUND II
      (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


          CALIFORNIA                       95-4178283
(State of other jurisdiction of            (IRS Employer
incorporation of organization)             Identification Number)


1925 Century Park East, Suite 1760
Los Angeles, CA                            90067
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code:
(800) 262-8242


No Change
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year if changed
since last report)


Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.


Yes  [x]          No  [ ]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glenn Ray ALCORN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-5635.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 12, 2001.

Before MARTIN, Chief Judge; MOORE, Circuit Judge; and TARNOW,* District Judge.

The Honorable Arthur J. Tarnow, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

*ORDER*

This federal prisoner appeals a district court judgment denying his motion for transcripts of his criminal trial at government expense under 28 U.S.C. § 753(f). The case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

In 1998, Glenn Alcorn was named in a multiple count indictment in connection with a methamphetamine distribution conspiracy. A jury found Alcorn guilty of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and two counts of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Al-corn has filed a direct appeal from his judgment of conviction in Case No. 99-6565 and an appeal from an order denying his motion for a copy of counsel’s expense voucher in Case No. 00-5471.

In the instant case, Alcorn seeks to appeal the denial of his motion for transcripts under 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) of his criminal trial so he could file a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate. The district court denied the motion by marginal notation. The parties have filed briefs. Al-corn moves for miscellaneous relief.

Upon review, we conclude that the district court properly denied Alcorn’s motion because Alcorn simply does not have a right to a transcript at government expense under 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) in order to search the transcript for yet unasserted grounds in a motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. *See United*
      *249
      *States v. Losing,*601 F.2d 351, 352 (8th Cir.1979) (per curiam) (no right to free transcript before motion to vacate is filed); *Bentley v. United States,*431 F.2d 250, 254 (6th Cir.1970) (a case and nonfrivolous issue must exist to warrant a free transcript under § 753(f)); *see also United States v. MacCollom,*426 U.S. 317, 325-29, 96 S.Ct. 2086, 48 L.Ed.2d 666 (1976) (requirements in § 753(f) for a free transcript do not violate the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses).

Accordingly, we hereby deny Alcorn’s motion for miscellaneous relief and affirm the district court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### December 28, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 134815 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 134815 COA: 277613 Wayne CC: 00-011373-01 HAROLD SHAW, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 17, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

p1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2007

Clerk
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 20397 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ALI MAH MOOD AWAD IRSAN, also known as Ali Irsan , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:14

- CR

- 248

- 1

Before JONES , CLEMENT , and OWEN , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Ali Mahmood Awad Irsan has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Irsan h a s not filed a respo nse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 21 , 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-20397 Document: 00513556241 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016No. 15

- 20397

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-20397 Document: 00513556241 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
Order entered October 30, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00461-CV

CREDITPLEX AUTO SALES, LLC D/B/A GREENVILLE MITSUBISHI AND LARRY 

JACKSON, Appellants

V.

CHRISTIN BISHOP, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-01838-D

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s October 26, 2017 unopposed motion for second extension 

of time to file brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than 

November 13, 2017. We caution appellee that further extension requests will be disfavored. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Matrix Energy Services Corporation (the "Company"), on Form
10-QSB, as amended, for the period ending September, 30, 2002 (the "Report"), I,
Joe Bill Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joe Bill Bennett, Chief Executive Officer

February 15, 2005



<PAGE>


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Matrix Energy Services Corporation (the "Company"), on Form
10-QSB, as amended, for the period ending September, 30, 2002 (the "Report"), I,
Mark S. Zouvas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/
-----------------------------------------------------
Mark S. Zouvas, Chief Financial Officer

February 15, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KAREN PADGETT BROWN, )

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-00343-KD-C

 ) 

MOBILE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, )

et al., )

Defendants. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no objections 

filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(l)(B) and dated February 23, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant Mobile County Commissioners’ motion to 

dismiss (Doc. 9) is GRANTED such that all of the Plaintiff’s remaining claims against Defendant 

Mobile County Commissioners are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED this the 26th day of March 2015. 

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00343-KD-C Document 27 Filed 03/30/15 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30215]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8981]


In the Matter of the Designation of Ajnad Misr, Also Known as 
Egypt's Soldiers, Also Known as Soldiers of Egypt, Also Known as Ajnad 
Masr, as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 
1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the entity known as Ajnad Misr, also 
known as Egypt's Soldiers, also known as Soldiers of Egypt, also known 
as Ajnad Masr, committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, 
acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the 
national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: December 11, 2014.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-30215 Filed 12-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
April 2, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the
periods covered by the Report.
 /s/ Thomas P. KealyThomas P. Kealy
Vice President, Corporate Controller
and Chief Accounting Officer (principal
financial and accounting officer)
#### Ina C. Hughes, Appellant, *v.*Monroe M. Goldstein, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

February 12, 1925.

Landlord and tenant — action for rent of premises from which tenant was dispossessed for non-payment of rent — final order of dispossession conclusive as against tenant’s claim of constructive eviction — -tenant not entitled to amount deposited as security for rent.

A final order obtained by the plaintiff, landlord, against the defendant, tenant, by default for non-payment of the rent of the premises, in an action by the landlord to recover rent for two months’ occupancy of an apartment, is conclusive as against the tenant’s defense of constructive eviction or surrender and acceptance prior to the accrual of the rent for the non-payment of which the final order was entered.

Moreover, the tenant is not entitled to be credited with the amount deposited as security under the lease for the last month’s rent, where the lease provides that the tenant covenants to pay any deficiencies in rent in the event and after he may be dispossessed, and that the security is to be applied to the payment of the last month’s rent when due.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District, in favor of defendant, after a trial by a judge without a jury.

*Henry Goldstein,*for the appellant.

*Kendler & Goldstein [Julius Kendler*of counsel], for the respondent.

Per Curiam:

This action was brought to recover the rent of an apartment for the months of June and July, 1924, the same being payable on the first of each month in advance.

Plaintiff put in evidence a final order obtained against the defendant by default by reason of -the non-payment of the rent of the same two months in which the precept was dated July tenth and the order entered on July seventeenth. This, of course, on familiar principles, was conclusive on the' defendant’s present contention of either constructive eviction or surrender and acceptance prior to the accrual of the rent for the non-payment of which the final order was entered. *(Reich*v. *Cochran,*151 N. Y. 122; *McCotter*v. Flinn, 30 Misc. 119.)

*519The defendant’s further claim that he is entitled to be credited with $120 which he deposited with the landlord under the lease *“*as security for the last month’s rent ” is not sustained by the terms of the lease which read *“*as security for the faithful performance of the covenants of the lease and to be applied to the payment of the last month’s rent when due.” Under the 8th paragraph of the lease, however, the tenant covenants to pay any deficiencies in rent in the event and after he may be dispossessed. This in itself warrants the retention of the security by the landlord.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff as prayed for in the complaint and dismissing the counterclaim.

All concur; present, Bijur, Mullan and Cotillo, JJ.
Sprint Corp 10-K Exhibit 10.75 2014






Exhibit 10.75




Sandra J. Price
SVP Human Resources
Mailstop: KSOPHF0310
6200 Sprint Parkway
Overland Park, KS 66251




October 24, 2014




Mr. Junichi Miyakawa


2-21-10 Kikukawa
Sumida-Ku Toyko 130-0004
 Japan


Dear Junichi,


On behalf of Marcelo Claure, I am pleased to extend an employment offer to you for the position of Technical Chief Operating Officer reporting to Marcelo Claure under the terms described in this letter and pursuant to the cost arrangement agreement between SoftBank BB Corporation and Sprint Corporation. Your start date will be November 1, 2014 (contingent upon entry date into the Unites States).


Your annual net base salary will be 13,978,956 JPN.  Thirty percent will be paid monthly in US dollars (at current monetary conversion rates) while the remaining seventy percent will be paid monthly in Japanese yen.   Your benefits will generally be provided pursuant to the SoftBank International Assignment Policy


Your principal office will be located at the corporate headquarters in Overland Park, KS. 


Once you report to work, you will have access to the New Employee Website - a one stop resource to obtain a variety of information to assist you in understanding Sprint’s benefits, workplace support, and an overview of the company. You will find the New Employee Website online at http://suonline.corp.sprint.com/newhire.  


The Federal Immigration and Naturalization Service regulations require that all new employees verify eligibility for employment in the United States within the first three days of employment. Please be prepared to provide the required acceptable documentation, as indicated on the attached "List of Acceptable Documents", to your hiring manager. Your employment may be terminated if you do not provide such proof within the applicable time frame
    
Additionally, through the online Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Agreement, you must certify that you understand and will comply with the Sprint Employment Agreement regarding proprietary information, critical systems and resources, property rights and business practices. 
 











Your employment at Sprint will be at-will, meaning there will be no agreement for employment of any particular nature for any particular period of time, and either you or Sprint can terminate your employment at any time and for any reason, with or without cause.


Please send a signed copy of this letter to me confirming your acceptance of this offer of employment.   Feel free to contact Jon Ebina , manager human resources at 913-315-1405 with questions. 
    
Congratulations Miyakawa-san! I look forward to working with you in meeting the exciting challenges and opportunities at Sprint.




Sincerely,


/s/ Sandy Price






C:    Marcelo Claure
Jon Ebina
Stephany Newport
    








/s/ Junichi Miyakawa                        10/31/2014                
Accepted                            Date
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30049]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-626-000]


North Energy Power, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of North Energy Power, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is January 6, 2015.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2d6b687f6e6243414443487e585d5d425f596d4b485f4e034a425b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="571112051418393b3e393204222727382523173132253479303821">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 17, 2014.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30049 Filed 12-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 24, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 24, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20I0229. FREDRICK JOINER v. DEKALB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

17CV11306