alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2053 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2053

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
 Treasury, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, Salaries 
                   and Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
 Treasury, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, Salaries 
                   and Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF 
              TREASURY, TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX 
              ADMINISTRATION, SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 
              2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Treasury, 
Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, Salaries and 
Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $170,250,000.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             716
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,746
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,716
<PP&E>                                          76,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 203,334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,455
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,128
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,250
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (133,577)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               160,746
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       405
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,646)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,646)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1542 

To prohibit Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro N. Mayorkas from 

flying on a Federal executive aircraft. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2023 

Ms. DE LA CRUZ (for herself, Ms. GREENE of Georgia, Mr. OGLES, Mr. VAN

ORDEN, Mrs. LUNA, and Mr. BIGGS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To prohibit Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro N. 

Mayorkas from flying on a Federal executive aircraft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mayorkas Must Fly 

5 Coach Until We Secure the Border Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, neither 

8 Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro N. Mayorkas 

9 nor any officer or official of the Office of the Secretary 

10 of the Department of Homeland Security may use a FedVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:25 Mar 24, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1542.IH H1542

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1542 IH

1 eral executive aircraft to fly for official work. Secretary 

2 Mayorkas and any other such officer or official shall fly 

3 commercial aircraft for official work until such time as— 

4 (1) Secretary Mayorkas submits to Congress a 

5 plan to— 

6 (A) reduce to fiscal year 2020 numbers 

7 U.S. Customs and Border Protection encoun8 ters and apprehensions of aliens who have un9 lawfully crossed the border; 

10 (B) place 90 percent of U.S. Border Patrol 

11 agents deployed, as of the date of the enact12 ment of this Act, in the field in duties such as 

13 patrol, rather than administrative duties such 

14 as transport, processing duties, and hospital 

15 watch; and 

16 (C) offer financial support and other re17 sources support for local communities and gov18 ernments, in consultation with stakeholders; 

19 and 

20 (2) the condition specified in paragraph (1)(A) 

21 has been achieved. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EX-10.34



 Exhibit 10.34 
  

			
	



		 Nassim Usman, Ph.D.
 Chief Executive
Officer
  
 T. +1.650.266.8674

E. nusman@catbio.com
  

27 April, 2012


 Harold E. Selick, Ph.D. 

Dear Barry: 
 I am pleased to confirm your role as an
Independent Director of Catalyst Biosciences, Inc. (“the Company”) Board of Directors effective 5 February, 2012. 
 While you are an
Independent Director, the Company will compensate you at the rate of $15,000 annually to be paid quarterly in the amount of $3,750. You will be responsible for any taxes with respect to these payments. The Company will continue to reimburse you for
all reasonable travel and out of pocket expenses incurred by you in performing Board activities. 
 If you have any questions please do not hesitate to
contact me. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	




	Nassim Usman, Ph.D.
	
	Chief Executive Officer
	
	cc: Stephen Thau

 CATALYST BIOSCIENCES, INC.  260 Littlefield Avenue  •  South San Francisco,
CA 94080  •  p 650.871.0761  •  f 650.871.2475  •  www.catbio.com
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATIONS
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Internet Initiative Japan Inc. (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form
20-F for the year ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 30, 2008

| |                                |                                                                 |  | 
| | ------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
| | Internet Initiative Japan Inc. |                                                                
| | /s/ Akihisa Watai              |                                                                
| | Name:                          | Akihisa Watai                                                   | 
| | Title:                         | Director, Chief Financial Officer and 
Chief Accounting
Officer | 
|
Exhibit 10.1 2Q2015






Exhibit 10.1






AMENDMENT NO. 4
TO THE
AARON’S, INC.
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN AND TRUST


This Amendment No. 4 is made and entered into this 23rd day of April, 2014, by Aaron’s, Inc. (the “Company”).
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Aaron’s, Inc. Employees Retirement Plan and Trust, as amended and restated effective as of December 31, 2010, and as subsequently amended from time to time (the “Plan”), for the exclusive benefit of its employees and their beneficiaries;
WHEREAS, Article X of the Plan permits the Company to amend the Plan from time to time; 
WHEREAS, the Company acquired Progressive Finance Holdings, LLC on April 15, 2014;
WHEREAS, in connection with such acquisition, Progressive Finance Holdings, LLC is an Affiliated Employer and an adopting Employer under the terms of the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan effective April 15, 2014, to provide certain Employees with service credit for employment with Progressive Finance Holdings, LLC prior to its acquisition.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
1.    A new paragraph shall be added to the end of Section 12.3 of the Plan, effective as of April 15, 2014, to read as follows:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in determining Hours of Service, Years of Service and any period of Employment for any purpose under the Plan, the period of a “Progressive Employee’s” employment with Progressive Finance Holdings, LLC prior to its acquisition by the Company shall be counted for all purposes under the Plan.  For purposes of this paragraph, a “Progressive Employee” is an Employee who was employed by Progressive Finance Holdings, LLC as of the date the Company acquired Progressive Finance Holdings, LLC.
Except as amended herein, the provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 4 to be executed by its duly authorized corporate officer and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed.
	
				
	 
	 
	 
	AARON’S, INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	By:
	/s/ D. Chad Strickland

	 
	 
	 
	D. Chad Strickland

	 
	 
	 
	Senior Vice President,

	 
	 
	 
	Associate Resources
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Barbara L. Gooch, Appellant. Paul A. Boronow, P.C., Respondent; Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[967 NYS2d 529]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 26, 2012, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked as a paralegal for the employer, a law firm, for approximately seven months before she was terminated for misconduct. Upon her application, claimant was found eligible for unemployment insurance benefits. The case was reopened following the employer’s failure to appear at the initial hearing and, after a hearing on the merits, the Administrative Law Judge ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirmed and this appeal ensued.

Upon our review of the record, which includes the employer’s proffered excuse for its nonappearance, we find no abuse of discretion in the decision to reopen the case (see 12 NYCRR 461.8; *Matter of Micara [Commissioner of Labor],*307 AD2d 568, 569 [2003]; *Matter of Albanese [Commissioner of Labor],*304 AD2d 945, 946 [2003]). The employer’s credible excuse was supported by the testimony of another employee, upon which the Board was entitled to rely notwithstanding its hearsay nature (see *Matter of Halper [Commissioner of Labor],*251 AD2d 875, 876 [1998]). Moreover, the employer applied to reopen the case almost immediately after missing the initial hearing *(compare Matter of Monroe [Commissioner of Labor],*59 AD3d 836, 837 [2009], *lv dismissed*13 NY3d 879 [2009]).

Turning to the merits, we find that the Board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence (see *Matter of Song [Commissioner of Labor],*105 AD3d 1241, 1241 [2013]; *Matter of Zaydman [Roman Roytberg, Inc., P.C.*— Commissioner *of La*
      *1293
      *bor],*87 AD3d 1192, 1193 [2011]). Specifically, the testimony of the employer’s president and that of the associate attorney and the office manager supported the Board’s finding that claimant failed to properly calendar a court appearance, changed the calender after her mistake was discovered and then lied to the employer about it. The testimony of the employer’s witnesses established that this was a crucial part of claimant’s job responsibilities and she had previously made a similar error for which she had been warned. Claimant’s testimony to the contrary, and any further inconsistencies in the testimony, presented credibility issues for the Board to resolve (see *Matter of Song [Commissioner of Labor],*105 AD3d at 1241; *Matter of Moran [Cartier*— Commissioner *of Labor], 95*AD3d 1586, 1586 [2012]; *Matter of Zaydman,*87 AD3d at 1193; *Matter of Schaffer [Byrne Dairy, Inc.*— Commissioner *of Labor],*54 AD3d 1111, 1112 [2008]).

Peters, P.J., Rose, Spain and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1958 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1958

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration 
                   Rural Health for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
   the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration 
                   Rural Health for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 
              AND HUMAN SERVICES, HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES 
              ADMINISTRATION RURAL HEALTH FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Health and 
Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration Rural 
Health for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $317,794,000.
                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

WARREN EMANUEL GEORGES

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 2016

[ April 29, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County ; William L. Roby , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2013CF000588A

.

Warren Emanuel Georges, Raiford, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., G ERBER and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed March 13, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-0150

Lower Tribunal No. 21-30463 CC

________________

Henry Tien,

Appellant,

vs.

Antonia F. Abad,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Jacqueline 

Woodward, Judge.

Henry Tien, in proper person.

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Scott A. Cole and Francesca M. Stein, 

for appellee.

Before EMAS, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ. 

PER CURIAM. 
2

Affirmed. See Kumar Corp. v. Nopal Lines, Ltd., 462 So. 2d 1178,

1183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (observing that the “real party in interest” is “the 

person in whom rests, by substantive law, the claim sought to be enforced”)

(quoting Author's Comment to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.210); Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.210(a))

(providing in pertinent part: “Every action may be prosecuted in the name of 

the real party in interest, but a personal representative, administrator, 

guardian, trustee of an express trust, a party with whom or in whose name a 

contract has been made for the benefit of another, or a party expressly 

authorized by statute may sue in that person's own name without joining the 

party for whose benefit the action is brought. All persons having an interest 

in the subject of the action and in obtaining the relief demanded may join as 

plaintiffs and any person may be made a defendant who has or claims an 

interest adverse to the plaintiff.”); LaFrance v. U.S. Bank Nat. Ass’n, 141 So. 

3d 754, 756 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (“A ‘plaintiff's lack of standing at the 

inception of the case is not a defect that may be cured by the acquisition of 

standing after the case is filed’ and cannot be established ‘retroactively by 

acquiring standing to file a lawsuit after the fact.’”) (quoting McLean v. JP 

Morgan Chase Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 79 So. 3d 170, 173 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)); 

Dickson v. Roseville Props., LLC, 198 So. 3d 48, 50-51 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)

(“For better or for worse, it is settled that it is not enough for the plaintiff to 
3

prove that it has standing when the case it tried; it must also prove that it had 

standing when the complaint was filed.”)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JEREMY BAYNE LYNCH, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0664-CG

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CRIMINAL NO. 13-0154-CG

)

Respondent )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant 

to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the 

recommendation to which objection is made, the recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated August 5, 2016, is ADOPTED

as the opinion of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED this 9th day of September, 2016.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cr-00154-CG-N Document 315 Filed 09/09/16 Page 1 of 1
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WEEKS MARINE, INC., et al., )

Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, ) 

 ) CIVIL ACTION 14-00231-KD-B

v. )

 ) 

BRANDON WRIGHT, )

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. )

JUDGMENT

In conjunction with the Order issued on this date, and as detailed therein:

1) ASI/Weeks’ request for entry of a DECLARATORY JUDGMENT concerning the 

commencement of payment of maintenance and cure to Wright is MOOT, but 

ASI/Weeks’ request for entry of a DECLARATORY JUDGMENT concerning future

maintenance and cure to Wright is GRANTED;

2) JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Wright and against ASI as to Wright’s Jones Act 

negligence claim; 

3) JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Wright and against Weeks as to Wright’s 

unseaworthiness claim; 

4) Wright’s past and future medical expense damages claims are DENIED;

5) Wright’s past lost wage damage claim is DENIED;

6) Wright’s future lost wage damage claim is DENIED;

7) Wright’s pain and suffering damages claim is GRANTED insofar as such damages are

awarded in favor of Wright and against Weeks and ASI, in the amount of $80,000; and

8) Wright’s maintenance and cure attorneys’ fees and punitive damages claims are 

DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED this the 15th day of July 2015.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00231-KD-B Document 64 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 10.20**SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS WITH DIRECTORS**     Our non-employee directors receive an annual retainer of $60,000 which is paid in quarterlyinstallments. They also receive $1,000 in cash plus expenses for each Board meeting or Committeemeeting they attend. In addition, they receive an annual stock option award to purchase 5,000shares of common stock having an exercise price equal to the fair market value of such shares onthe date of award under the provisions of our stock plans. However, in 2007, each non-employeedirector received cash in lieu of stock options that were issuable to each director but were notissued because the shares were not available under our stock plans. Options issued to non-employeedirectors vest one year from the date of grant and expire on the tenth anniversary of the date ofgrant.     We pay our Lead Director an additional $7,500 in cash, our Chairman of the Audit/Finance andInvestment Committee an additional $2,500 in cash, and our Chairman of the Leadership andCompensation Committee an additional $1,500 in cash.     Mr. Albert, as our non-executive Chairman, receives the same compensation paid to non-employeedirectors (other than committee meeting fees) plus an additional stipend of $50,000. He alsoparticipates in our benefit plans.     Mr. Brooker, as our President and Chief Executive Officer, does not receive additional orspecial compensation for serving as a director. In addition, Mr. Brooker will be entitled toreceive certain payments upon our change of control or his termination of employment.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00474

- CR

EX PARTE Wilmar Geovani Sambrano GUEVARA

From the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10373CR

Honorable Dennis Powell , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On August 15, 2022, we ordered the County Clerk of Kinney County to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing all items required to be in the clerk’s record, including orders signed on July 27, 2022 and a copy of the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right to appeal, by September 6, 2022. On Aug ust 30, 2022, the county clerk filed a notification of late record indicating he was waiting for the trial court to prepare the certification. We therefore

order the trial court to prepare a certification of defendant’s right of appeal in order for the

count y clerk to file the supplemental clerk’s record containing the required items by September 6, 2022.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of September, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court