alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Shelter
Properties I 1999 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000316220
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES I
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,328
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      299
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          20,965
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         11,286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,048)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,854
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,067
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,120
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       947
<EPS-BASIC>                                      62.53<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Treaty Energy Corporation (“Treaty Energy”) because it has not filed a periodic report since its Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2013. Treaty Energy is a Nevada corporation based in New Orleans, Louisiana, and its common stock is quoted on the OTC Link (previously “Pink Sheets”) operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc. under the ticker symbol TECO.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company.

*Therefore, it is ordered,*                     pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of Treaty Energy Corporation is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST on December 22, 2014, through 11:59 p.m. EST on January 6, 2015.                

By the Commission.

Jill M. Peterson,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-30296 Filed 12-22-14; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2136 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2136

 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
Agencies, Office of Personnel Management, Office of Inspector General, 
             Administrative Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
Agencies, Office of Personnel Management, Office of Inspector General, 
             Administrative Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR INDEPENDENT 
              AGENCIES, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, OFFICE OF 
              INSPECTOR GENERAL, ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES FOR FISCAL 
              YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Independent Agencies, 
Office of Personnel Management, Office of Inspector General, 
Administrative Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 
$25,265,000.
                                 <all>
```
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

DAVID W. MAYBERRY, Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.

____________________

2011-7136

______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 09-2229, Judge Alan G. Lance, Sr.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

K ENNETH M. C ARPENTER , Carpenter, Chartered, Topeka, Kansas, argued for claimant-appellant.

N ICHOLAS J ABBOUR , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. With him on the brief were T ONY W EST , Assistant Attorney General, J EANNE E. D AVIDSON
, Director, and M ARTIN F. H OCKEY , Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief were D AVID J. B ARRANS , Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and M ICHAEL G. D AUGHERTY
, Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST
, M OORE
, and W ALLACH
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

May 11, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge Carroll, Kelly, Trotter, Franzen, & McKenna Mandelbaum, Ellerton & Kolkoski Parker Scheer Lagomarsino E. Breen Arntz, Chtd. Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders Lauria Tokunaga Gates & Linn, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2

(0) 1947A e4
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global Diversified Industries,  Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),I,  Phil
Hamilton,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify to the best of my
knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Phil Hamilton
----------------------
Phil Hamilton
Chief Executive Officer
August 17, 2006
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 21

- 50641 Summary Calendar

United States of America,

Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus

Mario Ramirez

- Perez,

Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:19

- CR

- 227

- 1

Before King, Costa, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam : *

The attorney appointed to represent Mario Ramirez

- Perez has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramirez

- Perez has not filed a response. We have reviewed

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 14, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-50641 Document: 00516201294 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/14/2022No. 21

- 50641

2 counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED

. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2

. Case: 21-50641 Document: 00516201294 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/14/2022
**Exhibit        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        OF**

**CHIEF        FINANCIAL OFFICER OF CYTOMEDIX, INC.**

**PURSUANT        TO 18 U.S.C. §1350**

| 1.   | The                Company's 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.   | The                information contained in the Company's 10-KSB for the fiscal year                ended                December 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the                financial condition and results of operations of the Company for                said                period. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |                                     |
|---------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                               |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |                                |
| Date: March                23,                2006 | By:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | /s/ Andrew                S. Maslan |
|                                                    |  Andrew                S. Maslan  A        signed        original of this written statement has been provided to Cytomedix, Inc. and        will        be retained by Cytomedix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange        Commission or its staff upon request. |
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

AURELIA KING, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-0780-CG-M

)

WAL-MART STORES, INC., )

WILLIAM DARCY, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to remand (Doc. 20) and defendants’

response thereto (Doc. 22). The motion to remand included the following:

1. Plaintiff agrees not to seek judgment against Defendants in the Circuit Court of Dallas

County, Alabama, in excess of Seventy-Five Thousand ($75,000.00) Dollars, exclusive

of interests and costs.

(Doc. 20). Defendant concedes that if the above is accepted as a statement by plaintiff, made subject

to the provisions of FED.R.CIV.P 11, “it would appear that remand of this action to the Circuit Court of

Dallas County is appropriate.” (Doc. 22). The court finds that the above statement, submitted by

plaintiff, is subject to Rule 11. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to remand is GRANTED and this case

is hereby REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Dallas County.

DONE and ORDERED this 30th day of June, 2005. 

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00780-CG-M Document 23 Filed 06/30/05 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4668 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4668

 To designate the third floor of the Ellis Island Immigration Museum, 
located on Ellis Island in New York Harbor, as the ``Bob Hope Memorial 
                               Library''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2004

Mr. Engel (for himself and Mr. Gallegly) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the third floor of the Ellis Island Immigration Museum, 
located on Ellis Island in New York Harbor, as the ``Bob Hope Memorial 
                               Library''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The third floor of the Ellis Island Immigration Museum, located on 
Ellis Island in New York Harbor, shall be known and designated as the 
``Bob Hope Memorial Library''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the third floor of the Ellis Island 
Immigration Museum referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``Bob Hope Memorial Library''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1725 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 501(c)(3) 

organizations from providing direct funding to official election organizations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2023 

Ms. TENNEY (for herself, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. TIFFANY, Mr. FITZGERALD, 

Mrs. BOEBERT, Mr. COLE, Mr. MOORE of Alabama, Mr. NORMAN, Mrs. 

MILLER of Illinois, Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina, Mr. GOSAR, and Mr. 

POSEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 

501(c)(3) organizations from providing direct funding 

to official election organizations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘End Zuckerbucks 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1725 IH

1 SEC. 2. 501(c)(3) ORGANIZATIONS PROHIBITED FROM PRO2 VIDING DIRECT FUNDING TO ELECTION OR3 GANIZATIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘and which does not partici7 pate’’ and inserting ‘‘which does not participate’’, 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert10 ing ‘‘, and which does not provide below-cost serv11 ices, scholarships, subsidies, or direct, in-kind, or in12 direct funding to official election organizations, in13 cluding any State or local government entity or any 

14 government election organization.’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall apply to funding provided in taxable 

17 years beginning after December 31, 2023. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2


                                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         I, James Anderson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting of
Matrix Energy Services Corporation. ("the Registrant") do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, based upon the
review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 14,  2007       /s/ James Anderson
                              James Anderson
                              Chief Executive Officer
                              And Principal Accounting Officer



* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 29, 2014

p0721

Order 

Clerk

July 29, 2014

148370(18)

JAMES OLDHAM,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

IRON WORKERS’ HEALTH FUND OF

EASTERN MICHIGAN,

Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148370

COA: 314937

MCAC: 12-000077

A.J. STEEL ERECTORS, L.L.C. and

FRANKENMUTH MUTUAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellants, 

and

WOODRUFF CONTRACTING, INC. and

SECURA INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 28, 

2014 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
J.

responded to this court's order. Thus, as a result of appellants' failure to demonstrate that we have jurisdiction and to substitute a party for Juanita P. Terry, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.


## blett t‘'e 4 A 2 N J Hardesty
J. Parraguirre

cc: Hon. Doug Smith, District Judge Carolyn Worrell, Settlement Judge Aaron & Paternoster, Ltd. Olson, Cannon, Gormley, Angulo & Stoberski Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
#### John P. Clark v. Delos E. Rice.

*Contract of purchase*— Wwrranty—Befusai *of instructions.*

A contract for a machine if it is “satisfactory or does what is claimed for it *”*is binding if the machine meets the warranty, whether the purchaser is satisfied or not.

The refusal of a charge is not error where it is substantially given in an instruction of greater scope and more favorable to the plaintiff in error.

Error to Wayne.

Submitted June 15.

Decided June 22.

Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

Affirmed.

*R. A. Parker*for plaintiff in error.

A contract to pay for an article if the purchaser is satisfied with it leaves it with the latter to decide whether he is suited: *Gibson v. Cranage*39 Mich. 49; *Brown v. Foster*113 Mass. 136 ; *Tyler v. Ames*6 Lans. 280; *McCarren v. McNulty*7 Gray 139.

*Griffin, Dickinson, Thurber & Hosmer*for defendant in error.

Campbell, J.

The controversy in this case arises out of a claim for a patent heater, which was sold to Clark on a contract which contained this provision: “ If on trial of 30 days the machine is satisfactory, or does what is claimed for it, will pay 15 dollars per inch diameter of my engine. The machine to be your property until paid for according to agreement as follows: Cash $210, four months from attaching.” This clause gave rise to the dispute.

There is a great deal of evidence on both sides and quite contradictory, but no complaint is made of admission or rejection. The case is brought up on the charges.

It is first claimed that under this contract Clark could reject the heater if not satisfactory to him, whether it met the warranty or not. This we think was not what the con*309tract required. That very clearly binds him to pay, whether satisfied or not, if the machine did what was claimed for it.

Upon the remainder of the charges we think there was no error. There was certainly evidence which was for the jury to act upon if they believed it, that Rice had complied with his contract, and in the conflict the facts were for them to decide.

The same remark will apply to the refusal to charge that certain changes and repairs were evidence of bad order in January. This was controverted by witnesses.

All of the defendant’s other charges were given except one which was we think substantially given in another, which held that unless the conditions were all fully and strictly performed there was no sale. The charge not given was less extensive and less favorable. This instruction, with others in the same direction, made it impossible for plaintiff to recover unless the jury found there was no default whatever.

The judgment must be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.