alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lawrence B. WHITENER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO, Appellees.

No. 00-5261.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 24, 2001.

Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge; RANDOLPH and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occa*3sion no need for an opinion. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed September 17, 1998 and June 13, 2000 be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in the memoranda filed the same dates.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of  CreditRiskMonitor.com,  Inc. ("CRM")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Lawrence
Fensterstock,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                            By: /s/ Lawrence Fensterstock
                                                    Lawrence Fensterstock
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

May 16, 2005


                                       36
#### Emiliana Nunez et al., Respondents, v Wah Kok Realty Corp., Appellant.

[973 NYS2d 558]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered April 18, 2013, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly denied. Triable issues of fact exist as to whether the large, spreading Christmas tree on which plaintiff tripped was an open and obvious and not inherently dangerous condition *(see Centeno v Regine’s Originals,*5 AD3d 210, 211 [1st Dept 2004]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2013 NY Slip Op 30782OJ).]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 28, 2013

s0520 

# Order

Clerk May 28, 2013

146682

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146682

COA: 311305

Wayne CC: 11

- 010965

- FC

TERRY PANTAZ DURR,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2012

or der of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### William G. Woods *v.*William Woods.

Real Estate — Recovery of Purchase Price.

When land is to he paid for at the time the amount thereof is ascertained by survey, no interest is collectable prior to survey.

Power of Vendor.

Where land is to be paid for at the time the amount thereof is ascertained by survey, the vendor has it in his power to have the land surveyed at any time; and if he' fail to do so promptly, and thereby secure the principal and interest, it is his own fault.

APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

June 19, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

On February 27, 1859, William Woods, by writing, construed to sell to William G. Woods a small tract of land, described in the *7writing at the price of $25 per acre, in three equal annual payments after the land was surveyed. Suit was brought by William Woods to coerce the payment of the purchase price of the land by an enforcement of the vendor’s lien.

*Munday & Parson, for appellant.*

*J. G. Wilson, for appellee.*

The principal defense relied on is that the plaintiff below was indebted to the defendant, both before and after said contract was made, for labor performed at his request and for him; that he was to be credited on the price of the land for labor which he had theretofore performed for, and at the request of plaintiff, and for such as he should perform for him afterwards; and that he had performed labor at a fair compensation sufficient to pay the purchase money.

No survey of the land appears to have been made until June 3, 1873, when it was surveyed under an order of court and found to contain 23^ acres; and in July, 1873, judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff for $581.25, being $25 per acre for the 23J4 acres found to be in the tract, and interest from the date of the judgment for the costs of the suit, and for a sale of the land on credits of six and twelve months on failure of the defendant to pay the money into court on or before August 1, 1873. From that judgment William G. Woods has appealed, and William Woods prosecutes a cross appeal.

If, as is alleged in the answer, appellant had the privilege of paying for the land, and had, in fact, paid a part of the price by labor performed for plaintiff, he should have had it inserted in the writing; and his failure to have the amount of appellee’s indebtedness ascertained at the date of the contract, and a credit for it given, or some statement made in relation thereto, at the time, is a circumstance unfavorable to his claim. But, besides, his evidence of the labor performed by him for his vendor, is too vague and uncertain, both as to time and value, to be the basis of judicial action.

On the subject of the cross appeal, it is sufficient to say that, by the terms of the contract,, the times of payment were to date from the making of the survey of the land; and if the running of interest is deferred to the period of the survey, appellee cannot be heard to complain, as the remedy was in his own hands.

Judgment *affirmed*on the original and cross appeal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                38,019
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            259
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                               35
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      42,976
<PP&E>                                                 6,431
<DEPRECIATION>                                           247
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        49,160
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 13,222
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                 204
<OTHER-SE>                                            35,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          49,160
<SALES>                                               13,638
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      13,638
<CGS>                                                  7,594
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         36,146
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       (9)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (30,093)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             108
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (30,201)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (30,201)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (2.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (2.05)



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1967 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1967

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
 Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
               Environmental Health for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
 Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
               Environmental Health for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 
              AND HUMAN SERVICES, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND 
              PREVENTION ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Health and 
Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
Environmental Health for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $192,350,000.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT 
 TO 

HOME BANCSHARES, INC. 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 

2006 STOCK OPTION AND PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN 

Section 6.4 of the Amended and Restated 2006 Stock Option and Performance Incentive Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows: 
 6.4 Exercise of Options. An Option may be exercised, in whole or in part, at such time or times as the Committee shall determine.
The Committee may, in its discretion, accelerate the exercisability of any Option at any time. Options may be exercised by an Employee by giving written notice to the Committee stating the number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which the
Option is being exercised and tendering payment therefor. Payment for the Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Option shall be made in full (a) in cash, (b) by certified check, (c) if the Committee, in its sole discretion,
permits (i) in shares of Common Stock (valued at fair market value on the date of exercise and which shall have been held for more than 6 months) or (ii) pursuant to a “net exercise” arrangement pursuant to which the Company will
reduce the number of shares of Common Stock issued upon exercise by the largest whole number of shares with a fair market value that does not exceed the aggregate option price; provided, however, that the Company shall accept a cash or other payment
from the Employee to the extent of any remaining balance of the aggregate option price not satisfied by such reduction in the number of whole shares to be issued, or (d) by a combination of the foregoing methods. As soon as reasonably
practicable following such exercise, a certificate representing the shares of Common Stock purchased, registered in the name of the Employee, shall be delivered to the Employee. 

APPROVED by the Board of Directors of Home BancShares, Inc. at the special meeting duly called and held June 15, 2015. 

 

	
	 /s/ Holly McKenna

	Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          52,233
<SECURITIES>                                 2,582,951
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,586
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,069,886
<PP&E>                                          72,385
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,795,452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,951
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        94,483
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,652,510
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,795,452
<SALES>                                        124,944
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               730,411
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               137,840
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                592,571
<INCOME-TAX>                                   208,062
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            384,509
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   384,509
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.11 2Q2015








Exhibit 10.11


Grants under 2001 Plan
SCHEDULE 2
Amendment to Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement
Section 2.3 of the Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement is amended to read as follows:


Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Agreement, in the event of a Change in Control followed within two years by (A) a termination of the Grantee’s employment by the Company without Cause prior to the date all RSUs have vested, or (B) initiation of the Good Reason Process by written notice of a Good Reason condition by the Grantee to the Company which subsequently results in a termination of the Grantee’s employment by the Grantee for Good Reason prior to the date all RSUs have vested, the unvested RSUs shall become fully vested and nonforfeitable as of the date of the Grantee’s termination of employment.  For purposes of this Agreement, (1) Change in Control shall have the meaning set forth in the Plan modified as follows: (i) in Plan Section 2.6(a), “50 percent” shall be replaced by “35 percent”, (ii) the final proviso of Plan Section 2.6(a) that begins “and provided, however” shall be deleted, and (iii) Plan Section 2.6(d) shall be deleted; provided that, if the RSUs are subject to Code Section 409A and a change in the time or form of payment in settlement of the RSUs would occur as a result of a Change in Control, then no Change in Control shall be deemed to have occurred unless the event would also constitute a change in ownership of the Company, a change in effective control of the Company, or a change in ownership of a substantial portion of the Company’s assets under Code Section 409A; (2) Good Reason shall mean that Grantee has complied with the Good Reason Process following the occurrence of any of the following events or actions: (i) any material reduction in Grantee’s base salary, unless a similar reduction is made in the base salary of all similarly situated executives, (ii) any material reduction in Grantee’s authority, duties or responsibilities, (iii) any material change in the geographic location at which Grantee must perform his duties, or (iv) any material breach of any written agreement with the Company by the Company; and (3) Good Reason Process shall mean that (i) Grantee reasonably determines in good faith that a Good Reason condition has occurred, (ii) Grantee notifies the Company in writing of the first occurrence of the Good Reason condition within 60 days of the first occurrence of such condition, (iii) Grantee cooperates in good faith with the Company’s efforts, for a period not less than 30 days following such notice (the “Cure Period”) to remedy the condition, (iv) notwithstanding such efforts, the Good Reason condition continues to exist, and (v) Grantee terminates employment within 60 days after the end of the Cure Period; provided, however, if the Company cures the Good Reason condition during the Cure Period, Good Reason shall be deemed not to have occurred.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2078 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The Judiciary, Supreme 

Court, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The 

Judiciary, Supreme Court, Salaries and Expenses for 

fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 THE JUDICIARY, SUPREME COURT, SALARIES 

5 AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:38 Apr 17, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2078.IH H2078

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2078 IH

1 able for The Judiciary, Supreme Court, Salaries and Ex2 penses for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $84,703,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1

 



 

June 2, 2015

 

 

By Email

 

Jim Waltz

Chief Executive Officer

Beanstock Media, Inc.

530 Howard Street, Suite 210

San Francisco, CA 94105

 

Re: Notice of Termination

 

Dear Jim: 

 

Effective immediately, we hereby terminate our Desktop Agreement and our Mobile Advertising Agreement as follows: 

 

	 	
1.
	
Desktop Agreement. Effective immediately, we hereby terminate our Media Publisher Agreement dated as of September 23, 2013 (the “Desktop Agreement”). We will send a final invoice with respect to the Desktop Agreement separately in accordance with its terms. 



 

	 	
2.
	
Mobile Agreement. Effective immediately, we hereby terminate our Advertising Agreement dated as of December 23, 2014 (as amended, the “Mobile Agreement”) for “Cause” (as defined in the “Term and Termination” section thereof). We will send a final invoice with respect to the Mobile Agreement separately in accordance with its terms, which will include $4,000,000 in “MeetMe Liquidated Damages” as defined in the “Liquidated Damages” section of the Mobile Agreement as amended March 26, 2015. 



 

	
 
	
Sincerely,

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
/s/ Fred Beckley

	
 
	
Fred Beckley



 

 

 

 

 

 

cc: Joe Lyons, Omar Akram
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1555 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 457
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1555

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2024

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             August 1, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2300 Sylvan Avenue in Modesto, California, as the ``Corporal Michael 
                D. Anderson Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORPORAL MICHAEL D. ANDERSON JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2300 Sylvan Avenue in Modesto, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Corporal Michael D. Anderson Jr. Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Michael D. Anderson Jr. Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 457

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1555

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2300 Sylvan Avenue in Modesto, California, as the ``Corporal Michael 
                D. Anderson Jr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 1, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1936 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Labor, 

Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Labor, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OFFICE OF FED5 ERAL CONTRACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS 

6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Department of Labor, Office of Federal Contract 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1936 IH

1 Compliance Programs for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $103,476,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB