alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|   | 1. | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March      31, 2008, (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,      as amended; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      May 9, 2008      |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |
|                         |   |
| /s/ Paul O. Koether          |   |
| Paul      O. Koether         |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|                         |   |
|                         |   |
| /s/ Bryan P. Healey          |   |
| Bryan      P. Healey         |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer |   |

----
#### Rosalind Silverstein, Appellant, v Marine Midland Trust Company of New York, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Trammel Crow Corporate Services, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (And Other Third-Party Actions.)

[828 NYS2d 131]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blackburne, J.), entered May 19, 2005, as, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability, is in favor of the defendants and against her dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

By failing to object to the charge as given, the plaintiff failed to preserve her contention that the court erred in instructing the jury on implied assumption of risk *(see*CPLR 4110-b; *Schlecter v Abbondadello, 5*AD3d 582, 583 [2004]; *O’Loughlin v Butler,*2 AD3d 605, 605-606 [2003], citing *Laboda v VJV Dev. Corp.,*296 AD2d 441 [2002] and *Surjnarine v Brathwaite,*290 AD2d 436 [2002]; *Hamilton v Raftopoulos,*176 AD2d 916, 917 [1991]; *cf. Schmidt v Buffalo Gen. Hosp.,*278 AD2d 827 [2000]). In any event, any error in charging the doctrine of implied assumption of risk was harmless and would not require reversal under the circumstances of this case. Following the court’s instructions and the special verdict form, the jury found that the defendants were not negligent. Thus, the jury never reached the issue of the plaintiffs comparative fault, which included assumption of risk as charged in this case *(see Braunsdorf v Haywood,*295 AD2d 731, 733 [2002] [citations omitted], citing *Dutcher v Fetcher,*183 AD2d 1052, 1054-1055 [1992]; *Mossidus v Hartley,*106 AD2d 805, 806 [1984]). Crane, J.P., Ritter, Lunn and Covello, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-30864

Conference Calendar

 

NAOMI SANDRES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

STATE OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL, ET AL.,

Defendants,

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL; ROSE WOODEN,

Defendants-Appellees

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:03-CV-712-C

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Naomi Sandres appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of Rose Wooden and the dismissal of her civil

claims against Wooden pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6). Her

claims against the other defendants in the lawsuit remain to be

adjudicated.
No. 04-30864

-2-

When an action involves multiple parties or multiple claims,

any decision that adjudicates the liability of fewer than all of

the parties does not terminate the action and is therefore not

appealable unless certified by the district court under FED.

R. CIV. P. 54(b). Borne v. A & P Boat Rentals No. 4, Inc., 755

F.2d 1131, 1133 (5th Cir. 1985); Thompson v. Betts, 754 F.2d

1243, 1245 (5th Cir. 1985). The district court has not certified

the order for appeal. Accordingly, this court is without

jurisdiction, and the appeal is dismissed.

We have previously dismissed an appeal filed by Sandres as

frivolous. See Sandres v. Div. of Admin., No. 02-31244 (5th Cir.

Aug. 19, 2003). Sandres is warned that sanctions may be imposed

if she continues to file appeals for which there is no

jurisdiction or that are frivolous. These sanctions may include

monetary sanctions and restrictions on her ability to file

pleadings.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-115700, 333-123962and 333-132588 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 16, 2007, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements and financial statement schedule of Blue Nile, Inc. (which report expresses anunqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the adoption of Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment*, and the initial application of theprovisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, *Considering the Effects of Prior YearMisstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current YearFinancial Statements)*and report ofmanagement on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Blue Nile, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006./S/Deloitte & Touche LLPSeattle, Washington
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 143 

To prohibit the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States 

Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. DUNCAN (for himself, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, and Mr. NORMAN) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the transfer or release of individuals detained 

at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, 

to the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OR RELEASE OF 

4 INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT UNITED STATES 

5 NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA, 

6 TO THE UNITED STATES. 

7 No amounts authorized to be appropriated or other8 wise made available for the Department of Defense for 

9 any fiscal year may be used to transfer, release, or assist 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 143 IH

1 in the transfer of or release to or within the United States, 

2 its territories, or possessions Khalid Sheikh Mohammed 

3 or any other detainee who— 

4 (1) is not a United States citizen or a member 

5 of the Armed Forces of the United States; and 

6 (2) is or was held on or after January 20, 

7 2009, at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo 

8 Bay, Cuba, by the Department of Defense. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
11792.

#### Bibb Manufacturing Company *v.*Hewell.

Decided March 16, 1921.

Hill, J.

The plaintiff, a widow, sought to recover damages on account of injuries to her minor son, alleging that the defendant corporation knowingly put him to work without her consent, in a different position from that in which, under the contract between her and the defendant, he was to be employed, and that he received the injuries as a consequence of such change of work. This issue was correctly presented to the jury, under the charge of the court, there being a conflict in the evidence, and the jury decided the issue in favor of the plaintiff. *Held:*

Where the father, or, in the case of the father’s death, the mother, hires a minor son to an employer to do certain work, and the employer, without such parent’s consent, puts the minor to a different and more dangerous employment, and the minor is injured in such employment, the employer is responsible to the parent for the consequent loss of the minor’s services. In such case the gravamen of the action is the alleged wrong of the defendant in putting the minor to work at the dangerous employment without the parent’s consent. Therefore contributory negligence of the minor is no defense to the action, and no issue as to the minor’s negligence is involved. *Braswell*v. *Garfield Cotton Oil Mill Co.,*7 *Ga. App.*167 (66 S. E. 539); Hendrickson *v.*L. & N. R. Co., 137 Ky. 562 (126 S. W. 117), and note to this case in 30 L. R. A. (N. S.) 311. It is not necessary to rule upon the other assignments of error, the case being entirely controlled by the foregoing ruling.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*

*509Action for damages; from Newton superior court — Judge Hutcheson. July 23, 1920.

*Rogers & Tuck, J. G. Knox,*for plaintiff in error.

*King & Johnson,*contra.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JAMES H. GOSSARD, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CA 14-0395-C

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, :

Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 

:

Defendant.

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on this date, it 

is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff be awarded 

attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,023.33 under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 

representing compensation for 5.50 hours of service by Colin E. Kemmerly, Esquire, at 

the cost-of-living-adjusted rate of $186.06, and court costs of $400.00; the total EAJA 

award due and owing plaintiff is $1,423.33.

DONE this the 27th day of August, 2015.

 s/WILLIAM E. CASSADY 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00395-C Document 28 Filed 08/28/15 Page 1 of 1
11218.

#### MOORE *v.*THE STATE.

1. “The ‘indeterminate-sentence act’ (Georgia Laws 1919, p. 387) did not repeal section 1062 of the Penal Code of 1910, which provides that on the recommendation of the jury trying the case, when such recommendation is approved by the presiding judge, the punishment for certain felonies shall be as provided for misdemeanors. The aforesaid act contains no express reference to the code-section. Repeals by implication are not favored, and a later statute will not be construed to repeal a prior act on the same subject where there is no irreconcilable repugnancy between the two. *Savannah River Terminal Co.*v. *Southern Ry. Co.,*148 *Ga.*180, 185 (96 S. E. 257); *Sims*v. *State,*7 *Ga. App.*852(1) (68 S. E. 493).” *Moore*v. *State,*150 *Ga.*679 (104 S. E. 907).

2. “ It was reversible error for the court to fail and refuse to charge- the jury on the trial of one charged with simple larceny (hog-stealing), that they could recommend, if they saw fit, that the defendant be punished as for a misdemeanor. *Johnson*v. *State,*100 *Ga.*78 (25 S. E. 940).” *Moore*v. *State,*supra.

Decided December 15, 1920.

Indictment for larceny of hog; from- Liberty superior court — Judge Sheppard. December 20, 1919.

*Ben. A. Way, J. P. Dukes,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. Saxton Daniel,*solicitor-general, contra.

Broyles, C. J.

In reply to questions certified by this court to the Supreme Court, that court, on November 12, 1920, answered as is set forth in the headnotes to this case. No merit appears in any of the other grounds of the motion for a new trial; but on account of the error stated in the second headnote, a new trial of the case is required.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Luke and Bloodworih, JJ., concur.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ALEX EARL TATE, *

(AIS # 182349) *

*

 Plaintiff, *

*

vs. * CIVIL ACTION NO.12-00593-WS-B

*

COREY SYKES, *

*

 Defendants. *

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be 

DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 56(a).

DONE this 30th of September, 2015.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00593-WS-B Document 41 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Litchfield Financial
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), we, Joseph J. Greco, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Carroll A. Pereira, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Joseph J. Greco                     /s/ Carroll A. Pereira
-------------------                     ----------------------
Joseph J. Greco                         Carroll A. Pereira
President and Chief Executive Officer   Principal Financial Officer
May 12, 2004                            May 12, 2004

The foregoing certificate is furnished solely for purposes of complying with
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and for no other purpose
whatsoever. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or in any
of the Company's previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate the
Company's future filings, including this Report on Form 10-QSB, in whole or in
part, this Certificate shall not be incorporated by reference into any such
filings.


                                       28
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 11, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00554

- CV

Charles J. MELNIK

, Appellant

v.

Dewayne BALDWIN and Tonia Baldwin, Appellees

From the County Court

, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- CV

- 0012 Honorable Bill Squires , Judge Presiding

ORDER

This appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. The costs of this appeal are taxed against appellant.

It is so ORDERED o n December 11, 2019

.

_____________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 11th da y of December, 2019

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 21.1



List of Subsidiaries of OMNOVA Solutions Inc.(1)



The following is a list of the subsidiaries of OMNOVA
Solutions Inc., an Ohio corporation (the Corporation). The common stock OMNOVA Wallcovering (USA), Inc., OMNOVA Wallcovering (UK) Limited, OMNOVA Performance Chemicals (UK) Ltd. and Muraspec N.A. LLC is wholly owned, directly or
indirectly, by the Corporation. CPPCDecorative Products Company Limited and CGOMNOVA Decorative Products (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. are unconsolidated joint ventures in which the Corporation has a 50.1% ownership interest.



|                                                  |  |                                        
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Name of Corporation                               |  | State of Incorporation                 
|OMNOVA Wallcovering (USA), Inc.                   |  | Ohio                                   
|OMNOVA Wallcovering (UK), Limited                 |  | United Kingdom limited company         
|OMNOVA Performance Chemicals (UK) Ltd.            |  | United Kingdom limited company         
|Muraspec N.A. LLC                                 |  | Delaware limited liability company     
|CPPCDecorative Products Company Limited          |  | Thailand limited company               
|CGOMNOVA Decorative Products (Shanghai) Co., Ltd |  | Chinese wholly foreign owned enterprise

---

|(1) |  | The Corporation also controls, directly or indirectly, fifteen other companies that, in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary, as such term is
defined in Rule 1-02 (w) of Regulation S-X.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

EXHIBIT 27.1

                               HEALTHEXTRAS, INC.
                            FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999


This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheets and Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss of
HealthExtras, Inc.as of and for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                     46,971,106
<SECURITIES>                                  664,984
<RECEIVABLES>                                  62,795
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           51,459,383
<PP&E>                                      1,994,736
<DEPRECIATION>                               (89,889)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             53,662,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       6,297,987
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      276,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 47,088,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               53,662,083
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            5,326,527
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              16,422,905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               73,234
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (11,520,009)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (11,520,009)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                             (11,520,009)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.56)



</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1859 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Agency 

Contributions and Related Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Agency Contributions and Related Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 SENATE, AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS AND RE5 LATED EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:40 Apr 13, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1859.IH H1859

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1859 IH

1 able for Senate, Agency Contributions and Related Ex2 penses for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $59,912,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1568 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1568

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
   To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to protect personally identifiable 
                  information, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Moving Americans Privacy Protection 
Act''.
SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION.
    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 431(c) of the Tariff Act 
of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1431(c)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(2)(A) The information listed in paragraph (1) shall not be 
available for public disclosure if--
        ``(i) the Secretary of the Treasury makes an affirmative 
    finding on a shipment-by-shipment basis that disclosure is likely 
    to pose a threat of personal injury or property damage; or
        ``(ii) the information is exempt under the provisions of 
    section 552(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code.
    ``(B) The Secretary shall ensure that any personally identifiable 
information, including Social Security numbers and passport numbers, is 
removed from any manifest signed, produced, delivered, or 
electronically transmitted under this section before access to the 
manifest is provided to the public.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 30 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```