alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Sarah B. Corrie v. Daniel T. Corrie.

*Divorce*— Conflicting *evidence.*

A decree of divorce may be affirmed even though the evidence on which it was granted is so conflicting that different tribunals might come to opposite conclusions.

Appeal from Wayne.

Submitted June 8.

Decided June 15.

Bill for divorce. Defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

*John W. McGrath*for complainant.

*236
      *James W. Romeyn*for defendant.

Graves, J.

The circuit judge passed on the evidence in this cause and reached the conclusion that complainant’s application for divorce was fully sustained. ¥e have carefully examined the testimony and find it very conflicting, and no doubt different tribunals on looking at it as it appears on paper might come to opposite determinations. And such might be the case after rejecting the depositions of Mrs. Oorrie. It would be a waste of time to write out a discussion of the facts. The view we take is that the bias of the evidence is not such as to justify overruling the court of original jurisdiction.

The decree is affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
             OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Benton H Wilcoxon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this
Amended Quarterly Report of Composite Technology Corporation on Form 10-Q/A for
the period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Composite
Technology Corporation.


Date: May 31, 2006


By: /s/ Benton H Wilcoxon
Benton H Wilcoxon
Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1755 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1755

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
            relations treatment) to products of Uzbekistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2023

 Mr. Kelly of Mississippi (for himself, Mrs. Miller of West Virginia, 
Mr. Bacon, and Mr. Vicente Gonzalez of Texas) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
            relations treatment) to products of Uzbekistan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Uzbekistan Normalized Trade Act''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 
              TO PRODUCTS OF UZBEKISTAN.

    (a) Presidential Determinations and Extension of Nondiscriminatory 
Treatment.--Notwithstanding any provision of title IV of the Trade Act 
of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may--
            (1) determine that such title should no longer apply to 
        Uzbekistan; and
            (2) after making a determination under paragraph (1) with 
        respect to Uzbekistan, proclaim the extension of 
        nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations treatment) 
        to the products of Uzbekistan.
    (b) Termination of Applicability of Title IV.--On and after the 
date on which the President extends nondiscriminatory treatment to the 
products of Uzbekistan pursuant to subsection (a), title IV of the 
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.) shall cease to apply to 
Uzbekistan.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on the date on 
which the President certifies to Congress that Uzbekistan has acceded 
to the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization 
and is a Member of the World Trade Organization.
                                 <all>
```
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-10-00474-CR

____________________

LEWIS BOOKMAN JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 258th District Court 

Polk County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 20671 

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

A jury convicted Lewis Bookman Jr. of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.

The trial court sentenced him to seventeen years in prison. Bookman’s appellate counsel 

filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional evaluation of the record. Counsel 

concludes there are no arguable points of error. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 

87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1978). This Court granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se response. We 

received no response from him. We have reviewed the appellate record and agree with 

counsel’s conclusion. It is unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief 
2

the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The 

trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

________________________________

 DAVID GAULTNEY

 Justice

Submitted on December 27, 2012

Opinion Delivered January 23, 2013

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

METROPOLITAN GLASS 

COMPANY, INC. and QBE 

INSURANCE CORPORATION,

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

vs. ) CA 14-0418-CG-C

)

NATIONAL TRUST INSURANCE 

COMPANY, FCCI INSURANCE 

COMPANY, and FCCI INSURANCE 

GROUP,

)

)

)

)

)

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been 

no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated December 17, 2014, is ADOPTED as the opinion of 

this Court. Counts V and VI of plaintiffs’ complaint are due to be and hereby are 

DISMISSED. In addition, plaintiffs’ are ORDERED to amend their complaint to 

take out Counts V and VI and, as well, eliminate all unnecessary references to 

punitive damages on or before January 12, 2015. The defendants’ answer to the 

amended complaint shall be filed no later than January 26, 2015.

DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of January, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00418-CG-C Document 23 Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of WorldQuest Networks, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, B. Michael Adler, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company. By:/s/ B. Michael Adler
     Name: B. Michael Adler
     Title: President and Chief Executive Officer April 30, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CORNELIUS SMITH, et al., )

 )

Plaintiffs, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION 14-0107-WS-B

 )

WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC., )

 )

Defendant. )

ORDER 

The defendant and eleven plaintiffs have filed a joint motion for approval 

of settlement agreement. (Doc. 143). “When employees bring a private action for 

back wages under the FLSA, and present to the district court a proposed 

settlement, the district court may enter a stipulated judgment after scrutinizing the 

settlement for fairness.” Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 

1353 (11th Cir. 1982). “[T]he rule of Lynn’s Food Stores applies to settlements 

between former employees and employers” just as it does to agreements by current 

employees. Nall v. Mal-Motels, Inc., 723 F.3d 1304, 1307 (11th Cir. 2013). 

The Court is unusually familiar with this case, as it has entered numerous 

rulings on the substantive motions presented by the parties, and the Court has no 

difficulty in concluding that the settlement is fair and reasonable. The Court also 

determines that the releases and confidentiality provisions satisfy the standards 

articulated by the Court in Crabtree v. Volkert, Inc., 2013 WL 593500 (S.D. Ala. 

2013). 

For the reasons set forth above, the joint motion for approval of settlement 

agreement is granted. The parties are ordered to submit, on or before

Case 1:14-cv-00107-WS-B Document 145 Filed 09/03/15 Page 1 of 2
2

September 17, 2015, a proposed stipulated judgment in accordance with 

governing law.

DONE and ORDERED this 3rd day of September, 2015.

s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00107-WS-B Document 145 Filed 09/03/15 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

BULOVA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I John D Stanton, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John D. StantonJohn D. StantonPrincipal Executive Officer
June 25, 2010
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Filiberto Aller, Appellant.

[970 NYS2d 460]

— Appeal by the de*552fendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Braun, J.), imposed March 8, 2012, upon his convictions of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree (two counts), sexual abuse in the first degree (four counts), robbery in the third degree, and unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, the resentence being periods of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate terms of imprisonment previously imposed by the same court (Katz, J.), on March 24, 2004, upon the convictions of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, and sexual abuse in the first degree.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Inasmuch as the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally imposed sentences of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily required periods of postrelease supervision did not violate the Double Jeopardy and Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution *(see People v Lingle,*16 NY3d 621, 630-632 [2011]; *People v Pemberton,*93 AD3d 681 [2012]; *People v Mills,*90 AD3d 1076 [2011]; *People v Louis,*90 AD3d 1075 [2011]; *People v Algarin,*89 AD3d 859 [2011]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Eng, EJ., Rivera, Leventhal and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 12a0924n.06

No. 11-6537

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

RAMONA POWELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CHEROKEE INSURANCE CO.,

Defendant-Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

Before: BOGGS, GILMAN, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam. Plaintiff-Appellant Ramona Powell alleges that Cherokee Insurance Company

(“Cherokee”) violated Kentucky’s Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act (“UCSPA”) in its

processing of her third-party insurance claim. The district court granted summary judgment in favor

of Cherokee on the ground that Powell failed to present evidence that Cherokee had engaged in

outrageous or egregious behavior, notwithstanding the undisputed delay in resolving her claim.

After the district court rendered its decision and the parties had fully briefed the issues in the

instant appeal, we decided Phelps v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 680 F.3d

725 (6th Cir. 2012), a case that considered similar claims of an insurer’s bad faith arising under the

UCSPA. Because Phelps may be instructive in the resolution of the issues presented in the instant

case, we hereby VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for reconsideration in

light of our analysis in Phelps.
Exhibit 10.14


 


SHAREHOLDERS REPAYMENT
PLAN


 


The shareholders Quan Ji and Qimei Li hereby
make the following repayment plan in relation to their loans from Anhui Renrenjia Solar Energy Co., Ltd.


 


	Shareholder’s
    name	Total
    amount of the loan (as of  30/09/2014)	Repayment by 31/05/2015

        (40% of the total)
	Repayment by 30/06/2015

        (60% of the total)

	Quan
    Ji 	¥39,848,541.03	¥15,939,416.41	¥23,909,124.62
	 	 	 	 
	Qimei  Li	¥39,571,286.17	¥15,828,514.47	¥23,742,771.7


 


This statement is hereby made.


 


	Signatures:	Mr. Quan Ji	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Quan Ji	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Mrs. Qimei Li	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Qimei Li	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	ANHUI
    RENRENJIA SOLAR ENERGY CO. LTD  	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	(official
    seal)	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	/s/
    ANHUI     RENRENJIA SOLAR ENERGY CO. LTD 
 (corporate chop)	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	01/12/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

THOMAS C. WELLER, JR., )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 08-00240-CG-C

)

VAN P. FINGER, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This matter is before the court on defendant’s Rule 58(e) Motion for Order that Pending

Request for Attorneys’ Fees Have Same Effect as Rule 59 Motion Upon Time for Appeal (Doc.

183) and defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration of Order Releasing Funds. Etc. (Doc. 182).

Having considered the motions and the premises therefore, they are GRANTED, to the

extent that the court’s previous Order (Doc. 181) releasing the funds deposited with the court is

AMENDED to permit the release of only $100,000.00 of those funds, with accrued interest, to

plaintiff. The other $300,000.00 is to be retained in an interest bearing account pending

resolution of any appeal. 

In addition, the court ORDERS that pursuant to Rule 58(e), F. R. Civ. P., the pending

request for attorneys’ fees shall have the same effect, under F.R.A.P. 4(a)(4), as a timely motion

under Rule 59, F. R. Civ. P.

DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of April, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-00240-CG-C Document 186 Filed 04/05/10 Page 1 of 1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1954 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health 

and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration 

Health Workforce, Construction and Capital Improvement Costs for Fiscal Year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration Health Workforce, 

Construction and Capital Improvement Costs for Fiscal 

Year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1954 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV3 ICES, HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES 

4 ADMINISTRATION HEALTH WORKFORCE, 

5 CONSTRUCTION AND CAPITAL IMPROVE6 MENT COSTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Department of Health and Human Services, 

10 Health Resources and Services Administration Health 

11 Workforce, Construction and Capital Improvement Costs 

12 for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $1,096,695,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50906

Conference Calendar

 

BENNIE FINISTER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THON WILEY NICHOLS, Guard of

Texas Department of Criminal

Justice; ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-95-CV-345

- - - - - - - - - - -

April 8, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The motion filed by Bennie Finister, Texas state prisoner

#649506, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is

DENIED. Finister has failed to identify a nonfrivolous issue for

appeal. The district court did not err in certifying that an

appeal would be frivolous. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED

as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983); Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.24 (5th Cir. 1997); 
O R D E R

No. 96-50906

- 2 -

5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Finister that any additional

frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the

imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Finister is further

cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do

not raise arguments that are frivolous.

IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING

ISSUED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DEMARIO WALKER, #L1625, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0501-CG-C

MOBILE COUNTY CLERKS, :

Defendant. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this

Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

DONE and ORDERED this 23rd day of April, 2010. 

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00501-CG-C Document 17 Filed 04/23/10 Page 1 of 1
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77473-77474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30048]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-622-000]

Ridgetop Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Ridgetop Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application 
includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is January 6, 2015.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.

[[Page 77474]]

    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email [email protected]. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 17, 2014.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30048 Filed 12-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    I, Donna L. Dubinsky, certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the
fiscal year ended June 28, 2003 fully complies with the requirements in Sections
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Handspring, Inc. for the
periods being presented.

                                             /s/ DONNA L. DUBINSKY
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                                   Donna L. Dubinsky
                                                Chief Executive Officer


Date: September 26, 2003