alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2004 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health 

and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Substance Abuse Prevention for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health and Human Services, Substance 

Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Substance Abuse Prevention for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2004 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV3 ICES, SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL 

4 HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION SUB5 STANCE ABUSE PREVENTION FOR FISCAL 

6 YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Department of Health and Human Services, Sub10 stance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 

11 Substance Abuse Prevention for fiscal year 2024 may not 

12 exceed $205,469,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1952 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1952

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
        Labor, Office of Inspector General for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
        Labor, Office of Inspector General for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 
              OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Labor, 
Office of Inspector General for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 
$87,487,000.
                                 <all>
```
---

EXHIBIT 32.1




Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of U.S. Neurosurgical, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan Gold, President and Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Neurosurgical, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of U.S. Neurosurgical, Inc.


/s/ Alan GoldAlan GoldPresident & Chairman of the BoardMarch 30, 2011
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of American Oriental Bioengineering, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yanchun Li, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By: /s/  Yanchun Li
    ------------------------------------
    YANCHUN LI
    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

DATED: MAY 6, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
       (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                              UNITED STATES CODE)


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Internet
Initiative Japan Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended
March 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 6, 2007


                                INTERNET INITIATIVE JAPAN INC.

                                      /s/ Koichi Suzuki
                               -------------------------------------------------
                                Name:     Koichi Suzuki
                                Title:    President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Representative Director
! " #$%&'

#(+,-,,-+,	+$,$#	,

.


//////////"//////////

#

"0
















$"
(1

#(1


*2 0
1


!
 "0

2 0
1

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

#30 .


 .

.
4 
 !"" .
  
#$

%&'
 .

003"0
03"
)"
 
*
"


.."

" )"
5 
*6)

*7

0


)6.
#

"

$00""3 " #$

%88 9."

" .09: .
3*6"
0
"
.#;%4


.
"

""
.#$%&''&9.

<
..
6
33*)*
9

IT IS ORDERED..
0"1

-(+- ;	(,-.


="3
 "*603"
"


03"0
(as reflected in 

the last judgment issued)  0."is reduced to 

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

-<
3".
7"
3
9**3"".
> 0

 ".**
0



IT IS SO ORDERED



1

Judge’s signature

-


1

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

 Southern District of Alabama

JODY SILVIO 08-00327-003

10558-003

9-30-2010

Pro Se

✔

✔

78 63 months

9-30-2010

3-11-2015

11-1-2015 United States District Judge

Callie V.S. Granade 

U.S. District Judge

Digitally signed by Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District 

Judge 

DN: cn=Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge, o=U.S. 

Government, ou=Federal Judiciary, 

email=efile_granade@alsd.uscourts.gov, c=US 

Date: 2015.03.11 08:38:33 -06'00'

Case 1:08-cr-00327-CG-B Document 985 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrico Ferriante COTTEN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-7199.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 17, 2001.

Decided May 22, 2001.

Enrico Femante Cotten, pro se. Jane J. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

*148PER CURIAM.

Enrico Femante Cotten appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court.*
      *United States v. Cotten,*Nos. CR-95-161-F; CA-00-167-5-F (E.D.N.C. June 30, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

We recently held in *United States v. Sanders,*247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.2001), that the new rule announced in *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. Accordingly, Cotten's *Apprendi*claim is not cognizable.
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MATERIALISE NV (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, as filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wilfried Vancraen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:



|(i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2015



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Wilfried Vancraen  
|    |  | Wilfried Vancraen      
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended November 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kevin M. McMullenKevin M. McMullenChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President/s/ Michael E. HicksMichael E. HicksSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: March 25, 2008

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.3
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Name:
    
    /s/ Maria R. Scheker

Maria R. SchekerTitle:
    
    Chief Accounting OfficerDate:
    
    May 14, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor
Trust II  Series F (Series FB), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Fs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series F.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer  
|Kenneth A. Shewer      
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 30, 2005
#### Hector NAVA MORA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-75625.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 12, 2006.*

Decided June 16, 2006.

Hector Nava Mora, North Hollywood, CA, pro se.

*623CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Marion E. Guy-ton, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KLEINFELD, PAEZ and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable *623for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Hector Nava Mora, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily affirming an immigration judge’s order denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s finding of statutory ineligibility due to lack of a qualifying relative. *See Molina-Estrada v. INS,*293 F.3d 1089, 1093-94 (9th Cir.2002). We review de novo claims of constitutional violations. *See Torres-Aguilar v. INS,*246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Nava Mora lacks a qualifying relative for purposes of cancellation of removal. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(d).

Nava Mora’s equal protection challenge to the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (“NACARA”) is foreclosed by *Jimenez-Angeles v. Ashcroft,*291 F.3d 594, 602-03 (9th Cir.2002). Nava Mora’s contention that the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 is unconstitutional because it holds applicants from certain countries to a higher standard than applicants who fall under the purview of NA-CARA is also foreclosed. *See id.*(“Congress’s decision to afford more favorable treatment to certain aliens ‘stems from a rational diplomatic decision to encourage such aliens to remain in the United States.’ ”).

Nava Mora’s contention that the BIA’s streamlined decision was conclusory and failed to offer a reasoned explanation is foreclosed by *Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 850 (9th Cir.2003).

Nava Mora’s remaining contentions are without merit.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

10:00 a.m., Friday, December 19, 2014.

# PLACE:

Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street  NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        Surveillance, enforcement, and examinations matters. In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at                         *http://www.cftc.gov.*

      ( print page 73887)    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-5964.

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick,  

Secretary of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014-29335 Filed 12-10-14; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Exhibit 10.3

 



 

June 9, 2015

 

UPDATED OFFER LETTER

 

Chen Schor

94 Arch Street

Needham, MA 02492

 

Dear Chen:

 

This letter updates the terms of your employment with Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp. (hereinafter “Synta Pharmaceuticals” or the “Company”) as previously set forth in your original offer letter dated December 3, 2014 (“Original Offer Letter”) and confirms the changes in your compensation approved by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors on June 5, 2015.  This letter refers to your appointment to the position of President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors, reporting to Keith Gollust, Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors.

 

1.              Effective Date:  The effective date of your new position is May 7, 2015.

 

2.              Compensation:  Effective June 16, 2016, your base salary will be $510,000.00 annually, payable at a semi-monthly rate of $21,250.00, from which all applicable taxes and other customary employment-related deductions will be taken.

 

3.              Bonus:  You will be eligible to receive an annual, discretionary performance-based cash bonus with the target amount of such bonus equal to sixty percent (60%) of your base salary salary at the end of the year to which the bonus relates, provided that the actual amount of the annual bonus may be greater or less than such target amount.  Such bonus, if any, will be granted at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and will be paid to you by no later than March 15th of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which it was earned.

 

4.              Equity:  You also received options to purchase common stock and restricted stock that are evidenced by separate agreements.

 

5.              Board Membership:  You shall serve as a member of the Board while you are employed as the President and Chief Executive Officer, subject to any required approval.  You shall resign from the Board effective immediately upon the termination of your employment with the Company for any reason.

 











 

All other terms and conditions set forth in the Original Offer Letter shall remain in full force and effect.

 

	
Sincerely,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
SYNTA PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
s/ Keith Gollust
    	
 
    
	
Keith Gollust
    	
 
    
	
Chairman of the Board
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Agreed to and accepted:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
s/ Chen Schor
    	
 
    	
Date:
    	
6/9/15
    
	
 
    	
Chen Schor
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JERMESHIA M. DALE, :

 :

Plaintiff, :

 :

vs. :

 : CIVIL ACTION 14-0227-M

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, :

Social Security Commissioner, :

 :

Defendant. :

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order entered this date, it is 

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT be entered in favor 

of Plaintiff Jermeshia M. Dale and against Defendant Carolyn W. 

Colvin.

DONE this 6th day of January, 2015.

s/BERT W. MILLING, JR. 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00227-M Document 22 Filed 01/06/15 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

April 24, 2019

No. 17-2548

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

BERNARD GREENSPAN,

 Appellant

(D.N.J. No. 2-16-cr-00114-001)

Present: HARDIMAN, KRAUSE, and BIBAS, Circuit Judges

1. Letter Motion by Appellee USA to Amend the Opinion dated April 17, 2019

2. Letter Response by Appellant to Letter Motion to Amend the Opinion

 dated April 17, 2019

Respectfully,

Clerk/ARR/dwb

_________________________________ORDER________________________________

Appellee’s motion to amend the opinion dated April 17, 2019, is granted in part. The 

opinion shall be amended in minor respects on pp. 3, 8, 10, 13, 18, 25, 29-30, and 37. These 

amendments do not alter the Court’s disposition or judgment as previously entered. So the 

date for entry of judgment will not be altered. The Clerk is directed to enter the amended 

opinion on the Court’s docket.

By the Court,

s/Stephanos Bibas

Circuit Judge

Dated: May 1, 2019

ARR/cc: MEC; JFR; SGS; PG
12173.

#### Walker *v.*The State.

Decided April 13, 1921.

Accusation of violation of liquor law; from city court of Dublin — Judge Sturgis. January 15, 1921.

*W. A. Dampier, Charles 8. ■Loclen,*for plaintiff in error.

*William Brunson, solicitor,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

1. When any apparatus for the manufacturing of whisky is found upon a person’s premises, that fact in itself is prima facie evidence that the person in actual possession of the premises had knowledge that the apparatus was upon the premises. Ga. L. Ex. Sess. 1917, p. 18. Under this ruling it was not error for the court In the instant case to refuse to charge the jury as follows: “Before you would be authorized in convicting the defendant in this case, if you find there was a still or apparatus for manufacturing whisky on the premises of the defendant, Will Walker, you would have to find further that he permitted the same to be located or placed there, or that he had knowledge of it being there on his premises, and permitted it to remain there; and you would have to believe this beyond a reasonable doubt.”

2. The remaining grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, not having been referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

3 .Erom the evidence and the defendant’s statement, the jury were authorized to find that he was in possession of the house where the apparatus for manufacturing whisky was found, and to return a verdict of guilty.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*