alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerome S. Flum, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







By: /s/
Jerome S. FlumJerome S. FlumChief Executive Officer





August 10, 2010




This certification is being furnished to the SEC with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section.
Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT TO "APPENDIX A" OF THE


ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.


SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN












THIS AMENDMENT to "Appendix A" of the Astec Industries, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2008 (the "Plan"), is adopted by Astec Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), effective as of July 23, 2015.







WHEREAS, Article 2 of the Plan permits the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board") to designate participants in the Plan from time to time, whose names and effective dates of participation shall be set forth on Exhibit A to the Plan;







NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends "Appendix A" of the Plan in the form attached hereto, to update the same for changes in Plan participation approved by the Board, by action taken on July 23, 2015.







Except as amended herein, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.







ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.







Date: July 23, 2015                                                                      By /s/ Steven C.Anderson


Name Steven C. Anderson


Title Secretary


 


 


 








 


"APPENDIX A"


Each Participant's Date of Participation







	
Name of Participant

	 	
Effective Dates of Participation


	
W. Norman Smith

	 	
January 1, 1995


	
Richard Patek

	 	
January 1, 1995


	
Jeff Elliott

	 	
January 1, 2002


	
Tim Gonigam

	 	
August 1, 2000


	
Jeff Richmond

	 	
May 1, 2004


	
Richard Dorris

	 	
January 3, 2005


	
Ben Brock

	 	
January 1, 2007


	
Michael A. Bremmer

	 	
January 1, 2007


	
Stephen C. Anderson

	 	
January 1, 2003


	
Lawrence R. Cumming

	 	
January 1, 2008


	
Neil Peterson

	 	
January 1, 2008


	
David C. Silvious

	 	
July 1, 2005


	
Joe Cline

	 	
February 1, 2008


	
Chris Colwell

	 	
May 31, 2011


	
Robin Leffew

	 	
August 1, 2011


	
D. Aaron Harmon

	 	
November 1, 2011


	
Matthew B. Haven

	 	
January 1, 2013


	
Jeff May

	 	
October 1, 2013


	
Malcolm Swanson

	 	
January 1, 2014


	
Tom Wilkey

	 	
January 1, 2014


	
Jeff Schwarz

	 	
July 1, 2014


	
Steve Claude

	 	
August 24, 2015
Exhibit 99.1

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public  Company  Accounting  Reform and  Investor
Protection  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted),  Paul O.  Koether,  the
Chairman and President of Kent Financial  Services,  Inc., (the "Company"),  and
John W. Galuchie, Jr., the Executive Vice President and Treasurer of the Company
each hereby certifies that, to the best of their knowledge:

     1.   The  Company's  Quarterly  Report on  Form 10-QSB for the period ended
          June 30, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1
          (the  "Periodic  Report"), fully complies  with  the  requirements  of
          Section 13(a) or  Section  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of
          1934, as amended;

         and

     2.   The information  contained in  the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial  condition  of the Company at the
          end of the period  covered  by  the  Periodic Report  and  results  of
          operations  of  the  Company  for  the  period covered by the Periodic
          Report.


Dated:   August 14, 2002


/s/ Paul O. Koether
---------------------------
Paul O. Koether
Chairman and President



/s/ John W. Galuchie, Jr.
---------------------------
John W. Galuchie, Jr.
Executive Vice President and Treasurer
Proclamation 9221 of December 15, 2014

# 70th Anniversary of the Battle of the Bulge

By the winter of 1944, the United States and Allied forces had stormed the beaches of Normandy, thundered into Europe, and liberated Paris, turning the tide in the struggle against the forces of oppression. With the fate of freedom in peril, millions of Americans went to fight for people they had never met to defend ideals they could not live without. But as Americans and our allies advanced through the Ardennes Forest region of Belgium and Luxembourg, German forces launched a desperate and massive assault, attacking the poorly-supplied and heavily-outnumbered Allied front during the early hours of December 16, 1944. Against improbable odds, patriots of exceptional valor and remarkable courage beat back Hitler's armies and achieved a crucial victory at the Battle of the Bulge, marking the beginning of the end of a world war.

The Battle of the Bulge was one of the United States largest and bloodiest encounters of the Second World War. Over the course of more than a month, some 500,000 American service members fought through snow and bitter winter conditions. In extraordinarily difficult circumstances, our Armed Forces faced down bullets and German tanks. From the grip of hatred and tyranny, they won a victory for liberty and freedom. But our triumph came at a tremendous cost; over 76,000 Americans were killed, wounded, or missing in action.

On the 70th anniversary of the Battle of the Bulge, we are called to do more than commemorate a victory. We must honor the sacrifice of a generation who defied every danger to free a continent from fascism. As we salute the unfailing dedication of a free people, we tell their story so as to commit it to the memory of our Nation. The world will never forget the heroes who stepped forward to secure peace and prosperity far from home, and we will always remember those who gave their last full measure of devotion.

The warriors who defended the promise of liberty during the Battle of the Bulge are an inspiring and heroic link in an unbroken chain that has made America the greatest force for freedom the world has ever known. Today, we lift up their memories and carry forward the proud legacy of the veterans who gave their all and in doing so, changed the course of human history.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim Tuesday, December 16, 2014, as the 70th Anniversary of the Battle of the Bulge. I encourage all Americans to observe this solemn day of remembrance with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fifteenth day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand fourteen, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-ninth.



[FR Doc. 2014-29822 Billing code 3295-F5
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Paige, Appellant.

[973 NYS2d 80]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (A. Kirke Bartley, J.), rendered on or about July 1, 2010, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Concur— Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Andrias and DeGrasse, JJ.
Exhibit32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuantto18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant toSection 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jonathan Stern, ChiefFinancial Officer of Register.com, Inc. (the"Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(i) TheCompany's accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December  31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(ii) The information contained in such report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

|        |  |                                       |  |  |  |  |
|--------|--|---------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
|   |  | /s/Jonathan Stern                     |
|   |  | Jonathan Stern ChiefFinancial Officer |
|        |

Dated: May 3,2005

----
----

|   | (6) | the      Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (7) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Tony Liu                                                      Name: Tony      LiuTitle: Chief      Executive OfficerMarch      15, 2010 /s/      Yanchun Li                                                  Name: Yanchun      LiTitle: Chief      Financial OfficerMarch      15, 2010 |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

----
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.s 333-56576, 333-64246, 333-32666, 333-103622, 333-116449, 333-122708 and 333-126306) of our report dated July 7, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Selectica, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the two year period ended March 31, 2009.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Armanino McKenna LLP
|San Ramon, California   
|July 7, 2009
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,J. Kimo Esplin, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1on Form 10-K/A of Huntsman Corporation and Huntsman International LLC; and

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report.*

 

Date:April 29, 2008

 

 
|   | /s/  J. Kimo Esplin       |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | J.  Kimo Esplin           |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----

*******                **Paragraphs 3,4 and 5 of the form of certification are omitted because this Amendment No. 1on Form 10-K/A does not include the information as to which suchparagraphs relate.

 

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7819** 

LARRY KEITH GREEN, a/k/a Said Abdullah Hakim , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CARLTON B. JOYNER; TRESA BROWN TOMLINSON; BOBBY W. MARSHALL; G. BLACKMAN; H. CLAY; SERGEANT STRICKLAND; D. STANLEY; J. MARTIN, Governor; T. GULLEY; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COBB; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PRATT; B. TALLY; JOSEPH UMESI; CARMEN HENDRICKS; HOPE SMITH; D. STRICKLAND; JOHN ASLETT; M. REYNOLDS; P. DAVIS; W. LUNSFORD; THOMAS TART , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:11

- ct

- 03175

- BO )

Submitted : March 27, 2014 Decided: March 31, 2014

Before MOTZ , Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Larry Keith Green, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Larry Keith Green appeals the district court ’ s order s dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint without
prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (20 12 ) , and denying

his motion for reconsideration . W e have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Green v. North Carolina
Dep’t of Corr. , No. 5:11

- ct

- 03175

- BO (E.D.N.C. June 26 &

Oct. 29, 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before th is court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE   CONTAINES   SUMMARY   FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM
CONSOLIDATED  AUDITED  CONDENSED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FILED WITH THE COMPANY'S
NOVEMBER  30,  1997  QUARTERLY  REPORT ON FORM  10-QSB AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000316128
<NAME>                        FLEXWIGHT CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                U. S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          233,388
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       495,808
<OTHER-SE>                                    (729,196)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, * 

 Plaintiff, * 

vs. * CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-00155-CG-C 

GEORGE WASHINGTON, JR., * 

 Defendant. * 

JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT 

 An entry of default having been entered by the clerk of court as to defendant, George 

Washington, Jr., on June 15, 2010 (Doc. 9), all in accordance with Rule 55(a) of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure, and counsel for plaintiff having filed a motion for judgment by default 

against defendant and having filed a proper unsworn declaration (Doc. 10) as to the amount due; 

 It is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure, judgment is rendered in favor of plaintiff, United States of America, 

and against defendant, George Washington, Jr., in the amount of $14,453.63 (principal of 

$11,784.10, prejudgment interest at 3.28% per annum in the amount of $2,669.53 through March 

31, 2010); plus prejudgment interest from March 31, 2010, through the date of judgment; and 

post judgment interest at the legal rate of 0.33% pursuant to the provisions of Title 28, United 

States Code, Section 1961, until paid in full, and court costs. 

DONE and ORDERED this 17th day of June, 2010. 

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:10-cv-00155-CG-C Document 11 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 1
What is the Planck Constant? —

Quantum mechanics shows us that energy is exchanged in
specific amounts, Known as quanta. The Planck constant defines
how much energy is in those quanta.

One way to understand the Planck constant is with coffee and sugar.

Classical physics

If energy is the sugar you pour into coffee, it appears as if you can pour any
amount, large or small. This is the familiar world of classical physics, at the
scale of coffee cups and people and cars.

Quantum physics

But if you look at the sugar closely, you see that it’s made up of
individual crystals. Each quantum (the singular of quanta) is like a
single sugar crystal. You can’t add anything smaller than it to the
coffee. And the Planck constant determines the size of the crystal.

Why is the Planck constant important?

The Planck constant provides the foundation of quantum physics and continues to bring about
revolutionary breakthroughs in technology. It has played a central role in:

eeoen

Designing the Making possible Generating Bringing about Enabling Defining the
computer chips the lasers and LEDs electricity from GPS, which photodetectors kilogram, the
in smartphones, used in everything sunlight in solar depends on used in smoke international
tablets, laptops from television cells atomic clocks to detectors and unit of mass
and desktops displays to pinpoint your garage doors

lightbulbs location on Earth

So what is the value of the Planck constant?
The short answer Is that it’s a very small value. We can express It two ways:

6.62607015 « 10" Joule seconds 4.1356679 « 10 eV seconds

104 is a tiny number, equal to: 10° is a slightly larger number, equal to:
0.0000000000000000000000000000000001 0.000000000000001

The two values are equivalent. It’s kind of like how you can state the
temperature in both degrees Fahrenheit and Celsius.

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF
STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY www.nist.gov/education
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER LEE PRICE, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CA 14-0472-KD-C

WILLIAM G. SHARP, JR., ACTING :

COMMISSIONER,ALABAMA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, in :

his official capacity, et al.,

:

Defendants.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo

determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the 

recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated 

February 24, 2015, is ADOPTED, in part, as follows, as the opinion of this Court.

The Court adopts Part A, B, and D. However, as to Part C and the conclusion, 

when Magistrate Judge Cassady issued his thorough report and recommendation he 

did not have the benefit of Gissendaner v. Commissioner, Georgia Dept. of Corrections, - - -

F. 3d - - -, 2015 WL 859534 (11th Cir. March 2, 2015).

1

 The Court will withhold ruling 

 1 In Gissendaner, the Eleventh Circuit explained as follows: “To succeed in an Eighth 

Amendment challenge to a lethal injection protocol, a prisoner must establish an 

objectively intolerable risk of harm that prevents prison officials from pleading that 

they were subjectively blameless for purposes of the Eighth Amendment. That requires 

the prisoner to show two things: (1) the lethal injection protocol in question creates a 

substantial risk of serious harm, and (2) there are known and available alternatives that 

are feasible, readily implemented, and that will in fact significantly reduce [the] 

substantial risk of severe pain. ” 2015 WL 859534, at *6 (internal quotation marks 

Case 1:14-cv-00472-KD-C Document 18 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 2
2

for thirty (30) days on the current motion to dismiss (based on failure to state a claim), 

to allow the Plaintiff to file a motion to amend the complaint. The motion should 

include a proposed amended complaint with sufficient facts addressing the second

prong of Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. 35, 50–52, 128 S. Ct. 1520, 1531–32, 170 L.Ed.2d 420 (2008) 

(plurality opinion)(Plaintiff must show that there are “known and available

alternatives” that are “feasible, readily implemented, and in fact significantly reduce a

substantial risk of severe pain.”)

If an amended complaint is allowed, the previously filed motion to dismiss based 

on failure to state a claim will be determined to be moot. 

DONE this 23rd day of March 2015.

s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

omitted) (quoting Chavez v. Fla. SP Warden, 742 F.3d 1267, 1272 (11th Cir. 2014) (quoting 

Baze, 553 U.S. at 50, 128 S.Ct. at 1531 (plurality opinion)).

Case 1:14-cv-00472-KD-C Document 18 Filed 03/23/15 Page 2 of 2