alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.14



 Exhibit 10.14 

WELLSPRING DISTRIBUTION CORP. 

NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION 
 Date:
December 11, 2008 
 Grant to: George Holm (the “Participant”) 

the right to purchase from Wellspring Distribution Corp. (the “Company”): 

1,389,909.40 shares of its Non-Voting Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, at a price of $5.49 per share. 

The foregoing options are “Options” as such term is defined in the Company’s Amended and Restated 2007 Management Option Plan
(the “Plan”), and are subject to all of the terms and conditions of the Plan in effect from time to time. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings as in the Plan. 

In consideration for the grant of Options under this agreement, Participant hereby agrees that: 

(1) The Options shall not be entitled to any protections or benefits under any change in control protection agreement between
Participant and PFG (or its affiliates) entered into prior to the Amendment Effective Date (including each agreement for Key Executives of PFG) (in each case as modified, amended or supplemented from time to time, a “CIC
Agreement”)). The terms of the Options are governed solely by the Plan and this agreement. 
 (2) The Participant
shall not to be entitled to any benefits or protections under any CIC Agreement arising out of any corporate change in control transactions occurring after the date of this agreement and, in furtherance of the foregoing, all CIC Agreements shall
expire and cease to be of further force and effect on May 24, 2010. 
 To the extent Participant currently enjoys certain benefits or
protections pursuant to any such CIC Agreement, this agreement does not change, reduce, or alter any such benefits or protections to which Participant is entitled in respect of the change in control transaction that occurred on May 24, 2008
(except as otherwise expressly provided in clause (1) above with respect to Options granted under this agreement). 
 The Participant
expressly acknowledges and agrees to be bound by and subject to the restrictive covenants in Article IX of the Plan. 
 This agreement may
be executed in one or more counterparts (including by means of telecopied signature pages), all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, acting by and through its duly authorized officers, has caused
this agreement to be executed as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	WELLSPRING DISTRIBUTION CORP.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jane Manion

	Name:	 	Jane Manion
	Its:	 	Chief Human Resource Officer


  

	
	Accepted and Agreed:
	
	 /s/ George Holm

	Name: George Holm
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cherokee International Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended
December 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Jeffrey M. Frank, as President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of the Company,
and Linster W. Fox, as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|/s/JEFFREY M. FRANK |  |                                                                                                             
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name:               |  | Jeffrey M. Frank                                                                                            
|Title:              |  | President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)                              
|Date:               |  | March 28, 2008                                                                                              
|/s/LINSTER W. FOX   |  |                                                                                                             
|Name:               |  | Linster W. Fox                                                                                              
|Title:              |  | Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|Date:               |  | March 28, 2008                                                                                              

---



QuickLinks
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

THOMAS CURTIS HINES, #118977 :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 11-0644-WS-C

KIM THOMAS, et al., :

Defendants. :

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be and is hereby 

DISMISSED with prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) as the claims either fail to state a claim upon which relief can be 

granted or are frivolous. 

DONE this 25th day of August, 2016.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00644-WS-C Document 60 Filed 08/25/16 Page 1 of 1
#### M. Ellis, et al., *v.*Mary Baker.

Real Estate — Title Bond of Married Woman.

While a title bond executed only by a married woman is not en-forcible, when she receives the purchase price and purchases other property with it, a court of equity will not permit her tq retain both the purchase money and the property sold on such bond.

APPEAL FROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT.

October 21, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

There is no doubt but what Mrs. Ellis, upon the payment of the money for which her lot was sold, was entitled to the rights of Sutton, the purchaser, all of which appears from, the orders made in the case. The question then arises as to how Barker obtained the title. This lot had been sold and purchased by Sutton to satisfy a debt due by Mrs. Ellis to McDonald. Mrs. Ellis, in order to save the lot, sold it to Baker, or if sold prior thereto, received the money, a part of which satisfied the McDonald debt, and although the record shows that the money was paid by Mrs. Ellis, it was really paid by Baker, who held the bond of Ellis and wife for title. Swope was the attorney for all the parties in connection with the payment of this money, and it being paid by Baker, the attorney under the authority of Mrs. Ellis and Barker had the order made directing the deed to be made to Baker, so Baker was in fact substituted as purchaser, he paying the purchase money; and not only so, but he paid the entire consid*176eration for the lot, and with the money, Ellis and wife, after paying the McDonald debt, purchased another house and lot which they now occupy.

*Ray & Walker, for appellants.*

*Sweeney & Stuart, for appellee.*

The bond of a *feme covert*for title cannot, it is true, be enforced ; but when she receives the money and purchases other real estate, the chancellor will not favor her so much as to give her the land she sold and permit her to retain what she purchased. There is no equity in this case for the appellant. Baker relieved the property purchased by Sutton from the McDonald debt, and was substituted to the rights of both Mrs. Ellis and Sutton by reason of this payment. The order made for the deed at a time when the case was off the docket was made by the demands of the parties, and if not, Baker is entitled to a deed. The appellant must do equity before asking it.

Judgment *affirmed.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JEFFIE P. PARISH, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0494-CG-M

)

B & C GREENHOUSES, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

This cause is before the court on the Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 38), in 

which the plaintiff moves for dismissal with prejudice of his claims against Star 

Truck Rentals, Inc., and the plaintiff represents that the request is made without 

objection. Therefore, plaintiff’s claims against Star Truck Rentals, Inc. are hereby 

DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to bear his or its own costs, 

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE and ORDERED this 17th day of July, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00494-CG-M Document 39 Filed 07/17/15 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOTITLE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Enzo Biochem, Inc., and
Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |                                                                                                                                                           
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |                                                                                                                                                           
| | (2) The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
 the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                          |     |                                                             
|------------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: December
 10, 2009 | By: | /s/ Elazar
 Rabbani, Ph.D.                                  
|                          |     |                                                             
|                          |     | Elazar Rabbani,
 Ph.D.                                      
|                          |     | Chairman of the
 Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director

---
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 245 (Monday, December 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76408-76409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29938]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


National Council on Federal Labor-Management Relations Meeting

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Council on Federal Labor-Management Relations 
plans to meet on Wednesday, January 21, 2015.
    The meeting will start at 10:00 a.m. EST and will be held at the 
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 25 Louisiana Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20001. Interested parties should consult the Council Web 
site at www.lmrcouncil.gov for the latest information on Council 
activities, including changes in meeting dates.

[[Page 76409]]

    The Council is an advisory body composed of representatives of 
Federal employee organizations, Federal management organizations, and 
senior Government officials. The Council was established by Executive 
Order 13522, entitled, ``Creating Labor-Management Forums to Improve 
Delivery of Government Services,'' which was signed by the President on 
December 9, 2009. Along with its other responsibilities, the Council 
assists in the implementation of Labor Management Forums throughout the 
Government and makes recommendations to the President on innovative 
ways to improve delivery of services and products to the public while 
cutting costs and advancing employee interests. The Council is co-
chaired by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management and the 
Deputy Director for Management of the Office of Management and Budget.
    At its meetings, the Council will continue its work in promoting 
cooperative and productive relationships between labor and management 
in the executive branch, by carrying out the responsibilities and 
functions listed in Section 1(b) of the Executive Order. The meetings 
are open to the public. Please contact the Office of Personnel 
Management at the address shown below if you wish to present material 
to the Council at the meeting. The manner and time prescribed for 
presentations may be limited, depending upon the number of parties that 
express interest in presenting information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Curry, Deputy Associate Director 
for Partnership and Labor Relations, Office of Personnel Management, 
1900 E Street NW., Room 7H28, Washington, DC 20415. Phone (202) 606-
2930 or email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#67372b352708170a49000811"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dd8d918f9db2adb0f3bab2ab">[email protected]</span></a>.

    For the National Council.
Katherine Archuleta,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2014-29938 Filed 12-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
11958.

#### McClendon *v.*McClendon.

The evidence not being briefed as required by law, and no question being presented that can be determined without reference to the evidence, the judgment of the court below must be affirmed.

Decided March 9, 1921.

Action for money had and received; from Newton superior court — Judge Hutcheson. October 1, 1920.

*Branch & Howard, Bond Almand,*for plaintiff in error.

*G. C. King,*contra.

Luke, J.

Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court, by which this court is bound, this court will not review the evidence in a case when the evidence has not .been briefed as required by law. In the instant case there was no attempt to brief the evidence at all, the evidence sent to this court in the transcript of the record being apparently the evidence in full, with questions and answers, interspersed with objections by counsel and rulings of the court. In other words, there is no brief of evidence. Therefore, as no question is presented which can be determined without reference to the evidence, the judgment of the court below must be affirmed. See *Baker*v. Nix, 150 *Ga.*679 (104 S. E. 625). *McComb*v. *Hines,*123 *Ga.*246 (51 S. E. 300).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 76999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29959]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL15-31-000]


PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on December 15, 2014, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 
pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824e, and 
Part 35 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR part 35, submits tariff filing per 385.206: 
Revisions to the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement and Open 
Access Transmission Tariff re Offer Caps to be effective 1/9/2015.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables subscribers to 
receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed 
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a4c4f584945646663646f597f7a7a65787e4a6c6f7869246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96d0d3c4d5d9f8fafff8f3c5e3e6e6f9e4e2d6f0f3e4f5b8f1f9e0">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on December 23, 2014.

    Dated: December 15, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29959 Filed 12-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.4


 


Hydrogen Supply Agreement


 


Party A: Shenma Industrial Co.,
Ltd. (“Shenma”)


 


Party B: Henan Province Pingdingshan
Hongli Coal & Coke Co., Ltd. (“Hongli”)


 


As Hongli has established
the project to extract 12,000 cubic meters of syngas per hour from coke (Yu Pingshiji Make [2014] 06316), which will enable Hongli
to provide syngas by September 2015, and Henan Shenma Nylon Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. has a great demand of hydrogen in its production
process, the two parties reached a supply agreement and the terms are as follows:


 


		1.	Amount: 12,000 cubic meters per hour



		2.	Quality: in excess of 99.95% purity to meet the production needs of Party A



		3.	Price: fluctuates in line with market conditions



		4.	Transportation: Party B will deliver to Party A and cover the shipping cost



		5.	Measurement and quality inspection will be determined by Party A



		6.	Settlement will be done once a month



 


The two parties will negotiate to solve
other unwritten matters.


 


Entry date: 10/16/2014
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(2)

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
         (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Doral Financial Corporation, a Puerto Rico corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated : May 7, 2004


                                           By: /s/ Ricardo Melendez
                                               ---------------------------------
                                           Name: Ricardo Melendez
                                           Title: Executive Vice President
                                                  and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that Section.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to, and will be retained by, the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XVIII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB  for
the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XVIII, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XVIII,  Inc.,  each  certify, pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XVIII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 8, 2007



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XVIII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 8, 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CARL ARTHUR PERRY, :

AIS 105161,

:

Petitioner,

vs. : CA 05-0710-WS-C

WARDEN RALPH HOOKS, :

Respondent. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to

the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to

which objection is made, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated February 23, 2006, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this

Court.

DONE this 7th day of March, 2006.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00710-WS-C Document 15 Filed 03/07/06 Page 1 of 1