alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS,
               CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND
               NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
               AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
               FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                    AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                                22,290
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         30,118
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                          288,996
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     363,118
<PP&E>                                               208,389
<DEPRECIATION>                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       619,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                386,863
<BONDS>                                              120,123
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   6
<OTHER-SE>                                           132,603
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         619,272
<SALES>                                              842,151
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     842,151
<CGS>                                                573,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        573,141
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     245,536
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    14,832
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (1,778)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           1,897
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (3,675)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (3,675)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (3,675.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (3,675.34)


</TABLE>
Opinion issued January 17 , 201 3

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 12
- 0 1097
- C V

——————————— IN R E MELISSA GIESEN , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Melissa Giesen, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this
C ourt. See T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE § 22.221 (Vernon 2004) ; see also T EX
. R. A PP . P. 52

. 1. The related action pending in the trial is a suit to modify the parent

- child2

relationship. * In her mandamus petition, Giesen requests this Court to order respondents to vacate the “Temporary Orders in Suit to Modify Parent

- Child Relationship” signed on July 20, 2012.
W e deny Giesen ’ s petition for writ mandamus

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of C hief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown

.

* The underlying case is In the Interest of [N.T.S., T.L.S. and W.W.S.], Children , cause number 2010

– 78935 , pending in the 245 th District Court of Harris County, Tex as . Giesen identifies the Honorable Roy Moore, presiding judge of the 245th District Court, and the Honorable Annette Kuntz, who acted as a visiting judge in the trial court, as responde nts.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7750

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SIXTO MARCELINO GARCIA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-98-87, CA-01-332-5-BO) Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 11, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sixto Marcelino Garcia, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Sixto Marcelino Garcia seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Garcia , Nos. CR-98-87; CA-01- 332-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
SUBROUTINE SKIPR(NLHEAD)
C
C     PURPOSE--THIS SUBROUTINE READS THROUGH (SKIPS OVER)
C              NLHEAD LINES FROM INPUT UNIT = 5.
C              IF HEADER INFORMATION EXISTS AT THE
C              BEGINNING OF A DATA FILE, THIS SUBROUTINE
C              IS CONVENIENT FOR READING THROUGH
C              (SKIPPING OVER) THAT HEADER INFORMATION.
C     INPUT  ARGUMENTS--NLHEAD = THE INTEGER NUMBER OF CARD 
C                                IMAGES TO BE READ THROUGH
C                                (SKIPPED OVER).
C     OUTPUT--NONE. 
C     PRINTING--NO. 
C     RESTRICTIONS--NLHEAD IS A NON-NEGATIVE INTEGER VARIABLE.
C     OTHER DATAPAC   SUBROUTINES NEEDED--NONE.
C     FORTRAN LIBRARY SUBROUTINES NEEDED--NONE.
C     MODE OF INTERNAL OPERATIONS--INTEGER.
C     LANGUAGE--ANSI FORTRAN. 
C     REFERENCES--NONE.
C     WRITTEN BY--JAMES J. FILLIBEN
C                 STATISTICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY (205.03)
C                 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
C                 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20234
C                 PHONE--301-921-2315
C     ORIGINAL VERSION--SEPTEMBER 1975. 
C     UPDATED         --NOVEMBER  1975. 
C     UPDATED         --MAY       1976. 
C     UPDATED         --OCTOBER   1976. 
C
C---------------------------------------------------------------------
C
      IRD=5
      IPR=6
C
C     CHECK THE INPUT ARGUMENTS FOR ERRORS
C
      IF(NLHEAD.LT.0)GOTO55
      GOTO90
   55 WRITE(IPR,8)
      WRITE(IPR,47)NLHEAD
      RETURN
   90 CONTINUE
    8 FORMAT(1H , 87H***** FATAL ERROR--THE FIRST  INPUT ARGUMENT TO THE
     1 SKIPR  SUBROUTINE IS NEGATIVE *****)
   47 FORMAT(1H , 35H***** THE VALUE OF THE ARGUMENT IS ,I8   ,6H *****)
C
C-----START POINT-----------------------------------------------------
C
C     SKIP OVER THE HEADER LABEL
C
      IF(NLHEAD.EQ.0)RETURN
      DO100I=1,NLHEAD
      READ(IRD,105)IA
  105 FORMAT(A1)
  100 CONTINUE
C
      RETURN
      END
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

N os. 04

- 18

- 00458

- CR, 04

- 18

- 00459

- CR & 04

- 18

- 00460

- CR

Victor RIGGAN
, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the County Court at Law, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court Nos. CR171326, CR171327 & CR 171328 Honorable Susan Harris, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION
, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgments of the trial court are AFFIRMED.

SIGNED April 10, 2019.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
#### Oliver Waddle *v.*Commonwealth.

Criminal Law — Instructions—Exceptions.

In a criminal case where no exceptions are made to instructions given at the instance of the commonwealth, objections are waived and will not be considered by the court of appeals.

Sufficiency of Indictment.

The court of appeals has no power to reverse a criminal cause on account of the trial court’s error in overruling a demurrer to an indictment.

APPEAL PROM BUTLER CIRCUIT COURT.

January 13, 1876.

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

The instructions given at the instance of the commonwealth were not excepted to by the defendant; and this court has so repeatedly held that unless exceptions are taken to the giving of instructions in criminal trials, they are waived, that we do not now feel at liberty to hold that exceptions are unnecessary.

This construction of the Criminal Code was adopted as early as i860 in the case of *Clem v. Commonwealth,*3 Met. 10, and in *Burns v. Commonwealth,*Ib. 13, and has been repeatedly recognized and acted upon since that time, and the matter has thus been placed beyond the power of this court. If the ends of justice demand a change in the practice in this regard, the legislature alone is competent to make it. The indictment seems to us to be sufficient even on demurrer, but whether so or not we have no power to reverse for error in overruling a demurrer to an indictment. Sec. 334, Crim. Code.

*578
      *B. L. D. Guffy, A. Duvall, for appellant.*

*T. E. Moss, for appellee.*

The court did not err in refusing to arrest the judgment. The indictment stated facts constituting a public offense within the jurisdiction of the Butler circuit court, and under section 271 the judgment could not be properly *arrested. It was not*necessary to *describe*the manner in which or to indicate in the indictment at what part of the house the alleged breaking and entry were .made.

The defendant did not object to the jury being allowed to *separate;*and if he had, this court would have no jurisdiction to consider the propriety of that action on the part of the circuit court.

The variance between the name given on the indictment and judgment and that in the verdict was not material, and especially is this true in view of the fact that in one of his own instructions the defendant called himself by the same name by which he is called in the verdict.

We perceive no error available on the record for a reversal of the judgment, and it must therefore be *affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 177 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 177

    To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to ensure nursing 
 facilities report information on medical directors of such facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

 Mr. Levin (for himself and Mr. Fitzpatrick) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and 
  in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to ensure nursing 
 facilities report information on medical directors of such facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENSURING NURSING FACILITIES REPORT INFORMATION ON MEDICAL 
              DIRECTORS OF SUCH FACILITIES.

    Section 1124(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a-3(c)) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the following 
        new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Updated regulations.--Not later than 2 years 
                after the date of the enactment of this subparagraph, 
                the Secretary shall revise the regulations promulgated 
                pursuant to subparagraph (A) to require, effective on 
                the date that is 90 days after the date on which such 
                revised regulations are published in the Federal 
                Register, a facility to include in reports required 
                under this section the information described in 
                paragraph (2)(A)(ii)(II) with respect to managing 
                employees who are medical directors of such facility. 
                Beginning 6 months after such revised regulations are 
                so published, the Secretary shall make such information 
                so reported with respect to medical directors of a 
                facility publicly available on the Nursing Home Compare 
                website under section 1819(i) (or a successor 
                website).''; and
            (2) in paragraph (5)(C), by inserting ``and shall include a 
        medical director of such facility'' before the period at the 
        end.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32





Certification


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of


the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Oriental Bioengineering, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigned officer’s knowledge:





i.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





ii.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Tony Liu


Tony Liu


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


March 15, 2011








/s/ Yanchun Li


Yanchun Li


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)


March 15, 2011
##### 



Doral Financial Corporation
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
 For the nine month period endedSeptember 30, 2006Including Interest on DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax income from continuing operations
    
    $
    (90,559
    )Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    487,563Total Earnings
    
    $
    397,004Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    483,849Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized
expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    1,354An estimate of the interest component within rental expense
    
    
    2,360Total Fixed Charges before preferred dividends
    
    
    487,563Preferred dividend factor
    
    
    24,974Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    512,537Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
    
    
    (A
    )Excluding Interest on DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax income from continuing operations
    
    $
    (90,559
    )Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    376,223Total Earnings
    
    $
    285,664Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    372,509Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized
expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    1,354An estimate of the interest component within rental expense
    
    
    2,360Total Fixed Charges before preferred dividends
    
    
    376,223Preferred dividend factor
    
    
    24,974Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    401,197Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
    
    
    (A
    )
 
 (A)
    
    Due to the Companys pre-tax loss for the first nine
months of 2006, the ratio coverage was less than 1:1. The Company
would have had to generate pre-tax income of at least
$25.0 million to achieve a ratio of 1:1 for the nine month
period ended September 30, 2006.
UNITED STATES
                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

                           FORM 10-Q

            QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
              OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


           For the Quarter ended December 31, 1997

              Commission file number     33-24537


            CENTURY PACIFIC TAX CREDIT HOUSING FUND II
      (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


          CALIFORNIA                       95-4178283
(State of other jurisdiction of            (IRS Employer
incorporation of organization)             Identification Number)


1925 Century Park East, Suite 1760
Los Angeles, CA                            90067
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code:
(800) 262-8242


No Change
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year if changed
since last report)


Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.


Yes  [x]          No  [ ]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alberto CAMPOS-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 99-50697.

D.C. No. CR-99-00037-DOC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2001.*

Decided May 29, 2001.

Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Alberto Campos-Chavez appeals his 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for unlawful reentry by a previously deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Campos-Chavez contends that in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court improperly imposed a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) because the government neither stated in the indictment, nor established through the guilty plea, that he had been deported following a prior conviction for an aggravated felony. *545Compos-Chavez also contends that *Apprendi*renders inapplicable *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a sentencing factor and not a separate offense).

Campos-Chavez’ arguments are foreclosed by *United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda,*234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), *amended*(Feb. 8, 2001), *cert. denied,*— U.S. —, 121 S.Ct. 1503, 149 L.Ed.2d 388 (2001).

AFFIRMED.1

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Appellant’s March 22, 2001 motion to withdraw the previously file motion to withdraw and brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*is GRANTED. So granted, Appellant’s substitute opening brief and supplemental excerpt of record received on March 22, 2001 is ordered filed.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1887 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of Representatives, Salaries and Expenses of the Office of the Whistleblower Ombudsman for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House 

of Representatives, Salaries and Expenses of the Office 

of the Whistleblower Ombudsman for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SALARIES 

5 AND EXPENSES OF THE OFFICE OF THE 

6 WHISTLEBLOWER OMBUDSMAN FOR FISCAL 

7 YEAR 2024. 

8 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

9 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:45 Apr 14, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1887.IH H1887

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1887 IH

1 able for House of Representatives, Salaries and Expenses 

2 of the Office of the Whistleblower Ombudsman for fiscal 

3 year 2024 may not exceed $0.00. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 181 

To promote accountability and transparency in future executive orders. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. MANN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To promote accountability and transparency in future 

executive orders. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NOTIFICATION RESPECTING CERTAIN EXECU4 TIVE ORDERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days before 

6 issuing a qualifying executive order, the President shall 

7 transmit to the Congress, and make publicly available, a 

8 notification with respect to such executive order. Such no9 tification shall contain— 

10 (1) the text of the executive order; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 181 IH

1 (2) the Federal law or laws affected by the ex2 ecutive order that is the subject of the notification; 

3 (3) how the President is working within the pa4 rameters specified in Federal law and the Constitu5 tion; 

6 (4) the means by which the executive order will 

7 be accomplished, including through any related Fed8 eral agencies or departments; and 

9 (5) a comprehensive list of organizations, busi10 nesses, and other parties or entities the President, 

11 or the President’s designee, engaged with prior to 

12 the issuance of such executive order. 

13 (b) REPORTS.—Not later than 6 months after the 

14 date of the enactment of this Act, and every 12 months 

15 thereafter, the President shall submit to the Congress a 

16 report on the outcome of each qualifying executive order 

17 issued during the period covered by the report. 

18 (c) QUALIFYING EXECUTIVE ORDER.—The term 

19 ‘‘qualifying executive order’’ means any executive order 

20 (including an executive order that revokes or nullifies a 

21 previous executive order) issued on or after the date of 

22 the enactment of this Act, relating to abortion, including 

23 the prohibition on the use of Federal funds for abortions, 

24 as specified in sections 506 and 507 of division H of the 

25 Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (Public Law 116– 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 181 IH

1 260) (commonly referred to as the ‘‘Hyde amendment’’), 

2 and the right to life guaranteed by the 14th Amendment 

3 to the Constitution. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS