78036 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 248 / Monday, December 29, 2014 / Notices 

7See also 19 CFR 351.210(b)(2) and (e); see also 

Letter from Oman Fasteners to the Department, 

regarding ‘‘Request to Postpone Final 

Determination’’ (December 11, 2014); see also Letter 

from Petitioner to the Department, regarding 

‘‘Extension Request of Final Determination’’ 

(December 10, 2014). 

8 Id. 

9See Modification of Regulations Regarding the 

Practice of Accepting Bonds During the Provisional 

Measures Period in Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Investigations, 76 FR 61042 

(October 3, 2011). 

1See Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven 

Selvedge From the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012, 79 FR 36013 (June 25, 

2014) (Preliminary Results). 

months. Additionally, Oman Fasteners 

requested to extend the application of 

the provisional measures prescribed 

under section 733(d) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.210(e)(2), from a four-month 

period to a six-month period. Pursuant 

to a request from Oman Fasteners and 

in accordance with section 735(a)(2)(A) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(2)(ii) 

and (e)(2), we will make our final 

determination no later than 135 days 

after the date of publication of this 

preliminary determination.7 The 

suspension of liquidation described 

above will be extended accordingly.8

Suspension of Liquidation 

In accordance with section 733(d)(2) 

of the Act, we are directing U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

to suspend liquidation of all entries of 

nails from Oman as described in the 

scope of the investigation section 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.205(d), we 

will instruct CBP to require a cash 

deposit equal to the weighted-average 

amount by which the NV exceeds EP, as 

indicated in the chart above.9 These 

suspension of liquidation instructions 

will remain in effect until further notice. 

International Trade Commission 

(‘‘ITC’’) Notification 

In accordance with section 733(f) of 

the Act, we have notified the ITC of our 

preliminary affirmative determination of 

sales at LTFV. Because the preliminary 

determination in this proceeding is 

affirmative, section 735(b)(2) of the Act 

requires that the ITC make its final 

determination as to whether the 

domestic industry in the United States 

is materially injured, or threatened with 

material injury, by reason of imports of 

certain steel nails from Oman before the 

later of 120 days after the date of this 

preliminary determination or 45 days 

after our final determination. Because 

we are postponing the deadline for our 

final determination to 135 days from the 

date of publication of this preliminary 

determination, as discussed above, the 

ITC will make its final determination no 

later than 45 days after our final 

determination. 

This determination is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.205(c). 

Dated: December 17, 2014. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Period of Investigation 

IV. Postponement of Preliminary 

Determination 

V. Postponement of Final Determination and 

Extension of Provisional Measures 

VI. Scope of the Investigation 

VII. Scope Comments 

VIII. Respondent Selection 

IX. Discussion of Methodology 

A. Fair Value Comparisons 

1. Determination of Comparison Method 

2. Results of the Differential Pricing 

Analysis 

X. Product Comparisons 

XI. Date of Sale 

XII. Affiliation 

XIII. Export Price 

XIV. Normal Value 

A. Comparison-Market Viability 

B. Calculation of Normal Value Based on 

CV 

XV. Currency Conversion 

XVI. U.S, International Trade Commission 

Notification 

XVII. Disclosure and Public Comment 

XVIII. Verification 

XIX. Conclusion 

[FR Doc. 2014–30433 Filed 12–24–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–953] 

Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven 

Selvedge From the People’s Republic 

of China: Final Results of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2012 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

countervailing duty order on narrow 

woven ribbons with woven selvedge 

(ribbons) from the People’s Republic of 

China (PRC). The period of review 

(POR) is January 1, 2012, through 

December 31, 2012. We find that 

Yangzhou Bestpak Gifts & Crafts Co., 

Ltd. (Bestpak) received countervailable 

subsidies during the POR. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 29, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dana Mermelstein or Joshua Morris, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office I, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–1391 or (202) 482–1779. 

Case History 

No party submitted comments on the 

Preliminary Results, which were 

published by the Department on June 

25, 2014.1 The events that have 

occurred since we published the 

Preliminary Results are discussed in the 

Memorandum to Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, ‘‘Decision Memorandum 

for Final Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review: Narrow Woven 

Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from the 

People’s Republic of China’’ (Decision 

Memorandum), dated December 22, 

2014, which is hereby adopted by this 

notice. A list of the topics included in 

the Decision Memorandum is attached 

as an Appendix to this notice. 

The Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via the Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and in the 

Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the 

main Department building. In addition, 

a complete version of the Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html/. 

The signed Decision Memorandum and 

the electronic versions of the Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Scope of the Order 

The scope of the order consists of 

ribbons. The merchandise subject to this 

order is classifiable under the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) statistical 

categories 5806.32.1020; 5806.32.1030; 

5806.32.1050 and 5806.32.1060. Subject 

merchandise also may enter under 

subheadings 5806.31.00; 5806.32.20; 

5806.39.20; 5806.39.30; 5808.90.00; 

5810.91.00; 5810.99.90; 5903.90.10; 

5903.90.25; 5907.00.60; and 5907.00.80 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 248 / Monday, December 29, 2014 / Notices 78037 

2See sections 771(5)(B)and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

3See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. 

4 19 CFR 351.224(b) calls for the Department to 

disclose calculations performed in connection with 

the final results of an administrative review within 

five days after the publication of the final results. 

1See Drill Pipe from the People’s Republic of 

China: Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 11757 

(March 3, 2011); Drill Pipe from the People’s 

Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 76 

FR 11758 (March 3, 2011); Drill Pipe and Drill 

Collars from China, Investigation Nos. 701–TA–474 

and 731–TA–1176 (Final), USITC Publication 4213 

(February 2011). 

and under statistical categories 

5806.32.1080; 5810.92.9080; 

5903.90.3090; and 6307.90.9889. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description, 

available in Narrow Woven Ribbons 

with Woven Selvedge from the People’s 

Republic of China: Countervailing Duty 

Order, 75 FR 53642 (September 1, 2010), 

remains dispositive. 

A full description of the scope of the 

order is contained in the Decision 

Memorandum. 

Methodology 

We conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). For each of the subsidy programs 

found countervailable, we have 

determined that there is a subsidy, i.e., 

a government-provided financial 

contribution by an ‘‘authority’’ that 

gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, 

and that the subsidy is specific.2

In making these findings, we relied on 

facts available and, because Bestpak and 

the Government of the PRC did not act 

to the best of their ability to respond to 

our requests for information, we have 

drawn adverse inferences in selecting 

from among the facts otherwise 

available.3 For further information, see 

‘‘Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

Adverse Inferences’’ in the Decision 

Memorandum. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Decision 

Memorandum. 

Changes from the Preliminary Results 

No party submitted comments with 

respect to the Preliminary Results. 

Because we have identified more 

appropriate information for use as 

adverse facts available, we have revised 

the net subsidy rate for Bestpak 

accordingly. For a full description of 

that updated information and 

accompanying changes, see the Decision 

Memorandum. 

Final Results of the Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4)(i), we calculated an 

individual subsidy rate for Bestpak for 

the period January 1, 2012, through 

December 31, 2012. 

We find that the net subsidy rate for 

Bestpak is as follows: 

Producer/exporter 

Net subsidy 

rate 

% 

Yangzhou Bestpak Gifts & 

Crafts Co., Ltd ................... 88.49 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

All calculations for these final results 

are contained in the Decision 

Memorandum and have been thereby 

disclosed.4

Assessment Rates 

Consistent with section 751(a)(1) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), upon 

issuance of the final results, we shall 

determine, and the U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

countervailing duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review. We 

intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 

days after publication of these final 

results of this review in the Federal 

Register. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

We intend to instruct CBP to collect 

cash deposits of countervailing duties in 

the amount shown above for Bestpak. 

For all non-reviewed firms, we will 

instruct CBP to continue to collect cash 

deposits of estimated countervailing 

duties at the most recent companyspecific or all-others rate applicable to 

the company. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

This administrative review and notice 

are in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213. 

Dated: December 19, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

Adverse Inferences 

A. Application of AFA to Bestpak 

B. Subsidy Rate Chart 

V. Disclosure 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2014–30390 Filed 12–24–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–965; C–570–966] 

Drill Pipe From the People’s Republic 

of China: Notice of Court Decision Not 

in Harmony With International Trade 

Commission’s Injury Determination, 

Revocation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Orders Pursuant 

to Court Decision, and Discontinuation 

of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On November 10, 2014, the 

Court of International Trade (CIT) 

entered its final judgment sustaining the 

International Trade Commission’s (ITC) 

remand redetermination that imports of 

drill pipe from the People’s Republic of 

China (PRC) do not materially injure or 

threaten to materially injure the United 

States domestic industry. As a result, we 

are notifying the public that this court 

decision is not in harmony with the 

ITC’s original affirmative determination 

that the domestic industry was 

threatened with material injury by 

reason of imports of drill pipe from the 

PRC, and pursuant to the ITC’s 

publication of its negative remand 

redetermination in the Federal Register, 

we are hereby revoking these orders. 

DATES: Effective Date: November 20, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia 

Hancock or Kristen Johnson, AD/CVD 

Operations, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

Telephone: (202) 482–1394 or (202) 

482–4793, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 3, 2011, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) published 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

orders on imports of drill pipe from the 

PRC, based, in part, on the final 

affirmative determination of the ITC that 

the domestic industry was threatened 

with material injury by reason of 

imports of drill pipe from the PRC.1


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES