alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 74815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29545]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Performance Review Board Members: Correction

AGENCY: Corporate Senior Executive Management Office, Department of 
Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) published a notice, 
``Performance Review Board Members,'' in the Federal Register on 
December 12, 2014, that contained an error. Specifically, it 
incorrectly stated that Pat Vandenberg would serve on the VA 
Performance Review Board. This notice corrects that error and announces 
the appointment of Elias Hernandez to the Board.

DATES: Effective date: December 12, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Corporate Senior Executive Management Office, Department of 
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Tia N. Butler, Executive 
Director, Corporate Senior Executive Management Office (052), 
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20420, (202) 461-7865. (This is not a toll free number.)

Correction

    In the Federal Register of December 12, 2014, in FR Doc.14x-29262, 
on page 73952, correct the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION by adding the name 
``Elias Hernandez'' and removing the name ``Patricia C. Vandenberg''.

Signing Authority

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this 
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document 
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as 
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jose D. 
Riojas, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this 
document on December 12, 2014, for publication.

    Dated: December 12, 2014.
William F. Russo,
Acting Director, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of 
the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014-29545 Filed 12-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
ex10-1.htm


 

Exhibit 10.1

 

May 28, 2015

 

Mercantile Bank Corporation

Mercantile Bank of Michigan

310 Leonard St. NW

Grand Rapids, Michigan 49504

 

Re:  First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated November 13, 2014

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

This letter confirms our agreement reached today regarding the Employment Agreement dated as of November 13, 2014, by and among you and me (the "Employment Agreement"). We have agreed that all references in the Employment Agreement to my titles as President and Chief Executive Officer of Mercantile Bank Corporation (the "Company") or as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Mercantile Bank of Michigan (the "Bank"), are amended respectively to refer to Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Chairman of the Bank, to take into account my promotion to Chairman of the Company and my resignation as the Chief Executive Officer of the Bank. 

 

Any future changes to my titles for the Company or the Bank will be automatically incorporated into the Employment Agreement without the need for an amendment.

 

Except as specifically amended by this letter, all of the terms of the Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect. This letter may be executed in counterparts, and is governed by Michigan law.

 

	
 
	 	
/s/ Michael H. Price
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Michael H. Price
	
 



 

MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION

 

	
By: 
	
/s/ Robert B. Kaminski, Jr.
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Its: EVP – Chief Operating Officer
	
 

	 	

	 
	
MERCANTILE BANK OF MICHIGAN
	 
	 	
 
	 
	By:	/s/ Robert B. Kaminski, Jr.	 
	 	

	 
	 	
Its:
	President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
EXHIBIT 32 (b)

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Enzo  Biochem,  Inc.,  and
Subsidiaries  ("the Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2005
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Barry Weiner.,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

              (1)    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


              (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



         /s/  Barry Weiner




         Barry Weiner
         Chief Financial Officer
#### M. J. Brewer *v.*C. Mercke.

Married Women — Garnishee.

A married woman who is a member of a firm indebted to A but who is not empowered to bind herself as provided by the statute, cannot be required to answer as a garnishee at the suit of A’s creditors. Not being bound to A she cannot be required to answer to his creditors.

APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

January 21, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

It seems that T. G. Brewer & Co. were indebted to Moore by simple promissory note, in the sum of two hundred fifty dollars.

Mrs. M. J. Brewer was a member of the firm of T. G. Brewer & Co. Upon a rule to show cause why she should not be compelled, as a garnishee, to pay the amount of said note into- court, Thomas Brewer responded that at the time the alleged indebtedness to Moore was incurred, and at the time the note to him was executed, and ever since, she was and still continued to be a *feme covert,*and she pleaded and relied on her coverture.

The record shows that the cause was heard upon the sufficiency of this response. There is nothing before us from which it can be inferred that evidence of any kind was heard.

The court adjudged the response insufficient, and the rule against Mrs. Brewer has been made absolute, and an attachment awarded. This was error. Although Mrs. Brewer seems to have been the *323partner of her son, it does not appear that she had been empowered to bind herself by contracting as a *feme sole.*

*A. L. Pope, for appellant.*

*Green & Kohn, for appellee.*

Her contract with Moore was not enforceable, and the note held by him, so far as she is concerned, is a nullity. Her coverture would defeat a recovery by the holder of the note, and the creditors of Moore certainly can claim nothing from Mrs. Brewer that Moore himself could not compel her to pay. The order appealed from is reversed, and the cause remanded with'instructions to dismiss the proceedings as to Mrs. Brewer.
Q&A on the NIST 

Privacy Framework

November 29, 2018
• Background 

• Process

• Request for Information (RFI)

o Organizational Considerations

o Structure

o Practices

• Q&A

Today’s Webinar
• Long track record of 

successfully, collaboratively 

working with public and 

private sectors

• Experience developing the 

Cybersecurity Framework

• Extensive privacy expertise

Why NIST?
• Designing, operating, or using technologies in ways 

that are mindful of diverse privacy needs in an 

increasingly connected and complex environment

• Multiplying visions for how to address privacy 

challenges inside and outside the U.S.

• Good cybersecurity doesn’t solve it all

Why a privacy framework?
Collaborative 

Effort

What will the framework look like?
The Process to Date

ONGOING ENGAGEMENT

Open public comment and review encouraged 

and promoted throughout the process

Workshop #1

Austin, TX 

October 16, 2018

Request for 

Information

Open until Dec. 

31, 2018, 5 PM ET

Webinar

November 29, 

2018
Framework Outline 

Release

Anticipated early 2019

Outlining the Privacy 

Framework: Workshop #2 

Anticipated early 2019

Upcoming Opportunities to Engage
Organizational 

Considerations
NIST is proposing as a working assumption:

Organizations are challenged with bridging between policies 

or principles and implementation of effective privacy 

practices. NIST believes that organizations would be better 

able to address the full scope of privacy risk with more tools 

to support better implementation of privacy protections.

Agree? Disagree?

What need will the framework 

address?
Managing privacy risk, not just 

compliance risk

It’s a framework, not a 

prescription

Risk-Based Approach
Security and Privacy Risk Relationship

Security 

Risks

Privacy 

Risks

arise from 

unauthorized 

system 

behavior

Security 

of PII

arise as a 

byproduct of 

authorized PII 

processing

There is a clear recognition that 

security of PII plays an important 

role in the protection of privacy

Individual privacy cannot be 

achieved solely by securing PII

Authorized processing: system 

operations that handle PII 

(collection - disposal) to enable 

the system to achieve 

mission/business objectives 
NIST Working Model: System Privacy Risk

Privacy Risk Factors: 

Likelihood | Problematic Data Action | Impact
Support organizations’ 

obligations under different 

regimes 

Align with other frameworks or 

standards

Compatibility
Communication

Provide common language

Serve broad audience
Various sectors

Small and medium-sized 

business

Scalable
Able to be updated as 

technology and approaches 

to privacy protection 

change 

Living Document
Structure and 

Practices
Improving integration of 

privacy risk management 

process with product and 

service development 

processes

Usable
Practices that are widely used

Relevant standards or guidance

Implementation challenges

Specific Privacy Practices
Resources

Website

https://nist.gov/privacyframework

Mailing List

https://groups.google.com/a/list.nist.gov

/forum/#!forum/privacyframework

Contact Us

PrivacyFramework@nist.gov

@NISTcyber

#PrivacyFramework
Q&A
#### AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UCB FILMS PLC, Defendant-Appellee. UCB Films PLC, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, and UCB Sidex Limited, UCB SA, and David Ibbitson, Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, and Todd O’Reilly, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. Avery Dennison Corporation, Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant.

No. 01-1030, 01-1250.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: May 18, 2001.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of the joint motion to remand these appeals, due to settlement,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

> (1) The motion is granted.

> (2) A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to hear appeal no. 00-1549, which was a companion case to appeal no. 01-1030.

> *831(3) All sides shall bear their own costs.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**397 CAF 15-00371**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT BLASZAK, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
MELISSA BLASZAK, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

--------------------------------------- DAVID H. FRECH, ESQ., ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, APPELLANT.

DAVID H. FRECH, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, BUFFALO, APPELLANT PRO SE.
ELIZABETH CIAMBRONE, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
REBECCA J. TALMUD, WILLIAMSVILLE, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Kevin M. Carter, J.), entered November 10, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, set forth a schedule with respect to the parties’ access to the subject children.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on April 11, 2016,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: April 29, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1661 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise taxes 

on wagering. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2023 

Ms. TITUS (for herself, Mr. RESCHENTHALER, Mr. AMODEI, and Mr. 

HORSFORD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the excise taxes on wagering. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Discriminatory Gam5 ing Tax Repeal Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAXES ON WAGERING. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 35 of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986 (relating to taxes on wagering) is re9 pealed. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1661 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2022. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CONDITION AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE
STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED EARNINGS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 OF NALCO
CHEMICAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                     38,800,000
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                             238,300,000
<ALLOWANCES>                              (4,900,000)
<INVENTORY>                                90,800,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          385,200,000
<PP&E>                                  1,169,400,000
<DEPRECIATION>                          (647,400,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,394,500,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     289,700,000
<BONDS>                                   252,600,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                   400,000
<COMMON>                                   15,100,000
<OTHER-SE>                                639,000,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,394,500,000
<SALES>                                 1,303,500,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1,303,500,000
<CGS>                                     568,600,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             568,600,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         14,400,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           229,400,000
<INCOME-TAX>                               83,500,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       145,900,000
<DISCONTINUED>                              8,600,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                              154,500,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    2.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.97


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SABARNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Century Pacific Tax Credit Housing
Fund-II (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Irwin J. Deutch, Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership.

/s/ Irwin J. Deutch
---------------------------
Irwin J. Deutch
President, Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; R13 Conference Review.                    

*Date:*                         January 5, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         William C. Benzing, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NINDS/NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-0660,                         *benzingw@mail.nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: December 17, 2014.

Carolyn Baum, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-30006 Filed 12-22-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 10.34

FIRST AMENDMENT  TO  HUNTSMAN SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN

This First Amendment to the HUNTSMAN SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN (the "Plan") is entered into this 10 day of November 2006.

WHEREAS,
the parties desire to amend the Plan to reflect additional changes in the Plan required for compliance with the current interpretation of Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code and the transitional relief thereunder.

NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1.Effective January 1, 2005, Section 5.3 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:



2.The provisions of this First Amendment shall supercede the terms of the Plan to the extent those terms are inconsistent
with this First Amendment.

DATED
the day and year first above written.

| |  | HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL LLC
| |  | --------------------------
| |  | By:                       
| |  |                           

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Global Diversified Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Adam
Debard, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Adam
Debard


Adam
Debard


Principal
Accounting Officer




August
15, 2008
10749.

#### Buchannon *v.*Park, receiver, *et al.*

Decided September 17, 1920.

Motion to set aside judgment; from city court of Blakely — Judge Turnipseed. May 19, 1919.

*C. J. Taylor,*for plaintiff.

*Little, Powell, Smith & Goldstein,*contra.

Stephens, J.

1. A motion was made by the plaintiff to set aside a judgment rendered in his favor against the Bank of Blakely, and a rule nisi was issued requiring the Bank of Blakely, W. G. Park, receiver, D. W. James, president, and R. O. Waters, trustee in bankruptcy for D. W. James, to show cause why the judgment should not be set aside.' Service of the rule nisi was perfected on W. G. Park, receiver for the Bank of Blakely, and on W. W. Brunson; and answers *thereto*were filed only by W. G. Park, receiver, and R. O. Waters, trustee. Upon a hearing, it appearing that the receiver had been finally discharged, the petition was properly dismissed as to him, and it appearing that the original judgment sought to be set aside was against the Bank of Blakely only, the petition was properly dismissed as to R. O. Waters, trustee in bankruptcy for D. W. James, president.

2. Moreover, it not affirmatively appearing from the record that the motion, which was strictly statutory, was presented and filed in term time, it was properly dismissed. *Bedgood*v. *Floyd,*20 *Ga. App.*617 (93 S. E. 218).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J,, and Smith, J. concur.*
Exhibit 99.1

              Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                      of Title 18 of the United States Code

         I, Kevin K. Albert, the Chief Executive Officer of ML-Lee Acquisition
Fund II, L.P. (the "Registrant"), certify that (i) the Form 10-Q of the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii)
the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant
for the periods presented.


Dated:   August 14, 2002
      --------------------------------------

                                          By:      /s/      Kevin K. Albert
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                                            Kevin K. Albert
                                                President, ML Mezzanine II Inc.