alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1. | I      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Medis Technologies Ltd.      (the “Registrant”); and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/      Jose Mejia                                                               |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Jose      MejiaChairman      and Chief Executive OfficerApril      30, 2009  |   |

----
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Salim Ghafari, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global  Environmental
Energy Corp.

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  Quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly
report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this Quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly report.

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
exchange act rules 13a-14 and 15d- 14) for the registrant and have:

     A) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this Quarterly report is being prepared;
     B) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
Quarterly report (the "evaluation date"); and
     C)  presented  in  this  Quarterly   report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the evaluation date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     A) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     B) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.


Date:  January 25, 2005

By:/s/Salim Ghafari
-----------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BFC Financial
Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John K. Grelle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       |  | /s/ John K. Grelle     
|Name:  |  | John K. Grelle         
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:  |  | August 14, 2012
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HAROLD L. ARMSTRONG, Sr.,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

R. BARNES, Warden, High Desert State

Prison; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-16806

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-02037-LKKCKD

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence K. Karlton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 20, 2016** 

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Harold L. Armstrong, Sr., appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and

the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) alleging deliberate indifference to

FILED

JAN 27 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
his serious medical needs and disability discrimination. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447

(9th Cir. 2000) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Armstrong’s Eighth Amendment

deliberate indifference claim because Armstrong failed to allege facts sufficient to

show that any defendant disregarded an excessive risk to Armstrong’s health. See

Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1057-58 (9th Cir. 2004) (a prison official is

deliberately indifferent only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk

to an inmate’s health; neither a prisoner’s difference of opinion concerning the

course of treatment nor mere negligence in treating a medical condition amounts to

deliberate indifference).

The district court properly dismissed Armstrong’s claim that prison officials

violated the ADA because Armstrong failed to allege facts sufficient to show that

prison officials discriminated against him because of a disability. See Simmons v.

Navajo Cty., Ariz., 609 F.3d 1011, 1022 (9th Cir. 2010) (“The ADA prohibits

discrimination because of disability, not inadequate treatment for disability.”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Armstrong’s

requests for appointment of counsel because Armstrong failed to demonstrate

exceptional circumstances. See Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir.

2 13-16806
2009) (setting forth standard of review and “exceptional circumstances”

requirement).

AFFIRMED.

3 13-16806
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BRENT JACOBY (#291560) *

Plaintiff, *

 *

vs. * CIVIL ACTION:13-00070-KD-B

 *

SHERIFF HUEY MACK, et al. *

Defendants. *

 

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order issued on this date, it is 

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary 

Judgment is GRANTED, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice, and 

judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants and against 

Plaintiff Brent Jacoby.

DONE and ORDERED this the 21st day of March 2016.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00070-KD-B Document 76 Filed 03/22/16 Page 1 of 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John Okubo, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Bay View Capital Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date: May 10, 2004 /s/ John OkuboJohn OkuboExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1







                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1




                    FIDUCIARY CAPITAL PENSION PARTNERS, L.P.


                         STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET
                          INVESTMENT INCOME PER LIMITED
                                PARTNERSHIP UNIT
               FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2001 AND 2000


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                2001              2000
                                              ---------        ---------

<S>                                           <C>              <C>
Net Investment Loss                           $ (41,546)       $ (62,635)

Percentage Allocable to Limited Partners            100%             100%
                                              ---------        ---------

Net Investment Loss Allocable
   to Limited Partners                        $ (41,546)       $ (62,635)
                                              =========        =========

Weighted Average Number of Limited
   Partnership Units Outstanding                805,741          869,796
                                              =========        =========

Net Investment Loss Per Limited
   Partnership Unit                           $   (0.05)       $   (0.07)
                                              =========        =========
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1375
JEFF LARSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LIAM O’GRADY, Judge Federal Court; ANDREW, U. S. Customs; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria, James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-70-JCC) Submitted: June 9, 2005 Decided: June 14, 2005 Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeff Larson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jeff Larson appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), (iii) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Larson v. O’Grady , No. CA-05-70-JCC (E.D. Va. Feb. 9, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1

                                Exhibit No. 11.1



                        Statement of Computation of Net
                         Investment Income Per Limited
                                Partnership Unit


<PAGE>   2

                        FIDUCIARY CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.


                        STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET
                         INVESTMENT INCOME PER LIMITED
                                PARTNERSHIP UNIT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             For the Three Months         For the Six Months
                                                Ended June 30,              Ended June 30,
                                           ------------------------    ------------------------
                                              1997          1996          1997          1996
                                           ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------
<S>                                        <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>       
Net Investment Income                      $  195,129    $  335,406    $  378,164    $  634,603

Percentage Allocable to Limited Partners           99%           99%           99%           99%
                                           ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------

Net Investment Income Allocable
   to Limited Partners                     $  193,178    $  332,052    $  374,382    $  628,257
                                           ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========

Weighted Average Number of Limited
   Partnership Units Outstanding            1,299,176     1,407,244     1,299,176     1,407,244
                                           ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========

Net Investment Income Per Limited
   Partnership Unit                        $      .15    $      .24    $      .29    $      .45
                                           ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.12

 



 

March 13, 2015

 

Dr. Reinilde Heyrman

 

Subject:  Amendment to Employment Agreement

 

Dear Reinilde:

 

As we verbally discussed, this letter represents an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2012, between you and Ikaria, Inc. (“Ikaria”), which Employment Agreement was assumed by Bellerophon Therapeutics, Inc. (“Bellerophon”) in connection with Bellerophon’s spin-out from Ikaria in February 2014 (the “Employment Agreement”).

 

Section 3(c) of the Employment Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

“Annual Bonus.  For the 2012 calendar year and each subsequent calendar year during the Employment Period, the Employee shall be eligible to receive a bonus based on the Employee’s service during such year in such amount as is determined in accordance with the terms of the Company’s management incentive program then applicable to the Employee at an annualized target of 40% of Annual Base Salary, provided that the Employee is employed by the Company at the time such Annual Bonus is declared due and owing (the “Annual Bonus”).  Beginning with the Annual Bonus in respect of calendar year 2014 and for years thereafter, the Company, in its sole discretion, may pay such bonus in cash or a combination of cash and equity, in each instance on such terms as are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors; provided, however, that if the Annual Bonus is to be paid in a combination of cash and equity, such cash and equity components shall be in equal parts.  With respect to any equity awards granted to the Employee in respect of the calendar year 2014 Annual Bonus, if the Employee is terminated without Cause (as defined in the applicable award agreement) by the Company within the twelve (12) month period following the grant of such equity award, then the equity award shall vest in full as of the date of such termination of employment.”

 

All other terms of the Employment Agreement will remain the same.

 

The Employment Agreement, as supplemented and modified by this Amendment, constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the parties thereto with respect to the subject matter thereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings relating to such subject matter.

 

 

	
/s/ Jonathan M. Peacock
    	
 
    
	
Jonathan M. Peacock
    	
 
    
	
President and Chief Executive   Officer
    	
 
    


 

53 Frontage Road, Suite 301, Hampton, NJ 08827 | 908-574-4770 |  bellerophon.com

 











 

I acknowledge and accept the above amendment to my Employment Agreement as of the date first set forth above.

 

 

	
/s/ Reinilde Heyrman
    	
 
    
	
Reinilde Heyrman
    	
 
    
	
Chief Clinical Development   Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 8, 2022

No. 04-17-00310-CV

YATES ENERGY CORPORATION, EOG Resources, Inc., Jalapeno Corporation, ACG3 

Mineral Interests, Ltd., Glassell Non-Operated Interests, Ltd., and Curry Glassell,

Appellants

v.

BROADWAY NATIONAL BANK, Trustee of the Mary Frances Evers Trust,

Appellees

From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015PC2618

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

On December 6, 2021, we ordered the parties to file additional briefing in this appeal. 

Appellants’ additional reply briefs are currently due on March 8, 2022. On March 4, 2022, 

appellants EOG Resources, Inc., Yates Energy Corporation, Jalapeno Corporation, ACG3 

Mineral Interests, Ltd., Glassell Non-Operated Interests, Ltd., and Curry Glassell filed a joint 

unopposed motion requesting an extension of time to file their reply briefs until March 18, 2022. 

After consideration, we GRANT the motion and ORDER appellants to file their reply briefs by 

March 18, 2022.

It is so ORDERED March 8, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
<PAGE>   1
                                Exhibit No. 11.1


                         Statement of Computation of Net
                          Investment Income Per Limited
                                Partnership Unit

<PAGE>   2
                        FIDUCIARY CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.


                         STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET
                          INVESTMENT INCOME PER LIMITED
                                PARTNERSHIP UNIT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             For the Three Months        For the Nine Months
                                              Ended September 30,        Ended September 30,
                                           ------------------------    ------------------------
                                              1997          1996          1997          1996
                                           ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------
<S>                                        <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>       
Net Investment Income                      $  159,743    $  341,740    $  537,908    $  976,343

Percentage Allocable to Limited Partners           99%           99%           99%           99%
                                           ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------

Net Investment Income Allocable
   to Limited Partners                     $  158,146    $  338,323    $  532,529    $  966,580
                                           ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========

Weighted Average Number of Limited
   Partnership Units Outstanding            1,299,176     1,407,244     1,299,176     1,407,244
                                           ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========

Net Investment Income Per Limited
   Partnership Unit                        $      .12    $      .24    $      .41    $      .69
                                           ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 11.0

                             BTU INTERNATIONAL, INC.
         CALCULATION OF NET LOSSE PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
             (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                             For the Three Months Ended       For the Six Months Ended
                                           -------------------------------  ---------------------------
                                             June 30,          July 1,         June 30,       July 1,
                                               2002             2001             2002          2001
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                           <C>              <C>              <C>          <C>
Net loss                                      $ (1,465)        $ (1,568)        $ (2,766)     $ (1,491)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss applicable to common stockholders    $ (1,465)        $ (1,568)        $ (2,766)     $ (1,491)
=======================================================================================================

Weighted average number of shares outstanding:

     Basic Shares                            6,870,244        6,966,509        6,855,551     6,952,798
     Effect of Dilutive Options                      0                0               0              0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Diluted Shares                          6,870,244        6,966,509       6,855,551      6,952,798
=======================================================================================================
Earnings per Share
     Basic                                   $   (0.21)      $    (0.23)          (0.40)    $    (0.21)
     Diluted                                 $   (0.21)      $    (0.23)          (0.40)    $     0.21)
=======================================================================================================
</TABLE>