alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000

<CASH>                                         4,448,071
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         1,514,589
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    513,193
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        121,943,413
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,487,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,165,192
<DEPOSITS>                                     123,010,041
<SHORT-TERM>                                   1,161,847
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            5,390,000
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       774,225
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,829,079
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 140,165,192
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                2,975,461
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              7,483
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               26,652
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               3,009,596
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1,264,726
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,345,130
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1,664,466
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  171,590
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1,531,347
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                444,847
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     444,847
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   265,847
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 9.97
<LOANS-NON>                                    366,164
<LOANS-PAST>                                   2,850,331
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,338,691
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  22,981
<RECOVERIES>                                   300
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,487,600
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,487,600
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        1,419,713



</TABLE>
Order entered May 13, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00483-CV

CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant

V.

NANCY BEGGS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-14997-M

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s May 6, 2015 first unopposed motion for extension of time to file 

brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than June 12, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                 1
<CURRENCY>                                   U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 AUG-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                              1
<CASH>                                             0
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                671,317
<ALLOWANCES>                                  13,500
<INVENTORY>                                1,545,643
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           2,371,004
<PP&E>                                     1,185,401
<DEPRECIATION>                               262,252
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             3,686,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1,797,477
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      86,339
<OTHER-SE>                                 2,304,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               3,686,649
<SALES>                                      804,853
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             804,853
<CGS>                                        496,123
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                239,546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              24,883
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            50,735
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (6,434)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                      8,683
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,249
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.00
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor
Trust II  Series E (Series E), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Es Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series E.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer  
|Kenneth A. Shewer      
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 30, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MARCUS ORLANDO TAITE, )

AIS #00180664, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-00322-CG-N

)

CYNTHIA STEWART, Warden, )

Fountain Correctional Facility, )

Respondent. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo

determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, 

the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 85) dated June 28, 

2016, and made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing 

Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and S.D. Ala. GenLR 

72(a)(2)(R) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner Taite’s operative Petition for 

Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 

27) is DISMISSED as time-barred and that Taite is not entitled either to a 

Certificate of Appealability or to appeal in forma pauperis.

DONE and ORDERED this 4th day of August, 2016. 

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 SENIOR UNITED STAES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00322-CG-N Document 91 Filed 08/04/16 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Douglas H. Miller,Chief Executive Officer of EXCO Resources, Inc., certify that:

1.                                     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of EXCO Resources, Inc.;

2.                                     Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.                                     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.                                     The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.                                     The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

 
| Date:  November 6, 2007 | /s/ DOUGLAS H. MILLER   |   |
|-----------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                              | Douglas H. Miller       |
|                              | Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
P etition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 17 ,

201 2

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 1 2

- 00 3 47

- C V

____________
IN RE STEVEN BALLOR , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Probate Court No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 403486



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On April 12 , 2012 , relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See

Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. R elator asked this court to compel

the r espondent, the Honorable Loyd Wright

, presiding judge of Probate Court N o. 1 of

Harris County, Texas, to (1) rule upon relator's motion to expunge or cancel lis pendens;
and (2) direct the motion be granted

. Relator moved to expunge or cancel a lis pendens in the underlying suit. A hearing was held in October 2011, but no ruling on the motion has issued.2

M andamus is proper if the record shows the trial court was asked to rule, had a duty
to rule, and failed or refused to rule. In re Smith

, 279 S.W.3d 714, 715 (Tex. App.

-- Amarillo 200 7 , orig. proceeding). T he record shows the trial court was aware of the

motion. However, t he record does not demonstrate relator has complained to the trial court regarding his failure to rule. See Barnes v. State , 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.

-- Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding) (presenting the court with a demand for performance provides the trial court an opportunity to rule). We therefore decline to order

the trial court to rule at this time.

Even though we have jurisdiction to direct the trial court to consider and rule on pending matters, we may not tell the trial court what ruling it should make. In re Hearn
, 137 S.W.3d 681, 685 (Tex. App.

-- San Antonio 2004, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator's request that we direct the trial court to grant the motion is denied.

For these reasons, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher , and Jamison

.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BFC Financial
Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan B. Levan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       |  | /s/ Alan B. Levan      
|Name:  |  | Alan B. Levan          
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  |  | August 14, 2012
Exhibit 21.1



List of Subsidiaries of OMNOVA Solutions Inc.(1)



The following is a list of the subsidiaries of OMNOVA Solutions Inc., an Ohio corporation (the Corporation) as of
November 30, 2009. The common stock of OMNOVA Wallcovering (USA), Inc., OMNOVA Wallcovering (UK) Limited, OMNOVA Performance Chemicals (UK) Ltd.. Muraspec N.A. LLC, OMNOVA Decorative Products (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Omnova Decorative Products
(Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and OMNOVA Decorative Products (Taicang) Co., Ltd. is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by the Corporation.



|                                              |  |                                        
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Name of Corporation                           |  | State of Incorporation                 
|OMNOVA Wallcovering (USA), Inc.               |  | Ohio                                   
|OMNOVA Wallcovering (UK), Limited             |  | United Kingdom limited company         
|OMNOVA Performance Chemicals (UK) Ltd.        |  | United Kingdom limited company         
|Muraspec N.A. LLC                             |  | Delaware limited liability company     
|OMNOVA Decorative Products(Thailand) Co., Ltd |  | Thailand limited company               
|OMNOVA Decorative Products(Shanghai) Co., Ltd |  | Chinese wholly foreign owned enterprise
|OMNOVA Decorative Products(Taicang) Co., Ltd  |  | Chinese wholly foreign owned enterprise



|(1) |  | The Corporation also controls, directly or indirectly, eleven other companies that, in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant
subsidiary, as such term is defined in Rule 1-02 (w) of Regulation S-X.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 02, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 02, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21I0057. IN RE THE ESTATE OF MARY HULETT. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 18CV106
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75135-75136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29528]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP15-255-000.
    Applicants: Chesapeake Energy Marketing, L.L.C.,SND Operating, LLC.
    Description: Joint Petition for Limited Waiver and Expedited Action 
of Chesapeake Energy Marketing, L.L.C. and SND Operating, LLC.
    Filed Date: 12/9/14.
    Accession Number: 20141209-5153.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/19/14.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: PR13-63-001.
    Applicants: American Midstream (SIGCO Intrastate), LLC.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123/.224: Compliance Filing 
(PR13-63) to be effective 12/5/2014; TOFC: 790.
    Filed Date: 12/5/14.
    Accession Number: 50141205-5197.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/26/14.
    284.123(g) Protests Due:

    Docket Numbers: RP15-101-002.
    Applicants: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Comply with RP15-101 
Order regarding GTC 10 to be effective 12/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 12/9/14.
    Accession Number: 20141209-5187.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/22/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-167-001.
    Applicants: High Island Offshore System, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Capacity Release 
Amendment Filing to be effective 10/16/2014.
    Filed Date: 12/9/14.
    Accession Number: 20141209-5128.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/22/14.

    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must 
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified 
comment date.

[[Page 75136]]

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 10, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29528 Filed 12-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-24-1999
<CASH>                                              43,610
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       39,226
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        160,638
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   251,149
<PP&E>                                             909,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                     518,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,042,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              170,127
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               300
<OTHER-SE>                                         269,537
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,042,526
<SALES>                                            687,268
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   687,268
<CGS>                                              480,484
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      480,484
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   230,092
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  12,801
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (36,109)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,671
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (37,780)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (37,780)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (1.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
#### James H. Maze *v.*Elijah Clark.

Real Estate — Title by Adverse Possession.

Where one has been in the undisturbed possession of real estate by actual inclosure for more than fifteen years prior to the beginning of an action against him for such land, claiming it as his own, his title cannot be defeated.

APPEAL PROM BATH CIRCUIT COURT.

April 19, 1876.

*Nesbitt & Gudgell, for appellant.*

*V. B. Young, Reid & Stone, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

If the appellee has been in the undisturbed possession of a part of the land in controversy by actual inclosure for more than fifteen years prior to the institution of the action claiming it as his own, it defeats the appellant’s right of recovery to that extent, or if the division line between the appellee and Wright places the disputed territory within the boundary of appellee, it defeats the action. The only question presented by the record is as to the location of this dividing line; and if this boundary is fixed by the deed of partition, it must govern the rights of the parties. The appellant claims under Wright, and the lines and corners as fixed by the deed from Clark to Wright must control this case, unless it is shown that the appellee has, by actual inclosure, been in the possession of the land adversely for such a time as will present a statutory bar. The first instruction asked by counsel for appellant should have been given.

The judgment below is reversed and cause remanded with directions to award a new trial and for further proceedings consistent with'this opinion.