alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50459 

Conference Calendar

 

DONALD RAY MCCRAY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL J. MCCORMICK,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-96-CV-137

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Donald Ray McCray, # 620694, appeals the district court’s

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint as

frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (now (e)(2)(B)(i)). He

contends that Judge McCormick is not entitled to absolute

immunity. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
No. 96-50459

-2-

opinion and find no reversible error. See McCray v. McCormick,

No. A-96-CA-137-SS (W.D. Tex. Jun. 10, 1996). We further hold 

that McCray’s appeal is frivolous and dismiss it pursuant to 5th

Cir. R. 42.2.

We remind McCray that in McCray v. Lower, No. 96-20516 (5th

Cir. Aug. 21, 1996), he was barred indefinitely by this court

from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis civil appeal in this

court, or any pro se, in forma pauperis initial civil pleading in

any court which is subject to this court’s jurisdiction, without

the advance written permission of a judge of the forum court, and

that the clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal

district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to McCray,

unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this bar. We

consider this appeal only because it was filed before this bar

was imposed. To avoid additional sanctions, McCray should review

any pending appeals and withdraw any frivolous appeals

immediately.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 99.1

              Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         I, Kevin K. Albert, the Chief Executive Officer of ML-Lee Acquisition
Fund II, L.P. (the "Registrant"), certify that (i) the Form 10-Q of the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant for the periods presented.




By:
           /s/  Kevin K. Albert
           -----------------------------------------
                Kevin K. Albert
                President, ML Mezzanine II Inc.


Dated:     November 14, 2002
Classified as Microsoft Confidential

NIST Secure 

Use of LLMs 

and Generative 

AI Systems

Vivek Vinod Sharma

Senior Security Architect
Agenda  Programmatic Overview

 Managing the development of GenAI

 Managing the deployment of GenAI

 Takeaways and Actions 
Classified as Microsoft Confidential

Securing AI Committee

Microsoft Product Teams

Microsoft DSR

Programmatic Overview for Securing AI at Microsoft

Microsoft Product Security + Product Teams

MS Product Security 

(MDA) & MS Product teams

RAI and Security Champs
Classified as Microsoft Confidential

Securing Generative AI Program Strategy

Microsoft Confidential

Improving how Microsoft 

develops new AI systems

Reinforcing existing products, 

processes and systems

Reduce risk of data exposure, insider 

threat, misuse before they are enabled for 

the tenant by maintaining security and compliance

Security 

assessment for 

first-party AI systems

Reduce risk of improper use of 

LLMs and LLM tools by providing 

employee guidance and education

Consumer 

risk 

reduction

Securing Azure Tenant AI/ML 

workspaces

Protect Sensitive data 

handling within AI apps

Training and 

Awareness

Reduce the risk of data 

exposure, misuse, abuse, 

insider threat of 80K 

subscriptions 

Reduce the risk of data 

exposure when using 

third party apps and 

services

Amplify AI security 

awareness across the 

company by providing 

trainings.
Classified as Microsoft Confidential

Our process to manage developing Generative AI

Centralized Intake and Triage

• Processed at the organization level

• Reviewed by centralized team

• Appropriate teams involved (internal vs. external)

Completion of assessments 

• RAI Impact Assessment

• Security Assessment

• SDL Requirements

Review of assessments

• RAI and Security 

assessments: go/no-go

• RAI Gating team provides approval for 

different release phases
Classified as Microsoft Confidential

Our process to manage deploying Generative AI

Centralized Intake and Triage

Processed at the company-wide level

Open to all feature / product teams

Includes representatives from Engineering, Compliance, Security, Privacy, Legal

Deployment

Gated deployment triggered by tenant administrator

Publish or update employee-facing guidance / training

Completion of Risk Mitigation Activities 

Standards and policy enforcement

Approval of exceptions from senior leadership

Completion of assessments

Criteria aligned to Enterprise Risk Management framework

Risks and gaps identified and discussed
Classified as Microsoft Confidential

Data Protection: Apply labels and blocks to 

sensitive information not authorized for GenAI

systems. Limit access appropriately

Audit & Logging: Ensure all user activities, 

application activities are audited and logged

Data Poisoning: Ensure validation of skills, 

functions, and plugins to prevent system abuse. 

Ensure appropriate configurations

Prompt Injection: Inspect prompts and look for 

signs of abuse – including in code

Threat Monitoring & Response: Ensure threat 

modeling, monitoring, and response are 

present. Conduct adversarial testing.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.
---

Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Cash Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. Douglas Orr, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  November 7, 2007



/s/ R. Douglas OrrR. Douglas Orr
Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors met in open session at 10:02 a.m. on Tuesday, December 16, 2014, to consider the following matters:

*Summary Agenda:*

Disposition of minutes of previous Board of Directors' Meetings.

Memorandum and resolution re: Final Rule Integrating OTS and FDIC Flood Insurance Regulations.

Summary reports, status reports, and reports of actions taken pursuant to authority delegated by the Board of Directors.

*Discussion Agenda:*

Memorandum and resolution re: Proposed 2015 Corporate Operating Budget.

In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice Chairman Thomas M. Hoenig, seconded by Director Jeremiah O. Norton (Appointive), concurred in by Director Thomas J. Curry (Comptroller of the Currency), Director Richard Cordray (Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), and Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, that Corporation business required its consideration of the matters on less than seven days' notice to the public; and that no earlier notice of the meeting than that previously provided on December 11, 2014, was practicable.

The meeting was held in the Board Room temporarily located on the fourth floor of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street NW., Washington, DC.

Dated: December 16, 2014.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-29762 Filed 12-16-14; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
**Exhibit 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**
     We have issued our report dated February 13, 2004 (except for Note 16, asto which the date is March 16, 2004), accompanying the consolidated financialstatements included in the Annual Report of WorldQuest Networks, Inc. on Form10-KSB for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. We hereby consent tothe incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements ofWorldQuest Networks, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-107847, effective August11, 2003, File No. 333-54498, effective January 29, 2001, File No. 333-40350,effective June 28, 2000 and File No. 333-40348, effective June 28, 2000).
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
March 16, 2004
### SCWC-17-0000233 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. ROBERT A. BUKOSKI, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-17-0000233; CASE NO. 5DTA-16-00016) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C . J . , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k , a n d W i l s o n , J J . )



### Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on April 27, 2018, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, June 13, 2018. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-17-0000233 13-JUN-2018 08:17 AM
----

**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SABARNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Century Pacific Tax Credit Housing Fund-II (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the Report), I, Irwin J. Deutch, Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

     (3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

     (4) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership. 

| /s/ James Bleiler       |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |
| James Bleiler           |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| July 1, 2004            |   |

18

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH 31, 1997
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VINEYARD NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       7,634,685
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         396,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,323,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  6,009,978
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     94,587,311
<ALLOWANCE>                                    749,861
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             120,001,975
<DEPOSITS>                                 110,761,185
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,339,146
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,106,258
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,795,386
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             120,001,975
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,213,388
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               62,802
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                40,144
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,316,334
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             767,547
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             767,547
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,548,787
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   47,782
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,057
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,811,053
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 88,907
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,907
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.10
<LOANS-NON>                                    430,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    89,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              2,019,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               727,667
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   75,171
<RECOVERIES>                                    49,583
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              749,861
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           749,861
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### B. F. Turner, et al., *v.*J. W. Martin.

Landlord and Tenant — Possession.

Where a tenant agrees to take the store room of his landlord subject to a contract between the landlord and a person who was engaged in making improvements thereon, he is not entitled to possession before the contractor completes the improvements unless the delay is the result of unreasonable interference by the landlord. The landlord is not entitled to collect any rent until possession is given to the tenant.

APPEAL FROM CLARK CIRCUIT COURT.

October 16, 1874.

OpiNion by

Judge Lindsay :

We understand the stipulation in the contract between Turner & Martin that the latter “agrees to take the store room subject to the contract existing between John Graham and the said Benjamin Turner,” to mean that Martin was not to have the possession until Graham completed the improvements and repairs he was then making on the house. Martin, therefore, cannot recover damages from Turner for the delay of Graham, unless it was the result of improper or unreasonable interference by Turner.

Martin fails in his cross-petition to allege any such unreasonable or improper interference.. But his cross-petition is still further defective. He states that by reason of being kept out of possession, his drugs, medicines, etc., were greatly injured; but he fails to state the character of or extent of such injuries, or to state any fact connecting the injuries with his failure to obtain possession. But waiving the defects in his pleadings, Martin has no shadow of right to recover for the wages paid to his clerk during the five months intervening from November i, 1870, to April. 1, 1871. There is nothing in the record tending to show that he was compelled to keep the clerk, nor is there any reason assigned why the clerk, if kept, could not have followed some vocation instead of remaining idle during all this time.

*159*J. Simpson, for appellants.*

*C. & T. M. Eginton, Huston & Buckner, for appellee.*

Even if Martin was kept out of possession by the improper conduct of Turner, still he is not entitled to- recover from Turner the five months rent. He had paid no rent himself, and therefore in no event could he recover on this phase of the case, more than the. difference between the contract price and the actual rental value of the house; and there was no proof made or attempted to be made, that such actual value was greater than the contract rate.

Martin could in no possible state of case be entitled to a judgment against Mrs. Turner. For these reasons the judgment appealed from must be *reversed.*

Turner was not entitled to collect rent until Graham, who was his employe, delivered the possession to Martin; and if.Martin has paid for the whole time he occupied the premises, Turner should have no'judgment.

Judgment; *reversed*and cause remanded for further proceedings upon principles consistent with this opinion. Upon the return of the cause Martin should be allowed to amend his answer and cross-petition if he offers within a reasonable time to do so.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TASHA MICHELLE BLACKBURN, *

 *

*

Petitioner, * CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00727-WS-B 

* CRIMINAL NO. 08-00256-WS-B

vs. * 

 *

 *

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, *

*

Respondent. *

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Blackburn’s Motion To Vacate, 

Set Aside, Or Correct Sentence under § 2255 (Doc. 195) be DENIED and that Blackburn is not 

entitled to the issuance of a certificate of appealability or to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. 

DONE this 3rd day of February, 2015.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:08-cr-00256-WS-N Document 240 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

<pageID>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

p1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145863

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145863

COA: 305475

Oakland CC: 2011

- 235533

- FC

JONATHAN VINCENT HUNTER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 24, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the

cases of People v Hardy (Docket No. 144327) and People v Glenn (Docket No. 144979)

are pend ing on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases may resolve

an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the

application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those cases.
<PAGE>
                                                        EXHIBIT 12 

COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                     Six Months
                                                   Ended June 30,
                                                 ------------------
                                                   1997       1996
                                                 -------    -------
<S>                                              <C>        <C> 
Earnings:                                 
    Earnings before income tax expense            17,133     14,378
    Add:
    Interest on advances and other borrowings     36,533     27,741
    Interest component of rental expense             467        263
                                                 -------    -------
    Earnings before fixed charges excluding       54,133     42,382
      Interest on customer deposits
    Interest on customer deposits                 38,139     47,711
                                                 -------    -------
    Earnings before fixed charges                 92,272     90,093
                                                 =======    =======


Fixed Charges:
    Interest on advances and other borrowings     36,533     27,741
    Interest component of rental expense             467        263
                                                 -------    -------
    Fixed charges excluding interest on
      customer deposits                           37,000     28,004
    Interest on customer deposits                 38,139     47,711
                                                 -------    -------
    Total fixed charges                           75,139     75,715
                                                 =======    =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges including 
  interest on customer deposits                     1.23x      1.19x

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges excluding
  interest on customer deposits                     1.46x      1.51x
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF SPINNAKER EXPLORATION COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual
Report of Spinnaker Exploration Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roger L. Jarvis, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|/s/    |  | ROGER L. JARVIS        
|      
|Name:  |  | Roger L. Jarvis        
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  |  | March 11, 2004         



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Spinnaker Exploration Company and will be retained by Spinnaker Exploration Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.