alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT (21)


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                                  Jurisdiction in which
                                                  Corporate Name
                                                  Incorporated

PHARMACIA CORPORATION                             Delaware (Parent)

Subsidiaries (excluding those which when considered n the aggregate as a single
subsidiary did not constitute a significant subsidiary as of December 31, 2000:

<TABLE>
<S>                                         <C>
Monsanto Argentina SAIC                     Argentina
Monsanto Europe S.A.                        Belgium
Upjohn Coordination Center NV               Belgium
Searle Belgium, S.A.                        Belgium
Monsanto do Brasil Ltda.                    Brazil
Monsanto Company                            Delaware
Pharmacia & Upjohn Inc.                     Delaware
Pharmacia & Upjohn Company                  Delaware
G. D. Searle LLC                            Delaware
Greenstone Ltd.                             Delaware
Pharmacia & Upjohn SpA                      Italy
Pharmacia K.K.                              Japan
Pharmacia Enterprises, S.A.                 Luxembourg
Pharmacia & Upjohn International BV         Netherlands
Pharmacia & Upjohn Caribe, Inc.             Puerto Rico
Monsanto Caribe, Inc.                       Puerto Rico
Searle & Co.                                Puerto Rico
Regaine AB                                  Sweden
Pharmacia Treasury Service AB               Sweden
Pharmacia AB                                Sweden
Pharmacia Export AB                         Sweden
Pharmacia Ltd.                              United Kingdom
Monsanto P.L.C.                             United Kingdom

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1 


CFO Services Agreement


 


This CFO Services Agreement is entered
into as of May 1, 2015 between Jesus Quintero (“Quintero”), and Massroots, Inc.(the “Company”).
Quintero hereby agrees to serve as Chief Financial Officer of Massroots, Inc. for a period of one year.


 


The compensation will be paid monthly
at the beginning of each month, at a rate of USD $2,000.00. Unless otherwise directed by Quintero, all payments shall be issued
in the name of JDE Development LLC and sent to:


 


JDE Development
LLC,


16860 SW 1st Street,
Pembroke Pines, FL 33027.


 


There will be no other fees or charges by Quintero to the Company other than pre-approved
direct, third party reimbursements for costs, and pre-approved travel and related expenses.


 


Specific responsibilities of Quintero for the Company shall
include:


 


	1.		Review and analysis of the historical accounting records



	2.		Implementation of appropriate internal financial controls



	3.		Interacting with the Company’s internal accounting staff



	4.		Liaison with the Company’s auditor and securities attorney regarding filing
and reporting requirements



	5.		Preparation of financial statements including footnotes for 10Q and 10K reporting



	6.		Preparation of analysis of operations as may be required in regulatory filings



	7.		Preparation as may be required of forecasts and budgets.



	8.		Final review and signing of financial statements and regulatory filings



	9.		Maintaining the books and records and U.S. account(s) for the Company



	10.		Meeting with Company management and visits to the Company’s facilities as may
be required.



	11.		Participation at investor meetings and conferences as may be required



	12.		Responding to phone calls from the financial community and investors






Quintero and the Company agree that the performance, compensation, and time commitment
by Quintero shall be reviewed and agreed upon on an annual basis. Quintero shall be treated as a contract worker.


 


Quintero shall be entitled to reimbursement
for appropriate business expenses, as well as travel and related expenses.


 


This CFO Services Agreement shall be
in force until such time as a formal Employment Agreement is entered into by Quintero and the Company.


 


Either Quintero or the Company may
terminate this Agreement provided they give ninety (90) days written notice of the termination. Upon termination by the Company,
Quintero shall be entitled to recover from the Company, including, but not limited to, payment for all work performed through
the date of termination.


 


In the event of any dispute between
the parties arising out of or relating to this Agreement, said dispute shall be governed the laws of the State of Florida without
reference to its conflict of law rules.


 


Agreed to:


	/s/ Jesus M Quintero	5/11/15	/s/ Isaac Dietrich	5/12/15
	Jesus M Quinetro 	Date	Isaac Dietrich, CEO	Date
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4836 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4836

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 14, 2004

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Amarillo, 
Texas, as the ``Thomas E. Creek Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 
                               Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Amarillo, 
Texas, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and 
designated as the ``Thomas E. Creek Department of Veterans Affairs 
Medical Center''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document, record, or other 
paper of the United States to the medical center referred to in section 
1 shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Thomas E. Creek 
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 23.1



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



We consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated January 24, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of OMNOVA Solutions Inc.,
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended November 30, 2005,
and in the prospectuses constituting part of the following Registration Statements:



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-112530 on Form S-3,
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-100558 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-88143 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-88145 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-34938 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-88587 on Form S-3,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-88143 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-34938 on Form S-8.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Ernst & Young LLP

Akron, Ohio

January 24, 2006
#### Thomas Z. Morrow *v.*Henry R. Clouch, et al.

Infants as Plaintiffs — Jurisdiction—Technical Defense.

Whether infants are represented hy statutory guardians or not, where an action is brought for them to protect their estate the court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the same.

Technical Defense.

A purely technical defense will not he allowed to prevent infants from being deprived of their rights.

APPEAL PROM PULASKI CIRCUIT COURT.

September 23, 1874.

OpiNIon by

Judge Pryor:

It is immaterial whether the appellees were represented by a statutory guardian or not; the infants were parties, plaintiffs, in the action by *prochein ami,*presenting a state of facts that, if true, not only authorized but required the interposition of the chancellor. Both the guardian, Bachelor, and his surety, Morrow, were nonresidents, and the estate of the infants liable to be lost. A settlement was made by Bachelor showing* an indebtedness of several hundred dollars. He had left the state without making any provision for its payment, with the consent, upon his part, that Parker should be made the guardian; and it is now too late for him to question the right of Parker as guardian or as the next friend of these infants to have their small estate secured. No notice of this *74intention of the court to remove him was necessary, when he himself had consented that it should be done, and that Parker should be substituted in his place. The attachment was levied on the property of the surety, and we think in the mode required by the code by leaving the order of attachment with the occupant. The father of the two young ladies living in the property was the renter from Morrow, and had the actual control, and, we might,add, the possession at the time. That Morrow was a practising attorney in the court, appointing Bachelor guardian is no defense to the action. He voluntarily uses his name in an illegal manner, by which Bachelor is enabled to obtain the custody of these children and their small patrimony. Their money is used by a firm of which he is a member. The guardian is insolvent or refuses to account to the wards, presenting every reason why the chancellor should hold the surety responsible. The defense offered is purely technical and must be disregarded in a case like this. Morrow was a non-resident when this action was instituted and the attachment was therefore sustained. The judgment should direct the time, terms and place of sale as well as the mode of advertising. This has not been done and for this cause alone the judgment is *reversed*with directions to enter a judgment directing the lot to be sold as provided in See. 253, Civil Code.

*R. M. and W. 0. Bradley, Thomas Z. Morrow, for appellant.*

*Denton & Curd, A. J. and D. James, for appellees.*

The commissioner should advertise at least fifteen days before sale at the court house door and three other public places in the vicinity of the lot, unless there is some special act in regard to such advertisements applicable to the county.
##### 



Doral Financial Corporation
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 For the six month period endedJune 30, 2006Including Interest on DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax loss from continuing operations
    
    $
    (62,744)Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    343,554Total Earnings
    
    $
    280,810Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    341,036Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized
expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    1,020An estimate of the interest component within
rental expense
    
    
    1,498Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    343,554Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    (A
    )Excluding Interest on DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax loss from continuing operations
    
    $
    (62,744
    )Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    273,339Total Earnings
    
    $
    210,595Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    270,821Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized
expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    1,020An estimate of the interest component within
rental expense
    
    
    1,498Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    273,339Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    (A
    )
 
 (A)
    
    Due to the Companys pre-tax loss in the first six months of 2006, the ratio coverage was less than 1:1.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GREGORY HUNT (#Z-521 - N-6), *

 *

 Plaintiff, *

 *

vs. * CIVIL ACTION NO.12-00752-WS-B

 *

WALTER MYERS, *

 *

 Defendants. *

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this 

file deemed relevant to the issue raised, and there having been 

no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED

as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s 

Motion to Reinstate the Department of Correction (Doc. 48) is 

DENIED as futile.

DONE this 29th day of September, 2014.

 s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00752-WS-B Document 60 Filed 09/29/14 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

*Notice is hereby given*                     that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as Receiver for First Choice Community Bank, Dallas, Georgia (“the Receiver”) intends to terminate its receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed receiver of First Choice Community Bank on April 29, 2011. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors.                

Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this Notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing and sent within thirty days of the date of this Notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 32.1, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.

No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be considered which are not sent within this time frame.

Dated: December 16, 2014.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-29758 Filed 12-18-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
EXHIBIT 32

                                   CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the annual report of California Service Stations, Inc.
(the "Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2004,Vincent Sammarro
hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
his knowledge:

            (1)   The annual  report fully complies with the  requirements of
                  Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The  information  contained  in the  annual  report  fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Vincent Sammaro
Vincent Sammarro
President
(principal executive officer
November 30, 2004





<PAGE>
**EXHIBIT 15**

To the Board of Directors andShareholder of

Allstate Life Insurance Companyof New York:

 

We have reviewed, in accordancewith standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (UnitedStates), the unaudited interim financial information of Allstate Life InsuranceCompany of New York for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September30, 2004 and 2003, as indicated in our report dated November 10, 2004; becausewe did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on such financialinformation.

 

We are aware that our reportreferred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, is incorporated by reference inthe following Registration Statements:

 

| **Form S-3 Registration Nos.** | ** ** | **Form  N-4 Registration Nos.** |
|--------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------|
| 333-58512                      |       | 333-68344                       |
| 333-100029                     |       | 333-81970                       |
|                           |       | 333-94785                       |
|                           |       | 033-65381                       |

 

We also are aware that theaforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared orcertified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountantwithin the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

 
| /s/Deloitte  & Touche LLP |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |
| Chicago,  Illinois            |
| November 10,  2004            |

 

E-2

----
Judgment 1

AO 245D (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations (12019)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE

V. (For Revocation of Supervised Release)

MARCUS O’NEAL THOMAS

CASE NUMBER: 1:12-CR-00009-001

USM NUMBER: 12502-003

THE DEFENDANT: Patrick C. Finnegan, Esquire

Defendant's Attorney

admitted guilt to violation of supervision conditions 7 and Special as set forth in the Petition dated 

1/21/2016.

was found in violation of supervision condition: ___

Violation Number Nature of Violation

Date violation

Occurred

7

Special

Technical

Technical

The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 2 of this judgment. The sentence is imposed 

pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.

The defendant has not violated condition(s) and is discharged as to such violation(s) 

condition.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States Attorney for this 

district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, 

and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid.

February 10, 2016

Date of Imposition of Judgment

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

February 12, 2016

Date

X

Case 1:12-cr-00009-CG-B Document 48 Filed 02/12/16 Page 1 of 2
Judgment 2

AO 245D (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations: Sheet 2 - Imprisonment

Defendant: MARCUS O’NEAL THOMAS 

Case Number: 1:12-CR-00009-001

IMPRISONMENT

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be 

imprisoned for a total term of THREE (3) MONTHS

The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons: 

The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district:

at .m. on .

as notified by the United States Marshal.

The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of 

Prisons:

before 2 p.m. on .

as notified by the United States Marshal.

as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office.

RETURN

I have executed this judgment as follows:

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

Defendant delivered on to at __________________

with a certified copy of this judgment.

 UNITED STATES MARSHAL 

By _________________________________

 Deputy U.S. Marshal

X

Case 1:12-cr-00009-CG-B Document 48 Filed 02/12/16 Page 2 of 2
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No

. 201 700007

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v. 

### DAISJURR A. SOSVILLE Aviation Machinist’s Mate Airman (E

- 3 ), U

. S

. Navy Appellant

______________

___________ Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: C aptain Bethany L. Payton

- O’Brien, JAGC, USN

. Convening Authority: C ommanding Officer, Strike Fighter Squadron

ONE FIVE FOUR
, Lemoore, CA. Staff Judge Advocate’s R ecommendation: Lieutenant Commander M.S. Bailey, JAGC, USN. For Appellant : Captain Armando A. Rodriquez

- Feo, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ Decided 17 M arch 2017

_________________________ Before C AMPBELL , H UTCHISON , and E LLINGTON , Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of M ilitary Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court