alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I, Linden Boyne, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Bioaccelerate Inc (FKA
Westminster Medical Inc);

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 14, 2003





                                       /s/ Linden Boyne
                                       -----------------------
                                       Linden Boyne
                                       Secretary and Director
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 74782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29378]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express Negotiated Service 
Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Effective date: December 16, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 9, 2014, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail 
Express Contract 22 to Competitive Product List. Documents are 
available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2015-15, CP2015-19.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Requirements.
[FR Doc. 2014-29378 Filed 12-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
T – Temperature (G. Strouse, 221/A242) D – Dimensional (T. Doiron) M – Mass (G. Harris, 101/B11)

V – Volume (J. Wright, 230/105) E – Electrical (J. FitzPatrick, 218/E020) Ph – Photometry (M. Nadal, 22/B317)

P – Pressure (Doug Olson, 220/B39)

SIM Metrology School

FINAL PROGRAM

TIMETABLE 10/28/2013 10/29/2013 10/30/2013 10/31/2013 11/01/2013

8:30AM – 9:00 AM Intro/Welcome

Willie May, NIST

Mass/Density 

Force/Torque

Francisco Garcia

CESMEC

Statistics and 

Uncertainty

Antonio Possolo

NIST

Electrical

Dave Inglis

NRC

Legal Metrology

Carol Hockert

NIST 9:00AM - 9:30AM International Metrology

Jim Olthoff

9:30AM – 9:45AM NIST Metrology 

Challenges of 

Climate Science

James 

Whetstone

NIST

Pressure

Doug Olson

NIST

Chemistry

David Duewer

Katrice Lippa

NIST

9:45AM - 10:00AM BREAK

10:00AM - 10:30AM

Temperature

Edgar Mendez

CENAM

10:30AM – 11:00AM BREAK BREAK BREAK BREAK

11:00AM – 11:30AM Volume/Flow

Roberto Arias

CENAM

Dimensional

Ted Doiron

NIST

Time and 

Frequency

Raul Solis

CENAMEP

Photometry

Yoshi Ohno

NIST

Quality

Gabriela de la 

Guardia

CENAMEP

11:30AM – 12:00PM

12:00PM - 1:00PM LUNCH

1:00PM – 1:30PM

T T V V D D M M

Site Visit

E E

Ph P

Bio-metrology

Marc Salit

NIST

1:30PM – 2:00PM

2:00PM – 2:30PM P Ph Bio/Chem Tours

MML, NIST 2:30PM – 3:00PM

3:00PM – 3:30PM BREAK BREAK BREAK

3:30PM – 4:00PM

V V T T M M D D

P Ph

E E

Final Exam

4:00PM – 4:30PM BREAK

4:30PM – 5:00PM Ph P Graduation 5:00PM - 5:30PM
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 174 

To prohibit the provision of Federal funds to a labor organization the 

members of which are education professionals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. JACKSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. NEHLS, Mrs. MILLER

of Illinois, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, Mr. CLYDE, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. MOORE

of Alabama, Mr. WEBER of Texas, and Mr. BUCK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the provision of Federal funds to a labor organization the members of which are education professionals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Federal Funding 

5 for Teacher’s Unions Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 174 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDS FOR CERTAIN 

2 LABOR ORGANIZATIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—No Federal funds may be pro4 vided to a labor organization the members of which are 

5 education professionals. 

6 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

7 (1) EDUCATION PROFESSIONAL.—The term 

8 ‘‘education professional’’ means an individual who is 

9 employed by an elementary school, secondary school, 

10 local educational agency, State educational agency, 

11 or institution of higher education. 

12 (2) ESEA TERMS.—The terms ‘‘elementary 

13 school’’, ‘‘local educational agency’’, ‘‘secondary 

14 school’’, and ‘‘State educational agency’’ have the 

15 meanings given such terms in section 8101 of the 

16 Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 

17 (20 U.S.C. 7801). 

18 (3) INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION.—The 

19 term ‘‘institution of higher education’’ has the 

20 meaning given such term in section 101 of the High21 er Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1001). 

22 (4) LABOR ORGANIZATION.—The term ‘‘labor 

23 organization’’ has the meaning given such term in 

24 section 2(5) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

25 U.S.C. 152(5)). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Dear	Prospective	Meeting	Participant

On	behalf	of	the	Organizing	Committee,	thank	you	for	your	interest	in	participating	in	the	Second

International	Symposium	on	Forensic	Science	Error	Management,	which	will	be	held	July	24-28,	2017 in	

Gaithersburg,	M.D.		More	than	400 attendees	from	all	disciplines	of	forensics	are	expected	to	attend	this	

four-day	scientific	meeting.		All	attendees	will	be	offered the	opportunity	to	present	and	discuss	cutting	

edge	research,	network	with	peers	and	advance	their	careers.		In	addition,	attendees	will	learn	about	

new	technologies	by	meeting	exhibitors	at	the	exposition	during	the	conference.

We	would	be	delighted	to	have	you	join	us	in	Gaithersburg,	M.D.		Personal	invitations	are	not	necessary	

to	attend	since	this	International	Symposium	is	an	open	scientific	event	for	all	persons	who	are	

members	of	the	forensics	community	and	pay	the	necessary	registration	fee.		The	second meeting	is	

announced	to	the	scientific	community	through	publications,	emails,	websites,	during	the	annual	call	for	

papers,	and	publication	of	the	preliminary	program.		Beginning	in	late	March,	the	technical	program	and	

registration	will	be available	from	the	conference	website at	www.nist.gov.

The	organizers	or	its	sponsors	are	not	able	to	provide	financial	support	to	meeting	participants.		Airfare,	

ground	transportation,	hotel,	meals,	travel	insurance,	and	any	other	meeting-related	expenses	are	the	

responsibility	of	the	each	meeting	participant.

If	you	need	to	apply	for	a	temporary	non-immigrant	visa	to	attend	the	conference,	you	are	advised	to	

apply	for	your	visa	as	soon	as	possible	and	no	later	than	3-4	months	in	advance	of	the	meeting	date.		All	

applicants	must	be	able	to	quality	for	a	visa	on	their	own	merits	under	the	requirements	of	the	

Immigration	and	Nationality	Act.		The	organizers	cannot	intervene	with	the	U.S.	State	Department	or	an	

American	embassy	in	another	country	on	behalf	of the	any	meeting	participant.		You	can	submit	this	

letter	with	your	visa	application	to	verify	the	name,	dates,	location,	and	purpose	of	the	meeting.

The	organizers	are	not able	to	call	or	generate	personal	letters	to	the	embassy	or	consulate	on	your	

behalf.		A	separate	email	will	be	generated	for	meeting	presenters	at	the	time	an	abstract	has	been	

submitted	and	a	personalized	letter	will	be	generated	when	the	meeting	presenter’s	abstract	has	been	

accepted	for	presentation.		Meeting	registration	will	open	in	March	31,	2017.			A	registration	receipt	will	

also	be	generated	for	meeting	participants.

Additional	information	on	the	visa	process	can	be	obtained	from	the	U.S.	Department	of	State.

We	look	forward	to	seeing	you	at the First	International	Symposium	on	Forensic	Science	Error	

Management	– Detection,	Measurement,	and	Mitigation,	which	will	be	held	July	24-28,	2017 in	

Gaithersburg,	M.D.		

Sincerely,

Mark	Stolorow,	Conference	Chair
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


1.    Dignity Prestige SDN BHD, a Malaysia corporation
2.    DirectAmerica Corporation, a Delaware corporation
3.    Multi-Media Distribution Center, Inc., a Delaware corporation
4.    Nancy Langston & Associates, Inc., a Delaware corporation
5.    National Media Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
6.    National Media Marketing Corporation, a Delaware corporation
7.    National Media Media Corp., a Delaware corporation
8.    NPA Realty Corp., a New York corporation
9.    Positive Response Media, Inc., a California corporation
10.   Positive Response Seminars, Inc., a California corporation
11.   Positive Response Telemarketing, Inc., a California corporation
12.   Positive Response Television, Inc., a Delaware corporation
13.   PRDISC, Inc., a California corporation
14.   Prestige Marketing Limited, a New Zealand corporation
15.   Quantum Asia, a Hong Kong joint venture
16.   Quantum Far East Ltd., a New Zealand corporation
17.   Quantum International Japan Company Ltd., a Japanese corporation
18.   Quantum International Limited, a United Kingdom corporation
19.   Quantum Marketing International, Inc., a Delaware corporation
20.   Quantum Marketing Mexico S.A. de C.V., a Mexico corporation
21.   Quantum North America, Inc., a Delaware corporation
22.   Quantum Polska Sp. Z.o.o., a Poland corporation
23.   Quantum Productions AG, a Switzerland corporation
24.   Suzanne Paul Holdings Pty Limited, an Australian corporation
25.   Suzanne Paul (Australia) Pty Limited, an Australian corporation
26.   Telemall Shopping Pty Ltd., an Australian corporation
#### The Etchison Ditching Association *v.*Busenback.

Draining *Association.—Suit on Assessment.—Defect in Articles of Associa*tion.—In a suit by a draining association to compel the payment of an assessment made upon the lands of the defendant, the articles of association are not properly part of the complaint, and if it be attempted to make them a part thereof, advantage cannot be taken of a defect in them by demurrer.

APPEAL from the Madison Circuit Court.

Downey, J.

This was a suit to compel the payment of an assessment made on the lands of the appellee in favor of said draining association. The defendant demurred to the . complaint, on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and his demurrer was sustained. The plaintiff excepted, and appealed to this court,' and has here assigned this ruling of the court for error.

The only point discussed by counsel is, whether the description of the drain in the articles of association is sufficiently definite or not. Counsel for the appellant contend that it is, while counsel for the appellee insist that it is not.

The question is supposed to be before us, because a copy of the articles of association is filed with the complaint and referred to therein.

It was held by this court, in *The Jordan Ditching and*
      *363
      *Draining Association*v. *Wagoner,*33 Ind. 50, that in an action like this, the complaint need not contain the articles of association, or allege their substance; and in *The Excelsior Draining Co.*v. *Brown,*38 Ind. 384, it was decided that the articles of association are not made a part of the complaint by the filing of a copy thereof with the complaint, and referring to it in the complaint. The action is not founded on the articles of association, and they are neither necessarily nor properly made a part of it!

*M. S. Robinson*and *W. March,*for appellant.

*y. W. Sansberry, E. B. Goodykoontz,*and *D. Moss,*for appellee.

It being conceded that the demurrer was sustained to the complaint for a matter thus entirely outside of it, and there being no objection shown to the complaint itself, the demurrer was improperly sustained.

■ The judgment is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Foundry
Networks, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy D. Heffner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Timothy D.
Heffner




Timothy D. Heffner Vice President Finance and
Administration, Chief Financial Officer March 15, 2004


---
<PAGE> 1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                           CONSENT OF COMPANY COUNSEL

    I hereby consent to the reference to Company counsel in the "Commitments
and Contingencies" note to the financial statements in the Company's 1996
Annual Report to shareowners and incorporated in the Company's Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-36636, 2-76696, 2-90152, 33-13197, 33-21030,
33-39704, 33-39705, 33-39706, 33-39707, 33-49717, 33-53363, 33-53365,
33-53367, 333-02783, 333-02961 and 333-02963) and on Form S-3 (No. 33-60189).
In giving this consent I do not thereby admit that I am within the category of
persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of
1933.

                                    /S/ R. WILLIAM IDE III

                                    R. WILLIAM IDE III
                                    General Counsel
                                    Monsanto Company

Saint Louis, Missouri
March 24, 1997

                                       25
Exhibit 10.113

 

LETTER OF UNDERTAKING

 

	
To:
    	
Navig8 Crude   Tankers Inc
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date:
    	
17   December 2013
    


 

Dear Sirs,

 

We, Navig8 Limited, refer to the MUSD 160 private placement (the “Private Placement”) by Navig8 Crude Tankers Inc (the “Issuer”).

 

We hereby undertake (the “Undertaking”) to the Issuer that, for as long as Navig8 Limited and any of its (direct or indirect) subsidiaries are contracted to provide any services to the Issuer in respect of its crude tankers, Navig8 Limited will (and will cause its controlled affiliates to):

 

	
(i)
    	
grant the Issuer   a right of first refusal in respect of all new opportunities that Navig8   Limited has to purchase and own VLCC vessels; and
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
(ii)
    	
not compete with   the Issuer by owning VLCC vessels, save where the Issuer has rejected the   opportunity offered in accordance with the right of first refusal in   (i) above.
    


 

This Undertaking shall be for the benefit of the Issuer (including its direct and indirect subsidiaries) and the investors in the Private Placement.

 

This Undertaking shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with English law and disputes are to be settled by LMAA arbitration in London.

 

For and on behalf of,

 

Navig8 Limited

 

	
/s/ Peder J.   Moller
    	
 
    
	
Name: Peder   J. Moller
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:   Director
    	
 
    


 

1
#### Thomas A. Dorsey *v.*James H. Sears.

Husband and Wife — Liability of Wife for Necessaries.

Where goods are purchased on the wife’s credit by the husband and were necessaries for the family, the estate of the wife may be subjected to pay for them.

APPEAL FROM NICHOLAS CIRCUIT COURT.

February 10, 1876.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The evidence is conclusive that the goods were purchased upon the credit of the wife and were necessaries for the family. The word necessaries includes not only such articles as were purchased by the wife, but such as were purchased by the husband and charged to the wife for his use.

The husband purchased clothes that w'ere suitable to his condition in life, and of no greater value than the wife with her small estate could afford to expend upon him. He was insolvent. The account was charged to the wife, and every article purchased or with which she was charged were necessaries for the family. It was not necessary that she should have given her obligation with the husband at the time she *bought*the goods. After the account fell due the husband and wife executed their joint note for the money, and the credit having been given to her, the estate of the wife should have been subjected to its payment. The merchant and his clerk both make out a clear case under the statute, and the only evidence relied on to rebut their statements is that of the husband, and his statements conduce to corroborate their testimony.

In purchasing boards to cover part of the building owned by the wife, the husband gave to the merchant an order in the wife’s name *606to pay the vendor in goods and charge to the wife. This could not iiave been done if the credit was given to the husband or the latter looked to for payment of the account. Contracts made by the husband for his own purposes, such as the purchase of stock or the renting of lands, may not come within the rule, but as the facts are presented in this record there is no reason for shielding the estate of the wife from the payment of these goods.

*Thomas*Kennedy, *for appellant. Hargis &*Norvell, *for appellee.*

The only appeal on this record is that of Dorsey against the appellee. The judgment dismissing the petition as to Dorsey is *reversed*and cause remanded with directions to subject the estate of the wife to the payment of the debt.
No. 87-6294.

#### Townes *v.*Test, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT      32.****2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (a) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b) | Information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                May 19, 2006 | /s/                Steven D. Hargreaves |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                               | By:                Steven D. Hargreaves |
|                               | Chief                Financial Officer  |

----