alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 243 (Thursday, December 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 75593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29585]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[Funding Opportunity Number: FOA-ETA-15-01]


Notice of Availability of Funds and Funding Opportunity 
Announcement for the National Guard Youth ChalleNGe and Job ChalleNGe 
Program

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice of Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Employment and Training Administration (ETA), U.S. 
Department of Labor, announces the availability of approximately 
$12,000,000 in grant funds authorized by Section 171, Pilot and 
Demonstration Projects, of the Workforce Investment Act, to: (1) Test 
the effectiveness of expanding the National Guard Youth ChalleNGe 
Program for youth who have come in contact with the juvenile justice 
system for committing a status offense or a delinquent act (court-
involved youth), and (2) add and test an additional job training 
component (DOL Job ChalleNGe) to the program for court-involved youth 
and youth that have had no contact with the juvenile justice system 
(non-court-involved youth).
    The purpose of this program is to improve the long-term labor 
market prospects of youth who successfully complete the six-month 
residential phase of the National Guard Youth ChalleNGe program. The 
DOL Job ChalleNGe component will build on the Youth ChalleNGe program's 
eight core components--academic excellence, life coping skills, job 
skills, health and hygiene, responsible citizenship, community service, 
leadership/followership, and physical fitness--by emphasizing 
programming focused on improving program participants' employment 
outcomes.
    The complete FOA and any subsequent FOA amendments in connection 
with this solicitation are described in further detail on ETA's Web 
site at http://www.doleta.gov/grants/ or on http://www.grants.gov. The 
Web sites provide application information, eligibility requirements, 
review and selection procedures, and other program requirements 
governing this solicitation.

DATES: The closing date for receipt of applications under this 
announcement is January 27, 2015. Applications must be received no 
later than 4:00:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pia Miller, 200 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Room N-4716, Washington, DC 20210; Telephone: 202-693-3153.
    The Grant Officer for this FOA is Melissa Abdullah.

    Signed December 12, 2014 in Washington, DC
Eric D. Luetkenhaus,
Grant Officer/Division Chief, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-29585 Filed 12-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FT-P
#### Mississippi Central Railroad Company *v.*D. J. Munchison.

Written Contract — Defense of Fraud in Execution.

Before plaintiff can be relieved from tbe terms of a written contract be must aver and prove facts showing his right to such relief. A judgment rendered in his favor against a railroad company for trespass will be reversed when not sustained by evidence.

APPEAL FROM FULTON CIRCUIT COURT.

February 11, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

The appellee admits the execution of the writing exhibited in the appellant’s answer, by which the former relinquished to the latter the right of way to the extent of one hundred feet for the construction of its railroad. It is now insisted that the writing, or its execution, was obtained by fraud on the part of appellant’s agent; and upon this issue, the jury, from the facts and under the instructions given, rendered a verdict for $1,000 damages.

We have been unable to discover from the proof either fraud or mistake in its execution. The appellee signed the relinquishment, or rather directed the agent of the company to affix his name to it, after it had been fully explained to him. The most of this paper was printed matter, containing the terms and extent of relinquishment, and with this in the agent’s hands, and the names of others affixed, and every opportunity afforded appellee to know what he was doing, he had his name affixed, and now says that he only relinquished eight feet of ground; and not only so, but he permits the company to make the bed of the road through his entire tract, and when completed instituted this action of trespass against the company for an alleged unlawful entry on his land.

The facts are so inconsistent with appellee’s theory of the case *358that, independent of the positive proof on the part of the appellant contained in the writing exhibited, as well as the statements of the agent and those who heard appellee’s talk in regard to what he had done, there would be much hesitation in sustaining such a verdict.

*I. M.*Bigger, *for appellant.*

*H. A. Tyler, for Appellee.*

If the company has directed those in its employ, or without such direction, if, in the necessary construction of the work, and as incidental to it, the hands of the company have injured the land of appellant outside of the boundaiy relinquished, he has his remedy. He was certainly not entitled to' recover for any trespass within the 100 feet for an injury to the soil within this boundary.

The judgment is *reversed*and cause remanded with directions to award the appellant a new trial, and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20

- 0576 V

UNPUBLISHED

JOHN McFARLAND

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: August 24, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;
Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;
Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Jo nathan Svitak, Shannon Law Group, Woodbridge, IL , for P etitioner.

Kyle Pozza , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On May 8, 2020

, John McFarland filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) as a result of an influenza ( “ flu ” ) vaccine received on October 2,

2018 . Petition at ¶¶ 2, 19 . The case was assigned to the S pecial Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On August 24, 2021

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, it is R espondent ’ s position that Petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction in his left shoulder; Petitioner ’ s pain and reduced range of

1 Because this unpublished R uling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the R uling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material f its within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pert inent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2 motion occurred within 48 hours of receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; Petitioner ’ s

s ymptoms were limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no

other condition or abnormality has been i dentified to explain his symptoms

. Id. at 4

.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

** **

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in each of the Registration Statement (on Form S-8,Registration No. 333-37700) pertaining to the Gaiam, Inc. 1999Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Gaiam, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock PurchasePlan, the Registration Statement (on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-89726)pertaining to the Gaiam, Inc. 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan, and theRegistration Statement (on Form S-3, Registration No. 333-147237) of our report dated March 12,2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of Gaiam, Inc. and subsidiaries included in the AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 
|  | /s/ Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC |
|--|--------------------------------------------------|

 

Denver,Colorado

March 17, 2008

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DWIGHT BOYKIN, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CA 09-0747-WS-C

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, :

Commissioner of Social Security,

:

Defendant.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the

issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated April 19, 2010 is

ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

DONE this 11th day of May, 2010.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00747-WS-C Document 17 Filed 05/11/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.1



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
Registration Statements:



|   |  |                                                                                                                                                                  
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. |  | Registration Statement No. 333-155731 on Form S-3 of OMNOVA Solutions Inc.;                                                                                      
|2. |  | Registration Statement No. 333-162305 on Form S-8 pertaining to the OMNOVA Solutions Inc. Second Amended and Restated 1999 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan;
|3. |  | Registration Statement No. 333-160509 on Form S-8 pertaining to the OMNOVA Solutions Retirement Savings Plan;                                                    
|4. |  | Registration Statement No. 333-100558 on Form S-8 pertaining to the OMNOVA Solutions Inc. Amended and Restated 1999 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan;       
|5. |  | Registration Statement No. 333-88145 on Form S-8 pertaining to the OMNOVA Solutions Inc. 1999 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan;                             
|6. |  | Registration Statement No. 333-34938 on Form S-8 pertaining to the OMNOVA Solutions Retirement Savings Plan;                                                     
|7. |  | Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-34938 on Form S-8 pertaining to the OMNOVA Solutions Retirement Savings Plan;                   



of our report dated January 24, 2011, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. and our report dated January 24, 2011, with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of OMNOVA Solutions Inc., both included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
OMNOVA Solutions Inc. for the year ended November 30, 2010.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Akron, Ohio

January 24, 2011
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Whitehall Limited, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                 
|-----------------
|/s/ Kay Carter   
|Kay Carter       
|September 1, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         444,460
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,802,180
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,000
<INVENTORY>                                    722,425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,390,585
<PP&E>                                       1,657,748
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,889,716
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,240,666
<BONDS>                                      1,611,193
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,417,596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,889,716
<SALES>                                      9,938,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,938,742
<CGS>                                          993,003
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,837,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,488,182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                592,321
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            349,471
<DISCONTINUED>                                 349,471
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   349,471
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1692 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve affordability and 

reduce premium costs of health insurance for consumers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2023 

Ms. UNDERWOOD (for herself, Mr. ALLRED, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Ms. BLUNT

ROCHESTER, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. COHEN, Ms. DELAURO, Ms. 

LOIS FRANKEL of Florida, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Ms. KUSTER, Ms. 

MANNING, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. POCAN, Ms. PORTER, Mr. QUIGLEY, Ms. SCANLON, Mr. SCHIFF, Ms. SCHRIER, Ms. SEWELL, Mr. SOTO, and Mr. TRONE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve 

affordability and reduce premium costs of health insurance for consumers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Care Afford5 ability Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1692 IH

1 SEC. 2. IMPROVE AFFORDABILITY AND REDUCE PREMIUM 

2 COSTS OF HEALTH INSURANCE FOR CON3 SUMERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 36B(b)(3)(A)(i) of the In5 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as fol6 lows: 

7 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Except as pro8 vided in clause (ii), the applicable percent9 age for any taxable year shall be the per10 centage such that the applicable percent11 age for any taxpayer whose household in12 come is within an income tier specified in 

13 the following table shall increase, on a slid14 ing scale in a linear manner, from the ini15 tial premium percentage to the final pre16 mium percentage specified in such table 

17 for such income tier: 

‘‘In the case of household 

income (expressed as 

a percent of poverty line) 

within the following income tier: 

The initial 

premium 

percentage is— 

The final 

premium 

percentage is— 

Up to 150.0 percent ................................... 0.0 0.0

150.0 percent up to 200.0 percent ............. 0.0 2.0

200.0 percent up to 250.0 percent ............. 2.0 4.0

250.0 percent up to 300.0 percent ............. 4.0 6.0

300.0 percent up to 400.0 percent ............. 6.0 8.5

400.0 percent and higher ........................... 8.5 8.5’’. 

18 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 1692 IH

1 (1) Section 36B(c)(1)(A) of the Internal Rev2 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘but does 

3 not exceed 400 percent’’. 

4 (2) Section 36B(b)(3)(A) of such Code is 

5 amended by striking clause (iii). 

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

8 December 31, 2022. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
---



Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Cash Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
 date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. Douglas Orr, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 8, 2007



/s/ R. Douglas OrrR. Douglas Orr
Chief Financial Officer
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-16,658-02

EX P ARTE CHES TER DUANE MILLER, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 6225-A IN THE 259 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM JONES COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Art icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s co n v i cted of murder and sentenc ed to six ty

year s’ imprisonment. Applicant alleg es the failure to awa rd him good time cr edits and to adjust his tim e ea rning status violates his right to due proce ss. The habea s court, afte r rec eiving an aff idavi t from TDCJ detailing the status of Applicant’s time cre dits, rec ommends that this Court grant Applicant the time to which he is entitled. Acc ording to TDCJ , Applicant’s time was adjusted in Marc h 2016 to ref lect that he complete d an on the job tra ining program in De cembe r 2000.2

This Court does not co n s i d er matters such as loss of g ood time cre dit, disciplinary proce eding s, and inmate classification by way of a writ o f h ab eas corpus. Ex parte Palomo , 759 S.W .2d 671, 674 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Ex parte Brager , 704 S.W .2d 46 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986). Applicant’s c laim is not cognizable on ha beas c orpus. We deny

relief

. Filed: June 8, 2016 Do not publish
EXHIBIT 10.44

 

Addendum #5 to the Revolving Line of Credit Agreement

 

	
[$152,723.62]

	
[3/31/2015]




 

This Addendum to the Revolving Line of Credit Agreement by and between Elite Data Services, Inc., a Florida Corporation (the "BORROWER") and Sarah Myers an Individual ("LENDER") is made and executed as of the date referred to above. An additional principal sum totaling Thirteen Thousand Six Hundred and Ninety-Four Dollars and Forty-Five cents ($13,694.45) has been added to the Revolving Line of Credit Agreement Promissory Note dated September 1, 2013 (the "LOAN AGREEMENT"), bringing the Loan Agreement to a total sum of One Hundred and Fifty-two Thousand Seven Hundred and Twenty-Three Dollars and sixty-two cents ($152,723.62). The default date under the Loan Agreement is December 31, 2015.

 

This Addendum shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of Florida.

 

	
 

	
By:

	
/s/ Charles Rimlinger

	
 


		 	
Charles Rimlinger, CEO

	
 




 

	
 

	
By:

	
/s/ Sarah Myers

	
 


		 	
Sarah Myers, Lender
<PAGE> 1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

MONSANTO COMPANY:

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in Monsanto Company's
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-36636, 2-76696, 2-90152, 33-13197,
33-21030, 33-39704, 33-39705, 33-39706, 33-39707, 33-49717, 33-53363,
33-53365, 33-53367, 333-02783, 333-02961 and 333-02963) and on Form S-3 (No.
33-60189) of our opinions dated February 28, 1997, appearing in and
incorporated by reference in this annual report on Form 10-K of Monsanto
Company for the year ended December 31, 1996.

                                                       /S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

                                                       DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Saint Louis, Missouri
March 24, 1997

                            ------------------------
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 99

                     Audit Representation Letter to the SEC


                                       March 27, 2002


United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:  Temporary Final Rule and Final Rule:
     Requirements for Arthur Andersen LLP Auditing Clients

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Arthur Andersen LLP, our independent auditor has made the following
representation to us:

The audits as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2001 were subject to Andersen's quality control
system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable
assurance that the engagements were conducted in compliance with professional
standards, that there were appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working
on the audit, and availability of national office consultation. Availability of
personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen is not relevant to these
audits.


                                       Foundry Networks, Inc.



                                        By: /s/ Timothy D. Heffner
                                           -----------------------------------
                                               Timothy D. Heffner
                                           Vice President, Finance &
                                           Administration, Chief Financial
                                           Officer