alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31


                                                  CERTIFICATIONS
I, Vincent Sammarro, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of California Service
Stations,  Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 30, 2004

/s/ Vincent Sammarro
President
#### James Bennett *v.*J. D. Smith’s Adm’r.

Decedent’s Estate — Parties to Petition to Sell Real Estate.

The heirs of a decedent must be made parties to a petition of an administrator to sell real estate to pay debts, and where they are named as defendants, but join the administrator as plaintiffs, an order of sale procured in such action will not be set aside.

APPEAL PROM MADI'SON CIRCUIT COURT.

November 4, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

In the original suit brought by the administrator of J. D. Smith, deceased, his heirs were not made parties; but by an amended petition the heirs with their guardian united as plaintiffs with the administrator, and while the petition is not sworn to, the plaintiffs therein are no less bound by its allegations; and if they were made by the attorneys without their authority they will be responsible to those they profess to represent, the attorneys having signed the amended petition.

It is manifest from the-statements of the administrator and the report of the master that the personal assets were insufficient to pay the debts of the intestate, and that a sale of at least a part of the real estate was necessary for that purpose. In such cases Sec. 465 of the Civil Code, authorizes the personal representative, an heir, devisee, legatee, distributee, or creditor of a deceased person, to institute an -action by equitable proceedings for the settlement of his estate, and if the personal representative or heir may institute an action for the purpose they certainly may join in the prosecution of such an action when it shall be necessary, as in this case, that such an action shall be prosecuted. And although the creditors may not be specially named as defendants, still, by presenting their claims and proving them before the master, they make themselves defendants to the action.

As, therefore, the sale of a part of the real estate of-the intestate was necessary for the payment of his debts, and as his heirs have *203joined as plaintiffs in the suit to procure the sale of the town lots described, they will be concluded by the judgment of sale, and their title will pass to the purchaser at the judicial sale by the deed of the court’s commissioner.

*Chenault &*Bennett, *for appellant.*

*Turner &*Smith, *Bronston, for appellees.*

The court below, therefore, did not err in refusing to set aside the sale, and the judgment is *affirmed.*
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CASSANDRA MATTHEWS, )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION 14-00601-KD-N

 ) 

CITY OF MOBILE, )

Defendant. )

JUDGMENT

In conjunction with the Order issued on this date, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and

DECREED that Judgment is entered against Plaintiff Cassandra Matthews and in favor of

Defendant the City of Mobile. It is further ORDERED that all of Plaintiff’s Cassandra 

Matthews’ claims against Defendant the City of Mobile are DISMISSED.

DONE and ORDERED this 2nd day of May 2016.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00601-KD-N Document 76 Filed 05/02/16 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of FieldPoint Petroleum Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ray Reaves, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  _/s/ Ray Reaves_________ Ray Reaves Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer November 8, 2007
Exhibit 10.1


  


 





AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment No. 1 to Employment
Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made as of May 27, 2015, by and between RF Industries, Ltd., a Nevada corporation
(“Employer”), and Johnny Walker (“Executive”), with reference to the following facts:


 


WHEREAS, Employer and Executive are parties
to an Employment Agreement dated as of October 13, 2015 (the “Employment Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, Employer and Executive wish to
amend the Employment Agreement in certain respects as provided in this Amendment.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing and other consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which hereby are acknowledged, Employer and Executive hereby
agree as follows:


 


1.             Employer and Executive hereby agree that Section 4.3 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety
to read as follows:


 


“4.3 On the effective
date of this Agreement, the Corporation shall grant Executive a stock option to purchase one hundred thousand (100,000) shares
of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price equal to the closing price of such stock on the date of grant (the
“Option”). The shares underlying the Option shall vest as follows: (i) 10,000 shares shall be vested as of the effective
date of this Agreement, and (ii) 10,000 shares shall vest on each of the next nine anniversaries of the effective date of this
Agreement, provided that the Executive is still employed with the Corporation on each such date. If a Change in Control transaction
occurs during the Term, then any shares that have not vested under the Option will vest immediately upon the closing of the Change
of Control transaction. To the extent legally permitted, the Option shall be an incentive stock option. The Option shall have a
term of ten (10) years.”


 


2.             No Other Changes to the Employment Agreement. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all of the terms
of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.






 


 



    	1



    	 



    




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have
executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.


 


 


	 	“EMPLOYER”
	 	 
	 	RF Industries, Ltd.
	 	 
	 	 
	 	By:/s/ MARK TURFLER                        
	 	       Mark Turfler
	 	       Chief Financial Officer
	 	 
	 	 
	 	“EXECUTIVE”
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ JOHNNY WALKER                            
	 	Johnny Walker
	 	 


 


 






    	2
#### James Price, an incompetent, by his guardian v. Peter Price, Franklin Arnold et al.

*Costs mthlield on affirmance.*

Each party may he left to pay his own. costs where a decree of dismissal is affirmed in a doubtful case.

Appeal from Macomb.

Submitted January 20.

Decided April 27.

Bill of foreclosure.

Dismissal of bill affirmed.

*D. N. Lowell*and *A. B. Maynard*for complainant.

*Crocker & Hutchins*for defendant Arnold.

Graves, J.

Tbe court is not satisfied that any case is made for relief in this cause and the decree below dismissing the bill is therefore affirmed, and under the circumstances, each party will be left to pay his own costs.

The other Justices concurred.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of California CoastalCommunities, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in their respective capacity as anofficer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best oftheir respective knowledge, that:

 

·                  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

·                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: August 16, 2010                         |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |   |
| /s/  Raymond J. Pacini                             |   |
| Raymond  J. Pacini                                 |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer                           |   |
|                                               |   |
| /s/  Sandra G. Sciutto                             |   |
| Sandra  G. Sciutto                                 |   |
| Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
United States Department of Com

National Institute of Standards and Technolo

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For: 

Wyoming 

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international 

system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, andhas demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate. 

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope 

Mass Echelon III Volume Transfer, II

5 kg to 1 g 1000 gal to 5 gal 3000 lb to 0.001 lb 8 oz to 0.03125 oz Volume Transfer, II LPG

100 gal 

Weight Carts 25 gal __________

5000 lb to 2000 lb Katrice Lipp

NIST Office 

Effective Dat

(Rev.: September 2021)
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 75189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29556]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


President's Commission on White House Fellowships Advisory 
Committee: Closed Meeting

AGENCY: President's Commission on White House Fellowships, U.S. Office 
of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The President's Commission on White House Fellowships (PCWHF) 
was established by an Executive Order in 1964. The PCWHF is an advisory 
committee composed of Special Government Employees appointed by the 
President. The Advisory Committee will meet in June to interview 
potential candidates for recommendation to become a White House Fellow.
    The meeting is closed.
    Name of Committee: President's Commission on White House 
Fellowships Mid-Year Meeting.
    Date: January 26, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m.
    Place: TBD.
    Agenda: The Commission will talk to current Fellows on how their 
placements are going and discuss progress on strategic goals and 
recruiting efforts.
    Location: TBD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Y. Kaplan, 712 Jackson Place 
NW., Washington, DC 20503, and Phone: 202-395-4522.

    President's Commission on White House Fellowships.
Jennifer Y. Kaplan,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2014-29556 Filed 12-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-44-P
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global Diversified Industries, Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Phil
Hamilton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                               /S/ PHIL HAMILTON
                                               -----------------
                                                 Phil Hamilton

Chief Executive Officer
August 16, 2004
#### Robert Smith v. Abner Hubbard.

*Awan'd of costs in appeal cases not reviewed.*

The discretion of a circuit judge in awarding costs in appeal cases is not reviewable by the Supreme Court.

Error to Saginaw.

Submitted June 15.

Decided June 22.

*307Assumpsit. Plaintiff recovered judgment before a justice for $40.29 damages and $10 costs; on an appeal taken by tbe defendant he again obtained a verdict and bis damages were assessed at $50, but defendant was given costs. Plaintiff brings error.

Affirmed.

*F. L. Eaton*for plaintiff in error.

Tbe successful party in a suit at law should recover costs: Bouv. Law Dict. *Costs;*Statute of Gloucester, A. D. 1278; 3 Terr. Laws, 1158; Rev. Stat. 1846, cb. 149, § 3; Comp. L. 1871, §§ 5375, 5459, 7387, 7427; costs on motions -are allowed to tbe prevailing party as a matter of course unless some special reason is shown: *O'Flynn v. Eagle*7 Mich. 306 ; *Ireland v. Spalding*11 Mich. 455; an unjust award may be reviewed: *Knox v. Arnold*1 Wis. 71; *Heeron v. Beckwith,*id. 17; *Bean v. Moore*2 Chand. (Wis.) 44; *Benaway v. Coyne*3 Ohand. 214; *Rich v. Hathaway*18 Ill. 548 ; *Gallagher v. People*91 Ill. 590; *Andrews v. Campbell*94 Ill. 579; *Schroer v. Wessell*89 Ill. 113; *Mitchell v. Shuert*16 Mich. 444; *Yamkey v. Richardson*9 Mich. 529.

*Wm. II. Sweet*for defendant in error.

Tbe power of tbe circuit court to award costs on appeal is discretionary and not open to review: *Holbrook v. Cook*5 Mich. 225 ; *Chaffee v. Soldan*id. 242; *Van Renselaer v. Whiting*12 Mich. 449 ; *Beaubien v. Cicotte*id. 485; *Johr v. People*26 Mich. 427; *Polhemus v. Ann Arbor*27 Mich. 44; discretion is presumed to have been properly exercised: *Somerville v. Richards*37 Mich. 302.

Marston, C. J.

While we are of opinion that costs should have been awarded tbe plaintiff in error in this case, and can conceive of no reason for tbe same not having been given, let alone giving of costs against him as was done, yet within tbe rule in *Hewitt v. Ingham Circuit Judge*44 Mich. 153, we cannot review tbe discretion of tbe circuit judge even although we may think no discretion was exercised.

Tbe judgment will be affirmed with costs.

Tbe other Justices concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                             398
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,540
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,510)
<INVENTORY>                                        348
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,719
<PP&E>                                           5,043
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,327)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,502
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,579
<COMMON>                                         7,873
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,276)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,180
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,001
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (866)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,805)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,146)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,849)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,248)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,394)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed August 20, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-20-00545-CV

IN RE CHRISTOPHER DUPUY, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-89958

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 4, 2020, relator Christopher Dupuy filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 

52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Daryl Moore, 

presiding judge of the 333rd District Court of Harris County, to: (1) vacate his 

February 24, 2020 order denying relator’s motion for default judgment and his 

June 20, 2020 order denying relator’s motion to compel responses to discovery 

requests, and (2) to grant these motions.
2

We dismiss relator’s petition without prejudice to refiling because relator’s 

petition and appendix do not show that relator has complied with the requirements 

of Rule 52.7 and Rule 52.3(k) and (j) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Spain, Hassan, and Poissant.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed December 13, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-0192

Lower Tribunal No. F04-31230

________________

Leon Jackson,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mavel Ruiz, Judge.

Leon Jackson, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kayla Heather McNab, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, HENDON, and MILLER, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1865 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Sergeant 

at Arms and Doorkeeper Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper Expenses for 

fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 SENATE, SERGEANT AT ARMS AND DOOR5 KEEPER EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:37 Apr 13, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1865.IH H1865

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1865 IH

1 able for Senate, Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper Ex2 penses for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $126,595,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.2

In connection with the Annual Report of Global Diversified Industries
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Adam Debard, Treasurer, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The Information contained in the Report fairly represents,
in all material aspects, the financial condition and result of
operations on the Company.


By: /s/Adam Debard
Adam Debard, Treasurer