alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        11,344,700
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      55,900
<MORTGAGE>                                   2,289,200
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   16,600
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              14,677,800
<CASH>                                          16,700
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             601,800
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       1,556,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,860,600
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             13,656,100
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 604,300
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          436,200
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                829,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          242,700
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           900
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,976,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,860,600
<PREMIUMS>                                     301,900
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            285,600
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               (800)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 213,900
<BENEFITS>                                     413,600
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     43,000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           184,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                121,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    43,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             74,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    74,100
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.82
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
#### Newman *v.*The Indianapolis and St. Louis R. R. Co.

APPEAL from the Hendricks Circuit Court.

*W. A. McKenzie, C. C. Nave, and-Nave,*for appellant.

*M. A. Osborn,*for appelleé.

Worden, J.

This case involves the same questions that were decided in the case of *Straughan*v. *The Indianapolis and St. Louis R. R. Co.,*38 Ind. 185, and must be affirmed for the reasons therein given.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs and five per cent, damages.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**Pursuant      to**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As      Adopted pursuant to**

**Section      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| Date:                June 13, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Zeynep Hakimoglu                                                              |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |   | Zeynep                Hakimoglu                                                                  |
|                               |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal                Executive Officer) |

**A      signed original of the written statement above required by Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to ClearOne Communications, Inc.      and will be retained by ClearOne Communications, Inc. and furnished to the      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon      request.**
No. D-706.

#### In re Disbarment of Purvis.

It is ordered that Charles M. Purvis, of Birmingham, Ala., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-93,573-01

EX P ARTE KEVIN JONES, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W401-80295-2018-HC IN THE 401 DISTRICT COURT ST F ROM COLLIN COUNTY

Per curiam . K

E L L E R , P .J., and S L A U G H T E R , J., dissented.

O P I N I O N Applicant was char g ed with one count of continuous sexual abuse of a y oung child and one count of indece ncy with a child by contac t. He was acquitted of continuous sexual abuse , b u t convicted of one count of indece ncy with a child by contac t and sentenc ed to four y ear s’ imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appea ls aff ir m ed h i s conviction. Jones v. State , No. 05-19- 01120-CR (Tex. App. — Dallas J une 11, 2020) (not desig nated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to thi s Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffe ctive beca use counsel failed to reque st a unanimity instruction in the jury char g e. The State prese nted evidenc e of multipl e2

incidents that could have been used to prove indece ncy with a child by contac t. Howeve r, the char g e in this case did not include an instruction to tell the jurors that they must be unanimous as to which incident they believed occur red bey ond a rea sonable doubt. The trial court conducte d a live habea s hear ing and hear d testimony and arg uments. Ba sed on the rec ord, the trial court has deter mined that trial counsel’ s perf

ormanc e wa s deficie nt and that Applicant wa s prejudice d. Relief is g rante d. Strickland v. W ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984). The judgment i n cause number 401-80295-2018 in the 401st District Court of Colli n County is set aside, and Applicant is

rema nded to the custody of the Sheriff of Colli n County to an s we r the char g es as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any nece ssary bench war rant within ten day s from the date of this Court’s mandate. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment o f Cr im in a l Ju s ti c e

– Co r rec tional I nstitut ions Division and the Boa rd of Par dons and Paroles.

Deliver ed: Dec ember

7, 2022 Do not publish
II 

Calendar No. 333 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1727 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2024 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act 

to extend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chesapeake and Ohio 

5 Canal National Historical Park Commission Extension 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO CANAL NATIONAL HISTOR8 ICAL PARK COMMISSION. 

9 Section 6(g) of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal De10 velopment Act (16 U.S.C. 410y–4(g)) is amended by strikVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:03 Feb 08, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1727.PCS H1727

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 1727 PCS

1 ing ‘‘40’’ and all that follows through the period at the 

2 end and inserting ‘‘on October 1, 2031.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 6, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Calendar No. 333 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1727 

AN ACT 

To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal DevelopCanal National Historical Park Commission. ment Act to extend the Chesapeake and Ohio 

FEBRUARY 7, 2024 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      14,926,841
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,926,841
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,091,028
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     835,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,926,841
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,919,556
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,968,652
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (13,102,966)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             288,157
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,765,713
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         12,765,713
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,765,713
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   248.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   248.62
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 21.1**

 
| **Gaiam Subsidiaries**          | ** ** | **State or Country of Incorporation or Registration** |
|---------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Gaiam  Americas, Inc.           |       |                                                  | State of Colorado |
| Gaiam.com,  Inc.                |       |                                                  | State of Colorado |
| Gaiam  Direct, Inc.             |       |                                                  | State of Colorado |
| Gaiam  Energy Tech, Inc.        |       |                                                  | State of Colorado |
| Gaiam  International, Inc.      |       |                                                  | State of Colorado |
| Gaiam  International II, Inc.   |       |                                                  | State of Colorado |
| Gaiam  International III, Inc.  |       |                                                  | State of Colorado |
| Gaiam  Media, Inc.              |       |                                                  | State of Colorado |
| Gaiam  Shared Services, Inc.    |       |                                                  | State of Colorado |
| Gaiam  Travel, Inc.             |       |                                                  | State of Colorado |
| Gaiam  West, Inc.               |       |                                                  | State of California |
| Real  Goods Trading Corporation |       |                                                  | State of California |
| Gaiam  International C.V.       |       |                                                  | The Netherlands |
| Gaiam  International B.V.       |       |                                                  | The Netherlands |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Peter R. Huntsman, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Huntsman International LLC for the year ended December 31,
2003;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of and for the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
November 23, 2004

| |  | /s/PETER R. HUNTSMANPeter R. Huntsman Chief Executive
Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 179 

To promote accountability and transparency in future executive orders. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. MANN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To promote accountability and transparency in future 

executive orders. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NOTIFICATION RESPECTING CERTAIN EXECU4 TIVE ORDERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days before 

6 issuing a qualifying executive order, the President shall 

7 transmit to the Congress, and make publicly available, a 

8 notification with respect to such executive order. Such no9 tification shall contain— 

10 (1) the text of the executive order; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 179 IH

1 (2) the Federal law or laws affected by the ex2 ecutive order that is the subject of the notification; 

3 (3) how the President is working within the pa4 rameters specified in Federal law and the Constitu5 tion; 

6 (4) the means by which the executive order will 

7 be accomplished, including through any related Fed8 eral agencies or departments; and 

9 (5) a comprehensive list of organizations, busi10 nesses, and other parties or entities the President, 

11 or the President’s designee, engaged with prior to 

12 the issuance of such executive order. 

13 (b) REPORTS.—Not later than 6 months after the 

14 date of the enactment of this Act, and every 12 months 

15 thereafter, the President shall submit to the Congress a 

16 report on the outcome of each qualifying executive order 

17 issued during the period covered by the report. 

18 (c) QUALIFYING EXECUTIVE ORDER.—The term 

19 ‘‘qualifying executive order’’ means any executive order 

20 (including an executive order that revokes or nullifies a 

21 previous executive order) issued after the date of the en22 actment of this Act that relates to agriculture, food, and 

23 the livelihood of farmers, ranchers, and producers in the 

24 United States. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: APPOINTMENT TO THE APPELLATE COURT PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE : : : : : No 264 APPELLATE COURT RULES DOCKET

**ORDER PER CURIA** **M AN**  **D NOW**  , this 1 1 th day of August , 2016, James L. McMonagle, Jr., Esquire, Luzerne County, is hereby appointed as a member of t he A ppellate Court Procedural Rules Committee for a term of three years.
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Subsidiariesof Cherokee International Corporation**

| **Subsidiary Name**                        | ** ** | ** **     | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------|----------------|------------|---------------------------------------------|------------|
| Cherokee  Electronica S.A. de C.V.              |       | Mexico         |       |
| Cherokee Europe SCA                             |       | Belgium        |       |
| Cherokee Europe SPRL                            |       | Belgium        |       |
| Cherokee Germany GmbH                           |       | Germany        |       |
| Cherokee India Pvt. Ltd.                        |       | India          |       |
| Cherokee International (China) Power Supply LLC |       | China          |       |
| Cherokee Netherlands B.V.                       |       | Netherlands    |       |
| Cherokee Netherlands I B.V.                     |       | Netherlands    |       |
| Cherokee Netherlands II B.V.                    |       | Netherlands    |       |
| Cherokee Sarl                                   |       | France         |       |
| Cherokee AB                                     |       | Sweden         |       |
| Cherokee U.K.                                   |       | United Kingdom |       |
| Powertel India  Pvt. Ltd.                       |       | India          |       |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2616

DONALD R. TERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DIRECTOR, COMPLAINT ADJUDICATION DIVISION, U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-98-222) Submitted: January 26, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald R. Terry, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Anson Rhine, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia; Lisa J. Banks, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Donald R. Terry appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Terry v. Director, Complaint Adjudication Div. , No. CA-98-222 (E.D. Va. Sept. 28, 1998). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 12.2
 Doral Financial Corporation
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
 For the nine month period endedSeptember
30, 2009Including Interest on DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax loss from continuing operations
    
    $
    (44,482
    )Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    224,394Total Earnings
    
    $
    179,912Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    222,566Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    140An estimate of the interest component within rental expense
    
    
    1,688Total Fixed Charges before preferred dividends
    
    
    224,394Preferred dividends accrued
    
    
    14,595Ratio of pre tax loss to net loss
    
    
    1,789Preferred dividend factor
    
    
    26,110Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    250,504Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
    
    
    (A
    )Excluding Interest on DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax loss from continuing operations
    
    $
    (44,482
    )Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    126,700Total Earnings
    
    $
    82,218Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    124,872Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    140An estimate of the interest component within rental expense
    
    
    1,688Total Fixed Charges before preferred dividends
    
    
    126,700Preferred dividends accrued
    
    
    14,595Ratio of pre tax loss to net loss
    
    
    1.789Preferred dividend factor
    
    
    26,110Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    152,810Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
    
    
    (A
    )
 
 (A)
    
    Due to the Companys pre-tax loss for the nine month
period  ended September 30, 2009 the ratio
coverage was less than 1:1. The Company would have to generate additional earnings of $70.6 million
to achieve a ratio of 1:1 for the nine month period  ended
September 30, 2009.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor Manuel BENITEZ-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-50233.

D.C. No. CR-99-00206-BTM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2001.*

Decided June 1, 2001.

*595Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner Victor Manuel Benitez-Chavez appeals the seventy-seven month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of being found in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Benitez-Chavez contends the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment. We reject this contention because Benitez-Chavez’s unconditional guilty plea waived all pre-plea nonjurisdictional rulings and antecedent constitutional violations. *See United States v. Floyd,*108 F.3d 202, 203-04 (9th Cir.1997).

Benitez-Chavez also contends the district court erred by denying him a downward departure for overrepresentation of his criminal history. The district court’s discretionary decision not to depart downward from the sentencing guidelines is not reviewable on appeal. *See United States v. Lipman,*133 F.3d 726, 729 (9th Cir.1998).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.