alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Filed 10/29/13 In re U.M. CA1/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re U.M., a Person Coming Under the 

Juvenile Court Law.

U.M.,

Petitioner,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF 

ALAMEDA,

Respondent;

THE PEOPLE,

Real Party in Interest.

 A138813

 (Alameda County

 Super. Ct. No. SJ10014653)

Respondent court declared U.M. a ward because of his habitual truancy (Welf. & 

Inst. Code, § 601, subd. (b)). Matters did not improve, and on Friday, April 19, 2013, the 

court ordered the ward “remanded . . . to do an in-custody WETA [Weekend Training 

Academy]” for the weekend about to commence. On May 31, 2013, the ward filed this 

petition for an extraordinary writ “directing and prohibiting respondent court from 

conducting any further proceedings with respect to this matter.” The basis for the 

petition was that respondent court could not remand him for contempt unless it complied 

the procedures specified in the Code of Civil Procedure.

During the pendency of this matter, an authoritative answer to the substantive 

issued was issued by Division Three of this District. Respondent court is now aware that 
2

the civil contempt procedures are to be followed. (In re M.R. (2013) 

220 Cal.App.4th 49.) However, the “matter” of the petition, the order for the weekend 

remand in April, is long past. Thus “it is impossible for this court to afford . . . relief.” 

(Id. at p. 56.) Because the matter is obviously moot at this time, the appropriate response 

is to deny the petition. (Gridley v. Gridley (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 1562, 1588; In re 

Jessica K. (2000) 79 Cal.App.4th 1313, 1315 -1316; 8 Witkin, Cal. Procedure 

(5th ed. 2008) Extraordinary Writs, § 148, p. 1047.)

The order to show cause heretofore issued is discharged as improvidently granted. 

The petition is denied.

_________________________

Richman, J.

We concur:

_________________________

Kline, P.J.

_________________________

Brick, J.*

 

*

Judge of the Alameda County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to 

article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1852 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1852

   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, 
              Conference Committees for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, 
              Conference Committees for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR SENATE, CONFERENCE 
              COMMITTEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Senate, Conference 
Committees for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $3,408,000.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Diversified Futures Fund II L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       9,008,090
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,254<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,424,888<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,424,888<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (202,006)<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               475,701
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (677,707)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (677,707)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (677,707)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $28,254.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $388,544.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $363,068 and accrued
management fees of $23,562.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $(557,135),
net change in unrealized of $181,980, and interest income of
$173,149.
</FN>


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOE HENRY SCOTT, III, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0730-KD-C

JERRY FERRELL, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to

the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is

ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby

dismissed without prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED this May 10, 2010.

s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00730-KD-C Document 13 Filed 05/11/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.1


 





AMENDMENT TO THE


AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


 


This Amendment (“Amendment”)
is entered into as of the 27th day of May 2015, by and between Home Bancorp, Inc. (the “Corporation”) and
John W. Bordelon (the “Executive”).


 


WITNESSETH


 


WHEREAS, the
Corporation and the Executive previously entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2011
(the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the
parties desire to amend the Agreement in order to extend its term, as provided in Section 2(b) thereof.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:


 


1.     The
last sentence in Section 2(a) of the Agreement is amended and restated to read as follows: “The terms and conditions of this
Agreement shall be and remain in effect during the period beginning on the Effective Date of this Agreement and ending on June
22, 2018, plus such extensions, if any, as are provided pursuant to Section 2(b) hereof (the “Employment Period”).”


 


2.     Except
to the extent expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue unmodified and shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Amendment has been duly executed by the parties hereto as of the day and year first written above.


 





	 	HOME BANCORP, INC.
	 	 
	 	 
	 	By:   /s/ Michael P. Maraist
	 	Michael P. Maraist
	 	Chairman of the Board
	 	 
	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ John W. Bordelon
	 	John W. Bordelon
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         330,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,968,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   530,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,310,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,027,000
<PP&E>                                       5,657,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,491,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,946,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,675,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,000,000
<COMMON>                                    14,915,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (16,843,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,946,000
<SALES>                                      6,254,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,254,000
<CGS>                                      (4,543,000)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (7,095,000)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               410,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             113,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (954,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (954,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (954,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,045,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          111,897
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     933,103
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,045,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (68,799)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 68,799
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             68,799
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    68,799
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                           168,934
<SECURITIES>                                      54,171
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,573,542
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,927,244
<PP&E>                                           319,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                   241,364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,890,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,578,328
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                        5,000
<COMMON>                                           9,062
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,297,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,890,246
<SALES>                                          171,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 171,749
<CGS>                                            163,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    171,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                25,753
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  893,773
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              893,773
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     893,773
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.06


        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

AM/NS CALVERT LLC, etc., )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION 14-0310-WS-B

 )

PSL, LTD., )

 )

Defendant. )

ORDER

The plaintiff has filed an application for entry of default. (Doc. 11). 

“When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed 

to plead or otherwise defend,” it is subject to entry of default. Fed. R. Civ. P. 

55(a). But a defendant is under no obligation to plead or otherwise defend until 

and unless it is “served with the summons and complaint.” Id. Rule 

12(a)(1)(A)(i); accord Securities and Exchange Commission v. Wright, 261 Fed. 

Appx. 259, 261 (11th Cir. 2008). Thus, “[b]efore a default can be entered, ... the 

party must have been effectively served with process.” 10 Charles Alan Wright & 

Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure § 2682 at 14 (3rd ed. 1998). And 

when service of process is at issue, “it [i]s proper for the court rather than the clerk 

to consider [the plaintiff’s] request” for entry of default. Sandoval v. Bluegrass 

Regional Mental Health – Mental Retardation Board, 2000 WL 1257040 at *5 

(6th Cir. 2000). 

The defendant is an Indian corporation with its principal place of business 

in Mumbai. (Doc. 1, ¶ 3). The plaintiff attempted service pursuant to the Hague 

Convention. (Doc. 7). This is a relatively complex form of service, and the Court 

cannot determine from the plaintiff’s one-sentence treatment of the issue, (Doc. 

Case 1:14-cv-00310-WS-B Document 12 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 2
2

11-1, ¶ 3), that its requirements have been met.1 Accordingly, the application for 

entry of default, construed as a motion for such relief, is denied without prejudice 

to the plaintiff’s ability to file a properly supported motion.

DONE and ORDERED this 2nd day of February, 2015.

s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 1 The plaintiff neither identifies the requirements of service under the Hague 

Convention nor explains how the documents to which it cites, (Doc. 8), establish that 

those requirements have been satisfied.

Case 1:14-cv-00310-WS-B Document 12 Filed 02/02/15 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 244 (Friday, December 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75785-75786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29748]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD

Meetings

AGENCY: Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board 
(Access Board) plans to hold its regular committee and Board meetings 
in Washington, DC, Monday through Wednesday, January 12-14, 2015 at the 
times and location listed below.

[[Page 75786]]

DATES: The schedule of events is as follows:

Monday, January 12, 2015

10:00-Noon Ad Hoc Committee Meetings: Closed to public
1:30-5:00 p.m. Roundtable Discussion on Hearing Access

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

9:30-11:00 a.m. Frontier Issues Ad Hoc Committee
11:00-Noon Ad Hoc Committees: Closed to public
1:30-2:00 p.m. Budget Committee
2:00-3:00 Planning and Evaluation Committee
3:00-4:00 Technical Programs Committee

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

1:30-3:00 p.m. Board Meeting

ADDRESSES: Meetings will be held at the Access Board Conference Room, 
1331 F Street NW., Suite 800, Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information regarding the 
meetings, please contact David Capozzi, Executive Director, (202) 272-
0010 (voice); (202) 272-0054 (TTY).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At the Board meeting scheduled on the 
afternoon of Wednesday, January 14, 2015, the Access Board will 
consider the following agenda items:

 Approval of the draft November 19, 2014 meeting minutes (vote)
 Ad Hoc Committee Reports: Design Guidance; Frontier Issues; 
Information and Communications Technologies; Medical Diagnostic 
Equipment; Passenger Vessels; Public Rights-of-Way and Shared Use 
Paths; Self-Service Transaction Machines; and Transportation Vehicles
 Budget Committee
 Technical Programs Committee
 Planning and Evaluation Committee
 Election Assistance Commission Report
 Executive Director's Report

    All meetings are accessible to persons with disabilities. An 
assistive listening system, Communication Access Realtime Translation 
(CART), and sign language interpreters will be available at the Board 
meeting and committee meetings. Persons attending Board meetings are 
requested to refrain from using perfume, cologne, and other fragrances 
for the comfort of other participants (see www.access-board.gov/the-board/policies/fragrance-free-environment for more information).

David M. Capozzi,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2014-29748 Filed 12-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8150-01-P
```
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant
to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Zeynep
Hakimoglu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
ClearOne Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September
30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of ClearOne Communications,
Inc.











Date:  November
      11, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Zeynep HakimogluZeynep
      HakimogluChairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)


































A
signed original of the written statement above required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to ClearOne Communications, Inc.
and will be retained by ClearOne Communications, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### C. P. Clemmons *v.*Jesse Moore.

Trusts — Established by Parol.

To establish a parol trust the facts constituting such a trust must be specifically and clearly set forth in the petition and if denied must be proved certainly.

APPEAL PROM MUHLENBURG- CIRCUIT COURT.

January 12, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

To establish a parol trust, the facts constituting such a trust should be specifically • and clearly set forth in the petition, and if denied *293should be proved with great certainty. In this case the evidence is very conflicting; and if it does not preponderate against the appellant, it falls far short of the clearness and certainty which in such cases is required to authorize judicial action.

*James Ricketts, for appellant.*

*J. C. Thompson, for appellee.*

Several business transactions transpired between these parties after the alleged agreement to hold the land by Moore for Clemmons, in some of which writings were executed. In one, appellant executed to appellee a mortgage on a crop of tobacco; and still the alleged agreement to permit appellee to redeem the land, the most important of all, was left in parol.

The legal title to the land was in appellant, Clemmons, or if not it was held by Gilliam, and it was subject to levy and sale under the execution. Indeed that is not questioned by the pleadings.

We have been unable to discover upon what principle appellant can be relieved.

Wherefore the judgment be *affirmed.*