alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
 THE MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906
 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Monarch Cement Company and will be retained by The Monarch Cement Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 Dated:  March 16, 2011
 
 /s/ Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
 Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
 President and
 Chairman of the Board
 (principal executive officer)
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 243 (Thursday, December 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 75553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29728]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Sunshine Act Meeting


Notice of a Matter To Be Deferred From the Agenda for 
Consideration at an Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the following matter 
will be deferred from the ``Discussion Agenda'' at the open meeting of 
the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 
scheduled to be held at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, December 16, 2014, in 
the Board Room on the fourth floor of the FDIC Building located at 
550--17th Street NW., Washington, DC.:

    Memorandum and resolution re: Regulatory Capital Rules, 
Liquidity Coverage Ratio, Proposed Revisions to the Definition of 
Qualifying Master Netting Agreement and Related Definitions.

    Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be 
directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the 
Corporation, at (202) 898-7043.

    Dated: December 15, 2014.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29728 Filed 12-16-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Exhibit 23

	Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus 
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 No. 33-56739, to 
the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus constituting part of the 
Registration Statement on Form S-3 No. 33-58403, to the incorporation by 
reference in the Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on 
Form S-3 No. 33-43655, to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus 
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 33-64576, to 
the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus constituting part of the 
Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 33-24952, to the incorporation by 
reference in the Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on 
Form S-8 No. 33-28096, to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus 
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 No. 33-32275 and to 
the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus constituting part of the 
Registration Statement on Form S-3 No. 33-55816 of our report dated February 9, 
1996 appearing on page 53 of The Montana Power Company's Annual Report on 
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.  



/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP




Portland, Oregon
March 22, 1996
#### Sarah M. Monroe v. Theodore Auguste Heintzman, John D. Standish and Charles H. Freeman.

*Costs on eertiora/ri seeu/red by bond in replevin.*

A replevin bond covers tLe costs of all courts even tLougL the case be removed on *certiara/i'i*from before a justice, if a final judgment on writ of error awards all costs below.

Error to'Wayne.

Submitted April 6.

Decided April 13.

Debt on bond. Sarah M. Monroe was assignee of a replevin bond to Jane Sterling, upon which Standish *&*Freeman were sureties for Heintzman, the plaintiff in replevin. The suit began before a justice, and was taken on *13*certiorari*to the circuit from which it was removed on writ of error to the Supreme Court, where the defendant prevailed, and the judgments below, both of which had been in favor of the plaintiff, were reversed, *with costs of all the courts: Stirling v. Heintzman*42 Mich. 449. The assignee of the bond recites these facts in her declaration, and claims to be entitled to recover the costs adjudged against Heintzman. Defendant Standish demurred to the declaration on the ground, among others, that he was not liable for costs of the Supreme or circuit court. The case was heard on demurrer, and judgment given thereon for the defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

Reversed.

*James H. Pound*for plaintiff in error.

*Certiorari*proceedings are not a new suit: *Fisher v. Thirkell*21 Mich. 1; *Dunn v. Sutliff*1 Mich. 24; *Smith v. Crouse*24 Barb. 436; *Bennet v. Rathbun*17 Johns. 37; *Volk v. Youngs*1 Cow. 425; *Brabon v. Pierce*34 Mich. 39; *Bennett v. Brown*20 N. Y. 102; *Robinson v. Plimpton*25 N. Y. 484.

*Moore, Canfield & Warner*for defendant in error.

Distinction is made between an appeal and proceedings on *certiorari: Fenno v. Dickinson*4 Den. 84; sureties on a replevin bond are not liable for costs of the Supreme Court on error: *Clark v. Quackenboss*28 Ill. 112; *Hinckley v. Kreitz*58 N. Y. 583; *Babbitt v. Finn*101 U. S. 7.

Graves, J.

This is a writ of error brought to reverse a judgment given for the defendant on demurrer to the declaration. The case is governed by *McLean v. Isbell*44 Mich. 129.

The judgment is reversed and the demurrer overruled with costs. The cause must be remanded for further proceedings, and my brethren are of opinion that the court' below may in its discretion permit the defendant in error to plead over.

The other Justices concurred.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11



                         BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION
              COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<S>                                                       <C>         <C>
                                                                Year Ended
                                                           12/31/1999   12/31/1998
                                                           ----------   ----------
Earnings:

        Earnings before income tax expense                     4,373       13,429
        Add:
        Interest on advances and other borrowings             33,599       27,871
        Interest component of rental expense                     894          469
                                                            ---------------------
        Earnings before fixed charges excluding
          interest on customer deposits                       38,866       41,769
        Interest on customer deposits                         39,908       33,602
                                                            ---------------------
        Earnings before fixed charges                         78,774       75,371
                                                            =====================

Fixed Charges:
        Interest on advances and other borrowings             33,599       27,871
        Interest component of rental expense                     894          469
                                                            ---------------------
        Fixed charges excluding interest on
          customer deposits                                   34,493       28,340
        Interest on customer deposits                         39,908       33,602
                                                            ---------------------
        Total fixed charges                                   74,401       61,942
                                                            =====================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges including
  interest on customer deposits                                 1.06         1.22

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges excluding interest
  on customer deposits                                          1.13         1.47

Total rent expense                                             4,470        2,346
Interest component (assumed at 20% - from D & T)                 894          469
</TABLE>
Public Safety Broadband 

Stakeholder Meeting

INFOGRAPHIC

HIGHLIGHTS HIGHLIGHTS

Plenary 

Sessions

Meeting 

Attendees

Fireside 

Chats

Q&A 

Sessions

Breakout 

Sessions

Panel 

Discussions

Technology 

Demonstrations

Campfire 

Sessions

Poster 

Sessions

On-Demand 

Session Videos

NEW THIS YEAR NEW THIS YEAR

Wildland Urban Interface 

Conference Track

20 Breakout Sessions 

Held Outdoors

Campfire-style 

Breakout Sessions

ATTENDEE BREAKDOWN ATTENDEE BREAKDOWN

0 30 60 90 120 150

Other (Non-Profit Companies and Research Labs)

Public Safety/State/Local Government

Academia

Federal Government

41.09% Industry

27.19%

15.41%

14.80%

1.51%

PSCR.gov #PSCR2022
AVERAGE ATTENDEE SATISFACTION RATINGS

Overall

Satisfaction

w/ PSCR 2022

4.57

(out of 5)

Attendee Satisfaction by 

Component

PLENARY 

SESSIONS

4.42

(out of 5)

BREAKOUT 

SESSIONS

4.22

(out of 5)

TECHNOLOGY 

DEMONSTRATIONS

4.44

(out of 5)

MOBILE APP

Average 4.5 Satisfaction

(out of 5)

361

Downloads

13.3k

Total

Interactions

210

Hours

Open
ON-DEMAND SESSIONS

Average 

Satisfaction

4.27

(out of 5)

On-Demand sessions were available 

to watch three weeks before the 

conference started

New this 

year: 

On-Demand sessions were available 

to watch three weeks before the 

conference started

New this 

year: 

12

On-Demand 

Registrants

600

Total 

Views

Most Viewed Sessions

XR Training: 

Lessons Learned 

from Working With 

Public Safety

Automated Streams 

Analytics for Public 

Safety (ASAPS) 

Research Resources

Mission Critical Voice 

Quality of Experience: 

Outreach and 

Implementation

BREAKOUT SESSIONS

Average Satisfaction Rating (Out Of 5)

Fireside Chat

4.29

Campfire

4.28

WUI 

4.26

Panel

4.24

Q&A

4.04
WHAT ATTENDEES ARE SAYING

I enjoyed interacting with a range of 

attendees including first responders, 

NIST staff, academics, and companies.

Having sessions where it was an open 

forum for people to talk, present

 ideas, and really connect with each 

other were a really nice addition. I felt

 like I got more out of those sessions 

than I got out of more traditional 

breakouts held in years past.

Add more time for technology 

demonstrations. And stagger demos 

more so that people who are doing 

demos have time to see other demos

Great time to share ideas and 

see what is coming down the 

road for fire safety.

Networking opportunities 

were fantastic. The mobile 

app was likewise remarkable.

I loved the different campfire 

sessions - the variety made it feel like 

a “choose your own adventure” series.

Having material presented in 

on-demand sessions that wasn’t 

available elsewhere throughout 

the week meant that some stuff 

just got missed.

As an innovator, I liked connecting with 

first responders and public safety 

personnel to better understand the 

challenges and needs.

It was difficult to hear the 

conversations in the outdoor 

breakout sessions.

For time-intensive technology 

demonstrations, allow attendees to 

sign up in advance.

TOP WORDS ASSOCIATED WITH PSCR 2022

PSCR.gov #PSCR2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          44,460
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,645
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (20,496)
<INVENTORY>                                      7,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           6,974
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,707)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         53,188
<COMMON>                                            24
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,212
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,306
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,264
<SALES>                                        107,021
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,750
<CGS>                                           88,749
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,489
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,355
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,157
<INCOME-TAX>                                       600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,557
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,557
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                                   CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the annual report of California Service Stations, Inc.
(the  "Company)  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2004,  Jehu
Hand hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
his knowledge:

            (1)   The annual  report fully complies with the  requirements of
                  Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The  information  contained  in the  annual  report  fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Jehu Hand

Jehu Hand
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
November 30, 2004





<PAGE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2023

- 0729

_____________________________
D IEGO D AVID V ALDES , Appellant,

v.

C APITAL L OAN C OMPANY , W ILLIAM J. A BRACZINSKAS , S ANDRA A COSTA , EJS C ONTRACTING , I NC

. a corporation, and U NIVERSAL S URETY OF A MERICA , Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Jackson County

. Ana Maria Garcia
, Judge

. April 30, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R OWE , N ORDBY , and L ONG , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Diego David Valdes, pro se
, Appellant.

H. Matthew Fuqua of Fuqua & Milton, P.A., Marianna
, for Appellee Capital Loan Company

. No appearance by Appellee EJS Contracting.

No appearance by Appellee Universal Surety of Americ a.
No appearance by Appellee William Z. Abraczinskas.

No appearance by Appellee Sandra Acosta.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996             JUN-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996             JUN-30-1995
<CASH>                                          40,800                  61,800
<SECURITIES>                                    28,100                  26,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                  378,100                 368,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (10,300)                (11,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    294,800                 315,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               859,000                 875,700
<PP&E>                                       1,476,600               1,408,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               (766,100)               (711,700)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,629,100               2,652,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          443,500                 476,800
<BONDS>                                        218,500                 218,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       148,400                 148,300
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,524,400               1,515,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,629,100               2,652,000
<SALES>                                      2,215,000               2,099,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,288,200               2,125,900
<CGS>                                        1,517,700               1,424,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,939,000               1,843,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,500                  10,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,400                  28,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                285,300                 243,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                   106,600                  90,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            178,700                 152,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                 155,500                 141,400
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   334,200                 294,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.24                    1.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.24                    1.96
        

</TABLE>
No. 15,984.

#### Blackwell et al. *v.*Pendergast.

*Pleading.*— Action *on Written Instrument.*— Failure *to File Exhibit.*— De*murrer.*— The statute which requires a copy of the original of an instrument of writing upon which a pleading is founded to be filed with the pleading, is imperative; and where the pleading avers that a copy is filed, but no copy is found in the record, the pleading is bad on demurrer.

From the Porter Circuit Court.

*W. E. Pinney,*for appellants.

*P. Crumpacker*and *S. C. Spencer,*for appellee.

*551Filed Nov. 4, 1892.

Miller, J.

— This action was instituted by the appellee against the appellants upon a promissory note and for the foreclosure of a mortgage. The complaint avers that copies of the note and mortgage are made parts of the complaint, but no copy of either instrument appears in the record.

The defendants demurred to the complaint, the demurrer was overruled and excepted to, and this ruling is properly assigned as error in this court.

The statute, section 362, R. S. 1881, which requires a copy, or the original, of an instrument of writing upon which a pleading is founded to be filed with the pleading is imperative, and where a pleading avers that a copy is filed but no copy is found in the record, the pleading will not be good as against a demurrer. *Old*v. *Mohler,*122 Ind. 594; *Overly*v. *Tipton,*68 Ind. 410; *Brown*v. *State, ex rel.,*44 Ind. 222; *Ashley*v. *Foreman,*85 Ind. 55; *Douglass*v. *Keehn,*71 Ind. 97; *Montgomery*v. *Gorrell,*51 Ind. 309; *Seawright*v. *Coffman,*24 Ind. 414.

The court erred in overruling the demurrer to the complaint.

Judgment reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       2,273,519
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,660,773
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    172,225
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,525,559
<PP&E>                                      11,301,743
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,022,344
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,737,631
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,275,154
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        69,751
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,533,901
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,737,631
<SALES>                                     12,310,304
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,310,304
<CGS>                                        8,883,516
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,670,510        
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               180,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             204,662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                255,132
<INCOME-TAX>                                    66,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            189,132
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   189,132
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of BTU International, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 4, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods
covered by the Report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Peter J. TallianPeter J. TallianChief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)


Dated: May 5, 2010