alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         345,656
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  309,644
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,339
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,347,105
<PP&E>                                       6,122,353
<DEPRECIATION>                                 170,321
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,596,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,505,743
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,371
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,389,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,596,470
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               897,570
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  670,878
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               315,840
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              98,561
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (358,030)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (358,030)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (24,054)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (382,084)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5           
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         102,425
<SECURITIES>                                   777
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,202
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          45,984
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          1,100,000
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,998
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,046,780)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,202
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,239
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,713
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,526
<INCOME-TAX>                                   375
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,151
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,151
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 11.0

                             BTU INTERNATIONAL, INC.
         CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                 (in thousands, except share and per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        For the Three Months Ended     For the Nine Months Ended
                                      -----------------------------   ---------------------------
                                        Sept. 29,      Sept. 30,        Sept. 29,     Sept. 30,
                                          2002           2001             2002          2001
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                      <C>             <C>             <C>          <C>
Net loss                                 $(1,661)        $(869)          $(4,427)     $(2,360)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss applicable to
     common stockholders                 $(1,661)        $(869)          $(4,427)     $(2,360)
=================================================================================================

Weighted average number of
  shares outstanding:

     Basic Shares                      6,910,226     6,971,848         6,873,843    6,957,101
     Effect of Dilutive Options                0             0                 0            0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Diluted Shares                    6,910,226     6,971,848         6,873,843    6,957,101
=================================================================================================

Loss per Share

     Basic                                $(0.24)       $(0.13)           $(0.64)      $(0.34)

     Diluted                              $(0.24)       $(0.13)           $(0.64)      $(0.34)
=================================================================================================

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1751 

To amend the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act to include certain 

communities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2023 

Mr. GOSAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act to 

include certain communities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Downwinders Parity 

5 Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCLUSION UNDER THE RADIATION EXPOSURE 

7 COMPENSATION ACT. 

8 Section 4(b)(1) of the Radiation Exposure Com9 pensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note; Public Law 101– 

10 426) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1751 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (B)— 

2 (A) by striking ‘‘that portion of’’; and 

3 (B) by striking ‘‘that consists of townships 

4 13 through 16 at ranges 63 through 71’’; and 

5 (2) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ‘‘all acre6 age in any county all or part of which is located in’’ 

7 before ‘‘that part’’. 

8 SEC. 3. REPORT. 

9 Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 

10 of this Act, the Attorney General shall submit to the rel11 evant committees of the Senate and the House of Rep12 resentatives a report that outlines efforts to educate and 

13 conduct outreach to persons made newly eligible for bene14 fits under the amendments made by section 2. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PATRICK JOSEPH CHAREST,

AIS 182262,

)

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-0067-CG-C

)

BILLY MITCHEM, )

)

Respondent. )

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the Respondents’ Objection to the 

Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 72) timely filed on April 12, 2013. 

The court’s Order adopting the report and recommendation (Doc. 70) and Judgment 

(Doc. 71) are hereby VACATED to allow for consideration of said objection.

DONE and ORDERED this 15th day of April, 2013.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00067-CG-C Document 73 Filed 04/15/13 Page 1 of 1
10584.

#### Ross *v.*Garraux, executor.

Decided January 20, 1921.

Motion for new trial; from city court of Atlanta — Judge Eeid. March 18, 1919.

*Hill & Adams,*for plaintiff.

*James K. Warren, Brewster, Howell*cG *Heyman,*for defendant.

Stephens, J.

This court having held that the trial judge erred in dismissing the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial upon the ground that the movant had not presented for approval a brief of the evidence within the time allowed by law *(Ross*v. *Garraux,*24 *Ga. App.*601, 101 S. E. 700), and the Supreme Court on certiorari having reversed this judgment *(Garraux*v. *Ross,*150 Ga. 645, 104 S. E. 907), the judgment of reversal originally rendered by this court must be vacated, and the judgment of the trial court affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., mid Sill, J., conew.*
<PAGE>   1
                    FIDUCIARY CAPITAL PENSION PARTNERS, L.P.


                        STATEMENTS OF COMPUTATION OF NET
                          INVESTMENT INCOME PER LIMITED
                                PARTNERSHIP UNIT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     For the Three Months             For the Six Months
                                                         Ended June 30,                  Ended June 30,
                                                  --------------------------        -----------------------
                                                       2000          1999             2000          1999
                                                  --------------   ---------        ---------     ---------
<S>                                               <C>                   <C>              <C>           <C>
Net Investment Loss                               $      (62,760)  $ (15,193)       $(125,395)    $ (53,527)

Percentage Allocable to Limited Partners                     100%         98%             100%           93%
                                                  --------------   ---------        ---------     ---------

Net Investment Loss Allocable
   to Limited Partners                            $      (62,760)  $ (14,889)       $(125,395)    $ (49,780)
                                                  ==============   =========        =========     =========

Weighted Average Number of Limited
   Partnership Units Outstanding                         869,796     940,336          869,796       940,336
                                                  ==============   =========        =========     =========

Net Investment Loss Per Limited
   Partnership Unit                               $         (.07)  $    (.01)       $    (.14)    $    (.05)
                                                  ==============   =========        =========     =========
</TABLE>
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT HAR OLD L. AR

M STR ONG, Sr., Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. R . B AR NES, W a rde n, High De se rt State Prison; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-16806 D.C . No. 2:12-c v-02037-LKKC KD M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Lawre nc e K. Ka

rlton, Distric t

Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 20, 2016 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, TASHIM A, a nd NGUYEN, C irc uit Judge s. C a lifornia sta te prisone r Harold L. Arm s trong, Sr., a p pe a ls pro sefrom

the distric t c o urt’ s judgm e nt dismissing his ac tion brought unde r 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a

nd the A m e ric ans with Disa

bilitie s Ac t (“ ADA” ) a lle ging de l ibe rate indiffe re nc e to



# FIL ED JAN 27 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).his se rious m e dic a l ne e ds a n d disa bility disc rim ination. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie wde novo, Re snic k v . Hay e s , 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th C ir. 2000) (dismissa l unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1915A), a nd we a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly dismisse d Arm strong’ s Eighth Ame ndm e nt de libe rat e indiffe re nc e c la im be c a use Arm strong fa ile d to a l le ge fa c ts suffic ie nt to show tha t a ny de fe nda nt disre ga rde d a n e x c e ssive risk to Arm strong’ s he a lth. Se e Toguc hi v . C

hung , 391 F.3d 1051, 1057-58 (9th C ir. 2004) (a prison offic ia l is de libe rat e ly

indiffe re nt only

if he or she knows of a

nd disre ga

rds a n e xc e s sive risk to a n inm ate ’ s he a lth; ne ithe r a prisone r’ s diffe re n c e of opinion c o n c e rning the c ourse of tre atm e nt nor m e re ne glige nc e in tre ating a m e dic a l c ondition a

m ounts to de libe rat e indiffe re nc e ). The distric t c ourt prope rly dismisse d Arm strong’ s c la im tha t prison offic ia ls viola te d the ADA be c a

use Arm strong fa i le d to a lle g e fa c ts suffic ie nt to show tha t prison offic ia ls disc rim inate d a ga inst him be c a use of a disa bility . Se eSimmons v . N av ajo C ty ., Ariz. , 609 F.3d 1011, 1022 (9th C ir. 2010) (“ The ADA prohibits disc rim ination be c a

use of disa

b ility , not ina de q

uate tre atm e nt for disa

bility .” ). The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion in deny ing Arm strong’ s re que s ts for a

ppointm e nt of c ounse l be c a use Arm s trong fa i le d to de m onstra te e xc e ptiona l c irc um sta

nc e s. Se ePalme r v . Valde z , 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th C ir. 1 3 - 1 6 8 0 6 22009) (se tting forth sta nda rd of re v ie w a

nd “ e xc e p tiona l c irc um sta n c e s” re quire m e nt). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 6 8 0 6 3
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 50833 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. JOSE ARNULFO PULIDO

- MENDEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

__________________________________________________________________ Consolidated with No. 19

- 50834 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. JOSE ARNULFO PULIDO

- MENDEZ, also known as Jose Arnulfo P M, also known as Jose Arnulfo Pulido, also known as Jose Pulido

- Mendez, also known as Jose Mendez

- Pulido, also known as Jose Arnulfo Mendez

- Pulido,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:18

- CR

- 242

- 1 USDC No. 4:19

- CR

- 221

- 1 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 8, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-50833 Document: 00515375854 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/08/2020No. 19

- 50833 c/w No. 19

- 50834

2 Before WIENER, COSTA, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Arnulfo Pulido

- Mendez appeals from a judgment revokin g his previously

- imposed supervised release and a judgment of conviction on his guilty plea to illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that the enhancement of his sentence based on his prior conviction pursuant to § 1326(b)(1), which i ncreased the statutory maximum term of imprisonment to 10 years and the statutory maximum term of supervised release to three years for his new illegal reentry offense, is unconstitutional because his prior conviction is treated as a sentencing factor rath er than an element of the offense that must be alleged in the indictment and found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. He concedes that the issue is foreclosed by Almendarez

Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for further review. The Government moves for summary affirmance, urging that Pulido

- Mendez’s argument is foreclosed. The parties are correct that Pulido

- Mendez’s argument is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres

. See United States v. Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 4 97 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Rojas

- Luna , 522 F.3d 502, 505

- 06 (5th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgments of the district court are AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determi ned that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. Case: 19-50833 Document: 00515375854 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/08/2020
**Exhibit21.1**

**Subsidiariesof Cherokee International Corporation**

| **Subsidiary Name**                        | ** ** | ** **     | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------|----------------|------------|---------------------------------------------|------------|
| Cherokee  Electronica S.A. de C.V.              |       | Mexico         |       |
| Cherokee Europe SCA                             |       | Belgium        |       |
| Cherokee Europe SPRL                            |       | Belgium        |       |
| Cherokee Germany GmbH                           |       | Germany        |       |
| Cherokee India Pvt. Ltd.                        |       | India          |       |
| Cherokee International (China) Power Supply LLC |       | China          |       |
| Cherokee Netherlands B.V.                       |       | Netherlands    |       |
| Cherokee Netherlands I B.V.                     |       | Netherlands    |       |
| Cherokee Netherlands II B.V.                    |       | Netherlands    |       |
| Cherokee Sarl                                   |       | France         |       |
| Cherokee AB                                     |       | Sweden         |       |
| Cherokee U.K.                                   |       | United Kingdom |       |
| Powertel India  Pvt. Ltd.                       |       | India          |       |

 

----
a51104051ex10_1.htm



EXHIBIT 10.1







Fiscal Year 2016 Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards





(Restricted Stock Performance-Based Vesting)


 




 




	
Named


Executive Officer

	
Restricted Stock* 


(Performance-Based Vesting) 


(#)

	
Restricted Stock* 


(Performance-Based Vesting TSR) 


(#)


	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
Michael R. Benkel

	  	  
	
Executive Vice President,


Planning and Allocations

	
27,292

	
5,460


	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
Laura A. Coffey

	  	  
	
Executive Vice President,


Interim Chief Financial Officer

	
17,246

	
3,452


	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
Catherine David

	  	  
	
Executive Vice President, 


Merchandising

	
34,116

	
6,824


	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
Sharon M. Leite

	  	  
	
Executive Vice President, 


Sales and Customer Experience

	
32,220

	
6,446


	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 
*These equity awards were granted under the Pier 1 Imports, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, restated as amended through March 25, 2011. The respective forms of award agreements are attached as Exhibits 10.2 and 10.3. The grants were effective May 11, 2015.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 11.0

                            BTU INTERNATIONAL , INC.
        CALCULATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
             (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                       -------------------------------
                                                                         March 31,        April 1,
                                                                           2002             2001
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                                      <C>                   <C>
Net (loss) income                                                        $(1,300)              $77

Net income applicable to
  common stockholders                                                   $(1,300)               $77
                                                                        ========               ===
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
   Basic Shares                                                        6,840,693         6,938,860

   Effect of Dilutive Options                                                  0           312,013
                                                                               -           -------

   Diluted Shares                                                      6,840,693         7,250,873
                                                                       =========         =========

Earnings Per Share

   Basic                                                                 $(0.19)             $0.01
                                                                         =======             =====

   Diluted                                                               $(0.19)             $0.01
                                                                         =======             =====

</TABLE>



                                       13
EXHIBIT
10.3





Terms of
Employment Arrangement


between
Bay National Bank


and
Richard J. Oppitz





Mr.
Oppitz was employed on an at-will basis at a rate of pay of $157,500 as of
September 5, 2008 until his termination effective January 7,
2009.  While employed, Mr. Oppitz was also eligible for incentive
bonuses at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors, and was entitled to all benefits available to full time employees of
Bay National Bank.





No
discretionary bonuses were paid to Mr. Oppitz for the period ended December 31,
2008.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         4928000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3088000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    6990000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              15623000
<PP&E>                                        77975000
<DEPRECIATION>                                18295000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                78152000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7995000
<BONDS>                                       36916000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      32909000
<OTHER-SE>                                      332000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  78152000
<SALES>                                       12553000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              12553000
<CGS>                                         11411000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 11411000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                976000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              832000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (666000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (666000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        

</TABLE>