alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
        10.2
 
 **MEMORANDUM
        OF AGREEMENT**
  This
        Memorandum of Agreement is dated the 30th day of August, 2006 and is entered
        into between **CLEARONE
        COMMUNICATIONS, INC.** ,
        a Utah
        corporation (the “Company”), and **KEN-A-VISION
        MFG. CO., INC.** ,
        a
        Missouri corporation (the “Buyer”), who agree as follows:
 
 **WHEREAS** ,
        the
        Company and the Buyer have entered into that certain Asset Purchase Agreement
        dated August 23, 2006 (the “APA”); and
 
 **WHEREAS** ,
        a
        dispute has arisen at the Closing contemplated in the APA as to the amount
        of
        the Purchase Price (as defined in the APA); and
 
 **WHEREAS** ,
        the
        Company and the Buyer wish to amend certain provisions of the APA as described
        below, capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein having the meanings
        ascribed thereto in the APA.
 
 **NOW
        THEREFORE** ,
        for
        good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
        hereby
        acknowledged by each of the Company and the Buyer; the parties hereto agree
        as
        follows:
 
 1.  Adjustment
        in Purchase Price. The APA
        is hereby amended to change the Purchase price to $635,000.
 
 2.  The
        Down Payment. The APA
        is hereby amended to change the amount of the Down Payment to $317,500.
 
 3.  The
        Note. The APA
        is hereby amended to change the amount of the Note to $317,500, to change
        the
        amount of the monthly payment under the Note to $14,360.00 and the date of
        the
        first payment due under the Note is changed to October 1, 2006.
 
 4.  Waiver
        of Conditions. Buyer
        waives the assignment to Buyer of the NeoSci agreement and the T2 supply
        agreement. Furthermore, each party hereto agrees to cooperate in the preparation
        and delivery following Closing of a Form 8594 in respect of the sale and.
        purchase of the Assets.
 
 5.  The
        APA
        remains unamended except as set forth above.
  IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Buyer have each executed this Memorandum
        of
        Agreement this 30th day of August, 2006.
  CLEARONE
                    COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                  
                  
                  Per:/s/
                    Craig E. Peeples
                KEN-A-VISION
                    MFG. CO., INC.
                  
                  
                  Per:/s/
                    Steven M.
                    Dunn
! " #$%&'

#()*+**+)*	)$*$#	*

,


----------"----------

#

".
















$"
(/

#(/


01 .
/


!
 ".

1 .
/

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

#2. ,


 ,

,
3 
 !"" ,
  
#$

%&'
 ,

..2".
.2"
4"
 
0
"


,,"

" 4"
5 
064

07

.


46,
#

"

$..""2 " #$

%88 9,"

" ,.9: ,
206"
.
"
,#;%3


,
"

""
,#$%&''&9,

<
,,
6
22040
9

IT IS ORDERED,,
."/

+()+ ;	(*+,


="2
 "06.2"
"


.2".
(as reflected in 

the last judgment issued)  .,"is reduced to 

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

+<
2",
7"
2
9002"",
> .

 ",00
.



IT IS SO ORDERED



/

Judge’s signature

+


/

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

 Southern District of Alabama

GERALD WAYNE HALL 11-00171-001

12153-003

2-15-2012

Pro Se

✔

✔

February 4, 2015

United States District Judge

Gerald Hall is not eligible for a reduction. The defendant was convicted of Felon in Possession of a Firearm, and his

guidelines were driven by U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1, which is not subject to a reduction under Amendment 782.

Callie V.S. Granade 

U.S. District Judge

Digitally signed by Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge 

DN: cn=Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge, o=U.S. 

Government, ou=Federal Judiciary, 

email=efile_granade@alsd.uscourts.gov, c=US 

Date: 2015.02.04 10:49:25 -06'00'

Case 1:11-cr-00165-CG-C Document 73 Filed 02/04/15 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        11,486,500
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      61,200
<MORTGAGE>                                   2,207,700
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   50,400
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              14,790,300
<CASH>                                           1,600
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             458,800
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       1,271,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,898,000
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             13,580,300
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 477,600
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          329,200
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                529,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          242,400
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           900
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,050,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,898,000
<PREMIUMS>                                     276,400
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            277,300
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               2,500
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 170,900
<BENEFITS>                                     411,100
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     26,600
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           152,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                105,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             64,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    64,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.71
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Salim Ghafari, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global  Environmental
Energy Corp.

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  Quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly
report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this Quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly report.

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
exchange act rules 13a-14 and 15d- 14) for the registrant and have:

     A) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this Quarterly report is being prepared;
     B) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
Quarterly report (the "evaluation date"); and
     C)  presented  in  this  Quarterly   report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the evaluation date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     A) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     B) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.


Date:  April 25, 2005

By:/s/Salim Ghafari
-----------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
Exhibit 23.3

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
following Registration Statements:



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-112530 on Form S-3,
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-100558 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-88143 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-88145 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-34938 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-88587 on Form S-3,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-88143 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-34938 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-112530 on Form S-3;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated March 20, 2008, with respect to the financial statements of CPPC-Decorative Products Co., Ltd., included in this Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. for the year ended
November 30, 2007.

/s/ Ernst & Young Office Limited

Bangkok, Thailand

March 20, 2008
Exhibit 32.2  Certification of
Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350 (Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)   I, Michael R. Williams, Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Interline Resources Corporation (the
"Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
our knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period March 31, 2008 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):  (1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Dated:  December 17, 2008 By:  /s/
Michael R. Williams Michael R. Williams Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer  * A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Interline
Resources Corporation and will be retained by Interline Resources Corporation
and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>

        EXHIBIT 12 -- COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
             (COMBINED WITH 50% OWNED UNCONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                      2001    2000     1999     1998    1997
          FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31             ----    -----    -----    ----    ----
(In millions)
<S>                                                   <C>     <C>      <C>      <C>     <C>
Income (loss) from continuing operations............  $165    $ 113    $(112)   $ 82    $106
Add
  Interest..........................................   107      134      146     133     124
  Portion of rentals representative of interest
     factor.........................................    14       15       18      12      12
  Preferred stock dividend requirements of
     majority-owned subsidiaries....................    --       --       --       1      --
  Income expense (benefit) and other taxes on
     income.........................................   118       91      (47)     67      75
  Amortization of interest capitalized..............     1       --       --      --      --
                                                      ----    -----    -----    ----    ----
  Earnings as defined...............................  $405    $ 353    $   5    $295    $317
                                                      ====    =====    =====    ====    ====
Interest............................................  $107    $ 134    $ 146    $133    $124
Interest capitalized................................     4        5       --       1       1
Portion of rentals representative of interest
  factor............................................    14       15       18      12      12
Preferred stock dividend requirements of
  majority-owned subsidiaries on a pretax basis.....    --       --       --       2      --
                                                      ----    -----    -----    ----    ----
Fixed charges as defined............................  $125    $ 154    $ 164    $148    $137
                                                      ====    =====    =====    ====    ====
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges..................  3.24     2.29     (a)     1.99    2.31
                                                      ====    =====    =====    ====    ====
</Table>

---------------
(a) In 1999, earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $159 million.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PLANETRX.COM, INC. FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          51,629
<SECURITIES>                                    65,119
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,276
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               138,618
<PP&E>                                          13,246
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 338,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,023
<BONDS>                                          6,847
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                     315,640
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   338,515
<SALES>                                          7,856
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,999
<CGS>                                            7,489
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,589
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                99,852
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (428)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (99,023)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (99,023)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (99,023)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (7.74)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (7.74)
<FN>
<F1>Reflects Basic EPS according to SFAS 128
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Henry Payne *v.*John Farr.

Personal Property — Sale—Innocent Purchaser.

A contract of sale of personal property, where the title is retained in the seller until paid for, will not enable the seller to recover the property from an innocent purchaser from his vendee.

*180APPEAL FROM BOURBON CIRCUIT COURT.

October 24, 1874.

*A. M. Swope, for appellant.*

*Brent & McMillan, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

.Without deciding whether there is such a bill of exceptions as would warrant us in reversing the judgment, if it appeared to be erroneous, we feel bound to affirm it. If every fact the evidence even tends to prove be treated as established, still the verdict and judgment are right, for there is no evidence whatever upon which an instruction authorizing the jury to find for the appellant could have been predicated.

The evidence does not even tend fe> prove that the appellant was, by the terms of the contract of sale, to retain the title until the check was paid, and if it did, we have decided at this term in *Vaughn v. Hopson,*overruling *Patton v. McCane,*15 B. Mon. 555, that a stipulation in the contract of sale of personal property, that the title is to remain in the vendor until the property is paid for, will not enable the seller to recover the property from an innocent purchaser from his vendee. Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XVIII  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form  10-Q  for
the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XVIII, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XVIII,  Inc.,  each  certify, pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ ROBERT P JOHNSON
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XVIII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 10, 2010


                          /s/ PATRICK W KEENE
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XVIII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 10, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

STEVEN KEITH GLATFELTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0122-CG-B

)

SGT. POPE, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant 

to the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is 

ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. 

DONE and ORDERED this 28th day of April, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00122-CG-B Document 39 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 1
#### FITZGERALD v. UNITED STATES.

Civ. No. 27524.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

March 28, 1951.

*223Alan Meltzer, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Don Miller, U. S. Dist. Atty., Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant.

JONES, Chief Judge.

This is an action for insurance benefits provided for by the National Service Life Insurance Act of 1940, as amended, U.S. C.A. Title 38, § 817. Defendant, .the United States of America, requests summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A.

Summary judgment will be denied.

Defendant by its motion contends that the complaint does not raise an issue regarding any material fact. It alleges lapse of the insurance policy for an admitted failure of the insured to pay the premiums between April 1, 1947 and June 25, 1948, and argues that this court is without authority to grant a retroactive waiver of the premiums. It also contends that this court is without power to direct that dividends be applied to premiums in arrears.

In opposition to defendant’s motion, plaintiff contends that material issues have been raised in regard to (1) refusal of the Administrator of Veterans Affairs to grant reinstatement of the policy, (2) his refusal to grant waiver of the premiums, and (3) his refusal to apply dividends to the premiums in arrears.

Fairly considered, the complaint raises material issues of fact. Plaintiff’s evidence will at least tend to show that insured had qualified for reinstatement of the insurance policy under the applicable regulations, 38 C.F.R., 1946 Supp., 10.3422 and 10.3401; 13 F.R. 181, in that he was in the required state of health when he filed his application for reinstatement. Also, plaintiff’s evidence will at least tend to show that the Administrator of Veterans Affairs should have granted a waiver of the premiums under 38 U.S.C.A. § 802(n), because the insured became totally disabled while the insurance policy was still in force, and his failure to make timely application was due to circumstances beyond his control.

Although the bases of the plaintiff’s claim rest upon alleged erroneous actions of the Administrator, heretofore conclusive, this court now is not without jurisdiction and power to review the decisions of the Administrator since the repeal of the excepting provision of Section 817 and the amendment of Section 808 both August *2241, 1946. See Unger v. U. S., D.C., 79 F.Supp. 281; U. S. v. Zazove, 334 U.S. 602, 68 S.Ct. 1284, 92 L.Ed. 1601.

Defendant’s final objection is well taken.

The regulations in force and effect at the time the facts of this case arose did not permit application of dividends to premiums in arrears. 38 C.F.R., 1947 Supp., 10.3426; 13 F.R. 5399. I find nothing in those regulations inconsistent with the statute.

Summary judgment denied.