1 TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT GRAY

STEPHEN BASSHAM , ) Docket N umber: 2022

- 02

- 0210

Employee, )

v. ) State File Number: 800835

- 2022 LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, INC. , )

Employer

. ) Judge Brian K. Addington

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

During an e xpedited hearing on February 14, 2023

, Stephen Bassham sought a second opinion for medical treatment for injuries to his wrists

. Lowe’s asserted that Mr. Bassham is not entitled to a second opinion. For the reasons below , the Court denies Mr. Bassham ’s request.

Claim History

Mr. Bassham began working for Lowe’s in October 2020. A few months later

, Lowes assigned him to building and dismantl ing various steel shelving throughout the store. Mr. Bassham testified that he removed and relocated racks and large steel beams used to display merchandise. He stated he had to pound the display racks with his hands / wr ists to remove and reins tall them

. He worked in this position for approximately two months, but Lowes eventually assigned him to setting up displays for different products.

Mr. Bassham testified that h e noticed pain in his wrists while golfing in spring 2021. He discussed the symptoms with his primary care doctor

. She sen t him for an EMG

. Mr. Bassham s aid the EMG did not show nerve damage , so he was referred to an orthopedist. 1

1 The EMG report and primary care doctor’s notes were not in the record. 

### FILED Feb 17, 2023 08:19 AM(CT)
TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS2

Mr. Bassham went to an orthopedic walk

- in clinic in March 2022 and saw Dr. Timothy Jenkins. 2 After reviewing x

- rays, Dr. Jenkins asked Mr. Bassham if he had suffered an acute injury. Mr. Bassham testified it was at th at moment he realized the repeated removal and installation of shelving at Lowe’s had caused his wrist pain. Dr. Jenkins dia gnosed complete bilateral ligament tears
, recommended physical therapy

, and an MRI

.

After Mr. Bassham notified his supervisor of the injury

, Lowe’s offered a physician panel

, and Mr. Bassham saw Dr. Clarence Gouldin g

. 3 Dr. Gouldin g was under the impression that Dr. Jenkins believed Mr. Bassham’s injury was work

- related, so he referred him back to Dr. Jenkins and wrote : “Further evaluation care and treatment will be as per Dr. Jenkins the orthopedist who has been working with the patient for the past two months.”

Mr. Bassham returned to Dr. Jenkins in June

, and he noted, “Patient has bilateral scaphol unate tears. He feels these are [a] work

- related event.” Dr. Jenkins reviewed the MRI results and referred him to Dr. Kent Lord, a hand specialist

. Lowe s accepted the referral to Dr. Lord.

The meeting with Dr. Lord did not proceed as Mr. Bassham hope d

, because according to him Dr. Lord was in a bad mood. Regardless, Dr. Lord reviewed the MRI, recommended an injection, and diagnosed bilateral wrist arthritis with traumatic ligament ruptures

. Mr. Bassham received the injection the same day and was told to return “as needed.”

In August, Lowe s asked Dr. Lord to provide a work status report. In it, he placed restrictions of no lifting , pushing, or pulling greater than five pounds. He also wrote that Mr. Bassham had reached maximum medical improvement without a permanent impairment.

In November, Lowe s sent Dr. Lord a questionnaire about Mr. Bassham’s injury. Dr. Lord responded that the injury occurred gradually . He answered yes to the question, “Considering the MRI, do you opine to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that Mr. Bassham’s arthritis is more likely than not an underlying pre

- existing condition?” Dr. Lord

a ffirmed his previous conclu sion that Mr. Bassham reached maximum medical improvement on August 31, 2022.

2 Mr. Bassham asked the Court to allow the late filing of the remaining portion of Dr. Jenkins’s office note. Lowe’s objected

, and the Court sustained the objection. T he office note was accepted for identification purposes only.

3 Due to the impending retirement of the physician that Mr. Bassham chose , the parties a greed for Mr. Bassham to see Dr. Gouldin g instead

.3

Mr. Bassham last received treatment in June 2022. He request ed Lowe s provide an independent doctor to explore options for treating his condition. In other words, he asked for a second opinion.

Lowe s argued that Mr. Bassham is not entitled to a second opinion because his authorized doctor did not recommend surgery or refer him for a second opinion.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

At an e xpedited hearing, Mr. Bassham must show he would likely prevail at a hearing on the merits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50

- 6

- 239(d)(1) (2022).

Here, Mr. Bassham requested a second opinion. Under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50

- 6

- 204(a)(3)(C) : “When the treating physician

. . . refers the injured employee, the employee shall be entitled to have a second opinion on the issue of surgery and diagnosis . . . from a panel of two (2) physicians practicing in the same specialty as the physician who recommended the surgery

. ” ( E mphasis added )

.

The Tennessee Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board determined that, “The phrase ‘as the physician who recommended the surgery’ necessarily requires there to be an opinion of a specialist recommend ing surgery before an injured worker is entitled to a second opinion on the issue of surgery and diagnosis.” Petty v. Convention Prod. Rigging

, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 95, at *21 (Dec. 29, 2016).

In this case, none of the physicians recommended surgery . Dr. Jenkins may have implied that surgery was an option when he referred Mr. Bassham to Dr. Lord , but he did
not record any recommendations in his medical record. Additionally , the fact that Dr. Jenkins referred Mr. Bassham to a “hand specialist” leads the Court to conclude that he was unsure of treatment options available to Mr. Bassha m

. The Court finds Mr. Bassham sincere in his belief that his condition may require surgery. However, the Court holds t hat he is unlikely to succeed at a hearing on the merits in proving he is entitled to a second opinion at this time

. Dr. Lord remains the authorized treating physician

, as he has not refused to treat him further

.

IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED

.

1. Mr. Bassham’s request that the Court order a second opinion is denied.

2. The Court sets a status hearing on April 10, 2023 , at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time . The parties must call (855) 543

- 5044 . Failure to call might result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.4

ENTERED February 17 , 20 2 3

.

________ ______________________________ BRIAN K. ADDINGTON , JUDGE Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

APPENDIX

Exhibits: 1. Affidavit of Stephen Bassham 2. Employee’s Choice of Physician form 3. Final Medical Report

- Dr. Kent Lord 4. Medical record Dr. Clarence Goulding 5. Medical record Watauga Orthopeadics, Drs. Timothy Jenkins, and Kent Lord 6. Medical questionnaire Dr. Kent Lord, November 15, 2022 7. (Identification only) Medical record Dr. Timothy Jenkins, March 30, 2022

Technical Record: 1. Petition for Benefit Determination 2. Dispute Certification Notice 3. Hearing Request 4. Employer’s Pre

- Hearing Brief

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a correct copy of this Order was sent on February 17 , 20 2 3

.

Name Certified

Mail Fax Email Service sent to:

Samuel McPeak

, Employee ’s Attorney X sam@hbm

- lawfirm.com sandy@hbm

- lawfirm.com Allison Tomey

, Employer’s Attorney X aptomey@mijs.com lsgwinn@mijs.com

______________________________________ PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK wc.courtclerk@tn.govFor self

- represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800

- 332

- 2667. Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal :

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order , you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “ Notice of Appeal,” and f ile the form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed . When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must
serve a copy upon all parties

.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in

- person at any B ureau office or by U.S. mail, hand

- delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully

complete d Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file it with the court clerk within ten busine ss days of the filing the Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board. If the Appe als Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you mu st file it with the court clerk within ten business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business days after you file your position sta tement. All position statements should include: (1) a statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.LB -1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082 NOTICE OF APPEAL Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries- at -work/ wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1- 800

- 332 -2667

Docket No. :

________________________ State File No.:

______________________ Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________ Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________ Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the
Workers’ Co mpensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date filestamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):



### □ Expedited Hearing Order fil ed on

_______________ 

### □ Motion Order filed on ___________________



### □ Compensation Order filed on

__________________ 

### □ Other Order filed on

_____________________ issued by Judge _____________________________________________________________________

____ .

Statement of the Issues on Appeal Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

______________________________________________________________________________________ __

______________________________________________________________________________________ __

______________________________________________________________________________________ __

______________________________________________________________________________________ __
Parties Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐ Employer ☐ Employee Address: _______________________________________________________

_ Ph one: ___________________ Email: __________________________________________________________ Attorney’s Na me:

_____________________________________________ _ BPR#: _______________________ Attorney’s E mail: _____________________________________________

_ Phone: _______________________ Attorney’s Ad dress:

_________________________________________________________________________ * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *LB -1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: __________________

__ _ Date of Inj.:

____

___________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐ Employer ☐ Employee App ellee’s Address:

_____________________________________________ _ Phone:

_ ___________________ Email: _________________________________________________________ Attorney’s Na me:

_____________________________________________ B PR#: ________________________ Attorney’s E mail: _____________________________________________ Phone:

_______________________ Attorney’s Ad dress:

_________________________________________________________________________ * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800- 02

- 21
, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

__ ____________________________________________ [Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]