alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1765 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to repeal the limitation 

on the maximum deduction for shelter expenses allowable for determination of benefits under such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2023 

Mr. PAYNE (for himself, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. NORTON, Mrs. 

CHERFILUS-MCCORMICK, Mr. GOMEZ, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. GARCI ́A of 

Illinois, Mr. MULLIN, Ms. PLASKETT, Mr. SMITH of Washington, and Ms. 

ADAMS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to repeal 

the limitation on the maximum deduction for shelter 

expenses allowable for determination of benefits under 

such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SNAP Benefits Fair5 ness Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1765 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

2 Section 5(e)(6) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 

3 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2014(e)(6)) is amended— 

4 (1) by striking subparagraph (B), and 

5 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) and 

6 (D) as subparagraphs (B) and (C), respectively. 

7 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

8 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

9 take effect on January 1 that 1st occurs after the date 

10 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                   EXHIBIT 32.2 -- SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew A. Campbell, certify that:

     (1) the Form 10-K of Pactiv Corporation for the period ended December 31,
         2003, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of sec.13(a)
         or sec.15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Pactiv Corporation for the period then ended.

/s/ ANDREW A. CAMPBELL
------------------------------------------------------
Andrew A. Campbell
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

March 15, 2004
------------------------------------------------------
Date

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Neutron Field Profiling for 

Neutron Activation Analysis 

1

Rafael Virador
Importance of Neutron Activation Analysis (NAA)

• Quantifying trace elements

• Arsenic: 19ppm from 100 mg; 

19 needles in 1 ton of hay

• Used in over 300 SRMs since 

1990

2
How NAA Works

• Technique

• Neutron irradiation

• Counting radioisotope

• The gamma rays energy identify elements

• Interactions are dependent on energy of 

neutrons in the core

• Important

• Used at UMD reactor

3

Rabbit
Reason/Background

• Neutron drop inside the rabbit 

• correction used at the NIST reactor no longer reliable 

• Investigate this discrepancy for the purpose of 

standardization

4

Vial arrangement 

within the rabbit
• UMD MUTR: 100 KW, light 

water

• NIST reactor: 20 MW, heavy 

water

• Foils target regions 

• Metal foils include: Cu, Ni, Zn, 

and Fe 

Purpose/Aim of this project

?

NCNR UMD

5
Neutron Monitors

• Gamma Acquisition 

• HPGe detectors

• Total neutrons and neutron energy

• captured neutrons are dependent on type of 

metal foil

• Measuring captured neutrons by released gamma 

rays

Sample changer

Foils on bottles

Specturm

6
Results

7

Neutrons/cm^2/second

Rabbit 2-2 Rabbit 2-1
Results

• Other foils highlight the energy 

regions of these neutrons

• Thermal and Epithermal energies

• Cadmium coverings used to 

isolate epithermal and fast regions 

of neutron energy

8

Cd Cover Metal Foil

Thermal

Fast

Epithermal
Future work

• Calculating the shape of the 

energy profile

• Investigating scattering effects 

at UMD

• Perform measurements at 

NCNR

9
Acknowledgements

• Dr. Nicholas Sharp

• Luke Gilde - UMD

• Mike Hottinger - UMD

10
11
12
EX-10.17




 EXHIBIT 10.17 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 ECPM
HOLDINGS, LLC 
 2013 INCENTIVE UNIT PLAN 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT, is made by ECPM Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), effective as of
the 9th day of September, 2013, to the Company’s 2013 Incentive Unit Plan, dated effective as of January 11, 2013 (the “Plan”). Capitalized terms used herein and not
otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan. 
 R E C I T A L S: 

WHEREAS, the Board of Managers of the Company has deemed it advisable to amend Section 5(a) of the Plan to increase the number of
authorized Incentive Units available for grant under the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, the requisite members of the Company have consented to the
amendments contemplated herein; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to evidence such amendments by executing this First Amendment; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS DECLARED that, effective as of the day and year first written above, the Plan shall be and hereby is amended as follows:

 1. Amendment to Section 5(a). Section 5(a) of the Plan (“Incentive Units Subject to the Plan”) is hereby
deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
 “Incentive Units Subject to the Plan: Subject
to adjustments as provided in Section 5(b), the maximum number of Incentive Units that may be issued pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan shall not exceed 12,628,718 Incentive Units (or such other number of Incentive Units as may be
authorized pursuant to the terms of the LLC Agreement).” 
 2. Continued Effect. Except as set forth herein, the Plan shall be
unchanged and shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment is executed on behalf of the Company
effective as of the day and year first written above. 
  

			
	ECPM HOLDINGS, LLC
		
	By:		 /s/ Mark Gilreath

			Mark Gilreath
			President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-18-1998
<CASH>                                          40,106
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,280
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    133,225
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               212,174
<PP&E>                                         935,395
<DEPRECIATION>                                 520,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 845,334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          354,836
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           102
<OTHER-SE>                                    (529,646)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   845,334
<SALES>                                        691,908
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               691,908
<CGS>                                          486,723
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  486,723
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               231,591
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (58,865)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (58,865)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1,739)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (60,604)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (6.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
#### T. L. Anderson *v.*A. A. Grady, et al.

Appeals — J urisdiction.

The court of appeals has no jurisdiction of an appeal taken from an order of the court which was not a final 'order.

Final Judgment.

A final judgment is one which finally determines the rights of the parties.

APPEAL PROM BARREN CIRCUIT COURT.

March 2, 1876.

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

The orders appealed from in this case are not final orders within the meaning of section 15 of the Civil Code; and this court, therefore, has no jurisdiction of this appeal. If the appellant desired to rest his case upon his demurrer he should have so intimated to the *625circuit court, and allowed such judgment to be rendered as that court deemed right, and then have prosecuted his appeal from the judgment.

*J. H.*Lewis, *for appellant.*

Until the action is disposed of by a judgment finally determining the rights of the parties so far as the circuit court is concerned, no appeal will lie.

Appeal *dismissed.*
[Exhibit 32.2]

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of BF Acquisition Group
IV,  Inc.  (the "Company") on  Form 10-KSB for the period  ending
April  30,  2004  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Colucci,
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and
          (2)  The  information contained in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 16, 2004

                                /s/ William Colucci
                                ---------------------------------
                                William Colucci, Treasurer
                                BF Acquisition Group III, Inc.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

vs. ) Criminal Action No. 10-00112-KD-C 

 ) 

DAVID WAYNE MOORE ) 

Defendant. ) 

 ORDER 

This matter is before the Court on the Government’s appeal of the preliminary order of 

release pending the detention hearing (Doc. 5). As grounds for appeal, the Government contends 

that because the underlying charge invokes the presumption of detention it was error to release the 

Defendant pending the detention hearing. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2)(B) (“During a continuance, 

such person shall be detained . . . .”). However, the Government neglects to inform the Court that 

assuming error was committed, it was invited by the Government. The undersigned has reviewed 

the recording of the proceeding in which the Government clearly states that this case is “not a 

presumption case.” Thereafter, U.S. Magistrate Judge Cassady announced his intent to release the 

Defendant pending the detention hearing based, inter alia, on the fact that this was not a 

“presumption case.” No objection was interposed on the record as to the Defendant’s temporary 

release.1 

Judge Cassady has not had the opportunity to consider the issues which have been raised on 

appeal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Government’s appeal (Doc. 5) is hereby 

REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Cassady. Moreover, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to docket 

 

 1 The Government states that an objection was made to the lack of electronic monitoring at 

some later time off the record. 

Case 1:10-cr-00112-KD-C Document 12 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

the Government’s appeal (Doc. 5) as a motion for reconsideration. 

Further, the Government’s request for a stay is also REFERRED to Judge Cassady pursuant 

to Local Rule 72.3(f) which provides: “The filing of a statement of appeal does not act as an order 

staying operation of the magistrate judge’s order pending appeal. Any motion for a stay pending 

appeal shall be filed and promptly delivered in the first instance to the magistrate judge whose order 

is appealed; if the magistrate judge denies the motion for a stay, the motion may be addressed to the 

assigned district judge.” 

DONE and ORDERED this the 15th day of June 2010. 

 /s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

 KRISTI K. DUBOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 1:10-cr-00112-KD-C Document 12 Filed 06/15/10 Page 2 of 2
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document





































 



 
 

  EXHIBIT 10.41    
    


 
    Performance Long Term Incentive Plan for Fiscal 2015    
    



        On June 26, 2014, the Board approved the Company's Performance Long Term Cash Incentive Plan. The plan provides the Company's
executive officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer) with the opportunity to earn long term cash bonuses based upon the achievement of pre-established long term performance goals. The plan
provides for 100% of the bonus to be based on the achievement of a cumulative three year objective. For fiscal year 2015 grants, the performance goals under the plan are based on increases to the free
cash flow of the Company. Actual payout opportunities will range from a threshold of 50% of target to a maximum of 200% of target based on achievement of the performance goals. Cash payments under the
Performance Long Term Cash Incentive Plan will occur on the third anniversary of the initial grant date if the performance targets are met or exceeded. For purposes of determining achievement of award
opportunities, the Performance Long Term Cash Incentive Plan uses free cash flow an adjusted, non-GAAP measure. For purposes of this Plan, the Company defines free cash flow as net cash flows from
operating activities less purchases of property and equipment, net of dispositions. The Performance Long Term Cash Incentive Plan was adopted as a replacement for up to 50% of the performance-based
restricted stock units granted each year to certain executive officers. 











QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.41


Performance Long Term Incentive Plan for Fiscal 2015
EXHIBIT 11.1

                       booktech.com, inc. and Subsidiary

                    Computation of Net Loss Per Common Share

 For the Year Ended December 31, 2000, the Five Months Ended December 31, 1999
                        and the Year Ended July 31, 1999

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                           Five Months
                                                           Year Ended         Ended
                                                          December 31,     December 31,       Year Ended
                                                              2000             1999         July 31, 1999
                                                          ------------     ------------     -------------
<S>                                                       <C>              <C>              <C>
BASIC NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:
Net loss attributable to common stockholders ...........  $ (8,194,279)    $ (1,060,646)    $ (2,182,431)
                                                          ------------     ------------     ------------
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
     Common Stock ......................................    16,123,291        6,921,001        6,016,552
                                                          ------------     ------------     ------------

Basic net loss per common share ........................  $       (.51)    $       (.15)    $       (.36)
                                                          ============     ============     ============

DILUTED NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:
Net loss attributable to common stockholders ...........  $ (8,194,279)    $ (1,060,646)    $ (2,182,431)
                                                          ------------     ------------     ------------
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
     Common Stock ......................................    16,123,291        6,921,001        6,016,552
     Effect of Potentially dilutive common shares ......          --               --               --
                                                          ------------     ------------     ------------
          Total ........................................    16,123,291        6,921,001        6,016,552
                                                          ------------     ------------     ------------

     Diluted net loss per common share .................  $       (.51)    $       (.15)    $       (.36)
                                                          ============     ============     ============

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         184,236
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  555,823
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,133)
<INVENTORY>                                    472,115
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,252,190
<PP&E>                                         1,678,667
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,173,636)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,144,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          963,486
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,759,149
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,044,013)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,144,654
<SALES>                                        1,190,937
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,190,937
<CGS>                                          836,859
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,210,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               42,041
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             719
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (62,140)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (62,140)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (62,140)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.017)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.017)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 75125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29597]



[[Page 75125]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-165-2014]


Foreign-Trade Zone 57--Charlotte, North Carolina Application for 
Expansion of Subzone 57C DNP Imagingcomm America Corporation Concord, 
North Carolina

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Board by the Charlotte Regional Partnership, Inc., grantee of FTZ 57, 
requesting the expansion of Subzone 57C, located at the facility of the 
DNP Imagingcomm America Corporation in Concord, North Carolina. The 
application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-
Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of 
the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on December 
10, 2014.
    The grantee proposes to expand Subzone 57C to include an additional 
12.93 acres (new subzone total acreage = 27.63 acres). The subzone is 
located at 4541 Enterprise Drive NW., Concord, Cabarrus County, North 
Carolina. The subzone would be subject to the existing activation limit 
of FTZ 57. No authorization for production activity has been requested 
at this time.
    In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Kathleen Boyce of 
the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to evaluate and analyze the facts 
and information presented in the application and case record and to 
report findings and recommendations to the FTZ Board.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary at the 
address below. The closing period for their receipt is January 26, 
2015. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the 
foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period 
to February 10, 2015.
    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection 
at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, 
Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230-0002, and in the ``Reading Room'' section of the 
FTZ Board's Web site, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Kathleen Boyce at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4a012b3e22262f2f2464082533292f0a3e382b2e2f642d253c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="034862776b6f66666d2d416c7a60664377716267662d646c75">[email protected]</span></a> at (202) 482-1346.

    Dated: December 10, 2014.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29597 Filed 12-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>