alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RESORTS
INTERNATIONAL HOTEL, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
THERETO INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         $51,392<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   $8,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                    $3,569
<INVENTORY>                                     $1,430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               $60,938
<PP&E>                                        $224,649
<DEPRECIATION>                                  $7,683
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                $393,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          $33,876
<BONDS>                                       $205,921<F2>
<COMMON>                                        $1,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    $117,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  $393,350
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              $211,136
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 $156,706
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                $9,765<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             $13,821
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 $2,970
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             $2,970
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                $(2,957)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       $13
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES NON-RESTRICTED CASH EQUIVALENTS OF $39,878.
<F2>NET OF UNAMORTIZED (DISCOUNTS) PREMIUMS.
<F3>INCLUDES DEPRECIATION EXPENSE OF $7,911 AND AMORTIZATION OF $1,855.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                        FIDUCIARY CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.
                        --------------------------------

                        STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET
                         INVESTMENT INCOME PER LIMITED
                                PARTNERSHIP UNIT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 For the Three Months            For the Six Months
                                                 Ended September 30,             Ended September 30,
                                             --------------------------      --------------------------
                                                 1998           1997            1998            1997
                                             ----------      ----------      ----------      ----------

<S>                                          <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>        
Net Investment Income                        $   44,745      $  159,743      $  129,001      $  537,908

Percentage Allocable to Limited Partners             99%             99%             99%             99%
                                             ----------      ----------      ----------      ----------

Net Investment Income Allocable
   to Limited Partners                       $   44,298      $  158,146      $  127,711      $  532,529
                                             ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========

Weighted Average Number of Limited
   Partnership Units Outstanding              1,201,564       1,299,176       1,201,564       1,299,176
                                             ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========

Net Investment Income Per Limited
   Partnership Unit                          $      .04      $      .12      $      .11      $      .41
                                             ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



William C. Owens as Chief Executive Officer and President of Owens Financial Group, Inc., the General Partner of Owens Mortgage Investment Fund, a California Limited Partnership (the Registrant), and Bryan H. Draper, as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Owens Financial Group, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

(1)     the Registrants Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the applicable requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ William C. Owens

William C. Owens

Chief Executive Officer and President of Owens Financial Group, Inc., General Partner

May 15, 2006



/s/ Bryan H. Draper

Bryan H. Draper

Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Owens Financial Group, Inc., General Partner

May 15, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerome S. Flum, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ Jerome S. FlumJerome S. FlumChief Executive Officer





May 12, 2011





This certification is being furnished to the SEC with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section.
DISMISS; Opinion filed December 6, 2012

In The nitrt 

## nf :ppiati 

## iftt! Ditrirt nf ixzu at Ja11zti No. 05-12-00482-CV

TENNA R. ADAMS AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF 7318 ELDERBERRY LANE, l)ALLAS, TEXAS 75239, Appellants V. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appcllee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

### No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause 

### No. CC-l1-08457-C



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley. Francis, and Lang 

### Opinion By Justice Francis Beforethe Courtis appellee’s November 14, 2012 

### motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellee contends the appeal shouldbe dismissed forfailure to prosecute. By letterdated October 15, 2012. the Court informed appellants thattheirbriefwas past due. The Court instructed appellants to file their briefwith an extension motion within ten days and that failure to do so would result in 

### dismissal oftheir appeal. See TEx. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). As oftoday’s date, appellants have not filed a brief. Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEx. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(l) & 42.3(b) & (C). I 

## / j

- JUST1CI’ I20482F.P05

## (nairt uf 41t1ra1! FiftI! itrirt t.if 

### 1ixa at 

## Jalla& JUDGMENT TENNA R. ADAMS ANI) ALL OTHER Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 OCCUPANTS OF 7318 ELDERBERRY ofDallas County, Texas. (TrCt.No. CC-IlLANE, DALLAS,TEXAS 75249, Appellants 08457-C). Opinion delivered

### by Justice Francis. Justices No. 05-l2-00482-CV V. Moseley and Lang, participating. WELLS FARGo BANK, N.A., Appellee Based on the Court’s opinion ofthis date. the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORI)EREI) that appellee. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., recover its costs ofthe appeal from appellants, TennaR. AdamsandAllOtherOccupants of7318 ElderberryLane, Dallas, Texas 75249. Judgment entered December 6. 2012. 

## •\ I i i 

## it

# ]JL ‘L’’ MOLLY FR NCIS JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0403

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM HOMER MCCLELLAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

file Appellant’s opening brief and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is given an extension of 

time until March 7, 2024, to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening 

brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 29 2024

01/29/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0403
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
Stephen J. Thomas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2012, of Gaiam, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

Date:
April 1, 2013



/s/ Stephen J. ThomasStephen J. ThomasChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

REGINALD BURRELL, *

*

Petitioner, *

*

vs. * CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-00242-KD-B

*

CHERYL PRICE, *

*

Respondent. *

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue 

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge (doc. 22) made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion 

of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED as time barred.

Petitioner is not entitled to a Certificate of Appealability and any request for leave to 

appeal in forma pauperis is due to be denied. 

DONE this 15th day of July 2016.

s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:13-cv-00242-KD-B Document 23 Filed 07/15/16 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Theater Xtreme Entertainment Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Theresa Q. Hoffmann, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: November 6, 2008





/s/ Theresa Q. Hoffmann

Theresa Q. Hoffmann,

Chief Financial Officer
| 1. | The Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  April 27, 2010 | /s/ Lee W. Hendrickson                                                                          Lee W. HendricksonChief Financial Officer |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 12.1
 Doral Financial Corporation
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 Quarter EndedMarch
31, 2010Including Interest on DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax loss from continuing operations
    
    $
    (974
    )Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    66,015Total Earnings
    
    $
    65,041Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    65,426Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized
expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    41An estimate of the interest component within rental expense
    
    
    548Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    66,015Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    (A)Excluding Interest on Deposits(Loss) Earnings:Pre-tax loss from continuing operations
    
    $
    (974
    )Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    39,315Total Earnings
    
    $
    38,341Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    38,726Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized
expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    41An estimate of the interest component within rental expense
    
    
    548Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    39,315Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    (A)
 (A)
    
    Due to the Companys pre-tax loss for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 the ratio coverage was less than 1:1.
The Company would have to generate additional earnings of $1.0 million to
achieve a ratio of 1:1 during the first quarter of 2010.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          42,963
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          59,723
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,330
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    241,633
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         535,477
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           536,058
<LOANS>                                      4,387,974
<ALLOWANCE>                                     47,192
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,720,109
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,313,765
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,525,745
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             26,086
<LONG-TERM>                                    460,611
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           203
<OTHER-SE>                                     393,699
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               5,720,109
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                165,917
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               33,496
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               199,413
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              78,597
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,538
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           75,278
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,360
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 412
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 63,105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,144
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      20,144
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,294
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.98
<LOANS-NON>                                     16,201
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   805
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                49,832
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    7,900
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,900
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               47,192
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            47,192
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) CRIMINAL ACTION 09-00231-CG-N 

 ) 

HEATHER GARRICK, ) 

Defendant. ) 

 ORDER

 This action is before the Court on the United States’ motion to continue the February 

2010 trial of this matter for Pre-Trial Diversion (Doc. 28). Assistant U.S. Attorney Michele 

O’Brien has informed the Court that the United States has recommended that the Defendant 

participate in the Pre-Trial Diversion program administered by the United States Probation 

Office; and that while she has been unsuccessful in attempting to contact defense counsel before 

filing this motion “has a good faith belief that the Defendant would join in the request for a 

continuance . . . .” (Doc. 28 at 1). However, additional time is necessary for the United States 

Probation Office to interview and evaluate the Defendant to determine her suitability for the 

program and the appropriate conditions. 

 The Court finds that the period of time during which prosecution is deferred is excludable 

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ' 3161(h)(2). Accordingly, this case is hereby CONTINUED to the 

March 2010 trial term and the United States is ORDERED to notify the Court as to the decision 

of the United States Probation Office. 

DONE and ORDERED on this the 27th day of January 2010. 

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cr-00231-CG-M Document 29 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Renee Chapman, Contact Representative or Theresa Kingsberry, Legal Assistant, Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room CC-5301, Washington, DC 20024, (202) 326-3100.

By Direction of the Commission.

 Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-28940 Filed 12-10-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
11690.

#### NEVE *v.*GRAVES *et al.*

Invited guests in an automobile driven by the owner and operated with gasoline bought by them were not liable for injury caused in the operation of the car, under the allegations of the plaintiff’s petition.

Decided March 8, 1921.

Action for damages; from city court of Atlanta — Judge Reid. June 12, 1920.

Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

*Edgar Latham,*for plaintiff. *John T. Smith,*for defendant.

Luke, J.

This case arises by reason of a suit for damages, wherein the plaintiff alleges that while she was a passenger in an automobile traveling along one of the streets in the City of Atlanta, an automobile driven and owned by one Shivery collided with the machine in which she was riding, and, as a result thereof, she was thrown from her machine and suffered injury. The suit is not against the owner and driver, Shivery, but is against four persons who were riding in the machine with Shivery as his invited guests. *379It is alleged that the invited guests so sued neither had nor claimed an interest in the automobile in which they were riding, but that the invited guests had bought some oil and gasoline that was put in the car and was being used in the propelling of the car at the time of her injury, and that they were engaged in a joint enterprise. It does not appear why Shivery was not sued. The defendants filed a general demurrer to the petition. The general demurrer was sustained and the petition was dismissed. It was not error to sustain the general demurrer and dismiss the petition. See *Adamson*v. *McEwen,*12 *Ga. App.*508 (77 S. E. 591).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*