alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
following Registration Statements:



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-112530 on Form S-3,
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-100558 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-88143 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-88145 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-34938 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-88587 on Form S-3,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-88143 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-34938 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-112530 on Form S-3;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated March 19, 2008, with respect to the financial statements of CG-OMNOVA Decorative Products (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1) of OMNOVA
Solutions Inc. for the year ended November 30, 2007.

/s/ Ernst & Young Hua Ming

Shanghai, the Peoples Republic of China

March 19, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 245 (Monday, December 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 76321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29879]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Peninsula Power, LLC; Docket No. ER15-486-000]


Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing 
Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Peninsula Power, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application 
includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is January 5, 2015.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#df999a8d9c90b1b3b6b1ba8caaafafb0adab9fb9baadbcf1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8fefdeafbf7d6d4d1d6ddebcdc8c8d7caccf8deddcadb96dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 15, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29879 Filed 12-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Bay National Corporation
      (the “Company”) each certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
      year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and information contained
      in that Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/Hugh
      W. Mohler





Hugh
      W.
      Mohler


Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer


March
      28,
      2006








/s/
      Mark A. Semanie





Mark
      A.
      Semanie


Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


March
      28,
      2006





This
      certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
      to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,181
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,850
<ALLOWANCES>                                       160
<INVENTORY>                                     10,078
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,922
<PP&E>                                          13,556
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,702
<BONDS>                                          5,251
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            77
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,738
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,323
<SALES>                                         26,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,415
<CGS>                                           15,695
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,407
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    694
<INCOME-TAX>                                        88
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                606
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       606
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23

                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Monsanto Company's
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-36636, 2-76696, 2-90152,
33-13197, 33-21030, 33-39704, 33-39705, 33-39706, 33-39707, 33-49717,
33-53363, 33-53365, 33-53367, 333-02783, 333-02961, 333-02963, 333-33531,
333-38599, 333-45341 and 333-76653) and Registration Statements on Form
S-4 (Nos. 333-66175 and 333-73233) of our report dated February 26, 1999
(December 29, 1999 as to the Subsequent Events and Discontinued
Operations Notes), incorporated by reference in this amended annual
report on Form 10-K/A of Monsanto Company for the year ended December 31,
1998.

                             /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
January 21, 2000
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 D0 39 8 . LARRY TI MOTHY CARTER v . SHERRY TI LLMAN, CLERK.

On Decem

b er 1 4
, 2 01 7
, t h e t ri al co u rt en t ered an ord er d en y i ng Larry Ti m o t hy
Cart er’ s m o t i o n fo r a free co p y o f h i s g u i l t y p l ea t ran s cri p t

. On Feb ru ary 1
, 2 0 1 8,
Cart er fi led an ap p l i cat io n fo r d i s cret io n ary ap p eal i n t h e Su prem e Co u rt , wh i ch

s u b s eq u en t l y tran s ferred t he ap p l i cat i o n here. W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n b ecau s e t h e
ap p li cat io n was n o t t i m el y fi l ed

. To b e ti m el y , an a p p l i c at i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal m u st b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0
d ay s o f t he en t ry o f t h e o rd er o r ju d g m en t t o b e ap p eal ed . See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (d );

H i l l v. S t a t e , 2 0 4 Ga. Ap p

. 5 8 2, 5 8 2 (4 2 0 SE2 d 3 9 3 ) (1 9 9 2 ). Th e req u i r e m e n t s o f
OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 are ju ri s d i ct i o n al
, an d t hi s Co u rt can n o t accep t an ap pl i cat i o n fo r
ap p eal n o t m ad e i n co m

p l i an ce t h erewi t h

. B o

yl e v. S ta t e , 1 9 0 Ga. Ap p

. 7 3 4
, 7 3 4 (3 8 0
SE2 d 5 7 ) (1 9 89 ). Cart er fi l ed t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n 4 9 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e o rd er h e

s eek s t o ap p eal
, an d i t is t h erefo re u n t i m el y

. Acco rd i n g ly
, t h i s ap p l i cat io n i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. April 18, 2018

04/18/2018
#### Marks Cohen and Another, Trading as The Boys Friend Novelty Company, Respondents, *v.*Dave Sovalsky and Another, Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 8, 1925.

Bills and notes — action on promissory notes against maker and indorser — plaintiff gave indorser parol notice of protest three months after note became due — indorser entitled to notice of protest within reasonable time — notice to indorser not given within reasonable time — judgment reversed.

Judgment in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on promissory notes against the maker and indorser, should be reversed and a new trial ordered, where it appears that the plaintiff gave the indorser parol notice of protest three months after the note became due, since said indorser was entitled to a notice of protest within a reasonable time after the note matured. A protest given three months after the note became due is not given within a reasonable time.

Appeal by defendant Brooks from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Second District, in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants for $285.80 damages and interest, besides costs, entered on verdict. Trial by jury. •

*Godwin & Golden [William R. Golden*of counsel], for the appellant.

*Leo Rocldin,*for the respondent.

Guy, J.:

Action on two promissory notes for $283 made by defendant Sovalsky and indorsed by defendant Brooks. The complaint was amended at the trial so as to specifically allege indorsement by Brooks. The notes matured July ninth and July twenty-third respectively.

Defense, denial; also that indorsement was without recourse against Brooks.

Plaintiff proved execution, indorsement and delivery of notes; also Sovalsky’s refusal to pay them when payment was demanded. *369But the only proof of protest or notice to Brooks as to $133 note was a parol notice three months after note became due.

Defendant Brooks testified to indorsement of notes; also to alleged agreement that indorsement was without recourse and that he received no notice of protest. Later he testified that in October he was told over the telephone that the notes were unpaid. Sovalsky and another witness corroborated him.

A notary public’s certificate of protest of one of the notes was admitted which lacked a seal.

The jury found a verdict for plaintiffs.

A notary’s written instrument, other than the proof of acknowledgment of a deed or mortgage, is not invalidated by the omission of his seal. It is only when requested that a notary is required to affix his seal to the protest of a note. (Executive Law, § 105, subd. 2.)

The indorser was entitled to notice of protest within a reasonable time after the $133 note matured. A delay from July ninth to October was not within a reasonable time.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event, unless plaintiffs within ten days stipulate to reduce recovery to $150 principal, with interest and costs, and in that event judgment as so modified affirmed, without costs.

All concur; present, Guy, O’Malley and Levy, JJ.
Exhibit 23 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of DirectorsSouthern First Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
                     Statement of Greenville First Bancshares, Inc. on Form S-8 relating
                     to the Greenville First Bancshares, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan
                     and 2006 Greenville First Bancshares, Inc. Restricted Stock Plan
                     (File no. 333-133379), of our report dated March 2, 2010, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Southern First
                     Bancshares, Inc. (formerly known as Greenville First Bancshares,
                     Inc.) and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders'
                     equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year then
                     ended, which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Southern
                     First Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009. /s/ Elliott Davis, LLC Greenville, South Carolina March 2, 2010


---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1763 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1763

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to exclude from income for 
   purposes of eligibility for the supplemental nutrition assistance 
  program the basic allowance for housing received by members of the 
                          uniformed services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2023

Mr. Panetta (for himself and Mrs. Rodgers of Washington) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to exclude from income for 
   purposes of eligibility for the supplemental nutrition assistance 
  program the basic allowance for housing received by members of the 
                          uniformed services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Family Nutrition Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING FROM INCOME.

    Section 5(d) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 
2014(d)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (18), by striking ``and'' at the end,
            (2) in paragraph (19)(B) by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and'', and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(20) a basic allowance for housing paid to, or by a third 
        party on behalf of, a member of a uniformed service under 
        section 403 of title 37, United States Code.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Philip F. POSTLEWAITE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MCGRAW HILL, INC., a New York Corporation, Respondent-Appellee.

Docket No. 99-7032.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 11, 2001.

Philip F. Postlewaite, Chicago, IL, pro se.

Richard Dannay, Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, N.Y., NY, for appellee.

Present MESKILL, KEARSE and SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

This cause came on to be heard on the record *from*the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and was argued by petitioner *pro se*and by counsel for respondent.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment and order of said District Court be and they hereby are affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Stanton’s Opinion and Order dated October 26, 1998, rejecting petitioner’s challenges to the arbitration award, *17and in his endorsed order dated November 3, 1999, denying petitioner’s motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) for relief from the judgment.

We have considered all of petitioner’s contentions on this appeal and have found in them no basis for reversal. The judgment and order of the district court are affirmed.
10919.

#### Hammond *v.*City of Atlanta.

Decided May 5, 1920.

Action for damages; from city court of Atlanta—• Judge Eeid. September 13, 1919.

Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

*W. R. Hammond,*for plaintiif in error.

*J. L. Mayson, J. M. Wood,*contra.

Stephens, J.

1. A municipality is not liable fox a tortious injury resulting from tlie acts of its servants or officers while engaged in the performance of their governmental duties. The maintenance and operation, *by*a municipality, of a fire department for the purpose of preventing and extinguishing fires being a governmental duty, the municipality is not liable in damages to a bystander upon one of its sidewalks, who was knocked down and hurt by a hose-reel which was being operated by firemen of the municipality while engaged in an attempt to extinguish a fire. See, in this connection: *Love v. City of Atlanta,*95 *Ga.*129 (22 S. E. 29, 51 Am. St. R. 64) ; *Watson*v. *City of Atlanta,*136 *Ga.*370 (71 S. E. 664) ; *Rogers*v. *City of Atlanta,*143 *Ga.*153 (84 S. E. 555). The above ruling is clearly distinguishable from that in *City Council of Augusta*v. *Cleveland,*148 *Ga.*734 (98 S. E. 345), where it was held, that, where the employees of a city in the exercise of a governmental function left a dangerous obstruction in the sidewalk, the city was nevertheless liable to one not chargeable with negligence who was injured thereby, since it was the duty of the city to maintain and keep its sidewalks safe and free from dangerous obstructions.

2. The petition failed to allege a cause of action, and was properly dismissed on demurrer.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

***URANIUM RESOURCES,INC.***

405 State Highway 121 Bypass, Building A, Suite 110, Lewisville,TX 75067

972.219.3330 Phone   972.219.3311 Fax

 

May 12, 2008

 

Securities and ExchangeCommission

450 5th Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

 

I, Thomas H. Ehrlich,Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Uranium Resources, Inc.(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the period ended March 31, 2008 which thiscertification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| */s/* Thomas H. Ehrlich                     |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Thomas H. Ehrlich                           |   |
| Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |   |
| May 12, 2008                           |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of
Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350 (Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)   I, Michael R. Williams, Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Interline Resources Corporation (the
"Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
our knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period March 31, 2008 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):  (1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Dated:  December 17, 2008 By:  /s/
Michael R. Williams Michael
R. Williams Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer  * A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Interline
Resources Corporation and will be retained by Interline Resources Corporation
and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### MINNETONKA BRANDS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-1014.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 19, 2001.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of the United States’ unopposed motion to dismiss its appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted and the United States’ appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES



|                                          |  |                       
|----------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Name                                      |  | State of Incorporation
|R/xxPharmacy Solutions, Inc.              |  | Arizona               
|HealthExtras Benefits Administrator, Inc. |  | Delaware              
|HCEM Corporation                          |  | Delaware              
|U.S. Scripts, Inc.                        |  | Delaware              
|Managed Healthcare Systems, Inc.          |  | Florida               
|Catalyst Consultants                      |  | Nevada                
|Catalyst Rx                               |  | Nevada                
|Catalyst Rx Government Services, Inc.     |  | Nevada                
|Catalyst Rx IPA, Inc.                     |  | New York              
|EBRx, Inc.                                |  | Pennsylvania