alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.16**Schedule of Compensation Arrangements with Directors****Board of Directors Fees**     Commencing with the election of new directors at the 2006 annual meeting of stockholders anduntil the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders, there were two levels of Board fees with one levelfor non-executive directors who are not affiliated with a significant stockholder in the totalamount of $100,000, and a second level for non-executive directors who are affiliated with asignificant stockholder in us in the total amount of $75,000. In April 2007, the Board increasedthe basic Board fees for a non-executive director to a total amount of $120,000, with such amountseffective from the May 2007 annual meeting of shareholders. In conjunction with the increase, feesfor attending meetings or executing consents were discontinued. The Board fees are paid seventypercent in cash and thirty percent in the form of shares of restricted stock pursuant to the EquityPlan that vest after one complete year of service as a director. The cash portion of the Board feesis paid 50% within two weeks after the annual meeting at which directors are elected, and 50% bythe following November 30.**Committee Fees**     The Chairman of three of the Board’s five committees, excluding the Nominating and CorporateGovernance Committee and the Special Committee, receives an annual fee of $15,000 for accepting theadditional responsibilities of chairing a Board committee. The Board resolved on April 19, 2007 toincrease the fees to be paid to Messrs. Gallagher and Smyth to $50,000 for their service on theExecutive Committee.     Upon formation of the Special Committee, the Board did not approve any special compensation ofmembers for service on the Special Committee; rather, the Board determined that compensation of theSpecial Committee members would be determined by the Board based upon the time and effort expendedby the Special Committee members. The Board intended that such compensation would not be based uponthe successful completion of a transaction, but upon the extent to which the Special Committeemembers performed additional services on behalf of us. The amount of $1.25 million determined bythe Board and was paid to members of the Special Committee without regard to the success of theOffer.     The amount of Board fees and committee chairmanship fees paid to a director is subject to prorata adjustment and refund to us, at the discretion of the Board, in the event of a director’sresignation prior to completion of his scheduled term of service to us. Stock options areautomatically granted to independent directors under the Equity Plan. However, each eligibledirector waived his right to receive stock options in 2005, 2006 and 2007, with the exception ofMr. Herman who received 2,500 options in 2005. We pay for non-employee directors’ accommodationsand business class travel to and from the meetings of the Board and of committees.     The current compensation program for non-executive directors is designed to compensate thedirectors fairly for work performed for a company of our size.**
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 244 (Friday, December 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 75799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29703]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP13-499-000; Docket No. CP13-502-000]


Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC; Iroquois Gas Transmission 
System, L.P.; Notice Establishing Comment Due Date

    On November 13, 2014, Stop the Pipeline (STP) filed a motion 
(motion) requesting that the Commission compel the Constitution 
Pipeline Company, LLC (Constitution) to provide STP with the precedent 
agreements entered into by and between Constitution and specific 
shippers for firm transportation service on certain proposed projects. 
Constitution filed the precedent agreements and requested privileged 
treatment for these documents pursuant to section 388.112(b) of the 
Commission's regulations. On November 24, 2014, STP withdrew its 
motion, stating that it received a copy of the precedent agreements 
from Constitution on November 21, 2014.
    Notice is hereby given that STP may file additional comments in 
response to Constitution's filed precedent agreements until and 
including January 2, 2015.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On December 2, 2014, the Commission issued an order in these 
proceedings authorizing the proposed projects, subject to 
conditions. 149 FERC ] 61,199 (2014). Requests for rehearing are due 
January 2, 2015. See 18 CFR 385.713 and 385.2007(a)(2) (2014).

    Dated: December 8, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29703 Filed 12-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8, No. 333-37280) pertaining to the 1990 incentive stock option plan, 1998
stock plan, 1999 stock plan, 2000 stock plan, 2000 employee stock purchase plan
and 2000 director option plan, of our report dated January 29, 2001 (except as
to Note 12, as to which the date is March 21, 2001), with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of New Focus Inc. included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                                            /s/Ernst & Young LLP
San Jose, California
March 28, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          13,012
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (16,171)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,582
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           7,328
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,356)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 135,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         49,175
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,834
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   135,183
<SALES>                                        109,262
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               110,803
<CGS>                                           89,779
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,823
<INCOME-TAX>                                       904
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,919
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,919
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John V. Winfield, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of The InterGroup
Corporation

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 24, 2006                          /s/ John V. Winfield
                                              ---------------------------
                                              John V. Winfield, President
                                              and Chief Executive Officer
#### Hays et al. *v.*Johns.

*Practice.—Assignment of Error.—“ On the*Transcript.”—When there is no assignment of errors “ on the transcript,” as required by section 568, 2 G. & H. 275, the appeal will be dismissed on motion of appellee, although such assignment be made upon a detached paper among the papers in the case.

*506APPEAL from the Vigo Common Pleas. •'

*R. Dunnigan,*for appellants.

*M. M. Ray, G. H. Voss, B. F. Davis,*and V. *A. Holman,*for appellee.

Worden, J.

In this case there is no assignment of errors “ on the transcript,” as required by the statute. 2 G. & H. 275, sec. 568. There is among the papers filed in the cause what purports to be an abstract of the record, and on this paper there is an assignment of error. It was clearly intended that errors should be assigned, in the language of the statute, “ on the transcript,” and not on loose and detached pieces of paper. A motion which the appellee has filed to dismiss the appeal for the want of a proper assignment of error must be sustained.

The appeal is dismissed, with costs.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1874 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of 

Representatives, Republican Conference for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House 

of Representatives, Republican Conference for fiscal year 

2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, REPUBLICAN 

5 CONFERENCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:44 Apr 13, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1874.IH H1874

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1874 IH

1 able for House of Representatives, Republican Conference 

2 for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $2,186,819. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
##### 



Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Internet Initiative Japan Inc., a Japanese corporation
(the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2003, as amended (the
Report), of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October
8, 2003

/s/
    Koichi SuzukiName:
Title:
    
    Koichi Suzuki
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Representative Director






---



##### 



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Internet Initiative Japan Inc., a Japanese corporation
(the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2003, as amended (the
Report), of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 8, 2003

/s/
    Yasuhiro NishiName:
Title:
    
    Yasuhiro Nishi
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1868 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1868

   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, 
               Official Mail Costs for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, 
               Official Mail Costs for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR SENATE, OFFICIAL 
              MAIL COSTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Senate, Official Mail 
Costs for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $300,000.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David K. Spohr, Vice President and Director of Fund Administration of the Managing Owner, Preferred
Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor Trust II  Series F (Series F), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | Series Fs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series F.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David K. Spohr                                
|David K. Spohr                                    
|Vice President and Director of Fund Administration
|March 31, 2006
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 25, 2010

0517 

# Order

May 25, 2010

140252

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140252 COA: 292447 Wayne CC: 05-007334 ANTHONY LYNN RANDALL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 28, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-4043

___________

Carl M. Jones, April D. Jones, *

*

Appellants, *

*

v. *

*

ISP Minerals, Inc., * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Appellee, * Eastern District of Missouri.

* [UNPUBLISHED]

v. *

*

Brockmiller Construction, Inc., *

*

Third Party Defendant. *

___________

Submitted: May 8, 2000

Filed: June 6, 2000

___________

Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

ISP Minerals, Inc., contracted with Brockmiller Construction, Inc., to have the

latter perform a construction job. Brockmiller employees, including Carl Jones,

performed the work on ISP's property. During the construction, Jones fell through a

skylight and was injured. He sought and received workers' compensation. He also
1

 The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

-2-

brought this claim against ISP, and his wife April Jones brought a related lossof-consortium claim. The District Court1

 granted summary judgment to ISP, applying

the Missouri rule that prohibits an employee of an independent contractor from

recovering against a landowner for injuries sustained while working at a jobsite under

the possession and control of the contractor. See Matteuzzi v. Columbus Partnership,

L.P., 866 S.W.2d 128, 132 (Mo. 1993). The Joneses appeal and we affirm.

The Joneses rely on Mullins v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 143 F.3d 1153 (8th Cir.

1998), where an independent contractor's employee slipped and fell while away from

the jobsite on his lunch break. Because the independent contractor did not have control

over the area where the employee was injured, we allowed the employee's premises

liability claim against the landowner to go forward. See id. at 1159. In this case, when

Jones fell, he was at the jobsite performing work duties under specific instructions from

his employer, and thus his fall was a risk "inherent in the contracted work," not

"unrelated to the contracted work and within the exclusive control of the landowner."

Id. Mullins is therefore inapplicable. Since ISP did not control the details of the work

project, ISP may not be held liable for Jones's injuries. See Matteuzzi, 866 S.W.2d at

132. 

The Joneses' other contentions are meritless, and further discussion of these state

law issues is unnecessary. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                            MENDOCINO PARTNERS, INC.
                            (a Delaware corporation)


         MENDOCINO  PARTNERS,  INC., a corporation  organized and existing under
and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware:

         DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         1. The following  resolution has been unanimously  adopted by the board
of directors and a majority of the stockholders of the Corporation in accordance
with  Section 242 of the  Delaware  General  Corporation  Law for the purpose of
amending the corporation's Certificate of Incorporation.  The resolution setting
forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

         RESOLVED,  that the Certificate of  Incorporation of the Corporation be
         amended by changing the Article  thereof  numbered  "FIRST" so that, as
         amended, said Article shall be and read as follows:

         FIRST: The name of the corporation is California Service Stations, Inc.

         2.  That  said  amendment  was  duly  adopted  in  accordance  with the
provisions  of  Section  242 of the  General  Corporation  Law of the  State  of
Delaware.

         IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  MENDOCINO  PARTNERS,  INC..  has  caused  this
  certificate  to be  signed by its duly
authorized officer, this 20th day of July, 2004.


MENDOCINO PARTNERS, INC.




Jehu Hand, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
---

Exhibit 32.2


MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)




The undersigned, Susan E. Knight, the Chief Financial Officer of MTS Systems Corporation (the "Company"), has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2010 (the "Report").




The undersigned hereby certifies that:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.




Date: November 30, 2010





/s/ SUSAN E. KNIGHTSusan E. Knight

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer