alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           841501
<NAME>                          Owens Mortgage Investment Fund
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1.00
<CASH>                          10,028,067
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   2,200,827
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          13,117,441
<DEPRECIATION>                  51,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  241,975,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,622,841
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                      234,211,387
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    241,975,151
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                9,556,144
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,608,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              93,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 7,776,861
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             4,897,594
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 2,879,267
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    7,776,861
<EPS-BASIC>                     .034
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .034




</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.01**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-147975, 333-145742, 333-113899, 333-110248, 333-77068, 333-68342 and 33-46624) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-142745, 333-136705, 333-113914, 333-104711, 333-64552, 333-59842, 333-55822, 333-35730, 333-32460,333-93591, 333-92159 and 333-87505) of Kana Software, Inc. of our reports dated March 17, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting(which expresses an adverse opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness), which appear in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP 

San Jose, California 

March 17, 2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7750

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SIXTO MARCELINO GARCIA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CR-98-87, CA-01-332-5-BO)

Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 11, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sixto Marcelino Garcia, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Sixto Marcelino Garcia seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. United States v. Garcia, Nos. CR-98-87; CA-01-

332-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 3.1(a)

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

TO THE CHARTER OF

MONONGAHELA POWER COMPANY

Joseph H. Richardson, President, and Thomas C. Sheppard,
Jr., Assistant Secretary, of Monongahela Power Company, an Ohio Corporation (the Corporation), do hereby certify that on November 8th, 2005 the following resolutions were adopted in a writing approved and signed as specified in
Section 1701.54 of the Revised Code of Ohio:

RESOLVED, that the second paragraph of subdivision (1) of
Section 1.5 of the Charter of the Corporation is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

90,000
shares of the Cumulative Preferred Stock shall be a series of said Cumulative Preferred Stock designated as the 4.40% Cumulative Preferred Stock; 40,000 shares of the Cumulative Preferred Stock shall be a series of the Cumulative Preferred Stock
designated as the 4.80% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series B; 60,000 shares of the Cumulative Preferred Stock shall be a series of the Cumulative Preferred Stock designated as the 4.50% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series C; 50,000 shares of the
Cumulative Preferred Stock shall be a series of the Cumulative Preferred Stock designated as the $6.28 Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series D; and 1,260,000 shares of the Cumulative Preferred Stock shall be authorized but unissued shares of which
1,200,000 shares represent previously redeemed Cumulative Preferred Stock which may hereafter be reclassified and reissued by the Board of Directors in the same manner as any other authorized and unissued shares of Cumulative Preferred Stock.

AND FURTHER RESOLVED, that paragraph C of subdivision (4) of Section 1.5 of the Charter of the Corporation is
hereby deleted, cancelled and removed from said Charter.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Joseph H. Richardson, President, and Thomas C. Sheppard, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary, of Monongahela Power Company, acting for and on behalf of the Corporation, have hereunto subscribed their names and caused the seal of the Corporation to be affixed this 8th day of November, of 2005.



|                 |  |                           |  |                            
|---------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|                 |  | MONONGAHELA POWER COMPANY
|                 |  |                          
|                 |  | By:                       |  | /s/ Joseph H. Richardson   
|                 |  |                           |  | President                  
|                 |  |                          
|[CORPORATE SEAL] |  | By:                       |  | /s/ Thomas C. Sheppard, Jr.
|                 |  |                           |  | Assistant Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1823 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1823

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2024

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 207 East Fort Dade Avenue in Brooksville, Florida, as the 
   ``Specialist Justin Dean Coleman Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST JUSTIN DEAN COLEMAN MEMORIAL POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 207 East Fort Dade Avenue in Brooksville, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Specialist Justin Dean Coleman Memorial 
Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Justin Dean Coleman Memorial Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
10871.

#### Cochran *v.*Meeks, *et al.*

Jenkins, P. J.

This was a suit to recover back the purchase-price paid for a number of bales of cotton, the plaintiff contending that in his purchase he was defrauded by reason of the seller’s false and fraudulent substitution of samples, on the basis of which the purchase was made. The plaintiff alleged that promptly upon discovering the fraud he offered to restore the property to the defendant, and that he held it as the property of the defendant, for the use and benefit and subject to the order of the defendant. Held:

1. While a mere “breach of warranty does not annul an executed sale, but gives the purchaser a right to damages where the contract price has been fully paid; or he may plead in abatement of the purchase-money when sued therefor” *(Pound*v. *Williams,*119 *Ga.*904 (47 S. E. 218) ; Civil Code of 1910, § 4136), still, if the sale has been induced by fraudulent representations on the part of the seller as to existing conditions, a contract may be rescinded at the instance of the purchaser, upon his promptly restoring or offering to restore the property received by virtue of the contract; and, upon this being done, the purchaser, without taking any independent proceeding in equity to rescind the contract, is entitled to recover the amount of the purchase-price actually paid by him. Civil Code (1910), §§ 4305, 4306; *Fudge*v. *Kelly,*4 *Ga. App.*630 (62 S. E. 96); 39 Cyc. 1997 (b). The demurrer to the petition was properly overruled.

2. The evidence objected to in the first special ground of the motion for a new trial was admissible, in connection with other testimony in the case, as tending to throw light on the main contention of the plaintiff; the evidence of the plaintiff objected to in the second and fourth special grounds of the motion was inadmissible as being hearsay, but since the same fact was testified to by the person thus quoted, and the letter quoted from was afterwards itself introduced, a new trial will not be granted on these grounds. *Daughtry*v. *Savannah &c. Railway Co.,*1 *Ga. App.*393 (3) (58 S. E. 230). The evidence objected to in the third special ground was admissible as a part of the history of the transaction; but even if it were irrelevant, it could not have been harmful to the defendant.

3. The excerpts from the charge of the court complained of in the sixth and seventh special grounds of the motion for a new trial, in which were given certain principles of law relative to fraud as embodied in the code, were not erroneous, but were applicable to the case.

4. The portions of the charge complained of in the eighth and ninth *62special grounds of the motion do not afford ground for a new trial, since the plaintiff, if entitled to recover at all, was entitled to recover the full amount sued for.

Decided March 11, 1920.

Action of deceit; from city court of Waycross — H. M. Wilson, judge pro hac vice. April 28, 1919.

*A. E. Cochran, W. A. Milton,*for plaintiff in error.

*Parker & Parker, A. B. Spence,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.*
EXHIBIT
32





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Bay National Corporation
(the “Company”) each certifies that to the best of his knowledge the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and the information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/Hugh
W. Mohler





Hugh W.
Mohler


President
and Chief Executive Officer


March 31,
2010








/s/ David
E. Borowy





David E.
Borowy


Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


March 31,
2010





This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is
not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document,
and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any reason other
than as specifically required by law.












126
#### George W. Guiley v. Susannah Guiley.

Appeal from Saginaw.

Submitted June 30.

Decided July 1.

Bill for divorce. Complainant appeals.

Beversed and decree granted.

*John E. Nolan*for complainant.

*Albert Trask*for defendant.

Graves, J.

Without going into any discussion of the facts it is sufficient to observe that the case made by the proof entitled the complainant in our opinion to a decree.

The decree below will therefore be reversed and one entered granting the divorce prayed for.

The other Justices concurred.
DISMISS ; Opinion issued April 18, 2013 

# S

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 12

- 00870

- CV

BRAD HAWKINS , Appellant V. TODD SEALE , Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416

- 05046

- 2010

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang

- Miers and Lewis Opinion by Chief Justice Wright

By letter dated June 26, 2012, the Court informed appellant that the $175 filing fee was

past due. We instructed appellant to pay the filing fee within ten days and cautioned appellant

that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. On July 17,

2012, the Court granted appellant a ten

- day extension of time to pay the filing fee. As of today’s

date, appellant has not paid the filing fee. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

.

P. 42.3(c).

120870F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE1200870.R.docx

– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

BRAD HAWKINS, Appellant

No. 05

- 12

- 00870

- CV V.

TODD SEALE, Appellee On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416

- 050 46

- 2010. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang

- Miers and Lewis participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

It is ORDERED that appellee, TODD SEALE, recover his costs of this appeal from appellant, BRAD HAWKINS.

Judgment entered April 18, 2013.

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 172 

To provide for no net increase in the total acreage of certain Federal land 

under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management, the National 

Park Service, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, or the Forest 

Service, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. GRIFFITH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for no net increase in the total acreage of certain 

Federal land under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of 

Land Management, the National Park Service, the 

United States Fish and Wildlife Service, or the Forest 

Service, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Acre In, Acre Out 

5 Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 172 IH

1 SEC. 2. NO NET INCREASE IN CERTAIN FEDERAL LANDS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—For acquisition of land by the 

3 Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture 

4 that would result in a net increase of total land acreage 

5 under the jurisdiction of the National Park Service, the 

6 United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of 

7 Land Management, or the Forest Service, the Secretary 

8 concerned shall offer for sale an equal number of acres 

9 of Federal land that is under the same jurisdictional sta10 tus. 

11 (b) EXEMPTIONS.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to 

12 easements acquired— 

13 (1) by the Secretary of the Interior to facilitate 

14 management of Federal lands; or 

15 (2) by the Secretary of Agriculture to facilitate 

16 management of Federal lands. 

17 (c) CONSIDERATION.— 

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—Land sold pursuant to sub19 section (a) shall be offered for sale— 

20 (A) at fair market value (based on local 

21 comparable sales); and 

22 (B) at a price that is reduced by 10 per23 cent each month if the land is not sold or under 

24 contract to be sold by the date that is 6 months 

25 after the land was first offered for sale. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 172 IH

1 (2) EXCEPTION.—Time periods during which 

2 land is under contract for sale or withdrawn from 

3 the market shall not be counted for the purposes of 

4 price reduction under paragraph (1)(B). 

5 (d) EXISTING RIGHTS.—The sale of Federal lands 

6 pursuant to this section shall be subject to valid existing 

7 rights. 

8 (e) PROCEEDS OF SALE OF LANDS.—All net proceeds 

9 from the sale of Federal lands pursuant to this section 

10 shall be deposited directly into the Treasury for reduction 

11 of the public debt. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72175-72176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28726]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Maritime Commission.

TIME AND DATE:  December 10, 2014; 11:00 a.m.

PLACE:  800 N Capitol Street NW., First Floor Hearing Room, Washington, 
DC.

STATUS: The first portion of the meeting will be held in Open Session; 
the second in Closed Session.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Open Session

    1. Briefing on European Maritime Law Organization's (EMLO) 
Conference.
    2. Briefing on South Atlantic Port Forum held October 30th 
Concerning Causes and Implications of Congestion at U.S. Ports.
    3. Briefing on Gulf Coast Port Forum held November 3rd Concerning 
Causes and Implications of Congestion at U.S. Ports.

[[Page 72176]]

Closed Session

    1. Staff Briefing Concerning International Affairs.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, 
(202) 523 5725.

 Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-28726 Filed 12-3-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### A. Boyd, et al., *v.*A. D. Thomas, et al.

Appeal — Limitations Presented by Plea.

The three years limitation which bars an appeal to this court must be presented by a plea and cannot be made available by being incorporated into a brief.

Time to File Plea.

The Court of Appeals on its own motion may give appellee time in which to file a plea of the limitations barring an appeal after three years.

APPEAL PROM BATH CIRCUIT COURT.

March 24, 1875.

*Nesbitt & Gudgell, for appellants. Reid &*Stone, *for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

■ The three years limitation that bars an appeal to this court must be presented by plea. It cannot properly be incorporated into a brief, and thereby made available. The manner in which it is here presented does not seem to be objected to by appellant, but as the record of the case does not show that the statute was pleaded, we cannot assume that appellant has waived his right to object.

The court, of its own motion, sets aside the hearing, to give appellees an opportunity to file a plea in case they desire to do so. The case will remain open until the ioth of April, when it will be again submitted.
H. R. 1823 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 207 East 

Fort Dade Avenue in Brooksville, Florida, as the ‘‘Specialist Justin Dean Coleman 

Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST JUSTIN DEAN COLEMAN MEMORIAL POST 

OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 207 East Fort Dade Avenue in Brooksville, 

Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Specialist Justin 

Dean Coleman Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Specialist Justin Dean Coleman Memorial Post Office 

Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         329,776
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  656,805
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,464)
<INVENTORY>                                    531,408
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,568,854
<PP&E>                                         1,682,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,062,527)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,513,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,145,526
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,791,590
<OTHER-SE>                                     (953,483)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   838,107
<SALES>                                        1,340,383
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,340,383
<CGS>                                          885,789
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  885,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               432,674
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             584
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                21,919
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9,210
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            12,709
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   12,709
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00
        

</TABLE>