alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY>U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          10,748
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                       206
<INVENTORY>                                     14,034
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,033
<PP&E>                                          16,305
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,183
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,849
<BONDS>                                          4,756
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            79
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,109
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,450
<SALES>                                         71,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,603
<CGS>                                           42,810
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,810
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,385
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,227
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,158
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,158
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LATOYA SEALS WEBB, : 

 :

Plaintiff, : 

 :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0270-CG-B

 :

CUNA MUTUAL GROUP, a/k/a CUNA :

MUTUAL SOCIETY, :

 :

Defendant. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge made under 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

The plaintiff’s motion to remand this action to the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama

(Doc. 25) is hereby DENIED. 

DONE and ORDERED this 22nd day of January, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00270-CG-B Document 35 Filed 01/22/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

                              CNB BANCORP, INC.

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CNB Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William N.
Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



By /s/ William N. Smith
-----------------------------------------
William N. Smith, Chief Executive Officer
August 10, 2005
**Exhibit31.3**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Mark E. Wilson, ChiefAccounting Officer of EXCO Resources, Inc., certify that:

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Qof EXCO Resources, Inc.;

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.                                      The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.                                      The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

 
| Date:  November 6, 2007 | /s/ MARK E. WILSON       |   |
|------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                         | Mark E. Wilson           |
|                         | Chief Accounting Officer |

 

1

----
#### Elizabeth Page v. Robert B. Montgomery et al.

*Bill to dear title*— Possession *neaessa/ry.*

A bill to clear title cannot be maintained if at the time of filing it the complainant is not in actual possession of the premises, and especially if a suit at law is pending to settle the right of possession.

Appeal from Ingham.

Submitted Apr. 8.

Decided Apr. 13.

Bill to clear title.

Dismissal of bill affirmed.

*Gibson & Parkinson*for complainant.

*H. P. Henderson*and *M. V.*& *R. A. Montgomery*for defendants.

Marston, C. J.

*~We*shall not enter upon any discussion of the merits in this case as we find, objections fatal to the complainant’s obtaining the relief sought, in a court of chancery.

It appears and is not disputed that the complainant was not in possession of the premises at the time of filing her bill of complaint, and that one of the defendants was in actual possession, and it also appears that a suit was actually pending in the circuit court to settle the'right of possession, and that the same is still pending and undetermined. The complainant has therefore a remedy at law and should pursue it.

The decree dismissing the bill will be affirmed with costs, but so modified as to be without prejudice.

The other Justices concurred.
Exhibit 23.3

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. for the year ended November 30, 2009 of our report dated March 20, 2008, with respect to the financial statements of CPPC-Decorative
Products Co., Ltd., included in Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. for the year ended November 30, 2007.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | 1. | Registration Statement No. 333-155731 on Form S-3 of OMNOVA Solutions Inc.;
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Registration Statement No. 333-162305 on Form S-8 pertaining to the OMNOVA Solutions Inc. Second Amended and Restated 1999 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan;
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Registration Statement No. 333-160509 on Form S-8 pertaining to the OMNOVA Solutions Retirement Savings Plan;
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | Registration Statement No. 333-100558 on Form S-8 pertaining to the OMNOVA Solutions Inc. Amended and Restated 1999 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 5. | Registration Statement No. 333-88145 on Form S-8 pertaining to the OMNOVA Solutions Inc. 1999 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 6. | Registration Statement No. 333-34938 on Form S-8 pertaining to the OMNOVA Solutions Retirement Savings Plan;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 7. | Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-34938 on Form S-8 pertaining to the OMNOVA Solutions Retirement Savings Plan;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated March 20, 2008, with respect to the financial statements of CPPC-Decorative Products Co., Ltd.,
incorporated herein by reference and included in Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. for the year ended November 30, 2007.

/s/ Ernst & Young Office Limited

Bangkok, Thailand

January 27, 2010
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Douglas H.Miller, Chief Executive Officer of EXCO Resources, Inc. certify that:

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of EXCO Resources, Inc.;

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
| Date:  May 14, 2007 | /s/ DOUGLAS H. MILLER   |   |
|--------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                     | Douglas H. Miller       |
|                     | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 
 Pursuant
        to
 18
        U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
        Adopted pursuant to
 Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I,
        Greg
        A. LeClaire, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
        of
        ClearOne Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December
        31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
        Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of ClearOne Communications,
        Inc.
 
 
 
 Date:
                  February 11, 2008
              By:
              /s/
                  Greg A. LeClaireGreg
                  A. LeClaireChief
                  Financial Officer
                (Principal
                  Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 A
        signed original of the written statement above required by Section 906 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to ClearOne Communications,
        Inc.
        and will be retained by ClearOne Communications, Inc. and furnished to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 1
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0729

_____________________________

DIEGO DAVID VALDES,

Appellant,

v.

CAPITAL LOAN COMPANY,

WILLIAM J. ABRACZINSKAS,

SANDRA ACOSTA, EJS

CONTRACTING, INC. a 

corporation, and UNIVERSAL 

SURETY OF AMERICA,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Jackson County.

Ana Maria Garcia, Judge.

April 30, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, NORDBY, and LONG, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Diego David Valdes, pro se, Appellant.

H. Matthew Fuqua of Fuqua & Milton, P.A., Marianna, for 

Appellee Capital Loan Company.

No appearance by Appellee EJS Contracting.

No appearance by Appellee Universal Surety of America.

No appearance by Appellee William Z. Abraczinskas.

No appearance by Appellee Sandra Acosta.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN RE: THE MATTER OF TAIRA )

LYNN LIMITED NO. 7, etc., et al., )

PRAYING FOR EXONERATION ) CIVIL ACTION 13-0318-WS-C

FROM OR LIMITATION OF )

LIABILITY ) 

IN RE: THE MATTER OF THE )

COMPLAINT OF KIRBY INLAND )

MARINE, L.P., etc., PETITIONING ) CIVIL ACTION 13-0319-WS-C

FOR EXONERATION FROM OR )

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY )

IN RE: THE MATTER OF THE )

COMPLAINT OF AEP RIVER )

OPERATIONS LLC, etc., et al., )

PRAYING FOR EXONERATION ) CIVIL ACTION 13-0321-WS-C

FROM OR LIMITATION OF )

LIABILITY ) 

) 

ORDER

Certain claimants have filed motions to consolidate these three actions. In 

re: The Matter of Taira Lynn, Doc. 27; In re: The Complaint of Kirby Inland 

Marine, Doc. 40; In re: The Complaint of AEP River Operations, Docs. 31, 33. 

The Court provided all parties ample time to object, and none have done so.

A district court has authority to order consolidation of multiple actions if 

they “involve a common question of law or fact.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a). These 

actions easily meet that requirement.

Consolidation under Rule 42(a) “is permissive and vests a purely 

discretionary power in the district court.” Young v. City of Augusta, 59 F.3d 1160, 

1168 (11th Cir. 1995) (internal quotes omitted). In exercising that discretion, 

district courts must weigh the risk of prejudice and confusion wrought by 

consolidation against the risk of inconsistent rulings on common factual and legal 

Case 1:13-cv-00318-WS-C Document 55 Filed 08/30/13 Page 1 of 2
2

questions; the burden on the parties and the court posed by multiple lawsuits as 

opposed to one; the length of time required to conclude multiple lawsuits as 

opposed to one; and the relative expense of proceeding with separate lawsuits if 

they are not consolidated. Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 776 F.2d 1492, 

1495 (11th Cir. 1985). “District courts in this circuit have been urged to make good 

use of Rule 42(a) ... in order to expedite the trial and eliminate unnecessary 

repetition and confusion.” Young, 59 F.3d at 1169 (internal quotes omitted). 

These considerations, as applied to the posture and allegations of these lawsuits, 

persuade the Court to exercise its discretion in favor of consolidation.

Accordingly, the motions to consolidate are granted. To effectuate 

consolidation, the Clerk is directed to extract documents 1 through 67 in Civil 

Action No. 13-0319-WS-C, and documents 1 through 57 in Civil Action No. 13-

0321-WS-C, and to make those documents a part of the court file in Civil Action 

No. 13-0318-WS-C. Furthermore, the Court finds there is no reason to maintain 

the latter-filed actions as open files, and the Clerk is thus directed to statistically 

close Civil Action No. 13-0319-WS-C and Civil Action No. 13-0321-WS-C. The 

parties are ordered to file all future filings only in Civil Action No. 13-0318-WSC and to include only that case number and style.

DONE and ORDERED this 30th day of August, 2013.

s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00318-WS-C Document 55 Filed 08/30/13 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 Netegrity, Inc.

                            Certification Pursuant To
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Netegrity, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Barry N. Bycoff, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: October 29, 2004                      /s/ Barry N. Bycoff
                                           _____________________________________
                                           Barry N. Bycoff
                                           President, Chief Executive Officer
                                           and Chairman of the Board (Principal
                                           Executive Officer)
<PAGE>





                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SABARNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Century Pacific Tax Credit Housing
Fund-II (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Irwin J. Deutch, Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



/s/ Irwin J. Deutch
-------------------
Irwin J. Deutch
President, Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2003