alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Dexter Dean BARBER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Denise TRIERWEILER, CPA at ICF; Nitin Gosh, CPA at HVC, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-1334.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 9, 2001.

Before NORRIS and COLE, Circuit Judges; HOLSCHUH, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable John D. Holschus, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Dexter Dean Barber appeals a district court judgment that dismissed his civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l). Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Barber filed his complaint in the district court alleging that the two defendant prison accountants improperly took funds from his account after he was ordered to pay for repairs to fixtures following his prisoner disciplinary conviction for destruction of prison property. Plaintiff named defendants in unspecified capacities and sought injunctive relief. The district court dismissed the complaint sua sponte for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff filed a timely notice of appeal.

On appeal, plaintiff reiterates his claim that money improperly was taken from his account and alleges that other property was taken from him as well. In addition, plaintiff has filed myriad motions for miscellaneous relief. Upon de novo review, *see White v. McGinnis,*131 F.3d 593, 595 (6th Cir.1997); *McGore v. Wrigglesworth,*114 F.3d 601, 604 (6th Cir.1997), we affirm the judgment for the reasons stated by the district court in its opinion filed February 29, 2000. Plaintiffs claim is barred by the doctrine announced in *Parratt v. Taylor,*451 U.S. 527, 101 S.Ct. 1908, 68 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981), *overruled in part by Daniels v. Williams,*474 U.S. 327, 106 S.Ct. 662, 88 L.Ed.2d 662 (1986). *See Copeland v. Machulis,*57 F.3d 476, 479 (6th Cir.1995).

Accordingly, plaintiffs pending motions are denied, and the district court’s judgment is affirmed. *See*Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
OFFICIAL BALLOT

AIOGES INITIALS \

REFORM PARTY
PRIMARY ELECTION - AUGUST 8, 2000
ATCHISON COUNTY, MISSOURI

INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS

To vote, darken in the oval(s) completely next to your choice(s), like this:@
lf you tear, deface, or make a mistake and wrongfully mark any ballot, you must return it to the election board and receive a new ballot.

FOR UNITED STATES SENATE
Vote for ONE

C_) MARTIN LINDSTEDT
() HUGH FOLEY
C_) JAMES M. HALL

FOR GOVERNOR
Vote for ONE

C) JOSEPH C. KELLER
C) RICHARD ALLEN KLINE
C) KENT A. BENSON

FOR LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR |
Vote for ONE

(_) GEORGE D. WEBER

FOR SECRETARY OF STATE
Vote for ONE

C) MARVALENE PANKEY
C_) ARNIE C. DIENOFF

FOR STATE TREASURER |
Vote for ONE

() TERRENCE D. (TERRY) FRANK
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Owens Mortgage
Investment Fund, a California Limited Partnership (the "Issuer") for the period
ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, William C. Owens, Chief Executive Officer of
Owens Financial Group, Inc., the General Partner of the Issuer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report containing financial statements of the Issuer fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Issuer.


/s/ William C. Owens

William C. Owens
Chief Executive Officer of Owens Financial Group, Inc., General Partner
August 13, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      17,751,256
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             9,000,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                178,681,907
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    521,494,027
<ALLOWANCE>                                  7,422,578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             737,418,429
<DEPOSITS>                                 641,935,823
<SHORT-TERM>                                34,900,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          6,792,612
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,000,571
<OTHER-SE>                                  52,789,423
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             737,418,429
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             21,070,443
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            5,447,198
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               208,055
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            26,725,696
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          14,112,511
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          15,254,930
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       11,470,766
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  510,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              21,127
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              6,094,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,558,253
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   5,558,253
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,718,253
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.84
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.501
<LOANS-NON>                                    159,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   256,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             6,947,377
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   36,781
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,982
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            7,422,578
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         6,633,741
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        788,837
        

</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4741 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Diresul Brown CR Liquid Crude. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2004 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Diresul Brown CR 

Liquid Crude. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON DIRESUL BROWN CR 

4 LIQUID CRUDE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.35.02 Diresul Brown CR Liquid 

Crude (leuco sulfur dye) 

(provided for in subheading 

3204.19.50) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 4741 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### MUkMdLMlMl

\l. 

## ItatreFVtiihfJ/iLAppaiiA MMTeW 

### TtitiTfireoFTtMS, hppllltt 

### nrTTOni U JkfidnroMij h\ii^ 

### tttld.tJlp.f.kUia) mttm UtMUumm.-x^'XU fsuSTpffippttiM hrtmm k PreTxi)^ M br.^JH£TittiMj hMblTd ktoiUM uhmlku IdM)

~r. tij/? ~xs at.mpun an oF P>n hunts To tueTitm tbttr't Tfrnsmm 

### to rtMifl) jAMism uF Uppuiate: ApPflMlJT: 

### foihtojSmriMM IMmMmMK. M#MM,)idfl#.UWt> P.Utlltm ttn1iPtfiulWH)iio APPeuk: ftWBLMTH HtiLhiHJteL iMJimMrmi. 

### fkMmijJMPAL&MmMl Uhnun RECBVED1N 

### flmuvL^wiiiiii 6QtJFffQF-CBM>NALAPPEALS

DEC 15 2015-AbefAeostarClerkP«fr£i

### Htti tM£S MfoUAltf fafoil/AtlMUt PEftTihdMniEfMftT i)P AmfHiTbk}kEhliix.t DtM£mMj//IPPEflu»lT«£ kmt\koF:

it\) kmuitir foMEtiM mr k< tM<mimr6M fa&ilfiTo Out hum iiiiA DatiED hPPCLUtiT ComtlOfTilAT TliMT/IT£ DFTMtTii THE 1lak$TVTa of htlT<:i>i>! hutltri PitledTo /jumJiJmTo Fm.e fot AtcMell:jn: hMTtTUTroriH iJMtlMEiJT li it) UPPelMT tumpoU hunriM tut k) imtt -nxm mm km (D.) AfPELMTfiUB CoiJTEhlDS TMTMHuMT/ihMllL EfrteM.F. ihrioirr DrCEOT BkbEtitE CtMrFiTaTtt htttlriULE fopfrt Uszb adUm^ dc/Jtejtide AfpELUhiTh FMTixulflfiem \l.trm.Mini.Ul% TiiAx\tiMPMhh^iminii\\bT^kFMMimiuM.tii.-. 

### f.g. hmTT ]/. fr/m, Ilk Ilil.M 0M CUif.tntf.Up. LM) tomtptr html kv, hhkatu \i. arm m,ibi.,u w.ntti.i 

### tram. ^m.i- turn m. a/o m) ntiMr LmtiDt the tputrshMiD UhEtiJ-rtiETtcmcmm \)tTelMri4t}Tad oF httlTU^ tUtUPnA PiFFeMP. tiFltSDUT 

### (ftfiPtHlUEIDHtf^lBW pBhlH-faOE 11.61.DuETi-flU FtlTTMT .THE A9PMtttTF.ttl PwtetiThMiTt PtMf TUTU blii Pea/'ED

Pup ifopm knimi th tm hmriDMirnittFm MitzTuTtoiJ kM IhsJsti TUB fcMTTo FUF Ffr$ AtMEM)



### m%

### htuutfT toriCLUMJ TtiHTTiJ ttJe tfltrref! HatutitrFqhtH m PrffiiohicF'bxscdmoMM'kite/Jig nhn itnrBsrrmi v. ImMMmmm nm j\M. \\-t>o,u it: tv the ii^judikjildTSTftfT PiHUT hit llkmsttl CpMTi/TeM- IME hllM-MUM t>j tupSts/th NuatoFAppeals tJUfUieJ/J-nnTTVE Cduatof hpptiU fititxiLdIrRktiT fcs DeTxFtqiJdue to fmtoFDiiz Pums 

### \f6S DefiedTttttT3l tFseiFts Mum To DeiJj/tHe APP~elMTA FktP Tmi.teEJM, httiTrTuTrtiii lVkhEnlMEt4TRiMTj)fiL$6 Mv. htMFill EPUH kH -MUtMDxtTroMj) 

### htM 

## hpiHfTTtitTH( LITE htEPTtatitiFTliEtitTll tlUHTDF UpPMlS' UltnOti^UF To l\ tMtti}F0Fht)tlPJ5i JEMftDEtED TfM DMDInjE.i M\iu FHiuntm dPidm filmof$a twftFIti hihmotlU UUPSFD A kit) kdfrPMtiTflEflMflEdTf} to1 FaM,WttUe Ujxfrd U hmm kt) f\ tJEiJ-nttRL ktttiTEuM FonuUnit ktikMFi Uv-tiF 71 m-tii APPiLLkdrMUl ENTITLED. 

### tmnrMutooM 

### 1m(eP\I P,m^m ICIWUMT IDDO loDUctoMLtittmil SMEpsftTM WWI6



### PWE

# [eptxFtchtfoffjf.d\ltct Tfr# TiTdCfMiF/Shl DettMElHriMlsA Ifi/EAdDfoet&T POpl/ OfTIF FMOXilf, feTxTTOAi MAppum 'hott* lis kiti JWlDEfl Mlli nixi oti All hmiStL ofHecoPQAmTiTecested P/H?T|f LtfFED kLBI/J :



### MiUML ItekMJswML UMiMin tt>(E\lEptllTUtJiSxMt\ 1II31-HI0
faun oFMimx^l Appeals U.Uvuoi 

### MMJMmJIIIL 'iuMlK X 

### /FppELUUJr'PPojE II



### 4
#### William L. Andrews v. Charles Fillmore.

*Chattel mortgage*— Validity *as against execution oreditor.*

A chattel mortgage in fraud of an execution creditor is nevertheless valid if given to secure an honest debt and taken in good faith.

Error to Macomb.

Submitted June 15.

Decided June 22.

Trespass on the case. . Plaintiff brings error.

Reversed.

*Irving D. Hanscom*for plaintiff in error.

A conveyance is not void as to creditors unless both parties participate in the fraudulent purpose in giving and taking it: Herm. Chat. Mort. § 104.

*Dwight N. Lowell*and *Crocker & Hutchins*for defendant in error.

*316Graves, J.

Andrews held a chattel mortgage from one Stoddard on certain personal property, and Fillmore being a deputy sheriff seized the property on execution against the mortgagor and sold it. Andrews then sued in trover and on the trial the case turned upon the validity of the mortgage as against creditors.

The verdict was for the defendant. A charge was requested to the effect that although it should appear that the object of the mortgagor was fraudulent as to creditors, yet if it also appeared that the mortgage was made to secure an honest debt it would be valid unless the fraudulent purpose of the mortgagor was participated in by the mortgagee. The circuit judge refused to give the instruction, and ruled substantially that if the intent of the mortgagor was fraudulent as against the execution creditor, the mortgage, though given for an honest debt and received by the mortgagee in perfect good faith, could not be sustained against the execution.

In this there was error. The plaintiff was entitled to the instruction prayed for: *State Bank v. Chapelle*40 Mich. 441; *People v. Bristol*35 Mich. 28; *Adams v. Niemann*ante p. 135.

The judgment is reversed with costs and a new trial granted.

The other Justices concurred.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                      COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
              For the years ended December 31, 1998, 1999 and 2000
                (In thousands, except share and per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              Year ended December 31,
                                                                   1998               1999              2000
                                                               -----------        -----------        -----------
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE (1):
<S>                                                          <C>                <C>                <C>
  Net Loss                                                     $    (3,440)       $   (30,201)       $   (27,271)
                                                               ===========        ===========        ===========

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (2)        13,081,500         14,756,339         20,359,074
                                                               -----------        -----------        -----------

Basic and diluted net loss per share                           $     (0.26)       $     (2.05)       $     (1.34)
                                                               ===========        ===========        ===========

</TABLE>

(1)  Diluted net loss per share is equal to basic net loss per share since
     potential common shares from the exercise of stock options and warrants are
     antidilutive.

(2)  The number of shares used to compute the loss per share amounts includes
     13,081,500 shares of Class B common stock issued in connection with the
     Company's initial capitalization in June 1999, as if all shares were
     outstanding for the entire periods presented.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350
                             (FURNISHED, NOT FILED)






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Black Warrior Wireline Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald
Whitter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Ronald Whitter
    --------------



Ronald Whitter
Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MICHAEL HELLER,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 

BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 322 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of December, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                             850
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                        98
<INVENTORY>                                      1,073
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,134
<PP&E>                                          26,619
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,168
<BONDS>                                         17,585
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,410
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,508)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,625
<SALES>                                         30,015
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,383
<CGS>                                           15,545
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (318)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,799
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    933
<INCOME-TAX>                                        54
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                879
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,007
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,886
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.72
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTIONS

Appellate case name: Ex parte Patricio Estrada

Appellate case number: 01-18-00792-CR

Trial court case number: 17-DCR-077572

Trial court: 268th District Court of Fort Bend County

Appellant, Patricio Estrada, timely filed a pro se notice of appeal on September 4, 

2018, from the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law denying his motion for 

a pretrial writ of habeas corpus and order, signed on August 19, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P.

26.2(a)(1). On September 11, 2018, appellant filed a “Motion for Out-of-Time Appeal” in 

this Court seeking an extension of time to file his notice of appeal from the denial of his 

habeas application. The Court dismisses as moot appellant’s motion for an extension of 

time to file his notice of appeal because it was timely filed.

On September 21, 2018, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed in this Court 

containing the trial court’s certification that appellant has a right of appeal of the denial of 

his habeas application. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1. This record also included the 

trial court’s September 21, 2018 Order for Competency Evaluation ordering that appellant 

be evaluated by a psychologist who shall issue a written report determining whether he is 

competent to stand trial.

On September 25, 2018, appellant filed this pro se “Motion for Emergency Stay

Pending Appeal of Pretrial Habeas Corpus” requesting that this Court stay the criminal trial

that is set from October 1-8, 2018, pending this Court’s resolution of his appeal. 

Accordingly, after reviewing the motion and the record, specifically concluding that 

the competency evaluation will likely delay the trial anyway, the Court DENIES

appellant’s motion for an emergency stay. Finally, after reviewing all the records, the 

Court determines that it does not desire briefing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 31.1.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: September 28, 2018 ______________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       6
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
March 31, 2000 Form 10-Q Balance  Sheets and  Statements  of  Operations  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                     34,696
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                    33,392
<RECEIVABLES>                                256
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                 7
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            33,655
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                       0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                        0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    170
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                          170
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                       0
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                        222
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        222
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                      0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                         0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                        0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                       0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                  (1,924)
<NET-ASSETS>                              33,485
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                              0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                            780
<OTHER-INCOME>                               146
<EXPENSES-NET>                               316
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      610
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                       0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                      0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                        610
<EQUALIZATION>                                 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                      0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                          0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                        0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                    0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                            0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                       610
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                        0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                      0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                        0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                     0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        166
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              316
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                      33,180
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                     146.74
<PER-SHARE-NII>                             2.26
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                        0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                           0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                      0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                           0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                       149.00
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                            0.010


</TABLE>