alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Monongahela Power Company
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,826
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  166,322
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,133
<INVENTORY>                                     38,176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               232,219
<PP&E>                                       2,173,603
<DEPRECIATION>                                 958,867
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,693,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          245,003
<BONDS>                                        503,741<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     74,000
<COMMON>                                       294,550
<OTHER-SE>                                     284,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,693,718
<SALES>                                        673,335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               673,355
<CGS>                                          409,558
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  513,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,888
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                132,767
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,440
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             92,327
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    92,327
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Includes $2,561 for funds on deposit with trustees.
<F2>All common stock is owned by parent, no EPS required.
</FN>



</TABLE>
#### Rachel Unger, plaintiff, *vs.*The Forty- Second Street, &c. Railroad Company, defendants.

Where,.after service of the summons and complaint, the defendants stay the plaintiff’s proceedings until the costs of a former suit are paid, the defendants cannot move, under section 274 of the Code of Procedure, to dismiss the complaint, if the costs have not been paid, and the stay is still in force.

(Before Moseii, ¿T. at special term,

April, 1866.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09

- 13

- 00 3 39

- CR

________________

RAY EARNEST A/K/A RAY ERNEST MINGO A/K/A EARNEST RAY

MINGO A/K/A ERNEST RAY MINGO , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 11

- 11528

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Ray Earnest a/k/a Ernest Mingo a/k/a Earnest Ray Mingo a/k/a

Ernest Ray Mingo filed a motion to dismiss his appeal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P.

42.2. The motion is signed by appellant personally after counsel filed a brief which

certifies that counsel could find no arguable error upon which to base an appeal.

We therefore treat the motion to dismiss the appeal as agreed to by counsel. See

Tex. R. App. 42.2. No opinion has issued in this appeal.2 It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED, and the

appeal is therefore DISMISSED.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

______________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN

C hief Justice

Opinion Delivered January 15, 2014

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson

, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>            1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                          7392
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   4669
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     6998
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                20990
<PP&E>                          19028
<DEPRECIATION>                  14542
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  25476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           3360
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        14129
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      7928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    25476
<SALES>                         27259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                27259
<CGS>                           16709
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   23455
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 3796
<INCOME-TAX>                    1339
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             2457
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    2457
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .62
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6192

ANDRE FLENNARD JONES EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WARDEN COMMANDING OFFICER, Sheriff; SERGEANT BONNES, Medical Department Director, Medical Director Sheriff; DONNA MAYNE, Medical Director, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-01-34-2) Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre Flennard Jones El, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Andre Flennard Jones El appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones El v. Warden , No. CA-01-34-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 87-1154.

#### Wilson *v.*Tennessee.

Ct. Crim. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.
1

| Vesting Schedule: | [__of the shares vest one year after the Vesting Commencement Date; the balance of the shares vest in a series of __  successive equal monthly installments measured from the first anniversary of the Vesting Commencement Date.] |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Payment: | By one or a combination of the following items (described in the Option Agreement): |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | £ By cash or check |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | £ By bank draft or money order payable to the Company |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | £ Pursuant to a Regulation T Program if the Shares are publicly traded |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | £ By delivery of already-owned shares if the Shares are publicly traded |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | £ If and only to the extent this option is a Nonstatutory Stock Option, and subject to the Company’s consent at the time of exercise, by a “net exercise” arrangement2 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

 

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----
| William C. Owens as Chief Executive Officer and President of Owens Financial Group, Inc., the General Partner of Owens Mortgage Investment Fund, a California Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”), and Bryan H. Draper, as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Owens Financial Group, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that: |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  (1) | the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1855 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Office of 

the Chaplain for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for 

Senate, Office of the Chaplain for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 SENATE, OFFICE OF THE CHAPLAIN FOR FIS5 CAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Senate, Office of the Chaplain for fiscal year 2024 

9 may not exceed $474,886. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

 ) 

LEE HENRY McGREW, ) 

 ) 

Plaintiff/ Counter-Defendant, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-0646-CG-M 

 ) 

CHOCTAW COUNTY COMMISSION, ) 

 ) 

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. ) 

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

In accordance with the court=s order entered this date, it is hereby ORDERED, 

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that default judgment is entered against counter-defendant Lee 

Henry McGrew and in favor of counter-plaintiff Choctaw County Commission in the amount 

of $20,902.77, plus attorneys fees and costs. 

DONE and ORDERED this 21st day of June, 2010. 

 

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:08-cv-00646-CG-M Document 98 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 1
#### John H. Miller *v.*Jacob H. Miller.

Suit to Prevent the Use of Name.

Where two persons in the same business have the same name, the court cannot compel one of them to change his sign or name.

APPEAL FROM McCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT.

September 11, 1874.

*Bigger & Moss, for appellant.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

The facts alleged do not indicate that appellee, in preparing his sign, attempted to simulate to that of appellant. They are not identical, but as dissimilar as they reasonably could be, in view of the fact that the initials of the Christian names, and the surnames of the parties are the same, and that they are engaged in the same occupation. A person seeking the place of business of appellant would be much more likely to be deceived by the identity of their surnames, than by the similarity of the residue of their signs. Therefore, to afford appellant the relief he seeks, it would be necessary to require appellee to change his name or his occupation, which is wholly beyond the power of the court.

The judgment must be *affirmed.*
#### RED LAKE BAND OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS, Appellant, v. STATE OF MINNESOTA et al., Appellees.

No. 79-1420.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 15, 1980.

Decided Jan. 31, 1980.

*1162Rodney J. Edwards, Edwards, Edwards & Bodin, Duluth, Minn., for appellant.

James M. Schoessler, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept, of Natural Resources, St. Paul, Minn., for appellee; Warren R. Spannaus, Atty. Gen., C. Paul Faraci, Deputy Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Minn., on brief.

Tom Tobin, Tobin Law Offices, Winner, S. D., for intervenors.-appellees; Aurel L. Ekvall, Clearwater County Atty., Bagley, Minn., William W. Shakely and David Albert Mustone, Washington, D. C., on brief.

Before ROSS and HENLEY, Circuit Judges, and PORTER, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Donald J. Porter, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

The Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians appeals from the decision of the district court1 in which its claims of hunting, fishing, trapping, and wild rice gathering rights in approximately 2.6 million acres of land in the state of Minnesota were denied.

This dispute arises out of the circumstances surrounding the Band’s cession of two parcels of land to the federal government in 1889 and 1904,2 and specifically whether any of the above-mentioned rights in the land were retained. Since the time the land was ceded to the government, the state of Minnesota has exercised full jurisdiction over Indians in the territory, including the regular enforcement of state gaming laws against members of the Red Lake Band. The Band seeks now to free its members of the state’s control, by contending that its grant of rights, title and interest in the land to the United States did not include hunting, fishing, trapping and wild rice gathering rights. We disagree.

We have reviewed the applicable case law, the briefs of the parties and the record before us on appeal. We agree with the district court’s conclusion that the Red Lake Band gave up its rights to hunt, fish, trap and gather wild rice free of the state’s regulation of such activities. We would like also to point out that our disposition of this case in no way conflicts with our recent decision in *United States v. Dupris,*612 F.2d 319 (8th Cir., 1979), wherein we found no clear congressional intent to diminish the boundaries of the reservation there in question. In the present appeal, the boundaries of the reservation were clearly diminished. The Band claims, however, that even so, its rights to fish and hunt pursuant to prior treaties were not abrogated. Again, we disagree and we affirm on the basis of the trial court’s well reasoned decision of March 28, 1979.

1

. The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, the Honorable Edward J. Devitt, Chief Judge.

2

. Pursuant to the Nelson Act of January 14, 1889, 25 Stat. 642, and the Act of February 20, 1904, 33 Stat. 46, the Band ceded to the United States “all our right, title, and interest in and to all” of the land here in question.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit  31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I,  Geoffrey  Eiten,  certify  that:

1.     I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form 10-QSB of Mason Hill
Holdings,  Inc.

2.     Based  on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial statements, and other financial
information  included  in  this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for  the  registrant  and  have:

A)     designed  such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is  made  known  to  us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period  in  which  this  quarterly  report  is  being  prepared;

B)     evaluated  the  effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  as  of  a  date  within  90  days  prior  to the filing date of this
quarterly  report  (the  "evaluation  date");  and

C)     presented  in  this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as  of  the  evaluation  date;

5.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the equivalent
functions):

A)     all  significant  deficiencies  in  the  design  or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have  identified for the
registrant's  auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and

B)     any  fraud,  whether  or  not material, that involves management or other
employees  who  have  a  significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6.     The  registrant's  other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether  or  not  there  were significant changes in internal
controls  or  in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent  to  the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions  with  regard  to  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses.


Date:     February  24,  2004
     /s/  Geoffrey  Eiten
     Geoffrey  Eiten
     President
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOTITLE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Enzo Biochem, Inc., and
Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |                                                                                                                                                           
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully
 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |                                                                                                                                                           
| | (2) The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |     |                                                              
|-------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: June 9,
 2010 | By: | /s/ Elazar
 Rabbani, Ph.D.                                   
|                     |     |                                                              
|                     |     | Elazar Rabbani,
 Ph.D.                                       
|                     |     | Chairman of the
 Board, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                  APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                                           174,433
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 174,433
<PP&E>                                                             7,806
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     1,561
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   184,136
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             17,424
<BONDS>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                           6,780
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                       (58,068)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     184,136
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       0
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 312,455
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 2,950
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (315,405)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (315,405)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      (315,405)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (.05)



</TABLE>