T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J AC KE L I N A NT ON I A G UE R R E R OH E RN A N D E Z ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 70463 A ge nc yN os . A 099- 675- 928

A 099- 675- 929 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r16, 2010 ** B efo re: T A S H IM A , B E R Z O N , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J a c k e l i n An t o n i aGu e rr e r o - He rn an d e z an dh e rs o n , n a t i v e s an dc i t i z e n s o f El S al vado r, pet i t i on for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order d is m is s in g th e irap p e a l f r o m th e im m ig r a tio nju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g th e ir appl i c a t i on f

ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , and pr ot e c t i on unde rthe 

# FI LED NO V 22 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 70463 2 Co n v e n t i o n A g a i n s tTo rtu r e ( “ CA T” ) . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r8 U . S. C. § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew de no vo the B IA ’ s l egalconcl usi on s and re vi ew for s ub st ant i al e v id e n c e f

a c tu a l f in d in g s . B arri os v. H

older , 5 8 1 F .3 d8 4 9 , 8 5 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. G uerr er o-H ernand ez do es no tchal l enge the B IA ’ s r ej ec t i on of her propo se d soci algrou p. S ub st ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the B IA ’ s det erm i nat i on that G ue rr e r o- H e rnande z f

a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h the e xt ort i on de m ands and thr e a t s f r om g an g m e m b e r s w e r e o n a c c o u n t o f ap r o te c te dg r o u n d . Se e i d. at85 6 (evi dence supp ort ed concl usi on thatgang vi ct i m i ze d the pet i t i on erfor e cono m i c and pers on al r e a s o n s r a th e rth an o n a c c o u n t o f ap r o te c te dg r o u n d ) ; se e al so P arussim ova v. Mukasey , 5 5 5 F .3 d7 3 4 , 7 4 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) ( “[ t]h e R E A L I D A c t r e qu ir e s th a t a p ro tected g ro u n dre p re se n t ‘ o n e c en tral re as o n ’ fo r a n as ylu m ap p li ca n t’ s p e r s e c u tio n ” ) . A c c o r d in g ly , b e c au s e G u e rr e r o - H e rn an d e z f a ile dto d e m o n s tr a te s he w a s pe r s e c ut e d orf

e ar s pe r s e c ut i on on a c c ountof apr ot e c t e d gr ound, w e de ny th e p e titio n a s to p e titio n e r s ’ a s y lu m an dw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l c la im s . See B arr i os , 5 8 1 F .3 da t 8 5 6 ; s e e O c h a v e v . I NS , 254 F . 3d 859, 865 ( 9th C i r . 2001) (“ A sy l um general l y i s notavai l abl e t o v i ct i m s of c i vi l stri fe , un l es s they are si ng l ed ou ton ac coun tof a prot ec t ed grou nd . ”) .09- 70463 3 S ub st an t i al ev i d en ce al so sup p o rt s th e ag en cy’ s d en i al o f C A T rel i ef b ecau se p e titio n e r s d idn o t e s tab lis h alik e lih o o do f b e in g to rtu r e din E l S a lv a d o r . See Sa ntos-L em us v. Mukasey , 54 2 F . 3d 73 8, 74 7-48 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.