alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Neurological Sciences Training Initial Review Group; NST-2 Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         March 9-10, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         The Fairmont Washington, DC, 2401 M Street NW., Washington, DC 20037.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Elizabeth A. Webber, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NINDS/NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-1917,                         *webbere@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 16, 2014.

Carolyn Baum,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-29844 Filed 12-19-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | By: /s/ Asi Shalgi——————————————Asi ShalgiChief Executive Officer and President |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | By: /s/ Shlomo Zakai——————————————Shlomo ZakaiTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----
<PAGE>
         EXHIBIT 99.2 - SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, SS.906 CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew A. Campbell, certify that:

     (1)  the Form 10-K of Pactiv Corporation for the year ended December 31,
          2002, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of ss.13(a)
          or ss.15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          Pactiv Corporation for the period then ended.


     /s/  ANDREW A. CAMPBELL
------------------------------------
Andrew A. Campbell
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

  March 25, 2003
------------------------------------
Date
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WARREN CLAYBAR, et al., )

 )

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION 14-0205-WS-C

 )

MICHAEL R. HUFFMAN, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

In accordance with the separate Order entered on this date, it is ordered, adjudged and 

decreed that DEFAULT JUDGMENT be, and the same hereby is, entered in favor of plaintiff 

Warren Claybar and against defendant Michael R. Huffman in the amount of $605,483.95. It is 

further ordered, adjudged and decreed that DEFAULT JUDGMENT be, and the same hereby 

is, entered in favor of plaintiff Rian Glasscock and against defendant Michael R. Huffman in the 

amount of $605,483.95. And it is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that DEFAULT 

JUDGMENT be, and the same hereby is, entered in favor of plaintiff Halley Moor and against 

defendant Michael R. Huffman in the amount of $605,483.95. 

DONE and ORDERED this 7th day of December, 2015.

s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00205-WS-C Document 67 Filed 12/08/15 Page 1 of 1
IN	THE	UNITED	STATES	DISTRICT	COURT	FOR	THE

SOUTHERN	DISTRICT	OF	ALABAMA

SOUTHERN	DIVISION

UNITED	STATES	OF	AMERICA )

v. ) CRIMINAL	NOS.	 11-00152-CB

					12-00101-CB

LUIS	DANIEL	COLON, )

Defendant. )

ORDER

This	matter	is	before	the	Court	on	defendant’s	motion	for	reduction	of	

sentence	pursuant	to	18	U.S.C.	§	3582(c)(2)	based	on	a	retroactive	amendment	to	

the	United	States	Sentencing	Guidelines.		In	2014,	the	United	States	Sentencing	

Commission	(“the	Commission”)	enacted	an	amendment	to	the	United	States	

Sentencing	Guidelines	that	further	reduced	the	sentencing	ranges	for	certain	

offenses.		See Amendment	782,	United	States	Sentencing	Guidelines.		The	

Commission	has	deemed	this	to	be	an	amendment	that	may	be	applied	retroactively.		

See U.S.S.G.	§	1B1.10.		After	review	of	the	motion	and	all	relevant	factors	prescribed	

by	§	1B1.10,	the	court	has	determined	that	a	reduction	of	sentence	based	on	the	

amended	guideline	range	may	be	appropriate	in	this	case.		

Defendant	pled	guilty	in	the	above-styled	cases	and	was	sentenced	to	

concurrent	sentence	of	188	months.		His	original	calculated	guidelines range	was

188 to	235	months.	According	to	the	revised	guidelines	calculation	prepared	by	the	

United	States	Probation	Office,	application	of	Amendment	782	would	result	in	a	

guideline	range	of	151 to	188 months. Unless	the	United	States	files	a	written	

Case 1:11-cr-00152-TFM-C Document 597 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

<pageID>
objection	on	or	before July	22,	2016,	the	Court	will	enter	an	order	reducing the	

defendant’s	sentence	to	151 months.

DONE this	the	22nd day	of	June,	2016

s/Charles	R.	Butler,	Jr.

Senior	United	States	District	Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00152-TFM-C Document 597 Filed 06/22/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

<pageID>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Lee Ann Colbert, * From the 39th District Court

of Haskell County,

Trial Court No. 12258.

Vs. No. 11-18-00063-CV * March 19, 2020

Brad Smith and Haley Smith and * Memorandum Opinion by Stretcher, J.

Rolling Plains Funeral Homes, Inc. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., 

d/b/a Smith Family Funeral Home, Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause is remanded for 

further proceedings. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed 

against Lee Ann Colbert.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 22, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00332

- CV

Lee B. WHEELER , Trustee of the L&P Children's Trust and Nancy Wheeler Plumlee

, Appellant s

v.

SAN MIGUEL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.

, Appellee

From the 36th Judicial District Court, McMullen County, Texas

Trial Court No. M

- 17

- 0027

- CV

- A Honorable Starr Boldrick Bauer, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

This appeal is set for oral argument submission on Tues day, May 19 , 2020, at 9 : 00 a.m. , before a panel consisting of Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, and

Justice Liza A. Rodriguez

. In accordance with the Texas Supreme Court’s emergency orders in response to the COVID

- 1 9 pandemic, the oral argument will be held through the Fourth Court of Appeals ’ Z oom license. To accommodate oral argument through the Z oom license, the scheduled time for this argument is changed to 10:30 a.m. Counsel are instructed not to appear

at the c ourt’s physical address

.

Counsel will receive a separate e

- mail that will contain a link f or the oral argument.

Co unsel are admonished as follows:

1

. T he link to Z oom is only for lead counsel of record and is not to be shared with any other person. Lead counsel will need a computer or other electronic device with a camera , a microphone

, and access to the Internet

. If lead counsel intends to present any exhibits during oral argument, any such exhibits must be electronically filed by noon on the day before

argument.

2. The argument will be l ive streamed to the Court’s YouTube channel for the benefit of

co

- counsel, clients, and the public

. The argument can be accessed using the following link :

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiaWJQ7eW5OQIALdyLN6s3A3 . Lead counsel are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the Z oom platform . The

clerk of the court will c ontact lead coun sel no later than the week before argument to verify connectivity and equipment.

4

. Lead counsel must wear court

- appropriate attire and choose an appropriate background

.

The time for oral argument will be limited to twenty minutes for appellant’s open ing argument, twenty minutes for appellee’s argument, and ten minutes for appellant’s rebuttal

argument

. If any participant’s link is disconnected during argument, timing of the argument will stop until the participant is able to reconnect.

If either party no longer wishes to present argument, the party must notify this court in writing within seven days of receiving this notice.

En tered on this 22 nd day of April , 2020.



### PER C URIAM

Attested to:

_____________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1
                                                            Exhibit 11.1


                    FIDUCIARY CAPITAL PENSION PARTNERS, L.P.


                         STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET
                          INVESTMENT INCOME PER LIMITED
                                PARTNERSHIP UNIT
               FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND 1997


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 1998           1997
                                                 ----           ----
<S>                                          <C>             <C>

Net Investment Income                        $   14,465      $  149,538

Percentage Allocable to Limited Partners             99%             99%
                                             ----------      ----------

Net Investment Income Allocable
   to Limited Partners                       $   14,320      $  148,043
                                             ==========      ==========

Weighted Average Number of Limited
   Partnership Units Outstanding              1,020,142       1,104,881
                                             ==========      ==========

Net Investment Income Per Limited
   Partnership Unit                          $      .01      $      .13
                                             ==========      ==========
</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
No. 1 6 4 A 1 8
Filed 10 May 2019
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v. DAVID WOODARD DANIEL

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 814 S.E.2d 6 18 (201 8 ), reversing a n order granting defendant’s motion to suppress e ntered on 8 Ju ne 201 7 by Judge P a trice A.

Hinnant in Superior Court, Wilkes County and remanding for further proceedings

. Hear d in the Supreme Court on 8 April 2019

.

Joshua H. Stein , Attorney General, by Christopher W. Brooks, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State

. Vannoy, Colvard, Triplett & Vannoy, PLLC, by Jay Vannoy, for d efendant

appellant

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
March 18, 1988

No. 87-1079.

#### Palumbo et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari dismissed as to petitioner Robert T. Porter under this Court’s Rule 53.
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201700007

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

DAISJURR A. SOSVILLE

Aviation Machinist’s Mate Airman (E-3), U.S. Navy

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Captain Bethany L. Payton-O’Brien, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Strike Fighter Squadron 

ONE FIVE FOUR, Lemoore, CA.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Commander 

M.S. Bailey, JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Captain Armando A. Rodriquez-Feo, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 17 March 2017

_________________________

Before CAMPBELL, HUTCHISON, and ELLINGTON, Appellate Military 

Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Miriam D. Doane, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

February 12, 1925.

Wills — construction — legacy to hospital — prior to death of testatrix legatee was duly consolidated with another hospital — new corporation continued policy of legatee — legacy payable to consolidated corporation.

Where a testatrix gave a legacy to a hospital and prior to her death the hospital merged with another hospital and said corporations were duly consolidated, the new corporation, which has continued the general policy and methods of the legatee, is entitled to take the legacy.

Proceeding for an accounting involving the construction of will.

*Sullivan & Cromwell,*for the executor.

*Wing & Russell [Burt D. Wheldon*of counsel], for Fifth Avenue Hospital of New York City.

*Gilbert E. Roe,*for the residuary legatee.

Foley, S.:

In this accounting proceeding a question has arisen as to whether a legacy of $5,000 to the Hahnemann Hospital of the city of New York, under paragraph 2 of the will, lapsed. Prior to the death of the. testatrix the hospital merged with the Laura Franklin Free Hospital, and these corporations were consolidated into a single corporation known as the Fifth Avenue Hospital of the city of New York. Prior to the death of the testatrix the consolidation became complete, and was ratified by an order of the Supreme Court, New York county. The new corporation has continued the general policy and methods of treatment of patients of the Hahnemann Hospital.

*664I hold that the legacy is payable to the consolidated corporation, the Fifth Avenue Hospital of the city of New York. Thereby the intent of the testatrix will be effectuated and the oft-repeated policy of the courts to encourage charitable gifts will be followed. Moreover, ample authority in law exists for such determination. (Membership Corp. Law, § 7, as it existed prior to the amendment made by Laws of 1924, chap. 327; *Matter of Bergdorf,*206 N. Y. 309.) The case of *Wright*v. *Wright*(225 N. Y. 329) has no application to the facts and circumstances in this estate. There a legatee, before the testator died, transferred its property to a separate corporation, surrendered its charter, and ceased to exist. In that case there was no merger, consolidation, succession or devolution.

Submit decree accordingly.
[ALLTEL Corporation Letterhead]

 

 

**Exhibit 99(b)**
April 25, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission450 Fifth Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: Arthur Andersen LLP

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") has represented to ALLTELCorporation that its audit of the financial statements of the ALLTEL Corporation401(k) Plan as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statement ofchanges in net assets available for benefits for the year ended December 31,2001 was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accountingand auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement wasconducted in compliance with professional standards and that there wasappropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit andavailability of national office consultation. Availability of personnel atforeign affiliates of Andersen is not relevant to this audit.

Sincerely,  
      /s/ Jeffery R. Gardner

Jeffery R. Gardner      Senior Vice President-Chief Financial Officer       ALLTEL Corporation
#### W. L. English’s G’d’n *v.*James B. English.

Homestead — Right of Non-Resident to Claim Homestead as Exempt.

The right of a judgment debtor to a homestead only continues so long as he occupies or resides on the premises. When he has moved from the premises and to another state he cannot claim such exemption.

APPEAL PROM BULLITT CIRCUIT COURT.

December 14, 1876.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Bullitt circuit court sustaining appellee’s motion to. quash the levy of appellant’s execution on about forty-five acres of land in Bullitt county which appellee claims is exempt from levy and sale, because the same was set apart to him as his homestead in a suit brought by his creditors against his trustee to whom he had conveyed his estate for the benefit of his creditors, to which suit appellant was a party.

In his deed to the trustee for the benefit of his creditors the appellee reserved the homestead in the land levied on by appellant’s execution, which levy has been quashed and held for naught by the court below in this case.

*821
      *R. J. Meyler, for appellant. R. H. Field, for appellee.*

In 1873, according to the evidence, appellee left this state and emigrated with his family to Missouri, and has since on his visits to Kentucky avowed his intentions never to return and become a resident of Kentucky. His agent has rented this land out for him since 1873, and under these circumstances the only question is whether appellee can still hold the abandoned premises as a homestead and exempt from levy and sale by his execution creditors.

In *Gaines, et al., v. Casey, et al.,*10 Bush 92, this court held that “this right to the exemption must terminate whenever the debtor ceases to be a housekeeper or removes from the premisesand the same doctrine has since been held in *Phipps, Addington, et al., v. Acton, et al.,*Mss. Opionion.

There can be no doubt that the right of a judgment debtor to a homestead only continues so long as he occupies or resides on the premises, but when he ceases to occupy the premises and leaves the state and remains away over two years, and resides in another state, when a fi. fa. is levied upon his land he cannot insist on his right to a homestead as against his execution creditors.

Wherefore the judgment is *reversed*and cause remanded with directions to overrule appellee’s motion.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of BF Acquisition Group
III,  Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending
September  30,  2004  as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"),  I,  Justin  P.
DiNorscia,  President  of the Company, certify,  pursuant  to  18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934; and
    (2)  The  information contained in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 14, 2005

                          /s/ Justin P. DiNorscia
                          ---------------------------------------
                          Justin P. DiNorscia, President
                          BF Acquisition Group III, Inc.


<PAGE>
December 31, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

D. PATRICK SMITHERMA N , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00148

- CV V.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A

. , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard the parties ’ joint motion to reverse the judgment signed by the court below on November 19, 2014. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the judgment REVERSED AND REM AND the cause to the trial court for proceedings in accordance with th e parties’ agreement

. We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal. We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of BF Acquisition Group V, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William R. Colucci, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: July 29, 2008



| |                              
| | -----------------------------
| | /s/ William R. Colucci       
| | William R. Colucci, Treasurer
| | BF Acquisition Group V, Inc.