alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUBROUTINE WEICDF(X,GAMMA,CDF)
C
C     PURPOSE--THIS SUBROUTINE COMPUTES THE CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
C              FUNCTION VALUE FOR THE WEIBULL
C              DISTRIBUTION WITH SINGLE PRECISION 
C              TAIL LENGTH PARAMETER = GAMMA.
C              THE WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION USED
C              HEREIN IS DEFINED FOR ALL POSITIVE X,
C              AND HAS THE PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION
C              F(X) = GAMMA * (X**(GAMMA-1)) * EXP(-(X**GAMMA)).
C     INPUT  ARGUMENTS--X      = THE SINGLE PRECISION VALUE 
C                                AT WHICH THE CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION 
C                                FUNCTION IS TO BE EVALUATED.
C                                X SHOULD BE POSITIVE.
C                     --GAMMA  = THE SINGLE PRECISION VALUE 
C                                OF THE TAIL LENGTH PARAMETER.
C                                GAMMA SHOULD BE POSITIVE.
C     OUTPUT ARGUMENTS--CDF    = THE SINGLE PRECISION CUMULATIVE
C                                DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION VALUE.
C     OUTPUT--THE SINGLE PRECISION CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
C             FUNCTION VALUE CDF FOR THE WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION
C             WITH TAIL LENGTH PARAMETER VALUE = GAMMA.
C     PRINTING--NONE UNLESS AN INPUT ARGUMENT ERROR CONDITION EXISTS. 
C     RESTRICTIONS--GAMMA SHOULD BE POSITIVE.
C                 --X SHOULD BE POSITIVE.
C     OTHER DATAPAC   SUBROUTINES NEEDED--NONE.
C     FORTRAN LIBRARY SUBROUTINES NEEDED--EXP.
C     MODE OF INTERNAL OPERATIONS--SINGLE PRECISION.
C     LANGUAGE--ANSI FORTRAN. 
C     REFERENCES--JOHNSON AND KOTZ, CONTINUOUS UNIVARIATE
C                 DISTRIBUTIONS--1, 1970, PAGES 250-271.
C               --HASTINGS AND PEACOCK, STATISTICAL
C                 DISTRIBUTIONS--A HANDBOOK FOR
C                 STUDENTS AND PRACTITIONERS, 1975,
C                 PAGE 124.
C     WRITTEN BY--JAMES J. FILLIBEN
C                 STATISTICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY (205.03)
C                 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
C                 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20234
C                 PHONE:  301-921-2315
C     ORIGINAL VERSION--NOVEMBER  1975. 
C
C---------------------------------------------------------------------
C
      IPR=6
C
C     CHECK THE INPUT ARGUMENTS FOR ERRORS
C
      IF(X.LE.0.0)GOTO50
      IF(GAMMA.LE.0.0)GOTO55
      GOTO90
   50 WRITE(IPR,4)
      WRITE(IPR,46)X
      CDF=0.0
      RETURN
   55 WRITE(IPR,15) 
      WRITE(IPR,46)GAMMA
      CDF=0.0
      RETURN
   90 CONTINUE
    4 FORMAT(1H ,100H***** NON-FATAL DIAGNOSTIC--THE FIRST  INPUT ARGUME
     1NT TO THE WEICDF SUBROUTINE IS NON-POSITIVE *****)
   15 FORMAT(1H , 91H***** FATAL ERROR--THE SECOND INPUT ARGUMENT TO THE
     1 WEICDF SUBROUTINE IS NON-POSITIVE *****)
   46 FORMAT(1H , 35H***** THE VALUE OF THE ARGUMENT IS ,E15.8,6H *****)
C
C-----START POINT-----------------------------------------------------
C
      CDF=1.0-(EXP(-(X**GAMMA)))
C
      RETURN
      END
#### Jordan Thomas *v.*S. S. Rowlett, et al.

Married Women — Separate Estate in Lands.

A conveyance to a married woman, her heirs and assigns forever, free from the use and control of her said husband, where the warranty is in the same words, is sufficient to create a separate estate.

Estoppel.

The statute does not permit a married woman to sell or incumber her separate estate, nor can she estop herself of the right to claim it, by such representations as would estop other persons free from statutory disability.

APPEAL PROM OWEN CIRCUIT COURT.

January 13, 1876.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

The conveyance from Jones is to America Rowlett, her heirs and assigns forever, free from the use and control of her said husband, and the warranty is in the same words. The .language is such as to create a separate estate. The mortgage to the appellant does not, therefore, bind Mrs. Rowlett.

*579
      *J. D.*Lillard, *for appellant. E. E.*Settle, *for appellees.*

The first amended petition offered, at most only sets out a state of facts, which tended to estop Mrs. Rowlett to claim the land as separate estate. But as a feme covert, under the provisions of the Revised Statutes, could not sell or .encumber her separate estate, neither could she divest herself of the right to claim it by such acts or representations as would, in cases of persons free from the statutory disability, create an estoppel in pais. The court, therefore, did not err in refusing to allow this amended answer to be filed. The second amended answer was not offered until the cause was ready for hearing, and no explanation was offered for the delay. We cannot say that the court abused a sound discretion in refusing at the time to allow it to be filed.

As Mrs. Rowlett and her husband and Bourne are the only parties made appellees, we need not inquire as to the propriety of the action of the court, as to co-sureties of appellant.

No attack was made upon the conveyance to Bourne.

The judgment must be *affirmed.*
Exhibit 31.1

                CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                              PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William Bosso, certify that:

       1.	I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nortia
Capital Partners, Inc.;

       2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

       3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

       4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and have:

       	a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

       	b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and

       	c)	disclosed in this report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

       5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of our internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or other persons
performing the equivalent functions):

       	a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

<PAGE>

        b)      any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	November 18, 2005


/S/ WILLIAM BOSSO
--------------------------------------
William Bosso, Chief Executive Officer
## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION II No. CR

- 13

- 482

ALFRED JAMES WALKER
APPELLANT
V.
STATE OF ARKANSAS
APPELLEE Opinion Delivered December 11, 2013
APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT , FOURTH DIVISION [NO. CR

- 12

- 2081 ]
HONORABLE HERBERT WRIGHT , JUDGE
AFFIRMED

RHONDA K. WOOD , Judge Appellant Alfred James Walker was convicted of theft of property greater than $1,000 but less than $5,000, a Class D felony. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction. His argument is not preserved for appeal, and we
affirm. Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 33.1 requires a defendant to renew a motion for directed verdict or dismissal at the “close of the case” in order to preserve for review any question pertaining to the sufficiency of the evidence. To preserve for appeal the issue of the sufficiency of the evidence in a criminal case, the appellant must move for a
directed verdict at the close of all the evidence

. Sellers v. State , 2013 Ark. App. 210. Here, Walker moved to dismiss the charges against him at the close of the State’s evidence. However, at the close of all evidence, he failed to renew his motion. Following the strict2

standard set out in Rule 33.1(c), Walker failed to preserve for appellate review the issue of sufficiency of the evidence.
Affirmed.
W YNNE and H IXSON , JJ., agree. William R. Simpson, Jr. , Public Defender, Brandy Turner , Deputy Public Defender, by: Margaret Egan , Deputy Public Defender, for appellant.
Dustin McDaniel , Att ’ y Gen., by: Kathryn Henry , Ass ’ t Att ’ y Gen., and Nathan Aylesworth , Law Student Admitted to Practice Pursuant to Rule XV of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar of the Supreme Court under the supervision of Darnisa Evans Johnson , Deputy Att ’ y Gen., for appellee.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

| | William C. Owens as Chief Executive Officer and President of Owens Financial Group, Inc., the General Partner of Owens Mortgage Investment Fund, a California Limited Partnership (the Registrant), and Bryan H. Draper, as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Owens Financial Group, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (1) the Registrants Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the applicable requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ William C. OwensWilliam C. Owens Chief Executive Officer and President of Owens Financial Group, Inc., General PartnerOctober 17, 2005
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Bryan H. DraperBryan H. Draper Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Owens Financial Group, Inc., General PartnerOctober 17, 2005
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<page>	EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund II L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey
A. Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		August 15, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1568 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1568

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2024

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to protect personally identifiable 
                  information, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Moving Americans Privacy Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 431(c) of the Tariff Act 
of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1431(c)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(2)(A) The information listed in paragraph (1) shall not be 
available for public disclosure if--
            ``(i) the Secretary of the Treasury makes an affirmative 
        finding on a shipment-by-shipment basis that disclosure is 
        likely to pose a threat of personal injury or property damage; 
        or
            ``(ii) the information is exempt under the provisions of 
        section 552(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code.
    ``(B) The Secretary shall ensure that any personally identifiable 
information, including Social Security numbers and passport numbers, is 
removed from any manifest signed, produced, delivered, or 
electronically transmitted under this section before access to the 
manifest is provided to the public.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 30 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 18, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
ALANP. BROOKS, President
                           CONE, ROSE, THATCHER, LTD.
                       2700 N. Military Trail, Suite 220
                           Boca Raton, Florida 33431,
                                 (561) 994-0800

                                August 15, 2000

                        VIA TELEFAX AND US REGULAR MAIL
                        -------------------------------

JAMES B. LONG, President and CEO
IAN PALLET, Executive Vice President
SAFE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, INC.
409 GRANVILLE STREET, SUITE 400
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA VGC IT2

Re:      Amendment to Cone, Rose, Thatcher, Ltd.
         Financial and Advisory Services Agreement
         of August 12, 2000

Dear Messrs. Long and Pallet:

The "Agreement" executed on August 12, 2000 by and between Cone, Rose, Thatcher,
Ltd.,  a Delaware  Corporation  and/or it assigns  (hereinafter  referred  to as
"CRT")  and  Safe   Transportation   Systems,   Inc.,  a  Canadian   Corporation
(hereinafter referred to as "STS') is amended as follows:

         1. CRT shall  facilitate  the funding of STS as referenced in paragraph
            1(D) of the Agreement  after STS has become a  domesticated  Florida
            Corporation.

         2. CRT's  remuneration as referenced in Paragraph  3(A)(B)(C)(D)(E)  of
            the   Agreement   shall   be   undertaken   simultaneously   to  the
            domestication  of STS and issued to CRT upon/from the reverse merger
            with the publicly traded company.

In all other respects, except as modified hereinabove,  the terms and conditions
of the said Agreement are hereby ratified,  affirmed,  approved and incorporated
herein by reference and made part hereof.


<PAGE>


If you should have any questions or comments  concerning  the  foregoing  please
feel free to contact me so that we may discuss same.


Very truly yours,

By: /s/ Allen P. Brooks
-----------------------
        Alan P. Brooks, President

APB:MBG:agw

ACKNOWLEDGED, UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED

By: /s/ James B. Long
---------------------
        James B. Long, President and CEO
        Safe Transportation Systems, Inc.

By: /s/ Ian Pallett
-------------------
        Ian Pallett
        Executive Vice President
        Safe Transportation Systems, Inc.

<PAGE>
1 4/7/2006

Video and Im

Face Recognition U

PDE-Textons

Umasankar K

Donald A

Natalia 

Nathan 

Lane Dep

West Virgini

Morgantown
2 4/7/2006

Preamble

3⁄4 Steps followed in FRGC v.13⁄4 Results of Preprocessing 3⁄4 Results of PDE-Textons on AR datase

3⁄4 Comparison results between LBP, Texton

3⁄4 Results on FRGC v.1 dataset – with p
3 4/7/2006

Steps Followed for FRGC 
4 4/7/2006

Illumination Compensa

3⁄4 Minvariance-Lighting - Novel Techniqu

3⁄4Handle diffuse and specular reflecta3⁄4Inspired from the dichromatic color 

3⁄4 Advantages

3⁄4Low computational cost3⁄4Improved Performance 
5 4/7/2006

Results of Minvariance-Li

Note: This Multiscale retinex is based on Land an
6 4/7/2006

Results of Minvariance-Li
7 4/7/2006

Results of Minvariance-Li
8 4/7/2006

Comparison with LBP and 

3⁄4 Popular texture analysis schemes, nam

Binary Patterns (LBP) and 3D Textons under varying illumination and viewing 

3⁄4 LBP 

3⁄4 Works well for micro texture.3⁄4 Very efficient

3⁄4 3D Textons 

3⁄4 Works well under Varying lighting direction 

condition

3⁄4 Computationally expensive
9 4/7/2006

PDE-Textons

3⁄4 Computationally cheap3⁄4 Better performance than both LBP and 3⁄4 Requires relatively less learning and le

set.

3⁄4 Better representation of Facial Feature
10 4/7/2006

PDE-Textons - Analysis 

3⁄4 Test performed in AR database [1].3⁄4 No of classes: 1203⁄4 1 image/class for Training3⁄4 12 novel images/class for Testing 

(with expression, illumination variation and occlusion)

3⁄4 200 Textons were used to 

represent the face images.

3⁄4 k-NN Classifier

Sam

[1] A.M. Martinez and R. Benavente,``The AR face database," CVC 
11 4/7/2006

PDE-Textons Results

Note: The results are obtained without any pre
12 4/7/2006

FRGC v.1 – Experiment 1
13 4/7/2006

FRGC v.1 – Experiment 1
14 4/7/2006

FRGC v.1 – Experiment 1
15 4/7/2006

Currently Studying

3⁄4 Portability of Textons from set of images t3⁄4 Possible extensions to Motons (to handle 3⁄4 Face retrieval – (efficient automated retrie3⁄4 Modeling variations in feature with respec3⁄4 Applications to Multimodal Biometrics
16 4/7/2006

Thanks and Question

Contact:Umasankar Kandaswamy : umasank@cseDonald Adjeroh: don@csee.wvu.eduNatalia Schmid: Natalia.Schmid@mail.wvuNathan Kalka: Nathan.Kalka@mail.wvu.ed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               6
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         139
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       175
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (1)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (1)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       1
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>