alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Martin & Ball *v.*Shelby & Dalton.

Practice — Instructions Now Made a Part of the Record.

Instructions offered but refused to be given by the court do not become a part of the record by a mere recital in an order of the court that they were asked and refused- They must be made a part of the record either by the court’s order or by bill of exceptions.

APPEAL FROM BALLARD CIRCUIT COURT.

February 2, 1876.

*Reeves & Brown, Thomas, for appellants.*

*W. G. Bullitt, Bugg & Bishop, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Coker :

Instructions Nos. i, 2, 3, 4 and 11 asked by the appellants and refused by the court are not made a part of the record, although the order of court recites that they were asked and refused, and that the appellants then excepted to the refusal. The rule is that instructions refused do not become a part of the record by a mere recital in an order of the court that they were asked and refused.

Being refused, they are the private papers of the party offering them, and never came to the custody of the clerk as a part of the record unless expressly made part of it by the order or by bill of exceptions; but instructions recited on the record as given thereby became a part of the record, and when identified by the certificate of the clerk may be considered by this court.

To instructions numbered 6 and 7 given by the court, the appellants excepted, and these we may consider as a part of the record, but they seem to us to have been correct. Instructions 8, 9 and 10 were given on motion of appellants.

The verdict does not seem to us to be so palpably against the evidence as to warrant a reversal on that ground. Two juries have-found against the appellants on the evidence, and if the propriety of their finding was even more doubtful than we think it is, we should not feel authorized to interfere.

Judgment *affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 32(a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Enzo Biochem,  Inc., and Subsidiaries
("the Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


                  (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,
in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
the Company.





Dated: March 12, 2007                            By: /s/ Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.
                                                     -------------------------
                                                         Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.
                                                         Chief Executive Officer




         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Act
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 Netegrity, Inc.

                            Certification Pursuant To
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Netegrity, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Barry N. Bycoff, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 3, 2004                       /s/ Barry N. Bycoff
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Barry N. Bycoff
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1876 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of 

Representatives, Member’s Representational Allowance for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House 

of Representatives, Member’s Representational Allowance 

for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, MEMBER’S 

5 REPRESENTATIONAL ALLOWANCE FOR FIS6 CAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for House of Representatives, Member’s RepresentaVerDate Sep 11 2014 07:01 Apr 13, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1876.IH H1876

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1876 IH

1 tional Allowance for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $573,630,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
 This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          JAN-08-2000
<CASH>                                     21,666
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                              61,369
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                               155,150
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          244,802
<PP&E>                                    929,351
<DEPRECIATION>                            545,933
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            974,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     162,297
<BONDS>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                207,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              974,199
<SALES>                                 1,719,920
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1,719,920
<CGS>                                   1,207,378
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           1,207,378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          578,120
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         33,148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (98,726)
<INCOME-TAX>                                1,258
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (99,984)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                             (99,984)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (3.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (3.33)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.2

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

20% CONVERTIBLE SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

 

This First Amendment to 20% Convertible Secured Promissory Note (this “Amendment”) is entered into on May 5, 2015, and effective April 28, 2015 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Wisdom Homes of America, Inc. (f/k/a SearchCore, Inc.), a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and Equity Trust Co. Custodian f/b/o David E. Backman IRA #T050826 (the “Holder”).

 

RECITALS

 

WHEREAS, the Company and Holder are parties to that certain 20% Convertible Secured Promissory Note dated April 28, 2014, in the original principal amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) (the “Original Note”); and

 

WHEREAS, the Company and Holder desire to amend certain provisions of the Original Note, effective as of April 28, 2015, as set forth herein.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and adequate consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Holder agree as follows:

 

AGREEMENT

 

1. The first paragraph of the Original Note is restated in its entirety as follows:

 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, SearchCore, Inc., a Nevada corporation, its assigns and successors (the “Company”), hereby promises to pay to the order of Equity Trust Co. Custodian f/b/o David E. Backman IRA #T050826 (the “Holder”), in immediately available funds, the total principal sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00). The principal hereof and any unpaid accrued interest thereon shall be due and payable on or before 5:00 p.m., Pacific Time, on April 30, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”) (unless such payment date is accelerated as provided in Section 5 hereof). Payment of all amounts due hereunder shall be made at the address of the Holder provided for in Section 6 hereof. Interest shall accrue at the rate of twenty percent (20%) per annum on this Note from the date hereof. Any accrued interest shall be paid in full on the first day of each month beginning on June 1, 2014.

 

2.  Other than as set forth herein, the terms and conditions of the Original Note shall remain in full force and effect.

 

[remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page to follow]

 

	 
	
1








	





  

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Holder have executed this Agreement on the date first written above.

 

	 	
“Company”

	 	 	
“Holder”

	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	
Wisdom Homes of Nevada, Inc.,

	 	 	
Equity Trust Co. Custodian f/b/o

	 
	 	
a Nevada corporation

	 	 	
David E. Backman IRA #T050826

	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	
/s/ James Pakulis

	 	 	
/s/ David E. Backman

	 
	
By:

	
James Pakulis

	 	
By:

	
David E. Backman

	 
	
Its:

	
President

	 	
Its:

	
Lender/Owner of IRA Account

	 


 

 

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Radio Unica Communications Corp. for year ended December
31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      76,806,025
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,304,088
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            84,761,279
<PP&E>                                      17,434,918
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             201,086,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,206,138
<BONDS>                                    117,732,564
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       209,428
<OTHER-SE>                                  76,742,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               201,086,566
<SALES>                                     16,217,180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,217,180
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               57,623,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        (14,053,053)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (53,783,428)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (311,989)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (54,095,417)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (54,095,417)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.37)


</TABLE>
#### Charles E. HINTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jim PENDERGRAPH, Sheriff; Michael F. Easley, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 00-7755.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 31, 2001.

Decided June 6, 2001.

Charles E. Hinton, pro se.

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Charles E. Hinton seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his § 2254 motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Hinton’s notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, *see*Fed. R.App .P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App.P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on September 6, 2000. Hinton’s notice of appeal was filed on October 24, 2000. Because Hinton failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 14, 2015

No. 04-14-00844-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.R.V., A.M.A.F. AND I.I.F., Children,

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Real County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-3094-DC

The Honorable Cathy O. Morris, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extend Time to file Appellant’s Brief is GRANTED. The 

appellant’s brief is due on February 1, 2015.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:





(1)
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-162419) of American Oriental Bioengineering, Inc.; and





(2)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-141882) pertaining to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan of American Oriental Bioengineering, Inc.





of our reports dated March 15, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of American Oriental Bioengineering, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of American Oriental Bioengineering, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for year ended December 31, 2010.











/s/ Ernst & Young Hua Ming


Shanghai, People’s Republic of China


March 15, 2011
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. on
Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
expressed in the Report.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ K. M. McMullenKevin M. McMullenChairman, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President/s/ M. E. HicksMichael E. HicksSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer; Treasurer




Date:
January 30, 2006



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SALVADOR NAVA, AIS 260069, :

Petitioner, :

vs. : CA 10-0165-WS-C

JOHN CUMMINS, et al., :

Respondents.

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED,

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action is due to be, and hereby is, DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE in accordance with Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure for failure to prosecute and fully abide by this Court’s order dated April 22, 2010.

DONE this 29th day of June, 2010.

 s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00165-WS-C Document 10 Filed 06/29/10 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of the Petition of Annie C. Hamlin to Prove the Last Will and Testament of Denslo D. Hamlin, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,

March 19, 1925.

Wills — probate — material alterations — no satisfactory evidence as to when alterations were made — probate denied.

A will will be denied probate on the ground of material alterations where there is no satisfactory evidence as to whether the alterations were made before or after the execution of the will.

Proceeding for probate of will.

*Harry A. Back,*for the petitioner.

*Daniel J. McParland,*special guardian.

Wingate, S.:

The two subscribing witnesses testify to the due execution of the will and the testamentary capacity of the testator. They testify that they never saw any part of the will, except the last quarter fold of the page bearing the signatures, and they have no recollection as to whether or not the cancellation marks now on that portion of the paper were there when they signed.

The words “ also House 624 Beverly Rd,” upon the 13th and 14th lines of the 1st page, the words “ also House 629 Beverly Rd,” on the 5th line of the 2d page, and the words *“*also House 18 East 7 St,” on the 9th line of the 2d page of the will, are in a different colored ink from the body of the will, and the proof is that the premises designated by those street numbers were not acquired by the testator until after the date of the execution of the will. *848It is apparent that these words quoted were inserted after the will was executed.

The interlineations on the 18th line are immaterial and in no way affect the result. They are merely descriptive and being fair upon the face of the instrument and unexplained by any evidence to the contrary must be presumed to have been made before the execution of the will.

There is no evidence whatever as to when the words *“*the use of while he lives then to his children,” on the 23d line of the 1st page of the will were written on the face of the will, or when they were stricken out. These words are in testator’s handwriting and appear to be written in different ink from the body of the will. His initials appear in the margin adjoining. It is clear that he made certain alterations in the will after it was executed, but there is nothing to aid in reaching a conclusion as to this change.

Such also is the case in regard to lining out the words “ my two Sons Leslie E. Hamlin and Frankie D. Hamlin,” on the 11th, 12th and 13th lines on the 2d page, and the words lined out in the last paragraph. To attempt to find whether the changes were made before or after execution would be sheer speculation. The changes are material in their effect. When material provisions of a will have been erased or altered and the court cannot determine from the proof whether the alterations were made before or after execution, probate must be refused and the whole instrument rejected. *(Matter of Barber,*92 Hun, 489.)

The propounded paper is denied probate.

Settle decision and decree accordingly.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Dr. Christopher McCormack, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global  Environmental
Energy Corp.

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  Quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly
report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this Quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly report.

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
exchange act rules 13a-14 and 15d- 14) for the registrant and have:

     A) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this Quarterly report is being prepared;
     B) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
Quarterly report (the "evaluation date"); and
     C)  presented  in  this  Quarterly   report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the evaluation date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     A) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     B) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.


Date:  April 25, 2005

By:/s/ Dr Christopher McCormack
-----------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)