alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21.1**

 
| **Gaiam Subsidiaries**              | ** ** | **State or Country of  Incorporation or Registration** |
|-------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Gaiam Americas, Inc.           |       |                                                   | State  of Colorado |
| Gaiam.com, Inc.                |       |                                                   | State  of Colorado |
| Gaiam Direct, Inc.             |       |                                                   | State  of Colorado |
| Gaiam Energy  Tech, Inc.       |       |                                                   | State  of Colorado |
| Gaiam International, Inc.      |       |                                                   | State  of Colorado |
| Gaiam International  II, Inc.  |       |                                                   | State  of Colorado |
| Gaiam International  III, Inc. |       |                                                   | State  of Colorado |
| Gaiam Media, Inc.              |       |                                                   | State  of Colorado |
| Gaiam Shared  Services, Inc.   |       |                                                   | State  of Colorado |
| Gaiam Travel, Inc.             |       |                                                   | State  of Colorado |
| GT Media, Inc.                 |       |                                                   | State  of Colorado |
| GT Direct, Inc.                |       |                                                   | State  of Colorado |
| Gaiam West, Inc.               |       |                                                   | State  of California |
| Real Goods Trading  Corporation     |       |                                                   | State  of California |
| Gaiam International C.V.            |       |                                                   | The  Netherlands |
| Gaiam International B.V.            |       |                                                   | The  Netherlands |
| Gaiam Limited                       |       |                                                   | United  Kingdom |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

SELECTICA, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Selectica, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jim Thanos, Co-Chair of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: July 8, 2009



|                 
|-----------------
|/s/    JIM
THANOS
|Jim Thanos       
|Co-Chair
exhibit_4-1.htm










Exhibit 4.1


 



	
	
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL RADA ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIES LIMITED THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE IN NEW YORK, NEW YORK, U.S.A. OR ISRAEL THIS CERTIFIES that is the Registered Holder of FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE ORDINARY SHARES OF NIS 0.015 EACH of RADA ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIES LIMITED transferable on the books of the Company by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate and the shares represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions of the Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association and amendments thereto of the Company, to all of which the holder by the acceptance hereof assents. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate to be issued under the facsimile seal of the Company. Dated: CUSIP M81863 11 6 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS President and Chairman of the Board of Directors Secretary


AT THE REQUEST OF AND UPON PRESENTATION BY THE HOLDER, THIS CERTIFICATE WILL BE EXCHANGED FOR A HEBREW LANGUAGE SHARE CERTIFICATE Countersigned and Registered: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY (New York, N.Y.)  Transfer Agent and Registrar By  Authorized Signature AMERICAN BANK NOTE COMPANY







 




  





  











  







 



	
	
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM TEN ENT JT TEN – as tenants in common – as tenants by the entireties  – as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. UNIF GIFT MIN ACT – Custodian (Cust) (Minor) Act (State) under Uniform Gifts to Minors For value received,.............hereby sell, assign and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE Please print or typewrite name and address including postal zip code of assignee Shares represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said shares on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated, Notice: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the Certificate, in every particular, without alteration or enlargement, or any change whatever.
Exhibit 10.18

 

NGL Performance Unit Program

 

NGL has created a Performance Unit Program to reward senior management for total unit return, over a rolling three (3) year average, and further align us with our unit holders.

 

Each year we will evaluate NGL’s unit performance for the current and two (2) prior years.  The performance will be total return to our unit holders - change in unit price plus distributions.  We will then rank NGL against the other companies in the Alerian Index on the same basis.  The ranking period will be for three (3) years beginning on July 1 and ending on June 30 three years later.  This period aligns us with the reporting of our fiscal year end numbers, which are released June 1 (60 days after the close of our fiscal year).  The vesting requirements of this plan follow those of the Company’s LTIP plan.  Accordingly, you must be employed on July 1 to receive the performance plan units.

 

The units you will receive under this plan are based on a multiple of that year’s Restricted (time-based) LTIP units you have.  Based on NGL’s rank against the other companies in the Alerian Index, for the three year period, the multiplier will be calculated as follows:

 

	
·
    	
If   NGL ranks less than the 50th percentile, the multiplier is   0
    
	
·
    	
Between   the 50th and 75th percentile the multiplier ranges from 50% to   100%
    
	
·
    	
Between   the 75th and 90th percentile the multiplier ranges from 100%   to 200%
    
	
·
    	
Above   the 90th percentile – 200%
    


 

The look back period for calculating NGL’s ranking in the Alerian will be:

 

	
·
    	
2015   – 3 years
    	
July   1, 2012 to June 30, 2015
    	
 
    
	
·
    	
2016   – 3 years
    	
July   1, 2013 to June 30, 2016
    	
 
    
	
·
    	
2017   – 3 years
    	
July   1, 2014 to June 30, 2017
    	
 
    
	
·
    	
2018   and beyond
    	
Rolling   3 years
    	
 
    


 

For example:

 

If you have 5,000 Restricted (time-based) units that vest on July 1, then if on June 30 of that same year we are at the 92nd percentile of the Alerian companies, for the three (3) year period, you would receive an additional 10,000 units  (5,000 X 200% = 10,000).  These are in addition to the 5,000 Restricted (time-based) units.  For that year, you would receive a total of 15,000 units.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
October 1, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the
periods covered by the Report.
 /s/ Thomas P. Kealy

Thomas P. KealyVice President, Corporate Controllerand Chief Accounting Officer (principalfinancial and accounting officer)
EXHIBIT 23.2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Forms S-8 No. 333-41542 and No. 333-72036) pertaining to the 1999Equity Participation Plan of Golden Telecom, Inc. and in the Post EffectiveAmendment No. 1 (Form S-3 No. 333-39260) to Registration Statement on Form S-1of Golden Telecom, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated March6, 2003, with respect to the financial statements of EDN Sovintel LLC, includedin this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Golden Telecom, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2004.
/s/ Ernst & Young (CIS) Limited
Moscow, Russia
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of FieldPoint Petroleum Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ray Reaves, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/Ray Reaves_________ Ray Reaves Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer May 13, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CRIMINAL NO. 12-00130-CG

)

DAVID R. BRADLEY, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER AMENDING JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE 

This matter comes before this Court on the United States’ Motion to Amend 

Judgment to Correct Clerical Error in a Criminal Case (Doc. 47). The Court, having 

considered the motion, finds that it is due to be GRANTED. It is ORDERED that 

the Judgment in this case is amended as follows:

1. The Heirs of Gloria Johnson shall be replaced by:

a. Lakailyn Johnson, Heir of Gloria Johnson, restitution in the amount of 

$495.75; and,

b. Lashundra Cook, Heir of Gloria Johnson, restitution in the amount of 

$495.75.

DONE and ORDERED this 15th day of September, 2016. 

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cr-00130-CG Document 48 Filed 09/15/16 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
23.2
  CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








To the
Board of Directors of


American
Oriental Bioengineering, Inc.





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the foregoing Registration
Statement on Form S-3, of our report dated February 27, 2009, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of American Oriental Bioengineering, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and for each of the two years in the period
ended December 31, 2008, which appears in the American Oriental Bioengineering,
Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2009. We also consent to the
reference to our firm under the caption “Experts”.








/s/ Weinberg &
      Company,
      P.A.
              WEINBERG
      & COMPANY, P.A.
              Certified
      Public Accountants
              
              Boca
      Raton, Florida
              March
      15, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

FRED TURNER, :

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : CIVIL ACTION 14-00599-KD-B

:

JACQUELYN CHESTANG, :

Defendant. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no 

objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(l)(B) and dated April 8, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for 

lack of federal jurisdiction.

DONE and ORDERED this the 27th day of April 2015.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:14-cv-00599-KD-B Document 11 Filed 04/27/15 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 4.1


 





 





ritter pharmaceuticals, inc. Incorporated under the Laws of
the State of delaware authorized: 50,000,000 common shareS, $0.001 PAR Value per share This Certifies That is the owner of Fully
Paid and Non-Assessable Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value of ritter pharmaceuticals, inc. transferable on the books of this Corporation
in person or by attorney upon surrender of this Certificate duly endorsed or assigned. This Certificate and the shares represented
hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Delaware, and to the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the Corporation,
as now or hereafter amended. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent. In witness whereof, the
Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers and to be sealed
with the facsimile seal of the Corporation. Dated: chairman SECRETAR Y Countersigned: corporate Stock Transfer, inc. 3200 Cherry
Creek South Drive, Suite 430 Denver, CO 80209 By Transfer Agent and Registrar Authorized Officer CUSIP 767836 10 9 See reverse
for certain definitions RITTER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. CORPORATE DELAWARE 1000 











    	 



    	 



    

 





 





ritter pharmaceuticals, inc. Corporat e stoc k transfer, inc.
Transfer fee: As required The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be
construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM - as tenants in common
TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - Custodian JT TEN - as joint tenants with right (Cust) (Minor) of survivorship
and not as under Uniform Gifts to Minors tenants in common Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in
the above list. PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNE F OR VALUE RECEIVED,hereby sell, assign and
transfer unto Please Print or typewrite name and address including Postal Zip Code of assignee Shares of the Common Stock represented
by the within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of
the within-named Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated:20, S ignature: X Signature(s) Guaranteed:
S ignature: X THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE
IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE
GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions) WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE
GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
#### Meggan Kruger, Respondent, v Donzelli Realty Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[975 NYS2d 689]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Donzelli Realty Corporation appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated March 30, 2012, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, *898on the law, with costs, and the motion of the defendant Donzelli Realty Corporation for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it is granted.

The plaintiff tripped on an opened sidewalk cellar door and fell into the basement of a building owned by the defendant Donzelli Realty Corporation (hereinafter the appellant). Each of the codefendants leased a street-level commercial space from the appellant and had keys to the sidewalk cellar door.

An owner of property has a duty to maintain his or her premises in a reasonably safe condition *(see Rellman v 45 Tiemann Assoc.,*87 NY2d 871, 872 [1995]; *Basso v Miller,*40 NY2d 233, 241 [1976]). In order for a landowner to be liable in tort to a plaintiff who is injured as a result of an allegedly defective condition upon property, “it must be established that a defective condition existed and that the landowner affirmatively created the condition or had actual or constructive notice of its existence” *(Lezama v 34-15 Parsons Blvd, LLC,*16 AD3d 560, 560 [2005]; *see Fontana v R.H.C. Dev., LLC,*69 AD3d 561 [2010]; *Bodden v Mayfair Supermarkets,*6 AD3d 372, 373 [2004]).

In a premises liability case, a defendant property owner who moves for summary judgment has the initial burden of making a prima facie showing that it neither created the hazardous condition nor had actual or constructive notice of its existence *(see Minor v 1265 Morrison, LLC,*96 AD3d 1024 [2012]; *Alexander v New York City Hous. Auth.,*89 AD3d 969 [2011]; *Birnbaum v New York Racing Assn., Inc.,*57 AD3d 598 [2008]). Here, even assuming that, as alleged by the plaintiff, a hazardous or defective condition existed, the appellant demonstrated, prima facie, that it neither created the condition nor had actual or constructive notice of the condition. Thus, the appellant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The provisions of the Multiple Dwelling Law and the New York City Administrative Code cited by the plaintiff are inapplicable to the facts of this case *(see Juarez v Wavecrest Mgt. Team,*88 NY2d 628, 644 [1996]; *Miki v 335 Madison Ave., LLC,*93 AD3d 407 [2012]; *Fobbs v Rahimzada,*39 AD3d 811 [2007]; *Schiavone v Palumbo,*177 AD2d 1045 [1991]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Rivera, J.E, Dillon, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                 Netegrity, Inc.

                            Certification Pursuant To
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Netegrity, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Regina O. Sommer,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: October 29, 2004                 /s/ Regina O. Sommer
                                      __________________________________________
                                      Regina O. Sommer
                                      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                      (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
                                      Accounting Officer)
#### Price et al. *v.*Pollock et al.

APPEAL from the’ Wayne Common Pleas.

*jf. P. Siddall,*for appellants.

*L. D. Stubbs,*for appellees.

Pettit, J.

This suit was brought by the appellees; against the appellants. There were twenty-three defendants below. All but one stayed in the case to its end. There was a finding and judgment affecting the rights of all, including the one who was not in court, if his interest could be affected by such finding and judgment. Nineteen of the defendants only have appealed and assigned errors, and have not given their co-defendants notice of the appeal, as is-required by sec. 551, 2 G. & H. 270; and for this failure the, appeal is dismissed, at appellants’ costs.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                                                     
|----------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|February 26, 2009 |  | /s/ DAVID T. BLAIR                                  
|                  |  | David T. Blair                                      
|                  |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director                
|                  | 
|                  |  | /s/ HAI V. TRAN                                     
|                  |  | Hai V. Tran                                         
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201700361

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

JEREMY R. HENDERSON

Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Major Terrance J. Reese, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, 2d Assault Amphibian 

Battalion, 2d Marine Division, Camp Lejeune, NC.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Captain Betrand A. 

Pourteau, USMC.

For Appellant: Captain William S. Laragy, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 23 March 2018

_________________________

Before MARKS, WOODARD, and GERDING, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court