alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                  Exhibit 12


COMPUTATIONS OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Quarter Ended
                                                  March 31, 
                                              ------------------
                                                1998      1997
                                              --------  --------
<S>                                           <C>       <C>
Earnings:                                            
      Earnings before income tax expense       $ 9,976   $ 9,246
      Add:                                                
      Interest on advances and other                      
       borrowings                               21,136    17,507
      Interest component of rental                        
       expense                                     556       215
                                               -------   -------
      Earnings before fixed charges                       
       excluding interest on customer                     
       deposits                                 31,668    26,968
      Interest on customer deposits             40,996    19,594
                                               -------   -------
      Earnings before fixed charges            $72,664   $46,562
                                               =======   =======
                                                          
Fixed Charges:                                            
      Interest on advances and other                      
       borrowings                               21,136    17,507
      Interest component of rental                        
       expense                                     556       215
                                               -------   -------
      Fixed charges excluding interest                    
       on customer deposits                     21,692    17,722
      Interest on customer deposits             40,996    19,594
                                               -------   -------
      Total fixed charges                      $62,688   $37,316
                                               =======   =======
                                                          
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        
 including interest on customer deposits         1.16x     1.25x
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        
 excluding interest on customer deposits         1.46x     1.52x
 
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32 (a)

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Enzo  Biochem,  Inc.,  and
Subsidiaries ("the Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Elazar Rabbani,  Ph.D.,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


        (2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


         /s/  Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.







         Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.
         Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David K.
Spohr, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of World Monitor Trust II  Series E for the period January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Registrant.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                                                                                                                                                           
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David K. Spohr
|Name:              |  | David K. Spohr                                                                                                                                                                            
|Title:             |  | Senior Vice President and Director of Fund Administration (Principal Financial/Accounting Officer) Kenmar
Preferred Investments Corp., Managing Owner of World Monitor Trust II  Series E
|                   | 
|Date:              |  | March 25, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD HOLLINGSWORTH, #276260, *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

vs. * CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-00480-WS-B

*

KIM T. THOMAS, et al., *

*

Defendants. *

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue 

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this 

Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Carroll and Byrd be dismissed 

without prejudice from this action, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

DONE this 22nd day of August, 2014.

 s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00480-WS-B Document 24 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40297

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MIGUEL MIRELES-ANZURES,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-97-CR-467-1

- - - - - - - - - -

January 5,1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Miguel Mireles-Anzures appeals from his guilty-plea

conviction and sentence for being found illegally in the United

States subsequent to deportation. He argues that the record of

the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 colloquy is devoid of any personal

affirmative answers by him concerning his knowing and voluntary

waiver of his constitutional rights. He contends that appellate

review to ascertain the voluntariness of his plea is impossible

because the transcript of rearraignment does not reflect his own 
No. 98-40297

-2-

responses to the court’s questions concerning Mireles-Anzures’

understanding of the constitutional rights waived by pleading

guilty. Mireles-Anzures asserts that this method violates the

purposes underlying Rule 11, and, thus, his conviction should be

reversed.

Mireles-Anzures does not contend that he did not understand

that by pleading guilty, he was waiving certain constitutional

rights. Because he does not contend that his plea was

involuntary, he has not identified any error that harmed him for

this court to consider as reversible error. See Fed. R. Crim. P.

11(h), 52(b).

AFFIRMED.
**TKP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 1 9
- 0218 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SHANE THOMAS PELLETIER ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a n extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including March 30 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s response .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 12 2020

03/12/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0218
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Alan B. LevanName:
    
    Alan B. LevanTitle:
    
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    November 17, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1                         
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                         24,063
<SECURITIES>                                   54,171
<RECEIVABLES>                                 305,912
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              517,382
<PP&E>                                        311,410
<DEPRECIATION>                                254,463
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              5,122,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       3,115,602
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                     5,000
<COMMON>                                        9,062
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,992,688
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                5,122,352
<SALES>                                       492,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              492,320
<CGS>                                         333,790
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 246,164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             87,169
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,588,605
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,588,605
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                1,588,605
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.11

        



</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of California Coastal Communities, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),each of the undersigned, in their respective capacity as an officer, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their respectiveknowledge, that:

 

•                  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and 

 

•                  the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: November 5, 2007                             |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                |   |
| /s/ Raymond J. Pacini                               |   |
| Raymond J. Pacini                                   |   |
| Chief Executive Officer                             |   |
|                                                |   |
| /s/ Sandra G. Sciutto                               |   |
| Sandra G. Sciutto                                   |   |
| Senior Vice President  and  Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Shelter
Properties I Limited Partnership 1997 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000316220
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,729
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          19,395
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,103
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         11,540
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,407)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,611
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,250
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,040
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 241
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       210
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    13.84<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JONATHAN D. GARRISON, 

 #190475

)

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION 14-0069-CG-B

)

CYNTHIA STEWART, )

)

Respondent. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of the issues raised, and 

there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 

made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated August 4, 2016, is adopted as the 

opinion of this Court.

 DONE and ORDERED this 30th day of August, 2016.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00069-CG-B Document 12 Filed 08/30/16 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of BTU
International, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

      1.    the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
            ended March 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                       /S/ Thomas P. Kealy
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Thomas P. Kealy
                                       Vice President, Corporate Controller
                                       and Chief Accounting Officer (principal
                                       financial and accounting officer)

Dated:  May 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to BTU International, Inc. and will be retained by BTU International,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Caroline Stecker, adm’x v. William C. Smith et al.

*Partnership liability*— Question *of fact.*

Where several persons put up a building as partners, and one of them buys brick for the purpose without an express understanding with the vendor that it is an individual purchase, and the brick is actually used in the building, the partners are liable as such for its value.

In an action against several defendants impleaded as partners, the plaintiff is entitled to lay all the facts before the jury and have their opinion as to whether the transaction was not that of a partnership, or did not, at least, entitle plaintiff to charge defendants as partners.

Error to Wayne.

Submitted April 6.

Decided April 13.

Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

Reversed.

*James H. Pound*for plaintiff in error.

*Atkinson & Atkinson*for defendants in error.

Graves, J.

Plaintiff’s intestate brought *assumpsit*against the defendants as copartners before a justice of the peace to recover for certain brick furnished them. A recovery was allowed in that court and defendants appealed, but prior to the trial in the circuit court Mr. Stecker died and the plaintiff was duly authorized to assume the prosecution of the action. On the hearing of the case the circuit judge directed a verdict for the defendants. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants were partners in putting up two certain buildings, and that the bricks were procured by the firm for those buildings and actually used as materials therein.

A witness 'for the’ plaintiff testified that one of the defendants contracted individually for the brick, and another witness on the same side testified that one of the defendants admitted that brick were received, but that they were *15on Ms own account and not for the partnersMp. The plaintiff then offered to show that the defendants were in partnership in putting up the buildings for which the brick were obtained and in which they were used, but the court on objection excluded the evidence.

This was error. The statement made by the witness that the brick were purchased by one of the defendants on his individual account, was not necessarily conclusive. In the first place it was more matter of opinion than of fact, as represented by the record. But in any court the plaintiff was entitled to lay all the facts before the jury and have their judgment on the question whether the purchase was not a partnership transaction, or at least one wMch entitled the plamtiff to charge the defendants as partners. If in point of fact they were erecting the buildings as partners, and one of them procured the brick for the purpose of the buildings without any express arrangement with plaintiff’s intestate that the purchase was an individual purchase, and the brick were used in the buildings, the firm was hable.

The judgment is reversed with costs and a new trial granted.

The other Justices concurred.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 
 
 Docket Nos.Origin Wind Energy, LLC
EG14-92-000Beech Ridge Energy LLC
EG14-93-000Beech Ridge Energy II LLC
EG14-94-000Beech Ridge Energy Storage LLC
EG14-95-000Tonopah Solar Energy, LLC
EG14-96-000Spring Canyon Interconnection LLC
EG14-97-000Spring Canyon Energy III LLC
EG14-98-000Spring Canyon Energy II LLC
EG14-99-000Spring Canyon Energy LLC
EG14-100-000Seiling Wind Interconnection Services, LLC
EG14-101-000Hoopeston Wind LLC
EG14-102-000Calpine Fore River Energy Center, LLC
EG14-103-000Solar Star California XIII, LLC
EG14-104-000Indeck Wharton, LLC
EG14-105-000Palo Duro Wind Interconnection Services, LLC
EG14-106-000Rattlesnake Wind I LLC
EG14-107-000Roundtop Energy LLC
EG14-108-000Bornish Wind, LP
FC14-16-000Kerwood Wind, LP
FC14-17-000
 Take notice that during the month of November 2014, the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a). Dated: December 8, 2014. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2014-29705 Filed 12-18-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P