alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.14
 FOUNDRY NETWORKS, INC.
1996 STOCK PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT
 Agreement  Company  Purchaser
 Sale of Stock .  Shares   Shares
 Closing.
 Closing Closing Date
  Limitations on Transfer .
 Repurchase Option .
 Termination Date Repurchase Option




---



##### 



Escrow of Unvested Shares . Exhibit A
 Taxation Representations .
 Restrictive Legends and Stop-Transfer Orders .
 Legends .
 (i)
    
    THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS
CERTIFICATE ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER
HELD BY THE ISSUER OR ITS ASSIGNEE(S) AS SET FORTH IN THE
RESTRICTED STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ISSUER AND THE
ORIGINAL HOLDER OF THESE SHARES, A COPY OF WHICH MAY BE
OBTAINED AT THE PRINCIPAL OFFICE OF THE ISSUER. SUCH TRANSFER
RESTRICTIONS ARE BINDING ON TRANSFEREES OF THESE SHARES.
 Stop-Transfer Notices .




---



##### 



Refusal to Transfer .
 No Employment Rights .
 Miscellaneous .
 Governing Law .
 Entire Agreement; Enforcement of Rights .
 Severability .
 Construction .




---



##### 



Notices .
 Counterparts .
 Successors and Assigns .




---



##### 



FOUNDRY NETWORKS, INC.By:Title:PURCHASER:(Signature)Address:




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 ASSIGNMENT SEPARATE FROM CERTIFICATE
 Purchaser   Agreement
 
 Signature:PurchaserSpouse of Purchaser (if applicable)




---



##### 



ASSIGNMENT SEPARATE FROM CERTIFICATE
 Purchaser  Agreement
 
 Signature:PurchaserSpouse of Purchaser (if applicable)




---



##### 



RECEIPT AND CONSENT
 Company
  
 Purchaser
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JAMES GIBSON, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 14-00042-WS-N

WANDA LIGHTNER, et al :

Defendants. :

 

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be and is hereby 

DISMISSED without prejudice. 

DONE this 28th day of January, 2015.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Case 1:14-cv-00042-WS-N Document 13 Filed 01/28/15 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 21.1**

 
| **Gaiam Subsidiaries**         |   | **State or Country of Incorporation or Registration** |
|--------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Gaiam Americas, Inc.           |   | State of Colorado                                     |
| Gaiam.com, Inc.                |   | State of Colorado                                     |
| Gaiam Direct, Inc.             |   | State of Colorado                                     |
| Gaiam Energy Tech, Inc.        |   | State of Colorado                                     |
| Gaiam International, Inc.      |   | State of Colorado                                     |
| Gaiam International II, Inc.   |   | State of Colorado                                     |
| Gaiam International III, Inc.  |   | State of Colorado                                     |
| Gaiam Media, Inc.              |   | State of Colorado                                     |
| Gaiam Shared Services, Inc.    |   | State of Colorado                                     |
| Gaiam Travel, Inc.             |   | State of Colorado                                     |
| Gaiam West, Inc.               |   | State of California                                   |
| Real Goods Trading Corporation |   | State of California                                   |
| Gaiam International C.V.       |   | The Netherlands                                       |
| Gaiam International B.V.       |   | The Netherlands                                       |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

HARDY DEVAN TOLBERT, JR., :

AIS 160902,

:

Petitioner,

:

vs. CA 14-0407-WS-C

:

KARLA JONES,

:

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED,

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that petitioner’s request for habeas corpus relief, 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, be dismissed as time-barred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2244(d). Alternatively, this Court is procedurally barred from reaching the merit of the 

claim petitioner has raised in the instant habeas corpus petition. Tolbert is not entitled 

to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, he is not entitled to appeal in forma 

pauperis.

DONE this 13th day of February, 2015.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00407-WS-C Document 16 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 1
ex4-1.htm


EXHIBIT 4.1


 


SPECIMEN


 


INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA


 



	
NUMBER

	
SHARES


	
____________

	
___________












 


This certifies that _________________________________________________________  is the owner of  ___________________________ full paid and non-assessable


 


SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK OF SADIYA TRANSPORT, INC.


 


transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon the surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.


 


The corporation will furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests the powers, designations and relative, participating optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preference and/or rights.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the Seal of the Corporation, this _______ day of ___________, A.D.


 







 



	 	 	 	 
	
Altaf S. Shariff, Secretary

	 	 	
Altaf S. Shariff, President
11135.

#### Pittman *et al. v.*Dorsey, Governor.

Forfeiture of recognizance; from Fannin superior court—'Judge Morris. October 22, 1919.

*Clay & Giles,*for plaintiffs in error.

*John T. Dorsey, solicitor-general, William Butt,*contra.

Stephens, J.

1. Motions for continuance being addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge, and the evidence in this case adduced upon the hearing of a motion for continuance being conflicting, the trial judge did not err in refusing to continue the case.

2. Where a scire facias issues against a principal and a surety upon a forfeited recognizance, the mere tender of additional bail, unaccepted and unapproved, is no defense against a final judgment. See, in this connection, Penal Code (1910), § 960; *Griffin*v. *Moore,*2 *Ga.*331; *Williams*v. *Jenkins,*53 *Ga.*166.

3. The trial judge, without the intervention of a jury, properly entered judgment absolute against the principal and the surety.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*
#### Lee *v.*The State.

Criminal *Law.—Pleading.—Former*Conviction.—In all criminal prosecutions, the defendant, under amoral plea of the general issue, may show a former conviction for the same offence.

APPEAL from the Huntington Common Pleas.

*B. M. Cobb*and *B. F. Hendrix,*for appellant.

*J. C. Denny,*Attorney General, and *B.*71 *Ibach,*for the State.

Downey, J.

This was an information against the appellant for an assault and battery, committed on one Westhofer. The defendant, on arraignment, pleaded the -general issue orally, and on the trial offered in evidence'the judgment of a justice of the peace, with parol evidence of the identity of the defendant and of the crime, to show a former conviction for the same offence. This evidence was rejected by the court, on the objection of the State. We see no objection to the admissibility of this evidence, and the Attorney General states in a brief, filed in the case, that he has examined it and is satisfied that the court erred ,in refusing to allow the defendant to read the record in evidence. The defendant may prove a former conviction under the general issue, pleaded orally. 2 G. & H. 413, sec. 97. *Clem*v. *The State, post,*p. 420.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.
Exhibit 32

Section 1350 Certifications

Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer
of Beckman Coulter, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the
accompanying quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to
accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



|                       |  |  |  |                                 
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------
|Date: November 5, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Scott Garrett               
|                       |  |  |  | Scott Garrett                   
|                       |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board, President
|                       |  |  |  | and Chief Executive Officer     



---

Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Beckman
Coulter, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying
quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 5, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Charles P. Slacik  
|                       |  |  |  | Charles P. Slacik      
|                       |  |  |  | Senior Vice President &
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas P. Kealy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BTU International,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 19, 2004

                               /S/ Thomas P. Kealy
                               -------------------

                                 Thomas P. Kealy
        Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
ISRAEL JAMES

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 1874

___________ __________________/

Opinion filed November 4, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Michael G. Allen , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela J o Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. ("CRM")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lawrence
Fensterstock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                          By: /s/ Lawrence Fensterstock
                                                  Lawrence Fensterstock
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

August 15, 2005

                                       23
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MICHAEL SMITH, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION 05-0426-BH-D

 )

TOM TATE, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to

the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is

ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is

hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. 

DONE this 14th day of December, 2005.

 s/ W. B. Hand 

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00426-BH-D Document 7 Filed 12/14/05 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on Rules of Appellate Procedure.

# ACTION:

Notice of cancellation of public hearing.

# SUMMARY:

                        The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the Federal                               ( print page 76371)                            Rules of Appellate Procedure has been canceled: Appellate Rules Hearing, January 9, 2015, in Phoenix, Arizona. Announcements for this meeting were previously published in 79 FR 48250 and 79 FR 72702.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jonathan C. Rose, Secretary and Chief Rules Officer, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: December 16, 2014.

Jonathan C. Rose,

Secretary and Chief Rules Officer.

[FR Doc. 2014-29793 Filed 12-19-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in 

the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the 

citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computergenerated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of 

Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

No. A-1-CA-41489

HOLLY CHARLEY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

DEAUNTAE RICHARDS,

Respondent-Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MCKINLEY COUNTY

Douglas W. Decker, District Court Judge

New Mexico Legal Aid, Inc.

Lucrecia R. Jaramillo

Albuquerque, NM

for Appellant

Deauntae Richards

Gallup, NM

Pro Se Appellee

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BOGARDUS, Judge.

{1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed 

summary disposition. No memorandum opposing the proposed disposition has been 

filed, and the time for doing so has expired. REVERSED.

{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge
WE CONCUR:

MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge

SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 165 DB 2022 (No. 4 RST 2023)

:

JENNIFER ROSA PEREZ : Attorney Registration No. 315583

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION : (Out of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of January, 2023, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated January 13, 2023, is approved and it is ORDERED that

JENNIFER ROSA PEREZ, who has been on Administrative Suspension, has 

demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law 

required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby 

reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses 

incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by 

the Petitioner.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Shelter
Properties I Limited Partnership 1999 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000316220
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES I LIMITED PARTNESHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,477
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      290
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          20,652
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         11,314
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,016)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,859
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,692
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,013
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 474
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       679
<EPS-BASIC>                                    44.80<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>