alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-03-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                           369,214
<SECURITIES>                                      50,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,182,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,788,723
<INVENTORY>                                    4,249,445
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,848,588
<PP&E>                                        21,594,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                10,270,115
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                35,143,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         48,861,584
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           1,973
<OTHER-SE>                                      (583,393)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  48,861,584
<SALES>                                        6,072,282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,072,282
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,384,292
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (20,761)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               844,340
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (2,467,946)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2,467,946)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,467,946)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.63)



</TABLE>
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-20702

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

ALVIN PRINCE JONES,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas, Houston

(H-97-CR-38-1)

November 6, 1998

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. See 5th R.

47.6.
<PAGE> 1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

    The following is a list of the Company's subsidiaries as of December 31,
1995, except for unnamed subsidiaries which, considered in the aggregate as a
single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION
                                                                              Percentage of
                                                                               Voting Power
                                                                                Owned by
                                                                                Monsanto
                                                                              -------------

<S>                                                                        <C>
G. D. Searle & Co. (Delaware Corporation).................................        100

Monsanto Europe, S.A. (Belgian Corporation)...............................        100

Monsanto International Holdings, Inc.
    (Delaware Corporation)................................................        100

Monsanto International Sales Company, Inc.
    (Virgin Islands Corporation)..........................................        100

Monsanto p.l.c. (United Kingdom Corporation)..............................        100
</TABLE>

                                       22
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD HOLLINGSWORTH, #276260, *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

vs. * CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-00480-WS-B

*

KIM T. THOMAS, et al., *

*

Defendants. *

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue 

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this 

Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Carroll and Byrd be dismissed 

without prejudice from this action, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

DONE this 30th day of May, 2014.

 s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00480-WS-B Document 11 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-04-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-04-1997
<CASH>                                          14,477
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,230
<ALLOWANCES>                                       909
<INVENTORY>                                      9,804
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,639
<PP&E>                                           4,704
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,087
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,318
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,160
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,256
<SALES>                                         49,948
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,917
<CGS>                                           40,644
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,418
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    75
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 771
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,252
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,071)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,181
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,181
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($3.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($3.35)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 243 (Thursday, December 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 75555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29644]



[[Page 75555]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than January 2, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Gregory Jackson, Detroit, Michigan, individually, and together 
as a group acting in concert with Roy S. Roberts, Bloomfield Hills, 
Michigan; to acquire voting shares of First Independence Corporation, 
and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of First Independence 
Bank, both in Detroit, Michigan.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Michael K. Pearson and Keith W. Pearson, both of Hobbs, New 
Mexico; collectively as a group acting in concert, to acquire voting 
shares of Lea County Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire 
voting shares of Lea County State Bank, both in Hobbs, New Mexico.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 15, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-29644 Filed 12-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### Anthony F. WOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-2581.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 27, 2001.

Decided May 3, 2001.

Anthony F. Wood, pro se. Kent Pendleton Porter, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*90PER CURIAM.

Anthony F. Wood appeals the district court’s order denying relief in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Wood v. Apfel,*No. CA-00-289-2 (E.D.Va. Oct. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40272 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GLENN EARL SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:96CR110-1

- - - - - - - - - - November 16, 1998 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Glen Earl Scott appeals from his conviction by jury verdict for two counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base. Scott contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. Because Scott moved for a judgment of acquittal at the close of the Government’s evidence and in a postverdict motion, we view all of the evidence and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the Government and affirm the verdict only if a rational trier ofNo. 98-40272 -2- fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Brown , 29 F.3d 953, 958 (5th Cir. 1994); see also United States v. Cheramie , 51 F.3d 538, 542 (5th Cir. 1995). The Government must prove three elements in order to sustain a conviction for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance: (1) the defendant knowingly (2) possessed the controlled substance (3) with the intent to distribute. United States v. Lopez , 979 F.2d 1024, 1031 (5th Cir. 1992). Based on the substantial amount of testimonial evidence indicating that Scott had actually dispensed a quantity of crack cocaine to an undercover police officer on one occasion and had possessed a pill bottle filled with approximately 25 rocks of crack cocaine when arrested for public intoxication, a rational jury could have found that Scott had knowingly possessed the cocaine base with intent to distribute on both occasions. AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 72683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28844]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

TIME AND DATE:  10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) December 15, 2014 
(Telephonic).

PLACE:  10th Floor Board Meeting Room, 77 K Street NE., Washington, DC 
20002.

STATUS:  Parts will be open to the public and parts will be closed to 
the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

 Open to the Public

1. Approval of the Minutes of the November 17, 2014 Board Member 
Meeting
2. Thrift Savings Plan Monthly Reports
    a. Monthly Participant Activity Report
    b. Monthly Investment Policy Report
    c. Legislative Report
3. Office of the General Counsel Update

Closed to the Public

4. Personnel

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office 
of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: December 4, 2014.
James Petrick,
General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-28844 Filed 12-4-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wniteb $>tates {[ourt of ~peaIs

for tbe jfeberaI {[ircuit

DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

COMPUSEARCH SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2012-5129

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in

case no. 12-CV-274, Judge George W. Miller.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Case: 12-5129 Document: 36 Page: 1 Filed: 10/18/2012
DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS, INC. V. US 2

Upon consideration of Distributed Solutions, Inc.'s

unopposed motion for leave to file its initial brief out of

time,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) The brief is accepted for filing.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

s23

Case: 12-5129 Document: 36 Page: 2 Filed: 10/18/2012
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Principal
                  Financial Officer of Southern First Bancshares, Inc. (the "company"),
                  each certify that, to his knowledge on the date of this certification: 1. The annual report of the company for the period ended December 31,
                  2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this
                  date (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
                  of the company.  Date: March 5, 2013
                           
                           
                           By:
                           
                           
                           /s/R. Arthur Seaver, Jr.R. Arthur Seaver, Jr.Chief Executive Officer   Date: March 5, 2013
                           
                           
                           By:
                           
                           
                           /s/Michael D. DowlingMichael D. DowlingChief Financial Officer,
                              Principal Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-20191

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jesus Guerrero-Ortiz,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:20-CR-573-1

Before Southwick, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus GuerreroOrtiz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Guerrero-Ortiz has not filed a response. We have 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 12, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-20191 Document: 00516505605 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/12/2022
No. 21-20191

2

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for 

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. 

R. 42.2.

Case: 21-20191 Document: 00516505605 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/12/2022
#### Samuel Finley *v.*Paul B. Russell & Wife.

Husband and Wife — Rent of Wife’s Real Estate.

Where the husband rents the wife’s real estate for not more than three years at a time and receives the rent in goods, the receipt of such goods pays the rent whether the wife consents thereto or not.

Wife’s Money.

If the wife’s money is borrowed of her or of her. husband acting as her agent, the borrower cannot afterward be heard to say that the money belonged to the husband, nor can he be allowed to credit the same on the husband’s indebtedness to him.

APPEAL FROM MARION CIRCUIT COURT.

September 9, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

The instructions in this case are erroneous so far as they apply to the right of the husband to appropriate the rents due from the lands of the wife. If the husband rented the house and lot, and at the time agreed with the renter to take goods from him in satisfaction of the rent, and the goods were taken or purchased by the husband under the contract, it was to that extent a payment of the rent, whether the rent was credited on the account or not. Sec. I, Act 2, Husband and Wife, provides that the husband may rent the real estate of the wife for not more than three years at a time, and receive the rents, etc. If, then, the contract of renting was made, he paid in goods, and the goods were delivered, it was a payment on the rent whether the wife consented or not.

The rent of the wife’s land will not be subjected to the payment of the husband’s debts, but when the husband has already rented the land (if not for a longer time than three years) and received the rent, whether in money or property, the wife cannot afterwards assert a claim for it, against the tenant. As to the money of the wife, if borrowed by the appellant, of her or her husband, as her *37agent, with a promise to pay the wife, and a recognition of it by the borrower, as here, he will not be allowed afterwards to say that it belongs to the husband, or to credit it on the latter’s indebtedness. We see no error in the instruction in this branch of the case nor any error in regard to the question made as to the improvements on the wife’s property.

*W. B. Harrison, for appellant.*

*J. R. Thomas, for appellees.*

The judgment, however, for the reason indicated, is *reversed*and cause remanded with directions to award the appellant a new trial and for the further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES



|                                          |  |                       
|----------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Name                                      |  | State of Incorporation
|R/XxPharmacy Solutions,
Inc.              |  | Arizona               
|HealthExtras Benefits Administrator, Inc. |  | Delaware              
|U.S. Scripts, Inc.                        |  | Delaware              
|Managed Healthcare Systems, Inc.          |  | Florida               
|APS Benefits Corporation.                 |  | Maryland              
|Catalyst Consultants                      |  | Nevada                
|Catalyst Rx                               |  | Nevada                
|Catalyst Rx Government Services, Inc.     |  | Nevada                
|Catalyst PRx, LLC                         |  | Nevada                
|Catalyst PRx Government Services, LLC     |  | Nevada                
|Catalyst Rx IPA, Inc.                     |  | New York
##### 



Doral Financial Corporation
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
 For the year endedMarch 31, 2007Including Interest on DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax income from continuing operations
    
    $
    (31,415
    )Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    119,879Total Earnings
    
    $
    88,464Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    118,905Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized
expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    179An estimate of the interest component within rental expense
    
    
    795Total Fixed Charges before preferred dividends
    
    
    119,879Preferred dividends
    
    
    8,325Ratio of pre tax income to net income
    
    
    0.842.Preferred dividend factor
    
    
    7,010Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    126,889Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
    
    
    (A
    )Excluding Interest on DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax income from continuing operations
    
    $
    (31,415
    )Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    77,091Total Earnings
    
    $
    45,676Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    76,117Amortized
premiums, discounts, and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    179An estimate of the interest component within rental expense
    
    
    795Total Fixed Charges before preferred dividends
    
    
    77,091Preferred dividend factor
    
    
    7,010Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    84,101Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
    
    
    (A
    )
 
 (A)
    
    Due to the Companys pre-tax loss the ratio coverage was less than 1:1.
ACCEPTED

01-15-00660-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

8/4/2015 8:30:44 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/4/2015 8:30:44 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk