76432 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2014 / Notices 

15 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(d)(11). 

16 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 

17 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(4)(ii). 

18See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34– 

73615 (Nov. 17, 2014), 79 FR 69545 (Nov. 21, 2014) 

(SR–CME–2014–49). The only exception is with 

regards to Restructuring European Single Name 

CDS Contracts created following the occurrence of 

a Restructuring Credit Event in respect of an iTraxx 

Component Transaction. The clearing of 

Restructuring European Single Name CDS Contracts 

will be a necessary byproduct after such time that 

CME begins clearing iTraxx Europe index CDS. 

19 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 

4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 

meeting its obligations in the event of 

clearing member insolvencies or 

defaults, in accordance with Rule 

17Ad–22(d)(11).15

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

CME does not believe that the 

proposed rule change will have any 

impact, or impose any burden, on 

competition. The proposed rule change 

reflects enhancements to CME’s CDS 

Risk Model. Consequently, CME does 

not believe that the proposed rule 

changes would significantly affect the 

ability of Clearing Members or other 

market participants to continue to clear 

CDS, consistent with the risk 

management requirements of CME, or 

otherwise limit market participants’ 

choices for selecting clearing services. 

For the foregoing reasons, the Proposed 

CDS Risk Model does not, in CME’s 

view, impose any unnecessary or 

inappropriate burden on competition. 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants, or Others 

Written comments relating to the 

Proposed CDS Risk Model have not 

been solicited or received. CME will 

notify the Commission of any written 

comments received by CME. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

The foregoing rule change has become 

effective upon filing pursuant to Section 

19(b)(3)(A) 16 of the Act and Rule 19b– 

4(f)(4)(ii) 17 thereunder. 

CME asserts that this proposal 

constitutes a change in an existing 

service of CME that (a) primarily affects 

the clearing operations of CME with 

respect to products that are not 

securities, including futures that are not 

security futures, and swaps that are not 

security-based swaps or mixed swaps, 

and forwards that are not security 

forwards; and (b) does not significantly 

affect any securities clearing operations 

of CME or any rights or obligations of 

CME with respect to securities clearing 

or persons using such securities-clearing 

service, which renders the proposed 

change effective upon filing. CME 

believes that the proposal does not 

significantly affect any securities 

clearing operations of CME because 

CME recently filed a proposed rule 

change that clarified that CME has 

decided not to clear security-based 

swaps, except in a very limited set of 

circumstances.18 The rule filing 

reflecting CME’s decision not to clear 

security-based swaps removed any 

ambiguity concerning CME’s ability or 

intent to perform the functions of a 

clearing agency with respect to securitybased swaps. Therefore, this proposal 

will not have an effect on any securities 

clearing operations of CME. 

At any time within 60 days of the 

filing of the proposed change, the 

Commission summarily may 

temporarily suspend such rule change if 

it appears to the Commission that such 

action is necessary or appropriate in the 

public interest, for the protection of 

investors, or otherwise in furtherance of 

the purposes of the Act. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/

rules/sro.shtml), or 

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include File No. SR– 

CME–2014–51 on the subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Secretary, Securities and Exchange 

Commission, 100 F Street NE., 

Washington, DC 20549. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–CME–2014–51. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if email is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for Web site viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 

Washington, DC 20549, on official 

business days between the hours of 

10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such 

filing also will be available for 

inspection and copying at the principal 

office of CME and on CME’s Web site at 

http://www.cmegroup.com/marketregulation/rule-filings.html. 

All comments received will be posted 

without change; the Commission does 

not edit personal identifying 

information from submissions. You 

should submit only information that 

you wish to make available publicly. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–CME–2014–51 and should 

be submitted on or before January 12, 

2015. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.19

Kevin M. O’Neill, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29818 Filed 12–19–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–73845; File No. SR–BATS– 

2014–066] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS 

Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and 

Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed 

Rule Change Related to Fees for Use 

of BATS Exchange, Inc. 

December 16, 2014. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 

‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on December 

3, 2014, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the 

‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BATS’’) filed with the 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule 

change as described in Items I, II, and 

III below, which Items have been 

prepared by the Exchange. The 

Exchange has designated the proposed 

rule change as one establishing or 

changing a member due, fee, or other 

charge imposed by the Exchange under 

Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 3 and 

Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which 

renders the proposed rule change 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2014 / Notices 76433 

5A Member is defined as ‘‘any registered broker 

or dealer that has been admitted to membership in 

the Exchange.’’ See Exchange Rule 1.5(n). 

effective upon filing with the 

Commission. The Commission is 

publishing this notice to solicit 

comments on the proposed rule change 

from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of the Substance 

of the Proposed Rule Change 

The Exchange filed a proposal to 

amend the fee schedule applicable to 

Members 5 and non-members of the 

Exchange pursuant to BATS Rules 

15.1(a) and (c). Changes to the fee 

schedule pursuant to this proposal are 

effective upon filing. 

The text of the proposed rule change 

is available at the Exchange’s Web site 

at http://www.batstrading.com, at the 

principal office of the Exchange, and at 

the Commission’s Public Reference 

Room. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

Exchange included statements 

concerning the purpose of and basis for 

the proposed rule change and discussed 

any comments it received on the 

proposed rule change. The text of these 

statements may be examined at the 

places specified in Item IV below. The 

Exchange has prepared summaries, set 

forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of 

the most significant parts of such 

statements. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The Exchange proposes to make a 

number of clarifying, non-substantive 

changes to the ‘‘Options Pricing’’ 

section of its fee schedule effective 

immediately, in order to convert the 

existing fee schedule into a chart format. 

The Exchange has already made similar 

changes to the equities portion of the fee 

schedule and is now proposing to make 

such changes as they relate to the fees 

and rebates applicable to activity on the 

Exchange’s options platform (‘‘BATS 

Options’’). The Exchange believes that 

these changes will provide greater 

transparency to Members about how the 

Exchange assesses fees and calculates 

rebates, as well as allowing Members to 

more easily validate their bills on a 

monthly basis. The Exchange notes that 

none of these changes substantively 

amend any fee or rebate, nor do they 

alter the manner in which the Exchange 

assesses fees or calculates rebates. 

Specifically, the Exchange is proposing 

the following: 

• To more clearly separate pricing 

applicable to BATS Options from the 

Exchange’s current fee schedule, which 

will remain applicable to the Exchange’s 

equities trading platform (‘‘BATS 

Equities’’). Although the Exchange has 

always maintained a single fee schedule 

applicable to BATS Options and BATS 

Equities, the Exchange believes that 

separating the fee schedules will reduce 

potential confusion. Accordingly, in 

addition to the header of the fee 

schedule, the Exchange proposes to 

adopt a new effective date for the 

proposed BATS Options fee schedule 

but to retain the existing effective date 

for BATS Equities pricing. 

• To make clear that rebates are 

indicated by parentheses. 

• To state the following: The rates 

listed in the Standard Rates table apply 

unless a Member’s transaction is 

assigned a fee code other than a 

standard fee code. If a Member’s 

transaction is assigned a fee code other 

than a standard fee code, the rates listed 

in the Fee Codes and Associated Fees 

table will apply. Footnotes provide 

further explanatory text or, where 

annotated to fee codes, indicate variable 

rate changes, provided the conditions in 

the footnote are met. 

• To add a section and chart titled 

‘‘Standard Rates,’’ which will include 

the standard fees and rebates for Penny 

Pilot securities, Non-Penny Pilot 

securities, and Mini Options for each 

order capacity, including Customer, 

Professional, Firm, and Market Maker. 

• To add a section titled ‘‘Fee Codes 

and Associated Fees,’’ which will 

include the fee or rebate, fee code, and 

a description for each possible 

execution that could occur on the 

Exchange or on another venue. 

• To add a section titled 

‘‘Definitions,’’ which will include 

definitions that are defined in the 

current fee schedule. These include the 

definitions listed below, which are 

identical to definitions contained on the 

Exchange’s current fee schedule, with 

the exception that the Exchange has 

combined the definitions of Options 

Step-Up Add TCV and September 

Options Step-Up Add TCV into Options 

Step-Up Add TCV without specifying a 

baseline month. Instead, the Exchange 

has proposed to specify the baseline 

month in the portion of the fee schedule 

where the Options Step-Up Add TCV is 

applicable, which the Exchange believes 

will help to avoid potential confusion 

between applicable step-up tiers. 

‘‘ADAV’’ means average daily added 

volume calculated as the number of 

contracts added and ‘‘ADV’’ means 

average daily volume calculated as the 

number of contracts added or removed, 

combined, per day. ADAV and ADV are 

calculated on a monthly basis, 

excluding contracts added or removed 

on any day that the Exchange’s system 

experiences a disruption that lasts for 

more than 60 minutes during regular 

trading hours (‘‘Exchange System 

Disruption’’) and on any day with a 

scheduled early market close. Routed 

contracts are not included in ADAV or 

ADV calculation. With prior notice to 

the Exchange, a Member may aggregate 

ADAV or ADV with other Members that 

control, are controlled by, or are under 

common control with such Member. 

‘‘Options Step-Up Add TCV’’ means 

ADAV as a percentage of TCV in the 

relevant baseline month subtracted from 

current ADAV as a percentage of TCV. 

‘‘TCV’’ means total consolidated volume 

calculated as the volume reported by all 

exchanges to the consolidated 

transaction reporting plan for the month 

for which the fees apply, excluding 

volume on any day that the Exchange 

experiences an Exchange System 

Disruption and on any day with a 

scheduled early market close. 

‘‘Customer’’ applies to any transaction 

identified by a Member for clearing in 

the Customer range at the Options 

Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’), 

excluding any transaction for a 

‘‘Professional’’ as defined in Exchange 

Rule 16.1. ‘‘Firm’’ applies to any 

transaction identified by a Member for 

clearing in the Firm range at the OCC. 

‘‘Market Maker’’ applies to any 

transaction identified by a Member for 

clearing in the Market Maker range at 

the OCC. ‘‘Professional’’ applies to any 

transaction identified by a Member as 

such pursuant to Exchange Rule 16.1. 

‘‘Penny Pilot Securities’’ are those 

issues quoted pursuant to Exchange 

Rule 21.5, Interpretation and Policy .01. 

• To add a section titled ‘‘General 

Notes,’’ that will include the following 

notes: The Exchange notes that to the 

extent a Member does not qualify for 

any of the tiers listed below, the rates 

listed in the above section titled Fee 

Codes and Associated Fees will apply; 

and to the extent a Member qualifies for 

higher rebates and/or lower fees than 

those provided by a tier for which such 

Member qualifies, the higher rebates 

and/or lower fees shall apply. 

• To add a series of footnotes 

describing all tiers applicable to trading 

on BATS Options, including Customer 

Penny Pilot Add Tiers, Professional and 

Firm Penny Pilot Add Tier, 

Professional, Firm and Market Maker 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
76434 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2014 / Notices 

6System is defined in BATS Rule 1.5(aa) and 

16.1(a)(59). 

7 15 U.S.C. 78f. 

8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 

9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 

10 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 

Penny Pilot Take Tier, NBBO Setter 

Tiers, and Quoting Incentive Program 

Tiers. 

To add new sections and charts titled 

‘‘Options Logical Port Fees’’ and 

‘‘Options Physical Connection Fees,’’ 

which, other than being in chart form, 

will be identical to the current fee 

schedule. As it relates to physical 

connection fees, the Exchange notes that 

such fees relate only to the total number 

of physical connections that a Member 

has to the Systems.6 More specifically, 

this means that to the extent that a 

Member has a physical connection to 

the Exchange that they use for the 

purpose of connecting to both BATS 

Equities and BATS Options Systems, 

such Member would only be charged for 

one physical connection. Although this 

information is duplicative, the Exchange 

believes it is important with the 

proposed bifurcation of fees applicable 

to BATS Equities and BATS Options to 

include connectivity fees on the fee 

schedule for BATS Options so that 

Members that have their only or primary 

relationship with BATS Options have 

easy access to information regarding 

such fees. 

2. Statutory Basis 

The Exchange believes that the 

proposed rule change is consistent with 

the requirements of the Act and the 

rules and regulations thereunder that 

are applicable to a national securities 

exchange, and, in particular, with the 

requirements of Section 6 of the Act.7

Specifically, the Exchange believes that 

the proposed rule change is consistent 

with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,8 in that 

it provides for the equitable allocation 

of reasonable dues, fees and other 

charges among members and other 

persons using any facility or system 

which the Exchange operates or 

controls. The Exchange notes that it 

operates in a highly competitive market 

in which market participants can 

readily direct order flow to competing 

venues or providers of routing services 

if they deem fee levels to be excessive. 

The Exchange believes that the 

proposed changes are reasonable and 

equitable because they are nonsubstantive and the Exchange is not 

changing any fees or rebates that apply 

to trading activity on BATS Options or 

routed executions. Further, the changes 

are designed to make the fee schedule 

easier to read and for Members to 

validate the bills that they receive from 

the Exchange. The Exchange also 

believes that the proposal is nondiscriminatory because it applies 

uniformly to all Members, and again, 

the Exchange is not making any changes 

to existing fees and rebates. Finally, the 

Exchange believes that the proposed fee 

schedule will be clearer and less 

confusing for investors and will 

eliminate potential investor confusion, 

thereby removing impediments to and 

perfecting the mechanism of a free and 

open market and a national market 

system, and, in general, protecting 

investors and the public interest. 

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

The Exchange does not believe that 

the proposed rule change will result in 

any burden on competition that is not 

necessary or appropriate in furtherance 

of the purposes of the Act, as amended. 

To the contrary, the Exchange believes 

that the changes will both make the fee 

schedule easier to read and 

simultaneously provide Members with 

an easier way to validate their bills on 

a monthly basis, both of which the 

Exchange believes are important 

components of customer service and 

which will allow the Exchange to better 

compete for order flow. The Exchange 

reiterates that the changes are only to 

the format of the fee schedule and are 

entirely non-substantive. As stated 

above, the Exchange notes that it 

operates in a highly competitive market 

in which market participants can 

readily direct order flow to competing 

venues if the deem fee structures to be 

unreasonable or excessive. 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants or Others 

The Exchange has not solicited, and 

does not intend to solicit, comments on 

this proposed rule change. The 

Exchange has not received any written 

comments from members or other 

interested parties. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

The foregoing rule change has become 

effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) 

of the Act 9 and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 

19b–4 thereunder.10 At any time within 

60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 

change, the Commission summarily may 

temporarily suspend such rule change if 

it appears to the Commission that such 

action is necessary or appropriate in the 

public interest, for the protection of 

investors, or otherwise in furtherance of 

the purposes of the Act. If the 

Commission takes such action, the 

Commission shall institute proceedings 

to determine whether the proposed rule 

should be approved or disapproved. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– 

BATS–2014–066 on the subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities 

and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street 

NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–BATS–2014–066. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if email is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for Web site viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 

Washington, DC 20549, on official 

business days between the hours of 

10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such 

filing also will be available for 

inspection and copying at the principal 

office of the Exchange. All comments 

received will be posted without change; 

the Commission does not edit personal 

identifying information from 

submissions. You should submit only 

information that you wish to make 

available publicly. All submissions 

should refer to File Number SR–BATS– 

2014–066 and should be submitted on 

or before January 12, 2015. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2014 / Notices 76435 

11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.11

Kevin M. O’Neill, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29814 Filed 12–19–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 

[Docket No: SSA–2014–0079] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Comment Request 

The Social Security Administration 

(SSA) publishes a list of information 

collection packages requiring clearance 

by the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) in compliance with 

Public Law 104–13, the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, effective October 

1, 1995. This notice includes a revision 

of an OMB-approved information 

collection. 

SSA is soliciting comments on the 

accuracy of the agency’s burden 

estimate; the need for the information; 

its practical utility; ways to enhance its 

quality, utility, and clarity; and ways to 

minimize burden on respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. Mail, email, or 

fax your comments and 

recommendations on the information 

collection(s) to the OMB Desk Officer 

and SSA Reports Clearance Officer at 

the following addresses or fax numbers. 

(OMB) Office of Management and 

Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for SSA, Fax: 

202–395–6974, Email address: OIRA_

Submission@omb.eop.gov. 

(SSA) Social Security Administration, 

OLCA, Attn: Reports Clearance Director, 

3100 West High Rise, 6401 Security 

Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21235, Fax: 410– 

966–2830, Email address: 

OR.Reports.Clearance@ssa.gov. 

Or you may submit your comments 

online through www.regulations.gov, 

referencing Docket ID Number [SSA– 

2014–0079]. 

SSA submitted the information 

collection below to OMB for clearance. 

Your comments regarding the 

information collection would be most 

useful if OMB and SSA receive them 30 

days from the date of this publication. 

To be sure we consider your comments, 

we must receive them no later than 

January 21, 2015. Individuals can obtain 

copies of the OMB clearance package by 

writing to OR.Reports.Clearance@

ssa.gov. 

Statement of Funds You Provided to 

Another and Statement of Funds You 

Received—20 CFR 416.1103(f)—0960– 

0481. SSA uses Forms SSA–2854 

(Statement of Funds You Provided to 

Another) and SSA–2855 (Statement of 

Funds You Received) to gather 

information to verify if a loan is bona 

fide for Supplemental Security Income 

(SSI) recipients. Form SSA–2854 asks 

the lender for details on the transaction, 

and Form SSA–2855 asks the borrower 

the same basic questions independently. 

Agency personnel then compare the two 

statements, gather evidence if needed, 

and make a decision on the validity of 

the bona fide status of the loan. 

For SSI purposes, we consider a loan 

bona fide if it meets these requirements: 

• Must be between a borrower and 

lender with the understanding that the 

borrower has an obligation to repay the 

money; 

• Must be in effect at the time the 

cash goes to the borrower, that is, the 

agreement cannot come after the cash is 

paid; and 

• Must be enforceable under State 

law, often there are additional 

requirements from the State. 

SSA collects this information at the 

time of initial application for SSI or at 

any point when an individual alleges 

being party to an informal loan while 

receiving SSI. SSA collects information 

on the informal loan through both 

interviews and mailed forms. The 

agency’s field personnel conduct the 

interviews and mail the form(s) for 

completion, as needed. The respondents 

are SSI recipients and applicants, and 

individuals who lend money to them. 

Type of Request: Revision of an OMBapproved information collection. 

Modality of collection Number of 

respondents 

Frequency of 

response 

Average 

burden per 

response 

(minutes) 

Estimated 

total annual 

burden 

(hours) 

SSA–2854 ........................................................................................................ 20,000 1 10 3,333 

SSA–2855 ........................................................................................................ 20,000 1 10 3,333 

Totals ........................................................................................................ 40,000 ........................ ........................ 6,666 

Dated: December 17, 2014. 

Faye Lipsky, 

Reports Clearance Director, Social Security 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29821 Filed 12–19–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4191–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Requests for Comments; 

Clearance of Renewed Approval of 

Information Collection: Flightcrew 

Member Duty and Rest Requirements 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA 

invites public comments about our 

intention to request the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

approval to renew an information 

collection. Reporting and recordkeeping 

are required any time a certificated air 

carrier has exceeded a maximum daily 

flight time limit or a maximum daily 

Flight Duty Period (FDP) limit. It is also 

required for the voluntary development 

of a Fatigue Risk Management System 

(FRMS), and for fatigue training. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

submitted by February 20, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA 

at the following address: Ms. Kathy 

DePaepe, Room 126B, Federal Aviation 

Administration, ASP–110, 6500 S. 

MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 

73169. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES