alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EARNEST E. WARHURST, JR., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 14-00245-N

)

ONE TWENTY FOOT BERTRAN, 1969 ) IN ADMIRALTY

Model Year, bearing Alabama )

Registration No. AL8238LM, her )

engines, tackle, equipment, )

appurtenances, and attached travel )

trailer, etc., in rem, and DAVID L. )

JONES, in personam, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

This action came before the undersigned on November 7, 2014 in response to 

the parties’ request for a hearing on defendant’s assertions that a conflict of interest 

exists, which necessitates a release of the vessel, or in the alternative, the 

appointment of a new substitute custodian. Present at the hearing were Gregory 

Buffalow, Esq., counsel for the Plaintiff, and Daniel Sayers, Esq., counsel for the 

Defendant. Pending before the Court are Defendant David L. Jones’ Motions to 

Supplement (Docs. 54, 57), Plaintiff’s Reply (Doc. 55), and the parties’ Responses to 

the undersigned’s Order to Show Cause (Docs. 58, 59).

Defendant Jones’ first Motion to Supplement (Doc. 54) is construed by the 

Court as a Motion for Release of the Vessel or, in the alternative, to Appoint a New 

Case 1:14-cv-00245-N Document 61 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 2
2

Substitute Custodian. The motion is GRANTED only to the extent the motion 

requests a hearing before the Court, and is otherwise DENIED. 

The expert testimony and report of Joel Perez which was submitted by the 

Plaintiff in support of his claim has been previously stricken and such testimony 

will not be allowed at the trial of this action. Doc. 39 at 1. Although there is 

evidence of a relationship between plaintiff and the employees of the substitute 

custodian, no real showing has been made that the substitute custodian has 

violated its fiduciary obligation of safekeeping of the vessel. See New River 

Yachting Center, Inc. v. M/V Little Eagle II, 401 F. Supp. 132 (S.D. Fla. 1975) (the 

duty of substitute custodian is to maintain vessel “in a safe and secure manner as to 

protect it from injury to end that . . . its value to the parties will not have been 

impaired by unnecessary deterioration or damage from which the custodian could 

be responsible.”). Accordingly, to the extent the motion seeks release of the vessel, 

or in the alternative the appointment of a new custodian, the motion is DENIED.

Defendant Jones’ second Motion to Supplement (Doc. 57), which contains 

further information concerning the substitute custodian and requests specific orders 

to show cause directed at the Plaintiff, is DENIED for the reasons previously set 

out herein.

DONE and ORDERED this the 7th day of November 2014.

/s/ Katherine P. Nelson

KATHERINE P. NELSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00245-N Document 61 Filed 11/10/14 Page 2 of 2
Scope

Mass Echelon III Volume Transfer, II

30 kg to 1 mg 1500 gal to 5 gal

1000 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Volume Transfer, LPG

100 gal to 25 gal

Weight Carts

5000 lb to 2000 lb

United States Department of Commerce 

National Institute of Standards and Technology 

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

South Dakota 

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international 

system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented

measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, and

has demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

2022 to 2023 

_____________________________________

Katrice Lippa, Chief

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

Effective Dates: 2022-02-01 to 2024-02-01

Amended 6/29/2022: Extended range of

Volume Transfer, II and LPG

Amended 3/25/2022: Added Volume

Transfer, II and LPG to scope (Rev.: September 2021)
#### Daniel L. LINDSEY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-2513.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued May 9, 2001.

Decided June 6, 2001.

Kenneth Everett McPherson, Riverdale, MD, for appellant. Craig David Roswell, Niles, Barton & Wilmer, Baltimore, MD, for appellee. ON BRIEF: Ranji M. Garrett, Niles, Barton *&*Wilmer, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

Before LUTTIG, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In this diversity breach of contract action, Reverend Daniel L. Lindsey, Sr. sued the State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, alleging improper denial of his insurance claim for fire damage to his church. The district court granted State Farm’s motion for summary judgment due to Lindsey’s failure to substantially comply with the terms of the policy. We affirm.

I.

Daniel Lindsey is the pastor of Victory Temple Church of God in Christ (“Victory Temple”), for which he purchased fire insurance from State Farm. On November 2, 1997, a fire destroyed the church building and the personal property inside. Subsequently, Lindsey made a claim for the damages. After investigation, both State Farm and the Maryland State Fire Marshall concluded that the fire had been set intentionally.*

Lindsey’s insurance policy requires him to submit to an Examination Under Oath (“EUO”) “at such times as may be reasonably required about any matter relating to this insurance or [his] claim.” Lindsey first submitted to examination in March *2321998, but this initial EUO was suspended for family reasons, and the parties rescheduled for April 1998. State Farm suspended the second EUO when Lindsey refused to answer questions regarding how he spent money raised after the fire. Specifically, Lindsey refused to name the architect to whom he claimed to have paid some of this money and further stated that “I would like to stop the interview and I think I need an attorney.”

Four months later, Lindsey, through his attorney, sent a letter to State Farm stating that neither he nor his wife, Robin Lindsey, a trustee and officer of Victory Temple, would submit to further examination. After a year and a half of attempting to convince Reverend Lindsey to complete the examination, State Farm finally denied his claim.

II.

The district court granted summary judgment, finding that Lindsey did not substantially comply with the insurance policy, because he failed to complete the reasonably requested EUO. We have carefully considered the parties’ briefs, oral arguments, the record in the case, and the relevant legal authorities, and conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment to State Farm. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Lindsey v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.,*Civil Action No. AW-00-132 (D.Md. Oct. 23, 2000).

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 The Victory Temple fire was one of three suspected arsons in the immediate neighborhood. Lindsey was accused of setting one of the other two fires, but a jury acquitted him of all charges.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1917 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Library of Congress, 

Government Publishing Office, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Library of Congress, Government Publishing Office, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, GOVERNMENT PUB5 LISHING OFFICE, SALARIES AND EXPENSES 

6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Library of Congress, Government Publishing OfVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:55 Apr 14, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1917.IH H1917

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1917 IH

1 fice, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may not 

2 exceed $32,000,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 20191 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Jesus Guerrero**

**- Ortiz,** 

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20

- CR

- 573

- 1

Before **Southwick ,**  **Higginson,** and **Willett,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Guerrero

Ortiz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Guerrero

- Ortiz has not filed a response. We have

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determi ned that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 12, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-20191 Document: 00516505605 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/12/2022No. 21

- 20191

2 reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir.**
**R.** 42.2

. Case: 21-20191 Document: 00516505605 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/12/2022
Exhibit 10.3


 


 


May 20, 2015


 


		RE:	Closing Statement in connection with the Note Purchase Agreement between Omagine Inc. (“Company”) and YA
Global Master SPV, Ltd. (“Investor”). 



 


This letter shall constitute the Closing Statement
agreed upon between the Company and the Investor regarding various payments and transfers to be made by the parties in connection
with Note Purchase Agreement dated May 20, 2015 (“Subscription Agreement”).


 


The parties hereby agree that the Investor
shall make the payments and transfers set forth below in accordance with the wire instructions to the account of each recipient
as set forth on Schedule A attached hereto (or otherwise provided to the Investor):


 


 





	Gross Proceeds to be paid to the Company:	 	$	500,000.00	 
	Less:	 	 	 	 
	Commitment Fee to be paid to the YA Global II SPV LLC (as designee of the Investor):	 	$	(50,000.00	)
	 	 	 	 	 
	Net Proceeds to the Company	 	$	450,000.00	 
	 	 	 	 	 








 


 


[SIGNATURE PAGE IMMEDIATELY TO FOLLOW]


 






    	1



    	 



    




 


Omagine Inc. 


 


 


By: /s/ Charles P. Kuczynski





 






	Name:  Charles P. Kuczynski
	Title:  Vice President and Secretary


 


 


 


YA Global Master SPV, Ltd.


By: Yorkville Advisors Global, LP


Its: Investment Manager


 


By: Yorkville Advisors Global, LLC


Its: General Partner


 


 


By: /s/ Gerald Eicke





 






	Name:  Gerald Eicke
	Title:  Managing Member


 


 


 


 



    	2



    	 



    




 


 


SCHEDULE A


ACCOUNT INSTRUCTIONS


 


 


 


	Omagine Inc.  	 
	
        Omagine, Inc.

        Account Number  610-98230-3

         

        HSBC Bank

        ABA # 021001088

        Swift ID: MRMDUS33

         

        Fifth Avenue Branch

        452 Fifth Avenue

        New York, N.Y. 10118

         

        Bank Contact: Kevin O’Dea

        Telephone: 212-525-4094

         
	 
	 	 


 


YA Global II SPV LLC:


 


Instructions on file.


 




 


 


 


3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ELBERT SMITH, JR., and )

THERESA SMITH )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil Case No.: 05-331-BH-B

)

SCALES EXPRESS, INC., et al )

)

Defendant. )

SCALES EXPRESS, INC. and )

LINCOLN GENERAL INSURANCE )

COMPANY )

)

Plaintiffs )

)

v. ) Civil Case No.: 05-719-BH-B

)

ELBERT SMITH, JR., et al )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court regarding the above styled cases. In case number 05-719,

Scales Express, Inc. (hereinafter, “Scales”) has, along with its insurer, Lincoln General Insurance

Company (hereinafter, “Lincoln General”) filed a Complaint in Interpleader. Pursuant to their

Complaint in Interpleader, Scales and Lincoln General have filed a Motion (Doc. 34) to Stay

proceedings in case number 05-331 in which they are defendants. In response to Scales and

Lincoln’s Motion to Stay, Elbert and Theresa Smith (hereinafter, “the Smiths”), plaintiffs in action

05-331, have raised issues the Court feels need to be resolved. 

Based on the Smiths’ pleadings (Doc. 42), it does not seem that Scales, as the alleged

Case 1:05-cv-00719-BH-B Document 23 Filed 01/10/06 Page 1 of 2
tortfeasor in the automobile accident underlying both cases, is entitled to be joined as a Plaintiff in

the Complaint for Interpleader. Therefore, Scales and Lincoln are hereby ORDERED to SHOW

CAUSE on or before January 26, 2006 as to why the Court should not either dismiss their

Complaint for Interpleader (case number 05-719) or require that it be amended so that only Lincoln

is a named Plaintiff. Furthermore, the Smiths contend that because Scales should not be included

as a plaintiff in the interpleader action, Scales and Lincoln’s Motion to Stay proceedings in case

number 05-331 should be denied. Scales and Lincoln are hereby ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE

on or before January 26, 2006 as to why their Motion (Doc. 34) to Stay should not be denied. 

So ORDERED, this 10th day of January, 2006.

s/ W. B. Hand

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00719-BH-B Document 23 Filed 01/10/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.7



|     |                        |                   |                  |                 
|---- | ---------------------- | ----------------- | ---------------- | ----------------
|LOGO |                        | Two American Lane |                  | Tel 203.861.1031
|     | P.O. Box 5150          |                   | Fax 203.552.1501
|     | Greenwich, Connecticut |                   |                 
|     | 06831-8150             |                   |                 
|     | Joseph J. Allessie     |                   |                 
|     | Senior Vice President  |                   |                 
|     | General Counsel        |                   |                 



September 14, 2004



Campbell & Co., Inc.

Attn: General Counsel/Secretary

210 West Pennsylvania Avenue

Baltimore, MD 21204



|Re: | Advisory Agreements for World Monitor Trust II Series F
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------



Please be advised that it is anticipated that as of October 1, 2004, all the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Prudential Securities Futures Management
Inc. (the Prudential Managing Owners) of the above stated Trust is owned by Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. f/k/a Kenmar Advisory Corp. (the Kenmar Managing Owner). Therefore, with respect to the various advisory
agreements currently in effect by and between the Trust, the Prudential Managing Owner and you, please be notified that the Kenmar Managing Owner has assumed the liabilities and obligations of the Prudential Managing Owner thereunder and will
continue to satisfy and perform all liabilities and obligations thereunder.



The Kenmar Managing Owner will continue to operate per the existing advisory agreements. If this is acceptable, please sign both copies of this Letter Agreement and return one copy.



|                                     |  |                                       
|------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|PREFERRED INVESTMENT SOLUTIONS CORP.
|                                     | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Joseph J. Allessie                
|Name:                                |  | Joseph J. Allessie                    
|Title:                               |  | Senior Vice President, General Counsel
|                                    
|ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:             
|                                    
|CAMPBELL & CO., INC.                
|                                     | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Craig A. Weynand                  
|Name:                                |  | Craig A. Weynand                      
|Title:                               |  | General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          20,748
<SECURITIES>                                 1,179,874
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,299
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,266,399
<PP&E>                                          72,131
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,309,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,032
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        94,483
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,179,053
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,309,836
<SALES>                                         32,588
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,944
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                90,387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (26,443)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (26,443)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (26,443)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
First Day Second Day Third Day Fourth Day

Monday, April 19 Tuesday, April 20 Wednesday, April 21 Thursday, April 22

8:00 Welcoming remarks Announcements Announcements Announcements

10:30 Coffee Break Coffee Break Coffee Break Coffee Break

15:30 Coffee Break Coffee Break Coffee Break

19:00

20:00

20:15

21:15

Simulations of atomic and 

plasmonic systems--Maxim 

Sukharev (confirmed)

16:00

Lab Tours

Advanced Materials: Joerg Lahann (confirmed)

17:00

Reception

Advanced Materials, Optical properties GaN 

Nanowires, Kris Bertness(confirmed)

Plasmonics and Nano-optics: Marko Loncar 

(confirmed)

Plasmonics and circuit analysis: 

Nader Engheta (confirmed)

Plasmonics--Negative radiation pressure in 

metamaterials: Henri Lezec (confirmed)

Workshop on Nano-optics Plasmonics and Advanced Materials

Nano-optics: A: Susumu Noda 

(confirmed)

Plasmonics: George Schatz 

(confirmed)

Lunch/Contributed Seminars

12:00

Fluidics at the chip scale--Kris Helmerson 

(confirmed)

Metamaterials--A: Martin Wegener (confirmed)

Lunch/Contributed Seminars

Plasmonics for Sensing: Pierre Berini (confirmed)

Plasmonics structures for solar absorbers: 

Shanhui Fan (confirmed)

Lunch/Contributed Seminars

Metamaterials: Vladimir Shalaev 

(confirmed)

Lunch/Contributed Seminars

Nano-optics/plasmonics: Light transmission 

through subwavelength apertures, John Weiner 

(confirmed)

Advanced Materials--Bio and polymers: Karen 

Gleason (confirmed) 

V. Veselago, negative index materials and 

momentum (confirmed)

Semiconductor Plasmonic 

Nanolasers:Cun-Zheng Ning 

(confirmed)

Plasmonics--Light momentum in 

metamaterials: Masud Mansuripur (confirmed)

Nano-optics--Integrated devices: A: 

Sergei Bozhevolnyi (confirmed)

 Nano-optics--Frederico Capasso 

(confirmed)

Advanced Materials--Bio and 

polymers: Paula Hammond 

(confirmed)

8:30

13:30

Advanced Materials--spintronics 

and q-dots: Stuart Parkin 

(confirmed)

14:30

9:30

11:00

Overview Lecture: Lukas 

Novotny (confirmed)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1541 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1541

  To amend the Small Business Act to include requirements relating to 
   apprenticeship program assistance for small business development 
                    centers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2023

  Mr. Crow (for himself, Mr. Molinaro, Mr. Thanedar, and Ms. Salazar) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Small Business Act to include requirements relating to 
   apprenticeship program assistance for small business development 
                    centers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Workforce Pipeline 
Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAM 
              ASSISTANCE.

    Section 21(c)(3) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648(c)(1)) is 
amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (T), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in clause (v) of the first subparagraph (U) (relating 
        to succession planning), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting a semicolon;
            (3) in second subparagraph (U) (relating to training on 
        domestic and international intellectual property protections)--
                    (A) in clause (ii)(II), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (B) by redesignating such subparagraph as 
                subparagraph (V); and
            (4) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(W) providing information and assistance to small 
                business concerns, including by disseminating relevant 
                information from the Department of Labor and other 
                Federal agencies, on how to establish and improve--
                            ``(i) work-based learning opportunities (as 
                        defined in section 3 of the Carl D. Perkins 
                        Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 
                        U.S.C. 2302));
                            ``(ii) apprenticeship programs registered 
                        under the Act of August 16, 1937 (50 Stat. 664, 
                        chapter 663; commonly known as the `National 
                        Apprenticeship Act'; 29 U.S.C. 50 et seq.);
                            ``(iii) pre-apprenticeship programs; and
                            ``(iv) job training programs.''.
                                 <all>
```