Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 23, 2014 / Notices 76965 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 79 FR 51958 

(September 2, 2014). 

2The individual members are ACCO Brands USA 

LLC; Norcom, Inc.; and Top Flight, Inc. 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 

64565 (October 30, 2014) (Initiation). 4See id. 

IX. Analysis of Comments 

Comment 1: Scope Comments and Scope 

Clarification 

Comment 2: Whether the Department Should 

Investigate the Effects of the GOC’s 

Alleged Cyberhacking on this 

Investigation 

Comment 3: Whether Input Providers are 

‘‘Authorities’’ Within the Meaning of the 

Act 

Comment 4: Whether the Provision of 

Chinese Polysilicon for LTAR is 

Countervailable 

Comment 5: Whether the Department Should 

Attribute Subsidies Under the Provision 

of Polysilicon for LTAR Program to Wuxi 

Suntech’s Cross-owned Companies 

Comment 6: Whether the Provision of 

Aluminum Extrusions for LTAR is 

Countervailable 

Comment 7: Whether the Provision of Solar 

Glass for LTAR is Countervailable 

Comment 8: Whether AFA is Applicable to 

Trina Solar’s Land Purchases 

Comment 9: Whether All Banks in China 

Offering Preferential Loans to 

Respondents Constitute ‘‘Authorities’’ 

Comment 10: Whether the Department 

Should Adjust Its Benefit Calculations 

for Loans Received by Wuxi Suntech and 

Zhenjiang Ren De 

Comment 11: Whether the High or New 

Technology Tax Program is Specific 

Comment 12: Whether the Tax Offsets for 

R&D under the Enterprise Income Tax 

Law Program is Specific 

Comment 13: Whether the Department 

Should Adjust Its Benefit Calculation for 

Wuxi Suntech’s Use of the ‘‘Preferential 

Income Tax Program for High or New 

Technology Enterprises’’ and for the 

‘‘Tax Offsets for R&D under the 

Enterprise Income Tax Law’’ Programs 

Comment 14: Whether the Golden Sun 

Program is Countervailable 

Comment 15: Whether the Department 

Should Countervail the ‘‘Discovered 

Subsidies’’ or Subsidies Discovered 

During the Course of Verification 

Comment 16: Whether the Department 

Should Apply AFA to the Ex-Im Bank 

Buyer’s Credit Program 

Comment 17: Whether the Department 

Should Find Trina Solar and Wuxi 

Suntech to be Uncreditworthy 

Comment 18: Whether the Department 

Should Adjust the Sales Denominators 

Used in Calculating Subsidy Benefits for 

Wuxi Suntech 

Comment 19: Whether the Department 

Should Accept the Minor Corrections 

Presented by Wuxi Suntech at 

Verification 

X. Recommendation Attachment 

[FR Doc. 2014–30071 Filed 12–22–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–901] 

Certain Lined Paper Products From the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 23, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephanie Moore or Cindy Robinson 

AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3692 or (202) 482–3797, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 2, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published a notice of 

opportunity to request an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain lined paper products from the 

People’s Republic of China.1 Pursuant to 

a request from the Association of 

American School Paper Suppliers and 

its individual members (petitioners),2

the Department published in the 

Federal Register the notice of initiation 

of this antidumping duty administrative 

review with respect to Shanghai Lian Li 

Paper Products Co., Ltd. (Shanghai Lian 

Li) for the period September 1, 2013, 

through August 31, 2014. 

On October 30, 2014, the Department 

published the Notice of Initiation.3 On 

November 24, 2014, Petitioners timely 

withdrew their request for 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order with respect to 

Shanghai Lian Li. 

Rescission of the 2013–2014 

Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review, in whole or in part, if the parties 

that requested a review withdraw the 

request within 90 days of the date of 

publication of the notice of initiation of 

the requested review. The instant 

review was initiated on October 30, 

2014.4 Petitioners withdrew their 

request for a review on November 24, 

2014, which is within the 90-day 

deadline. No other party requested an 

administrative review of this segment of 

the proceeding. Therefore, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

we are rescinding this review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain lined 

paper products from the People’s 

Republic of China. 

Assessment 

Antidumping duties shall be assessed 

at rates equal to the cash deposit of 

estimated antidumping duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, during the 

period September 1, 2013, through 

August 31, 2014. 

The Department intends to issue 

appropriate assessment instructions 

directly to CBP 15 days after publication 

of this notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

importers of their responsibility under 

19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent increase in 

the amount of antidumping duties 

reimbursed. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APOs) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under an APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

76966 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 23, 2014 / Notices 

1See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 

Products From Taiwan: Affirmative Preliminary 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Dated: December 15, 2014. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29783 Filed 12–22–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

University of California Los Angeles, et 

al.; Notice of Consolidated Decision on 

Applications for Duty-Free Entry of 

Scientific Instruments 

This is a decision pursuant to Section 

6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and 

Cultural Materials Importation Act of 

1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, as amended by 

Pub. L. 106–36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR 

part 301). Related records can be viewed 

between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in 

Room 3720, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC. 

Comments: None received. Decision: 

Approved. We know of no instruments 

of equivalent scientific value to the 

foreign instruments described below, for 

such purposes as each is intended to be 

used, that was being manufactured in 

the United States at the time of its order. 

Docket Number: 14–012. Applicant: 

University of California Los Angeles, 

Los Angeles, CA 90095. Instrument: 

iCorr (Correlative Microscopy). 

Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech 

Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 79 

FR 64367, October 29, 2014. Comments: 

None received. Decision: Approved. We 

know of no instruments of equivalent 

scientific value to the foreign 

instruments described below, for such 

purposes as this is intended to be used, 

that was being manufactured in the 

United States at the time of order. 

Reasons: The instrument will be used to 

perform correlative microscopy of 

biological samples from micro to 

nanometer scales, using fluorescence 

light microscopy and cryo electron 

microscopy, used in conjunction to 

reveal dynamics and functionalities of 

the materials. 

Docket Number: 14–026. Applicant: 

Stanford University, Stanford, CA 

94305. Instrument: iMIC Digital 

Microscope 2.0 system full set (0000– 

530–25032). Manufacturer: FEI Munich 

(formerly TILL Photonics), Germany. 

Intended Use: See notice at 79 FR 

64367, October 29, 2014. Comments: 

None received. Decision: Approved. We 

know of no instruments of equivalent 

scientific value to the foreign 

instruments described below, for such 

purposes as this is intended to be used, 

that was being manufactured in the 

United States at the time of order. 

Reasons: The instrument will be used to 

perform high-speed imaging and 

simultaneous large volume data 

processing of cultured neurons from rats 

and mice growing in special made 

PDMS microfluidic chambers. A 

fluorescent microscopy system which is 

able to scan and acquire large amounts 

of images at high speeds is required, as 

well as the system being able to 

maintain stable focus plane over a long 

time-lapse recording. 

Docket Number: 14–027. Applicant: 

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 

Chevy Chase, MD 20815. Instrument: 

JEM–1400 Transmission Electron 

Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., 

Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 79 FR 

64367, October 29, 2014. Comments: 

None received. Decision: Approved. We 

know of no instruments of equivalent 

scientific value to the foreign 

instruments described below, for such 

purposes as this is intended to be used, 

that was being manufactured in the 

United States at the time of order. 

Reasons: The instrument will be used to 

research and discover the genetic 

pathways of various neurological 

diseases, using tissue samples from 

animal models which are examined for 

changes in their subcellular organelles 

that are believed to result from the 

effects of the diseases. 

Docket Number: 14–028. Applicant: 

University of Colorado Boulder, 

Boulder, CO 80309. Insrument: 

Fiberoptic Cable. Manufacturer: 

Ceramoptec Gmbh, Germany. Intended 

Use: See notice at 79 FR 64367, October 

29, 2014. Comments: None received. 

Decision: Approved. We know of no 

instruments of equivalent scientific 

value to the foreign instruments 

described below, for such purposes as 

this is intended to be used, that was 

being manufactured in the United States 

at the time of order. Reasons: The 

instrument will be used to pursue a 

research path towards constructing an 

off grid toilet that converts human waste 

into fertilizer or solid fuel, using solar 

energy transmitted by fiberoptic cable to 

a reaction chamber. A fiberoptic cable 

that is able to withstand high 

temperatures (300–700 degrees C) 

without a high transmission loss is 

required. 

Docket Number: 14–029. Applicant: 

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 

Chevy Chase, MD 20815. Instrument: 

KonTEM PhazR System. Manufacturer: 

KonTEM GmbH, Germany. Intended 

Use: See notice at 79 FR 64367, October 

29, 2014. Comments: None received. 

Decision: Approved. We know of no 

instruments of equivalent scientific 

value to the foreign instruments 

described below, for such purposes as 

this is intended to be used, that was 

being manufactured in the United States 

at the time of order. Reasons: The 

instrument will be attached to an 

electron microscope, in place of one of 

the apertures. It will be inserted into the 

electron beam path to enhance image 

contrast for the imaging of proteins such 

as ion channels. 

Dated: December 15, 2014. 

Gregory W. Campbell, 

Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–30069 Filed 12–22–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–853] 

Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 

Products From Taiwan: Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 23, 

2014. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the ‘‘Department’’) determines that 

imports of certain crystalline silicon 

photovoltaic products (‘‘certain solar 

products’’) from Taiwan are being, or 

are likely to be, sold in the United States 

at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’), as 

provided in section 735 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’). The 

final weighted-average dumping 

margins for this investigation are listed 

in the ‘‘Final Determination Margins’’ 

section below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Magd Zalok, Charles Riggle, or James 

Martinelli AD/CVD Operations, Office 

IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4162, (202) 482–0650, or (202) 482– 

2923, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department published the 

preliminary determination in the LTFV 

investigation of certain solar products 

from Taiwan on July 31, 2014.1 On 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES