alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (i)
Form S-8 No. 333-78221 pertaining to the LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. Retirement
Plan; (ii) Form S-8 No. 333-78187 pertaining to the LifePoint Hospitals, Inc.
1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and (iii) Form S-8 No. 333-78185 pertaining to
the LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. Management Stock Purchase Plan and LifePoint
Hospitals, Inc. Outside Director's Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan of our
reports dated (i) January 31, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of LifePoint Hospitals, Inc.; (ii) January 31, 2000, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of LifePoint Hospitals Holdings, Inc.; and
(iii) March 2, 2000, with respect to the financial statements of Dodge City
Healthcare Group, L.P. included in the LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Nashville, Tennessee
March 28, 2000
##### 



Doral Financial Corporation
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
 Quarter endedMarch 31, 2006Including Interest on DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax loss from continuing operations
    
    $
    (22,024
    )Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    175,587Total Earnings
    
    $
    153,563Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    174,276Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized
expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    547An estimate of the interest component within rental expense
    
    
    764Total Fixed Charges before preferred dividends
    
    
    175,587Preferred dividend factor
    
    
    8,325Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    183,912Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
    
    
    (A
    )Excluding Interest on DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax loss from continuing operations
    
    $
    (22,024
    )Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    142,879Total Earnings
    
    $
    120,855Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    141,568Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalizedexpenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    547An estimate of the interest component within rental expense
    
    
    764Total Fixed Charges before preferred dividends
    
    
    142,879Preferred dividend factor
    
    
    8,325Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    151,204Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
    
    
    (A
    )
#### CREO PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAINIPPON SCREEN MFG. CO., LTD., D.S. North America Holdings, Inc., and D.S. America, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-1077.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: May 14, 2001.

Before LOURIE, BRYSON, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*821
      *AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
11520.

#### Stanton *v.*Parham.

Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contains only the usual general grounds; the evidence for the defendant in error, while not in all respects satisfactory, authorized the verdict, and, the finding of the *474jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Decided July 14, 192Ó.

Foreclosure of lien; from Wilkes superior court — Judge Walker. April 12, 1920.

*Colley & Colley,*for plaintiff in error.

*C. E. Sutton,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
THEATTORNEY GENERAL. 

OFTEXAS 

Honorable Fred Holub Opinion No. C-636 

County Attorney 

Matagorda County Re: Whether the County Attorney 

Bay City, Texas of Matagorda County, Texas, 

has the duty to act under 

the new Uniform Reciprocal 

Dear Mr. Holub: Enforcement of Support Act. 

You have requested an opinion of this office concerning 

the capt loned matter. 

The new Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act, 

Acts 1965, 59th Legislature, Chapter 679, page 1561, codified 

as Article 2328b-4, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, delegates certain 

enumerated duties to the “ProseoutIng attorney” who 1s defined 

In Section 2 (0) a8 follows: 

‘Prosecuting attorney’ meana the 

distrl&‘attorney or, in those counties in 

which the county attorney fulfills the functions of the district attorney, the county 

attorney .” 

Section 21 of Article fj of the Texas Constitution 

provides, in part, as follows: 

“The County Attorneys shall represent 

the State in all cases in the District and 

inferior courts in their reapectlva counties: 

but if any county shall be included in a dlatrlct in which there shall be a Dletrlct 

Attorney, the respective duties of District 

Attorneys and County Attorney8 ahall in such 

counties be regulated by the Legislature.” 

The County Attorney of Matagorda County does not fulfill the functions of the District Attorney, aa suoh county 

has a District Attorney. 

In Section 2(o) of Article 2328b-4, aupra, the Leglslature haa, with clear and unambiguous language, defined the 

term “Prosecuting Attorney”, as used in the Act, Section 12 

-3086- 
Honorable Fred Holub, page 2 (C-636) 

thereof, when Texas is the initiating state, provides: 

"The prosecuting attorney, upon the request 

of the court or the State Department of Public 

Welfare, shall represent the plaintiff in any 

proceeding under this Act." 

Sections 18 and 19 of the Act contain comparable provisions 

when Texas is the responding state. 

As the Legislature has specifically made it the duty 

of the District Attorney to be the "Prosecuting Attorney" in 

such cases, in all instances, except In those counties in 

which the County Attorney fulfills the functions of the District Attorney, it is our opinion that the County Attorney 

of Matagorda County does not have the duty to act as "prosecuting attorney" under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of 

Support Act. See Garcia v. 

(Tex.Sup. 1955). 

Laughlin, 285 S.w.2d 191, 195 

SUMMARY 

The County Attorney of Matagorda County does 

not have the duty to act as "prosecuting attorney" under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement 

of Support Act. 

Very truly yours, 

WAGGONER CARR 

Attorney General of Texas 

By : ~-‘sz Ly‘I ‘\.‘~ 

'LARRY J.' CRADDOLiK 

Assistant Attorney General 

LJC:cm 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE: 

W; V. Geppert, Chairman 

Lonny F. Zwiener 

Robert Owen 

Ralph Rash 

Dean Arrlngton 

-3087- 
- i 

Honorable Fred Holub, page 3 (c-636) 

APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENBRAL 

BY: T. B. WRIGHT 

-3088-
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 75138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29531]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR15-4-000]


Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership; Notice of Filing of 
Supplement to Facilities Surcharge Settlement

    Take notice that on December 1, 2014, Enbridge Energy, Limited 
Partnership (Enbridge Energy), with the support of the Canadian 
Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), submitted a Supplement to 
the Facilities Surcharge Settlement approved by the Commission on June 
30, 2004, in Docket No. OR04-2-000, at 107 FERC ] 61,336 (2004).
    In accordance with Rule 602(f) of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.602(f), any person desiring to 
comment on this Supplement should file its comments with the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b2f4f7e0f1fddcdedbdcd7e1c7c2c2ddc0c6f2d4d7c0d19cd5ddc4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="35737067767a5b595c5b50664045455a474175535047561b525a43">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on December 29, 2014.

    Dated: December 10, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29531 Filed 12-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA *

 * CRIMINAL NO. 08-00327-CG 

v. *

 * 

JAMES A. ABERNATHY *

FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE

WHEREAS, on October 15, 2009, a guilty plea was entered by Defendant, JAMES A.

ABERNATHY, which guilty plea provided, inter alia, that the Defendant, JAMES A.

ABERNATHY, would enter a plea of guilty to Count 1 and Count 197 of the Superseding

Indictment, charging him with conspiracy to dispense and distribute anabolic steroids in

violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 846; and forfeiture in violation of Title 21,

United States Code, Section 853. The defendant agreed in the guilty plea to immediately forfeit

to the United States all of the defendant’s right, title, and interest to all property which is set

forth in Count 197 of the Superseding Indictment and which is forfeitable to the United States

pursuant to Title 21 United States Code, Section 853. Pursuant to that guilty plea the defendant

also agreed to execute any and all paperwork to facilitate and expedite the forfeiture of the

property and agreed and consented that the Order of Forfeiture in this case would become final

as to the defendant at any time after the guilty plea and before his sentencing in accordance with

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 32.2(b)(3). Pursuant to the guilty plea, Defendant, JAMES

A. ABERNATHY, agreed to and confessed to forfeit the following property:

(1) Drug proceeds in the amount of $5,000.00. (Five thousand dollars)

WHEREAS, the United States properly published notice of the forfeiture of the abovedescribed property and the requirements for filing a claim for the property for 30 consecutive

Case 1:08-cr-00327-CG-B Document 697 Filed 05/18/10 Page 1 of 2
2

days starting February 23, 2010, on www.forfeiture.gov, A Proof of Publication was filed on

March 25, 2010, (Doc. 670), specifying the details of this publication. No third-parties have

come forward to assert an interest in the subject property in the time required under Title 21,

United States Code, Section 853(n). 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED

that the following property is forfeited to the United States of America pursuant to Title 21,

United States Code, Sections 846 and 853, and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(b), for

disposition according to law:

(1) Drug proceeds in the amount of $5,000.00. (Five thousand dollars)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States shall retain jurisdiction in the case

for the purpose of enforcing this Order; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall forward two (2) certified

copies of this Order to Assistant United States Attorney George F. May.

DONE and ORDERED this 18th day of May, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:08-cr-00327-CG-B Document 697 Filed 05/18/10 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,552,033
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,026,618
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    110,463
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,224,759
<PP&E>                                      10,141,345
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,077,627
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,190,027
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,872,297
<BONDS>                                        684,332
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,371
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,488,358
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,190,027
<SALES>                                      3,502,108
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,902,108
<CGS>                                        3,124,150
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,506,749
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (773,120)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             485,430
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (316,951)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (316,951)
<DISCONTINUED>                               1,893,136
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,576,185
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Golden Telecom, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian Rich, Senior
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
11th day of March 2005. /s/ BRIAN RICH 
 Brian Rich
Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      369
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   870
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,057,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,057,483
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,906
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (111,001)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (111,001)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (111,001)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT WEST, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CA NO. 14-0218-CG-C

)

SAM COCHRAN, SHERIFF OF :

MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA,

)

)

)

Defendant. )

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, 

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 9) is

GRANTED. 

DONE and ORDERED this 9th day of March, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00218-CG-C Document 20 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.4


Exhibit 10.4


	
		
	DEXCOM, INC.
2015 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (“ESPP”)


	

ENROLLMENT/CHANGE FORM






	
			
	SECTION 1:
ACTIONS
	CHECK DESIRED ACTION:      AND COMPLETE SECTIONS:
   Enroll in the ESPP         2 + 3 + 4 + 6
   Change Contribution Percentage   2 + 4 + 6
   Discontinue Contributions      2 + 5 + 6

	SECTION 2:
PERSONAL DATA
	Name:                          
Home Address:                    


Social Security No.:        -      -  


	Department:
      

	SECTION 3:
ENROLL
	I hereby elect to participate in the ESPP, effective at the beginning of the next Offering Period.  I elect to purchase shares of the Common Stock of Dexcom, Inc. (the “Company”) pursuant to the ESPP. I understand that the stock certificate(s) for the shares purchased on my behalf will be issued in street name and deposited directly into my brokerage account.  I hereby agree to establish an account with a company designated brokerage for this purpose and to sign all required forms.
My participation will continue as long as I remain eligible, unless I withdraw from the ESPP by filing a new Enrollment/Change Form with the Company.  I understand that I must notify the Company of any disposition of shares purchased under the ESPP.

	SECTION 4:
ELECT CONTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE
	I hereby authorize the Company to withhold a percentage of my bi-weekly payroll that will total ___% of my compensation (as defined in the ESPP) for the Purchase Period. That amount will be applied to the purchase of shares of the Company’s Common Stock pursuant to the ESPP.  The percentage compensation to purchase common stock must be a whole number (from 1%, up to a maximum of 10%).
Note:    You may change your contribution percentage once within a six month Purchase Period.  Each change will become effective as soon as reasonably practicable after the form is received by the Company.

	SECTION 5:
DISCONTINUE CONTRIBUTIONS
	I hereby elect to stop my contributions under the ESPP, effective as soon as reasonably practicable after this form is received by the Company.  The contributions that I have made to date during this Offering Period should be applied as follows:
    Purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock at the end of the period.
   Refund all contributions to me in cash, without interest.  I understand that I cannot resume participation until the start of the next Offering Period.

	SECTION 6:
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND SIGNATURE
	I acknowledge that I have received a copy of the Prospectus summarizing the major features of the ESPP.  I have read the Prospectus and this form and hereby agree to be bound by the terms of the ESPP.
Signature:                    Date:
CONTACT 

Technology Partnerships Office (TPO)

National Institute of Standards and

Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 

TPO@NIST.GOV 

Benefits

Void-free metallic diffraction gratings 

for enhanced X-ray interferometry 

imaging

Patent 11,579,344

Description 

Problem: 

Improvement is needed in X-ray phase 

contrast imaging systems for better 

imaging outcomes for soft tissues 

without the need for radioactive contrast 

agents.

Invention:

A metallic diffraction grating with 

recessed features that are optimized for 

metallic void-free filling by electrodeposition. 

Commercial Applications:

- X-ray interferometry

- X-ray phase contrast imaging

- X-ray wave-front-sensing

- Optics characterization

- Optics alignment

- Focus characterization at X-ray

free-electron lasers (XFELs)

- Biomedicine

- Materials Science

- Security

Competitive Advantages:

- Minimal deposits on the field

- Reduction in post-deposition 

processing time.

- Void-free filled recessed feature with

- highly uniform filling profiles.

Also see patent 10,889,908 and 

patent application 17/972,816