alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1547 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1547

  To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a study on the 
costs and benefits of commuter rail passenger transportation involving 
                   transfers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2023

Mr. Kean of New Jersey (for himself and Mrs. Watson Coleman) introduced 
      the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a study on the 
costs and benefits of commuter rail passenger transportation involving 
                   transfers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``One Seat Ride Act''.

SEC. 2. STUDY ON COMMUTER SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Transportation, in consultation 
with the Administrators of the Federal Transit Administration and the 
Federal Railroad Administration, shall conduct a study analyzing the 
costs and benefits of providing commuter rail passenger transportation 
that does not involve a transfer compared with the costs and benefits 
of providing commuter rail passenger transportation involving a 
transfer.
    (b) Requirements.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), 
the Secretary shall--
            (1) consider economic, logistical, and quality of life 
        factors in analyzing the costs and benefits of the different 
        types of commuter rail passenger transportation identified in 
        such subsection; and
            (2) include in such study an analysis of such costs and 
        benefits with respect to commuter rail passenger transportation 
        on the New Jersey Transit Raritan Valley line during peak 
        hours.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 9 months after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report on the 
study conducted under subsection (a).
    (d) Definition.--In this section, the term ``commuter rail 
passenger transportation'' has the meaning given such term in section 
24102 of title 49, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         841501                         
<NAME>                        OWENS MORTGAGE INVESTMENT FUND
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                           13,359,853
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                     1,489,602
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 15,349,455  
<PP&E>                            6,781,411
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  182,349,222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               844,304
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                      181,504,918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    182,349,222
<SALES>                                   0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  5,658,603
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  1,589,694
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   4,068,909
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               4,068,909
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                      4,068,909
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     .022
<EPS-DILUTED>                     .022
        

</TABLE>
**MOTOR CLUB OF AMERICA**

             Exhibit (22) Subsidiariesof the Registrant.

             The following are thesubsidiaries of the Company as of March 23, 2001:

|          Name | State of  Organization |
|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|
|                                                  |                   |
| Motor  Club of America Insurance Company              | New  Jersey            |
|                                                  |                   |
| Preserver  Insurance Company                          | New  Jersey            |
|                                                  |                   |
| North  East Insurance Company                         | Maine                  |
|                                                  |                   |
| American  Colonial Insurance Company                  | New  York              |
|                                                  |                   |
| Mountain  Valley Indemnity Company                    | New  Hampshire         |
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant
to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Zeynep
Hakimoglu, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of ClearOne Communications, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of ClearOne Communications, Inc.











Date:  February
      13, 2009
            By:
            /s/ Zeynep HakimogluZeynep
      HakimogluChairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)

















A
signed original of the written statement above required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to ClearOne Communications, Inc.
and will be retained by ClearOne Communications, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
1 Parrish also contests the validity of the lien under Texas law. We assume for the purpose of

applying § 522 that an enforceable lien existed, but we express no opinion as to the merits of

Parrish's contention. United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

No. 93-8063

Summary Calendar.

In the Matter of Samuel Ray PARRISH, Debtor.

Sharman Rae McVAY, Appellant,

v.

Samuel Ray PARRISH, Appellee.

Nov. 15, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The parti es contest the avoidance in bankruptcy of an equitable lien imposed by a Texas

divorce decree. We agree with the courts below that the lien is avoidable as a judgment lien under

11 U.S.C. § 522(f).

Samuel Parrish and Sharman McVay married March 6, 1982. A year later Parrish inherited

a 23.15 acre tract from his mother. The parties divorced on March 21, 1991. The divorce decree

included a judgment in McVay's favor against Parrish for $76,500, representing half of t he

reimbursement to the community estate for improvements Parrish made to the land he inherited. This

judgment was secured by an equitable lien against that land. Parrish filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy

relief on May 29, 1991. The bankruptcy court allowed Parrish to avoid the lien under 11 U.S.C. §

522(f)(1), 144 B.R. 349 and the district court affirmed.

Section 522(f)(1) allows a debtor to avoid th e fixing o f a judicial lien on property made

exempt as a Texas homestead. 1 Its protection is limited in that a debtor cannot avoid a lien on an

int erest acquired after a lien attached. F arrey v. Sanderfoot,

--- U.S.

----, 111 S.Ct. 1825, 1 1 4L.Ed.2d 337 ( 1991). F arrey involved a divorce decree that simultaneously ended a marital

community and created a lien against one of the new separate property interests. The court reasoned

that when a debtor simultaneously acquired a fee simple interest and a lien on that interest, there was

no risk that the lien had been created by a creditor rushing to court in anticipation of bankruptcy. The

policy behind section 522(f)(1) was not advanced by applying it under those circumstances. Id.

---

U.S. at

---- - ----, 111 S.Ct. at 1830-31. See also In re Finch, 130 B.R. 753, 757 (S.D.Tex.1991)

(reaching the same result under Texas community property law).

This case is distinguishable from Farrey and Finch. Parrish acquired the property through

inheritance in 1983 as his separate property

. From that point on it was his separate property, as

Texas law fixes the character of property as of the time of inception of title. E ggemeyer v.

Eggemeyer, 554 S.W.2d 137, 140 (Te x.1977). Thus the decree di d not create a new property

interest for Parrish as did the decrees in Farrey and Finch. Since Parrish's interest existed before the

divorce and co nt inued unaltered afterwards, we find that the lien attaching to that property was

avoidable under section 522.

AFFIRMED.
1

Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 402

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

No. CR-22-3

STERLING D. WOOLFORD

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

 APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered October 5, 2022

APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FIFTH 

DIVISION

[NO. 60CR-20-1828]

HONORABLE WENDELL GRIFFEN, 

JUDGE

MOTION GRANTED; SHOWCAUSE ORDER ISSUED

PER CURIAM

Sterling Woolford moves this court to enforce a writ of certiorari to complete the 

record on appeal that we issued, eight months ago, to court reporter Neva Warford. Because 

Warford’s failure to comply with the writ is good cause to grant the motion, we do so. The 

time to file a complete record is hereby extended to 31 October 2022. For the reasons 

provided below, we also order Neva Warford to appear before this court on 1 November

2022, at 9:30 a.m., in the courtroom of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals 

(Justice Building, 625 Marshall Street, Little Rock, AR 72201), and show cause why she 

should not be held in contempt for failing to comply with the original writ of certiorari, or 

any one of the extensions.
2

On 3 January 2022, appellant Woolford simultaneously filed a partial record in this 

court and asked for a writ of certiorari directing court reporter Neva Warford to complete 

the transcript portion of the record in this criminal appeal. We granted the petition on 

January 26 and ordered the supplemental record be completed and filed within thirty days. 

After thirty days had passed, Warford had not completed her task, so Woolford moved us 

to enforce the writ. We granted that motion and allowed fifteen more days. No 

supplemental record was prepared. So Woolford was required to file a third, fourth, and 

fifth motion to complete the record. This court granted those motions; but in the fifth 

related order we set a final deadline of 15 September 2022.

Despite Woolford’s continued efforts, and this court’s prior orders, the record 

remains deficient because Warford has yet to comply with this court’s commands. A sixth

request for more time was therefore required. In it, Woolford asked this court to enforce 

our January 2022 writ—“by any means necessary”. For the reasons provided, good cause 

exists to grant a sixth extension and the show-cause order. See James Tree & Crane Serv., Inc. 

v. Fought, 2015 Ark. 6 (show-cause order issued to court reporter).

NEVA WARFORD IS FURTHER NOTIFIED that her failure to appear on 1 

November 2022, at 9:30 a.m., could result in the issuance of a bench warrant for her arrest, 

with directions to the appropriate law enforcement authority to arrange for her delivery to 

this court so a show-cause hearing can be conducted as soon as possible.

Motion granted; show-cause order issued. 

GRUBER, J., not participating
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 1,
2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods covered
by the Report.
 /s/ Paul J. van der Wansem

Paul J. van der Wansem
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
Directors (principal executive officer)
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73893-73894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29157]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Member Conflict: AIDS and AIDS Related Research.
    Date: December 17, 2014.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Robert Freund, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 5216,

[[Page 73894]]

MSC 7852, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-1050, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#21475344544f4553614252530f4f48490f464e57"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fc9a8e998992988ebc9f8f8ed2929594d29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 9, 2014.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-29157 Filed 12-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
 
                                                        EXHIBIT 12 

COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                     Six Months
                                                   Ended June 30,
                                                 ------------------
                                                   1998       1997      
                                                 -------    -------     
<S>                                              <C>        <C>         
Earnings:                                                               
    Earnings before income tax expense            20,144     17,133     
    Add:                                                                
    Interest on advances and other borrowings     45,538     36,533     
    Interest component of rental expense           1,076        467     
                                                 -------    -------     
    Earnings before fixed charges excluding       66,758     54,133     
      Interest on customer deposits                                     
    Interest on customer deposits                 78,597     38,139     
                                                 -------    -------     
    Earnings before fixed charges                145,355     92,272     
                                                 =======    =======     
                                                                        
                                                                        
Fixed Charges:                                                          
    Interest on advances and other borrowings     45,538     36,533     
    Interest component of rental expense           1,076        467     
                                                 -------    -------     
    Fixed charges excluding interest on                                 
      customer deposits                           46,614     37,000     
    Interest on customer deposits                 78,597     38,139     
                                                 -------    -------     
    Total fixed charges                          125,211     75,139     
                                                 =======    =======     
                                                                        
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges including                            
  interest on customer deposits                     1.16x      1.23x    
                                                                        
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges excluding                            
  interest on customer deposits                     1.43x      1.46x    
</TABLE>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Exhibit 12

                               MOBIL CORPORATION
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     (In millions, except for ratio amount)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                             Year Ended December 31,
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                      1992    1993    1994    1995     1996
                                    ------  ------   ------  ------   ------
Income Before Change in
  Accounting Principle(s) ........  $1,308  $2,084   $1,759  $2,376   $2,964
Add:
  Income taxes ...................   1,567   1,931    1,919   2,015    3,147
  Portion of rents representative
    of interest factor ...........     319     339      340     368      376
  Interest and amortization
    of debt discount expense .....     612     529(a)   461     467      455
  Earnings (greater) less
    than dividends from
    equity affiliates ............      36     265      (40)    (51)     153
                                    ------  ------   ------  ------   ------
Income as Adjusted ...............  $3,842  $5,148   $4,439  $5,175   $7,095
                                    ======  ======   ======  ======   ======

Fixed Charges:
  Interest and amortization
    of debt discount expense .....  $  612  $  529(a) $ 461     467   $  455
  Capitalized interest ...........      42      42       37      47       78
  Portion of rents representative
    of interest factor ...........     319     339      340     368      376
                                    ------  ------    -----  ------   ------
Total Fixed Charges ..............  $  973  $  910    $ 838  $  882   $  909
                                    ======  ======    =====  ======   ======

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges     3.9     5.7(a)   5.3     5.9      7.8
                                    ------  ------   ------  ------   ------



For the years ended December 31, 1992,  1993, 1994, 1995 and 1996, Fixed Charges
exclude $37  million,  $31 million,  $37  million,  $28 million and $24 million,
respectively,  of interest expense  attributable to debt issued by the Mobil Oil
Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan Trust and guaranteed by Mobil.

(a) Excludes the favorable effect of $205 million of interest  benefits from the
    resolution of prior-period tax issues.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Mobil                                   - 29 -
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT SANDERS, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. CA 05-0383-C

:

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security, :

Defendant.

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on this

date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the

decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff disability

insurance benefits be affirmed. 

DONE this the 26th day of January, 2006.

 s/WILLIAM E. CASSADY 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00383-C Document 16 Filed 01/27/06 Page 1 of 1