alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 240 (Monday, December 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 74116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29278]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Notice of Appointments of Individuals to Serve as Members of 
Performance Review Boards

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).
AGENCY: National Labor Relations Board.

ACTION: The National Labor Relations Board is issuing this notice that 
the individuals whose names and position titles appear below have been 
appointed to serve as members of performance review boards in the 
National Labor Relations Board for the rating year beginning October 1, 
2013 and ending September 30, 2014.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Name and Title

Kathleen A. Nixon--Deputy Chief Counsel to the Chairman
Gary W. Shinners--Executive Secretary
William B. Cowen--Solicitor
Robert Schiff--Chief of Staff for the Chairman
Anne G. Purcell--Associate General Counsel, Division of Operations 
Management
Linda Dreeben--Deputy Associate General Counsel, Division of 
Enforcement Litigation
Margery Lieber--Associate General Counsel, Division of Legal Counsel
Barry J. Kearney--Associate General Counsel, Division of Advice

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Shinners, Executive Secretary, 
National Labor Relations Board, 1099 14th Street NW., Washington, DC 
20570, (202) 273-3737 (this is not a toll-free number), 1-866-315-6572 
(TTY/TDD).

    By Direction of the Board,
William B. Cowen,
Solicitor.
[FR Doc. 2014-29278 Filed 12-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7545-01-P
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1555 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2300 Sylvan Avenue in Modesto, California, as the ‘‘Corporal Michael 

D. Anderson Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2023 

Mr. MCCLINTOCK (for himself, Mr. DUARTE, Mr. PANETTA, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. KILEY, Mr. PETERS, and Ms. BROWNLEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2300 Sylvan Avenue in Modesto, California, 

as the ‘‘Corporal Michael D. Anderson Jr. Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CORPORAL MICHAEL D. ANDERSON JR. POST 

4 OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 2300 Sylvan Avenue in Modesto, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1555 IH

1 California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Cor2 poral Michael D. Anderson Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Corporal Michael D. 

7 Anderson Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Great Lakes Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew W. Dorn, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.

November 8, 2006

| |                                       | 
| | ------------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Andrew W. Dorn, Jr.               | 
| | Andrew W. Dorn, Jr.                   | 
| | President and Chief Executive Officer | 
| | Principal Executive Officer           |
# E VANS



# , R OWE 

# & H OLBROOK

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Union Square, Suite 900

10101 Reunion Place

San Antonio, TX 78216

(210) 340

- 6555 Elsa Marie Garza, Legal Assistant

Fax (210) 340

- 6664 Telephone: (210) 340

- 6555

www.evansrowe.com egarza@evans

- rowe.com



### February 1 6 , 2015

Fourth Cou rt of Appeals

Cadena Reeves Justice Center

San Antonio, Texas 78205

- 3 037

RE: Cause No. 04

- 15

- 00029

- CV; In the Fourth Court of Appeals at San Antonio, Texas,

Diagnostic Research Group, and John R. Holcomb, M.D., Appellants v. Sushma Vora

Appellee

Dear Ladies & Gentlemen :

With regard to the above

- referenced matter, enc losed for filing please find the following:

1. 

### BRIEF OF APPELLANTS, DIAGN OSTICS RESEARCH GROUP,

L.L.C. AND JOHN R. HOLCOMB, M.D.

Please file among the papers of the Court, date stamp the copy, and return the copy to our

office via the e

- se rvice . By copy of this letter, counsel of record will be served as reflected below.

Tha nk you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions or need additional

information, please do not hesitate to call.

Respectfully yours,



## Elsa Marie Garza

Elsa Marie Garza, Legal Assistant to

Matthew M. Edwards

EMG

Enclo sures

c c: Christopher J. Deeves Via e

- service and fax

Beth Janicek Via e

- service and fax

Harvey Ferguson, Jr./Benjamin C. Nichols Via e

- service and fax

Joseph P. Thomas/Jeffrey D. Geoppinger Via e

- service and fax
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MARILYN W. WEAVER, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. CA 05-0656-BH-C

:

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security, :

Defendant.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to

the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to

which objection is made, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated June 6, 2006, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

DONE this 13th day of July, 2006.

s/ W. B. Hand

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00656-BH-C Document 16 Filed 07/13/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                           2,870
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,199
<ALLOWANCES>                                       538
<INVENTORY>                                      8,590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,938
<PP&E>                                           4,942
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,789
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,030
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,551
<SALES>                                         33,820
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,820
<CGS>                                           24,940
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,627
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,775
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    74
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  91
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,447
<INCOME-TAX>                                       610
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                837
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       837
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
        


</TABLE>
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROMCOURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

OFTOSMoxH»«&LSTMION,l^Wfi» m POSTAGE»

STATE OF TEXAS M *TM^**^

PENALTY FOR

PRIVATE USE /

PITNEY BOWES

a. u.*

ZIP 78701

02 W

0001401623 MAY. 08. 2015

5/6/2015 lJ, ' ' ' OCHOA, ADRIAN Tr. Ct.~No. W„13-25142-T (A)

This is to advise that the Court has denied without written order the application for

writ of habeas corpus on the findings oftrie trial courtwithout a hearing.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

WR-82,879-03

IE

ADRIAN OCHOA

GOREE UNIT - TDC # 1916532

7405 HWY 75 SOUTH

HyMTSVtttETTX^SS^ UTF

'''irHWtiJilil'L*
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40651

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

REYMUNDO PIEDRA-GARCIA, also known as Ramiro Piedro-Pompa, 

Defendant-Appellant.

Consolidated with

No. 06-40658

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

REYMUNDO PIEDRA-GARCIA, also known as Sabino Perez Gomez, 

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 1:05-CR-855

USDC No. 1:03-CR-368-1

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
No. 06-40651 c/w

No. 06-40658

-2-

Appealing the Judgments in Criminal Cases, Reymundo PiedraGarcia raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgments of the district court are AFFIRMED.
#### L. O. Schmidt & Co. *v.*Thomas P. Larder, et al.

Mortgage of Personalty in the Possession of a Bailee — Delivery of Possession.

A sale of personal property left in the possession of the seller or his bailee after sale, is fraudulent as to creditors; but where the bailee, at the instance of the seller, delivers the property to the purchaser, or agrees to hold the same for the vendee, it is an actual delivery and is not a sale fraudulent as against creditors.

APPEAL PROM MADISON CIRCUIT COURT.

March 13, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor;

The whiskey in controversy was in the actual possession of the bailee of Larder when the mortgage to the appellee was executed. It might be regarded that such a possession was not decisive as to creditors, and the case not within the doctrine of constructive fraud, the possession being with the bailee and not with the actual owner. It is not necessary to determine this question. The bailee of Larder had the actual possession. He was holding the whiskey for Larder; and on the day the mortgage was executed, the evidence shows that the actual possession was delivered to the appellee. The whiskey was in the cellar of McKee, the bailee. Larder,. the appellee, and others were in the cellar examining the whiskey or to see that it was there, when the bailee, by the consent of Larder, and at the instance of the appellee, agreed to take charge of the *434whiskey and hold it for the latter. McKee then became the bailee of the appellee, and his possession, that was actual, was the possession of the appellee.

*J. W. Caperton, for appellant. ■*

*W. B. Smith, for appellees:*

If the whiskey had been on the premises of Larder and in his possession, a mere declaration by the parties that the whiskey was appellees’ and in his possession would not suffice. In such a case there must'be an actual delivery, a taking away, for if left in the actual possession of the vendor after sale, it is fraudulent as to creditors. If, however, the whiskey or property is in the actual possession of a third party as bailee, and a sale is made, the bailee agreeing to hold for the vendee, it is an actual delivery and change of possession. The vendee may not desire to remove it. The property passes to him by the purchase, and the actual possession is not in the owner but in a third party. It cannot, then, be said that the possession is in the vendor. Judgment *affirmed.*
MUkMdLMlMl

\l.

ItatreFVtiihfJ/iLAppaiiA

MMTeW

TtitiTfireoFTtMS, hppllltt

nrTTOni U JkfidnroMij h\ii^

tttld.tJlp.f.kUia)

mttm UtMUumm.-x^'XU fsuSTpffippttiM hrtmm

k PreTxi)^ M br.^JH£TittiMj hMblTd ktoiUM uhmlku IdM)

~r.

tij/? ~xs at.mpun an oF P>n hunts To tueTitm tbttr't Tfrnsmm

to rtMifl) jAMism uF Uppuiate:

ApPflMlJT:

foihtojSmriMM IMmMmMK.

M#MM,)idfl#.UWt>

P.Utlltm ttn1iPtfiulWH)iio

APPeuk: ftWBLMTH HtiLhiHJteL

iMJimMrmi. fkMmijJMPAL&MmMl

Uhnun

RECBVED1N flmuvL^wiiiiii

6QtJFffQF-CBM>NAL APPEALS

DEC 15 2015

-AbefAeostarClerkP«fr£i
Htti tM£S MfoUAltf fafoil/AtlMUt PEftTihdMniE fMftT

i)P AmfHiTbk}kEhliix.t DtM£mMj//IPPEflu»lT«£ kmt\koF:

it\) kmuitir foMEtiM mr k< tM<mimr6M fa&ilfiTo Out

hum iiiiA DatiED

hPPCLUtiT ComtlOf Til AT TliMT/IT£ DFTMtTii THE 1lak$TVTa

of htlT<:i>i>! hutltri PitledTo /jumJiJmTo Fm.e fot AtcMell:jn:

hMTtTUTroriH iJMtlMEiJT li

it) UPPelMT tumpoU hunriM tut k) imtt -nxm mm km

(D.) AfPELMTfiUB CoiJTEhlDS TMTMHuMT/ihMllL EfrteM.F. ihrioirr

DrCEOT BkbEtitE CtMrFiTaTtt htttlriULE fopfrt Uszb adUm^

dc/Jtejtide AfpELUhiTh FMTixulflfiem \l.trm.Mini.Ul%

TiiAx\tiMPMhh^iminii\\bT^kFMMimiuM.tii.-.

f.g. hmTT ]/. fr/m, Ilk Ilil.M 0M CUif.tntf. Up. LM)

tomtptr html

kv, hhkatu \i. arm m,ibi.,u w.ntti.i

tram. ^m.i- turn m. a/o m)

ntiMr LmtiDt the tputrshMiD UhEtiJ-rtiETtcmcmm

\)tTelMri4t}Tad oF httlTU^ tUtUPnA PiFFeMP. tiFltSDUT

(ftfiPtHlUEIDHtf^lBW pBhlH-faOE 11.61.DuETi-flU FtlTTMT

.THE A9PMtttTF.ttl PwtetiThMiTt PtMf TUTU blii Pea/'ED

Pup ifopm knimi th tm hmriDMirnittFm MitzTuTtoiJ

kM IhsJsti TUB fcMTTo FUF Ffr$ AtMEM)

m%
htuutfT toriCLUMJ TtiHTTiJ ttJe tfltrref! HatutitrFqhtH

m PrffiiohicF'bxscdmoMM'kite/Jig nhn itnrBsrrmi

v. ImMMmmm nm j\M. \\-t>o,u it: tv the ii^judikjildTSTftfT Pi HUT hit llkmsttl CpMTi/TeM- IME hllM-MUM

t>j tupSts/th NuatoFAppeals tJUfUieJ/J-nnTTVE Cduatof

hpptiU fititxiLdIrRktiT fcs DeTxFtqiJdue to fmtoFDiiz Pums

\f6S Defied TttttT3l tFseiFts Mum To DeiJj/tHe APP~elMTA

FktP Tmi.teEJM, httiTrTuTrtiii lVkhEnlMEt4TRiMTj)fiL$6

Mv. htMFill EPUH kH -MUtMDxtTroMj)

htM

hpiHfTTtitT H( LITE htEPTtati tiFTliE titTll tlUHTDF UpPMlS' UltnOti^UF To l\ tMtti}F0Fht)tlPJ5i JEMftDEtED TfM DMDInjE.i

M\iu FHiuntm dPidm filmof$a twftFIti hihmotlU

UUPSFD Akit) kdfrPMtiTflEflMflEdTf} to1 FaM,WttUe Ujxfrd

U hmm kt) f\ tJEiJ-nttRL ktttiTEuM FonuUnit ktikMFi

Uv-tiF 71 m-tii APPiLLkdrMUl ENTITLED.

tmnrMutooM

1m(eP\I P,m^m

ICIWUMT

ID DO loDUctoMLtittmil

SMEpsftTM WWI6

PWE
[eptxFtchtf of fjf.d\ltct

Tfr# TiTdCfMiF/Shl DettMElHriMlsA Ifi/EAdDfoet&T

POpl/ Of TIF FMOXilf, feTxTTOAi MAppum 'hott* lis kiti

JWlDEfl Mlli nixi oti All hmiStL ofHecoPQAm TiTecested

P/H?T|f LtfFED kLBI/J :

MiUML

ItekMJswML

UMiMin

tt>(E\lEptllTUtJiSxMt\ 1II31-HI0

faun oFMimx^l Appeals

U.Uvuoi

MMJMmJIIIL

'iuMlK

X

/FppELUUJr'PPojE II

4
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
                     
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          3,014
<SECURITIES>                                    5,479
<RECEIVABLES>                                   7,822
<ALLOWANCES>                                      369
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               17,264
<PP&E>                                          7,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                  4,569
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 20,968
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           6,606
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                       271
<COMMON>                                          127
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,964
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   20,968
<SALES>                                         2,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                3,453
<CGS>                                             752
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,701
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,557)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,557)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,557)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.36)
        



</TABLE>
Instructions: Before watching the video, fill out the table below with what you know 

about the following International System of Units (SI) measurements. For example, what 

do the units measure? What tools use those measurement units?

Instructions: While watching the video, complete the exercises below. 

Episode 4

1) Write a “T” next to each statement that you think is true, and an “F” next to each statement

you think is false.

2) Explain which statement about the kilogram is false and why.

Name: Class/Date:

TWO TRUTHS 

& A LIE!

Kelvin (K) Kelvin measures temperature. A tool that uses Kelvin is a thermometer.

kilogram (kg)

second (s)

meter (m)

a.) Scientists no longer need an object in Paris, France to tell them how 

much mass is in a kilogram.

b.) The object which defines the mass of a kilogram is made

out of diamonds.

c.) The object which defines the mass of a kilogram has had different 

names over the years, like Grave, Gramme, and Le Grand K.

Video Questions

Warm Up

 page 1 of 2
3) Write a “T” next to each statement that you think is true, and an “F” next to each statement 

you think is false. 

5) Write a “T” next to each statement that you think is true, and an “F” next to each statement 

you think is false. 

4) Explain which statement about the second is false and why.

6) Explain which statement about the meter is false and why.

a.) Until the American Revolution, Americans used sundials to tell time.

b.) The current definition of the second comes from vibrations on a tiny atom. 

c.) As clocks improved, people started to divide time into smaller chunks. 

a.) A meter is longer than a yard.

b.) In the past, people used their hands, arms, and feet to define length.

c.) A meter is constantly stretching and compressing based on the changing 

speed of light.

By broadcasting a precise stream of invisible microwaves,

Professor Second has the power to fix any clock. A second 

is the time it takes for 9,192,631,770 “wiggles” from her 

cesium atoms to pass through a fixed point!

Instructions: After watching the video, complete the table below. 

Post Video Questions

What did you learn about the 

SI units we studied today?

What questions do you have about 

the SI units we studied today?

kilogram (kg)

second (s)

meter (m)

 page 2 of 2 www.nist.gov/education
Exhibit
      23.2








**JEFFREY
      TSANG & CO.**


**CERTIFIED
      PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**


Room
      1104, 11/F, Fourseas Building, 208 Nathan Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong
      SAR.


Tel:
      (852) 2781 1606      Fax: (852) 2783
      0752     E-mail: info@hkjtc.com








REPORT
      OF
      INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


TO
      THE
      BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS OF


SCORE
      ONE, INC.


(A
      NEVADA
      CORPORATION)








We
      have
      audited the accompanying balance sheet of Score One, Inc. as of December 31,
      2006 and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity,
      and cash flows for the two years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. These
      financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
      responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
      on
      our audits.





We
      conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
      Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
      plan
      and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
      financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not
      required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
      control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal
      control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures
      that
      are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing
      an
      opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
      reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
      examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
      in
      the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
      significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
      financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
      reasonable basis for our opinion.





In
      our
      opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
      material respects, the financial position of Score One, Inc. as of December
      31,
      2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the two years
      ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, in conformity with United States generally
      accepted accounting principles.






/s/
      JEFFREY TSANG & CO.





CERTIFIED
      PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS





Hong
      Kong


March
      20,
      2007