76386 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2014 / Notices 

ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR with 

applicable supporting documentation; 

including a description of the likely 

respondents, proposed frequency of 

response, and estimated total burden 

may be obtained free of charge from the 

RegInfo.gov Web site at http://

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/

PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=201406-1250-001 

(this link will only become active on the 

day following publication of this notice) 

or by contacting Michel Smyth by 

telephone at 202–693–4129, TTY 202– 

693–8064, (these are not toll-free 

numbers) or by email at DOL_PRA_

PUBLIC@dol.gov. 

Submit comments about this request 

by mail or courier to the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attn: OMB Desk Officer for DOL– 

OFCCP, Office of Management and 

Budget, Room 10235, 725 17th Street 

NW., Washington, DC 20503; by Fax: 

202–395–5806 (this is not a toll-free 

number); or by email: OIRA_

submission@omb.eop.gov. Commenters 

are encouraged, but not required, to 

send a courtesy copy of any comments 

by mail or courier to the U.S. 

Department of Labor-OASAM, Office of 

the Chief Information Officer, Attn: 

Departmental Information Compliance 

Management Program, Room N1301, 

200 Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20210; or by email: 

DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Contact Michel Smyth by telephone at 

202–693–4129, TTY 202–693–8064, 

(these are not toll-free numbers) or by 

email at DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. 

Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This ICR 

seeks to extend PRA authority for Office 

of Federal Contract Compliance 

Programs (OFCCP) construction 

recordkeeping and reporting 

requirements. The OFCCP administers 

three nondiscrimination and equal 

employment opportunity laws: 

Executive Order 11246, as amended; 

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended 

section 503 (29 U.S.C. 793); and 

Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment 

Assistance Act of 1974, as amended 

section 4212 (38 U.S.C. 4212). These 

authorities prohibit employment 

discrimination and require covered 

Federal contractors to take affirmative 

action to ensure that equal employment 

opportunities are available regardless of 

race, sex, color, national origin, religion, 

or status as an individual with a 

disability or protected veteran. 

Recordkeeping and reporting by Federal 

and Federally assisted construction 

contractors and subcontractors is 

necessary to substantiate their 

compliance with nondiscrimination and 

affirmative action contractual 

obligations. 

This information collection is subject 

to the PRA. A Federal agency generally 

cannot conduct or sponsor a collection 

of information, and the public is 

generally not required to respond to an 

information collection, unless it is 

approved by the OMB under the PRA 

and displays a currently valid OMB 

Control Number. In addition, 

notwithstanding any other provisions of 

law, no person shall generally be subject 

to penalty for failing to comply with a 

collection of information that does not 

display a valid Control Number. See 5 

CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6. The DOL 

obtains OMB approval for this 

information collection under Control 

Number 1250–0001. 

OMB authorization for an ICR cannot 

be for more than three (3) years without 

renewal, and the current approval for 

this collection is scheduled to expire on 

December 31, 2014. The DOL seeks to 

extend PRA authorization for this 

information collection for three (3) more 

years, without any change to existing 

requirements. The DOL notes that 

existing information collection 

requirements submitted to the OMB 

receive a month-to-month extension 

while they undergo review. For 

additional substantive information 

about this ICR, see the related notice 

published in the Federal Register on 

September 2, 2014 (79 FR 52044). 

Interested parties are encouraged to 

send comments to the OMB, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs at 

the address shown in the ADDRESSES

section within thirty (30) days of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. In order to help ensure 

appropriate consideration, comments 

should mention OMB Control Number 

1250–0001. The OMB is particularly 

interested in comments that: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Agency: DOL–OFCCP. 

Title of Collection: Office of Federal 

Contract Compliance Programs 

Construction Record keeping and 

Reporting Requirements. 

OMB Control Number: 1250–0001. 

Affected Public: Private Sector— 

businesses or other for-profits and notfor-profit institutions. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Respondents: 52,429. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Responses: 52,429. 

Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 

803,725 hours. 

Total Estimated Annual Other Costs 

Burden: $83,131. 

Dated: December 16, 2014. 

Michel Smyth, 

Departmental Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29830 Filed 12–19–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–CM–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–85,468] 

Comcast Cable Central Division 

Customer Care, Alpharetta, Georgia; 

Notice of Negative Determination 

Regarding Application for 

Reconsideration 

By application dated October 21, 

2014, workers requested administrative 

reconsideration of the Department of 

Labor’s negative determination 

regarding eligibility to apply for Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 

applicable to workers and former 

workers of Comcast Cable, Central 

Division Customer Care, Alpharetta, 

Georgia (subject firm). The 

determination was issued on September 

22, 2014. The Department’s Notice of 

determination was published in the 

Federal Register on October 21, 2014 

(79 FR 62971). 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) 

reconsideration may be granted under 

the following circumstances: 

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts 

not previously considered that the 

determination complained of was 

erroneous; 

(2) If it appears that the determination 

complained of was based on a mistake 

in the determination of facts not 

previously considered; or 

(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying 

Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of 

the law justified reconsideration of the 

decision. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2014 / Notices 76387 

The negative determination was based 

on the Department’s findings that the 

subject firm does not produce an article 

within the meaning of Section 222(a) or 

Section 222(b) of the Act. In order to be 

considered eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Section 223 

of the Trade Act of 1974, the worker 

group seeking certification (or on whose 

behalf certification is being sought) 

must work for a ‘‘firm’’ or appropriate 

subdivision that produces an article. 

The definition of a firm includes an 

individual proprietorship, partnership, 

joint venture, association, corporation 

(including a development corporation), 

business trust, cooperative, trustee in 

bankruptcy, and receiver under decree 

of any court. 

During the investigation, the 

Department obtained information that 

revealed that the subject firm did not 

produce an article; rather, the subject 

firm supplied services related to call 

center services. 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

workers assert that their jobs were 

outsourced to foreign countries but did 

not provide information pertaining to 

the subject firm producing an article. 29 

CFR 90. 

The petitioners did not supply facts 

not previously considered; nor provide 

additional documentation indicating 

that there was either (1) a mistake in the 

determination of facts not previously 

considered or (2) a misinterpretation of 

facts or of the law justifying 

reconsideration of the initial 

determination. Based on these findings, 

the Department determines that 29 CFR 

90.18(c) has not been met. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the application 

and investigative findings, I conclude 

that there has been no error or 

misinterpretation of the law or of the 

facts which would justify 

reconsideration of the Department of 

Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the 

application is denied. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 9th day of 

December, 2014 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29828 Filed 12–19–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–85,013] 

TRW Integrated Chassis Systems, LLC, 

North American Braking Division, a 

Subsidiary of TRW Automotive, 

Including On-Site Leased Workers 

From Adecco and DM Burr, Saginaw, 

Michigan; Notice of Negative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration 

By application dated October 15, 

2014, the United Automobile Workers 

(UAW), Local Union 467, requested 

administrative reconsideration of the 

Department of Labor’s negative 

determination regarding eligibility to 

apply for worker adjustment assistance, 

applicable to workers and former 

workers of TRW Integrated Chassis 

Systems, LLC, North American Braking 

Division, a subsidiary of TRW 

Automotive, Saginaw, Michigan (subject 

firm). The subject firm is engaged in 

activities related to the production of 

rotor and knuckle components and 

brake corners. The subject worker group 

includes on-site leased workers from 

Adecco and DM Burr. 

The denial notice was signed on 

February 26, 2014, and the Notice of 

Determination was published in the 

Federal Register on October 29, 2014 

(79 FR 64415). 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) 

reconsideration may be granted under 

the following circumstances: 

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts 

not previously considered that the 

determination complained of was 

erroneous; 

(2) If it appears that the determination 

complained of was based on a mistake 

in the determination of facts not 

previously considered; or 

(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying 

Officer, a mis- interpretation of facts or 

of the law justified reconsideration of 

the decision. 

The negative determination was based 

on the Department’s findings that the 

subject firm did not shift the production 

of articles like or directly competitive 

with rotor and knuckle components and 

brake corners to a foreign country; that 

imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with the rotor and knuckle 

components and brake corners did not 

contribute importantly to the workers’ 

separation or threat of separation and to 

the decline in sales or production of the 

firm; and that the subject firm is not a 

Supplier or Downstream Producer to a 

firm that employed a group of workers 

who received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 

U.S.C. 2272(a). 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

UAW asserts that the workers of the 

subject firm should be eligible for TAA 

because industry imports into the 

United States increased in the first 

quarter of 2014. The UAW, however, 

did not provide new information 

pertaining to 2012 and 2013, which are 

the time periods under investigation. 29 

CFR 90 

The petitioner did not supply facts 

not previously considered; nor provide 

additional documentation indicating 

that there was either (1) a mistake in the 

determination of facts not previously 

considered or (2) a misinterpretation of 

facts or of the law justifying 

reconsideration of the initial 

determination. Based on these findings, 

the Department determines that 29 CFR 

90.18(c) has not been met. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the application 

and investigative findings, I conclude 

that there has been no error or 

misinterpretation of the law or of the 

facts which would justify 

reconsideration of the Department of 

Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the 

application is denied. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 9th day of 

December, 2014. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29824 Filed 12–19–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration 

[Docket Nos. OSHA–2014–0020, 0017, 0010, 

0008, 0006, 0003, 0002, OSHA–2013–0014, 

0001, OSHA–2012–0056, 0053, 0052, 0051, 

0050, 0049, 0048, 0047, 0046, 0045, 0044, 

0043, 0042, 0041, OSHA–2011–0093] 

Authorization To Open Dockets of 

Denied Variance Applications for 

Public Access 

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA), Labor. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In this notice, OSHA 

announces its intent to update the 

publication of the dockets of variance 

applications that it denied in the past. 

Because OSHA denied these 

applications, it did not publish them in 

the Federal Register for public review. 

OSHA is making this information 

available to the public to enhance 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES