alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Medis Technologies Ltd.**

 

I,Robert K. Lifton, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A-1 of Medis Technologies Ltd.;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)             Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)            Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)             Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)             All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)            Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 28, 2004 | /s/ Robert  K. Lifton   |
|--------------------|-------------------------|
|               | Robert K. Lifton        |
|               | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

 

----
#### Elizabeth Coler, Appellant, *v.*Annie Judd, Respondent.

County Court, Rockland County,

November 22, 1924.

Replevin. — judgment in Justice’s Court dismissing plaintiff’s complaint, in action for replevin, reversed and cause sent back for new trial upon agreement of parties — complaint states cause of action though there has been no seizure of chattels.

A judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint, in an action for replevin in a Justice’s Court, will be reversed and a new trial directed, where both parties, disregarding a notice of appeal, acquiesced as to another trial.

An action in replevin may be maintained, without a seizure of the chattels, merely by serving a summons and complaint; therefore, plaintiff’s complaint, upon examination, states a cause of action, though there was no summary proceeding to replevy the chattels.

Appeal from a judgment, entered in a Justice’s Court for the town of Orangetown.

Foss *& Tedie [Alton W. Tedie*of counsel], for the appellant,

*John F. McFarlane,*for the respondent.

Patterson, J.:

Regardless of what the notice of appeal demanded, the appellant now requests a new trial in the Justice’s Court, and the respondent agrees to the same.

It seems as though, upon the trial of the action, the complaint was dismissed, upon the opening of the plaintiff’s case, upon counsel’s statement that it was an action in replevin, whereupon the record shows the defendant moved to dismiss the complaint, as there had been nothing replevied. Upon the argument before me the defendant stated that the plaintiff had agreed to this, and indeed urged that the complaint be dismissed if the justice held that the action was not one in replevin.

There is really nothing for me to decide. Both parties agree to a new trial before another justice, so I shall follow their desires and reverse the judgment and send it back for a new trial before Justice Bauer, to be tried at ten o’clock a. m. on the 28th day *23of November, 1924, at his court house in the town of Orangetown or at such other time as the justice may then direct.

The plaintiff did request that I decide what is now but an academic question, namely, whether the complaint does state an action in replevin, or not. It seems quite gratuitous to do so, but I do find that the complaint states an action in replevin. I do this on the authority of *Wagman*v. *Raynor*(163 App. Div. 68). I think it is well settled that an action in replevin may be maintained without a seizure of the chattels and by merely serving a summons and complaint. A summary proceeding to replevy is a concurrent remedy which the plaintiff may avail himself of or not, as he elects.

The appellant cites a number of cases to sustain this and nothing to the contrary has been called to my attention.

Judgment of reversal ordered as above, without costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1854 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1854

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Policy 
                    Committees for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Senate, Policy 
                    Committees for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR SENATE, POLICY 
              COMMITTEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Senate, Policy Committees 
for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $3,481,810.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 4.38


 


Non-executive director
appointment letter – Mr G Malcolm Williamson


 


The Non-executive director appointment letter of Mr G Malcolm
Williamson is incorporated by reference to National Australia Bank Limited’s
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Commission on January 20, 2005
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 11.0

                             BTU INTERNATIONAL, INC.
        CALCULATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
             (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED      FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                           -------------------------------  -----------------------------
                                              July 1,          July 2,          July 1,       July 2,
                                               2001             2000             2001          2000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                         <C>                <C>            <C>             <C>
Net (loss) income                           $(1,568)            $1,451         $(1,491)        $2,607
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net (loss) income applicable to
  common stockholders                       $(1,568)            $1,451         $(1,491)        $2,607
=========================================================================================================

Weighted average number of
  shares outstanding:

     Basic Shares                         6,966,509          6,869,417       6,952,798      6,849,262
     Effect of Dilutive Options                   0            453,616               0        448,998
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Diluted Shares                       6,966,509          7,323,033       6,952,798      7,298,260
=========================================================================================================
Earnings per Share

     Basic                                   $(0.23)             $0.21           (0.21)         $0.38

     Diluted                                 $(0.23)             $0.20           (0.21)         $0.36
=========================================================================================================
</TABLE>
#### Christianna Vinegar *v.*Andrew Jackson.

Pleading — Insufficient Answer.

Where a plaintiff avers he is the owner and entitled to the possession of real estate, an answer is bad which denies that the plaintiff is the owner and entitled to the possession, for the answer might he true and yet the plaintiff may be the owner of the land.

APPEAL PROM OWEN CIRCUIT COURT.

January 14, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

We do not regard the answer of the appellant as sufficient. She denies that appellee is the owner and entitled to the possession of twenty-four acres and one rood of land in her possession.

This answer may be true, and yet the appellee may be the owner of the land sued for. It would be strictly true if he was the owner, but was not entitled to possession, and it would be equally true although he was the owner and was also entitled to the possession, if, in fact, there was not as much land in the tract as it was alleged to contain. Two material allegations, ownership and right of possession, are grouped together with an allegation of the quantity of land in the tract, and these averments are denied as a whole. The allegation as to quantity was mere description, and whether there was that exact number of acres or not, the appellee had a right to recover whatever was in the tract if he was the owner, and entitled to the possession, and to hold the answer good, would be to hold that a mistake in an untrue allegation of mere matter of description, would defeat the plaintiff’s right of recovery.

*305*Strother & Orr, for appellant.*

*Grover &*Montgomery, *for appellee.*

In any view we have been able to take of the matter, the court properly disregarded the answer.

Judgment *affirmed.*
POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                  
                                  


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned Directors
and Officers of Millipore Corporation (the "Corporation"), do hereby
constitute and appoint John A. Gilmartin and Geoffrey Nunes and each
of them individually, their true and lawful attorneys and agents to
execute on behalf of the Corporation the Form 10-K Annual Report of
the Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995, and all
such additional instruments related thereto which such attorneys and
agents may deem to be necessary and desirable to enable the
Corporation to comply with the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any regulations, orders, or
other requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission thereunder in connection with the preparation and filing
of said Form 10-K Annual Report, including specifically, but without
limitation of the foregoing, power and authority to sign the names of
each of such Directors and Officers on his behalf, as such Director
or Officer, as indicated below to the said Form 10-K Annual Report or
documents filed or to be filed as a part of or in connection with
such Form 10-K Annual Report; and each of the undersigned hereby
ratifies and confirms all that said attorneys and agents shall do or
cause to be done by virtue thereof.


SIGNATURE                TITLE                    DATE



/s/John A. Gilmartin     Chairman, President      February 8, 1996
John A. Gilmartin        Chief Executive Officer
                         and Director



/s/Charles D. Baker      Director                 February 8, 1996
Charles D. Baker



_____________________    Director                 February __, 1996
Samuel C. Butler



/s/Maureen A. Hendricks  Director                 February 8, 1996
Maureen A. Hendricks



/s/Mark Hoffman          Director                 February 8, 1996
Mark Hoffman



Page 2
Power of Attorney



SIGNATURE                TITLE                    DATE



/s/Gerald D. Laubach     Director                 February 8, 1996
Gerald D. Laubach



/s/Steven Muller         Director                 February 8, 1996
Steven Muller



/s/Thomas O. Pyle        Director                 February 8, 1996
Thomas O. Pyle



/s/John F. Reno          Director                 February 8, 1996
John F. Reno
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,256,707
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  731,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     13,201
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,074,041
<PP&E>                                       6,602,364
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,847,054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,671,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,407,097
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,371
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,520,058
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,671,510
<SALES>                                      3,697,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,697,744
<CGS>                                        2,830,224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,830,224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               847,726
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             423,665
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (403,871)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (403,871)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (403,871)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  11,756
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (392,115)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.4

                                 Netegrity, Inc.

                            Certification Pursuant To
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Netegrity, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Regina O. Sommer, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date:  January 29, 2004                  /s/ Regina O. Sommer
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Regina O. Sommer
                                         Chief Financial Officer and
                                         Treasurer (Principal Financial
                                         Officer and Principal Accounting
                                         Officer)
<PAGE>   1
                        FIDUCIARY CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.


                        STATEMENTS OF COMPUTATION OF NET
                         INVESTMENT INCOME PER LIMITED
                                PARTNERSHIP UNIT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                For the Three Months                 For the Six Months
                                                    Ended June 30,                      Ended June 30,
                                             -----------------------------       -----------------------------
                                                2000              1999             2000              1999
                                             -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------

<S>                                          <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
Net Investment Loss                          $   (94,218)      $    (8,528)      $  (163,305)      $   (46,712)

Percentage Allocable to Limited Partners             100%               99%              100%               99%
                                             -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------

Net Investment Loss Allocable
   to Limited Partners                       $   (94,218)      $    (8,443)      $  (163,305)      $   (46,245)
                                             ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========

Weighted Average Number of Limited
   Partnership Units Outstanding               1,026,273         1,109,694         1,026,273         1,109,694
                                             ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========

Net Investment Loss Per Limited
   Partnership Unit                          $      (.09)      $      (.01)      $      (.16)      $      (.04)
                                             ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========
</TABLE>
----

|   | 1. | The                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended                June                30, 2006, (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements                of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act                of 1934,                as amended; |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Paul O. Koether                   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Paul                O. Koether                       |
| Chairman                                             |
|                                                 |   |
|                                                 |   |
|                                                 |   |
| /s/                Bryan P. Healey                   |   |
| Bryan                P. Healey                       |
| Chief                Financial Officer and Secretary |

----
M. R., MOTHER OF D. R. AND D. R.

, Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 1325

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 5, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Gilchrist County

. Monica J. Brasington , Judge

. Lindsey Lander, Trenton , for Appellant.

Ward L. Metzger, Appellate Counsel, Department of Children and Families, Jacksonville , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS

, WETHERELL

, and WINSOR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

DECEMBER 2, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED100736 CARL A. HOUSER, JR., APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, 

RES

2. ED101272 KEITH WILKINSON ETAL, APP V BARTON MUTUAL INS, 

RES