alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

OMAR SAUNDERS, 

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 7 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of July, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Does this Court’s holding in Commonwealth v. Alexander, 243 A.3d 177 

(Pa. 2020), require a fact specific assessment to determine whether 

exigency exists to provide officers with a right of access to the interior of an 

automobile under the plain view exception to the warrant requirement?
**Exhibit32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned officers of EXCO Resources, Inc. (the “Company”), does herebycertify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form10-Q. 

 
| Date:  November 6, 2007 | /s/ DOUGLAS H. MILLER   |   |
|------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                         | Douglas H. Miller       |
|                         | Chief Executive Officer |
|                         |                    |
|                         | /s/ J. DOUGLAS RAMSEY   |   |
|                         | J. Douglas Ramsey       |
|                         | Chief Financial Officer |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as anexhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K andSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and,accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is notincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.

 

1

----
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1958 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health 

and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration 

Rural Health for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 

the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration Rural Health for 

fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1958 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV3 ICES, HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES 

4 ADMINISTRATION RURAL HEALTH FOR FIS5 CAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Department of Health and Human Services, 

9 Health Resources and Services Administration Rural 

10 Health for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $317,794,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 193 

To provide that certain regulations shall have the force and effect of enacted 

law. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. ROSENDALE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide that certain regulations shall have the force and 

effect of enacted law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Teach Relevant Ap5 prenticeships to Drive Economic Success Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘TRADES Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. LEGAL EFFECT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The provisions of part 29 of title 

9 29, Code of Federal Regulations, relating to industry-rec10 ognized apprenticeship programs, as amended by the final 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 193 IH

1 regulations entitled ‘‘Apprenticeship Programs, Labor 

2 Standards for Registration, Amendment of Regulations’’ 

3 published by the Department of Labor in the Federal Reg4 ister on March 11, 2020 (85 Fed. Reg. 14294 et seq.) 

5 shall have the force and effect of enacted law. 

6 (b) FUNDING.—Amounts appropriated to carry out 

7 the Act of August 16, 1937 (commonly known as the ‘‘Na8 tional Apprenticeship Act’’; 50 Stat. 664, chapter 663; 29 

9 U.S.C. 50 et seq.) shall also be made available to carry 

10 out the provisions described in subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# Descriptive Information

https://srmors.nist.gov/view_detail.cfm?srm=3103a

# Instrument Sensitivity Test

# Solution Preparation

# Instrument Measurements

# Ratio Calculations

# Results (no drift correction)

# Results (no drift correction)

# Results (drift corrected)

# Results (drift corrected)

# Drift Pattern

# Correlation Diagnostic

# Correlation Diagnostic

# ttable

# Drift Correction Module
#### Tony TYSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis CALDERA, Secretary of the Army, The Pentagon, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-2368.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 15, 2001.

Decided May 25, 2001.

Kenneth Michael Robinson, Cameron Robinson Kourtesis, Sol Z. Rosen, Washington, DC, for appellant. Helen F. Fa-hey, United States Attorney, Lawrence R. Leonard, Managing Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.

Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Tony Tyson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Louis Caldera, Secretary, Department of the Army, in his employment discrimination action because Tyson failed to timely file an Equal Employment Opportunity charge. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Tyson v. Caldera,*No. CA-00-411-2 (E.D.Va. Oct. 10, 2000); *see*29 C.F.R. § 1614, 105(a); *Young v. National Ctr. for Health Serv. Research,*828 F.2d 235, 237 (4th Cir.1987). We deny Tyson’s motion to stay this appeal pending resolution of a complaint pending with the District of Columbia Office of Bar Counsel. We grant Tyson’s counsel’s motion to withdraw from further representation. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Silas Jones’s Heirs *v.*Nelson Jones, et al.

Administrator — Suit on Bond — Parties Plaintiff.

Where an administrator settles Ms accounts and has left in Ms hands a sum for distribution to the heirs of his decedent, but does not distribute, a joint suit may not be maintained by the heirs, but each has a separate cause of action against such administrator and his bondsmen.

APPEAL PROM OWEN CIRCUIT COURT.

January 7, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

In 1858 the appellee, Nelson Jones, administered .on the estate of Silas Jones, deceased, and executed bond, with Richard L. Jones as his surety, for the faithful discharge of his duties as such.

In 1861 the appellee, Nelson Jones, settled his accounts as administrator as aforesaid, and a balance of $979.15 were found in his hands for distribution among the heirs of his decedent.

In October, 1874, this suit in equity was brought jointly by the appellants as the heirs of the intestate against the administrator and his surety on the administration bond, to recover their respective shares of the amount ascertained by the settlement aforesaid to be in the hands of the administrator.

On the calling of the cause, appellees moved the court for a rule *286against the appellants to make them elect which of them would prosecute the suit, the rule being asked on the alleged ground that there was a misjoinder of plaintiffs. The rule was granted, and appellants immediately entered their appearance thereto, and declining to make any election, their petition was dismissed, and they have appealed.

There is no effort in the petition to surcharge the settlement made by the administrator, and no allegation that other assets had come to his hands, or that a further settlement was necessary; but it is a suit by the heirs to recover their several parts or shares of a definite and certain sum of money in the hands of the administrator. If the suit had been sought to settle the estate, or to surcharge the settlement previously made, the appellants doubtless might have united as co-plaintiffs. But where- a settlement has been made, to which there appears to be no objection, and by which the amount that each distributee is separately entitled to receive, is for all practicable purposes ascertained, each one’s right of action is separate, and independent of the others. There is no such unity of interests in the plaintiffs as authorized them to sue jointly; the judgment could not have been joint, since each plaintiff would be, in a proper proceeding, entitled to a several judgment for the amount due him or her respectively. Nor can the rights of the parties in this respect be changed by bringing the suit in equity.

Judgment *affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1927 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1927

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
                 Labor, Job Corps for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
                 Labor, Job Corps for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 
              JOB CORPS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Labor, Job 
Corps for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $0.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30146]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCOS00000 L10100000.BN0000 15X]


Notice of Public Meetings, Southwest Colorado Resource Advisory 
Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Southwest Colorado 
Resource Advisory Council (RAC) is scheduled to meet as indicated 
below.

DATES: The Southwest Colorado RAC meetings will be held on February 20, 
2015, in Montrose, Colorado, and May 8, 2015, in Durango, Colorado.

ADDRESSES: The Southwest Colorado RAC meetings will be held February 20 
at the Montrose Public Lands Center, 2465 S. Townsend Ave., Montrose, 
CO 81401; and May 8 at the San Juan Public Center, 15 Burnett Court, 
Durango, CO 81301. The meetings begin at 9 a.m. and adjourn at 
approximately 4 p.m. A public comment period regarding matters on the 
agenda will be held at 11:30 a.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori Armstrong, BLM Southwest District 
Manager, 970-240-5300; or Shannon Borders, Public Affairs Specialist, 
970-240-5300; 2505 S. Townsend Ave., Montrose, CO 81401. Persons who 
use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above 
individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours 
a day, seven days a week, to leave a message or question with the above 
individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Southwest Colorado RAC advises the 
Secretary of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of public land 
issues in Colorado. Topics of discussion for all Southwest Colorado RAC 
meetings may include field manager and working group reports, 
recreation, fire management, land use planning, invasive species 
management, energy and minerals management, travel management, 
wilderness, land exchange proposals, cultural resource management and 
other issues as appropriate.
    These meetings are open to the public. The public may present 
written comments to the RACs. Each formal RAC meeting will also have 
time, as identified above, allocated for hearing public comments. 
Depending on the number of people wishing to comment and time 
available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited.

Ruth Welch,
BLM Colorado State Director.
[FR Doc. 2014-30146 Filed 12-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
Exhibit 10.13


 





AMENDMENT
#4 TO JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT


 


WHEREAS,
CDx, Inc. ("CDX") and Next Dimension Technologies, Inc. ("NDT") are parties to a Joint Development Agreement
executed by the parties on November 1, 2013, as modified by Amendment #1, Amendment, #2, and Amendment #3 to the Joint Development
Agreement executed by the parties on April 21, 2014, July 1, 2015, and March 13, 2015, respectively (the "Agreement");
and


 


WHEREAS,
pursuant to Paragraph 11.3 of the Agreement, both parties now desire to further modify and amend the Agreement;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings of the parties as set forth below as well as other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, CDX and NDT do hereby mutually agree as follows:


 


1.
        With respect to Exhibit B, Paragraph 4, NDT agrees to extend, at no additional
cost, the license agreement negotiation period beyond ninety (90) days to no later than May 8, 2015.


 


2.
         All remaining terms and conditions of Agreement remain in full force and
effect, as modified and amended hereby and are hereby ratified by the parties.


 


3.
        After full execution of this Amendment #4, the Agreement shall be deemed to include
the modifications and amendments herein.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment #4 to be executed by their authorized representatives as of the respective
dates written below.


 




	CDX,
    Inc.	 	Next
    Dimension Technologies, Inc.  
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Daniel Yazbeck	 	By:	/s/
    William Royea
	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:	Daniel Yazbeck	 	Name:	William Royea
	Title:	President	 	Title:	President
	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:	May
    1, 2015	 	Date:	May
    1, 2015
#### In re: Stephen B. YOUNG, Petitioner.

No. 00-2646.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted March 16, 2001.

Decided June 5, 2001.

*397Before MURPHY, LAY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Steven B. Young, on behalf of his clients Associated Contract Loggers, Inc., and Olson Logging, Inc., filed a lawsuit in United States District Court for the District of Minnesota against the United States Forest Service and two not-for-profit groups, Forest Guardians and Superior Wilderness Action Network. *See Associated Contract Loggers, Inc., et al. v. United States Forest Service, et al.,*No 99-CV-1485. The suit alleged a violation of the Establishment Clause. After dismissing the suit pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), the district court1 ordered Young to show cause as to why sanctions should not be imposed against him for initiating a lawsuit without any reasonable basis in law. After considering Young’s brief in response to the Show Cause order, the district court imposed sanctions of $5,000 pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 11. Young appeals.

Finding that no error of law appears in the district court’s opinion, and that further opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm without discussion. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
#### The Detroit *&*Bay City Railroad Company v. James Graham, Highway Commissioner of the Township of Vassar.

*Condemnation for highway*— Award *of damages*— Certiorari.

An appeal to tlie township board from the decision of a highway com missioner in awarding damages for property taken for a highway is provided for by Comp. L. § 1264 (Act 216 of 1875); and if the only question is as to the amount of damages, *cei'iiorari*will not lie to the commissioner to remove the proceedings to the Supreme Court, where no reason is given for not resorting to the remedy by appeal

Certiorari.

Submitted June 23.

Writ quashed June 23.

*G. V.*N. *Lothrop*for plaintiff in certiorari.

*Black & Quinn*for defendant in certiorari.

Per Curiam.

In this case the only question involved is as to the proper amount of damages which should be awarded for the taking of the property of the Railroad for highway purposes. The statute has provided for an appeal from the Highway Commissioner to the Township Board. *645It must be presumed that if the commissioner refused to consider the proper elements of damage, the board would hare done justice on the appeal. We think the case should have been appealed, and as no sufficient reason appears why that remedy was not resorted to, we see no ground for permitting the *certiorari*to stand, and it must be dismissed as improvidently granted.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1895 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of 

Representatives, Allowances and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House 

of Representatives, Allowances and Expenses for fiscal 

year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, ALLOWANCES 

5 AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:47 Apr 14, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1895.IH H1895

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1895 IH

1 able for House of Representatives, Allowances and Ex2 penses for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $253,493,016. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1797 

To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to promulgate a consumer product safety standard with respect to rechargeable lithiumion batteries used in micromobility devices, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 24, 2023 

Mr. TORRES of New York (for himself, Mr. GARBARINO, Ms. CLARKE of New 

York, Mr. RYAN, Mr. BOWMAN, Mr. D’ESPOSITO, Mr. ESPAILLAT, and 

Mr. GOLDMAN of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to 

promulgate a consumer product safety standard with respect to rechargeable lithium-ion batteries used in micromobility devices, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Setting Consumer 

5 Standards for Lithium-Ion Batteries Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1797 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY STANDARD FOR CER2 TAIN BATTERIES. 

3 (a) CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY STANDARD RE4 QUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

5 enactment of this Act, the Consumer Product Safety Com6 mission shall promulgate, under section 553 of title 5, 

7 United States Code, a final consumer product safety 

8 standard for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries used in 

9 micromobility devices within the jurisdiction of the Com10 mission, including electric bicycles and electric scooters, 

11 to protect against the risk of fires caused by such bat12 teries. 

13 (b) CPSC DETERMINATION OF SCOPE.—The Con14 sumer Product Safety Commission shall specify the types 

15 of rechargeable lithium-ion batteries and the types of 

16 micromobility devices within the jurisdiction of the Com17 mission that are within the scope of subsection (a) as part 

18 of a standard promulgated under this section, as reason19 ably necessary to protect against the risk of fires caused 

20 by rechargeable lithium-ion batteries in consumer prod21 ucts. 

22 (c) TREATMENT OF STANDARD.—A consumer prod23 uct safety standard promulgated under subsection (a) 

24 shall be treated as a consumer product safety rule promulVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:16 Apr 07, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1797.IH H1797

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1797 IH

1 gated under section 9 of the Consumer Product Safety Act 

2 (15 U.S.C. 2058). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS