alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 15,409.

#### The State *v.*The Pennsylvania Company.

Filed December 13, 1892.

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

*J. C.*McNutt, *A. F. Wray, T. B. Adams, I. Garter, W. C. Hultz*and O. *B. Harris,*for appellant.

*S. Stansifer,*for appellee.

Olds, J.

This is an action to recover penalties accruing by reason of an alleged failure of the appellee to note the fact upon blackboards at certain stations along the appellee’s line of railroad, as to whether or not certain trains were late or not, and if late, how much, as provided by statute. The appellee addressed a demurrer to the complaint for want of facts, which was sustained and exceptions reserved. And this ruling is assigned as error. The same questions are presented in this case as were presented and decided in the case of *State v. Indiana, etc., R. R. Co.,*133 Ind. 69, this term, and on the authority of that case the judgment in this case is reversed, at costs of appelle, with instructions to the Circuit Court to overrule the demurrer to the complaint.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of HealthExtras, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|               |  |                                                                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|March 15, 2004 |  | /s/    David T. Blair                                                  
|               |  | David T. Blair Chief Executive
Officer and Director                    
|               | 
|               |  | /s/    Michael P. Donovan                                              
|               |  | Michael P. Donovan Chief
Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

|
|
! " #$%&' !
!
(! )*"*" 


#(+,-,,-+,	+$,$#	,

.


//////////"//////////

#

"0
















$"
(1

#(1


*2 0
1


!
 "0

2 0
1

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

	
	


	




#30 .


 .

.
4 
 !"" .
  
#$

%&'
 .

003"0
03"
)"
 
*
"


.."

" )"
5 
*6)

*7

0


)6.
#

"

$00""3 " #$

%88 9."

" .09: .
3*6"
0
"
.#;%4


.
"

""
.#$%&''&9.

<
..
6
33*)*
9

		..
0"1

-(+- ;	(,-.


="3
 "*603"
"


03"0
(as reflected in 

the last judgment issued)  0." ! "# 

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

		$


-<
3".
7"
3
9**3"".
> 0

 ".**
0



		



1

Judge’s signature

-


1

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

 Southern District of Alabama

DOUGLAS MCARTHUR WATTS, JR. 12-00069-001

16604-043

01-31-2014

Pro Se

✔

✔

120 96 months

01-31-2014

April 1, 2016

Senior United States District Judge

Callie V. S. Granade 

Senior U.S. District Judge

Digitally signed by Callie V. S. Granade Senior U.S. District 

Judge 

DN: cn=Callie V. S. Granade Senior U.S. District Judge, 

o=Federal Judiciciary, ou=U.S. Government, 

email=efile_granade@alsd.uscourts.gov, c=US 

Date: 2016.04.01 15:13:15 -05'00'

Case 1:12-cr-00069-CG-N Document 166 Filed 04/01/16 Page 1 of 1
#### Samuel Orr *v.*A. J. Colley.

Statute of Frauds — Contracts—Consideration.

A parol promise to pay the debt of another, not reduced to writing, is not enforcible because of tbe statute of frauds, but a contract with a debtor founded • upon a valuable consideration to pay tbe debt wbicb be, tbe debtor, owes to tbe creditor is binding.

Consideration.

Where one person in consideration of tbe sale of another’s interest in a certain business, promises to pay off a debt of such other person and fails to do so and hence tbe vendor of such business interest is forced to pay tbe same, be may recover tbe amount from bis vendee, who agreed to pay such debt.

*792APPEAL PROM GRAVES CIRCUIT COURT.

November 3, 1876.

*Stubblefield & Smith, for appellant.*

*J. C. Gilbert, W. W. Tice, for appellee.*

Opinion by

J udge Elliott :

It appears from the record that the sheriff of Graves county had rented what was known as the Waller and Pryor house in Mayfield, Graves county, Ky., to another, Gardner, and that afterwards Gardner rented the lower east room to the appellee and J. N. Colley, to be kept and used as a barroom, at the price of one hundred thirty-five dollars, due the first day of January, 1865.

The evidence conduces to show that some time after this contract was made appellee sold his interest in said barroom to the appellant and B. F. Colley, and his former partner, J. N. Colley, and that by the terms of said sale the said appellant and B. F. Colley were to pay off and discharge the $135 note executed by appellee to Gardner, which they failed to do. Judgment having been obtained against said appellee by Gardner, and he having paid the same, he instituted this action to recover the amount so paid. The important question involved is as to whether the promise by appellant, if made, to pay said npte to Gardner, is binding although not made in writing. A parol promise to pay the debt of another is not enforcible by reason of the statute of frauds, but a contract with a debtor founded upon a valuable consideration to pay the debt which he, the debtor, owes to the creditor, is binding, and a recovery can be had for its violation. *North v. Robinson,*1 Duv. 73.

If, therefore, appellant promised the appellee, in consideration of the sale of the said appellee’s interest in the said barroom and grocery, to pay off and discharge the said note executed by said appellee to Gardner, for the rent of said house, and failed to do so, and afterwards said appellee was by legal coercion forced to pay the same, there can be no doubt but that he could recover the amount so paid against said appellant.

The evidence is conflicting as to the agreement by appellant to pay the Gardner note; but the cause was submitted to a jury, and as the evidence was conflicting, their verdict must be considered conclusive on the facts of said case; and in our opinion the law was correctly ruled by the instructions of the court.

The judgment must be *affirmed.*
MD5(win7_32slice1.zip)= 05d79f442f5c900698007d13b6842107
SHA1(win7_32slice1.zip)= e37b99e65db24cc09b8744a2fe9d8dc14ad56a96
SHA256(win7_32slice1.zip)= a1ec96d306023fdab5d8452ffd8ca74aa34fa982277fd84b5579d8c7680ff1d4
MD5(win7_32slice2.zip)= ec2b28ccdaa97bbd67c9882a74553697
SHA1(win7_32slice2.zip)= be51e65b0d682a6df5d5a1290e0da812ed547f3b
SHA256(win7_32slice2.zip)= 594547fee2c7ee755ce86a9910f9b68579e377cc0d7ea8504d4cac2e0ff5f61e
MD5(win7_32slice3.zip)= 12e72c0075c5c768cd701b27b2ab4410
SHA1(win7_32slice3.zip)= 9ae882c19e95766c50c50d3726ccf47bafeaee32
SHA256(win7_32slice3.zip)= 6723fcc8292c5145621b560dbbae70b4f62eaa96a1de57f5e19bbefbde901943
MD5(win7_32slice4.zip)= 38b0c99fc019ca5827f83dc7bd40464f
SHA1(win7_32slice4.zip)= 73a7ffdee9d3e3066f2a621b6274369bd5f60b66
SHA256(win7_32slice4.zip)= 1f8bfd83d50d0d8beda2152a94e56df8a8bfde798eaf166be2860a554af38e8a
MD5(win7_32slice5.zip)= 7a89970fa76b94af134c1aefb5f180e0
SHA1(win7_32slice5.zip)= 0e0572e6231b1133e0cb8f5e77e3bb27a76dc35c
SHA256(win7_32slice5.zip)= 872433274e959a20d8008c79783f565b20afe2b0388f1450cb18ef4b9e0c0e00
MD5(win7_32slice6.zip)= d6f34c93cef52f60cf7213c5fb3dd96f
SHA1(win7_32slice6.zip)= 5e013d7fad2b998231a79ec525bc277034296cf1
SHA256(win7_32slice6.zip)= adad6dfc0de996b3d33d42eba614cd810e005b61a95d574ebaed8b0689f2f4c4
EX-10.21



 Exhibit 10.21 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED UNDER RULE 406 UNDER 

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. 

[*****] INDICATES OMITTED MATERIAL THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF A CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT 

REQUEST FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. THE OMITTED MATERIAL 

HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. 

February 5, 2014 
 Dr. Timo Veromaa 

President and CEO 
 Biotie Therapies Corp. 

Joukahaisenkatu 6 
 F1-20520 Turku 

Finland 
 Re: Phase 2 Milestone 

Dear Dr. Veromaa: 
 Reference is made to the License and
Commercialization Agreement effective as of November 21, 2006, as amended (the “Agreement”) between Medarex, Inc., now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (“BMS”) and BioTie Therapies Corporation
(“BioTie”). 
 Pursuant to Section 3.3.1 of the Agreement, BioTie is required to pay BMS [*****] with respect to its anti-VAP1 antibody
product, MDX1352/BTT1023. 
 MDX1352/13TT1023 is currently in Phase I clinical trial and BioTie is preparing the initiation of Phase II trial in which
approximately [*****] patients will be enrolled. Due to the complexity and certain unpredictability of the outcome, BioTie seeks, and BMS hereby consents, to restructure this milestone payment, such that BioTie will make an initial,
nonrefundable instalment of [*****] pursuant to the timing specified in Section 3.3,1, followed up by a second instalment of [*****] BioTie agrees to share the results of any such analysis with BMS within 60 days of the completion of said
analysis. 
 If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please sign a duplicate original of this letter in the space provided and return it for our
records. 
  

							
	Sincerely yours,				
			
	/s/ Arthur H. Bertelsen				
			
					BioTie Therapies Corporation
	Arthur H. Bertelsen, Ph.D.						
	Vice President, Research Collaborations						 /s/ Timo Veromaa

					Name:		Timo Veromaa
					Title:		CEO
CAFN_Ex10-5


		
			EXHIBIT 10.5
		

		
			 
		

		
			Amendment #2 to Term Note 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Effective Date:  May 4, 2015 
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, Cachet Financial Solutions Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“Company” or “Borrower”), and The Margaret De Jonge Trust (“Lender”) (collectively “Parties”) entered into a Term Note for $613,808, effective December 14, 2012 (the "Agreement"); and 
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the payment terms as set forth in the Agreement to require Borrower to make eight $50,000 payments beginning May 31, 2015 and extend the Maturity Date of the Agreement to December 31, 2015. 
		

		
			 
		

		
			NOW THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
		

		
			 
		

		
			1.Capitalized terms not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.
		

		
			 
		

		
			2.The second paragraph of the Agreement shall be amended and restated in its entirety asset forth below.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Borrower will pay this loan according to below payment schedule with all outstanding principal plus all accrued, unpaid interest becoming due on December 31, 2015 (the “Maturity Date”), subject to any prepayment. 
		

		
			Payment Schedule 
		

		
			 
		

		
			-$50,000 due on May 31, 2015;
		

		
			-$50,000 due on June 30, 2015;
		

		
			-$50,000 due on July 31, 2015;
		

		
			-$50,000 due on August 30, 2015;
		

		
			-$50,000 due on September 30, 2015;
		

		
			-$50,000 due on October 31, 2015;
		

		
			-$50,000 due on November 30, 2015;
		

		
			-The remaining balance of accrued, unpaid interest and principal due on December 31, 2015
		

		
			 
		

		
			3.All terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, except to the extent specifically modified herein.
		

		
			 
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized representative as of the Effective Date written above. 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						Lender:

					
					
						 

					
					
						Cachet Financial Solutions Inc.

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ Margaret De Jonge

					
					
						 

					
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ Jeffrey C. Mack

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Margaret De Jonge

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						Jeffrey C. Mack

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Lender

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned, as Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of BTU International, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the
Report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Thomas P. KealyThomas P. KealyVice President, Corporate Controllerand Chief Accounting Officer (principalfinancial and accounting officer)


Dated: August 10, 2007
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 12.1


                              Cherokee International, LLC
                      Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                              (In thousands, except ratios)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                   Nine Months       Three Months
                                                                                      Ended              Ended        Year Ended
                                                 Year Ended December 31            December 31,        March 31,     December 31,
                                            --------------------------------     ---------------    --------------  --------------
                                             1999         1998         1997           1996               1996             1995
<S>                                          <C>         <C>          <C>             <C>                <C>            <C>
Earnings

     Income before income taxes             $16,552      $23,900      $18,538          $7,614             $644             $528
     Fixed charges                           11,294          860        1,504           1,953              211              745
                                           ---------    ---------    ---------       ---------           ------         -------
           Total Earnings                   $27,846      $24,760      $20,042          $9,567             $855           $1,273
                                          =====================================================================================


Fixed Charges

      Interest                              $10,675         $373        $1,065         $1,638             $152             $509
      Implicit rental interest expense          619          487           439            315               59              236
                                           ---------     --------     ---------       --------           ------            ----
            Total Fixed Charges             $11,294         $860        $1,504         $1,953             $211             $745
                                           ====================================================================================


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges             2.5x        28.8x         13.3x           4.9x             4.1x             1.7x

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.33

FIRST AMENDMENT  TO  HUNTSMAN SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE MPP PLAN

This First Amendment to the HUNTSMAN SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE MPP PLAN (the "Plan") is entered into this 10 day of November 2006.

WHEREAS,
the parties desire to amend the Plan to reflect additional changes in the Plan required for compliance with the current interpretation of Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code and the transitional relief thereunder.

NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1.Effective January 1, 2005, Section 4.6 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:



2.The provisions of this First Amendment shall supercede the terms of the Plan to the extent those terms are inconsistent
with this First Amendment.

DATED
the day and year first above written.

| |  | HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL LLC
| |  | --------------------------
| |  | By:                       
| |  |                           

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Century Pacific Tax Credit Housing
Fund II (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James V. Bleiler, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.



/s/ James V. Bleiler
------------------------
James V. Bleiler
Chief Financial Officer
July 5, 2005
UNITED STATES
                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

                           FORM 10-Q

            QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
              OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


           For the Quarter ended September 30, 1996

              Commission file number     33-24537


            CENTURY PACIFIC TAX CREDIT HOUSING FUND II
      (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


          CALIFORNIA                       95-4178283
(State of other jurisdiction of            (IRS Employer
incorporation of organization)             Identification Number)


1925 Century Park East, Suite 1760
Los Angeles, CA                            90067
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code:
(800) 262-8242


No Change
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year if changed
since last report)


Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.


Yes  [x]          No  [ ]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 6, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-61173

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RONDALL MULLINS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:02-CR-60-MPM-ALL

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rondall Mullins appeals the district court’s revocation of his

supervised release and imposition of a term of imprisonment. See

18 U.S.C. § 3583(g). He argues that the district court erred in

not imposing substance-abuse treatment pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§3583(d) in lieu of incarceration. Mullins committed several

violations of the conditions of his supervised release. Failure of

a drug test was but one of those violations. Moreover, the

district court considered but rejected the available treatment
No. 04-61173

-2-

options. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d). Accordingly, there was no error

in the district court’s revocation of supervised release and

imposition of a term of imprisonment.

AFFIRMED.
#### Joseph Leland v. Mary Kauth.

*Indecent asscmlt*— Cross-examination *of defendant.*

In a civil action for an indecent assault it was *held*proper to cross-examine the defendant as to whether he was ever arrested on a criminal charge made by a woman, and whether he settled it by payment.

Where the defendant in a civil action for an indecent assault appears as a witness therein, it is admissible for its bearing on his credibility, to cross-examine him as to the antecedents of his life, if the questions do not call for self-crimination.

Error to Saginaw.

Submitted Jan. 12.

Decided Jan. 18.

Case. Defendant brings error.

Affirmed.

*Edgeb d> Broolcs*for plaintiff in error.

Evidence of defendant’s reputation four years before trial is remote: *Keator v. People*32 Mich. 486; and evidence of reputation in another county, five years before trial, is inadmissible in the absence- of special circumstances: *Webber v. Hanke*4 Mich. 198; such evidence, if admitted, is likely to bias the jury: *People v. Schweitzer*23 Mich. 304.

*Herman Pistorius*for defendant in error.

A witness may be cross-examined as to his antecedents: *Hamilton v. People*29 Mich. 183; *Clemens v. Conrad*19 Mich. 174; *Threadgool v. Litogot*22 Mich. 271; *Beebe v. Knapp*28 Mich. 72.

*509Graves, C. J.

The defendant in error brought this action for an indecent assault, and the parties were the main witnesses. In every essential matter they contradicted each other, and the result depended on their comparative credit in the opinion of the jury.

As bearing on Leland’s trustworthiness as a witness, the court allowed him to be asked, on cross-examination, if he was ever arrested on a criminal charge wherein Amelia Rietsman was complainant and whether he settled it by the payment of money. He admitted that he was so arrested some nine years before and that he gave a little money to settle it, and denied that he was guilty.

The permission of these inquiries on the cross-examination is complained of on several grounds, but we think the criticism is not warranted. The jury were required to decide on the value of his testimony tendered in his own behalf and it was competent to call upon him to inform them of such antecedents of his life, not amounting to self-crimination, as would assist them in placing an accurate estimate upon his statements as a witness, and the questions objected to called for nothing more.

There was no error, and the judgment must be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.