alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          131279
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    77378
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                208657
<PP&E>                                         4247527
<DEPRECIATION>                                    7664
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4448520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           973541
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       2192242
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4448520
<SALES>                                          36691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 36691
<CGS>                                            34581
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    34581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                285508
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (285902)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IB 

Union Calendar No. 750 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1419 

[Report No. 118–918] 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to issue a new rule removing the 

Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem population of grizzly bears from 

the Federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2023 

Mr. ROSENDALE (for himself, Mr. ZINKE, and Ms. HAGEMAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

DECEMBER 18, 2024 

Additional sponsor: Mr. STAUBER

DECEMBER 18, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1419 RH

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to issue a new rule 

removing the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem 

population of grizzly bears from the Federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 1419 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Comprehensive Grizzly 

5 Bear Management Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF NORTHERN CONTINENTAL DIVIDE 

7 ECOSYSTEM POPULATION OF GRIZZLY BEARS 

8 FROM FEDERAL LIST OF ENDANGERED AND 

9 THREATENED WILDLIFE. 

10 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact11 ment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall issue 

12 a final rule removing the Northern Continental Divide 

13 Ecosystem population of grizzly bears from the Federal 

14 list of endangered and threatened wildlife without regard 

15 to any other provision of law that applies to the issuance 

16 of such rule. Such issuance and this section shall not be 

17 subject to judicial review. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Union Calendar No. 750 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1419 

[Report No. 118–918] 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to issue a 

wildlife. the Federal list of endangered and threatened vide Ecosystem population of grizzly bears from new rule removing the Northern Continental DiDECEMBER 18, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 23




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-82948 and No. 333-41895) pertaining to the Incentive Stock
Option and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan and Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-41893) pertaining to the 1997 Non-Employee Directors' Equity Incentive
Plan of Moore Products Co. of our report dated January 28, 1999, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Moore Products Co.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                                  \s\ Ernst & Young LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 25, 1999

                                       48
#### TAYLOR v. CRAIN et al.

No. 181.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

June 6, 1951.

Motion to Vacate or Amend Order Denied July 14, 1951.

Hymen Schlesinger, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for libellant.

H. A. Robinson (Dickie, Robinson & McCamey), of Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondents.

BURNS, District Judge.

The instant libel, which asserts that libellant suffered personal injuries in the employ of respondents on a steamer owned or operated by respondents, was filed more than five years after the alleged injury occurred. Respondents have moved to dismiss the libel on the ground of laches.

This motion to dismiss is equivalent to a peremptory exception. The delay of libellant in seeking relief through the courts creates a presumption of preju*150dice to respondent. Kane v. U.S.S.R., 3 Cir., 1951, 189 F.2d 303. Although the motion of respondent was filed more than eight months ago, libellant has failed to plead or offer to prove facts negativing laches or tolling the statute. See Redman v. United States, 2 Cir., 1949, 176 F.2d 713, 715. The libel contains only the bare statement that the captain of the vessel informed libellant “that if no claim were filed, the respondents would see that libel-lant received steady employment but that if claim were filed, libellant would be through working on the rivers and that they, the respondents, would prevent libel-lant from obtaining employment with other firms operating vessels on the rivers.” There is no averment that respondents failed to meet their alleged commitment to “see that libellant received steady employment”, or that libellant acted in timely fashion following any such failure. Moreover, I have grave doubts whether a promise to find employment for libellant and a warning against filing suit would be legally sufficient either to excuse laches or to toll the running of a statute of limitations. In any event, I believe libellant has slept on any rights he may have had for an unconscionable period of time, and that the prolonged failure of libellant to meet the challenge posed by the motion warrants dismissal of the libel.
11321.

#### Gilbert *v.*The State.

Decided June 15, 1920.

Indictment for misdemeanor; from Laurens superior court — Judge Kent. February 5, 1920.

Gilbert was indicted under section 387 of the Penal Code (1910), the indictment charging him with having used obscene, vulgar, and profane language in the presence of a female. One of the grounds of the motion for a new trial was that the court permitted a named witness to testify that the defendant was drunk; the defendant’s attorney objecting to this testimony on the ground that it was irrelevant, immaterial, and prejudicial. In the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error it was requested that the Court of Appeals request the Supreme Court to overrule or modify the ruling made in *Pierce*v. *Slate,*53 *Ga.*365, as to proof of drunkenness in such a case.

*W. A. Dampier, S. P. New,*for plaintiff in error.

*E. L. Stephens, solicitor-general,*contra.

Ltjke, J.

1. Tlie evidence in this case amply supported the verdict of guilty, and there was no error in the admission of evidence.

2. The assignment of error upon the alleged improper argument of counsel for the State raises no question for the determination of this court, since no motion for a mistrial was made.

3. For no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Broyles, *C.*J., *and*Bloodworth, *J., concur.*
EXHIBIT
23.1


















Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm







We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-8 (File No. 333-105557 and 333-137281) of Medis Technologies Ltd. of our
reports dated March 30, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Medis Technologies Ltd., and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting of Medis Technologies Ltd., included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.





Tel-Aviv, Israel

                March
      30, 2009
              Kost Forer Gabbay
      & Kasierer
                A Member of Ernst & Young
      Global
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          18,840
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               1
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   637
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     89,456
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         585,643
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           571,362
<LOANS>                                      2,292,277
<ALLOWANCE>                                     27,906
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,044,610
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,655,840
<SHORT-TERM>                                   885,928
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             40,196
<LONG-TERM>                                    270,512
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                     192,059
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,044,610
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 46,664
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               11,492
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                58,156
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              19,594
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,101
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           21,055
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      565
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,246
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,262
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,262
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.78
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.72
<LOANS-NON>                                     13,167
<LOANS-PAST>                                       933
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   506
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                29,013
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    (504)
<RECOVERIES>                                        50
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               27,906
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            27,906
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 12





BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION





COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES





|                                                                           |  | Year Ended
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------
|
|Earnings:                                                                 
|Earnings (loss) before income tax expense                                  |  | (7,966    
|Add:                                                                       |  |           
|                                                                          
|Interest on advances and other borrowings                                  |  | 18,054    
|Interest component of rental expense                                       |  | 545       
|                                                                           |  |           
|Earnings before fixed charges excluding interest on customer deposits      |  | 10,633    
|Interest on customer deposits                                              |  | 43,921    
|                                                                           |  |           
|Earnings before fixed charges                                              |  | 54,554    
|                                                                           |  |           
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Fixed Charges:                                                            
|Interest on advances and other borrowings                                  |  | 18,054    
|Interest component of rental expense                                       |  | 545       
|                                                                           |  |           
|Fixed charges excluding interest on customer deposits                      |  | 18,599    
|Interest on customer deposits                                              |  | 43,921    
|                                                                           |  |           
|Total fixed charges                                                        |  | 62,520    
|                                                                           |  |           
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges including interest on customer deposits |  | 0.87      
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges excluding interest on customer deposits |  | 0.57
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000840401
<NAME>                        ACCUHEALTH, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000
<CURRENCY>                                USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                             212
<SECURITIES>                     3,647
<RECEIVABLES>                   17,193
<ALLOWANCES>                    (2,502)
<INVENTORY>                      2,969
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                21,971
<PP&E>                           6,067
<DEPRECIATION>                  (3,252)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  26,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           18,199
<BONDS>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          1
<COMMON>                            51
<OTHER-SE>                         462
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    26,199
<SALES>                          9,973
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 9,973
<CGS>                            6,026
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    9,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 456
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (266)
<INCOME-TAX>                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (266)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                      (266)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (.08)
        

</TABLE>
#### Henry *W.*Pardo et al. v. John Bittorf.

*Motion to dismiss*— Settlement *of case.*

Where a case is not heard on testimony taken in open court there is-nothing to settle, and a motion to dismiss such a case on the ground, that it has not been settled will be denied.

Motion to dismiss.

Submitted October 4, 1881.

Denied October 5.

*Fraser dk Gates*for the motion.

*Aikmson dk Aildnson*against.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6142

SCOTT E. RING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RON ANGELONE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.

(CA-96-1-MC-R)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Scott E. Ring, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion for a temporary restraining order and/or a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Ring v. Angelone, No. CA-96-1-MC-R

(W.D. Va. Jan. 5, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000839950
<NAME> NORTH COUNTRY ENERGY, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,759,554
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,853,456
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    209,787
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,137,797
<PP&E>                                      52,619,579
<DEPRECIATION>                            (16,005,214)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,549,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,444,857
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,067
<COMMON>                                        45,572
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,274,832
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,549,564
<SALES>                                      2,414,469
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,414,469
<CGS>                                        2,556,620
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,556,620
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (17,573)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             436,281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (560,859)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (560,859)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (560,859)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


CERTIFICATIONS

I, Ingo K. Kozak the Vice President Finance & Administration and CFO, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bio-Lok International
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, nor misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flow of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for the
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have;

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regards to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: September 17, 2002               /s/ Ingo K. Kozak, VP - Finance and CFO
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Signature and Title