alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### City of Paducah *v.*L. Y. Craig.

Damages for Killing Dog — City Ordinance.

Where a city ordinance in its penal provisions provides that dogs unmuzzled may be killed, but the language of the ordinance is such as to apply only to the dogs of persons in said city, and does not in terms apply to non-resident owners, the city will be liable to such non-resident owners whose dogs are killed by city officers under such ordinance.

APPEAL FROM McCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT.

February 12, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The ordinance under which the city of Paducah claims that it had the right to cause the dog of appellee to be killed, provides that the mayor may, in his discretion, issue a proclamation ordering all dogs running at large within the corporate limits of the city to be muzzled, and to remain muzzled during the continuance of such time as the mayor may prescribe. It then provides that “all persons owning a dog or dogs in said city failing to comply with the provisions, and permitting his dog or dogs to fun at large without being muzzled, the city marshal or any policeman is authorized to kill said dog or dogs.” It is evident from this language used, that the penal portion of this ordinance is confined to the dogs of persons in said city. *359It does not, in terms, apply to dogs owned by persons living out of the city, and as it inflicts the “death penalty without due process of law” its application will not be extended by implication. It results therefrom, as the answer of the city does not controvert the fact that appellee resides outside of the city limits, that it caused and procured his dog to be killed, that it presented no defense to the action. Every material averment stood uncontroverted, and the only issue to be tried was as to the value of the dog.

*J. Q. A. King, for appellant.*

*L. D.*Husbands, *for appellee.*

Upon that issue appellee was entitled to conclude the argument. The court did not err in giving and refusing instructions, and we cannot say that the value fixed upon the dog is so outrageous as to indicate that the jury was influenced in their action by passion or prejudice.

Judgment *affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          48,412
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,469
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (14,984)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,335
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           7,964
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,629)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         46,963
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,834
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,019
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,934
<SALES>                                         26,662
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,340
<CGS>                                           22,965
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 392
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,147)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,447)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,447)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.47)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          71,752
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,786
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               192,538
<PP&E>                                       4,221,045
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,413,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          295,791
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    16,268,330
<OTHER-SE>                                (36,768,802)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,413,583
<SALES>                                        123,473
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               123,473
<CGS>                                           50,151
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,151
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,020
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,349)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,349)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,349)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7587

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus SAMUEL BENJAMIN KELLY, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:98-cv-00569; 2:94-cr-00163-RBS-4) Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: November 27, 2006 Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Benjamin Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Samuel Benjamin Kelly seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his motion to reconsider the court’s denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Kelly has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Additionally, we construe Kelly’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to- 3 - file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255 (2000). Kelly’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



Doral Financial Corporation
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
 Quarter endedMarch 31, 2005Including Interest on DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax income from continuing operations
    
    $
    49,613Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    141,311Total Earnings
    
    $
    190,924Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    140,046Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized
expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    430An estimate of the interest component within rental
expense
    
    
    835Total Fixed Charges before preferred dividends
    
    
    141,311Preferred dividends
    
    
    8,325Ratio of pre tax income to net income
    
    
    1.265Preferred dividend factor
    
    
    10,528Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    151,839Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock
Dividends
    
    
    1.26Excluding Interest on DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax income from continuing operations
    
    $
    49,613Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    118,854Total Earnings
    
    $
    168,467Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    117,589Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized
expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    430An estimate of the interest component within rental
expense
    
    
    835Total Fixed Charges before preferred dividends
    
    
    118,854Preferred dividends
    
    
    8,325Ratio of pre tax income to net income
    
    
    1.265Preferred dividend factor
    
    
    10,528Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    129,382Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock
Dividends
    
    
    1.30
USGv6 Test Selection Tables 

IPv6-Only Requirements

A2-Functional: IPv6-Only R1v1.1

Applicable Profile: NIST SP 500-267B Revision 1 USGv6 Profile – November 2020.

Test Specification Id: 

• [IPv6-Only] IPv6-Only Network Functional Test Plan, [editor: UNH InterOperability Laboratory].

IPv6-Only Test Check List

Reference

Test 

Specification 

Id

Test Number Device Type

USGv6-R1 IPv6-Only IPv6Only.1.1: Online Installation Application / Host /

Router / NPP /Switch

USGv6-R1 IPv6-Only IPv6Only.1.2: Online Update Application / Host / 

Router / NPP /Switch

USGv6-R1 IPv6-Only IPv6Only.1.3: User Initiated Management/Monitoring 

Access

Application / Host / 

Router / NPP /Switch

USGv6-R1 IPv6-Only IPv6Only.1.4: Devices Initiated Management/Monitoring 

Functions

Application / Host / 

Router / NPP /Switch

USGv6-R1 IPv6-Only IPv6Only.1.5: User Interface (A)(B) Application / Host / 

Router / NPP /Switch

USGv6-R1 IPv6-Only IPv6Only.1.6: Logging (A) (B) Application / Host / 

Router / NPP /Switch

References: 

• [NIST IPv6 Profile] "NIST IPv6 Profile", NIST Special Publication (NIST SP) - 500-267Ar1, November 

2020.

• [USGv6-R1] "USGv6 Profile", NIST Special Publication (NIST SP) - 500-267Br1, November 2020.

The objective of this test selection sheet is to provide a reference for available test specifications that identifies tests 

applicable to the USGv6 Profile.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1457 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to take certain actions with respect 

to certain qualified coal applications, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2023 

Ms. HAGEMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to take certain 

actions with respect to certain qualified coal applications, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Combating Obstruction 

5 Against Leasing Act’’ or the ‘‘COAL Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LEASING FOR CERTAIN QUALIFIED COAL APPLICA7 TIONS. 

8 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

9 (1) COAL LEASE.—The term ‘‘coal lease’’ 

10 means a lease entered into by the United States as 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1457 IH

1 lessor, through the Bureau of Land Management, 

2 and the applicant on Bureau of Land Management 

3 Form 3400–012. 

4 (2) QUALIFIED APPLICATION.—The term 

5 ‘‘qualified application’’ means any application pend6 ing under the lease by application program adminis7 tered by the Bureau of Land Management pursuant 

8 to the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.) 

9 and subpart 3425 of title 43, Code of Federal Regu10 lations (as in effect on the date of the enactment of 

11 this Act), for which the environmental review proc12 ess under the National Environmental Policy Act of 

13 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) has commenced. 

14 (b) MANDATORY LEASING AND OTHER REQUIRED

15 APPROVALS.—As soon as practicable after the date of the 

16 enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall promptly— 

17 (1) with respect to each qualified application— 

18 (A) if not previously published for public 

19 comment, publish a draft environmental assess20 ment, as required under the National Environ21 mental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 

22 seq.) and any applicable implementing regula23 tions; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1457 IH

1 (B) finalize the fair market value of the 

2 coal tract for which a lease by application is 

3 pending; 

4 (C) take all intermediate actions necessary 

5 to grant the qualified application; and 

6 (D) grant the qualified application; and 

7 (2) with respect to previously awarded coal 

8 leases, grant any additional approvals of the Depart9 ment of the Interior or any bureau, agency, or divi10 sion of the Department of the Interior required for 

11 mining activities to commence. 

12 SEC. 3. FUTURE COAL LEASING. 

13 Notwithstanding any judicial decision to the contrary 

14 or a departmental review of the Federal coal leasing pro15 gram, Secretarial Order 3338, issued by the Secretary of 

16 the Interior on January 15, 2016, shall have no force or 

17 effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

    CORESTATES FINANCIAL CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2

    COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
    TO FIXED CHARGES OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS

    COMBINED CORESTATES (PARENT ONLY) AND CORESTATES CAPITAL CORPORATION

    Twelve Months Ended December 31, 1997
    -------------------------------------

     1. Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed
        income of subsidiaries...................................... $ 691,924


     2. Fixed charges - interest expense, amortization of debt
        issuance costs and one-third of rental expenses, net of
        income from subleases.......................................   218,404
                                                                     ---------

     3. Income before taxes, equity in undistributed income of
        subsidiaries, plus fixed charges............................ $ 910,328
                                                                     =========


     4. Ratio of earnings (as defined) to fixed charges
        (line 3/line2)..............................................     4.17%
                                                                         ====
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 244 (Friday, December 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 75800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29706]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-595-000 ]


Covanta Fairfax, Inc.; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Covanta Fairfax, Inc.'s application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is December 29, 2014.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89cfccdbcac6e7e5e0e7ecdafcf9f9e6fbfdc9efecfbeaa7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="85c3c0d7c6caebe9ecebe0d6f0f5f5eaf7f1c5e3e0f7e6abe2eaf3">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 8, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29706 Filed 12-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
! " #$%&' !
!
(! )*"*" 


#(+,-,,-+,	+$,$#	,

.


//////////"//////////

#

"0
















$"
(1

#(1


*2 0
1


!
 "0

2 0
1

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

#30 .


 .

.
4 
 !"" .
  
#$

%&'
 .

003"0
03"
)"
 
*
"


.."

" )"
5 
*6)

*7

0


)6.
#

"

$00""3 " #$

%88 9."

" .09: .
3*6"
0
"
.#;%4


.
"

""
.#$%&''&9.

<
..
6
33*)*
9

IT IS ORDERED..
0"1

-(+- ;	(,-.


="3
 "*603"
"


03"0
(as reflected in 

the last judgment issued)  0."is reduced to 

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

-<
3".
7"
3
9**3"".
> 0

 ".**
0



IT IS SO ORDERED



1

Judge’s signature

-


1

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

 Southern District of Alabama

DAVID PLATA SEGOVIA 09-00067-001 and 11-00064-001

62362-019

12-21-2012

Dom Soto

✔

✔

238 186 months

12-21-2012

04-13-2015

11-01-2015 United States District Judge

Callie V.S. Granade 

U.S. District Judge

Digitally signed by Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge 

DN: cn=Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge, o=U.S. 

Government, ou=Federal Judiciary, 

email=efile_granade@alsd.uscourts.gov, c=US 

Date: 2015.04.10 12:39:39 -06'00'

Case 1:11-cr-00064-CG-B Document 52 Filed 04/13/15 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30007]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; NHLBI Research Training.
    Date: January 14, 2015.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 
7196, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Charles Joyce, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review/DERA National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7196, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 
301-435-0288 <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f0939a9f899395b09e989c9299de9e9998de979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a8cbc2c7d1cbcde8c6c0c4cac186c6c1c086cfc7de">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 17, 2014.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy
[FR Doc. 2014-30007 Filed 12-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>