alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John V. Winfield, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of The InterGroup
Corporation

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: October 7, 2004                         /s/ John V. Winfield
                                              ---------------------------
                                              John V. Winfield, President
                                              and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NATURES WAY MARINE, LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-0316-CG-M

)

EVERCLEAR OF OHIO, LTD, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

This cause came on for a telephone conference this date on Defendant 

Everclear of Ohio, Ltd.’s Motion to Continue Trial (Doc. 155). 

Upon due consideration of the motion and the representations of counsel 

during the conference, the court finds that a continuance is necessary. The jury 

trial of this action is hereby CONTINUED to the November 2014 trial term, 

commencing with jury selection on November 4, 2014. Trial will begin on November 

17, 2014 at 9:00 a.m., to be held in Courtroom 2B, United States Courthouse, 

Mobile, Alabama.

The parties are directed to inform the court of the new date set for the 

mediation conference either by contacting chambers or the clerk.

DONE and ORDERED this 26th day of August, 2014.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00316-CG-M Document 157 Filed 08/26/14 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

HEARTLAND BARGE MANAGEMENT, *

L.L.C., *

 * 

Plaintiff, *

 *

vs. * Civil Action No. 09-00585-KD-B

 *

DIXIE PELLETS, L.L.C., et al., *

 *

 Defendants. *

 

 

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated February 2, 2010, is ADOPTED as the

opinion of this Court. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint by March 8, 2010.

DONE and ORDERED this the 22nd day of February 2010.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00585-KD-B Document 48 Filed 02/22/10 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   1-MO                   8-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-03-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-02-1997
<CASH>                                               5                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        180                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     215                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                             40                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             1                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                         139                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       215                       0
<SALES>                                             13                      54
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    14                      61
<CGS>                                               12                      53
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       13                      60
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                     (2)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                      17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                    (80)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                      90
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0                      10
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gerard Poliquin, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Gerard Poliquin,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-28826 Filed 12-4-14; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
Exhibit 31.01

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Chuck Bay, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K of Kana Software, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 19, 2004

/s/ Chuck Bay		Chuck Bay
Chief Executive Officer
#### Hiram Lunsford and Wife *v.*Lewis Stamper, et al.

Wills — Indebtedness.

The indebtedness of a person does not prevent him from disposing of his property by will, but his devisees take their interests subject to the payment of the testator’s debts.

Suits by Creditors.

Creditors cannot reach and dispose of the interests of devisees by a judicial proceeding to which such devisees were not parties.

APPEAL PROM LEE CIRCUIT COURT.

November 19, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

Notwithstanding Jameson Irvine may have been in debt at and before the time of his death, he had the right, under the statute, to dispose of his estate by last will and testament. His devisees took their respective interests, it is true, subject to the payment of the testator’s debts; but his will having been duly published, and regu*539larly and legally put to record, they each took under it the title devised; and the creditors could not reach and dispose of the interest of either of them by a judicial proceeding to which he or she was not made a party.

*A. W. Turinn, for appellants. H. C. Lilly, for appellees.*

Davis Irvine took no more than a life estate in the realty devised to him. The remainder was devised to the present appellant Mrs. Nancy Lunsford, his infant child. She was not made a party defendant to either the action of Bowman or that of Park, the executor of Monegal. Hence the judgments in their favor and against the executors of the testator and his children, could not affect her title as devisee.

The executions to be issued on these judgments were directed to be levied, first of assets in the hands of the executors, and then of estate that had descended from the deceased debtor to his children named therein. Nothing descended to Mrs. Lunsford. She took under the will, and as we have already said, she was not a party to the action in which the judgments were rendered. The execution sales passed to the purchaser merely the life estate of her father. He purchased back no greater interest, and sold nothing more to his vendee. It does not matter that he attempted to sell and convey the fee. He had no right to sell any such estate; and he could not prejudice the legal right of the infant remainderman by attempting to sell it. His vendees, whether immediate or remote, are charged with notice of the title of Mrs. Lunsford. It was matter of record, and the regularly probated will of Jameson Irvine was notice to the world.

The statute of limitation interposes no obstacle to the action of Mrs. Lunsford.' She was not entitled to the possession of the lands sued for until the death of her father, the life tenant, and he did not die until 1872.

Judgment *reversed*and cause remanded for -a judgment in favor of the appellants for the possession of their lands. In order to determine the questions of rents and improvements, the parties should be allowed, in case they so desire, to take further proof.
Order entered August 2, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01026-CV

IN RE REGINALD NOBLE, Relator

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F00-50025-K

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of today’s date, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 23.02**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-87505, 333-92159, 333-93591,333-32460, 333-35730, 333-64552, 333-59842, 333-55822 and 333-104711) of KANA Software, Inc., previously Kana Communications, Inc., of our report dated March 17, 2004, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, whichappears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

 

August 26, 2005
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Salim Ghafari, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB  of Life  Energy &
Technology Holdings, Inc.

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
exchange act rules 13a-14 and 15d- 14) for the registrant and have:

     A) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
     B) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "evaluation date"); and
     C)  presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the evaluation date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     A) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     B) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: January 15, 2004

By:/s/Salim Ghafari
-----------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains financial information extracted from the Company's interim
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-12-1996
<CASH>                                          31,539
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    138,072
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               209,217
<PP&E>                                         872,288
<DEPRECIATION>                                 414,503
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,126,569
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          159,846
<BONDS>                                        600,355
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           40,243
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (52,564)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,126,569
<SALES>                                      1,260,235
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,260,235
<CGS>                                          876,178
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  876,178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               413,082
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              56,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (85,886)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (11,421)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (74,465)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (74,708)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (7.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Gerald R. BYRD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BP AMOCO POLYMERS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Movant.

No. 01-1138.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 17, 2001.

Decided May 23, 2001.

Gerald R. Byrd, pro se. Ingrid Black-welder Erwin, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, Greenville, SC, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Gerald R. Byrd appeals the district court’s order of summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Byrd v. BP Amoco Polymers,*No. CA-99-3649-6-13AK (D.S.C. Jan. 19, 2001). We deny Byrd’s motion for production of documents and motion to compel delivery of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit102DyerEmploymentAgreement


Exhibit 10.2

11215 Metro Parkway
Fort Myers, Florida 33966
(239)277-6200






March 6, 2015    




Mr. David F. Dyer
##################
##################




RE:  Fiscal Year 2015 Compensation and Benefits Package


Dear Dave:
This letter is to confirm our agreement that your compensation and benefits package for fiscal year 2015 for your service as the Chief Executive Officer at Chico’s FAS, Inc. (the “Company”) will be identical to the terms and conditions for fiscal 2014 as set forth in our letter agreement to you dated March 3, 2014, including Exhibits A and B, with the following modifications:
Equity Award:        
For the 2015 annual equity grant, you received an equity award with value of approximately $6.625 million on the grant date, March 2, 2015.  Approximately 50% of the grant-date fair value of the award is in the form of restricted stock. The restricted stock will vest over a 3-year period with one-third of the restricted stock grant vesting on each anniversary of the grant date. The balance of the equity award is in the form of performance share units (PSUs).  You will have the opportunity to earn between 0 to 150% of the target PSUs awarded with the actual number of PSUs earned based on the 2015 RONA targets as outlined in the PSU award agreement. If earned, the PSUs will vest over a 3-year period with one-third of the earned PSUs vesting on each anniversary of the grant date.  
Please indicate your acceptance of the above by signing below and returning one copy to my attention. By signing this letter you warrant your acknowledgement the at-will nature of our relationship, and that you are not party to any agreement that bar or limit the scope of your employment with the Company.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at your convenience.
Very truly yours,


Ross Roeder
Chairman of the Board
Chico’s FAS, Inc.










Page 2 – Fiscal Year 2015 Compensation and Benefits Package






Accepted by:












	
			
	/s/ David F. Dyer                
	 
	03/16/2015                     

	David F. Dyer
	 
	Date










                    
                            
Cc:  John Mahoney, Chairman, Compensation and Benefits Committee, Chico’s FAS Inc. Board of Directors