alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                           2,744
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                       377
<INVENTORY>                                     10,421
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,304
<PP&E>                                           4,429
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,681
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,803
<SALES>                                         45,647
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,952
<CGS>                                           31,610
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,062
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (35)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  62
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,332
<INCOME-TAX>                                       900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,432
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,432
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56



</TABLE>
#### T. C. & J. Newcombe *v.*Tolle, Holton & Co.

Bankruptcy as Defense — Answer.

An answer setting up bankruptcy, to be good, must aver that plaintiffs proved their debts in the bankrupt court, or that the defendant had been adjudged a bankrupt, or that the defendant had been discharged by the proceedings in bankruptcy from said debts.

APPEAL FROM FLEMING CIRCUIT COURT.

September 18, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

It is alleged in the answer by appellants that they had filed their petition in the United States District Court at Louisville under the bankrupt laws of the United States for a discharge in bankruptcy, as per Exhibit A, and they therefore protest and object to this court’s taking jurisdiction of this case.

But it is not alleged in the answer that appellees had proved their debts against the appellants in the bankrupt court, nor had been adjudged bankrupt, nor that appellants had been discharged by the proceedings in bankruptcy from said debts.

*826*W. H.*Card, *for appellants. W. S.*Botts, *for appellees.*

Section 21 of the general bankrupt laws of 1867 provides that no creditor who proves his debt or claim shall be allowed to maintain any suit át law or in equity therefor against the bankrupt, etc.

Their answer, therefore, in order to have presented a good defense to the action, should have alleged that appellees had proved their debts in the bankrupt court, or that appellants had been adjudged bankrupt, or had been discharged from said debts by the judgment of said court, and neither averment having been made, the demurrer was properly sustained.

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00549-CV

HOA DAO

v.

HOMEOWNERS OF AMERICA MGA, INC.

On Appeal from the

151st District Court of Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-60198

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are assessed against 

the party incurring the same.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 12, 2021
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. (“CRM”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerome S. Flum, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/
Jerome S. FlumJerome S. FlumChief Executive Officer





August 7, 2009








This certification is being furnished to the SEC with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section.




18
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David K. Spohr, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of World Monitor Trust II  Series E for the period January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                          
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David K. Spohr
|Name:              |  | David K. Spohr                                           
|Title:             |  | Senior Vice President and Director of Fund Administration
|                   |  | (Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)                 
|                   |  | Preferred Investment Solutions Corp.,                    
|                   |  | Managing Owner of                                        
|                   |  | World Monitor Trust II  Series E                        
|                   | 
|Date:              |  | March 20, 2009
11644.

#### MANNING *v.*THE STATE.

Decided July 28, 1920.

To warrant a conviction of a felony on the testimony of an accomplice, there must be such corroborating circumstances as will in themselves and independently of that testimony lead to an’ inference of the guilt of the accused. No .evidence in this case outside of that of an alleged accomplice connects the accused with the perpetration of the crime or leads to an inference of his guilt.

Indictment for larceny of hog; from Brooks superior court — Judge Thomas. May '6, 1920.

*Bennet & Harrell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Clifford E. Hay, solicitor-general,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of simple larceny (hog-stealing). The chief witness against him was an alleged accomplice. While the question as to whether or not there is sufficient corroboration of the testimony of the accomplice to produce conviction of the defendant’s guilt is peculiarly for the jury, and while it is true that slight evidence corroborating the testimony of the accomplice may be sufficient to authorize a jury to find the defendant guilty, this corroborating evidence must *within itself*connect the defendant with the crime. It is “an inflexible rule ” that “ in order to warrant a conviction of a felony upon the testimony of an accomplice, the corroborating circumstances must be such as would lead to the inference that 'the defendant is .guilty independently of the testimony of the accomplice.” *Butler*v. *State,*17 *Ga. App. 522*(1) (87 S. E. 712). See eases there cited; and see also *Nance*v. *State,*126 *Ga.*95*553(1) (54 S. E. 712). Eliminating from this ease the testimony of the alleged accomplice, there is left no evidence “to connect the accused with the perpetration of the offense and lead to the inference of his guilt.”

*Judgment reversed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
PROMISSORY NOTE

$25,000                                       May 27, 2004






         FOR  VALUE  RECEIVED,  the  undersigned  Mendocino  Partners,  Inc.,  a
Delaware  corporation  ("Maker") promises to pay to the order of Arrakis Select,
Ltd.  ("Lender"),  at his  principal  office,  or at such other  place as may be
designated  in writing by the  holders of this  Promissory  Note  ("Note"),  the
principal  sum of TWENTY  FIVE  THOUSAND  AND  00/100  DOLLARS  ($250,000)  (the
"Principal Sum"). The unpaid Principal Sum shall bear interest at 8% until paid.

         The unpaid  Principal Sum and all accrued but unpaid  interest  thereon
shall be due and payable on demand.

         All  payments  to be made  under  this Note  shall be payable in lawful
money of the United States of America which shall be legal tender for public and
private debts at the time of payment.

         In the event that an action is  instituted to collect this Note, or any
portion  thereof,  Maker promises to pay all costs of collection,  including but
not limited to reasonable  attorneys'  fees, court costs, and such other sums as
the court may establish.

         In the event of a default  under this Note when due, then the holder of
this Note, at its election,  may declare the entire unpaid Principal Sum and all
accrued but unpaid interest thereon immediately due and payable.

         Every provision  hereof is intended to be several.  If any provision of
this Note is  determined,  by a court of competent  jurisdiction  to be illegal,
invalid or unenforceable,  such illegality, invalidity or unenforceability shall
not  affect  the  other  provisions  hereof,  which  shall  remain  binding  and
enforceable.

         This Note is made in the State of California and it is mutually  agreed
that  California  law  shall  apply  to  the  interpretation  of the  terms  and
conditions of this Note.

         All  agreements  between  the  holder of this Note and Maker are hereby
expressly limited so that in no contingency or event whatsoever,
 whether by reason of deferment or  acceleration of the maturity of this Note or
otherwise,  shall the rate of interest hereunder exceed the maximum  permissible
under  applicable  law with  respect to the holder.  If, from any  circumstances
whatsoever,  the rate of interest  resulting  from the payment and/or accrual of
any amount of interest  hereunder,  at any time that  payment of interest is due
and/or at any time that interest is accrued,  shall exceed the limits prescribed
by such  applicable  law, then the payment and/or accrual of such interest shall
be reduced to that resulting from the maximum rate of interest permissible under
such applicable law. This provision shall never be superseded or waived.

The makers, endorsers,  and/or guarantors of this Note do hereby severally waive
presentment,  demand,  protest  and  notices of protest,  demand,  dishonor  and
nonpayment.



<PAGE>


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed as of the date first hereinabove
set forth.



MENDOCINO PARTNERS, INC.



------------------------------
Jehu Hand, Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1543 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1543

 To direct the Secretary of Labor to ensure that the database relating 
    to investigations under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 is 
              language accessible, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2023

 Ms. Garcia of Texas (for herself, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Allred, 
  Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Norton, Mr. Soto, Mr. Veasey, and Mr. Green of 
    Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Labor to ensure that the database relating 
    to investigations under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 is 
              language accessible, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANGUAGE ACCESSIBLITY OF DATABASE OF INVESTIGATIONS UNDER 
              FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT.

    In maintaining the database containing information relating to 
investigations under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
202 et seq.), as required pursuant to the amendments made by the OPEN 
Government Data Act, the Secretary of Labor shall ensure that the 
information in such database is publicly accessible in at least 8 of 
the most commonly spoken languages in the United States, as determined 
by the Bureau of the Census.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of BTU
International, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

     1.   the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
          ended October 2, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company for the periods covered by the Report.


                                        /S/ Thomas P. Kealy
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Thomas P. Kealy
                                        Vice President, Corporate Controller
                                        and Chief Accounting Officer (principal
                                        financial and accounting officer)

Dated: November 16, 2005


                                       23
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000

<CASH>                                         9,841,018
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         4,744,784
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               1,230,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    513,558
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        134,633,036
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,841,964
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 158,146,256
<DEPOSITS>                                     145,045,348
<SHORT-TERM>                                   1,263,259
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1,238,506
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       775,325
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,823,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 158,146,256
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                9,900,992
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              77,972
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               145,174
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               10,124,138
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             4,476,775
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,639,274
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          5,484,864
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  606,244
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                4,752,716
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,658,722
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,658,722
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,025,722
<EPS-BASIC>                                    1.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 10.34
<LOANS-NON>                                    1,436,877
<LOANS-PAST>                                   1,382,431
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,338,691
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  125,339
<RECOVERIES>                                   22,369
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,841,964
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,841,964
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        1,838,416



</TABLE>
exv10w47



 






Exhibit 10.47




AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN




     APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., having adopted the Applied Materials, Inc. Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) effective as of July 1, 1993, amended and restated the Plan in its
entirety effective as of April 1, 1995, and amended the restated Plan on three subsequent
occasions, hereby again amends the restated Plan, effective as of December 31, 2004, as follows:



     1. Section 9.1 is amended by deleting the last sentence thereof.



     2. A new Section 9.4 is added immediately after Section 9.3 to read as follows:




     “9.4 Freezing of Plan. Notwithstanding any contrary Plan provision, the Plan
is frozen effective as of December 31, 2004. After December 31, 2004, no new Participants
will be admitted to the Plan, and Compensation Deferrals will be discontinued. Each
Participant’s Account will continue to be maintained until it has been distributed to him or
her (or, in the event of death, the Participant’s Beneficiary) in accordance with the
provisions of the Plan, unless the Plan is terminated at an earlier time pursuant to this
Section 9.”



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Applied Materials, Inc., by its duly authorized officer, has executed this
Amendment No. 4 to the restated Plan effective as of the date specified above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	     /s/ Robert G. Hartley
 	 
	 	 	Title:  Vice President, 	 
	 	 	          Compensation & Benefits
NUMBER 13-16-00489-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE SERAFIN GARCIA, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A

CHAPO’S AUTO SALES

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Per Curiam Order

Relator, Serafin Garcia, individually and d/b/a Chapo’s Auto Sales, filed a petition 

for writ of mandamus in the above cause on September 13, 2016. Through this original 

proceeding, relator seeks to compel the trial court to (1) vacate its order denying relator’s 

motion to dismiss and plea to the jurisdiction, and (2) grant relator’s plea to the jurisdiction 

and dismiss the case. The Court requests that the real party in interest, Jocelyn Kie, or 

any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response 
2

to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date 

of this order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

13th day of September, 2016.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File No.  333-61694 and File No.  333-75994) and on Form
S-3 (File No.  333-72430) of HealthExtras,  Inc. of our report dated February 5,
2002, except for the third paragraph of Note 3, as to which the date is March 1,
2002, relating to the consolidated  financial  statements,  which appear in this
Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



McLean, Virginia
March 29, 2002
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

STEVEN KEITH GLATFELTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0122-CG-B

)

SAM COCHRAN, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Gladfelter’s claims against 

Defendants Cochran, Oliver, Stallworth, and Williams be DISMISSED with prejudice as 

frivolous; that his claims against Defendant Barrett seeking to impose liability based on others’ 

actions be DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous; that his claims against Defendant Barrett for 

ignoring Plaintiff’s requests be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim; and 

that his claims against Defendants Simmons and Ezell be DISMISSED without prejudice for 

failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

DONE and ORDERED this 20th day of May, 2014.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00122-CG-B Document 17 Filed 05/20/14 Page 1 of 1