alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

v. ) Criminal Action No. 11-00336-KD

)

DEWEY ROSHAUN PRUITT, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This action is before the Court on the defendant’s motion for reduction of sentence 

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). (Doc. 41)

Effective November 1, 2014, the United States Sentencing Commission enacted 

Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. In general, Amendment 782

reduces the base offense levels assigned to particular controlled substance quantities in the Drug 

Quantity Table, U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c), and thus operates to reduce the applicable guideline ranges.

The Commission has deemed Amendment 782 to apply retroactively. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(d).

Defendant moves the Court to apply the modified Sentencing Guidelines scheme 

effectuated by Amendment 782. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), the Court is empowered to 

reduce the Defendant’s sentence under these circumstances. See generally United States v. 

Armstrong, 347 F.3d 905, 909 (11th Cir. 2003) (“[A]mendments claimed in § 3582(c)(2) 

motions may be retroactively applied solely where expressly listed under § 1B1.10(c).”)1

(emphasis in original). 

After review of the motion and all relevant factors prescribed by § 1B1.10 and 

Application Note 1(B), the Court has determined that a reduction of sentence based on the 

 1 Section 1B1.10(c) has been renumbered as § 1B1.10(d) by Amendment 782.

Case 1:11-cr-00336-KD-B Document 44 Filed 12/31/14 Page 1 of 2
amended guideline range may be appropriate in this case. Defendant’s original guideline range 

was 57 to 602 months and the Court imposed a low-end sentence of 57 months. According to the 

revised guideline calculation prepared by the United States Probation Office, Defendant’s 

revised guideline range is 46 to 57 months after retroactive application of Amendment 782. 

Imposing a similar low-end sentence would result in a sentence of 46 months. 

Accordingly, unless either party files a written objection on or before January 30, 2015,

the Court will enter an order reducing the Defendant’s term of imprisonment to 46 months, 

effective November 1, 2015. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(e).3

DONE and ORDERED this the 30th day of December 2014. 

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 2

 The statutory maximum penalty for the offense for which Pruitt was convicted. 

3

 “(e) Special Instruction.-- (1) The court shall not order a reduced term of imprisonment based 

on Amendment 782 unless the effective date of the court's order is November 1, 2015, or later.”

Case 1:11-cr-00336-KD-B Document 44 Filed 12/31/14 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000840459
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND XVIII LTD PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,796,274
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,356
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,835,630
<PP&E>                                      14,430,578
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,244,275)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,021,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          313,170
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,708,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,021,933
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               820,779
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  311,804
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                508,975
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            508,975
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   508,975
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    23.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    23.54
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.6


 





AMENDMENT TO THE


AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


 


This Amendment (“Amendment”)
is entered into as of the 27th day of May 2015, by and between Home Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”) and Joseph B.
Zanco (the “Executive”).


 


WITNESSETH


 


WHEREAS, the
Bank and the Executive previously entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2011 (the “Agreement”);
and


 


WHEREAS, the
parties desire to amend the Agreement in order to extend its term, as provided in Section 2(b) thereof.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:


 


1.     The
last sentence in Section 2(a) of the Agreement is amended and restated to read as follows: “The terms and conditions of this
Agreement shall be and remain in effect during the period beginning on the Effective Date of this Agreement and ending on June
22, 2017, plus such extensions, if any, as are provided pursuant to Section 2(b) hereof (the “Employment Period”).”


 


2.     Except
to the extent expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue unmodified and shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Amendment has been duly executed by the parties hereto as of the day and year first written above.


 


 





	 	HOME BANK, N. A.
	 	 
	 	 
	 	By:   /s/
John W. Bordelon
	 	John W. Bordelon
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 
	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ Joseph B. Zanco
	 	Joseph B. Zanco
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 244 (Friday, December 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 75809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29758]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of the Termination of the 
Receivership of 10361, First Choice Community Bank Dallas, Georgia

    Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (``FDIC'') as Receiver for First Choice Community Bank, 
Dallas, Georgia (``the Receiver'') intends to terminate its 
receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed receiver of 
First Choice Community Bank on April 29, 2011. The liquidation of the 
receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by 
available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making 
a final dividend payment to proven creditors.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. 
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this Notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing 
and sent within thirty days of the date of this Notice to: Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 32.1, 1601 
Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.
    No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this time frame.

    Dated: December 16, 2014.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29758 Filed 12-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**UNDER 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

            With reference to the quarterly Report of Redwood Empire Bancorp (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004  (the“Report”), I, Patrick W. Kilkenny, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,

            (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

| /s/ Patrick W. Kilkenny               |
|---------------------------------------|
| Patrick W. Kilkenny                   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                        |
| Date:  November 2, 2004          |
#### William Tilman *v.*Abner Carey.

Foreign Judgments — Defense.

Where a judgment is rendered in Ohio, the court having jurisdiction over the subject-matter and parties, no defense can be interposed to a suit brought upon it in Kentucky which would have constituted a defense in the original action in Ohio.

APPEAL PROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT.

January 28, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

After a careful examination of the record in this case, we are unable to perceive any error in the proceedings in the court below that will authorize a reversal of the judgment.

It appears in the record that appellant was actually served with summons in the proceedings in Ohio, and that the court that rendered the judgment had jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action. The judgment must, therefore, be regarded here as conclusive of the rights of the parties. Appellant cannot go behind that judgment, and now plead matters in defense which would have constituted a defense to the original action in Ohio-. We do< not construe the judgment of the justice of the peace of Ohio as exceeding his jurisdiction. It is only for $300 and costs, which costs are the mere incident to the judgment; besides, if the judgment had exceeded *337said sum, the plaintiff could remit the excess. And it is not a reversible error, i Swan & Critchf. R. S. Ohio 788.

Hawkins, *for appellant.*

*Fearsons, for appellee.*

The judgment must be *affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Cash Financial Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Douglas Orr, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  October 21, 2010  /s/ R. Douglas Orr R. Douglas Orr Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**TITLE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Enzo Biochem, Inc., and Subsidiaries (“the Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Dated: December 10, 2008 |   | By:    | /s/ Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.                    |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                     |   |   |                                              |
|                          |   |   | Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Victor E. Grijalva, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofWorldQuest Networks, Inc. certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of WorldQuestNetworks, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; and  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: April 30, 2004
By:     /s/ Victor E. Grijalva                    
Victor E. Grijalva,
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1452 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1452

 To amend the Frank LoBiondo Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2018 to 
   direct the Commandant of the Coast Guard to provide certain data 
           related to water quality, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2023

Mr. Garamendi introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Frank LoBiondo Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2018 to 
   direct the Commandant of the Coast Guard to provide certain data 
           related to water quality, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INFORMATION ON TYPE APPROVAL CERTIFICATES.

    (a) In General.--Title IX of the Frank LoBiondo Coast Guard 
Authorization Act of 2018 (Public Law 115-282) is amended by adding at 
the end the following:

``SEC. 904. INFORMATION ON TYPE APPROVAL CERTIFICATES.

    ``The Commandant of the Coast Guard shall, upon request by any 
State, the District of Columbia, or territory of the United States, 
provide all data possessed by the Coast Guard pertaining to challenge 
water quality characteristics, challenge water biological organism 
concentrations, post-treatment water quality characteristics, and post-
treatment biological organism concentrations data for a ballast water 
management system with a type approval certificate approved by the 
Coast Guard pursuant to subpart 162.060 of title 46, Code of Federal 
Regulations (or successor Federal regulations).''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents for the Frank 
LoBiondo Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2018 (Public Law 115-282) is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 903 the 
following:

``904. Information on type approval certificates.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derrick Lamar WARREN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-10318.

D.C. No. CR-99-40254-DLJ.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2001.*

Decided May 30, 2001.

Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Derrick Lamar Warren appeals his guilty plea conviction for one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Warren contends that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) is unconstitutional under the Commerce Clause in light of *United States v. Lopez,*514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995), *United States v. Morrison,*529 U.S. 598, 120 S.Ct. 1740, 146 L.Ed.2d 658 (2000), and *Jones v. United States,*529 U.S. 848, 120 S.Ct. 1904, 146 L.Ed.2d 902 (2000). As Warren concedes, however, this court’s rejection of that ar*578gument in *United States v. Jones,*231 F.3d 508, 514-15 (9th Cir.2000) is dispositive.1

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *578courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Warren's request for an initial hearing en banc is denied as untimely. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 35(c).
AO 245D (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations (12368)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE

V. (For Revocation of Probation or Supervised Release)

RODNEY EUGENE HILL CASE NUMBER: 1:12-CR-00166-002

USM NUMBER: 12813-003

THE DEFENDANT: Peter J. Madden, Esquire

Defendant's Attorney

admitted guilt to violation of supervision conditions: 9, 2 & 8 as set forth in the Petition dated 

5/22/2015.

was found in violation of supervision condition: 

Violation Number Nature of Violation

Date violation

Occurred

9

2

8

Technical

Technical

Technical

The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 2 of this judgment. The sentence is 

imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.

The defendant has not violated condition(s) and is discharged as to such violation(s) 

condition.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States Attorney for this 

district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, 

costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid.

Defendant's Social Security No. 9023

Defendant's Date of Birth: 1965

Defendant's Residence Address:

Mobile, AL

__________________________

Defendant's Mailing Address:

___________________________

___________________________

July 1, 2015

Date of Imposition of Judgment

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

July 10, 2015

Date

X

Case 1:12-cr-00166-CG-C Document 164 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 2
Judgment 2

AO 245D (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations: Sheet 2 - Imprisonment

Defendant: RODNEY EUGENE HILL

Case Number: 1:12-CR-00166-002

IMPRISONMENT

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be 

imprisoned for a total term of EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS.

The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons: 

The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district:

at .m. on .

as notified by the United States Marshal.

The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau 

of Prisons:

before 2 p.m. on .

as notified by the United States Marshal.

as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office.

RETURN

I have executed this judgment as follows:

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

Defendant delivered on to at __________________

with a certified copy of this judgment.

 UNITED STATES MARSHAL 

By _________________________________

 Deputy U.S. Marshal

X

Case 1:12-cr-00166-CG-C Document 164 Filed 07/10/15 Page 2 of 2