U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-KSB

(Mark One)
[X]       ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
          OF 1934

                    For Fiscal Year Ended: December 31, 2001

                                       OR

[ ]       TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
          EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

          For the transition period from               to
                                        --------------    ---------------------

         Commission file number                  000-26751
                               ------------------------------------------------

                               CyPost Corporation
         ---------------------------------------------------------------
        (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

           Delaware                                        98-0178674
-------------------------------                        -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of                          (IRS Employer
 incorporation or organization)                        Identification No.)

    900-1281 West Georgia St.
    Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada                      V6E 3J7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (Address of principal executive offices)                (Zip Code)

Issuer's telephone number                   (604) 904-4422
                         ------------------------------------------------------

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:          NONE
                                                     --------------------------

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value
                                                         $.001 per share
                                                     ---------------------------


<PAGE>
     Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]

     Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item
405 of Regulation SB is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ ]

     State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $3,706,386

     State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity
held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common
equity was sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such common equity, as
of a specified date within the past 60 days. (See definition of affiliate in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) $2,087,057 as of March 5, 2002.

     Note: If determining whether a person is an affiliate will involve an
unreasonable effort and expense, the issuer may calculate the aggregate market
value of the common equity held by non-affiliates on the basis of reasonable
assumptions, if the assumptions are stated.

      ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS

     Indicate by check mark whether the issuer has filed all documents and
reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
after the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes [ ]
No [ ]

                    APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS

     State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 23,189,525 as of March 5,
2002.

                       DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

     If the following documents are incorporated by reference, briefly describe
them and identify the part of the Form 10-KSB (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into
which the document is incorporated: (1) any annual report to security holders;
(2) any proxy or information statement; and (3) any prospectus filed pursuant to
Rule 424(b) or (c) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"). The listed
documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual
report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1990).

     No documents are incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form
10-KSB.

     Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes [ ]; No [X]


<PAGE>
                               CYPOST CORPORATION

                          ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB
                      For the Year Ended December 31, 2001

Item Number  Caption                                                        Page
-----------  -------                                                        ----
PART I

1.           Description of Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5

2.           Description of Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  22

3.           Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  25

4.           Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders . . . . . .  31

PART II

5.           Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder
             Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  31

6.           Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
             Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  34

7.           Financial Statements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  41

8.           Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on
             Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  41

PART III

9.           Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control
             Persons; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange
             Act . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  41

10.          Executive Compensation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  43

11.          Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
             Management. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  45

12.          Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. . . . . . . . .  46

PART IV

13.          Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  48

SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  49

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-1


<PAGE>
     Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB that are
not related to historical results, including, without limitation, statements
regarding the issuer's business strategy and objectives, future financial
position and expectations about future operations, are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"), and involve risks and uncertainties. Although the Company
believes that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are
based are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such assumptions will prove
to be accurate and actual results could differ materially from those discussed
in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to
such differences include, but are not limited to, regulatory policies,
competition from other similar businesses, and market and general economic
factors. All forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form
10-KSB are qualified in their entirety by this statement.

                                     PART I

Item 1.  Description of Business

     General

     CyPost Corporation ("CyPost") is engaged in the business of providing
Internet connection and related services (the "ISP Services") for business and
personal use. See "ISP Business" below. Previously, the Company was also
involved in developing certain software products using encryption components to
enhance user security and convenience for communication across digital networks,
and in securing local data storage equipment (the "Software Products"), which
activities the Company no longer pursues. See "Software Products Business"
below. As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, the term "Company" refers
to CyPost and its consolidated subsidiaries.

     CyPost was incorporated on September 5, 1997, under the laws of the State
of Delaware. The original name of CyPost was "ePost Corporation", which name was
changed shortly after incorporation to CyPost Corporation.

     The Company was a development stage company until the first quarter of
1999, when it began to offer the first of its Navaho brand Software Products and
broaden its strategic focus through the acquisition of six Internet service
providers (collectively, "ISPs" or individually, an "ISP"). Currently, providing
ISP Services is the focus of the Company's business. The Company derives
virtually all of its revenues from its ISP Services. No single customer accounts
for a significant portion of the Company's revenue. The Company's business
operations are presently conducted in Canada and the United States. Dollar
values in this Report are expressed in U.S. Dollars, unless indicated otherwise.
On December 31, 2001, one Canadian Dollar ("CDN") was worth $.62870 U.S.
Dollars.


                                        5
<PAGE>
     The Company's principal executive offices are located at 900-1281 West
Georgia Street Vancouver, British Columbia, V6E 3J7, Canada. The Company's
telephone number is (604) 904-4422, and its website is www.cypost.com.

     ISP Business

         Overview

     The Company offers a full range of consumer Internet access services and a
broad selection of business services, both of which are offered nationwide in
the United States and Canada.. The Company's services are tailored to the
specific demands of both its business and residential customers and include
connectivity, server co-locations, domain name registration, e-mail (list
servers for corporate e-mailing), hosting other parties' websites ("Web
hosting"), high-speed Internet access and other value-added services, including
customer care available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year. Over
time, these functions may be expanded to include additional privacy and
protection solutions such as managed anti-virus, firewall, secure connections
from personal computers to corporate networks (Virtual Private Network ("VPN")),
intrusion detection and filtering services.

     The Company's ISP business focuses on a niche market of small to
medium-sized businesses and residential customers primarily in second and third
tier markets, rather than larger businesses. The Company believes that it
provides critically important high levels of customer service, managed
networking, Web hosting and other technical support issues that are key concerns
for this market.

     Through a vendor agreement with WorldCom Canada Ltd. ("WorldCom"),
successor in interest to UUNet Canada, Inc. , the Company provides Internet
access services to approximately 100 communities in Canada, in which
approximately 95% of the Canadian population resides. The Company through a
vendor agreement with Dialup USA Inc. ("Dialup") provides Internet access
services nationwide across 50 states in the U.S. As of December 31, 2001, the
Company had approximately 17,600 business and residential ISP customers.

     At present, most of the revenue from ISP Services can be attributed to
connectivity, although the Company's network of ISP Services is moving towards
focusing on Web hosting, server co-location, and domain name registration,
anticipating a strong hold over connectivity by the larger ISPs in a few years'
time. The Company believes that many large and medium size businesses have
already established a Web presence on the Internet, but that many small
companies and residential customers in second and third tier markets have yet to
make this move. As a result, the Company intends to focus its marketing efforts
on this segment of the business community as well as second and third tier
markets across the US and Canada by offering services at a competitive price
point, and by providing tools that will enable customers to build a Web presence
with minimal cost or expertise.


                                        6
<PAGE>
     While the Internet is growing at an exponential rate, the managed security
service market is currently in its infancy. The Company plans to offer certain
managed security services including anti-virus detection systems, setting up and
monitoring firewalls, developing VPNs and providing intrusion detection
services. The Company will continue to explore additional opportunities to
expand into the managed security service market in order to provide greater
value-added services to its ISP customers. The Company will require third-party
financing in order to expand into the managed security service market. There can
be no guaranty that such financing will be available or, if it is available,
that it will be on terms acceptable to the Company. See "Risk Factors -
Significant Capital Investment" below, and Part II, Item 6, "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations".

     The Company's ISP business began in mid-1999 with the acquisition of the
first two of six ISP providers acquired by the Company. The CyPost Network of
Service Providers consists of (i) the following wholly-owned subsidiaries:
NetRover Inc. ("NetRover") and NetRover Office Inc. ("NetRover Office"), both of
which are located in Toronto; and Hermes Net Solutions Inc. ("Hermes") and
Intouch Internet Inc. ("Intouch"), both of which are located in Vancouver, and
(ii) the following DBAs: Connect Northwest Internet Services ("CNW") in Mount
Vernon and Seattle, Washington; and Internet Arena ("Internet Arena") in
Portland, Oregon. See "CyPost Network of Service Providers" below. Despite the
fact that each of the Company's ISP businesses operates under its own trade
name, most of the customer care, network operations and administration functions
have now been centralized. See "Consolidation of ISP Operations" below. This has
given the Company's ISP businesses the ability to enjoy the benefits of
promoting themselves as regional providers, while obtaining the economic
benefits of centralized network operations, technical support and
administration.

     Industry Background

         Growth of the Internet and Electronic Commerce

     The Internet is a collection of computer networks that links millions of
public and private computers to form the largest computer network in the world,
the Worldwide Web (the "Web"). It has become an important global communications
medium, enabling millions of people to obtain and share information and conduct
business electronically, and is a critical tool for information and
communications for many users. The Internet has grown rapidly in recent years,
both in the number of Web users and websites. Many factors are driving the
growth in the number of Web users and websites, including the large and growing
number of personal computers, advances in the performance and speed of personal
computers and modems, easier access to the Internet and the increasing
importance of the Internet for communications, information and commerce. For
many businesses, the Internet has created a new communications and sales channel
enabling large numbers of geographically dispersed organizations and consumers
to be reached quickly and cost-effectively.


                                        7
<PAGE>
         Evolution of the Internet Services Market

     Today, the Internet services market consists primarily of Internet access.
Access services include dial-up and high-speed Digital Subscribe Lines ("DSL")
access for individuals and small businesses and high-speed dedicated access
primarily for larger organizations. The rapid development and growth of the
Internet have resulted in a highly fragmented industry, consisting of more than
5,000 ISPs in the U.S. and Canada, most of which operate as small, local
businesses. The Internet services industry is expected to undergo substantial
consolidation, especially among mid-sized ISPs, over the next few years.

     ISPs vary widely in geographic coverage, customer focus and the nature and
quality of services provided to subscribers. Few ISPs offer nationwide coverage,
have a brand name with nationwide recognition or can grow significantly without
additional investment in infrastructure. ISPs may concentrate on specific types
of customers that differ from the target markets of other ISPs. Services offered
by ISPs can range from simple dial-up access to highly organized, personalized
access coupled with value-added services. The Company believes that consumers
generally focus on speed and reliability of access, ease of use, customer
service and price, as they evaluate ISPs. In addition, the Company believes many
business customers want all their Internet-based requirements, such as Internet
access, Web hosting and electronic commerce applications, met by a single
provider.

     Internet operations, including Web hosting, domain name registration and
electronic commerce, are increasingly becoming critical to businesses. However,
many businesses lack the resources and expertise to develop, maintain and
enhance, on a cost-effective basis, successful Internet operations. As a result,
businesses increasingly use outside companies to enhance website reliability and
performance, provide continuous operation of their Internet-based functions and
reduce operating expenses. By outsourcing these services, companies can focus on
their business rather than using their resources to support Internet operations.

     There is increasing demand for ISPs to offer electronic commerce or Web
hosting services that businesses can establish quickly and easily. An increasing
number of ISPs supplement their basic Internet access services with a variety of
commercial services that facilitate electronic commerce, such as Web hosting,
co-location, domain name registration and other value-added services. These
services expand an ISP's potential revenue sources from basic monthly access
fees to other fees such as set-up and maintenance charges. In addition, some
larger and more sophisticated ISPs market other Internet-based services, such as
paging, long-distance and cellular telephone services, to both consumers and
business customers.


                                        8
<PAGE>
          The Company's ISP Solutions

     The Company offers a full range of consumer Internet access services and a
broad selection of business services, both of which are offered nationwide in
the United States and Canada, at competitive prices. The Company believes that
its services provide customers with the following benefits:

     Fast and Reliable Quality Service. The Company's systems and network
infrastructure are designed to provide consumer and business customers with fast
and reliable quality service through its state-of-the-art equipment, its network
operations center that is monitored on a 24 hours a day, seven days a week basis
by its engineers and third-party network providers. In addition, the Company
offers bilingual customer support in English and French, for its French-speaking
customers, and additional online customer support at www.helptek.net.

     Cost-Effective Access. The Company offers high quality Internet
connectivity and enhanced business services at price points that are generally
lower than those charged by other ISPs with Canadian national coverage. The
Company offers pre-bundled access services packages under monthly or prepaid
plans.

     Nationwide U.S. and Canadian Network Coverage. Through a vendor agreement
with Dialup USA Inc. ("Dialup"), the Company provides Internet access services
nationwide across 50 states in the US. Through a vendor agreement with WorldCom,
the Company provides Internet access services to approximately 100 communities
in Canada, in which approximately 95% of the Canadian population resides. See
"Dependence on Key Suppliers" below. The Company has additional
telecommunications agreements with other vendors in Canada and the Pacific
Northwest.

     Summary of ISP Services Offered

          Narrowband Access

     The Company offers a range of narrowband (low-speed) access including
dial-up, and dedicated Integration Services Digital Network ("ISDN") services,
to both residential and business customers. These services are offered in
various competitively priced plans designed to meet the needs of customers. The
price plans for all Internet services vary and are subject to change.

     The price plans for the Company's narrowband Internet service vary
depending on the region and are subject to change. The Company offers a variety
of plans which include a fixed number of hours to unlimited plans.

     o    Fixed hourly plans start at $10.00 and unlimited dial-up plans range
          from $14.00 to $24.00 per month.


                                        9
<PAGE>
     The Company's principal price plan for dedicated ISDN for corporate
customers is currently as follows:

     o    $199 per month for dedicated ISDN (64 kilobytes) or $330 for dedicated
          ISDN (128 kilobytes), plus a one time setup fee of $100

          Broadband Access

     Broadband access consists of high-speed, high-capacity access services such
as DSL. Many of the Company's customers have upgraded from the dial-up service,
and the Company continues to expand its broadband service so that all dial-up
customers will have the option to upgrade to a broadband service rather than use
a competing ISP elsewhere. These services are currently available through CNW,
Internet Arena and Hermes.

     The Company's principal price plan for dedicated high-speed DSL service for
residential customers is currently as follows:

     o    $25 per month for dedicated DSL (1.5 Mbps) with one e-mail account, 20
          megabytes of storage space, and 5 gigabytes of transfer

     The Company's principal price plan for dedicated high-speed Asymmetric
Digital Subscribe Line ("ADSL") service for corporate customers is currently as
follows:

     o    $66 per month plus a one time setup fee of $44, for dedicated ADSL
          (1.5 Mbps) with 10 e-mail accounts, 20 Megabytes of storage space, and
          5 Gigabytes of transfer

     o    $99 per month plus a one time setup fee of $56, for dedicated ADSL
          (2.5 Mbps) with 25 e-mail accounts, 20 Megabytes of storage space, and
          10 Gigabytes of transfer

     o    $130 per month plus a one time setup fee of $70, for dedicated ADSL
          (4.0 Mbps) with 50 e-mail accounts, 20 Megabytes of storage space, and
          15 Gigabytes of transfer

          E-Mail

     The Company offers a range of basic and enhanced e-mail services to
individuals and businesses. Often, the decision is made to outsource services to
a provider in order to avoid the financial cost, time and expertise requirements
of maintaining e-mail services internally. While the geographic coverage of the
Company's e-mail services customer base is worldwide, the Company targets
prospective customers in Canada and the U.S.


                                       10
<PAGE>
          Customer Security

     The Company offers password protected access to all of its customers. The
Company also offers some e-mail filtering services to limit computer viruses
from being delivered to mailboxes. In addition, the Company employs monitoring
mechanisms to block e-mail from companies that are known to generate junk
e-mail, commonly known as "spam".

          Web Hosting

     The Company offers a range of basic and enhanced Web hosting services to
individuals and businesses wishing to place their own website on the Internet.
Often the decision is made to outsource services to a provider in order to avoid
the financial cost, time and expertise requirements of self-hosting the website
and obtaining enhanced services internally. While the geographic coverage of the
market for Web hosting services is worldwide, the Company targets prospective
customers in Canada and the U.S.

     Web hosting can be differentiated into shared or dedicated hosting, both of
which the Company offers. Shared hosting involves multiple customers who have
their websites hosted on a shared computer server. Dedicated server hosting is
available to customers that prefer not to host their websites on a shared
server. Dedicated servers provide significantly more server and network
resources than those available from a shared server and give customers the
ability to run complex, high volume or high bandwidth websites and applications.
The Company offers a number of dedicated server options at various prices
depending upon the specific hardware configuration, level of service and data
transfer rates required by the customer. The Company hosts customer websites and
indirectly provides access to the Internet through its Network of Service
Providers.

     The Company's principal price plans for Web hosting are currently as
follows:

     o    WebHost Classic $6.95 per month includes 5 megabytes of storage space,
          website statistics and personalized e-mail

     o    WebHost Bronze $19.95 per month includes 10 megabytes of storage
          space, 1000 megabytes of data transfer, detailed website statistics
          and personalized e-mails

     o    WebHost Silver $29.95 per month includes 20 megabytes of storage
          space, 1500 megabytes of data transfer, detailed website statistics
          and personalized e-mails

     o    WebHost Gold $34.95 per month includes 40 megabytes of storage space,
          2000 megabytes of data transfer, detailed website statistics and
          personalized e-mails


                                       11
<PAGE>
          Server Co-Location

     The Company provides server co-location services, whereby a customer gains
access to the Company's Internet support and maintenance services, high-speed
Internet connections, security systems and appropriate physical environment for
the server (e.g., static free, air-conditioned environments).

     The Company's pricing policy for this service varies and is largely
dependent on the customer's individual requirements.

          Customer Care

     A critical factor in selecting an ISP is quality and availability of
technical support and customer care. With increasing complexity of today's
technology, an effective ISP must offer customers a clearly defined means of
reporting and resolving unexpected problems.

     The Company is committed to customer service and support demonstrated by
its outstanding customer service record, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365
days a year coverage, and local service and support. The Company's Network
Operations Centers and technical support staff offer customers individualized
support for their business-critical Internet solutions and provide network
monitoring 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year, in both English
and French, for the Company's French-speaking customers, and additional online
customer support at www.helptek.net.

     The Company's Customer Care Center is the communications hub of the
Company's network. The Customer Care Center is comprised of monitoring
engineers, call analysts, Internet systems engineers, key senior technical
agents and billing services staff.

     The Company has established detailed protocols to effectively assess and
route customer communications, service or trouble requests and event
notification or alerts. In this way, the Company can ensure that its clients are
operating at peak performance at all hours of the day and night.

          Network Operations Centers

     The Company has two network operation centers, located in Etobicoke
(suburban Toronto), Ontario and Seattle, Washington. These operation centers
monitor network traffic, quality of services and security issues, as well as the
performance of the equipment located at each of its physical locations, to
ensure reliable service. The operation centers are monitored on a 24 hours a
day, seven days a week, 365 days a year basis, and maintain responsibility for
communications between their internal departments (customer care) as well as
with external providers of services.


                                       12
<PAGE>
          High-Quality Data Centers

     The Company operates all of its core servers from four Internet Data
Centers. With locations in both Canada and the U.S., these data centers provide
the physical environment necessary to keep servers up and running 24 hours a
day, seven days a week, 365 days a year.

     The Toronto data center includes HVAC temperature systems with separate
cooling zones, physical security features, including state of the art smoke
detection and fire suppression systems, motion sensors and 24 hours a day, seven
days a week and 365 days secure access, as well as video camera surveillance.
This facility delivers high levels of reliability through redundant sub-systems
such as on-site power with multiple backup generators.

             Global Backbone, High Performance Network Architecture

     The Company invests significant resources in developing a scalable network
infrastructure. The Company's strategy is to outsource the process of building a
scalable national or regional dial-up network. This eliminates the need for the
Company to purchase equipment, negotiate leases throughout Canada and the U.S.
to house the equipment, and provide Internet connectivity to all these
locations. By outsourcing its network and dial-up infrastructure, the Company
also has the ability to offer its services in areas where network costs would be
prohibitive. Because it is not committed to leasing or building its own network,
the Company can take advantage of the market opportunities that develop due to
technological advances or regulatory changes. In addition, in some cases the
Company has negotiated agreements with its telecommunication suppliers that are
priced on a per customer basis, including its principal telecommunications
agreements with WorldCom in Canada and Dialup in the U.S. As a result, the
Company is only billed for the clients that actually use these services. In such
cases, the Company's telecommunication costs only increase if the customer base
increases. Conversely, if the customer base decreases, the Company's
telecommunications costs decrease. Thus, the Company does not need to build its
own network and work to fill any spare capacity that may exist. The Company has
entered into agreements with telecommunications network suppliers for network
capacity. These agreements are for fixed terms from one to five years.

     The Company plans to modify its network over time to enhance its
performance, provide access demanded by the market and allow it to serve a
larger subscriber base. The Company's goal is to minimize both network costs and
exposure to technological obsolescence of equipment.

     Wherever feasible, the Company makes its network fault tolerant with
redundant equipment. Such actions include standby equipment to handle additional
capacity if a server has to be replaced for reasons such as malfunction of a
hard drive or software. The redundancy allows for operations to continue as
efficiently as possible, while the failure can be isolated to a particular piece


                                       13
<PAGE>
of equipment. In most cases, the availability of redundancy of equipment or
excess capacity allows for the alternative processing of data until the
defective equipment or software can be replaced or repaired. These measures,
along with continuous monitoring, are designed to minimize network downtime and
provide early identification of potential sources of failure. The Company
believes that it will require third-party financing to acquire the additional
equipment required to further enhance the reliability of its network. There can
be no guarantee that such financing will be available or, if available, it will
be available on terms acceptable to the Company. See "Risk Factors - Significant
Capital Investment" below.

          Dependence on Key Suppliers

     On November 8, 2001, the Company entered into an Amendment agreement with
WorldCom, which provides network infrastructure for some of the Company's ISP
Services operations. The term of the agreement is two years, commencing on May
1, 2001 and terminating on April 30, 2003 with a minimum payment of $90,000 CDN
per month.

          Marketing

     The Company is actively seeking to market broadly its ISP Services and has
taken a number of steps in that direction, including the use of a variety of
print and communications media. The Company intends to market its services to
resellers and wholesalers, as well as enter into strategic partnerships and
joint ventures.

          Consolidation of ISP Services Operations

     During 2001, the Company continued to streamline and consolidate its ISP
Services operations to enhance efficiency and reduce operating expenses. The
Company has embarked on a program to centralize ISP Services to the greatest
extent possible, as follows:

     o Customer Support. In early 2001, the Company began consolidating all
     aspects of customer support (including end user technical issues) for its
     Oregon ISP customers into the Chatham, Ontario facility. The Washington
     state ISP customer support is handled in the Mt. Vernon office.

     o Billing and Collections. In early 2001 the billing and collections for
     the Oregon ISP customers were consolidated into the Chatham facility,
     billing and collections for the Washington ISP Services customers is
     expected to be consolidated in Q2 2002.


                                       14
<PAGE>
     The Company is also consolidating Web hosting and dedicated services into
Toronto, a process which began in late-2000 and is expected to be completed by
Q2 -2002. Other ISP Services such as e-mail and user authentication (i.e.,
customer security) will continue to be handled from regional data centers.
Beginning in early 2001, all new Web hosting customers, wherever located, were
hosted from Toronto. The Company is also considering implementing other
consolidated services to achieve greater efficiency and cost savings.

          Network of Service Providers

     The Company's Network of Service Providers consists of the following
entities:

     NetRover/NetRover Office. NetRover, based in Toronto, Etobicoke (suburban
Toronto) and Chatham, Ontario, is the largest of the Company's ISP Services
entities, currently serving approximately 12,700 residential and small business
customers throughout Canada. NetRover offers inexpensive packages focusing on
Web hosting and dial-up connections, as well as some server co-location.

     NetRover currently offers dial-up service with the network infrastructure
provided through WorldCom and has dial-up availability across Canada. With this
national reach, the Company intends to use the NetRover trade name for
expansion. The Chatham facility is the backbone of the Company's customer
support and billing functions.

     Hermes. Based in Vancouver, British Columbia, Hermes serves approximately
450 customers in British Columbia. Hermes offers a range of services including
connectivity (including ADSL), server co-location, Web hosting and e-mail
services.

     Intouch. Based in Vancouver, British Columbia, Intouch serves approximately
800 residential and small office/home office customers in British Columbia.
Intouch has a "community" feel, and is primarily focused on dial-up
connectivity, basic Web hosting, high-speed DSL and e-mail services.

     Internet Arena. Based in Portland, Oregon, Internet Arena serves
approximately 840 primarily residential and small office/home office customers
in Oregon. Internet Arena offers a similar range of services to Intouch.

     CNW. Based in Mt. Vernon and Seattle, Washington, CNW serves approximately
2800 business and residential customers in Washington. More focused on custom
work, CNW's experience includes ethical hacking and other security monitoring.
CNW also offers dial-up, DSL connectivity and Web hosting for its customers.

     Software Products Business

     Prior to January 1, 2001 the Company had developed its Navaho brand
software products, which utilized encryption for email and data files. The
Company discontinued software development as of end of 2000 and does not intend
to recommence further development until appropriate financing is available to do
so.


                                       15
<PAGE>
     Competition

     The market for providing Internet access services is extremely competitive
and highly fragmented. As there are no significant barriers to entry, the
Company expects that competition will continue to intensify. Many of the
Company's ISP competitors in connectivity, wholesale services and value-added
services include large companies that have substantially greater market
presence, financial, technical, marketing and other resources than the Company.

     The Company competes directly or indirectly with the following types of
companies:

     o    established online services, such as Bell Sympatico, Sprint Canada and
          Look Communication in Canada

     o    America Online, the Microsoft Network, Earthlink and Prodigy in the US

     o    local, regional and national ISPs

     o    national telecommunications companies, such as AT&T and Verizon

     o    regional Bell operating companies

     o    online cable services in Canada and the U.S.

     The Company believes that the primary competitive factors determining
success as an ISP are:

     o    a reputation for reliability and high-quality service

     o    effective customer support

     o    access speed

     o    pricing

     o    scope of geographic coverage

     The Company believes that it competes favorably based on these factors,
particularly due to:


                                       16
<PAGE>
     o    its emphasis on providing fast and reliable, high quality services and
          superior customer service and support

     o    its policy of pricing services at prices lower than or competitive to
          those of other national ISPs

     o    its policy to focus on second- and third-tier markets where
          competition from larger ISPs is reduced

     o    its goal to establish a niche market in response to the growing
          concerns for privacy and protection, rather than establishing itself
          as a competitor of the large ISPs, including telecommunication and
          cable companies

     Competition in the future is likely to increase and the Company believes
this will happen as diversified telecommunications and media companies acquire
ISPs, and as ISPs consolidate into larger, more competitive entities.

     Moreover, competitors may bundle security services and products with
Internet connectivity services, potentially placing the Company at a significant
competitive disadvantage. In addition, competitors may charge less than the
Company does for Internet services, forcing the Company to reduce and/or
preventing the Company from raising its fees. In such event, future revenue
growth and earnings could suffer. The Company will attempt to compete against
such companies by offering various value-added services, such as managed
security services from partners to its ISP customers. While other larger ISPs
offer some security solutions (many are offering client-end filtering as an
example), the Company is reviewing the entire spectrum of services available
in-house or through partnerships, to ensure that the Company has a thorough
selection of security options to utilize and offer its customers.

     Government Regulation

     Internet access and online services are not subject to direct regulation in
Canada and the U.S. However, changes in the laws and regulations relating to the
telecommunications and media industry could impact the Company's business. For
example, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission could begin to regulate the
Internet and online services industry.

The Company is unable to predict the impact such regulation in either Canada or
the U.S. would have on the Company's business, financial condition and results
of operations.

     In addition, from time to time, legislative and regulatory proposals from
various international bodies and foreign and domestic governments in the areas
of telecommunications regulation, particularly related to the infrastructures on
which the Internet rests, access charges, encryption standards and related
export controls, content regulation, consumer protection, advertising,


                                       17
<PAGE>
intellectual property, privacy, electronic commerce, and taxation, tariff and
other trade barriers, among others, have been adopted or are under
consideration. The Company is unable to predict which, if any, of the proposals
under consideration may be adopted and, with respect to proposals that have been
or will be adopted, whether they will have a beneficial or an adverse effect on
the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
Similarly, the Company is unable to predict the effect on the Company from the
potential future application of various domestic and foreign laws governing
content, export restrictions, privacy, consumer protection, export controls on
encryption technology, tariffs and other trade barriers, intellectual property
and taxes.

     Proprietary Rights

     The Company has registered the NetRover trade name in Canada, but has not
registered that name in the U.S. since, until recently, NetRover ISP Services
have been offered exclusively in Canada. The Company has applied for
registration in the U.S. of the CyPost trade name. The Company has not
registered the Hermes or Intouch trade names in either Canada or the U.S. While
the Company believes trade name identification is important to the Company's ISP
Services business, the Company does not believe that any one trade name is
essential to the success of the Company's operations.

     The Company has not registered the Navaho brand name and is unlikely to do
so. If the Company pursues Software Products development again in the future, it
is likely to do so under a different brand name.

     Employees

     At December 31, 2001, the Company had 35 full-time employees, of whom 8 are
management, 3 are marketing, and 24 are administration and 14 were considered to
be either temporary or part-time employees of whom all are administration. None
of the Company's employees was subject to collective bargaining agreements at
year-end.

     Risk Factors

     In addition to other information in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, you
should consider the following important factors in evaluating the Company and
its business. These factors may have a significant impact on our business,
financial condition or results of operations. We are involved in litigation,
which, if not resolved favorably, would significantly increase our losses. The
Company is currently involved in the following two lawsuits: Tami Hellen Allan,
and Berry Litigation. If we do not prevail in these lawsuits, our losses could
significantly increase. See Item 3 "Legal Proceedings".


                                       18
<PAGE>
          Early-Stage Company

     We were incorporated on September 5, 1997. From 1997 through the first
quarter of 1999, we focused on developing our Software Products business.
Thereafter, we focused on our ISP Services business as we began to acquire our
ISP operating businesses. It is the ISP Services business on which we focus
presently. Our limited operating history makes an evaluation of our business and
prospects very difficult, and our business strategy and mix is still evolving.
Our ability to operate profitably is unproven and uncertain. You must consider
our business and prospects in light of the risks and difficulties we encounter
as an early stage company in the new and rapidly evolving market of the
Internet, and the rapidly changing environment of software development. These
risks and difficulties include, but are not limited to:

     o    a complex and unproven business system

     o    lack of sufficient customers, orders, net sales or cash flow

     o    difficulties in managing rapid growth in personnel and operations

     o    high capital expenditures associated with our business systems and
          technologies

     o    lack of widespread acceptance of the Internet as a means of gathering
          and exchanging information and purchasing products

     We cannot be certain that our business strategy will be successful or that
we will successfully address these risks. Our failure to address any of the
risks described above could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.

          Overall Industry Risks

     Our business and prospects must be considered in light of the risks,
expenses and difficulties encountered by companies in the new and rapidly
evolving market for dial-up, ISDN, DSL connectivity services, server
co-location, Web hosting and e-mail services. To address these risks, we must
market our services and build our trade names effectively, provide scalable,
reliable and cost-effective services, continue to grow our infrastructure to
accommodate additional customers and increased use of our network bandwidth,
expand our channels of distribution, continue to respond to competitive
developments and retain and motivate qualified personnel.

     Dependence Upon the Internet and Internet Infrastructure Development

     Our success depends largely upon continued growth in the use of the
Internet and increased demand for our ISP Services. Critical issues concerning
the commercial use of the Internet, including security, reliability, cost, ease
of access, quality of service and necessary increases in bandwidth availability,


                                       19
<PAGE>
remain unresolved and are likely to affect the development of the market for our
services. The adoption of the Internet for information retrieval and exchange,
commerce and communications, particularly by those enterprises that have
historically relied upon alternative means of information gathering, commerce
and communications, generally will require the acceptance of a new medium of
conducting business and exchanging information. Demand and market acceptance of
the Internet are subject to a high level of uncertainty and depend upon a number
of factors, including growth in consumer access to and acceptance of new
interactive technologies, the development of technologies that facilitate
interactive communication between organizations and targeted audiences and
increases in the speed of user access. If the Internet, as a commercial or
business medium, fails to develop further or develops more slowly than expected,
our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially
adversely affected.

          Intense Competition From More Traditional ISPs

     The Internet and e-commerce market is extremely competitive. Our
competition is comprised of local, regional, national and international
companies. Many of our existing and potential competitors are larger and have
substantially greater resources than we do. We expect this competition in the
Internet and e-commerce markets to intensify as our competitors offer more
competitive services. The number and nature of competitors and the amount of
competition we will experience will vary by market area. The principal
competitive factors that affect our business are breadth of product selection,
quality, service, price and customer loyalty. If we fail to effectively compete
in any one of these areas, we may lose existing and potential customers, which
would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.

          Complex Business System, and Operational Difficulties

     Our business systems and technologies are based on the complex integration
of numerous software and hardware subsystems that utilize advanced algorithms to
manage the entire process from the receipt and processing of orders and services
at our customer service and administration centers. We have, from time to time,
experienced operational "bugs" in our systems and technologies, which have
resulted in order and service errors and interruptions. Operational difficulties
may arise from one or more factors including electro-mechanical equipment
failures, computer server or system failures, network outages, software
performance problems or power failures. We expect operational difficulties to
continue to occur from time to time, and it is possible that our operations
could be adversely affected. Computer viruses, electronic break-ins or other
similar disruptive problems could also adversely affect our website. In
addition, fires, floods, earthquakes, power losses, telecommunications failures,
break-ins and similar events could damage our systems or cause them to fail
completely. For instance, a fire on January 31, 2000, at our Etobicoke (suburban
Toronto), Ontario facility caused service interruption for 36 hours. The
efficient operation of our business systems is critical to consumer acceptance
of our services. If we are unable to meet customer demand or service
expectations as a result of operational issues, we may be unable to develop
sustainable, customer relationships, which could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


                                       20
<PAGE>
         Dependence on Telecommunication Providers

     Our success also depends upon the capacity, scalability, reliability and
security of our network infrastructure, including the telecommunications
capacity leased from WorldCom and other telecommunications network suppliers. We
depend on such companies to maintain the operational integrity of their own
telecommunications networks. Therefore, our operating results depend, in part,
upon the pricing and availability of telecommunications network capacity from a
limited number of providers in a consolidated market. A material increase in
pricing or decrease in telecommunications capacity available to us could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.

          Significant Capital Investment

     We require substantial amounts of working capital to further build, equip
and market certain aspects of our ISP Services in the markets in which we seek
to operate. Our competitors have developed or may develop equipment and systems
that are more highly automated or less capital-intensive than ours. This could
enable them to commence operations in a particular geographic market before we
are able to do so, which could harm our competitive position. In addition,
because of the substantial capital costs associated with the development of our
ISP business, we may be unable to achieve profitability or reduce our operating
losses if we do not process sufficient order volumes or significantly expand our
customer base.

     As the total number of our ISP customers increases, and their usage of
bandwidth increases, we will need to make additional investments in our
infrastructure to maintain adequate service, the availability of which may be
limited or the cost of which may be significant. Additional network capacity may
not be available from third-party suppliers as we need it, and, as a result, our
ISP network may not be able to achieve or maintain a sufficiently high capacity
of service, especially if the usage of our subscribers increases. Our failure to
achieve or maintain high-capacity data transmission could significantly reduce
consumer demand for our services and have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition. To accommodate a higher
degree of scalability from the present infrastructure, we may have to increase
spending on capital assets, such as upgrading and partially replacing existing
capital assets and increasing bandwidth.

     At present, we lack the capital to pursue our Software Products business.
Any continued development of Software Products would require significant amounts
of capital from third parties. We do not have any agreements for that funding
and we cannot say if that funding will be available in the future.


                                       21
<PAGE>
     The rate at which our capital is utilized is affected by the pace of our
expansion. Since our inception, we have experienced negative cash flow from
operations. In the past, we have funded our operating losses and capital
expenditures borrowings of debt and convertible debt from private sources. We
continue to evaluate alternative means of financing to meet our needs on terms
that are attractive to us. We currently anticipate that our available funds will
be sufficient to meet our anticipated needs for working capital and capital
expenditures with respect to our existing ISP Services business for at least the
next 12 months. We must either raise additional funds to support aspects of our
business for 2002 or we will be forced to curtail certain aspects of our
business operations, particularly in terms of the growth of and further
enhancements to our ISP Services business, or recommencing research and
development of Software Products. We need a minimum of $500,000 and a maximum of
$4,500,000 to support current operations, grow and further enhance our ISP
services business, and a minimum of $250,000 and a maximum of $500,000 to
recommence the research and development of the Software Products. If financing
were made available we would first apply the proceeds to the further enhancement
of our ISP services business. We cannot be certain that additional financing
will be available to us on favorable terms when required, or at all. If we are
unable to obtain sufficient additional capital when needed, we could be forced
to alter our business strategy, delay or abandon some of our expansion plans or
sell assets. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we
raise additional funds through the issuance of equity, equity-linked or debt
securities, those securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior
to those of the rights of our Common Stock and our stockholders may also
experience dilution.

The Loss of the Services of One or More of Our Key Personnel, or our Failure to
Attract, Integrate New Hires and Retain Other Highly Qualified Personnel in the
Future Could Harm our Business

     The loss of the services of one or more of our key personnel could harm our
business. We depend on the continued services and performance of our senior
management and other key personnel. Our future success also depends upon the
continued service of our executive officers and other key personnel. The
competition for talented employees is intense and our ability to attract and
retain key employees is a function of a number of factors, some of which are
beyond our control, such as the value of other opportunities perceived to be
available elsewhere. None of our executive officers or key employees are bound
by an employment agreement and our relationships with these officers and key
employees are at will.

Item 2.  Description of Property

     The Company has entered into a net lease with Mansa Holdings Ltd. in
respect to its office premises located at 900-1281 West Georgia St., Vancouver,
British Columbia for approximately 6500 square feet of office space. The term of
the lease is for 60 months and ends on June 1, 2005. The current monthly net


                                       22
<PAGE>
rent under this lease is $6019 CDN$. The property taxes and operating expenses
are currently estimated at 6437 CDN$ per square feet per month. The lease
contains escalation clauses throughout the term. For the period between June
1,2003 and May 31,2005 the monthly net rent under this lease will be $6566.00
CDN$ per month.

Customer Support and billing Center

On November 2nd, 2000, NetRover Inc. entered into an assignment of a net lease
between H.V.M. Holdings Inc. (Landlord) and Garden Green Realty Inc. (Previous
Tenant) in respect to NetRover's office premises located at 405 Riverview Drive,
Chatham, Ontario for approximately 2100 square feet of office space.  The term
of the lease starts  December 1st , 2000 and ends on May 31st , 2003. The
current monthly net rent under this lease is $ 1420 CDN$. The property taxes and
operating expenses are currently estimated at $1800. CDN$ per month. The lease
contains escalation clauses throughout the term. For the period between May 31st
2001 and May 31, 2002 the monthly net rent under this lease will be $1420 CDN$
per month. For the period between May 31st 2002 and May 31, 2003 the monthly net
rent under this lease will be $1509 CDN$ per month

Administration / Accounting

On  July 1,1995 NetRover Inc. entered into a net lease with The Imperial Life
Assurance Company of Canada in respect to Net rover's office premises located at
93 Skyway Ave., Suite 105, Etobicoke, Ontario for approximately 1783 square feet
of office space. The term of the lease is for 5 years and ended on June 30,
2000.  For the period between July 1, 1998  and June 30, 2000 the monthly net
rent under this lease was $1333 CDN$ per month

On June 13th, 2000, NetRover Inc. amended the net lease with The Imperial Life
Assurance Company of Canada in respect to Net rover's office premises located at
93 Skyway Ave., Suite 106, (previously unit 105) Etobicoke, Ontario for
approximately 1700 square feet of office space. The term of the lease is for 3
years starting July 1,2000 and endings on July 31, 2003. The monthly net rent
throughout the term of the lease is $1435 CDN$. The property taxes and operation
expenses are currently estimated at $1413 CDN$ per month.

Network Operations Center

On January 28th, 2000, the Company entered into a gross lease with 890 West
Pender Ltd. in respect to its office premises located at 890 West Pender Street,
Vancouver, British Columbia for approximately 650 square feet of office space.
The term of the lease is for one year and ended on January 31st, 2001. The
monthly gross rent throughout the term of the lease is $775 CDN$ per month.

     Subsequently, on January 15th, 2002, the Company entered into a Lease
Amendment Agreement with 890 West Pender Ltd. in respect to this location. The


                                       23
<PAGE>
term of the lease is for one year commencing February 1st, 2002 and ending on
January 31st, 2003. The monthly gross rent throughout the term of the lease is
$1087 CDN$ per month. Retail Space (Empty at this time)

     The Company assumed a lease obligation with the former owners of Intouch in
respect to an office located at  3448 Cambie Street, Vancouver, British Columbia
for approximately 825 square feet of office space. The term of the lease ended
on December 31, 2001. The monthly net rent due was$1581 CDN$ per month. The
property taxes and operating expenses are were $964 CDN$ per month. This lease
was not renewed.

Network Operations Center

     The Company has entered into an assignment of a lease with American
Property Management in respect to two offices located at 1016 & 1008 SW Taylor
Street, Portland, Oregon comprising approximately 1902  and  457 square feet of
space, respectively. The term of the lease ends January 31, 2002. The monthly
net rent is $2801 US$ per month. The additional expenses are currently estimated
at $284 US$ per month. (Internet access in the amount of  $232 per month and
water usage in the amount of $52. per month.)

     Subsequently, on  February  6th  , 2002, the Company entered into a Lease
Amendment Agreement with American Property Management  in respect to its office
located at 1016 SW Taylor Street, Portland, Oregon. for approximately 1902
square feet of office space. The term of the lease is for one year commencing
February 1st, 2002 and ending on January 31st, 2003. The monthly gross rent
throughout the term of the lease is $2377 US$ per month.  The additional
expenses are currently estimated at $284 US$ per month.  (Internet access in the
amount of  $232 per month and water usage in the amount of  $52 per month).
The Company did not renew the office space located at 1008 SW Taylor Street,
Portland, Oregon, which comprised of 457 square feet.

Sales and Regional customer support

     The Company entered into an Amendment and Novation Agreement dated October
27, 1999 with Timothy B. White Properties and Connect Northwest LLC in respect
to an office located at 117 North First Street, Mount Vernon, Washington. The
lease ends August 31, 2003. The current net rent under the lease is $ 3200 US$
per month. In addition the Company is responsible for 87% of the electrical bill
which are currently estimated at $231 US$ per month. The lease contains
escalation clauses throughout the term. For the period between September 1st,
2000 and August 31st, 2001 the monthly net rent was $3000 US$. For the period
between September 1st, 2001 and August 31st, 2002 the monthly net rent under
this lease will be $3200 US$ per month. For the period between September 1st,
2002 and August 31st,2003 the monthly net rent under this lease will be $3400
US$ per month. The company has the option to renew the lease for 1 additional
term of 5 years.


                                       24
<PAGE>
Network Operations Center

     The Company entered into an Assignment of Lease and Acceptance dated
October 26, 1999 with Sixth & Virginia Properties and Connect Northwest LLC in
respect to an office located at 2001 Sixth Avenue, Suite 705, Seattle for
approximately 210 square feet of office space. The term of the lease ended on
June 30, 2001. The monthly rent was $1299 US$ per month.

     On August 8th, 2001, the Company entered into a Lease Amendment Agreement
with Sixth and Virginia Properties, in respect to this location. The term of the
lease is for three years commencing September 1st, 2001 and ending on August
31st, 2004. The lease contains escalation clauses throughout the term.  For the
period between September 1st , 2001 and August  31st  ,2003 the monthly net rent
under this lease will be $1225 US$ per month. For the period between, and
September 1s t, 2003 to August 31s t, 2004 the monthly net rent under this lease
will be $1287 US$ per month.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

     Canada Post Litigation
     ----------------------

     On June 11, 1999, Canada Post Corporation filed a Statement of Claim in the
Federal Court of Canada (Court File No. T-1022-99) in which it sought injunctive
and unspecified monetary relief for the allegedly "improper" use by the
Company's subsidiary, ePost Innovations, of certain marks and names which
contain the component "post". On October 18, 1999, ePost Innovations filed its
Defense and Counterclaim. In a motion heard November 24, 1999, Canada Post
Corporation challenged certain parts of the Counterclaim and the Federal Court
reserved judgment. On May 25, 1999, ePost Innovations filed a statement of Claim
in the British Columbia Court (Court File No. C992649) seeking a declaration
that the public notice of Canada Post Corporation's adoption and use of
CYBERPOSTE and CYBERPOST on November 18, 1998 and December 9, 1998 respectively,
did not affect the Company's use of CYPOST and ePost Innovations as trademarks
and trade-names prior to said dates. ePost Innovations sought summary judgment
for such a declaration and on September 14, 1999, the BC Court rejected summary
judgment on the basis that no right of the Company was being infringed and that
a trial of the issues was more appropriate. There was no pre-trial discovery
(except to the extent that some was done as part of the summary judgment
application).

     Canada Post was seeking relief in the form of preventing ePost Innovations
from using trademarks, trade names or brand names and did not seek monetary
damages.

     On June 20, 2001 ePost Innovations, Canada Post and the Company entered
into a Settlement and Release Agreement effective as of May 30, 2001 (the
"Settlement Agreement"). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the parties
executed mutual releases and discontinued their respective claims. The release


                                       25
<PAGE>
by Canada Post to ePost Innovations was made subject to the Company and ePost
Innovations ceasing all use of the trade name EPOST within Canada within 90 days
of the effective date of the Settlement Agreement and transferring all right,
title and interest they had with respect to the trade name and trademark EPOST
and any goodwill associated therewith to Canada Post upon execution of the
Settlement Agreement. On August 30, 2001 the Company changed the name of its
subsidiary to NetRoverUSA Online Inc.

The Company has complied with all terms of  the  Settlement  Agreement.

     Berry Litigation
     ----------------

     On March 31, 2000, the Company commenced suit in the Supreme Court of
British Columbia, Action #S001822, Vancouver Registry against Tia Berry (the
"Tia Action"), the wife of Steven Berry ("Berry"), the former President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company. In the Tia Action, the Company claims
$42,516 (CDN) from Tia Berry on account of monies paid to her by the Company
which she was not entitled to receive. Tia Berry has filed a Statement of
Defense in the Tia Action in which she alleges that the payments which she
received from the Company were to reimburse her for business expenses which she
had charged to her credit cards on behalf of Berry. An Examination for Discovery
of Sandra Lynn Warren took place on February 19, 2002 in conjunction with this
action. The Tia Action has not yet been set for trial.

     On April 4, 2000, Berry commenced an action in the Supreme Court of the
State of New York, County of New York (Index No. 601448/2000), against the
Company and Continental Stock Transfer Company ("Continental"), (the "New York
Action"). In the New York Action, Berry claimed damages for alleged conversion,
fraud, breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty all arising from the
alleged wrongful Stop Transfer Order which the Company placed relating to 75,000
shares of the Company's Common Stock registered in Berry's name and the
Company's cancellation of a further 600,000 shares (the "Contingent Shares").
The complaint in the New York Action claims damages in excess of $3,000,000 with
the precise amount to be determined at trial.

     Berry received the 600,000 Contingent Shares upon condition that he would
remain in the Company's employ as Chief Executive Officer for at least two
years. Berry commenced his employment with the Company on January 4, 1999, and
resigned his employment with the Company on January 17, 2000. Following Berry's
resignation, the Company attempted to have a Stop Transfer Order issued with
respect to the 75,000 shares registered in Berry's name and cancel the 600,000
Contingent Shares. The Stop Transfer Order was not effective and Berry
subsequently sold the 75,000 shares.

     On May 19, 2000 CyPost and ePost Innovations commenced suit in the Supreme
Court of British Columbia, Action #S002798, Vancouver Registry, against Berry
and his wife, Tia Berry (the "BC Action"). In the BC Action, the Company seeks
an order directing Berry to return the 600,000 Contingent Shares to the Company
for cancellation for an order entitling the Company to cancel the same on the
basis that Berry did not fulfill the employment conditions which were the
condition precedent to his becoming the beneficial owner of the Contingent
Shares.


                                       26
<PAGE>
     In the BC Action, the Company also claims at least Cdn$800,000 from Berry
on account of breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, breach of statutory duties
and breach of contract arising from Berry's failure to properly carry out his
employment responsibilities. In the BC Action, the Company also claims
Cdn$34,013 from Berry and Tia Berry on account of conspiracy to defraud and
injure the Company and ePost Innovations by causing certain personal expenses to
be paid by the Company rather than by Berry and Tia Berry personally. The
Company also claims punitive and exemplary damages from Berry and Tia Berry in
the BC Action. The trial date has been set for Monday, January 20, 2003.

     On May 25, 2000, the Company moved in the New York Action for an order
dismissing the action against the Company for lack of jurisdiction or, in the
alternative, on the basis of forum non conveniens. On September 5, 2000, the
court dismissed the New York Action on forum non conveniens grounds, subject to
the Company making certain stipulations in the New York Action. Those
stipulations have been made and the appeal period in the New York Action has
expired without Berry or any other party appealing the September 5, 2000 order.

     The issues raised by Berry and the Company in the New York Action will be
litigated in the BC Action together with the further issues raised by the
Company in the BC Action. The Company feels that Berry's claims in the New York
Action were without merit and that the Company will be successful in obtaining
an order declaring that Berry's 600,000 Contingent Shares be cancelled and
further entitling the Company to substantial damages, although no assurance can
be given that this will be the case. The Company will vigorously pursue its
position in all respects.

     On December 21, 2000, Berry and Tia Berry commenced suit in the Supreme
Court of British Columbia, Action #S006790, Vancouver Registry, against CyPost,
ePost Innovations, Kelly Shane Montalban, J. Thomas W. Johnston, Carl Whitehead
and Robert Sendoh (the "Berry Action"). Statements of Defense have been filed on
behalf of the Company and the other defendants.

     The Plaintiffs in the Berry Action allege that the Tia Action, the BC
Action, and the action by Kelly Shane Montalban (Supreme Court of British
Columbia, Action #S002147, Vancouver Registry), against Berry for specific
performance of an option agreement (the "Montalban Action"), collectively,
amount to an abuse of process, malicious prosecution, unlawful interference with
the Plaintiffs' economic rights, or were commenced pursuant to a civil
conspiracy to injure the Plaintiffs.

     In the Berry Action, the Plaintiffs seek a declaration that Berry is
entitled to the 600,000 Contingent Shares and claim unspecified damages which
are estimated at Cdn$2,000,000 based on the Statement of Claim. They also claim
punitive or aggravated damages and costs. The Company believes that the
allegations in the Berry Action are without merit and they will be vigorously
defended. An Examination for Discovery of Kelly Shane Montalban took place over
two days on January 31, 2002 and February 1, 2002 in conjunction with this
action.


                                       27
<PAGE>
     The Tia Action, the BC Action and the Berry Action may be consolidated for
the purposes of trial due to the fact that there are numerous issues of fact and
law which are common to all of these actions.

     A loss by the Company of the claim for monetary damages would have a
material adverse effect on the Company's future results of operations, financial
condition and liquidity; however, the Company does not expect to lose this
action and believes additionally that it would be able to negotiate reasonable
payment terms should it lose this suit.

     The Company has entered into negotiations to settle outstanding litigation.
On February 5, 2002, counsel for Steven and Tia Berry presented to counsel for
the Company an offer to settle the Tia Action, the BC Action, the Berry Action
and the Montalban Action ("All Actions"). On March 4, 2002, counsel for the
Company sent to counsel for Steven and Tia Berry a counter-offer to settle All
Actions. On March 12, 2002, counsel for the Company received a letter for Steven
and Tia Berry rejecting the counter-offer to settle of March 2, 2002. The
Company has entered into settlement negotiations motivated by the best interests
of the Company but without any admission of liability.

SHANE  MONTALBAN  LITIGATION

     On June 15, 2001 the Company filed a Summons and Complaint against Kelly
Shane Montalban in the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York (CyPost Corp. v. Kelly Shane Montalban, Civ. 5447). The Complaint
alleged that, between September 1999 and June 15, 2001 (the "Recovery Period"),
numerous purchases and sales of the Company's common stock were made in
violation of the short swing profit recovery provisions of Section 16(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. ("Section 16(b)").

     Section 16(b) imposes strict liability on corporate insiders, including
principal stockholders, for engaging in short swing trading activities (a sale
and purchase or purchase and sale occurring within any six (6) month period)
without regard as to whether true profits were realized by the insider from such
trading activities. During the Recovery Period, numerous purchases and sales of
the Company's common stock were made in violation of Section 16(b). Although the
Company did not believe that any of such purchases and sales were based on
non-public information, the Company nonetheless required by the strict liability
provisions of Section 16(b) to seek recovery. The Company ultimately determined
that the amount of short swing profits realized within the Recovery Period was
$2,498,449 (the "Recovery Amount"). Mr. Montalban cooperated fully with the


                                       28
<PAGE>
Company's investigation and agreed to make payment in full of the Recovery
Amount. Pursuant thereto, on September 20, 2001 the Company entered into a
Settlement Agreement. Part of the Recovery Amount was paid by Mr. Montalban by
way of his delivery to the Company for cancellation, on September 20, 2001,
various promissory notes of the Company on which the Company owed an aggregate
of $2,344,788 in principal and $44,450 in interest or a total of $2,389,238.

     The notes delivered for cancellation included a note which had been
assigned to Mr. Montalban by the holder to satisfy an obligation of the holder
to Mr. Montalban, notes which had been purchased by Mr. Montalban from various
individuals, and a note held by Pacific Gate Capital Corporation, a corporation
owned by Mr. Montalban. The balance of the Recovery Amount was paid by the
issuance to the Company of his five (5) year, 5% promissory note, dated
September 20, 2001, in the principal amount of $109,211. In consideration of the
execution of the Settlement Agreement and payment of the Recovery Amount, on
October 9, 2001 the Company voluntarily dismissed its action.

     WORLDCOM  DISPUTE

     On June 30, 1999 NetRover Inc ("NetRover") entered into a Virtual Internet
Provider Agreement with WorldCom Canada Ltd ("WorldCom"). A dispute arose
between the parties regarding certain credits claimed by NetRover and amounts
claimed as owed by NetRover to WorldCom in the amount of Cdn$633,368.

     On November 8, 2001 NetRover entered into a Settlement Agreement
("Settlement") with WorldCom. The parties have agreed to a settlement of
Cdn$91,000, which have been paid in three installments.

The Company has complied with all terms of the Settlement Agreement.

     DOMINION ACTION

     On September 13, 2001, Dominion Information et al ("Dominion") commenced
suit in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Action # S015127, Vancouver
Registry (the "Dominion Action") against Hermes Net Solutions, CyPost
Corporation and Stephen Choi, a former shareholder, director and secretary of
Hermes Net Solutions until June 30, 1999. As of June 30, 1999, Hermes was a
wholly owned subsidiary of CyPost Corporation. In the Dominion Action, Dominion
claims $19,339 (CDN) from the defendant Hermes Net Solutions pursuant to an
agreement whereby Dominion published advertisements on behalf Hermes Net
Solutions. In the alternative, Dominion claims that CyPost Corporation was
unjustly enriched by the amount claimed. The defendants Hermes Net Solutions and
CyPost Corporation filed a Statement of Defense in the Dominion Action in which


                                       29
<PAGE>
they state that the defendant Stephen Choi did not have authority to enter any
agreement on their behalf. Furthermore, the Statement of Defense denies the
existence of an agreement, any benefit from an agreement or any unjust
enrichment from an agreement.

     On February 16, 2002, settlement terms were proposed by Dominion.  Hermes
Net Solutions and CyPost Corporation decided it would be in their best interest
to settle this litigation by making a lump sum payment and twelve monthly
payments commencing April 1, 2002 and to March 1, 2003.  When Hermes Net
Solutions has completed the payment schedule in March, 2003, Dominion will file
the Consent Dismissal Order, dismissing the Dominion Action.

     CNW ACTION

     On January 14, 2002, Connect Northwest Internet Services, LLC, a Washington
limited liability company, d/b/a Skagit County Networking LLC ("CNW") commenced
suit in the Superior Court of Washington for King County, Case No.
02-2-01906-4SEA, against CyPost Corporation (the "CNW Action").  In the CNW
Action, CNW claims $30,529 (U.S.) plus interest, costs and attorney's fees from
the Company on account of monies owing pursuant to an asset purchase agreement
of October 27, 1999.

     On February 13, 2002, the Company was able to settle this litigation.  The
Company agreed to make a lump sun payment of $6,000 U.S. to CNW by February 28,
2002 followed by payments of $4,000 U.S. on the 15th of each month thereafter
until August 15, 2002 for a total payment of $30,000 U.S.  Once the Company has
made its final payment on August, 15, 2002, CNW will dismiss the action.

     TAMI HELEN ALLAN

     On November 2, 2001, Tami Helen Allan ("Allan") commenced suit in the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Chatham-Kent, against NetRover Inc., CyPost
Corporation, Robert Sendoh, Kelly Shane Montalban, Angela Belcourt and J. Thomas
W. Johnston (the "Allan Action"). In the Allan Action, Allan claims that as a
result of the wrongful termination of Allan's employment, Allan has sustained
damages including loss of salary in the amount of $600,000 (CDN).

     On November 9, 2001 the Company filed a Notice of Defense. At the date of
this filing, the litigation remains at the pleadings stage.  Management of the
Company intends to vigorously defend the case.

     . A loss by the Company of the claim for monetary damages would have a
material adverse effect on the Company's future results of operations, financial
condition and liquidity; however, the Company does not expect to lose this
action and believes additionally that it would be able to negotiate reasonable
payment terms should it lose this suit.


                                       30
<PAGE>
     The Company is also subject to routine litigation from time to time in the
operations of its business.  None of such routine litigation is material to the
Company, its assets or results of operations.

     Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, the Company cannot predict
the outcome of any litigation to which it is a party.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

     None.

                                     PART II

Item 5.  Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

     Due to an amendment to the Company's article of incorporation on January
29, 2002, the authorized capital stock of the Company currently consists of
205,000,000 shares, of which 200,000,000 shares are designated as Common Stock
and 5,000,000 shares are designated as Preferred Stock, par value $.001 per
share. On September 24, 1999, the Company effected a 3-for-2 split of its shares
of Common Stock. All share amounts stated in this filing have been adjusted
retroactively to give effect to this stock split.

     The Company's Common Stock was first listed on the Over the Counter
Bulletin Board ("OTCBB") on September 24, 1998, under the symbol "POST." Prior
to that time, there was no market for the Company's Common Stock.

     On April 17, 2000, the Company's Common Stock was removed from trading on
the OTCBB, because of its failure to remain current in its Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC") reporting obligations as required by NASD Rule 6530.
Thereafter, the Company's Common Stock was quoted in the "Pink Sheets", pending
the Company's compliance with Exchange Act reporting requirements and the OTCBB
listing requirements. On March 27, 2001, the Company's Common Stock re-commenced
trading on the OTCBB, where it currently trades under the symbol "POST".

     The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low bid
prices of the Common Stock, for the period January 1, 2000 through December 31,
2001, as reported by Yahoo! Historical Prices.


                                       31
<PAGE>
                         2001                        2000
                 --------------------        --------------------
                 High Bid     Low Bid        High Bid     Low Bid

1st Quarter       $0.52        $0.06          $4.50         $3.00

2nd Quarter       $0.53        $0.07          $3.25         $0.75

3rd Quarter       $0.11        $0.05          $0.91         $0.05

4th Quarter       $0.35        $0.03          $0.73         $0.16


     These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up,
mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

     There were approximately 96 record holders of the Company's Common Stock as
of March 5, 2002.

     The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends and does not
intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future on the shares of Common
Stock. Cash dividends, if any, that may be paid in the future to holders of
Common Stock will be payable when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors
of the Company, based upon the Board's assessment of the financial condition of
the Company, its earnings, need for funds, capital requirements, and other
factors, including any applicable laws. The Company is not a party to any
agreement restricting the payment of dividends.

     Recent Sales of Unregistered Stock

     On March 2, 2000, the Company issued 26,500 shares of its commons stock in
an aggregate amount of $92,750 at the closing price of $3.50 per share on
February 29, 2000, to Kaplan, Gottbetter and Levenson, as payment of services
accrued at December 31, 1999 and through February 29, 2000.

     On March 13, 2000, the Company issued 80,558 shares of its common stock at
the closing price of $2.98 on July 12, 1999 (as adjusted for a 3-for-2 stock
split), the date of signing the Letter of Intent, to the owners of Internet
Arena, Inc., as payment for the balance due in the amount of $240,000 in
connection with the Company's acquisition of that entity.

     On June 8, 2000, the Company issued 785,455 shares of its common stock to
the selling stockholders of Playa as partial payment of the purchase price
$3,000,000 in connection with the Company's acquisition of that company. See
Note 3 to "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Acquisition of Playa
Corporation".

     On August 1, 2000, the Company issued an aggregate 129,500 shares of its
common stock in an aggregate amount of $76,897 to seven employees at the closing
price of $0.5938 per share on July 17, 2000 in consideration for their providing
certain services to the Company from June 16, 2000 through July 15, 2000.
Subsequently 10,000 of these shares were canceled. For purposes of financial
statement presentation, those shares were deemed canceled as of October 1, 2000.


                                       32
<PAGE>
     On August 1, 2000, the Company issued 75,000 shares of its common stock in
an aggregate amount of $133,605 to each of the Company's three directors at the
closing price of $0.5938 on July 17, 2000 in consideration for their providing
certain services to the Company from June 16 through July 15, 2000.

     On August 17, 2000, the Company issued an aggregate 43,500 shares of its
common stock in an aggregate amount of $25,787 to six people at the closing
price of $0.5938 per share on July 25, 2000 in consideration for their providing
consulting work to the Company from April 1, 2000 through June 30, 2000.

     On October 1, 2000, the Company accrued the issuance of an aggregate 27,500
shares of its common stock in an aggregate amount of $8,800 to three employees
and one consultant at the closing price of $0.32 per share in consideration for
their providing certain services to the Company. Subsequently in the first
quarter 2001, 25,000 of these shares were issued and 2,500 shares were issued in
the second quarter 2001. For purposes of financial statement presentation, all
shares were deemed issued as of October 1, 2000.

     On December 29, 2000, the Company accrued the issuance of 2,500 shares of
its common stock in an aggregate amount of $450 to a consultant at the closing
price of $0.18 per share in consideration for his providing certain services to
the Company. As of December 31, 2000, these shares were not issued, however for
purposes of financial statement presentation, all shares were deemed issued as
of December 29, 2000. These shares were issued in 2001

     On March 31, 2001, the Company reflected the issuance of 2,500 shares of
its common stock in an aggregate amount of $1,275 to one consultant at the
closing price of $0.51 per share in consideration for his providing certain
services to the Company.  These shares were issued on May 16, 2001, however for
purposes of financial statement presentation, all shares were deemed issued as
of March 31, 2001.

     On November 16, 2001, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its common
stock in an aggregate amount of $85,000 to Adam Gottbetter at the closing price
of $0.085 per share in consideration for his providing legal services to the
Company.

     On December 11, 2001, the Company issued 400,000 shares of its common stock
in an aggregate amount of $100,000 to Martin and Associates at the closing price
of $0.25 per share in consideration of them providing legal services to the
Company.

     On December 11, 2001, the Company issued 230,000 shares of its common stock
in an aggregate amount of $57,500 to Andrew Stack, LLP at the closing price of
$0.25 per share in consideration of them providing legal services to the
Company.


                                       33
<PAGE>
     Stock Options

     On January 10, 2001, the Company issued an option to purchase 1,000,000
shares of the Company's common stock to Robert Adams, who, at such time, was
serving as President, Chief Operating Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
of the Company. On that date, the Company also issued an option to purchase
125,000 shares of the Company's common stock to Tami Allan, who, at that time
was serving as Vice President of North American Operations of the Company.  The
exercise price of each option is $.10 per share and vests over time. The options
were issued pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in Section
4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), for
transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. Mr. Adams and Ms.
Allan are no longer employees of the Company. On December 10, 2001, Mr. Adams
gave notice to the Company indicating that he wished to exercise 2,500 options
pursuant to the non-qualified stock option agreement. On January 2002 2,500
shares were issued to Mr. Adams. Unvested options for Mr. Adams in the amount of
500,000 have been cancelled.

Item 6.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
         Results of Operations

     The following discussion and analysis is provided to increase the
understanding of, and should be read in conjunction with, the Consolidated
Financial Statements of the Company and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this
Report. Historical results and percentage relationships among any amounts in
these financial statements are not necessarily indicative of trends in operating
results for any future period. The statements which are not historical facts
contained in this Report, including this Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements, constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are
based on currently available operating, financial and competitive information,
and are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Future events and the
Company's actual results may differ materially from the results reflected in
these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference
include, but are not limited to, dependence on existing and future key strategic
and strategic end-user customers, limited ability to establish new strategic
relationships, ability to sustain and manage growth, variability of operating
results, the Company's expansion and development of new service lines, marketing
and other business development initiatives, the commencement of new engagements,
competition in the industry, general economic conditions, dependence on key
personnel, the ability to attract, hire and retain personnel who possess the
technical skills and experience necessary to meet the service requirements of
its clients, the potential liability with respect to actions taken by its
existing and past employees, risks associated with international sales, and
other risks described herein and in the Company's other SEC filings.

Overview

     The  Company  is  engaged  in  the  business  of providing Internet service
provider  ("ISP")  services ("ISP Services") for business and personal use.
Previously,  the  Company  was also involved in developing certain software
products,  which  activities  the  Company  no  longer  pursues.


                                       34
<PAGE>
     The  Company  was  a  development  stage company until the first quarter of
1999,  when it began to broaden its strategic focus through the acquisition of
six  ISPs.  Currently,  providing  ISP  Services  is  the  focus of the
Company's  business.  The Company's  business  operations  are  presently
conducted  in  the  United  States  and  Canada.

     The Company derives virtually all of its revenues from its ISP Services. At
present,  most  of  the  revenue  from  ISP  Services  can be attributed to
connectivity,  although  the  Company's  network  of ISP Services is moving
towards  focusing  on  Web  hosting  and server co-location, anticipating a
strong  hold  over  connectivity  by  the larger ISPs in a few years' time.

     During 2001, the Company continued to  streamline and consolidate its ISP
Services operations to enhance efficiency and reduce operating expenses. The
Company has embarked on a program to centralize ISP Services to the greatest
extent possible, as follows:

     o Customer Support. During early 2001, the Company began consolidating all
     aspects of customer support (including end user technical issues) for its
     Oregon ISP customers into the Chatham, Ontario facility. The Washington
     state ISP customer support is handled in the Mt. Vernon office.

     o Billing and Collections. In early 2001 the billing and collections for
     the Oregon ISP customers were consolidated into the Chatham facility,
     billing and collections for the Washington ISP Services customers is
     expected to be consolidated in Q2 2002.

     o Network Operations. The Company has two regionally-based maintenance and
     repair teams. A team based in Toronto provides primary monitoring and
     repair of all servers and routers covering all Canadian ISP Services
     customers and provides overflow assistance to the Pacific Northwest, while
     a Seattle team provides primary monitoring and repair of all servers and
     routers covering all of the US ISP Services customers and provides overflow
     assistance to Canada.

     The  Company  is also consolidating Web hosting and dedicated services into
Toronto, a process which began in late-2000 and is expected to be completed by
Q2 -2002.  Other  ISP  Services such as e-mail and user authentication (i.e.,
customer  security)  will continue to be handled from regional data centers.
Beginning in early 2001, all new Web hosting customers, wherever located, were
hosted from Toronto.  The Company is also considering implementing other
consolidated services to achieve greater efficiency and cost savings.


                                       35
<PAGE>
     On January 31, 2000, the Company suffered a fire loss at its Etobicoke
(suburban Toronto), Ontario facility. The loss was completely covered by
insurance. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, the Company
received net proceeds from fire insurance in the amount of $11,449 and $228,966,
respectively.

     During Q4 of 2001, the Company signed an agreement with Dialup USA Inc, a
leading ISP wholesale aggregator, to provide nationwide 56K dialup access  to
potentially over 5600 points of presence (POP's) in the United States.

     Also during Q4, the Company launched NetRoverUSA Online Inc, a national ISP
operating in the United States offering consumers a reliable, affordable
alternative to the "Bigger ISP's".

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to the Year
Ended December 31, 2000

     Substantially all of the Company's revenue was earned from ISP Services
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001. The Company generated net
revenue of $3,706,386 during fiscal 2001, compared to $4,595,823 during fiscal
2000. This decrease is primarily due to the discontinuation of Playa Corporation
during the fourth quarter of 2000, a decrease in marketing related activities,
and the softening of technology related sector spending.

     Direct costs, which consist primarily of telecommunications charges
associated with providing Internet connection services to customers, were
$1,858,619 during fiscal 2001, compared to $2,138,456  during fiscal 2000. The
decrease results  primarily  reflect the renegotiation of several
telecommunication contracts  to  the  Company's  benefit.

     Selling, general and administrative expenses were $2,655,940during fiscal
2001, compared to $3,599,690 during fiscal 2000. The decrease in such expenses
during fiscal 2001 results primarily from a further reduction in salaries  and
benefits,  consolidation  of  the  operation  of  the  Company's  ISP businesses
and  a  decrease  in  marketing  related  activities.

     Amortization and depreciation was $2,151,090 during fiscal 2001, compared
to $2,859,519 during fiscal 2000. The decrease in such expenses during fiscal
2001 is primarily due  to the discontinuation of  Playa Corporation during the
fourth quarter of 2000.

     The Company had interest expense in the amount of $117,935 during fiscal
2001, compared to $2,113,570 during fiscal 2000. The amount expensed in fiscal
2000 consists of (i) a beneficial conversion feature in the amount of $1,962,500
attributable to renegotiation of the conversion feature of loans made to the
Company by Blue Heron Venture Fund Ltd. ("Blue Heron"), which loans are
unsecured, bear interest at 8% per annum and are payable on demand and (ii)
interest expense in the amount of $151,070 attributable to interest for Blue
Heron and Pacific Gate Capital Corporation ("Pacific Gate"), another of the
Company's lenders.


                                       36
<PAGE>
     On June 18, 2001 at the request of Blue Heron Venture Fund, Ltd. (Blue
Heron), Blue Heron Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $2,085,000 were
cancelled and on June 19, 2001 new promissory notes (the "Blue Heron Shareholder
Notes") in the aggregate principal amount of $2,319,788 were issued to the
shareholders of Blue Heron and Blue Heron's fund manager, Monet Management Group
Ltd. See "Exhibits 2.2 through 2.8" below. The principal amount of the Blue
Heron Shareholder Notes was comprised of the $2,085,000 principal amount of the
Blue Heron Notes and the $234,788 in interest due on the Blue Heron Notes at the
time of cancellation. The Blue Heron Shareholder Notes were unsecured and were
payable on demand. $2,085,000 in principal amount of the Blue Heron Shareholder
Notes bore interest at 8% per annum. The balance of the Blue Heron Shareholder
Notes did not provide for the payment of interest.

     On  September 20, 2001 the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement (the
"Settlement  Agreement")  with Kelly Shane Montalban with regard to a lawsuit it
had  instituted  against  him  on  June  15,  2001 in the United States District
Court  for  the  Southern  District of New York seeking recovery of short  swing
profits  realized  by  Mr.  Montalban  and  other  persons  whose purchases  and
sales  of  Company  common  stock  were  attributed  to  Mr.  Montalban  in
violation of Section 16(b)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  as  amended
(see  Shane  Montalban Litigation below). Pursuant to the Settlement  Agreement,
Mr.  Montalban  paid  the  Company  an  aggregate  of  approximately  $2,498,449
(the  "Recovery  Amount"),  which amount represented recovery  in  full  of  Mr.
Montalban's  short  swing  profits. He did so by delivering  to  the Company for
cancellation  (1)  the  Blue  Heron Shareholder Notes in the aggregate principal
amount  of  $2,319,788,  which  notes  had  been  previously  purchased  by  or
assigned  to  Mr. Montalban; (2) the accrued interest  of  $42,384  due  on  the
principal  portion  of  the  Blue  Heron  Shareholder  Notes  at  the  time  of
cancellation;  (3)  8%  demand  notes  of the Company  dated August 25, 2000 and
September  11,  2000,  respectively,  in  the  aggregate  principal  amount  of
$25,000  issued  to  Pacific  Gate  Capital  Corporation,  a  corporation  owned
by  Mr.  Montalban  (the "Pacific Gate Capital  Notes");  and  (4)  the  accrued
interest  of  $2,066  due  on  the  principal  portion  of  the  Pacific  Gate
Capital  Notes  at  the  time  of cancellation.  The  balance  of  the  Recovery
Amount  was  paid  by  Mr.  Montalban's  issuance  to  the Company of a five (5)
year,  5%  promissory  note,  dated  September  20,  2001,  in  the  principal
amount  of  $109,211.  In  consideration  of  the  execution  of  the Settlement
Agreement  and payment of the  Recovery   Amount, on October 9, 2001 the Company
voluntarily  dismissed
its  action.

     On October 1, 2001 the Company entered into a consulting agreement with
Pacific Gate Capital Corporation for a one year period in the amount of $27,750
minimum per month for providing certain services to the Company. This agreement
was subsequently cancelled. In the year 2001 the consulting payments reduced the
principal amount owing by Mr. Montalban in the amount of $109,211 by $53,250.


                                       37
<PAGE>
     The Company has accrued interest of $1,237 for the period September 20 to
December 31, 2001. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources" below.

     The Company had a net loss of $570,352, or $.03 per share, for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2001, compared to a net loss of $8,288,879, or $.39 per
share, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000. The decrease in  net loss
was primarily a result  of  the  increase in other revenue due to a recovery of
short swing profits from a principal shareholder as well as a decrease in direct
costs; selling, general and administrative expenses; amortization and
depreciation; and interest expense. The loss from operations in fiscal 2000 was
augmented by the write off of certain assets, and partially offset by net
proceeds from fire insurance and gain on sale of CyPost KK. During the quarter
ended December 31, 2000, the Company abandoned Playa's business, resulting in a
loss of $2,201,253, and wrote off its impaired Software Products assets in the
amount of $128,726. During fiscal 2000, the Company recognized gain on the sale
of CyPost KK in the amount of $36,202 and received net proceeds from fire
insurance in the aggregate amount of $228,966, in connection with a fire
suffered at the Etobicoke (suburban Toronto), Ontario facility in January 2000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern
basis, which assumes that the Company will continue in operation for at least
one year and will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in
the normal course of business. The Company incurred a net loss for the year
ended December 31, 2001 of $570,352, compared to a net loss for the year ended
December 31, 2000 of $8,288,879. For the year ended December 31, 2001, the
Company had a working capital deficit of $1,409,518, which is primarily due to
the Company's  general  operating activities  and professional fees. These
factors indicate that the Company's continuation as a going concern is dependent
upon its ability to obtain adequate financing.

     The Company has obtained most of its financing through Blue Heron. The
loans were made under agreements pursuant to which the Company could borrow up
to $16,000,000 in unsecured loans from Blue Heron. The loans are evidenced by
the Company's Convertible Demand Notes (the "Blue Heron Demand Notes"). The Blue
Heron Demand Notes bear interest at 8% per annum, are payable on demand and are
convertible into shares of the Company's Common Stock at the lender's option, in
which case Blue Heron would waive its right to be paid interest under the Blue
Heron Demand Notes. During 1999, $4,000,000 of outstanding loans were converted
into 4,500,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock. On August 16, 1999,
$1,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Blue Heron Demand Notes were converted
into 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock, at a conversion price of $0.67 per share.
On November 24, 1999, an aggregate additional principal amount of $3,000,000 of
Blue Heron Demand Notes were converted into an additional 3,000,000 shares of
Common Stock, at a conversion price of $1.00 per share.


                                       38
<PAGE>
     On April 27, 2000, the Company renegotiated the conversion share price of
its remaining $2,000,000 and $10,000,000 loan facilities with Blue Heron. The
conversion feature with respect to the loan facility in the amount of $2,000,000
was reduced from $1.33 per share to $.75 per share, and the conversion feature
with respect to the loan facility in the amount of $10,000,000 was reduced from
$2.67 per share to $.75 per share.

     During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, the Company borrowed an
additional $1,210,000 from Blue Heron, resulting in an aggregate outstanding
principal amount of the loans of $2,085,000 as of December 31, 2000. The loans
were unsecured, bore interest at 8% per annum, and the principal and accrued
interest were due on demand. The lender had the option to withdraw its offer to
lend at any time and to convert the loans into shares of common stock of the
Company. As of December 31, 2001, pursuant to the September 20, 2001 Montalban
Settlement Agreement,  the  loan  balance  was canceled and deemed  to  have
been  paid  in  full.

     During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, the Company borrowed an
aggregate $125,000 from Pacific Gate, of which amount $25,000 was outstanding on
December 31, 2000. The loan was unsecured, bore interest of 8% per annum, and
the principal and accrued interest were due on demand.  As of December 31, 2001,
pursuant to the September 20, 2001 Montalban Settlement Agreement,  the  loan
balance  was canceled  and deemed  to  have  been  paid  in  full.

     On June 18, 2001 at the request of Blue Heron Venture Fund, Ltd. (Blue
Heron), Blue Heron Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $2,085,000 were
cancelled and on June 19, 2001 new promissory notes (the "Blue Heron Shareholder
Notes") in the aggregate principal amount of $2,319,788 were issued to the
shareholders of Blue Heron and Blue Heron's fund manager, Monet Management Group
Ltd. The principal amount of the Blue Heron Shareholder Notes was comprised of
the $2,085,000 principal amount of the Blue Heron Notes and the $234,788 in
interest due on the Blue Heron Notes at the time of cancellation. The Blue Heron
Shareholder Notes were unsecured and were payable on demand. $2,085,000 in
principal amount of the Blue Heron Shareholder Notes bore interest at 8% per
annum. The balance of the Blue Heron Shareholder Notes did not provide for the
payment of interest.

     On September 20, 2001 the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement (the
"Settlement Agreement") with Kelly Shane Montalban with regard to a lawsuit it
had instituted against him on June 15, 2001 in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of New York seeking recovery of short swing profits
realized by Mr. Montalban and other persons whose purchases and sales of Company
common stock were attributed to Mr. Montalban in violation of Section 16(b)] of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (see Shane Montalban Litigation
below). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Mr. Montalban paid the Company an
aggregate of approximately $2,498,449 (the "Recovery Amount"), which amount


                                       39
<PAGE>
represented recovery in full of Mr. Montalban's short swing profits. He did so
by delivering to the Company for cancellation (1) the Blue Heron Shareholder
Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $2,319,788, which notes had been
previously purchased by or assigned to Mr. Montalban; (2) the accrued interest
of $42,384 due on the principal portion of the Blue Heron Shareholder Notes at
the time of cancellation; (3) 8% demand notes of the Company dated August 25,
2000 and September 11, 2000, respectively, in the aggregate principal amount of
$25,000 issued to Pacific Gate Capital Corporation, a corporation owned by Mr.
Montalban (the "Pacific Gate Capital Notes"); and (4) the accrued interest of
$2,066 due on the principal portion of the Pacific Gate Capital Notes at the
time of cancellation. The balance of the Recovery Amount was paid by Mr.
Montalban's issuance to the Company of a five (5) year, 5% promissory note,
dated September 20, 2001, in the principal amount of $109,211. In consideration
of the execution of the Settlement Agreement and payment of the Recovery Amount,
on October 9, 2001 the Company voluntarily dismissed its action.

     On October 1, 2001 the Company entered into a consulting agreement with
Pacific Gate Capital Corporation for a one year period in the amount of $27,750
minimum per month for providing certain services to the Company. This agreement
was subsequently cancelled. In the year 2001 the consulting payments reduced the
principal amount owing by Mr. Montalban in the amount of $109,211 by $53,250.

     In connection with the acquisition of Playa, the Company assumed certain
loans payable by Playa. As of September 30, 2000, the last date for which
financial statements for Playa were available, the aggregate outstanding
principal amount of the loans was $608,392. This  loan balance has been written
off in connection with the abandonment of Playa's business. See Note 3 to "Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - Acquisition of Playa Corporation".

     During its period of ownership of CyPost KK, the Company loaned CyPost KK
$64,764 and CyPost KK paid certain expenses on behalf of the Company in the
amount of $25,542, leaving a balance of $39,222 owed by CyPost KK to the Company
at the time of sale. In connection with the sale by the Company of all of its
interest in CyPost KK, the Company canceled the net outstanding balance of
$39,222 in loans made by the Company to CyPost KK and CyPost KK canceled $39,222
in loans made by CyPost KK to Playa. At September 30, 2000, the last date for
which financial statements for Playa were available, there was a balance of
$168,062 owed by Playa to CyPost KK. This loan balance has been written off in
connection with the abandonment of Playa's business. See Note 3 to "Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements - Acquisition of Playa Corporation".

     The Company's cash position on December 31, 2001 decreased to $73,124,
compared to $250,631 on December 31, 2000. This  decrease  is primarily due to
the Company  not  borrowing  additional  funds  during  the  fiscal year ended
December 31,  2001.


                                       40
<PAGE>
     The Company's net cash used in operating activities totaled $(91,885)
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, compared to $(925,162) during
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000. The decrease in cash used from
operations is due to the Company's mandate of reducing its direct costs and
selling, general and administrative expenses in order to bring the Company's
expenses in line with its revenues.

     The Company's net cash used in investing activities totaled $61,388 during
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, compared to $569,521 during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2000. This decrease is primarily due to the Company  not
being  as  aggressive  as  previous  years  in  acquisitions.

     Capitalized software development costs during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2000 totaled $87,431. The Company has written off its Software
Products assets. See Part I, Item 1, "Description of Business - Software
Products Business"

     The Company did not receive any proceeds from financing activities during
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, compared to the financing activities
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 which consisted of $1,413,589 of
gross loan proceeds provided by Blue Heron, CyPost KK management and Pacific
Gate. As of December 31, 2001, pursuant to the September 20, 2001 Montalban
Settlement Agreement, the loan balance was canceled and deemed to have been paid
in full. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources" above.


Item 7.  Financial Statements

     The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company are submitted as a
separate section of this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB commencing on Page F-1
immediately following Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure

     None

Part III

Item 9.  Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons;
         Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

     The following table sets forth certain information concerning the directors
and executive officers of the Company as of March 31 2002:


                                       41
<PAGE>
        Name             Age     All Positions with the Company

J. Thomas W. Johnston     60     Chairman of the Board

Javan Khazali             38     Managing Director, Director and Treasurer

Sandra Lynn Warren        35     President, Director and Secretary


     J. Thomas W. Johnston joined the Company as a Director on January 17, 2000
and was elected Chairman of the Board November 5, 2001. Mr. Johnston retired at
the end of October 2001 as an airline pilot for Canadian Airlines, now known as
Air Canada, and served more than 35 years in that capacity, including 29 years
of service as a Captain. Mr. Johnston has also been active in representing the
airline pilot's association in a number of high-level capacities, primarily in
the fields of industrial relations, contract negotiations and administration,
and has been involved in many high-level contract settlements.

     Javan Khazali became Managing Director on February 20, 2002. Mr. Khazali
joined the Company in July of 2001 as Vice President of Administration and was
elected Director and Treasurer February 8, 2002. With extensive experience in
the services sector, Mr. Khazali is responsible for the day to day operations of
CyPost, including the development and continuing management of our business and
training programs. Mr. Khazali has held various senior management positions
including (i) Operation Manager for 10 high-end chain restaurants in the U.S.
and Canada, (ii) Director of Operations for nine restaurants where he was
responsible for supervision of 300 plus employees, and (iii) most recently as
Managing Partner of two local restaurants where he was responsible for
supervision of 45 employees.

     Sandra Lynn Warren has been with the Company for more than three years and
became a Director on October 12, 2001 and was appointed as President on October
30, 2001. Ms. Warren was appointed as Secretary on February 8, 2002. She has a
diverse background in office and administrative management. Mrs. Warren has
worked in administration and accounting in a variety of industries including
print media, hospitality and group insurance. Mrs. Warren's responsibilities
include handling internal accounting matters, overseeing SEC filings,
interacting with our legal counsel and independent accountants, and serving as
our contact person for dealings involving the listing and sale of the Company's
stock

     Robert Sendoh served as Chairman of the Board since the Company's inception
on September 5, 1997 until November 5, 2001 and continued as a Director until
February 8, 2002. On January 17, 2000, Mr. Sendoh succeeded Steven M. Berry as
Chief Executive Officer and resigned from that position on August 31, 2000.


                                       42
<PAGE>
     Angela Belcourt joined CyPost in 2000, and was appointed President June 8,
2001. Ms. Belcourt resigned as a Director from the Company for health reasons on
October 12, 2001, and President on October 30, 2001.

     Robert Adams served as a Director, President, Chief Operating Officer,
Secretary and Treasure of the Company from July 25, 2000 to June 8, 2001. Mr.
Adams did not furnish the Company any correspondence requesting disclosure of
any matter concerning his resignation as a Director, President, Chief Operating
Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company. Mr. Adams resigned from all
positions with the Company September 28, 2001.

     Tami Allan served as Vice President of North American Operations for the
Company from July 25, 2000 to August 2, 2002. Ms. Allan was terminated from the
Company, see Part I, Item 3, "Legal Proceedings".

     The present term of each director expires at the next Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of the Company. Executive officers are elected at the Annual
Meeting of the Board of Directors held immediately following the Annual Meeting
of Stockholders and serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.

     Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

     Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires
the Company's directors and executive officers, and persons who beneficially own
more than 10% of a registered class of the Company's equity securities, to file
reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership of the
Company's securities with the SEC on Forms 3 (Initial Statement of Beneficial
Ownership), 4 (Statement of Changes of Beneficial Ownership of Securities) and 5
(Annual Statement of Beneficial Ownership of Securities). Directors, executive
officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of the Company's Common Stock
are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all
Section 16(a) forms that they file. Except as otherwise set forth herein, based
solely on review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company, or
written representations that no reports were required, the Company believes that
for the period from January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001, all directors,
executive officers and greater than 10% beneficial owners complied with all
Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them.

Item 10. Executive Compensation

     Cash Compensation

     The following table sets forth compensation paid or awarded by the Company
during each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000 to
all the persons that served as the Company's Chief Executive Officer. No
executive officers of the Company received compensation in excess of $100,000
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001:


                                       43
<PAGE>
                           SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                Long Term
                                   Annual Compensation        Compensation

                                         Restricted Stock
Name and Principal Position        Year      Salary              Awards

Robert Sendoh (1),                 2000     $ 44,115           75,000(2)
  Former Chairman of the Board     2001     $  3,770
  And Former Chief Executive
  Officer

Robert Adams (3),            -    2000      $ 46,704
  Former President and            2001      $ 36,072          500,000(4)
  Former Chief Operating Officer

Angela Belcourt,(5)               2001      $ 22,246
  Former President                2000      $ 15,302           35,000(6)

Sandra Warren, (7)                2001      $ 41,706
  President                       2000      $ 30,167           25,000(8)

Steven M. Berry(9),               2000      $  5,207
Former Executive Officer, Chief
Operating Officer and President


The Company does not have written employment agreements with any of its
Officers.  The Company currently does not have any key person insurance.

------------

(1) Mr. Sendoh was Chairman of the Company from September 5, 1997 until November
5, 2001 and continued as a Director until February 8, 2002.  Mr. Sendoh was
Chief Executive Officer of the Company from January 17, 2000 through August 31,
2000.

(2)  On August 1, 2000, Mr. Sendoh received 75,000 shares of the Company's
Common Stock, valued at $.5938 per share, for his service as a director of the
Company from June 16, 2000 through July 15, 2000.

(3) The Company has not had a Chief Executive Officer since August 31, 2000.
Mr. Adams served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company from
July 25, 2000 to June 8, 2001. Mr. Adams resigned from all positions with the
Company on September 28, 2001.


                                       44
<PAGE>
(4) Pursuant to the non-qualified stock option agreement, Mr. Adams has a total
of 500,000 shares vested, which he may exercise at $0.10 per share for a period
of twelve (12) months after he ceased being an employee, expiring on September
28, 2002.

(5) Ms. Belcourt was appointed President June 8, 2001. Ms. Belcourt resigned as
a Director from the Company for health reasons on October 12, 2001, and
subsequently resigned as President on October 30, 2001.

(6) On August 1st, 2000, the Company issued 35,000 shares of its common stock to
Ms. Belcourt, valued at $0.5938 per share in consideration for providing certain
services to the Company from June 16, 2000 through July 15, 2000.

(7) Ms. Warren became a Director on October 12, 2001 and was appointed as
President on October 30, 2001. Ms. Warren was appointed as Secretary on February
8, 2002.

(8) On August 1st, 2000, the Company issued 25,000 shares of its common stock to
Ms. Warren, valued at $0.5938 per share in consideration for providing certain
services to the Company from June 16, 2000 through July 15, 2000.

(9) Mr. Berry became Chief Executive Officer of the Company on January 4, 1999,
and served in that capacity until his resignation on January 17, 2000.

Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

     The following table sets forth certain information with respect to all
persons, or groups of persons, known by the Company to own beneficially more
than five percent of the Common Stock of the Company, and as to the beneficial
ownership thereof of the directors and executive officers of the Company,
individually and as a group, all as at January 14, 2002:

Name and Address of                       Shares            Percentage
 Beneficial Owner                     Beneficially Owned    Ownership

Kelly Shane Montalban(2)                   2,116,957          9.13%
P.O. Box 700, Lions Bay
Vancouver, British Columbia  V0N 2E0
Canada

Robert Sendoh                                355,000          1.53%
900-1281 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, British Columbia  V6E 3J7
Canada


                                       45
<PAGE>
J. Thomas W. Johnston (1)                    206,000           .89%
900-1281 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, British Columbia  V6E 3J7
Canada

Sandra Lynn Warren                            20,000           .08%
900-1281 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, British Columbia  V6E 3J7
Canada

Javan Khazali                                 41,000           .17%
900-1281 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, British Columbia  V6E 3J7
Canada

All Directors  and Executive                 622,000          2.68%
Officers as a Group (4
Persons)

(1)  Includes 25,000 shares owned by Mr. Johnston's wife and an aggregate of
     75,000 shares owned in trust for Mr. Johnston's three daughters.

(2)  Includes 7,500 shares owned by Mr. Montalban's wife and 7,500 shares owned
     in trust for Mr. Montalban's daughter.

Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

     The Company has obtained most of its financing through Blue Heron Venture
Fund Ltd. ("Blue Heron"), a corporation in which Kelly Shane Montalban may be
deemed to have an "indirect pecuniary" interest as a result of his status as
fund manager for Blue Heron. Blue Heron and Mr. Montalban are principal
stockholders of the Company. Blue Heron may be deemed to be an affiliate of
Pacific Gate, another of the Company's lenders, in which Mr. Montalban is the
sole stockholder, sole director and sole officer. Blue Heron loans were
unsecured and were convertible into Common Stock at the lender's option, in
which case Blue Heron would waive its right to be paid interest. The balance of
these loans as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 are $0 and $2,085,000,
respectively.

     During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, the Company borrowed an
aggregate $125,000 from Pacific Gate Capital Ltd. ("Pacific Gate"), of which
amount $25,000 was outstanding on December 31, 2000. These loans bear interest
at 8% per annum and are payable on demand. The balance of these loans as of
December 31, 2001 is $0.


                                       46
<PAGE>
     On  June  18,  2001  at  the request of Blue Heron Venture Fund, Ltd. (Blue
Heron),  Blue  Heron  Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $2,085,000 were
cancelled  and on June 19, 2001 new promissory notes (the "Blue Heron
Shareholder  Notes")  in  the aggregate principal amount of $2,319,788 were
issued  to  the  shareholders  of Blue Heron and Blue Heron's fund manager,
Monet  Management  Group  Ltd.  The  principal  amount  of  the  Blue Heron
Shareholder  Notes  was comprised of the $2,085,000 principal amount of the Blue
Heron  Notes and the $234,788 in interest due on the Blue Heron Notes at  the
time  of  cancellation.  The  Blue  Heron  Shareholder  Notes were unsecured and
were payable on demand. $2,085,000 in principal amount of the Blue  Heron
Shareholder Notes bore interest at 8% per annum. The balance of the  Blue  Heron
Shareholder  Notes  did  not  provide  for the payment of interest.

     On  September 20, 2001 the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement (the
"Settlement Agreement") with Kelly Shane Montalban with regard to a lawsuit it
had  instituted  against  him  on  June  15,  2001 in the United States District
Court  for  the Southern District of New York seeking recovery of short  swing
profits  realized  by  Mr.  Montalban and other persons whose purchases  and
sales  of  Company  common  stock  were  attributed  to Mr. Montalban  in
violation of Section 16(b)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  as  amended
(see Shane Montalban Litigation below). Pursuant to the Settlement  Agreement,
Mr.  Montalban  paid  the  Company  an aggregate of approximately  $2,498,449
(the "Recovery Amount"), which amount represented recovery  in  full  of  Mr.
Montalban's  short swing profits. He did so by delivering  to  the Company for
cancellation (1) the Blue Heron Shareholder Notes in the aggregate principal
amount of $2,319,788, which notes had been previously  purchased  by  or
assigned  to  Mr. Montalban; (2) the accrued interest  of  $42,384  due  on  the
principal  portion  of  the Blue Heron Shareholder  Notes  at the time of
cancellation; (3) 8% demand notes of the Company  dated August 25, 2000 and
September 11, 2000, respectively, in the aggregate  principal  amount  of
$25,000  issued  to  Pacific Gate Capital Corporation,  a  corporation  owned
by  Mr.  Montalban  (the "Pacific Gate Capital  Notes");  and  (4)  the  accrued
interest  of  $2,066  due on the principal  portion  of  the  Pacific  Gate
Capital  Notes  at  the time of cancellation.  The  balance  of  the  Recovery
Amount  was  paid  by  Mr. Montalban's issuance to the Company of a five (5)
year, 5% promissory note, dated  September  20,  2001,  in  the  principal
amount  of  $109,211.  In consideration  of  the execution of the Settlement
Agreement and payment of the  Recovery  Amount, on October 9, 2001 the Company
voluntarily dismissed
its  action.

     On October 1, 2001 the Company entered into a consulting agreement with
Pacific Gate Capital Corporation for a one year period in the amount of $27,750
minimum per month for providing certain services to the Company. This agreement
was subsequently cancelled. In the year 2001 the consulting payments reduced the
principal amount owing by Mr. Montalban in the amount of $109,211 by $53,250.


                                       47
<PAGE>
PART IV

Item 13. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

     (a)  List of documents filed as part of this Report

1.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITEM 7:

Independent Auditors' Report                                               F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2001 and 2000               F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
     December 31, 2001 and 2000                                            F-3

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
     December 31, 2001 and 2000                                            F-4

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended
     December 31, 2001 and 2000                                            F-5


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements                             F-6


2.   EXHIBITS:

     The following exhibits listed are filed as part of this Report:

      Exhibit
         No.      Description

Exhibit
No.              Description

10.1   Promissory Notes executed by CyPost Corporation dated June 19, 2001; in
       favor of James A. Mylock, JR.

10.2   Promissory Notes executed by CyPost Corporation dated June 19, 2001; in
       favor of Amanda E. Johnson.

10.3   Promissory Notes executed by CyPost Corporation dated June 19, 2001; in
       favor of John M. Peragine.

10.4   Promissory Notes executed by CyPost Corporation dated June 19, 2001; in
       favor of Joseph A. Fiore.

10.5   Promissory Notes executed by CyPost Corporation dated June 19, 2001; in
       favor of Berkshire Capital Management Co., Inc.

10.6   Promissory Notes executed by CyPost Corporation dated June 19, 2001; in
       favor of Bayshore Trading LTD.

10.7   Promissory Notes executed by CyPost Corporation dated June 19, 2001; in
       favor of Kelly Shane Montalban.

10.8   Settlement Agreement dated as of September 20, 2001 between CyPost
       Corporation and Kelly  Shane Montalban. regarding violations of Section
       16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

10.9   Promissory Note executed by CyPost Corporation dated September 2001; in
       favor of CyPost Corporation.


                                       48
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES

     In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



DATE: April 12, 2002                 CYPOST CORPORATION




                By:  /s/  Javan Khazali
                   -----------------------------------
                   Javan Khazali
                   Managing Director, Treasurer, Principal Financial, Executive,
                   and Accounting Officer


     In accordance with the Exchange Act, this Report has been signed below by
the following persons on behalf of registrant and in the capacities indicated
and on the dates indicated.

Name                                 Title                            Date

/s/  J. Thomas W. Johnston     Chairman of the Board              April 12, 2002
--------------------------     and Director
J. Thomas W. Johnston

/s/  Javan Khazali             Managing Director                  April 12, 2002
--------------------------     Treasurer, Principal Financial,
Javan Khazali                  Executive, Accounting Officer
                               and Director



                                       49
<PAGE>
                       CYPOST CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                          INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Independent Auditors' Report                                                F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2001 and 2000                F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
     December 31, 2001 and 2000                                             F-3

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
     December 31, 2001 and 2000                                             F-4

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended
     December 31, 2001 and 2000                                             F-5


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements                              F-6


<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
CyPost Corporation and Subsidiaries


We  have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheets  of  CyPost
Corporation  and  Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2001 and 2000,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an  opinion  on  these  consolidated  financial  statements based on our audits.

We  conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standard generally accepted
in  the  United  States  of  America.  Those  standards require that we plan and
perform  the  audit  to  obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements  are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test  basis,  evidence  supporting  the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant  estimates  made  by  management,  as well as evaluating the overall
financial  statement  presentation.  We  believe  that  our  audits  provide  a
reasonable  basis  for  our  opinion.

In  our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly,  in  all  material respects, the financial position of the Company as of
December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and cash flows for
the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in  the  United  States  of  America.

The  accompanying  consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the
consolidated  financial  statements,  the  Company has incurred operating losses
since  its  inception  and requires additional financing to continue operations.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue
as  a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are described
in  Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
relating  to  the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or
the  amount and classification of liabilities that may result should the Company
be  unable  to  continue  as  a  going  concern.


                                       GOOD SWARTZ BROWN & BERNS LLP.


Los Angeles, California
April 1, 2002
                                      F-1

<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                 CYPOST CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                     CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                                     DECEMBER 31, 2001 AND 2000


                                                                            2001           2000
                                                                        -------------  -------------
<S>                                                                     <C>            <C>
ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS
   CASH                                                                 $     73,124   $    250,631
   ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET OF ALLOWANCE FOR
     DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS of $76,405 & $71,368, RESPECTIVELY                    138,311        173,207
   INSURANCE PROCEEDS RECEIVABLE                                                   -         58,488
   PREPAID EXPENSES                                                           45,982        134,617
   NOTE RECEIVABLE & ACCRUED INTEREST                                         57,199              -
                                                                        -------------  -------------

   TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS                                                      314,616        616,943

 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET OF ACCUMULATED
   DEPRECIATION                                                              501,565        751,020
 GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES, NET OF
   ACCUMULATED AMORTIZATION of $4,134,376 & $2,302,528,  RESPECTIVELY      1,361,167      3,193,015
 DEPOSITS                                                                     92,609        115,917
 OTHER ASSETS                                                                  8,483          5,371
                                                                        -------------  -------------

                                                                        $  2,278,440   $  4,682,266
                                                                        =============  =============

 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 CURRENT LIABILITIES
   ACCOUNTS PAYABLE & ACCRUED LIABILITIES                                  1,275,586      1,026,666
   LOANS                                                                           -      2,110,000
   DEFERRED REVENUE                                                          448,548        640,483
                                                                        -------------  -------------

   TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES                                               1,724,134      3,777,149
                                                                        -------------  -------------

 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 11)

 STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
   SHARE CAPITAL
        AUTHORIZED
     5,000,000 PREFERRED STOCK WITH A PAR VALUE OF $.001
     30,000,000 COMMON STOCK WITH A PAR VAUE OF $.001

        ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING
     PREFERRED STOCK - NONE                                                        -              -
     COMMON STOCK 23,189,493 - 2001, 21,556,993 - 2000, RESPECTIVELY          23,190         21,557
   PAID-IN CAPITAL                                                        14,289,686     14,047,544
   ACCUMULATED DEFICIT                                                   (13,767,358)   (13,197,006)
   CURRENCY TRANSLATION ADJUSTMENT                                             8,788         33,022
                                                                        -------------  -------------

   TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY                                                554,306        905,117
                                                                        -------------  -------------

                                                                        $  2,278,440   $  4,682,266
                                                                        =============  =============
</TABLE>

  The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.


                                      F-2
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       CYPOST CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                 FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 AND 2000


                                                    2001          2000
                                                ------------  ------------

<S>                                             <C>           <C>
REVENUE                                         $ 3,706,386   $ 4,595,823

DIRECT COSTS                                      1,858,619     2,138,456
                                                ------------  ------------

                                                  1,847,767     2,457,367
                                                ------------  ------------
EXPENSES
  SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE             2,655,940     3,599,690
  AMORTIZATION AND DEPRECIATION                   2,151,090     2,859,519
                                                ------------  ------------

                                                  4,807,030     6,459,209
                                                ------------  ------------

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS                             (2,959,263)   (4,001,842)
                                                ------------  ------------

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

  SECTION 16(b) SETTLEMENT                        2,498,449             -

  NET RECOVERY FROM FIRE INSURANCE                   11,449       228,966

  GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTMENT OF CYPOST KK                 -        36,202

  LOSS ON ABANDONMENT OF PLAYA OPERATIONS                 -    (2,201,253)

  IMPAIRMENT LOSS OF LONG LIVED ASSETS               (3,052)     (128,726)

  INTEREST EXPENSE, NET                            (117,935)   (2,113,570)
                                                ------------  ------------

  TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)                    2,388,911    (4,178,381)
                                                ------------  ------------

MINORITY INTEREST                                         -      (108,656)
                                                ------------  ------------

NET LOSS                                        $  (570,352)  $(8,288,879)
                                                ============  ============

BASIC LOSS PER SHARE                            $     (0.03)  $     (0.39)
                                                ============  ============

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING    21,719,418    21,182,796
                                                ============  ============
</TABLE>

  The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.


                                       F-3
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  CYPOST CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                             FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 AND 2000


                                                                                 2001          2000
                                                                             ------------  ------------
<S>                                                                          <C>           <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
  NET LOSS                                                                   $  (570,352)  $(8,288,879)
  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used by
      operating activities:
    Amortization and depreciation                                              2,151,090     2,859,519
    Bad debt expense                                                              38,615        60,866
    Section 16b settlement                                                    (2,498,449)            -
    Interest (income) expense                                                    120,294     1,962,500
    Net recovery from fire insurance                                             (11,449)     (228,966)
    Consulting fees offsetting note receivable                                    52,373             -
    Gain on sale of investment on CyPost KK                                            -       (36,202)
    Minority interest                                                                  -       108,656
    Loss on abandonment of Playa operations                                            -     2,201,253
    Impairment loss of long-live assets                                            3,052       128,726
    Casualty loss on equipment                                                         -         7,901
    Fair value of stock issued for services                                      243,775       332,353
    Currency translation adjustments on loss on abandonment                            -        60,501

  Changes in assets and liabilities
    Accounts receivable                                                           (3,719)         (885)
    Insurance receivable                                                          58,488       (58,488)
    Prepaid Expenses                                                              88,635        38,702
    Deposits                                                                      23,308      (115,917)
    Other assets                                                                  (3,114)       64,018
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities                                     407,503       (35,160)
    Deferred revenue                                                            (191,935)       14,340
                                                                             ------------  ------------
NET CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES                                            (91,885)     (925,162)
                                                                             ------------  ------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
  Acquisition of business                                                              -      (592,454)
  Purchase of property and equipment                                             (72,837)     (338,602)
  Investment in software development                                                   -       (87,431)
  Proceeds from sale of investment in CyPost KK                                        -       220,000
  Gross proceeds received from insurance company                                  14,105       306,344
  Payment of insurance related claims                                             (2,656)      (77,378)
                                                                             ------------  ------------
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES                                            (61,388)     (569,521)
                                                                             ------------  ------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
  Loan proceeds                                                                        -     1,413,589
  Loan repayment                                                                       -      (100,000)
                                                                             ------------  ------------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES                                              -     1,313,589
                                                                             ------------  ------------

EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES                                                  (24,234)       15,946
NET DECREASE IN CASH                                                            (177,507)     (165,148)
CASH, BEGINNING OF YEAR                                                          250,631       415,779
                                                                             ------------  ------------
CASH, END OF YEAR                                                            $    73,124   $   250,631
                                                                             ============  ============

NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS
  Common Stock issued for services and acquisitions                          $   243,775   $   332,353

  In lieu of collecting funds on the 16b settlement, the Company
  had related debt and all accrued interest cancelled totalling $2,389,238.
  The Company also recorded a note receivable for $109,211.

OTHER CASH INFORMATION
   Interest paid                                                             $         -   $    29,059
                                                                             ============  ============

   Taxes paid                                                                $         -   $         -
                                                                             ============  ============
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.


                                      F-4
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          CYPOST CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
                                     FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 AND 2000


                                                                   ADDITIONAL                CUMMULATIVE
                                               COMMON STOCK          PAID-IN                 TRANSLATION
                                                  NUMBER    AMOUNT   CAPITAL      DEFICIT     ADJUSTMENT      TOTAL
                                                ----------  ------  ----------  ------------  -----------  ------------
<S>                                             <C>         <C>     <C>         <C>           <C>          <C>
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 1999                      20,246,480  20,246   8,814,002   (4,908,127)      17,076     3,943,197
   Issued for acquisition of Internet Arena         80,558      81     239,919                                 240,000
   Issued for acquisition of Playa Corporation     785,455     785   2,699,215                               2,700,000
   Issued for services/debt                         26,500      27      92,723                                  92,750
   Issued for services                             369,500     370     212,196                                 212,566
   Issued for services                              48,500      48      26,989                                  27,037
   Beneficial conversion feature on loans                            1,962,500                               1,962,500
   Cummulative translation adjustment                                                             15,946        15,946
   Net loss                                                                      (8,288,879)                (8,288,879)
                                                ----------  ------  ----------  ------------  -----------  ------------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2000                      21,556,993  21,557  14,047,544  (13,197,006)      33,022       905,117
   Issued for services                           1,000,000   1,000      84,000                                  85,000
   Issued for services                             400,000     400      99,600                                 100,000
   Issued for services                             230,000     230      57,270                                  57,500
   Issued for services                               2,500       3       1,272                                   1,275
  Cummulative translation adjustment                                                             (24,234)      (24,234)
   Net loss                                                                        (570,352)                  (570,352)
                                                ----------  ------  ----------  ------------  -----------  ------------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 30, 2001                      23,189,493  23,190  14,289,686  (13,767,358)       8,788   $   554,306
                                                ==========  ======  ==========  ============  ===========  ============
</TABLE>

  The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.


                                       F-5
<PAGE>
                       CYPOST CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                     YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 AND 2000

1.   NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND GOING CONCERN

     CyPost Corporation ("CyPost") was incorporated on September 5, 1997 under
the laws of the State of Delaware and its principal executive offices are
located in Vancouver, Canada. CyPost is engaged in the business of providing
Internet connection services for business and personal use. Previously the
Company was also involved in developing certain software products using
encryption components to enhance user security and convenience for communication
across digital networks, and in securing local data storage equipment, which
activities the Company no longer currently pursues. The Company emerged from the
development stage in 1999 and commenced revenue generating activities. The term
"Company" refers to CyPost and its consolidated subsidiaries.

     The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on
the basis of accounting principles applicable to a "going concern", which assume
that the Company will continue in operation for at least one year and will be
able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of
operations.

     Several conditions and events cast doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a  "going concern".  The Company has incurred net losses of
approximately $13.8 million for the period from inception September 5, 1997 to
December 31, 2001, has a working capital deficiency at December 31, 2001 of
approximately $1.41 million, and requires additional financing for its business
operations.

     The Company's future capital requirements will depend on numerous factors
including, but not limited to, whether the Company wishes to recommence software
development activities, and market penetration of and profitable operations from
its Internet connection services.  The Company does not believe that bank
borrowings are available under present circumstances, and there can be no
assurance that any financing could be obtained from other sources. Even if
funding were available, it might be available only on terms which would not be
favorable to the Company or which management would not find acceptable.
Meanwhile, the management is working on attaining cost and efficiency synergies
by consolidating the operations of the businesses acquired.

     These financial statements do not reflect adjustments that would be
necessary if the Company was unable to continue as a "going concern".  While
management believes that the actions already taken or planned, as described
above, will mitigate the adverse conditions and events which raise doubt about
the validity of the "going concern" assumption used in preparing these financial
statements, there can be no assurance that these actions will be successful.


                                      F-6
<PAGE>
     If the Company were unable to continue as a  "going concern", then
substantial adjustments would be necessary to the carrying values of assets, the
reported amounts of its liabilities, the reported revenues and expenses, and the
balance sheet classifications used.

2.   SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

     CONSOLIDATION

     The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CyPost
Corporation and its subsidiaries.  The subsidiaries include, NetroverUSA Online
Inc. (formerly known as ePost Innovations Inc.see Canada Post Litigation below),
NetRover Inc., NetRover Office Inc., Hermes Net Solutions Inc., and
Intouch.Internet Inc. Connect Northwest and Internet Arena are DBA of CyPost
Corporation. In 2000, the subsidiaries also included CyPost KK and Playa
Corporation. All the principal subsidiaries, except CyPost KK for a certain
period of time during 2000, are wholly owned. Later in 2000, the Company sold
its investment in CyPost KK and abandoned its investment in Playa Corporation.
All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.

     FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION

     The functional currency of the Company is U.S. dollars. Balance sheet
accounts of international self-sustaining subsidiaries, principally Canadian,
are translated at the current exchange rate as of the balance sheet date. Income
statement items are translated at average exchange rates during the period. The
resulting translation adjustment is recorded as a separate component of
stockholders' equity. Dollar values in this consolidated financial statements
are expressed in U.S. Dollars, unless indicated otherwise. On December 31, 2001
one Canadian Dollar (Cdn) was exchangeable for .62870 U.S. Dollars.

     USE OF ESTIMATES

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.

     FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

     The Company has, where practicable, estimated the fair value of financial
instruments based on quoted market prices or valuation techniques such as
present value of estimated future cash flows.  These fair value amounts may be


                                      F-7
<PAGE>
significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and
estimates of cash flow.  Accordingly, the estimates are not necessarily
indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange.
Where these estimates approximate carrying value, no separate disclosure of fair
value is shown.

     PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

     Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives using the straight-line
method over a period of three to five years.  Maintenance and repairs are
charged against operations and betterments are capitalized.

     At the end of 2001, the management of the Company assessed the useful life
of these assets and determined that some of the assets were impaired. Therefore
the Company has written off the net book value of these assets in the amount of
$3,052.

     EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

     Earnings (loss) per share have been computed in accordance with SFAS 128.
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss)
attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the respective periods.  Diluted earnings (loss) per
share is computed similarly, but also gives effect to the impact that
convertible securities, such as warrants, if dilutive, would have on net
earnings (loss) and average common shares outstanding if converted at the
beginning of the year. The effect of potential common shares such as warrants
would be antidilutive in each of the periods presented in these financial
statements, and accordingly, are not presented.


     REVENUE RECOGNITION AND DEFERRED REVENUE

     The Company's primary source of operating revenue is earned from Internet
connection services. For contracts which exceed one month, revenue is recognized
on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract as services are provided.
Revenues applicable to future periods are classified as deferred revenue.

     DIRECT COSTS

     Direct costs consist of telecommunications charges in respect to providing
Internet connection services to customers. These costs are expensed as incurred.

     ADVERTISING COSTS

     Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.


                                      F-8
<PAGE>
     SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS

     SFAS No.  86,  "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be
Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed", and Statement of Position 98-1 (SOP 98-1),
"Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for
Internal Use", provide guidance over accounting for computer software developed
or obtained for internal use including the requirement to capitalize specified
costs and amortization of such costs. The capitalization of software development
costs begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility of the product,
which the Company has defined as the completion of beta testing of a working
product. The establishment of technological feasibility and the ongoing
assessment of the recoverability of these costs require considerable judgment by
management with respect to certain external factors, including, but not limited
to, anticipated future gross product revenue, estimated economic life and
changes in software and hardware technology. Software developments costs are
amortized on the straight-line method over the estimated economic life of the
product of three years.

During 2000, the Company capitalized $87,431 of software development costs and
amortized $98,240 of these costs including those capitalized in prior years.
At the end of 2000, the management of the Company assessed the recoverability
of the Company's software products assets and determined that this asset was
impaired. Therefore, the Company has written off the net book value of this
asset in the amount of $128,726.

     GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

     Intangible assets consist primarily of customer lists and goodwill related
to acquisitions accounted for under the purchase method of accounting.
Amortization of these purchased intangibles is provided on the straight-line
basis over the respective useful lives of the intangible assets which is
estimated to be three years.

     IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

     Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is recognized when the aggregate of estimated future cash
inflows less estimated future cash outflows, to be generated by an asset are
less than the asset's carrying value. Future cash inflows include an estimate of
the proceeds from eventual disposition. For purposes of this comparison,
estimated future cash flows are determined without reference to their discounted
present value. If the sum of undiscounted estimated future cash inflows is equal
to or greater than the asset's carrying value, impairment does not exist. If,
however, expected future cash inflows are less than carrying value, a loss on
impairment should be recorded. Such a loss is measured as the excess of the
asset's carrying value over its fair value. Fair value of an asset is the amount
at which an asset could be bought or sold in a current transaction between a


                                      F-9
<PAGE>
willing buyer and seller other than in a forced or liquidation sale. The Company
measures an impairment loss by comparing the fair value of the asset to its
carrying amount. Fair value of an asset is calculated as the present value of
expected future cash flows.

     INCOME TAXES

     The Company computes income taxes using the asset and liability method,
under which deferred income taxes are provided for the temporary differences
between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company's assets
and liabilities.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
currently enacted tax rates that are expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled.  A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred
tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.

     STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

     SFAS No.  123,  "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", encourages, but
does not require, companies to record compensation cost for stock-based employee
compensation under a fair value based method.  Alternatively, stock-based
employee compensation can be accounted for under APB No.  25, "Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees", under which no compensation is normally recorded if
the issue price is equivalent to the fair market value.

     The Company has elected to follow the accounting provisions of APB No. 25
to account for its stock based employee compensation, and to furnish the pro
forma disclosures required under SFAS No.123. For stock issued to non-employees,
the Company records the fair value of the equity granted in compliance with SFAS
No.123.

     PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

     SFAS No.  132,  "Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits, an amendment of FASB Statements No.  87, 88 and 106",
revises employers' disclosures about pension and other postretirement benefit
plans.  It does not change the measurement or recognition of those plans.  It
standardizes the disclosure requirements for pension and other postretirement
benefits to the extent practicable, requires additional information on changes
in benefit obligations and fair values of plan assets that will facilitate
financial analysis, and eliminates certain disclosures that are no longer
considered useful.

     The Company does not offer any pension or other postretirement benefits.

     RECLASSIFICATION


                                      F-10
<PAGE>
     Certain 2000 balances have been reclassified to conform to the current
year's presentation.

     RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

     In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS 141). SFAS
141 addresses financial accounting and reporting for business combinations and
supersedes APB Opinion No. 16, Business Combinations, and FASB Statement No. 38,
Accounting for Preacquisition Contingencies of Purchased Enterprises.  All
business combinations in the scope to this Statement are to be accounted for
using one method, the purchase method. The provisions of this Statement apply to
all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. The Company will adopt
SFAS 141 beginning January 1, 2002 and does not expect a material impact on the
results of operations or financial position.

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS 142). SFAS 142 addresses financial accounting and reporting for acquired
goodwill and other intangible assets and supersedes APB Opinion No. 17,
Intangible Assets. Under the new rules, goodwill and intangible assets that have
indefinite useful lives will not be amortized but rather will be tested at least
annually for impairment. Intangible assets that have finite useful lives will
continue to be amortized over their useful lives, but without the constraint of
an arbitrary ceiling. The provisions of this Statement are required to be
applied starting with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The
Company will adopt SFAS 142 beginning January 1, 2002 and has not determined the
impact on its results of operations or financial position.

In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No.144, Accounting for the Impairment of Disposal
of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144). SFAS 144 addresses financial accounting and
reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assts. This Statement
supersedes FASB Statement No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long-lived Assets to Be Disposed Of, and the accounting and
reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of
Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and
Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions, for
the disposal of a segment of a business (as previously defined in that Opinion).
Under SFAS 144, discontinued operations are no longer measured on a net
realizable value basis, and future operating losses are no longer recognized
before they occur. The provisions of this Statement are effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The
Company will adopt SFAS 144 beginning January 1, 2002 and does not expect a
material impact on its results of operations or financial position.

3.   ACQUISITIONS


                                      F-11
<PAGE>
     During 2000, the Company completed certain acquisitions of business and
assets.  These acquisitions are accounted for using the purchase method, and
accordingly, these consolidated financial statements include the results of
operations from the date of acquisition of each respective business.

     PLAYA CORPORATION

     On February 23, 2000, the Company purchased all the shares of Playa
Corporation (a Japan company) for $3,000,000. The consideration paid by the
Company consisted of cash in the amount of $300,000 and 785,455 shares of the
Company's common stock valued at $2,700,000.  Due to a clerical error
subsequently discovered, the number of shares originally calculated to be
issued, and actually issued to the seller, was incorrectly determined to be
771,426.  Therefore, in January 2001, the Company issued an additional 14,029
shares of its common stock to the seller to account for the difference.  For
purposes of financial statement presentation, all 785,455 shares of the
Company's common stock were deemed issued as of February 23, 2000.

     The acquisition has been accounted for by the purchase method of
accounting.  The purchase included goodwill and other intangibles of $3,665,778
which will be amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life
of three years. Due to a number of factors, including without limitation, weak
performance by Playa, the difficulties of operating one small Japanese company
following the sale by the Company of CyPost KK, a former subsidiary of the
Company, and the Company's own liquidity needs, in the fourth quarter 2000, the
Company's management decided to abandon the business of Playa.  In connection
therewith, the Company has written off the assets of Playa in the net amount of
$2,201,253 which is reflected as "Loss on abandonment of Playa operations",
consisting of approximately $3,067,065 in actual assets, including the goodwill
and approximately $865,812 of liabilities owed by Playa to various parties for
which the Company does not believe it is liable. The year ending December 31,
2000 consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of
Playa for the period from February 24, 2000 to September 30, 2000.
CYPOST KK

     On March 17, 2000, the Company purchased 400 shares of CyPost KK,
representing 100% of the then issued and outstanding shares, for $188,870
(20,000,000 Yen), and transferred 180 of such shares, or 45% of the then issued
and outstanding shares, to certain members of the management of CyPost KK in
consideration of their future effort to raise additional capital for CyPost KK.

     On May 5, 2000, the Company purchased an additional 400 shares of CyPost KK
from CyPost KK for $184,915 (20,000,000 Yen). The Company funded this purchase
$106,326 (11,500,000 Yen) from its own funds (with respect to 230 shares) and
$78,589 (8,500,000 Yen) in the form of a loan from these certain members of
CyPost KK management to the Company (with respect to the remaining 170 shares).
Of the 400 shares purchased by the Company on such date, the Company transferred
180 shares to these individuals in consideration of their future effort to raise


                                      F-12
<PAGE>
additional capital for CyPost KK. The transferred shares have been valued at the
Company's cost. As a result of acquiring a net additional 220 shares of CyPost
KK, the Company maintained its 55% ownership in CyPost KK.

     On May 22, 2000, Access Media International, a company that is not
affiliated with the Company, purchased 200 shares of CyPost KK from CyPost KK
for 10,000,000 Yen, resulting in a reduction of the Company's interest in CyPost
KK to 44%.

     All 360 shares of CyPost KK stock which were transferred by the Company to
these individuals were specifically intended to compensate them solely with
respect to equity financing activities and were contingent upon their ability to
raise additional equity financing in Japan for CyPost KK. Because these
individuals were not able to raise such additional financing, no portion of the
360 shares were earned.

     In part because these individuals were ultimately not able to arrange such
financing, the Company decided to sell its entire interest in CyPost KK.  On
July 12, 2000, the Company sold all 630 shares it then owned in CyPost KK to
Access Media International for $220,000, resulting in a gain of $36,202.

     In connection with the sale by the Company of its entire interest in CyPost
KK to Access Media International, on July 3, 2000 these certain members of
CyPost KK management (i) returned to the Company 190 shares of the CyPost KK
stock that the Company had previously transferred to them, consisting of the 180
shares transferred to them by the Company in March 2000 and 10 shares
transferred to them by the Company in May 2000; (ii) canceled the $78,589 loans
made by them to the Company in May 2000 to purchase 170 of the shares; and (iii)
retained those 170 shares purchased by the Company, for which the purchase price
was $78,589.

     Despite the fact that there was a brief period of time during which the
Company owned less than a majority of the voting shares of CyPost KK (May 22,
2000 through July 3, 2000), the Company owned a majority interest for most of
the period from formation of CyPost KK through June 30, 2000 and therefore had
the ability to control its operations.  The Company has reflected the amounts of
revenue, cost of revenue and expenses on a consolidated basis for the entire
period of ownership.  Had the Company reflected the amounts of revenue, cost of
revenue and expenses on a consolidated basis for the period from April 1, 2000
through May 22, 2000 and an equity method for the period from May 22, 2000
through June 30, 2000, the impact on the consolidated financial statements would
not have been material.

     During its period of ownership of CyPost KK, the Company loaned CyPost KK
$64,764 and CyPost KK paid certain expenses on behalf of the Company in the
amount of $25,542, leaving a balance of $39,222 owed by CyPost KK to the Company
at the time of sale. In connection with the sale by the Company of all of its
interest in CyPost KK, the Company canceled the net outstanding balance of
$39,222 in loans made by the Company to CyPost KK and CyPost KK canceled $39,222
in loans made by CyPost KK to Playa Corporation ("Playa"). At September 30,


                                      F-13
<PAGE>
2000, there was a balance of $168,062 owed by Playa to CyPost KK. This loan
bears interest at 5.5% per annum and is payable in 60 monthly installments
beginning January 15, 2001. This loan balance has been written off in connection
with the abandonment of Playa's business. See "Acquisition of Playa".

4.   PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS

     Property and equipment consist of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   2001         2000
                                -----------  -----------
<S>                             <C>          <C>
Office furniture                $   75,795   $  194,436
Leasehold improvement               21,080       14,360
Computer hardware and software   1,329,945    1,144,234
                                -----------  -----------
                                 1,426,820    1,353,030
Less accumulated depreciation     (925,254)    (602,010)
                                -----------  -----------
                                $  501,566   $  751,020
                                ===========  ===========
</TABLE>

The depreciation expense charged to the operations for the years ended December
31, 2001 and 2000 was $319,242 and $179,263, respectively.

5.   GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES

     Goodwill and other intangibles consist of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   2001          2000
                               ------------  ------------
<S>                            <C>           <C>
Customer lists                 $ 3,663,000   $ 3,663,000
Goodwill                         1,832,543     1,832,543
                               ------------  ------------
                                 5,495,543     5,495,543
Less accumulated amortization   (4,134,376)   (2,302,528)
                               ------------  ------------
                               $ 1,361,167   $ 3,193,015
                               ============  ============
</TABLE>

The amortization expense charged to the operations for the years ended December
31, 2001 and 2000 was $1,831,848 and $2,582,016, respectively.


6.   LOANS

Loans as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 consist of:


                                      F-14
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                               2001      2000
                               -----  ----------
<S>                            <C>    <C>
Blue Heron Venture Fund, Ltd.  $   0  $2,085,000
Pacific Gate Capital               0      25,000
                               -----  ----------
                               $   0  $2,110,000
                               =====  ==========
</TABLE>

     In 2000, loans from Blue Heron Venture Fund, Ltd were pursuant to two
promissory note agreements ($2,000,000 and $10,000,000 loan facilities). The
loans were unsecured, bore interest at 8% per annum, and the principal and
accrued interest were due on demand. The lender had the option to withdraw its
offer to lend at any time and to convert the loans into shares of common stock
of the Company.

     At the commitment date of each of the promissory notes, the conversion
price was less than the fair value of the common stock, hence a beneficial
conversion feature is attributable to these convertible notes. The amount of
this beneficial conversion feature is $1,962,500 and has been recorded as
interest expense and additional paid-in-capital for the year ended December 31,
2000.

     The loan from Pacific Gate in the aggregate principal amount of $25000 was
unsecured, bore interest of 8% per annum, and the principal and accrued interest
were due on demand.

     On  June  18,  2001  at  the request of Blue Heron Venture Fund, Ltd. (Blue
Heron),  Blue  Heron  Notes  in  the  aggregate  principal  amount of $2,085,000
were  cancelled  and  on  June  19,  2001  new promissory notes (the "Blue Heron
Shareholder  Notes")  in  the  aggregate  principal  amount  of  $2,319,788 were
issued  to  the  shareholders  of  Blue  Heron  and  Blue  Heron's fund manager,
Monet  Management  Group  Ltd.  The  principal  amount  of  the  Blue  Heron
Shareholder  Notes  was  comprised  of  the  $2,085,000  principal amount of the
Blue  Heron  Notes  and  the  $234,788  in  interest due on the Blue Heron Notes
at  the  time  of  cancellation.  The  Blue  Heron  Shareholder  Notes  were
unsecured  and  were  payable  on  demand. $2,085,000 in principal amount of the
Blue  Heron  Shareholder  Notes  bore  interest  at 8% per annum. The balance of
the  Blue  Heron  Shareholder  Notes  did  not  provide  for  the  payment  of
interest.

     On  September 20, 2001 the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement (the
"Settlement  Agreement")  with  Kelly  Shane  Montalban with regard to a lawsuit
it  had  instituted  against  him  on  June  15,  2001  in  the  United  States
District  Court  for  the  Southern  District  of  New  York seeking recovery of
short  swing  profits  realized  by  Mr.  Montalban  and  other  persons  whose
purchases  and  sales  of  Company  common  stock  were  attributed  to  Mr.
Montalban  in  violation  of  Section  16(b)]  of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934,  as  amended  (see  Shane  Montalban  Litigation  below).  Pursuant to the
Settlement  Agreement,  Mr.  Montalban  paid  the  Company  an  aggregate  of
approximately  $2,498,449  (the  "Recovery  Amount"),  which  amount represented


                                      F-15
<PAGE>
recovery  in  full  of  Mr.  Montalban's  short  swing  profits.  He  did  so by
delivering  to  the  Company  for  cancellation  (1)  the Blue Heron Shareholder
Notes  in  the  aggregate  principal  amount of $2,319,788, which notes had been
previously  purchased  by  or  assigned  to  Mr.  Montalban;  (2)  the  accrued
interest  of  $42,384  due  on  the  principal  portion  of  the  Blue  Heron
Shareholder  Notes  at  the  time  of  cancellation;  (3) 8% demand notes of the
Company  dated  August  25,  2000  and  September 11, 2000, respectively, in the
aggregate  principal  amount  of  $25,000  issued  to  Pacific  Gate  Capital
Corporation,  a  corporation  owned  by  Mr.  Montalban  (the  "Pacific  Gate
Capital  Notes");  and  (4)  the  accrued  interest  of  $2,066  due  on  the
principal  portion  of  the  Pacific  Gate  Capital  Notes  at  the  time  of
cancellation.  The  balance  of  the  Recovery  Amount  was  paid  by  Mr.
Montalban's  issuance  to  the  Company  of a five (5) year, 5% promissory note,
dated  September  20,  2001,  in  the  principal  amount  of  $109,211.  In
consideration  of  the  execution  of  the  Settlement  Agreement and payment of
the  Recovery  Amount, on October 9, 2001 the Company voluntarily dismissed
its  action.

     On October 1, 2001 the Company entered into a consulting agreement with
Pacific Gate Capital Corporation for a one year period in the amount of $27,750
minimum per month for providing certain services to the Company. This agreement
was subsequently cancelled. In the year 2001 the consulting payments reduced the
principal amount owing by Mr. Montalban in the amount of $109,211 by $53,250.

     The  Company  has  accrued  interest of $1,237 for the period September 20
to    December  31,  2001.

7.   SHARE CAPITAL

     AUTHORIZED STOCK

     The Company is authorized to issue:

     (a) 30,000,000 shares of common stock at a par value of $0.001 per share.

     (b) 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock at a par value of $.001 per share.

     The Board of Directors of the Company has the authority, without further
action by the holders of the outstanding shares of common stock, to issue shares
of preferred stock from time to time in one or more classes or series, to fix
the number of shares constituting any class or series and the stated value, if
different from the par value, and to fix the terms of any such series or class,
including dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion or exchange rights, voting
rights, rights and terms of redemption (including sinking fund  provisions), the
redemption price and the liquidation  preference of such class or series. The
designations, rights and preferences of any shares of preferred stock would be


                                      F-16
<PAGE>
set forth in a Certificate of Designation which would be filed with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.


ISSUANCE OF SHARES
     On March 2, 2000, the Company issued 26,500 shares of its commons stock in
an aggregate amount of $92,750 at the closing price of $3.50 per share on
February 29, 2000, to Kaplan, Gottbetter and Levenson, as payment of services
accrued at December 31, 1999 and through February 29, 2000.

     On March 13, 2000, the Company issued 80,558 shares of its common stock at
the closing price of $2.98 on July 12, 1999 (as adjusted for a 3-for-2 stock
split), the date of signing the Letter of Intent, to the owners of Internet
Arena, Inc., as payment for the balance due in the amount of $240,000 in
connection with the Company's acquisition of that entity.

     On June 8, 2000, the Company issued 785,455 shares of its common stock to
the selling stockholders of Playa as partial payment of the purchase price
$3,000,000 in connection with the Company's acquisition of that company. See
Note 3 of this document.

     On August 1, 2000, the Company issued an aggregate 129,500 shares of its
common stock in an aggregate amount of $76,897 to seven employees at the closing
price of $0.5938 per share on July 17, 2000 in consideration for their providing
certain services to the Company from June 16, 2000 through July 15, 2000.
Subsequently 10,000 of these shares were canceled. For purposes of financial
statement presentation, those shares were deemed canceled as of October 1, 2000.

     On August 1, 2000, the Company issued 75,000 shares of its common stock in
an aggregate amount of $133,605 to each of the Company's three directors at the
closing price of $0.5938 on July 17, 2000 in consideration for their providing
certain services to the Company from June 16 through July 15, 2000.

     On August 17, 2000, the Company issued an aggregate 43,500 shares of its
common stock in an aggregate amount of $25,787 to six people at the closing
price of $0.5938 per share on July 25, 2000 in consideration for their providing
consulting work to the Company from April 1, 2000 through June 30, 2000.

     On October 1, 2000, the Company accrued the issuance of an aggregate 27,500
shares of its common stock in an aggregate amount of $8,800 to three employees
and one consultant at the closing price of $0.32 per share in consideration for
their providing certain services to the Company. Subsequently in the first
quarter 2001, 25,000 of these shares were issued and 2,500 shares were issued in
the second quarter 2001. For purposes of financial statement presentation, all
shares were deemed issued as of October 1, 2000.


                                      F-17
<PAGE>
     On December 29, 2000, the Company accrued the issuance of 2,500 shares of
its common stock in an aggregate amount of $450 to a consultant at the closing
price of $0.18 per share in consideration for his providing certain services to
the Company. As of December 31, 2000, these shares were not been issued, however
for purposes of financial statement presentation, all shares were deemed issued
as of December 29, 2000. These shares were issued in 2001

     On March 31, 2001, the Company reflected the issuance of 2,500 shares of
its common stock in an aggregate amount of $1,275 to one consultant at the
closing price of $0.51 per share in consideration for his providing certain
services to the Company. These shares were issued on May 16, 2001.

     On November 16, 2001, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its common
stock in an aggregate amount of $85,000 to Adam Gottbetter at the closing price
of $0.085 per share in consideration for his providing legal services to the
Company.

     On December 11, 2001, the Company issued 400,000 shares of its common stock
in an aggregate amount of $100,000 to Martin and Associates at the closing price
of $0.25 per share in consideration of them providing legal services to the
Company.

     On December 11, 2001, the Company issued 230,000 shares of its common stock
in an aggregate amount of $57,500 to Andrew Stack, LLP at the closing price of
$0.25 per share in consideration of them providing legal services to the
Company.

     STOCK OPTIONS

     On January 10, 2001, the Company issued an option to purchase 1,000,000
shares of the Company's common stock to Robert Adams, who, at such time, was
serving as President, Chief Operating Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the
Company. On that date, the Company also issued an option to purchase 125,000
shares of the Company's common stock to Tami Allan, who, at that time was
serving as Vice President of North American Operations of the Company.  The
exercise price of each option is $.10 per share and vests over time. The options
were issued pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in Section
4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), for
transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. Mr. Adams and Ms.
Allan are no longer employees of the Company. On December 10, 2001, Mr. Adams
gave notice to the Company indicating that he wished to exercise 2,500 options
pursuant to the non-qualified stock option agreement. On January 2002 2,500
shares were issued to  Mr. Adams. Unvested options for Mr. Adams in the amount
of 500,000 have been cancelled.

     Information relative to stock option activity is as follows (in thousands);

     The following table summarized information concerning activity associated
with the various option grants:


                                      F-18
<PAGE>
                                                Options  Exerisable Price
                                                -------  ----------------

Options outstanding at December 31, 1999              -   $            -

Options granted                                       -                -
Options exercised                                     -                -
Options cancelled                                     -                -
                                                -------  ----------------

Options outstanding at December 31, 2000              -   $            -

Options granted                                   1,125             0.10
Options exercised                                     3             0.10
Options cancelled                                  (630)            0.10
                                                -------  ----------------

Options outstanding at December 31, 2001            498   $         0.10
                                                =======  ================

All of the outstanding options at December 31, 2001 are exercisable.

     The Company applies APB No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees",
and related interpretations in accounting for its plan. Accordingly, no
compensation expense has been recognized for its stock-based compensation plan
other than for the stock options granted to consultants. Had compensation cost
for the Company's other options granted been determined based upon the fair
value at the grant date for awards under this plan been consistent with the
methodology prescribed under SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation", the Company's net loss and net loss per share would have been
increased to the pro forma amounts indicated below

Net loss as reported                       $   (570,352)

Proforma net loss                              (605,352)

Basic net loss per share as reported              (0.03)

Proforma net loss                                 (0.03)

     For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the
options are amortized over the options' vesting period.

     The Black-Scholes option valuation modes was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions
and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the
input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price
volatility. Because of the Company's options have characteristics significantly
different from those of  traded options, and because changes in the subjective
input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in the opinion
of management, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single
measure of the fair value of its option.


                                      F-19
<PAGE>
     The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model using a dividend yield of 0% and the
following weighted average assumptions:

Expected stock price volatility            239%

Risk free interest rate                      4%

Expected lives (in years)                    1

8.   INCOME TAXES

     At December 31, 2001 and 2000, the Company has net operating loss carry
forwards for income tax purposes of approximately $10,965,000 and $10,680,000,
respectively which are available to offset future taxable income.  The amount
and ultimate realization is dependant, in part, upon the tax laws in effect, the
future earnings of the Company, and other future events, the effects of which
cannot be determined. Because of the uncertainty surrounding the realization of
the loss carry forwards the Company has established a valuation allowance equal
to the amount of the tax effect of the loss carry forward and, therefore no
deferred tax asset has been recognized for the loss.

The components of the deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 are as
follows:

                                            2001          2000
                                        ------------  ------------
Deferred Tax Assets                     $ 3,278,100   $ 3,631,200
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance   (3,728,100)   (3,631,200)
                                        ------------  ------------
                                        $         -   $         -
                                        ============  ============

The current year income tax benefit consists of:


                                    2001              2000
                               ---------------  -----------------
Current                        $                $
Deferred                              (96,900)        (2,371,200)
                               ---------------  -----------------
                                (96,900)    -    (2,371,200)   -
                               ---------------  -----------------
Change in Valuation Allowance          96,900          2,371,200
                               ---------------  -----------------

                               $            -   $              -
                               ===============  =================


                                      F-20
<PAGE>
9.   NET PROCEEDS FROM FIRE LOSS

     On January 31, 2000, the Company suffered a fire loss at its Etobicoke
(suburban Toronto), Ontario facility. The loss was completely covered by
insurance. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, the Company
received net proceeds from fire insurance in the amount of $11,449 and
$228,966,respectively.

10.       RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

     The Company has obtained most of its financing through Blue Heron Venture
Fund Ltd. ("Blue Heron"), a corporation in which Kelly Shane Montalban may be
deemed to have an "indirect pecuniary" interest as a result of his status as
fund manager for Blue Heron. Blue Heron and Mr. Montalban are principal
stockholders of the Company. Blue Heron may be deemed to be an affiliate of
Pacific Gate, another of the Company's lenders, in which Mr. Montalban is the
sole stockholder, sole director and sole officer. Blue Heron loans were
unsecured and were convertible into Common Stock at the lender's option, in
which case Blue Heron would waive its right to be paid interest.  The balance of
these loans as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 are  $0 and $2,085,000,
respectively.

     During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, the Company borrowed an
aggregate $125,000 from Pacific Gate Capital Ltd. ("Pacific Gate"), of which
amount $25,000 was outstanding on December 31, 2000. These loans bear interest
at 8% per annum and are payable on demand. The balance of these loans as of
December 31, 2001 is $0.

     On June 18, 2001 at the request of Blue Heron Venture Fund, Ltd. (Blue
Heron), Blue Heron Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $2,085,000 were
cancelled and on June 19, 2001 new promissory notes (the "Blue Heron Shareholder
Notes") in the aggregate principal amount of $2,319,788 were issued to the
shareholders of Blue Heron and Blue Heron's fund manager, Monet Management Group
Ltd. The principal amount of the Blue Heron Shareholder Notes was comprised of
the $2,085,000 principal amount of the Blue Heron Notes and the $234,788 in
interest due on the Blue Heron Notes at the time of cancellation. The Blue Heron
Shareholder Notes were unsecured and were payable on demand. $2,085,000 in
principal amount of the Blue Heron Shareholder Notes bore interest at 8% per
annum. The balance of the Blue Heron Shareholder Notes did not provide for the
payment of interest.

     On September 20, 2001 the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement (the
"Settlement Agreement") with Kelly Shane Montalban with regard to a lawsuit it
had instituted against him on June 15, 2001 in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of New York seeking recovery of short swing profits


                                      F-21
<PAGE>
realized by Mr. Montalban and other persons whose purchases and sales of Company
common stock were attributed to Mr. Montalban in violation of Section 16(b)] of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (see Shane Montalban Litigation
below). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Mr. Montalban paid the Company an
aggregate of approximately $2,498,449 (the "Recovery Amount"), which amount
represented recovery in full of Mr. Montalban's short swing profits. He did so
by delivering to the Company for cancellation (1) the Blue Heron Shareholder
Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $2,319,788, which notes had been
previously purchased by or assigned to Mr. Montalban; (2) the accrued interest
of $42,384 due on the principal portion of the Blue Heron Shareholder Notes at
the time of cancellation; (3) 8% demand notes of the Company dated August 25,
2000 and September 11, 2000, respectively, in the aggregate principal amount of
$25,000 issued to Pacific Gate Capital Corporation, a corporation owned by Mr.
Montalban (the "Pacific Gate C apital Notes"); and (4) the accrued interest of
$2,066 due on the principal portion of the Pacific Gate Capital Notes at the
time of cancellation. The balance of the Recovery Amount was paid by Mr.
Montalban's issuance to the Company of a five (5) year, 5% promissory note,
dated September 20, 2001, in the principal amount of $109,211. In consideration
of the execution of the Settlement Agreement and payment of the Recovery Amount,
on October 9, 2001 the Company voluntarily dismissed its action.

     On October 1, 2001 the Company entered into a consulting agreement with
Pacific Gate Capital Corporation for a one year period in the amount of $27,750
minimum per month for providing certain services to the Company. This agreement
was subsequently cancelled. In the year 2001 the consulting payments reduced the
principal amount owing by Mr. Montalban in the amount of $109,211 by $53,250.

      The Company from time to time lends money to Company executives.
As of December 31,  2001 and 2000, the Company has a non-interest bearing
balance outstanding of $8,484 and $5,371, respectively from one executive.  This
executive officer left the company in 2001.


11.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTIGENCIES

     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

     Canada Post Litigation
     ----------------------

     On June 11, 1999, Canada Post Corporation filed a Statement of Claim in the
Federal Court of Canada (Court File No. T-1022-99) in which it sought injunctive
and unspecified monetary relief for the allegedly "improper" use by the
Company's subsidiary, ePost Innovations, of certain marks and names which


                                      F-22
<PAGE>
contain the component "post".  On October 18, 1999, ePost Innovations filed its
Defense and Counterclaim.  In a motion heard November 24, 1999, Canada Post
Corporation challenged certain parts of the Counterclaim and the Federal Court
reserved judgment.

     On May 25, 1999, ePost Innovations filed a statement of Claim in the
British Columbia Court (Court File No. C992649) seeking a declaration that the
public notice of Canada Post Corporation's adoption and use of CYBERPOSTE and
CYBERPOST on November 18, 1998 and December 9, 1998 respectively, did not affect
the Company's use of CYPOST and ePost Innovations as trademarks and trade-names
prior to said dates. ePost Innovations sought summary judgment for such a
declaration and on September 14, 1999, the BC Court rejected summary judgment on
the basis that no right of the Company was being infringed and that a trial of
the issues was more appropriate. The rejection is pending appeal. There was no
pre-trial discovery (except to the extent that some was done as part of the
summary judgment application).Canada Post seeks relief in the form of preventing
ePost Innovations from using trademarks, trade names or brand names and does not
seek monetary damages.

     On June 20, 2001 ePost Innovations, Canada Post and the Company entered
into a Settlement and Release Agreement effective as of May 30, 2001 (the
"Settlement Agreement"). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the parties
executed mutual releases and discontinued their respective claims. The release
by Canada Post to ePost Innovations was made subject to the Company and ePost
Innovations ceasing all use of the trade name EPOST within Canada within 90 days
of the effective date of the Settlement Agreement and transferring all right,
title and interest they had with respect to the trade name and trademark EPOST
and any goodwill associated therewith to Canada Post upon execution of the
Settlement Agreement. On August 30, 2001 the Company changed the name of its
subsidiary to NetRoverUSA Online Inc.

     The Company has complied with all terms of the Settlement Agreement .

     Berry Litigation
     ----------------

     On March 31, 2000, the Company commenced suit in the Supreme Court of
British Columbia, Action #S001822, Vancouver Registry against Tia Berry (the
"Tia Action"), the wife of Steven Berry ("Berry"), the former President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company. In the Tia Action, the Company claims
$42,516 (CDN) from Tia Berry on account of monies paid to her by the Company
which she was not entitled to receive. Tia Berry has filed a Statement of
Defense in the Tia Action in which she alleges that the payments which she
received from the Company were to reimburse her for business expenses which she
had charged to her credit cards on behalf of Berry. An Examination for Discovery
of Sandra Lynn Warren took place on February 19,2002 in conjunction with this
action. The Tia Action has not yet been set for trial.

     On April 4, 2000, Berry commenced an action in the Supreme Court of the
State of New York, County of New York (Index No. 601448/2000), against the


                                      F-23
<PAGE>
Company and Continental Stock Transfer Company ("Continental"), (the "New York
Action"). In the New York Action, Berry claimed damages for alleged conversion,
fraud, breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty all arising from the
alleged wrongful Stop Transfer Order which the Company placed relating to 75,000
shares of the Company's Common Stock registered in Berry's name and the
Company's cancellation of a further 600,000 shares (the "Contingent Shares").
The complaint in the New York Action claims damages in excess of $3,000,000 with
the precise amount to be determined at trial.

     Berry received the 600,000 Contingent Shares upon condition that he would
remain in the Company's employ as Chief Executive Officer for at least two
years. Berry commenced his employment with the Company on January 4, 1999, and
resigned his employment with the Company on January 17, 2000. Following Berry's
resignation, the Company attempted to have a Stop Transfer Order issued with
respect to the 75,000 shares registered in Berry's name and cancel the 600,000
Contingent Shares. The Stop Transfer Order was not effective and Berry
subsequently sold the 75,000 shares.

     On May 19, 2000 CyPost and ePost Innovations commenced suit in the Supreme
Court of British Columbia, Action #S002798, Vancouver Registry, against Berry
and his wife, Tia Berry (the "BC Action"). In the BC Action, the Company seeks
an order directing Berry to return the 600,000 Contingent Shares to the Company
for cancellation for an order entitling the Company to cancel the same on the
basis that Berry did not fulfill the employment conditions which were the
condition precedent to his becoming the beneficial owner of the Contingent
Shares.

     In the BC Action, the Company also claims at least Cdn$800,000 from Berry
on account of breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, breach of statutory duties
and breach of contract arising from Berry's failure to properly carry out his
employment responsibilities. In the BC Action, the Company also claims
Cdn$34,013 from Berry and Tia Berry on account of conspiracy to defraud and
injure the Company and ePost Innovations by causing certain personal expenses to
be paid by the Company rather than by Berry and Tia Berry personally. The
Company also claims punitive and exemplary damages from Berry and Tia Berry in
the BC Action. The trial date has been set for Monday, January 20, 2003.

     On May 25, 2000, the Company moved in the New York Action for an order
dismissing the action against the Company for lack of jurisdiction or, in the
alternative, on the basis of forum non conveniens. On September 5, 2000, the
court dismissed the New York Action on forum non conveniens grounds, subject to
the Company making certain stipulations in the New York Action. Those
stipulations have been made and the appeal period in the New York Action has
expired without Berry or any other party appealing the September 5, 2000 order.

     The issues raised by Berry and the Company in the New York Action will be
litigated in the BC Action together with the further issues raised by the
Company in the BC Action. The Company feels that Berry's claims in the New York
Action were without merit and that the Company will be successful in obtaining


                                      F-24
<PAGE>
an order declaring that Berry's 600,000 Contingent Shares be cancelled and
further entitling the Company to substantial damages, although no assurance can
be given that this will be the case. The Company will vigorously pursue its
position in all respects.

     On December 21, 2000, Berry and Tia Berry commenced suit in the Supreme
Court of British Columbia, Action #S006790, Vancouver Registry, against CyPost,
ePost Innovations, Kelly Shane Montalban, J. Thomas W. Johnston, Carl Whitehead
and Robert Sendoh (the "Berry Action"). Statements of Defense have been filed on
behalf of the Company and the other defendants.

     The Plaintiffs in the Berry Action allege that the Tia Action, the BC
Action, and the action by Kelly Shane Montalban (Supreme Court of British
Columbia, Action #S002147, Vancouver Registry), against Berry for specific
performance of an option agreement (the "Montalban Action"), collectively,
amount to an abuse of process, malicious prosecution, unlawful interference with
the Plaintiffs' economic rights, or were commenced pursuant to a civil
conspiracy to injure the Plaintiffs.

     In the Berry Action, the Plaintiffs seek a declaration that Berry is
entitled to the 600,000 Contingent Shares and claim unspecified damages which
are estimated at Cdn$2,000,000 based on the Statement of Claim. They also claim
punitive or aggravated damages and costs. The Company believes that the
allegations in the Berry Action are without merit and they will be vigorously
defended. An Examination for Discovery of Kelly Shane Montalban took place over
two days on January 31, 2002 and February 1, 2002 in conjunction with this
action.

     The Tia Action, the BC Action and the Berry Action may be consolidated for
the purposes of trial due to the fact that there are numerous issues of fact and
law which are common to all of these actions.

     A loss by the Company of the claim for monetary damages would have a
material adverse effect on the Company's future results of operations, financial
condition and liquidity; however, the Company does not expect to lose this
action and believes additionally that it would be able to negotiate reasonable
payment terms should it lose this suit.

     The Company has entered into negotiations to settle outstanding litigation.
On February 5, 2002, counsel for Steven and Tia Berry presented to counsel for
the Company an offer to settle the Tia Action, the BC Action, the Berry Action
and the Montalban Action ("All Actions"). On March 4, 2002, counsel for the
Company sent to counsel for Steven and Tia Berry a counter-offer to settle All
Actions. On March 12, 2002, counsel for the Company received a letter for Steven
and Tia Berry rejecting the counter-offer to settle of March 2, 2002. The
Company has entered into settlement negotiations motivated by the best interests
of the Company but without any admission of liability.


                                      F-25
<PAGE>
SHANE  MONTALBAN  LITIGATION

     On June 15, 2001 the Company filed a Summons and Complaint against Kelly
Shane Montalban in the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York (CyPost Corp. v. Kelly Shane Montalban, Civ. 5447). The Complaint
alleged that, between September 1999 and June 15, 2001 (the "Recovery Period"),
numerous purchases and sales of the Company's common stock were made in
violation of the short swing profit recovery provisions of Section 16(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. ("Section 16(b)").

     Section 16(b) imposes strict liability on corporate insiders, including
principal stockholders, for engaging in short swing trading activities (a sale
and purchase or purchase and sale occurring within any six (6) month period)
without regard as to whether true profits were realized by the insider from such
trading activities. During the Recovery Period, numerous purchases and sales of
the Company's common stock were made in violation of Section 16(b). Although the
Company did not believe that any of such purchases and sales were based on
non-public information, the Company nonetheless required by the strict liability
provisions of Section 16(b) to seek recovery. The Company ultimately determined
that the amount of short swing profits realized within the Recovery Period was
$2,498,449 (the "Recovery Amount"). Mr. Montalban cooperated fully with the
Company's investigation and agreed to make payment in full of the Recovery
Amount. Pursuant thereto, on September 20, 2001 the Company entered into a
Settlement Agreement. Part of the Recovery Amount was paid by Mr. Montalban by
way of his delivery to the Company for cancellation, on September 20, 2001,
various promissory notes of the Company on which the Company owed an aggregate
of $2,344,788 in principal and $44,450 in interest or a total of $2,389,238.

     The notes delivered for cancellation included a note which had been
assigned to Mr. Montalban by the holder to satisfy an obligation of the holder
to Mr. Montalban, notes which had been purchased by Mr. Montalban from various
individuals, and a note held by Pacific Gate Capital Corporation, a corporation
owned by Mr. Montalban. The balance of the Recovery Amount was paid by the
issuance to the Company of his five (5) year, 5% promissory note, dated
September 20, 2001, in the principal amount of $109,211. In consideration of the
execution of the Settlement Agreement and payment of the Recovery Amount, on
October 9, 2001 the Company voluntarily dismissed its action.

     WORLDCOM  DISPUTE

     On June 30, 1999 NetRover Inc ("NetRover") entered into a Virtual Internet


                                      F-26
<PAGE>
Provider Agreement with WorldCom Canada Ltd ("WorldCom"). A dispute arose
between the parties regarding certain credits claimed by NetRover and amounts
claimed as owed by NetRover to WorldCom in the amount of Cdn$633,368.

     On November 8, 2001 NetRover entered into a Settlement Agreement
("Settlement") with WorldCom. The parties have agreed to a settlement of
Cdn$91,000 which have been paid in three installments.

The Company has complied with all terms of the Settlement Agreement.

     DOMINION ACTION

     On September 13, 2001, Dominion Information et al ("Dominion") commenced
suit in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Action # S015127, Vancouver
Registry (the "Dominion Action") against Hermes Net Solutions, CyPost
Corporation and Stephen Choi, a former shareholder, director and secretary of
Hermes Net Solutions until June 30, 1999.  As of June 30, 1999, Hermes was a
wholly owned subsidiary of CyPost Corporation.  In the Dominion Action, Dominion
claims $19,339 (CDN) from the defendant Hermes Net Solutions pursuant to an
agreement whereby Dominion published advertisements on behalf Hermes Net
Solutions.  In the alternative, Dominion claims that CyPost Corporation was
unjustly enriched by the amount claimed.  The defendants Hermes Net Solutions
and CyPost Corporation filed a Statement of Defense in the Dominion Action in
which they state that the defendant Stephen Choi did not have authority to enter
any agreement on their behalf.  Furthermore, the Statement of Defense denies the
existence of an agreement, any benefit from an agreement or any unjust
enrichment from an agreement.

     On February 16, 2002, settlement terms were proposed by Dominion.  Hermes
Net Solutions and CyPost Corporation decided it would be in their best interest
to settle this litigation by making a lump sum payment and twelve monthly
payments commencing April 1, 2002 and to March 1, 2003.  When Hermes Net
Solutions has completed the payment schedule in March, 2003, Dominion will file
the Consent Dismissal Order, dismissing the Dominion Action.

CNW ACTION

     On January 14, 2002, Connect Northwest Internet Services, LLC, a Washington
limited liability company, d/b/a Skagit County Networking LLC ("CNW") commenced
suit in the Superior Court of Washington for King County, Case No.
02-2-01906-4SEA, against CyPost Corporation (the "CNW Action").  In the CNW
Action, CNW claims $30,529 (U.S.) plus interest, costs and attorney's fees from
the Company on account of monies owing pursuant to an asset purchase agreement
of October 27, 1999.

     On February 13, 2002, the Company was able to settle this litigation.  The
Company agreed to make a lump sun payment of $6,000 U.S. to CNW by February 28,


                                      F-27
<PAGE>
2002 followed by payments of $4,000 U.S. on the 15th of each month thereafter
until August 15, 2002 for a total payment of $30,000 U.S.  Once the Company has
made its final payment on August, 15, 2002, CNW will dismiss the action.

     TAMI HELEN ALLAN

     On November 2, 2001, Tami Helen Allan ("Allan") commenced suit in the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Chatham-Kent, against NetRover Inc., CyPost
Corporation, Robert Sendoh, Kelly Shane Montalban, Angela Belcourt and J. Thomas
W. Johnston (the "Allan Action"). In the Allan Action, Allan claims that as a
result of the wrongful termination of Allan's employment, Allan has sustained
damages including loss of salary in the amount of $600,000 (CDN).

     On November 9, 2001 the Company filed a Notice of Defense.

     A loss by the Company of the claim for monetary damages would have a
material adverse effect on the Company's future results of operations, financial
condition and liquidity; however, the Company does not expect to lose this
action and believes additionally that it would be able to negotiate reasonable
payment terms should it lose this suit.

     The Company is also subject to routine litigation from time to time in the
operations of its business.  None of such routine litigation is material to the
Company, its assets or results of operations.

     Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, the Company cannot predict
the outcome of any litigation to which it is a party.

     LEASE COMMITMENTS

     The Company leases office space and equipment under non-cancelable
operating leases expiring thru 2006, that have initial or remaining lease terms
in excess of one year as of December 31, 2001. The total lease expense under the
operating leases is $321,601 for year ended December 31, 2001.  The following is
a schedule by years of future minimum lease payments required under the
non-cancelable operating leases:

        2002                                    $327,755
        2003                                     203,011
        2004                                     123,411
        2005                                      47,161
        2006                                         453
                                                --------
                                                $701,791
                                                ========


                                      F-28
<PAGE>
     The Company entered into agreements with several companies that provides
network infrastructure for some of the Company's Internet Services Provider
services. The minimum payments in the next three years are as follows:

          2002                                    1,377,674
          2003                                      284,007
                                                 ----------
                                                 $1,661,681
                                                 ==========

     BUSINESS CONCENTRATIONS

     The Company's success depends upon the capacity, scalability, reliability
and security of its network infrastructure, including the telecommunications
capacity leased from WorldCom and other telecommunications network suppliers. We
depend on such companies to maintain the operational integrity of their own
telecommunications networks. Therefore, our operating results depend, in part,
upon the pricing and availability of telecommunications network capacity from a
limited number of providers in a consolidated market. A material increase in
pricing or decrease in telecommunications capacity available to us could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

     On January 29, 2002, at the Annual Meeting of Company Stockholders, an
amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation was voted on and
subsequently approved whereby the number of authorized shares of the Company's
common stock was increased from 30,000,000 to 200,000,000 shares.

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
   No.    Description

10.1      Directors resolution dated June 22, 2001 acknowledging the transfer of
          loan amount of Two Million Eighty Five Thousand US Dollars plus the
          accrued interest of eight percent as from Blue Heron Venture Fund, Ltd
          to individual shareholders of Blue Heron Venture Fund, Ltd.

10.2      Promissory Notes executed by CyPost Corporation dated June 19, 2001;
          in favor of James A. Mylock, JR.

10.3      Promissory Notes executed by CyPost Corporation dated June 19, 2001;
          in favor of Amanda E. Johnson.

10.4      Promissory Notes executed by CyPost Corporation dated June 19, 2001;
          in favor of John M. Peragine.


                                      F-29
<PAGE>
10.5      Promissory Notes executed by CyPost Corporation dated June 19, 2001;
          in favor of Joseph A. Fiore.

10.6      Promissory Notes executed by CyPost Corporation dated June 19, 2001;
          in favor of Berkshire Capital Management Co., Inc.

10.7      Promissory Notes executed by CyPost Corporation dated June 19, 2001;
          in favor of Bayshore Trading LTD.

10.8      Promissory Notes executed by CyPost Corporation dated June 19, 2001;
          in favor of Kelly Shane Montalban.

10.9      Settlement Agreement dated as of September 20, 2001 between CyPost
          Corporation and Kelly Shane Montalban. regarding violations of Section
          16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

10.10     Promissory Note executed by CyPost Corporation dated September 2001;
          in favor of CyPost Corporation.


                                      F-30
<PAGE>