Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 2014 / Notices 75787 

1See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013– 

2014, 79 FR 54678 (September 12, 2014) 

(‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 

2 In the Initiation Notice, we stated that because 

the order was revoked with respect to subject 

merchandise produced and exported by Regal, this 

administrative review covers all subject 

merchandise exported by Regal and manufactured 

by any company other than Regal. See Initiation 

Notice 79 FR at 18275 at footnote 5. 

3See Letter to the Secretary of Commerce from 

Shantou Yuexing ‘‘Shantou Yuexing Enterprise 

Company’s Request for rescinding an 

Administrative Review’’ (April 2, 2014); Letter to 

the Secretary of Commerce from Rizhao Smart 

Foods Co., Ltd. ‘‘Certificate of No Sales’’ (April 9, 

2014); Letter to the Secretary of Commerce from 

Zhanjiang Regal Integrated Marine Resources Co., 

Ltd. ‘‘No Shipments Statement of Zhanjiang Regal 

Integrated Marine Resources Co., Ltd.’’ (June 2, 

2014). 

4See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 54679. 

5 Id. 

6 Id. 

7 ‘‘Tails’’ in this context means the tail fan, which 

includes the telson and the uropods. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[S–166–2014] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 231—Stockton, 

California Application for Subzone 

Expansion Medline Industries, Inc.; 

Lathrop, California 

An application has been submitted to 

the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board by 

the Port of Stockton, California, grantee 

of FTZ 231, requesting an additional site 

within Subzone 231A on behalf of 

Medline Industries, Inc. (Medline), 

located in Lathrop, California. The 

application was submitted pursuant to 

the provisions of the Foreign-Trade 

Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a81u), and the regulations of the FTZ 

Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally 

docketed on December 15, 2014. 

Subzone 231A was approved on 

March 4, 2007 (72 FR 14516, 03/28/

2007) and currently consists of one site: 

Site 1 (12.49 acres) 18250 Murphy 

Parkway, Lathrop. The applicant is now 

requesting authority to include an 

additional site: Proposed Site 2 (9.03 

acres), 501 D’Arcy Parkway, Lathrop. No 

authorization for production activity has 

been requested at this time. The 

proposed subzone would be subject to 

the existing activation limit of FTZ 231. 

In accordance with the FTZ Board’s 

regulations, Christopher Kemp of the 

FTZ Staff is designated examiner to 

review the application and make 

recommendations to the Executive 

Secretary. 

Public comment is invited from 

interested parties. Submissions shall be 

addressed to the FTZ Board’s Executive 

Secretary at the address below. The 

closing period for their receipt is 

January 28, 2015. Rebuttal comments in 

response to material submitted during 

the foregoing period may be submitted 

during the subsequent 15-day period to 

February 12, 2015. 

A copy of the application will be 

available for public inspection at the 

Office of the Executive Secretary, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 

21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

1401 Constitution Avenue NW, 

Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the 

‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the FTZ 

Board’s Web site, which is accessible 

via www.trade.gov/ftz. 

For further information, contact 

Christopher Kemp at christopher.kemp@

trade.gov or (202) 482–0862. 

Dated: December 15, 2014. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29782 Filed 12–18–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–893] 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2013–2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: On September 12, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

‘‘Department’’) published the 

Preliminary Results of the 2013–2014 

administrative review on certain frozen 

warmwater shrimp (‘‘shrimp’’) from the 

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’), 

covering the period of review (‘‘POR’’) 

from February 1, 2013, through January 

31, 2014.1 We gave interested parties an 

opportunity to submit comments on the 

Preliminary Results, but none were 

received. Therefore, these final results 

are unchanged from the Preliminary 

Results, and we continue to find that 

Shantou Yuexing Enterprise Company 

(‘‘SYEC’’), and Zhanjiang Regal 

Integrated Marine Resources Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Regal’’) did not have reviewable 

entries during this POR. Additionally, 

we continue to find that Rizhao Smart 

Foods Co., Ltd. (‘‘Smart Foods’’) is not 

eligible for a separate rate, and we will 

continue to treat it as part of the PRCwide entity. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 19, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kabir Archuletta, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–2593. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 14, 2014, the 

Department published the Preliminary 

Results of this administrative review. 

SYEC, Smart Foods, and Regal 2

submitted ‘‘no shipment certifications’’ 

to the Department.3 In response to the 

Department’s query, U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) did not 

provide any evidence that contradicted 

SYEC or Regal’s claims of no shipments. 

The Department received no comments 

from interested parties concerning the 

results of the CBP queries. Therefore, 

based on SYEC and Regal’s 

certifications and our analysis of CBP 

information, we preliminarily 

determined that SYEC and Regal did not 

have any reviewable entries during the 

POR.4 With regard to Smart Foods, we 

noted that because it was previously 

found to be part of the PRC-wide entity, 

and continues to be part of the PRCwide entity for this review, we were not 

making a determination regarding its no 

shipments certification.5 In the 

Preliminary Results we determined that 

58 companies in total should be treated 

as part of the PRC-wide entity.6 We 

invited interested parties to comment on 

the Preliminary Results. We received no 

comments from interested parties. 

Scope of the Order 

The scope of the order includes 

certain frozen warmwater shrimp and 

prawns, whether wild-caught (ocean 

harvested) or farm-raised (produced by 

aquaculture), head-on or head-off, shellon or peeled, tail-on or tail-off,7

deveined or not deveined, cooked or 

raw, or otherwise processed in frozen 

form. 

The frozen warmwater shrimp and 

prawn products included in the scope of 

the order, regardless of definitions in 

the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

(‘‘HTS’’), are products which are 

processed from warmwater shrimp and 

prawns through freezing and which are 

sold in any count size. 

The products described above may be 

processed from any species of 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

75788 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 2014 / Notices 

8The specific exclusion for Lee Kum Kee’s 

shrimp sauce applies only to the scope in the PRC 

case. 

9On April 26, 2011, the Department amended the 

antidumping duty order to include dusted shrimp, 

pursuant to the CIT decision in Ad Hoc Shrimp 

Trade Action Committee v. United States, 703 F. 

Supp. 2d 1330 (CIT 2010), and the U.S. 

International Trade Commission determination, 

which found the domestic like product to include 

dusted shrimp. See Certain Frozen Warmwater 

Shrimp from Brazil, India, the People’s Republic of 

China, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders in 

Accordance with Final Court Decision, 76 FR 23277 

(April 26, 2011) (‘‘Order’’); see also Frozen 

Warmwater Shrimp from Brazil, China, India, 

Thailand, and Vietnam (Investigation Nos. 731– 

TA–1063, 1064, 1066–1068 (Review), USITC 

Publication 4221, March 2011. 

10See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 54679. 

11See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (‘‘Assessment Practice 

Refinement’’). See also the ‘‘Assessment’’ section of 

this notice, below. 

12See Administrative Review of Certain Frozen 

Warmwater Shrimp from the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Results, Partial Rescission of Sixth 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Determination Not To Revoke in Part, 77 FR 53856 

(September 4, 2012) at Appendix II; see also Certain 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of Administrative 

Review; 2011–2012, 78 FR 56209 (September 12, 

2013). 

13Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of 

Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

14Those companies for which a review was 

requested and which we determine are part of the 

PRC-wide entity include: Asian Seafoods 

(Zhanjiang) Co., Ltd., Beihai Angbang Seafood Co., 

Ltd., Beihai Boston Frozen Food Co., Ltd., Dalian 

Shanhai Seafood Co., Ltd., Dalian Taiyang Aquatic 

Products Co., Ltd., Eimskip Logistics (Qingdao) Co., 

Ltd., EZ Logistics Inc., EZ Logistics LLC (Qingdao 

Branch), Fujian Chaohui International Trading, 

Fujian Rongjiang Import and Export Co., Ltd., 

Fujian Tea Import & Export Co., Ltd., Fujian Zhaoan 

Haili Aquatic Co., Ltd., Fuqing Dongwei Aquatic 

Products Ind., Fuqing Minhua Trade Co., Ltd., 

Fuqing Yihua Aquatic Food Co., Ltd., Guangdong 

Foodstuffs Import & Export (Group) Corporation, 

Guangdong Gourmet Aquatic Products Co., Ltd., 

Guangdong Jinhang Food Co., Ltd., Guangdong 

Jinhang Foods Co., Ltd., Guangdong Wanshida 

Holding Corp., Guangdong Wanya Foods Fty. Co., 

Ltd., Guangzhou Shi Runjin Trading Development 

Co., Ltd., Haida Seafood Co., Ltd., HaiLi Aquatic 

Product Co., Ltd., Hainan Brich Aquatic Products 

Co., Ltd., Hua Yang (Dalian), International 

Transportation Service Co., Huazhou XinHai 

Aquatic Products Co. Ltd., Jiazhou Foods Industry 

Co., Ltd., Longhai Gelin Foods Co., Ltd., Longhai 

Gelin Seafoods Co., Ltd., Maoming Xinzhou 

Seafood Co., Ltd., North Seafood Group Co., Panwin 

International Logistics Co., Ltd., Pingye Foreign 

Transportation Corp. Ltd of Shantou, SE.Z., Rizhao 

Smart Foods Company Limited, Savvy Seafood Inc., 

Shanghai Lingpu Aquatic Products Co., Ltd., 

Shanghai Smiling Food Co., Ltd.. Shantou Freezing 

Aquatic Product Foodstuffs Co., Shantou Jiazhou 

Food Industrial Co., Ltd., Shantou Jin Cheng Food 

Co., Ltd., Shantou Jintai Aquatic Product Industrial 

Co., Ltd., Shantou Li An Plastic Products Co. Ltd., 

Shantou Longsheng Aquatic Product Foodstuff Co., 

Ltd., Shantou Wanya Foods Fty. Co., Ltd., Thai 

Royal Frozen Food Zhanjiang Co., Ltd., Yangjiang 

Anyang Food Co., Ltd., Yangjiang City Haida 

warmwater shrimp and prawns. 

Warmwater shrimp and prawns are 

generally classified in, but are not 

limited to, the Penaeidae family. Some 

examples of the farmed and wild-caught 

warmwater species include, but are not 

limited to, white-leg shrimp (Penaeus 

vannemei), banana prawn (Penaeus 

merguiensis), fleshy prawn (Penaeus 

chinensis), giant river prawn 

(Macrobrachium rosenbergii), giant tiger 

prawn (Penaeus monodon), redspotted 

shrimp (Penaeus brasiliensis), southern 

brown shrimp (Penaeus subtilis), 

southern pink shrimp (Penaeus 

notialis), southern rough shrimp 

(Trachypenaeus curvirostris), southern 

white shrimp (Penaeus schmitti), blue 

shrimp (Penaeus stylirostris), western 

white shrimp (Penaeus occidentalis), 

and Indian white prawn (Penaeus 

indicus). 

Frozen shrimp and prawns that are 

packed with marinade, spices or sauce 

are included in the scope of the order. 

In addition, food preparations, which 

are not ‘‘prepared meals,’’ that contain 

more than 20 percent by weight of 

shrimp or prawn are also included in 

the scope of the order. 

Excluded from the scope are: (1) 

Breaded shrimp and prawns (HTS 

subheading 1605.20.1020); (2) shrimp 

and prawns generally classified in the 

Pandalidae family and commonly 

referred to as coldwater shrimp, in any 

state of processing; (3) fresh shrimp and 

prawns whether shell-on or peeled (HTS 

subheadings 0306.23.0020 and 

0306.23.0040); (4) shrimp and prawns in 

prepared meals (HTS subheading 

1605.20.0510); (5) dried shrimp and 

prawns; (6) Lee Kum Kee’s shrimp 

sauce; 8 (7) canned warmwater shrimp 

and prawns (HTS subheading 

1605.20.1040); and (8) certain battered 

shrimp. Battered shrimp is a shrimpbased product: (1) That is produced 

from fresh (or thawed-from-frozen) and 

peeled shrimp; (2) to which a ‘‘dusting’’ 

layer of rice or wheat flour of at least 95 

percent purity has been applied; (3) 

with the entire surface of the shrimp 

flesh thoroughly and evenly coated with 

the flour; (4) with the non-shrimp 

content of the end product constituting 

between four and 10 percent of the 

product’s total weight after being 

dusted, but prior to being frozen; and (5) 

that is subjected to individually quick 

frozen (‘‘IQF’’) freezing immediately 

after application of the dusting layer. 

When dusted in accordance with the 

definition of dusting above, the battered 

shrimp product is also coated with a 

wet viscous layer containing egg and/or 

milk, and par-fried. 

The products covered by these orders 

are currently classified under the 

following HTS subheadings: 

0306.17.0003, 0306.17.0006, 

0306.17.0009, 0306.17.0012, 

0306.17.0015, 0306.17.0018, 

0306.17.0021, 0306.17.0024, 

0306.17.0027, 0306.17.0040, 

1605.21.1030, and 1605.29.1010. These 

HTS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and for customs purposes 

only; the written description of the 

scope of these orders is dispositive.9

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, the 

Department determined that Regal and 

SYEC had no sales of subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR.10 We stated, consistent with 

the recently announced refinement to its 

assessment practice in non-market 

economy (‘‘NME’’) cases, that the 

Department would not rescind the 

review in these circumstances but, 

rather, would complete the review with 

respect to Regal and SYEC and issue 

appropriate instructions to CBP based 

on the final results of the review. As 

stated above, we did not receive any 

comments on our Preliminary Results 

nor did we receive information from 

CBP indicating that there were 

reviewable transactions for Regal or 

SYEC during the POR. Therefore, we 

continue to determine that Regal and 

SYEC had no reviewable transactions of 

subject merchandise during the POR. 

Consistent with our ‘‘automatic 

assessment’’ clarification, the 

Department will issue appropriate 

instructions to CBP based on our final 

results.11

PRC-Wide Entity 

Because Smart Foods was found to be 

part of the PRC-wide entity in recent 

administrative reviews of the Order,12

had no reviewable sales or entries in 

this review, and, consequently, did not 

demonstrate eligibility for a separate 

rate, Smart Foods continues to be part 

of the PRC-wide entity. Therefore, we 

continue to find that 58 companies, 

including Smart Foods, should be 

treated as part of the PRC-wide entity. 

The Department’s change in policy 

regarding conditional review of the 

PRC-wide entity applies to this 

administrative review.13 Under this 

policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be 

under review unless a party specifically 

requests, or the Department selfinitiates, a review of the entity. Because 

no party requested a review of the PRCwide entity, the entity is not under 

review and the entity’s rate is not 

subject to change. The Department finds 

that 58 companies 14 under review have 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 2014 / Notices 75789 

Seafood Company Ltd., Yangjiang City Hongwai 

Seafood Company, Ltd., Zhangzhou Xinwanya 

Aquatic Product Co., Ltd., Zhangzhou Yanfeng 

Aquatic Product, Zhanjiang Evergreen Aquatic 

Product Science and Technology Co., Ltd., 

Zhanjiang Fuchang Aquatic Products Co., Ltd., 

Zhanjiang Jinguo Marine Foods Co., Ltd., Zhanjiang 

Longwei Aquatic Products Industry Co., Ltd., 

Zhanjiang Universal Seafood Corp., Zhanjiang 

Newpro Foods Co., Ltd., Zhaoan Yangli Aquatic 

Co., Ltd. 

15See Assessment Practice Refinement, 76 FR at 

65694. 

1See the memorandum from Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Stainless Steel Bar from 

Brazil,’’ dated concurrently with this notice 

(Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which is 

hereby adopted by this notice. 

2On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

not established eligibility for a separate 

rate and, thus, they should continue to 

be part of the PRC-wide entity for these 

final results. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, the 

Department will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. The Department 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

to CBP 15 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of 

review. The Department recently 

announced a refinement to its 

assessment practice in NME cases. 

Pursuant to this refinement in practice, 

for entries that were not reported in the 

U.S. sales databases submitted by 

companies individually examined 

during this review, the Department will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the NME-wide rate. In addition, if the 

Department determines that an exporter 

under review had no shipments of the 

subject merchandise, any suspended 

entries that entered under that 

exporter’s case number (i.e., at that 

exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the 

NME-wide rate.15

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for shipments of 

the subject merchandise from the PRC 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by 

sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

previously investigated or reviewed PRC 

and non-PRC exporters that received a 

separate rate in a prior segment of this 

proceeding that are not listed in 

footnote 14, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (2) for all PRC exporters of 

subject merchandise that have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate 

(including the firms listed in footnote 

14), the cash deposit rate will be the 

existing rate for the PRC-wide entity; 

and (3) for all non-PRC exporters of 

subject merchandise which have not 

received their own rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

PRC exporter that supplied that nonPRC exporter. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notifications 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 

CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Department’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties has occurred and 

the subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to the administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

notification of the destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and this notice in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: December 12, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29675 Filed 12–18–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–351–825] 

Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2013– 

2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on stainless 

steel bar (SSB) from Brazil. The period 

of review (POR) is February 1, 2013, 

through January 31, 2014. The review 

covers one producer/exporter of the 

subject merchandise, Villares Metals 

S.A. (Villares). We preliminarily find 

that subject merchandise has not been 

sold at less than normal value. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 19, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Catherine Cartsos or Minoo Hatten, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1757, and (202) 

482–1690, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is SSB. The SSB subject to the order is 

currently classifiable under subheadings 

7222.1000, 7222.1100, 7222.1900, 

7222.2000, 7222.3000 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). While the 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description is dispositive. A full 

description of the scope of the order is 

contained in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.1

Methodology 

The Department conducted this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). Constructed export 

price and export price are calculated in 

accordance with section 772 of the Act. 

Normal value is calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is made available to the 

public via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS).2

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and is 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES