alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      14,847,399
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      10,987,274
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               480,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,808,557
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     57,668,792
<ALLOWANCE>                                    661,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              82,681,918
<DEPOSITS>                                  75,543,472
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            663,628
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       561,044
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,913,774
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               6,474,818
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,354,472
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               70,369
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               555,576
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,980,417
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,861,168
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,861,168
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,119,249
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   94,254
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,866,811
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                524,088
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     524,088
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   326,388
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.94
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,513,157
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               685,706
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  132,828
<RECOVERIES>                                    14,391
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              661,523
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           661,523
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        636,523
        

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134815 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134815 

 COA: 277613 

Wayne CC: 00-011373-01

HAROLD SHAW,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 17, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p1217 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2007 

 Clerk
No. 87-6321.

#### Brewer *v.*California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LILLIE MIMS, et al., )

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-00643-KD-M

)

MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF )

EDUCATION, et al., )

Defendants. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no 

objections filed, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 10) of the Magistrate Judge made under 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated May 20, 2014, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Mims’s Title 

VII claims as untimely (Doc. 4) is DENIED and the remainder of the Motion For More Definite 

Statement (Doc. 4) is GRANTED in accordance with the instructions set out in the Report and 

Recommendation. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff Turner’s voluntary dismissal as to her 

Title VII claims is GRANTED.

DONE and ORDERED this the 4th day of June 2014.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00643-KD-M Document 11 Filed 06/04/14 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ALBERT CURRY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0517-CG-B

)

TODD HANKS, )

)

Defendant. )

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order entered this date, it is ORDERED, 

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendant 

Todd Hanks, and against Plaintiff, Albert Curry. Plaintiff’s claims against 

Defendant Todd Hanks are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED this 29th day of February, 2016. 

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00517-CG-B Document 36 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 240 (Monday, December 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 74091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29250]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 9, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Vice President) 
33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Sterling Bancorp, Montebello, New York; to merge with Hudson 
Valley Holding Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire Hudson 
Valley Bank, N.A., both of Yonkers, New York.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 10, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-29250 Filed 12-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1402 

CAF 14-02090 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

 

IN THE MATTER OF AMELIA S. AND MARGARET L. 

----------------------------------------------- 

JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 ORDER

ELIZABETH S., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

----------------------------------------------- 

IN THE MATTER OF AMELIA S. 

----------------------------------------------- 

JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

ELIZABETH S., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

MICHAEL J. PULVER, NORTH SYRACUSE, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

MICHAEL D. WERNER, WATERTOWN, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

SUSAN A. SOVIE, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, WATERTOWN. 

SCOTT A. OTIS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, WATERTOWN.

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Jefferson County (John

J. Brennan, A.J.), entered October 14, 2014 in proceedings pursuant to

Family Court Act article 10. The order, among other things, adjudged

that respondent had neglected and abused the subject children. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decisions

at Family Court.

Entered: December 23, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     INTERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
     ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     981,458
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         981,458
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  390,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    19,566
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,507,192
<PP&E>                                         6,092,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,039,145)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,571,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,674,658
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       70,371
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,091,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,571,938
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,685,633
<CGS>                                          1,230,680
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  901,611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             199,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (645,698)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (645,698)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (34,988)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (680,681)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        




</TABLE>
Photonic Metamaterials: Recent Progress

Martin Wegener

Institut für Angewandte Physik

Karlsruhe Institute of Technolgy

Wolgang-Gaede-Strasse 1

76131 Karlsruhe, Germany

Martin.Wegener@kit.edu

Abstract: We review our recent progress regarding the nanofabrication and characterization of 

metamaterials operating at optical frequencies. In particular, we will emphasize direct laser 

writing to achieve three-dimensional metallic and dielectric structures. Examples are gold-helix 

metamaterials acting as compact broadband circular polarizers or three-dimensional broadband 

invisibility-cloaking structures. Furthermore, we will report on our progress regarding electromodulation of metallic metamaterials and on bringing gain to metamaterials aiming at loss 

compensation.
#### Commonwealth *v.*Mina Burschulz, et al.

Criminal Law — Intoxicating Liquors — Indictment.

In charging a sale on gift of spirituous and vinous liquors to intoxicated persons, it is necessary to name the persons.

Indictment.

In charging a sale of liquors to minors, such minors must be named and it must be averred that the sale was made without the special written direction of the father or guardian of such minor.

APPEAL FROM HANCOCK CIRCUIT COURT.

June 8, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

The indictment in this case does not sufficiently charge a breach of the coffee house bond on which it is based.

The particular facts should have been stated, as that the defendant, Burschulz, sold or gave spirituous and vinous liquors to named persons, who were at the time intoxicated and acting in a disorderly way. A charge that she so sold or gave liquors to persons not named is too general, and would not enable the defendant to pre*472pare for an intelligent defense, or to plead a judgment on the indictment in bar of a subsequent prosecution.

*John Rodman, for appellant. Murray & Powers, for appellees.*

The charge that she sold spirituous and vinous liquors to minors, is defective for the same, and for the additional reason that it is not charged that such selling was without the special written direction of the father or guardian of such minor.

There is no law forbidding' or prescribing the manner or conditions upon which such liquors may be sold to free negroes; and consequently no degree of particularity could have made the attempted charge of a breach in that regard good.

The indictment is also fatally defective in failing to charge that the alleged selling and giving to persons who were drunk and disorderly, and to minors, was in the defendant’s coffee house or on the premises thereof.

Judgment *affirmed.*
|  (1) |  the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the applicable requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                            |

|  (2)                |  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| of the Registrant.  |
11474.

#### Austin *v.*The State.

Broyles, C. J.

1. There is no substantial merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. There was some slight evidence which authorized the verdict, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the judge and no error of *402law appearing, this court is .without authority to interfere with the discretion of the judge in refusing to grant a new trial.

Decided June 15, 1920.

Indictment for larceny after trust; from Bibb superior court — Judge Mathews. March 22, 1920.

*H. F. Rawls, W. J. Grace,*for plaintiff in error.

*Charles H. Garrett, solicitor-general,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
EXHIBIT 12.1

 

Cherokee International,LLC

Calculation of Ratio ofEarnings to Fixed Charges

 
|                                       |   | **Year Ended December 31**        |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                                       |   | **2001**                          |   | **2000** |   | **1999** |   | **1998** |   | **1997** |   |
|                                       |   | **(In thousands, except ratios)** |   |
| Earnings  (loss)                           |   |                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                       |   |                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Income  (loss) before Income taxes         |   | $                                 | (6,225 | ) | $ | 11,695 |   | $ | 16,552 |   | $ | 23,900 |   | $ | 18,538 |   |
| Fixed  charges                             |   | 17,261                            |   | 17,424 |   | 11,294 |   | 860 |   | 1,504 |   |
|                                       |   |                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Total  Earnings                            |   | $                                 | 11,036 |   | $ | 29,119 |   | $ | 27,846 |   | $ | 24,760 |   | $ | 20,042 |   |
|                                       |   |                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed  Charges                             |   |                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                       |   |                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest                                   |   | $                                 | 16,470 |   | $ | 16,779 |   | $ | 10,675 |   | $ | 373 |   | $ | 1,065 |   |
|                                       |   |                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Implicit  rental   Interest expense        |   | 791                               |   | 645 |   | 619 |   | 487 |   | 439 |   |
| Total  Fixed Charges                       |   | $                                 | 17,261 |   | $ | 17,424 |   | $ | 11,294 |   | $ | 860 |   | $ | 1,504 |   |
|                                       |   |                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio  of Earnings (loss) to Fixed Charges |   | 0.6x                              |   | 1.7x |   | 2.5x |   | 28.8x |   | 13.3x |   |
|                                            |        |                                   |        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Exhibit 10.1


 


FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT TERM SHEET


 


Recitals


 


		1.	This binding Term Sheet is executed by and between Cirque Energy, Inc. (“Cirque”) and Matthew Morris (“Morris”).



 


		2.	Convertible Promissory Notes addressed by and included in this Term Sheet: (1) 8% Convertible Promissory Note dated November
8, 2013 between Cirque and Morris with an original principal amount of $46,500 (“Note 1”), and (2) 8% Convertible Promissory
Note Morris assumed on November 7, 2013 between Asher Enterprises, Inc. and Cirque with an original principal amount of $32,500
(“Note 2”, collectively the “Notes”).



 


Terms


 


Morris agrees to:


 


		1.	Immediately rescind and cancel his Notice of Default for Note 1 served on Cirque May 5, 2015 and suspend any declaration of
default on the Notes until at least July 15, 2015, as per the terms below.



 


Cirque agrees to:


 


		1.	Increase the current principal balance of the Notes by 25%. Following the application of all previous amendments to the Notes
and inclusive of the 25% balance increase specified herein, the balance of Note 1 will be $76,171 and the balance of Note 2 will
be $108,984. These amounts are subject to verification by Cirque prior to the execution of the formal Forbearance Agreement.



		2.	Change the conversion rate of the Notes to equal 30% of the immediately preceding 3-day average VWAP (or, in other words, a
70% discount to the 3-day average VWAP).



		3.	Increase the interest rate on the Notes to 12.00% per annum.



		4.	Establish an irrevocable reserve account of 25,000,000 shares with its transfer agent for the Notes immediately following its
shareholders’ approval to increase its authorized shares to 900,000,000. This reserve shall be drawn down as per any conversion
demands presented by Morris to Cirque in accordance with the terms of the Notes.



 


If Cirque’s authorized shares have not been increased
to 900,000,000 shares by July 15, 2015, Morris reserves the right to declare either or both Note 1 and Note 2 in default at any
time thereafter.


 


Cirque agrees in good faith to draft and deliver a formal Forbearance
Agreement for execution based on this Term Sheet within ten (10) days of the date of this Agreement. However, notwithstanding,
Morris agrees to immediately rescind and cancel his Notice of Default for Note 1 served on Cirque May 5, 2015, pursuant to and
conditioned on the other Terms described above and the execution of the formal Forbearance Agreement.


 


	CIRQUE ENERGY, INC.	 	MATTHEW MORRIS
	 	 	 
	/s/ David W. Morgan	 	/s/ Matthew Morris
	David W. Morgan	 	Matthew Morris
	Its: Chief Financial Officer	 	Dated:  May 13, 2015
	Dated:  May 13, 2015
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1738 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to make 

a technical correction to the water rights settlement for the ShoshonePaiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2023 

Mr. AMODEI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 

2009 to make a technical correction to the water rights 

settlement for the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck 

Valley Reservation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Technical Correction 

5 to the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Res6 ervation Water Rights Settlement Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1738 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF PAYMENT OF INTEREST ON 

2 TRUST FUNDS ESTABLISHED UNDER SETTLE3 MENT. 

4 Section 10807(b)(3) of the Omnibus Public Land 

5 Management Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 

6 1408) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘There is’’ and inserting the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—There is’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(B) ADJUSTED INTEREST PAYMENTS.— 

12 In addition to funds made available under sub13 paragraph (A), there is authorized to be appro14 priated to the Secretary for deposit into the De15 velopment Fund $5,124,902.12. 

16 ‘‘(C) INDEXING.—Amounts made available 

17 under subparagraph (B) shall be adjusted on 

18 deposit to reflect changes since January 25, 

19 2016, in the Consumer Price Index for All 

20 Urban Consumers West Urban 50,000 to 

21 1,500,000 published by the Bureau of Labor 

22 Statistics.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS