P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 10158 Su m m ar y Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. O SCA R JO EL M AR TI N EZ D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or th e N ort h ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 6 : 0 7
- CR- 4 3
- ALL B ef ore SM ITH , ST E W A R T an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * O s c arJ o e lM ar t i ne z a ppe al s f r o m hi s gu i l t y pl e a c o nvic t i o n o f r e c e ivi ng c h ildp o r n o g r a p h ya n da id in ga n da b e tt in g . M a r tin e z co n te n d s th a t h is se nt e nc e , whi c h was wi t hi n t he r e l e v a nt g ui d e l i ne s e nt e nc i ng r a ng e, w as u n r e a s o n a b l e b e c a u s e t h e r e l e v a n tg u i d e l i ne s e n t e n c i n gp r o v i s i o n , U. S . S . G. § 2 G 2. 2, i s i r r at i o naland w as nott he r e s ul to f c ar e f uls t udya nd d e l ibe r at i o n b ut ra th er w a s th e res u l t of C on gr ess i on a lf

i a t; tha t th e d i s tr ict cou rt fa i l edto United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 5, 20 09 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 10158

2 provi de ad equ ate r eason s f or hi s s en t en ce; an d th at th e di st ri ctcourtsentenced hi m as if

t he Sent enc i ng G ui deli nes w er e m andat or y. Fol l ow i ng Un i t ed S t ate s v. B ooker , 543 U . S . 220 ( 200 5) , sentences are rev i ew edfor “rea son a b l en ess . ” Un i t ed S t ate s v. Mares , 40 2 F . 3 d51 1 , 52 0 ( 5 th C i r. 200 5) . U n der theno w - di s c r e ti o nary gui del i n es s chem e, t h e sentenci n g court h a s ad u tyto co n s id e rth e fa c to r s o f 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 (a ) a n d t o co r r e c tly d e te r m i n e th e a p p lic a b le g u id e lin e s ra n g e . Mares , 4 02 F. 3da t5 18
- 19 . Pur s uant t o G all v. Un i t ed S t ate s , 1 28 S. Ct . 5 86 , 5 96
- 97 ( 20 07 ) , t hi s c o ur tm us tde t e r m i ne w he t he rt he s en t en ce i m po s e d i s pr o c e dur all y s o und, i nc l udi ng w he t he rt he cal cul ati on of

t h e adv i sory gu i del i n es ran ge i s c orrec t , an d w h et h er t h e sentence im p o s e dis s u b s ta n tiv e lyre a s o n a b le . R e v ie w is fo rab u s e o f d i s c r e tio n . I d. at 597. M art i n ez rai ses h i s i ssues forthe f i rstt i m e on ap pea l . O u r r evi ew i s f or p la in e r r o r . S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. L opez- V elasqu ez, 5 2 6 F .3d8 0 4 , 8 0 6 (5t h C ir.) , c e r t. d e n ie d, 129 S . C t . 6 25 ( 200 8) . T o sh ow pl ai n err or, an app el l an tm u stshow a f orf ei t ed errort h at i s cl ear or obvious an d that af fect s hi s s u bstanti alri gh t s. P u cket tv. Un i t ed S t ate s , 129 S . C t . 142 3, 142 9 ( 200 9) . I f t h e app el l an tm ak es s u c h as h o w in g , th is co u r t h a s th e d is c r e tio n to co r r e c t t h e e r r o rb u t o n lyif it se r i ou sly af

fec t s t he fai r nes s, i nt egr i t y, orpubl i cr eput at i on o f j udi c i al p r o c e e d in g s . I

d. A se nt e nc e i m po s e d wi t hi n apr o pe r l y c al c ul at e d g ui de l i ne s e nt e nc i ng r a n g e is e n tit le d to a r e b u tt a b le p r e s u m p tio n o f r e a s o n a b le n e s s . Un i t ed S t ate s v. A lon zo , 4 3 5 F .3 d 5 5 1 , 5 5 4 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ); see R i t a v. Un i t ed S t ate s , 12 7 S . C t. 245 6, 246 2 ( 200 7) . “ In ap propri ate c ases, di st ri ct courts cert ai n l y m ay d i sagree w i t h t he G ui del i nes f orpoli c y r eas ons and m ay a dj usta s ent enc e a c c or di ngl y. Butif t he y do not , w e w i l lnotse c o nd- gue s s t he i rde c i s i o ns und e ram o r e l e ni e nt s ta n d a r ds im p lyb e c a u s e th e p a r tic u la rG u id e lin e is n o t e m p ir ic a lly -b a s e d .” Un i t ed S tate s v. Mon d ragon - S an t i ago, F . 3 d , 20 0 9 W L 78 2 8 9 4 , *9 ( 5 th Ci r . M ar . 2 6, 2 00 9) . Thi s c o ur t“w i l lpr e s um e as e nt e nc e w i t h i n t he c ur r e ntN o. 08- 10158

3 ver si on o f th e G ui del i nes t o b e r eas onabl e, and t he def endantm ustr ebutt hat p resu m p ti on to d em on strate s u b stan tive u n rea son a b l en ess . ” I d. M ar t i nez has show n no error , pl ai n or ot h erw i se, as t o w h et h e r h is se n t en ce i s entit l ed to a presum pti on of

reasonab l en ess. T h e d istr ict co u rt a t se n te n cin gh a d befor e it th e p re se n te n ce re p o rt (P S R ), M art i n ez’ s m ot i on fora d epa rt u re or v ari an ce, a n d t h e G overnm en t ’ s r espon se t o t hatm o t i o n. The di s t r i c tc o ur ta do pt e d the c al c ul at i o ns a nd r e as o ni ng o f t he P SR a nd l i s t e ne d t o M ar t i ne z ’ s pa r t i c ul ar ar gum e nt s f o r a de pa r t ur e or vari an ce. Th e di st rictcourtsai d n ot h i n g abou tt h e m ot i o n fo r a d e p art u re or va r i anc e , b utdi d st at e t hatt he s e nt e nc e s e rve d the g o al s o f pun i s hm e nta nd deterr en ce. Th e di st ri ctcourt ’ s r eason f or th e sentence w as explai n ed a d e q u a te ly . S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. R od rigu ez, 5 2 3 F .3 d5 1 9 , 5 2 5 -2 6 (5 th C ir .), ce rt. de ni e d, 1 2 9 S . C t. 6 2 4 (20 0 8 ). M ar t i ne z do e s no tdir e c tt hi s c o ur tt o a ny pa r t i c ul ars t at e m en t s by t he di st r i c tc our ts ugges t i ng t hati tw as s ent enc i ng hi m under a m i st aken be l i ef t hat t h e S en t en ci n g G u i del i n es w ere m an da t ory, a n dh is c o n te n tio n h a s n o b a s is in fac t . The di st r i c tc our ts ai d not hi ng att he s ent enc i ng hear i ng s ugges t i ng t hat i t view ed th e G u i d eli n es as m a n d a tory , a n d i t a d m on i sh ed M a rti n e z a t h is r ear r ai gnm entt hatt he G ui del i nes w er e a dvi so r y o nl y. AF F I RMED.