alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Annette Douglas v. Anthony J. Douglas

Appellate case number: 01

- 10

- 00477

- CV

Trial court case number: 20 09

- 68489

Trial court: 310th District Court of Harris County

Th i s case involves an appeal from a judgment signed on May 4, 2010 . The record was
due on July 5, 2010

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 4.1(a), 35.1. The clerk’s record was filed on October 4,
2012 . The reporter’s record has not been filed.

On June 30 , 201 0 , the court reporter responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the Court that appellant had not made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. On August 6, 2012, this Court affirmed the trial court’s order sustaining a contest to appellant’s affidavit of indigence and ordered appellant to provide proof of having paid or made payment
arrangements for preparation of the reporter’s record by September 5 , 2012 , or the Court would consider and decide only those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a
decision

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c).

Appellant has not provided the Court with evidence showing that she has paid or made arrangements to pay the court reporter . Accordingly, the Court will consider and decide on ly those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See id

.
Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the date of this order. See
T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed wi thin 30 days of the filing of appellant’s brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(b)

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice James Sharp, Jr.  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 24 , 2012
#### Christopher Anthony JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rochelle L. NELSON; Regina L. Floyd; Cathy Scott; Greg Jolly; City of Las Vegas Nevada; Las Vegas Metro Police Dept., Defendants-Appellees, and Sprint Telephone Inc.; the Las Vegas Review Journal; the Las Vegas Sun Newspaper, Inc.; Patricia Lynch, Reno City Attorney; Jane Doe # 1; Jane Doe # 2; John Doe # 1; John Doe # 2, Defendants.

No. 00-16742.

D.C. No. CV-00-00783-PMP/LRL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2001.1

Decided March 26, 2001.

Before WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

Christopher Anthony Jones, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing on the pleadings his removed action alleging that defendants conspired to deny him his civil rights with respect to a 9-1-1 call that his fiancee made before he fatally shot her. *476We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal on the pleadings, *McGann v. Ernst & Young,*102 F.3d 390, 392 (9th Cir.1996), and we affirm.

We agree with the district court that Jones’ complaint is time-barred because he failed to file it within two years of the 1995 events at issue. *See Perez v. Seevers,*869 F.2d 425, 426 (9th Cir.1989) (per curiam). Jones’ contentions that equitable tolling should apply or that Cathy Scott should not have been dismissed as a defendant are not persuasive.

AFFIRMED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 23
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  1.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-14177) pertaining to The Molex
Incorporated Stock Purchase Plan,
 2.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-38259) pertaining to The 1990 Molex
Incorporated Stock Option Plan,
 3.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-68481) pertaining to The 1998 Molex
Incorporated Stock Option Plan,
 4.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-44652) pertaining to The 1991 Molex
Incorporated Incentive Stock Option Plan,
 5.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-55700) pertaining to The 2000 Molex
Incorporated Long-Term Stock Plan,
 6.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-111014) pertaining to The 2000 Molex
Incorporated Long-Term Stock Plan,
 7.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-129559) pertaining to the 2005 Molex
Employee Stock Award Plan,
 8.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-129560) pertaining to the 2005 Molex
Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
 9.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-129561) pertaining to the 2005 Molex
Incentive Stock Option Plan,
 10.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-129562) pertaining to the Amended
and Restated 2000 Molex Long-Term Stock Plan, and
 11.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-138901) pertaining to the 2000 Molex
Incorporated Incentive Stock Option Plan, the Molex 2005 Outside Directors Deferred
compensation Plan and the Molex Deferred Compensation Plan,
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * DAVID WALLACE, * * No. 12- 888 V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran *

v. * Filed: September 4, 2015 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Attorneys’ fees and costs; award * in the amount to which Respondent. * respondent does not object. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Danielle Anne Strait

, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA Washington, DC, for Petitioner; Traci R. Patton, U.S. Dep ’ t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS 1

On September 2, 2015

, petitioner filed a stipulation of fact concerning final attorneys’ fees and costs in the above -captioned matter. Previously, petitioner submitted a draft application to respondent for review and after informal discussions regarding objections raised by respondent, petitioner agreed to amend his application to seek $35,912.50 for attorneys’ fees and costs. Respondent found petitioner’s application to be reasonable. The Court awards this amount.

On December 17, 2012

, David Wallace filed a petition for compensation alleging that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which he received between October 7, 2011 and October 14, 2011, caused him to suffer Guillain

- Barr é s yndrome (“GBS”). Petitioner received compensation based upon the parties’ stipulation. Decision

, issue d June 4 , 201 5 . Because petitioner received compensation, he is entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(e).

1 The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.Petitioner seeks a total of $35,912.50 in atto rneys’ fees and costs for his

counsel. Additionally, in compliance with General Order No. 9, petitioner states that he did not incur any in out

- of

- pocket litigation expenses while pursuing this claim. Respondent has no objection to the amount requested for attorneys’ fees and costs.

After reviewing the request, the Court awards the following:

A lump sum of $35,912.50 in the form of a check made payable to petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, Maglio Christopher & Toale, P.A. , for attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs available under 4 2 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(e).

The Court thanks the parties for their cooperative efforts in resolving this matter. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Shannon Proctor, at (202) 357- 63 60

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master
<PAGE>


        STATE OF DELAWARE
       SECRETARY OF STATE
    DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
   FILED 09:02 AM 10/13/1999
      991431223 - 3089499

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF THE
                     RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                               PRX HOLDINGS, INC.

     PRX Holdings, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation")

     DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     FIRST: The name of the Corporation is PRX Holdings, Inc.

     SECOND: The date on which the Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware is
August 27, 1999, under the name of PRX Holdings, Inc., and the date on which the
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was filed with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware is October 6, 1999.

     THIRD: The Board of Directors of the Corporation adopted a resolution
setting forth a proposed amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporarion
of the Corporation (the "Certificate"), declaring said amendment to be advisable
and in the best interests of the Corporation and its stockholders and
authorizing the appropriate officers of the Corporation to solicit the consent
of the stockholders therefor, which proposed amendment is as follows:

                                   "ARTICLE I

               The name of this corporation is PlanetRx.com, Inc."

     FOURTH: That thereafter said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware by written consent of the stockholders holding the requisite number of
shares required by statute given in accordance with and pursuant to Section 228
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.



<PAGE>


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PRX Holdings, Inc. has caused this Certificate of
Amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be signed by its Chief
Executive Officer and attested to by its Secretary this l3th day of October,
1999.

                                          PRX HOLDINGS, INC

                                          By: /s/ William J. Razzouk
                                             ------------------------------
                                              William J. Razzouk
                                              Chief Executive Officer

ATTEST:

By: /s/ Steve Valenzuela
   ----------------------
   Steve Valenzuela
   Secretary
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

| | William C. Owens as Chief Executive Officer and President of Owens Financial Group, Inc., the General Partner of Owens Mortgage Investment Fund, a California Limited Partnership (the Registrant), and Bryan H. Draper, as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Owens Financial Group, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (1) the Registrants Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the applicable requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ William C. OwensWilliam C. Owens Chief Executive Officer and President of Owens Financial Group, Inc., General PartnerNovember 12, 2004
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Bryan H. DraperBryan H. Draper Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Owens Financial Group, Inc., General Partner November 12, 2004
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.1

In connection with the Annual Report of Global Diversified Industries (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Phil
Hamilton, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The Information contained in the Report fairly represents, in
                  all material aspects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                                                    By: /s/  Phil Hamilton
                                                        --------------------
                                                    Phil Hamilton, President
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1650 

To allow certain qualified law enforcement officers and retired law enforcement officers to carry a concealed firearm to protect children in a 

school zone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2023 

Mr. PFLUGER (for himself, Ms. MALLIOTAKIS, Mr. BACON, and Ms. TENNEY) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To allow certain qualified law enforcement officers and retired law enforcement officers to carry a concealed firearm to protect children in a school zone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Police Officers Pro5 tecting Children Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1650 IH

1 SEC. 2. CERTAIN QUALIFIED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFI2 CERS AND RETIRED LAW ENFORCEMENT OF3 FICERS ALLOWED TO CARRY A CONCEALED 

4 FIREARM, AND DISCHARGE A FIREARM, IN A 

5 SCHOOL ZONE. 

6 Section 922(q) of title 18, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (2)(B)— 

9 (A) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause 

10 (vi); and 

11 (B) by redesignating clause (vii) as clause 

12 (ix) and inserting after clause (vi) the following: 

13 ‘‘(vii) by a qualified law enforcement offi14 cer (as defined in section 926B) who is author15 ized under such section to carry a concealed 

16 firearm, if the firearm is concealed; 

17 ‘‘(viii) by a qualified retired law enforce18 ment officer (as defined in section 926C) who 

19 is authorized under such section to carry a con20 cealed firearm, if the firearm is concealed; or’’; 

21 and 

22 (2) in paragraph (3)(B)— 

23 (A) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause 

24 (iii); 

25 (B) by striking the period at the end of 

26 clause (iv) and inserting a semicolon; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1650 IH

1 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(v) by a qualified law enforcement officer 

3 (as defined in section 926B) who is authorized 

4 under such section to carry a concealed firearm; 

5 or 

6 ‘‘(vi) by a qualified retired law enforcement 

7 officer (as defined in section 926C) who is au8 thorized under such section to carry a concealed 

9 firearm.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of 

Spinnaker Exploration Company: 

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-89894) on Form S-3 and in the registration statements (No. 333-105461, 333-89779, 333-36592 and 333-61888) on Form S-8 of Spinnaker Exploration Company and subsidiaries of our reportsdated March 11, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Spinnaker Exploration Company as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, equity and cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended December 31, 2004, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Spinnaker Exploration Company. Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to a change in the method of accounting for asset retirement obligations,effective January 1, 2003. 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

Houston, Texas 

March 14, 2005
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 164 

To provide appropriations for a border wall and provide for a moratorium 

on certain other funding, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. GOOD of Virginia (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. TIFFANY, Mr. 

GAETZ, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, and Mr. MASSIE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and 

in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide appropriations for a border wall and provide 

for a moratorium on certain other funding, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Close Biden’s Open 

5 Border Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BORDER WALL FUNDING. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—There is appropriated, out of any 

8 amounts in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 164 IH

1 $15,000,000,000 for the Secretary of Homeland Security 

2 to construct a border wall along the southern border of 

3 the United States. To the extent available, such amounts 

4 shall be derived from the unobligated balance of amounts 

5 appropriated (as of the day before the date of the enact6 ment of this Act) for the purpose described in subsection 

7 (b). 

8 (b) MORATORIUM.—Notwithstanding any other pro9 vision of law, no amounts may be authorized to be appro10 priated or otherwise made available, during the 2-year pe11 riod beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, 

12 for United States contributions to the United Nations. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Amendment to Rights Agreement dated December 1, 2005


 Exhibit 4.4 
  

AMENDMENT TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT 
  
 Amendment, dated as of December 1, 2005, to the Rights Agreement, dated as of December 8, 1995 (the “Rights Agreement”), as amended as
of August 22, 2002 and January 1, 2003, between Lyondell Chemical Company (formerly Lyondell Petrochemical Company), a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, a New York banking
corporation, as Rights Agent (the “Rights Agent”). 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company entered into the Rights Agreement specifying the terms of the Rights, amended the Rights Agreement as of August 22, 2002 to provide, among other things, that holders of Series B Common Stock would be in the same
position as holders of Common Stock with respect to the Rights, and amended the Rights Agreement as of January 1, 2003 to substitute the Rights Agent; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual agreements set forth herein and in the Rights Agreement, the parties hereby agree as follows:

  
 Section 1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used
and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning assigned to such terms in the Rights Agreement. 
  
 Section 2. Amendments to Rights Agreement. The Rights Agreement is hereby amended as set forth in this Section 2. 
  

	 	(a)	The definition of “Final Expiration Date” in Section 1 of the Rights Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

  
 “Final Expiration Date” shall mean the close of business on
December 8, 2015.” 
  
 Section 3.
Miscellaneous. 
  

	 	(a)	The term “Agreement” as used in the Rights Agreement shall be deemed to refer to the Rights Agreement as heretofore amended and as amended hereby.


  

	 	(b)	The foregoing amendment shall be effective as of the date first above written, and, except as set forth herein, the Rights Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall
be otherwise unaffected hereby. 

  

	 	(c)	This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all for which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


  

	 	(d)	 This Amendment shall be deemed to be a contract made under the laws of the State of Delaware and for all purposes shall be governed by and construed in 









 
accordance with the laws of such State applicable to contracts to be made and performed entirely within such State. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed as of the day and year first above written. 
  

					
	 	  	LYONDELL CHEMICAL COMPANY
			
	 	  	By:	  	/s/ Kerry A. Galvin
	 	  	Name:	  	Kerry A. Galvin
	 	  	Title:	  	Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

  

					
	 	  	AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY
			
	 	  	By:	  	/s/ Herbert J. Lemmer
	 	  	Name:	  	Herbert J. Lemmer
	 	  	Title:	  	Vice President
#### Abe Boyd, et al., *v.*C. H. Adams, et al.

Costs — Taxation by Clerk of Court of Appeals.

The clerk of the court of appeals, like the clerks of other courts, is authorized to tax as costs one copy of any pleadings or exhibits obtained by the successful party.

APPEAL FROM McCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT.

March 24, 1876.

*L. D. Husband, A. Duvall, for appellants.*

*J. W. Bloomñeld, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

Section 32, chap. 26, General Statutes, authorizes clerks to tax as costs “one copy of any pleadings or exhibits obtained by the successful party or parties.” This provision applies to all clerks, and must, therefore, include the clerk of this court. Copy of the record on file is substantially a copy of the pleadings and exhibits in the cause, and it comes within the letter and spirit of the section referred to.

The one file is not the property or record of the appellant. It is a public record, over which he has no control. He may have a copy of it, in order that he may prepare his appeal for hearing, and if he succeeds in reversing the judgment appealed from, the expense legally incurred in obtaining said copy may be taxed as costs in his favor. The costs of no more than one copy can be taxed, however numerous the appellants may be.

The motion to correct the taxation of costs in this case is overruled.