alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                JUL-22-2000
<CASH>                                           18,630
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    40,607
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                     127,934
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                193,711
<PP&E>                                          865,727
<DEPRECIATION>                                  513,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  749,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           163,761
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                            300
<OTHER-SE>                                      (54,462)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    749,533
<SALES>                                         657,987
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                657,987
<CGS>                                           475,153
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   475,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                219,499
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               15,024
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (51,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (51,689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (51,689)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (1.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (1.72)



</TABLE>
Doral Financial Corporation
Computation of Ratio of Earnings (Losses) to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
 For the nine month period endedSeptember 30, 2010Including Interest on DepositsEarnings
(Losses):Pre-tax loss from continuing operations
    
    $
    (244,914
    )Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    187,947Total
Earnings (Losses)
    
    $
    (56,967
    )Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    185,825Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    366An estimate of the interest component within rental expense
    
    
    1,756Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    187,947Preferred dividends
    
    
    6,694Ratio of pre tax loss to net loss
    
    
    0.96Preferred dividend factor
    
    
    6,426Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividens
    
    $
    194,373Ratio of
Earnings (Losses) to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
    
    
    (A
    )Excluding Interest on DepositsEarnings
(Losses):Pre-tax loss from continuing operations
    
    $
    (244,914
    )Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    104,740Total
Earnings (Losses)
    
    $
    (140,174
    )Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    102,618Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    366An estimate of the interest component within rental expense
    
    
    1,756Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    104,740Preferred dividends
    
    
    6,694Ratio of pre tax loss to net loss
    
    
    0.96Preferred dividend factor
    
    
    6,426Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividens
    
    $
    111,166Ratio of
Earnings (Losses) to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
    
    
    (A
    )
 
 (A)
    
    Due to the Companys pre-tax loss for the nine month period ended September 30,
2010 the ratio coverage was less than 1:1. The Company would have to generate additional earnings
of $251.3 million to achieve a ratio of 1:1 during the nine month period ended September 30, 2010. 122
11620.

#### DeBeaugrine *v.*Ward.

Stephens, J.

1. Where a written contract is incomplete and its meaning is uncertain and left to inference, extrinsic evidence is competent for the purpose, of showing the intent of the parties and establishing the full meaning of the contract. This being a suit growing out of an alleged breach by the defendant of a contract, where the plaintiff claimed that he was employed by the defendant for the purpose of operating a dairy belonging to the defendant and was to rece-iye fox- his services a certain *302percentage of the output and. increase in the cattle, and the defendant was to furnish all equipment, stock, tools, etc., including the entire feed for the cattle, and where the defendant contended that the entire contract was contained in a letter from the plaintiff, introduced in evidence, and the letter being silent as to a necessary element of the contract, viz. the furnishing of feed for the cattle, there was, from the nature and character of the transaction, an ambiguity in the contract, as to which party should furnish the feed for the cattle, and extrinsic evidence was competent and was properly admitted for the purpose of supplying the deficiency in the language of the contract and establishing the true intent and meaning of the parties. Such evidence raising an issue of fact as to the true intent of the parties, the question as to the interpretation of the contract was properly submitted to the jury.

Decided February 15, 1921.

Complaint; from Chattooga superior court — Judge Wright. May *4,*1930.

*Rosser & Shaw,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. M. Bellah, Maddox & Royal,*contra.

2. The alleged newly discovered evidence, being an account book kept by the plaintiff, showing certain amounts of cattle feed bought from day to day during the life of the contract, without any indication of the significance of such entries, is perfectly consistent with the contention of the plaintiff that the defendant was to furnish all the feed for the cattle; it is merely cumulative, and is not of such a nature as would likely produce a different result, and besides it could by ordinary diligence have been discovered before the trial. The discretion of the trial judge was not abused in refusing a.new trial on this ground.

3. The verdict for the plaintiff is supported by the evidence, and, no error of law appearing, it was not error to overrule the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

4. The defendant’s motion for damages for delay is denied.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and*Sill, *J., concitr.*
**Exhibit15.1**

 

 

 

TheBoard of Directors

InternetGold-Golden Lines Ltd.

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-208404 and 333-215744) on Form F-3 ofInternet Gold-Golden Lines Ltd. of our report dated April 26, 2017, with respect to the consolidated statements of financialposition of Internet Gold-Golden Lines Ltd. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements ofincome, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December31, 2016, which report appears in the December 31, 2016 annual report on Form 20-F of Internet Gold-Golden LinesLtd.

 

 

/s/SomekhChaikin

Somekh Chaikin

CertifiedPublic Accountants (Israel)

Member Firmof KPMG International

 

Tel Aviv,Israel

April 26,2017
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of World Monitor Trust II  Series F for the period January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer
|Name:                 |  | Kenneth A. Shewer                    
|Title:                |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer           
|                      |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        
|                      |  | Preferred Investment Solutions Corp.,
|                      |  | Managing Owner of                    
|                      |  | World Monitor Trust II  Series F    
|                      | 
|Date:                 |  | March 20, 2009
[Exhibit 32.1]

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of BF Acquisition Group
V,  Inc.  (the "Company")  on Form 10-KSB  for the period  ending
April  30,  2004  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Colucci,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and
          (2)  The  information contained in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 16, 2004
                                  /s/ William Colucci
                                  ------------------------------
                                  William Colucci, President
                                  BF Acquisition Group III, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection
with the Quarterly Report of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. (CRM) on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence Fensterstock, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge: (1)
The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:
/s/
Lawrence
  FensterstockLawrence
  FensterstockChief
  Financial OfficerMay 15, 2007 19
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29935]



[[Page 77094]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the Federal Register notice that was originally published 
on December 10, 2014, (Volume 79, Number 237, Page 73404) the meeting 
location was inadvertently omitted. The location of the meeting is: 
Albuquerque, New Mexico.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, January 15, 2015, through 
Friday, January 16, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Billups at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(214) 413-6523.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee will be held Thursday, January 15, 
2015, from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and Friday, January 16, 2015, from 
8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Mountain Time in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The 
public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements 
for consideration. Notification of intent to participate must be made 
with Lisa Billups. For more information please contact: Lisa Billups at 
1-888-912-1227 or 214-413-6523, or write TAP Office 1114 Commerce 
Street, Dallas, TX 75242-1021, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The committee will be discussing various issues related to Taxpayer 
Communications and public input is welcome.

    Dated: December 16, 2014.
Otis Simpson,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2014-29935 Filed 12-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
         CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS
         QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     9,340,100,000
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                  24,900,000
<MORTGAGE>                               1,992,500,000
<REAL-ESTATE>                               74,200,000
<TOTAL-INVEST>                          12,246,600,000
<CASH>                                      27,900,000
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                         224,700,000
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                   1,065,400,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          17,673,400,000
<POLICY-LOSSES>                         11,479,400,000
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                             287,700,000
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                       214,000,00
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                            460,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      241,700,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       400,000
<OTHER-SE>                               1,500,300,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            17,673,400,000
<PREMIUMS>                                 419,800,000
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                        474,700,000
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           2,500,000
<OTHER-INCOME>                             247,000,000
<BENEFITS>                                 638,400,000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                 47,100,000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                       250,700,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            165,400,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                58,400,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        103,200,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               103,200,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.52
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        


</TABLE>
11823.

#### Young-Jones Hardware Co. *v.*Dewey.

Hill, J.

1. Where the judge who heard the motion for a new trial was not the judge who presided at the trial of the case, the rule with reference to the weight of the opinion of the trial judge upon the facts does not have the same broad application. *Monahan*v. *National Realty Co.,*4 *Ga. App.*681(8) (62 S. E. 127) ; *Ford*v. *Harris,*4 *Ga. App.*467 (61 S. E. 881).

2. Where a contract gives to the purchaser of personalty sold under an express warranty the right, upon compliance with specified conditions, to return it to the seller, a mere notice to the latter that the property is held subject to Ms order is not a compliance with the terms of the contract. Nor was a statement by the purchaser that " the machine was down at his farm and that he [the seller] could go down there and get *it"*a compliance with the terms of the contract to *return*the machine to the seller. *Malsby*v. *Young,*104 *Ga.*205 (3) (30 S. E. 854) ; *Case Threshing Machine Co.*v. *Cook,*7 *Ga. App.*635 (67 S. E. 890).

3. Where, in a contract of sale of a machine, it was stipulated that the purchaser should have until a definite time to try the machine, in order to determine if it came up to the express warranty, the definite time of trial was of the essence of the contract, and, if the purchaser retained possession of the machine beyond the time limited, this amounted to an approval of the machine and made the sale absolute. *O’Donnell*v. *Wing,*121 *Ga.*720 (49 S. E. 720) ; *International Filter Co.*v. *LaGrange Ice & Fuel Co.,*22 *Ga. App.*167 (95 S. E. 736).

4. Upon a review of all the evidence the verdict for the plaintiff, which *522was directed by tlie trial judge, was demanded, and tlie judge who heard the motion for a new trial erred in granting another trial.

Decided March 16, 1921.

Complaint; from city court of Quitman — Judge Baum. August If, 1920. ■ : ' -j

Application for certiorari was denied by tlie Supreme Court.

*Bonnet &*Harrell, for plaintiff.

*Morris & Weston, Branch & Snow,*for defendant.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., eoneur.*
Fire Endurance Testing of Floor Truss Assemblies

Prepared by:

Joe Treadway

Fred Hervey

ASTM E119 – Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials

ASTM E119 prescribes a standard fire exposure of controlled extent and severity.

Performance is defined as the period of resistance to standard exposure before the first critical point in behavior (conditionsof acceptance)is observed.

Conditions of acceptance for floor systems include:• Sustained applied load during classification period• No passage of flame or hot gasses• Maximum and average temperatures of the unexposed side of 

the specimen• Maximum and average temperatures of the steel joists

•Two tests conducted in Toronto at ULCAugust 7, 2004 - 35 ft. Restrained Assembly 

August 11, 2004 - 35 ft. Unrestrained Assembly

•Two tests conducted in Northbrook at ULIAugust 19, 2004 - 18 ft. Restrained Assembly

August 25, 2004 - 18 ft. Restrained Assembly (1/2 in. fireproofing)

Testing Summary

WTC Floor Assembly

Test Restraint Conditions

Restrained Test Condition Unrestrained Test Condition

Reaction FrameFloor Slab

Gap

Reaction FrameFloor Slab

Effect of Restraint Against Thermal Expansion

Heated floor assembly wants to expandIf thermal expansion is restrained, forces will developFloor assembly is subjected to fire conditions

Floor Asse

mbly

Span

Furnace

Design and Fabrication of Test Assemblies

Preparation of Test Assemblies

Instrumentation

Each Assembly Contained:

• 159 Thermocouples–44 on Each Main Truss

–~ 6 miles of thermocouple wire

• 2 Plate TC’s, 2 Radiometers, 2 Asp. TC’s

• 15 Deflection Measurements–9 on Unexposed Surface

–6 on Bottom Chords

UL - Northbrook Furnace

UL - Northbrook Furnace with Test Specimen

Loading of Test Assembly - Northbrook

Hydraulic Actuators

Concrete Block

Water-filled Containers

Post Test Observations Test No. 3

Post-Test Observations – Steel Truss Behavior

Post Test Observations - Slab Deflections

Test 1 - before

Test 1 - after

Fire Resistance Ratings

Times to Reach End-Point Criteria (min) Standard Fire Test Rating 

Temperature onUnexposed Surface Steel Temperatures ASTM

E 119-61 ASTM E 119-00

Average(Ambient+250oF)

Maximum(Ambient+325oF)

Average(1100oF)

Maxi-mum

(1300oF)

Rating(hr)

Restr-ained

Rating(hr)

Unrestr-ained

Rating(hr)

1 35 ft, restrained,3⁄4 in fireproofing --- 111 66 62 (3) 116(1) 11⁄2 11⁄2 1

2 35 ft, unrestrained,3⁄4 in fireproofing --- --- 76 62 (3) 146(2) 2 --- 2

3 17 ft, restrained,3⁄4 in fireproofing 180 157 86 76 (3) 210(2) 2 2 1

417 ft, restrained,

1⁄2 in fireproofing --- 58 66 58 (3) 120(1) 3⁄4 3⁄4 3⁄4

Failure to

Support Load

TestTermin-

ated(min)

Test Description

___________________________________________________(1) Imminent collapse(2) Vertical displacement exceeded capability to measure accurately(3) Did not occur

- ASTM E119 – Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials
- WTC Floor Assembly
- Effect of Restraint Against Thermal Expansion