alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. (“CRM”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence
Fensterstock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 By:
      /s/
              Lawrence
      FensterstockLawrence
      FensterstockChief
      Financial Officer
 
 November
12, 2009
 
 This
certification is being furnished to the SEC with this Report pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to
liability of that section.
| 1.   | The                Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  October                31, 2007 | /s/                Joseph D. Reid                                                                                                    Joseph                D. ReidChief                Executive Officer |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, James W. Bernau, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Willamette Valley
Vineyards, Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the
small business issuer and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: Nov 14, 2006
/s/ James W. Bernau
    James W. Bernau,
    Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JEFFERY TAYLOR, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 14-00156-WS-N

)

WANDA LIGHTNER, )

)

Respondent. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having 

been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated April 20, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of 

this Court.

DONE and ORDERED this the 27th day of May, 2015.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00156-WS-N Document 17 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1740 

To amend the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 

to establish payment and performance security requirements for projects, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2023 

Mr. BOST (for himself, Mr. PAPPAS, Mr. BALDERSON, and Mr. LYNCH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation 

Act of 2014 to establish payment and performance security requirements for projects, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR WIFIA ELIGI4 BILITY AND PROJECT SELECTION. 

5 Section 5028(a)(1)(C) of the Water Infrastructure 

6 Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 3907) is 

7 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1740 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and inserting 

2 the following: 

3 ‘‘(i) FINANCING SECURITY FEA4 TURES.—The Secretary’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(ii) CONSTRUCTION PAYMENT AND

7 PERFORMANCE SECURITY.— 

8 ‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—The Sec9 retary or the Administrator, as appli10 cable, shall ensure that the construc11 tion of a project carried out with as12 sistance under this subtitle shall have 

13 payment and performance security. 

14 ‘‘(II) USE OF STATE OR LOCAL

15 REQUIREMENTS.—With respect to the 

16 construction of a project for which 

17 payment and performance security is 

18 required to be furnished by applicable 

19 State or local law, the Secretary or 

20 the Administrator, as applicable, shall 

21 accept such payment and performance 

22 security requirements for purposes of 

23 subclause (I), except that the amount 

24 of any payment and performance se25 curity accepted shall not be less than 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1740 IH

1 50 percent of the total construction 

2 contract amount. 

3 ‘‘(III) USE OF OTHER REQUIRE4 MENTS.—With respect to the con5 struction of a project for which no 

6 State or local payment and perform7 ance security requirements are appli8 cable, the payment and performance 

9 security described in paragraphs (1) 

10 and (2) of section 3131(b) of title 40, 

11 United States Code, shall be required 

12 for purposes of subclause (I).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Kof Huntsman International LLC (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, J. Kimo Esplin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ J. KIMO ESPLIN        |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| J. Kimo Esplin            |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer* |
| March 17, 2006       |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 240 (Monday, December 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 74155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29273]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8973]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Kuba Textiles: Geometry in Form, Space, and Time'' 
Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 
2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the 
exhibition ``Kuba Textiles: Geometry in Form, Space, and Time,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a 
loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine 
that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Neuberger 
Museum of Art, Purchase College, Purchase, New York, from on or about 
February 26, 2015, until on or about June 16, 2015, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including 
lists of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: December 5, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-29273 Filed 12-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

STANLEY D. GILDERSLEEVE, : 

 : 

Plaintiff, : 

 : 

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0505-M 

 : 

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, : 

Commissioner of : 

Social Security, : 

 : 

Defendant. : 

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff's 

Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice 

Act be GRANTED and that Plaintiff's attorney, Byron A. Lassiter, 

be AWARDED an EAJA attorney's fee in the amount of $3,200.00. 

No costs are taxed. 

 DONE this 12th day of July, 2010. 

 s/BERT W. MILLING, JR. 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00505-M Document 28 Filed 07/13/10 Page 1 of 1
#### John Alcorn *v.*James L. O’Bryan.

Appeal — Reversal.

A judgment for a sum greater than is owing by the defendant, and which is a matter of adjudication and not a clerical error, is cause for reversal.

*709APPEAL FROM BULLITT CIRCUIT COURT.

June 4, 1874.

*R. H. Field, for appellant.*

*Meyler, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

The debts sued on are evidenced by two notes, maturing at different dates, with credits endorsed on the note which first matured, which credits are set out in the petition. Instead of rendering judgment for the sums stipulated to be paid in each note, with interest at the rate of six per cent, per annum from their dates, and directing the credits to be entered as set forth, the judgment is for the sum of $682.28, thus showing that the court adjudicated on the question as to the sum due, and fixed the amount to' be collected; that amount is greater than the sum owing by appellant; and the error is in the judgment, and not a mere clerical misprision.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.0

                            BTU INTERNATIONAL , INC.
         CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
             (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         For the Three Months Ended
                                                     --------------------------------
                                                      March 30,           March 31,
                                                        2003                 2002
                                                        ----                 ----
<S>                                                  <C>                 <C>
Net loss                                             $    (1,773)        $    (1,300)

Net loss applicable to
  common stockholders                                $    (1,773)        $    (1,300)
                                                     ===========         ===========
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
   Basic Shares                                        7,002,578           6,840,693

   Effect of Dilutive Options                                  0                   0
                                                     -----------         -----------

   Diluted Shares                                      7,002,578           6,840,693
                                                     ===========         ===========

Loss Per Share

   Basic                                             $     (0.25)        $     (0.19)
                                                     ===========         ===========

   Diluted                                           $     (0.25)        $     (0.19)
                                                     ===========         ===========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
dated March 23, 2006, with respect to the financial statements of CPPC-Decorative Products Co., Ltd., included in this Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. for the year ended November 30, 2005.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-112530 on Form S-3,
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-100558 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-88143 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-88145 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-34938 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-88587 on Form S-3,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-88143 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-34938 on Form S-8,
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated March 23, 2006, with respect to the financial statements of CPPC-Decorative Products Co., Ltd., incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in this Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1)
of OMNOVA Solutions Inc.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young           
|                            
|Ernst & Young Office Limited
|Bangkok, Thailand           
|March 29, 2006
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Myers Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John C. Orr, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to my knowledge:

(1) The Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2012 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                           
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------
|Date October 25, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ John C. Orr           
|                      |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | John C. Orr, President and
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer   

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Myers Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Greggory W. Branning, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to my knowledge:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2012 which this certification accompanies
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                             
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 25, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Greggory W. Branning                                                                    
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Greggory W. Branning, Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 21.01**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF KANA SOFTWARE, INC.**

BROADBASE SOFTWARE, INC. (DELAWARE) 

FOUNDATION CV (NETHERLANDS, RESIDENT IN BARBADOS) 

KANA SOFTWARE PTY LTD.(AUSTRALIA) 

KANA SOFTWARE AUSTRIA GmbH (AUSTRIA) 

KANASOFTWARE B.V. (NETHERLANDS) 

KANA SOFTWARE HONG KONG LIMITED (HONG KONG) 

KANA SOFTWARE BVBA (BELGIUM) 

KANA SOFTWARE CANADA INC. (CANADA) 

KANA SOFTWARE GmbH (GERMANY) 

KANA SOFTWARE INDIA (INDIA) 

KANA SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD. (IRELAND) 

KANA SOFTWARE KK (JAPAN) 

KANA SOFTWARE LTD. (UNITED KINGDOM)
#### James L. Harris *v.*P. J. Honaker.

Arbitration — Written Agreement.

Where by the terms of a written agreement of parties to refer to arbitrators the matters in dispute between them, it was only in case of disagreement between the arbitrators that the umpire selected by them was to act, where there was a disagreement, the parties are entitled to the decision of the umpire alone, and the arbitrators have no further right to participate.

APPEAL FROM HENRY CIRCUIT COURT.

January 9, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

By the terms of the written agreement of the parties to refer to *288arbitrators the matters in dispute between them, it was only in case of disagreement between the chosen arbitrators that the umpire selected by them was to act, and when such disagreement occurred the parties had a right to the decision of the umpire alone made upon his own responsibility according to his own judgment. *Royse’s Adm’r., et al., v. McCall,*5 Bush 695; *Darnel v. Daniel,*6 Dana 93.

*Webb & Masterson, for appellant.*

*DeHavon & Carroll, for appellee.*

When the arbitrators disagreed, they should have withdrawn from any further participation in the matter, and have left the umpire to make his decision; and the fact of their disagreement, and that the decision was that of the umpire, should have been stated in the written award, which should have been signed by all. Instead of doing this, one of the arbitrators seems to have united with the umpire in making the award, which may be the result of mutual concessions between them instead of being the decision of the umpire alone.

Judgment *affirmed.*