alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                120,784
<SECURITIES>                        1,581,725
<RECEIVABLES>                          15,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      388,269
<PP&E>                             26,361,521
<DEPRECIATION>                      8,259,087
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     20,115,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 592,281
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                              449,245
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                         12,899,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       20,115,151
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    3,404,124
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       1,765,070
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    497,161
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     1,639,054
<INCOME-TAX>                          599,951
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 1,039,103
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                        1,039,103
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            2.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                            2.30

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 160 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 160

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on 
      deduction for State and local taxes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

Mr. Mike Garcia of California introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on 
      deduction for State and local taxes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``SALT Fairness Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON DEDUCTION FOR STATE AND LOCAL, ETC. 
              TAXES.

    (a) In General.--Section 164(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking paragraph (6).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in section 11042 of Public Law 115-97.
                                 <all>
```
#### THE STATE ex rel. ECKHARD, Appellant, v. HAWES et al.

In Banc,

November 3, 1903.

The judgment in this ease is affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Rife v. Hawes, reported at page 360 of this volume.

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court.— *Hon. Wm. Zaehrits,*Judge.

Affirmed.

*Joseph Wheless*for appellant.

*C. W. Bates*and *Wm. F. Woerner*for respondents.

GANTT, J.

Mandamus for $1,918.72, for salary for relator and two others. Judgment for defendants, and relator appealed.

They had all fully served their appointed terms, and were merely holdovers when they were dropped. The case of State ex rel. Rife v. Hawes, reported at page 360 of this volume, applies to this case. The judgment of the circuit court is for the right party, and it is affirmed.

All concur.
#### The State, ex rel. Ford, *v.*The Kankakee Valley Draining Company.

*Jurisdiction.—Court of Common Pleas.—Qzio*Warranto.—The court of common pleas had jurisdiction to hear and determine an action in the nature of a *quo •warranto,*and the information. in such case might be filed by the district attorney.

APPEAL from the La Porte Common Pleas.

Worden, J.

This was an information brought by the appellant against the appellee, in the nature of a *quo warranto,*the object of which was to obtain a judgment declaring the corporate existence of the defendant dissolved, etc.. Demurrers were filed to the information, but these, before being passed upon, were withdrawn, and on motion of the defendant the action was dismissed, apparently on the ground either that the court had not jurisdiction of the subject of the action, or that it could not be brought upon the relation of the district attorney of the common pleas district. The appellant excepted.

As the statute on the subject of information originally stood, it was, perhaps, contemplated that proceedings should be had under it in the circuit court only, and hence it was provided, that the information might be filed by the prosecuting attorney in the circuit court of the proper county, upon his own relation, whenever he should deem it his duty to do so, or when he should be directed by the court or other competent authority to do so. 2 G. & H. 323, sec. 750. But in the case of *Gass*v. *The State, ex rel. Clark,*34 Ind. 425, it was held that a later statute, 2 G. & H. 22, extended the jurisdiction of the court of common pleas to cases of this description. There is another case, that of *Yonkey*v. *The State, etc.,*27 Ind. 236, which was overlooked at the time the case in 34 Ind. was decided, that clearly sustains the jurisdiction of the common pleas. The case originated in the.common pleas, but was reversed in this court and remanded for a new trial. The question of jurisdiction does’' *354not seem to have been made, although the case was closely-contested; but this court must have been of opinion that the common pleas had jurisdiction, otherwise the cause would not have been remanded to that court for a new trial therein.

*W. H.*Calkins, for appellant.

The court of common pleas having jurisdiction, we think it necessarily follows that the information may be filed in that court by the district attorney, in the same manner as it might be filed by the prosecuting attorney in the circuit court. It is the duty of the prosecuting attorney to prosecute the pleas of the State in the circuit courts of his circuit, and of the district attorney to prosecute the pleas of the State in the courts of common pleas of his district. 2 G. & H. 431, sec. 1.

We have not examined any question as to the sufficiency of the facts stated in the information, as no such question arises on the motion to dismiss.

Wc are of opinion that the court erred in dismissing the action.

The judgment below dismissing the action is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Osborn, C. J., did not participate in the decision of this cause.
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1650, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   I, Brian R. McEwen, President and Chief Executive Officer of Buffalo Gold Ltd. (the Company), certify that to the best of my knowledge:  1. the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Brian R. McEwen  Brian R. McEwen Chief Executive Officer June 27, 2008                  ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Buffalo Gold Ltd.  December 31, 2007 20F Page 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
U,m

__________

United States Department of Com

National Institute of Standards and Technolo

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For: 

South Dakota 

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international 

system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, andhas demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate. 

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope 

Mass Echelon II Mass Echelon III Volume Transfer, II 5 kg to 1 mg 30 kg to 1 mg 1500 gal to 50 gal

10 lb to 0.001 lb 1000 lb to 0.001 lb 5 gal

8 oz to 0.03125 oz 8 oz to 0.03125 oz Volume Transfer, LPG 

Weight Carts 100 gal to 25 gal Katrice Lipp

NIST Office 

5000 lb to 2000 lb

Effective Dat

(Rev.: September 2021)
**EXHIBIT 15**

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of

Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York:

 

 

We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interimfinancial information of Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York for theperiods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, as indicated in our report datedNovember 2, 2007; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinionon that information.

 

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included inyour Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, isincorporated by reference in the following Registration Statements:

 
| **Form S-3 Registration Statement Nos.** | ** ** | **Form N-4 Registration Statement Nos.** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
| 333-58512                                               |       | 033-65381                                          |
| 333-100029                                                   |       | 333-68344                                          |
|                                                         |       | 333-81970                                          |
|                                                         |       | 333-94785                                          |
|                                                         |       | 333-143228                                                   |

 

 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of theRegistration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a reportprepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11of that Act.

 

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

November 2, 2007

 

E-2

----
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

[TYPE]EX-27
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted
from SEC Form 10-Q ended 9/30/95 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000840824
<NAME> THE SOFTWARE DEVELOPER'S COMPANY, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996             MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995             SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         981,233                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,586,405                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   460,499                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,697,293                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,193,090                       0
<PP&E>                                         448,810                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,692,690                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,616,140                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,299,949                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<COMMON>                                        74,697                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,610                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,616,140                       0
<SALES>                                     13,360,696              26,567,185
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,360,696              26,567,185
<CGS>                                       10,880,190              21,579,599
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,298,505              26,308,575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,273                  81,555
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,918                 176,055
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,918                 176,055
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,918                 176,055
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00                    0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00                    0.02
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Narsi Narayanan, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of ClearOne Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ClearOne Communications, Inc.









|                |     |                                                                                        | 
|--------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|August 14, 2012 | By: | /s/ Narsi Narayanan                                                                    | 
|                |     | Narsi Narayanan
Vice President of Finance
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                    FIDUCIARY CAPITAL PENSION PARTNERS, L.P.


                         STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET
                          INVESTMENT INCOME PER LIMITED
                                PARTNERSHIP UNIT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    For the Three Months                  For the Nine Months
                                                    Ended September 30,                    Ended September 30,
                                             --------------------------------      ---------------------------------
                                                  1999               1998              1999                 1998
                                             -------------      -------------      -------------       -------------
<S>                                          <C>                <C>                <C>                 <C>
Net Investment (Loss) Income                 $    (126,984)     $      27,657      $    (180,511)      $      85,585

Percentage Allocable to Limited Partners               100%                99%               100%                 99%
                                             -------------      -------------      -------------       -------------

Net Investment (Loss) Income Allocable
   to Limited Partners                       $    (126,984)     $      27,380      $    (180,511)      $      84,729
                                             =============      =============      =============       =============

Weighted Average Number of Limited
   Partnership Units Outstanding                   940,336          1,020,142            940,336           1,020,142
                                             =============      =============      =============       =============

Net Investment (Loss) Income Per Limited
   Partnership Unit                          $        (.14)     $         .03      $        (.19)      $         .08
                                             =============      =============      =============       =============
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

# AGENCY:

Corporate Senior Executive Management Office, Department of Veterans Affairs.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4) agencies are required to publish a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         of the appointment of Performance Review Board (PRB) members. This notice announces the appointment of persons to serve on the PRB of the Department of Veterans Affairs.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         December 12, 2014.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Corporate Senior Executive Management Office, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Contact Tia N. Butler, Executive Director, Corporate Senior Executive Management Office (052), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-7865. (This is not a toll free number.)

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The membership of the Department of Veterans Affairs Performance Review Board is as follows:

Gina Farrisee (Chair)

A. Jacy Thurmond, Jr.

Danny Pummill

Patricia C. Vandenberg

Ron Walters

Arthur Gonzalez

Elisa Basnight

Georgia Coffey

## Signing Authority

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jose D. Riojas, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this document on December 9, 2014, for publication.

Dated: December 10, 2014.

William F. Russo,

Acting Director, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2014-29262 Filed 12-11-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
1

The Honorable Charles B. Kornmann, United States District Judge for the

District of South Dakota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3294

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of South Dakota.

Brian Bear Heels, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: October 20, 2006

 Filed: October 31, 2006

___________

Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Brian Bear Heels appeals the sentence the district court1

 imposed after he

pleaded guilty to second degree murder, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153, 1111, and

2. His counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Bear

Heels objects to counsel’s request to withdraw.

Bear Heels’s plea agreement contains a valid appeal waiver. See United States

v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enforceability of
-2-

appeal waiver); see also United States v. Estrada-Bahena, 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th

Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal waiver in Anders case). Having reviewed

the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), for any

nonfrivolous issues not covered by the appeal waiver, we find none. Accordingly, we

enforce the waiver, and dismiss the appeal. We also grant counsel leave to withdraw.

______________________________