alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                               
<ARTICLE>                                           5
                                                     
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                     132,615
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               73,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             884,362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               884,362
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             1,858
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          (112,641)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             56,601
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                56,601
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 2.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 2.11
        
 

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2


 


ATRINSIC, INC.


 


65 Atlantic Avenue


Boston, Massachusetts 02110


 


May 15, 2015


Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd.


777 Third Avenue, 30th Floor


New York, NY 10017


Attn.: Mr. Yoav Roth


 


Re: Amendment to First Amended
and Restated Security Agreement


 


Dear Mr. Roth:


 


Reference is made to the incremental $50,000.00
loan from Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd. to Atrinsic, Inc. being funded today which will be evidenced by a Secured Promissory Note
of even date herewith. We hereby confirm that “Notes” as defined in the First Amended and Restated Security Agreement
dated December 18, 2014 shall be amended to include all of the notes described on Exhibit A hereto.


 


Except as modified hereby, the First Amended
and Restated Security Agreement dated December 18, 2014 shall remain in full force and effect.


 


	 	Sincerely,	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Edward Gildea	 
	 	Edward Gildea,	 
	 	President	 


 


Agreed to and Accepted:


 


Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd.


 


	By:	/s/ Yoav Roth	 	 
	 	Yoav Roth, Authorized Signatory	 	 


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


Exhibit A


 


Notes Covered by First Amended and Restated
Security Agreement


by and between 


Atrinsic, Inc., Iroquois Master Fund LTD
and Hudson Bay Master Fund LTD


 


	Note
    Date	 	Holder	 	Note
    Amount	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	2/11/2014	 	Hudson
    Bay Master Fund LTD	 	$	87,500.00	 
	2/11/2014	 	Iroquois Master
    Fund LTD	 	$	87,500.00	 
	8/15/2014	 	Hudson Bay Master
    Fund LTD	 	$	45,000.00	 
	8/15/2014	 	Iroquois Master
    Fund LTD	 	$	45,000.00	 
	12/18/2014	 	Hudson Bay Master
    Fund LTD	 	$	75,000.00	 
	12/18/2014	 	Iroquois Master
    Fund LTD	 	$	75,000.00	 
	5/15/2015	 	Hudson Bay Master
    Fund LTD	 	$	50,000.00	 
	5/15/2015	 	Iroquois Master
    Fund LTD	 	$	50,000.00
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7850

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MILTON G. DEOLIVEIRA, a/k/a Milton G. DeOlivera,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CR-92-147)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 19, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Milton G. DeOliveira, Appellant Pro Se. Robert William Wiechering,

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Milton G. DeOliveira seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

all pending motions, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United

States v. DeOliveira, No. CR-92-147 (E.D. Va. Nov. 5, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
GERALD E. MOBLEY

, Appellant,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF THE CWABS, INC. ASSET

BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007

- 8,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, ST ATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2486

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 16, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua Coun ty

. Toby S. Monaco , Judge

. Gerald E. Mobley, pro se

, Appellant.

Toby Foor

- Pessin and Charles P. Gufford, of McCalla Raymer, LLC, Orlando; and Daniel F. Blanks of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Jacksonville , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Having con sidered appellant’s response to the Court’s order of June 4, 2015,

the appeal is dismissed as untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). The dismissal is2 without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek relief in the trial court. Williams v.

Roundtree , 464 S o. 2d 1293 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Snelson v. Snelson , 440 So. 2d

477 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

LEWIS, BILBREY, and KELSEY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 11.1




                        FIDUCIARY CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.


                        STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET
                         INVESTMENT INCOME PER LIMITED
                                PARTNERSHIP UNIT
               FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND 1996


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              1997          1996
                                           ----------    ----------

<S>                                        <C>           <C>       
Net Investment Income                      $  183,035    $  299,197

Percentage Allocable to Limited Partners           99%           99%
                                           ----------    ----------

Net Investment Income Allocable
   to Limited Partners                     $  181,205    $  296,205
                                           ==========    ==========

Weighted Average Number of Limited
   Partnership Units Outstanding            1,299,176     1,407,244
                                           ==========    ==========

Net Investment Income Per Limited
   Partnership Unit                        $      .14    $      .21
                                           ==========    ==========
</TABLE>
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Clare, Appellant.

(No. 2442

Decided April 27, 1951.)

*287*Mr. John Rossetti,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Foster J. Flucline,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Amerman, Jones <& Morgan*and *Mr. D. Q.. Gennett,*for appellant.

Montgomery, J.

The appellant was convicted in the Court of Common Pleas of Stark County of the crime of murder in the second degree and was sentenced accordingly. This appeal ensued.

We have read the record in this case and considered all the alleged errors. With one exception, with which we will deal more at length, we find nothing prejudicially erroneous. It certainly does not affirmatively appear from the record that the accused was prejudiced by the admission or rejection of any evidence offered against or for him, or that he was prejudiced by any instruction to the jury.

Consequently, under Section 13449-5, General Code, there should not and will not be a reversal on any of these claimed grounds.

The serious question involved is the actual conviction of the accused of murder in the second degree. This offense is defined by Section 12403, General Code, and it is essential to a conviction thereunder that there be evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused purposely and maliciously killed another. From this record there is not sufficient evidence of either purpose or malice, and the conviction on that charge cannot be sustained. However, as we view it, there was adequate evidence of the unlawful killing, and that the accused was guilty, under Section 12404, General Code, of manslaughter in the first degree.

Accordingly, we act in accordance with subsection 4 of Section' 13449-1, General Code, which reads:

“4. That the verdict is not sustained by sufficient *288evidence, or is contrary to law; but if the evidence shows the defendant to be not guilty of the degree of crime for which he was convicted, but guilty of a lebsev degree thereof, or of a lesser crime included therein, the court may modify the verdict or finding accordingly, without granting or ordering a new trial, and pass sentence on such verdict or finding as modified, and this power shall extend to any court to which the cause may be taken by proceedings in error * *

It is, therefore, the judgment of this court that the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas be modified accordingly, without the granting or ordering of a new trial. It is ordered further that this cause be remanded to the Court of Common Pleas, under the provisions of Section 13459-6, General Code, with instructions to carry this order of modification into effect and impose a sentence such as is authorized by Section 12404, General Code,

*Judgment accordingly.*

McClintock, P. J., and Putnam, J., concur.
Exhibit 32.1
**Written Statement of thePresident and Chief Executive Officer****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350**
     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, theundersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Whitehall Limited, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter endedDecember 31, 2004(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
*/s/ Ronald Mustari*Ronald Mustari
YOU On Demand Holdings, Inc.: Exhibit 10.2 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Supplemental Agreement to Mobile Phone Video-On-Demand (VOD)
Business Cooperation Agreement 

Party A: C Media Limited 

Address: CN11, LEGEND TOWN, 1
Dongli, Balizhuang, Chaoyang District, Beijing 

Party B: Zhonghai Video Media (Beijing) Co., Ltd. 

Address:
Rm 2603, Block A, Yuanyang Guanghua International Center, 10 Jintongxi Road,
Chaoyang District, Beijing 

Party C: Beijing C Media Video Technology Co., Ltd.


Address: CN11, LEGEND TOWN, 1 Dongli, Balizhuang, Chaoyang District, Beijing


Whereas, both Party A and Party B entered into the “Mobile
Phone Video-On-Demand (VOD) Business Cooperation Agreement” (hereinafter
referred to as “Original Agreement”) on the date of March 26, 2015 and
Beijing C Media Video Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Party
C”) is an entity wholly (100%) controlled by Party A. Trough amicable
consultation, the foregoing three parties conclude and sign this supplemental
agreement on the date of April 28, 2015 with respect to the transfer of rights
and obligations under the Original Agreement, on and subject to the following
terms and conditions: 

I. The aforesaid three parties agree that Party A shall
transfer all of its rights and obligations under the Original Agreement in whole
to Party C, who will substitute for Party A, and that Party C shall accept such
transfer and continue the performance of the said rights and obligations under
the Original Agreement. In other words, with respect to the license of mobile
phone video content in the Original Agreement, Party B will grant Party C a
license to use such content within Mainland China, the Payer shall be Party C
instead of Party B, and the invoices shall be directly issued by Party B to
Party C. 

II. Any other agreement or credits and debts between Party C
and Party A or any third party shall be irrelevant to this Supplemental
Agreement. After effectiveness of this Supplemental Agreement, Party C shall not
refuse to perform this Agreement on the grounds of the invalidity, cancellation,
rescission or termination of any other agreement, credits and debts between
Party C and Party A or any third party. 

III. The performance by Party B of contractual obligations
against Party C shall be deemed performance of such obligations against Party A,
and Party A shall not require Party B to perform such obligations again. In case
that Party C fails or is unable to perform any of the obligations transferred
hereunder, Party A agrees to bear the joint and several liability for such
failure or inability. 

1




IV. All remaining provisions of the Original Agreement shall
remain unchanged. 

(THIS PAGE IS EXECUTION PAGE) 

Party A: 

/s/ C Media
Limited                                                                


Date: April 28, 2015 

Party B: Zhonghai Video Media (Beijing) Co., Ltd. 

/s/ Zhonghai Video Media (Beijing) Co.,
Ltd.                    

Date: April 28, 2015 

Party C: Beijing C Media Video Technology Co., Ltd. 

/s/ C Media Video Technology Co.,
Ltd.                             

Date: April 28, 2015 

2
## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. PD-1193-19 DELFINO ORTEGA, JR., Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEX AS

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE ELEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

ERATH COUNTY

Per curiam . Y E A R Y , J., filed a dissenting opinion in w hich S L A U G H T E R , J., joined. O P I N I O N Appellant was convicted of driving while intoxicated and sentenced to twenty y ears in prison. In t he bill of costs, t he trial court a ssessed Appellant a $25 tim e p ay m ent f ee. See T E X . L O C A L G O V ’ T C O D E § 133.103. On appeal, the Court of Appeals struck a portion of that f ee as b eing unconstitutional. Ortega v. State , No. 11-19-00081-CR, 2019 Tex. App. LEXISORTEGA - 2

9199 (Tex. App. – Eastland Oct. 18, 2019). The State has f

iled a petition f

or discretionary review a rguing that the t im e pay m ent f ee was prem aturely assessed. W e recently handed down o ur opinion in Dulin v. State , Nos. PD-0856-19 & PD-0857-19, 2021 Tex. Crim . App. LEXIS 273 (Tex. Crim . App. Mar. 31, 2021), in which we h eld that the tim e p ay m ent f ee was assessed prem aturely because the pendency of appeal suspends the obligation to pay court costs. Accordingly , we grant ground one o f the State’s petition f o r d iscreti o n a r y review, vacate the judgm ent of the Court o f Appeals, and rem a nd this case t o the Court of Appeals f or proceedings consistent with this opinion. The State’s other grounds are ref used. DATE DELIVERED: MAY 12, 2021 DO NOT PUBLISH
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 22, 2020

No. 04-19-00332-CV

Lee B. WHEELER, Trustee of the L&P Children's Trust and Nancy Wheeler Plumlee,

Appellants

v.

SAN MIGUEL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.,

Appellee

From the 36th Judicial District Court, McMullen County, Texas

Trial Court No. M-17-0027-CV-A

Honorable Starr Boldrick Bauer, Judge Presiding

ORDER

This appeal is set for oral argument submission on Tuesday, May 19, 2020, at 9:00 a.m.,

before a panel consisting of Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, and 

Justice Liza A. Rodriguez. In accordance with the Texas Supreme Court’s emergency orders in 

response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the oral argument will be held through the Fourth Court of 

Appeals’ Zoom license. To accommodate oral argument through the Zoom license, the 

scheduled time for this argument is changed to 10:30 a.m. Counsel are instructed not to appear 

at the court’s physical address.

Counsel will receive a separate e-mail that will contain a link for the oral argument. 

Counsel are admonished as follows:

1. The link to Zoom is only for lead counsel of record and is not to be shared with any 

other person. Lead counsel will need a computer or other electronic device with a camera, a 

microphone, and access to the Internet. If lead counsel intends to present any exhibits during 

oral argument, any such exhibits must be electronically filed by noon on the day before 

argument.

2. The argument will be live streamed to the Court’s YouTube channel for the benefit of 

co-counsel, clients, and the public. The argument can be accessed using the following link:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiaWJQ7eW5OQIALdyLN6s3A
3. Lead counsel are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the Zoom platform. The 

clerk of the court will contact lead counsel no later than the week before argument to verify 

connectivity and equipment.

 4. Lead counsel must wear court-appropriate attire and choose an appropriate 

background.

The time for oral argument will be limited to twenty minutes for appellant’s opening 

argument, twenty minutes for appellee’s argument, and ten minutes for appellant’s rebuttal

argument. If any participant’s link is disconnected during argument, timing of the argument will 

stop until the participant is able to reconnect.

If either party no longer wishes to present argument, the party must notify this court in 

writing within seven days of receiving this notice.

Entered on this 22nd day of April, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Attested to: _____________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ALBERT CURRY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0517-CG-B

)

TODD HANKS, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant 

to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is 

ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion 

for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant 

Todd Hanks are DISMISSED with prejudice. 

DONE and ORDERED this 29th day of February, 2016. 

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00517-CG-B Document 35 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.2

                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

   We hereby consent to all references to Ryder Scott Company, L.P. and/or the
reports prepared by Ryder Scott Company, L.P. entitled "Estimated Future
Reserves and Income Attributable to Certain Leasehold and Royalty Interests SEC
Case as of December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001" in the Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001 and to the incorporation by reference into Spinnaker
Exploration Company's previously filed Registration Statement No. 333-72238 on
Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-89779 and 333-36592 and 333-61888
on Form S-8.

                                          RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

March 7, 2002
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as President and Chief Executive Officer of BTU International, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the
Report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Paul J. van der WansemPaul J. van der WansemPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (principal executive officer)


Dated: November 9, 2007
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as President and Chief Executive Officer of BTU International, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to his
knowledge:



| | 1. | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 3, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods
covered by the Report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Paul J. van der WansemPaul J. van der WansemPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (principal executive officer)


Dated: November 4, 2010