alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the annual report of Internet Gold-Golden Lines Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ehud Yahalom, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Ehud Yahalom*


Ehud Yahalom


Principal Financial Officer




April 24, 2013





*           The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.


This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### John De Haas, relator v. Newaygo Circuit Judge.

*Settlement of ease after resignation of tiidl judge.*

Mandamus to settle a case for review will not issue to a judge wlio Las resigned since filing Lis answer to tLe order to sLow cause. Relief sLould Le asked from Lis successor.

Mandamus.

Motion submitted April 6.

Denied April 13.

*Ed. E. Edwards*and *A. G. Day*for relator.

Marston, C. J.

¥e are of opinion that the circuit judge should have settled a case for review in this court, but as he has since the answer was filed resigned, the writ as prayed for cannot be issued. The relator should apply to the present circuit judge for relief, who undoubtedly would grant a new trial, if upon examination he became satisfied that justice would be advanced thereby.

The other Justices concurred.
----

|   | 1. | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended      September 30, 2008, (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934, as amended; |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Paul O. Koether          |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Paul      O. Koether         |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|                         |   |
|                         |   |
| /s/ Bryan P. Healey          |   |
| Bryan      P. Healey         |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer |   |

----
EXHIBIT 23.2

NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the Securities Act), provides that if any part of a registration statement at the time such part becomes effective contains an
untrue statement of a material fact or an omission to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein
not misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such
person knew of such untruth or omission) may sue, among others, every accountant who has consented to be named as having prepared or certified any part
of the registration statement, or as having prepared or certified any report or valuation which is used in connection with the registration statement,
with respect to the statement in such registration statement, report or valuation which purports to have been prepared or certified by the
accountant.




This Form 10-K is incorporated by reference into
Foundrys filings on Form S-8 Nos. 333-96889, 333-48560, 333-41648 and 333-88817 (collectively, the Registration Statements) and, for
purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, is deemed to be a new registration statement for each Registration Statement into which
it is incorporated by reference.




On June 24, 2002, Foundry dismissed Arthur Andersen
LLP as its independent auditor and appointed Ernst & Young LLP to replace Arthur Andersen. Subsequently, Arthur Andersen LLP was convicted of
obstructing justice and agreed to cease practicing before the Securities and Exchange Commission by August 31, 2002 and has, since then, dissolved its
business. As a result, Foundry has been unable to obtain Arthur Andersens written consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration
Statements of its audit report with respect to Foundrys consolidated statement of income and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act permits Foundry to file this Form 10-K without a written consent from Arthur Andersen. As
a result, however, Arthur Andersen will not have any liability under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact
contained in the financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein. Accordingly, you
would be unable to assert a claim against Arthur Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any purchases of securities under the
Registration Statements made on or after the date of this Form 10-K. To the extent provided in Section 11(b)(3)(C) of the Securities Act, however,
other persons who are liable under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act, including the Companys officers and directors, may still rely on Arthur
Andersens original audit reports as being made by an expert for purposes of establishing a due diligence defense under Section 11(b) of the
Securities Act.


---
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Scott L. Vining, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Paragon Financial Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a.) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b.) paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986; 

 

c.) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d.) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a.) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b.) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Dated: May 2, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JEFFREY ARNOLD JAMES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CA 14-00467-CG-C

)

WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC., et

al.,

)

)

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having 

been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated February 2, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of 

this Court.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Doc. 14) is hereby GRANTED and that this 

case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Washington County, Alabama, from 

whence it came. 

DONE and ORDERED this 2nd day of March, 2015. 

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00467-CG-C Document 23 Filed 03/02/15 Page 1 of 1
11289.

#### Tucker *v.*The State.

Decided April 13, 1920.

Indictment for assault with intent to murder; from Hancock superior court — Judge Park. January 2, 1920.

*Wiley & Lewis,*for plaintiff in error.

*Doyle Campbell, solicitor,*contra.

Luke, J.

1. Where a long excerpt from the charge of the court is assigned as error on the ground “ that it was an expression of opinion by the judge presiding, as to what had been proved on the trial of the case,” without stating what the expression was, or pointing out the particular part or parts of the excerpts complained of, and the excerpt as a whole is not subject to the criticism made, the assignment of error is too vague, indefinite, and uncertain to be considered. *Roberts*v. *State,*92 *Ga.*451 (3) (17 S. E. 262).

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
#### Henry B. Ely v. Antoine Hergesell.

*Covenants of warranty*— Assignment *of grantee’s ‘right of action*— Rights *of purchaser on foreclosure.*

The grantee in a deed containing the “usual covenant of warranty” cannot sever his right of action thereon, and assign it to another person while he keeps the premises himself.

A purchaser under a mortgage is entitled to the benefit of such, covenants as run with the land. '

Error to Mason.

Submitted June 16.

Decided June 22.

• Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

Reversed.

*White & McMahon*for plaintiff in error.

*Isaac Gibson*for defendant in error.

Every *chose in action*springing from a contract is assignable in Michigan and the assignee may sue in his own name : Oomp. L. *326§ 5775 ; even a right of action for a tort may be assigned: *Final v. Backus*18 Mich. 218; so can every interest relating to property which is assignable in equity *: Cook, v. Bell*id. 387; covenants do not run with a mortgage: *Ladue v. Det. & Mil. R. R.*13 Mich. 380 ; *Caruthers v. Humphrey*12 Mich, 270; *Hogsett v. Ellis*17 Mich. 351.

Marston, C. J.

Under the pleadings and facts found by the circuit judge in this case we are of opinion the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. The plaintiff claimed to recover as an assignee for breach of covenants of warranty in a deed of conveyance of lands, although he at no time had any right or interest in the premises conveyed. The conveyance to the plaintiff’s assignor contained the *“*usual covenants of warranty,” some of which certainly run with the land, and the grantee therein could not sever her right of action thereunder and assign the same to a third person, she still retaining the premises.

Previous to this assignment the premises had been mortgaged, and the mortgage was still outstanding and might therefore ripen into a title, and should such happen the hqlder thereof would be entitled to the benefit of such covenants as run with the land.

Even if this were insufficient there are still other objections to the plaintiff’s recovery under the facts as found by the circuit judge. In no view of the case was the plaintiff entitled to recover.

The judgment must be reversed and judgment entered in this court for the plaintiff in error with costs of both courts.

The other Justices concurred.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 3(i)(2)

              CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                               TANTIVY GROUP, INC.

STEPHEN D. CUMMINS certifies that:

         1.       The original articles were filed with the Office of the
                  Secretary of State on July 10, 1996.
         2.       As of the date of this certificate, 55,073,000 shares of stock
                  of the corporation has been issued.
         3.       The company hereby adopt the following amendments to the
                  Articles of Incorporation of this Corporation.
         4.       Shareholders holding in excess of 66% of the above shares
                  approved this amendment.

Article I is amended to read as follows:

                                 ARTICLE I. NAME

The name of the corporation is ORETECH, INC.

The corporation also executed effective this day, a 10 for 1 reverse stock split
of its 55,073,000 shares of outstanding stock bringing the number of shares
outstanding after the reverse to 5,507,300 without reversing or affecting the
authorized shares of the company which shall remain at 200,000,000.

Dated: March 31, 2003

                                                /s/ Stephen D. Cummins
                                                --------------------------------
                                                STEPHEN D. CUMMINS, President
                                                Tantivy Group, Inc.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2


                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
       (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                              UNITED STATES CODE)


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Internet
Initiative Japan Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended
March 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 6, 2007


                                 INTERNET INITIATIVE JAPAN INC.

                                       /s/ Akihisa Watai
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                 Name:     Akihisa Watai
                                 Title:    Director, Chief Financial Officer and
                                           Chief Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form 10-QSB of Kent Financial Services, Inc. for the nine months ended September
30,  1999 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such  financial
statements.


</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000316028
<NAME>                                         KENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         5,055
<SECURITIES>                                   7,375
<RECEIVABLES>                                     92
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              12,522
<PP&E>                                         1,705
<DEPRECIATION>                                   518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                14,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,853
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         190
<OTHER-SE>                                    11,754
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  14,115
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,055
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,073
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (218)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (218)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (218)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.11)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule Contains Summary Financial Information Extracted From The
Condensed Financial Statements As Of June 30, 1998 And For The Six Months
Then Ended and Is Qualified In Its Entirety By Reference To Such
Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              44
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     7
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      51
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1584
<BONDS>                                            525
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2059)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        51
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     1
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        1
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
James Anderson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting of Matrix
Energy Services Corporation. (“the Registrant”) do hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge, based upon the review of the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.








Date:
      August 19,  2008
            /s/ James
      Anderson


James
      Anderson


Chief
      Executive Officer


And
      Principal Accounting Officer











* A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.