alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Paul J. van der Wansem, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BTU International, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 16, 2006                                          /s/ Paul J. van der Wansem   Paul J. van der Wansem   President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board ofDirectors (principal executive officer)
Exhibit 13.1


CERTIFICATIONS
  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Internet Initiative Japan Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: July 19, 2011





Internet Initiative Japan Inc./s/ Koichi SuzukiName:
Koichi SuzukiTitle:
President, Chief Executive Officer and

Representative Director
Exhibit 12.2
 Doral Financial Corporation
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
 Quarter EndedMarch
31, 2010Including Interest on DepositsEarnings:Pre-tax loss from continuing operations
    
    $
    (974
    )Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    66,015Total Earnings
    
    $
    65,041Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    65,426Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized
expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    41An estimate of the interest component within rental expense
    
    
    548Total Fixed Charges before preferred dividends
    
    
    66,015Preferred dividends
    
    
    1,864Ratio of pre tax loss to net loss
    
    
    0.278Preferred dividend factor
    
    
    518Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    66,533Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
    
    
    (A)Excluding Interest on Deposits(Loss) Earnings:Pre-tax loss from continuing operations
    
    $
    (974
    )Plus:Fixed Charges (excluding capitalized interest)
    
    
    39,315Total Earnings
    
    $
    38,341Fixed Charges:Interest expensed and capitalized
    
    $
    38,726Amortized premiums, discounts, and capitalized
expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    41An estimate of the interest component within rental expense
    
    
    548Total Fixed Charges before preferred dividends
    
    
    39,315Preferred dividends
    
    
    1,864Ratio of pre tax loss to net loss
    
    
    0.278Preferred dividend factor
    
    
    518Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    39,833Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
    
    
    (A)
 (A)
    
    Due to the Companys pre-tax loss for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 the ratio coverage was less than 1:1.
The Company would have to generate additional earnings of
$1.5 million to achieve a ratio of 1:1 during the first quarter
of 2010.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7850

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MILTON G. DEOLIVEIRA, a/k/a Milton G. DeOlivera, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-147) Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 19, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Milton G. DeOliveira, Appellant Pro Se. Robert William Wiechering, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Milton G. DeOliveira seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denyall pending motions, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. DeOliveira , No. CR-92-147 (E.D. Va. Nov. 5, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 10.2

 

STATE NATIONAL COMPANIES, INC.
 2015 CASH INCENTIVE PLAN

 

AWARD AGREEMENT

 

	
Name   of Recipient:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Maximum   Amount:
    	
$               
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Performance   Period:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Qualified   Performance-
   Based Award:
    	
o Yes

o No
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date   of Grant:
    	
 
    


 

The Committee hereby grants to the individual named above (the “Recipient”) a performance-based cash bonus in the Maximum Amount specified above, provided all of the Performance Goals set forth in Exhibit A hereto are achieved for the Performance Period specified above.  For each Performance Goal achieved, the Company will pay the Recipient the amount set forth on Exhibit A hereto corresponding to the respective measure.  If Exhibit A includes Threshold, Target and Outstanding levels of performance, the Maximum Amount will be paid only if all of the levels of performance are at Outstanding or higher.

 

Neither the Plan nor this Award Agreement creates any right on the part of the Recipient to continue in the service of the Company or any Affiliates thereof.

 

The Recipient hereby acknowledges that all decisions, determinations and interpretations of the Board of Directors or the Committee in respect of the Plan and this Award Agreement shall be final and conclusive.

 

This Award is subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference.  In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of the Plan and the terms and conditions of this Award Agreement, the terms and conditions of the Plan shall prevail.  Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms herein shall have the same meaning as those contained in the Plan.

 

The Plan and this Award Agreement constitute the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede in their entirety all prior undertakings and agreements of the Company and the Recipient with respect to the subject matter hereof, and may not be modified adversely to the Recipient’s interest except by means of a writing signed by the Company and the Recipient.

 

This Award Agreement is governed by the internal substantive laws, but not the choice of law rules, of Delaware.

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, State National Companies, Inc. has caused this Award Agreement to be executed, and said Recipient has hereunto set his or her hand, as of this          day of                         20    .

 

	
 
    	
STATE   NATIONAL COMPANIES, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
RECIPIENT
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    


 

2











 

EXHIBIT A

 

PERFORMANCE GOALS
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

)

)

)

)

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CRIMINAL NO. 13-00127-CG

KENNETH PATRICK MCGEE

ORDER

On February 20, 2014, following a bench trial on stipulated facts, the 

court found the defendant not guilty only by reason of insanity of violations of 

Title 18, United States Code, § 844(i), Attempted Arson, and § 844(e), 

Maliciously Conveying False Information. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4243(b), 

the court ordered that the defendant be examined for a determination of 

whether or not the defendant is suffering from a mental disease or defect as a 

result of which his release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to 

another person or serious damage to the property of another (Doc. 37). 

Following the hearing conducted pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §4243(c), the 

court determined that McGee could be conditionally released pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 4243(f)(2) (Doc. 40). Since he has been on conditional release, 

several petitions have been filed with the court by the U.S. Probation Office 

detailing the difficulties McGee has exhibited in abiding by the conditions 

imposed (Docs. 41, 42 & 46, all *SEALED*). On February 5, 2015, the U.S. 

Probation Office filed a petition to revoke McGee’s conditional release based 

Case 1:13-cr-00127-CG-N Document 49 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 2
2

on continued noncompliance with the conditions of release and treatment.

(Doc. 47 *SEALED*).

Today a hearing was held on the petition. The defendant was 

represented by his attorney, Assistant Federal Defender Latisha Colvin, and 

the United States was represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney George May.

The court determined that the defendant did not contest any of the 

allegations in the petition and that he agreed to waive a hearing thereon. 

The court therefore found that the factual allegations in the petition were 

admitted, and that the defendant’s conditional release should therefore be 

revoked for non-compliance with the conditions of release and treatment.

Accordingly, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4243(g) it is ORDERED that the 

defendant’s conditional release is hereby REVOKED, and he is committed to 

the custody of the Attorney General, who shall comply with the provisions of 

18 U.S.C. §§4243(e) and (f).

DONE and ORDERED this 13th day of February, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cr-00127-CG-N Document 49 Filed 02/13/15 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1760 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1760

  To extend the admission to Guam or the Commonwealth of the Northern 
         Mariana Islands for certain nonimmigrant H-2B workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2023

  Mr. Moylan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on the 
 Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the admission to Guam or the Commonwealth of the Northern 
         Mariana Islands for certain nonimmigrant H-2B workers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ADMISSION TO GUAM OR THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE 
              NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS FOR CERTAIN NONIMMIGRANT H-2B 
              WORKERS.

    Section 6(b)(1)(B) of the Joint Resolution entitled ``A Joint 
Resolution to approve the `Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth of the 
Northern Mariana Islands in Political Union with the United States of 
America', and for other purposes'', approved March 24, 1976 (48 U.S.C. 
11 1806(b)(1)(B)), is amended, in the matter preceding clause (i), by 
striking ``December 31, 2024'' and inserting ``December 31, 2029''.
                                 <all>
```
Project 5 Wrap UP
Aircraft Impact and Initial Damage

Projec

Fire Growth and Esti

Gas Temperature Distr

Project 5

Probable Collapse Seq

Project 6
Some Important Accomplishme

• Detailed spatial and temporal mapping of extern

pathways derived from WTC imagery used as in

• Use of real-scale fire modeling to calibrate FDS• Extension of FDS to multiblock and parallel pro• Approach for calculating surface heat transfer to 

gas temperatures from large-cell FDS calculatiomuch finer resolved meshes used for the ANSYcalculations

• Approaches for coupling the finely resolved sol

temperatures derived from ANSYS calculationsnode structures employed in structural models
Major Project Outputs

• Temporal and spatial maps for windows 

smoke, and fire based on visual evidenc

• Experimental burning behaviors of typic

present in the WTC towers

• Calculated temporal and spatial variatio

temperature fields in the towers

• Temporally and spatially resolved tem

structural elements (steel and concretowers
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of HealthExtras, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                     
|----------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|February 28, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ DAVID T. BLAIR                  
|                  |  |  |  | David T. Blair                      
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director



| |  |  |  |                                                     
| |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | /s/ RICHARD W. HUNT                                 
| |  |  |  | Richard W. Hunt                                     
| |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN
THE   COMPANY'S   FORM  10-K  FOR  THE YEAR ENDED 1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                          JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                     30,685
<SECURITIES>                                               64,849
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                8,001
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          340,484
<PP&E>                                                     16,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                             12,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            431,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     391,600
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                   26,015
<OTHER-SE>                                                 14,251 <F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              431,866
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           21,918
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           11,578
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          5,825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             4,015
<INCOME-TAX>                                                1,503
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               276
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                                2,236
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 .66 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 .64 <F3>
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES UNREALIZED GAIN ON SECURITIES AFS OF (312)
<F2>AFTER EXTRAORDINARY ITEM OF 276, BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY
ITEM PRIMARY .74.
<F3> AFTER EXTRAORDINARY ITEM OF 276, BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY
ITEM DILUTED .72.
</FN>


</TABLE>
OSAC Affiliates 

October 2023 

   

AFFILIATES 

Lara Adams 

Jilian Adkins 

 

Julia Allwood 

Barry Baker 

 

Matthew Birck 

Jason Byrd 

Peter Claussen 

James Creecy 

 

David Foran 

Kimberly Frazier 

 

Jenny Giles 

Brian Hamlin 

Arati Iyengar 

 

Rachel Jacobs 

Laura Johnson 

Trey Knott 

Kathy Moore 

Benjamin Neely 

Teagen Partin 

 

Kristine Pilgrim 

Lauren Schumacher 

Jolene Strand 

Jessica Terrill 

 

Silvana Tridico 

Misa Winters 

Darren Wostenberg
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1539 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1539

 To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to require 
schools to provide fluid milk substitutes upon request of a student or 
    the parent or guardian of such student, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2023

   Mr. Carter of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to require 
schools to provide fluid milk substitutes upon request of a student or 
    the parent or guardian of such student, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLUID MILK SUBSTITUTES.

    Section 9(a)(2)(B) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(a)(2)(B)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i)--
                    (A) by striking ``may'' and inserting ``shall'';
                    (B) by striking ``and meets'' and inserting ``as 
                determined by the most recent Dietary Guidelines for 
                Americans published under section 301 of the National 
                Nutrition Monitoring and Related Research Act of 1990 
                (7 U.S.C. 5341) or that meets''; and
                    (C) by striking ``for students who cannot consume 
                fluid milk because of a medical or other special 
                dietary need other than a disability described in 
                subparagraph (A)(iii)'';
            (2) in clause (ii)--
                    (A) by striking ``may'' and inserting ``shall'';
                    (B) by striking ``the school notifies the State 
                agency'' and all that follows through ``if the 
                substitution is'';
                    (C) by striking ``by written statement of a medical 
                authority or'';
                    (D) by inserting ``student or a'' after ``by a''; 
                and
                    (E) by striking ``that identifies the medical or 
                other special dietary need that restricts the student's 
                diet''; and
            (3) by striking clause (iii).
                                 <all>
```