Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2014 / Notices 76387 

The negative determination was based 

on the Department’s findings that the 

subject firm does not produce an article 

within the meaning of Section 222(a) or 

Section 222(b) of the Act. In order to be 

considered eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Section 223 

of the Trade Act of 1974, the worker 

group seeking certification (or on whose 

behalf certification is being sought) 

must work for a ‘‘firm’’ or appropriate 

subdivision that produces an article. 

The definition of a firm includes an 

individual proprietorship, partnership, 

joint venture, association, corporation 

(including a development corporation), 

business trust, cooperative, trustee in 

bankruptcy, and receiver under decree 

of any court. 

During the investigation, the 

Department obtained information that 

revealed that the subject firm did not 

produce an article; rather, the subject 

firm supplied services related to call 

center services. 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

workers assert that their jobs were 

outsourced to foreign countries but did 

not provide information pertaining to 

the subject firm producing an article. 29 

CFR 90. 

The petitioners did not supply facts 

not previously considered; nor provide 

additional documentation indicating 

that there was either (1) a mistake in the 

determination of facts not previously 

considered or (2) a misinterpretation of 

facts or of the law justifying 

reconsideration of the initial 

determination. Based on these findings, 

the Department determines that 29 CFR 

90.18(c) has not been met. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the application 

and investigative findings, I conclude 

that there has been no error or 

misinterpretation of the law or of the 

facts which would justify 

reconsideration of the Department of 

Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the 

application is denied. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 9th day of 

December, 2014 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29828 Filed 12–19–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–85,013] 

TRW Integrated Chassis Systems, LLC, 

North American Braking Division, a 

Subsidiary of TRW Automotive, 

Including On-Site Leased Workers 

From Adecco and DM Burr, Saginaw, 

Michigan; Notice of Negative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration 

By application dated October 15, 

2014, the United Automobile Workers 

(UAW), Local Union 467, requested 

administrative reconsideration of the 

Department of Labor’s negative 

determination regarding eligibility to 

apply for worker adjustment assistance, 

applicable to workers and former 

workers of TRW Integrated Chassis 

Systems, LLC, North American Braking 

Division, a subsidiary of TRW 

Automotive, Saginaw, Michigan (subject 

firm). The subject firm is engaged in 

activities related to the production of 

rotor and knuckle components and 

brake corners. The subject worker group 

includes on-site leased workers from 

Adecco and DM Burr. 

The denial notice was signed on 

February 26, 2014, and the Notice of 

Determination was published in the 

Federal Register on October 29, 2014 

(79 FR 64415). 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) 

reconsideration may be granted under 

the following circumstances: 

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts 

not previously considered that the 

determination complained of was 

erroneous; 

(2) If it appears that the determination 

complained of was based on a mistake 

in the determination of facts not 

previously considered; or 

(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying 

Officer, a mis- interpretation of facts or 

of the law justified reconsideration of 

the decision. 

The negative determination was based 

on the Department’s findings that the 

subject firm did not shift the production 

of articles like or directly competitive 

with rotor and knuckle components and 

brake corners to a foreign country; that 

imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with the rotor and knuckle 

components and brake corners did not 

contribute importantly to the workers’ 

separation or threat of separation and to 

the decline in sales or production of the 

firm; and that the subject firm is not a 

Supplier or Downstream Producer to a 

firm that employed a group of workers 

who received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 

U.S.C. 2272(a). 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

UAW asserts that the workers of the 

subject firm should be eligible for TAA 

because industry imports into the 

United States increased in the first 

quarter of 2014. The UAW, however, 

did not provide new information 

pertaining to 2012 and 2013, which are 

the time periods under investigation. 29 

CFR 90 

The petitioner did not supply facts 

not previously considered; nor provide 

additional documentation indicating 

that there was either (1) a mistake in the 

determination of facts not previously 

considered or (2) a misinterpretation of 

facts or of the law justifying 

reconsideration of the initial 

determination. Based on these findings, 

the Department determines that 29 CFR 

90.18(c) has not been met. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the application 

and investigative findings, I conclude 

that there has been no error or 

misinterpretation of the law or of the 

facts which would justify 

reconsideration of the Department of 

Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the 

application is denied. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 9th day of 

December, 2014. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29824 Filed 12–19–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration 

[Docket Nos. OSHA–2014–0020, 0017, 0010, 

0008, 0006, 0003, 0002, OSHA–2013–0014, 

0001, OSHA–2012–0056, 0053, 0052, 0051, 

0050, 0049, 0048, 0047, 0046, 0045, 0044, 

0043, 0042, 0041, OSHA–2011–0093] 

Authorization To Open Dockets of 

Denied Variance Applications for 

Public Access 

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA), Labor. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In this notice, OSHA 

announces its intent to update the 

publication of the dockets of variance 

applications that it denied in the past. 

Because OSHA denied these 

applications, it did not publish them in 

the Federal Register for public review. 

OSHA is making this information 

available to the public to enhance 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES