alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM     We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-51508, 33-64313,333-51512, 333-27563, 333-63756, 333-81441, 333-63754, 333-110098, 333-51506, 333-115849,333-121755, 333-121754 and 333-124863 on Form S-8 and 333-126559 on Form S-3 of Nash-Finch Companyof our report dated March 11, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andrelated financial statement schedule of Nash-Finch Company and subsidiaries, Nash-Finch Companymanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Nash-Finch Company and subsidiaries,included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nash-Finch Company for the fiscal year ended December31, 2005.     /s/ Ernst & Young LLPMinneapolis, Minnesota
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1546 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1546

To prohibit the use of funds to implement any obligations of the United 
  States under the World Health Organization's Global Pandemic Treaty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2023

  Mr. Jackson of Texas (for himself, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. 
Sessions, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Norman, Mr. Waltz, Mr. Wittman, Mr. Cloud, Mr. 
   Steube, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mrs. Harshbarger, Mrs. Luna, Mr. 
Duncan, and Mr. Bost) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of funds to implement any obligations of the United 
  States under the World Health Organization's Global Pandemic Treaty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting American Sovereignty 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS.

    (a) In General.--No funds available to any Federal department or 
agency may be used to implement any obligations of the United States 
under the World Health Organization's Global Pandemic Treaty.
    (b) Definition.--In this section, the term ``World Health 
Organization's Global Pandemic Treaty'' means the Zero draft report by 
the Working Group on Strengthening WHO Preparedness and Response to 
Health Emergencies, and any related or successor reports and 
recommendations regarding pandemics as created by the World Health 
Organization.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ELBERT SMITH, JR., and )

THERESA SMITH )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil Case No.: 05-331-BH-B

)

SCALES EXPRESS, INC., et al )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Scales Express, Inc.’s (hereinafter, “Scales”)

Motion (Doc. 34) to Stay. The parties have briefed this issue and appeared before the Court on

February 23, 2006 for a hearing on this motion. Based on the arguments and pleadings of the

parties, the Court finds that Defendant Scales’s Motion to Stay is due to be and hereby DENIED.

Though Defendant Scales is insured by Lincoln General Insurance Company (hereinafter, “Lincoln

General”), they are not a party to Lincoln General’s interpleader action, nor is Lincoln General a

named defendant in the instant action. At this point, Plaintiffs have not made a claim on, nor sought

to satisfy a judgment with, the funds deposited by Lincoln General as part of its interpleader action.

Therefore, the Court does not find that staying this matter in light of the interpleader action would

be appropriate at this time. 

So ORDERED, this 1st day of March, 2006.

s/ W. B. Hand

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00331-BH-B Document 55 Filed 03/01/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1











                                   EXHIBIT 23
<PAGE>   2

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective
Amendment No. 11 to Registration Statement No. 33-15017, Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-29111, Post-Effective
Amendment No. 5 to Registration Statement No. 33-79014, Post-Effective Amendment
No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 333-32455, and Post-Effective Amendment No.
2 to Registration Statement No. 333-33439 on Forms S-8 of our report dated May
7, 1998, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Fresh Foods, Inc. for
the fiscal year ended February 27, 1998.





DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina
May 27, 1998
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ERIC BLANDING, :

 :

Plaintiff, :

 :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0738-CG-B 

 :

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., :

 :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the

issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this

Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for

plaintiff’s failure prosecute and to obey the Court’s orders.

DONE and ORDERED this 16th day of March, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00738-CG-B Document 6 Filed 03/16/10 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (SEC File Numbers 333-10331 and 333-58587) of Mobile
America Corporation of our report dated March 17, 1999, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Mobile America Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, and all
related schedules, which report appears in the annual report on Form 10-K of
Mobile America Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1998.



Cherry, Bekaert & Holland L.L.P.
Certified Public Accountants
Orlando, Florida
July 9, 1999
December 31, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

D. PATRICK SMITHERMAN, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00148-CV V.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard the parties’ joint motion to reverse the judgment 

signed by the court below on November 19, 2014. Having considered the motion 

and found it meritorious, we order the judgment REVERSED AND REMAND 

the cause to the trial court for proceedings in accordance with the parties’ 

agreement. 

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1548 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1548

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to specify that actions of 
the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation are not a collection 
           of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2023

Mrs. Kim of California (for herself and Mr. Gottheimer) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
      Services, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and 
   Accountability, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to specify that actions of 
the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation are not a collection 
           of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Access to Small Business 
Information Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT.

    Section 4(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 
78d(j)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(10) Exclusion from the paperwork reduction act.--Actions 
        taken by the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation 
        under this subsection shall not be a `collection of 
        information' for purposes of subchapter I of chapter 35 of 
        title 44, United States Code (commonly referred to as the 
        `Paperwork Reduction Act').''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 ) 

vs. ) CRIMINAL NO. 10-00179-002-CG 

 ) 

LUZ MARIA BURTON, ) 

 ) 

Defendant. ) 

ORDER

 This matter is before the court on the United States’ appeal from the oral order of the 

Magistrate Judge releasing the defendant on conditions. The undersigned has read the pretrial 

services report and listened to the recording of the detention hearing held on August 19, 2010. 

Having reviewed the evidence, the court finds that there are no conditions of release that will 

reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety of any other person 

and the community. 

 The defendant is a native of Colombia, who has lived in this country for approximately 

20 years. Her mother and siblings all still live in Colombia, with the exception of one brother 

who is serving a federal sentence in South Carolina. She maintains close ties to all of her 

siblings, travels to Colombia to visit her relatives, and recently returned from such a trip. She 

has four daughters who live in the Houston area. The defendant does intermittent contract work 

at refineries, which pays approximately $1500 per week. She has not worked since March 

2010, and currently has no money in the bank. Her rent and other living expenses exceed $1250 

a month. 

 The defendant is charged in counts which carry minimum mandatory sentences of 10 

Case 1:10-cr-00179-CG-N Document 22 Filed 08/20/10 Page 1 of 2
years in Count One, and Five Years in Count Two. The weight of the evidence against her 

appears strong. 

 From this evidence, the court finds that the defendant has both a motive to flee and close 

relatives in Colombia with whom she could seek refuge. She has no money in savings, and 

although her adult children live in the Houston area, the court finds that the prospect of a lengthy 

sentence makes it less likely that she would stay in the Houston area for her children’s sake. 

Accordingly, the court finds that there are no conditions of release that will reasonably assure the 

defendant’s appearance. 

 Accordingly, the court ORDERS that the defendant be detained pending trial. 

DONE and ORDERED this 20th day of August, 2010. 

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:10-cr-00179-CG-N Document 22 Filed 08/20/10 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SIDNEY CLARK, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION 16-0330-CG-C

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CRIMINAL NO. 10-00056-CG

)

Respondent. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been 

no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B) and dated October 11, 2016, is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED this 4th day of November, 2016.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cr-00056-CG-C Document 154 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1596 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1596

     To amend the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer 
 Protection Act to repeal the exemption from enhanced supervision and 
 prudential standards applicable to bank holding companies with total 
   consolidated assets between $50,000,000,000 and $250,000,000,000.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2023

 Mr. Moulton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer 
 Protection Act to repeal the exemption from enhanced supervision and 
 prudential standards applicable to bank holding companies with total 
   consolidated assets between $50,000,000,000 and $250,000,000,000.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stabilizing Vulnerable Banks Act''.

SEC. 2. ENHANCED SUPERVISION AND PRUDENTIAL STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN BANK 
              HOLDING COMPANIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 401 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory 
Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (Public Law 115-174) is hereby 
repealed and the provisions of law amended by such section are revived 
or restored as if such section had not been enacted.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents for the Economic 
Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act is amended by 
striking the item relating to section 401.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.31
  
      Definitions
 1




---



##### 



Agreement
 Board
 Cause
 Change in Control
      2




---



##### 



Code
 Company
 Confidential Information
 Date of Termination
 Disability
 Exchange Act
 Good Reason
  3




---



##### 



Highest Monthly Compensation
 Notice of Termination
 Parent Corporation
 Person
 4




---



##### 



Plan
 Retirement
 Subsidiary
 Successor
 Term of Agreement
 Benefits upon a Change in Control Termination
 Cash Paymen
 Welfare Plans )
 5




---



##### 



Tax Reimbursement
    6




---



##### 



provided however
  7




---



##### 



Non-Competition Obligations
 Indemnification
 Confidentiality
 Successors
 Fees and Expenses
 8




---



##### 



Binding Agreement
 No Mitigation
 No Setoff
 Taxes
 Notices
 Disputes
 Jurisdiction
 Related Agreements
 No Employment or Service Contract
 9




---



##### 



Survival
 Miscellaneous
     By:William R. VossChair, Nash Finch Board of DirectorsAgreed to this 28th day of February 2011.Alec C. Covington
 10
#### W. B. Brown *v.*James Henry, etc.

Judgment — Erroneous.

A final judgment cannot be treated as a clerical misprision simply because it is erroneous.

Judgment — Setting Aside Judgment at Subsequent Term.

The action of the court dn setting aside a judgment at a subsequent term is void, and all proceedings taken in the case thereafter are invalid.

*163APPEAL PROM HOPKINS CIRCUIT COURT.

October 8, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

On the 30th of November, 1866, the demurrer to appellant’s original petition was sustained and his temporary injunction dissolved.

On the 7th of December, thereafter, an amended petition was filed and a second injunction granted.

On the 6th of June, 1867, appellees answered. December 5, 1867, appellant filed another amended petition, making the railroad company a party defendant.

The relief sought, as the pleadings then stood, was to enjoin and restrain appellees from making the sale authorized by decree in their suit against the railroad company, and to have a rescission of the contract by which appellant sold and conveyed the twenty-five acres of land to said company.

On the 6th of June, 1868, the cause came on to be heard as to these appellees and was without objection submitted to the court for judgment upon their branch of the controversy. Whereupon it was ordered and adjudged that the injunction hereinbefore granted be and the same is hereby made perpetual and that the plaintiff recover his costs herein expended, and this cause is continued as to the defendant, the Henderson and Nashville Railroad Company.

Whether it was proper to try the question as to the injunction until the cause was prepared for hearing, as against the railroad company, we need not decide. If the action of the court was irregular, it could have been corrected on appeal; certainly its judgment was not void.

The only relief asked by appellant against appellees was that they should be enjoined from making their decretal sale. This relief was granted by the judgment cited, and the cause pending between these parties was fully and finally determined.

So far as they were concerned nothing further remained to be done. It may be that appellant could not proceed with his action against the railroad company without having appellees, parties, but if this be true it only proves that the court erred in hearing one *164branch of the'cause at a time, and not that its action was interlocutory or void.

*W. P. D. Bush, Vance, for appellant.*

*John Rodman, R. T. Petrie, for appellees.*

The error, if one was committed, was in the final disposition of the action as to these appellees and it was one which the circuit court could not correct at a subsequent term.

This final judgment cannot be treated as clerical misprision. If it could, every erroneous judgment might be so treated.

It results therefore that the action of the circuit court in setting aside the judgment at a subsequent term was void, and hence that all proceedings had in the case, after that time, were unauthorized and invalid.

Wherefore, the judgment of April 21, 1870, is reversed, and the cause remanded.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1401 

To require the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 

regularly review and update policies and manuals related to inspections 

at ports of entry. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2023 

Mr. GUEST (for himself, Mr. TRONE, Mr. EZELL, Ms. CRAIG, Mrs. CHAVEZDEREMER, Mrs. LEE of Nevada, Mr. TONY GONZALES of Texas, and Ms. 

TITUS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection to regularly review and update policies and 

manuals related to inspections at ports of entry. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eradicating Narcotic 

5 Drugs and Formulating Effective New Tools to Address 

6 National Yearly Losses of life Act’’ or the ‘‘END 

7 FENTANYL Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1401 IH

1 SEC. 2. ENSURING TIMELY UPDATES TO U.S. CUSTOMS AND 

2 BORDER PROTECTION FIELD MANUALS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not less frequently than tri4 ennially, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border 

5 Protection shall review and update, as necessary, the cur6 rent policies and manuals of the Office of Field Operations 

7 related to inspections at ports of entry to ensure the uni8 form implementation of inspection practices that will ef9 fectively respond to technological and methodological 

10 changes designed to disguise illegal activity, such as the 

11 smuggling of drugs and humans, along the border. 

12 (b) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Shortly after each 

13 update required under subsection (a), the Commissioner 

14 of U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall submit a re15 port to the Committee on Homeland Security and Govern16 mental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Home17 land Security of the House of Representatives that sum18 marizes the policy and manual changes implemented by 

19 such update. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1467 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1467

  To adjust the amount of monthly old-age, survivors, and disability 
 insurance payments under title II of the Social Security Act based on 
              locality-based comparability payment rates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2023

   Ms. Meng introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To adjust the amount of monthly old-age, survivors, and disability 
 insurance payments under title II of the Social Security Act based on 
              locality-based comparability payment rates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Locality-based Social Security 
Benefits Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFIT AMOUNTS ADJUSTED TO REFLECT LOCALITY-
              BASED COMPARABILITY PAYMENT RATES.

    Notwithstanding title II of the Social Security Act, the 
Commissioner of Social Security shall increase the monthly benefit 
amount to which each individual is otherwise entitled under such title 
by the percentage determined by the President under sections 5304 and 
5304a of title 5, United States Code, for the locality pay area (as 
established in section 531.603 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations) 
in which the individual resides at the time of such increase.
                                 <all>
```