alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.9**

 

**NASH-FINCH COMPANY****1995 DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN****(As Amended February 22, 2000 and February 19,2002****)**

 

**First Declaration of Amendment**

 

Pursuant to the retained power of amendment andtermination contained in Section 9 of the instrument entitled “Nash FinchCompany 1995 Director Stock Option Plan (As Amended February 22, 2000 and February 19,2002)” (the “Plan”), the undersigned hereby terminatessuch Plan effective December 27, 2004. Such termination shall have the effects described in Sections 9 and 10of the Plan.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, theundersigned has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorizedofficers this 27th day of December, 2004.

 
| ** ** | **NASH FINCH COMPANY**                |
|------------|---------------------------------------|
| ** ** | ** **                            |
| ** ** | ** **                            |
| Attest:    |   /s/ John  A. Haveman | ** ** | By: | /s/ Kathleen  E.McDermott |
| ** ** | Assistant Secretary                   | ** ** | Senior Vice President |
|            |                                       |  |  |  |  |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1999 UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VINEYARD NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,966,782
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         891,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,905,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 10,630,316
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     84,306,886
<ALLOWANCE>                                    711,977
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             117,272,009
<DEPOSITS>                                 106,750,822
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,557,060
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,106,258
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,857,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             117,272,009
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,209,756
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              217,119
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               183,408
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,610,283
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,160,688
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,160,688
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,449,595
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   41,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,681,050
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                467,040
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   278,040
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     7.0
<LOANS-NON>                                    121,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,775,285
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               694,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  190,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    34,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              662,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           662,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**Pursuant      to**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As      Adopted pursuant to**

**Section      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| Date:                June 28, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Zeynep Hakimoglu                                                              |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |   | Zeynep                Hakimoglu                                                                  |
|                               |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal                Executive Officer) |

**A      signed original of the written statement above required by Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to ClearOne Communications, Inc.      and will be retained by ClearOne Communications, Inc. and furnished to the      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon      request.**
National Institute of Standards and T

Technology Administratio

U.S. Department of Comme

Project 5: Reconstruction of the T

Environment

William M. Pitts

Richard G. Gann

September 14, 2005
Project 5 Purpose

Reconstruct the time-evolving temperature, thermasmoke movement in WTC 1, 2, and 7 for use in evastructural performance of the buildings and behaviooccupants and responders.Today’s discussion is limited to WTC 1 and WTC 2
NIST WTC NIST WTC Investiga

stiga

Analysis

of Steel Structural

Collapse

Baseline 

Performance

& Impact 

Damage

Analysis ofCodes and 

Practices

Fire Service

Response

Active Fire 

Suppression

Thermal and 

Tenability

Environment

Public InputsDocumentsVideo/ PhotographicRecordsOral History DataEmergency Response RecordsRecovered StructuralSteelBPATRecommendationsGovernment, Industry,Professional, Academic InputsPublic Inputs

Project 5

P

Project 2
Principal Project 5 Output

Provide maps of steel and concrete temperaturof time for the affected floors in WTC 1 and WTProject 6 (Structural Fire Response and ProbabSequence)Numerical Modeling was used to provide es

• Initial damage (e.g., structural steel, fl

proofing; primarily provided by Project

• Fire locations and gas temperatures (• Heat transfer to and resulting heating 

and concrete (Project 5)

• Structural Fire Response and Most Pr

Sequence (Project 6)
Aircraft Impact and Initial Damage

Projec

Fire Growth and Esti

Gas Temperature Distr

Project 5

Probable Collapse Seq

Project 6
Project 5

H

Fire Growth and Estimated

Gas Temperature Distributions

(McGrattan)

Visual Analysis

(Pitts)

Fire Tests 

(Hamins)
Project 5 Tasks

• Task 1: Visual Evidence, Damage Estimates, and T

(Pitts, Butler, Junker)

• Task 2: Experiments and Modeling of Structural Ste

to Fire (Hamins, Maranghides, McGrattan,J

Ohlemiller,Donnelly, Yang, Mulholland, PraMcAllister)

• Task 3: Fire Tests of Single Office Workstations (O

Maranghides, Filliben, Gann) (Reported by 

• Task 4: Reaction of Ceiling Tile Systems to Shocks 

Whittaker, Reinhorn, Hough)

• Task 5: Experiments and Modeling of Multiple Work

Compartment (Hamins, Maranghides, McG

Anleitner) 

• Task 6: Computer Simulation of the Fires in the Wo

Towers (McGrattan, Bouldin, Forney)

• Task 7: Fire Structure Interface and Thermal Respo

Trade Center Towers (Prasad, Baum)
TO BE EMPHASIZED 

PRESENTATIONS

• Integration of various mod

approaches

•Enhancements and extensi

existing numerical models

•Temporal and spatial varia

•Task results
#### Keith D. GILBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Drucilla Alexis HARDEE; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-35687.

D.C. No. MS-00-00125-BJR.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*600Submitted May 14, 2001.*

Decided June 1, 2001.

Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Keith D. Gilbert appeals pro se the district court’s order refusing to file his complaint pursuant to a vexatious litigant order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion an application of a vexatious litigant order. *Cf. Moy v. United States,*906 F.2d 467, 469 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm.

In a prior appeal, this court affirmed the district court’s imposition of a vexatious litigant order barring Gilbert from filing actions against the City of Seattle or any of its agents or employees without first obtaining permission of the district court. Because Gilbert’s contentions on appeal indicate that his complaint involved - the same allegations and the same parties for which the vexatious litigant order was issued, the district court properly denied his request to file a new civil case. *See West v. Procunier,*452 F.2d 645, 646 (9th Cir.1971).

Gilbert’s contention of judicial bias is without merit because it is based solely on his disagreement with the district court judge’s decision. *See Liteky v. United States,*510 U.S. 540, 554-55, 114 S.Ct. 1147, 127 L.Ed.2d 474 (1994).

We deny Gilbert’s motion filed October 19, 2000.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
IN	THE	UNITED	STATES	DISTRICT	COURT	FOR	THE

SOUTHERN	DISTRICT	OF	ALABAMA

SOUTHERN	DIVISION

UNITED	STATES	OF	AMERICA )

v. ) CRIMINAL	NOS.	 11-00152-CB

					12-00101-CB

LUIS	DANIEL	COLON, )

Defendant. )

ORDER

This	matter	is	before	the	Court	on	defendant’s	motion	for	reduction	of	

sentence	pursuant	to	18	U.S.C.	§	3582(c)(2)	based	on	a	retroactive	amendment	to	

the	United	States	Sentencing	Guidelines.		In	2014,	the	United	States	Sentencing	

Commission	(“the	Commission”)	enacted	an	amendment	to	the	United	States	

Sentencing	Guidelines	that	further	reduced	the	sentencing	ranges	for	certain	

offenses.		See Amendment	782,	United	States	Sentencing	Guidelines.		The	

Commission	has	deemed	this	to	be	an	amendment	that	may	be	applied	retroactively.		

See U.S.S.G.	§	1B1.10.		After	review	of	the	motion	and	all	relevant	factors	prescribed	

by	§	1B1.10,	the	court	has	determined	that	a	reduction	of	sentence	based	on	the	

amended	guideline	range	may	be	appropriate	in	this	case.		

Defendant	pled	guilty	in	the	above-styled	cases	and	was	sentenced	to	

concurrent	sentence	of	188	months.		His	original	calculated	guidelines range	was

188 to	235	months.	According	to	the	revised	guidelines	calculation	prepared	by	the	

United	States	Probation	Office,	application	of	Amendment	782	would	result	in	a	

guideline	range	of	151 to	188 months. Unless	the	United	States	files	a	written	

Case 1:12-cr-00101-CB Document 42 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 2
objection	on	or	before July	22,	2016,	the	Court	will	enter	an	order	reducing the	

defendant’s	sentence	to	151 months.

DONE this	the	22nd day	of	June,	2016

s/Charles	R.	Butler,	Jr.

Senior	United	States	District	Judge

Case 1:12-cr-00101-CB Document 42 Filed 06/22/16 Page 2 of 2
SCO – St

NSTC Subcommittee 

Standards: Progress R

Mary Saunders

Director

Standards Coordination O
SCO – St

Subcommittee Histo
SCO – St

Subcommittee Compo
SCO – St

Subcommittee Miss
SCO – St

Request for Informa

...and other technology 
SCO – St

Responses to RFI
SCO – St

Observations Regard
SCO – St

General Themes
SCO – St

Opportunities for Impro
SCO – St

Opportunities for N
SCO – St

Consultation/Engagement 
SCO – St

Subcommittee Deliver

images: NIST;integerwireless.com/wilber; graham‐taylor; zimmytwsk; stuyagin/shutterstock;techibuzz.com/GMAutos
SCO – St

Next Steps
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6964

MANUEL A. MARIN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. RANDALL WILLIAMS, Warden of Lieber Correctional Institute; LIEUTENANT GRANT, Lieutenant at Lieber Correctional Institute; MAJOR CLARK, Major of Lieber Correctional Institute; RHU UNIT MANAGER/ CAPTAIN; MS. BIRCH , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Donald C. Co ggins, Jr. , District Judge. ( 2:19

- cv
- 01270

- DCC )

Submitted : October 20, 2020 Decided: October 23, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ , Circuit Judge , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Manuel A. Marin, Appellant Pro Se. Gordon Wade Cooper, BUYCK, SANDERS & SIMMONS, LLC, Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Manuel A. Marin seeks to appeal the magistra te judge’s order denying his “Motion
to Amend to Conform to the Evidence

. ” This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Be neficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order Marin seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral arg ument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 10.17     Each non-employee member of Golden Telecom’s Board of Directors is entitled to receive anannual retainer fee of $15,000. In addition, each non-employee member of the Board of Directors isentitled to receive a fee of $1,000 for each Board meeting attended in person and a fee of $500 foreach Board meeting attended by telephone. Non-employee members of the Board of Directors areentitled to receive a fee of $750 for each Board committee meeting attended in person, a fee of$500 for each Board committee meeting attended by telephone and a fee of $500 for each UnanimousWritten Consent in Lieu of Meeting adopted by the Board of Directors. However, Board committee feesare not paid if the meeting is held on the same day as a Board meeting. In accordance with theGolden Telecom 1999 Equity Participation Plan, non-employee directors are also entitled to receive10,000 stock options upon their initial appointment and 2,500 stock options for each subsequentyear of service.     The Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is entitled to receiveadditional annual compensation of $15,000 for serving as Chairman of the Audit Committee.     The Chairman of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is entitled to receiveadditional annual compensation of $15,000 for serving as Chairman of the Compensation Committee.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

VERA MARKS, on behalf of J.M., : 

: 

Plaintiff, : 

: 

v. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0425-M 

: 

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, : 

Commissioner of : 

Social Security, : 

: 

Defendant. : 

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT be

entered in favor of Defendant Michael J. Astrue and against

Plaintiff Vera Marks, on behalf of J.M.

DONE this 3rd day of March, 2010.

s/BERT W. MILLING, JR. 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00425-M Document 29 Filed 03/03/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.31(b)
 Highly Confidential
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
TRANSITION AND SUCCESSION AGREEMENT
     1.
    
    The following sentence is hereby added to the end of Section 5(a) of the Agreement:
  2.
    
    The following shall be added as a new Section 5(c):
 Conditions to Payment and Acceleration; Section 409A of the Code




---



##### 



provided however
 3.
    
    The last sentence of Section 7 is hereby amended by deleting the words of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code) and replacing them with of the Code.4.
    
    This Amendment shall be governed by, interpreted under and construed in accordance with the
laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.5.
    
    Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement is hereby confirmed in all respects.
  MYLAN INC./s/ Heather BreschBy:  Heather BreschTitle:
    Chief Operating Officer/s/ Daniel C. Rizzo, Jr.Daniel C. Rizzo, Jr. 2
Meeting Minutes

Grasping and Manipulation Performance Measures and Benchmarking

Held May 8, 2018

Joe Falco provided a brief overview of this meeting series and introduced Jeff Mahler of UC Berkeley.

Jeff Mahler provided a presentation of robotic grasping and manipulation benchmarking work at 

Berkeley. Jeff’s Power Point slides can be found here. A WebEx video recording of his presentation can 

be found here.

Joe Falco concluded with the following information.

• NIST will soon release two draft documents for public review:

o Performance Metrics and Test Methods for Robotic Hands

o Proposed Standard Terminology for Robotic Hands and Associated Performance Metrics

• The next Grasping and Manipulation Performance Benchmarks meeting will be held in the 

September timeframe.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6964

MANUEL A. MARIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RANDALL WILLIAMS, Warden of Lieber Correctional Institute; LIEUTENANT 

GRANT, Lieutenant at Lieber Correctional Institute; MAJOR CLARK, Major of 

Lieber Correctional Institute; RHU UNIT MANAGER/ CAPTAIN; MS. BIRCH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (2:19-cv-01270-DCC)

Submitted: October 20, 2020 Decided: October 23, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Manuel A. Marin, Appellant Pro Se. Gordon Wade Cooper, BUYCK, SANDERS & 

SIMMONS, LLC, Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Manuel A. Marin seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his “Motion 

to Amend to Conform to the Evidence.” This court may exercise jurisdiction only over 

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-

46 (1949). The order Marin seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| ý | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |

|                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                |  |  |
| New York                                                       |   | 16-0757636 |
| (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |   | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |

|                                          |
|------------------------------------------|
|                                          |  |  |
| East Aurora, New York                    |   | 14052-0018 |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices) |   | (Zip Code) |

|                                       |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                       |  |  |
| Title of Each Class                   |   | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
| Class A Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value |   | New York Stock Exchange |
| Class B Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value |   | New York Stock Exchange |

----

----

|                |
|----------------|
|                |  |  |
|  Item 15. |   | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. |

|     |                                         |
|-----|-----------------------------------------|
| (a) | Documents filed as part of this report: |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| (31.1) | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed herewith) |
|   |   |
| (31.2) | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed herewith) |

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
|   |   | MOOG INC. |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
| Dated: | December 16, 2014 | By: | /s/ Jennifer Walter |   |
|   |   | Name: | Jennifer Walter |   |
|   |   |   | Controller |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1








                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-41542 and No. 333-72036) pertaining to the 1999
Equity Participation Plan of Golden Telecom, Inc. and in the Post Effective
Amendment No. 1 (Form S-3 No. 333-39260) to Registration Statement on Form S-1
and related Prospectus of our report dated March 5, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Golden Telecom, Inc. included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.


/s/ Ernst & Young (CIS) Limited

Moscow, Russia
26 March 2002
PMI Fully-Toleranced Test Case 11 - View A

Includes Atomic Test Cases - 55, 100

 Models - 2014

Rev B

nist_ftc_11_asme1_rb

SPECIFIED):

EV. __ IS

RODUCT

MENSIONS

FINED ON

DENCE OVER

D BY THE

R

THE MODEL.

BASIC

S OTHERWISE

TO DATASET.

 TO

ANCING.

Y

 AND

EE STATE.

Feature and Specification Index

nist_ftc_11_asme1_rb_fsi.pdf
PMI Fully-Toleranced Test Case 11 - View B

Includes Atomic Test Cases - N/A

 Models - 2014

Rev B

nist_ftc_11_asme1_rb