alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
             CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
33-88646, 33-93550, 33-93552, 33-93554 and 33-93556 of Nabisco Holdings Corp. on
Form S-8, of our report dated January 26, 1998, appearing in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Nabisco Holdings Corp. and Nabisco, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1997.
 
Deloitte & Touche LLP
 
Parsippany, New Jersey
 
March 9, 1998
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Scott McRAE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-6020.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 2001.

Decided May 31, 2001.

Michael Scott McRae, pro se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, John Howarth Bennett, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

*194Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Scott McRae seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court.*
      *United States v. McRae,*Nos. CR-97-94-5-H; CA-00-465-5 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

We recently held in *United States v. Sanders,*247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.2001) (No. 00-6281), that the new rule announced in *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. Accordingly, McRae’s *Apprendi*claim is not cognizable.
#### The State, ex rel. Lee, *v.*Alvis, Warden.

(No. 4294

— Decided July 5, 1949.)

*Mr. Robert Lee, in propria persona.*

*Mr. Herbert S. Duffy,*attorney general, and *Mr. Walter R. Hill,*for respondent.

By the Court.

This is a proceeding in habeas corpus originating in this court.

Where the court which tried and sentenced a petitioner had jurisdiction of the person and of the offense charged and there is no showing of a denial of due process, the petitioner will not, in a habeas corpus proceeding, be discharged from custody. *State, ex rel. Conners,*v. *DeMuth, Supt.,*96 Ohio St., 519, 528, 118 N. E., 98; 20 Ohio Jurisprudence, 425, Section 6.

*Petitioner remanded, to custody.*

Miller, P. J., Hornbeck and Wiseman, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RCSB
FINANCIAL, INC'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED FEBRUARY
28, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000840068
<NAME> RCSB FINANCIAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                          86,102
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,721
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     18,433
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,606,196
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,591,028
<LOANS>                                      2,046,487
<ALLOWANCE>                                     28,217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,032,365
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,368,339
<SHORT-TERM>                                   964,836
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            194,710
<LONG-TERM>                                    188,040
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,815
<OTHER-SE>                                     301,625
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               4,032,365
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 44,936
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               29,269
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    91
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                74,296
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              25,534
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,066
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           32,230
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  85
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 30,241
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,889
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       9,692
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,692
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .63
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.45
<LOANS-NON>                                     21,374
<LOANS-PAST>                                     5,520
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                28,190
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,969
<RECOVERIES>                                       996
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               28,217
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            28,217
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JAMES PATRICK PREYEAR, *

(#06393-003) *

Petitioner, *

 * CRIMINAL NO. 05-00267-KD

vs. * CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-00286-KD-B

*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, *

Respondent. *

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue 

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated June 23, 2014, is ADOPTED

as the opinion of this Court.1

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Preyear’s petition for habeas corpus relief (Doc. 636) 

is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED, and further, that Preyear is not entitled to the 

issuance of a certificate of appealability or to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

DONE and ORDERED this the 24th day of July 2014.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose_________________

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

1 Preyear’s claim is without merit per Jeanty v. Warden, FC-Miami, 2014 WL 3411144, *2 (11th Cir. Jul. 

15, 2014) (“Alleyne does not apply retroactively on collateral review”[]).

Case 1:05-cr-00267-KD-B Document 638 Filed 07/24/14 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANDRE M. CARSTARPHEN, SR., : 

on behalf of 

ANDRE M. CARSTARPHEN, JR., : 

Plaintiff, : 

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 05-0359-WS-M 

 

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, : 

Commissioner of

Social Security, : 

Defendant. : 

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT be entered in favor of

Defendant Jo Anne B. Barnhart and against Plaintiff Andre M. Carstarphen, Sr. On behalf of Andre M.

Carstarphen, Jr.

DONE and ORDERED this 10th day of February, 2006.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00359-WS-M Document 18 Filed 02/10/06 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CaliforniaCoastal Communities, Inc. (the  “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raymond J.Pacini, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that based on my knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: August 7, 2003 | */s/  Sandra G. Sciutto* |   |
|----------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                 | Sandra G. Sciutto        |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

 

In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), the abovecertification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemedto be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except tothe extent that the Company explicitly incorporates it by reference in any suchfiling.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of The InterGroup Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David T. Nguyen, Treasurer and Controller of the Company,
serving as Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: October 17, 2005                          /s/ David T. Nguyen
                                                ----------------------------
                                                David T. Nguyen, Treasurer
                                                and Controller (serving as
                                                Chief Financial Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The InterGroup Corporation, Inc. and will be retained by The
InterGroup Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 231 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1568 

[Report No. 118–287] 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to protect personally identifiable 

information, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2023 

Mr. WALTZ (for himself and Mr. PASCRELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

DECEMBER 1, 2023 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on March 10, 2023] 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1568 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to protect personally 

identifiable information, and for other purposes. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 1568 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Moving Americans Pri5 vacy Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE IN7 FORMATION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 431(c) of 

9 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1431(c)) is amended to 

10 read as follows: 

11 ‘‘(2)(A) The information listed in paragraph (1) shall 

12 not be available for public disclosure if— 

13 ‘‘(i) the Secretary of the Treasury makes an af14 firmative finding on a shipment-by-shipment basis 

15 that disclosure is likely to pose a threat of personal 

16 injury or property damage; or 

17 ‘‘(ii) the information is exempt under the provi18 sions of section 552(b)(1) of title 5, United States 

19 Code. 

20 ‘‘(B) The Secretary shall ensure that any personally 

21 identifiable information, including Social Security num22 bers and passport numbers, is removed from any manifest 

23 signed, produced, delivered, or electronically transmitted 

24 under this section before access to the manifest is provided 

25 to the public.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
4 

•HR 1568 RH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by sub2 section (a) shall take effect on the date that is 30 days after 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Union Calendar No. 231 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1568 

[Report No. 118–287] 

A BILL 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to protect personposes. ally identifiable information, and for other purDECEMBER 1, 2023 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 74765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29279]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Hearings of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules 
of Civil Procedure

    Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcements: 79 FR 48250 
and 79 FR 72702.
AGENCY: Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure, Judicial 
Conference of the United States.

ACTION: Notice of Cancellation of Public Hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the 
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure has been canceled: Civil Rules 
Hearing, January 9, 2015, in Phoenix, Arizona.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan C. Rose, Secretary and Chief 
Rules Officer, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of 
the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-
1820.

    Dated: December 10, 2014.
Jonathan C. Rose,
Secretary and Chief Rules Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-29279 Filed 12-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
J-A29035-21

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

IN RE: TRUST UNDER WILL F/B/O 

CHARLES T. CAMPBELL, II

APPEAL OF: CHARLENE M. 

CAMPBELL AND THOMAS D. 

CAMPBELL

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

 PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 33 WDA 2021

Appeal from the Order Entered January 6, 2021

In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Orphans' Court at 

No(s): No. 02-19-02074

BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., BOWES, J., and PELLEGRINI, J.*

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY BOWES, J.: FILED: MARCH 3, 2022

I join my esteemed colleagues fully in the disposition of this matter. I 

write separately solely to note my disquietude regarding the procedure 

employed by the orphans’ court in initially appointing the GAL for Father. That 

is, it appears from the certified record and briefs that the orphans’ court judge

did not participate in the off-the-record hearing that preceded the 

appointment of the GAL. Instead, he delegated that task to his law clerk, who 

purportedly heard argument from counsel regarding the appointment of a GAL 

for Father and subsequently advised the judge that the parties had reached 

an agreement. In reliance on that communication, the orphans’ court issued 

the GAL appointment order. This was in clear derogation of the judge’s judicial 

duty to hear and decide cases. See Pa. Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 2, 

____________________________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
J-A29035-21

- 2 -

Rule 2.7 (“A judge shall hear and decide matters assigned to the judge, except

where the judge has recused himself or herself or when disqualification is 

required by Rule 2.11 or other law.”). Moreover, it erodes the public’s 

confidence in the integrity, independence, and impartiality of the judiciary. 

See Pa. Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 1, Rule 1.2 (“A judge shall act at all 

times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the independence, 

integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the 

appearance of impropriety.”). Children have consistently and vehemently 

challenged the propriety of the procedure underlying the appointment of the 

GAL.1 While I join my colleagues’ resolution of this issue, I believe that given 

the circumstances it is nonetheless imperative upon this Court to reiterate

that which is axiomatic, i.e., that such delegation of judicial duties constitutes 

neglect of those duties and undermines the public’s confidence in the judiciary. 

____________________________________________

1

In fact, in Children’s preliminary objection to the GAL’s petition for 

compensation, Children sought the recusal of the orphans’ court judge from 

this matter precisely because of the procedure utilized in appointing the GAL. 

Despite initially denying this request, that judge has since recused himself.
Exhibit 10.16


 


Description of Management Cash Bonus Plan


 


The following is a description
of the management cash bonus plan, as adopted by the board of directors of
Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc. on December 7, 2005.  The bonus plan provides for the payment of
annual cash bonuses to employees who are considered management level.  The bonus plan is administered by the board
of directors, which has full authority to select participants, set bonus
amounts and fix performance targets.  The
board receives recommendations from the compensation committee.


 


For each participant, a base
bonus amount is set. With respect to regional vice presidents and other
officers responsible for more than one region, 90% of the bonus is based on
meeting an income before taxes target and 10% of the bonus is based on meeting
a sales growth target, in each case in the region or regions for which the
officer is responsible. Corporate staff bonuses (other than the CEO) are based
on 90% on a company-wide income before taxes target and 10% on company-wide
sales growth target.  The full base bonus
is paid if the participant achieves 100% of both targets.  If the income before taxes target is not met
at the 100% level, the participant’s bonus with respect to that target will be
pro rated on a straight line basis if the participant achieves a range of 85%
to 100% of target, with no bonus paid at less than 85% of target. If the sales
growth target is not met at the 100% level, the participant will not receive a
bonus with respect to that target.  In
addition, each participant can receive an additional bonus equal to 5% of
income before taxes in excess of 100% of target, up to an amount equal to 60%
of the base bonus.


 


No award will be paid for any
fiscal year or portion thereof to a participant whose employment with the
company terminates during such year for a reason other than retirement,
disability, death or other reason approved by the board.  In all cases the payment is in the discretion
of the company and the company retains the right to terminate a participant’s
participation in the bonus plan at any time, in which case no bonus may be
paid.


 


The CEO’s bonus, as described
in his employment contract, is based on a performance target of EBITDA.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1602 

To repeal title IV of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer 

Protection Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2023 

Ms. PORTER (for herself, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. 

NADLER, Mr. EVANS, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. JAYAPAL, Mr. LYNCH, Ms. BONAMICI, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. 

LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. GOMEZ, Mr. BOWMAN, Mr. 

SWALWELL, Mr. POCAN, Mr. RASKIN, Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. AUCHINCLOSS, Ms. DELAURO, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. 

GARAMENDI, Ms. PRESSLEY, Mr. GALLEGO, Ms. BUSH, and Mr. ROBERT

GARCIA of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To repeal title IV of the Economic Growth, Regulatory 

Relief, and Consumer Protection Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secure Viable Banking 

5 Act’’ or the ‘‘SVB Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1602 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF BANKING REGULATIONS. 

2 Title IV of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, 

3 and Consumer Protection Act is repealed and the provi4 sions of law amended by such title are revived or restored 

5 as if such title had not been enacted. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS