MAKING AN IMPACT ON U.S. MANUFACTURING 

Welcome to the 2nd NIST MEP 

Regional Information Forum 

Diane Henderson, Federal Program Officer & Competition Manager, Center Operations, 

diane.henderson@nist.gov, NIST MEP 

Mark Troppe, Director, Partnerships and Program Development, mark.troppe@nist.gov, 

NIST MEP 

Tab Wilkins, Regional Manager, System Operations, bruce.wilkins@nist.gov, NIST MEP 

1 
MEP Overview 

Meeting Agenda 

• Introductions of Participants 

• Competition Background 

• Regional Forums 

– Private One-on-One Sessions 

• MEP Program Overview 

• Upcoming Federal Funding Opportunity 

• Discussion / Q&A 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 2 
MEP Overview 

Forum Protocols 

• The forums will provide general information regarding MEP and offer 

general guidance on preparing proposals. 

• NIST/MEP staff will be available during the forum to answer general 

questions. 

• NIST/MEP staff will provide information about the MEP eligibility and costsharing requirements, evaluation criteria and selection factors, selection 

process, and the general characteristics of a competitive MEP proposal 

during this webinar. 

• NIST/MEP staff cannot provide feedback regarding specific project ideas. 

• One-on-One sessions will provide an opportunity to ask questions related to 

the program and specifics of the federal funding opportunity. 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 3 
MAKING AN IMPACT ON U.S. MANUFACTURING

MEP State Competition 
MEP Overview 

Rationale for Competition 

• Allocate more funding to states with greater concentrations 

of manufacturers; 

• Empower MEP centers to experiment more with new 

products and services (i.e, technology acceleration, supply 

chain and workforce, etc), serving harder to serve clients 

like very small, emerging, rural companies; 

• Bring MEP practice closer to other federal programs that 

refresh awardees periodically. 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 5 
MEP Overview 

Competition Benefits to States

• Increased funding to bring $/SME up to national average 

• Immediate readjustment of the cost share to 1:1 for the first three years of the 

award * 

• A five year award reducing the annual renewal paperwork 

• A reduction in the number of panel reviews from every two years to one at the third 

year 

• Resetting of the funding levels to reflect the national recognition of the importance 

of manufacturing and the regional distribution of manufacturing activity** 

• Reduction and simplification of reporting requirements 

• Opportunity to re-align Center activities with State economic development 

strategies 

*Congressional action needed to make the readjustment permanent 

**Administration support for increased federal funding 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 6 
MEP Overview 

Round 1 Competition 

• Colorado, Connecticut, Indiana, Michigan, New 

Hampshire, North Carolina, Oregon, Tennessee, 

Texas, Virginia 

• Timeline: 

– FFO released August 1, 2014 

– Awards announced February 2015 

– Start Date July 1, 2015 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 7 
MEP Overview 

Round 1 Competition Awardees 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 8 

Awardees are: 

• Colorado: Manufacturer’s Edge (Boulder) 

• Connecticut: CONNSTEP, Inc., (Rocky Hill) 

• Indiana: Purdue University/Indiana MEP (Indianapolis) 

• Michigan: Industrial Technology Institute/Michigan Manufacturing Technology Center (Plymouth) 

• New Hampshire: New Hampshire Manufacturing Extension Partnership (Concord) 

• North Carolina: North Carolina State University/North Carolina Manufacturing Extension 

Partnership (Raleigh) 

• Oregon: Oregon Manufacturing Extension Partnership (Tigard) 

• Tennessee: University of Tennessee, Center for Industrial Services/Tennessee Manufacturing 

Extension Partnership (Nashville) 

• Texas: The University of Texas at Arlington/Texas Manufacturing Assistance Center (Arlington) 

• Virginia: A.L. Philpott Manufacturing Extension Partnership/GENEDGE Alliance (Martinsville) 
MEP Overview 

Status of Round 2 Competition 

• Alaska, Idaho, Illinois, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, 

Ohio*, Oklahoma, Utah, Washington, West Virginia, and 

Wisconsin 

• Timeline: 

– FFO released March 9, 2015 

– Awards for 9 of the 11 announced September 21, 2015 

– Start Date January 1, 2016 

*Ohio was initially included in Round 2, but did not result in a funding award. Ohio will be included in Round 3. 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 9 
MEP Overview 

Award Recipients for Round 2 – so far... 

The winners of the Round 2 MEP State Competition (9 of the 11) are: 

• Illinois - Illinois Manufacturing Excellence Center (Peoria) - $6,287,387 

• Minnesota - Enterprise Minnesota, Inc. (Minneapolis) - $3,317,060 

• West Virginia - West Virginia University Research Corporation (Morgantown) - $625,001 

• Alaska - Southwest Alaska Municipal Conference (Anchorage) – $332,245 

• Idaho - Boise State University (Idaho TechHelp -Boise) - $800,295 

• Washington - Washington Manufacturing Services DBA Impact Washington (Mukilteo) - $3,168,589 

• New Jersey - New Jersey Manufacturing Extension Program, Inc. (Cedar Knolls) - $3,518,032 

• Oklahoma - Oklahoma Alliance for Manufacturing Excellence, Inc. (Tulsa) - $1,636,450 

• New York - New York State Department of Economic Development (Albany) - $7,481,492 

Two states (UT/WI) are still under review 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 10 
MEP Overview 

Status of Round 3 Competition 

• Alabama, Arkansas, California, Georgia, Louisiana, 

Massachusetts, Missouri, Montana, Ohio*, 

Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, and Vermont 

• Timeline: 

– Target FFO release - January 2016 

– Proposals due date – Approx. April 2016 

– Anticipated Award announcement - June/July 2016 

– Start Date October 2016 

*Ohio was initially included in Round 2, but did not result in a funding award. Ohio will be included in Round 3. 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 11 
MEP Overview 

Round 3 States 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 12 

MEP Center Location and 

Assigned Geographical Service 

Area (by State)

Annual Federal Funding

Alabama $1,780,800

Arkansas $941,110

California $11,558,908

Georgia $2,552,258

Louisiana $588,870

Massachusetts $2,364,771

Missouri $2,109,748

Montana $512,000

Ohio $4,545,417

Pennsylvania $5,280,576

Puerto Rico $510,718

Vermont $500,000
MEP Overview 

Status of Round 4 Competition 

• Delaware, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, 

Mississippi, New Mexico, Nevada, North Dakota, 

South Carolina and Wyoming 

• Timeline: 

– Target FFO release – July 2016 

– Proposals due date – Approx. October 2016 

– Anticipated Award announcement - Early 2017 

– Start Date April 2017 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 13 
MEP Overview 

Round 4 States 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 14 

MEP Center Location and 

Assigned Geographical Service 

Area (by State)

Annual Federal Funding

Delaware $500,000

Hawaii $500,000

Iowa $1,859,206

Kansas $1,864,950

Maine $863,522

Mississippi $1,003,782

New Mexico $1,360,802

Nevada $756,001

North Dakota $500,000

South Carolina $2,268,003

Wyoming $500,000
MEP Overview 

Aggressive Outreach Effort 

• 15-20 organizations publicizing MEP Competition 

• Examples include SSTI, IEDC, EDA, NADO, etc. 

• Regional Meetings 

• Informational webinars for interested applicants 

– Round 3 Information Webinars to be conducted January and 

February 2016 

– Webinar recordings and presentations will be made available on the 

MEP website. 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 15 
MEP Overview 

Regional Forums 

• Prior to the federal funding opportunity announcement, 

NIST MEP will hold three regional forums to provide 

interested entities more information about the MEP 

program, the federal funding opportunity, and answer 

questions regarding this funding announcement. 

 

• Following each regional forum presentation, potential 

applicants will also have a chance to schedule 20 minute 

meetings with NIST MEP representatives to ask additional 

follow-on questions. 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 16 
MEP Overview 

Regional Forums 

• September 17, 2015 – Boston, MA 

– 10 participants (MA, PA and VT) 

• October 16, 2015 – San Francisco, CA 

• November 17, 2015 – Atlanta, GA 

 

• Agenda: 

9:30am – 11:30am – Presentation (overview of program, federal 

funding opportunity, evaluation criteria and selection factors) 

11:30am – 1:00pm – Private One-on-one meetings with NIST MEP 

representatives 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 17 
MAKING AN IMPACT ON U.S. MANUFACTURING 

MEP PROGRAM OVERVIEW 
MEP Overview 

MISSION 

To enhance the productivity and technological 

performance of U.S. Manufacturing. “

“

ROLE 

MEP’s state and regional centers facilitate and accelerate the transfer 

of manufacturing technology in partnership with industry, universities 

and educational institutions, state governments, and NIST and other 

federal and research laboratories and agencies. 

 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301)975-5020 www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 19 
MEP Overview 

MEP Program in Short 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301)975-5020 20 

MEP System Budget 

$130 Million Federal Budget 

with Cost Share 

Requirements for Centers 

Global Competitiveness 

Program was created by the 

1988 Omnibus Trade And 

Competitive Act 

Evolving Role 

Program continues to evolve in 

order to support manufacturers 

during changing economic 

situations. 

Program Started in 1988 

At least one center in all 50 

states by 1996 

National Network 

60 Centers with over 550 Field Locations. System 

wide, Non-Federal Staff is over 1,200. Contracting 

over 3,200 third party service providers. 

Partnership Model 

Federal, State 

and Industry 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020
MEP Overview 

MEP Strategic Plan 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 21 

MISSION

To enhance the productivity and technological 

performance of U.S. manufacturing.

		

ROLE

MEP ‘s state and regional centers facilitate and 

accelerate the transfer of manufacturing 

technology in partnership with industry, 

universities and educational institutions, state 

governments, and NIST and other federal research 

laboratories and agencies.

• National program with at least one center 

in every state and Puerto Rico.

• Federal/state, public-private partnership 

with local fexibility.

• Cost share policy that matches federal 

investment with state and private sector 

investment.

• Market driven program that responds to 

the needs of private sector manufacturers.

• Leverage partnering expertise as a strategic 

advantage. 

• Local knowledge of, focus on, and access to 

manufacturers.

PROGRAMMATIC STRENGTHS:
MEP Overview www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301)975-5020 22 

MEP Strategic Plan (2014-2017) 

Strategic Goals 

ENHANCE COMPETITIVENESS

Enhance the competitiveness of U.S. 

manufacturers, with particular focus 

on small and medium-sized 

companies.

CHAMPION MANUFACTURING

Serve as a voice to and a voice for 

manufacturing and manufacturers 

in engaging policy makers, 

stakeholders, and clients.

SUPPORT PARTNERSHIPS

Support national, state, and regional 

manufacturing eco-systems and 

partnerships.

DEVELOP CAPABILITIES

Develop MEP’s capabilities as a 

learning organization and high 

performance system.

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020
MEP Overview www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301)975-5020 23 

Partnering to Drive a National Program 

The MEP network focuses on 

solving manufacturers’ biggest 

challenges and identifying 

opportunities for growth. 

Nearly 300,000 Manufacturers 

Over 3,200 Affiliated Service 

Providers 

Over 1,200 Center Staff 

559 Service 

Locations 

National 

Network 

Customers 

Small and Medium Size 

Manufacturers 

MEP Program 

Integration, Knowledge 

Sharing, and Evaluation 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020
MEP Overview 

National Network 

wwww.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 24 

s mfg@nist.gov (301)975-5020 
MEP Overview www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301)975-5020 25 

Center Structure Diversity 

Partnerships 

• Single location 

• Principal organization with independent partner organizations 

• Central office with regional offices 

• Headquarters operation with multiple field offices 

Utilizes existing local resources to 

provide manufacturing extension 

services relies heavily on 

partnerships 

Public & Private 

Sector 

Staff are employees of the 

Center and its partners – 

not the Federal 

Government 

Geography 

Urban and Rural Areas. 

Centers are never more than 2 

hours away of a manufacturer. 

Organization Type 

Nonprofit 

University 

State Government 

Organizational Structure Nonprofit	 University	 State	Gov't	

33	

18	

7	

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020
MEP Overview www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301)975-5020 26 

How Centers work with Manufacturers 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020

Initial Contact 

Group sessions, 

referral

Assessment 

Informal walkthrough, detailed 

company analysis 

Identify 

Find potential issues, 

define proposed 

project and approach 

for solving it 

Negotiate 

Consult with company 

and sign project 

contract with fee paid 

to center

Project 

Execution 

Center staff, partner 

organization, and/or 

third party consultants

Project impact data collected by contractor 

for NIST approximately 6 months after 

project completion 

Follow-Up 

After completion, project 

follow-up by center to 

assure customer 

satisfaction and explore 

further project 

opportunities 
MEP Overview www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301)975-5020 27 

What MEP Does 

Work with small and medium size manufacturers to help 

them create and retain jobs, increase profits and save 

time and money 

Focus on meeting manufacturer’s short term needs, but 

in context of overall company strategy. 

Reach over 30,000 manufacturing firms and complete 

over 10,000 projects per year. 

Provides companies with a consistent set of services 

including: 

Technology 

Acceleration 

Supply Chain 

Development 

Workforce 

Development 

Innovation 

and Growth 

Lean 

Process Sustainability 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020
MEP Overview www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301)975-5020 28 

Client Challenges 

69% 

53% 

48% 

41% 

21% 

14% 14% 12% 

8% 

0% 

10% 

20% 

30% 

40% 

50% 

60% 

70% 

80% 

Cost Reduction Growth Product Development Employee Recruitment Sustainability Technology Needs Manage Partners Financing Exporting 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020
MEP Overview www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301)975-5020 29 

MEP Program Initiatives & Services 

MEP’s Program Initiatives & Services 

are aimed to help manufacturers identify opportunities that will accelerate and strengthen their 

growth and competitiveness in the global marketplace

Growth and Innovation Sustainability Supply Chain 

Technology Acceleration Workforce Make it in America 

Export 

Continuous Improvement 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020
MEP Overview www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 30 

Partnerships 

Centers serve as an invaluable partner to the 

manufacturing community by: 

Educating 

local and regional partners on 

small and medium sized 

manufacturer needs and 

drivers of behavior. 

Connecting the Gap 

between technology developers / 

R&D organizations and 

manufacturers: finding firms that are 

interested in a particular technology, 

as well as informing tech developers 

of manufacturer’s technology needs

Providing Outreach 

to manufacturers by 

connecting them to other 

programs and services offered 

by partner organizations. 

Supporting 

workforce development 

programs. 
MEP Overview 

NIST MEP Survey Process, Instrument, & Uses 

• Surveys are conducted quarterly. Approximately 7,500 to 8,000 

surveys done annually. Response rates typically hover around 

75-80 percent. 

• Clients are surveyed only once a year. A census of all clients 

with completed projects. 

• Survey is client-based rather than project based. 

• Client-based survey done since 2000. (@ 104,000 thousand 

surveys attempted) 

• Survey is done using a third party. Fors Marsh conducts the 

survey. Surveys are done typically on-line. 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 31 
MEP Overview 

NIST MEP Survey Process, Instrument, & Uses 

• Surveys are done typically six months after the first project is 

completed and questions are time bound. In some cases, clients 

can be surveyed over multiple years even if only one project is 

completed. 

• Survey consists of 12 questions focusing on: • Bottom-line client outcomes such as sales, capital investment, cost savings, and employment 

• Questions about challenges, reasons for using the MEP, use of other external resources, and customer satisfaction (Net 

Promoter) 

• Survey results used for GPRA, budget and program decisions, 

and also to develop a series of metrics to determine relative 

center performance and targets for improvement. 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 32 
MEP Overview www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301)975-5020 33 

Client Impacts 

= 1,000 manufacturers

30,056

Manufacturers

served in FY20141

$2.7

Billion

NEW CLIENT 

INVESTMENTS

$1.1

Billion

COST SAVINGS

$4.2 

Billion

$2.5 

Billion

NEW SALES

46,069 17,883

JOBS RETAINED JOBS CREATED RETAINED SALES

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020
MAKING AN IMPACT ON U.S. MANUFACTURING 

MEP State Competition – Round 3 

Federal Funding Opportunity 
MEP Overview 

Funding Opportunity Overview (1) 

Funding Opportunity Title: Award Competitions for Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) Centers in the States of Alabama, Arkansas, California, Georgia, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Missouri, Montana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Puerto 

Rico, and Vermont 

Funding Opportunity Description: 

• NIST invites applications from eligible organizations in connection with NIST’s funding up to twelve (12) separate MEP 

cooperative agreements for the operation of an MEP Center in the designated States’ service areas identified above. 

NIST anticipates awarding one (1) cooperative agreement for each of the identified States. 

• Objective of the MEP Center Program is to provide manufacturing extension services to primarily small and medium-sized 

manufacturers within the whole State designated in the applications. 

 

Funding Instrument: Cooperative Agreement 

– The nature of NIST’s “substantial involvement” will generally be collaboration between MEP and the recipient 

organization(s). 

– NIST involvement under base MEP awards may include the types of substantial involvement activities described in 

Final Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance Implementing the Federal Grant and Cooperative 

Agreement Act, 43 Fed. Reg. 36860-65 (Aug. 18, 1978). 

– In addition, NIST involvement in this cooperative agreement may include the activities described in MEP General 

Term and Condition 10. 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 35 
MEP Overview 

Funding Opportunity Overview (2) 

Funding Available: 

– NIST anticipates funding twelve (12) MEP Center awards with an initial five-year period of performance in accordance 

with the multi-year funding policy. Initial funding for the states in Round 3 is contingent upon the availability of 

appropriated funds. 

– Below are the twelve (12) States identified for funding as part of this FFO: 

36 

MEP Center Location and 

Assigned Geographical Service 

Area (by State)

Annual Federal Funding

Alabama $1,780,800

Arkansas $941,110

California $11,558,908

Georgia $2,552,258

Louisiana $588,870

Massachusetts $2,364,771

Missouri $2,109,748

Montana $512,000

Ohio $4,545,417

Pennsylvania $5,280,576

Puerto Rico $510,718

Vermont $500,000

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 
MEP Overview 

Funding Opportunity Overview (3) 

Multi-Year Funding Policy. 

• When an application for a multi-year award is approved, funding will usually be provided for only the first year of 

the project. 

• Recipients will be required to submit detailed budgets and budget narratives prior to the award of any continued 

funding. 

• Continued funding for the remaining years of the project will be awarded by NIST on a non-competitive basis, 

and may be adjusted higher or lower from year-to-year of the award, contingent upon satisfactory performance, 

continued relevance to the mission and priorities of the program, and the availability of funds. 

• Continuation of an award to extend the period of performance and/or to increase or decrease funding is at the 

sole discretion of NIST. 

Potential for Additional 5 Years. 

• Initial awards issued pursuant to this FFO are expected to be for up to five (5) years with the possibility for NIST 

to renew the award, on a non-competitive basis, for an additional 5 years at the end of the initial award period. 

• The review processes in 15 C.F.R. § 290.8 will be used as part of the overall assessment of the recipient, 

consistent with the potential long-term nature and purpose of the program. 

• In considering renewal for a second five-year, multi-year award term, NIST will evaluate the results of the 

annual reviews and the results of the 3rd Year peer-based Panel Review findings and recommendations as set forth in 15 C.F.R. § 290.8, as well as the Center’s progress in addressing findings and recommendations made 

during the various reviews. 

• The full process is expected to include programmatic, policy, financial, administrative, and responsibility 

assessments, and the availability of funds, consistent with Department of Commerce and NIST policies and 

procedures in effect at that time. 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 37 
MEP Overview 

Funding Opportunity Overview (4) 

• Cost Share or Matching Requirements: 

Non-Federal cost sharing of at least 50 percent of the total project costs is required for each of the first through the third year of the 

award, with an increasing minimum non-federal cost share contribution beginning in year 4 of the award as follows: 

• Non-Federal cost sharing is that portion of the project costs not borne by the Federal Government. The applicant’s share of the MEP 

Center expenses may include cash, services, and third party in-kind contributions, as described at 2 C.F.R. § 200.306, as applicable, and in 

the MEP program regulations at 15 CFR § 290.4(c). No more than 50% of the applicant’s total non-Federal cost share for any year of 

the award may be from third party in-kind contributions of part-time personnel, equipment, software, rental value of centrally 

located space, and related contributions, per 15 CFR § 290.4(c)(5). The source and detailed rationale of the cost share, including cash, 

full- and part-time personnel, and in-kind donations, must be documented in the budget tables and budget narratives submitted with the 

application and will be considered as part of the review under the evaluation criterion found in Section V.1.c.ii. of this FFO. 

• Recipients must meet the minimum non-federal cost share requirements for each year of the award as identified in the chart 

above. For purposes of the MEP Program, “program income” (as defined in 2 C.F.R. § 200.80, as applicable) generated by an MEP Center 

may be used by a recipient towards the required non-federal cost share under an MEP award. 

38 

Year of Center Operation Maximum NIST Share Minimum Non-Federal Share

1-3 1/2 1/2

4 2/5 3/5

5 and beyond 1/3 2/3

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 
MEP Overview 

Funding Opportunity Overview (5) 

Possible Revenue/Cost Share Sources: 

– State Funding 

– Client Revenues (Program Income also know as Project Service 

Fees 

– In-Kind 

– Sponsored Projects 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 39 
MEP Overview 

Funding Opportunity Overview (6) 

• Eligible Applicants. 

– Each applicant for and recipient of an MEP award must be a U.S.-based nonprofit institution or organization. For 

the purpose of this FFO, nonprofit institutions include public or private nonprofit organizations, nonprofit or State 

colleges and universities, public or nonprofit community and technical colleges, and State, local or Tribal 

governments. Existing MEP awardees and new applicants who meet the eligibility criteria set forth in this section 

may apply. 

– An eligible organization may work individually or may include proposed subawards to eligible organizations or 

proposed contracts with any other organization as part of the applicant’s proposal, effectively forming a team. 

– NIST generally will not fund applications that propose an organizational or operational structure that, in whole or 

in part, delegates or transfers to another person, institution, or organization the applicant’s responsibility for core 

MEP Center management and oversight functions. See also Section IV.6. of the FFO for funding restrictions 

under the MEP Program. 

– For profit entities are not eligible. 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 40 
MEP Overview 

Evaluation Review Criteria: 

The applications will be evaluated based on the evaluation criteria described below. 

a. Executive Summary and Project Narrative (40 – Sub-criteria I through iv will be weighted equally) 

i. Center Strategy 

ii. Market Understanding 

1. Market Segmentation 

2. Needs Identification and Product/Service Offerings 

iii. Business Model 

1. Outreach and Service Delivery to the Market 

2. Partnership Leverage and Linkages 

iv. Performance Measurement and Management 

b. Qualifications of the Applicant; Key Personnel, Organizational Structure and Management; and Oversight Board and Governance 

(30 – Sub-criteria i and ii will be weighted equally) 

i. Key Personnel, Organizational Structure and Management 

ii. Oversight Board and Governance 

c. Budget and Financial Plan (30 – Sub-criteria will be weighted equally) 

i. Budget 

ii. Quality of the Financial Plan for Meeting the Award’s Non-Federal Cost Share Requirements over 5 years. 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 41 
MEP Overview 

Review and Selection Process 

Proposals Received 

Preliminary Quality 

Review 

Evaluation Panel: 

Full Technical 

Review 

Evaluation Panel 

Deliberations 

Teleconferences/

Video Conferences/

Site Visits 

Ranking Against All 

Evaluation Criteria Final Selection 

Negotiations 

Cooperative 

Agreement 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 42 
MEP Overview 

Administrative Requirements of Application (1) 

• Complete applications/proposals must, at a minimum, include the following forms and documents and 

meet the following requirements identified in the FFO which are: 

• Required Forms*: 

• SF-424 Application for Federal Assistance 

• SF-424A’s Budget Information Non-Constructions (Years 1-4) and separate SF424a 

 for Year 5 

• SF-424B Assurances Non-construction 

• CD-511 Certification Regarding Lobbying 

• SF-LLL Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (if applicable) 

• Technical Proposal (please be sure to read Section IV.2.a.6 of FFO) 

*Forms are available as part of the Grants.gov application kit 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 43 
MEP Overview 

Administrative Requirements of Application (2) 

Proposal Requirements: 

• Technical Proposal. The five (5) year Technical Proposal is a word-processed document not exceeding 40 pages responsive to the program 

description and the evaluation criteria. The following is a suggested format that applicants may use for the technical proposal. 

– Table of Contents (Does not count towards page limit) 

– Executive Summary - The executive summary should briefly (usually no longer than two pages) describe the proposed project, consistent with 

the evaluation sub-criteria outlined in the FFO. Applicants should name the State in which they are seeking to establish an MEP Center 

in the first sentence of the Executive Summary. 

Please note, if an applicant’s proposal is selected for funding, NIST may use all or a portion of the Executive Summary as part of a 

press release issued by NIST, or for other public information and outreach purposes. Applicants are advised not to incorporate 

information that concerns business trade secrets or other confidential commercial or financial information as part of the Executive 

Summary. See also 15 C.F.R. § 4.9(c) concerning the designation of business information by the applicant. (Does not count towards 

page limit). 

– Project Narrative 

– Qualifications of the Applicant; Key Personnel, Organizational Structure and Program Management; and Oversight Board and 

Governance 

– Budget Tables and Budget Narratives 

• A suggested format is provided on the MEP website - refer to Round 2 MEP State Competitions - 

http://nist.gov/mep/ffo-state-competitions-02.cfm

• Letters of Commitment or Support – DOES NOT COUNT TOWARDS PAGE LIMIT 

• For non-profit applicants with a fiduciary board of directors, a resolution from such board authorizing submission of the MEP Center 

application to NIST and supporting the activities described therein is required. 

• Applicant Non-Federal Cost Sharing (Cash and In-Kind) is required from an authorized representative 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 44 
MEP Overview 

Administrative Requirements of Application (3) 

• Indirect Cost Rate Agreement 

– If indirect costs are included in the proposed budget, provide a copy of the approved negotiated agreement if this 

rate was negotiated with a cognizant Federal audit agency. 

– If the rate was not established by a cognizant Federal audit agency, provide a statement to this effect. If the 

successful applicant includes indirect costs in the budget and has not established an indirect cost rate with a 

cognizant Federal audit agency, the applicant will be required to obtain such a rate in accordance with the DoC

Financial Assistance Standard Terms and Conditions. 

• Resumes 

– One-page resumes of no more than five key personnel may be included; these do not count toward 

the page limit. 

– Any information beyond one page for each resume and any additional resumes submitted will not 

be considered. 

• SF-424A, Budget Information - Non-Construction Programs for year five (5)

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 45 
MEP Overview 

Administrative Requirements of Application (4) 

• Application Format (Section IV 2(b)): 

– Page Limit. The Technical Proposals are limited to forty (40) pages. Information on 

pages beyond the page limit will not be considered. 

– Page limit includes: Cover page, Technical Proposal (with the exception of the 

Executive Summary), figures, graphs, tables, images, pictures, and all other pages of 

an application, with the exception of the page limit exclusions listed below. 

– Page limit excludes: Table of Contents, Executive Summary, SF-424, Application for 

Federal Assistance; both copies of the SF-424A, Budget Information – NonConstruction Programs form; SF-424B, Assurances – Non-Construction Programs; SFLLL, Disclosure of Lobbying Activities; CD-511, Certification Regarding Lobbying; Table 

of Contents, budget tables and budget narratives; Letters of Commitment and/or 

Support; Indirect Cost Rate Agreement, and Resumes. 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 46 
MEP Overview 

Administrative Requirements of Application (5) 

VERY IMPORTANT! 

• Unique Entity Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM). 

– Pursuant to 2 C.F.R. part 25, applicants and recipients (as the case may be) are required to: 

• (i) be registered in SAM before submitting its application; 

• (ii) provide a valid unique entity identifier in its application; and 

• (iii) continue to maintain an active SAM registration with current information at all times during which it has 

an active Federal award or an application or plan under consideration by a Federal awarding agency, 

unless otherwise excepted from these requirements pursuant to 2 C.F.R. § 25.110. 

– When developing your submission timeline, keep in mind that (1) a free annual registration process in 

the electronic System for Award Management (SAM) (see Section IV.3) may take between three and five 

business days or as long as more than two weeks, and (2) applicants using Grants.gov will receive a 

series of receipts over a period of up to two business days before learning via a validation or rejection 

whether a Federal agency’s electronic system has received its application. 

– Please note that the person listed as the authorized representative in SAM must be the one 

who submits application into grants.gov! 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 47 
MEP Overview 

Reporting Requirements 

• Financial Reports. The Recipient shall submit an SF-425, Federal Financial Report on a 

semi-annual basis after the sixth and twelfth month of each operating year 

• Performance (Technical) Reports. The Recipient shall submit a Technical Report (format 

provided by MEP Program) on a semi-annual basis after the sixth and twelfth month of 

each operating 

• Post Client Project Follow-Up. The recipient will be required to provide client and project 

data on a quarterly basis. 

• For further information regarding the NIST MEP Reporting Process, you may download a 

copy of the NIST MEP Reporting Guidelines at 

http://nist.gov/mep/ffo-state-competitions-02.cfm. 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 48 
MEP Overview 

MEP Resources 

49 

Additional Resources are available at 

http://nist.gov/mep/ffo-regional-forum-state-competitions-03.cfm 

• NIST MEP System Strategic Plan; 

• Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership Operating Plan Guidelines (February 

2015); 

• Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership General Terms and Conditions 

(February 2015); 

• 2014 Annual Report; 

• Sample Budget Table (for all 5 years) and Budget Chart and Narrative (for Year 1); and 

• NIST MEP Reporting Guidelines 

• Reports on the MEP Program 

• Round 2 FFO - 

http://www.nist.gov/mep/upload/NIST-MEP-STATES-COMPETITION-FFO-ROUNDMEP-Final-1.pdf

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 
MEP Overview 

Key Take-Aways

• Form an internal team, breaking down the application into sections that you can assign a 

champion to. i.e. finance, market, products and services. Meet frequently to start building the 

story. 

• Invest in a good writer to edit and help with the flow of the application. It is extremely helpful since 

you will have a lot of information that needs to fit into the 40 pages. 

• The application would be hard to achieve without a strategic plan for your organization in its 

present state. Make sure your strategic plan is up to date and has clear goals and metrics. 

• Make sure you have done a good analysis of the market needs especially the needs of the small, 

rural, emerging manufacturers. 

• Share your strategic goals - should align with state, federal, others' goals. If you don't have a 

strategic plan, develop one for the next 5 years. 

• Get input from the stakeholders. 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 50 
MEP Overview 

Key Take-Aways

• Make sure to read entire FFO (multiple times) 

• Key Personnel cannot be employed both at the prime and sub-recipient organization. 

• Ensuring you are meeting the minimum cost share requirement for all 5 years. 

• Board Governance: 

– Each Center shall establish and maintain an oversight board that is broadly representative of local 

stakeholders with a majority of board members drawn from local small- and medium-sized manufacturing 

firms. 

– Members of a Center’s oversight board may not concurrently serve on more than one Center’s oversight 

board. 

– If a Center’s oversight board does not meet the requirements of this paragraph at any time during the term 

of an MEP award, the Center must disclose the deficiencies to the FPO and must submit a detailed plan to 

the FPO for bringing its oversight board into compliance with this term within 12 months. 

– Additionally, each Center oversight board shall adopt bylaws governing the operation of the board, 

including a conflict of interest policy to ensure relevant relationships are disclosed and proper recusal 

procedures are in place. 

• SAM.gov registration has been established and organization has received confirmation of validated 

account (Recommend completing well in advance of submitting application in grants.gov) 

• Negotiations take place between NIST and the applicant organization not the subrecipients. 

• Tell your story. 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 51 
MEP Overview 

Agency Contacts 

52 

Subject Area Point of Contact

Administrative, budget, cost-sharing, 

eligibility questions and other programmatic 

questions.

Diane Henderson

Manufacturing Extension Partnership

NIST

Phone: 301-975-5105

Fax: 301-963-6556

E-mail: mepffo@nist.gov

Technical Assistance with Grants.gov 

Submissions

Christopher Hunton

Administrative Support & Document Control 

Office

NIST

Phone: 301-975-5718

Fax: 301-975-8884

E-mail: christopher.hunton@nist.gov

Grant Rules and Regulations Jannet Cancino

Grants Management Division

NIST

Phone: 301-975-6544

Fax: 301-975-6368

E-mail: jannet.cancino@nist.gov 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 
MEP Overview 

Have additional questions..... 

53 

Please submit all questions in writing to NIST MEP, mepffo@nist.gov

Questions and Answers from Regional Forums will be posted on the NIST MEP 

Regional Forum website, 

http://nist.gov/mep/ffo-regional-forum-state-competitions-03.cfm 

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 
MEP Overview 

Stay Connected 

Search NISTMEP or NIST_MEP

VISIT OUR BLOG! 

http://nistmep.blogs.govdelivery.com

Get the latest NISTMEP news at: 

www.nist.gov/mep

www.nist.gov/mep mfg@nist.gov (301) 975-5020 54