alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10K FOR THE YEAR 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          55,715
<SECURITIES>                                    68,904
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,930
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               310,236
<PP&E>                                           4,289
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 431,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          383,410
<BONDS>                                         12,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,744
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,060<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   431,214
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,981
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,957
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,020
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,663
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,345
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,318
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,318
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES UNREALIZED LOSS ON SECURITIES AFS OF 36
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

ANTHONY N. JONES, #112734, : 

 Plaintiff, : 

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0835-CG-M 

GRANTT CULLIVER, et al., : 

 

 Defendants. : 

ORDER

 After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the 

issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation 

to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made 

under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED

that the claims against Defendants Culliver, Patterson, Folk, and Hicks be dismissed without 

prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to 

state a claim upon which relief can be granted; that the claims against Defendants White, 

Thomas, and Marks be dismissed without prejudice for lack of venue; and that the request for a 

preliminary injunction be denied as moot. It is further ORDERED that this action proceed in 

regard to the claims against the other Defendants. 

DONE and ORDERED this 23rd day of August, 2010. 

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:09-cv-00835-CG-M Document 37 Filed 08/23/10 Page 1 of 1
#### Peter Murphy *v.*Thomas McRoberts.

Executo r — E j e ctment — H eirs.

A personal representative empowered to sell land by the terms of a will bas no right to maintain an action of ejectment against those in possession. Thei title to such land is in the heirs and they must be made parties to such a suit.

APPEAL FROM PENDLETON CIRCUIT COURT.

February 29, 1876.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

We have been referred to no authority by counsel for the appellees giving to the personal representative empowered 'to sell land by the will of the devisor the right to maintain an action of ejectment against those in possession. In this case there is a mere naked power to sell, and the legal title to the land is in the heirs of the devisor. A power of attorney to sell and convey passes to the attorne)'no such title as will enable him to maintain ejectment. Nor does it appear that the petition of the heir in this case to be made a party was ever acted on. There was no answer filed to that petition, nor was the heir made a party plaintiff by an order of court.

The administrator in this case had settled his accounts many years prior to the institution of the action and the heirs had released him, according to his own statement, from complying with that provision *623of the will directing- a sale of the land. Hei may have acted as the agent of the heirs, and with the authority to sell may have assumed the power to control the realty; but he was vested with no such title as enabled him to maintain ejectment. We are rather inclined to the opinion, however, that the parties in the court below regarded the filing of the petition of Henry Guess as making him a party to the record. There seems to have been no objection to its filing, and as the appellants, by their answer, asked that the heirs should be brought before the court, the case should be heard on his petition. Upon the return of the case he should, by an order of court, be made a party plaintiff, with leave to amend so as to unite the other heirs with him and to give a more definite description of the land.

*C. H. Lee, for appellant. W. J. Perrin, for appellee.*

We see no interest that the administrator, with will annexed, had in the controversy unless the heirs or those interested should require that he should execute the trust, and it is only from the fáct that the petition of- Guess was filed without objection, and the inference from the facts that he was regarded as a party to the record by the appellants, that he be allowed to amend his petition. Although he may have been regarded as a party, we are not disposed to uphold the verdict upon the pleadings as they now appear. The casé must .go back for further preparation.

The judgment is *reversed*and cause remanded with directions to award appellants a new trial, and for further proceedings consiistent with the opinion.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XVIII  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form  10-Q  for
the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XVIII, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XVIII,  Inc.,  each  certify, pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ ROBERT P JOHNSON
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XVIII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 10, 2009



                          /s/ PATRICK W KEENE
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XVIII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 10, 2009
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2






                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333 - 41542) pertaining to the 1999 Equity Participation
Plan of Golden Telecom, Inc. of our report dated February 13, 2001, with respect
to the financial statements and schedule of EDN Sovintel LLC, included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Golden Telecom, Inc. for the year ended December
31, 2000.


/s/ Ernst & Young (CIS) Limited


Moscow, Russia
12 March 2001
move FLIP A
IFTalk He3nmr "He3PolFlipOff()"
IFTalk He3nmr "He3AnaFlipOff()"
RL-2015.03.28-10K EX10.9






Exhibit 10.9


AMENDMENT NO. 2
to the
AMENDED AND RESTATED
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




AMENDMENT ("Amendment No. 2"), effective as of the 29th day of March 2015, by and between Ralph Lauren Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Jackwyn Nemerov (the “Executive”). 
 
WHEREAS, the Executive is party to an Employment Agreement by and between the Company and the Executive dated November 1, 2013, as amended March 30, 2014 (the "Employment Agreement"); and


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to amend the Employment Agreement in certain respects;


NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be bound, the parties hereby agree as follows.


		
	1.
	Section 1.4(c) of the Employment Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows, effective as of the date set forth above:




"During the Term, the Executive shall be eligible to participate in the Ralph Lauren Corporation 2010 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, or any successor thereto (the "Incentive Plan").  All grants to the Executive of stock options, restricted share units, performance share units, and any other form of equity award, if any, are governed by the terms of the Incentive Plan and are subject, in all cases, to approval by the Compensation and Organizational Development Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Compensation Committee") in its sole discretion.  In accordance with the Executive’s Term Sheet and with the terms of the Incentive Plan, the Executive shall receive, during the Term, annual grants of equity awards that are equivalent to the award amounts specified in the Executive’s Term Sheet, subject to Executive’s continued employment at the time of each such grant.  Such awards shall vest in accordance with the terms of the Incentive Plan." 
 


2.    The third paragraph in the "Annual Equity Awards" section of Exhibit 1 to the Employment Agreement is amended to add the following additional sentence, effective as of the date set forth above:


"For all equity awards beginning in Fiscal 2016, the conversion of annual grant value shall be based on the Fair Market Value on the applicable grant date, as approved by the Compensation Committee."


3.    Except as amended and/or modified by this Amendment No. 2, the Employment Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed and all other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, unaltered and unchanged by this Amendment No. 2.







1








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 2 to be duly executed and the Executive has hereunto set her hand, effective as of the date first set forth above.




	
			
	 
	RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	  /s/ Ralph Lauren

	 
	 
	Ralph Lauren

	 
	 
	Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 
	 

	 
	Date: May 4, 2015

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	EXECUTIVE

	 
	 
	 

	 
	  /s/ Jackwyn Nemerov

	 
	Jackwyn Nemerov

	 
	 
	 

	 
	Date: April 30, 2015







2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000840459
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND XVIII LTD PARTNERHSIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         702,173
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,940
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               721,113
<PP&E>                                      16,639,777
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,232,033)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,128,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          456,335
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,672,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,128,857
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               479,450
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  181,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                444,653
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            444,653
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   444,653
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    21.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    21.05
        

</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Ecology Mir Group ) ASBCA No. 62507

)

Under Contract No. W91364

- 20

- P

- 0025 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Mr. Adham Yusupov

CEO

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Scott N. Flesch, Esq.

Army Chief Trial Attorney

MAJ Nicholas Lucchetti, JA

Dana J. Chase, Esq.

Trial Attorney s

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The appeal has been withdrawn. Accordingly, it is dismissed from the Board’s

docket with prejudice.

Dated: July 7 , 2020

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62507

, Appeal of Ecology Mir

Group , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: July 7, 2020 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
 Pursuant
        to
 18
        U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
        Adopted pursuant to
 Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I,
        Zeynep
        Hakimoglu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
        of
        ClearOne Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December
        31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
        Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of ClearOne Communications,
        Inc.
 
 
 
 Date:  February
                  11, 2008
              By:
              /s/
                  Zeynep HakimogluZeynep
                  HakimogluChairman,
                  President and Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
                  Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 A
        signed original of the written statement above required by Section 906 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to ClearOne Communications,
        Inc.
        and will be retained by ClearOne Communications, Inc. and furnished to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  1
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1421 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1421

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
        of the exclusion for dependent care assistance programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2023

Ms. Schrier (for herself and Mr. Fitzpatrick) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
        of the exclusion for dependent care assistance programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Child Care for Working 
Families Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATION OF EXCLUSION FOR DEPENDENT CARE 
              ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 129(a)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``$5,000 ($2,500'' and inserting 
``$10,500 (half such dollar amount''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid or incurred in calendar years beginning after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bay View Capital Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the
Report), I, John Okubo, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                 
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company for the periods presented therein.

Date: August 14, 2003



| | /s/ John Okubo
John Okubo
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Bay View Capital Corporation and will be retained by Bay View
Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
World of 

Io(M)T

ANN MEHRA

UAMEHRA@POST.HARVARD.EDU

US SECRETARY OF COMMERCE NIST IOTAB MEMBER

18-19 JANUARY 2023
125,000,000,000

2030

Trillions in New 

Economic Activity 

Generated

Developing Innovation and Growing the Internet of Things Act

DIGIT Act

2019
Source: MIT
JBI: Internet of Things in Medicine: A Systematic Mapping Study (2000-2018)
The Internet of Medical Things 

(IoMT)

2016 →

FDA Commissions →

MDIC →

Establish National Evaluation 

System for Health Technology 

(NEST) Coordinating Center

• Promote Implementation of UDI

• Assure Safety

• Foster Device Innovation

• Patient Access

• Address Barriers to Quality
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T G U RPREET K A U R, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 73285 A ge nc yN o. A 076- 865- 536 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G urpr e e tK aur , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng her m ot i on t o reopen r e m ova lpr oc e e di ngs . W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f or 

# FI LED JU N 23 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 73285 2 ab u s e o f d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , T

ou f i gh iv. Mukasey , 538 F . 3d 9 8 8 , 9 9 2 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 8 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g K au r ’s s e c o n dm o tio n to re op en as t i m e- barr ed and n um ber- barr ed w here the succ es si ve m ot i on w as fi l ed o v e rth r e e y e ar s a f

te rth e B I A ’s f

in a l d e c is io n , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 2( c ) ( 2) , and K au rf a ile dto p r e s e n t s u f

f ic ie n t e v id e n c e o f

c h an g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s in I n d iato qu a lif yf o ran e x c e p tio n to th e tim e an dn u m b e rlim its , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 2( c ) ( 3) (i i ); s e e al

s o T ouf i ghi , 5 3 8 F .3 da t 9 9 6 - 9 7 ( u n d e r ly in g a d v e r s e c r e d ib ility det erm i nat i on re nd er ed evi dence of changed ci rc um st ance s i m m at er i al ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.