alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 74734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29320]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; Training and Career Development Application Review.
    Date: March 11, 2015.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 Medical 
Center Drive, Room 7W110, Rockville, MD 20850 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Robert E. Bird, Ph.D., Chief, Resources and 
Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National 
Cancer Institute 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 7W110, Bethesda, MD 
20892-9750, 240-276-6344, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#086a617a6c7a486569616426666160266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4e2c273c2a3c0e232f27226020272660292138">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/sep/sep.htm, where an 
agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 10, 2014.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-29320 Filed 12-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Inconnection with the report of Gaiam, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with theU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Jirka Rysavy, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)     The Report fully complies with therequirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

Date:  March 14, 2007
|        |   | /s/ Jirka Rysavy                                  |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Jirka Rysavy                                      |
|   |   | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |                                              |

 

----
**Exhibit 15.1**

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

The Board ofDirectors and Stockholders 

Beckman Coulter, Inc.: 

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Beckman Coulter, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009, and the related condensed consolidated statements ofearnings for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and cash flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. These condensed consolidated financial statements are the responsibility ofthe Company’s management. 

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an auditconducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not expresssuch an opinion. 

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidatedfinancial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. 

We have previouslyaudited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Beckman Coulter, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008, and the related consolidatedstatements of earnings, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our report dated February 23, 2009, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidatedfinancial statements. The audit report on the consolidated financial statements refers to changes in the Company’s method of accounting for defined benefit pension and other post retirement plans and quantifying errors in 2006 due to theadoption of new accounting pronouncements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidatedbalance sheet from which it has been derived. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Irvine, California 

November 5, 2009
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1687 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 6444 San Fernando Road in Glendale, California, as the ‘‘Paul Ignatius Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 1687 RFS

1 SECTION 1. PAUL IGNATIUS POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 6444 San Fernando Road in 

4 Glendale, California, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Paul Ignatius Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Paul Ignatius Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
### NUMBER 13
- 13
- 00 130
- CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ DAVID WOOD , A ppellant ,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 319 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## ORDER ABATING APPEAL
Before Justices Garza , Benavides , and Perkes

Order Per Curiam Appellant, David Wood , filed a notice of appeal from a conviction of assault. This
cause is before the Court on the State’s motion for abatement and remand. The State
indicates that the record fails to refle ct a properly filed affidavit of indigency and that appellant may not be entitled to an appointed attorney on appeal.2

If appellant is indigent, he has a right to appointment of appellate counsel. See
T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 1.051(d)(1) ( West Supp. 2010). Because the State has
indicated that appellant may not be indigent and the record fails to indicate whether appellant is indigent, we GRANT the State’s motion. Accordingly, we ABATE and REMAND this cause to the trial court

. Upon remand, the trial court is directed to: (1) immediately cause notice to be given and conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant is indigent; (2) determine whether appellant ’ s
court

- appointed attorney should remain as appellant's counsel ; (3 ) make and file appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law and cause them to be included in a clerk's record; ( 4 ) cause the hearing to be transcribed and included in a reporter's record; and ( 5 ) have these records forwarded to the Clerk of this Court within thirt y days from the date of this order. If the trial court requires additional time to comply, the trial court should so notify the Clerk of this Court.
It is so ordered.
PER CURIAM Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).
D elivered and filed the 17th day of March , 20 1 4

.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1688 

To provide an emergency cost-of-living increase for social security 

beneficiaries, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2023 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide an emergency cost-of-living increase for social 

security beneficiaries, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Cost 

5 of Living Increase Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1688 IH

1 SEC. 2. COMPUTATION OF COST-OF-LIVING INCREASES 

2 BASED ON CONSUMER PRICE INDEX FOR EL3 DERLY CONSUMERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 215(i)(1) of the Social Se5 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 415(i)(1)) is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(H) the term ‘Consumer Price Index’ means 

8 the Consumer Price Index for Elderly Consumers 

9 (CPI–E, as published by the Bureau of Labor Sta10 tistics of the Department of Labor).’’. 

11 (b) APPLICATION TO PRE-1979 LAW.— 

12 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 215(i)(1) of the So13 cial Security Act as in effect in December 1978, and 

14 as applied in certain cases under the provisions of 

15 such Act as in effect after December 1978, is 

16 amended by adding at the end the following new 

17 subparagraph: 

18 ‘‘(D) the term ‘Consumer Price Index’ means 

19 the Consumer Price Index for Elderly Consumers 

20 (CPI–E, as published by the Bureau of Labor Sta21 tistics of the Department of Labor).’’. 

22 (2) CONFORMING CHANGE.—Section 215(i)(4) 

23 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 415(i)(4)) is 

24 amended— 

25 (A) by striking ‘‘and by section 9001’’ and 

26 inserting ‘‘, section 9001’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1688 IH

1 (B) by inserting ‘‘and section 3 of the So2 cial Security Cost of Living Increase Act of 

3 2023,’’ after ‘‘1986,’’. 

4 (c) PUBLICATION OF CONSUMER PRICE INDEX FOR

5 ELDERLY CONSUMERS.—The Bureau of Labor Statistics 

6 of the Department of Labor shall prepare and publish the 

7 index authorized by section 191 of the Older Americans 

8 Amendments Act of 1987 (29 U.S.C. 2 note) for each cal9 endar month, beginning with the date of enactment of this 

10 Act, and such index shall be known as the ‘‘Consumer 

11 Price Index for Elderly Consumers’’. 

12 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 subsection (a) shall apply to determinations made with re14 spect to cost-of-living computation quarters (as defined in 

15 section 215(i)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

16 415(i)(1)(B))) ending on or after September 30, 2024. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
USGv6 Test Selection Tables* 

Addressing Architecture Requirements 

F7-Conformance: Addr Arch Requirements v1.3

Applicable Profile: NIST SP 500-267 A profile for IPv6 in the U.S. Government - Version 1.0, July 2008.

Configuration Option: None 

Test Specification Id: 

• [Addr] Address Architecture Conformance Test Specification, Version 2.5, February, 2020, [editor: UNH 

InterOperability Laboratory]. 

Reference: 

• [RFC 4193] R. Hinden, B. Haberman. "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses." RFC 4193, October 2005 

• [RFC 4291] R. Hinden, S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture," RFC 4291, February 2006 

• [RFC 4007] S. Deering, B. Haberman, T. Jinmei, E. Nordmark, B. Zill, "IPv6 Scoped Address 

Architecture," RFC 4007, March 2005 

• [RFC 3879] C. Huitema, B. Carpenter, "Deprecating Site Local Addresses." RFC 3879, September 2004 

• [RFC 3484] R. Draves, "Default Address Selection for Internet Protocol version 6 IPV6)," RFC 3484, 

February 2003

• [RFC 2526] D. Johnson, S. Deering, "Reserved IPv6 Subnet Anycast Addresses," RFC 2526, March 1999

Addressing Architecture Test Check List

Reference Test 

Specification Id Test Number Device Type

RFC 4007, 

4291 Addr Addr.1.1: IPv6 Scoped Address (A)(B)(C) Host/Router 

RFC 3484 Addr Addr.1.2: Default Source Address Selection (A)(C) Host/Router 

RFC 3484 Addr Addr.1.2: Default Source Address Selection (B) Host

RFC 3484 Addr Addr.1.3: Default Destination Address Selection (A) Host/Router 

RFC 3484 Addr Addr.1.3: Default Destination Address Selection (B) Host

RFC 3879 Addr Addr.1.5: Deprecating Site Local Addresses (A)(B) Host/Router 

RFC 3879 Addr Addr.2.2: Routing Deprecated Site Local Addresses Router 

RFC 4192 Addr Addr.2.3: IP Forwarding - Source and Destination Address 

(A)(B)(C)(D)(E)(F)(G)(H)(I)(J) Router

NOTE: The following tests are considered a O for the Address Architecture Requirements as per the USGv6-V1 

Profile. 
Unique Local “Optional”

Reference

Test 

Specification 

Id

Test Number Device 

Type

RFC 4193 Addr Addr.1.4: Unique Local IPv6 Address (A)(B) Host/Router 

RFC 4193 Addr Addr.2.1: Routing Unique Local Addresses Router

* The objective of this test selection sheet is to provide a reference for available test specifications that identifies 

tests applicable to the USGv6 Profile.
United States Department of Com

National Institute of Standards and Technolo

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For: 

Vermont 

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international system of units (SI), documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully 

completed training and proficiency tests, documented calibration intervals, submitted a quality management system, anddemonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate. The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope 

Mass Echelon III Volume Transfer, II 30 kg to 1 mg 200 gal to 5 gal

1000 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Weight Carts

7000 lb to 1000 lb

Volume Transfer, II LPG 100 gal to 25 galHydrometers (10 degrees to 0 degrees) Brix

___________Katrice LippNIST Office 

(45 degrees to 35 degrees) Baume Effective Date

(Rev.: September 2021)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DOD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The inventions listed below are those in which the United States Government as represented by the                               ( print page 74714)                            Secretary of the Navy has an ownership interest and are made available for licensing by the Department of the Navy.                    

Navy Case No. 100035: U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 14/535,384 FLOATING POINT MULTIPLY-ADD-SUBTRACT IMPLEMENTATION filed 11/7/2014// Navy Case No. 300005: U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 14/549,586 A DELAMINATION AND CRACK PREVENTION LAYER FOR STRUCTURAL SANDWICH PANEL filed 11/21/2014// Navy Case No. 300083: NUWC XP-1 POLYURETHANE// Navy Case No. 101048: U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 13/361,312 DYNAMIC ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE MATCHING DEVICE AND METHOD filed 7/27/2012//

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dr. Theresa A. Baus, Head, Technology Partnerships Office, Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division, Newport, 1176 Howell St., Newport, RI 02841-1703, telephone: 401-832-8728, email                         *Theresa.baus@navy.mil.*

(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.)

Dated: December 10, 2014.

N.A. Hagerty-Ford

Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register  Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2014-29411 Filed 12-15-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Amado ARRIAGA-ARROYO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-10594.

D.C. No. CR-00-00070-DWH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*568Submitted May 14, *2001*
      *1*
      *.*

Decided May 30, 2001.

Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4.

MEMORANDUM2

Amado Arriaga-Arroyo appeals the judgment of conviction and 30-month sentence following his guilty plea to a single count of being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Arriaga-Arroyo contends that in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court improperly imposed a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) because the government neither pled in the indictment nor established through the guilty plea that Arriaga-Arroyo had been deported subsequent to a prior conviction for an aggravated felony. He also contends that *Apprendi*renders inapplicable *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a sentencing factor and not a separate offense). These arguments are foreclosed by *United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda,*234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), *as amended*(Feb. 8, 2001), *cert. denied,*— U.S. —, 121 S.Ct. 1503, — L.Ed.2d — (2001) and by *United States v. Castillo Rivera,*244 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir.2001). Accordingly, the sentence is affirmed.

We remand for the limited purpose of directing the district court to amend the judgment to reflect a conviction under 8 U.S.C. 1326(a) only. *United States v. Herrera-Blanco,*232 F.3d 715 (9th Cir.2000) (sua sponte remanding to-the district court with directions to correct the judgment of conviction to exclude a reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2)).

AFFIRMED in part and REMANDED in part.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1722 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1722

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Grand Ronde Reservation Act 
Amendment of 2023''.

SEC. 2. GRAND RONDE RESERVATION ACT AMENDMENT.

    Section 1(d) of Public Law 100-425 (commonly known as the ``Grand 
Ronde Reservation Act''; 102 Stat. 1594; 108 Stat. 4566) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``lands within the State 
        of Oregon'' and inserting ``the 84 acres known as the Thompson 
        Strip'';
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``(2) Gaming prohibition.--Any real property obtained by 
        the Tribes as part of a land claim settlement approved by the 
        United States, including any real property purchased with funds 
        granted as part of any land claim settlement, shall not be 
        eligible, or used, for any class II gaming or class III gaming 
        under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) 
        (as those terms are defined in section 4 of that Act (25 U.S.C. 
        2703)).''.

SEC. 3. TREATY RIGHTS OF FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBES.

     Nothing in this Act, or an amendment made by this Act, shall be 
construed to enlarge, confirm, adjudicate, affect, or modify any treaty 
right of an Indian Tribe (as defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304)).

            Passed the House of Representatives November 8, 2023.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1722

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and for other purposes.
```