alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Annual Report of BF Acquisition Group
IV, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
April 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Colucci,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Dated: June 16, 2004

                   /s/ William Colucci
                   ----------------------------
                   William Colucci, President
                   BF Acquisition Group V, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Diversified Futures Fund II L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      10,332,845
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,463<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,704,544<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,704,544<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,676,535<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               860,813
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                815,722
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            815,722
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   815,722
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $34,463.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $1,337,236.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $516,842, accrued
management fees of $29,261 and incentive fees payable of $71,138.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $1,771,997,
net change in unrealized of $(412,113), and interest income of
$316,651.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIESOF THE COMPANY**

 

 

The following are wholly-owned subsidiariesof MOCON, Inc.:

 
| **Name of Entity**                                  | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Organization** |
|-----------------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------|
|                                                |       |                             |
| Microanalytics  Instrumentation Corp.               |       | Texas                            |
| Lab  Connections, Inc.                              |       | Minnesota                        |
| Baseline-MOCON,  Inc.                               |       | Colorado                         |
| Paul Lippke  Handels-GmbH Prozess- und Laborsysteme |       | Germany                          |

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70888-70889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28139]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary

[15XD0120AF: DT10110000: DST000000.54A00: 252R]


Request for Nominations To Serve on the Special Trustee Advisory 
Board

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Office of the Special Trustee for 
American Indians, Interior.

ACTION: Request for nominations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Special Trustee for American Indians requests nominations 
of candidates to serve on the Special Trustee Advisory Board (Advisory 
Board). The Advisory Board provides advice on all matters within the 
jurisdiction of the Special Trustee and consists of nine members.

DATES: Submit nominations by December 29, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit nominations to Office of the Special Trustee for 
American Indians, Attn: Lee Frazier, Department of the Interior, 1849 C 
Street NW., Room 3253, Washington, DC 20240.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lee Frazier, Office of the Special 
Trustee for American Indians, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#59353c3c063f2b3823303c2b19362a2d773d3630773e362f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f79b9292a89185968d9e9285b7988483d993989ed9909881">[email protected]</span></a>, (202) 208-7587.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 4046, the Special 
Trustee for American Indians requests nominations of candidates to 
serve on the Special Trustee Advisory Board.
    The Advisory Board, which provides advice on all matters within the 
jurisdiction of the Special Trustee, consists of nine members with the 
following qualifications:
    (1) Five members represent trust fund account holders, including 
both tribal and Individual Indian Money accounts;
    (2) Two members must have practical experience in trust fund and 
financial management;

[[Page 70889]]

    (3) One member must have practical experience in fiduciary 
investment management; and
    (4) One member, from academia, must have knowledge of general 
management of large organizations.
    Board members receive no compensation and serve a term of two 
years. Nominations should include a resume or other documents 
demonstrating the nominee's qualifications for at least one of the 
board member categories as described in this notice.
    The Advisory Board is not subject to the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (FACA).

Vincent G. Logan,
Special Trustee for American Indians.
[FR Doc. 2014-28139 Filed 11-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-2W-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
U. S. Department of Education

CYBERSECURITY & 

PRIVACY AWARENESS 

VIRTUAL ESCAPE ROOM
• In FY2022 the Department released a gamified Cyber Security and Privacy Awareness 

course which features a simulated escape room. 

• This course provides essential information on user responsibilities for complying with 

Department policies, guidance, procedures, and best practices designed to reduce these 

risks. 

New Virtual Escape Room Course

2

• Compliance with Web Content Accessibility 

Guidelines (WCAG) ensures that it is 

accessible to all learners.

• The escape room gamification format is a 

fun way to increase user awareness of 

potential threats, vulnerabilities, and risks 

to the security and privacy of the 

Department's information and information 

systems. 
Benefits of Gamification

• Increases learner engagement by holding attention and increasing motivation. 

• Improves knowledge absorption and retention and enhances the overall learning 

experience as it appeals to multiple learning styles. 

• Makes eLearning fun and interactive. If learners are having fun and are getting 

excited about learning, they are more likely to acquire and retain information. 

• Allows for real world application of knowledge. 
• After entering the building lobby, you find 

that the evil Dr. Mal has installed malware 

on the smart building’s security system 

and to your dismay, you are now locked 

in. The only way out is to locate the cipher 

code to the exit door. Unfortunately, Dr. 

Mal has broken the code up into pieces 

and hidden a piece in each office 

throughout the building. 

• You must use your cyber security and 

privacy knowledge, as well as your wits 

and cunning, to work your way through 

each office. Solve the clues and interact 

with cyber security and privacy scenarios 

to receive a piece of the cipher code. 

Collect all the pieces and assemble the 

code to escape the building and complete 

the course. 

Training Concept
• Learners who already have a 

strong understanding of the 

content may opt to complete 

the course using the test-out 

feature. This challenging 

assessment allows those 

with competency in the 

subject to easily 

demonstrate it, thus saving 

them time.

• Those that prefer to 

complete the full course or 

who did not successfully 

pass the test-out proceed to 

the escape room.

Test-Out Option
Solve the Clues

Learners solve clues that grant them access to real world cyber scenarios.
Use Your Cyber Knowledge

Branching scenarios and hands-on activities enable users to actively engage with the 

content. 
Solving Clues Unlocks Each Room

8

Once all clues in a room are solved, a key is revealed, and that room unlocks. 
Enter the Override Code to Escape

Once all rooms are unlocked, the 

learner can use the keys they found to 

reveal the code that unlocks the 

building thus completing the training. 
What did the Learners Think?
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



I, Robert Oberosler, Chief Executive Officer certify that:



I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Theater Xtreme Entertainment Group, Inc.;



1.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

2.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

3.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: November 6, 2008



By:  /s/ Robert Oberosler

Robert Oberosler,

Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

FRANK LEE BACK, : 

Petitioner, : 

v. : CIVIL ACTION 05-0711-WS-M

JERRY FERRELL, : 

Respondent. :

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT be entered in favor of

Respondent Jerry Ferrell and against Petitioner Frank Lee Back.

DONE and ORDERED this 7th day of April, 2006.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00711-WS-M Document 14 Filed 04/07/06 Page 1 of 1
l)isniiss and Opinion Filed Mardi 1, 2013.

In The

Q!øitrt ni Atipit1s

Fiftt Iitrirt uf rxa itt Ia11a

No. 05-12-01738-CR

.IAY SANDON COOPER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-2-1391

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Moseley, O’Neill, and Lewis

Opinion by Justice Lewis

Jay Sandon Cooper stands charged by infonnation with the offense of driving while

intoxicated. Appellant filed an affidavit of indigence on February 3, 2012, which was denied on

March 22, 2012. Thereafter, appellant represented himself in the trial court. On November 21,

2012, appellant filed “Defendant’s Objections; Motion for Ruling on Defendant’s Application

for Indigency; and In the Event that the Court Refuses to Rule, Defendant’s Objection to the

Refusal to Rule.” The trial judge denied this motion by order dated November 26, 2012. On

December 6, 2012, appellant filed his notice of appeal. Because there is not a final judgment, we

sent the parties a letter directing them to file letter briefs addressing our jurisdiction over the

appeal. Despite being given an extension of time to file his letter brief, appellant did not

respond. We conclude we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.
The right to appeal in a criminal case is a statutorily created right. See McKinnev i. State.

207 S.W,3d 366, 374 (Tex, Crim, App. 2004): Griffin v. State, 145 S.W3d 645, 646 (Tex. Crim,

App. 2004), See also FEX. CoDi CRIM. P. ANN. art. 34.02 (West 2006) (providing right of

appeal for defendant); TEx. R. App. P. 25,2(a)(2) (rules for appeal by defendant). As a general

rule, appellate courts may consider appeals by criminal defendants only after conviction, Wright

v. State. 969 S,W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.—DalIas 1998, no pet.) (identifying types of appealable

interlocutory orders). Intermediate appellate courts have no jurisdiction to review interlocutory

orders absent express authority. Ex porte Apolinar, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App.

1991); Wright, 969 S.W.2d at 598.

The interlocutory order denying appellant’s motion related to his affidavit of indigence

and the denial of court-appointed counsel is not a judgment of conviction nor does it fall within

the categories of appealable interlocutory orders. Therefore, we have no jurisdiction over this

appeal.

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

/ 4/ / ;I

/,1 j iL

DAVID LEWIS

JUSTICE

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. App. P.47

121738F.U05
.FiftIi itrirt uf rxa at 1a11a

JUDGMENT

JAY SANDON COOPER, Appellant

No. 05-124)1738-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

No. 2. Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-2-1391.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis,

Justices Moseley and O’Neill participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of

jurisdiction,

Judgment entered this ll day of March. 2013.

] ‘/L

OAVID LEWIS

JUSTICE

Qløurt uf Aieab
| EXHIBIT      32.1 |
|-------------------|

| Chief      Executive Officer Certification |
|--------------------------------------------|

| Pursuant      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section    906 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| of      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|----------------------------------------|

| 1.   | The      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  October 30,      2008 | /s/ Joseph D.      Reid                                                                                   Joseph      D. ReidChief      Executive Officer |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

HENRY COOPER :

(AIS # 256656),

:

Plaintiff, 

:

vs. CIVIL ACTION 08-00321-CG-C

:

WARDEN JERRY FERRELL, et al.,

:

Defendants.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is

ORDERED that Judgment be entered in favor of the Defendants and that Plaintiff’s Complaint

be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED this 4th day of February, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-00321-CG-C Document 20 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1

                                                             EXHIBIT 21

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

Mueller International Sales Corporation, a Foreign Sales Corporation, 
was organized December 18, 1984, and incorporated under the laws of the 
Virgin Islands of the United States, and became active in 1985.  This 
is a wholly owned subsidiary and its accounts have been included in the 
consolidated financial statements filed herein.

Mueller Transportation, Inc., a Missouri Corporation, was incorporated 
on October 15, 1996.  This is a wholly owned subsidiary that began 
operations effective January 1, 1997.  Its accounts have been included 
in the consolidated financial statements filed herein.

                                   56
EX-4.3



 Exhibit 4.3 

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF COEUR MINING, INC. 

Coeur Mining, Inc. (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware, hereby certifies as follows: 
  

	1.	This Certificate of Amendment (the “Certificate of Amendment”) amends the provisions of the Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation that was filed with the Secretary of State on May 15,
2013 and became effective on May 16, 2013 (the “Certificate of Incorporation”). 

  

	2.	Section 4.1 of Article IV of the Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 


Section 4.1 Authorized Stock. The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 310,000,000
shares, of which 300,000,000 shares shall be designated as Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), and 10,000,000 shares shall be designated as Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (the “Preferred
Stock”). 
  

	3.	This amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 


 

	4.	All other provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation shall remain in full force and effect. 

 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, Coeur Mining, Inc. has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer on this 12th day of May, 2015. 
  

			
	COEUR MINING, INC.
		
	By	 	/s/ Casey M. Nault
	 Name: Casey M. Nault
 Title: Senior
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary