Supreme Court of Florida

____________

No. SC17-155

____________

IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL 

ADMINISTRATION — 2017 REGULAR-CYCLE REPORT.

[September 7, 2017]

PER CURIAM.

We have for consideration The Florida Bar’s Rules of Judicial 

Administration Committee’s (RJA Committee) regular-cycle report of proposed 

rule amendments. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.140(b)(4). We have jurisdiction1and 

adopt many of the unopposed amendments as proposed. We modify several of the 

proposals and adopt, on our own motion, additional amendments to further clarify 

and delineate the current procedures for amending court rules. However, we

decline to adopt the opposed amendments that would expand the RJA Committee’s 

responsibilities as the “rules coordinating committee.”

 

1. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.
- 2 -

 

BACKGROUND

The RJA Committee proposes amendments to Florida Rules of Judicial 

Administration 2.140 (Amending Rules of Court); 2.510 (Foreign Attorneys); and 

2.516 (Service of Pleadings and Documents). The RJA Committee published the 

proposals for comment before filing them with the Court. The RJA Committee 

received comments from the Appellate Court Rules Committee (ACR Committee), 

the Family Law Rules Committee (FLR Committee), and the Small Claims Rules 

Committee (SCR Committee) objecting to the amendments to rule 2.140(a)(6) that 

(1) would recognize the RJA Committee as the central rules coordinating 

committee and reviewer of rules proposals to determine if a proposal is of general 

or common application and to make recommendations to resolve conflicts, 

inconsistencies, and redundancy between a proposal and existing or other proposed

rules, and (2) would allow the RJA Committee to issue a formal response to the

proposals to be included in the rule submissions to the Board of Governors of The 

Florida Bar and to this Court. After considering the comments, the RJA

Committee did not make any revisions to its proposals. The Board of Governors 

approved all the proposed rule amendments. 

After the RJA Committee filed its report, the Court published the proposed 

amendments for comment. The ACR Committee, the Criminal Procedure Rules 
- 3 -

Committee (CPR Committee), the SCR Committee, and The Florida Bar’s 

Criminal Law Section filed comments opposing the proposed amendments to rule 

2.140(a)(6). The FLR Committee, the Juvenile Court Rules Committee (JCR

Committee), and the Probate Rules Committee (PR Committee) filed a joint 

comment also opposing those amendments. The comments filed with this Court 

raise the same objections to the proposed amendments as were raised in the 

comments submitted to the RJA Committee. The RJA Committee responded to the 

comments submitted to it in its report and filed a response to the comments filed 

with the Court. 

AMENDMENTS

After considering the RJA Committee’s proposals, the comments submitted 

to the RJA Committee and filed with the Court, and the RJA Committee’s

responses to the comments, we decline to adopt the opposed amendments to rule 

2.140(a)(6). However, we adopt the amendments to rules 2.510 (Foreign 

Attorneys), and 2.516 (Service of Pleadings and Documents), and many of the

noncontroversial amendments to rule 2.140 (Amending Rules of Court).

2

 We 

modify several of the proposed amendments to rule 2.140 and, on our own motion, 

 

2. Minor editorial and technical amendments also are made throughout rule 

2.140. As explained later in this opinion, we have modified a proposed “editorial” 

amendment to rule 2.510.
- 4 -

make additional changes to rule 2.140 in order to more fully delineate the current 

procedures for amending court rules. 

We commend the RJA Committee for its willingness, as our “rules 

coordinating committee,” to take on more responsibilities to ensure the quality of 

the rules of court. We also greatly appreciate that committee’s efforts to improve 

communication among the Bar’s rules committees and to suggest procedures 

designed to improve the rule coordination process. However, after considering the

proposed amendments to rule 2.140(a)(6) and the comments opposing those 

amendments and hearing oral argument, we decline to adopt amendments that 

would require the RJA Committee to have a more involved role in coordinating 

rule proposals. We agree with the commenters that expanding the RJA 

Committee’s rule coordination responsibilities as proposed could result in undue 

delay in the rule-making process and unnecessarily overburden the RJA 

Committee. 

Currently under rule 2.140(a)(6), each rules committee provides the RJA

Committee with a copy of all proposed rules changes, and the RJA Committee

refers proposed rules changes to any rules committees it determines may be 

affected by the change. Since this Court recognized the RJA Committee as the 

rules coordinating committee, that committee has been responsible for identifying 

rules proposals that might affect other existing or proposed rules and referring 
- 5 -

those proposals to the appropriate rules committees. See Fla. Bar re Rules of 

Judicial Admin., 458 So. 2d 1110, 1110-11 (Fla. 1984) (adopting rule 2.130(b)(5) 

effective January 1, 1985 (renumbered 2.140(a)(6)); Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 

2.140(a)(6). The Court has explained that this rule coordination function was 

created “to identify how proposed changes in one set of rules inter-relate with 

existing and proposed rules in other areas” and to provide “a means for 

determining the potential impact of rules changes on rules in other areas.” Fla. Bar 

re Rules of Judicial Admin., 458 So. 2d at 1110-11. Currently, the affected 

committees, whose members have expertise in their respective practice areas, are 

responsible for reviewing the referred rule change and working with the proposing 

committee to determine what action, if any, should be taken to avoid conflicts and 

other potential issues with the proposal. While this coordination scheme may not

be perfect, it allocates rule coordination responsibilities to the committee best 

suited to each task. The RJA Committee, with its diverse membership and liaison 

subcommittee, is best suited to review all proposed rules changes to identify 

changes that might impact other rules or pending proposals; and the several 

substantive rules committees are best equipped to work together to resolve

identified issues with rules proposals.

According to the RJA Committee’s report and response to the comments, 

that committee’s liaison subcommittee currently reviews all rules proposals to 
- 6 -

determine how they relate to other rules and whether a proposal should be referred 

to any potentially affected rules committees for consideration. The liaison 

subcommittee consists of members from each of the other rules committees who

are appointed to serve as liaisons between their respective committees and the RJA 

Committee. As amended, subdivision (a)(4) of rule 2.140 will specifically require

the liaison committee members appointed to the RJA Committee by the chairs of 

their respective rules committee to “facilitate and implement routine periodic 

reporting by and to the Rules of Judicial Administration Committee on the 

development and progress of rule proposals under consideration and their potential 

impact on other existing or proposed rules.” This ongoing active communication 

between the RJA Committee and the other rules committees about the status of 

rules proposals will enhance the RJA Committee’s rule coordination efforts. 

While we decline to adopt the proposed amendments that would expand the RJA 

Committee’s rule coordination responsibilities, there is nothing to preclude the 

RJA Committee from including in its referral to an affected rules committee or 

providing in a comment submitted to a proposing committee, under rule 

2.140(b)(2) or new rule 2.140(e)(2), any information, insights, or suggestions the 

RJA Committee believes might be helpful to those committees in considering a 

proposed rule change. In this way, the RJA Committee can take a more active role 
- 7 -

in resolving potential issues with rule proposals that will not result in undue delay 

or otherwise detrimentally affect the rule-making process. 

The proposed amendments to rule 2.140 we do adopt are intended to clarify, 

improve, and streamline the rule-making process. We adopt the amendments to 

subdivision (a)(2) of rule 2.140, as proposed, to clarify that proposals to amend 

court rules may be submitted to the Clerk of this Court for referral to the 

appropriate rules committee, as currently provided, or may be submitted directly to 

the appropriate rules committee chair or Bar staff liaison to the rules committee. 

We amend subdivision (a)(4) of rule 2.140, as proposed, to require that members 

of the RJA Committee have “previous rules committee experience or substantial 

experience in the administration of the Florida court system.” The requirement 

that the chairs of each rules committee appoint one of the committee’s members to 

“serve as a regular member of the Rules of Judicial Administration Committee” is 

moved from current subdivision (a)(6) to subdivision (a)(4). And, as noted above,

proposed language is added that requires the committee liaisons to “facilitate and 

implement routine periodic reporting by and to the Rules of Judicial 

Administration Committee on the development and progress of rule proposals 

under consideration and their potential impact on other existing or proposed rules.” 

We further amend subdivision (a)(4), as proposed, to clarify that committee liaison 

members serve at the pleasure of their respective committee chair and to clarify 
- 8 -

that the president-elect of the Board of Governors appoints sitting members of each 

rules committee to serve as chairs and vice chairs. 

We also amend subdivision (a)(5) of rule 2.140, as proposed, to ensure that

each rules committee shares rule amendment information with other committees in 

a timely manner by adding a requirement that each committee “promptly and 

timely” furnish to the other rules committees “all meeting agendas and all minutes 

or other record of action taken.” This change furthers the RJA Committee’s goal 

of improving communication between the rules committees and allows other rules 

committees, including the RJA Committee, to identify and communicate about 

potential issues with rule changes even before the proposals are approved and

formally submitted to the RJA Committee under subdivision (a)(6).

We adopt many of the proposed amendments to the other subdivisions of 

rule 2.140 either as proposed or with some modifications. On our own motion, we 

also make a number of additional changes to the rule that are consistent with

current procedures for amending court rules. First, we modify the proposed new 

title to subdivision (b) (Schedule for Rules Proposals) to read “Schedule for 

Regular-Cycle Rules Proposals.” We change, as proposed, the date a committee 

must report revisions to its regular-cycle proposals to the Board of Governors from 

October 15 to October 31. We make several additional changes to subdivision (b) 

that are consistent with current procedures for regular-cycle rules changes, such as 
- 9 -

recognizing that some proposals are considered without oral argument and that 

regular-cycle rules cases that are scheduled for oral argument are generally

scheduled for June. We make the proposed technical changes to subdivision (d)

(Emergency Amendments by Court) of rule 2.140 and also make a number of 

additional changes to more fully delineate the current procedures for amendments 

adopted on the Court’s own motion. 

The RJA Committee proposes extensive amendments to subdivision (e) 

(Emergency Recommendations by Committee) of rule 2.140, including changing

the subdivision’s title and adding new subdivisions (e)(1) and (e)(2). We adopt

some of the committee’s changes as proposed, and modify some of the proposals, 

including the suggested subdivision titles. We retitle subdivision (e) “Out-ofCycle Committee Proposals” and title new subdivisions (e)(1) and (e)(2) 

“Emergency Proposals and Proposals in Response to Legislative Changes” and 

“Non-Emergency Out-of-Cycle Proposals,” respectively. On our own motion, we 

make additional changes to this subdivision in order to make this subdivision 

consistent with current procedures for out-of-cycle rule proposals and to clarify 

that the rules committees should use their “fast-track procedures” for rule 

amendments needed due to changes in legislation. 

We make the proposed technical changes to subdivision (f) (Request by 

Court). On our own motion, we make a number of changes to streamline this 
- 10 -

subdivision and make it consistent with the current procedures for committee 

recommendations submitted in response to a request by the Court. We delete

much of the existing language in subdivision (f) and add new subdivisions (f)(1) 

(Recommended Rule Changes) and (f)(2) (No Action Recommendations). New 

subdivision (f)(1) recognizes that rule changes recommended in response to a 

request by the Court are currently submitted to the Court in either regular or outof-cycle reports and the procedures for regular and out-of-cycle proposals 

generally are followed. New subdivision (f)(2) delineates the current procedure for 

committee recommendations that no rule change is warranted and requires such

recommendations to be submitted to the Court in a “no action report” rather than in 

a report proposing rule changes under other subdivisions of rule 2.140. This new 

subdivision also codifies the Court’s current practice of having the Clerk of this 

Court provide notification of the Court’s action on the committee’s

recommendation. These procedures promote the Court’s timely consideration of 

“no action” recommendations and ensure their efficient processing. We also make

the proposed technical amendments to subdivision (g) (Amendments to the Rules 

of Judicial Administration) and make several additional technical changes to that 

subdivision that are consistent with technical changes being made to other 

subdivisions of rule 2.140. 
- 11 -

We amend 2.510(a) (Foreign Attorneys; Eligibility), as proposed, to remove 

the pro hac vice appearance limitation for federally authorized state court 

appearances by providing that the rule “shall not affect the eligibility of a foreign 

attorney to appear in a Florida court when authorized by federal law.” We have 

modified the proposed editorial change in item 10 of the “Verified Motion for 

Admission to Appear Pro Hac Vice” at the end of rule 2.510 that would replace the 

reference to disciplinary resignation with a reference to disciplinary revocation. 

As modified, the amendment to item 10 requires the movant to represent that he or 

she “is not a disbarred member of The Florida Bar nor has Movant received a 

disciplinary resignation or disciplinary revocation from The Florida Bar.” This 

change recognizes that while a disciplinary revocation has replaced a disciplinary 

resignation, and since 2006, attorneys have not been able to agree to a disciplinary 

resignation, there are still former members of The Florida Bar who were granted 

disciplinary resignations. See In re Amends. to Rules Regulating Fla. Bar, 916 So. 

2d 655, 656 (Fla. 2005) (deleting rule 3-7.12 (Disciplinary Resignation from the 

Florida Bar) from the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar effective January 1, 2006); 

In re Amends. to Rules Regulating Fla. Bar (Biannual Report), 101 So. 3d 807, 

807-808 (Fla. 2012) (adding rule 3-7.12 (Disciplinary Revocation of Admission to 

the Florida Bar) to the Bar Rules).
- 12 -

Finally, we adopt the proposed clarifying and technical amendments to rule

2.516 (Service of Pleadings and Documents). Subdivision (b)(1)(E)(i) (Format of 

E-mail for Service) is amended to require the “case style” be included in the 

subject line in a service e-mail. The amendment to subdivision (b)(2) (Service by 

Other Means) provides that service in that situation must be made by “noting the 

non-service in the certificate of service, and stating in the certificate of service that 

a copy of the served document may be obtained, on request, from the clerk of the 

court or from the party serving the document.” According to the report, this

amendment is intended to avoid the failure of service in situations when a pro se 

litigant has not designated an e-mail address and no physical address is known. 

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, we amend the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration as 

reflected in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by 

underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The amendments 

shall become effective January 1, 2018, at 12:01 a.m. Because the amendments to 

rule 2.140 that are adopted on the Court’s own motion have not been published for 

comment, interested persons shall have sixty days from the date of this opinion in 

which to comment on those amendments.

3

 

 

3. All comments must be filed with the Court on or before November 6, 

2017, with a certificate of service verifying that a copy has been served on the 

Chair of the RJA Committee, Judson Lee Cohen, 14125 N.W. 80th Avenue Suite 
- 13 -

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, 

and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE 

EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.

Original Proceeding – Florida Rules of Judicial Administration

Judson Lee Cohen, Chair, Rules of Judicial Administration Committee, Miami 

Lakes, Florida, Judge Steven Scott Stephens, Past Chair, Rules of Judicial 

Administration Committee, Tampa, Florida; and John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive 

Director, and Krys Godwin, Attorney Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, 

Florida,

for Petitioner

 

400, Miami Lakes, Florida 33016-2350, jcohen@weinsteincohen.com, and on the 

Bar Staff Liaison to the Committee, Krys Godwin, 651 E. Jefferson Street, 

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2300, kgodwin@flabar.org, as well as a separate 

request for oral argument if the person filing the comment wishes to participate in 

oral argument, which may be scheduled in this case. The Committee Chair has 

until November 27, 2017, to file a response to any comments filed with the Court. 

If filed by an attorney in good standing with The Florida Bar, the comment must be 

electronically filed via the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal (Portal) in accordance 

with In re Electronic Filing in the Supreme Court of Florida via the Florida Courts 

E-Filing Portal, Fla. Admin. Order No. AOSC13-7 (Feb. 18, 2013). If filed by a 

nonlawyer or a lawyer not licensed to practice in Florida, the comment may be, but 

is not required to be, filed via the Portal. Comments filed via the Portal must be 

submitted in Microsoft Word 97 or higher. See In re Electronic Filing in the 

Florida Supreme Court, Fla. Admin. Order No. AOSC17-27 (May 9, 2017). Any 

person unable to submit a comment electronically must mail or hand-deliver the 

originally signed comment to the Florida Supreme Court, Office of the Clerk, 500 

South Duval Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1927; no additional copies are 

required or will be accepted.
- 14 -

Robert Joseph Merlin, Chair, Family Law Rules Committee, Coral Gables, Florida, 

Judge Laurel Moore Lee, Past Chair, and Caroline Black Sikorske, Member, 

Family Law Rules Committee, Tampa, Florida; Jonathan Adam Galler, Chair, 

Florida Probate Rules Committee, Boca Raton, Florida, and Michael Travis Hayes 

and Jon Scuderi, Past Co-Chairs, Florida Probate Rules Committee, Naples, 

Florida; Kara Ann Fenlon, Chair, Juvenile Court Rules Committee, Tallahassee, 

Florida, and Ward L. Metzger, Past Chair, Juvenile Court Rules Committee, 

Jacksonville, Florida; Marty McDonnell, Chair, Criminal Law Section of the 

Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida, and Joel M. Silvershein, Past Chair, Criminal 

Law Section of The Florida Bar, Fort Lauderdale, Florida; Landis Vernon Curry 

III, Chair, and Kristin A. Norse, Past Chair, Appellate Court Rules Committee, 

Tampa, Florida, and Thomas D. Hall, Vice Chair, Appellate Court Rules 

Committee, Tallahassee, Florida; Michael Thiel Debski, Chair, Small Claims Rules 

Committee, Jacksonville, Florida, and Alison Verges Walters, Past Chair, Small 

Claims Rules Committee, Tampa, Florida; Jon Berkley Morgan, Chair, Criminal 

Procedure Rules Committee, Kissimmee, Florida, and H. Scott Fingerhut, Past 

Chair, Criminal Procedure Rules Committee, Coral Gables, Florida; and Mikalla 

Andies Davis and Heather Savage Telfer, Attorney Liaisons, The Florida Bar, 

Tallahassee, Florida,

Responding with Comments
- 15 -

APPENDIX

RULE 2.140. AMENDING RULES OF COURT

(a) Amendments Generally. The following procedure shall be followed 

for consideration of rule amendments generally other than those adopted under 

subdivisions (d), (e), (f), and (g):

(1) [No Change]

(2) Proposals shall be submitted to the clerk of the supreme court, 

the committee chair(s) of a Florida Bar committee listed in subdivision (a)(3), or 

the Bar staff liaison of The Florida Bar in writing and shall include a general 

description of the proposed rule change or a specified proposed change in content. 

The clerk of the supreme court shall refer proposals to the appropriate committee 

under subdivision (a)(3).

(3) [No Change]

(4) Each committee shall be composed of attorneys and judges with 

extensive experience and training in the committee’s area of practice of the 

committee calling for regular, frequent use of the rulesconcentration. Members of 

the Rules of Judicial Administration Committee shall also have previous rules 

committee experience or substantial experience in the administration of the Florida 

court system. The chair of each rules committee shall appoint one of its members 

to the Rules of Judicial Administration Committee to serve as a regular member of 

the Rules of Judicial Administration Committee to facilitate and implement routine 

periodic reporting by and to the Rules of Judicial Administration Committee on the 

development and progress of rule proposals under consideration and their potential 

impact on other existing or proposed rules. The members of theeach rules

committee shall serve for 3-year staggered terms, except members appointed by a 

rules committee chair to the Rules of Judicial Administration Committee who shall 

serve at the pleasure of the respective rules committee chairs. The president-elect

of The Florida Bar shall appoint sitting members of each rules committee to serve 

as the chair(s) and vice chair(s) of each committeefor each successive year.

(5) The committees shall consider and vote on each proposal. The 

rules committees may originate proposals and are charged with the duty ofshall

regularly review and reevaluation ofreevaluate the rules to advance orderly and 

inexpensive procedures infor the administration of justice. The committees shall 
- 16 -

consider and vote on each proposal. The rules committees may accept or reject 

proposed amendments or may amend proposals. The rules committees shall keep 

minutes of their activities, which minutes shall reflect the action taken on each 

proposalprepare meeting agendas and minutes reflecting the status of rules 

proposals under consideration and actions taken. Copies of the minutes shall be 

furnished to the clerk of the supreme court, to the board of governors of The 

Florida Bar, and to the proponent of any proposal considered at the meeting. Each 

rules committee shall furnish promptly and timely to every other rules committee 

all meeting agendas and all minutes or other record of action taken.

(6) The Rules of Judicial Administration Committee shall also

serve as athe central rules coordinating committee. Each rules committee shall 

have at least 1 of its members appointed to the Rules of Judicial Administration 

Committee to serve as liaison. All committees shall provide a copy of any 

proposed rules changes to the Rules of Judicial Administration Committee within 

30 days of a committee’s affirmative vote to recommend the proposed change to 

the supreme court. The Rules of Judicial Administration Committee shall then 

refer all proposed rules changes to those rules committees that might be affected by 

the proposed change.

(7) [No Change]

(b) Schedule for Regular-Cycle Rules Proposals. 

(1) [No Change] 

(2) No later than June 15 of the year prior to each reporting year or 

such other date as the board of governors of The Florida Bar may set, each 

reporting committee shall submit all proposed rule changes to the board of 

governors with the committee’s final numerical voting record on each proposal. 

Contemporaneously with reporting proposed rule changes to the board of 

governors, each committee report shall be furnished to the Speaker of the Florida 

House of Representatives, the President of the Florida Senate, and the chairs of the 

House and Senate committees as designated by the Speaker and the President, and 

published on the Internet website of The Florida Bar, and in the Florida Bar 

Journal or The Florida Bar NewsNews. Any person desiring to comment upon 

proposed rule changes shall submit written comments to the appropriate committee 

chair(s) no later than August 1 of the year prior to each reporting year. Each 

committee shall consider any comments submitted and thereafter report to the 

board of governors, no later than October 1531 of the year prior to each reporting 
- 17 -

year, any revisions to the proposed rule changes. Contemporaneously with 

reporting any revisions to the board of governors, each committee’s revised 

proposed rule changes shall be furnished to the Speaker of the Florida House of 

Representatives, the President of the Florida Senate, and the chairs of the House 

and Senate committees as designated by the Speaker and the President, and 

published on the Internet website of The Florida Bar, and in the Florida Bar 

Journal orThe Florida Bar NewsNews. Any person desiring to comment thereafter 

shall submit written comments to the supreme court in accordance with subdivision 

(b)(6).

(3) [No Change] 

(4) No later than February 1 of each reporting year, each committee 

and the executive director of The Florida Bar shall file a report of its proposed rule 

changes with the supreme court. Each committee may amend its recommendations 

to coincide with the recommendations of the board of governors or may decline to 

do so or may amend its recommendations in another manner. Any such 

amendments shall also be reported to the supreme court. The report and proposed 

rule changes must conform to the Guidelines for Rules Submissions approved by 

administrative order and posted on the Internet websites of the supreme court and 

The Florida Bar. Consistent with the requirements that are fully set forth in the 

Guidelines, the report shall include:

(A) a list of the proposed changes, together with a detailed 

explanation of each proposal that includes a narrative description of how each 

amendment changes the language of the rule and a thorough discussion of the 

reason for each change;

(B) the final numerical voting record of the proposals in the 

committee;

(C) the name and address of the proponent of each change, if 

other than a member of the rules committee;

(D) a report of the action taken by the committee on 

comments submitted in accordance with subdivision (b)(2);

(E) a report of the action and voting record of the board of 

governors;
- 18 -

(F) any dissenting views of the committee and, if available, 

of the board; and

(G) an appendix containing all comments submitted to the 

committee, all relevant background documents, the proposed amendments in 

legislative format, and a two-column chart setting forth the proposed changes in 

legislative format in the firstleft column and a brief summary of the explanation of 

each change given in the report in the secondright column.

The report and the proposed rule changes shall be filed with the supreme 

court, in legislative format, both on paper and in an electronic format approved by 

the supreme court.

(5) If oral argument is deemed necessary, the supreme court shall 

establish a date duringin the month of May or June of each reporting year for oral 

argument on the proposals. Notice of the hearingoral argument on the proposals 

and a copy of the proposals shall be furnished to the affected committee chair(s)

and vice chair(s), the executive director and staff liaison of The Florida Bar, all 

members of the Judicial Management Council, the clerk and chief judge of each 

district court of appeal, the clerk and chief judge of each judicial circuit, the 

Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, the President of the Florida 

Senate, the chairs of the House and Senate committees as designated by the 

Speaker and the President, and any person who has asked in writing filed with the 

clerk of the supreme court for a copy of the notice. The clerk may provide the 

notice electronically. If the committee modifies its recommendations after 

considering comments submitted in accordance with subdivision (b)(2), tThe

recommendations or a resume of them shall be published on the Internet websites 

of the supreme court and The Florida Bar and in the Florida Bar Journal or The 

Florida Bar NewsNews before the hearingoral argument or consideration of the 

proposals without oral argument. Notice of the hearingoral argument, if scheduled,

shall also be published on the Internet websites of the supreme court and The 

Florida Bar and in the Florida Bar Journal or Florida Bar News.

(6) Before the date of oral argumentWithin the time allowed for 

comments set by the supreme court, any person may file comments concerning the 

proposals. All comments and other submissions by interested persons shall be filed 

with the clerk of the supreme court and served on the chair(s) of the appropriate 

rules committee, the Bar staff liaison, and on the proponent of the rule change if 

other than a member of the rules committee. The chair(s) of the rules committee 

and the executive director of The Florida Bar shall file a response to all comments 
- 19 -

within the time period set by the court. All comments and other submissions 

regarding the rule change proposals, in addition to being filed with the supreme 

court in paper format, shall also be filed in an approved electronic format approved 

bywith the supreme court. Prior to the date of oral argument and aAs soon as 

practicable after the date of filing, the clerk of the supreme court shall publish on 

the Internet websites of the supreme court and The Florida Bar all comments and 

the responses of the chair(s) of the rules committee that have been filed concerning 

the rule change proposals. All requests or submissions by a rules committee made 

in connection with a pending rule change proposal shall be filed with the clerk of 

the supreme court and thereafter published by the clerk of the supreme court on the 

Internet websites of the supreme court and The Florida Bar.

(7) Orders of the supreme court on saidOpinions adopting the

proposals should be adoptedissued in sufficient time for the rule changes to take 

effect on January 1 of the year following the reporting year. The supreme court 

may permit motions for rehearing to be filed on behalf of any person who filed a 

comment, The Florida Bar, any bar association, and the affected committee.

(c) Rejected Proposals. If a committee rejects a proposal, the proponent 

may submit the proposed rule to the board of governors and shall notify the 

chair(s) and vice chair(s) of the affected committee of the submission of the 

proposed rule to the board of governors. Minority reports of committees are 

allowed and may be submitted to both the board of governors and the supreme 

court.

(d) Emergency Amendments by Court. The supreme court, with or 

without notice, may change court rules at any time if an emergency exists that does 

not permit reference to the appropriate committee of The Florida Bar for 

recommendations. The rule changes must conform to the Guidelines for Rules 

Submissions approved by administrative order and posted on the websites of the 

supreme court and The Florida Bar. If a change is made without reference to the 

committee, tThe change may become effective immediately or at a future time. In 

either event, the court shall give notice of and fix a date for further consideration of 

the change. Any person may file comments concerning the change, seeking its 

abrogation or a delay in the effective date, in accordance with the procedures set 

forth in subdivision (b)(6) of this rule. The court may allow oral argument in 

support of such comments by The Florida Bar, by its sections and committees, and 

by other bar associations. Notice of the hearingoral argument, if scheduled, on the 

change and a copy of the change shall be furnished to the affected committee 

chair(s) and vice chair(s), the executive director and staff liaison of The Florida 
- 20 -

Bar, all members of the Judicial Management Council, the clerk and chief judge of 

each district court of appeal, the clerk and chief judge of each judicial circuit, the 

Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, the President of the Florida 

Senate, the chairs of the House and Senate committees as designated by the 

Speaker and the President, and any person who has asked in writing filed with the 

clerk of the supreme court for a copy of the notice. The clerk may provide the 

notice electronically. TheNotice of the change shall be published on the Internet 

websites of the supreme court and The Florida Bar, and in the Florida Bar Journal 

orThe Florida Bar NewsNews either before the hearingor after the change is 

adopted. Notice of the hearingoral argument, if scheduled, shall also be published 

on the Internet websites of the supreme court and The Florida Bar, and in the 

Florida Bar Journal or Florida Bar News.

(e) Out-of-Cycle Committee Proposals.

(1) Emergency Recommendations by CommitteeProposals and 

Proposals in Response to Legislative Changes. If, in the opinion of a committee, 

a proposal is of an emergency nature or a rule amendment is necessary due to 

changes in legislation, and the board of governors concurs, proposals may be made 

at any time to the supreme court. The report and proposed rule changes may be 

filed without prior publication for comment and must conform to the Guidelines 

for Rules Submissions approved by administrative order and posted on the Internet 

websites of the supreme court and The Florida Bar. The rules committees’ fasttrack procedures shall be used to address legislative changes to ensure that any

resulting proposed rule amendments are filed with and can be adopted by the court 

before or soon after the effective date of the legislation. If the court agrees that an 

emergency exists or a rule change is necessary due to a legislative change, the 

court may publish the rule amendment for comment after adopting it or may set a 

time for oral argument andor for consideration of the proposal without oral 

argument. Notice of the hearingoral argument on the proposals, if scheduled before 

or after adoption, and a copy of the proposals shall be furnished to the affected 

committee chair(s) and vice chair(s), the executive director and the staff liaison of 

The Florida Bar, all members of the Judicial Management Council, the clerk and 

chief judge of each district court of appeal, the clerk and chief judge of each 

judicial circuit, the Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, the President 

of the Florida Senate, the chairs of the House and Senate committees as designated 

by the Speaker and the President, and any person who has asked in writing filed

with the clerk of the supreme court for a copy of the notice. The clerk may provide 

the notice electronically. Prior to or after their adoption, Tthe recommendations or 

a resume of them shall be published on the Internet websites of the supreme court 
- 21 -

and The Florida Bar, and in the Florida Bar Journal orThe Florida Bar NewsNews

before the hearing. Any person may file comments concerning the changes, in 

accordance with the procedures set forth in subdivision (b)(6). Notice of the 

hearingoral argument, if scheduled, shall also be published on the Internet websites

of the supreme court and The Florida Bar, and in the Florida Bar Journal or Florida 

Bar News.

(2) Non-Emergency Out-of-Cycle Proposals. If, in the opinion of 

a committee, a proposal is not of an emergency nature, but is sufficiently necessary 

to the administration of justice that it should not wait until the next regular-cycle

submission, and the board of governors concurs, proposals may be made out-ofcycle at any time to the supreme court. The report and proposed rule changes must 

conform to the Guidelines for Rules Submissions approved by administrative order

and posted on the websites of the supreme court and The Florida Bar. Such out-ofcycle submissions must be published in The Florida Bar News and posted on the 

website of The Florida Bar for comment, and such comment must be reviewed and 

addressed by the committee prior to the out-of-cycle rule submission to the board 

of governors to recommend acceptance, rejection, or amendment. If the supreme 

court agrees that a proposal should be addressed before the next regular-cycle

report, the supreme court may set a time for oral argument or for consideration of 

the proposal without oral argument. Notice of the oral argument on the proposals, 

if scheduled, and a copy of the proposals shall be furnished to the affected 

committee chair(s) and vice chair(s), the executive director and the staff liaison of 

The Florida Bar, all members of the Judicial Management Council, the clerk and 

chief judge of each district court of appeal, the clerk and chief judge of each 

judicial circuit, the Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, the President 

of the Florida Senate, the chairs of the House and Senate committees as designated 

by the Speaker and the President, the person who initially proposed the matter to 

the committee, and any person who has asked in writing filed with the clerk of the 

supreme court for a copy of the notice. The clerk may provide the notice 

electronically. The recommendations or a resume of them shall be published on the 

websites of the supreme court and The Florida Bar, and in The Florida Bar News

for comment before the oral argument or consideration of the proposals without 

oral argument. Any person may file comments concerning the proposals, in 

accordance with the procedures set forth in subdivision (b)(6). Notice of the oral 

argument, if scheduled, shall also be published on the website of the supreme 

court.

(f) Request by Court. The supreme court may direct special 

consideration of a proposal at times other than those specified in this rule and may 
- 22 -

require a committee to report its recommendation with the recommendations of the 

board of governors. All requests or submissions by a rules committee made in 

connection with a request under this subdivision shall be filed with or submitted to

the clerk of the supreme court as provided in this subdivision. The report and 

proposed rule changes must conform to the Guidelines for Rules Submissions 

approved by administrative order and posted on the Internet websites of the 

supreme court and The Florida Bar. The supreme court may set oral argument on 

the report at any time. Notice of the hearing on the proposals and a copy of the 

proposals shall be furnished to the affected committee chair and vice chair, the 

executive director of The Florida Bar, all members of the Judicial Management 

Council, the clerk and chief judge of each district court of appeal, the clerk and 

chief judge of each judicial circuit, the Speaker of the Florida House of 

Representatives, the President of the Florida Senate, the chairs of the House and 

Senate committees as designated by the Speaker and the President, and any person 

who has asked in writing filed with the clerk of the supreme court for a copy of the 

notice. The clerk may provide the notice electronically. The recommendations or a 

resume of them shall be published on the Internet websites of the supreme court 

and The Florida Bar, and in the Florida Bar Journal or Florida Bar News before the 

hearing. Notice of the hearing shall also be published on the Internet websites of 

the supreme court and The Florida Bar, and in the Florida Bar Journal or Florida 

Bar News.

(1) Recommended Rule Changes. A rule change recommended in 

response to a request under this subdivision shall be included in the rules 

committee’s next regular-cycle report filed under subdivision (b), unless the court 

directs or the committee determines and the board of governors agrees that the rule 

change should be submitted out of cycle. If the committee submits a recommended 

change out of cycle, the procedures for out-of-cycle rule proposals under 

subdivision (e) shall apply, except the report shall state that it is filed in response to 

a request by the court under this subdivision.

(2) No Action Recommendations. If the court refers a matter to a 

rules committee for consideration only and does not direct the committee to 

propose a rule change, and after considering the matter referred the committee 

determines that no rule change is warranted, the committee shall submit a “no 

action report” to the court explaining its recommendation that no rule change is 

needed. A no action recommendation should not be included in a report proposing 

rule changes filed under any other subdivision of this rule. After the court 

considers the recommendation, the clerk shall notify the rules committee chair(s) 
- 23 -

and the executive director and the staff liaison of The Florida Bar whether any 

further action is required of the committee. 

(g) Amendments to the Rules of Judicial Administration.

(1) Amendments Without Referral to Rules Committee.

Changes to the Rules of Judicial Administration contained in Part II, State Court 

Administration, of these rules, and rules 2.310, and 2.320, contained in Part III, 

Judicial Officers, generally will be considered and adopted by the supreme court 

without reference to or proposal from the Rules of Judicial Administration 

Committee. The supreme court may amend rules under this subdivision at any 

time, with or without notice. If a change is made without notice, the court shall fix 

a date for future consideration of the change and the change shall be published on 

the Internet websites of the supreme court and The Florida Bar, and in the Florida 

Bar Journal orThe Florida Bar NewsNews. Any person may file comments 

concerning the change, in accordance with the procedures set forth in subdivision 

(b)(6) of this rule. The court may hear oral argument on the change. Notice of the 

hearingoral argument on the change, if scheduled, and a copy of the change shall 

be provided in accordance with subdivision (d) of this rule.

(2) Other Amendments. Amendments to all other Rules of 

Judicial Administration shall be referred to or proposed by the Rules of Judicial 

Administration Committee and adopted by the supreme court as provided in 

subdivisions (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) of this rule.

(h) [No Change]

Committee Notes

[No Change]

RULE 2.510. FOREIGN ATTORNEYS

(a) Eligibility. Upon filing a verified motion with the court, an attorney 

who is an active member in good standing of the bar of another state and currently 

eligible to practice law in a state other than Florida may be permitted to appear in 

particular cases in a Florida court upon such conditions as the court may deem 

appropriate, provided that a member of The Florida Bar in good standing is 

associated as an attorney of record. The foreign attorney must make application in 
- 24 -

each court in which a case is filed even if a lower tribunal granted a motion to 

appear in the same case. In determining whether to permit a foreign attorney to 

appear pursuant to this rule, the court may consider, among other things, 

information provided under subdivision (b)(3) concerning discipline in other 

jurisdictions. No attorney is authorized to appear pursuant to this rule if the 

attorney (1) is a Florida resident, unless the attorney has an application pending for 

admission to The Florida Bar and has not previously been denied admission to The 

Florida Bar; (2) is a member of The Florida Bar but is ineligible to practice law; 

(3) has previously been disciplined or held in contempt by reason of misconduct 

committed while engaged in representation permitted pursuant to this rule 

provided, however, the contempt is final and has not been reversed or abated; (4) 

has failed to provide notice to The Florida Bar or pay the filing fee as required in 

subdivision (b)(7); or (5) is engaged in a “general practice” before Florida courts. 

For purposes of this rule, more than 3 appearances within a 365-day period in 

separate cases shall be presumed to be a “general practice.” Appearances at 

different levels of the court system in the same case shall be deemed 1 appearance 

for the purposes of determining whether a foreign attorney has made more than 3 

appearances within a 365-day period. In cases involving indigent or pro bono 

clients, the court may waive the filing fee for good cause shown. This rule shall not 

affect the eligibility of a foreign attorney to appear in a Florida court when 

authorized by federal law.

(b) [No Change]

IN THE _________ COURT OF THE 

__________ JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, 

IN AND FOR _______________, 

COUNTY, FLORIDA

Plaintiff

Case No. ..........

vs. Division ..........

Defendant

VERIFIED MOTION FOR ADMISSION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE

PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION 

2.510
- 25 -

Comes now , 

Movant herein, and respectfully represents the following:

1. [ ] Movant resides in , 

(City) (State)

Movant is not a resident of the State of Florida.

[ ] Movant is a resident of the State of Florida and has an application 

pending for admission to The Florida Bar and has not previously been denied 

admission to The Florida Bar.

2. Movant is an attorney and a member of the law firm of (or practices 

law under the name of) , with offices at

, , _________________,

(Street Address) (City) (County)

, , 

 (State) (Zip Code) (Telephone)

3. Movant has been retained personally or as a member of the above 

named law firm on by 

(Date Representation Commenced)

to provide legal representation in connection with

(Name of Party or Parties)

the above-styled matter now pending before the above-named court of the State of 

Florida. 

4. Movant is an active member in good standing and currently eligible to 

practice law in the following jurisdiction(s): Include attorney or bar number(s). 

(Attach an additional sheet if necessary.)

JURISDICTION ATTORNEY/BAR NUMBER
- 26 -

5. There have been no disciplinary, suspension, disbarment, or contempt 

proceedings initiated against Movant in the preceding 5 years, except as provided 

below (give jurisdiction of proceeding, date upon which proceeding was initiated, 

nature of alleged violation, statement of whether the proceeding has concluded or 

is still pending, and sanction, if any, imposed): (Attach an additional sheet if 

necessary.)

6. Movant, either by resignation, withdrawal, or otherwise, never has 

terminated or attempted to terminate Movant’s office as an attorney in order to 

avoid administrative, disciplinary, disbarment, or suspension proceedings.

7. Movant is not an inactive member of The Florida Bar.

8. Movant is not now a member of The Florida Bar.

9. Movant is not a suspended member of The Florida Bar.

10. Movant is not a disbarred member of The Florida Bar nor has Movant 

received a disciplinary resignation or disciplinary revocation from The Florida Bar.

11. Movant has not previously been disciplined or held in contempt by 

reason of misconduct committed while engaged in representation pursuant to 

Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.510, except as provided below (give date 

of disciplinary action or contempt, reasons therefor, and court imposing contempt): 

(Attach an additional sheet if necessary.)

12. Movant has filed motion(s) to appear as counsel in Florida state courts 

during the past five (5) years in the following matters: (Attach an additional sheet 

if necessary.)

Date of Motion Case Name Case Number Court Date Motion Granted/Denied
- 27 -

13. Local counsel of record associated with Movant in this matter is 

who is an active member in good standing of The

(Name and Florida Bar Number)

Florida Bar and has offices at , , , 

 (Street Address) (City) (County)

________________, , .

(State) (Zip Code) (Telephone with area code)

(If local counsel is not an active member of The Florida Bar in good standing, 

please provide information as to local counsel’s membership status. 

___________________________________)

14. Movant has read the applicable provisions of Florida Rule of Judicial 

Administration 2.510 and Rule 1–3.10 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar 

and certifies that this verified motion complies with those rules.

15. Movant agrees to comply with the provisions of the Florida Rules of 

Professional Conduct and consents to the jurisdiction of the courts and the Bar of 

the State of Florida. 

WHEREFORE, Movant respectfully requests permission to appear in this 

court for this cause only.

DATED this ___________ day of ___________________, 20____.

Movant

Address

Address
- 28 -

City, State, Zip Code

Telephone Number

E-mail Address

STATE OF ______________________

COUNTY OF ______________________

I, ________________________________, do hereby swear or affirm under 

penalty of perjury that I am the Movant in the above-styled matter; that I have read 

the foregoing Motion and know the contents thereof, and the contents are true of 

my own knowledge and belief.

Movant

I hereby consent to be associated as local counsel of record in this cause 

pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.510. 

DATED this ___________ day of __________________________, 20____.

Local Counsel of Record

Address

Address

City, State, Zip Code

Telephone Number

Florida Bar Number

E-mail Address
- 29 -

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing motion 

was served by mail to PHV Admissions, The Florida Bar, 651 East Jefferson 

Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2333 accompanied by payment of the $250.00 

filing fee made payable to The Florida Bar, or notice that the movant has requested 

a judicial waiver of said fee; and by (e-mail) (delivery) (mail) (fax) to (name of 

attorney or party if not represented)

this ________ day of ______________________, 20____.

Movant

RULE 2.516. SERVICE OF PLEADINGS AND DOCUMENTS

(a) [No Change]

(b) Service; How Made. When service is required or permitted to be 

made upon a party represented by an attorney, service must be made upon the 

attorney unless service upon the party is ordered by the court.

(1) Service by Electronic Mail (“e-mail”). All documents 

required or permitted to be served on another party must be served by e-mail, 

unless the parties otherwise stipulate or this rule otherwise provides. A filer of an 

electronic document has complied with this subdivision if the Florida Courts efiling Portal (“Portal”) or other authorized electronic filing system with a supreme 

court approved electronic service system (“e-Service system”) served the 

document by e-mail or provided a link by e-mail to the document on a website 

maintained by a clerk (“e-Service”). The filer of an electronic document must 

verify that the Portal or other e-Service system uses the names and e-mail 

addresses provided by the parties pursuant to subdivision (b)(1)(A).

(A) [No Change]
- 30 -

(B) Exception to E-mail Service on Attorneys. Upon 

motion by an attorney demonstrating that the attorney has no e-mail account and 

lacks access to the Internet at the attorney’s office, the court may excuse the 

attorney from the requirements of e-mail service. Service on and by an attorney 

excused by the court from e-mail service must be by the means provided in 

subdivision (b)(2) of this rule.

(C) Service on and by Parties Not Represented by an 

Attorney. Any party not represented by an attorney may serve a designation of a 

primary e-mail address and also may designate no more than two secondary e-mail 

addresses to which service must be directed in that proceeding by the means 

provided in subdivision (b)(1) of this rule. If a party not represented by an attorney 

does not designate an e-mail address for service in a proceeding, service on and by 

that party must be by the means provided in subdivision (b)(2) of this rule.

(D) [No Change]

(E) Format of E-mail for Service. Service of a document by 

e-mail is made by an e-mail sent to all addresses designated by the attorney or 

party with either (a) a copy of the document in PDF format attached or (b) a link to 

the document on a website maintained by a clerk.

(i) All documents served by e-mail must be sent by an 

e-mail message containing a subject line beginning with the words “SERVICE OF 

COURT DOCUMENT” in all capital letters, followed by the case number and case 

style of the proceeding in which the documents are being served.

(ii) – (iv) [No Change]

(2) Service by Other Means. In addition to, and not in lieu of, 

service by e-mail, service may also be made upon attorneys by any of the means 

specified in this subdivision. If a document is served by more than one method of 

service, the computation of time for any response to the served document shall be 

based on the method of service that provides the shortest response time. Service on 

and by all parties who are not represented by an attorney and who do not designate 

an e-mail address, and on and by all attorneys excused from e-mail service, must 

be made by delivering a copy of the document or by mailing it to the party or 

attorney at their last known address or, if no address is known, by leaving it with 

noting the non-service in the certificate of service, and stating in the certificate of 

service that a copy of the served document may be obtained, on request, from the 
- 31 -

clerk of the court or from the party serving the document. Service by mail is 

complete upon mailing. Delivery of a copy within this rule is complete upon:

(A) – (F) [No Change]

(c) – (h) [No Change]