alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Am-241 Safety Incident

Richard Kayser

Chief Safety Officer

NIST Visiting Committee on Advanced Technology

October 23, 2017
2

Agenda

• NIST’s Role in Radiation Physics

• Unplanned Contamination Event

• Unplanned Contamination in Unrestricted Areas

• Bioassay Results and Current Dose Estimates

• Incident Investigation

• Next Steps
3

NIST’s Role in Radiation Physics

Jim Olthoff, Director

Physical Measurement Laboratory

Building 245

Radiation Physics
4

Unplanned Contamination Event
5
6
7
8
9
10

Initial Incident Response

• Issued stop work order

• Determined extent of condition of inherently unsafe ampoules

• Put inherently unsafe ampoules in a safe configuration

• Identified potentially exposed individuals – “flying blind”

• Surveyed and decontaminated spaces

• Engaged experts at the Radiation Emergency Assistance Center

and Training Site (REAC/TS)

• Initiated bioassays: lung scans, urinalysis
11

Initial Urinalysis Results

• Received results for three individuals at highest risk (09/05)

– One detect – Individual #1

– Two non-detect

• Dose assuming inhalation pathway above regulatory limits – updated NRC 

event report (09/06)

• Dose assuming ingestion pathway > 5 times regulatory limits – updated NRC 

event report (09/08); 30-day report required

• REACT/TS advised medical treatment 
12

Unplanned Contamination in Unrestricted Areas
13

Discovery of Contamination in Unrestricted Areas

• Found low levels of Am-241 in two offices

• Asked the DOE Radiological Assistance Program 

(RAP) to assist in controlling the potential spread 

of contamination (09/10)

• Restricted access to Building 245 (09/11)

• Established Incident Response Team (IRT) to 

support, coordinate, inform (09/11)

• RAP team finds no Am-241 contamination (09/16)
14

Return to Work in Building 245 

• Reopened office spaces (09/18)

• Established four-step process to reopen laboratory spaces

– Identify sources in laboratory space 

– Perform evaluation of safety 

– Perform evaluation of need to keep

– Determine need of mission critical work

• Requires approval by the Radiation Safety Officer and line management up 

to and including NIST Director
15

Bioassays and Current Dose Estimates 

• Urinalysis for 34 individuals

– Individual #1 – above minimum detectable activity (MDA) 

– Individual #2 – slightly above MDA

• Results of two retests below MDA; awaiting results of third retest

– 32 individuals below MDA

• Dose estimates for Individual #1

– Inhalation v. ingestion v. wound pathway

– Subject matter experts on internal dosimetry and dose reconstruction

– Estimated dose for the wound pathway below all occupational dose limits
16

Incident Investigation

Rob Dimeo, Director

NIST Center for Neutron Research
17

Next Steps

• Finish re-opening labs in Building 245

• Decontaminate Room C11

• Complete incident investigation

• Take corrective actions identified in two NRC 30-day reports

• Await NRC’s final inspection report 

• Develop an incident response playbook
18

Discussion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROSE PAGE, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION 09-0021-WS-M

 )

WINN-DIXIE MONTGOMERY, INC., )

et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order entered on this date, granting Defendants’ Joint Motion for

Summary Judgment (doc. 45) and denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

(doc. 47), it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same hereby is,

dismissed with prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED this 18th day of March, 2010.

s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00021-WS-M Document 68 Filed 03/18/10 Page 1 of 1
Parraguirre 

ca, 

Douglas 

J. 

right to due process because the statutes are too ambiguous. We decline to 

exercise our discretion to consider the petition for two reasons. See State 

ex rel. Dep't Transp. v. Thompson, 99 Nev. 358, 662 P.2d 1338 (1983) 

(explaining that extraordinary writ petitions are addressed to this court's 

sound discretion), modified on other grounds by State v. Eighth Judicial 

Dist. Court, 118 Nev. 140, 147, 42 P.3d 233, 237 (2002). First, this court 

generally does not exercise its discretion to entertain a claim concerning a 

pretrial challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support probable 

cause, see Kussman v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 96 Nev. 544, 546, 612 

P.2d 679, 680 (1980), and Ice has not demonstrated that his challenge fits 

within the exception we have made for purely legal issues, see Ostman v. 

Eighth Judicial Din. Court, 107 Nev. 563, 565, 816 P.2d 458, 459-60 

(1991); State v. Babayan, 106 Nev. 155, 174, 787 P.2d 805, 819-20 (1990). 

Second, should Ice be convicted, he has an adequate remedy at law by way 

of an appeal to challenge to the constitutionality of the robbery statutes as 

they apply to the facts of his case. See NRS 34.170. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

Cherry 

a kit 14 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 1947A e 

J. 
cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge 

The Law Offices of Ivette Amelburu Maningo 

Palm Law Firm, Ltd. 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

3 

(0) 1947A
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial informtion extracted from
Dean Witter Diversified Futures Fund II L.P. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       7,653,168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,375<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,352,245<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,352,245<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               480,364<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               202,814
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                277,550
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            277,550
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   277,550
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $31,375.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $667,702.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $451,569 and accrued
management fee of $20,881.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $19,031,
net change in unrealized of $374,028, and interest income of
$87,305.
</FN>


</TABLE>
www.swgmdi.org          info@swgmdi.org

PRC#1 Guidelines For Media Relations‐ Comment Report

Public Review and Comment‐ Jan 6 to March 2, 2012

Total responses received= 12

58% endorsed the draft as is.

In general comments received were overall positive. Reflected below were specific edits that were

recommended and taken under advisement.

Comment Type Received Result

Document should be NIMS

compliant and use NIMS

terminology

Additional wording added to disclaimer to: This is intended for day‐

to‐day functions of ME/Coroner offices. In the event that the

Incident Command System is activated then National Incident

Management System protocol will apply.

Utilizing Press for Unidentified

Decedents

This will be covered by Unidentified Decedent Committee

Guidelines

Strong language (NO, shall not,

Never) is too strong for

guidelines

Change language of will and shall to may and should.

Does not comport with a state

law

Disclaimer takes this issue under account

Reordering of list of

professionals

Taken under advisement

Change list of media reps to

general term of “media

representatives”

Taken under advisement

Release of information to media

should be simultaneous,

especially in high profile cases

Document edited to reflect.

Release of event “circumstance”

information

Taken under advisement

Release DOB Taken under advisement

Not release findings or lab test

until case is closed

As written in document

Publicity can be ally. Amend

statement of “never seek

publicity”.  

Edited doc to reflect intention of statement: ME/C or agency

representatives should not seek personal publicity
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME OF
MONSANTO COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND THE STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL POSITION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999. SUCH
INFORMATION IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              89
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,119
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,722
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,195
<PP&E>                                           5,185
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,780
<BONDS>                                          6,259
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,694
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,385
<SALES>                                          7,237
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,237
<CGS>                                            2,912
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (85)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        46
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (131)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (119)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (250)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.41)


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

vs. : CRIMINAL NO. 08-00177-CG

ANGELO LARMONE MASSEY :

ORDER 

This cause, as to the above-named defendant, having been continued into the September,

2008 criminal term, a pretrial conference is hereby scheduled to be conducted in Courtroom 3A,

before Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady, on August 5, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. Defense counsel and

counsel for the Government shall be prepared to discuss all pending motions and discovery requests,

possible stipulations, estimated length of the trial, change of plea, and any other preliminary matters.

The defendant may attend this conference, but his/her presence is not required. Counsel who want

in-custody defendants to attend must notify the Magistrate Judge within three days of the

conference date so that an order to produce can be issued to the United States Marshal. The

parties are expected to give a firm commitment at the pretrial conference as to the final disposition

of this case. No case will be continued except under extraordinary circumstances and only for good

cause shown. Motions for a continuance will only be considered if they have been filed prior

to the pretrial conference and have an appropriate speedy trial waiver attached.

MANDATORY APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL. Counsel of record for all parties are

ORDERED to appear at all future Court proceedings in this criminal case. Those attorneys who find

it impossible to be in attendance (especially at the Probation conference, the pretrial conference, jury

selection, or trial) must make arrangements to have substitute counsel appear on behalf of their

clients. Any attorney who appears as substitute counsel for a defendant shall have full authorization

from the defendant to act on his or her behalf and be fully prepared to proceed. Substitute counsel

shall not be counsel for a co-defendant unless permitted by the Court after proper motion.

LOCAL RULES. All parties are reminded that the Local Rules and Standing Orders of the

Southern District of Alabama contain important requirements concerning discovery, representation

of defendants, and other matters. They are reprinted in ALABAMA RULES OF COURT (West

Publishing Co.) and ALABAMA RULES ANNOTATED (The Michie Co.), and posted on the

Court’s website, http://www.als.uscourts.gov . Since they are amended from time to time, the most

current version may be the version posted by the Clerk of Court. 

DONE and ORDERED this 24th day of July, 2008.

s/WILLIAM E. CASSADY 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:08-cr-00177-CG-M Document 52 Filed 07/24/08 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of SWK Holdings
Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Brett Pope Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, certify, in accordance with Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report, to which this certification
is attached as Exhibit 32.01, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







|Date: August 4, 2014                          | 
|--------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ J. Brett
    Pope                         | 
|J. Brett Pope
        Chief Executive Officer | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained
by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23.1


              CONSENT OF ODENBERG ULLAKKO MURANISHI & COMPANY, LLP



               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants




We  consent  to the use in  this  Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB  of  AccuImage
Diagnostics  Corp.  of our  report  dated  December  8,  2003,  relating  to the
financial statements of AccuImage Diagnostics Corp., which appear in such Annual
Report.  We also consent to the  reference to us under the heading  "Experts" in
such Annual Report.



/s/ ODENBERG ULLAKKO MURANISHI & Company, LLP



Odenberg Ullakko Muranishi & Company, LLP
San Francisco, CA
December 8, 2003
**Exhibit      32**

----

**CERTIFICATION***

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   |   |   |                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | */s/ Norman              A. Morales*                                            |
|        |   |   |                                                                                      |
|   |   |   | Norman              A. Morales                                                  |
|   |   |   | President              and Chief Executive Officer                              |
|   |   |   |                                                                                 |
|   |   |   |                                                                                 |
|   |   |   |  */s/ Gordon              Fong*                                            |
|   |   |   |                                                                                      |
|   |   |   | Gordon              Fong                                                        |
|   |   |   | Executive              Vice President and Chief Financial              Officer  |

***      **
***A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to      the      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon      request.***
NIST Safety Update

Richard Kayser

Chief Safety Officer, NIST

Visiting Committee on Advanced Technology

June 7, 2016

Welcome
2014 NIST Safety Climate Survey Planned Actions

01 EMPLOYEE RIGHTS

AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Improve communication to employees 

of their safety rights and responsibilities.

02 UNSAFE CONDITIONS 

AND PRACTICES

Provide guidance on addressing 

unsafe conditions and practices.

03 INCIDENT REPORTING & 

LESSONS LEARNED

Implement improved incident reporting 

processes and mechanisms for sharing 

lessons learned.

04 SAFETY TRAINING

Improve the quality of 

safety training.

05 MANAGEMENT OBSERVATIONS

Incorporate discussions of safety culture 

issues into management observations.

06 PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS

Re-emphasize the importance of employees 

receiving safety performance feedback during 

performance appraisals. 
AGENDA

Report regularly to VCAT on NIST’s safety improvement efforts.

INCIDENT 

REPORTING

CONTINUAL SAFETY 

LEARNING

WORKPLACE 

INSPECTIONS

2
Workplace Inspections

OU-led inspections with 

Safety Office notification

Clear roles & responsibilities

Minimum frequencies

Trained OU inspectors
Workplace Inspections

Classification of deficiencies

Recommended abatement 

actions & interim measures

Abatement plans

Electronic data collection
2014 NIST Safety Climate Survey

A large majority of respondents 

agreed that reporting incidents helps 

improve safety at NIST. 

Less than half of respondents use 

incident reports for lessons 

learned.

Apparent disconnect between 

perceived value and practical 

application. 

1

2

3
Improve 

What’s Reported

Improve Incident 

Investigations

Improve Sharing 

Lessons Learned

Opportunities for Improvement

1

2

3
Additional Program Improvements

Clarify incident types 01

Exclude unsafe

conditions

03

05

Increase reporting

of “near misses”

02

04

06

Implement corrective 

action tracking system

Provide additional 

tools/resources

Streamline reporting

of simple incidents
1

Spaced out over time

What is Microlearning?

Less time disruptive

Accessible

Small, bite-sized bursts

Focused building blocks

One objective/idea

3

4

5

6

2
Microlearning Strategy

Internal and 

external incidents

Critical-thinking 

exercises

Workplace 

inspection data Video

Management/staff 

observations

Peer-to-peer 

conversations
Balanced

Continually Evaluate and Improve 

Microlearning Strategy

Targeted

• Ensure no one receives 

too many or too few

• Over time, reinforce all 

requirements

• Build targeted lists 

using Safety Education 

and Training application

• Track open rates and engagement and adjust strategy
NIST Safety 

Minutes

Motivated by 

incidents and 

inspection data

Two-minute 

“how to” video 

Targeted and 

personalized

Safety 

Support
Learning On Demand

Over time, we will build 

a library of quick

reference materials on 

specific topics that can 

be easily accessed by 

staff members who 

want a refresher.
DISCUSSION
| 1.   | The                  Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                  or 15(d)                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                  and |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                  information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all                  material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  July                  30, 2007 | /s/                  Joseph D.                  Reid                                                                                                  Joseph                  D. ReidChief                  Executive Officer |
|-------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----