alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28790]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-509 and 731-TA-1244 (Final)]


1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane From China

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject 
investigations, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to sections 705(b) and 735(b) of 
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)) and (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) 
(``the Act''), that an industry in the United States is not materially 
injured or threatened with material injury, and the establishment of an 
industry in the United States is not materially retarded, by reason of 
imports of 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane from China, provided for in 
subheading 2903.39.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States, that have been found by the Department of Commerce 
(``Commerce'') to be sold in the United States at less than fair value 
(``LTFV'') and subsidized by the government of China.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioners Irving A. Williamson and Rhonda K. Schmidtlein 
dissenting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these investigations effective October 
22, 2013, following receipt of a petition filed with the Commission and 
Commerce by Mexichem Fluor Inc., St. Gabriel, LA. The final phase of 
the investigations was scheduled by the Commission following 
notification of preliminary determinations by Commerce that imports of 
1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane from China were subsidized within the meaning 
of section 703(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671b(b)) and sold at LTFV 
within the meaning of 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of 
the scheduling of the final phase of the Commission's investigations 
and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by 
posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the 
notice in the Federal Register on June 24, 2014 (79 FR 35795). The 
hearing was held in Washington, DC on October 15, 2014, and all persons 
who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by 
counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these 
investigations to the Secretary of Commerce on December 3, 2014. The 
views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4503 
(December 2014), entitled 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane from China: 
Investigation Nos. 701-TA-509 and 731-TA-1244 (Final).

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: December 4, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-28790 Filed 12-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

#### **Pursuant toSection 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. §7241)**

 

I, Lawrence I. Wills,certify that:

 

1)     I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Granite Broadcasting Corporation;

 

2)     Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3)     Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4)     The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)             designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)            evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)             disclosedin this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5)     The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)             allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)            anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: November 10, 2005

 
|   | /s/LAWRENCE I. WILLS     |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Lawrence I. Wills        |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-92,046-03

EX P ARTE DERIC EUGENE MA DISON, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W14-76000-U( C) IN THE 291 DISTRICT COURT ST F ROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam . Y E A R Y , J. fi led a concurring opin ion. O R D E R Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenc ed to life imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appea ls aff

irmed his conviction. Madison v. State , No. 05-15-00859- CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Nov. 8, 2016)(not desig nated for publication) Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district c lerk forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffe ctiv e b y reque sting a felony murder char g e which contra dicted the defe nse at trial, by abandoning and failing to arg ue the viable defe nse, and by failing to move for a direc ted verdic t. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Acc ording ly , the rec ord2

should be develope d. The trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. I n developing the re cord, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f t he trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately

notify this Court of counsel’s name

. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s perf ormanc e was defic ient and Appl i ca n t wa s p rejudice d. The trial court may make any other finding s and conc lusions that it deems a ppropriate in response to Applica nt’s claims. The t ri al court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, o rders, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: January

25, 2023 Do not publish
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Ronald Mustari, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executiveofficer) of Whitehall Limited, Inc. certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Whitehall Limited,Inc.;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any changein the registrant's internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, theregistrant's control over financial reporting; and
5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 14, 2005     */s/ Ronald Mustari*    Ronald Mustari, President and
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit 

No. 14-1058 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Appellee, 

v. 

WILLIAM BERRÍOS-CRUZ, 

Defendant, Appellant. 

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

[Hon. Carmen Consuelo Cerezo, U.S. District Judge] 

Before 

Howard, Chief Judge, 

Torruella and Kayatta, Circuit Judges. 

Lenore Glaser on brief for appellant. 

Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez, United States Attorney, Nelson 

Pérez-Sosa, Assistant United States Attorney, Chief, Appellate 

Division, and Thomas F. Klumper, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Senior Appellate Counsel, on brief for appellee. 

December 12, 2016 
- 2 -

PER CURIAM. Defendant-Appellant William Berríos-Cruz 

appeals certain special conditions of supervised release imposed 

in connection with his guilty plea to production of child 

pornography. See 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). Because Berríos's plea 

agreement contained a knowing and voluntary waiver of any right to 

appeal his sentence, we may reach the merits of his claims only to 

prevent a "miscarriage of justice." United States v. VélezLuciano, 814 F.3d 553, 559 (1st Cir. 2016). With respect to all 

but one of the challenged conditions, Berríos falls short of this 

bar and, accordingly, we must enforce his appellate waiver. 

Condition four's requirement that Berríos submit to 

penile plethysmograph ("PPG") testing, however, presents a 

different situation. Indeed, the government concedes that this 

requirement, imposed without any explanation by the district 

court, should be vacated. See United States v. Medina, 779 F.3d 

55, 71 (1st Cir. 2015) (holding that the district court must 

"provide a substantial justification before making submission to 

PPG testing part of a condition of supervised release"). We agree 

that enforcement of Berríos's appellate waiver with respect to the 

PPG testing requirement would result in a miscarriage of justice. 

See Vélez-Luciano, 814 F.3d at 564-65 (holding that "potentially 

subjecting [the defendant] to PPG testing when the government 

expressly disavows the utility of this particular procedure about 
- 3 -

which we have expressed reservations, especially when the record 

lacks any explanation of the applicability of PPG testing to this 

defendant, constitutes a miscarriage of justice," as well as plain 

error (citation omitted)). 

For the foregoing reasons, we VACATE the portion of 

condition four that authorizes PPG testing and remand for the 

district court to consider the parties' joint recommendation that 

the relevant part of the condition be stricken. We AFFIRM all 

other aspects of Berríos's sentence.
<PAGE> 1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

MONSANTO COMPANY:

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in Monsanto Company's
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-36636, 2-76696, 2-90152, 33-13197,
33-21030, 33-39704, 33-39705, 33-39706, 33-39707, 33-49717, 33-53363, 33-53365
and 33-53367) and on Form S-3 (No. 33-60189) of our opinions dated February 23,
1996, appearing in and incorporated by reference in this annual report on Form
10-K of Monsanto Company for the year ended December 31, 1995.

                                                       DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
                                                       DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Saint Louis, Missouri
March 15, 1996

                        ------------------------
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Historic Preservation Properties 1989
LP ("HPP'89") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HPP'89.

/s/ Robert Gunn
--------------------------
Robert Gunn
Asset Manager
(Performing similar functions of Financial Officer)

Date:  May 6, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NABISCO, INC. WHICH WERE FILED WITH SEC
FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000069526
<NAME> NABISCO, INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      681
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        898
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,884
<PP&E>                                           5,053
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,966)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,920
<BONDS>                                          3,892
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,975
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,707
<SALES>                                          8,268
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,268
<CGS>                                            4,502
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,502
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   213
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (67)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 260
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    582
<INCOME-TAX>                                       222
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                360
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (3)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       357
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29254]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-14-041]


Sunshine Act Meeting; Change of Time of Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  United States International Trade 
Commission.

DATE:  December 15, 2014.

NEW TIME:  12:00 p.m.

PLACE:  Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS:  Open to the public.
    In accordance with 19 CFR 201.35(d)(1), the Commission hereby gives 
notice that the meeting of December 15, 2014 will be held at 12:00 p.m.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting. Earlier notification of this change 
was not possible.

    By order of the Commission:

    Issued: December 10, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-29254 Filed 12-10-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Back to Contents

| Exhibit 32.2 |   |   |
|--------------|--------|--------|

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350****(furnished, not filed)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warrior Energy Services Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald Whitter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ronald WhitterRonald WhitterChief Financial OfficerAugust 11, 2006

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BOYD E. HORTON, :

 :

Plaintiff, :

 :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 05-0659-BH-M

 :

JACK TILLMAN, et al., :

 :

Defendants. :

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be and

is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. 

DONE this 29th day of March, 2006.

s/ W. B. Hand

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00659-BH-M Document 7 Filed 03/29/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


                                 COMPLETEL LCC

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     (Stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                    Period from
                                                                                   commencement
                                                                                   of operations
                                                              Year                (January 8, 1998)
                                                        Ended December 31         Through December 31,
                                                              1999                      1998
                                                  -------------------------     ----------------------
<S>                                               <C>                             <C>

Earnings available for fixed charges:                         $    (48,344)                $   (7,561)
 Net loss before income taxes  Add:                                  9,401                         10
 Fixed Charges
                                                  -------------------------     ----------------------
Adjusted Earnings                                                  (38,943)                    (7,551)

Fixed charges:
     Interest on indebtness                                         (8,604)                        --
     Interest capitalized                                           (1,442)
     Amortization of debt issuance costs                              (570)                        --
     Interest portion of rental and
      lease expenses (1)                                              (227)                       (10)
                                                  -------------------------     ----------------------
                                                                   (10,843)                       (10)
                                                  -------------------------     ----------------------
Deficiency of earnings available to
cover fixed charges                                           $    (49,786)                $   (7,561)
                                                  =========================     ======================
</TABLE>



(1) The interest component of rental and lease expenses has been estimated by
    taking the difference between the gross rent and lease expense and new
    present value of rent and lease expense using the Company's cost of capital
    of 14%, representing the coupon rate on the Company's outstanding senior
    discount notes.