alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1528 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1528

 To require the President to receive an annual comprehensive cognitive 
                  evaluation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2023

  Mr. Santos introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the President to receive an annual comprehensive cognitive 
                  evaluation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Executive Mental Competency 
Protection Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE COGNITIVE EVALUATION OF THE PRESIDENT.

    (a) Evaluation.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than January 1 of each fiscal 
        year, the physician to the President shall conduct a 
        comprehensive cognitive evaluation of the President.
            (2) Requirements.--Any evaluation under paragraph (1) shall 
        include an assessment of the following:
                    (A) General intellect.
                    (B) Reading and reading comprehension.
                    (C) Language usage and understanding.
                    (D) Attention and concentration.
                    (E) Processing speed.
                    (F) Learning and memory.
                    (G) Reasoning.
                    (H) Executive functions.
                    (I) Visuospatial skills.
                    (J) Motor speed and dexterity.
                    (K) Mood and personality.
                    (L) Memory retention
    (b) Report.--Notwithstanding the HIPAA privacy regulations (as 
defined in section 1180(b)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1320d-9(b)(3))), the physician to the President shall make the results 
of any evaluation conducted under subsection (a) available on the White 
House public website.
    (c) Limitation on Funds for Noncompliance.--If a President fails to 
complete the comprehensive cognitive evaluation by January 1 of any 
fiscal year as required by subsection (a), during the remainder of such 
fiscal year no Federal funds may be obligated or expended for travel of 
the President.
                                 <all>
```
#### Leroy HOLMES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steven LENES; Joseph Black; Michael Sheedy; Willie Weldon; Nurse Draffin, Defendants-Appellees, and Mae Brown; Gail Fricks; Robert C. Woods; William Catoe, Defendants.

No. 01-6249.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 17, 2001.

Decided May 25, 2001.

Leroy Holmes, pro se. Jackson L. Bar-wick, Jr., Chapin, SC; Norma Anne Turner Jett, Early & Ness, Bamberg, SC; Phillip Florence, Jr., Davidson, Morrison *&*Lindemann, P.A., Columbia, SC, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Leroy Holmes appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Holmes v. Lenes,*No. CA-00-488-9-20RB (D.S.C. Jan. 25, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 10.17
(d)
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO
EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
     1.
    
    The following sentence is hereby added to the end of Section 4(b) of the Agreement:
  2.
    
    The second and third sentences of Section 9(a)(ii) of the Agreement are hereby deleted in
their entirety and replaced with the following sentences:
  3.
    
    Section 9(e) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
 provided however




---



##### 



provided however
 4.
    
    Section 9(h) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:
 Conditions to Payment and Acceleration; Section 409A of the Code provided however
 2




---



##### 



5.
    
    This Amendment shall be governed by, interpreted under and construed in accordance with the
laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
 6.
    
    Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement is hereby confirmed in all respects.
  MYLAN INC./s/ Rodney L. PiattBy: Rodney L. PiattTitle: Chairman, Compensation Committee/s/ Edward J. Borkowski

Edward J. Borkowski
 3
33


                                                                 Exhibit 32(a)

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of Jordan
Industries, Inc., an Illinois corporation (the "Registrant"), hereby certifies
that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended
September 30, 2005, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. ss.78m(a)) and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.


Date: November 14, 2005


/s/  John W. Jordan II
-------------------------------------
John W. Jordan II
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PHILLIP WAYNE TOMLIN :

(AIS # 235217),

Petitioner, :

v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-00120-CG-B

TONY PATTERSON, :

Respondent. :

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, 

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this petition be and is hereby DENIED and, 

further, that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE this 7th day of August, 2013.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00120-CG-B Document 33 Filed 08/07/13 Page 1 of 1
No. 87-6504.

#### Elliott *v.*Myers, Superintendent, Correctional Training Facility, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.01

                          COMMISSION FILE NO. 1-5492-1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

Know All Men By These Presents, that each person whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints John L. Patenaude and Robert S. Amrein and each of
them, as true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, to sign Nashua Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE                          TITLE             DATE
---------                          -----             ----
<S>                                <C>               <C>
/s/Avrum Gray                      Director          March 14, 2003
-------------------------
Avrum Gray

/s/Mark E. Schwarz                 Director          March 17, 2003
-------------------------
Mark E. Schwarz

/s/John M. Kucharski               Director          March 14 2003
-------------------------
John M. Kucharski

/s/George R. Mrkonic, Jr.          Director          March 17, 2003
-------------------------
George R. Mrkonic, Jr.

/s/James F. Orr III                Director          March 14, 2003
-------------------------
James F. Orr III
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1430 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1430

     To direct the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 
     Agriculture to use certain previously completed environmental 
 assessments and environmental impact statements to satisfy the review 
requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2023

 Mr. Valadao introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
  Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on 
Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To direct the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 
     Agriculture to use certain previously completed environmental 
 assessments and environmental impact statements to satisfy the review 
requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Determination of NEPA Adequacy 
Streamlining Act''.

SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT ADEQUACY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary concerned shall use previously 
completed environmental assessments and environmental impact statements 
to satisfy the requirements of section 102 of the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332) with respect to any 
major Federal action if such Secretary determines that--
            (1) the new proposed action is substantially the same as a 
        previously analyzed proposed action or alternative analyzed in 
        a previous environmental assessment or environmental impact 
        statement; and
            (2) the effects of the proposed action are substantially 
        the same as the effects analyzed in such existing environmental 
        assessments or environmental impact statements.
    (b) Secretary Concerned.--In this section, the term ``Secretary 
concerned'' means--
            (1) with respect to public lands, the Secretary of the 
        Interior; and
            (2) with respect to National Forest System Lands, the 
        Secretary of Agriculture.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99

                       SunGroup, Inc. and Subsidiaries

                      Consolidated Financial Statements

                          December 31, 1997 and 1996


<PAGE>

SunGroup, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


     REVENUE RECOGNITION

     Revenue from barter transactions is recognized in accordance with APB 29
     and, to the extent applicable, EITF 93-11.  Revenue is recognized as
     advertising time is aired while the expense is recognized upon the
     receipt of the bartered merchandise or service. Upon entering into a
     barter agreement, the Corporation records an asset and a liability at the
     estimated fair market value of the product or service to be received. The
     asset is relieved as goods or services are received while the liability
     is relieved as advertising spots are run.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



         CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
                                TO SECTION 1350
                             (FURNISHED, NOT FILED)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Black Warrior Wireline Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William
L. Jenkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ William L. Jenkins
    ------------------



William L. Jenkins
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2005
Exhibit 11

                            DAKA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                  STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE
                 EARNINGS Three months ended September 28, 1996
                             and September 30, 1995
                      (In thousands, except per share data)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  1996        1995
                                                                 ------      ------
<S>                                                             <C>         <C>
Primary:

Net income (loss) ...........................................   $ (4,416)   $  2,255
                                                                ========    ========

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding ........     11,124       8,034
Additional shares assuming conversion of stock options ......       --           341
                                                                --------    --------

Average common shares outstanding and equivalents ...........     11,124       8,375
                                                                ========    ========

Primary earnings (loss) per share:
Net income (loss) ...........................................   $  (0.40)   $   0.27
                                                                ========    ========

Fully Diluted:

Net income (loss) ...........................................   $ (4,414)   $  2,255
Interest expense on Convertible notes, after tax effect .....       --           216
                                                                --------    --------
                                                                $ (4,414)   $  2,471
                                                                ========    ========

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding ........     11,124       8,034
Weighted average number of shares related to notes converted,
  prior to conversion .......................................       --           158
Weighted average number of shares related to Preferred Stock
  converted, prior to conversion ............................       --         1,196
Additional shares issuable upon conversion of Preferred Stock       --           265
Additional shares issuable upon conversion of Notes .........       --         1,292
Additional shares assuming conversion of stock options ......       --           398
                                                                --------    --------
                                                                  11,124      11,343
                                                                ========    ========

Fully diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Net income (loss) ...........................................   $  (0.40)   $   0.22
                                                                ========    ========

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer**
I, Norbert E. Woodhams, Sr. certify that:
1. I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K/A ofPierre Foods, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. /s/ Norbert E. Woodhams, Sr. Norbert E. Woodhams, Sr.*Chief Executive Officer*(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: October 15, 2004
E-2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT (23)(1)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-36636, 2-76696, 33-13197, 33-21030, 33-39704,
33-39705, 33-39706, 33-39707, 33-49717, 33-53363, 33-53365, 33-53367, 333-02783,
333-02961, 333-02963, 333-33531, 333-38599, 333-34112, 333-34344, 333-45341,
333-76653, and 333-40136) of Pharmacia Corporation of our report dated February
12, 2001 relating to the financial statements, which report appears in the
Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated by reference in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


FLORHAM PARK, NEW JERSEY
MARCH 23, 2001
11115.

#### Headley *v.*Maxwell Motor Sales Corporation.

Decided March 3, 1920.

Action of slander; from Fulton superior court—■ Judge Pendleton. November 11, 1919.

Application for certiorari ivas denied by the Supreme Court.

*Winfield Payne Jones,*for plaintiff.

*Anderson, Rountree & Crenshaw,*for defendant.

Broyles, C. J.

1. “A corporation is not liable for damages resulting from the speaking of false, malicious, or defamatory words by one of its agents, even where in uttering such words the speaker -was acting for the benefit of the corporation and within the scope of the duties of his agency, unless it affirmatively appears that the agent was expressly directed or authorized by the corporation to speak the words in question.” *Behre*v. *National Cash Register Co.,*100 *Ga.*213 (1) (27 S. E. 986); *Ozborn*v. *Woolworth,*106 *Ga.*459 (32 S. E. 581); *Southern Ry. Co.*v. *Chambers,*126 *Ga.*408 (4) (55 S. E. 37, 7 L. R. A. (N. S.) 926) ; *Jackson*v. *Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.,*8 *Ga. App.*495 (69 S. E. 919).

*(a)*This principle of law has been so often reaffirmed by the Supreme Court that it is considered useless to grant the request of counsel for the plaintiff in error that the above-named eases be submitted to the Supreme Court for review' if this court should consider them controlling in the instant case.

2. Under the above ruling, and the' pleadings in the instant ease, the court did not err in sustaining the special demurrer to the petition, or, the plaintiff having refused to amend the petition to meet this demurrer, in thereafter dismissing the plaintiff’s case on motion of the defendant; since, with the elimination of that paragraph of the petition which was attacked by the special demurrer, the petition did not show' a cause of action.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*