alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyrone LEE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-7785.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 81, 2001.

Decided June 6, 2001.

Tyrone Lee, pro se.

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Tyrone Lee appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See United States v. Lee,*No. CA-00-209-3 (E.D.Va. Nov. 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

*See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 08-3877

_____________

EMMANUEL NOEL, Appellant

v.

THE BOEING COMPANY

___________

On Appeal from the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (No. 06-cv-2673) District Judge: Honorable Garrett E. Brown, Jr.

___________

Submitted January 26, 2010

Before: FUENTES, FISHER, Circuit Judges , and KANE, District Judge *

* Honorable Yvette Kane, Chie f Judge of the United States

District Court for the Middle Di strict of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.(Opinion Filed: October 1, 2010)

Albert J. Michell, Esq. Albert J. Michell, PC 510 Bainbridge Street

First Floor Philadelphia, PA 19147 Attorney for Appellant

Thomas K. Johnson II, Esq. Leora F. Eisenstadt, Esq.

Dechert LLP

Cira Centre

2929 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19104 Attorneys for Appellees

___________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

___________

FUENTES, Circuit Judge

IT IS NOW ORDERED THAT the first paragraph of the opinion shall be amended to state as follows:

“Defendant, the Boeing Company, filed a pretrial motion for summary judgment with the District Court, which was granted in partand denied in part. The District Court then

conducted a fou r-day bench trial. During the trial, Boeing presented a motion for judgment on partial findings of fact, which was also granted in part and deni ed in part. After the trial, the District Court entered judgment in favor of Boeing on all counts. Plaintiff, Emmanuel Noel appeals these rulings, arguing that the recently enac ted Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 renders his otherwise out-of- time administrative filing timely, preserving his failure to promote cl aim. For the following reasons, we will affirm the District Court’s rulings.

The first three sentences of the first paragraph of Section B of the opinion shall be deleted and replaced with the following:

Before trial, Boeing filed a motion for summary judgment. The District Court granted that motion as it related to Noel’s claim that Boeing violated

Title VII when it failed to send him offsite to Amarillo in May 2002 and when he was not promoted to offsite mechanic Labor Grade 11 in 2003, holding that this claim was time-barred

since Noel did not file a charge of discrimination

with the EEOC until Ma rch 2005, well outside the 300-day statutory time period. At the subsequent bench trial, the District Court also granted Defendant’s motion for Judgment on Partial Findings on Noel ’s claim that he should have been promoted to lead mechanic upon hisreturn to Ridley Park.

The word “reaches ” in the first full paragraph on page twelve of the opinion shall be replaced with the word

“reached.”

There is only one defendant in this case. Therefore,

the word “Defendants” as used on pages 6, 7, 8, and 19 shall be replaced with the word “Def endant.” Also, the word “Defendants'” on the same pages shall be replaced with

“Defendant’s”.

BY THE COURT,

/s/ Julio M. Fuentes Circuit Judge

DATED: 18 October 2010
What is sustainable infrastructure?

1

Infrastructure projects that are planned, designed, constructed, operated, and decommissioned in a manner to ensure economic and

financial, social, environmental (including climate resilience), and institutional sustainability over the entire life cycle of the project.

Source: “What is Sustainable Infrastructure?”, Inter-American Development Bank, Technical Note IDB-TN-1388

Economic Sustainability

• Economic and social returns

• Financial sustainability

• Policy

Social Sustainability

• Poverty, social impact, 

community engagement

• Human and labor rights

• Cultural preservation

Environmental Sustainability

• Climate and natural disasters

• Pollution

• Natural environment preservation

• Efficient use of resources

Institutional Sustainability

• Global and national strategies

• Governance and systemic change

• Management systems and 

accountability

• Capacity building Transportation

Water

Energy

Buildings

Green

Source: Iberdrola, (www.iberdrola.com/sustainability/sustainable-infrastructure)
Benefits of IoT in sustainable infrastructure

2

Graphics source: Iberdrola, (www.iberdrola.com/sustainability/sustainable-infrastructure)

Improve city and community 

preparedness, responsiveness 

and resilience

Increase internal 

efficiency and 

productivity

Increase proactiveness and 

responsiveness to community 

needs

Support ESG and DEI 

initiatives

Reduce 

operating costs

Increase and enhance 

city and community 

services

Quality of Life

Government Efficiency

Health and Wellness

Economic Development

Sustainability

Public Safety

Mobility

Resilience

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion
Areas of “smart infrastructure” and IoT opportunities in cities

3

Graphics source: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/smart-cities.html
Where does sustainable infrastructure fit in a city’s plans?

4

Strategic Plan

“Top-down, multiyear, 

multi-department”

Unplanned

“Stuff happens”

Mayor/Council

“Political priorities”

Operational

“Run the city, day to day”

Quality of Life

Government Efficiency

Health and Wellness

Economic Development

Sustainability

Public Safety

Mobility

Resilience

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion
Common barriers

5

No 

Funding Security

Leadership 

and 

ownership

No Vision 

and 

Strategy

Old 

Policies

Lack of 

Digital 

Skills

Low 

Awareness

Inadequate 

Infrastructure

Silos

Culture

Eternal 

pilots

Outdated

Processes

Long 

procurement 

cycles

Return on X

X = equity, or 

community, or

Investment

Jurisdiction

Standards 

and 

interopera

bility

Immature 

Tech

Priorities

Privacy Digital 

Divide

Resources

Appetite

Inertia

Jurisdiction
Possible areas for recommendations - framework

6

Priorities Innovate Procure Build/ 

Deploy

Operate/

Maintain

Financial (funding/capital, economic model, business model, taxes and credit, other incentives) 

Capabilities and resources (resources, skills, knowledge development)

Policies and regulations

Operations and Programs

Physical and digital infrastructure

Legal
##### 



Exhibit 31.2

I, Kay Carter, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal financial
officer) of Whitehall Limited, Inc. certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Whitehall Limited,
Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report based on such evaluation; and

5.     The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal controls; and

6.     The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 13, 2003

| |  |                                                  
| |  | -------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Kay Carter                                   
| |  |                                                  
| |  | Kay Carter, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
___________________________________ 

Katrice Lippa, Chief

 

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

Effective Dates: 2024-02-01 to 2026-01-31

__

United States Department of Commerce 

National Institute of Standards and Technology 

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

Texas 

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international 

system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented

measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, and

has demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope 2024 to 2025 

Mass Echelon III Volume Transfer, II

1000 kg to 1 mg 1000 gal to 5 gal

5000 lb to 0.001 lb

12 oz to 0.03125 oz Volume Transfer, II LPG

100 gal 

Weight Carts 25 gal

6000 lb to 2500 lb

(Rev.: September 2021)
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 2014)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 74009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29373]



[[Page 74007]]

Vol. 79

Friday,

No. 239

December 12, 2014

Part IV





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Presidential Determination No. 2015-03 of December 3, 2014--Suspension 
of Limitations Under the Jerusalem Embassy Act


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 79 , No. 239 / Friday, December 12, 2014 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 74009]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2015-03 of December 3, 
                2014

                
Suspension of Limitations Under the Jerusalem 
                Embassy Act

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me as President by 
                the Constitution and the laws of the United States, 
                including section 7(a) of the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 
                1995 (Public Law 104-45) (the ``Act''), I hereby 
                determine that it is necessary, in order to protect the 
                national security interests of the United States, to 
                suspend for a period of 6 months the limitations set 
                forth in sections 3(b) and 7(b) of the Act.

                You are authorized and directed to transmit this 
                determination to the Congress, accompanied by a report 
                in accordance with section 7(a) of the Act, and to 
                publish this determination in the Federal Register.

                This suspension shall take effect after transmission of 
                this determination and report to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, December 3, 2014

[FR Doc. 2014-29373
Filed 12-11-14; 11:15 am]
Billing code 4710-10
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          18,840
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               1
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   637
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     89,456
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         585,643
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           571,362
<LOANS>                                      2,292,277
<ALLOWANCE>                                     27,906
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,044,610
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,655,840
<SHORT-TERM>                                   885,928
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             40,196
<LONG-TERM>                                    270,512
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                     192,059
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,044,610
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 46,664
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               11,492
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                58,156
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              19,594
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,101
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           21,055
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      565
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,246
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,262
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,262
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.72
<LOANS-NON>                                     13,167
<LOANS-PAST>                                       933
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   506
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                29,013
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    (504)
<RECOVERIES>                                        50
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               27,906
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            27,906
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT**


**TO
      18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the 2nd Quarter Report of **Bio-Lok
      International Inc.** (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2005, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and
      the undersigned officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      such
      officer’s knowledge:




a)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a)  or
      15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





b)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations  of
      the
      Registrant as of the dates and the periods expressed in the  Report.








**Bio-Lok
      International Inc.**





/s/
      Bruce
      L. Hollander


__________________


Ingo
      K.
      Kozak


Chief
      Financial Officer


June
      15,
      2005






18
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   <ARTICLE>                   5
   <LEGEND>
   THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
   CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS
   QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
   </LEGEND>
   <MULTIPLIER>                1,000
   <CURRENCY>                  U.S.

   <S>                         <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                YEAR
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>            APR-30-1999
   <PERIOD-START>               MAY-01-1998
   <PERIOD-END>                 APR-30-1999
   <EXCHANGE-RATE>                  1.00000
   <CASH>                            19,814
   <SECURITIES>                       3,187
   <RECEIVABLES>                    163,527
   <ALLOWANCES>                      17,272
   <INVENTORY>                      107,995
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                 308,273
   <PP&E>                           195,315
   <DEPRECIATION>                   118,597
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                   432,841
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            107,161
   <BONDS>                                0
   <COMMON>                          11,769
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
   <PREFERRED>                            0
   <OTHER-SE>                       197,645
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     432,841
   <SALES>                          786,693
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                 786,693
   <CGS>                            434,628
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                    738,187
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                   1,515
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 2,722
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                   44,269
   <INCOME-TAX>                      19,908
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>               24,361
   <DISCONTINUED>                         0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
   <CHANGES>                              0
   <NET-INCOME>                      24,361
   <EPS-BASIC>                       4.27
   <EPS-DILUTED>                       4.25


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 8, 2014

No. 04-14-00604-CV

IN RE Ronald E. GOTANCO, M.D. 

and Star Anesthesia, P.A.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On August 26, 2014, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court is of the 

opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further 

consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest 

may file a response to the petition in this court no later than September 22, 2014. Any such 

response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

It is so ORDERED on September 8th, 2014. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2012-CI-09786, styled Tonya R. Catalano and Anthony N. Catalano v. 

Ronald E. Gotanco, M.D. and Star Anesthesia, P.A., pending in the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, 

Texas, the Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe presiding.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BYRONELL M. WELLS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION 05-0356-CG-D

)

J. C. GILES, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this

Court. It is ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for habeas corpus relief be DISMISSED as

time-barred.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of January, 2006.

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00356-CG-M Document 20 Filed 01/23/06 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOE HENRY SCOTT, III, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-00454-CG-B

JERRY L. FERRELL, et al., :

Defendants. :

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED this 6th day of April, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00454-CG-B Document 25 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 1