alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

 

I, Sandra G. Sciutto, certify that:

 

6.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of California Coastal Communities, Inc.;

 

7.               Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

 

8.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;

 

9.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:

 

(d)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

 

(e)          evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(f)            disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

10.         The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

(c)          all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(d)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: May 7, 2004

 

 
|   | /s/ Sandra G. Sciutto   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Sandra G. Sciutto       |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### In re Lee A. HOLLAAR and Jeffrey A. Lorenzen.

No. 00-1506.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 5, 2001.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Aug. 14, 2001.

Before MICHEL, BRYSON, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

*Judgment*

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 National City
    Corporation
  Computation
    of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 (Unaudited)
  Year Ended
    December 31(Dollars in
    Thousands)

2006


2005


2004


2003


2002COMPUTATION EXCLUDING PREFERRED
    STOCK DIVIDENDS:Income before income tax expense

$
3,422,636


$
2,965,416


$
4,077,940


$
3,237,466


$
2,168,801Interest on nondeposit interest
    bearing liabilities


1,909,843



1,431,470



697,204



738,085



762,163Portion of rental expense deemed
    representative of interest


53,835



59,190



40,592



37,116



37,544Total income for computation
    excluding interest on deposits


5,386,314



4,456,076



4,815,736



4,012,667



2,968,508Interest on deposits


2,420,316



1,604,601



896,131



891,731



1,148,378Total income for computation
    including interest on deposits

$
7,806,630


$
6,060,677


$
5,711,867


$
4,904,398


$
4,116,886Fixed charges excluding interest on
    deposits

$
1,963,678


$
1,490,660


$
737,796


$
775,201


$
799,707Fixed charges including interest on
    deposits

$
4,383,994


$
3,095,261


$
1,633,927


$
1,666,932


$
1,948,085Ratio excluding interest on deposits


2.74
x


2.99
x


6.53
x


5.18
x


3.71
xRatio including interest on deposits


1.78
x


1.96
x


3.50
x


2.94
x


2.11
xCOMPUTATION INCLUDING PREFERRED
    STOCK DIVIDENDS:Total income for computation
    excluding interest on deposits

$
5,386,314


$
4,456,076


$
4,815,736


$
4,012,667


$
2,968,508Total income for computation
    including interest on deposits

$
7,806,630


$
6,060,677


$
5,711,867


$
4,904,398


$
4,116,886Fixed charges excluding interest on
    deposits and preferred stock dividends

$
1,963,678


$
1,490,660


$
737,796


$
775,201


$
799,707Pretax preferred stock dividends


2,536



2,416



1,208







32Fixed charges including preferred
    stock dividends, excluding interest on deposits


1,966,214



1,493,076



739,004



775,201



799,739Interest on deposits


2,420,316



1,604,601



896,131



891,731



1,148,378Fixed charges including interest on
    deposits and preferred stock dividends

$
4,386,530


$
3,097,677


$
1,635,135


$
1,666,932


$
1,948,117Ratio excluding interest on deposits


2.74
x


2.98
x


6.52
x


5.18
x


3.71
xRatio including interest on deposits


1.78
x


1.96
x


3.49
x


2.94
x


2.11
xCOMPONENTS OF FIXED CHARGES:Interest:Interest on deposits

$
2,420,316


$
1,604,601


$
896,131


$
891,731


$
1,148,378Interest on nondeposit interest
    bearing liabilities


1,909,843



1,431,470



697,204



738,085



762,163Total interest charges

$
4,330,159


$
3,036,071


$
1,593,335


$
1,629,816


$
1,910,541Rental Expense:Rental expense

$
163,136


$
179,363


$
123,005


$
112,474


$
113,769Portion of rental expense deemed
    representative of interest


53,835



59,190



40,592



37,116



37,544Preferred Stock Charge:Preferred stock dividends


1,704



1,616



785







21Pretax preferred dividends


2,536



2,416



1,208







32
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4817 

To facilitate the resolution of a minor boundary encroachment on lands 

of the Union Pacific Railroad Company in Tipton, California, which 

were originally conveyed by the United States as part of the rightof-way granted for the construction of transcontinental railroads. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2004 

Mr. NUNES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Resources 

A BILL 

To facilitate the resolution of a minor boundary encroachment on lands of the Union Pacific Railroad Company 

in Tipton, California, which were originally conveyed by 

the United States as part of the right-of-way granted 

for the construction of transcontinental railroads. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RELEASE OF UNITED STATES INTERESTS IN 

4 CERTAIN RAILROAD GRANT LANDS IN TIP5 TON, CALIFORNIA. 

6 (a) RELEASE OF INTERESTS.—There is hereby re7 leased, without consideration, all right, title, and interest 
2 

•HR 4817 IH 

1 of the United States in and to that portion of the property 

2 located at 615 North Burnett Road in Tipton, California, 

3 which encroaches upon land that, subject to a reversionary 

4 interest, was conveyed by the United States pursuant to 

5 the Act of July 27, 1866 (14 Stat. 292) to facilitate the 

6 construction of transcontinental railroads. 

7 (b) INSTRUMENT OF RELEASE.—The Secretary of 

8 the Interior shall execute and file in the appropriate office 

9 a deed of release, amended deed, or other appropriate in10 strument effectuating the release of interests made by sub11 section (a). 

Æ
#### Thomas S. Morgan *v.*Henry Wood.

Witnesses — Instruction.

A party producing a witness is not allowed to impeach, him by evidence of bad character unless in a case where it was indispensable that the party should produce him, but he may contradict him by other evidence and show that he has made statements different from his present testimony.

Credibility.

It is error for the court to charge the jury that they should dis- ' credit such witnesses- as are without general moral character as shown in the evidence, except where they are corroborated by other evidence.

*779APPEAL FROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT.

October 20, 1876.

*L. P. Little, John H. McHenry, for appellant.*

*Owen & Ellis, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

The party producing a witness is not allowed to impeach his credit by evidence of bad character, unless it is in a case in which it was indispensable that the party should produce him'; but he may contradict him by other evidence, and by showing that he had made statements different from his present testimony. Sec. 66o, Civil Code of Practice.

The appellee produced as a witness his adversary, Morgan, to prove that he had written a letter relied on as evidence in this case. It was not indispensably necessary, nor even apparently necessary that he should have been produced, for that or any other purpose. Yet after he had testified in his own behalf, the appellee was allowed, in the face of the statute, and over appellant’s objections, to attack his character. This was manifest error.

On appellee’s motion the court instructed the jury that they were the judge of the credit to be given the several witnesses, and that they should discredit such as were without general moral character, as shown in the evidence, except so far as such witnesses may stand corroborated by other evidence. This is not the law; the jury may, but is not obliged to, reject the testimony of a witness of bad moral character. The jurors may believe the uncorroborated statements of such a witness, and if they do, they have the right to act upon' that belief, and the "court has no power to take that right away from them.

For these two errors a new trial should have been granted. Judgment *reversed*and cause remanded for a new trial upon principles not inconsistent with this opinion.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Narsi Narayanan, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of ClearOne Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ClearOne Communications, Inc.

| August 15, 2011

By:

/s/ Narsi Narayanan

Narsi Narayanan

 Vice President of Finance

*(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DONNIE SHROPSHIRE, AIS #175941, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-470-CB-N

)

DEBORAH TONEY, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this file, and a de novo

determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is 

made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 

636 is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED in 

part as to plaintiffs’ claims of deliberate indifference to plaintiff’s serious medical need, 

and excessive use of force, and GRANTED in part as to plaintiff’s claims concerning 

exposure to acid vapors as raised in civil action no. 11-304. It is further ORDERED that 

plaintiff’s Motion for Discovery (doc. 37) is GRANTED in part, so as to require 

defendants to supplement the Special Report with witness statements from inmate Jerome 

Fletcher and officer A.L. Ingram. Finally, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion 

to Amend (doc. 39) to add a jury demand is DENIED. 

DONE this the 18th day of March, 2013.

/s/Charles R. Butler, Jr. 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00470-CB-N Document 44 Filed 03/18/13 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements, Form S-8 No. 333-101121 pertaining to the Pactiv Corporation 2002
Incentive Compensation Plan, Form S-8 No. 333-33484, pertaining to Pactiv
Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and Form S-8 No. 333-90333, pertaining
to Tenneco Packaging Inc. Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees of Tenneco Packaging
and Tenneco Packaging Thrift Plan, of our reports dated March 15, 2006, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Pactiv
Corporation, Pactiv Corporation management's assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting of Pactiv Corporation, included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 15, 2006
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Leonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of Morgan's Foods, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended
            February 29, 2004, (the "Report"), which this certification
            accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                             /s/ Leonard R. Stein-Sapir
                             -------------------------------------------------
                             Leonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board and
                             Chief Executive Officer
June 1, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ZERRICK C. ROBINSON, :

Petitioner, :

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0315-KD-C

vs. :

CRIMINAL NO. 12-0090-KD-C

:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

:

Respondent.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been 

no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(l)(B) and dated May 8, 2015 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

DONE this 15th day of June 2015.

s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cr-00090-KD-B Document 123 Filed 06/15/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

<pageID>
I N THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

A PPOINTMENT TO CONTINUING

JUDICIAL EDUCATION BOARD OF

JUDGES :

:

:

:

:

: NO. 977

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIA M

AND NOW, this 30 th day of January , 202 4 , the Honorable Anne Marie M.

Wheatcraft, Chester County , is hereby appointed to the Continuing Judicial Education

Board of Judges for a term expiring December 31, 202 6

.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the undersigned,  Anthony J. Miceli,  Chief Financial  Officer of United Capital
Corp., a Delaware  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby  certify,  to his
knowledge, that:

The  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year  ended  December  31,  2002 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                 By: /s/ Anthony J. Miceli
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Anthony J. Miceli
                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                     March 27, 2003
```
#### Hendricks et al. *v.*The Indianapolis and Shelbyville Gravel Road Co.

Turnpike.—Assessment.—Injunction.—Hopkins *v.*The Greensbuvg, Kingston, and Clarksburg Turnpike Co., 40 Ind. 44, adhered to.

APPEAL from the Marion Common Pleas.

Buskirk, J.

This suit was brought by the appellants against the appellee, to enjoin the collection of assessments against the property of appellants, for the construction of a gravel road.

The injunction was asked upon the ground that the assessors had failed to view and list all the lands within the bounds prescribed by the act of March nth, 1867.

An answer consisting of five paragraphs was filed. A demurrer was sustained to the second, third, and fourth, and a reply was filed to the fifth paragraph of the answer. There was a demurrer to the reply. The court overruled the demurrer to the reply, but carried it back and sustained it to the complaint.

This was error. The questions arising in the record are *563the same as those considered and decided by us in *Hopkins v. The Greensburg, etc., Turnpike Co.,*40 Ind. 44.

*N. B. Taylor*and *E. Taylor,*for appellants.

*J-. T. Dye*and *A. C. Harris,*for appellee.

No useful purpose could be accomplished by again considering at length the questions so fully considered and decided in the above case, and which have been adhered to in many subsequent cases.

For the reasons stated in that case, the judgment in the present case should be reversed.

The judgment is ■ reversed, with costs; and the cause is remanded, with directions to the court below to overrule the demurrer to the complaint, and for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
##### 



EXHIBIT 21




|                                       |  |                      
|-------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Name                                   |  | State of Organization
|                                       |  |                      
|Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.             |  | West Virginia        
|Milan Holding Inc.                     |  | Vermont              
|Mylan Bertek Pharmaceuticals Inc.      |  | Texas                
|Mylan Inc.                             |  | Delaware             
|UDL Laboratories, Inc.                 |  | Illinois             
|Mylan Technologies Inc.                |  | West Virginia        
|American Triumvirate Insurance Company |  | Vermont              
|Mylan International Holdings, Inc.     |  | Vermont              
|Mylan Caribe, Inc.                     |  | Vermont              
|MLRE LLC                               |  | Pennsylvania         

74
#### W. B. Davies *v.*John F. Cantrill.

Appeal — Sufficiency of Evidence.

Where the evidence is conflicting and nearly balanced, the Court of Appeals will not disturb the judgment on the evidence.

APPEAL, FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT.

September 18, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

The answer is, we think, sufficient to raise the issue whether the defendant, John F. Cantrill, Sr., or his son, John F. Cantrill, Jr.; *100executed and delivered the replevin bond to Anderson; and the only other question to be determined is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment refusing relief as against the appellee, J. F. Cantrill, Sr.

*Darnaby, for appellant.*

*Rodman, for appellee.*

The evidence on this question is- so conflicting, and so nearly in equipoise, that this court would not be authorized to disturb- a judgment, if based on the verdict of the jury; and although, in passing on the judgment in this case, we are not governed by the same rules which obtain in jury cases, we ought not to reverse the judgment unless we were satisfied that the preponderance of the evidence was against it. We can not say, as tryers. of this issue of fact, that the weight of the evidence is- against the conclusion of the circuit court.

The judgment is therefore *affirmed.*
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of registration.
 SUMMARY: Johnson Matthey Pharmaceutical Materials, Inc. applied to be registered as a manufacturer of certain basic classes of controlled substances. The DEA grants Johnson Matthey Pharmaceutical Materials, Inc. registration as a manufacturer of the controlled substances.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By notice dated January 15, 2014, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on February 4, 2014, 79 FR 6633, Johnson Matthey Pharmaceutical Materials, Inc., Pharmaceutical Service, 25 Patton Road, Devens, Massachusetts 01434, applied to be registered as a manufacturer of certain basic classes of controlled substances. No comments or objections were submitted to this notice. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Johnson Matthey Pharmaceutical Materials, Inc. to manufacture the basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA investigated the company's maintenance of effective controls against diversion by inspecting and testing the company's physical security systems, verifying the company's compliance with state and local laws, and reviewing the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above-named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances: Controlled substance
ScheduleAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethylphenidate (1724)
IINabilone (7379)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIAlfentanil (9737)
IIRemifentanil (9739)
IISufentanil (9740)
II
 The company plans to utilize this facility to manufacture small quantities 
                    ( print page 73629)
                    of the listed controlled substances in bulk and to conduct analytical testing in support of the company's primary manufacturing facility in West Deptford, New Jersey. The controlled substances manufactured in bulk at this facility will be distributed to the company's customers. Dated: November 25, 2014. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2014-29117 Filed 12-10-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P