alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-09-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                        50,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,549,349
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (200,359)
<INVENTORY>                                      5,287,938
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,252,215
<PP&E>                                          25,741,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (7,683,592)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,284,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,709,229
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,949
<OTHER-SE>                                        (583,393)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,332,532
<SALES>                                          8,048,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,961,471
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,408,411
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,722,771
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,978,448
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,580,546)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            (0)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,686,330)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,580,546)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.32)
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit10.20**

 

**MOCON, INC.**

 

**DESCRIPTIONOF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR****RETIREMENT PLAN**

 

 

In recognition of, and as additionalcompensation for, service on the board of directors of MOCON, Inc., anon-employee director of MOCON who has served on the board of directors ofMOCON for at least five years will, upon retirement, receive an amount equal tothe annual retainer fee such director would have been entitled to receiveduring the fiscal year in which such director’s retirement occurs.  This payment, however, will not be made to adirector who, following his or her retirement,continues to serve as a consultant to MOCON or any of its subsidiaries.  Any amount payable under this retirement planwill be paid as determined by the MOCON board of directors in its solediscretion following such director’s retirement.

 

----
AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed February 27, 2014.

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 1 3
- 0 1049
- CR
JOHN ALCANTAR ALVA , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal Distri ct Court No. 2 Dallas County, T exas Trial Court Cause No. F 11
- 31394
- I 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Lang

- Miers, Myers, and Lewis Opinion b y Justice Myers John Alcantar Alva appeals following the adjudication of his guilt for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. See T EX
. P EN AL C ODE A NN
. § 22.02(a) (West 2011 ) . The trial court assessed punishment at ten years’ imprisonment

. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements o f Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant.- 2

- Appellant filed a pro se response raising several issues After reviewing counsel’s brief, appellant’s pro se response, and the record, we agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/ Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47 131049F.U05- 3

- 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

JUDGMENT

JOHN ALCANTAR ALVA , Appellant
No. 05

- 1 3

- 0 1049

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County , Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F1 1

- 31394

- I ). Opinion delivered by Justice Myers , Justices Lang

- Miers and Lewis participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED

.

Judgment entered February 27, 2014.

/ Lana Myers/ LA NA MYERS JUSTICE
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 12, 2015

No. 04-15-00410-CR

John BELTRAN,

Appellant

v.

The State of TexasAppellee/s

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR7747A

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received 

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellant’s brief 

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to December 7, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Nicolas A. LaHood

District Attorney, Bexar County

101 W. Nueva, Suite 370

San Antonio, TX 78205

Debra L. Parker

111 Soledad St., Suite 300

San Antonio, TX 78205-2321
10903.

#### Wooten *v.*Doss.

Jenkins, P. J.

1. Wooten sued J. L., N. C., J. C., and F. C. Doss, alleging, that he bought certain land from J. L. and F. C. Doss, through their attorneys in fact, J. C. and P. C. Doss, under representations to the effect that the property was free of liens, whereas in fact there existed at the time of the purchase a mortgage lien upon the purchased property, which the plaintiff found it necessary to pay, and actually paid, in order to protect his title; that he is entitled to be subrogated to all the rights of the mortgagee under the mortgage, and he asks judgment against each of the defendants. The record as amended shows that -the mortgage referred to was executed by the said attorneys in fact under an ordinary power of attorney specifically authorizing them, as such attorneys in fact, to execute a bond for title or deed of conveyance to the land mentioned, and to sign receipts for the purchase-money paid therefor. No authority to create a lien on the property is made to appear. Defendants demurred to the suit on various grounds, and upon the demurrer being sustained, the action was dismissed. *Held:*It appearing that the mortgage was executed without legal authority, under the allegations of the petition it did not constitute a valid lien on the property as against the plaintiff, and therefore it was not incumbent upon the plaintiff to discharge the same, as he alleges in his petition it was necessary for him to do. The fact- that, after the filing of this suit, one of the defendants, who had owned an interest in the land, *92signed a cancellation of the power of attorney referred to, in which cancellation he referred to the previous grant of authority as including the right to create mortgages, would not aifect the rights of the plaintiff in this suit, or operate to thus subsequently endow the suit with a' valid cause of action which did not exist at the time it was instituted.

Decided March 18, 1920.

Complaint; from Floyd superior court — Judge Nunnally presiding. August 22, 1919.

*F. W. Copeland, Maddox & Doyal,*for plaintiff.

*W. B. Mebane, Barry Wright, Harris & Harris,*for defendant.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.*
al.

FROAT
OFFICIAL BALLOT A

Allegany County
Maryland

GENERAL ELECTION
LEGISLATIVE SUB-DISTRICT 18
NOVEMBER 3, 1998 _

_

VOTE BOTH SIDES

tere

i
TURN CARD OVER

AND CONTINUE YOTING :

MDi09A 6 - VOTE BOTH SIDES- A

~s*eeeonrew esti BansensesvsReRNBPURRHBNHRBBKeYAKKRRKH HY

Board of Supervisors of Blectlona

TETTTTOT TTT.

--

PROOF 10-5-88
#2 / mj / 62075
h:\MARYLAND\ALLEGANY
<Page>

Exhibit 12
Questar Gas Company
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                            Year Ended December 31,
                                                                      2001           2000            1999
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                                                                (Dollars in Thousands)
<S>                                                                     <C>             <C>             <C>
Earnings
Income before income taxes                                              $39,763         $37,052         $28,231
Plus debt expense                                                        23,777          21,041          20,062
Plus allowance for borrowed
   funds used during construction                                           476             909             358
Plus interest portion of rental expense                                     734             721             647
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                                                        $64,750         $59,723         $49,298
                                                                 ===============================================

Fixed Charges

Debt expense                                                            $23,777         $21,041         $20,062
Plus allowance for borrowed
   funds used during construction                                           476             909             358
Plus interest portion of rental expense                                     734             721             647
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                                                        $24,987         $22,671         $21,067
                                                                 ===============================================

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (1)                                     2.59            2.63            2.34
</Table>

(1) For the purposes of this presentation, earnings represent income before
income taxes and fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of total interest charges,
amortization of debt issuance costs and losses from reacquiring debt, and the
interest portion of rental costs, estimated at 50% for the purpose of this
calculation.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James S. Bain, Chief Financial Officer of MTS, Incorporated, (the
Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this
certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.                                                                                     

|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: December 16, 2002 |  | /s/ James S. Bain      
|                         |  |                        
|                         |  | James S. Bain          
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer

32
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1416 

To amend title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Inspector 

General Act of 1978), to establish a Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board Inspector General, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2023 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code (commonly referred 

to as the Inspector General Act of 1978), to establish 

a Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board Inspector 

General, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Retirement 

5 Thrift Investment Board Inspector General Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1416 IH

1 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF FEDERAL RETIREMENT 

2 THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD INSPECTOR 

3 GENERAL. 

4 Section 401 of title 5, United States Code (commonly 

5 referred to as the Inspector General Act of 1978), is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘the Federal 

8 Retirement Thrift Investment Board,’’ before ‘‘or 

9 the National’’; and 

10 (2) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘the Execu11 tive Director of the Federal Retirement Thrift In12 vestment Board;’’ before ‘‘or the Director of the Na13 tional’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the report of Activeworlds Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sean
Deson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




                             /s/ Sean Deson
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Sean Deson
                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                             Date:  April 7, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| August 9, 2007

  | By:    | /s/                               Brian D. Comer |   |
|------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

          |   | Brian D. Comer

President

 

                                                                                                                                                                    |   |
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-50597

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VICTOR CASTRO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-95-CR-6-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 18, 1996

Before DUHÉ, DEMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Victor Castro appeals his 87-month sentence imposed as a

result of his conviction for being a felon in possession of a

firearm. Castro argues that the sentencing judge exhibited bias

against him and that this deprived him of the due process of law. 

We have examined the record and Castro’s contentions and find no

reversible error.

AFFIRMED.
11471.

#### Doster *v.*State of Georgia.

Decided November 2, 1920.

Condemnation under liquor law; from Barrow superior court — Judge Cobb. February 25, 1920.

*Richard B. Russell, Richard B. Russell Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

W. *O. Dean, solicitor-general,*contra.

Stephens, J.

1. Where a case proceeds to trial against two defendants without objection, and there is introduced evidence by one .of the defendants, and no evidence is introduced by the ’other defendant, the plaintiff is entitled to open and conclude the argument; and an exception by the defendant who introduced no evidence, to a ruling of the trial judge denying him the right to open and conclude the argument, is without merit. *King*v. *King,*37 *Ga.*205.

2. Evidence that an automobile was found disabled and partially wrecked in a public road, that the inside of the automobile was wet and saturated with a liquid that smelt strongly of corn whisky, that there was found near the automobile, on the side of the road under a wire fence, an imprint of a keg, and close thereby in the bushes several kegs were found, one of which contained a liquid, and all smelling strongly' of corn whisky, is sufficient to warrant the inference that the automobile was engaged in transporting intoxicating liquors along the public road, contrary to law.

3. The trial judge did not err in admitting evidence to the effect that, about twenty minutes after the automobile was wrecked, several men came up in another automobile and went into the woods in the neighborhood of the wrecked automobile and found some kegs, which they placed in their automobile and hauled away, and that an hour and a half after the alleged wreck several kegs and a jug which smelt strongly of whisky were found in the neighborhood of the wreck. Such evidence was relevant to the issue and tended to establish the fact that the disabled automobile had been engaged in transporting intoxicating liquor.

4. There was evidence to support the verdict condemning the automobile as the property of the defendant upon the ground that it was, with his knowledge, engaged in transporting intoxicating liquor along a public road in the county, contrary to law.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*
Exhibit 10.1


CONSULTING
SERVICES AGREEMENT


 


Consulting Services
Agreement (the “Agreement”), effective is by and between Sweet Success
Enterprises Inc. (SWTS), with it’s principle office at 1250 NE Loop 410, San
Antonio, TX (hereinafter the “Client”), and Jim Haworth 999 Sunbridge Lane
Rogers AR 72758 (hereinafter the “Consultant”).


 


WHEREAS, Client finds
that the Consultant is willing to perform certain work hereinafter described in
accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, Client finds
that the Consultant is qualified to perform the work, all relevant factors
considered, and that such performance will be in furtherance of Clients
business.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein and intending to be legally
bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1. SERVICES


 


1.1   Services to Client: The Consultant shall
provide the following (“Services”) to Client: Arrange meetings between Client
and Wal-Mart Inc. to allow Client to discuss an agreement to sell Client’s
products.


 


1.2   The consultant will assist the Company in
obtaining additional channels for its products with compensation to be
negotiated on a channel by channel, customer by customer basis.


 


1.3   The consultant will join the SWTS Board of
Directors in January 2006 for a term of two years.


 


2. PAYMENT


 


2.1   Payment for Services: The Consultant will be
paid as follows: 600,000 non transferable options to purchase Clients common
stock, at $.70 per share, upon signing of this agreement.


 


2.2   The Consultant will be paid a 9% cash
commission of the net sales realized by the Client to Wal-Mart for the term of
84 months. These commissions will be paid to the Consultant by the 15th
of the month following the month of Client’s receipt of payment from the Retailer.
SWTS may buy out this agreement after 36 months at three (3) times its annual
revenue from Wal-Mart in cash or stock.


 





















 


3.
FACSIMILE SIGNATURE


 


3.1   Execution and delivery of this Agreement by
exchange of facsimile copies bearing the facsimile signature of a party hereto
shall constitute a valid and binding execution and delivery of this Agreement
by such party. Such facsimile copies shall constitute enforceable original
documents.


 


 


	
  Client: Sweet Success
  Enterprises Inc.

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/ William J.
  Gallagher

  	
   

  
	
  Date:

  	
  11-30, 2005

  	
   

  
			



 


 


Consultant: Jim Haworth


 


	
   

  
	
  /s/ Jim Haworth

  	
   

  
	
  Date:

  	
  11/30/05
EXHIBIT 4.01

 

TERRY L. JOHNSON, CPA

406 Greyford Lane

Casselberry, Florida 32707

Phone 407-721-4753

Fax/Voice Message 866-813-3428

E-mail cpatlj@yahoo.com

 

May 15, 2015

 

Office of the Chief Accountant 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

100F Street, NE 

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

I have read the statements made by Vapor Group Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), which were provided to me and which I understand will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Item 4.01 of Form 8-K, regarding my resignation as the Company's certifying accountant. I agree with the statements concerning my firm in such Current Report on Form 8-K. I have no basis to agree or disagree with other statements made under Item 4.01.

 

I hereby consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the foregoing report on Form 8-K.

 

 

	Very truly yours,	 
	 	 
		 
	Terry L. Johnson, CPA	 
	Casselberry, Florida