alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DONALD EUGENE GARDNER, 

(AIS # 283161),

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION 12-0281-CG-C

)

HEUY MACK, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant 

to the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of 

the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the 

opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that summary judgment is GRANTED in 

favor of Defendants Sheriff Huey Mack, Assistant Chief Deputy of Corrections Dale 

Byrne, Sergeant Melvin Bradley, Officer Anthony Brown, Officer David Aldrete, 

Officer John Rowell, Officer Kendrick McNeal, Officer Joshua Keers, and Officer 

Mark Boyington, and the claims presented by the Plaintiff are DISMISSED with 

prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED this 2nd day of March, 2015. 

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00281-CG-C Document 139 Filed 03/02/15 Page 1 of 1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1449 

To amend the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to increase the frequency 

of lease sales, to require replacement sales, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2023 

Mr. FULCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to increase 

the frequency of lease sales, to require replacement sales, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Committing Leases 

5 for Energy Access Now Act’’ or the ‘‘CLEAN Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GEOTHERMAL LEASING. 

7 (a) ANNUAL LEASING.—Section 4(b) of the Geo8 thermal Steam Act of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 1003(b)) is amend9 ed— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1449 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘2 years’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘year’’; 

3 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as 

4 paragraphs (5) and (6), respectively; and 

5 (3) after paragraph (2), by inserting the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(3) REPLACEMENT SALES.—If a lease sale 

8 under paragraph (1) for a year is canceled or de9 layed, the Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a 

10 replacement sale during the same year. 

11 ‘‘(4) REQUIREMENT.—In conducting a lease 

12 sale under paragraph (2) in a State described in 

13 that paragraph, the Secretary of the Interior shall 

14 offer all nominated parcels eligible for geothermal 

15 development and utilization under the resource man16 agement plan in effect for the State.’’. 

17 (b) DEADLINES FOR CONSIDERATION OF GEO18 THERMAL DRILLING PERMITS.—Section 4 of the Geo19 thermal Steam Act of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 1003) is amended 

20 by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(h) DEADLINES FOR CONSIDERATION OF GEO22 THERMAL DRILLING PERMITS.— 

23 ‘‘(1) NOTICE.—Not later than 30 days after the 

24 date on which the Secretary receives an application 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1449 IH

1 for any geothermal drilling permit, the Secretary 

2 shall— 

3 ‘‘(A) provide written notice to the appli4 cant that the application is complete; or 

5 ‘‘(B) notify the applicant that information 

6 is missing and specify any information that is 

7 required to be submitted for the application to 

8 be complete. 

9 ‘‘(2) ISSUANCE OF DECISION.—If the Secretary 

10 determines that an application for a geothermal 

11 drilling permit is complete under paragraph (1)(A), 

12 the Secretary shall issue a final decision on the ap13 plication not later than 30 days after the Secretary 

14 notifies the applicant that the application is com15 plete.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO
                          BIG DADDY'S AUTO SALES, INC.

         THE UNDERSIGNED, being the sole director and president of Big - Daddy's
Auto Sales, Inc., does hereby amend its Articles of Incorporation as follows:

                                    ARTICLE I
                                      NAME

         1. The name of this corporation shall be Sweets and Eats, Inc.

         I hereby  certify that the  following was adopted by a majority vote of
the shareholders and directors of the corporation on April 19, 2000 and that the
number of votes cast was sufficient for approval.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have  hereunto  subscribed to and executed this
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation this on April 19, 2000.

                                                              [Graphic Omitted]

By: /s/ James H. Bailey
-----------------------
        James H. Bailey, President and Sole Director



                                        The     foregoing     instrument     was
                                        acknowledged before me on April 19, 2000
                                        by James  H.  Bailey  who is  personally
                                        known to me.



                                       By: /s/ Micheal J O'Derrick
                                       ---------------------------
                                               Micheal J O'Derrick
                                               Notary Public
                                               My Commission Expires: 11/11/2003


[Graphic Omitted]
<PAGE>
#### Stivers et al. *v.*McConnell.

*Practice.—Bill of*Exceptions.—Filing.—A statement signed by the judge, in a bill of exceptions, for the filing of which seventy days had been given, that the same was “ tendered, prepared, and signed by the court, within the term, and within the said seventy days given,” did not show that the bill of exceptions was filed within the time allowed.

Same.—Where this court cannot tell from the bill of exceptions whether or not it contains all the evidence, the evidence will not be considered.

APPEAL from the Tipton Circuit Court.

*y. Green*and *D. Waugh,*for appellants.

*N. R. Overman,*for appellee.

Downey, J.

The appellee sued the appellants and had judgment in his favor, after a trial by the court, and when a motion for a new trial had been made by the defendants and overruled by the court. The only error properly assigned is based on the refusal of the circuit court to grant a new trial.

It is impossible for us to tell whether the evidence is in the record or not, for the reason that we cannot ascertain where the bill of exceptions (if there is any in the record) commences ; and after the conclusion of the record, and following the clerk’s certificate, are sundry documents appended, which, so far as we can see, are no part of the record. And again, the clerk nowhere shows when the bill of exceptions (if one is in the record) was filed. Seventy days were given the defendants, in which to prepare and tender their bill of exceptions; and preceding the signature of the gentleman signing himself as judge *pro*tem., it is stated that the bill of exceptions is “tendered, prepared, and signed by the court, within the term, and within, the said seventy days given.’’ This does not show that the bill of exceptions was filed within the time allowed, or that it was ever filed. But if it did, as we have already said, we cannot tell what part of the record it embraces. We cannot, therefore, consider the question as to the sufficiency or insufficiency of the evidence, or whether the motion for a new trial was properly overruled or not.

The judgment is affirmed, with two per cent, damages and costs.
[Exhibit 32.1]

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of BF Acquisition Group
III,  Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending
April  30,  2004  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Colucci,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and
          (2)  The  information contained in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 16, 2004
                                  /s/ William Colucci
                                  ------------------------------
                                  William Colucci, President
                                  BF Acquisition Group III, Inc.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 144 

To amend the provisions of title 40, United States Code, commonly known 

as the Davis-Bacon Act, to raise the threshold dollar amount of contracts 

subject to the prevailing wage requirements of such provisions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. DUNCAN (for himself and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the provisions of title 40, United States Code, 

commonly known as the Davis-Bacon Act, to raise the 

threshold dollar amount of contracts subject to the prevailing wage requirements of such provisions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Adjusting Davis-Bacon 

5 for Inflation Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 144 IH

1 SEC. 2. THRESHOLD OF CONTRACTS SUBJECT TO DAVIS2 BACON. 

3 Section 3142(a) of chapter 31 of title 40, United 

4 States Code is amended by striking ‘‘$2,000’’ and insert5 ing ‘‘$50,000’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 10.9
     Each non-employee member of Golden Telecom’s Board of Directors isentitled to receive an annual retainer fee of $15,000. In addition, eachnon-employee member of the Board of Directors is entitled to receive a fee of$1,000 for each Board meeting attended in person and a fee of $500 for eachBoard meeting attended by telephone. Non-employee members are entitled toreceive a fee of $750 for each Board committee meeting attended in person, a feeof $500 for each Board committee meeting attended by telephone and a fee of $500for each Unanimous Written Consent in Lieu of Meeting adopted by the Board.However, Board committee fees are not paid if the meeting is held on the sameday as a Board meeting. In accordance with the Golden Telecom 1999 EquityParticipation Plan, non-employee directors are also entitled to receive 10,000stock options upon their initial appointment and 2,500 stock options for eachsubsequent year of service.
     The Chair of the Audit Committee is entitled to receive additionalannual compensation of $15,000 for serving as Chair of the Audit Committee.
     Each of the Directors waived his right to receive stock options in 2004with the exception of Mr. North and Mr. Herman. Mr. Dunster also waived hisrights to all forms of Director compensation in 2004, which is in line with thepolicy of his employer, Capital International Research, Inc.
     All directors who are also Golden Telecom employees have waived theirrights to all forms of director compensation for 2004, including rights to stockoptions, which is in line with Company policy.
Exhibit 10.1


 


ATRINSIC, INC.


 


65 Atlantic Avenue


Boston, Massachusetts 02110


 


May 15, 2015


Iroquois Capital Management LLC


641 Lexington Avenue, 26th Floor


New York, New York 10022


Attn.: Mitchell R. Kulick, Esq., General Counsel


 


Re: Amendment to First Amended
and Restated Security Agreement


 


Dear Mr. Kulick:


 


Reference is made to the incremental $50,000.00
loan from Iroquois Master Fund LTD to Atrinsic, Inc. being funded today which will be evidenced by a Secured Promissory Note of
even date herewith. We hereby confirm that “Notes” as defined in the First Amended and Restated Security Agreement
dated December 18, 2014 shall be amended to include all of the notes described on Exhibit A hereto.


 


Except as modified hereby, the First Amended
and Restated Security Agreement dated December 18, 2014 shall remain in full force and effect.


 


	 	Sincerely,	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Edward Gildea	 
	 	Edward Gildea,	 
	 	President	 


 


Agreed to and Accepted:


 


Iroquois Master Fund LTD


 


	By:	/s/ Joshua Silverman	 	 
	 	Joshua Silverman, Authorized Signatory	 


 




    	 



    	 



    

  


Exhibit A


 


Notes Covered by First Amended and Restated
Security Agreement


by and between 


Atrinsic, Inc., Iroquois Master Fund LTD
and Hudson Bay Master Fund LTD


  


	Note
    Date	 	Holder	 	Note
    Amount	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	2/11/2014	 	Hudson
    Bay Master Fund LTD	 	$	87,500.00	 
	2/11/2014	 	Iroquois
    Master Fund LTD	 	$	87,500.00	 
	8/15/2014	 	Hudson
    Bay Master Fund LTD	 	$	45,000.00	 
	8/15/2014	 	Iroquois
    Master Fund LTD	 	$	45,000.00	 
	12/18/2014	 	Hudson
    Bay Master Fund LTD	 	$	75,000.00	 
	12/18/2014	 	Iroquois
    Master Fund LTD	 	$	75,000.00	 
	5/15/2015	 	Hudson
    Bay Master Fund LTD	 	$	50,000.00	 
	5/15/2015	 	Iroquois
    Master Fund LTD	 	$	50,000.00
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1661 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1661

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise taxes 
                              on wagering.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2023

    Ms. Titus (for herself, Mr. Reschenthaler, Mr. Amodei, and Mr. 
  Horsford) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise taxes 
                              on wagering.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Discriminatory Gaming Tax Repeal Act 
of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAXES ON WAGERING.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 35 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to taxes on wagering) is repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022.
                                 <all>
```
README

WEB3.mp4 Example File

The aim of this README file is to describe the illustrative implementation (WEB3.mp4) of the 

recommendations embodied in the NISTIR 8161, "Recommendation: Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) 

Digital Video Export Profile - Level 0".

Why It Was Created

This example file was created to prove NIST’s approach to embedding metadata in MP4 video files as 

required when implementing the recommendations specified in the NISTIR 8161. This file was created 

using an existing MP4 file with an H.264 video stream and embedding related time information into the 

H.264-supported Supplemental Enhancement Information (SEI) messages, which reside in the video 

stream. The Clock Offset data was appended to the end of the file as an XMP packet with the standard 

defined metadata. This example demonstrates that existing structures supported in H.264 and MP4

allow for standard metadata to be included within the file and still provide standard playback 

capabilities.

File Content

The MP4 sample file contains a playable H.264 stream with two embedded SEI messages holding the 

precision timestamp and time source information associated with each frame in the video.

SEI Message: The SEI messages are classified as user unregistered messages and adhere to the standard 

format defined in the NISTIR 8161. These standard messages are embedded in every frame within the 

14 second sample video file. Figure 1 provides the hex view of two sample messages contained in the 

file.

Figure 1 - Hex View of Precision Timestamp and Time Source

XMP Packet: The sample file also contains an XMP packet appended to the end of theMP4 file as 

illustrated in Figure 2. This packet contains the necessary data elements needed to calculated the Clock 

Offset value when exporting a video capture from a DVR system. This allows for embedding additional 
metadata as an XMP packet. The XMP packet contains the data needed for calculating the clock offset

value. The data is placed in the UUID box at the end of the file.

Figure 2 - Hex View of XMP Packet Containing Clock Offset Data Elements

Playability

The sample file was included in the Video Player Software Study described in NISTIR 8172. This proof of 

concept demonstrated that a standard metadata approach would not impact the playability of the MP4 

file. The metadata defined in the profile adds refined evidentiary information to videos recorded by 

video surveillance systems.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.01

                          Commission File No. 1-5492-1



                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


Know All Men By These Presents, that each person whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints John L. Patenaude and Peter C. Anastos and each of
them, as true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, to sign Nashua Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


SIGNATURE                              TITLE                       DATE
---------                              -----                       ----

/s/ Sheldon A. Buckler                 Director               March 21, 1999
------------------------------
    Sheldon A. Buckler


/s/ Charles S. Hoppin                  Director               March 19, 1999
------------------------------
    Charles S. Hoppin


/s/ John M. Kucharski                  Director               March 24, 1999
------------------------------
    John M. Kucharski


/s/ David C. Miller, Jr.               Director               March 19, 1999
------------------------------
    David C. Miller, Jr.


/s/ Peter J. Murphy                    Director               March 24, 1999
------------------------------
    Peter J. Murphy


/s/ James F. Orr III                   Director               March 23, 1999
------------------------------
    James F. Orr III
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

vs. CRIMINAL NO. 13-149-CG

ERICA POPPOFF,

Defendant. 

ORDER

On August 9, 2013, Defendant Erica Poppoff moved to suppress “the 

government’s evidence and to dismiss the charge against her.” (Doc. 15 at 3–

4.) After an evidentiary hearing, the court denied that motion in open court. 

(Doc. 24.) The matter comes before the court on Popoff’s motion to reconsider 

that order. (Doc. 27.)

To start, it is worth noting that the line of cases that deal with 

protective sweeps Popoff cites did not form the basis for the court’s decision. 

Instead, the court relied on U.S. v. Lewis, 674 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2012), 

which held that officers performing a Terry stop on one suspect were allowed 

to briefly detain his three associates “in light of the substantial risks to the 

officers’ safety,” id. at 1309. Based on Lewis, the court found at the hearing 

that a brief protective detention of Popoff was justified under the 

circumstances. Nothing in Popoff’s motion (which makes no mention of Lewis) 

convinces the court that conclusion was in error.

Case 1:13-cr-00149-CG-C Document 29 Filed 08/30/13 Page 1 of 2
2

Nor do Popoff’s other arguments merit reconsideration. For instance, 

Popoff insists that her initial detention eventually developed into an illegal 

arrest. Even assuming that Popoff’s detention did at some point develop into 

an illegal arrest (it didn’t), the evidence Popoff seeks to exclude was obtained 

before that point; Popoff had given her name and offered her I.D. within a 

few minutes after she was handcuffed, well before her protective detention 

even arguably could have morphed into an illegal arrest. Similarly, although 

Popoff argues that she never her gave consent for law enforcement to retrieve 

her I.D. from her purse, the court finds that the evidence admitted at the 

hearing proved otherwise.

Accordingly, Popoff’s motion to reconsider (Doc. 27) is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED this 30th day of August, 2013.

/s/ Callie V.S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cr-00149-CG-C Document 29 Filed 08/30/13 Page 2 of 2
# INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTEXASn^!>%'(OFCRSfV'ALAPPEALS F^B062015 •^beUcosta,Clerk RONALD GENE GRIZZLE, § pro se Movant/Petitioner § § § 

### §. CAUSE

vs. STATE OF TEXAS, Respondent § § § §

Ronald Gene Grizzle, 

### Movant/Petitionerv pro se Ronald Gene Grizzle TDCJ-ID 1935380 3872 FM 350 South 

### Livingston. Texas 77351

VERIFICATION 1, Ronald G. Grizzle, under penalty of perjury sign above to aver 

### my foregoing material statements on 2 February 2015 in Polk Co.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Ronald G. Grizzle, sign above to certify I served a true and 

### correct copy of above document on L. C. McMinn, State Prosecuting Attorney, P.O. Box 13046, Austin, TX78711; and D. S. Hanna, Johnson Co. Dist. Attorney, 204 S. Buffalo, Suite 209, Cleburne, Texas:76033; via First Class Mail on 2 February 2015- 

### [Number To Be Asgig-n-edL 

## COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS FEB 062C;5 MOTION TO SUSPEND RULES 9.3(b) AND 9.4(f) 

### AbelAcosta,Clerk RONALD G. GRIZZLE, Movant/Petitioner, moves the Court per 

### TEX. R. APP. P. 2 to suspend Rules 9.3(b) and 9.4(f), due to: 1. GRIZZLE is indigent, incarcerated, appears pro se, 

### and has no access to copier, stapler, nor binding equipment. 2. The filinq timetable would impose hardship on GRIZZLE were he to hand type or write copy quantities required while also preparing copy for the State's lawyers. HEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Movant/Petitioner moves 

### the Court to suspend Rules 9.3(b) and 9.4(f) and permit filing of only the oriqinal unbound copy in this proceeding. Respectfully submitted,