alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### P. T. Allin, et al., *v.*John Robinson’s Ex’r.

Homestead Exemption.

Two homestead exemptions cannot he claimed in the same real estate.

Owner of Life Estate.

The debtor claiming the exemption must be the owner of the property, including the dwelling house, not a joint owner nor an owner in common with others. The owner of a life estate is entitled to the exemption.

APPEAL PROM MERCER CIRCUIT COURT.

June 28, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

The act.to exempt homesteads from sale for debt, approved the ioth of February, i860, provides that, in addition to the personal property then exempt from execution on all debts or liabilities created or incurred after the first day of June, one thousand eight hundred sixty-six, there shall be exempt from sale under execution, attachment, or judgment of any court, except to foreclose a mortgage given by the owner of a homestead, or. for purchase money due therefor, so much land, the dwelling house and appurtenances owned by the debtor, as shall not exceed in value one thousand dollars. Myer’s Supp., pp. 714, 715.

The debtor claiming the exemption must be the owner of the property, including the dwelling house and appurtenances, not a joint owner, nor an owner in common with others of a farm. Mrs. Mary Robinson, under tire will of her late husband, took a life estate in the whole tract, and is “the owner” of the present interest; she would unquestionably be entitled to a homestead right in the dwelling house and appurtenances, as she is occupying and claiming them as her home. She has not alienated her right therein to her son, W. C. Robinson; he occupies under her, and although it is, or may be in deference to the testamentary request of her husband, still Mrs. Robinson may at any time assert and enforce her right to the exclusive possession and enjoyment of all the land, houses, etc., during her life. And at her death it is not at all certain that W. C. Robinson would be the owner of the dwelling house and appurtenances. He certainly is not “the owner” now. And unless he is the present owner, in the legal and proper sense of the term, *479he cannot be entitled to the homestead exemption; if he is, then there may be two homestead exemptions on the same real estate at the same time, which never was contemplated nor intended by the statute. To the extent, therefore, that William C. Robinson is adjudged to be entitled to a homestead in the one-quarter of the tract mortgaged by him to Alexander and wife, the judgment is *reversed*and the cause is remanded with directions to dismiss the claim of W. C. Robinson for a homestead in the real estate mortgaged by him to Alexander and wife and for further proceedings consistent herewith.

*T. C. Bell, for appellants. Kyle & Poston, for appellee.*
NIST NCSTAR 1, WTC Investigation, Chapter 9, Recommendations 1

Table 9–2c. Organizations Affected by the Recommendations. 

Affected Organization Group Recommendation 

American Concrete Institute 1. Increased Structural Integrity 

2. Enhanced Fire Endurance of Structures 

3. New Methods for Fire Resistant 

Design of Structures 

8. Education and Training 

1, 3, 6, 8, 9, 11, 29, 

30 

American Institute of Architects 7. Improved Procedures and Practices 

8. Education and Training 

28, 29, 30 

American Institute of Steel Construction 3. New Methods for Fire Resistant 

Design of Structures 

8. Education and Training 

1, 3, 8, 9, 29, 30 

American National Standards Institute 5. Improved Building Evacuation 

6. Improved Emergency Response 

16, 20, 21 

American Society of Civil Engineers 1. Increased Structural Integrity 

3. New Methods for Fire Resistant 

Design of Structures 

7. Improved Procedures and Practices 

8. Education and Training 

1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 26, 29, 

30 

American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2. Enhanced Fire Endurance of Structures 

5. Improved Building Evacuation 

6. Improved Emergency Response 

8. Education and Training 

5, 17, 20, 21, 29, 30 

Association of the Wall and Ceiling Industry 2. Enhanced Fire Endurance of Structures 6 

ASTM International 2. Enhanced Fire Endurance of Structures 

3. New Methods for Fire Resistant 

Design of Structures 

5. Improved Building Evacuation 

6, 9, 10, 11, 20 

Building Owners & Managers Association 5. Improved Building Evacuation 16 

Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat 5. Improved Building Evacuation 16 

Department of Homeland Security 6. Improved Building Evacuation 22, 23, 24 

Federal Communications Commission 6. Improved Emergency Response 22, 23, 24 

International Code Council 1. Increased Structural Integrity 

2. Enhanced Fire Endurance of Structures 

5. Improved Building Evacuation 

8. Education and Training 

1, 4, 16, 30 

International Organization for 

Standardization 

2. Enhanced Fire Endurance of Structures 

3. New Methods for Fire Resistant 

Design of Structures 

5, 9, 11 

National Conference of States on Building 

Codes & Standards, Inc. 

5. Improved Building Evacuation 16 
NIST NCSTAR 1, WTC Investigation, Chapter 9, Recommendations 2

Affected Organization Group Recommendation 

National Fire Protection Association 1. Increased Structural Integrity 

2. Enhanced Fire Endurance of Structures 

3. New Methods for Fire Resistant 

Design of Structures 

4. Enhance Active Fire Protection 

5. Improved Building Evacuation 

6. Improved Emergency Response 

7. Improved Procedures and Practices 

8. Education and Training 

1, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 

13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 

19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 

26, 30 

National Institute of Building Sciences 5. Improved Building Evacuation 16 

Society of Fire Protection Engineers 3. New Methods for Fire Resistant 

Design of Structures 

8. Education and Training 

8, 9, 29, 30 

State licensing boards 8. Education and Training 29 

Underwriters Laboratories 2. Enhanced Fire Endurance of Structures 

3. New Methods for Fire Resistant 

Design of Structures 

5, 11
Exhibit 32.2
**Written Statement of the ChiefFinancial Officer****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350**
     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, theundersigned Chief Financial Officer of Whitehall Limited, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBof the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
*/s/ Kay Carter*
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Kof Huntsman International LLC (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Peter R. Huntsman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ PETER R. HUNTSMAN     |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Peter R. Huntsman         |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |
| March 17, 2006       |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000839950
<NAME>NORTH COAST ENERGY 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,302,895
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,226,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    177,638
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,866,260
<PP&E>                                      48,245,848
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,640,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,175,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,083,760
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,438
<COMMON>                                       166,129
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,046,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,175,682
<SALES>                                      2,506,058
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,506,058
<CGS>                                        2,168,364
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,168,364
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (17,712)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             451,904
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (96,498)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (96,498)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (96,498)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
AO 245D (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations (10067)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE

V. (For Revocation of Supervised Release)

THOMAS SPURLOCK

CASE NUMBER: 1:10-CR-00001-001 

USM NUMBER: 11468-002

THE DEFENDANT: Fred W. Tiemann, Esquire 

Defendant's Attorney

(X) admitted guilt to violation of supervision conditions: Mandatory Condition, Special Condition, 6

& 7 of the Petition dated 1/29/2010. 

( ) was found in violation of supervision condition(s): 

Date violation

Violation Number Nature of Violation Occurred

Mandatory Condition Technical

Special Condition Technical

6 Technical

7 Technical

The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 2 of this judgment. The sentence is

imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.

( ) The defendant has not violated condition(s) and is discharged as to such violation(s)

condition.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States Attorney for this

district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution,

costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid.

Defendant's Social Security No.: 1397 

Defendant's Date of Birth: 1972 

Defendant's Residence Address:

Wilmer, AL 

 

Defendant's Mailing Address:

 

 

February 11, 2010

Date of Imposition of Judgment

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

February 11, 2010

Date

Case 1:10-cr-00001-CG Document 10 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 2
Judgment 2

AO 245D (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations: Sheet 2 - Imprisonment

Defendant: THOMAS SPURLOCK

Case Number: 1:10-CR-00001-001

IMPRISONMENT

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be

imprisoned for a total term of TWENTY-FOUR (24) MONTHS .

(X) The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons: that the defendant be

imprisoned at an institution where a comprehensive, substance abuse treatment program is available.

(X) The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

( ) The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district:

( ) at .m. on .

( ) as notified by the United States Marshal.

( ) The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of

Prisons:

( ) before 2 p.m. on .

( ) as notified by the United States Marshal.

( ) as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office.

RETURN

I have executed this judgment as follows:

Defendant delivered on to at 

with a certified copy of this judgment.

 UNITED STATES MARSHAL 

 By: 

 Deputy U.S. Marshal

Case 1:10-cr-00001-CG Document 10 Filed 02/11/10 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements,
Form S-8 No. 333-101121 pertaining to the Pactiv Corporation 2002 Incentive
Compensation Plan, Form S-8 No. 333-33484, pertaining to the Pactiv Corporation
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Form S-8 No. 333-90333, pertaining to Tenneco
Packaging Inc. Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees of Tenneco Packaging and Tenneco
Packaging Thrift Plan, of our reports dated February 28, 2007, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Pactiv Corporation, Pactiv
Corporation management's assessment of effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of Pactiv Corporation, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2007
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Charles G. Cooper, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A of Bay View Capital Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date: May 10, 2005 /s/ Charles G. CooperCharles G. CooperPresident and ChiefExecutive Officer
 34
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magnitude  Information Systems,
Inc. (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2006
(the "Form 10-QSB"),  I, Edward Marney,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, as of the date hereof,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my  knowledge,   that  the  Company's   Form  10-QSB  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information  contained in the Form 10-QSB,  fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  November 17, 2006               /s/  Edward Marney
                                        -------------
                                        Edward Marney
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4813 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pimientos (capsicum anuum), 

prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2004 

Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pimientos (capsicum anuum), prepared or preserved otherwise than by 

vinegar or acetic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PIMIENTOS, PREPARED OR PRE4 SERVED BY VINEGAR OR ACETIC ACID. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 
2 

•HR 4813 IH 

‘‘ 9902.20.03 Pimientos (capsicum 

anuum), prepared or preserved otherwise than by 

vinegar or acetic acid, not 

frozen, in containers holding 

not more than 227 g. (provided for in subheading 

2005.90.50) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2006 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1434 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1434

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require a member of the Armed 
 Forces serving on active duty to receive self defense training once a 
                    month to combat sexual assault.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2023

  Mrs. Luna (for herself, Mr. Moskowitz, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Moylan, Mr. 
 Crenshaw, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Posey, Mr. Fry, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Carson, Mr. 
Steube, Ms. Mace, Mrs. Boebert, Mr. Dunn of Florida, Mrs. McClain, and 
 Mr. Diaz-Balart) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to require a member of the Armed 
 Forces serving on active duty to receive self defense training once a 
                    month to combat sexual assault.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Our Sexual Assault in the 
Military Act''.

SEC. 2. MONTHLY SELF DEFENSE TRAINING TO COMBAT SEXUAL ASSAULT FOR A 
              MEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES SERVING ON ACTIVE DUTY.

    (a) Establishment.--Chapter 101 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 2018. Monthly self defense training to combat sexual assault
    ``One day of physical training each month for a member serving on 
active duty shall consist of self defense training to combat sexual 
assault.''.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Section 2018 of such title, as added by 
subsection (a), shall not be construed to increase the number of days 
of training required for a member of the Armed Forces serving on active 
duty.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                EXHIBIT 19(b)


[LOGO]

The Chase Manhattan Bank
450 West 33rd Street
New York, NY 10001


31-Jan-97

To the Holders of:

Associates Manufactured Housing Contract Pass-Through Certificates,
Series 1996-2

$405,009,244.00 Asset-Backed Certificates

The following information is being provided to you for the calendar year 1996
pursuant to Section 14.10 of the Standard Terms and Conditions of Agreement
effective November 1, 1996. Detailed below are the monthly payment factors (per
$1,000 of original issuance) for interest, principal, and fees and compensation
paid to the Servicer. The information can be utilized for preparation of federal
income tax returns. Should you have any further questions regarding the use of
this information, please consult your tax counsel.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Fees and Compensation
                     Interest        Principal           Paid to Servicer
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                 <C>             <C>                  <C>
November             2.149063        9.338613              0.833333
December             5.328300        9.867567              0.825551
</TABLE>

THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK
as Trustee and Paying Agent
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magnitude Information
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005
(the "Form 10-QSB"), I, Steven D. Rudnik, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge, that the Company's Form 10-QSB fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  August 12, 2005              /s/ Steven D. Rudnik
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                         Steven D. Rudnik
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer