alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11170.

#### Davis *v.*The State.

Decided March 3, 1920.

Rehearing denied April 13, 1920.

Indictment for car-breaking; from Fulton superior court—Judge Ilumpliries. November 15, 1919.

Application for certiorari was denied by tlxo Supreme Court.

*Len B. Guillebeau,*for plaintiff in error.

*John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, E. A. Stephens,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial, not having been argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in'error, is treated as abandoned.

2. There was evidence which authorized the jury to find that the accused had made a free and voluntary confession of his guilt; and other corroborative evidence which, together with his confession, authorized his conviction.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 74766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29392]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--High Density Packaging User Group 
International, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 31, 2014, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), High Density Packaging User 
Group International, Inc. (``HDPUG'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Compeq Manufacturing, Taoyuan, TAIWAN; 
Introbotix, Albuquerque, NM; Freescale, Austin, TX; and Ventec 
International Group, Ward Hill, MA, have been added as parties to this 
venture.
    Also, Enthone, West Haven, CT; IST, Hsinchu, Taiwan; and Park and 
Electrochemical, Melville, NY, have withdrawn as parties to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and HDPUG intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On September 14, 1994, HDPUG filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on March 23, 1995 (60 FR 15306).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 11, 
2014. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on August 8, 2014 (79 FR 46451).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-29392 Filed 12-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000840826
<NAME> DAKA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                           9,083
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                       998
<INVENTORY>                                     10,193
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,477
<PP&E>                                         133,527
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,472
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,391
<BONDS>                                         85,047
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,593
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,706
<SALES>                                        178,888
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               186,051
<CGS>                                          149,748
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  149,748
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,759
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,708
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,051
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,051
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .73
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2
                              CERTIFICATION

I, David T. Nguyen, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of The InterGroup
Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: September 29, 2003                      /s/ David T. Nguyen
                                              ---------------------------
                                              David T. Nguyen, Treasurer
                                              and Controller (serving as
                                              Chief Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Broadcasting Board of Governors

# SUMMARY:

The Broadcasting Board of Governors (Board) will be meeting at the time and location listed above. The Board will vote on a consent agenda consisting of the minutes of its October 30, 2014 meeting, a resolution honoring the 65th anniversary of Voice of America's Ukrainian Service, and a resolution honoring the fifth anniversary of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty's Radio Mashaal. The Board will receive a presentation providing an overview of the International Broadcasting Bureau.

                        This meeting will also be available for public observation via streamed Webcast, both live and on-demand, on the agency's public Web site at                         *www.bbg.gov.*                         Information regarding this meeting, including any updates or adjustments to its starting time, can also be found on the agency's public Web site.                    

                        The public may also attend this meeting in person at the address listed above as seating capacity permits. Members of the public seeking to attend the meeting in person must register at                         *http://bbgboardmeetingdecember2014.eventbrite.com*                         by 12:00 p.m. (EST) on December 17. For more information, please contact BBG Public Affairs at (202) 203-4400 or by email at                         *pubaff@bbg.gov.*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Persons interested in obtaining more information should contact Oanh Tran at (202) 203-4545.

Oanh Tran,

Director of Board Operations.

[FR Doc. 2014-29290 Filed 12-10-14; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Eachof the undersigned hereby certifies, in their respective capacity as an officerof California Coastal Communities, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

•                  the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

•                  the informationcontained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: August 8,  2005 |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
|                        |   |
| /s/ Raymond J.  Pacini      |   |
| Raymond J.  Pacini          |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer    |   |
|                        |   |
| /s/ Sandra G.  Sciutto      |   |
| Sandra G.  Sciutto          |   |
| Senior Vice  President and  |   |
| Chief Financial  Officer    |   |

 

----
#### R. W. Davis *v.*City of Covington.

Cities — Repair of Sidewalks — Liability for Damages.

While it is the duty of a city to keep its sidewalks in repair and free from obstructions, it does not guarantee that they will be so kept at all times, under all circumstances; such city is only liable when it has notice, or when the defect has existed long enough for it to acquire information, and fails to use ordinary diligence in removing the obstruction.

APPEAL FROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT.

February 5, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

Although it is the duty of the city government of Covington to *353keep its sidewalks in repair, and free from obstructions, yet its duty in this regard is not so absolute and imperative as to render the city a guarantor that the sidewalks will be kept clear of obstructions at all times, under any and all circumstances. Before the city can be held liable in a civil action for damages resulting to any person, because of its failure to keep its sidewalks clear, it must be made to appear that the city, after notice, or after reasonable time within which to acquire information, failed and neglected to use ordinary diligence in removing the obstruction.

*W. I.*Dudley, *for appellant.*

*John T.*Harrison, *Carlisle &*Foote, *for appellee.*

Instruction No. 1, of which appellant complains, conforms to this view of the law, and is unobjectionable in its phraseology. It correctly states the doctrine as to contributory negligence in a case where the breach of duty complained of is negative in its character. It is not pretended that the city was an active agent in inflicting the injuries sustained by appellant; and if any act of negligence upon his part operated as the immediate cause of the accident, he cannot recover from the city.

Judgment *affirmed.*
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


          Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
I, the undersigned Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Century Pacific
Tax Credit Housing Fund II (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my
knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ ESSIE SAFAIE
--------------------------
Essie Safaie
August 14, 2002
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 12 - 00175 - CV

Mote Resources, Inc. and John Phillip Mote

v. Charles T. Gardner and Janice Marie Gardner § § § § From the 271st District Court

o f Wise County (CV11

- 06

- 491 ) November 14, 2013 Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston



### JUDGMENT This court has considered the record on appeal i n this case and holds that there was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. We reverse the trial court’s judgment to the extent that it (1) finds that appellant John Phillip Mote individually breached the Settlement Agreement, (2) grants appellees C harles T. Gardner and Janice Marie Gardner the remedy of specific performance of the Settlement Agreement as to John Phillip Mote individually, (3) declares the lease released
as to appellant Mote Resources, Inc. , (4) quiets title as to any claim by Mote
R esources, Inc. , and (5) awards Charles T. Gardner and Janice Marie Gardner attorney’s fees against John Phillip Mote individually . We affirm the remainder of the trial court’s judgment.2

- 12

- 0075

- CV JUDGMENT Page 2 We remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion as to appellees’ remaining pending claims against John Phillip Mote individually

. It is further ordered that appellant Mote Resources, Inc. shall pay all of the costs of this appeal, for which let execut ion issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_________________________________ C hief Justice Terrie Livingston
11575.

#### Stanford *v.*The State.

Decided July 14, 1920.

Accusation of carrying pistol; from city court of Macon — Judge G-uerry, April 20, 1920.

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence demanded the conviction of the defendant and the court did not err in overruling his motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*

*488The accusation charged the carrying of a pistol concealed, and the carrying of a pistol without having obtained a license; and there was a general verdict of guilty. The sole witness was a police officer, who testified, that he came up behind the defendant and collared him when the defendant and others were stooping down in a circle at a street corner, playing craps, and the defendant said “ Oh, Lordy,” and ran his hand in his left coat-pocket; the witness told him to take his hands out of his pockets, and he withdrew his hands, “and in his'hand was a .38-caliber pistol,” which he threw away from him; when he took his hand out of his pocket ,the witness saw the pistol.

*John R. Cooper, W. O. Cooper Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Will Gunn, solicitor,*contra.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KEVIN JEROME JOHNSON, :

 :

Plaintiff, :

 :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-00584-CB-B

 :

PEDEHEL MARTIN, et al., :

 :

Defendants. :

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be

dismissed without prejudice.

DONE this 12th of January, 2010.

S/Charles R. Butler, Jr. 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00584-CB-B Document 5 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 1
11158.

#### INGRAM *v.*THE STATE.

Decided March 2, 1920.

A conviction of carrying a pistol concealed was authorized by the evidence.

Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Oglethorpe — Judge Greer. November 3, 1919.

*8
      *Jule W. Felton, M. Felton Hatcher,*for plaintiff in error.

*John B. Guerry, solicitor,*contra.

Luke, J.

The jury were authorized to convict the defendant of carrying a pistol concealed. The witness for the State testified that the defendant pulled a pistol from his hip-pocket, and that the pistol was concealed. We do not agree with the contention that the evidence amounts to no more than a conclusion drawn by the witness that the pistol was concealed, and that the conclusion was unauthorized. Under the evidence and the statement of the defendant, there is but one verdict that the jury could reach, and that is a verdict of guilty. This case is clearly distinguishable from *Stripling v. State,*114 *Ga.*538 (40 S. E. 733). In view of the note of the trial judge and a reading of the charge as a whole, there is no- merit in the exception to the charge of the court. ,

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
#### DE CARLO et al. v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.

Civ. No. 6855.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

July 9, 1951.

Hymen Schlesinger, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Ernest C. Reif, (Dickie, McCamey, Chil-cote, Reif & Robinson) of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

BURNS, District Judge.

The complaint alleged that an employee of defendant negligently wrenched a shoe off the foot of plaintiff Mrs. DeCarlo, with the result that she incurred both lasting pain and substantial medical bills. A jury whose members were satisfactory to counsel for both sides was impanelled, heard the testimony, and decided in favor of defendant. There was no indication that any of the jury which heard the case was contacted personally before trial.

The instant motion for a new trial, filed by counsel other than those who represented plaintiffs at the trial, seeks to raise the issue whether a jury panel becomes fatally defective if a private investigation agency collects information about the jurors by contacting “friends, neighbors, and relatives” of the jurors. The virtue of such investigations need not concern us. It is sufficient that here absolutely no showing was made that any juror even knew of such an investigation, much less that such knowledge would have affected in any way his impartiality in this case.

*609The allegations of plaintiffs were given full hearing and, even though the evidence favoring plaintiffs was frail, this Court permitted the jury to reach its own conclusion as to the factual issues involved. I am satisfied that plaintiffs had their day in court, and that no useful purpose could be served by taking testimony concerning jury investigations or hearing oral argument in a case where I believe justice was done.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Miller Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2014
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Angelo Napolitano,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated:  May 26, 2015                                                                  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                                      | 
|/s/  Angelo Napolitano                                                                | 
|Angelo Napolitano
        Chief Executive Officer and
        Chief Financial Officer | 



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Miller Industries, Inc.
and will be returned by Miller Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---



Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Cash Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rick L. Wessel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  November 4, 2009

/s/ Rick L. WesselRick L. Wessel
Chief Executive Officer