alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1512 

To allow women greater access to a wider range of self-administered 

contraceptives approved under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2023 

Ms. MACE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To allow women greater access to a wider range of selfadministered contraceptives approved under the Federal 

Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Greater Access to Con5 traceptive Options Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPLICATIONS FOR NON-PRESCRIPTION CONTRA7 CEPTIVE METHODS. 

8 (a) PRIORITY REVIEW OF APPLICATION.—The Sec9 retary of Health and Human Services (referred to in this 

10 section as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall give priority review to 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1512 IH

1 any supplemental application submitted under section 

2 505(b), 510(k), or 515 of the Federal Food, Drug, and 

3 Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(b), 360, 360e) for a self4 administered contraceptive method to be marketed without 

5 being subject to section 503(b)(1) of the Federal Food, 

6 Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 353(b)(1)) or treated 

7 as a prescription device. 

8 (b) FEE WAIVER.—The Secretary shall waive the fee 

9 under section 736(a)(1) or 738(a)(2) of the Federal Food, 

10 Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 379h(a)(1); 

11 379j(a)(2)) (as applicable) with respect to a supplemental 

12 application that receives priority review under subsection 

13 (a). 

14 (c) APPLICABILITY.—This section applies with re15 spect to a supplemental application described in subsection 

16 (a) that— 

17 (1) is submitted before the date of enactment of 

18 this Act and remains pending as of such date of en19 actment; or 

20 (2) is submitted after such date of enactment. 

21 (d) SELF-ADMINISTERED CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD

22 DEFINED.—In this Act, the term ‘‘self-administered con23 traceptive method’’ means a drug or device (as those terms 

24 are defined in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and 

25 Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321)) or combination product apVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:33 Apr 06, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1512.IH H1512

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 1512 IH

1 proved for use under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos2 metic Act (21 U.S.C. 321 et seq.) as a method of contra3 ception that is administered without the intervention of 

4 a health care professional, including the birth control pill, 

5 patch, vaginal ring, or injection, such as depot 

6 medroxyprogesterone acetate. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
*Order Entered June 8,*2004:

#### Krochmal v Paul Revere Life Ins Co,

Docket No. 242776.

The Court orders that a special panel shall not he convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(J) to resolve the conflict between this case and *Guiles v Univ of Michigan Bd of Regents,*193 Mich App 39; 483 NW2d 637 (1992), for the reason that the conflict is not outcome-determinative. MCR 7.215(J)(3)(a).
#### William Murphy *v.*John R. Ashby.

Conveyance of Land — Bond for Deed.

Where a bond for a deed shows a sale of land in gross and not by the acre, the vendor cannot in disregard of the written contract be allowed to show that it was verbally agreed that the purchaser should pay for the land at so much per acre. He is bound by his written contract.

*862APPEAL PROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT.

November 4, 1875.

*W. N.*Sweeney, *for appellant. G. W.*Williams, *for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The bond executed by the appellee for title, as both parties admit, shows a sale in gross, and not by the acre. The appellant agreed to pay $2,000 for the land containing 116 acres, more or less. The deed is for a certain boundary of land, containing 116 acres, for two thousand dollars. The appellee now says that it was verbally agreed at the time of the execution of the deed that this sale in gross should be disregarded, and the writings evidencing the sale held for naught so far as they affected that part of the contract. If written contracts can be assailed in.this way, but little importance is to be attached to this mode of evidencing the obligations of parties.

There is no mistake alleged, or if so, it is not pretended that any was really made, but the appellee is relying solely upon the fact of the verbal agreement made when the deed was signed. The party purchasing had been in possession for several years, with a bond and deed, showing how he entered upon the land, and the terms of his contract; and yet it is insisted that.a verbal contract made at the same time is to determine the rights of the parties. If there had been a deficit in the tract of the nine acres, the appellant would have been without remedy. The production of his bond for title and the deed would have determined his rights, as it must those of the appellee. If this verbal agreement was a part of the contract, it should have been reduced to writing, and neither party is entitled to relief by reason of any excess or deficit in the number of acres in a case like this, unless such deficit or excess is sufficient to convince the chancellor that the parties, with a knowledge of that fact, would not have made such a contract. The judgment is *reversed*and cause remanded with directions to dismiss the petition, and also the cross-action.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summarized financial information extracted from the
Questar Gas Company Statements of Income and Balance Sheet for the period ended
December 31, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
audited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            3326
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    80512
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      22296
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                111039
<PP&E>                                          948280
<DEPRECIATION>                                  382657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  700515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           167988
<BONDS>                                         225000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         22974
<OTHER-SE>                                      204200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    700515
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                476823
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   377927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 41446
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               19792
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  41224
<INCOME-TAX>                                     13816
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              27408
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     27408
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-41542 and No. 333-72036) pertaining to the 1999
Equity Participation Plan of Golden Telecom, Inc. and in the Post Effective
Amendment No. 1 (Form S-3 No. 333-39260) to Registration Statement on Form S-1
and related Prospectus of our report dated March 6, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Golden Telecom, Inc. included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.



/s/ Ernst & Young (CIS) Limited

Moscow, Russia
27 March 2003
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

| | William C. Owens as Chief Executive Officer and President of Owens Financial Group, Inc., the General Partner of Owens Mortgage Investment Fund, a California Limited Partnership (the Registrant), and Bryan H. Draper, as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Owens Financial Group, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (1) the Registrants Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the applicable requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ William C. OwensWilliam C. Owens Chief Executive Officer and President of Owens Financial Group, Inc., General PartnerAugust 11, 2005
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Bryan H. DraperBryan H. Draper Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Owens Financial Group, Inc., General PartnerAugust 11, 2005
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 1.   | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August 16, 2010 | /s/ Joseph D. Reid                                                                            Joseph D. ReidChief Executive Officer |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### In re CUBA GMBH INTERNATIONAL MARKETING CONCEPT (now known as W.O.M. GmbH Innovative Produkte fur Medizin und Technik)

No. 00-1510.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: May 8, 2001.

Before LOURIE, BRYSON, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*804
      *AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
 Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, Zeynep Hakimoglu, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of ClearOne Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ClearOne Communications, Inc.
 
 
 
 Date:  November 16, 2009
By:
/s/ Zeynep HakimogluZeynep HakimogluChief Executive Officer
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1449 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to increase 

the frequency of lease sales, to require replacement sales, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 1449 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Committing Leases 

3 for Energy Access Now Act’’ or the ‘‘CLEAN Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. GEOTHERMAL LEASING. 

5 (a) ANNUAL LEASING.—Section 4(b) of the Geo6 thermal Steam Act of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 1003(b)) is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘2 years’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘year’’; 

10 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as 

11 paragraphs (5) and (6), respectively; and 

12 (3) after paragraph (2), by inserting the fol13 lowing: 

14 ‘‘(3) REPLACEMENT SALES.—If a lease sale 

15 under paragraph (1) for a year is canceled or de16 layed, the Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a 

17 replacement sale during the same year. 

18 ‘‘(4) REQUIREMENT.—In conducting a lease 

19 sale under paragraph (2) in a State described in 

20 that paragraph, the Secretary of the Interior shall 

21 offer all nominated parcels eligible for geothermal 

22 development and utilization under the resource man23 agement plan in effect for the State.’’. 

24 (b) DEADLINES FOR CONSIDERATION OF GEO25 THERMAL DRILLING PERMITS.—Section 4 of the GeoVerDate Sep 11 2014 07:07 Nov 21, 2024 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1449.RFS H1449

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

HR 1449 RFS

1 thermal Steam Act of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 1003) is amended 

2 by adding at the end the following: 

3 ‘‘(h) DEADLINES FOR CONSIDERATION OF GEO4 THERMAL DRILLING PERMITS.— 

5 ‘‘(1) NOTICE.—Not later than 30 days after the 

6 date on which the Secretary receives an application 

7 for any geothermal drilling permit, the Secretary 

8 shall— 

9 ‘‘(A) provide written notice to the appli10 cant that the application is complete; or 

11 ‘‘(B) notify the applicant that information 

12 is missing and specify any information that is 

13 required to be submitted for the application to 

14 be complete. 

15 ‘‘(2) ISSUANCE OF DECISION.—If the Secretary 

16 determines that an application for a geothermal 

17 drilling permit is complete under paragraph (1)(A), 

18 the Secretary shall issue a final decision on the ap19 plication not later than 30 days after the Secretary 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
4 

HR 1449 RFS

1 notifies the applicant that the application is com2 plete.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 19, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
| 1. | The Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March 3, 2011 | /s/ Lee W. Hendrickson                                                                                          Lee W. HendricksonChief Financial Officer |
|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.2

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350**

**(furnished, not filed)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warrior Energy Services Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald Whitter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| /s/ | Ronald          Whitter                                                               |   |   |   |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|     |  

 

 

Ronald Whitter

Chief Financial Officer

May 12, 2006

  |
United States Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

Tennessee

2023

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international 

system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented 

measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, and 

has demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope

Mass Echelon III

25 kg to 1 mg

1000 lb to 0.001 lb

Volume, Gravimetric

5 gal

Volume Transfer, II

5 gal 

1000 gal to 100 gal _____________________________________

Katrice Lippa, Chief

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

(Rev.: September 2021)

Effective Dates: 2023-02-01 to 2024-02-01
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAVID L. JOHNSON, AIS 134016, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CA 11-0228-CG-C

PENTON ASHWORTH, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant 

to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation 

of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated October 1, 

2012 (Doc. 154) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. The motion to dismiss 

filed by defendant James English on September 28, 2012 (Doc. 152) is hereby 

STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD.1

DONE and ORDERED this 23rd day of October, 2012.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 1 The court notes that an amended complaint was filed by the Plaintiff on October 1, 2012 

(Doc. 155), and that Defendant James English filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint 

on October 10, 2012 (Doc. 159) and further filed his answer to the amended complaint along 

with Defendants Penton Ashworth, Roger Marsh and James Pate on October 19, 2012 (Doc. 

164). 

Case 1:11-cv-00228-CG-C Document 168 Filed 10/23/12 Page 1 of 1
#### Commercial Bank *v.*Mary F. Buford, et al.

Sales — Payment.

The evidence was held to show that the owner of the property sold paid the person who sold the same and received the proceeds thereof.

APPEAL FROM ANDERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

June 28, 1873.

Opinion by

J udge Hardin :

The essential question to be decided in this case is one of fact whether the race horses Delman, Onward and Luxonburg were owned in good faith by the appellee, Mary Buford, when they were sold and their proceeds realized by her, or were in fact the property of Thomas Buford, ostensibly claimed and covenanted by her for his benefit and to aid in defrauding his creditors.

Having read and carefully considered the record, and the full and elaborate briefs of the counsel, in which we find the important portions of the evidence on both sides fairly collated and presented, as was substantially done in the oral argument, we can not think it necessary or useful in this opinion to state the evidence or analytically review it. But we deem it sufficient to say that whatever may have been the intention of Thomas Buford in selling his own property to- Alexander and others, the evidence concerning the purchase and keeping of the horses and their ulti*50mate sale by Mary Buford, conducing te> explain the apparent possession of Thomas Buford of the horses, who, though seeming to claim them at times, afterward admitted her ownership of them, in our opinion preponderates over the fact and circumstances proved and relied on to sustain the alleged cause of action, which are wholly inconsistent with the answers of Mary and Tliomas Buford to the plaintiff’s interrogation and the testimony of the latter first taken by the plaintiff.

*Turner, Twyman, Thornion, for appellant.*

*Eginton, for appellee.*

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MARCUS TATE, : 

a/k/a/ MARCUS TAITE, 

a/k/a DRELIJAH MUHAMMAD, : 

AIS # 180664, 

 : CIVIL ACTION 10-00257-KD-M 

Plaintiff, 

 : 

vs. 

 : 

STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., 

 : 

Defendants. 

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the 

issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation 

to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made 

under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and dated July 21, 2010, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this 

Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff=s action be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g). 

DONE and ORDERED this the 4th day of August 2010.

 /s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

 KRISTI K. DuBOSE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00257-KD-M Document 9 Filed 08/05/10 Page 1 of 1