alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### LOCAL 1031, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL, v. HERZOG et al.

Civ. A. No. 3030-50.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

Jan. 18, 1951.

Louis Sherman, Washington,. D. C., for plaintiff.

A. Norman Somers and Norton J. Come, Washington, D. C., for defendants (NLRB).

CHARLES F. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

This is an attempt by a labor union to compel the National Labor Relations Boa-rd to certify the results of an election held, under section 9(c) of the National Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 159(c), to select a collective bargaining representative.

As a consequence of a petition filed in accordance with section 9(c) the N.L.R.B. on July 7, 1949 conducted the election in the plant of the Stewart-Warner Corp., in Chicago, 111. The plaintiff union prevailed in the election by a 1041 to 886 vote. Subsequently unfair labor charges were ■filed with the Board both by rival unions and by employees in the bargaining unit. Because these charges are pending, the Board refuses to certify the plaintiff union in accordance with the procedure under section 9(c). The plaintiff union now brings this action to compel, either by mandamus or by a mandatory injunction, the Board to certify the union as the collective bargaining representative in accordance with Section 9(c). The Board has filed a motion to- dismiss.

The Court sustains the motion to dismiss on the authority of N.L.R.B, v. Minn. *614Mining & Mfg. Co., 8 Cir., 1950, 179 F.2d 323, 325. That case which arose' under the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S. C.A. § 141 et seq., held that it is permissable for the Board to- conjoin representation and complaint cases. There the Court stated, in answer to the objection that the Board had erred in consolidating such cases, “The contention (s) relative to the consolidation * * * are without, merit”. This interpretation has the effect of continuing in full force under the new Act what was regarded as proper procedure under the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq. Under the latter statute it was held in Warehousemen’s Union, Local 117, etc. v. N.L.R.B., 74 App.D.C. 28, 121 F.2d 84, 94, that “Withholding certification pending final action on the charges of unfair practice is in effect, if not in form, a conjunction of the proceedings as authorized by Section 9(c).”

Motion to dismiss granted.
#### F. Montgomery, et al., *v.*William Gardner.

Mill and Mill Seat — Sale of by Parol Contract.

Where a mill and mill seat are not only sold, but three acres of ground surrounding it, “so long as the property was used as a mill,” such mill and mill seat is a part of the real estate, and no action can be maintained upon a parol contract for its sale.

APPEAL PROM NELSON CIRCUIT COURT.

October 1, 1874.

*Muir & Wickliffe, Johnson, for appellants.*

*J. W. Thomas, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

It is maintained Iw the appellants that the mill and mill seat are personal estate, and as such passed by the sale to the appellee.

The mill and mill seat were not only sold, but three acres of ground surrounding it, so long as the property was used as a mill. If a water mill, as we suppose it was, when sold as such, with the mill seat, it must be regarded as a part of the realt}', and no action can be maintained upon a parol contract for the sale of it.

There is no equitable feature in the case that would authorize any other judgment than that rendered disregarding the sale.

The judgment of the court below is *affirmed.*
| 1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  August 9, 2012 | /s/ Joseph D. Reid                                                                                                Joseph D. ReidChief Executive Officer |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                         TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
                              SWEETS AND EATS, INC.

         Pursuant to the  provisions of Section  607.1006,  this Florida  profit
corporation  adopts the  following  articles  of  amendment  to its  articles of
incorporation:

         FIRST: Amendments adopted:

         Article I is hereby  deleted in its  entirety and is amended to read as
         follows:

         "The name of the Corporation is Safe Transportation Systems, Inc."

         SECOND:  The following  amendment to the Articles of Incorporation  was
unanimously  adopted  by the  Board of  Directors  of the  corporation  and by a
majority vote of the  shareholders of the corporation on the 3rd day of January,
2001.

         THIRD: This amendment shall be effective on January 3, 2001.

         Signed this 15th day of March, 2001.


                                        By: /s/ MARK B. GOLDSTEIN
                                        -------------------------
                                                MARK B. GOLDSTEIN, Secretary

STATE OF FLORIDA:

SS:

COUNTY OF PALM BEACH:

         SWORN TO AND  SUBSCRIBED  before me on this 15th day of March 2001,  by
Mark  B.   Goldstein,   who  is   personally   known  to  me  or  has   produced
_________________ as identification and who did not take an oath. D



                                       By: /s/ Angela Warshefski
                                       -------------------------
                                               Angela Warshefski
                                               Notary Public, State of Florida
                                               My Commission Expires: 01/29/2004


[GRAPHIC OMITTED]
<PAGE>
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MICHAEL S. JACKSON, : 

 Plaintiff, : 

vs. : CA 08-0254-CG-C 

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, : 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

 : 

 Defendant. 

ORDER 

 After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed 

relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the 

recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(l)(B) 

and dated May 5, 2010 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. 

DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of June, 2010. 

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:08-cv-00254-CG-C Document 33 Filed 06/08/10 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 240 (Monday, December 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 74156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29272]



[[Page 74156]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[PUBLIC NOTICE: 8972]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Bj[ouml]rk'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Bj[ouml]rk,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at The Museum of Modern Art, New 
York, New York, from on or about March 8, 2015, until on or about June 
7, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including 
lists of the exhibit objects, contact Julianne C. Simpson, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: December 7,2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-29272 Filed 12-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
EXHIBIT 32

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Robert D. O'Donnell and Marie P. Mueller hereby jointly
certify, pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as follows:

      (a)   They are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
            Officer, respectively, of Community Bancorp of New Jersey (the
            "Company");

      (b)   To the best of their knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on
            Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report")
            complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section
            13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (c)   To the best of their knowledge, based upon a review of the Report,
            the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                           Robert D. O'Donnell
                           -------------------
                           Robert D. O'Donnell
                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                           -------------------------------------
                           Title
                           March 30,2004
                           -------------
                           Date

                           Marie P. Mueller
                           ----------------
                           Marie P. Mueller
                           Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                           ------------------------------------------
                           Title
                           March 30, 2004
                           --------------
                           Date

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Community Bancorp of New Jersey
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       68
#### James *v.*McConnell.

*PRACTICE.—Bill of Exceptions.—Time of*Tiling.—Where time is given within which to file a bill of exceptions, and it does not appear that a paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions was filed within the time, it will not be regarded as in the record.

APPEAL from the Clay Common Pleas.

*A. T. Rose*and *T. J. Stephenson,*for appellant.

*W W. Carter*and *S. D. Coffey,*for appellee.

Downey, J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellant, who is a physician, for malpractice in his profession. She alleges that sh'e was sick, that she employed the defendant to treat her, for a compensation to be paid, and that from his unskilful and negligent treatment of her she became salivated, resulting in great and permanent injury to her. After issues formed, there was a trial by jury, and a verdict for the plaintiff A motion for a new trial was made by the defendant, which was overruled, he excepted, and final judgment was rendered against him. Sixty days were given him in which to file bills of exceptions. There are four, bills of exceptions in the record. But it does not appear that any of them were filed within the time limited. They can not, therefore, be regarded as properly in the record. *The Louisville, etc., Railroad Co.*v. *Lafland,*38 Ind. 55.

The questions argued are as to the sufficiency of the evidence, as to instructions given, and as to others refused. The questions are none of them so presented by the record as to enable us to decide them.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
1

The Court assumes without deciding that the appeal was timely filed.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

vs. ) CRIMINAL NO. 05-00206-WS

 )

WILLIE EARL CARTER, JR., ) 

 )

 Defendant. )

ORDER

 This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s appeal of the Magistrate Judge’s order

denying his motion to compel disclosure of the identity of certain informants. (Doc. 373).1

 The

Magistrate Judge’s order may be set aside or modified only to the extent it is clearly erroneous or

contrary to law. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Local Rule 72.3(e). The Magistrate Judge’s order,

(Doc. 294), plainly is neither. The defendant’s appeal fails to identify any reversible deficiency

in that document, and it would serve no good purpose to re-examine herein the defendant’s

arguments on appeal, which were correctly rejected — both expressly and by necessary

implication — in the Magistrate Judge’s well-reasoned order. Accordingly, the Magistrate

Judge’s order is affirmed.

DONE and ORDERED this 3rd day of February, 2006.

 s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cr-00206-TFM-B Document 392 Filed 02/06/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

<pageID>
<PAGE>

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Dale E. Stitt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of North Coast Energy,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:     August 5, 2003         Signed: /s/ Dale E. Stitt
                                         -------------------------------------
                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer and Principal
                                         Accounting Officer
J.

appellate jurisdiction in cases arising in the justice's court"). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and we therefore

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.' Parraguirre

cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge Thomas Gaule Steven Marzullo Eighth District Court Clerk

"In light of our ruling we deny as moot appellant's motions for a stay, filed May 8 and 14, 2015.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) L947A
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Ruby Tuesday, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 2, 2009 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Samuel E. Beall, III, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date: August 3, 2009 | /s/ Samuel E. Beall, III   |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------|

Samuel E. Beall, III

Chairman of the Board, President 

and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Bay National Corporation
(the "Company") certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and information contained in that
Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


/s/Hugh W. Mohler

Hugh W. Mohler
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
March 26, 2003


This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.



                                       87
<PAGE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATIONS of CEO and CFO PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mylan Laboratories Inc. (the Company) for
the year ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:
May 19, 2005/s/ Robert J. CouryRobert J. CouryChief Executive Officer/s/ Edward J. BorkowskiEdward J. BorkowskiChief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished in accordance with Securities and Exchange
Commission Release No. 34-47551 and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 33-54487, 333-51508, 33-64313, 333-51512, 333-27563,
333-63756, 333-81441, 333-63754 and 333-51506 on Form S-8 of Nash Finch Company of our report dated May 12, 2003, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and related financial statement schedule of Nash Finch Company and subsidiaries as of December 28, 2002 and for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 28, 2002, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nash Finch Company for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2002.



Minneapolis,
Minnesota
May 12, 2003

1

---

QuickLinks