alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|    |                                                                                 |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of GP Strategies Corporation; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |
| Date: April 30, 2019    |
|                    |
| /s/ Scott N. Greenberg  |
| Scott N. Greenberg      |
| Chief Executive Officer |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 24, 2014

t0121

Order 

Clerk

January 24, 2014

146521

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146521

COA: 300959

Kent CC: 09-011041-FC

JASON LEE SHAVER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been granted and the briefs and oral

arguments of the parties having been considered by the Court, we VACATE our order of 

September 20, 2013. The application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2012 judgment 

of the Court of Appeals is DENIED, because we are no longer persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. JAC K M AR TIN VOSE, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 15-10120

D.C . No. 4:09-c r-00734-C KJ M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na C indy K. Jorge nson, Distric t Judge , Pre s iding Subm itte d De c e m

be r 9, 2015 ** B e fore : WALLAC E, R AW LINSON, a

n d IKUTA, C irc uit Judge s. Ja c k M artin Vosea

p pe a l s pro se from the distric t c o urt’ s orde r de ny ing his m otion for a

se nte nc e re duc tion unde r 18 U.S.C . § 3582(c )(2). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED DEC 15 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Vose c onte nds tha t he is e ntitle d to a

se nte nc e re duc tion unde r Am e ndm e nt 782 to theSe nte nc ing Guide line s. W e re vie w de novo whe the r a distric t c o urt ha d a uthority to m odify

a se nte nc e unde r se c tion 3582(c )(2). Se eUnite d State s v . Paulk , 569 F.3d 1094, 1095 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). Vose is not e ntitle d to a se nte nc e re duc t i on be c a

use his se nte nc e wa s not “ ba se d on a

se nte nc ing ra

n ge tha t ha s subse que ntly

be e n lowe re d by

the Se nte nc ing C om

m ission.”18 U.S.C . § 3582(c )(2). R athe r, his se nte nc e wa s ba se d on the sta

tutory m an datory

m inim um unde r 21 U.S.C . § 841(b)(1)(B )(vii). The distric t c ourt prope rly de nie d re lie f. 1 Se e Paulk , 569 F.3d a

t 1095-96. Vose ’ s a dditional c la im s do not support re lie f unde r se c tion 3582(c )(2). Se e Dillon v . Unite d State

s , 560 U.S. 817, 826 (2010) (se c tion 3582(c ) doe s not pe rm it a “ ple na ry re se nte nc ing he aring” ). AFFIRM E D.

1 Vose ’ s c o nte ntion tha

t he wa s not subje c t

to thee nha

nc e d m a ndatory m inim um be c a use the judgm e nt doe s not c ite 21 U.S.C . § 851(a ) is una va iling. The m andatory

m inim um is se t forth in 21 U.S.C . § 841(b)(1)(B )(vii). 1 5 - 1 0 1 2 0 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 30, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00181

- CV

Robert CORLEY

, Appellant

v.

Timothy CORLEY , Jason Corley and Century Oaks Land LLC, Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI02547

Honorable Norma Gonzales , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, Robert Corley’s petition for permissive appeal is DENIED, and this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. Costs of

th is appeal are taxed against petitioner, Robert Corley

.

It is so ORDERED on June 30, 2021

.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez

, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of June, 2021

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz , Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      1,810,807
<SECURITIES>                               19,455,232
<RECEIVABLES>                                 391,459
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           31,118,449
<PP&E>                                     41,640,991
<DEPRECIATION>                             13,240,975
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             59,518,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      11,558,912
<BONDS>                                    34,355,613
<COMMON>                                       14,948
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 13,588,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               59,518,465
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           15,663,727
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               8,739,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              824,775
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          2,790,909
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             3,308,062
<INCOME-TAX>                                1,438,847
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,869,215
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                1,869,215
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.95
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BILL KEMP (AIS # 090231), :

Petitioner, :

v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-00745-WS-N

BILLY MITCHEM, :

Respondent. :

 ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the

issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which

objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Petitioner’s

petition for habeas corpus relief is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely filed.

DONE this 3rd day of March, 2010.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-00745-WS-N Document 16 Filed 03/03/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Qwest Corporation ("Qwest"), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of Qwest on Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Qwest. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit to such Form 10-K/A. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Qwest and will be retained by Qwest and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

|Dated: November 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/RICHARD C. NOTEBAERTRichard C. Notebaert
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/OREN G. SHAFFEROren G. Shaffer
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer     

---



QuickLinks
11057.

#### RUSHIN *v.*MASSEY.

Decided March 11, 1920.

The charge of the court should cover the substantial issues made by the pleadings and the evidence; but there was no issue that required instructions such as it was contended the court erred in omitting in this case.

It not being contended in the motion for a new trial that there was any other error of the court, and there being evidence to support the verdict, the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Complaint; from city court of Cairo — Judge Rigsby. September 8, 1919.

*Ledford & Christopher,*for plaintiff in error.

*Ira Carlisle,*contra.

Smith, J.

1. It is the duty of the presiding judge to give appropriate instructions to the jury covering all the substantial issues made either in the pleadings or in the evidence.

' 2. In the instant case the only special ground of the motion for a new trial does not show reversible error. The evidence set out in this exception, taken together with the other evidence in the ease, does not present any substantial issue as to the money taken from the safe of the defendant by Raymond Rushin, the son of the defendant, with the knowledge of the plaintiff. In fact Raymond Rushin’s testimony in the brief of evidence clearly shows that the money which he took from the safe was paid back by charging it to his individual account.

3. There was evidence to support the verdict, and the- court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ANTOINE SPANN,

Petitioner

v.

MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, ET. AL,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 91 EM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2022, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the “Petition for Writ of Common Law Writ of Habeas 

Corpus” and the “Motion for Leave to File Default Judgment” are DENIED.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
                                 NABISCO, INC.
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                     YEAR ENDED
                                                                                                  DECEMBER 31, 1996
                                                                                                ---------------------
<S>                                                                                             <C>
Earnings before fixed charges:
  Net Income..................................................................................        $      17
  Provision for income taxes..................................................................               96
                                                                                                          -----
  Income before income taxes..................................................................              113
  Interest expense............................................................................              329
  Interest portion of rental expense..........................................................               26
                                                                                                          -----
Earnings before fixed charges.................................................................        $     468
                                                                                                          -----
                                                                                                          -----
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense............................................................................        $     329
  Interest portion of rental expense..........................................................               26
  Capitalized interest........................................................................               15
                                                                                                          -----
    Total fixed charges.......................................................................        $     370
                                                                                                          -----
                                                                                                          -----
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges............................................................              1.3
                                                                                                          -----
                                                                                                          -----
</TABLE>
#### Calvin BOLDING, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony C. NEWLAND; et al., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-15877.

D.C. No. CV-99-2317-WBS.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2001.1

Decided May 21, 2001.

Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *Sea*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

This appeal from a preliminary injunction comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. Because the district court’s ninety-day preliminary injunction has expired and requested medical care was provided to the appellee, the appeal is moot. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3626(a)(2) (preliminary injunction issued under this section expires within 90 days); *see also University of Texas v. Camenisch,*451 U.S. 390, 398, 101 S.Ct. 1830, 68 L.Ed.2d 175 (1981) (whether a preliminary injunction should have been issued is moot where its essential terms have been carried out); *Cammermeyer v. Perry,*97 F.3d 1235, 1238 (9th Cir.1996) (the “capable of repetition yet evading review” exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply).

DISMISSED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

    KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

    WHEREAS, U S WEST Communications, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the
"Company"), proposes to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under
the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an annual
report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999; and

    WHEREAS, each of the undersigned is an Officer, Director, or both, of the
Company and holds the office or offices indicated below his or her name;

    NOW THEREFORE, each of the undersigned constitutes and appoints ALLAN R.
SPIES and THOMAS O. MCGIMPSEY, and each of them, as attorney for him or her and
in his or her name, place, and stead, and in his or her capacity as an Officer
or Director of the Company, to execute and file such annual report, and
thereafter to execute and file any amendment or amendments thereto on Form 10-K,
hereby giving and granting to said attorneys full power and authority to do and
perform all and every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be
done in and about the premises as fully, to all intents and purposes, as he
might or could do if personally present at the doing thereof, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorneys may or shall lawfully do, or cause to be
done, by virtue hereof.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Power of
Attorney this 4th day of February 2000.

<TABLE>
<S>                                                    <C>  <C>
                                                       By:           /s/ SOLOMON D. TRUJILLO
                                                            -----------------------------------------
                                                                       Solomon D. Trujillo
                                                            PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                                                                             DIRECTOR

                                                       By:              /s/ ALLAN R. SPIES
                                                            -----------------------------------------
                                                                          Allan R. Spies
                                                            VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                                                           AND DIRECTOR

                                                       By:             /s/ JANET K. COOPER
                                                            -----------------------------------------
                                                                         Janet K. Cooper
                                                            VICE PRESIDENT--FINANCE AND CONTROLLER AND
                                                                             DIRECTOR
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Theater Xtreme Entertainment Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Theresa Q. Hoffmann, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: September 22, 2008





/s/ Theresa Q. Hoffmann

Theresa Q. Hoffmann,

Chief Financial Officer
SAMPLE BALLOT RUTHERFORD COUNTY, NC GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
consolidated  financial  statements  found on the  Annual  Report on Form  10-K,
December  31,  1996,  and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference  to such
financial statements

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         1,149
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                   76
<INVENTORY>                                    14,362
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               23,995
<PP&E>                                         12,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,978
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 38,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,844
<BONDS>                                        12,744
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       104
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   38,890
<SALES>                                        47,362
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               47,362
<CGS>                                          41,501
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  41,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             948
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,398)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,759)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,639)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,639)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.54)
        


</TABLE>