alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1615 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1615

        To prohibit the use of Federal funds to ban gas stoves.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2023

Mr. Armstrong introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To prohibit the use of Federal funds to ban gas stoves.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gas Stove Protection and Freedom 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Consumer 
        Product Safety Commission.
            (2) Gas stove.--The term ``gas stove'' means any gas range, 
        gas stove, or household cooking gas appliance that meets the 
        standard set forth in American National Standards Institute 
        (ANSI) Z21.1/ CSA Z21.1 or any successor standard.
            (3) Substantially increase the average price of gas 
        stoves.--The term ``substantially increase the average price of 
        gas stoves'' means that the average price of a gas stove, 
        annualized over its expected life, would likely be 
        substantially higher than the average spending by United States 
        homeowners on cooking stoves and ovens based on the most recent 
        data for consumer expenditures reported by the Bureau of Labor 
        Statistics.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON CPSC BANNING GAS STOVES.

    No Federal funds may be used by the Commission to regulate a gas 
stove as a banned hazardous product under section 8 of the Consumer 
Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2057) or to impose or enforce any 
consumer product safety standard or rule on gas stoves under section 7 
or 9 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 2056 or 2058) that would otherwise result 
in a prohibition on the use or sale of gas stoves in the United States 
or would otherwise substantially increase the average price of gas 
stoves in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 244 (Friday, December 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 75800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29700]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-612-000]


Moore Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Moore Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application 
includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is January 2, 2015.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a7e1e2f5e4e8c9cbcec9c2f4d2d7d7c8d5d3e7c1c2d5c489c0c8d1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="feb8bbacbdb1909297909bad8b8e8e918c8abe989b8c9dd0999188">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 12, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29700 Filed 12-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS,
               CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND
               NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
               AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
               FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                            25,556
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     28,604
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                      287,088
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 361,517
<PP&E>                                           212,642
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   625,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            217,557
<BONDS>                                          289,931
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               6
<OTHER-SE>                                       136,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     625,755
<SALES>                                          587,109
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 587,109
<CGS>                                            403,540
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    403,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 164,749
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 9,283
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    2,537
<INCOME-TAX>                                       1,959
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  578
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                         578
<EPS-BASIC>                                     578.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     578.16


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Paul K. Danner, the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer and Scott L. Vining, the
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer of Paragon Financial Corporation (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certify that, to the best of our knowledge:



| | (i) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the financial statements and disclosures contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: April 14, 2005



/s/ PAUL K. DANNERPaul K. Danner,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer/s/ SCOTT L. VININGScott L. ViningChief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary (Principal Accounting Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 24.1
 
 
  th
 /s/ Jon E. Barfield
    
    DirectorJon E. Barfield/s/ James S. Broadhurst
    
    DirectorJames S. Broadhurst/s/ Christopher M. Connor
    
    DirectorChristopher M. Connor/s/ Bernadine P. Healy, M.D.
    
    DirectorBernadine P. Healy, M.D./s/ Allen H. Koranda
    
    DirectorAllen H. Koranda/s/ Michael B. McCallister
    
    DirectorMichael B. McCallister
 1




---



##### 



/s/ Paul A. Ormond
    
    DirectorPaul A. Ormond/s/ Peter E. Raskind
    
    Chief Executive Officer and
President and DirectorPeter E. Raskind
    
    (Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Gerald L. Shaheen
    
    DirectorGerald L. Shaheen/s/ Jerry Sue Thornton, Ph. D.
    
    DirectorJerry Sue Thornton, Ph.D./s/ Morry Weiss
    
    DirectorMorry Weiss
 th
 /s/ Jeffrey D. Kelly
    
    Vice Chairman and Chief Financial
Officer and Director(Principal Financial Officer)Jeffrey D. Kelly 2
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 2-88669, No. 33-1 3995, No. 33-67940, No. 33-72438
and No. 333-06025) of Nashua Corporation of our report dated February 5, 1999,
appearing on page 35 of the Annual Report to Stockholders which is incorporated
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears in
this Form 10-K.






Boston, Massachusetts
March 29, 1999
<PAGE>
CORESTATES FINANCIAL CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 12.2

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
TO FIXED CHARGES OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS

COMBINED CORESTATES (PARENT ONLY) AND CORESTATES CAPITAL CORPORATION

Twelve Months Ended December 31, 1996
-------------------------------------
(in thousands)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
   <S>                                                                                   <C> 
   1. Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed income
      of subsidiaries...........................................................             $591,887
   
   2. Fixed charges - interest expense, amortization of debt
      issuance costs and one-third of rental expenses, net of
      income from subleases.....................................................             $202,422
                                                                                             --------

   3. Income before taxes and equity in undistributed income of
      subsidiaries, plus fixed charges..........................................             $794,309
                                                                                             ========
    
   4.Ratio of earnings (as defined) to fixed charges (line 3/line 2)...........               3.92x
                                                                                              =====  
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                  DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                            4066000
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    30541000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                                      21479000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 59694000
<PP&E>                                                           58183000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   41639000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   86047000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            24367000
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                        176000
<COMMON>                                                          2586000
<OTHER-SE>                                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     86047000
<SALES>                                                         142892000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                142892000
<CGS>                                                            81521000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    81521000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 466000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   2752000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      1474000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               1278000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      1278000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                         .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         .47
        

</TABLE>
#### Dunlap Howe’s G’d’n *v.*John Darnell, et al.

Agency — Evidence.

The mere fact that one who is a son-in-law sometimes transacts business for his father-in-law is not sufficient to raise an inference that an agreement for forbearance made by him was in fact made as the agent of the father-in-law who owned the note.

APPEAL FROM FLEMING CIRCUIT COURT.

December 19, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Coeer:

The only question in this record in airy way affecting the merits of the case, is whether an agreement for forbearance was actually made by any one having authority to make it. If any such agreement was made at all, it was made b}>' Gotherman with Dr. Yantis, who had no interest in the note, and whose agreement, if binding, must be binding on the ground that he was the agent of Howe, and as such had authority to make the agreement.

.Yantis is Howe’s son-in-law, and sometimes attended to business for him, and had the note in his possession, and left it with D. Wilson & Company, bankers, for collection, or for the payment of the interest, and to be sued on unless the interest was paid. v

If it be conceded that Yantis did make the alleged agreement with Gotherman to forbear to sue, if interest, at the rate of 10 per cent, was paid up to date, and also, that such an agreement, if made by Howe, or bjr Yantis, with authority from Howe, would, if made without the assent of the appellees, have released them, we are still of opinion that the court erred in dismissing appellant’s petition as-to them, because there is, in our opinion, no sufficient evidence that Yantis had authority to make the agreement.

There is no proof or attempt to prove express authority to Yantis. to make the agreement; and if he had authority it must be inferred *271from the fact that he was Howe’s son-in-law, and sometimes transacted business for him, and had this particular note in his hands for collection, and that his act in receiving the money from Gotherman was ratified by Howe. The only legitimate inference from the facts that Yantis had the note and that Howes ratified the collection made by him, is that he had authority to collect the whole or any part of the note. It would be going too far to presume from the fact that Yantis was the son-in-law, and sometimes transacted business for Howe, without any evidence as to the kind of business, that he had authority to make the alleged agreement. This conclusion on the facts, renders it unnecessary that we should consider other questions made by the appellants.

*William S. Botts, for appellant.*

*E. C. Phister, for appellees.*

The judgment dismissing the petition as to the appellees, Harper and Darnall, is *reversed,*and the cause is remanded with directions to render judgment against them for the amount of the note, subject to an additional credit for $20.60, as of date January 31, 1872, being the excess they paid over legal interest to that date.
#### James Walsh v. James M. Powers.

Damages — Pleading—Proof.

Unless plaintiff seeks to recover punitive damages, it is not necessary to prove that the injury complained of was inflicted either purposely or wantonly.

Pleading.

In actions for injuries to the person neither motive, interest nor the circumstances under which the injury was inflicted need be pleaded.

Pleading.

In actions for injuries to person an averment of the extent of the injury and the manner of its infliction is sufficient.

APPEAL PROM OWEN CIRCUIT COURT.

January 11, 1876.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

It was not necessary in this case to order or prove that the injury complained of was inflicted either purposely or wantonly, unless the complainant desired to recover punitive damages; and even in that view, proof of circumstances of aggravation would have been sufficient, upon a simple averment of negligence.

In actions for injuries to the person, neither motive, interest, nor the circumstances under which the injury was inflicted need be stated. An allegation of the extent of the injury, and the manner of its infliction is sufficient, and when it is the result of negligence or carelessness the charge is sufficient if made in general terms. *Louisville, Cincinnati & Lexington R. Co. v. Case’s Admr.,*9 Bush 728; 1 Chitty’s Pleading 388; 2 Ib. 650; *Chiles v. Drake,*2 Met. 146.

*577*J. D. Lillard, for appellant.*

*A. P. Grover, H. P. Montgomery, for appellee.*

Instruction No. 2 correctly defines the rule by which proper compensation is to be determined in such a case as this. *Louisville, Cincinnati & Lexington R. Co. v. Case’s Admr.,*9 Bush 728. The instruction asked by appellant was properly refused. Admitting his entire innocence of an intention to injure the appellee, yet as he acted negligently, he must compensate the latter for the injury resulting from such negligence.

Judgment *affirmed.*
<PAGE>

                   EXHIBIT 32.2 -- SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew A. Campbell, certify that:

     (1) the Form 10-K of Pactiv Corporation for the period ended December 31,
         2005, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of sec.13(a)
         or sec.15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Pactiv Corporation for the period then ended.

/s/ ANDREW A. CAMPBELL
------------------------------------------------------
Andrew A. Campbell
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

March 16, 2006
------------------------------------------------------
Date

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the report of Gaiam, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lynn Powers, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date:March 11, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the report of Activeworlds Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sean Deson, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                             /s/ Sean Deson
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Sean Deson
                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Date: March 29, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.