Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 235 / Monday, December 8, 2014 / Notices 72699 

Survey of Farmed Lands by Underwood 

Engineering Inc., signed September 16, 

2013, and shown as Parcel B and is 

described as follow: 

BEGINNING at the northerly corner of 

PARCEL B. Said point of beginning 

hereinafter referred as ‘‘Corner No. 1 of 

Parcel B’’ for this description. From said 

point of beginning of Parcel B the center 

one quarter (1⁄4) section corner bears N. 

2°21′17′′ E., a distance of 364.11 feet. 

THENCE, S. 2°21′17′′ W., a distance of 

449.78 feet to corner No. 2 of Parcel B; 

THENCE, S. 81°51′43′′ W., a distance 

of 122.42 feet to corner No. 3 of Parcel 

B; 

THENCE, N. 16°39′35′′ E., a distance 

of 487.18 feet to the POINT OF 

BEGINNING OF PARCEL B containing 

0.62 acres of land. 

The area described (Parcels A and B) 

in aggregate is 4.12 acres. 

The applicable regulation at 43 CFR 

2920.5–4(b) provides that, ‘‘land use 

authorizations may be offered on a 

negotiated, non-competitive basis, 

when, in the judgment of the authorized 

officer equities, such as prior use of the 

lands, exist, no competitive interest 

exists or where competitive bidding 

would represent unfair competitive and 

economic disadvantage to the originator 

of the unique land use concept.’’ Based 

on past use of the subject parcels for the 

establishment of pecan trees owned by 

Winder Farm, it is the authorized 

officer’s decision to offer the proposed 

agricultural lease to Winder Farm on a 

non-competitive basis because 

competitive bidding would represent an 

unfair competitive and economic 

disadvantage to Winder Farm. As noted 

above, Winder Farms’ use of the parcels 

constituted an inadvertent trespass that 

they discovered and subsequently 

reported to the BLM. Winder Farms has 

since worked with the BLM to resolve 

the trespass. Subsequent to the BLM’s 

receipt of an application for leasing by 

Winder Farm that complies with all 

applicable requirements set forth at 43 

CFR 2920.5, processing of the proposed 

lease will take place in accordance with 

43 CFR 2920.6, and other applicable 

regulations. Information and 

documentation regarding processing of 

the lease application is available as 

described in ADDRESSES, above, and 

reference should be made to National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 

analysis, to be conducted under DOI– 

BLM–NM–L000–2014–0168–EA. No 

final decision on the lease will be made 

until all required analyses are 

completed. If authorized, the lease 

would be subject to provisions of 

FLPMA and all applicable regulations of 

the Secretary of the Interior, including, 

but not limited to, 43 CFR part 2920, 

and to valid existing rights. 

Public comments regarding the 

proposed lease may be submitted in 

writing—see ADDRESSES above—on or 

before January 22, 2015. Comments 

received in electronic form, such as 

email or fax, will not be considered. 

Any adverse comments regarding the 

proposed lease will be reviewed by the 

BLM State Director or another 

authorized official of the Department of 

the Interior, who may sustain, vacate, or 

modify this realty action in whole or in 

part. In the absence of timely filed 

objections, this realty action will 

become the final determination of the 

Department of the Interior. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

(Authority: 43 CFR 2920.4) 

Michael H. Tupper, 

Deputy State Director, Lands and Minerals. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28687 Filed 12–5–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–FB–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–482–484 and 

731–TA–1191–1194 (Final) (Remand)] 

Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel 

Pipe From India, Oman, the United 

Arab Emirates, and Vietnam 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of remand proceedings. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) hereby 

gives notice of the court-ordered remand 

of its final determinations in the 

countervailing duty investigations of 

circular welded carbon-quality steel 

pipe (‘‘CWP’’) from India, Oman, and 

the United Arab Emirates (‘‘UAE’’) and 

the antidumping duty investigations of 

CWP from India, Oman, the UAE, and 

Vietnam. For further information 

concerning the conduct of these remand 

proceedings and rules of general 

application, consult the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 

201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 

201), and part 207, subpart A (19 CFR 

part 207). 

DATES: Effective Dates: December 8, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Doug Corkran (202–205–3057), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov). The public record of 

Investigation Nos. 701–TA–482–484 and 

731–TA–1191–1194 (Final) may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background: In November 2012, the 

Commission determined by a vote of 

four to two that an industry in the 

United States was not materially injured 

or threatened with material injury by 

reason of imports of CWP from India, 

Oman, the UAE, and Vietnam that were 

sold in the United States at less than fair 

value and that were subsidized by the 

Governments of India, Oman, and the 

UAE. Petitioners and domestic 

producers contested the Commission’s 

determinations before the U.S. Court of 

International Trade (‘‘CIT’’). The CIT 

remanded certain issues to the 

Commission and affirmed all other 

aspects of the Commission’s 

determinations. JMC Steel Group v. 

United States, Slip. Op. 14–120 (Ct. Int’l 

Trade Oct. 15, 2014). 

Participation in the proceeding: Only 

those persons who were interested 

parties that participated in the 

investigations (i.e., persons listed on the 

Commission Secretary’s service list) and 

also parties to the appeal may 

participate in the remand proceedings. 

Such persons need not make any 

additional filings with the Commission 

to participate in the remand 

proceedings, unless they are adding new 

individuals to the list of persons 

entitled to receive business proprietary 

information (‘‘BPI’’) under 

administrative protective order. BPI 

referred to during the remand 

proceedings will be governed, as 

appropriate, by the administrative 

protective order issued in the 

investigations. The Secretary will 

maintain a service list containing the 

names and addresses of all persons or 

their representatives who are parties to 

the remand proceedings, and the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

72700 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 235 / Monday, December 8, 2014 / Notices 

Secretary will maintain a separate list of 

those authorized to receive BPI under 

the administrative protective order 

during the remand proceedings. 

Written Submissions: The 

Commission is not reopening the record 

and will not accept the submission of 

new factual information for the record. 

The Commission will permit the parties 

to file comments concerning how the 

Commission could best comply with the 

Court’s remand instructions. 

The comments must be based solely 

on the information in the Commission’s 

record. The Commission will reject 

submissions containing additional 

factual information or arguments 

pertaining to issues other than those on 

which the Court has remanded this 

matter. The deadline for filing 

comments is December 24, 2014. 

Comments shall be limited to no more 

than twenty (20) double-spaced and 

single-sided pages of textual material. 

Parties are advised to consult with the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subpart A (19 CFR part 207) for 

provisions of general applicability 

concerning written submissions to the 

Commission. All written submissions, 

including those that contain BPI, must 

conform to the Commission’s rules. 

Please be aware that the Commission’s 

rules with respect to electronic filing 

have been amended. The amendments 

took effect on November 7, 2011. See 76 

FR 61937 (Oct. 6, 2011) and the newly 

revised Commission Handbook on EFiling, available on the Commission’s 

Web site at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

Additional written submissions to the 

Commission, including requests 

pursuant to section 201.12 of the 

Commission’s rules, shall not be 

accepted unless good cause is shown for 

accepting such submissions or unless 

the submission is pursuant to a specific 

request by a Commissioner or 

Commission staff. 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, 

each document filed by a party to the 

investigation must be served on all other 

parties to the investigation (as identified 

by either the public or BPI service list), 

and a certificate of service must be 

timely filed. The Secretary will not 

accept a document for filing without a 

certificate of service. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 3, 2014. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28679 Filed 12–5–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–895] 

Certain Multiple Mode Outdoor Grills 

and Parts Thereof; Commission’s 

Determination To Review-In-Part a 

Final Initial Determination Finding a 

Violation of Section 337; Schedule for 

Filing Written Submissions on the 

Issues Under Review and on Remedy, 

the Public Interest and Bonding 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined to reviewin-part the final initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) issued by the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on 

September 26, 2014, finding a violation 

of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in this 

investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2392. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on September 26, 2013, based on a 

complaint filed on behalf of A&J 

Manufacturing, LLC of St. Simons, 

Georgia and A&J Manufacturing, Inc. of 

Green Cove Springs, Florida 

(collectively, ‘‘A&J’’ or 

‘‘Complainants’’). 78 FR 59373 (Sept. 

26, 2013). The complaint alleged 

violations of Section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, in the sale for importation, 

importation, or sale within the United 

States after importation of certain 

multiple mode outdoor grills and parts 

thereof by reason of infringement of 

certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 

8,381,712, U.S. Patent No. D660,646, 

and U.S. Patent No. D662,773 patent. 

The Commission’s notice of 

investigation, as amended, named 

numerous respondents including: The 

Brinkmann Corporation (‘‘Brinkmann’’); 

Academy Ltd., d/b/a Academy Sports + 

Outdoors (‘‘Academy’’); Ningbo Huige 

Outdoor Products Co. (‘‘Huige’’); CharBroil, LLC (‘‘Char-Broil’’); Zhejiang 

Fudeer Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Fudeer’’); Outdoor Leisure Products, 

Incorporated (‘‘OLP’’); Dongguan 

Kingsun Enterprises Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Kingsun’’); and Keesung 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (‘‘Keesung’’) 

(collectively ‘‘the Respondents’’). The 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations 

(OUII) is also a party to this 

investigation. 

On June 24, 2014, the Commission 

affirmed-in-part and vacated-in-part an 

initial determination granting-in-part a 

motion for summary determination of 

non-infringement filed by Char-Broil, 

Fudeer, OLP, Kingsun, Tractor Supply 

Co. (‘‘TSC’’), and Chant Kitchen 

Equipment (HK) Ltd. (‘‘Chant’’). The 

Commission found that Complainants 

admit that the following redesigned 

grills do not infringe the ’712 patent: (1) 

Chant/Tractor Supply’s New Model 

1046761; (2) Rankam’s Member’s Mark 

Grill, Model No. GR2071001–MM (Ver. 

2) and (3) Rankam’s Smoke Canyon 

Grill, Model No. GR2034205–SC (Ver. 

2). Comm’n Op. at 1 (Jun. 24, 2014). The 

Commission found the other redesigned 

products at issue were within the scope 

of the investigation. Id. The Commission 

adopted the ALJ’s construction of the 

‘‘openable [] cover’’ limitations of 

claims 1 and 17 on modified grounds. 

Id. The Commission affirmed the ALJ’s 

finding of non-infringement of claims 1 

and 17 for the Char-Broil Oklahoma Joe 

Longhorn Model 12210767 Grill and 

adopted the ALJ’s findings that the 

redesigned grills do not infringe claims 

1 and 17 on modified grounds. Id. The 

Commission also found that the 

‘‘openable [] cover means’’ limitations of 

claim 10 are means-plus-function 

limitations and directed the ALJ to make 

findings consistent with its means-plusfunction interpretation. Id. at 2. 

On September 26, 2014, the ALJ 

issued the final ID, finding a violation 

of section 337 as to Respondents 

Brinkmann, OLP, Kingsun, Academy, 

and Huige based upon his 

determinations: (i) That certain, but not 

all, accused products infringe at least 

one claim of the ’712 patent; (ii) that the 

domestic industry requirement has been 

satisfied with respect to the ’712 patent; 

and (iii) that the asserted claims of the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES