alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vineyard National Bancorp (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigneds hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
undersigneds best knowledge and belief:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated this 7th day of November, 2003.



| | Vineyard National Bancorp
(Company)
| | -------------------------------------



| | /s/ NORMAN A. MORALES
Norman A. Morales
President and Chief Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | /s/ GORDON FONG
Gordon Fong
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
5G

NB-IoT 

Sensor 

Nodes

Base 

station

Bluetooth 

LE Sensor 

Nodes

5G Core

LoRa 

Sensor 

Nodes Gateway

Zigbee UE

Sensor 

Nodes

Zigbee 

coordinator

Wireless Connection

Wired Connection

4G/5G Connection

LoRa

NB-IoT

Zigbee

Bluetooth LE

Bluetooth 

Raspberry 

Pi4

Private Cellular 

Access Network

Sensor Networks Testbed

Internet

Research: Security-in-Depth From Edge to Cloud

13

Backhaul

Radio Access 

Network

Raspberry 

Pi 4

gNB

eNB UE

gNB

U

E

Home 

Automation

Smart 

Building

Smart 

Grid

Smart 

Health

Industrial 

IoT

5G

Applications

gNB UE

UE

5G

Open5GCore

RU

BBU

RU

BBU 5G Core

CAPnet Zero Trust SDN 

Environment
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 24

- 00116

- CV

Minerva RAMOS

, Appellants

v.

Daniel LOREDO

, Appellee

From the County Court a t Law No. 10

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2024CV00069

Honorable Cesar Garcia , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. It is ORDERED that no costs shall be assessed against appellant in

relat ion to this appeal because she qualifies as indigent under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

20.

SIGNED June 26, 2024.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez

, Chief Justice
Exhibit 32.1

                              CNB BANCORP, INC.

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CNB Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William N. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.




By /s/ William N. Smith
-----------------------------------------
William N. Smith, Chief Executive Officer


May 9, 2005
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 25, 2010 

d0517 

Order 

 

May 25, 2010 

140869 & (16) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140869 

 COA: 295996 

Ionia CC: 08-013973-FH 

DARRYL L. GILLIAM-FRENCH, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the February 26, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICIA ORTIZ SALINAS, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-74036 

Agency No. A092-397-663 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of an

Immigration Judge’s Decision

Submitted December 18, 2017**

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Patricia Ortiz Salinas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of 

the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.31(a) that she 

did not have a reasonable fear of persecution or torture and thus is not entitled to 

relief from her reinstated removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 22 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-74036 

§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence the IJ’s factual findings. AndradeGarcia v. Lynch, 828 F.3d 829, 836 (9th Cir. 2016). We deny the petition for 

review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Ortiz Salinas failed 

to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of future persecution in Mexico on account 

of a protected ground. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016, 1018 (9th Cir. 

2003) (possibility of future persecution “too speculative”). 

Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s determination that Ortiz Salinas

failed to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of torture by or with the consent or 

acquiescence of the government of Mexico. See Zheng v. Holder, 644 F.3d 829, 

835-36 (9th Cir. 2011) (fear of torture speculative).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Aphton Corporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James F. Smith, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 9, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    JAMES F. SMITH
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | James F. Smith                                   
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29145]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Surrender of License of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration (``SBA'') under Section 309 of the Small 
Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 107.1900 of 
the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations, SBA by this 
notice declares null and void the license to function as a small 
business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company 
License No. 01/01-0411 issued to MB Growth Partners II, L.P.

United States Small Business Administration.

    Dated: December 3, 2014.
Javier E. Saade,
Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2014-29145 Filed 12-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

700 

KA 06-03701 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JASON M. STUBBS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

WILLIAM G. PIXLEY, ROCHESTER, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (STEPHEN X. O’BRIEN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a resentence of the Monroe County Court (Elma A.

Bellini, J.), rendered October 31, 2006. Defendant was resentenced

upon his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second

degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the resentence so appealed from is

unanimously reversed on the law and the matter is remitted to Monroe

County Court for the filing of a predicate felony offender statement

and resentencing.

Same Memorandum as in People v Stubbs ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d

___ [June 8, 2012]). 

Entered: June 8, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32.1



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of The InterGroup Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John V. Winfield, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: October 8, 2004                           /s/ John V. Winfield
                                                ----------------------------
                                                John V. Winfield, President
                                                and Chief Executive Officer




[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The InterGroup Corporation, Inc. and will be retained by The
InterGroup Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.]
#### Raney Ann Mitchell *v.*L. L. Moore, Assignees, etc.

Trusts — Election by Cestui Que Trust — Lien.

Where a cestui que trust elected to take the land in which the trust money had been invested, a lien should be given tor the difference between the amount of the trust fund invested in the land and the price paid therefor.

APPEAL FROM McLEAN CIRCUIT COURT.

October 9, 1873.

OpinioN by

Judge Peters :

The proper construction of the opinion of this court, delivered in this case when it was here on a former occasion, is that the court below should, by a reference of the case to the master, ascertain the difference between the amount of the trust funds in Barrett’s hands at the time he and Williams purchased the land and the price they paid for it, and for that difference a lien should be retained on the land. -Barrett and Williams were the purchasers of the land under the judicial sale. If they had kept it, there could have been no pretense that it would be subject to the payment of any part of appellee’s debt remaining unpaid. To that sale Raney Ann Mitchell was no party, but was then prosecuting a suit for her trust funds in the hands of Barrett. This court, in the opinion referred to, allowed her to elect whether she would take the land at the price that Barrett and Williams purchased it, or would take *169the money. It seems from the order that was made in the case when the opinion and mandate of this court were entered she elected to take the land. How that election was made does not appear. There is no order showing that the proceeding to recover her money has been dismissed. But be that as it may, the election must be understood to take the land at the price Barrett and Williams bought it at, with a lien on it for the difference between the amount of the trust funds in Barrett’s hands and the price paid for it by Barrett and Williams. If they had retained it the lien on it would have extended only to the extent of the price paid for it.

*L. W. Gates, for appellant.*

*Owens, for appellee.*

The judgment of the court below in subjecting the land to sale to pay the whole amount of appellee’s debt is erroneous and must be reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to render judgment for the ascertained difference between the price Barrett paid for the land and the amount of the trust funds that was on his hands at the time the land was sold and for further proceedings consistent herewith.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1496 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1496

  To upgrade the communications service used by the National Weather 
                    Service, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2023

    Mr. Feenstra (for himself, Mr. Carbajal, Mrs. Miller-Meeks, Ms. 
  Bonamici, Mr. Miller of Ohio, Mrs. Hinson, Mrs. Gonzalez-Colon, Mr. 
  Crawford, Mr. Jackson of North Carolina, Ms. Ross, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. 
 Sorensen, Mrs. Radewagen, and Mrs. Foushee) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and 
                               Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To upgrade the communications service used by the National Weather 
                    Service, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Weather Service 
Communications Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE COMMUNICATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Title IV of the Weather Research and Forecasting 
Innovation Act of 2017 (15 U.S.C. 8541 et seq.) is amended by adding at 
the end the following new section:

``SEC. 415. NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE COMMUNICATIONS.

    ``(a) System Upgrade.--The Director of the National Weather Service 
shall improve the instant messaging service used by National Weather 
Service personnel by implementing a commercial off-the-shelf 
communications solution hosted on the public cloud to serve as a 
replacement for the communications system in use as of the date of the 
enactment of this section (commonly referred to as `NWSChat'). Such 
communications solution shall satisfy requirements set forth by the 
Director to best accommodate future growth and perform successfully 
with increased numbers of users.
    ``(b) Funding.--From amounts made available for Operations, 
Research, and Facilities, the Director of the National Weather Service 
shall allocate up to $3,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 
2027 to carry out subsection (a).
    ``(c) Limitation on Funding.--Amounts made available to carry out 
subsection (a) shall be derived from amounts appropriated or otherwise 
made available to the National Weather Service.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents in section 1(b) of 
the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Act of 2017 is amended 
by inserting after the item relating to section 414 the following new 
item:

``Sec. 415. National Weather Service communications.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit(10)(c)(3)(a)**

 

**AMENDMENTTO CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT**

 

 

THIS AMENDMENT  (this“Amendment”), effective as of October 23, 2003, by and between ALLTELCorporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), and Jeffrey H. Fox(“Executive”), amends that certain Agreement, dated as of January 30, 1997, byand between the Corporation and Executive (the “Agreement”).

 

In considerationof the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, and other good andvaluable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are herebyacknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

 

1.  Section 1(C) of the Agreement is herebyamended by deleting subsection (iv) in its entirety and changing subsection(iii) to read as follows:

 

(iii) The consummation of(A) a merger or consolidation of the Corporation, statutory share exchange, orother similar transaction with another corporation, partnership, or otherentity or enterprise in which either the Corporation is not the surviving orcontinuing corporation or shares of common stock of the Corporation are to beconverted into or exchanged for cash, securities other than common stock of theCorporation, or other property, (B) a sale or disposition of all orsubstantially all of the assets of the Corporation, or (C) the dissolution ofthe Corporation.

 

2.  As amendedhereby, the Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed thisAmendment as of the date first above written.

 

 
|   | **ALLTEL CORPORATION**                |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
|   | By:                                   | /s/ Scott T. Ford |   |
|   | Scott T. Ford                         |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
|   | **EXECUTIVE**:                        |
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
|   |  /s/ Jeffrey  H. Fox             |   |
|   | Jeffrey H. Fox                        |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          32,559
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              36
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,143
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     80,928
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         452,498
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           448,497
<LOANS>                                      2,382,332
<ALLOWANCE>                                     39,139
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,162,207
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,624,052
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,025,057
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             35,089
<LONG-TERM>                                    294,035
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           151
<OTHER-SE>                                     183,823
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,162,207
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                145,744
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               33,575
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               179,319
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              56,723
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             114,128
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           65,191
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,828
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 51,475
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,794
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      21,794
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,830
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.96
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.84
<LOANS-NON>                                     10,922
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,069
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   736
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                43,175
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  (6,669)
<RECOVERIES>                                       805
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               39,139
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            39,139
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Cash Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. Douglas Orr, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 9, 2010



/s/ R. Douglas OrrR. Douglas Orr
Chief Financial Officer