alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Jean-Pierre Vandromme, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Golden Telecom, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the report based on such evaluation;and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:March 16, 2006   /s/ JEAN-PIERRE VANDROMME   Jean-Pierre Vandromme
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

TERRENCE DION WASHINGTON, : 

 Petitioner, : 

vs. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-0286-CG-C 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 08-0286-CG 

 Respondent. : 

JUDGMENT 

 In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, 

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that petitioner’s motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence, 

filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, is DENIED. Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of 

appealability and, therefore, he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. 

DONE and ORDERED this 23rd day of August, 2010. 

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:08-cr-00286-CG-C Document 62 Filed 08/23/10 Page 1 of 1
#### CONOPCO, INC., (doing business as Unipath Diagnostics Company), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCETON BIOMEDITECH CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-1188.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: April 4, 2001.

ORDER

The order of dismissal and the mandate dated March 13, 2001, having been issued in error, the same hereby are, VACATED AND RECALLED, and the notice of appeal is REINSTATED. The appellant’s brief is due on April 9, 2001.
11540.

#### Hogan *v.*The State.

Decided July 13, 1920.

Bloodworth, J.

1. The indictment in this case charged the accused with *“*drunkenness on public highway.” There is no evidence to support the allegation of the indictment that the accused did “ appear in an intoxicated condition on a public highway, . . which said drunkenness and intoxication was caused by the excessive use of intoxicating wines, beers, liquors, and opiates.”

2. The allegations of error in the special grounds of the motion for new trial need not be considered, as they are of such a character as that they will not likely reappear when the ease is tried again.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*

*426Indictment for misdemeanor; from Irwin superior court — Judge Bye. April 10, 1920.

*H. E. Oxford, Quincey & Rice,*for plaintiff in error.

*R. S. Foy, solicitor,*contra.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29166]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCO956000 L14200000.BJ0000]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plats of survey; Colorado.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Colorado State Office is 
publishing this notice to inform the public of the official filing of 
the survey plat listed below. The plat will be available for viewing at 
http://www.glorecords.blm.gov.

DATES: The plat described in this notice was filed on November 24, 
2014.

ADDRESSES: BLM Colorado State Office, Cadastral Survey, 2850 Youngfield 
Street, Lakewood, CO 80215-7093.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Bloom, Chief Cadastral Surveyor 
for Colorado, (303) 239-3856.
    Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may 
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to 
contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is 
available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to leave a message or 
question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during 
normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The supplemental plat of Section 32 in 
Township 12 South, Range 90 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado, 
was accepted on November 18, 2014, and filed on November 24, 2014.

Randy Bloom,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado.
[FR Doc. 2014-29166 Filed 12-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LINDA CONE SELENSKY, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 10-0041-WS-C

JUDGE MATTHEW GREEN, :

Defendant. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to

the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and

Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) is ADOPTED as the opinion of

this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED without

prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

DONE this 26th day of April, 2010.

s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00041-WS-C Document 8 Filed 04/26/10 Page 1 of 1
ex-10.24

 EXHIBIT 10.24
 

 KEY LINK ASSETS CORP.
 NOTE PAYABLE
 $2,750
 May 5, 2015
 Chicago, Illinois
 

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Key Link Assets Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Maker”) promises to pay to the order of Shawn Clark, together with any successors or assigns (collectively, the "Holder"), the principal sum of Two-Thousand Seven-Hundred and Fifty Dollars  (US $2,750). The Note is non-interest bearing and bears no collateral.
 

 The Note will be paid in full on June 30, 2016. The Company may redeem the Notes in part, or in full, prior to the due date of the Note. 
 

 Payments of principal shall be made at the place that Holder from time to time shall direct in writing, or, in the absence of direction, at 216 South Jefferson Street, Suite LL, Chicago, Illinois 60661.
 

 Upon a default by the undersigned to make any payment due hereunder, and continuing for five (5) calendar days after notice has been given to the undersigned, and at the option of the Holder, all of the unpaid indebtedness evidenced by this Note shall become immediately due and payable and shall accrue interest at the highest rate of interest then permitted by law.
 

 This Note is submitted by the undersigned to the Holder in Chicago, Illinois and shall be deemed to have been made thereat. This Note shall be governed and controlled by the laws of the State of Illinois as to interpretation, enforcement, validity, construction, effect, choice of law, and in all other respects.
 

 To induce the Holder to accept this Note, the undersigned irrevocably agrees that, subject to the Holder's sole and absolute election, all actions and proceedings in any way, manner or respect arising out of or from or related to this Note shall be litigated in courts having situs within the County of Cook, State of Illinois, the undersigned hereby covenants and submits to the jurisdiction of any local, state or federal court located within said county and state.
 

 Any notice, designation, demand, consent or request required herein to be given or to be served upon the undersigned by the Holder shall be deemed to have been given or served upon mailing, if addressed to the undersigned at 216 South Jefferson Street, Suite LL, Chicago, Illinois 60661, or upon actual receipt by the undersigned.
  
 In the event of default hereunder, the undersigned agrees to pay all expenses, including, without limitation, attorney fees, incurred by the Holder in endeavoring to enforce the rights of Holder hereunder.
 

 Key Link Assets Corp.
 

 

 By:   /s/ Shawn Clark
       Shawn Clark, Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DEMARIO WALKER, #L1625, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0501-CG-C

MOBILE COUNTY CLERKS, :

Defendant. :

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be and is hereby

DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

DONE and ORDERED this 23rd day of April, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00501-CG-C Document 18 Filed 04/23/10 Page 1 of 1
POWER OF ATTORNEY   We, the undersigned directors of Questar Gas Company, hereby severally constitute Ronald W. Jibson and Richard J. Doleshek, and each of them acting alone, our true and lawful attorneys, with full power to them and each of them to sign for us, and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2009 and any and all amendments to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Questar Gas Company, hereby ratifying and confirming our signa­tures as they may be signed by the attorneys appointed herein to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2009 and any and all amendments to such Report.  Witness our hands on the respective dates set forth below.  Signature Title Date   /s/ Chairman of the Board 02/09/10 Keith O. Rattie   /s/ President and 02/09/10 Ronald W. Jibson Chief Executive Officer   /s/ Director 02/09/10 Teresa Beck   /s/ Director 02/09/10 Robert E. McKee III   /s/ Director 02/09/10 Gary G. Michael   /s/ Director 02/09/10 Harris H. Simmons   /s/ Director 02/09/10 Bruce A. Williamson  BOARD\MEETING\10/FEB 8-9\QGC POA.DOCX
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CALVIN WILSON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-00078-CG-N

)

DOMINION MANAGEMENT, LLC, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A) and Standing Order 6 of this Court and

dated March 29, 2010, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this court and it is ORDERED that

plaintiff’s motion to sever and remand Count One of his Complaint is hereby GRANTED. The

Clerk of this Court is directed to take such steps as are necessary to transfer Count One of the

Complaint back to the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama, from whence it was removed. 

The case shall proceed as to Count Two of the Complaint, the claim for unpaid overtime under

the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201. 

DONE and ORDERED this 19th day of April, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00078-CG-N Document 17 Filed 04/19/10 Page 1 of 1
11176.

#### Bailey *v.*Holmes.

Decided July 19, 1920.

Action for damages; from city court of Sparta-—-Judge Johnson presiding. November 7,1919.

*G. L. Dickens, Wiley & Lewis,*for plaintiff.

*Burwell & Fleming,*for defendant.

Jenkins, P. J.

Assuming, but not deciding, that, under the authority of the ruling made in *Edenfield v. Brinson,*149 *Ga.*377 (100 S. B. 373), the oral contract for the sale of land, the vendor’s alleged breach of which forms the basis of this action, was not void for uncertainty or insufficiency of description, still, under the statute of frauds (Civil Code (1910), § 3222), providing that “ to make the following obligations binding on the promisor, the promise must be in writing, signed by the party to be charged therewith or some person by him lawfully authorized, viz.: any contract for sale of lands, or any interest in or concerning them,” the alleged oral contract of purchase and sale was void and unenforceable, notwithstanding that the petition shows that the vendee went into possession and made valuable improvements thereunder, since it does not appear that such improvements or any part thereof were made at the cost of the vendee, but on the contrary it is shown by the petition that in the contract of purchase it was “expressly agreed that the money for the improvements necessary to make the place fit for farming should be spent for this purpose before any payments were to be made upon the purchase-price of said land,” and that “plaintiff continued in possession of said tract of land for the space of about two years after his agreement with defendant, accounting to no one for rent, nor was any demand made upon him by defendant, or by any one else, for rent or payment; and petitioner invested the entire earnings of said tract of land in making improvements thereon during the time he held the same.” Thus, construing the petition against the pleader, it cannot be said that any allegation therein would show that the alleged improvements were made at the vendee’s cost; and since mere possession of the premises is not sufficient to relieve the transaction from the operation of the statute, the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the suit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.*
#### Antonio M. GONZALEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARKLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 78-2402.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 31, 1980.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied May 1,1980.

Manitzas, Harris, & Padgett, Inc., James H. Kizziar, Jr., San Antonio, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Luis M. Segura, Alexander Keller Doss, Jr., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BROWN, GEWIN and POLITZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

AFFIRMED.1 See Local Rule 21.2

1

. *See Burdine v. Texas Dept. of Community Affairs,*608 F.2d 563, 570 (5th Cir. 1979).

In addition to the attorney’s fees heretofore allowed, the District Court shall award the Appellee a reasonable attorney’s fee for this appeal. *See Christianburg Garment Co. v. EEOC,*434 U.S. 412, 417, 98 S.Ct. 694, 697, 54 L.Ed.2d 648, 654 (1978).

2

. See *N. L. R. B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America,*5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

I, JohnC. Pintozzi, certify that:

1.           I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York;

2.           Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.           Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4.           The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)        Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)       Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)        Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

5.           The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a)        All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)       Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

May 7, 2007

/s/ John C.Pintozzi

John C. Pintozzi

Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

 

E-4

----
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XVIII  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form  10-Q  for
the  period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XVIII, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XVIII,  Inc.,  each  certify, pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ ROBERT P JOHNSON
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XVIII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              December 30, 2008



                          /s/ PATRICK W KEENE
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XVIII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              December 30, 2008
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bay View Capital Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the
Report), I, John Okubo, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company for the periods presented therein. Date: August 13, 2004 /s/ John OkuboJohn OkuboExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Bay View Capital Corporation and will be retained by Bay View
Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TAVARIS LAMON BODY, :

Petitioner, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-0483-CG-C

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 10-0232-CG

Respondent. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all issues raised, and a de novo

determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is 

made, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(l)(B) and dated May 17, 2013, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this 

Court.

DONE this 6th day of June, 2013.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cr-00232-CG-C Document 99 Filed 06/06/13 Page 1 of 1