alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4858

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to provide financial assistance 

for the construction, improvement, and rehabilitation of farmers markets. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 19, 2004

Ms. KAPTUR (for herself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. KILPATRICK, 

Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. 

SERRANO, and Ms. SLAUGHTER) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to provide financial 

assistance for the construction, improvement, and rehabilitation of farmers markets.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farmers Markets In5 frastructure Assistance Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING FOR FARMERS MAR7 KETS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—In addition to exercising authority 

9 to make loans and loan guarantees under other law, the 
2

•HR 4858 IH 

1 Secretary shall make loans, loan guarantees, and grants 

2 to public agencies and nonprofit organizations for the con3 struction of new farmers markets, or the improvement or 

4 rehabilitation of existing farmers markets. 

5 (b) ELIGIBILITY.—To be eligible to receive a loan, 

6 loan guarantee, or grant under subsection (a) with respect 

7 to a farmers market the public agency or nonprofit organi8 zation involved shall—

9 (1) demonstrate financial need as determined 

10 by the Secretary; and 

11 (2) commit to reserving at least 50 percent of 

12 the floor area of the farmers market for the sale of 

13 products that are produced locally by farmers, 

14 ranchers, or associations of farmers or ranchers. 

15 (c) COST SHARING.—

16 (1) GRANTS.—The amount of a grant shall not 

17 exceed 25 percent of the cost of the activity funded 

18 under subsection (a). 

19 (2) MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF COMBINED GRANT

20 AND LOAN.—The combined amount of a grant and 

21 loan made or guaranteed shall not exceed 80 percent 

22 of the cost of the activity funded under subsection 

23 (a). 

24 (d) INTEREST RATE.—
3

•HR 4858 IH 

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—A loan made by the Sec2 retary under subsection (a) shall bear interest at the 

3 rate equivalent to the rate of interest charged on 

4 Treasury securities of comparable maturity on the 

5 date the loan is approved. 

6 (2) DURATION.—The interest rate for each loan 

7 will remain in effect for the term of the loan. 

8 (e) FUNDING.—Of the funds of the Commodity Cred9 it Corporation, the Secretary shall make available to carry 

10 out this section $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 

11 through 2007. 

12 (f) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect on 

13 October 1, 2004.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial  information  extracted from the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the nine month fiscal  period ended January 31, 1998 and
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter and nine months ended July 31,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              FEB-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,431
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,825
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,122
<PP&E>                                           1,024
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (831)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           (3,010)
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           (15)
<OTHER-SE>                                     (48,557)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (23,965)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   217
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,014
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,797)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,797)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,797)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.47)


</TABLE>
#### Floyd J. VOIGHT and Marion C. Voight, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. Floyd J. VOIGHT and C. Lorraine Peek Voight, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 78-1345.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 21, 1980.

Robert O. Rogers, Palm Beach, Fla., for petitioners-appellants.

M. Carr Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Michael L. Paup, Atty., Gilbert E. Andrews, Acting Chief, Libero Marinelli, Jr., U. S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Division, Lester Stein, Acting Chief Counsel, Ernest J. Brown, Atty., Tax Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellee.

Before VANCE, POLITZ and RANDALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed on the basis of the opinion of the United States Tax Court filed April 27, 1977, 68 T.C. 99.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
   
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
of U S WEST Communications, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 33-62845) of our report
dated February 12, 1996, on our audit of the consolidated financial statements
and consolidated financial statement schedule of U S WEST Communications, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 1995, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A.
    
 
/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 
   
Denver, Colorado
April 13, 1998
    
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
   
    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated February 6, 1998 on the consolidated financial
statements and related financial statement schedule of U S WEST Communications,
Inc., as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for the years then ended included in
this amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, into U S WEST Communications, Inc.'s
previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-62845).
    
 
/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
 
   
Denver, Colorado,
April 13, 1998.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-QSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 FOR USA INTERNATIONAL CHEMICAL AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             819
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   819
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                         806
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       819
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   738
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (738)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,538)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,538)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6727

CHARLES ROBERT BAREFOOT, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JIMMY THORTON; JOHN CORNLEY, Chief Deputy; KEM PICKETT, Captain; GEORGE DEWEY HUDSON, JR., District Attorney, Sampson County; JAMIE B. ASKINS, Assistant District Attorney; JAMES FREEMAN, Assistant District Attorney; LIEUTENANT SILVESTER WILSON; MARVIN POLK; KEVIN JOHN MCREAINY; EARL BUTLER; DONNIE HARRISON; W. STVEDA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-ct-03109-H) Submitted: August 3, 2007 Decided: August 15, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr. appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barefoot v. Thorton , No. 5:06-ct-03109-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 18, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
11121.

#### Thompson *v.*Asa G. Candler Inc. *et al.*

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under all the facts of the case the court did not err in excluding the documentary evidence offered by the plaintiff.

2. The evidence adduced by the plaintiff failed to prove as against any *28of the defendants any act of negligence as alleged in the petition as amended. The court therefore properly awarded a nonsuit.

Decided March 3, 1920.

Action fox damages; from city court of Atlanta—■ Judge Reid. October 21, 1919.

*Mark Bolding, J. Caleb Clarke,*for plaintiff.

*Candler, Thomson & Hirsch, Roy Lewis,*for defendant.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth,*JJ., *concur.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

LETTIE MALONE ANDERSON ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) CIVIL ACTION 10-00164-KD-B 

 ) 

JUDGE DON DAVIS, et al., ) 

 ) 

Defendants ) 

ORDER 

 After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the 

issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation 

to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made 

under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated June 10, 2010 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this 

Court. 

DONE and ORDERED this the 14th day of July, 2010. 

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

 KRISTI K. DUBOSE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Case 1:10-cv-00164-KD-B Document 10 Filed 07/15/10 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JAY DEWAYNE WARD, )

)

Petitioner/Defendant, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-0269-CG-N

)

vs. ) CRIMINAL NO. 09-00121-CG

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Respondent. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo

determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, 

the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) 

and dated December 9, 2013, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED this 19th day of February, 2014.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cr-00121-CG-B Document 105 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 1
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




UGI UTILITIES, INC.

ANNUAL BONUS AWARDS



David W. Trego is President and Chief Executive Officer of UGI Utilities, Inc. Mr. Trego received
a bonus, which was approved by the UGI Utilities, Inc. Board of Directors, for fiscal year 2005 in
the amount of $111,019.



Lon R. Greenberg is Chairman of UGI Utilities, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of UGI Corporation.
Mr. Greenberg is employed by UGI Corporation. Mr. Greenberg received a bonus, which was approved
by the UGI Corporation Board of Directors, for fiscal year 2005 in the amount of $1,634,000.



John L. Walsh is Vice Chairman of UGI Utilities, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of UGI
Corporation. Mr. Walsh is employed by UGI Corporation. Mr. Walsh received a bonus, which was
approved by the UGI Corporation Board of Directors, for fiscal year 2005 in the amount of $405,015.



John C. Barney is Senior Vice President — Finance and Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Secretary
and Treasurer of UGI Utilities, Inc. Mr. Barney received a bonus, which was approved by the UGI
Utilities, Inc. Board of Directors, for fiscal year 2005 in the amount of $92,564.



Robert H. Knauss is Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of UGI Utilities, Inc.,
a wholly owned subsidiary of UGI Corporation. Mr. Knauss is employed by UGI Corporation. Mr.
Knauss received a bonus, which was approved by the UGI Corporation Board of Directors, for fiscal
year 2005 in the amount of $255,996.



Bonuses reported for Messrs. Greenberg, Walsh and Knauss are
paid by UGI Corporation, the parent of UGI Utilities, Inc., and are attributable to their positions with UGI Corporation.



3
EXHIBIT 32.1

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Cash Financial Services,
 Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September
 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
 hereof (the "Report"), I, Phillip E. Powell and R. Douglas Orr certify,
 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

      (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.


 Date:  November 4, 2004


 /s/ PHILLIP E. POWELL
 --------------------------------------
 Phillip E. Powell
 Chief Executive Officer


 /s/ R. DOUGLAS ORR
 --------------------------------------
 R. Douglas Orr
 Chief Financial Officer
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1505 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 14 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 13), 2023 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States 

courts of certain rights relating to certain marks, trade 

names, or commercial names. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 1505 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Stolen Trademarks 

3 Honored in America Act of 2023’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF PROHIBITION. 

5 Section 211 of the Department of Commerce and Re6 lated Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained in 

7 section 101(b) of division A of Public Law 105–277; 112 

8 Stat. 2681–88) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)(2)— 

10 (A) by inserting ‘‘or entity of the executive 

11 branch’’ after ‘‘U.S. court’’; 

12 (B) by striking ‘‘by a designated national’’; 

13 and 

14 (C) by inserting before the period ‘‘that 

15 was used in connection with a business or as16 sets that were confiscated unless the original 

17 owner of the mark, trade name, or commercial 

18 name, or the bonafide successor-in-interest has 

19 expressly consented’’; 

20 (2) in subsection (b)— 

21 (A) by inserting ‘‘or entity of the executive 

22 branch’’ after ‘‘U.S. court’’; and 

23 (B) by striking ‘‘by a designated national 

24 or its successor-in-interest’’; 

25 (3) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub26 section (e); 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

HR 1505 RFS

1 (4) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(d) Subsections (a)(2) and (b) of this section shall 

4 apply only if the person or entity asserting the rights knew 

5 or had reason to know at the time when the person or 

6 entity acquired the rights asserted that the mark, trade 

7 name, or commercial name was the same as or substan8 tially similar to a mark, trade name, or commercial name 

9 that was used in connection with a business or assets that 

10 were confiscated.’’; and 

11 (5) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by 

12 striking ‘‘In this section:’’ and all that follows 

13 through ‘‘(2) The term’’ and inserting ‘‘In this sec14 tion, the term’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 

2023. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 28, 2013

s0520

Order 

Clerk

May 28, 2013

146682

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146682

COA: 311305

Wayne CC: 11-010965-FC

TERRY PANTAZ DURR,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 150 

To prohibit a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. DUNCAN (for himself, Mr. RESCHENTHALER, Mr. PERRY, Mr. ESTES, Mr. 

WEBER of Texas, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. JACKSON of Texas, Mr. CARL, Mr. STAUBER, Mr. KUSTOFF, 

Mr. ARMSTRONG, and Mr. WOMACK) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting American 

5 Energy Production Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTING AMERICAN ENERGY PRODUCTION. 

7 (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con8 gress that States should maintain primacy for the regulaVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:48 Jan 18, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H150.IH H150

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 150 IH

1 tion of hydraulic fracturing for oil and natural gas produc2 tion on State and private lands. 

3 (b) PROHIBITION ON DECLARATION OF A MORATO4 RIUM ON HYDRAULIC FRACTURING.—Notwithstanding 

5 any other provision of law, the President may not declare 

6 a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing unless 

7 such moratorium is authorized by an Act of Congress. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANTHONY GIOVANI ORELLANA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-451

[March 3, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

562017CF003275A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuña, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

GERBER, J.

The defendant, whom a predecessor judge had sentenced as a 

youthful offender to community control and who later committed noncriminal violations of that community control, appeals from the 

successor judge’s revocation of his community control and imposition of 

a six-year prison sentence. The defendant argues the successor judge: 

(1) failed to recognize during the sentencing hearing on the community 

control violations that the defendant had originally been sentenced as a 

youthful offender and had committed only non-criminal violations, 

thereby limiting the successor judge’s sentencing discretion to a 

maximum six-year prison sentence; and (2) failed to award the defendant 

with a proper jail credit amount.

On the first argument, we affirm. Contrary to the defendant’s 

argument, the record does not show the successor judge believed he had 

no discretion but to sentence the defendant according to the fifteen-year 

maximum for each second-degree felony offense or that he had a desire 

to sentence the defendant to an incarcerative period less than the six 
2

years’ imprisonment imposed. Further, the successor judge, in his order 

denying the defendant’s motion to correct sentencing error, insisted he 

was aware of his sentencing discretion under the Youthful Offender Act’s 

six-year incarceration limitation.

On the second argument, the state properly concedes the successor 

judge erred in denying the defendant’s motion to correct sentence to 

award the correct amount of jail time credit of 82 days to 103 days,

because the record does not show the defendant waived his entitlement 

to the correct amount of jail time credit.

Based on the foregoing, we affirm the defendant’s sentence but 

remand for the circuit court to amend the judgment by awarding the 

defendant with the corrected jail credit of 103 days. The defendant need 

not be present for this ministerial correction. 

Sentence affirmed; remanded for correction of jail credit.

FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.