alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1 - May 15, 2015






Exhibit 4.1




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE SHAREHOLDER PROTECTION RIGHTS AGREEMENT


Amendment No. 1, dated May 15, 2015 (the “Amendment”), to the Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated February 17, 2015 (the “Rights Agreement”), by and between Metro Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as rights agent (the “Rights Agent”). 
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5.4 of the Rights Agreement, the Company and the Rights Agent may, prior to the Flip-in Date, from time to time, supplement or amend the Rights Agreement in any respect without the approval of any holders of the Rights;
WHEREAS, the Flip-in Date has not occurred;
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Rights Agreement as set forth herein;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5.4 of the Rights Agreement, by execution and delivery hereof, the Company requests that the Rights Agent duly execute and deliver this Amendment;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Rights Agent hereby agree to amend the Rights Agreement as follows.
		
	1.
	Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Rights Agreement.


		
	2.
	Section 1.1 of the Rights Agreement is amended by deleting the words “the first anniversary of the date of this Agreement” in clause (iii) of the definition of “Expiration Time” and replacing such words with “May 15, 2015”.


		
	3.
	Exhibit A to the Rights Agreement is amended by deleting the reference to “February 17, 2016” in the Form of Rights Certificate and substituting therefor “May 15, 2015”.


		
	4.
	Except as expressly set forth herein, the Rights Agreement shall not be supplemented or amended, and the Rights Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


		
	5.
	Pursuant to Section 5.4 of the Rights Agreement, this Amendment shall be effective immediately upon execution by the Company and, following such execution, all references to the Rights Agreement shall be deemed to be references to the Rights Agreement, as amended hereby.


		
	6.
	Sections 5.11 (Successors), 5.15 (Governing Law; Exclusive Jurisdiction), 5.16 (Counterparts) and 5.17 (Severability) of the Rights Agreement are hereby incorporated by reference into this Amendment and shall apply to this Amendment, mutatis mutandis, as if fully set forth herein.


[Signature Page Follows]











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first above written.
METRO BANCORP, INC.




By:        /s/ Mark A. Zody                
Name:    Mark A. Zody
Title:    Chief Financial Officer






COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY, N.A.




By:        /s/ Sharon Tucker-Lockett            
Name:     Sharon Tucker-Lockett
Title:    Senior Vice President




































































[Signature Page to Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement]
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Dennis J. Stevermer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Milastar Corporation and Subsidiaries;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: July 29, 2005/s/ DENNIS J. STEVERMERDennis J. StevermerChief Financial Officer
Press Release


 EXHIBIT 10.1 
  
 Zapata Corporation Authorizes Exploration of Sale of Its Omega Protein Corporation Holdings 
  
 ROCHESTER, N.Y.—(BUSINESS WIRE)—Dec. 8, 2005—Zapata
Corporation (NYSE: ZAP) today announced that its Board of Directors has authorized management to seek a buyer for its 58% common equity interest in Omega Protein Corporation (NYSE: OME), the largest U.S. producer of protein-rich meal and oil derived
from marine sources. The Board believes that Zapata shareholder value can be increased through an appropriate transaction. 
  
 Zapata recently completed the sale of its interest in Safety Components International, Inc. (OTCBB: SAFY) and plans to continue to evaluate strategic
opportunities for using its capital resources. 
  
 Although the
Board has asked Zapata management to find a buyer for its interest in Omega Protein, there can be no assurance that any transaction will result from the process. 
  
 About Zapata: 
  
 Zapata is a holding company which currently has one operating company, Omega Protein Corporation. As of September 30, 2005, the Company had a 58%
ownership interest in Omega Protein. In addition, Zapata owns 98% of Zap.Com Corporation (OTCBB: ZPCM), which is a public shell company. 
  
 The Company makes certain reports available free of charge on its website at www.zapatacorp.com as soon as reasonably practicable after this information
is electronically filed, or furnished to, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. 
  
 Information included in this press release includes forward-looking statements that are intended to be subject to the safe harbor provisions of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “will,” “could,” “may,” and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainty that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking
statements. These risks include, without limitation, not being able to find a buyer for the interest, or the failure to consummate any transaction that may be negotiated or that it might not be successful in its pursuits of strategic opportunities.
More information about potential factors that could affect Zapata’s business and financial results is included under the heading “Significant Factors That Could Affect Future Performance and Forward-Looking Statements” in the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005. Zapata assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements or to update the reasons actual results could differ from those projected in the
forward-looking statements. 
  
 CONTACT: Zapata
Corporation 
 Leonard DiSalvo, 585-242-8703 
  
 SOURCE: Zapata Corporation
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1537 

To amend the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 

2008 to transfer the custody of an unaccompanied alien child to the 

Secretary of Health and Human Services or such child’s parent or 

legal guardian. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2023 

Mr. BURGESS (for himself, Mr. ELLZEY, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. 

WEBER of Texas, and Mr. CRENSHAW) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2008 to transfer the custody of an unaccompanied alien child to the Secretary of Health and 

Human Services or such child’s parent or legal guardian. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting an Alien 

5 child’s Reasonable Expectation of No Trafficking Act of 

6 2023’’ or the ‘‘PARENT Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1537 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROVIDING SAFE AND SECURE PLACEMENTS FOR 

2 CHILDREN. 

3 Section 235(b)(3) of the William Wilberforce Traf4 ficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (8 

5 U.S.C. 1232(b)(3)) shall be amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(3) TRANSFERS OF UNACCOMPANIED ALIEN

7 CHILDREN.—Not later than 72 hours after deter8 mining that a child is an unaccompanied alien child, 

9 any department or agency of the Federal Govern10 ment that has an unaccompanied alien child in cus11 tody shall only transfer the custody of such child to 

12 such child’s verified parent or legal guardian or to 

13 the Secretary of Health and Human Services.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XVIII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB  for
the  period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XVIII, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XVIII,  Inc.,  each  certify, pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XVIII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 5, 2005



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XVIII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 5, 2005
AO 245D (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations (7911)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE

V. (For Revocation of Probation or Supervised Release)

MARSHALL LANCE SHADDIX CASE NUMBER: 1:05-CR-00132-002

USM NUMBER: 09064-003

THE DEFENDANT: Patrick D. Finnegan, Esquire

Defendant's Attorney

admitted guilt to violation of supervision conditions: Statutory and 2 as set forth in the 

Petition dated 10/13/2015.

was found in violation of supervision condition: 

Violation Number Nature of Violation

Date violation

Occurred

Statutory

2

New Offense

Technical

08/29/2015

The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 2 of this judgment. The sentence is 

imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.

The defendant has not violated condition(s) and is discharged as to such violation(s) 

condition.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States Attorney for this 

district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, 

costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid.

January 19, 2016

Date of Imposition of Judgment

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

January 22, 2016

Date

X

Case 1:05-cr-00132-CG-D Document 149 Filed 01/22/16 Page 1 of 2
Judgment 2

AO 245D (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations: Sheet 2 - Imprisonment

Defendant: MARSHALL LANE SHADDIX

Case Number: 1:05-CR-00132-002

IMPRISONMENT

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be 

imprisoned for a total term of TWENTY-FOUR (24) MONTHS.

The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons: 1) That the 

defendant be imprisoned at an institution where a mental health treatment program is available. 

2) That the defendant’s designation be delay for a period of three weeks from January 19, 2016 to 

accommodate the defendant’s scheduled shoulder surgery.

The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district:

at .m. on .

as notified by the United States Marshal.

The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau 

of Prisons:

before 2 p.m. on .

as notified by the United States Marshal.

as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office.

RETURN

I have executed this judgment as follows:

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

Defendant delivered on to at __________________

with a certified copy of this judgment.

 UNITED STATES MARSHAL 

By ________________________________

 Deputy U.S. Marshal

X

X

Case 1:05-cr-00132-CG-D Document 149 Filed 01/22/16 Page 2 of 2
11186.

#### Stanford *v.*The State.

Decided March 3, 1920.

Conviction of manslaughter; from Warren superior court — Judge Walker. November 28, 1919.

Broyles, C. J.

1. The excerpts from the charge of the court, complained of, when considered in the light of the entire charge, and of the facts of the case, contain no reversible error.

2. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this ’ court, a general exception to the entire charge of the court is too broad to he considered, unless the whole charge was erroneous.

3. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err.in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and*Bloodworth, *JJ.; concur.*

*33Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

*M. L. Felts,*for plaintiff in error.

*R. C. Norman, solicitor-general,*contra.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTIONS

Appellate case name: Ex parte Patricio Estrada

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00792

- CR

Trial court case number: 17

- DCR

- 077572

Trial court: 268th District Court of Fort Bend County

Appellant, Patricio Estrada

, timely filed a pro se notice of appeal on September 4, 2018, from the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law denying hi s motion for

a pretrial writ of habeas corpus and order, signed on August 19, 2018

. S ee T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.2(a)(1). On September 11, 2018, appellant filed a “Motion for Out

- of

- Time Appeal” in this Court seeking an extension of time to file his notice of appeal from the denial of his habeas application. T he Court dismisses as moot appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file his notice of appeal because it was timely filed

. On September 21, 2018, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed in this Court containing the trial court’s certification that appellant has a right of app eal of the denial of his habeas application. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d), 37.1. This record also included the trial court’s September 21, 2018 Order for Competency Evaluation ordering that appellant be evaluated by a psychologist who shall issue a writte n report determining whether he is competent to stand trial.

On September 25

, 201 8

, appellant filed this pro se “Motion for E mergency Stay Pending Appeal of Pretrial Habeas Corpus” requesting that this Court stay the criminal trial
th at is set from October 1

- 8, 2018, pen ding this Court’s resolution of his a ppeal.
Accordingly, after reviewing the motion and the r ecord

, specifically concluding that the competency evaluation will likely delay the trial anyway, the Court DENIES appellant’ s motion for an emerg ency stay

. Finally, after reviewing all the records, the
Court determines that it does not desire briefing. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 31.1.

It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: September 28, 2018

______________________
| EXHIBIT      32.2 |
|-------------------|

| Chief      Financial Officer Certification |
|--------------------------------------------|

| Pursuant      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section    906 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| of      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|----------------------------------------|

|   | 1. | The      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  October 30,      2008 | /s/ Lee W.      Hendrickson                                                                                        Lee      W. HendricksonChief      Financial Officer |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Mrs. Susie Lite MORRISON and Clarence Morrison, Sr., Mother and Father of Deceased Clarence Morrison, Jr., suing on their behalf and as Administrators of Clarence Morrison, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF BATON ROUGE et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 79-2532

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 20, 1980.

Murphy W. Bell, Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Watson, Blanche, Wilson & Posner, George K. Anding, Jr., Baton Rouge, La., for defendants-appellees.

Before BROWN, TJOFLAT and FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., Circuit Judges.

*

 Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir. R. 18.

PER CURIAM:

This action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983, 1985, 1988 and the 14th Amendment arose out of an unfortunate incident in which the Appellants’ son, a fourteen-year-old black boy, was shot and killed by a white Baton Rouge police officer. The Morrisons sued the City, the Mayor, the Chief of Police, the police officer and the District Attorney for East Baton Rouge Parish, alleging a violation of their son’s constitutional rights by the Baton Rouge Police Department’s “policy of summary punishment of blacks by white policemen when the former [are] found in incriminating situations.”

The particular allegation against the District Attorney, Ossie B. Brown, was that he used the grand jury investigation procedure as a “legal backup” to support these arbitrary actions by the police department. The District Court granted Brown’s motion to dismiss the action because the complaint failed to state a claim against the defend*78ant upon which relief could be granted, relying on *Imbler v. Pachtman;*424 U.S. 409, 96 S.Ct. 984, 47 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976), which establishes immunity for District Attorneys from suits arising out of performance of their prosecutorial duties. The Morrisons now appeal this ruling.

Although the District Court dismissed the action against this particular party, it did not enter a final judgment to that effect in accordance with F.R.Civ.P. 54(b). In the absence of a certificate complying with this rule, there is no appealable final judgment, and we have no jurisdiction to consider this appeal. *Cason v. Owen,*578 F.2d 572, 574 (5th Cir. 1978); *Kirtland v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.,*568 F.2d 1166, 1168-69 (5th Cir. 1978). Therefore, the appeal is

DISMISSED.
<page>	EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund II L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey
A. Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		August 14, 2003