alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


ACCUIMAGE DIAGNOSTICS CORP.


                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the Form 10-KSB of AccuImage  Diagnostics  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Aviel Faliks, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  January 5, 2005


/s/ AVIEL FALIKS
____________________________________________
    Aviel Faliks
    President and Chief Executive Officer




A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ACCUIMAGE DIAGNOSTICS CORP. AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY ACCUIMAGE DIAGNOSTICS CORP. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA).

# ACTION:

Notice of open Federal Advisory Committee meetings.

# SUMMARY:

The SBA is issuing this notice to announce the location, date, time and agenda for the 1st quarter meetings of the National Small Business Development Center (SBDC) Advisory Board.

# DATES:

The meetings for the 2nd quarter will be held on the following dates:

Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. EST

Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. EST

Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. EST

# ADDRESSES:

These meetings will be held via conference call.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The meeting is open to the public however advance notice of attendance is requested. Anyone wishing to be a listening participant must contact Monika Nixon by fax or email. Her contact information is Monika Nixon, Program Specialist, 409 Third Street SW., Washington, DC 20416, Phone, 202-205-7310, Fax 202-481-5624, email,                         *monika.nixon@sba.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), SBA announces the meetings of the National SBDC Advisory Board. This Board provides advice and counsel to the SBA Administrator and Associate Administrator for Small Business Development Centers.

The purpose of these meetings is to discuss following issues pertaining to the SBDC Advisory Board.:

—SBA Update

—Annual Meetings

—Board Assignments

—Member Roundtable

Additionally, if you need accommodations because of a disability or require additional information, please contact Monika Nixon at the information above.

Diana Doukas,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2014-29147 Filed 12-10-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           30159
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   199250
<ALLOWANCES>                                      5912
<INVENTORY>                                     169262
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                418393
<PP&E>                                          286791
<DEPRECIATION>                                  135547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1218819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           184143
<BONDS>                                         735964
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            27731
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (218457)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (218456)
<SALES>                                         546988
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                546988
<CGS>                                           350792
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   131501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 59999
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               60543
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4696
<INCOME-TAX>                                      4171
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                525
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    193
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1024)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JENISE BROCKS, : 

 : 

Plaintiff, : 

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 10-0004-WS-M 

 : 

FARMERS INSURANCE, et al., : 

 : 

Defendants. : 

 

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be and 

is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. 

DONE this 24th day of August, 2010. 

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:10-cv-00004-WS-M Document 11 Filed 08/24/10 Page 1 of 1
#### William LOGGINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Fred PHILS, Medical Director, Sedgwick County Detention Facility; Sedgwick County Medical Staff, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-3402.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

June 5, 2001.

Before. SEYMOUR, McKAY, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

William Loggins brought this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging his *794civil rights were violated when the medical staff at the Sedgwick County (Kansas) Detention Facility dispensed medication to him without first performing a physical examination or securing a doctor’s prescription. Mr. Loggins claims he has suffered significant side effects as a result of taking the medication. The district court concluded that Mr. Loggins’ complaint failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted and dismissed it pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We affirm.

We review de novo the district court’s dismissal of a complaint under Rule 12(b)(6). *Sutton v. Utah State School for the Deaf & Blind,*173 F.3d 1226, 1236 (10th Cir.1999). Because Mr. Loggins' is proceeding pro se, his pleadings are to be liberally construed. *Hall v. Bellmon,*935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir.1991). Nevertheless, a pro se plaintiff retains “the burden of alleging sufficient facts on which a recognized legal claim could be based.” *Id.*

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal, and affirm the district court’s dismissal for substantially the reasons stated in its Order of December 5, 2000. Mr. Loggins states, at most, a claim of medical malpractice. While prisons are obligated to provide medical care to their inmates, *Estelle v. Gamble,*429 U.S. 97, 103, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976), “[m]edical malpractice does not become a constitutional violation merely because the victim is a prisoner.” *Id.*at 106, 97 S.Ct. 285. Mr. Loggins has alleged no facts that evidence the “deliberate indifference to serious medical needs [that] is necessary in order to have a semblance of a § 1983 case.” *Daniels v. Gilbreath,*668 F.2d 477, 482 (10th Cir.1982).

The dismissal by the district court is AFFIRMED. Mr. Loggins is reminded of his continuing obligation to make partial payments of the docketing fees until they are fully paid.

*

 After examining appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this ap*794peal. *See*Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2) and 10th Cir.R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir.R. 36.3.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LARRY C. DIXON, #138238, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0811-WS-N

CMS MEDICAL, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the

issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation

to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made

under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED

that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

and that the motion to proceed without prepayment of fees be and is hereby DENIED.

.

DONE this 23rd day of February, 2010. 

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00811-WS-N Document 9 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            4381
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     8398
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       4224
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 17785
<PP&E>                                           74757
<DEPRECIATION>                                   15244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   80452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           110145
<BONDS>                                            350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         29743
<OTHER-SE>                                         300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     80452
<SALES>                                          74137
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 74137
<CGS>                                            67137
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    67137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2696
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3833
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    471
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                471
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       471
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7628

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KITTRELL BERNARD DECATOR; CRAIG LAMONT SCOTT,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CR-94-281-K, CR-95-202-K)

Submitted: January 30, 1998 Decided: February 18, 1998

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kittrell Bernard Decator, Craig Lamont Scott, Appellants Pro Se.

James G. Warwick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Kittrell B. Decator and Craig L. Scott appeal from the district court's order denying their motion filed pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (6), to dismiss their convictions and sentences

for bank robbery, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(a) (West Supp. 1997). Appellants contend that the Government does not have a private cause of

action under the bank robbery statute. Because their claims are

frivolous, we affirm the district court's dismissal of their

motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 74765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29420]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLOR957000-L63100000-HD0000-15XL1116AF: HAG15-0042]


Filing of Plats of Survey: Oregon/Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plats of survey of the following described lands are 
scheduled to be officially filed in the Bureau of Land Management, 
Oregon State Office, Portland, Oregon, 30 days from the date of this 
publication.

Willamette Meridian

Oregon

T. 7 S., R. 2 E., accepted November 7, 2014
T. 17 S., R. 7 W., accepted November 7, 2014
T. 32 S., R. 5 W., accepted November 7, 2014
T. 4 N., R. 3 W., accepted November 7, 2014
T. 5 N., R. 3 W., accepted November 7, 2014
T. 21 S., R. 8 W., accepted November 7, 2014

ADDRESSES: A copy of the plats may be obtained from the Public Room at 
the Bureau of Land Management, Oregon State Office, 1220 SW. 3rd 
Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204, upon required payment.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle Hensley, (503) 808-6132, Branch 
of Geographic Sciences, Bureau of Land Management, 1220 SW. 3rd Avenue, 
Portland, Oregon 97204. Persons who use a telecommunications device for 
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 
1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business 
hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a 
message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply 
during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A person or party who wishes to protest 
against this survey must file a written notice with the Oregon State 
Director, Bureau of Land Management, stating that they wish to protest. 
A statement of reasons for a protest may be filed with the notice of 
protest and must be filed with the Oregon State Director within thirty 
days after the protest is filed. If a protest against the survey is 
received prior to the date of official filing, the filing will be 
stayed pending consideration of the protest. A plat will not be 
officially filed until the day after all protests have been dismissed 
or otherwise resolved. Before including your address, phone number, 
email address, or other personal identifying information in your 
comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--including your 
personal identifying information--may be made publicly available at any 
time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal 
identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we 
will be able to do so.

Mary J.M. Hartel,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor of Oregon/Washington.
[FR Doc. 2014-29420 Filed 12-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XVIII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB  for
the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XVIII, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XVIII,  Inc.,  each  certify, pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XVIII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 6, 2005



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XVIII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 6, 2005
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Historic Preservation Properties 1989
LP ("HPP'89") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HPP'89.


/s/ Robert Gunn
---------------------------
Robert Gunn
Asset Manager
(Performing similar functions of Financial Officer)

Date:  August 8, 2003
       --------------
<PAGE>
                                          
                           EXCERPTS OF MINUTES OF MEETING
                            OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
                                 NASH FINCH COMPANY
                                          
                                 November 17, 1998

     RESOLVED, that the resolutions adopted by this Board of Directors on
November 19, 1996, relating to compensation of outside directors generally, be
and hereby are amended and modified to provide that the per month retainer for
serving as a director be increased from $1,250 per month ($15,000 per year) to
$1,500 per month ($18,000 per year) effective January 1, 1999.

     RESOLVED FURTHER, that except to the extent amended and modified by the
foregoing resolution, the said resolutions adopted November 19, 1996 remain in
full force and effect.
Exhibit 32.1
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXCECUTIVE
OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:

/s/ Alec C. CovingtonName:
    Alec C. CovingtonTitle:
    President and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Robert B. DimondName:
    Robert B. DimondTitle:
    Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS





To the Shareholders of
    ALLTEL Corporation:


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of 
our report incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, into the Company's 
previously filed Registration Statements, File Nos. 2-99523, 33-25382,
33-34495, 33-35343, 33-41234, 33-48476, 33-51047, 33-54175, 33-56291
and 33-65199.



                                                    /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Little Rock, Arkansas,
February 19, 1996.


                                       31
Document #104 Uniform Automated Fingerprint 

Identification System (AFIS) Feature Symbols – Position 

Statement (Latent/Tenprint), Ver. 1.0

Date of First Issue 03/13/13 Current Issue Date 03/13/13

Web Posting Date 04/27/13

Date of Last Review N/A Date of Next Review 03-2018 Appendix present/Letter No

1 of 2

Document #104

Uniform Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) 

Feature Symbols

Position Statement

(Latent/Tenprint)

SWGFAST encourages all manufacturers of AFIS technology to implement the use of standardized feature 

symbols.

As part of the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Law Enforcement Standards Office’s work to 

improve latent AFIS interoperability, one issue that has been raised is the variation in how fingerprint features are 

displayed among AFIS products. Having a standard set of symbols would benefit examiners utilizing multiple 

AFIS systems on a regular basis. Additionally, standardized feature symbols would aid in user acceptance and 

training from product to product.
Document #104 Uniform Automated Fingerprint 

Identification System (AFIS) Feature Symbols – Position 

Statement (Latent/Tenprint), Ver. 1.0

Date of First Issue 03/13/13 Current Issue Date 03/13/13

Web Posting Date 04/27/13

Date of Last Review N/A Date of Next Review 03-2018 Appendix present/Letter No

2 of 2

Revision Table

Version Effective Start Effective End Posted Archived Change

1.0 03/13/13 N/A 4/27/13 N/A Original Issue