alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10QSB FOR THE PERIOD OCTOBER 1, 1999 TO DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         418,117
<SECURITIES>                                   200,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  341,528
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,741,484
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,701,129
<PP&E>                                       1,088,392
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,977,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,926,209
<BONDS>                                      1,782,950
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       894,600
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,573,634
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,977,349
<SALES>                                      2,937,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,962,500
<CGS>                                        2,647,045
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,647,045
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               452,971
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (137,516)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,954
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (137,516)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (137,516)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (137,516)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1537
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1537


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Mylan Laboratories Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period[s] presented in this
report.
  /s/ Edward J. BorkowskiEdward J. BorkowskiChief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6928

DERRYMORE CAMPBELL, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus RONALD J. ANGELONE; GENE JOHNSON; DUNCAN MILLS; ARMSTRONG; JOHN DOE; RUFUS FLEMING; H. R. POWELL; M. JORDAN; W. F. SEAL; R. A. YOUNG; L. W. JARVIS; CLARENCE A. HOLLAR; NENA ADAMS; K. A. POLINSKY; D. F. MILLER; PIRES; F. E. LOCKHART; P. E. MADDEX; TED DURR; L. HUFFMAN; G. K. WASHINGTON; L. T. EDMONDS; B. BOOKER; C. S. WINGFIELD; KELLY HARRISON; JANE DOE; LINAMEN; W. CLARK; HANKINS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-1023-7) Submitted: May 31, 2006 Decided: September 27, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derrymore Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Dana L. Gay, Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.- 2 - Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Derrymore Campbell appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action challenging, among other things, the validity and enforcement of the prison’s grooming policy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Campbell v. Angelone , No. CA-01-1023-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 19, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                 Exhibit 23

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Mobil Corporation of our report dated February 28, 1997, included in the 1996
Annual Report to Shareholders of Mobil Corporation.

Our audits also included the financial  statement  schedule of Mobil Corporation
listed in Item 14(a).  This  schedule  is the  responsibility  of the  Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial  statements taken as a whole,  presents 
fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Nos.  33-18130 and 333-16819)  pertaining to the Employees  Savings
Plan of Mobil Oil  Corporation;  Form S-8 (No.  33-5797)  pertaining to the 1986
Mobil Incentive  Compensation and Stock Option Plan; Form S-3 (No.  33-34133-01)
of the  Mobil  Oil  Corporation  Employee  Stock  Ownership  Plan  Trust for the
registration of $300,000,000  principal amount of debt securities  guaranteed by
Mobil   Corporation;   Form  S-3  (No.   33-43745)  for  the   registration   of
$1,500,000,000 of Mobil Corporation Debt Securities; Form S-3 (No. 33-49945) for
the registration of $1,500,000,000  of Mobil  Corporation Debt Securities;  Form
S-8 (No. 33-48887) pertaining to the 1991 Mobil Incentive Compensation and Stock
Option Plan; Form S-3 (No.  33-50943)  pertaining to the Mobil Corporation Stock
Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan for the registration of 5,000,000 shares
of Mobil  Corporation  Common Stock and related Preferred Share Purchase Rights;
Form S-8 (No. 33-61657) pertaining to the 1995 Mobil Incentive  Compensation and
Stock  Ownership  Plan;  Form  S-3  (No.  333-13457)  for  the  registration  of
$650,000,000 Pass Through  Certificates with the applicable  underlying payments
guaranteed by Mobil Corporation;  and in the related  Prospectuses of our report
dated February 28, 1997, with respect to the financial  statements  incorporated
herein by reference  and our report  included in the  preceding  paragraph  with
respect to the financial  statement  schedule  included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Mobil Corporation.



                                                   /s/Ernst & Young LLP
                                                      Ernst & Young LLP



Fairfax, Virginia
March 10, 1997

                                                                               



Mobil                               - 33 -
SWGDOG SC10 – Outreach and Education 

Posted for Public Comment 5/24/10 – 7/22/10. Approved by membership 9/15/10. 

Statement of Purpose: To share ideas of consensus-based best practices and research with 

stakeholders in the legal, scientific, and canine communities. In addition, SC10, will provide a 

mechanism for feedback to best measure SWGDOG’s effectiveness within the canine 

community.

1. OBJECTVES: 

1.1. To share information about the goals and mission of SWGDOG through presentations, 

written materials, and personal contacts. 

1.2. To promote and facilitate education about the practical utilization of consensus-based 

best practice guidelines throughout the legal, scientific, and canine communities. 

1.3. To bring together organizations and/or individuals to utilize the recommended 

SWGDOG best practices. 

1.4. To provide educational information on related technological updates. 

1.5. To provide a common forum for exchange and dissemination of information as 

knowledge in the field advances and expands. 

1.6. To compile and disseminate suggestions from the detector dog communities to the 

membership of SWGDOG.
| 1.   | The Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  April 27, 2010 | /s/ Joseph D. Reid                                                                                                Joseph D. ReidChief Executive Officer |
|---------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Structure and Formation of 

Antigen-Antibody Complexes

Melody Lee | Walt Whitman High School

Mentor: Monica Castellanos
Immunoglobulin G Streptavidin

http://images.digopaul.com/wp-content/uploads/related_images/2015/09/10/igg_1.jpg http://www.ibs.fr/local/cache-vignettes/L300xH300/illustration_actad_2012_09_eva_300-8eaa4.jpg?1404643186

• IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4

• Differ in number of disulfide bonds

• Type of antibody found in human circulation

• Protects body from infection by targeting 

and binding to antigens

• Different subclasses

• A protein produced by the bacterium 

Streptomyces avidinii

• Tetrameric

• Extremely high affinity for biotin
Motivation

• Structure of antigen-antibody complexes is important for understanding how 

they form and their effect in the immune system

• A software framework developed at the NCNR lacks experimental data for its 

docking module

https://commons.wikivet.net/images/thumb/d/db/LH_IgG.png/250px-LH_IgG.png

 Goal: to analyze how two subclasses of immunoglobulin G, IgG1 and IgG2, 

interact with the protein streptavidin and determine the structure of complexes

 Goal: to provide substantial data & results to improve functionality
Size-exclusion chromatography with multiangle light scattering

(SEC-MALS)

• Varying concentration ratios, pH to evaluate best conditions for 

complex formation

• Series of buffer exchanges

http://www.materials-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/MALS-mutli-angle-light-scattering-in-flow.jpg
Obtain a “pure and monodisperse” complex

Concentration Ratio .50 (strep:IgG1) Concentration Ratio 5.0 (strep:IgG2)

pH 6.5 buffer

Results Fitting Results Fitting
Streptavidin-IgG1 Complex Samples Streptavidin-IgG2 Complex Samples

pH 6.5 buffer
1 2
Effects of Different pH

pH 6.5 buffer

pH 3.0 buffer

Aggregation occurs 

in pH 3.0 buffer

IgG2 Individual Sample
Conclusions from SEC-MALS

• Higher percentage of complex forms in a buffer with a more neutral pH

• 1.0 and 2.0 concentration ratios (strep:IgG) yield most complex

• Aggregation of IgG2 occurs in a more acidic environment
SAXS Profile

• Larger molecules scatter more 

at low intensity (q)

• Complex with 1:1 

concentration ratio scatters 

more than 2:1 complex
Future Work

Performing more small-angle scattering

Testing SASSIE Docking Module

• Software framework designed to create atomistic models of 

molecular systems and to compare small-angle scattering data from 

these models directly to experimental data
Acknowledgements

• Monica Castellanos

• Julie Borchers and Yamali Hernandez

• Marco Blanco Medina
Opinion filed February 26, 2009

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals

____________

No. 11-09-00048-CV

__________

 JOSS-I, L.P., Appellant

V.

 RIDDEL LAND & CATTLE CO. ET AL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 39th District Court

 Stonewall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 4477

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

JOSS-I, L.P. has filed in this court a motion to dismiss its appeal. JOSS-I contends that its

appeal is moot because the trial court has granted its motion for new trial. The motion is granted,

and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

February 26, 2009

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>


                          PRIDE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                   EXHIBIT 27
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                           ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X



The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the condensed
consolidated  financial statements for the nine months ended August 31, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Nov-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     Dec-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       aug-31-1997
<CASH>                             41,453
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      2,010,855
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        1,691,941
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   0
<PP&E>                             32,222,902
<DEPRECIATION>                     5,523,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     39,492,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              16,048,241
<BONDS>                            13,773,911
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                           3,991
<OTHER-SE>                         4,984,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       39,492,552
<SALES>                            11,431,515
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   12,536,423
<CGS>                              10,019,382
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      10,019,382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   474,887
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 1,330,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (970,406)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (970,406)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       (970,406)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (.49)

        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Cash Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rick L. Wessel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  November 7, 2008

/s/ Rick L. WesselRick L. Wessel
Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT



The Board of Directors
Micro General Corporation:


      We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 2-85485, 2-92490, 333-22240 and 333-64289) on Form S-8 of Micro General
Corporation of our report dated March 31, 1999, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Micro General Corporation as of December 31, 1998 and 1997,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1998, and the related schedule, which report appears in the
December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Micro General Corporation.







                                                                  KPMG LLP


Los Angeles, California
April 14, 1999
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT B IR B AHADUR

B ASNET, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 12-73815 Age n c y No. A099-910-284 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d April 22, 2015 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, B YB EE, a nd C HR ISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. B ir B aha dur B a sne t, a

native and c i tiz e n of Ne pa l, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism i ssing his a p p e a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c i sion de ny i ng his a pplic at ion for a s y lum , withholding of re m ova l, a

nd prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Agai nst Torture(“ C AT” ). W e have 

# FIL ED APR 29 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide n c e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings, a pply ing the sta

nda rds gove rning a d

ve rse c re dibility de te rm i nations c re ate d

by the REAL ID Ac t, a

nd we re vie w de novo que stions of la w. Shre stha v . Holde r , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40, 1048 (9th Cir. 2010). W e de ny the p e tition for re v i e w. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the B IA’ s a dve rse c re dibility de t e rm i nation, ba se d on the B IA’ s finding tha t B a sne t’ s m isre p re se ntat ions re ga rding his wife ’ s nam e on his visa

a pplic ation a

nd to im m igration offic i a ls signific antly unde rm ine d his c re dibility . Se e Singh v . Holde r , 638 F.3d 1264, 1272 (9th C i r. 2010) (“ lie s a nd fraudule nt doc um e nts whe n the y are no longe r ne c e s sa

ry for the im

m e d iate e sc a

pe from pe rse c ution do support a

n a dve rse infe re nc e ” ); Zamonov v . Holde r , 649 F.3d 969, 974 (9th C ir. 2011) (a ge nc y not c om pe lle d to a c c e pt pe titione r’ s e xpla nations for disc re pa

nc i e s). In the a

bse n c e of c re dible te stim ony , B a sne t’ s a sy lum an d withholding of rem o v a l c la im s fa il. Se e Farah v . Ashc roft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th C ir. 2003). B e c a use B a sne t’ s C AT c la im is ba se d on the sam e te stim ony the B IA found not c re dible , a

nd B a sne t doe s not point to a ny othe r e v ide nc e tha

t c o m pe ls the c onc lusion tha

t it is m ore like ly

tha n not he will betorture d if re t urne d to Ne pa l,

1 2 - 7 3 8 1 5 2his C AT c la i m a lso fa ils. Se e id. at 1156–57. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 2 - 7 3 8 1 5 3
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1558 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide that nonnative 

species in the United States shall not be treated as endangered species 

or threatened species for purposes of that Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2023 

Mr. MORAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide 

that nonnative species in the United States shall not 

be treated as endangered species or threatened species 

for purposes of that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saving America’s Vul5 nerable Endangered Species Act’’ or the ‘‘SAVES Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1558 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON TREATMENT OF NONNATIVE SPE2 CIES IN THE UNITED STATES AS ENDAN3 GERED SPECIES OR THREATENED SPECIES. 

4 (a) LIMITATION.—Section 13 of the Endangered Spe5 cies Act of 1973 (relating to amendments to other laws, 

6 which have executed) is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘LIMITATION ON TREATMENT OF CERTAIN SPECIES AS

8 ENDANGERED SPECIES OR THREATENED SPECIES

9 ‘‘SEC. 13. 

10 ‘‘(a) LIMITATION.—The species described in sub11 section (b) shall not be treated as endangered species or 

12 threatened species for purposes of this Act. 

13 ‘‘(b) COVERED SPECIES.—The species referred to in 

14 subsection (a) are species in the United States that are 

15 not native to the United States.’’. 

16 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con17 tents in the first section of such Act is amended by strik18 ing the item relating to section 13 and inserting the fol19 lowing: 

‘‘Sec. 13. Limitation on treatment of certain species as endangered species or 

threatened species.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS