alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 149 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 149

   To prohibit the disbursement of Federal funds to State and local 
 governments that allow individuals who are not citizens of the United 
        States to vote in any Federal, State, or local election.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

   Mr. Duncan (for himself, Mr. Balderson, Mr. Banks, Mr. Biggs, Mr. 
  Bishop of North Carolina, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Buck, Mr. Calvert, Mrs. 
    Cammack, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Davidson, Mr. 
Finstad, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Gallagher, Mr. Good of Virginia, Mr. Gosar, Mr. 
    Guest, Mrs. Harshbarger, Mr. Jackson of Texas, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. 
 McHenry, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mrs. Miller-Meeks, Mr. Norman, Mr. 
 Perry, Mr. Pfluger, Mr. Posey, Mr. Reschenthaler, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. 
  Rutherford, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Ms. Tenney, Mr. 
Timmons, Mr. Waltz, Mr. Weber of Texas, and Mr. Womack) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                             Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the disbursement of Federal funds to State and local 
 governments that allow individuals who are not citizens of the United 
        States to vote in any Federal, State, or local election.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Our Democracy by 
Preventing Foreign Citizens from Voting Act''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL PAYMENT RESTRICTION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
Federal funds may be made available to any State or local government if 
such State or local government allows individuals who are not citizens 
of the United States to vote in any Federal, State, or local election.
    (b)  Certification.--Upon application, approval, and receipt of any 
Federal funds, a State or local government shall certify that the State 
or local government does not permit individuals who are not citizens of 
the United States to vote in any Federal, State, or local election.
    (c) Applicability.--The requirements of this section shall only 
apply with respect to any contract entered into or grant made on or 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
11351.

#### Abercrombie *v.*Henry County Drainage District No. 1.

Broyles, C. J.

1. None of the excerpts from the charge of the court excepted to, when considered in connection with the entire charge, contains material error.

2. The issue in this case was wholly one of fact, to wit, whether the land of the plaintiff in error was properly included in the drainage district as surveyed and reported upon in accordance with the law (Ga. L. 1911, *310p. 108) ; and upon the hearing of her objections to the report of the viewers, and the de novo hearing upon appeal to the superior court, the jury were authorized to find that her lands would be benefitted by the proposed drainage canal, that the ditch already upon her land was insufficient to properly drain it, and that the construction of the new canal through her land was essential to the complete drainage project for the betterment of the health of the community and the proper drainage and improvement of the other lands included in that drainage district.

Decided May 11, 1920.

Appeal; from Henry superior court'—Judge Searcy. January 19, 1920.

*Brown & Brown,*for plaintiff in error.

*Reagan & Reagan,*contra.

3. The question as to whether the lands of the plaintiff in error were improperly classified in the report of the viewers, in that all her lands should have been put in the lowest class, was not raised by the pleadings in the case. Furthermore, it does not appear from the record that this was one of the issues upon the trial; nor is such question raised in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial, and the only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is as to the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial. This question, therefore, can not be considered by this court.

4. The court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
**EXHIBIT10.31**

** AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENTAGREEMENT FOR BOBBY PURKAIT**

 

Summary of Amendment

Mr.Purkait's employment agreement provided he would transfer from full time to a parttime (50%), interim position, at 60% base pay starting April 1, 2004.  In addition, it indicated his final day ofemployment would be May 31, 2004.  InMarch 2004, this agreement was verbally amended to make his employment for anindeterminate period, to resume his full-time duties and to continue hiscompensation  at his base salary of $278,460 annually.  In addition, he would be eligible for additionalcompensation up to $200,000 upon the achievement of certain milestones.  The other terms of his employment agreementdated February 18, 2004 remain in effect.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 17, 2019

b1010 

# Order

Clerk October 17, 2019

159263

- 6 & (240)

IVY ALICE WIMMER, f/k/a IVY ALICE

MONTANO,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 159263, 159264, 159265 &

159266

COA: 340339, 340409, 340830 &

340996

Oakland CC: 2012

- 802216

- DO

MARIO ALLAN MONTANO,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to

cor rect the record and for other relief is DENIED.
#### Hong MAI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John DOE, Defendant, *16Chief of the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 00-7266.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 11, 2001.

Hong Mai, Richmond Hill, NY, pro se.

Larry Sonnenhein, Corporation Counsel’s Office City of New York, New York, NY, for appellee.

Present NEWMAN, CABRANES, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Alvin W. Thompson of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and is AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff Hong Mai appeals from a judgment of the District Court, entered on February 14, 2000, granting defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The District Court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint because the complaint did not raise a federal question or allege diversity of citizenship. We agree and therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.
EXHIBIT 32.2



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of The InterGroup Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David T. Nguyen, Treasurer and Controller of the Company,
serving as Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: September 28, 2006                        /s/ David T. Nguyen
                                                ----------------------------
                                                David T. Nguyen, Treasurer
                                                and Controller (serving as
                                                Chief Financial Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The InterGroup Corporation, Inc. and will be retained by The
InterGroup Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Harriet Vaugh, et al., *v.*J. H. Neeley.

Judicial Sale — Mortgage Foreclosure — Judgment—Descriptions.

A judgment for the sale of land will be reversed where it does not in itself contain such a description of the land as will enable the master to find it without reference to the title papers.

APPEAL, FROM CUMBERLAND CIRCUIT COURT.

February 27, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

The evidence is insufficient to authorize the interference of the chancellor on the ground that the appellant, Harriet Vaugh, was, by duress or intimidation, induced to execute the mortgage. Nor can the contract be avoided on the ground that it was a compounding of a felony. Neeley swears that he never made any such charge against O. C. Vaugh, that he neither obtained nor applied for a warrant against him on any charge whatever.

Haggard proves he was a justice of the peace for Cumberland county, has some vague recollection of having issued a warrant against O. C. Vaughn, but has no recollection of what the charge was against him; he supposes it was issued upon the application and affidavit of some one, perhaps Neeley, but cannot certainly say; the process, wjhatever it was, has never been returned. And Baker, the constable, had some kind of process against him, but cannot say what it was, as he never read it. He went to Vaughan’s once, and walked away and did not execute it. There is nothing, therefore, definite, or approximating to that certainty upon which to found judicial action.

But the judgment must be reversed for a failure to identify the land to be sold. This court has repeatedly held that a judgment for *391the sale of land must, in itself, contain such a description of the land as will enable the master to find it without reference to the title papers. In this judgment, the master directed to sell the land described in the mortgage, or so much thereof as will pay the debt. And when that instrument is examined, it purports “The following described property,” viz., lying on the left hand side of the Burks-ville & Lexington road about one mile -and a fourth south of Burks-ville, beginning at the division line between Martin Baker and James Gilmon, at the river, thence, to the old Henry Carg corner, on the river, thence, to a branch on the left hand branch of said road, thence, with the meanders of the branch, to the division line, thence, with said division line to the beginning.

*Spenser & Allen, for appellants.*

*Craddock & Wpiker, for appellee.*

No courses nor distances are given; no place is identified as the beginning corner, and it would be impossible to find the land even with or without a surveyor. No quantity is named.

The judgment must be *reversed*and the cause remanded with directions for other proceedings consistent herewith.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CEO PURSUANT TO**

 

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

**AsAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the report of Gaiam, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the U.S. Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jirka Rysavy,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)     The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)     The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  March 17, 2008

 
|        | /s/ Jirka Rysavy                                  |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   | Jirka Rysavy                                      |
|   | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AT 12/31/96, THE CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED 12/31/96 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,576,276
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    545,757
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         271,576
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       304,606
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,698,215
<COMMON>                                       691,853
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        2,210
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            277,234
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 971,297
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           65,000
<PREFERRED>                                     57,654
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           627,057
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              70,500
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        4,662
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  34,202
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   68,548
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      1,620
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   720
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 796,955
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,698,215
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      973,208
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            71,975
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     736,970
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     808,945
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        164,263
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               3,893
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 168,156
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        48,770
<NET-INCOME>                                   119,386
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      7,705
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  111,681
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        87,432
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       42,719
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         217,293
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.03
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                     [LETTERHEAD OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP]


                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(a)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 333-29757 of Bay View Capital Corporation on Form S-3 of our
report dated January 24, 1997 (June 2, 1997 as to paragraphs 3, 4, and 5 of Note
24), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Bay View Capital
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1996 and to the reference to us
under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus, which is a part of this
Registration Statement.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Francisco, California
August 11, 1997
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

BREON T. DAVIS , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2011

[ November 30, 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Paul L. Backman

, Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 09

- 003309CF10B, 09

- 005099CF10A and 11

- 008711 CF10A

.
Breon T. Davis, DeFuniak Springs, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

L EVINE , C ONNER , and K UNT Z , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
---



Exhibit 10.2



AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED 
EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF RICK L. WESSEL

This is the First Amendment ("First Amendment") to the First Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement of Rick L. Wessel originally entered into as of October 16, 2007 (the "Agreement"), by and between First Cash Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company"), a Delaware corporation, and Rick L. Wessel (the "Executive").  This First Amendment shall apply prospectively and is effective as of January 1, 2010.



WHEREAS, Executive is presently serving the Company as an employee pursuant to the Agreement between the parties (said Agreement including all previous amendments and/or addenda, if any), and the parties desire to modify the Agreement as set forth below.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and obligations hereinafter set forth, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

|1. | In paragraph 4 of the Agreement, replace the term "December 31, 2012" with "December 31, 2015."                                                                           
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | In paragraph 7(a) of the Agreement, replace the content of section (iii) with the following:  "(iii) be payable at the annual rate of $850,000 beginning January 1, 2010."
|   |                                                                                                                                                                           
|3. | In paragraph 8(d) of the Agreement, add the phrase "and tax" between the terms "accounting" and "services", and change the sum "$700" to "$3,000".                        
|   |                                                                                                                                                                           
|4. | Except as modified herein, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.                                                                                         

EXECUTIVE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT HE HAS BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS THIS FIRST AMENDMENT WITH HIS PRIVATE LEGAL COUNSEL AND HAS AVAILED HIMSELF OF THAT OPPORTUNITY.



|First Cash Financial Services, Inc. |  | Executive                     
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|                                    |  |                               
|By:_____________________________    |  | ______________________________
|Philip E. Powell                    |  | Rick L. Wessel                
|Chairman of the Board               |  |
11449.

#### Currie *v.*The State.

Decided June 15, 1920.

Application for change of venue; from Toombs superior court — Judge Hardeman. March 19, 1920.

*Giles & Sharpe,*for plaintiff in error.

*Walter F. Grey, solicitor-general, Lankford & Rogers,*contra.

Luke, J.

On the hearing of the motion to change the venue in this case, wherein the defendant was charged with murder, there was evidence that he could get a fair trial in the county in which it was alleged that he committed the crime, and that he would be in no danger of bodily harm; and, from a careful examination of the record, this court can not say that the judge who heard the evidence and denied the motion abused the discretion with which he is by law charged.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Broyles, *C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
---



Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Cash Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rick L. Wessel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  August 6, 2007



/s/ Rick L. WesselRick L. Wessel
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

** **

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-37700) pertaining to the Gaiam, Inc.1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Gaiam, Inc. 1999 Employee StockPurchase Plan, of our report dated March 15, 2006, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and schedule of Gaiam, Inc.included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2005.

 
|   | /s/ Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Denver, Colorado

March 15, 2006

 

----
Exhibit 10.3


 


Summary Translation of Loan Agreement


 


Debtor: Top Favour Limited


 


Creditor: Capital Paradise Limited


 


Entry date: 1/26/2015


 


Loan period: 1/28/2015-1/27/2016


 


Loan amount: $2,408,000


 


Interest rate: 7% (higher than the
bank loan year interest rate standard of People’s Bank of China in the same period)


 


Repay method: Debtor can repay the
principal in RMB or US Dollar. In case Creditor needs to withdraw capital under urgent circumstances, Creditor should notify Debtor
7 days in advance.


 


Both parties agree on turning to arbitration
in case of any disputes raised under the Agreement.


 


If any of the parties requests
a modification or termination of the agreement, that party should give the other party written notification and the two
parties shall reach written agreement.


 


The modification of the agreement reached
by both of the parties will have same legal effect as the original agreement.