alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,276,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                   217,468
<INVENTORY>                                    389,072
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,022,628
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,143,000
<COMMON>                                       449,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (22,116,749)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,022,628
<SALES>                                        26,602,198
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          24,209,784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  32,375,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               11,100,507
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,391,232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (20,265,544)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (20,372,914)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.32)



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6806

VICTOR COLLYN GREENE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARSHA MALOFF; THOMAS R. CORCORAN; JOEL N.

BADGER; JEFFREY MYERS; CURTIS W. HENSON, Correctional Officer; JOHN C. STEVENS, Captain;

TAMMIE L. KIEL, Correctional Officer; JESSE D.

WIGGINS, Lieutenant; CRAIG W. BLANK, Correctional Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-95-2987-JFM)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victor Collyn Greene, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney

General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district

court. Greene v. Maloff, No. CA-95-2987-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 24, 1996).

We also note that Appellant's Eighth Amendment claim was properly

dismissed for failure to provide evidence of a serious or significant injury or a substantial risk of serious harm. Shakka v. Smith,

71 F.3d 162, 166 (4th Cir. 1995). We deny Appellant's motions for

suspension of rules, remand, counsel and consolidation. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the report of Activeworlds Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sean
Deson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of tHE
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                           /s/ Sean Deson
                           ---------------------------------------------------
                           Sean Deson
                           Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                           Date: March 28, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4624 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

4960 West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the 

‘‘Ray Charles Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2004 

Ms. WATSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4960 West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the ‘‘Ray Charles Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RAY CHARLES POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 4960 West Washington Boule6 vard in Los Angeles, California, shall be known and des7 ignated as the ‘‘Ray Charles Post Office Building’’. 
2 

•HR 4624 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the Ray Charles Post Office 

5 Building. 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 150 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 150

      To prohibit a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

 Mr. Duncan (for himself, Mr. Reschenthaler, Mr. Perry, Mr. Estes, Mr. 
Weber of Texas, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Norman, Mr. 
 Jackson of Texas, Mr. Carl, Mr. Stauber, Mr. Kustoff, Mr. Armstrong, 
 and Mr. Womack) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To prohibit a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting American Energy 
Production Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTING AMERICAN ENERGY PRODUCTION.

    (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that States 
should maintain primacy for the regulation of hydraulic fracturing for 
oil and natural gas production on State and private lands.
    (b) Prohibition on Declaration of a Moratorium on Hydraulic 
Fracturing.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the President 
may not declare a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing unless 
such moratorium is authorized by an Act of Congress.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
10.1.1





Terms of
January 2008 Amendment to Employment Agreement


between
Bay National Bank and Hugh W. Mohler








On
January 22, 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Bay
National Bank increased, effective January 1, 2008, Hugh Mohler’s annual base
compensation from $240,000 to $255,000.





Also, the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Bank approved a
discretionary bonus to Mr. Mohler of $10,000 in January 2008 (the agreement is
silent with respect to the payment of bonuses to Mr. Mohler). This bonus was
paid in February 2008.
Page 1 of 2

Scope of Work Relating to Forensic Footwear and/or 

Tire Tread Examiners (03/2005)

1. Scope

1.1 This description covers, in general, the duties of forensic footwear and/or tire 

tread examiners.

2. Job Description

2.1 The forensic footwear and/or tire tread examiner collects and preserves footwear 

and tire tread evidence, makes scientific examinations, comparisons, and analyses 

of footwear and/or tire tread impression evidence in order to:

• include, identify, or eliminate a shoe or tire as the source of an impression;

• determine the brand or manufacturer of a shoe or tire;

• link scenes of crime;

• write reports and provide testimony as needed.

3. General Duties

General duties in this field include, but are not limited to:

3.1 Detection of footwear and/or tire impressions

3.2 Collection and recovery of footwear and/or tire impression evidence

3.3 Preservation of foot wear and/or tire evidence

3.4 Documentation of footwear and/or tire evidence

3.5 Collection of elimination prints from footwear and/or tires

3.6 Physical, chemical, photographic, and digital enhancement of impressions

3.7 Photography of footwear and/or tire evidence

3.8 Lifting of footwear and/or tire impression evidence

3.9 Casting of footwear and/or tire impression evidence
SWGTREAD Page 2 of 2

Scope of Work Relating to Forensic Footwear and/or Tire Tread Examiners (03/2005)

3.10 Preparation of test impressions from shoes and/or tires

3.11 Recognition and preservation of other relevant physical evidence

3.12 Evaluation of footwear and/or tire tread evidence

3.13 Comparison of impressions to shoes and/or tires

3.14 Report writing

3.15 Preparation of court exhibits

3.16 Court testimony

3.17 Familiarity with and utilization of reference materials and databases

3.18 Providing training for nonexaminers

3.19 Knowledge and use of relevant technical equipment
**EXHIBIT 32** **CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.' 1350**
     Solelyfor the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ' 1350, I, theundersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Pierre Foods, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge*,*that the Annual Report onForm 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 1, 2003 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. /S/ NORBERT E. WOODHAMSNorbert E. WoodhamsMarch 9, 2004
     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.' 1350, I, theundersigned Chief Financial Officer of Pierre Foods, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify, based on my knowledge*,*that the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofthe Company for the year ended March 1, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthat information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /S/ PAMELA M. WITTERSPamela M. WittersMarch 9, 2004
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Pierre Foods, Inc. and will be retained by Pierre Foods, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

Filed 4/19/23 P. v. Ayobi CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

SHAJIA AYOBI,

Defendant and Appellant. C096935

(Super. Ct. No. 12F00488)

Defendant Shajia Ayobi appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for

resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6. 1 Counsel filed a brief raising no arguable

issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 ( Delgadillo ) and requesting we

exercise our discretion to review the entire record for arguable issues on appeal.

On February 1 , 2023, we notified defendant: 1) counsel had filed a brief

indicating no arguable issues had been identified; 2) as a case arising from an order

1 Defendant filed his petition under Penal Code former section 1170.95. Effective

June 30, 2022, the Legislature renumbered Penal Code former section 1170.95 to

section 1172.6. (Stats. 2022, ch. 58, § 10.)2

denying postconviction relief, defendant was not entitled to counsel or to an independent

review of the record ; and 3) in accordance with th e procedures set forth in Delgadillo

,

defendant had 30 days in which to file a supplemental brief or letter raising any argument

he wanted this court to consider. In addition, we notified defendant if we did not receive

a letter or brief within that 30

- da y period, the court may dismiss the appeal as abandoned.

More than 30 days elapsed and we received no communication from defendant.

We consider defendant’s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed.

( Delgadillo

, supra

, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)

DISPOS ITION

The appeal is dismissed.

/S/

MAURO, Acting P. J.

We concur:

/S/

KRAUSE, J.

/S/

MESIWALA, J.
EX-10.10



 Exhibit 10.10 
  





 
 BioTie Therapies Corp. 

Tykistökatu 6 
 20520 Turku 

Finland 
 H. Lundbeck A/S 

Ottiliavej 9 
 DK 2500 Valby 

Denmark 
 RE: LETTER OF CONFIRMATION WHICH SHALL CONSTITUTE
THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE LICENSE AND COMMERCIALISATION AGREEMENT 
 Dear Sirs, 

BioTie Therapies Corp. (“BioTie”) and H. Lundbeck A/S (“Lundbeck”) entered on 23 May 2007 into a License and Commercialisation
Agreement (hereinafter the “Agreement”) regarding the commercialisation of Nalmefene, a specific opioid receptor antagonist developed by BioTie and its collaborators for the treatment of substance abuse disorders such as alcoholism and
obsessive compulsive disorders, including but not limited to pathological gambling. 
 Lundbeck has desired to make an exempt from the confidentiality and
non-disclosure provision for the benefit of certain potential co-promotion partners of Lundbeck, which BioTie hereby acknowledges. 

This letter of confirmation shall constitute the fifth amendment to the Agreement. 

Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure 
 BioTie acknowledges
and agrees that Lundbeck may enter into discussions with potential co-promotion partners, and for that purpose needs to release information under confidentiality provisions. BioTie also acknowledges and agrees
that the Term of such confidentiality provisions may be limited to a period of 10 (ten) years from the Effective Date of an executed confidentiality provision. After Lundbeck receives a final signed confidentiality provision from a potential
partner, Lundbeck shall inform BioTie in writing with the name of the potential partner. For the sake of clarity, this information is covered by existing confidentiality between Lundbeck and Biotie. 

Sub-Licensees 
 For the sake of clarity, it is declared
that any afore-mentioned co-promotion partners shall be deemed Sub-Licensees of Lundbeck in the event that Lundbeck would subsequently enter into an agreement with such party for the rights to research, develop, make (and have made), use, sell,
offer for sale, import or export any Product. 

  
 1 








 Entry into force 

The additions and clarifications to the Agreement constituted by this letter shall become effective when Lundbeck has signed and returned a copy of this letter
to BioTie. 
 All other terms of the Agreement (including previous amendments, if still applicable) shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

 In Turku, Finland on this 7th day of October 2010 
 Yours
sincerely, 
  

	
	 /s/ Timo Veromaa

	 Timo Veromaa

	 President and CEO


 Signed for approval. 
 In
Copenhagen, Denmark on this 25th day of October 2010 
  

	
	 H. Lundbeck A/S

	
	 /s/ Ole Vahlgren

	 Name and title of signatory:

	 Ole Vahlgren

	 Senior VP



  
 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 19, 2014

h1112

Order 

Clerk

November 19, 2014

149363

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 149363

COA: 314110

Saginaw CC: 12-037025-FC

DARIUS LAMAR LEWIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 22, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.01

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Domestic                                                               Incorporated
--------                                                               ------------
<S>                                                                    <C>
Nashua International, Inc. (1)                                         Delaware
Nashua Photo European Investments, Inc. (2)                            Delaware
Nashua Photo Inc. (1)                                                  Delaware
Nashua Photo International Investments, Inc. (2)                       Delaware
Nashua P.R., Inc. (1)                                                  Delaware
Rittenhouse, LLC (1)                                                   Illinois
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Foreign                                                                Incorporated
-------                                                                ------------
<S>                                                                    <C>
Nashua FSC Limited (1)                                                 Jamaica
Nashua Photo B.V. (2)(4)                                               Netherlands
Nashua Imaging Supplies (UK) Limited (2)                               England
Nashua Photo S.N.C. (3) (4)                                            France
</TABLE>


---------------

(1)      Stock held by Nashua Corporation.

(2)      Stock held by Nashua Photo Inc.

(3)      Stock held 99.9% by Nashua Photo European Investments, Inc. and .1% by
         Nashua Photo International Investments, Inc.

(4)      In liquidation.



---------------

NOTE:    Nashua Corporation has certificates representing 15% of Multitek, S.A.
         de C.V. (Mexico).

         Nashua Corporation owns a 37% interest in Cerion Technologies
         Liquidating Trust.

         Nashua Corporation owns a 39% interest in Labelnet, S.A. de C.V.
         (Mexico).
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**Pursuant      to**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As      Adopted pursuant to**

**Section      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| Date:                May 31, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Zeynep Hakimoglu                                                              |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |   | Zeynep                Hakimoglu                                                                  |
|                              |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal                Executive Officer) |

**A      signed original of the written statement above required by Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to ClearOne Communications, Inc.      and will be retained by ClearOne Communications, Inc. and furnished to the      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon      request.**
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE

(For Revocation of Supervised Release)

v.

Case Number: 1:11-CR-00357-001

CHRISTOPHER DESHON HUBBARD USM Number: 50281-179

Christopher Knight, Esquire

Defendant’s Attorney

THE DEFENDANT:

admitted guilt to violation of the statutory condition and standard condition #7 of the terms of supervision as set forth in the 

Petition dated 10/24/2016.

was found in violation of condition(s) after denial of guilt.

The defendant is adjudicated guilty of these violations:

Violation Number Nature of Violation Violation Ended

Statutory

7

New offenses of driving under the influence of a controlled substance and possession of a 

controlled substance

Technical

09/29/2016

The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 2 of this judgment. The sentence is imposed pursuant to the Sentencing 

Reform Act of 1984.

The defendant has not violated condition(s) ________________________ and is discharged as to such violation(s) condition.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States Attorney for this district within 30 days of any 

change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are 

fully paid. If ordered to pay restitution, the defendant must notify the court and United States Attorney of material changes in 

economic circumstances.

 

November 8, 2016

Date of Imposition of Judgment

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

Signature of Judge

CALLIE V. S. GRANADE

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Name and Title of Judge

November 9, 2016

Date

Case 1:11-cr-00357-CG Document 38 Filed 11/09/16 Page 1 of 2
AO 245D (SDAL 01/16) Judgment in a Criminal Case Judgment -- Page 2 of 2

DEFENDANT: CHRISTOPHER DESHON HUBBARD

CASE NUMBER: 1:11-CR-00357-001

IMPRISONMENT

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a total term of:

EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS.

The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons:

The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district:

at a.m. p.m. on 

as notified by the United States Marshal.

The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons:

before 2 p.m. on 

as notified by the United States Marshal.

as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office.

RETURN

I have executed this judgment as follows:

Defendant delivered on to 

at , with a certified copy of this judgment.

 

UNITED STATES MARSHAL

By 

DEPUTY UNITED STATES MARSHAL

Case 1:11-cr-00357-CG Document 38 Filed 11/09/16 Page 2 of 2