Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary 14 CFR Chs. I-III
23 CFR Chs. I-III
33 CFR Chs. I and IV
46 CFR Chs. I-III
48 CFR Ch. 12
49 CFR Subtitle A, Chs. I-VI, and Chs. X-XII
[OST Docket 99-5129]
 AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.
 ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda.
 SUMMARY: The Regulatory Agenda is a semiannual summary of all current and projected rulemakings, reviews of existing regulations, and completed actions of the Department. The intent of the Agenda is to provide the public with information about the Department of Transportation's regulatory activity planned for the next 12 months. It is expected that this information will enable the public to be more aware of and allow it to more effectively participate in the Department's regulatory activity. The public is also invited to submit comments on any aspect of this Agenda.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: General You should direct all comments and inquiries on the Agenda in general to Brett Jortland, Acting Assistant General Counsel for Regulation and Enforcement, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; (202) 366-4723. Specific You should direct all comments and inquiries on particular items in the Agenda to the individual listed for the regulation or the general rulemaking contact person for the operating administration in appendix B. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call (202) 755-7687. Table of Contents Supplementary Information: Background Significant/Priority Rulemakings Explanation of Information on the Agenda Request for Comments Purpose Appendix A—Instructions for Obtaining Copies of Regulatory Documents Appendix B—General Rulemaking Contact Persons Appendix C—Public Rulemaking Dockets Appendix D—Review Plans for Section 610 and Other Requirements


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Background Improvement of our regulations is a prime goal of the Department of Transportation (Department or DOT). Our regulations should be clear, simple, timely, fair, reasonable, and necessary. They should not be issued without appropriate involvement of the public; once issued, they should be periodically reviewed and revised, as needed, to assure that they continue to meet the needs for which they originally were designed. To view additional information about the Department's regulatory activities online, go to 
                        *http://www.dot.gov/​regulations.*
                         Among other things, this Web site provides a report, updated monthly, on the status of the DOT significant rulemakings listed in the semiannual regulatory agenda. To help the Department achieve these goals, and in accordance with Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review,” (58 FR 51735; Oct. 4, 1993) and the Department's Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; Feb. 26, 1979), the Department prepares a semiannual regulatory agenda. It summarizes all current and projected rulemakings, reviews of existing regulations, and completed actions of the Department. These are matters on which action has begun or is projected during the succeeding 12 months or such longer period as may be anticipated or for which action has been completed since the last Agenda. The Agendas are based on reports submitted by the offices initiating the rulemaking and are reviewed by OST. The Internet is the basic means for disseminating the Unified Agenda. The complete Unified Agenda is available online at 
                        *www.reginfo.gov,*
                         in a format that offers users a greatly enhanced ability to obtain information from the Agenda database. Because publication in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         is mandated for the regulatory flexibility agendas required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 602), DOT's printed Agenda entries include only: 1. The agency's Agenda preamble; 2. Rules that are in the agency's regulatory flexibility agenda, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, because they are likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities; and 3. Any rules that the agency has identified for periodic review under section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Printing of these entries is limited to fields that contain information required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act's Agenda requirements. These elements are: Sequence Number; Title; Section 610 Review, if applicable; Legal Authority; Abstract; Timetable; Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required; Agency Contact; and Regulation Identifier Number (RIN). Additional information (for detailed list, see section heading “Explanation of Information on the Agenda”) on these entries is available in the Unified Agenda published on the Internet. Significant/Priority Rulemakings The Agenda covers all rules and regulations of the Department. We have classified rules as a DOT agency priority in the Agenda if they are, essentially, very beneficial, controversial, or of substantial public interest under our Regulatory Policies and Procedures. All DOT agency priority rulemaking documents are subject to review by the Secretary of Transportation. If the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) decided a rule is subject to its review under Executive Order 12866, we have classified it as significant in the Agenda. Explanation of Information on the Agenda An Office of Management and Budget memorandum, dated August 25, 2014, requires the format for this Agenda. First, the Agenda is divided by initiating offices. Then, the Agenda is divided into five categories: (1) Prerule stage, (2) proposed rule stage, (3) final rule stage, (4) long-term actions, and (5) completed actions. For each entry, the Agenda provides the following information: (1) Its “significance”; (2) a short, descriptive title; (3) its legal basis; (4) the related regulatory citation in the Code of Federal Regulations; (5) any legal deadline and, if so, for what action (
                        *e.g.,*
                         NPRM, final rule); (6) an abstract; (7) a timetable, including the earliest expected date for a decision on whether to take the action; (8) whether the rulemaking will affect small entities and/or levels of Government and, if so, which categories; (9) whether a Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) analysis is required (for rules that would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities); (10) a listing of any analyses an office 
                        ( print page 76753)
                        will prepare or has prepared for the action (with minor exceptions, DOT requires an economic analysis for all its rulemakings); (11) an agency contact office or official who can provide further information; (12) a Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) assigned to identify an individual rulemaking in the Agenda and facilitate tracing further action on the issue; (13) whether the action is subject to the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act; (14) whether the action is subject to the Energy Act; and (15) whether the action is major under the congressional review provisions of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. If there is information that does not fit in the other categories, it will be included under a separate heading entitled “Additional Information.” One such example of this is the letters “SB,” “IC,” and “SLT.” These refer to information used as part of our required reports on Retrospective Review of DOT rulemakings. A “Y” or an “N,” for yes and no, respectively, follow the letters to indicate whether or not a particular rulemaking would have effects on: Small businesses (SB); information collections (IC); or State, local, or tribal (SLT) governments. For nonsignificant regulations issued routinely and frequently as a part of an established body of technical requirements (such as the Federal Aviation Administration's Airspace Rules), to keep those requirements operationally current, we only include the general category of the regulations, the identity of a contact office or official, and an indication of the expected number of regulations; we do not list individual regulations. In the “Timetable” column, we use abbreviations to indicate the particular documents being considered. ANPRM stands for Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, SNPRM for Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, and NPRM for Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Listing a future date in this column does not mean we have made a decision to issue a document; it is the earliest date on which we expect to make a decision on whether to issue it. In addition, these dates are based on current schedules. Information received subsequent to the issuance of this Agenda could result in a decision not to take regulatory action or in changes to proposed publication dates. For example, the need for further evaluation could result in a later publication date; evidence of a greater need for the regulation could result in an earlier publication date. Finally, a dot (•) preceding an entry indicates that the entry appears in the Agenda for the first time. Request for Comments General Our agenda is intended primarily for the use of the public. Since its inception, we have made modifications and refinements that we believe provide the public with more helpful information, as well as make the Agenda easier to use. We would like you, the public, to make suggestions or comments on how the Agenda could be further improved. Reviews We also seek your suggestions on which of our existing regulations you believe need to be reviewed to determine whether they should be revised or revoked. We particularly draw your attention to the Department's review plan in appendix D. In response to Executive Order 13563 “Retrospective Review and Analysis of Existing Rules,” we have prepared a retrospective review plan providing more detail on the process we use to conduct reviews of existing rules, including changes in response to Executive Order 13563. We provided the public opportunities to comment at 
                        *www.regulations.gov*
                         and Idea Scale on both our process and any existing DOT rules the public thought needed review. The plan and the results of our review can be found at 
                        *http://www.dot.gov/​regulations*
                         and 
                        *http://www.dot.gov/​mission/​open/​open-government.* Regulatory Flexibility Act The Department is especially interested in obtaining information on requirements that have a “significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities” and, therefore, must be reviewed under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. If you have any suggested regulations, please submit them to us, along with your explanation of why they should be reviewed. In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, comments are specifically invited on regulations that we have targeted for review under section 610 of the Act. The phrase (sec. 610 Review) appears at the end of the title for these reviews. Please see appendix D for the Department's section 610 review plans. Consultation With State, Local, and Tribal Governments Executive Orders 13132 and 13175 require us to develop an accountable process to ensure “meaningful and timely input” by State, local, and tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have federalism or tribal implications. These policies are defined in the Executive Orders to include regulations that have “substantial direct effects” on States or Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and them, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and various levels of Government or Indian tribes. Therefore, we encourage State and local Governments or Indian tribes to provide us with information about how the Department's rulemakings impact them. Purpose The Department is publishing this regulatory Agenda in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         to share with interested members of the public the Department's preliminary expectations regarding its future regulatory actions. This should enable the public to be more aware of the Department's regulatory activity and should result in more effective public participation. This publication in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         does not impose any binding obligation on the Department or any of the offices within the Department with regard to any specific item on the Agenda. Regulatory action, in addition to the items listed, is not precluded. Dated: September 23, 2014. Anthony R. Foxx, Secretary of Transportation.
 Appendix A—Instructions for Obtaining Copies of Regulatory Documents To obtain a copy of a specific regulatory document in the Agenda, you should communicate directly with the contact person listed with the regulation at the address below. We note that most, if not all, such documents, including the Semiannual Regulatory Agenda, are available through the Internet at 
                        *http://www.regulations.gov.*
                         See appendix C for more information. (Name of contact person), (Name of the DOT agency), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. (For the Federal Aviation Administration, substitute the following address: Office of Rulemaking, ARM-1, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591). Appendix B—General Rulemaking Contact Persons The following is a list of persons who can be contacted within the Department for general information concerning the rulemaking process within the various operating administrations. FAA—Mark Bury, Chief Counsel, International Law, Legislation and Regulations Division, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Room 915A, Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-3110.
                        ( print page 76754) FHWA—Jennifer Outhouse, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-0761. FMCSA—Steven J. LaFreniere, Regulatory Ombudsman, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-0596. NHTSA—Steve Wood, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-2992. FRA—Kathryn Shelton, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W31-214, Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 493-6063. FTA—Bonnie Graves, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room E56-308, Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-0675. SLSDC—Carrie Mann Lavigne, Chief Counsel, 180 Andrews Street, Massena, NY 13662; telephone (315) 764-3200. PHMSA—Karin Christian, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-4400. MARAD—Christine Gurland, Office of Chief Counsel, Maritime Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-5157. OST—Brett Jortland, Office of Regulation and Enforcement, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-4723. Appendix C—Public Rulemaking Dockets All comments via the Internet are submitted through the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at the following address: 
                        *http://www.regulations.gov.*
                         The FDMS allows the public to search, view, download, and comment on all Federal agency rulemaking documents in one central online system. The above referenced Internet address also allows the public to sign up to receive notification when certain documents are placed in the dockets. The public also may review regulatory dockets at, or deliver comments on proposed rulemakings to, the Dockets Office at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590, 1-800-647-5527. Working Hours: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Appendix D—Review Plans for Section 610 and Other Requirements Part I—The Plan General The Department of Transportation has long recognized the importance of regularly reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether they need to be revised or revoked. Our 1979 Regulatory Policies and Procedures require such reviews. We also have responsibilities under Executive Order 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review,” and section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act to conduct such reviews. This includes the use of plain language techniques in new rules and considering its use in existing rules when we have the opportunity and resources to permit its use. We are committed to continuing our reviews of existing rules and, if needed, will initiate rulemaking actions based on these reviews. In accordance with Executive Order 13563, “Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,” issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department has added other elements to its review plan. The Department has decided to improve its plan by adding special oversight processes within the Department; encouraging effective and timely reviews, including providing additional guidance on particular problems that warrant review; and expanding opportunities for public participation. These new actions are in addition to the other steps described in this appendix. Section 610 Review Plan Section 610 requires that we conduct reviews of rules that: (1) Have been published within the last 10 years, and (2) have a “significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities” (SEIOSNOSE). It also requires that we publish in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         each year a list of any such rules that we will review during the next year. The Office of the Secretary and each of the Department's Operating Administrations have a 10-year review plan. These reviews comply with section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Changes to the Review Plan Some reviews may be conducted earlier than scheduled. For example, to the extent resources permit, the plain language reviews will be conducted more quickly. Other events, such as accidents, may result in the need to conduct earlier reviews of some rules. Other factors may also result in the need to make changes; for example, we may make changes in response to public comment on this plan or in response to a presidentially mandated review. If there is any change to the review plan, we will note the change in the following Agenda. For any section 610 review, we will provide the required notice prior to the review. Part II—The Review Process The Analysis Generally, the agencies have divided their rules into 10 different groups and plan to analyze one group each year. For purposes of these reviews, a year will coincide with the fall-to-fall schedule for publication of the Agenda. Thus, Year 1 (2008) begins in the fall of 2008 and ends in the fall of 2009; Year 2 (2009) begins in the fall of 2009 and ends in the fall of 2010, and so on. We request public comment on the timing of the reviews. For example, is there a reason for scheduling an analysis and review for a particular rule earlier than we have? Any comments concerning the plan or particular analyses should be submitted to the regulatory contacts listed in appendix B, General Rulemaking Contact Persons. Section 610 Review The agency will analyze each of the rules in a given year's group to determine whether any rule has a SEIOSNOSE and, thus, requires review in accordance with section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The level of analysis will, of course, depend on the nature of the rule and its applicability. Publication of agencies' section 610 analyses listed each fall in this Agenda provides the public with notice and an opportunity to comment consistent with the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We request that public comments be submitted to us early in the analysis year concerning the small entity impact of the rules to help us in making our determinations. In each fall Agenda, the agency will publish the results of the analyses it has completed during the previous year. For rules that had a negative finding on SEIOSNOSE, we will give a short explanation (
                        *e.g.,*
                         “these rules only establish petition processes that have no cost impact” or “these rules do not apply to any small entities”). For parts, subparts, or other discrete sections of rules that do have a SEIOSNOSE, we will announce that we will be conducting a formal section 610 review during the following 12 months. At this stage, we will add an entry to the Agenda in the prerulemaking section describing the review in more detail. We also will seek public comment on how best to lessen the impact of these rules and provide a name or docket to which public comments can be submitted. In some cases, the section 610 review may be part of another unrelated review of the rule. In such a case, we plan to clearly indicate which parts of the review are being conducted under section 610.
                        ( print page 76755) Other Reviews The agency will also examine the specified rules to determine whether any other reasons exist for revising or revoking the rule or for rewriting the rule in plain language. In each fall Agenda, the agency will also publish information on the results of the examinations completed during the previous year. Part III—List of Pending Section 610 Reviews The Agenda identifies the pending DOT section 610 Reviews by inserting “(Section 610 Review),” after the title for the specific entry. For further information on the pending reviews, see the Agenda entries at 
                        *www.reginfo.gov.*
                         For example, to obtain a list of all entries that are in section 610 Reviews under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, a user would select the desired responses on the search screen (by selecting “advanced search”) and, in effect, generate the desired “index” of reviews. Office of the Secretary Section 610 and Other Reviews Year
Regulations to be reviewed
Analysis year
Review year1
49 CFR parts 91 through 99 and 14 CFR parts 200 through 212
2008
20092
48 CFR parts 1201 through 1253 and new parts and subparts
2009
20103
14 CFR parts 213 through 232
2010
20114
14 CFR parts 234 through 254
2011
20125
14 CFR parts 255 through 298 and 49 CFR part 40
2012
20136
14 CFR parts 300 through 373
2013
20147
14 CFR parts 374 through 398
2014
20158
14 CFR part 399 and 49 CFR parts 1 through 11
2015
20169
49 CFR parts 17 through 28
2016
201710
49 CFR parts 29 through 39 and parts 41 through 89
2017
2018
 Year 1 (fall 2008) List of Rules With Ongoing Analysis 49 CFR part 91—International Air Transportation Fair Competitive Practices 49 CFR part 92—Recovering Debts to the United States by Salary Offset 49 CFR part 98—Enforcement of Restrictions on Post-Employment Activities 49 CFR part 99—Employee Responsibilities and Conduct 14 CFR part 200—Definitions and Instructions 14 CFR part 201—Air Carrier Authority Under Subtitle VII of Title 49 of the United States Code [Amended] 14 CFR part 203—Waiver of Warsaw Convention Liability Limits and Defenses 14 CFR part 204—Data to Support Fitness Determinations 14 CFR part 205—Aircraft Accident Liability Insurance 14 CFR part 206—Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity: Special Authorizations and Exemptions 14 CFR part 207—Charter Trips by U.S. Scheduled Air Carriers 14 CFR part 208—Charter Trips by U.S. Charter Air Carriers 14 CFR part 211—Applications for Permits to Foreign Air Carriers 14 CFR part 212—Charter Rules for U.S. and Foreign Direct Air Carriers Year 3 (fall 2010) List of Rules With Ongoing Analysis 14 CFR part 213—Terms, Conditions, and Limitations of Foreign Air Carrier Permits 14 CFR part 214—Terms, Conditions, and Limitations of Foreign Air Carrier Permits Authorizing Charter Transportation Only 14 CFR part 215—Use and Change of Names of Air Carriers, Foreign Air Carriers, and Commuter Air Carriers 14 CFR part 216—Commingling of Blind Sector Traffic by Foreign Air Carriers 14 CFR part 217—Reporting Traffic Statistics by Foreign Air Carriers in Civilian Scheduled, Charter, and Nonscheduled Services 14 CFR part 218—Lease by Foreign Air Carrier or Other Foreign Person of Aircraft With Crew 14 CFR part 221—Tariffs 14 CFR part 222—Intermodal Cargo Services by Foreign Air Carriers 14 CFR part 223—Free and Reduced-Rate Transportation 14 CFR part 232—Transportation of Mail, Review of Orders of Postmaster General 14 CFR part 234—Airline Service Quality Performance Reports Year 4 (fall 2011) List of Rules With Ongoing Analysis 14 CFR part 240—Inspection of Accounts and Property 14 CFR part 241—Uniform System of Accounts and Reports for Large Certificated Air Carriers 14 CFR part 243—Passenger Manifest Information 14 CFR part 247—Direct Airport-to-Airport Mileage Records 14 CFR part 248—Submission of Audit Reports 14 CFR part 249—Preservation of Air Carrier Records Year 5 (fall 2012) List of Rules With Ongoing Analysis 14 CFR part 255—Airline Computer Reservations Systems 14 CFR part 256—[Reserved] 14 CFR part 271—Guidelines for Subsidizing Air Carriers Providing Essential Air Transportation 14 CFR part 272—Essential Air Service to the Freely Associated States 14 CFR part 291—Cargo Operations in Interstate Air Transportation 14 CFR part 292—International Cargo Transportation 14 CFR part 293—International Passenger Transportation 14 CFR part 294—Canadian Charter Air Taxi Operators 14 CFR part 296—Indirect Air Transportation of Property 14 CFR part 297—Foreign Air Freight Forwarders and Foreign Cooperative Shippers Associations 14 CFR part 298—Exemptions for Air Taxi and Commuter Air Carrier Operations Year 6 (2013) List of Rules With Ongoing Analysis 14 CFR part 300—Rules of Conduct in DOT Proceedings Under This Chapter 14 CFR part 302—Rules of Practice in Proceedings 14 CFR part 303—Review of Air Carrier Agreements 14 CFR part 305—Rules of Practice in Informal Nonpublic Investigations 14 CFR part 313—Implementation of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act 14 CFR part 323—Terminations, Suspensions, and Reductions of Service 14 CFR part 325—Essential Air Service Procedures 14 CFR part 330—Procedures For Compensation of Air Carriers 14 CFR part 372—Overseas Military Personnel Charters
                        ( print page 76756) Year 7 (2014) List of Rules That Will Be Analyzed During the Next Year 14 CFR part 374—Implementation of the Consumer Credit Protection Act with Respect to Air Carriers and Foreign Air Carriers 14 CFR part 374a—Extension of Credit by Airlines to Federal Political Candidates 14 CFR part 375—Navigation of Foreign Civil Aircraft within the United States 14 CFR part 377—Continuance of Expired Authorizations by Operation of Law Pending Final Determination of Applications for Renewal Thereof 14 CFR part 380—Public Charters 14 CFR part 381—Special Event Tours 14 CFR part 382—Nondiscrimination On The Basis Of Disability in Air Travel 14 CFR part 383—Civil Penalties 14 CFR part 385—Staff Assignments and Review of Action under Assignments 14 CFR part 389—Fees and Charges for Special Services 14 CFR part 398—Guidelines for Individual Determinations of Basic Essential Air Service Federal Aviation Administration Section 610 Review Plan The FAA has elected to use the two-step, two-year process used by most DOT modes in past plans. As such, the FAA has divided its rules into 10 groups as displayed in the table below. During the first year (the “
                        *analysis year”*), all rules published during the previous 10 years within a 10% block of the regulations will be 
                        *analyzed*
                         to identify those with a SEIOSNOSE. During the second year (the “
                        *review year”*), each rule identified in the analysis year as having a SEIONOSE will be 
                        *reviewed*
                         in accordance with Section 610 (b) to determine if it should be continued without change or changed to minimize impact on small entities. Results of those reviews will be published in the DOT Semiannual Regulatory Agenda. Year
Regulations to be reviewed
Analysis year
Review year1
14 CFR parts 119 through 129 and parts 150 through 156
2008
20092
14 CFR parts 133 through 139 and parts 157 through 169
2009
20103
14 CFR parts 141 through 147 and parts 170 through 187
2010
20114
14 CFR parts 189 through 198 and parts 1 through 16
2011
20125
14 CFR parts 17 through 33
2012
20136
14 CFR parts 34 through 39 and parts 400 through 405
2013
20147
14 CFR parts 43 through 49 and parts 406 through 415
2014
20158
14 CFR parts 60 through 77
2015
20169
14 CFR parts 91 through 105
2016
201710
14 CFR parts 417 through 460
2017
2018
 Year 7 (2014) List of Rules Analyzed and Summary of Results 14 CFR part 43—Maintenance, Preventive maintenance, Rebuilding, and Alteration Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found no SEISNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FAA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 45—Identification and Registration Marking Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found no SEISNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FAA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 47—Aircraft Registration Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found no SEISNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FAA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 49—Recording of Aircraft Titles and Security Documents Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found no SEISNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FAA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 406—Investigations, Enforcement, and Administrative Review Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found no SEISNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FAA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 413—License Application Procedures Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found no SEISNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FAA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 414—Safety Approvals Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found no SEISNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FAA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 415—Launch License Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found no SEISNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FAA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. Year 8 (2015) List of Rules To Be Analyzed During the Next Year 14 CFR part 60—Flight Simulation Training Device Initial and Continuing Qualification and Use 14 CFR part 61—Certification: Pilots, Flight Instructors, and Ground Instructors 14 CFR part 63—Certification: Flight Crewmembers other than Pilots 14 CFR part 65—Certification: Airmen other than Flight Crewmembers 14 CFR part 67—Medical Standards and Certification 14 CFR part 71—Designation of Class A, B, C, D, and E Airspace Areas; Air Traffic Service Routes; and Reporting Points 14 CFR part 73—Special Use Airspace
                        ( print page 76757) 14 CFR part 77—Safe, Efficient Use, and Preservation of the Navigable Airspace Federal Highway Administration Section 610 and Other Reviews Year
Regulations to be reviewed
Analysis year
Review year1
None
2008
20092
23 CFR parts 1 to 260
2009
20103
23 CFR parts 420 to 470
2010
20114
23 CFR part 500
2011
20125
23 CFR parts 620 to 637
2012
20136
23 CFR parts 645 to 669
2013
20147
23 CFR parts 710 to 924
2014
20158
23 CFR parts 940 to 973
2015
20169
23 CFR parts 1200 to 1252
2016
201710
New parts and subparts
2017
2018
 Federal-Aid Highway Program The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has adopted regulations in title 23 of the CFR, chapter I, related to the Federal-Aid Highway Program. These regulations implement and carry out the provisions of Federal law relating to the administration of Federal aid for highways. The primary law authorizing Federal aid for highways is chapter I of title 23 of the U.S.C. 145 of title 23 expressly provides for a federally assisted State program. For this reason, the regulations adopted by the FHWA in title 23 of the CFR primarily relate to the requirements that States must meet to receive Federal funds for the construction and other work related to highways. Because the regulations in title 23 primarily relate to States, which are not defined as small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the FHWA believes that its regulations in title 23 do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The FHWA solicits public comment on this preliminary conclusion. Year 6 (fall 2013) List of Rules Analyzed and a Summary of Results 23 CFR part 645—Utilities Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 23 CFR part 646—Railroads Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 23 FR part 650—Bridges, structures, and hydraulics Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 23 CFR part 652—Pedestrian and bicycle accommodations and projects Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 23 CFR part 655—Traffic operations Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 23 CFR part 656—Carpool and vanpool projects Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 23 CFR part 657—Certification of size and weight enforcement Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 23 CFR part 658—Truck size and weight, route designations—length, width and weight limitations Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 23 CFR part 660—Special programs (Direct Federal) Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 23 CFR part 661—Indian Reservation Road Bridge Program Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 23 CFR part 668—Emergency Relief program Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 23 CFR part 669—Enforcement of heavy vehicle use tax Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. Year 7 (fall 2014) List of Rules That Will be Analyzed During the Next Year 23 CFR part 710—Right-of-way and real estate
                        ( print page 76758) 23 CFR part 750—Highway beautification 23 CFR part 751—Junkyard control and acquisition 23 CFR part 752—Landscape and roadside development 23 CFR part 771—Environmental impact and related procedures 23 CFR part 772—Procedures for abatement of highway traffic noise and construction noise 23 CFR part 773—Surface Transportation Project Delivery Pilot Program 23 CFR part 774—Parks, recreation areas, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, and historic sites (Section 4(f)) 23 CFR part 777—Mitigation of impacts to wetlands and natural habitat 23 CFR part 810—Mass transit and special use highway projects 23 CFR part 924—Highway safety improvement program Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Section 610 and Other Reviews Year
Regulations to be reviewed
Analysis year
Review year1
49 CFR part 372, subpart A
2008
20092
49 CFR part 386
2009
20103
49 CFR parts 325 and 390 (General)
2010
20114
49 CFR parts 390 (Small Passenger-Carrying Vehicles), 391 to 393 and 396 to 399
2011
20125
49 CFR part 387
2012
20136
49 CFR parts 356, 367, 369 to 371, 372 (subparts B and C)
2013
20147
49 CFR parts 373, 374, 376, and 379
2014
20158
49 CFR parts 360, 365, 366, and 368
2015
20169
49 CFR part 395
2016
201710
49 CFR parts 375, 377, 378
2017
2018
 Year 3 (Fall 2010) List of Rules With Ongoing Analysis 49 CFR part 325—Compliance With Interstate Motor Carrier Noise Emission 49 CFR part 390—Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, General Year 4 (Fall 2011) List of Rules Analyzed and a Summary of Results 49 CFR part 399—Employee Safety and Health Standards Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of these parts and found no SEIOSNOSE. While these parts affect a substantial number of small entities, the current requirements are prudent business practices and do*not*
                         impose a significant economic impact. General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FMCSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. Year 4 (Fall 2011) List of Rules With Ongoing Analysis 49 CFR part 390—Definition of Commercial Motor Vehicle (CMV)—Requirements for Operators of Small Passenger-Carrying CMVs. *This rule was moved up from Year 4 as a result of the Department's Retrospective Regulatory Review.* 49 CFR part 391—Driver Qualifications 49 CFR part 392—Driving of Commercial Motor Vehicles 49 CFR part 393—Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation 49 CFR part 396—Inspection, Repair and Maintenance of Commercial Motor Vehicles 49 CFR part 397—Transportation of Hazardous Materials; Driving and Parking Rules 49 CFR part 398—Transportation of Migrant Workers Year 5 (Fall 2012) List of Rules Analyzed and a Summary of Results 49 CFR part 387—Minimum Levels of Financial Responsibility for Motor Carriers Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found no SEIOSNOSE. While part 387 affects a substantial number of small entities, the currently required minimum levels of financial responsibility do*not*
                         impose a significant economic impact because the industry standard imposed by lenders requires an even higher level of coverage. General: On July 6, 2012, the President signed Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) into law. Section 32104 of MAP-21 directed the Secretary to issue a report on the appropriateness of: (1) the current minimum financial responsibility requirements for the transportation of passengers and property; and (2) the current bond and insurance requirements for freight forwarders and brokers, including for brokers for motor carriers of passengers. FMCSA issued this report in April 2014. Section 32104 also directed the Secretary to determine the appropriateness of these requirements every 4 years and to issue similar reports to Congress. In its April 2014 report, FMCSA concluded that the current financial responsibility minimums are inadequate to cover the costs of some crashes. FMCSA is drafting an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking an to considering increasing the current levels of minimum financial responsibility. Year 6 (Fall 2013) List of Rule(s) With Ongoing Analysis 49 CFR part 356—Motor Carrier Routing Regulations 49 CFR part 367—Standards for Registration With States 49 CFR part 369—Reports of Motor Carriers 49 CFR part 370—Principles and Practices for the Investigation and Voluntary Disposition of Loss and Damage Claims and Processing Salvage 49 CFR part 371—Brokers of Property 49 CFR part 372 (subparts B and C)—Exemptions, Commercial Zones and Terminal Areas Year 7 (Fall 2014) List of Rule(s) That Will Be Analyzed This Year 49 CFR part 373—Receipts and Bills 49 CFR part 374—Discrimination in Operations of Interstate Motor Common Carriers of Passengers 49 CFR part 376—Lease and Interchange of Vehicles 49 CFR part 379—Preservation of Records National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Section 610 and Other Reviews
                        ( print page 76759) Year
Regulations to be reviewed
Analysis year
Review year1
49 CFR parts 571.223 through 571.500, and parts 575 and 579
2008
20092
23 CFR parts 1200 through 1300
2009
20103
49 CFR parts 501 through 526 and 571.213
2010
20114
49 CFR parts 571.131, 571.217, 571.220, 571.221, and 571.222
2011
20125
49 CFR parts 571.101 through 571.110, and 571.135, 571.138, and 571.139
2012
20136
49 CFR parts 529 through 578, except parts 571 and 575
2013
20147
49 CFR parts 571.111 through 571.129 and parts 580 through 588
2014
20158
49 CFR parts 571.201 through 571.212
2015
20169
49 CFR parts 571.214 through 571.219, except 571.217
2016
201710
49 CFR parts 591 through 595 and new parts and subparts
2017
2018
 Year 6 (fall 2013) List of Rules Analyzed and a Summary of the Results 49 CFR part 529—Manufacturers of Multistage Automobiles Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 531—Passenger Automobile Average Fuel Economy Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 533—Light Truck Fuel Economy Standards Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 534—Rights and Responsibilities of Manufacturers in the Context of Changes in Corporate Relationships Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 535—Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Program Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 536—Transfer and Trading of Fuel Economy Credits Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 537—Automotive Fuel Economy Reports Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 538—Manufacturing Incentives for Alternative Fuel Vehicles Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 541—Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 542—Procedures for Selecting Light Duty Truck Lines to be Covered by the Theft Prevention Standard Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 543—Exemption From Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 545—Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard Phase-In and Small-Volume Line Reporting Requirements Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 551—Procedural Rules Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 552—Petitions for Rulemaking, Defect, and Noncompliance Orders Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 553—Rulemaking Procedures Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 554—Standards Enforcement and Defects Investigation Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.( print page 76760) General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 555—Temporary Exemption from Motor Vehicle Safety and Bumper Standards Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 556—Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 557—Petitions for Hearings on Notification and Remedy of Defects Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 563—Event Data Recorders Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 564—Replaceable Light Source and Sealed Beam Headlamp Information Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 565—Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) Requirements Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 566—Manufacturer Identification Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 567—Certification Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 568—Vehicles Manufactured in Two or More Stages—All Incomplete, Intermediate and Final-Stage Manufacturers of Vehicles Manufactured in Two or More Stages Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 569—Regrooved Tires Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 570—Vehicle In Use Inspection Standards Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 572—Anthropomorphic Test Devices Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 573—Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 574—Tire Identification and Recordkeeping Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 576—Record Retention Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 577—Defect and Noncompliance Notification Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 578—Civil and Criminal Penalties Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. Year 7 (Fall 2014) List of Rules That Will Be Analyzed During the Next Year 49 CFR part 571.111—Rear Visibility 49 CFR part 571.112—[Reserved] 49 CFR part 571.113—Hood Latch System 49 CFR part 571.114—Theft Protection and Rollaway Prevention 49 CFR part 571.115—[Reserved] 49 CFR part 571.116—Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids 49 CFR part 571.117—Retreaded Pneumatic Tires 49 CFR part 571.118—Power-Operated Window, Partition, and Roof Panel Systems 49 CFR part 571.119—New Pneumatic Tires For Motor Vehicles With a GVWR of More Than 4,536 Kilograms (10,000 Pounds) and Motorcycles 49 CFR part 571.120—Tire Selection and Rims and Motor Home/Recreation Vehicle Trailer Load 
                        ( print page 76761)
                        Carrying Capacity Information For Motor Vehicles With a GVWR of More Than 4,536 Kilograms (10,000 Pounds) 49 CFR part 571.121—Air Brake Systems 49 CFR part 571.122—Motorcycle Brake Systems 49 CFR part 571.122a—Motorcycle Brake Systems 49 CFR part 571.123—Motorcycle Controls and Displays 49 CFR part 571.124—Accelerator Control Systems 49 CFR part 571.125—Warning Devices 49 CFR part 571.126—Electronic Stability Control Systems 49 CFR part 571.127-571.128—[Reserved] 49 CFR part 571.129—New Non-pneumatic Tires For Passenger Cars 49 CFR part 580—Odometer Disclosure Requirements 49 CFR part 581—Bumper Standard 49 CFR part 582—Insurance Cost Information Regulation 49 CFR part 583—Automobile Parts Content Labeling 49 CFR part 585—Phase-In Reporting Requirements 49 CFR part 586—[Reserved] 49 CFR part 587—Deformable Barriers 49 CFR part 588—Child Restraint Systems Recordkeeping Requirements Federal Railroad Administration Section 610 and Other Reviews Year
Regulations to be reviewed
Analysis year
Review year1
49 CFR parts 200 and 201
2008
20092
49 CFR parts 207, 209, 211, 215, 238, and 256
2009
20103
49 CFR parts 210, 212, 214, 217, and 268
2010
20114
49 CFR part 219
2011
20125
49 CFR parts 218, 221, 241, and 244
2012
20136
49 CFR parts 216, 228, and 229
2013
20147
49 CFR parts 223 and 233
2014
20158
49 CFR parts 224, 225, 231, and 234
2015
20169
49 CFR parts 222, 227, 235, 236, 250, 260, and 266
2016
201710
49 CFR parts 213, 220, 230, 232, 239, 240, and 265
2017
2018
 Year 6 (Fall 2013) List of Rules Analyzed and a Summary of Results 49 CFR part 216—Special Notice and Emergency Order Procedures: Railroad Track, Locomotive and Equipment Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: Since the rule deals with the special notices for repairs of railroad freight car, locomotive, passenger equipment, and track class, and prescribes for the issuance and review of emergency orders for removing dangerously substandard track from service, it will provide safety and security for railroad employees and the public. FRA's plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 228—Hours of Service of Railroad Employees Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: Since the rule prescribes reporting and recordkeeping requirements regarding the hours of service of certain railroad employees, railroad contractors and subcontractors; establishes requirements for electronic recordkeeping systems for the creation and maintenance of required hours of service records; establishes standards and procedures concerning the construction or reconstruction of sleeping quarters; establishes minimum safety and health standards for camp cars provided by a railroad as sleeping quarters; and prescribes substantive hours of service requirements for train employees engaged in commuter or intercity rail passenger transportation, it promotes the safety of railroad operations and employees. FRA's plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 229—Railroad Locomotive Safety Standards Section 610: There is a SEIOSNOSE. These are minimum Federal standards for railroad locomotive safety. The FRA will conduct a formal review to identify whether opportunities may exist to reduce the burden on small railroads without compromising safety standards.
                    General: Since the rule prescribes minimum Federal safety standards for all locomotives except those propelled by steam power, these regulations are necessary to achieve better and effective compliance of railroad locomotive safety standards and to minimize the number of casualties. FRA's plain language review of this rule indicates that there is no need for substantial revision. Year 7 (Fall 2014) List of Rule(s) That Will Be Analyzed During Next Year 49 CFR part 223—Safety Glazing Standards—Locomotives, Passenger Cars and Cabooses 49 CFR part 233—Signal System Reporting Requirements Federal Transit Administration Section 610 and Other Reviews Year
Regulations to be reviewed
Analysis year
Review year1
49 CFR parts 604, 605, and 633
2008
20092
49 CFR parts 661 and 665
2009
20103
49 CFR part 633
2010
20114
49 CFR parts 609 and 611
2011
20125
49 CFR parts 613 and 614
2012
20136
49 CFR part 622
2013
20147
49 CFR part 630
2014
20158
49 CFR part 639
2015
20169
49 CFR parts 659 and 663
2016
2017( print page 76762)10
49 CFR part 665
2017
2018
 Year 6 (Fall 2013): List of Rules Analyzed and Summary of Results 49 CFR part 622—Environmental Impact and Related Procedures Section 610: The agency has determined that the rule does not have a significant effect on a substantial number of small entities. FTA and FHWA recently revised the rule and evaluated the likely effects of the final rule on small entities and requested public comment during the rulemaking process. FTA and FHWA determined that the rule does not have a significant economic impact on entities of any size. FTA and FHWA expect the revisions to the rule will expedite environmental review. Thus, FTA and FHWA determined that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. FTA and FHWA received no comment on this issue in the rulemaking process.
                    General: FTA revised part 622 via a final rule in January 2013, in order to implement recent MAP-21 requirements (see79 FR 2107). Part 622 cross-references 23 CFR part 771. FTA and FHWA joint procedures at 23 CFR part 771 describe how FTA and FHWA comply with NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA. Sections 1316 and 1317 of MAP-21 require the Secretary of Transportation to promulgate regulations designating two types of actions as categorical exclusions in 23 CFR part 771: (1) Any project (as defined in 23 U.S.C. 101(a)) within an existing operational right-of-way; and (2) any project that receives less than $5,000,000 of Federal funds or with a total estimated cost of not more than $30,000,000 and Federal funds comprising less than 15 percent of the total estimated project cost, respectively. Year 7 (Fall 2014) List of Rules That Will Be Analyzed During the Next Year 49 CFR part 630—National Transit Database Maritime Administration Section 610 and Other Reviews Year
Regulations to be reviewed
Analysis year
Review year1
46 CFR parts 201 through 205
2008
20092
46 CFR parts 221 through 232
2009
20103
46 CFR parts 249 through 296
2010
20114
46 CFR parts 221, 298, 308, and 309
2011
20125
46 CFR parts 307 through 309
2012
20136
46 CFR part 310
2013
20147
46 CFR parts 315 through 340
2014
20158
46 CFR parts 345 through 381
2015
20169
46 CFR parts 382 through 389
2016
201710
46 CFR parts 390 through 393
2017
2018
 Year 4 (fall 2011) List of Rules Analyzed and Summary of Results 46 CFR part 221—Foreign Transfer Regulations Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: An updated rule was promulgated, providing technical changes including corrections to statutory references, updates to citations and addresses, and deleted other obsolete references. 46 CFR part 327—Administrative Claims Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: An updated rule was promulgated, providing clarity to the public regarding the filing of administrative claims and adopting a procedural process for effectively resolving claims under the Suits in Admiralty Act, the Admiralty Extension Act and the Clarification Act. 46 CFR part 249—Approval of Underwriters for Marine Hull Insurance Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. MARAD's plain language review of this rule indicated no need for substantial revision. 46 CFR part 287—Establishment of Construction Reserve Funds Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. MARAD's plain language review of this rule indicated no need for substantial revision. 46 CFR part 295—Maritime Security Program (MSP) Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. MARAD's plain language review of this rule indicated no need for substantial revision. Year 4 (fall 2011) List of Rules With Ongoing Analysis 46 CFR part 381—Cargo Preference—U.S.-Flag Vessels 46 CFR part 383—Cargo Preference—Compromise, Assessment, Mitigation, Settlement, and Collection of Civil Penalties 46 CFR part 272—Requirements and Procedures for Conducting Condition Surveys and Administering Maintenance and Repair Subsidy 46 CFR part 296—Maritime Security Program (MSP) Year 5 (2012) List of Rules Analyzed and Summary of Results 46 CFR part 308—War Risk Insurance Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: An updated rule was promulgated, correcting numerous citations, updating relevant agency contact and underwriting agent information, and removing other obsolete references. 46 CFR part 309—War Risk Ship Valuation Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
                    General: No changes are needed. MARAD's plain language review of this rule indicated no need for substantial revision.( print page 76763)
                    Year 5 (2012) List of Rules With Ongoing Analysis
                    46 CFR part 307—Mandatory Position Report System for Vessels
                    Year 6 (2013) List of Rules With Ongoing Analysis
                    46 CFR part 310—Merchant Marine Training
                    Year 7 (2014) List of Rules That Will be Analyzed During the Next Year
                    46 CFR part 315—Agency Agreements and Appointment of Agents
                    46 CFR part 317—Bonding of Ship's Personnel
                    46 CFR part 324—Procedural Rules for Financial Transactions Under Agency Agreements
                    46 CFR part 325—Procedure to be Followed by General Agents in Preparation of Invoices and Payment of Compensation Pursuant to Provisions of NSA Order No. 47
                    46 CFR part 326—Marine Protection and Indemnity Insurance Under Agreements with Agents
                    46 CFR part 327—Seamen's Claims; Administrative Action and Litigation
                    46 CFR part 328—Slop Chests
                    46 CFR part 329—Voyage Data
                    46 CFR part 330—Launch Services
                    46 CFR part 332—Repatriation of Seaman
                    46 CFR part 335—Authority and Responsibility of General Agents to Undertake Emergency Repairs in Foreign Ports
                    46 CFR part 336—Authority and Responsibility of General Agents to Undertake in Continental United States Ports Voyage Repairs and Service Equipment of Vessels Operated for the Account of the National Shipping Authority Under General Agency Agreement
                    46 CFR part 337—General Agent's responsibility in Connection with Foreign Repair Custom's Entries
                    46 CFR part 338—Procedure for Accomplishment of Vessel Repairs Under National Shipping Authority Master Lump Sum Repair Contract—NSA—Lumpsumrep
                    46 CFR part 339—Procedure for Accomplishment of Ship Repairs Under National Shipping Authority Individual Contract for Minor Repairs—NSA—Worksmalrep
                    46 CFR part 340—Priority Use and Allocation of Shipping Services, Container and Chassis and Port Facilities and Services for National Security and National Defense Related Operations.
                    Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)
                    Section 610 and Other Reviews
                    Year
Regulations to be reviewed
Analysis year
Review year1
49 CFR part 178
2008
20092
49 CFR parts 178 through 180
2009
20103
49 CFR parts 172 and 175
2010
20114
49 CFR part 171, sections 171.15 and 171.16
2011
20125
49 CFR parts 106, 107, 171, 190, and 195
2012
20136
49 CFR parts 174, 177, 191, and 192
2013
20147
49 CFR parts 176 and 199
2014
20158
49 CFR parts 172 through 178
2015
20169
49 CFR parts 172, 173, 174, 176, 177, and 193
2016
201710
49 CFR parts 173 and 194
2017
2018
                    Year 6 (fall 2013) List of Rules Analyzed and a Summary of Results
                    49 CFR part 174—Carriage by Rail
                    
            Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. On August 27-28, 2013 (78 FR 42998) PHMSA and FRA held a public meeting to address the transportation of hazardous materials by rail. This meeting was part of PHMSA and FRA's comprehensive review of operational factors that affect the safety of the transportation of hazardous materials by rail and sought input from stakeholders and interested parties. Specifically, this meeting sought comment from the regulated community including small entities on revision to part 174. PHMSA and FRA have evaluated the comments from this meeting. The comments to this public meeting noted that some small entities may be affected, but the economic impact on small entities will not be significant. As a result, the agency determined that the rules do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. A response to the public comments, including those of small entities, and proposals for corresponding revisions to part 174 will be included in a future rulemaking.
                    General: The requirements in this rule are necessary to protect rail transportation workers and the general public from the dangers associated with hazardous materials incidents in rail transportation. PHMSA's plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision however any revisions to part 174 as part of a future rulemaking will take into account plain language principles and where appropriate clarify unclear language.49 CFR part 177—Carriage by Public Highway
                    
            Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. This rule prescribes minimum safety standards for the transportation of hazardous materials for highway transportation. Some small entities may be affected, but the economic impact on small entities will not be significant.General: The requirements in this rule are necessary to protect highway transportation workers and the general public from the dangers associated with hazardous materials incidents in highway transportation. PHMSA's plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.
                    49 CFR part 191—Transportation of Natural and Other Gas by Pipeline; Annual Reports, Incident Reports, and Safety-Related Condition Reports
                    
            Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. Based on regulated entities, PHMSA found that the majority of operators are not small businesses. Therefore, though some small entities may be affected, the economic impact on small entities will not be significant.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. PHMSA's plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.49 CFR part 192—Transportation of Natural and Other Gas by Pipeline: Minimum Federal Safety Standards
                        ( print page 76764)
                    
            Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. Based on regulated entities, PHMSA found that the majority of operators are not small businesses. Therefore, though some small entities may be affected, the economic impact on small entities will not be significant.
                    General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. PHMSA's plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.Year 7 (fall 2014) List of Rules That Will Be Analyzed During the Next Year
                    49 CFR part 176—Carriage by Vessel
                    49 CFR part 199—Drug and Alcohol Testing
                    Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation
                    Section 610 and Other Reviews
                    Year
Regulations to be reviewed
Analysis year
Review year1
33 CFR parts 401 through 403
2008
2009
                    Year 1 (fall 2008) List of rules With Ongoing Analysis
                    33 CFR part 401—Seaway Regulations and Rules
                    33 CFR part 402—Tariff of Tolls
                    33 CFR part 403—Rules of Procedure of the Joint Tolls Review Board
                    Office of the Secretary—Proposed Rule Stage
Sequence No.
Title
Regulation 
                                 Identifier No.365
+Airline Pricing Transparency and Other Consumer Protection Issues
2105-AE11+ DOT-designated significant regulation
                    Federal Aviation Administration—Proposed Rule Stage
Sequence No.
Title
Regulation 
                                 Identifier No.366
+Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) (
                                **Reg Plan Seq No. 104**
                                )
2120-AJ60367
+Pilot Professional Development (HR 5900) Rebaselined
2120-AJ87368
Flight Simulation Training Device (FSTD) Qualification Standards for Extended Envelope and Adverse Weather Event Training
2120-AK08369
+Drug and Alcohol Testing of Certain Maintenance Provider Employees Located Outside of the United States (
                                **Reg Plan Seq No. 106**
                                )
2120-AK09+ DOT-designated significant regulationReferences in boldface appear in The Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the 
                            **Federal Register**
                            .
                    Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration—Proposed Rule Stage
Sequence No.
Title
Regulation 
                                 Identifier No.370
+Carrier Safety Fitness Determination (
                                **Reg Plan Seq No. 111**
                                )
2126-AB11371
+Electronic Logging Devices and Hours of Service Supporting Documents (MAP-21) (
                                **Reg Plan Seq No. 112**
                                )
2126-AB20+ DOT-designated significant regulationReferences in boldface appear in The Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the 
                            **Federal Register**
                            .
                    Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration—Final Rule Stage
Sequence No.
Title
Regulation 
                                 Identifier No.372
+Commercial Driver's License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse (MAP-21) (
                                **Reg Plan Seq No. 113**
                                )
2126-AB18373
+Lease and Interchange of Vehicles; Motor Carriers of Passengers
2126-AB44374
+Inspection, Repair, and Maintenance; Driver-Vehicle Inspection Report (RRR)
2126-AB46+ DOT-designated significant regulationReferences in boldface appear in The Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the 
                            **Federal Register**
                            .
                    ( print page 76765)
                    Federal Railroad Administration—Proposed Rule Stage
Sequence No.
Title
Regulation 
                                 Identifier No.375
+Train Crew Staffing
2130-AC48+ DOT-designated significant regulation
                    Federal Railroad Administration—Completed Actions
Sequence No.
Title
Regulation 
                                 Identifier No.376
+Training Standards for Railroad Employees
2130-AC06+ DOT-designated significant regulation
                    Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration—Proposed Rule Stage
Sequence No.
Title
Regulation 
                                 Identifier No.377
+Pipeline Safety: Safety of On-Shore Liquid Hazardous Pipelines (
                                **Reg Plan Seq No. 118**
                                )
2137-AE66378
Pipeline Safety: Issues Related to the Use of Plastic Pipe in Gas Pipeline Industry
2137-AE93379
+Pipeline Safety: Operator Qualification, Cost Recovery, Accident and Incident Notification, and Other Changes (RRR)
2137-AE94380
+Pipeline Safety: Amendments to Parts 192 and 195 to Require Valve Installation and Minimum Rupture Detection Standards
2137-AF06+ DOT-designated significant regulationReferences in boldface appear in The Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the 
                            **Federal Register**
                            .
                    Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration—Completed Actions
Sequence No.
Title
Regulation 
                                 Identifier No.381
+Hazardous Materials: Transportation of Lithium Batteries
2137-AE44+ DOT-designated significant regulation
                    Maritime Administration—Proposed Rule Stage
Sequence No.
Title
Regulation 
                                 Identifier No.382
+Cargo Preference
2133-AB74+ DOT-designated significant regulation
                    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
                    Office of the Secretary (OST)
                    Proposed Rule Stage
                    365. +Airline Pricing Transparency and Other Consumer Protection Issues
                    *Legal Authority:*49 U.S.C. 41712; 49 U.S.C. 40101; 49 U.S.C. 41702
                    *Abstract:*
                         This rulemaking action would enhance protections for air travelers and to improve the air travel environment, including clarification and codification of the Department's interpretation of the statutory definition of ticket agent.” This action would also require airlines and ticket agents to disclose at all points of sale the fees for certain basic ancillary services associated with the air transportation consumers are buying or considering buying. This action would also enhance additional airline passenger protections, such as: Expanding the pool of reporting” carriers; requiring enhanced reporting by mainline carriers for their domestic code-share partner operations; requiring large travel agents to adopt minimum customer service standards; codifying the statutory requirements that carriers and ticket agents disclose any code-share arrangements on their Web sites; and prohibiting unfair and deceptive practices such as undisclosed biasing and post-purchase price increases. This action would require ticket agents to disclose the carriers whose tickets they sell in order to avoid having consumers mistakenly believe they are searching all possible flight options for a particular city-pair market when in fact there may be other options available. Additionally, this action would correct drafting errors and make minor changes to the Department's second Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections rule to conform to guidance issued by the Department's Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings (Enforcement Office) regarding its interpretation of the rule.
                    *Timetable:*
                    Action
Date
FR CiteNPRM
05/23/14
79 FR 29970NPRM Comment Period Extended
08/06/14
79 FR 45731NPRM Comment Period End
08/21/14NPRM: Extended Comment Period End
09/22/14Analyzing Comments
12/00/14
                    ( print page 76766)
                    *Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:*
                         Yes.
                    *Agency Contact:*
                         Blane A Workie, Principal Deputy Assistant General Counsel, Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
                        *Phone:*
                         202 366-9342. 
                        *TDD Phone:*
                         202 755-7687, 
                        *Fax:*
                         202 366-7152, 
                        *Email: blane.workie@dot.gov*.
                    *RIN:*
                         2105-AE11
                    
                    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
                    Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
                    Proposed Rule Stage
                    366. +Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (SUAS)
                    *Regulatory Plan:*
                         This entry is Seq. No. 104 in part II of this issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        .
                    *RIN:*
                         2120-AJ60
                    367. +Pilot Professional Development (HR 5900) Rebaselined
                    *Legal Authority:*49 U.S.C. 44701(a)(5); Pub. L. 111-216, sec 206
                    *Abstract:*
                         This rulemaking would amend the regulations for air carrier training programs under part 121. The action is necessary to ensure that air carriers establish or modify training programs that address mentoring, leadership, and professional development of flight crewmembers in part 121 operations. The amendments are intended to respond to the mandate in Public Law 111-216.
                    *Timetable:*
                    Action
Date
FR CiteNPRM
04/00/15
                    *Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:*
                         Yes.
                    *Agency Contact:*
                         Deke Abbott, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, 
                        *Phone*: 202 267-8266, 
                        *Email: deke.abbott@faa.gov*.
                    *RIN:*
                         2120-AJ87
                    368. Flight Simulation Training Device (FSTD) Qualification Standards for Extended Envelope and Adverse Weather Event Training
                    *Legal Authority:*49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C. 44701; Pub. L. 111-216
                    *Abstract:*
                         This rulemaking would amend evaluation qualifications for simulators to ensure the simulators are technically capable of performing new flight training tasks as identified in the Airline Safety and Federal Aviation Administration Extension Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-216) and that are included in a separate rulemaking (2120-AJ00). By ensuring the simulators provide an accurate and realistic simulation, this rulemaking would allow for training on the following tasks: (1) Full/aerodynamic stall, and (2) upset recognition and recovery, as identified in Public Law 111-216. Furthermore, this rulemaking would improve the minimum FSTD evaluation requirements for gusting crosswinds (takeoff/landing), engine and airframe icing, and bounced landing recovery methods in response to NTSB and Aviation Rulemaking Committee recommendations. The intended effect is to ensure an adequate level of simulator fidelity.
                    *Timetable:*
                    Action
Date
FR CiteNPRM
07/10/14
79 FR 39461NPRM Comment Period Extended
09/16/14
79 FR 55407NPRM Comment Period End
10/08/14NPRM Comment Period Extended End
01/06/15
                    *Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:*
                         Yes.
                    *Agency Contact:*
                         Larry McDonald, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, PO Box 20636, Atlanta, GA 30320, 
                        *Phone*: 404-474-5620, 
                        *Email: larry.e.mcdonald@faa.gov*.
                    *RIN:*
                         2120-AK08
                    369. +Drug and Alcohol Testing of Certain Maintenance Provider Employees Located Outside of the United States
                    *Regulatory Plan:*
                         This entry is Seq. No. 106 in part II of this issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        .
                    *RIN:*
                         2120-AK09
                    
                    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
                    Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)
                    Proposed Rule Stage
                    370. +Carrier Safety Fitness Determination
                    *Regulatory Plan:*
                         This entry is Seq. No. 111 in part II of this issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        .
                    *RIN:*
                         2126-AB11
                    371. +Electronic Logging Devices and Hours of Service Supporting Documents (MAP-21)
                    *Regulatory Plan:*
                         This entry is Seq. No. 112 in part II of this issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        .
                    *RIN:*
                         2126-AB20
                    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
                    Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)
                    Final Rule Stage
                    372. +Commercial Driver's License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse (MAP-21)
                    *Regulatory Plan:*
                         This entry is Seq. No. 113 in part II of this issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        .
                    *RIN:*
                         2126-AB18
                    373. +Lease and Interchange of Vehicles; Motor Carriers of Passengers
                    *Legal Authority:*49 U.S.C. 31502; 49 U.S.C. 13301; 49 U.S.C. 31136
                    *Abstract:*
                         FMCSA proposes to adopt regulations governing the lease and interchange of passenger-carrying commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) to: (1) Identify the motor carrier operating a passenger-carrying CMV and responsible for compliance with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) and all other applicable Federal regulations; (2) ensure that a lessor surrenders control of the CMV for the full term of the lease or temporary exchange of CMVs and drivers; and (3) require motor carriers subject to a prohibition on operating in interstate commerce to notify the FMCSA in writing before leasing or otherwise transferring control of their vehicles to other carriers. This action is necessary to ensure that unsafe passenger carriers cannot evade FMCSA oversight and enforcement by operating under the authority of another carrier that exercises no actual control over those operations. This action will enable the FMCSA, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), and our Federal and State partners to identify motor carriers transporting passengers in interstate commerce, and correctly assign responsibility to these entities for regulatory violations during inspections, compliance investigations, and crash studies. It also provides the general public with the means to identify the responsible motor carrier at the time of transportation. While detailed lease and interchange regulations for cargo-
                        ( print page 76767)
                        carrying vehicles have been in effect since 1950, these proposed rules for passenger-carrying CMVs are focused entirely on operational safety.
                    *Timetable:*
                    Action
Date
FR CiteNPRM
09/20/13
78 FR 57822NPRM Comment Period End
11/19/13Final Rule
08/00/15
                    *Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:*
                         Yes.
                    *Agency Contact:*
                         David Miller, Regulatory Development Division, Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
                        *Phone*: 202 366-5370, 
                        *Email: fmcsaregs@dot.gov*.
                    *RIN:*
                         2126-AB44
                    374. +Inspection, Repair, and Maintenance; Driver-Vehicle Inspection Report (RRR)
                    *Legal Authority:*49 U.S.C. 31502(b)
                    *Abstract:*
                         This rulemaking would rescind the requirement that commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers operating in interstate commerce submit, and motor carriers retain, driver-vehicle inspection reports when the driver has neither found nor been made aware of any vehicle defects or deficiencies. Specifically, this rulemaking would remove a significant information collection burden without adversely impacting safety. This rulemaking responds in part to the President's January 2012 Regulatory Review and Reform initiative.
                    *Timetable:*
                    Action
Date
FR CiteNPRM
08/07/13
78 FR 48125Comment Period End
10/07/13Final Rule
11/00/14
                    *Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:*
                         Yes.
                    *Agency Contact:*
                         Sean Gallagher, MC-PRR, Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
                        *Phone:*
                         202 366-3740, 
                        *Email: sean.gallagher@dot.gov*.
                    *RIN:*
                         2126-AB46
                    
                    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
                    Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
                    Proposed Rule Stage
                    375. • +Train Crew Staffing
                    *Legal Authority:*49 U.S.C. 20103; 49 U.S.C. 20107; 49 U.S.C. 21301 to 21302; 49 U.S.C. 21304; 28 U.S.C. 2461, note; 49 CFR 1.89
                    *Abstract:*
                         This rulemaking would add minimum requirements for the size of different train crew staffs depending on the type of operation. The minimum crew staffing requirements would reflect for the safety risks posed to railroad employees, the general public, and the environment and would account for differences in costs. This rulemaking would also establish minimum requirements for the roles and responsibilities of the second train crew member on a moving train, and promote safe and effective teamwork. Additionally, this rulemaking would permit a railroad to submit information to FRA and seek approval if it wants to continue an existing operation with a one-person train crew or start up an operation with less than two crew members.
                    *Timetable:*
                    Action
Date
FR CiteNPRM
01/00/15
                    *Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:*
                         Yes.
                    *Agency Contact:*
                         Kathryn Shelton, Trial Attorney, Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20590, 
                        *Phone*: 202 493-6063, 
                        *Fax*: 202 493-6068.
                    *RIN:*
                         2130-AC48
                    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
                    Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
                    Completed Actions
                    376. +Training Standards for Railroad Employees
                    *Legal Authority:*Pub. L. 110-432, Div A, 122 Stat 4848 
                        *et seq.;*
                         Railroad Safety Improvement Act of 2008; sec 401 (49 U.S.C. 20162)
                    *Abstract:*
                         This rulemaking would: (1) Establish minimum training standards for each class or craft of safety-related employee and equivalent railroad contractor and subcontractor employee by requiring railroads, contractors, and subcontractors to qualify and document the proficiency of such employees on their knowledge and ability to comply with Federal railroad safety laws and regulations, and railroad rules, and procedures intended to implement those laws and regulations, etc.; (2) require submission of the training and qualification programs for FRA approval; and (3) establish a minimum training curriculum, and ongoing training criteria, testing, and skills evaluation measures.
                    *Timetable:*
                    Action
Date
FR CiteNPRM
02/07/12
77 FR 6412NPRM Comment Period End
04/09/12Final Rule
11/07/14
79 FR 66460Final Rule Effective
01/06/15
                    *Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:*
                         Yes.
                    *Agency Contact:*
                         Kathryn Shelton, Trial Attorney, Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
                        *Phone*: 202 493-6063, 
                        *Email: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov*.
                    *RIN:*
                         2130-AC06
                    
                    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
                    Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)
                    Proposed Rule Stage
                    377. +Pipeline Safety: Safety of On-Shore Liquid Hazardous Pipelines
                    *Regulatory Plan:*
                         This entry is Seq. No. 118 in part II of this issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        .
                    *RIN:*
                         2137-AE66
                    378. Pipeline Safety: Issues Related to the Use of Plastic Pipe in Gas Pipeline Industry
                    *Legal Authority:*49 U.S.C. 60101 
                        *et seq.*
                    *Abstract:*
                         This rulemaking would address a number of topics related to the use of plastic pipe in the gas pipeline industry. These topics include certain newer types of plastic pipe PE (polyethylene), PA11 (polyamide 11), PA12 (polyamide 12), 50-year markings, design factors, risers, incorporation by reference of certain plastic pipe related standards, and tracking and traceability.
                    *Timetable:*
                    Action
Date
FR CiteNPRM
04/00/15
                    ( print page 76768)
                    *Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:*
                         Yes.
                    *Agency Contact:*
                         Cameron H Satterthwaite, Transportation Regulations Specialist, Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
                        *Phone*: 202 366-8553, 
                        *Email: cameron.satterthwaite@dot.gov*.
                    *RIN:*
                         2137-AE93
                    379. +Pipeline Safety: Operator Qualification, Cost Recovery, Accident and Incident Notification, and Other Changes (RRR)
                    *Legal Authority:*49 U.S.C. 60101 
                        *et seq.*
                    *Abstract:*
                         This rulemaking would address miscellaneous issues that have been raised because of the reauthorization of the pipeline safety program in 2012, and petitions for rulemaking from many affected stakeholders. Some of the issues that this rulemaking would address include: renewal process for special permits, cost recovery for design reviews, and incident reporting.
                    *Timetable:*
                    Action
Date
FR CiteNPRM
04/00/15
                    *Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:*
                         Yes.
                    *Agency Contact:*
                         John A Gale, Transportation Regulations Specialist, Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
                        *Phone*: 202-366-0434, 
                        *Email*: 
                        *john.gale@dot.gov*.
                    *RIN:*
                         2137-AE94
                    380. +Pipeline Safety: Amendments to Parts 192 and 195 To Require Valve Installation and Minimum Rupture Detection Standards
                    *Legal Authority:*49 U.S.C. 60101 
                        *et seq.*
                    *Abstract:*
                         This rulemaking action would propose mandatory installation of automatic shutoff valves, remote controlled valves, or equivalent technology, and establish performance-based meaningful metrics for rupture detection for gas and liquid transmission pipelines. The overall intent is that rupture detection metrics will be integrated with ASV and RCV placement, with the objective of improving overall incident response. Rupture response metrics would focus on mitigating large, unsafe, uncontrolled release events that have a greater potential consequence. The areas proposed to be covered include high consequence areas (HCA) for hazardous liquids and HCA, Class 3 and 4 for natural gas (including could affect areas).
                    *Timetable:*
                    Action
Date
FR CiteNPRM
05/00/15
                    *Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:*
                         Yes.
                    *Agency Contact:*
                         Lawrence White, Attorney-Advisor, Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20590, 
                        *Phone*: 202 366-4400, 
                        *Fax*: 292 366-7041.
                    *RIN:*
                         2137-AF06
                    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
                    Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)
                    Completed Actions
                    381. +Hazardous Materials: Transportation of Lithium Batteries
                    *Legal Authority:*49 U.S.C. 5101 
                        *et seq.*
                    *Abstract:*
                         This rulemaking amended the Hazardous Materials Regulations to comprehensively address the safe transportation of lithium cells and batteries. The rulemaking strengthened the regulatory framework by imposing more effective safeguards, including design testing to address risks related to internal short circuits, and enhanced packaging, hazard communication, and operational measures for various types and sizes of lithium batteries in specific transportation contexts. The rulemaking responded to several recommendations issued by the National Transportation Safety Board.
                    *Timetable:*
                    Action
Date
FR CiteNPRM
01/11/10
75 FR 1302NPRM Comment Period End
03/12/10Notice
04/11/12
77 FR 21714Notice Comment Period End
05/11/12NPRM; Request for Additional Comments
01/07/13
78 FR 1119Additional Comments Period End
03/08/13Final Rule
08/06/14
79 FR 46011Final Rule Effective
08/06/14
                    *Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:*
                         Yes.
                    *Agency Contact:*
                         Kevin Leary, Transportation Specialist, Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
                        *Phone*: 202-366-8553, 
                        *Email: kevin.leary@dot.gov*.
                    *RIN:*
                         2137-AE44
                    
                    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
                    Maritime Administration (MARAD)
                    Proposed Rule Stage
                    382. +Cargo Preference
                    *Legal Authority:*49 CFR 1.66; 46 app U.S.C. 1101; 46 app U.S.C. 1241; 46 U.S.C. 2302 (e)(1); Pub. L. 91-469
                    *Abstract:*
                         This rulemaking would revise and clarify the cargo preference regulations that have not been revised substantially since 1971. The rulemaking would also implement statutory changes, including section 3511, Public Law 110 to 417, of The National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2009, which provides enforcement authority.
                    *Timetable:*
                    Action
Date
FR CiteNPRM
02/00/15
                    *Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:*
                         Yes
                    *Agency Contact:*
                         Christine Gurland, Department of Transportation, Maritime Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
                        *Phone:*
                         202 366-3000, 
                        *Email: christine.gurland@dot.gov*.
                    *RIN:*
                         2133-AB74


BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P BILLING CODE 4910-13-P BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P BILLING CODE 4910-06-P BILLING CODE 4910-60-P [FR Doc. 2014-29407 Filed 12-19-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-81-P