alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1580 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act with respect to the scheduling 

of fentanyl-related substances, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2023 

Mr. JOHNSON of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act with respect to 

the scheduling of fentanyl-related substances, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Continuous and En5 during Action to Stop Every Overdose Act of 2023’’ or 

6 the ‘‘CEASE Overdose Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1580 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLASS SCHEDULING OF FENTANYL-RELATED SUB2 STANCES. 

3 Section 202(c) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

4 U.S.C. 812(c)) is amended by adding at the end of sched5 ule I the following: 

6 ‘‘(e)(1) Unless specifically exempted or unless listed 

7 in another schedule, any material, compound, mixture, or 

8 preparation which contains any quantity of a fentanyl-re9 lated substance, or which contains the salts, isomers, and 

10 salts of isomers of a fentanyl-related substance whenever 

11 the existence of such salts, isomers, and salts of isomers 

12 is possible within the specific chemical designation. 

13 ‘‘(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), except as pro14 vided in paragraph (3), the term ‘fentanyl-related sub15 stance’ means any substance that is structurally related 

16 to fentanyl by 1 or more of the following modifications: 

17 ‘‘(A) By replacement of the phenyl portion of 

18 the phenethyl group by any monocycle, whether or 

19 not further substituted in or on the monocycle. 

20 ‘‘(B) By substitution in or on the phenethyl 

21 group with alkyl, alkenyl, alkoxyl, hydroxyl, halo, 

22 haloalkyl, amino, or nitro groups. 

23 ‘‘(C) By substitution in or on the piperidine 

24 ring with alkyl, alkenyl, alkoxyl, ester, ether, 

25 hydroxyl, halo, haloalkyl, amino, or nitro groups. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 1580 IH

1 ‘‘(D) By replacement of the aniline ring with 

2 any aromatic monocycle whether or not further sub3 stituted in or on the aromatic monocycle. 

4 ‘‘(E) By replacement of the N-propionyl group 

5 with another acyl group. 

6 ‘‘(3) A substance that satisfies the definition of the 

7 term ‘fentanyl-related substance’ in paragraph (2) shall 

8 nonetheless not be treated as a fentanyl-related substance 

9 subject to this schedule if the substance— 

10 ‘‘(A) is controlled by action of the Attorney 

11 General under section 201; or 

12 ‘‘(B) is otherwise expressly listed in a schedule 

13 other than this schedule.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LISA CONSALVO

, Appellant,

v.

PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS, INC.

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3926

[ November 15, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Michael L. Gates , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 15

- 016571(12)

.

Glen B. Levine of the Law Offices of Anidjar & Levine, P.A., Fort

Lauderdale, for appellant.

Edward G. Guedes and Richard Rosengarten of Weiss Serota Helfman

Cole & Bierman, P.L., Coral Gables, f or appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ERBER , C.J., W ARNER and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certification of Chief FinancialOfficer**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Thomas H. Ehrlich,certify that:

 

1.            I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q****of Uranium Resources, Inc.;

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer asof, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 

4.            The issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

 

b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theissuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change inthe issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theissuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’s first fiscal quarter of theannual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.            The issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the  issuer’s auditors and the audit committee ofissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  | May 12, 2008                      |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                   |
|   |                                   |
|   | /s/ Thomas H. Ehrlich                  |
|   | Title:  Vice  President - Finance |
|   | and Chief Financial  Officer           |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,274
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,333
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    101,988
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         223,877
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           225,992
<LOANS>                                        299,404
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,191
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 668,619
<DEPOSITS>                                     509,806
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,652
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,246
<LONG-TERM>                                    112,147
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           262
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,506
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 668,619
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,090
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,334
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,424
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,434
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,136
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,288
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,287
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,941
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,241
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,241
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.47
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,981
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   618
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,138
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        8
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,191
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,191
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,935
        

</TABLE>
11098.

#### Scott *v.*Sanders.

Broyles, C. J.

1. The common-law rule that where, through the negligent keeping of a hog by its owner, it strayed upon the land of another and injured his crops, it was a trespass fqr which the owner of the hog was answerable in damages, and the party injured might either impound the animal until his damages should be satisfied by the owner, or might bring an action for the trespass, is still of force in this State; and it is immaterial whether the stock law was of force in the county. The remedy given by the stock law in our code is not exclusive, but cumulative. *Bonner*v. *DeLoach,*78 *Ga.*50 (2 S. E. 546).

2. Under the above ruling the defendant in the instant ease had a right tp impound the hog until its owner had satisfied his damages. His posses*22sion, therefore, was lawful, and the owner of the hog could not recover it by a suit in trover.

Decided March 3, 1920.

Trover; from city court-of Dublin — Judge Elynt. November 17, 1919.

*S. P. New,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. C. Davis,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
##### 



Exhibit 32.A CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2003, of ANR Pipeline Company (the Company) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John W.
Somerhalder II, Chairman of the Board, certify (i) that the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. /s/ John W. Somerhalder IIJohn W. Somerhalder IIMarch 29, 2005
    Chairman of the Board

(Principal Executive Officer) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ANR Pipeline Company and will be retained by ANR Pipeline Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131385(66) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 131385 

 COA: 256878 

Livingston CC: 04-014120-FH

DENISE LOUISE POWELL,

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_______________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 

22, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously. 

CAVANAGH, J., would grant the motion for reconsideration. 

KELLY, J., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would grant leave 

to appeal for the reasons stated in her dissenting statement in People v Powell, 477 Mich 

860 (2006). 

d0319 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 26, 2007 

 Clerk
11090.

#### Wilson *v.*Small, administrator.

Broyles, C. J.

When this ease was here before (20 *Ga. App.*674, 93 S. E. 518), the controlling questions of law were settled by this court, and the rulings then made became the law of the ease. Upon the trial now under review the evidence did not demand the verdict *20returned, and the court accordingly did not err in granting a new trial, it being the first grant thereof to the defendant in error.

Decided March 3, 1920.

Trover; from city court of Macon — Judge Guerry. September 19, 1919.

*Hardeman, Jones, Park & Johnston,*for plaintiff.

*Gunn & Powers, P. F. Brock,*for defendant.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual Report on Form 10-K of Monmouth Capital Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Eugene W. Landy, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Anna T. Chew, as Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

















By:       /s/ Eugene W. Landy

Name:  Eugene W. Landy

Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:   March 20, 2007













By:       /s/ Anna T. Chew

Name:  Anna T. Chew

Title:    Chief Financial Officer

Date:    March 20, 2007
Exhibit 21.1

WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARIES OF NASH FINCH COMPANY

|Subsidiary Corporation                               |  | State of
Incorporation
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Erickson's Diversified Corporation
Edina, Minnesota  |  | Wisconsin             
|GTL Truck Lines, Inc.
Omaha, Nebraska                |  | Nebraska              
|Hinky Dinky Supermarkets, Inc.
Edina, Minnesota      |  | Nebraska              
|Nash Finch Funding Corp.
Edina, Minnesota            |  | Delaware              
|Piggly Wiggly Northland Corporation
Edina, Minnesota |  | Minnesota             
|Super Food Services, Inc.
Dayton, Ohio               |  | Delaware              
|T.J. Morris Company
Statesboro, Georgia              |  | Georgia               
|U-Save Foods, Inc.
Edina, Minnesota                  |  | Nebraska              

1

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Mines Management, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James H. Moore, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Mines Management, Inc.,, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 2, 2005

/s/ James H. Moore

________________________________

James H. Moore

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1491 

To amend the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 to increase the 

maximum loan amount for certain loans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2023 

Mr. CROW (for himself and Mr. BACON) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 to 

increase the maximum loan amount for certain loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Energy 

5 Loan Enhancement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CERTAIN MAXIMUM LOAN AMOUNTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 502(2)(A) of the Small 

8 Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 696(2)(A)) 

9 is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1491 IH

1 (1) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘$5,500,000’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’; and 

3 (2) in clause (v), by striking ‘‘$5,500,000’’ and 

4 inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’. 

5 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date 

6 of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Ad7 ministrator of the Small Business Administration shall 

8 submit to Congress a report that details, for the year cov9 ered by the report, the industries and geographic areas 

10 with respect to which the Administrator has made loans 

11 under clauses (iv) and (v) of section 502(2)(A) of the 

12 Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 

13 696(2)(A)), as amended by subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
11052.

#### Payne *v.*Shirley *et al.*

Decided September 17, 1920.

Appeal; from Hart superior court — Judge Hodges. September 24, 1919.

*T. Lumpkin Adderholt, Hammond Johnson,*for plaintiff in error.

*James H. & Emmett Skelton,*contra.

Stephens, J.

1. Where an application for the appointment of an administrator is filed, and a caveat thereto is filed by one who had been appointed guardian of the deceased under a commission of lunacy issued under the Civil Code (1910), § 3092, the ground of the caveat being that the caveator, as guardian, was by operation of law the administrator of the estate, such ground of the caveat cannot be sustained where it appears that the guardianship appointment was void for want of jurisdiction on the part of the ordinary to entertain the application.

2. The ordinary has no authority to issue a commission of lunacy or for the appointment of a guardian under the Civil Code (1910), § 3092, where it appears that the alleged lunatic or ward has three adult relatives in the State, until after the expiration of ten days from the time such relatives have received notice of the application. The commission in this case having been issued on the same day on which the application was filed, the appointment of the guardian was void. *Yeomans*v. *Williams,*117 *Ga.*800 (45 S. E. 73); *Allen*v. *Barnwell, 120 Ga. 537*(48 S. E. 76).

3. The invalidity of the appointment of the guardian appearing upon the face of the record, the judgment of appointment may be attacked collaterally. Civil Code (1910), §§ 5966, 5968.

4. The judgment refusing to sustain the caveat was proper.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*
Exhibit 10.v




Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock
And Restricted Stock Agreement  Employee

        MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION
ID:  41-0908057
14000 Technology Drive
Eden Prairie, MN  55344Alfred Richter
14000 Technology Driver
Eden Prairie, MN 55344

        Plan:                        2006




Effective April 15, 2009, you have been granted9,351shares of MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION (the Company) stock pursuant to the Companys 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan), subject to restrictions on your right to transfer the Shares.



The per Share value on the date of grant is $0.00.



Restriction on Shares under this Grant will lapse with respect to the number of Shares on the dates shown below, and are subject to earlier lapse as described below:



Shares

        Date Restriction Lapse3,117

        4/15/20103,117

        4/15/20113,117

        4/15/2012




By accepting this grant via your signature below, you and the Company agree that the Restricted Stock evidenced by this Restricted Stock Agreement is subject to the following:



A.

        This Agreement and the Shares are governed by all the terms, provisions and conditions set forth in the Companys 2006 Stock IncentivePlan and by Uniform Terms and Conditions Applicable to Restricted Stock Grants (Employee)adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company, which are incorporated herein.


B.

        Neither the Plan nor this Agreement confers any right with respect to continuance of your services to the Company or any of its subsidiaries nor restricts your right to terminate services to the Company at any time.


C.

        All restrictions shall lapse upon or immediately prior to the occurrence of a Change in Control as set forth in the Uniform Terms and Conditions Applicable to Restricted Stock Grants (Employee).


D.

        The Company may amend or terminate the Plan and this Agreement at any time, provided that no such action shall impair any rights that have accrued at the time of amendment or termination without your consent.




MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

        

        Date




EMPLOYEE

        

        Date




Please sign and date and return to:

Mr. Matt Eich

MTS Systems Corporation

14000 Technology Drive, MS125

Eden Prairie, MN  55344



---
Exhibit
      32





**CERTIFICATION***


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vineyard National Bancorp (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September
      30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the “Report”), the undersigneds hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the undersigneds’ best knowledge and belief:





(a)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(b)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated
      this 5th day of November, 2007





Vineyard
      National Bancorp


("Company")





/s/
      Norman
      A. Morales


*_______________________________*


Norman
      A.
      Morales


President
      and Chief Executive Officer





/s/
      Gordon Fong


*________________________________*


Gordon
      Fong


Executive
      Vice President and


Chief
      Financial Officer





___________________





***
*A
      signed original of this written
      statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
      be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.***