alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO**

 

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with thereport of Gaiam, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2008, as filed with the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jirka Rysavy, Chairman of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)     The Report fully complies with therequirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2)     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Date:  March 12, 2009

 
|   | /s/ Jirka Rysavy              |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Jirka Rysavy                  |
|   | Chairman                      |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000840459
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND XVIII LTD PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         989,784
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,966
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,002,750
<PP&E>                                      15,777,930
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,418,535)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,362,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          500,183
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,861,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,362,145
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               970,598
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  331,782
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                665,486
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            665,486
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   665,486
<EPS-BASIC>                                      32.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    32.14


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of SWK Holdings Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Brett Pope Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.01, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







|Date: July 25, 2013 |  | /s/ J. Brett Pope                    
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                    |  | J. Brett Pope
Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
11481.

#### Griffis *v.*Buckofzer.

Decided July 19, 1920.

Certiorari; from Eulton superior court-—Judge Bell. March 24, 1920.

*Moore & Pomeroy, Coles & Savage,*for plaintiff.

*Walter W. Visanska,*for defendant.

Smith, J.

1. Where a guest of a hotel leaves upon the bed of the room occupied by him a large sum of money, approximately $176, together with a railroad ticket, and there is posted upon the door of the room the following notice: “The management will not be responsible for money, jewelry, or other valuables of any kind, unless deposited in the office for safe-keeping and a receipt given for the same,” the innkeeper will not be liable for the loss of such money or other property, if he has complied with section 3510 of the Civil Code (1910) by providing “an iron safe, or other place of deposit for valuable articles, and by posting a notice thereof.” *Jones*v. *Savannah Hotel Co.,*141 *Ga.*530 (81 S. E. 874, 51 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1168).

2. The undisputed evidence showing that the notice set out above was in fact posted upon the door of the room occupied by the plaintiff, and that the hotel-keeper had a safe for the deposit of money and valuables of guests, the evidence demanded a verdict for the defendant, and the trial judge did not err in directing such a verdict.

3. The assignments of error as to the admission and exclusion of evidence will not be considered, as they are not insisted upon by the plaintiff in error.

4. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
#### THE STATE ex rel. HEAVEN, Appellant, v. HAWES et al.

In Banc,

November 3, 1903.

The judgment in this case is affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Rife v. Hawes, reported at page 360 of this volume.

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hem. *O’Neil Ryan,*Judge.

Affirmed.

*Joseph Wheless*for appellant.

*C. W. Bates*and *Wm. F. Woerner*for respondents.

GANTT, J.

Mandamus for $745.30 salary as turnkey from June 16, 1897, to May 30, 1898. Judgment for defendants, and relator appealed.

Relator was appointed turnkey bn May 30, 1886, and retired on half pay on June 16, 1897. He claims he was entitled to a term of four years from May 30, 1886, and to successive terms of four years each, by implication, from May 30, 1890, and May 30, 1894, re*403spectively, and that he was removed during the last implied term. He never had a term. If he ever had, he fully served it out, and when he was retired he was holding simply at the pleasure of the board. [State ex rel. Rife v. Hawes, reported at page 360 of this volume.]

The judgment of the circuit court is for the right party and it is affirmed.

All concur.
#### Samuel Mills *v.*William R. Early.

Sale of Land — Description—Judgment.

Land sought to be subjected to sale to satisfy a debt must be described in the petition so that the commissioner to make sale can identify the land from an examination of the petition and papers in the suit. A judgment for plaintiff on such a defective petition will be reversed.

*111APPEAL PROM OHIO CIRCUIT COURT.

October 2, 1874.

*Massie & Chápese, for appellant.*

*Sweeney & Ellis, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

The land sought to be subjected to sale to satisfy appellee’s debt is not sufficiently identified by the description given in the petition. It is represented in the petition as “Beginning at a point on the north fork of Adam’s fork of Rough creek in Ohio county, being on the east side of the north fork and the south half of 354 acres of land conveyed to William B. Early by deed dated March 19, 1870, recorded,” etc., to which reference is made in the petition; but that deed is not filed as an exhibit. The clerk states there is no such deed in the papers. It is alleged that by the terms of the conveyance to defendant, a lien was retained for the unpaid purchase money, and a deed from Early to appellant is copied in the record, but it is not made a part of the petition, nor is it alleged that appellant accepted it. Said deed was made a part of the answer which appellant filed in the case, but appellee demurred to that answer, and his demurrer was sustained, so that it is not to be considered. The judgment directs the master to sell the land-in the petition mentioned, or so much thereof as may be necessary, etc., which requires the commissioner to determine judicially, by going to the clerk’s office and hunting the title papers, what land he must sell. This power the court cannot confer on him. '

The judgment should have contained such a description of the land as would have informed the commissioner of the precise tract or parcel of land he was required to sell, without reference to any evidence of title not in the papers of the suit, imposing on him no other duty than to sell the land specifically set forth in the judgment. This question has been repeatedly decided by this court heretofore.

Wherefore the judgment is *reversed*and the cause is remanded with directions for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Uniform Laws and Regulations 

in the areas of 

legal metrology and 

engine fuel quality 

as adopted by the 92nd National Conference on Weights and Measures 2007 

Editors: 

Tom Coleman 

Linda Crown 

Lynn Sebring 

Lisa Warfield 

Carol Hockert, Chief 

Weights and Measures Division 

National Institute of Standards and Technology 

Weights and Measures Division 

Gaithersburg, MD 20899-2600

U.S. Department of Commerce 

Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary 

Technology Administration 

Robert Cresanti, Under Secretary 

of Commerce for Technology

National Institute of 

Standards and Technology

William A. Jeffrey, Director

NIST Handbook130

2008 Edition 

Supersedes NIST Handbook 130, 2006 Edition 
Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an 

experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or 

endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, 

or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. 

National Institute of Standards and Technology Handbook 130, 2008 Edition 

Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Handb. 130, 2008 Ed., 268 pages (October 2008) 

CODEN: NIHAE2 

WASHINGTON: 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAN J. QUALE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00519-CG-M

)

UNIFUND CCR PARTNERS, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This cause is before the court on the parties’ joint stipulation for dismissal. (Doc. 42).

Accordingly, pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. 41(a)(2), it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and

DECREED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own

costs. 

DONE and ORDERED this 11th day of May, 2010. 

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00519-CG-M Document 43 Filed 05/11/10 Page 1 of 1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 146 

To prohibit the flying of any flag other than the United States flag over 

United States diplomatic and consular posts, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. DUNCAN (for himself, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. BISHOP

of North Carolina, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, and Mr. CARTER of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the flying of any flag other than the United 

States flag over United States diplomatic and consular 

posts, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Old Glory Only Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 146 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FLYING OF CERTAIN FLAGS OVER 

2 UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR 

3 POSTS. 

4 The Secretary of State shall ensure that no United 

5 States diplomatic or consular post flies any flag other than 

6 the United States flag over such post. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
USGv6 Test Selection Tables 

Intrusion Prevention Systems

F18-Conformance: Network Protection Capabilities R1v1.1

Applicable Profile: NIST SP 500-267B Revision 1 USGv6 Profile – November 2020.

Test Specification Id: 

• [NPP] Network Protection Products Test Specification, [editor: UNH InterOperability Laboratory]. 

Intrusion Prevention Systems Test Check List

Reference Test Specification 

Id Test Number Device Type

USGv6-R1 NPP NPP.1.1: Configuration of Protective Functionality NPP

USGv6-R1 NPP NPP.1.2: Configuration of Logging and Alert Facility 

Configurations NPP

USGv6-R1 NPP NPP.1.3: Selectively Restricting Rights to the 

Administrative Interface NPP

USGv6-R1 NPP NPP.1.4: Individual Rights NPP

USGv6-R1 NPP NPP.1.5: Administrative Communications NPP

USGv6-R1 NPP NPP.1.6: Persistence of Device Settings NPP

USGv6-R1 NPP NPP.1.7: Logging of Configuration Change NPP

USGv6-R1 NPP NPP.1.8: Fragmented Packet NPP

USGv6-R1 NPP NPP.1.9: Tunneled Traffic (A)(B)(C)(D) NPP

USGv6-R1 NPP NPP.4.1: Implement Intrusion Detection Capabilities 

(A)(B)(C)(D) NPP

USGv6-R1 NPP NPP.4.2: Stop or Attenuate Detected Attacks NPP

References: 

• [NIST IPv6 Profile] “NIST IPv6 Profile”, NIST Special Publication (NIST SP) – 500-267Ar1, November 

2020.

• [USGv6-R1] “USGv6 Profile”, NIST Special Publication (NIST SP) – 500-267Br1, November 2020.

The objective of this test selection sheet is to provide a reference for available test specifications that identifies 

tests applicable to the USGv6 Profile.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. §1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Renaissance Entertainment Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Charles S. Leavell, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   | /s/ Charles S. Leavell                       |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Charles  S. Leavell                          |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Chief  Executive and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   | November 7,  2003                       |

 

----
[Exhibit 32.1]

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of BF Acquisition Group
IV,  Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending
April  30,  2001  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Colucci,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and
          (2)  The  information contained in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 16, 2004
                                   /s/ William Colucci
                                   ------------------------------
                                   William Colucci, President
                                   BF Acquisition Group II, Inc.
EXHIBIT 21


                            SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

                         NATIONAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.


                            STATE OR
                             OTHER
                          JURISDICTION
                               OF                   NAME UNDER WHICH
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY        INCORPORATION         SUBSIDIARY DOES BUSINESS
--------------------     ---------------      ----------------------------

Interpretive Scoring       Minnesota         National Computer Systems, Inc.
     Systems, Inc.                           NCS Assessments
                                             Professional Assessment
                                             Services Division of
                                             National Computer Systems, Inc.


Macro Educational          California        National Computer Systems, Inc.
     Systems, Inc.                           Education Systems and Services
                                             Division of National
                                             Computer Systems, Inc.


Note:  All  other  subsidiaries  of  National  Computer  Systems,  Inc.  are not
significant subsidiaries taken as a whole.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,298
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (92)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,299
<PP&E>                                             564
<DEPRECIATION>                                     450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,421
<BONDS>                                            448
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,770
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,966)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,848
<SALES>                                          5,229
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,493
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   568
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   202
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,033
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,349
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,344
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,004
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,004
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

** **

We consent to the incorporation byreference in each of the following Registration Statements of Gaiam, Inc.  of our report dated March 12, 2009, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Gaiam, Inc.and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2008.

 
| **Form** | ** ** | **Registration Statement** | ** ** | **Description**                                                                           |
|----------|------------|---------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| S-8      |       | 333-37700                       |       | Gaiam, Inc.  Long-Term Incentive Plan  Gaiam, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase |
|     |       |                            |       |                                                                                      |
| S-8      |       | 333-89726                       |       | Gaiam, Inc.  Long-Term Incentive Plan                                                |
|     |       |                            |       |                                                                                      |
| S-3      |       | 333-147237                      |       | Registration Statement                                                                    |

 

 
|                |   | /s/ Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner &  Hottman PC |
|---------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
| March 12, 2009 |   |                                              |
| Denver, Colorado    |   |                                              |

 

----