U.S. Department of Justice 

Office of Justice Programs 

National Institute of Justice 

A GUIDE for 

Explosion Explosion and 

Bombing Bombing SCENE INVESTIGATION 

research report 
U.S. Department of Justice 

Office of Justice Programs 

810 Seventh Street N.W. 

Washington, DC 20531 

Janet Reno 

Attorney General 

Daniel Marcus 

Acting Associate Attorney General 

Mary Lou Leary 

Acting Assistant Attorney General 

Julie E. Samuels 

Acting Director, National Institute of Justice 

Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice 

World Wide Web Site World Wide Web Site 

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij 
About the National Institute of Justice 

The National Institute of Justice (NIJ), a component of the Office of Justice Programs, is the 

research agency of the U.S. Department of Justice. Created by the Omnibus Crime Control 

and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, NIJ is authorized to support research, evaluation, 

and demonstration programs, development of technology, and both national and international 

information dissemination. Specific mandates of the Act direct NIJ to: 

• Sponsor special projects and research and development programs that will improve and 

strengthen the criminal justice system and reduce or prevent crime. 

• Conduct national demonstration projects that employ innovative or promising 

approaches for improving criminal justice. 

• Develop new technologies to fight crime and improve criminal justice. 

• Evaluate the effectiveness of criminal justice programs and identify programs that 

promise to be successful if continued or repeated. 

• Recommend actions that can be taken by Federal, State, and local governments as well 

as by private organizations to improve criminal justice. 

• Carry out research on criminal behavior. 

• Develop new methods of crime prevention and reduction of crime and delinquency. 

In recent years, NIJ has greatly expanded its initiatives, the result of the Violent Crime 

Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (the Crime Act), partnerships with other Federal 

agencies and private foundations, advances in technology, and a new international focus. 

Examples of these new initiatives include: 

• Exploring key issues in community policing, violence against women, violence within 

the family, sentencing reforms, and specialized courts such as drug courts. 

• Developing dual-use technologies to support national defense and local law enforcement 

needs. 

• Establishing four regional National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology 

Centers and a Border Research and Technology Center. 

• Strengthening NIJ’s links with the international community through participation in the 

United Nations network of criminological institutes, the U.N. Criminal Justice Information Network, and the NIJ International Center. 

• Improving the online capability of NIJ’s criminal justice information clearinghouse. 

• Establishing the ADAM (Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring) program—formerly the Drug 

Use Forecasting (DUF) program—to increase the number of drug-testing sites and study 

drug-related crime. 

The Institute Director establishes the Institute’s objectives, guided by the priorities of the 

Office of Justice Programs, the Department of Justice, and the needs of the criminal justice 

field. The Institute actively solicits the views of criminal justice professionals and researchers 

in the continuing search for answers that inform public policymaking in crime and 

justice. 

To find out more about the National Institute of Justice, 

please contact: 

National Criminal Justice Reference Service, 

P.O. Box 6000 

Rockville, MD 20849–6000 

800–851–3420 

e-mail: askncjrs@ncjrs.org 

To obtain an electronic version of this document, access the NIJ Web site 

(http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/pubs-sum/181869.htm). 

If you have questions, call or e-mail NCJRS. 
A Guide for Explosion and 

Bombing Scene Investigation 

Written and Approved by the 

Technical Working Group for Bombing Scene Investigation 

June 2000 

NCJ 181869 
Julie E. Samuels 

Acting Director 

David G. Boyd, Ph.D. 

Deputy Director 

Richard M. Rau, Ph.D. 

Project Monitor 

Opinions or points of view expressed in this document represent a 

consensus of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official 

position of the U.S. Department of Justice. 

The National Institute of Justice is a component of the Office of 

Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Assistance, 

the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the Office of Juvenile Justice and 

Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime. 
Message From the Attorney General 

The investigation conducted at the scene of an explosion or bombing

 plays a vital role in uncovering the truth about the incident. The 

evidence recovered can be critical in identifying, charging, and ultimately 

convicting suspected criminals. For this reason, it is absolutely essential 

that the evidence be collected in a professional manner that will yield 

successful laboratory analyses. One way of ensuring that we, as investigators, obtain evidence of the highest quality and utility is to follow 

sound protocols in our investigations. 

Recent cases in the criminal justice system have brought to light the need 

for heightened investigative practices at all crime scenes. In order to raise 

the standard of practice in explosion and bombing investigations of both 

small and large scale, in both rural and urban jurisdictions, the National 

Institute of Justice teamed with the National Center for Forensic Science 

at the University of Central Florida to initiate a national effort. Together 

they convened a technical working group of law enforcement and legal 

practitioners, bomb technicians and investigators, and forensic laboratory 

analysts to explore the development of improved procedures for the 

identification, collection, and preservation of evidence at explosion and 

bombing scenes.

 This Guide was produced with the dedicated and enthusiastic participation of the seasoned professionals who served on the Technical Working 

Group for Bombing Scene Investigation. These 32 individuals brought 

together knowledge and practical experience from Federal law enforcement agencies—as well as from large and small jurisdictions across the 

United States—with expertise from national organizations and abroad. 

I applaud their efforts to work together over the course of 2 years in 

developing this consensus of recommended practices for public safety 

personnel. 

iii 
In developing its investigative procedures, every jurisdiction should give 

careful consideration to those recommended in this Guide and to its own 

unique local conditions and logistical circumstances. Although factors 

that vary among investigations may call for different approaches or even 

preclude the use of certain procedures described in the Guide, consideration of the Guide’s recommendations may be invaluable to a jurisdiction shaping its own protocols. As such, A Guide for Explosion and 

Bombing Scene Investigation is an important tool for refining investigative practices dealing with these incidents, as we continue our search 

for truth. 

Janet Reno 

iv 
Message From the President of the University of 

Central Florida 

The University of Central Florida (UCF) is proud to take a

 leading role in the investigation of fire and explosion scenes 

through the establishment of the National Center for Forensic Science 

(NCFS). The work of the Center’s faculty, staff, and students, in cooperation with the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), has helped produce 

the NIJ Research Report A Guide for Explosion and Bombing Scene 

Investigation. 

More than 150 graduates of UCF’s 25-year-old program in forensic 

science are now working in crime laboratories across the country. Our 

program enjoys an ongoing partnership with NIJ to increase knowledge 

and awareness of fire and explosion scene investigation. We anticipate 

that this type of mutually beneficial partnership between the university, 

the criminal justice system, and private industry will become even more 

prevalent in the future. 

As the authors of this Guide indicate, the field of explosion and bombing 

investigation lacks nationally coordinated investigative protocols. NCFS 

recognizes the need for this coordination. The Center maintains and 

updates its training criteria and tools so that it may serve as a national 

resource for public safety personnel who may encounter an explosion 

or bombing scene in the line of duty. 

I encourage interested and concerned public safety personnel to use A 

Guide for Explosion and Bombing Scene Investigation. The procedures 

recommended in the Guide can help to ensure that more investigations 

are successfully concluded through the proper identification, collection, 

and examination of all relevant forensic evidence. 

Dr. John C. Hitt 

v 
Technical Working Group for Bombing Scene Investigation 

The Technical Working Group for Bombing Scene Investigation 

(TWGBSI) is a multidisciplinary group of content area experts 

from the United States, Canada, and Israel, each representing his or her 

respective agency or practice. Each of these individuals is experienced in 

the investigation of explosions, the analysis of evidence gathered, or the 

use in the criminal justice system of information produced by the investigation. They represent such entities as fire departments, law enforcement 

agencies, forensic laboratories, private companies, and government 

agencies. 

At the outset of the TWGBSI effort, the National Institute of Justice 

(NIJ) and the National Center for Forensic Science (NCFS) created the 

National Bombing Scene Planning Panel (NBSPP)—composed of distinguished law enforcement officers, representatives of private industry, and 

researchers—to define needs, develop initial strategies, and steer the larger 

group. Additional members of TWGBSI were then selected from recommendations solicited from NBSPP; NIJ’s regional National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Centers; and national organizations and 

agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Bureau of Alcohol, 

Tobacco and Firearms, the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors, and the National District Attorneys Association. 

Collectively, over a 2-year period, the 32 members of TWGBSI listed 

below worked together to develop this handbook, A Guide for Explosion 

and Bombing Scene Investigation. 

National Bombing Scene Planning Panel of TWGBSI 

Joan K. Alexander Roger E. Broadbent John A. Conkling, Ph.D. 

Office of the Chief State’s Virginia State Police American Pyrotechnics 

Attorney Fairfax, Virginia Association 

Rocky Hill, Connecticut Chestertown, Maryland 

vii 
Sheldon Dickie 

Royal Canadian Mounted 

Police 

Gloucester, Ontario, Canada 

Ronald L. Kelly 

Federal Bureau of 

Investigation 

Washington, D.C. 

Jimmie C. Oxley, Ph.D. 

University of Rhode Island 

Kingston, Rhode Island 

Roger N. Prescott 

Austin Powder Company 

Cleveland, Ohio 

James C. Ronay 

Institute of Makers of 

Explosives 

Washington, D.C. 

James T. Thurman 

Eastern Kentucky University 

Richmond, Kentucky 

Carl Vasilko 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco 

and Firearms 

Washington, D.C. 

Raymond S. Voorhees 

U.S. Postal Inspection Service 

Dulles, Virginia 

Technical Working Group for Bombing Scene 

Investigation 

Andrew A. Apollony 

Federal Bureau of 

Investigation 

Quantico, Virginia 

Michael Boxler 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco 

and Firearms 

St. Paul, Minnesota 

Steven G. Burmeister 

Federal Bureau of 

Investigation 

Washington, D.C. 

Gregory A. Carl 

Federal Bureau of 

Investigation 

Washington, D.C. 

Stuart W. Case 

Forensic Consulting Services 

Pellston, Michigan 

Lance Connors 

Hillsborough County Sheriff’s 

Office 

Tampa, Florida 

James B. Crippin 

Colorado Bureau of 

Investigation 

Pueblo, Colorado 

John E. Drugan 

Massachusetts State Police 

Sudbury, Massachusetts 

Dirk Hedglin 

Great Lakes Analytical, Inc. 

St. Clair Shores, Michigan 

Larry Henderson 

Kentucky State Police 

Lexington, Kentucky 

Thomas H. Jourdan, Ph.D. 

Federal Bureau of 

Investigation 

Washington, D.C. 

Frank Malter 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco 

and Firearms 

Washington, D.C. 

Thomas J. Mohnal 

Federal Bureau of 

Investigation 

Washington, D.C. 

David S. Shatzer 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco 

and Firearms 

Washington, D.C. 

Patricia Dawn Sorenson 

Naval Criminal Investigative 

Service 

San Diego, California 

Frank J. Tabert 

International Association of 

Bomb Technicians and 

Investigators 

Franklin Square, New York 

Calvin K. Walbert 

Chemical Safety and Hazard 

Investigation Board 

Washington, D.C. 

Leo W. West 

Federal Bureau of 

Investigation 

Washington, D.C. 

Carrie Whitcomb 

National Center for Forensic 

Science 

Orlando, Florida 

David M. Williams 

Lockheed Martin Energy 

Systems 

Oak Ridge, Tennessee 

Jehuda Yinon, Ph.D. 

Weizmann Institute of Science 

Rehovot, Israel 

viii 
Acknowledgments 

The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) acknowledges, with great

 thanks, the members of the Technical Working Group for Bombing 

Scene Investigation (TWGBSI) for their extensive efforts on this project 

and their dedication to improving the level of explosion and bombing 

investigations for the good of the criminal justice system. Each of the 32 

members of this network of experts gave their time and expertise to draft 

and review the Guide, providing feedback and perspective from a variety 

of disciplines and from all areas of the United States, Canada, and Israel. 

The true strength of this Guide is derived from their commitment to 

develop procedures that could be implemented across the country, from 

rural townships to metropolitan areas. In addition, thanks are extended 

to the agencies and organizations the Technical Working Group (TWG) 

members represent for their flexibility and support, which enabled the 

participants to see this project to completion. 

NIJ is immensely grateful to the National Center for Forensic Science 

(NCFS) at the University of Central Florida, particularly Director Carrie 

Whitcomb and Project Coordinator Joan Jarvis, for its coordination of 

the TWGBSI effort. NCFS’s support in planning and hosting the TWG 

meetings, as well as the support of its staff in developing the Guide, 

made this work possible. 

Additionally, thanks are extended to all the individuals, agencies, and 

organizations across the country who participated in the review of this 

Guide and provided valuable comments and input. In particular, thanks 

go to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, the Federal Bureau 

of Investigation, the National District Attorneys Association, the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors, the International Association of Arson Investigators, and the International Association of Bomb 

Technicians and Investigators. While all review comments were given 

careful consideration by the TWG in developing the final document, the 

review by these organizations is not intended to imply their endorsement 

of the Guide. 

ix 
NIJ would like to thank the co-manager for this project, Kathleen 

Higgins, for her advice and significant contribution to the development 

of the Guide. 

Special thanks go to former NIJ Director Jeremy Travis for his support 

and guidance and to Lisa Forman, Lisa Kaas, and Anjali Swienton for 

their contributions to the TWG program. Thanks also go to Rita Premo 

of Aspen Systems Corporation, who provided tireless work editing and 

re-editing the various drafts of the Guide. 

Finally, NIJ would like to acknowledge Attorney General Janet Reno, 

whose support and commitment to the improvement of the criminal 

justice system made this work possible. 

x 
Contents 

Message From the Attorney General .............................................................. iii 

Message From the President of the University of Central Florida ................ v 

Technical Working Group for Bombing Scene Investigation ...................... vii 

Acknowledgments ..............................................................................................ix 

Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 

Purpose and Scope .................................................................................... 1 

Statistics on Bombings and Other Explosives-Related Incidents ............. 2 

Background............................................................................................... 4 

Training .................................................................................................... 8 

Authorization ............................................................................................ 8 

A Guide for Explosion and Bombing Scene Investigation .............................. 9 

Section A. Procuring Equipment and Tools ....................................... 11 

Safety ............................................................................................ 11 

General Crime Scene Tools/Equipment ........................................ 12 

Scene Documentation ................................................................... 12 

Evidence Collection ...................................................................... 13 

Specialized Equipment.................................................................. 14 

Section B. Prioritizing Initial Response Efforts ................................. 15 

1. Conduct a Preliminary Evaluation of the Scene ....................... 15 

2. Exercise Scene Safety ............................................................... 16 

3. Administer Lifesaving Efforts ................................................... 17 

4. Establish Security and Control.................................................. 17 

xi 
Section C. Evaluating the Scene .......................................................... 19 

1. Define the Investigator Role ..................................................... 19 

2. Ensure Scene Integrity .............................................................. 20 

3. Conduct the Scene Walkthrough ............................................... 21 

4. Secure Required Resources....................................................... 21 

Section D. Documenting the Scene ...................................................... 23 

1. Develop Written Documentation .............................................. 23 

2. Photograph/Videotape the Scene .............................................. 23 

3. Locate and Interview Victims and Witnesses ............................ 24 

Section E. Processing Evidence at the Scene ...................................... 27 

1. Assemble the Evidence Processing Team ................................. 27 

2. Organize Evidence Processing .................................................. 28 

3. Control Contamination ............................................................. 28 

4. Identify, Collect, Preserve, Inventory, Package, and 

Transport Evidence ................................................................ 29 

Section F. Completing and Recording the Scene Investigation ........ 33 

1. Ensure That All Investigative Steps Are Documented .............. 33 

2. Ensure That Scene Processing Is Complete .............................. 34 

3. Release the Scene ...................................................................... 35 

4. Submit Reports to the Appropriate National Databases ........... 35 

Appendix A. Sample Forms ................................................................. 37 

Appendix B. Further Reading ............................................................. 47 

Appendix C. List of Organizations ..................................................... 49 

Appendix D. Investigative and Technical Resources ......................... 51 

xii 
Introduction 

“I had imagined that Sherlock Holmes would have at once hurried 

into the house and plunged into a study of the mystery. Nothing 

appeared to be further from his intention. He lounged up and 

down the pavement and gazed vacantly at the ground, the sky, the 

opposite houses. Having finished his scrutiny, he proceeded slowly 

down the path, keeping his eyes riveted on the ground.” 

Dr. Watson 

A Study in Scarlet 

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle 

Sherlock Holmes, the master of detectives, considered it essential to be 

excruciatingly disciplined in his approach to looking for evidence at a 

crime scene. While it is imperative that all investigators apply discipline 

in their search for evidence, it is apparent that few do so in the same way. 

Currently, there are no nationally accepted guidelines or standard practices 

for conducting explosion or bombing scene investigations. Professional 

training exists through Federal, State, and local agencies responsible for 

these investigations, as well as through some organizations and academic 

institutions. The authors of this Guide strongly encourage additional 

training for public safety personnel. 

Purpose and Scope 

The principal purpose of this Guide is to provide an investigative outline 

of the tasks that should be considered at every explosion scene. They will 

ensure that proper procedures are used to locate, identify, collect, and 

preserve valuable evidence so that it can be examined to produce the 

most useful and effective information—best practices. This Guide was 

designed to apply to explosion and bombing scene investigations, from 

highly complex and visible cases, such as the bombing of the Alfred P. 

Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, to those that attract less 

attention and fewer resources but may be just as complex for the investigator. Any guide addressing investigative procedures must ensure that 

1 
each contributor of evidence to the forensic laboratory system is served 

by the guide and that quality examinations will be rendered. Consistent 

collection of quality evidence in bombing cases will result in more 

successful investigations and prosecutions of bombing cases. While 

this Guide can be useful to agencies in developing their own procedures, 

the procedures included here may not be deemed applicable in every 

circumstance or jurisdiction, nor are they intended to be all-inclusive. 

Statistics on Bombings and Other 

Explosives-Related Incidents 

The principal Federal partners in the collection of data related to explosives incidents in the United States are the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco 

and Firearms (ATF), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the U.S. 

Postal Inspection Service (USPIS), and the U.S. Fire Administration 

(USFA). These Federal partners collect and compile information supplied by State and local fire service and law enforcement agencies 

throughout the United States and many foreign countries. 

According to ATF and FBI databases, there were approximately 38,362 

explosives incidents from 1988 through 1997 (the latest year for which 

complete data were available) in the United States, including Guam, 

Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Incident reports received by 

ATF and the FBI indicate that the States with the most criminal bombing 

incidents are traditionally California, Florida, Illinois, Texas, and Washington. Criminal bombings and other explosives incidents have occurred 

in all States, however, and the problem is not limited to one geographic 

or demographic area of the country. 

The number of criminal bombing incidents (bombings, attempted 

bombings, incendiary bombings, and attempted incendiary bombings) 

reported to ATF, the FBI, and USPIS fluctuated in the years 1993–97, 

ranging between 2,217 in 1997 and 3,163 in 1994. Incendiary incidents 

reached a high of 725 in both 1993 and 1994. Explosives incidents 

2 
reached a high of 2,438 in 1994 and a low of 1,685 in 1997. It is important to note that these numbers reflect only the incidents reported to 

Federal databases and do not fully reflect the magnitude of the problem 

in the United States. 

Of the criminal bombing incidents reported during 1993–97, the top 

three targets—collectively representing approximately 60 percent of 

the incidents—were residential properties, mailboxes, and vehicles. 

Motives are known for about 8,000 of these incidents, with vandalism 

and revenge by far cited most frequently. 

The most common types of explosive/incendiary devices encountered 

by fire service and law enforcement personnel in the United States are 

traditionally pipe bombs, Molotov cocktails, and other improvised 

explosive/incendiary devices. The most common explosive materials 

used in these devices are flammable liquids and black and smokeless 

powder. 

Stolen explosives also pose a significant threat to public safety in the 

United States. From 1993 to 1997, more than 50,000 pounds of high 

explosives, low explosives, and blasting agents and more than 30,000 

detonators were reported stolen. Texas, Pennsylvania, California, 

Tennessee, and North Carolina led the Nation in losses, but every State 

reported losses. 

Further information, including updated and specific statistical information, can be obtained by contacting the ATF Arson and Explosives 

National Repository at 800–461–8841 or 202–927–4590, through its 

Web site at http://ows.atf.treas.gov:9999, or by calling the FBI Bomb 

Data Center at 202–324–2696. 

3 
Background 

National Bombing Scene Planning Panel (NBSPP) 

The National Center for Forensic Science (NCFS) at the University of 

Central Florida (UCF) in Orlando, a grantee of the National Institute of 

Justice (NIJ), held a National Needs Symposium on Arson and Explosives in August 1997. The symposium’s purpose was to identify problem 

areas associated with the collection and analysis of fire and explosion 

debris. One of the problem areas identified was the need for improved, 

consistent evidence recognition and handling procedures. 

In spring 1998, NIJ and NCFS, using NIJ’s template for creating technical working groups, decided to develop guidelines for fire/arson and 

explosion/bombing scene investigations. The NIJ Director selected 

members for a planning group to craft the explosion/bombing investigation guidelines—NBSPP. At the same time, the NIJ Director selected a 

fire/arson planning panel. The nine NBSPP members represent national 

and international organizations whose constituents are responsible for 

investigating explosion and bombing scenes and evaluating evidence 

from these investigations. The group also includes one academic researcher. The rationale for their involvement was twofold: 

u They represent the diversity of the professional discipline. 

u Each organization is a key stakeholder in the conduct of explosion 

and bombing investigations and the implementation of this Guide. 

NBSPP was charged with developing an outline for national guidelines 

for explosion and bombing scene investigations—using the format 

in the NIJ publication Death Investigation: A Guide for the Scene 

Investigator1 as a template—and identifying the expertise composition of 

a technical working group for explosion/bombing scene investigations. 

This task was completed in March 1998 at a meeting at NCFS; the 

results are presented here. 

4 
Technical Working Group for Bombing Scene 

Investigation (TWGBSI) 

Candidates for TWGBSI were recommended by national law enforcement, prosecution, forensic sciences, and bomb technician organizations 

and commercial interests and represented a multidisciplinary group of 

both national and international organizations. These individuals are all 

content area experts who serve within the field every day. The following 

criteria were used to select the members of TWGBSI: 

u Each member was nominated/selected for the position by NBSPP 

and NCFS. 

u Each member had specific knowledge regarding explosion and 

bombing investigation. 

u Each member had specific experience with the process of explosion 

and bombing investigation and the outcomes of positive and negative 

scene investigations. 

u Each member could commit to the project for the entire period. 

The 32 experts selected as members of TWGBSI came from 3 countries 

(the United States, Canada, and Israel), 13 States, and the District of 

Columbia. Because this technical working group dealt with explosion 

and bombing scenes, a large portion of investigators and analysts represented ATF and the FBI. The geographical distribution of TWGBSI 

members is shown in exhibit 1. 

Chronology of Work 

NBSPP meeting. In March 1998, the panel met at UCF, under the sponsorship of NCFS, to review the existing literature and technologies, prepare 

the project objectives, and begin the guideline development process. The 

panel’s objective was to develop an outline for a set of national guidelines 

based on existing literature and present them for review to the assembled 

TWGBSI at a later date. During this initial session, five investigative tasks 

were identified. Each task included subsections that, when developed, 

provided a template of procedures for investigators to follow while 

conducting an explosion or bombing investigation. 

5 
Exhibit 1. Technical Working Group for Bombing Scene Investigation 

Membership Distribution 

Northeast 

Southeast 

Rocky Mountain 

Canada 

Israel 

West Law Enforcement Prosecutors 

Laboratory Staff Researchers 

Practitioners 

Region Number of Participants 

Northeast 20 

Southeast 8 

Rocky Mountain 1 

West 1 

International 2 

The completed Guide includes the following components: 

u A principle citing the rationale for performing the task. 

u The procedure for performing the task. 

u A summary outlining the principle and procedure. 

TWGBSI assembled in August 1998. After introductory remarks from 

the president of UCF, TWGBSI separated into five breakout sections to 

draft the Guide, which includes the following stages: 

u Prioritizing initial response efforts. 

u Evaluating the scene. 

6
u Documenting the scene. 

u Processing evidence at the scene. 

u Completing and recording the scene investigation. 

Once all breakout groups completed their work, the full group reassembled to review and approve the initial draft. Editors from an NIJ 

contractor attended each section to record the proceedings and guide 

the editorial process. After the meeting, the editors reformatted the 

initial draft and forwarded it to an agency representative so that it 

could be sent to all TWGBSI members for comment. 

Organizational review and national reviewer network. After the 

TWGBSI comments were received by NIJ, NBSPP met in November 

and December 1998 in Washington, D.C., to consider and incorporate 

the comments, creating the second draft of the Guide. In addition, 

NBSPP members recommended organizations, agencies, and individuals 

they felt should comment on the draft document, which was mailed to 

all TWGBSI members and to this wider audience in June 1999. The 150 

organizations and individuals whose comments were solicited during 

the national review of this Guide included all levels of law enforcement, 

regional and national organizations, and bomb response units from the 

United States, Canada, and other nations. A list of reviewers can be 

found in appendix C. 

NBSPP members reassembled in August 1999 to incorporate the comments received from the initial wide review. Following this meeting, a 

third draft of the Guide was sent to all TWGBSI members for discussion 

and review within their organizations and agencies. In October 1999, the 

TWGBSI members met to review and recommend changes to this third 

draft. Another national and organizational review followed, and results 

were discussed by TWGBSI at a meeting in January 2000. What follows 

is the final consensus document resulting from the final meeting. 

7 
Training 

For each of the procedures presented in this Guide, training criteria will 

be developed and approved by NCFS’s Technical Working Group on Fire 

and Explosions. These criteria will provide individuals and educational 

organizations with an additional resource for providing comprehensive 

instruction to public safety personnel. A current listing of institutions 

that can provide training in the area of explosion/bombing investigation 

can be obtained from NCFS (see appendix D). 

Authorization 

Federal, State, and local statutory authority in explosion and bombing 

cases is enforced by the agencies responsible for the specific incident 

and varies greatly depending on the specific location and nature of the 

incident. 

Note 

1. Death Investigation: A Guide for the Scene Investigator, Research 

Report, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute 

of Justice, December 1997, NCJ 167568. 

8 
A Guide for Explosion and Bombing Scene Investigation 

Section A 

Section B 

Section C 

Section D 

Section E 

Section F 

Procuring Equipment and Tools 

Prioritizing Initial Response Efforts 

Documenting the Scene 

Processing Evidence at the Scene 

Completing and Recording the Scene 

Investigation 

Evaluating the Scene 

9 
This handbook is intended as a guide to recommended practices 

for the identification, collection, and preservation of evidence at 

explosion and bombing scenes. Jurisdictional, logistical, or legal 

conditions may preclude the use of particular procedures contained 

here. Not every portion of this document may be applicable to all 

explosion and bombing scenes. The investigator will determine the 

applicability of these procedures to a particular incident. 

10 
 

Section A. Procuring Equipment and Tools 

Possessing the proper tools and equipment is key to any task, and never 

more so than in emergency situations such as explosion or bombing 

scenes. Because responders and investigators may not know the details 

of the situation until arriving at the scene, prior preparation is vital. 

Following is a list of equipment and tools frequently used by the investigative team at explosion and bombing scenes. Equipment and tool needs 

are, for the most part, determined by the actual scene. The list below may 

be used as a planning guide for equipment and tool needs. Not every item 

and tool mentioned below will be applicable for use on every scene. 

Safety 

u Biohazard materials (i.e., bags, tags, labels). 

u First-aid kit. 

u Footwear, safety (i.e., protective shoes/boots). 

u Glasses, safety. 

u Gloves, heavy and disposable (e.g., surgical, latex). 

u Helmets, safety/hard hats. 

u Kneepads. 

u Outerwear, protective (e.g., disposable suits, weather gear). 

u Personnel support items (e.g., food, water, hygiene items, shelter). 

u Reflective tape. 

u Respiratory equipment (e.g., particle masks, breathing equipment). 

A 

11 
General Crime Scene Tools/Equipment 

u Barrier tape/perimeter rope. 

u Batteries. 

u Binoculars. 

u Communications equipment (e.g., telephone, two-way radio). 

u Evidence collection kits (e.g., latent print, bodily fluid, impression, 

tool mark, trace evidence). 

u Flares. 

u Flashlights. 

u Generators. 

u Handtools (e.g., screwdrivers, crowbars, hammers). 

u Knives, utility. 

u Lighting, auxiliary. 

u Tarps/tents. 

u Thermometer. 

u Trashcans, large. 

u Tweezers/forceps. 

Scene Documentation 

u Compass. 

u Computer and computer-aided design (CAD) program. 

u Consent-to-search forms. 

u Drawing equipment (e.g., sketchbooks, pencils). 

u Logs (e.g., evidence recovery, photo). 

12 
A

u Measuring equipment (e.g., forensic mapping station, tape measure, 

tape wheel). 

u Photographic equipment (e.g., 35mm camera, Polaroid camera, 

videocamera, digital camera, film, lenses, tripods). 

u Tape recorder and cassettes. 

u Writing equipment (e.g., notebooks, pens, permanent markers). 

Evidence Collection 

u Bags, new (e.g., sealable, nylon). 

u Boxes, corrugated/fiberboard. 

u Brushes and brooms. 

u Cans, new (e.g., unlined). 

u Evidence flags/cones. 

u Evidence placards. 

u Evidence tags. 

u Evidence sealing tape. 

u Gloves (i.e., disposable cotton, disposable latex). 

u Grid markers. 

u Heat sealer. 

u Magnets. 

u Outerwear, protective (e.g., disposable suits, shoe covers). 

u Rakes, spades, and shovels. 

u Sifters/screens. 

u Swabbing kits. 

u Trowels. 

u Vacuum. 

13 
Specialized Equipment 

u Aerial survey/photography equipment (e.g., helicopter). 

u Chemical test kits and vapor detectors. 

u Construction equipment, heavy. 

u Extrication/recovery equipment. 

u GPS (global positioning system) equipment. 

u Ladders. 

u Trace explosives detectors (e.g., sniffers) and/or detection canines. 

14 
Section B. Prioritizing Initial Response Efforts 

Note: Safety concerns should be continually addressed beginning with 

the initial response effort. Implementation of the procedures in this 

section will be determined by the scene circumstances. 

1. Conduct a Preliminary Evaluation 

of the Scene 

Principle: First responders (the first public safety personnel to 

arrive at the scene, whether law enforcement officers, 

firefighters, or emergency medical services (EMS) 

personnel) must assess the scene quickly yet thoroughly 

to determine the course of action to be taken. This 

assessment should include the scope of the incident, 

emergency services required, safety concerns, and 

evidentiary considerations. 

Procedure: Upon arrival at the scene, first responders should: 

A. Establish a command post/implement an incident command 

system (i.e., a point of contact and line of communication and 

authority for other public safety personnel). 

B. Request emergency services from bomb technicians, firefighters, 

EMS personnel, and law enforcement officers. 

C. Identify scene hazards, such as structural collapse, bloodborne pathogens, hazardous chemicals, and secondary 

explosive devices. 

D. Identify witnesses, victims, and the presence of evidence. 

E. Preserve potentially transient physical evidence (e.g., evidence 

present on victims, evidence that may be compromised by 

weather conditions). 

B 

15 
DANGER: Beware of secondary devices! 

The scene may contain secondary explosive devices designed specifically 

to kill or maim public safety responders. Do not touch any suspicious 

items. If a suspected secondary device is located, immediately evacuate 

the area and contact bomb disposal personnel. 

Summary: Based on the preliminary evaluation, first responders 

will initiate an incident command system, request 

emergency services, and identify scene hazards and 

evidentiary concerns. 

2. Exercise Scene Safety 

Principle: Safety overrides all other concerns. First responders 

must take steps to identify and remove or mitigate safety 

hazards that may further threaten victims, bystanders, 

and public safety personnel. They must exercise due 

caution while performing emergency operations to avoid 

injuries to themselves and others. 

Procedure: Following the preliminary evaluation of the scene, first 

responders should: 

A. Request additional resources and personnel (e.g., bomb technicians, building inspectors, representatives from utility companies, 

such as gas, water, and electric) to mitigate identified hazards. 

B. Use tools and personal protective equipment appropriate to the 

task during all operations. 

C. Request and/or conduct a safety sweep of the area by personnel 

qualified to identify and evaluate additional hazards and safety 

concerns. 

D. Mark hazard areas clearly and designate safety zones to receive 

victims and evacuees. 

16 
Summary: To ensure safety, first responders will take steps to 

identify, evaluate, and mitigate scene hazards and 

establish safety zones. 

3. Administer Lifesaving Efforts 

Principle: First responders’ primary responsibility is to rescue 

living victims and provide treatment for life-threatening 

injuries. While performing emergency operations, they 

are to preserve evidence and avoid disturbing areas not 

directly involved in the rescue activities, including those 

areas containing fatalities. 

Procedure: After performing a preliminary evaluation and establishing scene safety, first responders should: 

A. Initiate rescues of severely injured and/or trapped victims. 

B. Evacuate ambulatory victims, perform triage, and treat lifethreatening injuries. 

C. Leave fatalities and their surroundings undisturbed. Removal of 

fatalities will await authorization. 

D. Avoid disturbing areas not directly involved in rescue activities. 

Summary: Lifesaving efforts are first responders’ priority. Additionally, care should be taken not to disturb areas where 

rescue activities are not taking place. 

4. Establish Security and Control 

Principle: First responders will establish control and restrict scene 

access to essential personnel, thereby aiding rescue 

efforts and scene preservation. First responders will 

initiate documentation. 

17 
Procedure: To establish security and control, first responders should: 

A. Set up a security perimeter. 

B. Restrict access into and out of the scene through the security 

perimeter (e.g., control media, bystanders, nonessential 

personnel). 

C. Establish staging areas to ensure that emergency vehicles have 

access into the area. 

D. Initiate documentation of the scene as soon as conditions permit 

(e.g., taking notes, identifying witnesses, videotaping/photographing bystanders). 

Summary: First responders will establish a controlled security 

perimeter, designate staging areas, and initiate 

documentation. This will set the stage for the 

subsequent investigation. 

18 
Note: At the time the scene is determined to involve a bombing or other 

crime, the investigator must address legal requirements for scene 

access, search, and evidence seizure. 

Section C. Evaluating the Scene 

1. Define the Investigator Role 

Principle: The investigator must coordinate with the incident 

commander and first responders to determine what 

occurred and to assess the current situation. Subsequent 

procedures will vary depending on the magnitude of the 

incident. 

Procedure: Upon arriving at and prior to entering the scene, the 

investigator should: 

A. Identify and introduce himself or herself to the incident 

commander. 

B. Interview the incident commander and first responders to evaluate 

the situation, including safety concerns, and determine the level 

of investigative assistance needed. 

C. Conduct a briefing with essential personnel (e.g., law enforcement, fire, EMS, hazardous materials, and utility services 

personnel) to: 

u Evaluate initial scene safety to the extent possible prior to 

entry. 

u Ensure that a search for secondary explosive devices has 

been conducted. 

C 

Caution: Only bomb disposal personnel should handle any suspected 

devices that are located. Take no further action until the devices have 

been identified or rendered safe. 

19 
u Ensure that the scene has been secured, that a perimeter and 

staging areas for the investigation have been established, and 

that all personnel have been advised of the need to prevent 

contamination of the scene. 

u Ensure that the chain of custody is initiated for evidence that 

may have been previously collected. 

D. Assess legal considerations for scene access (e.g., exigent circumstances, consent, administrative/criminal search warrants). 

Summary: The investigator will conduct a briefing to ensure scene 

safety and security, while addressing the issue of secondary devices. 

2. Ensure Scene Integrity 

Principle: The investigator must ensure the integrity of the scene 

by establishing security perimeters and staging areas, 

contamination control procedures, and evidence collection and control procedures. 

Procedure: Prior to evidence collection, the investigator should: 

A. Establish procedures to document personnel entering and exiting 

the scene. 

B. Establish and document procedures to prevent scene contamination. 

C. Establish and document procedures for evidence collection, 

control, and chain of custody (see the sample evidence recovery 

and chain of custody logs in appendix A). 

Summary: The investigator will establish and document procedures 

to protect the integrity of the scene. 

20 
3. Conduct the Scene Walkthrough 

Principle: The investigator must conduct a walkthrough to establish scene parameters and acquire an overview of the 

incident. 

Procedure: During the scene walkthrough, the investigator should: 

A. Reevaluate scene requirements (e.g., boundaries, personnel, 

equipment). 

B. Establish an entry and exit path for personnel. 

C. Be alert to safety concerns (e.g., structural damage, secondary 

devices, unconsumed explosive materials, failed utilities, hazardous materials) and to the locations of physical evidence. 

D. Ensure preservation and/or collection of transient evidence. 

E. Attempt to locate the seat(s) of the explosion(s). 

Summary: The investigator’s initial walkthrough will be an opportunity to identify evidence and the presence of safety 

hazards. 

4. Secure Required Resources 

Principle: Following the walkthrough, the investigator should meet 

with available emergency responders and investigative 

personnel to determine what resources, equipment, and 

additional personnel may be needed. 

Procedure: During the course of this meeting, the investigator 

should: 

A. Assess the nature and scope of the investigation through information obtained during the walkthrough and from all available 

personnel. 

21 
B. Advise personnel of any secondary devices or other hazards 

found at the scene. 

C. Ensure that one list of victims/potential witnesses is developed 

and that their accounts of the incident are documented. 

D. Ensure that required evidence collection equipment, as well as 

processing and storage facilities, are available. 

E. Secure required equipment as determined by the scene conditions, such as light and heavy equipment, handtools, specialty 

equipment, and personal safety items. 

F. Ensure that sufficient utilities and support services are requested 

(e.g., electricity, food, trash removal, sanitary services, other 

public services, security). 

G. Advise emergency responders and the investigation team of their 

assignments for scene documentation and processing. 

H. Remind personnel that evidence can take many forms; it is not 

limited solely to components of the device(s). 

Summary: The investigator will meet with emergency responders 

and investigative personnel in preparation for scene 

documentation and processing. 

22 
Section D. Documenting the Scene 

1. Develop Written Documentation 

Principle: The investigator will prepare written scene documentation to become part of the permanent record. 

Procedure: The investigator should: 

A. Document access to the scene (see the sample access control log 

in appendix A). 

B. Document activities, noting dates and times, associated with the 

incident and the investigation (see the sample activity log in 

appendix A). 

C. Describe the overall scene in writing, noting physical and environmental conditions (e.g., odors, weather, structural conditions) 

(see the sample narrative description in appendix A). 

D. Diagram and label scene features using sketches, floor plans, and 

architectural or engineering drawings. 

E. Describe and document the scene with measuring equipment, 

which may include surveying equipment, GPS (global positioning 

system) technology, or other available equipment. 

Summary: Investigators must prepare written scene documentation 

as part of the permanent record of the incident, which 

will serve as the foundation for any incident reconstructions and future proceedings. 

2. Photograph/Videotape the Scene 

D 

Principle: The investigator must ensure that photographic documentation is included in the permanent scene record. 

This documentation should be completed prior to the 

removal or disturbance of any items. 

23 
Procedure: The investigator should: 

A. Record overall views of the scene (e.g., wide angle, aerial, 

360-degree) to spatially relate items within and to the scene and 

surrounding area. (A combination of still photography, videotaping, and other techniques is most effective.) 

B. Consider muting the audio portion of any video recording unless 

there is narration. 

C. Minimize the presence of scene personnel in photographs/videos. 

D. Consider photographing/videotaping the assembled crowd. 

E. Maintain photo and video logs (see the sample photographic log 

in appendix A). 

Summary: The investigator will ensure the photographic documentation of the scene to supplement the written documentation in preparation for scene reconstruction efforts and 

any future proceedings. 

3. Locate and Interview Victims 

and Witnesses 

Principle: The investigator will obtain victims’/witnesses’ identities, statements, and information concerning their 

injuries. 

Procedure: The investigator should: 

A. Identify and locate witnesses (e.g., victims who may have been 

transported, employees, first responders, delivery/service personnel, neighbors, passers-by) and prioritize interviews. 

B. Attempt to obtain all available identifying data regarding victims/ 

witnesses (e.g., full name, address, date of birth, work and home 

telephone numbers) prior to their departure from the scene. 

24 
C. Establish each witness’ relationship to or association with the 

scene and/or victims. 

D. Establish the basis of the witness’ knowledge: How does the 

witness have knowledge of the incident? 

E. Obtain statements from each witness. 

F. Document thoroughly victims’ injuries and correlate victims’ 

locations at the time of the incident with the seat(s) of the 

explosion(s). 

G. Interview the medical examiner/coroner and hospital emergency 

personnel regarding fatalities and injuries. 

Summary: The investigator must attempt to determine the locations 

of all victims and witnesses. Victim and witness statements and information about their injuries may be 

essential to establishing the nature of the device and 

the circumstances of the incident. 

25 
Note: At the time the scene is determined to involve a bombing or 

other crime, the investigator must address legal requirements for 

scene access, search, and evidence seizure. 

Section E. Processing Evidence at the Scene 

1. Assemble the Evidence 

Processing Team 

Principle: Effective organization and composition of the evidence 

processing team ensure the proper collection and preservation of evidence. 

Procedure: The size of the evidence processing team depends on 

the magnitude of the scene, but the investigator needs 

to ensure that the following roles and expertise are 

addressed: 

A. Bomb disposal technician. 

B. Evidence custodian. 

C. Forensic specialist. 

D. Logistics specialist. 

E. Medical examiner. 

F. Photographer (still, digital, video, etc.). 

G. Procurement specialist. 

H. Safety specialist (structural engineer, etc.). 

I. Searchers/collectors. 

J. Sketch artist. 

Summary: Attention to the organization and composition of the 

evidence processing team facilitates effective evidence 

collection and preservation. 

E 

27 
2. Organize Evidence Processing 

Principle: Good organization is essential to evidence collection and 

preservation. The investigator must continually evaluate 

the scene, adapt to changes as they occur, and brief the 

team. 

Procedure: Before deploying the team, the investigator should: 

A. Review and reevaluate: 

u The boundaries of the scene. 

u Safety concerns. 

u Command post and staging locations. 

u Evidence processing and storage locations. 

u Personnel and equipment requirements. 

u Legal and administrative considerations. 

B. Identify the search procedure for the scene. 

C. Ensure that transient physical evidence has been preserved and 

collected. 

D. Consider onsite explosives detection (e.g., trace explosives 

detection, use of canines, chemical tests) by qualified personnel. 

E. Brief the team and review assignments. 

Summary: Prior to evidence collection and throughout the process, 

the investigator will review the scene, adapt to changes, 

and brief the team. 

3. Control Contamination 

Principle: Preventing contamination protects the integrity of the 

scene and other search areas, the integrity of the evidence for forensic analyses, and the safety of personnel. 

28 
Procedure: The investigator should ensure that evidence processing 

personnel: 

A. Use clean protective outergarments and equipment as applicable 

for each scene. 

B. Consider obtaining control samples as applicable (e.g., evidence 

containers, swabs of equipment and personnel). 

C. Package collected evidence in a manner that prevents loss, 

degradation, or contamination. 

D. Package, store, and transport evidence from different scenes or 

searches in separate external containers. 

Summary: Proper collection, packaging, transportation, and storage 

will minimize contamination and ensure the integrity of 

the evidence. 

4. Identify, Collect, Preserve, Inventory, 

Package, and Transport Evidence 

Principle: The search focuses on the discovery of physical evidence 

that may establish that a crime was committed and link 

elements of the crime to possible suspects. 

Procedure: To maximize the recovery and evaluation of all types of 

physical evidence, the investigator should ensure: 

A. The preparation of an evidence recovery log (see the sample in 

appendix A) that documents information such as: 

u Item number. 

u Description. 

u Location found (grid number if used). 

u Collector’s name. 

u Markings (either directly on the item or indirectly on the 

package). 

29 
u Packaging method. 

u Miscellaneous comments. 

B. The identification of evidence by: 

u Assigning personnel to designated search areas. 

u Initiating scene-specific search pattern(s) and procedures, 

including examination of immobile structures for possible 

evidence. 

u Attempting to determine the method of bomb delivery. 

u Establishing the seat(s) of the explosion(s), if present. 

u Documenting blast effects (e.g., structural damage, bent signs, 

thermal effects, fragmentation). 

u Examining the crater, vehicles, structures, etc. 

u Documenting the location(s) of victims prior to and after the 

explosion. 

u Ensuring that victims are examined for bomb component 

fragments. Autopsies should include full-body x-rays. 

C. The collection of evidence, including: 

u Suspected bomb components and fragments, including those 

recovered from victims. 

u Suspected materials used in the construction and transportation of the explosive device(s) (e.g., tape, batteries, manuals, 

vehicles). 

u Crater material. 

u Residues and other trace evidence (using swabbing techniques). 

u Additional items of evidence (e.g., blood, hair, fiber, fingerprints, tire tracks, weapons, documents, tools). 

u Comparison samples of indigenous materials. 

D. That evidence is: 

u Photographed. 

u Packaged and preserved in containers. 

u Labeled (e.g., date, collector’s initials, item number, location). 

u Recorded in the evidence recovery log. 

u Secured in the designated storage location. 

30 
E. The labeling, transportation, and storage of evidence by: 

u Placing evidence from different locations or searches in 

separate external containers. 

u Labeling evidence for storage and shipment, including 

identification of hazards. 

u Arranging for transportation of the evidence. 

Summary: Identification, collection, preservation, and packaging of 

evidence must be conducted in a manner that protects the 

item, minimizes contamination, and maintains the chain 

of custody. These steps assist in establishing the elements of a possible crime and provide the basis for 

thorough, accurate, and objective investigation and 

prosecution processes. 

31 
Section F. Completing and Recording the Scene 

Investigation 

1. Ensure That All Investigative Steps 

Are Documented 

Principle: To ensure that the permanent record will be complete, 

the investigator should review all documentation before 

releasing the scene. 

Procedure: The investigator should verify that the following have 

been addressed: 

A. Documentation of major events and time lines related to the 

incident. 

B. Personnel access log (see the sample in appendix A). 

C. Activity log (see the sample in appendix A). 

D. Review of interviews and events. 

E. Narrative description of the scene (see the sample in appendix A). 

F. Photo and video logs (see the sample in appendix A). 

G. Diagrams, sketches, and evidence mapping. 

H. Evidence recovery log (see the sample in appendix A). 

Summary: By accounting for all investigative steps prior to leaving 

the scene, the investigator ensures an accurate and 

thorough representation of the scene for the permanent 

record. 

F 

33 
2. Ensure That Scene Processing 

Is Complete 

Principle: The scene may be released only upon conclusion of the 

onsite investigation and a thorough evidence collection 

process. 

Procedure: The investigator should perform a critical review of the 

scene investigation with all personnel, to include the 

following actions: 

A. Discuss with team members, including those not present at the 

scene, preliminary scene findings and critical issues that arose 

during the incident. 

B. Ensure that all identified evidence is in custody. 

C. Recover and inventory equipment. 

D. Decontaminate equipment and personnel. 

E. Photograph and/or videotape the final condition of the scene 

just before it is released. 

F. Address legal considerations. 

G. Discuss postscene issues (e.g., forensic testing, insurance 

inquiries, interview results, criminal histories). 

H. Communicate and document postscene responsibilities. 

Summary: The investigator will review the scene investigation to 

ensure that it is complete and that postscene issues are 

addressed. 

34 
3. Release the Scene 

Principle: The release of the scene must be documented. The 

investigator should ensure communication of known 

scene-related health and safety issues to a receiving 

authority at the time of release. 

Procedure: Upon releasing the scene, the investigator should: 

A. Address public health and safety issues by performing the 

following tasks: 

u Contacting public utilities. 

u Evaluating biological and chemical hazards. 

u Evaluating structural integrity issues. 

u Assessing environmental issues. 

B. Identify a receiving authority for the scene. 

C. Ensure disclosure of all known health and safety issues to 

a receiving authority. 

D. Document the time and date of release, to whom the scene 

is being released, and by whom. 

Summary: The investigator will ensure communication of known 

health and safety issues to a receiving authority upon 

releasing the scene and will document the release. 

4. Submit Reports to the Appropriate 

National Databases 

Principle: Detailed technical information regarding explosive 

devices is collected, integrated, and disseminated via 

national databases. These data help authorities identify 

the existence of serial bombers, the sophistication of 

explosive devices being used, and the need for uniform 

procedures and further development of equipment. 

35 
Procedure: The investigator or authorized agency’s administration 

should submit detailed reports to these databases: 

A. Arson and Explosives National Repository (Bureau of Alcohol, 

Tobacco and Firearms). 

B. Bomb Data Center (Federal Bureau of Investigation). 

C. Uniform Crime Reports, National Incident-Based Reporting 

System, and National Fire Incident Reporting System. 

Summary: The investigator contributes to the compilation of 

national databases that identify trends in explosions 

and other incidents involving explosives. 

36 
Appendix A. Sample Forms 

Following are sample forms that can be adapted for use as needed. 

A1. 

A2. 

A3. 

A4. 

A5. 

A6. 

A7. 

Access Control Log 

Activity Log 

Narrative Description 

Photographic Log 

Evidence Recovery Log 

Evidence Control/Chain of Custody 

Consent to Search 

37 
CONSENT TO SEARCH 

I, 

(Person giving consent) 

having been informed of my constitutional right not to have a search made of my premises 

without a search warrant and of my right to refuse to consent to such a search, do 

authorize Fire or Police Investigator, 

(Name of Investigator) 

or his designee, to conduct a complete search of my premises known as 

(Address of property) 

for the purpose of establishing the cause of the explosion which occurred at my premises 

on . 

(Date of explosion) 

I am aware that the search is being conducted to search for evidence of the cause of the 

explosion and I agree to allow the above-named investigator or his designee to take 

photographs/videotapes of the premises, to remove papers, letters, materials, or other 

property, knowing that they may be submitted for forensic examination and testing. 

I am aware that the above-named investigator or his designee will be on the premises for 

a period of time and I have no objection to their entering and remaining on the premises 

for a number of days. This written consent is being given by me voluntarily and without 

threats or promises of any kind. 

I know that I can refuse to give this consent to search and I am waiving that right signing 

this consent. 

Person Giving Consent 

Witness 

Witness 

38 
 

 

 

 

ACCESS CONTROL LOG 

Date: Starting Time: Platoon: OCA or Dispatch #: 

Type of Crime:

 Location of Crime: 

Name Position/Title Time In Time Out 

Remarks: 

Initiated By: Initiating Officer: Print Name/Call Sign Signature 

 Relieved By: Relieving Officer: Print Name/Call Sign Signature 

 Date/Time Relieved: Date/Time Completed: Date Time Date Time 

 Supervisor’s Signature: 

The completed form is to be turned over to the Investigating Detective. Page___ of ___ 

39 
G

ACTIVITY LOG 

(Continued) 

40 
ACTIVITY LOG (Continued) 

41 
42 
43 
44 
EVIDENCE CONTROL/CHAIN OF CUSTODY 

Please Furnish Complete Information 

Agency submitting evidence Date 

Laboratory # 

Delivered by Accepted by 

Suspect(s) Victim(s) 

Offense 

Agency case # 

Place and date of offense 

Date of hearing, grand jury, trial, or reason why expeditious handling is necessary 

Prev. exams this case 

Yes No 

Evid. located 

Room # 

Report to be directed to 

Copies to Evidence to be returned to 

Mailed Back 

Picked Up by Contributor 

Brief Facts covering case 

Description of evidence Exams requested 

(This space for blocking) 

45 
(Continued) 

46 
Appendix B. Further Reading 

Beveridge, A. Forensic Investigation of Explosions. London: Taylor & 

Francis Ltd., 1998. 

Conkling, J.A. Chemistry of Pyrotechnics and Explosives. New York: 

Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1985. 

Cook, M.A. The Science of High Explosives. Malabar, Florida: Robert E. 

Krieger Publishing Company, 1958, 1985. 

Cooper, P.W. Explosives Engineering. New York: Wiley-VCH, 1997. 

Cooper, P.W., and S.R. Kurowski. Introduction to the Technology of 

Explosives. New York: Wiley-VCH, 1997. 

Davis, T.L. The Chemistry of Powder and Explosives. Hollywood, 

California: Angriff Press, 1972. 

DeHaan, J.D. Kirk’s Fire Investigation. 4th ed. Indianapolis: Brady 

Publishing/Prentice Hall, 1997. 

Encyclopedia of Explosives and Related Items. Vols. 1–10. Dover, 

New Jersey: Picatinny Arsenal, U.S. Army Armament Research and 

Development Command, 1960–83. 

Kennedy, P.M., and J. Kennedy. Explosion Investigation and Analysis: 

Kennedy on Explosions. Chicago: Investigations Institute, 1990. 

The ISEE Blaster’s Handbook. 17th ed. Cleveland: International Society 

of Explosives Engineers, 1998. 

Kohler, J., and R. Meyer. Explosives. 4th, revised and extended ed. 

New York: Wiley-VCH, 1993. 

Military Explosives. U.S. Army and U.S. Air Force Technical Manual 

TM 9–1300–214. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army, 1967. 

47 
National Fire Protection Association. NFPA 921: Guide for Fire 

and Explosion Investigations. Quincy, Massachusetts: National Fire 

Protection Association. 

Urbanski, T. Chemistry and Technology of Explosives. Vols. 1–4. 

New York: Pergamon Press, 1983. 

Yinon, J., and S. Zitrin. Modern Methods and Applications in Analysis 

of Explosives. New York: Wiley-VCH, 1993. 

48 
Appendix C. List of Organizations 

During the review process, drafts of this document were sent to the 

following agencies and organizations for comment. While TWGBSI 

considered all comments and issues raised by these organizations, this 

Guide reflects only the positions of its authors. Mention of the reviewers 

is not intended to imply their endorsement. 

Accomack County (VA) Sheriff’s Office 

Alaska State Criminal Laboratory 

American Academy of Forensic Sciences 

American Bar Association 

American Correctional Association 

American Jail Association 

American Prosecutors Research Institute 

American Reinsurance Company 

American Society of Crime Laboratory 

Directors 

American Society of Law Enforcement Trainers 

Anchorage (AK) Police Department 

Arapahoe County (CO) Sheriff’s Office 

Armstrong Forensic Laboratory 

Association of Federal Defense Attorneys 

Bridgeport (MI) Forensic Laboratory 

Bristol (VA) Police Department 

Broward County (FL) Sheriff’s Office 

Brownsville (TX) Police Department 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms 

Cameron County (TX) Sheriff’s Office 

Campaign for Effective Crime Policy 

Chicago (IL) Fire Department 

Cincinnati (OH) Fire Division 

City of Donna (TX) Police Department 

City of Inver Grove Heights (MN) Fire Marshal 

Clark County (NV) Fire Department 

Cleveland State College Basic Police Academy 

Commission on Accreditation of Law 

Enforcement Agencies 

Conference of State Court Administrators 

Connecticut State Police Forensic Laboratory 

Conyers (GA) Police Department 

Council of State Governments 

Covington (TN) Fire Department 

Criminal Justice Institute 

Delaware State Fire Marshal’s Office 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

Edinburg (TX) Police Department 

Fairbanks (AK) Police Department 

Federal Bureau of Investigation 

Federal Law Enforcement Training Center, U.S. 

Department of the Treasury 

Florida Department of Law Enforcement 

Florida State Fire Marshal 

Georgia Bureau of Investigation 

Georgia Public Safety Training Center 

Town of Goshen (NY) Police Department 

Harlingen (TX) Police Department 

Hidalgo County (TX) Sheriff’s Office 

Illinois State Police 

Indiana State Police Laboratory 

Institute of Police Technology and Management 

International Association for Identification 

International Association of Bomb Technicians 

and Investigators 

International Association of Chiefs of Police 

International City/County Management 

Association 

Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation 

Laboratory 

49 
Jefferson Parish (LA) Fire Department 

Juneau (AK) Police Department 

Laredo (TX) Police Department 

Law Enforcement Training Institute 

Los Angeles (CA) Fire Department 

Maine State Police Crime Laboratory 

Massachusetts State Fire Marshal’s Office 

Massachusetts State Police Crime Laboratory 

McAllen (TX) Police Department 

Metro Nashville (TN) Police Department 

Michigan Department of State Police 

Mission (TX) Police Department 

National Association of Attorneys General 

National Association of Black Women Attorneys 

National Association of Counties 

National Association of Criminal Defense 

Lawyers 

National Association of Drug Court Professionals 

National Association of Police Organizations, Inc. 

National Association of Sentencing Commissions 

National Association of State Alcohol and Drug 

Abuse Directors 

National Association of Women Judges 

National Black Police Association 

National Center for State Courts 

National Conference of State Legislatures 

National Council on Crime and Delinquency 

National Crime Prevention Council 

National Criminal Justice Association 

National District Attorneys Association 

National Governors Association 

National Institute of Standards and Technology, 

Office of Law Enforcement Standards 

National Law Enforcement and Corrections 

Technology Centers 

National Law Enforcement Council 

National League of Cities 

National Legal Aid and Defender Association 

National Organization of Black Law Enforcement 

Executives 

National Sheriffs’Association 

New Hampshire State Police Forensic 

Laboratory 

New Jersey State Police 

New York State Office of Fire Prevention and 

Control 

Orange County (CA) Sheriff’s Department 

Pan American Police Department (Edinburg, TX) 

Peace Officer’s Standards and Training 

Pennsylvania State Police Laboratory 

Pharr (TX) Police Department 

Pinellas County (FL) Forensic Laboratory 

Police Executive Research Forum 

Police Foundation 

Port Authority of NY & NJ Police 

Rhode Island State Crime Laboratory 

St. Louis (MO) Metropolitan Police Department 

San Diego (CA) Police Department 

Sitka (AK) Police Department 

South Carolina Law Enforcement Division 

Suffolk County (NY) Crime Laboratory 

Tennessee Bureau of Investigation 

Tennessee Law Enforcement Training Academy 

Texas Rangers Department of Public Safety 

Tucson (AZ) Police Department 

U.S. Border Patrol 

U.S. Conference of Mayors 

Utah State Crime Scene Academy 

Webb County (TX) Sheriff’s Department 

Weslaco (TX) Police Department 

Willacy County (TX) Sheriff’s Office 

Wisconsin State Crime Laboratory 

50 
Appendix D. Investigative and Technical Resources Appendix D. Investigative and Technical Resources 

Depending on jurisdiction, an investigator’s initial points of contact 

should be his or her State or local fire marshal’s office and/or State 

police. Following is a list of resources that may be useful for further 

investigative or technical information and assistance. This list should 

not be considered all-inclusive. 

A current list of institutions that can provide training in explosion/ 

bombing scene investigation is available from the National Center for 

Forensic Science. 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and 

Firearms* 

Headquarters Enforcement 

Operations Center 

888–ATF–BOMB 

202–927–8050 

URL: http://www.atf.treas.gov 

Arson and Explosives National 

Repository 

800–461–8841 

202–927–4590 

Arson and Explosives Programs 

Division 

202–927–7930 

National Laboratory 

301–762–9800 

Chemical Transportation Emergency Center (CHEMTREC®) 

800–262–8200 

URL: http://www.chemtrec.org 

Environmental Protection 

Agency 

National Response Center 

800–424–8802 

URL: http://www.epa.gov 

Federal Bureau of Investigation* 

Bomb Data Center (preblast 

issues) 

202–324–2696 

URL: http://www.fbi.gov 

Explosives Unit (postblast issues) 

202–324–4341 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

U.S. Fire Administration 

202–447–1000 

URL: http://www.usfa.fema.gov 

Institute of Makers of Explosives 

202–429–9280 

URL: http://www.ime.org 

51 
International Association of 

Arson Investigators 

314–739–4224 

URL: http://www.fireinvestigators.org 

International Association 

of Bomb Technicians and 

Investigators 

941–353–6843 

URL: http://www.iabti.org 

International Society of 

Explosives Engineers 

440–349–4004 

URL: http://www.isee.org 

National Center for Forensic 

Science 

407–823–6469 

URL: http://www.ncfs.ucf.edu 

National Fire Protection 

Association 

617–770–3000 

URL: http://www.nfpa.org 

National Institute of Standards 

and Technology 

Building and Fire Research 

Laboratory 

301–975–6850 

URL: http://www.bfrl.nist.gov 

Royal Canadian Mounted Police* 

Canadian Bomb Data Center 

613–993–7880 

URL: http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/ 

U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard 

Investigation Board 

202–261–7600 

URL: http://www.chemsafety.gov 

U.S. Postal Inspection Service* 

Forensic/Technical Services 

Division 

703–406–7100 

URL: http://www.usps.gov/ 

websites/depart/inspect/ 

* These are sources for criminal investigative assistance. 

52