T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J ER M AI NE ALON ZO M I TC HELL , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 11- 17002 D . C. N o s . 3 : 1 1 - c v - 0 0 0 5 6 - ECR

3 : 0 4 - c r - 0 0 0 1 0 - ECR ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da E dw a r d C . R e e d, J r . , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d M a y15, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , G R A B E R , an d M . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. F eder al pri soner J erm ai ne A l on zo M i t chel l appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2255 m ot i on f orhabe a s r e l i e f

. W e ha ve j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n d w e a f f i rm. M i t c he l l c ont e nds tha thi s c ouns e l r e nde r e d i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t a nc e byf

a i l i ng 

# FI LED MA Y22 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 17002 2 t o stri ke a prospect i ve j uror for cause. T hi s c on t ent i on fa i l s bec ause M i t chel l has d e m o n s tr a te d n e ith e rd e f ic ie n t p e r f

o rm a n c e n o rp r e

ju d ic e . See Stri cklan d v. W as hi ngton , 46 6 U . S . 66 8, 68 7 (19 84 ). M i t c he l l a l s o c ont e nds tha thi s c ouns e l r e nde r e d i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t a nc e by f a i l i ng t o obj e c ttha thi s s e nt e nc e vi ol a t e d App re nd iv. N ew Je rs ey , 530 U . S . 466 (200 0). T hi s c l ai m fa i l s f or l ac k o f pre

j ud i ce un der Str i c kland , be c aus e the S up re m e C ou rthas hel d that“ coca i ne base ” und er21 U . S . C . § 8 41 encom pass es coca i ne i n i t s c hem i ca l l y bas i c f orm , no tj ust“ cr ac k cocai ne. ” See D eP i erre v. U ni ted Stat es , 13 1 S . C t . 22 25 , 22 37 (201 1). M i t c he l l f

urthe rc ont e nds tha tthe tr i a l j udge c om m i tt e d s truc tur a l e rr orby f a i l i ng t o e xc us e apr os pe c t i ve j ur orf ora c tua l bi a s . E ve n i f

thi s a r gum e ntw e r e not f or f e i t e d byM i t c he l l ’ s f

a i l ur e t o r a i s e i ti n hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2255 m ot i on, our c onc l us i on i n U

n ite d S ta te s v . Mitc h e ll , 56 8 F . 3d 11 47 , 11 52 -54 (9th C i r. 20 09 ), p r e c lu d e s r e c o n s id e r a tio n o f th e is s u e u n d e rth e la w o f th e c a s e d o c tr in e . See U ni ted Stat es v. Scri vner , 18 9 F . 3d 82 5, 82 7 (9th C i r. 19 99 ). M i t c he l l f

i na l l yc ont e nds tha tthe tr i a l c ourte rr e d bys e nt e nc i ng hi m f or pos s e s s i on of

“ c r a c k c oc a i ne ” w i thoutf i ndi ng be y ond ar e a s onabl e doubttha tthe c oc a i ne ba s e w a s a c tua l l y“ c r a c k c oc a i ne . ” E ve n i f thi s c l a i m w e r e notf

or f e i t e d by M i t c he l l ’ s f

a i l ur e t o r a i s e i ti n hi s s e c t i on 2255 m ot i on, the c l a i m f a i l s i n l i ghtof D eP i erre , 131 S . C t . a t2237. AF F I RME D.