alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6423

ROBERT S. MARKS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM C. DUNCIL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Joseph Robert Goodwin,

District Judge. (CA-95-304-3)

Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 10, 1996

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert S. Marks, Appellant Pro Se. Silas Bent Taylor, Deputy

Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his habeas petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of

1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause; to the extent that

a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Marks v. Duncil, No. CA-95-304-3 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 13, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1675 

To provide a set-aside of funds for the territories under the health profession 

opportunity grant program under section 2008 of the Social Security 

Act, to make the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands eligible 

for the grants, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2023 

Mrs. GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N (for herself, Ms. PLASKETT, Mr. MOYLAN, Mr. 

SABLAN, and Mrs. RADEWAGEN) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide a set-aside of funds for the territories under 

the health profession opportunity grant program under 

section 2008 of the Social Security Act, to make the 

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands eligible 

for the grants, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Territory Health Revi5 talization Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1675 IH

1 SEC. 2. SET-ASIDE FOR THE TERRITORIES. 

2 Section 2008(c)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 

3 U.S.C. 1397g(c)(1)) is amended by inserting ‘‘5 percent 

4 of which for each fiscal year shall be reserved for grants 

5 to States other than the 50 States and the District of Co6 lumbia’’ before the period. 

7 SEC. 3. ELIGIBILITY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE 

8 NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS. 

9 Section 2008(a)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 

10 U.S.C. 1397g(a)(4)) is amended by striking subparagraph 

11 (E). 

12 SEC. 4. GUARANTEE OF GRANTEES IN THE TERRITORIES. 

13 Section 2008(a)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 

14 U.S.C. 1397g(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the 

15 following: 

16 ‘‘(D) GUARANTEE OF GRANTEES IN THE

17 TERRITORIES.—The Secretary shall award at 

18 least 2 grants under this subsection to an eligi19 ble entity that is located in a territory, to the 

20 extent there are a sufficient number applica21 tions submitted by such an eligible entity that 

22 meet the requirements of subparagraph (B).’’. 

23 SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

24 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 

25 on October 1, 2023. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BAY BANK, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO.

vs. § CV-09-748-CG-B 

§

M/V ED ADLER f/k/a M/V LADY JULIE, §

her engines, tackle, furniture, §

appurtenances, etc., in rem, §

and M/V CAPT JOE TANGUAY, §

her engines, tackle, furniture, §

appurtenances, etc., in rem, EAGLE §

MARINE GROUP, LLC, CARL STEVEN §

BREWSTER and WALTER WILLIS, §

in personam, §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Order of this Court, the United States Marshal sold the M/V

ED ADLER f/k/a M/V LADY JULIE and the M/V CAPT JOE TANGUAY separately at judicial

sale on January 27, 2010, and Bay Bank purchased the M/V ED ADLER f/k/a M/V LADY

JULIE for the sum of ONE THOUSAND AND NO/100THS DOLLARS ($1,000.00), and

purchased the M/V CAPT JOE TANGUAY for the sum of ONE THOUSAND AND

NO/100THS DOLLARS ($1,000.00) which were the highest bids offered at said sales, and the

Court being satisfied that no timely written objection to either sale has been filed,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the sale of the M/V ED

ADLER f/k/a M/V LADY JULIE to Bay Bank should be and hereby is confirmed and that the

sale of the M/V CAPT JOE TANGUAY to Bay Bank should be and hereby is confirmed. 

The United States Marshal is directed to issue a bill of sale free and clear from all liens

Case 1:09-cv-00748-CG-B Document 28 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 2
2

and encumbrances, along with all other appropriate documentation to effect a proper legal

conveyance, to Bay Bank as the new owner of the M/V ED ADLER f/k/a M/V LADY JULIE,

her engines, machines, fittings, tackle and all other appurtenances thereto belonging. The United

States Marshal is also directed to issue a bill of sale free and clear from all liens and

encumbrances, along with all other appropriate documentation to effect a proper legal

conveyance, to Bay Bank as the new owner of the M/V CAPT JOE TANGUAY, her engines,

machines, fittings, tackle and all other appurtenances thereto belonging.

IT IS ORDERED that the M/V ED ADLER f/k/a M/V LADY JULIE and the M/V

CAPT JOE TANGUAY are hereby released from seizure, and that the court appointed, substitute

custodian, Seaside Services, Inc., deliver possession of said vessels to Bay Bank. 

DONE and ORDERED this 11th day of February, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00748-CG-B Document 28 Filed 02/11/10 Page 2 of 2
USGv6 Test Selection Tables 

IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC)

F2-Conformance: SLAAC-R1v1.2

Applicable Profile: NIST SP 500-267B Revision 1 USGv6 Profile – November 2020.

Test Specification Id: 

• [Core-Conf] IPv6 Ready Core Protocols Test Specification, [editor: IPv6 Ready Logo ]. 

Stateless Address Autoconfiguration Test Check List

Reference Test Specification 

Id Test Number Device Type

RFC 8106 Core-Conformance v6LC.2.2.24 Router Advertisement DNS (A)(B) Router 

RFC 8106 Core-Conformance v6LC.2.2.25 Processing Router Advertisement DNS

(A)(B)(C)(D)(E)(F) Host 

RFC 4862 Core-Conformance v6LC.3.2.1 Global Address Autoconfiguration and DAD (A)(B)(C) Host/Router 

RFC 4862 Core-Conformance v6LC.3.2.2 Address Lifetime Expiry Host 

RFC 4862 Core-Conformance v6LC.3.2.3 Multiple Prefixes and Network Renumbering Host 

RFC 4862 Core-Conformance v6LC.3.2.4 Prefix-Information Option Processing 

(A)(B)(C)(D)(E)(F)(G)(H)(I)(J) Host

RFC 4862 Core-Conformance v6LC.3.2.5 Prefix-Information Option Processing, Lifetime 

(A)(B)(C)(D) Host 

RFC 7217 Core-Conformance v6LC.3.2.6 Stable addresses (A)(B) Host

RFC 7217 Core-Conformance v6LC.3.2.7 Resolving DAD Conflicts (A)(B) Host 

References: 

• [RFC 4862] Thomson, S., T. Narten, T. Jinmei, IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration, RFC 4862, 

September 2007. 

• [RFC 7217] F. Gont, A Method for Generating Semantically Opaque Interface Identifiers with IPv6 

Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC), RFC 7217, April 2014.

• [RFC 8106] - J.Jeong, S. Park, L.Beloeil, and S.Mandadapalli, IPv6 Router Advertisement Options for 

DNS Configuration, RFC 8106, March 2017.

The objective of this test selection sheet is to provide a reference for available test specifications that identifies tests 

applicable to the USGv6 Profile.
ex_1014.htm


Exhibit 10.14


 




  





1











  






 


 




  





2











  






 


 




  





3











  






 


 




  





4











  






 


 




  





5











  






 


 




  





6











  






 


 




  





7











  






 


 



8
NIST Safety Commission

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Heritage Room, Administration Building 101, Gaithersburg, MD

Hybrid Meeting

January 4 – 5, 2023

9:00 AM – 5:00 PM ET

Meeting Agenda

Wednesday, January 4, 2023

Time Topics and Speakers

9:00 AM Call to Order, Roll Call, Opening Remarks

Mark Peters – Chair, NIST Safety Commission

9:10 AM

FACA Briefing

Jennifer Chung – Senior Counsel for Advisory Committees, Office of General 

Counsel, U.S. Department of Commerce

9:25 AM

Welcome and Charge to the Commission

Dr. Laurie Locascio – Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology 

and NIST Director

9:40 AM Discussion

9:50 AM

NIST Safety Management System

Dr. Elizabeth Mackey – Chief Safety Officer and Director of the Office of Safety, 

Health, and Environment

10:15 AM Discussion

10:25 AM Break

10:40 AM NIST Center for Neutron Research Safety Briefing

Dr. Robert Dimeo – Director, NIST Center for Neutron Research

11:05 AM Engineering Laboratory Safety Briefing

Dr. Joannie Chin – Director, Engineering Laboratory

11:30 AM Discussion

11:40 AM Lunch

12:30 PM Focus Group 1 – Discussion with Organizational Unit (OU) Directors

1:25 PM Focus Group 2 – Discussion with Division Chiefs

2:50 PM Break
3:05 PM Focus Group 3 – Discussion with Members of the Office of Safety, Health, and 

Environment

4:15 PM Working Session

4:45 PM Public Comment

5:00 PM Adjourn

Thursday, January 5, 2023

Time Topics and Speakers

9:00 AM Call to Order 

Chair, NIST Safety Commission

9:05 AM Focus Group 4 – Discussion with Members of the Office of Facilities and Property 

Management

10:05 AM Break

10:15 AM Focus Group 5 – Discussion with Long Tenure Scientists and Division Safety 

Representatives

11:30 AM Lunch

12:05 PM Travel to NFRL (bus pickup at the entrance near the Red Auditorium)

12:15 PM Tour of the National Fire Research Laboratory

12:40 PM Travel to NCNR

12:50 PM Tour of the NIST Center for Neutron Research

1:15 PM Travel to the NIST NanoFab

1:25 PM Tour of the NIST NanoFab

1:50 PM Travel to Administration Building 101

2:00 PM Break

2:10 PM Focus Group 6 – Discussion with Early and Mid-Career Scientists and NIST 

Associates

3:20 PM Focus Group 7 – Discussion with Technicians

4:20 PM Working Session 

5:00 PM Adjourn
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated May 21, 2015, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-202722) of Smart Trust, NASDAQ
International Dividend Achievers Index Trust, Series 5.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


May 21, 2015
10754.

#### Atkinson v. Sommer.

Decided March 11, 1920.

Trover; from Pulaski superior court—Judge Graham. June 21, 1919.

*H. G. Coates,*for plaintiff in error.

*H. F. Lawson,*contra.

Jenkins, P. J.

1. Considering the alleged newly discovered evidence set out in the only special ground of the motion for a new trial, in connection with the defendant’s own testimony, it is clearly apparent that by the exercise of proper diligence its existence would have been revealed ‘ to the defendant prior to the time of the trial; and it therefore furnishes no sufficient ground to set aside the verdict. *Rothschild*v. *Arenson,*22 *Ga. App.*337 (96 S. E. 14).

2. There being sufficient evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, his judgment overruling the motion for a new trial can not be disturbed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.*
11283.

#### Polhill *v.*The State.

Decided June 15, 1920.

Accusation of cheating and swindling; from city court of Nashville— Judge W. E. Smith. January 12, 1920.

*C. A. Christian, Story & Story,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. H. Gary, solicitor,*contra.

Luke, J.

1. The judgment overruling the demurrer in this case can not be considered, as no assignment of error upon the exception pendente lite, or upon the judgment overruling the demurrer, is contained in the final bill of exceptions, nor was error assigned thereon, *by*permission of this court, before the beginning of the argument here. A judgment upon the demurrer can not bo considered upon the motion for a new trial.

2. The motion for a new trial is based on the general grounds only, and this court can not say that the evidence did not authorize the verdict. Eor no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
Exhibit 10.1


 


 





Portions of this document have been redacted
pursuant to a Request for Confidential Treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Redacted portions are indicated with the notation “*”.




 


 


THIRD AMENDMENT


 


This Third Amendment, effective as of the
date set forth above the signatures of the parties below (the “Effective Date”), amends the Exclusive Patent License
Agreement dated April 15, 2011 (“LICENSE AGREEMENT”), by and between the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“M.I.T.”),
a Massachusetts corporation having its principal office at 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, and Enumeral
Biomedical Corp., a Delaware Corporation having its principal place of business at 200 CambridgePark Drive, Suite 2000, Cambridge,
MA 02140 (“COMPANY”), as amended by the First Amendment effective March 8, 2013 and by the Second Amendment effective
July 16, 2014. Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meaning given such terms in the LICENSE AGREEMENT.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
promises and mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree to modify the LICENSE AGREEMENT as follows:


 


		1.	Section 3.1(q) is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:



 


“(q) COMPANY or an AFFILIATE or
SUBLICENSEE shall initiate clinical studies in support of obtaining regulatory approval of a DIAGNOSTIC PRODUCT by or before *.”


 


2.     Section 3.1(r) is hereby deleted and
replaced with the following:


 


“(r) COMPANY or an AFFILIATE or
CORPORATE PARTNER of SUBLICENSEE shall make a first commercial sale of a DIAGNOSTIC PRODUCT by or before *.”


 


		3.	The remaining terms and conditions of the LICENSE AGREEMENT remain intact.



 


 


 



    	 



    	 



    




 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused
this Third Amendment to be executed under seal by their duly authorized representatives.


 


The Effective Date of this Third Amendment is April 15, 2015.


 


 





	MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF	 	ENUMERAL BIOMEDICAL CORP.
	TECHNOLOGY 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Lita L. Nelsen 	 	By:	/s/ Arthur H. Tinkelenberg, Ph. D.
	 	 	 		
	Name:	Lita L. Nelsen 	 	Name:	Arthur H. Tinkelenberg, Ph. D. 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:	Director, Technology Licensing Office	 	Title:	President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ALABAMA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.

) 05-0323-BH-C

ALABAMA PROFESSIONAL STAFF )

ORGANIZATION, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

The parties have now filed a joint motion (Doc. 39) to dismiss all claims and

counterclaims asserted in this action and have requested that the dismissal be with

prejudice as to all the parties, each party to bear its own costs. It is ORDERED that the

parties’ motion be and is hereby GRANTED and that, therefore, this action be and is

DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs. 

DONE this 1st day of March, 2006.

 s/ W. B. Hand 

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00323-BH-C Document 40 Filed 03/01/06 Page 1 of 1
10706.

#### BANKS *v.*THE STATE.

Decided April 13, 1920.

1. Where one who is being prosecuted for the offense of seduction makes a timely, bona fide, and continuing offer to marry the woman whom he is charged with having seduced, and obtains a marriage license from the ordinary of the county of her residence and gives the bond provided for in section 379 of the Renal Code of 1910, and his offer of marriage is refused by her, and the court thereupon enters a judgment ending the prosecution for seduction and discharging him, that judgment is a bar to any subsequent' prosecution of the defendant for the offense of fornication, founded upon the same transaction.

2. Under the foregoing ruling the court erred in striking the defendant’s special plea in bar, on the ground that it was insufficient in law; and the further proceedings on the trial were nugatory.

Conviction of fornication; from Appling superior court — Judge Highsmith. May 10,1919.

*W. W. Bennett,*for plaintiff in error.

*Alvin V. Sellers, solicitor-general,*contra.

Luke, J.

Certain questions of law involved in this case were certified to the Supreme Court, and the preceding headnotes embody the substance of that court’s answers. See the full opinion of* the Supreme Court, 150 *Ga.*73 (102 S. E. 519). The court having erroneously stricken the defendant’s special plea in bar, the further proceedings in the ease were nugatory, and a new trial is required. If the defendant on the next trial sustains by *170proof the material allegations of his plea in bar, he will be entitled to an acquittal.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd. at September 30, 1995, and its statement of
income for the nine months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Form 10-Q of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd. for the nine months ended
September 30, 1995.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,154,990
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  179,422
<ALLOWANCES>                                   168,773
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,174,862
<PP&E>                                      25,534,398
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,597,087
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,511,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          881,799
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,476,091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,511,397
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,444,689
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  498,577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,089,206
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,089,206
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,089,206
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             1103000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     30701000
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                       20423000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  55344000
<PP&E>                                            55513000
<DEPRECIATION>                                    38627000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    78193000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             20210000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         176000
<COMMON>                                           2583000
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      78193000
<SALES>                                          121037000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 121037000
<CGS>                                             63282000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     63282000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  438000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     609000
<INCOME-TAX>                                        350000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 259000
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        259000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .12
        



</TABLE>