Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 243 / Thursday, December 18, 2014 / Notices 75541 

transmission of such information. The 

information collected could include: 

• Who harvested or produced the fish 

(e.g. name and flag State of harvesting 

vessel and/or farm facility, type of 

fishing gear)? 

• What species was harvested (e.g. 

species name, form, and quantity of the 

product)? 

• Where and when was the seafood 

harvested and landed (e.g. ocean area of 

catch, farm location, date of harvest, 

date/point of first landing)? 

• Other relevant details, such as 

transshipment and/or processing 

activity. 

The process to develop types of 

information and operational standards 

under each of the categories above 

should allow for input from interested 

stakeholders including industry, nongovernmental organizations, supplychain experts, and state, local and 

foreign governments. It should also 

draw upon and utilize applicable 

experience, best practices, and existing 

standards where possible. This program 

should be developed in a way that 

permits all authorized agencies to enter, 

analyze, use, and verify the data while 

still protecting information consistent 

with statutory authorities. The types of 

information and operational standards 

should apply no less favorably as 

between domestic and imported 

products. Recommendation: Direct the 

Task Force, with input from U.S. 

industry and other stakeholders, to 

identify and develop within six months 

a list of the types of information and 

operational standards needed for an 

effective seafood traceability program to 

combat seafood fraud and IUU seafood 

in U.S. commerce. 

Question: Accounting for those listed 

above, what types of information and 

operational standards should be 

included in a traceability program? 

15. Following Recommendation #14, a 

program will be developed and 

implemented to establish these types of 

information and operational standards 

as pre-requisites for entry into 

commerce. The program will initially be 

applied to certain fish or seafood that 

are of particular concern because they 

are subject to significant seafood fraud 

or because they are at significant risk of 

being caught by IUU fishing. However, 

the goal would be to eventually expand 

the program to all seafood at first point 

of sale or import, after consideration of 

relevant factors such as input from 

stakeholders and cost-effectiveness. To 

achieve this: 

a. The Secretaries of Commerce, 

Health and Human Services, State, and 

any other relevant agencies will identify 

certain species of fish or seafood that are 

of particular concern because they are 

subject to significant seafood fraud or 

because they are at significant risk of 

being caught by IUU fishing. The 

Secretaries of Homeland Security, HHS, 

and Commerce, and other agencies, as 

appropriate, will work together to 

implement Recommendation #14 

requirements for the collection of 

relevant and necessary data from, and 

compliance with operational standards 

by, importers of these identified species, 

as consistent with existing authorities. 

b. The Secretaries of Commerce and 

Health and Human Services will then 

work with the Regional Fishery 

Management Councils, states, and other 

partners to require this same 

information from these identified 

species when they are domestically 

harvested or produced. 

c. Information collected will be 

shared among Federal administrative 

and law enforcement agencies for 

analysis and other relevant actions to 

prevent IUU or fraudulently labeled 

seafood from entering U.S. commerce 

pursuant to the strategy developed by 

the Secretaries of Agriculture, 

Commerce, Health and Human Services, 

Homeland Security, and the Interior, 

and the Attorney General 

(Recommendation #8). 

d. The Secretary of Homeland 

Security will collaborate with the 

Secretary of Commerce and other 

agencies as relevant to assist in 

developing a voluntary Commerce 

Trusted Trader Program for importers of 

these identified species. The Program 

will provide benefits such as reduced 

targeting and inspections and enhanced 

streamlined entry into the United States 

for certified importers. 

e. Implementation of this risk-based 

traceability program will be evaluated 

regularly, beginning within one year of 

requiring the types of information for atrisk species, to identify whether it is 

meeting the intended objectives in the 

most effective way possible, while 

considering costs and benefits. The Task 

Force will consider the next steps in 

expanding the program to other seafood 

entering U.S. commerce. This 

evaluation will include input from 

stakeholders and identify any additional 

resources or legal authorities that may 

be necessary to cover additional species 

and types of product, and to make the 

information available to the consumer. 

f. Within one year of requiring the 

types of information for at-risk species, 

the Task Force will develop further 

recommendations on how certain types 

of information within the traceability 

system (e.g. species; geographic origin; 

means of production, such as wildcaught versus aquaculture; and gear 

type) could be made available to the 

consumer. 

Recommendation: Direct the Task 

Force to establish, within 18 months, 

the first phase of a risk-based 

traceability program to track seafood 

from point of harvest to entry into the 

U.S. commerce. 

Questions for Recommendation #15: 

(a) Which species are currently at 

highest risk of IUU fishing and seafood 

fraud and what factors contribute to 

species becoming at high risk in the 

future? 

(b) What are the specific 

characteristics and workings of the 

global seafood supply chain that should 

be taken into account when requiring 

information? 

(c) What are the best approaches for 

expanding the risk-based program to 

incorporate other fish and seafood 

products entering into U.S. commerce? 

(d) How often should the risk-based 

program be evaluated? 

(e) What roles should government and 

private sectors serve in managing and 

evaluating the program? 

Reporting: Where a timeframe is not 

specifically noted under a 

recommendation, the relevant agencies 

will report to the Task Force on the 

progress of implementing that 

recommendation in one year from 

receiving guidance from the President. 

In addition, recognizing that a valuable 

and extensive body of information on 

fisheries and seafood products would be 

created by the recommendations above, 

the Task Force will report annually to 

the President, via the National Ocean 

Council, on seafood trends, key issues 

related to IUU fishing and seafood 

fraud, and progress on development and 

implementation of a comprehensive and 

risk-based traceability program. 

Dated: December 15, 2014. 

Samuel D. Rauch III, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator for 

Regulatory Programs, National Marine 

Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29628 Filed 12–16–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army 

[Docket ID USA–2014–0047] 

Privacy Act of 1974; System of 

Records 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice to alter a System of 

Records. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

75542 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 243 / Thursday, December 18, 2014 / Notices 

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army 

proposes to alter a system of records 

notice, A0195–6 USACIDC, entitled 

‘‘Criminal Investigation Accreditation 

and Polygraph Examiner Evaluation 

Files’’ in its existing inventory of 

records systems subject to the Privacy 

Act of 1974, as amended. This system 

will be used to determine applicant’s 

acceptance into or rejection from the 

USACIDC program; continuing 

eligibility, placement or standing 

therein; and to manage and evaluate 

polygraph examination performance. 

DATES: Comments will be accepted on or 

before January 20, 2015. This proposed 

action will be effective the date 

following the end of the comment 

period unless comments are received 

which result in a contrary 

determination. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by docket number and title, 

by any of the following methods: 

* Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

* Mail: Federal Docket Management 

System Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive 

East Tower, 2nd Floor, Suite 02G09, 

Alexandria, VA 22350–3100. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name and 

docket number for this Federal Register 

document. The general policy for 

comments and other submissions from 

members of the public is to make these 

submissions available for public 

viewing on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov as they are 

received without change, including any 

personal identifiers or contact 

information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Leroy Jones, Jr., Department of the 

Army, Privacy Office, U.S. Army 

Records Management and 

Declassification Agency, 7701 Telegraph 

Road, Casey Building, Suite 144, 

Alexandria, VA 22325–3905 or by 

calling (703) 428–6185. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Department of the Army’s notices for 

systems of records subject to the Privacy 

Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, 

have been published in the Federal 

Register and are available from the 

address in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT or from the Defense Privacy 

and Civil Liberties Division Web site at 

http://dpcld.defense.gov/. 

The proposed systems reports, as 

required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(r) of the 

Privacy Act, as amended were 

submitted on December 9, 2014, to the 

House Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform, the Senate 

Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs, and the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

pursuant to paragraph 4c of Appendix I 

to OMB Circular No. A–130, ‘‘Federal 

Agency Responsibilities for Maintaining 

Records About Individuals,’’ dated 

February 8, 1996 (February 20, 1996, 61 

FR 6427). 

Dated: December 12, 2014. 

Aaron Siegel, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

A0195–6 USACIDC 

SYSTEM NAME: 

Criminal Investigation Accreditation 

and Polygraph Examiner Evaluation 

Files (February 7, 2001, 66 FR 9298) 

CHANGES: 

* * * * * 

SYSTEM LOCATION: 

Delete entry and replace with 

‘‘Headquarters, U.S. Army Criminal 

Investigation Command (USACIDC), 

Russell Knox Building, 27130 Telegraph 

Road, Quantico, Virginia 22134–2253. 

Information concerning polygraph 

examiners is located at the Director, 

U.S. Army Crime Records Center, U.S. 

Army Criminal Investigation Command, 

ATTN: CICR–FP, Russell Knox 

Building, 27130 Telegraph Road, 

Quantico, Virginia 22134–2253, and 

subsequently at the Washington 

National Records Center, GSA, 4205 

Suitland Road, Suitland, Maryland 

20746–8001.’’ 

* * * * * 

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

Delete entry and replace with 

‘‘Individual’s application, name, date of 

birth, current address, and telephone 

number, agent sequence number, DOD 

ID number, badge/credential number, 

statement of personal history, personal 

identifiers, photographs, fingerprint 

cards, qualifications record, biography, 

information pertaining to assignment 

capability or limitation, letters of 

recommendation, educational 

institutional documents, character 

investigation data, reclassification 

actions, reassignment orders, 

commander’s inquiry data, reports of 

investigation, reasons for withdrawal 

from program, reason for denying 

application, date of acceptance into 

program, date appointed, date of 

accreditation, badge number, credential 

number, polygraph certificate number, 

agent sequence number, assignment, 

date assigned, marital status, and other 

data pertinent to the accreditation 

function, physical profile, date of last 

physical, assignment preference, 

transfer restrictions, job title, security 

clearance data, date of last background 

investigation, foreign language 

proficiency, special qualifications, 

service agreement, spouse’s place of 

birth and citizenship, agent’s place of 

birth, private licenses, hobbies, and last 

10 assignments. Polygraph examiner 

performance and evaluation data 

maintained at the Crime Records Center 

(CRC) include individual’s full name, 

personal history statement, certificate 

number, polygraph examination history, 

year of polygraph report, report of 

investigation or CRC cross reference 

number, type of examination, and 

monitor’s comments.’’ 

AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM: 

Delete entry and replace with ‘‘10 

U.S.C. 3013, Secretary of the Army; 

Army Regulation 195–6, Department of 

the Army Polygraph Activities.’’ 

* * * * * 

RETRIEVABILITY: 

Delete entry and replace with ‘‘By 

individual’s name, agent sequence 

number, DoD ID number, badge/

credential number.’’ 

SAFEGUARDS: 

Delete entry and replace with ‘‘All 

records are maintained in buildings 

protected by security guards or a locked 

wire enclosure; information is accessed 

only by designated individuals having 

official need therefore in the 

performance of assigned duties. DoD 

Components and approved users ensure 

that electronic records collected and 

used are maintained in controlled areas 

accessible only to authorized personnel. 

Physical security differs from site to 

site, but the automated records are 

maintained in controlled areas 

accessible only by authorized personnel. 

Access to computerized data is 

restricted by use of common access 

cards (CACs) and is accessible only by 

users with an authorized account. The 

system and electronic backups are 

maintained in controlled facilities that 

employ physical restrictions and 

safeguards such as security guards, 

identification badges, key cards, and 

locks.’’ 

* * * * * 

SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS: 

Delete entry and replace with 

‘‘Commander, Headquarters, U.S. Army 

Criminal Investigation Command, 

Russell Knox Building, 27130 Telegraph 

Road, Quantico, Virginia 22134–2253.’’ 

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE: 

Delete entry and replace with 

‘‘Individuals seeking to determine 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 243 / Thursday, December 18, 2014 / Notices 75543 

whether information about themselves 

is contained in this system should 

address written inquiries to the Director, 

U.S. Army Crime Records Center, U.S. 

Army Criminal Investigation Command, 

ATTN: CICR–FP, Russell Knox 

Building, 27130 Telegraph Road, 

Quantico, Virginia 22134–2253. 

For verification purposes, individual 

should provide the full name, Social 

Security Number (SSN), date and place 

of birth, current address, telephone 

numbers, date of application to the 

program, sufficient details to locate the 

record, and signature. 

In addition, the requester must 

provide a notarized statement or an 

unsworn declaration made in 

accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1746, in the 

following format: 

If executed outside the United States: 

‘I declare (or certify, verify, or state) 

under penalty of perjury under the laws 

of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. Executed 

on (date). (Signature).’ 

If executed within the United States, 

its territories, possessions, or 

commonwealths: ‘I declare (or certify, 

verify, or state) under penalty of perjury 

that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on (date). (Signature).’ ’’ 

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: 

Delete entry and replace with 

‘‘Individuals seeking access to 

information about themselves contained 

in this system should address written 

inquiries to the Director, U.S. Army 

Crime Records Center, U.S. Army 

Criminal Investigation Command, 

ATTN: CICR–FP, Russell Knox 

Building, 27130 Telegraph Road, 

Quantico, Virginia 22134–2253. 

For verification purposes, individual 

should provide the full name, SSN, date 

and place of birth, current address, 

telephone numbers, date of application 

to the program, sufficient details to 

locate the record, and signature. 

In addition, the requester must 

provide a notarized statement or an 

unsworn declaration made in 

accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1746, in the 

following format: 

If executed outside the United States: 

‘I declare (or certify, verify, or state) 

under penalty of perjury under the laws 

of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. Executed 

on (date). (Signature).’ 

If executed within the United States, 

its territories, possessions, or 

commonwealths: ‘I declare (or certify, 

verify, or state) under penalty of perjury 

that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on (date). (Signature).’ ’’ 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–29595 Filed 12–17–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. CD15–5–000] 

Imperial Irrigation District; Notice of 

Preliminary Determination of a 

Qualifying Conduit Hydropower 

Facility and Soliciting Comments and 

Motions to Intervene 

On November 26, 2014, the Imperial 

Irrigation District filed a notice of intent 

to construct a qualifying conduit 

hydropower facility, pursuant to section 

30 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), as 

amended by section 4 of the 

Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act 

of 2013 (HREA). The proposed 

Rockwood Heading on Central Main 

Canal In-Conduit Hydroelectric Project 

would have an installed capacity of 170 

kilowatts (kW) and would be located on 

the existing Central Main Canal. This 

conduit transports water for irrigation, 

municipal, and industrial purposes. The 

project would be located near the city of 

Brawley in Imperial County, California. 

Applicant Contact: Carl Stills, 1651 

West Main Street, El Centro, CA 92243, 

Phone No. (760) 339–9701. 

FERC Contact: Robert Bell, Phone No. 

(202) 502–6062, email: robert.bell@

ferc.gov. 

Qualifying Conduit Hydropower 

Facility Description: The proposed 

project would consist of: (1) One 

proposed 23.7-foot-long, 14.5-foot-wide 

concrete box intake structure with a 10- 

foot-wide gate; (2) a proposed 15-by-20- 

foot powerhouse containing a turbine 

generator unit with an installed capacity 

of 170 kW; (3) the proposed 35-footlong, 14.5-foot-wide concrete box 

tailrace structure which returns the 

water into the Central Main Canal; and 

(4) appurtenant facilities. The proposed 

project would have an estimated annual 

generating capacity of 941 megawatthours. 

A qualifying conduit hydropower 

facility is one that is determined or 

deemed to meet all of the criteria shown 

in the table below. 

TABLE 1—CRITERIA FOR QUALIFYING CONDUIT HYDROPOWER FACILITY

Statutory provision Description Satisfies 

(Y/N) 

FPA 30(a)(3)(A), as amended by HREA ... The conduit the facility uses is a tunnel, canal, pipeline, aqueduct, flume, ditch, or 

similar manmade water conveyance that is operated for the distribution of water for 

agricultural, municipal, or industrial consumption and not primarily for the generation of electricity.

Y 

FPA 30(a)(3)(C)(i), as amended by HREA The facility is constructed, operated, or maintained for the generation of electric 

power and uses for such generation only the hydroelectric potential of a non-federally owned conduit.

Y 

FPA 30(a)(3)(C)(ii), as amended by HREA The facility has an installed capacity that does not exceed 5 megawatts ..................... Y 

FPA 30(a)(3)(C)(iii), as amended by 

HREA.

On or before August 9, 2013, the facility is not licensed, or exempted from the licensing requirements of Part I of the FPA.Y 

Preliminary Determination: Based 

upon the above criteria, Commission 

staff preliminarily determines that the 

proposal satisfies the requirements for a 

qualifying conduit hydropower facility, 

which is not required to be licensed or 

exempted from licensing. 

Comments and Motions to Intervene: 

Deadline for filing comments contesting 

whether the facility meets the qualifying 

criteria is 45 days from the issuance 

date of this notice. 

Deadline for filing motions to 

intervene is 30 days from the issuance 

date of this notice. 

Anyone may submit comments or a 

motion to intervene in accordance with 

the requirements of Rules of Practice 

and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210 and 

385.214. Any motions to intervene must 

be received on or before the specified 

deadline date for the particular 

proceeding. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES