alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VCAT – October 2015 | 1

NIST Centers of Excellence 

Program
VCAT – October 2015 | 2

Centers of Excellence Program Purpose and Overview

The NIST Centers of Excellence expand NIST’s impact and mission 

delivery by enabling NIST to partner with foremost experts in 

critical technical areas

• Enable collaborations between NIST and leading research institutions in 

emerging technology areas to help NIST meet mission needs in new or 

expanding areas of strategic focus

• Enhance technical innovation through early alignment of measurement 

science with emerging fields of research

• Provide new opportunities for training of students and postdocs in 

measurement science

• Provide greater opportunities for NIST to engage with entrepreneurs and with 

industry
VCAT – October 2015 | 3

Current Centers of Excellence

• CHiMaD - Center for 

Hierarchical Materials and 

Design (January 2014)

• Center for Risk-Based 

Community Resilience Planning 

(February 2015)

• csafe - Center for Statistics and 

Applications in Forensic 

Evidence (May 2015)
VCAT – October 2015 | 4

Future Plans for CoE Partnership Model

• Currently no new funding available for additional Centers

• Original Plans called for a total of 5 Centers in operation

• If new funding becomes available examples of strategically important 

areas for NIST under consideration for future competitions include:

– Complex Systems – capabilities for measuring, predicting, and 

managing emergent behavior 

– Measurement and Control of Biological Systems –developing novel 

measurement capabilities for systems biology and biomanufacturing 

– Advances in Photonic and Optical Measurements - enabling realtime, non-destructive, in-situ sensing and characterization
VCAT – October 2015 | 5

Plans for Review of the CoE Program

• CoEs will be evaluated at year 5 to determine whether to 

extend the award or move in a new direction

• Robust process needed to evaluate quality, effectiveness, and 

value of partnership to determine continued investment

• Formal technical and operational reviews and site visits by 

NIST and external panels

– Performance during initial award period

– Quality of proposed plan for future period

– Alignment with NIST programmatic priorities

– Effectiveness of collaboration
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-20-0000384

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

CRANDALL PENAFLOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v.

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT

(CASE NO. 2PR181000006(2) (CR. NO. 2PC900000146(4))

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION

(By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and Nakasone, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears we lack appellate

jurisdiction over self-represented Petitioner-Appellant Crandall

Penaflor's (Penaflor) appeal from the Circuit Court of the Second

Circuit's (circuit court) April 27, 2020 Order Denying

[Penaflor's] Motion for Reconsideration, entered in

No. 2PR181000006. 

On February 22, 2021, we issued an order for temporary

remand, under Waikiki v. Hoomaka Village Ass'n of Apartment

Owners, 140 Hawai#i 197, 204, 398 P.3d 786, 793 (2017), on the

ground that the circuit court had not entered a final, appealable

order or judgment. On remand, the circuit court indicated that

it did not intend to resolve all claims in Penaflor's petition

for post-conviction relief under Hawai#i Rules of Penal Procedure

Rule 40, and the claims remain unresolved. Thus, we lack

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-20-0000384

13-APR-2021

09:54 AM

Dkt. 54 ODSLJ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

appellate jurisdiction and must dismiss the appeal. See State v.

Johnston, 63 Haw. 9, 10, 619 P.2d 1076, 1077 (1980).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 13, 2021.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Presiding Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone

Associate Judge

2
##### 



EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
      Employment of Executive; Position and Duties
 Effective Date; Term of Employment
 Executives Compensation




---



##### 



Annual Base Salary
 Annual Bonus
 Fringe Benefits and Expense Reimbursement
 Long-Term Compensation
 Confidentiality
 2




---



##### 



Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation
  3




---



##### 



Severability
 Injunctive Relief
 Termination of Employment
 Resignation
 4




---



##### 



Termination for Cause
 Termination of Employment With Good Reason or Without Cause
  5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



7




---



##### 



Death
 Disability.
 Return of Company Property
 8




---



##### 



No Duty to Mitigate
 Cooperation
 Indemnification
   9




---



##### 



Legal Fees
 Other Agreements
 Notices
  
 10




---



##### 



Withholding
 Modification and Waiver
 Construction of Agreement
 Successors and Assigns
 11




---



##### 



Choice of Law and Forum
 Headings
 Execution in Counterparts
  MYLAN LABORATORIES INC.By
    
    /s/ Rod PiattName: Rod PiattTitle: Chairman, Compensation Committee/s/ Robert J. CouryRobert J. Coury
 12
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 243 (Thursday, December 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 75553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29666]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[PSHSB DA 14-1497]


The Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Seeks Comment on 
the Dismissal of Certain Proceedings as Dormant

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this document, the Public Safety and Homeland Security 
Bureau (PSHSB) seeks comment on whether certain long-pending petitions 
and requests identified in the Public Notice should be dismissed as 
dormant. PSHSB seeks to determine whether the long-term pending filings 
listed in the Attachment are candidates for dismissal because the items 
either have been abandoned, are no longer of interest to the filing 
party, or for which no further action is required or contemplated.

DATES: Comments are due thirty days after publication of this notice in 
the Federal Register. Reply comments are due forty-five days after 
publication of this notice in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file comments and reply comments on 
or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. 
Comments may be filed using: (1) The Commission's Electronic Comment 
Filing System (ECFS); or (2) by filing paper copies. All filings should 
reference the docket number of this proceeding, PS Docket No. 14-1497.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Ward of the Public Safety and 
Homeland Security Bureau, at (202) 418-2336, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e0a0f18070a40190f1c0a2e080d0d40090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ec888d9a8588c29b8d9e88ac8a8f8fc28b839a">[email protected]</span></a>.

Federal Communications Commission.
David Simpson,
Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2014-29666 Filed 12-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 31.01**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Thomas G. Brooker, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Nashua Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) [Not Applicable];  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: March 26, 2007 /s/ Thomas G. Brooker   Thomas G. Brooker   President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit99.2**

 

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Sandra G. Sciutto, being the Chief FinancialOfficer of California Coastal Communities, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifypursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002that, to the best of my knowledge as of the date set forth below (i) theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003which accompanies this certification (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Dated:  May  7, 2003 | */s/**Sandra G.  Sciutto* |
|---------------------------|---------------------------|
|                      | Sandra G. Sciutto         |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

----
#### Chambers Bros. & Co. *v.*Geo. W. Lubke, Assignor.

Principle and Surety — Ratification.

Where an agent sold whisky at a price less than that fixed by his principals, in violation of his authority, but the principals wrote the agent stating that they believed that he did the best he could in the sale, and directed him to take up their acceptance for $970.45 and to draw on them at thirty days for the balance of the account, it amounted to an appropriation of the money arising from the sale, and was a ratification of the act of the agent.

APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

December 5, 1873.

*GazlayReincke, for appellants.*

*Bodley & Sirnrdl, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

The sale of whisky was for prices below the maximum fixed by appellants, and was in violation of the authority given to Morse; but after it was made, and an account thereof rendered to appellants, they, in their letter of the 16th of November, 1870, addressed to Morse, express the opinion that he did the best he could with the whisky, and directed him in that letter to take up their acceptance for 970.45, to mature in St. Louis, and to draw on them at 30 days for the balance of account, or in other words, for the difference between the price realized for the whisky and the amount of their acceptance for $970.45.

This was an appropriation of the money arising from the sale, and a complete ratification of the acts of Morse in the transaction.

Certainly, if even sfter this ratification, appellants had discovered that Morse had committed a fraud, and had actually received more for appellants’ property than he accounted for, or by fraud or through negligence sold the goods below their market value, he might have been held liable therefor. But the evidence fails to establish fraud or culpable negligence on Morse.

The judgment must be affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                             ----------------------
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Black Warrior Wireline Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I William L.
Jenkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ William L. Jenkins
-----------------------
William L. Jenkins
Chief Executive Officer



August 15, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28853]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meetings will be held Thursday, January 15, 2015 and Friday, 
January 16, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(954) 423-7977.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be held Thursday, January 15, 2015, 
from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Friday, January 16, 2015, from 8:00 
a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral 
comments or submit written statements for consideration. Notification 
of intent to participate must be made with Ms. Powers. For more 
information please contact Ms. Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or (954) 423-
7977 or write: TAP Office, 1000 S. Pine Island Road, Plantation, FL 
33324 or contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The committee will be discussing various issues related to Tax 
Forms and Publications and public input is welcomed.

    Dated: December 3, 2014.
Otis Simpson,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2014-28853 Filed 12-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

As required by Section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of Veterans Affairs hereby gives notice of the establishment of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) MyVA Advisory Committee. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs has determined that establishing the Committee is both necessary and in the public interest.

The Committee will advise the Secretary and the Executive Director, MyVA Task Force on matters affecting the MyVA initiative and VA's ability to:
    - Rebuild Trust with Veterans and other Stakeholders
    - Improve Service Delivery, Focusing on Veteran Outcomes
    - Set the Course for Longer-term Excellence and Reform

The Secretary has determined that these functions cannot be performed by VA, an existing committee, or other through other means.

Committee members will be appointed by the Secretary's authorized designee and will be drawn from various venues and organization types such as Veteran-focused organizations, health sciences and academic communities, organizational leadership and change management groups, State/Local/Tribal Governments, health care administrators and leaders of key stakeholder associations and organizations. Additionally, two individuals will be recommended as ex-officio members.

                    Any member of the public seeking additional information should contact Sharon Stevens (40A1), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, District of Columbia, or email at                     *Sharon.Stevens@va.gov;*                     or via phone at (202) 461-6013.                

Dated: December 12, 2014.

Rebecca Schiller,

Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2014-29551 Filed 12-16-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8310-01-P
**Exhibit
31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURUSANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT**
 
 I, Bruce
L. Hollander, the President and CEO, certify that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this 1st quarter report on Form 10-QSB of Bio-Lok
      International Inc.;
 
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, nor misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this annual report;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects
      the financial condition, results of operations and cash flow of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
      report;
 
 4.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for the
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a- 14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
      have:
 
 a)
    designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
      prepared;
 
 b)
    evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 
 c)
    disclosed
      in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual
      report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and
 
 5.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit
      committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the
      equivalent functions):
 
 a)
    all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
      which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b)
    any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
      over financial reporting.
  
 Date: March 15,
2005
    
    /s/ **Bruce L.
      Hollander , President & CEO**Signature
      and Title
#### Jeff. Brown *v.*E. J. Young's Adm'r.

Appeal — Record—Affirmance.

Where the record on appeal does not contain an amended reply, the instructions, nor a deposition alleged to have been improperly -read -to the jury, and from the evidence before the court it can not ■be said that the findings of the jury are not in accordance with the preponderance of the evidence, the judgment will -be affirmed.

*738APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.

June 18, 1874.

*Jeff Brown, for appellant.*

*Barret, Roberts & Bogle, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge LindsXy:

The amended reply which appellant complains he was not allowed to file, is not made a matter of record by bill of exceptions or otherwise. Neither are the instructions given, or refused, incorporated into the record. The deposition of Lawrence Young, which appellant insists was improperly read to the jury, is wholly omitted.

The testimony as taken down and written out by the shorthand reporter, is not identified. It is attested by the judge, but there is no caption showing the court, or the trial at which the testimony was given. Besides all this, when every word of testimony, properly or improperly before us, is considered, we can not say that the finding of the jury is not in accordance with the preponderance thereof.

Judgment affirmed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 01, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 01, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21D0328. JERMEKIA J. MCCOY v. LESLIE W. MCCOY. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 20CV001266