alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XVIII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB  for
the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XVIII, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XVIII,  Inc.,  each  certify, pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XVIII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 9, 2006



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XVIII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 9, 2006
#### Sarah Crawford *v.*W. M. Combs.

Husband and Wife — Attachment—Sufficiency of Petition.

In an attachment suit against the husband a wife may enter her appearance and make defense in the name of her husband for the benefit of herself and minor children.

*201Sufficiency of Petition.

A petition on an account states no cause of action which declares that the defendant is indebted to plaintiff blank dollars, evidenced by an account filed amounting to blank dollars, and prays judgment for blank dollars.

APPEAL PROM POWELL CIRCUIT COURT.

October 31, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The wife was properly allowed to enter her appearance and make defense in the name of her husband, and for the benefit of herself and her infant children. She controverted the appellee’s right to the attachment, and asked that it should be discharged. The court erred in refusing her prayer in this regard.

As to the account sued on, appellee presents no cause of action. He says that Crawford is indebted to him blank dollars and cents, for groceries, whiskey, etc., evidenced by' an account filed, amounting to blank dollars and cents, and that he ought to recover blank dollars and cents, and prays judgment for said amount. If the petition had been confessed appellee could have recovered nothing. Such a petition will not sustain an attachment.

As to appellee’s liability as surety on Crawford’s bond as master commissioner, he merely claims that he is in danger of being ultimately compelled to pay $151. He does not aver that he has ever paid one cent. If it be a fact that he is liable, his claim against Crawford is in the nature of a debt not yet due. He has the right by attachment to secure himself, but the attachment could not be issued by the clerk until it was first granted, by the circuit court, or the judge thereof, or by the judge of the county court. The attachment in this case was issued by the clerk without having been granted in the manner indicated. It is therefore unauthorized and void.

The judgment sustaining it is *reversed*and the cause remanded with instruction to set aside said judgment, and to discharge the order of attachment. As the property was taken from the possession of the wife, the court should turn over the proceeds to her. Appellee may proceed with his action in other regards, and may sue out a new attachment, if grounds therefor are now in existence.

The question as to whether the wife can hold the attached prop*202erty or its proceeds when properly proceeded against need not be decided.

*J. B. White, for appellant.*
Back to Contents

Exhibit 31.1

**Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)**

I, William L. Jenkins, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Black Warrior Wireline Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

| Date:  September 2, 2004 | /s/      William L. Jenkins          William L. Jenkins          President and Chief Executive Officer |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

      

10
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL GARMENT COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 79-1570.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 1980.

Decided Feb. 20, 1980.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing April 14,1980.

Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, Marjorie S. Gofreed, Atty., John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Alan L. Rolnick, Atlanta, Ga., and Chris Mitchell, Birmingham, Ala., for respondent.

Before GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge, HEANEY and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board petitions this Court for enforcement of its order issued against the respondent National Garment Company.

After a careful examination of the record, we are convinced that substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the Board’s finding that respondent violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1), by:

> *624(1) Interrogating its employees concerning protected activities, including their interest in and support for their union.

> (2) Soliciting employees to engage in surveillance of the union meetings of respondent’s employees.

We are also convinced that the National Garment Company violated Section 8(a)(3) of the Act by discharging John Blackwell because of his union activities.

We do not believe that substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the Board’s finding that the respondent:

> (1) Conferred benefits upon its employees by repairing an air conditioner and installing a new air conditioner at the Fayette facility to influence the employees’ selection of a bargaining representative.

> (2) Conferred benefits upon its employees by increasing their' holiday pay to influence their selection of a bargaining representative.

We, therefore, enforce the Board’s order except as it relates to the charges regarding the air conditioning system and holiday pay.

Enforced as modified. Costs to be taxed to respondent.
EXHIBIT 3.4


                             STATE OF DELAWARE
          CERTIFICATE OF AMENDEMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                       OF THE INTERGROUP CORPORATION

    THE INTERGROUP CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing under and
by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
Company"), does hereby certify:

     FIRST: That pursuant to unanimous written consent of the Board of
Directors of the Company, resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a
proposed amendment of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, as amended
(the "Certificate of Incorporation"), declaring said amendment to be advisable
and providing that the amendment be presented to the stockholders for
consideration and action by written consent. The resolution setting forth the
proposed amendment is as follows:

     RESOLVED, that the Company's Certificate of Incorporation be amended
     by changing Article "FOURTH" thereof so that, as amended, said
     Article shall be and read as follows:

                               FOURTH

         "The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation
         shall have the authority to issue is Four Million One
         Hundred Thousand (4,100,000) shares, of which Four Million
         (4,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, $0.01 par value
         per share, and One Hundred Thousand (100,000) shares shall
         be Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share.

         The Board of Directors shall have authority to fix from time
         to time by resolution or resolutions the designations, voting
         powers, preferences and relative, participating, optional or
         other special rights, and the qualifications, limitations and
         restrictions thereof, in respect of the number of shares of
         any series of Preferred Stock.  Subject to the protective
         conditions and restrictions of any outstanding Preferred
         Stock, any amendment to this Certificate of Incorporation
         which increases or decreases the authorized capital stock of
         any class or classes may be adopted by the affirmative vote
         of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
         the voting stock of the Corporation."

     SECOND: That thereafter, in accordance with Section 228 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the necessary number of shares as
required by the statute were voted in favor of the amendment by written
shareholder consent.

     THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE INTERGROUP CORPORATION has duly caused this
certificate to be signed this 3rd day of August, 2007.

                                           THE INTERGROUP CORPORATION

                                        By: /s/ John V. Winfield
                                            --------------------------
                                           John V. Winfield
                                           President and Chairman of the Board
#### Jaime A. SIERRA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 99-70948.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2001.1

Decided March 26, 2001.

Before WALLACE, SILVERMAN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*458MEMORANDUM2

Jaime A. Sierra (“Petitioner”) petitions for review of the final order of deportation entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) on July 16, 1999. Petitioner was served with an order to show cause (“OSC”) on December 1, 1994—approximately five years and ten months after he entered the United States. At a hearing on May 15, 1997, the Immigration Judge denied Petitioner’s application for suspension of deportation because Petitioner had failed to meet the continuous physical presence requirement before being served with the OSC and thus was statutorily ineligible for suspension. On appeal, the BIA affirmed.

Petitioner contends that he was eligible for suspension of deportation and challenges the BIA’s decision that the “stop-time rule”—a new continuous physical presence requirement set forth in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, 110 Stat. 3009-625—bars such relief in his case. Petitioner’s arguments challenging the application of the stop-time rule are foreclosed by our recent decision in *Ram v. INS,*243 F.3d 510 (9th Cir.2001). We do not consider Petitioner’s eligibility, if any, for relief under the class action pending in the district court in accordance with *Barahona-Gomez v. Reno,*167 F.3d 1228 (9th Cir.1999), *supplemental opinion,*236 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir.2001). Our resolution of this case does not affect any interim or permanent relief awarded to members of the class certified in *Barahona-Gomez.*

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     I,  Geoffrey  Eiten,  certify  that:

          1.     I  have  reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mason
Hill  Holdings,  Inc.

          2.     Based  on  my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any  untrue  statement  of  a  material  fact  or  omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this  quarterly  report.

          3.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial statements, and other
financial  information  included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of  the  registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the periods presented in this quarterly
report.

          4.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  are
responsible  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as  defined  in  Exchange  Act  rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:

     A)     designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during  the  period  in  which  this  quarterly  report  is  being  prepared;

     B)     evaluated  the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  as  of  a  date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly  report  (the  "evaluation  date");  and

     C)     presented  in  this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as  of  the  evaluation  date;

          5.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the  audit  committee  of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the  equivalent  functions):

     A)     all  significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have  identified for the
registrant's  auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and

     B)     any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material, that involves management or
other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the registrant's internal
controls.

          6.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated
in  this  quarterly  report  whether  or  not  there were significant changes in
internal  controls  or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls  subsequent  to  the  date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective  actions  with  regard  to  significant  deficiencies  and  material
weaknesses.

     Date:     July  8,  2005

     /s/  Geoffrey  Eiten
     --------------------
     Geoffrey  Eiten
     President
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Narsi Narayanan, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of ClearOne Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ClearOne Communications, Inc.











Date:  May 17, 2010
By:
/s/ Narsi NarayananNarsi NarayananVice President of Finance
#### Rosa Gardner *v.*O. Williams.

Pleading Conclusion.

Where there is no averment that an intestate died childless nor that his father is not living, the statement in the petition that appellant is “the only heir at law” is only the statement of a conclusion of law.

APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

September 14, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

AVe cannot say that appellant shows herself entitled to any portion of the proceeds of the sale of the realty in question. The intestate was twice married. There is no averment that he died childless, nor that his father is not living. The statement in the petition that appellant is “the only heir at law” is but the statement of a conclusion of law.

The proof shows that the intestate had numerous brothers and sisters; and it is not shown that any of them are dead. There is no reason why the court should presume that all are dead except appellant, and further that they all died childless.

*51*Armstrong & Fleming, for appellant.*

*Lee & Ladam, for appellee.*

Appellant gets under the judgment appealed from as much as she has shown herself entitled to, if indeed she is entitled to anything.

Judgment *affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4540 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4540

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Blue 80.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2004

 Mr. Langevin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Blue 80.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON ACID BLUE 80.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.32.02      Acid Blue 80 Acid   Free         Free             No Change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Blue 80 (CAS                                                       31/2006
                         number 4474-24-2)
                         provided for in
                         subheading
                         3204.12.50.......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-163929,
No. 333-19011, No. 333-71373, No. 333-42276, No. 333-45534, No. 333-73652, No. 333-89176, and No. 333-141458),
on Form S-3 (No. 333-160577) and on Form S-1 (No. 333-168906) of MicroVision, Inc. of our report dated March 9, 2011,
relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Seattle, Washington
   March 9, 2011

---