alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  






 

	
	SPECIMEN SPECIMEN
NUMBER
SHARES
COMMON STOCK
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
DELAWARE
SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
CUSIP 011642 10 5
THIS CERTIFIES
THAT:
SPECIMEN
IS THE OWNER OF
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON
STOCK OF $.01 PAR VALUE EACH OF ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by attorney upon surrender of this certificate duly endorsed or assigned. This certificate and the shares represented hereby are
subject to the laws of the State of Delaware, and to the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Corporation, as now or hereafter amended. This certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent.
WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.
DATED:
SECRETARY
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
CORPORATE
SEAL
2009
DELAWARE
PRESIDENT
COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC
BROOKLYN,
NY
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
BY:
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE








 



 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were
written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
TEN COM - as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - 
Custodian 
TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties (Cust) (Minor) 
JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of under Uniform Gifts to Minors 
survivorship and not as
tenants in common Act (State) 
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 
For Value Received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR
OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) 
Shares of the stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 
Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
Dated 
NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON
THE FACE 
OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. 
Signature(s) Guaranteed 
By 
The Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution 
(Banks, Stockbrokers,
Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions with membership in an approved Signature Guarantee Medallion Program), pursuant to SEC Rule 17Ad-15. 
THE
CORPORATION WILL FURNISH TO ANY STOCKHOLDER, UPON REQUEST AND WITHOUT CHARGE, A FULL STATEMENT OF THE DESIGNATIONS, RELATIVE RIGHTS, PREFERENCES AND LIMITATIONS OF THE SHARES OF EACH CLASS AND SERIES AUTHORIZED TO BE ISSUED, SO FAR AS THE SAME HAVE
BEEN DETERMINED, AND OF THE AUTHORITY, IF ANY, OF THE BOARD TO DIVIDE THE SHARES INTO CLASSES OR SERIES AND TO DETERMINE AND CHANGE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS, PREFERENCES AND LIMITATIONS OF ANY CLASS OR SERIES. SUCH REQUEST MAY BE MADE TO THE SECRETARY OF
THE CORPORATION OR TO THE TRANSFER AGENT NAMED ON THIS CERTIFICATE. 
COLUMBIA PRINTING SERVICES, LLC - www.stockinformation.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE :

INSURANCE COMPANY,

:

Plaintiff,

:

vs. CA 05-0412-C

:

JOHNSON HOMES OF 

MERIDIAN, INC. and :

MICHELLE HAMPTON,

:

Defendants.

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on this date, it is

hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Michelle Hampton’s motion to

dismiss this declaratory judgment action for want of jurisdiction is DENIED; however, the

Court hereby GRANTS Hampton’s alternative motion to abstain from proceeding to a

judgment on the merits in this action in favor of the parallel proceeding in the Circuit Court

of Choctaw County, Alabama (Doc. 4). The Court further ORDERS, ADJUDGES and

DECREES that the instant declaratory judgment action be DISMISSED in favor of the

parallel state action presently pending in the Circuit Court of Choctaw County, 

Alabama.

DONE this the 24th day of October, 2005.

 /s/ WILLIAM E. CASSADY 

Case 1:05-cv-00412-C Document 13 Filed 10/24/05 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00412-C Document 13 Filed 10/24/05 Page 2 of 2
ex102.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 



UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE









	
U.S. $150,000.00

	
April 15, 2015







 




FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Eos-Petro, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Issuer”), hereby promises to pay to the order of Clearview Partners II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Payee”), at such place as the Payee shall direct in writing, the principal sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00), with interest at 10.00% on the unpaid balance.  All references to Dollars herein are to lawful currency of the United States of America.







All unpaid principal of this Note and accrued interest shall be due and payable on September 15, 2015 (the “Maturity Date”). This Note may be prepaid at any time in whole or in part without penalty.







In any action at law or in equity to enforce or construe any provisions or rights under this Note, the unsuccessful party or parties to such litigation, as determined by a court pursuant to a final offer, judgment or decree, shall pay to the successful party or parties all costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by such successful party.







This Note and all actions arising out of or in connection with this Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions of the State of California, or of any other state.







Eos-Petro, Inc.


A Nevada corporation


 


By: /s/ Nikolas Konstant


    Nicholas Konstant


    Its: Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.1

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

20% CONVERTIBLE SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

 

This First Amendment to 20% Convertible Secured Promissory Note (this “Amendment”) is entered into on May 5, 2015, and effective April 26, 2015 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Wisdom Homes of America, Inc. (f/k/a SearchCore, Inc.), a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and Robert S. and Rita DeLue, Trustees of the Robert S. and Rita DeLue 1995 Revocable Family Trust (the “Holder”).

 

RECITALS

 

WHEREAS, the Company and Holder are parties to that certain 20% Convertible Secured Promissory Note dated April 26, 2014, in the original principal amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) (the “Original Note”); and

 

WHEREAS, the Company and Holder desire to amend certain provisions of the Original Note, effective as of April 26, 2015, as set forth herein.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and adequate consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Holder agree as follows:

 

AGREEMENT

 

1. The first paragraph of the Original Note is restated in its entirety as follows:

 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, SearchCore, Inc., a Nevada corporation, its assigns and successors (the “Company”), hereby promises to pay to the order of the Robert S. and Rita DeLue, Trustees of the Robert S. and Rita DeLue 1995 Revocable Family Trust (the “Holder”), in immediately available funds, the total principal sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00). The principal hereof and any unpaid accrued interest thereon shall be due and payable on or before 5:00 p.m., Pacific Time, on April 30, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”) (unless such payment date is accelerated as provided in Section 5 hereof). Payment of all amounts due hereunder shall be made at the address of the Holder provided for in Section 6 hereof. Interest shall accrue at the rate of twenty percent (20%) per annum on this Note from the date hereof. Any accrued interest shall be paid in full on the first day of each month beginning on June 1, 2014.

 

2.  Other than as set forth herein, the terms and conditions of the Original Note shall remain in full force and effect.

 

[remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page to follow]

 

	 
	
1








	





  

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Holder have executed this Agreement on the date first written above.

 

	 	
“Company”

	 	 	
“Holder”

	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	
Wisdom Homes of Nevada, Inc.,

	 	 	
Robert S. and Rita DeLue 1995 Revocable

	 
	 	
a Nevada corporation

	 	 	
Family Trust

	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	
/s/ James Pakulis

	 	 	
/s/ Robert S. Delue

	 
	
By:

	
James Pakulis

	 	
By:

	
Robert S. DeLue

	 
	
Its:

	
President

	 	
Its:

	
Trustee

	 
	
 

	
 

		
 

	
 

	
	
 

	
 

		
 

	
/s/ Rita DeLue 

	
	
 

	
 

		
By:

	Rita DeLue	
	
 

	
 

		
Its:

	Trustee	


 

 

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BERNICE MUHAMMAD, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) 1:10-CV-00096-SC

 )

OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORP., )

et al., )

 )

Defendant. )

ORDER

The Court has for consideration Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment

against defendant Scott J. Humphrey (Doc. 99), filed August 3, 2010; motion

to reconsider the dismissal of Scott J. Humphrey and Barry Friedman (Doc.

100), filed August 3, 2010; and motion for relief from judgment pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) (Doc. 101), filed August 6, 2010.

Plaintiff’s motions are DENIED. 

In response to Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended

complaint on March 19, 2010 (Doc. 17), the Court issued an Order generally

summarizing rules of civil procedure and the factual requirements for a

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:10-cv-00096-SC-M Document 102 Filed 08/09/10 Page 1 of 2
well-pled complaint (Doc. 22). Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint failed

to state a claim against all named defendants, including Scott J. Humphrey

and Barry Friedman. Plaintiff has not established any grounds for relief from

this Court’s order of dismissal under Federal Rule of Procedure 60(b). To

the extent Plaintiff seeks recusal of the undersigned, that request is also

DENIED. 

Done this 9th day of August 2010.

 ____________ 

L. SCOTT COOGLER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

139297

Page 2 of 2

Case 1:10-cv-00096-SC-M Document 102 Filed 08/09/10 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Narsi Narayanan, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of ClearOne Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ClearOne Communications, Inc.











Date:  August 12, 2010
By:
/s/ Narsi NarayananNarsi NarayananVice President of Finance
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1548 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2023 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to specify 

that actions of the Advocate for Small Business Capital 

Formation are not a collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 1548 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Access to 

3 Small Business Information Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION 

5 ACT. 

6 Section 4(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

7 (15 U.S.C. 78d(j)) is amended by adding at the end the 

8 following: 

9 ‘‘(10) EXCLUSION FROM THE PAPERWORK RE10 DUCTION ACT.— 

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Actions taken by the 

12 Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation 

13 under this subsection shall not be a ‘collection 

14 of information’ for purposes of subchapter I of 

15 chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code 

16 (commonly known as the ‘Paperwork Reduction 

17 Act’). 

18 ‘‘(B) EXCEPTIONS.—Subparagraph (A) 

19 shall not apply to the requirements under sub20 sections (c)(1), (c)(4), and (i) of section 3506 

21 of such title and section 3507(a)(1)(A) of such 

22 title, except that the Commission shall not be 

23 required— 

24 ‘‘(i) to submit a collection of informa25 tion by the Advocate to the Director of the 

26 Office of Management and Budget, as deVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:49 Jul 12, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1548.RFS H1548

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

HR 1548 RFS

1 scribed under section 3506(c)(1)(A) of 

2 such title; 

3 ‘‘(ii) to display a control number on a 

4 collection of information by the Advocate, 

5 as described under section 

6 3506(c)(1)(B)(i) of such title (or to inform 

7 a person receiving a collection of informa8 tion from the Advocate that the collection 

9 of information needs to display a control 

10 number, as described under section 

11 3506(c)(1)(B)(iii)(V) of such title); or 

12 ‘‘(iii) to indicate a collection of infor13 mation by the Advocate is in accordance 

14 with the clearance requirements of section 

15 3507 of such title, as described under sec16 tion 3506(c)(1)(B)(ii) of such title.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 11, 2023. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 10(s)
                     AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO THE
                JOHN W. BIDDINGER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This Agreement amends by adding a longer term to the existing
Amendment Number, One of the Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") dated
April 28, 1993, between SunGroup, Inc. (the "Company"), and John W. Biddinger
(the "Employee").

         Amendment Number One dated April 28, 1993, will be amended by
substituting a new Amendment as follows:

         1.      Employment and Term.  Company does hereby employ Employee and
                 Employee does hereby agree to enter into the employment of
                 the Company for the compensation provided under the terms and
                 conditions hereinafter set forth.  The term of this Agreement
                 shall commence on April 7, 1995, (the "Commencement date")
                 and shall continue for a term ending on the first to occur of
                 the death of the Employee, or May 3 1, 2000, unless continued
                 by written agreement of both parties or terminated as set
                 forth herein.  Company and Employee both concur that this
                 contract should be extended by January 31, 1999, if both
                 parties want to continue the employment relationship,
                 Employee should take the responsibility to initiate contract
                 extension discussions in late 1998.

         Dated:  April 7. 1995

                                       SUNGROUP, INC.

                                       By:    /s/ JAMES M. ELLIOTT
                                           -------------------------------
                                              James M. Elliott, Director


                                       By:    /s/ DAN E. YOUNG
                                           -------------------------------
                                              Dan E. Young, Director

                                       EMPLOYEE

                                       By:    /s/ JOHN W. BIDDINGER
                                           -------------------------------
                                              John W. Biddinger







                                      25
**Exhibit 13.11**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Inmarsat Leasing (Two) Limited (the“Company”) for the annual period ended 31 December 2006 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Andrew Sukawaty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in thePeriodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Date: 29 April 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1547 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1547

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a study on the 
costs and benefits of commuter rail passenger transportation involving 
                   transfers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``One Seat Ride Act''.

SEC. 2. STUDY ON COMMUTER SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Transportation shall conduct a 
study identifying the benefits of commuter rail passenger 
transportation and major obstacles to providing commuter rail passenger 
transportation that does not involve a transfer for passengers.
    (b) Requirements.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), 
the Secretary shall--
            (1) consider economic, logistical, and quality of life 
        factors in analyzing the major obstacles to implementing 
        single-seat trips on commuter rail passenger transportation for 
        as many passengers as possible; and
            (2) include in such study an analysis of the costs and 
        benefits with respect to single-seat trips on commuter rail 
        passenger transportation on the New Jersey Transit Raritan 
        Valley line during peak hours and the impact such trips would 
        have on other New Jersey Transit lines.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate a report on the study 
required under subsection (a).
    (d) Commuter Rail Passenger Transportation Defined.--In this 
section, the term ``commuter rail passenger transportation'' has the 
meaning given such term in section 24102 of title 49, United States 
Code.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 5, 2023.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1547

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a study on the 
costs and benefits of commuter rail passenger transportation involving 
                   transfers, and for other purposes.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000840459
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND XVIII LTD PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,381,195
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,392,051
<PP&E>                                      12,982,546
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,170,704)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,203,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          420,393
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,783,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,203,893
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               405,549
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  153,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                252,081
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            252,081
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   252,081
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.61
        

</TABLE>
10709.

#### Bateman *v.*Macon National Bank *et al.*

Jenkins, P. J.

The terms of the act creating the municipal court of Macon by which it is provided (Ga. L. 1913, p. 258, § 20) that “suits shall be filed in the clerk’s office of said court at least fifteen days before the first day of the term to which it is returnable,” and that all cases which on the call are marked in default shall be “ripe for trial *43and judgment,” have reference only to civil cases brought by ordinary petition, and do not pertain to attachment eases. *Davis*v. *Williams,*148 *Ga. 705*(98 S. E. 338). In such a case the provisions of section 15 of the act are applicable, by which it is provided that such a proceeding is to be returned and disposed of under the rules pertaining to the superior or justice’s courts, as the case may be. Thus, where a judgment by default in the sum of $300 was rendered at the first term against a non-resident defendant in attachment and against - the garnishee in attachment, the judge of the municipal court did not err in proceeding on his own motion, during the same term, to vacate and set them aside. The quoted provisions of section 20 of the act not being applicable, final judgment could not legally be rendered in such a case until the second term *(Lambert Hoisting Engine Co.*v. *Bray.*117 *Ga.*4, 43 S. E. 371), and then could be rendered only on proof being made. *Fincher*v. *Stanley Electric Mfg. Co.,*127 *Ga.*362 (56 S. E. 440).

Decided March 11, 1920.

Certiorari; from Bibb superior court — Judge Mathews. May 21, 1919.

*Feagin & Hancock,*for plaintiff in error.

*Miller & Jones,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.*