alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NIST: Promoting U.S. Innovation

and Industrial Competitiveness

Belinda Collins, Ph.D.

Director, Technology Services
NIST Today: Mission

To promote U.S. 

innovation and industrial 

competitiveness by 

advancing

measurement science,

standards, and

technology

in ways that enhance 

economic security and 

improve our quality of life

©Robert Rathe

2
NIST At A Glance

Major Assets

 ~ 2,900 employees

 ~ 2600 associates and facilities users

 ~ 1,600 field staff in partner organizations

 ~ 400 NIST staff serving on 1,000 national 

and international standards committees 

Major Programs

 NIST Laboratories

 Baldrige National Quality Program

 Manufacturing Extension Partnership

 Technology Innovation Program

©Robert Rathe

© Geoffrey Wheeler

3
NIST has... ... two main campuses

Boulder, CO

Gaithersburg, MD

Courtesy HDR Architecture, Inc./Steve Hall ©Hedrich Blessing

©Geoffrey Wheeler

4
The NIST Laboratories

5
Bio-Imaging Showcase

6

 Leverage our nation’s innovation and investment in 

science and technology to grow our economy and 

American competitiveness

 Provides access to NIST and NIH technologies

 Highlights 40 new life sciences and medical bioimaging technologies available for licensing and/or 

collaboration

 Includes 24 presentations and many posters

 Provides informative, networking opportunities
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Historic Preservation Properties 1989
LP ("HPP'89") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended Setember 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report")
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HPP'89.


/s/ Terrence P. Sullivan
-------------------------------------
Terrence P. Sullivan
General Partner
(Performing similar functions of the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer)

Date: November 14, 2005
<page>	EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund II L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey
A. Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		May 16, 2005
**Exhibit99.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

                I, Sandra G. Sciutto, being the Chief FinancialOfficer of California Coastal Communities, Inc. (the "Company")hereby certify pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge as of the date setforth below (i) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the periodended June 30, 2002 which accompanies this certification (the"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   August 12, 2002 |   | /s/ Sandra G. Sciutto   |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                          |   | Sandra G. Sciutto       |
|                          |   | Chief Financial Officer |
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

        EXHIBIT 12 -- COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
             (COMBINED WITH 50%-OWNED UNCONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES)

<Table>
<Caption>
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31                      2002     2001     2000     1999     1998
(In millions)                                        -----    -----    -----    -----    -----
<S>                                                  <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Income (loss) from continuing operations...........  $ 220    $ 165    $ 113    $(112)   $  82
Add
  Interest.........................................     96      107      134      146      133
  Portion of rentals representative of interest
     factor........................................     14       14       15       18       12
  Preferred stock dividend requirements of
     majority-owned subsidiaries...................     --       --       --       --        1
  Income expense (benefit) and other taxes on
     income........................................    146      118       91      (47)      67
  Amortization of interest capitalized.............      1        1       --       --       --
                                                     -----    -----    -----    -----    -----
Earnings as defined................................  $ 477    $ 405    $ 353    $   5    $ 295
                                                     =====    =====    =====    =====    =====
Interest...........................................  $  96    $ 107    $ 134    $ 146    $ 133
Interest capitalized...............................      5        4        5       --        1
Portion of rentals representative of interest
  factor...........................................     14       14       15       18       12
Preferred stock dividend requirements of
  majority-owned subsidiaries on a pretax basis....     --       --       --       --        2
                                                     -----    -----    -----    -----    -----
Fixed charges as defined...........................  $ 115    $ 125    $ 154    $ 164    $ 148
                                                     =====    =====    =====    =====    =====
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.................   4.15     3.24     2.29     (a)      1.99
                                                     =====    =====    =====    =====    =====
</Table>

---------------

(a) In 1999, earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $159 million.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1443 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1443

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil and gas 
  preleasing, leasing, and related activities in certain areas of the 
    Outer Continental Shelf off the coast of Florida, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2023

Ms. Castor of Florida (for herself, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Soto, Mr. Frost, 
 Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick, Ms. Lois Frankel of Florida, Mr. Moskowitz, 
   Ms. Wilson of Florida, and Ms. Wasserman Schultz) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil and gas 
  preleasing, leasing, and related activities in certain areas of the 
    Outer Continental Shelf off the coast of Florida, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Florida Coastal Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRELEASING, LEASING, AND 
              RELATED ACTIVITIES IN CERTAIN AREAS OFF THE COAST OF 
              FLORIDA.

    Section 18 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 
1344) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(j) Prohibition of Oil and Natural Gas Preleasing, Leasing, and 
Related Activities in Certain Areas Off the Coast of Florida.--
            ``(1) Prohibition.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        this section or any other law, the Secretary may not offer for 
        oil and gas leasing, preleasing, or any related activity any 
        tract located in--
                    ``(A) any area of the Eastern Gulf of Mexico that 
                is referred to in section 104(a) of the Gulf of Mexico 
                Energy Security Act of 2006;
                    ``(B) the portion of the South Atlantic Planning 
                Area south of 30 degrees 43 minutes North Latitude; or
                    ``(C) the Straits of Florida Planning Area.
            ``(2) Limitation on effect.--Nothing in this subsection 
        affects any right under any lease issued under this Act before 
        the date of enactment of this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1727 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1727

 To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act to extend the 
     Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2023

Mr. Trone (for himself, Mr. Mooney, Mr. Raskin, Ms. Norton, Ms. Wexton, 
 Mr. Connolly, and Mr. Beyer) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act to extend the 
     Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National 
Historical Park Commission Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK COMMISSION.

    Section 6(g) of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act (16 
U.S.C. 410y-4(g)) is amended by striking ``40'' and all that follows 
through the period at the end and inserting ``on September 30, 2034.''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 24, 2014

t0121 

# Order

Clerk January 24, 2014

146521

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146521

COA: 300959

Kent CC: 09

- 011041

- FC

JASON LEE SHAVER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been granted and the briefs and oral

arguments of the parties having been considered by the Court, we VACATE our order of

September 20, 2013. The application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2012 judgment

of the Court of Appeals is DENIED, because we are no longer persuaded that the

ques tions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
SUBROUTINE UNISF(P,SF)
C
C     PURPOSE--THIS SUBROUTINE COMPUTES THE SPARSITY
C              FUNCTION VALUE FOR THE UNIFORM (RECTANGULAR) 
C              DISTRIBUTION ON THE UNIT INTERVAL (0,1).
C              THIS DISTRIBUTION HAS MEAN = 0.5
C              AND STANDARD DEVIATION = SQRT(1/12) = 0.28867513.
C              THIS DISTRIBUTION HAS THE PROBABILITY
C              DENSITY FUNCTION F(X) = 1.
C              NOTE THAT THE SPARSITY FUNCTION OF A DISTRIBUTION
C              IS THE DERIVATIVE OF THE PERCENT POINT FUNCTION,
C              AND ALSO IS THE RECIPROCAL OF THE PROBABILITY
C              DENSITY FUNCTION (BUT IN UNITS OF P RATHER THAN X).
C     INPUT  ARGUMENTS--P      = THE SINGLE PRECISION VALUE 
C                                (BETWEEN 0.0 AND 1.0)
C                                AT WHICH THE SPARSITY
C                                FUNCTION IS TO BE EVALUATED.
C     OUTPUT ARGUMENTS--SF     = THE SINGLE PRECISION SPARSITY
C                                FUNCTION VALUE.
C     OUTPUT--THE SINGLE PRECISION
C             SPARSITY FUNCTION VALUE SF.
C     PRINTING--NONE UNLESS AN INPUT ARGUMENT ERROR CONDITION EXISTS. 
C     RESTRICTIONS--P SHOULD BE BETWEEN 0.0 AND 1.0, INCLUSIVELY.
C     OTHER DATAPAC   SUBROUTINES NEEDED--NONE.
C     FORTRAN LIBRARY SUBROUTINES NEEDED--NONE.
C     MODE OF INTERNAL OPERATIONS--SINGLE PRECISION.
C     LANGUAGE--ANSI FORTRAN. 
C     REFERENCES--FILLIBEN, SIMPLE AND ROBUST LINEAR ESTIMATION
C                 OF THE LOCATION PARAMETER OF A SYMMETRIC
C                 DISTRIBUTION (UNPUBLISHED PH.D. DISSERTATION,
C                 PRINCETON UNIVERSITY), 1969, PAGES 21-44, 229-231.
C               --FILLIBEN, 'THE PERCENT POINT FUNCTION',
C                 (UNPUBLISHED MANUSCRIPT), 1970, PAGES 28-31.
C               --JOHNSON AND KOTZ, CONTINUOUS UNIVARIATE
C                 DISTRIBUTIONS--2, 1970, PAGES 57-74.
C     WRITTEN BY--JAMES J. FILLIBEN
C                 STATISTICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY (205.03)
C                 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
C                 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20234
C                 PHONE:  301-921-2315
C     ORIGINAL VERSION--JUNE      1972. 
C     UPDATED         --SEPTEMBER 1975. 
C     UPDATED         --NOVEMBER  1975. 
C
C---------------------------------------------------------------------
C
      IPR=6
C
C     CHECK THE INPUT ARGUMENTS FOR ERRORS
C
      IF(P.LT.0.0.OR.P.GT.1.0)GOTO50
      GOTO90
   50 WRITE(IPR,1)
      WRITE(IPR,46)P
      RETURN
   90 CONTINUE
    1 FORMAT(1H ,115H***** FATAL ERROR--THE FIRST  INPUT ARGUMENT TO THE
     1 UNISF  SUBROUTINE IS OUTSIDE THE ALLOWABLE (0,1) INTERVAL *****)
   46 FORMAT(1H , 35H***** THE VALUE OF THE ARGUMENT IS ,E15.8,6H *****)
C
C-----START POINT-----------------------------------------------------
C
      SF=1.0
C
      RETURN
      END
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS**

 

We hereby consent to all references to Ryder Scott Company, L.P. and/or the reports prepared by Ryder Scott Company, L.P.entitled “Estimated Future Reserves and Income Attributable to Certain Leasehold and Royalty Interests SEC Case as of December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003” in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and to the incorporation byreference into Spinnaker Exploration Company’s previously filed registration statement No. 333-89894 on Form S-3 and registration statements No. 333-105461, 333-89779, 333-36592 and 333-61888 on Form S-8. 

 

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P. 

 

March 10, 2004
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     I,  Geoffrey  Eiten,  certify  that:

          1.     I  have  reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mason
Hill  Holdings,  Inc.;

          2.     Based  on  my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any  untrue  statement  of  a  material  fact  or  omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this  quarterly  report;

          3.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial statements, and other
financial  information  included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of  the  registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

          4.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  are
responsible  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as  defined  in  Exchange  Act  rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:

     A)     designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during  the  period  in  which  this  quarterly  report  is  being  prepared;

     B)     evaluated  the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  as  of  a  date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly  report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and

     C)     presented  in  this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as  of  the  Evaluation  Date;

          5.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the  audit  committee  of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the  equivalent  functions):

     A)     all  significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have  identified for the
registrant's  auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and

     B)     any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material, that involves management or
other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the registrant's internal
controls;  and

          6.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated
in  this  quarterly  report  whether  or  not  there were significant changes in
internal  controls  or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls  subsequent  to  the  date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective  actions  with  regard  to  significant  deficiencies  and  material
weaknesses.


     Date:     July  8,  2005

     /s/  Geoffrey  Eiten
     --------------------
     Geoffrey  Eiten
     President
DISMISS; Opinion filed December 6, 2012

In The

nitrt nf :ppiati

iftt! Ditrirt nf ixzu at Ja11zti

No. 05-12-00482-CV

TENNA R. ADAMS AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF

7318 ELDERBERRY LANE, l)ALLAS, TEXAS 75239, Appellants

V.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appcllee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-l1-08457-C

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Moseley. Francis, and Lang

Opinion By Justice Francis

Before the Court is appellee’s November 14, 2012 motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellee

contends the appeal should be dismissed for failure to prosecute. By letter dated October 15, 2012.

the Court informed appellants that their brief was past due. The Court instructed appellants to file

their brief with an extension motion within ten days and that failure to do so would result in

dismissal of their appeal. See TEx. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). As of today’s date, appellants have not

filed a brief.

Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEx. R. App. P.

38.8(a)(l) & 42.3(b) & (C). I

/ j -

JUST1CI’

I 20482F.P05
(nairt uf 41t1ra1!

FiftI! itrirt t.if 1ixa at Jalla&

JUDGMENT

TENNA R. ADAMS ANI) ALL OTHER Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

OCCUPANTS OF 7318 ELDERBERRY of Dallas County, Texas. (TrCt.No. CC-IlLANE, DALLAS, TEXAS 75249, Appellants 08457-C).

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis. Justices

No. 05-l2-00482-CV V. Moseley and Lang, participating.

WELLS FARGo BANK, N.A., Appellee

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date. the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORI)EREI) that appellee. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., recover its costs ofthe appeal from

appellants, Tenna R. Adams and All Other Occupants of7318 Elderberry Lane, Dallas, Texas 75249.

Judgment entered December 6. 2012.

•\ I i i

it ]JL ‘L’’

MOLLY FR NCIS

JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51587

AVINASH RANGRA; ANNA MONCLOVA Plaintiffs-Appellants vs. FRANK D. BROWN, District Attorney; GREG ABBOTT, Texas Attorney General Defendants-Appellees

- - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas

- - - - - ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion April 24, 2009, 5 Cir., 2009,

_____ F.3d

____ ) (July 27, 2009) BEFORE: JONES, Chief Judge, KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, WIENER,

BARKSDALE, GARZA, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT: A member of the court having requested a poll on the petitions for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor, It is ordered that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D July 27, 2009 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
ACCEPTED 12-15-00204-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 12/18/2015 1:59:33 PM

Pam Estes CLERK
| 1.   | The Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  April 27, 2010 | /s/ Joseph D. Reid                                                      Joseph D. ReidChief Executive Officer |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0029

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSE LUIS PERALTA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 25, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 20 2021

05/20/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0029