alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 

May 13, 2015 
 Securities and Exchange Commission 

100 F Street, N.E. 
 Washington, D.C. 20549 

 

	 	Re:	Providence and Worcester Railroad Company – Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2015 


Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 Providence and Worcester
Railroad Company, a Rhode Island corporation (the “Registrant”), is today filing its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2015 (the “Form 10-Q”). 

Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, copies of certain instruments defining the rights of holders of certain long-term
debt obligations of the Registrant under which the total amount of long-term debt authorized does not exceed ten percent (10%) of the total assets of the Registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis are not filed with the 10-Q. In
accordance with the provisions of Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of each such instrument or agreement. 

 

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	PROVIDENCE AND WORCESTER RAILROAD COMPANY
	
	 /s/ Daniel T. Noreck

	Name:		Daniel T. Noreck
	Title:		Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
10238.

#### Southern Railway Company *v.*Cagle.

Jenkins, J.

1. The right which a riparian owner of land adjacent to a non-navigable stream has to a reasonable use and consumption of its water does not include the right to use, divert, or diminish the supply so as materially and unreasonably to interfere with the rights and uses of a lower owner. Primarily each has the same and a common right to the natural and undisturbed flow of the stream, subject only to such detention or diminution as may be occasioned by a reasonable use *94by others. Whether in a given instance such use shall be taken as reasonable or unreasonable is a question to be determined by the jury upon the particular facts of the case, including, among other things, the size and character of the stream, and the uses to which it is subservient. *White*v. *East Lake Land Co.,*96 *Ga.*415 (23 S. E. 393, 51 Am. St. R141).

Decided July 17, 1919.

Action for damages; from Hall superior court—Judge J. B. Jones. November 9, 1918.

*E. A. Neely, J. 0. Adams, Ed. Quillian, O. L. Faulhner,*for plaintiff in error.

*Claude Barrett, C. N. Davis,*contra.

2. The petition, as amended, seeking specified damages because of the alleged unreasonable diversion of water on the part of the defendant, whereby the earnings of the plaintiff’s mill property were diminished, set forth a cause of action. The exceptions taken to the overruling of the special grounds of demurrer are without merit. The charge of the court is without material error. It can not be said that the amount of the verdict (though in our opinion liberal) is altogether without evidence to support it.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
#### W. R. Covington *v.*Mary B. Scott.

Judgment — Clerical Misprision — Motion.

A clerical misprision is the erroneous entering or recording of a judgment rendered by a court, and may be corrected by motion.

Judgment Correctly Entered.

A judgment correctly entered but which is erroneous cannot be corrected by motion, but must be appealed from.

*139APPEAL PROM WARREN CIRCUIT COURT.

October 9, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

There is nothing upon the face of the judgment of August 13, 1864, indicating an error upon the part of the clerk in entering it in the order book. It is true it speaks of the sum ordered to be paid into- court, as the amount of these notes, when as matter of fact the petition set up four notes; but it further appears that the circuit court judicially determined that the payment into court of said .sum, discharged the lien on the land sold by Simpson’s executor to Covington, and that it made up the full balance of the purchase money due by Covington. It is possible that this judicial determination was erroneous, and that upon appeal the judgment of the circuit court would have been reversed; but the mistake of the court in ascertaining and adjudging the amount of the indebtedness was an error of judgment, and not a clerical misprision. We understand a clerical misprision to be the erroneous entering or recording of the judgment actually rendered by the court. An error of this character will always be corrected upon motion, when there is anything in the record to correct by, and it is immaterial whether the mistake be occasioned by the court or the clerk; but when the judgment actually rendered is correctly entered or recorded, it can, in no case, be treated as a clerical error, although it may be manifestly erroneous.

Appellee, in her notice, does not assume that there was any mistake made by the clerk, but that there had been a mistake made in the calculation of the interest due on the notes sued on. It is palpable from the record, that this calculation was not made by the clerk, and that the mistake in this regard (if one was made) was the mistake of the parties or of the court, in ascertaining the amount due, and that it was in no sense a clerical error. The circuit court did not adjudge that there was a clerical misprision, but that Covington had not paid into court the full amount of his indebtedness, and therefore it further adjudged that he should pay to appellee the further sum of $820, with interest from August 13, 1864. This was substantially a reversal of so much of the judgment rendered nearly nine years before, as determined that the full amount due on the notes had been paid into court, and the lien thereby discharged. It is not pretended that the circuit court has any such power as this. *140The judgment of February 19, 1873, is *reversed*and the cause remanded with instructions to dismiss the motion.

*A. Duvall, J. P. Bates, for appellant.*

*A. James, for appellee.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAVID L. JOHNSON, AIS 134016, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-0228-CG-C

)

PENTON ASHWORTH, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant 

to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation 

of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated December 

18, 2012 (Doc. 185) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default judgment as to defendant, Christopher 

Mummert, is hereby GRANTED. The amount of damages defendant Mummert 

owes to the plaintiff will be determined following an evidentiary hearing and 

incorporated in the final report and recommendation.

DONE and ORDERED this 30th day of January, 2013.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00228-CG-C Document 197 Filed 01/30/13 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

FRANCIS PATRON §

§ No. 117, 2018

Petitioner-Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below: Family Court 

§ of the State of Delaware

v. §

§

LUCY O’NEIL § C.A. No. CS16-01550

§

Respondent-Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: October 31, 2018

 Decided: November 2, 2018

Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN and SEITZ, Justices.

O R D E R

This 2

nd day of November 2018, having considered this matter on the briefs of the 

parties and the record below, and having concluded that the same should be affirmed on 

the basis of, and for the reasons assigned by the Family Court in its Opinion dated February 

7, 2018,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family Court be 

AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from US
Neurosurgical 10K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            464,000
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     300,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  873,000
<PP&E>                                          8,413,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  4,099,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  5,283,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,615,000
<BONDS>                                         2,794,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           73,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,151,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    5,283,000
<SALES>                                         3,089,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                3,089,000
<CGS>                                           1,115,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,560,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                409,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   139,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                       73,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                66,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       66,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .01



</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I,    Anna T. Chew, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of  Monmouth Capital Corporation;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably



---

likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date:    April 11, 2007









By:  /s/ Anna T. Chew

Anna T. Chew

Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
March 26, 1999




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
The Monarch Machine Tool Company and Subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No.
2-92311 and File No. 33-80332) of our report dated February 11, 1999, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule
of The Monarch Machine Tool Company and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and
1997, and for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Dayton, Ohio


                                       49
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

***URANIUM RESOURCES, INC.***

405 State Highway 121 Bypass, Building A, Suite 110, Lewisville,TX 75067

972.219.3330 Phone 972.219.3311 Fax

 

November 8,2010

 

Securitiesand Exchange Commission

4505th Street, N.W.

Washington,D.C. 20549

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I,Donald C. Ewigleben, President and Chief Executive Officer of UraniumResources, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)  TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30,2010 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| */s/* Donald C. Ewigleben                                         | * * |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|
| Donald  C. Ewigleben                                              |     |
| President,  Chief Executive Officer   and Chief Operating Officer |     |
| November 8,  2010                                            |     |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Casey J. Sylla, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

a)                          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)                         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)                          Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)                          All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)                         Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

May 8, 2006

 
|   | /s/  CASEY J. SYLLA                 |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Casey  J. Sylla                     |
|   | Chairman of the Board and President |

 

E-4

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, December 18, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Stein, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: December 11, 2014.

Brent J. Fields,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-29502 Filed 12-12-14; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit 31.02

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John Huyett, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K of Kana Software, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 19, 2004

/s/ John Huyett		John Huyett
Chief Financial Officer
#### Irvine T. Green *v.*D. T. Smith’s Trustee, et al.

Landlord and Tenant — Lien of Landlord.

The; lien of a landlord on the proceeds of the premises and on fixtures and household furniture of the tenant owned by him after possession, cannot be for more than one year’s rent nor for rent which has been due for more than 120 days.

APPEAL FROM MADISON CIRCUIT COURT.

April 11, 1876.

Opinion by

Judge Coper :

A landlord has a superior lien on the proceeds of the farm or premises rented, on the fixtures, on the household furniture, and other personal property of the tenant or under-tenant, owned by him after possession is taken under the lease; but such lien shall not be for more than one year’s rent due or to become due, nor for any rent which has been due for more than one hundred twenty days. Sec. 13, Art. I, Chap. 66, Rev. Stat.

Whether the renting was by the year or by the half year, makes no difference. The rent was to be paid half yearly, and when the first note was executed that amount was then due, and when the deed of *674trust was made, it had been due for more than 120 days, and the landlord’s lien had already been lost.

*T. I. Scott, for appellant.*

*E. W. Turner, A. R. Biirnam, for appellees.*

Judgment *affirmed.*