alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
October 6, 2015

1
2015 Top Investment Areas

 Advanced Networking and Communications

 Cyber-Physical Systems

 Cybersecurity/Cryptography

 Identity Management

 Measurement Science Collaborations

2
2020 Investment Expectations

 Advanced Networking and Communications

 Big Data

 Cyber-Physical Systems

 Cybersecurity/Cryptography

 Privacy

 Measurement Science Collaborations

 Forensics

 Quantum Information Science

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MONMOUTH CAPITAL CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         228,928
<SECURITIES>                                   420,986
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,567,929
<ALLOWANCES>                                   119,753
<INVENTORY>                                  1,609,906
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,034,375
<PP&E>                                       1,154,215
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,994,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          590,943
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,408,464
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,933,710
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,994,684
<SALES>                                      2,182,016
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,788,741
<CGS>                                        1,689,915
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  523,492
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               452,228
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             103,896
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,210
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,510
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,510
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2***

 

SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of California Coastal Communities, Inc. (the  “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Sandra G. Sciutto, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby 18 U.S.C. 1350 has been provided to California Coastal Communities, Inc. andwill be retained by California Coastal Communities, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated: November 4, 2004 | /s/ Sandra G. Sciutto   |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                    | Sandra G. Sciutto       |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----

*In accordance withclause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), the above certification (A) shall not be deemed“filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shallnot be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, except to the extent that the Company explicitly incorporates it byreference in any such filing.

 

----
10782.

#### Devoe *v.*Best Motor Company.

Stephens, J.

1. Where a defendant maintained a gas tank with a patent pump attached thereto, operated by electricity controlled by a switch attached to the tank, which, when cut off while the pump was “ pulling ” and the batteries.running, emitted an electric spark, and where the pump could as easily have, been operated with the switch located elsewhere and some distance from the pump and the tank, and where gasoline, with the defendant’s knowledge, had escaped and covered the pump and the surrounding ground and also saturated the clothes of a bystander, who was a minor employee of the defendant, the question of defendant’s negligence in maintaining the switch so located and in shutting off the electric current by means of the switch under such circumstances, thus generating an electric spark which set fire to the escaped gasoline and the saturated clothes of the deceased, causing the latter to sustain burns from which he died, was one for the jury.

2. Where the relation of master and servant existed between the defendant and the deceased, it was, under the above-stated facts, a question for the jury whether or not the defendant, who was the master, ought to have *258known of the alleged defect in the location and construction of the switch and the danger incident thereto.

Decided May 5, 1920.

Action for damages; from city court of Floyd county-—-Judge Nunnally. June 5, 1919.

*Harris & Harris,*for plaintiff.

*J. P. Jones, E. V. Carter,*for defendant.

3. It can not as a matter of law be held that the deceased, who was a minor 15 years of age and employed by the defendant generally about his place of business, had equal means with the master of knowing the danger of igniting the escaped gasoline upon shutting off the switch under such circumstances, or by the exercise of ordinary care could have known of such danger.

4. Although the gasoline may have escaped through the negligence of the deceased in improperly operating the pump, the question of proximate cause was one for the jury.

5. The evidence otherwise making a prima facie case for the plaintiff, who was the father of the deceased, suing for the homicide of his minor son, the judge erred in granting a nonsuit.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 486

To require the Food and Drug Administration to establish restrictions regarding the qualifications of physicians to prescribe the abortion drug commonly known as RU–486. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2003

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To require the Food and Drug Administration to establish 

restrictions regarding the qualifications of physicians to 

prescribe the abortion drug commonly known as RU–

486.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘RU–486 Patient 

5 Health and Safety Protection Act’’. 
2

•HR 486 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF RESTRICTIONS REGARDING 

2 PRESCRIBING OF CERTAIN ABORTION DRUG. 

3 With respect to the application that was submitted 

4 under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos5 metic Act for the drug mifepristone (commonly referred 

6 to as RU–486, marketed as MIFEPREX), and that was 

7 approved on September 28, 2000, the Secretary of Health 

8 and Human Services, acting through the Commissioner of 

9 Food and Drugs, shall promptly modify the conditions of 

10 the approval of such drug to establish the additional re11 striction that the drug may not be prescribed by any per12 son other than a licensed physician who meets the fol13 lowing requirements: 

14 (1) The physician is qualified to handle com15 plications resulting from an incomplete abortion or 

16 ectopic pregnancy. 

17 (2) The physician has been trained to perform 

18 surgical abortions and has met all applicable legal 

19 requirements to perform such abortions. 

20 (3) The physician is certified for ultrasound 

21 dating of pregnancy and detecting ectopic preg22 nancy. 

23 (4) The physician has completed a program re24 garding the prescribing of such drug that uses a 

25 curriculum approved by the Secretary. 
3

•HR 486 IH 

1 (5) The physician has admitting privileges at a 

2 hospital to which the physician can travel in one 

3 hour or less, determined on the basis of starting at 

4 the principal medical office of the physician and 

5 traveling to the hospital, using the transportation 

6 means normally used by the physician to travel to 

7 the hospital, and under the average conditions of 

8 travel for the physician.

Æ
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4778 

For the relief of Denes and Gyorgyi Fulop. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 7, 2004 

Mr. LANTOS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Denes and Gyorgyi Fulop. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR DENES 

4 AND GYORGYI FULOP. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Denes and Gyorgyi Fulop shall be eligible for 

8 issuance of immigrant visas or for adjustment of status 

9 to that of aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence 

10 upon filing an application for issuance of immigrant visas 

11 under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status 

12 to lawful permanent resident. 
2 

•HR 4778 IH 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Denes Fulop or 

2 Gyorgyi Fulop enters the United States before the filing 

3 deadline specified in subsection (c), the alien shall be con4 sidered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, 

5 if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 

6 under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

7 as of the date of enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of immigrant visas or the application 

11 for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

14 Upon the granting of immigrant visas or permanent resi15 dence to Denes and Gyorgyi Fulop, the Secretary of State 

16 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by the appro17 priate number, during the current or next following fiscal 

18 year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 

19 available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth 

20 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

21 Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 

22 that are made available to natives of the country of the 

23 aliens’ birth under section 202(e) of such Act. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 243 (Thursday, December 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 75532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29670]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-86-2014]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 57--Charlotte, North Carolina 
Notification of Proposed Export Production Activity Gildan Yarns, LLC 
(Cotton, Cotton/Polyester Yarns) Salisbury, North Carolina

    The Charlotte Regional Partnership, Inc., grantee of FTZ 57, 
submitted a notification of proposed export production activity to the 
FTZ Board on behalf of Gildan Yarns, LLC (Gildan), located in 
Salisbury, North Carolina. The notification conforming to the 
requirements of the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR 400.22) was 
received on December 8, 2014.
    The Gildan facility is located within Site 19 of FTZ 57. The 
activity at the facility would involve the production of spun cotton 
and cotton/polyester yarns for export (no shipments for U.S. 
consumption would occur). Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ activity 
would be limited to the specific foreign-status materials and 
components and specific finished products described in the submitted 
notification (as described below) and subsequently authorized by the 
FTZ Board.
    Production under FTZ procedures could exempt Gildan from customs 
duty payments on the foreign status material used in export production. 
The sole foreign-origin material to be used in the export production is 
polyester staple fiber (duty rate: 4.3%). Customs duties also could 
possibly be deferred or reduced on foreign status production equipment 
or the foreign material scrapped or destroyed under U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection procedures.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary at the 
address below. The closing period for their receipt is January 27, 
2015.
    A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection 
at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, 
Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230-0002, and in the ``Reading Room'' section of the 
FTZ Board's Web site, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Pierre Duy at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#04546d617676612a40717d4470766560612a636b72"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d0d34382f2f38731928241d292f3c3938733a322b">[email protected]</span></a> 
or (202) 482-1378.

    Dated: December 12, 2014.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29670 Filed 12-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT (23)

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of this Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Numbers 33-57363,
33-53111, 2-97721, 33-9934 and 2-97721) and Form S-8 (Numbers 333-06955, 333-
06963, 33-54377, 33-38033, 33-38032, 33-29149, 2-97721, 2-97131 and 2-82642) of
our report dated February 2, 1998, which appears on page 38 of the 1997 annual
Report to Shareholders of Nalco Chemical Company, which is incorporated by
reference in Nalco Chemical Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report on the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears on page 11 of
this Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement of our report dated March 20, 1998 appearing on page 1
of the Annual Report of the Nalco Chemical Company Profit Sharing, Investment
and Pay Deferral Plan on Form 11-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 27, 1998
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Hunter Ryan Hamilton Woods v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 16

- 00651

- CR

Trial court case number: 1442018

Trial court: 232nd District C ourt of Harris County

Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel

, filed a brief on February 13, 2017, concluding that the above

- referenced appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). Although c ounsel attaches a copy of a letter, dated February 13, 2017, to her Anders brief that appears to comply with Kelly v. State

, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014), and refers to an enclosed motio n to withdraw,

counsel has not, however, filed a motion to withdraw from representation with the Clerk

of this Court

. If appointed counsel believes that an appeal is frivolous, counsel must request permission to withdraw. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744. An Anders brief must accompany a motion to withdraw, neither the brief nor the motion may be filed on its own. See id. ; In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403, 406

– 08 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).

Accordingly, we order appellant’s appointed counsel, Patti Sedita, to file with the

Clerk of this Court within 10 days of the date of this O rder a motion to withdraw that complies with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 6.5 and 9. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 6.5, 9;

Schulman , 252 S.W.3d at 410, 412.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley



Date: F ebruary 16, 2017
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

GERALD HUNDSON, #224330, : 

 Plaintiff, : 

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0721-CG-N 

FAMOUS ABSTON, et al., : 

 Defendants. : 

JUDGMENT 

 It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be and is hereby 

DISMISSED with prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 

DONE and ORDERED this 28th day of July, 2010. 

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:09-cv-00721-CG-N Document 18 Filed 07/28/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.1 - Q1 2015








Exhibit 10.1
    


SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE SPECIAL SEVERANCE PLAN
This second amendment to the AnnTaylor Stores Corporation Special Severance Plan, as amended (the “ASSP”), is adopted effective as of May 19, 2015 by ANN INC. (the “Company”).  
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has decided to amend the ASSP to provide that a participant shall have the right to challenge any final determination by the plan administrator in a court of competent jurisdiction and any such challenge shall be subject to de novo review by the court (the “Second Amendment”); and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has authorized the proper officer of the Company to execute an amendment to the ASSP to provide for the Second Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, the ASSP is hereby amended as follows:
		
	1.
	The following Section 5.10 shall be added to the Plan:


“5.10 Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, on or following a Change in Control, an Employee shall have the right to challenge any determination by the Plan Administrator regarding such Employee’s rights under the Plan in a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction and the Plan Administrator’s determination shall be subject to de novo review. Such de novo standard shall apply notwithstanding the grant of full discretion hereunder to the Plan Administrator or any person or characterization of any decision by the Plan Administrator or by such person as final, binding or conclusive on any party.” 
In all other respects, the ASSP will remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
IT WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed, effective as of May 19, 2015.
ANN INC.
/s/ Katherine H. Ramundo         
Name: Katherine H. Ramundo
Title: Executive Vice President, General 
Counsel and Secretary
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.01

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF NASHUA CORPORATION

DOMESTIC                                                  INCORPORATED

     Nashua International, Inc.  (1)                          Delaware
     Nashua Photo Inc.  (1)                                   Delaware
     Nashua P.R., Inc.  (1)                                   Delaware

FOREIGN                                                   INCORPORATED

     Nashua FSC Limited  (1)(3)                               Jamaica
     Nashua Imaging Supplies (UK) Limited  (2)(3)             England
     Nashua Photo B.V.  (2)(3)                                Netherlands

-------------------

(1)  Stock held by Nashua Corporation

(2)  Stock held by Nashua Photo Inc.

(3)  In liquidation.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Huntsman International LLC (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Kimo Esplin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|/s/J. KIMO ESPLINJ. Kimo Esplin Chief Financial
OfficerMarch 28, 2003 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Huntsman International LLC and will be retained by Huntsman International LLC and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
! " #$%&' !
!
(! )*"*" 


#(+,-,,-+,	+$,$#	,

.


//////////"//////////

#

"0
















$"
(1

#(1


*2 0
1


!
 "0

2 0
1

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

#30 .


 .

.
4 
 !"" .
  
#$

%&'
 .

003"0
03"
)"
 
*
"


.."

" )"
5 
*6)

*7

0


)6.
#

"

$00""3 " #$

%88 9."

" .09: .
3*6"
0
"
.#;%4


.
"

""
.#$%&''&9.

<
..
6
33*)*
9

IT IS ORDERED..
0"1

-(+- ;	(,-.


="3
 "*603"
"


03"0
(as reflected in 

the last judgment issued)  0."is reduced to 

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

-<
3".
7"
3
9**3"".
> 0

 ".**
0



IT IS SO ORDERED



1

Judge’s signature

-


1

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

 Southern District of Alabama

HUBERT RIVAS-GRANADOS 11-00152-002

33951-379

11-20-2013

Pro Se

✔

✔

324 262 months

11-20-2013

06-05-2015

11-01-2015 United States District Judge

Callie V.S. Granade 

U.S. District Judge

Digitally signed by Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge 

DN: cn=Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge, o=U.S. 

Government, ou=Federal Judiciary, 

email=efile_granade@alsd.uscourts.gov, c=US 

Date: 2015.05.20 11:37:43 -06'00'

Case 1:11-cr-00152-TFM-C Document 564 Filed 06/05/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

<pageID>
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 4, 2014

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00129-CV

VALAIDA TARRY, Appellant

V.

MEMORIAL HERMANN HOSPITAL, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1029117

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed November 1, 2013. The clerk’s 

record was filed May 28, 2014. No reporter’s record was taken. No brief was 

filed.

On July 22, 2014, this court issued an order stating that unless appellant 

submitted a brief, together with a motion reasonably explaining why the brief was 
2

late, on or before, August 21, 2014, the court would dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

Appellant filed no response. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Busby.