alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit10.15**

 

**Gaiam,Inc.**

**NonemployeeDirector Compensation**

 
| **Event**                              | ** ** | **Compensation**   | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|------------|
| Meeting Fee                            |       | $3,000 per meeting |       |
|                                   |       |               |       |
| Telephonic Meeting Fee                 |       | $1,000 per meeting |       |
|                                   |       |               |       |
| Committee Meeting Fee                  |       | $500 per meeting   |       |
|                                   |       |               |       |
| Committee Telephonic Meeting Fee       |       | $250 per meeting   |       |
|                                   |       |               |       |
| Standing Committee Chairman’s Fee |       | $2,000 annually    |       |

 

----
EX-10.2









Exhibit 10.2 



AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT



         This
 Amendment  to  Agreement  (“Amendment”)  is  made  and  entered  into on the
___  day of  December,  2005,  between ________________________________  (“the
 Associate”),  and Wal-Mart  Stores,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation,  and its
 affiliates  and subsidiaries (collectively “Wal-Mart”). 




         WHEREAS,
The Associate and Wal-Mart have entered into an agreement concerning, among other
things, restrictions on the Associate’s employment after terminating from employment
with Wal-Mart (the “Transition Agreement”); and  




         WHEREAS,
by this Amendment the Associate and Wal-Mart wish to amend certain provisions of the
Transition Agreement relating to post-employment payments by Wal-Mart to the Associate;  




         NOW
THEREFORE, for good and sufficient consideration, the sufficiency of which the
parties acknowledge, the parties agree as follows:  




	 	 1.  	Transition
Payments. The Associate and Wal-Mart agree that the existing language in the
Transition Agreement concerning the timing of post-employment payments
shall be superseded by the following language: 







	 	
The
Associate will receive Transition Payments based on the Associate’s base salary on
the date of termination (the “Salary”). The first Transition Payment shall be
an amount equal to six months’ Salary, less applicable withholding, and shall be
paid on the date of termination or as soon thereafter as practical. Subsequent Transition
Payments shall commence at the end of the regularly scheduled pay period six months after
the date of termination, and each such payment shall be an amount equal to the Associate’s
biweekly Salary payment, less applicable withholding, which will continue for the
period set forth in the Transition Agreement.  







APPROVED AND
AGREED:


	___________________________________	

      WAL-MART STORES, INC. 

      

      

      By________________________________
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 3, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1489

Lower Tribunal No. 92-12914A

________________

Edwin Alexander Whitehead,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Tanya Brinkley, Judge.

Edwin Alexander Whitehead, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                   EXHIBIT 32.1 -- SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Richard L. Wambold, certify that:

     (1) the Form 10-K/A of Pactiv Corporation for the period ended December 31,
         2003, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of sec.13(a)
         or sec.15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Pactiv Corporation for the period then ended.

/s/ RICHARD L. WAMBOLD
------------------------------------------------------
Richard L. Wambold
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

March 16, 2004
------------------------------------------------------
Date

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
A Study on Accuracy and Problems in using 

ISO/IEC 19794-2 Finger Minutiae Formats 

for Automated Fingerprint Verification 

Takahiro YOSHIDA , Seiichiro HANGAI

 Tokyo University of Science (JAPAN) 
ISO 

MINDTCT 

+ 

Verify 

Probe 

Reference 

Gallery 

Score 

BOZORTH3 

ISO ISO 

Conversion Conversion 

+ 

MINDTCT 

+ 

Conversion 

MINDTCT 

Verify 

.XYT 

(Minutiae Detection) 

MINDTCT 

Probe 

Reference 

.XYT 

BOZORTH3 

(Minutiae Data) (Matching)

.XYT 

Gallery 

Score 

ISO/IEC19794-2 Compatible 

(RF, CF-N, CF-C)

 ? 

Degradation(RF) 

Degradation(CF-N) 

Degradation(CF-C) 

Record Format = 0.1% 

Card Format (Normal size) = 0.1% 

Card Format (Compact size) = 0.77% 

EER Degradation NIST 

Special 

DB 9 

2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 Netegrity, Inc.

                            Certification Pursuant To
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Netegrity, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Barry N. Bycoff, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  July 28, 2003                     /s/ Barry N. Bycoff
                                         _______________________________________
                                         Barry N. Bycoff
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Netegrity, Inc. and will be
retained by Netegrity, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT**

**TO      18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**BioLok      International Inc.**

| a)     | The Report fully complies                  with the                  requirements of Section  13(a)                   or                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                                                                                  |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| b)     | The information contained                  in the                  Report fairly presents, in all  material                  respects, the financial condition and results of  operations                  of the Registrant as of the dates and the periods  expressed                  in the Report. |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |

**Bio-Lok      International Inc.**

----
Code of Virginia 

Title 3.2. Agriculture, Animal Care, and Food 

Subtitle IV. Food and Drink; Weights and Measures 

Chapter 56. Weights and Measures 

§ 3.2-5627. Pricing of retail merchandise 

A. In a point-of-sale system the selling price of a consumer item displayed or offered for sale at 

retail shall be clearly and conspicuously indicated in Arabic numerals, so as to be readable and 

understandable by visual inspection, and shall be stamped upon or affixed to the consumer item 

or posted at or adjacent to the display. 

The provisions of this section shall not apply to: (i) greeting cards sold individually that have a 

code price, readable and understandable by visual inspection, on the back of the card; or (ii) 

merchandise ordered as a gift by a consumer that is sent by mail or other delivery service to a 

person other than the consumer by the retailer at the request of the consumer. 

B. Any person who knowingly violates the provisions of this section is guilty of a Class 4 

misdemeanor. 

1991, c. 605, § 3.1-949.1; 1993, c. 604; 2008, c. 860. 

The chapters of the acts of assembly referenced in the historical citation at the end of this 

section(s) may not constitute a comprehensive list of such chapters and may exclude chapters 

whose provisions have expired. 

1 3/31/2022 12:00:00
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23

                             CONSENT OF ACCOUNTANTS

<PAGE>

                               [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG]

                         Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Webster City Federal Bancorp:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-48334 on Form S-8 of Webster City Federal Bancorp of our report dated
January 16, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Webster City
Federal Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2003 which report appears in the December
31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Webster City Federal Bancorp.


                                   /s/ KPMG LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
March 29, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHARNETTA RANKINS o/b/o :

CABRIA B. RANKINS,

:

Plaintiff,

vs. : CA 05-0704-WS-C

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, :

Commissioner of Social Security,

:

Defendant.

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED,

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security

denying child’s insurance benefits to Cabria Rankins be affirmed. 

DONE and ORDERED this 31st day of August, 2006.

 s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00704-WS-C Document 19 Filed 08/31/06 Page 1 of 1
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MAR I A D E L S AG R AR I O ME Z AL OR E T O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 72168 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 663- 525 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry21, 2012 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , M cK E O W N , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M a r i aD e l S a gr a r i o M e z a - L or e t o, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng her ap p e a l f r o m an i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s d e c i s i o n d e n y i n g h e rap p l i c a t i o n f o ra s y l u m, 

# FI LED MA R 02 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 72168 2 w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l, an dr e lie f

u n d e rth e C o n v e n tio n A g a in s t T o rtu r e ( “C A T ” ) . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence th e ag en cy’ s factu al fi n d i n g s an drev i ew d e n o v o i t s l eg al co n cl u si o n s. B e n y a m in v. H older , 5 7 9 F . 3 d9 7 0 , 9 7 4 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 9 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. M e z a - L or e t o doe s notc ont e nd s he s uf f e r e d pa s tpe r s e c ut i on i n M e xi c o. S ub st an t i al ev i d en ce sup p o rt s th e B IA ’ s fi n d i n g th at , ev en i f M eza-L o ret o i s a m e m be rof

apa rt i c ul a rs oc i a l gr oup, he rf e a rof f utur e pe r s e c ut i on i s not o b je c tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le . Se e Na g o u lko v . I NS , 333 F . 3d 1012, 1018 ( 9th C i r . 2003) (f ear of f uture pers ec ut i on t oo spec ul at i ve). In addi t i on , M ez a- L oret o’ s c l ai m that s h e f e a r s p e r s e c u tio n in P a k is tan f a ils b e c au s e th a t is n o t h e rc o u n tryo f n a tio n a lity . See 8 U . S . C . § 1 10 1(a) (42)(A ). B e c aus e M e z a - L or e t o f a i l e d t o m e e the rbur de n t o e s t abl i s h e l i gi bi l i tyf or a s y l um , s he ne c e s s a r i l yf a i l s t o s a t i s f

ythe m or e s tr i nge nts t a nda r d f orw i thhol di ng o f r e m o v a l. See Zehat

ye v. G on zales , 45 3 F . 3d 11 82 , 11 90 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). F i nal l y, subst ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the B IA ’ s deni alof C A T re l i ef be c aus e M e z a - L or e t o f

a i l e d t o de m ons tr a t e tha ti ti s m or e l i ke l ytha n nottha ts he w o u ldf a c e to rtu r e if

r e tu rn e dto M e x ic o . See Si laya v. Mukasey , 524 F . 3d 1066, 10 73 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                                     <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    YEAR                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-08-1998             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,744,000              60,469,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  537,000              14,891,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,495,000              77,063,000
<PP&E>                                       3,500,000              97,087,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                (59,000)             (4,215,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,042,000             182,987,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,272,000              52,987,000
<BONDS>                                              0              79,922,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 13,188,000             113,469,000
<COMMON>                                       737,000              30,065,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,155,000)            (94,425,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,042,000             182,097,000
<SALES>                                              0               2,985,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0               2,985,000
<CGS>                                                0               2,407,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,103,000              45,419,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0               3,621,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0               8,604,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,092,000)            (48,344,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,092,000)            (48,344,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,092,000)            (48,344,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1,940)                 (6,908)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1,940)                 (6,908)


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MARIO ANDJUAN PEEPLES, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) Civil Action 09-0614-KD-N

MOBILE COUNTY SHERIFF’S )

DEPARTMENT, 

Respondent. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the

issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated December 10, 2009 is ADOPTED as the

opinion of this Court. The undersigned also finds that there are no grounds to appeal this

determination. 

DONE this 7th day of January, 2010.

s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00614-KD-N Document 4 Filed 01/08/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


	In connection with the Annual Report of BF Acquisition Group I,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, William Colucci, Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: January 22, 2004

                                           /s/ William Colucci
                                    ---------------------------------
                                    William Colucci, Treasurer
                                    BF Acquisition Group I, Inc.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the
Annual Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Darrell B. Lee, Chief Financial Officer of MOCON, Inc.,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my
knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MOCON, Inc.   Date:
  March 31, 2009/s/
  Darrell B. LeeDarrell
  B. LeeChief
  Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT32.1***

 

SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONSCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CaliforniaCoastal Communities, Inc. (the  “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Raymond J. Pacini, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:   November 13, 2003 | */s/  Raymond J. Pacini* |   |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                            | Raymond J. Pacini        |
|                            | Chief Executive Officer  |

 

 

----

*       In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32),the above certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and(B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing underthe Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, except to the extent that the Company explicitly incorporates it byreference in any such filing.

 

----