alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United Realty Trust Incorporated 10-Q


 


Exhibit 10.22


DEMAND NOTE




 







 


This Demand Note Payable on Demand
(the “Note”) is made and effective March 31, 2015,


	BETWEEN:	United Realty Trust Incorporated (the “Lender”), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland, with its head office located at:
	 	 
	 	60 Broad Street, 34th Floor, New York, New York 10004
	 	 
	 	 
	AND:	United Realty Advisors, LP (the “Borrower”), a limited partnership organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its head office located at:
	 	 
	 	60 Broad Street, 34th Floor, New York, New York 10004


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned
Borrower promises to pay to the order of Lender the sum of Five Million Three Hundred Thirty Two Thousand Three Hundred Twenty
Six and No/100 Dollars ($5,332,326.00), together with interest of one and one-half percent (1.5%) per annum on the unpaid balance.
The entire principal and any accrued interest shall be fully and immediately payable UPON DEMAND of Lender thereof.


Upon default in making payment
within seven (7) days of demand, and providing this note is turned over for collection, Borrower agrees to pay all reasonable legal
fees and costs of collection to the extent permitted by law. This note shall take effect as a sealed instrument and be enforced
in accordance with the laws of the state of New York. All parties to this note waive presentment, notice of non-payment, protest
and notice of protest, and agree to remain fully bound notwithstanding the release of any party, extension or modification of terms,
or discharge of any collateral for this note.


 


[Signature to follow]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
has caused this Demand Note to be duly executed as of the date first written above.


	 	BORROWER:
	 	 
	 	United Realty Advisors, LP, 
	 	a Delaware limited partnership
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	Jacob Frydman
	 	 	Name: 	Jacob Frydman
	 	 	Title:	Authorized Signatory
	 	 	 


 


 


	STATE OF NEW YORK	)
	 	) ss.:
	COUNTY OF NEW YORK	)


 


 


On the 31st day of March,
2015, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Jacob Frydman, personally known to
me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the within
instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the
instrument, the individual(s), or the person upon behalf of which the individual(s) acted, executed the instrument.


 


	 	Alex Libin
	 
	Notary Public
#### David M. GIBA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John KITZHABER, Governor State of Oregon; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-35196.

D.C. No. CV-98-01034-HO.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2001.*

Decided June 1, 2001.

Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

David M. Giba appeals pro se the district court’s grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review for abuse of discretion a denial of a motion for appointment of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. *Rand v. Rowland,*113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir.1997). We also review for abuse of discretion discovery rulings. *Klingele v. Eikenberry,*849 F.2d 409, 412 (9th Cir.1988).

Because Giba failed to demonstrate the exceptional circumstances necessary for appointment of counsel in a section 1983 action, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion. *Rand,*113 F.3d at 1525.

The district court likewise did not abuse its discretion when it denied plaintiffs discovery motions and final motion for extension of time. None of the information plaintiff hoped to discover would have raised an issue of material fact sufficient to prevent summary judgment. The district court had previously accommodated Giba’s requests for more time and allowed plaintiff an additional 60 days to file responses to defendants’ motions for summary judgment and partial judgment on the pleadings. There was no error.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by summarily granting defendants’ motion to copy Giba’s medical records. The motion was made in response to plaintiffs request for production of his own medical and mental health records.

To the extent Giba contends the district court erred by granting summary judgment for defendants, we review the grant *606of summary judgment de novo. *Weiner v. San Diego County,*210 F.3d 1025, 1028 (9th Cir.2000). Giba presented no evidence that a genuine issue of material fact was in dispute. The evidence supports the district court’s conclusion that Giba was not denied due process during his prison disciplinary hearing. *Wolff v. McDonnell,*418 U.S. 539, 558-66, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974). Therefore, the grant of summary judgment for defendants was proper.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[Exhibit 32.2]

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of BF Acquisition Group
III, Inc.  (the "Company") on  Form 10-KSB for the period  ending
April  30,  2001  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Colucci,
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and
          (2)  The  information contained in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 16, 2004

                                 /s/ William Colucci
                                 -------------------------------
                                 William Colucci, Treasurer
                                 BF Acquisition Group II, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Activeworlds Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Sean
Deson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                           /s/ Sean Deson
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Sean Deson,
                                           Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                           Financial Officer

Date:  May 18, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Mylan Laboratories Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period[s] presented in this
report.
  /s/ Robert J. CouryRobert J. CouryChief Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 24.1
  DIRECTORS AND
    CERTAIN OFFICERS OF
    NATIONAL CITY CORPORATION
  ANNUAL REPORT ON
    FORM 10-K
  POWER OF
    ATTORNEY
  Form 10-K Form 10-K,
    /s/  Jon
    E. BarfieldJon
    E. Barfield

Director/s/  James
    S.
    BroadhurstJames
    S. Broadhurst

Director/s/  Christopher
    M. ConnorChristopher
    M. Connor

Director/s/  David
    A. DaberkoDavid
    A. Daberko

Chairman of the Board and Chief
    Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)/s/  Bernadine
    P.
    Healy, M.D.Bernadine
    P. Healy, M.D.

Director/s/  S.
    Craig
    LindnerS.
    Craig Lindner

Director/s/  Michael
    B.
    McCallisterMichael
    B. McCallister

Director/s/  Paul
    A. OrmondPaul
    A. Ormond

Director/s/  Peter
    E. RaskindPeter
    E. Raskind

Director and President/s/  Gerald
    L. ShaheenGerald
    L. Shaheen

Director/s/  Jerry
    Sue Thornton,
    Ph.D.Jerry
    Sue Thornton, Ph.D.

Director/s/  Morry
    WeissMorry
    Weiss

Director
United States Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

West Virginia

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international 

system of units (SI), documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, documented calibration intervals, submitted a quality management system, and demonstrated 

suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope

(Rev.: September 2021)

Mass Echelon III

25 kg to 1 mg

1000 lb to 0.001 lb

4 oz to 0.03125 oz

Weight Carts/Railroad Carts

6000 lb to 3000 lb

6000 lb

Volume Transfer, II

1000 gal to 5 gal

Volume Transfer, II LPG

100 gal to 25 gal

2023

____________________________________

Katrice Lippa, Chief

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

Effective Dates: 2023-02-01 to 2024-02-01
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NATHAN CURTIS, )

)

Petitioner, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0379-CG-M

)

vs. ) CRIMINAL NO. 12-00287-CG-M

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Respondent. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having 

been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate (Doc. 29) be DENIED

and that this action be DISMISSED. It is further ORDERED that any certificate 

of appealablity filed by Petitioner be DENIED as he is not entitled to appeal in

forma pauperis.

DONE and ORDERED this 19th day of February, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cr-00287-CG-M Document 36 Filed 02/19/15 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-12-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-12-1999
<CASH>                                           4,991
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                20,275
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      9,424
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          11,245
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            11,093
<LOANS>                                         82,632
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,237
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,811
<DEPOSITS>                                     114,028
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                557
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,160
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,923)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 132,811
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,191
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  693
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   777
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,661
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,453
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,454
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,207
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      325
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,948
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    507
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         507
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       507
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   0.073
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   914
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        2
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,237
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,154
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             83




</TABLE>
#### City of Louisville *v.*Joseph Hall, et al.

Dedication of Highway — Streets.

When grantors own land not platted, and convey the same as a tract, referring in the deed to a named street and to the location of portions of the land on either side of such street, hut not making the street a boundary, they do not thereby dedicate the street to the public. The reference to the street in the deed was a mere matter of description.

APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

January 22, 1875.

OpiNion by

Judge Lindsay:

It does not appear from the record that Elm street had been laid out by the heirs at law of Ferguson, nor that it had been located across their lands, with their consent, by the city or by any adjoining land holder.

*328
      *T. L. Burnett, for appellant.*

*Russell & Helm, for appellees.*

They sold to the Halls an entire tract of land, describing it as the land conveyed to their ancestor by the Bank of the United States. The reference to Elm street, and to the location of portions of the land conveyed on either side of said street, was mere matter of description. In selling to the Halls, the vendees had no interest in dedicating a street to the public, and the purchasers had no interest in requiring any such dedication.

If they had conveyed the land lying north of the supposed location of Elm street to one party, and that lying south to another, calling in the deeds for the street as a boundary to each tract, then the title to the street could not have been passed, and the law, for the benefit of the purchaser, would have implied a. dedication of the street to the public.

In this case the title to all the tract of land, including the proposed site of Elm street, passed to the Halls, and their right to the street is as free from the supposed divestiture by dedication, as was that of the vendors.

Judgment *affirmed.*
-^ /0/-.3/^;/-S -ZfL_Cour-r oF ftyp>E*ls fl^j]fl t- FILED IN hppcdl A wT- • RTQFCR|M1NALAPPEALS "TV^e "5Htc oF i£vw FEB i023'.5 Abel Acosta, Clerk 

### flpp4l oFdAse poim'feeRJA2/^J£1 /from 

### -toe /^— UCcdlClAl 'b^tFt/rt- ^urToF M9£#,X S ^OCuty FksI^ f^ctrbr^ For Fvrfeo^io^ of TTcoe "te R (e fl^EllfiKrtS" *7fo ^>e ^TSrieF OT^RcspoAjSe f* ft/u dens T><r »eF 3e3 AKjd<rRe3pec"tfuUY moves ffrc- £occft~ *to e^cte^c/ "tW 

### deadline- fi>r Fil»u^ h\s*T3neF Gv-Rcspo^se)^By (3cD XI 

## D^4^97-£()l3 Abo 3ccry (br^Tc^-e) foe**^ PppelUMtr <5xiVhjr r>F fe/()v] (/ poSSteSi&n LO) H)

### *By rnR///-^Wt~" his fHfoc^ey fftppe*/) fi/ee'- A^d AWeo f+ ^i^ftf "to RIe A'"pro "^eTjcicF or^RespOAiSf- ~ttr "the. 

### QeOVih.b^AdlS -the. AppelIRkT?ccW ujc&

f7rSl~~ ro^cU PUft/telSA-. -k> ftj^eJH^Aftr- /he Tjgftf//^*. Rir 

### FTliu^ B^peilftA^^BTjer c-'"KeSpoM3c 03 <3V- ^- <2<VS %>>e(t-&jt~ is MM^Ble ~fcr m<«<rt—the iDf-ad/'/^ XT,^, /t«tt^/ ,/jE3ftI KmOuJ)edj C ,"7^5rclBy "^>loco )Kj* X>)cu> aJ 

### Rx -tht^cci^oioi -stated -frBovjE, ft^^llM3^^e^ec^/y TZL
#### Isaac Patterson, et al., *v.*David C. Snyder.

Mental Capacity — Character of Witness to Will.

In an attack upon the mental capacity of a testatrix it is not sufficient to show merely that she was a person of naturally low order of intellect.

Moral Character of Witness.

The moral character of a witness to a will is not in issue when the witness is not called in a trial to contest the will.

*42APPEAL FROM HANCOCK CIRCUIT COURT.

September 12, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The refusal of the court to allow the witness, Stone, to answer the question relative to the moral character of Miller, one of the subscribing witnesses to the will, is not a ground for reversal. Miller had not then been called as a witness; and at the time the question was asked, there was certainly nothing in the case involving Miller’s moral character.

The proof does not, in our opinion, show that the testatrix was incapable of disposing of her property by last will, at the time the paper in contest was executed. Almost every witness called testifies to facts tending to rebut any such assumption. Stone, who was certainly disinterested, entertained no doubt as to her capacity; and the other persons who were present at the time of the execution of the paper concur with him in every material statement.

Her capacity cannot be questioned on account of her naturally low order of intellect. She had always managed her own affairs, and had transacted business with nearly, if not quite, all of those who speak on this subject; and yet the testimony as to this point constitutes nearly the whole ground upon which appellants seek to show want of testamentary capacity.

There is little or no proof as to undue influence. We cannot surmise that the will was the result of a combination between Mrs. Snyder, Mrs. Miller and John E. Miller. Except the fact that the two Millers were present, and that John E. had sent for Stone to write the will, there is absolutely nothing in the record upon which to base even a suspicion of any such combination.

The disposition of the estate devised was neither unnatural nor unreasonable. The testimony tends to show that those closely related to the testatrix had no special claims upon her, and that during the ten years preceding her death she had lived with strangers, and distant relatives. The party to whom she devised her estate, was one of those with whom she occasionally resided, and whose family nursed and cared for her in her last illness.

We do not deem it necessary to inquire into the propriety of the action of the court in giving instructions. The verdict of the jury accords with the decided preponderance of the testimony, and the *43judgment must therefore be *affirmed.*Judge Cofer did not sit in this case.

*Williams & Baker, for appellants.*

*R. Y. Bush, Eli H. Brown, for appellee.*
Extraordinary optical transmission revisited: how light gets through isolated or periodic arrays of 

subwavelength slits and holes (or not)

John Weiner

NIST/CNST

Gaithersburg, MD USA

The passage of light through apertures much smaller than the wavelength of the light has proved to be a 

surprisingly subtle phenomenon. This talk describes how modern developments in nanofabrication, 

coherent light sources and numerical vector field simulations have led to the upending of early predictions 

from scalar diffraction theory and classical electrodynamics. Optical response of real materials to incident 

coherent radiation at petahertz frequencies leads to unexpected consequences for transmission (and 

extinction) of light through subwavelength aperture arrays.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1511 

To amend section 249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to render 

available to certain long-term residents of the United States the benefit 

under that section. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2023 

Ms. LOFGREN (for herself, Mrs. TORRES of California, Ms. MENG, Mr. 

CORREA, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Ms. 

NORTON, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. GARCIA of Texas, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. 

PANETTA, Mr. GOMEZ, Mr. NADLER, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Ms. ROSS, Ms. JAYAPAL, Mr. PAYNE, Ms. 

BARRAGA ́N, Mr. LIEU, Ms. BUSH, Mr. VARGAS, Ms. LEE of California, 

Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. SALINAS, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Ms. OMAR, 

Mr. SOTO, Ms. JACOBS, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Mr. 

TRONE, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. TLAIB, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. MOORE of 

Wisconsin, Ms. CHU, Mr. BOWMAN, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. SCANLON, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mrs. RAMIREZ, Ms. KAMLAGER-DOVE, Ms. 

DEGETTE, Mr. ROBERT GARCIA of California, Ms. TOKUDA, and Mr. 

CASAR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 249 of the Immigration and Nationality 

Act to render available to certain long-term residents 

of the United States the benefit under that section. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1511 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Renewing Immigration 

3 Provisions of the Immigration Act of 1929’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REGISTRY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 249 of the Immigration 

6 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1259) is amended— 

7 (1) in the section header, by striking ‘‘EN8 TERED THE UNITED STATES PRIOR TO JULY 1, 1924

9 OR JANUARY 1, 1972’’; and inserting ‘‘ARE LONG10 TERM RESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES’’; and 

11 (2) by amending subsection (a) to read as fol12 lows: 

13 ‘‘(a) entered the United States at least 7 years before 

14 the application date;’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall take effect 60 days after the date of the 

17 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS