alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.36

FIRST AMENDMENT  TO  HUNTSMAN OUTSIDE DIRECTORS ELECTIVE DEFERRAL PLAN

This First Amendment to the HUNTSMAN OUTSIDE DIRECTORS ELECTIVE DEFERRAL PLAN (the "Plan") is entered into this 28 day of April, 2006.

WHEREAS,
Huntsman Corporation (the "Company") has adopted the Plan and desires to amend it to clarify the limitations on changes in the form of payment in compliance with the proposed
regulations issued under Section 409A of the Code.

NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1.Effective January 1, 2006, Section 6.3 of the Plan is restated to read as follows:



2.Except as expressly amended by this First Amendment, the terms of the Plan as existing immediately prior to this amendment
shall remain in full force and effect.

DATED
the day and year first above written.

| |  | HUNTSMAN CORPORATION
| |  | --------------------
| |  | By:                 
| |  | Name:               
| |  | Title:              

---



QuickLinks
Converted by EDGARwiz


EX-4.1 4 ex4samplestockcert.htm SAMPLE STOCK CERTIFICATE

Number

Shares

  xx

  xx




Incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada

The Virtual Learning Company, Inc.

Total Authorized Issue

75,000,000 Shares $.001 Par Value

Common Stock




THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH STOCKHOLDER WHO SO REQUESTS THE POWER, DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE, PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL OR OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH CLASS OF STOCK OR SERIES THEREOF AND THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH PREFERENCES AND/OR RIGHTS. ANY SUCH REQUEST SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO THE SECRETARY OF THE CORPORATION.




This is to certify that ________________________________________ is the owner of

___________________________________________________________ fully paid and

non-assessable shares of the above Corporation transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder thereof in person or by a duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed.

Witness, the seal of the corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized officers.

Dated




______________________

________________________

                                                           President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           250
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,898
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,148
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 FOR USA INTERNATIONAL
CHEMICAL, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,165
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                     284,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,165
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,077)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,077)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gaiam, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yudhister Bahl, Chief Financial Officer of Gaiam, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/
Yudhister Bahl

Yudhister
Bahl
Chief Financial Officer
March 10, 2003



QuickLinks
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Devan EDWARDS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-7758.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 30, 2001.

Decided May 14, 2001.

*117Donald Devan Edwards, pro se.

Kenneth Davis Bell, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, NC, for appellee.

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Donald Devan Edwards seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). Finding no reversible error, we dismiss.

We conclude Edwards fails to establish he received ineffective assistance of counsel in relation to his guilty plea or in relation to the filing of an appeal. *See Hill v. Lockhart,*474 U.S. 52, 106 S.Ct. 366, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985); *Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Further, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to permit Edwards to amend his complaint. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 15(a); *Foman v. Davis,*371 U.S. 178, 182, 83 S.Ct. 227, 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962). Finally, because Edwards’ claim alleging his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by not informing him of the possible sentence he faced is now raised for the first time on appeal, we decline to address that issue. *See Muth v. United States,*1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabihty and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Edwards’ motion for issuance of a subpoena. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The following schedule contains summarized financial information extracted
from the Questar Gas Company Statements of Income and Balance Sheets for
the period ended December 31, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such audited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,708
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,098
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,680
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,086
<PP&E>                                       1,013,599
<DEPRECIATION>                                 421,111
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 723,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          148,422
<BONDS>                                        225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,974
<OTHER-SE>                                     240,419
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   723,552
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               449,937
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  360,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,051
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,062
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,231
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,012
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,219
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,219
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 29, 2010

y0125 

# Order

January 29, 2010

139215(43)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139215 COA: 284097 Oakland CC: 2007-215314-FH MONTE ALEXANDER STITT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for r econsideration of this Court’s October 26, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 147 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 147

 To provide that professional baseball teams, and leagues composed of 
          such teams, shall be subject to the antitrust laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

 Mr. Duncan (for himself, Mr. Biggs, and Mr. Bishop of North Carolina) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide that professional baseball teams, and leagues composed of 
          such teams, shall be subject to the antitrust laws.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Teddy Roosevelt Fair Competition and 
Public Trust Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. FINDING.

    The Congress finds that the business of providing for profit public 
baseball games between teams of professional baseball players in a 
league and between such teams of rival leagues is in, or affects, 
interstate commerce.

SEC. 3. APPLICATION OF ANTITRUST LAWS TO PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL.

    The antitrust laws shall apply to the business of providing for 
profit public baseball games between teams of professional baseball 
players and to leagues composed of teams of professional baseball 
players.

SEC. 4. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``antitrust laws'' has the 
meaning given it in subsection (a) of the first section of the Clayton 
Act (15 U.S.C. 12(a)), except that such term includes section 5 of the 
Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45) to the extent that such 
section 5 relates to unfair methods of competition.

SEC. 5. APPLICATION OF SECTION 3.

    Section 3 shall not apply with respect to conduct occurring before 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
11425.

#### Alexander *v.*The State.

Decided June 15, 1920.

Luke, J.

The evidence in this case authorized the conviction of the defendant, who was charged with carrying a pistol without a license; and it was not error to overrule and deny his petition for certiorari. See *Cheney*v. *State, 10 Ga. App. 451 (73*S. E. 607) ; *Green*v. *State,*23 *Ga. App.*519 (98 S. E. 553).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*

*389Certiorari; from Putnam superior court — Judge Park. March 17, 1920.

Sidney Alexander was convicted in Putnam county court of tbe offense of carrying a pistol without a license. From the petition for certiorari it appears, that it was testified that the defendant had a pistol in his hand at the house of Daisy Lawson, and it went off and shot the lamp out, and, when the shot was made, Alonza Alexander, who had come with him to the house, grabbed the pistol and ran off with it, and the defendant remained at the house. The witnesses did not know who owned the pistol or who brought it to the house. The defendant, in his statement at the trial, said that the pistol did not belong to him and that it was brought to Daisy Lawson’s house by Alonza Alexander; that when they got to the house Alonza took it out of his (Alonza’s) pocket and tried to sell it to him, and he (the defendant) was merely looking at it when it went off and shot out the lamp, and Alonza grabbed it and ran off. The judge’s answer to the certiorari states, that the evidence is correctly set forth in the petition except that one of the witnesses testified that he saw Alonza, not at Daisy Lawson’s house, but up town, try'to sell the pistol to Sidney Alexander; and no witness testified that at Daisy Lawson’s house the defendant and Alonza were talking about a trade for the pistol. The petitioner alleged: that the judgment was contrary to law and to the evidence and without evidence to support it; that there was no evidence that he had the pistol with intent to carry it to some other place than that at which the manual possession began, and that the only evidence was that he had it in his possession for the purpose of examination; citing 12 *Ga. App.*427.

*R. C. Jenkins,*for plaintiff in error.

*Doyle Campbell, solicitor-general,*contra.
Presidential Documents

73459 

Federal Register 

Vol. 79, No. 237 

Wednesday, December 10, 2014 

Title 3— 

The President 

Executive Order 13682 of December 5, 2014 

Closing of Executive Departments and Agencies of the Federal Government on Friday, December 26, 2014 

By the authority vested in me as President of the United States of America, 

by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, it is hereby ordered 

as follows: 

Section 1. All executive branch departments and agencies of the Federal 

Government shall be closed and their employees excused from duty on 

Friday, December 26, 2014, the day after Christmas Day, except as provided 

in section 2 of this order. 

Sec. 2. The heads of executive branch departments and agencies may determine that certain offices and installations of their organizations, or parts 

thereof, must remain open and that certain employees must report for duty 

on December 26, 2014, for reasons of national security, defense, or other 

public need. 

Sec. 3. Friday, December 26, 2014, shall be considered as falling within 

the scope of Executive Order 11582 of February 11, 1971, and of 5 U.S.C. 

5546 and 6103(b) and other similar statutes insofar as they relate to the 

pay and leave of employees of the United States. 

Sec. 4. The Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall take 

such actions as may be necessary to implement this order. 

Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed 

to impair or otherwise affect: 

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, 

or the head thereof; or 

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 

relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. 

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and 

subject to the availability of appropriations. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with E0

73460 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 237 / Wednesday, December 10, 2014 / Presidential Documents 

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, 

substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party 

against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, 

employees, or agents, or any other person. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

December 5, 2014. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29121 

Filed 12–9–14; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3295–F5 


mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with E0OB#1.EPS</GPH>
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000389 21-OCT-2015 02:07 PM
Exhibit 11.1


GREKA ENERGY CORPORATION

Computation of Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
For the Three Month Period Ended March 31, 1999 and 1998

                                                        1999            1998
Basic Earnings
   Net Income (loss) before minority interest
     in earnings (loss) of consolidated subsidiary   (1,133,580)     (358,304)
   Minority interest in earnings (loss) of
     consolidated subsidiary                             (1,038)            0
   Preferred Stock dividends                             (8,958)            0
                                                     -----------    ----------
   Net Income (loss) available to Common             (1,141,498)     (358,304)
                                                     ===========    ==========
Basic Shares
   Weighted average number of Common                 -----------    ----------
     Shares outstanding                               3,025,655      1,558,843
                                                     ===========    ==========
Basic Earnings per Common Share                      -----------    ----------
   Net Income (loss) available to Common             $    (0.38)    $   (0.23)
                                                     ===========    ==========
Diluted Earnings
   Net Income (los) before minority interest
     in earnings (loss) of consolidated
     subsidiary                                      (1,133,580)     (358,304)
   Minority Interest in earnings (loss) of
     consolidated subsidiary                             (1,038)            0
   Preferred Stock dividends                             (8,958)            -
   Plus Interest expense attributable
     to Debentures, net of related income taxes               -             0
                                                     -----------    ----------
   Net Income (loss) available to Common             (1,141,498)     (358,304)
                                                     ===========    ==========
Diluted Shares
   Weighted average number of Common
     Shares outstanding                               3,025,655     1,558,843
   Effect of dilutive securities:
     Of shares underlying options                             -             0
     Of shares underlying convertible
       Debentures                                             -             0
                                                     -----------    ----------
   Diluted Shares                                     3,025,655     1,558,843
                                                     ===========    ==========
Diluted Earnings per Common Share                    -----------    ----------
   Net Income (loss)                                 $    (0.38)    $   (0.23)
                                                     ===========    ==========
Memo only (do not EDGARize)
Dilution factor: diluted EPS/basic EPS                  100.000%      100.000%
                                                     ===========    ==========
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ERIC WAYNE DAVIDSON, :

 :

Plaintiff, :

 :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 05-0335-BH-M

 :

BALDWIN COUNTY CORRECTION :

CENTER, et al., :

 :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this

file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been

no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED

as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be

and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to

prosecute and to obey the Court's Order.

DONE this 13th day of December, 2005.

s/ W. B. HAND 

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00335-BH-M Document 11 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 1