alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1641 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to enhance the administrative subpoena authority of the United States Postal Service, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2023 

Ms. MALLIOTAKIS (for herself and Ms. MENG) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to enhance the 

administrative subpoena authority of the United States 

Postal Service, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘USPS Subpoena Au5 thority Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATIVE 

7 SUBPOENA AUTHORITY. 

8 Section 3016(a)(1) of title 39, United States Code, 

9 is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1641 IH

1 (1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as sub2 paragraph (D); 

3 (2) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting 

4 the following: 

5 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In any investigation 

6 relating to a covered offense, the Postmaster 

7 General may issue in writing and cause to be 

8 served a subpoena requiring the production and 

9 testimony described in subparagraph (B). In 

10 this subparagraph, the term ‘covered offense’ 

11 means a violation of— 

12 ‘‘(i) any section in this chapter; 

13 ‘‘(ii) any section of chapter 83 of title 

14 18 insofar as such violation involves the 

15 use of the mails; 

16 ‘‘(iii) any other provision of law enu17 merated in section 3001(a); or 

18 ‘‘(iv) the Controlled Substances Act 

19 (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), insofar as such 

20 violation involves the use of the mails. 

21 ‘‘(B) PRODUCTION AND TESTIMONY.—Ex22 cept as provided in subparagraph (C), a sub23 poena issued under subparagraph (A) may re24 quire— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1641 IH

1 ‘‘(i) the production of any records (in2 cluding books, papers, documents, and 

3 other tangible things that constitute or 

4 contain evidence) that the Postmaster Gen5 eral considers relevant or material to such 

6 investigation; and 

7 ‘‘(ii) testimony by the custodian of the 

8 things required to be produced concerning 

9 the production and authenticity of those 

10 things. 

11 ‘‘(C) APPLICATION.—A subpoena issued in 

12 connection with an investigation under section 

13 3005(a) shall not require testimony as set forth 

14 in subparagraph (B)(ii).’’; and 

15 (3) in subparagraph (D), as redesignated by 

16 paragraph (1) of this section, by amending clause 

17 (iii) to read as follows: 

18 ‘‘(iii) delegation of subpoena approval 

19 authority be limited to the Postal Service’s 

20 General Counsel, a Deputy General Coun21 sel, or the Chief Postal Inspector.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Cecil R. BURLEY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 01-3158.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 26, 2001.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

*881ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 NASH-FINCH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Fiscal Year EndedDecember
    
    
    January
    
    
    January
    
    
    December
    
    
    December(In thousands, except ratios)
    
    28, 2002
    
    
    3, 2004
    
    
    1, 2005
    
    
    31, 2005
    
    
    30, 2006Fixed Charges:Interest expense on
indebtedness
    
    $
    30,429
    
    
    
    34,729
    
    
    
    27,181
    
    
    
    24,732
    
    
    
    26,644Rent expense (1/3 of total
rent expense)
    
    
    8,595
    
    
    
    9,838
    
    
    
    9,901
    
    
    
    10,386
    
    
    
    9,966Total fixed charges
    
    $
    39,024
    
    
    
    44,567
    
    
    
    37,082
    
    
    
    35,118
    
    
    
    36,610Earnings:Income before provision
for
income taxes
    
    $
    50,132
    
    
    
    51,933
    
    
    
    19,199
    
    
    
    66,866
    
    
    
    (17,493
    )Fixed charges
    
    
    39,024
    
    
    
    44,567
    
    
    
    37,082
    
    
    
    35,118
    
    
    
    36,610Total earnings
    
    $
    89,156
    
    
    
    96,500
    
    
    
    56,281
    
    
    
    101,984
    
    
    
    19,117Ratio
    
    
    2.28x
    
    
    
    2.17x
    
    
    
    1.52x
    
    
    
    2.90x
    
    
    
    0.52x
 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration (“SBA”) under Section 309 of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 107.1900 of the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations, SBA by this notice declares null and void the license to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 01/01-0411 issued to MB Growth Partners II, L.P.

United States Small Business Administration.

Dated: December 3, 2014.

Javier E. Saade,

Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2014-29145 Filed 12-10-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### George M. Adams *v.*Olivia Collier.

Dower — Husband and Wife — Lien for Purchase Money — Notice.

Where a husband pays a valuable consideration for land, acquiring the legal title without notice of the rights of a lien holder, the widow is entitled to dower.

Lien — Notice.

Where real estate is sold and a bond for a deed is executed and afterwards the bond is transferred, and the grantor sells and conveys such real estate, the purchaser having notice that his grantor has not paid for the land and of the lien of the seller, such purchaser takes the land subject to such lien, and his widow’s right of dower is subject thereto.

APPEAL PROM KNOX CIRCUIT COURT.

January 21, 1875.

OPINION by

Judge Lindsay:

Wood sold the tract of land to Renfro, and executed to him a bond for title. Renfro executed his note to Wood for the purchase price of the land.

Wood sold and transferred this note to appellant, Adams. After-wards Renfro sold to Collier. The proof conduces to show that Collier undertook,and agreed to pay off the note held by Adams. After all this, and without the consent or knowledge of Adams, Wood, at the request of Renfro and Collier, conveyed the land to Collier, retaining no lien to secure the payment of the amount due to Adams.

*324
      *Green & Adams, M. C. Johnson, for appellant.*

*J. W. Rodman, for appellee.*

Collier being dead, his widow claims that this conveyance invested her husband with the legal title to the land, free from any lien, and that her right to dower at once accrued, and is not affected by the subsequent recognition by her said husband of the existence of Adams’s lien.

Her claim would be valid if the husband had paid a valuable con - sideration for the land, and acquired the legal title without notice of the rights of Adams. But¡ this is not the case. Wood understood from Renfro and Collier that the latter was to pay the debt due to Adams.

The assignment to Adams of the note to Renfro, invested him with the lien then existing in favor of Wood to secure its payment. Wood had no right afterwards to surrender this lien. The party to whom the surrender was made, having notice of Adams’ equity, could not resist its enforcement. Mrs. Collier claims through her husband, and ber claim is subject to all the infirmities of her husband’s title. The court below erred in holding that her right to dower is superior to Adams’s lien. Judgment *reversed,*and cause remanded for a judganent conforming to this opinion.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHARLES CRENSHAW, :

:

Petitioner, :

:

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 05-0418-CG-B 

:

JERRY FERRELL. :

:

Respondent. :

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that petitioner’s habeas corpus petition

is DISMISSED.

DONE and ORDERED this 24th day of July, 2006.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:05-cv-00418-CG-B Document 14 Filed 07/24/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 75158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29487]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Committee to the Director (ACD), Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC); Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting of the aforementioned 
committee:

    Time and Date: 11:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m. (EST), January 13, 2015.
    Place: This meeting will be held by teleconference.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the availability of 
telephone ports. The public is welcome to participate during the 
public comment period, tentatively scheduled from 12:45 p.m. until 
12:50 p.m.
    To participate in the teleconference, please dial (877) 930-8819 
and enter code 1579739.
    Purpose: The Advisory Committee to the Director, CDC, shall 
advise the Secretary, HHS, and the Director, CDC, on policy and 
broad strategies that will enable CDC to fulfill its mission of 
protecting health through health promotion, prevention, and 
preparedness. The committee recommends ways to prioritize CDC's 
activities, improve results, and address health disparities. It also 
provides guidance to help CDC work more effectively with its various 
private and public sector constituents to make health protection a 
practical reality.
    Matters for Discussion: The Advisory Committee to the Director 
will receive updates from the State, Tribal, Local and Territorial 
Subcommittee; the External Laboratory Safety Workgroup, and the 
Public Health--Health Care Collaboration Workgroup; and an update 
from the CDC Director on the Ebola response.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Carmen Villar, MSW, 
Designated Federal Officer, ACD, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE., M/S D-
14, Atlanta, Georgia 30333; Telephone (404) 639-7158; Email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#40070829232b2d212e002324236e272f36"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="adeae5c4cec6c0ccc3edcec9ce83cac2db">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 2014-29487 Filed 12-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Kanawha & Ohio Coal Co. *v.*A. D. Hunt, et al.

Judgment — Process—Cause of Action.

No valid judgment can be taken against a party not served with process and who does not appear to the action.

Cause of Action.

A party seeking to recover as the assignee of another must do so, if at all, on the cause of action set up by his assignor, and not on a separate cause of action he may have independent of the rights he secured by the assignment.

*179APPEAL PROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT.

October 24, 1874.

*J. C. Carlisle, for appellant.*

*Benton & Benton, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

The authority of Smith to bind appellant was distinctly denied in the answer, and was not proved. The appellant also distinctly denied that any settlement had ever been made, and also denied any indebtedness to the appellee, Hunt, and none was proved, the master’s report being based alone, as it appears, upon the writing sued on, which, for want of proof of Smith’s authority, was no evidence of indebtedness on the part of appellant.

Jackson never was made a party to the suit, and if he had been, he was not entitled to a judgment. Plis answer, which was allowed to be filed as if he had been a defendant, was made a cross-petition against the appellant, who was his co-defendant, and no process thereon having been served, and appellant never having appeared to the cross-petition, the judgment in his favor was void. Nor can the judgment in his favor be upheld on the ground that it was for a part of the demand sued for by Hunt, and assigned by him pending the action to Jackson. Hunt sued on the writing signed by Smith, and Jackson has recovered a judgment on notes of appellant executed to him; and an entirely distinct cause of action is set up for the first time in Jackson’s cross-petition.

If Jackson would recover as the assignee of Hunt, he must recover on the cause of action set up by his assignor; and if he seeks to recover on the notes filed with his answer and cross-petition, he should proceed in a separate action.

Wherefore the judgments are *reversed,*and the cause is remanded with directions to strike Jackson’s answer from the files, and for further proceedings.
Exhibit 10.8


 


Rental Agreement


 


Lessor: Bengbu Boyuanzhiye Co., Ltd.


 


Lessee: Anhui Renrenjia Solar energy Co.,
Ltd.


 


		1.	The
                                         rental area is located in the people’s industrial park Guzhen County, the total
                                         area is 9500 square meters.



 


		2.	The
                                         leasing term is from Feb 01, 2014 to Feb 01, 2015.



 


		3.	The
                                         lessee can use the leasing area for free during the lease term.



 


		4.	The
                                         lessee shall pay for all the electricity and water charges every month during the lease
                                         term.



 


		5.	The
                                         purpose of the rental area is for solar energy equipment manufacture.



 


		6.	The
                                         lessee shall be responsible for all the maintenance and repairmen cost of the rental
                                         area.



 


		7.	Without
                                         the written consent of the lessor, the lessee can not lend the area to third party.



 


		8.	If
                                         the lessee violates this agreement and lend the area to the third party, the lessee shall
                                         be responsible to pay for all the damages.



 


 


	Lessor:
    Bengbu Boyuanzhiye Co., Ltd.	 	Lessee:
    Anhui Renrenjia Solar Energy Co., Ltd.
	 	 	 
	/s/
                                         Bengbu Boyuanzhiye Co., Ltd.



	 	/s/
    Anhui Renrenjia Solar Energy Co., Ltd.
	(corporate
    chop)	 	(corporate
    chop)
	 	 	 
	Date: Feb
    01, 2014	 	Date: Feb
    01, 2014
Exhibit
32.2











THE
MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906


OF
THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Annual Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
The Monarch Cement Company and will be retained by The Monarch Cement Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.













Dated:  March
16, 2010




/s/ Debra P.
Roe


Debra P. Roe, CPA


Chief Financial Officer
and


Assistant
Secretary-Treasurer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NATURES WAY MARINE, LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-0316-CG-M

)

EVERCLEAR OF OHIO, LTD., and 

NIRK MAGNATE HOLDING CORP.,

)

)

)

Defendants. )

AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the verdict of the jury entered on November 24, 2014 

(Doc. 207), and the Court’s Order entered on April 17, 2015 (Doc. 225), it is 

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, that JUDGEMENT is hereby entered 

in favor of Plaintiff, Natures Way Marine, LLC, and against Defendants, Everclear 

of Ohio, Ltd and Nirk Magnate Holding Corp. Damages are hereby awarded to 

Natures Way Marine, LLC for breach of contract in the amount of $205,512.00, and 

attorneys’ fees are awarded to Natures Way Marine, LLC in the amount of 

$69,336.15. Prejudgment interest is awarded at an annual interest rate of 3.25%. 

Post judgment interest is awarded at the statutory rate of .22% pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1961.

It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, that 

JUDGEMENT is entered in favor of Counter-Defendant, Natures Way Marine, 

LLC, and against Counter-claimants, Everclear of Ohio, Ltd and Nirk Magnate 

Holding Corp. Accordingly, the counterclaims filed by Everclear of Ohio, Ltd (Doc. 

Case 1:12-cv-00316-CG-M Document 227 Filed 04/22/15 Page 1 of 2
68), and the counterclaims filed by Nirk Magnate Holding Corp (Doc. 67) are hereby 

DISMISSED with prejudice.

As set forth in the Court’s Order (Doc. 225) the expenses claimed by the 

plaintiff were denied; therefore, no costs are to be taxed.

DONE and ORDERED this 22nd day of April, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00316-CG-M Document 227 Filed 04/22/15 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Gaiam, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JanetMathews, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: March  21, 2005 |                     |
|-----------------------|--------------------------|
|                  |                     |
|                  | /s/ Janet  Mathews       |   |
|                  | Janet  Mathews           |
|                  | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 240 (Monday, December 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74115-74116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29214]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


Meetings of Humanities Panel

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Humanities will hold three 
meetings of the Humanities Panel, a federal advisory committee, during 
January, 2015. The purpose of the meetings is for panel review, 
discussion, evaluation, and recommendation of applications for 
financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and 
Humanities Act of 1965.

DATES: See Supplementary Information section for meeting dates.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at The John W. Kluge Center at the 
Library of Congress, 101 Independence Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20540-
4860.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisette Voyatzis, Committee Management 
Officer, 400 7th Street SW., Room 4060, Washington, DC 20506; (202)606-
8322; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fd988b92849c8987948ebd939895d39a928b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="385d4e5741594c42514b78565d50165f574e">[email protected]</span></a>. Hearing-impaired individuals who prefer to 
contact us by phone may use NEH's TDD terminal at (202) 606-8282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the 
following meetings:

1. DATE: January 27, 2015
    TIME: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    This meeting will discuss applications for Kluge Fellowships, 
submitted to the division of Research Programs.
2. DATE: January 28, 2015
    TIME: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    This meeting will discuss applications for Kluge Fellowships, 
submitted to the division of Research Programs.
3. DATE: January 29, 2015
    TIME: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

[[Page 74116]]

    This meeting will discuss applications for Kluge Fellowships, 
submitted to the division of Research Programs.

Because these meetings will include review of personal and/or 
proprietary financial and commercial information given in confidence 
to the agency by grant applicants, the meetings will be closed to 
the public pursuant to sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6) of Title 
5, U.S.C., as amended. I have made this determination pursuant to 
the authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority 
to Close Advisory Committee Meetings dated July 19, 1993.

    Dated: December 9, 2014.
Lisette Voyatzis,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-29214 Filed 12-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>