DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

Recommendation 1: The federal government should consider establishing a comprehensive national 

IoT strategy that outlines clear goals and objectives for IoT adoption in supply chain management. 

Description:

The federal government should consider establishing a comprehensive national IoT strategy that 

outlines clear goals and objectives for IoT adoption in supply chain management. This strategy should 

encompass regulatory frameworks, infrastructure development, education, and incentives for 

implementation.

Justification:

The justification for developing a national IoT strategy lies in the numerous benefits that IoT can bring to 

various industries, including supply chain management, as well as the overall economy and society. A 

comprehensive and coordinated national IoT strategy can help ensure that these benefits are fully 

realized and that potential challenges and risks are adequately addressed. Here are some key 

justifications for developing a national IoT strategy:

• Economic growth and competitiveness: A national IoT strategy for adoption in supply chain 

management can foster innovation, drive economic growth, and enhance the competitiveness 

of industries by promoting the widespread adoption and integration of IoT technologies. This 

can lead to increased productivity, reduced operational costs, and new business opportunities 

across various sectors.

• Enhanced efficiency and resilience of supply chains: IoT technologies can significantly improve 

supply chain efficiency, transparency, and resilience by enabling real-time monitoring, datadriven decision-making, and automation of processes. A national IoT strategy can provide 

guidance and support for businesses to adopt and integrate IoT solutions within their supply 

chains, thereby enhancing overall supply chain performance.

• Job creation and workforce development: The widespread adoption of IoT technologies will lead 

to the creation of new jobs and the need for skilled workers in areas such as data analytics, IoT 

device development, and cybersecurity. A national IoT strategy for adoption in supply chain 

management can help guide investments in education and workforce development to ensure 

that citizens are equipped with the necessary skills for the future IoT-driven job market.

• Addressing cybersecurity and privacy concerns: As IoT devices generate and process large 

amounts of data, there are inherent risks related to cybersecurity and data privacy. A national 

IoT strategy for supply chain management can help establish guidelines, standards, and best 

practices for IoT security and data protection, ensuring that the risks are adequately addressed 

and managed.

• Encouraging collaboration and standardization: A national IoT strategy can promote 

collaboration among businesses, academia, and government agencies, fostering innovation and 

knowledge sharing. Furthermore, it can help drive the development and adoption of IoT 

standards for supply chain management, which are essential for interoperability, security, and 

scalability of IoT solutions.

• Ensuring equitable access and benefits: A national IoT strategy can ensure that the benefits of 

IoT technologies are distributed equitably across enterprises engaged in supply chain 

management, addressing potential digital divides and promoting inclusive growth.

Implementation Considerations:

• Stakeholder engagement: Engage with key stakeholders, including businesses, academia, and 

government agencies, to identify priorities, needs, and challenges related to IoT adoption in 
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

supply chain management. This collaboration will ensure the strategy is comprehensive, 

practical, and aligned with industry requirements.

• Focus on key areas: Prioritize areas within the supply chain where IoT can provide the most 

significant benefits and address the most pressing challenges, such as inventory management, 

transportation and logistics, and quality control.

• Support innovation and R&D: Foster innovation and R&D in IoT technologies by providing 

funding, incentives, and resources to businesses and research institutions. This will accelerate 

the development and commercialization of advanced IoT solutions tailored to supply chain 

management.

• Develop standards and guidelines: Establish standards and guidelines for IoT implementation in 

supply chain management, focusing on interoperability, security, and data privacy. This will 

facilitate seamless integration and adoption of IoT technologies across supply chains while 

addressing potential risks.

• Promote workforce development: Invest in education and workforce development programs to 

ensure that workers have the necessary skills and expertise to thrive in an IoT-driven supply 

chain environment.

• Encourage public-private partnerships: Foster collaboration between public and private sectors 

to promote IoT adoption in supply chain management, share knowledge, and address common 

challenges.

• Monitor progress and adapt: Establish mechanisms to monitor and evaluate the progress of IoT 

adoption in supply chain management, and adapt the national strategy as needed based on 

emerging trends, technologies, and challenges.

Potential implementation barriers: (may need revision – these are more focused on overall barriers to 

adoption)

• Funding constraints: Allocating sufficient funds to support IoT infrastructure, research and 

development, and workforce development initiatives can be a challenge, especially when 

competing with other national priorities.

• Interagency coordination: Developing a national IoT strategy requires close coordination among 

various federal agencies, which may have different goals, agendas, and regulatory frameworks.

Ensuring a cohesive and consistent approach across agencies can be challenging.

• Resistance to change: Some stakeholders within the supply chain ecosystem may resist adopting 

IoT technologies due to concerns about job displacement, technological complexity, or fear of 

change. Overcoming this resistance requires effective communication, education, and change 

management strategies.

• Cybersecurity and data privacy concerns: Ensuring the security and privacy of the vast amounts 

of data generated by IoT devices is a significant challenge. Addressing these concerns requires 

investment in robust security measures and the development of comprehensive data protection 

policies and regulations.

• Standardization and interoperability: The IoT ecosystem consists of a wide variety of devices, 

platforms, and communication protocols. Developing and enforcing standards for 

interoperability can be a complex and time-consuming process, which may slow down the 

implementation of a national IoT strategy.

• Skilled workforce shortage: The rapid growth of IoT technologies and applications may outpace 

the availability of a skilled workforce in fields such as data analytics, IoT device development, 

and cybersecurity. Addressing this talent gap requires investments in education and workforce

development programs.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

• Legal and regulatory barriers: Existing laws and regulations may not adequately address the 

unique challenges posed by IoT technologies in supply chain management. Updating and 

harmonizing these legal and regulatory frameworks can be a complex and time-consuming 

process.

• Balancing innovation and regulation: Striking the right balance between promoting innovation 

and ensuring consumer protection, security, and privacy can be challenging. The federal 

government must carefully consider the potential trade-offs and unintended consequences of 

new regulations on IoT adoption and innovation.

Possible participating agencies:

Federal agencies that may be impacted by this recommendation include the Department of Commerce, 

the Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Energy, and the 

National Institute of Standards and Technology, among others. 

Federal considerations:

• Aligning the strategy with broader national priorities and policies, such as economic growth, job 

creation, and environmental sustainability.

• Engaging with industry associations and international organizations to ensure that the strategy 

is in line with global trends and best practices.

• Coordinating efforts and resources across federal agencies to avoid duplication and ensure a 

cohesive approach.

• Providing financial and technical support to businesses, especially small and medium-sized 

enterprises, to help them overcome barriers to IoT adoption.

• Ensuring that the strategy addresses the concerns and needs of all stakeholders, including 

businesses, workers, consumers, and communities.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

Recommendation 2: The federal government should consider creating industry standards and 

protocols. 

Description:

The recommendation to consider creating industry standards and protocols is aimed at promoting the 

widespread adoption of IoT technology in supply chain management by ensuring interoperability, 

reliability, and security across various IoT systems and devices. By establishing a set of common 

standards and protocols, businesses can seamlessly integrate IoT solutions into their existing supply 

chain operations, facilitating data exchange, and enabling more efficient and informed decision-making 

processes. 

Developing industry standards and protocols involves collaboration between government agencies, 

industry stakeholders, technology providers, and researchers to identify the key requirements and 

specifications for IoT systems in supply chain management. This may include addressing issues such as 

data formats, communication protocols, security measures, and device compatibility, among others.

To implement this recommendation, the government should support and participate in relevant 

standard-setting organizations and industry-led initiatives, working closely with stakeholders to develop 

consensus-based standards and protocols tailored to the unique needs and challenges of supply chain 

management. These standards should be flexible and adaptable, allowing for continuous innovation and 

improvement as technology evolves.

In addition, the government should promote the adoption of these standards and protocols through 

education and awareness campaigns, providing businesses with the necessary resources and guidance 

to successfully implement IoT solutions in their supply chain operations. By creating industry standards 

and protocols, the government can help to create a stable and unified foundation for IoT technology, 

driving its widespread adoption, and maximizing its potential benefits for businesses and consumers 

alike.

Justification:

The justification for creating industry standards and protocols in the context of IoT technology adoption, 

particularly for supply chain management, lies in several key benefits that they offer:

1. Interoperability: Industry standards and protocols ensure that IoT devices, systems, and 

platforms from different manufacturers can communicate and work together seamlessly. This is 

crucial for the successful integration of IoT technologies into complex supply chains, where 

multiple stakeholders and systems are involved.

2. Scalability: Standardization enables businesses to scale their IoT implementations more easily, 

as they can rely on a consistent set of protocols and guidelines when adding new devices or 

expanding their IoT networks. This lowers the risk of incompatibilities and simplifies the process 

of integrating new components.

3. Innovation and competition: Standards and protocols can stimulate innovation and competition 

by providing a level playing field for businesses and developers, regardless of their size or 

market share. This encourages the development of new products and services that adhere to 

established standards, ultimately benefiting consumers and the entire industry.

4. Cybersecurity and data privacy: By establishing robust security protocols and guidelines for data 

protection, industry standards can help address the inherent risks associated with IoT, such as 

cybersecurity threats and data privacy concerns. This fosters consumer trust and promotes the 

adoption of IoT technologies across the supply chain.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

5. Simplified integration and maintenance: Industry standards and protocols streamline the 

process of integrating IoT technologies into existing systems and processes, reducing the time 

and resources required for implementation. Furthermore, standardized systems are typically 

easier to maintain and troubleshoot, as they follow a common set of guidelines and best 

practices.

6. Cost savings: Standardization can lead to cost savings for businesses by reducing the need for 

customized solutions and simplifying the procurement process. It also promotes economies of 

scale, as standardized components and devices can be produced more efficiently, leading to 

lower costs for manufacturers and end-users.

7. Regulatory compliance: Standards and protocols can serve as a foundation for government 

regulations and policies related to IoT and supply chain management. This helps ensure that 

businesses adhere to best practices for security, privacy, and environmental impact, enhancing 

the overall stability and sustainability of the IoT ecosystem.

By creating industry standards and protocols for IoT technologies in supply chain management, 

stakeholders can enjoy a range of benefits that ultimately lead to improved efficiency, security, and 

innovation within the industry. These standards serve as a crucial foundation for the widespread 

adoption and integration of IoT technologies, enabling businesses to fully realize their potential benefits 

while addressing potential challenges and risks.

Implementation Considerations:

Implementation considerations for creating industry standards and protocols for supply chain include:

1. Inclusiveness: Involve a diverse range of stakeholders, including businesses, technology 

providers, academia, and government agencies, in the development of standards and protocols. 

This ensures that the resulting guidelines are comprehensive, practical, and aligned with the 

needs and priorities of all relevant parties.

2. Prioritize critical areas: Focus on the most critical aspects of supply chain management where 

standardization can yield significant benefits, such as data exchange, device interoperability, 

security, and privacy.

3. Build on existing standards: Leverage existing industry standards and best practices as a starting 

point, and adapt or expand upon them as necessary to address the specific requirements of 

supply chain management.

4. Flexibility and adaptability: Design standards and protocols that are flexible and can be easily 

updated to accommodate new technologies, emerging threats, and evolving industry needs.

5. Promote adoption: Encourage and incentivize businesses to adopt the established standards and 

protocols through education, outreach, and support programs.

6. Ensure compliance: Develop mechanisms to monitor and enforce compliance with the 

established standards and protocols, including certifications, audits, and penalties for noncompliance.

Potential implementation barriers:

Possible barriers to implementing this recommendation include:
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

1. Resistance to standardization: Some businesses and stakeholders may resist standardization 

efforts due to concerns about the potential loss of competitive advantage, customization 

capabilities, or intellectual property rights.

2. Fragmentation: The IoT landscape is highly fragmented, with numerous vendors, platforms, and 

technologies. Achieving consensus and collaboration among all stakeholders can be challenging.

3. Cost and resource constraints: Developing and implementing industry standards and protocols 

can be resource-intensive, requiring significant investments in time, money, and expertise.

4. Rapid technological advancements: The IoT field is rapidly evolving, making it difficult to keep 

standards and protocols up-to-date and relevant.

Possible participating agencies:

Federal agencies that may be impacted by this recommendation include the National Institute of 

Standards and Technology (NIST), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Department of Commerce, 

the Department of Transportation, and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), among others.

Federal considerations:

In implementing industry standards and protocols for supply chain, the federal government should 

consider:

1. Providing a regulatory framework that supports standardization efforts while also promoting 

innovation and competition.

2. Collaborating with international organizations and foreign governments to ensure that the 

developed standards and protocols are globally relevant and can be harmonized with 

international guidelines.

3. Offering financial and technical support to businesses, particularly small and medium-sized 

enterprises, to help them adopt and comply with the established standards and protocols.

4. Monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of the standards and protocols over time, and 

making adjustments as needed to address emerging challenges and opportunities.

By taking these factors into account, the federal government can facilitate the development and 

implementation of effective industry standards and protocols for IoT in supply chain management, 

driving the widespread adoption of IoT technologies and maximizing their benefits while mitigating 

potential risks.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

Recommendation 3: The federal government should consider providing financial incentives. 

Description:

The recommendation to establish and provide financial incentives aims to encourage businesses to 

adopt IoT technologies in their supply chain operations by reducing the initial investment costs and 

perceived risks associated with the implementation of IoT solutions. Financial incentives, such as tax

breaks, grants, subsidies, or low-interest loans, can help lower the financial barriers for companies to 

experiment with and deploy IoT systems, leading to more widespread adoption and innovation in the 

sector.

By offering financial support, the government can promote the development and integration of IoT 

solutions into supply chain management, enabling businesses to capitalize on the various benefits IoT 

offers, such as improved efficiency, transparency, and resilience. Furthermore, financial incentives can 

stimulate private sector investment, drive the growth of IoT technology providers, and foster an 

ecosystem that encourages collaboration and innovation within the industry.

It is crucial, however, for the government to carefully design and target these financial incentives, 

ensuring that they align with strategic objectives and deliver measurable impact. By doing so, the 

federal government can effectively drive IoT adoption in supply chain management, unlocking its full 

potential to transform the industry and strengthen national competitiveness.

Justification:

The justification for providing financial incentives as a recommendation is to accelerate the adoption of 

IoT technology in supply chain management, particularly within the manufacturing sector. Financial 

incentives can lower the initial barriers to entry, making IoT adoption more feasible and attractive for 

businesses. The main reasons for this recommendation are:

1. Encouraging investment: Financial incentives, such as tax credits, grants, or low-interest loans, 

can help businesses offset the costs associated with implementing IoT solutions in their supply 

chains. This financial support can encourage companies to invest in IoT technology, even if they 

are initially hesitant due to the perceived risks or costs involved.

2. Stimulating innovation: Financial incentives can spur innovation in the IoT space for supply chain 

management by providing companies with the resources they need to experiment with new 

technologies and solutions. This can lead to the development of new IoT applications and the 

refinement of existing ones, ultimately contributing to the overall competitiveness of the 

manufacturing sector.

3. Enhancing competitiveness: By lowering the barriers to IoT adoption, financial incentives can 

help businesses in the manufacturing sector become more competitive on a global scale. 

Companies that leverage IoT technology can improve their supply chain efficiency, 

responsiveness, and resilience, allowing them to better compete with international rivals.

4. Creating jobs and economic growth: The implementation of IoT technology in supply chains can 

lead to job creation and contribute to economic growth. As companies adopt IoT solutions, they 

will require skilled workers to develop, implement, and maintain these systems. Financial 

incentives can help stimulate this job growth and support the development of a skilled 

workforce in the IoT sector.

5. Promoting sustainability: IoT technology can contribute to more sustainable supply chain 

practices, such as reducing waste, conserving resources, and minimizing emissions. Financial 
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

incentives can encourage businesses to adopt IoT solutions that support these goals, ultimately 

promoting environmental sustainability and corporate social responsibility.

Implementation Considerations:

Implementation considerations for providing financial incentives for supply chain IoT adoption include 

the following:

1. Identifying appropriate incentives: The federal government should assess the most effective 

financial incentives to promote IoT adoption in the supply chain, such as grants, tax credits, lowinterest loans, or subsidies. This may involve consulting with industry experts, conducting costbenefit analyses, and evaluating the success of similar programs in other countries or sectors.

2. Defining eligibility criteria: Clear eligibility criteria should be established to ensure that the 

financial incentives are targeted at companies that can benefit the most from IoT adoption

across supply chains, such as small and medium-sized enterprises or businesses in critical 

industries. Criteria may include company size, revenue, industry sector, or proposed IoT 

projects.

3. Coordinating among federal agencies: Federal agencies that may be impacted by this 

recommendation include the Department of Commerce, the Small Business Administration, and 

the Department of Energy. These agencies should coordinate their efforts to ensure efficient 

and effective implementation of the financial incentives program. Collaboration with state and 

local governments may also be necessary to align initiatives and maximize the impact.

4. Monitoring and evaluation: The federal government should establish a system for monitoring 

and evaluating the effectiveness of the financial incentives program. This may include tracking 

key performance indicators, such as the number of IoT projects funded, the amount of private 

investment leveraged, and the impact on supply chain efficiency and sustainability. Periodic 

reviews should be conducted to assess the program's success and identify areas for 

improvement.

5. Addressing potential barriers: Possible barriers to implementing this recommendation may 

include budget constraints, lack of political support, or concerns about market distortion. The 

federal government should address these concerns by demonstrating the potential economic 

and environmental benefits of IoT adoption in supply chains, leveraging public-private 

partnerships to share costs, and ensuring that the financial incentives are designed to minimize 

market distortions.

6. Raising awareness and providing technical assistance: The federal government should consider 

implementing outreach campaigns to inform companies about the available financial incentives 

and the benefits of IoT adoption in supply chain management. Additionally, providing technical 

assistance to businesses in identifying, developing, and implementing IoT projects can help 

ensure the successful deployment of these technologies and maximize the impact of the 

financial incentives program.

Potential implementation barriers:

1. Budget constraints: Limited budgetary resources can restrict the federal government's ability to 

allocate sufficient funds for financial incentives. This may result in a smaller or less 

comprehensive program, reducing its overall impact on IoT adoption.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

2. Political opposition: Financial incentives may face opposition from certain political groups or 

stakeholders who argue against government intervention in the market or perceive the 

incentives as favoring specific industries or companies.

3. Bureaucratic hurdles: The implementation of financial incentives may require collaboration and 

coordination among multiple federal agencies, which can introduce bureaucratic challenges and 

delays in rolling out the program.

4. Inefficient allocation of resources: There is a risk that financial incentives may be allocated to 

businesses that do not use the funds effectively or do not fully commit to IoT adoption, leading 

to an inefficient use of government resources.

5. Market distortion: Financial incentives may inadvertently create market distortions if they 

disproportionately benefit certain companies or industries, leading to an uneven playing field 

and potential resistance from competitors.

6. Difficulty in measuring impact: Assessing the direct impact of financial incentives on IoT 

adoption in supply chains can be challenging, as multiple factors contribute to a company's 

decision to invest in new technologies. This may make it difficult for the federal government to 

demonstrate the effectiveness of the incentives program and justify its continued funding.

7. Lack of awareness: Companies may not be aware of the available financial incentives or may not 

understand the potential benefits of IoT adoption in their supply chains, limiting the program's 

effectiveness in driving change.

Possible participating agencies:

1. Department of Commerce (DOC): The DOC, through its various bureaus, could support initiatives 

related to IoT adoption in supply chain management by offering grants, loans, or tax incentives 

to businesses investing in IoT technologies.

2. Small Business Administration (SBA): The SBA could provide financial assistance in the form of 

loans, grants, or other funding programs specifically targeted at small and medium-sized 

businesses looking to invest in IoT for their supply chain operations.

3. Department of Energy (DOE): The DOE might offer incentives to support IoT adoption in supply 

chain management for energy-related industries, such as smart grid technology, renewable 

energy production, and energy-efficient transportation.

4. Department of Transportation (DOT): The DOT could provide funding and incentives for IoT 

projects related to transportation and logistics within supply chains, such as smart 

transportation infrastructure or vehicle-to-vehicle communication.

5. National Science Foundation (NSF): The NSF could offer research grants or funding for projects 

aimed at developing and implementing innovative IoT technologies for supply chain 

management, fostering cutting-edge advancements in the field.

6. Department of Agriculture (USDA): The USDA might provide financial incentives for IoT adoption 

in the agricultural sector, helping to modernize supply chains, improve traceability, and increase 

overall efficiency in food production and distribution.

7. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): The EPA could offer financial incentives to businesses 

that adopt IoT solutions to reduce their environmental impact, such as reducing waste, 

conserving resources, or minimizing carbon emissions within their supply chains.

8. Department of Defense (DoD): The DoD could support IoT adoption in supply chain 

management for defense-related industries, investing in technologies that improve the 

efficiency, security, and resilience of defense supply chains.

9. Department of Labor (DOL): The DOL might provide funding for workforce development and 

training programs focused on IoT technologies in supply chain management, equipping workers 

with the necessary skills to support IoT adoption.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

Federal considerations:

1. Budget constraints: Financial incentives require budget allocations, and government resources 

are often limited. It is crucial to carefully evaluate the potential return on investment and 

prioritize IoT adoption projects that provide the highest impact on supply chain efficiency, 

resilience, and sustainability.

2. Targeting the right recipients: Financial incentives should be targeted at businesses or sectors 

that face the greatest barriers to IoT adoption or have the potential to drive significant 

improvements in supply chain performance. This may include small and medium-sized 

enterprises, which often face greater challenges in accessing resources for technology 

investments.

3. Balancing public and private investment: While financial incentives can help to spur IoT 

adoption, it is essential to strike the right balance between public and private investment. The 

government should encourage businesses to invest in IoT technology by providing a supportive 

policy environment and removing regulatory barriers, while also providing targeted financial 

incentives where appropriate.

4. Ensuring fairness and transparency: Financial incentives should be distributed in a transparent 

and equitable manner to avoid favoritism or distortion of competition. Criteria for eligibility and 

allocation of funding should be clearly defined and communicated to all relevant stakeholders.

5. Encouraging innovation: Financial incentives should be designed to promote the development 

and adoption of innovative IoT solutions, rather than supporting outdated or inefficient 

technologies. This can be achieved by offering incentives for research and development, pilot 

projects, or the adoption of cutting-edge IoT solutions.

6. Collaboration with industry and academia: The government should engage with industry 

stakeholders, research institutions, and other relevant parties to ensure that financial incentives 

are aligned with the needs and priorities of the supply chain sector. This will help to maximize 

the impact of incentives and foster long-term partnerships between the public and private 

sectors.

7. Flexibility and adaptability: As the IoT landscape evolves rapidly, the government should be 

prepared to regularly review and update its financial incentive programs to ensure their 

continued relevance and effectiveness. This may involve adjusting funding priorities, eligibility 

criteria, or the types of incentives offered.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

Recommendation 4: The federal government should consider fostering public-private partnerships.

Description:

The recommendation to establish and foster public-private partnerships (PPPs) focused on IoT adoption 

aims to facilitate collaboration and knowledge sharing between government agencies, businesses, 

technology providers, and academia. By creating a platform that encourages the exchange of ideas, 

resources, and expertise, PPPs can help to accelerate the development, deployment, and adoption of 

IoT technologies in supply chain management.

Public-private partnerships can play a pivotal role in overcoming common challenges associated with IoT 

adoption, such as the lack of infrastructure, technical knowledge, and financial resources. By pooling 

resources and aligning efforts, PPPs can enable the development of innovative IoT solutions, pilot 

projects, and proof-of-concept initiatives that demonstrate the value and benefits of IoT in supply chain 

operations.

Additionally, PPPs can support workforce development and training programs, ensuring that businesses 

have access to skilled professionals capable of implementing and managing IoT systems. They can also 

facilitate the creation of regulatory frameworks and standards, promoting a conducive environment for 

IoT adoption across the supply chain industry.

To implement this recommendation, the government should actively engage with relevant stakeholders, 

identify shared goals and objectives, and establish mechanisms for ongoing collaboration and support. 

By fostering public-private partnerships focused on IoT adoption, the government can create a thriving 

ecosystem that drives innovation and competitiveness in the supply chain sector, ultimately realizing the 

full potential of IoT technologies.

Justification:

The justification for fostering public-private partnerships as a recommendation lies in the potential 

benefits of collaboration between the government and the private sector in promoting IoT adoption in 

supply chain management. Public-private partnerships can help overcome barriers to IoT 

implementation and unlock the full potential of this technology. The main reasons for this 

recommendation are:

1. Leveraging resources and expertise: Public-private partnerships allow both the government and 

private sector organizations to pool their resources, knowledge, and expertise. This 

collaboration can lead to more effective and efficient IoT implementation across supply chains, 

as well as the development of innovative solutions tailored to specific supply chain challenges.

2. Risk sharing: IoT adoption in supply chain management may involve significant investments and 

risks for businesses. Public-private partnerships can help share these risks, providing businesses 

with the confidence to invest in IoT technology and reducing potential financial burdens.

3. Accelerating technology adoption: By collaborating with the private sector, the government can 

help speed up the deployment of IoT solutions in supply chains. Public-private partnerships can 

facilitate the development and implementation of pilot projects, promoting the testing and 

scaling of innovative IoT solutions.

4. Addressing regulatory challenges: Public-private partnerships can help address regulatory and 

policy challenges associated with IoT technology. By involving private sector stakeholders in the 

decision-making process, the government can develop more informed and targeted regulations 

that support IoT adoption while addressing potential risks.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

5. Fostering innovation: Collaborative efforts between the public and private sectors can create a 

fertile environment for innovation in IoT and supply chain management. Public-private 

partnerships can help identify and address gaps in the market, support research and 

development initiatives, and encourage the exchange of ideas and best practices.

6. Enhancing global competitiveness: Public-private partnerships can strengthen the 

competitiveness of the manufacturing sector on a global scale. By working together, the 

government and private sector can accelerate the development and deployment of IoT 

technology, enabling businesses to compete more effectively with international rivals.

7. Building trust and cooperation: Fostering public-private partnerships can help build trust and 

cooperation between the government and the private sector, which is essential for addressing 

complex challenges in supply chain management. A strong partnership can facilitate dialogue 

and encourage collaborative problem-solving, ensuring that the interests of all stakeholders are 

considered in the development and implementation of IoT solutions.

Implementation Considerations:

Implementation considerations for fostering public-private partnerships for supply chain IoT adoption 

include:

1. Identifying key stakeholders: The federal government should identify relevant private sector 

stakeholders, including businesses, industry associations, research institutions, and technology 

providers, who can contribute to the development and implementation of IoT solutions in 

supply chain management.

2. Establishing a collaborative framework: A formal framework should be established to facilitate 

collaboration between the public and private sectors. This may include creating joint working 

groups, industry forums, or innovation hubs, where stakeholders can share ideas, knowledge, 

and resources.

3. Defining clear goals and objectives: Public-private partnerships should have well-defined goals 

and objectives that align with the overall strategy for promoting IoT adoption in supply chain 

management. This will help ensure that all stakeholders are working towards a common vision 

and can measure their progress.

4. Developing joint projects and initiatives: The federal government and private sector 

stakeholders should collaborate on joint projects and initiatives that address specific challenges 

or opportunities in supply chain management. These could include pilot projects, research and 

development programs, or the development of new IoT standards and protocols.

5. Ensuring effective communication and coordination: Open and transparent communication 

between the public and private sectors is critical for successful collaboration. Regular meetings, 

progress reports, and information sharing mechanisms should be established to facilitate 

coordination and maintain momentum.

6. Monitoring and evaluation: The federal government should establish a system for monitoring 

and evaluating the effectiveness of public-private partnerships in promoting IoT adoption in 

supply chain management. This may involve tracking key performance indicators, such as the 

number of joint projects implemented, the amount of private investment leveraged, and the 

impact on supply chain efficiency and resilience.

Potential implementation barriers:
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

Possible barriers to implementing this recommendation include:

1. Mistrust between public and private sectors: A lack of trust between the government and 

private sector stakeholders can hinder collaboration and limit the effectiveness of public-private 

partnerships.

2. Differing priorities and objectives: Public and private sector stakeholders may have different 

priorities, objectives, and timelines, which can create challenges in aligning their efforts.

3. Intellectual property and data privacy concerns: Private sector stakeholders may be hesitant to 

share proprietary information or data with the government, hindering collaboration and 

knowledge sharing.

4. Limited resources: Both the government and private sector organizations may face resource 

constraints that limit their ability to participate in public-private partnerships.

Possible participating agencies:

Federal agencies that may be impacted by this recommendation include the Department of Commerce, 

the Department of Transportation, the Department of Energy, and the Small Business Administration.

Federal considerations:

The federal government should consider addressing trust and communication issues, aligning priorities 

and objectives, protecting intellectual property and data privacy, and allocating resources efficiently to 

ensure the successful implementation of public-private partnerships for IoT adoption in supply chain 

management.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

Recommendation 5: The federal government should invest in education and workforce development.

Description:

The recommendation to invest in and promote education and workforce development focused on IoT 

aims to address the growing demand for skilled professionals capable of designing, implementing, and 

managing IoT systems in supply chain operations. By investing in educational programs, training 

initiatives, and professional development opportunities, the government can ensure that businesses 

have access to a workforce equipped with the necessary expertise to harness the potential of IoT 

technologies.

Investing in IoT-focused education and workforce development involves developing curricula at various 

educational levels, ranging from K-12 to higher education and vocational training, to incorporate IoT 

concepts, technologies, and applications relevant to supply chain management. It also includes creating 

partnerships between educational institutions, industry stakeholders, and technology providers to 

facilitate internships, apprenticeships, and real-world projects that offer practical experience in IoT 

implementation.

In addition to formal education, promoting workforce development involves offering continuous 

learning opportunities, such as workshops, certifications, and online courses, for professionals looking to 

expand their IoT-related skills and knowledge. These initiatives can help ensure that the workforce stays 

up-to-date with the latest trends and innovations in the IoT landscape, thereby fostering the adoption of 

new technologies and driving competitiveness in the supply chain sector.

By investing in and promoting education and workforce development focused on IoT, the government 

can cultivate a skilled talent pool that is capable of navigating the complex challenges associated with 

IoT adoption, ultimately supporting the growth and success of the supply chain industry.

Justification:

The justification for the recommendation to invest in education and workforce development in the 

context of IoT adoption in supply chain management lies in the need to prepare the workforce for the 

technological advancements and skills required in the rapidly evolving industry. The main reasons for 

this recommendation are:

1. Addressing skills gap: The increasing adoption of IoT technologies in supply chain management 

will create a demand for workers with specialized knowledge and skills. Investing in education 

and workforce development can help address this skills gap, ensuring that companies have 

access to the talent they need to successfully implement IoT solutions.

2. Enhancing competitiveness: A well-trained and skilled workforce is a key factor in the 

competitiveness of the manufacturing sector. By investing in education and workforce 

development, the government can help businesses stay ahead of international competition and 

maintain a strong position in the global market.

3. Fostering innovation: A skilled workforce with a strong foundation in IoT technologies can drive 

innovation in supply chain management. By investing in education and training programs, the 

government can foster a culture of innovation and support the development of cutting-edge 

solutions.

4. Supporting digital transformation: As the manufacturing sector undergoes digital 

transformation, businesses need to adapt their operations and processes to incorporate new 

technologies, such as IoT. Investing in education and workforce development will equip workers 
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

with the necessary skills to navigate this transition and support the successful integration of IoT 

solutions in supply chains.

5. Encouraging job creation: IoT adoption in supply chain management can create new job 

opportunities in fields such as data analysis, software development, and cybersecurity. By 

investing in education and workforce development, the government can ensure that workers 

are prepared to take advantage of these opportunities, supporting economic growth and job 

creation.

6. Promoting social inclusion: Education and workforce development programs can help promote 

social inclusion by ensuring that underrepresented and disadvantaged groups have access to the 

skills and training they need to participate in the IoT-driven job market.

7. Ensuring long-term sustainability: As the manufacturing sector continues to evolve, businesses 

will need to adapt to new technologies and industry trends. By investing in education and 

workforce development, the government can help ensure the long-term sustainability of the 

manufacturing sector and support businesses in their ongoing efforts to adopt and integrate IoT 

technologies in their supply chains.

Implementation Considerations:

Implementation considerations for investing in education and workforce development for supply chain 

IoT adoption include:

1. Identifying skill requirements: Conduct a thorough analysis of the specific skills and expertise 

needed to support IoT adoption in supply chain management, including technical, analytical, and 

managerial competencies.

2. Developing targeted curricula: Collaborate with educational institutions, industry stakeholders, 

and training providers to develop targeted curricula and training programs that address the 

identified skill requirements.

3. Expanding access to education and training: Implement policies and programs that ensure broad 

access to IoT-focused education and training, including financial aid, scholarships, and online 

learning options to reach underserved communities.

4. Encouraging industry-academia partnerships: Promote partnerships between industry and 

educational institutions to facilitate real-world learning experiences, internships, and 

collaborative research projects.

5. Focusing on reskilling and upskilling: Implement programs to reskill and upskill the existing 

workforce, enabling them to adapt to the changing requirements of IoT-driven supply chain 

management.

6. Promoting STEM education: Encourage interest in science, technology, engineering, and 

mathematics (STEM) education from an early age, laying the foundation for future workforce 

development in the IoT field.

7. Establishing performance metrics: Develop performance metrics and evaluation methods to 

assess the effectiveness of education and workforce development initiatives and make datadriven improvements as needed.

Potential implementation barriers:

Possible barriers to implementing this recommendation include:
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

1. Insufficient funding: Limited resources may constrain the government's ability to invest in 

education and workforce development programs at the desired scale.

2. Resistance to change: Some industry stakeholders may resist investing in new training and 

education programs due to concerns about costs, time constraints, or disruption to existing 

processes.

3. Difficulty in identifying skill requirements: Rapidly evolving technologies and market dynamics 

may make it challenging to accurately identify the specific skills needed for IoT adoption in 

supply chain management.

4. Skills mismatch: A mismatch between the skills taught in educational institutions and the skills 

required by industry can limit the effectiveness of education and workforce development 

initiatives.

Possible participating agencies:

Federal agencies that may be impacted by this recommendation include the Department of Education, 

the Department of Labor, the National Science Foundation, and the Department of Commerce.

Federal considerations:

The federal government should consider allocating sufficient resources, fostering collaboration between 

industry and academia, ensuring broad access to education and training, focusing on reskilling and 

upskilling, promoting STEM education, and continuously evaluating and improving the effectiveness of 

education and workforce development programs in order to successfully implement this 

recommendation.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

Recommendation 6: The federal government should consider strengthening cybersecurity measures.

Description:

The recommendation to strengthen cybersecurity measures focused on IoT across supply chain 

networks aims to address the growing concerns around data privacy, security, and the potential risks 

associated with the increased connectivity and interdependence of IoT systems. By implementing robust 

cybersecurity measures, the government can help ensure that businesses can confidently adopt IoT 

technologies in their supply chain operations without compromising the security and integrity of their 

networks and data.

Strengthening cybersecurity measures involves promoting the development and adoption of security 

best practices, guidelines, and standards specifically tailored to IoT systems in supply chain 

management. This includes securing data transmission, storage, and access, as well as protecting IoT 

devices and networks from unauthorized access, manipulation, and cyberattacks.

To implement this recommendation, the government should collaborate with industry stakeholders, 

cybersecurity experts, and technology providers to identify potential vulnerabilities and develop 

appropriate solutions that address the unique security challenges associated with IoT systems in supply 

chain operations. Additionally, the government should support research and development efforts aimed 

at advancing cybersecurity technologies and solutions tailored for IoT environments.

Training and awareness programs should also be promoted to ensure that businesses and professionals 

understand the importance of IoT security and are equipped with the knowledge and skills required to 

protect their systems and data. By strengthening cybersecurity measures focused on IoT across supply 

chain networks, the government can foster trust in IoT technologies and enable businesses to fully 

leverage their potential benefits while minimizing risks.

Justification:

The justification for the recommendation to strengthen cybersecurity measures in the context of IoT 

adoption in supply chain management lies in the increasing reliance on interconnected systems and 

devices, which may expose organizations to a higher risk of cyber threats. The main reasons for this 

recommendation are:

1. Protecting sensitive data: IoT devices and systems in supply chains generate and transmit vast 

amounts of data, including sensitive information about products, inventory, and logistics. 

Strengthening cybersecurity measures helps protect this data from unauthorized access, theft, 

or manipulation.

2. Ensuring operational continuity: Cyberattacks on IoT systems can disrupt supply chain 

operations, leading to delays, losses, and reputational damage. Enhanced cybersecurity 

measures help ensure the reliability and continuity of supply chain processes.

3. Maintaining trust: Trust is essential for the smooth functioning of supply chains, as organizations 

share sensitive information and collaborate on various processes. Strengthening cybersecurity 

measures helps maintain trust between supply chain partners by ensuring the confidentiality, 

integrity, and availability of data.

4. Compliance with regulations: As regulations related to data protection and cybersecurity evolve, 

organizations must ensure they meet the necessary requirements. Strengthening cybersecurity 

measures allows businesses to comply with these regulations and avoid potential legal and 

financial penalties.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

5. Enhancing competitiveness: Organizations with strong cybersecurity measures in place are 

better positioned to compete in the global market, as they can assure their customers and 

partners of the safety and reliability of their supply chain operations.

6. Addressing evolving threats: As cyber threats become more sophisticated and targeted, 

organizations must continuously adapt and update their cybersecurity measures to stay ahead 

of potential attackers.

7. Fostering innovation: A secure environment enables organizations to safely experiment with 

new IoT technologies and solutions without the fear of exposing their systems and data to cyber 

risks. Strengthening cybersecurity measures, therefore, fosters innovation in supply chain 

management.

Implementation Considerations:

Implementation considerations for strengthening cybersecurity measures for supply chain include:

1. Develop a comprehensive cybersecurity framework: Create a framework that addresses various 

aspects of supply chain cybersecurity, including risk assessment, threat monitoring, incident 

response, and recovery plans.

2. Promote the adoption of best practices and standards: Encourage organizations to adopt 

industry best practices and internationally recognized standards, such as the NIST Cybersecurity 

Framework and the ISO/IEC 27000 series.

3. Encourage information sharing: Facilitate the sharing of threat intelligence, vulnerabilities, and 

best practices among supply chain partners and industry stakeholders to improve collective 

defense against cyber threats.

4. Invest in security technologies: Promote the adoption of advanced security technologies, such as 

encryption, intrusion detection systems, and artificial intelligence-based solutions, to protect IoT 

devices and systems.

5. Implement security-by-design principles: Encourage organizations to adopt a security-by-design 

approach, integrating cybersecurity considerations into the design and development of IoT 

devices and systems.

6. Raise awareness and provide training: Develop programs to raise awareness of supply chain 

cybersecurity risks and provide training for organizations and their workforce.

Potential implementation barriers:

Possible barriers to implementing this recommendation include:

1. Limited resources: Organizations may face resource constraints, including financial, technical, 

and human resources, which may limit their ability to strengthen cybersecurity measures.

2. Complexity of supply chains: The complexity of global supply chains, with numerous 

interconnected partners and systems, may make it challenging to implement comprehensive 

cybersecurity measures.

3. Resistance to information sharing: Organizations may be hesitant to share information about 

vulnerabilities or incidents due to concerns about revealing competitive information or 

damaging their reputation.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

4. Evolving threats: Cyber threats are continuously evolving, which may make it difficult for 

organizations to stay ahead of potential attackers.

Possible participating agencies:

Federal agencies that may be impacted by this recommendation include the Department of Homeland 

Security (DHS), the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the Department of 

Commerce, and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Federal considerations:

The federal government should consider the following in implementing this recommendation:

1. Develop and promote the adoption of a comprehensive cybersecurity framework tailored to 

supply chain IoT adoption.

2. Support research and development efforts in security technologies and solutions.

3. Allocate resources to facilitate training and awareness programs.

4. Encourage collaboration and information sharing among industry stakeholders and government 

agencies.

5. Continuously monitor and update cybersecurity policies, regulations, and best practices to adapt 

to the evolving threat landscape.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

Recommendation 7: The federal government should promote international collaboration.

Description:

The recommendation to promote international collaboration in IoT adoption across global supply chains 

aims to facilitate the sharing of knowledge, best practices, and resources between countries and 

regions, driving innovation and accelerating the widespread adoption of IoT technologies in supply chain 

operations worldwide. By engaging in international collaboration, governments can foster a global 

ecosystem that supports the development and deployment of IoT solutions, overcoming challenges 

related to interoperability, standardization, and regulatory compliance.

Promoting international collaboration involves creating platforms and forums where policymakers, 

industry stakeholders, technology providers, and researchers from different countries can come 

together to exchange ideas, discuss common challenges, and explore opportunities for joint projects and 

initiatives. This can lead to the development of harmonized regulations, standards, and guidelines that 

enable seamless integration of IoT systems across borders, fostering efficient and resilient global supply 

chain networks.

In addition, international collaboration can facilitate the pooling of resources and expertise to support 

research and development efforts, pilot projects, and capacity-building initiatives aimed at promoting 

IoT adoption in supply chain management. This can help bridge the digital divide between developed 

and developing countries, ensuring that businesses worldwide have access to the tools and technologies 

needed to harness the potential of IoT in their supply chain operations.

To implement this recommendation, the government should actively engage with international 

partners, participate in relevant forums and organizations, and seek opportunities to collaborate on IoTrelated projects and initiatives. By promoting international collaboration in IoT adoption across global 

supply chains, the government can contribute to the development of a connected and resilient global 

supply chain ecosystem that benefits businesses and consumers alike.

Justification:

The justification for the recommendation to promote international collaboration in the context of IoT 

adoption in supply chain management lies in the inherently global nature of supply chains and the need 

for a coordinated approach to address common challenges. The main reasons for promoting 

international collaboration are:

1. Global nature of supply chains: Modern supply chains often involve multiple countries, making it 

essential for governments and organizations to collaborate across borders to ensure seamless, 

efficient, and secure operations.

2. Harmonization of standards and regulations: International collaboration can help develop and 

promote the adoption of common standards, protocols, and regulations, which can reduce 

inconsistencies and friction between countries, making it easier for organizations to operate 

globally.

3. Addressing global cyber threats: Cyber threats are not limited by geographical boundaries; 

therefore, international collaboration can enable the sharing of threat intelligence, best 

practices, and resources, improving collective defense against cyber attacks.

4. Leveraging global expertise: Collaborating with international partners allows countries to benefit 

from the expertise, technologies, and best practices developed by others, leading to more 

effective and efficient IoT adoption in supply chain management.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

5. Fostering innovation: International collaboration can stimulate innovation by enabling the 

exchange of ideas, knowledge, and technologies among countries, research institutions, and 

businesses.

6. Building trust: Working together on common challenges can help build trust between countries, 

which is crucial for the smooth functioning of global supply chains.

7. Addressing social and environmental challenges: International collaboration can help address 

global social and environmental issues related to supply chain management, such as labor rights, 

environmental sustainability, and resource management.

Implementation Considerations:

Implementation considerations for promoting international collaboration for supply chain include:

1. Establish bilateral and multilateral agreements: Form strategic partnerships with key countries 

to facilitate collaboration on IoT-related supply chain initiatives, standards, and best practices.

2. Participate in international forums and organizations: Engage in existing forums and 

organizations dedicated to supply chain management, IoT, and cybersecurity to contribute to 

and benefit from global discussions and initiatives.

3. Share information and best practices: Promote the exchange of information, threat intelligence, 

and best practices related to IoT adoption and supply chain security among international 

partners.

4. Collaborate on research and development: Engage in joint research and development projects 

with international partners to foster innovation and develop new technologies for supply chain 

management.

5. Promote capacity building: Support capacity-building initiatives and programs to help countries 

strengthen their IoT infrastructure, develop relevant skills, and improve supply chain 

management practices.

6. Identify key international partners: Assess which countries are critical for collaboration based on 

their role in global supply chains, technological capabilities, and mutual strategic interests.

7. Leverage existing diplomatic channels: Utilize existing diplomatic relationships to initiate 

dialogue and cooperation on IoT adoption in supply chain management.

8. Coordinate with relevant federal agencies: Ensure that all relevant federal agencies are involved 

in the development and implementation of international collaboration initiatives.

Potential implementation barriers:

Possible barriers to implementing this recommendation:

1. Differing priorities and interests: Different countries may have varying priorities and interests, 

which could make it challenging to align objectives and collaborate effectively.

2. Trust and data privacy concerns: Sharing sensitive information and best practices may be 

hindered by trust and data privacy concerns among collaborating countries.

3. Regulatory and legal barriers: Differences in regulations, standards, and legal frameworks may 

impede collaboration efforts and create challenges in harmonizing policies.

Possible participating agencies:
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

Federal agencies that may be impacted by this recommendation include the Department of State, the 

Department of Commerce, the Department of Homeland Security, the National Institute of Standards 

and Technology, and the Federal Trade Commission.

Federal considerations:

1. Align collaboration efforts with national priorities and interests while respecting the priorities of 

partner countries.

2. Develop clear objectives and mutually beneficial goals for international collaboration initiatives.

3. Ensure effective communication and coordination among relevant federal agencies and 

international partners.

4. Establish mechanisms for monitoring and evaluating the progress and effectiveness of 

collaboration efforts.

5. Remain adaptable and responsive to the evolving global landscape and emerging challenges in 

IoT adoption and supply chain management.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

Recommendations 8: The federal government should monitor and evaluate progress.

Description:

The recommendation to monitor and evaluate progress aims to ensure that IoT adoption efforts in 

supply chain management are on track, effectively addressing the identified challenges and 

opportunities, and delivering the desired outcomes. By regularly monitoring and evaluating the progress 

of IoT implementation, the government can identify areas of improvement, assess the impact of its 

policies and initiatives, and make informed decisions to optimize its strategies and investments in the 

future.

Monitoring and evaluating progress involves establishing a set of measurable indicators and targets that 

reflect the key objectives and desired outcomes of IoT adoption in supply chain management. These 

indicators may include the level of IoT technology adoption, efficiency gains, cost reductions, 

improvements in transparency and traceability, and advancements in cybersecurity, among others.

To implement this recommendation, the government should develop a comprehensive framework for 

data collection, analysis, and reporting, which includes input from industry stakeholders, technology 

providers, and relevant government agencies. Regular assessments should be conducted to track the 

progress of IoT adoption against the established targets, identify any gaps or challenges, and evaluate 

the effectiveness of the implemented policies and initiatives.

Based on the findings of these assessments, the government should adapt its strategies and actions to 

address the identified issues, optimize resource allocation, and maximize the impact of its efforts. By 

monitoring and evaluating progress, the government can ensure that its approach to driving IoT 

adoption in supply chain management remains agile, responsive, and results-oriented, ultimately 

contributing to the long-term success and competitiveness of the industry.

Justification:

The justification for the recommendation to monitor and evaluate progress in IoT adoption for supply 

chain management stems from the need to ensure the effectiveness of implemented strategies, 

measure their impact, and identify areas for improvement. Regular monitoring and evaluation are 

crucial for several reasons:

1. Assess effectiveness: Monitoring and evaluation help determine whether the implemented 

strategies and policies are achieving their intended goals and objectives.

2. Measure impact: Assessing the impact of IoT adoption in supply chain management is essential 

to understand the benefits, such as efficiency improvements, cost savings, and enhanced 

resilience.

3. Identify areas for improvement: By evaluating progress, the government can identify 

weaknesses or gaps in the implementation of IoT adoption strategies, enabling targeted 

improvements and adjustments to ensure better outcomes.

4. Allocate resources efficiently: Monitoring and evaluation provide insights into the effectiveness 

of various initiatives, helping the government make informed decisions on resource allocation 

and prioritize investments in areas with the most significant potential impact.

5. Enhance accountability: Regular assessment of progress helps ensure transparency and 

accountability for the government and other stakeholders involved in IoT adoption and supply 

chain management.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

6. Facilitate knowledge sharing: Monitoring and evaluating progress can generate valuable 

knowledge and insights that can be shared with other stakeholders, helping to improve 

practices and drive further innovation in the field.

7. Inform future strategies: The insights gained from monitoring and evaluating progress can 

inform the development of future policies and strategies, ensuring they are more effective and 

better aligned with the evolving needs of supply chain management.

Implementation Considerations:

Implementation considerations for monitoring and evaluating progress for supply chain include:

1. Establish clear goals and objectives: Define specific, measurable, and time-bound goals and 

objectives for IoT adoption in supply chain management to enable effective monitoring and 

evaluation.

2. Develop relevant performance indicators: Identify key performance indicators (KPIs) that reflect 

the desired outcomes of IoT adoption and can be used to measure progress and impact.

3. Implement data collection and reporting mechanisms: Set up systems and processes for 

collecting, storing, and analyzing data related to IoT adoption and supply chain performance.

4. Conduct periodic assessments: Schedule regular evaluations of progress and impact, using the 

collected data and KPIs to assess the effectiveness of IoT initiatives in supply chain management.

5. Foster a culture of continuous improvement: Encourage feedback and learning from monitoring 

and evaluation results, using the insights to improve and refine policies and initiatives.

6. Collaborate with stakeholders: Engage with industry, academia, and other relevant stakeholders 

to gather their insights and perspectives, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of progress 

and challenges.

7. Assign responsibility: Designate a lead federal agency or interagency group responsible for 

overseeing the monitoring and evaluation process for IoT adoption in supply chain 

management.

8. Develop a monitoring and evaluation plan: Create a detailed plan outlining the goals, objectives, 

KPIs, data collection methods, and evaluation schedule.

9. Allocate resources: Ensure adequate financial, human, and technical resources are allocated to 

support monitoring and evaluation activities.

Potential implementation barriers:

Possible barriers to implementing this recommendation:

1. Lack of clear goals and objectives: Ambiguous or poorly defined goals can make it difficult to 

assess progress and impact.

2. Inadequate data collection and reporting mechanisms: Ineffective systems for collecting, 

storing, and analyzing data can hinder accurate and reliable monitoring and evaluation.

3. Resource constraints: Limited resources can impede the government's ability to conduct 

thorough and consistent monitoring and evaluation.

4. Resistance to change: Stakeholders may resist sharing information or adopting new practices 

based on evaluation results, limiting the impact of monitoring and evaluation efforts.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

Possible participating agencies:

Federal agencies that may be impacted by this recommendation include the Department of Commerce, 

the Department of Transportation, the Department of Homeland Security, the National Institute of 

Standards and Technology, and the Federal Trade Commission.

Federal considerations:

1. Ensure clear communication of goals, objectives, and expectations related to monitoring and 

evaluating progress in IoT adoption for supply chain management.

2. Collaborate with relevant stakeholders to gather their perspectives and insights, promoting a 

more comprehensive understanding of progress and challenges.

3. Be transparent in sharing the results of monitoring and evaluation, fostering trust and 

accountability among stakeholders.

4. Remain adaptable and responsive to new information and insights, using the results of 

monitoring and evaluation to continuously refine and improve policies and initiatives.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

Recommendation 9: The federal government should select the most appropriate mix of policies, 

incentives, and requirements to support sustainable and scalable growth in the domestic IoT 

manufacturing supply chain. 

Description:

These policies, incentives, and requirements are particularly relevant in the transportation sector as that

becomes increasingly connected, electric, shared, integrated, seamless, and ultimately autonomous. 

Rapid advances in transportation technologies are already occurring that are further augmented by 

several communication and information technologies, including the Internet of Things (IoT). In addition, 

the sector is becoming increasingly electrified. The recommendations in this section can apply to all 

aspects of domestic IoT manufacturing.

Justification:

American manufacturers share the goal of fostering and strengthening domestic manufacturing and 

supply chain capabilities. With the recent influx of federal funding and executive orders in this sector, 

there is an increasing trend to support the “Buy American” concept Ensuring the Future Is Made in All of 

America by All of America's Workers. The justification for an appropriate mix of policies, incentives, and 

requirements to support sustainable and scalable growth in the domestic manufacturing supply chain 

market is provided below: 

1. Absent significant time to build new manufacturing capacity, develop new supply chains, and 

train workers, tighter domestic preference requirements could create supply constraints and 

prevent the manufacturers from meeting even modest deployment goals.

2. In some cases, U.S. manufacturing capacity cannot meet increased demand that would be 

sparked by anticipated federal investment/incentives let alone current domestic demand.

3. In some cases, there are no domestic alternatives for components and subcomponents, limiting 

the ability of equipment providers to control their domestic content. US Manufacturers cannot 

force their component and subcomponent suppliers to relocate facilities to the U.S.

4. Compliance with federal domestic preference requirements is time consuming and costly 

particularly when it comes to the country of origin of components and subcomponents. This 

burden will increase as subcomponents become smaller and more integrated.

Implementation Considerations:

Implementation considerations for fostering and strengthening domestic manufacturing and supply 

chain capabilities include:

1. Phasing in domestic contact requirements. An extended phase in period is necessary in order to 

avoid supply shortages and provide domestic manufacturers and their suppliers with sufficient 

time to develop domestic manufacturing capabilities, build up supply chains, and train their 

workforce.

2. Accelerate domestic manufacturing with an investment tax credit for associated capital costs.

3. Provide clear rules governing domestic content requirements, including guidelines on how they 

apply across all funding and procurement programs. Further, this guidance should also be 

provided to implementing state agencies.

4. Avoid any rules that require determining the country of origin of subcomponents integrated into 

larger domestically manufactured components.
DRAFT – Supply Chain Logistics Recommendations

5. The component test should include all costs associated with the manufacturing of a product, 

such as labor, transportation, allocable overhead, and material. And clearly designate that the 

domestic labor used in the final assembly of a product is included in the component test.

6. Allow 100% of manufacture value added (MVA) or substantial transformation to be classified as 

domestic content in component tests.

7. Countries should be designated outside of the US from which materials and components can be 

procured and the component test for products substantially transformed in one of these 

acceptable countries can be waived. These could be countries that the US already has 

established trade agreements with such as: USMCA countries, European Union member states, 

The United Kingdom, and Indo-Pacific

Potential implementation barriers:

Possible barriers to implementing this recommendation:

1. Current Supply Chain constraints meeting domestic content requirements - while there are a 

number of North American manufacturing plants for EV components particularly batteries being 

developed and constructed, there is a ramp up time to get to full production. 

2. Funding constraints: There is a huge initial capital cost investment to build up new domestic 

manufacturing plants.

3. Resource constraints: There will need to be an influx of skilled engineers and technicians to 

support this domestic buildup.

Possible participating agencies:

Federal agencies that may be impacted by this recommendation include the Department of Commerce, 

the Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, the National Highway Traffic Safety 

Association, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology.