alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21
 Direct and Indirect Subsidiaries, and Operating Divisions,
of Myers Industries, Inc.  As of December 31, 2008
 North and Central American Operations
 Ameri-Kart Corp.
    
    Kansas WEK South Corp
    
    North CarolinaAmeri-Kart (MI) Corp.
    
    MichiganBuckhorn Inc.
    
    Ohio Buckhorn Rubber Products Inc.
    
    MissouriGrower Express Trucking, Inc.
    
    OhioJMKO Corp.
    
    Missouri AC Buckhorn LLC (50%)
    
    MissouriLone Star Plastics, Inc.
    
    Nevada Amerikan LLC (50%)
    
    Florida Kord USA, Inc.
    
    South Carolina Texan Polymer Group, Inc.
    
    Texas WhiteRidge Plastics, LLC
    
    North CarolinaMYE Automotive, Inc.
    
    Delaware Michigan Rubber Products, Inc.
    
    Michigan WEK Industries, Inc.
    
    DelawareMYE Canada Operations Inc.
    
    CanadaMYEcap Financial Corp.
    
    OhioMYELux, LLC
    
    OhioMyers do Brasil Embalagens Plasticas Ltda.
    
    BrazilMyers Tire Supply International, Inc.
    
    Ohio Myers de El Salvador S.A. De C.V. (75%)
    
    El Salvador Orientadores Comerciales S.A.
    
    Guatemala Myers de Panama S.A.
    
    Panama Myers TSCA, S.A.
    
    PanamaMyers de El Salvador S.A. De C.V. (25%)
    
    El SalvadorMyers Missouri, Inc.
    
    Missouri AC Buckhorn LLC (50%)
    
    MissouriMyers Tire Supply Distribution, Inc.
    
    OhioMyers Tire Supply.com, Inc.
    
    OhioPatch Rubber Company
    
    North Carolina Kwik Patch Private Ltd. (39.98%)
    
    IndiaProductivity California, Inc.
    
    California




---



##### 



EXHIBIT 21 continued
 Direct and Indirect Subsidiaries, and Operating Divisions,
of Myers Industries, Inc.  As of December 31, 2008
 Reported Operating Divisions of Myers Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 Akro-Mils (of Myers Industries, Inc.)
    
    Akron, OhioDillen Products (of Myers Industries, Inc.)
    
    Middlefield, OhioMolded Solutions (of Buckhorn Rubber Products Inc.)
    
    Mebane, NCMyers Tire Supply (of Myers Industries, Inc.)
    
    Akron, OhioBuckhorn Canada (of MYE Canada Operations Inc.)
    
    Ontario, CanadaMyers Tire Supply of
Canada (of MYE Canada Operations Inc.)
    
    Ontario, CanadaListo Products (of MYE
Canada Operations Inc.)
    
    Yukon TerritoryITML Horticultural
Products (of MYE Canada Operations Inc.)
    
    Ontario, Canada
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR NATIONAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES, FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                           5,174
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,740
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,821
<PP&E>                                         167,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                (87,836)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 235,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,058
<BONDS>                                         24,535
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           461
<OTHER-SE>                                     127,737
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   235,260
<SALES>                                        296,136
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               358,976
<CGS>                                          180,392
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  222,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                96,979
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,009
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,259
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,259
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.42
        

</TABLE>
|    |                                                                                 |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of GP Strategies Corporation; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |
| Date: April 30, 2018    |
|                    |
| /s/ Scott N. Greenberg  |
| Scott N. Greenberg      |
| Chief Executive Officer |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MARCUS ORLANDO TATE, : 

a/k/a MARCUS ORLANDO TAITE, 

a/k/a DR. ELIJAH JOSHUA : 

MUHAMMAD, II, a/k/a DRELIJAH 

JOSHUA MUHAMMAD, : 

Plaintiff, : 

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 10-0211-WS-N 

CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS, et al., : 

Defendants. : 

 

 ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to 

the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) is 

ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is further ORDERED that this action be and 

is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g). 

 DONE this 27th day of July, 2010. 

 s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:10-cv-00211-WS-N Document 8 Filed 07/27/10 Page 1 of 1
Paul Zielinski

Director, NIST Technology Partnerships Office

Paul Zielinski is the Director of the Technology Partnerships Office (TPO) at 

the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). TPO serves as the 

Office of Technology and Research Applications for NIST and is responsible 

for NIST technology transfer activities including patents, licenses, cooperative 

research, and small business innovation research.

In addition, Paul is the current Chair of the Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer and 

coordinates the Interagency Workgroup on Technology Transfer that addresses technology transfer 

policy issues.

Prior to joining NIST, Paul worked at the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Energy, 

private industry, and served on active duty as a commissioned officer in the United States Army. Paul 

has Master of Science degree in engineering and Master of Business Administration.
blob:https://www.fdms.gov/e9534759-01e3-444b-b023-e70cd082b191 1/1

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 3/23/22 8:01 PM

Received: March 22, 2022

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. l12-jpsa-b9c0

Comments Due: April 25, 2022

Submission Type: Web

Docket: NIST-2022-0001

Evaluating and Improving NIST Cybersecurity Resources: The Cybersecurity Framework and

Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management

Comment On: NIST-2022-0001-0001

RFI-2022-03642

Document: NIST-2022-0001-DRAFT-0015

Comment on FR Doc # N/A

Submitter Information

Organization: Validato

General Comment

Validato.io is a security controls validation platform that uses attack simulations based on MITRE

ATT&CK techniques to test the effectiveness of security controls. The unbiased attack simulation results

data is then mapped back to the NIST CSF framework. Validato is designed to provide CISOs and risk

professionals with clear performance data on how they are able to protect against, detect and respond to

cyber threats.

Expanding the attack simulation use case to test vendor and supplier security control effectiveness would

be a logical next step. Validato would be open to collaborating with NIST to contribute to the creation of a

workable and open standard to test and measure supply chain resilience to cyber threats.
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF NASH-FINCH COMPANY
As of December 30, 2006
 Subsidiary
    
    State ofCorporation
    
    IncorporationEricksons Diversified Corporation
    
    WisconsinGTL Truck Lines, Inc.
    
    NebraskaHinky Dinky Supermarkets, Inc.
    
    NebraskaSuper Food Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareT.J. Morris Company
    
    GeorgiaU Save Foods, Inc.
    
    NebraskaNFCG, LLC
    
    DelawarePiggly Wiggly Northland Corporation
    
    MinnesotaNash Finch Funding Corp.
    
    Delaware
 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 23-1









INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-16285 of Michigan Consolidated Gas Company on Form S-3 of our report dated
February 7, 1997 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation"), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Michigan
Consolidated Gas Company for the year ended December 31, 1996.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Detroit, Michigan
February 28, 1997
Exhibit
      32





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Bay National Corporation
      (the “Company”) each certifies that to the best of his knowledge the Annual
      Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and information contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/Hugh
      W. Mohler





Hugh
      W.
      Mohler


Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer


March
      28,
      2007








/s/
      Mark
      A. Semanie





Mark
      A.
      Semanie


Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


March
      28,
      2007





This
      certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
      is
      not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document,
      and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any reason
      other
      than as specifically required by law.
Exhibit 10.9

 



 

March 13, 2015

 

Mr. Jonathan Peacock

 

Subject:  Amendment to Employment Agreement

 

Dear Jon:

 

This letter represents an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2014, between you and Bellerophon Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Employment Agreement”).

 

Section 3(b) of the Employment Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

“Annual Bonus.  For each calendar year ending during the Employment Period, the Executive shall be eligible to earn an annual bonus payable in accordance with the terms of the Company’s management incentive program, to be established and implemented in consultation with the Executive, at a target of 100% of Annual Base Salary, or such higher level established by the Company from time to time (the “Annual Bonus”).  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Executive’s Annual Bonus for calendar year 2014 shall be a pro-rated portion of the Annual Bonus based on the number of days actually worked in 2014.  Beginning with the Annual Bonus in respect of calendar year 2014 and for years thereafter, the Company, in its sole discretion, may pay such bonus in cash or equity or a combination thereof, in each instance on such terms as are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.  With respect to any equity awards granted to the Executive in respect of the calendar year 2014 Annual Bonus, if the Executive is terminated without Cause (as defined in the applicable award agreement) by the Company within the twelve (12) month period following the grant of such equity award, then the equity award shall vest in full as of the date of such termination of employment.”

 

All other terms of the Employment Agreement will remain the same.

 

The Employment Agreement, as supplemented and modified by this Amendment, constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the parties thereto with respect to the subject matter thereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings relating to such subject matter.

 

 

	
/s/ Manesh Naidu
    	
 
    
	
Manesh Naidu
    	
 
    
	
Chief Business Officer
    	
 
    


 

53 Frontage Road, Suite 301, Hampton, NJ 08827 | 908-574-4770 |  bellerophon.com

 











 

I acknowledge and accept the above amendment to my Employment Agreement as of the date first set forth above.

 

 

	
/s/ Jonathan M. Peacock
    	
 
    
	
Jonathan M. Peacock
    	
 
    
	
President and Chief Executive   Officer
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Bay National Corporation
(the "Company") certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the quarter
ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and information contained in that
Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Mark A. Semanie

Mark A. Semanie
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 26, 2003


This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.



                                       88
<PAGE>
SIM Workshop on Comparison Analysis

SIM Photometry and Radiometry Working Group 

19 – 20 May 2016 – Gaithersburg, MD

Thursday, May 19

8:00 a.m. Registration

8:30 a.m. Safety Remarks and Introductions

8:50 a.m. Welcome – NIST Representatives (Gerald Fraser and Claire Saundry)

9:10 a.m. CCPR – Consultative Committee for Photometry and Radiometry (Maria Nadal, NIST)

9:45 a.m. Fundamentals of Radiometry – CCPR Key Comparisons K1, K2 (Howard Yoon, NIST)

10:45 a.m. Break

11:00 a.m. Fundamentals of Photometry – CCPR Key Comparisons K3, K4 (Yuqin Zong, NIST)

12:00 Lunch

1:00 p.m.

Fundamentals of Spectrophotometry – CCPR Key Comparisons K5, K6 (Joanne

Zwinkels, NRC Canada)

2:00 p.m.

Uncertainty analysis – Key Comparison Reference Value, KCRV and Degree of

Equivalence, DoE (Antonio Possolo, NIST)

3:00 p.m. Break

3:30 p.m. CCPR Guidelines: G5, G6 on RMO Comparison Linkage (Yoshi Ohno, NIST)

Friday, May 20

8:30 a.m. SIM Quality Task Force and the NIST Quality System (Catherine Cooksey, NIST)

9:30 a.m.

Calibration Measurement Capabilities, CMCs Review Process – From Submission to Final

Approval (Douglas Olson, BIPM and NIST)

10:30 a.m. Break

10:45 a.m. Examples of SIM Comparisons (Howard Yoon and Maria Nadal)

11:30 a.m. MW2 meeting (SIM members)

12:30 Lunch

1:30 – 4:00

NISTLaboratoryTours:

Spectrophotometry, Photometry, and Radiometry
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 99.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Leonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of Morgan's Foods, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended
              March 2, 2003, (the "Report"), which this certification
              accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

                              /s/ Leonard R. Stein-Sapir
                              --------------------------------------------------
                               Leonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board and
                               Chief Executive Officer
May 30, 2003
#### Harold MCGUIRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, INC. Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-5169.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 25, 2001.

*339Before NORRIS and COLE, Circuit Judges; and STEEH, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable George Caram Steeh, III, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-Appellant Harold McGuire (“McGuire”) initiated a lawsuit against his former employer, Defendant-Appellee Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc. (“Lowe’s”), setting forth an age discrimination claim under the Kentucky Civil Rights Act (“KCRA”). Specifically, he alleged that Lowe’s awarded him a lower raise than that to which he was entitled; failed to promote him to a position for which he was qualified (and promoted instead a younger employee); and demoted and transferred him to another Lowe’s store. The district court concluded that McGuire had failed to set forth a prima facie case as to any of his claims, and, in the alternative, that even assuming he could establish a prima facie case, he had failed to rebut Lowe’s legitimate, nondiseriminatory reasons for its employment actions. Upon so finding, the district court granted Lowe’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed McGuire’s complaint. McGuire now appeals from that dismissal and the district court’s January 19, 2000, order, denying his motion to alter, amend, or vacate the district court’s earlier judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.CivJP. 59(e).

Having carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Lowe’s or in denying McGuire’s motion to alter, amend, or vacate the district court’s judgment. Because the district court carefully analyzed the law, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this Court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED upon the reasoning of that court in its written opinion filed July 15,1999.
EX-4.10



 Exhibit 4.10 
 



 
  
 JT 1335
1⁄2 
 COPYRIGHT 1930 BY 
 DWIGHT & M.H JACKSON 
 CHICAGO 

PATENT PENOING 
 NUMBER 
 SHARES 

Incorporated under the Laws 
 of the State of Delaware 
 NANOSPHERE, INC.

 4,400 Authorized Series A Convertible Preferred Shares $0.01 Par Value Per Share 

This Certifies that is the owner of full paid and non-assessable SHARES OF THE SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK OF
NANOSPHERE, INC. 
 transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly
authorized Attorney upon the surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 
 The corporation will furnish
without charge to each stockholder who so requests, the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of
such preferences and/or rights. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the Seal of the Corporation, this day of A.D. 

Secretary 
 President 







 



 
  
 For Value
Received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto Shares represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 
 Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 

Dated 
 In presence of 
 NOTICE THE SIGNATURE TO THIS
ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER 
 THIS SPACE IS NOT TO BE 
 COVERED IN ANY WAY
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAN J. QUALE, :

Plaintiff, :

v. : CIVIL ACTION NO.: 09-0519-CG-M

UNIFUND CCR PARTNERS, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and entered on January 28, 2010, (Doc.

36) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this court. It is ORDERED that Defendant National City

Bank NA’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 24) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s

Complaint be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendant National City Bank,

NA.

DONE and ORDERED this 30th day of March, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00519-CG-M Document 38 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 1
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00093

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF D.R., R.R., A.R.,

AND J.R., C HILDREN §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 231st District Court

of Tar r ant County ( 231

- 713175

- 22 )

September 14, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment o f the trial

court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellants B.R. and D.T. must pay all costs of th is

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Mike Wallach

___________________ Justice Mike Wallach
11300.

#### Carroll *v.*Upchurch.

Decided September 17, 1920.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—‘Judge Pendleton. December 16, 1919.

*James & Bedgood, John H. Hudson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Guy Parker,*contra.

Jenkins, P. J.

“ An answer to a certiorari must be filed on the first day of the term to which it is made returnable, unless further time be given. After the adjournment of the term it is too late to pass an order allowing further time within which to file the answer. It is the duty of the plaintiff in certiorari, during the first term, to discover that no answer has been filed, and to take an order requiring it to be filed within some specified time.” *J. M. High Co.*v. *Ga. Ry. & Power Co.,*12 *Ga. App.*505 (77 S. E. 588); Civil Code (1910), § 5195. The court did not err in dismissing the certiorari in this ease.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.*