alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ex-99.4 Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distribution to
Certificatesholders.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Class      Interest        Principle         Losses       Ending Balance
------------- -------------- ---------------- ------------- ------------------
A1                                                             119,836,278.62
               4,497,623.28     6,397,721.38             -
-------------                                               ------------------
A2                                                              49,650,455.00
               1,799,828.99                -             -
-------------                                               ------------------

A3             1,245,041.91     3,873,642.66             -      31,841,695.34
-------------                                               ------------------

A4               299,316.24                -             -       8,257,000.00
-------------                                               ------------------

A5                81,005.64                -             -       2,234,638.00
-------------                                               ------------------

A6                36,250.02                -             -       1,000,000.00
-------------                                               ------------------

A7                36,250.02                -             -       1,000,000.00
-------------                                               ------------------

B1               377,587.63        41,499.81             -      10,391,800.19
-------------                                               ------------------

B2               159,922.75        17,576.75             -       4,401,323.25
-------------                                               ------------------

B3                93,284.97        10,252.74             -       2,567,347.26
-------------                                               ------------------

B4                53,305.17         5,858.65             -       1,467,041.35
-------------                                               ------------------

B5                35,539.20         3,906.05             -         978,093.95
-------------                                               ------------------

B6                44,426.09         4,882.75             -       1,222,675.25
-------------                                               ------------------

P                         -         2,661.48             -         283,007.14
-------------                                               ------------------

R                      0.66           100.00             -                  -
-------------                                               ------------------

X1               663,198.95                -             -                  -
-------------                                               ------------------

X2               547,021.46                -             -                  -
-------------                                               ------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          56,800
<SECURITIES>                                   373,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                  478,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (11,700)
<INVENTORY>                                    351,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,390,000
<PP&E>                                       1,712,500
<DEPRECIATION>                               (833,400)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,804,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          523,100
<BONDS>                                        224,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       140,100
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,594,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,804,900
<SALES>                                      2,340,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,388,200
<CGS>                                        1,580,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,017,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                333,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                   120,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            213,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                 129,400
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   343,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.38
        

</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00667

- CV
In the Estate of Mildred Ozella Favor Pursley a.k.a. Mildred F. Pursley, deceased

On a ppeal from the Probate Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. P

- 34,801

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF A PPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decisi on certified below for observance. November 24, 2015.
First Amendment to Employment Agreement






FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPOYMENT AGREEMENT


WHEREAS, the Amended and Restated Employment  Agreement (the “Agreement’) between Alan P. Moret, (the “Executive”)  and Paramount Petroleum Corporation ( “Paramount”) became effective on July 8, 2011 (the “Effective Date”); 
WHEREAS, effective May 7, 2015, the rights and obligations of Paramount were assigned to Alon USA GP, LLC (the “Company”);
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:
1. Terms not defined in this First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (this “First Amendment”) have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.
2.    Section 8(c)(ii)(D) of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:
(D)   a transfer of the Executive’s primary workplace by more than thirty-five (35) miles from the Executive’s workplace immediately prior to such transfer, if this transfer increases the commuting distance for the Executive; or
3.   A new Section 8(c)(ii)(E) is hereby added to the Agreement as follows:
(E)  the involuntary removal of Paul Eisman, in his capacity as President and Chief Executive Officer of Alon USA Energy, Inc. (“Alon”), or the removal or resignation of David Wiessman, in his capacity as Chairman of the Board of Alon.
4.  The last paragraph of Section 8(c)(ii) of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:     
Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of the events described in clauses (A), (B), (C), (D), or (E) of this section 8(c)(ii) shall constitute Good Reason unless Executive shall have notified the Company in writing describing the events which constitute Good Reason and then only if the Company shall have failed to cure such event within thirty (30) days after the Company’s receipt of such written notice.  However, any termination of the Executive’s employment by the Company after delivery by the Executive to the Company of such notice shall be deemed to be a termination without Cause if Good Reason did exist at the time such notice was given by the Executive.









5.     Except as specifically modified herein, the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect, unaffected by the execution and delivery of this First Amendment.


ALON USA GP, LLC


/s/ Paul Eisman                                              
Paul Eisman
President




Alan P Moret


/s/ Alan P Moret                                              
4712 Stonehearth Place
Dallas, TX  75287
#### William DeLong v. Emory R. Briggs.

*Affidavit for warrant of oi'rest.*

The constitutional prohibition against the issue of any warrant for arrest “without probable cause supported by oath or affirmation” makes it needful to set forth in the affidavit for the warrant the facts which support the belief that probable cause exists.

A justice’s warrant for arrest for trespass cannot issue on an affidavit which sets forth merely that affiant “has, as he has *good*reason to believe, a just cause of action against [defendant, etc.] against whom he applies for process by warrant for trespass committed by said [defendant] upon lands owned by this deponent, said lands being,”' &c.

Error to Yan Burén.

Submitted Jan. 20.

Decided Jan. 25.

Trespass. Defendant brings error.

Reversed.

*Alfred J. Mills*and *O. N. Hilton*for plaintiff in error.

*625*Amiable <& Fitch*for defendant in error.

Campbell, J.

Briggs sued DeLong in trespass before a justice of tbe peace and procured Ms arrest upon warrant issued under an affidavit wMcb, so far as is material, was of this tenor: “ That he has, as he has good reason to believe, a just cause of action against William DeLong, of the township of Paw Paw, in said county, against whom he applies for process by warrant for trespass committed by said William DeLong, upon lands owned by this deponent, said lands being,” etc.

On being brought before the justice DeLong appeared specially and moved to quash the proceedings for the lack of any legally sufficient showing to authorize the writ. The motion being denied he refused to plead, and judgment being rendered against Mm he took the case by *ceriñora/ri*to the circuit court where the judgment was affirmed.

The Constitution of this State declares that no warrant shall issue to arrest any person “without probable cause supported by oath or affirmation.” This requires facts to be set out, and mere belief without some showing as to its foundation is insufficient. *Proctor v. Prout*17 Mich. 473; *Brown v. Kelley*20 Mich. 27.

We cannot construe the Justices’ Act as intended to dispense with any requirement of the Constitution, which must always be complied with; and without such compliance an arrest is not to be resorted to.

In the present case the affidavit does not even follow the literal requirement of the statute, and does not state even a belief that DeLong has “committed á trespass.” Nothing is positively sworn to but a belief that plaintiff below had “ a just cause of action against DeLong,” without giving its foundation at all. But the other deficiency being so much more serious, we need not dwell on tMs.

The judgment of the circuit and justice’s courts must be reversed with costs of all the courts.

The other Justices concurred.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

 

ERNEST BRAGGS : 

Plaintiff, : 

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 10-00058-WS-C 

KEITH REALTY MIDTOWN/ : 

CORPORATE OVERSEER, et al., 

 : 

Defendants. 

 ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the 

issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation 

to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made 

under 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED 

that Plaintiff=s claims against Defendants Keith Realty Midtown/Corporate Overseer, Robert 

Keith, Nofio Pecoraro, Susan Milling, and Dauphin Realty, Inc., be and are hereby DISMISSED 

without prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for 

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 

DONE this 26th day of July, 2010. 

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:10-cv-00058-WS-C Document 14 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.4


 


From: Fairchild, Dwight F

Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 3:58 PM

To: Eric Skolnik; Giangrossi, John R; Hirniak, Roman B

Subject: FW: Temporary over advance approval

Importance: High


 


Mr. Skolnik, thank
you for meeting with us on March 30, 2015. Based on the information that you provided to us at that meeting, Santander agrees
to provide Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”) with $500,000 of additional availability under the Revolver
during the period from April 1, 2015 through April 24, 2015. The Company will pay Santander an accommodation fee for this additional
availability of $2,500.  Please provide to us prior to April 24, 2015, updated financial information for 2015, which takes
into account both the previously implemented phase one and the planned phase two cost reduction programs that were discussed at
our meeting.  We will review the updated financial information that you provide to us and if deemed satisfactory to Santander,
we will increase the additional liquidity available to the Company under the Revolver by an additional $500,000 for a more extended
period of time, determined based upon our analysis of the financial information that you provide to us.  If we determine
not to extend a further accommodation to you beyond the initial $500,000, we will expect that on or before September 30, 2015
you will have eliminated the over advance and will be back in formula under the Revolver.  All other terms and conditions
of your existing loan agreement with Santander will remain as they presently exist.  If you have any questions, please feel
free to call me.   


 













 


Dwight F Fairchild


Senior Vice President


Team Leader


C & I Workout Division
<PAGE>

================================================================================

                                                                      Exhibit 32

             CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. . " 1350

      Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. "1350, I, the
undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Pierre Foods, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 6, 2004 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/S/ NORBERT E. WOODHAMS
-----------------------
Norbert E. Woodhams
May 17, 2004

      Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. "1350, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Pierre Foods, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the Company for the year ended March 6, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/S/ PAMELA M. WITTERS
---------------------
Pamela M. Witters
May 17, 2004
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion sh o uld not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________ No. 98-20219

____________
ROGER K. PARSONS, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Esther Ann Parsons, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-92-CV-788) December 9, 1998 Before JOLLY, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *


### AFFIRMED. See 5 TH 

### C IR 

### . R. 47.6.
NAME Confidential 1 23-04-2021

Technical communication with users

Mikkel Haggren Brynildsen, Chief Data Scientist

Anna Nielsen, Data Scientist
Pump

OUR WORLD
LANGUAGE PROCESSING IN GRUNDFOS

• Self service chatbots (internal/external)

• Virtual assistants

• Touchless document handling

• Knowledge extraction from historic 

documents

• Technical audits of systems 

• Analysis of voice recordings

A FEW EXAMPLES
Supported maintenance, BioBooster aR chatbot
BioBooster / Dosing Pump. 

Talking to the manual:
STEP 6B:

API

ACCESS

!

STEP 6C:

...

AZURE

GRUNDFOS DIGITAL TWIN IN 15 MINUTES

(PRE-STEP:

INSTALL)

STEP 3:

EARLY

INSIGHTS

STEP 4:

AI CHAT

BOT

STEP 1a:

CONNECT

STEP 2:

COLLECT

INPUT

STEP 6A:

HUMAN

SUPPORT

STEP 5:

AI ENABLED

SUPPORT

Connect, monitor, and control your 

Grundfos system within 15 minutes

Connect and Early Insights

Access and Monitor System using Chat Bot

Get AI Guided Support when Problems Arise

External

Sensor

DevOps

CI/CD 

Pipelines

Git

Repositories

Storage (IoT telemetry)

Hot Cold

Digital Twin

Hydraulic 

Modelling

Instance Data

- Application

- Service records

3D models

Images

Schematics

Data 

Connectivity

Module

Bot Framework

Chatbot agent Chat channel

Chat channel Chat channel

NLP Services (LUIS)

Intents Example 

Utterences

Entities Utterence 

Historian

Knowledge Base

Action Flow

Ontology

Alarm

Deciphering

Dialogue 

Flows

RDF to

Bot Framework

expert system

Customer Relations Management

(CRM System)

User info

(GDPR safe)

Cloud Platform

E-Pump

Pump Controller

Module

Built-in

Sensor

Connectivity

Phone / Tablet Module

chat software
TLP Corpus
Audacity
Identify

CRM

Gather info

IOT

PRODUCT

KNOWLEDGE

Understand

Goals

Full Picture?

Reason,

Predict

Help

AI IN

SERVICE

Feedback,

iterate

Ask Questions

Augmented Intelligence

in service visits

Thank 

you

Contact: mbrynildsen (at) grundfos.com
EXHIBIT 23
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Nos. 333-35887, 333-42182, 333-43081,333-65327, 333-65329, 333-98811, 333-111076 and 333-111077 onForm S-8 of our reports dated May 13,2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Mylan LaboratoriesInc. and to management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mylan Laboratories Inc. for the year ended March31, 2005.   /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania  May 18, 2005
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the report of Activeworlds Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sean
Deson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




                                    /s/ Sean Deson
                                    ---------------------------
                                    Sean Deson
                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    Date:  March 31, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


G:\Activeworlds\SEC Documents\10-KSB\Form 10-KSB 4-03-06 blacklined.doc
1 The Honorable Charles B. Kornmann, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-3294

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Brian Bear Heels, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 20, 2006 Filed: October 31, 2006

___________ Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Brian Bear Heels appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to second degree murder, inviolation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153, 1111, and 2. His counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Bear Heels objects to counsel’s request to withdraw. Bear Heels’s plea agreement contai ns a valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (e n banc) (discussing enforceability of-2- appeal waiver); see also United States v. Estrada-Bahena , 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enf orcing appeal waiver in Anders case). Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), for any nonfrivolous issues not covered by the appealwaiver, we find none. Accordingly, we enforce the waiver, and dismi ss the appeal. We also grant counsel leave to withdraw.

______________________________
Exhibit 21.01

|SUBSIDIARIES OF KANA SOFTWARE,
INC.              
|-------------------------------------------------
|BALISOFT LTD. (ISRAEL)                           
|BROADBASE SOFTWARE, INC. (US)                    
|BROADBASE SOFTWARE GmbH (GERMANY)                
|E-SERV SOLUTIONS, INC. (us)                      
|FOUNDATION CV (NETHERLANDS, RESIDENT IN
BARBADOS)
|INTERNET BUSINESS ADVANTAGES, INC. (US)          
|INTERNET SECURITY ADVANTAGES, INC. (US)          
|KANA COMMUNICATIONS EUROPE LTD (UK)              
|KANA COMMUNICATIONS PTY LTD.
(AUSTRALIA)         
|KANA SOFTWARE AB (SWEDEN)                        
|KANA SOFTWARE AUSTRIA GmbH (AUSTRIA)             
|KANA SOFTWARE B.V. (NETHERLANDS)                 
|KANA SOFTWARE BVBA (BELGIUM)                     
|KANA SOFTWARE CANADA LTD. (CANADA)               
|KANA SOFTWARE FRANCE S.A.R.L. (FRANCE)           
|KANA SOFTWARE GmbH (GERMANY)                     
|KANA SOFTWARE HONG KONG LIMITED (HONG
KONG)      
|KANA SOFTWARE INDIA (INDIA)                      
|KANA SOFTWARE INTERNATIONAL LTD. (CAYMAN
ISLANDS)
|KANA SOFTWARE KK (JAPAN)                         
|KANA SOFTWARE KOREA LTD. (KOREA)                 
|KANA SOFTWARE LTD. (UK)                          
|KANA SOFTWARE PTE LTD. (SINGAPORE)               
|KANA SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. (US)              
|SERVICESOFT (ROSH) LTD. (ISRAEL)