alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
! " #$%&' !
!
(! )*"*" 


#(+,-,,-+,	+$,$#	,

.


//////////"//////////

#

"0
















$"
(1

#(1


*2 0
1


!
 "0

2 0
1

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

#30 .


 .

.
4 
 !"" .
  
#$

%&'
 .

003"0
03"
)"
 
*
"


.."

" )"
5 
*6)

*7

0


)6.
#

"

$00""3 " #$

%88 9."

" .09: .
3*6"
0
"
.#;%4


.
"

""
.#$%&''&9.

<
..
6
33*)*
9

IT IS ORDERED..
0"1

-(+- ;	(,-.


="3
 "*603"
"


03"0
(as reflected in 

the last judgment issued)  0."is reduced to 

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

-<
3".
7"
3
9**3"".
> 0

 ".**
0



IT IS SO ORDERED



1

Judge’s signature

-


1

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

 Southern District of Alabama

LUZ MARIA BURTON 10-00179-002

11712-003

06-07-2011

Dom Soto

✔

✔

210 168 months

06-07-2011

04-13-2015

11-01-2015 United States District Judge

13-2015

Callie V.S. Granade 

U.S. District Judge

Digitally signed by Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge 

DN: cn=Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge, o=U.S. 

Government, ou=Federal Judiciary, 

email=efile_granade@alsd.uscourts.gov, c=US 

Date: 2015.04.10 12:28:54 -06'00'

Case 1:10-cr-00179-CG-N Document 168 Filed 04/13/15 Page 1 of 1
#### Stanley JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James NEILSON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 99-56727.

D.C. No. CV-99-07349-MRP.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2001.*

Decided May 29, 2001.

Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, we deny Johnson's requests to appear and argue the merits of the appeal.

MEMORANDUM **

Stanley Johnson, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his complaint without prejudice pursuant to *Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 483-86, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *see Barnett v. Centoni,*31 F.3d 813, 816 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam), and affirm.

In his complaint, Johnson alleged that defendants engaged in a conspiracy to deny him parole by utilizing regulations which were not in effect when he was sentenced. Insofar as Johnson was seeking monetary damages or declaratory relief, his claims were properly dismissed without prejudice. *See Heck,*512 U.S. at 483-84; *Butterfield v. Bail,*120 F.3d 1023, 1024-25 (9th Cir.1997). Insofar as he was seeking injunctive relief, his claims were properly dismissed. *See Preiser v. Rodriguez,*411 U.S. 475, 500, 93 S.Ct. 1827, 36 L.Ed.2d 439 (1973). Because the defects in Johnson’s complaint could not be cured by amendment, the district court did not err by dismissing his action without leave *550to amend. *See Lopez v. Smith,*203 F.3d 1122, 1130 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
__________

United States Department of Com

National Institute of Standards and Technolo

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For: 

Tennessee 

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international 

system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, andhas demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate. The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope 

Mass Echelon II Mass Echelon III Volume, Gravimetric 

1 kg to 1 mg 25 kg to 1 mg 5 gal 

1000 lb to 0.001 lb 8 oz to 0.03125 oz Volume Transfer, II 

1000 gal to 100 gal 5 gal 

Katrice LippNIST Office 

Effective Dat

(Rev.: September 2021)
#### E. E. Spencer *v.*Carrie Spencer, et al.

Will — Construction.

Where a will bequeaths a life estate in real estate to three persona and after probate two of such devisees die, the third is entitled to a life estate in all of the land and the owner of the fee cannot take the possession until after the death of the life tenant.

APPEAL FROM LOGAN CIRCUIT COURT.

February 25, 1876.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

This controversy arises out of the second clause of the will of J. W. Spencer, which is in the following language:

> “That the remainder of the land reverting to me at my mother’s death, including the dwelling house and all other buildings upon the land, I will to my brother and sisters, E. E. Spencer, Mary Jane Tisdell, and Martha Simmons, to be held and used by them *619during their lives, and at their death to revert to my nephew, Wesley E. Simmons; but in case of his death before reaching his majority it shall revert to my father’s family or heirs.”

*James H.*Bowden, *for appellant. A. G. Rhea, for appellees.*

The testator had in the first clause of his will devised to his wife one-third of said tract of land absolutely, and this suit was originally brought by his widow against the other devisees for partition.

Before the institution of the suit Mrs: Martha Simmons had died, and during its pendency Mrs. Mary Jane Tisdell died. One-third of the land was partitioned, and set apart to Mrs. Carrie Spencer, the widow of testator, which is satisfactory to all parties. But E. E. Spencer being the survivor of the three life tenants under the will, claims the whole of the remaining thirds of the tract during his life, and W. E. Simmons, the devisee in remainder, claims that upon the death of Mrs. Tisdell and Mrs. Simmons he had a right to the immediate possession of the two-thirds to which they were entitled under the will. The court below having adjudged' to him said two interests, E. E. Spencer prosecutes this appeal.

*We*cannot concur in the conclusion of the circuit judge. According to the language of the will the land given to his brother and sisters was to be held and used by them during, their lives, and was to revert to his nephew at their death, or at the death of his brothers and sisters; for the pronoun “their” evidently refers to them, the brother and sisters, and includes all of them. Moreover, the testator gives the land to them “to be held and used by them during their liveshe makes no provision for a surrender of part of the land on the death of one or two of the life tenants. The devise is to them as a class of the whole interest, and as long as any one of the class survives that survivor must hold and enjoy the estate.

Wherefore so much of the judgment as deprives E. E. Spencer of any part of the remainder of the land after setting apart to Mrs. Carrie Spencer her portion thereof during his life is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

W. E. Simmons must pay the costs of this appeal.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74767-74768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29410]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993; National Shipbuilding Research Program

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 5, 2014, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), National Shipbuilding 
Research Program (``NSRP'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Huntington Ingalls Incorporated's, 
Avondale, LA, shipyard has withdrawn as a party to this venture.
    In addition, the nature and objective of the venture has been 
revised to establish collaborative research efforts of limited duration 
to manage and focus national shipbuilding and ship repair research and 
development funding on technologies and processes that will reduce the 
total ownership cost of ships for the U.S. Navy, other national 
security customers and the commercial sectors and develop and leverage 
best commercial and naval practices to improve efficiency of the U.S. 
shipbuilding and ship repair industry. The venture also provides a 
collaborative framework to improve shipbuilding-related technical and 
business processes.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and NSRP intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On March 13, 1998, NSRP filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on January 
29, 1999 (64 FR 4708).

[[Page 74768]]

    The last notification was filed with the Department on December 20, 
2011. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on January 20, 2012 (77 FR 3007).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-29410 Filed 12-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DANIEL R. WILLARD, TAMMY D. )

WILLARD, ROBERT L. WILLARD, JR., )

and CELENA D. SOMERSET, )

)

Plaintiffs )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO 09-0406-KD-N

)

BALDWIN COUNTY BOARD OF )

EDUCATION, )

)

Defendant. )

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, 

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the motion to dismiss filed by defendant Baldwin County

Board of Education is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED.

DONE this 31st day of December, 2009. 

s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:09-cv-00406-KD-N Document 35 Filed 01/04/10 Page 1 of 1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1520 

To amend the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 to reauthorize 

the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2023 

Mr. STANTON (for himself, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. VEASEY, and Mr. VAN

DREW) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Independence and Security Act of 

2007 to reauthorize the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION 

4 BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM. 

5 (a) PURPOSE.—Section 542(b)(1) of the Energy 

6 Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 

7 17152(b)(1)) is amended— 

8 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

9 and inserting a semicolon; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1520 IH

1 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the semi2 colon and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(C) diversifies energy supplies, including 

5 by facilitating and promoting the use of alter6 native fuels;’’. 

7 (b) USE OF FUNDS.—Section 544(9) of the Energy 

8 Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 

9 17154(9)) is amended to read as follows: 

10 ‘‘(9) deployment of energy distribution tech11 nologies that significantly increase energy efficiency 

12 or expand access to alternative fuels, including— 

13 ‘‘(A) distributed resources; 

14 ‘‘(B) district heating and cooling systems; 

15 and 

16 ‘‘(C) infrastructure for delivering alter17 native fuels;’’. 

18 (c) COMPETITIVE GRANTS.—Section 546(c)(2) of the 

19 Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 

20 U.S.C. 17156(c)(2)) is amended by inserting ‘‘, including 

21 projects to expand the use of alternative fuels’’ before the 

22 period at the end. 

23 (d) FUNDING.—Section 548(a) of the Energy Inde24 pendence and Security Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 17158(a)) 

25 is amended to read as follows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1520 IH

1 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

2 ‘‘(1) GRANTS.—There is authorized to be ap3 propriated to the Secretary to carry out the program 

4 $3,500,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 

5 through 2028. 

6 ‘‘(2) ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.—The Secretary 

7 may use for administrative expenses of the program 

8 not more than 1 percent of the amounts made avail9 able under paragraph (1) in each of fiscal years 

10 2024 through 2028.’’. 

11 (e) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—Section 543 of the 

12 Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 

13 U.S.C. 17153) is amended— 

14 (1) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘subsection 

15 (a)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)(3)’’; and 

16 (2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘subsection 

17 (a)(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)(4)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.1

 



 

Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC

A subsidiary of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.

 

May 21, 2015

 

Mr. Joseph A. Mills

 

Dear Joe:

 

This agreement is entered into by and between you and Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC (“G&P”) and sets forth certain amendments to the Confidentiality and Noncompete Agreement entered into between you and G&P dated as of August 3, 2012 (the “Confidentiality and Noncompete Agreement”).

 

This agreement, and the amendments set forth herein, shall be effective upon the closing (the “Closing”) of that certain contemplated Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) by and among Vanguard Natural Resources, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Parent”), Talon Merger Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Parent, Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and Eagle Rock GP, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership.  For the avoidance of doubt, if the Closing does not occur, this letter agreement will be of no force or effect.

 

By signing below, you and G&P acknowledge and agree that, effective as of the Closing, the Confidentiality and Non-Competition Agreement is hereby amended in the following manner:

 

1.                                      The term “Company,” as used in the Confidentiality and Noncompete Agreement is amended so that it means: “the Partnership, G&P, GP and its and their direct and indirect subsidiaries as exist as of May 21, 2015.”

 

2.                                      Section 4(f) of the Confidentiality and Noncompete Agreement is amended in order to delete the parenthetical “(or person who within the preceding 90 days was an employee)” so that, as amended, Section 4(f) of the Confidentiality and Noncompete Agreement reads, in its entirety:

 

“(f)                       Employee will not, during the eighteen month period following the Termination Date, solicit, entice, persuade or induce, directly or indirectly, any employee of the Company or any other person who is under contract with or rendering services to the Company, to (i) terminate his or her employment by, or contractual relationship with, the Company, (ii) refrain from extending or renewing the same (upon the same or new terms), (iii) refrain from rendering services to or for the Company, (iv) become

 











 

employed by or enter into contractual relations with any Persons other than the Company, or (v) enter into a relationship with a competitor of the Company.”

 

By signing below, you and G&P acknowledge and agree that the Confidentiality and Noncompete Agreement, as now exists and as may be amended by this agreement, remains in full force and effect and is enforceable in all respects.

 

	
 
    	
On   behalf of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/   Lynda C. Irvine 5/21/2015
    
	
 
    	
Lynda   C. Irvine
    
	
 
    	
Vice   President of Human Resources
    


 

 

	
ACKNOWLEDGED   AND AGREED:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   Joseph A. Mills
    	
 
    
	
Joseph   A. Mills
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
May   21, 2015
    	
 
    
	
Date
Federal Building and Fire Safety Inves

of the World Trade Center Disast

Post-Impact Frequency Ana

September 14, 2005

Kathryn Butler

Building and Fire Research Labo

National Institute of Standards and Tec

U.S. Department of Commerce

kathryn.butler@nist.gov
Video shot from east of WTC 

Video shot from east of WTC 
Video Closeup Closeup of WTC 

of WTC 
Moiré Pattern Pattern

+ =

Window Lines Pixel Columns M
Moiré Pattern Equation Pattern Equation

ParaDisplaWindoLeft aAngle 
Displacement at 70 Displacement at 70th floor of 

floor of 
Results Results

Mode of vibration Struc

Mo

Fundamental N-S mode with P-Delta Effects 11.First torsional mode 5.2 Second translational mode 3.8 Second torsional mode 2.4 

Initial sway in N-S direction Amp

70th floor 12 in. Roof level 22 in. 
Contributors Contributors

• NIST

Dr. William Pitts led the collection of vis

under Project 5 and identified the potentivideotape to study building vibrations

Dr. James Filliben performed the spectr

extract vibrational modes from the raw da
Exhiit 10(D)



 






EXHIBIT 10(D)




Form of 

The Progressive Corporation

Executive Deferred Compensation Plan 

Revocation Election

For

Gainsharing Plan Participants



This Revocation Election is entered into pursuant to the provisions of The Progressive Corporation
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (“Plan”). All capitalized terms in this Revocation Election
shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.




          WHEREAS, the undersigned Eligible Executive has previously elected to defer receipt of all or
a portion of his 2005 Gainsharing Award or has previously elected to defer receipt of his
Restricted Stock Award granted in March, 2005; and




          WHEREAS, such Eligible Executive now desires to revoke one or more of such elections;




          NOW, THEREFORE, such Eligible Executive hereby elects to revoke one or more of such elections
as follows: (Please check one or more of the boxes below, as desired)





	 	 	 	o I hereby revoke my deferral election relating to my 2005 Gainsharing Award.
	 
	 	 	 	o I hereby revoke my election to defer the time-based Restricted Stock Award
granted to me in March, 2005.
	 
	 	 	 	o I hereby revoke my election to defer the performance-based Restricted Stock
Award granted to me in March, 2005.





          I understand that this Revocation Election is subject to the terms, conditions and
limitations of the Plan, as in effect from time to time, in all respects, and, once received by the
Committee, may not be changed or revoked. I also understand that this Revocation Election will not
become effective unless received by the Committee on or before December 30, 2005.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Name of Eligible Executive:	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Signature of Eligible Executive:	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Date:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          UNDER 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         With reference to the quarterly Report of Redwood Empire Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I,
Kim C. McClaran, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United
States Code that, to my knowledge,

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                      /s/ Kim C. McClaran
                                      -----------------------
                                      Kim C. McClaran
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


                                      Date:  May 7, 2004
United States Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

Wisconsin

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, and has demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope

(Rev.: September 2021)

Mass Echelon II

5kg to 1 mg

10 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Mass Echelon III

500 kg to 1 mg

3000 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Weight Carts

6000 lb to 3000 lb

Volume Transfer, II

1000 gal to 5 gal

Volume Transfer, II LPG

750 gal to 25 gal

Stopwatches

8 h to 1 min

2022 to 2023

____________________________________

Katrice Lippa, Chief

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

Effective Dates: 2022-02-01 to 2024-02-01
Exhibit 11



DAKA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

QUARTERS AND SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 30, 1995 AND DECEMBER 31,
1994



	Quarters ended 		Nine Months ended 	

	December 30, 1995 	December 31, 1994 	December 30, 1995
	December 31, 1994 

Primary: 	 	 	 	 

Net income 	$   3,907    	$   2,764    	$   6,051    	$   4,346 
  

Net income available to common stockholders 	     3,907    	    
2,364    	     6,051    	     3,946    

	 	 	 	 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding 	7,042   
	3,817    	6,284    	3,798    

Additional shares assuming conversion of stock options 	       
370    	        227    	        348    	        222    

Average common shares outstanding and equivalents 	     7,412   
	     4,044    	     6,632    	     4,020    

	 	 	 	 

Primary earnings per share: 	 	 	 	 

Net income 	$     0.53    	$     0.58    	$     0.91    	$    
0.98    

	 	 	 	 

Fully Diluted: 	 	 	 	 

Net income available to common stockholders 	3,907    	2,364   
	6,051    	3,946    

Dividend on Preferred Stock 	 	400    	 	400    

Interest expense on Convertible Notes, after tax effect 	       
143    	        317    	        359    	        637    

	$   4,050    	$   3,081    	$   6,410    	$   4,983    

	 	 	 	 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding 	7,042   
	3,817    	6,284    	3,798    

Weighted average number of shares related to notes converted,
prior to conversion 	 177    	 272    	 316    	 286    

Weighted average number of shares related to Preferred Stock,
prior to conversion 	 	 	 599    	 

Additional shares issuable upon conversion of Preferred Stock
	265    	2,222    	265    	2,222    

Additional shares issuable upon conversion of Notes 	1,004   
	2,094    	1,004    	2,094    

Additional shares issuable upon conversion of stock options 	   
    370    	        228    	        348    	        227    

	     8,858    	     8,633    	     8,816    	     8,627    

	 	 	 	 

Fully diluted earnings per share: 	 	 	 	 

Net income 	$     0.46    	$     0.36    	$     0.73    	$    
0.58