alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-22-1997
<CASH>                                             652
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,020
<INVENTORY>                                     44,476
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,806
<PP&E>                                         203,533
<DEPRECIATION>                                  94,724
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 193,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,959
<BONDS>                                        206,288
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   193,857
<SALES>                                        161,668
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               161,668
<CGS>                                          122,851
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,851
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,954
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,321)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,321)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,321)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT**
 **TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
connection with the 1 st Quarter
Report of **Bio-Lok
International Inc.** (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
and the undersigned officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officer’s knowledge:
 
 a)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, andb)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant as of the dates and the periods expressed in the
      Report.
 
 
 **Bio-Lok
International Inc.**
 
 /s/
Ingo K Kozak
 Ingo K.
Kozak
 Chief
Financial Officer
 March 15,
2005
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARL WEST,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JOE

GORDWIN, an FBI agent,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-16909

D.C. No. 2:13-cv-00304-GMS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 6, 2016

San Francisco, California

Before: KOZINSKI, O’SCANNLAIN and MCKEOWN,** Circuit Judges.

At the time West filed his complaint, he had not yet presented his FTCA

claims to the appropriate government agency. See 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a). The

FILED

APR 3 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 ** Following argument in this case, Judge McKeown was drawn to replace

Judge Noonan.
page 2

district court thus found that it lacked jurisdiction over these claims. Concluding

that exhaustion of Counts 4, 7 and 10 would be futile because the two-year FTCA

filing deadline had passed, see 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b), the district court dismissed

those claims with prejudice. But, while West’s appeal was pending, the Supreme

Court confirmed that plaintiffs may seek equitable tolling of claims against the

United States under the FTCA. United States v. Wong, 135 S. Ct. 1625, 1638

(2015). At oral argument before us, West’s counsel represented that West has now

presented his claims to the appropriate agency. 

The district court also found that Counts 7, 9 and 10 failed to state a claim

and thus dismissed Count 9 with prejudice as well. Because West had not yet

exhausted administrative remedies, the district court did not have jurisdiction to

resolve those claims on the merits. See Munns v. Kerry, 782 F.3d 402, 413 (9th

Cir. 2015). We therefore reverse the dismissal with prejudice of Counts 4, 7, 9 and

10 so that West may refile and seek equitable tolling of those claims. We address

the rest of West’s claims in a concurrently filed opinion. 

REVERSED.
Description of Compensatory Arrangements



 EXHIBIT 10.11 
  
 DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS 
 BETWEEN REGISTRANT AND NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 
  
 Members of the Board of Directors who are not employees of Concur receive compensation for their services as directors as provided below. 
  
 Each outside director who joined the Board prior to June 2003 was granted an option for 50,000 shares under the 1998
Directors Stock Option Plan on the date he first became a member of the Board of Directors and, if he has served as a director continuously since the date of his original option grant, he is granted an option for 20,000 shares under the 1998
Directors Stock Option Plan on the date of each annual meeting of stockholders. 
  
 Each outside director who joined the Board after June 2003 may select one of the following two options. Under the first option, the outside director receives a cash stipend of approximately $35,000 per year, is
granted an option for 40,000 shares under the 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan on the date he first becomes a member of the Board of Directors, and, if he has served as a director continuously since the date of his original option grant, he is
granted an option for 10,000 shares under the 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan on the date of each annual meeting of stockholders. Under the second option, the outside director is granted an option for 60,000 shares under the 1998 Directors Stock
Option Plan on the date he first becomes a member of the Board of Directors and, if he has served as a director continuously since the date of his original option grant, he is granted an option for 20,000 shares under the 1998 Directors Stock Option
Plan on the date of each annual meeting of stockholders. 
  
 All
directors are reimbursed for their reasonable travel expenses in attending Board and committee meetings.
---



Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Cash Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. Douglas Orr, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 6, 2009



/s/ R. Douglas OrrR. Douglas Orr
Chief Financial Officer
---



Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Cash Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. Douglas Orr, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 5, 2010



/s/ R. Douglas OrrR. Douglas Orr
Chief Financial Officer
The HONORABLE WILLIAM G. CAMBRIDGE, Chief Judge, Unite d 1 States District Court for the District of Nebraska.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-2105

___________ Duane Donaldson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. United States of America, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: February 18, 1997 Filed: February 28, 1997

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Duane D. Donaldsonappeals the district court's dismissal of 1 hi s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his 18 U.S.C. § 924(c ) conviction. Having reviewed t he record and the parties' briefs on appeal, we conclude that the d istrict court properly denied relief and that no further discussion is warranted. See Bousley v . Brooks , 97 F.3d 284, 287-88 (8th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, w e affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
AO 247 (Rev. 11/11) ALSD Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

United States of America

)

)

)

)

)

)

v.

Case No:

USM No:

Date of Original Judgment:

Date of Previous Amended Judgment:

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of ’ the defendant ’ the Director of the Bureau of Prisons ’ the court under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has

subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10

and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

’ DENIED. ’ GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in 

the last judgment issued) of months is reduced to .

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date:

Judge’s signature

Effective Date:

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

 Southern District of Alabama Angelo Larmone Massey

1:08-CR-00177-002 10307-003 7/20/2010 Arthur J. Madden, III, Esquire ✔

✔

June 5, 2013 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade United States District Judge

The defendant was sentenced to the statutory mandatory minimum prior to the effective date of the Fair Sentencing Act 

of 2010, and is therefor not entitled to a reduction in sentence pursuant to that act. United States v. Hippolyte, 712 F.3rd 

535 (11th Cir. 2013). 

Case 1:08-cr-00177-CG-M Document 146 Filed 06/05/13 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
These schedules contain summary financial information extracted from Motor Club
of America's Consolidated Balance Sheets for the period ending December 31, 1996
and the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the twelve months then ended
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        47,927,093
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                     634,492
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              50,307,040
<CASH>                                       3,476,948
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       5,761,496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              95,533,102
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             47,666,856
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         18,934,200
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,023,752
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,761,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                95,533,102
<PREMIUMS>                                  45,194,073
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          3,087,112
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             707,904
<OTHER-INCOME>                               1,329,551
<BENEFITS>                                  29,148,280
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                 13,678,710
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         3,928,641
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,296,897
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,033,211
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,330,108
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,330,108
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.61
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              39,823,552
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         33,659,958
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                            2,328,781
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                          13,756,475
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            14,388,960
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             47,666,856
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                      2,328,781
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

NATHANIEL HARRIS, ) 

 ) 

Petitioner, ) 

 ) 

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-00034-WS-N 

 ) 

TONY PATTERSON, ) 

 ) 

Respondent. ) 

 JUDGMENT 

In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is ORDERED, 

ADJUDGED and DECREED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED for lack of 

jurisdiction due to petitioner=s failure to seek authorization from the Eleventh Circuit 

Court of Appeals pursuant 28 U.S.C. ' 2244(b)(3)(A) to file a successive petition, and 

that a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. 

Done this 8th day of June, 2010. 

 s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:10-cv-00034-WS-N Document 13 Filed 06/08/10 Page 1 of 1
941.0591
Exhibit 23.2



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS



We hereby consent to all references to Ryder Scott Company, L.P. and/or the reports prepared by Ryder Scott Company, L.P.
entitled Estimated Future Reserves and Income Attributable to Certain Leasehold and Royalty Interests SEC Case as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and to the incorporation by
reference into Spinnaker Exploration Companys previously filed registration statement No. 333-89894 on Form S-3 and registration statement Nos. 333-105461, 333-89779, 333-36592 and 333-61888 on Form S-8.



/S/    RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.




Houston, Texas

March 11, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1581 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1581

    To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to standardize work 
   requirements for able-bodied adults enrolled in the supplemental 
                     nutrition assistance program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2023

Mr. Johnson of South Dakota (for himself, Mr. Ellzey, Mr. Edwards, Mr. 
   Davidson, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Pfluger, Mrs. 
Chavez-DeRemer, Mr. Brecheen, Mrs. Kiggans of Virginia, Mr. Ogles, Mr. 
  Feenstra, Mr. Nehls, Mr. Zinke, Mr. Alford, Mr. Miller of Ohio, Mr. 
 Fallon, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. 
Cloud, Mr. Hudson, Mr. C. Scott Franklin of Florida, and Mr. Rosendale) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                              Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to standardize work 
   requirements for able-bodied adults enrolled in the supplemental 
                     nutrition assistance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``America Works Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. AMENDING WORK REQUIREMENTS FOR ABLE-BODIED ADULTS IN THE 
              SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

    Section 6(o)(3) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 
2015(o)(3)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(3) Exception.--Paragraph (2) shall not apply to an 
        individual if the individual is--
                    ``(A) under 18 or over 65 years of age;
                    ``(B) medically certified as physically or mentally 
                unfit for employment;
                    ``(C) a parent or other member of a household with 
                responsibility for a dependent child under 7 years of 
                age;
                    ``(D) otherwise exempt under subsection (d)(2); or
                    ``(E) a pregnant woman.''.

SEC. 3. STANDARDIZING ENFORCEMENT OF WORK REQUIREMENTS IN THE 
              SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

    Section 6(o)(4)(A)(ii) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 
U.S.C. 2015(o)(4)(A)(ii)) is repealed.

SEC. 4. ADJUSTING WORK REQUIREMENT EXEMPTIONS IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL 
              NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

    Section 6(o)(6) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 
2015(o)(6)) is amended in subparagraph (G) by inserting ``that begins 
before the date of the enactment of the America Works Act of 2023'' 
after ``year'' the second place it appears.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JEFFERY WILLIAMS, )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION 09-00433-KD-C

 )

MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF )

EDUCATION, )

Defendant. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated May 3, 2010, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this

Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED this the 19th day of May 2010.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00433-KD-C Document 26 Filed 05/20/10 Page 1 of 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bay View Capital Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the
Report), I, Charles G. Cooper, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                 
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company for the periods presented therein.

Date: August 14, 2003



| | /s/ Charles G. Cooper
Charles G. Cooper
President and Chief
Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Bay View Capital Corporation and will be retained by Bay View
Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.