alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE 6 STEP GUIDE TO SUBMIT A NIST SURF APPLICATION

Vacancy closes on Jan 31, 2024 11:59 PM ET ⚑

⚑ submitted SURF applications can be edited but ONLY UNTIL the vacancy closes.

1

ELIGIBILITY: STEM undergrads (current freshmen, sophomores, juniors, seniors) enrolled in US universities. Only US citizens or US 

permanent residents.

2

REFERENCES: identify 2 professional references and confirm that they are willing to submit strong letters of recommendation. Notify 

your references through the online system. Please note that your references can only submit their letters after you click Submit and 

until the 3rd of Feb at 11:59 PM ET ⚑. Note that your application will be rejected if either recommendation letter is missing.

3

• Identify the NIST research programs that are your 1st and 2nd choices. The NCNR CHRNS SURF page lists examples of past projects 

that are typical of the “MML/NCNR Material Science” program. It is important to choose a program that best fits your interest.

• Create an account and profile on USAJobs

4

• Find the VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT for NIST SURF Program at Gaithersburg (SURF-2024-002) and follow the instructions on the ‘How to 

Apply’ Box. 

• Complete Position Eligibility and Vacancy questions. 

5

Upload the REQUIRED DOCUMENTS: (the application will be rejected if documents are absent, incorrect, or misplaced)

(1) Personal statement; (2) Resume; (3) Transcript(s) (unofficial is acceptable); (4) Proof of U.S. citizenship- copy of an unexpired U.S. Passport 

or Birth certificate (note that driver license and social security card are unacceptable) – or Permanent Resident status (Greencard); (5)

verification of Health Insurance.

6

Input contact details for 2 confirmed references. Then SUBMIT your application ASAP ⚑: make sure to give your references enough time to 

write & upload their letter. Check with your references that they received an email request to submit their letters via the online application 

system (no later than 3 days after the vacancy closes, or your application will be rejected).

✓

• Applications submitted successfully will receive a control number. If you do not receive a control number, your application has not 

been submitted. Refer to SURF Application website for full details and FAQ

• Contact surf@nist.gov to resolve any issues during the application process.
Case 1:05-cv-00380-KD-C Document 30 Filed 01/17/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:05-cv-00380-KD-C Document 30 Filed 01/17/06 Page 2 of 2
11067.

#### Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. *v.*Howard.

Decided March 11, 1920.

Action for damages; from McDuffie superior court — Judge Henry C. Hammond. October 20, 1919.

*Cumming & Harper,*for plaintiff in error,

cited 101 *Ga.*747. *John T. West,*contra, cited: 101 *Ga.*747, 748; 113 *Ga.*335; 114 *Ga.*312, 314; 128 *Ga.*438, 441; 130 *Ga.*375; 113 *Ga.*134.

Smith, J.

Though there was evidence to show that the fire which damaged the plaintiff’s property was discovered between 25 and 30 minutes after the passing of the train, from the engine of which the plaintiff insists sparks were emitted which caused the fire, there is no testimony to show that the sparks were coming from the engine at the time it passed the property, or that it caused the fire, other than the following: that the wind was blowing in the direction of the burned house from the track, that the fire in question occurred about midnight, and that there had been no fire in or near the house, which was a high two-story dwelling, since about 10 or 11 o’clock in the morning, and that the fire was first seen on the top of the roof. This was not, under the decisions made in *Seaboard Air-Line Ry.*v. *Jarrell,*145 *Ga.*688 (89 S. E. 718), and *Gainesville &c. Railroad Co.*v. *Edmondson,*101 *Ga.*747 (29 S. E. 213), enough to authorize the jury to find that the engine of the defendant caused the fire by the emission of sparks, there being uncontradicted proof to show not only that the engine which passed on the night of the fire was properly equipped with an approved spark-arrester, but that it was handled in a skilful and proper manner. '

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 In connection with the  Quarterly Report of  First Cash Financial  Services,
 Inc. (the "Company") on  Form 10-Q for the  quarterly period  ended June 30,
 2005, as  filed with  the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on  the  date
 hereof (the "Report"), we, J. Alan Barron and R. Douglas Orr  each  certify,
 pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906  of
 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.



 Date:  July 26, 2005

 /s/ J. Alan Barron
 --------------------------------------
 J. Alan Barron
 Chief Executive Officer

 /s/ R. Douglas Orr
 --------------------------------------
 R. Douglas Orr
 Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,838
<PP&E>                                          39,708
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,143
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,530
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (47,127)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,403
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,934
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,934)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,934)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,934)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.001)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1455 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1455

To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to 
 provide research and extension grants to support the study of insects 
  and pests that impact plantains and bananas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2023

    Mrs. Gonzalez-Colon (for herself and Ms. Tokuda) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to 
 provide research and extension grants to support the study of insects 
  and pests that impact plantains and bananas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Plantain and Banana Plant Health 
Initiative Act''.

SEC. 2. PLANTAIN AND BANANA PLANT HEALTH INITIATIVE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1672(d) of the Food, Agriculture, 
Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 5925(d)) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(21) Plantain and banana health initiative.--Research and 
        extension grants may be made under this section for a term of 
        not less than 5 years for the purposes of--
                    ``(A) studying potential resistance and tolerance 
                to nonnative diseases and insect pests;
                    ``(B) increasing research for treatment of pests 
                that affect plantains and bananas, including Fusarium 
                oxysporum f.sp.cubense, Tropical Race 4;
                    ``(C) conducting field studies to evaluate plantain 
                and banana cultivars with enhanced resistance to 
                diseases and pests, and adaptability to tropical soils;
                    ``(D) disseminating information and educating 
                growers on best practices to promote safe production of 
                plantains and bananas; and
                    ``(E) establishing an areawide integrated pest 
                management program in areas affected by, or areas at 
                risk of being affected by pests such as Fusarium 
                oxysporum f.sp.cubense, Tropical Race 4.''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 1672(h) of the Food, 
Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 5925(h)) is 
amended by striking ``2023'' and inserting ``2027''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 28, 2013

p1021 

# Order

Clerk October 28, 2013

146532 & (58)

THEODORE SLICER,

Plainti ff

- Appellee/

Cross

- Appellant,

v SC: 146532

COA: 298068

Clinton CC: 09

- 010506

- CK

CITY OF ST. JOHNS,

Defendant/Cross

- Plaintiff

- Appellee/Cross

- Appellee,

and

COUNTY OF CLINTON,

Defendant,

and

CLINTON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION,

Defendant/Cross

- Defendant

- Appellant/Cross

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 6, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross

appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE )

INSURANCE COMPANY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.

) 05-0404-BH-C

CHOCTAW COUNTY E-911 )

COMMUNICATION DISTRICT, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

This declaratory judgment action is before the Court on a motion (Docs. 26-28) for

summary judgment filed by the plaintiff, American Alternative Insurance Company

(“AAIC”). AAIC seeks a declaration that it owes no duty to defend or indemnify the

Choctaw County E-911 Communication District (“District”), a defendant herein, under

the Commercial General Liability Insurance Policy it issued to the District for the

September 1, 1998 through September 1, 2000 period, with respect to an underlying state

court class action lawsuit filed on March 13, 2000 (“the Turner lawsuit”). The motion is

predicated on the contention that insurance coverage is excluded because: (1) the Turner

lawsuit arises out of Choctaw County’s “willful violation” of a statute; and (2) the

damages sought from Choctaw County in the Turner lawsuit amount to an excluded

“fine” or “penalty.” 

Case 1:05-cv-00404-BH-C Document 35 Filed 08/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

It is irrelevant, in this Court’s opinion, that the funds paid by the plaintiff class in the

Turner lawsuit might have already been spent. The statute merely requires a refund of those

sums, however difficult the task might be.

2

Upon consideration of the motion, defendants’ respective responses in opposition

thereto (Docs. 31-33), AAIC’s reply (Doc. 34) and all other pertinent portions of the

record, the Court concludes and it is therefore ORDERED that AAIC’s motion for

summary judgment is due to be and is hereby DENIED. Despite AAIC’s protestations to

the contrary, the Court concludes that material issues of fact exist concerning whether the

claims asserted in the Turner lawsuit arose from a “willful violation” of Ala. Code § 11-

98-5. The Court further concludes that the “refund of collections” required under Ala.

Code § 11-98-5 and directed by the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals does not constitute a

“fine” or a “penalty” but, instead, a mere reimbursement of funds previously collected.1

DONE this 3rd day of August, 2006.

 s/ W. B. Hand 

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00404-BH-C Document 35 Filed 08/03/06 Page 2 of 2
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4907

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 

Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 

Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Wildomar Service Area Recycled 

Water Distribution Facilities and Alberhill Wastewater Treatment and 

Reclamation Facility Projects. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2004

Mr. ISSA (for himself and Mr. CALVERT) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Wildomar Service Area Recycled 

Water Distribution Facilities and Alberhill Wastewater 

Treatment and Reclamation Facility Projects.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Elsinore Valley Munic5 ipal Water District Wastewater and Recycled Water Fa6 cilities Act of 2004’’. 
2

•HR 4907 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

3 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102–

4 575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by 

5 adding after section 1636 the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 1637. ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DIS7 TRICT PROJECTS, CALIFORNIA. 

8 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera9 tion with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, 

10 California, may participate in the design, planning, and 

11 construction of permanent facilities needed to establish re12 cycled water distribution and wastewater treatment and 

13 reclamation facilities that will be used to treat wastewater 

14 and provide recycled water in the Elsinore Valley Munic15 ipal Water District, California. 

16 ‘‘(b) COST SHARING.—The Federal share of the cost 

17 of each project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 

18 25 percent of the total cost of the project. 

19 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—Funds provided by the Secretary 

20 under this section shall not be used for operation or main21 tenance of the projects described in subsection (a). 

22 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

23 is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

24 $12,500,000.’’. 
3

•HR 4907 IH 

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 in section 2 of Public Law 102–575 is amended by insert3 ing after the item relating to section 1636 the following:

‘‘Sec. 1637. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Projects, California.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4602 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4602

To authorize the subdivision and dedication of restricted land owned by 
                            Alaska Natives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2004

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                     to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the subdivision and dedication of restricted land owned by 
                            Alaska Natives.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Alaska Native Allotment Subdivision 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Restricted land.--The term ``restricted land'' means 
        land in the State that is subject to Federal restrictions 
        against alienation and taxation.
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.
            (3) State.--The term ``State'' means the State of Alaska.

SEC. 3. SUBDIVISION AND DEDICATION OF ALASKA NATIVE RESTRICTED LAND.

    (a) In General.--An Alaska Native owner of restricted land may, 
subject to the approval of the Secretary--
            (1) subdivide the restricted land in accordance with the 
        laws of the--
                    (A) State; or
                    (B) applicable local platting authority; and
            (2) execute a certificate of ownership and dedication with 
        respect to the restricted land subdivided under paragraph (1) 
        with the same effect under State law as if the restricted land 
        subdivided and dedicated were held by unrestricted fee simple 
        title.
    (b) Ratification of Prior Subdivisions and Dedications.--Any 
subdivision or dedication of restricted land executed before the date 
of enactment of this Act that has been approved by the Secretary and by 
the relevant State or local platting authority, as appropriate, shall 
be considered to be ratified and confirmed by Congress as of the date 
on which the Secretary approved the subdivision or dedication.

SEC. 4. EFFECT ON STATUS OF LAND NOT DEDICATED.

    Except in a case in which a specific interest in restricted land is 
dedicated under section 3(a)(2), nothing in this Act terminates, 
diminishes, or otherwise affects the continued existence and 
applicability of Federal restrictions against alienation and taxation 
on restricted land or interests in restricted land (including 
restricted land subdivided under section 3(a)(1)).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Ruby Tuesday, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2016 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 15, 2016, as amended, I, F. Lane Cardwell, Jr., Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

| Date: November 21, 2016 |   |   |   | /s/ F. Lane Cardwell, Jr.                     |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                         |   |   |   | F. Lane Cardwell, Jr.                         |
|                         |   |   |   | Interim President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                         |   |   |   |                                          |
|                         |   |   |   |                                          |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE   CONTAINS   SUMMARY   FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                    25,246
<SECURITIES>                                              76,095
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               7,963
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         340,662
<PP&E>                                                    14,248
<DEPRECIATION>                                            11,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           437,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    397,735
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                  24,832
<OTHER-SE>                                                14,597 <F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             437,164
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          26,226
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          12,155
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        7,710
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            5,661
<INCOME-TAX>                                               2,187
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        3,474
<DISCONTINUED>                                             (596)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              276
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                               2,602
<EPS-BASIC>                                               1.03 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               1.00 <F3>
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS ON AFS OF ($332)
<F2>FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
<F3>FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
</FN>


</TABLE>