alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          45,382
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          60,518
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                13,419
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     15,026
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         586,393
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           587,421
<LOANS>                                      4,470,847
<ALLOWANCE>                                     45,346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,946,004
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,676,347
<SHORT-TERM>                                   870,250
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             31,949
<LONG-TERM>                                    978,806
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           204
<OTHER-SE>                                     388,448
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               5,946,004
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 92,583
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               12,315
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               104,898
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              35,984
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,608
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           42,290
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    7,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 42,977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,568
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      16,568
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,034
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.21
<LOANS-NON>                                     10,408
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   935
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                44,453
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  (6,944)
<RECOVERIES>                                       837
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               45,346
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            45,346
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
NIST Center for Neutron Research

Dan Neumann, Leader, Neutron Condensed Matter Science Group, NIST Center for Neutron Research
NCNR by the NUMBERS 29 experimental beam instruments/experiments 
NIST Neutron Strategy
INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT
INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT
The United States should sharply increase its 

investments in neutron instrumentation development 

and deployment to partially compensate for the 

country’s dramatic decrease in neutron R&D capacity 

and capability in recent decades; to offset any loss 

of capability arising from the elimination of HEU 

fuel from research reactors; and to complement 

continuing investments in complementary tools such as 

light sources and high-performance computing. 

The United States should initiate an effort to 

competitively design and build a new generation of 

LEU-fueled high-performance research reactors that 

would satisfy all needs presently met by current HEUfueled U.S. high-performance research reactors and 

provide new capabilities. 

2018 Wells Report (APS-POPA)

RECOMMENDATIONS
Affiliate Members

October 2023

AFFILIATES

Claire Dragovich

Jason Bory

David Gouldthorpe

Melissa Hehir

Jaclyn Iera

Jason Nawyn

Jonia Prieto

Charlene Rittenbach

Sandra Rodriguez-Cruz

Amanda Shanbaum

Ruth Smith

Casper Venter
nSoft Consortium - Industry Impacts 

on Development of Neutron-Based 

Measurement Science

nSoft NCNR

MML
5/23/2019 2

nSoft Paradigm

• Industry needs national 

facilities to innovate 

• Facilities see industry as key 

customer

• Access models geared 

toward academics

Market Failure

• nSoft built with industrial 

relevant metrics of success

• Industrial needs = high 

merit  no proposals

• NIST designs research, new 

capability

Incubators

• Measurements co- developed for broader 

community

• Higher adoption rates, 

targeted impacts

• User community expands

Expertise Transfer

A Well Known Issue A New Approach Reaping Benefits
Expertise Transfer

NIST Role

• Connect members to NIST Community

• Guide experiments toward success

• Build, Use, Support, and Publish

• Operate 10m SANS

Collaboratively advance neutron based 

measurement science toward viable 

solutions for industrial needs

Member Role

• Participate in on-site experiments

• Provide supporting data

• $25k/year

Ronald Jones (NIST, left) and Ryan Murphy (Solvay, right) at 

the 10 meter Small Angle Neutron Scattering instrument
Healthy Growth

Growth rate accommodated by 

expansion across techniques

Expanding support from across 

the NIST campus

#1 reason for departure is 

member reorganization
High Shear in Manufacturing

• Rheo-SANS a NIST core competency

• Current magnitude of shear limited, 

mismatch to manufacturers

• Funded at >$1M/year for 5 years by NIST

• 3 publications to date

• Device will transition to user program by 

2020

New capability for the 

user program
Efficient Shale Gas Extraction

Petrochemical Society 

Award, Nature Comm.

• Need to understand gas storage in shale

• Aramco provides shale cores

• New high pressure gas cell designed, built

• SANS for pore size distribution, chemistry

• Neutron and X-ray tomography (NeXT) 

provides macroscopic map
Robust OTC Drug Delivery

• Soft gel performance varies with climate, 

loss of product and regulatory challenge

• $500 M market for Pfizer alone (Advil)

• Pfizer provides gel cap formulations

• SANS and poroelasticity measurements 

provide molecular insight into burst time

• New formulations being tested for adoption

New product formulations 

in pipeline

viscoplasticity plasticity
QUESTIONS?
! " #$%&'

#()*+**+)*	)$*$#	*

,


----------"----------

#

".
















$"
(/

#(/


01 .
/


!
 ".

1 .
/

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

#2. ,


 ,

,
3 
 !"" ,
  
#$

%&'
 ,

..2".
.2"
4"
 
0
"


,,"

" 4"
5 
064

07

.


46,
#

"

$..""2 " #$

%88 9,"

" ,.9: ,
206"
.
"
,#;%3


,
"

""
,#$%&''&9,

<
,,
6
22040
9

IT IS ORDERED,,
."/

+()+ ;	(*+,


="2
 "06.2"
"


.2".
(as reflected in 

the last judgment issued)  .,"is reduced to 

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

+<
2",
7"
2
9002"",
> .

 ",00
.



IT IS SO ORDERED



/

Judge’s signature

+


/

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

 Southern District of Alabama

CLARENCE ANTOINE MATT 13-00172-001

13348-003

12-16-13

PRO SE

✔

✔

February 3, 2015

United States District Judge

The defendant was convicted of Felon in Possession of a Firearm, and his guidelines were driven by U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1,

which is not subject to a reduction under Amendment 782.

Callie V.S. Granade 

U.S. District Judge

Digitally signed by Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge 

DN: cn=Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge, o=U.S. 

Government, ou=Federal Judiciary, 

email=efile_granade@alsd.uscourts.gov, c=US 

Date: 2015.02.03 10:31:31 -06'00'

Case 1:13-cr-00172-CG-B Document 32 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 1
NIST World Trade Center Confe

NIST World Trade Center Confe

Session 5: Analysis of Act

Session 5: Analysis of Act

Protection Systems Protection Systems

William Grosshandler, Sessio

William Grosshandler, Sessio

Building and Fire Research La

Building and Fire Research La

National Institute of Standards and 

National Institute of Standards and 
Building Fire Safety Sys

Building Fire Safety Sys

Egress systems:

stairs, elevators, doors, protected c

Passive fire protection systems:

partitions, gypsum board, sprayed fmaterial (SFRM), intumescent

mate

Active fire protection systems:

fire sensors and alarmsnotification systemssprinklers and water suppliesnon-aqueous fire suppression sysmoke management systems
Recommendations for Improv

Recommendations for Improv

Fire Protection Systems 

Fire Protection Systems 

Enhance sprinklers, standpipes/hoses, fire smoke management systems to accommo

• greater risks associated with increasi

height and/or population, 

• increased use of open spaces, • high-risk building activities, • fire department response limits, • transient fuel loads, and • higher threat profile. 
Recommendations for Improv

Recommendations for Improv

Fire Protection Systems 

Fire Protection Systems 

Develop fire alarm and communications systandards for their performance, to provide reliable, and accurate information on statuconditions at a level of detail sufficient to mbuilding evacuation process in fire emerge
Recommendations for Improv

Recommendations for Improv

Fire Protection Systems 

Fire Protection Systems 

Adapt control panels at fire/emergency comstations in buildings (with standards of peraccept and interpret larger quantity of morinformation from systems that provide tactaids to fire-ground commanders, including rates from pressure/flow measurement dev
Recommendations for Improv

Recommendations for Improv

Fire Protection Systems 

Fire Protection Systems 

Develop and implement systems for:• real-time off-site transmission of informati

monitored building systems for use by emresponders to enhance situational awarenresponse decisions; and

• preservation of information (off-site or in b

purposes of subsequent investigations an
Session V. Presentatio

Session V. Presentatio

Fire Alarm Systems -

Robert Keough, Rolf Jensen Assoc.Raymond Grill, Arup Engineering

Fire Suppression Systems -

Mark Hopkins, Hughes Assoc., Inc.

Smoke Management Systems -

Michael Ferreira, Hughes Assoc., In
Submitted Public Comm

Submitted Public Comm

Bill Allen, Leigh's PaintsJohn P. Couch, Kori Technology GroupRichard Schulte, Schulte & Assoc.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-55562) pertaining to the NBC Internet, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the NBC Internet, Inc.
1999 Stock Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-45782) pertaining to the Connect Innovations, Inc. 1998 Stock Plan and the Globalbrain.net Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-37048) pertaining to the NBC Internet, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the NBC Internet, Inc. 2000 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the
AllBusiness.com, Inc. 1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan and the AllBusiness.com, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan, and the Husdawg Communications, Inc. 2000 Stock Plan, and the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-91715) pertaining to the NBC Internet, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, of our report dated February 12, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of NBC
Internet, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.

| | /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP
| | ----------------------

Palo Alto, California

March
28, 2001

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                                 3,215
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          6,026
<ALLOWANCES>                                             728
<INVENTORY>                                            9,037
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      19,846
<PP&E>                                                 5,453
<DEPRECIATION>                                         4,335
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        22,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  5,022
<BONDS>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                  23
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                            16,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          22,520
<SALES>                                               42,445
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      42,445
<CGS>                                                 31,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         25,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       8,818
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         262
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        2,364
<INCOME-TAX>                                             398
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    1,453
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                           1,453
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .60
        


</TABLE>
AO 245D (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations (11946)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE

V. (For Revocation of Probation or Supervised Release)

JENNIFER SANDERS CASE NUMBER: 1:11-CR-00344-001

USM NUMBER: 12390-003

THE DEFENDANT: Raymond L. Bell, Jr., Esquire

Defendant's Attorney

admitted guilt to violation of supervision conditions: Statutory, 1 & 9 as set forth in the 

Petition dated 8/21/2015.

was found in violation of supervision condition: 

Violation Number Nature of Violation

Date violation

Occurred

Statutory

1

9

New Offense

Technical

Technical

08/14/2015

The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 2 of this judgment. The sentence is 

imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.

The defendant has not violated condition(s) and is discharged as to such violation(s) 

condition.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States Attorney for this 

district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, 

costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid.

January 26, 2016

Date of Imposition of Judgment

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

February 2, 2016

Date

X

Case 1:11-cr-00344-CG-C Document 55 Filed 02/02/16 Page 1 of 2
Judgment 2

AO 245D (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations: Sheet 2 - Imprisonment

Defendant: JENNIFER SANDERS

Case Number: 1:11-CR-00344-001

IMPRISONMENT

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be 

imprisoned for a total term of TWENTY-FOUR (24) MONTHS, said term is to run consecutively to 

the custody sentence imposed in 1:15-CR-00199-001.

The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons: 

The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district:

at .m. on .

as notified by the United States Marshal.

The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau 

of Prisons:

before 2 p.m. on .

as notified by the United States Marshal.

as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office.

RETURN

I have executed this judgment as follows:

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

Defendant delivered on to at __________________

with a certified copy of this judgment.

 UNITED STATES MARSHAL 

By _________________________________

 Deputy U.S. Marshal

X

Case 1:11-cr-00344-CG-C Document 55 Filed 02/02/16 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
 
                                  Exhibit 12


COMPUTATIONS OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Nine Months Ended
                                                 September 30,
                                              ------------------
                                                 1997     1996
                                              --------  --------
<S>                                           <C>       <C>
Earnings:                                
      Earnings before income tax expense      $ 21,794  $ 10,736
      Add:                               
      Interest on advances and other     
       borrowings                               57,405    43,890
      Interest component of rental       
       expense                                     815       466
                                              --------  --------
      Earnings before fixed charges      
       excluding interest on customer 
       deposits                                 80,014    55,092
      Interest on customer deposits             56,723    74,712
                                              --------  --------
      Earnings before fixed charges           $136,737  $129,804
                                              ========  ========
                                         
Fixed Charges:                           
      Interest on advances and other     
       borrowings                               57,405    43,890
      Interest component of rental       
       expense                                     815       466
                                              --------  --------
      Fixed charges excluding interest   
       on customer deposits                     58,220    44,356
      Interest on customer deposits             56,723    74,712
                                              --------  --------
      Total fixed charges                     $114,943  $119,068
                                              ========  ========
                                         
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges       
 including interest on customer deposits         1.19x     1.09x
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges       
 excluding interest on customer deposits         1.37x     1.24x
 
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME OF MONSANTO COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, AND THE STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
POSITION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995. SUCH INFORMATION IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             297
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,629<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,368
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,305
<PP&E>                                           7,237
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,405
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,812
<BONDS>                                          1,667
<COMMON>                                           329
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,611
<SALES>                                          8,962
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,962
<CGS>                                            5,109
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 190
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,087
<INCOME-TAX>                                       348
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                739
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       739
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1> Reported net of allowances of $57
        

</TABLE>
USGv6 Test Selection Tables 

Authentication Trailer OSPF for IPv6

I9-Interoperability: Routing Protocol R1v1.2

Applicable Profile: NIST SP 500-267B Revision 1 USGv6 Profile – November 2020.

Test Specification Id: 

• [OSPFv3-Interoperability] OSPFv3 Interoperability Test Plan, [editor: UNH InterOperability Laboratory]. 

Interoperability Partner Requirements:

• Any host or router claiming compliance with the USGv6 profile MUST demonstrate evidence of 

interoperability with one or more independent implementations of IPv6. Three implementations are 

recommended to be used when support for RFC 7166 is more widely adopted.

• Target nodes must not change once testing has begun.

Interoperability Partners:

• DUT = TR1 for all tests.

• TAR-Router1 = Independent Implementation Device B 

• TAR-Router2 = Independent Implementation Device C 

• TAR-Router3 = Independent Implementation Device D 

• H1 and H2 = Any devices which can execute ping6 function 

OSPF for IPv6 Test Check List

Reference Test Specification Id Test Number Device Type

RFC 5340

RFC 7166

OSPFv3-

Interoperability

OSPFv3.IO.6.1 Authentication Trailer with HMAC-SHA256 (A) Router

RFC 5340

RFC 7166

OSPFv3-

Interoperability OSPFv3.IO.6.2 Key Changes (A)(D)(G)(J) Router 

RFC 5340

RFC 7166

OSPFv3-

Interoperability OSPFv3.IO.6.3 Sequence Number Across Reboot (A) Router 

References: 

• [RFC 5340] Coltun, R., Ferguson, D., Moy, J., and A. Lindem, "OSPF for IPv6", RFC 5340, DOI 

10.17487/RFC5340, July 2008. 

• [RFC 7166] Bhatia M., Manral V., Lindem A., “Supporting Authentication Trailer for OSPFv3”, RFC 

7166, DOI 10.17487/RFC7166, March 2014.

The objective of this test selection sheet is to provide a reference for available test specifications that identifies tests 

applicable to the USGv6 Profile.