alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MEDUSA
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES' STATEMENT OF INCOME AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000064674
<NAME> MEDUSA CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          13,813
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,693
<INVENTORY>                                     33,013
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,520
<PP&E>                                         419,942
<DEPRECIATION>                                 258,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 306,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,397
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     190,675
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   306,513
<SALES>                                        375,958
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               375,958
<CGS>                                          237,720
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (311)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 83,836
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,807
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             57,029
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    57,029
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.41
        

</TABLE>
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOSE AB EL GAM EZ-PEREZ, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 15-71141 Age n c y No. A200-699-267 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

June 14, 2016 ** B e fore : B EA, WATFORD, a nd FRIEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. Jose Abe l Ga

m e z -Pe re z , a

native an d c itiz e n of M e xic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B o ard of Im

m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism i ssing his a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c ision de ny ing his a pplic ation for c anc e lla

tion of re m ova l. Our jurisdic tion is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w de novo



# FIL ED JUN 20 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).que stions of la w. Mohamme d v . Gonzale s , 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th C ir. 2005). W e dism i ss in pa

rt a nd de ny in pa rt the pe tition for re vie w . W e la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r Gam e z -Pe re z ’ s une xha uste d c onte ntions that the IJ e rre d a

nd viola te d due proc e s s by

re ly ing on his c rim i na l history in the ha rdship a na ly sis. Se e Tijani v . Holde r , 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th C ir. 2010) (we la c k jurisdic tion to re vie w le ga l c la im s not pre se nte d in a n a lie n’ s a dm inistra

tive proc e e dings be fore the B IA). Ac c ordingly , Gam e z -Pe re z ’ s c onte ntion tha t the B IA e rre d

in fa i ling to a ddre s s the se c la im s is without m e rit, whe re he fa ile d

to ra ise the m

to the B IA. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDISM ISSE D in par t; DE NIE D in par t.

1 5 - 7 1 1 4 1 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SALVADOR NAVA, AIS 260069, :

Petitioner, :

vs. : CA 10-0165-WS-C

JOHN CUMMINS, et al., :

Respondents.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the

issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated June 1, 2010 is ADOPTED

as the opinion of this Court.

DONE this 29th day of June, 2010.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00165-WS-C Document 9 Filed 06/29/10 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT JUNE 30, 1996
AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1996 OF NALCO CHEMICAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                     37,700,000
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                             234,900,000
<ALLOWANCES>                              (4,300,000)
<INVENTORY>                                94,700,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          433,600,000
<PP&E>                                  1,143,300,000
<DEPRECIATION>                          (613,300,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,459,700,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     317,400,000
<BONDS>                                   306,700,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                   400,000
<COMMON>                                   15,100,000
<OTHER-SE>                                605,300,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,459,700,000
<SALES>                                   620,500,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          620,500,000
<CGS>                                     274,600,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             274,600,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          7,000,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           101,200,000
<INCOME-TAX>                               36,700,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        64,500,000
<DISCONTINUED>                              4,300,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                               68,800,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.87


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TODD JEFFERY GATES, : 

 Petitioner, : 

 CIVIL ACTION 12-0330-KD-M

v. : 

 CRIMINAL ACTION 10-00026-KD-M 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : 

 Respondent. : 

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this 

file, and a de novo determination of those portions of the 

Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of 

the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is 

adopted as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 

102) be GRANTED, that Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate (Doc. 98) be 

DENIED, and that this action be DISMISSED. It is further 

ORDERED that, if Petitioner files a certificate of 

appealability, then it is DENIED as he is not entitled to appeal 

in forma pauperis.

DONE this 21st day of September, 2012.

s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:10-cr-00026-KD-M Document 107 Filed 09/25/12 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.1 Amendment One to 8-K






EXHIBIT 10.1


AMENDMENT ONE TO THE 
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
AMENDED AND RESTATED DIRECTOR FEE PLAN


Service Corporation International, a Texas corporation (the “Company”), hereby adopts the following Amendment to the Service Corporation International Amended and Restated Director Fee Plan (the “Plan”): 
WHEREAS, the Plan was adopted by the Company, as amended and restated, effective February 9, 2011; and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to change the terms of the Plan to permit deferral elections to be made by newly appointed directors; and
WHEREAS, Section 9 of the Plan gives the Board of Directors the authority to make amendments to the Plan; 
NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective May 12, 2015, as follows:


1.    Section 4.2 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following language to the end thereof, to be and read as follows:  


“A new Director may make an election to defer his or her annual retainer fee in accordance with procedures established by the Company, provided that such election (i) is made prior to the date the Director is appointed or elected to the Board, (ii) is effective as of the Director’s appointment or election to the Board, and (iii) only applies to that portion of the annual retainer fee earned after the signed election is delivered to the Company.”


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, duly authorized officer of the Company, has caused this instrument to be executed on this 12th day of May, 2015.


SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL






By:     /s/ Gregory T. Sangalis            
Gregory T. Sangalis
Its: Senior VP, General Counsel and     Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4539 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4539

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 214.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2004

 Mr. Langevin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 214.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PIGMENT YELLOW 214.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.34.52      Pigment Yellow 214  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 254430-                                                   31/2006
                         12-5) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         3204.17.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
11213.

#### Thompson *v.*The State.

Decided April 14, 1920.

Indictment for manufacture of liquor; from Randolph superior court — Judge Harrell presiding. November 11, 1919.

*Charles W. Worrill,*for plaintiff in error.

*B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

The special grounds of the motion for a new trial in this case are but amplifications of the general grounds; there is some evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and, under the uniform rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, this court is powerless to interfere.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

          - 5 CFR Part 532

      ( print page 74585)    

### CFR Correction

In Title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1 to 699, revised as of January 1, 2014, on page 445, in appendix C to subpart B of part 532, under Colorado, under the subheading “Southern Colorado”, under “Area of Application. Survey area plus:”, remove the entry for Montrose.

[FR Doc. 2014-29465 Filed 12-15-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 Chief Financial Officer Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Capitol Bancorp Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q (the
Form 10-Q) for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Lee W. Hendrickson, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: April 29, 2005 /s/ Lee W. HendricksonLee W. Hendrickson
Chief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Capitol Bancorp Ltd. and will be retained by Capitol Bancorp Ltd. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. E-6
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The
Board of Directors and Shareholders of Aquila, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference into the company's previously filed registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-88280 and
333-67822) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-92294, 333-68042, 333-68040, 333-68044, 333-67820,
333-66233, 033-45525, 033-50260, 033-52094, 333-19671, 333-91305, 333-94955, 333-30742,
333-29819 and 333-77703) of our reports dated March 11, 2005 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Aquila, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and
2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, common shareholders' equity, comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2004, and all related financial statement schedules, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004, Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Aquila, Inc.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Kansas
City, Missouri
March 11, 2005

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

     The undertaking set forth below is filed for purposes of incorporation by 
reference into Part II of the registration statements on Form S-8, File Nos. 
33-28808, 33-5874, 33-32934 and 33-50324.

ITEM 9.   UNDERTAKINGS.
-------   -------------

     (a)  The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:

          Insofar as indemnification for liabilities rising under the Securities
          Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") may be permitted to directors,
          officers or persons controlling the registrant pursuant to the
          provisions described in this registration statement, or otherwise,
          CoreStates Financial Corp (the "Company") has been advised that in the
          opinion of the Commission such indemnification is against public
          policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore
          unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against
          such liabilities (other than the payment by the Company of expenses
          incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the
          Company in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding)
          is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
          connection with the securities being registered, the Company will,
          unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
          controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction
          the question whether such indemnification by it is against public
          policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the
          final adjudication of such issue.
11549.

#### O’QUINN *v.*ROSS & BRINSON.

Decided November 2, 1920.

There was evidence tending to show that the defendants were indebted to the plaintiff for timber cut, in an amount more than the sum admitted in the answer of the defendants. This made a question of fact to be determined by the jury, and it was error in the court to direct a verdict for the amount admitted to be due by the defendants in their answer.

Complaint; from city court of Baxley-—Judge Lawrence. February 13, 1920.

*Padgett & Watson,*for plaintiff.

*C. H. Parker,*for defendant.

Smith, J.

S. P. O’Quinn sited J. A. Ross and M. D. Brinson, seeking to recover upon a written contract between the parties in which the defendants agreed to cut not less than 500,000 feet of *728timber off certain lots of land owned by the plaintiff. The petition alleged that the full amount of 500,000 feet had been cut, and that the defendants were indebted to the plaintiff $ 3 per thousand feet stumpage, and $3 per thousand feet for all the timber hauled by the plaintiff. A demurrer was filed to the petition, on the ground that it was uncertain whether the plaintiff was claiming damages for a breach of the written contract, or claiming $ 3 per thousand feet for the timber actually cut. The plaintiff amended his petition, abandoning the claim for damages growing out of a breach of the contract, but alleging that the defendants did cut 350,000 feet of timber, more or less, and that the defendants were indebted to him in the sum of $ 1,500 for the said timber, less $ 228.49 paid by the defendants. Thereupon the demurrer was overruled. The defendants then answered, admitting the contract, a copy of which was attached to the petition, but denying that they had violated the contract or that they had failed to account to and pay the plaintiff for all the timber actually cut by them as well as the bill for hauling, except the sum of $45.29, admitted to be due the plaintiff as a balance.

The evidence for the plaintiff tended to show that the defendants had cut more timber than admitted in their answer, and that the defendants were indebted to the plaintiff in a larger amount than the amount admitted in the answer. The defendants introduced no evidence, and the court directed a verdict for the amount admitted to be due by the defendants in their answer. This was error.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jenkins, P.J., and*Stephens, *J., concur.*
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1544 

To adjust the boundary of Big Bend National Park in the State of Texas, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2023 

Mr. TONY GONZALES of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To adjust the boundary of Big Bend National Park in the 

State of Texas, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Big Bend National 

5 Park Boundary Adjustment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ entitled ‘‘Big Bend 

9 National Park, Proposed Boundary Adjustment’’, 

10 numbered 155/167,296, and dated November 2022. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1544 IH

1 (2) PARK.—The term ‘‘Park’’ means the Big 

2 Bend National Park, established pursuant to the Act 

3 of June 20, 1935 (49 Stat. 393; 16 U.S.C. 156). 

4 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

5 the Secretary of the Interior. 

6 SEC. 3. BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK BOUNDARY ADJUST7 MENT. 

8 (a) LAND ACQUISITION.—The Secretary is author9 ized to acquire approximately 6,100 acres of lands or in10 terests in land generally depicted on the map as ‘‘Tracts 

11 to Include in Boundary’’ by donation, purchase from will12 ing sellers, or exchange. 

13 (b) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map shall be on file 

14 and available for public inspection in the appropriate of15 fices of the National Park Service, the Department of the 

16 Interior. 

17 (c) BOUNDARY REVISION AND ADMINISTRATION.— 

18 Upon the acquisition of any lands or interests in land pur19 suant to subsection (a), the Secretary shall revise the 

20 boundary of the Park to include the acquisition, and shall 

21 administer such lands or interests in land as part of the 

22 Park in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1544 IH

1 (d) EMINENT DOMAIN OR CONDEMNATION.—In car2 rying out this Act, the Secretary may not use eminent do3 main or condemnation. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS