alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.01

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nashua Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Andrew B. Albert, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

            (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

                                          /s/ Andrew B. Albert
                                          ------------------------------
Dated: March 15, 2004                     Andrew B. Albert
       ---------------                    Chairman, President and
                                          Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraniteBroadcasting Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the Form 10-Q), we, W. Don Cornwell and Ellen McClain, Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

 

(i)                   theForm 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) orsection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)                theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   November 12, 2003. |                                                                                  |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  | /s/           W.  DON CORNWELL |   |
|                                  | W. Don Cornwell                                                                       |
|                                  | Chief  Executive Officer                                                              |

 

 
|   |   |   |   | /s/           ELLEN  McCLAIN |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   |   | Ellen McClain                                                                       |
|   |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer                                                             |

 

----
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22

-0707

_________________ SCOTT AND PAMELA BYE; KOREY AND WENDY FAUQUE; BUTCH AND DOREEN GILLESPIE; WAYNE AND ROXY GILLESPIE, and JOHN DOES 1, 2, 3, 4,

Plaintiffs and Appellees

v. SOMONT OIL COMPANY, INC.

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 3 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve the Reply Brief in this case. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 13 2023

04/13/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0707
United States Department of Com

National Institute of Standards and Technolo

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

Utah 

his laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, andhas demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate. The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope 

Mass Echelon III Volume Transfer, II 25 kg to 1 mg 100 gal to 5 gal 

1000 lb to 0.001 lb 4 oz to 0.03125 oz Wheel Load Weighers 

20 000 lb to 5000 lb 

___________Douglas A. ONIST Office Effective Date

(Rev.: February 2020)
Exhibit  31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,  Geoffrey  Eiten,  certify  that:

1.     I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form 10-QSB of Mason Hill
Holdings,  Inc.
2.     Based  on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial statements, and other financial
information  included  in  this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this quarterly report.
4.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for  the  registrant  and  have:
     A)     designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during  the  period  in  which  this  quarterly  report  is  being  prepared;
B)     evaluated  the  effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  as  of  a  date  within  90  days  prior  to the filing date of this
quarterly  report  (the  "evaluation  date");  and                    C)
presented  in  this  quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on  our  evaluation as of the
evaluation  date;

5.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the equivalent
functions):
  A)     all  significant  deficiencies  in  the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have  identified for the
registrant's  auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and
     B)     any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material, that involves management or
other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the registrant's internal
controls.

6.     The  registrant's  other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether  or  not  there  were significant changes in internal
controls  or  in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent  to  the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions  with  regard  to  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses.

     Date:     February  24,  2004

     /s/  Geoffrey  Eiten
     Geoffrey  Eiten
     President
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio Ivan CERVANTES-MORALES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-10536.

D.C. No. CR-00-01019-ACM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2001 1.

Decided May 30, 2001.

Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

Sergio Ivan Cervantes-Morales appeals the judgment of conviction and 37-month sentence imposed after his guilty plea to being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Cervantes-Morales contends that in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court improperly imposed a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) because the government neither pled in the indictment nor established through the guilty plea that Cervantes-Morales had sustained a prior conviction for an aggravated felony. He also contends that *Apprendi*renders inapplicable *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a sentencing factor and not a separate offense). These arguments are foreclosed by *United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda,*234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), as *amended*(Feb. 8, 2001), *cert. denied,*— U.S. —, 121 S.Ct. 1503, — L.Ed.2d — (2001).

AFFIRMED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOE HENRY SCOTT, III, :

 :

Plaintiff, :

 :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0609-WS-M

 :

WALTER MYERS, et al, :

 :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this

file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been

no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED

as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be

and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to

prosecute and to obey the Court's Order.

DONE this 22nd day of March, 2010.

 S/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00609-WS-M Document 16 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Cash Financial Services,
 Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,
 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
 hereof (the "Report"), I, Phillip E. Powell, Chief Executive Officer of
 the Company, and R. Douglas Orr, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
 certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

      (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
           or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
           all material respects, the financial condition and results
           of operations of the Company.

 Date:  May 4, 2004


 /s/ PHILLIP E. POWELL
 ---------------------
 Phillip E. Powell
 Chief Executive Officer


 /s/ R. DOUGLAS ORR
 ------------------
 R. Douglas Orr
 Chief Financial Officer
! " #$%&' !
!
(! )*"*" 


#(+,-,,-+,	+$,$#	,

.


//////////"//////////

#

"0
















$"
(1

#(1


*2 0
1


!
 "0

2 0
1

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

	
	


	




#30 .


 .

.
4 
 !"" .
  
#$

%&'
 .

003"0
03"
)"
 
*
"


.."

" )"
5 
*6)

*7

0


)6.
#

"

$00""3 " #$

%88 9."

" .09: .
3*6"
0
"
.#;%4


.
"

""
.#$%&''&9.

<
..
6
33*)*
9

		..
0"1

-(+- ;	(,-.


="3
 "*603"
"


03"0
(as reflected in 

the last judgment issued)  0." ! "# 

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

		$


-<
3".
7"
3
9**3"".
> 0

 ".**
0



		



1

Judge’s signature

-


1

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

 Southern District of Alabama

WILLIAM REED, II 12-00069-002

12628-003

11-29-2012

Pro Se

✔

✔

108 87 months

11-29-2012

07-27-2015

11-01-2015 United States District Judge

Callie V.S. Granade 

U.S. District Judge

Digitally signed by Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge 

DN: cn=Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge, o=U.S. 

Government, ou=Federal Judiciary, 

email=efile_granade@alsd.uscourts.gov, c=US 

Date: 2015.07.24 14:38:34 -06'00'

Case 1:12-cr-00069-CG-N Document 158 Filed 07/27/15 Page 1 of 1
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




November 30, 2005



[Name]


[Address]



Dear      :



In consideration for your excellent work relating to the Microsoft antitrust case and your
continued employment with RealNetworks, I am pleased to offer you the bonus plan and
payments described in Exhibit A (the “Bonus Payments”).



You will be entitled to receive the Bonus Payments unless RealNetworks has terminated your
employment for Cause, as defined below, or you voluntarily choose to end your employment
with RealNetworks, in which case you will not be entitled to any Bonus Payments after the
date of your termination or voluntary resignation. Once paid, a Bonus Payment will be
considered final and irrevocable. If RealNetworks materially changes your job
responsibilities, moves your primary workplace by more than 15 miles or is acquired by a
third party, any subsequent resignation by you will not be considered “voluntary” and you
will be entitled to receive all Bonus Payments on your last day of employment. In the
event of your death or permanent disability, you or your heirs will be entitled to receive
all Bonus Payments within 30 days. In addition, in the event of any mutually agreed (a)
change in your employment status to part-time for a continuous period lasting greater than
three months or (b) leave of absence for a continuous period lasting greater than three
months, the Bonus Payments may be adjusted to reflect appropriately such change in status
(for example, by altering the payment schedule, pro-rating the payments, tolling the
payment schedule or such other mechanism as agreed by the parties). Notwithstanding the
previous sentence, there shall not be any adjustment to the Bonus Payments or schedule as
a result of any change in employment status relating to disability (other than a permanent
disability as described above), medical or family leave or other FMLA-related leave.



As used in this agreement, “Cause” means conduct involving one or more of the following:
(i) your substantial and continuing failure after written notice to render services to
RealNetworks in accordance with the terms or requirements of your employment for reasons
other than illness or incapacity; or (ii) willful misconduct, fraud, embezzlement, theft,
misrepresentation or dishonesty involving RealNetworks resulting in any case in material
harm to RealNetworks.



Sincerely,



Rob Glaser


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


RealNetworks, Inc.



I have read and agree to the terms of the incentive bonus agreement contained in this
letter.



Name:      



Date:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANGELA A. DUMAS, *

 *

Plaintiff, *

 *

vs. * Civil Action 09-00789-WS-B

 *

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, *

Commissioner of * 

Social Security, *

 *

Defendant. *

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made

under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated March 8, 2010, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this

Court. 

Accordingly, for good cause shown and because no answer has been filed, it is ORDERED

that Defendant’s unopposed Motion to Remand (Doc. 10) be and is hereby GRANTED and that

this action is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration pursuant to sentence six of 42

U.S.C. § 405(g), so that the Commissioner can remand the case to the Administrative Law Judge

to complete the administrative record. 

Under this remand pursuant to sentence six of Section 405(g), Plaintiff is not a prevailing

party for purposes of the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. See, Shalala v.

Schafer, 509 U.S. 292, 297-298 and 300-302, 113 S. Ct. 2625, 2629 and 2631-2632, 125 L. Ed. 2d

239 (1993).

DONE and ORDERED this the 6th day of April, 2010.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00789-WS-B Document 13 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    
    /s/ Alec C. CovingtonName:
    
    Alec C. CovingtonTitle:
    
    President and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    
    /s/ Robert B. DimondName:
    
    Robert B. DimondTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1623 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to exclude certain propane 

storage facilities from certain chemical security standards under the 

Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2023 

Mr. FINSTAD (for himself and Mr. COSTA) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to exclude 

certain propane storage facilities from certain chemical 

security standards under the Department of Homeland 

Security, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1623 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN PROPANE STORAGE 

2 FACILITIES FROM CERTAIN CHEMICAL SECU3 RITY STANDARDS UNDER THE DEPARTMENT 

4 OF HOMELAND SECURITY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title XXI of the Homeland Secu6 rity Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 621 et seq.) is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (4) of section 2101— 

8 (A) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘or’’ 

9 after the semicolon at the end; 

10 (B) in subparagraph (E), by inserting ‘‘or’’ 

11 after the semicolon at the end; and 

12 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

13 subparagraph: 

14 ‘‘(F) subject to section 2110, a facility 

15 that stores propane for sale to or use by a 

16 dwelling (as such term is defined in section 

17 802(b) of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 

18 3602(b))), sale to or use in agricultural produc19 tion (as such term is defined in section 4279.2 

20 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations), or sale 

21 to or use by small business concerns (as such 

22 term is described under section 3 of the Small 

23 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)) that are located 

24 in rural areas (as such term is defined in sec25 tion 520 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 

26 U.S.C. 1490));’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1623 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end the following new sec2 tion: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 2110. DETERMINATION RELATING TO CERTAIN PRO4 PANE STORAGE FACILITIES. 

5 ‘‘If the Secretary makes a determination that a pro6 pane storage facility does not satisfy the requirements of 

7 an excluded facility, the Secretary shall— 

8 ‘‘(1) submit to Congress a report relating there9 to; and 

10 ‘‘(2) provide notification to the owner or oper11 ator of such propane storage facility relating there12 to.’’. 

13 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—The table of contents 

14 in section 1(b) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 is 

15 amended by inserting after the item relating to section 

16 2109 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 2110. Determination relating to certain propane storage facilities.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
|   | 1. | The Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  April 27, 2010 | /s/ Lee W. Hendrickson                                                                                                             Lee W. HendricksonChief Financial Officer |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|