alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The SABSA Institute (TSI) would like to take advantage of the oppo1tunity to provide 

input into the next version of the NIST Cybersecmity Framework (CSF). Many 

organizations that have or are developing SABSA-based secmity architecnll'es also use 

the NIST CSF. The NIST CSF has become one of the more popular secmity 

:frameworks, embraced by many industries, regulato1y bodies and even countries as the 

leading method for applying processes and conn·ols to deal with ever-evolving cyber 

threats. 

The SABSA Institute (TSI) is recommending additions to the NIST CSF v2 related to 

three (3) specific themes (Themes #4, #5 and #6) outlined in the NIST CSF V2 

Concept Paper. 

Please find attached the recommendations drafted by the The SABSA Institute 

workgroup lead by Glen Brnce. 

Can you confum receipt of this e-mail? 

Thank you. 

Kind Regards, 

Maruice Smit 

deputy Chief Architect and Board of Trnstee member of the SABSA Institute
#### Huston *v.*Roosa.

APPEAL from the Wayne Common Pleas.

*TV. A. Peelle*and *H. C. Fox,*for appellant.

*W. A. Bickle*and *J. B. Julian,*for appellee.

Downev, J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellant and one Fitzgerald, to compel the surrender and cancellation of a promissory note, and there was final judgment for the *plaintiff. Huston alone*appeals and has assigned errors, without complying with section 551, 2 G. *&*H. 270. The appeal is for this cause dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.
#### Mary H. Pennell, plaintiff and respondent, *vs.*Edwin Wilson, defendant and appellant.

In an action of an equitable nature, where the entire question of costs will be in the discretion of the court, and may be adjudged upon the final hearing, no direction as to costs ought to be made by the general term, on awarding a new trial, because of the insufficiency of the evidence.

(Before Barbour, Monell and Garvist, JJ.)

Heard March 13, 1865;

decided May 27, 1865.

Motion by the respondent to modify an order of this court, made at a general term, directing a judgment to be reversed, and awarding a new trial, 'with costs to abide the event.

*J. W. Gerard,*for the appellant.

*John Heiuitt,*for the respondent.

JBy the Court,

Barbour, J.

This is an action brought to reform an agreement for the sale of lands, and was tried before a justice of this court, without a jury. At a late general term the court, upon an appeal, directed the judgment to be reversed, and awarded a new trial, *with costs to abide the event,*upon the sole ground that the evidence given upon the trial was insufficient to authorize such judgment, and an order to that effect was accordingly settled and entered. A motion is now made, on the part of the respondent, to so modify that order as to charge the appellant with the costs.

It has long been the practice in this state, in cases in which judgments have been set aside and new trials directed, in actions at law, because of the insufficiency of the evidence to warrant the verdict, to charge the appellant with the costs. *(Jackson*v. *Thurston,*3 *Cowen,*342, *Goodyear*v. *Ogden,*4 *Mill,*104. *Bank of Utica*v. *Ives,*17 *Wend.*501. *Ward*v. *Woodburn,*27 *Barb.*354.) Ho similar practice, however, ever obtained in the Court of Chancery, where the entire ques*611tion of costs was determined by the court upon a final hearing on the merits; nor, since the adoption of the Code of Procedure, has a like rule been extended to actions of an equitable nature.

We think that in cases like this, where the entire question of costs will be in the' discretion of the court, and may be adjudicated upon the final hearing, no direction as to. costs ought to be made by the general term, on awarding a new trial, because of the insufficiency of the evidence.

The order in question will be amended accordingly.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 3 on Form 10-K/A of Huntsman Corporation and Huntsman International LLC (the "Companies")
for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Kimo Esplin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.

|/s/J. KIMO ESPLINJ. Kimo Esplin Chief Financial OfficerJuly 3,
2008 |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 75138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29530]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-605-000]


Solea PJM, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Solea PJM, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is December 31, 2014.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b1d1e091814353732353e082e2b2b34292f1b3d3e2938753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="21676473626e4f4d484f44725451514e535561474453420f464e57">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 11, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29530 Filed 12-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### James Saffell, et al., *v.*City of Frankfort.

Taxation — Sale of Real Estate at Tax Sale.

Proceedings to sell property for taxes must substantially conform to tbe statute; tbe omission of any step deemed essential to protect tbe taxpayer renders a tax sale void.

APPEAL FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT.

January *25,*1876.

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

The charter of the city of Frankfort gives ample means of en*585forcing the payment of taxes due the city, and there was no necessity, and therefore no' right to come into equity to enforce payment. *Johnson v. Louisville,*Mss. Opinion. Whether the appellants can hold the property discharged from the lien, if any, resting upon it when they purchased from Haley, is a question which does not arise in this case. If the city has a lien which might be enforced against them in a court of equity it can be enforced by pursuing the mode pointed out in the charter.

*W. H. Sneed, for appellants. Lindsey, G. C. Drane, for appellee.*

There seems never to have been an advertisement of the storehouse and residence for sale for the taxes for the year 1870. It is a well-established rule that proceedings to sell property for taxes must be in substantial conformity to the statute, and that the omission of any step in the proceeding deemed essential for the protection of the taxpayer renders the sale void. The advertisement required by the charter was intended for the benefit of the owners of property, and the alleged sales for taxes without advertising are void, and being void the sales do not affect the rights of either party or the remedy of the city.

If the sales had been merely voidable at the election of the owner of the property, the city could have enforced payment by suit in equity, for in that case it would have been without any other remedy.

The judgment is *reversed*and the cause is remanded with directions to dismiss the petition. Judgment *affirmed*on cross-appeal.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1484 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1484

   To amend title 49, United States Code, to establish a penalty for 
  causing a defect in pipeline infrastructure, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2023

  Mr. Bost (for himself, Mr. Crawford, and Mr. Nehls) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
  and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and 
Commerce, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 49, United States Code, to establish a penalty for 
  causing a defect in pipeline infrastructure, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pipeline Sabotage and Accident 
Prevention Act''.

SEC. 2. PENALTY FOR CAUSING A DEFECT IN OR DISRUPTING OPERATION OF 
              PIPELINE INFRASTRUCTURE.

    Section 60123 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(e) Penalty for Causing a Defect in or Disrupting Operation of 
Pipeline Infrastructure.--
            ``(1) In general.--A person knowingly and willfully--
                    ``(A) causing, or threatening to cause, a defect in 
                a pipe, pump, or valve intended to be used or used in 
                any pipeline facility described in subsection (b) that 
                would affect the integrity or safe operation of any 
                such facility shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned 
                for not more than 10 years, or both; or
                    ``(B) disrupting the operation of any such facility 
                shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned for not more 
                than 10 years, or both.
            ``(2) Rule of statutory construction.--Nothing in this 
        subsection abridges the exercise of rights guaranteed under the 
        First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1596 

To amend the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection 

Act to repeal the exemption from enhanced supervision and prudential 

standards applicable to bank holding companies with total consolidated 

assets between $50,000,000,000 and $250,000,000,000. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2023 

Mr. MOULTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and 

Consumer Protection Act to repeal the exemption from 

enhanced supervision and prudential standards applicable 

to bank holding companies with total consolidated assets 

between $50,000,000,000 and $250,000,000,000. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stabilizing Vulnerable 

5 Banks Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1596 IH

1 SEC. 2. ENHANCED SUPERVISION AND PRUDENTIAL STAND2 ARDS FOR CERTAIN BANK HOLDING COMPA3 NIES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 401 of the Economic 

5 Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act 

6 (Public Law 115–174) is hereby repealed and the provi7 sions of law amended by such section are revived or re8 stored as if such section had not been enacted. 

9 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

10 for the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Con11 sumer Protection Act is amended by striking the item re12 lating to section 401. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>

                   EXHIBIT 32.1 -- SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Richard L. Wambold, certify that:

     (1) the Form 10-K of Pactiv Corporation for the period ended December 31,
         2005, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of sec.13(a)
         or sec.15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Pactiv Corporation for the period then ended.

/s/ RICHARD L. WAMBOLD
------------------------------------------------------
Richard L. Wambold
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

March 16, 2006
------------------------------------------------------
Date

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of BF Acquisition Group
V,  Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the  period  ending
April  30,  2007  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report"),  I,  William  R.
Colucci, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and
          (2)  The  information contained in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 29, 2007

                                  /s/  William   R. Colucci
                                  -----------------------------
                                  William R. Colucci, Treasurer
                                  BF Acquisition Group V, Inc.
#### Robert L. TAYLOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 00-7619.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 27, 2001.

Decided May 3, 2001.

Robert L. Taylor, pro se.

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Taylor v. Director, Va. Dep’t of Corrections,*No. CA-00-1190-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2000). We deny the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1555 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1555

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
2300 Sylvan Avenue in Modesto, California, as the ``Corporal Michael D. 
                  Anderson Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CORPORAL MICHAEL D. ANDERSON JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2300 Sylvan Avenue in Modesto, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Corporal Michael D. Anderson Jr. Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Michael D. Anderson Jr. Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
| EXHIBIT      32.1 |
|-------------------|

| Chief      Executive Officer Certification |
|--------------------------------------------|

| Pursuant      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section    906 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| of      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|----------------------------------------|

| 1.   | The      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  April 30,      2008 | /s/ Joseph D.      Reid                                                                                       Joseph      D. ReidChief      Executive Officer |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
<PAGE>
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Exhibit 12

                                MOBIL CORPORATION
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     (In millions, except for ratio amount)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Year Ended December 31,
                                     --------------------------------------------------
                                       1994       1995       1996      1997       1998
                                     -------    -------    -------   -------    -------
<S>                                  <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>    
Income Before Change in
  Accounting Principle ...........   $ 1,759    $ 2,376    $ 2,964   $ 3,272    $ 1,704
Add:
  Income taxes ...................     1,919      2,015      3,147     3,093      1,356
  Portion of rents representative
    of interest factor ...........       340        368        376       346        317
  Interest and amortization
    of debt discount expense .....       461        467        455       428        451
  Earnings less (greater)
    than dividends from
    equity affiliates ............       (40)       (51)       153       (59)       329
                                     -------    -------    -------   -------    -------
Income as Adjusted ...............   $ 4,439    $ 5,175    $ 7,095   $ 7,080    $ 4,157
                                     =======    =======    =======   =======    =======

Fixed Charges:
  Interest and amortization
    of debt discount expense .....   $   461    $   467    $   455   $   428    $   451
  Capitalized interest ...........        37         47         78       101         74
  Portion of rents representative
    of interest factor ...........       340        368        376       346        317
                                     -------    -------    -------   -------    -------
Total Fixed Charges ..............   $   838    $   882    $   909   $   875    $   842
                                     =======    =======    =======   =======    =======

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges       5.3        5.9        7.8       8.1        4.9
                                     =======    =======    =======   =======    =======
</TABLE>

For the years ended December 31, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998, Fixed Charges
exclude $37 million, $28 million, $24 million, $29 million and $25 million,
respectively, of interest expense attributable to debt issued by the Mobil Oil
Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan Trust and guaranteed by Mobil.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mobil                              - 29 -