alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 CIRCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC. 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 1999 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN 
  

	A.	The CIRCOR International, Inc. Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plan is hereby amended by adding the following to the end of Section 18(g):


  
 “With respect to any Award that is subject
to Section 409A, any deferral election must generally be made in the year prior to the year in which compensation is to be earned; provided, however, that (1) a deferral election for compensation to be earned in 2005 may be made prior to
March 15, 2005, (2) a deferral election for a Deferred Stock Award that does not vest until at least 13 months from the Award date may be made within 30 days of the Award date, and (3) in the case of the first year in which a grantee
becomes eligible to make deferrals, the deferral election of such grantee may be made with respect to services to be performed subsequent to the election within 30 days after the date the grantee first becomes eligible to make deferrals. All
elections as to timing of distribution of Awards subject to Section 409A are irrevocable except that grantees are permitted to make a one-time change in 2005. Any distribution of Awards subject to Section 409A to a key employee (as defined
in Section 416(i) of the Code without regard to paragraph (5) thereof) on account of separation from service shall be delayed until at least six months after such separation from service.” 
  

	B.	The effective date of this First Amendment is as of January 1, 2005. 

  
 Executed this 1st day
of December, 2005 by a duly authorized officer of CIRCOR International, Inc. 
  

			
	CIRCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
	
	 By: /s/ Alan J. Glass


	     Alan J. Glass
     General Counsel & Asst. Secretary
Exhibit  32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Mason Hill Holdings,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for  the  quarter  ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned  Geoffrey Eiten, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of  Mason  Hill  Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  September  24,  2004

                                      /s/Geoffrey  Eiten
                                       Chief  Executive  Officer

                                      /s/Geoffrey  Eiten
                                       Chief  Financial  Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1547 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a study on the costs 

and benefits of commuter rail passenger transportation involving transfers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2023 

Mr. KEAN of New Jersey (for himself and Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a study 

on the costs and benefits of commuter rail passenger 

transportation involving transfers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘One Seat Ride Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. STUDY ON COMMUTER SERVICE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Transportation, 

7 in consultation with the Administrators of the Federal 

8 Transit Administration and the Federal Railroad AdminVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:06 Mar 26, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1547.IH H1547

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1547 IH

1 istration, shall conduct a study analyzing the costs and 

2 benefits of providing commuter rail passenger transpor3 tation that does not involve a transfer compared with the 

4 costs and benefits of providing commuter rail passenger 

5 transportation involving a transfer. 

6 (b) REQUIREMENTS.—In conducting the study under 

7 subsection (a), the Secretary shall— 

8 (1) consider economic, logistical, and quality of 

9 life factors in analyzing the costs and benefits of the 

10 different types of commuter rail passenger transpor11 tation identified in such subsection; and 

12 (2) include in such study an analysis of such 

13 costs and benefits with respect to commuter rail pas14 senger transportation on the New Jersey Transit 

15 Raritan Valley line during peak hours. 

16 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 9 months after the date 

17 of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 

18 the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of 

19 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Com20 merce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report 

21 on the study conducted under subsection (a). 

22 (d) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘com23 muter rail passenger transportation’’ has the meaning 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 1547 IH

1 given such term in section 24102 of title 49, United States 

2 Code. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
OWM Organizational Structure

(effective February 1, 2024)

Katrice Lippa, Chief

National

Legal Metrology

David Sefcik*

Jan

Konijnenburg

G. Diane Lee

John McGuire

Loren Minnich

Juana Williams

International 

Legal Metrology

Chuck Ehrlich*

Katya Delak

Michael Nelson

Jan

Konijnenburg

Ralph Richter

Laboratory 

Metrology

Micheal Hicks*

Isabel Baucom 

Chavez

Elizabeth (Els) 

Koncki

Lisa Corn^

Mark 

Ruefenacht^

Kate Smetana^

Jose TorresFerrer^

Metric/SI

Elizabeth 

Benham*

Maryanne 

Amanze^

Nicole Moore 

Office Manager

Yvonne Branden

Training Coordinator

Cyra Golwalla^

Tina Butcher

Training Specialist

Vacancy

AV Production Specialist

*Program Leader

Reemployed Annuitant

^Associate
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,306,352
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  323,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,639,527
<PP&E>                                       2,785,594
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,379,698
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,315,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          644,933
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          5
<COMMON>                                        16,294
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,653,915
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,315,147
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,196,037
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  917,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,503,549
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (40,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,149,571)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,149,571)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,543,132)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
11392.

#### Rice *v.*The State.

Decided May 11, 1920.

Conviction of involuntary manslaughter; from Fulton superior court — Judge Humphries. February 21, 1920.

*B. H. & Harvey Hill, Tillou Von Nunes,*for plaintiff in error.

*John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, E. A. Stephens,*contra.

Luke, J.

The charge of the court as to impeachment of witnesses did not confuse and mislead the jury; and when the entire charge is read, there is no harmful error in the instructions complained of.

The verdict of involuntary manslaughter was authorized by the evidence; and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SHANTELL WILLIAMS, )

Petitioner, )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION 09-440-KD-M 

CYNTHIA WHEELER-WHITE, )

Respondent. )

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT be entered in favor of

Respondent Cynthia Wheeler-White and against Petitioner Shantell Williams. 

Petitioner is not entitled to a Certificate of Appealability and, therefore, she is not entitled

to appeal in forma pauperis.

DONE this February 23, 2010. 

s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00440-KD-M Document 17 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 1
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KE DA FU,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 20

- 71805

Agency No. A075

- 502

- 854

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 18, 2021 * *

Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Ke Da Fu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of t he Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“ BIA”) ord er dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of

removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 71805

evidence the agency’s factual findings. Ze hatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

-

85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Fu did not

establish a well

- founded fear of persecution. See Gu v. Gonzales , 454 F.3d 1014,

1022 (9th Cir. 2006) (applicant failed “to present compelling, objective evidence

demonstrating a well

- founded fear of persecution”); Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241,

1245 (9th Cir. 2000) (two

- year period of continued residence without harm

following the incident that formed the basis of the applicant’s claim did not support

an objective fear of persecution ). Thus, Fu’s asylum claim fails.

In this case, because Fu failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he failed to

establish eligibility for withholding of removal. See Zehatye , 453 F.3d at 1190.

In light of this disposition, we need not reach Fu’s remaining contentions

regarding his asylum and withholding of removal claims. See Simeonov v.

Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts and agencies are not required

to decide issues unnecessary to the r esults they reach).

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the

mandate. The motion for a stay of removal is otherwise denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Ronald Mustari, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of Whitehall Limited, Inc. certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Whitehall Limited,
Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to
be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change
in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the
registrant's control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 16, 2004

| |  |                                                      
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Ronald Mustari                                   
| |  |                                                      
| |  | Ronald Mustari, President and
Chief Executive Officer
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1568 

AN ACT 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to protect personally 

identifiable information, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1568 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Moving Americans Pri3 vacy Protection Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE IN5 FORMATION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 431(c) 

7 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1431(c)) is amended 

8 to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(2)(A) The information listed in paragraph (1) shall 

10 not be available for public disclosure if— 

11 ‘‘(i) the Secretary of the Treasury makes an af12 firmative finding on a shipment-by-shipment basis 

13 that disclosure is likely to pose a threat of personal 

14 injury or property damage; or 

15 ‘‘(ii) the information is exempt under the provi16 sions of section 552(b)(1) of title 5, United States 

17 Code. 

18 ‘‘(B) The Secretary shall ensure that any personally 

19 identifiable information, including Social Security num20 bers and passport numbers, is removed from any manifest 

21 signed, produced, delivered, or electronically transmitted 

22 under this section before access to the manifest is provided 

23 to the public.’’. 
3 

•HR 1568 EH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 30 days 

3 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 18, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1568 

AN ACT 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to protect personposes. ally identifiable information, and for other pur-
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(u)



AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO THE

JOHN W. BIDDINGER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

          This Agreement amends by adding a longer term to the existing
Amendment Number one of the Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") dated April
28, 1993, between SunGroup, Inc. (the "Company"), and John W. Biddinger (the
"Employee").

          Amendment Number One dated April 28, 1993, will be amended by
substituting a new Amendment as follows:

          1.   Employment and Term. Company does hereby employ Employee and
               Employee does hereby agree to enter into the employment of the
               Company for the compensation provided under the terms and
               conditions hereinafter set forth. The term of this Agreement
               shall commence on April 7, 1995, (the "Commencement Date") and
               shall continue for a term ending on the first to occur of the
               death of the Employee, or May 31, 2000, unless continued by
               written agreement of both parties or terminated as set forth
               herein. Company and Employee both concur that this contract
               should be extended by January 31, 1999, if both parties want to
               continue the employment relationship. Employee should take the
               responsibility to initiate contract extension discussions in late
               1998.

Dated: April 7, 1995


                                    SUNGROUP, INC.



                                    By:   /s/ James M. Elliott
                                          -------------------------------
                                          James M. Elliott, Director



                                    By:   /s/ Dan E. Young
                                          -------------------------------
                                          Dan E. Young, Director

                                    EMPLOYEE



                                    By:   /s/ John W. Biddinger
                                          -------------------------------
                                          John W. Biddinger

                                       42
#### Louisville & N. R. Co. *v.*Thos. A. Elkins.

Railroads — Loss by Fire From Locomotives.

A railroad company is not liable for every possible loss that might arise an consequence of the use of fire, in its locomotives, but it must ■ exercise the highest degree of care in running its locomotives to secure the safety of the property of others.

APPEAL PROM GARRARD CIRCUIT COURT.

January 10, 1874.

*Dunlap, McKee, for appellant.*

*Hopper, for' appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Bardin:

As it appears from the evidence that the appellee’s claims for damage caused by burning his grass and cord wood, were adjusted and satisfied upon the compromise of another suit, we cannot see that the verdict for $240, which could only have been for the appellee’s damage for killing and injuring his cattle, could be sustained by, the evidence.

We think also that the court erred in instructing the jury, in effect, that it was the duty of the corporation to provide against all possibility of fire communicated from their engines. It was the defendant’s duty to use the highest care and prudence in running its trains, to do so with safety to the property of others; but we cannot concur with the views of the court below that it was responsible for every possible loss that might arise in consequence of the use of fire in its engines.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded, for a new trial.
Exhibit 32.2
**Written Statement of the ChiefFinancial Officer****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350**
     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, theundersigned Chief Financial Officer of Whitehall Limited, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBof the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
*/s/ Kay Carter*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0000839092
<NAME>    MEDICAL EQUIPMENT INCOME FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                          565628
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   371535
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                565628
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1132488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           76391
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                      1056097
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1132488
<SALES>                         244988
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                244988
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                373655
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (128667)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.000
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TONY LAMAR MAYE, *

 *

Plaintiff, *

 *

vs. * Civil Action No. 04-00781-BH-B

 *

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, *

Commissioner of * 

Social Security, *

 *

Defendant. *

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of

this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo

determination of those portions of the Report and

Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B) and dated March 31, 2006, is ADOPTED as the

opinion of this Court and the decision of the Commissioner of

Social Security, denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability

insurance and supplemental security income benefits, is hereby

AFFIRMED.

It is so ORDERED.

DONE this 25th day of April, 2006.

 s/ W. B. Hand 

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-00781-BH-B Document 13 Filed 04/25/06 Page 1 of 1