alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 24




                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                    FORM 10-K FOR YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 1996

    The undersigned  directors and officers of NATIONAL COMPUTER  SYSTEMS,  INC.
hereby  constitute  and  appoint  J. W.  Fenton,  Jr.,  their  true  and  lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, for each of them and in their name, place and stead,
in any and all capacities  (including  without  limitation,  as Director  and/or
principal Executive Officer,  principal Financial Officer,  principal Accounting
Officer or any other officer of the Company),  to sign its Annual Report on Form
10-K  for the year  ended  January  31,  1996,  which  is to be  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission,  with all exhibits thereto, and any and all
documents in connection  therewith,  hereby granting unto said  attorney-in-fact
and agent full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things
requisite and necessary to be done, and hereby ratifying and confirming all that
said attorney-in-fact and agent may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

    IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this 4th
day of March, 1996.


/s/ RUSSELL A. GULLOTTI                    /s/ STEPHEN G. SHANK
----------------------------------------   -------------------------------------
    Russell A. Gullotti                        Stephen G. Shank

/s/ DAVID P. CAMPBELL                      /s/ JOHN E. STEURI
----------------------------------------   -------------------------------------
    David P. Campbell                          John E. Steuri

/s/ DAVID C. COX                           /s/ JEFFREY E. STIEFLER
---------------------------------------    -------------------------------------
    David C. Cox                               Jeffrey E. Stiefler

/s/ JEAN B. KEFFELER                       /S/ JOHN W. VESSEY
----------------------------------------  --------------------------------------
    Jean B. Keffeler                           John W. Vessey

/s/ CHARLES W. OSWALD                      /s/ JEFFREY W. TAYLOR
----------------------------------------  --------------------------------------
    Charles W. Oswald                          Jeffrey W. Taylor
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-54487) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan of Nash Finch
Company, Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-64313) pertaining to the 1995
Director Stock Option Plan of Nash Finch Company, Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-27563) pertaining to the 1997 Non-Employee Director Stock
Compensation Plan, and Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-81441)
pertaining to the Nash Finch Company 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, of our
report dated February 22, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Nash Finch Company included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended January 1, 2000.

                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 30, 2000
Strategic Value of Standar

Standards are a bridge between 

markets and technologies 

Markets: Tec•Consumer

•Commercial•Government

Standards

Wh t l th b id Whoever controls the bridge 

controls the future...
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4775 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4775

     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
   participate in the El Paso, Texas, water reclamation, reuse, and 
            desalinization project, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 7, 2004

 Mr. Reyes (for himself, Mr. Ortiz, Mr. Hinojosa, and Mrs. Napolitano) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
   participate in the El Paso, Texas, water reclamation, reuse, and 
            desalinization project, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EL PASO, TEXAS, WATER RECLAMATION, REUSE, AND DESALINIZATION 
              PROJECT.

    (a) Authorization.--The Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 
Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102-575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h 
et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 16__. EL PASO, TEXAS, WATER RECLAMATION, REUSE, AND 
              DESALINIZATION PROJECT.

    ``(a) Authorization.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the State 
and local authorities, is authorized to participate in the design, 
planning, and construction of the El Paso Water Reclamation, Reuse, and 
Desalinization project to reclaim and reuse wastewater and to treat and 
reuse impaired and brackish groundwater in the service area of the El 
Paso Water Utilities Public Service Board, El Paso, Texas.
    ``(b) Cost Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
authorized by this section shall not exceed 50 percent of the total 
cost of the project.
    ``(c) Limitation.--The Secretary shall not provide funds for the 
operation and maintenance of the project authorized by this section.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections in section 2 of such 
Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 16__ the 
following:

``Sec. 16__. El Paso, Texas, water reclamation, reuse, and 
                            desalinization project.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Nortia Capital Partners, Inc. (the
“Company”), on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Bruce A. Hall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best
      of
      my knowledge, Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002,





i.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





ii.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                BRUCE A. HALLBruce
                A. Hall, Chief Financial OfficerDate:
                August 13, 2008
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     I,  Geoffrey  Eiten,  certify  that:

          1.     I  have  reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mason
Hill  Holdings,  Inc.

          2.     Based  on  my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any  untrue  statement  of  a  material  fact  or  omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this  quarterly  report.

          3.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial statements, and other
financial  information  included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of  the  registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the periods presented in this quarterly
report.

          4.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  are
responsible  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as  defined  in  Exchange  Act  rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:

     A)     designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during  the  period  in  which  this  quarterly  report  is  being  prepared;

     B)     evaluated  the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  as  of  a  date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly  report  (the  "evaluation  date");  and

     C)     presented  in  this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as  of  the  evaluation  date;

          5.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the  audit  committee  of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the  equivalent  functions):

     A)     all  significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have  identified for the
registrant's  auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and

     B)     any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material, that involves management or
other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the registrant's internal
controls.

          6.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated
in  this  quarterly  report  whether  or  not  there were significant changes in
internal  controls  or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls  subsequent  to  the  date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective  actions  with  regard  to  significant  deficiencies  and  material
weaknesses.

     Date:     August  8,  2005

     /s/  Geoffrey  Eiten
     --------------------
     Geoffrey  Eiten
     President
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1667 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to identify and develop campsites 

and related facilities for public use in the Ouachita National Forest, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2023 

Mr. WESTERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to identify and develop campsites and related facilities for public use in 

the Ouachita National Forest, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ouachita National 

5 Forest Overnight Camping Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF OVERNIGHT CAMPSITES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall— 

8 (1) not later than 6 months after the date of 

9 the enactment of this Act, identify areas within AlVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:14 Mar 30, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1667.IH H1667

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1667 IH

1 bert Pike Recreation Area that may be suitable for 

2 overnight camping; and 

3 (2) not later than 2 years after the date of the 

4 enactment of this Act— 

5 (A) review each area identified under para6 graph (1); and 

7 (B) from the areas so identified, select and 

8 establish campsites and related facilities within 

9 Albert Pike Recreation Area for public use. 

10 (b) REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO CAMPSITES AND

11 RELATED FACILITIES.—The Secretary shall— 

12 (1) ensure that at least 54 campsites are avail13 able under subsection (a), of which not less than 8 

14 shall have electric and water hookups; and 

15 (2) ensure that each campsite and related facil16 ity identified or established under subsection (a) is 

17 located outside of the 1 percent annual exceedance 

18 probability flood elevation. 

19 (c) REOPENING OF CERTAIN SITES.—Not later than 

20 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

21 Secretary shall open each campsite within Albert Pike 

22 Recreation Area that— 

23 (1) exists on the date of the enactment of this 

24 Act; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1667 IH

1 (2) is located outside of the 1 percent annual 

2 exceedance probability flood elevation. 

3 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

4 (1) ALBERT PIKE RECREATION AREA.—The 

5 term ‘‘Albert Pike Recreation Area’’ means the Al6 bert Pike Recreation Area and grounds associated 

7 with such area located in the Ouachita National 

8 Forest, approximately six miles north of Langley, 

9 Arkansas in southern Montgomery County, Arkan10 sas. 

11 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

12 the Secretary of Agriculture. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.7

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT is entered into as of this 7 day of December, 2005, by and
between Oriens Life Sciences (Israel) Ltd., a private company duly registered in
Israel (the "Company"), and Dr. Shay Goldstein (the "Executive").

WHEREAS the Executive currently serves in the role of Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, pursuant to an Employment Agreement dated May 31, 2005 (the
"Agreement"; all capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall
have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement); and

WHEREAS the Company and the Executive both wish to continue the Executive's
employment with the Company, in the position of Chief Medical Officer ("CMO") of
the Company, under the terms and conditions set forth herein.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and
agreements herein contained, the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows:

      1.    From and after December 1, 2005 (the "Effective Date"), the
            Executive shall serve as the CMO of the Company and of the Parent
            Company, and perform all duties of a CMO for the Company and the
            Parent Company.

      2.    The Executive's gross monthly Salary for performing the duties of
            CMO for the Company and the Parent Company shall be US$ 8,000. To
            prevent any doubt, the Executive shall not be entitled to any
            additional compensation for duties performed on behalf of the Parent
            Company.

      3.    Any provision of the Agreement not specifically amended herein shall
            remain unaffected in effect and in force, mutatis mutandis.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Amendment, effective as
of the date first written above.

ORIENS LIFE SCIENCES (ISRAEL) LTD.              EXECUTIVE


Per: /s/ Amnon Presler                          /s/ Shay Goldstein
     -----------------------                    ------------------
Name: Amnon Presler                             Shay Goldstein
Title: Chief Executive Officer


                                      -6-
#### Reuben Gill *v.*Milton Farmer.

Sheriff — Service of Process — Judgment.

A sheriff or his deputy has no power to serve civil process out of his county and when he does so his return is not proof of service.

Judgment.

A judgment entered without the service of process, where there is no appearance by the defendant to the action, is void.

APPEAL FROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT.

October 18, 1876.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

The deputy sheriff of Daviess county had no power to serve the *771summons in McLean county. His return is “executed on Reuben Gill in McLean county, April 29, 1875, by delivering him a true copy1 of the within, which I accept,” signed Reuben Gill. The deputy signed his name in his official capacity at the place on the paper where it is usual to attest such papers.

*G. W.*Ray, *for appellant. Owen &*Ellis, *for appellee.*

The Code requires that service may be acknowledged by the defendant by an. endorsement on the summons, signed and dated by him and attested by a return. The affidavit of the witness should be proof of service, etc. There is no proof of the service or acknowledgment in this case, nor is there any attestation to the act of the defendant in signing it. In New York, under a similar provision, where the sheriff served the summons out of the county, it is said, “The proof of service must be by affidavit; his certificate of service is of no avail.” There is no proof of service whatever in this case, and the judgment was therefore void. If the last judgment had been proper, we see no reason why the commissioner should not sell to satisfy both judgments, as the cases were consolidated. The judgment is *reversed*and cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF NASHFINCH COMPANY

 

 
| **Subsidiary  Corporation**              | ** ** | **State of  Incorporation** |
|------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------|
|                                     |       |                        |
| Erickson’s  Diversified Corporation |       | Wisconsin                   |
|                                     |       |                        |
| GTL Truck Lines,  Inc.                   |       | Nebraska                    |
|                                     |       |                        |
| Hinky Dinky  Supermarkets, Inc.          |       | Nebraska                    |
|                                     |       |                        |
| Super Food  Services, Inc.               |       | Delaware                    |
|                                     |       |                        |
| T.J. Morris  Company                     |       | Georgia                     |
|                                     |       |                        |
| U-Save Foods,  Inc.                      |       | Nebraska                    |
|                                     |       |                        |
| NFCG, LLC                                |       | Delaware                    |

 

1

----
J.

at the sentencing hearing. 2 Appellant failed to demonstrate good cause because his claim that trial counsel was ineffective was itself procedurally barred. Hathaway v. State, 119 Nev. 248, 252-53, 71 P.3d 503, 506 (2003). Therefore, we conclude the district court did not err in denying appellant's petition, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.



# 11 ,A frea.4±, Hardesty

J.

2 We note that appellant's reliance on Martinez is misplaced for two reasons. First, Martinez provides good cause based on ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel for a federal court to consider claims that were procedurally defaulted in state court. This is appellant's first post-conviction petition; therefore, there is no claim of ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel. Second, we have recently held that Martinez does not apply to Nevada's statutory post-conviction procedures. See Brown v. McDaniel, Nev. , P.3d (Adv. Op. No. 60, August 7, 2014).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1947Acc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge Ralph Fuller Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 3
(0) 1947A .ze/w4
PRINCIPLES for Writing Conformance Requirements

General principles for creating conformance requirements: 

1. Do restrict each conformance requirement to one atomic, simple statement. 

• Address one feature at a time. 

• Keep each requirement as simple as possible. Multiple one-feature requirements 

will be easier to test (and trace back should a test fail) than one multi-part 

requirement. 

• Order features in a natural progression, beginning with easiest. This makes your 

document easier to read and later testing and trace-back more sensible (see next 

item). If an implementation can’t support an ‘easy’ requirement, then it is unlikely 

to support a more complex one. 

• Ensure traceability of requirements back to a specific part of the specification. 

Each requirement must be directly traceable to wording in the specification. Try 

to get as granular as possible, e.g., a specific statement rather than a section. 

 

2. Do make requirements technology neutral. 

3. Do Not change functionality of the specification. 

4. Do Not mix important terminologies. 

• Use a Glossary agreed upon by all. 

• Keep the balance of your text self-contained, with as few footnotes and external 

references as practical. 

• Choose either “shall” or “must” to signify requirement, use “should” for 

recommendation (but not requirement) and “may” for neutral choice. Don’t mix 

sets of terms that assign different interpretations to the same words. 

5. Do constrain optionality and cardinality. 

• Describe what features, values, attributes, etc. are to be measured and what the 

range indications are for success or failure. 

Example: ...occurs zero or more times 

 ...required when <Person> used 

6. Do indicate explicit dependencies and constraints. 

7. Do Not state how to test. 

8. Do Not rely upon formatting or context to convey intentions such as mandatory or 

optional. For example, instead of employing italic or bold face, use the English 

imperative “shall” or “must”, whichever is chosen as standard terminology. 

Example: Not “..this feature is required,” but rather, “..shall require feature 

A31.”
#### Peter Cochran, et al., *v.*J. H. Hays, et al.

Local Option Election — Contest of.

An election held in a given district to determine whether intoxicating liquors shall be sold therein cannot be contested under the provisions of the general election law.

Opening the Polls.

The Constitution provides that elections shall be held between 6 o’clock a. mi. and 7 o’clock p. m., but it does not follow tfiat the result is unlawful where the polls are not' opened until after six o’clock.

APPEAL FROM BULLITT CIRCUIT COURT.

October 11, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

One of fhe grounds specified in the notice to1 contest the election held in the Pine Tavern district in Bullitt county, to determine *504whether the sale of intoxicating liquors should be prohibited in said district, is that the judges at said election failed to open the polls at six o’clock A. m. The other is that there were fraudulent votes cast against said proposition. We are not aware of any law authorizing the contest of an election of this character, if, indeed, a mere test of the opinions or wishes of the qualified voters of a district on any given question can be called an election according to the statutory definition of the word.

*Strauss & Megler, for appellants. R. H.*Field, *for appellees.*

But besides that objection, appellants have failed to show any just grounds of complaint. They assume, as a matter of law, that the officers of an election are required to open the polls by six o’clock a. m., when the constitutional provision on the subject is that all elections by the people shall be held between the hours of six o’clock in the morning and seven o’clock in the evening. Sec. 16, Art. 8, Const, of Kentucky. The election complained of was commenced between six and seven o’clock in the morning, certainly, according to the evidence, not later than seven o’clock in the morning, and was continued until seven o’clock in the evening, which was a compliance with the law.

There is no evidence that there were fraudulent votes cast for or against the proposition.

The judgment must be *affirmed.*