73028 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 236 / Tuesday, December 9, 2014 / Notices 

1See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube 

From Mexico and the People’s Republic of China: 

Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value 

From Mexico, 75 FR 71070 (November 22, 2010) 

(Order). 

2The Department has previously treated GD 

Affiliates S. de R.L. de C.V. as part of a single entity 

including: (1) GD Copper Cooperatief U.A.; (2) Hong 

Kong GD Trading Co. Ltd.; (3) Golden Dragon 

Holding (Hong Kong) International, Ltd.; (4) GD 

Copper U.S.A. Inc.; (5) GD Affiliates Servicios S. de 

R.L. de C.V.; and (6) GD Affiliates S. de R.L. de C.V., 

which is collectively referred to as Golden Dragon. 

See, e.g., Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube 

From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

New Shipper Review, 77 FR 59178 (September 26, 

2012), and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

3See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, entitled ‘‘Seamless Refined Copper 

Pipe and Tube from Mexico: Decision 

Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012– 

2013’’ (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated 

concurrent with and adopted by this notice, for a 

complete description of the Scope of the Order. 

4On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (IA ACCESS) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

5See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

6See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

7See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

8See 19 CFR 351.303. 

9See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

10 Id. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–201–838] 

Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and 

Tube From Mexico: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on seamless 

refined copper pipe and tube from 

Mexico.1 The review covers two 

producers/exporters of the subject 

merchandise, GD Affiliates S. de R.L. de 

C.V. (Golden Dragon) 2 and Nacional de 

Cobre, S.A. de C.V. (Nacobre). The 

period of review (POR) is November 1, 

2012, through October 31, 2013. We 

have preliminarily found that sales of 

subject merchandise have been made at 

prices below normal value. Interested 

parties are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 9, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Eastwood or Dennis McClure, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office II, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3874 or (202) 482–5973, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is seamless refined copper pipe and 

tube. The product is currently classified 

under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

of the United States (HTSUS) 

subheadings 7411.10.1030 and 

7411.10.1090, and also may enter under 

HTSUS subheadings 7407.10.1500, 

7419.99.5050, 8415.90.8065, and 

8415.90.8085. The HTSUS subheadings 

are provided for convenience and 

customs purposes only; the written 

product description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive.3

Methodology 

The Department is conducting this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). Constructed export 

price is calculated in accordance with 

section 772 of the Act. Normal value is 

calculated in accordance with section 

773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum, dated 

concurrently with these results and 

hereby adopted by this notice. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS).4

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and it is 

available to all parties in the Central 

Records Unit, room 7046 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

The Department preliminarily 

determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist: 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

GD Affiliates S. de R.L. 

de C.V ......................... 1.23 

Nacional de Cobre, S.A. 

de C.V ......................... 0.00 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

The Department intends to disclose to 

interested parties the calculations 

performed in connection with these 

preliminary results within five days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice.5 Interested parties may submit 

case briefs to the Department no later 

than seven days after the date of the 

final verification report issued in this 

proceeding. Rebuttal briefs, limited to 

issues raised in the case briefs, may be 

filed no later than five days after the 

time limit for filing case briefs.6 Parties 

who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs 

in this proceeding are encouraged to 

submit with each argument: (1) A 

statement of the issue; (2) a brief 

summary of the argument; and (3) a 

table of authorities.7 Case and rebuttal 

briefs should be filed using ACCESS.8

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, or to participate if one is 

requested, must submit a written 

request to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, filed 

electronically via ACCESS. An 

electronically-filed document must be 

received successfully in its entirety by 

ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern Standard 

Time within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.9 Hearing 

requests should contain: (1) The party’s 

name, address, and telephone number; 

(2) the number of participants; and (3) 

a list of issues to be discussed. Issues 

raised in the hearing will be limited to 

issues raised in the briefs. If a request 

for a hearing is made, parties will be 

notified of the time and date for the 

hearing to be held at the U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue NW, 

Washington, DC 20230.10

The Department intends to issue the 

final results of this administrative 

review, including the results of its 

analysis of the issues raised in any 

written briefs, no later than 120 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 236 / Tuesday, December 9, 2014 / Notices 73029 

11See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

1See Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving and 

Racks From the People’s Republic of China: 

Countervailing Duty Order, 74 FR 46973 (September 

14, 2009) (CVD Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 79 

FR 44743 (August 1, 2014). 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h), 

unless this deadline is extended. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, the 

Department shall determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review.11 Golden Dragon and Nacobre 

reported the names of the importers of 

record and the entered value for all of 

their sales to the United States during 

the POR. If Golden Dragon’s and 

Nacobre’s weighted-average dumping 

margins are not zero or de minimis (i.e., 

less than 0.50 percent) in the final 

results of this review, we will calculate 

importer-specific assessment rates on 

the basis of the ratio of the total amount 

of dumping calculated for the importer’s 

examined sales and the total entered 

value of those sales in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), and we will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries covered 

by this review. Where either the 

respondent’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis, or an 

importer-specific assessment rate is zero 

or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. This clarification will 

apply to entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by Golden 

Dragon and Nacobre for which they did 

not know their merchandise was 

destined for the United States. In such 

instances, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. For a full discussion of 

this clarification, see Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

We intend to issue instructions to 

CBP 41 days after the publication date 

of the final results of this review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

notice of final results of administrative 

review for all shipments of seamless 

refined copper pipe and tube from 

Mexico entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication as provided by 

section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash 

deposit rates for Golden Dragon and 

Nacobre will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margins established in 

the final results of this administrative 

review; (2) for merchandise exported by 

manufacturers or exporters not covered 

in this review but covered in a prior 

segment of the proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently-completed segment; (3) if 

the exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

investigation but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recentlycompleted segment for the manufacturer 

of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 26.03 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the Order. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: December 2, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Discussion of the Methodology 

i. Normal Value Comparisons 

ii. Determination of Comparison Method 

iii. Product Comparisons 

iv. Date of Sale 

v. Constructed Export Price 

vi. Normal Value 

vii. Currency Conversion 

[FR Doc. 2014–28827 Filed 12–8–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–942] 

Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving 

and Racks From the People’s Republic 

of China: Final Results of Expedited 

Sunset Review of the Countervailing 

Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) finds that revocation 

of the countervailing duty order (CVD) 

order on certain kitchen appliance 

shelving and racks (kitchen racks) from 

the People’s Republic of China (PRC) 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of a countervailable 

subsidy at the levels indicated in the 

Final Results of Review section of this 

notice. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 9, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Kolberg, Office I, AD/CVD 

Operations, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1785. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Background 

On August 1, 2014, the Department 

initiated a sunset review of the CVD 

Order 1 on kitchen racks from the PRC 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On 

August 18, 2014, the Department 

received a notice of intent to participate 

in the review on behalf of Nashville 

Wire Products, Inc. (Nashville Wire) and 

SSW Holding Company, Inc. (SSW) 

(collectively, the domestic industry) 

within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i). Each of these 

companies claimed interested party 

status under section 771(9)(C) of the 

Act, as domestic producers of the 

domestic like product. 

The Department received adequate 

substantive responses collectively from 

the domestic industry within the 30-day 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did 

not receive a substantive response from 

the Government of the PRC or any 

respondent interested party to the 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES