alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. A G U STI N G U A D A LU PE GO NZALES - RODRI GU EZ , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 10233 D . C . N o . 4 : 0 9 - c r - 0 2 5 9 3 - J MR ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona J ohn M . R ol l , C hi e f

D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry15, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an d M . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A g u s tin G u a d a lu p e G o n z a le s - R o d r ig u e z ap p e a ls f r o m th e 3 7 - m o n th s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f

ol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on t o r e - e ntrya f t e rde port a t i on, 

# FI LED FEB 22 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 10233 2 i n vi ol a t i on of

8 U . S . C . § 1326. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291, a nd w e d i sm i ss. G onz a l e s - R odr i gue z c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d w he n i tappl i e d the 16 -l evel enhancem entpu rs uantt o U . S . S . G . § 2 L 1. 2(b)(1)(A )( i i ) a ft erfi nd i ng that hi s pr i orc onvi c t i on f

ors t a tut oryr ape w a s a“ c r i m e of vi ol e nc e . ” T he va l i d a nd e nf or c e abl e appe a l w a i ve rs e tf orth i n the pl e aa gr e e m e ntpr e c l ude s ourr e vi e w of th is is s u e . See U

ni ted Stat es v. B i bl er , 4 9 5 F .3 d 6 2 1 , 6 2 3 - 2 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) . W e th e r e f o r e e n f o r c e th e w a iv e ra n d d is m is s th e ap p e a l. DI S MI S S E D.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James Allen NUNLEY, Appellant.

No. 00-4076.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2001.

Decided May 29, 2001.

Before McMILLIAN and BEAM, Circuit Judges, and KYLE, District Judge.1

1

. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant James Allen Nunley appeals from a final judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas pursuant to Nunley’s conditional guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(A)(viii). Nunley was sentenced to 324 months’ imprisonment. He appeals from the district court’s2 denial of his motion to suppress evidence.

Having reviewed the matter, we conclude that the District Court did not err in denying Nunley’s suppression motion. We agree with the District Court that, although the officer’s affidavit and the resulting search warrant were not the “model of clarity or a paradigm to be copied by future law enforcement officers,” there was sufficient probable cause to issue the search warrant for Nunley’s home. We further agree that the location of the contraband was sufficiently described in both the affidavit and search warrant, and that the judicial officer was neutral and detached and used independent judgement in issuing the warrant. Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

2

. The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000065873
<NAME>                        ALLTEL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                              21,421
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      582,797
<ALLOWANCES>                                        18,439
<INVENTORY>                                         89,667
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   731,241
<PP&E>                                           4,841,827
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,869,075
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,073,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              569,284
<BONDS>                                          1,761,604
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                7,078
<PREFERRED>                                          9,241
<COMMON>                                           189,268
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,737,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,073,105
<SALES>                                            667,899
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,109,725
<CGS>                                              449,119
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,425,747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 145,428
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    571,806
<INCOME-TAX>                                       217,190
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                354,616
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       354,616
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1505 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1505

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
  To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States courts of 
  certain rights relating to certain marks, trade names, or commercial 
                                 names.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``No Stolen Trademarks Honored in 
America Act of 2023''.
SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF PROHIBITION.
    Section 211 of the Department of Commerce and Related Agencies 
Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained in section 101(b) of division A 
of Public Law 105-277; 112 Stat. 2681-88) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a)(2)--
            (A) by inserting ``or entity of the executive branch'' 
        after ``U.S. court'';
            (B) by striking ``by a designated national''; and
            (C) by inserting before the period ``that was used in 
        connection with a business or assets that were confiscated 
        unless the original owner of the mark, trade name, or 
        commercial name, or the bonafide successor-in-interest has 
        expressly consented'';
        (2) in subsection (b)--
            (A) by inserting ``or entity of the executive branch'' 
        after ``U.S. court''; and
            (B) by striking ``by a designated national or its 
        successor-in-interest'';
        (3) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e);
        (4) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
    ``(d) Subsections (a)(2) and (b) of this section shall apply only 
if the person or entity asserting the rights knew or had reason to know 
at the time when the person or entity acquired the rights asserted that 
the mark, trade name, or commercial name was the same as or 
substantially similar to a mark, trade name, or commercial name that 
was used in connection with a business or assets that were 
confiscated.''; and
        (5) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by striking ``In 
    this section:'' and all that follows through ``(2) The term'' and 
    inserting ``In this section, the term''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  553,975
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     59,139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               596,247
<PP&E>                                       1,951,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 215,385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             138,881,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,010,769
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       210,401
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  57,869,504
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               138,881,176
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               975,625
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  788,999
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             331,497
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                186,626
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            186,626
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   186,626
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .005
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .005


</TABLE>
**MP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 1 8 - 0621 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JAY DONALD WITKOWSKI,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee ’ s motion for a 30 -day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including Decem

ber 1 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court October 29 2020

10/29/2020
Case Number: DA 18-0621
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MONMOUTH CAPITAL CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         102,599
<SECURITIES>                                   356,789
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,009,546
<ALLOWANCES>                                    65,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,142,702
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,916,433
<PP&E>                                       1,324,942
<DEPRECIATION>                                 156,790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,760,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,333,299
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,513,891
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,834,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,760,765
<SALES>                                      5,396,530
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,965,265
<CGS>                                        4,442,148
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  955,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               649,905
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             130,706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (213,401)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (213,401)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (213,401)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.14)


</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

YOLANDO V. GREEN
, Appellant,

v.

SHARON FARMER
, Appellee.

No. 4D 22

- 2837

[ August 30, 2023 ]

Appeal from the C ircuit Court for the Ninet eenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie C ounty; Laurie E. Buchanan

, Judge; L.T. Case No.

562022DR001435

.

Christopher V. Butler of Butler Legal P.A., Sanford, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Yolando Green appeals the circuit court’s o rder g ranting i mmediate

e xclusive c ustody and c are of a m inor c hild to Sharon Farmer , the child’s maternal grandmother

. Because Farmer did not qualify under the statute for temporary custody, w e reverse the court ’s order and remand for entry of a dismissal without prejudice.

Chapter 751 , Florida Statutes (2022), allows extended family members to seek temporary custody of minors. The statute allows proceedings to be brought by “(a) [a]ny extended family member who has the signed,

notarized consent of the child ’ s legal parents; or (b) [a]ny extended family member who is caring full time for the child in the role of a substitute parent and with whom the child is presently living.” § 751.02(1)(a )

– ( b),

Fla. Stat. (2022).

Farmer filed a petition for temporary custody and was awarded temporary custody . But Farmer was not caring for the minor when she filed the petition. Nor did she have the consent of a parent of the minor. As a result, she did not qualify under the statute to receive temporary custody.2 We remand for dismissal without prejudice

, as we recognize proceedings pending when this appeal was filed may impact Farmer’s entitlement to proceed under the statute.

Reversed and remanded.

W ARNER
, D AMOOR GIAN and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 99-40932

_____________________

RICKY BERNARD MITCHELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MARSHALL CITY OF; CHARLES WILLIAMS,

Police Chief,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

(2:98-CV-114)

_________________________________________________________________

April 7, 2000

Before POLITZ, JOLLY, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In this Title VII case alleging various instances of racial

discrimination and hostile work environment, we have carefully

reviewed the record, studied the briefs, and considered the points

made by counsel at oral argument. Although the plaintiff argues

that the evidence in the record establishes the existence of

racially based disparate treatment, we cannot say that the district

court erred in concluding that the instances relied on by the

plaintiff were dissimilar, and thus constituted no probative
2

evidence demonstrating discrimination in this case. See Mayberry

v. Vought Aircraft Co., 55 F.3d 1086, 1089-90 (5th Cir. 1995).

Further, although there was evidence establishing that racial

epithets were uttered by employees of the Marshall City Police

Department at times relevant to this case, they do not appear to

have been directed at any employees of the police department, and

we cannot say that the conduct was so “severe or pervasive” as to

create a hostile work environment actionable under Title VII.

DeAngelis v. El Paso Municipal Police Officers Ass’n, 51 F.3d 591,

594 (5th Cir. 1995). 

We thus conclude that the judgment of the district court

dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint should be, and the same is 

A F F I R M E D.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

         CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP, INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (No. 333-92565) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-66025) of Nabisco, Inc. of
our report dated January 29, 2001, except as to Note 10 for which the date is
February 15, 2001, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the
financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2000,
which appears in this Form 10-K.

                                          /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Florham Park, New Jersey
March 16, 2001
Test Methods for Evaluating Aerial Drones

Safety | Capabilities | Proficiency

RobotTestMethods.nist.gov

Rectangular stickers for bulk printing. 

Please see associated round stickers for details and instructions.

1

1

3

3
Test Methods for Evaluating Aerial Drones

Safety | Capabilities | Proficiency

RobotTestMethods.nist.gov

Rectangular stickers for bulk printing. 

Please see associated round stickers for details and instructions.

2

2

4

4
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of The InterGroup Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John V. Winfield, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





·
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 5(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





·
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ John V. WinfieldJohn V. WinfieldPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date: September 21, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The InterGroup Corporation and will be retained by The InterGroup Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1419 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to issue a new rule removing the 

Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem population of grizzly bears from 

the Federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2023 

Mr. ROSENDALE (for himself, Mr. ZINKE, and Ms. HAGEMAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to issue a new rule 

removing the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem 

population of grizzly bears from the Federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Comprehensive Grizzly 

5 Bear Management Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1419 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF NORTHERN CONTINENTAL DIVIDE 

2 ECOSYSTEM POPULATION OF GRIZZLY BEARS 

3 FROM FEDERAL LIST OF ENDANGERED AND 

4 THREATENED WILDLIFE. 

5 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact6 ment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall issue 

7 a final rule removing the Northern Continental Divide 

8 Ecosystem population of grizzly bears from the Federal 

9 list of endangered and threatened wildlife without regard 

10 to any other provision of law that applies to the issuance 

11 of such rule. Such issuance and this section shall not be 

12 subject to judicial review. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 3.5

                 AMENDMENT TO RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION


[SEAL]                    MINNESOTA SECRETARY OF STATE
                     AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION


BEFORE COMPLETING THIS FORM, PLEASE READ INSTRUCTIONS LISTED BELOW.

CORPORATE NAME: (List the name of the company prior to any desired name change)

                              Modern Controls, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


This amendment is effective on the day it is filed with the Secretary of State,
unless you indicate another date, no later than 30 days after filing with the
Secretary of State. ____________________________





The following amendment(s) of articles regulating the above corporation were
adopted: (Insert full text of newly amended article(s) indicating which
article(s) is (are) being amended or added.) If the full text of the amendment
will not fit in the space provided, attach additional numbered pages. (Total
number of pages including this form _1_

                                 ARTICLE ___I___

RESOLVED, that Article I of the Company's Articles of Incorporation is amended
in its entirety to read as follows:

      The name of the corporation is MOCON, Inc.








This amendment has been approved pursuant to MINNESOTA STATUTES CHAPTER 302A OR
317A. I certify that I am authorized to execute this amendment and I further
certify that I understand that by signing this amendment, I am subject to the
penalties of perjury as set forth in section 609.48 as if I had signed this
amendment under oath.

                                     /s/ Ronald A. Meyer
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                     Ronald A. Meyer, Vice President Finance and
                                     Administration

                                          (Signature of Authorized Person)