alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11130.

#### COPELAND v. PYLES.

Decided March 18, 1920.

A recovery in trover by the plaintiff in this case as sole heir of her deceased husband was unauthorized, it appearing that the property in question was subject to administration for the purpose of paying indebtedness of the decedent.

Trover; from city court of Cairo — Judge Bigsby. November 24, 1919.

From the evidence it appeared that the bond for title to the deceased husband of the plaintiff, the value of which she sought to recover in this action, showed an agreement on his part to pay $1,500 for the land described therein, and that only $200 of this amount had been paid.

*Ledford &*Christopher, for plaintiff in error.

*J. Q. Smith,*contra.

Smith, J.

Mrs. Bosa Lee Pyles brought an action of trover against T. S. Copeland seeking to recover certain furniture and also a bond for title, all of which she alleged was in the possession of the' defendant. The petition alleged that the furniture and the bond for title had been the property of her deceased husband and that she, as the sole heir at law of her said deceased husband, was now the true owner of the property. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff $762, and upon the hearing of a motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds only, the court *96below passed an order granting a new trial unless the plaintiff would write off $262, the admitted value of the furniture. ■ The plaintiff wrote off this amount, and the motion for a new trial was then overruled. While a bond for title is personalty and trover will lie for the recovery thereof (see in this connnection *Coursey*v. Curtis, 18 *Ga.*237, 238; *Long*v. McIntosh, 129 *Ga.*661 (59 S. E. 779, 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1043, 12 Ann. Cas. 263); *Birmingham Fertilizer Co.*v. Cox, 10 *Ga. App.*699 (73 S. E. 1090); Civil Code (1910), § 3646; 38 Cyc. 2098), the evidence submitted on the trial of this case failed to show any title whatever in the plaintiff except a claim of title as the sole heir of her deceased husband; and since the title to personal property vests in the administrator of a deceased person for the purpose of paying debts and distribution, and not in the heir at law (Park’s Ann. Code, § 3929), and the case does not come within the statutory provisions which authorize a widow who is sole heir of her deceased husband to take possession of his estate without administration, "upon payment of his debts” (Park’s Ann. Code, § 3931, par. 1), the verdict was contrary to law, and the judgment of the court below overruling the motion for a new trial must be

*Reversed.*

Jenkins, P. *J., and*Stephens, *J., concur.*
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4730 

To maintain and expand the steel import licensing and monitoring program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2004 

Mr. ENGLISH (for himself and Mr. VISCLOSKY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To maintain and expand the steel import licensing and 

monitoring program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MAINTENANCE AND EXPANSION OF STEEL IM4 PORT LICENSING AND MONITORING PRO5 GRAM. 

6 (a) MAINTENANCE OF PROGRAM.—The steel import 

7 licensing and monitoring program established by the Sec8 retary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Commerce 

9 pursuant to the Memorandum signed by the President on 

10 March 5, 2002 (67 Fed. Reg. 10593 through 10597) (pur11 suant to the authority of the President under section 
2 

•HR 4730 IH 

1 203(g) of the Trade Act of 1974), shall, notwithstanding 

2 any other action taken by the President under section 203 

3 of the Trade Act of 1974 concerning the steel products 

4 described in the Memorandum, remain in effect and be 

5 established by the Secretary of Commerce as a permanent 

6 program. 

7 (b) EXPANSION OF PROGRAM.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out the program 

9 in accordance with subsection (a), the Secretary of 

10 the Treasury and the Secretary of Commerce shall 

11 expand the program to include all iron and steel, 

12 and all articles of iron or steel, described in para13 graph (2). The import and licensing data made 

14 available to the public as part of this program shall 

15 be released based upon classifications at the tenth 

16 digit level of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

17 United States. 

18 (2) IRON AND STEEL DESCRIBED.—The iron 

19 and steel, and articles of iron or steel, referred to in 

20 subparagraph (A) are the iron and steel, and articles 

21 of iron or steel, contained in the following headings 

22 and subheadings of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

23 of the United States: 

24 (A) Each of the headings 7206 through 

25 7229 (relating to mill products). 
3 

•HR 4730 IH 

1 (B) Each of the headings 7301 through 

2 7307 (relating to rails, structurals, pipe and 

3 tubes, and fittings and flanges). 

4 (C) Heading 7308 (relating to fabricated 

5 structurals). 

6 (D) Subheading 7310.10.00 (relating to 

7 barrels and drums). 

8 (E) Heading 7312 (relating to strand and 

9 rope). 

10 (F) Heading 7313.00.00 (relating to 

11 barbed and fence wire). 

12 (G) Headings 7314, 7315, and 7317.00 

13 (relating to fabricated wire). 

14 (H) Heading 7318 (relating to industrial 

15 fasteners). 

16 (I) Heading 7326 (relating to fence posts). 

17 (c) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of the 

18 Treasury and the Secretary of Commerce are hereby au19 thorized and directed to take such actions as are nec20 essary— 

21 (1) to maintain the program described in sub22 section (a) in accordance with such subsection; and 

23 (2) to expand, as necessary and appropriate, 

24 such program in accordance with subsection (b). 

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.01

                                                     Commission File No. 1-05492



                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

Know All Men By These Presents, that each person whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints John L. Patenaude and Robert S. Amrein and each of
them, as true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, to sign Nashua Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      Signature                         Title             Date
      ---------                         -----             ----
<S>                                     <C>               <C>
/s/ Avrum Gray                          Director          March 5, 2004
---------------------------------
          Avrum Gray

 /s/ Mark E. Schwarz                    Director          March 4, 2004
---------------------------------
         Mark E. Schwarz

 /s/ L. Scott Barnard                   Director          March 4, 2004
---------------------------------
        L. Scott Barnard

/s/ George R. Mrkonic, Jr.              Director          March 3, 2004
---------------------------------
     George R. Mrkonic, Jr.


 /s/ James F. Orr III                   Director          March 3, 2004
---------------------------------
       James F. Orr III
</TABLE>
Order entered August 20, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00866-CV

MICHAEL WIERSCHEM, M.D., Appellant

V.

WILLIAM BOURGEOIS AND CAROLYN BOURGEOIS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-02281-2018

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s August 19, 2019 unopposed motion for an extension of 

time to file his brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to September 3, 

2019.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended
September 30, 2004 (the "Report") of FMS Financial  Corporation  (the "Company")
as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission,  we,  Craig W.  Yates,
President and Chief Executive Officer, and Channing L. Smith, Vice President and
Chief  Financial  Officer,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350,  as
adopted, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                       <C>

/s/ Craig W. Yates                          /s/ Channing L. Smith
-------------------------------------       ------------------------------------------
Craig W. Yates                              Channing L. Smith
President and Chief Executive Officer       Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)               (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


Date: November 10, 2004                     Date: November 10, 2004

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10(i)

            [Letterhead of Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen LLP]



Albert C. Braslow
Direct Dial:  (215) 977-2030
Direct Fax:   (215) 405-2930
E-Mail:  abraslow@wolfblock.com



                                October 4, 2000

VIA TELECOPY AND
FIRST-CLASS MAIL

Rick Bailey, President
Gateway Distributors, Ltd.
d/b/a The Right Solution
500 East Cheyenne Avenue
North Las Vegas, NV  89030

        RE:  Koken, Insurance Commissioner v. Jutland Enterprises, Inc.
             Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, No. 294 M.D. 1994
             Maleski, Insurance Commissioner v. Jutalnd Enterprises, Inc.
             New Jersey Superior Court, No. SOM-L-871-95

Dear Mr. Bailey:

     This is to  confirm  that our  client  has  agreed to cause  the  above-two
captioned  judgments ("the Judgements") to be satisfied upon the following terms
and conditions:

          1.   On or  before  October  11,  2000,  you shall  provide  me with a
               payment in the amount of $5,000;

          2.   On or before  November  10,  2000,  you shall  provide  me with a
               payment in the amount of $5,000;

          3.   On or before  December  31,  2000,  you shall  provide  me with a
               payment in the amount of $40,000;

          4.   All  payments  shall  be  made  by  certified  check  payable  to
               Statutory  Liquidator  of Corporate  Life  Insurance  Company and
               shall be mailed or delivered to me;

          5.   Upon  timely receipt of all required payments as set forth above,
               our client shall cause the Judgments to be satisfied;

<PAGE>



          6.   In the event that any payment is not  received by me on or before
               the  date  it is  due  (with  time  being  of the  essence),  the
               Judgments  shall not be  satisfied,  and our  client shall retain
               all monies paid pursuant to this agreement.

        Please  signify  your  agreement  with the above terms and conditions by
signing and faxing back to me the enclosed copy of this letter.


                                                Very truly yours,


                                                /s/ Albert C. Braslow
                                                Albert C. Braslow
                                     For Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen LLP

ACB:jc


AGREED AS ABOVE:

GATEWAY DISTRIBUTORS, LTD.
d/b/a THE RIGHT SOLUTION

By:  /s/ Rick Bailey
    -----------------
     Rick Bailey, President





















                                        7
# 

# BILL OF COSTS

## TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, TENTH DISTRICT, AT WACO

No. 10-14-00273-CV

**Charles C. Taylor, Jr.**

**v.**

**Bradley M. Livingston, et al**

(No. 26905 IN 278th District Court OF Walker COUNTY)

**Balance of costs owing to the Tenth Court of Appeals, Waco, Texas:  0.00**

***Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.***

I, **SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK** OF THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

**IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,**witness my hand and the Seal of the **COURT OF APPEALS**for the Tenth District of Texas, this February 13, 2015.

SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK

By:___________________________

Nell Hegefeld, Deputy Clerk
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4738 

To provide that a resident of a public housing project who performs community service shall receive priority consideration for participation in economic self-sufficiency programs sponsored by a public housing agency, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2004 

Mr. MEEKS of New York (for himself, Mr. ISRAEL, Ms. LEE, Mr. TOWNS, 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, 

Mr. NADLER, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. OWENS, Mr. CROWLEY, Mrs. MALONEY, 

Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, and Mr. SERRANO) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To provide that a resident of a public housing project who 

performs community service shall receive priority consideration for participation in economic self-sufficiency programs sponsored by a public housing agency, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Housing Com5 munity Service Incentive Act’’. 
2 

•HR 4738 IH 

1 SEC. 2. COMMUNITY SERVICE. 

2 (a) COMMUNITY SERVICE.—Section 12 of the United 

3 States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437j) is amended 

4 by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following new 

5 subsection: 

6 ‘‘(c) COMMUNITY SERVICE.— 

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Each adult resident of a 

8 public housing project who performs 8 hours per 

9 month of community service (not including political 

10 activities) within the community in which that adult 

11 resides shall receive priority consideration for par12 ticipation in any economic self-sufficiency programs 

13 sponsored by the public housing agency that admin14 isters the public housing project in which the adult 

15 resides. 

16 ‘‘(2) GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION.—Community 

17 service at a location not owned by the public housing 

18 agency shall qualify as community service for pur19 poses of paragraph (1).’’. 

Æ
June 12, 2023

COMMENTS ON NIST CYBERSECURITY
FRAMEWORK 2.0 CORE DRAFT

SUBMITTED To: SUBMITTED By:
National Institute of Science and Technology Peraton Inc.

Scott Cooper, VP of Strategic Advocacy


Peraton Comments on NIST CSF 2.0 Core Draft

Peraton

Thank you for the continued work to update the Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Peraton is excited
to provide written feedback on the CSF 2.0 Core Draft after participating in the NIST’s CSF 2.0
in-person workshop at the National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE) in Rockville,
MD. Listed below are comments across key sections of the draft for your consideration. Please
do not hesitate to contact us if further discussion is warranted, we are happy to continue
partnering with NIST in this effort.

PERATON COMMENTS ON NIST CSF 2.0 CORE DRAFT

NIST CYBERSECURITY
FRAMEWORK 2.0 CORE
DRAFT SECTIONS

PERATON SUGGESTIONS

DISCUSSION

All six Core Functions

Incorporate an Operational
Technology (OT) cybersecurity
category or subcategory across each
of the six Core Functions to ensure
OT issues are reflected throughout the
framework.

With the heightened concern around
the United States’ Critical
Infrastructure cyber vulnerabilities,
OT is noticeably absent from the CSF
2.0 Core Draft. While NIST solicited
comments on the Draft Guide to OT
Security, the two documents should
not live separately. Rather, the CSF
2.0 Core Draft should incorporate key
takeaways from the Guide to OT
Security throughout each of the six
Core Functions.

All six Core Functions

Incorporate the expanded use of
Cloud Native cybersecurity
capabilities across all six CSF Core
Functions

The CSF 2.0 Core Draft makes no
mention of Cloud Capabilities in the
document. While the IDENTIFY
function contains a “Platform
Security” category, there is no
connected “Infrastructure Security”
that encapsulates Cloud Native
capabilities.

Protect (PR)

Add a new category under the Protect
function “Zero Trust Architecture
(ZTA).”

Zero Trust is becoming the standard
across government and industry.
Following CISA’s “Secure by desi
secure by default” concept paper.
important to reiterate the need for
ZTA throughout government and
industry based on NIST Special
Publication 800-207, or other NIST
research.

Protect (PR)

Add a new category under the Protect
function “Cyber Threat Intelligence
(cTD,”

Users should have plans in place for
what to do with the immense amounts
of cyber threat data collected through
enhanced cybersecurity and threat
monitoring. The CSF 2.0 Core Draft
should provide simple outline and
examples of the intelligence cycle as
it pertains to CTI.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Empire Gold
Inc.'s Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2000 and Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Deficit for the year ended December 31, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                          26,743
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   98,543
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,286
<PP&E>                                         489,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 614,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          366,449
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    48,405,267
<OTHER-SE>                                (48,156,894)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   614,822
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   423
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (75,611)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (75,611)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (75,611)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (75,611)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1514 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the rate of the special 

pension payable to Medal of Honor recipients, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2023 

Mr. NEHLS (for himself and Mr. PAPPAS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

rate of the special pension payable to Medal of Honor 

recipients, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medal of Honor Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

6 Congress finds the following: 

7 (1) The Medal of Honor is the highest and 

8 most prestigious military decoration of the United 

9 States. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1514 IH

1 (2) To earn the Medal of Honor ‘‘the deed of 

2 the person . . . must be so outstanding that it clear3 ly distinguishes his gallantry beyond the call of duty 

4 from lesser forms of bravery’’. 

5 (3) The actions of Medal of Honor recipients 

6 inspire bravery, and the willingness to give all, in 

7 those who serve in the Armed Forces and those who 

8 will serve in the future. 

9 (4) Those listed on the Medal of Honor Roll ex10 emplify the best traits of members of the Armed 

11 Forces, a long and proud lineage of those who went 

12 beyond the call of duty. 

13 (5) Pursuant to section 1562 of title 38, United 

14 States Code, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 

15 pay monthly to each living person whose name has 

16 been entered on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and 

17 Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll a special pension. 

18 (6) Recipients of the Medal of Honor have 

19 earned a substantial and historic increase to such 

20 special pension in recognition of their conspicuous 

21 gallantry, unwavering commitment, and heroic ac22 tions above and beyond the call of duty. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1514 IH

1 SEC. 3. INCREASE IN DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

2 SPECIAL PENSION PAYABLE TO MEDAL OF 

3 HONOR RECIPIENTS. 

4 (a) INCREASE IN SPECIAL PENSION PAYABLE TO

5 LIVING MEDAL OF HONOR RECIPIENTS.—Section 

6 1562(a)(1) of title 38, United States Code, is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘$1,388.68’’ and inserting ‘‘$8,333.33’’. 

8 (b) AMOUNT OF SPECIAL PENSION PAYABLE TO

9 SURVIVING SPOUSES.—Section 1562(a)(2)(A) of title 38, 

10 United States Code, is amended— 

11 (1) by striking ‘‘special pension under this sec12 tion’’ and inserting ‘‘monthly’’; and 

13 (2) by striking the period and adding at the end 

14 the following: ‘‘a special pension under this section 

15 at the rate of $1,489.73, as adjusted from time to 

16 time under subsection (e).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS