alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 4.1




[FACE OF CERTIFICATE]

Number

SP

COMMON STOCK

[LOGO]

SOMAXON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Shares

SEE REVERSE FOR STATEMENTS RELATING TO RIGHTS, PREFERENCES, PRIVILEGES AND
RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY

CUSIP 834453 10 2

THIS CERTIFIES THAT

is the record holder of

FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $.0001 PAR VALUE PER
SHARE, OF

SOMAXON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or
by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by
the Transfer Agent and Registrar.

WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of
its duly authorized officers.

Dated:

/sig/

VICE PRESIDENT & CFO

[SEAL]

/sig/

PRESIDENT & CEO

COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:

AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

BY

AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE


[REVERSE OF CERTIFICATE]

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:

TEN COM - as tenants in common

TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties

JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in
common

UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - .....(Cust)..... Custodian .....(Minor)..... under
Uniform Gifts to Minors Act .....(State).....

UNIF TRF MIN ACT - .....(Cust)..... Custodian (until age .....)
......(Minor)..... under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act .....(State).....

Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)

Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do
hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint

Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation
with full power of substitution in the premises.
<PAGE>
Dated

X

X

NOTICE:

THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN
UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR
ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.

Signature(s) Guaranteed

By

THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS,
STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN
AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE
17Ad-15.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          12,460
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                       250
<INVENTORY>                                     25,839
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,697
<PP&E>                                          41,333
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,415
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        98,697
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,538
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,420
<SALES>                                         63,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,407
<CGS>                                           39,877
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   191
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,610
<INCOME-TAX>                                       621
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                989
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       989
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
IB 

Union Calendar No. 416 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4688 

[Report No. 108–677] 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 

Chesapeake Bay Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2004 

Mr. GILCHREST (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. SCHROCK, Mr. 

CARDIN, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. 

CASTLE, Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. PLATTS, 

Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. WYNN, Mr. MURTHA, Mr. HOYER, 

and Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2004 

Additional sponsor: Mr. MORAN of Virginia 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2004 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to 

reauthorize the Chesapeake Bay Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4688 RH 

1 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF CHESAPEAKE BAY PRO2 GRAM. 

3 Section 117(j) of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

4 Act (33 U.S.C. 1267(j)) is amended by striking ‘‘2005’’ 

5 and inserting ‘‘2010’’. 

Union Calendar No. 416 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4688 

[Report No. 108–677] 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 

to reauthorize the Chesapeake Bay Program. 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2004 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
PARTISAN TICKET
SAMPLE BALLOT
GENERAL ELECTION

NOVEMBER 3, 1998
See SSS
RRR

CONGRESSIONAL TICKET
SSS

FOR REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS
FIRST DISTRICT

Vote for ONE
Don Eret Democrat
Doug Bereuter Republican

et

FOR REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS
SECOND DISTRICT

Vote for ONE
Michael Scott Democrat
Lee Terry Republican

eee

FOR REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS
THIRD DISTRICT

Vote for ONE
Bill Barrett Republican
Jerry Hickman Libertarian
STATE TICKET
FOR GOVERNOR
Vote for ONE
Bill Hoppner
Governor
Democrat

Pam Bataillon
Lieutenant Governor

Mike Johanns
Governor

Republican
Dave Maurstad
Lieutenant Governor

FOR SECRETARY OF STATE
Vote for ONE

Kent Bernbeck Democrat
Scott Moore Republican
Michaelle Miller Libertarian

eee

FOR AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
Vote for ONE

Kandra Hahn Democrat
Kate Witek Republican
Gus Lieske Reform

mS oer

FOR STATE TREASURER
Vote for ONE
David D. Tagart Democrat
David Heineman Republican
Sam Spilker | Reform

———— SSS oe

FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vote for ONE
Pat Knapp Democrat

Don Stenberg

Republican

Andrew L. Sullivan Libertarian

——E—_——— oe

FOR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER
FOURTH DISTRICT
Vote for ONE

Rod Johnson Republican

—_—————~———£E£{£{_>_SanaD=>EOaaoos oor

FOR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER
FIFTH DISTRICT
Vote for ONE

Daniel G. Urwiller Republican
Exhibit 23.1  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm  The Board of Directors MOCON, Inc.:  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-58789,
333-90116 and 333-134413) on Form S-8 of MOCON, Inc. and subsidiaries
of our report dated March 30, 2010, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of MOCON, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders
equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows and the related financial
statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2009, which report appears in the December 31, 2009, annual report on Form 10-K
of MOCON, Inc. and subsidiaries.   /s/ KPMG LLP   Minneapolis, Minnesota March 30,
2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          79,905
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  173,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     73,535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               326,609
<PP&E>                                       5,208,911
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,345,846
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,672,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,811,957
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,980,107
<COMMON>                                         7,244
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,672,108
<SALES>                                      2,320,122
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,320,122
<CGS>                                          673,674
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  737,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,288,872
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             197,840
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (577,418)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (577,418)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (577,418)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ISABELL HAYWARD, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CA 09-0453-C

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, :

Commissioner of Social Security,

:

Defendant.

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on this

date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff be

awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $2,660.73 under the Equal Access to

Justice Act, representing compensation for 15.5 hours of service by Gilbert B.

Laden, Esquire, at the cost-of-living-adjusted rate of $171.66 per hour, and

court costs of $350.00; the total EAJA award due and owing plaintiff is

$3,010.73. The filing fee portion of the EAJA award is to be reimbursed from

the Judgment Fund administered by the United States Department of Treasury.

DONE this the 22nd day of February, 2010.

 s/WILLIAM E. CASSADY 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00453-C Document 22 Filed 02/22/10 Page 1 of 1
11180.

#### Peeples *v.*Aultman.

Stephens, J.

1. Where a plaintiff fails to prove his case as laid, a nonsuit is proper.

2. Where a plaintiff declared upon an alleged contract between him and the defendant wherein it was agreed that the plaintiff should as a real-estate broker sell for the defendant, for a specified commission, certain lands, and where the plaintiff’s evidence upon the trial showed that prior to any performance of the contract sued upon the plaintiff entered into a partnership in the real-estate business with another, and after such partnership had been formed the partner entered into negotiations with the defendant and obtained a modification of the terms of the original agreement made between the plaintiff and the defendant relative to-the sale of the land, there was shown no right in *610the plaintiff to recover under the alleged contract declared upon, and a nonsuit was proper.

Decided August 13, 1920.

Complaint; from city court of Tifton — Judge Price. November 14, 1919.

J. E. Peeples sued for certain commissions -alleged to be due him as a real-estate broker, upon the sale of certain lands of the defendant. From the evidence at the trial it appeared that early in the year 1919 the defendant listed with the plaintiff certain lands for sale 'at $45 per acre, and agreed to pay him a commission of 5% on the sale. In June or July, 1919, the plaintiff formed a partnership with J. M. Peeples, under the firm name of J. E. Peeples & Son, and subsequently and before performance of the alleged contract J. M. Peeples entered into negotiations with the defendant which resulted in an agreement by the defendant to accept $40 per acre for his lands, and to pay a commission of 5%. The .property was afterwards sold upon this basis, the defendant refused to pay the commission agreed upon, and J. E. Peeples brought this suit. The trial judge granted a nonsuit, upon the ground that “the evidence showed that the cause of action, if any, was in the partnership composed of J. E. Peeples and J. M. Peeples, and not in the plaintiff.”

*Fulwood & Hargrett,*for plaintiff.

*Ridgdill & Mitchell, R. D. Smith,*for defendant.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*
H. R. 4827

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To amend the Colorado Canyons National Conservation Area and Black Ridge

Canyons Wilderness Act of 2000 to rename the Colorado Canyons National Conservation Area as the McInnis Canyons National Conservation Area.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MCINNIS CANYONS NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA.

(a) PURPOSE.—The Colorado Canyons National Conservation

Area and Black Ridge Canyons Wilderness Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C.

460mmm et seq.) is amended in section 2(b) by striking ‘‘Colorado

Canyons’’ and inserting ‘‘McInnis Canyons’’.

(b) DEFINITIONS.—Section 3 of such Act is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Colorado’’ and inserting

‘‘McInnis’’; and

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘Colorado’’ and inserting

‘‘McInnis’’.

(c) COLORADO CANYONS NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA.—Section 4 of such Act is amended—

(1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘COLORADO’’ and inserting

‘‘MCINNIS’’; and

(2) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Colorado Canyons’’ and

inserting ‘‘McInnis Canyons’’.

(d) ADVISORY COUNCIL.—Section 8(a) of such Act is amended

by striking ‘‘Colorado Canyons’’ and inserting ‘‘McInnis Canyons’’.

(e) SHORT TITLE.—Section 1 of such Act is amended by striking

‘‘Colorado’’ and inserting ‘‘McInnis’’.

(f) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the ‘‘Colorado

Canyons National Conservation Area’’ shall be deemed to be a

reference to the ‘‘McInnis Canyons National Conservation Area’’.

(g) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section and the amendments made

by this section take effect on January 1, 2005.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Code of Ethics Page 1 of 1 Adopted 05/16/13

Code of Ethics

Individuals practicing in the field of Firearm and Toolmark Identification will be guided by

those practices and procedures which are generally recognized within the discipline to be

consistent with a high level of professionalism. In the absence of specific practices or

procedures, the principal spirit and intent of this code should be met.

 Refrain from personal or professional conduct which is not in the best interest of the

profession.

 Provide a complete and accurate representation of the education, training,

experience, or areas of expertise.

 Treat evidence with the care and control necessary to ensure its integrity.

 Ensure that all analytical methods and procedures used are appropriate, accurate,

reliable, and accepted by the relevant scientific community.

 Refrain from knowingly misrepresenting data upon which expert opinion or

conclusion is based.

 Reporting of results, conclusions and opinions must be supported by sufficiently

detailed records to allow meaningful review and assessment by an independent

person competent in the field.

 Testify in an impartial manner to promote the understanding of the results,

conclusions and opinions.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOE HENRY SCOTT, III, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0760-CG-C

WILLIAM BOGGAN, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the

issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this

Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby dismissed without prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED this 26th day of May, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00760-CG-C Document 12 Filed 05/26/10 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 11


                           UtiliCorp United Inc.
          Statement regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings



<TABLE>
                                                                    For the Year Ended
                                                                        December 31,
Line No.                                                          1996       1995      1994
-------                                                           ----------------------------
<S>       <C>                                                     <C>        <C>       <C>

          Earnings Available for Common Shares:
(a)       Earnings available for common shares as reported         $103.7    $77.7      $91.4
(b)       Elimination of interest on convertible
            subordinated debenture, net of tax                        .32      .22        .55
(c)       Elimination of dividends on cumulative 
            convertible preference stock                             --        --         .93
                                                                  ----------------------------
(d)       Fully Diluted Earnings Available                         $104.0    $77.9      $92.9
                                                                  ----------------------------
                                                                  ----------------------------


          Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
(e)       Primary weighted average shares outstanding
            as reported                                             47.21    45.08       43.97
(f)       Assumed conversion of convertible subordinated
            debenture                                                 .32      .39         .55
(g)       Assumed conversion of cumulative convertible
            preference shares                                        --        --          .66
                                                                  ----------------------------
(h)       Fully Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding         47.53    45.47       45.18
                                                                  ----------------------------
                                                                  ----------------------------
          Earnings Per Common Share:
              Primary (a/e)                                         $2.20     $1.72      $2.08
              Fully Diluted (d/h)                                    2.19      1.71       2.06

</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RODNEY MALONE

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 2831

LT Case No. 2022

- 100025

- CFDL

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. ________________________________/

Opinion file d June 16, 20 23

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County

, Dawn D. Nichols , Judge.

O.H. Eaton, Jr., Assistant Regional

Counsel of Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel

, Casselberry, for Appell ant

.

Rodney Malone, Brooksville, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen R. Putnam, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

.2

In this Anders 1 appeal, we affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence

with one exception. The trial court erred in assessing the sheriff’s $100.00

investigative cost under section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes (2021), because

the State did not request such a cost

. See Chivese v. State , 331 So. 3d 264,

2 65 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (citing Richards v. State , 288 So. 3d 574, 57 5

– 76

(Fla. 2020) ( requir ing specific request by State for award of investigative

costs ). We remand for the trial court to enter an amended judgment

removing the $100.00 investigative cost. In all other respects, we affirm.

AFF IRM ED ; REMANDED with directions.

EISNAUGLE

, MAKAR and KILBANE , JJ., concur.

1 Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ARTHUR LEE MACK, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. CA 04-0813-BH-C

:

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security, :

Defendant.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to

the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to

which objection is made, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated August 12, 2005, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this

Court.

DONE this 28th day of November, 2005.

 

s/ W. B. Hand

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-00813-BH-C Document 20 Filed 11/28/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2
 MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
  The undersigned, Susan E. Knight, the Chief Financial Officer of MTS Systems Corporation (the "Company"), has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2011 (the "Report").
  The undersigned hereby certifies that:
  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
  Date: November 29, 2011/s/ Susan E. KnightSusan E. KnightSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT E. TODD, :

 :

Plaintiff, :

 :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0318-M

 :

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, :

Commissioner of :

Social Security, :

 :

Defendant. :

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff’s

Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice

Act be and is hereby GRANTED and that Plaintiff’s counsel, Byron

A. Lassiter, be AWARDED an EAJA attorney's fee in the amount of

$3,548.39.

DONE this 1st day of March, 2010.

s/BERT W. MILLING, JR. 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00318-M Document 22 Filed 03/01/10 Page 1 of 1