alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29039]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-14-042]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: December 17, 2014 at 11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Agendas for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701-TA-451 and 731-TA-1126-1127 (Review) 
(Lightweight Thermal Paper from China and Germany). The Commission is 
currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views 
of the Commission on January 16, 2015.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission:

    Issued: December 5, 2014.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-29039 Filed 12-8-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LEO LAMONICA FLEETON, : 

Petitioner, : 

v. : CIVIL ACTION 04-0810-BH-M 

STEPHEN BULLARD, : 

Respondent. : 

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this

file, and a de novo determination of those portions of the

Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of

the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is

adopted as the opinion of this Court. 

It is ORDERED that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE so that Petitioner may pursue unexhausted claims in

the State Courts.

DONE this 26th day of September, 2005.

 

 W. B. HAND

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-00810-BH-M Document 17 Filed 09/26/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23
 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 The Board of Directors
 MTS Systems Corporation:
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-82582, 333-136113, 333-172136 and 333-172137) on Form S-8 of MTS Systems Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated November 29, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of MTS Systems Corporation and subsidiaries as of October 1, 2011 and October 2, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ investment and comprehensive income, and cash flows and the related financial statement schedule II for each of the years in the three-year period ended October 1, 2011, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of October 1, 2011, which report appears in the October 1, 2011 annual report on Form 10-K of MTS Systems Corporation and subsidiaries.
 
 /s/ KPMG LLP
 
 Minneapolis, Minnesota
 November 29, 2011
Exhibit 32


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Imagenetix, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), We, William P. Spencer, CEO, President and
director and Debra L. Spencer, Secretary/Treasurer and director of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Registrant.


Dated: 2/22/2005                      /s/William P. Spencer
      ----------                      ---------------------------
                                      William P. Spencer
                                      CEO, President and director



Dated: 2/22/2005                      /s/Debra L. Spencer
      ----------                      ---------------------------
                                      Debra L. Spencer
                                      Secretary/Treasurer and director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from consolidated
financial statements found on the Annual Report on Form 10-K, December 31, 1998,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                          667
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                12,253
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     75
<INVENTORY>                                                  18,861
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             35,608
<PP&E>                                                       14,834
<DEPRECIATION>                                                6,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               46,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        13,932
<BONDS>                                                      12,162
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                        104
<OTHER-SE>                                                   20,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 46,875
<SALES>                                                      55,774
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             55,774
<CGS>                                                        38,482
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                38,482
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            1,185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               2,507
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    775
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           1,732
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  1,732
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0.17
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-41435 Summary Calendar
VINCENT LILLY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CHUCK BISCOE Etc. ET AL., Defendants, CHUCK BISCOE, Assistant Warden, Beto I; DANNY HORTON, Assistant Warden, Beto I; BOBBY WARREN, Assistant Regional Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division; M. TIMMONS, Classification Case Manager, Beto I, Defendants-Appellees.

____________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:00-CV-215

____________________________________________

July 31, 2001 Before POLITZ, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Vincent Lilly, Texas prisoner #467486, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C.1 Wilson v. Budney , 976 F.2d 957 (5th Cir. 1992).

2 Farmer v. Brennan , 511 U.S. 825 (1994).

3 Simmons v. Poppell , 837 F.2d 1243 (5th Cir. 1988) (citing Daniels v. Williams , 474 U.S. 327 (1986), and Hudson v. Palmer , 468 U.S. 517 (1984)).

4 Martin v. Dallas County , 822 F.2d 553 (5th Cir. 1987). 2 § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) & (ii). He contends that his due process rights were violated when he was not given the opportunity to be present at his custody reclassification hearing. He missed three scheduled hearings; the first two were continued because of his absence. A prison inmate does not have a protectable liberty or property interest in custodial classification hearings. 1 Lilly therefore has not and cannot state a cognizable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on this basis. Lilly invokes the eighth amendment and contends that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his personal property because his return to medium custody allegedly resulted in the theft of his cell contents by prison gang members. Unfortunately for Lilly, he has not and cannot state a claim under the eighth amendment for deliberate indifference to the security of his property. 2 In addition, his claim fails because "[t]he Due Process Clause is not implicated by a state official's negligent act causing unintended loss of property, . . . and even intentional destruction of an inmate's property does not raise a constitutional claim if an adequate post-deprivation remedy exists." 3 Texas provides adequate postdeprivation remedies. 4 This claim also is not cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.3

This appeal is frivolous and accordingly it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2
**Exhibit 13.13**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Inmarsat Launch Company Limited (the“Company”) for the annual period ended 31 December 2006 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Andrew Sukawaty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in thePeriodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Date: 29 April 2008
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James W. Bernau, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such 10-QSB/A fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Willamette Valley Vineyards
Inc.

Date: December 6, 2004
By:	 /s/ James W. Bernau
Name: James W. Bernau
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
#### W. F. Mullins et al. *v.*Tilley Emerson.

Judgment — Setting Aside — Abated Action.

Under § 579, subsec. 6, Civ. Code, relating' to vacation of final judgments because of the death of one of the parties before judgment in the action, where the death of a party before judgment is alleged, and not controverted by the answer, and revivor is not shown, the judgment should be set aside.

Abatement and Revival — Necessity of Revivor — Consolidation'of Action.

Where an action has abated by the death of a party, and judgment was rendered in the case without revivor, revivor is not dispensed with by consolidating the abated action with an action by the personal representatives of the deceased against the heirs for settlement of the estate.

APPEAL PROM CLARK CIRCUIT COURT.

April 1, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Petees :

In the action of *Tilley Emerson et al. v. Gordon C. Mullins et al., the defendant,' Mullins, was dead before the judgment was *643rendered in the case for the sale of the land; and there never had been a revivor of the action against appellants, who are his' heirs, he having died intestate, nor against his personal representative.

*Breckenridge &*Buckner, *for appellants.*

*C. Eginton, Simpson, for appellee.*

By Sec. 579, Civil Code, the court in which a judgment or final order has been rendered or made, has the power, after the expiration of the term;, to vacate or modify such judgment or order, for certain causes enumerated in the sub-sections thereto subjoined; and the sixth provides that the judgment or final order may be vacated for the death of one of the parties 'before the judgment in the action.

At the time the action was submitted, and when the judgment was rendered for the sale of the land, Mullins was dead. Properly there was no suit in court, there never having been a revivor; and any judgment affecting the rights of his heirs, or representatives, it would seem, would be void, but bh that as it may, the court rendering the judgment upon the facts set forth in the petition, un-controverted by the answer, should have set aside the judgment. Nor did the fact, that the suit of Emerson, etc., against Mullins was consolidated with a suit brought by the personal representative of Mullins against his heirs for the settlement of his estate, dispense with the necessity of reviving the first named suit. The defendants in the last named suit, were not defendants in the former suit; indeed, the order for the consolidation was a mere nullity, for there was, in fact, no suit in court to be consolidated with it.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to render judgment in conformity hereto, and for further proceedings consistent herewith.
11149.

#### Central of Georgia Railway Co. *v.*Clements.

Stephens, J.

1. Where the petition alleges a cause of action for damages arising from the maintenance and continuance of a nuisance which is not of a permanent character and which may be abated, and prays for damages on account of the diminished market value of the freehold, and the measure of damages is not excepted to by demurrer, and evidence in support of the same is admitted without objection, the defendant cannot complain of a charge of the court instructing the jury that the plaintiff’s measure of damages for the maintenance and *625continuance of tlie nuisance is the diminution in the market value of the property injured.

Decided August 16, 1920.

Action for damages; from Polk superior court—-Judge Irwin. November 15, 1919.

*J. Branham, Maddox & Doyal, W. K. Fielder,*for plaintiff in error.

*John K. Davis, Mundy & Watkins,*contra.

2. ’ The charge of the court confined the plaintiff’s right to recover to damages on account of the maintenance and continuation of the nuisance for four years prior to the filing of the suit, and fully and fairly submitted all the issues to the jury, and is not subject to any of the objections urged. In the absence of any request to charge, the defendant cannot complain that his theory of the case was not fully given.

3. It is fairly inferable from the evidence that the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s damage was the negligence of the defendant. The evidence supports the verdict, and it cannot be held to he excessive.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
       
<S>                                 <C>                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-mos                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1996          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1996          DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                  151,137              788,602
<SECURITIES>                                  0                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                            92,075               92,939 
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0                    0
<INVENTORY>                                   0                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              0                    0
<PP&E>                                        0           17,620,252
<DEPRECIATION>                                0            2,853,348
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        1,354,717           17,160,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         0                    0
<BONDS>                                       0           16,519,887
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0                    0
<PREFERRED>                                   0                    0
<COMMON>                                      0                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                    0                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          1,354,717           17,160,719
<SALES>                                       0                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        545,374            2,164,691
<CGS>                                         0                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         8,274,777            1,912,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          6,970              (16,186)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      507,513            2,163,677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (8,229,946)          (1,928,010)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       9,182,017                    0
<CHANGES>                                     0                    0
<NET-INCOME>                            952,071           (1,928,010)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             35.45               (71.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             35.45               (71.79)



        







</TABLE>
# In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

DECEMBER 2, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED100736 CARL A. HOUSER, JR., APP V STATE OF MISSOURI,

RES

2. ED101272 KEITH WILKINSON ETAL, APP V BARTON MUTUAL INS,

RES
POWER OF ATTORNEY

     We, the undersigned directors of Questar Gas Company, 
hereby severally constitute D. N. Rose and S. E. Parks, and each of 
them acting alone, our true and lawful attorneys, with full power to 
them and each of them to sign for us, and in our names in the 
capacities indicated below, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1998 
and any and all amendments to be filed with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission by Questar Gas Company, hereby ratifying 
and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by the attorneys 
appointed herein to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1998 and any 
and all amendments to such Report.

     Witness our hands on the respective dates set forth below.  

     Signature                      Title             Date


 /s/ R. D. Cash             Chairman of the Board    2-9-99  
R. D. Cash


 /s/ D. N. Rose               President & Chief      2-9-99  
D. N. Rose                    Executive Officer
                                  Director

 /s/ W. Whitley Hawkins       Director               2-9-99  
W. Whitley Hawkins


 /s/ Robert E. Kadlec         Director               2-9-99  
Robert E. Kadlec


 /s/ Dixie L. Leavitt         Director               2-9-99  
Dixie L. Leavitt


 /s/ Gary G. Michael          Director               2-9-99  
Gary G. Michael


 /s/ Harris H. Simmons        Director               2-9-99  
Harris H. Simmons
BOSTON FINANCIAL QUALIFIED HOUSING TAX CREDITS L.P. III
 (A Limited Partnership)








EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002










In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing Tax Credits L.P. III (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.











/s/Kenneth J. Cutillo


Kenneth J. Cutillo


Principal Executive Officer and


Principal Financial Officer


Arch Street III, Inc., as


Managing General Partner of


Boston Financial Qualified


Housing Tax Credits L.P. III





Date:           August 15, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4871

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for equity in 

the calculation of Medicare disproportionate share hospital payments 

for hospitals in Puerto Rico. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2004

Mr. MCCRERY (for himself, Mr. ACEVEDO-VILA ́, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mr. 

RANGEL, Mr. GREENWOOD, Mr. BECERRA, and Mr. MENENDEZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for equity in the calculation of Medicare disproportionate 

share hospital payments for hospitals in Puerto Rico.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Puerto Rico Hospitals 

5 Medicare DSH Equity Act of 2004’’. 
2

•HR 4871 IH 

1 SEC. 2. CALCULATION OF MEDICARE DSH PAYMENTS FOR 

2 PPS HOSPITALS IN PUERTO RICO. 

3 Section 1886(d)(9)(D)(iii) of the Social Security Act 

4 (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(9)(D)(iii)) is amended to read as 

5 follows: 

6 ‘‘(iii) Subparagraph (F) (relating to dispropor7 tionate share payments), except that for this pur8 pose—

9 ‘‘(I) the sum described in clause (ii) of this 

10 subparagraph shall be substituted for the sum 

11 referred to in paragraph (5)(F)(ii)(I); and 

12 ‘‘(II) for discharges occurring on or after 

13 October 1, 2004, subclause (I) of paragraph 

14 (5)(F)(vi) shall be applied by substituting for 

15 the numerator described in such subclause the 

16 number of subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospital’s 

17 patient days for a cost reporting period which 

18 were made up of patients who (for such days) 

19 were entitled to benefits under part A of this 

20 title and either were eligible in Puerto Rico on 

21 a categorically needy basis or medically needy 

22 basis as aged, blind or disabled for medical as23 sistance under title XIX.’’.

Æ