alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NIST Privacy Framework

A Tool for Improving Privacy through Enterprise Risk Management

CONTACT | privacyframework@nist.gov

MAILING LIST | groups.google.com/a/list.nist.gov/forum/#!forum/privacyframework

LEARN MORE | www.nist.gov/privacyframework

FACT SHEET | September 2019

s

Why a Privacy Framework

The challenge

It is a challenge to design, operate, or 

use technologies in ways that are mindful 

of diverse privacy needs in an 

increasingly connected and complex 

environment. Deriving benefits from data 

while simultaneously managing risks to 

individuals’ privacy is not well-suited to 

one-size-fits-all solutions. 

Why good cybersecurity doesn’t solve 

it all

While good cybersecurity practices help 

manage privacy risk by protecting 

people’s data, privacy risks also can 

arise from how organizations process 

data to meet their mission or business 

objectives.

Addressing the privacy challenge

The National Institute of Standards and 

Technology (NIST) is developing a 

voluntary privacy framework to help 

organizations with:

• Building customer trust by supporting 

ethical decision-making in product and 

service design or deployment that 

optimizes beneficial uses of data while 

minimizing adverse consequences for 

individuals’ privacy and society as a 

whole; 

• Fulfilling current compliance 

obligations, as well as future-proofing 

products and services to meet these 

obligations in a changing technological 

and policy environment; and

• Facilitating communication about 

privacy practices with customers, 

assessors, and regulators.

NIST’s Collaborative Process

NIST has a long track record of collaborating with 

stakeholders to develop guidelines and standards, 

including through the development of the Framework 

for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity

(Cybersecurity Framework).

To date, NIST has collaborated with stakeholders 

representing a broad diversity of sectors, including 

information technology, financial, government, civil 

society, healthcare, education, cybersecurity, 

identity management, retail, transportation, 

telecommunications, and energy.

Preliminary Draft of the Privacy 

Framework

The Preliminary Draft is modeled after the structure 

of the Cybersecurity Framework to facilitate the use 

of both frameworks together.

It provides a catalogue of privacy protection 

activities and outcomes, as well as a common 

language for communicating privacy risk, in order to 

enable organizations to bring privacy risk into parity 

with their broader enterprise risk portfolio.

The Preliminary Draft is designed to enable 

organizations to manage privacy risks through a 

prioritized, flexible, outcome-based, law-agnostic, 

and cost-effective approach in order to be most 

useful to a broad range of organizations and 

facilitate widespread adoption.

Oct. 2018 Nov. 2018 -

Jan. 2019 Feb. 2019 Apr. 2019

Workshop 

#1

Request for 

Information 

(RFI)

RFI Analysis, 

Framework 

Outline

Discussion 

Draft

May 2019 Jun. 2019 Jul. 2019 Sep. 2019

Workshop 

#2

Supplemental 

Materials

Workshop 

#3

Preliminary 

Draft, RFC
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 12           

                U S WEST Communications, Inc.
              RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                    (Dollars in Millions)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Quarter Ended
                                                 12/31/95   12/31/94
----------------------------------------------- ---------  ---------

<S>                                                  <C>        <C>
Income before income taxes                           $457       $477
Interest expense (net of amounts capitalized)         102         88
Interest factor on rentals (1/3)                       16         18
                                                ---------  ---------
Earnings                                             $575       $583

Interest expense                                      112        104
Interest factor on rentals (1/3)                       16         18
                                                ---------  ---------
Fixed charges                                        $128       $122

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                   4.49       4.78
----------------------------------------------- ---------  ---------


<CAPTION>
                                                    Year-to-Date
                                                 12/31/95   12/31/94
----------------------------------------------- ---------  ---------

<S>                                                <C>        <C>
Income before income taxes                         $1,917     $1,881
Interest expense (net of amounts capitalized)         386        331
Interest factor on rentals (1/3)                       60         70
                                                ---------  ---------
Earnings                                           $2,363     $2,282

Interest expense                                      426        367
Interest factor on rentals (1/3)                       60         70
                                                ---------  ---------
Fixed charges                                        $486       $437

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                   4.86       5.22
----------------------------------------------- ---------  ---------
</TABLE>
Exhibit (21)

		  (21)    SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

						       STATE OF
NAME                                                INCORPORATION
----                                                --------------

The Annapolis Banking and Trust Company                 Maryland
Baltimore Trust Company                                 Delaware
Bank of Southern Maryland                               Maryland
Calvert Bank and Trust Company                          Maryland
The Chestertown Bank of Maryland                        Maryland
The Citizens National Bank                            United States
County Banking & Trust Company                          Maryland
The Eastville Bank                                      Virginia
Farmers & Merchants Bank - Eastern Shore                Virginia
The Fidelity Bank                                       Maryland
The First National Bank of St. Mary's                 United States
The Forest Hill State Bank                              Maryland
Fredericktown Bank & Trust Company                      Maryland
MBC Agency, Inc.                                        Maryland
  Mercantile Life Insurance Company                     Arizona
MBC Realty, Inc.                                        Maryland
Mercantile Mortgage Corporation                         Maryland
  Benchmark Appraisal Group, Inc.                       Maryland
Mercantile-Safe Deposit and Trust Company               Maryland
  Hopkins Plaza Agency, Inc.                            Maryland
  MBC Leasing, Inc.                                     Maryland
The National Bank of Fredericksburg                   United States
Peninsula Bank                                          Maryland
The Peoples Bank of Maryland                            Maryland
Potomac Valley Bank                                     Maryland
The Sparks State Bank                                   Maryland
St. Michaels Bank                                       Maryland
Westminster Bank and Trust Company of
  Carroll County                                        Maryland

Each of the foregoing subsidiaries conducts business under its 
corporate name.
11573.

#### Paris *v.*State of Georgia.

Decided October 13, 1920.

Forfeiture of recognizance; from Taylor superior court — Judge Howard. April 2, 1920.

*Jere M. Moore,*for plaintiff in error.

*C. F. McLaughlin, solicitor-general,*contra.

Smith, J.

This case is controlled by the decision in *Paris*v. *State,*ante, 707.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DIANA GOROKHOVSKY and BORIS SHKOLNIK
, Appellant s ,

v.

DOREEN DESILVA and JOSEPH DESILVA
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 21

- 169

[ January 5, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Cymonie S. Rowe , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2017

- CA

012993

- XXXX

- MB

.

Pavel Kogan of The Kogan Law Firm, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Loretta Bangor of the Law Offi ce of Loretta Bangor, Lake Worth, for appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).

C ONNER , C.J., W ARNER and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4847 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4847

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 560 Bay Isles Road in Longboat Key, Florida, as the ``Lieutenant 
           General James V. Edmundson Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 15, 2004

 Ms. Harris (for herself, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Boyd, Ms. Corrine 
 Brown of Florida, Mr. Crenshaw, Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida, Mr. 
Stearns, Mr. Mica, Mr. Keller, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Young of Florida, Mr. 
  Davis of Florida, Mr. Putnam, Mr. Goss, Mr. Weldon of Florida, Mr. 
Foley, Mr. Meek of Florida, Mr. Wexler, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Deutsch, 
Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Shaw, Mr. Hastings of Florida, 
   Mr. Feeney, and Mr. Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 560 Bay Isles Road in Longboat Key, Florida, as the ``Lieutenant 
           General James V. Edmundson Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT GENERAL JAMES V. EDMUNDSON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 560 Bay Isles Road in Longboat Key, Florida, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lieutenant General James V. Edmundson Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Lieutenant 
General James V. Edmundson Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 UNITEDSTATES CODE § 1350**

 

Each of the undersigned herebycertifies that to his knowledge the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thefiscal period ended September 30, 2005 of Allstate Life Insurance Companyof New York filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in suchreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York.

 

November 7,2005

 
|   | /s/ Casey  J. Sylla                                |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Casey J.  Sylla                                    |
|   | Chairman  of the Board and President               |
|   |                                               |
|   |                                               |
|   | /s/ John  C. Pintozzi                              |   |
|   | John C.  Pintozzi                                  |
|   | Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|        |                                                    |        |  |

 

E-5

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>						167,879
<SECURITIES>					164,819
<RECEIVABLES>				758,427
<ALLOWANCES>					10,193
<INVENTORY>                                     	 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                	 0
<PP&E>						17,777
<DEPRECIATION>				9,261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>				1,282,659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>			0
<BONDS>						363,427
<COMMON>					293
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>			0
<PREFERRED>					21,518
<OTHER-SE>					24,532
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	1,282,659
<SALES>						0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>				156,672
<CGS>						0
<TOTAL-COSTS>				119,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>				0
<LOSS-PROVISION>				6,360
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>			18,788
<INCOME-PRETAX>				12,382
<INCOME-TAX>					4,236
<INCOME-CONTINUING>			8,038
<DISCONTINUED>				0
<EXTRAORDINARY>				0
<CHANGES>					0
<NET-INCOME>					8,038
<EPS-PRIMARY>				32,073.00
<EPS-DILUTED>				32,073.00
        

</TABLE>
SUBROUTINE NORCDF(X,CDF)
C
C     PURPOSE--THIS SUBROUTINE COMPUTES THE CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
C              FUNCTION VALUE FOR THE NORMAL (GAUSSIAN)
C              DISTRIBUTION WITH MEAN = 0 AND STANDARD DEVIATION = 1. 
C              THIS DISTRIBUTION IS DEFINED FOR ALL X AND HAS
C              THE PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION
C              F(X) = (1/SQRT(2*PI))*EXP(-X*X/2). 
C     INPUT  ARGUMENTS--X      = THE SINGLE PRECISION VALUE AT
C                                WHICH THE CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
C                                FUNCTION IS TO BE EVALUATED.
C     OUTPUT ARGUMENTS--CDF    = THE SINGLE PRECISION CUMULATIVE
C                                DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION VALUE.
C     OUTPUT--THE SINGLE PRECISION CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
C             FUNCTION VALUE CDF.
C     PRINTING--NONE.
C     RESTRICTIONS--NONE.
C     OTHER DATAPAC   SUBROUTINES NEEDED--NONE.
C     FORTRAN LIBRARY SUBROUTINES NEEDED--EXP.
C     MODE OF INTERNAL OPERATIONS--SINGLE PRECISION.
C     LANGUAGE--ANSI FORTRAN. 
C     REFERENCES--NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS APPLIED MATHEMATICS
C                 SERIES 55, 1964, PAGE 932, FORMULA 26.2.17.
C               --JOHNSON AND KOTZ, CONTINUOUS UNIVARIATE
C                 DISTRIBUTIONS--1, 1970, PAGES 40-111.
C     WRITTEN BY--JAMES J. FILLIBEN
C                 STATISTICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY (205.03)
C                 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
C                 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20234
C                 PHONE:  301-921-2315
C     ORIGINAL VERSION--JUNE      1972. 
C     UPDATED         --SEPTEMBER 1975. 
C     UPDATED         --NOVEMBER  1975. 
C
C---------------------------------------------------------------------
C
      DATA B1,B2,B3,B4,B5,P/.319381530,-0.356563782,1.781477937,-1.82125
     15978,1.330274429,.2316419/
C
      IPR=6
C
C     CHECK THE INPUT ARGUMENTS FOR ERRORS.
C     NO INPUT ARGUMENT ERRORS POSSIBLE 
C     FOR THIS DISTRIBUTION.
C
C-----START POINT-----------------------------------------------------
C
      Z=X 
      IF(X.LT.0.0)Z=-Z
      T=1.0/(1.0+P*Z)
      CDF=1.0-((0.39894228040143  )*EXP(-0.5*Z*Z))*(B1*T+B2*T**2+B3*T**3
     1+B4*T**4+B5*T**5)
      IF(X.LT.0.0)CDF=1.0-CDF 
C
      RETURN
      END
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 422 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 422

   To authorize the Pyramid of Remembrance Foundation to establish a 
 memorial in the District of Columbia or its environs to soldiers who 
  have lost their lives during peacekeeping operations, humanitarian 
      efforts, training, terrorist attacks, or covert operations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2003

Mr. LaTourette introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the Pyramid of Remembrance Foundation to establish a 
 memorial in the District of Columbia or its environs to soldiers who 
  have lost their lives during peacekeeping operations, humanitarian 
      efforts, training, terrorist attacks, or covert operations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.

    (a) In General.--The Pyramid of Remembrance Foundation is 
authorized to establish a memorial on Federal land within the area 
designated as ``Area II'' on the map referred to in section 2(e) of the 
Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1002(e)), to honor members of the 
Armed Forces of the United States who have lost their lives during 
peacekeeping operations, humanitarian efforts, training, terrorist 
attacks, or covert operations.
    (b) Compliance With Standards for Commemorative Works.--The Pyramid 
of Remembrance Foundation shall establish the memorial authorized by 
this Act in accordance with the Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C. 
1001, et seq.), except that subsection (b) and (c) of section 3 of that 
Act shall not apply.

SEC. 2. FUNDS FOR MEMORIAL.

    (a) Use of Federal Funds Prohibited.--Except as provided by the 
Commemorative Works Act, no Federal funds may be used to pay any 
expense of the establishment of the memorial.
    (b) Deposit of Excess Funds.--If--
            (1) upon payment of all expenses of the establishment of 
        the memorial, including payment to the Treasury of the 
        maintenance and preservation amount required by section 8(b) of 
        the Commemorative Works Act; or
            (2) upon expiration of the authority for the memorial under 
        section 10(b) of the Commemorative Works Act,
there remains a balance of funds received for the establishment of the 
memorial, the Pyramid of Remembrance Foundation shall transmit that 
balance to the Secretary of the Treasury for deposit in the account 
provided for in section 8(b)(1) of the Commemorative Works Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 72707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28826]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act; Notice of Agency Meeting

TIME AND DATE:  10:00 a.m., Thursday, December 11, 2014.

PLACE:  Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street (All 
visitors must use Diagonal Road Entrance), Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

STATUS:  Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
1. NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Appraisals.
2. Notice and Request for Comments, Economic Growth and Regulatory 
Paperwork Reduction Act Review.
3. 2015 Corporate Stabilization Fund Oversight Budget.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerard Poliquin, Secretary of the 
Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Gerard Poliquin,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-28826 Filed 12-4-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Millipore Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, Martin D. Madaus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kathleen B. Allen,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/    MARTIN D. MADAUS*             
|Martin D. Madaus                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|March 15, 2006                       



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|                                          
|/s/    KATHLEEN B.
ALLEN*                 
|Kathleen B. Allen                         
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                          
|March 15, 2006                            

---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Millipore Corporation and will be retained by Millipore Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 17, 2018

No. 04-18-00454-CV

Charlene MENDEZ,

Appellant

v.

Jeremy DELGADO,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-CI-10408

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellee has filed a motion for extension of time to file his brief, requesting an extension 

of sixty days. Appellee’s motion is GRANTED, and appellee’s brief is due March 4, 2019. NO 

FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of December, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4750 

To require any uniforms purchased for the Border Patrol to be made in 

the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2004 

Mr. RENZI (for himself and Mr. HAYES) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To require any uniforms purchased for the Border Patrol 

to be made in the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT FOR BORDER PATROL UNI4 FORMS. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all uni6 forms procured for the use of Border Patrol agents shall 

7 be manufactured in the United States substantially all 

8 from articles, materials, or supplies mined, produced, or 

9 manufactured, as the case may be, in the United States. 

Æ