73912 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 239 / Friday, December 12, 2014 / Notices 

3Requesters should note that the filing 

requirements of the NRC’s E-Filing Rule (72 FR 

49139; August 28, 2007) apply to appeals of NRC 

staff determinations (because they must be served 

on a presiding officer or the Commission, as 

applicable), but not to the initial SUNSI request 

submitted to the NRC staff under these procedures. 

proceeding; (b) if no presiding officer 

has been appointed, the Chief 

Administrative Judge, or if he or she is 

unavailable, another administrative 

judge, or an administrative law judge 

with jurisdiction pursuant to 10 CFR 

2.318(a); or (c) if another officer has 

been designated to rule on information 

access issues, with that officer. 

H. Review of Grants of Access. A 

party other than the requester may 

challenge an NRC staff determination 

granting access to SUNSI whose release 

would harm that party’s interest 

independent of the proceeding. Such a 

challenge must be filed with the Chief 

Administrative Judge within 5 days of 

the notification by the NRC staff of its 

grant of access. 

If challenges to the NRC staff 

determinations are filed, these 

procedures give way to the normal 

process for litigating disputes 

concerning access to information. The 

availability of interlocutory review by 

the Commission of orders ruling on 

such NRC staff determinations (whether 

granting or denying access) is governed 

by 10 CFR 2.311.3

I. The Commission expects that the 

NRC staff and presiding officers (and 

any other reviewing officers) will 

consider and resolve requests for access 

to SUNSI, and motions for protective 

orders, in a timely fashion in order to 

minimize any unnecessary delays in 

identifying those petitioners who have 

standing and who have propounded 

contentions meeting the specificity and 

basis requirements in 10 CFR part 2. 

Attachment 1 to this Order summarizes 

the general target schedule for 

processing and resolving requests under 

these procedures. 

It is so ordered. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 4th day 

of December 2014. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Annette L. Vietti-Cook, 

Secretary of the Commission. 

Attachment 1—General Target 

Schedule for Processing and Resolving 

Requests for Access to Sensitive 

Unclassified Non-Safeguards 

Information in This Proceeding 

Day Event/activity 

0 .................... Publication of Federal Register notice of hearing and opportunity to petition for leave to intervene, including order with instructions for access requests. 

10 .................. Deadline for submitting requests for access to Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information (SUNSI) with information: 

Supporting the standing of a potential party identified by name and address; describing the need for the information in order 

for the potential party to participate meaningfully in an adjudicatory proceeding. 

60 .................. Deadline for submitting petition for intervention containing: (i) Demonstration of standing; (ii) all contentions whose formulation 

does not require access to SUNSI (+25 Answers to petition for intervention; +7 petitioner/requestor reply). 

20 .................. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff informs the requester of the staff’s determination whether the request for access 

provides a reasonable basis to believe standing can be established and shows need for SUNSI. (NRC staff also informs any 

party to the proceeding whose interest independent of the proceeding would be harmed by the release of the information.) If 

NRC staff makes the finding of need for SUNSI and likelihood of standing, NRC staff begins document processing (preparation of redactions or review of redacted documents). 

25 .................. If NRC staff finds no ‘‘need’’ or no likelihood of standing, the deadline for petitioner/requester to file a motion seeking a ruling to 

reverse the NRC staff’s denial of access; NRC staff files copy of access determination with the presiding officer (or Chief Administrative Judge or other designated officer, as appropriate). If NRC staff finds ‘‘need’’ for SUNSI, the deadline for any party 

to the proceeding whose interest independent of the proceeding would be harmed by the release of the information to file a 

motion seeking a ruling to reverse the NRC staff’s grant of access. 

30 .................. Deadline for NRC staff reply to motions to reverse NRC staff determination(s). 

40 .................. (Receipt +30) If NRC staff finds standing and need for SUNSI, deadline for NRC staff to complete information processing and 

file motion for Protective Order and draft Non-Disclosure Affidavit. Deadline for applicant/licensee to file Non-Disclosure 

Agreement for SUNSI. 

A .................... If access granted: Issuance of presiding officer or other designated officer decision on motion for protective order for access to 

sensitive information (including schedule for providing access and submission of contentions) or decision reversing a final adverse determination by the NRC staff. 

A + 3 ............. Deadline for filing executed Non-Disclosure Affidavits. Access provided to SUNSI consistent with decision issuing the protective 

order. 

A + 28 ........... Deadline for submission of contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI. However, if more than 25 days remain between the petitioner’s receipt of (or access to) the information and the deadline for filing all other contentions (as established in the notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing), the petitioner may file its SUNSI contentions by that later deadline. 

A + 53 ........... (Contention receipt +25) Answers to contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI. 

A + 60 ........... (Answer receipt +7) Petitioner/Intervenor reply to answers. 

>A + 60 ......... Decision on contention admission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29141 Filed 12–11–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. CP2015–2; Order No. 2277] 

New Postal Product 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recent Postal Service filing concerning 

modification to a Global Expedited 

Package Services 3 negotiated service 

agreement. This notice informs the 

public of the filing, invites public 

comment, and takes other 

administrative steps. 

DATES: Comments are due: December 

15, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http://

www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit 

comments electronically should contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section by 

telephone for advice on filing 

alternatives. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 239 / Friday, December 12, 2014 / Notices 73913 

1Notice of the United States Postal Service of 

Filing Modification to Global Expedited Package 

Services 3 Negotiated Service Agreement, December 

5, 2014 (Notice). 

1 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1). 

2 15 U.S.C. 78a. 

3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

4See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72192 

(May 20, 2014), 79 FR 30209 (May 27, 2014) (SR– 

NYSEArca–2014–60). 

5The month immediately preceding a 

replacement class’s addition to the Pilot Program 

(i.e., December) would not be used for purposes of 

the analysis for determining the replacement class. 

Thus, a replacement class to be added on the 

second trading day following January 1, 2015 would 

be identified based on The Option Clearing 

Corporation’s trading volume data from June 1, 

2014 through November 30, 2014. The Exchange 

will announce the replacement issues to the 

Exchange’s membership through a Trader Update. 

6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 

7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 

202–789–6820. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Notice of Filings 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

On December 5, 2014, the Postal 

Service filed notice that it has agreed to 

a Modification to the existing Global 

Expedited Package Services 3 negotiated 

service agreement approved in this 

docket.1 In support of its Notice, the 

Postal Service includes a redacted copy 

of the Modification and a certification of 

compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a), as 

required by 39 CFR 3015.5. 

The Postal Service also filed the 

unredacted Modification and supporting 

financial information under seal. The 

Postal Service seeks to incorporate by 

reference the Application for NonPublic Treatment originally filed in this 

docket for the protection of information 

that it has filed under seal. Id. at 1–2. 

The Modification revises a few 

phrases in the agreement and adds an 

additional Annex 2 to the agreement. Id. 

at 1. 

The Postal Service intends for the 

Modification to become effective on 

January 1, 2015. Id. The Postal Service 

asserts that the modified contract will 

comply with 39 U.S.C. 3633. Id. 

Attachment 2. 

II. Notice of Filings 

The Commission invites comments on 

whether the changes presented in the 

Postal Service’s Notice are consistent 

with the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 

3633, or 3642, 39 CFR 3015.5, and 39 

CFR part 3020, subpart B. Comments are 

due no later than December 15, 2014. 

The public portions of these filings can 

be accessed via the Commission’s Web 

site (http://www.prc.gov). 

The Commission appoints Curtis E. 

Kidd to represent the interests of the 

general public (Public Representative) 

in this docket. 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

It is ordered: 

1. The Commission reopens Docket 

No. CP2015–2 for consideration of 

matters raised by the Postal Service’s 

Notice. 

2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the 

Commission appoints Curtis E. Kidd to 

serve as an officer of the Commission 

(Public Representative) to represent the 

interests of the general public in this 

proceeding. 

3. Comments are due no later than 

December 15, 2014. 

4. The Secretary shall arrange for 

publication of this order in the Federal 

Register. 

By the Commission. 

Shoshana M. Grove, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29096 Filed 12–11–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–73777; File No. SR– 

NYSEARCA–2014–136] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE 

Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and 

Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed 

Rule Change Amending Commentary 

.02 To Exchange Rule 6.72 in Order to 

Extend the Penny Pilot in Options 

Classes in Certain Issues Through 

June 30, 2015 

December 8, 2014. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 

‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3

notice is hereby given that, on 

November 26, 2014, NYSE Arca, Inc. 

(the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed 

with the Securities and Exchange 

Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the 

proposed rule change as described in 

Items I, II, and III below, which Items 

have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The 

Commission is publishing this notice to 

solicit comments on the proposed rule 

change from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The Exchange proposes to amend 

Commentary .02 to Exchange Rule 6.72 

in order to extend the Penny Pilot in 

options classes in certain issues (‘‘Pilot 

Program’’) previously approved by the 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) through June 30, 2015. 

The text of the proposed rule change is 

available on the Exchange’s Web site at 

www.nyse.com, at the principal office of 

the Exchange, and at the Commission’s 

Public Reference Room. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

self-regulatory organization included 

statements concerning the purpose of, 

and basis for, the proposed rule change 

and discussed any comments it received 

on the proposed rule change. The text 

of those statements may be examined at 

the places specified in Item IV below. 

The Exchange has prepared summaries, 

set forth in sections A, B, and C below, 

of the most significant parts of such 

statements. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and the 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The Exchange hereby proposes to 

amend Commentary .02 to Exchange 

Rule 6.72 to extend the time period of 

the Pilot Program,4 which is currently 

scheduled to expire on December 31, 

2014, through June 30, 2015. The 

Exchange also proposes that the dates to 

replace issues in the Pilot Program that 

have been delisted be revised to the 

second trading day following January 1, 

2015.5

This filing does not propose any 

substantive changes to the Pilot 

Program: all classes currently 

participating will remain the same and 

all minimum increments will remain 

unchanged. The Exchange believes the 

benefits to public customers and other 

market participants who will be able to 

express their true prices to buy and sell 

options have been demonstrated to 

outweigh the increase in quote traffic. 

2. Statutory Basis 

The proposed rule change is 

consistent with Section 6(b) 6 of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 

‘‘Act’’), in general, and furthers the 

objectives of Section 6(b)(5),7 in 

particular, in that it is designed to 

prevent fraudulent and manipulative 

acts and practices, to promote just and 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES