alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of The InterGroup Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John V. Winfield, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: September 28, 2006                        /s/ John V. Winfield
                                                ----------------------------
                                                John V. Winfield, President
                                                and Chief Executive Officer




[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The InterGroup Corporation, Inc. and will be retained by The
InterGroup Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.]
05

8015381133

—
*

AK NO.

ud ve Citu

Gato
Founat .
#0 Judge's Imtal

\

mm

<

ye

Shs

a "We.

Official Ballot for Wayne Counly, | Utah, November 7, 2000

ELECTIONS

JUL-05-01 THU 09:38 AM

MPLE BALLOY

LT. GOVERNOR'S OFFICE

OCT 2 4 2000

STATE ELECTIONS

ROP aS) is = Des &

OUE G OUEGIET

Hae

Leas rt

ira~ ols 4

Grea

(7 OBA

Sa oS
POMP. FOZ
yo See beef

Lome Oo).

aoe > Tey

pe ST ENO bare)

hil ALD ec 4

Li

C
Ez

fe at) OOK Se £1 J

PESOLETION AMENDENG
STATE RAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROVISIONS

‘Sas! fhe Und Contnacn be prtaded to.

(i) modi jamee ears jo iheeily carten ioc erent
ie,

72 epand Phe bypes ol sereces speed uervoe dich wnery
De eUterind 1 ponce,

CR etter te Legelaters to fronds lor the curnoe of
Tica qeererreed cnet 1 abdiioe te Crmanties, MRI
pallies, sted GT. and spac mervce Earn, oh

(4) exodtity conety sent wd Oot onet dome cf comets Geer GAR
ford ppwaenms;

(Sp reqeets It LngedOune > pr aay ive tana ly amcopet
mt et

(2 arty eeckos (creo,

UD) oxy Po 3.29 sory af ipeciiied a perey verseon..
awd

He |

$0) repeal lerggege that m red retet or pbeteete ean

PROPOSITION 2

Dad Oe Uh Concise de antended ioc miatiinds 2 per
wares? sie Punt heed Coreediog of hecre oeiiertert HR]
pmeney demgeaied by saiaune oF Repeat and spectied J
Deets daraters, Wi mote Tern Te but tard tor be
Ceporind ite he yates Ganend Caed ond Ge porcipat be KARST |
be preserwed et The teed tend uncdons the gomerncr and Sree —
enc te Of both Te Semmes ane thm Hon ol Pap seats
appen bo OS mcomy OF ORE eee Be bot kext ber
Gep7st to the phates Garcon Funct

weed incall pereramert Goosen: aad aciorr
2 omen foe: Cooswets mnt Sore mcpered by ter
United Sums wed Up) courtesy keteod be ant
few oreroepert, pectic cay ord hel)
sepawerent, public and becfes edt scather, cose pt
ped prootediag: sco Gvetingmeed sod Marcary

and Boor,

won Brg age, at

(3 eee pune 20d Bagh eucNien fo anecd «Aes Be 20-
rate lode ry acd omg Cnghc) wt omer aps hare

(Qu de he Gowesd Fund monks apprepesraf cr Gee
fpeted tow sarecet in mecibes lagu ond roguer

Sadi phew bo meena le:

1!) lots? lores baecure and tale) fl property ded =
cares gtbeh an Peco! cane: neler Laew af eo one

sanbed low OTK

Li) reese ucdbew pronase x to prokect property qeert
her? batoliers w scraght by Bm your eet

Eg

-

(lp segues Ge Qormernen! is pee property rs sop? ' be
fnturt, end lo Neertaerus Ceres ly Commer be pemparty
most

+) qe trite of trinber proceedr, Uw dott
teh ae Pe ee
if cwetes 0 De ghate

0 caaly vebdoe eet fe loieted popety ad
pe Icey wed eportiog al ad ceormy how ks tale?
curity Career

P

s

Why should you consider a career in cybersecurity?

Dynamic Field

Cybersecurity evolves quickly so you will

always be learning and developing

new skills. There is ultimate growth

potential — both in your career path and

for learning opportunities.

What to Expect

• Cybersecurity has

something for everyone!

Skills are needed from a

diverse range of backgrounds.

• You will never be bored. New

technology brings new risks.

Creative problem solving takes

you into uncharted areas.

• Job flexibility and highly transferable skills. These skills allow you to

move anywhere in the world and apply to any industry sector.

• Multiple career options that are not just technical. Business, medical,

law, defense, and intelligence all need workers skilled in cybersecurity.

• The NICE Cybersecurity Workforce Framework defines 7 Categories,

and 52 Work Roles of cybersecurity work.

• Multiple career pathways.

Two and four-year degree

programs, certifications, workbased experience, and

apprenticeships are just some

different career pathways that

practitioners have taken to arrive in

their current position.

How to Prepare for a Career in Cybersecurity

• Learn how technologies work.

Explore the basics of

administrating a computer system,

and configuring, running and

maintaining common applications.

Learning how a network works and

some basic coding are also helpful.

• Obtain an industry-recognized credential such as a certification,

academic degree, or certificate of completion. Take some classes

offered in high schools, colleges, and universities, and through training

providers. Explore a wide-range of free online resources. Look for

summer camps or training opportunities to expand your skills.

• Network. Attend a conference or hackathon. Join a Meetup, after-school

club, or professional organization.

• Get hands-on experience. Explore

internship and apprenticeship options.

Participate in a cyber defense, digital

forensics, or cryptography competition.

Or, try a Capture the Flag or Bug

Bounty program.

Pictured Left: Sam Curry made more

thousands finding potential hacks of

businesses, at 18 years of age.

Resources for

Cybersecurity Career Awareness Week

Visit nist.gov/nice/ccaw

for more resources

Key Talking Points

Growing Need, High Demand, and

High Salaries

CyberSeek.org indicates over 300K total

cybersecurity job openings throughout the

U.S. The Department of Labor predicts

that information technology and cybersecurity

jobs will be among the fastest-growing

and highest-paying over the next decade. A

national cybersecurity workforce enhances

America's national security and promotes

economic prosperity. Cybersecurity

workers also earn high entry-level salaries.

Make an Impact

Everywhere you look you will see

examples of cybersecurity having an

effect on everyday life. It has impacts

that extend beyond the digital world

and into the physical one.
Order entered September 19, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00234-CR

JOHN HENRY WILSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-55608-S

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On September 13, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why 

appellant’s brief had not been filed. On September 17, 2013, we received appellant’s brief, 

together with an extension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we 

VACATE the September 13, 2013 order requiring findings.

We GRANT the September 17, 2013 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief 

filed as of the date of this order.

In his brief, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The 

record, however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs 

assessed in this case.
Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN 

DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization 

of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court 

appointed attorney fees. In accordance with Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 103.001, 

the cost bill shall be signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to 

receive payment for the cost. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a 

document explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court 

appointed attorney fee.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary 

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal 

Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
9931.

#### Robinson *v.*Central of Georgia Railway Company *et al.*

Decided July 19, 1920.

Action for damages; from Fulton superior court—Judge Pendleton. June *7,*1918.

After the adoption of the act of Congress of March 21, 1918, “to provide for the operation of transportation systems under Federal control,” etc., and before the issuance of General Order No. 50 by the Director-General of Railroads, this action was brought against the Central of Georgia Railway Company and a street railway company for damages on account of personal injuries alleged to have been received on the 18th day of that month because of negligence in the operation of the defendant’s cars. By demurrer the Central of Georgia Railway Company contended that the action was not maintainable against it, because its railway was not under its control, but was under Federal control, at the time of the alleged injury. The judge of the superior court refused to allow the plaintiff to- amend the petition by substituting the name of the Director-General of Railroads as party defendant, and sustained the demurrer and dismissed the action as to the Central of Georgia Railway Company; and the plaintiff excepted.

*Hill & Adams,*for plaintiff.

*Little, Powell, Smith & Goldstein, Colquitt & Conyers,*for defendants.

Jenkins, P. J.

The answers of the Supreme Court to the questions certified to it by this court in this case are to the effect that while the trial court did not err in dismissing the action on the grounds set out in the demurrer, yet, under the then state of facts as disclosed by the record, the .plaintiff should be allowed to amend his petition by substituting the name of the director-general of railroads as party defendant. 150 *Ga.*41 (102 S. E. 532). The judgment of the court below is therefore affirmed, but with direction that unless there should be urged some other and valid objection not made by the record as now presented, the plaintiff be allowed to amend his petition by setting up the necessary facts in regard to, and naming the proper party defendant to, the said cause; and upon such amendment being-made and allowed, the case shall stand reinstated without prejudice. *Judgment affirmed, with direction. Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.*
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 40948 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
NELSON VALLE , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 6:18

- CR

- 59

- 1

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Nelson Valle has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Valle h a s not filed a response. We hav e reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 16, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-40948 Document: 00514960642 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/16/2019No. 18

- 40948

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-40948 Document: 00514960642 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/16/2019
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Chief Executive Officer Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Capitol Bancorp Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q (the
Form 10-Q) for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Joseph D. Reid, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: April 29, 2005 /s/ Joseph D. ReidJoseph D. Reid
Chief Executive Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Capitol Bancorp Ltd. and will be retained by Capitol Bancorp Ltd. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. E-5
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I,Casey J. Sylla, certify that:

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Allstate Life InsuranceCompany of New York;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)                 Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)                Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                 Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a)                 Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)                Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| August 8, 2006 | /s/ Casey J. Sylla                                   |
|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                | Casey J. Sylla

Chairman of the Board  and President |

 

E-3

----
Secure Software Development Framework

for Generative AI and for Dual Use

Foundation Models

Virtual Workshop
HOUSEKEEPING

• Submit questions using Slido: 

https://app.sli.do/event/pdUcG7qTxsHEZa2nNjvAaD

• Event Code: #SSDF

• Today’s session is being recorded

• Any feedback can be submitted to: ssdf@nist.gov
9:00 AM – 9:15 AM Introduction and Overview

9:15 AM – 10:15 AM

Session 1 - Secure Software Development

Challenges with Large Language Models (LLMs)

and Generative AI Systems

10:15 AM – 11:15 AM Session 2 - Secure Development of LLMs and

Generative AI Systems

11:15 AM – 11:30 AM Break

11:30 AM – 12:30 PM Session 3 - Secure Use of LLMs and Generative

AI Systems

12:30 PM – 12:45 PM Next Steps & Wrap Up

WORKSHOPAGENDA
Introduction and Overview
NIST Trustworthy & Responsible AI Program

• Cultivate trust in the design, development, use, and governance of

artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and systems

• Conduct fundamental and applied research

• Establish benchmarks, data and metrics for evaluation

• Lead and participate in development of technical AI standards

• Contribute technical expertise to inform AI policies

https://www.nist.gov/trustworthy-and-responsible-ai
• Version 1.1 issued in February 2022

• Provide a set of fundamental, sound, and secure software development practices

• Provide a common language for describing secure software development practices for

software producers and acquirers

• Help reduce the number of vulnerabilities in released software and the potential impact of the

exploitation of undetected or unaddressed vulnerabilities, and address the root causes of

vulnerabilities to prevent recurrences

• Focuses on outcomes, not tools and techniques, and applicable to various types of software

development, including AI models

https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/218/final

Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF)
• Inform development of "a companion resource to the SSDF to incorporate secure 

development practices for generative AI and for dual-use foundation models " directed

in EO 14110, Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial

Intelligence.

• Bring together AI developers and researchers and secure software practitioners from

industry and government to discuss the secure software practices and considerations in

developing generative AI models and dual-use foundation models

Objectives of Today's Workshop
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CYNTHIA FAIR, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-0775-CG-L

)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made

under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated June 7, 2005, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this court. 

DONE and ORDERED this 30th day of June, 2005. 

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-00775-CG-D Document 14 Filed 06/30/05 Page 1 of 1
11056.

#### Lucas *v.*Durrence.

Stephens, J. l.

“ Conversion . . involves an unauthorized assumption and exercise of the right of ownership over personal property belonging to another, in hostility to his rights; an act of dominion over the personal property of another inconsistent with his rights; or an unauthorized appropriation.” *Southern Express Co. v. Sinclair,*130 *Ga. 372*(60 S. E. 849).

2. Where a city marshal, acting under instructions from the mayor and council of the city and after notifying the owner, removes from a street of the city an automobile which has been allowed by the owner to remain in the street, as an obstruction, and, with knowledge of the owner, transfers the same to a near-by vacant lot of the city, where he leaves it subject to the disposition of the owner, such action is not a *265conversion, since it is not “an unauthorized assumption and exercise of the right of ownership over personal property belonging to another, in hostility to his rights;” and a verdict for the owner suing in trover is unauthorized by the evidence.

Decided May 5, 1920.

Trover; from Evans superior court — Judge Highsmith. September 8, 1919.

J. *Saxton Daniel, P. M. Anderson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4827 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4827

  To amend the Colorado Canyons National Conservation Area and Black 
  Ridge Canyons Wilderness Act of 2000 to rename the Colorado Canyons 
National Conservation Area as the McInnis Canyons National Conservation 
                                 Area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 2004

    Mr. Walden of Oregon (for himself and Mr. Pombo) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Colorado Canyons National Conservation Area and Black 
  Ridge Canyons Wilderness Act of 2000 to rename the Colorado Canyons 
National Conservation Area as the McInnis Canyons National Conservation 
                                 Area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MCINNIS CANYONS NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA.

    (a) Purpose.--The Colorado Canyons National Conservation Area and 
Black Ridge Canyons Wilderness Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 460mmm et seq.) 
is amended in section 2(b) by striking ``Colorado Canyons'' and 
inserting ``McInnis Canyons''.
    (b) Definitions.--Section 3 of such Act is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Colorado'' and 
        inserting ``McInnis''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``Colorado'' and 
        inserting ``McInnis''.
    (c) Colorado Canyons National Conservation Area.--Section 4 of such 
Act is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``colorado'' and inserting 
        ``mcinnis''; and
            (2) in subsection (a), by striking ``Colorado Canyons'' and 
        inserting ``McInnis Canyons''.
    (d) Advisory Council.--Section 8(a) of such Act is amended by 
striking ``Colorado Canyons'' and inserting ``McInnis Canyons''.
    (e) Short Title.--Section 1 of such Act is amended by striking 
``Colorado'' and inserting ``McInnis''.
    (f) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the ``Colorado Canyons 
National Conservation Area'' shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``McInnis Canyons National Conservation Area''.
    (g) Effective Date.--This section and the amendments made by this 
section take effect on January 1, 2005.
                                 <all>
```