alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I, John C. K. Hui, Chief Executive Officer of Vasomedical, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB of the  Company  for the three
          months ended August 31, 2007 (the  "Report")  fully  complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: October 12, 2007

                                  /s/ John C.K. Hui
                                  -----------------------------
                                  John C.K. Hui
                                  Chief Executive Officer




I,  Tricia  Efstathiou,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  Vasomedical,  Inc.  (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB of the  Company  for the three
          months ended August 31, 2007 (the  "Report")  fully  complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: October 12, 2007

                                  /s/ Tricia Efstathiou
                                  ------------------------------
                                  Tricia Efstathiou
                                  Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1481 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1481

  To revise the authority provided to the President to impose export 
licensing requirements or other restrictions on the export of crude oil 
            from the United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2023

 Mr. Arrington (for himself, Mr. Newhouse, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Cloud, Mr. 
 Babin, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Gooden of Texas, Mr. Fallon, Ms. Van Duyne, 
   Mrs. Miller of West Virginia, Mrs. Bice, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. 
  Crenshaw, and Mr. Jackson of Texas) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To revise the authority provided to the President to impose export 
licensing requirements or other restrictions on the export of crude oil 
            from the United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Continuing Robust and Uninhibited 
Drilling and Exporting Act'' or the ``CRUDE Act''.

SEC. 2. CRUDE OIL EXPORT LICENSING REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS.

    Section 101(d)(1) of division O of the Consolidated Appropriations 
Act, 2016 (42 U.S.C. 6212a(d)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as follows:
                    ``(A)(i) the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of 
                Energy, and the Secretary of Commerce jointly find and 
                report to the President and to the Congress that--
                            ``(I) the export of crude oil pursuant to 
                        this Act has caused sustained material oil 
                        supply shortages or sustained oil prices 
                        significantly above world market levels that 
                        are directly attributable to the export of 
                        crude oil produced in the United States; and
                            ``(II) those supply shortages or price 
                        increases have caused or are likely to cause 
                        sustained material adverse employment effects 
                        in the United States; and
                    ``(ii) the President declares a national emergency 
                based on the findings of a report under clause (i) and 
                formally notices the declaration of a national 
                emergency in the Federal Register; or'';
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``; or'' and inserting 
        a period; and
            (3) by striking subparagraph (C).
                                 <all>
```
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                         |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                      |   |                         |   |
| Date: August 1, 2011 |   | /s/ Marguerite N. Duffy |   |
|                      |   | Marguerite N. Duffy          |   |
|                      |   | Senior Vice President and    |   |
|                      |   | Chief Financial Officer      |   |
|                      |   |                         |   |
June 14, 2022

NCST Investigation

of the

Champlain Towers Collapse

Glenn R. Bell

Associate Lead Investigator
2
Our Charge

3

National Construction Safety Team Act

Technical Cause(s) + Recommendations
Approach

4

A failure hypothesis is an investigative supposition about where and 

how the failure occurred with likely contributing causes.
Examining Failure Hypotheses

5
Examining Failure Hypotheses

6

Source: NIST, using 

ETABS software

Source: NIST not CTS
Examining Failure Hypotheses

7

Source: except where noted, NIST

Permission: MiamiDade County
Examining Failure Hypotheses

8

Source: except where noted, NIST

Permission: MiamiDade County

Source: NIST, using 

ETABS software

Source: NIST

not CTS
National Construction Safety Team

9
Team Organization

10
Project Overview

11

Permission: Town 

of Surfside, FL

Source: ACI

Google Earth image captured 12/2017; downloaded 5/10/2022 Source: NIST

1 2

3 4

11 11
Project Overview

12

Source: NIST Source: NIST

Source: GPR Technical Brief - Olson 

Eng., Inc. (used with permission)

1 2

3

12
Project Overview

13 Source: NIST

Source: NIST, not CTS

4

2 3

1

Source: Hover

Source: NIST, not CTS 13
Project Overview

14

Source: NIST, 

using LSDYNA 

software

Source: NIST

Test specimen detail

Test configuration

Source: NIST, using 

ETABS software

1

2

3
Project Overview

Source: NIST

Source: NIST

1 3

2

4

Source: NIST

Source: NIST

15
Project Overview

16

Permission: Miami-Dade County

3

4

2

5

1

https://nisar.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/get-to-know-sar/interferometry/

Source: NIST

Source: NIST

Source: NIST 16
Recommendations

17

There are enormous implications for the 

life safety of buildings across the United 

States and elsewhere in the world.

The recommendations part of NIST’s report will 

be key to ensuring lessons learned result in 

improvements in practice to see that a disaster 

like the Champlain Towers South collapse never 

happens again.
Budget and Schedule

18

report complete by end 

FY2024

$22 million to remain 

available until 

September 30, 2023

technical work complete 

by end FY2023 
Next Step: Invasive Testing 

19

over 600 pieces of physical evidence

Invasive testing plan

• Extract and test several hundred concrete samples

• Extract and test approximately 200 reinforcement 

samples

• Material/chemical 

properties

• Degradation 

mechanisms

Structural/mechanical 

properties

Considerations

• Analysis of failure hypotheses

• Input for structural tests and computer modeling

• Input for material characterization and degradation 

mechanisms

• Evidence database > location in structure

• Non-destructive testing

• Sampling strategies for characterization 

(statistics/uncertainty)

Source: NIST
DISCUSSION
10607, 10608.

#### Port Wentworth Terminal Corporation *v.*Leavitt; and *vice versa.*

Decided January 6, 1920.

Attachment; from Chatham superior court—Judge Meldrim. February 5, 1919.

*Hilch & Denmark,*for Port Wentworth Terminal Corporation.

*W. W. Gordon,*contra.

Luke, J.

1. A demurrer which is general and attacks the petition as a whole is properly overruled if any part of the petition sets out a legal cause of action. See *Hudson*v. *Hudson,*119 *Ga.*637 (1) (46 S. E. 874). The petition in this case was not subject to the motion to dismiss upon the grounds of misjoinder of causes, nor subject to the demurrers urged against it.

2. The motion attacking the plea of the defendant, upon the grounds thereof and as presented, is without merit. The court did not err in overruling the demurrers to the suit, nor in overruling the motion to strike the defendant’s answer.

*Judgment affirmed on hoth the mam hill of exceptions and the cross-hill.*

*Broyles, O. J., amd Bloodworth, J., concur.*
Exhibit 21



                       SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



                                  State of            Names Under Which
    Names of Subsidiaries       Incorporation         They do Business

City Wide Construction            Missouri      City Wide Construction
  Products Co.                                    Products Co.

Concrete Materials, Inc.          Kansas        Concrete Materials, Inc.

Kansas Sand and Concrete, Inc.    Kansas        Kansas Sand and Concrete, Inc.

Monarch Cement of Iowa, Inc.      Iowa          Monarch Cement of Iowa, Inc.

Salina Concrete Products, Inc.    Kansas        Kansas Building Products
                                                Salina Concrete Products, Inc.

Springfield Ready Mix Co.         Missouri      Springfield Ready Mix Co.

Tulsa Dynaspan, Inc.              Oklahoma      Tulsa Dynaspan, Inc.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1434 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require a member of the Armed 

Forces serving on active duty to receive self defense training once a 

month to combat sexual assault. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2023 

Mrs. LUNA (for herself, Mr. MOSKOWITZ, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr. MOYLAN, Mr. 

CRENSHAW, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. POSEY, Mr. FRY, Mr. DONALDS, Mr. CARSON, Mr. STEUBE, Ms. MACE, Mrs. BOEBERT, Mr. DUNN of Florida, 

Mrs. MCCLAIN, and Mr. DIAZ-BALART) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require a member 

of the Armed Forces serving on active duty to receive 

self defense training once a month to combat sexual 

assault. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Our Sexual As5 sault in the Military Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1434 IH

1 SEC. 2. MONTHLY SELF DEFENSE TRAINING TO COMBAT 

2 SEXUAL ASSAULT FOR A MEMBER OF THE 

3 ARMED FORCES SERVING ON ACTIVE DUTY. 

4 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Chapter 101 of title 10, 

5 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following new section: 

7 ‘‘§ 2018. Monthly self defense training to combat sex8 ual assault 

9 ‘‘One day of physical training each month for a mem10 ber serving on active duty shall consist of self defense 

11 training to combat sexual assault.’’. 

12 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Section 2018 of such 

13 title, as added by subsection (a), shall not be construed 

14 to increase the number of days of training required for 

15 a member of the Armed Forces serving on active duty. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 11.1

                             MICRODYNE CORPORATION
                  STATE RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1996


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                PRIMARY        FULLY DILUTED
                                             -------------     --------------

<S>                                           <C>                <C>
Shares Outstanding at
   Beginning of Period                        12,789,666         12,789,666

Shares Issued During
   the Period                                     21,078             21,078

Dilutive Effect of
   Stock Options                                 227,612             92,681

                                             -------------     --------------

Weighted Average Shares
   Outstanding                                13,038,356         12,903,425
</TABLE>
**OFFICE OF**  **THE A**  **’ ITORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  **8tler~r,,ohlrr** DeDutr 8tati8tlom op.lnlon x0. 

### o-7333

### 522
. 

### So& 0, &. Stlofer, 

### page 3 **or this**  

### tha **pdtioular raot**  

### situation **~~Aowl by**  **709 in**  **your** 

### lottar.

1. now oantxolled by 'Art. 51% or thm 

### 2~1~6 c1yl.lstatUtah The l

t8tutq, ln our opinion, mean8 jurb 

### what. It l 

### yrj the8 18, alat M UDploy.0 unbw oIroumatMoer 

### mant1cin.d ahouu b0 pid.in **ru3.l** 

### wltaL0. rlx fhn* utor domnd **ror pqaont**  

### 8nd the~rallure

0r th.’ WD&OyOX to 

### makeruoh paywnt 

### within tha 

# time l pOOiii$d br th4

l t8tuto **mabjootm**the raploprr **to** tha pmml8y 

### prqtltldioo +n **et.** 

### 5157. .- **Wm** 

### trumt t&&tko hare anrrwab 

### rour **qu*stLOa** 

### gatIUrotorIly. Tourr 

### vorrtruly,.

.
EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

    We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in this Annual  Report (Form
10-K) of National  Computer  Systems,  Inc.  of our report  dated March 2, 1998,
included in the 1997 Annual Report to Stockholders of National Computer Systems,
Inc. and subsidiaries.

    We  also  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  Post  Effective
Amendment  Number 1 to Registration  Statement  Number 2-96965 on Form S-8 (1984
Employee Stock Option Plan),  Registration  Statement Number 33-9830 on Form S-3
(Selling Shareholder),  Registration Statement Number 33-21511 on Form S-8 (1986
Employee Stock Option Plan), Registration Statement Number 333-00377 on Form S-8
(1989 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan),  Registration  Statements Number
33-48509  and  333-00381  on  Form  S-8  (1990   Employee  Stock  Option  Plan),
Registration  Statement Number  333-00379 on Form S-8 (1990 Long-Term  Incentive
Plan),  Registration  Statement Number 33-48510 on Form S-8 (1992 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan),  Registration Statement Number 33-68854 on Form S-8 (option held
by former director),  Registration  Statement Number 333-00383 on Form S-8 (1995
Employee Stock Option Plan), Registration Statement Number 333-25523 on Form S-3
(VUE Selling  shareholders) and Registration  Statement Number 333-25343 on Form
S-8  (NCS/VUE  Stock Option Plan) of our report dated March 2, 1998 with respect
to the consolidated  financial  statements  incorporated  herein by reference in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of National Computer Systems, Inc.

                                                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 22, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000839950
<NAME> North Coast Energy 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,275,582
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,675,148
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    192,639
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,236,187
<PP&E>                                      31,256,954
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,040,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,475,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,506,241
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,438
<COMMON>                                       166,115
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,887,618
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,475,437
<SALES>                                      5,370,692
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,370,692
<CGS>                                        4,730,543
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,730,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (49,019)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             670,539
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,629
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,629
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,629
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000840401
<NAME>                        ACCUHEALTH, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000
<CURRENCY>                                USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                              31
<SECURITIES>                     3,647
<RECEIVABLES>                   17,669
<ALLOWANCES>                    (2,502)
<INVENTORY>                      2,969
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                22,266
<PP&E>                           6,067
<DEPRECIATION>                  (3,252)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  26,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           18,675
<BONDS>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          1
<COMMON>                            51
<OTHER-SE>                         281
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    26,494
<SALES>                          9,973
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 9,973
<CGS>                            6,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   10,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (447)
<INCOME-TAX>                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (219)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                      (447)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (.13)
        

</TABLE>
#### Arkansas Western Railway Company *v.*Robson.

Opinion delivered February 6, 1928.

Carriers — instruction as to safe carriage of cattle. — Where, under bills of lading, shippers were required to accompany their cattle in shipment, an instruction that the carrier was the' insurer of the cattle to destination was erroneous, and in conflict with other instructions requiring- the shippers to prove negligence.

Appeal from Scott Circuit Court; *J. 8am Wood,*Judge;

reversed.

*James B. McDonough, Jr., Josephine R. Brown*and *J ames B. McDonough,*for appellant.

*A. F. Smith,*for appellee.

Humphreys, J.

This is the second appeal in this ease. On the first appeal the facts were fully stated, and reference is made to that case for a statement of the facts in the instant case, as the facts were not materially different on a retrial of the cause. *Arkansas Western Ry. Co.*v. *Robson,*171 Ark. 698, 285 S. W. 372.

The judgment was reversed and the cause was remanded for a new trial because the trial court erred in giving instruction No. 7 at the instance of appellees, which is as follows: “You are further instructed that the burden is upon the defendant company to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the cattle were killed by their own inherent vices, weakness and natural propensities to injure each other, and not on account of the negligence or carelessness of the defendant company.” The court, in reversing the judgment, said: “Under the provisions of the bills of lading and the admission by the appellees that they accompanied these *183cattle in the shipment, the burden was upon the appellees to prove that the injury and damage sustained by the appellees resulted from the negligence of the appellant’s servant.”

In the instant case the court gave instruction No. 3, at the instance of appellees, which is as follows: “You are instructed that, when a railroad company contracts to receive cattle for transportation as a common carrier, and to safely carry and to deliver the cattle to the place of destination, by virtue of its responsibility it becomes an insurer of the cattle against all loss of every kind, except that caused by the act of God, of the public enemy, of public authority,- of the shipper, or from the inherent nature of the cattle.”

This instruction erroneously told the jury that, under the bills of lading, appellant was an insurer of the safe carriage of the cattle to their destination. This instruction was inherently wrong and in direct conflict with other instructions which the court gave, admonishing the jury that appellees must prove negligence on the part of appellant in order to recover damages for the cattle killed and injured. The latter instructions could not cure the inherent defect in the former instruction, No. 3, which was in conflict with them.

On account of the error indicated the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new trial.