alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11778.

#### LACOUNT *v.*THE STATE.

Decided November 9, 1920.

A person knowingly in possession of any quantity of intoxicating liquor, even a spoonful, may be convicted of' a violation of the prohibition law.

A verdict supported by any evidence, however slight, and approved by the trial judge can not be interfered with by this court on the ground that the evidence is not sufficient to support it.

Indictment for possession of liquor; from Madison superior court —■ Judge W. L. Hodges. July 30, 1920.

*Berry T. Moseley,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. S. Skelton, solicitor-general, J. D. Matheson,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

The indictment charged that the accused did “have, receive, possess, and control certain alcoholic liquors,” etc. There was a verdict of guilty. The evidence for the State shows: that “ a batch of jugs and bottles ” was found in the woods near the residence of the accused; that under a shelter was found “a sugar barrel full of bottles and jugs, some pint and quart bottles, and gallon jugs; this was at Lacount’s house, that is, the shelter that we found them under was at his house and on the premises where he lived;” that in his barn and about ten steps from his residence were found some empty kegs; that from his barn a trail led to where was found a keg “that had about fifteen gallons of whisky in it;” and that in his back yard were found a jug and two kegs that recently contained whisky, and “one with a tablespoonful of whisky in it.” The motion for a new trial *768contained the usual general grounds only. It is settled by repeated rulings of this court that “whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to control the judgment of the trial court.” *Toole*v. *Jones,*19 *Ga. App.*24 (90 S. E. 732). See also *Bradham*v. *State,*21 *Ga. App.*510 (94 S. E. 618), and cases cited. There is some evidence to support the finding of the jury in this case. In addition this court is committed to the proposition that under the present prohibition laws of the State the accused would be guilty, under this indictment, if he knowingly had in his possession any quantity of intoxicating liquor, “even a spoonful.” See *Biddy*v. *State,*22 *Ga. App.*784 (97 S. E. 196).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WENDY WILLIAMS, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-00215-KD-B

MOBILE POLICE DEPARTMENT, :

Defendant. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues

raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which

objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and dated May 20, 2010, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. 

It is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice as frivolous

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

DONE and ORDERED this the 10th day of June 2010.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00215-KD-B Document 24 Filed 06/10/10 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.1***

 

SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of California Coastal Communities, Inc. (the  “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raymond J. Pacini, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) orRule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by 18 U.S.C. 1350 has been provided to CaliforniaCoastal Communities, Inc. and will be retained by California CoastalCommunities, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated: May 6, 2005 | /s/ Raymond J. Pacini   |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                    | Raymond J. Pacini       |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----

*In accordance withclause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), the above certification (A) shall notbe deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section,and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company explicitly incorporatesit by reference in any such filing.

 

----
Requesting Items - Documents and Materials in 

the OWM Contacts System 

1. Log in to the OWM Contacts System Database with your username and password: tsapps.nist.gov/WMD/.

2. Once you log into the Main screen, select the My Items button from the top menu.

3. On the My Items – Documents and Materials page, click on the Request an item button.

NIST Weights and Measures Page 1 of 2 INS4001 – Feb. 2021 (rev. 1) 
 

 

Requesting Items - Documents and Materials in 

the OWM Contacts System 

4. Under “Selection Criteria” use the downwards arrow next to the Type field to select the type of document or

material in which you are interested.

Select Type 

5. From the “List of Available Items”, select the Request button for that document or material. For some documents

you may have the option to select a “quantity.”

Quantity 

Submit 

Electronic copies: Some documents or materials may not be available in hardcopy format but are available in 

electronic format (e.g., pdf, docx). Electronic versions are available at: www.nist.gov/pml/weights-andmeasures/publications. 

6. Once the document has been selected, click on the Submit button. Your document or material request will be

processed by NIST OWM and you will receive a confirmation email.

7. You can also request documents or materials by:

Phone: (301) 975-4004 

Email: owm@nist.gov 

NIST Weights and Measures Page 2 of 2 INS4001 – Feb. 2021 (rev. 1)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE SEPTEMBER
30, 1996 UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VINEYARD NATIONAL BANCORP AND
SUBSIDIAR AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       6,393,504
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         594,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,504,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  9,265,440
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     93,472,236
<ALLOWANCE>                                    717,627
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             119,454,829
<DEPOSITS>                                 110,522,462
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,304,363
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,106,258
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,521,746
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             119,454,829
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,936,823
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              519,791
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               192,678
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,649,292
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,080,677
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,081,165
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,566,127
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  333,900
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,720,984
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (111,640)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (113,240)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     5.8
<LOANS-NON>                                    436,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   121,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              2,537,646
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               783,466
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  577,609
<RECOVERIES>                                   177,870
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              717,627
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           717,627
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<page>	EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund II L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
A. Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		May 17, 2004
Exhibit 32.2
Security

Protecting electronic health information is crucial to 

organizations exchanging data across the 

healthcare enterprise.

Overview

Collaborating with stakeholders, NIST provides standards, guidelines, tools, and 

technologies to protect information systems, including health IT systems, against 

threats to the confidentiality of information, integrity of information and processes, and availability of information and services.

Industry Need Addressed

With the increased use of electronic health record systems, organizations need guidance to effectively and efficiently 

manage their security programs, including handling the challenges associated with electronic data exchange and 

ensuring the data is adequately protected.

Impact

These research efforts result in standards, guidelines, tools, and technologies that are being used to provide for the 

confidentiality, integrity, and availability of health information and information systems. 

For additional information, please visit http://www.nist.gov/healthcare/security/index.cfm

NIST Approach

Specific for health IT, researchers are:

Key Contacts

Kevin Stine

Information Technology Laboratory

Computer Security Division

kevin.stine@nist.gov

(301) 975-4483

• Leveraging security automation principles and specifications to develop baseline security configuration 

checklists and tool kits to aid organizations in implementing the HIPAA Security Rule standards and 

implementation specifications.

• Developing a harmonized set of security principles for use in establishing architectures supporting the 

exchange of health information.

• Conducting outreach and awareness on security challenges, threats and safeguards, including presentations at 

industry conferences, workshops, federal advisory committees and at other federal agencies on the application 

of security standards and guidelines to support health IT implementations.

Version 1.0 - February 2011

Matt Scholl

Information Technology Laboratory

Computer Security Division

matthew.scholl@nist.gov

(301) 975-2941
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAGED HASHEM ABDULLAH AL 

QADASI, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting 

Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-72502 

Agency No. A200-268-293 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 27, 2018**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. 

Maged Hashem Abdullah Al Qadasi, a native and citizen of Yemen, 

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order 

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his 

application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 3 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-72502 

Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We 

review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 

453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that the harm Al Qadasi 

suffered in Yemen did not rise to the level of past persecution. See Nahrvani v. 

Gonzales, 399 F.3d 1148, 1153-54 (9th Cir. 2005) (record did not compel the 

conclusion that petitioner’s past harm constituted persecution); Lim v. INS, 224 

F.3d 929, 936 (9th Cir. 2000) (persecution is an “extreme concept” that includes 

the “infliction of suffering or harm”). Substantial evidence also supports the 

agency’s finding that Al Qadasi did not establish a well-founded fear of future 

persecution in Yemen on account of his political opinion or other protected ground. 

See Hakeem v. INS, 273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir. 2001) (“[a]n applicant’s claim of 

persecution upon return is weakened, even undercut, when similarly-situated 

family members continue to live in the country without incident”). Thus, his 

asylum claim fails.

In this case, because Al Qadasi failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he 

failed to demonstrate eligibility for withholding of removal. See Zehatye, 453 F.3d 

at 1190.
3 15-72502 

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of Al Qadasi’s CAT 

claim because he failed to establish that it is more likely than not he will be 

tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of Yemen. See 

Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (2009).

Finally, we reject Al Qadasi’s contentions that the IJ did not consider all of 

his evidence or that the BIA failed to address legal errors.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21

                         MOBILE GAS SERVICE CORPORATION

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   Percent of Voting                State of
       Subsidiary                  Securities Owned              Incorporation
       ----------                  -----------------             -------------
<S>                                <C>                           <C>

MGS Energy Services, Inc.                 100%                      Alabama

MGS Storage Services, Inc.                100%                      Alabama

MGS Marketing Services, Inc.              100%                      Alabama
</TABLE>


               PARTNERSHIPS IN WHICH REGISTRANT OWNS AN INTEREST

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         Partnership                              Equity Ownership
         -----------                              ----------------
<S>                                               <C>
Bay Gas Storage Company, Ltd.                           87.5%

Southern Gas Transmission Co.                            51%
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7521

OLUDARE OGUNDE, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus KELLY HARRISON, Law Library Supervisor; M. A.SHUPE, Operations Officer, Brunswick Correctional Center; J. PERUTELLI, Correctional Officer; DANIEL BRAXTON; S. V. PRUETT, Warden;CAPTAIN FARMER, Captain at Dillwyn Correctional Center; SERGEANT JACKSON; CAPTAIN CALL, Captain at Buckingham Correctional Center; LEE RANDOLPH HARRISON; ELIZABETH TAYLOR CARTER; D. F. MOSLEY, Lieutenant, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-15-7) Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 28, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Oludare Ogunde, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Lee Randolph Harrison, Amelia,Virginia; Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY & WINDELS, Dillwyn, Virginia, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Oludare Ogunde appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of a number of defendants, dismissing most of Ogunde’s claims in this civil rights action, but declining to dismiss two of Ogunde’s claims. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT32.2***

 

SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONSCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CaliforniaCoastal Communities, Inc. (the  “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sandra G.Sciutto, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that based on my knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:   November 13, 2003 | */s/  Sandra G. Sciutto* |   |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                            | Sandra G. Sciutto        |
|                            | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

----

*       In accordance with clause (ii) of Item601(b)(32), the above certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and(B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing underthe Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, except to the extent that the Company explicitly incorporates it byreference in any such filing.

 

----
EXHIBIT (ii)




NOTE-HOLDER                        ORIGINAL AMOUNT          MATURITY DATE
                                      OF NOTE
Walter L. Koon, Jr.

Indiana University Foundation         $167,426.65          February 15, 1998

John W. Biddinger                      $93,333.06          February 15, 1998

Robert A. Davies                      $124,469.18          February 15, 1998

John Cederdahl

Bankers National Life                 $799,655.11          February 15, 1998

John Cederdahl

Western National Life Insurance
Company                             $3,821,912.77          February 15, 1998

Jan Chenowith

Dan Young IRA Trust                 $265,200.00            February 15, 1998



                                      93
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350
                            (FURNISHED, NOT FILED)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Black Warrior Wireline Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William
L. Jenkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ William L. Jenkins
------------------------------------
William L. Jenkins
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 15, 2005