alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NIST PSCR RESEARCH INVESTMENTS BOLSTER 

PENNSYLVANIA’S ECONOMY 

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Public Safety 

Communications Research (PSCR) Division is the primary federal laboratory 

focused on conducting research, development, testing, and evaluation for 

public safety communications technologies. Their mission is to accelerate 

communications innovation in support of public safety communities and the 

citizens they serve. 

The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 allocated $300 Million 

from the Public Safety Trust fund to NIST PSCR to perform critical public safety 

communications R&D during a 10-year period. PSCR implemented numerous 

research mechanisms to support the development and deployment of the 

Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network: grants, Small Business Innovation 

Research (SBIR) contracts, prize challenge competitions, and internal research. 

These research mechanisms were housed within six research portfolios and crosscutting initiatives to maximize their impact: 

•	 User Interface/User Experience •	 Public Safety Analytics

•	 Location-Based Services •	 Security

•	 Mission Critical Voice •	 Resilient Systems 

While the ultimate impact of these research mechanisms is the increased safety 

of first responders and their communities through improved communications

technologies, PSCR was interested in better understanding how their R&D 

investments to date result in economic impacts that ripple outward to state 

economies. An independent analysis was conducted to demonstrate how PSCR’s 

deployment of the $300 Million from the Public Safety Trust Fund translated into 

broader impacts to the United States, including jobs, earnings, value added, and 

total economic output. PSCR’s R&D investments resulted in economic output 

in 33 of the 50 states. Results of the analysis are presented here. 

For more information, see NIST PSCR’s Economic Impact Study. 

5 Grant Awards 

Totaling $5.4 Million 

Carnegie Mellon University 

(5 awards) 

For additional information of PSCR’s research programs, visit 

6 Prize Challenge 

Participants 

Awards Totaling 

$0.1 Million 

PENNSYLVANIA BY THE NUMBERS 

NIST INVESTMENT 

$5.5 Million 

OUTPUT 

$12.5 Million 

VALUE-ADDED 

$17.5 Million 

EARNINGS 

$10.5 Million 

JOBS 

140 

Output: the total value of economic 

activity circulating through the U.S. 

economy generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Value-Added: how much the 

combined U.S. state economies 

grew over a period of time due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments 

Earnings: the change in household 

earnings in the U.S. economy 

generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Jobs: the change in the number of 

full- and part-time jobs generated 

by each one million dollar change 

in U.S. economic activity due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments 

*All dollar amounts presented 

in 2022 and reflect data as of 

October 2022.

**All values are rounded; thus, the 

sum of the components may not 

sum exactly to the NIST Investment 

. 

amount.

https://www.nist.gov/ctl/pscr
3(b)(1)






							BYLAWS

							OF

						THE MONTANA POWER COMPANY







Adopted on		:	August 22, 1995
As Amended on	:	August 27, 1996



							THE MONTANA POWER COMPANY

							AMENDED BYLAWS


Article	Amendment	Date of Amendment



11	The affairs of the Corporation shall be managed by 	August 27, 1996
	a Board of fifteen (15) Directors.  The Directors
shall be divided into three groups, each as nearly
equal in number as possible.  Each group of
Directors shall stand for election upon expiration
of their terms.  Directors shall hold office for a
term of three (3) years or until a successor is
duly elected and qualified.



	THE MONTANA POWER COMPANY
	CERTIFICATION OF RESOLUTION
	I, R. M. Ralph, Assistant Secretary of The Montana Power Company, a
corporation, hereby certify that the following is a full, true and correct
copy of Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of The Montana
Power Company at a meeting duly called and held August 27, 1996 and that
said Resolution is in full force and effect as of the date of this
certificate.

	RESOLVED, that effective August 27, 1996, the first sentence of
Section 11 of the Bylaws of The Montana Power Company is hereby amended
to reduce the number of Directors to fifteen (15) as follows:

		SECTION 11.  The affairs of the Corporation shall be managed by a
Board of fifteen (15) Directors.


	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the Seal of said
Corporation this 11th day of November, 1996.



					/s/R. M. Ralph
					Assistant Secretary




(SEAL)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6247

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

AMOS CEDRIC DIXON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(CR-98-520, CA-02-2800-6-24)

Submitted: July 22, 2003 Decided: August 25, 2003

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Amos Cedric Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Amos Cedric Dixon, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000), based upon Amendment 599 to the

Sentencing Guidelines. At the outset, we must determine whether

Dixon timely filed his notice of appeal. In criminal cases, the

defendant must file his notice of appeal within ten days of the

entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); United States v.

Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000). With or without a

motion, the district court may grant an extension of time to file

of up to thirty days upon a showing of excusable neglect or good

cause. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d

351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). Where excusable neglect is apparent from

the face of record, we need not remand the case to the district

court for such determination. Reyes, 759 F.2d at 354.

The district court entered its order on the criminal docket on

January 2, 2003, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(6); the ten-day appeal

period expired on January 16, 2003. Dixon dated his notice of

appeal January 28, and it was filed on February 6, 2002. Dixon’s

notice of appeal was, therefore, filed beyond the ten-day appeal

period but within the excusable neglect period. Because the

district court’s order denying relief misinforms Dixon that he had

thirty days in which to note his appeal, we find excusable neglect

appears on the face of the record. See Reyes, 759 F.2d at 354; see
3

also Pioneer Inv. Servs. Co. v. Brunswick Assocs. Ltd. P’ship, 507

U.S. 380, 388 (1993) (discussing factors relevant in determining

whether excusable neglect exists); United States v. Clark, 51 F.3d

42, 44 (5th Cir. 1995) (holding “Pioneer controls determinations of

excusable neglect under Rule 4(b)”). Thus, we have jurisdiction

over Dixon’s appeal.

Turning to the merits of Dixon’s appeal, we have reviewed the

record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Dixon v. United States, Nos. CR-98-520, CA-02-2800-6-24

(D.S.C. Aug. 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
BOSTON FINANCIAL QUALIFIED HOUSING TAX CREDITS L.P. III


(A Limited Partnership)





EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing Tax Credits L.P. III (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.











/s/Kenneth J. Cutillo


Kenneth J. Cutillo


Principal Executive Officer and


Principal Financial Officer


Arch Street III, Inc., as


Managing General Partner of


Boston Financial Qualified


Housing Tax Credits L.P. III





Date: February 14, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 5, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40230

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RODERICK ELLIOT,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(4:03-CR-105-ALL)

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roderick Elliot appeals his conviction and sentence for

conspiracy to damage a protected computer. He claims: the

Government breached the plea agreement by recommending a

“particular” term of imprisonment; and he was sentenced in

contravention of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). 

Whether the Government breached the plea agreement is reviewed

only for plain error because Elliot did not object in district

court. E.g., United States v. Munoz, 408 F.3d 222, 226 (5th Cir.
2

2005). The Government reserved the right to oppose any sentence

that, in its opinion, was outside the Sentencing Guidelines, and

defense counsel’s request that Elliot receive only six months of

shock incarceration was prohibited both by the Guidelines and the

applicable statute. See U.S.S.G. § 5F1.7, cmt. a; 18 U.S.C. §

4046(a). Elliot has shown no error, plain or otherwise. 

Elliot’s plea agreement contained an appeal waiver; however,

the Government’s failure to enforce that provision renders it

nonbinding, permitting our reaching the Booker claim. See United

States v. Story, 439 F.3d 226, 231 (5th Cir. 2006). That claim was

preserved in district court. The district court imposed a

discretionary, alternative sentence identical to the one it had

imposed under the mandatory Guidelines, to become effective should

the Supreme Court declare the Guidelines unconstitutional.

Therefore, the Government has carried its burden of proving the

Booker error harmless. See United States v. Saldana, 427 F.3d 298,

314 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 810 (2005).

CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED
OSAC REGISTRY IMPLEMENTATION

RECOGNITION PROGRAM

The Organization of Scientific Area Committees (OSAC) for Forensic Science is seeking assistance to support its 

efforts and ensure proper recognition of forensic science service providers (FSSPs) that have implemented 

standards on the OSAC Registry.

To date, over 125 FSSPs have self-declared their implementation

of standards listed on the OSAC Registry (media releases for some 

of these providers can be found here). Additionally, OSAC has

received public support for standards and implementation from 

seven major forensic science professional organizations (a list of 

these organizations and their statements can be found here).

If your organization has implemented standards on the OSAC 

Registry, either entire standards or parts of them, you are eligible 

to receive recognition as an OSAC Registry Implementer. This 

recognition includes the issuance of an OSAC Implementer 

Certificate. 

If you would like to see how this information is currently used, please 

review the 2022 OSAC Registry Implementation Survey which can be 

found here.

If your organization is already implementing standards on the OSAC Registry and would like to receive 

recognition for your efforts, please fill out the declaration on the Registry Implementation page and 

send it to forensics@nist.gov. 

For additional information, a list of FAQs, and guidance on standard implementation, please visit the OSAC 

Registry Implementation page (QR Code Below) or contact vincent.desiderio@nist.gov.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JOE HENRY SCOTT, III, : 

Plaintiff, : 

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0709-WS-C 

CENTRAL RECORDS AND REVIEW : 

BOARD, 

Defendant. : 

 JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be and is hereby 

DISMISSED without prejudice. 

DONE this 3rd day of June, 2010. 

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:09-cv-00709-WS-C Document 5 Filed 06/03/10 Page 1 of 1
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 01, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 01, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21D0328. JERMEKIA J. MCCOY v. LESLIE W. MCCOY.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

20CV001266
11526.

#### Goldberg *v.*Nelson.

Decided July 24, 1920.

Rehearing denied July 28, 1920.

Broyles, C. J.

The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and*Bloodworth, *JJ., concur.*

*477Certiorari; from Fulton superior court — Judge Bell. April 5, 1920.

Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

*Roy*Lewis, for plaintiff in error.

*Lowndes*Calhoun, contra.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BRADLEY W. WEBB,

Petitioner

v.

WAYNE J. GAVIN, SUPERINTENDENT;

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 110 MM 2014

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12 th day of September, 2014, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED , and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED

.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DIANA GOROKHOVSKY and BORIS SHKOLNIK,

Appellants,

v.

DOREEN DESILVA and JOSEPH DESILVA,

Appellees.

No. 4D21-169

[January 5, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Cymonie S. Rowe, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2017-CA012993-XXXX-MB.

Pavel Kogan of The Kogan Law Firm, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellants.

Loretta Bangor of the Law Office of Loretta Bangor, Lake Worth, for 

appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 

1150 (Fla. 1979).

CONNER, C.J., WARNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:    November 4, 2002                  /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
         ----------------                  ---------------------------------
                                           Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 15-1

August 14, 2000

MCN Energy Group Inc.
Detroit, Michigan

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the
unaudited interim financial information of MCN Energy Group Inc. for the periods ended June 30, 2000 and 1999, as indicated in our
report dated August 14, 2000; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2000, is incorporated by reference in the following Registration Statements:

|         |  |                     |             | 
|-------- |  | ------------------- | ----------- | 
|FORM     |  | REGISTRATION NUMBER
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |                     | 333-02105   | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|         |  |                     | 333-02107   | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|         |  |                     | 33-21930-99 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-3 |  |                     | 333-47137   | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|         |  |                     | 333-47139   | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|         |  |                     | 333-45281   | 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of
the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Detroit, Michigan
United States Department of Com

National Institute of Standards and Technolo

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

Pennsylvania 

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international system of units (SI), documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully 

completed training and proficiency tests, documented calibration intervals, submitted a quality management system, anddemonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate. The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope 

Mass Echelon II Weight Carts30 kg to 1 mg 6000 lb to 3000 lb

1000 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Mass Echelon III 2500 kg to 1 mg

Wheel Load Weighers

≤ 40 000 lb

Volume Gravimetric, I 5000 L to 20 L

Volume Transfer, II 5000 L to 20 L

1500 gal to 5 gal

Length, Bench Steel Tapes≤ 200 ft

___________Katrice LippNIST Office 

5000 lb to 0.001 lb

12 oz to 0.01 oz200 oz t to 0.005 oz t

120 gal to 1 gal

5 gal (Imperial)

Time Stopwatches≤ 24 h

Effective Date

1000 gr to 0.1 gr

Force ≤ 30 lbf

(Rev.: September 2021)
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMDL, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary
L. Dreher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

| |     |                                        |  | 
| | --- | -------------------------------------- |  | 
| | /s/ | Gary L. Dreher                        
| |    
| |     | Chief Executive Officer
March 20, 2003
EXHIBIT 15

To
the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York:

We
have reviewed, in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the unaudited interim financial information of Allstate Life
Insurance Company of New York for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, as indicated in our report dated November 13, 2003; because we did not perform
an audit, we expressed no opinion on such financial information.

We
are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, is incorporated by
reference in the following Registration Statements:

Form S-3 Registration Nos.

Form N-4 Registration Nos.333-58512

333-68344333-100029

333-81970333-94785033-65381


We
also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared
or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/Deloitte &
Touche LLP

Chicago,
Illinois
November 13, 2003

E-2

---