alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32(b)**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of ALLTEL Corporation(the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,Jeffery R. Gardner, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/Jeffery R. Gardner                                |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jeffery R. Gardner                                   |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| March 5, 2004                                        |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to ALLTEL Corporation and will be retained by ALLTEL Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
#### Bradley M. Bates v. Bernard L. Desenberg et al.

*Taxation of costs*— Counsel *fee.*

•Counsel -who have prepared for hearing are not deprived of their right to a full counsel fee by the fact, merely, that the case was disposed of on grounds not raised in the argument.

Motion for retaxation of costs.

Submitted October 4, 1881.

Denied October 5.

*Pope & Ha/rt*for the motion.

*Padgham dk Padgham*against.
EXHIBIT 31.2
                              CERTIFICATION

I, David T. Nguyen, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of The InterGroup
Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: September 28, 2006                      /s/ David T. Nguyen
                                              ---------------------------
                                              David T. Nguyen, Treasurer
                                              and Controller (serving as
                                              Chief Financial Officer)
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-11895

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:13-cr-00222-CEH-DAB-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

DAMION RASHAAD CARDER, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(March 23, 2015)

Before MARCUS, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Damion Carder, has moved to 

withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant 

to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our 

Case: 14-11895 Date Filed: 03/23/2015 Page: 1 of 2 
2

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the 

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Carder’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 14-11895 Date Filed: 03/23/2015 Page: 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
 Date: March 21, 2006
    By:
    /s/ Allister P. GrahamName:
    Allister P. GrahamTitle:
    Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer By:
    /s/ LeAnne M. StewartName:
    LeAnne M. StewartTitle:
    Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Description

Problem

In metrology applications, primary standards for 

AC voltage rely on thermal voltage converters 

that compare the heating effect of AC and DC 

inputs. Direct waveform synthesis from an 

accurate AC voltage source is needed. It would 

provide the first independent check of the 

accuracy of thermal voltage converters and 

change the fundamental method of AC metrology 

from detector-based to source-based calibrations. 

Invention

This invention provides a low-phase noise digital 

to analog converter utilizing Josephson junctions 

in connection with the first programmable voltage 

standards for metrologically accurate waveform 

synthesis and cryogenic radar systems.

 CONTACT 

Technology Partnerships Office (TPO) 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 

TPO@NIST.GOV 

Benefits

Commercial Application

A low noise accurate signal generator for a 

calibration system or a radar system

Competitive Advantage

Provides quantum mechanically accurate 

voltage pulses 

Improves detection of targets in clutter 

which would otherwise not be detected

Josephson junction digital to analog 

converter for accurate AC waveform 

synthesis, Patent 5,812,078

Ref. No. 96-004

Block diagram of one embodiment of the invention where the

mixer is relevant to radar application
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 20, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-30120 Conference Calendar

FREDDIE RAY LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CHRIS SMITH, III; BOBBY HICKMAN; CITY OF LEESVILLE; SYLVESTER DESMOND; WILLIE BANKS, JR.; HARRY JAMES; SCOTT, Lieutenant; KENNETH NOBLE; JOHN J. BOLGER; T. BOLTON; ROBERT ALLEN; DAVID GRIFFITH; GARY COOPER; RANDY PRUITT, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:03-CV-699

- - - - - - - - - - Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * In 2003, Freddie Ray Lewis, a Louisiana resident and a former inmate at the Leesville (La.) City Jail (“Jail”), filed this pro se , in forma pauperis complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that he had been falsely imprisoned at the Jail in 1996 and 1997. The district court granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss pursuant to F ED . R. C IV . P. 12(b)(6), concluding that Lewis’s claims were barred by the res judicata doctrine as the result of the judgment in favor of most of the same defendants in Lewis’s prior civil rights action, Lewis v. Smith , No. 97-CV-1420 (W.D. La. Sept. 11, 2000), and that theNo. 04-30120 -2- claims were barred by the applicable one-year Louisiana limitations statute for personal injury actions. All of Lewis’s claims involving conditions of confinement are indeed barred by the res judicata doctrine, because the judgment in Lewis’s prior civil rights action involved the same cause of action

. See Schmeuser v. Burkburnett Bank , 937 F.2d 1025, 1031 (5th Cir. 1991); Nagle v. Lee , 807 F.2d 435, 439 (5th Cir. 1987). Lewis’s claims, which accrued at the latest by 1997, were also barred by the one-year limitations provision applicable to Louisiana personal injury actions. See Owens v. Okure , 488 U.S. 235, 250 (1989); Jacobsen v. Osborne , 133 F.3d 315, 319 (5th Cir. 1998). Finally, Lewis’s false imprisonment claims are barred by the doctrine of Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). See Randell v. Johnson , 227 F.3d 300, 301 (5th Cir. 2000) ( Heck doctrine applies to former prisoners). The district court did not err in granting the motions to dismiss. See Vulcan Materials Co. v. City of Tehuacana , 238 F.3d 382, 387 (5th Cir. 2001). Lewis’s appeal is without arguable merit, see Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983), and it is DISMISSED as frivolous. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Lewis is warned that any future frivolous filings will subject him to sanctions. Lewis’s motion urging this court to waive “corrections and additions” to his brief and to waive the record-excerpts requirement is DENIED as unnecessary.

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; MOTION DENIED; SANCTION
WARNING ISSUED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          37,458
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,136
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,122)
<INVENTORY>                                    113,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               278,758
<PP&E>                                         188,294
<DEPRECIATION>                                (87,316)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 778,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          112,735
<BONDS>                                        696,844
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           27,070
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                   (168,583)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   778,931
<SALES>                                        183,041
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               183,041
<CGS>                                          116,923
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  116,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,654
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,009
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,504
<INCOME-TAX>                                       167
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                314
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 21,630
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,316)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

Walter Energy, Inc.  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Walter Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report"), I, Lisa A. Honnold, interim Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date: May 7, 2010/s/ LISA A. HONNOLD interim Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         25,142
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             97
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    41,930
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        358,522
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          351,107
<LOANS>                                       295,823
<ALLOWANCE>                                     3,928
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                778,093
<DEPOSITS>                                    629,465
<SHORT-TERM>                                        0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             6,241
<LONG-TERM>                                    96,306
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          790
<OTHER-SE>                                     45,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                778,093
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                17,599
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              15,372
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                5,926
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               38,897
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             15,279
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             20,112
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          18,784
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     180
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                12,516
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 6,088
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,921
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.56
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.43
<LOANS-NON>                                     2,461
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  855
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                3,841
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     123
<RECOVERIES>                                       30
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               3,927
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            3,927
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         3,477



</TABLE>
11517.

#### Carson *v.*The State.

Decided July 13, 1920.

Indictment for assault with intent to murder; from Marion superior court — Judge Howard. March 20, 1920.

*George P. Munro,*for plaintiff in error.

*C. F. McLaughlin, solicitor-general,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence is cumulative in its nature, and is not of such probative value that it would probably result in a different verdict should a new trial be granted.

2. There is evidence to support the verdict, which is approved by the presiding judge, and this court will not interfere.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.01

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nashua Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Andrew B. Albert, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

            (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                              /s/ Andrew B. Albert
                                              -----------------------------
Dated: March 24, 2006                         Andrew B. Albert
                                              Chairman, President and
                                              Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 UNITEDSTATES CODE § 1350**

 

Each of the undersigned herebycertifies that to his knowledge the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thefiscal period ended March 31, 2006 of Allstate Life Insurance Company ofNew York filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York.

 

May 8,2006

 
|   | /s/ Casey  J. Sylla                  |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Casey J.  Sylla                      |
|   | Chairman  of the Board and President |
|   |                                 |
|   |                                 |
|   | /s/ John  C. Pintozzi                |   |
|   | John C.  Pintozzi                    |
|   | Senior  Vice President and           |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer             |
|        |                                      |        |  |  |

 

E-6

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1***

 

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofCalifornia Coastal Communities, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Raymond J. Pacini, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant toRule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by 18 U.S.C. 1350 has been provided to California Coastal Communities,Inc. and will be retained by California Coastal Communities, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated:  August 3, 2004 | /s/ Raymond  J. Pacini   |   |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                        | Raymond J.  Pacini       |
|                        | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

 

----

*In accordance with clause (ii)of Item 601(b)(32), the above certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemedto be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except tothe extent that the Company explicitly incorporates it by reference in any suchfiling.

 

----
<PAGE>



                                                                 Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-53363, 33-53365, 33-53367, 333-02783, 333-02961,
333-02963, 333-33531, 333-38599, 333-34112, 333-34344, 333-45341, 333-76653,
333-40136, 333-64120,333-82002, 333-91656 and 333-91684) of Pharmacia
Corporation of our report dated March 3, 2003 relating to the financial
statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Florham Park, New Jersey
March 25, 2003
! " #$%&'

#()*+**+)*	)$*$#	*

,


----------"----------

#

".
















$"
(/

#(/


01 .
/


!
 ".

1 .
/

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

#2. ,


 ,

,
3 
 !"" ,
  
#$

%&'
 ,

..2".
.2"
4"
 
0
"


,,"

" 4"
5 
064

07

.


46,
#

"

$..""2 " #$

%88 9,"

" ,.9: ,
206"
.
"
,#;%3


,
"

""
,#$%&''&9,

<
,,
6
22040
9

IT IS ORDERED,,
."/

+()+ ;	(*+,


="2
 "06.2"
"


.2".
(as reflected in 

the last judgment issued)  .,"is reduced to 

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

+<
2",
7"
2
9002"",
> .

 ",00
.



IT IS SO ORDERED



/

Judge’s signature

+


/

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

 Southern District of Alabama

TAVARIS LAMON BODY 10-00232-001

11855-003

04-20-2011

Pro Se

✔

✔

06-08-2015

United States District Judge

The defendant was sentenced for a violation of 18 USC Section 922(g)(1). The U.S. Sentencing Commission has not

lowered the Guideline Range for a violation of this statute.

Callie V.S. Granade 

U.S. District Judge

Digitally signed by Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge 

DN: cn=Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge, o=U.S. 

Government, ou=Federal Judiciary, 

email=efile_granade@alsd.uscourts.gov, c=US 

Date: 2015.06.08 11:46:32 -06'00'

Case 1:10-cr-00232-CG-C Document 110 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 1