-

= =

Vendor B- VISIT_POE Left Index 

threshold 124 (far,tar) (0.0102684,0.941667) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0186614 0.00875826 0.010038 0.00669915 0.00303475 

TAR 0.996383 0.987034 0.948943 0.721854 0.493151 

Figure 1. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset VISIT_POE - Left Index 
 

= =

Vendor B-VIST_POE_BVA - Left Index 

threshold 122 (far,tar) (0.0101361,0.931167) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0165794 0.00851186 0.00920219 0.00677383 0.00286765 

TAR 0.985899 0.969801 0.924583 0.774011 0.466165 

Figure 2. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset VISIT_POE - Left Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor B- VISIT_POE_BVA Right Index 

threshold 116 (far,tar) (0.0104752,0.958167) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0170215 0.00855798 0.00958916 0.00868077 0.00286917 

TAR 0.991173 0.98356 0.945373 0.837838 0.616162 

Figure 3. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset VISIT_POE_BVA - Right Index 
 

= =

Vendor B- BEN- Left Index 

threshold 116 (far,tar) (0.0107685,0.878833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0184821 0.00989932 0.00908699 0.0048004 0.00139472 

TAR 0.985978 0.960912 0.900447 0.576271 0.145161 

Figure 4. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset BEN - Left Index 
 

= =

Vendor B- BEN- Right Index 

threshold 116 (far,tar) (0.0108889,0.923667) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0164321 0.0097415 0.00905645 0.0052267 0.00229462 

TAR 0.991634 0.970532 0.940789 0.631579 0.240741 

Figure 5. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset BEN - Right Index 
 

= =

Vendor B- BEN- Left Thumb 

threshold 160 (far,tar) (0.010514,0.938833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.013295 0.0143123 0.00792024 0.00237458 0.00024321 

TAR 0.994752 0.990637 0.955316 0.697802 0.147541 

Figure 6. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset BEN - Left Thumb 
 

= =

Vendor B- BEN- Right Thumb 

threshold 150 (far,tar) (0.0103541,0.959167) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.01236 0.0124243 0.00830361 0.00239966 0.000275178 

TAR 0.99414 0.988868 0.961538 0.829932 0.15873 

Figure 7. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset BEN - Right Thumb 
 

-

= =

Vendor B- DHS10 Left Index 

threshold 116 (far,tar) (0.0103629,0.791833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0230859 0.0132356 0.0105656 0.00656909 0.00253304 

TAR 0.982301 0.934694 0.834788 0.59761 0.193738 

Figure 8. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset DHS10- Left Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor B- DHS10 Right Index 

threshold 114 (far,tar) (0.01002,0.821333) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0212534 0.0126231 0.00942727 0.00564755 0.00281199 

TAR 0.968553 0.954829 0.851896 0.618357 0.271984 

Figure 9. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset DHS10 - Right Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor B- DHS10 Left Thumb 

threshold 124 (far,tar) (0.0102289,0.7365) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0154606 0.0130612 0.00982183 0.00478839 0.00175593 

TAR 0.888259 0.864894 0.712413 0.392713 0.120301 

Figure 10. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset DHS10- Left Thumb 
 

-

= =

Vendor B- DHS10 Right Thumb 

threshold 114 (far,tar) (0.010139,0.758167) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0157301 0.0108446 0.00974376 0.00476945 0.00145988 

TAR 0.913793 0.869811 0.724109 0.424084 0.132812 

Figure 11. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset DHS10 - Right Thumb 
 

-

= =

Vendor B- TXDPS Left Index 

threshold 116 (far,tar) (0.0106275,0.850333) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.020762 0.0126352 0.00990049 0.00641899 0.00228576 

TAR 0.963731 0.942652 0.836806 0.596491 0.306604 

Figure 12. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset TXDPS - Left Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor B- TXDPS Right Index 

threshold 120 (far,tar) (0.0102106,0.8865) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.017005 0.011408 0.00890541 0.00486184 0.0019795 

TAR 0.961494 0.937239 0.882261 0.674847 0.36413 

Figure 13. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset TXDPS - Right Index 
 

-

threshold 122 (far,tar) = =(0.0103166,0.734833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0144 0.00965232 0.0104536 0.00450493 0.00124531 

TAR 0.854646 0.788981 0.664271 0.365741 0.117647 

Vendor B- TXDPS Left Thumb 

Figure 14. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset TXDPS - Left Thumb 
 

-

= =

Vendor B- TXDPS Right Thumb 

threshold 114 (far,tar) (0.0105265,0.7165) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0140741 0.00963328 0.0106526 0.00553076 0.00180586 

TAR 0.811106 0.740109 0.659459 0.395683 0.214286 

Figure 15. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset TXDPS - Right Thumb 
 

-

= =

Vendor B- DOS C- Left Index 

threshold 126 (far,tar) (0.0103566,0.927333) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0222276 0.00918532 0.00824667 0.00388381 0.00284237 

TAR 0.991961 0.978501 0.899482 0.684615 0.475248 

Figure 16. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset DOS-C - Left Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor B- DOS C- Right Index 

threshold 120 (far,tar) (0.0101298,0.9645) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0208462 0.00885517 0.00681629 0.00466525 0.00194454 

TAR 0.994078 0.990676 0.939394 0.8 0.472222 

Figure 17. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset DOS-C - Right Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor B- DHS2 C- Left Index 

threshold 146 (far,tar) (0.0101318,0.908118) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.01709 0.00893207 0.00939907 0.00645567 0.00739345 

TAR 0.985758 0.930547 0.906146 0.727273 0.63745 

Figure 18. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset DHS2-C - Left Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor B- DHS2 C- Right Index 

threshold 138 (far,tar) (0.0100989,0.908628) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0157692 0.0096114 0.00960291 0.00759014 0.00672856 

TAR 0.985663 0.926486 0.918624 0.931818 0.639098 

Figure 19. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor B - Dataset DHS2-C - Right Index