alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<page>						      EXHIBIT 31.01

CERTIFICATIONS


I, Jeffrey A. Rothman, President of Demeter Management Corporation
("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q o
2.	f the registrant;

3.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

4.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and



<page>


6.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of Demeter's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.









Date:   November 15, 2004     /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman
                                 Jeffrey A. Rothman
                                 President,
                                 Demeter Management Corporation,
                                 general partner of the registrant
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of MONONGAHELA POWER
COMPANY (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |                                              
|----------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------
|                  |  |  |  | /s/    JEFFREY D. SERKES                     
|February 28, 2006 |  |  |  | Jeffrey D. Serkes Principal Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 14

- 00395

- CV

Susan COSTNER , Appellant

v. State of STATE of Texas , Appellee From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2000EM502104 Honorable Andy Mireles , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 13, 2014
APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION The trial court signed an Order Dismis sing Petition to Establish the Parent

- Child Relationship on September 14, 2000. On March 3, 2014, appellant filed a “Motion for Leave to File Late Notice of Appeal” in this court in appellate cause number 04

- 14

- 00146

- CV. Because it did not appear as if a ppellant had filed a notice of appeal, this court ordered appellant to file a written response establishing that she had timely filed her notice of appeal. Appellant did not respond, and this court denied her motion as moot and dismissed the appeal for wa nt of jurisdiction on April 30, 2014.04

- 14

- 00395

- CV On May 1, 2014, appellant filed a notice of appeal in this appellate cause number

. However, because it appear ed this court lacks jurisdiction over an appeal from a final judgment that was signed almost fourteen years ago , we ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed. Appellant has not responded; therefore, this appeal is di smissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

- 2

-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              13
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        145
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              4
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         132
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       167
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (1)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (1)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (1)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-58-2014]

      ( print page 74063)    
On August 12, 2014, the Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, grantee of FTZ 7, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board on behalf of Neolpharma, Inc., located within Subzone 7O, in Caguas, Puerto Rico.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (79 FR 48726-48727, 08-18-2014). The FTZ Board has determined that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification is authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: December 10, 2014.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-29341 Filed 12-12-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30566 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAMION S. LYONS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(00-CR-150-ALL-N)

January 8, 2003
Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Having entered a conditional guilty plea to poss ession of,

with intent to distribute, cocaine, Damion S. Lyons appeals the

district court’s denial of his m otion to suppress his confession

and other evidence obtained by law enforcement officers during his
apprehension and arrest. He contends that the district court erred

in crediti ng the testimony of the law enforcement officers and,
therefore, that its factual findings were clearly erroneous.Because the district court’s factual findings rested on its

credibility assessment of Lyons and the law enforcement officers,

its factual findings are accorded “special deference”. S ee

Anderson v. City of Bessemer City , 470 U.S. 564, 574-75 (1985);

United States v. Castro , 166 F.3d 728, 731 (5th Cir.)(en banc),

cert. denied , 528 U.S. 827 (1999)

. Lyons must demonstrate that the

officers’ version of the events w as incoherent or facially
implausible, contradicted by extrinsic evidence, or internally

inconsistent. See U nited States v. Gillyard , 261 F.3d 506, 509

(5th Cir. 2001), c ert. denied , 122 S. Ct. 841 (2002). Although

Lyons attempts to discredit the officers’ account of the events, he

falls short of satisfying the highly deferential standard of review
applicable to the district court’s findings.

AFFIRMED
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 17, 

2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00347-CV

____________

IN RE STEVEN BALLOR, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

 Probate Court No. 1

 Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 403486

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On April 12, 2012, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See

Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator asked this court to compel 

the respondent, the Honorable Loyd Wright, presiding judge of Probate Court No. 1 of

Harris County, Texas, to (1) rule upon relator's motion to expunge or cancel lis pendens; 

and (2) direct the motion be granted.

Relator moved to expunge or cancel a lis pendens in the underlying suit. A hearing 

was held in October 2011, but no ruling on the motion has issued. 
2

Mandamus is proper if the record shows the trial court was asked to rule, had a duty 

to rule, and failed or refused to rule. In re Smith, 279 S.W.3d 714, 715 (Tex. App. --

Amarillo 2007, orig. proceeding). The record shows the trial court was aware of the 

motion. However, the record does not demonstrate relator has complained to the trial 

court regarding his failure to rule. See Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App. --

Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding) (presenting the court with a demand for 

performance provides the trial court an opportunity to rule). We therefore decline to order 

the trial court to rule at this time.

Even though we have jurisdiction to direct the trial court to consider and rule on 

pending matters, we may not tell the trial court what ruling it should make. In re Hearn, 

137 S.W.3d 681, 685 (Tex. App. -- San Antonio 2004, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, 

relator's request that we direct the trial court to grant the motion is denied. 

For these reasons, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jamison.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTIN RAFAEL DIAZ-AMEZCUA, 

AKA Martin Diaz,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney 

General,

Respondent.

No. 15-71040

Agency No. A088-635-404

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 14, 2017**

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Martin Rafael Diaz-Amezcua, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to 

reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 23 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-71040

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Mohammed v. 

Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen based 

on ineffective assistance of counsel, where Diaz-Amezcua failed to show that his

prior counsel’s performance was deficient. See Mohammed, 400 at 793 (to prevail 

on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a petitioner must demonstrate that 

counsel failed to perform with sufficient competence and that he was prejudiced by 

counsel’s performance); Torres-Chavez v. Holder, 567 F.3d 1096, 1102 (9th Cir. 

2009) (counsel’s tactical decision was not ineffective assistance of counsel). 

Contrary to Diaz-Amezcua’s contention, the BIA did not rely on unsupported 

conjecture or make an adverse credibility determination.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Diaz-Amezcua’s motion to 

reopen to apply for new relief as untimely, where it was filed more than two years 

after his final order of removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Diaz-Amezcua 

failed to establish changed country condition in Mexico to qualify for the 

regulatory exception to the filing deadline, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii).

Because these determinations are dispositive, the BIA did not err by not 

reaching the merits of Diaz-Amezcua’s claims for adjustment of status and asylum 

and related relief. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) 

(courts and agencies are not required to reach non-dispositive issues). For the 
3 15-71040

same reason, we do not reach these claims.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6992

WATSON JOHNSON, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA JUSTICE COMMITTEE;

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-95-1655-23-2)

Submitted: October 7, 1997 Decided: November 7, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Watson Johnson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable

cause and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Johnson v. South Carolina, No. CA-95-1655-23-2 (D.S.C. June

19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                              UNITED STATES CODE)


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of North Coast Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 6, 2003
       ---------------------


                                          /s/ Dale E. Stitt
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Dale E. Stitt
                                          Chief Financial Officer









         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.


                                       28
Exhibit 10(ee)

                        RENEWAL AND EXTENSION AGREEMENT

         This Renewal and Extension Agreement ("Agreement") is dated effective
as of January 2 1998, by and between RadioSunGroup of Texas, Inc. ("Borrower")
and Kenneth R. Reynolds, ("Lender").

                               W I T N E S S E T H

         WHEREAS, the Borrower executed and delivered that certain Promissory
Note dated October 31, 1985 (the "Note") in the original principal amount of
$3,127,914.00 bearing interest at the rate stated therein: and

         WHEREAS, the Note is secured by various real and personal property; and

         WHEREAS, the Borrower and Lender have agreed to extend the final
maturity of the Note to June 30, 1998;

         NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the Borrower and Lender hereby agree as
follows:

         1. The Note, including all principal then unpaid shall be due and
payable on June 30, 1998.

         2. The interest rate charged on the Note is hereby changed to equal the
fixed rate of interest of ten percent (10%) per annum. Accrued interest shall be
due and payable on January 31, 1998 and on the final day of each successive
calendar month thereafter. Provided, however, on June 30, 1998, all principal
and interest then unpaid shall be finally due and payable.

         3. Privilege is reserved to prepay this Note at any time. Provided,
however, if this Note is prepaid, regardless of the date of prepayment, such
prepayment shall be accompanied by such additional sums as may be required to
ensure that Holder receives a full six months interest on this Note. For
example, if this Note is prepaid on February 1, 1998 (and assuming the regular
interest payment was made as scheduled on January 31, 1998), the prepayment
shall be accompanied by an additional five months of interest as if the Note
were paid in full on its maturity date of June 30, 1998.

         4. All liens presently securing the Note are hereby ratified and
confirmed as continuing to secure the payment of the Note. Nothing herein shall
in any manner diminish, impair or extinguish the Note or the liens securing the
Note.

         5. Borrower and Lender hereby agree that the present unpaid balance
under the Note is $516,600.00 as of the date of this Agreement.

         6. The Lender represents and warrants to Borrower that he is the lawful
owner and holder of the Note and that Lender has full power and authority to
enter into this Agreement.

         EXECUTED, the date written above.

                                               RadioSunGroup of Texas, Inc.
                                               By: /s/John W. Biddinger
                                               President
                                               and


<PAGE>

                                               By: /s/ Kenneth R. Reynolds
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

BOBBY SMITH, JR., #207658, : 

 Plaintiff, : 

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0588-CG-C 

WARDEN JERRY FERRELL, et al., : 

 Defendants. : 

ORDER

 After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue 

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this 

Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as 

duplicative. 

DONE and ORDERED this 16th day of August, 2010. 

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:09-cv-00588-CG-C Document 8 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31 (b)

Certification Per Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Greggory W. Branning, certify that:

1. I
have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Myers Industries, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2012 which this certification accompanies;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                             
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 25, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Greggory W. Branning                                                                    
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Greggory W. Branning, Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary