alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

### 246

### 248

### 243

### 251Hon. L. S. Johnson - Page 10

Since the plan now under consideration does not "aome within the purview of Article 152&a*, in avower to your question (a) it is the opinion of this departmentthat certificates of such types are not subject to the limitationeand restrict&onecontained in Article 152&a and need not be approvedby the BankingCommissioner. Therefore,we answer question (a) in the affirmative.

Article 696 providesas follows: "Each corporat!.an, oompang or inditidual, doing business in this State a&a bond invfbutment company,or company to place or sell bonds~ eertkkficates or debentures on the part&alpa: r nt or inet&Xment plan, eha.U depotitwith the State masumr, &II cash, or seauritiee approvedby said Treasurer,the sum of five thousand doU.ars,and shaU deposit eea~%*annuaUy ntth eaid Tmmsurer, in oaahor aeetMt&er, te be approvedbysaid offiaer, ten p+w Oknt 0S all iibt rez&am mchved until the suln

depocrited

Ba#)ants

to:ems mndmd thvusandd&lars." %.
**From whet**  **we have**  **.&Ld la**  **&M$ ’**  **tiequ&;onn~~~~~~yr** opinion that it neeessar&lypoL10ws th& the ,FCooparativv

Board Olr~iPboatsrn certlfPcates

OF debentures as vo ths @thy QfbOSld8, Sole 6%. On the contrary, it amvmta to c sale of Therefore, it is our epiai~on that to au&a,

the deposits set forth in instaxlwmz: pl‘&u%. avmpany 18 not requ%red

9n view 0S our bmnwx to que83,ion (a}j it guhrer question (c). We t%rkmm queatibn {d) Pn the
Yours vvry

JR:djm
EXHIBIT 23.01**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 Nos.33-72438, 333-06025, 333-88683 and 333-115470) pertaining to the Nashua Corporation Employees’Savings Plan, Nashua Corporation Amended 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, the Nashua Corporation 1999Shareholder Value Plan and the Nashua Corporation 2004 Value Creation Incentive Plan of our reportdated March 13, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of NashuaCorporation included in the annual report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPBoston, Massachusetts
Report of the 95th National Conference on Weights and Measures11152010
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco RUIZ-STEWART, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 99-10132.

D.C. No. CR 98-20102-RMW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2001.*

Decided May 25, 2001.

Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Francisco Ruiz-Stewart appeals his guilty plea conviction and 48-month sentence imposed for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ruiz-Stewart’s counsel submitted a brief stating that he found no meritorious issues for review. Appellant has not filed a supplemental pro se brief.

Counsel raises the potential issue of the district court’s refusal to depart downward based on cultural assimilation, and an overstated criminal history score. However, we are without jurisdiction to review the district court’s discretionary refusal to depart downward. *See United States v. Tucker,*133 F.3d 1208, 1214 (9th Cir.1998).

Counsel also identifies the potential issue of the extent of the district court’s downward departure. However, we also lack jurisdiction to review the extent of a downward departure. *See United States v. Eureka Labs., Inc.,*103 F.3d 908, 911-12 (9th Cir.1996).

Accordingly, counsel is RELIEVED and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.1

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Although counsel appears not to have filed a separate motion to withdraw, pursuant to the request made in Appellant’s Opening Brief, *539counsel is relieved. *See United States v. Griffy,*895 F.2d 561, 563 (9th Cir.1990).
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXCECUTIVE
OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    
    /s/ Alec C. CovingtonName:
    
    Alec C. CovingtonTitle:
    
    President and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    
    /s/ Robert B. DimondName:
    
    Robert B. DimondTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7963

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus ELAN CHRISTOPHER LEWIS, a/k/a Jamal Xavier Harris, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-94; CA-5-766-3) Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 30, 2006 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elan Christopher Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. David T. Maguire, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Elan Christopher Lewis, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his application for a writ of audita querela as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and dismissing for lack of jurisdiction. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lewis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  March 31, 2004 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:  May 11, 2004                     /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                        Title:   Chief Executive Officer

                                        A  signed   original  of  this   written
                                        statement  required  by Section  906 has
                                        been  provided  to CNL  Income  Fund VI,
                                        Ltd.  and will be retained by CNL Income
                                        Fund  VI,  Ltd.  and  furnished  to  the
                                        Securities  and Exchange  Commission  or
                                        its staff upon request.
#### The Columbus, Chicago, and Indiana Central Railway Company *v.*Brownlee.

APPEAL from the Grant Common Pleas.

*E. Walker,*for appellant.

*J. Brownlee*and *H. Brownlee,*for appellee.

Buskirk, C. J.

The record in this cause was filed July 27th, 1870. At the November Term, 1870, it was continued. On the 29th day of May, 1872, the appellee moved the court to dismiss the appeal because there is no assignment of errors, and that the appellant has failed to prosecute his appeal. We have examined the record, and find that there is no assignment of errors; that no process has been taken out; and that no brief has been filed by the appellant.

The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant, and the clerk is directed to certify this dismissal immediately to the court below.
Proposal for Satellite Session I, International Biometric Performance Conference, 2012 

Altered Fingerprints: Analysis and Detection 

Soweon Yoon and Anil K. Jain 

Michigan State University 

The widespread deployment of Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems (AFIS) in law 

enforcement and border control applications has heightened the need for ensuring that these 

systems are not compromised. While several issues related to fingerprint system security have 

been investigated, including the use of fake fingerprints for masquerading identity, the problem 

of fingerprint alteration has received very little attention. Fingerprint alteration refers to the 

deliberate obfuscation of the fingerprint pattern by an individual for the purpose of masking his 

identity by means of abrading, cutting, applying acid, or performing plastic surgery on fingertips. 

Since the fingerprint alteration is a serious threat to the AFIS, detection and matching of the 

altered fingerprints are on the desired list of most law enforcement and border control agencies. 

In this talk, the followings will be presented: 

 high profile fingerprint alteration cases reported in the press; 

 impact of fingerprint alteration on the accuracy of state-of-the-art commercial fingerprint 

matchers; 

 classification of altered fingerprints into three major categories; 

 a technique to automatically detect altered fingerprints based on analyzing orientation 

field and minutiae distribution; 

 performance evaluation of the proposed algorithm and a standard fingerprint quality 

assessment software, NFIQ algorithm, on a large database of altered fingerprints 

provided by a law enforcement agency.
POWERING THE WORLD’S APPLICATION NETWORKS

Ignasi Barrera

Founding Engineer

DevSecOps and Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA)

for Multi-Cloud Environments

January 2021
Offload network and 

authn/authz functionality to 

the sidecars

No application changes 

required !

Service Service

Proxy Proxy

Configuration Security Discovery

Ingress traffic Egress traffic Mesh traffic 

Data plane Control Plane 

Certificates

Metrics Configuration Metrics

& Policy
The sidecar container runs two 

processes:

● The Envoy proxy

● The istio-agent

Service

istiod 

Data plane Control Plane 

XDS

SDS
The agent generates an x.509 

certificate with the SPIFFE 

identity, a private key, and 

sends a CSR for signing

Service

istiod 

Data plane Control Plane 

SDS Generates certificate

and sends CSR
istiod validates the certificate 

and authenticates the client

making the request, then 

forwards the CSR to the CA to 

have it signed

Service

istiod 

Data plane Control Plane 

SDS

Authenticates client

Checks identity and 

sends CSR to the CA
The CA signs the certificate 

and returns it

Service

istiod 

Data plane Control Plane 

SDS

Signs the 

certificate
When the signed certificate is 

received, the agent pushes it to 

the proxy

Service

istiod 

Data plane Control Plane 

SDS Schedule certificate 

rotation process

Push the certificate to 

Envoy through the 

SDS channel

For any further queries, feel free to contact us at info@tetrate.io

@tetrateio Tetrate www.tetrate.io
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-86225, File No. 333-86187, File No. 2-92311
and File No. 33-80332) of Genesis Worldwide Inc. of our report dated March 9,
2000 relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to
Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 9, 2000
relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP
Dayton, Ohio
March 27, 2000




                                       57
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29213]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8966]


Notice of Proposal To Extend the Agreement Between the Government 
of United States of America and the Government of the Republic of 
Nicaragua Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions on 
Archaeological Material From the Pre-Hispanic Cultures of the Republic 
of Nicaragua

    The Government of the Republic of Nicaragua has informed the 
Government of the United States of America of its interest in an 
extension of the Agreement Between the Government of United States of 
America and the Government of the Republic of Nicaragua Concerning the 
Imposition of Import Restrictions on Archaeological Material from the 
Pre-Hispanic Cultures of the Republic of Nicaragua (``Agreement'').
    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Assistant Secretary of 
State for Educational and Cultural Affairs, and pursuant to the 
requirement under 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(1), an extension of this Agreement 
is hereby proposed.
    Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(2), the views and recommendations of 
the Cultural Property Advisory Committee regarding this proposal will 
be requested.
    A copy of the Agreement, the Designated List of restricted 
categories of material, and related information can be found at the 
following Web site: http://culturalheritage.state.gov.

    Dated: November 25, 2014.
Evan Ryan,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-29213 Filed 12-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Unaudited.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         160,582
<SECURITIES>                                   964,598
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (27,950)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               570,518
<PP&E>                                      16,051,679
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,866,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,720,315
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          934,333
<BONDS>                                     12,919,705
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,720,315
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               718,426
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  327,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               150,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             289,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (48,294)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT**


**TO
      18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the 3rd Quarter Report of **BioLok
      International Inc.** (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and
      the undersigned officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      such
      officer’s knowledge:





a)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
                and





b)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant as of the dates and the periods expressed in the
                Report.






**BioLok
      International Inc.**





/s/
      Bruce
      L. Hollander





Bruce
      L.
      Hollander


Chief
      Executive Officer


September
      15, 2006
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2004 (the "Report") of FMS Financial  Corporation  (the  "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission,  we, Craig W. Yates,  President and
Chief  Executive  Officer,  and  Channing L.  Smith,  Vice  President  and Chief
Financial  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350, as adopted,
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


<S>                                        <C>
/s/ Craig W. Yates                              /s/ Channing L. Smith
------------------                              ---------------------
Craig W. Yates                                  Channing L. Smith
President and Chief Executive Officer           Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)                   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


Date:  August 9, 2004                           Date: August 9, 2004


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1653742
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   351972
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    1618016
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4381219
<PP&E>                                         6505572
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2931084
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9235290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1151265
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        825649
<OTHER-SE>                                     3933253
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9235290
<SALES>                                       15586511
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              15586511
<CGS>                                         12137023
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 15238146
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (20370)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              101521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 175836
<INCOME-TAX>                                     60439
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    115397
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2232

FRANCYNE J. COOPER,

Petitioner,

v.

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIPBUILDING, 

INCORPORATED,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board 

(BRB No. 14-0039).

Submitted: April 28, 2015 Decided: May 11, 2015

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francyne J. Cooper, Petitioner Pro Se. Helen Hart Cox, OFFICE 

OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Washington, D.C.; Mark A. 

Reinhalter, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; 

Benjamin M. Mason, MASON, MASON, WALKER & HEDRICK, PC, Newport 

News, Virginia, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Francyne J. Cooper seeks review of the Benefits Review 

Board’s order affirming the administrative law judge’s orders

denying her motion to set aside a settlement agreement under the 

Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. 

§§ 901-950 (2012), and denying reconsideration, and the Board’s 

order denying reconsideration. Our review of the record 

discloses that the Board’s decisions are based upon substantial 

evidence and are without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny 

Cooper’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the 

petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. 

Cooper v. Northrup Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc., BRB No. 14-0039 

(Aug. 5 & Oct. 7, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED