alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998

<CASH>                                        524,719
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 518,604
<ALLOWANCES>                                   22,000
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,274,200
<PP&E>                                     12,840,276
<DEPRECIATION>                             11,002,314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3,189,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         634,814
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                       25,039
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                    414,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                3,189,768
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            7,414,963
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            7,301,521
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             79,236
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               113,442
<INCOME-TAX>                                      404
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           113,038
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  113,038
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .45
        


</TABLE>
move efflip 0
move eiguide 0
device destroy AnalyzerFlipper1
device destroy MonoGuide
IFClose He3nmr
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2299
RANDY BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:05-cv00114-RWT) Submitted: July 25, 2007 Decided: August 22, 2007 Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randy Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Sheldon Lewis Gnatt, KNIGHT, MANZI, NUSSBAUM & LAPLACA, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Randy Brown appeals the district court’s order granting the Prince George’s County Board of Education’s Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement and denying Brown’s Motion to Set Aside Settlement Agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Prince George’s County Bd. of Educ. , No. 8:05-cv-00114-RWT (D. Md. filed Nov. 9, 2006 & entered Nov. 13, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT T. McGALLAGHER, : 

Plaintiff, : 

vs. : 

CIVIL ACTION 04-0811-M

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, : 

Acting Commissioner of

Social Security, : 

Defendant. : 

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

In this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3), Plaintiff

seeks judicial review of an adverse social security ruling

which denied a claim for Supplemental Security Income (Doc.

10). The parties filed written consent and this action has

been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge to conduct

all proceedings and order the entry of judgment in accordance

with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 (see Doc. 13). 

Defendant has filed a Motion for Entry of Judgment Under

Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with Remand of the Cause

to the Defendant (Doc. 11). Defendant has stated that

Plaintiff’s attorney has no objection to the motion (Doc. 11,

p. 2). 

Defendant states that 

[o]n remand by the Court, the Appeals

Council will vacate the August 19, 2003

Case 1:04-cv-00811-M Document 14 Filed 06/16/05 Page 1 of 3
2

administrative decision and direct the

[Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter

ALJ)] to conduct a hearing in accordance

with 20 C.F.R. § 416.1429 (2004), in which

Plaintiff has the opportunity to testify

and fully assess Plaintiff’s mental

impairment and determine whether his

impairments meet Listing 12.05C. 

Specifically, the ALJ will evaluate

Plaintiff’s IQ scores obtained in April

1992, November 1992, and October 2002, as

well as Plaintiff’s other impairments in

determining whether his impairments meet

Listing 12.05C. 

(Doc. 11, pp. 1-2). This is a tacit admission that

Plaintiff's application was not appropriately considered and

that this action should be reversed. Without reviewing the

substantive evidence of record, this Court accepts Defendant's

acknowledgment of error.

It appears to the Court that the decision of the

Secretary should be reversed and remanded. Such remand comes

under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). See Melkonyan v.

Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). For further procedures not

inconsistent with this report, see Shalala v. Schaefer, 509

U.S. 292 (1993).

Therefore, it is ORDERED, without objection from

Plaintiff, that Defendant’s Motion to Remand under sentence

four be GRANTED (Doc. 11) and that this action be REVERSED and

REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further

Case 1:04-cv-00811-M Document 14 Filed 06/16/05 Page 2 of 3
3

administrative proceedings not inconsistent with the orders of

this Court. Judgment will be entered by separate order.

DONE this 16th day of June, 2005. 

s/BERT W. MILLING, JR. 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-00811-M Document 14 Filed 06/16/05 Page 3 of 3
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 74652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29079]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Parts 204 and 252

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Technical 
Amendments

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is making technical amendments to the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to provide needed editorial 
changes.

DATES: Effective December 16, 2014

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Manuel Quinones, Defense 
Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DARS), Room 3B941, 
3060 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Telephone 571-372-
6088; facsimile 571-372-6094.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule amends the DFARS as follows:
    1. Directs contracting officers to additional procedures and 
guidance by adding references to DFARS Procedures, Guidance, and 
Information PGI 204.7303 at DFARS 204.7302 and 204.7303. The existing 
DFARS 204.7303 is renumbered as 204.7304.
    2. Updates the clause prescription reference at 252.204-7012.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 204 and 252

    Government procurement.

Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

    Therefore, 48 CFR parts 204 and 252 are amended as follows:

0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 204 and 252 continues to 
read as follows:

    Authority:  41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.

PART 204--ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

204.7302  [Amended]

0
2. Amend section 204.7302 in paragraph (b)(2) by removing ``assessing 
contractor compliance'' and adding ``assessing contractor compliance 
(see PGI 204.7303-3(a)(2))'' in its place.

0
3. Revise section 204.7303 to read as follows:

204.7303  Procedures.

    Follow the procedures relating to safeguarding unclassified 
controlled technical information at PGI 204.7303.

0
4. Add section 204.7304 to read as follows:

204.7304  Contract clause.

    Use the clause at 252.204-7012, Safeguarding of Unclassified 
Controlled Technical Information, in all solicitations and contracts, 
including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for 
the acquisition of commercial items.

PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

252.204-7012  [Amended]

0
5. Amend section 252.204-7012 by removing, in the introductory text, 
``As prescribed in 204.7303'' and adding ``As prescribed in 204.7304'' 
in its place.

[FR Doc. 2014-29079 Filed 12-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         207,189
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 207,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (157,763)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   207,189
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,165
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,399
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (234)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (234)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (234)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>REGISTRANT HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### S. M. Woodsmall *v.*A. Q. Meyer.

Bills and Notes — Endorsers.

Where the payee of a note was the first to indorse it, subsequent indorsement by another did not mate him a guarantor of the drawer and the payee; it operated only to bind him with the first indorser and the obligors to the holders of the note; but as between the first and second endorser, .the effect was to bind the latter as surety for the former.

*287APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

November 7, 1873.

*Walker, for appellant.*

*Mundy, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

The note in controversy is made payable to the appellee and first endorsed by him; the subsequent endorsement'of the appellant did not make him a guarantor of the drawers of the note to the appellee, but operated only to bind him with the appellee and the obligors to the bank, as other holders to whom the paper might, before its maturity, be passed; but as between the appellee and the appellant, the import of the endorsement is to bind the latter as surety for the former, and not as á surety or guarantor to him. The averment of the appellee that appellant’s endorsement constituted or was a guaranty to him is expressly contradicted by the answer; and it was not sustained by any evidence. The court should, therefore, have treated the parties as standing in the relative positions legally imparted by the paper, and dismissed the action as was in effect done by the justice of the peace.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion, further pleadings being allowed to both parties, if appearing to be necessary in furtherance of justice.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 29, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 29, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19A1607. ROCO-WILLOW CREEK, LLC et al. v. JD CARPET & PAINT, LLC et al..

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 9

- 4 0 8 0 2 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. M I G U E L R A M O S

- P I N E D A , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 7 : 0 9

- C R

- 5 8 4

- 1

B e f o r e J O L L Y , S T E W A R T , a n d O W E N , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t M i g u e l R a m o s - P i n e d a h a s m o v e d f

o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s

v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. R a m o s - P i n e d a h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 22 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-40802 Document: 00511149617 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
11374.

#### Beard *v.*The State.

Decided May 11, 1920.

Conviction of assault with intent to rape; from Walker superior court — Judge Wright. February *3,*1930.

*C. R. Jones, Rosser & Shaw,*for plaintiff in error.

*C. H. Porter, solicitor-general,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial shows cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(Form S-3 No. 333-06007, Form S-8 No. 333-08323, Form S-3 No. 33-53252, Form 
S-3 No. 33-34303, Form S-3 No. 33-35301, Form S-3 No. 33-41916, Form S-3 No. 
33-82618, Form S-3 No. 33-63841, Form S-8 No. 33-34304, Form S-8 No. 33, 
60969, Form S-8 No. 63537, Form S-3 No. 333-36637, Form S-3 No. 333-48205 and 
Form S-3 No. 333-48217) of National Media Corporation and the related 
prospectuses of our report dated June 29, 1998 with respect to the 
consolidated financial statements and schedule of National Media Corporation 
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 1998.

                                                     Ernst & Young LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
July 7, 1998
<page>	EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund II L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
A. Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		August 16, 2004
<PAGE>


                                                              Exhibit (23)(a)


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
Number 333-26279 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-26275 on Form 
S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-26277 on Form S-8, Registration 
Statement Number 333-26273 on Form S-8, and Registration Statement Number 
333-26281 on Form S-8 of our report dated July 29, 1997, with respect to the 
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Morton International, Inc. 
and subsidiaries, included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report 
(Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 1997.

                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Chicago, Illinois
September 19, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd. at September 30, 1995, and its statement of
income for the nine months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Form 10-Q/A of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd. for the nine months
ended September 30, 1995.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,154,990
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  179,422
<ALLOWANCES>                                   168,773
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,174,862
<PP&E>                                      25,534,398
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,597,087
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,511,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          811,799
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,476,091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,511,397
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,444,689
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  498,577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,089,206
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,089,206
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,089,206
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.01

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Domestic                                                         Incorporated
--------                                                         ------------
<S>                                                              <C>
Nashua International, Inc. (1)                                   Delaware
Nashua Photo Inc. (1)                                            Delaware
Nashua P.R., Inc. (1)                                            Delaware
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Foreign                                                          Incorporated
-------                                                          ------------
<S>                                                              <C>
Nashua FSC Limited (1)                                           Jamaica
Nashua Photo B.V. (2)(3)                                         Netherlands
Nashua Imaging Supplies (UK) Limited (2)(3)                      England
</TABLE>

----------------------------------
(1)  All outstanding capital stock held by Nashua Corporation.
(2)  All outstanding capital stock held by Nashua Photo Inc.
(3)  In liquidation.


----------------------------------

NOTE:   Nashua Corporation holds certificates representing 15% of Multitek, S.A.
        de C.V. (Mexico).
        Nashua Corporation owns a 37% interest in Cerion Technologies
        Liquidating Trust.
        Nashua Corporation owns a 45% interest in Labelnet, S.A. de C.V.
        (Mexico).