alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Diversified Futures Fund II L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,330,483
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,412<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,147,475<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,147,475<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               333,097<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               519,349
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (186,252)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (186,252)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (186,252)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $28,412.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $788,580.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $293,050 and accrued
management fees of $17,869.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $(430,132),
net change in unrealized of $494,906, and interest income of
$268,323.
</FN>



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE SEPTEMBER
30, 2000 UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VINEYARD NATIONAL BANCORP AND
SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       8,089,248
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         198,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,925,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  7,492,808
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     81,131,002
<ALLOWANCE>                                    766,551
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             111,577,621
<DEPOSITS>                                 100,771,943
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,734,200
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,112,243
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,959,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             111,577,621
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,167,359
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              397,400
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               258,236
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,822,995
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,533,210
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,534,280
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,032,715
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  256,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,427,934
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                710,348
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   412,348
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.58
<LOANS-NON>                                     17,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   133,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              2,922,762
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               764,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  273,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    20,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              767,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           767,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Sharon Esposito-Mayer,certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annualreport on Form10-K/A of GP Strategies Corporation;
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 30, 2013



|/s/ Sharon Esposito-Mayer                            | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|Sharon Esposito-Mayer                                | 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CaliforniaCoastal Communities, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in their respectivecapacity as an officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of their respective knowledge, that:

 

•                  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

•                  the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: May 5,  2006                                                 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                     |
| /s/ Raymond J.  Pacini                                                   |   |
| Raymond J.  Pacini   Chief Executive Officer                             |
|                                                                     |
| /s/ Sandra G.  Sciutto                                                   |   |
| Sandra G. Sciutto    Senior Vice President and   Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Humphrey Brock, Jr., * From the 104th District

 Court of Taylor County,

 Trial Court No. 17957B.

Vs. No. 11-11-00252-CR * August 22, 2013

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  919,998
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 919,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     919,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   919,998
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,849
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,849)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,849)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,849)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.41)


</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41735 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MOISES ULLOA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:15

- CR

- 1036

- 1

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Moises Ulloa pleaded guilty to reentering the United States after having previously been removed and was sentenced to 41 months of imprisonment, followed by three years of supervised release. In this appeal, he challenges the district court’s entry of a j udgment under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2), which provides for a maximum sentence of 20 years for an alien whose prior removal was subsequent to a conviction for an “aggravated felony.” Ulloa correctly

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 23, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41735 Document: 00513648093 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/23/2016No. 15

- 41735

2 maintains that the qualifying prior felony, a 2012 New York conviction for attempted robbery, did not constitute an “aggravated felony” because he was not sentenced to a term of imprisonment of at least one year. See § 1326(b)(2); 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F). Accordingly, Ulloa’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRME D. We REMAND the case to the district court for the limited purpose of reforming the judgment to reflect Ulloa’s conviction under § 1326(b)(1) instead of § 1326(b)(2)

. Case: 15-41735 Document: 00513648093 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/23/2016
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 24, 2011

h1017 

# Order

October 24, 2011

143371

MICHIGAN FIRST CREDIT UNION, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellee,

v SC: 143371 COA: 296670 BARBARA J. SMITH, Oakland CC: 2007-082217-CZ Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Appellant,

and

SARAH TROUPE, Defendant.

___________________ _________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 21, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Arthur WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Captain GOODY, Supervisor; Correctional Officer Baker, Property Officer; A. Morris, Sergeant, Property Manager, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-6465.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 17, 2001.

Decided May 29, 2001.

*186Arthur Williams, pro se.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Arthur Williams appeals the district court’s order denying reconsideration of its order dismissing his claim filed under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West 1994 & Supp.2000) as frivolous. A motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b) does not bring up for review the merits of the underlying substantive judgment, nor does it toll the period for filing an appeal of the underlying judgment. *See Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections,*434 U.S. 257, 263 n. 7, 264-65, 268-69, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978).

Because Williams did not file his Rule 60(b) motion within ten days of the district court’s order dismissing his § 1983 complaint, entered on October 24, 2000, the time period for filing his appeal of that order was not tolled. *See*Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(4). The time limit for filing an appeal in this case was thirty days. *See*Fed. R.App.P. 4(a)(1)(A). Therefore, Williams’ appeal, filed on March 20, 2001, is only timely as to the district court’s denial of his subsequent motion for reconsideration on March 14, 2001.* This court reviews a denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion. *See NOW v. Operation Rescue,*47 F.3d 667, 669 (4th Cir.1995).

We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court’s denial of Williams’ motion for reconsideration did not constitute an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 We note that Williams' notice of appeal does not mention the underlying order, but only the court’s order denying reconsideration. *See*Fed.R.App.P. 3(c)(1)(B).
PAUL  MUELLER  COMPANY

EMPLOYEE  BENEFIT  PLAN

SUMMARY  PLAN  DESCRIPTION

**M  U  E  L  L  E  R
**DECEMBER  2003

[cover page]

10-K & EXHIBITS - PAGE 89
**T A B L E   O F   C O N T E N T S

**SECTION I -- GENERAL INFORMATION   
Name of Plan  
1
Plan Sponsor and Benefits Committee  
1
Company  
1
Participating Employers  
1
Plan Administrator  
1
Plan Office and Administrative Manager  
1
Identification Numbers  
2
Type of Plan  
2
Service of Legal Process  
2
Source of Contributions  
2
Payment of Benefits  
2
Plan Year  
2
Language in This Booklet Controlling  
2
Plan Documents Available to Participants and Beneficiaries  
2
Reservation of Authority  
3
Further Information Available  
3
Termination of Plan  
3
Claims Procedures for Life Insurance and Accidental Death and ********
10770.

#### Seaboard Air-Line Railway Company *v.*Vandiver.

Stephens, J.

1. Where one seeks to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by negligence of the defendant, and sues for past, present, and future pain and suffering, and past, present, 'and future lost earning capacity, and where the judge charges the jury that the plaintiff may recover for future pain and suffering and future loss of earnings in the event the injuries are permanent, and charges them that such damages cannot he recovered in the event the injuries are not permanent, an exception that the judge failed *636to charge “ any rule for determining damages in the event that they found the plaintiffs injuries not to be of a permanent character ” is without merit.

Decided September 17, 1920.

Action for damages; from Fulton superior court — Judge Bell. June 10, 1919.

Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

*Brown, Randolph &*Parker, for plaintiff in error.

*Hill & Adams,*contra.

2. There being no fixed rule for estimating the amount of damages for permanent injuries to the person, there was no error upon the part of the trial judge, after charging the jury that the *“*age of the plaintiff, the health he enjoyed, the money he was making,” etc., might be considered in reducing the amount of future earnings to a present cash value, to fail to instruct the jury that they should take into consideration the plaintiff’s expectancy in life or the average yearly amount in which his earnings had been diminished, if diminished at all, by the injuries complained of. *Richmond*v. *Danville R.*Co., v. *Allison,*86 *Ga.*145 (12 S. E. 352, 11 L. R. A. 43).

3. It was not error to fail to instruct the jury that they should reduce to a cash value the gross amount found for all the items of damage proved, including' past pain and suffering and past'earnings, as well as future pain and suffering and future earnings.

4. The defendant cannot complain of a charge which instructs the jury that they should reduce to its present cash value the amount of damages found for future pain and suffering and future earnings.

5. The charge of the court fairly submitted all the issues to the jury and is not subject to any of the objections urged.

6. The evidence warranted the inference that the plaintiff’s injuries were permanent and were caused by the negligence of the defendant. There being evidence that 'the plaintiff had received severe injuries about the face and head as a result of his head having been mashed between two railroad cars, and that as a result of the same his hearing was impaired, his sense of smell and sight affected, his nervous system wrecked, his breathing interfered with, his mouth disfigured and jaw fractured, and that he suffered other functional disturbances and physical injuries, which injuries are permanent and from which he has suffered great pain, it cannot be said that a verdict for $10,000 was excessive and not supported by the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4823

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit foreign media 

representatives to gain admission as visitors coming temporarily to the 

United States for business. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2004

Ms. LOFGREN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit 

foreign media representatives to gain admission as visitors coming temporarily to the United States for business.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF PROHIBITION ON ADMISSION OF 

4 FOREIGN MEDIA REPRESENTATIVES AS VISI5 TORS. 

6 Section 101(a)(15)(B) of the Immigration and Na7 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(B)) is amended by 

8 striking ‘‘or as a representative of foreign press, radio, 
2

•HR 4823 IH 

1 film, or other foreign information media coming to engage 

2 in such vocation’’.

Æ
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Pharmacia Corporation's
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-53363, 33-53365, 33-53367,
333-02783, 333-02961, 333-02963, 333-33531, 333-38599, 333-34112, 333-34344,
333-45341, 333-76653, 333-40136, 333-64120,333-82002, 333-91656 and 333-91684)
of our report dated November 1, 2002 (November 15, 2002 as to Note 24) on the
consolidated financial statements of Monsanto Company and subsidiaries as of
August 13, 2002 and for the period from January 1, 2002 to August 13, 2002; and
of our report dated February 5, 2002 (which report expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, in
2000), on the consolidated financial statements of Monsanto Company and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and for each of the two years in the period
ended December 31, 2001, incorporated by reference in the annual report of
Pharmacia Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.




/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 25, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KENNETH W. YATES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00212-CG-N

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, )

Commissioner of Social Security )

)

Defendant. )

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff’s counsel, Colin Edward

Kemmerly, is hereby awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,028.54 pursuant to the Equal

Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1), as compensation for 6.00 hours of legal

services rendered in this court.

DONE and ORDERED this 14th day of April, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00212-CG-N Document 28 Filed 04/14/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of MONONGAHELA POWER COMPANY (the
Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |                            
|----------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------
|                  |  |  |  | /s/ Philip L. Goulding     
|                  |  |  |  | Philip L. Goulding         
|February 27, 2007 |  |  |  | Principal Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

FRANCIS PATRON §

§ No. 117 , 2018

Petitioner

- Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below: Family Court

§ of the State of Delaware

v. §

§

LUCY O’NEIL § C.A. No. CS16

- 01550

§

Respondent

- Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: October 31 , 2018

Decided: November 2 , 2018

Before VALIHURA

, VAUGHN and SEITZ , Justices.

O R D E R

This 2 nd day of November 2018, having consider ed this matter on the briefs of the

parties and the record below, and having concluded that the same should be affirmed on

the basis of, and for the reasons assigned by the Family Court in its Opinion dated February

7, 2018

,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family Court be

AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice