alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000068622
<NAME> U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              92
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,550
<ALLOWANCES>                                        37
<INVENTORY>                                        109
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,960
<PP&E>                                          32,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,522
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,451
<BONDS>                                          5,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,677
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,617)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,632
<SALES>                                          9,831
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,831
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,431
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,001
<INCOME-TAX>                                       768
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,233
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                           34
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,267
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 16, 2019

Order 

Clerk

January 16, 2019

158512(23)

JSR FUNDING, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 158512

v COA: 344681

Oakland CC: 2018-163107-AV

KRISTINA AVANT,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of motion for reconsideration is considered, and the motion is 

DISMISSED without fees or costs to any party.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(b) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
JUNE 30, 1995.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1995
<CASH>                                          97,667
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,862
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         132,419
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,770
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     (189,326)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,178
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,308
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,421
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,538
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,651)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,651)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,651)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
<FN>
<F1>REGISTRANT HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert William LAWHORN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-6353.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 17, 2001.

Decided May 29, 2001.

Robert William Lawhorn, pro se. Paul Alexander Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, NC, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

*181PER CURIAM.

Robert William Lawhorn seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See United States v. Lawhorn,*Nos. CR-93-233; CA-00-555-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Jan. 22, 2001; entered Jan. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Dennis J. Stevermer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Milastar Corporation and Subsidiaries;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: July 28, 2006/s/ DENNIS J. STEVERMERDennis J. StevermerChief Financial Officer
No. 16,524.

#### Ex Parte Sweeney.

*Appeal.*— In *Term.*— Bond.—The filing of a bond is an essential step in perfecting a term appeal, and where a bond is not filed within the time limited by the order granting the appeal, the appeal must be on notice.

By the Court.

The petition of the clerk asks us to decide whether the filing of a bond is essential to the effectiveness of an appeal in term. We adjudge that the filing of a bond is an essential step in perfecting a term appeal, and that where a bond is not filed within the time limited by the order granting the appeal, the appeal must be upon notice. This doctrine has been asserted in many unreported decisions, made upon motions, and is declared in *Holloran*v. *Midland R. W. Co.,*129 Ind. 274. See, also, 2 Works Pr. Sec. 1090; *June*v. *Payne,*107 Ind. 307; *Goodwin*v. *Fox,*120 U. S. 775; *Webber*v. *Brieger*(Col.), 27 Pac. Rep. 871). In *Jones*v. *82
      *Droneberger,*23 Ind. 74, and in *Ham*v. *Greve,*41 Ind. 531, there are intimations of a contrary doctrine, but there was no authoritative decision upon the question. The failure to file a bond does not, however, prevent an appeal upon notice. As-held in *Burt*v. *Hœttinger,*28 Ind. 214, a bond is not always essential to an appeal; but, as held in *Holloran*v. *Midland R. W. Co., supra,*where there is no bond, notice is. required. A bond is, we may add, not essential to the appeal, although it is necessary to obtain a supersedeas, where-notice is given.

Filed March 31, 1892.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT**
 **TO
        18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the 3rd Quarter Report of **BioLok
        International Inc.** (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2005, as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and
        the undersigned officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
        adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
        to such
        officer’s knowledge:
 
 a)
              The Report fully complies with the
                requirements of Section 13(a)or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
                and  b)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Registrant as of the dates and the periods expressed in the
                  Report.
 
 **BioLok
        International Inc.**
 
 /s/
        Bruce L. Hollander
 Bruce
        L.
        Hollander
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 September
        13, 2005
 
 18
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>


<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>          SEP-30-1999

<CASH>                           13,630
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                     6,187
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                      17,408
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 39,051
<PP&E>                          345,731
<DEPRECIATION>                   45,999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  381,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            38,905
<BONDS>                         233,501
<COMMON>                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                     (187,582)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    381,070
<SALES>                          52,366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 53,133
<CGS>                            46,406
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    56,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    812
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               21,322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (25,643)
<INCOME-TAX>                     10,053
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (15,590)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  11,271
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                     (4,319)
<EPS-BASIC>                      (4.3)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (4.3)



</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 17, 2009

s0714 

# Order

July 17, 2009

138824

TIMOTHY PIERRON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 138824 COA: 282673 Wayne CC: 99-920324-DM KELLY PIERRON, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 3, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties are directed to include among the i ssues to be briefed whether: (1) the defendant’s unilateral
decision to enroll the children in a school district sixty miles from their former school

district and from their father’s home resulted in a change in the custodial environment; (2) the “clear and convincing evidence” or “preponderance of the evidence” standard governed the defendant’s burden of proof; (3 ) the defendant demonstrated that the school change was in the children’s best interests; and (4) the children’s preference for the
Howell school district was “reasonable.”

We further ORDER that the parties mainta in the status quo w ith respect to the

children’s continued enrollment in the Grosse Pointe school di strict, and that trial court proceedings are stayed pending the completion of this appeal.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to place this case on the October 2009 session calendar for argument and submission. Appella nt’s brief and appendix must be filed no later than August 21, 2009, and appellee’s brief and appendix, if appellee chooses to submit an appendix, must be filed no later than September 11, 2009.

The Children’s Law Section and the Fam ily Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus cu riae, to be filed no la ter than September 25, 2009. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented may move the Court for permission to file brie fs amicus curiae, with such briefs to be filed no later than September 25, 2009.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

ONC, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

Authority:Section 3001(c)(3) of the Public Health Service Act.

# SUMMARY:

Section 3001(c)(3) of the Public Health Service Act, as added by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, requires the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) to update the Federal Health IT Strategic Plan (developed June 3, 2008; last updated on September 15, 2011) in consultation with other appropriate federal agencies and in collaboration with private and public entities. The Plan was developed in collaboration across multiple federal agencies, and ONC will seek input on the draft Plan from the private sector through the Health IT Policy Committee. This notice serves to announce that the public comment period for the Federal Health IT Strategic Plan is open through Tuesday, February 6 at 5:00 p.m. (Eastern). ONC welcomes and encourages all comments from the public regarding the Plan.

                        In order for your comments to be read and considered, you must submit your comment via                         *http://www.healthit.gov/​policy-researchers-implementers/​strategic-plan-public-comments.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Matthew Swain, Program Analyst in the Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Analysis,                         *matthew.swain@hhs.gov,*                         202.205.3754.                    

Dated: December 4, 2014.

Matthew Swain,

Program Analyst, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Analysis, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC),  Office of the Secretary (OS).

[FR Doc. 2014-28855 Filed 12-9-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-45-P
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of the President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Whitehall Limited, Inc.
(the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Ronald Mustari
|Ronald Mustari    
|September 1, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, December 17, 2014, 10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

# PLACE:

CPSC's National Product Testing and Evaluation Center, 5 Research Place, Rockville, MD 20850.

# STATUS:

Commission Meeting—Open to the Public

# Matter To Be Considered:

Decisional Matter: Phthalates—NPR.

                        A live Web cast of the Meeting can be viewed at                         *www.cpsc.gov/​live.*

# Note:

If there is a change in location of the meeting, we will post the location change on the CPSC Web site and on the CPSC Public Calendar as soon as possible, but no later than 24 hours before the meeting time. Please check our Web site for possible change in location.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Rockelle Hammond, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: December 10, 2014.

Alberta E. Mills,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-29316 Filed 12-10-14; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 8965]

      ( print page 73686)    
In accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended (“the Order”), I hereby determine that the individual known as Said Ali al-Shihri, also known as other aliases and transliterations, no longer meets the criteria for designation under the Order, and therefore I hereby revoke the designation of the aforementioned individual as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist pursuant to section 1(b) of the Order.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: November 24, 2014. 

John F. Kerry,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2014-29111 Filed 12-10-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-37-P