alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**Certification ofChief Executive Officerof Granite Broadcasting Corporation**

 

Thiscertification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) forthe quarter ended March 31, 2003 of Granite Broadcasting Corporation (the“Issuer”).

 

I,W. Don Cornwell, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that to the bestof my knowledge:

 

(i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii)the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

 
| Dated:   May 5, 2003 |   |                |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------|
|                      |   | /s/ W. DON CORNWELL |
|                      |   | Name:               | W. Don Cornwell |

 

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENTREQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE ISSUER AND WILL BE RETAINED BYTHE ISSUER AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFFUPON REQUEST.

 

31

----
BOSTON FINANCIAL QUALIFIED HOUSING TAX CREDITS, L.P. III
                             (A Limited Partnership)


                                 EXHIBIT [32.1]

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing
Tax Credits L.P. III (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Principal, hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.


                                                /s/Jenny Netzer
                                                Jenny Netzer
                                                Executive Vice President
                                                MMA Financial, LLC

                                                Date:  February 12, 2004










A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2010 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

12-29-2010

USA v. Gelean Mark

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 09-4742

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2010

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2010 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Gelean Mark" (2010). 2010 Decisions. Paper 23.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2010/23
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 09-4742

_____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

GELEAN MARK

also known as 

Kerwin,

 Appellant

Appeal from the District Court of the Virgin Islands, 

Division of St. Thomas and St. John

(Crim. No. 3-09-cr-00020-001)

District Judge: Hon. Curtis T. Gomez, Chief Judge

Submitted pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

Monday, December 13, 2010

Before: McKEE, Chief Circuit Judge, FUENTES and SMITH, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: December 29, 2010 )

OPINION

McKEE, Chief Judge.
2

Gelean Mark appeals the district court=s order denying his motion to dismiss the 

indictment against him. For the reasons set forth below, we will affirm.

Because we write primarily for the parties, and because the district court has set 

forth the factual and procedural history of this case, we need not repeat them here. Mark 

appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment. He argues 

that the indictment violates the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution. 

U.S. Const. Amend V.

Mark incorrectly argues he has been charged with a Continuing Criminal 

Enterprise under 21 U.S.C. § 848 in this indictment. See Appellant’s Br. at 15, 20. The 

indictment in this criminal case charges him with violating the Racketeer Influenced and 

Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. See Jt. Appx. 151-157

(indictment).

We have previously held that “[t]he language and legislative history of RICO 

indicates little doubt that Congress, in enacting RICO, sought to allow the separate 

prosecution and punishment of predicate offenses and a subsequent RICO offense.” 

United States v. Grayson, 795 F.2d 278, 282 (3d. Cir. 1986). Therefore, “successive 

prosecutions for a RICO offense and its underlying predicate offenses are not inconsistent 

with the Double Jeopardy clause.” Id. at 283. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court=s orders substantially for the reasons set 

for in the district court=s Memorandum and Opinion without further elaboration.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000839871
<NAME>                        Black Warrior Warline Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                  US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                             $932,892
<SECURITIES>                                        $50,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    $9,976,341
<ALLOWANCES>                                       $925,288
<INVENTORY>                                      $5,277,308
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                $11,628,685
<PP&E>                                          $19,049,569
<DEPRECIATION>                                  $17,507,399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  $40,691,136
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           $59,737,583
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             $3,739
<OTHER-SE>                                       $(583,393)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    $59,737,583
<SALES>                                         $12,947,142
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                $30,682,197
<CGS>                                                    $0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   $22,882,574
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 $4,779,645
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               $3,595,802
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    $669,285
<INCOME-TAX>                                             $0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            $(4,382,358)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    $968,575
<CHANGES>                                                $0
<NET-INCOME>                                       $669,285
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.46)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated condensed financial statements for the six-months ended Novemer 30,
1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,450,222
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  912,067
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (200,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    801,845
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,105,536
<PP&E>                                         514,834
<DEPRECIATION>                               (210,852)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,533,449
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          672,214
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,741
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,531,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,533,449
<SALES>                                      1,270,328
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,270,328
<CGS>                                          484,980
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  484,980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,607,712
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               200,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,907
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,822,364)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,822,364)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,822,364)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Whitehall Limited, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Kay Carter    
|Kay Carter        
|September 11, 2006
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 2232** 

FRANCYNE J. COOPER , Petitioner ,

v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ; NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIPBUILDING, INCORPORATED , Respondent s .

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board ( BRB No. 14

- 0039 )

.

Submitted : April 28, 2015 Decided: May 11 , 2015

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Francyne J. Cooper, Petitioner Pro Se

. Helen Hart Cox, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Washington, D.C.; Mark A. Reinhalter, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C. ; Benjamin M. Mason , MASON, MASON, W ALKER & HEDRICK, PC , Newport News, Virginia, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Francyne J. Cooper seeks review of the Benefits Review
Board ’s order affirming the administrative law judge ’s order s denying her motion to set aside a settlement agreement under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.

§§ 901

- 950 (2012), and denying reconsideration , and the Board’s order denying reconsideration . Our review of the record
discloses that the Board ’ s decision s are based upon substantial
evidence and are without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Cooper’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
Cooper v. Northrup Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc. , BRB No. 14

- 0039 (Aug. 5 & Oct. 7, 2014) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PET ITION DENIED
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 21

- 1625 Filed December 21, 2022

MICHAEL EARL HILSON , Applicant

- Appellant,

vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent

- Appellee.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Samantha J. Gronewald , Judge.

Michael Earl Hilson appeals the dismissal of his third application for postconviction relief. AFFIRMED.

Debra S. De Jong of De Jong Law Firm, P.C. , Orange City , for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Linda J. Hines , Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State.

Considered by Bower, C.J., and Greer and Badding, JJ.2

BOWER , Chief Judge
. In 2010, Michael Earl Hilson was convicted of first

- degree burglary and third

- degree sexual abuse. His conviction was affirmed by this court in 2013. State v. Hilson , No. 10

- 0665, 2013 WL 541621, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Feb. 13, 2013). He filed an application for postconviction relief ( PCR ) , the denial of which was affirmed by th is court. Hilson v. State , No. 15

- 0679, 2016 WL 6652329, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2016) . His second application for PCR relief was dismissed. See Hilson v. State , No. 18

- 2189, 2020 WL 2060300, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Apr. 29, 2020). On August 10, 2021, Hilson filed a third application for PCR , asserting actual innocence, newly

- discovered evidence, and ineffective assistance of counsel

. Some issues raised by Hilson were raised and decided in the earlier PCR

cases. See Clark v. State , 955 N.W.2d 459, 464 (Iowa 2021) ( noting the doctrine of “ is sue preclusion prevents parties from relitigating issues already raised and resolved in a prior action” )

. The evidence relating to his remaining claims could have been discovered and raised within the limitations period of Iowa Code section
822.3 (2021) , and therefore the claims are time

- barred

. 1 We affirm without further

1 Iowa Code section 822.3 sets a three

- year limitations period: [ PCR ] a pplications must be filed within three years from the date the conviction or decision is final or, in the event of an appeal, from the date the writ of procedendo is issued. However, this limitation does not apply to a ground of fact or law that could not have been raised within the applicable time period. For purposes of this section, a ground of fact includes the results of DNA profiling ordered pursuant to an application filed under section 81.10.3

opinion. Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(1)(e) (“ A full opinion would not augment or clarify existing case law. ”). 2
AFFIRMED.

2 The State raised a jurisdictional question about the timeliness of Hilson’s appeal. We consider his post

- ruling motions to be akin to a motion under Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 1.904(2), extending the jurisdictional deadline to thirty days after the court’s ruling on the motion. Hilson’s notice of appeal was filed within the extended time.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

HAROLD FRANKLIN WALTERS, ) 

Petitioner, ) 

CIVIL ACTION 10-0131-CG-M 

v. ) 

CRIMINAL ACTION 05-0145-CG-M 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

Respondent. ) 

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT be entered in favor 

of Respondent, the United States of America, and against Petitioner Harold Franklin Walters. 

The court further finds that Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability; therefore, he 

is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. 

DONE and ORDERED this 11th day of June, 2010.

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:05-cr-00145-CG-M Document 52 Filed 06/11/10 Page 1 of 1
#### LOCKHEED MARTIN TACTICAL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant, v. Richard J. DANZIG, Secretary of the Navy, Appellee.

No. 00-1384.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: May 3, 2001.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 3, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

_______________

Nos. 3D18-2557 and 3D19-681

Lower Tribunal No. 14-17706

________________

American Sales and Management Organization LLC d/b/a Eulen 

America,

Appellant/Appellee,

vs.

Juan Carlos Alvarez,

Appellee/Appellant.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William 

Thomas, Judge.

Holland & Knight LLP, and Joseph J. Mamounas, Christopher N. 

Bellows, Anthony J. Sirven, and Manuel A. Miranda, for appellant/appellee.

Avila Rodriguez Hernandez Mena & Ferri LLP, and Wilfredo A. 

Rodriguez and Marisol Vilasuso, for appellee/appellant.

Before EMAS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and LINDSEY, JJ. 

PER CURIAM. 

Affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kim Rodney FARR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-7655.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 17, 2001.

Decided May 22, 2001.

Rodney Farr, pro se. Kenneth Michel Smith, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, NC, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Kim Rodney Farr seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court.*
      *See United States v. Farr,*Nos. CR-99-4; CA-00-493-3-T (WD.N.C. filed Nov. 3, 2000; entered Nov. 9, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

We recently held in *United States v. Sanders,*247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.2001), that the new rule announced in *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. Accordingly, Farr’s *Apprendi*claim is not cognizable.
Exhibit
32








SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350





I, Dennis
W. Doll, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the periodic report
being filed herewith containing financial statements fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that information contained in said periodic
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Middlesex Water Company for the period covered by said
periodic report.








/s/ Dennis W.
      DollDennis
      W. DollChief
      Executive Officer








Date:  March
13, 2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Middlesex Water Company and will be retained by Middlesex Water Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
PMI Fully-Toleranced Test Case 10 - View A

Includes Atomic Test Cases - N/A

 Models - 2014

Rev B

nist_ftc_10_asme1_rb

SPECIFIED):

EV. __ IS

RODUCT

MENSIONS

FINED ON

DENCE

DEFINED BY

THER

THE MODEL.

BASIC

S

TO

ATUM

 TO

ANCING.

NDICATED

TH THE

TS BOTTOM.

OT CONTACT

ED HOLES.

TO ALL

S.

Feature and Specification Index

nist_ftc_10_asme1_rb_fsi.pdf
PMI Fully-Toleranced Test Case 10 - View B

Includes Atomic Test Cases - 56, 60, 65, 70, 78, 86, 93

 Models - 2014

Rev B

nist_ftc_10_asme1_rb
PMI Fully-Toleranced Test Case 10 - View C

Includes Atomic Test Cases - 51, 56, 63, 86, 91

 Models - 2014

Rev B

nist_ftc_10_asme1_rb
PMI Fully-Toleranced Test Case 10 - View D

Includes Atomic Test Cases - 79

 Models - 2014

Rev B

nist_ftc_10_asme1_rb
PMI Fully-Toleranced Test Case 10 - View E

Includes Atomic Test Cases - 63, 91

 Models - 2014

Rev B

nist_ftc_10_asme1_rb
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          30,887
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,918
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,796)
<INVENTORY>                                    111,372
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               263,257
<PP&E>                                         174,688
<DEPRECIATION>                                (74,609)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 731,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          117,780
<BONDS>                                        399,507
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,515
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   (146,065)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   731,932
<SALES>                                        324,889
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               324,889
<CGS>                                          203,059
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  203,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                81,035
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,020
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,112)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  9,363
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,475)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>