alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Micro General Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
No. 33-22240, No. 2-85485 and No. 2-92490 on Form S-8 of Micro General
Corporation (the Company) of our report dated March 6, 1997, relating to the
balance sheets of Micro General Corporation as of December 31, 1996 and
December 31, 1995 and the related statements of operations, shareholders'
equity and cash flows in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996 and
the related schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 1996 annual
report on Form 10-K of Micro General Corporation.

Our report, dated March 6, 1997, contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has
 limited working capital resources which raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern.  The financial statements and
financial statement schedule do not include any adjustments that might result
from the outcome of that uncertainty.



/s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



Orange County, California
March 28, 1997
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CYNTHIA FAIR, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-0775-CG-L

)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED,

and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff benefits be

reversed and remanded to the Social Security Administration, see Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89,

111 S.Ct. 2157 (1991), for further proceeding consistent with this report and recommendation.

The remand pursuant to sentence four of § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §

405(g), makes the plaintiff a prevailing party under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §2412,

see Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 113 S. Ct. 2625 (1993), and terminates this court’s

jurisdiction over this matter except the court may consider issues related to fees and costs due and

owing to the plaintiff because plaintiff is a prevailing party under the EAJA, and in the future such fees

and costs which plaintiff’s counsel may be entitled to recover pursuant to the Social Security Act if

plaintiff is awarded benefits.

DONE and ORDERED this 30th day of June, 2005. 

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-00775-CG-D Document 15 Filed 06/30/05 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4891 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4891

               For the relief of Maria Cristina Degrassi.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2004

  Mr. Lantos introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Maria Cristina Degrassi.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MARIA CRISTINA DEGRASSI.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Maria Cristina Degrassi 
shall be eligible for issuance of immigrant visas or for adjustment of 
status to that of aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of immigrant visas under section 204 
of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Maria Cristina Degrassi enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
the alien shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of immigrant 
visas or the application for adjustment of status are filed with 
appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of this 
Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of 
immigrant visas or permanent residence to Maria Cristina Degrassi, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by the 
appropriate number, during the current or next following fiscal year, 
the total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives 
of the country of the aliens' birth under section 203(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the aliens' birth under section 202(e) of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY )

COMPANY, an insurance company )

incorporated in the State of Iowa;, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-0816-CG-M

)

HOGG ENGINEERING CORPORATION; )

DONALD RAY HOGG, JR; MEXIA )

WATER SYSTEM, INC., )

)

Defendants.

FINAL JUDGMENT

This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and brief in support.

(Docs. 23 & 24). Any party opposing the motion was ordered to file a response in opposition on or

before June 20, 2005. (Doc. 26). On June 28, 2005, after receiving no opposition, the court entered

an order viewing the defendants’ non-response as an oversight, and granting defendants an extension

until July 5, 2005, to file their opposition. (Doc. 27). The court further stated that “[i]f no opposition is

filed, the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is deemed granted without further order from the

court and final judgment will be entered accordingly.” (Doc. 27). To date, no response has been filed. 

Accordingly, the court finds that final judgment is due to be entered in favor of plaintiff.

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that final judgment in this case is

hereby entered against defendants, Hogg Engineering Corporation, Donald Ray Hogg, Jr. and Mexia

Water Systems, Inc., and in favor of plaintiff, Employers Mutual Casualty Company . The court

Case 1:04-cv-00816-CG-M Document 29 Filed 08/23/05 Page 1 of 2
2

DECLARES the following:

1. All of the allegations in the underlying action against Hogg Engineering

and/or Donald Ray Hogg, Jr. arise out of the rendering of or failure to

render professional services.

2. EMCC does not have a duty to defend and/or indemnify Donald Ray

Hogg, Jr. and/or Hogg Engineering, Corp. for the claims asserted

against them in the underlying action pending in the Circuit Court of

Monroe County, Alabama identified as Mexia Water System, Inc. v.

Hogg Engineering Corporation, Donald Ray Hogg, Jr. et. al., docket

number CV 04-88.

3. EMCC is not required to satisfy any judgment entered against Donald

Ray Hogg, Jr. and/or Hogg Engineering, Corp. in said underlying

action.

DONE and ORDERED this 23rd day of August, 2005. 

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-00816-CG-M Document 29 Filed 08/23/05 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-QSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 9-30-96 FOR USA INTERNATIONAL CHEMICAL, INC. AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000840399
<NAME> USA INTERNATIONAL CHEM
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             398
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,156
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                     274,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       398
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (14,930)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,930)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1401 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1401

 To require the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 
regularly review and update policies and manuals related to inspections 
                           at ports of entry.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2023

 Mr. Guest (for himself, Mr. Trone, Mr. Ezell, Ms. Craig, Mrs. Chavez-
DeRemer, Mrs. Lee of Nevada, Mr. Tony Gonzales of Texas, and Ms. Titus) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 
regularly review and update policies and manuals related to inspections 
                           at ports of entry.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eradicating Narcotic Drugs and 
Formulating Effective New Tools to Address National Yearly Losses of 
life Act'' or the ``END FENTANYL Act''.

SEC. 2. ENSURING TIMELY UPDATES TO U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION 
              FIELD MANUALS.

    (a) In General.--Not less frequently than triennially, the 
Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall review and 
update, as necessary, the current policies and manuals of the Office of 
Field Operations related to inspections at ports of entry to ensure the 
uniform implementation of inspection practices that will effectively 
respond to technological and methodological changes designed to 
disguise illegal activity, such as the smuggling of drugs and humans, 
along the border.
    (b) Reporting Requirement.--Shortly after each update required 
under subsection (a), the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection shall submit a report to the Committee on Homeland Security 
and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Homeland 
Security of the House of Representatives that summarizes the policy and 
manual changes implemented by such update.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4902 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4902

To extend the temporary increase in payments under the Medicare Program 
          for home health services furnished in a rural area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2004

Mr. Walden of Oregon (for himself, Mr. Pomeroy, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, 
   Mr. Burr, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Kind, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. McHugh, Mr. 
   McIntyre, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Nethercutt, Mr. Peterson of 
Pennsylvania, Mr. Ryun of Kansas, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Shuster, Mr. Towns, 
    Mr. Boucher, Mr. Lucas of Oklahoma, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. Bass, Mr. 
Sandlin, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Renzi, Mr. Hefley, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, 
  Mr. Ross, Mr. Ney, Mrs. Emerson, and Mr. Alexander) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 
 and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period 
    to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary increase in payments under the Medicare Program 
          for home health services furnished in a rural area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Rural Home Health Services 
Improvement Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY MEDICARE PAYMENT INCREASE FOR 
              HOME HEALTH SERVICES FURNISHED IN A RURAL AREA.

    Section 421 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and 
Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173; 117 Stat. 2283; 42 
U.S.C. 1395fff note) is amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``one-year'' and 
        inserting ``temporary''; and
            (2) in subsection (a), by striking ``2005'' and inserting 
        ``2007''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 1999 and the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter and three months ended April 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1,000

<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                   FEB-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                                8,454
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         8,981
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      8,825
<PP&E>                                                1,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                         (792)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       17,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                (2,649)
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               (14)
<OTHER-SE>                                         (48,298)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       (17,694)
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       103
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1,610
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (1,507)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (1,507)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1,507)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.10)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert L. Demorest, Chief Executive Officer of MOCON, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MOCON, Inc.   Date: March 30, 2011  /s/   Robert L. DemorestRobert   L. DemorestChief   Executive Officer
FILE COPY

RE: Case No. 15-0037 DATE: 1/15/2015

COA #: 12-13-00344-CV TC#: CV-01271-12-3

STYLE: LOUIE LAWSON, REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CAROLYN BURNS

v. CITY OF DIBOLL, TEXAS

A petition for review was filed today in the above-styled

case. Respondent may file either a response, or a waiver of

response. If you file a waiver, the Court will not grant the

petition without first requesting a response. (Tex. R. App. P.

53.3) There is no fee for a response or a waiver.

MS. CATHY S. LUSK

CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 354

TYLER, TX 75702

o

r~ 

7s
Exhibit 32.2

 

**                                                THE MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY                                                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                                                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                                                      SECTION 906                                                                           OF THE                                                    SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the"Company") on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), theundersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects,the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to The MonarchCement Company and will be retained by The MonarchCement Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

Dated:  March 14, 2008

                                                                                           /s/ Debra P. Roe                                                                                                                       Debra P. Roe, CPA                                                                                            Chief Financial Officer and                                                                                            Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
#### John M. Brower v. Andrew J. Edson.

*Gontributoi'y negligence.*

In an action for damages by negligence a charge permitting the jury to consider the question whether plaintiff did not contribute thereto, is error where there is no proof that he did not exercise due care.

Error to Allegan.

Submitted Oct. 12.

Decided Oct. 19.

Case. Plaintiff brings error.

Reversed.

*Jacob V. Rogers*for plaintiff in error.

A charge is error if based on a hypothesis unsupported by evidence: *Chadwick v. Butler*28 Mich. 349; *Moynahan v. Connor*30 Mich. 136.

*Stafford*c6 *Tomlinson*for defendant in error.

Graves, J.

The ground of this action is that Edson undertook to have his horse serve Brown’s mare and that Edson managed his horse so unskilfully and negligently that the mare received an injury from the horse of which she died. Under the charge of the court the jury returned a verdict in favor of Edson.

The only conflict in the testimony was whether the entry was of the *anus*or not, the plaintiff’s testimony tending to show that it was, and that of defendant to show that it was not. All agreed that there were three leaps, but defendant and his witnesses testified that the first two were ineffectual and not followed by any penetration, whilst the last was entirely perfect and satisfactory. There was no room for saying that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, because there was no proof that he was negligent and the circumstances indicated that he used due care. Hence the matters for the jury to discuss *were*— First, whether the entry was of the anus, as claimed by the plaintiff; and if so, second, whether it was the result of negligence gr want of *92skill by the defendant; and if it was, then *third,*whether the mare’s death was caused thereby.

A n affirmative finding on these propositions would have entitled the plaintiff to a recovery of his just damages. The plaintiff’s requests were properly refused. The series of requests made by the defendant and given by the court, and a part of the general charge, were misleading, because they assumed that certain matters were pertinent which were not so, and that it was an open question on the testimony whether the plaintiff exercised due care.

The judgment must be reversed with costs and a new 'trial granted.

The other Justices concurred.