alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT**

**TO SECTION 1350**

**(furnished, not filed)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warrior Energy Services Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William L. Jenkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                                                                                                                    |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ William L. Jenkins                                                                                                  |   |   |   |
|  

 

 

William L. JenkinsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 9, 2006

 

 

  |
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 485

To provide for a Federal program to stabilize medical malpractice insurance 

premiums. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2003

Mr. PALLONE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To provide for a Federal program to stabilize medical 

malpractice insurance premiums.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Medical Mal5 practice Insurance Stabilization Act of 2003 ’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FEDERAL PROGRAM TO STABILIZE MEDICAL MAL7 PRACTICE INSURANCE PREMIUMS. 

8 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of Health and 

9 Human Services shall establish and oversee a program 

10 under which insurance companies and other underwriters 
2

•HR 485 IH 

1 offering medical malpractice insurance coverage in the 

2 United States reinsure all claims in excess of $250,000 

3 through automatic reinsurance from a national fund that 

4 would be available to such companies and underwriters in 

5 order to provide stability in the market for medical mal6 practice insurance coverage. 

7 (b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary shall 

8 establish the terms and conditions of such a program, in9 cluding the premium amount to be charged for such rein10 surance.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28747]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Special Topic: Small Business Innovative Immunology Research.
    Date: December 18, 2014.
    Time: 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Andrea Keane-Myers, BS, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4218, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
435-1221, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b3a353f293e3a75303e3a353e7636223e29281b353233753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b2d3dcd6c0d7d39cd9d7d3dcd79fdfcbd7c0c1f2dcdbda9cd5ddc4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: December 3, 2014.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-28747 Filed 12-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               1,548
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,376,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                       309,580
<INVENTORY>                                        750,705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,904,599
<PP&E>                                           4,619,311
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,368,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,179,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,623,815
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         13,500
<COMMON>                                            17,876
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,167,187
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,179,305
<SALES>                                         12,304,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,304,599
<CGS>                                            7,165,648
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,165,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,646,849
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 373,235
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    492,102
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                118,867
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       118,867
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .00
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                          36,965
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,098
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (866)
<INVENTORY>                                     14,676
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,347
<PP&E>                                          73,057
<DEPRECIATION>                                (33,727)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,473
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,938
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,095
<SALES>                                        167,831
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               167,831
<CGS>                                          127,089
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  165,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,825
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   176
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,190)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,950)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,721)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,229)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (5,635)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,864)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.04)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DARRELL WILLIAMS, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-697-KD-N

 )

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated June 17, 2010, is ADOPTED as the opinion

of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States

District Court for the Middle District of Alabama.

DONE and ORDERED this the 27th day of July 2010.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00697-KD-N Document 16 Filed 07/27/10 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                              NASH-FINCH COMPANY
                             PROFIT SHARING PLAN
                                 1994 REVISION

                        FIFTH DECLARATION OF AMENDMENT


Pursuant to the retained power of amendment contained in Section 11.2 of 
the instrument entitled "Nash-Finch Company Profit Sharing Plan -- 1994 
Revision," the undersigned hereby amends Section 8.1 of said instrument 
by substituting "$5000" for "$3500" each place it appears therein.

The foregoing amendment is effective as of January 1, 1998.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be 
executed by its duly authorized officers and its corporate seal to be 
affixed hereto this 24th day of February, 1998.

                                       NASH FINCH COMPANY



Attest:     /s/ NORMAN R. SOLAND       By:     /s/ ALFRED N. FLATEN
        ----------------------------       ----------------------------
                Secretary                          President
Document #102 Recommendations for Competency Testing 

of Noncertified Latent Print Examiners (Latent) – Position 

Statement, Ver. 4.0

Date of First Issue 10/4/04 Current Issue Date 11/19/12

Web Posting Date 11/24/12

Date of Last Review N/A Date of Next Review N/A Appendix present/Letter No

1 of 2

Document #102

Recommendations for Competency Testing 

of Noncertified Latent Print Examiners

(Latent)

Position Statement

The SWGFAST document “Standards for minimum qualifications and training to competency for friction ridge 

examiner trainees” delineates the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary to be considered trained to 

competency. SWGFAST recognizes the need for a standard test available to the general latent print community 

that accurately assesses the competency of individuals to perform latent print casework. This would be 

appropriate at the completion of a training program before conducting casework, for latent print examiners who 

have not yet had sufficient work experience for certification, or in other situations in which it would be appropriate 

to assess the competency of latent print examiners.

A proctored, validated, two-part test should be developed that will determine competency, based on the following:

• A demonstration of knowledge in the form of a written test. The written portion of the test should conform 

to the required objectives in the SWGFAST document “Standards for minimum qualifications and training 

to competency for friction ridge examiner trainees”.

• A demonstration of skills in the form of a comparison test consisting of individualizations and exclusions 

of latent print impressions. The comparison portion of the test should conform to the guidelines of the 

American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors / Laboratory Accreditation Board for proficiency testing.

Friction ridge examiners are encouraged to aspire toward a professional certification program.
Document #102 Recommendations for Competency Testing 

of Noncertified Latent Print Examiners (Latent) – Position 

Statement, Ver. 4.0

Date of First Issue 10/4/04 Current Issue Date 11/19/12

Web Posting Date 11/24/12

Date of Last Review N/A Date of Next Review N/A Appendix present/Letter No

2 of 2

Revision Table

Version Effective Start Effective End Posted Archived Change

3.0 10/14/04 11/19/12 10/14/04 11/19/12 Original Issue

4.0 11/19/12 N/A 11/24/12 N/A No change to content

Reformatted (start of new

version number
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JERRY GRANT FRYE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-16188 

D.C. No. 4:14-cv-05470-YGR 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 24, 2017**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, 

Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Jerry Grant Frye appeals pro se from the district 

court’s judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims 

arising out of his criminal conviction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

FILED

MAY 31 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 16-16188 

§ 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 

Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Frye’s action challenging his 

continuing confinement as barred under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). 

See id. at 481-86 (habeas corpus is the exclusive remedy for a state prisoner who 

challenges the fact or duration of his confinement and seeks immediate or speedier 

release or damages arising from his allegedly unconstitutional conviction or 

confinement). Because the district court did not specify whether the dismissal of 

Frye’s action was with or without prejudice, we treat the dismissal as being 

without prejudice. See Trimble v. City of Santa Rosa, 49 F.3d 583, 585 (9th Cir. 

1995) (dismissals under Heck are without prejudice).

The district court properly dismissed Frye’s original complaint because it 

failed to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), included claims that were Heckbarred, and failed to identify how defendants’ conduct caused Frye’s alleged 

constitutional injuries. See McHenry v. Renne, 84 F.3d 1172, 1179-80 (9th Cir. 

1996) (complaint must forth simple, concise and direct averments as required 

under Rule 8(a)(2)); Heck, 512 U.S. at 481-86; Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 

(9th Cir. 1989) (liability under a § 1983 claim arises “only upon a showing of 

personal participation by the defendant”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Frye’s motions for 
 3 16-16188 

appointment of counsel. See Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) 

(setting forth standard of review and exceptional circumstances requirement for 

appointment of counsel).

We do not consider documents not filed with the district court. See United 

States v. Elias, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts not 

presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 10.8

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT is entered into as of this 7 day of December, 2005, by and
between Oriens Life Sciences (Israel) Ltd., a private company duly registered in
Israel (the "Company"), and Ms. Tamar Tzaban-Nahomov (the "Executive").

WHEREAS the Executive currently serves in the role of Chief Financial Officer
("CFO") of the Company, pursuant to an Employment Agreement dated October 30,
2005 (the "Agreement"; all capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement); and

WHEREAS the Company and the Executive both wish to continue the Executive's
employment as CFO of the Company, under the terms and conditions set forth
herein.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and
agreements herein contained, the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows:

      1.    The Executive shall continue to serve as the CFO of the Company and
            of the Parent Company, and perform all duties of a CFO for the
            Company and the Parent Company.

      2.    From and after December 1, 2005 (the "Effective Date"), the
            Executive's gross monthly Salary for performing the duties of CFO
            for the Company and the Parent Company shall be US$ 8,000. To
            prevent any doubt, the Executive shall not be entitled to any
            additional compensation for duties performed on behalf of the Parent
            Company.

      3.    Any provision of the Agreement not specifically amended herein shall
            remain unaffected in effect and in force, mutatis mutandis.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Amendment, effective as
of the date first written above.

ORIENS LIFE SCIENCES (ISRAEL) LTD.              EXECUTIVE


Per: Amnon Presler                              /s/ Tamar Tzaban-Nahomov
     ------------------------------             ------------------------
                                                Tamar Tzaban-Nahomov
Name: Amnon Presler
      -----------------------------

Title: Chief Executive Officer
       ----------------------------


                                      -7-
Exhibit 32.2

                              CNB BANCORP, INC.

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CNB Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
George A. Morgan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.




By /s/ George A. Morgan
-----------------------------------------
George A. Morgan, Chief Financial Officer


May 9, 2005
11054.

#### Central of Georgia Railway Co. *v.*Mansfield Trading Co.

Decided July 14, 1920.

Action for damages; from Newton superior court — Judge Hutcheson. October 11, 1919.

*Rogers & Knox,*for plaintiff in error.

*King & Johnson,*contra.

Luke, J.

Several of the exceptions to interlocutory rulings in this case were not preserved by exceptions pendente lite, and therefore can not be considered. Likewise, numerous grounds of the motion for a new trial are not specifically argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and must therefore be treated as abandoned. The assignment of error upon the court’s refusal to grant a nonsuit will not be considered, since the case proceeded to judgment and the motion for a new trial contained the ground that the verdict was not authorized by the evidence.

After a thorough examination of the voluminous record, and a careful consideration of all the assignments of error that are properly before this court, we find none that requires a new trial. The evidence authorized the verdict; the charge of the court was full and fair; and for no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Broyles, *C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

369 

CA 16-01489 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

JOHN PESTILLO, CLAIMANT-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

COUNTY OF MONROE, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, 

ET AL., RESPONDENT. 

MICHAEL E. DAVIS, COUNTY ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (MATTHEW D. BROWN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

WILLIAM MATTAR, P.C., WILLIAMSVILLE (JOHN ABEEL OF COUNSEL), FOR

CLAIMANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Ann

Marie Taddeo, J.), entered December 8, 2015. The order, insofar as

appealed from, granted the application of claimant for leave to serve

a late notice of claim on respondent County of Monroe. 

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance

signed by the attorneys for the parties on January 13, 2017,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: March 24, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

TOMMIE L. CATLEDGE, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00606-KD-N 

 ) 

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) 

Commissioner of Social Security, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

ORDER 

 After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to 

the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 626(b)(1)(B) and dated July 28, 2010 is 

ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court and the decision of the Commissioner of Social 

Security denying plaintiff’s benefits is REVERSED and REMANDED. 

 This remand makes the plaintiff a prevailing party for purposes of the Equal 

Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and terminates this Court’s jurisdiction over this 

matter. 

 Done this 13th day of August, 2010. 

 s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

 KRISTI K. DUBOSE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:09-cv-00606-KD-N Document 20 Filed 08/13/10 Page 1 of 1