alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.15



FY 2006 SurModics Bonus Plan-Executive
Officers



I.  Consists of two parts



A.  Corporate
objectives, and


	B.  
	 	Business Unit or Department objectives






II.  Corporate Bonus Payout structure (stated as
% of base salary)




	CEO
 	 	FY 2006 Revenue
	   

	
	
	
	   
	
	   
	Level I
	   
	Level II
	   
	Level III

	FY
	    	    	    	Level I
	    	    	12	%  	    	    	16	%  	    	    	24	%  
	2006
	    	    	    	Level II
	    	    	16	%  	    	    	28	%  	    	    	32	%  
	EPS
	    	    	    	Level III
	    	    	24	%  	    	    	32	%  	    	    	40	%  




 





	Senior Staff
 	 	FY 2006 Revenue
	   

	(excluding CEO)
	
	Level I
	   
	Level II
	   
	Level III
	   

	FY
	    	    	    	Level I
	    	    	9	%  	    	    	12	%  	    	    	18	%  
	2006
	    	    	    	Level II
	    	    	12	%  	    	    	21	%  	    	    	24	%  
	EPS
	    	    	    	Level III
	    	    	18	%  	    	    	24	%  	    	    	30	%  




 




The Level I,
Level II, and Level III performance levels are as set by the Organization & Compensation Committee for FY 2006.



III.  Business Unit or Department
objectives



A.  Objectives
identified by Senior Staff member and approved by CEO



B.  One objective for
Business Units will be revenue



C.  All objectives must
be detailed and measurable


	IV.  
	 	No bonus payout unless both Revenue and EPS meet at least Level
I corporate objective, whether or not Business Unit or Department objectives are met.





	V.  
	 	Composition of Total Bonus Payout






1.   Senior Staff
except CEO: 75% corporate + 25% Business Unit/Department



2.  CEO: will receive
100% corporate bonus only and no Business Unit/Department component














3.  Executive Chairman
is not bonus eligible


	Example:  
	 	If corporate Level II revenue and Level III EPS are met, then
Senior Staff member gets 24% corporate bonus. If all Business Unit/Department goals are also met for such Senior Staff member, then that person gets an
additional 8% bonus, for a total bonus payout of 32% (75% corporate, 25% Business Unit)
#### McGoldrick et al. *v.*Slevin et al.

APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Civil Circuit Court.

*H. W. Chase*and *J. A. Wilstach,*for appellants.

A. *A. Huff, B. W. Langdon,*and *J.*A. *Pettit,*for'appellees.

Pettit, J.

The title given to this case in the assignment of errors is *Margaret McGoldrick et al.*v. *James Slevin et al.,*while the appellants and appellees are numerous (six of the former and four of the latter). The appeal must be dismissed for not complying with rule first of this court, in not setting out the full names of all the parties.

The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of appellants.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CARLA FOREMAN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-0487-CG-M

)

AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, )

INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the defendant's amended answer to plaintiff's amended

complaint, in which the defendant represents that it obtained the consent of the opposing party to

file the amendment. The court notes that the amendment was filed outside the time allowed by

the Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order (Doc. 19) issued on October 15, 2009, which was November

13, 2009.

Mere stipulation by the parties is insufficient to extend a deadline in federal court. See,

e.g., Orange Theatre Corp. V. Rayherstz Amusement Corp., 130F.2d 185, 187(3d Cir. 1942)

(rules of civil procedure require court approval to effectuate a stipulation extending time to

answer); In re Lease Oil Antitrust Litigation No. II, 48 F.Supp.2d 699, 707 (S.D.Tex.1998)

(same). The court -- and not the litigants -- controls the timetable of this litigation. Had the

parties desired an extension of time, their only recourse was to petition the court. Neither

plaintiff nor any other federal litigant is empowered to grant unilateral extensions of filing

deadlines imposed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Nevertheless, the court will construe the parties’ stipulation to be a motion to file the

amended answer out of time, and hereby GRANTS such motion. The parties are warned that

Case 1:09-cv-00487-CG-M Document 22 Filed 01/19/10 Page 1 of 2
any similar pleading filed in the future will be stricken from the record.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of January, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00487-CG-M Document 22 Filed 01/19/10 Page 2 of 2
SAFE-NET: A Computing Platform for Public Safety Applications 

Khaled AbdelghanySouthern Methodist University

E-mail: khaled@smu.edu

Barbara MinskerSouthern Methodist University

E-mail: minsker@smu.edu

Michael HahslerSouthern Methodist University

E-mail: mhahsler@smu.edu

May YuanUniversity of Texas at DallasE-mail: myuan@utdallas.edu

There are increasing calls for developing descriptive, predictive, and prescriptive analytical tools using big datato enable informed and optimal decision making for public safety applications. 

These tools provide necessary intelligence and decision support capabilities including: - Estimation of missing information- Incident state prediction- Evaluation of response scheme alternatives to determine the optimal strategies

This research aims at accelerating public safety innovation through the development of SAFE-NET.

SAFE-NET is a novel computational platform to support efficient and safe dynamic mobilization of resources and personnel for emergency response. 

Q1: What data sources can be fused, and how can this fusion process be efficiently performed to provide accurate estimation of the time-varying roadway network conditions? 

Q2: What is the travelshed area (geofencing) for emergency vehicle routing, and how can the temp-spatial risk in this travelshed area be quantified? 

Q3: What is the most optimal route for an emergency vehicle taking into consideration the tradeoff between speed and safety requirements of the emergency vehicle dispatching process? 

Extractor/Aggregator

Extractor/Aggregator

Extractor/ Aggregator

Stream Fusion

Traffic State Predictor

Clo

ud C

ompu

ting

Infr

astr

uctu

re

Data Stream Sources

Streaming Machine Learning & Graph Mining

V2X

Geofencing

Risk assessment

Anticipatory routing

Social Media

By Pew Research Center Survey

Panorama image created from video 

Flood depth

Estimation (ft) Modeled (ft)

A 4.5 - 5.2 4.6 - 5.7B 6.5 - 7.2 5.5 - 7.22Building 

height 

A B 

A B 

3D reconstruction of Google Street View

Flood Prediction Example

Dynamically fence out high-risk street segments from dispatch routing at a given time. 

Conceptual framework for applying data mining (e.g. classification and regression techniques - CART) to elicit rules of site and situational characteristics for successful and unsuccessful dispatches on road segments.

• We present a novel algorithm which integrates thenetwork decomposition and link augmentationtechniques.

• The algorithm uses parallelization techniques toexpedite the computational time.Step1: Original Network Step2:  Partitioned Network

Step 4: Boundary to boundary SP computation Step 5: Computing SP in the 

travelshed area

Step 3: g SP within each sub-network
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                         |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                      |   |                         |   |
| Date: August 2, 2010 |   | /s/ Marguerite N. Duffy |   |
|                      |   | Marguerite N. Duffy          |   |
|                      |   | Senior Vice President and    |   |
|                      |   | Chief Financial Officer      |   |
|                      |   |                         |   |

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

***URANIUM RESOURCES,INC.***

405 State Highway 121 Bypass, Building A, Suite 110, Lewisville,TX 75067

972.219.3330 Phone 972.219.3311 Fax

 

November 9, 2009

 

Securities and ExchangeCommission

450 5th Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

 

I, Thomas H. Ehrlich,Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Uranium Resources, Inc.(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the period ended September 30, 2009 which thiscertification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| */s/* Thomas H. Ehrlich                     |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Thomas H. Ehrlich                           |   |
| Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |   |
| November 9, 2009                       |   |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Siebert Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Muriel F. Siebert, in my capacity as Chair and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1)    the Report filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the report. 

| /s/ Muriel F. Siebert |   | Date: April 4, 2005 |
|-----------------------|--------|---------------------|
| Muriel F. Siebert     |   |
| Chair and President   |   |

 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by section 906, has been provided to Siebert Financial Corp. and will be retained by Siebert Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Order entered December 29, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 20 - 00064 - CR LOUIS JAMES BROWN, III, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296 - 83597 - 2019

ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a reply brief . Appellant filed his motion after we informed him that the Court had receive d but did not file his reply brief because it was untimely and that the Court would not consider it without a motion for extension of time. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the appellant’s reply brief filed as of the date of this order

. /s/ KEN MOLBERG JU STICE
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: M ichelle Hartman v. Wayne Correll and Peggy Correll

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 5

- 00 415

- CV

Trial court case number: 2 0 12

- 387 56

Trial court: 151st District Court o f Harris County

This appeal was stayed pursuant to a n otice of b ankruptcy s tay , filed in this Court on May 27 , 201 5

, stating that a ppell ee /cross

- appellant

, Wayne Correll

, ha d filed , on May 20 , 201 5

, a petition for relief under Chapter 13 of Title 11, Unit ed States Code, in Case 1 5

- 3 2769 , in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.2 ; s ee also 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) (automatic stay in bankruptcy). Appellant/cross

- appellee Michelle Hartman has notified this Cou rt that the b ankruptcy case ha s been dismissed and provided a copy of the bankruptcy court’s “ Order Dismissing Case with Prejudice to Refiling Another Case for 180 Days,” signed and entered on August 2 0 , 201 5

. Accordingly, we reinstate the case on the Cour t’s docket. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.3(a).

The clerk’s record, received on June 9, 2015, and the reporter’s record (volume 7 of 10)

, received on July 10, 2015, are filed in this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.2.

The remainder of the reporter’s record is due to be filed within 30 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings



Date: September 15, 2015
Downloaded from www.Manualslib.com manuals search engine
Downloaded from www.Manualslib.com manuals search engine
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Morgans Foods, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
Rule 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
   Date: June 1, 2009
    /s/ Leonard R. Stein-SapirLeonard R. Stein-SapirChairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer 48
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BETTY SHINN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) Civil Action No. 08-0444-CG-N

)

CITY OF MOBILE, )

 )

Defendant. )

JUDGMENT

 In accordance with the court’s memorandum opinion and order entered this date, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that JUDGMENT be and is hereby entered in favor

of defendant City of Mobile, and against plaintiff, Betty Shinn. Therefore, all plaintiff’s claims

are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Costs are to be taxed against the plaintiff.

DONE and ORDERED this the 19th day of February, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-00444-CG-N Document 67 Filed 02/19/10 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned Directors and Officers of Millipore Corporation (the
Corporation), do hereby constitute and appoint Martin D. Madaus, Charles F. Wagner, Jr. and Jeffrey Rudin and each of them individually, their true and lawful attorneys and agents to execute on behalf of the Corporation the Form 10-K
Annual Report of the Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, and all such amendments or additional instruments related thereto which such attorneys and agents may deem to be necessary and desirable to enable the Corporation to
comply with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any regulations, orders, or other requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder in connection with the preparation and filing of
said documents, including specifically, but without limitation of the foregoing, power and authority to sign the names of each of such Directors and Officers on his behalf, as such Director or Officer, as indicated below to the said Form 10-K Annual
Report or documents filed or to be filed as a part of or in connection with such Form 10-K Annual Report; and each of the undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that said attorneys and agents shall do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.



|                                                 |  |          |  |                  
|------------------------------------------------ |  | -------- |  | -----------------
|Signature                                        |  | Title    |  | Date             
|                                                 |  |         
|/S/    MARTIN D.
MADAUS Martin D. Madaus         |  | Director |  | February 14, 2008
|                                                 |  |         
|/S/    DANIEL
BELLUS Daniel Bellus               |  | Director |  | February 14, 2008
|                                                 |  |         
|/S/    ROBERT C.
BISHOP Robert C. Bishop         |  | Director |  | February 14, 2008
|                                                 |  |         
|/S/    MELVIN D.
BOOTH Melvin D. Booth           |  | Director |  | February 14, 2008
|                                                 |  |         
|/S/    ROLF
CLASSON Rolf Classon                 |  | Director |  | February 14, 2008
|                                                 |  |         
|/S/    MAUREEN A.
HENDRICKS Maureen A. Hendricks |  | Director |  | February 14, 2008
|                                                 |  |         
|/S/    MARK
HOFFMAN Mark Hoffman                 |  | Director |  | February 14, 2008
|                                                 |  |         
|/S/    JOHN F.
RENO John F. Reno                 |  | Director |  | February 14, 2008
|                                                 |  |         
|/S/    EDWARD M.
SCOLNICK Edward M. Scolnick     |  | Director |  | February 14, 2008
|                                                 |  |         
|/S/    KAREN E.
WELKE Karen E. Welke             |  | Director |  | February 14, 2008
THE MIDLAND COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
	Exhibit (21) - Subsidiaries of the Registrant
		      December 31, 2000


	The subsidiaries of the Registrant as of December 31, 2000, all of which
are included in the consolidated financial statements, are as follows:

								   Percentage
						     State of       of Voting
						   Incorporation   Stock Owned
						   -------------   -----------
M/G Transport Services, Inc.                            Ohio            100
Midland - Guardian Co.                                  Ohio            100
MGT Services, Inc.                                      Ohio            100

SUBSIDIARIES OF MIDLAND - GUARDIAN CO.:
American Modern Insurance Group, Inc.                   Ohio            100
Marbury Agency, Inc.                                    Ohio            100

SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN MODERN INSURANCE GROUP, INC.:
American Modern Home Insurance Company                  Ohio            100
American Family Home Insurance Company                Florida           100
American Modern Life Insurance Company                  Ohio            100
Lloyds Modern Corporation                              Texas            100
American Modern Home Service Company                    Ohio            100
Modern Services Group, Inc.                             Ohio            100

SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE CO.:
American Modern Lloyds Insurance Company               Texas            100
American Southern Home Insurance Company              Florida           100
American Western Home Insurance Company               Oklahoma          100
G.U.I.C. Insurance Company                              Ohio            100

SUBSIDIARY OF AMERICAN WESTERN HOME INSURANCE CO.:
Modern Life Insurance Company of Arizona, Inc.        Arizona           100

SUBSIDIARY OF MODERN SERVICES GROUP, INC.:
Sunbelt General Agency, Inc.                          Alabama           100
The Atlas Insurance Agency, Inc.                        Ohio            100
Midwest Enterprises, Inc.                             Florida           100
Manufactured Homes Acceptance Corporation               Ohio            100
MHAC Insurance Agency, Inc.                             Ohio            100
Service Sentry Warranty Corporation                     Ohio            100
North American Insurance Agency Corporation           Michigan          100
AMH Insurance Agency of Georgia, Inc.                 Georgia           100

	The name of three wholly - owned subsidiaries of The Midland Company are
not shown above as such individual listing is not required.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

                   AFFIDAVIT AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT

         I, Kenneth F. Guarino, do depose and say that:

         1.  I am the legal and beneficial owner of all right, title and
interest in 100,000 shares of the common stock of Metro Global Media, Inc. (the
"Corporation"), which shares are presently held in the treasury of the Company;

         2.  My rights in said shares have not, in whole or in part, been
assigned, transferred, hypothecated, pledged or otherwise disposed of and that
I am entitled to full and exclusive possession of said shares;

         3.  This affidavit is made for the purpose of inducing the Corporation
to effect the re-issuance of the 100,000 shares in the treasury to the
undersigned; and

         4.  I hereby agree to indemnify and to hold the Corporation, its
officers, directors, agents, attorneys and employees, harmless from and against
any and all liabilities in respect of claims, suits, proceedings, damages,
judgments, settlements, expenses and costs (including, without limitation,
reasonable counsel fees) which the Corporation may suffer or incur by reason of
its re-issuing said shares to me, including, without limitation claims arising
with respect to the ownership of the shares issued hereby, or with respect to
the issuance and/or cancellation by the Corporation of Stock Certificate No.
1083.

                                                          /s/ Kenneth F. Guarino


Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3rd day of December, 1996.

                                                          /s/  Jennifer St. Cyr
                                                                Notary Public