alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Patrick T. Mooney, M.D., Chief Executive Officer and President, certify
that:



|1. |  | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Aphton
Corporation;
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report; and
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. |  | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 25, 2004
    
    Signature:
    
    /s/ Patrick T. Mooney, M.D.Patrick T. Mooney, M.D.
Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
Schedule of Change in Control Agreements



 EXHIBIT 10(a)(7) 
  
 SCHEDULE OF CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENTS 
  

			
	 	  	Term


	 H. P. Mechler
	  	12 months
	 J. Eric Story
	  	6 months
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>


<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>            MAR-31-2000

<CASH>                               6,999
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                        4,980
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                         36,386
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    48,365
<PP&E>                             315,413
<DEPRECIATION>                      46,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     358,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              113,878
<BONDS>                            343,472
<COMMON>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                        (215,661)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       358,062
<SALES>                             15,934
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    16,034
<CGS>                               12,633
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        1,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     2,296
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   8,006
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (8,450)
<INCOME-TAX>                         3,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (5,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                        (5,200)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (5.2)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (5.2)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Thomas G. Tachovsky, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of
Entropin, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 12, 2003

By:      /s/ Thomas G. Tachovsky, Ph.D.
         ------------------------------
         Thomas G. Tachovsky, Ph.D.
         President and Chief Executive Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Entropin, Inc. and will be
retained by Entropin, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request.






<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Patricia G. Kriss, Chief Financial Officer of Entropin, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 12, 2003

By:      /s/ Patricia G. Kriss
         -----------------------
         Patricia G. Kriss
         Chief Financial Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Entropin, Inc. and will be
retained by Entropin, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request.
Abatement Order filed December 10, 2013

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00888

- CR

____________ WILLIAM MARK RHODE S , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1259408



### ABATEMENT ORDER
The reporter’s record has not been filed in this appeal. The court reporter has informed the court that appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee to prepare the reporter’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c)(2)(A). Appellant asserts he is indigent. This court is unaware whether appellant is entitled to proceed without the payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c)(2)(B). Accordingly, we enter the following order. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c).We ORDER the judge of the 24 8th District Court to immediately conduct a

hearing at which appellant, appellant’s counsel, if any, and counsel for the State shall participate, either in person or by video teleconference, to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, a nd, if so, whether appellant is indigent and, thus entitled to a free record and appointed counsel on appeal. The judge may appoint appellate counsel for appellant if necessary. The judge shall see that a record of the hearing is made, shall make finding s of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward a record of the hearing and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. The transcribed record of the hearing, the court’s findings and conclusions, an d a videotape or compact disc, if any, containing a recording of the video teleconference shall be filed with the
clerk of this court on or before January 9 , 201 4

. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s
active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may r einstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this court’s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, th e court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAM
Director Compensation



 EXHIBIT 10.92 
  
 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 
 (NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR FEES) 
  
 The
following sets forth the fees and other payments that directors who are not employees of Franklin Resources, Inc. (“Franklin”) are entitled to receive as members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”). 
  
 Effective January 1, 2005, directors who are not Franklin employees are entitled to
receive $12,500 per quarter, plus $3,000 per meeting and expect to receive an annual stock grant valued at $75,000 (rounded up to the nearest whole share) on the date of the annual organizational meeting of the Board in each fiscal year. In addition
to a per committee meeting fee of $1,500 paid to directors who serve on Board committees, Chairpersons of the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee receive $1,250 per quarter and the Chairperson of the Audit Committee
receives $2,500 per quarter. In addition, the Company has a policy of reimbursing certain health insurance coverage for a director who is retired from other employment and is not otherwise eligible for group health coverage under Franklin’s
group health plan or any other company’s health plan. Franklin will reimburse the cost of health insurance coverage comparable to that provided to Franklin employees. The Company also reimburses directors for certain expenses incurred in
connection with attending Board and committee meetings and other company related events, including travel, hotel accommodations, meals and other incidental expenses. 
  
 Franklin also allows directors to defer payment of their directors’ fees, and to treat the deferred amounts as hypothetical investments
in Franklin common stock or Franklin Templeton mutual funds, as applicable. The terms of any such deferred payment arrangements are set forth in separate agreements or other documentation between Franklin and the particular directors.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-QSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, FOR USA INTERNATIONAL CHEMICAL AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,617
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,617
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,617
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,741
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                         863
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,617
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,848
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,848)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,848)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4769

Making a supplemental appropriation for the Department of Education for 

the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 7, 2004

Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California (for himself, Mr. KILDEE, Ms. WOOLSEY, 

Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr. KIND, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. 

PAYNE, Mr. KUCINICH, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. GRIJALVA, 

Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. CASE, Mr. HOLT, Mr. 

RYAN of Ohio, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. CONYERS, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. MEEKS of 

New York, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. DOGGETT, and Mr. ANDREWS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL

Making a supplemental appropriation for the Department 

of Education for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

2004, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Child Left Behind 

5 Appropriations Support Act of 2004’’. 
2

•HR 4769 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION. 

2 (a) APPROPRIATION.—To carry out this Act, out of 

3 any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, 

4 there is appropriated $237,000,000, to remain available 

5 until expended, for the Department of Education for the 

6 fiscal year ending September 30, 2004. 

7 (b) PAYMENTS.—In addition to amounts otherwise 

8 provided to a local educational agency under subpart 2 

9 of part A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Edu10 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6331 et seq.) for fiscal year 

11 2004, the Secretary of Education shall make a payment 

12 in an amount determined under subsection (c) to each 

13 local educational agency that receives a lesser amount of 

14 funds for fiscal year 2004 under such subpart than the 

15 agency received for fiscal year 2003. 

16 (c) DETERMINATION OF AMOUNT.—The amount of 

17 a payment to a local educational agency under this Act 

18 shall be equal to the amount of the difference between—

19 (1) the amount the agency would otherwise re20 ceive for fiscal year 2004 under subpart 2 of part 

21 A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Edu22 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6331 et seq.); and 

23 (2) the amount the agency received for fiscal 

24 year 2003 under such subpart. 

25 (d) DEFINITION.—In this Act, the term ‘‘local edu26 cational agency’’ has the meaning given to that term in 
3

•HR 4769 IH 

1 section 9101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education 

2 Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801).

Æ
1102, 1103.

#### LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY *v.*RICHIE; and *vice versa.*

There was evidence from which negligence on the part of the railroad company could be inferred by the jury; the question whether the consequences of such negligence could have been avoided by ordinary care *260on the part of the plaintiff was one of fact for the jury, and this court can not disturb their verdict.

Decided May 5, 1920.

Action, for damages; from city court of Cartersville — Judge Aubrey. August 30,1919. .

*Tye, Peeples & Tye, D.*W. *Blair, Neel, Finley & Neel,*for the railroad company.

*A.*W. *Fite, J. R. Whitaker, R. R. Arnold,*contra.

Smith, J.

This case has been tried three times, each trial resulting in a verdict for the plaintiff. Two of the verdicts were set aside by the court below on motion for a new trial, but the last motion for a new trial was overruled, and the defendant excepted and brought the case to this court for review. The grounds of the amended motion for a new trial amount to no more than an elaboration of the general grounds; and there being some evidence from which the jury could infer negligence on the part of the defendant railroad company, and whether the consequences of that negligence could have been avoided by the exercise of ordinary care on the part of the plaintiff being an issue of fact for their determination, and the trial judge having approved the verdict returned, this court is without power to interfere.

*<Judgment affirmed on main bill of exceptions; cross-bill dismissed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
Exhibit No. 24.

POWER OF ATTORNEY

We, the undersigned directors of Questar Gas Company, hereby severally constitute D. N. Rose and S. E. Parks, and each of them acting alone, our true and lawful
attorneys, with full power to them and each of them to sign for us, and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2002 and any and all
amendments to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Questar Gas Company, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by the attorneys appointed herein to the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2002 and any and all amendments to such Report.

Witness
our hands on the respective dates set forth below.

|Signature                               |  | Title                                        |  | Date   
|--------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------- |  | -------
|/s/R. D. CASHR. D. Cash                 |  | Chairman of the Board                        |  | 2-11-03
|/s/K. O. RATTIEK. O. Rattie             |  | Vice Chairman                                |  | 2-11-03
|/s/D. N. ROSED. N. Rose                 |  | President & Chief Executive Officer
Director |  | 2-11-03
|/s/W. WHITLEY HAWKINSW. Whitley Hawkins |  | Director                                     |  | 2-11-03
|/s/ROBERT E. KADLECRobert E. Kadlec     |  | Director                                     |  | 2-11-03
|/s/DIXIE L. LEAVITTDixie L. Leavitt     |  | Director                                     |  | 2-11-03
|/s/GARY G. MICHAELGary G. Michael       |  | Director                                     |  | 2-11-03
|/s/HARRIS H. SIMMONSHarris H. Simmons   |  | Director                                     |  | 2-11-03

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 23.2

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

We have issued our reports dated March 30, 2004, except for Notes 5 and 17, as to which the date is March 31, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Mestek, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Mestek, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-06429, effective July 9, 1996 and File No. 333-82067, effective July 1, 1999).

 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

 

Boston, Massachusetts

March 31, 2006
Exhibit
10.7D

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This
Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2005
("Amendment No.  2"), amends the
Employment Agreement, dated September 24, 2001, as amended by Amendment
No.  1 dated as of November 17, 2004 (the
"Employment Agreement"), between Sarah L.
Eames (the "Executive") and Allied Healthcare
International Inc., a New York corporation (the
"Company").

WHEREAS, the Executive and
the Company desire to amend the Employment Agreement in the manner
hereinafter set forth;

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto,
intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

1.    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the
Employment Agreement:

(a)    Effective
October  1, 2005, the Executive's base salary shall be at
the rate of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) per month, payable in
accordance with the Company's normal payroll practices.

(b)    The Term (as such term is defined in the
Employment Agreement) shall continue until December 31, 2006.

2.    Except as amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned have executed this Amendment No. 2 as of the date set forth
above.


		ALLIED HEALTHCARE INTERNATIONAL INC.





		By: /s/ C.F. Murphy

 Name: C.F. Murphy

Title: Chief Financial Officer





/s/ C.
Fedder

 Witness


		/s/ Sarah Ladd
Eames

 SARAH L EAMES





                        

Witness
11432.

#### HALL v. GEORGIA RAILROAD AND BANKING CO.

Decided July 14, 1920.

Injury to a railroad passenger, alleged to have been knocked to the ground by being bumped against by one of the passengers crowding up the steps of a car when she started to descend the steps at her destination, did not, under the allegations of the petitions in this case, constitute a cause of action against the railroad company, whose conductor, it was alleged, “either wilfully or forgetfully,” did not allow her sufficient time to alight from the train, but set a step on the ground and allowed passengers to crowd in the train as she was coining out.

Action for damages; from Columbia superior court—W. M. Howard, judge pro hac vice. February 20, 1920.

The petition alleged that “plaintiff was a passenger being transported on defendant’s train from Robinson to Grovetown. Plaintiff gave to the conductor her ticket reading from Robinson to Grovetown, and said conductor well knew that she was to get-off at Grovetown, and knew that she was riding with her infant child and a nurse. . . When the train upon which plaintiff was riding reached Grovetown plaintiff undertook to alight from said train as rapidly as possible and as was consistent with the safety of herself and child, but the said conductor either wilfully or forgetfully did not allow plaintiff sufficient time to alight from said train, but set the step on the ground and allowed passengers to crowd in said train, crowding up the steps just as she was *460coining out, and just as she started to descend the steps a passenger who, due to negligence of the said conductor, had been allowed to rush in said train, struck petitioner, bumping against her with great force and knocking her down the steps to the ground. Plaintiff sustained severe injuries by reason of said fall;” which injuries are described; wherefore she prays judgment against the defendant in the sum of $5,000.

*J. A. Beazley,*for plaintiff,

cited: Civil Code (1910), § 2780; 97 *Ga.*727; 76 *Ga.*311; 108 *Ga.*84; 117 *Ga.*63 (1); cases cited for defendant, infra, distinguished.

*Cumming & Harper,*for defendant,

cited: 217 Mass. 515 (105 N. E. 379, 51 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1152); 212 Mass. 307, 309 .(98 N. E. 1041); 227 Mass. 113 (116 N. E. 815); 260 Pa. 481 (104 Atl. 69); 115 *Ga.*837.

Luke, J.

The petition did not set out a cause of action and was properly dismissed on general demurrer. While the only demurrer sent up with the record is a special demurrer, the bill of exceptions and the judgment excepted to show that the petition was dismissed on a general, and not a special, demurrer; and this is conceded in the briefs of counsel for both parties. Counsel for the plaintiff in error says in his brief: “A general demurrer was filed to the petition and was sustained, and the only question presented to this court is whether the petition sets forth a cause of action.”

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*