alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1291

DAVERETTA A. HAYES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MASS TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-00- 3790-AMD) Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 18, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daveretta A. Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Jessie Lyons Crawford, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Daveretta A. Hayes appeals the district court’s order and order on reconsideration granting summary judgment to the Appellee in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hayes v. Mass Transit Admin. , No. CA-00-3790-AMD (D. Md. Jan. 22 & Feb. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Hunt, Adm’r, *v.*Price.

*Practice.—Preponderance of*Evidence.—The court below having seen the witnesses face to face, heard their evidence, perhaps knowing their characters for truth and veracity, and having seen and observed their willingness and readiness, or reluctance and hesitancy, in answering questions, the Supreme Court will not reverse its action in overruling a motion for a new trial on the question of the weight of evidence, there being evidence tending to support the finding of the jury.

APPEAL from the Ploward Common Pleas.

*M. Bell*and *A. S. Bell,*for appellant.

*C. D. Murray,*for appellee.

Pettit, J.

The appellee sued the appellant, to recover for work and labor done and services rendered by her to and for the appellant’s intestate in his lifetime, alleging that she had served him for twenty years with an understanding and agreement that she was to be paid for her services, and, further, that if she outlived him, he agreed to leave her his property. Proper issues were formed; trial by jury; verdict for plaintiff (appellee). Motion for a new trial overruled, and judgment on the verdict. The only question in the case is on the evidence. We may admit that if this was an original question before us as it appears in the record, we should not have found as the jury did, or ruled as the court did on the motion for a new trial; yet there is evidence which tends to show the right of the plaintiff below to recover, and on which the jury were justified in finding as they did, and the court in ruling as it did in overruling the motion for a new trial.

We cannot disturb the verdict or judgment. The reasons for this rule have so often been stated that it is hardly necessary to restate them. But we will say again that the jury and court below saw the witnesses face to face, heard their evidence, may have known their characters for truth and veracity, saw and observed their willingness, readiness, or reluctance and hesitancy in answering questions, which we cannot see, know, of judge of, as the written evidence is presented in the transcript.

The judgment is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant.
#### Knaube et al. *v.*Kerchner.

Mechanic’s Lien.—Pavement.—The making of a pavement, in front of a lot and abutting thereon, cannot be regarded, in any sense, as the “ construction or repair” of a building on such lot, within the meaning of the statute in regard to mechanics’ liens; and therefore a mechanic’s lien cannot be acquired for work done and materials furnished in the construction of such a pavement.

APPEAL from the Jennings Circuit Court.

Downey, J.

This was án action by the appellee against the appellants, to enforce a mechanic’s lien, and there was judgment in the circuit court for the plaintiff, from which the defendants appeal to this court. The errors assigned are, the overruling of a demurrer to the complaint, and the refusal to grant a new trial.

We need only examine the first error assigned. The question involved is this, as stated in the brief of counsel for the appellee: “Will a mechanic’s lien attach for work done and materials furnished in the erection and construction of a pavement in front of,-and abutting upon, a lot and *218building, as in this case?” The statute provides that mechanics and all persons performing labor or furnishing materials for the construction or repair of any building may have a lien. 2 G. & H. 298, sec. 647. We cannot regard the making of a pavement in front of a lot as, in any sense, either the construction or repair of a building, within the meaning of the statute, and must, therefore, hold that the demurrer to the complaint should have been sustained.

*y. D. New*and *A. G. Smith,*for appellants.

*y. Overmeyer*and *D. Overmeyer,*for appellee.

The'judgment is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded. . -
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Bio-Lok International Inc.(the
Registrant) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended July 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on September, 2003, hereof (the
Report), the undersigned officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 5 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. Bio-Lok International Inc. (s) Ingo K KozakChief Financial OfficerMarch 15, 2004
The National Career 

Clusters® provides the organizing structure for 

delivering quality CTE programs with 16 career clusters 

and 79+ pathways. 

Cybersecurity is most often included in the Information 

Technology Career Cluster.

nist.gov/nice

WhY CTE?

U.S. Department of 

Education, Office 

of Career, 

Technical, and 

Adult Education 

(OCTAE) ) provides 

oversight regarding the 

preliminary structure of CTE 

programs. OCTAE administers 

CTE programs funded under 

the Perkins Act. Visit http://cte.

ed.gov.

Career and Technical Education (CTE) programs have proven to be an effective approach to prepare secondary and postsecondary students to succeed in cybersecurity careers.

CTE provides students with the academic, technical, and employability skills through rigorous and applied coursework, 

work-based learning experiences, dual or concurrent enrollment, and industry-recognized certifications.

CTE provides opportunities for students 

to gain technical, academic, and 

professional leadership skills for college 

and career success.

• CTE works for high school students

• CTE works for college students

• CTE works for the economy

• CTE works for business

The top 3 benefits benefits for

students are the attainment of:

Students can take advantage of 

CTE cybersecurity content through:

• Individual CTE courses

• Sequence of classes 

• Career Academies

• Program of Study

• Content modules across 

 the 16 career clusters

• COMPETENCIES to qualify them for a 

cybersecurity career

• EMPLOYABILITY SKILLS such as teamwork

• REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCES to apply learning

CTE Programs of Study (POS) 

are authorized and funded 

through the Carl D. 

Perkins Career and Technical 

Education Act of 2006. A 

high-quality POS includes the 

10 components of the Programs of Study 

Design Framework, such as:

• providing non-duplicative progression of courses 

that align secondary to postsecondary education;

• including opportunities for dual or concurrent 

enrollment programs;

• leading to an industry-recognized certification, 

certificate at the postsecondary level, or an 

associate or baccalaureate degree; and

• including work-based learning experiences, such as 

apprenticeships and internships.

APPLIED LEARNING 

on technical topics 

integrated with 

rigorous academics and 

employability skills

PORTABLE 

CREDENTIALS

such as industryrecognized certifications 

and college credits

 PRACTICAL 

APPLICATION 

of knowledge and skills 

through work-based 

experiences

Cybersecurity Career and 

Technical Education Programs
15,583.

#### Ewing v. Cones et al.; Ewing v. Wade et al.; Ewing v. Carr et al.; Ewing v. Boggs et al.; Ewing v. Parke et al.; Ewing *v.*Williamson et al.; Ewing v. Lumaree.

15,584.

15,585.

15,586.

15,587.

15,588.

15,589.

Filed April 23, 1892.

By the Court.

The judgment in each of the above named cases is reversed upon the authority of *Ewing*v. *Lutz, ante, p.*361, and the cases therein cited.
Minimum Qualifications for Experienced

Firearm and Toolmark Examiners Page 1 of 1 Adopted 04/20/2006

Minimum Qualifications for Experienced Firearm and Toolmark Examiners

1.0 Objective

The following guidelines is to identify the education and/or experience requirements

for an experienced level, firearm and/or toolmark examiner’s position

2.0 Experience and Education Requirements

2.1 Bachelor’s degree in a natural/physical science from an accredited

academic institution, successful completion from a training program and

two years of firearm/toolmark casework experience (which may include

time from the training program) or

2.2 In lieu of an academic degree, the hiring agency will use other experience

equivalencies, at their discretion, to measure the candidate’s

firearm/toolmark casework experience (this can include the time spent

during the training program) and

2.3 The examiner to be hired must demonstrate competency in

firearm/toolmark casework; this will be measured by the hiring agency.

3.0 Personal Background Recommendations

3.1 No felony convictions

3.2 Employment drug screen

3.3 Background investigation
Public Safety Innovation Accelerator Program (PSIAP) Reporting 

Requirements Quick Reference Guide 

The purpose of this reference guide is to support NIST PSCR’s grant and cooperative agreement award 

recipients as they complete their reporting requirements. 

SECTION QUARTERLY SEMIANNUAL ANNUAL 

Period ends Mar 31, Jun 30, Mar 31, Sep 30 Jun 30 

Sep 30, Dec 31 

FINAL 

Reports due 30 days after 

period end 

30 days after 

period end 

30 days after 

period end 

120 days after 

POP ends 

SF-425 ● ● ● ●

Cover page ● ● ● ●

Accomplishments ● ● ● ●

Products ● ●

Participants and other 

collaborating 

organizations 

● ●

Impact* ● ●

Changes/problems ● ● ● ●

Special reporting 

requirements 

Not required Not required 

Budgetary information Not required Not required 

Content Last quarter only Last period only Year-to-date Entire project 

*Include impacts to first responder communications and operations 

Last Updated: 3/4/2022
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4767 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4767

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to triple the amount of the 
                   credit allowed for basic research.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 7, 2004

Mr. Smith of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to triple the amount of the 
                   credit allowed for basic research.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF CREDIT FOR BASIC RESEARCH.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 41(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to general rule for credit for 
increasing research activities) is amended by striking ``20 percent'' 
and inserting ``60 percent''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         207,114
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 207,114
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (145,338)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   207,114
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,068
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,431
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,363)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,363)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,363)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>REGISTRANT HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MONMOUTH CAPITAL CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         547,020
<SECURITIES>                                   412,919
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,121,992
<ALLOWANCES>                                    65,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,556,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,769,261
<PP&E>                                       1,311,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                 110,987
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,855,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,262,513
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,477,839
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,040,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,855,686
<SALES>                                      3,730,244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,288,031
<CGS>                                        2,849,627
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  857,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               453,687
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              81,289
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                    34,239
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,261
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,261
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1


                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, William P. Spencer, CEO and President of Imagenetix, Inc. (the "small
business issuer"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the small
business issuer;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

     4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small
business issuer and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the small business issuer,
          including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by
          others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
          disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
          covered by this report; and

     c)   presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
          the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the small business issuer's
          ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
          have identified for the small business issuers auditors any material
          weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the small business
          issuer's internal controls; and



Dated: 11/22/2004                    Signature:/s/William P. Spencer
                                               ----------------------
                                               William P. Spencer
                                               CEO, President and director
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

***URANIUM RESOURCES, INC.***

405State Highway 121 Bypass, Building A, Suite 110, Lewisville, TX 75067

972.219.3330Phone  972.219.3311 Fax

 

November 10, 2008

 

Securities and ExchangeCommission

450 5th Street,N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, David N. Clark, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of Uranium Resources, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

(1)  TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30,2008 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| */s/* David N. Clark                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| David N. Clark                         |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |
| November 10, 2008                 |   |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GREGORY L. DANIELS, *

 * 

Plaintiff, *

*

vs. * CIVIL ACTION 08-00399-CG-B

*

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, *

Commissioner of *

Social Security, *

*

Defendant. *

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order entered on this date, it is

hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the decision of the

Commissioner of Social Security, denying Plaintiff’s claim for

disability insurance benefits, be AFFIRMED.

DONE and ORDERED this the 19th day of February, 2010.

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-00399-CG-B Document 22 Filed 02/19/10 Page 1 of 1