alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** **
| **SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS** | ** ** | **EXHIBIT  32** |
|--------------------------------------|------------|-----------------|

 

Each of the undersigned herebycertifies that to his knowledge the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thefiscal period ended March 31, 2008 of Allstate Life Insurance Company ofNew York filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York.

 
| May 13, 2008 |   |   |   |   |                                                          |
|-------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|              |   |   |   |   |                                                          |
|              |   |   |   |   | /s/ James E. Hohmann                                          |   |
|              |   |   |   |   | James E. Hohmann                                              |
|              |   |   |   |   | Chairman of the Board,  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|              |   |   |   |   |                                                          |
|              |   |   |   |   |                                                          |
|              |   |   |   |   | /s/ John C. Pintozzi                                          |   |
|              |   |   |   |   | John C. Pintozzi                                              |
|              |   |   |   |   | Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer                   |
|                   |        |        |        |        |                                                               |  |  |

 

E-5

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                     15186576
<SECURITIES>                               2032576
<RECEIVABLES>                              5547
<ALLOWANCES>                               8000
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           17260908
<PP&E>                                     2905835
<DEPRECIATION>                             1877462
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             26820837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      816717
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   3262004
<OTHER-SE>                                 17540168
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               26820837
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           9085465
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           2333562
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            6378207
<INCOME-TAX>                               2305000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        4073207
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               4073207
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0

</TABLE>
11562.

#### Thompson *v.*The State.

Decided July 14, 1920.

(Certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court.)

Indictment for assault with intent to murder; from Forsyth superior court — Judge Blair. April 24, 1920.

Error in not charging the jury that they had the right to recommend a misdemeanor punishment is alleged in the motion for a new trial. The verdict fixed the punishment at " not less than two years nor more than two years.” It is contended that the provisions of the Penal Code (1910), § 1062, as to the right of the jury to recommend that a felony (except as otherwise provided therein) be punished as a misdemeanor, were not altered or affected by the act of 1919 (Ga. L. 1919, p. 387), which provides that in eases of felony not punishable by life imprisonment the jury shall prescribe a minimum and maximum term of punishment.

*J. P. Brooke,*for plaintiff in error.

*John T. Dorsey, solicitor-general, William Butt,*contra.

Luke, J.

1. No exceptions pendente lite to the overruling of the demurrer were filed. The judgment on the demurrer was rendered on April 1, 1920, and the bill of exceptions was tendered to the judge on May 1, 1920, more than 20 days after the overruling of the demurrer, and hence the assignment of error on that judgment was made too late and cannot be considered.

2. The evidence in this case authorized the conviction of the defendant, and the charge of the court, when read in its entirety, was full and fair and not subject to the criticisms urged in the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification ofChief Financial Officerof Granite Broadcasting Corporation**

 

This certification is providedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies thequarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended June 30,2003 of Granite Broadcasting Corporation (the “Issuer”).

 

I, Ellen McClain, the ChiefFinancial Officer of Issuer certify that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          theForm 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)          theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

 

Dated:  August 11, 2003.

 
|   | /s/ ELLEN  McCLAIN |   |
|--------|--------------------|--------|
|   | Ellen  McClain     |

 

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 9, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:

                    1.                     *Sterling Bancorp,*                     Montebello, New York; to merge with Hudson Valley Holding Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire Hudson Valley Bank, N.A., both of Yonkers, New York.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 10, 2014.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-29250 Filed 12-12-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29147]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA).

ACTION: Notice of open Federal Advisory Committee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The SBA is issuing this notice to announce the location, date, 
time and agenda for the 1st quarter meetings of the National Small 
Business Development Center (SBDC) Advisory Board.

DATES: The meetings for the 2nd quarter will be held on the following 
dates:

Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. EST
Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. EST
Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. EST

ADDRESSES: These meetings will be held via conference call.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The meeting is open to the public 
however advance notice of attendance is requested. Anyone wishing to be 
a listening participant must contact Monika Nixon by fax or email. Her 
contact information is Monika Nixon, Program Specialist, 409 Third 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20416, Phone, 202-205-7310, Fax 202-481-
5624, email, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#95f8fafbfcfef4bbfbfcedfafbd5e6f7f4bbf2fae3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80edefeee9ebe1aeeee9f8efeec0f3e2e1aee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), SBA announces the 
meetings of the National SBDC Advisory Board. This Board provides 
advice and counsel to the SBA Administrator and Associate Administrator 
for Small Business Development Centers.
    The purpose of these meetings is to discuss following issues 
pertaining to the SBDC Advisory Board.:

--SBA Update
--Annual Meetings
--Board Assignments
--Member Roundtable

    Additionally, if you need accommodations because of a disability or 
require additional information, please contact Monika Nixon at the 
information above.

Diana Doukas,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-29147 Filed 12-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
- Page 1 - front-page
- Page 2 - front-page
- Page 3 - description
- Page 4 - description
- Page 5 - description
- Page 6 - description
- Page 7 - description
- Page 8 - description
- Page 9 - description
- Page 10 - description
- Page 11 - description
- Page 12 - description
- Page 13 - description
- Page 14 - description
- Page 15 - description
- Page 16 - description
- Page 17 - description
- Page 18 - description
- Page 19 - description
- Page 20 - description
- Page 21 - description
- Page 22 - description
- Page 23 - description
- Page 24 - description
- Page 25 - description
- Page 26 - description
- Page 27 - description
- Page 28 - description
- Page 29 - description
- Page 30 - claims
- Page 31 - claims
- Page 32 - claims
- Page 33 - claims
- Page 34 - drawings
- Page 35 - drawings
- Page 36 - drawings
- Page 37 - drawings
- Page 38 - wo-search-report
- Page 39 - wo-search-report
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                              25
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    45
<PP&E>                                             204
<DEPRECIATION>                                     190
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      59
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,532
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           353
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,826)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        59
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   825
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (836)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (836)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (836)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4801 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4801

 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
          issue an order regarding secondary cockpit barriers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2004

  Mr. Israel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
          issue an order regarding secondary cockpit barriers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) The safety and security of the civil air transportation 
        system is critical to the United States security and its 
        national defense.
            (2) A safe and secure United States civil air 
        transportation system is essential to the basic freedom of 
        Americans to move in intrastate, interstate, and international 
        transportation.
            (3) Security and intelligence officials continue to worry 
        that a terrorist network is planning to use planes as weapons 
        and exploit suspected weakness in United States aviation 
        security.
            (4) Reinforced cockpit doors that must be opened for pilots 
        to use the bathroom and receive food and drink are a clear 
        vulnerability, compromising the security and safety of 
        aircraft.

SEC. 2. IMPROVED FLIGHT DECK INTEGRITY MEASURES.

    (a) In General.--As soon as possible after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration 
shall issue an order requiring the installation of secondary barriers 
preventing access to the flight deck of any commercial aircraft 
operating under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, and 
requiring that such secondary barriers remain locked while the aircraft 
is in flight and the cockpit door separating the flight deck and the 
passenger area is open.
    (b) Considerations.--In issuing an order under this section, the 
Administrator shall take into account--
            (1) the most promising of the available technologies 
        relating to secondary barriers described in subsection (a); and
            (2) the cost and time schedule for deploying such barriers.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 1 8 , 2021 

# Order

Clerk August 1 8 , 2021

16 3423 (3 8 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 16 3423

v COA: 356443

Kent CC: 18

- 011018

- FC

BRIAN KEITH SCHWAB

,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the defendant

- appellant to exceed the

page limitation for his application for leave to appeal is DENIED. The defendan t

- appellant

shall file a revised application of no more than 75 pages within 28 days of this order or the

original application will be stricken and the appeal will be administratively dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 97-6153

BLANE WADE O'NEAL,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.

Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CR-92-212, CA-96-779)

Submitted: November 20, 1997

Decided: December 11, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by unpublished per

curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Blane Wade O'Neal, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting in part

and denying in part his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

1994 & Supp. 1997), and imposing a new sentence upon vacatur of

his conviction and sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c)(1) (West

1976 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and, to the extent that the district court granted Appellant's motion to vacate his conviction under § 924(c) and denied his

motion on his ineffective assistance of counsel claims, we find no

reversible error. Therefore, we affirm in part on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. O'Neal, Nos. CR-92-212; CA-96-779

(E.D. Va. Dec. 6, 1996).

However, the district court erred in imposing a new sentence without having Appellant present and represented by counsel. See Mempa

v. Rhay, 389 U.S. 128, 135 (1967) (right to counsel extends to sentencing); United States v. Nolley, 27 F.3d 80, 82 (4th Cir. 1994) (presence of defendant and counsel required upon resentencing after

vacatur of original sentence). Therefore, we vacate the sentence and

remand this case for resentencing with Appellant present and represented by counsel unless, after proper inquiry, Appellant waives his

right to counsel.

Accordingly, we grant a certificate of appealability, affirm in part,

vacate the sentence imposed, and remand this case for resentencing

with the Appellant present. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED

IN PART, AND REMANDED

 2
<PAGE>

                                                          EXHIBIT 23



                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

MONSANTO COMPANY:

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in Monsanto Company's
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-36636, 2-76696, 2-90152, 
33-13197, 33-21030, 33-39704, 33-39705, 33-39706, 33-39707, 33-49717,
33-53363, 33-53365, 33-53367, 333-02783, 333-02961, 333-02963, 
333-33531, 333-38599 and 333-45341) and Registration Statements on Form
S-4 (Nos. 333-66175 and 333-73233) of our report dated February 26,
1999, incorporated by reference in this annual report on Form 10-K of
Monsanto Company for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                  /s/  DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Saint Louis, Missouri
March 18, 1999



                        21