alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                             20,037
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                   2,225,240
<ALLOWANCES>                       35,000
<INVENTORY>                     1,526,738
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                4,069,431
<PP&E>                         12,059,314
<DEPRECIATION>                  3,869,508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 20,176,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           4,827,592
<BONDS>                         6,090,182
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                     2,500,000
<COMMON>                          102,789
<OTHER-SE>                      7,164,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   20,176,834
<SALES>                        13,565,321
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               13,565,321
<CGS>                           8,832,938
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   8,832,938
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                4,031,396
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                366,724
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   333,232
<INCOME-TAX>                      133,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               200,232
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      200,232
<EPS-BASIC>                        0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.01



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<MULTIPLIER>  1
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                      APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                        JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                                  255,000
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            31,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            (26,000)
<INVENTORY>                                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        462,000
<PP&E>                                                               11,228,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        4,179,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        7,643,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   287,000
<BONDS>                                                               7,929,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          7,643,000
<SALES>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        951,000
<CGS>                                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           672,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      357,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            (78,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                             (7.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                 0


</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4603 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the nonrecognition of gain on real property held by individuals or small businesses 

which is involuntarily converted as the result of the exercise of eminent 

domain, without regard to whether such property is replaced. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2004 

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for the nonrecognition of gain on real property held 

by individuals or small businesses which is involuntarily 

converted as the result of the exercise of eminent domain, 

without regard to whether such property is replaced. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eminent Domain Re5 lief for the Little Guy Act’’. 
2 

•HR 4603 IH 

1 SEC. 2. NONRECOGNITION TREATMENT FOR REAL PROP2 ERTY HELD BY INDIVIDUALS OR SMALL BUSI3 NESSES WHICH IS INVOLUNTARILY CON4 VERTED AS A RESULT OF EXERCISE OF EMI5 NENT DOMAIN. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1033 of the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 (relating to involuntary conversions) 

8 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub9 section: 

10 ‘‘(k) CONDEMNATION OF REAL PROPERTY HELD BY

11 INDIVIDUALS AND SMALL BUSINESSES.— 

12 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If real property held by the 

13 taxpayer is (as the result of its seizure, requisition, 

14 or condemnation, or threat or imminence thereof) 

15 compulsorily or involuntary converted, at the election 

16 of the taxpayer (in such form and manner as the 

17 Secretary may prescribe)— 

18 ‘‘(A) no gain shall be recognized, and 

19 ‘‘(B) subsections (a) and (b) shall not 

20 apply with respect to such conversion. 

21 ‘‘(2) NOT APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN LARGE

22 BUSINESSES.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply in the 

23 case of a partnership or corporation unless such 

24 partnership or corporation meets the gross receipts 

25 test of section 448(c) for the taxable year in which 

26 the disposition of the converted property occurs.’’. 
3 

•HR 4603 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to dispositions of converted prop3 erty occurring after December 31, 2003. 

Æ
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4809 

To make permanent the reduction in taxes on dividends and capital gains. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2004 

Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To make permanent the reduction in taxes on dividends 

and capital gains. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Investment Tax In5 crease Prevention Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PERMANENT REDUCTION IN TAXES ON DIVIDENDS 

7 AND CAPITAL GAINS. 

8 Section 303 of the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Rec9 onciliation Act of 2003 (relating to sunset of title) is re10 pealed. 

Æ
Infected System (Bot) Metrics 

(Problems, Needs & Standards) 

Patrick Cain
 

Resident Research Fellow
 

APWG
 

1 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Everybody: ‘We need bot metrics’!
 

• Bad metrics are as bad as no metrics 

– There is vast over counting 

– One needs to understand ISP IP policy for real measurements 

– Same computer seen at multiple detectors 

• There’s political capital in making bug numbers 

– Everyone uses different definitions 

• But what’s in a metric? 

– what are the metrics used for? 

– Capturing the right data via reporting makes metrics are 

real 

• [use IODEF – we can force certain data in a submission J] 

2 

2/163 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What we need in metrics 

• They need to be transparent & recalculatable 

• Not ‘shaming numbers’, deltas, or top 10 lists 

• And they will evolve... L

• The APWG uses metrics for education & action 

– Crime Fighters never get enough resources 

– How do we show governments/ISPs/ICANN where the 

problems are? 

– How do we show when the problems get ‘better’ 

3 

3/163 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A good use of metrics 

• True metrics can be used to enlighten the bosses 

to direct resources to a problem 

– ex: the APWG phishing report 

• We compile per capita stats on phishing URLs & collectors 

• You could redo our calculations for accuracy 

• People ‘shame’ themselves into corrections 

• They also show trends – both upward and 

downward – and improvements 

4 

4/163 
 

 

 

 

 

 

The needs 

• Solid definitions 

– Everyone has to use the same language 

• Integrated into or a part of the ISP/end-user 

reporting and notification systems 

– There needs to more international versions of these 

• Ability for independent calculation 

– Not everyone is going to submit raw data. 

5 

5/163 
 

 

Thank You
 

pcain@apwg.org
 [Send us data in IODEF.]
 

[Wait. Send us BOT data in IODEF.]
 

6
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.20


         WHEREAS, on November 15, 1999, the Nominating Committee of this Board
         of Directors approved an increase in the annual retainer to be paid to
         outside directors effective January 1, 2000, and reported the action to
         this Board of Directors at its meeting on November 16, 1999, which
         report was accepted without objection but, inadvertently, without any
         formal action by this Board of Directors being proposed or taken;

         RESOLVED, that the resolution adopted by this Board of Directors on
         November 19, 1996, relating to compensation of outside directors
         generally, as previously amended by resolution adopted by this Board of
         Directors on November 17, 1998, be and hereby is further amended and
         modified to provide that the per month retainer for serving as a
         director be increased from $1,500 per month ($18,000 per year) to
         $1,833.33 (or $1,833.34, as needed) per month ($22,000) per year
         effective January 1, 2000; and that all actions taken by officers of
         the Company to implement said increase as of the effective date thereof
         be and hereby are ratified, confirmed and approved in all respects.

         RESOLVED FURTHER, that the said resolution adopted November 17, 1998 be
         and hereby is revoked and rescinded, as of the effective date of the
         foregoing increase; and, except to the extent amended and modified by
         the foregoing resolution, the said resolutions adopted November 19,
         1996 remain in full force and effect.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Hoolae Paoa, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mid-State Raceway, Inc.
and Subsidiary;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: January 10, 2004
/s/ Hoolae Paoa
#### Harold A. JULIEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John N. SCOTT; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-15148.

D.C. No. CV-98-02240-CAL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2001 *.

Decided May 30, 2001.

Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Harold A. Julien appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment and various other orders in his action alleging race-based employment discrimination and retaliation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), *Steckman v. Hart Brewing, Inc.,*143 F.3d 1293, 1295 (9th Cir.1998), and review de novo the district court’s summary judgment, *Godwin v. Hunt Wesson, Inc.,*150 F.3d 1217, 1219-20 (9th Cir.1998). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Julien’s claims labeled Count II, *see Nunez v. City of Los Angeles,*147 F.3d 867, 872-73 (9th Cir.1998), Count III, *see Huskey v. City of San Jose,*204 F.3d 893, 899 (9th Cir.2000), and Counts IV and V, *see Sanchez v. City of Santa Ana,*936 F.2d 1027, 1039-40 (9th Cir.1990).

The district court also properly granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants with respect to the claims labeled Count I, *see Huskey,*204 F.3d at 899, Count VI, *see Godwin,*150 F.3d at 1219-20, *quoting Texas Dep’t of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine,*450 U.S. 248, 253, 101 S.Ct. 1089, 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981) (providing that plaintiff must offer evidence that “give[s] rise to an inference of unlawful discrimination.”), Count VII, *see*Cal.Penal Code § 240; *Fraguglia v. Sala,*17 Cal.App.2d 738, 62 P.2d 783, 785 (Cal.Dist.Ct.App.1936), and Count VIII, *see Sabow v. United States,*93 F.3d 1445, 1454-55 (9th Cir.1996).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Julien’s motion to compel discovery, motions for recusal, or motion to review taxed costs.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Gary L. Dreher, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AMDL, Inc. for the period ended March31, 2007; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the small business issuer and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer’s first fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date:May 21, 2007     /s/ Gary L. Dreher Gary L. Dreher  Chief Executive Officer
#### Carson Daniel et al. *v.*Joseph Ulman.

Fraudulent Conveyances — Disposal of Property With Fraudulent Intent.

The evidence was held to show that at about the time of the attachment of defendant’s property, he was about to dispose of his property with the intention to defraud his creditors, and delay them in the collection of their debts.

APPEAL PROM McCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT.

January 12, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

During the months of October and November, 1872, Ulman purchased over $1,800 worth of goods. In January, 1873, he purchased a bill of $647. If his stock on hand the 1st of Oct., 1872, be estimated as low as $500, it will result that during the four months named he had in his possession near three thousand dollars worth of goods. His invoice when the goods were attached showed that he then had on hand, goods amounting to $1,106.06. He had, therefore, between Oct. 1, 1872, and Feb. 3, 1873, disposed of, at cost price, $1,900 worth of his stock. Allow $100 per month for his family expenses, which is more than he claims they amounted to, and there is $1,400 unaccounted for. It is true he claims to have been paying his debts, but he fails to point out who he paid, and the amount of the payments.

Take another view. His books show that in Oct. and Nov., 1873, his cash sales were $1,200. He says he sold $50 per month in Dec., 1872, and Jan., 1873. It is shown that in addition thereto he sold of the single article of coffee, in January, $80 worth. These cash sales foot up $1,380. Credit him by $500 family expenses, and $880 amount unaccounted for.

It is palpable, however, that he must have sold more than $50 per month during December and January. But concede that he did not. The fact that he fails to account for so large a sum of money, upon the one hand, or so large an amount in value of goods upon the other, and also that his books have been mutilated so that his transactions in December and January cannot be ascertained from' them, leads the mind irresistibly to the conclusion that he has been and was about, at the time the attachment was sued out, to *431sell his goods with intent to defraud his creditors, and to delay them in the collection of their debts.

*Bigger & Moss, for appellants.*

*Marshall & Bloomfield, for appellee.*

The judgment dismissing the order of attachment is reversed, and cause remanded with instructions to sustain the same, and to apply the proceeds of the attached property, or so much thereof as may be necessary, to the payment of appellants’ claims.

This conclusion avoids the necessity for deciding the question raised by appellee as to the propriety of rendering the personal judgments after discharging the order of attachment.
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 

SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RESTRICTIVE LEGEND(S) 
  

			
	 NUMBER

PC-    
		
*                    * SHARES

SERIES C CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK


 ONCOTHYREON INC. 

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS 
 OF THE
STATE OF DELAWARE 
 This Certifies That
                                 is the record holder of
                    
(                    ) fully paid and nonassessable shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of ONCOTHYREON INC., transferable only on
the books of the said Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by a duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed or assigned. 

This certificate and the shares it represents are subject to the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the corporation, and any
amendments thereto, as well as the restrictive legends on the back of this certificate. Upon request, stockholders may obtain free of charge from the corporation’s principal office a statement describing the preferences, limitations and
relative rights granted to or imposed upon each class or series of shares or upon the holders of such shares. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation
has caused this certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers this      day of             , 20    . 

 

					
	  
 Robert L. Kirkman
				  
 Gary Christianson

	President and Chief Executive Officer				Assistant Secretary








 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY SELLS, ASSIGNS AND TRANSFERS UNTO
                    ,                     
SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE AND DOES HEREBY IRREVOCABLY CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT                      ATTORNEY TO TRANSFER SAID SHARES ON
THE SHARE REGISTER OF THE CORPORATION WITH FULL POWER OF SUBSTITUTION IN THE PREMISES. 
  

			
	DATED                        		
		
			  
 (Signature)


 NOTICE: The signature on this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of this certificate, in every
particular, without alteration or enlargement, or any change whatsoever