alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ANNUAL REPORT ON FROM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 1996 AND THE QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000840319
<NAME>                        APHTON CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
       
<S>                             <C>         
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS       
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                        6,964
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0<F1>
<PP&E>                                            0
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                7,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0<F1>
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                     26,665
<OTHER-SE>                                      147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  7,199
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 75
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 1,456
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1,381)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1,381)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.11)
<FN>
<F1>
     REGISTRANT HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23




Consent of Independent Accountants



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus 
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 No. 33-43655, to 
the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus constituting part of the 
Registration Statement on Form S-3 No. 33-58403, to the incorporation by 
reference in the Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on 
Form S-3 No. 33-64576, to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statement on Form S-8 No. 33-24952, to the incorporation by reference in the 
Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 33-28096, to the incorporation by 
reference in the Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on 
Form S-3 No. 33-32275, to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus 
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 No. 33-55816, to 
the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus constituting part of the 
Registration Statement on Form S-3 No. 33-56739, to the incorporation by 
reference in the Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on 
Form S-3 No. 333-14369, to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus 
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 No. 333-14369-01, 
to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus constituting part of the 
Registration Statement on Form S-3 No. 333-17181, of our report dated February 
6, 1997, except as to paragraphs 3 and 5 of Note 2, which are as of February 
21, 1997, appearing on page 51 of The Montana Power Company's Annual Report on 
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.


/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Portland, Oregon
March 16, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            3076
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             137
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      28654
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          155631
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            155528
<LOANS>                                         305932
<ALLOWANCE>                                       2770
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  518540
<DEPOSITS>                                      438702
<SHORT-TERM>                                      2818
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               4310
<LONG-TERM>                                      38884
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           260
<OTHER-SE>                                       33566
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  518540
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  17604
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 9685
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 27289
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               12060
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14153
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            13136
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       90
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   3
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  12452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2311
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1644
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1644
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.48
<LOANS-NON>                                       3577
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   562
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  2767
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       97
<RECOVERIES>                                        10
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 2770
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              2770
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           2397
        

</TABLE>
11242.

#### LOVEJOY *v.*LAMAR.

Decided June 16, 1920.

1. In recommitting this case to the auditor, it was not error for the trial judge, instead of recommitting the case generally, to- direct that- the auditor, from the pleadings, the testimony already introduced, and the record in the case, amend his findings and show whether Mrs. Lamar ratified the loan of her funds to the Lovejoy Company by the defendant; this direction being in accord with a direction previously given by the Court of Appeals in this case (20 *Ga. App.*499, 93 S. E. 153).

2. This court can not as a matter of law say that there is no evidence to support the verdict on the issue raised by the exceptions of fact to the finding of the auditor.

Exceptions to auditor’s report; from Pulaski superior court — Judge Graliam. December *8,*1919.

Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

H. *E. Coates, W. L. Grice, Hall & Grice, C. J. Bloch,*for plaintiff in error.

H. *F. Lawson,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

1. When this case was first before .this court (20 *Ga. App.*499, 93 S. E. 153) the judgment of the trial court was reversed and the case remanded with direction that “ the case be recommitted to the auditor, in order that he may return a specific finding upon the issue of ratification, as made by the *pleadings and evidence.”*(Italics ours.) After this ruling, and when the case was again reached in the superior court, the judge by order referred the case to the auditor, “with direction that the said auditor, from the pleadings, testimony already introduced, and the record in said case, amend his findings and clearly show in his said findings whether or not the said Mrs. Cornelia Lamar at any time ratified the making of the loan of her funds to the Lovejoy Company by said defendant.” To this order counsel for defendant excepted, and “assigns the same as error, and says that the court erred in limiting the re-referring or recommittment aforesaid, but should have, by appropriate order, recommitted the *415case generally to the auditor.” There is no merit in this exception, for the order re-referring the case was in complete accord with the direction given by this court referred to above.

2. Upon the hearing of the case after the recommitment the auditor found as follows: “I find that the plaintiff, Mrs. Cornelia Lamar, never at any time ratified the lending of her funds to the Lovejoy Company by defendant, T. E. Lovejoy.” To this finding the defendant filed exceptions of fact, and the issue thus raised was submitted to a jury, which sustained the finding of the auditor. This court cannot say, as a matter of law, that there is no evidence to support the verdict, and the judgment refusing a new trial is *Affirmed.*

Broyles, *C. J. and Luke, J., concur.*
<page>						         EXHIBIT 31.02

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey D. Hahn, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation ("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant,
certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and

<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Demeter's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.






Date:   May 17, 2004          /s/Jeffrey D. Hahn
                                 Jeffrey D. Hahn
                                 Chief Financial Officer,
                                 Demeter Management Corporation,
                                 general partner of the registrant
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KE DA FU, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 20-71805 

Agency No. A075-502-854 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 18, 2021**

Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges. 

Ke Da Fu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration 

judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of 

removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-71805 

evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-

85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Fu did not 

establish a well-founded fear of persecution. See Gu v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014, 

1022 (9th Cir. 2006) (applicant failed “to present compelling, objective evidence 

demonstrating a well-founded fear of persecution”); Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 

1245 (9th Cir. 2000) (two-year period of continued residence without harm 

following the incident that formed the basis of the applicant’s claim did not support

an objective fear of persecution). Thus, Fu’s asylum claim fails. 

In this case, because Fu failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he failed to 

establish eligibility for withholding of removal. See Zehatye, 453 F.3d at 1190. 

In light of this disposition, we need not reach Fu’s remaining contentions 

regarding his asylum and withholding of removal claims. See Simeonov v. 

Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts and agencies are not required 

to decide issues unnecessary to the results they reach).

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate. The motion for a stay of removal is otherwise denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
ex10-2.htm



Exhibit 10.2


 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND AGREEMENT










 





THIS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND AGREEMENT (this “Acknowledgement”) is entered into on May 12, 2015, by and between VistaGen Therapeutics, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Platinum Long Term Growth VII, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation (“Platinum”).







For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.           Platinum and the Company are parties to an Agreement, dated May 5, 2015, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Agreement”).  The Agreement provides that the Closing Date under the terms thereof shall be the date upon which confirmation is received from the Nevada Secretary of State of the filing of the Company’s Certificate of Determination of Rights and Preferences of the Series B Preferred, as such term is defined in the Agreement.  The parties agree and acknowledge that, for purposes of the Agreement, the Closing Date shall be May 12, 2015.









2.           The provisions of the Agreement, as modified and clarified herein, shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms and are hereby ratified and confirmed. Neither party in any way waives their respective obligations to comply with any of the provisions, covenants and terms of the Agreement and the other agreements referred to in the Agreement. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York without regard to the conflict of laws provisions thereof.
















IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have signed this instrument as of the date first set forth above.










	
ADDRESS:

	  	  	
VISTAGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.


	
 


343 Allerton Avenue


South San Francisco, CA 94080


 

	  	  	  
	  	  	  	
By: /s/ Shawn K. Singh


Name: Shawn K. Singh


Title:   Chief Executive Officer


 


	  	  	  	  
	
ADDRESS:

	  	  	
PLATINUM LONG TERM GROWTH VII, LLC


	
 


250 West 55th Street, 14th Floor


New York, NY 10019

	  	  	  
	  	  	  	
By: /s/ David Steinberg


Name: David Steinberg


Title: Authorized Signatory
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Ronald Mustari, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of Whitehall
Limited, Inc. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Whitehall Limited, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of
the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 1, 2006



/s/ Ronald MustariRonald Mustari, President andChief Executive Officer
jfourtt) Court of Appeals;

^an Antonio, tlexas

October 9, 2013

No. 04-13-00650-CR

John CANALES,

Appellant

V,

The STATE ofTexas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR8914

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court's opinion ofthis date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK

OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on October 9,2013.

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court of October, 2013.

Kfith E. Horfle, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           6,691
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,570
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     68,754
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             250
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               250
<LOANS>                                        126,534
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,389
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 210,235
<DEPOSITS>                                     182,140
<SHORT-TERM>                                    14,700
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,807
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,902
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,686
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 210,235
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,683
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,220
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    72
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,975
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,018
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,307
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,668
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      103
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  19
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,676
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,345
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         935
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       935
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.18
<LOANS-NON>                                        890
<LOANS-PAST>                                        96
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,384
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,283
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       57
<RECOVERIES>                                        60
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,389
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,334
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             55
        



</TABLE>