Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 236 / Tuesday, December 9, 2014 / Notices 73029 

11See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

1See Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving and 

Racks From the People’s Republic of China: 

Countervailing Duty Order, 74 FR 46973 (September 

14, 2009) (CVD Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 79 

FR 44743 (August 1, 2014). 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h), 

unless this deadline is extended. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, the 

Department shall determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review.11 Golden Dragon and Nacobre 

reported the names of the importers of 

record and the entered value for all of 

their sales to the United States during 

the POR. If Golden Dragon’s and 

Nacobre’s weighted-average dumping 

margins are not zero or de minimis (i.e., 

less than 0.50 percent) in the final 

results of this review, we will calculate 

importer-specific assessment rates on 

the basis of the ratio of the total amount 

of dumping calculated for the importer’s 

examined sales and the total entered 

value of those sales in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), and we will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries covered 

by this review. Where either the 

respondent’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis, or an 

importer-specific assessment rate is zero 

or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. This clarification will 

apply to entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by Golden 

Dragon and Nacobre for which they did 

not know their merchandise was 

destined for the United States. In such 

instances, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. For a full discussion of 

this clarification, see Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

We intend to issue instructions to 

CBP 41 days after the publication date 

of the final results of this review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

notice of final results of administrative 

review for all shipments of seamless 

refined copper pipe and tube from 

Mexico entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication as provided by 

section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash 

deposit rates for Golden Dragon and 

Nacobre will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margins established in 

the final results of this administrative 

review; (2) for merchandise exported by 

manufacturers or exporters not covered 

in this review but covered in a prior 

segment of the proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently-completed segment; (3) if 

the exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

investigation but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recentlycompleted segment for the manufacturer 

of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 26.03 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the Order. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: December 2, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Discussion of the Methodology 

i. Normal Value Comparisons 

ii. Determination of Comparison Method 

iii. Product Comparisons 

iv. Date of Sale 

v. Constructed Export Price 

vi. Normal Value 

vii. Currency Conversion 

[FR Doc. 2014–28827 Filed 12–8–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–942] 

Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving 

and Racks From the People’s Republic 

of China: Final Results of Expedited 

Sunset Review of the Countervailing 

Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) finds that revocation 

of the countervailing duty order (CVD) 

order on certain kitchen appliance 

shelving and racks (kitchen racks) from 

the People’s Republic of China (PRC) 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of a countervailable 

subsidy at the levels indicated in the 

Final Results of Review section of this 

notice. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 9, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Kolberg, Office I, AD/CVD 

Operations, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1785. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Background 

On August 1, 2014, the Department 

initiated a sunset review of the CVD 

Order 1 on kitchen racks from the PRC 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On 

August 18, 2014, the Department 

received a notice of intent to participate 

in the review on behalf of Nashville 

Wire Products, Inc. (Nashville Wire) and 

SSW Holding Company, Inc. (SSW) 

(collectively, the domestic industry) 

within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i). Each of these 

companies claimed interested party 

status under section 771(9)(C) of the 

Act, as domestic producers of the 

domestic like product. 

The Department received adequate 

substantive responses collectively from 

the domestic industry within the 30-day 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did 

not receive a substantive response from 

the Government of the PRC or any 

respondent interested party to the 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
73030 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 236 / Tuesday, December 9, 2014 / Notices 

3On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

1See Petitioner’s submission entitled ‘‘Petitions 

For The Imposition Of Antidumping And 

Countervailing Duties Against Melamine From 

China And Trinidad And Tobago,’’ dated November 

12, 2014 (‘‘Petitions’’). 

2See Volume I of the Petitions, at 2. 

3See Letter from the Department to Petitioner 

entitled ‘‘Petition for the Imposition of 

Countervailing Duties on Imports of Melamine from 

Trinidad and Tobago: Supplement Question,’’ dated 

November 14, 2014; Letter from the Department to 

Petitioner entitled ‘‘Petitions for the Imposition of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on Imports 

of Melamine from the People’s Republic of China 

and Trinidad and Tobago: Supplemental 

Questions,’’ dated November 14, 2014 (‘‘General 

Issues Supplemental Questionnaire’’); Letter from 

the Department to Petitioner entitled ‘‘Petitions for 

the Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duties on Imports of Melamine from the People’s 

Republic of China and Trinidad and Tobago: 

Supplemental Questions,’’ dated November 19, 

2014 (‘‘Second General Issues Supplemental 

Questionnaire’’). 

proceeding. Because the Department 

received no response from the 

respondent interested parties, the 

Department conducted an expedited 

review of this CVD order, pursuant to 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(l)(ii)(B)(2) and (C)(2). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is certain kitchen appliance shelving 

and racks from the People’s Republic of 

China. The product is currently 

classified under the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

numbers 7321.90.5000, 7321.90.6040, 

7321.90.6090, 8418.99.8050, 

8418.99.8060, 8419.90.9520, 

8516.90.8000, and 8516.90.8010. 

Although the HTSUS numbers are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written product 

description remains dispositive. 

For a full description of the scope, see 

‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for 

the Final Results of Expedited Sunset 

Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order on Certain Kitchen Appliance 

Shelving and Racks from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ from Gary 

Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul 

Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, dated 

concurrently with this final notice 

(Issues and Decision Memorandum), 

and hereby adopted by this notice. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this review are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. The issues discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

include the likelihood of continuation 

or recurrence of a countervailable 

subsidy and the net countervailable 

subsidy likely to prevail if the CVD 

Order were revoked. Parties can find a 

complete discussion of all issues raised 

in this expedited sunset review and the 

corresponding recommendations in this 

public memorandum which is on file 

electronically via the Enforcement and 

Compliance Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS).3

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and in the 

Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the 

main Department of Commerce 

building. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

on the Internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

versions of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Results of Review 

Pursuant to sections 752(b)(1) and (3) 

of the Act, we determine that revocation 

of the CVD Order on kitchen racks from 

the PRC would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of a net 

countervailable subsidy at the rates 

listed below: 

Producer/exporter Subsidy rate 

(percent) 

Guangdong Wire King Co., 

Ltd. (formerly known as 

Foshan Shunde Wireking 

Housewares & Hardware) 19.13 

Asber Enterprises Co., Ltd. 

(China) .............................. 175.03 

Changzhou Yixiong Metal 

Products Co., Ltd .............. 154.12 

Foshan Winleader Metal 

Products Co., Ltd .............. 154.12143 

Kingsun Enterprises Group 

Co, Ltd .............................. 154.12 

Yuyao Hanjun Metal Work 

Co./Yuyao Hanjun Metal 

Products Co., Ltd .............. 154.12 

Zhongshan Iwatani Co., Ltd. 154.12 

All Others .............................. 17.51 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of return/

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results and notice in accordance 

with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: December 1, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28831 Filed 12–8–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–021, C–274–807] 

Melamine From the People’s Republic 

of China and Trinidad and Tobago: 

Initiation of Countervailing Duty 

Investigations 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 9, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew Medley at (202) 482–4987 or 

Eve Wang at (202) 482–6231 (People’s 

Republic of China); Brendan Quinn at 

(202) 482–5848 or Raquel Silva at (202) 

482–6475 (Republic of Trinidad and 

Tobago), Office III, AD/CVD Operations, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The Petitions 

On November 12, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) received countervailing 

duty (‘‘CVD’’) petitions concerning 

imports of melamine from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) and Trinidad 

and Tobago (‘‘Trinidad and Tobago’’) 

filed in proper form on behalf of 

Cornerstone Chemical Company 

(‘‘Petitioner’’). The CVD petitions were 

accompanied by two antidumping duty 

(‘‘AD’’) petitions.1 Petitioner is a 

domestic producer of melamine.2

On November 14, and November 19, 

2014, the Department requested 

information and clarification for certain 

areas of the Petitions.3 Petitioner filed 

responses to these requests on 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES