alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


May 12, 2015


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, Strategic Growth and Income
Trust, Series 7


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, Strategic Growth and Income Trust, Series 7 set forth above (the “Trust”).
We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our
evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on May 11, 2015, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the
Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations
of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-202721) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect
to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                                  


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
NICE Working Group

Meeting Agenda

Date: November 30,	2016 Time:	3:30 PM	ET

SharePoint: https://nistgov.sharepoint.com/sites/NICEProgram/NICEWG

I. Roll Call, Introduction, and Ground Rules

II. NICE Program Office Updates

III. Opening Remarks

a. Academic Co-Chair

b. Industry Co-Chair

IV. Standing Items

a. Fun Facts – creating a	culture of evidence

Topic: Cracking the Gender Code

URL: http://https://www.accenture.com/us-en/cracking-the-gender-code

b. Report	Roundup – learning from good ideas

Topic: State CIO Top Ten Priorities for 2017

URL:

http://www.nascio.org/Portals/0/Publications/Documents/2017/NASCIO

-TopTen-2017.pdf

c. Event	Engagement	– highlights from recent	events and upcoming events

Topic: Recap of the Annual NICE Conference

d. Strategy Stories – new developments that	align to NICE Strategy

Topic: Draft	NIST Special Publication 800-181, NICE Cybersecurity

Workforce Framework

URL: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/PubsDrafts.html#SP-800-181

e. Metric Moment	– what	gets measured gets done

Topic: NICERC Measures for Success and Progress

URL: http://nicerc.org/

V. Subgroup Updates

a. K-12

b. Collegiate

c. Competitions

d. Training and Certifications
	 	

	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	

	 	

e. Workforce Management

VI. Project	Progress Reports

a. National K-12 Cybersecurity Education Conference

b. NICE Challenge Project

c. CyberSeek

VII. New	Business

Topic: Human Factors Mapping Project

URL: Cybersecurity Human Factors Mapping Project

VIII. Summary of Action Items

IX. Next	Meeting Reminder
11224.

#### Alexander *v.*The State.

Decided April 13, 1920.

Indictment for misdemeanor; from Taliaferro superior court — Judge Walker. November 28, 1919.

The sheriff testified that in a swamp about 400 yards from the house of Felix Alexander (the defendant) they found “a lard can still apparatus and a barrel of mash such as is used in making liquor.” Felix Alexander’s field that he cultivated ran up to 50 feet of where they found the still on one side; on the other three sides the witness did not know whose land it was. He did not know of his own knowledge whose land it was or who was in possession of the swamp where the still was found, but supposed it was Felix Alexander’s. There was no other testimony as to ownership, possession, or control of the land. The defendant’s statement at the trial was: “ I never made any liquor in my life and had nothing to do with this still, if any one was found, and did not know it was there.”

*J. A. Beazley,*for plaintiff in error.

*R. C. Norman, solicitor-general, Alvin G. Golucke,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted, under section 22 of the act of 1917 (Ga. L. Ex. Sess. 1917, p. 18), of knowingly permitting apparatus for the distilling or manufacturing of intoxicating liquors to be located on his premises. There was no evidence that authorized a finding that the land upon which the apparatus was discovered was owned, controlled, or possessed by the defendant. His conviction, therefore, was contrary to law and the evidence, and the court erred in overruling his motion for a new trial.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMDL, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary L. Dreher, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





| | /s/ Gary L.
Dreher                                   
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| | Gary L. Dreher
Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2002
#### N. C. Gray *v.*Wm. Scott et al.

Principal and Surety — Answer by Sureties.

In an action against sureties on a note, it was held that the sureties in their answer should have alleged payment of the note, or that *414because of tbe information communicated to them they failed to institute proceedings by which they could- have indemnified themselves, ' or that they were in some way injured.

APPEAL FROM LYON CIRCUIT .COURT.

January 6, 1874.

*J. R. Hewlett, for appellant.*

*-, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

This record presents but two questions for consideration. 1st, does the 2nd paragraph of the answer to which appellant’s demurrer was overruled present a good defense to the action. And 2nd, did the court below err in the instructions given to the jury at the instance of appellees.

It is not alleged in the answer that Dunn, the principal obligor in the note sued on, had paid or discharged the same; but it is simply stated in the answer that appellant had told appellee, Scott, that the debt had been paid, which merely presented an issue of whether Scott had been so informed by apellant, which was immaterial, unless it had been further averred in the answer that, by reason of the statement made by appellant to. Scott, the debt had been paid. The sureties, in the note had been lulled into security and prevented from, taking legal proceedings against their principal, which they otherwise would have done, whereby they, would have been indemnified.

Either a direct allegation of payment or one to- the effect that by the information communicated by appellant to. Scott, the sureties failed to institute proceedings by which they could and would have-indemnified themselves, or that they were in some way injured, was ■ necessary to constitute a defense to- the action. As the answer does not contain the necessary statement of facts, appellant’s demurrer to it was improperly overruled. This view of the case -renders it needless to further notice the instructions. Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause is. remanded with directions to set aside the verdict and award a new trial and for further proceedings consistent herewith.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20425 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PHILLIP RAY WATKINS,
Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(CR-H-95-301)

January 16, 1997
Before JOHNSON, GARWOOD, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Phillip Ray Watkins appeals his conviction of con spiracy to

possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine and aiding and
abetting the possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute.

Watkins contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his

conviction.

In reviewing the s ufficiency of evidence to support a
conviction, the Court “must determine whether viewing the evidence2

and inferences therefrom ‘in a light most favorable to the jury’s
guilty verdict[], a rational trier of fact could have found [the]

defendant[] guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.’” U nited States v.
Payne , 99 F.3d 1273, 1278 (5th Cir. 1996)(quoting United States v. Velgar-Vivero , 8 F.3d 236, 239 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied , 114
S. Ct. 1865 (1994)). Circumstantial evidence alone may prove the
existence of a conspiracy. U nited States v. Dean , 59 F.3d 1479,

1485 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied , 1 16 S. Ct. 747 (1996). Some
circumstances, if considered individually, may be insufficient to
establish guilt; however, those same circumstances, if considered
collectively, could be sufficient e vidence of guilt. S ee United
States v. Lechuga , 888 F.2d 1472, 1476 (5th Cir. 1989).
Thus, after thoroughly reviewing the record in the present

case, we hold that the evidence is sufficient for a reasonable jury
to find Watkins guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage                     *de novo,*                     or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 26, 2014.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Nadine Wallman, Vice President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:

                    1.                     *WesBanco, Inc.,*                     Wheeling, West Virginia; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of ESB Financial Corporation, and indirectly acquire ESB Bank, both in Ellwood City, Pennsylvania, and thereby engage in operating a savings association, pursuant to section 224.28(b)(4)(ii).                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 26, 2014.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-28357 Filed 12-1-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF MILLIPORE CORPORATION

Company Name                             Jurisdiction of Organization
------------                             ----------------------------
BCL Acquisition Corp.                             Delaware
BCL Holding Corp.                                 Delaware
Bioprocessing Corporation Limited                 United Kingdom
Bioprocessing Limited                             United Kingdom
Millicorp, Inc.                                   Delaware
Millilux S.a.r.L.                                 Luxembourg
Millipore Asia Ltd.                               Delaware
Millipore Korea Co. Ltd.                          Korea
Millipore Singapore Pte. Ltd.                     Singapore
Millipore Cidra, Inc.                             Delaware
Millipore Intertech (V.I.), Inc.                  U.S. Virgin Islands
Millipore (Canada) Ltd.                           Canada
Millipore S.A. de C.V.                            Mexico
Millipore GesmbH                                  Austria
Millipore Kft                                     Hungary
Millipore S.R.O.                                  Czech Republic
Millipore Sp.z.o.o.                               Poland
Millipore Investment Holdings Limited             Delaware
Millipore International Holding Company B.V.      Netherlands
Millipore S.A./N.V.                               Belgium
Millipore (U.K.) Ltd.                             United Kingdom
Millipore S.A.                                    France
Millipore Ireland B.V.                            Netherlands
Millipore Dublin International Finance Company    Ireland
Millipore GmbH                                    Germany
Millipore S.p.A.                                  Italy
Millipore AB                                      Sweden
Millipore AS                                      Norway
Millipore AG                                      Switzerland
Millipore A/S                                     Denmark
Millipore Australia Pty. Ltd.                     Australia
Millipore Iberica S.A.                            Spain
Millipore Industria E Comercio Ltda.              Brazil
Millipore OY                                      Finland
Millipore B.V.                                    Netherlands
Millipore China Ltd.                              Hong Kong
Millipore S.a.r.L.                                Luxembourg
Millipore Pacific Limited                         Delaware
Millipore (Suzhou) Filter Company Limited         Peoples Republic of China
Minerva Insurance Co. Ltd.                        Bermuda
Nihon Millipore Limited                           Japan
Vermeer                                           Ireland
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Historic Preservation Properties 1989
LP ("HPP'89") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HPP'89.

/s/ Terrence P. Sullivan
----------------------------
Terrence P. Sullivan
General Partner
(Performing similar functions of the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer)

Date:  May 6, 2005
### FOR PUBLICATION 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  O LAKUNLE O SHODI , AKA Bode Okeowo, AKA Olakunle Akintola Oshodi, AKA Olakunle Akintola Akinbayo Oshodi, AKA Isaac No. 08-71478 Oliver Alger, AKA Curtis Evans, AKA Bode Olacune Okeowo, Agency No.



#  AKA Isaac Okeowo , A023-484-662 Petitioner, ORDER v. E RIC H. H OLDERJr., Attorney General , Respondent. 

# 

Filed May 3, 2012

ORDER
KOZINSKI , Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

4937
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2005 (the "Report") of FMS Financial  Corporation  (the  "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission,  we, Craig W. Yates,  President and
Chief  Executive  Officer,  and  Channing L.  Smith,  Vice  President  and Chief
Financial  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350, as adopted,
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                           <S>

/s/ Craig W. Yates                              /s/ Channing L. Smith
-------------------------------------           --------------------------------------------
Craig W. Yates                                  Channing L. Smith
President and Chief Executive Officer           Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)                   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


Date:  August 11, 2005                          Date: August 11, 2005

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

## **Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**

 

I, David N. Clark, certifythat:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q****of Uranium Resources, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.             The issuer’s other certifying officers and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the issuer and have:

 

(a)  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)  Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)  Disclosedin this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (theissuer’s first fiscal quarter of the annual report) that has materiallyaffected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The issuer’s other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of issuer’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date: May 11, 2009 |                         |
|-------------------------|------------------------------|
|                    |                         |
|                    |                         |
|                    | /s/ David N. Clark           |
|                    | Title:  President       |
|                    | and Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
BOSTON FINANCIAL QUALIFIED HOUSING TAX CREDITS L.P. III
                             (A Limited Partnership)

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing
Tax Credits L.P. III (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.



                                             /s/Gary Mentesana
                                     --------------------------------------
                                                Gary Mentesana
                                                Principal Executive Officer and
                                                Principal Financial Officer
                                                Arch Street III, Inc., as
                                                Managing General Partner of
                                                Boston Financial Qualified
                                                Housing Tax Credits L.P. III

                                                Date:  February 14, 2008


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




<PAGE>