alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Morgans Foods, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
   Date: June 1, 2010
    /s/ Kenneth L. HignettKenneth L. HignettSenior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 30, 2021

No. 04-21-00181-CV

Robert CORLEY,

Appellant

v.

Timothy CORLEY, Jason Corley and Century Oaks Land LLC,

Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI02547

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, Robert Corley’s petition for permissive 

appeal is DENIED, and this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. Costs of 

this appeal are taxed against petitioner, Robert Corley.

It is so ORDERED on June 30, 2021.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of June, 2021.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-13995, 33-67940, 33-72438, 333-06025 and 333-88683) pertaining
to the Nashua Corporation 1987 Stock Option Plan, Nashua Corporation 1993 Stock
Incentive Plan, Nashua Corporation Employees' Savings Plan, Nashua Corporation
Amended 1996 Stock Incentive Plan and the Nashua Corporation 1999 Shareholder
Value Plan of our report dated February 6, 2002, except for the "Indebtedness
and Subsequent Event" Note to which the date is March 1, 2002, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Nashua Corporation
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the years ended December 31, 2001
and 2000.





                                                    ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Manchester, New Hampshire
March 15, 2002
EXHIBIT
32.2






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Magnitude Information Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Form 10-Q"),
I, Joerg H. Klaube, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, as of the
date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge, that the
Company's Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Form 10-Q, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 18, 2009
                  /s/
                  Joerg
      H. KlaubeJoerg
      H. Klaube, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund III, L.P. (the Registrant) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief
Executive Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS, III                              
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief Executive
Officer May 13, 2005



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS                              
|Douglas P. Williams Chief Financial
Officer May 13, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                              4,010
<SECURITIES>                       42,860
<RECEIVABLES>                     151,653
<ALLOWANCES>                        2,490
<INVENTORY>                       106,410
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  311,912
<PP&E>                            203,017
<DEPRECIATION>                    195,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    682,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             216,400
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                           56,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                        160,617
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      682,892
<SALES>                           618,735
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  618,735
<CGS>                             249,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     249,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  308,880
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 11,498
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    57,023
<INCOME-TAX>                       13,401
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                43,622
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                       43,622
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                        1.00
        

</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4673

To require warning labels on consumer products containing radio frequency 

identification devices, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2004

Mr. KLECZKA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To require warning labels on consumer products containing 

radio frequency identification devices, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Opt Out of ID Chips 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICA7 TION DEVICE IN RETAIL MERCHANDISE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 6 months after the 

9 date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Trade Com10 mission shall promulgate a rule under section 18(a) of the 
2

•HR 4673 IH 

1 Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)) pro2 viding that it shall be an unfair or deceptive act or practice 

3 under section 5 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 45) to sell at retail 

4 any product containing a radio frequency identification de5 vice (RFID) unless—

6 (1) such product bears a label meeting the re7 quirements of subsection (b); and 

8 (2) the person purchasing such product is pro9 vided with the option of having such device removed 

10 from the product or permanently disabled at the 

11 time of purchase. 

12 (b) REQUIREMENT FOR WARNING LABEL.—The 

13 product label required by subsection (a) shall—

14 (1) state, at a minimum, that the product con15 tains a radio frequency identification device, and 

16 that such device can be used to track the product 

17 and transmit unique identification information to an 

18 independent reader both before and after purchase; 

19 (2) notify the consumer of such consumer’s 

20 right to have such device removed from the product 

21 or permanently disabled at the time of purchase; and 

22 (3) be in a conspicuous type-size and location 

23 and in print that contrasts with the background 

24 against which it appears. 
3

•HR 4673 IH 

1 (c) DEFINITION.—In this Act, the term ‘‘radio fre2 quency identification device’’ (or ‘‘RFID’’) means a device 

3 that acts as a transponder and enables data to be trans4 mitted through a radio signal to a receiver and that is 

5 placed in a product to provide identification, tracking, or 

6 other information about the product or the consumer of 

7 the product.

Æ
exv10w3



 






Exhibit 10.3




FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

OF

ANSONIA APARTMENTS, L.P.




     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT, is dated as of February 1, 2002,
between PB ACQUISITION CORP. (“PB”), a Nevada corporation having an address at 1775 Broadway,
23rd Floor, New York 10019 and ANSONIA LLC (“ALLC”), a limited liability company having
an address at 346 Quinnipiac Street, 3rd Floor, Wallingford, CT 06492.



RECITALS




     A. PB and ALLC entered into a Limited Partnership Agreement dated as of November 25, 1997 (the
“LPA”) for the Delaware limited partnership known as Ansonia Apartments, L.P. (the “Partnership”).



     B. PB and ALLC wish to amend the LPA in certain respects.



AMENDMENT




     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuable
consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, PB and ALLC agree as
follows:



     1. Management Powers of the General Partner. The first sentence of Section 3.1.1 of
the LPA is hereby deleted, and is replaced with the following:




Subject only to the consent and approval rights afforded to ALLC elsewhere
in this Agreement, the General Partner shall be responsible for all
decisions with respect to any matter set forth in this Agreement or
otherwise affecting or arising out of the business of the Partnership, the
management, operation and control of the Partnership and its day-to-day
business affairs.



     2. Restrictions and Limitations on Powers of the General Partner. Section 3.2.2 of
the LPA is hereby amended to add the following:




	 	(i)	 	adopt or implement any operating budget for any of the
properties owned or directly or indirectly by the Partnership;
	 
	 	(ii)	 	change the managing agent or materially amend the management
agreement for any of the properties owned directly or indirectly by the
Partnership.






 









 








     3. Participation by Limited Partners. Section 3.3.1 of the LPA is hereby amended to
add the following clause to the beginning thereof:



     “Subject to the provisions of Section 3.2.2 and 8.1 of this Agreement,”



     4. No Further Modifications. Except for certain modifications to the LPA effected
pursuant to a letter agreement dated as of July 15, 2001, the LPA is unmodified and in full force
and effect.



     5. Definitions. All capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall
have the meanings ascribed to them in the LPA.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PB and ALLC have executed this Amendment as of the date first written
above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	PB ACQUISITION CORP.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Charles D. Rubenstein
 	 
	 	 	Charles D. Rubenstein, 	 
	 	 	Executive Vice President 	 
	 
	 	ANSONIA LLC

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Robert P. Rothenberg
 	 
	 	 	Robert P. Rothenberg, 	 
	 	 	Managing Member 	 
	 




2
Exhibit 32(a)

                 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of Jordan
Industries, Inc., an Illinois corporation (the "Registrant"), hereby certifies
that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended
June 30, 2005, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
ss.78m(a)) and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.

Date: December 14, 2005

/s/   John W. Jordan II
------------------------------------
John W. Jordan II
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4892

To establish that marriage in the United States consists only of the union 

of a man and a woman. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2004

Mr. ISTOOK (for himself, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. BAKER, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. BROWN of South Carolina, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. CULBERSON, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. 

DOOLITTLE, Mrs. EMERSON, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. GARRETT of 

New Jersey, Mr. GOODE, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. HERGER, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. LINDER, Mr. LUCAS

of Oklahoma, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. 

NORWOOD, Mr. PENCE, Mr. PITTS, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. 

SMITH of Michigan, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. WAMP, Mr. 

WELDON of Florida, Mr. WICKER, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. 

BRADY of Texas, and Mr. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To establish that marriage in the United States consists 

only of the union of a man and a woman.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MARRIAGE IN THE UNITED STATES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Marriage in the United States 

5 shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. 
2

•HR 4892 IH 

1 (b) JURISDICTION.—

2 (1) U.S. SUPREME COURT.—The Supreme 

3 Court of the United States shall have original juris4 diction to hear and determine a claim arising under 

5 this section. 

6 (2) OTHER COURTS.—Except as provided in 

7 paragraph (1), no Federal or State court shall have 

8 jurisdiction to hear or determine a claim arising 

9 under this section.

Æ
Secure testing of Open Source Projects 

Area of interest: Initial minimum requirements for testing software source code 

Open source adoption in the Industry has been increasing tremendously. While Open source software is crucial for 

innovation and agile development, it is also important to secure its procurement and ongoing use. 

Industry statistics show that there was 88% growth in application vulnerabilities over last two years. In 2018 alone, 

16,000 new vulnerabilities were disclosed. Moreover CVE/NVD misses many vulnerabilities, only accounting for 

60% of vulnerabilities tracked by curated databases. 

There are two broader categories of threats faced by open source software usage: 

- Known Security vulnerabilities (with CVE Published or disclosed by other curated databases) 

- New vulnerabilities being introduced into an open source package, but the vulnerability is not yet 

disclosed. 

There are many vendors exist that provide tools to detect and act on published vulnerabilities. We’re proposing an 

open source collaborative project to address the latter: detecting and preventing new vulnerabilities before they 

impact the industry. This not only improves security of enterprises consuming open source packages, but also 

empowers open-source developers in detecting and preventing security problems early. 

We’re proposing a pluggable and extendable infrastructure to security scan all open source packages. This 

infrastructure allows to add static code analysis tools, binary analysis tools or Fuzzing tools etc. 

These tools were used in the past by Security researchers in isolation to hunt for vulnerabilities, malicious files that 

contain similar known problems. Through this infrastructure, we’re able to identify quickly which packages contain 

malicious files that are like previously known malicious pieces of code. By including these in popular open source 

repositories and their workflow, package owners are alerted early in lifecycle. This system also allows Security 

researchers to share their knowledge to the open source community by adding new rules or findings on ongoing 

basis to this central system. 

We’re also proposing that open source code repositories should publish security metadata for all hosted open 

source packages so that data could be programmatically consumed by private, public and government sectors. This 

would include above proposed Scanning results and other relevant metadata that may impact security posture of 

underlying package like history of published vulnerabilities, mean time to remediate reported security bugs, 

frequency of commits etc.
#### Raymond I. COOK; Deborah Cook, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHELAN COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; Chelan County; Chelan County Prosecutor’s Office; Chelan County Jail; Kitsap County Sheriff's *528Department; Kitsap County WA; County Prosecutor’s Office; John Does, I and II; Gwinnett County; Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department; Ron Dobbins, Lt.; Howland, Deputy; Gwinnett County District Atty, Defendants, and Sherry Ellison, Asst. District Attorney, Gwinnett County; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 99-36045.

D.C. No. CV-95-05686-JKA.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2001.*

Decided May 25, 2001.

Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Raymond and Deborah Cook, husband and wife, appeal pro se the district court’s refusal to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over their state law claims. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. A court’s refusal to exercise supplemental jurisdiction is reviewed for abuse of discretion. *San Pedro Hotel Co. v. City of Los Angeles,*159 F.3d 470, 478 (9th Cir.1998) (citation omitted).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Cooks’ state law claims after it properly dismissed all claims over which it had original jurisdiction. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3); *Executive Software N. Am., Inc. v. United States Dist. Court,*24 F.3d 1545, 1555-56 (9th Cir.1994).

Appellants’ remaining contentions are not persuasive.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 OF NALCO
CHEMICAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                     38,100,000
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                             224,700,000
<ALLOWANCES>                              (4,400,000)
<INVENTORY>                                91,400,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          370,000,000
<PP&E>                                  1,101,600,000
<DEPRECIATION>                          (581,600,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,370,100,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     355,800,000
<BONDS>                                   221,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                   400,000
<COMMON>                                   15,100,000
<OTHER-SE>                                564,800,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,370,100,000
<SALES>                                 1,214,500,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1,214,500,000
<CGS>                                     531,300,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             531,300,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         16,200,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           213,400,000
<INCOME-TAX>                               77,700,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       135,700,000
<DISCONTINUED>                             18,000,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                              153,700,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    2.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.95


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
**Written Statement of thePresident and Chief Executive Officer****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350**
     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, theundersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Whitehall Limited, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter endedJune 30, 2004(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
*/s/ Ronald Mustari*Ronald Mustari