alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
We propose that Cyber Security Gaming and Simulations Cloud (CGSC) academies be built to 

prepare and train K12 teachers and students, and College faculty and students to prepare the 

workforce in Cyber Security, Cyber Science, Robotics, Sensors, Internet of Things (IoT) 

technologies, RFID, cognitive computing, machine learning, artificial intelligence and blockchain 

technology using gaming and simulations as a key knowledge acquisition, training technique 

and skill drilling method for overall cyber defense preparedness. We propose that partnerships 

be formed among Government, Universities, community colleges, supported by industry and 

community partners, to meet the needs of the communities all across USA. Moreover, we 

propose to addresses the severe and critical needs identified by both the Government and 

Private Sector for highly trained personnel in cyber security, cyber warfare, autonomous 

systems, radar and cyber communications, internet of things technologies and blockchain 

based security models in these cloud based cyber science academies. Over a 3-year period, we 

propose to implement an innovative and engaging (NICE based) curriculum that appeals to 

younger populations, students in middle and high schools, as well as college students.

The curriculum should be designed using robotics, sensors, cloud computing, cognitive 

computing, artificial intelligence, games and simulations as major components to be taught 

once a week (College Faculty and Students) and Saturday Academies (High School Teachers and 

Students) supported by a powerful academic cloud system. This would provide a good mix of 

hardware and software systems security as well as the need to collaborate with people, 

systems and processes in a secure distributed environment. In preparing the workforce to meet 

such challenges, Government recognizes the following as strategic areas where the shortage of 

highly trained personnel is severe and critical. These areas include cyber security, cyber science, 

cryptography, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, machine learning, internet of things and 

machines, Autonomous systems, Counter Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), Cyber Science 

and Technology, Data to Decisions Systems, Electronic Warfare/Electronic Protection, 

Engineered Resilient Systems and Human Systems among others..

From Dr. Robert Steven Owor, Albany State University

robert.owor@asurams.edu
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Gary L. Dreher, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of AMDL, Inc. for the period endedJune 30, 2006;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the small business issuer and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s fourth fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: August 15, 2006/s/ Gary L. Dreher
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BIO-LOK INTERNATIONAL INC. FOR THE 3 MONTH PERIOD ENDED
JULY 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-30-1999
<CASH>                                             770
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  542,181
<ALLOWANCES>                                   135,015
<INVENTORY>                                  1,217,992
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,625,928
<PP&E>                                         991,551
<DEPRECIATION>                                 793,508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,874,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          801,363
<BONDS>                                        426,894
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,523
<OTHER-SE>                                     594,550
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,874,330
<SALES>                                        424,675
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               425,425
<CGS>                                          173,095
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  172,348
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,834
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,994
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    40,994
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2005 (the Report) of Ruby Tuesday,
Inc. (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof, I, Samuel E. Beall, III, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                    |                                                                     
|------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:August 2, 2005 | /s/ Samuel E. Beall, III                                            
|                    | Samuel E. Beall, IIIChairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.1
   
  THE
MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906
 OF
THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Annual Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
   A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
The Monarch Cement Company and will be retained by The Monarch Cement Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
   
   Dated: 
March 16, 2010
  /s/ Walter H. Wulf,
Jr.
 Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
 President and Chairman of the
Board
Safety Commission Members

James P. Bagian, M.D., P.E.

Professor of Industrial and Operations 

Engineering; Co-Director, Center for Risk 

Analysis Informed Decision Engineering

University of Michigan

Darryl C. Hill, Ph.D., MBA, CSP

Senior Vice President, Safety and Security

First Group America

David A. Hofmann, Ph.D.

Hugh L. McColl Distinguished Professor of 

Leadership and Organizational Behavior,

Kenan-Flagler Business School

University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill

Craig A. Merlic, Ph.D.

Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry; Executive 

Director, The UC Center for Laboratory Safety

University of California, Los Angeles

Joseph M. Kolly, Ph.D.

Director, Transportation Innovation Center

MITRE Corporation

Allison Jones, MD, MS, 

FACOEM

Consultant, Occupational and 

Environmental Medicine

Mark Peters, Ph.D.

Executive Vice President

National Laboratory Management & Operations

Battelle Memorial Institute
Charge to the NIST Safety Commission

Charge to the commission:

Assess the state of NIST’s safety culture and how effectively the existing safety protocols and policies have 

been implemented across NIST.

The commission will evaluate:

• the quality and completeness of NIST safety directives and programs,

• the performance of safety protocols and the responses to recent incidents and near misses, and

• the impacts of the pandemic and hybrid work environment on safety.
Exhibit 10.1

 

AMENDMENT TO THE

TESARO, INC.

2012 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

 

The TESARO, Inc. 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, effective as of April 27, 2012, and as amended from time to time, (the “Plan”), is hereby amended to increase the number of shares of Stock authorized for issuance under the Plan by 2,000,000 shares, effective May 14, 2015, as follows:

 

1.              The following definition is hereby added to the Plan:

 

2.2          “Amendment Date” means May 14, 2015, the date the Plan was approved by the stockholders of the Company.

 

2.              Section 4.1 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

 

As of the Effective Date, and subject to such additional shares of Stock as shall be available for issuance under the Plan pursuant to Section 4.2, and subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 16, the maximum number of shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall be equal to the sum of (x) one million, four hundred twenty-eight thousand, five hundred seventy-one(1) (1,428,571) shares of Stock plus (y) the number of shares of Stock available for future awards under the Prior Plan as of the Effective Date plus (z) the number of shares of Stock related to awards outstanding under the Prior Plan as of the Effective Date which thereafter terminate by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation, or otherwise without the issuance of such shares.  In addition, the number of shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall be automatically increased on January 1 of each year, commencing with 2014, by a number of shares of Stock equal to the lesser of (i) 4% of the shares of Stock outstanding at such time, or (ii) the number of shares of Stock determined by our Board (the “Annual Increase”).  As of the Amendment Date, two million (2,000,000) shares shall be added to the one million, four hundred twenty-eight thousand, five hundred seventy-one (1,428,571) shares set forth in clause (x) above in this paragraph, and the Annual Increases shall continue as before, effective January 1, 2016.

 

The shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan may be authorized and unissued shares of Stock or treasury shares of Stock or any combination of the foregoing, as may be determined from time to time by the Board or by the Committee.  Any of the shares of Stock reserved and available for issuance under the Plan may be used for any type of Award under the Plan, provided, however, that with respect to Incentive Stock Options six million, three hundred thirty-five thousand, six hundred seventy-three (6,335,673) shares of Stock shall be available for issuance.

 

3.              Except as amended above, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

 




(1)           For the avoidance of doubt, this number reflects the implementation of a 1 for 3.50 reverse stock split of the Company’s Stock effective as of June 18, 2012.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 147 

To provide that professional baseball teams, and leagues composed of such 

teams, shall be subject to the antitrust laws. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. DUNCAN (for himself, Mr. BIGGS, and Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide that professional baseball teams, and leagues 

composed of such teams, shall be subject to the antitrust 

laws. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Teddy Roosevelt Fair 

5 Competition and Public Trust Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDING. 

7 The Congress finds that the business of providing for 

8 profit public baseball games between teams of professional 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 147 IH

1 baseball players in a league and between such teams of 

2 rival leagues is in, or affects, interstate commerce. 

3 SEC. 3. APPLICATION OF ANTITRUST LAWS TO PROFES4 SIONAL BASEBALL. 

5 The antitrust laws shall apply to the business of pro6 viding for profit public baseball games between teams of 

7 professional baseball players and to leagues composed of 

8 teams of professional baseball players. 

9 SEC. 4. DEFINITION. 

10 For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘antitrust laws’’ 

11 has the meaning given it in subsection (a) of the first sec12 tion of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12(a)), except that 

13 such term includes section 5 of the Federal Trade Com14 mission Act (15 U.S.C. 45) to the extent that such section 

15 5 relates to unfair methods of competition. 

16 SEC. 5. APPLICATION OF SECTION 3. 

17 Section 3 shall not apply with respect to conduct oc18 curring before the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

June 15, 2015

ABELACOSTA, CLERK

STATE OF TEXAS

VS.

RONNIE DABNEY

NO. PD-1514-14

PD-1514-14

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 6/15/2015 12:44:42 PM

Accepted 6/15/2015 1:31:56 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

§ IN THE COURT OF

§

§ CRIMINAL APPEALS

§

THIRD MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes RONNIE DABNEY, appellee in the above styled and numbered

cause, and moves for an extension oftime until June 15, 2015 to file a brief and for

good cause shows the following:

1. This Court granted Appellant's The State of Texas Petition for

Discretionary Review. The brief in support of Appellant's petition was due 30

days thereafter. See Tex. R. App. Proc. 70.1. On or about May 1, 2015,

Appellee received a notice by electronic filing that Appellant's (The State of

Texas) had not been filed in a timely fashion. This caused confusion to counsel for

Appellee as he believed that the State's brief had been rejected for some reason.

Accordingly, Appellee's counsel was waiting for Appellant to submit another brief

before responding and filing Appellee's brief. The Court granted an extension to

June 1, 2015 to file the brief. However,

2. Additionally, Counsel has been unable to complete the brief for the
following reasons:

1. From March 23, 2015 to April 21, 2015, counsel with the

assistance of the Texas Lawyer's Assistance Program entered into an alcohol

rehabilitation facility in Austin, Texas. Counsel was out of the office until April

22,2015. After being gone for a month, counsel was way behind. Counsel has

had trial settings and contested hearings since his release from rehab.

Additionally, counsel was in trial from May 18, 2015 to May 28, 2015 on a

medical malpractice jury trial in the 78th District Court of Wichita County, Texas.

The trial required extensive pre-trial preparations. Because counselwas out ofthe

office for approximately 7 weeks durig the last 2 Vi months, he has been catching

up on his obligations.

3. Counsel has e-filed the brief today. Counsel requests an extension

until today.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, appellant respectfully

requests an extension until June 15, 2015, to file a brief in support of Petition for

Discretionary Review.
Respectfully submitted,

Mark Barber, Attorney at Law

900 8th Street, Suite 116

Wichita Falls, TX 76301

Tel: (940) 761-3009

Fax:(940)761-4060

By:/s/Mark H. Barber

Mark H. Barber

State Bar No. 01708050

Mbarberlaw@aol.com

Attorney for RONNIE DABNEY

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on June 15, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above

and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Wichita

County, Texas, by electronic service through the Electronic Filing Manager.

Mark H. Barber

Mark H. Barber
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

This is to certify that on June 2, 2015,1 conferred with the Assistant District

Attorney who is handling the appeal for the State of Texas and he advised that he

has no position on this motion but will leave it to the Court to decide.

Is/Mark H. Barber
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 486 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 486

 To require the Food and Drug Administration to establish restrictions 
 regarding the qualifications of physicians to prescribe the abortion 
                     drug commonly known as RU-486.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2003

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Food and Drug Administration to establish restrictions 
 regarding the qualifications of physicians to prescribe the abortion 
                     drug commonly known as RU-486.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``RU-486 Patient Health and Safety 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF RESTRICTIONS REGARDING PRESCRIBING OF CERTAIN 
              ABORTION DRUG.

    With respect to the application that was submitted under section 
505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for the drug 
mifepristone (commonly referred to as RU-486, marketed as MIFEPREX), 
and that was approved on September 28, 2000, the Secretary of Health 
and Human Services, acting through the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 
shall promptly modify the conditions of the approval of such drug to 
establish the additional restriction that the drug may not be 
prescribed by any person other than a licensed physician who meets the 
following requirements:
            (1) The physician is qualified to handle complications 
        resulting from an incomplete abortion or ectopic pregnancy.
            (2) The physician has been trained to perform surgical 
        abortions and has met all applicable legal requirements to 
        perform such abortions.
            (3) The physician is certified for ultrasound dating of 
        pregnancy and detecting ectopic pregnancy.
            (4) The physician has completed a program regarding the 
        prescribing of such drug that uses a curriculum approved by the 
        Secretary.
            (5) The physician has admitting privileges at a hospital to 
        which the physician can travel in one hour or less, determined 
        on the basis of starting at the principal medical office of the 
        physician and traveling to the hospital, using the 
        transportation means normally used by the physician to travel 
        to the hospital, and under the average conditions of travel for 
        the physician.
                                 <all>
```