alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

SECTION 302CERTIFICATION

 

I,Raymond J. Pacini, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of California CoastalCommunities, Inc.;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

(a)          designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

(b)         evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a)          allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)         any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date:November 4, 2004

 
|   | /s/ Raymond J. Pacini    | * * |
|--------|--------------------------|----------|
|   | Raymond  J. Pacini       |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
#### THE STATE v. BRIDGES, Appellant.

Division Two,

November 17, 1903.

Where an appellant fails to file a bill of exceptions within the time allowed, and no errors appear in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Appeal from Wayne Circuit Court — Ho». *Frank B. Bearing,*Judge.

Affirmed.

*Edward C. Crow,*Attorney-General, for the State.

GANTT, P. J.

At the February term, 1899, of the Wayne Circuit Court, the defendant Calvin Bridges was indicted by the grand jury for the crime of incest with his granddaughter. At the same term he was duly arraigned and entered his plea of not guilty, and at the same term he was tried and convicted and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary. In due time he filed his motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment, which were heard and overruled. Thereupon he obtained leave of the court to file a bill of exceptions within ninety days, and took his appeal to this court. He entered into a recognizance to prosecute said appeal, and to abide the judgment of this court on said appeal. He failed to file any bill of exceptions within the time allowed by the order of the court, and the clerk thereupon, as in duty bound, certified the record to this court.

The defendant is not represented in this court by counsel, but, as required by statute we have examined the record proper, and find no error in the impaneling of either the grand or petit juries, or in the indictment, *699or in the proceedings and sentence of the court, and the judgment and sentence of the circuit court of Wayne county is therefore affirmed.

*Burgess*and *Fox, JJ.,*concur.
AO 245D (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations (6918)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE

V. (For Revocation of Supervised Release)

EPPIE LANAE FARRIS

CASE NUMBER: 1:05-CR-00264-001 

 USM NUMBER: 08465-003

 Peter J. Madden, Esquire 

Defendant's Attorney

THE DEFENDANT:

(X) admitted guilt to violation of supervision condition: Mandatory Condition as set out in petition

dated June 8, 2006 

( ) was found in violation of supervision condition(s): 

Date violation

Violation Number Nature of Violation Occurred

Mandatory Condition Technical

The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 2 of this judgment. The sentence is

imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.

( ) The defendant has not violated condition(s) and is discharged as to such violation(s)

condition.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States Attorney for this

district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution,

costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid.

Defendant's Social Security No.: 4404 

Defendant's Date of Birth: 1980 

Defendant's Residence Address:

Prichard, AL 

 

Defendant's Mailing Address:

 

 

July 10, 2006

Date of Imposition of Judgment

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

July 18, 2006

Date

Case 1:05-cr-00264-CG-C Document 30 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 2
Judgment 2

AO 245D (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations: Sheet 2 - Imprisonment

Defendant: EPPIE LANAE FARRIS

Case Number: 1:05-CR-00264-001

IMPRISONMENT

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be

imprisoned for a total term of TWENTY-FOUR (24) MONTHS. Said term to run concurrently with the

sentence imposed in CR-03-116-WS .

(X) The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons: That the defendant

be imprisoned at an institution where a residential, comprehensive, substance abuse treatment

program is available.

(X) The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

( ) The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district:

( ) at .m. on .

( ) as notified by the United States Marshal.

( ) The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of

Prisons:

( ) before 2 p.m. on .

( ) as notified by the United States Marshal.

( ) as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office.

RETURN

I have executed this judgment as follows:

Defendant delivered on to at 

with a certified copy of this judgment.

 UNITED STATES MARSHAL 

 By: 

 Deputy U.S. Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00264-CG-C Document 30 Filed 07/18/06 Page 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BIR BAHADUR BASNET,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-73815

Agency No. A099-910-284

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 22, 2015** 

Before: GOODWIN, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

 Bir Bahadur Basnet, a native and citizen of Nepal, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

FILED

APR 29 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility

determinations created by the REAL ID Act, and we review de novo questions of

law. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40, 1048 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny

the petition for review. 

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility determination,

based on the BIA’s finding that Basnet’s misrepresentations regarding his wife’s

name on his visa application and to immigration officials significantly undermined

his credibility. See Singh v. Holder, 638 F.3d 1264, 1272 (9th Cir. 2010) (“lies and

fraudulent documents when they are no longer necessary for the immediate escape

from persecution do support an adverse inference”); Zamonov v. Holder, 649 F.3d

969, 974 (9th Cir. 2011) (agency not compelled to accept petitioner’s explanations

for discrepancies). In the absence of credible testimony, Basnet’s asylum and

withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156

(9th Cir. 2003).

Because Basnet’s CAT claim is based on the same testimony the BIA found

not credible, and Basnet does not point to any other evidence that compels the

conclusion that it is more likely than not he will be tortured if returned to Nepal, 

2 12-73815
his CAT claim also fails. See id. at 1156–57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

3 12-73815
#### James W. Smith, Admr., *v.*Charles Alexander, Admr.

Money Received — Money on Deposit by Attorney.

■ Where an attorney received money which belonged to another and deposited it in a bank to his own account, and died leaving a portion of it on deposit in the bank, the person so entitled to it may have it applied to the satisfaction of his claim.

APPEAL FROM WOODRUFF CIRCUIT COURT.

December 16, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

W. W. George, as garnishee on balance of a judgment of the Woodford Circuit Court in the consolidated suits of *J. E. McCoun,*
      *368
      *et al. v. J. S. Whittington et al.,*gave to J. E. Hoskins, attorney for appellant, his check on the banking house of J. Amsden, etc., for $237.13. The check was payable to J. E. Hoskins, attorney, J. H. Smith, Admr., or order, dated August 7, 1872. On the same day, said George paid to J. E. Hoskins, by a check on the same bank, in his own right, $102.14, the amount adjudged to him' in the consolidated suits before named. On the day after said -checks were drawn, Hoskins presented them to the bank and had the amount of each check placed to his own credit on the books of the bank, which made the sum of $339.27. At that time Hoskins had no other money to his credit in said bank, nor afterwards. He commenced drawing on that fund on the day it was placed to his credit, and continued up to the 20th of the same month, when there remained in the bank only $179.48. On the 9th of September, 1872, Hoskins died insolvent, leaving the last named sum in said bank to his credit. Smith, as administrator, claims it, and Hoskins’ administrator resists-the claim.

*Porter & Wallace, for appellant.*

-, *for appellee.*

J. K. Hoskins, son of the intestate, proved that in the summer of 1872 (in August he thought), he heard his father say that there was a sum of money about $178 to his credit in the bank of Ams-den, etc., and he could draw every cent of it if he wished to do so; but it was not for Jimmie Smith; and in reply to the question whether he had or not some money in bank, he said yes, but it belonged to some other man.

The identity of the fund is fixed by the evidence. Smith’s money was paid to him by George in a check, which on its face showed whose money it was, and although Hoskins had it placed on the books of the bank to his own credit, he said the money was not his, that it belonged to another person, that it was for Smith. The money having been thus identified in the hands of the banker, Smith can follow it there, and have it applied to the satisfaction of his claim against Whittington, etc.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to adjudge the $179.48 to the credit of J. E. Hos-kins on the books of the bank of Amsden, etc., to appellant and for further proceedings, consistent herewith.
Document #11 A Model Policy for Friction Ridge Examiner 

Professional Conduct, Ver. 2.0

Date of First Issue 09/12/08 Current Issue Date 11/14/12

Web Posting Date 11/24/12

Date of Last Review N/A Date of Next Review 09-2013 Appendix present/Letter No

1 of 2

Document #11

A Model Policy for Friction Ridge Examiner Professional Conduct

(Latent/Tenprint)

1. Practitioners of the friction ridge examination discipline shall regard themselves as members of a noble and 

honorable profession. It is their duty to serve the interests of justice to the best of their abilities at all times. 

They will be guided by those practices and procedures that are generally recognized within the profession to 

be consistent with a high level of professionalism. Their motives, methods, and actions shall at all times be 

above reproach and consistent with proper ethical conduct. Professional conduct contrary to the principles 

outlined in this model policy should be referred to an appropriate enforcement authority.

2. Practitioners shall cooperate with other forensic science professionals in order to promote the advancement 

of the friction ridge examination discipline through scientific research. Knowledge of any new discoveries, 

developments or techniques applicable to the friction ridge examination discipline shall be shared with the 

peer community.

3. Practitioners shall not undertake examinations or offer testimony if unqualified to do so.

4. Qualifications of expertise are based on knowledge, skill, education, experience and training, and shall not be 

misrepresented by the practitioner.

5. Examinations shall be conducted utilizing accepted scientific techniques and methods which are reliable, 

accurate and used with appropriate standards and controls.

6. Techniques and opinions shall be based on facts and interpretations and shall not be knowingly 

misrepresented.

7. Testimony shall be rendered in an impartial manner to promote the understanding of examinations and 

findings.

8. Privileged communications shall be kept confidential.
Document #11 A Model Policy for Friction Ridge Examiner 

Professional Conduct, Ver. 2.0

Date of First Issue 09/12/08 Current Issue Date 11/14/12

Web Posting Date 11/24/12

Date of Last Review N/A Date of Next Review 09-2013 Appendix present/Letter No

2 of 2

9. Revision Table

Version Effective Start Effective End Posted Archived Change

1.0 9/12/08 11/14/12 9/12/08 11/14/12 Original issue

2.0 11/14/12 N/A 11/24/12 N/A No change to content

Reformatted (start of new 

version number)
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30,  2004 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:   August 9, 2004               /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                     Name:   Robert A. Bourne
                                     Title:  President and Treasurer

                                    A signed original of this written  statement
                                    required by Section 906 has been provided to
                                    CNL  Income  Fund  VI,  Ltd.   and  will  be
                                    retained  by CNL Income  Fund VI,  Ltd.  and
                                    furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
                                    Commission or its staff upon request.
device add env MonoFlipper1
device add env MonoFlipper2
device add env AnalyzerFlipper1
device add env AnalyzerFlipper2
device add env SampleField1
device add env SampleField3
device add env MonoGuide
device add env AnalyzerGuide
device setproperty SampleField3 setVoltage 36
device add alias EIflip MonoFlipper1
device add alias EIcancel MonoFlipper2
device add alias EFflip AnalyzerFlipper1
device add alias EFcancel AnalyzerFlipper2
device add alias Vsample SampleField1
device add alias Hsample SampleField3
device add alias EIguide MonoGuide
device add alias EFguide AnalyzerGuide
IFOpen He3nmr
IFTalk He3nmr "He3PolEnabled()"
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.2

                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

  We hereby consent to all references to Ryder Scott Company, L.P. and/or the
reports prepared by Ryder Scott Company, L.P. entitled, "Estimated Future
Reserves and Income Attributable to Certain Leasehold Interests SEC Case as of
December 31, 1997 and 1998" and "Estimated Future Reserves and Income
Attributable to Certain Leasehold and Royalty Interests SEC Case as of
December 31, 1999" in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                          RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

March 1, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              Jul-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                           6,381
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,291,088
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (290,129)
<INVENTORY>                                    663,382
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,775,330
<PP&E>                                       4,578,532
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,270,185)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,112,633
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,671,135
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     13,500
<COMMON>                                        16,831
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,087,232
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,112,633
<SALES>                                      4,155,736
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,155,736
<CGS>                                        2,490,757
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,490,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,519,855
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             122,640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                145,124
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,484
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,484
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Furnished Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Southern Investors Service Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December
31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Walter M. Mischer, Sr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Walter M. Mischer, Sr.Name:

Walter M. Mischer, Sr.Title:

Chief Executive OfficerDate:

April 15, 2005




A signed original of this
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Southern Investors Service Company, Inc. and will be retained by Southern Investors Service Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                                OF TERESA J. BRAY

      This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the "Amendment  Agreement"),
effective as of November 29, 2005, is by and between  Medical Media  Television,
Inc., a Florida  corporation with a mailing address of 8406 Benjamin Road, Suite
C, Tampa,  Florida  33634 (the  "Company"),  and Teresa J. Bray,  an  individual
maintaining a mailing address of Post Office Box 93037, Lakeland,  Florida 33804
("Employee").

      WHEREAS,  an  Employment  Agreement  was entered into on November 16, 2005
under which the Employee would receive an increase in her rate of pay; and

      WHEREAS,  the Company is still  reliant upon  investment  funds until such
time as operating revenues begin;

      NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

      1.    Salary   Adjustment:   The  Company  and  Employee  agree  that  the
            Employee's  current  annual  salary of $80,000 will remain in effect
            until such time as the increased  salary of $118,400 as set forth in
            the  Employment  Agreement  can  be  paid  through  cash  flow  from
            operations of the Company.

      All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed the Agreement on the day and
year first written above.

                                         "COMPANY"

                                         MEDICAL MEDIA TELEVISION, INC.


                                         By: /s/ Philip M. Cohen
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                 Philip M. Cohen, President


                                        "EMPLOYEE"

                                         /s/ Teresa J. Bray
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                             Teresa J. Bray