alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Sean M. Cary, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Willamette Valley
Vineyards Inc.

By:    /s/ Sean M. Cary
Name: Sean M. Cary
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of FMS Financial  Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30, 2003 (the
"Report")  as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof, we, Craig W. Yates,  President and Chief Executive Officer, and Channing
L. Smith,  Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Date:  November 13, 2003



/s/Craig W. Yates                                    /s/Channing L. Smith
-----------------------                              -----------------------
Craig W. Yates                                       Channing L. Smith
President and Chief Executive Officer                Vice President  and
                                                     Chief Financial Officer



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Abiodun S. BASHORUN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-6169.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 17, 2001.

Decided May 11, 2001.

Abiodun S. Bashorun, pro se. Barbara Sales, Office of The United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURLAM.

Abiodun S. Bashorun seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *United States v. Bashorun,*Nos. CR-96-177; CA-00-2563-CCB (D. Md. filed Jan. 11, 2001; entered Jan. 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, David T. Nguyen, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual reporton Form 10-K/A of The InterGroup Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: August 24, 2012	

 

/s/ David T. Nguyen

David T. Nguyen

Treasurer and Controller

(Principal Financial Officer)
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 145 

To prevent the Federal Communications Commission from repromulgating 

the Fairness Doctrine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. DUNCAN (for himself and Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prevent the Federal Communications Commission from 

repromulgating the Fairness Doctrine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reassuring that the 

5 United States Has Wide And Scrupulous Rhetorical In6 sight to Garnish Honest Thought Act of 2023’’ or the 

7 ‘‘RUSH WAS RIGHT Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 145 IH

1 SEC. 2. FAIRNESS DOCTRINE PROHIBITED. 

2 Title III of the Communications Act of 1934 is 

3 amended by inserting after section 303 (47 U.S.C. 303) 

4 the following new section: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 303A. LIMITATION ON GENERAL POWERS: FAIRNESS 

6 DOCTRINE. 

7 ‘‘Notwithstanding section 303 or any other provision 

8 of this Act or any other Act authorizing the Commission 

9 to prescribe rules, regulations, policies, doctrines, stand10 ards, or other requirements, the Commission shall not 

11 have the authority to prescribe any rule, regulation, policy, 

12 doctrine, standard, or other requirement that has the pur13 pose or effect of reinstating or repromulgating (in whole 

14 or in part) the requirement that broadcasters present op15 posing viewpoints on controversial issues of public impor16 tance, commonly referred to as the ‘Fairness Doctrine’, 

17 as repealed in General Fairness Doctrine Obligations of 

18 Broadcast Licensees, 50 Fed. Reg. 35418 (1985).’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4608 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4608

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic located in 
 Peoria, Illinois, as the ``Bob Michel Department of Veterans Affairs 
                          Outpatient Clinic''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4608

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To name the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic located in 
 Peoria, Illinois, as the ``Bob Michel Department of Veterans Affairs 
                          Outpatient Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC, 
              PEORIA, ILLINOIS.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic located in 
Peoria, Illinois, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be 
known and designated as the ``Bob Michel Department of Veterans Affairs 
Outpatient Clinic''. Any reference to such outpatient clinic in any 
law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United 
States shall be considered to be a reference to the Bob Michel 
Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 21, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Granite Broadcasting Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the periodended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the Form 10-Q), we, W. Don Cornwell and Lawrence I. Wills,Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuantsection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of ourknowledge:

 

(i)                   the Form 10-Q fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(ii)                the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated: May 12, 2005.

 
|   | /s/                     | W.  DON CORNWELL   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|   | W. Don Cornwell         |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                    |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/                     | LAWRENCE  I. WILLS |   |
|   | Lawrence I. Wills       |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
exhibit10_2


		
			CONSENT TO ACTION OF THE 
		

		
			ESOP ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
		

		
			OF
		

		
			APPVION, INC.
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			The undersigned, being all of the members of the ESOP Administrative Committee of Appvion, Inc. (the “Committee”), hereby consent to the following actions without a formal meeting of the Committee:
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS the Board of Directors of Appvion, Inc., by resolution dated December 5, 2007, granted the ESOP Administrative Committee the authority to adopt non-material amendments to the Appvion, Inc. Retirement Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “Plan”); and
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan so as to delete Section 1.17(c), to read as set forth in Exhibit A (“Amendment Number One”), effective January 1, 2015.
		

		
			 
		

		
			NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Committee does hereby approve and authorize the execution, delivery and adoption of Amendment Number One.
		

		
			 
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same document, executed this Consent to Action on this 14th day of January 2015.
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			_/s/ Mark R. Richards____________________
		

		
			Mark R. Richards
		

		
			 
		

		
			_/s/ Thomas J. Ferree____________________
		

		
			Thomas J. Ferree
		

		
			 
		

		
			_/s/ Kerry S. Arent______________________
		

		
			Kerry S. Arent
		

		
			 
		

		
			_/s/ Tami L. Van Straten_________________
		

		
			Tami L. Van Straten
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		

		

		 


		

			

		


			DB1/ 81470141.1

		


		

			 

		


		

			DB1/ 81470141.1

		


		

			 

		


		



 

		Exhibit A
		

		
			 
		

		
			AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
		

		
			TO THE
		

		
			APPVION, INC. RETIREMENT SAVINGS AND
		

		
			EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
		

		
			(Amended and Restated Generally Effective as of January 1, 2014)
		

		
			 
		

		
			Effective as of January 1, 2015, Section 1.17(c) of the Plan is hereby deleted and Section 1.17(d) is renumbered as Section 1.17(c).
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		 


		

			

		


			DB1/ 81470141.1

		


		

			 

		


		

			DB1/ 81470141.1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MICHAEL HELLER,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 322 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of December, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
|   | 1. | The      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November      9, 2009 | /s/ Lee W.      Hendrickson                                                                Lee      W. HendricksonChief      Financial Officer |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aphton Corporation
(the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick T. Mooney, M.D., Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Patrick T. Mooney, M.D.          
|                       |  |     |  | Patrick T. Mooney, M.D.              
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                       |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Koerner et al. *v.*Baldwin.

*Appeal.—Supreme*Court.—Notice.—Where part of several co-parties appeal to the Supreme Court,-but do not serve notice of appeal upon all the other co-parties, and file proof thereof with the clerk of the Supreme Court, the appeal will be dismissed by said court.

APPEAL from the Marion Superior Court.

*W. W. Leathers, R. H. Hall,*and *A. Seidensticker,*for appellants.

*C. H Test, D. V. Bums,*and *G. S. Wright,*for appellee.

Downey, J.

This appeal is taken and the errors assigned by only a part of the judgment defendants, without a compliance with section 551, 2 G. & H. 270, and for that reason must be dismissed. *Kirby*v. *Holmes,*6 Ind. 33.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

GABRIELLE AYALA, as legal guardian for )

GERNON NEWSOME, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-3693

)

FLORIDA HOLDINGS III, LLC, 3865 )

TAMPA ROAD LLC, d/b/a WEST BAY OF )

TAMPA; and MAYA PEREZ, )

)

Appellees. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed September 9, 2020.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 

from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; 

Amy M. Williams, Judge.

Nicole M. Ziegler, Matthew D. Emerson 

and Wesley T. Straw of Emerson Straw, 

PL, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Thomas A. Valdez of Quintairos, Prieto, 

Wood & Boyer, P.A., Tampa, for 

Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
<page>					      EXHIBIT 31.01



CERTIFICATIONS


I, Jeffrey A. Rothman, President of Demeter Management Corporation
("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and

<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of Demeter's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.









Date:   November 14, 2003     /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman
                                 Jeffrey A. Rothman
                                 President,
                                 Demeter Management Corporation,
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                  US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                           1,016,632
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,511,686
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (230,038)
<INVENTORY>                                        354,880
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,306,339
<PP&E>                                          11,192,558
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (4,334,286)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,917,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,988,242
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,516
<OTHER-SE>                                        (583,393)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,917,557
<SALES>                                          4,565,840
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,218,909
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,374,918
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,034,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 408,149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (117,396)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (73,635)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (117,396)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.03)
        


</TABLE>
#### In re William T. DAVIS, Jr., Petitioner.

No. 01-6329.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 20, 2001.

Decided March 26, 2001.

*70William T. Davis, Jr., Petitioner pro se.

■Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

William T. Davis, Jr., filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay in the district court in acting upon his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) motion. The district court has entered a final order denying relief on Davis’ § 2255 motion. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition' as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately addressed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED AS MOOT.*
10884.

#### Southern Railway Company *v.*Hunt.

Decided April 7, 1920.

Certiorari; from Hall superior court — Judge J. B. Jones. July 26, 1919.

*E. A. Neely, C. R. Faulkner, J. O. Adams, Ed. Quillian,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. N. Oliver,*contra.

Stephens, J.

While the transferee of an “order notify” hill of lading, after paying the draft attached and obtaining possession of the bill of lading and thus acquiring the legal title to the goods mentioned therein, may maintain a suit against the carrier for any shortage in the shipment, occasioned subsequently to the transfer of title and before delivery to him, where such shortage is traced to the carrier, yet where in such a suit the bill of lading does not appear in evidence, and there is no evidence of any admission upon the part of the carrier as to the amount of goods received by it from the consignor, or other evidence tending to prove the amount of goods in the possession of the carrier and delivered to the transferee, the latter, although proving title to the goods shipped and received, fails to prove any loss or damage to the shipment accruing after he had obtained title thereto.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*