alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 3.1

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
                         CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
                          BLACK WARRIOR WIRELINE CORP.


         Black Warrior  Wireline  Corp.,  a  corporation  organized and existing
under and by virtue of the  General  Corporation  Law of the State of  Delaware,
does hereby certify:

         FIRST:  That at a Meeting of the Board of  Directors  of Black  Warrior
Wireline Corp., resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment
to  the  Certificate  of  Incorporation  of  said  Corporation,  declaring  said
amendment  to be  advisable  and calling a meeting of the  stockholders  of said
Corporation  for  consideration  thereof or  directing  that said  amendment  be
submitted to  stockholders  for action without a meeting by consents in writing.
The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

         RESOLVED,  that Article Fourth of the Certificate of  Incorporation  of
         the Corporation be hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                  FOURTH:  The total number of shares of Capital Stock which the
         Corporation  shall  have  authority  to issue is  Twelve  Million  Five
         Hundred  Thousand  (12,500,000)  shares,  of a par value of $.0005  per
         share.

         SECOND:  That  thereafter,  pursuant  to  resolution  of its  Board  of
Directors, a meeting of the stockholders of said Corporation was duly called and
held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General  Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware,  at which  meeting the  necessary  number of shares as
required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

         THIRD:  That said  amendment  was duly adopted in  accordance  with the
provisions  of  Section  242 of the  General  Corporation  Law of the  State  of
Delaware.

         FOURTH: That the capital of said Corporation shall not be reduced under
or by reason of said amendment.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  said Black Warrior Wireline Corp. has caused this
Certificate  to be signed by  William L.  Jenkins,  its  President,  and John A.
McNiff, Sr., its Secretary, this 21st day of July, 1997.


Attest:                                             Black Warrior Wireline Corp.

/s/ John A. McNiff                  /s/ William L. Jenkins
-----------------------------       -------------------------------------
John A. McNiff, Sr., Secretary              William L. Jenkins, President
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual Report on Form 10-K of Monmouth Capital Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Eugene W. Landy, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Anna T. Chew, as Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

















By:       /s/ Eugene W. Landy

Name:  Eugene W. Landy

Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:   March 10, 2006













By:       /s/ Anna T. Chew

Name:  Anna T. Chew

Title:    Chief Financial Officer

Date:    March 10, 2006
Exhibit 10.28


 


AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO AMENDED
AND RESTATED SEVERANCE PLAN


 


The Amended and Restated EXCO Resources, Inc.
Severance Plan effective as of August 17, 2004 (the “Severance
Plan”) is hereby amended pursuant to Section Nine of the
Severance Plan as of September 30, 2005 as follows:


 


1.                                       All capitalized terms used herein but not
defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Severance Plan.


 


2.                                       Section 3.3 is hereby amended by
adding the following paragraph as the last paragraph of such section:


 


“Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, in no event
shall the following constitute a “Change of Control”: (i) the buyout
transaction contemplated by that certain Stock Purchase Agreement, by and among
EXCO Holdings II, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Holdings
II”), and the stockholders of EXCO Holdings Inc., and any of
the transactions contemplated thereby and effected therewith and (ii) a
merger of Holdings II with EXCO Holdings Inc. after consummation of such
buyout transaction.”


 


3.                                       Except as expressly amended by this
amendment, the Severance Plan shall continue in full force and effect in
accordance with the provisions thereof.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, EXCO Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) has caused this instrument
to be executed as of September 30, 2005, by its Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to prior action taken by the Board of Directors of
the Company.


 


 


	
   

  	
  EXCO Resources, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/  J. DOUGLAS RAMSEY

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  J. Douglas Ramsey, Ph.D.

  
	
   

  	
  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|    |                                                                                 |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of GP Strategies Corporation; |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|                                                      |
|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                      |
| Date: April 29, 2020                                 |
|                                                 |
| /s/ Michael R. Dugan                                 |
| Michael R. Dugan                                     |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 21
 Direct and Indirect Subsidiaries, and Operating Divisions,
of Myers Industries, Inc.  As of December 31, 2009
 North and Central American Operations
 Ameri-Kart Corp.
    
    Kansas WEK South Corp
    
    North CarolinaAmeri-Kart (MI) Corp.
    
    MichiganBuckhorn Inc.
    
    Ohio BRP Hannibal Inc.
    
    MissouriGrower Express Trucking, Inc.
    
    OhioJMKO Corp.
    
    Missouri AC Buckhorn LLC (50%)
    
    MissouriLone Star Plastics, Inc.
    
    Nevada Amerikan LLC (100%)
    
    Florida Kord USA, Inc.
    
    South Carolina Texan Polymer Group, Inc.
    
    Texas WhiteRidge Plastics, LLC
    
    North CarolinaMYE Automotive, Inc.
    
    Delaware MRP, Inc.
    
    Michigan WEK Industries, Inc.
    
    DelawareMYE Canada Operations Inc.
    
    CanadaMYEcap Financial Corp.
    
    OhioMYELux, LLC
    
    OhioMyers do Brasil Embalagens Plasticas Ltda.
    
    BrazilMyers Tire Supply International, Inc.
    
    Ohio Myers de El Salvador S.A. De C.V. (75%)
    
    El Salvador Orientadores Comerciales S.A.
    
    Guatemala Myers de Panama S.A.
    
    Panama Myers TSCA, S.A.
    
    PanamaMyers de El Salvador S.A. De C.V. (25%)
    
    El SalvadorMyers Missouri, Inc.
    
    Missouri AC Buckhorn LLC (50%)
    
    MissouriMyers Tire Supply Distribution, Inc.
    
    OhioMyers Tire Supply.com, Inc.
    
    OhioPatch Rubber Company
    
    North Carolina Kwik Patch Private Ltd. (39.98%)
    
    IndiaProductivity California, Inc.
    
    California




---



##### 



EXHIBIT 21 continued
 Direct and Indirect Subsidiaries, and Operating Divisions,
of Myers Industries, Inc.  As of December 31, 2009
 Reported Operating Divisions of Myers Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 Akro-Mils (of Myers Industries, Inc.)
    
    Akron, OhioDillen Products (of Myers Industries, Inc.)
    
    Middlefield, OhioMolded Solutions (of Buckhorn Rubber Products Inc.)
    
    Mebane, NCMyers Tire Supply (of Myers Industries, Inc.)
    
    Akron, OhioBuckhorn Canada (of MYE Canada Operations Inc.)
    
    Ontario, CanadaMyers Tire Supply of
Canada (of MYE Canada Operations Inc.)
    
    Ontario, CanadaListo Products (of MYE
Canada Operations Inc.)
    
    Yukon TerritoryITML Horticultural
Products (of MYE Canada Operations Inc.)
    
    Ontario, Canada
EXHIBIT 23.01**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 Nos.33-72438, 333-06025, 333-88683, 333-115470 and 333-142850) pertaining to the Nashua CorporationEmployees’ Savings Plan, Nashua Corporation Amended 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, the NashuaCorporation 1999 Shareholder Value Plan, the Nashua Corporation 2004 Value Creation Incentive Planand the 2007 Value Creation Incentive Plan of our report dated February 26, 2008, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements of Nashua Corporation included in the annual report (Form10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP   Boston, Massachusetts  March 7, 2008
10759.

#### DIXON *v.*HYDE.

Decided March 18, 1920.

Rehearing denied April 7, 1920.

An accounting between partners being involved in this suit, the city court of Savannah was without jurisdiction of the suit.

Complaint; from city court of Savannah — Judge Freeman. June 6, 1919.

*Osborne, Lawrence & Abrahams,*for plaintiff in error,

cited: 111 *Ga.*654; 8 *Ga. App.*738 (5); 122 *Ga.*283; 124 *Ga.*103; 119 *Ga.*381, 384-5; 114 *Ga.*622; 20 R. C. L. 954.

*Hitch & Denmark,*contra,

cited: 30 Cyc. 464; 111 *Ga.*654; 114 *Ga.*662; 119 *Ga.*381.

Smith, J.

On June 4, 1917, James M. Dixon, *W.*C. Peeples, and E. A. Hyde entered into a general copartnership under a written agreement. The business to be conducted was that of wholesale and retail dealers in lumber. Dixon furnished the capital and he was to receive 7 per cent, interest on all capital furnished by him in cash, and then the net profits were to be divided, a half to Dixon, one fourth to Peeples, and one fourth to Hyde. The partnership was to commence on May 1, 1917, and continue only so long as it was agreeable to all parties, any one of them to have the right to terminate it upop 24 hours notice. In the event of dissolution Dixon was to have the option of buying the interest of Peeples and Hyde, either or both, at the book value. If he refused to do this, Peeples and Hyde, either or both, would have the same option of purchasing Dixon’s interest. If this value could not be agreed upon, the matter was to be referred to statutory arbitration. Peeples voluntarily withdrew from the partnership in September, 1917. Hyde and Dixon continued the business until February 11, 1918, without any agreement. On *85that date they executed an agreement adopting the original co-partnership agreement with the modification that Dixon was to receive 60% of the net profits and Iiyde 40% of the net profits. On February 14, 1919, Hyde withdrew, and he thereafter brought suit against Dixon, seeking to recover his share of the net profits between September, 1917, and February 11, 1918, and also the book value of Ms interest from the latter date to the time that he withdrew from the partnership. The petition set out the contract and all of the above facts fully, and alleged a certain amount as the book value of the interest of Hyde, and also a fixed amount as his share of the net profits for the period of time between the withdrawal of Peeples and the agreement between Dixon and Hyde. To this petition both general and special demurrers were filed, the general demurrer insisting that the city court of Savannah did not have jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the suit, because it involved an accounting between partners. Hpon a careful review of the petition as amended it is apparent that this contention is well taken, and the court erred in overruling the general demurrer. See *Paulk*v. Creech, 8 *Ga. App.*738 (5), 742 (70 S. E. 145), and cit. This ruling renders it unnecessary to pass upon the questions raised by the special demurrers.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
1

 In so doing, in addition to those reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation, the Court notes that a copy of the Report and Recommendation was mailed to the

Plaintiff at the address that he provided; however, it was returned to the Court as undeliverable which

indicates that the Plaintiff has failed to comply with the requirements of this Court by failing to notify the

Court of any change in address.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MARIO ANDJUAN PEEPLES, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00689-KD-N

 )

ACE AMERICA, )

 )

Defendant. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this file and there having been no

objections filed,1

 the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C.

§ 636 and dated January 6, 2010, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure

to prosecute and to obey the Court's order.

DONE and ORDERED this the 1st day of February 2010. 

/s / Kristi K DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00689-KD-N Document 9 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DAVID LAUSELL, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 812 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
AO 245D (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations (8488)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE

V. (For Revocation of Supervised Release)

JAMES LAVON TUNSTALL

CASE NUMBER: 1:05-CR-00267-006 

USM NUMBER: 09447-003

THE DEFENDANT: W. Gregory Hughes, Esquire 

Defendant's Attorney

(X) admitted guilt to violation of supervision conditions: Special Condition, 7,8,9 & Mandatory

Condition as set out in the petition dated 9/15/2009.

( ) was found in violation of supervision condition(s): 

Date violation

Violation Number Nature of Violation Occurred

Special Condition Technical

7 Technical

8 Technical

9 Technical

Mandatory Condition New Offense 8/6/09 (new arrest)

The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 2 of this judgment. The sentence is

imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.

( ) The defendant has not violated condition(s) and is discharged as to such violation(s)

condition.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States Attorney for this

district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution,

costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid.

Defendant's Social Security No.: 6566 

Defendant's Date of Birth: 1975 

Defendant's Residence Address:

Monroeville, AL 

 

Defendant's Mailing Address:

 

 

October 15, 2009

Date of Imposition of Judgment

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

October 16, 2009

Date

Case 1:05-cr-00267-KD-B Document 548 Filed 10/16/09 Page 1 of 2
Judgment 2

AO 245D (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations: Sheet 2 - Imprisonment

Defendant: JAMES LAVON TUNSTALL

Case Number: 1:05-CR-00267-006

IMPRISONMENT

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be

imprisoned for a total term of TWENTY-FOUR (24) MONTHS .

(X) The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons: that the defendant be

imprisoned at an institution where defendant can be evaluated for and receive substance abuse

treatment.

(X) The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

( ) The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district:

( ) at .m. on .

( ) as notified by the United States Marshal.

( ) The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of

Prisons:

( ) before 2 p.m. on .

( ) as notified by the United States Marshal.

( ) as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office.

RETURN

I have executed this judgment as follows:

Defendant delivered on to at 

with a certified copy of this judgment.

 UNITED STATES MARSHAL 

 By: 

 Deputy U.S. Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00267-KD-B Document 548 Filed 10/16/09 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contais summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for the three months ended February 28, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Nov-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     Dec-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       Feb-28-1997
<CASH>                             29,606
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      1,846,865
<ALLOWANCES>                       0 
<INVENTORY>                        1,410,341
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   0
<PP&E>                             24,188,554
<DEPRECIATION>                     4,322,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     34,447,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              0
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                           3,991
<OTHER-SE>                         5,950,349
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       34,447,860
<SALES>                            3,798,842
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   3,798,842
<CGS>                              2,986,696
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      2,986,696
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   167,999
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 357,693
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (221,814)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (221,814)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       (221,814)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (.11)

        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ZACHARY CHAPMAN, :

Petitioner, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 04-0767-WS-C

UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, :

Respondent. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is

ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute

and to obey the Court's order.

DONE and ORDERED this 19th day of April, 2006.

 s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-00767-WS-C Document 4 Filed 04/19/06 Page 1 of 2
 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ZACHARY CHAPMAN, :

Petitioner, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 04-0767-WS-C

UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS,:

Respondent. :

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED

without prejudice. 

DONE this day of , 20 .

 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-00767-WS-C Document 4 Filed 04/19/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.14



 Exhibit 10.14 
  
 October 26, 2005 
  
 Endeavor Acquisition Corp. 
 180 Madison Avenue, Suite 2305 
 New York, New York 10016 
  

	 	Re:	Endeavor Acquisition Corp. (“Company”) 

  
 Gentlemen: 
  
 Each of the undersigned hereby waives his/its right to exercise conversion rights with respect to any shares of the Company’s common stock owned by
the undersigned, directly or indirectly, and agrees that he/it will not seek conversion with respect to such shares in connection with any vote to approve a business combination (as is more fully described in the Company’s Prospectus relating
to the Company’s initial public offering). 
  

			
	 	 	Very truly yours,
		
	 	 	TOWER TRUST
		
	By:	 	/s/ Eric Watson
	 	 	Name: Eric Watson
	 	 	Title:   Chairman
		
	 	 	/s/ Jonathan J. Ledecky
	 	 	Jonathan J. Ledecky
		
	 	 	/s/ Jay H. Nussbaum
	 	 	Jay H. Nussbaum
		
	 	 	/s/ Kerry Kennedy
	 	 	Kerry Kennedy
		
	 	 	/s/ Robert B. Hersov
	 	 	Robert B. Hersov
		
	 	 	/s/ Edward J. Mathias
	 	 	Edward J. Mathias