DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WILLIAM TERRY ROBINSON a/k/a WILLIE TERRY ROBINSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1064

[September 14, 2022]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Deborah Carpenter-Toye, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

21-12232TC10A.

Gordon Weekes, Public Defender, and Lisa S. Lawlor, Chief Assistant 

Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

DAMOORGIAN, J.

Appellant, William Terry Robinson, was charged with Driving While 

License Suspended with Knowledge, pursuant to section 322.34(2)(a), 

Florida Statutes (2021). The case proceeded to trial where Appellant’s 

driving record with the Florida Department of Highway and Motor Safety 

(“DHSMV”) was admitted into evidence. The driving record reflected 

Appellant’s license status as “valid” with an “issue date” of October 10, 

2020. The address listed on Appellant’s driving record was a residential 

re-entry program where Appellant lived after his release from prison in 

2020. Prior to that, he was homeless. Regarding suspensions, the second 

page of the driving record listed one sanction which provided: failure to 

pay suspension effective April 17, 2012; a citation number; and that notice 

was provided on March 28, 2012. The driving record did not reflect the

address to which the notice of suspension was sent in 2012, and there was 

no testimony regarding Appellant’s address in 2012. Appellant twice

moved for a judgment of acquittal on grounds the State failed to present a 
2

prima facie case that he knew his license had been suspended. The court 

denied the motions. Appellant was adjudicated guilty as charged. 

On appeal, Appellant argues the court fundamentally erred when it 

denied his motions of judgment of acquittal because the State failed to 

prove Appellant had knowledge his license was suspended. The State 

properly concedes error.

To prove the crime of driving with a suspended license, the State must 

establish three elements: (1) the defendant’s driver’s license was 

suspended at the relevant time, (2) the defendant had knowledge of the 

license suspension, and (3) the defendant was actually driving. Prater v. 

State, 161 So. 3d 489, 491 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014). See also Fla. Std. Jury 

Instr. (Crim.) 28.11. “The element of knowledge is satisfied if the person 

has been previously cited . . . or the person admits to knowledge of the 

cancellation, suspension, or revocation, or suspension or revocation 

equivalent status; or the person received notice . . . .” § 322.34(2), Fla. 

Stat. (2021). Regarding notice, the State is required to prove that DHSMV 

mailed the notice to the last known mailing address. See Anderson v. 

State, 87 So. 3d 774, 780 (Fla. 2012).

Here, Appellant denied having knowledge of the 2012 suspension and 

denied receiving notice of the suspension. While the driving record 

admitted into evidence and relied on by the State reflected a notice of 

suspension was sent in 2012, the driving record did not provide where the 

suspension notice was sent at the time of mailing and there was no 

evidence of Appellant’s last known address on file with DHSMV in 2012. 

The only address listed on the driving record was an address from 2020. 

The State therefore failed to present a prima facie case that Appellant had 

knowledge of his license suspension. We accordingly reverse the 

conviction and sentence and remand with instructions for the trial court 

to enter a judgment of acquittal.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., and WARNER, J., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.