alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Mine Safety and Health Research Advisory Committee, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through November 30, 2016. 

For information, contact Jeffrey H. Welsh, B.A., Designated Federal Officer, Mine Safety and Health Research Advisory Committee, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Mailstop P05, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15236, Telephone (412) 386-4040 or fax (412) 386-6614. 

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                 

Claudette Grant, 

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2014-28933 Filed 12-9-14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
11501.

#### Taylor *v.*Holmes.

Decided July 13, 1920.

Certiorari; from Carroll superior court — Judge Terrell. March 17, 1920.

*Boykin & Boykin,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. K. Fielder,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

“ An affidavit of illegality is not the proper remedy to arrest an execution and set aside a judgment, upon the ground that at the time of its rendition by the court, as being by default, there was an issuable plea of file and undisposed of.” *Tumlin*v. *O’Bryan,*68 *Ga.*65 (1). See also *Greene*v. Oliphant, 64 *Ga.*566 (1) ; *Brown*v. *Webb,*121 *Ga.*281 (1) (48 S. E. 917). The court properly refused to sanction the certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
1Because the plaintiff’s successful bid is less than the amount of its claim, it is not required to

transfer any funds to the Marshal as a condition of confirmation. (Doc. 19, ¶ 7).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BUSINESS LOAN CENTER, L.L.C., )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-0792-WS-M

 )

F/V BEAU RIVAGE, in rem, )

 )

Defendant. )

ORDER

 This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff’s motion to confirm sale of the F/V BEAU

RIVAGE (“the Vessel”), to convey title to the Vessel, and to release the Vessel. (Doc. 22). The file

reflects the following: that notice of the sale was properly given pursuant to Court order; that the sale

took place as ordered on the front steps of the United States Courthouse in Mobile, Alabama at noon

on May 25, 2005; that the plaintiff’s bid of $75,000.00 was the highest and best bid received; that the

plaintiff has performed the terms of the purchase;1 and that no written objection to the sale or the sale

price has been filed.

Accordingly, pursuant to Supplemental Rule E and Local Admiralty Rule 9, the motion to

confirm sale, convey title and release the Vessel is granted. The sale of the Vessel to the plaintiff is

confirmed. The Marshal is directed to execute and deliver to the plaintiff, or to any person or entity

designated by the plaintiff in writing, a Marshal’s bill of sale conveying title to the Vessel, her engines,

machines, fittings, tackle and all other appurtenances thereto belonging, free and clear of any and all

liens and encumbrances, along with all other appropriate documentation to effect a proper legal

conveyance of the Vessel. The Vessel is hereby released from seizure and court-directed

custodianship by Gazzier Shipyard, Inc. to the plaintiff or to any person or entity designated by the

plaintiff. 

Case 1:04-cv-00792-WS-M Document 23 Filed 06/03/05 Page 1 of 2
DONE and ORDERED this 3rd day of June, 2005.

s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-00792-WS-M Document 23 Filed 06/03/05 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 4.24


 


Deed of settlement and release and deed of access,
indemnity and insurance (November 2004) – 

Mr Richard E McKinnon


 


The deed of settlement and release and deed of
indemnity (November 2004) of Mr Richard E McKinnon is incorporated by
reference to National Australia Bank Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Commission
on January 20, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1419 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1419

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to issue a new rule removing 
 the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem population of grizzly bears 
      from the Federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2023

Mr. Rosendale (for himself, Mr. Zinke, and Ms. Hageman) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to issue a new rule removing 
 the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem population of grizzly bears 
      from the Federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Comprehensive Grizzly Bear 
Management Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF NORTHERN CONTINENTAL DIVIDE ECOSYSTEM POPULATION OF 
              GRIZZLY BEARS FROM FEDERAL LIST OF ENDANGERED AND 
              THREATENED WILDLIFE.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall issue a final rule removing 
the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem population of grizzly bears 
from the Federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife without 
regard to any other provision of law that applies to the issuance of 
such rule. Such issuance and this section shall not be subject to 
judicial review.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MORGAN'S
FOODS, INC. FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 27, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-27-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-27-2000
<CASH>                                       4,612,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  112,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    583,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,317,000
<PP&E>                                      53,012,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,179,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              62,188,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,545,000
<BONDS>                                     50,713,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     900,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                62,188,000
<SALES>                                     65,660,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            65,660,000
<CGS>                                       36,933,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               61,921,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (121,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,573,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                287,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            283,000
<DISCONTINUED>                               (629,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (346,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)


</TABLE>
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 08-0633

IN RE  BEIRNE, MAYNARD & PARSONS, L.L.P.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relator’s emergency motion for stay, filed August 8, 2008, is granted.   The Amended Order to Conduct Audit dated April 29, 2008, in Cause No. 06-0343, styled *Beirne, Maynard & Parsons v. Riverstone Claims Management, LLC. and TIG Insurance Company, individually and as successor in interest to Transamerica Insurance Company and Transamerica Insurance Company of Texas*, in the 71st District Court of Harrison County, Texas, is stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The real party in interest is requested to respond to relator’s petition for writ of mandamus on or before 3:00 p.m., August 25, 2008.

3.The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.

Done at the City of Austin, this August 13, 2008.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Leamon Grant West, * From the 238th District Court

 of Midland County

Trial Court No. CR48034.

Vs. No. 11-17-00050-CR * February 7, 2019

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, S.C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgments below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgments of the trial court are in all things affirmed.
[Cite as State ex rel. Montanez v. Sutula, 2014-Ohio-3825.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA 

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION 

No. 101525

STATE OF OHIO EX REL., 

SAMMY MONTANEZ

RELATOR 

vs. 

JUDGE JOHN D. SUTULA

RESPONDENT 

JUDGMENT: 

WRIT DENIED 

Writ of Procedendo 

Order No. 477251 

Motion No. 476461 

RELEASE DATE: September 3, 2014 
FOR RELATOR

Sammy Montanez, pro se 

Mansfield Correctional Institution 

Inmate No. 492-270 

P.O. Box 788 

Mansfield, OH 44901 

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT

Timothy J. McGinty 

Cuyahoga County Prosecutor 

By: James E. Moss 

Assistant County Prosecutor 

9th Floor Justice Center 

1200 Ontario Street 

Cleveland, OH 44113 
MELODY J. STEWART, J.: 

{¶1} Sammy Montanez has filed a complaint for a writ of procedendo. Montanez 

seeks a writ that requires Judge John D. Sutula to render a ruling with regard to a motion 

to “issue revised journal entry of conviction” filed on March 10, 2014, that he alleges is 

necessary in order to create a final appealable order in compliance with Crim.R. 32(C) in 

State v. Montanez, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-04-454739-A. We decline to issue a writ of 

procedendo because respondent has performed the requested relief and the writ is now 

moot. 

{¶2} Attached to respondent’s motion for summary judgment is a copy of a 

judgment entry, journalized on July 3, 2014, which demonstrates that the court has 

ordered Montanez to be returned to the trial court’s jurisdiction for a resentencing 

hearing, and the order specifically references this original action as the impetus of the 

order. Accordingly, Montanez’s request for a writ of procedendo is moot. State ex rel. 

Fontanella v. Kontos, 117 Ohio St.3d 514, 2008-Ohio-1431, 885 N.E.2d 220; State ex 

rel. Reynolds v. Basinger, 99 Ohio St.3d 303, 2003-Ohio-3631, 791 N.E.2d 459. A writ 

of procedendo will not issue to compel the performance of a duty that has already been 

performed. State ex rel. Rose v. McGinty, 123 Ohio St.3d 86, 2009-Ohio-4050, 914 

N.E.2d 366; State ex rel. Sevayega v. McMonagle, 122 Ohio St.3d 54, 2009-Ohio-2367, 

907 N.E.2d 1180. 

{¶3} Judge Sutula’s motion for summary judgment is granted. Costs to 

respondent. Costs waived. The court directs the clerk of courts to serve all parties 
with notice of this judgment and the date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 

58(B). 

{¶4} Writ denied. 

__________________________________________ 

MELODY J. STEWART, JUDGE 

MARY J. BOYLE, A.J., and 

LARRY A. JONES, J., CONCUR
Exhibit 31.2
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AMDL, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a  15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
   Date: August 19, 2009
    /s/ Akio AriuraAkio AriuraChief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary (Principal Financial Officer)
AMDL, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                          16,389
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  176,280
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,214
<INVENTORY>                                    264,232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               465,563
<PP&E>                                         554,550
<DEPRECIATION>                                 318,924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 862,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          327,327
<BONDS>                                        314,091
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,402
<OTHER-SE>                                     158,272
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   862,443
<SALES>                                      4,123,213
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,123,213
<CGS>                                        3,698,752
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  362,407
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,388
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,453<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,216
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,237
<DISCONTINUED>                                   4,566<F4>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,803
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.74
<FN>
<F1>Includes net reversal of special charges of $7,045.
<F4>Disposal of discontinued operations net of income tax of $3,587.
</FN>


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

***URANIUM RESOURCES, INC.***

405State Highway 121 Bypass, Building A, Suite 110, Lewisville, TX 75067

972.219.3330Phone  972.219.3311 Fax

 

November 10, 2008

 

Securities and ExchangeCommission

450 5th Street,N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Thomas H. Ehrlich, VicePresident - Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Uranium Resources, Inc.(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)  TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30,2008 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| */s/* Thomas H. Ehrlich                     |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Thomas H. Ehrlich                           |   |
| Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |   |
| November 10, 2008                      |   |

 

----
10044.

#### Ash *et al.,*executors, *v.*Peoples Bank of Oliver.

Decided February 13, 1920.

Complaint; from city court of Springfield—Judge Shearouse. June 14, 1918. ■

*II. B. Strange, Travis & Travis,*for plaintiffs in error.

*A. B. Lovett,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

1. In answer to questions certified by this court in this case, the Supreme Court, on January 16, 1920, handed down an opinion with the following headnotes. See 149 *Ga.*713 (101 S. E. 912).

“1. Writs of error do not lie from the city court of Springfield to the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

“2. Nor has the judge of that court power or authority to hear and determine a motion for a new trial.

“3. Upon review of the cases of *Monford*v. *State,*114 *Ga.*528 (40 S. E. 798), and *Welborne*v. *State,*114 *Ga.*793 (40 S. E. 857), and other decisions to the same effect, the rulings there made are reaffirmed.” Under the above rulings the writ of error is

*Dismissed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit102-DirectorCompensationArrangementtobeattachedtoQ1201510-Qfiling




Exhibit 10.2


In connection with its review of director compensation in December 2014, the Board approved the same level of director compensation in the form of cash retainer, per diem amount, and targeted value of equity for 2015 as had been in effect for the majority of 2014, effective January 1, 2015, as described below (with a few noted exceptions):


		
	•
	The base annual retainer payable to all directors remains at $50,000.




		
	•
	The value of the equity award grant to all directors remains at $50,000.




		
	•
	Board members will receive a $1,200 fee per day for each committee meeting attended, if on a day other than that of a Board meeting.  The cash per diem policy was also clarified to provide that a Board member’s attendance at more than twelve days of in-person Board meetings per year by a Board member would result in payment to that member of a $1,200 per diem for each day other than the twelve days contemplated.




		
	•
	The incremental annual retainer payable to:




		
	◦
	the Chairman of the Board was increased from $20,000 to $32,000, bringing his total annual retainer to $82,000.




		
	◦
	the Chairman of the Audit Committee was increased from $10,000 to $12,000, bringing his total annual retainer to $62,000.




		
	◦
	the Chairman of the Compensation Committee remains at $6,500, and his total annual retainer remains at $56,500.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00154-CV

NO. 03-13-00155-CV

Carolyn Barnes, Appellant

v.

Velocity Credit Union, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. 12-1288-C277 & 12-0459-T277, HONORABLE KEN ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In trial court cause number 12-0459-T277, appellant Carolyn Barnes asserted claims

against defendants that included appellee Velocity Credit Union. Velocity subsequently obtained

a summary judgment against Barnes, and the district court, on Velocity’s motion, severed Barnes’s

claims against Velocityinto a separate cause number, 12-1288-C277, making the summaryjudgment

final. Barnes filed a notice of appeal referencing both cause numbers, which were docketed as

separate appeals—03-13-00154-CV for the appeal from trial court cause number 12-1288-C277, and

03-13-00155-CV for the appeal from trial court cause number 12-0459-T277.

Indicating that trial court cause number 12-1288-C277 is the intended subject of

her appeal, Barnes has moved that we consolidate the two appellate causes into 03-13-00154-CV

(the appeal from 12-1288-C277) and dismiss appellate cause 03-13-00155-CV. Velocity agrees

that only trial court cause number 12-1288-C277 is the subject of Barnes’s appeal and does not
object to consolidation. We therefore grant Barnes’s motion and consolidate appellate cause number

03-13-00155-CV into cause number 03-13-00154-CV. The record and all filings from cause number

03-13-00155-CV are transferred into cause number 03-13-00154-CV, and cause number 03-13-

00155-CV is dismissed.

_____________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

03-13-00154-CV Consolidated

03-13-00155-CV Dismissed

Filed: May 17, 2013

2
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: In re Rescue Concepts, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 16

- 00564

- CV

Trial court case number: 2014

- 71749

Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: November 3, 2017

Party filing motion: Jones Lang LaSalle

– Texas, Inc., Real Party in Interest

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes_

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes and Bland

Date: February 6, 2018