alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4829 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4829

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 103 East Kleberg in Kingsville, Texas, as the ``Irma Rangel Post 
                           Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4829

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 103 East Kleberg in Kingsville, Texas, as the ``Irma Rangel Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 103 
East Kleberg in Kingsville, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 
``Irma Rangel Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Irma Rangel Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 6, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Moore Products Co. of our report dated January 31, 1997, included in the 1996
Annual Report to Shareholders of Moore Products Co.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-82948) pertaining to the Incentive Stock Option and Non-Qualified
Stock Option Plan of Moore Products Co. of our report dated January 31, 1997,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Moore Products Co.
incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1996.

                                                     /s/Ernst & Young LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 27, 1997
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOHN STEVENSON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3205

)

KAREN L. STEVENSON, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed May 17, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Chet A. Tharpe, 

Judge.

Mark F. Baseman of Felix, Felix & 

Baseman, Tampa, for Appellant.

Kristin A. Norse and Stuart C. Markman of

Kynes, Markman & Felman, P.A., Tampa,

for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133918 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133918 COA: 272814 Oakland CC: 1991-108672-FC FELIPE PLANES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 18, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
Order entered October 16, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01250-CV

IN RE JOE TRAMPAS BENAVIDES, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-9921709-MW

ORDER

Before Justices Bridges, Lang-Miers and Stoddart

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
EX-10.3



 






EXHIBIT 10.3




[The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company Letterhead]




Denise Stump

Executive Vice President, Human Resources Global



October 25, 2005




Mr. Patrick Norton

[Address]




Re: Extension of Letter Agreement through 1/31/06




Dear Patrick:



As you are aware, the Compensation & Organization Committee of the Board of Directors approved, at
the October 12, 2005 Committee meeting, an extension of your Letter Agreement. The Letter
Agreement now concludes effective 1/31/06. This extension will allow for the vesting of your
10,000 stock options granted on 1/28/05.



Please let me know if you would like to discuss this further, or if you have any additional
questions.




Sincerely,




/s/ Denise




Denise Stump
11118.

#### Independent Order of Puritans *v.*Cadden.

Decided March 3, 1920.

Action on insurance policy; from Fulton superior court — Judge Pendleton. September 29, 1919.

*Douglas*& *Douglas,*for plaintiff in error.

*Little, Powell, Smith & Goldstein,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

1. Where a party relies on the law of another State as furnishing the basis for a right of recovery or defense different from what it would be under the laws of this State, or the common law, the law of the foreign State should be pleaded and proved. *Southern Express Co.*v. *Hanaw,*134 *Ga.*445 (7), 458 (67 S. E. 944„ 137 Am. St. R. 227).

2. While the general rule is that where a policy is issued by a mutual' insurance or benefit insurance society, the insured becomes a member of the society, and must take notice of and be bound by its by-laws although they are not recited in the policy or expressly made a part thereof, yet where the terms of the policy are in conflict with a by-law of the Society, it having power under its charter to issue such a policy, the society must be deemed to have waived the provisions of the by-law in favor of the insured, and the policy will control the rights of the parties. Gienty *v.*Knights of Columbus, 199 N. Y. 103 (92 N. E. 111, 20 Ann. Cas. 928) ; McCoy *v.*Northwestern Mutual Relief Association, 92 Wis. 577 (66 N. W. 697, 47 L. R. A. 681); Davidson *v.*Old People’s Mutual Benefit Society, 39 Minn. 303 (39 N. W. 803) ; Morrison *v.*Wisconsin Odd Fellows Mutual Life Ins. Co., 59 Wis. 162 (18 N. W. 13); Union Mutual Fire Ins. Co. *v.*Keyser, 32 N. H. 313 (64 Am. D. 375); Fitzgerald *v.*Equitable Reserve Fund Life Association, 3 N. Y. Supp. 214; Failey *v.*Fee, 83 Md. 83 (34 Atl. 839, 32 L. R. A. 311, 55 Am. St. R. 326); Hale *v.*Equitable Aid Union, 168 Penn. 377 (31 Atl. 1066).

*(a)*In passing upon such a conflict the courts, in determining the rights of the parties, will adopt the provision that will give the greater right to the insured and his beneficiary. Supreme Tent etc. *v.*Volkert, 25 Ind. App. 627 (57 N. E. 203).

3. Under the above rulings and the facts of the instant case, the judge, sitting without a jury, properly resolved the conflict between the certificate of membership issued by the society and its by-laws in favor of the former, and did not err in rendering- jridgment for the plaintiff for the full amount of the policy and interest thereon.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
IB 

Union Calendar No. 472 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4775 

[Report No. 108–760] 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 

Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 

El Paso, Texas, water reclamation, reuse, and desalinization project, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 7, 2004 

Mr. REYES (for himself, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. HINOJOSA, and Mrs. NAPOLITANO) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

OCTOBER 7, 2004 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in the El Paso, Texas, water 

reclamation, reuse, and desalinization project, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4775 RH 

1 SECTION 1. EL PASO, TEXAS, WATER RECLAMATION, 

2 REUSE, AND DESALINIZATION PROJECT. 

3 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Reclamation Wastewater 

4 and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 

5 102–575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended 

6 by adding at the end the following new section: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 16ll. EL PASO, TEXAS, WATER RECLAMATION, 

8 REUSE, AND DESALINIZATION PROJECT. 

9 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera10 tion with the State and local authorities, is authorized to 

11 participate in the design, planning, and construction of the 

12 El Paso Water Reclamation, Reuse, and Desalinization 

13 project to reclaim and reuse wastewater and to treat and 

14 reuse impaired and brackish groundwater in the service 

15 area of the El Paso Water Utilities Public Service Board, 

16 El Paso, Texas. 

17 ‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost 

18 of the project authorized by this section shall not exceed 

19 50 percent of the total cost of the project. 

20 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide 

21 funds for the operation and maintenance of the project 

22 authorized by this section.’’. 

23 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

24 in section 2 of such Act is amended by inserting after the 

25 item relating to section 16ll the following: 
3 

•HR 4775 RH 

‘‘Sec. 16ll. El Paso, Texas, water reclamation, reuse, and desalinization 

project.’’. 
Union Calendar No. 472 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4775 

[Report No. 108–760] 

A BILL 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and 

poses. and desalinization project, and for other purthe El Paso, Texas, water reclamation, reuse, ize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in Groundwater Study and Facilities Act to authorOCTOBER 7, 2004 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
3 

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

DEAN HAROLD CURRY, ) 

 ) 

Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00404-WS-N 

 ) 

STATE OF ALABAMA,et al., ) 

 ) 

Defendants. ) 

 JUDGMENT 

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be and is hereby 

DISMISSED without prejudice. 

DONE this 24th day of August, 2010. 

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Case 1:09-cv-00404-WS-N Document 19 Filed 08/24/10 Page 1 of 1
#### Matter of the Estate of Charles H. Tweed, Deceased.

(Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

June, 1919.)

Taxes — when executors should pay out of decedent's' estate the personal property tax assessed against him— Greater New York Charter, § 892.

Where a testator died a resident of the city of New York on the *11th*day of October, 1917, his executors should pay out of his estate the personal property tax assessed against him by the city of New York for the year 1918, inasmuch as the Greater New York Charter provides that the taxable status of all persons and property shall be fixed for each year on the first day of October in the preceding year.

Proceeding upon the judicial settlement of executors.

Lee & Wadsworth, for executors.'

Miller, King, Lane *&*Trafford, for trustee.

William P. Burr, corporation counsel, for City of New York.

Leslie J. Tompkins, special guardian.

Fowler, S.

Upon the accounting of the executors a question arises as to whether they should pay the tax levied upon the personal property of the testator by the city of New York for the year 1918. The testator died on the 11th of October, 1917. Section 892 of the Greater New York Charter provides that the taxable status of all persons and property assessable for taxation in the city of New York shall be fixed for each year on the first day of October in the preceding year. As the testator resided in the city of New York and *601was living on the 1st of October, 1917, he was liable to taxation on his personal property, and therefore the assessors properly inserted his name and the assessed value of his personal property in the annual record of the assessed valuation of personal property in the city of New York for the year 1918. The tax which was subsequently levied upon this assessment and which became due on the 1st of May, 1918, is properly payable out of the personal estate of the testator which came into the hands of his executors. *Matter of Bab*cock, 115 N. Y. 450. Any other interpretation. of the statute would mean that the city of New York could not collect taxes on the personal property of any person dying after the first of October and before the first of the following May. Such an impractical construction of the statute should be avoided.

In *Matter of Freund,*143 App. Div. 335, cited by the executors, lands of the testator had been assessed for the purpose of taxation prior to his death, but the taxes had not been levied at the date of his death, and the court held that such taxes were not deductible as an indebtedness from his personal estate. This decision had reference to taxes on real estate, which are a lien on the land after they become due and payable, and are therefore to be paid by the heirs or devisees and not by the personal representatives of the deceased.

The decree should provide for the payment by the executors of the taxes levied by the city of New York on the personal property of the testator for the year 1918.

Decreed accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>    1
       
<S>                                           <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<CASH>                                            584,035
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     262,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  869,354
<PP&E>                                          9,552,336
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,811,930
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  8,963,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             535,014
<BONDS>                                         4,537,345
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                      2,389,985
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    8,963,317
<SALES>                                           467,413
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  471,700
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     226,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  117,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 95,550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (5,922)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (5,922)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (5,922)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        

</TABLE>
11318.

#### Walker *v.*The State.

Decided April 13, 1920.

Indictment for larceny of hog; from Tift superior court — Judge Eve. January 10, 1920.

*R. D. Smith,*for plaintiff in error.

*R. S. Foy, solicitor-general,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are merely elaborations of the usual general grounds. There was some evidence which authorized the verdict; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 32.2
**Written Statement of the ChiefFinancial Officer****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350**
     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, theundersigned Chief Financial Officer of Whitehall Limited, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBof the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
*/s/ Kay Carter*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7673

GEORGE HENSON, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-01-59)

Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 5, 2003

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Henson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

George Henson, Jr., appeals the magistrate judge’s order

granting his motion to supplement the record in his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2000) petition but denying further relief. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we

grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the magistrate judge. See Henson v. Angelone, No. CA-01-

59 (E.D. Va. Oct. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1402 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to provide coverage for boxing-based exercise classes for veterans 

diagnosed with certain movement disorders, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2023 

Mr. HIGGINS of New York (for himself and Mr. LAHOOD) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide coverage for boxingbased exercise classes for veterans diagnosed with certain 

movement disorders, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Boxing Therapy for 

5 Parkinson’s Access Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1402 IH

1 SEC. 2. BOXING-BASED EXERCISE CLASSES FOR TREAT2 MENT OF VETERANS DIAGNOSED WITH CER3 TAIN MOVEMENT DISORDERS. 

4 (a) COVERAGE.—Subchapter II of chapter 17 of title 

5 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new section (and conforming the table of sec7 tions at the beginning of such chapter accordingly): 

8 ‘‘§ 1720K. Boxing-based exercise classes for treatment 

9 of certain movement disorders 

10 ‘‘(a) CLASSES.—In furnishing medical services under 

11 this chapter, the Secretary shall furnish boxing-based ex12 ercise classes to a veteran (through the provision of such 

13 classes to the veteran at a medical facility of the Depart14 ment or the reimbursement for such classes provided to 

15 the veteran at a non-Department facility) if the veteran— 

16 ‘‘(1) is enrolled in the health care system estab17 lished under section 1705(a) of this title; 

18 ‘‘(2) has been diagnosed with a covered move19 ment disorder; and 

20 ‘‘(3) elects to participate in such classes for the 

21 purpose of treating the covered movement disorder 

22 with which the veteran has been diagnosed. 

23 ‘‘(b) COVERED MOVEMENT DISORDER DEFINED.— 

24 In this section, the term ‘covered movement disorder’ 

25 means Parkinson’s disease or a similar movement dis26 order.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1402 IH

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by sub2 section (a) shall apply with respect to medical services fur3 nished on or after the date that is 180 days after the date 

4 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                             |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                      |   |                             |   |
| Date: August 2, 2010 |   | /s/ Samuel E. Beall, III    |   |
|                      |   | Samuel E. Beall, III             |   |
|                      |   | Chairman of the Board, President |   |
|                      |   | and Chief Executive Officer      |   |
|                      |   |                             |   |

----