alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3


 



REVOLVING LOAN NOTE







	
$3,500,000.00

	
May 12, 2015


	 	
New York, New York










FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, RICEBRAN TECHNOLOGIES, a California corporation (“Borrower”), HEREBY UNCONDITIONALLY PROMISES TO PAY to FULL CIRCLE CAPITAL CORPORATION, as agent on behalf of the Lenders (as defined in the Agreement referred to herein), and its successors and assigns (“Agent”), for its account, on behalf of Lenders (as defined in the Agreement referred to herein), on the Maturity Date (as defined in the Agreement referred to herein), THREE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($3,500,000), as set forth in the Agreement.







Borrower promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount hereunder from the date hereof until such principal amount is paid in full, at the interest rates as provided in the Agreement.







Both principal and interest are payable, at such times as are specified in the Agreement, in lawful money of the United States of America and in immediately available funds at Agent’s office at 102 Greenwich Avenue, 2nd Floor, Greenwich, Connecticut 06830, or at such other place as Agent may from time to time designate in writing.







This Revolving Loan Note is the evidence of the Revolving Loan referred to in, and is subject to and is entitled to the benefits of, that certain Loan, Guaranty and Security Agreement, dated as of May 12, 2015 (as same may be amended, restated, amended and restated, supplemented, renewed, extended, replaced, or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Agreement”), by and among Borrower, Agent and Lenders.  The Agreement, among other things, contains provisions for acceleration of the maturity hereof upon the happening of certain stated events and also for prepayments on account of principal hereof prior to the maturity hereof upon the terms and conditions therein specified.







The Revolving Loan made by Agent, for the benefit of Lenders, to Borrower pursuant to the Agreement may, but is not required to be, endorsed by Agent on the schedule attached hereto, or on a continuation of such schedule attached to and made a part hereof.







This Revolving Loan Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the substantive laws (other than conflict of law provisions and principles) of the State of New York.







All capitalized terms herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Agreement, except as otherwise specifically defined herein.


 


[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank


Signature Page Follows.]


 








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Borrower has executed this Revolving Loan Note as of the date set forth above.







	 	
RICEBRAN TECHNOLOGIES,

	
	 	
a California corporation

	
	 	 	 	
	 	
By:

	
/s/ J. Dale Belt

	
	 	 	
J. Dale Belt, CFO and Executive Vice President
#### Jacob Hawthorne & Wife *v.*The Highland Turnpike Company.

T r espass — Pleading.

A petition for .trespass to plaintiffs’ land, alleging that plaintiffs have sued to recover $1,500 damages’ for wrongful entry upon the land, and that they believe they will recover said sum, was held insufficient.

APPEAL PROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT.

March 5, 1874.

*554*Hallam, for appellcm-ts.'*

*Swmnons &*Bry¡cm, *for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

If, as a matter of law, the husband has the right to set off against the claim of an insolvent creditor that has been reduced to judgment, a claim in favor of his wife, and to. restrain his creditor from enforcing his judgment until the wife’s claim, can be litigated, proper grounds for the interposition of the chancellor being made out, still we are of opinion that the judgment in the case is correct. The averment in appellant’s petition is that they have instituted an action against the appellee to recover damages for a trespass to the wife’s realty. The exact language is that they have “instituted a suit against the said defendant in said court to recover damages against the defendant for the wrongful entry upon the lands of the said plaintiff, Mary L. Hawthorne, and by their hands and persons in their employ, and digging up the land' of the plaintiff, which action is still pending and undetermined, and that the plaintiff’s claim in said action is for $1,500, and they verily believe they will recover said sum,” etc. It is to be observed that it is not alleged that a trespass has been committed. The allegation, in effect, is that they have sued to recover damages for a wrongful entry upon Mrs. Hawthorne’s land. It is not enough to aver the pendency of a suit and the expectation of a recovery. They should allege facts showing that they have a cause of action, and therefore that they have the right to a recovery. This they have failed to do. The chancellor, therefore, properly declined to infer from, what is averred the existence of facts not directly and specifically set up by the parties asking relief. The demurrer was properly sustained.

Judgment affirmed.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1449 

AN ACT 

To amend the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to increase 

the frequency of lease sales, to require replacement sales, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1449 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Committing Leases 

3 for Energy Access Now Act’’ or the ‘‘CLEAN Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. GEOTHERMAL LEASING. 

5 (a) ANNUAL LEASING.—Section 4(b) of the Geo6 thermal Steam Act of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 1003(b)) is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘2 years’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘year’’; 

10 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as 

11 paragraphs (5) and (6), respectively; and 

12 (3) after paragraph (2), by inserting the fol13 lowing: 

14 ‘‘(3) REPLACEMENT SALES.—If a lease sale 

15 under paragraph (1) for a year is canceled or de16 layed, the Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a 

17 replacement sale during the same year. 

18 ‘‘(4) REQUIREMENT.—In conducting a lease 

19 sale under paragraph (2) in a State described in 

20 that paragraph, the Secretary of the Interior shall 

21 offer all nominated parcels eligible for geothermal 

22 development and utilization under the resource man23 agement plan in effect for the State.’’. 

24 (b) DEADLINES FOR CONSIDERATION OF GEO25 THERMAL DRILLING PERMITS.—Section 4 of the Geo-
3 

•HR 1449 EH

1 thermal Steam Act of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 1003) is amended 

2 by adding at the end the following: 

3 ‘‘(h) DEADLINES FOR CONSIDERATION OF GEO4 THERMAL DRILLING PERMITS.— 

5 ‘‘(1) NOTICE.—Not later than 30 days after the 

6 date on which the Secretary receives an application 

7 for any geothermal drilling permit, the Secretary 

8 shall— 

9 ‘‘(A) provide written notice to the appli10 cant that the application is complete; or 

11 ‘‘(B) notify the applicant that information 

12 is missing and specify any information that is 

13 required to be submitted for the application to 

14 be complete. 

15 ‘‘(2) ISSUANCE OF DECISION.—If the Secretary 

16 determines that an application for a geothermal 

17 drilling permit is complete under paragraph (1)(A), 

18 the Secretary shall issue a final decision on the ap19 plication not later than 30 days after the Secretary 
4 

•HR 1449 EH

1 notifies the applicant that the application is com2 plete.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 19, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1449 

AN ACT 

To amend the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to inplacement sales, and for other purposes. crease the frequency of lease sales, to require re-
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |   |                             |
|--------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                           |   |                             |   |
| Date: August 1, 2011 |   | /s/ Samuel E. Beall, III    |   |
|                           |   | Samuel E. Beall, III             |   |
|                           |   | Chairman of the Board, President |   |
|                           |   | and Chief Executive Officer      |   |
|                           |   |                             |   |
Exhibit 32


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I, Thomas Glover, Chief Executive Officer of Vasomedical,  Inc. (the "Company"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months
          ended  August  31,  2004  (the  "Report")   fully  complies  with  the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: January 13, 2005

                                         /s/ Thomas Glover
                                         ----------------------
                                         Thomas Glover
                                         Chief Executive Officer




I, Thomas W. Fry, Chief Financial Officer of Vasomedical,  Inc. (the "Company"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months
          ended  August  31,  2004  (the  "Report")   fully  complies  with  the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: January 13, 2005

                                         /s/ Thomas W. Fry
                                         ----------------------
                                         Thomas W. Fry
                                         Chief Financial Officer
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**369 CA 16-01489**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

JOHN PESTILLO, CLAIMANT-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
COUNTY OF MONROE, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, ET AL., RESPONDENT.

MICHAEL E. DAVIS, COUNTY ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (MATTHEW D. BROWN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
WILLIAM MATTAR, P.C., WILLIAMSVILLE (JOHN ABEEL OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Ann Marie Taddeo, J.), entered December 8, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the application of claimant for leave to serve a late notice of claim on respondent County of Monroe.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on January 13, 2017,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: March 24, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
United States Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

South Carolina

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, and has demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope

Mass Echelon II

20 kg to 1 mg

1000 lb 

500 lb

50 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Mass Echelon III

2000 kg to 1 mg

2500 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.0.03125 oz

Weight Carts 

6000 lb to 3000 lb

Wheel Load Weighers

≤ 40 000 lb 

Volume Gravimetric, I

5 gal 

Volume Transfer, II

20 L to 5 L

1500 gal to 1 gal

Volume Transfer, II LPG

100 gal to 25 gal

(Rev.: September 2021)

2023

____________________________________

Katrice Lippa, Chief

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

Effective Dates: 2023-02-01 to 2024-02-01
1

 Robinson also provided the Court with a letter explaining his request. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CRIMINAL NO. 09-00126-KD

)

PATRICK LEON ROBINSON, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This action is before the Court on the motion to correct filed by defendant Patrick Leon

Robinson and the response filed by the United States (docs. 143, 145).1

 A hearing was held on

April 2, 2010. Defendant Robinson, his counsel F. Luke Coley, and Assistant United States

Attorney Sean Costello, counsel for the United States, appeared at the hearing. 

Robinson moves the Court pursuant to Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to

correct his sentence. Robinson asserts that the Court orally pronounced at sentencing that

Robinson’s federal sentence would run concurrent with his yet to be imposed state sentence for

offenses pending in the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama. Robinson also asserts that

the Court orally pronounced its intention to allow Robinson credit for time spent in federal

custody prior to sentencing. Robinson argues that the judgment and commitment as written, do

not reflect this oral pronouncement, and hence his sentence will run consecutive to the state court

sentences and without credit for time in federal custody prior to sentencing. 

The United States responds that the Court stated that the sentence was to be served

concurrently only with any sentence imposed on state charges for the same conduct and did not

Case 1:09-cr-00126-KD-C Document 148 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 2
state that the sentence was to be served concurrently with any sentence imposed on state charges

for other conduct. 

Upon consideration of the transcript, pleadings and oral argument, and for reasons more

specifically set forth on the record, the motion to correct is DENIED. The Court did pronounce

that Robinson’s federal sentence was to run concurrent with any yet to be imposed state sentence

for the same conduct. However, on September 4, 2009, the state court grand jury returned a “no

bill” for the same conduct offenses. Therefore, when Robinson was sentenced on December 11,

2009, there is no dispute of fact that no same conduct cases were pending in the state court, and

hence, regardless of the oral pronouncement or written judgment, there were no cases with which

Robinson’s federal sentence could run concurrent. A modification to the judgment and

commitment would be form without substance. Also, calculation of credit for time served in

local custody is within the authority of the Bureau or Prisons. See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b). 

DONE and ORDERED this April 6, 2010.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cr-00126-KD-C Document 148 Filed 04/06/10 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Genesis has the following consolidated subsidiaries, each of which is
wholly-owned.

                     Name                              Jurisdiction
                     ----                              ------------

GenCoat Inc.                                           Delaware

GenInternational Inc.                                  Delaware

GenSystems Inc.                                        Delaware

GenSystems Services Inc.                               Delaware

GFG Corporation                                        Wisconsin

H-V Asset Management Corp.                             Delaware

H-V Equipment Company                                  Pennsylvania

H-V Mill Roll Services Inc.                            Pennsylvania

H-V Roll Center Inc.                                   Pennsylvania

H-V Technical Servcies Inc.                            Delaware

Herr-Voss Corporation                                  Pennsylvania

Herr-Voss Industries Inc. (a)                          Pennsylvania

Monarch Ohio, Inc.                                     Ohio

Precision Industrial Corporation                       Delaware

Stamco Depiereux GmbH (a)                              Germany

Monarch Busch GmbH (a)                                 Germany

Stamco (U.K.), Ltd.                                    United Kingdom

Monarch Machine Tool International, Inc. (FSC)         Barbados, West Indies

GFG International Corporation (FSC) (a)                Virgin Islands

GFG Peabody Ltd.                                       United Kingdom

H-V Foreign Sales Corporation (a)                      Virgin Islands

Herr-Voss Limited                                      United Kingdom

                                       54
<PAGE>   2


Mazuinas Operatrizes Monarch LTDA                      Brazil

Salem Engineering Company Limited                      United Kingdom

Salem Engineering Limited                              United Kingdom


(a)  Entities are in liquidation.
















                                       55
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------
     To the Shareowners of Monsanto Company:

     We have audited the accompanying statement of consolidated financial
position of Monsanto Company and subsidiaries as of Aug. 13, 2002, and the
related statements of consolidated operations, cash flows, shareowners' equity
and comprehensive loss for the period from Jan. 1, 2002 to Aug. 13, 2002 (not
presented separately herein). These financial statements are the responsibility
of the company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based upon our audits.

     We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

     In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Monsanto Company and
subsidiaries as of Aug. 13, 2002, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for the period from Jan. 1, 2002 to Aug. 13, 2002, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


St. Louis, Missouri
November 1, 2002
(November 15, 2002 as to Note 24)
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4827

AN ACT

To amend the Colorado Canyons National ConCanyons National Conservation Area. yons National Conservation Area as the McInnis ness Act of 2000 to rename the Colorado Can- servation Area and Black Ridge Canyons Wilder-

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4827

AN ACT

To amend the Colorado Canyons National Conservation Area

and Black Ridge Canyons Wilderness Act of 2000 to

rename the Colorado Canyons National Conservation

Area as the McInnis Canyons National Conservation

Area.
2

•HR 4827 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MCINNIS CANYONS NATIONAL CONSERVATION

4 AREA.

5 (a) PURPOSE.—The Colorado Canyons National Con6 servation Area and Black Ridge Canyons Wilderness Act

7 of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 460mmm et seq.) is amended in sec8 tion 2(b) by striking ‘‘Colorado Canyons’’ and inserting

9 ‘‘McInnis Canyons’’.

10 (b) DEFINITIONS.—Section 3 of such Act is

11 amended—

12 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Colorado’’

13 and inserting ‘‘McInnis’’; and

14 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘Colorado’’

15 and inserting ‘‘McInnis’’.

16 (c) COLORADO CANYONS NATIONAL CONSERVATION

17 AREA.—Section 4 of such Act is amended—

18 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘COLORADO’’

19 and inserting ‘‘MCINNIS’’; and

20 (2) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Colorado

21 Canyons’’ and inserting ‘‘McInnis Canyons’’.

22 (d) ADVISORY COUNCIL.—Section 8(a) of such Act

23 is amended by striking ‘‘Colorado Canyons’’ and inserting

24 ‘‘McInnis Canyons’’.
3

•HR 4827 EH

1 (e) SHORT TITLE.—Section 1 of such Act is amended

2 by striking ‘‘Colorado’’ and inserting ‘‘McInnis’’.

3 (f) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

5 States to the ‘‘Colorado Canyons National Conservation

6 Area’’ shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘McInnis

7 Canyons National Conservation Area’’.

8 (g) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section and the amend9 ments made by this section take effect on January 1,

10 2005.

Passed the House of Representatives September 28,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7673
GEORGE HENSON, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-01-59) Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 5, 2003 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Henson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: George Henson, Jr., appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting his motion to supplement the record in his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition but denying further relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Henson v. Angelone , No. CA-01- 59 (E.D. Va. Oct. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED