alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         207,521
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 207,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (157,431)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   207,521
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,264
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     98
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 98
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        98
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>REGISTRANT HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                     570,879
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               64,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           1,214,088
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             1,214,088
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            13,510
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              160,433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          (240,795)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             93,872
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                93,872
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 3.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 3.49


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Historic Preservation Properties 1989
LP ("HPP'89") on Form 10-QSB for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HPP'89.

/s/ Robert Gunn
---------------------
Robert Gunn
Asset Manager
(Performing similar functions of Financial Officer)

Date: August 12, 2004
11465.

#### TOWNSEND *v.*WILSON.

Decided November 11, 1920.

Appeal; from Johnson, superior court—Judge Kent, March 16, 1920.

Stephens, J.

Where, on the hearing in the court of ordinary of an application-for the appointment of a guardian, the applicant consented to the appointment of another, who was then appointed by the court of ordinary, but who afterwards refused to qualify, and the ordinary by order at a subsequent term appointed a third party, the applicant could enter an appeal from the latter order to the superior court; and it was error to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the applicant had consented to the first order appointing as guardian the person who failed to qualify.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., concurs. Smith, J., dissents.*

*814
      *Alfred Herrington Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. L. Hatcher,*contra.

Smith, J.,

dissenting. Otis Townsend applied to the ordinary of Johnson county, asking that he be appointed guardian of the person and property of the two minor children of J. A. Townsend, deceased. Citation issued regularly, and at the June term, 1919, of the court of ordinary, an order was passed, reciting that by consent of all parties, and no valid objection having been filed, Wilkins Townsend, the grandfather of said minors, was ajDpointed guardian of the person and property of said minors, upon his taking the oath of office and giving the bond required by law. Wilkins Townsend failed to qualify within the time required by law, and on July 7, 1919, at the regular July term of the court, an order was passed, reciting the former order appointing Wilkins Townsend as guardian, and that it appeared that said Wilkins Townsend had failed to qualify as such guardian within the time required by law, and further reciting that Wilkins Townsend appeared at this term and in open court renounced his said appointment and refused to qualify, whereupon Bartow Wilson, the other grandfather of the minor children, was appointed as guardian. From this last order Otis Townsend entered his appeal to the superior court, and upon the case being called for trial his appeal was dismissed.

When Otis Townsend, at the term to which his application for guardianship was returnable, appeared in open court and consented to the appointment of another person as such guardian, and such other person was then and there appointed, and when at a later term the person so appointed appeared and renounced his appointment and refused to qualify, and the ordinary thereupon in open court appointed another person as such guardian, Otis Townsend waived his right to the appointment, and, there being no caveat or objection filed by him or anyone else, the judge of the superior court did not err in dismissing the appeal.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

v. ) Criminal Action No. 08-00137-KD-M

)

MONROE WHITFIELD, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This action is before the Court on the defendant’s motion for reduction of sentence 

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). (Doc. 45)

1

Effective November 1, 2014, the United States Sentencing Commission enacted 

Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. In general, Amendment 782 

reduces the base offense levels assigned to particular controlled substance quantities in the Drug 

Quantity Table, U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c), and thus operates to reduce the applicable guideline ranges.

The Commission has deemed Amendment 782 to apply retroactively. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(d).

Defendant moves the Court to apply the modified Sentencing Guidelines scheme 

effectuated by Amendment 782. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), the Court is empowered to 

reduce the Defendant’s sentence under these circumstances. See generally United States v. 

Armstrong, 347 F.3d 905, 909 (11th Cir. 2003) (“[A]mendments claimed in § 3582(c)(2) 

motions may be retroactively applied solely where expressly listed under § 1B1.10(c).”)2

(emphasis in original). 

 1 Defendant’s request for a court-appointed attorney is denied. Defendant does not have a 

statutory or constitutional right to appointed counsel to assist with the motion for reduction. See

United States v. Webb, 565 F.3d 789, 794-95 (11th Cir. 2009); United States v. Blaine, 409 

Fed.Appx. 253, 260 n.4 (11th Cir. 2010). 2 Section 1B1.10(c) has been renumbered as § 1B1.10(d) by Amendment 782.

Case 1:08-cr-00137-KD-M Document 48 Filed 12/31/14 Page 1 of 2
After review of the motion and all relevant factors prescribed by § 1B1.10 and 

Application Note 1(B), the Court has determined that a sentence reduction based on the amended 

guideline range may be appropriate in this case. Defendant’s original guideline range was 140 to 

175 months. However, the United States’ motion for departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 

was granted and the Court imposed a sentence of 90 months. (Doc. 33, 34, 36) 

According to the revised guideline calculation prepared by the United States Probation 

Office, Defendant’s revised guideline range is 120 to 150 months after retroactive application of 

Amendment 782. Imposing a similar sentence, departing from the low-end of the guideline 

range by 36%, would result in a sentence of 77 months. 

Accordingly, unless either party files a written objection on or before January 30, 2015,

the Court will enter an order reducing the Defendant’s term of imprisonment to 77 months,

effective November 1, 2015. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(e).3

DONE and ORDERED this the 30th day of December 2014. 

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 3

 “(e) Special Instruction.-- (1) The court shall not order a reduced term of imprisonment based 

on Amendment 782 unless the effective date of the court's order is November 1, 2015, or later.” 

Case 1:08-cr-00137-KD-M Document 48 Filed 12/31/14 Page 2 of 2
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  514,940
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     59,139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               557,212
<PP&E>                                       1,951,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                 185,737
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             138,866,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,831,025
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       210,401
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  57,751,509
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               138,866,246
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               643,648
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  576,329
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             227,820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 67,311
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             67,311
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    67,311
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .0019
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .0019


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Historic Preservation Properties 1989
LP ("HPP'89") on Form 10-QSB for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HPP'89.

/s/ Terrence P. Sullivan
---------------------------
Terrence P. Sullivan
General Partner
(Performing similar functions of the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer)

Date: August 12, 2004
Exhibit
      (10)(f)(9)


AMENDMENT
      NO. 8




TO




ALLTEL
      CORPORATION




1998
      MANAGEMENT DEFERRED
      COMPENSATION PLAN





WHEREAS,Alltel
      Corporation ("Alltel") maintains
      the Alltel Corporation 1998 Management Deferred Compensation Plan, effective
      June 23, 1998, as amended (the "Plan"); and




WHEREAS,Alltel
      desires to further amend the Plan
      regarding the crediting of earnings and interest under the Plan for all
      Participants, which shall also apply to any deferrals of those Participants
      of
      awards under the Alltel Corporation Performance Incentive Compensation Plan,
      as
      amended, and the Alltel Corporation Long-Term Performance Incentive Compensation
      Plan, as amended and any other plans as applicable;




NOW, THEREFORE,
      BE IT RESOLVED,that the
      Plan is hereby amended effective January 1, 2008, in the respects hereinafter
      set forth:




Article
      I of the Plan is amended to
      state:




“1.18.“Interest
      Rate”shall,
      except as otherwise provided in
      Section 3.3, mean a percentage equal to the “Prime Rate” as published in the
      first issue (in which “Prime Rate” is published) of the Wall Street Journal
      during each Year beginning after December 31, 1998, plus two hundred (200)
      basis
      points.  For each Year beginning after December 31, 2007, “Interest
      Rate” shall mean five hundred (500) basis points.”






IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF,Alltel has caused this
      Amendment to be executed on this 1st day of January, 2008.






ALLTEL
      CORPORATION





By:/s/
      Scott T.
      Ford


Title: President
      and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Qwest Corporation ("Qwest"), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of Qwest on Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Qwest. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit to such Form 10-K/A. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Qwest and will be retained by Qwest and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

|Dated: November 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/RICHARD C. NOTEBAERTRichard C. Notebaert
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/OREN G. SHAFFEROren G. Shaffer
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer     

---



QuickLinks
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4725 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of the 

Glover River in the State of Oklahoma as a component of the National 

Wild and Scenic Rivers System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2004 

Mr. CARSON of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 

a segment of the Glover River in the State of Oklahoma 

as a component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers 

System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Glover River Wild and 

5 Scenic River Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 The Congress finds the following: 
2 

•HR 4725 IH 

1 (1) The Secretary of Agriculture conducted a 

2 study of the eligibility and suitability of the Glover 

3 River in the State of Oklahoma for inclusion in the 

4 Wild and Scenic Rivers System. 

5 (2) With extensive public involvement, the For6 est Service prepared the ‘‘Final Environmental Im7 pact Statement Amendment to the Land and Re8 source Management Plan Management Direction for 

9 Acquired Lands in Southeastern Oklahoma’’, which 

10 contains an ‘‘Individual Assessment of Eligibility 

11 and Potential Classification of the Glover River’’. 

12 (3) The study and assessment concluded that 

13 the Glover River is eligible for inclusion in the Na14 tional Wild and Scenic Rivers System based on its 

15 free-flowing conditions and remarkable scenic, recre16 ation, geologic, archaeological, historical, and fish 

17 and wildlife values. 

18 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF SEGMENT OF GLOVER RIVER, 

19 OKLAHOMA, AS COMPONENT OF NATIONAL 

20 WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS SYSTEM. 

21 (a) DESIGNATION.—Section 3(a) of the Wild and 

22 Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by add23 ing at the end the following new paragraph: 

24 ‘‘(l) GLOVER RIVER, OKLAHOMA.—The 16.5 mile 

25 segment from the confluence of the West and East Forks 
3 

•HR 4725 IH 

1 of the Glover River in the Ouachita National Forest in 

2 section 7, township 3 south, range 23 east, downstream 

3 along the main stem of the Glover River to the southern 

4 boundary of the Ouachita National Forest, to be adminis5 tered by the Secretary of Agriculture as a scenic river.’’. 

6 (b) MANAGEMENT.—The Secretary of Agriculture 

7 shall develop and administer the comprehensive manage8 ment plan required by section 3(d)(1) of the Wild and Sce9 nic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(d)(1)) for the segment 

10 of the Glover River designated as a scenic river by this 

11 section in general accordance with the provisions of the 

12 Final Environmental Impact Statement Amendment 34 to 

13 the land and resource management plan of the Ouachita 

14 National Forest, dated January 8, 2002, that address the 

15 segment of the Glover River so designated. 

Æ
10864.

#### Kirkland *et al. v.*Addison, constable, for use, etc.

Decided March 18, 1920.

Stephens, J.

I. Although the bill of exceptions recites that there was an amendment to the motion for a new trial, it does not specify such amendment as being a part of the record and material to a clear understanding of the errors complained of, and there does not appear in the record sent to this court any amendment to the motion for a new trial. This court, therefore, can consider only the original motion for a new trial, which contains only the general grounds.

2. This being a suit against the principal and the surety on a forthcoming bond given by the defendant in fl. fa., in which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for a breach of the bond, and the evidence showing a failure of the defendant to produce the property at the time and place of sale after due advertisement, and a resulting damage therefrom to the plaintiff, the verdict for the plaintiff was not contrary to law for any reason insisted’ upon under the general grounds.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*

*86Appeal; from Haralson superior court — Judge Irwin. July 1, 1919.

*J. S. Edwards,*for plaintiff in error.

*Griffith & Matthews,*contra.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual Report on Form 10-K of Monmouth Capital Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Eugene W. Landy, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Anna T. Chew, as Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

















By:       /s/ Eugene W. Landy

Name:  Eugene W. Landy

Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer

Date

April 11, 2007













By:       /s/ Anna T. Chew

Name:  Anna T. Chew

Title:    Chief Financial Officer

Date:    April 11, 2007