alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An	End-to-End	Research	Platform	for	Public	Safety	Communications	above	6	GHz

Thrust	1:	Channel	sounding	for	PSC	links

(a) 60	GHz	SiBeam Phased	Array	

with	12	steerable	antenna	

elements	and	45	degree	

steerable	range.	

(b) The	phased	array	is	mounted	

on	steerable	gimbal	to	

simulate	orientation	motion.

(c) Preliminary	spatially	resolved	

dynamic	measurements	in	a	

human	blocking	scenario.

GOAL:	Measure	dynamic	directional	channels	in	PSC	scenarios.

Thrust	2:	Software-defined	Radio

GOAL:	Prototyping	new	ultra-low	latency	MAC	and	sychronization

algorithms	likely	to	be	used	in	the	PSC	links.

(a) Fast	initial	access	and	

directional	synchronization.	

(b) Flexible	frame	structures.

(c) Ultra	low	latency.

Thrust	3:	Channel	emulation

Top:	Traditional	emulation	paradigm	where	the	DUTs	

interface	with	the	emulator	over	RF.	This	emulation	paradigm	

is	unsuitable	for	systems	with	a	large	number	of	antennas.

Bottom:	Proposed	emulation	paradigm	where	the	DUTs	

interface	with	the	emulator	in	baseband	enabling	support	of	

large	numbers	of	elements.

GOAL:	Provide	the	first	scalable	real-time	emulation	

of	complex	mmWave channels	in	PSC	settings.

Thrust	4:	End-to-end	network	simulation

GOAL:	Development	and	integration	of	PSC	specific	scenarios.

4G	LTE

custom	5G

mmW PHY/MAC

custom	5G

mmW channel

MultiModelSpectrumChannel

MmWaveSpectrumPhy MmWaveSpectrumPhy

MmWaveEnbPhy MmWaveUePhy

MmWaveEnbNetDevice MmWaveUeNetDevice

LteRlcAm/Um

LtePdcp

LteEnbRrc

MmWave

Beamforming

MmWavePropagation

LossModel

AntennaArrayModel

MiErrorModel

IP

TCP/UDP

Application

EpcEnbApplication

GTP

UDP

IP

MmWaveEnbMac

Scheduler

MmWaveUeMac

LteRlcAm/Um

LtePdcp

LteEnbRrc

mmWave eNodeB mmWave UE

GTP

UDP

IP

IP

EpcPgwSgwApp

PGW/SGW

IP

TCP/UDP

Application

Remote	Host

Class	diagram	for	the	end-to-end	mmWave module.

Left:	Statistical	channel	model	overlaid	with	real	

blockage	measurements.	

Center:	Real	measurements	overlaid	with	ray-tracing.

Right:	3GPP	channel	model	and	performance	of	

different	beamforming	strategies.

TEAM

PI:	Sundeep Rangan

Co-PI:	Ted	Rappaport

Co-PI:	Michele	Zorzi

Co-PI:	Andrea	Zanella

Richard	Davis

Coitt Kessler

James	Zottarelli

Senior	Personnel:	Marco	Mezzavilla

Postdoc:	Aditya	Dhananjay
No. 87-6115.

#### Carlin *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 4.41


 


Deed of access, indemnity and
insurance – Mr Robert G Elstone


 


The
Deed of access, indemnity and insurance of Mr Robert G Elstone is incorporated
by reference to National Australia Bank Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Commission
on January 20, 2005
device setproperty EIguide SetVoltage 16
device setproperty EFflip SetVoltage 16
move Eiguide 2.0
move Efflip 2.0
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>          5
<MULTIPLIER>       1,000


<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              $   700
<SECURITIES>                                          2,296
<RECEIVABLES>                                        19,330
<ALLOWANCES>                                            518
<INVENTORY>                                          11,059
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     33,436
<PP&E>                                               59,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                       41,301
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       55,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                15,213
<BONDS>                                                 162
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                              1,348
<OTHER-SE>                                           37,660
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         55,623
<SALES>                                              92,572
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     92,572
<CGS>                                                71,155
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        71,155
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         14
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       2,448
<INCOME-TAX>                                            577
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   1,871
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          1,871
<EPS-BASIC>                                          1.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          1.60


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bio-Lok International Inc.(the
Registrant) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on September, 2003, hereof (the
Report), the undersigned officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |  |                                                                                                                                                        
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or5 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                 
|
| |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Bio-Lok International Inc.

/s/ Bruce L. Hollander

---
Exhibit 10.1

 

FIVE STAR QUALITY CARE, INC.

 

Summary of Director Compensation

 

The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the Directors of Five Star Quality Care, Inc. (the “Company”) for services as Directors, which is subject to modification at any time by the Board of Directors.

 

·                  Each Independent Director receives an annual fee of $40,000, plus a fee of $1,000 for each meeting attended.  Up to two $1,000 fees are payable if more than one board and board committee meetings are held on the same date.

 

·                  The chairpersons of our quality of care committee, audit committee, compensation committee and nominating and governance committee receive an additional annual fee of $17,500, $17,500, $7,500 and $7,500, respectively.

 

·                  Each Director receives a grant of 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on the date of the first board meeting following each annual meeting of stockholders (or, for Directors who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first board meeting attended).

 

·                  The Company generally reimburses all Directors for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Directors and for out of pocket costs incurred from their attending certain continuing education programs.
BOSTON FINANCIAL QUALIFIED HOUSING TAX CREDITS L.P. III
                             (A Limited Partnership)

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing
Tax Credits L.P. III (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.



                                  /s/Jenny Netzer
                                  -----------------------------------
                                  Jenny Netzer
                                  Principal Executive Officer and
                                  Principal Financial Officer
                                  Arch Street III, Inc., as
                                  Managing General Partner of
                                  Boston Financial Qualified
                                  Housing Tax Credits L.P. III

                                  Date:  February 14, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 132109 & (28) Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132109 COA: 268012

CORTEZ CUNNINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant. Wayne CC: 95-007486

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of March 30, 2007 , the prosecuting attorney wa s directed to answer the application for leave to appeal the August 2, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the answer having been received, the appli cation for leave to appeal is again considered. The prosecu tion has affirmatively stated its lack of objection to the defendant receiving 24 da ys of jail credit in this case. Accordingly, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appe al, we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court with directions to amend the ju dgment of sentence to reflect 24 days of credit for time served. In all other respec ts, leave to appeal is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2007

Clerk
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this o pinion should not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt exc ept unde r the limite d circumstances set forthin5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 20103 C onfer enc e Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. RO N N I E A N TH O N Y TH O M AS, D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e Sou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 4: 08- C R

- 368- 1
B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H A M , D AV IS, an d C L E M E N T , C i rcui t Ju dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * A ppeal i ng t he j udgm enti n a c r i m i nalc as e, R onni e An t hony Th om as pre se nt s ar gum ent s t hat he c onc ede s ar e forec l os ed by Un i t ed S t ate s v . D a ug h er ty , 26 4 F .3d 513 , 518 ( 5th C i r. 200 1) , w h i ch rej ect ed a C om m erce Cl a u s e c h a l l e n g e t o t h e fe l o n - i n - p o s s e s s i o n - o f

- a - f i r e a r m s t a t u t e , 18 U. S
. C. § 9 22 ( g)
. The ap pe l l ant ’ s m o t i o n f o r s um m ar y di s po s i t i o n i s G RA N TE D , and t he j u d g me n t o f

t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t i s A F F I RMED. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Aug ust18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
| 1.   | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May 12, 2011 | /s/ Joseph D. Reid                                                                                           Joseph D. ReidChief Executive Officer |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Cash
Plus V Financial Statements for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,109,368<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                   600,199<F2>
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,409
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      22,035,833<F3>
<DEPRECIATION>                               (183,025)<F4>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,579,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,942
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    23,563,842<F5>
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,579,784
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               575,871
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               308,638
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   267,233<F6>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F6>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F6>
<FN>
<F1>Includes cash and cash equivalents of $613,951 and investments in commercial
paper of $495,417.
<F2>Includes all receivables of the Partnership included in "Other Assets" on the
Balance Sheet.
<F3>Includes investment in Joint Venture.
<F4>Amortization of costs related to acquisition.
<F5>Equity of General Partners ($59,607) and Limited Partners $23,623,449.
<F6>Net Income allocated $2,672 to General Partners and $264,561 to the Limited
Partners.  Net Income per units is $0.13.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
*10901.*

#### Talmage, by next friend, *v.*Tift.

Decided September 17, 1920.

Rehearing denied September 27, 1920.

Action for damages; from Tift superior court—'Judge Bye. August 9, 1919.

Stephens, J.

1. Where laborers employed by a contractor are subject to the control of the employer and may be discharged by the latter, the contractor is, as respects the employment and control of the laborers, not an independent contractor. 14 R. C. L. 68.

2. In a suit to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff while employed as a laborer to work about a mill, where it appears from the evidence that the defendant was the owner of the mill, which was located upon his premises and, under a contract made by the defendant with another person, was operated by the latter, whose duty it was to furnish the necessary labor and saw lumber into shingles at a stipulated price to be paid by the defendant, the defendant supplying the lumber and the machinery and keeping the machinery in repair, which contract was subject to rescission and cancellation at any time, and where the defendant testified that to his knowledge the person operating the mill did not employ any children about the mill, and that he (the defendant) would not have allowed it, that the plaintiff’s injuries were treated by a physician employed by the defendant to look after and treat injured employees at the mill, and that the bill for the plaintiff’s treatment was paid by the defendant, the inference is authorized that the defendant had the right to control and discharge laborers employed about the mill, and that the contract between the defendant and the person operating the mill was not made by the defendant in good faith for the purpose of establishing an independent contract with the person operating the mill, but was made by the defendant for the purpose of avoiding responsibility for injuries to the laborers employed about the mill, and that the person operating the mill was not an independent contractor, but that the relation of master and servant existed between the defendant and the plaintiff. See, in this connection, Civil Code (1910), § 4415.

3. It appears, from the evidence, that the defendant visited the mill while the plaintiff was at work, thus authorizing the inference that the defendant knew of plaintiff’s presence and employment in the mill, and that the defendant had the right to prevent the plaintiff’s employment, thus authorizing the inference that his failure to do so amounted to permission to plaintiff to work in the mill, and that the plaintiff was under 12 years of age and was working about the mill in violation of the child-labor law, which was negligence per se on the part of the person responsible for the plaintiff’s employment or presence in the mill.

4. The evidence authorized the inference that the defendant’s negligence was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury, and it was therefore error to grant a nonsuit.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*

*640Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

*John Henry Poole,*for plaintiff.

*Fulwood & Hargrett,*for defendant.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LINDA L. CALHOUN, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CA 09-0417-CG-C

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, :

Commissioner of Social Security,

:

Defendant.

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED,

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying

claimant benefits be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g), see

Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 111 S.Ct. 2157, 115 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991), for further

proceedings not inconsistent with this decision. The remand pursuant to sentence four of §

405(g) makes the plaintiff a prevailing party for purposes of the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28

U.S.C. § 2412, Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 113 S.Ct. 2625, 125 L.Ed.2d 239 (1993), and

terminates this Court’s jurisdiction over this matter.

DONE and ORDERED this 29th day of March, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00417-CG-C Document 29 Filed 03/29/10 Page 1 of 1
JOSEPH PIOTROWSKI,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4115

Opinion filed February 6, 2015.

Certiorari – Original Jurisdiction.

Joseph Piotrowski, pro se, Petitioner.

Lisa Martin, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.