alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                                   35,600
<SECURITIES>                                                             50,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         5,541,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            981,281
<INVENTORY>                                                           4,544,407
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      6,686,577
<PP&E>                                                               19,407,304
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       14,999,294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       35,696,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                18,902,063
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                                  3,739
<OTHER-SE>                                                            (583,393)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         52,740,187
<SALES>                                                               8,276,366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      8,276,366
<CGS>                                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         6,733,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      1,509,212
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      996,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     (2,240,329)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 (2,240,329)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         899,936
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        (1,340,393)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                              (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            (0.19)


</TABLE>
Ex-99.3 a)

                      Officer's Certification of Servicing
                                      2002

The undersigned officer certifies to the best of his/her knowledge the following
for the 2002 fiscal year:

I        have reviewed the activities and performance of Alliance Mortgage
         Company during the preceding fiscal year under the terms of the
         Servicing Agreement, Trust Agreement, Polling and Servicing Agreement
         and/or Seller/Servicer Guide. To the best of this Officers' knowledge,
         we have fulfilled all of its duties, responsibilities or obligations
         under these Agreements throughout such year;

I        have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions
         Insurance Policy and any other bonds required under the terms of the
         Servicing Agreement, Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement
         and/or Seller/Service Guide are in full force and effect;

All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded.

/s/ Michael C. Koster


January 22, 2003



Ex-99.3 b)


                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

         Re:      Structured Assets Mortgage Investments Inc., Mortgage
                  Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1999-4

I, Mario R. Fegan. Jr., hereby certify that I am the Vice President, Master
Servicing, of Impac Funding Corporation (the "Servicer"). I further certify,
with respect to the servicing agreement by which the Servicer services the loans
in connection with the above referenced trust (the "Servicing Agreement"), as
Servicer, the following:

1. I have reviewed the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar
year and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement;

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all its obligations under the Servicing Agreement for such year;

3. I have reviewed the activities of each Sub-Servicer during the Sub-Servicer's
most recently ended fiscal year on or prior to December 31, 2002 and its
performance under its Sub-Servicing Agreement; and

4. To the best of my knowledge, based on my review and the certification of an
officer of each Sub-Servicer, each Sub-Servicer has performed and fulfilled its
duties, responsibilities and obligations under the Servicing Agreement and its
Sub-Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the year.




<PAGE>

Date:    4/09/03
         --------------------------


                                   IMPAC FUNDING CORPORATION,
                                   as Master Servicer


                                   By: /s/ Mario R. Fegan, Jr.
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Mario R. Fegan, Jr.
                                       Title: Vice President, Master Servicing
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4827 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4827

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Colorado Canyons National Conservation Area and Black 
  Ridge Canyons Wilderness Act of 2000 to rename the Colorado Canyons 
National Conservation Area as the McInnis Canyons National Conservation 
                                 Area.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4827

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Colorado Canyons National Conservation Area and Black 
  Ridge Canyons Wilderness Act of 2000 to rename the Colorado Canyons 
National Conservation Area as the McInnis Canyons National Conservation 
                                 Area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MCINNIS CANYONS NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA.

    (a) Purpose.--The Colorado Canyons National Conservation Area and 
Black Ridge Canyons Wilderness Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 460mmm et seq.) 
is amended in section 2(b) by striking ``Colorado Canyons'' and 
inserting ``McInnis Canyons''.
    (b) Definitions.--Section 3 of such Act is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Colorado'' and 
        inserting ``McInnis''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``Colorado'' and 
        inserting ``McInnis''.
    (c) Colorado Canyons National Conservation Area.--Section 4 of such 
Act is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``colorado'' and inserting 
        ``mcinnis''; and
            (2) in subsection (a), by striking ``Colorado Canyons'' and 
        inserting ``McInnis Canyons''.
    (d) Advisory Council.--Section 8(a) of such Act is amended by 
striking ``Colorado Canyons'' and inserting ``McInnis Canyons''.
    (e) Short Title.--Section 1 of such Act is amended by striking 
``Colorado'' and inserting ``McInnis''.
    (f) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the ``Colorado Canyons 
National Conservation Area'' shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``McInnis Canyons National Conservation Area''.
    (g) Effective Date.--This section and the amendments made by this 
section take effect on January 1, 2005.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
11401.

#### Rogers *v.*The State.

Decided May 11, 1920.

Indictment for possession of liquor; from Muscogee superior • court — Judge Howard. February 21, 1920.

*R. Terry,*for plaintiff in error.

*C. F. McLaughlin, solicitor-general,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

The first and second grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial are but amplifications of the general grounds; the special grounds of the motion are without merit; there was evidence to support the finding of the jury, which is approved by the trial judge, and the judgment is

*Affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

 )

V. ) CR. NO. 07-00242-CG

 )

ARNOLD KNIGHT, )

 )

 Defendant. )

ORDER

This matter came on for a competency hearing on April 2, 2008, at which the parties

advised that they had no additional evidence to present in addition to the evaluation from the

Federal Detention Center in Miami, Florida. Therefore, the court adopts the findings of the

Bureau of Prison’s Psychological Evaluation dated January 7, 2008, and finds by a

preponderance of the evidence that the defendant, Arnold Knight, is competent to stand trial.

As the defendant advised the court that he intended to plead to the indictment, a change

of plea hearing is hereby scheduled for Wednesday, April 23, 2008, at 9:00 a.m., to be held in

courtroom 2B, United States Courthouse, Mobile, Alabama. 

The United States Marshal is ORDERED to produce the defendant for that hearing.

DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of April, 2008.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cr-00242-CG-M Document 24 Filed 04/08/08 Page 1 of 1
COURT OF CHANCERY

OF THE

STATE OF DELAWARE

J OSEPH R. S LIGHTS III

V ICE C HANCELLOR 417 S. State Street

Dover, Delaware 19901

Telephone: (302) 739

- 4397

Facsimile: (302) 739

- 6179

Date Submitted: November 9, 2017

Date Decided: November 20, 2017

C. Scott Reese , Esquire James J. Haley, Jr., Esquire

Cooch and Taylor, P.A. Ferrara & Ha ley

1000 West Street, 10th Floor 1716 Wawaset Street

Wilmington, DE 19801 Wilmington, DE 19806

Re: Frank Robino III v. Paul Robino

C.A. No. 10871

- VCS

Dear Counsel :

To follow is my decision on Defendant, Charles Robino’s Motion to Stay

Execution on Appeal. (DI 134)

. When deciding whether a stay is appropriate under

Court of Chancery Rule 62 and Supreme Court Rule 32(a), the Court must: (1) make

a preliminary assessment of the likelihood of success on the merits of the appeal;

(2) assess whether the petitioner will suffer irreparable injury if the stay is not

granted; (3) assess whether any other interested party will suffer substantial harm if

the stay is granted; and (4) determine whether the public interest will be harmed ifFrank Robino III v. Paul Robino

C.A. No. 10871

- VCS

November 20 , 2017

Page 2

the stay is granted. 1 When assessing t he likelihood of success on appeal, the court

considers whether the appeal raises “a substantial question that is a fair ground for

litigati on and . . . more deliberative investigation.” 2 After reviewing Defendant’s

motion, I cannot conclude that Mr. Robi no’s appeal meets this standard.

According to the Defendant, he will appeal the Court’s denial of his motion

to disqualify the law firm of Co och & Taylor PA as counsel for the P laintiff. He

contends that the Court did not give proper consideration to his motion. While it is

correct that the Court’s letter, dated October 6, 2017 (DI 126), did not reference

Defendant, Charles Ro bino’s initial motion to disqualify (DI 79), that does not mean

the Court did not consider the merits of the motion when determini ng that it should

be denied. Mr. Ro bino filed his motion to disqualify and then shortly thereafter

submitted to voluntary mediation with the Plaintiff (knowing that Cooch & Taylor

was serving and would serve as co unsel to the Plaintiff). Mr. Ro bino was

r epresented at the mediation by his own counsel. He agreed to a binding settlement

1 Kirpat, Inc. v. Del. Alcoholic Beverage Control Comm’ n

, 741 A.2d 356, 357 (Del. 1998).

2 Id. at 358.Frank Robino III v. Paul Robino

C.A. No. 10871

- VCS

November 20 , 2017

Page 3

at that mediation. That he believed before mediation, or believes now, that Cooch &

Taylor should be disqualified as counsel cannot serve as a basis for Mr. R o bino to

avoid the settlement he reached after voluntarily participating in a mediation,

without objection, where Cooch & Taylor represented his adversary . This is

particularly so given that he knew full well all of the circumstances that he believed

justified disquali fication at the time of the meditation

.

The Motion to Stay Execution on Appeal is DENIED

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Joseph R. Slights III
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

PATRICK JOSEPH CHAREST, : 

AIS 182262, 

: 

Petitioner, 

: 

vs. CA 10-0067-CG-C 

: 

BILLY MITCHEM, 

: 

Respondent. 

 

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, 

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the present habeas corpus petition, filed pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. ' 2254, be dismissed with prejudice due to petitioner=s failure to comply with 

28 U.S.C. ' 2244(b)(3)(A). Charest is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, 

therefore, he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. 

DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of June, 2010.

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Case 1:10-cv-00067-CG-C Document 15 Filed 06/08/10 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned Directors and Officers
of Millipore Corporation (the "Corporation"), do hereby constitute and appoint
C. William Zadel, Kathleen Allen and Jeffrey Rudin and each of them
individually, their true and lawful attorneys and agents to execute on behalf of
the Corporation the Form 10-K Annual Report of the Corporation for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2000, and all such amendments or additional instruments
related thereto which such attorneys and agents may deem to be necessary and
desirable to enable the Corporation to comply with the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any regulations, orders, or
other requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
thereunder in connection with the preparation and filing of said documents,
including specifically, but without limitation of the foregoing, power and
authority to sign the names of each of such Directors and Officers on his
behalf, as such Director or Officer, as indicated below to the said Form 10-K
Annual Report or documents filed or to be filed as a part of or in connection
with such Form 10-K Annual Report; and each of the undersigned hereby ratifies
and confirms all that said attorneys and agents shall do or cause to be done by
virtue thereof.


SIGNATURE                TITLE                     DATE
---------                -----                     ----


/s/ C. William Zadel     Chairman, President       February 15, 2001
--------------------
C. William Zadel         Chief Executive Officer
                         and Director


/s/ Daniel Bellus        Director                  February 15, 2001
-----------------
Daniel Bellus


/s/ Robert C. Bishop     Director                  February 15, 2001
--------------------
Robert C. Bishop
<PAGE>

/s/ Robert E. Caldwell   Director                  February 15, 2001
----------------------
Robert E. Caldwell


/s/ Maureen A. Hendricks Director                  February 15, 2001
------------------------
Maureen A. Hendricks
<PAGE>

SIGNATURE                TITLE                     DATE
---------                -----                     ----


/s/ Mark Hoffman         Director                  February 15, 2001
----------------
Mark Hoffman


/s/ Richard J. Lane      Director                  February 15, 2001
-------------------
Richard J. Lane


/s/ Thomas O. Pyle       Director                  February 15, 2001
------------------
Thomas O. Pyle


/s/ John F. Reno         Director                  February 15, 2001
----------------
John F. Reno
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KEVIN JEROME JOHNSON, :

 :

Plaintiff, :

 :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-00584-CB-B

 :

PEDEHEL MARTIN, et al., :

 :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this

file deemed relevant to the issue raised, and there having been

no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as

the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and

is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute

and to obey the Court's Order.

DONE this 12th day of January, 2010.

S/Charles R. Butler, Jr. 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00584-CB-B Document 4 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 1
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Abram Jerry Aldaco

, * From the 396 th District

Court of Tarrant County,

Trial Court No. 1323018D

Vs. No. 11

- 13

- 00 346

- CR * March 27, 2014

T he State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal

should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the appeal

is dismissed.
EX-10.18



 Exhibit 10.18 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED UNDER RULE 406 UNDER 

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. 

[*****] INDICATES OMITTED MATERIAL THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF A CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT 

REQUEST FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. THE OMITTED MATERIAL 

HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. 
  





 
 Christoph Sarry 

Global Alliance Director, Pharma Partnering 

Building 71 I 5.70 
 F.Hoffmann-La
Roche Ltd 
 Grenzacherstrasse 124 

4070, Basel 
 Switzerland 

28th February 2013 

Re: Amended and Restated License Agreement dated December 10, 2008 (“Agreement”) by and between Roche Palo Alto LLC,
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (collectively “Roche”) and Biotte Therapies Inc. (formely Synosia Therapeutics Inc.} and Biotie Therapies AG (formely Synosia Therapeutics AG) (rollectively
“Biotie”). 
 Dear Christoph 

Capitalized terms not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement. 

On 20th October 2009, Roche and Biotie signed the 2nd Letter Agreement which gave Biotie the right to an option to expand the Tier 2 and Tier 3 Field. On 16th June 2010, Biotie informed Roche of
our decision to exercise the right to obtain the option and paid the Field Expansion Option Fee of [*****]. In accordance with the 2nd Letter Agreement, the Field Expansion Exercise Fee of
[*****] was due on or before 31st December 2012. On 11th September 2012, Roche and Biotie signed the 4th Letter Agreement which included an extension of the deadline for payment of the Field Expansion Exercise Fee to 30th April 2013. 

Biotie is now informing Roche of our intention to exercise the Field Expansion with immediate effect, and we would request that you issue us
with an invoice to allow payment of the Field Expansion Exercise Fee. 
 Please address the invoice to: 

Biotie Therapeutics Ltd 
 Attn:
Mr. Michael Mulqueen 
 VP Operations 

Aeschenvorstadt 36 
 4051 Basel

 Yours sincerely 
 Biotie
Therapies Inc. 
 /s/ Ian J. Massey 

lan Massey, Ph.D. 
 Chief
Operating Officer & President of US Operations 
  

			
	Biotie Therapies Inc.		Tel. [*****]
	601 Gateway Boulevard		Fax. [*****]
	Suite 1200		www.biotie.com
	South San Francisco		
	CA 94080, USA
**Exhibit32.2****Certification of    Chief Financial Officer Sarbanes-Oxley Act    Section 906**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, the undersigned    officer of National City Corporation (the “Company”),    hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the    Company’s Annual Report on    Form 10-K    for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the    “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the    Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial    condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date: February 13, 2008     By: /s/ Jeffrey D. Kelly          Jeffrey D. Kelly
Summary of Compensation of Nonemployee Directors



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 Compensation of Nonemployee Directors 
  
 The form and amount of compensation paid to Bank of America’s nonemployee directors is reviewed from time to time by the Compensation Committee of Bank of
America’s Board of Directors. On December 13, 2005, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, Bank of America’s Board of Directors approved the following compensation package for nonemployee directors to take effect as of
the Spring 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: 
  

	 	•	 	Annual cash award in the amount of $80,000 


	 	•	 	Annual restricted stock award in the amount of $160,000 


	 	•	 	Committee chairperson annual retainer in the amount of $30,000 for the Audit Committee and $20,000 for each of the Asset Quality, Compensation, Corporate Governance and Executive
Committees 

  
 Effective as of the Spring 2006 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, Bank of America will cease providing meeting fees to nonemployee directors. The annual restricted stock award will continue to be provided under the Bank of America Corporation Directors’ Stock Plan and will continue to be subject
to a one-year vesting requirement. Nonemployee directors will also continue to be eligible to defer their compensation under the Bank of America Corporation Director Deferral Plan.