alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4620 

To confirm the authority of the Secretary of Agriculture and the Commodity 

Credit Corporation to enter into memorandums of understanding with 

a State regarding the collection of approved State commodity assessments 

on behalf of the State from the proceeds of marketing assistance loans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2004 

Mr. NETHERCUTT (for himself and Mr. HASTINGS of Washington) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To confirm the authority of the Secretary of Agriculture 

and the Commodity Credit Corporation to enter into 

memorandums of understanding with a State regarding 

the collection of approved State commodity assessments 

on behalf of the State from the proceeds of marketing 

assistance loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4620 IH 

1 SECTION 1. COLLECTION OF APPROVED STATE COM2 MODITY ASSESSMENTS ON BEHALF OF 

3 STATES FROM MARKETING ASSISTANCE 

4 LOAN PROCEEDS. 

5 (a) COLLECTION ON BEHALF OF STATES.—Subtitle 

6 B of title I of the Farm Security and Rural Investment 

7 Act of 2002 is amended by inserting after section 1209 

8 (7 U.S.C. 7939) the following new section: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 1210. COLLECTION OF APPROVED STATE COMMODITY 

10 ASSESSMENTS ON BEHALF OF STATES FROM 

11 MARKETING ASSISTANCE LOAN PROCEEDS. 

12 ‘‘(a) COLLECTION ON BEHALF OF STATES.—At the 

13 request of a State, the Secretary or the Commodity Credit 

14 Corporation shall enter into a memorandum of under15 standing with the State to collect, on behalf of the State, 

16 approved State commodity assessments from the proceeds 

17 of marketing assistance loans. 

18 ‘‘(b) EFFECT OF ASSESSMENT RATE CHANGES.— 

19 The Secretary and the Commodity Credit Corporation 

20 may not terminate a memorandum of understanding with 

21 a State for the collection of approved State commodity as22 sessments (or refuse to extend or modify such a memo23 randum of understanding) on the grounds that the State 

24 has changed the assessment rate.’’. 

25 (b) REINSTATEMENT OF MEMORANDUMS.—The Sec26 retary of Agriculture and the Commodity Credit Corpora-
3 

•HR 4620 IH 

1 tion shall reinstate, at the request of a State, any memo2 randum of understanding that was entered into between 

3 the Secretary or the Corporation and the State for the 

4 collection of approved State commodity assessments on be5 half of the State, but was terminated before the date of 

6 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
11023.

#### Floyd *v.*Massachusetts Mills in Georgia.

Decided July 19, 1920.

Revival of judgment; from city court of Floyd county—■ Judge Nunnally. October 9,1919.

*Judson*Andrews, *L. L. Meadors,*for plaintiff in error.

*Maddox & Doyal,*contra.

Jenkins, P. J.

1. It is the duty of a reviewing court to raise the question of its jurisdiction in all cases in which there may be any doubt as to the existence of such jurisdiction. *Welborne*v. *State,*114 *Ga.*793, 796 (40 S. E. 857); *Tillman*v. *Groover,*ante, 118 (102 S. E. 879).

2. Except in case of fast writs* appellate courts have no jurisdiction to consider a writ of error until after a final judgment in the court below, or unless a judgment such as the plaintiff in error contends should have been rendered instead of the one complained of would have been a final judgment. Park’s Code, § 6138. Therefore a writ of error will not lie to an order overruling the plaintiff’s demurrer to the plea of the defendant, where it does not appear that a final judgment has been rendered and exception taken thereto. *Johnson*v. *Battle,*120 *Ga.*649 (48 S. E. 128) ; *Tinsley*v. *Gullett Gin Co.,*21 *Ga. App.*512 (94 S. E. 892) ; *Turner*v. *Strauss-Epstein Co.,*20 *Ga. App.*735 (93 S. E. 234) ; *Carhart*v. *Mackle,*22 *Ga.*520 (96 S. E. 591).

3. The exceptions in this case being taken merely to the action of the trial judge in failing to sustain the plaintiff’s demurrer interposed to the plea of the defendant, and it not appearing that any final judgment has been entered in the ease and that exception has been taken thereto, the bill of exceptions in this case must be dismissed. The plaintiff in error is, however, granted leave, should he desire to do so, to file his bill of exceptions as exceptions pendente lite in the case. Park’s Code, §§ 6205, 6154.

*Writ of error dismissed, with direction.*

*Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.*
IB 

Union Calendar No. 415 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4470 

[Report No. 108–676] 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to extend the authorization of appropriations for the Lake Pontchartrain Basin Restoration 

Program from fiscal year 2005 to 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 1, 2004 

Mr. VITTER (for himself, Mr. BAKER, Mr. JEFFERSON, and Mr. TAUZIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2004 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to extend 

the authorization of appropriations for the Lake Pontchartrain Basin Restoration Program from fiscal year 

2005 to 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That section 121 (f)(1) of the Federal Water Pollution 
2 

•HR 4470 RH 

1 Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273 (f)(1)) is amended by strik2 ing ‘‘2005’’ and inserting ‘‘2010’’. 

Union Calendar No. 415 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4470 

[Report No. 108–676] 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 

gram from fiscal year 2005 to 2010. the Lake Pontchartrain Basin Restoration Proto extend the authorization of appropriations for 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2004 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-93,754-01

EX P ARTE KWAM AE LADON NEWBY, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W17-75404-K (A) IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT # 4 F ROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant pleade d g uilty to ag g rava ted robber y and was sentenc ed to thi rt y y ear s’ imprisonment. Applicant did not a ppeal his c onviction. Applicant filed this a pplication for a writ of habeas cor

pus in the county

of convic tion, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends, among other things, that his plea was involuntary beca use trial counsel failed to investiga te his backg round and incorre ctly advised him on his ability to be place d on community

supervision. Fur

ther, Applica

nt alleg es that trial counsel wa s ineffe ctive for failing to file a motion for new trial and for failing to file a notice of appea l. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Hi l l v. L o ck

h a r t , 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent , 3932

S.W .3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d. The trial court is the appropriate forum for f indings of f

act. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d) . The trial court shall order trial co u n s el t o re spond to Applicant’s claims. Trial counsel’s response should include whether Applicant reque sted trial counsel file a mot ion for new trial and notice of appe al, whether trial counsel investiga ted Applicant’s backg round, an d what trial counsel told Applicant reg arding his ability to be place d on community supervision. I n developing the rec ord, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is ind i gen t and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . ar t

. 2 6 .04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’ s name. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s plea was involuntary and wh ether trial counsel’s perf ormanc e was defic ient. The trial court may make any other finding s and conclusions that it deems appropr iate in response to Applicant’s claims. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and co n clusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court. Filed: June 22, 2022 Do not publish
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4385 

To provide for the suspension from Federal procurement and nonprocurement 

activities of persons that have not paid a fine resulting from a violation 

of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 that causes the 

death of an employee. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2004 

Mr. LYNCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for the suspension from Federal procurement 

and nonprocurement activities of persons that have not 

paid a fine resulting from a violation of the Occupational 

Safety and Health Act of 1970 that causes the death 

of an employee. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4385 IH 

1 SECTION 1. FEDERAL CONTRACTS SUSPENSION FOR UN2 PAID FINES RESULTING FROM VIOLATIONS 

3 OF OSHA THAT CAUSE DEATH OF AN EM4 PLOYEE. 

5 (a) SUSPENSION.—Section 17(e) of the Occupational 

6 Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 666(e)) is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘(e)’’ and inserting ‘‘(e)(1)’’; 

9 and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(2)(A) The Secretary shall suspend a person from 

13 procurement activities and nonprocurement activities upon 

14 a finding by the Secretary that the person has not paid 

15 a fine imposed for a violation of paragraph (1). Such sus16 pension shall continue until a finding by the Secretary 

17 that the fine is paid. 

18 ‘‘(B) In this paragraph: 

19 ‘‘(i) The term ‘suspend’ means to disqualify, 

20 pursuant to established administrative procedures, 

21 from Government contracting and subcontracting, or 

22 from participation in nonprocurement activities. 

23 ‘‘(ii) The term ‘procurement activities’ means 

24 all acquisition programs and activities of the Federal 

25 Government, as defined in the Federal Acquisition 

26 Regulation. 
3 

•HR 4385 IH 

1 ‘‘(iii) The term ‘nonprocurement activities’ 

2 means all programs and activities involving Federal 

3 financial and nonfinancial assistance and benefits, as 

4 covered by Executive Order No. 12549 and the Of5 fice of Management and Budget guidelines imple6 menting that order.’’. 

7 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Federal Acquisition Regula8 tion and the guidelines implementing Executive Order No. 

9 12549 shall be revised to include provisions to carry out 

10 the amendments made by subsection (a). 

Æ
Exhibit 12.  Questar Gas Company Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges  Year Ended December 31,200820072006(dollars in millions)EarningsIncome before income taxes$64.2$59.7$58.9Plus interest expense25.223.822.6Plus allowance for borrowed funds usedduring construction0.80.70.4Plus interest portion of rental expense1.31.21.3$91.5$85.4$83.2Fixed ChargesInterest expense$25.2$23.8$22.6Plus allowance for borrowed funds usedduring construction0.80.70.4Plus interest portion of rental expense1.31.21.3$27.3$25.7$24.3Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges3.43.33.4  For purposes of this presentation, earnings represent income before income taxes adjusted for fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of total interest charges (expensed and capitalized), amortization of debt issuance costs and losses from reacquired debt, and the interest portion of rental expense estimated at 50%.
Order entered January 14 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 0 1411
- CR
ANTHONY PHIFER , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 29 2nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F1 4
- 75027
- V



### O RDER
The Court GRANTS the January 13, 2015 motion of Lori Ordiway to withdraw as appellant’s appointed counsel. We DIRECT the Clerk to remove Ms. Ordiway as appellant’s attorney of record.
We ORDER the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant in this appeal and to transmit to this Court, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental record containing the order appointing new counsel.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the
Honorable Brandon Birmingham , Presiding Judge, 29 2nd Judicial District Court; Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; and to the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal

shall be reinstated fifteen days from the date of this order or when the order appointing new
counsel is received.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
**ORDER**

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0217 IN THE MATTER OF: T.N.B., A.M.B., and S.M.B., Youths in Need of Care
.
ORDER Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Transfer Transcripts from DA 19 - 0570 to DA 20 - 0217 is GRANTED. The Clerk’s office is directed to transfer the transcripts filed in DA 19 - 0570 to DA 20- 0217
. Pursuant to Rule 9(6), Mont. R. App. Proc., this Court deems the record complete and filed from the date of this ordered transfer.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 13 2020

05/13/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0217
National Institute of Standards and T

Technology Administratio

U.S. Department of Comme

Consideration of Public Comm

Project 5: Reconstruction of the T

Environment

Richard G. Gann

William M. Pitts (Presenting

September 12, 2005
Nature of Comments Nature of Comments

 Very few received Editorial

 Label fire loads as “combustible fire loads” Explain the “soffit” at the core in the Case B, 

 Related Comments

•

How commenter did smoke plume calculation

•

How commenter did fire simulations

•

Add thickness requirements per ASTM E605 

the standard)

•

Tabulation of smoke puffs, jet fuel fireballs
Changes to Reports Changes to Reports

 Multiple editorial changes Extended Case D (WTC 2, thinner SFRM th

more severe fire) for 3 h, past burnout of fue

•

Determine whether longer fire time resulted i

overheated structural members in areas with 

•

Result only modestly different from simulation 

the collapse time of WTC 2

•

Enabled strengthened statement that, if the in

been displaced, the structure would not have heated by the severe fires
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Demorest, Chief Executive Officer of MOCON,Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MOCON,Inc.

 

 

Date: March 31, 2006
|   | /s/ Robert L. Demorest  |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert L. Demorest      |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Ronald Mustari, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of Whitehall
Limited, Inc. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Whitehall Limited, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on
such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.



|                         |  |                              
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Date: September 11, 2006 |  |                              
|                         |  | /s/ Ronald Mustari           
|                         |  | Ronald Mustari, President and
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer
Order entered January 14, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05 - 12 - 00455 - CV KIMBERLEY PETTIGREW, Appellant V. MEGAN REEVES & BRIAN A TROY, Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Collin County, Texas T rial Court Cause No. 004 - 03642 - 2011 

### O RDER Before the Court are appellees’ January 2, 2013 motion to dismiss the appeal and appellant’s January 8, 2013 response to the motion to dismiss. Appellees’ motion to dismiss is DENIED

. The reporter’s record in th is case is overdue. Accordingly, we ORDER Court Reporter Claudia Webb to file either the reporter’s record, written verification that no hearings were recorded, or written verification that appellant has not requested or paid for the record within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. We notify appellant that if we receive verification she has not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record, appellant’s brief will bedue within THIRTY DAYS of the date of the verification of nonpaymen t.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Sean M. Cary, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Willamette Valley
Vineyards, Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the
small business issuer and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2004
/s/ Sean M. Cary
    Sean M. Cary
    Chief Financial Officer