alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11


                        PREMIUMWEAR, INC. and SUBSIDIARY

                        Computation of Per Share Earnings



                                                Year ended
                                           -----------------------
                                           January 3,    January 4,
                                              1998         1997
                                           ----------   ----------
Basic Earnings Per Share:

   Weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding ................    2,309,000    2,068,000

       Net income ......................   $  837,000   $7,181,000

       Net income per common share .....   $     0.36   $     3.47
                                           ==========   ==========

Diluted Earnings Per Share:

   Weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding ................    2,309,000    2,068,000
   Common share equivalents from assumed
     exercise of options ...............       29,000       62,000
                                           ----------   ----------

       Total shares ....................    2,338,000    2,130,000

       Net income ......................   $  837,000   $7,181,000

       Net income per common share and
         common share equivalents ......   $     0.36   $     3.37
                                           ==========   ==========


Diluted net income per common share and common share equivalents is computed
using the weighted average number of shares and common share equivalents
outstanding during each period. Common share equivalents represent the dilutive
effects of outstanding stock options using the treasury stock method. The
calculation of diluted earnings per share uses the average market price for the
period.
Exhibit 32.1

 

**                                                THE MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY                                                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                                                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                                                      SECTION 906                                                                           OF THE                                                    SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of The MonarchCement Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof(the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicatedbelow, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to The MonarchCement Company and will be retained by The MonarchCement Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

Dated:  March 14, 2008

|   |   | /s/ Walter H. Wulf, Jr.               |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Walter H. Wulf, Jr.    President and     Chairman of the Board                                         |   |
11195.

#### Mayor and Council of Gainesville *v.*Robertson.

Stephens, J.

1. It nowhere appears that exceptions pendente lite were taken to the allowance of the amendment to the plaintiff’s petition. The assignment of error in the bill of exceptions to such allowance, coming too late, cannot be considered.

2. Where a petition alleges the erection and maintenance of a permanent nuisance whereby the plaintiff’s lands are permanently injured, and seeks to recover past and prospective damages, and there is allowed an amendment alleging that the nuisance is not of a permanent nature but is one that may be abated, which amendment seeks to recover only damages actually sustained within the period prescribed in the statute of limitations before the suit was brought, the petition, after having been amended, is not subject to demurrer upon the ground that the amendment sets out a new and distinct cause of action.

3. An allegation that "the plaintiff’s crops, on account of the alleged nuisance, decreased in value a specified amount per year during the four years prior to the filing of the suit was subject to a special demurrer upon the ground that the value of the crops each year during such period was not set out. Such error, however, is immaterial and is not sufficient to cause a reversal.

4. Even though a nuisance has been continuing from a time prior to the plaintiff’s acquisition of the land and prior to the period of time allowed by the statute within which suit may be brought, the plaintiff may, nevertheless, within the statutory period recover the full damage caused to his land by the continuation of the nuisance, and is not restricted *to damage*caused solely from an increase in tile noxious character of the nuisance, arising after the plaintiff acquired the property or within the period allowed by. the statute of limitations.

5. “ One . . may testify as to value if he has had an opportunity for forming a correct opinion.” Civil Code (1910), § *5875.*Where the rental value of land is claimed *to*have been impaired by an alleged nuisance, one who is familiar with the land and the conditions alleged to have been caused by the nuisance may testify to the relative rental values of the land under such conditions, and with such conditions removed.

*633Decided August 16, 1920.

Action for damages; from city court of Hall county — Judge. Wheeler. November 29, 1919.

*C. N.*Davis, *W. B. Sloan,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. A.*Charters, *H. H.*Perry, contra.

G. The evidence warranted the inference that the maintenance of a continuing nuisance by the defendant was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s damage. No reversible error appears, and the verdict is supported by the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*
EXHIBIT 4.32


 


Non-executive director
appointment letter – Mr Robert G Elstone


 


The Non-executive director appointment letter of Mr Robert G Elstone is
incorporated by reference to National Australia Bank Limited’s Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Commission on January 20, 2005
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DARRELL BURNSIDE, DOC #120208, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 2D18-565 STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 31, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, Michelle Sisco, Judge. Darrell Burnside, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
11344.

#### Ligon *v.*The State.

Decided May 11, 1920.

Indictment for attempt to commit burglary; from Fulton superior court — Judge Humphries. February 3, 1920.

*D. H. McWilliam,*for plaintiff in error.

*John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, E. A. Stephens,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

1. An indictment for an attempt to commit a crime must aver the intent and the overt act which constitutes the attempt. *Wilburn*v. *State,*22 *Ga. App.*614 (97 S. E. 87), and citations.

2. An indictment which charges the offense of an attempt to commit burglary, and which further alleges merely that the accused *“*in the county of Fulton and State of Georgia, on the 11th day of January, 1920, with force and arms, did attempt to break and enter the dwelling house of M. J. Sewell, where valuable goods were contained, with intent to- steal, contrary to the laws of said State and the good order, peace and dignity thereof,” is fatally defective in substance, in not alleging any overt act; and the defect is not waived by failure to demur. *O’Brien*v. *State,*109 *Ga.*51 (35 S. E. 112); United States *v.*Ford, 34 Fed. 26; *Wilburn*v. *State,*supra.

3. Under the above rulings, the court erred in-overruling the motion in arrest of judgment.

*Judgment reversed,*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 4.1


     

    Exhibit
      4.1

     

    

      CUSIP
        No.
        43741N 10 3

       

      
                           
                                                                                                          
S
          H
          A R E 

        ***0000***                                                                                                   
          ***0,000***

      


      
        

        
          Incorporated
            under the laws of the state 

          of
            Florida

        

         

      

      


      Authorized
        To Issue 100,000.000 Shares of COMMON Stock At $0.00001 Par Value

      


      This
        Certifies That                                                                                                   

      Is
        hereby
        issued                                fully
        paid and
        non-assessable Common Shares of the above named Corporation transferable
        only on
        the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly
        authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
        endorsed.

      


      In
        Witness Whereof,
        the said
        Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized
        officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed this             
        day of
               
        A.D.
           .

      


      


      


      


      


      


      ________________________________ 
______________________________

      SECRETARY                                                                                                                                                      
        PRESIDENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SYLVIA REESE, o/bo WHITNEY )

D. REESE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-0812-P-D

)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner )

of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

JUDGMENT

In accordance with this court’s Order entered this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED,

and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff benefits be

REVERSED and REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42

U.S.C. § 405(g), see Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991), for further proceedings consistent

with this opinion (see doc.14, p.1, ¶2).

The Remand pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g), makes plaintiff a prevailing party under the

Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, see Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993), and

terminates this court’s jurisdiction over the matter.

DONE the 3rd day of October, 2005.

 S/Virgil Pittman 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-00812-P-M Document 16 Filed 10/03/05 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of The InterGroup Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John V. Winfield, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: September 29, 2003                        /s/ John V. Winfield
                                                ----------------------------
                                                John V. Winfield, President
                                                and Chief Executive Officer




[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The InterGroup Corporation, Inc. and will be retained by The
InterGroup Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE>                                           7
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEUDLE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM
 STATEMENTS  OF FINANCIAL  POSITION AT MARCH 31, 1997;  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997;  AND  STATEMENTS  OF CASH FLOWS THREE MONTHS
 ENDED MARCH 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                       0000839759
<NAME>                      ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
<MULTIPLIER>                1,000
<CURRENCY>                  U.S. DOLLARS
       


<S>                                            <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           1,783,642
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     0
<MORTGAGE>                                     116,579
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 1,964,452
<CASH>                                         2,503
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             1,754
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         74,152
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,407,665
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                1,091,036
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          625,967
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     291,171
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,407,665
<PREMIUMS>                                     18,583
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            32,569
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             1,231
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 8,088
<BENEFITS>                                     41,260
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    2,085
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           6,011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,115
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,979
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            7,136
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7,136
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00785-CV

Maria TIJERINA and Tiburcia Holguin,

Appellants

v.

Jose German GOMEZ, Jorge Humberto Valadez, Jr. and Sonia Frausto,

Appellees

From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-05-26518-MCV

Honorable Cynthia L. Muniz, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs be taxed against appellants because the trial court 

ordered that appellants could proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.

SIGNED December 23, 2014.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of the President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Whitehall Limited, Inc.
(the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Ronald Mustari
|Ronald Mustari    
|September 11, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                       1,948,186
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,754,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                 ($146,884)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,418,159
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,107,128
<PP&E>                                      25,613,489
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,474,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,865,527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,316,550
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,860
<OTHER-SE>                                    (583,393)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,865,527
<SALES>                                      9,666,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,666,024
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,106,567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             434,760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                334,296
<INCOME-TAX>                                   183,619
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            150,677
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   150,677
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Ronald Mustari, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of Whitehall
Limited, Inc. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Whitehall Limited, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on
such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.

Date: September 11, 2006



/s/ Ronald MustariRonald Mustari, President andChief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: : NO. 542 APPOINTMENTTO THE CRIMINAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE DOCKET
ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2023, Tina O. Miller, Esquire, Allegheny County, is hereby appointed as amember of the Criminal Procedural Rules Committee fora term expiring January 1, 2027.