alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2021 325F.53

325F.53 RETAIL MERCHANDISE; PRICE MARKING.

Subdivision 1. Requirements. In any store primarily engaged in the sale of grocery products at retail 

using an electronic or magnetic scanner to read the price of grocery products presented for check-out, every 

canned, bottled, boxed or bagged item of merchandise sold or offered for sale at retail shall have the selling 

price conspicuously displayed. If a grocery product is canned, bottled, boxed or bagged, but sold in quantities 

of more than one in the containers in which the product came from the manufacturer or distributor, the price 

may be marked on the outer containers rather than on each individual item. 

Subd. 2. Nonapplication. Subdivision 1 does not apply to:

(a) food items intended to be consumed on or about the retail premises;

(b) grocery products sold by a store primarily engaged in the sale of grocery products at retail which

are under three cubic inches in size, weigh less than three ounces, and are priced under 30 cents;

(c) grocery products sold by a store primarily engaged in the sale of grocery products offered for a period

of seven days or less on sale in good faith at a price below the price such merchandise is usually sold for in 

the store, provided that the sale price is clearly indicated to the consumer by conspicuous sign or otherwise, 

located at or near the point of sale of such merchandise;

(d) cigarettes, cigars, tobacco and tobacco products with a retail price of $1 or less;

(e) items actually sold through vending machines; and

(f) any type of grocery product sold by a store primarily engaged in the sale of grocery products which

is not marked in accordance with the uniform products code or any similar marking system designed to be 

scanned by electronic or magnetic check-out equipment. 

Subd. 3. Retailer exemptions. In addition to the exemptions allowed in subdivision 2, a retailer may 

choose to not individually price mark not more than 25 classes of items or individual items which classes 

or items shall be set forth on a list posted in a conspicuous place in the retail store, and may choose to not 

individually price mark not more than 25 additional classes of items or individual items which are advertised 

or featured at a reduced price.

History: 1978 c 737 s 1; 2017 c 48 s 1 

1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2021 325F.54

325F.54 PENALTIES.

(a) Knowingly and willfully failing to have a clearly readable price indicated on more than six individual

items of the same commodity shall constitute a petty misdemeanor and each commodity not priced in 

compliance with sections 325F.53 to 325F.55 shall constitute a separate violation. Each day that a violation 

continues shall also constitute a separate violation;

(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person may bring an action to enjoin a violation of

sections 325F.53 to 325F.55. 

History: 1978 c 737 s 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6647

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JESSIE SCOTT, a/k/a Jay Scott,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, Senior 

District Judge. (1:04-cr-00453-TSE-1)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 3, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jessie Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, James 

L. Trump, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jessie Scott appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion for 

reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See United States v. Scott, No. 1:04-cr-00453-TSE-1 

(E.D. Va. filed Apr. 19, 2010 & entered Apr. 20, 2010). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.2
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Debra L. Spencer, Secretary/Treasurer of Imagenetix, Inc. (the "small
business issuer"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the small
business issuer;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

     4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small
business issuer and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the small business issuer,
          including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by
         others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
          disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
          covered by this report; and

     c)   presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
          the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the small business issuer's
          ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
          have identified for the small business issuers auditors any material
          weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the small business
          issuer's internal controls; and


Dated: 11/22/2004                    Signature:/s/Debra L. Spencer
                                               ----------------------
                                               Debra L. Spencer
                                               Secretary/Treasurer
United States Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

New Jersey

his laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international

system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented 

measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, and 

has demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope

(Rev.: September 2021)

Mass Echelon III

30 kg to 1 mg

1000 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Wheel Load Weighers

20 000 lb to 2500 lb

Volume Transfer, II

1500 gal to 5 gal

Volume Transfer, II LPG

100 gal to 20 gal

Length, Bench

Steel Tapes

500 ft to 1 ft

Rigid Rules

192 in to 6 in

Frequency

Tuning Forks

 7000 Hz

Time

Stopwatches

24 h to 1 h

2023

____________________________________

Katrice Lippa, Chief

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

Effective Dates: 2023-02-01 to 2024-02-01
Exhibit 32.2

                            MICROPAC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                             CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Micropac  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending Novemeber 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Patrick Cefalu, CFO of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



-----------------------------
Patrick Cefalu, CFO
(Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet of CNL Income Fund V, Ltd. at June 30, 1997, and its
statement of income for the six months then ended and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund V, Ltd.
for the six months ended June 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,683,441
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  188,175
<ALLOWANCES>                                   139,145
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      11,573,961
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,345,786
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,618,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,495,225
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,618,995
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               969,269
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  289,597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,007
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                662,606
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            662,606
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   662,606
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund V, LTD. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no values are shown above for
current assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification ofChief Executive Officerof Granite Broadcasting Corporation**

 

This certification is providedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies thequarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended June 30,2003 of Granite Broadcasting Corporation (the “Issuer”).

 

I, W. Don Cornwell, the ChiefExecutive Officer of Issuer certify that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(i)             theForm 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

 

(ii)          theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

 

Dated:  August 11, 2003.

 
|   | /s/              | W. DON  CORNWELL |   |
|--------|------------------|------------------|--------|
|   | W. Don  Cornwell |

 

 

----
#### William S. Woods, *et al.*plaintiffs and respondents, *vs.*Louis , F. De Figaniere, president, &c. defendant and appellant.

It was decided in this case that where a joint stock company were sued in the name of their president, as defendant, he might be examined as “a party.” That the order was not invalid, because the affidavit on which it was obtained did not show that the cause was at issue. That appearing and claiming to be exempt from examination relieved the plaintiff from "the burden of showing that his fees were paid, and that to authorize his punishment for contempt under the Code, it was not necessary to show that the plaintiff was prejudiced by his refusal to attend.

Heard in general term, before Bosworth, Ch. J. and Moncrief and Robertson, JJ.

February 21, 1863;

decided April 25, 1863.

See the points decided in the index to this volume, under the title “ Practice—Examination of Parties.” And see the order and the appeal therefrom, with the opinion of the court at general term,-reported in 16 *Abbott’s Pr.*1 *ante p.*607.
DIODE LASER-BASED EQUIVALENCE RATIO MEASUREMENT 

Kevin L. McNesby, Robert Daniel, Andrzej Miziolek, and Richard Wainner 

US Army Research Laboratory 

William M. Jackson Ian McLaren 

University of California-Davis McLaren Research 

ABSTRACT 

A diode laser-based sensor for rapid measurement (response time 10 msec) of vapor phase 

fuel/oxygen ratios is described. Experimental results are shown for vapor phase fuel/oxygen 

concentrations above pools of JP-8 fuel at different temperatures. Results are correlated with 

flashpoint data for several different hydrocarbon fuels. 

This work is supported by the Next-Generation Fire Suppression Technology Program (NGP). 

334 Halon Options Technical Working Conference 2-4 May 2MKl
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40502 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RONNIE AMHED CEDENO; TEOBALDO GAMBOA, Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:95-CR-159-1

- - - - - - - - - - June 9, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges:
PER CURIAM: * Ronnie Amhed Cedeno and Teobaldo Gamboa appeal their convictions for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute a controlled substance and possession with the intent to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). They argue that the evidence was insufficient to support their convictions; that the district court erred inNo. 96-40502 - 2 - denying their motions to suppress evidence; and that prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments deprived them of a fair trial. We conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found that the evidence established guilt of these crimes beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Ivey , 949 F.2d 759, 766 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 506 U.S. 819 (1992). We reject appellants’ argument that the district court erred in denying their motions to suppress. Anita Stambaugh was not acting as a government agent such as to give rise to Fourth Amendment concerns. United States v. Bazan , 807 F.2d 1200, 1202 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 481 U.S. 1038 (1987). Moreover, the affidavit supporting the search warrant was not so lacking in indicia of probable cause as to render official belief in its existence entirely unreasonable. United States v. Satterwhite , 980 F.2d 317, 320 (5th Cir. 1992). The district court did not

err. We similarly reject appellants’ argument that the prosecutor’s remarks during closing arguments deprived them of a fair trial. The record reveals that the remarks, when viewed individually or together, did not deprive them of a fair trial, and even if the remarks were prejudicial, the harm was remedied by the district court’s curative instructions. United States v. Montoya-Ortiz , 7 F.3d 1171, 1178 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT 

### LARRY BERNARD PACE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3517 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 13, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Charles E. Roberts, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Peter N. Koclanes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

AGUSTIN GUADALUPE

GONZALES-RODRIGUEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10233

D.C. No. 4:09-cr-02593-JMR

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

John M. Roll, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2010 ** 

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Agustin Guadalupe Gonzales-Rodriguez appeals from the 37-month

sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction to re-entry after deportation,

FILED

FEB 22 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-10233

in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

we dismiss.

Gonzales-Rodriguez contends that the district court erred when it applied the

16-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) after finding that

his prior conviction for statutory rape was a “crime of violence.” The valid and

enforceable appeal waiver set forth in the plea agreement precludes our review of

this issue. See United States v. Bibler, 495 F.3d 621, 623-24 (9th Cir. 2007). We

therefore enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal.

DISMISSED.
H. R. 4847

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 560 Bay

Isles Road in Longboat Key, Florida, as the ‘‘Lieutenant General James V.

Edmundson Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

560 Bay Isles Road in Longboat Key, Florida, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Lieutenant General James V. Edmundson

Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lieutenant

General James V. Edmundson Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### A. B. Bonta v. Abram Vanarsdale’s Admr.

Judicial Sales — Right of Creditor.

Where a creditor allowed another to bid in the land of the debtor at the commissioner’s sale, the creditor can not by excepting to the commissioner’s report of the sale, speculate on the purchaser's bargain, and have the land resold by offering a sum in excess of the purchaser’s bid.

APPEAL PROM' MERCER CIRCUIT COURT.

November 4, 1873.

*Thompson, E. T. Polk, for appellant.*

*Kyle & Poston, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

, There is no reason appearing in the record for disturbing the sale made by the commissioner. He states that it was conducted fairly and in pursuance of the judgment.

Eastland was a creditor of the estate and a competing bidder. If he desired to buy the land he should have offered on the day of sale what he seems now willing to give. He interposed no objection to the land being knocked off to Bonta, when it was so announced. If, when the commissioners cried the bid as that of Bonta’s, or rather when he pronounced Bonta the highest bidder, if the appellee had claimed .it as his bid, the commissioner could have proceeded at once to again offer the property. This he fáiled to do, and now offers $175.00 on Bonta’s bid, a sum hardly sufficient to pay the interest on the money and the costs attending a resale. There is conflicting proof as to' the value of the land, but conceding it to be worth the sum proved by appellee’s witnesses, it cannot affect the case. There must be some stability in sales ordered by the chancellor. These creditors of Vanarsdale knew the land and its value. They had an opportunity to buy it, and should not now be allowed to speculate on Bonta’s bargain. The exception to the commissioner’s report should have been overruled. The judgment or order setting the sale aside is reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to confirm it, and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraniteBroadcasting Corporation (the Company) on Form10-Q for the period ended June 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the Form 10-Q), we, W. Don Cornwell and Lawrence I. Wills, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

 

(i)                   the Form 10-Q fully complies, in allmaterial respects, with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)                the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

Dated:August 12, 2005.

 

 
|   | /s/     W. DON CORNWELL   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | W. Don Cornwell                                    |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer                            |   |
|   |                                               |   |
|   |                                               |   |
|   | /s/     LAWRENCE I. WILLS |   |
|   | Lawrence I. Wills                                  |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                            |   |

 

----