alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAVID WALKER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) Civil Action No. 08-0530-CG-M

)

BIOGISTICS, INC., et al, )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the motion for attorney Scott Hetrick to withdraw as

counsel for defendant Biogistics, Inc. due to irreconcilable differences. (Doc. 97) Defense

counsel represents that a copy of his motion has been served on Biogistics, Inc.

Upon due consideration, the motion is hereby GRANTED. Because corporations are

prohibited from appearing in federal court without counsel, See e.g., Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp.,

764 F.2d 1381, 1385 (11th Cir. 1985); National Independent Theatre Exhibitors, Inc. v. Buena

Vista Distribution Co., 748 F. 2d 602, 604 (11th Cir. 1984), the defendant is GRANTED leave

until February 4, 2010 to retain new counsel on its behalf. If counsel does not appear on the

defendant’s behalf, default will be entered against Biogistics, Inc. for failure to defend. 

DONE and ORDERED on this 21st day of January, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-00530-CG-M Document 99 Filed 01/21/10 Page 1 of 1
! " #$%&' !
!
(! )*"*" 


#(+,-,,-+,	+$,$#	,

.


//////////"//////////

#

"0
















$"
(1

#(1


*2 0
1


!
 "0

2 0
1

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

#30 .


 .

.
4 
 !"" .
  
#$

%&'
 .

003"0
03"
)"
 
*
"


.."

" )"
5 
*6)

*7

0


)6.
#

"

$00""3 " #$

%88 9."

" .09: .
3*6"
0
"
.#;%4


.
"

""
.#$%&''&9.

<
..
6
33*)*
9

IT IS ORDERED..
0"1

-(+- ;	(,-.


="3
 "*603"
"


03"0
(as reflected in 

the last judgment issued)  0."is reduced to 

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

-<
3".
7"
3
9**3"".
> 0

 ".**
0



IT IS SO ORDERED



1

Judge’s signature

-


1

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

 Southern District of Alabama

JOSHUA EDWARD LEDKINS 09-00107-001

10724-003

4-22-2010

Pro Se

✔

✔

168 135 months

4-22-2010

February 25, 2015

November 15, 2015 United States District Judge

Callie V.S. Granade 

U.S. District Judge

Digitally signed by Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge 

DN: cn=Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge, o=U.S. 

Government, ou=Federal Judiciary, 

email=efile_granade@alsd.uscourts.gov, c=US 

Date: 2015.02.25 15:02:22 -06'00'

Case 1:09-cr-00107-CG-B Document 177 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 1
MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE  

Supplier Scouting

CY2021 Supplier Scouting Metrics

• 118 opportunities scouted

– 3 opportunities from 2 federal agencies 

– 115 opportunities scouted for MEPNN

• 20 industries served

• 43 manufacturing processes

• 397 matches submitted by MEP Centers

• $130 million business opportunities

CY2022 Supplier Scouting Metrics

• 155 opportunities scouted

– 65 opportunities from 8 federal agencies

– 90 opportunities scouted for MEPNN

• 19 industries served 

• 33 manufacturing processes

• 98 matches submitted by MEP Centers

• $33.9 million business opportunities

1
#### Geo. W. Foster *v.*Robert Ewing.

Infants — Party Plaintiff.

An infant cannot be made a party plaintiff to an action for tbe purpose only of defeating bis rights.

APPEAL FROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT.

February 13, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

The answer of G. W. Foster presented a good defense h> the action of Ewing, so far as further proceedings at law were concerned. The amended petition by which the infant, James King, was attempted to be made a party plaintiff, did not remove the difficulty. It may well be doubted whether under the circumstances the court should have allowed the infant to be made a party without service of process upon him, as a defendant, or in case he appeared as plaintiff, without ascertaining whether or not he was actually apprised of the use that was being made of his name, and desired that the action should be prosecuted for his benefit.

It is certain, however, that he ought not to be permitted, under any circumstances, to make himself a party to the action and join in a pledge for a judgment which, if upheld as against him, would operate to his injury. By the amended petition King is made to unite in the prayer of the original petition, that is, that Ewing shall have judgment for his debt and that his (King’s) rights' shall be utterly disregarded.

Whilst infants are bound 'by actions prosecuted for their own benefit, by a next friend, we are aware of no case in which they have been held bound when the action is not intended for their benefit, and where they are made plaintiffs only for the purpose of defeating their rights. King is not bound by the judgment herein ren*504dered, and hence' the liability of G. W. Foster to him' will not be released by its payment. Said judgment must, therefore, be reversed. Upon the return of the cause Ewing should be allowed to' have it transferred to equity, and to take the proper steps to release Foster from liability on the administrator’s judgment. If he fails to do so within reasonable time, his petition should be dismissed without prejudice. As the pleadings now stand, King’s name should be stricken from the case.

*Brock, for appellant.*

*Ap per son, Reid, for appellee.*
Exhibit 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002           In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMDL, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for theperiod ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Gary L. Dreher, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        August 15, 2006 /s/ Gary L. Dreher   Gary L. Dreher   Acting Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4870 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4870

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the effective date for 
 payment of lump sums to persons awarded the Medal of Honor who are in 
receipt of special pension pursuant to section 1562 of such title, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2004

    Mr. Green of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the effective date for 
 payment of lump sums to persons awarded the Medal of Honor who are in 
receipt of special pension pursuant to section 1562 of such title, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EFFECTIVE DATE FOR PAYMENT OF LUMP SUMS TO PERSONS AWARDED 
              THE MEDAL OF HONOR.

    Section 1562(f) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1) by inserting ``on or after April 27, 
        1916,'' after ``under this section'';
            (2) in paragraph (2) by inserting ``or (4)'' after 
        ``paragraph (1)''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
    ``(3) If a person otherwise eligible for payment under paragraph 
(1) is deceased, the Secretary shall make the payment to the living 
person first listed below:
            ``(A) The decedent's spouse.
            ``(B) The decedent's children (in equal shares).
            ``(C) The decedent's dependent parents (in equal shares).
    ``(4) If a person is awarded the Medal of Honor posthumously on or 
after April 27, 1916, the Secretary shall pay, in a lump sum, an amount 
equal to the total amount of special pension that the person would have 
received during the period beginning on the first day of the first 
month beginning after the date of the act for which the person was 
awarded the Medal of Honor and ending on the last day of the month 
preceding the month in which the person died to the living person first 
listed below:
            ``(A) The decedent's spouse.
            ``(B) The decedent's children (in equal shares).
            ``(C) The decedent's dependent parents (in equal 
        shares).''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DALLAS LEVON SIMMONS, #180081, :

Petitioner, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0725-KD-C

WARDEN JOHN CUMMINS, :

Respondent. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated November 17, 2009, is ADOPTED as the

opinion of this Court. 

It is ORDERED that this action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District

Court for the Middle District of Alabama.

DONE and ORDERED this the 11th day of January 2010.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00725-KD-C Document 5 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1485 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1485

        To limit the price charged by manufacturers for insulin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2023

Ms. Bush (for herself, Ms. Clarke of New York, Ms. Garcia of Texas, Ms. 
 Tlaib, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Ms. Norton, Mr. Bowman, Mr. Green of Texas, 
  Ms. Pressley, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. Khanna, Mr. 
Payne, and Ms. Omar) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To limit the price charged by manufacturers for insulin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Insulin for All Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON PRICE OF INSULIN.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
price charged by manufacturers of insulin for insulin that is sold in 
the United States may not exceed $20 per 1000 units of insulin, which 
may be contained in one or more vials, pens, cartridges, or other forms 
of delivery.
    (b) Insulin Defined.--In this section, the term ``insulin'' means 
insulin that is licensed under subsection (a) or (k) of section 351 of 
the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262) and continues to be 
marketed pursuant to such licensure.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JENISE BROCKS, : 

 : 

Plaintiff, : 

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 10-0004-WS-M 

 : 

FARMERS INSURANCE, et al., : 

 : 

Defendants. : 

 ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file 

deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no 

objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge made under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion 

of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby 

DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to obey the 

Court's Order. 

DONE this 24th day of August, 2010. 

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:10-cv-00004-WS-M Document 10 Filed 08/24/10 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION**

**The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:**

(1) The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended April 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|Date:July 29, 2005 |  | /s/ M. G. DUNCAN       
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                   |  | M. G. Duncan           
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer

|Date:July 29, 2005 |  | /s/ DENNIS J. STEVERMER
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                   |  | Dennis J. Stevermer    
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
| **Ruby Tuesday, Inc. & Subsidiaries** |   |                                  |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                                      |   |                                  |
|                                      |   |                                  |
| **SUBSIDIARIES/AFFILIATES**               |
| Quality Outdoor Services, Inc.            |   | RT Distributing, LLC                  |
| RT Airport, Inc.                          |   | RT South Florida Franchise, LP        |
| RT Franchise Acquisition, LLC             |   | Ruby Tuesday GC Cards, Inc.           |
| RT Louisville Franchise, LLC              |   | RT West Palm Beach Franchise, LP      |
| RT McGhee Tyson, LLC                      |   | RT Detroit Franchise, LLC             |
| RT One Percent Holdings, Inc.             |   | RT Michigan Franchise, LLC            |
| Ruby Tuesday, LLC                         |   | RT O'Toole, LLC                       |
| RT One Percent Holdings, LLC              |   | RT Smith, LLC                         |
| RT Minneapolis Holdings, LLC              |   | RT Millington, LLC                    |
| RT Omaha Holdings, LLC                    |   | 4721 RT of Pennsylvania, Inc.         |
| RT Denver, Inc.                           |   | RT of Annapolis, Inc.                 |
| RT Louisville, Inc.                       |   | Ruby Tuesday of Marley Station, Inc.  |
| RT Orlando, Inc.                          |   | Orpah,Inc.                            |
| RT South Florida, Inc.                    |   | RT Hospitality - York, JV             |
| RT Tampa, Inc                             |   | Ruby Tuesday of St. Mary's, Inc.      |
| RT West Palm Beach, Inc.                  |   | Ruby Tuesday of Allegany County, Inc. |
| RTBD, Inc.                                |   | Ruby Tuesday of Columbia, Inc.        |
| RT Kentucky Restaurant Holdings, LLC      |   | Ruby Tuesday of Salisbury, Inc.       |
| RT New Hampshire Restaurant Holdings, LLC |   | Ruby Tuesday Sunday Club, Inc.        |
| RTGC, LLC                                 |   | Ruby Tuesday of Linthicum, Inc.       |
| RT Restaurant Services, LLC               |   | Ruby Tuesday of Frederick, Inc.       |
| RT Finance, Inc.                          |   | RT of Cecil County, Inc.              |
| RT Florida Equity, LLC                    |   | RT of Clarksville, Inc.               |
| RT Southwest Franchise, LLC               |   | RT of Riverside, Inc.                 |
| RT Tampa Franchise, LP                    |   | Ruby Tuesday of Pocomoke City, Inc.   |
| RT New York Franchise, LLC                |   | RT of Fruitland, Inc.                 |
| RT Northern California Franchise, LLC     |   | RTMB Lodging Joint Venture            |
| RTTA, LP                                  |   | RT Stonebridge Joint Venture          |
| RT Michiana Franchise, LLC                |   | RTT Texas, Inc.                       |
| RT Orlando Franchise, LP                  |   | RTTT, LLC                             |
| Wok Hay 2, LLC                            |   | RT/Sayosha Chambersburg Joint Venture |
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.2


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors 
Nash Finch Company:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (no.
33-54487 and no. 33-64313) on Form S-8 of Nash Finch Company of our reports
dated March 3 ,1995, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Nash Finch
Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1994 and January 1, 1994 and the
related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows and the related consolidated financial statement schedule for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1994, which reports are
included or incorporated by reference in the December 31, 1995 annual report on
Form 10-K of Nash Finch Company.




Minneapolis, Minnesota                        KPMG Peat Marwick LLP 
March 27, 1996
Sub Working Group - U.S. Department of Commerce Internet of Things Advisory Board (IoTAB)– March 7th 2023 

Sub Working 

Group Outline 

on 

Smart Traffic 

and Transit 

Technologies

• Team Members:

• Nicole Coughlin

• Benson Chan

• Steve Griffith

• Kevin Kornegay

• Debbie Reynolds
Sub Working Group - U.S. Department of Commerce Internet of Things Advisory Board (IoTAB)– March 7th 2023 

Technology 

Overview

• Systems- security, 

intelligence, monitoring, 

management

• Hardware- traffic signals, 

cameras, sensors, off-road 

equipment, drones, EV 

charging equipment

• Software- route planning

• Connectivity- Cellular 

Vehicle to Everything (C- V2X), 5G

• Edge Computing- Artificial 

Intelligence
Sub Working Group - U.S. Department of Commerce Internet of Things Advisory Board (IoTAB)– March 7th 2023 

Opportunities 

and Benefits

• Safety Applications

• Congestion 

mitigation/environmental

• Commerce/trade

• Support Functions- food and 

medicine delivery
Sub Working Group - U.S. Department of Commerce Internet of Things Advisory Board (IoTAB)– March 7th 2023 

Barriers

• Policy/regulations

• Accessibility/inclusion

• Education/training and 

resources

• Interoperability

• Cybersecurity

• Funding
Sub Working Group - U.S. Department of Commerce Internet of Things Advisory Board (IoTAB)– March 7th 2023 

Industry

Experts

• Selected State DOTs

• Vison Zero Network

• Highway Engineering 

Exchange Program

• Smart Cities Experts

• Research firm that talks 

about grid impacts 

associated with increased 

Electric Vehicles

• Security risks associated 

with transportation
Sub Working Group - U.S. Department of Commerce Internet of Things Advisory Board (IoTAB)– March 7th 2023 

Other 

references

• Federal Agencies (NHTSA, 

US DOT)

• State and local jurisdictions

• Smart City examples

• Studies on the growth of the 

EV market
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME OF MONSANTO COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND THE STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
POSITION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997. SUCH INFORMATION IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             134
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,823<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,374
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,266
<PP&E>                                           4,701
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,301
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,774
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,539
<BONDS>                                          1,979
<COMMON>                                         1,644
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,460
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,774
<SALES>                                          7,514
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,514
<CGS>                                            3,091
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    366
<INCOME-TAX>                                        72
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                294
<DISCONTINUED>                                     176
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       470
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.77
<FN>
<F1>Reported net of allowances of $63
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                5
<CIK>                           0000840401
<NAME>                         ACCUHEALTH, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                             1
<CURRENCY>                             USD
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                                        205,475
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               7,083,347
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (999,674)
<INVENTORY>                                   933,107
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            7,355,248
<PP&E>                                      4,455,759
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,779,823)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             10,701,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       8,056,186
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                    13,500
<COMMON>                                       21,332
<OTHER-SE>                                  7,108,408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               10,701,879
<SALES>                                     4,476,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            4,476,939
<CGS>                                       2,515,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               2,515,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            1,788,075
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            146,373
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                26,863
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            26,863
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   26,863
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        

</TABLE>