alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Community Resilience Workshop - Data Needs for Resilience Planning and Decision-Making

NIST and the Center for Risk-Based Community Resilience Planning 

Agenda 

Hilton Washington DC/Rockville Hotel & Executive Meeting Ctr. 

1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852 

www.HiltonRockville.com

October 25-26, 2018 

Thursday October 25, 2018 

8:00-8:30 Registration 

8:30-9:00 Welcome & Introduction 

9:00-9:30 Keynote Speaker 

Sandi Fowler, City of Cedar Rapids, IA, Assistant City Manager 

Cedar Rapids: Data and Tools Used in Planning and Carrying Out a Successful 

Resilience Strategy

9:30-10:25 Session 1:How CommunitiesCharacterize Themselves, SetGoals, & Make 

Decisions 

Arrietta Chakos, Urban Resilience Strategies, Berkeley, CA 

Sean McGlynn, Santa Rosa, CA, City Manager 

Janet Zeis, Chester County, PA, Community Resilience Coordinator 

Discussion of the data, information, and tools needed by communities to characterize 

themselves, set long-term goals, and make decisions. 

10:25-10:40 Break 

10:40-12:30 Breakout Session 1 

Concurrent facilitated sessions 

12:30-1:45 Lunch on your own 

1:45-2:30 Session 2:The Gap BetweenCurrentand Desired Performance of the Community’s 

Built Environment

Ed Fratto, Northeast States Emergency Consortium 

Jay Wilson, Clackamas County, OR, Emergency Manager 

Discussion of data, information, and tools needed by communities to determine 

performance gaps of the built environment. 

2:30-2:45 Break 

2:45-4:30 Breakout Session 2 
Community Resilience Workshop - Data Needs for Resilience Planning and Decision-Making

Concurrent facilitated sessions

4:30-5:00 Day One Wrap-Up

Friday October 26, 2018

8:30-8:45 Opening and Framing Remarks

8:45-9:45 Session 3: Community Resilience Priorities and Solutions

Jane Cage, InsightFive, Joplin, MO, Citizens Advisory Recovery Team

Scott Davis, SGD Urban Solutions, Washington, DC

Josh Ghaf ari, Washington, DC, Comprehensive Plan Manager

Gerry Horak, Fort Collins, CO, Mayor Pro Tem

Discussion of the data, information, and tools used by communities to prioritize their

performance gaps and select solutions to close those gaps.

9:45-10:00 Break

10:00-11:45 Breakout Session 3

Concurrent facilitated sessions

11:45-1:00 Workshop Summary Panel Session, Audience Comments, and Path Forward
Understanding and Rewiring Epidemic Networks: A Data-driven 

Approach Towards Enabling Quarantine in-Motion 

Radu Marculescu

Professor of ECE 

The University of Texas at Austin 
Testing the ability to use GPS data to sense, track, and mitigate an infectious 

disease

COVID-19: From social sensing to contact tracing and to 

contact rewiring

Monitor Sense Track Rewire
Multiscale approach to rewire contact networks 
‘Always on’ approach as a closed control loop

Contact Tracing

Remote Health Sensing

Risk Assessment

Density Hotspot

Time = t 

Individual 

Trajectory 

Adjustment

Individual trajectory

prediction

Time = t + delta
Dynamic contact networks from real GPS data in Austin, TX
Monitoring interactions between people reveals 

multiscale temporal nuances

Monitor
Remote health sensing through mobility

Sense
Susceptible

Incubating

Recovered

Asymptomatic Symptomatic

Contagious

Transmission

Undetected

How can we predict when secondary transmission occurs before primary contact is 

confirmed to be sick?

Simulated Reality

(SICAURS)

COVID-19 transmission outruns human contact tracers due 

to the scope of the undetected transmission

Track
Time

Susceptible

Incubating

Contagious

Asymptomatic

Symptomatic

Removed

No Risk

Likely exposed

Likely contagious

Confirmed infected

Time

False alarm

False alarm

Real alarm

Building a risk model that upgrades aggressively and 

downgrades when safe 

Risk 

Assess
• GPS data allow us to investigate large-scale human mobility

• SLD@UT Austin aims to discover how modern mobility can grow resilient to 

infectious disease 

Quarantine in Motion: 

A new paradigm for the 21st century 

Enter your desired location Checking risk level . . . 

Hotspot detected 

at your destination

Comparable destination found
Thank you!

Ongoing research at UT Austin by Sofia Hurtado in the 

Systems Level Design Group (SLD) in collaboration with 

Drs. Ravi Srinivasan (Dept. of Statistics) and Justin 

Drake (Texas Advanced Computing Center)
11197.

#### Floyd *v.*Kaminsky *et al.*

Decided August 13, 1920.

Trover; from city court of Savannah. — Judge Freeman. October 28, 1919.

*Gignilliat & O’Neal, J. S. Harrison, M. H. Bernstein,*for plaintiff in error.

*O’Neal & Kravitch,*contra.

Stephens, J.

1. This being a suit in trover to recover an automobile the title to which is admittedly in the plaintiff, and the only issue being whether or not the demand made upon the defendant had been properly and timely made, a verdict for the plaintiff is supported by the evidence, from which it is reasonably inferable, although not positively appearing in express language, that the demand was properly and timely made.

2. The motion for new. trial contains only the general grounds. The verdict being supported by the law and the evidence and having the approval of the trial judge, will not be disturbed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*
**EXHIBIT32.2***

 

SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of California Coastal Communities, Inc. (the  “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period endedJune 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Sandra G. Sciutto, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. 1350 has been provided toCalifornia Coastal Communities, Inc. and will be retained by California CoastalCommunities, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated:   August 3, 2004 |  /s/ Sandra G. Sciutto |   |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                         | Sandra G. Sciutto           |
|                         | Chief Financial Officer     |

 

 

----

*In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), the abovecertification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to theliability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated byreference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that theCompany explicitly incorporates it by reference in any such filing.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 480 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.480

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 747 Broadway in Albany, New York, as the ``United States Postal 
                     Service Henry Johnson Annex''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 747 
Broadway in Albany, New York, and known as the United States Postal 
Service Carrier Annex, shall be known and designated as the ``United 
States Postal Service Henry Johnson Annex''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``United States Postal Service 
Henry Johnson Annex''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### Morris *v.*The State.

Gilbert, J.

George Morris was indicted for the offense of murder. On the trial a verdict of guilty, with recommendation of mercy, was returned. A motion for new trial, based upon the general grounds, was filed, and was subsequently amended by the addition of three grounds. The first of these was based upon newly discovered evidence tending to establish the defense of alibi, which had been set up on the trial. The second merely tended to contradict evidence of a witness sworn on the trial in behalf of the State. The third attacked the qualification of a juror who participated in the trial of the case, on the ground of prejudice and bias. The movant complied with the statute in attaching the affidavits of movant and his counsel, to the effect that they did not know of the evidence before the conclusion of the trial, and could not have discovered it by the exercise of due diligence. There were also affidavits tending to show the credibility of the affiants who made affidavits as to newly discovered evidence. The State filed a counter- affidavit of the juror attacked, in -which he expressly denied making the statement charged to him, or that he knew the persons making the charge, or that he had ever at any time discussed the case with either of them. The court overruled the motion, and the exception is to that judgment. *Tí eld:*

1. The verdict is supported by evidence.

2. The newly discovered evidence, as to the merits of the case, is cumulative and impeaching. The judgment refusing a new trial on these grounds will therefore not be reversed.

*287No. 6747.

November 14, 1928.

*Lankford, Rogers & Newion, Corbitt & .Pope,*and *Wimberly E. Brown,*for plaintiff in error.

*George M. Napier, attorney-general, A. S. Bradley, solicitor-general,*and *T. R. Gress, assistant attorney-general,*contra.

3. “In passing upon a ground of a motion for a new trial based upon alleged expressions of opinion of jurors before the trial as to the guilt of the accused, the trial judge occupies the place of a trior, and his finding that the jurors were competent will .not be reversed unless under all the facts tile discretion of the judge was manifestly abused.” *Hall*v. *State,*124 *Ga.*649 (52 S. E. 891); *Hall*v. *State,*141 *Ga.*7 (80 S. E. 307);*McKie*v. *State,*165 *Ga.*210 (10) (140 S. E. 625).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANTHONY GIOVANI ORELLANA , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 451

[ March 3, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Robert E. Belanger , Judge; L.T. Case No. 562017CF003275A

. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuña, Assistan t Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

G ERBER , J

. The defendant, whom a predecessor judge had sentenced as a youthful offender to community control and who later committed non

criminal violations of that community control, appeals from the

su ccessor judge’s revocation of his community control and imposition of a six

- year prison sentence. The defendant argues the successor judge: (1) failed to recognize during the sentencing hearing on the community control violations that the defendant had o riginally been sentenced as a youthful offender and had committed only non

- criminal violations, thereby limiting the successor judge’s sentencing discretion to a maximum six

- year prison sentence; and (2) failed to award the defendant with a proper jail cre dit amount

. On the first argument, we affirm. Contrary to the defendant’s argument, t he record does not show the successor judge believed he had no discretion but to sentence the defendant according to the fifteen

- year maximum for each second

- degree felony offense or that he had a desire to sentence the defendant to an incarcerative period less than the six2 years’ imprisonment imposed. Further, the successor judge, in his order denying the defendant’s motion to correct sentencing error, insisted he was aware of his sentencing discretion under the Youthful Offender Act’s six

- year incarcerat ion limitation.

On the second argument, t he state properly concedes the successor judge erred in denying the defendant’s motion to correct sentence to award the correct amount of jail time credit of 82 days to 103 days
, because the record does not show th e defendant waived his entitlement to the correct amount of jail time credit.

Based on the foregoing, we affirm the defendant’s sentence but remand for the circuit court to amend the judgment by award ing the defendant with the corrected jail credit of 103 days. The defendant need not be present for this ministerial correction.

Sentence affirmed; remanded for correction of jail credit

.

F ORST and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT (gg)

                       RENEWAL AND EXTENSION AGREEMENT

     This Renewal and Extension Agreement ("Agreement") is dated effective
as of January 2, 1998, by and between RadioSunGroup of Texas, Inc.
("Borrower") and Kenneth R. Reynolds, ("Lender").

                              W I T NE S S E T H

     WHEREAS, the Borrower executed and delivered that certain Promissory Note
dated October 31, 1985 (the "Note") in the original principal amount of
$212,577.00 bearing interest at the rate stated therein: and

     WHEREAS, the Note is secured by various real and personal property; and

     WHEREAS, the Borrower and Lender have agreed to extend the final maturity
of the Note to March 31, 1998;

     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the Borrower and Lender hereby agree as
follows:

     1.     The Note, including all principal then unpaid shall be due and
payable on June 30, 1998.

     2.     The interest rate charged on the Note is hereby changed to equal
the fixed rate of interest of ten percent (10%) per annum.  Accrued interest
shall be due and payable on January 31, 1998 and on the final day of each
successive calendar month thereafter.  Provided, however, on June 30, 1998,
all principal and interest then unpaid shall be finally due and payable.

     3.     Privilege is reserved to prepay this Note at any time.  Provided,
however, if this Note is prepaid, regardless of the date of prepayment, such
prepayment shall be accompanied by such additional sums as may be required to
ensure that Holder receives a full six months interest on this Note.  For
example, if this Note is prepaid on February 1, 1998 (and assuming the regular
interest payment was made as scheduled on January 31, 1998), the prepayment
shall be accompanied by an additional five months of interest as if the Note
were paid in full on its maturity date of June 30, 1998.

     4.     All liens presently securing the Note are hereby ratified and
confirmed as continuing to secure the payment of the Note.  Nothing herein
shall in any manner diminish, impair or extinguish the Note of the lien
securing the Note.

     5.     Borrower and Lender hereby agree that the present unpaid balance
under the Note is $32,800.00 as of the date of this Agreement.

     6.     The Lender represents and warrants to Borrower that he is the
lawful owner and holder of the Note and that Lender has full power and
authority to enter into this Agreement.

     EXECUTED, the date written above.

                                   RadioSunGroup of Texas, Inc.
                                   By: /s/ John W. Biddinger
                                   President
                                   and
                                   By: /s/ Kenneth R. Reynolds

                                      89
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                                                 
                 Exhibit 27.1 Article 5 Financial Data Schedule

This schedule contains summary financial  information  extracted from the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the nine months ended January 31, 1998 and the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1,000
<S>                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                        FEB-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                         APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                                    12,217
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              8,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          12,402
<PP&E>                                                       889
<DEPRECIATION>                                              (707)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            21,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      2,540
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                     (14)
<OTHER-SE>                                               (43,297)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             (21,535)
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             153
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           2,465
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (2,312)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (2,312)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (2,312)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (0.16)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
                        RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, 
                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
                        SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alexander Y. Tokman, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A  for the period ended
December 31, 2008 of Microvision, Inc.; and

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.

Date: April 30, 2009

| |  | /s/ALEXANDER Y. TOKMAN
    Alexander Y. Tokman
    Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
11490.

#### Duggar *et al. v.*The State.

Decided June 15, 1920.

Indictment for manufacture of liquor; from Murray superior court — Judge Tarver. March 13, 1930.

*H. H. Anderson,*for plaintiffs in error.

*J. M. Lang, solicitor-general,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

The excerpt from the charge of the court complained of, when considered in connection with the. entire charge, contains no harmful error, and the verdict was amply authorized by the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
Comments from Rick Lane sent via email on Jan. 11, 2023 sent to the IoT Advisory Board

I am looking forward to the NIST IoT advisory board's first meeting. It is being led by 

Dan Caprio, one of the brightest minds in this space.

I was disappointed that no one from the child safety community was selected to be on 

this important advisory board. One critical issue that was absent in the advisory board's 

charter (and not mentioned in any of the background info), and needs to be covered 

explicitly in the final report, is the impact of IoT on children and teens. We all have 

learned that with all the good that technology and its broad adoption has brought to 

society, whether intended or not, technology has also harmed our kids. As the advisory 

board begins its discussions, the impact of IoT on children and teens must be one of the 

priority topics.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CLARA CUNNINGHAM KING, :

 :

Plaintiff, :

 :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0217-M

 :

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, :

Commissioner of :

Social Security, :

 :

Defendant. :

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff's

Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice

Act be GRANTED and that Plaintiff's attorney, Margaret A. Stone,

be AWARDED an EAJA attorney's fee in the amount of $2,004.79. No

costs are taxed.

DONE this 26th day of March, 2010.

s/BERT W. MILLING, JR. 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE IN THE

Case 1:09-cv-00217-M Document 30 Filed 03/26/10 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER LENARD PUGH, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTON NO. 09-0507-WS-N

)

WARDEN KENNETH JONES, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the action be dismissed without

prejudice and that judgment be entered in favor of the Respondent in the above-styled action. A

Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. No costs are taxed.

DONE this 1st day of April, 2010.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00507-WS-N Document 27 Filed 04/01/10 Page 1 of 1