alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 24.1****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     The undersigned, a director of Nash-Finch Company (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation,does hereby constitute and appoint LeAnne M. Stewart and Kathleen M. Mahoney, and each of them, asthe undersigned’s true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power to each of them to act withoutthe others, for and in the name of the undersigned to sign the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005 (“Annual Report”), and to file said Annual Report sosigned with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and hereby grants to the attorneys-in-fact, and eachof them, full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things necessary to bedone in the exercise of the rights and powers granted herein as fully and to all intents andpurposes as the undersigned might or could do in person; and hereby ratifies and confirms all thatsuch attorneys-in-fact, or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.     In Witness Whereof, I have signed this Power of Attorney as of February 24, 2006.   /s/ Robert L. Bagsby /s/ John H. Grunewald   Robert L. Bagsby John H. Grunewald   /s/ Carole F. Bitter /s/ Douglas A. Hacker   Carole F. Bitter Douglas A. Hacker   /s/Richard A. Fisher /s/ William R. Voss   RichardA. Fisher William R. Voss   /s/ Jerry L. Ford /s/ William H. Weintraub   Jerry L. Ford William H. Weintraub   /s/ Mickey P. Foret     Mickey P. Foret
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BENJAMIN CHARLES BOONE )

BOP Reg. # #09206-003, )

 Petitioner, ) 

) CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-00547-WS

v. )

 )CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 05-00265-WS-N-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

 Respondent. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having 

been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 791 ) of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Rule 8(b) of the Rules 

Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts, and S.D. 

Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(R), and dated October 14, 2016, is ADOPTED as the opinion of 

this Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner Benjamin Charles Boone’s 

“Motion to Amend Previous Motion pursuant to 28 USC 2255” (Doc. 74), construed as 

an unauthorized second or successive § 2255 motion, is DISMISSED for lack of 

jurisdiction. Further, the Court certifies that any appeal by Boone of the dismissal of 

his second or successive § 2255 motion would be without merit and therefore not taken 

in good faith. Thus, he is not entitled proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

DONE and ORDERED this the 14th day of November 2016.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 1 All “Doc.” citations herein refer to the docket of the above-styled criminal action.

Case 1:05-cr-00265-WS-N Document 81 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I, Kim McClaran, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Redwood Empire Bancorp;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:                a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;                b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and                c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):                a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and                b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date:  November 2, 2004

By:  /s/ Kim C. McClaran       Kim C. McClaran       Chief Financial Officer
From: Altaz Valani <avalani@securitycompass.com>

Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 3:49 PM

To: privacyframework <privacyframework@nist.gov>

Subject: NIST Privacy Framework: Preliminary Draft Comments

Hi,

For the current working draft, I would like to propose some comments for your consideration:

Figure 6:

- The diagram seems to imply a hierarchy. This does not promote cross-functional risk

management. In fact, the diagram should indicate bi-directional communication across the

layers with the mid layer explicitly being the policy to procedure glue that binds the Executives

and Implementation teams.

- Governance of privacy should minimally include privacy, risk, legal, and IT teams. This is not

clear in the diagram.

- It largely describes privacy governance. The cybersecurity governance layers should also be

included at the mid and bottom layers. A suggestion for the mid layer could be: translate risk

based security policies into technical requirements. A suggestion for the bottom layer could be:

configure, develop, and test for security.

Table 2 - COMMUNICATE-P:

- In CM.PP-P1, there should be a clear and traceable way of deriving the privacy gaps of the

organization based on process governance.

Thanks,

Altaz

Altaz Valani

Director of Research

Security Compass

p: +1 (888) 777-2211 x237

t: @altazvalani
<PAGE> 1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                           CONSENT OF COMPANY COUNSEL

    I hereby consent to the reference to Company counsel in the ``Commitments
and Contingencies'' note to the financial statements in the Company's 1995
Annual Report to shareowners and incorporated in the Company's Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-36636, 2-76696, 2-90152, 33-13197, 33-21030,
33-39704, 33-39705, 33-39706, 33-39707, 33-49717, 33-53363, 33-53365 and
33-53367) and on Form S-3 (No. 33-60189). In giving this consent I do not
thereby admit that I am within the category of persons whose consent is
required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.

                                    KARL R. BARNICKOL
                                    KARL R. BARNICKOL
                                    Associate General Counsel
                                    Monsanto Company

Saint Louis, Missouri

March 15, 1996

                                       23
JOSEPH PIOTROWSKI

,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSIT ION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 4115

Opinion filed February 6, 2015.

Certiorari

– Original Jurisdiction.

Joseph Piotrowski

, pro se, Petitioner.

Lisa Martin, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

.

DENIED.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
Aphton Corporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James F. Smith, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 23, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    JAMES F. SMITH
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | James F. Smith                                   
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
3(b)(3)






	BYLAWS

	OF

	THE MONTANA POWER COMPANY







Adopted on		:	August 22, 1995
As Amended on	:	December 9, 1997, August 27, 1996 & May 12, 1997



THE MONTANA POWER COMPANY

AMENDED BYLAWS


Article	Amendment	Date of Amendment



11	The affairs of the Corporation shall be managed by 	December 9, 1997
	a Board of thirteen (13) Directors.  



	THE MONTANA POWER COMPANY
	CERTIFICATION OF RESOLUTION
	I, R. M. Ralph, Assistant Secretary of The Montana Power Company, a 
corporation, hereby certify that the following is a full, true and correct 
copy of Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of The Montana 
Power Company at a meeting duly called and held December 9, 1997 and that 
said Resolution is in full force and effect as of the date of this 
certificate.

RESOLVED, that the first sentence of Section 11 of The Montana 
Power Company Bylaws is hereby amended to reduce the number of Directors 
from fourteen (14) to thirteen (13) as follows:

	SECTION 11. The affairs of the Corporation shall be managed 
by a Board of thirteen (13) Directors.

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the Seal of said 
Corporation this 10th day of December 1997.  



					/s/R. M. Ralph
					R. M. Ralph, Assistant Secretary




(SEAL)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01
                                                                   -------------



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 2-88669, No. 33-13995, No. 33-67940, No. 33-72438
and No. 333-06025) of Nashua Corporation of our report dated February 4, 1998,
except as to the Business Changes Note which is as of March 10, 1998, appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears in
this Form 10-K.






Price Waterhouse LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 24, 1998
































                                      -18-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,606,910
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  324,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    187,817
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,294,692
<PP&E>                                       8,888,322
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,695,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,390,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,707,667
<BONDS>                                      3,327,032
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,771,275
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,463,761)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,390,460
<SALES>                                     13,251,882
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,251,882
<CGS>                                        1,324,339
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,097,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,795,517
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             151,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,291)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,291)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,291)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

HUNTER TODD, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0746-WS-N

ALABAMA POWER, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to

the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is

ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby

DISMISSED without prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 

DONE this 1st day of March, 2010.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00746-WS-N Document 18 Filed 03/01/10 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 144 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 144

To amend the provisions of title 40, United States Code, commonly known 
    as the Davis-Bacon Act, to raise the threshold dollar amount of 
     contracts subject to the prevailing wage requirements of such 
                              provisions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

  Mr. Duncan (for himself and Mr. Sessions) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the provisions of title 40, United States Code, commonly known 
    as the Davis-Bacon Act, to raise the threshold dollar amount of 
     contracts subject to the prevailing wage requirements of such 
                              provisions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Adjusting Davis-Bacon for Inflation 
Act''.

SEC. 2. THRESHOLD OF CONTRACTS SUBJECT TO DAVIS-BACON.

    Section 3142(a) of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code is 
amended by striking ``$2,000'' and inserting ``$50,000''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.4



 EXHIBIT 10.4 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 

SPONSORED RESEARCH AGREEMENT 
 This
Amendment No. 1 to Sponsored Research Agreement (“Amendment No. 1”) is entered into and made effective as of April 1, 2015 (“Amendment No. 1 Effective Date”) by and between Juno Therapeutics,
Inc. (“Juno”) a Delaware corporation and Seattle Children’s Hospital d/b/a Seattle Children’s Research Institute (“Seattle Children’s”), a Washington nonprofit corporation. 

WHEREAS, Juno and Seattle Children’s have previously entered into a Sponsored Research Agreement dated February 13, 2014 (“Original
SRA”); and 
 WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Original SRA under the terms and conditions herein. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual promises set forth in this Amendment No. 1, and other good and valuable consideration, the
exchange, receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, Seattle Children’s and Juno hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Survival of Agreement
Terms. Except as expressly provided for herein below, all terms and conditions of the Original SRA remain unchanged and in full force and effect. In the event of any conflict between the terms and conditions of this Amendment No. 1 and the
Original SRA, the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment No. 1 shall control with respect to the subject matter hereof. 
 2.
Section 10(a). In Section 10(a) of the Original SRA, the phrase “expire on the fifth (5th) anniversary of the Effective Date” is hereby deleted and replaced with “expire on April 30, 2020”. 

3. Miscellaneous. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original and all which
together will constitute one and the same Amendment No. 1. This Amendment No. 1 may not be altered, amended or modified in any way except by a writing (excluding email or similar electronic transmissions) signed by the authorized
representatives of both parties. This Amendment No. 1 will be governed by, interpret and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington, without regard to conflicts of laws. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this amendment to be executed by their respective duly authorized representatives as of the Amendment
No. 1 Effective Date. 
  

									
	JUNO THERAPEUTICS, INC.				 SEATTLE CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL D/B/A

SEATTLE CHILDREN’S RESEARCH INSTITUTE

					
	By:		/s/ Andy Walker				By:		/s/ James B. Hendricks, PhD
	Name:		Andy Walker				Name:		James B. Hendricks, PhD
	Title:		SVP, Manufacturing & Operations				Title:		President, Research Institute
	Date:		March 20, 2015				Date:		March 19, 2015


  
 Page 1 of 1
United States Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

New Mexico

2022 to 2023

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international 

system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented 

measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, and 

has demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope

Mass Echelon I

20 kg to 1 mg

Mass Echelon II

30 kg to 1 mg

50 lb to 0.5 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Mass Echelon III

500 kg to 1 mg

5000 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

500 gr to 200 gr

10 N to 1 N

Weight Carts 

5000 lb to 1000 lb

Volume Gravimetric, I

3 L to 1 L

5 gal to 2 fl oz

Volume Transfer, II

20 L 

500 gal to 1 gal

Volume Transfer, II LPG

100 gal to 25 gal

_____________________________________

Katrice Lippa, Chief

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

(Rev.: September 2021)

Effective Dates: 2022-02-01 to 2024-02-01
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             36,997
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                  0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   55,655
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                        0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       135,340
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             46,572
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               45,297
<LOANS>                                           838,585
<ALLOWANCE>                                        13,883
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,140,180
<DEPOSITS>                                        614,308
<SHORT-TERM>                                      173,780
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                22,719
<LONG-TERM>                                       176,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           11,077
<OTHER-SE>                                        140,872
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  1,140,180
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    76,779
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  10,926
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                      691
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   88,396
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 17,043
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 39,019
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              49,377
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       3,480
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                      0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    29,091
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    27,503
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         27,503
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       16,627
<EPS-BASIC>                                          1.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1.90
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       5.01
<LOANS-NON>                                         1,638
<LOANS-PAST>                                            0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                      221
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    33,569
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   13,785
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       3,560
<RECOVERIES>                                          178
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  13,883
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               11,729
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             2,154



</TABLE>