alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                               5
<CIK>                                          0000840401
<NAME>                                        ACCUHEALTH, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                            1
<CURRENCY>                                            USD
       
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                            143,033
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   7,467,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (960,995)
<INVENTORY>                                       770,854
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                7,504,232
<PP&E>                                          4,809,712
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,666,226)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,805,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           8,098,738
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                        13,500
<COMMON>                                           21,332
<OTHER-SE>                                      7,108,408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,805,310
<SALES>                                         4,598,343
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4,598,343
<CGS>                                           2,493,294
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,493,294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,852,435
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                137,568
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   115,046
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               115,046
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      115,046
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .04
        

</TABLE>
APPROVAL OF 

QUALITY MANAGEMENT

SYSTEM 

APROBACIÓN DEL SISTEMA DE

GESTIÓN DE LA CALIDAD 

National Institute of Standards and Technology – The United States of 

America 

Proficiency Testing for Lighting 

The Quality Management System supporting measurement 

services, as defined in a motion of the Quality System Task 

Force (QSTF), has been reviewed and found to be in 

conformance with the requirements of ISO/IEC 17043:2010 

and ISO/IEC 17025:2017, under the mandate of the InterAmerican Metrology System in support of the expectations of 

the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement. 

El Sistema de Gestión de Calidad en que se apoyan los servicios

de medición, según se define en una moción del Grupo de

Trabajo del Sistema de Calidad (QSTF), ha sido revisado y se

ha determinado que cumple con los requisitos de ISO/IEC

17043:2010 y ISO/IEC 17025:2017, bajo mandato del Sistema 

Interamericano de Metrología en apoyo de las expectativas del

Acuerdo de Reconocimiento Mutuo del CIPM.

Approval date: 24 September 2019

Expiration date: 24 September 2024

Georgette Macdonald, Quality System Task Force Chair

Claire Saundry, President, SIM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,019
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             345
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    135,638
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         191,285
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           193,846
<LOANS>                                        298,774
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,281
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 667,423
<DEPOSITS>                                     511,220
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,561
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,579
<LONG-TERM>                                    106,618
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           789
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,657
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 667,423
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,084
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,663
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,748
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,620
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,290
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,458
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,224
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,174
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,389
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,389
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.41
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,607
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   575
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,138
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       38
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,281
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,281
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,024
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RAUL SANCHEZ VALENCIA,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00050-CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 4

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20150C05658)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until September 3, 2017. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Louis Elias Lopez, the Appellant’s attorney, 

prepare the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before September 3, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2

nd day of August, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1502 

To amend title V of the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize 

comprehensive opioid recovery centers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2023 

Mr. GUTHRIE (for himself, Mr. PETERS, Mr. BUCSHON, and Mr. TONKO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title V of the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize comprehensive opioid recovery centers, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Comprehensive Opioid 

5 Recovery Centers Reauthorization Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COMPREHENSIVE OPIOID RECOVERY CENTERS. 

7 (a) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 552(j) of the Public 

8 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 290ee–7(j)) is amended by 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1502 IH

1 striking ‘‘2019 through 2023’’ and inserting ‘‘2024 

2 through 2028’’. 

3 (b) DOCUMENTATION FOR EVIDENCE OF CAPACITY

4 TO CARRY OUT REQUIRED ACTIVITIES.—Section 552(d) 

5 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 290ee–7(d)) 

6 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(3) DOCUMENTATION.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Evidence required to 

9 be provided under paragraph (1) may be pro10 vided through a letter of intent from partner 

11 agencies or other relevant documentation (as 

12 defined by the Secretary). 

13 ‘‘(B) PARTNER AGENCY DEFINED.—In this 

14 paragraph, the term ‘partner agency’ means a 

15 non-governmental organization or other public 

16 or private entity— 

17 ‘‘(i) the primary purpose of which is 

18 the delivery of mental health or substance 

19 use disorder treatment services; and 

20 ‘‘(ii) with which the applicant coordi21 nates to provide the full continuum of 

22 treatment services (as specified in sub23 section (g)(1)(B)) that the applicant is un24 able to offer on site.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1502 IH

1 (c) CENTER ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT THROUGH

2 THIRD PARTIES.—Section 552(g) of the Public Health 

3 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 290ee–7(g)) is amended in the 

4 matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘Each Center 

5 shall’’ and all that follows through ‘‘subsection (f):’’ and 

6 inserting the following: ‘‘Each Center shall, at a minimum, 

7 carry out the activities specified in this subsection directly, 

8 through referral, or through contractual arrangements. If 

9 a Center elects to carry out such activities through con10 tractual arrangements, the Secretary may issue guidance 

11 on best practices to ensure that the Center is capable of 

12 carrying out such activities, including carrying out such 

13 activities through technology-enabled collaborative learn14 ing and capacity building models described in subsection 

15 (f) and coordinating the full continuum of treatment serv16 ices specified in subparagraph (B). Such activities include 

17 the following:’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,690,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,970,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,152,000
<PP&E>                                       7,480,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,631,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,136,000
<BONDS>                                     14,835,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       113,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,474,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,631,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,939,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,810,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,791,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,774,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   387,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,387,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                143,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,530,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

vs. ) CRIMINAL ACTION 09-00143-KD-B 

 ) 

THOMAS EDWARD TAYLOR, ) 

Defendant. ) 

 ORDER 

This matter is before the Court on the Defendant=s Motion to Correct Clerical Error. 

(Doc. 24). Specifically, the Defendant requests the Court correct “the clerical error reflected in 

his Presentence Report adopted by this Court and used to determine [his] sentence[.]” (Id. at 3). 

Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides that “[a]fter giving any 

notice it considers appropriate, the court may at any time correct a clerical error in a judgment, 

order, or other part of the record, or correct an error in the record arising from oversight or 

omission.” A review of the Defendant’s motion reveals that it is not one to simply correct a 

clerical error. Rather, the Defendant’s motion raises only a substantive challenge to his 

sentence and does not point to any clerical error with respect to his sentence. See, e.g., U.S. v. 

Parson, Slip Copy, 2012 WL 1521824, *1 (11th Cir. May 2, 2012). Accordingly, upon 

consideration, it is ORDERED that Defendant Taylor’s Motion to Correct Clerical Error (Doc. 

24) is DENIED. 

DONE and ORDERED this the 25th day of June 2012.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:09-cr-00143-KD-B Document 25 Filed 06/26/12 Page 1 of 1
| 1.   | The              Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or              15(d)              of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The              information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the              Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                April                27, 2007 | /s/                Joseph D. Reid                   Joseph                D. ReidChief                Executive Officer |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Cite as 23 I&N Dec. 694 (A.G. 2005) Interim Decision #3504 

In re R-A-, Respondent 

Decided by Attorney General January 19, 2005 

Decided by Attorney General January 19, 20011 

Decided by Board June 11, 1999 

U.S. Department of Justice

Executive Office for Immigration Review 

Board of Immigration Appeals 

FOR APPLICANT: Jane B. Kroesche, Esquire, and Karen Musalo, Esquire, San Francisco, 

California 

FOR DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Joe D. Whitley, General Counsel 

BEFORE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

(January 19, 2005) 

The case is remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals for 

reconsideration following final publication of the proposed rule published at 

65 Fed. Reg. 76,588 (Dec. 7, 2000). The BIA should reconsider the decision 

in light of the final rule. 

1 The Attorney General’s January 19, 2001, and the Board’s June 11, 1999, decisions in this 

case were published as Matter of R-A-, 22 I&N Dec. 906 (A.G. 2001; BIA 1999). 

694
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CaliforniaCoastal Communities, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in their respectivecapacity as an officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of their respective knowledge, that:

 

·                  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

·                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Dated:  August 11, 2008                         |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                 |   |
| /s/ Raymond J.  Pacini                               |   |
| Raymond J.  Pacini                                   |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer                             |   |
|                                                 |   |
| /s/ Sandra G.  Sciutto                               |   |
| Sandra G.  Sciutto                                   |   |
| Senior Vice  President and   Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magnitude Information Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the
"Form 10-QSB"), I, Joerg H. Klaube, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge, that the Company's Form 10-QSB fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 12, 2005           /s/  Joerg H. Klaube
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                       Joerg H. Klaube, Chief Financial Officer
Pharmacophore Resources:

• T. Worst and J. Sprague; The "pharmacophore rule" and the "spices". Forensic Toxicology. 

33 (2015) 170-173.

• S. Yang; Pharmacophore modeling and applications in drug discovery: challenges and 

recent advances. Drug Discovery Today 15 (2010) 444-450.

• A. M. Jordan and S. D. Roughley; Drug discovery chemistry: a primer for the non-specialist.

Drug Discovery Today 14 (2009) 731-744.

• European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, “Synthetic cannabinoids in 

Europe (Perspectives on drugs)”, EMCDDA, Lisbon, June 2017

http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/pods/synthetic-cannabinoids_en

• Bowling Green State University Pharmacophore Learning Module (see Presentations

section)
<PAGE>


                                     [LETTERHEAD]


                             Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors
Nash Finch Company

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
33-54487 and 33-64313) on Form S-8 of Nash Finch Company of our reports dated
March 3, 1995, relating to the consolidated statements of earnings, 
stockholders' equity and cash flows of Nash Finch Company and subsidiaries 
and related consolidated financial statement schedule for the fiscal year 
ended December 31, 1994, which reports are included or incorporated by 
reference in the Decmeber 28, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of Nash 
Finch Company.

                                                       /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 28, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FIFNANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         204,086
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     (179,100)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,086
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,779
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,972
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,427)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,427)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,427)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
<FN>
<F1>REGISTRANT HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT L. JOHNSON, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION 05-0389-WS-D

 )

LEVAN THOMAS, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be and is hereby

DISMISSED without prejudice. 

DONE and ORDERED this 30th day of September, 2005.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00389-WS-D Document 10 Filed 09/30/05 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TONY LAMAR MAYE, *

 *

Plaintiff, *

 *

vs. * Civil Action No. 04-00781-BH-B

 *

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, *

Commissioner of * 

Social Security, *

 *

Defendant. *

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order entered on this date, it

is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the decision

of the Commissioner of Social Security, denying Plaintiff’s

claim for disability insurance and supplemental security

income benefits, be AFFIRMED.

DONE this 25th day of April, 2006.

 s/ W. B. Hand 

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-00781-BH-B Document 14 Filed 04/25/06 Page 1 of 1