alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Granite
Broadcasting Corporation form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,247,007
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               28,828,041
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,247,368
<PP&E>                                      34,543,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             771,259,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       41,359,181
<BONDS>                                    424,804,753
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      221,832,860
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       119,971
<OTHER-SE>                                (13,762,160)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               771,259,436
<SALES>                                     33,874,817
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,874,817
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,556,993
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,080,453
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,101,793
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,864,422)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (3,441,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,423,422)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.10)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-27-1998             MAR-06-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-28-1997             FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-27-1998             MAR-06-1999
<CASH>                                       2,818,071               1,664,398
<SECURITIES>                                   206,706                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,036,589              17,546,083
<ALLOWANCES>                                   106,000                 158,790
<INVENTORY>                                  7,361,347              30,430,482
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,307,895              54,786,925
<PP&E>                                      71,555,653             105,191,311
<DEPRECIATION>                              26,531,860              30,191,914
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              71,655,799             216,989,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,805,279              27,660,618
<BONDS>                                     13,623,532             146,265,928
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     5,898,449               5,807,049
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,328,539              35,344,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                71,655,799             216,989,023
<SALES>                                     66,245,345             156,841,831
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            66,245,345             156,841,831
<CGS>                                       59,153,475             101,413,313
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               68,869,906             142,420,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,614,823               4,901,356
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               260,735                 161,969
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,762,363              12,332,248
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,797,702)             (2,402,801)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,926,693                 612,885
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,871,009)             (1,789,916)
<DISCONTINUED>                               6,121,009               4,285,108
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                 (64,335)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,250,000               2,430,857
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .40                     .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40                     .41


</TABLE>
! " #$%&' !
!
(! )*"*" 


#(+,-,,-+,	+$,$#	,

.


//////////"//////////

#

"0
















$"
(1

#(1


*2 0
1


!
 "0

2 0
1

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

#30 .


 .

.
4 
 !"" .
  
#$

%&'
 .

003"0
03"
)"
 
*
"


.."

" )"
5 
*6)

*7

0


)6.
#

"

$00""3 " #$

%88 9."

" .09: .
3*6"
0
"
.#;%4


.
"

""
.#$%&''&9.

<
..
6
33*)*
9

IT IS ORDERED..
0"1

-(+- ;	(,-.


="3
 "*603"
"


03"0
(as reflected in 

the last judgment issued)  0."is reduced to 

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

-<
3".
7"
3
9**3"".
> 0

 ".**
0



IT IS SO ORDERED



1

Judge’s signature

-


1

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

 Southern District of Alabama

JIMMY RAY HERRON 09-00064-003

10639-003

09/21/2009

Pro Se

✔

✔

100 84 months

09/21/2009

January 20, 2015

November 1, 2015 United States District Judge

Callie V.S. Granade 

U.S. District Judge

Digitally signed by Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge 

DN: cn=Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge, o=U.S. 

Government, ou=Federal Judiciary, 

email=efile_granade@alsd.uscourts.gov, c=US 

Date: 2015.01.20 09:33:48 -06'00'

Case 1:09-cr-00064-CG-C Document 95 Filed 01/20/15 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

 ) 

 Respondent, ) 

 ) CRIMINAL NO. 08-0067-CG-N 

 ) 

 ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-0216-CG-N 

PAUL ANTONIO BURKE, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant/Petitioner, ) 

JUDGMENT 

 Pursuant to an order this day entered, it is hereby ORDERED, 

ADJUDGED and DECREED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. 

DONE and ORDERED this the 16th day of September, 2011. 

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Case 1:08-cr-00067-CG-N Document 114 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

BYRON A. YORK, : 

 : 

 Plaintiff, : 

 : 

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-0623-CG-M 

 : 

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, : 

Commissioner of Social Security, : 

 : 

 Defendant. : 

ORDER

 After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this file, and there having been no 

objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. 

 It is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to 

Justice Act be and is hereby GRANTED and that Plaintiff’s attorney, Byron A. Lassiter be and 

is hereby AWARDED an EAJA fee in the amount of $3,968.81. 

DONE and ORDERED this 28th day of July, 2010. 

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:09-cv-00623-CG-M Document 26 Filed 07/28/10 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000839950
<NAME>NORTH COAST ENERGY 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,421,475
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,305,145
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    111,161
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,915,161
<PP&E>                                      30,608,256
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,771,222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,879,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,955,268
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,438
<COMMON>                                       165,428
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,827,471
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,879,640
<SALES>                                      3,403,155
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,403,155
<CGS>                                        2,971,507
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,971,507
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (28,252)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             504,591
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (44,691)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (44,691)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (44,691)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Whitehall Limited, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|              
|--------------
|              
|/s/ Kay Carter
|Kay Carter    

September 1, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Diversified Futures Fund II L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       9,608,814
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,281<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,954,636<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,954,636<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (411,324)<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               230,567
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (641,891)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (641,891)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (641,891)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $30,657 and due from
DWR of $14,624.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $300,541.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $495,932 and accrued
management fees of $21,563.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $(594,590),
net change in unrealized of $93,977, and interest income of
$89,289.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4804 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4804

    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
    resources study to determine the suitability and feasibility of 
designating the memorial to Edmund S. Muskie located in Rumford, Maine, 
                 as a unit of the National Park System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2004

 Mr. Michaud introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
    resources study to determine the suitability and feasibility of 
designating the memorial to Edmund S. Muskie located in Rumford, Maine, 
                 as a unit of the National Park System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STUDY REGARDING THE MEMORIAL TO EDMUND 
              S. MUSKIE.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a special 
resources study to determine the suitability and feasibility of 
designating the memorial to Edmund S. Muskie located in Rumford, Maine, 
as a unit of the National Park System.
    (b) Study Process and Completion.--Section 8(c) of Public Law 91-
383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)) shall apply to the conduct and completion of 
the study required by this section.
    (c) Report.--The Secretary shall submit a report describing the 
results of the study required by this section to the Committee on 
Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy 
and Natural Resources of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
11132.

#### Nixon *v.*Williams.

Decided August 13, 1920.

Action for damages; from city court of Carrollton — Judge Beall. November 3, 1919.

Application for certiorari was denied by tbe Supreme Court.

*S. Holderness, Henry Strickland,*for plaintiff in error.

*Smith & Smith,*contra.

Stephens, J.

1. Where an act is of a nature calculated to produce a certain injury, the causal connection, if any, between such act and the injury is not necessarily broken by an intervening act which bears a causal relation to the injury. Either the original act or the intervening act may be the legal cause of the injury.

2. Where the plaintiff was driving a horse attached to a buggy, along a public highway, and the horse became frightened by the operation of " an approaching automobile of the defendant and fell into a ditch and was injured, the act of a third person in the buggy with the defendant, in grabbing the lines and attempting to control the frightened horse, which pulled the horse into the ditch where he was injured, was not necessarily the legal cause of the injury.

3. Whether the operation of the defendant’s automobile in frightening the horse, or the grabbing of the lines by the third person, was the legal cause of the injury to the horse, and whether or not the defendant was negligent, were issues for a jury.

4. The motion for new trial contained only the general grounds. The verdict for the plaintiff, being supported by the evidence and having the approval of the trial judge, will not be disturbed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHARLES ROBINSON, :

Petitioner, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-00488-WS-B

J. C. GILES, :

Respondent. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this

file deemed relevant to the issue raised, and there having been no

objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge made under 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion

of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby

DISMISSED due to Petitioner’s failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. §

2244(b)(3)(A). 

Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases,

“[t]he district court must issue or deny a certificate of

appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the

applicant.” Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases (December

1, 2009). "A certificate of appealability may issue only where “the

applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When a habeas

petition is dismissed on procedural grounds, such as in the instant

case, without reaching the merits of any underlying constitutional

Case 1:09-cv-00488-WS-B Document 17 Filed 03/01/10 Page 1 of 2
claim, “a COA should issue [only] when the prisoner shows...that

jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition

states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and

that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district

court was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 146 L. Ed. 2d 542 (2000); see

Miller -EL v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1039,

154 L.Ed. 2d 931 (2003); Farris v. U.S., 333 F.3d 1211, 1216 (11th

Cir. 2003)(“Without authorization, the district court lacks

jurisdiction to consider a second or successive petition.”). Under

the facts of this case, a reasonable jurist could not conclude

either that this Court is in error in dismissing the instant

petition or that Petitioner should be allowed to proceed further.

Slack, 529 U.S. at 484, 120 S. Ct. at 1604. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that because reasonable jurists could not debate whether

Petitioner’s petition should be dismissed, he is not entitled to

a certificate of appealability. 

DONE this 1st day of March, 2010.

 s/WILLIAM H. STEELE

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00488-WS-B Document 17 Filed 03/01/10 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Michelle Hartman v. Wayne Correll and Peggy Correll

Appellate case number: 01-15-00415-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-38756

Trial court: 151st District Court of Harris County

This appeal was stayed pursuant to a notice of bankruptcy stay, filed in this Court on May 

27, 2015, stating that appellee/cross-appellant, Wayne Correll, had filed, on May 20, 2015, a 

petition for relief under Chapter 13 of Title 11, United States Code, in Case 15-32769, in the 

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2; see

also 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) (automatic stay in bankruptcy). Appellant/cross-appellee Michelle 

Hartman has notified this Court that the bankruptcy case has been dismissed and provided a copy 

of the bankruptcy court’s “Order Dismissing Case with Prejudice to Refiling Another Case for 

180 Days,” signed and entered on August 20, 2015. Accordingly, we reinstate the case on the 

Court’s docket. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.3(a).

The clerk’s record, received on June 9, 2015, and the reporter’s record (volume 7 of 10), 

received on July 10, 2015, are filed in this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2.

The remainder of the reporter’s record is due to be filed within 30 days of the date of this 

order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 

Date: September 15, 2015
Exhibit 10(F)



 






EXHIBIT 10(F)

BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	2005	 	 	2006	 
	Compensation Component
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Retainer
	 	$	10,000	 	 	$	10,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Board Meetings (6 meetings @ $3,700 per meeting)
	 	$	19,200	 	 	$	22,200	 
	Board Telephone Meeting
	 	$	1,500	 	 	$	1,500	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Management Interaction Day
	 	$	2,000	 	 	$	2,000	 
	Special Meetings
	 	$	1,000	 	 	$	1,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Committee Member Meetings
	 	$	2,100	 	 	$	2,600	 
	Committee Chair Meetings
	 	$	4,200	 	 	$	4,700	 
	Regularly Scheduled Audit Telephone Meetings/Committee Member
	 	$	1,000	 	 	$	1,000	 
	Regularly Scheduled Audit Telephone Meetings/Committee Chair
	 	$	1,500	 	 	$	1,500	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Other Committees
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Committee Member Meetings
	 	$	2,100	 	 	$	2,600	 
	Committee Chair Meetings
	 	$	2,600	 	 	$	3,100	 
	Telephone Meetings (as needed)
	 	$	500	 	 	$	500	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Chairman of the Board (Yearly Restricted Stock Grant)
	 	$	200,000	 	 	$	200,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Restricted Stock Value (other than Chairman)
	 	$	100,000	 	 	$	100,000
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DARRELL EUGENE CLANTON, : 

Petitioner, : 

v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-0343-WS-M

JERRY FERRELL, : 

Respondent. : 

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this file, and a de novo determination of

those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that this habeas petition be DENIED as time-barred and that this action be

DISMISSED.

DONE and ORDERED this 29th day of December, 2005.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:05-cv-00343-WS-M Document 20 Filed 12/29/05 Page 1 of 1