alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350



In connection with the filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission of BBJ Environmental Technologies,
Inc.s (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the Report), I, Jean Caillet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify in my capacity as an officer of the
Company, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of ss.13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



The above certification is given as of the date of the Report and is limited to the periods covered by the
Report.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
have executed this Certificate on November 18, 2004.



By:

/s/ Jean CailletJean Caillet, Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original or this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission of its staff upon request.
#### DeLand *v.*Blynn et al. and Butting *v.*Blynn.

Husband and Wife — Ante-Nuptial Debts — Liability of Husband.

Under § 3, art. 3, ek. 47 R. S„ a husband is liable for tke ante-nuptial debts, of kis wife to the extent of her property received by him, exclusive of real estate and slaves.

*636Husband and Wife — Wife’s Ante-Nuptial Debts — Judgment Against Husband.

In a suit against a husband for ante-nuptial debts of the wife, judgment should not be rendered against him to- be levied on the property in his hands received by or through the wife, since all the property of the husband subject to execution is liable within the limits fixed by the statute.

March 31, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

By Sec. 3, Art. 2, Chap. 47, Rev. Stat., the common-law liability of the husband for the debts of the wife created before marriage was absolutely abrogated, and a liability prescribed. By this new standard the husband was made responsible for the ante-nuptial debts of his wife, to the amount or value of whatever he may receive by her, independent of real estate or slaves, and no further. If he receives nothing he incurs no liability, and cannot be subjected to the costs and annoyances of litigation. If the petition does not disclose the fact that some estate, other than realty or ¡slaves, has come to the hands of the husband by reason of his marriage, no cause of action against him will be presented. The doctrine accords w'ith the language of the ,statute, and was recognized as correct in the case of Husbands v. Bullock’s Adm’r. We do not concur with the reasoning nor in the conclusion of the court in the case of Beaumont v. Miller et al., 1 Met. 68, nor do we think that case in any degree is supported by the case of Fultz & Wife v. Fox, 9 B. Mon. 499.

To render a judgment against the husband, to be levied of assets in his hands received by or through the wife, is a mere idle form. As soon as her personal estate is reduced to possession it becomes the property of the husband, and is no more liable in his hands for her debts than any other estate he may own. All property owned by him-, and not exempt from the payment of debts, is liable for the wife’s debts contracted before marriage, to the amount fixed by the statute; and as the creditor derives his right to sue the husband from’ the statute, his petition must show that he has a right of action under its provisions. Otherwise his petition will not be good.

Nor will this construction result in prejudice to the rights of creditors, in case the husband declines to exercise his right to re*637duce his wife’s personalty to possession. In such a case her personalty, like her real estate, can be reached by a proceeding in equity.

*Hoenshell, for appellants.*

*Root & Hawkins, for appellee.*

For these reasons we adhere to the opinion heretofore delivered in these causes.

The petitions for a rehearing are overruled.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MICHAEL J. BROWN, :

AIS 186027,

:

Petitioner,

:

vs. CA 04-0818-BH-C

:

JERRY FARRELL,

:

Respondent.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the

issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which

objection is made, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(l)(B) and dated August 23, 2005, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

DONE this 26th day of September, 2005.

 s/ W. B. Hand 

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-00818-BH-C Document 14 Filed 09/26/05 Page 1 of 1
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  report of FMS  Financial  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  we, Craig
W. Yates,  President and Chief Executive  Officer,  and Channing L. Smith,  Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section
1350,  as adopted,  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:


     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>




<S>                                     <C>
/s/ Craig W. Yates                           /s/ Channing L. Smith
-----------------------                      ---------------------
Craig W. Yates                               Channing L. Smith
President and Chief Executive Officer        Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)               (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


Date: May 14, 2003                           Date: May 14, 2003

</TABLE>


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4868

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a test to determine 

the costs and benefits of requiring jet-propelled aircraft taking off from 

Newark International Airport, New Jersey, to conduct ascents over the 

ocean, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2004

Mr. FERGUSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a test 

to determine the costs and benefits of requiring jetpropelled aircraft taking off from Newark International 

Airport, New Jersey, to conduct ascents over the ocean, 

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEST OF AIRCRAFT OCEAN ROUTING. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—In order to examine an option for 

5 reducing aircraft noise over communities in New Jersey, 

6 the Secretary of Transportation shall conduct a 6-month 

7 test to determine the costs and benefits of requiring jet-
2

•HR 4868 IH 

1 propelled aircraft to conduct ascents after taking off from 

2 Newark International Airport, New Jersey, over the 

3 ocean. 

4 (b) COMMENCEMENT DEADLINE.—The Secretary 

5 shall commence the test under this section not later than 

6 45 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 

7 SEC. 2. REPORT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

9 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transpor10 tation shall transmit to Congress a report on the results 

11 of the test conducted under section 1. 

12 (b) CONTENTS.—The report shall include an analysis 

13 of the effects on noise reduction of ocean routing of air14 craft taking off from Newark International Airport and 

15 any recommendations and comments of the Secretary con16 cerning ocean routing of air carrier aircraft taking off 

17 from Newark International Airport.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that to hisknowledge the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended June 30,2008 of Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of Allstate Life Insurance Companyof New York.

 

August 8,2008
|   | /s/ James E. Hohmann                                         |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | James E. Hohmann                                             |   |
|   | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                                         |
|   |                                                         |
|   | /s/ John C. Pintozzi                                         |   |
|   | John C. Pintozzi                                             |   |
|   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                   |
|        |                                                              |        |  |

 

E-5

----
#### L. W. W. Vick *v.*James Keilly.

Attachment — Property Subject to.

Under Act March. 15, 1870, relating to garnishment before judgment and return of “no property found,” attachment can only be levied on money, ehoses in action, or equitable interests.

Garnishment — Amendment of Affidavit.

A garnishee plaintiff cannot ■ so amend his affidavit as to render effective a levy that he had no right to have made under the first order sued out, and accomplish an end not contemplated at the commencement of the proceeding.

APPEAL FROM MUHLENBERG CIRCUIT COURT.

September 30, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

The facts set out in the petition upon which the order of attachment was issued, show that it was the intention of appellant to avail himself of the rights conferred upon creditors by the act approved March 15th, 1870, entitled “An act to- authorize creditors in certain *101cases to garnishee before judgment and return of no property found.” An order of attachment sued out under this act can only be levied on money, choses in action, or equitable interests. *Jenkins v. Jackson, Loving, etc.,*8 Bush 373.

*J. C. Thompson, for appellant.*

-, *for appellee.*

The levy in this case was not upon property subject to seizure and sale under execution, and could have been quashed even if the affidavit had been sufficient.

It may be that under the liberal provisions of the Civil Code appellant had the right to so amend his affidavit as to malee it conform to the requirements of the act of March 15, 1870, but he did not offer to do so. He prepared and set up a ground of attachment under the 221st section of the Code. If he could do this, he could make valid and effectual a levy that he had no right to have made under the order first sued out, and accomplish an end not contemplated at the commencement of the proceeding. In other words, he would be allowed to abandon the original order of attachment and obtain a new one, and yet make the new relate back to and secure the benefits of the lien attempted to be secured under the proceeding voluntarily abandoned.

The circuit court properly adjudged that an amendment having this effect is not allowable under our rules of practice.

Judgment *affirmed.*
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**Certification of**

**Chief Financial Officer**

**of Granite Broadcasting Corporation**

 

Thiscertification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for thequarter ended June 30, 2002 of Granite Broadcasting Corporation (the “Issuer”).

 

I,Ellen McClain, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer certify that to the bestof my knowledge:

 

| (i)    | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                            |
| (ii)   | the information contained in the Form 10-Q  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Issuer.        |

 
| Dated:   August 14, 2002. |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |   |   | /s/ | ELLEN McCLAIN |
|                           |   |   |   | Ellen McClain |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT  TO BE FILED ELECTRONICALLY. FINAL PUBLISHED HARD COPY WILL NOT CONTAIN
THIS EXHIBIT. (NOR WILL THIS PAGE BE LISTED IN THE INDEX OF THIS 10-K).
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             714
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,518
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,911
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,731
<PP&E>                                          48,681
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,954
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,946
<BONDS>                                          3,719
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        641
<COMMON>                                           898
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,754
<SALES>                                         52,140<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,531<F1>
<CGS>                                           32,909
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,525
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,060
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,356
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,704
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,704
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.10
<FN>
<F1>SALES AND TOTAL REVENUES INCLUDE $5,853 MILLION OF EXCISE AND STATE GASOLINE
TAXES
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





Board of Directors



Monmouth Capital Corporation:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-3D (No. 333-131436) of Monmouth Capital Corporation of our report dated March 3, 2006, related to the consolidated balance sheets of Monmouth Capital Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, which report is incorporated by reference in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Monmouth Capital Corporation, and our report dated March 3, 2006 related to the consolidated financial statements, which report is included in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Monmouth Capital Corporation.













Cowan and Gunteski & Co., P.A.



Toms River, New Jersey





March 15, 2006
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                  (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT FOR RATIOS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 2000           1999           1998           1997           1996
                                                               --------       --------       --------       --------       --------
<S>                                                            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Loss from continuing operations before income tax benefit      $(19,060)      $ (2,403)      $ (5,798)      $ (5,698)      $ (5,713)

Add Fixed Charges:
       Interest expense                                          14,086         11,712          1,649          1,693          2,036
       Amortization of financing costs                              900            620            113            175            127
                                                               --------       --------       --------       --------       --------
                        Total income (loss) as defined         $ (4,074)      $  9,929       $ (4,036)      $ (3,830)      $ (3,550)
                                                               ========       ========       ========       ========       ========

Fixed Charges:
       Interest expense                                        $ 14,086       $ 11,712       $  1,649       $  1,693       $  2,036
       Capitalized interest                                          --            203             59              9             --
       Amortization of financing costs                              900            620            113            175            127
                                                               --------       --------       --------       --------       --------
                        Total fixed charges                    $ 14,986       $ 12,535       $  1,821       $  1,877       $  2,163
                                                               ========       ========       ========       ========       ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                (0.27)          0.79          (2.22)         (2.04)         (1.64)


Additional income required to meet a 1.0 ratio:                $ 19,060       $  2,606       $  5,857       $  5,707       $  5,713
</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMEL MONTGOMERY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 400 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of March, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNIFAB
INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S MARCH 31,1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       8,379,131
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,396,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    292,284
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,075,707
<PP&E>                                      14,413,360
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,611,036
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,409,934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,672,817
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,487
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,971,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,409,934
<SALES>                                     68,563,987
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            68,563,987
<CGS>                                       57,789,474
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               60,756,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,830
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,274,935
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,896,228
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,378,707
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,378,707
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.25
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                               TELVUE CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. sec. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of TelVue Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Murphy,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date:   08/14/2008                     /s/ Joseph M. Murphy
                                       --------------------
                                       Joseph M. Murphy
                                       President (Chief Executive Officer)