alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
10506.

#### Jones *v.*The State.

Decided July 22, 1919.

Indictment for larceny; from Bibb superior court—Judge Mathews. April 5, 1919.

*Hubert F.*Rawls, for plaintiff in error.

*Charles H. Garrett, solicitor-general pro tem.*

Stephens, J.

1. Where the trial judge in his charge to the jury in a criminal case properly defines the offense with which the defendant stands charged, it is not error to fail to define such offense in the precise language of the Penal Code.

2. The defendant was charged with a felony, the punishment for which may, on recommendation by the jury when approved by the trial judge, be as for a misdemeanor. The trial judge fully instructed the jury that in the event of the defendant’s conviction, should they recommend that he be punished as for a misdemeanor, this recommendation would be carried out only in the discretion of the trial judge. The charge was not error as being confusing in this respect, as set out in the 5th ground of the motion for a new trial.

3. The jury was fully instructed as to the degree of proof required to convict defendant as. principal in the second degree, and the trial judge did not err in failing to charge as set out in the 6th ground of the motion for a new trial. Moreover, the charge given was a correct statement of the law. “A correct statement of law embraced in a charge to the jury is not erroneous because the court failed in. the same connection to give to the jury other appropriate instructions.” *Hill*v. *State,*18 *Ga. App.*259 (89 S. E. 351); *Lucas*v. *State,*110 *Ga.*756 (36 S. E. 87); *Conley*v. *State,*21 *Ga. App.*134 (94 S. E. 261).

4. The trial judge did not err in charging the jury as to the degree of proof necessary to convict upon circumstantial evidence.

5. Where the solicitor-general, in his argument to the jury, stated that he had “run down a gang of thieves who had been stealing automobiles,” that the defendant was “a thug and a thief,” and after-wards stated in' the presence of the jury that such remarks were improper, and whore the trial judge instructed the jury that such remarks were improper and should not be considered *by*them, that the jury should try the ease on the evidence, there was no error in failing to declare a mistrial upon the ground that such remarks were improper and prejudicial.

6. The remaining special grounds of the motion for new trial, not being argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated by this court as abandoned.

7. The evidence authorizes the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Bloodioorth, J., concur.*
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4845 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose an excise tax 

on the termination of retiree prescription drug coverage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2004 

Mr. ENGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose 

an excise tax on the termination of retiree prescription 

drug coverage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Corporate 

5 Accountability Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCISE TAX ON TERMINATION OF RETIREE PRE7 SCRIPTION DRUG COVERAGE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 47 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 (relating to certain group health plans) 

10 is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 
2 

•HR 4845 IH 

1 ‘‘SEC. 5000A. TERMINATION OF RETIREE PRESCRIPTION 

2 DRUG COVERAGE. 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There is hereby imposed on any 

4 employer or employee organization that contributes to a 

5 group health plan (as defined in section 5000(b)) a tax 

6 on the termination of the provision of prescription drug 

7 benefits to any qualified retiree under the plan. 

8 ‘‘(b) RATE OF TAX.—The rate of tax imposed under 

9 this section is— 

10 ‘‘(1) $750 in the case of a qualified retiree with 

11 self-only prescription drug coverage under the plan 

12 (determined at the time of the termination of bene13 fits), and 

14 ‘‘(2) $1,500 in the case of any other qualified 

15 retiree. 

16 ‘‘(c) QUALIFIED RETIREE.—For purposes of this sec17 tion, the term ‘qualified retiree’ means any former em18 ployee of the employer— 

19 ‘‘(1) who attained age 65 before the termi20 nation of benefits referred to in subsection (a), and 

21 ‘‘(2) whose employment with the employer ter22 minated before the date of the enactment of this sec23 tion. 

24 ‘‘(d) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary may issue regu25 lations to carry out the purposes of this section, including 
3 

•HR 4845 IH 

1 regulations with respect to the meaning of the terms ‘ter2 mination’ and ‘prescription drug benefits’. 

3 ‘‘(e) TRANSFERS TO MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUG

4 ACCOUNT.—The Secretary shall from time to time trans5 fer from the the general fund of the Treasury to the Medi6 care Prescription Drug Account in the Federal Supple7 mentary Medical Insurance Trust Fund amounts equal to 

8 the taxes imposed under this section.’’. 

9 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

10 for such chapter is amended by adding at the end the fol11 lowing new item: 

‘‘Sec. 5000A. Termination of retiree prescription drug coverage.’’. 

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section shall apply to terminations of benefits which 

14 take effect on or after the date of the enactment of this 

15 Act. 

Æ
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4378

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that members of the 

National Guards who served in the counties declared disasters in response 

to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and who served under 

State duty so that they could immediately assist in the response to 

the terrorist attacks should have that service counted as Federal active 

duty for purposes of military retirement credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2004

Mrs. MALONEY (for herself, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. 

TOWNS, Mr. WALSH, Mr. NADLER, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. WEINER, Mrs. 

MCCARTHY of New York, and Mr. ISRAEL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that 

members of the National Guards who served in the counties declared disasters in response to the September 11, 

2001, terrorist attacks, and who served under State duty 

so that they could immediately assist in the response 

to the terrorist attacks should have that service counted 

as Federal active duty for purposes of military retirement 

credit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4378 IH 

1 SECTION 1. MILITARY RETIREMENT CREDIT FOR CERTAIN 

2 SERVICE PERFORMED BY MEMBERS OF THE 

3 NATIONAL GUARD ARISING FROM THE TER4 RORIST ATTACKS OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001. 

5 (a) RETIREMENT POINTS.—Section 12732(a)(2)(A) 

6 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ after clause (i); 

8 (2) by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (ii); 

9 and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(iii) full-time service under title 32 

12 while performing duty to which the person 

13 was ordered immediately following the ter14 rorist attacks on the United States of Sep15 tember 11, 2001, in a county designated 

16 by the President by reason of such attacks 

17 as a Federal disaster area, while such serv18 ice continued without a break in service;’’. 

19 (b) COMPUTATION OF RETIREMENT.—Section 12733 

20 of such title is amended by adding at the end the fol21 lowing: 

22 ‘‘(6) The person’s days of active service under 

23 title 32 described in clause (iii) of section 

24 12732(a)(2)(A) of this title.’’. 

25 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

26 this section shall apply in the case of any person who be-
3

•HR 4378 IH 

1 came entitled to retired pay under chapter 1223 of title 

2 10, United States Code, between September 11, 2001, and 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act as if such amend4 ments had been in effect on the day before the effective 

5 date of such person’s entitlement to receive such retired 

6 pay.

Æ
Order entered December 29, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00064-CR

LOUIS JAMES BROWN, III, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-83597-2019

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a reply 

brief. Appellant filed his motion after we informed him that the Court had 

received but did not file his reply brief because it was untimely and that the Court 

would not consider it without a motion for extension of time. We GRANT the 

motion and ORDER the appellant’s reply brief filed as of the date of this order. 

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Morgans Foods, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
Rule 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
   Date: July 13, 2009
    /s/ Kenneth L. HignettKenneth L. HignettSenior Vice President,
      Chief Financial Officer 52
The Open-Source SDR LTE Platform for First Responders

• An open-source end-to-end LTE network platform for public safety research & development. 

• A reference implementation of key LTE features for first responders. 

• Enabling, supporting and growing the public safety broadband development ecosystem. 

• Providing a commercialization path for public safety LTE using proven business models.

• Building upon the proven srsLTE suite of open-source libraries, tools and applications.

• Software Radio Systems (SRS) leadership team

• Proven track record of delivering open, high-performance and 

user-friendly LTE applications and tools

• Successful, sustainable business model for commercialization and 

deployment.

Leadership Open Source

• GNU Affero General Public License (AGPLv3)

• Ensuring dissemination of the technology

• Maximizing usability

• Safeguarding availability

• Guaranteeing sustainability

The Project

• Complete end-to-end LTE network including: 

• Core network (EPC)

• Basestations (eNodeBs)

• Mobile terminals (UEs)

• Key features for public safety: 

• Priority, Pre-emption and Quality of Service (QPP). 

• Proximity Services (ProSe) 

• Evolved Multimedia Broadcast/Multicast Service (eMBMS)

• Multimedia broadcast single frequency networks (MBSFN) 

• Single cell point-to-multipoint (SC-PTM). 

• Carrier aggregation. 

• IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) and Voice-over-LTE (VoLTE)

Software Radio

• Powerful, low cost approach

• General-purpose hardware

• Real-world compatibility and performance

• Full-bandwidth LTE operation 

• Frequency flexibility across all LTE bands
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4109

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 3, 2004

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

AN ACT

To allow seniors to file their Federal income tax on a new 

Form 1040S.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 4109 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Simple Tax for Seniors 

3 Act of 2004’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FORM 1040S FOR SENIORS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury (or 

6 the Secretary’s delegate) shall make available a form, to 

7 be known as ‘‘Form 1040S’’, for use by individuals to file 

8 the return of tax imposed by chapter 1 of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986. Such form shall be as similar as 

10 practicable to Form 1040EZ, except that—

11 (1) the form shall be available to individuals 

12 who have attained age 65 as of the close of the tax13 able year, 

14 (2) the form may be used even if income for the 

15 taxable year includes—

16 (A) social security benefits (as defined in 

17 section 86(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

18 1986), 

19 (B) distributions from qualified retirement 

20 plans (as defined in section 4974(c) of such 

21 Code), annuities or other such deferred pay22 ment arrangements, 

23 (C) interest and dividends, or 

24 (D) capital gains and losses taken into ac25 count in determining adjusted net capital gain 

26 (as defined in section 1(h)(3)), and 
3

HR 4109 RFS 

1 (3) the form shall be available without regard 

2 to the amount of any item of taxable income or the 

3 total amount of taxable income for the taxable year. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The form required by sub5 section (a) shall be made available for taxable years begin6 ning after December 31, 2004.

Passed the House of Representatives June 2, 2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Historic Preservation Properties 1989
LP ("HPP'89") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HPP'89.


/s/ Terrence P. Sullivan
-------------------------------------
Terrence P. Sullivan
General Partner
(Performing similar functions of the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer)

Date: March 11, 2006
Exhibit 32 .1


       Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Imagenetix, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), I, William P. Spencer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

          1)   the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
               Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
               as amended; and

          2)   the information contained in the Quaarterly Report fairly
               presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
               results of operations of the Company.


 Dated: August 16, 2005            /s/WILLIAM P. SPENCER
                                   William P. Spencer
                                   Chief Executive Officer and
                                   President
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-12-000068829-MAY-201308:47 AM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name and Committee Code:*                         Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee #13883.                    

*Date and Time:*

January 28, 2015 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.

January 29, 2015 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, Room 1235, Stafford I Building, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Jim Ulvestad, Division Director, Division of Astronomical Sciences, Suite 1045, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703-292-7165.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations to the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of mutual interest and concern to the agencies.                    

*Agenda:*                         To hear presentations of current programming by representatives from NSF, NASA, DOE and other agencies relevant to astronomy and astrophysics; to discuss current and potential areas of cooperation between the agencies; to formulate recommendations for continued and new areas of cooperation and mechanisms for achieving them.                    

Dated: December 2, 2014.

Suzanne Plimpton,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2014-28573 Filed 12-4-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENT INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000839437
<NAME> AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, INC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,093
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     51,059
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,204
<PP&E>                                         350,344
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,905
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 484,132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,896
<BONDS>                                        326,221
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   (168,648)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   484,132
<SALES>                                         27,848
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,928
<CGS>                                           23,631
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   721
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,007
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,058)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,691
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,367)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,367)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (12.4)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (12.4)
        

</TABLE>
digests
TUE-AM1

Performance Evaluation

Chairs: James Spall & Craig Schlenoff
TUE-AM2

Special Session I: Cognitive Systems of EU Cognition Programme

Organizer: Patrick Courtney
TUE-PM1

Human-System Interaction

Chairs: Michael Lewis & Birsen Donmez
TUE-PM2

Special Session II: Architectures for Unmanned Systems

Organizers: Roger Bostelman & James Albus
WED-AM1

Metrics & Measures

Chairs: Scott Spetka & Robert Wade
WED-AM2

Special Session III: Performance Metrics for Perception in Intelligent Manufacturing

Organizers: Tsai Hong & Roger Eastman
WED-PM1

Autonomous Systems

Chairs: James Gunderson & Edward Tunstel
WED-PM2

Special Session IV: Results from a Virtual Manufacturing Automation Competition

Organizers: Stephen Balakirsky, Raj Madhavan & Chris Scrapper
THU-AM1

Model-based Performance Assessment

Chairs: Kate Remley & Kam Saidi
THU-AM2

Special Session V: Quantitative Assessment of Robot-generated Maps

Organizers: Chris Scrapper, Raj Madhavan & Stephen Balakirsky
THU-PM1

Special Session VI: Biologically Inspired Models of Intelligent Systems 

Organizer: Gary Berg-Cross
THU-PM2 

Special Session VII: Medical Robotics

Organizer: Ram Sriram