-

= =

Vendor L- VISIT_POE Left Index 

threshold 2100 (far,tar) (0.0109719,0.952) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0102525 0.0151256 0.00899825 0.00753544 0.00652734 

TAR 0.997288 0.993517 0.95771 0.721854 0.513699 

Figure 1. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset VISIT_POE - Left Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor L- VISIT_POE Right Index 

threshold 2000 (far,tar) (0.0123597,0.961167) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0101644 0.0156823 0.010491 0.00873163 0.00734999 

TAR 0.992257 0.987092 0.961268 0.806723 0.601852 

Figure 2. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset VISIT_POE - Right Index 
 

= =

Vendor L- VISIT_POE_BVA - Left Index 

threshold 2100 (far,tar) ( 0.0108348,0.955) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00714359 0.019316 0.00929401 0.00685894 0.00379261 

TAR 0.993537 0.988332 0.952216 0.841808 0.518797 

Figure 3. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset VISIT_POE_BVA - Left Index 
 

= =

Vendor L- VISIT_POE_BVA - Right Index 

threshold 2000 (far,tar) (0.012755,0.972833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00833504 0.0201448 0.0098543 0.00706637 0.00943423 

TAR 0.994956 0.992063 0.965998 0.900901 0.717172 

Figure 4. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset VISIT_POE_BVA - Right Index 
 

= =

Vendor L- BEN- Left Index 

threshold 2400 (far,tar) (0.0118882,0.9345) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00905397 0.0315659 0.00781943 0.00447302 0.00423189 

TAR 0.998524 0.998914 0.979866 0.711864 0.298387 

Figure 5. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset BEN - Left Index 
 

= =

Vendor L- BEN- Right Index 

threshold 2400 (far,tar) (0.0123131,0.958667) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00845091 0.0298479 0.00795388 0.00459847 0.0036539 

TAR 0.999357 0.998099 0.976316 0.774436 0.345679 

Figure 6. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset BEN - Right Index 
 

= =

Vendor L- BEN- Left Thumb 

threshold 3200 (far,tar) (0.0121938,0.9815) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0128363 0.0161176 0.00880636 0.00739672 0.00136635 

TAR 0.998789 0.998127 0.996918 0.950549 0.491803 

Figure 7. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset BEN - Left Thumb 
 

= =

Vendor L- BEN- Right Thumb 

threshold 2900 (far,tar) (0.0107298,0.988333) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00970804 0.0127654 0.00870271 0.00749023 0.00199504 

TAR 0.999581 0.999072 0.998462 0.972789 0.47619 

Figure 8. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset BEN - Right Thumb 
 

-

= =

Vendor L- DHS10 Left Index 

threshold 2200 (far,tar) (0.0124615,0.889833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0124629 0.0250822 0.0118613 0.00773394 0.0105066 

TAR 0.995575 0.997959 0.958853 0.772908 0.377691 

Figure 9. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset DHS10- Left Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor L- DHS10 Right Index 

threshold 2200 (far,tar) (0.0112961,0.896167) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00917713 0.0233006 0.010677 0.00390249 0.00920637 

TAR 0.993711 0.993769 0.937796 0.772947 0.419223 

Figure 10. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset DHS10 - Right Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor L- DHS10 Left Thumb 

threshold 2900 (far,tar) (0.0124151,0.949833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0173725 0.0108684 0.0122651 0.0163631 0.00536556 

TAR 0.99919 0.993617 0.974557 0.821862 0.473684 

Figure 11. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset DHS10- Left Thumb 
 

-

= =

Vendor L- DHS10 Right Thumb 

threshold 2500 (far,tar) (0.0106602,0.957) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0138347 0.00789449 0.010551 0.0166194 0.00548008 

TAR 0.995502 0.993396 0.967742 0.858639 0.507812 

Figure 12. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset DHS10 - Right Thumb 
 

-

= =

Vendor L- TXDPS Left Index 

threshold 2100 (far,tar) (0.013369,0.947667) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0131411 0.0172725 0.0142621 0.0146495 0.0138301 

TAR 0.997409 0.995221 0.967361 0.859649 0.485849 

Figure 13. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset TXDPS - Left Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor L- TXDPS Right Index 

threshold 2200 (far,tar) (0.0123164,0.953833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00811523 0.0169116 0.0162052 0.00636159 0.00943273 

TAR 0.997666 0.99477 0.973312 0.773006 0.451087 

Figure 14. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset TXDPS - Right Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor L- TXDPS Left Thumb 

threshold 3200 (far,tar) (0.0108322,0.968) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0138372 0.00775044 0.0113855 0.0138088 0.00244158 

TAR 0.99632 0.992723 0.977413 0.856481 0.411765 

Figure 15. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset TXDPS - Left Thumb 
 

-

threshold 2700 (far,tar) (0.0117252,0.9785) = =

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0144605 0.00749607 0.012496 0.0171369 0.00625898 

TAR 0.996678 0.995345 0.987027 0.798561 0.404762 

Vendor L- TXDPS Right Thumb 

g

Figure 16. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset TXDPS - Right Thumb 
 

-

= =

Vendor L- DOS C- Left Index 

threshold 1900 (far,tar) (0.0116551,0.93) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.015516 0.0118491 0.0105652 0.010251 0.0104793 

TAR 0.992765 0.979052 0.898446 0.723077 0.445545 

Figure 17. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset DOS-C - Left Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor L- DOS C- Right Index 

threshold 1800 (far,tar) (0.0123504,0.959667) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0134724 0.01328 0.00946196 0.00976284 0.0108311 

TAR 0.997039 0.983217 0.918733 0.757143 0.513889 

Figure 18. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset DOS-C - Right Index 
 

= =

Vendor L- DHS2-C- Left Index 

threshold 2100 (far,tar) (0.0118095,0.941576) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0104377 0.0126263 0.0106569 0.00859158 0.0104858 

TAR 0.987792 0.967039 0.92608 0.836364 0.808765 

Figure 19. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset DHS2-C - Left Index 
 

= =

Vendor L- DHS2-C- Right Index 

threshold 2000 (far,tar) (0.0120903,0.943954) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00903642 0.0138391 0.0108812 0.00956091 0.00877803 

TAR 0.992832 0.978378 0.92953 0.886364 0.770677 

Figure 20. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor L - Dataset DHS2-C - Right