alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4688 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4688

  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 
                        Chesapeake Bay Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2004

  Mr. Gilchrest (for himself, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. Schrock, Mr. 
Cardin, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Ruppersberger, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Castle, Mr. 
  Weldon of Pennsylvania, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. Platts, Mr. English, Mr. 
    Cummings, Mr. Wynn, Mr. Murtha, Mr. Hoyer, and Mr. Bartlett of 
  Maryland) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 
                        Chesapeake Bay Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM.

    Section 117(j) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1267(j)) is amended by striking ``2005'' and inserting ``2010''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    100
<COMMON>                                       4
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (12,060)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,060)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.32)
        


</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4696 

To promote the use of anaerobic digesters by agricultural producers and 

rural small businesses to produce renewable energy and improve environmental quality. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2004 

Mr. MCHUGH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To promote the use of anaerobic digesters by agricultural 

producers and rural small businesses to produce renewable energy and improve environmental quality. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTERS TO PRODUCE 

4 RENEWABLE ENERGY. 

5 Section 9006(a) of the Farm Security and Rural In6 vestment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 8106(a)) is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

8 end; 
2 

•HR 4696 IH 

1 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at 

2 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(3) promote the use of anaerobic digesters to 

5 produce renewable energy.’’. 

6 SEC. 2. USE OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTERS TO IMPROVE ENVI7 RONMENTAL QUALITY. 

8 Section 1240A(6)(A) of the Food Security Act of 

9 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3839aa–1) is amended by inserting ‘‘(in10 cluding an anaerobic digester)’’ after ‘‘site-specific animal 

11 waste management facility’’. 

Æ
Exhibit 32

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Qwest Corporation ("Qwest"), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of Qwest on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Qwest. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit
to such Form 10-K. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Qwest and will be retained by Qwest and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

|Dated: March 16, 2004 |  | By: | /s/RICHARD C. NOTEBAERTRichard C. Notebaert
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | 
|--------------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Dated: March 16, 2004 |  | By: | /s/OREN G. SHAFFEROren G. Shaffer
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer      | 

---

QuickLinks
#### Frank Henry *v.*Louisville Rolling Mill Company.

Landlord and Tenant — Lease—Record of.

A lease recorded in ‘the bond and power of attorney book, where sales of personal property or mortgages of personal property are recorded, is not notice to a purchaser of the leased premises without actual knowledge of the lease.

APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

November 11, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

It is not necessary to determine whether the lease to Burns was a recordable instrument or not, as the evidence clearly shows that by the act of the parties to that instrument, the ap*296pellant, who was an innocent purchaser for a valuable consideration, could have, had no constructive notice of its existence. The manner in which' the instrument is drafted and the name by which it is designated both by the lessor and lessee, misled the clerk and caused him to record it in bond and power of attorney book, where sales of personalty or mortgages of personalty are recorded. This writing thus recorded and lodged for record with the writing to be entered in the book, where, in tracing the title to real estate, no one ever looks, should not be regarded as notice to purchasers of the existence of a lien, if any was retained. If the interest leased by Merrell was even subject to the debt, we can not see how the chancellor could extend the lien so as to embrace another lease by the terms of which no lien for the $250.00 is pretended to exist. All the buildings on the property passed by the sale of the property to the appellant; and although the evidence shows that he was the only party not in fault, still the chancellor compels him to pay the debt. The matters on the 'cross-petition of Burns against Wilson were not disposed of by the court below, for the reason that the chancellor entertained the opinion that the property was liable for the amount of the note. Burns claims that, by the contract between himself and Wilson, Wilson was to pay this debt. Whether the evidence sustained him in this, we do not now adjudge, as that branch of the case is not before us on the appeal, and has not been considered. The judgment of the court below, so far as it subjects the property sold Henry to the payment of the debt, is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the original and cross-petitions as against Henry. The cross-petition of Burns may be retained for further adjudication, upon which additional proof should be heard, if offered.

*Sweeney & Abbott, for appellant.*

*Bullitt, for appellee.*
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 21

                         Subsidiaries of The Registrant


                                                                   STATE OF
NAME                                                            INCORPORATION

The Annapolis Banking and Trust Company                               Maryland
Baltimore Trust Company                                               Delaware
Bank of Southern Maryland                                             Maryland
Calvert Bank and Trust Company                                        Maryland
The Chestertown Bank of Maryland                                      Maryland
The Citizens National Bank                                       United States
County Banking & Trust Company                                        Maryland
Farmers & Merchants Bank - Eastern Shore                              Virginia
The Fidelity Bank                                                     Maryland
The First National Bank of St. Mary's                            United States
The Forest Hill State Bank                                            Maryland
Fredericktown Bank & Trust Company                                    Maryland
Marshall National Bank and Trust Company                         United States
MBC Agency, Inc.                                                      Maryland
  Mercantile Life Insurance Company                                    Arizona
MBC Realty, LLC                                                       Maryland
Mercantile-Safe Deposit and Trust Company                             Maryland
  Boyd Watterson Asset Management LLC                                 Ohio
  Mercantile Mortgage Corporation                                     Maryland
     Columbia National Real Estate & Finance                          Maryland
  Hopkins Plaza Agency, Inc.                                          Maryland
  MBC Leasing Corp.                                                   Maryland
  Mercantile Capital Advisors, Inc.                                   Maryland
  Hopkins Plaza Securities, Inc.                                      Maryland
The National Bank of Fredericksburg                              United States
Peninsula Bank                                                        Maryland
The Peoples Bank of Maryland                                          Maryland
Potomac Valley Bank                                                   Maryland
St. Michaels Bank                                                     Maryland
Westminster Union Bank                                                Maryland

Each of the foregoing subsidiaries conducts business under its corporate name.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 71459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28296]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Effective date: December 2, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 25, 2014, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail 
Contract 99 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2015-9, CP2015-12.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Requirements.
[FR Doc. 2014-28296 Filed 12-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Overview of the 

Applied Genetics Group

Peter M. Vallone Ph.D.

Leader, Applied Genetics Group

November 9, 2016






Thank you!

peter.vallone@nist.gov
EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                        -------------------------------

We consnet to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 33-28045,  33-65140,  333-28395 and 333-57873)  pertaining to the
1988 Joint  Incentive  and  Non-Qualified  Stock Option Plan, as amended and the
1988 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended of United Capital
Corp. of our report dated  February 14, 2001,  with respect to the  consolidated
financial  statements  and  schedules of United  Capital  Corp.  included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                                  ERNST & YOUNG LLP


New York, New York
March 26, 2001
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-11417

Conference Calendar

 

CEVERO GONGORA CASTILLO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES;

A. O’BRYAN, Supv. Off.

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3-96-CV-2430-D

- - - - - - - - - -

June 18, 1997

Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Cevero Gongora Castillo, #498841, appeals the dismissal of

his § 1983 action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2). Castillo’s challenge to his place of confinement

lacks an arguable basis in law, and his challenge to the fact of

his confinement is not cognizable in a § 1983 action. See

Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 224-25 (1976); Jackson v. Vannoy,
No. 96-11417

- 2 -

49 F.3d 175, 177 (5th Cir. 1995). The district court did not err

in dismissing the action as frivolous pursuant to § 1915(e)(2). 

See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). 

This appeal is frivolous and is hereby dismissed. See

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. 

R. 42.2. We caution Castillo that any additional frivolous

appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To

avoid sanctions, Castillo is further cautioned to review any

pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that

are frivolous. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

              DAISYTEK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                STATEMENTS RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>       
                                                                      
                                                                      
                                          Fiscal Year Ended           
                                               March 31,              
                                   ---------------------------------  
                                     1998        1997         1996    
                                   -------      -------      -------  
<S>                                <C>          <C>          <C>      
Net Income                         $16,160      $13,367      $10,767  
                                   =======      =======      =======  

Weighted average common shares
  outstanding                       14,343       13,826       13,514  
                                   =======      =======      =======  

Net income per common 
  share-diluted                    $  1.13      $  0.97      $  0.80  
                                   =======      =======      =======  

Calculation of weighted average
  common shares:

  Weighted average common
    shares outstanding              13,566       12,934       12,602  

  Weighted average common 
    stock options, utilizing the
    treasury stock method              777          892          912  
                                   -------      -------      -------  
                                    14,343       13,826       13,514  
                                   =======      =======      =======  

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4554 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4554

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 40 Putnam Avenue in Hamden, Connecticut, as the ``Linda White-Epps 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2004

 Ms. DeLauro introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 40 Putnam Avenue in Hamden, Connecticut, as the ``Linda White-Epps 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LINDA WHITE-EPPS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 40 Putnam Avenue in Hamden, Connecticut, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Linda White-Epps Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Linda White-
Epps Post Office.
                                 <all>
```
10618.

#### Towns *v.*The State.

Decided October 10, 1919.

Accusation of abandoment of child; from city court of Floyd county—Judge Nunnally. April 24, 1919.

*Harris & Hcuris,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. F. Kelly, solicitor,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

1. On the trial of one for the abandonment of his minor child it is not error to exclude testimony offered by the defendant to the effect that his wife, pregnant with her unborn child, abandoned him, despite his entreaties for her to stay and live with him. *Moore*v. *State,*1 *Ga. App.*502 (57 S. E. 1016); *Parrish*v. *State,*10 *Ga. App.*836 (74 S. E. 445).

2. Where the absent father has for two years immediately preceding the finding of the accusation against him failed and refused to provide for his dependent child, the time when the original separation took place is entirely immaterial. The continuing dependency of the child vitalizes the offense, and the fact that the absence, and even the dependency, began more than two years prior to the accusation affords no ground for the interposition of the statute of limitations. *Phelps*v. *State,*10 *Ga. App.*41 (72 S. E. 524); *Campbell*v. *State,*20 *Ga. App.*190 (92 S. E. 951).

3. The evidence authorized the conviction of the accused, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luhe and Bloockoorth, JJ., eoneur.*
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Furnished Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Southern Investors Service Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December
31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric Schumann, Senior Vice President  Finance and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Eric SchumannName:

Eric SchumannTitle:

Senior Vice President  FinancePrincipal Financial and Accounting OfficerDate:

April 15, 2005




A signed original of this
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Southern Investors Service Company, Inc. and will be retained by Southern Investors Service Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.