alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         269,383
<SECURITIES>                                 2,461,868
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     17,339
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,748,590
<PP&E>                                           7,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,756,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          862,953
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,630
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,859,870
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,756,453
<SALES>                                         36,086
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               519,626
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (483,540)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4541 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment Red 185. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2004 

Mr. LANGEVIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment 

Red 185. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PIGMENT RED 185. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.32.26 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2002’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2006’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

9 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

10 January 1, 2003. 

Æ
May 30, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

VICTORIA V. OCHSNER, Appellant

NO. 14-11-01081-CV V.

PRESTON A. OCHSNER, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Preston A. 

Ochsner, signed October 26, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We 

have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the 

judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Victoria V. Ochsner to pay all costs incurred in this 

appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended February 28,
2010, (the Report), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Leonard R. Stein-SapirLeonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended February 28,
2010 (the Report), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Kenneth L. HignettKenneth L. Hignett, Senior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4646

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the holding of Federal 

district court in Plattsburgh, New York, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 22, 2004

Mr. MCHUGH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the 

holding of Federal district court in Plattsburgh, New 

York, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PLACE OF HOLDING COURT IN THE NORTHERN 

4 DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. 

5 Section 112(a) of title 28, United States Code, is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘and Watertown’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘Watertown, and Plattsburgh’’.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DONNA J. BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC.,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-10-00001-CV

Appeal from the

Country Court at Law No. 3

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2007-5320) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to

TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(1). Appellant has complied with the requirements of TEX.R.APP.P.

42.1(a)(1), and having considered the motion we conclude it should be granted as to the

dismissal request. However, Appellant also requests that this Court assess costs against the

incurring party. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(d) permits this Court to assess costs

agsinst the incurring party only pursuant to an agreement between the parties. See TEX.R.APP.P.

42.1(d)(stating that “[a]bsent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the

appellant.”). As the motion does not indicate the parties have agreed otherwise, we must tax

costs against Appellant. TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(d). Therefore, we GRANT Appellant’s motion to

dismiss, and DENY Appellant’s motion to share costs. The appeal is dismissed and costs will be

taxed against Appellant.
February 25, 2010

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

-2-
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

YOLANDA PATRICIA GONZALEZ,

APPELLANT,

V.

IRMA PEREZ,

APPELLEE. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 18

- 00206

- CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2017DCM7313 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and remand the cause for further

proceedings, in accordance with this Court’s opinion. We further order that Appellant recover

from Appellee all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEXAS ELPASO, TEXAS
DONNAJ . BROWN, Appellant, v. HOB BYL OB BYSTORES, I NC., Appellee
. §

§ § § § § No. 08-10-00001- CV

Appea l from the Country Court at L aw No. 3 of El Paso County , Texas (TC# 2007-5320)

MEMORAN DUM OP INION Pending be fore the Court is Appellant’s motion to dism iss this appea l pursuant to T E X .R.A P P .P. 42.1(a)( 1). Appe llant has complied with the re quirements of T E X .R.A P P .P. 42.1(a) (1), a

nd having considere d the motion we conc lude it should be g rante d as to the dismiss al re quest. Howe ver, A ppellant also re quests that this Court assess costs ag ainst the incurringparty . Texas Rule of Appellate Proc edure 42.1(d) pe rmits this Court to assess costs ag sinst the incurring party only pursuant to an a g ree ment betwee n the par ties. See T E X .R.A P P .P. 42.1(d)( stating that “[a]bs ent ag ree ment of the pa rties, the cour

t will tax costs ag ainst the appellant.” ). As the motion does not indicate the parties have ag ree d otherwise, w e must tax costs ag ainst Appellant. T E X .R.A P P .P. 42.1(d). Ther efor e, we GRANT Appe llant’s motion to dismiss , and DEN Y Appellant’ s motion t o share costs. The a ppeal is dismissed and costs will be taxed ag ainst Appellant.Fe bruar

y 25, 2010 DAVI D WEL L I NGTONCHEW, C hief Just ice Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ
.

-2-
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4741 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4741

   To suspend temporarily the duty on Diresul Brown CR Liquid Crude.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2004

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on Diresul Brown CR Liquid Crude.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON DIRESUL BROWN CR LIQUID CRUDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.35.02      Diresul Brown CR    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Liquid Crude                                                       31/2008
                         (leuco sulfur
                         dye) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         3204.19.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James W. Bernau, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc.

By:	 /s/ James W. Bernau
Name: James W. Bernau
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32(b)

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      The undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of Jordan Industries,
Inc., an Illinois corporation (the "Registrant"), hereby certifies that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Periodic Report") of the Registrant for the
quarter ended June 30, 2004, which accompanies this certification, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78m(a)) and that the information contained in the Periodic
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: August 16, 2004

/s/ Norman R. Bates
---------------------------------------
Norman R. Bates
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President
and Assistant Secretary
#### The Town of Princeton *v.*Vierling.

*Town.—License to Sell*Liquor.—Towns have no power to require a license for the sale of intoxicating liquors.

*Same.—Pleading.—Complaint to Recover Money Paid for*License.—A complaint against a town to recover money paid for a license to sell intoxicating liquors, alleging that the money was extorted from the plaintiff *by*the officers of the town, and that it was paid to avoid arrest, fine, and imprisonment, and that repayment has been demanded, is good.

APPEAL from the Gibson Common Pleas.

*D. F. Embree,*for appellant.

*J. Baker,*for appellee.

Pettit, C. J.

The appellee sued the appellant, to recover back money paid for license to sell liquor. The trustees of the town had passed ordinances prohibiting the sale of liquor by the quart, or by any larger quantity, and against retailing liquor without a license, and had imposed a heayy fine for any violation of said- ordinances. The statute, 1 G. & H. 631, sec. 57, provides for the arrest and imprisonment of any person for the violation of an ordinance of a town, until the fine and costs are paid or replevied.

We have held, in several cases, that towns have no power to require a license for the sale of liquor. *Deutschman*v. *The Town of Charlestown, post,*p. 449 ; *Town of Martinsville*v. *Frieze,*33 Ind. 507; *Town of Martinsville*v. *Gillig,*33 Ind. 510. And we adhere to the rulings in those cases.

The complaint is in six paragraphs, and each alleges that the money was extorted from the plaintiff by the officers of the town, and that he paid the same to avoid arrest, fine, and imprisonment; that he had demanded repayment, etc.; and asking judgment for the amount paid under these circumstances. There was a demurrer for want of sufficient facts to each of these paragraphs overruled; and the correctness of this ruling is the only question in the case.

We hold that this ruling was correct, and approve of the ruling in the case of *Harvey & Boyd*v. *The President and Board of Trustees of the Town of Olney,*42 Ill. 336.

The judgment is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant.
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002           In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMDL, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Gary L. Dreher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        August 14, 2006 /s/ Gary L. Dreher   Gary L. Dreher   Chief Executive Officer
#### Jacob G. Cohen, Appellant, *v.*Morris Wolgel, etc., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

June, 1919.)

Statute of Frauds—what is a sufficient memorandum under — Personal Property Law, § 85.

A bill of goods, priced, made under the printed name of the buyers by their direction and describing the goods as *“*sold to L. G. Gangel (plaintiff’s assignor), New York City” is a sufficient memorandum under the Statute of Frauds which, as it now reads (Personal Property Law, § 85), requires only the signature of the party to be charged, etc.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the City Court of the city of New York, setting aside the verdict of a jury in his favor and granting a new trial.

I. Gainsburg (Joseph P. Segal, of counsel), for appellant.

Benjamin Frindel (Robert L. Turk, of counsel), for respondent.

Bijur, J.

The issues of fact having been found in plaintiff’s favor the only question presented by this appeal is whether the contract of sale on which plaintiff sued was invalidated by non-compliance with the Statute of Frauds. It need not be decided whether there was such an “ acceptance ” of the goods as to remove the case from the statute because in my opinion the memorandum ivas ‘ ‘ signed by the party to be charged or his agent in that behalf ” as required by the Personal Property Laiv, section 85.

It is conceded that at the time of the purchase either the defendant or his fully authorized agent delivered to plaintiff a bill which contained the full description *506and price of the goods sold under the printed name of defendant, and which was filled out at their direction on the typewriter, describing the goods as *“*sold to L. G. Gangel [plaintiff’s assignor] New York City.”

The statute as it now reads requires only a signature and not a subscription to the memorandum. It lias been held for years in England under a similar statute .that the name of the party to be charged, printed upon a bill or similar instrument, which inscription is at the time of the sale “ appropriated ” or “ assigned ” by the party to this particular transaction, is a sufficient signature. *Saunderson*v. *Jackson, 3*Esp. 180 (1799), (Lord Eldon), frequently cited with approval, as for example in *Schneider*v. *Norris,*2 Maulé *&*S. 286 (1814), (Lord Ellenborough); *Evans*v. *Hoare,*1 Q. B. 593, 596 (1892); *Hucklesby*v. *Hook,*82 L. T. 117 (1900). See also *James*v. *Patten,*6 N. Y. 15; *Goldowitz*v. *Kupfer & Co., 80*Misc. Rep. 487.

Order reversed and verdict reinstated, with costs to appellant.

Guy and Mullah, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, with costs to appellant.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-14-041]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

December 15, 2014 at 11:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agendas for future meetings: None.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701-TA-512 and 731-TA-1248 (Final) (Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from China). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on December 26, 2014.

5. Outstanding action jackets: None.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission:

Issued: December 5, 2014.

William R. Bishop,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2014-29040 Filed 12-8-14; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated condensed financial statements for the six-months ended November
30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,509,002
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  418,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    965,655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,993,281
<PP&E>                                         868,050
<DEPRECIATION>                               (361,514)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,197,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,083,133
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,085
<COMMON>                                        48,917
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,719,121
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,197,756
<SALES>                                        792,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               792,100
<CGS>                                          573,790
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  573,790
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,105,683
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,337
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,894,710)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,894,710)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,894,710)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28932]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


The Centers for Disease Control (CDC)/Health Resources and 
Services Administration (HRSA) Advisory Committee on HIV, Viral 
Hepatitis and STD Prevention and Treatment; Notice of Charter Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the CDC/HRSA Advisory Committee on 
HIV, Viral Hepatitis and STD Prevention and Treatment, Department of 
Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through 
November 25, 2016.
    Contact Person for More Information: Johnathan Mermin, M.D., 
M.P.H., Designated Federal Officer, CDC/HRSA Advisory Committee on HIV, 
Viral Hepatitis and STD Prevention and Treatment, Department of Health 
and Human Services, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE., Mailstop E07, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30333, telephone (404) 639-8000 or fax (404) 639-8600.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Claudette Grant,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2014-28932 Filed 12-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P