alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Microvision, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

1)  the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements and
   of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

2)   the information contained in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | /s/ALEXANDER Y. TOKMAN
    Alexander Y. Tokman
    Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 15, 2007

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4579 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4579

To modify the boundary of the Harry S Truman National Historic Site in 
             the State of Missouri, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2004

  Ms. McCarthy of Missouri (for herself, Mr. Skelton, and Mr. Blunt) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To modify the boundary of the Harry S Truman National Historic Site in 
             the State of Missouri, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This section may be cited as the ``Truman Farm Home Expansion 
Act''.

SEC. 2. HARRY S TRUMAN NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.

    The first section of Public Law 98-32 (16 U.S.C. 461 note) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
    ``(d) Acquisition of Additional Land.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may acquire, by donation, 
        purchase with donated or appropriated funds, transfer from 
        another Federal agency, or any other means, the land described 
        in paragraph (2) for inclusion in the Harry S Truman National 
        Historic Site.
            ``(2) Description of land.--The land referred to in 
        paragraph (1) consists of the approximately 5 acres of land 
        (including the structure located south of the Truman Farm Home 
        site), as generally depicted on the map entitled `Harry S 
        Truman National Historic Site Proposed Boundary', numbered 492/
        80,027, and dated April 17, 2003.
            ``(3) Boundary modification.--On acquisition of the land 
        under this subsection, the Secretary shall modify the boundary 
        of the Harry S Truman National Historic Site to reflect the 
        acquisition of the land.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 4.45


 


Deed of access, indemnity and
insurance – Mr Ahmed Fahour


 


The
Deed of access, indemnity and insurance of Mr Ahmed Fahour is incorporated by
reference to National Australia Bank Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Commission
on January 20, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28810]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9920-25-Region 6]


Underground Injection Control Program; Hazardous Waste Injection 
Restrictions; Reissuance of a Petition for Exemption--Class I Hazardous 
Waste Injection; Pergan Marshall, LLC Marshall, TX

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of a final decision on a no migration petition 
reissuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a reissuance of an exemption to 
the land disposal Restrictions, under the 1984 Hazardous and Solid 
Waste Amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, has 
been denied to Pergan Marshall, LLC for two Class I injection wells 
located at Marshall, TX. The company was unable to demonstrate to the 
satisfaction of the Environmental Protection Agency by the petition 
reissuance application and supporting documentation that, to a 
reasonable degree of certainty, there would be no migration of 
hazardous constituents from the injection zone for as long as the waste 
remains hazardous. This final decision prohibits the underground 
injection by Pergan, of restricted hazardous wastes, into Class I 
hazardous waste injection wells WDW-180 and WDW-243. A public notice 
was issued October 2, 2014. The public comment period closed on 
November 18, 2014. No comments were received. This decision constitutes 
final Agency action and there is no Administrative appeal. This 
decision may be reviewed/appealed in compliance with the Administrative 
Procedure Act.

DATES: This action is effective as of November 24, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the petition reissuance and all pertinent 
information relating thereto are on file at the following location: 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Water Quality Protection 
Division, Source Water Protection Branch (6WQ-S), 1445 Ross Avenue, 
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Dellinger, Chief Ground Water/
UIC Section, EPA--Region 6, telephone (214) 665-8324.

    Dated: November 24, 2014.
William K. Honker,
Director, Water Quality Protection Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-28810 Filed 12-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

Mid-State Raceway, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Hoolae Paoa, Chief Executive Officer of Mid-State Raceway, Inc. and
Subsidiary (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.       The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
         December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
         of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: April 14, 2004

/s/ Hoolae Paoa
Hoolae Paoa
Chief Executive Officer
Heterogeneous Fog Communications 

and Computing for Resilience

Architecture Cognitive Mobile HetNet

“Take Your Network and Cloud”

Brookline PD Testbed

www.spectronn.com
Exhibit 32(b)

                 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of Jordan
Industries, Inc., an Illinois corporation (the "Registrant"), hereby certifies
that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended
March 31, 2005, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. Section 78m(a)) and that the information contained in the Quarterly
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: December 14, 2005

/s/  Norman R. Bates
---------------------------------------
Norman R. Bates
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President
and Assistant Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income  Partners  1988-A,  Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         391,523
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  92,782
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               484,305
<PP&E>                                         9,581,903
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,617,836)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,454,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          41,720
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,375,944
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,454,824
<SALES>                                        141,586
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,596
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  114,420<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (13,282)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13,282)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,282)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### P. L. Lane *v.*James Breeden et al.

Vendor and Purchaser — Vendor’s Lien — Pleading.

A complaint to enforce a vendor’s lien, wliicli fails to allege how the land was sold, whether by parol, by bond or by deed, and makes no statement from which the court can infer that a lien had been retained by the vendor, is insufficient.

*222APPEAL ER.OM GRANT CIRCUIT COURT.

October 21, 1873.

*Fisk, Green, for appellant.*

*Drane, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

We deem it unnecessary to allude to the evidence affecting the rights of these parties. Lane is insisting upon his right to enforce what in an agreement he designated as a lien upon the land sold by Brumback .to Breeden. The pleading upon which he seeks to enforce this lien is obviously defective; he fails to allege how this land was sold .to Ashcraft, whether in parol, by bond, or deed, and- makes no statement from which this court can infer that a lien was retained by the vendor. It is alleged that the notes were given for the purchase-money for the land. The petition of Lane must contain all the allegations made necessary in an original petition to enforce vendors’ liens', and particularly should it be so, when a third party asserts his claim as purchaser. If Lane had filed this petition against Ashcraft and Brumback to enforce this lien a judgment by default could not have been rendered, as there is no allegation showing that a lien existed or that any was retained. Ashcraft is not responsible personally, as the land was redelivered to Brumback by the consent of the attorney of Lane, in order that Brumback might use it to pay that debt.

The judgment below is affirmed.
#### W. G. Deshazer *v.*Commercial Bank et al.

Appeal — Subsequent Setting Aside of Judgment.

Where, after an appeal lias been taken from a judgment, tke subsequent setting aside of the judgment on motion will not affect the appeal.

APPEAL FROM MERCER CIRCUIT COURT.

February 25, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

From the judgment now complained of by appellant, an appeal was prosecuted to this court by Jesse Deshazer, and the judgment reversed as to him (Manuscript Opinion 1872), and after this appeal- was taken, and the mandate entered in the other appeal, ap-pellee, at the November term, 1873, of the court below, moved said court to set aside said judgment. That motion was sustained and the judgment set aside; and it is now insisted that as the judgment from which the appeal was prosecuted has been set aside, there no longer exists any judgment, and consequently there is nothing to appeal from. When.the appeal was sued out there was a judgment against appellant, and though void, it affected his rights; and being prejudicial to him he had a right to resort fi> this court for *527redress, as was held by this court in Ruby v. Grace, 2 Deval 540, and in subsequent cases; and the subsequent order setting aside that judgment did not divest him of that right.

*C. A. Hardin, J. B. Thompson, for appellant.*

*J. B. and P. B. Thompson, for appellees.*

The judgment against appellant was void because there was no service of process, actual or constructive, and no appearance by him. in the case. Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2299

RANDY BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:05-cv00114-RWT)

Submitted: July 25, 2007 Decided: August 22, 2007

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Sheldon Lewis Gnatt, KNIGHT, MANZI,

NUSSBAUM & LAPLACA, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Randy Brown appeals the district court’s order granting

the Prince George’s County Board of Education’s Motion to Enforce

Settlement Agreement and denying Brown’s Motion to Set Aside

Settlement Agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Brown v. Prince George’s County Bd. of Educ.,

No. 8:05-cv-00114-RWT (D. Md. filed Nov. 9, 2006 & entered Nov. 13,

2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
MAYTAG CORPORATION

                                   Exhibit 12

               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

                                     <PAGE>


                             MAYTAG CORPORATION
                                 Exhibit 12
             Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
              (Amounts in thousands of dollars except ratios)


                                      Year Ended December 31
                         1996       1995        1994       1993       1992

Consolidated pretax
  income from
  continuing
  operations before
  minority interest
  extraordinary
  item and
  cumulative effect
  of accounting       $ 228,237  $  59,804   $ 241,337  $  89,870  $   7,546
  changes

Interest expense         43,006     52,087      74,077     75,364     75,004

Depreciation of
  capitalized             1,553      1,695       1,772      1,546        933
  interest

Interest portion of
rental expense            6,448      8,789      10,722     10,480     11,264

Earnings              $ 279,244  $ 122,375   $ 327,908  $ 177,260  $  94,747


Interest expense      $  43,006  $  52,087   $  74,077  $  75,364  $  75,004

Interest capitalized      8,905      2,534         547      1,484      3,886

Interest portion of
rental expense            6,448      8,789      10,722     10,480     11,264

Fixed charges         $  58,359  $  85,346   $  85,346  $  87,328  $  90,154


Ratio of earnings to
fixed charges              4.78       1.93        3.84       2.03       1.05

<PAGE>
Specimen common share certificate



 Exhibit 4.1 
  
 [Front] 
  
 Share Certificate Representing Common Shares 
 of 
 [Pixelplus Co., Ltd.] 
  
 [    ]th Issuance 
  
 Certificate No.: 
  
 One Share 
  
 Five Hundred Won 
  

			
		
	 1. Name of Issuer:
	    	Pixelplus Co., Ltd.
		
	 1. Date of Incorporation of Issuer:
	    	 
		
	 1. Number of Authorized Shares:
	    	 
		
	 1. Par Value:
	    	500 Won
		
	 1. Type of Shares:
	    	Common Shares in Registered Form
		
	 1. Issuance Date:
	    	 

  
 This share certificate has been issued
and delivered to the shareholder whose name appeared hereinbelow to certify that such shareholder is the holder of one common share of the Issuer in accordance with the articles of incorporation of the Issuer. 
  
 Pixelplus Co., Ltd. 
 Representative Director Seo Kyu Lee 
  
 [            ] 







 [Back] 
  

											
	To: [Shareholder]

	  	Date of
Issuance

	  	 	  	 
	Date of
Entry

	  	Name of
Shareholder

	  	 Witness of
 Entry

	  	Date of
Entry

	  	Name of
Shareholder

	  	Witness of
Entry


						
	 ̈	  	 	  	 	  	 ̈	  	 	  	 
						
	 ̈	  	 	  	 	  	 ̈	  	 	  	 
						
	 ̈	  	 	  	 	  	 ̈	  	 	  	 
						
	 ̈	  	 	  	 	  	 ̈	  	 	  	 

  
 Please do not make any marks or
otherwise taint the portion below as it will be computer processed.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4217 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4217

  To amend title 32, United States Code, to rename the National Guard 
  Challenge Program as the National Guard Youth Challenge Program, to 
increase the maximum Federal share of the costs of State programs under 
  the National Youth Guard Challenge Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2004

 Mr. Wilson of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, 
    Mr. John, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Case, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. Green of 
   Wisconsin, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Baker, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Walden of 
 Oregon, Mrs. Capito, Mr. McCrery, and Mr. Young of Alaska) introduced 
   the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 32, United States Code, to rename the National Guard 
  Challenge Program as the National Guard Youth Challenge Program, to 
increase the maximum Federal share of the costs of State programs under 
  the National Youth Guard Challenge Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL GUARD YOUTH CHALLENGE PROGRAM.

    (a) Maximum Federal Share of Costs of State Programs.--Subsection 
(d) of section 509 of title 32, United States Code, is amended to read 
as follows:
    ``(d) Matching Funds Required.--The amount of assistance provided 
under this section to a State program of the National Guard Youth 
Challenge Program may not exceed--
            ``(1) for fiscal year 2005, 65 percent of the costs of 
        operating the State program during that year;
            ``(2) for fiscal year 2006, 70 percent of the costs of 
        operating the State program during that year;
            ``(3) for fiscal year 2007 and each subsequent fiscal year, 
        75 percent of the costs of operating the State program during 
        that year.''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Subsection (b)(2) of such 
section is amended by striking ``in fiscal year 2001 or 2002 may not 
exceed $62,500,000'' and inserting ``in fiscal year 2005 may not exceed 
$82,593,200''.
    (c) Redesignation of Program.--Such section is further amended by 
striking ``National Guard Challenge Program'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``National Guard Youth Challenge Program''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 2014)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 71619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28481]



[[Page 71617]]

Vol. 79

Tuesday,

No. 231

December 2, 2014

Part IV





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Presidential Determination No. 2015-02 of November 21, 2014--
Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 79 , No. 231 / Tuesday, December 2, 2014 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 71619]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2015-02 of November 21, 
                2014

                
Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 
                1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National Defense 
                Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary 
                of the Treasury[, and] the Secretary of Energy

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States, after 
                carefully considering the report submitted to the 
                Congress by the Energy Information Administration on 
                October 30, 2014, and other relevant factors, including 
                global economic conditions, increased oil production by 
                certain countries, and the level of spare capacity, I 
                determine, pursuant to section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of 
                the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
                2012, Public Law 112-81, and consistent with my prior 
                determinations, that there is a sufficient supply of 
                petroleum and petroleum products from countries other 
                than Iran to permit a significant reduction in the 
                volume of petroleum and petroleum products purchased 
                from Iran by or through foreign financial institutions.

                I will continue to monitor this situation closely.

                The Secretary of State is hereby authorized and 
                directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 
                Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, November 21, 2014

[FR Doc. 2014-28481
Filed 12-1-14; 11:15 am]
Billing code 4710-10
Affiliate Members

October 2023

AFFILIATE

Michael King
</title>
<!-- Licensed to: PublicEase, Inc.-->
<!-- Document Created using EDGARIZER HTML 3.0.1.3 -->
<!-- Copyright 2005 EDGARfilings, Ltd., an IEC company.-->
<!-- All rights reserved EDGARfilings.com -->
</head>