alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Grizzard *v.*Ford *et al.*

No. 6865.

December 14, 1928.

Gilbert, J.

This was an equitable proceeding for injunction, accounting, dissolution of a copartnership, and receiver. Upon the hearing, after the appointment of a receiver and a report by him, the plaintiff moved to dismiss the proceeding, which the court did. The court’s order adjudged that the costs of the ease, including the receiver’s fees of $100, be taxed equally against the plaintiff and the defendant. The defendant excepted on the ground that when a plaintiff dismisses or abandons his own ease, all costs should be taxed against him, and that the court was without power to order otherwise. *Held:*

1. “In all civil cases in any of the courts of this State (except as provided for by this Code), the party who shall discontinue, fail, or be cast in such suit shall be liable for the costs thereof.” Civil Code (1910), § 5980.

2. An exception to the above-stated rule is provided for equitable proceedings in the Civil Code (1910), § 5423, as follows: “Special verdicts may be found by the jury, and they may recommend to the court the assessment of costs upon the respective parties. *It is the province of ■ the judge, however, to determine upon whom the costs shall fall.”*

*3.*“Costs do not always in chancery follow the event of the cause. They rest in the sound discretion of the court.” *Pearce*v. *Chastain,*3 *Ga.*226 (4) (46 Am. D. 423). This discretion must not be exercised in an arbitrary manner. *Hamilton*v. *DuPre,*103 *Ga.*795 (30 S. E. 248); *Lowe*v. *Byrd,*148 *Ga.*388, 393 (96 S. B. 1001); *Lane*v. *Tarver,*153 *Ga.*570 (2) 585 (113 S. E. 452). The discretion of the judge will not be controlled by this court, unless it is manifestly abused. *Guernsey*v. *Phinizy,*113 *Ga.*898 (3) (39 S. E. 402, 84 Am. St. R. 270).

4. In view of the receiver’s report, not contradicted, in which the defendant was shown to have frustrated all efforts to salvage partnership assets, the discretion of the court in taxing the costs of the case equally between the plaintiff and the defendant will not be controlled.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*532
      *Noah J. 8Lone,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. R. Dorsey, Jones, Evins, Moore & Powers, Ralph Williams, Cecil R. Hall,*and *Clinton Cox,*contra.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOHN SCHEFFLER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 706 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
10688.

#### Tate *v.*The State.

Decided October 14, 1919.

Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Macon—Judge Guerry. June 10, 1919.

*Wallace Miller,*for plaintiff in error.

*Will Gunn, solicitor,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

1. A motion to quash an accusation is merely a demurrer to the accusation. *Thomasson*v. *State,*22 *Ga.*499.

2. An accusation is not demurrable for any matter dehors the pleadings and the record. *Jackson*v. *State,*64 *Ga.*344.

3. Under the above rulings the court did not err in striking the motion to quash the accusation.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luhe and Bloodioorth, JJ., concur.*
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




	 	 	 	 	 
	Time Warner Inc.

One Time Warner Center

New York, NY 10019

	 	America Online, Inc.

22000 AOL Way

Dulles, VA 20166
	 	Aspen Investments LLC

Atlantis Investments LLC

c/o Finser Corporation

550 Biltmore Way, Suite 900

Coral Gables, FL 33134
	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 
	 	 	 	November 29, 2005






America Online Latin America, Inc.


6600 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 400


Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309



Ladies and Gentlemen:



Reference is made to that certain letter agreement dated as of June 23, 2005 (the “Plan
Support Agreement”), among America Online Latin America, Inc. (“AOLA”), Time Warner
Inc. (“TW”), America Online, Inc. (“AOL”; and together with TW, the “TW
Parties”) and Aspen Investments LLC and Atlantis Investments LLC (collectively, “ODC”),
as amended by that certain letter agreement dated as of September 28, 2005, setting forth certain
terms and conditions pursuant to which AOLA and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries
will propose their joint chapter 11 plan of liquidation on a consensual basis with the support of
TW, AOL and ODC. Capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Plan Support Agreement.



The TW Parties and ODC agree that the Plan Support Agreement shall be amended in the following
respects: (i) “December 15, 2005” shall be substituted for “November 30, 2005” in paragraph 7(i) of
the Plan Support Agreement; and (ii) “April 15, 2006” shall be substituted for “March 31, 2006” in
paragraph 7(ii) of the Plan Support Agreement.



Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan Support Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.



Kindly acknowledge your agreement to the above-described amendments to the Plan Support Agreement
by counter-signing this letter agreement and returning an executed copy of the same to TW, AOL and
ODC.

1


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this letter agreement to be executed
and delivered by their respective duly authorized officers, solely in their respective capacity as
officers of the undersigned and not in any other capacity, as of the date first above written.




TIME WARNER INC.




By: /s/ Katherine A. Brown

Name: Katherine A. Brown

Title: SVP, Mergers and Acquistions





AMERICA ONLINE, INC.




By: /s/ Steve Swad

Name: Steve Swad

Title: CFO





ASPEN INVESTMENTS LLC




By: /s/ Cristina Pieretti

Name: Cristina Pieretti

Title: Executive Vice President





ATLANTIS INVESTMENTS LLC




By: /s/ Cristina Pieretti

Name: Cristina Pieretti

Title: Executive Vice President





ACCEPTED AND AGREED:




AMERICA ONLINE LATIN AMERICA,


INC.




By: /s/ Charles Herington

Name: Charles Herington

Title: President





AOL PUERTO RICO MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.




By: /s/ Mario Martín Lanzoni

Name: Mario Martín Lanzoni

Title: Treasurer





AMERICA ONLINE CARIBBEAN


BASIN, INC.




By: /s/ Osvaldo Baños

Name: Osvaldo Baños

Title: President





AOL LATIN AMERICA


MANAGEMENT LLC




By: America Online Latin America, Inc., its sole member




By: /s/ Charles Herington

Name: Charles Herington

Title: President





2
Methane Sorption in a Family of qzd-MOFs: 

A Multiscale Computational Study

Mikhail Suyetin, Maxim V. Peskov, Udo Schwingenschlögl

Suyetin, M., Peskov, M. V., Schwingenschlögl, U. Methane Sorption in a Family of qzd-MOFs: 

A Multiscale Computational Study. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2020, 123296. 

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123296
Organic linkers used to obtain a series of qzdMOFs. White, grey, and red spheres denote H, 

C, and O atoms, respectively

BB framework of qzd topology.

Suyetin, M., Peskov, M. V., Schwingenschlögl, U. Methane Sorption in a Family of qzd-MOFs: 

A Multiscale Computational Study. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2020, 123296. 

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123296
CH4 model

Atom type σj(Å) εj/kB(K) q (e)

United 3.73 148 0

Atom type σi(Å) εi/kB(K)

C 3.473 47.856

O 3.033 48.158

H 2.846 7.649

Cu 3.114 2.516

MOF model:Dreiding Force Field, Universal Force Field
Functional Materials Design, 

Discovery and Development

BB framework of qzd topology.

Comparison of experimental and simulated 

methane sorption isotherms for state-of-the-art 

MOFs. 
Methane sorption isotherms of the computationally designed MOFs with qzd topology.
Functional Materials Design, 

Discovery and Development

Total methane uptake and

working capacity

at 35 bar, 65 bar, or 80 bar

and 298 K. 
Total methane uptake and working capacity of the computationally designed qzd-MOFs and 

outstanding MOFs from the literature at 65 bar and 273 K or 240 K.
|   | 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |   |                                       |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
| Date:       November 8, 2010 |   |                                       |   |
|                              |   |                                       |   |
|                              | By:    | /s/ Andre      Scholz                 |   |
|                              |   | Andre      Scholz                          |   |
|                              |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                              |   | (principal      executive officer)         |   |

|                              |   |                                                                     |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:       November 8, 2010 |   |                                                                     |   |
|                              |   |                                                                     |   |
|                              | By:    | /s/ Craig      Cody                                                 |   |
|                              |   | Craig      Cody                                                          |   |
|                              |   | Chief      Financial Officer                                             |   |
|                              |   | (principal      financial officer and principal accounting      officer) |   |

----
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report included in this Form 10-KSB into SpectraLink
Corporation's previously filed Form S-8, File Nos. 333-4650 and 333-30225.


/s/  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Denver, Colorado,
  March 18, 1998.





   
                                       21
README.txt for NIST ARC, v. 0.98 (Beta)

This file was downloaded from: https://www.nist.gov/services-resources/software/nist-arc-nist-alternatives-resilient-communities-tool

Setup Instructions
1. Install Anaconda
- [ ] Visit https://www.anaconda.com/products/individual
- [ ] Identify the installer that is designed for your operating system, ie, Window, Linux or macOS
- [ ] Download and run the installer
2. Retrieve and open the NIST_ARC_Installation notebook (.ipynb) file
- [ ] In the Windows/Linux/macOS start menu, locate and open an 'Anaconda prompt' command prompt window
- [ ] Type at the prompt the following two commands. The first retrieves the installation notebook and the second opens it.

             curl -o NIST_ARC.zip https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2022/10/19/NIST_ARC_Installation.ipynb

             jupyter notebook NIST_ARC_Installation

3. This will open an installation notebook in your browser.  Follow the instructions in the notebook to complete the installation.
Exhibit 13.1**CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of section 1350, Chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officersof Mitsui & Co., Ltd. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that theCompany’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date:September 26, 2005        By  /s/ Shoei Utsuda   Name:  Shoei Utsuda   Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)      By  /s/ Kazuya Imai   Name:  Kazuya Imai   Title:  Senior Executive Managing Officerand Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 31.2.  CERTIFICATION  I, S. E. Parks, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report of Questar Gas Company on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2007;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. [intentionally omitted];  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    November 6, 2008 /s/S. E. Parks S. E. Parks Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Union & Planters’ Bank & Trust Co. *v.*Elder.

Opinion delivered April 16, 1928.

Appeal and error — judgment on supersedeas bond. — On affirming a judgment for a certain proportion of the assets in the hands of a receiver, the judgment *on*the supersedeas bond should not he for a specific sum, hut should fix liability and remand the case wiith directions to ascertain the amount of such liability.

Appeal from Prairie Chancery Court; *Frank E. Bodge,*Chancellor;

judgment modified.

*Emmet Vaughan,*for appellant.

*Daggett & Daggett,*for appellees.

Humphreys, J.

This case was affirmed *(Purvis*v. *Elder,*175 Ark. 780, 1 S. W. (2d.) 36), whereupon appellee moved for judgment on the supersedeas bond, which was granted. In keeping with the order, the clerk of this court entered a judgment for $2,592, using as his guide the amount shown by the receiver’s report in the record. The judgment rendered in the trial court was not for a specific sum. Our attention has been called to the fact that the judgment was not for a specific amount but for a portion of the assets in the hands of the receiver, and that the receiver’s report appearing in the record was not his final report but, on the contrary, was his first report, which did not show all legal disbursements. In view of this fact it was error to enter a judgment here for a specific sum on the supersedeas bond, *1141but tbe same should have fixed the liability on the bond, and the ease should have been remanded with direction that the amount thereof be ascertained by the trial court ■after allowing* the receiver such amounts as have been paid out >by him on order o'f the trial court.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40604

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID BRYAN SPRATT,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:94-CR-29-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 19, 1996

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Bryan Spratt appeals his sentence in a conviction for

conspiracy to manufacture and possess marijuana with intent to

distribute and possession with intent to distribute a controlled

substance. The district court did not err in increasing his

offense level for obstruction of justice or in declining to

decrease his offense level for acceptance of responsibility. See

United States v. Graves, 5 F.3d 1546, 1555 (5th Cir. 1993), cert.

denied, 114 S. Ct. 1829 (1994); United States v. McCord, 33 F.3d 

1434, 1454 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 2558 (1995). 

The motion to substitute counsel on appeal is DENIED. 

 AFFIRMED.
10356.

#### Hatcher Company *v.*Foster, solicitor.

Smith, J.

In a statutory proceeding to condemn a vehicle illegally employed in the transportation of intoxicating liquors, where the owner of the vehicle had conditionally sold it, but, under the terms of a series of notes given in payment for the vehicle, title was in each note reserved in the vendor until full payment of the purchase-money should be made, the mere fact that none of the notes except the last one of the series had been attested as required by law or *431recorded would not defeat the seller’s claim of title under his reservation. See *Shrouder*v. *Sweat,*148 *Ga.*378 (96 S. E. 881); *Whites*v. *State,*23 *Ga. App.*174 (98 S. E. 171); *Armington*v. *State,*ante, 75 (100 S. E. 15). Therefore the court (who was acting both as judge and jury) erred in holding that because of this omission none of the notes except the last one of the series constituted a lien on the vehicle.

Decided November 19, 1919.

Condemnation; from city court of Madison—Judge Anderson. January *22,*1919.

*Williford & Lambert,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. G. Foster, solicitor,*contra.

2. There was no evidence produced on the trial tending to show that the vendor participated in the criminal enterprise or had any notice that the vehicle was to be used in the transportation of intoxicating liquor.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jenlcins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
Webinar Series

Top Ten Ways to Discover a Cybersecurity Career That Is Right for You

February 17, 2021
New NICE Working Groups

These groups will contribute to the 

development of an overall Implementation Plan 

that addresses a particular goal and 

associated objectives that are contained in 

the NICE Strategic Plan.

Join a Working Group:

nist.gov/nice/community
NICE Strategic Plan Goal

2

Goal #1: Promote the Discovery of Cybersecurity Careers and Multiple Pathways


#10 COVID Vaccines Are Not the Only Thing in Short Supply 

5
Ready. Set. Wait? 

6

#9
#8 There is More on the Menu than Dessert! 

7
“What’s in your Wallet?” 

8

#7
Be a “Curious George” 

9

#6
Connect the Dots 

10

#5
Find the Cheese in the Credential Maze 

11

#4
Impressions are Not Just for Mime Artists 

12

#3
Passion is for More Than Lovers

13

#2
The Blues are for Jazz Lovers 

14

#1
#10 –

#9 – R

COVID Vaccines Are Not the Only Thing in Short Supply 

#8 – T

eady. Set. Wait? 

#7 – “

here is More on the Menu than Dessert! 

#6 –

What’s in your Wallet?” 

B

#5 – C

e 

o

#4 – Fin

#3 – Im

a “Curious George” 

nnect the Dots 

d the Cheese in the Credential Maze 

#2 – Pa

#1 – Th

pressions are Not Just for Mime Artists 

ssion is for More Than Lovers

e Blues are for Jazz Lovers 

15

Summary
16

Q & A 

Gerald Auger, Phd

• Gerald Auger, PhD (LI)

• @Gerald_Auger (TW)

• Simplycyber.io (Wb)

• Gerald Auger – Simply Cyber (YT)

• gerald_auger (CH)
17

NICE Strategic Plan Goal

Goal #1: Promote the Discovery of Cybersecurity Careers and Multiple Pathways
Thank You for Joining Us!

Upcoming Webinar: Advancing Skills-Based Education and 

Hiring Through the Open Skills Network

When: March 17, 2021

Register: 

https://nist-nice.adobeconnect.com/webinarmar2021/event/registration.html

nist.gov/nice/webinars

18
PMI Complex Test Case 3

Includes Atomic Test Cases - 6, 13, 14, 20, 27, 32, 36, 39, 45, 46

 Models - 2012

Rev C

r

e

nist_ctc_03_asme1_rc
11072.

#### Floding *v.*American Machinery Company.

Decided February 10, 1920.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Pendleton. September 25, 1919.

*Westmoreland & Smith,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. 8. Dillon, C. M. Lancaster,*contra.

Smith, J.

There was evidence to support the finding of the judge of the municipal court of Atlanta, who tried the case without a jury; and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari, .based on the general grounds only.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenhins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*