alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4477 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4477

To amend the Uniform Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 
  1994 to require employers to post a notice of the rights and duties 
                       that apply under that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 2, 2004

Mr. McGovern (for himself, Mr. Bradley of New Hampshire, and Mr. Evans) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Uniform Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 
  1994 to require employers to post a notice of the rights and duties 
                       that apply under that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Patriotic Employer Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR EMPLOYERS TO POST NOTICE OF RIGHTS AND DUTIES 
              UNDER USERRA.

    (a) Notice.--Chapter 43 of title 38, United States Code, is amended 
by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 4334. Notice of rights and duties
    ``(a) Requirement to Post Notice.--Each employer shall post in a 
conspicuous place in the place of employment for persons entitled to 
rights and benefits under this chapter a notice of the rights, 
benefits, and obligations of such persons and such employers under this 
chapter.
    ``(b) Content of Notice.--The Secretary shall provide to employers 
the text of the notice to be provided under this section.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``4334. Notice of rights and duties.''.
    (c) Implementation.--(1) Not later than the date that is 90 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Labor 
shall make available to employers the notice required under section 
4334 of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a).
    (2) The amendments made by this section shall apply to employers 
under chapter 43 of such title on and after the first date referred to 
in paragraph (1).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10(ii)

                                  BILL OF SALE

By these presents, Melvin Fields, a Florida resident does hereby acknowledge the
sale and transfer for good and valuable  consideration,  the receipt of which is
hereby  acknowledged,  all of his rights,  ownership  and interest in and to the
Nevada Limited Liability  Company known as Oasis Fields,  L.L.C. to Professional
Wrestling Alliance  Corporation,  ( a Delaware  corporation),  said transfers to
include any and all rights of  ownership,  transfer  and use  presently  held by
Melvin  Fields  and or  Oasis  Fields,  L.L.C..  Payment  in full  for the  sale
represented  by this Bill of Sale has been  received  prior to the execution and
delivery hereof to Professional  Wrestling Alliance  Corporation.  Melvin Fields
represents that he has been the sole and only member of Oasis Fields L.L.C. from
the date of its formation through the date hereof.

         Dated this 25th Day of March 2000.

         Melvin Fields, Sole Member of Oasis Fields, L.L.C.


                   /s/ Melvin Fields
                  ------------------------
                  Melvin Fields

                                                                     EXHIBIT "A"
                                       14


<PAGE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4273

_____________________________
W ILLIAM E. D UNCAN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court fo r Escambia County

. Gary L. Bergosh , Judge

.
June 13 , 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , R AY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 William E. Duncan, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### Bennett, Appellee, *v.*The Dayton Memorial Park *&*Cemetery Assn. et al., Appellees; Ohio Liquidating Co., Appellant.

(No. 2070

Decided November 2, 1949.)

*Mr. Howard P. Williamson,*for appellee Clifford R. Bennett.

*Messrs. 'Cowden, Pfarrer & Crew,*for appellee The Winters National Bank & Trust Company.

*Messrs. Prong & Prong,*for appellant.

Wiseman, J.

This case is submitted on motion of the defendant, appellee, The Winters National Bank & Trust. Company of Dayton, to dismiss the appeal of the Ohio Liquidating Company.

The motion is grounded on the fact that the Ohio Liquidating Company was substituted as a party to the action in the place of the Stockholders Realization Corporation by entry made by the Common Pleas Court after judgment was entered. The entry pro*124vided that the order of substitution should be entered *nunc pro tunc*as of November 7, 1944, which was prior to the date of the judgment.

The contention of counsel for the bank is that only parties to the action are entitled to file an appeal from a judgment; that the judgment terminates the action; that any attempt on the part of the court to substitute a party after judgment is a nullity and that such substituted party has no right to take an appeal from the judgment. Counsel also contends that Section 11261, General Code, which provides for substitution of parties, gives the court authority to make substitution only while the action is pending and prior to judgment. We do not agree. Section 11261, General Code, in part provides as follows: “On any other transfer of interest, the action may be continued in the name of the original party, or the court may allow the person to whom the transfer is made to be substituted for him.” There is no time limitation mentioned in this section within which the court may act. But we are also required to observe the provisions of Section 11363, General Code, which provides, in part, as follows: “Before or after judgment, in furtherance of justice and on such terms as it deems proper, the court may amend any pleading, process, or proceeding, by adding or striking out the name of any party * * *.” Under this section an amendment which is allowable may be made at any stage of the proceedings. It may be made after judgment as well as before judgment. However, after judgment the court should exercise its authority with caution in furtherance of justice. It therefore becomes immaterial that the entry substituting the Ohio Liquidating Company for the Stockholders Realization Corporation was entered *nunc pro tunc.*In support of the proposition that the court may exercise such power under Section 11363, General *125Code, after judgment, the court cites the following authorities: *Henry*v. *Jeans,*48 Ohio St., 443, 28 N. E., 672; *Industrial Gas Co.*v. *Jones,*62 Ohio App., 553, 24 N. E. (2d), 830; 30 Ohio Jurisprudence, 800, Parties, Sections 71, 73; 31 Ohio Jurisprudence, 944, Pleadings, Sections 338, 339, 348.

Motion to dismiss will be overruled.

*Motion overruled.*

Miller, P. J., and Hornbbck, J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4569 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4569

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
 To provide for the development of a national plan for the control and 
management of Sudden Oak Death, a tree disease caused by the fungus-like 
         pathogen Phytophthora ramorum, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL PLAN FOR CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT OF SUDDEN OAK 
              DEATH.

    (a) Development of National Plan.--Subject to the availability of 
appropriated funds for this purpose, the Secretary of Agriculture, 
acting through the Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service, shall 
develop a national plan for the control and management of Sudden Oak 
Death, a forest disease caused by the fungus-like pathogen Phytophthora 
ramorum.
    (b) Plan Elements.--In developing the plan, the Secretary shall 
specifically address the following:
        (1) Information derived by the Department of Agriculture from 
    ongoing efforts to identify hosts of Phytophthora ramorum and 
    survey the extent to which Sudden Oak Death exists in the United 
    States.
        (2) Past and current efforts to understand the risk posed by 
    Phytophthora ramorum and the results of control and management 
    efforts regarding Sudden Oak Death, including efforts related to 
    research, control, quarantine, and hazardous fuel reduction.
        (3) Such future efforts as the Secretary considers necessary to 
    control and manage Sudden Oak Death, including cost estimates for 
    the implementation of such efforts.
    (c) Consultation.--The Secretary shall develop the plan in 
consultation with other Federal agencies that have appropriate 
expertise regarding the control and management of Sudden Oak Death.
    (d) Implementation of Plan.--The Secretary shall complete the plan 
and commence implementation as soon as practicable after the date on 
which funds are first appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in subsection (e) to carry out this section.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary such sums as may be necessary to carry 
out this section.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly report of Entropin, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the
      capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      November 15, 2005




By:
            /s/
                David
                NorrisDavid
                NorrisChief
                Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, or othr document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise
      adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
      of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
      Entropin, Inc. and will be retained by Entropin, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





22
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 20, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134850 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134850 COA: 268084 Jackson CC: 05-007065-FH ANTWAIN DEANJELO PRINCE, a/k/a ANTUAN DEANJELO PRINCE, a/k/a ANTUAIN DEANGELO PRINCE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1213 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 20, 2007

Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6894

CHARLES FRANCIS GRAHAM,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

THEODIS BECK,

Respondent - Appellee,

and

FREDERICK HUBBARD,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-00149-RJC)

Submitted: September 11, 2012 Decided: September 13, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Francis Graham, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis, 

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Francis Graham seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) 

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Graham has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny Graham’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4331 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4331

 To suspend temporarily the duty on 1(3H)-Isobenzofuranone, 3,3-bis(2-
                    methyl-1-octyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2004

  Mr. Forbes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on 1(3H)-Isobenzofuranone, 3,3-bis(2-
                    methyl-1-octyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 1(3H)-ISOBENZOFURANONE, 3,3-BIS(2-
              METHYL-1-OCTYL-1H-INDOL-3-YL)-.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.33.67       1(3H)-             Free         No Change        No Change        On or Before 12/  ''.
                         Isobenzofuranone,                                                  31/2007
                         3,3-bis(2-methyl-
                         1-octyl-1H-indol-
                         3-yl)- (CAS No.
                         50292-95-0)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3204.19.40)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Aubrie Weyhmiller

aubrie.weyhmiller@nist.gov

weyhmilla9@students.rowan.edu

1

Online Platform for Radiological Computations

SURF Colloquium 

August 8, 2018
2

1 •Background

2 •Program Applications

3

•Program Design, Benefits, 

Future Integration
3

Objectives

Data 

Consolidation

Program 

Development

Deployment
4

Source Geometry

Restrictive Values

Decay

Shielding

This does not replace the work of Health Physics.
5

• Neutron Flux (Φ)

 Irradiation Time  Decay Time

• Target Material  Cross Sections  Mass • Activation Products  Half-life  Emission Type  Emission Energy  Emission Intensity • Exposure Pathway
6

External Internal Skin
7
8
9
10
11

External

• Γconstant

• i constant

Schwahn & 

Smith/Stabin

(IAEA, ICRP107)

Internal

• ALI

• Ingestion 

• Inhalation

10CFR20

Skin

• VARSKIN

• Contact

• 1 cm

NRC
12

External

• Γconstant

• i dos/unit flux

Schwahn & 

Smith/Stabin

(IAEA, ICRP107)

XX

̇

specific = Γ

AA

dd2

XX

̇

pppppppppppp

= i dos/unit fluxφφ

Skin

• VARSKIN

• 1 cm 

• Contact

• NRC

XX

̇

skin = Vskin × AA
13

CC 60

ALI = 200 μμ μμ

∗ 1 ALI = 5 rr dose

100 μμCCCC

200 μμ

= 0.5 ALI

0.5 ALI * 5 rr =

2.5 rr

Internal

• ALI

• Ingestion 

• Inhalation

• 10CFR20

100 μμ μμ

ingestion
14

Website

Back-end

Python SQLite

Front-end

JavaScript HTML/CSS

• Flask 

(Jinja2)

• Numpy

• Bootstrap

• jQuery

• Plug-ins
15

Scalable Integrable User 

Friendly
16

Current

•Deploy locally

1-2 Years

•Integrate with Activation 

Calculator

Future

•Integrate with other neutron 

facilities
17

Tim Barvitskie

NCNR Health Physics

Danyal Turkoglu

NCNR Reactor Operators and Engineers

SURF 

ROE SURF group
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7681

MARK A. ANDERSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JACK LEE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-511-7) Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 8, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark A. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Leonard Taylor, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Mark A. Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Anderson v. Lee , No. CA-00-511-7 (W.D. Va. Aug. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EVEREST
FUTURES FUND, L.P. FOR THE THIRD QUARTER OF 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000837919
<NAME> EVEREST FUTURES FUND L P

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      49,035,253
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  406,797
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,442,051
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,442,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,805,989
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,636,063
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,442,051
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           (6,289,399)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  526,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,815,439)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,815,439)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,815,439)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (284.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (284.10)


</TABLE>