alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 99.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Kenneth L. Hignett, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Secretary of Morgan's Foods, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended
              March 2, 2003 (the "Report"), which this certification
              accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

                              /s/ Kenneth L. Hignett
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Kenneth L. Hignett, Senior Vice President,
                              Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
May 30, 2003
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Allen C. Bender, Individually and :

as Executor of the Estate of :

Ruth A. Bender, :

Appellant :

:

v. : No. 77 C.D. 2019

:

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, :

Department of Transportation, :

Township of Swatara, and :

Adrian T. Horrell :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, August 7, 2020, having considered Appellant’s application for 

reconsideration, the application is denied.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Sean M. Cary, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Willamette Valley
Vineyards, Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the
small business issuer and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: May 17, 2004
/s/ Sean M. Cary
    Sean M. Cary
    Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Magnitude Information
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31,
2005 (the "Form 10-QSB"), I, Steven D. Rudnik, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge, that the Company's Form 10-QSB fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: October 26, 2005                         /s/ Steven D. Rudnik
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Steven D. Rudnik
                                                President and Chief Executive
                                                Officer


                                                                              20
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income  Fund V, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:   November 13, 2003                  /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                           ------------------------
                                           Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                           Title: President and Treasurer


                                          A  signed  original  of  this  written
                                          statement  required by Section 906 has
                                          been  provided  to CNL Income  Fund V,
                                          Ltd.  and  will  be  retained  by  CNL
                                          Income Fund V, Ltd.  and  furnished to
                                          the Securities and Exchange Commission
                                          or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-41734 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE ARMANDO GOMEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-03-CR-831-1

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Armando Gomez-Hernandez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Gomez-Hernandez contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. He therefore argues that his conviction must be reduced to one under the lesser included offense found in 8 U.S.C. § 1362(a), his judgment must be reformed to reflect a United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D June 23, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 03-41734 -2- conviction only under that provision, and his sentence must be vacated and the case remanded for resentencing to no more than two years’ imprisonment and one year of supervised release.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Gomez-Hernandez acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
NIST PSCR RESEARCH INVESTMENTS BOLSTER 

ILLINOIS’ ECONOMY 

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Public Safety ILLINOIS BY THE NUMBERS 

Communications Research (PSCR) Division is the primary federal laboratory 

focused on conducting research, development, testing, and evaluation for 

public safety communications technologies. Their mission is to accelerate 

communications innovation in support of public safety communities and the 

citizens they serve. 

The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 allocated $300 Million 

from the Public Safety Trust fund to NIST PSCR to perform critical public safety 

communications R&D during a 10-year period. PSCR implemented numerous 

research mechanisms to support the development and deployment of the 

Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network: grants, Small Business Innovation 

Research (SBIR) contracts, prize challenge competitions, and internal research. 

These research mechanisms were housed within six research portfolios and crosscutting initiatives to maximize their impact: 

•	 User Interface/User Experience •	 Public Safety Analytics 

•	 Location-Based Services •	 Security 

•	 Mission Critical Voice •	 Resilient Systems 

While the ultimate impact of these research mechanisms is the increased safety 

of first responders and their communities through improved communications

technologies, PSCR was interested in better understanding how their R&D 

investments to date result in economic impacts that ripple outward to state 

economies. An independent analysis was conducted to demonstrate how PSCR’s 

deployment of the $300 Million from the Public Safety Trust Fund translated into 

broader impacts to the United States, including jobs, earnings, value added, and 

total economic output. PSCR’s R&D investments resulted in economic output 

in 33 of the 50 states. Results of the analysis are presented here. 

For more information, see NIST PSCR’s Economic Impact Study. 

Participants 

Awards Totaling 

$0.05 Million 

. 

5 Prize Challenge 

NIST INVESTMENT 

$0.05 Million 

OUTPUT 

$1.7 Million 

VALUE-ADDED 

$1.1 Million 

EARNINGS 

$0.7 Million 

JOBS 

8 

Output: the total value of economic 

activity circulating through the U.S. 

economy generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Value-Added: how much the 

combined U.S. state economies 

grew over a period of time due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments 

Earnings: the change in household 

earnings in the U.S. economy 

generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Jobs: the change in the number of 

full- and part-time jobs generated 

by each one million dollar change 

in U.S. economic activity due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments 

*All dollar amounts presented 

in 2022 and reflect data as of 

October 2022.

**All values are rounded; thus, the 

sum of the components may not 

sum exactly to the NIST Investment 

amount.

For additional information of PSCR’s research programs, visit https://www.nist.gov/ctl/pscr
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 17, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00022

- CV

IN RE Cynthia Cadwallader OCHSE

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

Irene Rios , Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

On January 11, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court is of the

opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further

consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and real part ies in interest may file a

response to the petition for writ of mandamus in this court no later than April 29, 2019

. Any

such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

R elator is also ORDERED to file the documents listed i n the privilege log o n a thumb

drive or in another suitable electronic format no later than April 29, 2 019

. Once filed, the

documents will be placed under seal.

It is so ORDERED on April 17, 2019

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018

- CI

- 05727 , styled William W. Ochse, IV, et al. v. William W. Ochse,

III, Individually and as Trustee of the William W. Ochse, III Family 2008 Trust , pending in the 37th Judicial District

Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Monique Diaz presi ding.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0845

_____________________________

CARL IRVIN LITTLE, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Leandra G. Johnson, Judge.

May 21, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Carl Irvin Little, Jr., pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Virginia Chester Harris, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         245,912
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,385
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,698
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               280,348
<PP&E>                                          63,568
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,355)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 562,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,270
<BONDS>                                        268,440
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       374,387
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   562,329
<SALES>                                         83,543
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,543
<CGS>                                           37,928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  148,727
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,860
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (22,860)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (78,205)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (78,205)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (10,101)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (88,306)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.06)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31-30**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, David E. Meador, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Michigan Consolidated Gas Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. (Intentionally omitted)  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     /s/ DAVID E. MEADOR David E. Meador Date: March 1, 2007    Executive Vice President and
**Exhibit(10)(o)(6)**

 

AMENDMENT NO. 5

TO

ALLTEL CORPORATION 401(k)PLAN

(January 1, 2001Restatement)

 

WHEREAS, ALLTEL Corporation (the “Company”) maintainsthe ALLTEL Corporation 401(k) Plan, as amended and restated effective January1, 2001, and as subsequently amended (the “Plan”); and

 

WHEREAS, the Company desires further to amend the Planin conformity to the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the Company andthe Communication Workers of America Locals 3371 and 3372 effective October 4,2003 and the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the Company and theInternational Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 463 ratified February 6,2004;

 

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Company herebyamends the Plan, effective as set forth herein, in the respects hereinafter setforth:

 

1.     Effective as of February 7, 2004, Section 13.11(b)(3) of thePlan is amended by deleting subsection (i) and substituting the following:

 

(i)            in the case of a KYCBA Employee covered by the collective bargaining agreement with IBEW Local463:

 

(A)          for Contribution Periodsending prior to January 1, 2005, 66 cents for each $1 of the KY CBA Employee’sSalary Deferral Matched Contributions for the Contribution Period, and

 

(B)           for ContributionPeriods ending after December 31, 2004, KY CBA Employee’s Salary DeferralMatched Contributions shall receive no Employer Matching Contributions and theApplicable Matching Amount shall be zero (0);

 

2.     Effective as of January 1, 2004, Section 13.11(b)(3) of thePlan is amended by deleting subsection (ii) and substituting thefollowing:

 

(ii)           in the case of a KY CBAEmployee covered by the collective bargaining agreement with the CWA:

 

(A)          for Contribution Periodsending prior to January 1, 2004, 75 cents for each $ 1 of the KY CBA Employee’sSalary Deferral Matched Contributions for the Contribution Period; and

 

(B)           for ContributionPeriods ending after December 31, 2003, KY CBA Employee’s Salary DeferralMatched Contributions shall receive no Employer Matching Contributions and the

 

----

 

Applicable Matching Amount shall be zero (0).

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, by its dulyauthorized officer, has caused this Amendment No. 5 to ALLTEL Corporation401(k) Plan (January 1, 2001 Restatement) to be executed on this 7th day ofFebruary, 2004.

 
|   | ALLTEL CORPORATION |
|--------|--------------------|
|   |               |   |
|   |               |   |
|   | By:                | /s/ | Scott T. Ford |
|   |               | Title: | President & CEO |
|        |                    |  |  |  |

 

----