alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4834 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4834

    To waive visa processing fees for nonimmigrant visitors who are 
nationals of countries providing combat troops in Afghanistan and Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 2004

 Mr. Lipinski (for himself, Mr. Quinn, and Mr. Emanuel) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To waive visa processing fees for nonimmigrant visitors who are 
nationals of countries providing combat troops in Afghanistan and Iraq.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF VISA PROCESSING FEES FOR NONIMMIGRANT VISITORS WHO 
              ARE NATIONALS OF COUNTRIES PROVIDING COMBAT TROOPS IN 
              AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ.

    For such period as the Secretary of State, in consultation with the 
Secretary of Defense, determines that a foreign country is providing 
troops for combat operations in both Afghanistan and Iraq, there shall 
no be visa processing fee charged for nonimmigrant visitors (described 
in section 101(a)(15)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 
U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(B)) who are nationals of that foreign country.
                                 <all>
```
#### James Cock, plaintiff, *vs.*Justus Palmer, defendant.

An appeal from a judgment which has heen subsequently settled, and of which satisfaction has heen acknowledged, will not he heard by the court merely to protect the rights of the respondent’s attorney to costs. If the settlement of the judgment he a fraud on his rights, Ms remedy is by motion.

(Before Bosworth, Ch. J. and Moncrief and White, JJ.)

Heard May 9,1863;

decided May 16, 1863.

This was a motion to dismiss an appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

By the Court, Bosworth, Ch. J.

It appears that the parties to this action have settled the judgment appealed from, and that the plaintiff has acknowledged satisfaction of the judgment. It does not distinctly appear that the judgment has been satisfied of record, inasmuch as the paper read by the defendant as an affidavit made by him is not sworn to. If the defendant had not in fact sworn to it, the reading of it as an affidavit actually sworn to, is highly reprehensible.

The plaintiff’s attorney should not issue execution on a judgment satisfied of record, nor an appellate court hear an *659appeal from it, taken by the defeated party, when the attorney of the party acknowledging satisfaction is the only person asking for judgment on the appeal, and the opposite party objects to farther proceeding in the appeal, on the ground that the judgment is satisfied of record.

The- plaintiff’s attorney, if he thinks the settlement and discharge of the judgment is a fraud on his rights, should move to vacate the entry of satisfaction, as was done in *Rooney*v. *Sec. Av. R. R. Co.,*(18 N. *Y. Rep.*368;) or move for an *order*that thes defendant pay his costs, as in *Read*v. *Dupper,*(6 *T. R.*361;) and *see Barker*v. *St. Quintin,*(12 *M. & Wels.*441;) and *Carpenter*v. *Sixth Av. R. R. Co.,*(1 *Am. L. R.*[N. S.] 410, 416 ; and note to the same, *Id.*423, 4, Remedies.)

The cause must be stricken from the calendar, because it appears the judgment has been settled, and satisfaction of it acknowledged ; and the plaintiff’s attorney be left to his motion to vacate the entry of satisfaction, and for leave to proceed in the action to collect his costs ; or to take such further course as he may be advised. This motion is granted without costs.
11587.

#### CUMMINGS *v.*THE STATE.

Decided July 13, 1920.

The evidence relied upon by the State to connect the accused with the ofíense of having in his custody and control intoxicating liquor was wholly circumstantial in character, and did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused. Accordingly the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Indictment for possession of liquor; from Harris superior court — Judge Howard. May 3, 1920.

*J. R. Lunsford,*for plaintiff in error.

*C. F. McLaughlin,*solicitor-general, contra.

Bloodworth, J.

The indictment charged that the accused did “have in his possession, custody, and control alcoholic, spirituous, malt and intoxicating liquor.” He was convicted and made a motion for new trial, which -was overruled, and the case is before this court for review.

The evidence shows that the defendant and one other -occupied a house jointly, and jointly controlled and used a crib, each one having a key to the crib. An officer went to this house, told the defendant that he was going to search his premises, and that unless defendant unlocked the crib he would break it open. The defendant replied that his wife, who was at church, had the key, but he walked off, not out o'f sight of the officer, and returned witli the key. The officer unlocked the crib and “found a five-gallon keg with about four gallons of whisky in it.” The defendant stated: “I had not been in the crib that day and did not know there was any whisky there. The whisky didn’t belong to mo, and I didn’t know there was any whisky on the place until Mr. Hnling found it in the crib.” There was no direct evidence that the whisky belonged to the defendant, or that it did not belong to the party who had joint possession of the crib with the defendant (he not having, so far as the record discloses, been put upou the stand). See *Lunceford*v. *Mayor &c. of Washington,*17 *Ga. App.*730 (2) (88 S. E. 212). Certainly the evidence did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused, for it is just as reasonable to conclude that the liquor belonged to the other party who jointly used the crib with the defendant. “The evidence relied upon by the State to connect the accused with the offense of having in his custody and control *428intoxicating liquor was wholly circumstantial in character, and did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused. Accordingly the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.” *Reeves*v. *State,*23 *Ga. App.*9 (97 S. E. 263). See also *Kennedy*v. *State,*23 *Ga. App.*141 (97 S. E. 894).

*Judgment reversed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN IT'S ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,277
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,674
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     47,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,487
<PP&E>                                         233,185
<DEPRECIATION>                                 121,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 201,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          391,004
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,046
<OTHER-SE>                                   (656,032)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   201,786
<SALES>                                        298,340
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               298,340
<CGS>                                           67,265
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,265
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               958,956
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (727,881)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (727,881)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GRANITE
BROADCASTING CORPORATION'S 1ST QUARTER 2000 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,688,128
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,461,953
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            56,951,927
<PP&E>                                      39,765,519
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             711,942,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       47,312,702
<BONDS>                                    292,595,927
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      217,486,896
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       184,379
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,327,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               711,942,213
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,339,280
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               36,949,368
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               928,604
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,456,519
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,995,211)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (3,183,920)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,811,291)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,783,468
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,027,823)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated condensed financial statements for the three-months ended August
31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,151,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  234,928
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    658,051
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,353,792
<PP&E>                                         788,050
<DEPRECIATION>                               (306,161)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,586,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          794,585
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,165
<COMMON>                                        48,707
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,247,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,586,894
<SALES>                                        428,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               428,100
<CGS>                                          330,368
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  330,368
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,501,197
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,209
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,408,674)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,408,674)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,408,674)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

 

**                                                THE MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY                                                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                                                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                                                      SECTION 906                                                                           OF THE                                                    SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the"Company") on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), theundersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects,the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to The MonarchCement Company and will be retained by The MonarchCement Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

Dated:  March 16, 2009

                                                                                           /s/ Debra P. Roe                                                                                                                       Debra P. Roe, CPA                                                                                            Chief Financial Officer and                                                                                            Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-22-00374-CV

KEVIN KING AND SCOTT MCAFEE,

Appellants

v.

ELAWAN DILEO SOLAR, LLC; ELAWAN ENERGY, SL; BOSQUE 

COUNTY, TEXAS; BOSQUE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT, 

MARVIN WICKMAN, TERRY TOWNLEY, LARRY PHILLIP, AND 

RODNEY LAIRDON IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES; CLIFTON 

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ALEX 

MONTES, DR. SKYLAR BIZZELL, JULIE NEW, COURTNEY 

MAYFIELD, MATT DOMEL, JOSH RITZMANN, AND DR. JAN 

ZUEHLKE IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES; TEXAS 

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS; AND GLENN HEGAR,

Appellees

From the 220th District Court

Bosque County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV22-221

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants Kevin King and Scott McAfee moved to dismiss their appeal.1 In the 

motion, appellants assert they no longer wish to pursue their appeal. 

1 Appellants actually move to withdraw their notice of appeal. The Rules of Appellate Procedure have 

been amended to label what the appellants want to do as a dismissal of the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1.
King v. Elawan Dileo Solar, LLC, et al. Page 2

The Court takes no position on and expressly does not affirm appellants’ 

reservation of the right to appeal certain orders in an appeal from a final judgment in the 

underlying case. 

The Court dismisses the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a).

There being no agreement as to costs, costs are taxed against appellants Kevin 

King and Scott McAfee. Id. (d).

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, 

Justice Johnson, and 

Justice Smith

Motion granted

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed December 21, 2022

[CV06]
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28861]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC15-41-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: Application for Approval of Acquisition of 
Jurisdictional Assets Under Section 203 of PacifiCorp.
    Filed Date: 11/28/14.
    Accession Number: 20141128-5077.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/19/14.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER15-514-000.
    Applicants: Jersey Central Power & Light Co.
    Description: Notice of Cancellation of Service Agreement of Jersey 
Central Power & Light Company.
    Filed Date: 11/26/14.
    Accession Number: 20141126-5308.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/17/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-515-000.
    Applicants: Great Bay Energy VII, LLC.
    Description: Initial rate filing per 35.12 Baseline new to be 
effective 12/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 11/28/14.
    Accession Number: 20141128-5069.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/19/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-516-000.
    Applicants: FirstEnergy Service Company.
    Description: Request for Waiver of FirstEnergy Service Company.
    Filed Date: 11/26/14.
    Accession Number: 20141126-5326.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/17/14.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: November 28, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-28861 Filed 12-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
| 1)   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                               |                                               |                                     |
|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                          |                                          |                                |
| Dated:                June 28,                2006 |                                               | /s/ WILLIAM              P. SPENCER |
|                                               | William              P. Spencer                    |
|                                               | Chief              Executive Officer and President |

----
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Morgans Foods, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
Rule 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
   Date: June 2, 2008
    /s/ Leonard R. Stein-SapirLeonard R. Stein-SapirChairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer 46