alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.A****CERTIFICATION**I, Stephen C. Beasley, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ANR Pipeline Company;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.       Date:February 21, 2007                 */s/ Stephen C. Beasley*       Stephen C. Beasley      President      (Principal Executive Officer)      ANR Pipeline Company
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         390,868
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  406,822
<ALLOWANCES>                                   152,000
<INVENTORY>                                      2,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               924,640
<PP&E>                                         147,595
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,918,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          269,330
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           11,380
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,512
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,193,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,918,913
<SALES>                                        257,295
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               257,295
<CGS>                                           62,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               240,791
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 74,306
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             74,306
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    74,306
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
10900.

#### Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. *v.*Hand.

Jenkins, P. J.

This court cannot say, as a matter of law, that the jury was not authorized to find the verdict rendered, since it is supported by the sworn testimony of the plaintiff, which they had a right to accept and believe. The fact that in a criminal proceeding the beneficiary named in the policy sued on had been convicted of voluntary manslaughter, for the felonious killing of his wife, who was the assured named in the policy, would not prevent the jury in this proceeding from accepting his sworn testimony to the effect that such killing by him was accidental and unintentional.

The'refusal of the trial court to admit in evidence a certified copy of the indictment, verdict, and sentence in the criminal case, in support of *91the coroner’s verdict (which latter was admitted in evidence under the terms of the policy), was not erroneous *Cottingham*v. *Weeks,*54 *Ga.*275; *Tumlin*v. *Parrott,*82 *Ga.*732 (2) (9 S. E. 718); *Seaboard AirLine Railway*v. *O’Quin,*124 *Ga.*357 (3) (52 S. E. 427, 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 472) ; *Powell*v. *Wiley,*125 *Ga.*823 (1) (54 S. E. 732).

Decided March 18, 1920.

Action on life-insurance policy; from city court of LaGrange-—• Judge Moon. August 27, 1919.

*Battle &*Hollis, for plaintiff in error.

*M. U. Mooty,*contra.

Nor was error committed in allowing testimony tending to show the general good character of the plaintiff, although unimpeached; since the nature of the action, and the affirmative defense set up thereto by the defendant, necessarily involved the same. 'Civil Code (1910), § 5745; *German American Mutual Life Association*v. *Farley,*102 *Ga.*720 (5) (29 S. E. 615).

The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in reopening the case in order to permit the plaintiff to introduce an additional witness to testify concerning one of the issues in the case.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 480 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 480

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2004

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 747 Broadway in Albany, New York, as the ``United States Postal 
                     Service Henry Johnson Annex''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 747 
Broadway in Albany, New York, and known as the United States Postal 
Service Carrier Annex, shall be known and designated as the ``United 
States Postal Service Henry Johnson Annex''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``United States Postal Service 
Henry Johnson Annex''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Qwest Corporation ("Qwest"), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of Qwest on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Qwest. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit
to such Form 10-K. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Qwest and will be retained by Qwest and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

|Dated: January 12, 2004 |  | By: | /s/RICHARD C. NOTEBAERTRichard C. Notebaert Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
|----------------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: January 12, 2004 |  | By: | /s/OREN G. SHAFFEROren G. Shaffer Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer                



QuickLinks
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40502

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RONNIE AMHED CEDENO;

TEOBALDO GAMBOA,

Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:95-CR-159-1

- - - - - - - - - -

June 9, 1997

Before KING, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

Ronnie Amhed Cedeno and Teobaldo Gamboa appeal their

convictions for conspiracy to possess with the intent to

distribute a controlled substance and possession with the intent

to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 

§§ 846, 841(a)(1). They argue that the evidence was insufficient

to support their convictions; that the district court erred in
No. 96-40502

- 2 -

denying their motions to suppress evidence; and that

prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments deprived them

of a fair trial. 

We conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found

that the evidence established guilt of these crimes beyond a

reasonable doubt. United States v. Ivey, 949 F.2d 759, 766 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 819 (1992).

We reject appellants’ argument that the district court erred

in denying their motions to suppress. Anita Stambaugh was not

acting as a government agent such as to give rise to Fourth

Amendment concerns. United States v. Bazan, 807 F.2d 1200, 1202

(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1038 (1987). Moreover, the

affidavit supporting the search warrant was not so lacking in

indicia of probable cause as to render official belief in its

existence entirely unreasonable. United States v. Satterwhite,

980 F.2d 317, 320 (5th Cir. 1992). The district court did not

err.

We similarly reject appellants’ argument that the

prosecutor’s remarks during closing arguments deprived them of a

fair trial. The record reveals that the remarks, when viewed

individually or together, did not deprive them of a fair trial,

and even if the remarks were prejudicial, the harm was remedied

by the district court’s curative instructions. United States v.

Montoya-Ortiz, 7 F.3d 1171, 1178 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of Protection One Acquisition Holding Corporation on Form S-4 of our report
dated February 9, 1998 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of
Lifeline Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, which report is incorporated
from the Annual Report of Lifeline Systems, Inc., on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the
caption "Independent Auditors".
 
                                            /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
December 9, 1998
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Eric HUGHES, Claimant-Appellant, and Parcel A-4 of Palmer Springs District, Mecklenburg County, Virginia, containing 3.5 Acres, more or less, Titled to John Eric Hughes, also Including the Life Estate of Mary Elizabeth C. Hughes, All right, title and interest in the real property, including all structures and improvements thereon, designated as; $1,600 in U.S. Currency, Defendants, *168Aretha Hughes; Mary Elizabeth C. Hughes, Claimants.

No. 00-2466.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 2001.

Decided May 25, 2001.

John Eric Hughes, pro se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

John Eric Hughes appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Government in its forfeiture action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See United States v. Hughes,*No. CA-00-107-3 (E .D.Va. Oct. 23, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
1 1/21/2011

Intelligent Manufacturing

Real time based optimization through entire value chain

Dr. Susan M. Smyth, 

Chief Scientist for Manufacturing

Director, Manufacturing Systems Research Lab 

General Motors R&D Center

Warren, MI
2 1/21/2011

Craft Manufacturing

Henry Leland Interchangeable Parts

(Gun Industry)

Henry Ford Assembly Line

(Meat Packaging)

Taiichi Ohno Lean Mfg. 

(Grocery Business)

Real-time 

Optimization 

(World Wide Web)

Intelligent Manufacturing is Real time 

Based Optimization

Manufacturing Paradigm Evolution
Suppliers Dealers Customers Assembly

Plants

  Real-time Enterprise

Procurement Supply Chain Pricing

Risk Management

Demand

Sensing

Sensor Network

Welcome to Arlington OnLine!

Plant Body G/A Paint Controls

Safety

People

Quality

Navigation

Responsiveness

Cost

Technology

Environment

Motor Compartment

Underbody

Inner Framing

Outer Framing

Side Operations

Dashboards

Real-time Factory

Intelligent

Maintenance

Quality Control

Supervisory Control

Asset Management

Intelligent Manufacturing – Innovation Program 

3
4 1/21/2011

Intelligent Manufacturing SCOPE 

Production

(casting, welding

machining, 

painting......)

Logistics

Energy Supplier Network Material

Product

Manufacturing System

Environment
5 1/21/2011

So ....what does an intelligent 

Manufacturing System of the future comprise of ?

Production

(casting, welding

machining, 

painting......)

Logistics

Energy Supplier Network

Environment

Some thought starters.......
 Energy 

 Environment

 System Metrics

 etc.

 Plant in a Box

 Flexible 

Enterprise

 After-sale 

Assembly

 etc.

 RT scheduling

 RT ordering

 RT Tracking

 etc.

 Flexible Tooling

 Smart Equipment

 Automation

 etc.

What

We Want

When

We Want

Where

We Want

How

We Want

Infinite 

Flexibility

Agility Movability Green +

Dexterous 

Robots Wireless DVT in a Box –

General Assembly 

Modeling of 

Energy 

Consumption

6
7 1/21/2011

humans and robots working in harmony

Robonauts

Infinite 

Flexibility

What

We Want
8 1/21/2011 8

Some questions for Session 1 Participants

What is needed to make manufacturing in this 

country “more intelligent” and solve the 

challenge of manufacturing -

What technologies will transform USA 

manufacturing enterprises into the most 

attractive global manufacturing options?

What

We Want

When

We Want

Where

We Want

How

We Want
9 1/21/2011
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4771 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4771

           To suspend temporarily the duty on cyclopentanone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 7, 2004

  Mr. Baker introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on cyclopentanone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYCLOPENTANONE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.34.41       Cyclopentanone     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (provided for in                                                   31/2007
                         subheading
                         2914.29.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit No. 32.   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the quarterly report of Questar Gas Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Alan K. Allred, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and S. E. Parks, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR GAS COMPANY    March 11, 2008 /s/Alan K. Allred Alan K. Allred President and Chief Executive Officer    March 11, 2008 /s/S. E. Parks S. E. Parks Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CAPITAL
GROWTH, INC. MARCH 31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,779
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,779
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,588
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (75,809)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,779
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,495
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,495)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,495)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,495)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of MicroVision, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

1)  the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements and
   of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   the information contained in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | /s/ALEXANDER Y. TOKMAN
    Alexander Y. Tokman
    Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 9, 2011

---