alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

## **Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, David N. Clark,certify that:

 

1.       I have reviewed thisreport on Form 10-Q****ofUranium Resources, Inc.;

 

2.       Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.       Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

 

4.       The issuer’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

 

(a)  Designed  such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theissuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change inthe issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theissuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’s first fiscal quarter of theannual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.       The issuer’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

(a)   All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: May 12, 2008 |                         |
|-------------------------|------------------------------|
|                    |                         |
|                    |                         |
|                    | /s/ David N. Clark           |
|                    | Title:  President       |
|                    | and Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4832 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit representatives 

of the foreign press to enter the United States under the visa waiver program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2004 

Mr. HOUGHTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit 

representatives of the foreign press to enter the United 

States under the visa waiver program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom of the Press 

5 Reinforcement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF VISA WAIVER PROGRAM TO REP7 RESENTATIVES OF FOREIGN PRESS. 

8 (a) APPLICATION OF PROGRAM.—Section 217 of the 

9 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187) is 
2 

•HR 4832 IH 

1 amended by adding at the end the following new sub2 section: 

3 ‘‘(i) SPECIAL RULE FOR FOREIGN PRESS.—An alien 

4 may be classified as a nonimmigrant under section 

5 101(a)(15)(B) for purposes of this section, notwith6 standing that the alien is a representative of foreign press, 

7 radio, film, or other foreign information media seeking to 

8 enter the United States to engage in such vocation.’’. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

10 101(a)(15)(B) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(B)) is 

11 amended by inserting after ‘‘unskilled labor or’’ the fol12 lowing: ‘‘, except as provided in section 217(i),’’. 

Æ
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4711 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate reductions of basic 

pay for eligibility for basic educational assistance for veterans under 

the Montgomery GI Bill. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2004 

Mr. SNYDER (for himself and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate reductions of basic pay for eligibility for basic educational 

assistance for veterans under the Montgomery GI Bill. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness in Veterans 

5 Education Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF REDUCTIONS OF BASIC PAY. 

7 (a) REPEALS.—Sections 3011(b) and 3012(c) of title 

8 38, United States Code, are each amended by adding at 
2 

•HR 4711 IH 

1 the end the following new sentence: ‘‘This subsection shall 

2 cease to have effect beginning on the first day of the first 

3 month that begins after the date of the enactment of the 

4 Fairness in Veterans Education Act of 2004.’’. 

5 (b) TERMINATION OF REDUCTIONS IN PROGRESS.— 

6 Any reduction in the basic pay of an individual referred 

7 to in section 3011(b) of title 38, United States Code, by 

8 reason of such section 3011(b), or of any individual re9 ferred to in section 3012(c) of such title by reason of such 

10 section 3012(c), as of the date of the enactment of this 

11 Act shall cease commencing with the first month begin12 ning after such date, and any obligation of such individual 

13 under such section 3011(b) or 3012(c), as the case may 

14 be, as of the day before such date shall be deemed to be 

15 fully satisfied as of such date. 

16 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3034(e)(1) 

17 of title 38, United States Code, is amended in the second 

18 sentence by striking ‘‘as soon as practicable’’ and all that 

19 follows through ‘‘such additional times’’ and inserting ‘‘at 

20 such times’’. 

Æ
#### John Hollenburg v. Augustus Shuffert et al

*Oertioram*— IMdence *to suppoi't judgment*— Submission *of case to a justice after disagreement by a jury.*

The Supreme Court cannot, on *certiorari*bringing up a judgment reversr ing that of a justice, consider the objection that the evidence did not warrant the justice’s judgment, if there was any proof bearing on the issues.

,4fter a disagreement of the jury in a justice’s court the parties submitted the case to the justice himself on the same testimony. *Held,*that they could not afterwards, on *certiorari,*complain of his previous rulings on the trial before the jury.

*127Error to Wayne.

Submitted October 14.

Decided October 19.

Trespass. Plaintiff brings error.

Reversed.

*Jfraser <& Gates*for plaintiff in error.

A party who consents to a justice’s deciding tbe case cannot afterward claim that by previous ruling he had lost jurisdiction: *Home Ins. Co. v. Curtis*32 Mich. 402.

*Quinoy Matthews*for defendants in error.

Campbell, J.

The circuit court for the county of Wayne reversed on *oertiorcvri*the judgment of a justice of the peace in favor of Hollenburg against the defendants. The errors assigned in the affidavit for *eertiora/ri,*so far as they indicate anything which could be reviewed at all, refer to rulings during a jury trial before the justice. The objection that the evidence did not warrant the judgment is not one which we can consider, as there was proof bearing on the issues.

The jury disagreed, and this put an end to that trial. After the disagreement the parties submitted the case for decision by the justice on the testimony put in before the jury, which was chiefly oral.

Having done this they are precluded from complaining of his previous trial rulings. The circuit court should not have reversed it.

The judgment of the circuit court must be reversed and that of the justice affirmed with costs of all the courts.

The other Justices concurred.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 25, 2013

h0617

Order 

Clerk

June 25, 2013

146779

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146779

COA: 306597

Wayne CC: 10-008570-01-FC

ABDULLAH DUAN LAND,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 15, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Technical Language Processing 

Community of Interest 

(TLP - COI) 

Michael P. Brundage 

Acting Program Manager, MBE Program

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

Engineering Laboratory

Systems Integration Division

mpb1@nist.gov
2

NIST Disclaimer

The use of any products described in any 

presentation does not imply 

recommendation or endorsement by the 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology, nor does it imply that products 

are necessarily the best available for the 

purpose.
3

MONDAY, APRIL 12 4:00-6:00 PM ET: THE VALUE OF TLP

This session will introduce the audience to TLP. Presenters will discuss the value of the TLP process 

and how TLP analysis has improved operations.

TUESDAY, APRIL 13 4:00-6:00 PM ET: TOOLS IN TLP

Different TLP tools will be presented and discussed. Discussions will center around the capabilities 

of the current TLP tools and the needs of future TLP tools.

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 14 4:00-6:00 PM ET: THE NEED FOR TLP DATASETS

Presenters will discuss the importance of TLP datasets and how this data improves TLP research. Discussions will focus on current TLP 

datasets and the value of creating publicly available datasets for the TLP community.

THURSDAY, APRIL 15 4:00-6:00 PM ET: CREATING THE NECESSARY TLP RESOURCES

Community driven, domain specific TLP resources will be discussed. The need for community supported and developed domain 

specific resources, such as ontologies, data representations, data schemas, and text embeddings will be presented.

FRIDAY, APRIL 16 4:00-6:00 PM ET: TLP COI NEXT STEPS

This session will focus on the next steps for the TLP COI. The structure of the COI, the outputs of the COI, and the next meetings will be 

discussed.
Rank the outputs you want to see from this workshop 

i Start presenting to display the poll results on this slide.
Communication 

• TLP-COI Slack: https://join.slack.com/t/tlp-coi/shared_invite/ztnqdsfu4y-8eHq4pzJRQhTDEaX4dazrQ

5
6

Speaker Title Company Presentation Title

Michael Brundage Acting Program Manager NIST Welcome

Thurston Sexton Mechanical Engineer NIST Importance of DataOps for 

Community TLP

Alden Dima Computer Scientist NIST What are some research 

concerns of TLP?

Michael Brundage Acting Program Manager NIST Next Steps; Next Events; 

Outputs of the COI
Communication 

• TLP-COI Slack: https://join.slack.com/t/tlp-coi/shared_invite/ztnqdsfu4y-8eHq4pzJRQhTDEaX4dazrQ

• Github: https://github.com/TLP-COI

7
What do you want from a TLP COI event moving forward? 

i Start presenting to display the poll results on this slide.
Next Events 

• June 28 – July 2, 2021 [VIRTUAL]: PHM Europe 2021- Special session on 

Technical Language Processing

• https://phm-europe.org/

• [TENTATIVE] November 1-5, 2021: PHM Society Annual Meeting 2021 -

Technical Language Processing for Maintenance Workshop 

• https://phmsociety.org/

9
Questions?

Michael Brundage 

michael.brundage@nist.gov

Tlp-coi@nist.gov

Thank you!
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 480 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2004 

Received 

AN ACT 

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 747 Broadway in Albany, New York, as 

the ‘‘United States Postal Service Henry Johnson 

Annex’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 480 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 747 Broadway in Albany, New York, and known 

4 as the United States Postal Service Carrier Annex, shall 

5 be known and designated as the ‘‘United States Postal 

6 Service Henry Johnson Annex’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

10 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

11 to the ‘‘United States Postal Service Henry Johnson 

12 Annex’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00785

- CV

Maria TIJERINA and Tiburcia Holguin, Appellants

v.

Jose German GOMEZ , Jorge Humberto Valadez, Jr. and Sonia Frausto, Appellees

From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11

- 05

- 26518

- MCV Honorable Cynthia L. Muniz, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, th e judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs be taxed against appellants because the trial court ordered that appellants could proceed on appeal in forma pauperis

.

SIGNED December 23, 2014.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              79
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,441
<PP&E>                                          39,708
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,578
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (35,836)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,742
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,643
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,643)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,643)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,643)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>               SEP-30-1998

<CASH>                                   21,073 
<SECURITIES>                               0    
<RECEIVABLES>                            23,519 
<ALLOWANCES>                               0    
<INVENTORY>                              52,251 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         99,159 
<PP&E>                                  366,996 
<DEPRECIATION>                           43,176 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          471,634 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    46,908 
<BONDS>                                 321,595 
<COMMON>                                      1 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0    
<PREFERRED>                                0    
<OTHER-SE>                             (214,876)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            471,634 
<SALES>                                  71,671 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         72,004 
<CGS>                                    67,897 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            80,586 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            951 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       24,790 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (34,323)
<INCOME-TAX>                             14,101 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (20,222)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0    
<CHANGES>                                  0    
<NET-INCOME>                            (20,222)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (20.2)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (20.2)

        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Kenneth L. Hignett, certify that:1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Morgan’s Foods, Inc.; 2.Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of February 26, 2006, based on such evaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):  a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: June 14, 2006 /s/ Kenneth L. Hignett           Kenneth L. Hignett,      Senior Vice President,      Chief Financial Officer & Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.2

                               TELVUE CORPORATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. sec. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of TelVue Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Fell,
Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  11/16/09                         /s/ John Fell
                                        -------------
                                        John Fell
                                        Treasurer-Controller