- -

= =

Vendor E VISIT_POE Left Index 

threshold 60 (far,tar) (0.0370302,0.829333) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0746231 0.0304385 0.0338791 0.0311571 0.00992974 

TAR 0.990054 0.946515 0.763796 0.298013 0.164384 

Figure 1. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset VISIT_POE - Left Index 
 

- -

= =

Vendor E VISIT_POE Right Index 

threshold 60 (far,tar) (0.0179487,0.828167) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0383798 0.0144863 0.0172072 0.0206107 0.00594389 

TAR 0.987832 0.935462 0.749497 0.403361 0.194444 

Figure 2. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset VISIT_POE - Right Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor E VIST_POE_BVA - Left Index 

threshold 190 (far,tar) (0.00714952,0.7885) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0130961 0.00385875 0.00570622 0.00929822 0.000878593 

TAR 0.970035 0.897735 0.691998 0.316384 0.0526316 

Figure 3. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset VISIT_POE_BVA - Left Index 
 

- -

= =

Vendor E VISIT_POE_BVA Right Index 

threshold 80 (far,tar) (0.00752653,0.843833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0123338 0.00473094 0.00692891 0.00855041 0.00197003 

TAR 0.977301 0.938209 0.746377 0.351351 0.111111 

Figure 4. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset VISIT_POE_BVA - Right Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor E BEN- Left Index 

threshold 190 (far,tar) (0.0130662,0.708333) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0210251 0.00798643 0.0129765 0.0158512 0.00197815 

TAR 0.937269 0.826276 0.60962 0.180791 0.0282258 

Figure 5. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset BEN - Left Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor E BEN- Right Index 

threshold 110 (far,tar) (0.0112329,0.789333) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.012737 0.00653685 0.0135812 0.0158037 0.00440197 

TAR 0.956242 0.888783 0.671053 0.24812 0.0555556 

Figure 6. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset BEN - Right Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor E BEN- Left Thumb 

threshold 440(far,tar) (0.0187006,0.910833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0208876 0.0227053 0.0156185 0.0120007 0.000655847 

TAR 0.979007 0.959738 0.898305 0.593407 0.114754 

Figure 7. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset BEN - Left Thumb 
 

-

= =

Vendor E BEN- Right Thumb 

threshold 250(far,tar) (0.0156889,0.9355) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0164548 0.0168705 0.0159669 0.0119675 0.000690591 

TAR 0.986187 0.975881 0.921538 0.693878 0.174603 

Figure 8. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset BEN - Right Thumb 
 

- -

= =

Vendor E DHS10 Left Index 

threshold 190(far,tar) (0.010676,0.651833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0270602 0.0108742 0.0114081 0.00938138 0.000991033 

TAR 0.951327 0.897959 0.65212 0.227092 0.0528376 

Figure 9. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset DHS10- Left Index 
 

- -

= =

Vendor E DHS10 Right Index 

threshold 80(far,tar) (0.00914569,0.6825) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0167673 0.00790851 0.00999666 0.0103769 0.00186943 

TAR 0.951782 0.911215 0.648697 0.299517 0.0797546 

Figure 10. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset DHS10 - Right Index 
 

- -

= =

Vendor E DHS10 Left Thumb 

threshold 330(far,tar) (0.0149984,0.812333) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.02532 0.0152978 0.0156871 0.00935059 0.00109667 

TAR 0.982186 0.937234 0.793369 0.388664 0.0526316 

Figure 11. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset DHS10- Left Thumb 
 

- -

= =

Vendor E DHS10 Right Thumb 

threshold 190(far,tar) (0.011608,0.8365) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0181489 0.010169 0.0121576 0.0088586 0.00165392 

TAR 0.981259 0.960377 0.792869 0.376963 0.0625 

Figure 12. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset DHS10 - Right Thumb 
 

- -

= =

Vendor E TXDPS Left Index 

threshold 190(far,tar) (0.0165329,0.785667) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0363443 0.0139456 0.0151531 0.0120993 0.0012392 

TAR 0.966321 0.942652 0.766667 0.333333 0.103774 

Figure 13. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset TXDPS - Left Index 
 

- -

= =

Vendor E TXDPS Right Index 

threshold 110(far,tar) (0.0115406,0.8175) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0200686 0.00854083 0.0110669 0.0130262 0.00153377 

TAR 0.966161 0.9341 0.800628 0.331288 0.11413 

Figure 14. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset TXDPS - Right Index 
 

- -

= =

Vendor E TXDPS Left Thumb 

threshold 440(far,tar) (0.0106559,0.843833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0159296 0.0081259 0.00992647 0.00606367 0.000346463 

TAR 0.970561 0.929314 0.789528 0.356481 0.137255 

Figure 15. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset TXDPS - Left Thumb 
 

- -

= =

Vendor E TXDPS Right Thumb 

threshold 250(far,tar) (0.010292,0.8735) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0142741 0.00737289 0.0103822 0.00974219 0.00169473 

TAR 0.97627 0.945694 0.805405 0.316547 0.119048 

Figure 16. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset TXDPS - Right Thumb 
 

- -

= =

Vendor E DOS C- Left Index 

threshold 190(far,tar) (0.00739551,0.778333) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.017526 0.00418498 0.00778132 0.00697656 0.00217296 

TAR 0.96865 0.882029 0.590674 0.269231 0.118812 

Figure 17. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset DOS-C - Left Index 
 

- -

= =

Vendor E DOS C- Right Index 

threshold 80(far,tar) (0.00725954,0.861833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0127507 0.00491665 0.0085378 0.0145277 0.00449721 

TAR 0.983716 0.934732 0.668044 0.4 0.152778 

Figure 18. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset DOS-C - Right Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor E DHS2-C- Left Index 

threshold 60(far,tar) (0.0352455,0.543988) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0767519 0.0262343 0.0324198 0.0485329 0.0103534 

TAR 0.802645 0.58917 0.446013 0.272727 0.103586 

Figure 19. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset DHS2-C - Left Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor E DHS2-C- Right Index 

threshold 60(far,tar) (0.0126974,0.487262) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0279168 0.0089808 0.0139283 0.020948 0.00370925 

TAR 0.794504 0.535135 0.375 0.204545 0.0601504 

Figure 20. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor E - Dataset DHS2-C - Right Index