alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

Pennsylvania

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international system of units (SI), documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully 

completed training and proficiency tests, documented calibration intervals, submitted a quality management system, and 

demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope

Mass Echelon II

30 kg to 1 mg

1000 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Mass Echelon III

2500 kg to 1 mg

5000 lb to 0.001 lb

12 oz to 0.01 oz

200 oz t to 0.005 oz t

1000 gr to 0.1 gr

Weight Carts

6000 lb to 3000 lb

Wheel Load Weighers

≤ 40 000 lb

Volume Gravimetric, I

500 L to 5 L

120 gal to 1 gal

5 gal (Imperial)

Volume Transfer, II

5000 L to 20 L 

1500 gal to 5 gal

Length, Bench

Steel Tapes

≤ 200 ft

Time

Stopwatches

≤ 24 h

Force

≤ 50 lbf

(Rev.: September 2021)

2022 to 2023

____________________________________

Katrice Lippa, Chief

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

Effective Dates: 2023-02-01 to 2024-02-01

NOTE: Amended 2023-01-31 for voluntary 

scope reduction for Weight Carts and Volume Transfer, II.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
<LEGEND>                  THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                          EXTRACT ED FROM ANR PIPELINE COMPANY FORM 10-K
                          ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
                          AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
                          SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>              1,000,000

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                              201
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                 28
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           259
<PP&E>                                   3,462
<DEPRECIATION>                           2,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,701
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      198
<BONDS>                                    498
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                 736
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,701
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           662
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              362
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          47
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            253
<INCOME-TAX>                                94
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        159
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                               159
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      10.1

    Allonge
      #5

    


    ALLONGE
      #5

    ($1,000,000
      NOTE)

     

    This
      Allonge #5 is hereby attached to and made a part of the Secured Promissory
      Note
      dated September 30, 2005, as amended by that certain Allonge dated October
      14,
      2005, that certain Allonge #2 dated October 21, 2005, that certain Allonge
      #3
      dated November 3, 2005 and that certain Allonge #4 dated November 14, 2005
      (the
“Note”), executed by Winwin
      Gaming, Inc.,
      a
      Delaware corporation (“Borrower”) in the original principal amount of $1,000,000
      in favor of Solidus
      Networks, Inc.,
      a
      Delaware corporation (“Lender”). All capitalized terms not otherwise defined
      herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Note.

     

    1. Section
      1
      of the Note is hereby amended by deleting “December 1, 2005” in the second line
      thereof and substituting therefor “December 31, 2005.”

     

    2. Borrower
      hereby ratifies and reaffirms the validity and enforceability of all of the
      liens and security interest heretofore granted pursuant to the Security
      Agreement, as collateral security for the Second Obligations (as defined in
      the
      Security Agreement), and acknowledges that all of such liens and security
      interests, and all Collateral heretofore pledged as security for the Secured
      Obligations, continues to be and remains Collateral for the Secured Obligations
      from and after the date hereof.

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Allonge #5 to be executed
      and delivered by their duly authorized officers on December 1,
      2005.

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	Solidus
              Networks, Inc.
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	 	By:  	/s/
              S.L. Zelinger
	 	
              

              Name: S.L.
                Zelinger

              Title: General
                Counsel

            
	 	 

 

    
      	 	 	 
	 	Winwin
              Gaming, Inc.
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	 	By:  	/s/
              Patrick Rogers
	 	
              

              Name: Patrick
                Rogers

              Title: CEO/President
EXHIBIT 23(b)




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC AUDITORS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Post-Effective Amendment 
No. 2 to Form S-8 Registration Statement for the ALLTEL Corporation Incentive 
Stock Option Plan (No. 2-99523); Form S-8 Registration Statement for 
Systematics, Inc. 1981 Incentive Stock Option Plan (No. 33-35343); Form S-8 
Registration Statement for the ALLTEL Corporation 1991 Stock Option Plan 
(No. 33-48476); Form S-8 Registration Statement for the ALLTEL Corporation 1994
Stock Option Plan (No. 33-54175); Form S-8 Registration Statement for the
ALLTEL Corporation Thrift Plan (No. 33-56291); and Form S-8 Registration
Statement for the ALLTEL Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan for Employees
(No. 33-65199) of our report dated May 29, 1998 with respect to the financial
statements of the 360 Communications Company Retirement Savings Plan, included 
in ALLTEL Corporation's Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-K (Form 10-K/A) for the year
ended December 31, 1998.


                                                /s/Ernst & Young LLP
                                                  Ernst & Young LLP


Chicago, Illinois,
April 28, 1999.



                                        4
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4408 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4408

                    For the relief of Jen-Hui Tsai.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2004

   Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of Jen-Hui Tsai.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR JEN-HUI TSAI.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Jen-Hui Tsai shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Jen-Hui Tsai enters the United States 
before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), she shall be 
considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Jen-Hui Tsai, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Jen-Hui Tsai 
shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 
privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28804]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of The Secretary


List of Countries Requiring Cooperation With an International 
Boycott

    In accordance with section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is publishing a current list of 
countries which require or may require participation in, or cooperation 
with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).
    On the basis of the best information currently available to the 
Department of the Treasury, the following countries require or may 
require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott 
(within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986).
Iraq
Kuwait
Lebanon
Libya
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Syria
United Arab Emirates
Yemen

    Dated: December 2, 2014.
Danielle Rolfes,
International Tax Counsel (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2014-28804 Filed 12-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-P
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4552 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4552

          To suspend temporarily the duty on l-Aspartic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2004

  Mr. Burns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on l-Aspartic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON L-ASPARTIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.29.01      l-Aspartic acid     Free         No Change        No Change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 56-84-8)                                                  31/2006
                         provided for in
                         subheading
                         2922.49.40.......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

Qwest Corporation: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-3 (333-156101) of Qwest Corporation (theCompany) of our report dated February 21, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Qwest Corporation as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholder’s (deficit)equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, which report appears in the December 31, 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Qwest Corporation. 

KPMG LLP 

Denver, Colorado 

February 21, 2011
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Darrell B. Lee, Chief Financial Officer of MOCON, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MOCON, Inc.   Date: March 30, 2011  /s/   Darrell B. LeeDarrell   B. LeeChief   Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 28, 2013

t0520 

# Order

Clerk May 28, 2013

146781

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Pl aintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146781

COA: 304458

Oakland CC: 2010

- 232779

- FC

JOHNNY CLARENCE BRYANT, III,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 15, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1

May 28, 1998


Board of Directors of
EFTC Corporation
9351 Grant Street
Denver, Colorado 80229

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is made to the registration statement on Form S-3 (the "Registration
Statement") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission") by EFTC Corporation, a Colorado corporation (the "Company"), for
the purpose of registering the issuance by the Company of up to 3,950,000
shares of Common Stock (the "Company Shares") and the resale by certain
shareholders of the Company of up to 1,800,000 shares of Common Stock (the
"Shareholder Shares") under the Securities Act of 1933.

As counsel for the Company, we have (1) examined and relied upon the
Registration Statement and (2) reviewed the Company's Articles of Incorporation
and Bylaws, each as amended, and such other documents and such questions of law
as we have considered necessary or appropriate for the purpose of this opinion.
Based on the foregoing, we are of the opinion that (a) the Company Shares, when
sold and delivered by the Company, as described in the Registration Statement,
will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and (b) the Shareholder
Shares have been validly issued and are fully paid and nonassessable.

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Legal Matters" in
the prospectus included in the Registration Statement and to the filing of this 
opinion with the Commission as an exhibit to the Registration Statement.

We do not express an opinion on any matters other than those expressly set
forth in this letter.

Very truly yours,

Holme Roberts & Owen LLP


By: /s/ Francis R. Wheeler
   --------------------------
   Partner
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4742 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Foron Blue S-BGL granules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2004 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Foron Blue S-BGL 

granules. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON FORON BLUE S-BGL 

4 GRANULES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.35.06 Foron Blue S-BGL granules 

(anthraquinone dye) (CAS 

No. 31529–83–6) (provided 

for in subheading 

3204.11.10 ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 4742 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
MEP Advisory Board Meeting 

Tuesday, February 23, 2021

1 p.m. – 4:30 p.m.

Virtual Meeting

Connection Info Sent Under Separate Cover

AGENDA

1 p.m.–1:05 p.m.

5 minutes

Meeting Opening/Logistics Cheryl Gendron, NIST MEP

1:05 p.m.–1:25 p.m.

25 minutes

Welcome and Introductions

Opening Remarks

Welcome from NIST Leadership

Board and Audience Introductions

Matt Newman, Chair, MEP Advisory 

Board 

James Olthoff, NIST

Mojdeh Bahar, NIST

Rob Ivester, NIST MEP

1:25 p.m.–2:05 p.m.

45 minutes

NIST MEP Senior Management

Update 

Board Feedback and Discussion

Rob Ivester

2:05 p.m.–2:35 p.m.

30 minutes

Presentation: 

MEP: 1988 to Now – Three 

Meaningful Legislative Reforms

Board Feedback and Discussion

Chancy Lyford, NIST MEP

2:35 p.m.–2:50 p.m.

15 minutes

Meeting Break

2:50 p.m.–3:20 p.m.

30 minutes

Presentation: 

Strategic Planning Foundation

Board Feedback and Discussion

Rob Ivester

Lisë Stewart, Eisner Ampner

3:20 p.m.- 3:40 p.m.

20 minutes

Working Group Update:

MEP National NetworkTM Strategic 

Plan 2023-2028 

Board Feedback and Discussion

Kathay Rennels, MEP Advisory Board

Rob Ivester

3:40 p.m.- 4:00 p.m.

20 minutes

Working Group Update:

Supply Chain Development 

Working Group 

Board Feedback and Discussion

Don Bockoven, MEP Advisory Board

Dave Stieren, NIST MEP

Agenda Subject to Change

Times are estimated
4 p.m.- 4:20 p.m.

20 minutes

Working Group Update:

Executive Committee Working 

Group

Board Feedback and Discussion

Mary Isbister, MEP Advisory Board

Cheryl Gendron

4:20 p.m.-4:30 p.m.

10 minutes

Public Comments/Wrap Up Matt Newman

Rob Ivester

Meeting Open to the Public/Registration Required

All attendees will be participating via webinar; please contact Ms. Cheryl Gendron at 301-975-2785 or 

cheryl.gendron@nist.gov for detailed instructions on how to join the online meeting. All registration requests 

must be received by 5 p.m. EST, Friday, February 19, 2021. 

Rev. 2/11/21
Exhibit 32.2

Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(b) and section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  18 U.S.C. Section 1350





I,  Randal Hardy, Chief Financial Officer of HuntMountain Resources, certify that:





1.

This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of HuntMountain Resources fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HuntMountain Resources.



Date: March 30, 2006

/s/ Randal L. Hardy

________________________________

Randal L. Hardy, Chief Financial Officer
1

 The amendment to § 1447(c) impacted only remand orders for

procedural defects. My position is therefore unaffected by the

amendment. I am in accord with the jurisdictional analysis in the

Allstate dissent, also written subsequent to the amendment.

BLACK, Circuit Judge, dissenting:

I respectfully dissent. This is a classic example of the old

adage that "bad facts make bad law." The case is difficult because

the district court erroneously remanded it to state court, but I

believe the majority stands to do even greater harm in attempting

to rectify this mistake.

As stated in the dissent of the opinion relied upon by the

majority, In re Allstate Ins. Co., 8 F.3d 219 (5th Cir. 1993):

The majority opinion expands our power to review remand

orders, contrary to the will of Congress in section

1447(c) and of the Supreme Court in Thermtron Products.

Id. at 224 (Higginbotham, J., dissenting).

In my view, the issue in this case is jurisdictional.1 The

jurisdictional nature of a remand order cannot hinge on the depth

of the district court's inquiry into jurisdiction. Even when a

remand order is erroneous, § 1447(d) prohibits appellate review if

the district court issued the order under § 1447(c). Thermtron

Prods., Inc. v. Hermansdorfer, 96 S. Ct. 584, 589 (1976). By

classifying the issue in this case as procedural rather than

jurisdictional, the majority circumvents this rule by allowing

appellate review of a district court's remand order issued under

§ 1447(c) to determine if jurisdiction "factually" exists. Such a

practice permits an end run around Thermtron Products and

undermines judicial discretion.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 16, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 16, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18I0176. THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF 

GEORGIA v. ONE SIXTY OVER NINETY, LLC.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

SU17CV1023