alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4569 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4569

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To provide for the development of a national plan for the control and 
  management of Sudden Oak Death, a tree disease caused by the fungus-
      like pathogen Phytophthora ramorum, and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4569

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide for the development of a national plan for the control and 
  management of Sudden Oak Death, a tree disease caused by the fungus-
      like pathogen Phytophthora ramorum, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL PLAN FOR CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT OF SUDDEN OAK 
              DEATH.

    (a) Development of National Plan.--Subject to the availability of 
appropriated funds for this purpose, the Secretary of Agriculture, 
acting through the Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service, shall 
develop a national plan for the control and management of Sudden Oak 
Death, a forest disease caused by the fungus-like pathogen Phytophthora 
ramorum.
    (b) Plan Elements.--In developing the plan, the Secretary shall 
specifically address the following:
            (1) Information derived by the Department of Agriculture 
        from ongoing efforts to identify hosts of Phytophthora ramorum 
        and survey the extent to which Sudden Oak Death exists in the 
        United States.
            (2) Past and current efforts to understand the risk posed 
        by Phytophthora ramorum and the results of control and 
        management efforts regarding Sudden Oak Death, including 
        efforts related to research, control, quarantine, and hazardous 
        fuel reduction.
            (3) Such future efforts as the Secretary considers 
        necessary to control and manage Sudden Oak Death, including 
        cost estimates for the implementation of such efforts.
    (c) Consultation.--The Secretary shall develop the plan in 
consultation with other Federal agencies that have appropriate 
expertise regarding the control and management of Sudden Oak Death.
    (d) Implementation of Plan.--The Secretary shall complete the plan 
and commence implementation as soon as practicable after the date on 
which funds are first appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in subsection (e) to carry out this section.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary such sums as may be necessary to carry 
out this section.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 5, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the
Annual Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Robert L. Demorest, Chief Executive Officer of MOCON, Inc.,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my
knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MOCON, Inc.   Date:
  March 31, 2009/s/
  Robert L. DemorestRobert
  L. DemorestChief
  Executive Officer
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-20103

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RONNIE ANTHONY THOMAS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CR-368-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Ronnie Anthony Thomas

presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States

v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), which rejected a Commerce

Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C.

§ 922(g). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 18, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-10-00045-CR

______________________________

CALVIN WAYNE BURNHAM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 123rd Judicial District Court

Panola County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2005-C-0008

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Calvin Wayne Burnham appeals from his convictions by the trial court on four charges of 

aggravated sexual assault of a child and four charges of indecency with a child. Burnham has 

filed a single brief, in which he raises issues common to all of his appeals.1 He argues that the 

trial court committed reversible error in considering evidence from a previous revocation hearing 

when granting the State’s second amended motion to adjudicate guilt and in admitting the results 

of a polygraph examination. Burnham also complains that the evidence was insufficient to 

establish that he violated any conditions of his community supervision. 

We addressed these issues in detail in our opinion of this date on Burnham’s appeal in 

cause number 06-10-00038-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that 

reversible error has not been shown in this case.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: December 14, 2010

Date Decided: December 15, 2010

Do Not Publish

 

1Burnham appeals from four convictions of aggravated sexual assault of a child and four convictions of indecency 

with a child, cause numbers 06-10-00038-CR through 06-10-00045-CR.
Second Amendment to the Television Listing Data Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.0 
  

			
	 Exhibit 10.0
 as filed with
 10-Q
	  	Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this exhibit. The copy filed herewith omits the information subject to the confidentiality request. Omissions are designated as [*].
A complete version of this exhibit has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

  
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 
 TELEVISION
LISTINGS DATA AGREEMENT 
 BETWEEN TIVO INC.
AND TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC. 
  
 This Amendment, dated June 28, 2005, amends the Television Listings Data Agreement between Tribune Media Services, Inc., (“TMS”) and TiVo, Inc.
(“Licensee”) dated March 1, 2004 (Agreement). All terms of the referenced Agreement will apply to the following: 
  
 In addition to the licenses granted in the Agreement, TMS herein grants to Licensee the Licensed Data specifically defined in Exhibit 1, Section I: 
  

	SEE	ATTACHED DOCUMENT “[*]”


  
 Licensee shall use the above Licensed Data solely for their
internal research & development of their TiVo service. 
  
 Except as
expressly provided in this Amendment, the terms and conditions of the original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. To the extent that there is a conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the Agreement dated
March 1,2004, the terms of this Amendment shall control. 
  

									
	Tivo, Inc.	 	 	 	Tribune Media Services, Inc.
					
	Signature:	 	 /s/ Mark Roberts

	 	 	 	Signature:	 	 /s/ Barbara Needleman


	Print Name:	 	Mark Roberts	 	 	 	Print Name:	 	Barbara Needleman
	Title:	 	S.V.P. of Consumer Products	 	 	 	Title:	 	Vice President of Entertainment Products
	Date:	 	7/21/2005	 	 	 	Date:	 	8/5/2005

  
 Corporate Headquarters
• 4-35 N, Michigan Avenue • Suite 1500 • Chicago, IL 60511 • 312.222.4444 
  


	[*]	Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the
omitted portions.
Letter Agreement dated December 6, 2005



 Exhibit 10.23.1 
  
 WELLS FARGO RETAIL FINANCE II, LLC 
 One Boston Place, 19th Floor 
 Boston, Massachusetts 02108 
  
 December 6, 2005 
  
 Alloy, Inc. 
 151 West 26th Street 
 11th Floor 
 New York, NY 10001 
  
 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: 
  
 Reference is made to the Make Whole Agreement, dated October 14, 2004 (the “Make Whole
Agreement”), entered into by Alloy, Inc. (“Alloy”) in favor of Wells Fargo Retail Finance II, LLC (the “Lender”) in connection with the transactions contemplated by that certain Amended
and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of October 14, 2004, by and among dELiA*s Assets Corp. (formerly known as dELiA*s Corp.), the other borrowers signatory thereto and the Lender. 
  
 Upon consummation of each of the following, and contemporaneously with and
effective upon the date of consummation of the later to occur of the following (the “Effective Date”): 
  
 (A) the consummation of the “Spinoff” (as defined in the Registration Statement referred to herein) of dELiA*s Inc.
(“dELiA*s”) by Alloy as contemplated by the Registration Statement of dELiA*s on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 7, 2005, as amended or supplemented, and 
  
 (B) the earlier to occur of the following: 
  
 (1) the maintenance of the “Designated Account” (as described in a
certain letter dated December 6, 2005 from Olshan, Grundman, Frome, Rosenzweig & Wolofsky LLP, counsel to MLF Investments, LLC (“MLF”), to Alloy), as the segregated account described in Section 5(f) of that
certain Standby Purchase Agreement (the “Backstop Agreement”) dated as of September 7, 2005 entered into by and among Alloy, dELiA*s, Inc., and MLF and maintenance, as of the consummation of the Spinoff, of the Readily
Marketable Securities in that Designated Account in accordance with the December 6, 2005 letter (as required in Paragraph 5(f) of the Backstop Agreement), or 







 (2) the Closing on the subscription for MLF’s pro rata share of the Rights (as defined in the
Backstop Agreement) and, if necessary, the Backstop Amount and the payment by MLF of the Exercise Price for its pro rata share of the Rights and, if necessary, the Backstop Amount, (as each of the terms “Backstop Amount” and “Exercise
Price” is defined in Section 2 of the Backstop Agreement), 
  
 the
Lender hereby irrevocably and unconditionally, as of the Effective Date, (i) forever releases and fully discharges Alloy from all obligations, duties, and liabilities of whatever nature, whether accrued or contingent, under or arising out of
the Make Whole Agreement and (ii) agrees that the Make Whole Agreement is and shall be terminated and of no further legal force and effect. 
  

			
	 Very truly yours,

	
	 Wells Fargo Retail Finance II, LLC

		
	By:	 	     /s/ Francis D. O’Connor

	 	 	Name:  Francis D. O’Connor
	 	 	 Title:  Senior Vice President



  

			
	 Acknowledged by:

	
	 Alloy, Inc.

		
	By:	 	     /s/ James K. Johnson, Jr.

	 	 	 Name:  James K. Johnson, Jr.

	 	 	 Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32 .2





Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Imagenetix, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lowell W.
Giffhorn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
      November 9, 2009
              /s/LOWELL W. GIFFHORNLowell
      W. GiffhornChief
      Financial Officer
Reprinted from Proceedings, Open Forum on Surge Protection Application, NISTIR-4654, August 1991 

Significance

Part 4 – Propagation and coupling of surges 

The 1991 revision of the IEEE Recommended Practice on Surge Voltages C62.41 introduced a new 

generation of surge waveforms; how they travel in low-voltage power systems will affect some of the 

earlier tenets on surge propagation characteristics. The emergence of cascaded surge-protective devices 

also raised a new set of concerns in which propagation characteristics play an important role, where 

system designers rely on the inherent impedance of the wiring between the two devices to provide the 

electrical separation necessary to obtain coordination. 

During the development of the revised IEEE Recommended Practice in the late eighties, some reluctance 

was encountered in deleting the mention of wire diameter for the branch circuits. The wire size was 

included in the definition of the 'Location Categories' given in the 1980 version of the IEEE Std 587 Guide 

The paper presents a review the propagation characteristics of the old and the new generation of surges 

waveforms encountered in low-voltage ac power systems. To complement information developed on this 

subject over the last ten years, measurements results are reported for the new 10/1000 μs waveform, and 

the effect (or, rather, the lack of significant effect) of wire diameter is documented by a simple experimental 

demonstration. 

Filename: Propagation 1991
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4829

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 7, 2004

Received 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 103 East Kleberg in Kingsville, Texas, as 

the ‘‘Irma Rangel Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 4829 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 103 East Kleberg in Kingsville, Texas, shall be 

4 known and designated as the ‘‘Irma Rangel Post Office 

5 Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Irma Rangel Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 6, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4764 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4764

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility for 
 pension benefits under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs to veterans who received an expeditionary medal during a period 
            of military service other than a period of war.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 6, 2004

  Mr. Rahall introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility for 
 pension benefits under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs to veterans who received an expeditionary medal during a period 
            of military service other than a period of war.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR VETERANS PENSION BENEFITS TO 
              VETERANS WHO RECEIVED AN EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL FOR A PERIOD 
              OF MILITARY SERVICE OTHER THAN A PERIOD OF WAR.

     Section 1501(4) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new sentence: ``Such term includes, in 
the case of any veteran, any period of active military, naval, or air 
service not covered by the preceding sentence for which the veteran 
received an expeditionary medal.''.
                                 <all>
```
exv10w2



 







Exhibit 10.2




BELO 2004 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR AWARD NOTIFICATION



Director:


Date of Grant:


Under the terms of the Belo 2004 Executive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), you have been granted
the following awards. All awards are effective on the Date of Grant set forth above and are
subject to the applicable terms and conditions of the Plan, which are incorporated herein by
reference. Your long-term incentive awards are described below.




1. Stock Options.




	 	 	 
	No. of shares:

	 	___shares of Belo Series B Common Stock
	 
	 	 
	Option exercise price:

	 	$ ___ per share
	 
	 	 
	Vesting and exercise dates:

	 	___shares on and after [100% one year from
grant date]
	 
	 	 
	Expiration date:

	 	The option will expire on, and may not be
exercised after, [ten years from grant date]





Your right, if any, to exercise vested and unvested stock options upon your termination of service
is set forth in the termination guidelines attached as Appendix A to this Award Notification.




2. Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)*.



	 	 	 
	No. of RSUs:

	 	                    
	 
	 	 
	Vesting:

	 	100% on the date of the annual meeting of shareholders on
[one year following grant date]
	 
	 	 
	Payment date:

	 	Within 10 business days following the date of the annual
meeting of shareholders in [three years following grant
date]
	 
	 	 
	Form of payment:

	 	60% in shares of Belo Series A Common Stock;
40% in cash





Your right, if any, to payment with respect to your Restricted Stock Units upon your termination of
service is set forth in the termination guidelines attached as Appendix A to this Award
Notification.






 




			
	*	 	RSUs are referred to in the Plan as “Deferred Shares.”




3. Change in Control. In the event of a Change in Control as defined in the Plan, (i) all
unvested stock options will vest and become exercisable immediately and (ii) all RSUs will vest
immediately. Vested RSUs will be paid at the earliest practicable date that payment may be made
without violating any applicable provision of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code




 









 








Appendix A




Termination Guidelines for Stock Options and Restricted Stock Units




Granted to Non-Employee Directors




	 	 	 	 	 
	Termination Reason	 	Stock Options	 	Restricted Stock Units
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Voluntary resignation

	 	Unvested options are
forfeited
immediately. Vested
options remain
exercisable for
original term of the
option.
	 	Vesting will be
pro-rated based on
actual service
rendered. Payment is
made on the normal
payment date (date of
annual meeting 3 years
from grant date).
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Retirement

	 	Vesting is
accelerated and
options remain
exercisable for
original term of the
option.
	 	Vesting will be
pro-rated based on
actual service
rendered. Payment is
made on the normal
payment date (date of
annual meeting 3 years
from grant date).
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Death or Disability

	 	Vesting is
accelerated and
options remain
exercisable for
original term of the
option.
	 	Vesting is accelerated
and RSUs are paid as
soon as practicable.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7256** 

JEROME ANDERSON , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. A. K. PRUITT, Captain; SUSAN HORAN , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 00553

- NCT

- PTS )

Submitted : November 15, 2011 Decided: November 18, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN , Circu it Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Jerome Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert T. Numbers, II, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinion s are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jerome Anderson appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Pruitt , No. 1:10

- cv - 00553

- NCT

- PTS (M.D.N.C. Sept. 12, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequatel y presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMDL, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, GaryL. Dreher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.   /S/  GARY L. DREHER Gary L. Dreher Chief Executive Officer November 12, 2004
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 15, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00815

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF ALVIDA MAE AGUILAR

,

Fro m the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- PC

- 2802

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED.

The appellant ’ s brief is due on March 1 3, 2014.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of January, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court