alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### W. A. Holland *v.*A. C. Vallandingham.

Contracts — Against Public Policy.

Where A. who was a candidate for office entered into a contract with B., who was a candidate for the same office, whereby A. agreed *4to withdraw from the race and to use his influence for the election of B., in consideration that B., if elected, would give A. employment at a stated salary, the contract is illegal and void as against public policy.

APPEAL FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT.

June 16, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

Appellant alleges in substance that he was a candidate before the legislature of Kentucky for the office of Public Binder, the legislature having the legal authority to elect or appoint to that office, that he was eligible to the office and competent to discharge the duties thereof; that there were several other applicants for the same office at the same time, amongst whom was appellee; that sixteen or eighteen members of the legislature were- pledged to- support appellant for the office, and he had the prospect of getting the support of others, perhaps enough to secure his election to the office; that while he was thus a candidate, with favorable prospects for his election, appellee proposed if he would withdraw from the canvass, support him, and get the members of the legislature who were pledged to support appellant for the office, and aid him in his election, that he, if elected, would give him employment in the enterprise from which he should realize $2,000 per annum, or that appellee would employ appellant to labor in the business at a salaiy of $2,000, and in consideration of said promise and undertaking on the part of appellee, that appellant did withdraw from the canvass, procured his friends and supporters in the legislature to vote for appellee, and he remained in Frankfort and aided otherwise in the election of appellee, he failed and refused to perform his contract, by giving him- employment in the business, or to- pay him a salary of $2,000 per annum, although he was ready and willing and competent to labor in the business, and offered to perform the requisite services therefor. To the petition and an amended petition a demurrer was sustained by the court below, and appellant failing to plead further his petition was dismissed, and he has brought the case to this court for revision.

The contract binds appellant to labor and exert his influence to promote the election or appointment of appellee to the office of *5public binder, whether he is better qualified or not than any other applicant, or indeed whether he is qualified at all. By its terms he was to labor and influence others to vote for appellee for the hope of the reward promised and which he expects to receive regardless of the qualifications or fitness of appellee for the office; when it was his duty as a faithful citizen of the commonwealth to exert himself for the best interests of his country, the contract which he sues on and seeks to enforce is illegal, against public policy and such as denounced by the law. *McGill’s Adm'r v. Burnett, 7*J. J. Marsh 640.

*Scott, for appellant.*

*Rodman, for appellee.*

Judgment *affirmed.*
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

***URANIUM RESOURCES,INC.***

405 State Highway 121 Bypass, Building A, Suite 110, Lewisville,TX 75067

972.219.3330 Phone   972.219.3311 Fax

 

August 10, 2009

 

Securities and ExchangeCommission

450 5th Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

 

I, Thomas H. Ehrlich,Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Uranium Resources, Inc.(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the period ended June 30, 2009 which this certificationaccompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| */s/* Thomas H. Ehrlich                     |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Thomas H. Ehrlich                           |   |
| Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |   |
| August 10, 2009                        |   |

 

----
11402.

#### Weathers *v.*The State.

Decided May 11, 1920.

Accusation of larceny; -from city court of Millen—'Judge Dekle. February 21, 1920.

*W. C. Henson,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. Woodrum, solicitor,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

In this case the motion for a new trial contains only the usual general grounds; the evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Historic Preservation Properties 1989
LP ("HPP'89") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HPP'89.

/s/ Terrence P. Sullivan
-----------------------------
Terrence P. Sullivan
General Partner
(Performing similar functions of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer)

Date: May 12, 2004
OSAC Registry Standards – Laboratory Implementation Declaration

Forensic Science Laboratory: _____________________________________________

Address: _________________________________________________________ 

_________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________

Declaration:

 The forensic science laboratory has implemented all of the applicable OSAC Registry Standards in 

the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Manual(s) and/or Quality Manual. 

Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Manual(s)

Quality Manual

 The forensic science laboratory has implemented the applicable OSAC Registry Standards in 

the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Manual(s) and/or Quality Manual of the following 

sections: 

SECTION REGISTRY STANDARDS

Anthropology

Bloodstain Pattern Analysis

Crime Scene Investigation

Digital Evidence

Disaster Victim Identification

DNA

Dogs and Sensors

Facial Identification

Fire and Explosion Investigation

Fire Debris and Explosives

Firearms and Toolmarks

Footwear and Tire

Forensic Document Examination

Friction Ridge

Geological Materials

Gunshot Residue

Materials (Trace)

Medicolegal Death Investigation

Odontology

Seized Drugs

Serology/General Biology

Speaker Recognition 

Toxicology

Video/Imaging Technology Analysis

Wildlife Forensics 

Other 

Laboratory Director: Date: 

November 2019
#### Delos A. Blodgett, relator v. James Whaley, highway commissioner and Asaph Vance, clerk of the township of Clam Lake.

*Laying out highway*— Desoi'iption—Notice.

An order of a highway commissioner to lay out a highway beginning at a certain point- “running nearly in a northwesterly direction near where the travel is now seeking to get the best route ” to another specific,point, is void for the uncertainty in the description.

The proceedings in laying out a highway cannot be sustained unless it appears that the statutory notice of the proceedings was given.

Certiorari.

Submitted Jan. 5.

Decided Jan. 18.

*Ghamplin & More*for relator.

Cooley, J.

The writ of *certiora/ri*in this case brings under review the proceedings on laying out. a highway in *470the township of Clam Labe. On inspection the proceedings-appear to be fatally defective for two reasons:

1. The description of the proposed route is uncertain and for that reason insufficient. In all the papers it is as follows: “In the township of Clam Lake, Wexford county, Michigan, commencing three rods south of the quarter post on the east line of section ten in said township, running-nearly in a northwesterly direction, near where the travel is-now seeking to get the best route, continuing the said highway till it gets to the limits of the city of Cadillac.” No-survey appears, and no monuments except as indicated in this description. A line “ near ” a route not yet found, but-which “ travel is now seeking,” must be as uncertain a line-as ingenuity could well suggest.

2. It does not appear’ that notice of the application to layout the highway was ever given. There is no proof of notice-on file, and plaintiff in error denies having received any. The absence of proof of notice is fatal. *Gray v. Commissioner of Highways*40 Mich. 165; *Names v. Commissioners of Highways*30 Mich. 490.

The proceedings must be quashed.

The other Justices concurred.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLCO956000 L14200000.BJ0000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of filing of plats of survey; Colorado

# SUMMARY:

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Colorado State Office is publishing this notice to inform the public of the intent to officially file the survey plat listed below and afford a proper period of time to protest this action prior to the plat filing. During this time, the plat will be available for review in the BLM Colorado State Office.

# DATES:

Unless there are protests of this action, the filing of the plat described in this notice will happen on January 12, 2015.

# ADDRESSES:

BLM Colorado State Office, Cadastral Survey, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, CO 80215-7093.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randy Bloom, Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado, (303) 239-3856.

Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.

      ( print page 73900)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The plat of Amended Protraction Diagram No. 33 in Township 48 North, Range 15 West, New Mexico Principal Meridian, Colorado, was accepted on November 17, 2014.

Randy Bloom,

Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado.

[FR Doc. 2014-29165 Filed 12-11-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER and PRINCIPAL
       FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
          OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Everest Fund, L.P.
(the "Partnership"), for the quarter ended June 30, 2014,
as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Lamoureux, President
of Everest Asset Management, Inc., the general partner of
the Everest Fund, L.P. (the "Fund"), hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Fund.




      By:  /s/ Peter Lamoureux
         ----------------------
      Name: 	Peter Lamoureux
      Title: 	Director, President and
      		Treasurer

      August 14, 2014


		E-3
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Siebert Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Joseph M. Ramos, Jr., in my capacity as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

(1) the
Report filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934; and

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the period covered by the report.

|                           |  |                      
|-------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|/s/ Joseph
  M. Ramos, Jr. |  | Date: April
  2, 2007
|                           |  |                      
|Joseph M.
  Ramos, Jr.     |  |                      
|Chief
  Financial Officer  |  |                      

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by section 906, has been provided to Siebert Financial Corp. and will be
retained by Siebert Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
##### 



Business Conduct Guidelines for Employees and Officers
of Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
 Amended on October 29, 2004
  1. Compliance with the Law and Respect for Human Rights
    2. Office Environment and Sexual Harassment
    1




---



##### 



3. Compliance with Antitrust Law, etc.
      4. Conflicts of Interest between Employees and the Company
     5. Gift and Favor
     2




---



##### 



6. Treatment of the Companys Information
       7. Compliance with Procedures for Export and Import and Other Applicable Laws
    8. Company Fund and Financial Reporting
   9. Political Donation and Other Contributions
  3




---



##### 



10. Social Contribution
   11. Protection of Environment
    12. Action against Antisocial Group
   13. Report and Sanction
   4
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 19, 2006

t0712 

# Order

July 19, 2006

130950 & (16)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130950 COA: 267703 Eaton CC: 05-020202-FC ROBERT ARNOLD HIRSCHI, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 24, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed and, it is DENI ED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand is also considered, and it is DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

###### Information Security Oversight Office

          - [NARA-2015-015]

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app 2) and implementing                               ( print page 72707)                            regulation 41 CFR 101-6, NARA announces the following committee meeting.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on January 28, 2015, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EDT.

# ADDRESSES:

National Archives and Records Administration, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Jefferson Room, Washington, DC 20408.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Robert J. Skwirot, Senior Program Analyst, by mail at ISOO, National Archives Building, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20408, by telephone number at (202) 357-5398, or by email at                         *robert.skwirot@nara.gov.*                         Contact ISOO at                         *ISOO@nara.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of this meeting is to discuss matters relating to the Classified National Security Information Program for State, Local, Tribal, and Private Sector Entities. The meeting will be open to the public. However, due to space limitations and access procedures, you must submit the name and telephone number of individuals planning to attend to the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) no later than Friday, January 23, 2015. ISOO will provide additional instructions for accessing the meeting's location.

Dated: December 2, 2014.

Patrice Little Murray,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2014-28683 Filed 12-5-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aphton Corporation
(the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick T. Mooney, M.D., Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 3, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Patrick T. Mooney, M.D.          
|                     |  |     |  | Patrick T. Mooney, M.D.              
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                     |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-9920-25-Region 6]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of a final decision on a no migration petition reissuance.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that a reissuance of an exemption to the land disposal Restrictions, under the 1984 Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, has been denied to Pergan Marshall, LLC for two Class I injection wells located at Marshall, TX. The company was unable to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Environmental Protection Agency by the petition reissuance application and supporting documentation that, to a reasonable degree of certainty, there would be no migration of hazardous constituents from the injection zone for as long as the waste remains hazardous. This final decision prohibits the underground injection by Pergan, of restricted hazardous wastes, into Class I hazardous waste injection wells WDW-180 and WDW-243. A public notice was issued October 2, 2014. The public comment period closed on November 18, 2014. No comments were received. This decision constitutes final Agency action and there is no Administrative appeal. This decision may be reviewed/appealed in compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act.

# DATES:

This action is effective as of November 24, 2014.

# ADDRESSES:

Copies of the petition reissuance and all pertinent information relating thereto are on file at the following location: Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Water Quality Protection Division, Source Water Protection Branch (6WQ-S), 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Philip Dellinger, Chief Ground Water/UIC Section, EPA—Region 6, telephone (214) 665-8324.

Dated: November 24, 2014.

William K. Honker,

Director, Water Quality Protection Division.

[FR Doc. 2014-28810 Filed 12-8-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P