alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 24.2

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     The undersigned, Brent L. Hofmeister, does hereby make, constitute and
appoint each of Jack Calderon and Stuart W. Fuhlendorf as my true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, resubstitution and
revocation to execute, deliver and file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, for and on such person's behalf, and in any and all capacities, an
Amendment No. 1 to EFTC Corporation's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File
No. 333-52137), any and all further amendments (including post-effective
amendments) thereto and any abbreviated registration statement in connection
with such Registration Statement pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities
Act of 1933, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection
therewith, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorney-in-fact and agent or such persons's substitute or substitutes may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


/s/ BRENT L. HOFMEISTER                                       May 28, 1998
---------------------------                                   
Brent L. Hofmeister
Removing 

Barriers to 

IoT Adoption

Jon Boulos
Agenda
Key Barriers
Opportunities

• Clear standards for technology providers & technology adopters

• Data standards, integration, and communication protocols

• Cybersecurity & Privacy (devices and software)

• Digital public infrastructure

• Dependable supply chain

• Public/Private partnership
The current landscape without clear standards 

is overly complex and expensive
The adoption of IoT can be 

accelerated by creating clear and 

consistent standards for 

technology providers & adopters
Cybersecurity & Privacy

Challenge:

OPPORTUNITIES

Minimum Cybersecurity 

Capabilities

Guidelines/requirements based on device 

classification

Product Labels

Help manufacturers communicate capabilities

Help adopters understand, evaluate, and compare 

cybersecurity & privacy capabilities

Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)

Enable vulnerability management programs
Data Standards & Communication Protocols

O P P O RT UNI T I E S F O R I M P ROV E ME NT – T H E “ W H AT ”

• Data Standards / Governance / Sharing

• Communication Protocols

• Clarity around data ownership and use

I M PAC T O F S O LV I N G – T H E “ W H Y ”

• Simplify and accelerate integration

• Improve device interoperability

• Reduce total cost of ownership

• Allow product teams to focus on valueadded differentiation
Digital Public Infrastructure

• Challenge:

• Opportunity:

• Digital Public Infrastructure for IoT 

• Potential drawbacks and concerns
Dependable Supply Chain

Challenge:

Supply Chain Improvement Opportunities

• Chip Availability & Component Supply

• Supply Chain Transparency & Security

• American Manufacturing
Public/Private 

Partnership

Development of standards

Facilitate data sharing

Training initiatives & education programs

Financial incentives to foster adoption and 

accelerate growth

Business transformation
Thank you!
Q&A and 

Discussion
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         159,566
<SECURITIES>                                    13,710
<RECEIVABLES>                                  254,039
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          74,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,620,262
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        924,485
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,796
<COMMON>                                        59,983
<OTHER-SE>                                     420,640
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,620,262
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               210,484
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               155,616
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,554
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,314
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,039
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,275
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,275
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        

</TABLE>
Order entered May 20, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 00002

- CV

PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS , LLC, ET AL, Appellant s
V. JOAN MCCRAY, ET AL, Appellee s On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, T exas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 11

- 09096

- M


### O RDER
By letter dated May 9, 2013, the Court requested that Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk, file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s Order on Defendant Pilot Travel Centers, LLC’s Motion for Court to Vacate Order Granting Plaintiff’s Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc. The trial court signed this order on May 1, 2013. The supplemental clerk’s record was due in this Court on May 14, 2013. As of today’s date, the requested supplemental

c lerk’s record has not been filed. Accordingly, we ORDER Gary Fitzsimmons to file, ON OR BEFORE MAY 24, 2013 , a supplemental clerk’s record containing the above

- mentioned trial court order. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order, by electronic transmission, to Mr. Fitzsimmons and all counsel of record.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
5th Meeting of the IoT Advisory Board

Agenda (times are in eastern U.S. time and are approximate) 

July 18, 2023

11:00 AM – Chair’s opening remarks including meeting agenda and anticipated outcomes for the 

meeting

11:15 AM – Outside speaker: Chris Autry, CEO, Iothic

12:00 PM - Outside speaker: Paul Eisler, Vice President, US Telecom, The Broadband Association

12:30 PM – Informal feedback from IoT Federal Working Group (Note that some members of the IoT 

Federal Working Group, using the publicly available materials that the IoT Advisory Board 

presented in May, are providing informal feedback to the IoT Advisory Board.)

1:15 PM - Break

1:30 PM - Discussion on report of draft recommendations (including consensus approvals of 

recommendations in the report)

4:45 PM - Wrap up of the day

5:00 PM - Adjourn for the day

July 19, 2023

11:00 AM – Chair’s opening remarks for the day

11:15 AM – Outside speaker: Christopher Moore 

11:45 AM - Outside speaker: Sven Dharmani, Ernst and Young

12:15 PM - Outside speaker: Mei Lin Fung, Chair. People Centered Internet 

12:45 PM - Break

1:00 PM - – Continued discussion on report draft recommendations (including consensus approvals of 

recommendations in the report)

1:30 PM - Discussion of recommendations not ready to proceed in May 

- privacy, healthcare, public safety, connectivity, and international, public safety

4:45 PM - Wrap up 

5:00 PM - Adjourn 

Anticipated meeting #5 outcomes

• Draft Report - Review and identification of any critical edits to draft report so far

• Draft Recommendations – Review and identification of any needed edits to recommendations 

in the report (note that these were accepted in principle for moving forward at the May 

meeting) 

• Recommendations that were not ready to proceed in May (privacy, healthcare, public safety, 

connectivity, and international, public safety) - Review progress and identify next steps for those 

recommendations 

• Identify gaps in report and recommendations and plans to address those gaps 

• Identify agenda topic items for Meeting 6 in August
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 72215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28578]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation

ACTION: Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 
1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Li Ling Hamady, ACA Permit Officer, 
Division of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Or by email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ddcdedcedf8eff0f4e9eeddf3eefbb3faf2eb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d2939193a2b7a0bfbba6a192bca1b4fcb5bda4">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 30, 2014 the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of a permit 
application received. The permit was issued on December 1, 2014 to:

Dr. Diana H. Wall Permit No. 2015-012

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Polar Coordination Specialist, Division of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014-28578 Filed 12-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                    APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                      JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                  2,898
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                           4,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                             2,904
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       10,292
<PP&E>                                 63,204
<DEPRECIATION>                        (31,552)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         44,440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   6,869
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                  529
<OTHER-SE>                             24,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           44,440
<SALES>                                 8,016
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        8,016
<CGS>                                   5,847
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           5,847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          917
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         1,450
<INCOME-TAX>                              387
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     1,063
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            1,063
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.27
        



</TABLE>
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned,  Anthony J. Miceli, Chief Financial
Officer of United Capital Corp.,  (the  "Company"),  does hereby  certify,  with
respect to the Annual  Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the period ended
December 31, 2005 (the "Report") that:

1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: April 28, 2006

                                     By: /s/ Anthony J. Miceli
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Anthony J. Miceli
                                         Chief Financial Officer
```
SUBROUTINE NORSF(P,SF)
C
C     PURPOSE--THIS SUBROUTINE COMPUTES THE SPARSITY
C              FUNCTION VALUE FOR THE NORMAL (GAUSSIAN)
C              DISTRIBUTION WITH MEAN = 0 AND STANDARD DEVIATION = 1. 
C              THIS DISTRIBUTION IS DEFINED FOR ALL X AND HAS
C              THE PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION
C              F(X) = (1/SQRT(2*PI))*EXP(-X*X/2). 
C              NOTE THAT THE SPARSITY FUNCTION OF A DISTRIBUTION
C              IS THE DERIVATIVE OF THE PERCENT POINT FUNCTION,
C              AND ALSO IS THE RECIPROCAL OF THE PROBABILITY
C              DENSITY FUNCTION (BUT IN UNITS OF P RATHER THAN X).
C     INPUT  ARGUMENTS--P      = THE SINGLE PRECISION VALUE 
C                                (BETWEEN 0.0 AND 1.0)
C                                AT WHICH THE SPARSITY
C                                FUNCTION IS TO BE EVALUATED.
C     OUTPUT ARGUMENTS--SF     = THE SINGLE PRECISION
C                                SPARSITY FUNCTION VALUE.
C     OUTPUT--THE SINGLE PRECISION SPARSITY
C             FUNCTION VALUE SF.
C     PRINTING--NONE UNLESS AN INPUT ARGUMENT ERROR CONDITION EXISTS. 
C     RESTRICTIONS--P SHOULD BE BETWEEN 0.0 AND 1.0, EXCLUSIVELY.
C     OTHER DATAPAC   SUBROUTINES NEEDED--NORPPF. 
C     FORTRAN LIBRARY SUBROUTINES NEEDED--EXP.
C     MODE OF INTERNAL OPERATIONS--SINGLE PRECISION.
C     LANGUAGE--ANSI FORTRAN. 
C     REFERENCES--FILLIBEN, SIMPLE AND ROBUST LINEAR ESTIMATION
C                 OF THE LOCATION PARAMETER OF A SYMMETRIC
C                 DISTRIBUTION (UNPUBLISHED PH.D. DISSERTATION,
C                 PRINCETON UNIVERSITY), 1969, PAGES 21-44, 229-231.
C               --FILLIBEN, 'THE PERCENT POINT FUNCTION',
C                 (UNPUBLISHED MANUSCRIPT), 1970, PAGES 28-31.
C               --JOHNSON AND KOTZ, CONTINUOUS UNIVARIATE
C                 DISTRIBUTIONS--1, 1970, PAGES 40-111.
C     WRITTEN BY--JAMES J. FILLIBEN
C                 STATISTICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY (205.03)
C                 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
C                 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20234
C                 PHONE:  301-921-2315
C     ORIGINAL VERSION--JUNE      1972. 
C     UPDATED         --SEPTEMBER 1975. 
C     UPDATED         --NOVEMBER  1975. 
C
C---------------------------------------------------------------------
C
      DATA C/.3989422804/
C
      IPR=6
C
C     CHECK THE INPUT ARGUMENTS FOR ERRORS
C
      IF(P.LE.0.0.OR.P.GE.1.0)GOTO50
      GOTO90
   50 WRITE(IPR,1)
      WRITE(IPR,46)P
      RETURN
   90 CONTINUE
    1 FORMAT(1H ,115H***** FATAL ERROR--THE FIRST  INPUT ARGUMENT TO THE
     1 NORSF  SUBROUTINE IS OUTSIDE THE ALLOWABLE (0,1) INTERVAL *****)
   46 FORMAT(1H , 35H***** THE VALUE OF THE ARGUMENT IS ,E15.8,6H *****)
C
C-----START POINT-----------------------------------------------------
C
      CALL NORPPF(P,PPF)
      PDF=C*EXP(-(PPF*PPF)/2.0)
      SF=1.0/PDF
C
      RETURN
      END
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4602

To authorize the subdivision and dedication of restricted land owned by 

Alaska Natives. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2004

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To authorize the subdivision and dedication of restricted 

land owned by Alaska Natives.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alaska Native Allot5 ment Subdivision Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) RESTRICTED LAND.—The term ‘‘restricted 

9 land’’ means land in the State that is subject to 

10 Federal restrictions against alienation and taxation. 
2

•HR 4602 IH 

1 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of the Interior. 

3 (3) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State 

4 of Alaska. 

5 SEC. 3. SUBDIVISION AND DEDICATION OF ALASKA NATIVE 

6 RESTRICTED LAND. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—An Alaska Native owner of re8 stricted land may, subject to the approval of the Sec9 retary—

10 (1) subdivide the restricted land in accordance 

11 with the laws of the—

12 (A) State; or 

13 (B) applicable local platting authority; and 

14 (2) execute a certificate of ownership and dedi15 cation with respect to the restricted land subdivided 

16 under paragraph (1) with the same effect under 

17 State law as if the restricted land subdivided and 

18 dedicated were held by unrestricted fee simple title. 

19 (b) RATIFICATION OF PRIOR SUBDIVISIONS AND

20 DEDICATIONS.—Any subdivision or dedication of re21 stricted land executed before the date of enactment of this 

22 Act that has been approved by the Secretary and by the 

23 relevant State or local platting authority, as appropriate, 

24 shall be considered to be ratified and confirmed by Con-
3

•HR 4602 IH 

1 gress as of the date on which the Secretary approved the 

2 subdivision or dedication. 

3 SEC. 4. EFFECT ON STATUS OF LAND NOT DEDICATED. 

4 Except in a case in which a specific interest in re5 stricted land is dedicated under section 3(a)(2), nothing 

6 in this Act terminates, diminishes, or otherwise affects the 

7 continued existence and applicability of Federal restric8 tions against alienation and taxation on restricted land or 

9 interests in restricted land (including restricted land sub10 divided under section 3(a)(1)).

Æ
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4677 

To name the lake known as Falls Lake in North Carolina after United 

States Senator Jesse Helms. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2004 

Mr. JONES of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To name the lake known as Falls Lake in North Carolina 

after United States Senator Jesse Helms. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JESSE HELMS LAKE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The lake described in subsection 

5 (b) and known as Falls Lake shall be known and des6 ignated as ‘‘Jesse Helms Lake’’. 

7 (b) LAKE DESCRIBED.—The lake referred to in sub8 section (a) is— 

9 (1) north of the northern boundary of Raleigh, 

10 North Carolina; 
2 

•HR 4677 IH 

1 (2) located along a 21 mile stretch of the Neuse 

2 River, which runs in a northwest to southeast direc3 tion; 

4 (3) approximately 11 miles wide at its widest 

5 point; and 

6 (4) centered at 36 degrees 1.75 minutes North, 

7 78 degrees 43.25 minutes West. 

8 (c) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula9 tion, document, record, map, or other paper of the United 

10 States to the lake referred to in subsection (a) is deemed 

11 to be a reference to Jesse Helms Lake. 

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                          CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-47577) of Queen Sand Resources, Inc. and in the
related Prospectus of our report dated September 2, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Queen Sand Resources included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended June 30, 1998.



                                                  ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Dallas, Texas
September 18, 1998
Exhibit 10.50
 YYB Share Transfer Agreement
   th
   1.
    
    Conditions for signing this agreement:
 1.1
    
    party A transfers YYBs 100% shareholding, all tangible
and intangible assets;
 1.2
    
    party B is responsible for the debt liabilities as indicated in debt statement in appendix2;
other debts besides appendix 2 shall be taken by party A;
 1.3
    
    party B shall pay the loans and interests at ICBC pledged by the plant facilities of No.245
Avenue Tumen, and land use right;
 2.
    
    according to article 1 in this agreement, party A transfer 100% shareholding of YYB to party
B; party B agrees to take over party As 100% shareholding of YYB.
 3.
    
    party A guarantees that the shares transferred to party B is legally owned by party A, and
party A has complete and efficient disposition right. Otherwise, party A shall take all the
economic and legal liabilities incurred by the disposition. Within one month upon signing this
agreement, party A shall deliver the qualification notary certificates for signing this
agreement to party B.
 4.
    
    the payment method and time for party B to pay the debt listed in appendix 2 shall be agreed
between party B and various debtors. The payment method and time for party B to pay back the
bank loan and interests in total of RMB16million shall be agreed between party B and the bank.
 5.
    
    Party A has reminded the fact that relevant real estate and land use right have been pledged
at the bank; party B completely noticed that fact this fact, and take the legal liability for
it.
 6.
    
    upon signing this agreement, party A shall immediately pass YYBs business license to party
B, and WOFE certificate and all relevant GMP and other licenses.
 1




---



##### 



7.
    
    party B shall be responsible for relevant registration fee. Party a will assist in providing
relevant documents.
 8.
    
    within 30 days upon signing this agreement, party A will be responsible for cancellation
registration of YYB as a subsidiary to the US public company.
 9.
    
    once this agreement takes effect, either party breaches the agreement and prohibited the
share transfer, the default party shall pay the other party RMB2million fee. The default party
shall compensate the other party for its economic lose made by the default.
 Party A: JJB 
Legal Representative: Xia YuanDa
    
    Party B: Liu Kai
Legal Representative: Liu Kai/s/ Xia YuanDa
    
    /s/ Liu KaiDate: June 25, 2009
 2