alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the matter of the estate of Denis J. Campau, on appeal of Alexander T. Campau.

*Appeal from confirmation of acbgiinistratoi'’s sale.*

If proceedings for the confirmation of an administrator’s sale can be appealed from the probate to the circuit court, the issue remains the same and no new issue can be introduced in the circuit.

The question whether a fair price was realized for property sold at administrator’s sale cannot be raised for the first time after confirmation of the sale and on appeal from the order confirming it, if such an appeal can be taken.

Certiorari to Wayne Circuit Court.

Submitted April T.

Decided April 25.

Appeal by an heir at law from an order of the probate ■court confirming an administrator’s sale. The appellant brings the case up on *certiorari.*

Affirmed.

*Moore dc Moore*and *Da/niel J. Campau*for plaintiff in certiorari.

*John H. JBissell*and *Hoyt Post*for the administrator.

An appeal from an order of confirmation can raise'the questions only that were before the tribunal making the order: *Delaplaine v. Lawrence*3 N. Y. 301.

Marston, J.

We shall not express any opinion at present, ■as to whether this class of eases can be appealed from the probate to the circuit court. If an appeal will lie, the issue in the circuit must be the same as in the probate court. In this case the record shows that the appellant opposed the confirmation of the sale in the probate court, and that after the sale was confirmed, he tendered in that court a bond with sufficient sureties conditioned to bid ten per cent, in excess of the amount for which the premises were sold. The appeal was afterwards taken and the effort made in the circuit was to show that the land did not bring its fair value *237and that another sale should be ordered. The objection-made in the probate court to a confirmation, was upon the case as it then stood, and no examination was made or attempted as to the value of the property.

The matters litigated in the circuit were not raised in the probate court at all — indeed the effect of giving such a bond does not seem to have been passed upon by that court at all-Now if the parties opposing the sale could thus, after the confirmation, file such a bond and take an appeal and thus-raise a new issue thereon, it- is very evident that difficult and serious questions might arise tending to delay and embarrass the administrator i-n a settlement of the estate. The hearing or trial in the circuit would not be as upon appeal, but would be the trial of a new issue presented for the first time in that court.

The proceedings must therefore be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.
<TABLE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21

                      LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


    COMPANY NAME                         STATE OF INCORPORATION/ORGANIZATION
    <S>                                                <C>
1.  Mississippi Phosphates Corporation                 Delaware
2.  Mississippi Potash, Inc.                          Mississippi
3.  Eddy Potash, Inc.                                 Mississippi
4.  Mississippi Nitrogen, Inc.                         Delaware
5.  MissChem Nitrogen, L.L.C.                          Delaware
6.  Triad Nitrogen, L.L.C.                             Delaware
7.  TNI Barge, Inc.                                    Delaware
8.  MCC Investments, Inc.                              Delaware
9.  Mississippi Chemical Management                    Delaware
    Company
10. Mississippi Chemical Company, L.P.                 Delaware
11. Mississippi Chemical Holdings, Inc.         British Virgin Islands
12. MissChem (Barbados) SRL                Barbados Society With Restricted
                                                      Liability
13. MissChem Trinidad Limited                          Trinidad

</TABLE>
New Hire Guide for completing New Hire Questionnaire and OF-306

Step 1: Accept the Tentative Offer

Click Continue and this will be your next screen:
Click Start and you will see this Task page:

Step 2: Complete the New Hire Questionnaire first. That will populate the information on the OF-306 for 

your electronic signature. When you click to Complete New Hire Questionnaire, your screen will look like 

this:
Step 3: Complete each Questionnaire within this task, mark the Completion Date, and Close. Once you 

have completed the New Hire Questionnaire, you will need to click the Task for Complete OF-306.

Click on the Form Name:
You will see this screen pop up:

The form is read-only because it is pre-populated with the answers you provided in the Questionnaires. 

If any information on the form is incorrect, then you need to correct the appropriate Questionnaire and 

come back. 
Step 4: Scroll to the bottom of the screen and verify if you are able to view the form by clicking Confirm. 

Once you click Confirm, it will then have a button to Sign and Submit. 

Step 5: Click Sign and Submit. This will electronically sign the form for you.

Step 6: Review the information on the next screen and click I Agree if you agree.
You will receive another pop-up screen that will say this:

You can Close and then your Task page should look like this:

You have completed your tasks and they are now ready for Human Resources to review!
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<CIK>                         0000066052
<NAME>                        AMERICAN MIDLAND CORPORATION



<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                          27,000
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,000
<PP&E>                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,027,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           464,000
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        57,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      506,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,027,000
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                0
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    0
<EPS-BASIC>                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2





---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IEA Income Fund IX, L.P. on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John
Kallas, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Cronos Capital Corp. (CCC) and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer of the CCC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (i)  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                              
| | ---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Company.
|
| |      |  | August 13, 2002                                                                                                                                    

| |                                                                                                                                    |                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------
| |                                                                                                                                    | /s/ John Kallas
| |                                                                                                                                   
| | John Kallas
Chief Financial Officer and
Director of Cronos Capital Corp.
(CCC)
Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer of CCC
Quality Infrastructure

Committee (QIC)

Karin Athanas, Chair
Quality 

Infrastructure 

Resource 

Committee 

Members

Karin Athanas, Committee Chair

Jason Bond, Committee Vice Chair, Accreditation and Quality 

Assurance Manager, Indiana State Police Laboratory Division

Christopher Krug, Committee Executive Secretary, Quality Assurance 

Manager, Johnson County Sheriff's Office Criminalistics Laboratory

Barbara E. Andree, Forensic Chemist, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 

Firearms and Explosives

Jason Bundy, Biology Technical Leader, Florida Department of Law 

Enforcement

Rita C. Dyas, Chandler P.D. Forensic Services Section

Matthew Gamette, Laboratory System Director, Idaho State Police 

Forensic Services

Bruce Houlihan, Director, Orange County Crime Laboratory/Orange 

County Sheriff-Coroner, Representative to Chemistry/Instrumental 

Analysis SAC

2
Quality 

Infrastructure 

Resource 

Committee 

Members

Jan L. Johnson, Illinois State Police, Forensic Sciences Command

Timothy Kupferschmid, Chief of Laboratories, New York City Office 

of Chief Medical Examiner, Representative to Biology/DNA SAC

Eric G. Pokorak, FBI Laboratory

Frances E. Schrotter, Sr. Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, 

American National Standards Institute

Blythe Toma, Allegheny County Office of the Medical Examiner

Shannan Williams, Forensic Science Research Project Manager, 

National Institute of Standards and Technology

3
The QIC acts as a resource to 

OSAC members on quality 

issues, interface with 

standards development 

organizations, accreditation 

bodies, and certification 

bodies, and maintain the 

OSAC Registry, OSAC Catalog 

of related standards, and the 

OSAC Lexicon.
OSAC QIC 

The 

“Day-to-Day”

5

Reviewing Documents 

Comment Adjudication

Appeals

Impact Statements 

OSAC Lexicon, Registry, and Catalog

Liaison Activities
2019

QIC 

Activities

OSAC Lexicon

OSAC Preferred Terms

Impact Statements

Community Engagement

ISO/IEC 17025:2017

6
Thank you

https://www.nist.gov/topics/organization-scientific-area-committees-forensic-science
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                  --------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in millions)                              2001       2000       1999       1998       1997
                                                  ------     ------     ------     ------     ------
<S>                                               <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Income before taxes                               $2,778     $1,904     $2,520     $2,150     $2,018
Interest expense (net of amounts capitalized)        612        548        403        386        374
Interest factor on rentals (1/3)                     108        109         78         56         67
                                                  ------     ------     ------     ------     ------
Earnings available for fixed charges              $3,498     $2,561     $3,001     $2,592     $2,459
                                                  ======     ======     ======     ======     ======
Interest expense                                  $  659     $  600     $  430     $  411     $  394
Interest factor on rentals (1/3)                     108        109         78         56         67
                                                  ------     ------     ------     ------     ------
Fixed charges                                     $  767     $  709     $  508     $  467     $  461
                                                  ======     ======     ======     ======     ======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                  4.56       3.61       5.91       5.55       5.33
                                                  ======     ======     ======     ======     ======
</Table>
EXHIBIT (23)



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT











The Board of Directors
Paul Mueller Company

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-88188 and No. 333-78321) on Form S-8 of Paul Mueller Company of our report dated March 5, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Paul Mueller Company and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' investment, and cash flows for the years then ended and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of Paul Mueller Company.



Our report refers to our audit of the restatement adjustments that were applied as a result in the change in the composition of its reportable segments to restate the 2001 financial statements, which were audited by other auditors who ceased operations, as more fully described in Note 7 to the financial statements.  However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2001 financial statements other than with respect to such adjustments.

KPMG LLP

/S/   KPMG LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
March 25, 2004

10-K & EXHIBITS - PAGE 172
exv4w6



 










EXHIBIT 4.6




Amendment No. 1 to

Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.

1997 Stock Incentive Plan




     This Amendment No. 1 to the Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”) is made to be effective as of the 28th day of October, 2004 (“Amendment”).



RECITALS:




     WHEREAS, the Plan was originally adopted by the Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. (the
“Company”) Board of Directors on August 5, 1997 and approved by the shareholders of the Company on
December 16, 1997; and



     WHEREAS, Section 3 of the Plan provides a formula that permits the Company’s Board of
Directors to periodically increase the number of shares available for issuance pursuant to the
Plan; and



     WHEREAS, pursuant to the new corporate governance standards of the New York Stock Exchange
(“NYSE”) contained in Section 303A of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual, any equity compensation
plan that contains a formula for automatic increases in the number of shares available is a
“formula plan” and each increase in shares available under a “formula plan” will be considered a
material revision requiring shareholder approval unless the plan has a term of not more than ten
years; and



     WHEREAS, Section 303A.08 states that an amendment to limit a current plan to a term of no more
than 10 years, whether made prior to or after the effective date of the listing standard, would not
be a “material revision” requiring shareholder approval; and



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has on this date approved an amendment to the Plan such that
the Plan will terminate no later than December 1, 2007.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Company hereby amends the Plan as
follows:



     Section 1. Amendment to Section 6 of the Plan. Section 6 is hereby replaced in its
entirety with the following:




     “6. TERM OF PLAN. Subject to any applicable law and the provisions of Section
19 hereof, the Plan shall terminate no later than December 1, 2007.”



     Section 2. No Effect on Consistent Terms. All terms of the Plan not inconsistent with
this Amendment shall remain in place and in full force and effect and shall be unaffected by this
Amendment.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Amendment as of the date first
written above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	 	    /s/ WAYNE R. LEWIS
 	 
	 	Name:  	Wayne R. Lewis 	 
	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President & Assistant Secretary
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 21.



              Subsidiaries of the Company (state of incorporation)


Advance Paradigm Mail Services, Inc. (Delaware)

Advance Paradigm Data Services, Inc. (Delaware)

Advance Paradigm Clinical Services, Inc. (Maryland)

Innovative Medical Research, Inc. (Maryland)
Exhibit 99.1

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, J. Russell Duncan, the Chief Executive Officer of Milastar Corporation and Subsidiaries (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
April 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

**/s/J. Russell Duncan**

Title: Chief Executive Officer, Milastar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Dated: July 28, 2003

I, Dennis J. Stevermer, the Chief Financial Officer of Milastar Corporation and Subsidiaries (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that the Company' s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended April 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

**/s/Dennis J. Stevermer**

Title: Chief Financial Officer,Milastar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Dated:July 28, 2003
POWER OF ATTORNEY

      We, the undersigned directors of Questar Gas Company, hereby
severally constitute D. N. Rose and S. E. Parks, and each of them acting
alone, our true and lawful attorneys, with full power to them and each
of them to sign for us, and in our names in the capacities indicated
below, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1999 and any and all
amendments to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by
Questar Gas Company, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as
they may be signed by the attorneys appointed herein to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for 1999 and any and all amendments to such Report.

      Witness our hands on the respective dates set forth below.

     Signature                          Title              Date


 /s/ R. D. Cash                 Chairman of the Board     2-8-00
R. D. Cash


 /s/ D. N. Rose                   President & Chief       2-8-00
D. N. Rose                        Executive Officer
                                      Director

 /s/ W. Whitley Hawkins               Director            2-8-00
W. Whitley Hawkins


 /s/ Robert E. Kadlec                 Director            2-8-00
Robert E. Kadlec


 /s/ Dixie L. Leavitt                 Director            2-8-00
Dixie L. Leavitt


 /s/ Gary G. Michael                  Director            2-8-00
Gary G. Michael


 /s/ Harris H. Simmons                Director             2-8-00
Harris H. Simmons
No. 15,402.

#### Pickett *v.*The Toledo, St. Louis and Kansas City Railroad Company.

*Trespass.*— Tortious *Entry upon Lands.*— Statute *of Limitations.*— Change *of Ownership.*— Railroad.—An action for damages for a tortious entry upon lands by a railroad company must be brought within six years after the cause of action has accrued. The action will not lie where there has been a change of ownership since the original trespass, and suit was brought more than six years after the commission of the trespass, but less than six years after the defendant succeeded in ownership to the original trespasser. Section 292, it. S. 1881.

From the Tipton Circuit Court.

*563Filed May 12, 1892.

*J. C. Blacklidge, W. E. Blacklidge, O. G. Shirley*and *B. C. Moon,*for appellant.

*S. O. Bayless, C. G. Guenther*and C. *Brown,*for appellee.

McBride, J.

The complain! in this case alleges a tortious entry upon certain lands belonging to the appellant by a predecessor of the appellee and the construction of a line of railroad thereon, which it is alleged is still maintained by the appellee as successor in ownership to the original trespasser. The appellee answered that the cause of action did not accrue within six years prior to the bringing of the suit. The appellant replied, admitting that the original trespass was committed more than six years before the commencement of the suit, but that the suit was commenced less than six years after the appellee succeeded to the ownership and possession of the line of railway, and that the operation of the road had been a continuing injury and damage to the land. The court sustained a demurrer to this paragraph of reply. This ruling presents the only question in the record. If the cause of action stated in the complaint is one that is barred by the six years statute of limitations the ruling of the circuit court was right.

The question may be regarded as settled by several decisions of this court, holding that when the action is brought, as in this case, to recover damages for the trespass, section 292, R. S. 1881, applies. That section provides that actions for injury to property, damages for any detention thereof, etc., must be brought within six years after the cause of áction has accrued. The cause of action accrues when the unlawful entry is made. *Strickler*v. *Midland R. W. Co.,*125 Ind. *412; Porter*v. *Midland R. W. Co.,*125 Ind. 476; *Shortle*v. *Terre Haute, etc., R. R. Co., ante,*p. 338. The running of the statute is not affected by the change in ownership of the railway.

Judgment affirmed with costs.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Anthony E. Applebaum, Chief Executive Officer of Mera Pharmaceuticals, certify that (1) Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 3 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.





Date:   September 14, 2010





/s/ANTHONY E. APPLEBAUM


----------------------------------------


Anthony E. Applebaum


Principal Financial and Accounting Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.