alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### The Honorable George F. Gunn, Jr., United States District 1 

### Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. ___________ No. 96-1569

___________ Nicky Harding, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Paul D. Caspari; Unknown * Eastern District of Missouri. Ramacciotti; Keith Boyd; Mary * Moore; James M. Ruman; Raif J. * [UNPUBLISHED] Salfe; Correctional Medical * Services; Shirley McClary, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 4, 1996 Filed: September 16, 1996

___________ Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Missouri inmate Nicky Har ding appeals the district court's grant of 1 summaryjudgment in favor of defendants in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After de novo review of the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude th e district court's grant of summary judgment was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny appellant's motion for appointment of counsel.

### -2- A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
---

Exhibit 32.1


MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)




The undersigned, Laura B. Hamilton, the Chief Executive Officer of MTS Systems Corporation (the "Company"), has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2010 (the "Report").




The undersigned hereby certifies that:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.




Date: November 30, 2010




/s/ LAURA B. HAMILTONLaura B. HamiltonChair and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit32.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Annual Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Darrell B. Lee, Chief Financial Officer ofMOCON, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best ofmy knowledge:

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of MOCON, Inc.

Date: March 30, 2007
|   | /s/ Darrell B. Lee      |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Darrell B. Lee          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-60184

Summary Calendar

ALBERTICO IBARRA

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A018 950 395

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Albertico Ibarra, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the

order reinstating his 1999 deportation order. He avers that his due process and

equal protection rights were violated during his prior removal hearing because

(1) the immigration judge (IJ) did not inform him of his eligibility for any form

of relief from removal and (2) counsel did not timely file applications for

discretionary relief and did not challenge the criminal grounds for his

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 27, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-60184 Document: 00511332798 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/27/2010
No. 10-60184

removability. Ibarra also challenges a 2009 indictment charging him with

illegally reentering the United States after his prior removal. Ibarra’s challenge

to the indictment in his underlying reentry case is premature because the

district court has not reached a final disposition in that case. Ibarra remains free

to raise any defenses in the course of that criminal proceeding.

This court reviews questions of law as to jurisdiction de novo. See RamirezMolina v. Ziglar, 436 F.3d 508, 513 (5th Cir. 2006). The REAL ID Act did not

alter the jurisdictional requirements that: (1) administrative remedies must be

exhausted prior to seeking judicial review of a removal order and (2) a collateral

1

attack on a prior deportation order may be considered by this court only if the

initial deportation proceedings involved a gross miscarriage of justice. Id. at 514.

Ibarra cannot establish a gross miscarriage of justice in his underlying

removal proceeding because he conceded his removability and failed to appeal

the IJ’s 1999 removal order before the Board of Immigration Appeals and this

court. See id. Moreover, Ibarra affirmatively declined to make a statement

contesting the reinstatement determination. As Ibarra has not demonstrated

that there was a gross miscarriage of justice, we lack jurisdiction to consider his

collateral challenges to the underlying removal order, and the petition is

dismissed on that basis. See id. at 514-15.

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

A court may review a final order of removal only if “the alien has exhausted all 1

administrative remedies available to the alien as of right.” 8 U.S.C. 1252(d).

2

Case: 10-60184 Document: 00511332798 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/27/2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     MARCH 31, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MAGNITUDE INFORMATION
     SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>            0000838796
<NAME>           Magnitude Information Systems, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                         1,427,184
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    226,719
<ALLOWANCES>                                      76,111
<INVENTORY>                                        8,885
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,209,037
<PP&E>                                           261,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                   153,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,551,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,508,695
<BONDS>                                          387,895
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                          294
<COMMON>                                           1,459
<OTHER-SE>                                       653,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,551,823
<SALES>                                          100,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 100,022
<CGS>                                             40,934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    267,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 522,286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               109,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (783,497)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (783,497)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (783,497)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.06)




</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Effective date:*                         December 9, 2014.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 2, 2014, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Express Contract 21 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov*, Docket Nos. MC2015-14, CP2015-17.                

Stanley F. Mires,

Attorney, Federal Requirements.

[FR Doc. 2014-28740 Filed 12-8-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28986]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

December 5, 2014.

TIME AND DATE:  10:00 a.m., Thursday, December 18, 2014.

PLACE:  The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street 
entrance).

STATUS:  Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  The Commission will hear oral argument in 
the matter Secretary of Labor v. Small Mine Development, Docket Nos. 
WEST 2011-1351-M, et al. (Issues include whether the Administrative Law 
Judge erred in concluding that a refuge must be installed during 
exploration or development of an ore body when the operator decides not 
to construct a second escapeway.)
    Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and Sec.  2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO:  Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 
708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sarah L. Stewart,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-28986 Filed 12-5-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

 ) 

 Respondent, ) 

 ) CRIMINAL NO. 08-0067-CG-N 

 ) 

 ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-0216-CG-N 

PAUL ANTONIO BURKE, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant/Petitioner, ) 

ORDER

 

After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this file, and a de novo

determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which 

objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made 

under 28 U.S.C. ' 636 is adopted as the opinion of this Court. 

 It is ORDERED that the government’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, 

that petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 is DISMISSED with prejudice, and that petitioner is not entitled to 

issuance of a certificate of appealability or an order granting leave to appeal the 

judgment in this case in forma pauperis. 

 DONE and ORDERED this the 16th day of September, 2011. 

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Case 1:08-cr-00067-CG-N Document 113 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FRESH FOODS,
INC.'S 1998 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-27-1998
<CASH>                                       2,818,071
<SECURITIES>                                   206,706
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,036,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                   106,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,361,347
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,307,895
<PP&E>                                      71,555,653
<DEPRECIATION>                              26,531,860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              71,655,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,805,279
<BONDS>                                     15,812,933
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,898,449
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,328,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,226,988
<SALES>                                    158,411,561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           158,411,561
<CGS>                                       93,017,228
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              132,813,541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,004,310
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               300,979
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,762,363
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,978,008
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,728,008
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,250,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,250,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              19
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,150
<PP&E>                                          39,708
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,531
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (41,448)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,083
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,255
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,255)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,255)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,255)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.001)
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 14, 2018

No. 04-18-00425-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.J.O., A CHILD,

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-PA-00377

The Honorable Todd Alexander Blomerth, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellee’s motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED IN PART. 

Time is extended to October 2, 2018.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of September, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Filed 11/6/15 Rosenberg v. Reid CA2/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

SHERYL ROSENBERG

,

Plaintiff and Appellant

,

v.

BRIGE TTE REID

,

Defendant and Respondent. B262854

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. BP140257 )

APPEAL from a n order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,

Clifford L. Klein , Judge

. Affirmed

.

Greenberg Traurig and Frank E. Merideth, Jr. for Pla intiff and Appellant

.

Loeb & Loeb, Gabrielle A. Vidal, Rachel J. Harris, and Amy L. Koch for

Defendant and Respondent.

_____________________2 DISPOSITION

By stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the order awarding

Defendant and Responde nt Brigette Reid attorney fees in the amount of $30,222.50 is

summarily affirmed

. Reid is entitled to costs on appeal.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

JONES , J. *

We concur:

EDMON

, P. J.

ALDRICH , J.

* Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to

article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
Schedule of Employment Agreements



 EXHIBIT 10(a)(3) 
  
 SCHEDULE OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS 
  

			
	 	  	Form of
Contract


	William F. Schwer	  	A
	Robert A. Peiser	  	B
#### James Abbott *v.*H. B. Letteral et al.

Deeds — Registration—Acceptance—Presumption—Burden of Proof.

The registration, of a deed is presumptive evidence of its acceptance by the grantee, and the burden of proof is on the party denying acceptance.

Appeal — Renewal—Failure to Describe Land.

A judgment which gives no description of the land attached to be sold, but requires' the commissioner making the sale to look to ’ the petition or other pleading for that purpose, must be reversed.

APPEAL FROM CARTER CIRCUIT COURT.

January 28, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The registration of the deed is presumptive evidence of its acceptance by the grantee, and the burden of proof was therefore on the appellant to make good this defense. It is the duty of the grantor to execute and deliver the deed and the grantee to have it recorded.

Neither the answer nor the amended answer contained any allegation requiring a response, except for the small item for which credit was given in the judgment. The original answer contains *471in substance the same defense set up in the amendment; and still the appellant at no time attempted to sustain his defense by proof. The judgment, however, must be reversed, as it gave no description whatever of the land directed to be sold, but requires the commissioner to look to the petition or some other pleading for that purpose.

*E. B. Wilhoit, for appellant.*

*Davis, for appellees.*

The judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
1The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2858

___________

United States of America, For The Use *

Of Weathercraft Company of Grand *

Island, a Nebraska Corporation, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Roland Glessner, an individual; *

Quality Trust, Inc., a Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: March 5, 1999

 Filed: March 24, 1999

___________

Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Roland Glessner and Quality Trust, Inc. appeal from the district court’s1

adverse grant of summary judgment for the United States “for the use of”

Weathercraft Co. in a Miller Act and state law breach-of-contract action. After a
-2-

careful review of the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude that no error

of law appears and an extended discussion is unnecessary.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.