alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.8  


 
 

Schedule of
  Water Pik Technologies, Inc.
  Executive Officer Base Salaries
  October 23, 2001 to December 1, 2005    
    



	Executive Officer Name
 
	 	Effective Date
	 	Base Annual Salary

	

Michael P. Hoopis

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director	
 	

*

07/01/2002

07/01/2003

06/28/2004

07/03/2005	
 	
$
$
$
$
$	

450,000

480,000

510,000

535,000

555,000
	

Robert A. Shortt

Executive Vice President, Sales, Marketing

and Business Development	
 	

*

04/28/2002

04/01/2003

03/28/2004

03/20/2005	
 	
$
$
$
$
$	

260,000

275,000

286,000

297,444

308,000
	

Victor C. Streufert

Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer

and Treasurer	
 	

*

04/06/2002

04/01/2003

03/28/2004

03/20/2005	
 	
$
$
$
$
$	

240,000

255,000

270,300

285,000

297,000
	

Richard P. Bisson

Vice President, Operations	
 	

*

03/01/2002

03/01/2003

03/01/2004

03/06/2005	
 	
$
$
$
$
$	

201,406

221,540

232,617

250,000

260,000
	

Robert J. Rasp

Vice President and General Manager, Pool Products	
 	

*

10/01/2002

09/01/2003

09/01/2004

09/04/2005	
 	
$
$
$
$
$	

208,021

216,342

240,000

252,000

262,080
	

Theresa Hope-Reese

Vice President, Human Resources	
 	

*

10/10/2002

10/14/2003

10/10/2004

10/16/2005	
 	
$
$
$
$
$	

196,100

207,868

220,000

230,000

240,000
	

Richard D. Tipton

Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary	
 	

*

12/13/2002

12/16/2003

12/13/2004

03/06/2005	
 	
$
$
$
$
$	

190,800

202,268

215,000

225,000

240,000






	*
	Base
salary in effect at time of each officer's employment agreement dated October 23, 2001 with WPTI 











QuickLinks


Schedule of Water Pik Technologies, Inc. Executive Officer Base Salaries October 23, 2001 to December 1, 2005
EXHIBIT 24.2          I, Debra A. Bollwage, Senior Assistant Secretary of Merck & Co., Inc. (the “Company”), acorporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, do herebycertify that the following is a true copy of a resolution adopted by Unanimous Written Consent ofthe Board of Directors of said Company on February 22, 2007 in accordance with the provisions ofthe By-Laws of said Company:     “Special Resolution No.     - 2007     RESOLVED, that the proposed form of Form 10-K Annual Report of the Company for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2006 attached hereto is hereby approved with such changes asthe proper officers of the Company, with the advice of counsel, deem appropriate; and     RESOLVED, that each officer and director who may be required to execute the aforesaidForm 10-K Annual Report or any amendments thereto (whether on behalf of the Company or as anofficer or director thereof, or by attesting the seal of the Company, or otherwise) ishereby authorized to execute a power of attorney appointing Celia A. Colbert and Kenneth C.Frazier and each of them, severally, his/her true and lawful attorney or attorneys toexecute in his/her name, place and stead (in any such capacity) such Form 10-K Annual Reportand any and all amendments thereto and any and all exhibits and other documents necessary orincidental in connection therewith and to file the same with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, each of said attorneys to have power to act with or without the others, and tohave full power and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of each of saidofficers and directors, or both, as the case may be, every act whatsoever necessary oradvisable to be done in the premises as fully and to all intents and purposes as any suchofficer or director might or could do in person.”          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my signature and affixed the seal of theCompany this 28th day of February 2007.        [Corporate Seal] /s/ Debra A. Bollwage   Debra A. Bollwage   Senior Assistant Secretary
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 5, 2020

b0129 

# Order

Clerk February 5, 2020

160535

In re INGRAM, Minors. SC: 160535

COA: 347801

Wayne CC Family Div:

17

- 001387

- NA

__________________ ________________________ /

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 15, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the Court of Appeals judgment. We REMAND

this case to that court which, while retaining jurisdiction, shall remand this case to the

Wayne Circuit Court Family Division for that co urt to reconsider its December 3, 201 8

order terminating respondent’s parental rights to LJI and LMI. The circuit court shall be

directed to specifically address: (1) whether there is a statutory basis to terminate

respondent’s parental rights to LJI and LMI, see In re JK , 468 Mich 202, 210 (2003); and

(2) whether termination is in LJI’s and LMI’s best interests, taking into consideration,

am ong other evidence, respondent’s efforts towards sobriety, see In re Moss , 301 Mich

App 76, 90 (2013). The circuit court may, in its discretion, receive proofs or hold an

evidentiary hearing. The circuit court shall be directed to forward to the Court of Appeals

a written opinion addressing the above issues within 42 days of the Court of Ap peals

remand order. The Court of Appeals shall its consideration of this case.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
#### Fitzgerald *v.*Cox et al.

*Witness*—Note Assigned by*Administrator.—In an action by an: assignee of the administratrix of an estate, on a promissory note executed to the decedent, and assigned under the statute to the plaintiff asan heir, the maker of the note is not a competent witness to prove payment of the note to the decedent.

APPEAL from the Marion Common Pleas.

Buskirk, C. J.

This was an action by the appellant, as assignee of Sarah W. Fitzgerald, administratrix of the estate of J. H. Fitzgerald, deceased, upon a note executed by the appellee John F. Cox, payable to the said decedent, for the sum of one hundred dollars.

There was issue, trial by jury, finding for defendants, motion for new trial made, overruled, and excepted to.

Various errors have been assigned and argued by counsel, but it will only be necessary to notice one of them, and that question arises upon the alleged error of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial. The facts are these; John F. Cox, on the 17th day of November, 1862, executed his note to John H. Fitzgerald, who has since departed this life. Sarah W. Fitzgerald administered upon the estate of said decedent. After the payment of the debts of said administration she assigned the note to the appellant, who was one of the heirs of the said decedent. The assignment was made by virtue of section 114 of the act for the settlement of decedents’ estates. 2 G. & H. 518.

This action was brought upon said note by the assignee thereof. The defendant Cox pleaded payment of the note in the lifetime of the decedent. Upon the trial of the cause, the court, over the objection and exception of the appellant, permitted the appellee Cox to testify in reference to the payment of said note. This was assigned as one of the reasons for a new trial. The court erred in permitting the appellee Cox to testify as a witness. He was clearly incompetent, as was held by this court at the present term, in the case of *Peacock*v. *Albin, ante,*p. 25. The ruling in *85this case is based upon the decision in the above case. For this error the judgment must be reversed.

*A. F.*Denny, for appellant.

*% E.*Heller; *% T. Dye,*and *A. C. Hams,*for appellees.

The judgment is reversed, with costs; and the cause is remanded, with directions for a new trial, and for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-78,769-03

IN RE RANDY HENDERSON, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 03-F-0146-202 IN THE 202 DISTRICT COURT ND

FROM BOWIE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus pursuant

to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed a motion for judgment nunc

pro tunc on or about October 20, 2014, and the trial court has not taken action on the motion. Relator

presented his claim to the Sixth Court of Appeals, but was denied relief. In re Randy Henderson, No.

06-15-00034-CR (Tex. App.—Texarkana Mar. 10, 2015) (not designated for publication). A trial

court has a ministerial duty to rule “upon a motion that is properly and timely presented to it for a

ruling.” State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist., 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007).

Relator has alleged facts which, if true, could entitle him to mandamus relief. 
2

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the Judge of the 202nd

District Court of Bowie County, shall file a response addressing whether Relator has properly filed

a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc in that court. If relator has filed such a motion, the respondent

shall address whether the motion has been ruled upon and, if the motion has not been ruled upon,

the respondent shall discuss the rationale for not taking action on the motion. Respondent’s answer

shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order. This application for leave to file a writ

of mandamus will be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted his response.

Filed: August 26, 2015

Do not publish
11092.

#### Mathews *et al. v.*Green.

Decided March 4, 1920.

Affidavit of illegality; from city court of Statesboro — Judge Proctor. October 17, 1919.

BLOODWORTH, J.

The affidavit of illegality in this case was properly dismissed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*

*34*R. Lee Moore, Brannen, Booth & Cowart,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Anderson & Jones,*contra.
Exhibit 10.2


                             AssureTec Systems, Inc.





December 5, 2003

Perimeter Realty
c/o Nelson & Small
212 Canco Road
Portland, ME 04103

Gentlemen,

Please be advised that AssureTec Systems desires to exercise its option to
extend the current lease at 200 Perimeter Road for an additional three years as
provided at Section 1.01 of the referenced lease.

Sincerely,

/s/
R. Bruce Reeves, Chairman
AssureTec Systems, Inc.














                             AssureTec Systems, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  200 PERIMETER ROAD, MANCHESTER, NH 03103-3326
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: KEVIN BOYER,

 Relator.

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-14-00182-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The court has considered this cause on the Relator=s petition for writ of mandamus 

against the Honorable Richard Roman, formerly sitting as Judge of the 346th District Court of 

El Paso, Texas, and concludes that Relator=s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. 

We therefore deny the petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this 

court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2014.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice 

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James W. Bernau, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Willamette Valley
Vineyards Inc.

Date: May 15, 2006
By:	 /s/ James W. Bernau
Name: James W. Bernau
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
May 29, 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DRAKE INTERIORS, L.L .C. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00349

- CV V.

ANDREA MARIE THOMAS AND ROBERT WARREN THOMAS , Appellee s

________________________________ This court today issued a substitute opinion. We order this court’s former judgment of April 3, 2014, vacated, set aside, and annulled. We further order this court’s opinion of April 3, 201 4, withdrawn. We deny the motions for rehearing filed by appellant, Drake Interiors, L.L.C., and by appellee, Andrea Marie Thomas.

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Andrea Marie
Thomas , signed March 20, 2013, was heard on the tr anscript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance with the court ’ s opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee, Andrea Marie Thomas.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MONARCH
CEMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,093,317
<SECURITIES>                                20,930,123
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,419,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                   447,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,306,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,966,370
<PP&E>                                     100,074,193
<DEPRECIATION>                              74,556,421
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              76,233,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,383,095
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,539,285
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,146,139
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                76,233,032
<SALES>                                     91,819,836
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            91,819,836
<CGS>                                       70,781,950
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               70,781,950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,903,465
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,800,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,103,465
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,103,465
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.40
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         363,061
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  772,417
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,454,376
<PP&E>                                       4,863,417
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,860,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,198,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,423,641
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       241,945
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,518,694
<OTHER-SE>                                  (4,978,626)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,198,209
<SALES>                                      3,011,894
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,011,894
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,187,254
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,018,434
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             194,006
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                622,488
<INCOME-TAX>                                   211,624
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            410,864
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   410,864
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              WASHINGTON D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 10-K/A

                   QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF
                    THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                        For Quarter Ended December 31, 1996

                         Commission File Number 0-2734

                          American Midland Corporation

New York                                                  13-1919009
(State or other jurisdiction of                           I.R.S. employer
incorporated or organization)                             identification
                                                          number

                   302 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10001
                 (Exact address of principal executive offices)


                                 (212) 279-5612
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by (X) whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports  required to be
filed by section 13 or 15 (d) of the  Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during
the  preceding 12 months,  and (2) has been subject to such filing  requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes X No

Common stock, $.01 par value: 5,696,000 shares
outstanding as of March 31,1997












<PAGE>
                                        SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the  requirements  of the  Securities  and Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned who are duly authorized to do so.

Dated May 5, 1997                   AMERICAN MIDLAND CORP.
                                    ----------------------




                                            BY: /s/ Irwin S. Lampert
                                            IRWIN S. LAMPERT
                                            SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
                                            AND TREASURER
                                            (PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
                                            OFFICER)
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4653

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the medical 

expenses of a child with special needs shall be allowable as a medical 

expense deduction without regard to the 7.5 percent adjusted gross 

income threshold. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2004

Mr. TANCREDO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that the medical expenses of a child with special needs 

shall be allowable as a medical expense deduction without 

regard to the 7.5 percent adjusted gross income threshold.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Compassionate Assist5 ance for Parents with Children with Special Needs Act 

6 of 2004’’. 
2

•HR 4653 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME THRESHOLD IN MED2 ICAL EXPENSE DEDUCTION NOT TO APPLY 

3 TO MEDICAL EXPENSES FOR CHILDREN WITH 

4 SPECIAL NEEDS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 213 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 (relating to medical, dental, etc., ex7 penses) is amended by adding at the end the following new 

8 subsection: 

9 ‘‘(f) ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME THRESHOLD NOT TO

10 APPLY TO EXPENSES FOR CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL

11 NEEDS.—

12 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The adjusted gross income 

13 threshold in subsection (a) shall not apply to ex14 penses for the medical care of a child with special 

15 needs. 

16 ‘‘(2) CHILD WITH SPECIAL NEEDS.—For pur17 poses of paragraph (1), the term ‘child with special 

18 needs’ means any dependent of the taxpayer—

19 ‘‘(A) who has not attained the age of 18 

20 as of the close of the calendar year in which the 

21 taxable year of the taxpayer begins, and 

22 ‘‘(B) who is considered to be disabled 

23 under section 1614(a)(3) of the Social Security 

24 Act.’’
3

•HR 4653 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23a

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated February 8, 2002,  accompanying the consolidated
financial  statements  and  schedules  included  in the Annual  Report of United
Capital  Corp.  and  Subsidiaries  on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31,
2001. We hereby consent to the  incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration  Statements of United Capital Corp. on Forms S-8 (Registration Nos.
33-28045, 33-65140,  333-28395 and 333-57873),  pertaining to the 1988 Incentive
and  Non-Qualified  Stock Option Plan,  amended and the 1988 Joint Incentive and
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended.

\s\ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Melville, New York
March 8, 2002
```