alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
November 23, 2005










 



 



 



 



 



 



November 23, 2005






 



 



Stephen F. Fisher



Entercom Communications



401 City Avenue, Suite 809



Bala Cynwyd, PA  19004



Fax:  610-660-5661






Dear Steve:






I am very pleased to offer you the opportunity to serve as a member of the Knoll, Inc. ("Knoll") board of directors (the "Board") as of the date of formal approval of Knoll's board of directors, anticipated to be on December 6, 2005.  We would also like you to be a member of the Company's audit committee.  We are convinced that you will be a terrific addition to our Board.






As we discussed, the compensation would be as follows:



1.$25,000 per year as a director fee.






2.  An additional $2,500 per board meeting (including telephonic Board meetings).






3.  Payment of reasonable expenses for attending Board and Board Committee meetings.






4.  A grant to you of 25,000 options to purchase Knoll stock with an exercise price equal to the closing price on the day of your appointment.  These stock options would vest 25% per year on each of the next 4 anniversaries of the grant date and would otherwise be controlled by the terms of the applicable Knoll Stock Incentive Plan and a Stock Option Agreement.















There would be no additional compensation for committee meetings (whether in person or by telephone), except for reimbursement of expenses.






 



 



This offer is subject to:



1.The Board's formal election of you as a director and approval of your equity grant;






2.The Compensation Committee's formal approval of your compensation; and






3. Your execution of the Knoll Intellectual Property Agreement and Code of Ethics.















Please indicate your acceptance of this offer by signing and returning this letter.  By signing this letter, you also keep non-public information that you learn about Knoll confidential.  I will then have our lawyers send out the Knoll Code of Ethics and Intellectual Property Agreement to move this process along.  We look forward to the skill, intelligence and experience that you will bring to Knoll.






Thank you.






Sincerely,






 



/s/ Burton B. Staniar



Burton B. Staniar



Chairman






cc:Andrew Cogan



Jeffrey Harris






 



 



 



Agreed






 



/s/ Stephen F. Fisher



  Stephen F. Fisher
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                         164,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,398,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                    153,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,804,000
<PP&E>                                      10,212,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,475,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,022,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,838,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       137,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,875,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,022,000
<SALES>                                      8,261,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,261,000
<CGS>                                        5,719,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,886,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (19,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             177,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                498,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            484,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   484,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
     I, Arthur S. Rosten, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AMDL, Inc.
     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis annual report;
     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the small business issuer and have:
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annualreport based on such evaluation; and
     c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s fourth fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: May 12, 2005      /s/ Arthur S. Rosten   Arthur S. Rosten   Chief Executive Officer  
21
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 8, 2010
    /s/ Douglas MacLellanDouglas MacLellanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Radient Pharmaceuticals Corporation
#### Paul Ker, Appellant, *v.*A. S. Stern, Doing Business, etc., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

April, 1919.)

Jurisdiction — limitation of — damages — Municipal Court of city of New York.

Where in a Municipal Court action for damages for breach of a contract of employment the complaint, reasonably construed, seeks to recover only up to the jurisdictional amount for which judgment can be rendered, the mere fact that no definite sum is claimed does not deprive the court of jurisdiction.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, ninth district, dismissing the complaint at the close of the plaintiff’s case, after a trial by a judge without a jury.

*5Otterbourg, Steindler & Houston (Charles A. Houston, of counsel), for appellant.

Dittenhoefer & Fishel, for respondent.

Bijur, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for breach of a contract of employment under which the defendant employed the plaintiff, an actor, at a salary of seventy-five dollars a week.

The terms other than the duration- of the contract were contained in a letter written by defendant to plaintiff dated July 12, T918. Plaintiff properly proved by paroi testimony, admitted without objection, that the contract was to continue for a period of thirty-seven weeks.

Plaintiff, in his complaint, had pleaded that the contract of employment was made *“*on or about July 12th, 1918.” The learned trial judge dismissed the complaint apparently upon the theory that this allegation restricted plaintiff to the letter of July twelfth, in which no definite term was stated, and which, *n*therefore, constituted merely a contract at will.

' Defendant upon this appeal scarcely attempts to justify the dismissal upon this ground, but urges that upon the allegations of the complaint the Municipal Court had no jurisdiction over the action. This contention is based upon the demand for judgment *“*at the rate of $75 a week with interest from the 19th of August, 1918, to the date of the trial of this action.” The argument advanced is that the complaint does not show that the amount demanded was less than $1,000, but that on the contrary since the contract was for thirty-seven weeks at $75 a week, presumably the amount of damages sought exceeds $1,000. In my opinion neither of these contentions is sound. The complaint, reasonably construed, seeks to recover *6damages for breach of contract up to the jurisdictional amount for which the court can render judgment, and the mere fact that no definite sum is stated does not deprive the Municipal Court of jurisdiction. See Mun. Ct. Code, § 180.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

Guy and Pendleton, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, with thirty dollars to appellant to abide event.
# C o urt o f A ppe a ls

o f th e S ta te o f G e o rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

The C o u rt o f Appea ls h ereb

y p a s s es the fo llo wi

n g order:

A 25A 026 5. RA I SSA K EN GN E v

. TH E STA TE.

Raissa K engne is f

ac ing c riminal p ro s ec u t i o n and has f iled nu mero u s p ro se

mo tio ns in the trial c ou r t. On J u ly 22, 202 4, w e d ismissed K engne’ s a p p lic atio n f o r

d isc r etio nary ap peal f

ro m a J u ne 1 7

, 2024 trial c o u rt o rd er f ind ing t hat K engne w as

no t au tho riz ed t o f

ile p ro s e mo tio ns, a s s he w as rep resented b y c o unsel b elo w

. S e e

Case N o. A 24D 0 41 1

. I n o u r ord er, w e also co nc lu ded that K engne is no t au tho riz ed

to rep resent herself bef

o re this Co u rt. I n t he instant ac tio n, K eng n e filed a p ro se

no tic e o f ap p e al f r o m the same trial c o u rt o rd er.

O u r d ismissal o f K engne’ s ap plic atio n in Case N o

. A 24D 041 1 rend ers th e

c u r rent ap p eal barred by the law o f the c ase. See Ro s s v. S t a te , 31 0 G a. A p p

. 326

, 327

(7 1 3 SE2d 438) (201 1 ) (“ [A ]ny issu e that was r aised and reso lv ed in an earlier ap p eal

is the law o f the c ase and is bind ing o n this Co u rt

. . . . ”) (c ita t i o n a nd p u nc tu atio n

o mitted ) ; ac c o r d Ho o k v

. Bergen

, 286 Ga. Ap p

. 258, 26 1 (1 ) (6 49 SE2d 31 3) (2007 ) (a

ru ling on an ap p lic atio n f o r d isc retio nary ap p eal ac ts as res j u d ic a t a i n later

p ro c eed ings); see also Ja cks o n v

. S ta te , 27 3 Ga. 320, 320 (54 0 S E 2 d 6 1 2 ) (2001 ) (a

p arty “ is no t entitled to ano ther bite at the ap p le by w ay o f a sec o nd ap p eal” ).

Fo r the abo v e reaso ns, this ap peal is hereby D I SM I S S E D f or lac k o f

j u risd ic tio n. A d d itio nally, w e cau ti o n K en g n e that in ac c o rd anc e with o u r o rd er in

Case N o

. A 24D 041 1

, she is no t au tho riz ed to rep r esent herself bef o re this Co u rt September 10, 2024w hile simu ltaneo u sly being rep resented by c o u nsel.

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O ffic e , A t la n t a ,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t ify t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e

x t r a c t fr o m

t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

.

W it n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t

h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

. 09/10/2024
NICE Community Coordinating Council

Meeting Agenda

April 27, 2022 | 3:30-5:00 p.m. ET

BlueJeans: https://primetime.bluejeans.com/a2m/live-event/dpqyhydw

Dial In: +1 (800) 520- 9950 | PIN 1675270 #

I. Introduction and Ground Rules –NICE Program Manager Susana Barraza

II. Opening Remarks

a. Academic Co-Chair – Marni Baker-Stein, Chief Academic Officer and Provost, Western 

Governors University 

b. Government Co-Chair - Rodney Petersen, Director of NICE 

III. Standing Items

a. Report Roundup – Learning from Good Ideas 

Military Family Lifestyle Survey- Spouse Employment Findings

Presented by Karly Howell, Blue Start Families

URL: https://bluestarfam.org/research/mfls-survey-results-2021/

b. Strategy Story – New Developments that align to NICE Strategic Plan 

The Robotics/Automation and Cybersecurity Knowledge Sharing Coordination Network

Presented by Zackary Hubbard, NC State University

URL: https://ncmep.org/tracks-cn/

c. Framework Feature – Applications and Uses of Workforce Framework for Cybersecurity 

Boeing Technical Apprenticeship Program

Presented by Chris Schuller, Leader, Technical Skills Accelerators, Boeing

URL: https://www.iam-boeing-apprenticeship.com/

d. Research Review-Driving Research on Effective Practices 

State of Cybersecurity

Presented by Jonathan Brandt, Director, Professional Practices and Innovation, ISACA

URL: http://www.isaca.org/state-of-cybersecurity-2022

e. Featured Topic 

Retention and Mobility of Cybersecurity Workforce

Presented by Rodney Petersen and Marian Merritt, National Initiative for Cybersecurity 

Education

IV. Working Group Updates

a. Promote Career Discovery

Co-chairs: Keith Davis, Koinonia Family Life, Inc

b. Transform Learning Process

Co-chairs: Richard Spires, Learning Tree; Dr. Donna Schaeffer, Marymount University
c. Modernize Talent Management

Co-chair: Kevin Perry, United States Army; Dr. Melissa Woo, Michigan State University

V. Community of Interest Updates

a. Apprenticeships in Cybersecurity

Co-chairs: Tony Bryan, CyberUp; Debbie McLeod, McLeod Information Systems

b. Cybersecurity Skills Competitions

Co-chairs: Amelia Phillips, Highline College

c. K12 Cybersecurity Education

Co-chair: Laurin Buchanan, Secure Decisions

d. NICE Framework Users

Karen Wetzel, Manager of the NICE Framework

VI. Project Progress Reports

a. NICE Conference and Expo (Atlanta, Georgia) – June 6-8, 2022 

Presented by Paola Hechavarria, Florida International University

URL: https://niceconference.org/

b. NICE K12 Cybersecurity Education Conference (Virtual) – December 5-6, 2022

Presented by Amber Lindsay, President and CEO, iKeepSafe

URL: https://www.k12cybersecurityconference.org/

c. US Cyber Games

Presented by Brad Wolfenden, Director, Cyber Sports, Katzcy

URL: https://www.uscybergames.com/

VII. Closing Remarks and Next Meeting Reminder

The next NICE Council Meeting will be May 25, 2022 at 3:30 p.m. ET.
Multitiered Video Analytics for Abnormality Detection and Alerting to Improve

Response Time for First Responder Communications and Operations

Shishir K. Shah?, Julie Stroup??, Hinrich Schmidt

??

and Pranav Mantini

?

?Department of Computer Science - University of Houston, ??City of Houston Public Safety Video Initiative

Project Objective

Develop a framework and video analytic algorithms

for online learning of video characteristics and use

them for abnormality alerting.

Evaluate the impact of developed video analytics

and alerting for public safety, specifically in

reducing response time related to video surveillance.

Use case: Dispatchers continuously review thousands of

cameras for abnormalities such as non-functional cameras,

unusual events, and suspicious behavior to communicate

relevant information to first responders.

Need

Ability to perform proactive surveillance to quickly

respond to incidents.

Tools for automatic camera operational

management and alerting.

Proposed Work

Analyze video and generate automatic real time

alerts.

Maintenance alerts

Abnormal events

Abnormal behavior

Enable quick relay of information to first responders

through dispatchers.

Low level alert Mid level alert High level alert

Blocked Left baggage Drunk person

Defocussed Perimeter crossing Suspicions groups

Moved Opposite lane driving

Unusual motion

Partnership with City of Houston

City of Houston began developing a Public Safety

Video System (PSVS) to improve situational

awareness of public venues, critical assets, and

public safety areas of interest.

To date, the City has implemented 850+ cameras

in the region as well as gaining access to over 400

more through partnerships with other stakeholders.

It is used by qualified Public Safety personnel for

forensic purposes and live viewing on a routine

basis.

COH Public Safety Video Initiative

Project KPIs and Goals

Algorithm Development and Evaluation

Simulated and real-world data to train, test, and

evaluate algorithms for different levels of alerting.

Understanding the accuracy of developed

algorithms and computational performance of the

overall system.

Deployment and System Evaluation

Deploy the analytics for continuous monitoring of

cameras within the City of Houston PSVS.

Benchmarking and performance characterization.

Usability analysis.

Impact on Public Safety

Enhanced analytics development.

Understanding of novel use cases for analytics.

Best practices for applying analytics to video

surveillance systems.

PSIM integration requirements understanding.

http://www.qil.uh.edu/ (shah@cs.uh.edu
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          22,345
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  224,218
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,408)
<INVENTORY>                                    175,787
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               441,951
<PP&E>                                         313,494
<DEPRECIATION>                               (161,144)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,271,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          175,370
<BONDS>                                      1,002,428
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           28,839
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   (220,770)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,271,807
<SALES>                                        858,532
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               858,532
<CGS>                                          553,463
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  553,463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               158,928
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              94,933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,066
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,379)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,379)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>