alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,080,161
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,506,363
<ALLOWANCES>                                    76,000
<INVENTORY>                                 38,565,055
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,075,579
<PP&E>                                       6,639,329
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,542,271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,595,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,227,550
<BONDS>                                      2,526,374
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,673
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,308,956
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,595,517
<SALES>                                     49,475,311
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            49,475,311
<CGS>                                       41,845,049
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               41,845,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,552,933
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             272,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,804,506
<INCOME-TAX>                                   597,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,206,906
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,206,906
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .049
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .049
        

</TABLE>
#### Thomas Levell et al. *v.*W. H. Elliott.

Exemption — Sale of Exempt Property.

Where a creditor sells property of the debtor which is exempt from sale, the creditor may be required to account for the value of the property thus sold.

APPEAL FROM ESTILL CIRCUIT COURT.

Dec. —, 1873.

*Lilly, for appellants.*

*Riddell '& Cardwell, for appellee.*

The two horses of appellee were exempt from! sale for the satisfaction of the rent. The statute is positive and leaves no room for construction.

It was left with the jury to say whether the defendant in the execution had more horses than those exempt from the payment of his debts, and the verdict was that he had not.

We see no great hardship in making the appellants account for the value of the horses sold. They were exempt from, sale, and the owner, having elected to sue for their value, the creditor has the purchaser’s bond with which to satisfy, at least, a part of the judgment against him.

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4570 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4570

To amend provisions of law originally enacted in the Clinger-Cohen Act 
       to enhance agency planning for information security needs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2004

 Mr. Putnam (for himself and Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend provisions of law originally enacted in the Clinger-Cohen Act 
       to enhance agency planning for information security needs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO CLINGER-COHEN PROVISIONS TO ENHANCE AGENCY 
              PLANNING FOR INFORMATION SECURITY NEEDS.

    Chapter 113 of title 40, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in section 11302(b), by inserting ``security,'' after 
        ``use,'';
            (2) in section 11302(c), by inserting ``, including 
        information security risks,'' after ``risks'' both places it 
        appears;
            (3) in section 11312(b)(1), by striking ``information 
        technology investments'' and inserting ``investments in 
        information technology (including information security 
        needs)''; and
            (4) in section 11315(b)(2), by inserting ``, secure,'' 
        after ``sound''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted 
from the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year 
ended December 31, 1995 of Mosinee Paper Corporation and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial 
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           2,416
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,346
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,813)
<INVENTORY>                                     33,641
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,753
<PP&E>                                         354,120
<DEPRECIATION>                               (157,555)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 272,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,103
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        58,678
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,514
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   272,945
<SALES>                                        305,570
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               305,570
<CGS>                                          249,077
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,787
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,470)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,066
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,110
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,925
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,185
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,185
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.31


 


AMENDMENT TO


TYCO INTERNATIONAL LTD. 2004 STOCK AND INCENTIVE PLAN


(EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2004)


 


1.             Section 5.1 of the Tyco International Ltd. 2004 Stock
and Incentive Plan (Effective as of January 1, 2004) is amended and restated,
effective September 22, 2005, to read as follows:


 


“5.1         Shares Available.  The Shares available under the Plan will be
authorized but unissued Shares and, to the extent permissible under applicable
law, Shares acquired by the Company, any Subsidiary or any other person or
entity designated by the Company.”
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2008
KATHERINE L. RUSSELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VBR, a joint venture of Vinnell C orporation and Brown & Root Services Corporation, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-96-1431-A) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 23, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Katherine L. Russell, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Bennett Mishkin, J. Keith Burt, Lisa Anne Lavelle, MCKENNA & CUNEO, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment on her complaint alleging age discrimination, defamation, and retaliation. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Russell v. VBR , No. CA-96-1431-A (E.D. Va. June 30, 1997).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by 
reference in this registration statement of our reports dated January 29, 1998 
and August 22, 1997 included in Protection One, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the year 
ended December 31, 1997 and to all references to our Firm included in this 
registration statement.



                                             /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Dallas, Texas
December 9, 1998
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40422

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

MARIE ANN WATKINS,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 520

Filed: June 4, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin 

Fall County. Hon. G. Richard Bevan, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of fourteen years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of one and one-half years, for grand theft, affirmed.

Fuller Law Offices; Daniel S. Brown, Twin Falls, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Marie Ann Watkins pled guilty to grand theft. Idaho Code §§ 18-2403(1), 18-

2407(1)(b)(1). The district court sentenced Watkins to a unified term of fourteen years, with a 

minimum period of confinement of one and one-half years. Watkins appeals asserting that the 

district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 
2

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Watkins’ judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Diane:

Thanks	for	your	interest	in	our	perspectives	on	M-TACs. We	enclose	our	comments	to	one	of	your	

items.	 The	comment	also	hints	to	at	least	one	of	your	other	themes.

(1) Technology transition and commercialization tools and services that 

should be provided by M-TACs.

M-TACs have the potential to bridge the gap between academic and 

industrial research, and use the deployment of such research to 

stimulate innovation and growth in manufacturing. For one, they must 

have the human cadres to survey, assess and position technologies 

coming out of the research labs. Key requirements are in-depth 

knowledge of the science and technology behind such research and the 

state of development of what is coming out of those fields. Likewise a 

sense of the potential for commercialization and instructive 

communication must be part of the skill set of these centers in order to 

qualify the likelihood of market potential and success. Any software 

tools that can assist in developing and evaluating business cases and 

simulating the scientific principles and advantages behind them, are 

definitely relevant.

MEP’s direct contact with manufacturing and its immediate concerns 

and actionable strategic plans provides practitioner perspective and 

focus to the two way communication exchange that must take place 

between these two entities (M-TACs and MEPs). Any new technology 

will face an adoption and learning curve through its ramp up to full 

utilization. Additionally it will likely face cost differences with standard 

manufacturing methods which may have reached their lowest levels 

and consequently slow its adoption rates. But opportunities exist 

where new manufacturing methods can reduce development time, 

yield higher quality, consume fewer amounts of expensive materials, 

energy, pollutants, and increase availability to feed the supply chain: 

MEPs are directly cognizant of these.

Regards,

Carlos	Vidal	Arbona

PRiMEX

http://www.primexpr.org/

“Active	in	the	Economic	Development	Ecosystem	since	1986”
exv4w2



 






Exhibit 4.2









 









 








     If the Corporation is authorized to issue more than one class of stock, the Corporation will furnish without charge to each
stockholder who so requests a statement of the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special
rights of each class of stock thereof of the Corporation, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or
rights. Such request may be made to the Corporation.



     The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were
written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:






			
	TEN COM	 	 — as tenants in common
			
	TEN ENT	 	 — as tenants by the entireties
			
	JT TEN	 	 — as joint tenants with right

     of survivorship and not as

     tenants in common











	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT -

	 	  

	 	Custodian
	 	  

	 	 
	 

	 	(Cust)
	 	 
	 	(Minor)	 	 
	 
	 	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors
	 
	 	 	Act	  
	 	 
	 	 	 	 	(State)	 	 











Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.




For Value Received, ________________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto




	 	 	 
	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
	 	 
	 
	 
 	 	 
	 





 
 

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE




 





 





 

Shares of the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint




 

Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Company with full power of substitution in the premises.




	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Dated 	 	 	 
 	 
	 	 		NOTICE: 	THE
SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
	 
	Signature(s) Guaranteed:
 
 





 




			
	THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS,

STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN

APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 18

- 00310

- CV

IN RE AMOS JACKSON, SR.

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator petitioned for a writ of mandamus from this Court ordering the trial court

to set a pre

- trial hearing in the underlying case and issue a bench warrant for relator’s

presence at the hearing. We requested a response from the respondent and the real party

in interest. The respondent informed the Court that a pre

- trial hearing has been set for

November 14, 2018 and a bench warrant has been issued. Documentary evidence was

attached to the response in support of the respondent’s assertions.

Accordingly, because relator’s complaints have been addressed, relator’s Petition

for Writ of Mandamus, filed on October 9, 201 8, is dismissed as moot.

TOM GRAY

Chief JusticeIn re Jackson Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed November 7 , 2018

[OT06]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                   5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                              8,440
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      59,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                                        45,726
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  117,516
<PP&E>                                                            231,193
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    112,581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    250,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             347,940
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                           14,046
<OTHER-SE>                                                       (368,889)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      250,742
<SALES>                                                           205,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  205,096
<CGS>                                                              50,140
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      50,140
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  600,694
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (445,738)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (445,738)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                          (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           0



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

***URANIUM RESOURCES, INC.***

650 S. EdmondsLane, Suite 108, Lewisville, TX 75067

972.219.3330 Phone   972.219.3311 Fax

August9, 2007

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 5th Street, N.W.

Washington,D.C. 20549

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

I,Thomas H. Ehrlich, Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer ofUranium Resources, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2007which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| */s/* Thomas H. Ehrlich                     | * * | * * |
|---------------------------------------------|----------|----------|
| Thomas H. Ehrlich                           |
| Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
| August 9, 2007                              |

 

----
POWER OF ATTORNEY   We, the undersigned directors of Questar Gas Company, hereby severally constitute Ronald W. Jibson and S. E. Parks, and each of them acting alone, our true and lawful attorneys, with full power to them and each of them to sign for us, and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2008 and any and all amendments to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Questar Gas Company, hereby ratifying and confirming our signa­tures as they may be signed by the attorneys appointed herein to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2008 and any and all amendments to such Report.  Witness our hands on the respective dates set forth below.  Signature Title Date   /s/ Chairman of the Board 02/10/09 Keith O. Rattie   /s/ President and 02/10/09 Ronald W. Jibson Chief Executive Officer   /s/ Director 02/10/09 Teresa Beck   /s/ Director 02/10/09 Robert E. McKee III   /s/ Director 02/10/09 Gary G. Michael   /s/ Director 02/10/09 Harris H. Simmons   /s/ Director 02/10/09 Bruce A. Williamson
ex4-4 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing










1


























































	
12/12/2005 13 :30 FAX 5123142322




	
Idj003/00 3