alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4450 

To authorize the Government of Ukraine to establish a memorial on Federal 

land in the District of Columbia to honor the victims of the Ukrainian 

famine-genocide of 1932–1933. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2004 

Mr. LEVIN (for himself, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. 

KNOLLENBERG, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. OLVER, Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. HINCHEY, and 

Mr. QUINN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Government of Ukraine to establish a memorial on Federal land in the District of Columbia to 

honor the victims of the Ukrainian famine-genocide of 

1932–1933. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds the following: 

5 (1) Internationally accepted principles of 

6 human rights condemn the use of food as a political 

7 weapon. 
2 

•HR 4450 IH 

1 (2) In the years 1932–1933, Ukraine was rav2 aged and its people brought to the verge of physical 

3 extinction by a famine caused not by natural causes 

4 such as pestilence, drought, floods, or poor harvest, 

5 but as a consequence of a premeditated policy on the 

6 part of the Soviet Government led by Joseph Stalin 

7 to crush the nationally conscious Ukrainian people 

8 and destroy their national, political, cultural, and re9 ligious rights. 

10 (3) Attempts at intercessions were made by the 

11 United States Government during the height of the 

12 famine, in the fall/winter of 1932–1933, indicating 

13 that it has always been the traditional policy of the 

14 United States to recognize events such as the fam15 ine-genocide in Ukraine. 

16 (4) The United States Commission on the 

17 Ukraine Famine found in its report filed in 1988 

18 pursuant to Public Law 98–473 that the Ukrainian 

19 famine was a deliberate policy of the Soviet Govern20 ment. 

21 (5) The Ukrainian famine is considered an un22 precedented heinous crime of genocide as defined by 

23 the United Nations Genocide Convention. 

24 (6) Ukrainian communities worldwide plan to 

25 commemorate the 75th anniversary of the Ukrainian 
3 

•HR 4450 IH 

1 famine-genocide with appropriate observances to pay 

2 tribute to the victims of this tragedy. 

3 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Government of Ukraine is 

5 authorized to establish a memorial on Federal land in the 

6 District of Columbia to honor the victims of the Ukrainian 

7 famine-genocide of 1932–1933. 

8 (b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMO9 RATIVE WORKS.—The establishment of the memorial shall 

10 be in accordance with the Commemorative Works Act (40 

11 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.), except that sections 2(c), 6(b), 8(b), 

12 and 10(c) of that Act shall not apply with respect to the 

13 memorial. 

14 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON PAYMENT OF EXPENSES. 

15 The United States Government shall not pay any ex16 pense for the establishment of the memorial or its mainte17 nance. 

Æ
#### Hiram J. Jordan *v.*Thos. Wallace’s Adm’r.

Appeal — Review—Findings of Court.

Where, by consent of tbe parties, tbe law and tbe facts are submitted to tbe judge, bis findings on tbe facts will be treated as tbe verdict of tbe jury.

APPEAL FROM LAWRENCE CIRCUIT COURT.

January 31, 1874.

*481-, *for appellant.*

-, *for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The law and facts of this case were by consent submitted to- the judge. His finding on the facts must therefore be treated as the verdict of a jury.

The date of the $12.59 note is inconsistent with the appellant’s theory that Wallace collected sixty dollars on the $98.00 note early in the war. The only witness who attempted to explain this inconsistency is Allison. His character is assailed, and the circuit judge seems to have disregarded his testimony, and we cannot say he erred in doing so.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MOBILE AMERICA CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        29,303,564
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       43,620,417
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         43,511,416
<EQUITIES>                                   1,373,070
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              91,238,013
<CASH>                                       4,518,020
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             100,486
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      (2,047,989)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             138,242,138
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             33,643,295
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         32,893,437
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             12,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       191,110
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,494,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               138,242,138
<PREMIUMS>                                  44,171,359
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          5,390,681
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             263,711
<OTHER-INCOME>                               8,984,456
<BENEFITS>                                  32,876,176
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  2,295,965
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        14,770,170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,867,896
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,692,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,175,796
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,175,796
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .86
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              20,040,739
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         35,706,903
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                           (2,736,845)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                          23,961,413
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            13,143,680
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             15,905,704
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                      2,736,845


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                               TELVUE CORPORATION

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. sec. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TelVue Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jesse Lerman, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: 08/16/10                          /s/ Jesse Lerman
                                        ----------------
                                        Jesse Lerman
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2967

_____________________________ S ALINA T UCKER

, Appellant,
v. S TATE OF F LORIDA, Appellee.

___________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Robert Wheeler, Judge. January 26, 2018 P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . J AY, W INSOR

, and M.K. T HOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4836

AN ACT

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical Center’’. E. Creek Department of Veterans Affairs Med- ical center in Amarillo, Texas, as the ‘‘Thomas

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4836

AN ACT

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center

in Amarillo, Texas, as the ‘‘Thomas E. Creek Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4836 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Department of Veterans Affairs medical center

3 in Amarillo, Texas, shall after the date of the enactment

4 of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Thomas E.

5 Creek Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document,

8 record, or other paper of the United States to the medical

9 center referred to in section 1 shall be considered to be

10 a reference to the ‘‘Thomas E. Creek Department of Vet11 erans Affairs Medical Center’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 13,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Frank Ford *v.*W. H. Sandford, etc.

Vendor and Purchaser — Sale in Gross.

Wihere the bond for title shows that the transaction was a sale and purchase in gross, and the deficit is less -than five per cent, a court of equity will not interfere- on the ground of fraud or mistake as to the quantity of land.

APPEAL FROM OWEN CIRCUIT COURT.

June 18, 1873.

*Craddock & Roberts, for appellmt.*

*Lindsey, Drone, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

Appellee alleges in liis petition that the contract for the sale of the land had been so far executed that the entire purchase money-had been paid, and possession received, it remaining only for the appellant to execute and deliver the deed of conveyance stipulated for by his bond for title. He sues to- recover back a portion of the purchase price thus alleged to have been paid, upon the ground that there was a deficit in the quantity, or estimated quantity, of land; this deficit, according to the survey made by order of court, and upon appellant’s motion, is less than, five per cent, of the quantity it is alleged the parties at the time of the sale estimated the tract to contain. The bond for title, exhibited by appellee, shows that the land was sold and purchased by the tract. It was essentially a sale in gross. If the supposed quantity was referred to in the negotiations at all, there is nothing in the written contract nor in the proof from which it can be inferred that the parties did not intend to risk the usual rates of -excess or deficit, such rates as might be reasonably calculated on as within the range of ordinary contingency. The deficit in this case is not extraordinary, nor unreasonable. It does not, in our opinion, present a case authorizing a court of equity to- interfere to relieve appellee upon the idea either of fraud or of such a mistake as to- render it unconscientious for appellant to insist that the contract shall be executed just as the parties made it.

The judgment in favor of Sandford is reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to settle the accounts of the parties without regard to the deficit in the quantity of the land. On the appeal against Berryman the judgment is *affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Anthony E. Applebaum, Chief Executive Officer of Mera Pharmaceuticals, certify that (1) Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 3 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



Date:   June 12, 2007



/s/ANTHONY E. APPLEBAUM

----------------------------------------

Anthony E. Applebaum

Principal Financial and Accounting Officer







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### James O. Rundell v. Henry L. Blakeslee, highway com’r and Chester W. Hopkins, township clerk.

*Jwy's finding in proceedings to lay out a prrimate way.*

In. proceedings to lay out a private way the jury must find that there is a necessity for it; it is not enough to certify that they “adjudge and determine that a private highway be established.”

Certiorari.

Submitted Jan. 17.

Decided Jan. 25.

*Jerome W. Turner*for plaintiff in certiorari.

*Hcmchett c& Stcurh*for defendants in certiorari.

*576Marston, J.

This case comes before us on a writ of *certiorari*to review proceedings in laying out a private way. The jury certified that after viewing the premises and hearing the arguments of the parties interested, “We do adjudge, and deterinine that a private highway be established,” commencing, etc., and they assess the damages. There is no. finding of necessity, nor the equivalent thereof. Jurors, may be willing to establish a highway or private way and yet not be willing to find that any necessity therefor exists. Such a finding is however essential. *Ayres v. Richards*38 Mich. 216.

The proceedings must be quashed.

The other Justices concurred.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magnitude  Information Systems,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the
"Form 10-QSB"),  I, Steven D. Rudnik,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify, as of the date hereof,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my  knowledge,   that  the  Company's   Form  10-QSB  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information  contained in the Form 10-QSB,  fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  May 12, 2005                  /s/  Steven D. Rudnik
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Steven D. Rudnik
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer



<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                               TELVUE CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. sec. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of TelVue Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Murphy,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date:    11/14/2008                    /s/ Joseph M. Murphy
                                       --------------------
                                       Joseph M. Murphy
                                       President (Chief Executive Officer)
EX-10.2






Exhibit 10.2




NOTICE OF GRANT OF NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION




TO:



We are pleased to notify you that, by action of the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors on 11-18-05, you have been granted a non-qualified stock option to purchase Jo-Ann
Stores, Inc. Common Shares at an option price of $12.42 per share. The stock option is subject to
the terms of the Company’s 1998 Incentive Compensation Plan and the Committee Rules implementing
the Plan.



At this time, we wish to call your attention to several of the important aspects of the stock
option granted to you. This summary is not intended to be a complete explanation of your rights or
the grants and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Plan and the Committee Rules.



This stock option shall be exercisable as to one-half of the shares on March 1, 2009 and
one-half of the shares on March 1, 2010. Please refer to Section II(6) of the Committee Rules for
a description of the limited circumstances in which your stock option may be exercised after you
terminate employment.



You will not realize any income from the grant of this stock option; however, upon payment of
the option price in cash, the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise
will be taxed as compensation to you. Payment of the option price with Common Shares will also
result in income taxable to you in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value
of the additional shares received and the cash, if any, paid as part of the option price.



If a one-half installment of the number of shares subject to the option would otherwise
include a fraction of a share, that installment (unless it is the last installment) shall be
rounded up to the next larger number of full shares.



You are not permitted to sell or assign this stock option to anyone other than your spouse,
your children, other lineal descendants, or a trust for their benefit. The option will terminate,
and your right to purchase shares of Common Stock shall expire on 11-18-2012.



This stock option may only be exercised by delivery to the Supervisor, Financial Services of
the Company a signed copy of the Election to Exercise Stock Option form attached to this Notice.
Please note that full payment of the option price must accompany the Election to Exercise Stock
Option.



As stated above, this grant of a stock option is further subject to all the terms and
conditions of the Plan and the Committee Rules.



JO-ANN STORES, INC.



By:



DATE OF


NOTICE: 11-18-2005



The undersigned hereby accepts the stock option referenced to above in accordance with the
terms of this Notice.



Date:  , 2005 By:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 72200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28600]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[DR.5B711.IA000815]


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact taking effect.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes the Class III Amended and Restated 
Tribal-State Compact between the Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians \1\ 
and the State of California taking effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Tribe is identified as the Viejas (Baron Long) Group of 
Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians of the Viejas Reservation in 
the Department's List of Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible to 
Receive Services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, 79 
FR 4748, 4749 (January 29, 2014).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective December 5, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary--Policy and 
Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. The Amended and Restated Tribal-
State Compact (Compact) between the State of California (State) and the 
Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians (Tribe) modifies the revenue sharing 
requirements. The expiration date of the Compact was not extended and 
remains December 31, 2030. The Secretary took no action on the Compact 
within 45 days of its submission by the Tribe and the State. Therefore, 
the compact is considered to have been approved, but only to the extent 
that the Compact is consistent with IGRA. See 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(8)(C).

     Dated: December 1, 2014.
Kevin K. Washburn,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014-28600 Filed 12-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6953

HENRY PAUL RICHARDSON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Henry E. Hudson , Senior District Judge. ( 3:19

- cv - 00812

- HEH )

Submitted : December 17, 2020 Decided: December 22, 2020

Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Henry Paul Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Henry Paul Richardson, a federal prisoner, appeals the d istrict court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he sought to challenge his convictions by way of the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255

. Pursuant to § 2255(e), a prisoner may challenge his convictions in a traditional writ o f habeas corpus pursuant to § 2241 if a § 2255 motion would be inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention. Section 2255 is inadequate and ineffective to test the legality of a conviction when: (1) at the time of conviction, settled law of this circuit or the Supreme Court established the legality of the conviction; (2) subsequent to the prisoner’s direct appeal and first § 2255 motion, the substantive law changed such that the conduct of which the prisoner was convicted is deemed not to be criminal; and (3) the prisoner cannot satisfy the gatekeeping provisions of § 2255 because the new rule is not one of constitutional law. In re Jones , 226 F.3d 328, 333

- 34 (4th Cir. 2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. A ccordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. Gomez , No. 3:19

- cv - 00812

- HEH (E.D. Va. Apr. 30, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials befo re this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED