alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BOSTON FINANCIAL QUALIFIED HOUSING TAX CREDITS L.P. III
                             (A Limited Partnership)

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing
Tax Credits L.P. III (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.



                                   /s/Jenny Netzer
                                   ------------------------------------
                                   Jenny Netzer
                                   Principal Executive Officer and
                                   Principal Financial Officer
                                   Arch Street III, Inc., as
                                   Managing General Partner of
                                   Boston Financial Qualified
                                   Housing Tax Credits L.P. III

                                   Date:  November 14, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         203,467
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  786,791
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,329,926
<PP&E>                                       5,067,630
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,339,149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,429,908
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,638,519
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       245,395
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,518,694
<OTHER-SE>                                  (4,792,874)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,429,908
<SALES>                                      2,511,221
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,511,221
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,027,861
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               816,978
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             147,566
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                526,558
<INCOME-TAX>                                   179,030
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            347,528
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   347,528
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         161,118
<SECURITIES>                                11,559,998
<RECEIVABLES>                                  346,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,357
<PP&E>                                       4,176,568
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,052,887
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,215,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          430,802
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,784,413
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,215,215
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               863,663
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  319,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                544,411
<INCOME-TAX>                                   544,411
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            544,411
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   544,411
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1** 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| August 14, 2008

  | By: /s/ | David A. Wheat                                                                                         |
|-------------------------|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (Date)

           |    | David A. Wheat

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

  |
```

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23a

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated February 7, 2003, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedules included in the Annual Report of United
Capital Corp. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of United Capital Corp. on Forms S-8 (Registration Nos.
33-28045, 33-65140, 333-28395, 333-57873 and 333-98645), pertaining to the
Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended, and the 1988 Joint
Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended.

\s\ GRANT THORNTON LLP
------------------------
    GRANT THORNTON LLP

Melville, New York
March 27, 2003
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4471 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 318
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4471

                          [Report No. 108-550]

 To clarify the loan guarantee authority under title VI of the Native 
    American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 1, 2004

Mr. Renzi (for himself and Mr. Matheson) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

                             June 17, 2004

              Additional sponsors: Ms. Waters and Mr. Ney

                             June 17, 2004

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the loan guarantee authority under title VI of the Native 
    American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeownership Opportunities for 
Native Americans Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL GUARANTEES FOR FINANCING FOR TRIBAL HOUSING ACTIVITIES.

    Section 601 of the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-
Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4191) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Limitation on Percentage.--A guarantee made under this title 
shall guarantee repayment of 95 percent of the unpaid principal and 
interest due on the notes or other obligations guaranteed.''.

                                                 Union Calendar No. 318

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4471

                          [Report No. 108-550]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To clarify the loan guarantee authority under title VI of the Native 
    American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 17, 2004

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4731 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 

National Estuary Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2004 

Mr. GERLACH (for himself and Mrs. TAUSCHER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to 

reauthorize the National Estuary Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL ESTUARY 

4 PROGRAM. 

5 Section 320(i) of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

6 Act (33 U.S.C. 1330(i)) is amended by striking ‘‘2005’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘2010’’. 

Æ
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4763 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility for pension 

benefits under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

to veterans who served during certain periods of time in specified locations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 6, 2004 

Mr. RAHALL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility 

for pension benefits under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to veterans who served during 

certain periods of time in specified locations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR DEPARTMENT 

4 OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PENSION BENEFITS. 

5 Section 1501(4) of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: 

7 ‘‘Such term includes— 
2 

•HR 4763 IH 

1 ‘‘(1) the period beginning on February 1, 1955, 

2 and ending on August 4, 1964, in the case of active 

3 military, naval, or air service performed in the Re4 public of Korea; 

5 ‘‘(2) the period beginning on May 8, 1975, and 

6 ending on August 1, 1990, in the case of active mili7 tary, naval, or air service performed in the Republic 

8 of Korea; 

9 ‘‘(3) the period beginning on August 24, 1982, 

10 and ending on July 31, 1984, in the case of active 

11 military, naval, or air service performed in Lebanon 

12 or Granada; and 

13 ‘‘(4) the period beginning on December 20, 

14 1989, and ending on January 31, 1990, in the case 

15 of active military, naval, or air service performed in 

16 Panama.’’. 

Æ
#### J. M. Craig *v.*John T. Burgess et al.

Landlord and Tenant — Purchase From Tenant — Inquiry.

One who purchases property of a tenant on the leased premises is hound to make inquiry as to whether the tenant is indebted to the landlord, and as to whether the landlord has an exclusive lien on the property.

Landlord and Tenant — Attachment for Rent.

■Where property of a tenant on the leased premises has been attached, it was held that it was proper for the court to order the surrender of a horse, to he sold in case the remaining property does not sell for a sum sufficient to Satisfy the landlord’s claim for rent, and if the horse cannot be surrendered, the remedy is by suit on the attachment bond.

APPEAL FROM BOURBON CIRCUIT COURT.

December 9, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

According to Craig’s own statements he was not a *bona ñde*purchaser. He bought the horse on the leased premises, knowing that Smith was the tenant of appellees. Under such a state of case he was bound to inquire as to whether or not the tenant was indebted to his landlord, and if so, whether they had an exclusive lien upon the horse.

If the horse had remained on the premises until the attachment was taken out, there could be no doubt but that the landlord’s lien would have been superior to Craig’s claim. Act February 16, 1858. That he was not found - on the premises was the result of Craig’s *390purchase and removal, under circumstances from which notice of appellees’ lien must be inferred.

*Davis, for appellant.*

*R. Mown, for appellees.*

The court properly adjudged that the horse was subject to ap-pellees’ attachment, but erred in rendering judgment on the bond. .The bond does not conform to the provisions of Sec. 713, Civil *Code;*and as the property was taken under an attachment, ahd not under an execution or a distress warrant, it would have been improper to take the bond therein provided for. Neither is it in conformity to sec. 235, under the provisions of which it should have been taken. The court should have ordered a surrender of the horse, to be sold in case the remaining property did not sell for a sum sufficient to satisfy appellees’ claim for rent. In case appellant can not surrender the horse, then appellee’s remedy will be by suit on the bond.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with his opinion.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.6

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our reports
and to all references to our firm included in or made part of the Registration
Statement on Form S-4 of Golden Sky Systems, Inc. of which this Exhibit forms a
part.

                                       CHMS, P.C.

                                       By: /s/ Rocky L. Torgeson

Sidney, Montana
11/25/98
****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘officially released’’ date.
All opinions are subjecttomodificationandtechnical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or ConnecticutAppellate Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative.
The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears onthe Commission on Official Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service andinthe Connecticut LawJournal andboundvolumes of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut.

******************************************************NATION-BAILEY v

. BAILEY—CONCURRENCE PALMER, J., concurring. I agree with the majority that the Appellate Court correctly concluded that the trial court improperly had construed § 3 (B) ofthe parties’ separation agreement as vesting discretion in the trial court to modify rather than to terminate the alimony payments ofthe defendant, Adrian Peter Bailey, followingthat court’s findingthattheplaintiff, Rebecca Nation-Bailey, had cohabited within the meaning of General Statutes § 46b-86 (b). In contrast to the majority, however, I am not persuaded that the separation agreement is ‘‘plain and unambiguous’’ on that point because, in myview, aplausible argument canbe made thatthe agreementdoes give the trial court such discretion. See Nation-Bailey v. Bailey, 144 Conn. App. 319, 330–37, 74A.3d433 (2013) ( Borden, J

., dissenting) (discussing reasons why parties’ separation agreement shouldbereadtoincorporate ‘‘thefullpanoplyofremedies provided by § 46b-86 [b], including the power to modify

. . . and suspend

. . . the payment of periodicalimony’’ [internalquotationmarks omitted]). Nevertheless, I do believe that the better reading of the parties’ agreement is that it limits the trial court’s authority to terminating alimony upon a finding of cohabitation. I therefore concur in the result.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4803 

To designate the memorial to Edmund S. Muskie located in Rumford, Maine, 

as a national memorial. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2004 

Mr. MICHAUD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To designate the memorial to Edmund S. Muskie located 

in Rumford, Maine, as a national memorial. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL MEMORIAL TO 

4 VETERAN EDMUND S. MUSKIE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The memorial to Edmund S. 

6 Muskie located in Rumford, Maine, is hereby designated 

7 as the ‘‘Edmund S. Muskie National Memorial’’. 

8 (b) ADMINISTRATION.—The memorial referred to in 

9 subsection (a) is hereby a unit of the National Park Sys10 tem. The Secretary of the Interior shall administer the 
2 

•HR 4803 IH 

1 memorial in accordance with the laws generally applicable 

2 to units of the National Park System. 

Æ
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6518

DWAYNE PEAKS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. GANOE, Correctional Officer , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Paula Xinis , District Judge. ( 1:22

- cv - 00906

- PX )

Submitted : October 19, 2023 Decided: October 24, 2023

Before KING and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Dwayne Peaks , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6518 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Dwayne Peaks appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his amended
42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Peaks v. Ganoe , No. 1:22

- cv - 00906

- PX (D. Md. Apr. 24, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6518 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ALAN J. AIRINGTON,

Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

____________________ 

2011-7188 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in Case No. 10-1246, Chief Judge Bruce 

E. Kasold. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

THOMAS R. BENDER, Chisholm Chisholm & Kilpatrick, 

LLP, of Providence, Rhode Island, argued for claimantappellant. On the brief was ZACHARY M. STOLZ. 

JAMES SWEET, Trial Attorney, United States 

Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for 

respondent-appellee. With him on the brief were TONY 

WEST, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, 
Director, and MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR., Assistant Director. 

Of counsel on the brief were MICHAEL J. TIMINSKI, Deputy 

Assistant General Counsel, and TRACEY P. WARREN, Staff 

Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, 

of Washington, DC. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MOORE, and O’MALLEY, Circuit 

Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 June 19, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

   
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Registration Statement of our report dated April 24, 1998
(except for the matters in Note 10 for which the date is June 5, 1998), for
the three months ended March 31, 1998, and for the period from inception (April
22, 1997) through December 31, 1997, and to all references to our Firm included
in this Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1.
    



                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Dallas, Texas
June 5, 1998