Abatement Order filed December 20, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00806-CR

____________

JARVIS L. BARBER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from County Criminal Court at Law No. 7

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2008621

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellant is represented by retained counsel, Frederick Wilson. On 

November 28, 2016, time to file appellant’s brief expired without a brief and no 

motion for extension of time was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). Counsel was 

notified on December 1, 2016, that no brief had been received. No response from 

appellant has been received.

Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b) (a copy of which is attached) the judge of 

County Criminal Court at Law No. 7 shall (1) immediately conduct a hearing, at 
which appellant, appellant’s counsel, and state’s counsel shall participate, either in 

person or by video teleconference, to determine (a) whether appellant desires to 

prosecute his appeal; (b) whether appellant is indigent; (c) if not indigent, whether 

appellant has abandoned the appeal or whether appellant has failed to make 

necessary arrangements for filing a brief; (d) the reason for the failure to file a brief; 

(e) if appellant desires to continue the appeal, a date certain when appellant’s brief 

will be filed; and (2) prepare a record, in the form of a reporter’s record, of the 

hearing. If appellant is indigent, the judge shall take such measures as may be 

necessary to assure effective representation of counsel, which may include the 

appointment of new counsel. The judge shall see that a record of the hearing is 

made, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial 

clerk to forward a transcribed record of the hearing, a videotape or compact disc, if 

any, containing a recording of the video teleconference, and a supplemental clerk’s 

record containing the findings and conclusions. Those records shall be filed with 

the clerk of this court on or before January 19, 2017.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will 

also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or 

the Court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any 

party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to 

schedule a hearing in compliance with this Court’s order. If the parties do not 

request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and 

notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAM
RULE 38. REQUISITES OF BRIEFS

Tex. R. App. P. 38.8. Failure of Appellant to File Brief. 

(b) Criminal Cases.

(1) Effect. An appellant’s failure to timely file a brief does not 

authorize either dismissal of the appeal or, except as provided in (4), consideration 

of the appeal without briefs.

(2) Notice. If the appellant’s brief is not timely filed, the appellate clerk 

must notify counsel for the parties and the trial court of that fact. If the appellate 

court does not receive a satisfactory response within ten days, the court must order 

the trial court to immediately conduct a hearing to determine whether the appellant 

desires to prosecute his appeal, whether the appellant is indigent, or, if not indigent, 

whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal, and to make appropriate 

findings and recommendations.

(3) Hearing. In accordance with (2), the trial court must conduct any 

necessary hearings, make appropriate findings and recommendations, and have a 

record of the proceedings prepared, which record—including any order and 

findings—must be sent to the appellate court.

(4) Appellate Court Action. Based on the trial court’s record, the 

appellate court may act appropriately to ensure that the appellant’s rights are 

protected, including initiating contempt proceedings against appellant’s counsel. If 

the trial court has found that the appellant no longer desires to prosecute the appeal, 

or that the appellant is not indigent but has not made the necessary arrangements for 

filing a brief, the appellate court may consider the appeal without briefs, as justice 

may require.