alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended March 2, 2008,
(the Report), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Leonard R. Stein-SapirLeonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer  48
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 40269 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
RUBEN ZAMORA

- NUNEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:11

- CR

- 81

- 1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Ruben Zamora

- Nunez, federal prisoner # 83167

- 279, challenges the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion, wherein he sought a reduction of his 108

- month prison term for possession with intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana based on Amendment 782 to the United States Sen tencing Guidelines. He contends that the district court did not truly take

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 22, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40269 Document: 00513810065 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/22/2016No. 16

- 40269

2 into account his history and characteristics and misapprehended the nature and circumstances of his offense. We review the denial of a § 3582(c)(2) motion for an abuse of discret ion. United States v. Evans , 587 F.3d 667, 672 (5th Cir. 2009). Here, the district court’s order reflects its consideration of Zamora

- Nunez’s motion, the policy statement under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. Zamora

- Nunez essentially ask s us to reweigh the district court’s balancing of the § 3553(a) factors. However, “[t]he decision whether to reduce the sentence is in the sound discretion of the district judge.” United States v. Whitebird , 55 F.3d 1007, 1009 (5th Cir. 1995). Because t he record shows that the district

cour t gave due consideration to the § 3582(c)(2) motion and the § 3553(a) factors, Zamora

- Nunez has not shown an abuse of discretion

. See id. at 1010. AFFIRMED. Case: 16-40269 Document: 00513810065 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/22/2016
#### Barnes *v.*Roemer et al.

*Record.—Process.—Bill of*Exceptions.—The summons and the return of service thereof should, without any order of court or *bill*of exceptions, *be*part of the record, in cases tried on default of appearance.

*590Supreme Court.—Evidence.—Presumption.—The evidence not being in the record on appeal, the Supreme Court will presume it supported the finding and judgment of the court below.

Same.—Where the judgment is for too large a sum, the application must be made first to the court below to correct it, or the Supreme Court will not examine the question.

APPEAL from the Grant Circuit Court.

Pettit, J.

This suit was brought by the appellees against the appellant, on two promissory notes, with stipulations in them to pay attorney’s fees and all expenses of collection. The summons, service, and return are all properly in the transcript. The defendant was defaulted, and the cause submitted to the court; finding and judgment for the plaintiffs for four hundred and twenty-nine dollars and ninety-nine cents, whicli included the amount of the notes and interest due thereon, and thirty-nine dollars and nine cents for attorney’s fees and expenses. Bail for the stay of execution was put in, and afterward a new departure was taken by bringing this appeal. The errors assigned are, “first, the process in said cause is not made a part of the record, by order of the court or otherwise; second, the judgment rendered is for a much larger sum than is due on said notes; third, the complaint does not authorize judgment for more than said notes, and it is for a much larger sum.”

To the first assignment of error, it is enough to say that the process, service, and return are in the record as they always should be in case of- default, without any order of the court or bill of exceptions.

As to the second assignment of error, it is a sufficient answer to say that the evidence is not in the transcript, and we cannot see what it showed as to attorney’s fees and other expenses, but must presume that it warranted the finding and judgment.

As to the third assignment of errors, we will say that the complaint fully and clearly warranted a judgment for more than the face of the notes and interest.

If the judgment was too large, the party aggrieved should have made application to the court below to modify or cor*591rect it, before an appeal to this court. This doctrine has been uniformly held by this court. I Abbott Ind. Dig. 45, secs. 228, 229, and the collection of cases there cited. We cannot fail to see that this case has been brought here for delay merely, and not to correct any wrong or error committed by the court below, and in such case we feel it to be our duty to add the highest per cent, allowed by law.

*J. Brownlee*and *H. Brownlee,*for appellant.

*A. Steele*and *R. T. St. John,*for appellees.

The judgment is affirmed, with- ten per cent, damages, at the costs of the appellant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,945,174
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,945,174
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,945,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,281,887
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,530
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,629,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,945,174
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,138
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,238,941
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,195,803)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 24

 

United States

Securities andExchange Commission

Washington, D.C.20549

 

|  | Re:      ALLTEL Corporation

Commission      File No. 1-4996

1934      Act Filings on Form 10-K

Authorized      Representatives
Gentlemen:

The above Company is the issuer of securities registered under Section 12 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (The "Act"). Each of the personssigning his name below confirms, as of the date appearing opposite hissignature, that each of the "Authorized Representatives" named belowis authorized on his behalf to sign and submit to the Securities and ExchangeCommission such filings on Form 10-K as are required by the Act. Each person sosigning also confirms the authority of each of the Authorized Representatives todo and perform on his behalf, any and all acts and things requisite or necessaryto assure compliance by the signing person with the Form 10-K requirements. Theauthority confirmed herein shall remain in effect as to each person signing hisname below until such time as the Commission shall receive from such person awritten communication terminating or modifying the authority. Each personsigning his name below expressly revokes all authority heretofore given orexecuted by him with respect to such filings under the Act.

 

 

Authorized Representatives

 

ScottT. Ford

FrancisX. Frantz

JefferyR. Gardner

 

Date              /s/      Warren A. Stephens  02/14/02
 

  |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT INCLUDED IN ITS QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          23,538
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  485,620<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,135<F2>
<INVENTORY>                                     29,397
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               599,820
<PP&E>                                       1,831,725
<DEPRECIATION>                                 683,014
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,198,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          335,952
<BONDS>                                        818,775
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,028
<OTHER-SE>                                     857,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,198,953
<SALES>                                      2,107,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,115,710
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,899,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                73,822
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F3>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,869
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 93,724
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,803
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             60,921
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    60,921
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58
<FN>
<F1>Excludes $25,831 of long-term notes receivable.
<F2>Excludes $2,997 of allowance for long-term notes receivable.
<F3>Included in Total costs and expenses line.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




Summary of Fiscal 2006 Target Short-Term Incentive Percentages for the Named

Executive Officers of Lennox International Inc.




     On December 9, 2005, the Board of Directors of Lennox International Inc. (the “Company”), upon
recommendation of the Company’s Compensation Committee, established target short-term incentive
percentages for each of Robert E. Schjerven, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Harry J.
Ashenhurst, Ph.D., the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer and the
interim President and Chief Operating Officer of Worldwide Refrigeration, Scott J. Boxer, the
Company’s Executive Vice President and President and Chief Operating Officer of Service Experts
Inc. and Robert J. McDonough, the Company’s Executive Vice President and President and Chief
Operating Officer of World Wide Heating & Cooling, ranging from 70% to 110% of the executive
officer’s annual base salary based on performance metrics comprised of net income and cash flow.
For named executive officers that are also Presidents of a business unit, 50% of such executive
officer’s target will be based on his business unit’s results and 50% will be based on aggregate
results of the Company. 50% of the target payment may be achieved with the defined threshold
performance and up to 150% of the target payment may be achieved with the defined maximum
performance. In addition, for performance above the maximum level, each business unit may select
one of the above named performance metrics to function as a multiplier of 1.0 to 1.5 of the
incentive payment as determined by the other metrics, resulting in a potential payment of up to
225% of the target payment. The foregoing criteria are substantially similar to the criteria used
to establish target short-term incentive percentages for fiscal 2005.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

N o. 04

- 21

- 00007

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF H.S. , a Child

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019PA01861

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED.

Appellant is unable to afford payment of costs; no costs are taxed in this appeal.

SIGNED June 23, 2021.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Plaintiff, )

vs. )

) CRIMINAL NO. 08-00378-001-CG

GAIL RENITA ALLEN, )

Defendant. )

)

and )

)

FELDER SERVICES, INC., )

and its successors or assigns, )

)

Garnishee. )

ORDER AMENDING FINAL ORDER OF WAGE GARNISHMENT

This matter comes before the Court on the United States’ Motion to Amend 

Final Order of Wage Garnishment, filed on August 5, 2015. (Doc. 32). The Court 

being fully advised in the premises, and for good cause shown, finds the Motion 

should be, and is hereby granted. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

1. The Final Order of Wage Garnishment, (Doc. 31), is hereby amended 

and the Garnishee is directed on the first pay period following receipt of this Order,

to begin withholding 10% per pay period from the Defendant’s net pay.

2. The Garnishee, Felder Services, Inc., shall pay into the hands of 

the U.S. Clerk of Court, at least monthly, the lesser of:

a. 10% per pay period

Case 1:08-cr-00378-CG-C Document 33 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 3
2

b. All amounts of Defendant’s disposable earnings in excess of thirty 

times the federal minimum hourly wage.

See 15 U.S.C. § 1673(a).

To calculate the disposable earnings, the Garnishee will subtract the 

following from wages, commissions, bonuses, and income:

1. Federal Income Tax

2. Federal Social Security Tax;

3. Medicare

4. State Adjusted Gross Income Tax;

5. County Option Tax (if any).

Checks should be made payable to, and mailed to:

Clerk of Court

U.S. District Court

113 St. Joseph Street

Mobile, AL 36602

Ref: Gail Renita Allen/08-00378-001

3. These garnished sums are to be applied upon the Judgment rendered 

in this case on May 20, 2009, in the amount of $52,200.00, upon which there is an 

unpaid balance of 42,422.53 as of August 6, 2015. These deductions are to 

continue until the unpaid balance until the garnishee no longer has possession or 

control of salary, wages, or other compensation belonging to the defendant. 

Case 1:08-cr-00378-CG-C Document 33 Filed 08/06/15 Page 2 of 3
3

4. Garnishee will notify the United States Attorney’s Office, Attn: 

Financial Litigation Unit, 63 S. Royal Street, Suite 600, Mobile, Alabama 36602, 

within ten (10) days of defendant's termination or resignation.

5. Plaintiff, United States, will make an annual accounting to the 

Garnishee and Defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §3205(c)(9)(A). 

6. The United States will conduct a bi-annual review of Defendant’s 

financial condition and ability to pay, and may request this Court amend the wage 

garnishment percentage withheld.

7. This Order shall take effect after all prior orders of garnishment, if 

any, have been satisfied. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3205(c)(8), judicial orders and 

garnishments for the support of a person shall have priority over this Writ of 

Garnishment. As to any other writ of garnishment or levy, this Writ of 

Garnishment has prior over writs which are issued later in time.

DONE and ORDERED this 6th day of August, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:08-cr-00378-CG-C Document 33 Filed 08/06/15 Page 3 of 3
Flagship Homes, LTD. d/b/a s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 15, 2014

No. 04-14-00568-CV

Julian CALDERAS, Jr. and Erica Calderas,

Appellants

v.

FLAGSHIP HOMES, LTD. d/b/a Prestige Homes,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-04330

Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record in this accelerated appeal was originally due July 8, 2014. This 

appeal, originally filed in this court, was transferred by the Texas Supreme Court to the First 

Court of Appeals in Houston, Texas. On August 8, 2014, the Texas Supreme Court transferred 

the appeal back to this court. The reporter’s record remains unfiled.

Ms. Yvonne O’Bar is the court reporter responsible for preparing, certifying, and filing 

the reporter’s record in this appeal. Ms. O’Bar is hereby ORDERED to file the record in this 

court no later than August 25, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(1). If the record is not received 

by such date, a show cause order shall issue directing Ms. O’Bar to appear on a day certain and 

show cause why she should not be held in contempt for failing to file the record. The clerk of 

this court shall cause a copy of this order to be served on Ms. O’Bar by certified mail, return 

receipt requested, and by regular United States mail.

Because the trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the 

appellate record is timely filed, the clerk of this court shall also cause a copy of this order to be 

served upon the trial court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c).

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of August, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4829 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4829

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 7, 2004

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 103 East Kleberg in Kingsville, Texas, as the ``Irma Rangel Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 103 
East Kleberg in Kingsville, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 
``Irma Rangel Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Irma Rangel Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 6, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Timothy A. Dawson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Mississippi Chemical Corporation (the "Company") hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, dated as of October 16, 2003, 2003, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report") by the Company fully complies with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial operations and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Timothy A. Dawson
                                                                                             Timothy A. Dawson
                                                                                             Senior Vice President and
                                                                                             Chief Financial Officer

October 16, 2003