alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
January 11, 2008 ***DRAFT AGENDA***DRAFT AGENDA*** 

March 5-6, 2008 

MOBILE ID WORKSHOP DRAFT AGENDA 

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM 

OPENING 

REVIEW OF AGENDA & PROPOSED CHANGES 

PURPOSE OF WORKSHOP 

• Review the accomplishment of the November 29, 2007 workshop 

• Overview and discussion of the first proposed draft of the MobileID Best Practice 

report 

CONTINUE THE DEVELOPMENT OF MOBILE ID FINGERPRINT BEST PRACTICE 

REQUIREMENTS 

• Different levels of application profiles within each enrollment verification, and 

identification function 

• Compression algorithms and compression ratio issues relating to enrollment, 

verification, & identification applications 

• Number of fingers used for enrollment, verification, & identification 

• Finger numbers used for enrollment, verification, & identification 

• Type 4 vs Type 14 record types for enrollment, verification, & identification 

• EBTS 8.00x transaction considerations 

• Image quality requirements for enrollment, verification, & identification 

• Content of returned responses for each transaction 

• Additional storage and transmission considerations 

FINGERPRINT EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE CERTIFICATIONS FOR 

ENROLLMENT, VERIFICATION, & IDENTIFICATION 

DISCUSSION OF MOBILE ID FACE BEST PRACTICE REQUIREMENTS 

• Enrollment, verification, and identification issues for image capture storage and 

transmission 

• Camera characteristics 

• Image size 

• Resolution on the face 

• Illumination/compression 

• Characteristics of capture (expression, glasses, hats, etc.) 

• Compression issues 

• Enrollment, verification, and identification 

• EBTS 8.00x transaction considerations 

• Additional storage and transmission consideration 

FACIAL CAPTURE EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE CERTIFICATIONS FOR 

ENROLLMENT, VERIFICATION, & IDENTIFICATION 

DISCUSSION OF MOBILE ID IRIS BEST PRACTICE REQUIREMENTS 
 

 

• Iris camera characteristics 

• Image size 

• Single or double iris acquisition 

• Additional data to go with iris image 

• Aspects of enrollment, verification and identification functions 

• EBTS 8.00x transaction considerations 

IRIS CAPTURE EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE CERTIFICATIONS FOR 

ENROLLMENT, VERIFICATION, & IDENTIFICATION 

MOBILE ID DEVICE FEATURES 

• Bar codes, RFID, etc 

• Size & weight considerations 

• Simple and consistent screen presentations 

SECURITY & ENCRYPTION REQUIREMENTS 

COMMUNICATION PROTOCOLS 

XML ISSUES REGARDING MOBILE ID DEVICES 

SESSION ISSUES 

• Loss of power or RF 

• Service availability 

FUTURE REQUIREMENTS 

WORKSHOP WRAP-UP & CONCLUSIONS 

- 2 -
11065.

#### Bracey *v.*The State.

Decided March 2, 1920.

Conviction of driving automobile while under the influence of liquor—certiorari; from Morgan superior court—Judge Park. October 2, 1919.

*M. Q. Few,*for plaintiff in error.

*Doyle Campbell, solicitor-general, A. Q. Foster, solicitor,*contra.

Luke, J.

1. The conviction of the defendant in this ease not depending solely upon circumstantial evidence, the court did not err in failing to charge the jury the law of circumstantial evidence, there being no request for such a charge.

2. There was no error in the charge of the court excepted to, and the evidence as shown by the answer to the petition for certiorari authorized the conviction of the defendant. Eor no 'reason assigned was it error to overrule the certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Broyles, *O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
#### The People v. Sylvester Parks.

*Liquor Iww*— Sale *by clerk to habitual drunkards.*

A liquor dealer cannot be beld criminally responsible for the sale of liquor by his clerk, and without his knowledge or concurrence, to habitual drunkards.

Exceptions before judgment from Berrien.

Submitted October 19.

Decided October 20.

Information under Act 259 of 1881 for selling liquor to drunken persons. Kespondent was convicted below. Conviction set aside.

Attorney General *Jacob J. Van Riper*for the People.

*N\ A. Hamilton*for respondent.

Campbell, J.

Respondent was convicted under the statute of 1881, making it a misdemeanor to sell intoxicating liquor to persons who are in the habit of becoming intoxicated. The sale was not made by respondent, but by a clerk. The court below held that the respondent was responsible for the knowledge of his clerk, as well as if he had known the condition of the vendee himself.

The statute in question prohibits sales by means of clerks as well as in person. Laws 1881, p. 355, § 12. And a subsequent section (13) makes violations of the statute misdemeanors, and punishable as such. But it would be an un just and inadmissible interpretation to construe such a provision as covering anything but an act in which the will of the respondent concurred in the sale. It it contrary to every rule of law to hold a person criminally responsible for an act in which he has taken no part. He can only be punished for what is his own wrong. Section 2 clearly implies the necessity of criminal intent as an element of the offense, and lays down certain rules of presumption involving per*334sonal knowledge of tbe act done. It makes the act of sale to an improper person presumptive evidence of such intent to violate the law. The case comes within the decision in *Faulks v. People*39 Mich. 200. It cannot be permissible to give any other construction, which would violate the elementary rules of criminal responsibility.

Whatever civil liability may arise from the acts of a clerk, the criminal responsibility must fall on the actual wrongdoers, who have done or been connected with the violation of the law by some fault of their own.

The conviction should be set aside and the case dismissed.

The other Justices concurred.
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
TO THE
PAUL MUELLER COMPANY
CONTRACT EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN
(As Restated Effective January 1, 2000)

|Section 9.01 of the Paul Mueller Company Contract Employees Retirement Plan (the "Plan") provides that the Employer may amend the Plan at any time.  In accordance with the provisions of that Section, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|2.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|The changes made to this Amendment shall be effective as of January 1, 1997.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Paul Mueller Company has caused this Amendment to be duly executed on its behalf this 11th day of December 2002.                            

| |  | PAUL MUELLER COMPANY
| |  | --------------------
| |  | By:                 
| |  | Title:              

|ATTEST |                        | 
|------ | ---------------------- | 
|By:    | /S/   RONALD W. GIELOW | 
|Title: | Assistant Secretary    | 



128

=============================================================================
#### Arthur E. BERKELEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry MASSANARI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-2334.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 24, 2001.

Decided May 10, 2001.

J. Lynn Bishop, Charlotte, NC, for appellant. Mark T. Calloway, United States Attorney, Joseph L. Brinkley, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, NC, for appellee.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Arthur E. Berkeley appeals the district court’s order upholding the administrative law judge’s denial of Social Security disability benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Berkeley v. Apfel,*No. CA-00-6-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 4.2

                         INTERNATIONAL HOME FOODS, INC.

             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERNATIONAL HOME FOODS, INC.
                             1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN

         THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERNATIONAL HOME FOODS, INC. 1997 STOCK
OPTION PLAN (this "Amendment") is made and adopted by International Home Foods,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), effective as of June 12, 1998.

                                    RECITALS

         WHEREAS, the board of directors approved and recommended to the
stockholders of the Company an increase (the "Increase") in the number of
shares of the Company's common stock, par value $.01 per share, available for
issuance under the International Home Foods, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan (the
"Plan") from 8,444,021 shares to 13,444,021 shares; and

         WHEREAS, on May 6, 1998, the stockholders of the Company approved the
Increase.

                                   AMENDMENT

         NOW, THEREFORE, Section 3 of the Plan is hereby amended to read, in
its entirety, as follows:

         "3.  Shares Available.  Subject to the adjustments provided in Section
10, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value of
the Company (the "Common Stock") in respect of which Options may be granted for
all purposes under the Plan shall be 13,444,021 shares.  If, for any reason,
any shares as to which Options have been granted cease to be subject to
purchase thereunder, including the expiration of such Option, the termination
of such Option prior to exercise, or the forfeiture of such Option, such shares
shall thereafter be available for grants under the Plan.  Options granted under
the Plan may be fulfilled in accordance with the terms of the Plan with (i)
authorized and unissued shares of the Common Stock, (ii) issued shares of such
Common Stock held in the Company's treasury, or (iii) issued shares of Common
Stock reacquired by the Company in each situation as the Board of Directors or
the Committee may determine from time to time."

         Except as expressly set forth herein, the Plan shall remain in full
force and effect without further amendment or modification.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, acting by and through its officer
hereunto duly authorized, has executed this Amendment effective as of the date
first written above.

                                   INTERNATIONAL HOME FOODS, INC.
                                  
                                  
                                  
                                   By: /s/ Michael J. Cramer 
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                            Michael J. Cramer
                                            Vice President
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     I, Leonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Morgan’sFoods, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended February 25,2007, (the “Report”), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Leonard R. Stein-Sapir     Leonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive OfficerMay 29, 2007
49
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                     CONSENT OF LANE GORMAN TRUBITT, L.L.P.
 
     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our report dated February 7, 1997, with respect to the financial
statements of Clark/Bardes, Inc. included in Amendment No. 4 to the Registration
Statement (Form S-1 No. 333-56799) and the related Prospectus of Clark/Bardes,
Inc. (the predecessor company to Clark/Bardes Holding, Inc.) for the
registration of its common stock.
 
                                             /s/ LANE GORMAN TRUBITT, L.L.P.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                LANE GORMAN TRUBITT, L.L.P.
 
Dallas, Texas
August 17, 1998
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12-1


     MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
     COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Twelve Months Ended  Twelve Months Ended  Twelve Months Ended
                                         -------------------  -------------------  -------------------
                                           December 31, 1996   December 31, 1995    December 31, 1994
                                         -------------------  -------------------  -------------------
<S>                                      <C>                  <C>                  <C>

EARNINGS AS DEFINED (1)
Pre-tax income                           $122,239                   $112,727           $ 89,707
Fixed charges                              53,831                     45,637             39,663
                                         --------                   --------           --------
 Earnings as defined                     $176,070                   $158,364           $129,370
                                         ========                   ========           ========
                                                                                               
FIXED CHARGES AS DEFINED (1)                                                                   
Interest on long-term debt               $ 43,163                   $ 35,820           $ 27,948
Interest on other borrowed funds            8,012                      7,053              9,093
Amortization of debt discounts, premium                                                        
 and expense                                1,081                        996                950
Interest implicit in rentals (2)            1,575                      1,768              1,672
                                         --------                   --------           --------
 Fixed charges as defined                $ 53,831                   $ 45,637           $ 39,663
                                         ========                   ========           ========
                                                                                               
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges           3.27                       3.47               3.26
                                         ========                   ========           ========
</TABLE>



Notes:
(1)  Earnings and fixed charges are defined and computed in accordance with
     instructions for Item 3 of Form S-3.
(2)  This amount is estimated to be a reasonable approximation of the
     interest portion of rentals.

MichCon is a guarantor of certain other debt.  Fixed charges related to such
debt are deemed to be immaterial and therefore have
been excluded from the above ratios.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000068619
<NAME> MOUNTAIN STATES RESOURCES CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1995
<CASH>                                              22
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    22
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      22
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          899,322
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     78,946
<COMMON>                                     4,843,348
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,821,594)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        22
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  113,611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (113,611)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (113,611)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF A. P

., A MINOR

CHILD,

Appellant

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 277

- C V

Appeal from the

388 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2015DCM2102 )

O R D E R

The Court has this day filed M. M. ’s motion challenging the trial court’s order requiring

M. M. to pay costs under Rule 145 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. See T EX .R.A PP .P.

145(f), (g)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that the trial court clerk and court reporter of the 388 th

District C ourt prepare and file with this Court the record of all trial court proceedings on the

declarant’s claim of indigence. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 145(g)(3). The record must be provided

without charge and filed with this Court on or before October 20, 2016. Any response to said

motion challenging the ruling by the trial court is due on or before October 30, 2016

.

IT IS SO ORDERED t his 7 th day of October , 20 1 6

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Hughes , JJ.
----

----

|   | ALLTEL                NEW LICENSE SUB, LLC |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|

|   |   | By:  /s/                  Holly L.                  Larkin                            |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Name:                Holly L. Larkin |
|--------|--------------------------------------|

|   | Title:                  Authorized Signatory |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | By:  /s/                  Ross A. Mac                  Intyre                   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Name:                Ross A. Mac Intyre |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|

|   | Title:                Vice President |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Quaker State Corporation on Form S-8 for the registration of 65,383 shares of
Capital Stock which may be issued under the Non-employee Director Restricted
Stock Agreement, and in the Section 10(a) prospectus used in connection
therewith, of our report dated January 27, 1998, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule of Quaker
State Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, which report is
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference of
our firm under the caption "Experts."

Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


Dallas, Texas
May 21, 1998