alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4486 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4486

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Anisic Aldehyde.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 2, 2004

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Anisic Aldehyde.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON ANISIC ALDEHYDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following:

``      9902.34.34       Anisic Aldehyde    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 123-11-                                                   31/2007
                         5) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2912.49.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7908

CLARENCE ROULHAC, JR.,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

B. S. JANEK, DMD, Dentist, Powhatan Correctional Center,

 Defendant – Appellee,

and

PRISON HEALTH SERVICES; LINDA RAY, Ms., Head Nurse, 

Powhatan Correctional Center; L. KUMP, Ms., Doctor, 

Powhatan Correctional Center; A. TONEY, Mr., Doctor, 

Powhatan Correctional Center; FRED SCHILLINGS, Dr., Health 

Service Director, VDOC,

 Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:10-cv-00408-HEH)

Submitted: March 19, 2013 Decided: April 9, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Roulhac, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin 

Muldowney, RAWLS, MCNELIS & MITCHELL, PC, Richmond, Virginia, 
2

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Roulhac, Jr., appeals the district court’s 

judgment denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims of 

deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Roulhac v. Janek, No. 3:10-cv-00408-HEH (E.D. Va. 

Dec. 23, 2011 & Feb. 16, 2012 & Oct. 9, 2012). We deny 

Roulhac’s motion to compel Defendants to provide dental care. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended February 27,
2011, (the Report), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Leonard R. Stein-SapirLeonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement - Jeffrey Katzenberg



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 Reference is made to that certain employment agreement dated as of October 8, 2004, as amended on November 1, 2004, between
Jeffrey Katzenberg and DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc. (the “Agreement”). Except as provided to the contrary, all capitalized terms herein shall have the same meaning as under the Agreement. 
  
 For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and the sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree to further amend the Agreement as follows: 
  
 1.
The first paragraph of Section 2.a. of the Agreement shall be deemed deleted and the following paragraph shall be deemed inserted in its place: 
  
 “Your title shall be “Chief Executive Officer” of Studio. You shall have such duties and responsibilities as are consistent with the
traditional position of Chief Executive Officer of publicly traded major entertainment and media corporations. No other individual shall have the title Chief Executive Officer or hold a position equal to or superior to yours or have any authority
equal to or superior to yours during the Employment Term without your consent. You shall report solely and directly to the Board of Directors of Studio.” 
  

2. The first sentence of Paragraph 6. of the Agreement shall be deemed deleted and the following sentence shall be deemed inserted in its place: 
  
 “During the Employment Term, you are expected and required to travel,
entertain, and incur expenses on Studio business and in the performance of your duties hereunder in approximately the same manner and at approximately the same level as other CEO’s of major motion picture, television and record companies.”

  
 Except as expressly modified herein, the Agreement is not modified or amended
in any respect and, as modified herein, the Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. 
  
 Effective as of December 5, 2005 
  
 ACCEPTED
AND AGREED TO: 
  

									
	 	 	 	 	 DREAMWORKS ANIMATION SKG, INC.

				
	 /s/ JEFFREY KATZENBERG
	 	 	 	By:	 	 KATHERINE KENDRICK

	 JEFFREY KATZENBERG
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 Its:
	 	 General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
**RB** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0420 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHARLES MICHAEL BYRNE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including Nove mber 1 6 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court October 13 2020

10/13/2020
Case Number: DA 19-0420
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
The Board of Directors
NorthWestNet, Inc.:
 
     We consent to the use of our report relating to the financial statements of
NorthWestNet, Inc. as of June 30, 1996 and for the six months ended June 30,
1996 and the eight months ended February 28, 1997, and the financial statements
of NorthWest Academic Computing Consortium, Inc. as of June 30, 1995 and for the
year ended June 30, 1995 and the six months ended December 31, 1995, included
herein and to the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the
Prospectus.
 
                                                /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                   KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Seattle, Washington
   
December 14, 1998
NVLAP LAB BULLETIN NUMBER: LB-122-2020 PAGE: 1 of 1

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

ISSUE DATE:

May 14, 2020

LAB BULLETIN

NUMBER: LB-122-2020

LAP: Construction 

Materials Testing

SUBJECT: Release of NIST Handbook 150-5, 2020 Edition

NIST Handbook 150-5, which presents the technical requirements and guidance for the 

accreditation of laboratories under the NVLAP Construction Materials Testing LAP, has been 

revised. 

The following are the primary changes that have been made in the 2020 edition:

• the numbering has been updated to reflect that used by ISO/IEC 17025:2017, General 

requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.

 

• requirements that closely duplicated existing requirements in either ISO/IEC 17025 or NIST 

Handbook 150 have been removed.

The 2020 edition of NIST Handbook 150-5 supersedes and replaces the 2005 edition effective 

immediately. It is available for downloading (PDF format) from the NVLAP website 

<http://www.nist.gov/nvlap> under NVLAP Program-Specific Handbooks. The corresponding 

NIST Handbook 150-5 Checklist (ISO/IEC 17025:2017) has also been updated and posted on the 

NVLAP website under NVLAP Publications and Forms.

Questions concerning the revised handbook or requirements for accreditation should be directed 

to Timothy Rasinski at 301-975-6697, or <timothy.rasinski@nist.gov>.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             423
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,452
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (102)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,896
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,703
<PP&E>                                          11,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,111)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,646
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,646
<SALES>                                         12,976
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,017
<CGS>                                            9,983
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (65)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   102
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 292
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     94
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 94
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,159)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,065)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Radient Pharmaceuticals Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Akio Ariura, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 23, 2009
/s/ Akio AriuraAkio AriuraChief Financial Officer and SecretaryRadient Pharmaceuticals Corporation





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification
will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
1 of 2

Status of the US-Mexico MRA Annex I 

Standards Currently Available for Designation

April 20, 2020

 Include the Technical Provision on 

Scope of Accreditation 

Include Associated NOM on 

Scope of Accreditation 

Technical Provision

(Published by IFT)

Mexican Official Standard

(Published by SE)

IFT-004-2016 Technical Provision IFT-004-2016, Interface 

to public networks for terminal equipment. 

(PUBLISHED – January 21, 2016)

(IN FORCE – January 20, 2016)

NOM-196-SCFI-2016

(Mexican Official Standard 

that replaces NOM-EM015-SCFI-2015)

NOM-196-SCFI-2016, Products. Terminal 

equipment that is connected or interconnected 

through wired access to a public 

telecommunications network.

(PUBLISHED – November 7, 2016)

(IN FORCE – January 6, 2017)

IFT-005-2016 Technical Provision IFT-005-2016: Digital 

interface to public networks (digital interface 

at 2 048 kbit/s and at 34 368 kbit/s).

(PUBLISHED – January 21, 2016)

(IN FORCE – January 20, 2016)

NOM-218-SCFI-2017

(Mexican Official Standard 

that replaces NOM-EM017-SCFI-2016)

NOM-218-SCFI-2017, Digital interface to public 

networks (Digital interface to 2 048 kbit/s and to 

34 368 kbit/s).

(PUBLISHED – February 15, 2018)

(IN FORCE – April 16, 2018)

IFT-008-2015 Technical Provision IFT-008-2015: 

Radiocommunication systems using the 

spread spectrum technique - Radio frequency 

communication equipment and digital 

modulation to operate in the bands 902-928 

MHz, 2400-2483.5 MHz and 5725-5850 MHzSpecifications, limits and test methods.

(PUBLISHED – October 19, 2015)

(IN FORCE – October 20, 2015)

NOM-208-SCFI-2016

(Mexican Official Standard 

that replaces NOM-EM016-SCFI-2015)

NOM-208-SCFI-2016, Products. 

Radiocommunication systems employing the 

spread spectrum technique - Frequency hopping 

and digital modulation radiocommunication 

equipment to operate in the bands 902 MHz-928 

MHz, 2400 MHz-2483.5 MHz and 5725 MHz-5850 

MHz - Specifications and test methods.

(PUBLISHED – February 7, 2017)

(IN FORCE – April 8, 2017)

Table updated by NIST on 4/20/2020. Several out of date NOMs included on the prior version (November 26, 2018) have been removed.
move frontV 1
move frontH 0
move frontL 2.0
move Vsample -10
move Hsample1 0
move backL 0
move backL2 1.5
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

ISSUE DATE:

April 1, 2014

LAB BULLETIN

NUMBER: LB-81-2014

LAP: Construction 

Materials Testing

SUBJECT: Nuclear Density-Moisture Gauges

This bulletin is effective immediately and supersedes and replaces NVLAP Lab Bulletin 

LB-44-2009, Nuclear Density-Moisture Gauges, issued in 2009.

This bulletin updates the requirement for the use of mutually recognized calibration service providers 

for the calibration of nuclear density-moisture gauges for construction materials testing laboratories.

NIST Handbook 150, Annex B, B.3.3 states: “NVLAP-accredited laboratories . . . shall use 

accredited calibration laboratory services wherever available. Accredited calibration laboratories are 

those accredited by NVLAP or by any accrediting body with which NVLAP has a mutual recognition 

arrangement.”

In the time since the previous Lab Bulletin was issued, there has been a significant increase in the 

number of calibration service providers that are accredited to perform calibrations of nuclear densitymoisture gauges. Based on this number of providers and their locations, NVLAP-accredited 

construction materials testing laboratories shall use an accredited calibration laboratory to provide 

this service.

During the next on-site assessment, a nonconformity will be cited if the construction materials testing 

laboratory is not using the calibration services of a mutually recognized accredited calibration 

laboratory. The nonconformity can be resolved if the laboratory provides 1) documentation of the 

reasons the testing laboratory cannot use an accredited calibration laboratory; 2) evidence of an audit 

in accordance with NIST Handbook 150, Annex B, to show that traceability has been established for 

the calibration of the nuclear density-moisture gauges; and 3) evidence that the laboratory has made 

arrangements for the next scheduled calibration to be performed by an accredited calibration 

laboratory.

If the laboratory cannot provide evidence to resolve the nonconformity, test methods that require the 

use of a nuclear density-moisture gauge will be deleted from the NVLAP scope of accreditation.

This bulletin has also been posted on the Program-Specific Handbooks and Lab Bulletins page of the 

NVLAP website (http://www.nist.gov/nvlap). 

Questions concerning the construction materials testing requirements for accreditation should be 

directed to Beth Hackett at 301-975-6113, or <bethany.hackett@nist.gov>.

NVLAP LAB BULLETIN NUMBER: LB-81-2014 PAGE: 1 of 1
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4629 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the alternative 

minimum tax on individuals by permitting the deduction for State and 

local taxes and to adjust the exemption amounts for inflation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 21, 2004 

Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. FEENEY, Mr. CHOCOLA, Mr. 

WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr. 

PENCE, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. ISTOOK, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. GOODE, 

Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. NORWOOD, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. 

PAUL, Mr. WOLF, Mr. SOUDER, and Mr. ISAKSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the alternative minimum tax on individuals by permitting 

the deduction for State and local taxes and to adjust 

the exemption amounts for inflation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘AMT Middle Class 

5 Fairness Act of 2004’’. 
2 

•HR 4629 IH 

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATIONS TO ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX 

2 ON INDIVIDUALS. 

3 (a) REPEAL OF LIMIT ON DEDUCTION FOR STATE

4 AND LOCAL TAXES.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

5 56(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

6 to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—No deduction shall be 

8 allowed for any miscellaneous itemized deduc9 tion (as defined in section 67(b)).’’. 

10 (b) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—Subsection (d) 

11 of section 55 of such Code is amended by adding at the 

12 end the following new paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(4) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.— 

14 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a tax15 able year beginning in a calendar year after 

16 2004, each of the dollar amounts contained in 

17 subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1) 

18 shall be increased by an amount equal to— 

19 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

20 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de21 termined under section 1(f )(3) for the cal22 endar year in which the taxable year be23 gins, determined by substituting ‘calendar 

24 year 2003’ for ‘calendar year 1992’ in sub25 paragraph (B) thereof. 
3 

•HR 4629 IH 

1 ‘‘(B) ROUNDING.—Any increase deter2 mined under subparagraph (A) shall be rounded 

3 to the nearest multiple of $100.’’. 

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

6 December 31, 2004. 

Æ
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Akio Ariura, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AMDL, Inc. for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the small business issuer and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s firstfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: November 19, 2007   /s/ Akio Ariura   Akio Ariura  Chief Financial Officer