alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Kentucky Central R. R. Company *v.*R. T. Houston.

Carriers — Ejection of Passenger.

■A conductor had no right to eject an intoxicated passenger who was conducting himself in a proper manner except that he was insisting that he had paid his fare while he was holding the ticket in his hand, where another offered to pay his fare, which the conductor refused to accept, and ejected the passenger because “he had lied to him.”

APPEAL PROM BRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT.

September 17, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The weight of the testimony conduces to show that the appellee had purchased a ticket for his passage from Falmouth to Catauba. It is immaterial whether the ticket was obtained at Falmouth of the agent of the company or from its agent at Cataubaj if from an agent authorized to sell tickets his acts must bind the company. The proof shows that appellee was much intoxicated but still conducting himself in a proper manner except in insisting that he had paid his fare. This statement was the result of his drinking and in every other respect his demeanor was as unobjectionable so far as the proof shows as that of any other passenger. His friends, who were on the way to the same town with him, were under the impression that he had a ticket and some of them saw it in his hand, and it is certain that one was found on the ground at the place where he was ejected from the cars. His. friends interposed when they saw that the conductor was about to put appellee off the train and offered to pay his fare, which was ten cents, but the conductor refused to receive it, not for the reason that the party proffering to pay had no money, but because the appellee, to use the conductor’s *97own language, had lied to him. It is true no tender was made by Brown of the amount of money required to pay appellee’s passage. He says, however, that he had the money and with his hands in his pocket offered to pay, but the conductor refused, saying that “he would put him off any time as he had lied to him,” indicating clearly that his object was more to punish him for this breach of moral duty than to receive the money for his passage. Others desired to pay the fare also, - but the conductor was so determined and hasty in his efforts to eject appellee that he had him out of the car before his other friends could interfere.' That the conductor had the right to put him off the car in a proper manner upon his failure to pay his fare, there can be no- doubt, but it is equally as clear that his friend had the right to pay for him. It would be a. singular rule to adopt that one traveling upon railroads must produce his own ticket or his own money and if not, although his friend may offer to, to clothe the conductor with the power, as seems to have been exercised in this, case, to eject him rudely from the cars. The instructions were in no sense prejudicial to the appellant, and the damages scarcely adequate for the perpetration of such a wrong.

*Ramon, Stevenson, Myers, Drane, for appellant.*

*Lee, for appellee.*

Judgment *affirmed.*
SUBROUTINE NORPDF(X,PDF)
C
C     PURPOSE--THIS SUBROUTINE COMPUTES THE PROBABILITY DENSITY
C              FUNCTION VALUE FOR THE NORMAL (GAUSSIAN)
C              DISTRIBUTION WITH MEAN = 0 AND STANDARD DEVIATION = 1. 
C              THIS DISTRIBUTION IS DEFINED FOR ALL X AND HAS
C              THE PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION
C              F(X) = (1/SQRT(2*PI))*EXP(-X*X/2). 
C     INPUT  ARGUMENTS--X      = THE SINGLE PRECISION VALUE AT
C                                WHICH THE PROBABILITY DENSITY
C                                FUNCTION IS TO BE EVALUATED.
C     OUTPUT ARGUMENTS--PDF    = THE SINGLE PRECISION PROBABILITY
C                                DENSITY FUNCTION VALUE.
C     OUTPUT--THE SINGLE PRECISION PROBABILITY DENSITY
C             FUNCTION VALUE PDF.
C     PRINTING--NONE.
C     RESTRICTIONS--NONE.
C     OTHER DATAPAC   SUBROUTINES NEEDED--NONE.
C     FORTRAN LIBRARY SUBROUTINES NEEDED--EXP.
C     MODE OF INTERNAL OPERATIONS--SINGLE PRECISION.
C     LANGUAGE--ANSI FORTRAN. 
C     REFERENCES--JOHNSON AND KOTZ, CONTINUOUS UNIVARIATE
C                 DISTRIBUTIONS--1, 1970, PAGES 40-111.
C     WRITTEN BY--JAMES J. FILLIBEN
C                 STATISTICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY (205.03)
C                 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
C                 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20234
C                 PHONE:  301-921-2315
C     ORIGINAL VERSION--JUNE      1972. 
C     UPDATED         --SEPTEMBER 1975. 
C     UPDATED         --NOVEMBER  1975. 
C
C---------------------------------------------------------------------
C
      DATA C/.3989422804/
C
      IPR=6
C
C     CHECK THE INPUT ARGUMENTS FOR ERRORS.
C     NO INPUT ARGUMENT ERRORS POSSIBLE 
C     FOR THIS DISTRIBUTION.
C
C-----START POINT-----------------------------------------------------
C
      PDF=C*EXP(-(X*X)/2.0)
C
      RETURN
      END
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Michigan
Bell Telephone Company's December 31, 1995 Financial Statements and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          17,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  701,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                    37,700
<INVENTORY>                                      7,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               709,400
<PP&E>                                       7,775,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,657,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,142,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          805,500
<BONDS>                                      1,093,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,721,800
<OTHER-SE>                                   (399,700)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,142,700
<SALES>                                              0<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,964,400
<CGS>                                                0<F3>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,106,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,400)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                38,300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              90,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                770,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                   259,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            511,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   511,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Securities are not material and therefore have not been stated separately in
the financial statements.  This amount is included in the Cash tag.
<F2>Net sales of tangible products is not more than 10% of total operating revenues
and therefore has not been stated separately in the financial statements
pursuant to Regulation S-X, Rule 5-03(b).  This amount is included in the
"Total Revenues" tag.
<F3>Cost of tangible goods sold is included in cost of service and products in the
financial statements and the "Total Cost" tag, pursuant to Regulation S-X, Rule
5-03(b).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 03-15-00539-CR

MATTHEW DIAZ, } Appellant } } IN THE COURT } OF APPEALS } OF THE THIRD v. } SUPREME JUDICIAL } DISTRICT THE STATE OF TEXAS }

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS: Comes now John Kuchera, undersigned counsel for Appellant, pursuant to Rule 38.6(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and files this motion for anextension of thirty (30) days in which to the file Appellant’s brief in the aboveentitled and numbered cause. In support of this motion, undersigned counsel would show the Court the following.

Counsel was notified by this Court on October 28, 2015 that Appellant’s brief was overdue. Counsel has simply been negligent and did not calendar the due date for the brief when the Clerk’s Record was filed September 9, 2015. Counsel is presently working on an appellate brief in U.S.A. v. Pina, Appeal No. 15-50792 in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals which is due November 1, 2015. Counsel will begin Appellant’s brief immediately thereafter.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, undersigned counsel requests ACCEPTED 03-15-00539-CR 7598081 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/29/2015 12:40:56 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKthat this Court grant an extension through November 9, 2015, for the filing of Appellant's brief herein.

Respectfully submitted, /s/ John A. Kuchera John A. Kuchera 210 N. 6th St. Waco, Texas 76701 (254) 754-3075 (254) 756-2193 (facsimile) SBN 00792137 johnkuchera@210law.com

Attorney for Appellant

Certificate of Service I certify that on the 29th day of October, 2015, I mailed the foregoing to: Mr. Bob D. Odom Assistant District Attorney P.O. Box 540 Belton, TX 76513

/s/ John A. Kuchera John A. Kuchera
#### Stephanie G. PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gerald H. ITKIN; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 00-35158, 00-35695.

D.C. No. CV-99-00671.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2001. *

Decided June 1, 2001.

Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument and denies Pierce’s motion for oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated appeals, Stephanie G. Pierce appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing her action alleging that the defendants engaged in fraud and perjury in a prior civil suit, and the district court’s subsequent award of sanctions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court properly construed Pierce’s complaint as a motion for relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(3), and exercised removal jurisdiction. *See Eyak Native Village v. Exxon Corp.,*25 F.3d 773, 778 *608(9th Cir.1994). We review for abuse of discretion a motion to reconsider or reopen under Rule 60(b) and the entry of sanctions under 28 U.S.C. § 1927. *De Saracho v. Custom Food Mach., Inc.,*206 F.3d 874, 880 (9th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. —, 121 S.Ct. 183, 148 L.Ed.2d 126 (2000); *Wages v. IRS,*915 F.2d 1230, 1236 (9th Cir.1990).

In appeal No. 00-35158, we affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in the district court’s order filed January 14, 2000.

In appeal No. 00-35695, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees and costs as a sanction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927. *See Wages,*915 F.2d at 1236.

Pierce’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
2021 NIST Precision Measurement Grants

Dr. Andrew Jayich, University of California, Santa Barbara

Quantum logic spectroscopy with Ra+

Heavy radioactive atoms that belong to Period 7 (lowest row) in the periodic table of chemical 

elements have subtle features arising from their complex electronic structure in the ultra-relativistic 

regime. Of particular interest are a handful of isotopes, such as radium and some actinides, that are 

highly deformed octupoles, providing a collective enhancement in sensitivity to search for violation 

of time-reversal symmetry—which would indicate new physics beyond the Standard Model of 

particle physics. Although challenging, this sensitivity can be further enhanced by including the 

nuclei in a molecule to exploit its large and controllable internal electric fields. It is therefore 

desirable to study, and ultimately control, molecules that include heavy elements from Period 7 in

the table of chemical elements. However, highly efficient methods are necessary for working with 

radioactive atoms.

We propose developing radium quantum logic spectroscopy, where a single radium ion will be 

trapped and use to control and readout the state of a single radioactive molecule. Radium is a 

natural logic ion choice for work with other super-heavy elements, as the similarity in mass eases 

requirements on all quantum logic operations. RaH+ is a favorable first radioactive molecule to 

study, as it can be readily produced with trapped radium ions and it has large rotational constants, 

which reduces the thermal distribution of states over which the molecule is initially spread. In

addition to our prior work with Ra+, the proposed work is strongly supported by NIST’s recent first 

quantum logic spectroscopy of a molecule: CaH+ using Ca+ as the logic ion. This technique will 

both allow us to determine the quantum state of the molecule, and with that information transfer the 

molecule to a targeted state, providing the highest possible control over a radioactive molecule.

Dr. Jeroen Koelemeij, Vrije University Amsterdam, Stichting VU

Hyperfine spectroscopy of trapped HD+ molecular ions for improved value of mp/me

We propose radiofrequency (rf) spectroscopy of the hyperfine structure (hfs) of the deuterated 

hydrogen molecular ion HD+. The results will be combined with existing data obtained in our 

laboratory from laser vibrational spectroscopy of HD+, which recently led to a new determination 

of the proton-electron mass ratio witch a relative uncertainty of 21 ppt [Patra et al., Science 369, 

1238 (2020)]. The new rf data will enable an independent test of theoretical (QED) calculations of 

the HD+ hfs, and allow verification and reduction (by a factor of three) of the uncertainty of the 

vibrational data, thus providing a more precise HD+-based input datum for the anticipated 2022 

CODATA adjustment of physical constants. The project may also help resolve two recent >4σ

discrepancies between the theoretical and experimental hfs of HD+ and muonic deuterium, which 

might point to ununderstood behavior of the deuteron or flaws in the underlying QED theory.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,136
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,355
<PP&E>                                          45,357
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,281,543
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    786,000
<COMMON>                                        11,201
<OTHER-SE>                                  (2,041,742)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,002
<SALES>                                        785,970
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               786,970
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,364,499
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             751,479
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,329,008)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,329,008)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,226,243
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,102,765)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.19)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2.   CERTIFICATION   I, S. E. Parks, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report of Questar Gas Company on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007.  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   March 11, 2008 /s/S. E. Parks S. E. Parks Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40740 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ADRIAN GALVAN-GALLEGOS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-01-CR-78-1

- - - - - - - - - - April 11, 2002 Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *The Federal Public Defender representing Adrian GalvanGallegos (Galvan) has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Galvan has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350

                  In connection with the filing with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission of BBJ Environmental Technologies, Inc.'s
(the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2003 (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Executive Chairman, acting Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies in my capacity as an officer
of the Company, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of ss.13(a) or
                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                  The above certification is given as of the date of the Report
         and is limited to the periods covered by the Report.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this
         Certificate on August 14, 2003.





                              By: /s/ Robert G. Baker
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  Robert G. Baker, Executive Chairman, acting
                                     Chief Executive Officer




         A signed original or this written statement required by Section 906 has
         been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
         furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission of its staff upon
         request.
|   | 3) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |                                       |                                                  |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |                                       |
| Dated: August              13, 2007 |                                  | /s/ LOWELL              W.              GIFFHORN |
|                                     | Lowell W. Giffhorn Chief Financial Officer |

----