alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
October 15, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GIOVANNY LAGUAN, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00408-CV V.

R.D. PARIKH, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on May 12, 2015. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Giovanny Laguan.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-42,327-24

IN RE CARLTON STROUD, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 1997-CR-3770 IN THE 290TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus under this

Court’s original jurisdiction. He contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in

Bexar County and his application has not been properly forwarded to this Court.

Respondent, the District Clerk of Bexar County, shall forward Relator’s habeas application

to this Court, respond that Relator has not filed a habeas application in Bexar County, forward a copy

of an order designating issues together with correspondence documenting the date the State received

Relator’s habeas application, or forward a copy of an order establishing new deadlines in accordance

with this Court's emergency orders regarding the COVID-19 State of Disaster. See TEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(c)and (d); TEX.R.APP.P.73.4(b)(5);First EmergencyOrderRegarding
2

the Covid-19 State of Disaster, No. 20-9042 (Tex. Mar. 13, 2020); No. 20-007 (Tex. Crim. App.

Mar. 13, 2020); Third Emergency Order Regarding the Covid-19 Disaster, No. 20-9044 (Tex. Mar.

19, 2020); No. 20-008 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 19, 2020); Eighteenth Emergency Order Relating to

the Covid-19 Disaster, No. 20-9080 (Tex. Jun. 29, 2020). This motion for leave to file will be held. 

Respondent shall comply with this order within thirty days from the date of this order.

Filed: September 30, 2020

Do not publish
EXHIBIT
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Amendment to the Quarterly Report of Magnitude Information
      Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
      2008
      (the "Form 10-Q"), I, Edward Marney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
      of
      my **** knowledge,
      that the Company's Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Form 10-Q, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
                May 21, 2008
            /s/
                Edward MarneyEdward
                MarneyPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CMC
SECURITIES CORPORATION IV'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,474,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               38
<BONDS>                                      1,474,020
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,474,200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,778
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    18
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (56)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (56)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (56)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 24, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129257 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129257 

 COA: 259872 

Genesee CC: 03-012078 

RYAN WILLIAM OLSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Genesee Circuit Court for 

resentencing. The circuit court determined that the defendant’s sentencing guidelines 

were misscored and that the applicable guidelines range was lower than the one within 

which the defendant was originally sentenced. Under these circumstances, resentencing 

is required. People v Francisco (Docket No. 129035), 474 Mich ___ (2006). On 

remand, the court shall sentence defendant within the appropriate sentencing guidelines 

range, or articulate on the record a substantial and compelling reason for departing from 

the sentencing guidelines range in accordance with People v Babcock, 469 Mich 247 

(2003). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

WEAVER, J., dissents and states as follows: 

For the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion that I joined in People v 

Francisco (Docket No. 129035), 474 Mich ___ (2006), I would deny leave to appeal 

rather than remand for resentencing. 

d0517 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 24, 2006 

Clerk
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 23
- 00434
- CR

Zachary Alexander Woods , Appellant

v. The State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2022
- 095 , THE HONORABLE DANIEL H. MILLS , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant Zachary Alexander Woods was convicted by a jury of aggravated kidnapping. See Tex. Penal Code § 20.04(a)(4)

– (5). Appellant pleaded true to five prior felony convictions, and, pursuant to the Penal Code’s habitual offender provision, the jury assessed his punishment at life imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. See id. § 12.42(c)(1). The trial court sentenced appellant to the assessed punishment. Appellant’s court

- appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);
Garner v. State , 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 81

– 82 (1988). Appellant’s counsel has also forwarded to t his Court a copy of a2 letter that he sent to appellant, in which counsel asserted that he sent copies of the motion and brief to appellant; informed him of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se
response ; and provided him with a motion to assist him in obtaining the record. See Kelly

v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders , 386 U.S. at 744. To date, no pro se response has been filed. We have conducted an independent review of the record , including the record of the trial and sentencing proceedings below and appellate counsel’s brief, and find no reversible

error. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744; Garner , 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824 , 826

– 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review, and the appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The trial court’s judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________ Rosa Lopez Theofanis , Justice Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Smith and Theofanis Affirmed Filed: July 31, 2024 Do Not Publish
MODIFICATION AGREEMENT

      AGREEMENT entered into this 20th day of September, 2005 by and between
Walker Financial Corporation, a Delaware corporation having an address at 990
Stewart Avenue, Garden City, New York 11530 (hereinafter "Company") and Cindy
Dolgin, having an address at 3 Jordan Drive, Great Neck, N.Y. 11021 (hereinafter
"Lender").

      WHEREAS, Lender lent the Company Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($
250,000.00) pursuant to those certain agreement of promissory notes dated May
22, 2004 and August 4, 2004 (hereinafter the "Promissory Notes");

      WHEREAS, said Promissory Notes are due and payable:

      WHEREAS, Lender was issued 175,000 Common Stock Purchase Warrants in
connection with said loans currently carrying an exercise price of $ .45;

      WHEREAS, it is the desire of both the Company and Lender to extend the
maturity dates of said Notes and reduce the conversion price of the above
referenced Common Stock Purchase Warrants in connection with Lender lending the
Company an additional $ 125,000.00;

      IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained
and agreements of the parties herein contained and for other good and valuable
consideration including five dollars, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby covenant and agree as follows:

      The maturity date of that certain Promissory Note between Lender and the
Company dated May 22, 2004 and August 5, 2004 are hereby extended to a maturity
date of May 15, 2006 ( the "Maturity Date") with all accrued and unpaid interest
to be payable on the Maturity Date with principal payments required as follows:

                     January 15, 2006:              $ 30,000.00
                     February 15, 2006:               40,000.00
                     March 15, 2006:                  50,000.00
                     April 15, 2006:                  60,000.00
                     May 15, 2006:                    70,000.00

All other provisions of said Promissory Note remain in full force and effect.
Additionally the conversion price of the Common Stock Purchase Warrants in that
Warrant Certificate

<PAGE>

dated May 22, 2004 and the Warrant Certificate dated August 5, 2004 as modified
by the Modification Agreement between the parties dated August 5, 2004 between
Lender and the Company is hereby decreased from $ .45 to $ .30 and a new warrant
certificate shall be issued for an additional 17,500 warrants to acquire the
Company's common stock carrying an exercise price of $ .30. All other provisions
of said Common Stock Purchase Warrant remain in full force and effect.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have set their hands and seals as of the
date and year first above written.


Cindy Dolgin


-------------------------------


Walker Financial Corporation


By
  -----------------------------
#### LYON METAL PRODUCTS, Inc. v. AERO METALCRAFT CORP.

Civ. No. 159-49.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

May 25, 1951.

■ Whittemore, Porter & Follis, Elizabeth, N. J., for plaintiff.

Milton M. Unger and Adrian M. Unger, Newark, N. J., for trustee.

SMITH, District Judge.

This action having been opened to the Court on the motion of the plaintiff for the entry of a final judgment in conformity with the prayers for relief contained in the complaint, the answer filed by the defendants having been heretofore stricken on August 7, 1950; and the Court having decided that in the interest of justice an interlocutory decree rather than a final judgment should be entered at this time; and,

The Court having duly considered the allegations of the complaint, no proofs having been submitted, and having found:

(1) The plaintiff is the owner of the patent in suit, to wit, Letters Patent No. 2,458,095, the inventions .disclosed therein, and the rights and privileges thereunder. The said patent covers “Seat Construction for Chairs.”

(2) The patent in suit is valid. This determination, however, is predicated solely upon the presumption of validity and is not to .be construed as a judicial determination of validity.

(3) The defendant Aero Metalcraft Corporation has infringed the patent in suit and has violated the rights of the plaintiff by the manufacture .and sale of chairs embodying the invention of the said patent.

(4) The plaintiff is entitled to the injunctive relief here sought. '

It Is, on this 25th day of May, 1951, Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that tbe defendants: Aero Metalcraft Corporation, its officers, including Ralph A. O’Neill, its agents, servants and employees, and Barney Larkey, Esq., as Trustee for Aero Metalcraft Corporation, and all persons in active concert or participation with the said defendants, be enjoined and restrained from further infringement of Letters Patent No. 2,458,095; and,

It Is Further Ordered that the said defendants, their agents, servants, employees, and all persons in active concert or participation with them, be enjoined and restrained from manufacturing, selling, offering or advertising for sale any chairs embodying the invention defined in the said Letters’Patent; and,

It Is Further Ordered that the entry of this decree shall be without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to apply to this Court for further and other relief consistent with the opinion filed herewith.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8
(File Nos. 333-125701, 333-104724 and 333-152732) and Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-129784, 333-114258,
333-134992 and 333-148069) of Mines Management, Inc. and to the incorporation by reference therein of our reports dated March 16, 2009 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting of Mines Management, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

/S/ TANNER LC


Salt
Lake City, Utah
March 16, 2009

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the
registration of 1,300,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value, of
SpectraLink Corporation authorized for issuance pursuant to the SpectraLink
Corporation Stock Option Plan and the SpectraLink Corporation Employee Stock
Purchase Plan of our report dated February 2, 1998, with respect to the
financial statements of SpectraLink Corporation included in its Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                       ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Denver, Colorado
July 9, 1998
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4569

AN ACT

To provide for the development of a national plan

purposes.pathogen Phytophthora ramorum, and for otherDeath, a tree disease caused by the fungus-likefor the control and management of Sudden Oak

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4569

AN ACT

To provide for the development of a national plan for the

control and management of Sudden Oak Death, a tree

disease caused by the fungus-like pathogen Phytophthora

ramorum, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4569 EH

1 SECTION 1. NATIONAL PLAN FOR CONTROL AND MANAGE2 MENT OF SUDDEN OAK DEATH.

3 (a) DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL PLAN.—Subject to

4 the availability of appropriated funds for this purpose, the

5 Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Animal Plant

6 and Health Inspection Service, shall develop a national

7 plan for the control and management of Sudden Oak

8 Death, a forest disease caused by the fungus-like pathogen

9 Phytophthora ramorum.

10 (b) PLAN ELEMENTS.—In developing the plan, the

11 Secretary shall specifically address the following:

12 (1) Information derived by the Department of

13 Agriculture from ongoing efforts to identify hosts of

14 Phytophthora ramorum and survey the extent to

15 which Sudden Oak Death exists in the United

16 States.

17 (2) Past and current efforts to understand the

18 risk posed by Phytophthora ramorum and the re19 sults of control and management efforts regarding

20 Sudden Oak Death, including efforts related to re21 search, control, quarantine, and hazardous fuel re22 duction.

23 (3) Such future efforts as the Secretary con24 siders necessary to control and manage Sudden Oak

25 Death, including cost estimates for the implementa26 tion of such efforts.
3

•HR 4569 EH

1 (c) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary shall develop the

2 plan in consultation with other Federal agencies that have

3 appropriate expertise regarding the control and manage4 ment of Sudden Oak Death.

5 (d) IMPLEMENTATION OF PLAN.—The Secretary

6 shall complete the plan and commence implementation as

7 soon as practicable after the date on which funds are first

8 appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria9 tions in subsection (e) to carry out this section.

10 (e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is

11 authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary such sums

12 as may be necessary to carry out this section.

Passed the House of Representatives October 5,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
United States Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

Oregon

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, and has demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope

(Rev.: September 2021)

Mass Echelon I

30 kg to 1 mg

50 lb to 0.001 lb

4 oz to 0.03125 oz

Mass Echelon II

1 kg to 1 mg

1000 lb

500 lb 

50 lb

Mass Echelon III

500 kg to 1 mg

5000 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Volume Gravimetric, I

5 gal 

Volume Transfer, II

1000 gal to 5 gal

Temperature III, IV

30 °C to 0.01 °C

2022 to 2023

____________________________________

Katrice Lippa, Chief

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

Effective Dates: 2022-02-01 to 2024-02-01
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our reports
and to all references to our firm included in or made part of the Registration
Statement on Form S-4 of Golden Sky Systems, Inc. of which this Exhibit forms a
part.

                                   /s/ BOLINGLER, SEGARS, GILBERT & MOSS, L.L.P.
                                   Certified Public Accountants

Lubbock, Texas
November 25, 1998
A PLAYBOOK FOR WORKFORCE FRAMEWORKS

The Challenge The Opportunity

Workforce frameworks provide employers, learners,

and training and education providers a common

language to describe the work of a particular domain

along with defining what workers need to know or be

able to do to complete that work. However, without a

consistent model for these workforce frameworks to

follow, they are at risk of being developed separately

and inconsistently, resulting in narrow adoption and

limited application. As organizations aim to improve

workforce efforts in and across various fields –

including cybersecurity, privacy, data sciences, and

artificial intelligence – the existence of a

standardized and agreed-upon framework model is

key towards ensuring both broad adoption and

effective use.

Knowledge

Tasks

Skills

A standardized workforce framework model can facilitate

harmonization for a range of workforce frameworks, both in

terms components and the process followed. The creation of a

framework playbook provides a template for other

organizations to use and serves as a reference resource

pointing to frameworks that have used the model for

comparison and sharing of leading practices. By implementing

core building blocks (Tasks, Knowledge and Skill Statements),

an approach described in the National Initiative for

Cybersecurity Education (NICE) Workforce Framework for

Cybersecurity (NICE Framework), the frameworks become

agile, flexible, interoperable, and modular. The building blocks

approach forms the start of a playbook that is further

supplemented by two additional resources: the Task,

Knowledge, and Skill (TKS) Statements Authoring Guide for

Workforce Frameworks (a joint effort with NICE and Privacy

Engineering Program at the National Institute of Standards and

Technology) and NISTIR 8355, NICE Framework Competencies,

which provides additional information regarding what

competencies are and how they can be used. These resources

provide a strong footing to the creation of a common

framework model that can help answer not only the why and

the what but the who and the how.

nclude the following elements:

(TKS) Statements

ndicators, Credentials

es, and Work Roles

opment and Stakeholder Engagement

NIST.GOV/NICE

NICE@NIST.GOV

@NISTCYBER

Future Vision

A Playbook for Workforce Frameworks would i

Model Framework Structure

Building Blocks: Task, Knowledge, and Skill

Sample Uses: Competencies, Work Roles, Teams

Optional Components: Proficiency Levels, Capability I

Guidance on How to Write TKS statements, Competenci

A Workforce Framework Template

Effective Practices for Workforce Framework Devel