alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CAPITAL
GROWTH, INC. SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,011
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,011
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,439
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (77,428)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,011
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,014)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,114)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,114)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)
        

</TABLE>
As of January 2024

PROMOTE CAREER DISCOVERY WORKING GROUP

2024 MEETING SCHEDULE

Meeting times will take place the third Wednesday of every month at 3:30PM 

Eastern Time to serve members from different time zones. 

January 17, 2024 Weds.

February 21, 2024 Weds.

March 20, 2024 Weds.

April 17, 2024 Weds.

May 15, 2024 Weds.

June Meet at NICE conference if attending.

July 17, 2024 Weds.

August 21, 2024 Weds.

September 18, 2024 Weds.

October 16, 2024 Weds. (Webinar for CCW)

November 20, 2024 Weds.

December Meet at NICE conference if attending.

All meetings will be held through Microsoft Teams, unless otherwise indicated. 

If you are a new member, please add a meeting hold to your calendar for each 

meeting. New members will receive the official calendar invite from the NICE 

Program Office one week prior to the meeting date.
11106.

#### Marietta Mining Company *v.*Armstrong.

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under repeated rulings of this court an assignment, of error upon the refusal of the court to award a nonsuit will hot be considered where the case proceeded to a verdict, and the defendant excepted to the overruling of the motion for a new trial, which included the ground that the verdict in favor of the plaintiff was contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it.

2. “Where one wrongfully takes the personal property of another and converts the same to his own use in some other manner than by a sale, and does not receive any money therefor, the owner has a right of action ex delicto against such wrongdoer, and is restricted to this form of action. In such a case the tort can not be waived and an action ex contractu be brought, for the reason that, until the wrongdoer has received money to which the owner of the property is entitled, there can be no action for money had and received or upon an implied promise to pay money. *Spencer*v. *Hewitt,*20 *Ga.*426; *Barlow*v. *Statworth,*27 *Ga.*517. See also *Reynolds*v. *Padgett,*94 *Ga.*347 (21 S. E. 570); 40 Am. Law Reg. N. S. 50 et seq.” *Cragg*v. *Arendale,*113 *Ga.*181 (4) (38 S. E. 399). See also *Woodruff*v. *Zaban,*133 *Ga.*24 (65 S. E. 123, 134 Am. St. R. 186, 17 Ann. Cas. 974), and *Southern Ry. Co.*v. *Roberson,*136 *Ga.*146 (71 S. E. 129).

*(a)*The instant case was “an action of debt upon account,” and when the above principle of law is applied to its facts the verdict in favor of the *24plaintiff was contrary to law and the evidence, and the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial.

Decided March 3, 1920.

Appeal; from Cobb sujierior court — Judge Morris. October 6, 1919.

*J. Z. Foster,*for plaintiff in error.

*H. B. Moss,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
Order entered January 2 7, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 20 - 00055 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF S .B. & S.B., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Cour t

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JC - 12 - 1096 - X



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s January 15, 2020 motion to extend time for filing her notice of appeal. We GRANT the motion and deem the notice of appeal filed January 9, 2020 timely for ju risdictional purposes.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
Exhibit
32(b)






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Alltel Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sharilyn
S. Gasaway, Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:








(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Sharilyn S.
Gasaway


Sharilyn
S. Gasaway


Executive
Vice President - Chief Financial Officer


June 16,
2008






































A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Alltel Corporation and will be retained by Alltel Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

        Subsidiaries of Protection One Acquisition Holding Corporation


1.      P-1 Merger Sub., Inc., a Delaware corporation.

2.      P-2 Merger Sub., Inc., a Massachusetts corporation.
| 1)   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |                                                                                   |                                     |
|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
| Dated: August              14, 2006 |                                                                                   | /s/ WILLIAM              P. SPENCER |
|                                     | William                P. Spencer Chief                Executive Officer and President |

----
<PAGE>





                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


         I, Patrick Freeman, Chief Executive Officer of Cordia Corporation (the
"Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period March 31, 2003 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


                                         By: Patrick Freeman
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Patrick Freeman
                                             Chief Executive Officer

May 15, 2003



--------------
*    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
     been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia
     Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its
     staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.2(b)


   Schedule of Secured Convertible Note (refinancings after October 31, 2005)
        Issued by NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind on December 7, 2005


      Issue Date        Due Date          Principal        Conversion Price
      ----------        --------         -----------       ----------------
       12/07/05         06/07/06         $959,383.98    Greater of: (i) $0.0052;
                                                        or (ii) the par value of
                                                        NCT Group, Inc.
                                                        common stock on the
                                                        date of conversion
Exhibit 10.1


 


Summary of Board of Director Compensation Effective January 1,
2006


 


Annual
retainer of $50,000;


 


Meeting fees of $2,000/meeting;


 


Meeting fees of
$1,500/committee meeting or $3,000/committee meeting for Committee Chairmen;


 


Award of 5,000 shares of
restricted Class A common stock upon initial election to the Board of
Directors;


 


After initial election, annual
formula-based award of 1,500 shares of restricted stock and an additional
discretionary, non-formula based award of 2,000 shares (6,000 shares for the
Chairman of the Board) of restricted stock to be awarded the first trading day
of January each year;


 


Reimbursement for travel and
lodging expenses incurred in attending meetings;


 


Eligibility to participate in
the Company’s group health insurance plan, a portion of the premiums for which
are paid by the Company; and


 


Ability to convert annual cash
compensation into restricted stock under the Company’s 1998 Non-Employee
Director Stock Award Plan, as amended and restated.  The number of shares of restricted stock
granted is determined based on the closing market price of the Company’s Class A
common stock as of the grant date.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MEDUSA
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES' STATEMENT OF INCOME AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000064674
<NAME> MEDUSA CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           25045
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    29881
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1173
<INVENTORY>                                      31177
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 89420
<PP&E>                                          376186
<DEPRECIATION>                                  250457
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  223446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            34605
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      153969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    223446
<SALES>                                         323377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                323377
<CGS>                                           200999
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   241798
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1300)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3674
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  79205
<INCOME-TAX>                                     24945
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              54260
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1770)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     52490
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.07
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices 

# Order

September 18, 2009

136988 (57)

_____________ _______________ _______________

In re SKYLER LERO Y MCBRIDE, ALEXANDER GARAND MCBRIDE, and SAWYER DALE MCBRIDE, Minors.

_____________ _______________ _______________
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 136988 COA: 282062 Bay CC Family Division: RONALD D. MCBRIDE, JR., 06-009381-NA Respondent-Appellant, and

SUSAN MCBRIDE, Respondent.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s June 23, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

C ORRIGAN , J. ( dissenting ).

I would grant the respondent father’s motion for rehearing and grant leave to appeal for the reasons I expressed in my dissent to the order denying his original application for l eave to appeal. In re McBride, 483 Mich 1095 (2009 ). Respondent and the Attorney General argued that respondent’s parental rights were wrongly terminated because the trial court deprived him of his rights to counsel a nd to participate in this case

from the outset while he was in prison. Further, these erro rs arguably were not harmless because, had counsel been appo inted, counsel may have esta blished a guardianship with respondent’s sister, who requested custody from the court; such a guardianship could have averted the termination of responde nt’s parental rights and permitted him to continue his relationships with his three adolescent sons. Mo st significantly , in the wordsI, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 18, 2009

0915 2

of respondent’s pro per motion for rehearing, the conclusi on of the Court of Appeals that the complete denial of his right to counsel was harmless gives trial courts a “green light to violate parents[’] rights whenever they fe el the need” because ju dges “will know that the courts will deny relief for those who appeal in the future.” A pare nt’s right to counsel during termination proceedings has thus been reduced to a right to counsel when an appellate court, in hindsight and without the benef it of any developed record in favor of the unrepresented parent, thinks that counsel might have made a difference.

K ELLY , C.J., joins the statement of C ORRIGAN , J.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000393 03-OCT-2016 08:16 AM
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 4, 2018

No. 04-18-00060-CV

IN RE ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On February 2, 2018, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The real party in interest 

and respondent declined to file a response. After reviewing the petition, we conclude relator is 

entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, the writ of mandamus is CONDITIONALLY 

GRANTED. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(c).

The Honorable David J. Rodriguez is ORDERED to, within fifteen days, amend in a 

manner consistent with this court’s opinion his ruling in decretal paragraphs 2A and 13A of the 

January 19, 2018 “Order on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel.” The writ of mandamus will issue only 

if we are notified that Judge Rodriguez has not complied within fifteen days from the date of this 

order.

It is so ORDERED on April 4, 2018.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of April, 2018.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017CV04875, styled Brian A. Jones v. Allstate Insurance Company, 

pending in the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David J. Rodriguez presiding.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Rose Frawert, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Mid-State
Raceway, Inc. and Subsidiary (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2000 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 10, 2004
/s/ Rose Frawert
Rose Frawert
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
                                                                              51
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4807

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Rio Vista, California, as the ‘‘Adam G. Kinser al Service located at 140 Sacramento Street in

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4807

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 140 Sacramento Street in Rio Vista, California, as the ‘‘Adam G. Kinser Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4807 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 140 Sacramento Street in Rio Vista, California,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Adam G. Kinser

5 Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Adam G. Kinser Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 6,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 4.23


 


Deed of
settlement and release and deed of indemnity (April 2004) – 

Mr Richard E McKinnon


 


The deed of settlement and release and deed of
indemnity (April 2004) of Mr Richard E McKinnon is incorporated by
reference to National Australia Bank Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Commission
on January 20, 2005
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

THE GOKANA TRUST, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-4661

)

ASHLEY KOZEL, et al., )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed March 16, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota 

County; Nancy Donnellan, Senior Judge.

Jesse Dean-Kluger of Jesse Dean-Kluger, 

P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Steven L. Brannock, Philip J. Padovano 

and Joseph T. Eagleton of Brannock & 

Humphries, Tampa; Jeffrey D. Fisher and 

Zachary R. Potter of Fisher, Bendeck & 

Potter, P.L., West Palm Beach, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KELLY, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Modern Controls, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-27730, 33-42255 and 33-49752) on Form S-8 of Modern Controls, Inc. of our
reports dated February 9, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Modern Controls, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the
related consolidated statements of income and cash flows and related financial
statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 1995, which reports appear in or are incorporated by reference in the
December 31, 1995 annual report on Form 10-K of Modern Controls, Inc.



                           /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP




Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 26, 1996
Dismissed and Mem orandum Opinion filed December 4 , 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00961

- CV

DIANNE CARROLL FITZP ATRICK , Appellant

V.

STATE FINANCIAL SERV ICES

— SPRINGLEAF, INC. D/B /A SPRINGLEAF FINANCIAL SERVICES O F TEXAS, INC. F/K /A AMERICAN GENERAL

FINANC IAL SERVICES OF TEXA S, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 65805



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an attempted appeal from a n order denying a temporary injunction sig ned
March 2 , 2012

. When permitted, appeals from interlocutory orders are accelerated. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.1. A notice of appeal in an accelerated appeal must be filed within twenty days after the order is signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b). Appellant ’ s notice of appeal was not filed until October 10, 2012, and is therefore untimely.2

On November 8, 2012, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). On
Nov ember 19, 2012, appellant filed a document entitled, “First Amended Notice of Appeal.” In the document, appellant, who is appearing pro se, argued the merits of her case, but she did not address this court’s jurisdiction.
A timely filed notice of app eal is required to invoke this court’ s jurisdiction. Tex.
R. App. P. 25.1(b). Because appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely, w e lack jurisdiction over this attempted interlocutory appeal

. W e order the appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Brown and Busby

.