alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 22, 2010 

s1115 

Order 

 

November 22, 2010 

141466 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141466 

 COA: 297404 

Oakland CC: 2008-219261-FH 

RONNIE WILLIAMS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 27, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Name Affiliation

John Foulke ATCC

Pamela Wood ATCC

Yvonne Reid ATCC

Lena Lee Beckman Coulter

Wen Bo Wang Cellular Dynamics International (CDI)

Chris Wiwi Celgene

Michelle McLaughlin Celgene

Matthew Riolo Chemometec

Robert Ulrey Children's National Medical Center - Lab of Dr. Patrick Hanley

Jeff Partridge Corning

Aletta Schnitzler EMD Millipore

Hany Demian FDA - Office of the Commissioner 

Heba Degheidy FDA, CBER, OTAT

Jaikumar Duraiswamy FDA, CBER, OTAT

Judith Arcidiacono FDA, CBER, OTAT

Mohammad Heidaran FDA, CBER, OTAT

Ramavati Pal FDA, CBER, OTAT

Steve Bauer FDA, CBER, OTAT

Jiwen Zhang GE Healthcare

Carolyn Yeago Georgia Institute of Technology

Kim Dede GSK

Michael Mendicino Hybrid Concepts International/Standards Coordinating Body (SCB)

Patrick R. Bartlow, Ph.D. Janssen R&D | PDMS

Joseph G. Finny Lonza

Gabrielle Cusimano Medimmune

Brigitte Senechal Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Jean Qiu Nexcelom Bioscience 

David Stroncek NIH, Cell Processing Section, DTM, Clinical Center

Jiaqiang Ren NIH, Cell Processing Section, DTM, Clinical Center

Aikebaier Aizihaier NIST

Akira Sasaki NIST

Clare Allocca NIST

John Elliott NIST

Lili Wang NIST

Michael Halter NIST

Sheng Lin-Gibson NIST

Sumona Sarkar NIST

Akos Simsik Novartis 

Marissa Nasshan Ovizio

Philip Mathuis Ovizio

Leakhena Som Precision Biosciences

Elise Gill RoosterBio Inc.

Mike OGrady ThermoFisher Scientific

Raphael Williams TissueGene, Inc.

Tracy Criswell Wake Forest Baptist Health

Crystal Kraft West Pharmaceutical Services

Participant List: NIST-FDA Cell Counting Workshop - Sharing practices in cell counting 

measurements
#### J. D. Caldwell *v.*G. W. Dohney.

Fraudulent Conveyances — Restitution of Purchase Money,

A person who purchased land of an insolvent was held not to. he guilty of such turpitude as to destroy his right to restitution of the money paid by him.

APPEAL FROM ADAIR CIRCUIT COURT.

September 4, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Hardin:

In the former opinion of this court in this case (7 Bush 217) it was held in substance that while the conveyance from Ingram to to the rights of Ingram’s creditors; it did not involve such turpi-to the rights of. Ingram’s creditors,, it did not involve such turpitude on the part of Caldwell as to forfeit his right to restitution of the $500, which as between him and' the creditors at least, sufficiently appear to have been paid; or the balance due him as on a rescission of the contract upon equitable principles and for such balance, if any should be found, he was entitled to a prior lien on the land.

The fact is not controverted that the appellee received the entire proceeds of the land conveyed to Caldwell, which was sold to enforce the attachment lien. The litigation authorized by the mandatory order of this court between the appellant and N. B. Dohney and wife did not affect the appellant’s right to the $500 from the party who received it; and the appellant was entitled to judgment for it on his rule against the appellee, unless his right *69to all or part of it was discharged by unequitable adjustment of accounts between him and Ingram, which does not appear.

*James, for appellant.*

*Garnett, Baker, for appellee.*

It results that the court erred in refusing to the appellant the relief sought by him for restitution and in discharging the rule.

Wherefore the judgment appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to render a judgment in conformity to this opinion.
exv10w1



 




Exhibit 10.1







Energy, Inc.


 

 


3182 Royal Lane | Dallas, Texas | 75229 | PH: 214-353-0606 | FX: 214-353-0607 | www.earthwise.cbiz



 

 



November 30, 2005




Mr. Tim Burroughs, President

TBX Resources, Inc.

Gulftex Operating, Inc.

3030 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1320

Dallas, Texas 75234




RE: Conditional Statement of Project Status




Dear Tim:




          This letter agreement (the “Agreement”) with our signature and your signature of acceptance
below will confirm that the parties; Earthwise Energy, Inc. (“EEI”), TBX Resources, Inc. (“TBX”),
and Gulftex Operating, Inc. (“Gulftex”) hereof have agreed, to enter into this Agreement and its
provisions as set forth below:




	1.	 	Funding. Prior to this Agreement EEI informed TBX and Gulftex of the formation of
Energy Partners International (“EPI”) as a Texas Joint Venture General Partnership with EEI
serving as its Managing Venturer. EEI and EPI confirm their agreement with Gulftex, as the
“Issuer” of a certain Texas Joint Venture General Partnership to be known as “Six Wells JV” or
other such name as the organizers thereof may select, to make an investment of $6,000,000 (six
million dollars) in said joint venture to be divided between six Barnett Shale wells to be
drilled in the geographic area of the Barnett Shale commonly known as the “Core Area” that are
expected to be drilled in 2006. Further, EEI and EPI hereby authorize Gulftex, as the
Managing Venture of the Six Wells JV, to enter into a binding subscription agreement with TBX
to transfer up to 50% of the membership interest in the Six Wells JV to TBX in exchange for
the proper amount of shares of the common stock of TBX at a conversion price of 3.75 per share
or a total of 800,000 shares. As such, TBX will effectively receive one half interest in the
joint venture which has $6,000,000 in capital which it intends to invest in the above
described wells in the Barnett Shale.
	 
	2.	 	Disclosure. It is understood by the parties that TBX is a public entity and that this
Agreement is a material agreement for the purposes of disclosure and that TBX will be required
to file an 8-K or similar filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission disclosing the
terms of this Agreement.
	 
	3.	 	Amendment. The parties hereto agree that the transactions herein contemplated and/or
agreed may be amended, changed, or modified by mutual written agreement of the parties.





Whereby we have set our hands as of the date first written above.




	 	 	 	 	 
	EARTHWISE ENERGY, INC.	 	TBX RESOURCES, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Steven C. Howard	 	/s/ Tim Burroughs
	 	 	 
	Steven C. Howard, President	 	Tim Burroughs, President
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Energy Partners International, a Texas Joint Venture	Gulftex Operating. Inc.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Steven C. Howard, President
	 	/s/ Tim Burroughs
	 

	 	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Earthwise Energy, Inc. Managing Venturer
	 	Tim Burroughs, President
EXHIBIT 23(ii)

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our reports dated October 24, 1996, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Milgray
Electronics, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30,
1996. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the
Registration Statements of Milgray Electronics, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No.
33-59986, effective March 24, 1993, and File No. 33-66652, effective July 29,
1993).


GRANT THORNTON LLP


Melville, New York
December 24, 1996
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY'S DECEMBER 31, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             200
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  789,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (52,000)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               755,600
<PP&E>                                       8,072,600
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,031,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,137,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          707,500
<BONDS>                                      1,094,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,721,800
<OTHER-SE>                                    (328,700)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,137,800
<SALES>                                              0<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,238,300
<CGS>                                                0<F3>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,244,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (9,400)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              85,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                918,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                   316,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            602,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   602,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>SECURITIES ARE NOT MATERIAL AND THEREFORE HAVE NOT BEEN STATED SEPARATELY
IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. THIS AMOUNT IS INCLUDED IN THE CASH TAG.
<F2>NET SALES OF TANGIBLE PRODUCTS IS NOT MORE THAN 10% OF TOTAL OPERATING
REVENUES AND THEREFORE HAS NOT BEEN STATED SEPARATELY IN THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS PURSUANT TO REGULATION S-X, RULE 5-03(B). THIS AMOUNT IS INCLUDED
IN THE "TOTAL REVENUES" TAG.
<F3>COST OF TANGIBLE GOODS SOLD IS INCLUDED IN COST OF SERVICE AND PRODUCTS
IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE "TOTAL COST" TAG, PURSUANT TO
REGULATION S-X, RULE 5-03(B).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 4.3

                          CONSENT OF APPOINTED ACTUARIES

We consent to the inclusion in this Registration Statement on Form F-80 (the
"Registration Statement") of Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial
Services Inc. (the "Company") of our report dated February 3, 2005, relating
to our valuation of the policy liabilities of the Company for its
consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the
variation in the policy liabilities in its consolidated statements of income
for the years then ended, appearing in the Company's Annual Report for the
year ended December 31, 2004.

<Table>
<S>                                               <C>
/s/ Michel Sanschagrin                            /s/ Denis Ricard
Michel Sanschagrin                                Denis Ricard
Fellow of the Canadian Institute of Actuaries     Fellow of the Canadian Institute of Actuaries
(for the year ended December 31, 2003)            (for the year ended December 31, 2004)
</Table>

Quebec, November 18, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4453 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4453

    To improve access to physicians in medically underserved areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2004

 Mr. Moran of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To improve access to physicians in medically underserved areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Access to Rural Physicians 
Improvement Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF FOREIGN COUNTRY RESIDENCE REQUIREMENT WITH RESPECT TO 
              INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GRADUATES.

    (a) Extension of Deadline.--
            (1) In general.--Section 220(c) of the Immigration and 
        Nationality Technical Corrections Act of 1994 (8 U.S.C. 1182 
        note) (as amended by section 11018 of Public Law 107-273) is 
        amended by striking ``and before June 1, 2004.'' and inserting 
        ``and before the date that is 1 year after the date of the 
        enactment of the Access to Rural Physicians Improvement Act of 
        2004.''.
            (2) Effective dates.--
                    (A) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph 
                (B), the amendment made by paragraph (1) shall take 
                effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                    (B) Special effective date.--With respect only to 
                aliens admitted to the United States under section 
                101(a)(15)(J) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
                U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(J)), or acquiring status under such 
                section after admission, during the period beginning on 
                June 1, 2004, and ending on the date of the enactment 
                of this Act, the amendment made by paragraph (1) shall 
                take effect as if this Act were enacted on May 31, 
                2004.
    (b) Exemption From H1B Numerical Limitations.--
            (1) In general.--Section 214(l)(2)(A) of the Immigration 
        and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(1)(2)(A) is amended by 
        adding at the end the following:
``The numerical limitations contained in subsection (g)(1)(A) shall not 
apply to any alien whose status is changed under the preceding 
sentence, if the alien obtained a waiver of the 2-year foreign 
residence requirement upon a request by an interested State agency.''.
            (2) Effective date.--The amendment made by paragraph (1) 
        shall take effect as if this Act were enacted on September 30, 
        2003.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23




                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP






                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                    -----------------------------------------


As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference of our report dated February 11, 1999,  which is included in this Form
10-K  for the  year  ended  December  31,  1998,  into  United  Capital  Corp.'s
previously  filed  Registration  Statements,  File Numbers  33-28045,  33-65140,
333-28395 and 333-57873.




                                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Roseland, New Jersey
March 5, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 428 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 428

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the credit for 
               increasing research activities permanent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2003

Mr. Sensenbrenner introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the credit for 
               increasing research activities permanent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESEARCH CREDIT MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to credit for increasing research activities) is amended by 
striking subsection (h).
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Paragraph (1) of section 45C(b) of such 
Code is amended by striking subparagraph (D).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid or incurred after June 30, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 10(h)**

 

**SUMMARYDESCRIPTION OF TRUSTEES’ COMPENSATION**

** **

The compensation paid toeach Individual Trustee and the Corporate Trustee is set forth in the Amendmentto the Agreement of Trust dated as of October 25, 1982 (the “Amendment”).  The Amendment is filed as Exhibit 3(a) tothe Form 10-K.

 

Pursuant to the Amendment,each Individual Trustee receives at least $20,000 in annual compensation forservices as Trustee.  Each year, annualTrustee compensation is adjusted up or down (but not below $20,000) inaccordance with changes from the November 1981 level of 295.5 (the “1981Escalation Level”) in the All Commodities Producer Price Index (with 1967 = 100as a base).  The All Commodities ProducerPrice Index is published by the U.S. Department of Labor.  The adjustment is made at the end of eachfiscal year and is calculated on the basis of the proportion between (a) thelevel of such index for the November preceding the end of such fiscalyear, and (b) the 1981 Escalation Level. Each of the Individual Trustees that served the Trust for the entirefiscal year received $35,999 in cash compensation for services to the Trustduring the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010.  The Individual Trustees who did not serve foran entire fiscal year received a pro-rated portion of the $35,999.

 

Also pursuant to theAmendment, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the Corporate Trustee,receives annual compensation in an amount equal to the greater of (i) $20,000,or such other amount determined in accordance with the adjustments described inthe preceding paragraph, or (ii) one quarter of one percent (1/4 of 1%) ofthe Trust Moneys, exclusive of proceeds of sale of any part of the Trust Estate(as such terms are defined in the Agreement of Trust), received by the Trusteesand distributed to Trust Unitholders.

 

Additionally, each year the Corporate Trusteereceives $62,500 (or more, if unanimously approved by the Individual Trustees)to cover clerical and administrative services to Mesabi Trust other thanservices customarily performed by a registrar or transfer agent.  In fiscal 2010, the Trust paid the CorporateTrustee $62,500 to cover clerical and administrative services to Mesabi Trustand $9,974 for services as registrar and transfer agent.  The Corporate Trustee earned $98,063 in totalcompensation for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010.

 

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 99(b)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
     MAPCO Inc.:

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of MAPCO Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1997 (none of which are presented
herein). Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed at
Item 14(a)2 in the MAPCO Inc. 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K (not presented
herein). These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MAPCO Inc. and
subsidiaries at December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1997, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in
our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to
the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in
all material respects the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 16 to the MAPCO Inc. consolidated financial statements
(Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements of Williams Holdings of
Delaware, Inc.), MAPCO Inc. is a defendant in litigation relating to an LPG
explosion in April 1992, that occurred near an underground salt dome storage
facility located near Brenham, Texas.

Effective October 1, 1997, MAPCO Inc. changed its method of accounting for
business process reengineering activities to conform to the consensus reached 
by the Emerging Issues Task Force in Issue No. 97-13.





Deloitte & Touche LLP
Tulsa, Oklahoma
January 27, 1998
(March 3, 1998, as to Notes 2 and 16
to the MAPCO Inc. consolidated financial statements)




                                       53
Opinion issued May 12, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas

NO. 01-15-00109-CR

____________

MICHAEL WAYNE MCINTOSH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 56th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 13-CR-3003

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Michael Wayne McIntosh, has filed a motion to dismiss the 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). McIntosh has signed the motion to dismiss. 

We have not issued a decision in the appeal.
2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss 

any pending motions as moot.

We direct the Clerk to issue the mandate within 10 days of the date of this 

opinion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).