Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 236 / Tuesday, December 9, 2014 / Notices 73071 

IV. Test Data Received 

This unit contains the information 

required by TSCA section 4(d) for the 

test data received by EPA. 

A. Benzenediamine, ar,ar-diethyl-armethyl- (CAS No. 68479–98–1) 

1. Chemical Use(s): Processing 

reactant in the manufacture of 

adhesives, plastics and resins; paint and 

coatings; and synthetic rubber materials. 

2. Applicable Test Rule: Chemical 

testing requirements for second group of 

high production volume chemicals 

(HPV2), 40 CFR 799.5087. 

3. Test Data Received: The following 

listing describes the nature of the test 

data received. The test data will be 

added to the docket for the applicable 

TSCA section 4 test rule and can be 

found by referencing the docket ID 

number provided. EPA reviews of the 

health effects test data will be added to 

the same docket upon completion. 

• Repeated Dose Toxicity Study, oral. 

The docket ID number assigned to this 

data is EPA–HQ–OPPT–2007–0531. 

B. 2-Oxiranemethanamine, N-[4-(2- 

oxiranylmethoxy)phenyl]-N-(2- 

oxiranylmethyl)- (CAS No. 5026– 

74–4) 

1. Chemical Use(s): Resin and 

synthetic rubber manufacturing; and 

aerospace and parts manufacturing. 

2. Applicable Test Rule: Chemical 

testing requirements for third group of 

high production volume chemicals 

(HPV3), 40 CFR 799.5089. 

3. Test Data Received: The following 

listing describes the nature of the test 

data received. The test data will be 

added to the docket for the applicable 

TSCA section 4 test rule and can be 

found by referencing the docket ID 

number provided. EPA reviews of the 

health effects test data will be added to 

the same docket upon completion. 

• Repeated Dose Toxicity Study, oral. 

The docket ID number assigned to this 

data is EPA–HQ–OPPT–2009–0112. 

C. Phenol, 2,4-bis(1-methyl-1- 

phenylethyl)-6-[2-(2- 

nitrophenyl)diazenyl]- (CAS No. 

70693–50–4) 

1. Chemical Use(s): UV absorber or 

light stabilizer for plastics. 

2. Applicable Test Rule: Chemical 

testing requirements for third group of 

high production volume chemicals 

(HPV3), 40 CFR 799.5089. 

3. Test Data Received: The following 

listing describes the nature of the test 

data received. The test data will be 

added to the docket for the applicable 

TSCA section 4 test rule and can be 

found by referencing the docket ID 

numbers provided. EPA reviews of the 

health effects test data will be added to 

the same docket upon completion. 

• Acute Toxicity Study, oral. The 

docket ID number assigned to this data 

is EPA–HQ–OPPT–2009–0112. 

• Genetic Toxicity Study, in vitro. 

The docket ID number assigned to this 

data is EPA–HQ–OPPT–2009–0112. 

• Genetic Toxicity Study, in vivo. The 

docket ID number assigned to this data 

is EPA–HQ–OPPT–2009–0112. 

• Repeated Dose Toxicity Study in 

Rats. The docket ID number assigned to 

this data is EPA–HQ–OPPT–2009–0112. 

• Developmental Toxicity Study in 

Rats. The docket ID number assigned to 

this data is EPA–HQ–OPPT–2009–0112. 

• Developmental Toxicity/

Teratogenicity Study. The docket ID 

number assigned to this data is EPA– 

HQ–OPPT–2009–0112. 

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq. 

Dated: December 1, 2014. 

Maria J. Doa, 

Director, Chemical Control Division, Office 

of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28821 Filed 12–8–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9920–25–Region 6] 

Underground Injection Control 

Program; Hazardous Waste Injection 

Restrictions; Reissuance of a Petition 

for Exemption—Class I Hazardous 

Waste Injection; Pergan Marshall, LLC 

Marshall, TX 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of a final decision on a 

no migration petition reissuance. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

reissuance of an exemption to the land 

disposal Restrictions, under the 1984 

Hazardous and Solid Waste 

Amendments to the Resource 

Conservation and Recovery Act, has 

been denied to Pergan Marshall, LLC for 

two Class I injection wells located at 

Marshall, TX. The company was unable 

to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the 

Environmental Protection Agency by the 

petition reissuance application and 

supporting documentation that, to a 

reasonable degree of certainty, there 

would be no migration of hazardous 

constituents from the injection zone for 

as long as the waste remains hazardous. 

This final decision prohibits the 

underground injection by Pergan, of 

restricted hazardous wastes, into Class I 

hazardous waste injection wells WDW– 

180 and WDW–243. A public notice was 

issued October 2, 2014. The public 

comment period closed on November 

18, 2014. No comments were received. 

This decision constitutes final Agency 

action and there is no Administrative 

appeal. This decision may be reviewed/ 

appealed in compliance with the 

Administrative Procedure Act. 

DATES: This action is effective as of 

November 24, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of the petition 

reissuance and all pertinent information 

relating thereto are on file at the 

following location: Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 6, Water 

Quality Protection Division, Source 

Water Protection Branch (6WQ–S), 1445 

Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Philip Dellinger, Chief Ground Water/

UIC Section, EPA—Region 6, telephone 

(214) 665–8324. 

Dated: November 24, 2014. 

William K. Honker, 

Director, Water Quality Protection Division. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28810 Filed 12–8–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Information Collection 

Revision; Comment Request (3064– 

0189) 

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation (FDIC). 

ACTION: Notice of information collection 

to be submitted to OMB for review and 

approval under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act, and request for 

comment. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Deposit 

Insurance Corporation (FDIC) invites the 

general public and other Federal 

agencies to take this opportunity to 

comment on a revision of a continuing 

information collection, as required by 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a respondent is not 

required to respond to, an information 

collection unless it displays a currently 

valid Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) control number. The FDIC is 

soliciting comment concerning its 

information collection titled, ‘‘Annual 

Stress Test Reporting Template and 

Documentation for Covered Banks with 

Total Consolidated Assets of $10 Billion 

to $50 Billion under Dodd-Frank’’ (OMB 

Control No. 3064–0189). 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

January 8, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit written 

comments by any of the following 

methods: 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
73072 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 236 / Tuesday, December 9, 2014 / Notices 

1Public Law 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376 (July 21, 

2010). 

2 12 U.S.C. 5365(i)(2)(A). 

3 12 U.S.C. 5301(12). 

4 12 U.S.C. 5365(i)(2)(C). 

5 12 U.S.C. 5365(i)(2)(B). 

6 77 FR 62417 (October 15, 2012). 

7See 78 FR 16263 (March 14, 2013) and 78 FR 

63470 (October 24, 2013). 

• Agency Web site: http:// 

www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/federal/. 

Follow the instructions for submitting 

comments on the FDIC Web site. 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Email: Comments@FDIC.gov. 

Include ‘‘Annual Stress Test Reporting’’ 

on the subject line of the message. 

• Mail: Gary A. Kuiper, Counsel, or 

John Popeo, Counsel, Legal Division, 

MB–3098, Attention: Comments, FDIC, 

550 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 

20429. 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Guard 

station at the rear of the 550 17th Street 

Building (located on F Street) on 

business days between 7:00 a.m. and 

5:00 p.m. 

Public Inspection: All comments 

received will be posted without change 

to http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/ 

federal/ including any personal 

information provided. 

Additionally, you may send a copy of 

your comments: By mail to the U.S. 

OMB, 725 17th Street NW., #10235, 

Washington, DC 20503 or by facsimile 

to 202.395.6974, Attention: Federal 

Banking Agency Desk Officer. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You 

can request additional information from 

Gary Kuiper, 202.898.3877, or John 

Popeo, 202.898.6923, Legal Division, 

FDIC, 550 17th Street NW., MB–3098, 

Washington, DC 20429. In addition, 

copies of the templates referenced in 

this notice can be found on the FDIC’s 

Web site (http://www.fdic.gov/ 

regulations/laws/federal/). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FDIC 

is requesting comment on the following 

revision of an information collection: 

Annual Stress Test Reporting Template 

and Documentation for Covered Banks 

With Total Consolidated Assets of $10 

Billion to $50 Billion Under DoddFrank 

Section 165(i)(2) of the Dodd-Frank 

Wall Street Reform and Consumer 

Protection Act 1 (Dodd-Frank Act) 

requires certain financial companies, 

including state nonmember banks and 

state savings associations, to conduct 

annual stress tests 2 and requires the 

primary financial regulatory agency 3 of 

those financial companies to issue 

regulations implementing the stress test 

requirements.4 A state nonmember bank 

or state savings association is a ‘‘covered 

bank’’ and therefore subject to the stress 

test requirements if its total 

consolidated assets exceed $10 billion. 

Under section 165(i)(2), a covered bank 

is required to submit to the Board of 

Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System (Board) and to its primary 

financial regulatory agency a report at 

such time, in such form, and containing 

such information as the primary 

financial regulatory agency may 

require.5 On October 15, 2012, the FDIC 

published in the Federal Register a final 

rule implementing the section 165(i)(2) 

annual stress test requirement.6 The 

final rule requires covered banks to 

meet specific reporting requirements 

under section 165(i)(2). In 2013, the 

FDIC first implemented the reporting 

templates for covered banks with total 

consolidated assets of $10 billion to $50 

billion and provided instructions for 

completing the reports.7 This 

information collection notice describes 

revisions by the FDIC to those reporting 

templates and related instructions as 

well as required information. The 

information contained in these 

information collections may be given 

confidential treatment to the extent 

allowed by law. (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)). 

Consistent with past practice, the 

FDIC intends to use the data collected 

through these revised templates to 

assess the reasonableness of the stress 

test results of covered banks and to 

provide forward-looking information to 

the FDIC regarding a covered bank’s 

capital adequacy. The FDIC also may 

use the results of the stress tests to 

determine whether additional analytical 

techniques and exercises could be 

appropriate to identify, measure, and 

monitor risks at the covered bank. The 

stress test results are expected to 

support ongoing improvement in a 

covered bank’s stress testing practices 

with respect to its internal assessments 

of capital adequacy and overall capital 

planning. 

The FDIC recognizes that many 

covered banks with total consolidated 

assets of $10 billion to $50 billion are 

part of a holding company that is also 

required to submit relevant Dodd Frank 

Annual Stress Test (DFAST) reports to 

the Board (FR Y–16, OMB No. 7100– 

0356). The FDIC, Office of Comptroller 

of the Currency, and Board (collectively 

the ‘‘Agencies’’) have coordinated the 

preparation of stress testing templates in 

order to make the templates as similar 

as possible and thereby minimize the 

burden on affected institutions. These 

Agencies have coordinated in a similar 

manner regarding these proposed 

modifications to the stress testing 

templates. Therefore, the revisions by 

the FDIC to its reporting requirements 

will remain consistent with the 

modifications that the Board proposes to 

make to the FR Y–16. 

Description of Information Collection 

The FDIC DFAST 10–50 reporting 

form collects data through two primary 

schedules: (1) The Results Schedule 

(which includes the quantitative results 

of the stress tests under the baseline, 

adverse, and severely adverse scenarios 

for each quarter of the planning horizon) 

and (2) the Scenario Variables Schedule. 

In addition, respondents are required to 

submit a summary of the qualitative 

information supporting their 

quantitative projections. 

Results Schedule 

For each of the three supervisory 

scenarios (baseline, adverse, and 

severely adverse) each covered bank is 

required to report data on two 

supporting schedules: (1) The Income 

Statement Schedule and (2) the Balance 

Sheet Schedule. Therefore, two 

supporting schedules for each scenario 

(baseline, adverse, and severely adverse) 

are completed. In addition, the Results 

Schedule includes a Summary 

Schedule, which summarizes key 

results from the Income Statement and 

Balance Sheet Schedules. 

Income statement data is collected on 

a projected quarterly basis showing 

projections of revenues and losses. For 

example, respondents project net 

charge-offs by loan type (stratified by 

twelve specific loan types), gains and 

losses on securities, pre-provision net 

revenue, and other key components of 

net income (i.e., provision for loan and 

lease losses, taxes, etc.). 

Balance sheet data is collected on a 

quarterly basis for projections of certain 

assets, liabilities, and capital. Capital 

data is also collected on a projected 

quarterly basis and include components 

of regulatory capital, including the 

projections of risk weighted assets and 

capital actions such as common 

dividends and share repurchases. 

Scenario Variables Schedule 

To conduct the stress tests, an 

institution may choose to project 

additional economic and financial 

variables beyond the mandatory 

supervisory scenarios provided to 

estimate losses or revenues for some or 

all of its portfolios. In such cases, the 

institution would be required to 

complete the Scenario Variables 

Schedule for each scenario where the 

institution chooses to use additional 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 236 / Tuesday, December 9, 2014 / Notices 73073 

8 78 FR 55340 (September 10, 2013). 

9 79 FR 20754 (April 14, 2014). 

10 79 FR 47457 (August 13, 2014). 

variables. The Scenario Variables 

Schedule collects information on the 

additional scenario variables used over 

the planning horizon for each 

supervisory scenario. 

Revisions to Reporting Templates for 

Banks With $10 Billion to $50 Billion 

in Assets 

On July 9, 2013, the FDIC approved 

an interim final rule that will revise and 

replace the FDIC’s risk-based and 

leverage capital requirements to be 

consistent with agreements reached by 

the Basel Committee on Banking 

Supervision in ‘‘Basel III: A Global 

Regulatory Framework for More 

Resilient Banks and Banking Systems’’ 

(‘‘Basel III’’).8 The final rule was 

published in the Federal Register on 

April 14, 2014 (‘‘revised capital 

framework’’).9 The revisions include 

implementation of a new definition of 

regulatory capital, a new common 

equity tier 1 minimum capital 

requirement, a higher minimum tier 1 

capital requirement, and, for banking 

organizations subject to the Advanced 

Approaches capital rules, a 

supplementary leverage ratio that 

incorporates a broader set of exposures 

in the denominator measure. In 

addition, the rule will amend the 

methodologies for determining risk 

weighted assets. All banking 

organizations that are not subject to the 

Advanced Approaches Rule must begin 

to comply with the revised capital 

framework on January 1, 2015. 

Due to the timing of the Dodd-Frank 

Act stress test and the revised capital 

rulemaking, the FDIC considered several 

options for the timing and scope of this 

proposal to collect information related 

to the capital rulemaking. On August 13, 

2014, the FDIC published in the Federal 

Register, a 60-day information 

collection notice requesting public 

comment on proposed revisions to the 

stress testing reporting templates.10 The 

FDIC received one comment. The 

commenter expressed concerns that 

covered banks will lack the relevant 

data for the stress testing requirements 

ahead of when these items are required 

to be reported in the Consolidated 

Report of Condition and Income (‘‘Call 

Reports’’). After carefully considering 

this comment, the FDIC has made minor 

technical changes and clarifications to 

the reporting instructions as described 

below. 

The FDIC proposes to revise the FDIC 

DFAST 10–50 Summary Schedule by 

adding a common equity tier 1 capital 

data item and the FDIC DFAST 10–50 

Balance Sheet Schedules (baseline, 

adverse, and severely adverse scenarios) 

by adding a common equity tier 1 risk 

based capital ratio data item in order to 

reflect the requirements of the revised 

capital framework. These revisions to 

the FDIC 10–50 DFAST reporting forms 

would apply beginning in the 2015 

stress test cycle in which covered banks 

must report by March 31, 2015. 

In addition, the FDIC proposes to 

clarify the FDIC DFAST 10–50 reporting 

form instructions to emphasize that a 

covered bank should transition to the 

revised capital framework requirements 

in its bank-run stress test projections in 

the quarter in which the revised capital 

framework requirements become 

effective. Specifically, a covered bank 

would be required to comply with the 

revised capital framework and begin 

including the common equity tier 1 

capital data item and common equity 

tier 1 risk based capital ratio data item 

in projected quarter 2 (1st quarter, 2015) 

through projected quarter 9 (4th quarter, 

2016) for each supervisory scenario for 

the 2015 stress test cycle. 

The FDIC also proposes several 

clarifications to the FDIC DFAST 10–50 

reporting form instructions, including: 

Indicating that the Scenario Variables 

Schedule would be collected as a 

reporting form in Reporting Central 

(instead of as a file submitted in Adobe 

Acrobat PDF format); clarifying what 

covered banks should include in line 

items 32 and 33 (retail and wholesale 

funding) on the Balance Sheet Schedule 

with reference to relevant Call Report 

line items; clarifying the disallowed 

deferred tax asset and unrealized gains 

and losses on available-for-sale (‘‘AFS’’) 

securities line items; clarifying the 

descriptions of the total capital and total 

risk-based capital line items; and 

finally, clarifying how the supporting 

qualitative information should be 

organized. 

Burden Estimates 

The FDIC estimates the burden of this 

collection of information as follows: 

Current 

Number of Respondents: 22. 

Annual Burden per Respondent: 464 

hours. 

Total Annual Burden: 10,208 hours. 

Proposed 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

22. 

Estimated Annual Burden per 

Respondent: 469 hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden: 

10,318 hours. 

The burden for each $10 billion to $50 

billion covered bank that completes the 

FDIC DFAST 10–50 Results Template 

and FDIC DFAST 10–50 Scenario 

Variables Template is estimated to be 

469 hours. The burden to complete the 

FDIC DFAST 10–50 Results Template is 

estimated to be 440 hours, including 20 

hours to input these data and 420 hours 

for work related to modeling efforts. The 

burden to complete the FDIC DFAST 

10–50 Scenario Variables Template is 

estimated to be 29 hours. The total 

burden for all 22 respondents to 

complete both templates is estimated to 

be 10,318 hours, or an increase to the 

total burden of 110 hours. 

Comments are invited on all aspects 

of the proposed changes to the 

information collection, particularly: 

(a) Whether the collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

FDIC, including whether the 

information has practical utility; 

(b) The accuracy of the FDIC’s 

estimate of the burden of the collection 

of information; 

(c) Ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; 

(d) Ways to minimize the burden of 

the collection on respondents, including 

through the use of automated collection 

techniques or other forms of information 

technology; 

(e) Estimates of capital or start-up 

costs and costs of operation, 

maintenance, and purchase of services 

to provide information; and 

(f) The ability of FDIC-supervised 

banks and savings associations with 

assets between $10 billion and $50 

billion to provide the requested 

information to the FDIC by March 31, 

2015. 

Dated at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of 

December 2014. 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 

Robert E. Feldman, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28708 Filed 12–8–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6714–01–P 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meetings 

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission 

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, December 11, 

2014 at 10:00 a.m. 

PLACE: 999 E Street NW., Washington, 

DC (Ninth Floor) 

STATUS: This meeting will be open to 

the public. 

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES