alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Real, Realistic Ring Waves for Surge Testing

François Martzloff

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Gaithersburg MD 20899 USA

f.martzloff@ieee.org

Guiseppe Pellegrini

Italian Electricity Board (ENE

Automatica Research Cente

Milano, Italy

Reprinted, with permission, from 

Proceedings, 9th International Zürich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 19

Significance:

Part 2 – Development of standards - Reality checks

Part 5 – Monitoring instruments, laboratory measurements, test methods

Standards for surge testing have a long tradition of using unidirectional waves (“impulses”), in part

voltage impulse and an 8/20 current impulse. Many surveys of surge activity in low-voltage AC po

shown that a large number of recordings actually include oscillatory surges rather than unidirection

This paper provides examples of such waveforms, independently recorded by two organizations, o

and one in Italy. These examples draw on field measurements as well as laboratory experiments a

make the case that Ring Waves should be included in the regimen of electromagnetic compatibility 

Filename: Real waves
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4742 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4742

     To suspend temporarily the duty on Foron Blue S-BGL granules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2004

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on Foron Blue S-BGL granules.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON FORON BLUE S-BGL GRANULES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.35.06      Foron Blue S-BGL    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         granules                                                           31/2008
                         (anthraquinone
                         dye) (CAS No.
                         31529-83-6)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3204.11.10.......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
May 29, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DRAKE INTERIORS, L.L.C., Appellant

NO. 14-13-00349-CV V.

ANDREA MARIE THOMAS AND ROBERT WARREN THOMAS, Appellees

________________________________

This court today issued a substitute opinion. We order this court’s former 

judgment of April 3, 2014, vacated, set aside, and annulled. We further order this 

court’s opinion of April 3, 2014, withdrawn. We deny the motions for rehearing 

filed by appellant, Drake Interiors, L.L.C., and by appellee, Andrea Marie Thomas.

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Andrea Marie 

Thomas, signed March 20, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We 

have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the 

judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for 

proceedings in accordance with the court’s opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellee, Andrea Marie Thomas.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MOBILE AMERICA FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        37,607,325
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       49,094,824
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         48,991,063
<EQUITIES>                                   1,348,177
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             110,281,958
<CASH>                                       1,802,644
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              31,935
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      (2,734,995)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             168,086,901
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             47,695,655
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         38,118,629
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             12,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       168,010
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,009,011
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               168,086,901
<PREMIUMS>                                  30,691,533
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          5,935,194
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             521,995
<OTHER-INCOME>                              11,015,213
<BENEFITS>                                  22,338,007
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  2,653,599
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        14,186,165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,986,164
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,414,772
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,571,392
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,571,392
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.21
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              20,808,027
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         27,215,881
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                           (3,390,000)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                          15,428,840
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                             9,164,329
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             20,040,739
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                      4,323,000


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this registration statement on Form S-8, to be filed on or around
August 28, 1998, of our report dated May 27, 1998, on the consolidated financial
statements of WorldCom, Inc. included in WorldCom, Inc.'s Current Report on Form
8-K dated May 28, 1998 (filed May 28, 1998). We also consent to the
incorporation by reference in this registration statement of our report dated
June 26, 1998 on the financial statements included in the WorldCom, Inc. 401(k)
Salary Savings Plan Form 11-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 and to all
references to our Firm in this registration statement.



                                                ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Jackson, Mississippi,
August 27, 1998
PSIAP Reporting Requirements Quick Reference Guide

1. Quarterly: 

a. Quarters end Mar 31, Jun 30, Sep 30, and Dec 31

b. Reports due 30 days after quarter end and include:

i. Federal financial report (SF-425)

ii. Technical report – adhere to OMB-approved Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) format

1. Standard cover page

2. Accomplishments

3. Changes/problems

2. Annual:

a. For periods ending Jun 30 in 2018, 2019, and 2020 (when applicable)

b. Reports due 30 days after period end and include:

i. Federal financial report (SF-425)

ii. Technical report – RPPR format

1. Standard cover page

2. Accomplishments

3. Products

4. Participants and other collaborating organizations

5. Impact

a. In addition to standard info, describe the impact the project has regarding first responder 

communications and operations

6. Changes/problems

3. Final:

a. Reports due 90 days after POP ends and include:

i. Federal financial report SF-425

ii. Technical report – RPPR format

1. Standard cover page

2. Accomplishments

3. Products

4. Participants and other collaborating organizations

5. Impact

a. In addition to standard info, describe the impact the project has regarding first responder

communications and operations

6. Changes/problems
Section QUARTERLY ANNUAL FINAL

Period ends Mar 31, Jun 30, 

Sep 30, Dec 31 Jun 30

Reports due 30 days after 

period end

30 days after 

period end

90 days after POP 

ends

SF-425 ● ● ●

Cover page ● ● ●

Accomplishments ● ● ●

Products ● ●

Participants and other collaborating 

organizations ● ●

Impact* ● ●

Changes/problems ● ● ●

Special reporting req’ts No longer required No longer required

Budgetary information No longer required No longer required

Content Last Q ONLY Year-to-date Entire project

*Include impacts to first responder comms and operations
Exhibit 12.1
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Shoei Utsuda, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mitsui & Co., Ltd.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company andhave:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared;  (b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of SEC Release No. 33-8238]  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: September 30, 2004     By  /s/ Shoei Utsuda                                                                       Name:
#### T. J. Lockridge’s Adm’r *v.*Samuel Stone.

Bills and Notes — Failure to Pay — Measure of Damages.

Where notes were payable in “confederate treasury notes,” upon failure to so pay at the time stipulated for payment, the measure of damages is their value at the time and place of payment.

Bills and Notes — Place of Payment.

Where no place of payment of a note is fixed the law fixes the place of the residence of the payee.

APPEAL, FROM BATH CIRCUIT COURT.

June 26, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

If the stipulation across the face of the paper sued on was there when it was delivered to appellant’s intestate it formed a part of the contract. After it was executed and delivered it was in custody of .the payee, and it could not have been altered, or materially changed without his knowledge or participation, or if it was so changed he must account for it.

From all that appears in the case the words across the face of the note “Receivable in Confederate Treasury Notes,” must be regarded as forming a part of the contract and an agreement to accept such notes in satisfaction of the debt. And upon the failure of the obligor to pay the notes at the time stipulated for payment, the criterion of damage will be their value at the time and place of payment, and as no place of payment was fixed by the parties, the law fixes the place of the residence of the payee. And it does not appear from the evidence that Confederate treasury notes on the 1st of June, 1862, had any market value in Jackson County, Missouri, or that they could be used and circulated, their circulation as money, or representatives of the value of property, having been prohibited.

*36
      *Hwt, for appellant.*

*Stone, for appellee.*

The proper inquiry for the jury therefore was the value of the Confederate treasury notes at the time and place of payment, and as the. verdict comports with the weight of the evidence on that issue, the judgment of the court below must be *affirmed.*
4/27/22, 6:44 AM blob:https://wwwidms.gov/la5175da-7046-4b7b-8c27-5bd7eeal0658 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: 4/27/22 6:44 AM 

Received: April 25, 2022 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No_ 12f-2jil-6om2 

Comments Due: April 25, 2022 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: NIST-2022-0001 

Evaluating and Improving NIST Cybersecurity Resources: The Cybersecurity Framework and 

Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management 

Comment On: NIST-2022-0001-0001 

RFI-2022-03642 

Document: NIST-2022-000 l-DRAFT-0049 

Comment on FR Doc # NIA 

Submitter Information 

Name: P 

Addre 

Email: 

General Comment 

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework would benefit from additional guidance related to robust C-SCRM 

program development. Additional best practice guidelines would beneficially focus on continuous 

monitoring requirements, mitigation practices, supplier cybersecurity guidelines, and auditing criteria for 

self-assessment/improvement for C-SCRM programs at both government agencies and private sector 

entities 

blob:https://www idms .gov/la5175da-7046-4b7b-8c27-5bd7eeal0658 1/1 
4/27/22, 6:46 AM blob:https://www1dms.gov/9lafed68-f562-4be7-8la2-b5f2bb8877dl 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: 4/27/22 6:46 AM 

Received: April 25, 2022 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No_ 12f-2hs-zbu5 

Comments Due: April 25, 2022 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: NIST-2022-0001 

Evaluating and Improving NIST Cybersecurity Resources: The Cybersecurity Framework and 

Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management 

Comment On: NIST-2022-0001-0001 

RFI-2022-03642 

Document: NIST-2022-000 l-DRAFf-0050 

Comment on FR Doc # NIA 

Submitter Information 

Name: P 

Addre 

Email: 

General Comment 

NIST' s Cybersecurity Framework would benefit from more targeted supplemental information related to 

specific critical infrastmcture sectors. While the general CSF is a solid foundation, the challenges facing 

each sector are unique for both the private sector and government. More targeted, sector-specific guidance 

within the CSF could articulate best practices informed by government-private sector partnerships and 

information sharing. Recommend aligning any sector-specific CSF guidance with existing schema of 

critical infrastructure and/or National Critical Functions. 

blob:https://www1dms.gov/9lafed68-f562-4be7-8la2-b5f2bb8877dl 1/1
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10792 Conference Calendar

__________________
PRESTON BRIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JACK HAMPTON, Judge; JOHN VANCE; MATT FRY, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CV-1040-T

- - - - - - - - - - December 20, 1995 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * IT IS ORDERED that Preston Briggs's motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel are DENIED, because his appeal lacks arguable merit and is therefore frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Appellant's brief does not challenge the basis of theNo. 95-10792 -2- district court's dismissal of his case: that he could not bring a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit because the criminal conviction that was challenged had not been reversed, expunged, declared invalid, or called into question by the issuance of a federal writ of habeas corpus. Nor does appellant challenge the district court's determination that Defendants Vance and Hampton are entitled to absolute immunity from suit for damages. We caution Briggs that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Briggs is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court.
MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
# Mestek, Inc.

260 North Elm StreetWestfield,
Massachusetts 01085

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER

# PURSUANT TO

# 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

# AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

# SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Mestek, Inc. (the Corporation) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John E. Reed, Chief Executive
Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: April 14, 2004 | By:                            
|-------------------- | -------------------------------
|                     | Name:  John E. Reed            
|                     | Title:  Chief Executive Officer
#### Lawrence County Court *v.*Thos. P. Salyer, Etc.

Counties — Contract—Pleading—Presumption.

In an action on a contract made with a county court, it is not necessary to allege that the contract was approved by the court, as sucb approval may be presumed.

Counties — Breach of Contract — Unliquidated Damages.

In an action for unliquidated damages for breach of a contract made with the county court, it Is not necessary for the County Court to make an order appointing some one to receive and receipt for the same.

*196APPEAL FROM LAWRENCE CIRCUIT COURT.

October 13, 1873.

*Hatcher &*Browns, *for appellant.*

-, *for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The contract in this case is with the “County Court” of Lawrence County. It is therefore proper that the suit shall be prosecuted in its name. The joining of the parties with the county judge may be a misjoinder but is not a defect of parties. The amended petition filed October 24th, 1871, sufficiently alleges that the parties suing are the judge and justices composing the county court, and that said court had power to appoint a commissioner of roads. That Osborne was the superintendent or commissioner and that the bridge built by Salyer was within the jurisdiction of said court. It was not pecessary to allege that the contract was approved by the county court. The contract shows upon its face that it was entered into by the court itself as a contracting party. It must be presumed that it was so approved, as it was for the benefit of the county, and if it was not, and the order directing Osborne to negotiate the contract required him to submit his action to the county court for its approval, and he failed to do so>, or the court failed to approve it, this is matter of defense that does, not arise upon demurrer. As this action is for unliquidated damages, it was not necessary before suit for the county court to make an order, appointing some person to receive and receipt for the same, as in actions for specific debts, such as was sued on in the *Owens v. Ballard County Court,*8th Bush 611. We are of the opinion the petition as amended presented a cause of action. Hence the judgment sustaining the demurrer and dismissing said petition is reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to overrule the demurrer and for further proper proceedings.
H. R. 4556

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1115 South

Clinton Avenue in Dunn, North Carolina, as the ‘‘General William Carey Lee

Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

1115 South Clinton Avenue in Dunn, North Carolina, shall be

known and designated as the ‘‘General William Carey Lee Post

Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘General

William Carey Lee Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.