alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Felix Mercer *v.*R. B. Henderson and Wife.

Attorney and Client — Attorney’s Lien.

Tbe court may properly adjudge attorneys, who procured a judgment for damages, a prior lien on the judgment for the services rendered.

*449Judgment — Set-off.

The right to set off one judgment against another was held not to exist, not only because there is not a mutuality of the parties to the two judgments, but because a third party is a meritorious claimant . to one of the judgments.

APPEAL PROM MARION CIRCUIT COURT.

January 19, 1874.

*W. I. Lisle, for appellant.*

*Russell & Averitt, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Hardin:

The action of the court in adjudging and enforcing the claim of the attorneys, Russell and Arnett, to a prior lien on the judgment for $500 damages, seems to have been in conformity to the recent decision of this court in the case of Robertson v. Shott, and fully authorized by the statute. We are also of the opinion that the court prope'rly refused to apply any part of the $500 as a set-off against the appellant’s $400 judgment, not only because there was not an exact mutuality of parties to the two judgments, but also because Mrs. Emaline Henderson, against whom the appellant had no judgment or claim, being the meritorious claimant of the judgment for $500 as compensation for personal wrongs and injuries done to her, as well as a co-plaintiff with her husband in the suit to recover it, had a right to interpose, as she did, to prevent its exclusive application to the satisfaction of a debt of the appellant against her husband alone.

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

YORK COUNTY PRISON,

Petitioner

v.

TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 776,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 163 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of May, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice Brobson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
** **
**     Exhibit      10(l)(2)**

| 1.   | Effective                as of January 1, 1996, Section 4.02 of the Plan is amended to provide                as                follows: |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**Section      4.02. Deferrals.**

| 2.   | Effective                as of January 1, 1996, the Plan is amended to add a new Section 4.02-A                immediately following Section 4.02 to provide as                follows: |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**Section      4.02-A. Allocation of Employer Matching Contributions.**
** **

| 3.   | Effective                as of January 1, 1996, the Plan is amended to add a new Section 4.02-B                immediately following Section 4.02-A to provide as                follows: |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**Section      4.02 B. Allocation of Employer Qualified Nonelective      Contribution.**

| 4.   | Effective                as of January 1, 1996, the Plan is amended to add a new Section 4.02-C                immediately following Section 4.02-B to provide as                follows: |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**Section      4.02-C. Credits to Participant’s Thrift Plan Excess Benefit      Account.**
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000389

21-OCT-2015

02:07 PM
Ref. 13-018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S 1998 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO
SUCH ANNUAL REPORT.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,857
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,989
<INVENTORY>                                     65,429
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,721
<PP&E>                                         795,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                 334,491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 912,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,635
<BONDS>                                        214,005
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           280
<OTHER-SE>                                     448,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   912,332
<SALES>                                        519,911
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               531,406
<CGS>                                          412,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  481,155
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   222
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,948
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,303
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,329
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,974
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,974
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.84
        

</TABLE>
9709.

#### United States Printing & Lithographing Company *v.*Stovall-Jones Company.

Bloodworth, J.

1. Without authority to do so", the manager of a corporation engaged in the. wholesale grocery business, who is “the purchasing agent for the company” and secretary and treasurer thereof, can not bind the corporation by signing notes for stock in another corporation. ' Where 'Such a note was signed and given in the name of a corporation by its manager, and a plea of non est factum was filed, and it was not shown either that there was a course of dealing from which authority to sign.the notes could be implied, or that the seal of the corporation was affixed to the note, or that the act was ratified by the corporation, or that express authority to sign the note was given to the manager, but on the contrary he testified that “this transaction was not discussed with our directors; I have never advised them anything of it. . . I do not hold anything at all representing the stock we got from the Lewis Bear Drug Company at the time this note was executed,” the note was properly rejected as evidence, upon' objection that the execution thereof was not proved and that it was not shown that the manager had authority to' sign it. While slight evidence is ' sufficient to lay the foundation for the admission of a note the execution of which is denied by a plea of non est factum, still the sufficiency *473of this evidence is for determination by the court. *Patton*v. *Bank of LaFayette,*124 *Ga.*965 (5) (53 S. E. 664).

Decided February 20, 1919.

Complaint; from Ben Hill superior court—Judge Crum, March *4,*1918.

*Bldridge Cutts, McDonald & Bennett,*for plaintiff.

*Wall & Grantham, Otis H. Elkins,*for defendant.

2. The note sued on having been rejected as above stated, and the plaintiff offering no further evidence, the court did not err in granting a nonsuit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
NVLAP LAB BULLETIN NUMBER: LB-130-2020 PAGE: 1 of 1

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

ISSUE DATE:

June 16, 2020

LAB BULLETIN NUMBER: LB-130-2020

LAP: Carpet and Carpet 

Cushion LAP

SUBJECT: Release of NIST Handbook 150-6, 2020 Edition

NIST Handbook 150-6, which presents the technical requirements and guidance for the 

accreditation of laboratories under the NVLAP Carpet and carpet Cushion (CCC) LAP, has been 

revised. 

The following are the primary changes that have been made with this revision of 

Handbook 150-6:

• the numbering has been updated to reflect that used by ISO/IEC 17025:2017, General 

requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.

 

• requirements that closely duplicated existing requirements in either ISO/IEC 17025 or NIST 

Handbook 150 have been removed.

The 2020 edition of NIST Handbook 150-6 supersedes and replaces the 2006 edition effective 

immediately. It is available for downloading (PDF format) from the NVLAP website 

<http://www.nist.gov/nvlap> under NVLAP Program-Specific Handbooks. The corresponding 

NIST Handbook 150-6 Checklist (ISO/IEC 17025:2017) has also been updated and posted on the 

NVLAP website under NVLAP Publications and Forms.

Questions concerning the revised handbook or requirements for accreditation should be directed 

to Timothy Rasinski at 301-975-6697, or <timothy.rasinski@nist.gov>.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, James W. Bernau, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Quarterly Report of Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.




Date: August 10, 2012
By:
/s/ James W. BernauJames W. BernauTitle: Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. and will be retained by Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. specifically incorporates it by reference.
<PAGE>   1




                                                                      EXHIBIT 23




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our report
dated June 23, 1998 on the Newmont Gold Company Salaried Retirement Savings
Plan, included in this Form 11-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.







/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Denver, Colorado,
     June 26, 1998.
Dilution Fridge and ICEoxford OC

Sample Mounting and Height Adjustment

15T Dilution Fridge

Bottom of the top 

mounting flange

Taper part begins

where top of IVC stops

Bottom mounting 

flange with a 5/16-18 

threaded hole in it, 

7/8“ deep

adjustable 

<= 924mm

330mm

fixed

IVC OD=48mm, ID=44mm

use with OC

427mm

fixed

Bottom wall is 

6mm thick

355mm

Neutron window is 

59 mm high

342mm

Bottom wall is 

7mm thick

300mm

208mm

247mm

Neutron window is 

39 mm high

414mm

Golden IVC 

use with 15T magnet

For using with ICEoxford OC/HFBS OC, the distance 

between the top flange to beam center is 1305mm, plus 

4mm Oring =1309mm. With the 15T DR’s flange on the 

very top position, after mounting the cylindrical IVC, the 

distance between the bottom of the flange and the center 

of the neutron window is 1310 mm. Perfect fit!

There is 1.5mm space between the top of IVC and top of 

the taper part. After mounting on the IVC, 

924+1.5+384.5=1310 mm. So the center of sample needs 

to be 384.5+1.5-330=56 mm below the MC mounting 

hole. Maximum length is 90 mm. Otherwise touching the 

IVC bottom. Active length is 56+-29cm. Sample diameter 

<= 33 mm. Sample holder needs to have a 5/16-18 bolt 

<=3/8” long or a 5/16-18 threaded hole.

A 12mm long copper adapter has been made so 56 mm 

can be reduced to 44 mm.

384.5 mm

beam center

14 mm OD

570mm

1/2"

Standard IVC use with 10T 

Lemon or IceOxford OC
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.43
                                                               Mel G. Todd F.S.A
                                                                 President & CEO


                         [CLARK/BARDES INC. LETTERHEAD]
                                                            
August 14, 1998


VIA FACSIMILE

Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
Attention:  Mr. Mark Corbett
8515 East Orchard Road
Englewood, Colorado 80111

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In consideration of our continued business relationship and current financing
activities, this letter of amendment shall serve to amend Annex A (Consideration
for Purchase of Warrants) of our letter of June 11, 1998. Specifically, the
amount $1,600,000 contained in clause (b) of item 1) shall be replaced, pursuant
to this letter of amendment, with $1,200,000.  All other terms and conditions of
the June 11th letter, including Annex A and other attachments, shall remain
unchanged by this letter of amendment.

If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please sign in the space provided
below and fax a copy of this letter of amendment to Clark/Bardes, Inc. at (214)
871-7690, Attention: Melvin G. Todd, whereupon this letter of amendment shall
become a binding agreement between us.


Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company

By:                                               By:
   --------------------------                        ---------------------------

-----------------------------                     ------------------------------
[Printed Name]                                    [Printed Name]

-----------------------------                     ------------------------------
[Title]                                           [Title]


Clark/Bardes, Inc.

By:/s/ MEL TODD
   --------------------------
Mel Todd
-----------------------------
[Printed Name]

President & CEO
-----------------------------
[Title]
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated March 6, 1998, which appears on page
F-2 of the 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Brigham Exploration Company for
the year ended December 31, 1997. 


/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP


Houston, Texas
June 15, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-29-1998
<CASH>                                         423,988
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,844,419
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,331,076
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,159,999
<PP&E>                                       1,967,385
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,430,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,712,518
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,489,722
<COMMON>                                           591
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,430,204
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,065,068
<CGS>                                        4,153,050
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,891,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (57,731)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                962,513
<INCOME-TAX>                                   385,005
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            577,508
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   577,508
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT,

Petitioner

v.

JET

- SET RESTAURANT, LLC,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 327 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13 th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is GRANTED

, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. The issue, restated for

clarity is:

Does the definition of “frequenting” set forth in Appeal of Speranza , 206 A.2d 292 (Pa. 1965) still apply to Section 4

- 493(14) of the Liquor Code, or do the 2003
Amendments to the Code demonstrate the General Assembly’s intent that a minor may not be inside a licensed premises even a single time unless one of the exceptions enumerated in Section 4

- 493(14) applies?

Allowance of appeal is DENIED as to all remaining issues.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4134 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4134

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify the deduction 
            for points paid with respect to home mortgages.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 2004

 Mr. Houghton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify the deduction 
            for points paid with respect to home mortgages.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Home Mortgage Tax Simplification Act 
of 2004''.

SEC. 2. SIMPLIFICATION OF DEDUCTION FOR POINTS ON HOME MORTGAGE.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (g) of section 461 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to prepaid interest) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Exception for certain refinancings.--
                    ``(A) In general.--This subsection shall not apply 
                to points paid in respect of indebtedness secured by 
                such residence resulting from the refinancing of 
                indebtedness meeting the requirements of paragraph (2) 
                or this paragraph.
                    ``(B) Limitation.--Subparagraph (A) shall apply 
                only to the extent the amount of the indebtedness 
                resulting from such refinancing does not exceed the sum 
                of--
                            ``(i) the amount of the refinanced 
                        indebtedness, plus
                            ``(ii) the lesser of $10,000 or the points 
                        paid in respect of the indebtedness resulting 
                        from the refinancing to the extent that the 
                        indebtedness resulting from the refinancing 
                        does not exceed the refinanced indebtedness.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The heading of paragraph (2) of section 
461(g) of such Code is amended by inserting ``based on business 
practice'' after ``Exception''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4481 

To amend Public Law 86–434 establishing Wilson’s Creek National Battlefield in the State of Missouri to expand the boundaries of the park, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 2, 2004 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. AKIN, Mr. CLAY, Ms. MCCARTHY

of Missouri, Mr. SKELTON, Mrs. EMERSON, Mr. GEPHARDT, and Mr. 

HULSHOF) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 86–434 establishing Wilson’s Creek 

National Battlefield in the State of Missouri to expand 

the boundaries of the park, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wilson’s Creek Na5 tional Battlefield Boundary Adjustment Act of 2004’’. 
2 

•HR 4481 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF BOUNDARIES, WILSON’S CREEK NA2 TIONAL BATTLEFIELD, MISSOURI. 

3 (a) BOUNDARY EXPANSION.—The first section of 

4 Public Law 86–434 (16 U.S.C. 430kk) is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘That the Secretary’’ and in6 serting the following: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 1. WILSON’S CREEK NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD: ESTAB8 LISHMENT AND ACQUISITION OF LANDS. 

9 ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT, INITIAL BOUNDARIES.—The 

10 Secretary’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub12 section: 

13 ‘‘(b) EXPANSION OF BOUNDARIES.—(1) The bound14 aries of the Wilson’s Creek National Battlefield are revised 

15 to include lands and interests therein consisting of six par16 cels totaling 615 acres and identified as parcels ‘1, 2, 3, 

17 4, 5, and 6’ on the map entitled ‘Wilson’s Creek National 

18 battlefield Proposed Boundary’, numbered 410/80,037 

19 and dated January 27, 2004. The map shall be on file 

20 and available for public inspection in the appropriate of21 fices of the National Park Service. 

22 ‘‘(2) The Secretary is authorized to acquire the lands 

23 referred to in paragraph (1) by donation, by purchase 

24 from willing sellers with donated or appropriated funds, 

25 or by exchange. The Secretary may acquire by the same 
3 

•HR 4481 IH 

1 methods personal property associated with, and appro2 priate for, interpretation of the park.’’. 

3 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

4 3 of such Act (16 U.S.C. 430mm) is amended by adding 

5 at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘There are author6 ized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary 

7 to carry out section 1(b).’’. 

Æ