alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4816 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4816

To permit the Librarian of Congress to hire Library of Congress Police 
                               employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2004

  Mr. Ney (for himself and Mr. Larson of Connecticut) introduced the 
     following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit the Librarian of Congress to hire Library of Congress Police 
                               employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITTING LIBRARIAN OF CONGRESS TO HIRE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 
              POLICE EMPLOYEES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1006 of the Legislative Branch 
Appropriations Act, 2004 (2 U.S.C. 1901 note), is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``Training, Detailing, and 
        Hiring'' and inserting ``Training and Detailing'';
            (2) by striking ``(a)'' and the heading of subsection (a);
            (3) by striking subsection (b) and redesignating paragraphs 
        (1) and (2) of subsection (a) as subsections (a) and (b); and
            (4) in subsection (b) (as so redesignated), by striking 
        ``paragraph (1)'' and inserting ``subsection (a)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of the Legislative Branch 
Appropriations Act, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
#### Davis *v.*Varn Turpentine & Cattle Company (five cases).

Hines, J.

1. The land-registration act provides, that, “In all matters not otherwise provided for, the procedure upon the examiner’s report and the exceptions thereto shall be in accordance with procedure prevailing in this State as to auditor’s reports in equity and exceptions thereto.” *691Acts 1917, pp. 108, 116; 9 Park’s Code Supp. 1922, § 4215 (t); Michie’s Code, § 4215 (20); *Bird*v. *South Ga. Industrial Co.,*150 *Ga.*420, 421 (104 S. E. 232); *Manion*v. *Varn,*152 *Ga.*654 (2) (111 S. E. 30).

Nos. 6816, 6817, 6818, 6819, 6820.

January 18, 1929.

2. The neglect of a party excepting to an examiner’s report on matters of fact, or on matters of law dependent for a decision upon the evidence, to set forth, in connection with each exception of law or fact, the evidence necessary to be considered in passing thereon, or to point out the same by appropriate reference, or to attach as exhibits to his exceptions those portions of the evidence relied on to support the exceptions, is sufficient reason in a. land-registration proceeding for dismissing or disapproving the exceptions of fact and for overruling or dismissing the exceptions of law. *Manion*v. *Varn,*supra (3).

3. Applying the principles above ruled, the court did not err in dismissing the exceptions to the conclusions of fact and law filed by the defendant, Sallie Davis, to the final report of the auditor.

4. In the absence of a proper exception to a finding of fact by an examiner in a land-registration case, there is no issue to be submitted to a jury; and the court did not err in refusing to permit the jury to pass upon any issue of fact raised by the pleadings and evidence in the case.

5. The objector demurred to the petition of the plaintiff. The examiner overruled her demurrer. In her exceptions to the final report of the examiner she excepted to that ruling. The court dismissed her exceptions to the final report of the examiner, including her exception to his ruling on her demurrer to the petition; and she excepted pendente lite to this judgment of the court, and assigned error thereon in the bills of exceptions in these eases. After dismissing the exceptions of the objector, the court rendered a separate judgment overruling her demurrer to the petition. To this judgment she did not except. *Held,*that the objector is concluded by the judgment of the court overruling her demurrer to the petition, and will not now be heard to say that the petition sets forth no cause of action, notwithstanding the fact that in her bills of exceptions she assigned error on her exceptions pendente lite to the judgment dismissing her exceptions to the final report of the examiner, including her exception to his ruling on her demurrer.

*Judgments affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*694*E. E. Williams,*for plaintiff in error.

*Copeland & Dulces*and *E. L.*Causey, contra.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4735 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4735

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to make a grant to the World 
 Food Prize Foundation to assist the Foundation in covering renovation 
     expenses related to the World Food Prize, which is awarded to 
  individuals who make vital contributions to improving the quality, 
        quantity, or availability of food throughout the world.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2004

 Mr. Latham (for himself, Mr. Nussle, Mr. Boswell, Mr. Leach, and Mr. 
King of Iowa) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to make a grant to the World 
 Food Prize Foundation to assist the Foundation in covering renovation 
     expenses related to the World Food Prize, which is awarded to 
  individuals who make vital contributions to improving the quality, 
        quantity, or availability of food throughout the world.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GRANT TO WORLD FOOD PRIZE FOUNDATION.

    (a) Grant Authorized.--The Secretary of Agriculture may make a 
grant to the World Food Prize Foundation of Des Moines, Iowa, to assist 
the Foundation in covering renovation expenses related to its award of 
the World Food Prize, which honors individuals who make vital 
contributions to improving the quality, quantity, or availability of 
food throughout the world.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary $2,000,000 to make the grant authorized 
by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70862-70863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28112]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-357-000]


Chief Keystone Power, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Chief Keystone Power, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an

[[Page 70863]]

accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is December 11, 2014.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#692f2c3b2a26070500070c3a1c1919061b1d290f0c1b0a470e061f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="074142554448696b6e696254727777687573476162756429606871">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: November 21, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-28112 Filed 11-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

Prioritize and Modernize Core Activities

Strategic Plan (FY2023 – FY2027)

Our Vision is to lead the advancement of legal

metrology documentary standards and practices

to promote U.S. economic growth and fair trade

Our Mission is to establish uniformity, equity, SI

use, and traceability in weights and measures by

advancing national and international legal

metrology standards, procedures, capabilities,

and training

Our Values of Integrity, Objectivity and Consistency, Excellence and Expertise, Cooperation and

Collaboration enable us to produce the highest caliber of metrological services and standards

Engage with Critical and Emerging Technologies 

Promote the “Why” for Weights and Measures

Develop a U.S. Legal Metrology Center

Four (4) Strategic Objectives

Commercial 

Device 

Manufacturers

Consumers 

and Advocacy 

Groups

Industry 

and Trade 

Associations

Metric (SI)

and Metrology 

Educators

National and 

International 

SDOs

National 

Metrology 

Institutes

State and Local 

Weights & 

Measures

U.S. Federal 

Government 

Agencies 

Our 

Stakeholders

─ Prioritize current and traditional products and redesign for modern and more effective services

─ Promote interdisciplinary and collaborative projects and solutions and harmonize U.S. and 

international standards development

─ Develop foundational yet modular and agile products and services to solve problems of the future 

─ Identify and analyze emerging technological issues that impact weights and measures systems to 

ensure effective marketplace implementation and promote U.S. economic competitiveness

─ Integrate legal metrology concepts with new scientific and applied metrology areas

─ Understand the national measurement system risks, emerging technology, and needs of stakeholders

─ Conduct outreach to bridge the gaps across diverse stakeholder communities, including new industries, 

trade associations, and consumer groups

─ Enable OWM staff while building and leveraging relationships with related NIST metrology and services 

─ Strengthen effective collaborations with existing partners, and build relationships with new stakeholders

─ Advance a model, SI-traceable weights and measures infrastructure essential for present-day 

U.S. trade and commerce

─ Lead current and emergent U.S. weights and measures issues via new working group activities 

─ Provide access to stakeholders to a centralized hub of OWM products, services, and expertise
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4609 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to modify the definition of the 

United States for the purposes of the prohibition against torture. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2004 

Mr. MEEHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to modify the definition of the United States for the purposes of the prohibition against torture. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Torture Accountability 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF UNITED STATES. 

7 Section 2340(3) of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(3) ‘United States’ means the several States of 

10 the United States, the District of Columbia, and the 
2 

•HR 4609 IH 

1 commonwealths, territories, and possessions of the 

2 United States.’’. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72653-72654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28800]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Friday, December 12, 2014, 9:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, MD.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered: Decisional Matter: Fiscal Year 2015 Operating 
Plan.
    A live Webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at www.cpsc.gov/live.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West

[[Page 72654]]

Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: December 4, 2014.
Alberta E. Mills,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-28800 Filed 12-4-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION I, James H. Moore, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of Mines Management, Inc. (the registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting. 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 9, 2007 /s/ James H. Moore James H. Moore Chief Financial Officer    1
#### Wm. Richardson *v.*Commonwealth.

Gaming— Instruction.

■ An instruction, that in order to convict, the jury must believe that accused acted, not only as “lookout,” but that as such he assisted in the game, was held not to be erroneous.

APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

June 5, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

The instructions given for the commonwealth are free from any valid objections. Appellant does not make serious complaint to any of them except the one numbered 3.

The court did not, by said instruction, determine that a party who acted as “lookout” for a faro- bank, was necessarily guilty of the offense of setting up, exhibiting, and keeping a faro bank. The jury were bound, however, under the evidence in this case, to conclude that such was the fact. Still, they were left to- determine that *715question for themselves, being told by the court, that in order to convict, they must believe that appellant not only acted as “lookout,” but that, as such, he assisted'in conducting the game dealt by Tamp-pert. We see no error in the record prejudicial to appellant.

*Hanney, for appellant.*

*Read, for appellee.*

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended February 27,
2011 (the Report), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Kenneth L. HignettKenneth L. Hignett, Senior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Exhibit 23.1**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
        We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-163929, No. 333-19011, No. 333-71373, No. 333-42276, No. 333-45534, No.333-73652, No. 333-89176, and No. 333-141458), and on Form S-3 (No. 333-160577, No. 333-138023, No. 333-134666, No. 333-130977,No. 333-130423, No. 333-129141, No. 333-128020, No. 333-123902, No. 119645,No. 333-33612, No. 333-89257, No. 333-84587,  No. 333-79753, No. 333-76395,No. 333-141455, and 333-156393) of Microvision, Inc. of our report dated March 10, 2010,relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.
/s/  PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Seattle, Washington
NIST-1260

(REV. 8-2006)

ADMAN 2.03; ADMAN 15.06

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY

REPORT OF FOREIGN VISITOR(S), GUEST(S), CONFERENCE ATTENDEE(S)

REQUIRED FOR ALL FOREIGN VISITORS/GUESTS -- 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR VISITORS AND CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 

(SEND ORIGINAL TO OIAA) --30 DAYS IN ADVANCE FOR GUESTS (SEND ORIGINAL TO OSY, COPY TO OIAA)*

ADMINISTRATION/IPSG ELECTRONIC FORMS

CITIZENSHIP COUNTRIES OF DUAL CITIZENSHIP (If applicable)

NIST HOST(S) (Name, extension, e-mail) ORGANIZATIONAL CODE NUMBER

REASON FOR VISIT OR TITLE OF LECTURE(S)

ROOMS/BUILDINGS TO BE UTILIZED

REPORT PREPARED BY TELEPHONE EXTENSION DATE

FOLLOWING REQUIRED FOR LECTURERS ONLY (including signatures)

LECTURERS ONLY - GIVE BRIEF BIOGRAPHY

DIVISION CHIEF (NAME AND SIGNATURE) OU APPROVAL (NAME AND SIGNATURE)

RESPONSIBLE TECHNICAL STAFF MEMBER TELEPHONE EXTENSION ORGANIZATIONAL CODE NUMBER DATE

LECTURE FEE TRAVEL PER DIEM

$ $$

APPROVED - OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL AND ACADEMIC AFFAIRS (NAME AND SIGNATURE) DATE

FULL NAME

First Middle

DATE OF BIRTH

Last Month Day Year

PLACE OF BIRTH PASSPORT

City Country Issuing Country

TITLE/POSITION GENDER Male Female

EMPLOYER/SPONSOR TELEPHONE

ADDRESS

DATE(S) OF VISIT

COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE

Number

VISITOR (3 days or less) GUEST (more than 3 days)

*BOULDER DISTRIBUTION: SEND ORIGINAL TO OFFICE OF DIRECTOR (COPY WILL BE FORWARDED TO OIAA AND DOC SECURITY)

CONFERENCE ATTENDEE (5 days or less)

U. S. PERMANENT RESIDENT YES NO
#### R. B. Evans *v.*J. G. Hall & Lewis.

Descent and Distribution — Suit by Ancestor's Creditor.

• An heir cannot be sued by a creditor of the estate until the heir ■has received assets of the estate, and is only liable to the extent to which he has received assets of the estate.

APPEAL PROM BARREN CIRCUIT COURT.

February 4, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

It was the duty of Dickerson, as receiver in the case for the settlement of the Roger’s estate, to pay to Léwis such sums of money as were adjudged to him as heir at law of his deceased daughter, Mrs. Hall.

The petition discloses noi cause of action against Lewis. He is not the administrator of the estate of Mrs. Hall, and has as yet received nothing as heir at law.

In case appellant has a collectible claim against such estate, he may sue Lewis after he takes as heir, and hold him liable to the extent that he receives assets, but until he receives something he cannot be sued.

*482*W. L. Porter, Leslie, for appellant.*

*Lewis, for appellees.*

It does not appear that Lewis is insolvent; hence there is no reason why the chancellor should interpose to prevent Dickerson from, distributing the Rogers’ estate pursuant h> the decree under which he is acting. The petition was properly dismissed.

Judgment affirmed.