alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Granite Broadcasting Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), we, W. Don Cornwelland Lawrence I. Wills, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, asadopted pursuant section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of our knowledge:

 

(i)      the Form 10-Q fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(ii)     the information contained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated:  November10, 2004

 

 
|   | /s/            W.  DON CORNWELL   |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | W. Don Cornwell                                                                               |
|   | Chief Executive Officer                                                                       |
|   |                                                                                          |
|   |                                                                                          |
|   | /s/            LAWRENCE  I. WILLS |   |
|   | Lawrence I. Wills                                                                             |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                                                                       |

 

----
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Modern Controls, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-27730, 33-42255 and 33-49752) on Form S-8 of Modern Controls, Inc. of our
reports dated February 12, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Modern Controls, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the
related consolidated statements of income and cash flows and related financial
statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 1997, which reports appear in or are incorporated by reference in the
December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Modern Controls, Inc.


                                             /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 27, 1998
Proposed Updates to ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2005 

UTF8, GPS, Tracking Subcommittee 

Scott Hills, Aware, Inc. 

Rob Mungovan, Aware, Inc. 

Dale Hapeman, DOD-BFC 

Tony Misslin, Identix 

Bonny Scheier, Sabre 

Ralph Lessman, Smiths-Heimann 

Support for Submission Tracking Data 

An additional section would be needed to describe this change. This could be section 

“8.1.16 Field 1.016: Submission Tracking Field (STF)” 

This optional field is intended to provide a consistent, flexible, cross domain format, for 

tracking events related to the transaction during its lifetime. This information will be 

helpful in diagnosing problems and understanding the performance of a system. Each full 

entry in the STF field will include the time, agency, location and a text description of an 

event that affects the transaction. 

 Events of interest might include: 

• creation of the transaction 

• validation of the transaction 

• transaction receipt and/or forwarding by an intermediate agency 

• changes to the priority, PRY of the transaction 

• changes to the addressing of the transaction including the TCN, TCR, ORI or DAI 

• changes to the information content perhaps due to conversions required to 

transition from one domain to another including the TOT field and information in 

the type 2 or other records. 

• final archiving of a transaction. 

Each event would be stored in a separate subfield starting with the initial event. Each 

subfield would consist of 5 data items: 

GMT – Greenwich mean time. Identical definition to the old 1.014 field to allow 

backward compatibility 

AGN – Identifier of the Agency which has recorded the event 

LAT – Latitude of the location at which the event occurs in decimal degrees. The latitude 

value should be based on the WGS-84 datum. 
LON – Longitude of the location at which the event occurs in decimal degrees. The 

longitude value should be based on the WGS-84 datum. 

EVT – Free text description of the event. 

Example 

1.016:19991120235745Z<US>DCFBIWA6Z<US>39.144336<US>-77.216461 

<US>Transaction Created<FS> 

Addition of a similar field for Type 10-16 records 

A similar field is proposed for Type 10 – 16 Records. Its purpose is to record events 

relevant to the creation of the biometric and its related data. These events could include 

the place and time of capture of the biometric, compression, quality analysis, etc .
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We have issued our report dated March 24, 2011, accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of United Capital Corp. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of United Capital Corp. on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-28045, 33-65140, 333-28395, 333-57873 and 333-98645).
 
 
 
 /s/ Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLPHOLTZ RUBENSTEIN REMINICK LLP
 
 
 Melville, New York
 March 30, 2011
TERMINATION AGREEMENT

      THIS  TERMINATION  AGREEMENT  (the  "Agreement")  is made and entered into
effective  as of  November  __,  2005,  by and among  XSUNX,  INC.,  a  Colorado
corporation (the "Company"),  CORNELL CAPITAL  PARTNERS,  LP, a Delaware limited
partnership  (the  "Investor"),  and  NEWBRIDGE  SECURITIES  CORPORATION.   (the
"Placement Agent").

                                    Recitals:

      WHEREAS,  the  Company  and the  Investor  entered  into a Standby  Equity
Distribution  Agreement  (the "Standby  Equity  Distribution"),  a  Registration
Rights Agreement (the "Registration Rights Agreement"), an Escrow Agreement (the
"Escrow  Agreement"),  and the Company,  the Investor,  and the Placement  Agent
entered into a Placement Agent Agreement (the "Placement Agent Agreement"),  all
of which are dated July __, 2005 (collectively, the "Transaction Documents"). In
connection with the Standby Equity  Distribution  Agreement,  the Company issued
__________ shares of Common Stock to the Investor (the "Investor's  Shares") and
________________  shares of Common Stock to the Placement  Agent (the "Placement
Agent's Shares").

      NOW,  THEREFORE,  in consideration of the mutual promises,  conditions and
covenants  contained herein and in the Transaction  Documents and other good and
valuable  consideration,  receipt of which is hereby  acknowledged,  the parties
hereto agree as follows:

      1.    Termination.  The Company and the Investor,  and the Placement Agent
            with  respect to the  Placement  Agent  Agreement,  hereby  agree to
            terminate the  Transaction  Documents and the respective  rights and
            obligations  contained therein. As a result of this provision,  none
            of the parties  shall have any rights or  obligations  under or with
            respect to the Transaction Documents.

      2.    Shares.  The  Investor  shall retain the  Investor's  Shares and the
            Placement Agent shall retain the Placement  Agent's Shares,  and the
            Company shall register the resale of such shares by the Investor and
            the Placement Agent on the next registration statement it files.

                  [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]










<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed and delivered this Termination
Agreement on the date first set forth above.

XSUNX, INC.                                 CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP

                                            By:  Yorkville Advisors, LLC
By:                                         Its: General Partner
   ------------------------------
   Name:  Tom Djokovich
   Title: Chief Executive Officer           By:
                                               ------------------------------
                                               Name:  Mark A. Angelo
                                               Title: Portfolio Manager

With respect to the Placement Agent
Agreement:
PLACEMENT AGENT:
NEWBRIDGE SECURITIES CORPORATION


By:
   ------------------------------
   Name:
   Title:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-21126

Summary Calendar

 

JOYCE LYNN BANOWSKY FOGO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL,

Commissioner of Social 

Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 95-CV-1337

- - - - - - - - - -

October 31, 1997

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joyce Lynn Banowsky Fogo is appealing from the district

court’s judgment granting the defendant Commissioner’s motion for

summary judgment and affirming the Commissioner’s denial of old age

insurance benefits to Fogo.

Fogo argues that the Commissioner erred in applying the

regulations governing Fogo’s right to obtain old age benefits based

on her status as a divorced wife of an insured wage earner. Fogo
No. 96-21126

-2-

argues that the Commissioner erred in determining that she had not

received one-half of her support from her former husband during the

relevant period in light of her expenses incurred during that time.

Fogo also argues that the manner in which the regulations are

applied by the Commissioner discriminates against divorced wives

living in states governed by a community property system.

We have reviewed the record, including the administrative

record, and the briefs of the parties and find that the

Commissioner’s application of the regulations was not plainly

erroneous and that the decision was supported by substantial

evidence in the record. See Thomas Jefferson University v.

Shalala, 512 U.S. 504, 512 (1994); Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d

232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994). 

Fogo has no standing to assert the discrimination claim

because she has not shown that she was denied benefits based on the

alleged discriminatory application of the regulations. See Nevares

v. San Marcos Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist., 111 F.3d 25, 26 (5th Cir.

1997).

Therefore, the district court did not err in granting the

Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing Fogo’s

complaint.

AFFIRMED.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40301 

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DANYELL DEONCORE WATERS,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:94-CR-48-2

- - - - - - - - - -

November 6, 1995

Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Danyell Deoncore Waters appeals from the district court's

judgment of conviction, after entry of a conditional guilty plea,

for conspiring to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base. 

He argues that the district court erred by denying his to

suppress, by increasing his base offense level pursuant to

U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) for possession of a firearm during a drugtrafficking offense, by failing to reduce his base offense level
No. 95-40301

-2-

under § 3B1.2 for minor/minimal participant status, and that

§ 2D1.1 is violative of the Fourteenth Amendment as racially

discriminatory. Finding that the district court committed no

error and that Waters' contentions are unavailing, we AFFIRM.
#### City of Indianapolis *v.*Sturm et al.

*City.—Annexation of Territory.*— *Cotmty*Commissioners.—Aj>j>eal.—No appeal lies from the decision of a board of county commissioners annexing contiguous territory to a city.

APPEAL from the Marion Circuit Court.

Pettit, J.

This was a proceeding commenced before the *160Board of Commissioners of Marion county by the city of Indianapolis, which is situated in that county, to annex contiguous territory to the city, under secs. 85 and 86, 3 Ind. Stat. 108. The board of commissioners ordered the annexation, from which order the proper, or interested, parties appealed to the circuit court, when, on their motion, the case was dismissed. This ruling was excepted to and is assigned for error. It is also assigned for error that the circuit court had no jurisdiction of the cause, because no appeal lies from the commissioners in such a case.

*% S. Harvey*and *T. C.*Harrison, for appellant.

*R. B.*Duncan, *f. S.*Duncan, *N. B. Taylor,*and *E. Taylor,*for appellees.

We hold that no appeal lies in such case as this, and hence that the circuit court had no power to dismiss the petition or case, but should have dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

This question was fully considered in the case of the *Trustees of the Town of Princeton*v. *Manck,*35 Ind. 51, and in *Church*v. *The Town of Knightstown,*35 Ind. *177.*The cases cited in the case of the *Trustees of the Town of Princeton*v. *Manck*leave no doubt in our minds as to the correctness of the ruling. Section 86, above cited, says: “Which shall be conclusive evidence of such annexation in all courts in this State.” The action of the board is conclusive, and, therefore, there is no appeal. The court below erred in dismissing, the petition or case, but should have dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

The judgment of the court below is reversed, with instructions to dismiss the appeal, at the costs of the appellees in this court.
2 t 1

REVISIONS
Na, | ZONE} ECN CHANGE DATE

9.865 — 15 200 375
- .058 |
250 |
$865 H —— — 01.188
1250
2X .260
= .950 4
MATERIAL SPECIFICATION APPROVALS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECFIED NIST CENTER FOR NEUTRON RESEARCH
wea ER ONE TOLERANCES ARE National institute of Standards and Technology oa EN OA
STAINLESS STEEL, TYPE 303 DecMaLs — FRaoTINS — [Technology Administration, U.S. Depariment of Commerce a
SIE Tana Fae 5 [EIST ORE 230 0p 7.018 (G CELL WRENCH
ANOLES 25
CAD DATA ANNOTATION DRAWING DATA | 59 not scaLe DRAWING OF
PART Nae oNE DAE TH ANE FREON
work 8/12/03 4:07 PM Lae cue ev
Sim Larock 08/12/03)" - a @ — 003-1303 -
Fr DATES 12/03 407 PM Or crock 8 12/03 pene Larock ‘SCALE 441 RELEASE DATE. i= “ASSY. = 4
im 83/03 908 AMIN 8718/03. 9:08 AM|TMTM “(300 975-6230 [* orm] DIM. & TOL. PER ANSI Y14.5M-1982

2 I i m8
EXHIBIT 32.2

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Ruby Tuesday, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2016 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 15, 2016, as amended, I, Sue Briley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

| Date: November 21, 2016 |   |   |   | /s/ Sue Briley          |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|                         |   |   |   | Sue Briley              |
|                         |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|                         |   |   |   |                    |
11042.

#### Georgia Mutual Industrial Life and Health Insurance Company *v.*Harris.

Decided May 5, 1920.

Appeal; from Hall superior court-—-Judge J. B. Jones. September 27, 1919.

*C. N. Davis, B. P. Gaillard Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*H. V. Johnson, A. C. Wheeler,*contra.

Stephens, J.

1. The motion for new trial in this case containing only the usual general grounds, and the evidence being sufficient to authorize the inference that the insurance company acted in bad faith, and otherwise supporting the verdict, the judgment of the lower court will not be disturbed.

2. It not being plainly apparent that the writ of error was sued out for delay only, the motion of the defendant in error for damages is denied.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*
11426.

#### Hunter *v.*Staten.

Decided June 15, 1920.

Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial shows cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*

*390Trover; from city court of Valdosta—Judge Cranford. March 5, 1920.

*F. S.*Harrell, for plaintiff in error.

*Dan R. Bruce,*contra.
The Public Safety 

Immersive Test Center

The Public Safety Immersive Test Center 

(PSITC) is a state-of-the-art facility 

designed and built in the spring of 2022 

by the National Institute of Standards 

and Technology’s (NIST) Public Safety 

Communications Research (PSCR) 

Division. The approximately 1,076 

square feet center is located in the 

First Responder Network Authority’s 

Technical Facility in Boulder, Colorado. 

The PSITC serves as a research and 

development facility for purposes 

related to user interface/user experience 

(UI/UX) and indoor location-based 

services (LBS) for PSCR researchers 

and innovators. NIST PSCR and the 

FirstNet Authority have been partnering 

agencies for a decade, focusing 

on furthering the development of 

public safety communications. 

The PSITC is available to first responders 

and private and academic organizations 

[partnered with PSCR and the FirstNet 

Authority] that focus on public safety 

response. These organizations and 

individuals may visit the center to 

receive hands-on experience with 

the technology and conduct related 

research. The center will allow for 

researchers and first responders to 

leverage immersive virtual simulations 

and evaluate technologies that can 

support a variety of situations, such 

as a smoke-filled building, search and 

rescue scenarios, or even terrorist 

attacks. No controllers are required 

for the simulation to enable users to 

organically interact with and pick up 

props, touch walls, furniture, crawl on 

their hands and knees, and more.

The Facility Includes:

A modular layout

A motion capture system 

with 62 high-speed optical 

tracking cameras capable of 

centimeter accuracy

A variety of augmented & 

virtual reality headsets

A mobile staircase and 

other equipment for 

z-axis motion

Physical furniture and 

gear to add a tactile 

component to simulations

10 4k PTZ cameras with 

2 microphone arrays for 

recording 8 simultaneous 

video streams

Technological enhancements 

and updates to the PSITC will 

be made regularly, such as:

• Multiple sensory integrationhaptics and olfaction

• Metrology for assessing 

enhanced user interfaces with 

virtual simulations

• 5G 

• Mobile edge computing

• WebXR capabilities, which allow 

seamless deployment of virtual 

and augmented realities 

• Other technological advances for 

public safety operations

For more information, visit the PSITC webpage on the NIST PSCR website where you can interact with the 

center in the Virtual Lab Tour and read recent press coverage. For any questions or inquiries regarding the 

PSITC, please contact NIST PSCR’s LBS Portfolio Lead Joe Grasso at joseph.grasso@nist.gov or UI/UX Portfolio 

Lead Scott Ledgerwood at scott.ledgerwood@nist.gov.
Exhibit 32(a)

                 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of Jordan
Industries, Inc., an Illinois corporation (the "Registrant"), hereby certifies
that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended
March 31, 2005, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. Section 78m(a)) and that the information contained in the Quarterly
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: December 14, 2005

/s/      John W. Jordan II
------------------------------------
John W. Jordan II
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Time Tuesday September 28 Wednesday September 29 

Se

8:00-8:30 Welcome/Overview Overview 8:30-9:30 Plenary 1: Gregory Dudek Plenary 3: Ken Goldberg Plenary 

9:30-10:00 Coffee Break Coffee Break C

10:00 -12:30 

TUE-AM1: 

Measures and 

Metrics

TUE-AM2: 

Performance 

Metrics for Mixed 

Palletizing 

Operations

WED-AM1: 

Testing and 

Evaluation of 

Intelligent Systems

WED-AM2: 

Evaluation of Human 

Detection and 

Tracking for Robot 

Safety, Collaboration 

and Interaction

THU-AM1: 

Human-Machi

Interaction an

Collaboratio

12:30-14:00 Lunch Lunch 

14:00 - 15:00 Plenary 2: Herman Bruynincks Plenary 4: Jon Bornstein (14:00-16:00

THU-PM1: 

Integrated 

Performance 

Assessment Thr

Experimentati

15:00-15:30 Coffee Break Coffee Break 

15:30 -17:30 

TUE-PM1: 

Interoperability and 

Sustainability

TUE-PM2: 

The Testing of 

Increasingly 

Intelligent Systems

WED-PM: 

Co-X Panel Discussion C

1

(18:30-20:30) 

Reception & Poster Session

 (18:30 – 22:00) 

Banquet (Dinner Cruise)
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28988]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

December 5, 2014.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Thursday, December 18, 2014.

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street 
entrance).

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following in open session: Secretary of Labor v. Small Mine 
Development, Docket Nos. WEST 2011-1351-M, et al. (Issues include 
whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in concluding that a refuge 
must be installed during exploration or development of an ore body when 
the operator decides not to construct a second escapeway.)
    Any person attending this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR Sec.  2706.150(a)(3) and Sec.  2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-
9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sarah L. Stewart,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-28988 Filed 12-5-14; 3:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-P