alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             UT
<CIK>                 0000838868
<NAME>                UPPER PENINSULA ENERGY CORP
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      102,927
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     11,371
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          17,032
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         3,797
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 135,127
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       21,129
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             21,174
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  42,303
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              445
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            43,083
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               9,600
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      253
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  39,443
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  135,127
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       44,992
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             1,684
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      37,712
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      39,396
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          5,596
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 216
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   5,812
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         3,352
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,460
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         17
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    2,443
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         2,844
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,878
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           3,939
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.82
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4807 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4807

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 140 Sacramento Street in Rio Vista, California, as the ``Adam G. 
                     Kinser Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2004

Mr. Ose (for himself, Mr. Cardoza, Mr. Filner, Mr. Sherman, Mr. McKeon, 
Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Matsui, Mr. Pombo, Mr. Herger, Ms. Lee, Ms. Watson, 
  Mr. Gary G. Miller of California, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Rohrabacher, Ms. 
Eshoo, Ms. Millender-McDonald, Mr. Lewis of California, Mr. Royce, Mr. 
 Farr, Mr. Nunes, and Mr. Honda) introduced the following bill; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 140 Sacramento Street in Rio Vista, California, as the ``Adam G. 
                     Kinser Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADAM G. KINSER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 140 Sacramento Street in Rio Vista, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Adam G. Kinser Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Adam G. 
Kinser Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KYLEAF TEAGLE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 644 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of June, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
___________

No. 91-2369

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Western

* District of Missouri.

Samuel L. Dowdy, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: August 11, 1992

 Filed: July 23, 1996

___________

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

BEAM, Circuit Judge.

This matter was remanded to the district court for specific findings,

with jurisdiction retained by the court. The district court has now

certified its findings and has recommended that judgment be entered for the

United States against Mr. Dowdy in the amount of $12,000. We agree.

Accordingly, we reverse the district court judgment in the amount of

$152,173 and remand with directions that the district court enter judgment

against Mr. Dowdy in the amount of $12,000.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TERRY ANN FREDRIKSEN, :

 :

Petitioner. :

 :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION NO.: 09-0342-KD-C

 :

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : CRIMINAL ACTION NO.: 07-0391-KD-C

 :

Respondent. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge dated

February 8, 2010 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED this the 3rd day of March 2010.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cr-00391-KD-N Document 54 Filed 03/03/10 Page 1 of 1
IIB 

Calendar No. 755 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4596 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2004 

Received 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 

Read the first time 

OCTOBER 1, 2004 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To amend Public Law 97–435 to extend the authorization 

for the Secretary of the Interior to release certain conditions contained in a patent concerning certain land conveyed by the United States to Eastern Washington University until December 31, 2009. 
2 

HR 4596 PCS 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAND 

4 TRANSFER AUTHORIZATION EXTENSION. 

5 The first section of Public Law 97–435 (96 Stat. 

6 2281) is amended in subsection (c) by striking ‘‘five years 

7 after the enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘on Decem8 ber 31, 2009’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk. 

Calendar No. 755 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4596 

AN ACT 

To amend Public Law 97–435 to extend the auDecember 31, 2009. States to Eastern Washington University until concerning certain land conveyed by the United release certain conditions contained in a patent thorization for the Secretary of the Interior to 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 

Read the first time
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


                               OCEAN ENERGY, INC.
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          (dollar amounts in thousands)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                              FOR THE SIX
                                                                    YEAR ENDED                                MONTHS ENDED
                                                                    DECEMBER 31,                                JUNE 30,
                                           -----------------------------------------------------------   ---------------------
                                             1993        1994          1995         1996       1997         1997        1998
                                           ---------   ---------    ---------    ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------
<S>                                        <C>         <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>       
Income (loss) before income taxes,
    including extraordinary item           $  10,710   $(189,253)   $   3,816    $  81,215   $  72,312   $  50,082   $(246,488)
                                           ---------   ---------    ---------    ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------

Interest and debt expense                      7,587      13,547       35,565       40,765      49,134      22,741      21,941

Capitalized interest                            --           446        3,882        7,408      12,802       5,001      15,049

Assumed interest portion of rent expense         301         424          519          466         785         434         404

Preferred stock dividends                      2,427        --          2,404        2,480        --          --          --
                                           ---------   ---------    ---------    ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------

Total fixed charges                        $  10,315   $  14,417    $  42,370    $  51,119   $  62,721   $  28,176   $  37,394
                                           ---------   ---------    ---------    ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------

Income (loss) before income taxes
   and interest and debt expense           $  18,297   $(175,706)   $  39,381    $ 121,980   $ 121,446   $  72,823   $(224,547)
                                           ---------   ---------    ---------    ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges               1.8          (1)          (1)         2.4         1.9         2.6          (1)

</TABLE>


   (1) Earnings were not sufficient to cover fixed charges for the indicated
       periods.
Exhibit
32 .1





Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Imagenetix, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William P.
Spencer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
      November 9, 2009
              s/WILLIAM P. SPENCERWilliam
      P. SpencerChief
      Executive Officer and
                President
#### John W. Hazelrigg *v.*Willis Roberts’ Adm’r.

Appeal — Reversal—Finding of Jury.

Tire Court of Appeals will not set aside the finding of a jury, unless it is plainly against the evidence.

APPEAL FROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT.

June 26, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

There is no reason for disturbing the judgment of the court below. The letters written by the appellant to appellee’s intestate and Gallop evidences such a contract as creates a liability upon the rendition of the services. The decedent, Roberts, was requested by the letter of December, 1863, “to proceed to Greenville and aid Mrs. Hoghey in settling up her husband’s business and to aid her in getting to-Kentucky.”

The letter of March 14, 1864, to Gallop says, “that he (the appellant) had procured Roberts to go after Mrs. Hoghey and her family”

Whether of not the services were performed, and their value, were questions for the jury to determine. The issues made by the pleadings have been twice tried and a verdict in each instance rendered for the appellee. This court, as had been repeatedly decided, will not set aside the finding of a jury unless it is palpably against the testimony, and certainly ought not to interfere when the party complaining has had the same issues submitted to a jury the second time. Instruction No. 4 asked by defendant was properly refused, as the *37charge contained in appellant’s counterclaim was sufficiently controverted by the administrator and against the proof. We perceive no objection to any of the other instructions. The only issue in fact was, did the appellee’s intestate render the services. The judgment of the court below is *affirmed.*

*Apperson & Reid, Tenney, Hazelrigg, for appellant.*

*Thomas Turner, C. Brack, for appellee.*
Exhibit 31.1

Certification

I, Glenn M. Dobbs, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Mines Management, Inc.

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 2, 2005

/s/ Glenn M. Dobbs

Glenn M. Dobbs

President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.17 

LEASE AGREEMENT 

        THISLEASE AGREEMENT (the “Lease”) made as of the 1st day of May, 2004, byand between Sterling Realty Trust, a trust made under a Declaration of Trust datedNovember 24, 1950, and recorded in Hampden County Registry of Deeds as Document No. 26882,in Book 2088, Page 123 (the “Landlord”), and Mestek, Inc., and its successorsand assigns (the “Tenant”) a Pennsylvania corporation, with offices at 260 NorthElm Street, Westfield, MA 01085. 

RECITAL 

    A.                 Landlord and Tenant have entered into that certain Lease Agreement dated July 1,          1999, as amended, for the lease on a month-to-month basis of approximately 3,392          square feet on the 3rd and 4th floors of the Torrington          Building for use by Tenant’s Mestek Technology group (“MTI          Lease”); and 

    B.                 Tenant wishes to rent an additional 13,172 square feet on the 2nd and          3rd floors of the Torrington Building for use by Tenant’s Gas          Products group; 

WITNESSETH 

        THATFOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, andintending to be legally bound, the parties hereto do hereby covenant and agree as follows: 

1.              Lease of Premises. Landlord hereby leases to Tenant and Tenant hereby          leases from Landlord all of the 2nd floor, and a portion of the 3rd          Floor, and a portion of the 4th floor of the premises commonly known          as 125 North Elm Street (“Torrington Building”), Westfield,          Massachusetts, 01085, representing 16,564 square feet, as indicated by the          drawings attached as **Exhibit A** to this Lease (the “Premises”),          which Premises is situated on that certain parcel of land described in          **Exhibit B** to this Lease (the “Property”), together with the          right and license to use the halls, lobbies, elevators, sidewalks, parking areas          and all other common areas of the Property, including the right to enter and use          the adjacent property located on the corner of North Elm Street and Westminster          Street as described in **Exhibit C**to this Lease, for the purposes of          automobile parking for Tenant, its officers, employees, agents and invitees.          This Lease supersedes the MTI Lease and incorporates the space previously leased          thereunder, and the MTI Lease is hereby terminated. 

2. Term
EXHIBIT 4.47


 


Deed of access, indemnity and
insurance – Mr G Malcolm Williamson


 


The
Deed of access, indemnity and insurance of Mr G Malcolm Williamson is
incorporated by reference to National Australia Bank Limited’s Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Commission on January 20, 2005
COMMERCIALIZATION

OPPORTUNITY

Optofluidic Flow Meter

Patent Number: 10,151,681; Ref. No. 16-026

NEW ENABLING TECHNOLOGY

Optofluidics is the marriage of microfluidics and optical technology. The NIST Optical Flow Meter (US Patent 10,151,681) 

provides on chip assessment of flow and heat transfer resulting in vast improvements in fluid metrology and advances in 

biological sensing.

PLACING PRESSURE SENSORS INTO 

MICROFLUIDIC CHIP IS A MOST FOR ACCURATE IN 

SITU PRESSURE MEASUREMENT.

BETTER

FASTER

EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGY

Pressure measurements still rely on external pressure 

transducers. The problem is one cannot accurately 

measure the local pressure in a microfluidic system due 

to the pressure dissipation and delay in transmission. The 

NIST Optical Flow Meter provides on-chip assessment of 

flow and heat transfer which enables improvement in fluid 

metrology AND paves the way for new opportunities in 

microscale calorimetry and biological sensing.

OptoFluidic Flow Meter

CONTACT

Technology Partnership Office (TPO)

100 Bureau Drive

Gaithersburg MD 20899

TPO@NIST.GOV

▶ Flow measurement at 10 nL/min with 5% uncertainty

using dosage relationship to scale down existing flow

calibration by approximately a factor of 10 (calibrated

meter at 150 nL/min).

▶ Flow control to within 5 % uncertainty down to 1 nL/min
NOW ACCURATE MEASUREMENT OF CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL 

PROPERTIES OF FLUIDS IN MICROLITER VOLUMES IS AVAILABLE

▶ Point of Care 

Diagnostics

▶ Flow Cytometry

▶ Microfluidic Drug 

Administration at 

the Cellular Level

▶ Cell Counting

▶ Live Cell Imaging

COST EFFECTIVE

AND EASY TO USE

THE SOLUTION FOR A HOST

OF ISSUES THAT PLAGUE MULTIPLE 

INDUSTRIES

1. Makes precise measurements of smaller quantities in 

real time.

2. New strategy to accurately determine measurement 

uncertainty near zero flow – useful for flow control and 

determination of fluidic conductance. 

MARKET

Provides measurement of microscale forces pressures for a 

fluid carrying article

PARTNERSHIPS

Cooperative Research and Development

Agreements (CRADAs), Patent License

Agreements (PLAs) Abound

Environmental monitoring, energy production and 

harvesting, biomedical applications, defense, public safety, 

inkjet printing and chemical analysis.

Opportunity for multiple collaborative 

development relationships with 

research and development. There is 

an opportunity for collaboration with 

fabrication facilities!

OptoFluidic Flow Meter

CONTACT

DON ARCHER

Licensing Specialist NIST

100 Bureau Drive

Gaithersburg MD 20899

301-975-3522

donald.archer@nist.gov
Presentation to the

NIST Blue Ribbon Commiss

Management and Safe

U.S. Department of Comm

Office of Inspector Gene

October 6, 2008

Boulder, CO
OIG Review of NIST 

• Deputy Secretary requested an independent OIG 

determine whether

– “NIST has established proper training, safety and r– “NIST’s management structure facilitates its ability 

preparedness and response.”

• OIG had an ongoing survey of NIST hazardous m

and procedures in Gaithersburg when the plutoni

• Since the plutonium spill

– Commerce OIG staff working with NRC– Reviewed reports from internal and external review– Meetings with

• NIST senior management• Safety and security personnel in Boulder and Gaithe• Researchers in Boulder and Gaithersburg• Other radioactive materials licensees
• 5 independent radiation health and 

experts

• NIST’s initial report on the plutonium 

time line of events

• NIST Ionizing Radiation Safety Com• U.S. Department of Energy review• Common themes point to an absen

culture at NIST

Reports on Internal and 

Reviews
• 4 federal, 4 nonfederal• Observed differences between other licen

Boulder

– Powdered plutonium sources– Broad scope vs. special nuclear materials lice– Permitting systems for radioactive materials w– Analysis of facilities needs prior to initiating ra

work

– Coordination and information exchange amon– Use of automated systems to control hazardo

acquisitions, use, and training

– Protocols for safe handling of radioactive mat

Visits to Other Licen
• Approval process for acquisition of 

materials

• Dedicated radiation vs. general pur

laboratories

• Scope of existing radioactive mater• Role of IRSC• Duties of radiation safety officer

Observed Differences B

Boulder and Gaithers
• Examine the extent to which NIST's 

model may impact safety at NIST la

– How does NIST prioritize use of resou– How are safety budgets developed?– How are safety resources allocated to 

units?

– To what extent does NIST rely on exte

sources to maintain staffing and activi

– Do externally-funded projects recover 

shares of safety costs?

Current Focus