alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To: cyberframework 

Cc

Subject: Comments on Discussion Draft of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 Core 

Date: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 10:10:13 AM 

I have the following suggestions: 

1. ID.AM - please add some guidance about inventories for virtual resources in the cloud, 

e.g., Virtual machines, Kubernetes clusters etc. They are obviously not physical assets 

and can be very short lived, so I assume that they should be considered as software and 

covered under ID.AM-02. It would be helpful to have this explicitly stated to avoid 

ambiguity. 

2. PR.AT - add a subcategory for software developers, while they could be considered 

users with elevated privileges, they are really a separate category that should be trained 

on how to create secure applications which is different that managing/operating the 

applications securely. 

3. GV.PO-02 - I don't think that it is realistic to apply the same policies to suppliers as to 

internal resources. We can't control what our suppliers do with their computers. This 

needs to be reworded to something that can actually be accomplished. 

DEAN GROSS | Identity and Security Architect | Consulting 

insight.com 

Security threats are evolving. 

Your strategy should be, too. 

Upcoming Time Off: None Scheduled
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
The Board of Directors
Verio Inc.:
 
     We consent to the use of our reports included herein and to the reference
to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus.
 
                                                /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
 
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                   KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Denver, Colorado
   
December 14, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1998
<CASH>                                          10,363
<SECURITIES>                                     4,507
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,667
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,511
<PP&E>                                         152,369
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 165,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,643
<BONDS>                                         12,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           130
<OTHER-SE>                                     136,537
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   165,272
<SALES>                                         38,917
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,917
<CGS>                                            7,630
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,599
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (291)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,609
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,743
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,866
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,866
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in (1) the Registration  Statement
on Form S-8, File No.  333-43837,  (2) the  Registration  Statement on Form S-8,
File  No.  333-43839,  (3) the  Registration  Statement  on Form  S-8,  File No.
333-72939 and (4) the Registration  Statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-81037 of
our report dated  February 14, 2001 on our audit of the  consolidated  financial
statements of Siebert Financial Corp. and subsidiaries  ("Siebert")  included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Siebert for the year ended December 31, 2000.


/s/ Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP

New York, New York
March 28, 2001
FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

---o0o---

MAKILA LAND CO., LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs.

HEIRS OR ASSIGNS OF APAA (k), et al., Defendants-Appellees

CAAP-17-0000803

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 02-1-0107(2))

AUGUST 25, 2020

FUJISE, PRESIDING JUDGE, LEONARD AND CHAN, JJ.

ORDER OF CORRECTION

(By: Leonard, J.)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion of the court,

filed on April 6, 2020, is hereby corrected as follows:

At page 2, line 2 from bottom replace "Samual" with

"Samuel" so that the sentence now reads as follows:

precinct[.]" Mary Kawena Pukui & Samuel H.

Elbert, Hawaiian Dictionary 28

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000803

25-AUG-2020

01:38 PM
FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

At page 24, line 6 from top replace "Keawa" with

"Keawe" so that the sentence now reads as follows:

Keawe Haia, Jr., passed away without any

living

At page 28, line 7 from top replace "the" with "that"

so that the sentence now reads as follows:

Specifically, Makila Land asserted that Kapu

did not present

At page 28, line 9 from top replace "Keawa" with

"Keawe" so that the sentence now reads as follows:

Keawe Haia, Jr., or Haia Kekai exercised

ownership in any way,

At page 43, line 11 from top insert the word "to" after

the word "relating" so that the sentence now reads as follows:

evidence to establish the relevance of

probate documents relating to

The clerk of the court is directed to incorporate the

foregoing change in the original opinion and take all necessary

steps to notify the publishing agencies of this change.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 25, 2020.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Associate Judge

2
#### Thomas A. REDD, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

No. 01-3016.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: May 11, 2001.

*811Before MAYER, Chief Judge, MICHEL and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
10932.

#### Bush *v.*The State.

Decided December 9, 1919.

Indictment for murder; from Terrell superior court—Judge Worrill. September 1, 1919.

*B. B. Jones,*for plaintiff in error.

*B.*T. *Oastellow, solicitor-general, B. B. Arnold,*contra.

Beoyles, O. J.

1. Under the facts of the case, the excerpt from the charge of the court excepted to in the first special ground of the motion for a new trial contains no reversible error.

2. In the absence of a timely and appropriate written request, the judjje did not err in failing to charge section 73 of the Penal Code (1910), he having fully instructed the jury upon the law of justifiable homicide, including the doctrine of reasonable fears.

3. The jury having returned a verdict of voluntary manslaughter, it is unnecessary to decide whether the excerpt from the charge of the court upon the law of murder, excepted to, was inaccurate.

4. The charge upon the law of voluntary manslaughter, including the theory of a mutual intent to fight, was authorized by the evidence.

5. The 5th special ground of the motion for a new trial complains of the following excerpt from the charge of the court: “Should you believe at the time of the altercation between the deceased and the defendant that led up to or terminated in the death of the deceased that the defendant was armed with a gun.” This isolated fragment of a sentence from the charge of the court is too incomplete to be considered.

6. The remaining special ground of the motion for a new trial is too general and indefinite to raise any question for the consideration of this court.

7. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,664
<SECURITIES>                                   327,083
<RECEIVABLES>                                  584,629
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,050
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          48,679
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,165
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,252,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        288,346
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     18,291
<COMMON>                                           218
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,349
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,252,933
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               170,313
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               137,981
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                14,889
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,691)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,093)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,598)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,601)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (103,006)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (103,006)


</TABLE>
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Allen C. Bender, Individually and :

as Executor of the Estate of :

Ruth A. Bender, :

Appellant :

:

v. : No. 77 C.D. 2019

:

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, :

Department of Transportation, :

Township of Swatara, and :

Adrian T. Horrell :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, August 7, 2020

, having considered Appellant’s application for

re consideration , the application is denied.
<Page>

                                                               Exhibit 10(a)(3)

                                 THIRD AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                              UTILICORP UNITED INC.
                            1986 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

     This Amendment is adopted as of November 6, 2001, by UtiliCorp United Inc.
(the "Company").

     WHEREAS, the Company maintains the UtiliCorp United Inc. 1986 Stock
Incentive Plan (the "Plan") as amended and restated effective as of August 4,
1998, to enable qualified executive, managerial, supervisory and professional
personnel of the Company and its affiliates to acquire and hold an ownership in
the common stock of the Company;

     WHEREAS, the Plan was amended on two occasions prior to the date hereof;
and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to further amend the Plan to authorize the
issuance of share-based awards.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

A.   Section 2.12 is amended to read as follows:

     "Restricted Stock Award" means the grant of a specified number of Shares,
     or share-based units entitling a Grantee to payment in cash or in Shares,
     at a time or times fixed by the Committee in accordance with the Plan and
     subject to such limitations and restrictions as the Plan and Committee
     shall impose, all as expressed in the written instrument evidencing the
     Restricted Stock Award.

B.   This Amendment is effective as of November 6, 2001.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed as of the day and year first
written above.


                                       UTILICORP UNITED INC.
                                       "Company"



                                       By: /s/ Herman Cain
                                           -------------------------------------
                                       Title: Chairman of Compensation Committee
                                              ----------------------------------
Exhibit 12

QWEST CORPORATION  CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES  (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

|                                                                                                                     |                                      | Years Ended December 31, |      
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------ | ------------------------ | -----
|
|Income from continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle effect |                                      | $                        | 1,742
|Add fixed charges                                                                                                    |                                      |                          | 647  
|Add amortization of capitalized interest                                                                             |                                      |                          | 10   
|Less interest capitalized                                                                                            |                                      |                          | (9   
|                                                                                                                     | Earnings available for fixed charges |                          |      
|Interest expense, including amortization of premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs                              |                                      |                          | 584  
|Interest capitalized                                                                                                 |                                      |                          | 9    
|Interest factor on rentals                                                                                           |                                      |                          | 54   
|                                                                                                                     | Fixed charges                        |                          | $    
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                                                   |                                      |                          | 3.7  

Until
May 1, 2004, Qwest Corporation provided wireless services through its wholly owned subsidiary, Qwest Wireless LLC ("Qwest Wireless"). On May 1, 2004, we transferred
ownership of Qwest Wireless to an affiliate. As a consequence, we no longer have wireless operations, and the results of operations and the financial position of Qwest Wireless have been reclassified
in our consolidated financial statements to be included in discontinued operations. Amounts shown in this schedule have also been revised to conform to the current presentation of our consolidated
financial statements.

---



QuickLinks
Quantum Entangled Images 

We have developed a technique for generating non-classical light by 4-wave mixing in atomic vapors. We 

have generated “twin beams” of light that are more closely correlated than for any classical sources. One 

particularly useful feature of this technique is that the non-classical light can easily be made in multiple 

spatial modes. That is, images with quantum correlations can be produced. Pixel-by-pixel, the light in 

these pairs of images is correlated to levels better than the shot noise for the photon numbers involved. 

Light in the corresponding pixels is not just correlated in intensity, but also in phase. The intensitydifference and the phase-sum are quadrature variables displaying quantum entanglement at levels that 

violate the inequality expressing the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Measurements showing such 

entanglement were reported in 2009. 

Quantum-correlated and entangled images might be used for faint-object detection (a small absorption or 

scattering from one of the beams, even at a level below the shot noise, can be detected in the difference 

between the beams). Another future use of such images is in information storage. The parallel storage of 

quantum information in images has not yet been demonstrated, however, we have taken the first steps in 

that direction with the “slowing” of quantum images. A vapor cell with a dispersion (change of index with 

frequency) can display a large group index, which corresponds to a very small pulse velocity in the 

medium. We have demonstrated the slowing and delay of continuous beams carrying quantum-correlated 

images, while preserving the quantum correlations, for times of 20 -30 ns. Future work will pursue 

stopping, holding, and releasing pulses of light carrying images in a quantum memory configuration. 

Figure 3.3: Composite of quantum-correlated images indicating approximate regions of quantum 

correlations between the “twin” images. The pair of images is created by sending a seed image through an 

atomic vapor cell in which the 4-wave mixing process amplifies the seed and also generates the twin image. 

Contact: Dr. Paul Lett 

(301) 975-6559 

paul.lett@nist.gov
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Copies of the agreements are available through the Commission's Web site (                    *www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     012308.                

*Title:*                     MOL/CMA CGM Japan/USWC Slot Charter Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     CMA CGM, S.A. and Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.                

*Filing Party:*                     Draughn B. Arbona, Senior Counsel; CMA CGM (America) LLC; 5701 Lake Wright Drive; Norfolk, VA 23502.                

*Synopsis:*                     The agreement would authorizes CMA CGM to charter space from MOL between ports on the West Coast of the United States, and Japan.                

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: December 5, 2014.

Rachel E. Dickon, 

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-28893 Filed 12-9-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

                                  MICROPAC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                             CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Micropac  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  November 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Connie Wood,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


 /s/ Connie Wood
------------------------------
Connie Wood, President and CEO
(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT
      32.2






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Magnitude Information Systems, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Form
      10-QSB”), I, Joerg H. Klaube, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
      my **** knowledge,
      that the Company’s Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Form 10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: November 19, 2007
            
            
            /s/ Joerg
              H.
              KlaubeJoerg
              H. Klaube, Chief Financial Officer