alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.B
CERTIFICATION
I, Terry L. Troupe, certify, that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mercantile BanksharesCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
      (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;       (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and       (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of any annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
      (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and       (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date: March 9, 2004      /s/ Terry L. Troupe Terry L. Troupe Chief Financial Officer
Summary of director compensation



 Exhibit 10(v) 
  
 Alberto-Culver Company 
 Summary of Director Compensation 
  
 Each non-employee director receives an annual retainer of $40,000. Non-employee directors receive $1,500 for each meeting of the Board of Directors and each meeting of the Audit Committee, Compensation and Leadership Development Committee
and Nominating/Governance Committee attended and $750 for each such committee conference call meeting attended. The chairman of each of the Audit Committee, Compensation and Leadership Development Committee and Nominating/Governance Committee
receives an additional annual retainer of $7,500. Employee directors receive no additional compensation for serving on the Board of Directors or its committees.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70913-70914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28045]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8957]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Islamic Galleries''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Islamic Galleries,'' imported from abroad 
for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Art Institute of Chicago, 
Chicago, Illinois, from on or about December 18, 2014, until on or 
about November 17, 2017, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.


[[Page 70914]]


    Dated: November 18, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-28045 Filed 11-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Exhibit 10.17
                                                                         Summary

Summary of Loan  Agreement by and between  Shenzhen BAK Battery Co.,  Ltd.  (the
"Company") and Agricultural Bank dated December 5, 2005.

Main contents
>>    Contract No. (Shenzhen Longgang) Nong Yin Jie Zi (81101200500001837)
>>    Loan Amount (RMB) 15 million yuan
>>    Contract Term December 5, 2005 ~ June 5, 2006
>>    Interest rate: fixed rate of 5.22%;
            |X|   Penalty  interest rate for delayed  repayment:  5.22% plus 50%
                  *5.22%;
            |X|   Penalty interest rate for embezzlement of loan proceeds: 5.22%
                  *2;
>>    Purpose of the loan is to provide  working  capital for the Company to buy
      raw material;
>>    Advanced repayment of loan needs to be approved by the Lender;
>>    Breach  of  contract  penalties:  suspension  of loan  unprovided,  demand
      prepayment of loan principal and interest before  maturity;  imposition of
      punitive interest;  compensation for the Lender's expenses incurred due to
      the Company's breach of contract such as lawyer's fee, travel cost in case
      of litigation, etc.
>>    The Loan agreement is under  Comprehensive  Credit  Facility  Agreement Of
      Maximum Amount entered between the Company and Agricultural Bank (Shenzhen
      Longgang Nongyin Shouzi No.200502370001;
>>    The loan  agreement is guaranteed by Guaranty  Contract of Maximum  Amount
      entered between BAK HK and  Agricultural  Bank (Shenzhen  Longgang Nongyin
      Gaobaozi  81905200500000068)  and  Guaranty  Contract  of  Maximum  Amount
      entered  between Li Xiangqian and  Agricultural  Bank  (Shenzhen  Longgang
      Nongyin Gaobaozi 200502379999).

Summary of the articles omitted
>>    Types of the loan
>>    Clearing of the loan interest
>>    Condition precedent to drawing of the loan
>>    Rights and obligations of the borrower
>>    Rights and obligations of the lender
>>    Guarantee of the loan
>>    Dispute settlement
>>    Miscellaneous
>>    Validity
>>    Notes
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4582 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to suspend the running of 

periods of limitation for credit or refund of overpayment of Federal 

income tax by veterans while their service-connected compensation determinations are pending with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2004 

Mr. PLATTS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to suspend 

the running of periods of limitation for credit or refund 

of overpayment of Federal income tax by veterans while 

their service-connected compensation determinations are 

pending with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RUNNING OF PERIODS OF LIMITATION SUS4 PENDED PENDING SERVICE-CONNECTED 

5 COMPENSATION DETERMINATIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6511 of the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 (relating to limitation on credit or re-
2 

•HR 4582 IH 

1 fund) is amended by redesignating subsection (i) as sub2 section (j) and by inserting after subsection (h) the fol3 lowing new subsection: 

4 ‘‘(i) RUNNING OF PERIODS OF LIMITATION SUS5 PENDED PENDING SERVICE-CONNECTED COMPENSATION

6 DETERMINATIONS.—If the claim for credit or refund of 

7 any tax imposed by subtitle A relates to an overpayment 

8 attributable to the determination by the Secretary of Vet9 erans Affairs that an individual is entitled to compensa10 tion under chapter 11 of title 38, United States Code, the 

11 running of the periods specified in subsections (a), (b), 

12 and (c) with respect to the individual shall be suspended 

13 during the period beginning on the date the individual 

14 submits a claim for such compensation and ending on the 

15 date of the determination by the Secretary of Veterans 

16 Affairs.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall apply with respect to submissions 

20 of claims for compensation under chapter 11 of title 

21 38, United States Code, after December 31, 1995. 

22 (2) WAIVER OF LIMITATIONS.— 

23 (A) IN GENERAL.—If the credit or refund 

24 of any overpayment of tax resulting from a de25 termination described in subparagraph (B) is 
3 

•HR 4582 IH 

1 prevented at any time by the operation of any 

2 law or rule of law (including res judicata), such 

3 credit or refund may nevertheless be allowed or 

4 made if the claim therefor is filed before the 

5 close of the 1-year period beginning on the date 

6 of the enactment of this Act. 

7 (B) DETERMINATION DESCRIBED.—A de8 termination is described in this subparagraph if 

9 the determination is made by the Secretary of 

10 Veterans Affairs under chapter 11 of title 38, 

11 United States Code, after December 31, 1995. 

Æ
Exhibit
32 .1





Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Imagenetix, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William P. Spencer,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated: August 10, 2009
              s/WILLIAM P. SPENCERWilliam
      P. SpencerChief
      Executive Officer and
President




EX-4
No. 86-203.

No. 86-208.

#### Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. *v.*Moldovan et al., as Trustees for the Tri-State UFCW and Employers Benefit Fund; and Moldovan et al., as Trustees for the Tri-State UFCW and Employers Benefit Fund *v.*Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.1



 



Exhibit 10.1











		
	 	
    November 22, 2005





Ms. Gwen Manto 

 675 Dunbarton Drive 

 Barrington, IL 60010



Dear Gwen:


I am pleased to confirm our offer of employment for the position
of Executive Vice President & Chief Merchandising Officer
reporting to Ed Stack, Chairman & CEO with a targeted start
date to be determined. The position is located in our Corporate
Headquarters in Pittsburgh, PA. The details of our offer are as
follows:



You will receive a gross
annual salary of $600,000 paid biweekly
in the amount of $23,076.93. You are eligible to participate in
Dick’s Sporting Goods’ discretionary management bonus
plan. Any bonus would be paid in first quarter 2007. The range
of participation is 0% to 150% of salary with a target of 75%.
In addition, you will receive a signing bonus in two
installments. The first installment of $100,000 will be paid
immediately after the start of employment. The second
installment of $285,000 will be paid on or about
February 15, 2006. If you voluntarily terminate your
employment within one-year of your employment date, you will be
required to pay back the $385,000 to the Company.


In order to cover the unvested Restricted Stock Units that you
will forfeit, we will pay the actual value of 5,000 units of
Sears Holding to you on or about February 15, 2006. We will
then pay to you the value of 3,000 units at the actual value of
Sears Holding, with a minimum value of $60 per unit and a
maximum value of $150 per unit on or about February 15,
2007.


You will receive an initial stock option grant of 75,000 shares,
cliff vested at three (3) years from date of employment.
You will also be eligible to participate thereafter annually at
a grant level established by the Board of Directors. All grants
are subject to approval by the Board of Directors.


As a full-time salaried associate, you are eligible to
participate in the full range of benefits, including health and
welfare plans, medical and dental, life and disability insurance
as well as a 401K plan. A summary benefits brochure is included
with this letter and a more detailed explanation of our benefits
will be provided during corporate orientation on your first day.
Dick’s will also provide you with relocation benefits in
accordance with our relocation policy. A copy of the relocation
policy is enclosed.


This offer is contingent upon a satisfactory background check and
your review and acceptance of our Non Compete Agreement for New
Employees and Policy on Insider Trading. These documents are
enclosed and will need to be executed and forwarded to my
attention prior to your start date.









 






Gwen, we believe that you are capable of making an outstanding contribution to our
company and that we can offer you a challenging and rewarding career at Dick’s. I hope
you will favorably consider this offer and decide to join us here at Dick’s Sporting
Goods. Please contact me if you have any questions.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,

 	 
	 	/s/ Edward W. Stack
 	 
	 	Edward W. Stack 	 
	 	Chairman & CEO
	 
	 
	 	/s/ Gwen Manto
	 	Gwen Manto 	 
	 
	 	Date of Acceptance:   November 28, 2005   
   	 




2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 8, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40471

Summary Calendar

 

JAVIER CHAPA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DAVID STACKS, Individually and in his official capacity as

Warden; RICHARD ALFORD, Individually and in his official

capacity; ARMANDO ALANIZ, Individually and in his official

capacity; CHARLES R CLARK, Individual Capacity; HAZEL KITCHEN, 

In her individual capacity; DENNIS CROWLEY, Lieutenant,

Individual capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:02-CV-241

--------------------

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Javier Chapa, Texas prisoner # 904219, appeals the dismissal

as frivolous and for failure to state a claim of his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 suit against Warden David Stacks and five correctional

officers alleging that they violated his due-process rights by
No. 03-40471

-2-

placing him in administrative segregation for being a gang

member. Chapa argues that he has a protectable interest in his

custodial classification because there has been an atypical,

significant deprivation. 

Although he alleges the existence of extraordinary

circumstances, he has not shown any, and Chapa’s placement in

administrative segregation, without more, does not constitute a

deprivation of a constitutionally cognizable liberty interest. 

See Lukin v. Scott, 71 F.3d 192, 193 (5th Cir. 1995).

Chapa also argues that the district court’s decision is not

supported by evidence because he did not sign the self-admission

form and that the district court erred in considering certain

photographs. “Because [Chapa] relies on a legally nonexistent

interest, any alleged due process or other constitutional

violation arising from his classification is indisputably

meritless.” Harper v. Showers, 174 F.3d 716, 719 (5th Cir.

1999). 

Finally, Chapa’s argument that the district court improperly

denied him the opportunity to bring witnesses lacks merit. The

district court sufficiently developed the facts. See Parker v.

Carpenter, 978 F.2d 190, 192 & n.2 (5th Cir. 1993). The district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 

The district court’s dismissal of Chapa’s complaint counts

as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v.

Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Chapa is
No. 03-40471

-3-

cautioned that if he accumulates three strikes, he will no longer

be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or

appeal filed while he is detained or incarcerated in any facility

unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

AFFIRMED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
#### Louis Cauffield and Elizabeth Cauffield v. Continental Insurance Company.

*Insmance*— Instalment *notes*— Default *in payments.*

An insurance policy purporting to be for five years stipulated that the company might at any time cancel it on returning the unexpired premium *pro rata,*and permitting the assured to have it cancelled on paying the customary short rate for the period expired; it also provided that in case of loss the company might deduct any note or instalment thereof given as a consideration for the policy. An instalment note given on the policy provided that in case of the non-payment of any instalment at maturity, the policy should be void until revived, and the whole amount of instalments remaining unpaid on said policy should be considered earned. *Reid,*that these provisions distinguished the policy from one under which there was no absolute insurance for the whole period for which it was taken.

Error to Branch.

Submitted Jan. 5.

Decided Jan. 18.

Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

Affirmed.

*Andrew J. McGowan*for plaintiffs in error.

*Zovericlge c& Barlow*for defendants in error.

Marston, J.

The plaintiff in error insists that this case resembles and is governed by *American Ins. Co. v. Stoy*41 *448Mich. 385, while the defendant relies upon *Williams v. Albany City Ins. Co.*19 Mich. 451, in support of the judgment recovered in the court below.

*We*have very carefully examined this case and those referred to and are of opinion that the present more closely resembles and is governed by the case in 19 Mich. The application in this case is “ for the term of five years from the first day of March, 1878,” and there is nothing therein tending in any way to change or modify this clause or inconsistent therewith.

The instalment note given provides that in case of the non-payment of any of the instalments at maturity, the policy for which this note was given shall cease and be void until revived, etc., and the whole amount of instalments remaining unpaid on said policy shall be considered as earned.

The policy contains a clause that the company may at any time cancel the policy, returning the unexpired premium *fro*rata, and that the assured may at any time have the policy cancelled by paying the customary short rates for the expired time of full term; and farther provides that in case of any loss thereunder the company may deduct any note or instalment thereof given as a consideration for the policy. I do not refer to the other provisions which speak of the policy as being one for five years, as they are but like those in the case first above referred to. The above provisions-however are unlike the provisions contained in the American Insurance Company’s policy, note and application, and which had a controlling effect in determining that the insurance in that case was not one unconditional for five years. The distinctions are apparent and need not be specifically pointed out.

Judgment affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.