alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NIST IoT for Cybersecurity Program

IoT Definitions

January 2023
Selected Definitions

• IoT Device from NIST IR 8259 and P.L. 116-207, IoT Cybersecurity 

Improvement Act of 2020 

• IoT System from NIST IR 8316

• IoT Component from NIST IR 8316

• IoT Environment from NIST IR 8316

• IoT Product from NIST IR 8425
There are many definitions for IoT, 

so we picked one and moved on

NIST IR 8259 uses this definition

At least one transducer for interacting 

directly with the physical world

(e.g., a sensor or actuator)

& 

At least one network interface for 

interfacing with the digital world

(e.g., Ethernet, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Long-Term Evolution 

[LTE], Zigbee, Ultra-Wideband [UWB]) 

This definition is used in U.S. 

Public Law 116-207, IoT 

Cybersecurity Improvement Act 

of 2020 
IoT Working Definitions: Devices & Products

An IoT device has...

At least one transducer for interacting directly with the physical world

(e.g., a sensor or actuator) 

& 

At least one network interface for interfacing with the digital world 

(e.g., Ethernet, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Long-Term Evolution [LTE], Zigbee, UltraWideband [UWB]) 

An IoT product is an IoT device and any additional product 

components that are necessary to using the IoT device beyond 

basic operational features.
Terminology

• Source: NIST IR 8316 Internet of Things (IoT) Component Capability 

Model for Research Testbed (https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8316)

• 3.2.1: IoT Component: Basic building blocks of IoT Systems; interact 

with other IoT components to form systems; have at least one 

network interface; if has sensing / actuating capabilities, then an IoT 

Device

• 3.2.2: IoT System: Composed of networked IoT components; must 

interact with a physical entity of interest via sensors and/or actuators

• 3.2.3: IoT Environment: set of available IoT components; connecting 

networks; any associated services that provide the mechanisms for 

discovery, composition, and orchestration

NIST IR 8425
IR 8425 Consumer Profile, Overview

Profile of the IoT Core Baseline for Consumer IoT Products (September 2022)

Product 

Definition

• Defines Consumer IoT product scope:

• IoT Device(s), plus any mix of:

• Specialty hardware (e.g., gateway)

• Companion applications (e.g., mobile app)

• Backend support (e.g., cloud services)

• Profiles IR 8259A/B Core Baselines

• Provides supporting information regarding 

source materials, common IoT vulnerabilities, 

insights & takeaways from profiling process 

NIST IR 8425
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITS QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          42,681
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  551,076<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,470<F2>
<INVENTORY>                                     57,555
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               694,151
<PP&E>                                       1,846,499
<DEPRECIATION>                                 651,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,468,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          379,672
<BONDS>                                        845,886
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,601     
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,055,967
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,468,824
<SALES>                                      2,439,115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,448,871
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,192,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                81,489
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F3>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,303
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                110,944
<INCOME-TAX>                                    44,378
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             66,566
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    66,566
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66
<FN>
<F1>Excludes $30,258 of long-term notes receivable.
<F2>Excludes $4,430 of allowance for long-term notes receivable.
<F3>Included in Total costs and expenses line.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATIONS
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
quarterly report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers first fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 14, 2008/s/ Akio Ariura

Akio AriuraChief Financial Officer
 7
Please Note..

This webinar and the engagement tools will be recorded.

An archive will be available on the event website. 
Cybersecurity Apprenticeship 

Programs that Incorporate an 

Academic Degree

November 15, 2023
Richard 

Costello 

Jessica 

Randall

Abigail 

Allen

Jeffrey 

Richmond
Q&A
Submit an event survey!

www.surveymonkey.com/r/Nov2023NICEWebinar
NICE Webinar Series

Cybersecurity Workforce Outlook for 2024:

Impact of Changing Demographics

January 17, 2024, 2:00-3:00PM ET

nist.gov/nice/webinars 6
EXHIBIT 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


     The undersigned directors of Michigan Financial Corporation, a Michigan
corporation, hereby constitute and appoint Howard L. Cohodas and Kenneth F.
Beck, and each of them, the true and lawful agents and attorneys-in-fact of the
undersigned, with full power and authority in said agents and attorneys-in-fact,
and any one or more of them, to sign for the undersigned and in their respective
names as directors of Michigan Financial Corporation, the Form l0-K Annual
Report to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington,
D.C., pursuant to Section l3 or l5 (d) of the Securities Act of l934 for the
fiscal year ended December 3l, l997.



Dated  January 19, 1998       /s/ GARY L. BUTRYN
                              -------------------------------------
                              Gary L. Butryn


Dated  January 19, 1998       /s/ WILLARD M. CARNE
                              -------------------------------------
                              Willard M. Carne


Dated  January 19, 1998       /s/ WILLARD L. COHODAS
                              -------------------------------------
                              Willard L. Cohodas


Dated  January 19, 1998       /s/ CLARENCE R. FISHER
                              -------------------------------------
                              Clarence R. Fisher


Dated  January 19, 1998       /s/ HUGH C. HIGLEY, JR
                              -------------------------------------
                              Hugh C. Higley, Jr.


Dated  January 19, 1998       /s/ DAVID HOLLI
                              -------------------------------------
                              David Holli

<PAGE>


Dated  January 19, 1998       /s/ DANIEL H. LORI
                              -------------------------------------
                              Daniel H. Lori


Dated  January 19, 1998       /s/ WAYNE L. NASI
                              -------------------------------------
                              Wayne L. Nasi


Dated  January 19, 1998       /s/ FRED M. SAIGH
                              -------------------------------------
                              Fred M. Saigh


Dated  January 19, 1998       /s/ JAMES L. SMITH
                              -------------------------------------
                              James L. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk July 24, 2012

s0716 

# Order

July 24, 2012

144904

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144904

COA: 300509

Grand Traverse CC:

09

- 010952

- FC

DANNY ROY SCHNEIDER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 14, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
10467.

#### Metcalf *v.*Peoples Grocery Co.

Luke, J.

Non-residence of a plaintiff who submits himself to the jurisdiction of the courts of this State affords equitable ground for the filing by the defendant of a plea of set-off. See *Hecht*v. *Snook & Austin Co.,*114 *Ga.*921 (41 S. E. 74), and eit.

*(а) In a*suit by an individual upon an open account due him the debtor cannot set off a claim due by a corporation or partnership of which the individual creditor is a member. The cross-demand lacks mutuality. Civil Code (1910), §§ 4340, 4341, 5668. It is well settled that a debt due by a partnership cannot be set off against a debt due by a third person to one of the firm. The firm and its individual members are different contractors; each is, in the eye of the law, a separate person. The rule is not different in equity. See *West*v. *Kendrick,*46 *Ga.*527; *Kinard*v. *Sanford,*64 *Ga.*630-632 (2); *Dalton City Council*v. *Dalton Manufacturing Co.,*33 *Ga.*243.

(б) The mere fact that the plaintiff and the partnership debtor of the de*664fendant are non-residents does not amount to such a “special equitable circumstance” as will take the case out of the general rule and authorize an equitable set-off. See *Ingram*v. *Jordan,*55 *Ga.*357 (4).

Decided January 7, 1920.

Complaint; from Crisp superior court—Judge Gower. February 8, 1919.

*E. F. Strozier,*for plaintiff. *M. M. Ealces,*for defendant.

2. D. D. Metcalf, trading as Metcalf Manufacturing Company, sued the Peoples Grocery Company on an opon account. The defendant answered, among other things, that “said D. D. Metcalf (plaintiff) is a member of a partnership known as Holt Milling Company, of Nashville, Tenn., of which partnership D. D. Metcalf and W. P. Holt are members, and were members on the 4th day of June, 1917, neither firm nor members having any property or place of residence in said State, but entirely without its jurisdiction.” The remainder of the plea and answer alleges a claim against the Holt Milling Company for damages growing out of a breach of contract between the Holt Milling Company and the defendant. There is no allegation therein of insolvency of the Holt partnership, nor is any fact recited which shows mutuality of the cross-demand, but the allegations are merely as to the non-residence of the plaintiff and of the other partnership of which he was incidentally a partner. The court erred in overruling the demurrer to the defendant’s plea of set-off, and the subsequent proceeding were nugatory.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4222 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 665
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4222

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2004

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                             July 22, 2004

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 550 Nebraska Avenue in Kansas City, Kansas, as the ``Newell George 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 550 
Nebraska Avenue in Kansas City, Kansas, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Newell George Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Newell George Post Office 
Building''.

                                                       Calendar No. 665

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4222

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 550 Nebraska Avenue in Kansas City, Kansas, as the ``Newell George 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 22, 2004

                       Reported without amendment
```
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                            OF DONALD R. MASTROPIETRO

      This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the "Amendment  Agreement"),
effective as of November 29, 2005, is by and between  Medical Media  Television,
Inc., a Florida  corporation with a mailing address of 8406 Benjamin Road, Suite
C,  Tampa,  Florida  33634  (the  "Company"),  and  Donald R.  Mastropietro,  an
individual  maintaining  a mailing  address of 325 Whitfield  Avenue,  Sarasota,
Florida 34243 ("Employee").

      WHEREAS,  an  Employment  Agreement  was entered into on November 16, 2005
under which the Employee would receive an increase in his rate of pay; and

      WHEREAS,  the Company is still  reliant upon  investment  funds until such
time as operating revenues begin;

      NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

      1.    Salary   Adjustment:   The  Company  and  Employee  agree  that  the
            Employee's  current  annual  salary of $90,000 will remain in effect
            until such time as the increased  salary of $128,400 as set forth in
            the  Employment  Agreement  can  be  paid  through  cash  flow  from
            operations of the Company.

      All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed the Agreement on the day and
year first written above.

                                    "COMPANY"

                                    MEDICAL MEDIA TELEVISION, INC.


                                   By: /s/ Philip M. Cohen
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                           Philip M. Cohen, President


                                   "EMPLOYEE"


                                   /s/ Donald R. Mastropietro
                                   -------------------------------------------
                                       Donald R. Mastropietro
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 99

                        [LETTERHEAD OF QWEST CORPORATION]



                                 March 31, 2002

Via EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549

         RE: CONFIRMATION OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN REPRESENTATIONS

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter confirms that Qwest Corporation has received from Arthur Andersen
LLP, the independent public accountant engaged by the company to examine the
company's financial statements that are included in the Form 10-K to which this
letter is attached as an exhibit, a representation letter addressed to the
company and stating that:

    o    the audit conducted by Arthur Andersen was subject to Arthur Andersen's
         quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to
         provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in
         compliance with professional standards; and

    o    there was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working
         on audits, availability of national office consultation and
         availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen to
         conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

                                    Very truly yours,

                                    QWEST CORPORATION

                                    By:  /s/ Bryan K. Treadway
                                         ----------------------------------
                                         Name:  Bryan K. Treadway
                                         Title: Vice President and Controller
Exhibit 31.2



I, Anthony E. Applebaum, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.  The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.  The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and



6.  The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|Date:   March 18, 2007                    
|/s/ANTHONY E. APPLEBAUM                   
|Anthony E. Applebaum                      
|Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Kevin McGrattan, Ph.D.

Mathematician

Building and Fire Research Labo

National Institute of Standards and Tec

U.S. Department of Commerce

kevin.mcgrattan@nist.gov

Federal Building and Fire Safety Inves

of the World Trade Center Disast

Simulation of the Fires in WTC 

October 19, 2004
Overview Overview

• Development and validation of the Fire Dyna

for use in the WTC investigation is complete

• Numerical simulations of fires in WTC 1 and 

WTC 7 postponed.

• Three fire simulations performed for each bu

Realistic Case, More Severe Case, Less Se

assess sensitivity to changes in input param

• Results passed on to Fire/Structure Interface 

temperature of steel and concrete (Prasad)
Soff

open

Vertical shafts completely open

Soffits around openings of shafts

No rdebr

Rubble in aircraft path only

Rubble throughout 

Co

25 k

Combustibles

20 kg/m2 (4 lb/ft2)

Combustibles

15 kg/m2 (3 lb/ft2)

Less Severe Case Realistic Case Mo

Parameter Variations for Fire Si

Parameter Variations for Fire Si
FDS Simulations to Date

3 for WTC 1, Realistic Case, More/Less Severe – 16 pro

2 for WTC 2, Realistic Case, More Severe – 24 and 48 p
Upper Layer Temperatures, WTC 1, 
Upper Layer Temperatures, WTC 1
South Face of WTC 1 at 10:23
Summary of 

Fire Activity 

WTC 1

North Face

Courtesy Bill Pitts
Realistic Case Mo

WTC 1, 97th Floor, Sensitivity An
WTC 1, 94th Floor, Sensitivity An

Realistic Case M
Fire Activity

East/North Face
80th Floor 81s

Realistic Case Simulation, WT

Contrasting Fire Behavior on Impact Flo
WTC 2, 81st Floor, Sensitivity A

Realistic Case More 

Combustible Load more critical in WT
Summary Summary

• Fire simulations of WTC 1 relatively insensitive to • Fire simulations of WTC 2 more sensitive to com

barriers, aircraft damage

• Fires in WTC 1 spread around building more quic

predictably than fires in WTC 2

• Fires in WTC 2 confined to impact area – increas

modeling

• 20 kg/m2 (4 lb/ft2) combustible load consistent wi• Temperature predictions consistent with experim

elsewhere
Kevin McGrattan, Ph.D.

Mathematician

kevin.mcgrattan@nist.gov

Federal Building and Fire Safety Inves

of the World Trade Center Disast

Simulation of the Fires in WTC 

Thank you
June 10 2008