alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-88,522-01

IN RE BRANDON LEKEITH JOHNSO N, Relat or

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 885737-A IN THE 232ND DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ o f m an damus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 232nd District Court o f Ha rr i s County , that more than 35 day s have elapse d, and that the application has not y et bee n forwa rded to this Court. I n these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of Har ris County , is order ed to f

ile a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habea s corpus application, submitt ing a copy of a timely filed order which desig nates issues to be investiga ted ( see McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W .2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that2

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in Har ri s County

. Should the response include an order desig nating issues, proof of the date the district attorne y ’s o ff i ce was
serve d with the habea s applicatio n an d that the 180-day time fra me set out in T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 5) has not e x pired shall also be submitt ed with the re sponse. This application for leave to file a writ of m andamus shall be held in abey ance until R espondent has submitt ed the appropr iate response . Such response shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.

Filed: June 20, 2018 Do not publish
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit 

__________________________ 

IN RE DOROTHY M. HARTMAN 

__________________________ 

2013-1070 

(Serial No. 11/003,123) 

__________________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board. 

__________________________ 

ON MOTION 

__________________________ 

O R D E R 

Dorothy Hartman moves for leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis. 

 Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk 

s24 

Case: 13-1070 Document: 17 Page: 1 Filed: 01/14/2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd. at March 31, 1999, and its statement of income
for the three months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd.  for the three  months  ended March 31,
1999.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,158,507
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  385,613
<ALLOWANCES>                                   322,603
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         22,145,930
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,699,926
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 29,499,872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     28,464,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   29,499,872
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               737,448
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  202,337
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                656,386
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            656,386
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   656,386
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Due  to the  nature  of its  industry,  CNL  Income  Fund  VI,  Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Lorenzo Maurice JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.E. GUNJA, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-6321.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 17, 2001.

Decided May 29, 2001.

Lorenzo Maurice Johnson, pro se.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Lorenzo Maurice Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his *18028 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Johnson v. Gunja,*No. CA-01-473-WMN (D.Md. Feb. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 7, 2021

Order 

Clerk

July 7, 2021

163220(46)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 163220

v COA: 357389

Ottawa CC: 21-044265-AR

MARSHA PLAFKIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to file a supplement 

to her application for leave to appeal is GRANTED.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00042-CV

IN RE Jaime LUEVANO

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 9, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On January 18, 2011, relator filed what we construe as a petition for writ of mandamus. 

The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the 

relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

 1 Relator complains Judge Donna S. Rayes, presiding judge of the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, 

Texas has failed to rule on a writ of mandamus he filed in the trial court. The underlying proceeding is unknown.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, John E. Reed, certify that, to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 of Mestek, Inc. (the “Form 10-K/A”), the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and that information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mestek, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form 10-K/A.

 

 

/S/ John E. Reed____________________________________

 

John E. Reed

Chief Executive Officer 

 

I, Stephen M. Shea, certify that, to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 of Mestek, Inc. (the “Form 10-K/A”), the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and that information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mestek, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form 10-K/A.

 

/S/ Stephen M. Shea_____________________________________

 

Stephen M. Shea

Chief Financial Officer 

 

Dated: April 10, 2006

 

 
|   | Page 1 |
|--------|--------|
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our report
dated June 23, 1998 on the Newmont Gold Company Hourly Retirement Savings Plan,
included in this Form 11-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.


/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Denver, Colorado,
     June 26, 1998.
o_ u^Vaoo! a

Xcn V^fro \o Sae ^J^As qjoA So Vora \o ccxw roe ^ ^o tefe

VOcrf? ^O t!<3Ur\ vf\. ^OTViVVojC W^A ^s ^Ve WW c-W/A V^ern

t

on

^>\\ >crj$ V>vK Vr r^a W0(^ i.a>*TW\ * uses o*jop "v?q

\^ VV,?u <^efe a^oa V^> <fo$c»Sp c^ \To<r< -VVq_ C£Xa«vCa on\^c

QjTik._Vxj .rrv^ N^xHj? arsaV W\d ^txK iXXJfflro^ V^ca"S Uv\\u \f\\<tq

Vc V\V>e, So Vsr\* Vvv^j SckH3\ \^r^\ v^sp^ txdmoi k>

Vt^ 0 *\<l£> uf V\

9

^igD IN COURT OF APPEALS

12th CourtofAEEealsDistricI

CATHYSJLUSK

CO^ cidtn -«c^c»
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28763]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-463-000]


San Gorgonio Westwinds II, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of San Gorgonio Westwinds II, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is December 22, 2014.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#feb8bbacbdb1909297909bad8b8e8e918c8abe989b8c9dd0999188"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="094f4c5b4a46676560676c5a7c7979667b7d496f6c7b6a276e667f">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 2, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-28763 Filed 12-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3189

_____________________________
D AVID D. M C L AUGHLIN , Appellant,

v.

B EVERLY A. V AN H OOSEN , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County

. David Rimmer , Judge

. August 10, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. O STERHAUS , W INOKUR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Bradley G. Jo h nson of Bradley G. Johnson, P.A., Milton
, for Appellant.

R. Stan Peeler of the Peeler Law Firm, PLLC, Pensacola
, for Appellee.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  March 31, 2003 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:   May 6, 2003                      /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                         ----------------------------------
                                         Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                         Title: President and Treasurer


                                         A  signed   original  of  this  written
                                         statement  required  by Section 906 has
                                         been  provided  to CNL Income  Fund VI,
                                         Ltd. and will be retained by CNL Income
                                         Fund  VI,  Ltd.  and  furnished  to the
                                         Securities  and Exchange  Commission or
                                         its staff upon request.
Anti-Botnet Ecosystem 

Collabora6on, Educa6on, Best Prac6ces, Metrics and R&D

Shared Responsibility among End-­‐Users, Industry, Public & Private Sector

Prevent

• Educate against	
  

social

engineering	
  

• Protect	
  devices,

OS & apps

• MiCgate & limit	
  

aEack vectors &

exploits

• R & D

• Secure

infrastructure

Detect

• Acct. Abuse

• Anomalous Sys

Behavior

• Complaints

• Fraudulent	
  

Email

• Net	
  Traffic

• Sinkholes	
  

• System Scans

No6fy	
  

To: End Users,	
  

Business,	
  Govt, Law

Enforcement	
  

• Email

• Redirects,

• Postal mail

• Phone	
  

• SMS

• Teachable

moments

Remediate

• Guidance

• Legal AcCon

• Local Support	
  

• Repair &

Restore

• Resources

• Support	
  

• Tools

• Take Down

Recover

• Account	
  

credenCals

• Credit	
  

• Data	
  

• Financials

• IdenCty

• Intellectual

Property

• PII	
  

• ReputaCon

(users, sites &

businesses)	

© 2012 All rights reserved. Online Trust Alliance (OTA)
Federal Building and Fire Safety Inves

of the World Trade Center Disas

Project #8,

Fire Service Technologies and G

September 12, 2005

J. R. Lawson, Project Leader

Building and Fire Research Labo

National Institute of Standards and Tec

U.S. Department of Commerce

james.lawson@nist.gov
Statistics on Comments Received

Statistics on Comments Received

Comments received related to NCSTthe emergency response operations

• 24 comments from individuals• 8 governmental & quasi-governm• 5 industry• 4 standards organizations• 2 building codes organizations
Nature of Comments Nature of Comments

• NIST needs to qualify and quantify exactly what 

recommendations. Recommendations are too g

• Given the low probability of major events happen

is whether the cost of survivability of buildings, csystems, and other response recommendations benefit.

• NIST should carry out a cost analysis for all reco• NIST needs to identify minimum needs for techn

infrastructure and information to manage completype.

• Clarify language concerning NYPD aviation unit’

degrading building conditions and building collap

• Clarify information on the identification of FDNY 

from service in the spring of 2001.
Summary of Significant Changes Summary of Significant Changes

Report Content:

• A paragraph was rewritten to clearly state that NYP

not predict that WTC 2 was about to collapse but wto have large pieces of the building falling from the 

• Statement in report was corrected to say that 400 

were withdrawn from service by FDNY in the sprin

Findings:• No changes were made to the report findingsTowers Report:• Approximately six changes, mostly minor changes 

carried over to the Towers Report.
Questions? Questions?
NIST’s Portfolio of Programs in Advanced 

Manufacturing

Visiting Committee on Advanced Technology

October 17, 2012

Dr. Patrick Gallagher

Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology and NIST Director
NIST’s Portfolio of Programs in Advanced 

Manufacturing

2

Advanced manufacturing is fundamental to our economic strength and national 

security: it can create high-quality jobs, is an important source of exports, and is 

a key source of technological innovation. 

Manufacturing is at the heart of what NIST does, and is called out in the 

founding documents that established the National Bureau of Standards in 1901. 

NIST Laboratory 

Programs

Hollings 

Manufacturing 

Extension 

Partnership

AMTech

National 

Network for 

Manufacturing 

Innovation
The NIST Laboratories

3

Research programs address increasingly complex measurement challenges, 

ranging from the very small (nanoscale devices) to the very large (vehicles 

and buildings), and from the physical (renewable energy sources) to the 

virtual (cybersecurity and cloud computing). 

Measurement science and standards services

Interoperability standards and tools

Unique, cutting edge user facilities

Technology and knowledge transfer
NIST Laboratory Investments in Emerging Areas

• Biomanufacturing

• Nanomanufacturing

• Advanced Materials Modeling 

and Simulation

• Smart Manufacturing and 

Cyberphysical Systems

• Energy Efficiency and 

Sustainability 

4

© Robert Rathe

Credit: anyaivanova /Shutterstock

Credit: withGod/Shutterstock
Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP)

MEP Centers are non-profit organizations that leverage nearly $128 million of 

Federal investment into a $300 million program by partnering with state / 

local governments and the private sector

In FY 2009, MEP helped U.S. manufacturers realize $8.4 billion in increased or 

retained sales, leverage nearly $1.9 billion in new private sector investment, 

and generate more than $1.3 billion in cost savings, with 72,000 jobs created or 

retained.

Next-generation MEP strategies in five themes represent the next logical steps 

toward generating profit, creating jobs, and bolstering a long-term competitive 

position for the Nation’s manufacturers

1. Continuous performance improvement strategies

2. Technology acceleration

3. Supplier development

4. Sustainability

5. A Strong, engaged and skilled workforce

5
Proposed Programs

Advanced Manufacturing Technology Consortia Program (AMTech)

• Collapsing the timescale of technological innovation through industry-led 

consortium based R&D 

• $21M in FY 2013 budget request

National Network for Manufacturing Innovation (NNMI)

• A network of up to 15 Institutes for Manufacturing Innovation will bridge 

the existing gap in the U.S. innovation ecosystem between basic research 

and deployment of commercial products/technologies

• $1B in FY 2013 budget request 

• (mandatory spending, requires legislation)

6

Credit: B. Young/NIST
Organizational Resources at NIST 

7

Program 

Coordination 

Office

Advanced 

Manufacturing 

National 

Program 

Office

Economic 

Analysis Office
#### Harlan *v.*Watson et al.

Supreme Court.—Notice.—Where notice is not given to co-parties not joining in an appeal to the Supreme Court, as required by section 551 of the code, the appeal will be dismissed.

*Same—Parties.—Guardian ad*Litem.—A guardian *ad litem*cannot appeal to the Supreme Court in his own name.

APPEAL from the Tipton- Circuit Court.

*D. Moss*and *N. R. Overman,*for appellant.

*y. W. Robinson, y. Green,*and *D. Waugh,*for appellees.

Downey, J.

This action was commenced by the appellees against Joshua K. Harlan, Sr., Arttissa Harlan, Joshua K. Harlan, Jr., John O. Harlan, Rosa B. Harlan, and Josiah M. Clark, to set aside certain conveyances as made to defraud creditors. There was judgment against the defendants. Part of them appeal, and the assignment of errors is by Arttissa Harlan alone, in her own behalf and as guardian *ad litem*for Joshua K. Harlan, Jr., John C. Harlan, and Rosa B. Harlan.

We think the appeal will have to be dismissed. A guardian *ad litem*cannot appeal in his or her own name. But in addition to this there is no appeal by the other defendants, nor is any notice served on them,' as required by 2 G. & H. 270, sec. 551; and see *Kirby*v. *Holmes,*6 Ind. 33.

*T¿ie*appeal is dismissed, with costs.
10951.

#### Cutts *v.*The State.

Decided December 9, 1919.

Indictment for manufacture of intoxicating liquor; from Terrell superior court—Judge Worrill. September 22, 1919.

IF. *H. Gwrr,*for plaintiff in error.

*B. T. Castellow? solicitor-general, B. R. Arnold,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

1. When considered in the light of the entire charge and of the facts, and of the qualifying note of the trial judge to the first ground of the motion for a new trial, the motion points out no error which would require the grant of a new trial.

2. The evidence authorized the conviction, the verdict is approved by the presiding judge, no error of law is pointed out, and the judgment is

*Affirmed.*

*Broyles, p. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the inclusion in this registration statement on Form S-4
(File No. 333-62021) of our report dated February 20, 1998, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Home Interiors & Gifts, Inc. and
Subsidiaries. We also consent to the references to our firm under the captions
'Summary Historical Consolidated Financial Data', 'Selected Historical
Consolidated Financial Data' and 'Experts.'
 
                                               /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
Dallas, Texas
November 24, 1998