alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Keith Wayne Francis v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 9

- 00 870

- CR

Trial court case number: 1 614325

Trial court: 176th District Court, Harris County, Texas

Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the above

referenced appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant, acting pro se, has filed a motion requesting access to a copy of the appellate record for use in preparing a response to appointed counsel’s brief. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 315, 318

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant has also filed a motion for an extension of time to file his response

.
We grant the motion for access and order the trial court clerk, no later than 10 days from the date of this order, to provide a copy of the record, including the clerk’s record, the reporter’s record, and any supplemental records, to the appellant. The trial court clerk shall further certify to this Court, within 15 days of the date of this order, the date upon which delivery of the record to the appellant is made. Finally, we grant appellant’s request

for an extension in that we order appellant’s respo nse to his appointed counsel’s brief to be filed within 45 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____

/s/ Sher r y Radack

____  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date:

__ March 19, 2020

____
Personal Manufacturing 

Extreme Manufacturing Workshop White Paper 

Bruce M. Kramer 

Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation 

National Science Foundation 

Sophisticated tools that have traditionally been available only to engineers in industrial 

settings are now becoming accessible to individuals without formal training in 

engineering. Most notable among these are highly functional desktop CAD systems, 

but most of the codified knowledge of engineering, which comprises the vast majority of 

what is taught in universities, has been or soon will be embodied in software that will run 

on desktop computers. Numerous machine shops and rapid prototyping services 

already accept web-based submissions of CAD files from individuals for bid and 

production, and low-end rapid prototyping systems can be purchased for less than 

$10,000. 

While the argument should always be made that deep expert knowledge is required to 

appreciate the limitations of engineering software, the fact is that such knowledge is not 

a strong emphasis of undergraduate engineering education and is often not available in 

the commercial setting. While a higher percentage of failed designs may be expected 

to result in the non-professional setting, their potential impacts are likely limited to the 

personal financial losses, inconveniences and injuries of the designers. These 

constitute the traditional risks of the innovator in our culture and likely present a small 

impediment to innovation, since the entrepreneurial culture of the United States is quite 

accepting of such risks. Indeed, the lack of stigma attached to entrepreneurial failure in 

the US is nearly unique and may be one of our greatest advantages in global 

competition. 

The idea of creating an infrastructure that can give the citizen-designer and teams of 

citizen-designers full access to the means, including expert and/or bulletin-board based 

consulting services, for designing, prototyping, testing, financing, manufacturing, 

promoting and marketing their inventions is extreme. However, the concept builds on 

strong precedents in journalism, music, and electronic commerce, in which computer 

and web-based modalities are displacing existing production, distribution and marketing 

schemes and dramatically reducing the costs of entry.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29042]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than December 29, 2014.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. The JCR 2015 LFG Trust and Joshua C. Rowland, Kansas City, 
Missouri, individually and as co-trustee, of the JCR 2015 LFG Trust, 
Kansas City, Missouri, to acquire voting shares of Lead Financial 
Group, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Lead Bank, 
both in Garden City, Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 8, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-29042 Filed 12-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JAMES E. HUDSON and 

DIROTHIEUS C. HUDSON, :

plaintiffs, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 04-0821-WS-M

CARDWELL CORPORATION, :

Defendant. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of

this file deemed relevant to the issue raised, and there

having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation

of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) is

ADOPTED as the opinion of this court. It is ORDERED that

Plaintiff Dirothieus C. Hudson’s claims be DISMISSED without

prejudice for failure to prosecute and to obey the Court’s

Order. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff James E. Hudson’s

claims will proceed in this action.

DONE this 25th day of August, 2005.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-00821-WS-M Document 9 Filed 08/25/05 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JAMES E. HUDSON and 

DIROTHIEUS C. HUDSON, :

Plaintiffs, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 04-0821-WS-M

CARDWELL CORPORATION, :

Defendant. :

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff

Dirothieus C. Hudson’s claims be DISMISSED without prejudice

for failure to prosecute and to obey the Court’s Order. 

DONE this 25th day of August, 2005.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 1:04-cv-00821-WS-M Document 9 Filed 08/25/05 Page 2 of 2
Overview of Statistics Focus Area 

in NIST Forensic Science Research

Will Guthrie, Chief

NIST Statistical Engineering Division
Research Areas

• Assessing Weight of Evidence

• Footwear and Tire Tread Analysis

• DNA Analysis

• Drug Identification / Purity

• Firearms ID

• Analysis of Explosive Residues

• Trace Analysis of Fibers

1
DNA Analysis

• S. Gittelson, C.R. Steffen, M.D. Coble (2016) 

“Low-Template DNA: A Single DNA Analysis or 

Two Replicates?” Forensic Science International.

• Goal: To determine how many replicate PCR 

amplifications to perform on low-template DNA 

– Analysis focuses on expected value of information 

from an additional replicate versus a larger single 

sample. 

– Bottom Line: Two samples are better in many cases

2
Drug Purity

• B. Toman, M.A. Nelson, K.A. Lippa (2016) 

“Chemical Purity Using Quantitative 1H-Nuclear 

Magnetic Resonance,” Metrologia.

• Goal: Demonstrate method for suitable for 

traceable drug purity assessments

– Two primary purity standards each used to calibrate 

two secondary standards compatible with final analyte

– Bayesian hierarchical model allows assessment of 

uncertainty from both experimental observations 

using different standards and primary standards 3
Firearms ID

• J. Song, T.V. Vorburger, W. Chu, J. Yen, J.A. Soons, 

D.B. Ott, N.-F. Zhang (2017) “Estimating Error 

Rates for Firearm Evidence Identifications in 

Forensic Science,” in submission.

• Goal: Determine error rates for firearms ID’s 

using Congruent Matching Cells (CMC) method 

– CMC method originally assumed binomial distribution 

for matching and non-matching cells

– New examination of beta-binomial and dependent 

binomial models both offer better fidelity to data 4
Analysis of Explosive Residues

• E. Sisco, M. Najarro, D. Samarov, J. Lawrence, 

“Quantifying Stability of Trace Explosives under 

Different Environmental Conditions,” in review.

• Goal: Investigate stability of trace deposits of six 

explosives (ETN, PETN, RDX, HMX, TNT, Tetryl) to 

determine environmental stabilities and lifetimes.

– Samples inkjet printed onto sample traps to achieve 

trace amounts, then exposed to 1 of 7 environments

– Exponential decay model fit using non-linear least 

squares, false discovery rate controlled in pairwise 

comparisons of decay rates for each explosive 5
Summary

• Statistics Focus Area in NIST Forensic Science 

Research program covers use of statistics in 

both fundamental and applied projects 

• Some areas overlap with CSAFE research (e.g. 

footwear analysis and firearms ID) and some 

do not (e.g. drug ID/purity and DNA)

• A wide range of statistical methods have been 

used, as appropriate, in different applications

6
Exhibit 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kiwibox.Com, Inc.(the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”), each of the undersigned,
Andre Scholz, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Craig Cody, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
    and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:  August 20, 2012 |     |                                       | 
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------- | 
|                       |     |                                       | 
|                       | By: | /s/ Andre Scholz                      | 
|                       |     | Andre Scholz                          | 
|                       |     | President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|                       |     | (principal executive officer)         | 



|Date:  August 20, 2012 |     |                                                                | 
|---------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                       |     |                                                                | 
|                       | By: | /s/ Craig Cody                                                 | 
|                       |     | Craig Cody                                                     | 
|                       |     | Chief Financial Officer                                        | 
|                       |     | (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) |