alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 230 (Monday, December 1, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 71153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28176]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Publication of the Tier 2 Tax Rates

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Publication of the tier 2 tax rates for calendar year 2015 as 
required by section 3241(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 
3241). Tier 2 taxes on railroad employees, employers, and employee 
representatives are one source of funding for benefits under the 
Railroad Retirement Act.

DATES: The tier 2 tax rates for calendar year 2015 apply to 
compensation paid in calendar year 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Edmondson, CC:TEGE:EOEG:ET1, 
Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20224, Telephone Number (202) 317-6798 (not a toll-free number). TIER 2 
TAX RATES: The tier 2 tax rate for 2015 under section 3201(b) on 
employees is 4.9 percent of compensation. The tier 2 tax rate for 2015 
under section 3221(b) on employers is 13.1 percent of compensation. The 
tier 2 tax rate for 2015 under section 3211(b) on employee 
representatives is 13.1 percent of compensation.

    Dated: November 21, 2014.
Victoria A. Judson,
Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government 
Entities).
[FR Doc. 2014-28176 Filed 11-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4816

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2004

Received 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2004

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

AN ACT

To permit the Librarian of Congress to hire Library of 

Congress Police employees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 4816 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. PERMITTING LIBRARIAN OF CONGRESS TO 

2 HIRE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS POLICE EM3 PLOYEES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1006 of the Legislative 

5 Branch Appropriations Act, 2004 (2 U.S.C. 1901 note), 

6 is amended—

7 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘TRAINING, DE8 TAILING, AND HIRING’’ and inserting ‘‘TRAINING

9 AND DETAILING’’; 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘(a)’’ and the heading of sub11 section (a); 

12 (3) by striking subsection (b) and redesignating 

13 paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) as sub14 sections (a) and (b); and 

15 (4) in subsection (b) (as so redesignated), by 

16 striking ‘‘paragraph (1)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection 

17 (a)’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact20 ment of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2004.

Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         361,554
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,909,455
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,051,649
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,558,679
<PP&E>                                       1,420,581
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,038,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,352,671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,600,189
<BONDS>                                        609,744
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           343
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,800,551
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,352,671
<SALES>                                      4,388,412
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,388,412
<CGS>                                        2,813,392
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,597,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (49,740)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (69,013)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (72,360)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (31,115)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (41,245)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
#### The Board of Commissioners of Jackson County *v.*Elliott.

Soldier’s Widow.—Relief.—Since the 3¿t'of March, 1866, widows of soldiers who died of disease contracted in the military service of the United States cannot, under the statute of March 4th, 1865, as a matter of right, enforce any claim against a county on account of said services.

APPEAL from the Jackson Circuit Court.

Worden, J.

In June, 1869, the appellee commenced this action in the circuit court, against the appellant, to recover money claimed to be due her as the widow of Rawley A. C. Elliott, a non-commissioned officer in the military service of the United States, and who died of disease contracted in such service. Her claim was based on the act of March 4th, 1865, for the relief of the families of soldiers, etc. Acts 1865, Regular Session, 93.

The appellant resisted the claim, but such proceedings were had as that it was allowed by the court; and the appellant excepted and brings the case here.

In the case of *Sims*v. *The Board of Commissioners of Monroe County, ante,*p. 40, we have decided that by the act of December 20th, 1865 (Acts 1865, Special Session, 59), the former law was so far repealed and modified as that on and- after the 3d day of March, 1866, all disbursements under the former law ceased; and that after that date it was discretionary with the commissioners to make or not make allowances in any given case, under the provisions of *192the latter statute; in other words, it was decided that after the 3d of March, 1866, such widows could not enforce any claim against the county under those statutes, as a matter of right.

*J. B. Brown,*for appellant.

*Alspaugh & Baynes*and *J. R. Troxett,*for appellee.

It follows that the judgment below is erroneous and must be reversed.

The judgment below is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded,
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4750 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4750

 To require any uniforms purchased for the Border Patrol to be made in 
                           the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2004

 Mr. Renzi (for himself and Mr. Hayes) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require any uniforms purchased for the Border Patrol to be made in 
                           the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT FOR BORDER PATROL UNIFORMS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all uniforms procured 
for the use of Border Patrol agents shall be manufactured in the United 
States substantially all from articles, materials, or supplies mined, 
produced, or manufactured, as the case may be, in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Anthony J. Miceli, Chief Financial Officer of United Capital Corp. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) that:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
    Date:  March 30, 2011
  
 /
 s/ Anthony J. MiceliAnthony J. MiceliChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                              --------------------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WRP Corporation (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Lew Kwong
Ann, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alan E. Zeffer, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Lew Kwong Ann
-----------------

Name: Lew Kwong Ann
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
Date:  November 14, 2002

/s/ Alan E. Zeffer
------------------

Name: Alan E. Zeffer
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Date:  November 14, 2002

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


                                       24
NICE	Working	Group

Meeting	Agenda

Date:	10/25/2017 Time:	3:30	PM	EST

SharePoint: https://nistgov.sharepoint.com/sites/NICEProgram/NICEWG

I. Introduction	and	Ground	Rules	

II. NICE	Program	Office	Updates

III. Opening	Remarks

a. Academic	Co-Chair

b. Industry	Co-Chair

IV. Standing	Items

a. Fun	Facts	– creating	a	culture	of	evidence	

Topic:	Black	Hat	Hacker	Survey

URL:	https://thycotic.com/resources/black-hat-2017-

survey/?utm_medium=Internal-Email&utm_source=Pardot&utm_campaign=blackhat-2017&utm_content=black-hat-survey&utm_term=080717

b. Report	Roundup	– learning	from	good	ideas	

Topic:	Securing	Our	Future:	Cybersecurity	and	the	Millennial	Workforce

URL:	

https://www.raytheon.com/cyber/rtnwcm/groups/cyber/documents/content/2017

_cyber_report_rev1.pdf

c. Event	Engagement	– highlights	from	recent	events	and	upcoming	events	

Topic: National	Cyber	Security	Career	Awareness	Month	- October	23-27	(Weekly	

Theme	of “The	Internet	Wants	You:	Consider	a	Career	in	Cybersecurity”)

URL: https://www.facebook.com/staysafeonline/videos/10156110999824218/

Topic: Women	in	Cyber	Security	Conference

URL: www.wicys.net

d. Strategy	Stories	– new	developments	that	align	to	NICE	Strategy	

Topic:	Cybersecurity	Career	Program

Objective	2.4:	Grow	creative	and	effective	efforts	to	increase	the	number	of	women,	

minorities,	veterans,	persons	with	disabilities,	and	other	underrepresented	

populations	in	the	cybersecurity	workforce
e. Metric	Moment	– what	gets	measured	gets	done

Topic:	CyberHawaii	Education	and	Workforce	Development	and	Measures	for	

Success

URL:	https://www.fbcinc.com/e/cyberhawaii

V. Subgroup	Updates

a. K-12

b. Collegiate

c. Competitions

d. Training	and	Certifications

e. Workforce	Management

VI. Project	Progress	Reports

a. NICE	K-12	Cybersecurity	Education	Conference

URL: https://www.k12cybersecurityconference.org/

b. NICE	Annual	Conference

URL: https://www.fbcinc.com/e/nice/default.aspx

c. NICE	Challenge	Project

URL: https://nice-challenge.com/

VII. New	Business

a. Gen	Cyber	Applications

URL:	https://www.gen-cyber.com/

b. Kick	Off	Event	for	National	Cybersecurity	Career	Awareness	Week

URL:	www.nist.gov/nice/nccaw				

VIII. Summary	of	Action	Items

IX. Next	Meeting	Reminder
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 20, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-11483

Summary Calendar

 

JAMES H. MATLOCK,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

COLE JETER, Warden, Federal Medical Center, Fort Worth,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:04-CV-863-A

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James H. Matlock, a federal prisoner (# 90897-012), appeals

the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition,

which was purportedly filed pursuant to the “savings clause” of

28 U.S.C. § 2255. He attacked his 1991 sentence for distribution

of cocaine base, arguing pursuant to Blakely v. Washington,

124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), that the facts underlying his “career

offender” enhancement, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, were neither submitted

to a jury nor admitted, in violation of the Sixth Amendment.
No. 04-11483

-2-

Now relying on United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738

(2005), Matlock contends that his Booker claim falls within the

savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255. To proceed under the savings

clause, the applicant must make the following three-part showing: 

(1) that his claim is based on a retroactively applicable Supreme

Court decision; (2) the Supreme Court case “establishes that he

was ‘actually innocent’ of the charges against him because the

decision decriminalized the conduct for which he was convicted”;

and (3) precedent foreclosed this claim at the time of the

petitioner’s trial, appeal, or first § 2255 motion. Christopher

v. Miles, 342 F.3d 378, 382 (5th Cir.) (citing Reyes-Requena v.

United States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001)), cert. denied,

540 U.S. 1085 (2003).

Even assuming arguendo that the savings clause applies,

Matlock has not stated a cognizable Booker claim. Determinations

supporting a career-offender enhancement are questions of law,

not fact, and do not implicate the Sixth Amendment. See United

States v. Guevara, F.3d , No. 03-11299 (5th Cir. May 2,

2005), 2005 WL 1009772 at *6. “Career offender status is not a

‘sentencing judge’s determination of a fact other than a prior

conviction.’” Id. (citing Booker, 125 S. Ct. at 747 n.1).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 21
            SUBSIDIARIES OF MILLIPORE CORPORATION
Pursuant  to Item 601, Paragraph 21, clause (ii) of Regulation
S-K,  the following list excludes subsidiaries who conduct  no
business operations or which have no significant assets.
Company Name                            Jurisdiction of
Organization
Millipore Asia Ltd.                          Delaware
  Millipore Korea Ltd.                       Korea
  Millipore Singapore, Pte. Ltd.             Singapore
Millipore Cidra, Inc.                        Delaware
Millipore Intertech, (V.I.), Inc.            U.S. Virgin Is.
Millipore (Canada) Ltd.                      Canada
Millipore S.A. de C.V.                       Mexico
Millipore GesmbH                             Austria
  Millipore Kft                              Hungary
  Millipore S.R.O.                           Czech Republic
Millipore Investment Holdings Ltd.           Delaware
 Millipore International Holding Company B.V.     Netherlands
  Millipore Japan Company L.L.C.            Delaware
     Nihon Millipore Limited                 Japan
  Millipore S.A./N.V.                       Belgium
  Millipore (U.K.) Ltd.                     United Kingdom
  Millipore S.A.                            France
    Prochrom S.A.                           France
  Millipore Ireland B.V.                    Netherlands
    Millipore Dublin International Finance Company Ireland
  Millipore GmbH                            West Germany
  Millipore S.p.A.                          Italy
  Millipore A.B.                            Sweden
  Millipore AS                              Norway
  Millipore A.G.                            Switzerland
  Millipore A/S                             Denmark
  Millipore Australia Pty. Ltd.             Australia
  Millipore Iberica S.A.                    Spain
  Millipore I.E.C., Ltda.                   Brazil
  Millipore OY                              Finland
  Millipore B.V.                            The Netherlands
  Millipore China Ltd.                      Hong Kong
Millipore Pacific Limited                    Delaware
  Millipore (Suzhou) Filter Company Limited  Peoples Republic of
China
Millicorp, Inc.                              Delaware
Minerva Insurance Co. Ltd.                   Bermuda
Vermeer                                      Ireland
#### John B. Kennedy *v.*B. C. Grider's Ex'r.

New Trial — Awarding by Court of Appeals.

Tlie court of appeals will not grant a neiw trial where the jury was not instructed and the finding of the jury was not so palpably against the evidence that the judgment of the court could not stand.

New Trial — Newly Discovered Evidence.

A new trial will not he granted because of newly discovered evidence which is merely cumulative and which with due diligence could have been discovered and used on the trial.

APPEAL FROM WARREN CIRCUIT ' COURT.

October 9, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

The issue of fact was submitted to the jury without any instructions as to the law of the case. None were asked by either party, and we do not consider their finding so palpably against the weight of the evidence as to authorize this court to interpose, and award a new trial regardless of the judgment of the circuit judge, who heard the evidence and saw and knew the witnesses.

The grounds for a new trial on -the discovery of important evidence are not made out. Several of the witnesses whose evidence *166has been subsequently discovered were examined on the trial. They were all well known to appellant. Indeed, there seems to have been no diligence whatever used by appellant. Moreover, the alleged discovered evidence relates to facts that were directly in issue on the trial, and were investigated by the testimony then introduced.

*Hines & Porter, Gorin, for appellant.*

*W. Underwood, for appellees.*

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMDL, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arthur
S. Rosten, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|    |  |                                          
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------
|/s/ |  | Arthur S. Rosten                         
|    |  |                                          
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         127,307
<SECURITIES>                                11,032,112
<RECEIVABLES>                                  230,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,320
<PP&E>                                       4,121,437
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,097,969
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,438,169
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,043
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,409,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,438,169
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               472,509
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  241,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                231,251
<INCOME-TAX>                                   231,251
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            231,251
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   231,251
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>