alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-50374

CENTRAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

WHITE STONE PROPERTIES LTD.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:12-CV-275

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Following a bench trial, White Stone Properties Ltd. (“White Stone”) 

appeals from a final judgment entered by the district court, holding that 

Central Mutual Insurance Company (“Central Mutual”) owed no further 

payment to its insured, White Stone, under the terms of a replacement-cost 

coverage provision of an insurance policy (“the Policy”). White Stone also 

appeals from the district court’s holding that White Stone “take nothing” on its 

counter claims against Central Mutual for (1) a declaratory judgment that 

Central Mutual owes payments to White Stone pursuant to the Policy; (2) 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 10, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-50374 Document: 00512963802 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/10/2015
No. 14-50374

breach of contract; (3) breach of the common law duty of good faith and fair 

dealing; and (4) violations of the Texas Insurance Code. A careful review of 

the record in this case, a full consideration of the parties’ briefs and oral 

arguments, and a thorough analysis of the district court’s articulate ruling lead 

us to conclude that the district court’s judgment was correct. Because the 

district court opinion’s careful analysis thoroughly explains its sound reasons 

and judgment, we need not engage in a redundant analysis simply to reach the 

same result. We therefore AFFIRM the district court’s judgment for 

essentially the same reasons assigned by the district court. 

2

 Case: 14-50374 Document: 00512963802 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/10/2015
No. 15,267.

#### The Greenfield Gas Company *v.*The People’s Gas Company et al.

Filed April 30, 1892.

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

*D. S. Gooding,*for appellant.

*J. A. New, G. G. Offutt*and *R. A. Black,*for appellee.

Coffey, J.

The only question discussed by counsel for the appellant in this case relates to the right of the appellees to explode nitro-glycerine in their gas well for the purpose of increasing the flow of gas. The question presented is the same as that which arose on the first cause alleged for an injunction in the case of *People’s Gas Co.*v. *Tyner, ante,*p. 277, and upon the authority of that case the judgment in this caséis affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 73486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28896]



[[Page 73486]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 2 and 15

[GN Docket No. 12-268; FCC 14-50]


Expanding the Economic and Innovation Opportunities of Spectrum 
Through Incentive Auctions

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; announcement of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 15, 2014, the Commission released a Report and 
Order, ``Expanding the Economic and Innovation Opportunities of 
Spectrum Through Incentive Auctions.'' This document announces an 
effective date for several sections in the final regulations that 
appeared in the Federal Register on August 15, 2014 (79 FR 48442).

DATES: 47 CFR 2.1033(c)(19)(iii); 15.713(b)(2)(iv) and 15.713(h)(10), 
published in the Federal Register on August 15, 2914 (79 FR 48442) are 
effective December 11, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Brooks, Office of Engineering 
and Technology, (202) 418-2454 or email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cf81aea1acb6e18dbda0a0a4bc8fa9acace1a8a0b9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b9f7d8d7dac097fbcbd6d6d2caf9dfdada97ded6cf">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations that are the subject of this document relate 
to ``Expanding the Economic and Innovation Opportunities of Spectrum 
Through Incentive Auctions'' under the dates section for Sec. Sec.  
2.1033(c)(19)(iii); 15.713(b)(2)(iv) and 15.713(h)(10) of the rules.

Need for Correction

    As published, the Dates section contains errors, which may prove to 
be misleading.
    In the Dates section of the Federal Register Sec. Sec.  
2.1033(c)(19)(iii); 15.713(b)(2)(iv) and 15.713(h)(10) were 
inadvertently listed with sections that were not yet effective. These 
sections do not contain new or modified information collection 
requirements that require approval by the Office of Management and 
Budget.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-28896 Filed 12-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28855]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; Federal Health IT Strategic Plan: 2015-2020 Open Comment 
Period

AGENCY: ONC, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Authority: Section 3001(c)(3) of the Public Health Service Act.

SUMMARY: Section 3001(c)(3) of the Public Health Service Act, as added 
by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health 
(HITECH) Act, requires the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology (ONC) to update the Federal Health IT Strategic Plan 
(developed June 3, 2008; last updated on September 15, 2011) in 
consultation with other appropriate federal agencies and in 
collaboration with private and public entities. The Plan was developed 
in collaboration across multiple federal agencies, and ONC will seek 
input on the draft Plan from the private sector through the Health IT 
Policy Committee. This notice serves to announce that the public 
comment period for the Federal Health IT Strategic Plan is open through 
Tuesday, February 6 at 5:00 p.m. (Eastern). ONC welcomes and encourages 
all comments from the public regarding the Plan.
    In order for your comments to be read and considered, you must 
submit your comment via http://www.healthit.gov/policy-researchers-implementers/strategic-plan-public-comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Swain, Program Analyst in the 
Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Analysis, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dfb2beababb7baa8f1aca8beb6b19fb7b7acf1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4b262a3f3f232e3c65383c2a22250b232338652c243d">[email protected]</span></a>, 
202.205.3754.

    Dated: December 4, 2014.
Matthew Swain,
Program Analyst, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Analysis, Office 
of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), 
Office of the Secretary (OS).
[FR Doc. 2014-28855 Filed 12-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-45-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 23.2
 
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
 
 
 As independent engineering consultants, Joe C. Neal & Associates, hereby consents to the use of the name Joe C. Neal & Associates and references to Joe C. Neal & Associates and to the inclusion of and references to our report, or information contained therein, entitled “Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves, Mexco Energy Corporation Annual Report Effective Date: March 31, 2010” prepared for Mexco Energy Corporation in the annual report on Form 10-K of Mexco Energy Corporation for the filing dated on or about June 29, 2010.
  
 /s/ Joe C. Neal & Associates
 JOE C. NEAL & ASSOCIATES,
 PETROLEUM AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
 
 Midland, Texas
 June 29, 2010
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION RE AUDIT COMMITTEE COMPENSATION



 Exhibit 10.39 
  
 RESOLVED that retroactive to the July 27, 2005 Audit Committee meeting, that the Audit Committee members should be paid as follows for quarterly meetings where the
financial results press release is approved, the 10-Q is approved, and the Committee meets with and hears from the independent auditors concerning SAS61 matters: $1,500 to the Chairman of the Audit Committee for such meeting, and $750 to each member
of the Committee for such meeting, regardless of whether attendance is in person or by teleconference, and regardless of whether it occurs on a regular Board of Directors meeting day.
Ref. 17-025
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,966
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,197
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     40,898
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,842
<PP&E>                                         109,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 230,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,574
<BONDS>                                        189,748
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                    (17,863)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   230,444
<SALES>                                         66,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,742
<CGS>                                           54,125
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,125
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,562
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,078
<INCOME-TAX>                                       149
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,227
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  5,471
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,244)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (12.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Motion Granted; Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum

Opinion filed July 17 , 2012

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00521

- CV

IN RE STEVEN BALLOR , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Probate Court No. 1 Harris County, Texas

Trial Court No. 403486



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On Ju ly 11, 2012, relator Steven Ballor filed a motion to dismiss his petition for

writ of mandamus because the parties have entered into a settlement agreement.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher and Jamison.
Exhibit 31.2
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AMDL, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a  15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
   Date: May 15, 2009
    /s/ Akio AriuraAkio AriuraChief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary (Principal Financial Officer)
AMDL, Inc.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Elizabeth H. Davila, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of VISX, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such condensed consolidated interim financial statements fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of VISX, Incorporated.

| |                                                                                     
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Elizabeth H. DavilaElizabeth H. Davila
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002

I, Timothy R. Maier, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of VISX, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such condensed consolidated interim financial statements fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of VISX, Incorporated.

| |                                                                               
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Timothy R. MaierTimothy R. Maier
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
EXHIBIT 23(a)



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To the Shareholders of
ALLTEL Corporation:


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the previously filed registration statements of ALLTEL Corporation 
on Forms S-8 (Registration No's. 2-99523, 33-35343, 33-48476, 33-54175, 33-56291
and 33-65199) of our report dated April 16, 1999, on our audit of the financial 
statements of the ALLTEL Corporation Thrift Plan as of December 31, 1998 and 
1997 and for the year ended December 31, 1998 and our report dated April 16, 
1999, on our audit of the 360 Retirement Savings Plan as of December 31, 1998 
and 1997 and for the year ended December 31, 1998, which reports are 
incorporated by reference in this Amendment No. 2 to the 1998 ALLTEL Corporation
Annual Report on Form 10-K.





                                                          /s/Arthur Andersen LLP
                                                            ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Little Rock, Arkansas,
April 28, 1999.



                                        3
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4365 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the inflation 

adjustment of the phaseout of the credit for producing fuel from a 

nonconventional source and to repeal the extension of the credit for 

facilities producing synthetic fuels from coal. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2004 

Mr. DOGGETT (for himself, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. LEACH, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. 

BLUMENAUER, Mr. COOPER, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. EMANUEL, 

Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. 

KUCINICH, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. SANDERS, Ms. DELAURO, Ms. LEE, Mr. 

TIERNEY, Mr. MCDERMOTT, and Mr. STARK) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate 

the inflation adjustment of the phaseout of the credit 

for producing fuel from a nonconventional source and 

to repeal the extension of the credit for facilities producing synthetic fuels from coal. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Protection 

5 Against Wasteful Energy Credits Act’’. 
2 

•HR 4365 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF INFLATION ADJUSTMENT FOR 

2 PHASEOUT OF SECTION 29 CREDIT; TERMI3 NATION OF EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR FA4 CILITIES PRODUCING SYNTHETIC FUELS 

5 FROM COAL. 

6 (a) ELIMINATION OF INFLATION ADJUSTMENT FOR

7 CREDIT PHASEOUT.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 

9 29(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

10 amended by striking ‘‘and the $23.50 and $6 

11 amounts in paragraph (1) shall each’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘shall’’. 

13 (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The heading of 

14 such paragraph is amended by striking ‘‘AND

15 PHASEOUT ADJUSTMENT’’. 

16 (b) TERMINATION OF EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR

17 FACILITIES PRODUCING SYNTHETIC FUELS FROM

18 COAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 29(g) of the Internal 

19 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to extension for certain 

20 facilities) is amended by striking ‘‘subparagraph (B)(ii) or 

21 (C) of subsection (c)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection 

22 (c)(1)(B)(ii)’’. 

23 (c) EFFECTIVE DATES.— 

24 (1) SUBSECTION (a).—The amendments made 

25 by subsection (a) shall apply to qualified fuels sold 
3 

•HR 4365 IH 

1 in taxable years beginning after the date of the en2 actment of this Act. 

3 (2) SUBSECTION (b).—The amendments made 

4 by subsection (b) shall apply to qualified fuels sold 

5 after the date of the enactment of this Act, in tax6 able years ending after such date. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Date:  March 9, 2007  /s/ James H. Moore James H. Moore Chief Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mines Management, Inc. and will be retained by Mines Management, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2






   
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


     We consent to the use in this Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement
Nos. 333-49289 and 333-49289-01  of Southern Foods Group, L.P. and SFG Capital
Corporation to the Form S-4 of our report on Meadow Gold Dairy Operations dated
June 27, 1997, appearing in the Prospectus, which is part of such Registration
Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Prospectus.
    




   
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
June 15, 1998
10606.

#### Ward *v.*The State.

Luke, J.

The evidence in this case fully authorized, if indeed it did not demand, the verdict of manslaughter.

The charge given by the court on the law of manslaughter was required. See *Trice*v. *State,*89 *Ga.*742 (15 S. E. 648). The court did not err in charging the'jury as follows: “In every ease of an unlawful killing malice will be presumed, wheze no considerable provocation appears and all the circumstances of the killing show an abandoned and malignant heart. If one shoots another without any reason, and, although you may not be able to show that he made up his mind to do so with any degree of deliberation, if he shoots another without any known reason, and all the circumstances show that he did so wantonly, without any reason, without any provocation, the law implies malice in a ease of that sort.” See *Harrell*v. *State,*22 *Ga. App.*104 (95 S. E. 537), and *275case cited. The defendant had a fair trial, was ably represented, and no error appears which authorizes a new trial.

Decided October 14, 1919.

Indictment for murder; from Bibb superior court—Judge Mathews. April 22, 1919.

*John B. Cooper, C. M. Cunningham, W. 0. Cooper Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*John P. Boss, solicitor-general,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, G. J., and Blood/worth, J., eoneur.*