alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         141,284
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  400,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (10,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,060,682
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,789,719
<PP&E>                                       6,736,830
<DEPRECIATION>                                 368,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,403,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,433,847
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,763,652
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,403,961
<SALES>                                      1,309,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,309,636
<CGS>                                          577,289
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  577,289
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               636,134
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (114,328)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,044)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,044)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,044)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

LARRY BERNARD PACE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3517

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 13, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota 

County; Charles E. Roberts, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, 

Bartow, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Peter N. Koclanes, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
CERTIFICATIONS
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
quarterly report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers first fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 14, 2008/s/ Douglas C. MacLellan

Douglas C. MacLellanChief Executive Officer
 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA
                              FROM THE AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                              CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K AND IS 
                              QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                              CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000065873
<NAME>                        ALLTEL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            55,472
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    776,720
<ALLOWANCES>                                      29,121
<INVENTORY>                                       88,467
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 980,831
<PP&E>                                         8,233,338
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,405,270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,374,226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,206,508
<BONDS>                                        3,491,755
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              5,005
<PREFERRED>                                        9,121
<COMMON>                                         275,137
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,986,614
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,374,226
<SALES>                                          561,393
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,194,008
<CGS>                                            550,580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,304,982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  55,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               263,669
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  972,339
<INCOME-TAX>                                     446,864
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              525,475
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     524,537
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       1.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       1.89
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.B**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the annual report on Form10-K of Mercantile Bankshares Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31,2004, (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I,Terry L. Troupe, the Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to and forpurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Terry L. Troupe     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Terry L. Troupe         |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |
| Date: March 14, 2005    |

 

1

----
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Patricia G. Kriss, Chief Financial Officer of Entropin, Inc. (the "Company"),
do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         (a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 13, 2003

By:      /s/ Patricia G. Kriss
         -----------------------
         Patricia G. Kriss
         Chief Financial Officer
#### ISLANDS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-16022.

D.C. No. CV-96-01937-FCD.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Order filed June 5, 2000

Vacating the June 12, 2000

Oral Argument.

Submitted May 7, 2001.*

Decided May 11, 2001.

Before Chief Judge SCHROEDER, HAWKINS and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2).

ORDER **

The district court’s dismissal of this case is vacated in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in *Central Green Co. v. United States,*531 U.S. 425, 121 S.Ct. 1005, 148 L.Ed.2d 919 (2001), and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with that decision.

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. GRANVILLE L. HENDRICKSON

No. 492PA96

(Filed 6 June 1997)

Appeal by defendant pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(1) and on discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 124 N.C. App. 150, 476 S.E.2d 389 (1996), finding no error in an order entered on 20 April 1995 by Thompson, J., in Superior Court, Wake County, denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 May 1997.

*Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by William B. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellee.*

*John F. Oates, Jr., for defendant-appellant.*

PER CURIAM.

APPEAL DISMISSED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4782 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

120 East Illinois Avenue in Vinita, Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Francis C. 

Goodpaster Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2004 

Mr. CARSON of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 120 East Illinois Avenue in Vinita, Oklahoma, 

as the ‘‘Francis C. Goodpaster Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FRANCIS C. GOODPASTER POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 120 East Illinois Avenue in 

7 Vinita, Oklahoma, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Francis C. Goodpaster Post Office Building’’. 
2 

•HR 4782 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the Francis C. Goodpaster 

5 Post Office Building. 

Æ
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Robert Philip Tuerk, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 894 C.D. 2021

:

The Pennsylvania Department :

of Education, Bureau of School :

Leadership and Teacher Quality, :

Division of Certification Services, :

Respondent :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, May 1, 2023, upon consideration of Petitioner’s

application for reargument, the application is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4817 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4817

To facilitate the resolution of a minor boundary encroachment on lands 
of the Union Pacific Railroad Company in Tipton, California, which were 
 originally conveyed by the United States as part of the right-of-way 
      granted for the construction of transcontinental railroads.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2004

  Mr. Nunes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To facilitate the resolution of a minor boundary encroachment on lands 
of the Union Pacific Railroad Company in Tipton, California, which were 
 originally conveyed by the United States as part of the right-of-way 
      granted for the construction of transcontinental railroads.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELEASE OF UNITED STATES INTERESTS IN CERTAIN RAILROAD GRANT 
              LANDS IN TIPTON, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Release of Interests.--There is hereby released, without 
consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
and to that portion of the property located at 615 North Burnett Road 
in Tipton, California, which encroaches upon land that, subject to a 
reversionary interest, was conveyed by the United States pursuant to 
the Act of July 27, 1866 (14 Stat. 292) to facilitate the construction 
of transcontinental railroads.
    (b) Instrument of Release.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
execute and file in the appropriate office a deed of release, amended 
deed, or other appropriate instrument effectuating the release of 
interests made by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC UIT MARCH 31, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H]

I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 13056 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 0 6 - 0 0 4 6 3 - CR- 3 - M CR U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s D E N N I S S A N D E R S , a .k .a . N a th a n ie l S a n d e r s , a .k .a . D e n n is S . S a n d e r s , D e f e n d an t- A p p e llan t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe N orthe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( M ar c h 31, 2008) B efo re A N D E R S O N , B A R K E T T an dP R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M:2

G w endo l yn S pi vey, appo i nt ed coun se lfor D enni s S anders i n thi s app ea l , has m ov ed t o w i thd raw fr om further r epre se nt at i on of the appel l antand fi l ed a bri ef pur s ua ntt o A nde r s v. C a l i f orni a , 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 1396, 18 L . E d. 2d 4 9 3 (1 9 6 7 ). O u r in d ep en d en t rev iew o f th e e n ti re re co rd re v ea ls co u n se l’ s a s s e s s m e ntof

the r e l a t i ve m e r i tof

the appe a l i s c orr e c t . B e c aus e i nde pe nde nt ex am in atio n o f th e e n ti re re co rd re v ea ls n o ar g u ab le issu es o f m er it , co u n se l’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , an dS an d ers’ s sen t en ce i s A FFI R M ED .
11162.

#### Saggus *v.*Standard.

Decided May 12, 1920.

Distraint; from city court of Washington — Judge Wynne. November 25, 1919. •

*Colley & Colley,*for plaintiff in error.

*C. E. Sutton,*contra.

Jenkins, P. J.

While a defendant in a distress warrant proceeding may, without showing actual fraud, set up a claim arising from an alleged shortage in acreage, where he relies upon an alleged express warranty guaranteeing a specified acreage under the terms of the particular rent contract under which the distress warrant issued, still the rule is that a claim merely by way of set-off cannot be pleaded as against rent, and consequently another claim, seeking to recover an alleged overpayment made under a previous similar but independent contract, cannot be joined in such a defense. *McMahan*v. *Tyson,*23 *Ga.*43; *Johnston*v. *Patterson,*86 *Ga.*725 (13 S. E. 17).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.*
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15


United Companies Financial Corporation:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim consolidated
financial information of United Companies Financial Corporation and subsidiaries
for the periods ended June 30, 1998 and 1997, as indicated in our report dated
August 7, 1998; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on
that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998, is being
incorporated by reference in the following: Registration Statement No. 33-17366
on Form S-8 pertaining to the United Companies Financial Corporation Employees'
Savings Plan and Trust, Registration Statement No. 33-29994 on Form S-8
pertaining to the 1989 Stock Incentive Plan and the 1989 Non-Employee Director
Stock Option Plan, Registration Statement No. 33-54955 on Form S-8 pertaining to
the 1993 Stock Incentive Plan and the 1993 Non-Employee Director Stock Option
Plan, Registration Statement No. 33-68626 on Form S-3 pertaining to the
registration of 1,951,204 shares of United Companies Financial Corporation
Common Stock, Registration Statement No. 33-60367 on Form S-3 pertaining to the
registration of $200 million of United Companies Financial Corporation Debt
Securities and Preferred Stock, Registration Statement No. 33-52739 on Form S-3
pertaining to the registration of 200,000 shares of United Companies Financial
Corporation Common Stock, Registration Statement No. 33-63069 on Form S-8
pertaining to the United Companies Financial Corporation Management Incentive
Plan, Registration Statement No. 333-21985 on Form S-3 pertaining to the
registration of $500 million of United Companies Financial Corporation Debt
Securities, Preferred Stock and Common Stock and Registration Statement No.
333-33347 on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Plan and the 1996 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Baton Rouge, Louisiana
August 12, 1998
#### Elisha Gassaway *v.*D. F. Smith.

Husband and Wife — Ante-nuptial Contract.

'Wiiere an ante-nuptial contract provides, among other things, that the property of the wife shall remain as if the marriage had never taken place, it leaves no room.for construction, and excludes the husband from participating therein.

*447APPEAL FROM BARREN CIRCUIT COURT.

January 16, 1874.

*N. A. Smith, for appellant.*

-, *for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Haedin:

There is no allegation of any mistake in reducing to writing the terms of an ante-nuptial contract. If the only object Mrs. Morris had in view by its execution was to secure her property from her husband’s «'editors, this was accomplished without the additional clause in reference to the disposition of the property after her death. She seems, however, to have desired something more than to secure this property for her use during her life; and in the last clause of the instrument, having previously placed her property in a secure condition as against the husband or his creditors, the instrument reads: “It is further agreed and understood between all the parties that at the death of the said Eliza Ann, said property and its increase, or all that may remain, shall vest in her lawful heirs in the same manner as if this conveyance had not been made, or said marriage not taken place. No title vested in any one of her heirs during the life of Mrs. Morris, but at her death it passed to her lawful heirs as if she had died without ever having executed such a writing.”

If nothing more had been said, the husband would take as tenant by the curtesy, but the father, intending that the children of Mrs. Morris or her lawful heirs at her death should hold the property as she did, in express terms provides that the property shall pass as if the marriage has never taken place. This leaves no room for construction, and the plain language of the writing must govern. The execution of the deed by the sheriff can not in any manner control the construction of the marriage contract between the parties, and if permitted to affect their rights, evidences, as well as the marriage contract, an intention to exclude the husband. By that deed “the wife and her husband hold it free from the claims of John Morris, the husband, and all persons claiming under him.” The provisions of the deed are merely aluded to in response to the suggestions of counsel, and in nowise control the decision of the case. The object in making the deed was to perfect the title in the wife.-

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit No. 32.  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the report of Questar Gas Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ronald W. Jibson, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Richard J. Doleshek, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR GAS COMPANY    March 11, 2010 /s/Ronald W. Jibson Ronald W. Jibson President and Chief Executive Officer    March 11, 2010 /s/Richard J. Doleshek Richard J. Doleshek Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer