alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.4(b)


            Schedule of Warrant (refinancings after October 31, 2005)
         Issued by NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind on December 7, 2005


                        Expiration                                      Shares
      Grant Date           Date            Exercise Price              Granted
      ----------           ----            --------------              -------
       12/07/05          12/07/10        Greater of: (i) $0.0052;     16,000,000
                                         or (ii) the par value of
                                         NCT Group, Inc.
                                         common stock on the
                                         date of exercise
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         568,854
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               581,861
<PP&E>                                           7,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 589,724
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          811,318
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,755
<OTHER-SE>                                    (255,349)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   589,724
<SALES>                                         97,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,531
<CGS>                                           79,832
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               931,425
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               913,425
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (18,238)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (895,187)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (895,187)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
NIST PSCR RESEARCH INVESTMENTS BOLSTER 

CONNECTICUT’S ECONOMY 

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Public Safety 

Communications Research (PSCR) Division is the primary federal laboratory 

focused on conducting research, development, testing, and evaluation for 

public safety communications technologies. Their mission is to accelerate 

communications innovation in support of public safety communities and the 

citizens they serve. 

The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 allocated $300 Million 

from the Public Safety Trust fund to NIST PSCR to perform critical public safety 

communications R&D during a 10-year period. PSCR implemented numerous 

research mechanisms to support the development and deployment of the 

Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network: grants, Small Business Innovation 

Research (SBIR) contracts, prize challenge competitions, and internal research. 

These research mechanisms were housed within six research portfolios and crosscutting initiatives to maximize their impact: 

• User Interface/User Experience • Public Safety Analytics 

• Location-Based Services • Security 

• Mission Critical Voice • Resilient Systems 

While the ultimate impact of these research mechanisms is the increased safety 

of first responders and their communities through improved communications 

technologies, PSCR was interested in better understanding how their R&D 

investments to date result in economic impacts that ripple outward to state 

economies. An independent analysis was conducted to demonstrate how PSCR’s 

deployment of the $300 Million from the Public Safety Trust Fund translated into 

broader impacts to the United States, including jobs, earnings, value added, and 

total economic output. PSCR’s R&D investments resulted in economic output 

in 33 of the 50 states. Results of the analysis are presented here. 

For more information, see NIST PSCR’s Economic Impact Study. 

1 Grant Award 

Totaling $0.2 Million 

Enfield Fire District No 1

1 Prize Challenge 

Participant 

Awards Totaling 

$0.02 Million 

CONNECTICUT BY THE NUMBERS 

NIST INVESTMENT 

$0.2 Million 

OUTPUT 

$0.4 Million 

VALUE-ADDED 

$0.7 Million 

EARNINGS 

$0.4 Million 

JOBS 

5 

Output: the total value of economic 

activity circulating through the U.S. 

economy generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Value-Added: how much the 

combined U.S. state economies 

grew over a period of time due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments

Earnings: the change in household 

earnings in the U.S. economy 

generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Jobs: the change in the number of 

full- and part-time jobs generated 

by each one million dollar change 

in U.S. economic activity due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments

*All dollar amounts presented 

in 2022 and reflect data as of 

October 2022.

**All values are rounded; thus, the 

sum of the components may not 

sum exactly to the NIST Investment 

For additional information of PSCR’s research programs, visit https://www.nist.gov/ctl/pscr. 

amount.
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March      20, 2008 |                                                |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                                |
|                                 | /s/ A. F.  Petrocelli                               |
|                                 | A.      F. Petrocelli                               |
|                                 | Chairman,      President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |

----
10809.

#### Gardner *v.*Commercial City Bank.

Decided December 9, 1919.

Complaint; from city court of Amerieus—Judge Harper. June 8, 1919.

*Shipp & Sheppard,*for plaintiff in error.

*Wallis & Fort,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds; there was an acute conflict in the evidence as to whether the defendant executed the note sued upon, but the finding of the jury that she did was authorized, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Dulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1



                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-49239) pertaining to the UNIFAB International, Inc. Long-Term
Incentive Plan and Restricted Stock Agreements with Certain Employees of our
report dated April 28, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of UNIFAB International, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended March 31, 1998.



                                                          Ernst & Young LLP

New Orleans, Louisiana
June 26, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            3754
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10258
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1103)
<INVENTORY>                                       5173
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 43990<F1>
<PP&E>                                           24979
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (20351)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   49352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            24532
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       6098
<COMMON>                                         99779
<OTHER-SE>                                     (81093)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     49352
<SALES>                                          17508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 17508
<CGS>                                            16665
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    46058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (393)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (28943)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (28943)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (30846)<F2>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.80)
<FN>
<F1>net assets held for sale 25,130
<F2>deemed dividends on preferred stock (1903)
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
AO 440 (Rev. 05/00) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL CASE

CASE NUMBER:

V. ASSIGNED JUDGE:

DESIGNATED 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE:

TO: (Name and address of Defendant)

YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to serve upon PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY (name and address)

an answer to the complaint which is herewith served upon you, days after service of this

summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for

the relief demanded in the complaint. You must also file your answer with the Clerk of this Court within a reasonable

period of time after service.

THOMAS G. BRUTON, CLERK

(By) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Case: 1:20-cv-05016 Document #: 10 Filed: 11/12/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:51
RETURN OF SERVICE

Service of the Summons and complaint was made by me(1)

DATE

NAME OF SERVER (PRINT) TITLE

 Check one box below to indicate appropriate method of service

G Served personally upon the defendant. Place where served:

G Left copies thereof at the defendant’s dwelling house or usual place of abode with a person of suitable age and

discretion then residing therein.

Name of person with whom the summons and complaint were left:

G Returned unexecuted:

G Other (specify):

STATEMENT OF SERVICE FEES

TRAVEL SERVICES TOTAL

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information 

contained in the Return of Service and Statement of Service Fees is true and correct.

Executed on

Date Signature of Server

Address of Server

(1) As to who may serve a summons see Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

AO 440 (Rev. 05/00) Summons in a Civil Action

Case: 1:20-cv-05016 Document #: 10 Filed: 11/12/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:52
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14

                                 LEASE AMENDMENT

                              VISTA RESOURCES, INC.




              FASKEN CENTER, LTD., a Texas Limited Partnership, (hereinafter
called "Lessor") and VISTA RESOURCES, INC., (hereinafter called "Lessee"),
regarding that certain Lease Agreement dated October 23, 1996, covering
approximately 6,000 square feet of Net Rentable Area located on Level Seven (7)
of Two Fasken Center at 550 West Texas Avenue, Midland, Texas 79701, also known
as Suite 700, do hereby amend said document under the following terms and
conditions:

         1.   Lessor and Lessee agree to expand the Leased Premises to include
              an additional 1,505 square feet of Net Rentable Area as indicated
              on the attached floor plan identified as Exhibit "A".

         2.   The lease term for this expansion shall be five (5) years
              commencing on September 1, 1997 and expiring on August 31, 2002.

         3.   The rental for the expansion space shall be Fifty-Six Thousand
              Four Hundred Thirty-Seven and 50/100 Dollars ($56,437.50) payable
              in Sixty (60) installments of Nine Hundred Forty and 63/100
              Dollars ($940.63).

         4.   Lessee shall have an additional four (4) contract parking spaces
              located in the parking garage at no additional cost.

         5.   Lessor and Lessee agree to split equally all finish-out costs for
              the expansion space up to $10,000.00. All finish-out costs above
              $10,000.00 shall be at Lessee's sole expense.

         EXCEPT as hereby expressly amended, Lessor and Lessee do hereby ratify
and affirm all of the terms, conditions and covenants of said Lease Agreement.



         WITNESS the execution hereby this the 18th day of September, 1997.



FASKEN CENTER, LTD.                                     VISTA RESOURCES, INC.
a Texas Limited Partnership

By:    550 Texas, Inc., General Partner
       a Texas Corporation



<PAGE>   2




By:  /s/ Wendell L. Brown, Jr.      By:  /s/ C. Randall Hill
   -----------------------------       -----------------------------------------
Name:    Wendell L. Brown, Jr.        Name:  C. Randall Hill
    ----------------------------         ---------------------------------------
Title:  Vice President              Title:  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
      --------------------------          --------------------------------------
Exhibit 10.x




Date: August 31, 2011
  Howard J. Rubin, Esq.
 Davis & Gilbert LLP
 1740 Broadway
 New York, NY 10019
  Dear Mr. Rubin,
  This will confirm that, notwithstanding the provision in paragraph 3(a) of the Separation Agreement dated August 25, 2011, that specifies a payment to Ms. Hamilton of $525,000, the Company will instead pay to Ms. Hamilton on the date fixed for such payment an amount equal to $550,000 in recognition of the fact that the latter amount represented her current annual base salary at the date of the Separation Agreement.
  Sincerely yours,
  
  Louis L. Ainsworth
 Interim General Counsel
 
 c:
Joseph W. Armbrust, Sidley & Austin
 Bob Ries, MTS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,102
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  491,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (54,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  6,180,002
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,809,548
<PP&E>                                       9,579,205
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,329,526)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,691,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,657,022
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,815,972
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,691,320
<SALES>                                      1,257,421
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,257,421
<CGS>                                          634,369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  634,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               592,322
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             119,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (80,470)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (80,470)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (80,470)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
#### Martin HASTINGS, as Member and on behalf of Local 1, Elevator Constructors AFL-CIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John G. GREEN, Edward J. Smith, Jr., Charles Novak, Brian Kelly, Walter Burke, Anthony Orrigo, Robert Shannon, Defendants-Cross-Defendants-Appellees, Fidelity and Deposit Company, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellee.

Docket No. 00-7175.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 11, 2001.

Martin Hastings, Commack, NY, pro se. Richard H. Markowitz, Markowitz *&*Rich-man, N.Y., NY, for appellees Green, Smith, Novak, Kelly, Orrigo, and Shannon. Lewis Stockman, Stockman Wallach Lentz & Gamell, N.Y., NY, for appellee Fidelity & Deposit Co.

Present MESKILL, KEARSE, and SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and was argued by appellant *pro se*and by counsel appearing for appellees.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Glasser’s Memorandum and Order dated December 30, 1999. Plaintiffs brief on appeal provides no basis for overturning the district court’s decision.

We have considered all of plaintiffs contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4632 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4632

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
19504 Linden Boulevard in St. Albans, New York, as the ``Archie Spigner 
                         Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 19504 
Linden Boulevard in St. Albans, New York, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Archie Spigner Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Archie Spigner Post Office 
Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Unassociated Document


    
      AMENDMENT
        TO INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE LEASE

      


      This
        Amendment shall pertain to that
        certain Industrial Real Estate Lease dated May 1, 1990 executed as between
        GERALD BASHAW(“LANDLORD”) and MODTECH HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware
        Corporation(“TENANT”). The parties hereto hereby expressly acknowledge that good
        and valuable consideration has been mutually given and received in exchange
        for
        their consent to the amendments contained herein.

      


      This
        Amendment shall specifically
        supersede and amend all conflicting terms set forth within the above-referenced
        Lease, the terms and conditions of which are hereby incorporated by this
        reference. All other terms and conditions of said Lease shall remain in full
        force and affect, except as specifically agreed to and modified
        herein.

      


      Section
        1.04 in amended such that the
        only property hereafter being leased is as follows: that certain group of
        Parcels 8, 9, 10 and 11 on the Parcel map attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, which
        have been circled and marked collectively Parcel “2”.

      


      Section
        1.12 is hereby amended such
        that BASE RENT shall be at the rate of $700.00 per acre of property leased
        hereby.

      


      Said
        amendments are hereby agreed to as
        of the date of execution of this document, with the operative date of the
        change
        in rental property description and rental rate being the first day of January,
        2006. It is anticipated that the parties may agree in writing to a further
        extension of said effective date, but that in no event shall the extended
        operative date extend beyond February 1, 2006.

       

       

      
        	
                 

                 

                Dated:
                  11/1/05

              	
                "LANDLORD"

                 

                By: /s/ Gerald Bashaw

                      Gerald Bashaw

                 

                "TENANT"

                MODTECH HOLDINGS, INC., a

                Delaware Corporation

                 

              
	
                 

                Dated:
                  11/28/05

              	
                 

                By:
                  /s/ Dennis L. Shogren

                 

                Its:
                  CFO