alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF CNL INCOME FUND VI, LTD. AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND ITS STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO THE FORM 10-Q OF CNL INCOME FUND VI, LTD. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       5,502,039<F2>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  266,657
<ALLOWANCES>                                   260,175
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      18,327,471
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,163,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,117,325
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,966,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,117,325
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,172,280
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  631,411
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,734,120
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,734,120
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,734,120
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>DUE TO THE NATURE OF ITS INDUSTRY, CNL INCOME FUND VI, LTD. HAS AN
UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET; THEREFORE, NO VALUES ARE SHOWN ABOVE FOR CURRENT
ASSETS AND CURRENT LIABILITIES.
<F2>INCLUDES $4,380,164 IN RESTRICTED CASH.
</FN>





</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6045

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-262) Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lloyd George Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Lloyd George Maxwell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Maxwell , No. CR-93-262 (E.D. Va. Dec. 15, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
AO 245D (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations (10237)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE

V. (For Revocation of Supervised Release)

CURTIS LEWIS CASE NUMBER: 1:09-CR-00027-001

USM NUMBER: 10588-003

THE DEFENDANT: Christopher Knight, Esquire

Defendant's Attorney

admitted guilt to violation of supervision condition: 7 as set forth in the Petition dated 

8/26/2015.

was found in violation of supervision condition: 

Violation Number Nature of Violation

Date violation

Occurred

 7 Technical

The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 2 of this judgment. The sentence is 

imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.

The defendant has not violated condition(s) and is discharged as to such violation(s) 

condition.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States Attorney for this 

district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, 

costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid.

Defendant's Social Security No. 0221

Defendant's Date of Birth: 1980

Defendant's Residence Address:

Uniontown, AL

__________________________

Defendant's Mailing Address:

___________________________

___________________________

September 14, 2015

Date of Imposition of Judgment

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

September 16, 2015

Date

X

Case 1:09-cr-00027-CG-M Document 56 Filed 09/16/15 Page 1 of 2
Judgment 2

AO 245D (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations: Sheet 2 - Imprisonment

Defendant: ERNEST JERMAINE STEVENSON

Case Number: 2:11-CR-00360-001

IMPRISONMENT

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be 

imprisoned for a total term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS.

The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons: That the 

defendant be imprisoned at an institution where a substance abuse treatment program is 

available.

The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district:

at .m. on .

as notified by the United States Marshal.

The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau 

of Prisons:

before 2 p.m. on .

as notified by the United States Marshal.

as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office.

RETURN

I have executed this judgment as follows:

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

Defendant delivered on to at __________________

with a certified copy of this judgment.

 UNITED STATES MARSHAL 

By ________________________________

 Deputy U.S. Marshal

X

X

Case 1:09-cr-00027-CG-M Document 56 Filed 09/16/15 Page 2 of 2
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

ISSUE DATE:

February 13, 2023

LAB BULLETIN

NUMBER: LB-148-2023

LAP: Efficiency of 

Electric Motors

SUBJECT: Addition of IEC 60034-2-3:2020 and IEC 61800-9-2:2017 to the Efficiency of 

Electric Motors Laboratory Accreditation Program (LAP)

The purpose of this bulletin is to notify laboratories that additional methods have been added to 

the Efficiency of Electric Motors (EEM) LAP.

NVLAP is adding the following test methods to the Efficiency of Electric Motors laboratory 

accreditation program:

• IEC 60034-2-3:2020 - Rotating Electrical Machines - Part 2-3: Specific Test Methods for 

Determining Losses and Efficiency of Converter-fed AC Motors;

- NVLAP will only accredit to testing defined in sections 6.2 and/or 6.3. NVLAP will 

not accredit to testing based on modeling defined in sections 6.4 and 6.5. 

Laboratories are expected to comply with all applicable sections of the standard 

whichever testing method is used.

• IEC 61800-9-2:2017 - Adjustable Speed Electrical Power Drive Systems - Part 9-2: 

Ecodesign for Power Drive Systems, Motor Starters, Power Electronics and Their Driven 

Applications - Energy Efficiency Indicators for Power Drive Systems and Motor Starters.

- NVLAP will only accredit to testing defined in sections 7.7 and/or 7.9. NVLAP will 

not accredit to testing based on modeling defined in section 7.5. Laboratories are 

expected to comply with all applicable sections of the standard whichever testing 

method is used.

An onsite assessment is required to add either method to a scope of accreditation. This review can 

be performed as part of a biennial assessment, or an assessment can be scheduled specifically for 

the review of scope additions. 

These methods are now available for selection in the NIWS Lab Portal. Laboratories interested in 

having these methods added to their scope of accreditation should access the lab portal and select 

the desired methods for addition.

Questions should be directed to Tim Rasinski at 301-975-6697 or timothy.rasinski@nist.gov.

NVLAP LAB BULLETIN NUMBER: LB-148-2023 PAGE: 1 of 1
should enable easier conversion to the newer CSF 2.0. 

e. Simpler is better. Consider running the CSF through Flesch Kincaid analysis (available 

in MS Word) for targeting better readability and lower grade level objectives – continue 

to reduce the number of subcategories, and intentionally focus on plain language 

where possible. 

f. Additionally, the increased of information and explanations of each subcategory is a 

much-needed improvement. 

3. Where there are no mappings to the previous version CSF 1.1, we recommend additional 

information or explanations in a note to help the user understand why this is new and 

what is the intended purpose (addressing cyber insurance, improving supply chain 

management, introduction of ethics into strategy thinking...). 

4. We would also recommend additional notes are added to address why categories and 

subcategories were added, realigned, dropped, or renamed. 

Thank you again for the opportunity to provide our feedback, and we look forward to seeing more 

and continuing to partnering with NIST over the next several months and seeing the eventual launch 

of CSF 2.0. Please let us know if there is anything else we can help with. 

Ron Lear, CHMLA, LSSGB, ISO Lead Auditor 

Vice President, Frameworks and Models
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4620 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4620

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To confirm the authority of the Secretary of Agriculture to collect 
 approved State commodity assessments on behalf of the State from the 
                proceeds of marketing assistance loans.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4620

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To confirm the authority of the Secretary of Agriculture to collect 
 approved State commodity assessments on behalf of the State from the 
                proceeds of marketing assistance loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE TO 
              COLLECT STATE COMMODITY ASSESSMENTS.

    (a) Collection From Marketing Assistance Loans.--The Secretary of 
Agriculture may collect commodity assessments from the proceeds of a 
marketing assistance loan for a producer if the assessment is required 
to be paid by the producer or the first purchaser of a commodity 
pursuant to a State law or pursuant to an authority administered by the 
Secretary. This collection authority does not extend to a State tax or 
other revenue collection activity by a State.
    (b) Collection Pursuant to Agreement.--The collection of an 
assessment under subsection (a) shall be made as specified in an 
agreement between the Secretary of Agriculture and the State requesting 
the collection.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 5, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4773 

To define marriage for all legal purposes in the District of Columbia to 

consist of the union of one man and one woman. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 7, 2004 

Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To define marriage for all legal purposes in the District 

of Columbia to consist of the union of one man and 

one woman. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MARRIAGE IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. 

4 In the District of Columbia, for all legal purposes, 

5 ‘‘marriage’’ means the union of one man and one woman. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         550,331
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  939,983
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,507,646
<PP&E>                                       4,459,406
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,487,640
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,108,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,686,169
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       237,945
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,985,636
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,515,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,108,712
<SALES>                                      4,708,153
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,708,153
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,347,507
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,527,577
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             360,965
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                504,758
<INCOME-TAX>                                (2,620,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,124,758
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,124,758
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05 
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                     9617085
<SECURITIES>                               2690620
<RECEIVABLES>                              29746
<ALLOWANCES>                               12500
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           12363810
<PP&E>                                     3021145
<DEPRECIATION>                             1754261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             24084577
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      671434
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   3051004
<OTHER-SE>                                 14237870
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               24084577
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           3274771
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           1974720
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1202374
<INCOME-TAX>                               364550
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        837824
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               837824
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              .97
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .97

</TABLE>
| (1)   | the      Quarterly Report of Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the      quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|            |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |

| (2)   | information      contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the      financial condition and results of operations of Willamette Valley      Vineyards, Inc. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 15, 2010 | By:    |  /s/      James W. Bernau     |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   | Name: James      W. Bernau                             |   |
|                         |   | Title:   Chief      Executive Officer   |   |

----
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00274-CR

Sean Eric Griffin

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas

Trial Cause No. S-19-3408CR

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 17, 2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. 23 - 0724 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MADISON WILLIAM MINER,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 5 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 29 2024

04/29/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0724
Executive Order 13682

# Closing of Executive Departments and Agencies of the Federal Government on Friday, December 26, 2014

By the authority vested in me as President of the United States of America, by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:

**Section 1**                        . All executive branch departments and agencies of the Federal Government shall be closed and their employees excused from duty on Friday, December 26, 2014, the day after Christmas Day, except as provided in section 2 of this order.                    

**Sec. 2**                        . The heads of executive branch departments and agencies may determine that certain offices and installations of their organizations, or parts thereof, must remain open and that certain employees must report for duty on December 26, 2014, for reasons of national security, defense, or other public need.                    

**Sec. 3**                        . Friday, December 26, 2014, shall be considered as falling within the scope of Executive Order 11582 of February 11, 1971, and of 5 U.S.C. 5546 and 6103(b) and other similar statutes insofar as they relate to the pay and leave of employees of the United States.                    

**Sec. 4**                        . The Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall take such actions as may be necessary to implement this order.                    

**Sec. 5**                        .                         *General Provisions.*                         (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:                    

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

[FR Doc. 2014-29121

Billing code 3295-F5
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: KEVIN BOYER,

Relator. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 14

- 00182

- CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The court has considered this cause on the Relator = s petition for writ of mandamus

against the Honorable Richard Roman, formerly sitting as Judge of the 346th District Court of

El Paso, Texas, and concludes that Relator = s petition for writ of mandamus should b e denied.

We therefore deny the petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this

court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2014.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.