alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

URVE MAGGITTI,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 117 MM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4

th day of January, 2024, the “Petition for Writ of Prohibition 

alternatively Petition for Writ of Certiorari and Emergency Injunction for Stay” is DENIED.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income  Fund V, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30,  2003 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





Date:   August 8, 2003                   /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                         Title: President and Treasurer


                                         A  signed   original  of  this  written
                                         statement  required  by Section 906 has
                                         been  provided  to CNL  Income  Fund V,
                                         Ltd. and will be retained by CNL Income
                                         Fund  V,  Ltd.  and  furnished  to  the
                                         Securities  and Exchange  Commission or
                                         its staff upon request.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 19

- 00263

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellant
v.
TAYLOR ANN RADKE , Appellee

From the County Court Limestone County, Texas Trial Court No. 39104

A B A T E M E N T ORDER

The State moves to abate th is appeal and to remand to the trial court for entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The State request ed findings of fact and conclusions of law after the trial court granted Defendant Taylor Ann Radke’s motions to suppress. Although approximately two months have passed since the State filed its request, the trial court has not entered findi ngs of fact and conclusions of law. When the losing party on a motion to suppress requests findings of fact and conclusions of law, the trial court must issue them in order for the court of appeals toState v. Radke Page 2

properly review the trial court’s ruling. State v. Oa ges , 210 S.W.3d 643, 644 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); State v. Cullen , 195 S.W.3d 696, 698

- 99 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We grant the State’s motion to abate . This appeal is abate d to enable the trial court to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law rega rding the granting of Radke’s Motion

to Suppress Physical Evidence and Motion to Suppress Defendant’s Statements. The trial court shall, within twenty (20) days from the date of this order: (1) make appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law; an d (2) deliver the findings of fact

and conclusions of law to the trial court clerk. The trial court clerk shall: (1) prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law that the trial court renders; and (2) file the supplemental clerk’s record with the Clerk of this Court within forty

- five (45) days after

the date of this order. The Appellant’s brief will be due thirty (30) days after the supplemental clerk’s record is filed. The Appellee’s brief will be due th irty (30) days after the Appellant’s brief

is filed.

PER CURIAM

B efore Chief Justice Gray , Justice Davis , and Justice Neill Motion gr anted; case abated and remanded Or der issued and filed October 2, 2019 Do not publish RWR
Monte-Carlo Exploration of Focused 

Neutron Guide and Monochromator 

Geometries

Samantha Isaac

Mentor: Leland Harriger
New Cold Source

• A new cold source 

will be replacing 

the current cold 

source

• This produces 

most of the cold 

neutrons used at 

the NCNR
Replacing NG5 and SPINS
Replacing NG5 and SPINS
Replacing NG5 and SPINS

LEAF

CAMEA
Primary Spectrometer
Software used

• Mcstas

• http://www.mcstas.org/

• Guide_bot_distribution

• Courtesy of Mads Bertelsen

• iFit

• NCNR Rocks Cluster
NG5

• NG5 is a 41 meter long straight rectangular guide

• Neutron guides contain coatings that line the inner 

walls that allow the neutrons to bounce down the 

guide

• Coated in Ni58
Momentum Transfer

• The momentum 

and collision 

angle determine 

the momentum 

transfer (Q)
Guide Coatings

• Increasing m-value is one way of increasing flux

Source: Swiss Neutronics
Ballistic Ellipse

• Use a ballistic elliptical geometry 

• Each neutron should ideally only bounce once 

down the guide





Ballistic Ellipse
NG5 Baseline

2.3 meV: 1.5e8 Flux , 30% brilliance transfer

17 meV: 1.6e8 Flux , 6% brilliance transfer

2
Ballistic Ellipse

2.3 meV: 5e8 Flux , 80% brilliance transfer

17 meV: 11e8 Flux , 45% brilliance transfer
Monochromator Optimization

White Beam

Single Energy
Mosaic Optimization
Mosaic Optimization

• Historically 30 minutes 

has been used
Flat Monochromator

10 cm^2
Doubly Focusing Monochromator

Source: Johns Hopkins University
Vertical Focusing

• Use Lens Maker Eqn. to 

place and rotate individual 

blades

Sample
Horizontal Focusing

• Blade group 

lays tangent 

to Rowland 

circle
Source Image
Source Image

• The focal 

point of the 

elliptical 

guide is NOT 

where the 

source image 

is produced
Monochromator Results
Future Plans

• Compare intensities at sample position 

of flat monochromator with optimized 

focused monochromator.

•Integrate the monochromator into 

guide optimization

• Vary the m-value of the coating along 

the ellipse

• Build the best guide/spectrometer ever
Acknowledgments

•Leland Harriger

•Mads Bertelson

•Jeff Lynn

•Julie Borchers, Joe Dura, and all 

SURF Directors

•NSF and CHRNS
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4653 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4653

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the medical 
expenses of a child with special needs shall be allowable as a medical 
  expense deduction without regard to the 7.5 percent adjusted gross 
                           income threshold.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2004

 Mr. Tancredo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the medical 
expenses of a child with special needs shall be allowable as a medical 
  expense deduction without regard to the 7.5 percent adjusted gross 
                           income threshold.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Compassionate Assistance for Parents 
with Children with Special Needs Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME THRESHOLD IN MEDICAL EXPENSE DEDUCTION 
              NOT TO APPLY TO MEDICAL EXPENSES FOR CHILDREN WITH 
              SPECIAL NEEDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 213 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to medical, dental, etc., expenses) is amended by adding at 
the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Adjusted Gross Income Threshold Not To Apply to Expenses for 
Children With Special Needs.--
            ``(1) In general.--The adjusted gross income threshold in 
        subsection (a) shall not apply to expenses for the medical care 
        of a child with special needs.
            ``(2) Child with special needs.--For purposes of paragraph 
        (1), the term `child with special needs' means any dependent of 
        the taxpayer--
                    ``(A) who has not attained the age of 18 as of the 
                close of the calendar year in which the taxable year of 
                the taxpayer begins, and
                    ``(B) who is considered to be disabled under 
                section 1614(a)(3) of the Social Security Act.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              61
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        211
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,332
<PP&E>                                          37,350
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,301
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,978
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,308
<BONDS>                                          5,408
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,720
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,978
<SALES>                                         11,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,464
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 403
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,520
<INCOME-TAX>                                       958
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,562
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,562
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>



                                               



<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>  This schedule contains summary
financial information extracted from Key
Plastics, Inc.'s financial statements
for the period ended September 30, 1996
and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such statements.
<MULTIPLIER>                           1
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                 SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                 0
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                 41,244,226
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                   29,823,877
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              73,135,361
<PP&E>                        78,614,896
<DEPRECIATION>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               157,644,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         58,228,962
<BONDS>                                0
<COMMON>                          94,862
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<OTHER-SE>                   (14,477,978)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 157,644,540
<SALES>                       52,883,090
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              52,883,090
<CGS>                         43,090,480
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 43,090,480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             3,750,920
<INCOME-PRETAX>                1,768,822 
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            1,768,822 
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                   1,768,822
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       5.33  
<EPS-DILUTED>                       5.33


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 17

- 00204

- CV

IN RE Abel Alvarado CASILLAS and Premier Eagle Ford Services, Inc.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 26, 2017

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On April 5, 2017, Relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for stay. The

court has considered the petition and is of the opinion Relators are not entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for stay are denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

.

P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding a rises out of Cause No. 2013

- CVT

- 000742

- D2, styled Ruben Gonzalez v. Abel Casillas & Premier Eagle Ford Services, Inc. , pending in the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Monica Z. Notzon presiding.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4336 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4336

 To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 
the operation of the Medicare comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program 
                      in the District of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2004

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 
the operation of the Medicare comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program 
                      in the District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON OPERATION OF MEDICARE COMPARATIVE COST 
              ADJUSTMENT (CCA) PROGRAM IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    Section 1860C-1(b)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-
29(b)(2)), as added by section 241(a) of the Medicare Prescription 
Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173), 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) No part in the district of columbia.--No part 
                of the MSA is in the District of Columbia.''.
                                 <all>
```
NIST Centers of Excellence Program 

Purpose and Overview

Susan Ballou

The NIST Centers of Excellence expand 

NIST’s impact and mission delivery by 

enabling NIST to partner with foremost 

experts in critical technical areas
Current NIST Centers of Excellence

• CHiMaD - Center for 

Hierarchical Materials and 

Design (January 2014)

• Center for Risk-Based 

Community Resilience Planning 

(February 2015)

• CSAFE - Center for Statistics 

and Applications in Forensic 

Evidence (May 2015)
NIST Centers of Excellence Program 

Purpose and Overview

• Enable collaborations between NIST and leading 

research institutions in emerging technology areas 

to help NIST meet mission needs in new or 

expanding areas of strategic focus

• Enhance technical innovation through early 

alignment of measurement science with emerging 

fields of research

• Provide new opportunities for training of students 

and postdocs in measurement science

• Provide greater opportunities for NIST to engage 

with entrepreneurs and with industry
Programmatic Evaluation

• Does COE complement NIST programs

• Are the accomplishments and planned future 

objectives aligned with NIST goals and objectives

• Has the COE fostered and expanded expertise in 

this technical area

• Has the COE succeeded in engaging 

underrepresented minorities

• Development of new students and postdocs and 

their impact on NIST
Plans for Review of the CoE Program

• CoEs will be evaluated at year 5 to determine whether to 

extend the award or move in a new direction

• Robust process needed to evaluate quality, effectiveness, 

and value of partnership to determine continued 

investment

• Formal technical and operational reviews and site visits 

by NIST and external panels

• Performance during initial award period

• Quality of proposed plan for future period

• Alignment with NIST programmatic priorities

• Effectiveness of collaboration
Specific CSAFE Challenges

• New and scientifically sound probabilistic and 

statistical methods to quantify uncertainties 

associated with collection, analyses and 

interpretation of pattern and digital evidence

• Tools to train stakeholders (law enforcement, 

crime labs, judges, lawyers, etc.) in the 

application of these new approaches

• New generation of students prepared to enter 

the workforce with a knowledge of these skills 

and expertise.
NIST Scientists Involved with the 

Forensic CoE Program

• Lead: Susan Ballou

• Div 602 – Rich Cavanagh, John Butler, Reva Schwartz, Melissa 

Taylor, Robert Thompson, Shannan Williams 

• Div 770 – Martin Herman

• Div 774 – Michael Garris, Elham Tabassi, Yooyoung Lee

• Div 775 – Barbara Guttman, James Lyle, Richard Ayers

• Div 776 – Will Guthrie, Simone Gittelson, Steve Lund, Hari 

Lyer

• Div 683 – Richard Silver, Brian Renegar, John Song, Johannes 

Soons, Alan Zheng
PLEASE WELCOME

Dr. Alicia Carriquiry; 

Distinguished Professor, 

Director, CSAFE
Order entered April 7, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00211

- CR

VINCENT BARRON JACINTO , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 194t h Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F

- 1730618

- M

O RDER

Before the Court is the State’s second motion for extension of time to file its

brief

. We GRANT the motion. We ORDER the brief received on April 6, 2022,

filed as of t he date of this order.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL PRESIDING JUSTICE
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4786

To provide grants to tribes to assist those tribes in participating in the 

Federal acknowledgement process. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2004

Mr. PALLONE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To provide grants to tribes to assist those tribes in 

participating in the Federal acknowledgement process.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GRANTS TO ASSIST TRIBES IN THE FEDERAL 

4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT PROCESS. 

5 (a) GRANTS.—The Secretary of the Interior may pro6 vide a grant to an entity to assist the entity in preparing, 

7 submitting, or otherwise supporting a petition to the Bu8 reau of Acknowledgement and Recognition in the Depart9 ment of the Interior for recognition or rerecognition of 

10 such entity as an Indian tribe. 
2

•HR 4786 IH 

1 (b) AMOUNT.—The Secretary may not provide a 

2 grant to an entity under this section in an amount that 

3 exceeds $500,000 in any fiscal year. 

4 (c) OUTSIDE FINANCING.—

5 (1) PROHIBITION.—

6 (A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may not 

7 provide a grant under this section to an entity 

8 unless the entity agrees that it will not accept 

9 funds to assist in the Federal acknowledgement 

10 process from any other source that may benefit 

11 financially from the recognition or rerecognition 

12 of the entity as an Indian tribe. 

13 (B) PENALTIES.—If the Secretary deter14 mines that an entity has violated the require15 ment of subparagraph (A), the Secretary—

16 (i) may not provide any additional as17 sistance under this section to the entity; 

18 and 

19 (ii) shall seek reimbursement from the 

20 entity in an amount equal to amounts re21 ceived under a grant provided under this 

22 section plus reasonable interest. 

23 (2) PRIOR ACCEPTANCE OF FUNDS.—The Sec24 retary may not provide a grant under this section to 

25 an entity that has accepted funds from a source that 
3

•HR 4786 IH 

1 may benefit financially from the recognition or rerec2 ognition of the entity as an Indian tribe until one 

3 year after the date on which the entity accepted the 

4 funds. 

5 (3) WAIVER.—The Secretary may waive the 

6 penalty requirements contained in clauses (i) and (ii) 

7 of paragraph (1)(B) or the one-year waiting period 

8 requirement contained in paragraph (2), as the case 

9 may be, if the Secretary determines that the entity 

10 has returned the total amount of funds received 

11 from all sources that may benefit financially from 

12 the recognition or rerecognition of the entity as an 

13 Indian tribe. 

14 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

15 (1) INDIAN TRIBE.—The term ‘‘Indian tribe’’ 

16 has the meaning given the term in section 4 of the 

17 Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance 

18 Act (25 U.S.C. 450b). 

19 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

20 the Secretary of the Interior.

Æ