alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Unaudited.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                              APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                          289,798
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    14,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    (4,600)
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                610,886
<PP&E>                                                       11,138,429
<DEPRECIATION>                                              (3,791,608)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                8,082,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           213,741
<BONDS>                                                       8,391,840
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  8,082,919
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                984,293
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   410,075
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                211,665
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              375,630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 779,020
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    765,943
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     78.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0




</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4802 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4802

   To require information on railroad tank cars containing hazardous 
             materials to be available to first responders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2004

  Mr. Meehan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require information on railroad tank cars containing hazardous 
             materials to be available to first responders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Responsible Railroads Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    Chapter 51 of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in section 5111--
                    (A) by inserting ``(a) Air Brake Equipment.--'' 
                before ``A rail tank car''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following new 
                subsection:
    ``(b) Information for First Responders.--
            ``(1) Prohibition.--No rail tank car containing hazardous 
        materials may be transported or stored on rail tracks that are 
        part of or connected to the general system of railroad 
        transportation unless information identifying the tank car, the 
        hazardous materials within such tank car, and response guidance 
        is immediately available to local first responders in each 
        location where the tank car may be located. Such information 
        shall be provided through the Operation Respond Institute's 
        technology or similar technology. Each day in which a tank car 
        is transported or stored in violation of this paragraph shall 
        constitute a separate violation.
            ``(2) Exception.--The Secretary of Transportation may 
        provide an exception to the prohibition under paragraph (1) if 
        no data base exists through which the requirement can be 
        met.''; and
            (2) in section 5124, by adding at the end the following: 
        ``This section shall not apply to a violation of section 
        5111(b) or a regulation prescribed or order issued under such 
        subsection.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 2 shall take effect 90 days after 
the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 15

- 00241

- CV

IN RE Deborah Lindsey PARHAM

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 29, 2015

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On April 21, 2015

, relator Deborah Lindsey Parham filed a petition for writ of mandamus

and a motion for emergency stay pending a ruling on the mandamus petition. The court has

considered the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the

relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for emergency stay

are denied

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013

- PC

- 3933, styled In the Guardianship of Juanita E. Byrd, An Incapacitated Person , pending in the Probate Court No

. 1, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Kelly M. Cross presiding.
<PAGE>   1













                                   EXHIBIT 21


<PAGE>   2

                                                                     EXHIBIT 21

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF FRESH FOODS, INC.

<TABLE>
<S>                                                               <C>
Brunswick Associates, Inc. (GA)                                   Chardent, Inc. (DE)

Claremont Restaurant Group, LLC (NC)                              D & S Foods, LLC (GA)

Elloree Foods, Inc. (SC)                                          Fresh Foods of North Carolina, LLC (NC)

Fresh Foods Properties, LLC (NC)                                  Georgia WSMP, Inc. (GA)

Georgia Buffet Restaurants, Inc. (GA) 50% owned                   Kingsport Foods, Inc. (TN)

Knoxville Foods, Inc. (TN)                                        Matthews Prime Sirloin, Inc. (NC)

Mom `n' Pop's Country Ham, LLC (NC)                               Naples Foods Inc. (FL)

Oak Ridge Foods, Inc. (TN)                                        Prime Sirloin, Inc. (TN)

Sagebrush, Inc. (NC)                                              Sagebrush of North Carolina, LLC (NC)

Sagebrush of Sevierville, Inc. (TN)                               Sagebrush of South Carolina, LLC (SC)

Sagebrush of Tennessee, LP (TN)                                   Spicewood, Inc. (DE)

Seven Stars, Inc. (MD)                                            South Carolina WSMP, Inc. (SC)

St. Augustine Foods, Inc. (FL)                                    Sunshine WSMP, Inc. (FL)

Tennessee WSMP, Inc. (TN)                                         Tumbleweed of Pigeon Forge, Inc. (TN)

Virginia WSMP, Inc. (VA)
</TABLE>

Omitted from the above list are two inactive subsidiaries which do not
constitute a significant subsidiary.
EX-10.5



 






Exhibit 10.5




AMENDMENT TO THE

NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN




          WHEREAS, National Fuel Gas Company (the “Company”) previously adopted the National
Fuel Gas Company Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of key employees
of the Company and its subsidiaries (the “Participants”); and




          WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 10 of the Plan, the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan
in whole or in part at any time, and desires to amend the Plan in order to provide for the
immediate distribution of any portion of a Participant’s Accumulation Account (as defined in the
Plan) balance that, as of December 31, 2004, was not “earned and vested” within the meaning of
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 409A”).




          NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:




          1. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan contrary, prior to
December 31, 2005, the Company shall distribute in full any portion of the balance of a
Participant’s accumulation Account that, as of December 31, 2004, was not “earned and vested”
within the meaning of Section 409A.




          2. In all other respects, the Plan shall remain unchanged.




          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by the signature of
its duly authorized officer as of this 21 day of October, 2005.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ A. M. Cellino	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	A. M. Cellino	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Secretary
exv10w1



 








Exhibit 10.1




NaviSite, Inc.




Summary Regarding Director Compensation




     All of the directors on the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of NaviSite, Inc. (the
“Company”) receive reimbursement of expenses incurred with respect to attendance at meetings of the
Board and meetings of committees thereof.



     The Board has adopted a Director Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) pursuant to which the
independent directors of the Board and the Chairman of the Board shall be compensated. The Plan
provides that each independent director and the Chairman of the Board shall be paid an annual fee
of $20,000. The Plan also provides that (i) the chairman of the Board’s Compensation Committee and
the chairman of the Board’s Audit Committee (collectively, the “Committee Chairs”) shall each
receive an additional annual fee of $5,000, (ii) each member of the Compensation Committee and the
Audit Committee (other than the Committee Chairs) shall receive an additional annual fee of $3,000,
and (iii) the Chairman of the Board shall receive an additional annual fee of $7,000. The annual
fees are payable in quarterly installments. The Plan also provides that upon initial election to
the Board, each independent director and the Chairman of the Board shall receive an initial stock
option grant (the “Initial Option”) to purchase an aggregate of 50,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock. The shares subject to the Initial Option shall vest monthly over a period of three
years. Upon re-election to the Board, each independent director and the Chairman of the Board shall
receive a stock option grant (the “Annual Option”) to purchase an aggregate of 15,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock. The Committee Chairs will not receive any additional stock options as a
result of their position as Committee Chairs. The exercise price per share of the Initial Option
and the Annual Option shall be equal to the closing price per share of the common stock as reported
on the Nasdaq National Market (or other market or exchange on which shares of NaviSite’s common
stock are listed or quoted for trading) on the date of grant. The shares subject to the Annual
Option shall vest monthly over a period of twelve months.
10564.

#### Mitchell *v.*The State.

Decided July 22, 1919.

Indictment for sale of liquor; from Bandolph superior court— Judge Worrill. March 31, 1919.

*Charles W. Worrill,*for plaintiff in error.

*B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold,t*contra.

Stephens, J.

1. In the absence of a timely written request therefor it was not error for the trial judge to fail to charge the law relative to the weight to be given to confessions of guilt.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
Capacity Building for 

Organizational Resilience: 

Standards-Based Curriculum on 

Risk, Disruption and Continuity 

Rochester Institute of Technology

Lisa Greenwood, PhD

Jennifer Schneider, ScD

Dawn Hess, PhD
Our Team

Lisa Greenwood 

Ph.D., ISSP-SA 

Jennifer Schneider 

Sc.D., CIH

Yewande Abraham 

PhD

Sam Samanta

PhD

Dawn Hess,

PhD
Project Goals

Curricular Goal: Develop and embed a set of reusable and 

customizable course modules on risk, disruption and continuity at 

levels appropriate for undergraduate and graduate students.

Faculty Goal: Support cross-disciplinary faculty expertise 

development in risk, disruption, and continuity and related 

standards, by sharing our processes for development and our 

content across two academic institutions, as well as externally

Educational Effectiveness Goal: Ensure the effectiveness of the 

course modules via a cohesive and proven educational structure

Dissemination Goal: Disseminate our results via published papers, 

conference presentations and a website
Project Approach

Figure 1: Key Standards in Risk, Disruption and Continuity Domains

Multi-Disciplinary, Standards-Based Learning Modules
Project Approach – Course Integration

Theme Relevance for 

Existing Courses

Themes in Risk, Disruption & Continuity Standards

Leadership & 

Strategy

Critical Operations/ 

Infrastructure

Business Impact 

Analysis

Risk Assessment & 

Reduction

Crisis 

Communications

Training, Testing 

and Tabletops

Supply Chain

Disaster/ 

Emergency 

Resources

RIT ESHS 720 EHS Management ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

RIT ESHS 740 EHS System Design ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

RIT TCOM 327 EHS Professional 

Communication

✔ ✔ ✔

RIT ESHS 460 Accident Causation and 

Prevention

✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

RIT CONM 650 Principles of Construction 

Leadership & Management

✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

FLCC TECH 116 Introduction to Careers in 

High-Tech Ecosystems 

✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

FLCC TECH 231 Smart Systems Technologies ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

FLCC TECH 234 Cyberphysical Automation II ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Project Deliverables and Outcomes

• Curricular Modules – multidisciplinary, standards-based

• RISK

• DISRUPTION

• CONTINUITY

• Modules include

• Curricular content in ~ 8 themes/elements

• Tools, guidance, and resources for faculty

• Sphere of influence:

• Students in CET

• Students in FLCC TECH 

• Students and faculty in other programs and institutions
Dissemination

• Internal

• Targeted courses in EHSM, CONM, ICT

• Shared with RIT programs in Colleges of Computing and 

Information Science, Engineering, Engineering Technology, 

and Business

• External

• Validation institutions – SUNY Brockport, Syracuse U.

• NIST final summary paper

• NIST workshops

• Academic or professional journals

• ANSI Standards Learn portal
Questions?

Contact: 

Lisa Greenwood

lisa.greenwood@rit.edu
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summarized financial information from the Mountain Fuel
Supply Company Statement of Income and Balance Sheet for the year ended December
31, 1996, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to audited financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,875
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     15,295
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,062
<PP&E>                                         825,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                 325,821
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 631,069
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          142,758
<BONDS>                                        175,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,828
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,974
<OTHER-SE>                                     193,268
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   631,069
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               371,928
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  279,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,380
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,434
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,446
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,988
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,988
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
A ppeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed Au gust 12 , 202 1.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 20

- 00 586

- CR

EX PARTE WILLIAM SOLOMON LEWIS

On Appeal from the 185 th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial C ourt Ca use No. 1678565

MEMORAN DUM OPIN IO N

Wil liam Solomon Lewis app ealed from an order denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he sought reduction of pretrial bond. On July 1, 2021, Lewis was convicted of reta liation and sentenced to confi nement for e ight

years in prison

. Our record has been supplemented with the judgment of that
conviction.
Issues regarding p retrial bail are moot when the accused is no longer subject to pretrial confinement. See Martinez v. State , 826 S.W.2d 620, 620 (Tex. Crim.2

App. 1992); Ben net v. St ate , 818 S.W.2d 199, 200 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, no pet.). Accordingly, we dis miss the appeal

.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise
, Bourliot , and Poissant.
Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
                         U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                           YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                                       -------------------------------
                                                                                         1998       1997       1996
                                                                                       ---------  ---------  ---------
<S>                                                                                    <C>        <C>        <C>
Income before taxes..................................................................  $   2,150  $   2,018  $   2,001
 
Interest expense (net of amounts capitalized)........................................        386        374        414
Interest factor on rentals ( 1/3)....................................................         56         67         54
                                                                                       ---------  ---------  ---------
Earnings available for fixed charges.................................................  $   2,592  $   2,459  $   2,469
                                                                                       ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                                       ---------  ---------  ---------
Interest expense.....................................................................  $     411  $     394  $     445
Interest factor on rentals ( 1/3)....................................................         56         67         54
                                                                                       ---------  ---------  ---------
Fixed charges........................................................................  $     467  $     461  $     499
                                                                                       ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                                       ---------  ---------  ---------
 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges...................................................       5.55       5.33       4.95
</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.14



Summary of Compensation Arrangements for Named Executive
Officers



The executive officers of the
Company serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. From time to time, the Organization & Compensation Committee of the Board reviews and
determines the salaries that are paid to the Company’s executive officers. Salaries are intended to be competitive and reflect factors such as
individual performance, level of responsibility, and prior experience. The following are the annual base salaries for fiscal 2006 for the
Company’s fiscal 2005 Chief Executive Officers and other four most highly compensated executive officers for fiscal 2005 (“Named Executive
Officers”), including Dale R. Olseth, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer.




	  Named Executive Officer
	
	
	   
	Base Salary  

	  Dale R. Olseth1
	    	    	    	  $	175,000	  
	  Bruce J Barclay2
	    	    	    	  $	325,000	  
	  Philip D. Ankeny
	    	    	    	  $	193,209	  
	  Steven J. Keough
	    	    	    	  $	207,504	  
	  David S. Wood
	    	    	    	  $	214,200	  
	  Lise W. Duran
	    	    	    	  $	139,920	  




 




In addition, the Named Executive
Officers are eligible to receive cash bonuses, stock options and other awards under the Company’s FY 2006 SurModics Bonus Plan and its 2003 Equity
Incentive Plan. The FY 2006 SurModics Bonus Plan and the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, including the form of options and awards under such Plan, are
exhibits to this Form 10-K. A description of certain former stock plans, other benefit plans generally available to all Company employees, including
the Named Executive Officers, and the compensation philosophy of the Organization & Compensation Committee are set forth in the Company’s
Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on December 15, 2004, which description is incorporated herein by reference.








1 Mr. Olseth retired as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective July 1, 2005. Mr. Olseth continues to serve as an employee
of the Company and remain on its Board of Directors as Executive Chairman



2 Mr. Barclay was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company efffective July 1, 2005.