alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4737 

To provide additional exemptions from the community service requirement 

for a resident of a public housing project. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2004 

Mr. MEEKS of New York (for himself, Mr. ISRAEL, Ms. LEE, Mr. TOWNS, 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, 

Mr. NADLER, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. OWENS, Mr. CROWLEY, Mrs. MALONEY, 

Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, and Mr. SERRANO) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To provide additional exemptions from the community service 

requirement for a resident of a public housing project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMMUNITY SERVICE REQUIREMENT. 

4 (a) COMMUNITY SERVICE REQUIREMENT.—Section 

5 12(c)(2) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 

6 U.S.C. 1437j(c)(2)) is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (A) by striking ‘‘62’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘60’’; 
2 

•HR 4737 IH 

1 (2) at the end of subparagraph (D) by striking 

2 ‘‘or’’; 

3 (3) at the end of subparagraph (E) by striking 

4 the period and inserting a semicolon; and 

5 (4) by adding after subparagraph (E) the fol6 lowing new subparagraphs: 

7 ‘‘(F) is in her third trimester of pregnancy; 

8 ‘‘(G) is a parent or guardian of a child 

9 under the age of 5 and resides with the child; 

10 ‘‘(H) has reported being the victim of do11 mestic violence (as such term is defined in sec12 tion 2003 of the Omnibus Crime Control and 

13 Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796gg– 

14 2)) to a local law enforcement agency on at 

15 least one occasion during the previous 12 

16 months and such agency has not found that the 

17 individual’s report is without merit; 

18 ‘‘(I) is unemployed and resides with a child 

19 under the age of 14 and the individual’s spouse, 

20 who is employed full-time; 

21 ‘‘(J) provides more than 20 hours per 

22 week of unpaid childcare to a child with respect 

23 to whom the individual is not a parent or 

24 guardian; or 
3 

•HR 4737 IH 

1 ‘‘(K) is eligible to receive food stamps pur2 suant to the Food Stamp Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 

3 2011 et seq.).’’. 

Æ
**Exhibit24**

 

 

United States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

 

 

| Re:    |                          | ALLTEL Corporation |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------------------|
|   | Commission File No. 1-4996    |
|   | 1934 Act Filings on Form 10-K |
|   | Authorized Representatives    |

 

Gentlemen:

 

The above Company is the issuer of securitiesregistered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (The“Act”).  Each of the persons signing hisname below confirms, as of the date appearing opposite his signature, that eachof the “Authorized Representatives” named below is authorized on his behalf tosign and submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission such filings on Form10-K as are required by the Act.  Eachperson so signing also confirms the authority of each of the Authorized Representativesto do and perform on his behalf, any and all acts and things requisite ornecessary to assure compliance by the signing person with the Form 10-Krequirements.  The authority confirmedherein shall remain in effect as to each person signing his name below untilsuch time as the Commission shall receive from such person a writtencommunication terminating or modifying the authority.  Each person signing his name below expressly revokes allauthority heretofore given or executed by him with respect to such filingsunder the Act.

 

 

 

AuthorizedRepresentatives

 

Scott T. Ford

Francis X. Frantz

Jeffery R. Gardner

 

 

 
|   |                 |   | Date     |
|--------|----------------------|--------|----------|
|   |                 |   |     |
|   | /s/ Sharilyn Gasaway |   | 03/07/03 |

 

----
10457.

#### Tatum *v.*Padrosa.

Decided October 10, 1919.

Eviction; from Glynn superior court—Judge Highsmith. February 22, 1919.

*E. H. Williams,*for plaintiff in error.

*Max Isaac,*contra.

Luke, J.

1. A contract creating the relation of landlord and tenant for a time longer than one year by parol agreement has the effect of creating only a tenancy at will. Civil Code (1910), § 3693. In order to terminate a tenancy at will it is necessary that the landlord give to the tenant two months notice. Civil Code (1910), § 3709. A purchaser of realty from a landlord during the term of a tenant at will is entitled, upon notice as prescribed by law, to terminate the tenancy, and thereafter to dispossess the tenant. See *Willis*v. *Harrell,*118 *Ga.*906 (45 S. E. 794).

2. Where it is shown that a paper which would afford evidence material to the issue is in court, in the possession of a witness, it is the duty of the judge to require its production instanter, unless it appear that the evidence sought is privileged. In this case the alleged error of the judge in directing that certain papers be produced was cured; for the record shows that when the judge directed the production of the papers, counsel for the defendant, who had objected to their production, waived the objection, by stating in open court: “I have no objection to showing them [referring to the papers]. We have no secrets.” See *Rylee*v. *Bank of Statham,*7 *Ga. App.*489 (67 S. E. 383).

3. Upon the issue made by the filing of a counter-affidavit to a summary proceeding to evict a tenant, the only question to be determined is tenancy or no tenancy, and no question as to the landlord’s title is involved. See *Patrick*v. *Cobb,*122 *Ga.*80 (49 S. E. 806).

4. The court did not err in refusing to permit the plaintiff to reopen the case after both sides had closed and arguments had been made by both parties. Especially was it not harmful to the defendant, the party excepting to the refusal.

5. The charge of the court fully and fairly submitted the issue; the evidence authorized the verdict; and for no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED Pursuant to
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned,  Anthony J. Miceli, Chief Financial
Officer of United Capital Corp.,  (the  "Company"),  does hereby  certify,  with
respect to the Annual  Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the period ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Report") that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                          By: /s/ Anthony J. Miceli
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Anthony J. Miceli
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             April 27, 2004
```
**EXHIBIT 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Glenn M. Dobbs, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K of Mines Management, Inc.; and

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: April 28, 2016

 
|   | /s/ Glenn M. Dobbs          |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | Glenn M. Dobbs              |
|   | *Chief   Executive Officer* |

 

----
Government Publishing Office (GPO) Fiscal Year 2020 Agency Report

1. Please provide a summary of your agency’s activities undertaken to carry out the provisions of 

OMB Circular A-119, “Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary 

Consensus Standards and in Conformity Assessment Activities” and the National Technology 

Transfer and Advance Act (NTTAA). The summary should contain a link to the agency’s 

standards-specific website(s) where information about your agency’s standards and 

conformity assessment related activities are available.

The use of standards at GPO has ensured consistency in our manufacturing process and the 

ability to maintain the highest quality in the production of our documents. The use of standards 

is very important in our procurement / acquisition process and defining our needs. When 

dealing with vendors, standards provide a level playing field for them when bidding on our 

Agency requirements. We use VCSs by reference to inform potential bidders and offerors of our 

minimum requirements.

We also use standards to ensure consistency, and accuracy in the services that we provide to 

our customers.

To formulate compliance policies and procedures that govern air quality, waste management, 

wastewater discharge, pollution prevention, health and safety, GPO relies on VCSs and 

applicable Federal and District regulations.

Standards-based cataloging rules and procedures ensure consistent record creation, search, 

retrieval, and transfer of records in catalogs across libraries internationally (e.g., NISO Z39.50).

Standards referenced on GPO's web-pages:

CS https://gpo.gov/pdfs/vendors/sfas/ppr.pdf

CS https://www.gpo.gov/pdfs/vendors/sfas/qatap.pdf

CS https://www.gpo.gov/pdfs/vendors/sfas/terms.pdf

CS https://www.gpo.gov/vendors/microforms.htm

CS https://www.gpo.gov/pdfs/customers/sfas/ jcpregs.pdf

CS http://www.gpo.gov/pdfs/vendors/sfas/071jcp.pdf

CS https://www.gpo.gov/pdfs/vendors/sfas/O-90film.pdf

CS https://www.gpo.gov/pdfs/vendors/sfas/O-91paper.pdf

CS http://www.gpo.gov/pdfs/customers/sfas/vol12/vol_12.pdf

CS https://www.gpo.gov/pdfs/customers/Guidelines_Attending_PressSheetInspections.pdf

CS https://www.gpo.gov/pdfs/vendors/sfas/contractors_holding_psi.pdf

LSCM/PST https://www.fdlp.gov/cataloging-guidelines

FIN http://www.main.gpo.gov/FA/Accounting_Policies_Manual_Q1_FY2019.pdf

PST http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/

PST http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/

PST https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/

2. Please list the government-unique standards (GUS) your agency began using in lieu of 

voluntary consensus standards during FY 2020. Please note that GUS which are still in effect 
from previous years should continue to be listed, thus the total number in your agency's 

report will include all GUS currently in use (previous years and new as of this FY): 0
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JORGE C. GARRIDO
, Appellant,

v.

PATRICIA A. GARRIDO n/k/a PATRICIA MARTINEZ
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2140

[ June 6, 20108 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Alfred J. Horowitz , Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE 07

- 08800

.

Troy William Klein, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

G ERBER
, C.J

.

The former husband appeals from the circuit court’s final judgment upon the former wi fe’s motion for attorney’s fees

. The former husband raises multiple grounds, only one of which has merit. We agree with the

former husband that the circuit court erred when it failed to calculate the “lodestar” for the attorney’s fees award. As we state d in Nagl v. Navarro

, 187 So. 3d 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016):

An award of attorney’ s fees must be supported by substantial competent evidence and contain express findings regarding the number of hours reasonably expended and a reasonable hourly rate for the type of litigation involved. The lodestar method is an appropriate starting poi nt in domestic

relations cases

. In using the lodestar method, the trial court should first determine the number of hours reasonably expended on the litigation, and then determine the reasonable hourly rate for the services. Fla. Patient’ s Comp. Fund v.
Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145, 1150 (Fla. 1985).2 As the reviewing court, we should be able to discern f rom the face of the trial court’ s orders whether the trial court made

such determinations. Where there is nothing in the trial

court’ s order that allows the appellate court to discern

whether .

. . the Rowe factors were considered in de termining a reasonable attorney’ s fee, a fee award simply taking the amount charged by the attorney and determining it to be reasonable is improper

. . . .

Id. at 361 ( other internal citations, quotation marks, a nd brackets omitted).

Based on the foregoing, we reverse the final judgment and remand for

the circuit court to make the appropriate findings as to the reasonableness of the hours expended and the hourly rate. On the other grounds which

the former husban d raises, we affirm without further discussion.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded

.

G ROSS and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1

    Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                   CERTIFICATE OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

     This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section
1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal  Procedures) of
the  United  States  Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other
purpose.

     The  undersigned,   who  are  the  Co-Chief   Executive   Officers  of  Cox
Technologies, Inc. ("Company") hereby certifies as follows:

     The Annual Report of Form 10-K of the Company ("Report"), which accompanies
this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and all  information  contained in the
Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Date:  8-17-04      /s/ Brian D. Fletcher             /s/ Kurt C. Reid
       -------      --------------------------        --------------------------
                    Brian D. Fletcher                 Kurt C. Reid
                    Co-Chief Executive Officer        Co-Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit        32(b)**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4492 

To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 

to extend the authorization for certain national heritage areas, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 2, 2004 

Mr. REGULA (for himself, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. BURNS, Mr. WILSON of 

South Carolina, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. GORDON, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. 

WAMP, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. TIERNEY, Ms. HART, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. SPRATT, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. 

BARRETT of South Carolina, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. DEMINT, 

Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. CLYBURN, Mr. SWEENEY, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. 

BROWN of South Carolina, Mr. MURTHA, and Mr. NEY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to extend the authorization for certain 

national heritage areas, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION AND APPROPRIATION EXTEN4 SIONS. 

5 The Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management 

6 Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–333) is amended— 
2 

•HR 4492 IH 

1 (1) in the items in the table of contents relating 

2 to title VIII of Division II, by striking ‘‘Canal Na3 tional Heritage Corridor’’ each place it appears and 

4 inserting ‘‘National Heritage Canalway’’; and 

5 (2) in Division II— 

6 (A) in each of sections 107, 208, 310, 408, 

7 507, 607, 707, 811, 910, by striking ‘‘Sep8 tember 30, 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 

9 2027’’; 

10 (B) in each of sections 108(a), 209(a), 

11 311(a), 409(a), 508(a), 608(a), 708(a), 812(a), 

12 by striking ‘‘a total of $10,000,000’’ and insert13 ing ‘‘a total of $20,000,000’’; 

14 (C) in section 909(c), by striking ‘‘not 

15 more than $10,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘not 

16 more than $20,000,000’’; and 

17 (D) in title VIII, by striking ‘‘Canal Na18 tional Heritage Corridor’’ each place it appears 

19 and inserting ‘‘National Heritage Canalway’’. 

Æ
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated March 26, 2007,  accompanying  the  consolidated
financial  statements  and  schedules  included  in the Annual  Report of United
Capital  Corp.  and  Subsidiaries  on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31,
2006. We hereby consent to the  incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration  Statements of United Capital Corp. on Form S-8 (Registration  Nos.
33-28045, 33-65140, 333-28395, 333-57873 and 333-98645).

/s/ Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP
-----------------------------------------
GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP

New York, New York
March 26, 2007
```
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
of U S WEST Communications, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 33-62845) of our report
dated February 12, 1996, on our audit of the consolidated financial statements
and consolidated financial statement schedule of U S WEST Communications, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 1995, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
 
/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 
Denver, Colorado
March 25, 1998
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our reports dated February 6, 1998 on the consolidated financial
statements and related financial statement schedule of U S WEST Communications,
Inc., as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for the years then ended included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K, into U S WEST Communications, Inc.'s previously
filed Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-62845).
 
/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
 
Denver, Colorado,
March 25, 1998.
EX-10.2



 






Exhibit 10.2




Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd.

2006 Annual Bonus Plan




Purpose



The purpose of this Plan is to increase the intrinsic business value of Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd.
and its operating subsidiaries (the “Company”) by aligning employee performance with the interests
of the Company’s owners. All full-time employees of the Company shall be eligible to participate in
the Plan.




Performance Targets



The Plan shall be tied to a calendar year performance cycle consistent with the Company’s fiscal
year. Annual bonus pool targets for categories of employees and an overall Company performance
target under the Plan shall be set by the Company’s Compensation and Nominating Committee (the
“Committee”). At the conclusion of the calendar year, the Committee shall judge Company performance
against the bonus pool targets when determining the final size of the bonus pools and the level of
payout for each employee. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer, in consultation with the
Committee, shall then recommend the distribution of the pool to individual Plan participants who
are non-executive officers of the Company. The Committee shall approve any payments to the
Company’s executive officers.




Bonus Pool Targets



For the 2006 calendar year, the annual bonus pool targets for the Company’s officers and all
remaining Company staff shall be the following percentages of eligible salaries:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Performance	 	Group A	 	Group B	 	Group C
	Minimum
	 	50%
	 	37.5%
	 	12.5%
	On Target
	 	100%
	 	75%
	 	25%
	Superior
	 	200%
	 	150%
	 	50%





Eligible salaries for all officers and staff shall be equivalent to the 2006 base salaries of Plan
participants, pro-rated in the case of any officer or staff member employed by the Company for less
than the entire 2006 calendar year.
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

|  | /s/                C.J. Duvall,                Jr.                                   |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | C.J.                DUVALL, JR. |
|--------|---------------------------------|
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   
         We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in
the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-50853) and related Prospectus of
Source Media, Inc. for the registration of 7,102,357 shares of its common stock
and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated February 13,
1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Source Media,
Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1997, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
    



                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Dallas, Texas
   
July 28, 1998
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00309-CV

Carole SMOYER-DIETRICH,

Appellant

v.

Howard R. DIETRICH,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-CI-16596

Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 13, 2011

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The appellee was served with a copy 

of appellant’s motion; the appellee has not filed a response. Therefore, we grant the motion and 

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of this appeal are taxed against the 

appellant. See id. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM