alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                         U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN MILLIONS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                      ----------------------------------------------------
                                                        1999       1998       1997       1996       1995
                                                      --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                                   <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Income before taxes.................................   $2,520     $2,150     $2,018     $2,001     $1,917
Interest expense (net of amounts capitalized).......      403        386        374        414        386
Interest factor on rentals ( 1/3)...................       78         56         67         54         60
                                                       ------     ------     ------     ------     ------
Earnings available for fixed charges................   $3,001     $2,592     $2,459     $2,469     $2,363
                                                       ======     ======     ======     ======     ======
Interest expense....................................   $  430     $  411     $  394     $  445     $  426
Interest factor on rentals ( 1/3)...................       78         56         67         54         60
                                                       ------     ------     ------     ------     ------
Fixed charges.......................................   $  508     $  467     $  461     $  499     $  486
                                                       ======     ======     ======     ======     ======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges..................     5.91       5.55       5.33       4.95       4.86
                                                       ======     ======     ======     ======     ======
</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.52
                                                                         Summary

Summary of Guaranty Contract of Comprehensive  Credit Facilities  entered by and
between BAK International,  Ltd. ("BAK HK") and Construction Bank dated December
1, 2005.

Summary of the main articles
>>    Contract number: bao2005zong1145042R-2
>>    As guarantor, BAK HK is willing to provide unconditional guaranty of joint
      and several  liability for the  indebtedness of the Company.  (hereinafter
      referred  to as  "Obligor")  under  the  Comprehensive  Credit  Facilities
      Agreement (Ref. Jie 2005 Zong 1145042R)  entered into by Constraction bank
      and the Obligor, and maximum amount secured is RMB100 million.
>>    The guaranty  covers:  all principals und master  agreement,  all interest
      (including  penalty  interest  and  compound  interest)  under the  master
      agreement  and the  appendixes  and the breach of  contract  compensation,
      damages and expenses incurred in realizing the creditor's right.
>>    Guaranty period:  The period of guaranty shall be determined in accordance
      with each financing under the master agreement. The period of guaranty for
      each financing  shall be the start date of each financing under the master
      agreement and its supplementary  agreement to the end of 2 years after the
      expiry of the  performance  period of the debt. In case that the extension
      agreement for the debt is agreed by the Obligor and Construction bank, the
      period of guaranty shall end at the end of 2 years after the expiry of the
      extended performance period of the debt.

Summary of the articles omitted:
>>    Creditor's Right to be Secured
>>    Liability
>>    Signature and Amendment of the Master Agreement
>>    Independency
>>    Undertakings
>>    Performance of Obligation of Guaranty Before Expiry
>>    Transfer of Amount Payable
>>    Miscellaneous
>>    Applicable Law and Dispute Settlement
>>    Effectiveness
>>    Statement
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 28433) published on page 71785 of the issue for Wednesday, December 3, 2014.

                    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis heading, the entry for                     *Bryon B. Webb, III,*                     Emden, Missouri, as trustee of the Byron B. Webb, III Separate Property Revocable Trust, dated April 26, 2004, and Victoria Webb Sack, Del Mar, California, as trustee of the Victoria Webb Sack Separate Property Revocable Trust, dated June 12, 2008, is revised to read as follows:                

A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Yvonne Sparks, Community Development Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:

                    1.                     *Bryon B. Webb, III, Emden, Missouri, as trustee of the Byron B. Webb, III Separate Property Revocable Trust, dated April 26, 2004, and Victoria Webb Sack, Del Mar, California, as trustee of the Victoria Webb Sack Separate Property Revocable Trust, dated June 12, 2008, individually and as members of a family control group;*                     to retain and acquire additional voting shares of Byron B. Webb, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain and acquire additional voting shares of Homebank, both in Palmyra, Missouri.                

Comments on this application must be received by December 15, 2014.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 8, 2014.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-29043 Filed 12-10-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 16, 2021

No. 04-21-00296-CR

Vincent Trevino GOMEZ Jr.,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR12346

The Honorable Jennifer Pena, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due November 15, 2021. On November 15, 2021, 

appellant filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file the brief until January 14, 2022, 

for a total extension of sixty days. After consideration, we GRANT the motion and ORDER

appellant to file his/her brief by January 14, 2022.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of November, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
exv10w48



 






Exhibit 10.48




Vesting Acceleration of Certain Stock Options



On August 4, 2005, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of
Applied Materials, Inc. (“Applied”) approved the vesting acceleration of certain unvested,
out-of-the-money stock options outstanding under Applied’s employee stock option plans effective
August 5, 2005. Stock options held by Applied’s most senior executive officers, namely James C.
Morgan, Michael R. Splinter, Nancy H. Handel, Franz Janker and David N.K.Wang; non-employee
directors; and consultants were not included in the vesting acceleration. Vesting was accelerated
for stock options that had exercise prices greater than $17.85 per share, which was the closing
price of Applied common stock on August 5, 2005.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 479

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize Army arsenals to undertake to fulfill orders or contracts for articles or services in advance 

of the receipt of payment under certain circumstances. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2003

Mr. MCNULTY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize Army 

arsenals to undertake to fulfill orders or contracts for 

articles or services in advance of the receipt of payment 

under certain circumstances.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERFORMANCE OF ORDERS FOR ARTICLES OR 

4 SERVICES BY ARMY ARSENALS BEFORE RE5 CEIPT OF PAYMENT. 

6 (a) AUTHORITY.—(1) Chapter 433 of title 10, United 

7 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 4541 

8 the following new section: 
2

•HR 479 IH 

1 ‘‘§ 4541a. Army arsenals: performance before receipt 

2 of payment 

3 ‘‘(a) AUTHORITY.—Regulations under section 

4 2208(h) of this title shall authorize the Army arsenals to 

5 undertake, with working-capital funds, to fulfill orders or 

6 contracts of customers referred to in subsection (b) for 

7 articles or services in advance of the receipt of payment 

8 for the articles or services. 

9 ‘‘(b) TRANSACTIONS TO WHICH APPLICABLE.—The 

10 authority provided in subsection (a) applies with respect 

11 to an order or contract for articles or services that is 

12 placed or entered into, respectively, with an arsenal by a 

13 customer that—

14 ‘‘(1) is—

15 ‘‘(A) a department or agency of the United 

16 States; 

17 ‘‘(B) a person using the articles or services 

18 in fulfillment of a contract of a department or 

19 agency of the United States; or 

20 ‘‘(C) a person supplying the articles or 

21 services to a foreign government under sections 

22 22, 23, and 24 of the Arms Export Control Act 

23 (22 U.S.C. 2762, 2763, 2764); and 

24 ‘‘(2) is eligible under any other provision of law 

25 to obtain the articles or services from the arsenal.’’. 
3

•HR 479 IH 

1 (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such 

2 chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating 

3 to section 4541 the following new item:

‘‘4541a. Army arsenals: performance before receipt of payment.’’.

4 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

5 prescribe the regulations to carry out section 4541a of 

6 title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), 

7 not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment 

8 of this Act.

Æ
#### William F. Brion v. James M. Kennedy.

*Consideration for security for costs*— Intwestfrom *beginning of suit.*

¡Security for costs is based on sufficient consideration to sustain it as a common-law obligation wbicb will support an action whether the security was or was not given in the statutory'mode.

Interest upon an obligation may run from the beginning of suit if the date of a previous demand for payment is not shown.

Case made from Kent.

Submitted January 11.

Decided January 18.

Assumpsit, begun before a justice, on an undertaking by Kennedy to become surety for costs in behalf of Asa Finch in a suit brought by Finch against Brion. Plaintiff recovered before the justice, but on appeal judgment was given for defendant.

[Reversed.

*Frank L. Oa/rf enter*for plaintiff.

*Sliter & Rogers*for defendant.

Graves, O. J.

Whether the security for costs sued on ■was given in the mode described in the statute would be important if the question concerned the right to enter judgment on it on motion. But being sued as a common-law •obligation the point relied on is immaterial. There can be no doubt of its validity as a common-law undertaking. The •consideration was sufficient. It was made to enable the plaintiff in that case to go on against the present plaintiff •and it effected the purpose, and the liability was assumed on request and understandingly. The facts found are conclusive •of the right of action and the court erred in ruling to the ■contrary. The judgment must be reversed and one entered here in favor of the plaintiff for $93.98, the amount of the costs covered by the undertaking, with interest from March •8, 1881, at which time this suit was commenced; it appear*500ing that payment was previously demanded but the date of the demand not being shown.

The plaintiff will recover his costs of both courts.

The other Justices concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4696 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4696

To promote the use of anaerobic digesters by agricultural producers and 
    rural small businesses to produce renewable energy and improve 
                         environmental quality.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2004

  Mr. McHugh introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To promote the use of anaerobic digesters by agricultural producers and 
    rural small businesses to produce renewable energy and improve 
                         environmental quality.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTERS TO PRODUCE RENEWABLE ENERGY.

    Section 9006(a) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 
2002 (7 U.S.C. 8106(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) promote the use of anaerobic digesters to produce 
        renewable energy.''.

SEC. 2. USE OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTERS TO IMPROVE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.

    Section 1240A(6)(A) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 
3839aa-1) is amended by inserting ``(including an anaerobic digester)'' 
after ``site-specific animal waste management facility''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 18




December 29, 2000

ALLTEL Corporation

Re: Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2000.

Gentlemen/Ladies:

This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a
letter from a registrant's independent accountants whenever there has been a
change in accounting principle or practice.

In the fourth quarter of 2000, the Company changed its method of amortizing
unrecognized actuarial gains and losses in computing its annual pension cost.
The change resulted in any unrecognized actuarial gains and losses that exceed
17.5% of the greater of a) the projected benefit obligation or b) the market
value of plan assets being amortized over 5 years using a straight-line basis.
Unrecognized actuarial gains and losses below the 17.5% corridor will continue
to be amortized over the average remaining service life of active employees.
Under the previous method, all unrecognized actuarial gains and losses were
amortized over the average remaining service life of active employees. Company
management believes this accelerated amortization method is preferable as it
will result in more timely recognition of significant actuarial gains and losses
in computing the Company's annual pension cost.

A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining
the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable alternative
principles has not been established by the accounting profession. Thus, we
cannot make an objective determination of whether the change in accounting
described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method. However, we have
reviewed the pertinent factors, including those related to financial reporting,
in this particular case on a subjective basis, and our opinion stated below is
based on our determination made in this manner.

We are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of accounting is to an
acceptable alternative method of accounting, which, based upon the reasons
stated for the change and our discussions with you, is also preferable under the
circumstances in this particular case. In arriving at this opinion, we have
relied on the business judgment and business planning of your management.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DANIEL LEWIS BENNETT, :

Petitioner, : CA 09-0827-CG-C

vs. : 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : CR 07-0237-CG

Respondent. 

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed

relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the

recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)

and dated January 20, 2010, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED this 18th day of February, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cr-00237-CG-C Document 46 Filed 02/18/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Gary L. Dreher, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AMDL, Inc. for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the small business issuer and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s firstfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: November 19, 2007   /s/ Gary L. Dreher   Gary L. Dreher  Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 21




                   EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT




            SUBSIDIARY                                 STATE OF INCORPORATION

Morgan's Creative Restaurant Concepts, Inc.                     Ohio
Morgan's Restaurants of Ohio, Inc.                              Ohio
Morgan's Restaurants of Pennsylvania, Inc.                 Pennsylvania
Morgan's Restaurants of West Virginia, Inc.                West Virginia
      (aka Morgan's Weirton Foods, Inc.)
Morgan's Restaurants of New Jersey, Inc.                     New Jersey
Morgan's Foods of Missouri, Inc.                              Missouri
Morgan's Restaurants of New York, Inc.                        New York
Morgan's Tacos of Pennsylvania, Inc.                       Pennsylvania
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     Exhibit 5.1

                               PALMER & DODGE LLP
                                ONE BEACON STREET
                           BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108

Telephone: (617) 573-0100                              Facsimile: (617) 227-4420

                                October 22, 1998


Lamar Advertising Company
5551 Corporate Boulevard
Baton Rouge, Louisiana  70808

         We are rendering this opinion in connection with the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (the "Registration Statement") filed by Lamar Advertising
Company (the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on or about the date hereof. The
Registration Statement relates to the registration of 63,005 shares (the "Class
A Shares") of the Company's Class A Common Stock, $0.001 par value, offered for
sale by certain stockholders of the Company listed therein.

         We have acted as your counsel in connection with the preparation of the
Registration Statement and are familiar with the proceedings taken by the
Company in connection with the authorization and issuance of such Class A
Shares. We have examined all such documents as we consider necessary to enable
us to render this opinion.

         Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the Class A Shares
have been duly authorized and validly issued and are fully paid and
nonassessable.

         We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to the reference to our firm under "Legal Matters."

                                                     Very truly yours,



                                                     /s/ Palmer & Dodge LLP