alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IMPROVED SEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2019-1961

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in No. 1:16-cv-00650-JFB-SRF, Senior 

Judge Joseph F. Bataillon.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

ROBERT YORIO, Carr & Ferrell LLP, Menlo Park, CA,

argued for plaintiff-appellant. 

 CONSTANTINE L. TRELA, JR., Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented 

by RICHARD ALAN CEDEROTH; SCOTT BORDER, JOSEPH A.

MICALLEF, Washington, DC. 

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

Case: 19-1961 Document: 54 Page: 1 Filed: 07/13/2020
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, REYNA and 

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

July 13, 2020 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 19-1961 Document: 54 Page: 2 Filed: 07/13/2020
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

A reconciliation of basic to diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended
September 30, 1998 and 1997, is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        1998               1998               1997               1997
                                                       Basic             Diluted             Basic             Diluted
                                                    ------------       ------------       ------------       ------------
<S>                                                 <C>                <C>                <C>                <C>          
     Net earnings (loss)                            $    (63,625)      $    (63,625)      $   (162,839)      $   (162,839)
                                                    ============       ============       ============       ============
     Weighted average number of
           common shares outstanding
           during the period                          17,024,525         17,024,525         17,016,833         17,016,833
     
     Net effect of dilutive stock options
           based on the treasury stock
           method at market prices                            --                 --                 --                 -- 
                                                    ------------       ------------       ------------       ------------
     Shares used for computation                      17,024,525         17,024,525         17,016,833         17,016,833
                                                    ============       ============       ============       ============
     Net earnings (loss) per share                   $      (0.00)      $      (0.00)      $      (0.01)      $      (0.01)
                                                    ============       ============       ============       ============
</TABLE>


As the Company incurred a net loss for the three months ended September 30,
1998 and 1997, there were no adjustments for potentially dilutive securities as
the adjustments would have been antidilutive.
#### John Mullins *v.*Commonwealth.

Witnesses — Impeachment.

.A witness cannot be impeached by testimony of other witnesses as to specific crimes or offenses supposed to have been committed by' him.

Homicide — Instructions—Reversal.

On appeal from a conviction for manslaughter the case will not be reversed for error in instructions as to murder» when it could not have prejudiced the accused.

APPEAL FROM ADAIR CIRCUIT COURT.

June 21, 1873.

Opinión by

Judge Lindsay;

The credibility of the witness Hill could not be impeached by asking other witnesses as to specific crimes or offenses supposed to have been committed by him. Besides this it does not appear from the bill of exceptions what the witnesses interrogated on this subject would have stated had they been permitted to answer. Appellant was convicted of manslaughter. It is not necessary therefore that the instructions relating to the crime of murder shall be critically examined. It is complained that the terms “murder,” “malice,” and “aforethought”'are not correctly defined.

There is certainly nothing in the instructions given calculated to induce the jury in finding the accused guilty of manslaughter to fix his punishment at a longer time in the state prison than they would have done had he been tried under an indictment for the latter offense.

This court has reversed convictions for manslaughter, when the defendant was tried under an indictment for *murder*and the court, in instructing as to the law of murder, erred in such manner as to mislead the jury as to the cruelty or heinousness of the offense actually committed. .If it be conceded that the court erred in this case as to the law of murder, a question we do not decide, these errors were not calculated to mislead the jury as to' the wickedness or cruelty of the offense committed and were not prejudicial to the accused.

Instruction No. 9, given for appellant, correctly states the law of *27manslaughter. Appellant can not complain of the refusal of the court to give Instruction No. 8. He was not convicted of murder and the doctrine therein stated was substantially embodied in Instructions Nos. 7 and 8, given for the commonwealth.

*Garnett, for appellant.*

*-, for appellee.*

Perceiving no available error in the action of the circuit court, the judgment must be *affirmed.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA *

*

vs. * CRIM. NO. 07- 00349-CG

*

ARACELY LOPEZ, *

*

Defendant *

FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE

WHEREAS, on January 12, 2009, by Special Verdict pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4)

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the trial jury determined that the defendant obtained

$6,000,000.00 in proceeds from the offense in Count One as set forth in Count Twenty-Four of

the Superseding Indictment, for which the defendant has been convicted, and

WHEREAS, the United States filed a Motion for a Final Order of Forfeiture which would

consist of a personal money judgment against the defendant in the amount of $6,000,000.00, and

WHEREAS, Rule 32.2(c)(1) provides that “no ancillary proceeding is required to the

extent that the forfeiture consists of a money judgment.”

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that

the defendant shall forfeit to the United States the sum of $6,000,000.00 pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §

853.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States District Court shall retain jurisdiction

in the case for the purpose of enforcing this Order; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3), this order of forfeiture

shall become final as to the defendant at the time of sentencing and shall be made part of the

sentence and included in the judgment; and

Case 1:07-cr-00349-CG-N Document 110 Filed 02/11/09 Page 1 of 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States may, at any time, move pursuant to

Rule 32.2(e) to amend this order of forfeiture to substitute property having a value not to exceed

$6,000,000.00 to satisfy the money judgment in whole or in part; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall forward three certified

copies of this order to Assistant United States Attorney Gloria A. Bedwell.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cr-00349-CG-N Document 110 Filed 02/11/09 Page 2 of 2
No. D-698.

#### In re Disbarment of McCoy.

It is ordered that Joseph R. McCoy, III, of Seaford, N. Y., be suspended from •the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Exhibit 24


United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.  20549



                                            Re:  ALLTEL Corporation
                                                 Commission File No. 1-4996
                                                 1934 Act Filings on Form 10-K
                                                 Authorized Representatives

Gentlemen:

    The above Company is the issuer of securities registered under Section 12
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (The "Act"). Each of the persons
signing his name below confirms, as of the date appearing opposite his
signature, that each of the "Authorized Representatives" named below is
authorized on his behalf to sign and submit to the Securities and Exchange
Commission such filings on Form 10-K as are required by the Act. Each person so
signing also confirms the authority of each of the Authorized Representatives to
do and perform on his behalf, any and all acts and things requisite or necessary
to assure compliance by the signing person with the Form 10-K requirements. The
authority confirmed herein shall remain in effect as to each person signing his
name below until such time as the Commission shall receive from such person a
written communication terminating or modifying the authority. Each person
signing his name below expressly revokes all authority heretofore given or
executed by him with respect to such filings under the Act.



                           Authorized Representatives

                                  Scott T. Ford
                                Francis X. Frantz
                               Jeffery R. Gardner



                                                               Date

                         /s/ David A. Gatewood                 03/01/00
                         ----------------------------------------------------




                                       84
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FORM 10-
KSB
FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12 MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                          84
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   188
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     160
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                433
<PP&E>                          194
<DEPRECIATION>                  36
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           81
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        309
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     750
<OTHER-SE>                      918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    629
<SALES>                         841
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                841
<CGS>                           848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                375
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (454)
<INCOME-TAX>                     639
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (455)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                   (455)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                  (.14)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4508 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4508

 To amend the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 to require the 
 Secretary to permit continued use and occupancy of certain privately 
 owned cabins in the Mineral King Valley in the Sequoia National Park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 3, 2004

  Mr. Nunes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 to require the 
 Secretary to permit continued use and occupancy of certain privately 
 owned cabins in the Mineral King Valley in the Sequoia National Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF CABINS IN THE MINERAL KING VALLEY.

     Section 314 of the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 
(Public Law 95-625; 92 Stat. 3480) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ``Such rights of use 
        and occupancy shall be for not more than twenty-five years or 
        for a term ending at the death of the owner or his or her 
        spouse, whichever is later.''; and
            (2) in subsection (d)(2)(B), by inserting ``and to their 
        heirs, successors, and assigns'' after ``those persons who were 
        lessees or permittees of record on the date of enactment of 
        this Act''.
                                 <all>
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-3111

_____________________________

FLORIDIANS FOR ECONOMIC 

ADVANCEMENT,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA ELECTIONS 

COMMISSION,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from Florida Elections Commission.

Nicholas Primrose, Chairman.

November 28, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, BILBREY, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Nicholas D. Fugate, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Stephanie Cunningham, General Counsel, and Mattie Theresa 

Clay, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS






We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-46699),
Form S-3 (No. 333-48555) and Form S-3 (No. 333-52879) of American Industrial
Properties REIT of our report dated August 31, 1998 relating to the statement of
revenue and certain expenses of The Norfolk Commerce Park Properties which
appear in the Current Report on Form 8-K of American Industrial Properties REIT
dated July 30, 1998.




/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
October 23, 1998
exv10wpw2



 




EXHIBIT 10-p-2



     
Schedule identifying agreements substantially identical
to the form of Indemnity Agreement constituting
Exhibit 10-p-1 hereto entered into by Conexant Systems,
Inc. and each of the following persons




   Name   




Donald R. Beall




Steven J. Bilodeau




Dipanjan Deb




Dwight W. Decker




F. Craig Farrill




Armando Geday




Balakrishnan S. Iyer




John W. Marren




D. Scott Mercer




Jerre L. Stead




Giuseppe Zocco




J. Scott Blouin




Jasmina T. Boulanger




Lewis C. Brewster




Dennis E. O’Reilly




Kerry K. Petry




F. Matthew Rhodes




Michael J. Rispoli



101
#### Fite *v.*Whittemore.

No. 6563.

February 19, 1929.

Atkinson, J.

The amendment in aid of the levy involved in this ease was in substance a complaint at law seeking a personal judgment for breach of warranty. Being of this character, the bill of exceptions assigning error on the judgment dismissing the action presents a case of which the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction, and the writ of error is not within the jurisdiction of this court.

*Transferred to Court of Appeals.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*902
      *Y. Ar Henderson*and *J. M. Lang,*for plaintiff.

*J. G. B„ Hnoin*and *F. A.*Cantrell, for defendant
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, M. G. Duncan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Milastar Corporation and Subsidiaries;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: July 29, 2005/s/ M. G. DUNCANM. G. DuncanChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
This  schedule contains  summary financial  information extracted  from the
Consolidated  Balance  Sheets  for Mines  Management,  Inc. at December 31,
1999 and the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
for the year ended  December 31, 1999 and  is qualified in its  entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          20,090
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      376
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,933
<PP&E>                                          65,852
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 403,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,312
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,970
<OTHER-SE>                                     327,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   403,764
<SALES>                                          4,622
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,622
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  147,565
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (116,571)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        55
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (116,626)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (116,626)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.024)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.024)








</TABLE>
| 1)   | the              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)              of              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | the              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the              Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                  |                                                 |                                            |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |                                                 |
|                             |                                            |                                       |
| Date: June              28, 2006 | By:                                        | /s/WILLIAM              P.              SPENCER |
|                                  | William                P. Spencer                    |
|                                  | Chief                Executive Officer and President |

----