alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350



In connection with the filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission of BBJ Environmental Technologies,
Inc.s (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the Report), I, Robert G. Baker, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify in my capacity as an
officer of the Company, that:



(1) the Report fully complies
with the requirements of ss.13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



The above certification is given as of the
date of the Report and is limited to the periods covered by the Report.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate on November 18, 2004.



By:

/s/ Robert G. BakerRobert G. Baker,Interim Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original or this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission of its staff upon request.
Compensation Arrangements for Certain Named Officers



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 ALLOY, INC. 
  
 COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR CERTAIN NAMED OFFICERS 
  
 Fiscal year ended January 31, 2005 (“Fiscal 2004”) bonuses and fiscal year ending January 31, 2006 (“Fiscal 2005”) salary has been set for the following named officer of Alloy, Inc., as set forth below:

  

									
	 Named Executive

	 	 Position

	 	 Fiscal 2004
     Bonus    

	 	 Fiscal 2005
     Salary    

	 	Other Compensation


					
	 Gina R. DiGioia, Esq.
	 	 General Counsel and Secretary
	 	 $20,000 payable in cash and 7,500 options (1)
	 	$200,000	 	None



	(1)	1,875 options vesting on each of June 1, 2006, June 1, 2007, June 1, 2008 and June 1, 2009. 

  
 In addition, Ms. DiGioia’s salary of $200,000 was made retroactive
to June 1, 2005.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4442

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1050 North Hills Boulevard in Reno, Nevada, as the ‘‘Guardians of 

Freedom Memorial Post Office Building’’ and to authorize the installation of a plaque at such site, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2004

Mr. GIBBONS (for himself, Mr. PORTER, and Ms. BERKLEY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1050 North Hills Boulevard in Reno, Nevada, 

as the ‘‘Guardians of Freedom Memorial Post Office 

Building’’ and to authorize the installation of a plaque 

at such site, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF GUARDIANS OF FREEDOM 

4 MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1050 North Hills Boulevard in 
2

•HR 4442 IH 

1 Reno, Nevada, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Guardians of Freedom Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Guardians of Freedom 

7 Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

8 SEC. 2. INSTALLATION OF PLAQUE. 

9 (a) AGREEMENT.—The Postmaster General may 

10 enter into an agreement with the Office of Veterans’ Serv11 ices of the State of Nevada under which the Office of Vet12 erans’ Services of the State of Nevada agrees—

13 (1) to install a plaque to be displayed at the 

14 Guardians of Freedom Memorial Post Office Build15 ing referred to in section 1(a); and 

16 (2) to maintain and update such plaque, as ap17 propriate and in accordance with subsections (b) and 

18 (c). 

19 (b) INSCRIPTIONS.—

20 (1) DEDICATION.—The plaque installed pursu21 ant to subsection (a) shall bear the following inscrip22 tion: ‘‘This post office building is dedicated in the 

23 memory of those men and women of the State of 

24 Nevada who have lost their lives while serving in the 

25 Armed Forces of the United States in the Global 
3

•HR 4442 IH 

1 War on Terrorism and in Operation Iraqi Free2 dom.’’. 

3 (2) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.—The plaque 

4 installed pursuant to subsection (a) shall also in5 clude with respect to the men and women of the 

6 Armed Forces referred to in paragraph (1) inscrip7 tions containing the names, ranks, branches of serv8 ice, hometowns, and dates of death of such men and 

9 women. 

10 (c) EXPENDITURE OF COSTS.—The agreement re11 ferred to in subsection (a) shall provide that the Office 

12 of Veterans’ Services of the State of Nevada shall have 

13 sole responsibility for the expenditure of all costs associ14 ated with the installation, maintenance, and updating of 

15 the plaque.

Æ
10930, 10936.

#### Maxwell Brothers *v.*Harrison; and *vice versa.*

Luke, J.

1. That a debtor, after the • maturity of the debt, addresses to the creditor one or more letters in which he .asks for indulgence and promises to pay the debt if its collection is not pressed will not estop him from subsequenly setting up the defense of partial failure of consideration, even though the facts upon which this defense is based were known to him at the time he wrote the payee to the effect stated, is settled in *Pearson*v. *Brown,*105 *Ga.*802 (31 S. E. 746).

*(a)*This ruling is not in conflict with *Harder*v. *Carter,*97 *Ga.*273 (23 S. E. 82), or *Lunsford*v. *Malsby,*101 *Ga.*39 (28 S. E. 496). The Supreme Court, in *Pearson*v. *Brown,*supra, pointed out the distinction.

2. It was not error to admit the evidence complained of in the motion for-a new trial.The evidence authorized, the verdict, which has .the approval of the trial judge, and for no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for. a mew. trial.

*15Decided March 3, 1920.

Appeal; from Taliaferro superior court — Judge Walker- August 27, 1919.

*J. S. Watkins,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. G. Golucke,*contra.

*Judgment on main bill of exceptions affirmed; cross-bill of exceptions dismissed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and, Bloodworth, J., concur.*
BOSTON FINANCIAL QUALIFIED HOUSING TAX CREDITS L.P. III
 (A Limited Partnership)







EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002










In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing Tax Credits L.P. III (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.











/s/Kenneth J. Cutillo


Kenneth J. Cutillo


Principal Executive Officer and


Principal Financial Officer


Arch Street III, Inc., as


Managing General Partner of


Boston Financial Qualified


Housing Tax Credits L.P. III





Date:           August 15, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
 TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Third Quarterly Report of Bio-Lok International Inc. the (Registrant) on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended July 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 5 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 **Bio-Lok International Inc**.Date: September 21, 2004

/s/ Ingo K. KozakChief Financial Officer
  18
Reengineering quantum dot optics with nanomechanical strain 

Developing and exploiting precision metrology for quantum and nanotechnology requires nanoscale 

modeling of ultrasmall devices, their dynamical operation, and their response to probes. Atomic-scale 

simulations of the electronic and optical properties of complex nanosystems are being carried out. These 

systems include nanocrystals, self-assembled dots, nanodot arrays and solids, and nanohybrids. Nanoscale 

simulations of optical fields near nanosystems are being used to design nanoprobes and nanocavities for 

precision nanooptics metrology and to model the transport of excitations in quantum devices. 

The work is providing the foundation needed to engineer nanolasers, detectors, biomarkers and sensors, and 

quantum devices. Dynamical control of excitons in quantum dots (QDs) is highly desirable for such 

applications with QDs as active optical sources and detectors. Applied strain provides a new paradigm for 

controlling QD optics and for acting as a transducer to couple dot response to mechanical motion and 

pressure. Applications include QDs as sources in nanolasers; as sources in optomechanical cavities used, 

for example, for wavelength routing; pressure and motion sensing for ultrasensitive mass detection, 

electronic skin, mechanical memory and computing; nanomechanical energy harvesting; and as transducers 

for cooling nanomechanical structures to the quantum limit. We have developed atomistic models to 

describe these highly strained structures and carried out simulations for 10 million atom structures. 

The applied strain makes dramatic changes in the exchange splitting between exciton bright states that 

modify the exciton fine structure induced by QD asymmetry and atomistic effects, induce crossing between 

bright states, and rotate the polarized response of bright states through large angles, as shown in the figure. 

Such control can be exploited in applications of QDs as entangled photon sources, where the elimination of 

asymmetric exchange splitting is essential, or cavity-coupled QDs, where tuning the exchange-induced 

dark and bright states is needed. Manipulation of exciton energies and polarizations via the strain provides 

a signature for sensing motion or applied pressure. 

Figure 2.3: Pyramidal InAs quantum dots in a flat nanomechanical beam, a beam providing biaxial 

deformation and a beam under shear. The rotation of the polarization of the ground exciton (purple) and 

exchange-split exciton induced by the indicated mechanical strain is demonstrated. 

Contact: Dr. Garnett Bryant 

(301) 975-2595 

garnett.bryant@nist.gov
#### Marial Avery *v.*Josiah Carter.

Exemptions — Soldier's Bounty and Back Pay.

The bounty and back pay of a deceased soldier wbo died in service during the Civil War, and which is made payable to the widow and children of such soldier, is not subject to the debts of the deceased soldier.

APPEAL PROM CLINTON CIRCUIT COURT.

October 16, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The bounty and back pay due to soldiers dying while in the service of the Federal Government during the late Civil war, was by the *201acts of Congress made payable to their widows and children, and not to their personal representatives. This court has heretofore held, and is still of the opinion, that such bounty and back pay in the hands of the widows of the deceased soldiers cannot be subjected to the payment of his debts.

Winfrey, *Carr, for appellant.*

*Butler, Brent, for appellee.*

Neither the debtor if living nor his creditors could reach such funds by a suit against the United States, and the Government has the right to determine in event of the debtor’s death to whom the fund remaining to his credit shall be paid. Outside of the prerogative of government this right is reserved in the contract of enlistment, and it must be respected, by the courts of the country, otherwise one of the means deemed necessary to encourage enlistments in time of war will be taken from- the law-making power by the judiciary. Our attention has not been called to any law authorizing the widow to collect and keep' the value of the horse alleged to have been paid for by the government, but appellant’s petition does not state the amount received for said horse and appellee does not disclose it in answer to interrogatives.

It was error for the court without either allegation or proof to assume that the amount was equal that of the debt sued for.

The judgment must therefore be reversed and the cause remanded.
#### Mary C. Herrick *v.*J. P. Herrick.

Husband and Wife — Right to Rents of Wife’s Land.

Whether, under the statute, the death of the husband invests the wife with the right to collect and appropriate the rents accruing on *589an unexpired lease of the wife’s land, or whether the right passes to the personal representative of the husband, is a question on which the court was equally divided.

PETITION TO MODIFY OPINION.

APPEAL FROM MADISON CIRCUIT COURT.

March 18, 1874.

*Burnam, for appellant.*

*Carpenter, Bennett, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

This court did not intend to disturb the judgment of the court below, so far as it allowed appellee to retain the rents accruing during the year in which the divorce was adjudged. We have held that a decree of divorce terminates the husband’s estate in the land of the wife, the same as it is terminated by his death. Susan E. Hays v. Sanderson & Wife, 7 Bush 489. Whilst the marriage is in existence, the husband may lease the wife’s land not exceeding three years. This court, as now constituted, has twice divided equally as to whether, under the Revised Statutes, the death of the husband invested the wife with the right to collect and appropriate the rents accruing on an unexpired lease, or whether this right passed to the personal representative of the husband. There is nothing in this case calculated to induce that portion of the court inclining to the latter conclusion, to abandon their convictions on this subject.

The petition for a modification of the opinion is overruled.
**Exhibit(10)(o)(5)**

 

AMENDMENT NO. 4

TO

ALLTEL CORPORATION 401(k)PLAN

(January 1, 2001Restatement)

 

WHEREAS, ALLTELCorporation (the “Company”) maintains the ALLTEL Corporation 401(k) Plan, asamended and restated effective January 1, 2001, and as subsequently amended,(the “Plan”); and

 

WHEREAS, theCompany desires further to amend the Plan;

 

NOW, THEREFORE,the Company hereby amends the Plan in the respects hereinafter set forth:

 

Effective as ofJanuary 1, 2003, Appendix B is amended by adding a new subsection (g) to theend thereof to provide as follows:

 

(g)           Forthe 2003 Plan Year, each person who

 

(i)            wasan active employee of Cellular XL Associates, L.P. and became an Employee onMarch 1, 2003; or

 

(ii)           wasan active employee of Western Wireless Corporation and became an Employee onSeptember 1, 2003.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, by its dulyauthorized officer, has caused this Amendment to be executed on this 10th dayof December, 2003.

 
|   | ALLTEL CORPORATION |
|--------|--------------------|
|   |               |   |
|   |               |   |
|   | By:                | /s/ Scott T. Ford |
|   |               | Title: | President & CEO |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
                        RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, 
                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
                        SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alexander Y. Tokman, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended
December 31, 2009 of Microvision, Inc.; and

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.

Date: April 30, 2010



| |  | /s/ALEXANDER Y. TOKMAN
    Alexander Y. Tokman
    Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
AMENDMENT NO. 2
                                       TO
                               ALLTEL CORPORATION
                     LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
                (As Amended and Restated as of January 1, 1993)


      This Amendment No. 2 to ALLTEL Corporation Long-Term Performance
Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 1993
(the  Plan ), is effective as of January 29, 1998.

      Article XII of the Plan, titled  DEFERRAL OF AWARDS,  is hereby amended
to provide as follows:

         Notwithstanding the foregoing, no deferrals of Awards for any
         Performance Measurement Period ending after December 31, 1997 shall
         occur hereunder; payment of those Awards may, however, be deferred
         under any other plan or arrangement of the Company according to the
         terms and conditions and to the extent (if any) provided thereunder.
 
    Article III of the plan, titled  ADMINISTRATION,  is hereby amended to
provide as follows:

         "On or about March 1 of each year, the Company shall prepare and
         deliver to each Participant who has deferred all or a portion of an
         Award in accordance with Section VII a statement regarding the
         deferred amount of the Award."


                                       77
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-60701 Conference Calendar

EDWARD DANIEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNKNOWN BRADLEY, Warden; UNKNOWN SCOTT, Counselor; WARDEN HUGHES, Assistant Warden; UNKNOWN BUIE, Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

_____________________________________________________ EDWARD DANIEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JODY BRADLEY; KNEZIE HUGHES, also known as Unknown Hughes; O. BUIE, also known as Unknown Buie; LEON PERRY; WILLIE O. SCOTT, Counselor, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 5:99-CV-41-Brs No. 5:99-CV-4-Brs

-------------------- February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Edward Daniel (“Daniel”), Mississippi state prisonerNo. 00-60701 -2- # 42550, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. Daniel challenges the credibility determinations of the magistrate judge, and he argues that the district court dismissed his complaint because he is incarcerated. This court does not re-evaluate the credibility of witnesses. See Williams v. Fab-Con, Inc. , 990 F.2d 228, 230 (5th Cir. 1993); see also Martin v. Thomas , 973 F.2d 449, 453 n.3 (5th Cir. 1992). Daniel’s argument that the district court dismissed his complaint because he is incarcerated lacks merit because the district court did not dismiss Daniel’s complaint because of his incarceration. AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Edward A. Mueller,
Joseph J. Euteneuer and Stephen E. Brilz, or any one of them, as his or her attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him or her in any and all
capacities, hereby giving and granting to said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform all and every act and thing whatsoever requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully, to all intents and purposes, as he or she might or could do if personally present at the doing thereof, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorney-in-fact and agent may or shall lawfully do, or cause to be done, in connection with the proposed filing by Qwest Corporation, a Colorado corporation, with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, of an annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, including but not limited to, such full power and authority to do the following: (i) execute and file such annual report; (ii) execute and file any amendment or
amendments thereto; (iii) receive and respond to comments from the Securities and Exchange Commission related in any way to such annual report or any amendment or amendments thereto; and
(iv) execute and deliver any and all certificates, instruments or other documents related to the matters enumerated above, as the attorney-in-fact in his sole discretion
deems appropriate.

This
power of attorney has been duly executed below by the following persons as of the 5th day of February, 2009.

/s/ EDWARD A. MUELLER Edward A. Mueller

/s/ THOMAS E. RICHARDS Thomas E. Richards


---



QuickLinks
United States Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

Louisiana

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, and has demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope

(Rev.: September 2021)

2023 to 2024

____________________________________

Katrice Lippa, Chief

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

Effective Dates: 2023-02-01 to 2025-02-01

Mass Echelon III

1000 kg to 100 kg

30 kg to 1 mg

2500 lb to 250 lb

50 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Volume Transfer, II

5 gal
11281.

#### Williams *v.*The State.

Broyles, 0. J.

1. It is well settled that while it is not incumbent upon the judge, in the absence of a timely and appropriate written request, to charge upon the subject of the impeachment of witnesses, yet where that subject is referred to in the charge, all of it that is material and applicable to the facts' of the ease should be given. *Rouse*v. *State,*2 *Ga. App.*184 (7) (58 S. E. 416); *Harper*v. *State,*17 *Ga. App.*561 (2) (87 S. E. 808).

2. In the chargs of the court in this case the only reference to the law *194upon tlie impeachment of witnesses was as follows: “ I charge you that a witness may be impeached by contradictory statements. This is one of the methods of impeachment recognized by the law.” Under the above ruling, and the facts of the case, the court erred in not giving fuller and more adequate instructions upon this subject, although no request to do so, or to charge at all upon the subject, was presented. On account of this error another trial of the case is required.

Decided April 13, 1919.

Indictment for assault with, intent to murder; from Berrien superior court — Judge Dickerson. January 10, 1920.

*Story & Story,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. D. Lovett, solicitor-general,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*