alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I,Thomas H. Ehrlich, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q****of Uranium Resources, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.               The issuer’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer andhave:

(a)  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

b)  Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosedin this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (theissuer’s first fiscal quarter of the annual report) that has materiallyaffected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

5.             The issuer’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the  issuer’s auditorsand the audit committee of issuer’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

(a)  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)  Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: November 9, 2007 |                                        |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                   |                                        |
|                   | /s/ Thomas H. Ehrlich                       |
|                   | Title:  Vice  President — Finance |
|                   | and Chief Financial  Officer                |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28933]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Mine Safety and Health Research Advisory Committee; Notice of 
Charter Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Mine Safety and Health Research 
Advisory Committee, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year 
period through November 30, 2016.
    For information, contact Jeffrey H. Welsh, B.A., Designated Federal 
Officer, Mine Safety and Health Research Advisory Committee, Centers 
for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human 
Services, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Mailstop P05, Pittsburgh, 
Pennsylvania 15236, Telephone (412) 386-4040 or fax (412) 386-6614.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Claudette Grant,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2014-28933 Filed 12-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 488

To limit the issuance of student and diversity immigrant visas to aliens 

who are nationals of Saudi Arabia, countries that support terrorism, 

or countries not cooperating fully with United States antiterrorism efforts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2003

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. GOODE, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, and Mr. DUNCAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL

To limit the issuance of student and diversity immigrant 

visas to aliens who are nationals of Saudi Arabia, countries that support terrorism, or countries not cooperating 

fully with United States antiterrorism efforts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Terror Immigration 

5 Elimination Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 488 IH 

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ISSUANCE OF STUDENT AND DIVER2 SITY IMMIGRANT VISAS TO ALIENS WHO ARE 

3 NATIONALS OF SAUDI ARABIA OR COUNTRIES 

4 THAT SUPPORT TERRORISM OR ARE NOT CO5 OPERATING FULLY WITH UNITED STATES 

6 ANTITERRORISM EFFORTS. 

7 (a) LIMITATION ON ISSUANCE OF STUDENT VISAS.—

8 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an alien may 

9 not be granted a visa for study in the United States under 

10 subparagraphs (F), (J), or (M) of section 101(a)(15) of 

11 the Immigration and Nationality Act without review by 

12 the President if the alien is a national of Saudi Arabia, 

13 a country designated under section 620A of the Foreign 

14 Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371) as a country 

15 that has repeatedly provided support for acts of inter16 national terrorism, section 6(j) of the Export Administra17 tion Act (50 U.S.C. app. 2405(j)) as a country that sup18 ports acts of international terrorism, or section 40A of the 

19 Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2781) as a country 

20 not cooperating fully with United States antiterrorism ef21 forts. 

22 (d) LIMITATION ON ISSUANCE OF DIVERSITY IMMI23 GRANT VISAS.—Notwithstanding any other provision of 

24 law, an alien may not be granted an immigrant visa under 

25 section 203(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

26 U.S.C. 1153(c)) relating to diversity immigrants without 
3

•HR 488 IH 

1 review by the President if the alien is a national of Saudi 

2 Arabia, a country designated under section 620A of the 

3 Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371) as a 

4 country that has repeatedly provided support for acts of 

5 international terrorism, section 6(j) of the Export Admin6 istration Act (50 U.S.C. app. 2405(j)) as a country that 

7 supports acts of international terrorism, or section 40A 

8 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2781) as a 

9 country not fully cooperating with United States 

10 antiterrorism efforts.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7428

RICHARD GRIFFIN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-02-677)

Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 17, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Richard Griffin seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Griffin has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMDL, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, ArthurS. Rosten, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.   /S/  ARTHURS. ROSTEN Arthur S. Rosten Chief Financial Officer November 12, 2004
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 20

- 00070

- CR

Regina Long, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY NO. 2C1606985, THE HONORABLE JOHN MICHAEL MISCHTIAN, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R F O R C L E R K T O D E L I V E R O R I G I N A L T R I A L E X H I B I T T O C O U R T

PER CURIAM

P u rsuant t o Rule 34.6(g) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure , a ppellant

Regina Long has filed an unopposed motion to transf e r two original trial exhibits , State ’ s Exhibit

#2 and State ’ s Exhibit #9, to this Court

. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.6 (g) (authori zing appellate court

to “ direct the trial court clerk to send it any original exhibit ” on any party ’s motion ).

The motion is gra nted in part , a s to State ’s Exhibit #2, and denied in part

, a s to

State ’s Exhibit # 9

. We hereby direct the clerk o f the trial court to provide the or iginal State ’s

Exhibit #2, which consists of nine

- three color photographs submitted collectively as Sta te ’ s

Exhibit #2

, to this Court on or before November 1 3 , 2020

.

It is so ordered on October 1 4 , 2020

.

Before Justices Goodwin, Tria na, and Smith

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aphton Corporation
(the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James F. Smith, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                              
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ James F. Smith           
|                       |  |     |  | James F. Smith               
|                       |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and    
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                       |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
BS faa ma | Commonwealth of Pennsylvania a County of Clearfield 080 cia November 3, 1998 7]
ee 1 H INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTER
1. TO VOTE YOU MUST BLACKEN sia 2 es aenAtOe OFFICIAL QUESTION
— THE OVAL (qua) COMPLETELY. INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTER
io fe Un el ihe nome OF an TO VOTE YOU MUST BLACKEN THE
o the left of the name y
bal candidate indicates a vote for that | 2 i oa OVAL (q@m) COMPLETELY.
candidate.
C) Bill Llovd An OVAL (@@m) blackened completely
ii = EO Mle a a icant ‘on ha to the left of the word "YES" indicates a
mS to the left of the line provided, AND | C2 Dean Snyder Vole FOR tre-gueston,
oe NAME in the space Constitutional An OVAL (qa) blackened completely
i >a C) Jack lannantuono to the left of the word "NO" indicates a
3. To vote for an individual candidate Libertarian vote AGAINST the question.
eae of another party, after blackening an | C5
oval in the Straight Party Column, = USE ONLY THE MARKER PROVIDED
blacken the oval (qgg) to the left of
Ee the candidate's name. For an office
where more than one candidate is to
=] be voted for, the og nn
blackening an oval in the Straight
Party Column, may divide his vote by an JOINT RESOLUTION 1998-1
La of cach candidate {sehom he or | Vote forthe Candidates of ONE Party | SHALL THE PENNSYLVANIA
of each candidate for whom he or CONSTITUTION BE AMENDED
ca ee ee |i Tone TO DISALLOW BAIL WHEN THe
candidates not individually marked. a a See dno ple a
an THE ACCUSED COMMITTED AN
oie oe OFFENSE FOR WHICH THE
' ivan Itkin MAXIMUM PENALTY |S _LIFE
aw co iors MARGE ; IMPRISONMENT OR THAT NO
i alma CONDITION OR COMBINATION
OF CONDITIONS OTHER THAN
: STRAIGHT PARTY COLUMN IMPRISONMENT OF THE
: ACCUSED WILL REASONABLY
HE, EM |) To vote a Straight Party Ticket YOU c Peg Luksik ASSURE THE SAFETY OF ANY
MUST BLACKEN THE OVAL (qm) Jim Clymer PERSON AND THE COMMUNITY?
am cae COMPLETELY. Constitutional
41
i. | — Republican c> Ken V. Krawchuk c YES
“ Henry E. Haller III
Se <> Democratic eee <= NO
or — _ Constitutional =
ie ® Libertarian
REPRESENTATIVE IN JOINT RESOLUTION 1998-2
a CONGRESS
46 Sth District SHALL THE PENNSYLVANIA
Vote For ONE CONSTITUTION BE AMENDED
| TO PROVIDE THAT THE
COMMONWEALTH SHALL HAVE
THE SAME RIGHT TO TRIAL BY
el Bud Shuster JURY IN CRIMINAL CASES AS
Republican/Democratic DOES THE ACCUSED?
er Ce ee c YES
i a c NO
a REPRESENTATIVE IN THE
=. GENERAL ASSEMBLY
53 74th District
= Vote For ONE
ee) Cc) Camille George \
Republican/Democratic
Bi =
Glen Hi |
Serre sco a 9 cm Bos 4)

Official General Election Ballot

© ES&S 1981
Exhibit 10.17

MOCON, INC.

DESCRIPTION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

Retainer and Meeting Fees.Each of the non-employee directors of MOCON, Inc.
receives an annual retainer fee of $10,000, paid in equal quarterly installments, without regard to the number of board of directors or committee meetings held or attended by such director, along with
an additional $500 for each board meeting or committee meeting attended in person or via telephone. The Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional annual retainer fee of $3,000, paid in
equal quarterly installments.

Stock Options.Non-employee directors are granted options to purchase shares of MOCON
common stock from time to time in the sole discretion of the board of directors.

Director Retirement Plan.Pursuant to the MOCON, Inc. Director Retirement Plan, a
non-employee director who has served on the board of directors of MOCON for at least five years will, upon retirement, receive an amount equal to the annual retainer fee such director
would have been entitled to receive during the fiscal year in which such director's retirement occurs. This payment, however, will not be made to a director who, following his or her retirement,
continues to serve as a consultant to MOCON or any of its subsidiaries. Any amount payable under this retirement plan will be paid as determined by the MOCON board of directors in its sole discretion
following such director's retirement.

Reimbursement of Expenses.Non-employee directors are reimbursed for actual expenses
incurred in attending board and committee meetings.

---



QuickLinks
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-30204 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PAUL EDWARD RHEA, also known as Carlos Olmedo, also known as Country, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 02-CR-50045-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Paul Edward Rhea, a/k/a Carlos Olmedo, a/k/a Country, appeals his sentence following a guilty plea for distribution of five grams or more of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Rhea argues that under the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000), his base offense level for sentencing purposes should have been determined with reference only to the drug quantity alleged in count one of his indictment,No. 03-30204 -2- the count to which he pleaded guilty. Rhea acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by this court’s precedent but raises it to preserve the issue for possible Supreme Court review. Rhea does not dispute that his 135-month prison term and five-year term of supervised release are within the statutory maximum for his offense. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B)(viii); 18 U.S.C. §§ 3559(a)(2), 3583(b)(1). Because Rhea’s sentence is within the statutory maximum, Apprendi is not implicated. See United States v. Fort , 248 F.3d 475, 483 (5th Cir. 2001) ( Apprendi not implicated where sentence was within relevant range for drug quantity alleged in indictment and stipulated to by defendant). This court “has expressly rejected the argument that Apprendi applies to enhancements based upon the sentencing guidelines, whether tied to quantity or some other relevant fact, which do not cause the sentence to exceed the statutory range.” United States v. Clinton , 256 F.3d 311, 314 (5th Cir. 2001) (jury trial).
AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, R. Michael Andrews, Jr., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Buffets Holdings, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalentfunctions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       /s/ R. Michael Andrews, Jr. R. Michael Andrews, Jr.    Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive Officer)    Date: September 20, 2006