alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21

                         Subsidiaries of The Registrant


<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit (21)

(21)    SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                                              STATE OF
NAME                                                       INCORPORATION


The Annapolis Banking and Trust Company                     Maryland          
Baltimore Trust Company                                     Delaware          
Bank of Southern Maryland                                   Maryland          
Calvert Bank and Trust Company                              Maryland          
The Chestertown Bank of Maryland                            Maryland          
The Citizens National Bank                                  United States     
County Banking & Trust Company                              Maryland          
Farmers & Merchants Bank - Eastern Shore                    Virginia          
The Fidelity Bank                                           Maryland          
The First National Bank of St. Mary's                       United States     
The Forest Hill State Bank                                  Maryland          
Fredericktown Bank & Trust Company                          Maryland          
Marshall National Bank and Trust Company                    United States     
MBC Agency, Inc.                                            Maryland          
  Mercantile Life Insurance Company                         Arizona           
MBC Realty, LLC                                             Maryland          
Mercantile-Safe Deposit and Trust Company                   Maryland          
  Mercantile Mortgage Corporation                           Maryland          
  Hopkins Plaza Agency, Inc.                                Maryland          
  MBC Leasing Corp.                                         Maryland          
The National Bank of Fredericksburg                         United States     
Peninsula Bank                                              Maryland          
The Peoples Bank of Maryland                                Maryland          
Potomac Valley Bank                                         Maryland          
The Sparks State Bank                                       Maryland          
St. Michaels Bank                                           Maryland          
Westminster Bank and Trust Company of                                         
  Carroll County                                            Maryland          
                                                            
Each of the foregoing subsidiaries conducts business under its corporate name.
##### 



EXHIBIT 12-4 MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Thousands of Dollars) Twelve Months Ended December 312003
    
    2002
    
    2001
    
    2000
    
    1999EARNINGSPre-tax income (loss)
    
    $
    44,808
    
    
    $
    32,449
    
    
    $
    (65,867
    )
    
    $
    163,915
    
    
    $
    162,389Fixed charges
    
    
    58,175
    
    
    
    61,651
    
    
    
    60,933
    
    
    
    61,884
    
    
    
    59,340Earnings
    
    $
    102,983
    
    
    $
    94,100
    
    
    $
    (4,934
    )
    
    $
    225,799
    
    
    $
    221,729FIXED CHARGESInterest expense
    
    $
    54,948
    
    
    $
    57,128
    
    
    $
    55,305
    
    
    $
    58,700
    
    
    $
    55,891Interest capitalized
    
    
    1,089
    
    
    
    936
    
    
    
    565
    
    
    
    811
    
    
    
    1,190Amortization of debt discounts, premium
and expense
    
    
    1,954
    
    
    
    1,844
    
    
    
    1,588
    
    
    
    1,121
    
    
    
    1,144Interest factor of rents
    
    
    514
    
    
    
    525
    
    
    
    1,095
    
    
    
    1,252
    
    
    
    1,115SFAS 133 Swap marked-to-market
    
    
    (330
    )
    
    
    1,218
    
    
    
    2,380
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Fixed charges
    
    $
    58,175
    
    
    $
    61,651
    
    
    $
    60,933
    
    
    $
    61,884
    
    
    $
    59,340Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    1.77
    
    
    
    1.53
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3.65
    
    
    
    3.74Coverage Deficiency (1)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    (66,432
    )
  (1)
    
    The earnings for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2001 were not adequate to cover fixed charges. The
amount of the deficiency was $66,432,000. The Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges excluding unusual charges would
have been 1.62.
#### Beall *v.*Beall.

Beck, P. J.

1. Under the facts of this case the court did not err in ordering the respondent in the contempt proceeding to give a new ne exeat bond.

2. The respondent filed an answer sworn to positively, but at the hearing the court ruled “that he would not consider the answer as evidence in the ease, but that the defendant would have to sustain the same' by other evidence,” and error is assigned upon this ruling. *Held:*Although the answer was not traversed, the court could proceed to determine, in the usual way, whether the facts showed that the party charged was guilty of disobedience of its order, and could require the answer to be supported by evidence, and, if not supported by evidence, could hold the party in disobedience of a prior order requiring him to pay alimony. *Gaston*v. *Shunk,*161 *Ga.*287 (130 S. E. 580). Even if it *448was error for the court to refuse to consider the answer as evidence, the respondent was not injured by this ruling, as all the material facts set forth in the answer were submitted by him under oath at the hearing; and as he testified to the material facts alleged in liis answer, the refusal of the court to consider the answer as evidence was not injurious to the respondent’s case.

No. 6646.

December 11, 1928.

*E. 8.*Griffith, for plaintiff in error. *J. A.*Miller, contra.

3. Under the evidence we can not say that the court erred in adjudging the respondent to be in contempt of court for failure to pay the alimony as ordered by the court in the prior order, and in ordering that he be confined in jail until he should purge himself of contempt by paying to the plaintiff the sum of $540, this being a reduction to less than half of the amount originally fixed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                         388,052
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               395,611
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 395,611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,597
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,002
<OTHER-SE>                                     384,012
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   395,611
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,120
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,391)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                              43
<SECURITIES>                                       352
<RECEIVABLES>                                      156
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       1794
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                            2049
<DEPRECIATION>                                     675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               75
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                         699
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4879
<SALES>                                           4439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4846
<CGS>                                             3528
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1154
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  67
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     14
<INCOME-TAX>                                         4
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 10
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        10
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
THE GOKANA TRUST, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-4661 ) ASHLEY KOZEL, et al., ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 16, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Nancy Donnellan, Senior Judge. Jesse Dean-Kluger of Jesse Dean-Kluger, P.A., Miami, for Appellant. Steven L. Brannock, Philip J. Padovano and Joseph T. Eagleton of Brannock & Humphries, Tampa; Jeffrey D. Fisher and Zachary R. Potter of Fisher, Bendeck & Potter, P.L., West Palm Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Charles O. Dunn, President and Chief Executive Officer of Mississippi Chemical Corporation (the "Registrant"), hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the period ended June 30, 2003;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Registrant and have:

1. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period this annual report is prepared;
2. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

1. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors:

1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

October 16, 2003                                                                       /s/ Charles O. Dunn
                                                                                                    
Charles O. Dunn
                                                                                                     President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 87-1158.

#### Forastiere, Chairman of the Board of Fire Commissioners of Springfield, Massachusetts *v.*Breault.

Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) I, Gandolfo Verra, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CORDIA CORPORATION;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have;  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  (c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors, any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and  6. The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: May 20, 2008 By: /s/Gandolfo VerraGandolfo VerraChief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided by the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or at staff upon request.
10305.

#### Ellis *v.*Floyd County.

Stephens, J.

1. A county is not liable to suit unless so made by law, expressly or by necessary implication. *Millwood*v. *DeKalb County,*106 *Ga.*743 (32 S. E. 577).

2. Under the provisions of code-section 748, which provides that “in every *718ease the county shall be primarily liable for all injuries caused by reason of any defective bridges, whether erected by contractors or county authorities,” the county was not liable for such damages as set out in the petition, as the same were not caused by reason of any defective bridge within the meaning of this section, but caused by reason of an alleged defective drainway or passage under such bridge.

Decided February 7, 1920.

Action for damages; from Floyd superior court—Judge Wright. January 7, 1919.

*W. B.*Mebane, for plaintiff.

*Graham Wright,*for defendant.

3. The word “bridge,” in the statute of this State giving a right o'f action against a county for defective construction, means a bridge used as an instrumentality for travel along a highway and for crossing streams or ravines. In this sense a bridge does not include a drain or opening under the bridge, although a part of the structure.

4. A county is not liable for damage to the crops or temporary use of the land, caused from water backing up and injuring an adjacent landowner by reason of a failure upon the part of the county to so construct the drain under the bridge as to prevent an accumulation of water or debris from the stream.

5. The petition in this case as amended shows an action for damages against the county, not for an injury to plaintiff’s land by reason of the erection of the bridge, and the consequent diminution in the value of his land, but for an alleged non-feasance of the county authorities in the maintenance of the excavation under the bridge, and a consequent nuisance maintained, viz., that in the winter and spring of 1917 the county negligently and carelessly permitted the space under the bridge to become filled up with debris which prevented the passage of water under the bridge and caused it to back, and overflow the plaintiff’s fields, damaging his crops and preventing him from cultivating part of his land during that year, and that the sole reason of such injury and damage1 was the damming up of the water and causing it to overflow his land. There is no element of damage to the land, or depreciation in its value, or the taking of private property for public use without compensation. See, in this connection, *Barfield*v. *Macon*County, 109 *Ga.*388 (34 S. E. 596); *Howard*v. *Bibb County,*127 *Ga.*291 (56 S. E. 418).

6. There being no authority, either express or implied, for the bringing of such a ease against a county as is set out in the plaintiff’s petition, the general demurrer thereto was properly sustained.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenlcins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          24,677
<SECURITIES>                                    59,291
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,988
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (600)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,618
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,600
<PP&E>                                           6,343
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,262)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 112,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,563
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           154
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   112,486
<SALES>                                         39,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,776
<CGS>                                           21,904
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,904
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,305
<INCOME-TAX>                                       862
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,443
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,443
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72
        

</TABLE>