alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3939 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3939

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 14-24 Abbott Road in Fair Lawn, New Jersey, as the ``Mary Ann 
                    Collura Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2004

Mr. Rothman (for himself, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. 
   Menendez, Mr. Saxton, Mr. Andrews, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Smith of New 
    Jersey, Mr. Payne, Mr. Holt, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, and Mr. 
Frelinghuysen) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 14-24 Abbott Road in Fair Lawn, New Jersey, as the ``Mary Ann 
                    Collura Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 14-24 
Abbott Road in Fair Lawn, New Jersey, and known as the Fair Lawn Main 
Post Office, shall be known and designated as the ``Mary Ann Collura 
Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mary Ann Collura Post Office 
Building''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

    <PAGE>
  
  <ARTICLE>                         UT
  <LEGEND>                          THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
                                      FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME,
                                      RETAINED EARNINGS AND CASH FLOWS OF THE NARRAGANSETT ELECTRIC
                                      COMPANY, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                                      FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
  <CIK>                             0000069659
  <NAME>                            The Narragansett Electric Company
  <MULTIPLIER>                      1,000
         
  <S>                                                                 <C>
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1996
  <PERIOD-END>                     DEC-31-1996
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS
  <BOOK-VALUE>                        PER-BOOK
  <TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>            560,183
  <OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                0
  <TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                89,938
  <TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>              56,881    <F1>
  <OTHER-ASSETS>                             0
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                       707,002
  <COMMON>                                56,624
  <CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>             80,170
  <RETAINED-EARNINGS>                  119,978
  <TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>       256,772
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
  <PREFERRED>                           36,500
  <LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                 178,517
  <SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                     5,300
  <LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                  0
  <COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>        13,725
  <LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>         32,500
  <PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                  0
  <CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                0
  <LEASES-CURRENT>                           0
  <OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>       183,688
  <TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>        707,002
  <GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>            503,585
  <INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                  11,951
  <OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>           448,123
  <TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>           460,074
  <OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>               43,511
  <OTHER-INCOME-NET>                      (732)
  <INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>        42,779
  <TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>              19,825
  <NET-INCOME>                          22,954
  <PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            2,143
  <EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>         20,811
  <COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>               9,060
  <TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>             17,205
  <CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                65,637
  <EPS-PRIMARY>                              0    <F2>
  <EPS-DILUTED>                              0    <F2>
  <FN>
  <F1>                              Total deferred charges includes other assets.
  <F2>                              Per share data is not relevant because the Company's common stock is
                                      wholly-owned by New England Electric System.
  </FN>
Order filed October 25, 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00829

- CV

____________ LOULA P. GATOURA ET AL. , Appellants

V.
NEC CORPORATION OF A MERICA, Appellee s

On Appeal from Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 4

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1092072

- 101



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this ca se was filed September 10, 2018, by Iomnis Surveillance Solutions, LLC a/k/a a nd d/b/a Iomnis Surveillance Solutions; Iomnis Surveillance; a nd Loula P. Gatoura

. To date, the filing fee of $20 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellants are excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying co sts has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P

. 5

. Therefore, the court issues the following order.2

Appellant s are ordered to pay th e filing fee in the amount of $20 5.00 to the

c lerk of this court on or before November 5, 2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be
dismissed.

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS






We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-46699),
Form S-3 (No. 333-48555) and Form S-3 (No. 333-52879) of American Industrial
Properties REIT of our report dated August 31, 1998 relating to the statement
of revenue and certain expenses of The Developers Diversified Realty
Corporation Properties which appear in the Current Report on Form 8-K/A of
American Industrial Properties REIT dated July 30, 1998.




/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
October 2, 1998
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage                     *de novo,*                     or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 15, 2014.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacquelyn K. Brunmeier, Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:

                    1.                     *Central Bank Corporation,*                     through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Central Savings Bank, and indirectly through its subsidiary Central Financial Corporation, all in Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan; to acquire no more than 20 percent of the voting shares of Lasco Development Corporation, Marquette Michigan, and thereby engage in data                           ( print page 71102)                        processing for financial institutions, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1).                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 25, 2014.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-28213 Filed 11-28-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                                                        Suite 375
                                                        2070 Chain Bridge Road
                                                        Vienna, Va 22182-2536
                                                        703-847-7500
                                                        
                                                        fax 703-848-9580


 

                                             [LOGO]
                                             GRANT THORTON LLP
                                             Accounts and
                                             Management Consultatants

                                             The U.S. Member Firm of   
                                             Grant Thorton International


We have issued our report dated October 30, 1996, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference or included in the
Annual Report of Microdyne Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 29, 1996.  We  hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of
said reports in the Registration Statements of Microdyne Corporation on Forms
S-8 (dated December 27, 1991, February 28, 1992, May 6, 1992, March 3, 1995,
November 2, 1995 and October 7, 1996).

                             /s/GRANT THORTON LLP
                             --------------------
Vienna, Virginia
December 18, 1996
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6263

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. CHRISTOPHER ANDRE ROYAL, a/k/a G , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , Chief District Judge. ( 5:16

- cr - 00317

- BO

- 2; 5:19

- cv - 00231

- BO )

Submitted : August 20, 2020 Decided: August 25, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN , and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Christopher Royal, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Christopher Andre Royal seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certi ficate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonabl e jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that t he dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. We have independent ly reviewed the record and conclude that Royal has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 08, 2022.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 08, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22D0464. BRASELTON ASC, LLC et al. v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF 

COMMUNITY HEALTH et al.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2022CV101
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Sean M. Cary, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Willamette Valley
Vineyards, Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the
small business issuer and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: Aug 14, 2006
/s/ Sean M. Cary
    Sean M. Cary
    Chief Financial Officer
No. 16,263.

#### Wilson et al. *v.*McClain et al.

Geaved *Boad.*— Board *of County Commissioners.*— Appeal *to Circuit*Court.— In the matter of the establishment of a free gravel road, an appeal can only he taken to the circuit court from a final order of the board of county commissioners.

From the Park Circuit Court.

— *Davidson*and — *West,*for appellants.

*S. D. Pratt, T. W. Rice*and *J. T. Johnson,*for appellees.

*336Filed April 22, 1892.

McBride, J.

The appellants, with others, were petitioners for the establishment of a free gravel road in Park county, under the act of April 8th, 1885, Elliott Supp., section 1472 *et seq.*At the time the viewers and engineers submitted their report the appellants presented to the board of county commissioners their written motion, asking to be allowed to withdraw their names from the petition and to dismiss the proceeding so far as they were concerned. Leave was refused, and, on motion of the attorneys for the remaining petitioners, the board made the following order:

> “And the board, being fully advised in the premises, sustains said motion, and said motion to withdraw, and remonstrance, are hereby overruled and dismissed, from which decision said remonstrators pray an appeal.”

The record does not show that any other order was made or action taken by the board. The appeal was prematurely taken, and the record presents no question for our consideration. An appeal will only lie in such cases from the final order of the board. *Neptune*v. *Taylor,*108 Ind. 459, and cases cited; *Tomlinson*v. *Peters,*120 Ind. 237, and cases cited.

The circuit court did not err in dismissing the appeal.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
No. 16,406.

#### Buckles v. State, etc.; Crumley v. State, etc.; Constant v. State, etc.; Fulkerson v. State, etc.; Johnson v. State, etc.; Brown *v.*State, etc.; Kitzmiller v. State, etc.; Lock v. State, etc.; McKay v. State, etc.; Inman v. State, etc.; Inman v. State, etc.; Edwards v. State, etc.; Barnes v. State, etc.; Martin v. State, etc.; Wayman v. State, etc.; Thornburg v. State, etc.; Fishback v. State, etc.; Wilson v. State, etc.; Caldwell v. State, etc.; Inman v. State, etc.; Stafford *v.*State, etc.; Holcraft *v.*State, etc.; Stewart v. State, etc.

No. 16,407.

No. 16,408.

No. 16,410.

No. 16,411.

No. 16,412.

No. 16,413.

No. 16414.

No. 16,416.

No. 16,417.

No. 16,418.

No. 16,419.

No. 16,420.

No. 16,421.

No. 16,422.

No. 16,423.

No. 16,424.

No. 16,425.

No. 16,426.

No. 16,427.

No. 16,428.

No. 16,429.

No. 16,430.

Filed April 30, 1892.

By the Court.

The judgment in each of the above entitled cases is affirmed upon the authority of *Racer*v. *Slate, etc., ante,*p. 393.
H. R. 4589

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To reauthorize the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grant program

through September 30, 2004, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TANF and Related Programs

Continuation Act of 2004’’.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY

FAMILIES BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2004.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Activities authorized by part A of title IV

of the Social Security Act, and by sections 510, 1108(b), and 1925

of such Act, shall continue through September 30, 2004, in the

manner authorized for fiscal year 2002, notwithstanding section

1902(e)(1)(A) of such Act, and out of any money in the Treasury

of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby

appropriated such sums as may be necessary for such purpose.

Grants and payments may be made pursuant to this authority

through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004 at the level provided

for such activities through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2002.

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 403(a)(3)(H)(ii) of the

Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(3)(H)(ii)) is amended by

striking ‘‘June 30’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30’’.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL RANDOM SAMPLE STUDY OF

CHILD WELFARE AND CHILD WELFARE WAIVER

AUTHORITY THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2004.

Activities authorized by sections 429A and 1130(a) of the Social

Security Act shall continue through September 30, 2004, in the

manner authorized for fiscal year 2002, and out of any money

in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated,

there are hereby appropriated such sums as may be necessary

for such purpose. Grants and payments may be made pursuant

to this authority through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004
H. R. 4589—2

at the level provided for such activities through the fourth quarter

of fiscal year 2002.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2238

MICHAEL H. BOSTRON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

MAURICE R. DUBOIS; JOHN E. BOYER,

Plaintiffs,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social

Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District

Judge. (CA-97-3154-H)

Submitted: November 22, 2000 Decided: January 18, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael H. Bostron, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Michael H. Bostron appeals the district court’s order granting

judgment as a matter of law to the Commissioner in Bostron’s civil

action in which he alleged employment discrimination claims. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Bostron v. Apfel, No. CA-97-3154-H (D. Md.

July 19, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED