alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1







                                                                     Exhibit 5.1

August 28, 1998


Board of Directors of
WorldCom, Inc.
515 East Amite Street
Jackson, MS  39201

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         I am General Counsel of WorldCom, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the
"Company"), and have acted as counsel in connection with a Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement") to be filed by the Company
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), with respect to 20,000,000
shares (the "Shares") of Common Stock, par value $.01, of the Company ("Common
Stock") which are to be issued upon exercise of options granted under the
WorldCom, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan, as amended (the "Plan").

         In connection herewith, I or members of my staff have examined and
relied without investigation as to matters of fact upon the Registration
Statement, the Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and the
Bylaws of the Company, certificates of public officials, certificates and
statements of officers of the Company, and such other corporate records,
documents, certificates and instruments as I have deemed necessary or
appropriate to enable me to render the opinions expressed herein. I have assumed
the genuineness of all signatures on all documents examined by me, the
authenticity of all documents submitted to me as originals, and the conformity
to authentic originals of all documents submitted to me as certified or
photostatic copies. I have also assumed the due authorization, execution and
delivery of all documents.

         Based upon the foregoing, and in reliance thereon and subject to the
qualifications and limitations stated herein, I am of the opinion that when the
Registration Statement, including any amendments thereto, shall have become
effective under the Act, and the Shares have been issued in accordance with the
terms of the Plan, then the Shares will be legally issued, fully paid and
nonassessable.

         I hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as Exhibit 5.1 to the
aforesaid Registration Statement on Form S-8. I also consent to your filing
copies of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement with agencies
of such states as you deem necessary in the course of complying with the laws of
such states regarding the offering and sale of the Shares. In giving this
consent, I do not admit that I am in the category of persons whose consent is
required under Section 7 of the Act or the rules and regulations of the
Commission.

                                             Very truly yours,

                                             /s/ William E. Anderson

                                             William E. Anderson
                                             General Counsel of WorldCom
#### John C. Walkenshaw *et al.*survivors, &c. of Hermann A. Slucher, on behalf of themselves and all other creditors of the firm of “John G. Perzel,” electing to come in, &c. plaintiffs, *vs.*John G. Perzel, defendant.

1. A notice of motion served cannot be withdrawn or countermanded, without payment of the costs of the motion.

2. But where a motion as originally noticed was, 1st. For leave to add parties defendants; and, 2d. For an injunction and a receiver; *Meld*that these motions were distinct, and that the first part of the motion might be withdrawn, leaving the second part still pending, without payment of the costs of the motion.

3. New parties cannot be added to the action without amendment of the summons ; and the summons cannot be amended, *of course,*under section 172 of the Code, but leave of the court must be obtained under section 173.

4. A plaintiff' may obtain leave to amend the summons under a general prayer contained in his notice of motion, “ for such other order or relief as the court shall see fit to grant.”

5. When a party asks leave of the court to bring in new parties, he necessarily includes in that request a further request for leave to make such amendments in the pleadings and proceedings as will show the necessity of their being made parties, and to take such steps as shall be requisite to bring them into court.

6. Provision may be made in the *order*allowing new parties to be brought in,'for the amendment of the summons and complaint, the service of the summons upon the new parties, and the service of the amended complaint upon those who were already parties, specifying in detail the proper proceedings to pursue; or it may simply allow them to be brought in, and the necessary amendments to be made to the summons and complaint, leaving the plaintiff to thereafter conduct the proceedings regularly, at his own peril.

Before Jones, J.

at chambers, December 12, 1866.)
NCNR Status Update

October 26, 2021 Photo credit: Brian Renegar
Updated “No Earlier Than Date” to Restart

April 2022
Progress to Date

Instrumental area in confinement 

building decontaminated (guide hall not 

contaminated in February incident)

Contract awarded for cleaning primary 

system

Root causes identified and corrective 

actions being implemented

Request to restart reactor submitted to 

NRC

Photo: Rob Dimeo

Reactor Operations and Health Physics prepare damaged fuel element for 

removal from reactor vessel – August 4, 2021
What remains?

Implement corrective actions to prevent recurrence

• Some depend on funding availability

Review by external consultants

• On-boarding in progress

• Could result in additional corrective actions

Clean up primary system (contract) 

Inspect/clean fuel elements (contract)

NRC process to restart

• NRC reviews request to restart and supporting 

documentation

• Requests-for-additional-information, hearings
User Program

Reactor restart date uncertain.

We will restart the reactor when

• Reactor plant has been restored to operational readiness; and

• NRC has authorized restart.

Not all instruments may be operating upon restart

Previously approved experiments not run have highest priority

We will run as many approved experiments as possible prior to the 

2023 D2 cold source outage

We are on track to start the 2023 outage near the beginning of 

CY2023
Thank you!

?
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund III, L.P. (the Registrant) for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ LEO F. WELLS, III  
| |  | Leo F. Wells, III      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | August 8, 2008         



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
| |  | Douglas P. Williams    
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | August 8, 2008
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. L E OP OL DO GO NZ AL E Z - HU R T AD O, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 50111 D. C . No . 3 : 0 8 - C R - 0 2 6 2 9 - L AB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia L a rry A . B urns , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a y 25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an d W . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L eopo l do G on za l ez -H urt ado app ea l s f rom the 57 -m on th sent ence i m po se d f ol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on f ori m por t a t i on of

c oc a i ne , i n vi ol a t i on of 21 U .S .C . § § 9 5 2 a n d 9 6 0 , a n d a id in g a n d ab e ttin g , in v io la tio n o f 1 8 U .S .C . § 2 . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n d w e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED JU N 14 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 50111 2 G on za l es -H urt ado con t ends thatthe di stri ctcourterre d b y denyi ng a m i no rrol e a dj ustm entun der the S ent enci ng G ui del i nes bec ause i t : 1) fa i l ed t o com pare hi m t o othe rl i ke l y pa rt i c i pa nt s i n the s c he m e ; a nd 2) i nc orr e c t l y de t e rm i ne d tha the ha d notm e thi s bur de n of s how i ng tha the w a s s ubs t a nt i a l l y l e s s c ul pabl e tha n the o th e rp a r tic ip a n ts in th e s c h e m e . T h e r e c o r d r e f le c ts th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u r t p r o p e r ly consi dere d G on za l es -H urt ado’ s “ cul pabi l i ty r el at i ve t o the i nv ol vem entof other lik e ly a c to r s ” in th e c r im in a l s c h e m e . Se e U ni te d State s v . R oj as -Mi l lan , 234 F . 3d 46 4, 47 3-47 4 (9th C i r. 20 00 ). A dd i t i on al l y, un der the fa ct s of the ca se , the di stri ct c o u r t d id n o t c le a r ly e rrb y d e n y in g th e a d ju s tm e n t. Se e U

n ite d S ta te s v . C a n tr e ll , 4 3 3 F .3 d 1 2 6 9 , 1 2 8 2 - 8 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) ; s e e al s o U ni te d State s v . L ui , 941 F . 2d 844, 849 ( 9th C i r . 1991) ( s t a t i ng tha tade f e nda nt“ m a y be ac our i e rw i thoutbe i ng ei ther am i ni m al or a m i no r part i ci pant , ” and that“ po ss es si on of a s ub st ant i al am ou ntof narc ot i cs i s groun ds for r ef usi ng t o g ranta s ent ence re du ct i on ”) . AF F I RME D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          22,109
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             234
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                21,484
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 7,120
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    106,577
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         142,485
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           108,538
<LOANS>                                        149,463
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 476,937
<DEPOSITS>                                     416,230
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,078
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,227
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,643
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,759
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 476,937
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,722
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,830
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   364
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,916
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,547
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  67
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,302
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       20
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,839
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,667
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,321
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,321
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,261
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.68
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.67
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,216
<LOANS-PAST>                                       444
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  5,070
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,458
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       77
<RECOVERIES>                                       111
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,512
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,512
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,405
        

</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4327

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

7450 Natural Bridge Road in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ‘‘Vitilas ‘Veto’ 

Reid Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2004

Mr. CLAY (for himself, Mr. AKIN, Mr. GEPHARDT, Mr. SKELTON, Ms. 

MCCARTHY of Missouri, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. BLUNT, Mrs. EMERSON, and 

Mr. HULSHOF) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 7450 Natural Bridge Road in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ‘‘Vitilas ‘Veto’ Reid Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. VITILAS ‘‘VETO’’ REID POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 7450 Natural Bridge Road in 

6 St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Vitilas ‘Veto’ Reid Post Office Building’’. 
2

•HR 4327 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the Vitilas ‘‘Veto’’ Reid 

5 Post Office Building.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                        23094585
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 42360675
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    2288025
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              69926283
<PP&E>                                      1189645968
<DEPRECIATION>                               409471337
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               863156717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         24478789
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          3231990
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   553318683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 863156717
<SALES>                                      123831116
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             127434174
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              43651268
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               50739
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               27109271
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9353000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           17756271
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  17756271
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
        

</TABLE>
COOL CAREERS 

IN CYBERSECURITY

Cybersecurity Career Awareness Week (CCAW) nist.gov/nice/ccaw 

Expanding Knowledge in 

Cyberawareness and Careers in 

Cybersecurity

MAKE A DIFFERENCE
#### Michael E. PRESA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 00-71611.

INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*563Submitted May 14, 2001.1

Decided May 29, 2001.

Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

Michael E. Presa, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions pro se for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we deny the petition for review.

Because Presa does not address in his petition for review the propriety of the BIA’s summary dismissal of his appeal, he has waived his right to challenge the summary dismissal. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).

The BIA did not, in any event, err in summarily dismissing the appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(d)(2)(i)(A) for insufficient specificity in the Notice of Appeal and pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.1 (d)(2)(i)(D) for failure to provide a brief on appeal after indicating in the notice of appeal an intention to file a brief or other written statement, where Presa was on notice of the risk of summary dismissal from the express warnings of summary dismissal in the revised Notice of Appeal (Form EOIR-26) and from the government’s motion for summary dismissal to which Presa did not respond. *See Toquero v. INS,*956 F.2d 193 (9th Cir.1992).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
November 2002 

E-Business –Shop Safely 

The Internet opens up a world of products and services, including some that may not 

normally be available in your area. Information is easy to find, and comparing prices 

from different sellers takes only a few minutes. By shopping around on the Internet. You 

can find some terrific buys at stores that you might never travel to in the physical world. 

Plus you can do it conveniently, any time of day or night. On the Internet you may be 

able to find it without even leaving home. The National Consumers League has indicated 

that five key issues are of great importance when safe online shopping is the goal. 

1 - Privacy Protections - Reputable Web site operators will clearly state privacy policies 

in an easily accessible place. Don’t assume that they provide the level of privacy you 

want. Understand what information is collected and how it is used. Look for sites whose 

policies or privacy programs enable you to choose whether and in what circumstances 

your personal information will be used or shared with others. 

2 – Information about the Offer – Make sure you know what you’re buying, how much it 

costs, the terms of any guarantees or warranties, the return or cancellation policies, how 

to contact the company and is the appropriate information available that provides 

accurate and adequate quantity information that permits the buyer to make price and 

quantity comparisons. This is critical when you are shopping online, since you can’t 

actually see the product or service before you buy it. 

3 – Information about the Seller – Look for the company’s physical address. You may 

need that information if there are problems after the sale. Think ahead about how you 

will solve problems if they arrive. This is especially important to consider if you are 

doing business with a company or individual far away. 

4 – Delivery Date - Know when the products will be delivered or the services performed. 

5 – Security – Good Web sites will provide information about how they protect your 

financial information when it is transmitted and stored. Your computer browser can tell 

you if the place where you are about to send information is secure. Look for an unbroken 

key or closed lock at the bottom of the browser window.