alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                 JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                            71,828
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                  1,458,747
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               1,530,575
<PP&E>                             2,660
<DEPRECIATION>                      (754)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 1,532,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            166,380
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                      851,200
<COMMON>                       1,436,055
<OTHER-SE>                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   1,532,481
<SALES>                          123,133
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 129,075
<CGS>                            162,128
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    184,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  33,522
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        0
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (89,265)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                     (89,265)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (.03)


        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-1135

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Sonya Lee Hernandez

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Ft. Dodge

____________

 Submitted: December 20, 2016

Filed: December 20, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

After pleading guilty to conspiring to distribute methamphetamine, Sonya

Hernandez appeals the district court’s below-Guidelines sentence. Hernandez’s 1

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the Northern District of Iowa.
counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief filed under Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the district court erred by not departing further, and

by imposing an unreasonable sentence. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

this court affirms.

The extent of the district court’s departure is not reviewable on appeal. See

United States v. Williams, 324 F.3d 1049, 1050 (8th Cir. 2003) (per curiam) (extent

of downward departure is not subject to review, unless defendant makes substantial

showing that district court’s refusal to depart further was based on unconstitutional

motive). This court finds that the district court did not abuse its discretion in

sentencing Hernandez because it imposed the below-Guidelines sentence after

considering the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d

910, 917 (8th Cir. 2009) (under substantive-reasonablenesstest, district court abuses

its discretion if it fails to consider relevant § 3553(a) factor, gives significant weight

to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of judgment in weighing

factors); United States v. Moore, 581 F.3d 681, 684 (8th Cir. 2009) (per curiam)

(“[W]here a district court has sentenced a defendant below the advisory guidelines

range, it is nearly inconceivable that the court abused its discretion in not varying

downward still further.”). Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), this court finds no non-frivolous issues for

appeal.

The judgment is affirmed and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

______________________________

-2-
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 72248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28598]

[[Page 72248]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control

Unblocking of a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to 
Executive Order 13224

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control 
(OFAC) is removing from the List of Specially Designated Nationals and 
Blocked Persons (SDN List) the name of one individual whose property 
and interests in property have been unblocked pursuant to Executive 
Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, ``Blocking Property and Prohibiting 
Transactions With Persons Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, or Support 
Terrorism.''

DATES: OFAC's actions described in this notice are effective November 
26, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Associate Director for Global 
Targeting, tel.: 202/622-2420, Assistant Director for Sanctions 
Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202/622-2490, Assistant Director for 
Licensing, tel.: 202/622-2480, Office of Foreign Assets Control, or 
Chief Counsel (Foreign Assets Control), tel.: 202/622-2410, Office of 
the General Counsel, Department of the Treasury (not toll free 
numbers).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic and Facsimile Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available from OFAC's Web site (www.treasury.gov/ofac). 
Certain general information pertaining to OFAC's sanctions programs is 
also available via facsimile through a 24-hour fax-on-demand service, 
tel.: 202/622-0077.

Notice of OFAC Action

    On September 11, 2014, OFAC unblocked the property and interests in 
property of the following individual pursuant to E.O. 13224, ``Blocking 
Property and Prohibiting Transactions With Persons Who Commit, Threaten 
To Commit, or Support Terrorism.'' All property and interests in 
property of the individual that are in or hereafter come within the 
United States or the possession or control of United States persons are 
now unblocked.

Individual

    1. AL-QADI, Yasin Abdullah Ezzedine (a.k.a. KADI, Shaykh Yassin 
Abdullah; a.k.a. KAHDI, Yasin), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; DOB 23 Feb 1955; 
POB Cairo, Egypt; nationality Saudi Arabia; Passport B 751550; alt. 
Passport E 976177 issued 06 Mar 2004 expires 11 Jan 2009; alt. Passport 
A 848526 (Saudi Arabia) expires 29 Mar 2001 (individual) [SDGT].

    Dated: November 26, 2014.
John E. Smith,
Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
[FR Doc. 2014-28598 Filed 12-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4199 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4199

  To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,5-thiophenediybis(5-tert-butyl-
                           1,3-benzoxazole).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2004

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,5-thiophenediybis(5-tert-butyl-
                           1,3-benzoxazole).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 2,5-THIOPHENEDIYBIS(5-TERT-BUTYL-1,3-
              BENZOXAZOLE).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following:

``      9902.34.23       2,5-               Free         No Change        No Change        On or Before 12/  ''.
                         thiophenediybis(5-                                                 31/2007
                         tert-butyl-1,3-
                         benzoxazole) (CAS
                         No. 7128-64-5)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3204.20.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NUMBER 13-21-00151-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

CYNTHIA V. BOLINGER, Appellant,

v.

MARIA GUADALUPE CONTRERAS, Appellee.

 

On appeal from the County Court at Law No.3

of Cameron County, Texas.

 

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on pro se appellant Cynthia V. Bolinger’s motion for 

emergency stay of a writ of possession. On March 9, 2021, a judgment of eviction was 

issued against Bolinger in favor of appellee Maria Guadalupe Contreras by the Honorable 

Sallie Gonzalez, Justice of the Peace, Precinct Five of Cameron County, Texas.
2

On March 15, 2021, Bolinger appealed the judgment of eviction to County Court 

at Law No. 3, Honorable David Gonzales III, presiding. Contreras filed a motion to dismiss 

Bolinger’s appeal on April 12, 2021. It is unclear from the record when Contreras’s motion 

to dismiss was granted and what supersedeas bond amount, if any, was set. However, 

on April 29, 2021, Contreras filed a motion for writ of possession, which was granted on 

May 12, 2021. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 510.13. Bolinger filed an “Appeal to Judgment” with 

this Court on May 17, 2021. Bolinger’s motion for emergency stay followed.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the emergency motion to stay, 

is of the opinion that the motion should be temporarily granted. The writ of possession is 

ordered STAYED pending further order of this Court, or until the case is finally decided. 

The Court further requests that Contreras file a response to Bolinger’s request for

emergency stay on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

28th day of May, 2021.
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Anthony E. Applebaum, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.

The Company's other certifying officers and I, are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.

The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and

6.

The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  Sept 09, 2009



| |                                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| | /s/ ANTHONY E. APPLEBAUM                  
| | Anthony E. Applebaum                      
| | Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,664
<SECURITIES>                                   327,083
<RECEIVABLES>                                  584,629
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,050
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          48,679
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,165
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,141,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        288,346
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     18,291
<COMMON>                                           218
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,349
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,141,554
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,422
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               137,981
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                15,998
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,691)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,093)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,598)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,601)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (103,006)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (103,006)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SI Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by this Report.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Rheo A. BrouillardRheo A. Brouillard President and Chief Executive
Officer March 27, 2008By:

/s/ Brian J. HullBrian J. Hull Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer March 27,
2008
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Form S-3 Registration Statement of (a) our report dated
January 22, 1998 (except with respect to the matters discussed in the Note
entitled "Subsequent Events" as to which the date is March 18, 1998) relating
to the December 31, 1997 consolidated financial statements of Lafarge
Corporation included in Lafarge Corporation's Form 10-K for the year then
ended, (b) our report dated April 15, 1998 (except with respect to the matters
discussed in the Note entitled "Subsequent Event" as to which the date is June
3, 1998) relating to the December 31, 1997 combined financial statements of the
Redland Businesses to be Acquired included in Lafarge Corporation's Form 8-K
filed June 18, 1998, (c) our report dated June 3, 1998 relating to the December
31, 1997 consolidated supplemental financial statements of Lafarge Corporation
included in Lafarge Corporation's Form 8-K filed June 18, 1998, and to all
references to our Firm included in this Form S-3 Registration Statement for
Lafarge Corporation to register $650,000,000 of Senior Notes.

                                         ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Washington, D.C.
June 18, 1998
United States Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

Idaho

2023

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international 

system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented 

measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, and 

has demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope

Mass Echelon II

30 kg to 1 mg

1000 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Mass Echelon III

30 kg to 1 mg

2500 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Weight Carts 

3000 lb to 2000 lb

Volume Gravimetric, I

5 gal

Volume Transfer, II

750 gal to 5 gal

Volume Transfer, II LPG

100 gal to 20 gal 

_____________________________________

Katrice Lippa, Chief

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

(Rev.: September 2021)

Effective Dates: 2023-02-01 to 2024-02-01
Order entered July 15, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00535-CV

JIMMY LEE MENIFEE, Appellant

V.

MAYOR ERIC JOHNSON AND THE CITY OF DALLAS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-05003

ORDER

Appellant has been deemed a vexatious litigant and is subject to a prefiling 

order, but the Court does not have an order from the local administrative judge 

allowing this appeal. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 11.101, 11.102. 

Accordingly, pursuant to section 11.1035 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies 

Code, this appeal is STAYED and will be dismissed without further notice unless, 

no later than July 26, 2021, appellant obtains an order from the appropriate local 
administrative judge permitting the filing of this appeal and files the order with this 

Court. See id. 11.1035(b).

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

YOLANDA PATRICIA GONZALEZ,

APPELLANT,

V.

IRMA PEREZ, 

APPELLEE.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00206-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2017DCM7313)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and remand the cause for further 

proceedings, in accordance with this Court’s opinion. We further order that Appellant recover 

from Appellee all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-4520

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TERRY LEON HIGHSMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CR-01-63-F)

Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 22, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, G. Alan DuBois,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M.

Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Christine Witcover Dean,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Terry Leon Highsmith appeals his 180-month sentence imposed

pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)

(2000), for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000).

Highsmith’s sole argument on appeal is that the district court

erred in sentencing him as an armed career criminal because the

predicate convictions were not alleged in the indictment. We have

reviewed the record and find this appeal foreclosed by our decision

in United States v. Sterling, 283 F.3d 216 (4th Cir.), cert.

denied, 122 S. Ct. 2606 (2002). Accordingly, the judgment of the

district court is affirmed. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED