alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

** **

**METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC.**

** **

**Certification of Periodic Financial ReportPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

** **

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of theundersigned officers of Methode Electronics, Inc. (the “Company”)certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the yearended May 2, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained inthat Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: July 2,  2009 | /s/ Donald W. Duda                                    |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | Donald W. Duda  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                      |                                                  |
|                      |                                                  |
| Dated: July 2, 2009  | /s/ Douglas A. Koman                                  |
|                      | Douglas A. Koman  Chief Financial Officer             |

 

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8No. 333-43837, No. 333-43839, No. 333-72939 and No. 333-102701, and FormS-3, No. 333-81037) of Siebert Financial Corp. and in the related prospectus ofour report dated March 30, 2007 with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Siebert Financial Corp. included in this Annual Reporton Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. We also consent to theincorporation by reference of our report dated February 26, 2007 withrespect to the financial statements of Siebert, Brandford, Shank & Co.,L.L.C. included in this Annual Report on Form10-K.

Eisner LLP

New York, NewYork
10945.

#### Johnson *v.*Harris.

Decided January 27, 1920.

Rehearing denied February 13, 1920.

Complaint; from city court of Blakely—Judge Sheffield. August 19,1918..

*B. W. Fortson,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. H. Gray,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

This was a suit upon a promissory note. The only defense' filed was the plea of payment, and upon this issue of fact the evidence amply supported the verdict for the plaintiff. Under the' facts of tho case the special grounds of the motion for a new trial are wholly without merit; and it appearing to this court that the writ of error must have been prosecuted for delay only, the prayer of the defendant in error that ten per cent, damages ’ be assessed against the plaintiff in error is granted.

*Judgment affirmed, with damages.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted
from the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,084,971
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  704,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,150,019
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,240,247
<PP&E>                                         233,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,208,901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          171,765
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,055,558
<OTHER-SE>                                    (37,322)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,208,901
<SALES>                                        952,452
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          497,886
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  470,899
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,639)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (229)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,410)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,410)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31(b)



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert H. Lazar, certify that:

| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of EnviroStar, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Robert H. Lazar

Robert H. Lazar

Principal Financial Officer

Date: October 29, 2018
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4524 

To expand the Central Command Rest and Recuperation Leave Program 

to cover transportation by members of the Armed Forces who are stationed inside or outside of the United States, but not in an area previously designated for inclusion in the program, and are granted leave 

in anticipation of deployment overseas in connection with a contingency 

operation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2004 

Mrs. KELLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To expand the Central Command Rest and Recuperation 

Leave Program to cover transportation by members of 

the Armed Forces who are stationed inside or outside 

of the United States, but not in an area previously 

designated for inclusion in the program, and are granted 

leave in anticipation of deployment overseas in connection 

with a contingency operation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4524 IH 

1 SECTION 1. EXPANDED ELIGIBILITY FOR TRANSPOR2 TATION UNDER THE CENTRAL COMMAND 

3 REST AND RECUPERATION LEAVE PROGRAM. 

4 The Secretary of Defense shall expand the Central 

5 Command Rest and Recuperation Leave Program to pro6 vide or pay for transportation for a member of the Armed 

7 Forces who— 

8 (1) is assigned to duty inside or outside of the 

9 United States, but not in an area previously des10 ignated for inclusion in the program; 

11 (2) receives orders for deployment to an area 

12 for which imminent danger pay is available under 

13 section 310 of title 37, United States Code; and 

14 (3) is granted leave in anticipation of such de15 ployment. 

Æ
Gold Medal for Leadership:

Mark Carson

Sheila Frankel

Douglas Montgomery 

Stephen Nightingale 

Darrin Santay

The group is recognized for technical leadership and innovation in the development and execution of the 

USGv6 Program that enabled the U.S. Government to meet aggressive OMB milestones for the adoption 

of IPv6 technologies. The team developed the critical standards, acquisition profiles, accreditation and 

testing programs, test suites, procurement guides, security guides, and operational test and 

measurement tools necessary to significantly improve the maturity of commercial IPv6 products and to 

guide the USG in their acquisition, deployment, and secure use. The NIST USGv6 Program provided a 

vital catalyst to the Internet industry and established the USG as a world leader in ensuring the continued 

growth and continuity of the Internet.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          56,534
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,187,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,746,591
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,404,039
<PP&E>                                       8,579,625
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,729,558)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,254,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,705,920
<BONDS>                                      5,494,364
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         77
<COMMON>                                         4,371
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,049,374
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,254,106
<SALES>                                      4,277,451
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,277,451
<CGS>                                        3,782,654
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,816,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               292,590
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             223,702
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,054,952)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,054,952)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,054,952)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.23)
        

</TABLE>
#### Benj. Anderson *v.*Mary A. & C. W. Musser.

Vendor and Purchaser — Knowledge by Purchaser of Claim of Infant.

Where a purchaser of land knew of the claim of an infant thereto, and a deduction was made from the purchase price on account thereof, but the purchaser failed to exercise diligence to ascertain the nature of the infant’s claim, he can not complain.

APPEAL PROM HARRISON CIRCUIT COURT.

March 31, 1874.

/. *B. Cleary, for appellant.*

*Cleary & West, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

There is no order to be found in either record showing that Carpenter or Mrs. Musser ever paid the purchase money for the land belonging to the infants, and we cannot well see how the chancellor can order a conveyance of infant’s real estate before the payment of the purchase money, or without retaining a lien therefor.

If the deed recited the payment of the money, the purchaser might be misled, but where there is no such recital in the deed, and no order of record showing its payment, he is placed upon inquiry to ascertain whether the money has been paid or not. This payment by the purchaser, or claim of the infant, can be easily ascertained, as it must be a part of the record in which the proceedings are had. In this case the purchaser was told of the claim of the infants before the sale was made, and a deduction from the price agreed to be paid on that account. With the exercise of any sort of diligence the appellants could have known the nature of this lien, and having failed to do so, have no right to complain.

Judgment affirmed.
2005 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

8-16-2005

Popky v. USA

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 04-2798

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Popky v. USA" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 601.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/601
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

May 31, 2005

No. 04-2798

HOWARD D. POPKY, et al., Appellants

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(E.D. of P.A. Civil No. 03-cv-01487)

Present: SLOVITER, FISHER, and ALDISERT, CIRCUIT JUDGES.

1. Motion by Appellee to Publish Opinion

 /s/ Chanel R. Graham 

Opinion & Judgment entered 5/17/05 Chanel R. Graham 267-299-4955

 Case Manager

 O R D E R 

The foregoing motion is granted.

By the Court,

/s/ D. Michael Fisher 

Circuit Judge

Dated: August 16, 2005

CRG/cc: John R. Crayton, Esq.

 Jonathan S. Cohen, Esq.

 Joan I.Oppenheimer, Esq.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed March 16, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-207

Lower Tribunal No. 13-3504 SP

________________

United Automobile Insurance Company,

Appellant,

vs.

Millennium Radiology, LLC, a/a/o Gregorio HernandezRodriguez,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Chiaka 

Ihekwaba, Judge.

Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.

David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks 

& Fleischer, P.A, and Gary Marks (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand consistent with our recent decision in United 

Automobile Insurance Company v. Millennium Radiology, LLC, 47 Fla. L. 
2

Weekly D175, D177 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 12, 2022) (“Millennium's ‘identity’ is 

not the same in each of these cases against United Auto; Millennium draws 

its identity from its assignor from case to case. The identity element of 

collateral estoppel, therefore, is not satisfied.”).
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 72560-72561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28685]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 140214138-4482-02]
RIN 0648-XD638


Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Bluefish Fishery; 
Quota Transfer

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Temporary rule; quota transfer.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS announces that the State of Maryland is transferring a 
portion of its 2014 commercial bluefish quota to the State of Rhode 
Island. By this action, NMFS adjusts the quotas and announces the 
revised commercial quota for each state involved.

DATES: Effective December 3, 2014, through December 31, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reid Lichwell, Fishery Management 
Specialist, 978-281-9112.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulations governing the bluefish fishery 
are found at 50 CFR part 648. The regulations require annual 
specification of a commercial quota that is apportioned among the 
coastal states from Florida through Maine. The process to set the 
annual commercial quota and the percent allocated to each state are 
described in Sec.  648.162.
    The final rule implementing Amendment 1 to the Bluefish Fishery 
Management Plan, which was published in the Federal Register on July 
26, 2000 (65 FR 45844), provided a mechanism for bluefish quota to be 
transferred from one state to another. Two or more states, under mutual 
agreement and with the concurrence of the Administrator, Greater 
Atlantic Region, NMFS (Regional Administrator), can transfer or combine 
bluefish commercial quota under Sec.  648.162(e). The Regional 
Administrator is required to consider the criteria in Sec.  
648.162(e)(1) in the evaluation of requests for quota transfers or 
combinations.
    Maryland has agreed to transfer 50,000 lb (22,679.6 kg) of its 2014 
commercial quota to Rhode Island. This transfer was prompted by the 
diligent efforts of state officials in Rhode Island not to exceed the 
commercial bluefish quota. The Regional Administrator has determined 
that the criteria set forth in Sec.  648.162(e)(1) have been met. The 
revised bluefish quotas for calendar year

[[Page 72561]]

2014 are: Maryland, 173,891 lb (78,875.6 kg); and Rhode Island, 607,786 
lb (275,687 kg).

Classification

    This action is taken under 50 CFR part 648 and is exempt from 
review under Executive Order 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: December 3, 2014.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-28685 Filed 12-3-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  the  undersigned,  Anthony J.  Miceli,  Chief
Financial Officer of United Capital Corp., (the "Company"), does hereby certify,
with  respect to the Annual  Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the period
ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") that:

1.          The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.          The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated:  April 29, 2005

                                             By: /s/ Anthony J. Miceli
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Anthony J. Miceli
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4266 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4266

   To reduce until December 31, 2006, the duty on potassium sorbate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2004

   Mr. Holt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To reduce until December 31, 2006, the duty on potassium sorbate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY REDUCTION OF DUTY ON POTASSIUM SORBATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.34.12       Potassium sorbate  1.0%         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 24634-61-                                                 31/2006
                         5) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2916.19.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             5,730
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      5,525
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  12,755
<PP&E>                                            31,249
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (15,065)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    64,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            340,758
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           2,869
<OTHER-SE>                                      (276,091)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      64,668
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    106,199
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  26,856
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 2,543
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (135,588)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (135,588)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.005)



</TABLE>