alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Gold Medal for Leadership:

Douglas Montgomery

Timothy Polk

Scott Rose

Stacy Cheney

Michael Ossmann

Fiona Alexander

Ashley Heineman

Vernita Harris

Kathy Smith

The group is cited for overcoming complex technical and political challenges and intense global scrutiny 

as well as soliciting unprecedented cooperation from the international community to deploy DNSSEC at 

the authoritative root zone. The group performed exceptional service to the Department and the U.S. by 

enhancing the accuracy and integrity of information supplied by the DNS that is essential tothe operation 

of systems and services using the Internet. The accomplishment assures continued stability and security 

of the Internet and continued private sector investment and innovation..
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**72 KA 10-01620**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
JOHN JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (KAREN RUSSO-MCLAUGHLIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (J. MICHAEL MARION OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boller, A.J.), rendered June 11, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed ( see People v Lococo , 92 NY2d 825, 827).

Entered: February 10, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
NIST PSCR RESEARCH INVESTMENTS BOLSTER 

MINNESOTA’S ECONOMY 

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Public Safety 

Communications Research (PSCR) Division is the primary federal laboratory 

focused on conducting research, development, testing, and evaluation for 

public safety communications technologies. Their mission is to accelerate 

communications innovation in support of public safety communities and the 

citizens they serve. 

The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 allocated $300 Million 

from the Public Safety Trust fund to NIST PSCR to perform critical public safety 

communications R&D during a 10-year period. PSCR implemented numerous 

research mechanisms to support the development and deployment of the 

Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network: grants, Small Business Innovation 

Research (SBIR) contracts, prize challenge competitions, and internal research. 

These research mechanisms were housed within six research portfolios and crosscutting initiatives to maximize their impact: 

•	 User Interface/User Experience •	 Public Safety Analytics

•	 Location-Based Services •	 Security

•	 Mission Critical Voice •	 Resilient Systems 

While the ultimate impact of these research mechanisms is the increased safety 

of first responders and their communities through improved communications

technologies, PSCR was interested in better understanding how their R&D 

investments to date result in economic impacts that ripple outward to state 

economies. An independent analysis was conducted to demonstrate how PSCR’s 

deployment of the $300 Million from the Public Safety Trust Fund translated into 

broader impacts to the United States, including jobs, earnings, value added, and 

total economic output. PSCR’s R&D investments resulted in economic output 

in 33 of the 50 states. Results of the analysis are presented here. 

For more information, see NIST PSCR’s Economic Impact Study. 

For additional information of PSCR’s research programs, visit https://www.nist.gov/ctl/pscr. 

amount.

1 Prize Challenge 

Participant 

Awards Totaling 

$0.01 Million 

MINNESOTA BY THE NUMBERS 

NIST INVESTMENT 

$0.01 Million 

OUTPUT 

$0.4 Million 

VALUE-ADDED 

$0.2 Million 

EARNINGS 

$0.1 Million 

JOBS 

1 

Output: the total value of economic 

activity circulating through the U.S. 

economy generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Value-Added: how much the 

combined U.S. state economies 

grew over a period of time due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments 

Earnings: the change in household 

earnings in the U.S. economy 

generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Jobs: the change in the number of 

full- and part-time jobs generated 

by each one million dollar change 

in U.S. economic activity due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments 

*All dollar amounts presented 

in 2022 and reflect data as of 

October 2022.

**All values are rounded; thus, the 

sum of the components may not 

sum exactly to the NIST Investment
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 19, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-0474

Lower Tribunal No. F05-5281A

________________

Raudel Robinson,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Thomas J. Rebull, Judge.

Raudel Robinson, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
PMI Complex Test Case 5 - View 1 (of 2)

Includes Atomic Test Cases - 11, 18, 19, 23, 24, 37, 42, 44

 Models - 2012

Rev D

nist_ctc_05_asme1_rd
PMI Complex Test Case 5 - View 2 (of 2)

Includes Atomic Test Cases - 25, 38, 42

 Models - 2012

Rev D

nist_ctc_05_asme1_rd
10522.

#### Newton *v.*The State.

Decided November 6, 1910.

Indictment- for murder—conviction of manslaughter; from Madison superior court—Judge W. L. Hodges. March 8, 1919.

*Gordon & Gordon, Berry T.*Moseley, for plaintiff in error.

*A. 8. Skelton, solicitor-general,*contra.

Luke, J.

Under the facts of this ease, in the absence of a timely and appropriate written request, it was not error to fail to charge the law as to reasonable fears. See *Alexander*v. *State,*118 *Ga.*26 (44 S. E. 851). Neither the evidence nor the defendant’s statement at the trial raised a theory which would require such a charge. The evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and for no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial. *Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
Exhibit 32.1

Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(b) and section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  18 U.S.C. Section 1350





I,  Tim Hunt, Chief Executive Officer of HuntMountain Resources, certify that:





1.

This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of HuntMountain Resources fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HuntMountain Resources.



Date: March 30, 2006

/s/ Tim Hunt

________________________________

Tim Hunt, Chief Executive Officer

---
#### The People v. Peter Ormsby.

*Respondent’s presence in court.*

After the regular conviction of a person charged with crime he can no longer insist on being personally present in court for farther proceedings, such as the disposition of a motion for a new trial.

Error to the Recorder’s Court of Detroit.

Submitted April 25.

Decided June 14.

Information for robbery.

Conviction affirmed.

*Charles E. Miller*for respondent appellant. •

Attorney General *Jacob J. Van Riper*for the People.

Maeston, J.

The respondent was tried and convicted upon an information charging robbery.

A motion was afterwards made for a new trial and several reasons assigned therefor, one being that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. On the 28th day of February this motion was heard, and on the second day of March was overruled and denied.

The error now complained of is, that the court did not require the presence of the respondent upon the argument and decision of this motion, and that as the court had to pass upon the facts, it was in the nature of a trial and his presence was necessary.

The record does not affirmatively show that he was or was not present. It does not show his presence during the trial and when judgment was rendered, and that no such objection was then made although an opportunity for so doing was afforded.

In *Grimm v. People*14 Mich. 308, the record showed the presence of the accused on the first day of the trial, but did not state whether he was present or absent during the intermediate days thereof, and it was held that this condition of the record was no ground of error.

*495' We need not however dispose of this case upon any question of mere presumption. After a trial has been had in open court in the presence of the accused and he has been convicted, he has no longer any right to insist upon being personally present in court when a motion is made or heard in his case. If he has such a right then for the same reason he could insist upon being brought into this Court when the case is heard and also when it is disposed of.

We find no error and the judgment must be affirmed.

Cooley and Campbell, JJ. concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                              17
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    37
<PP&E>                                             204
<DEPRECIATION>                                     195
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      46
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,059
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           360
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,737)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        46
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   966
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (966)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (966)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (966)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4531 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4531

To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct and 
          support research using human pluripotent stem cells.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2004

 Mr. Ackerman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct and 
          support research using human pluripotent stem cells.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ronald Reagan Memorial Stem Cell 
Research Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR FEDERAL SUPPORT OF RESEARCH USING HUMAN STEM 
              CELLS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting 
through the Director of the National Institutes of Health, shall in 
accordance with this section conduct and support research using human 
pluripotent stem cells.
    (b)  Conditions for Funding of Research; Compliance With 2000 NIH 
Final Guidelines.--A condition for the conduct or support of research 
under subsection (a) is that the research be conducted in compliance 
with the final guidelines regarding such research that were issued by 
the National Institutes of Health and published in the Federal Register 
on August 25, 2000 (65 FR 51976 et seq.), including provisions 
regarding informed consent and provisions regarding areas of research 
that are ineligible for funding. The preceding sentence applies without 
regard to any Federal administrative policies regarding such research 
established after the publication of such guidelines, including 
restrictions on the sources of human pluripotent stem cells.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--For the purpose of carrying 
out this section, there are authorized to be appropriated $87,000,000 
for fiscal year 2005, and such sums as may be necessary for each 
subsequent fiscal year.
                                 <all>
```
NICE Working Group

Meeting Agenda

Date: September	28,	2016 Time:	3:30 PM	ET

SharePoint: https://nistgov.sharepoint.com/sites/NICEProgram/NICEWG

I. Roll Call, Introduction, and Ground Rules

II. NICE Program Office Updates

III. Opening Remarks

a. Industry Co-Chair

IV. Standing Items

a. Fun Facts – creating a	culture of evidence

Topic: 5 Ways Agencies Can Prepare for Cyberattacks

URL: http://www.nextgov.com/cybersecurity/2016/08/4-ways-agenciescan-prepare-cyberattacks/131041/?oref=ng-HPriver

b. Report	Roundup – learning from good ideas

Topic: Improving Immigrant	Access to Workforce Services: Partnerships,

Practices & Policies

URL: http://www.aspenwsi.org/resource/improving-immigrant-access-toworkforce-services-partnerships-practices-policies-august2016/?utm_source=WSI+-

+Immigrant+Workforce+Report&utm_campaign=Accelerating+Opportuni

ty+Final+Report&utm_medium=email

c. Event	Engagement	– highlights from recent	events and upcoming events

Topic: Closing the Talent	Gap in Federal IT

d. Strategy Stories – new developments that	align to NICE Strategy

Topic: RAMPS

URL: http://nist.gov/nice/ffo

e. Metric Moment	– what	gets measured gets done

Topic: Online Training Metrics

URL: https://niccs.us-cert.gov/training/fedvte

V. Subgroup	Updates

a. K-12

b. Collegiate

c. Competitions
	 	

	 	

	 	

	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	

	 	 	

	 	 	 	

	 	

d. Training and Certifications

e. Workforce Management	(new name)

VI. Project	Progress Reports

a. National K-12 Cybersecurity Education Conference

b. NICE Annual Conference

VII.

c. NICE Challenge Project

Summary of Action Items

VIII. Next	Meeting Reminder
TASK, KNOWLEDGE,

& SKILL STATEMENTS

Task statements define

the work to be done.

Knowledge and Skill statements

NICE

FRAMEWORK

NIST SP 800-181 REV.1

CORE

COMPONENTS

define what learners (i.e.,

students, job seekers, and

employees) must know

and be able to do to

complete that work.

COMPETENCY

AREAS

A Competency Area is a

cluster of related Knowledge

and Skill statements that

correlates with one’s

capability to perform

Tasks in a particular

domain.

A COMMON LEXICON

The NICE Framework seeks to improve communication

among stakeholders throughout the cybersecurity

ecosystem about how to identify, recruit, develop, and

retain talent. Consistent use of the building blocks

enables communication at a peer level, sector level,

state level, national level, or international level, which

can drive innovative solutions to common challenges,

lower barriers to entry for new organizations and

individuals, and facilitate workforce mobility.

WORK ROLE CATEGORIES

Securely Provision

Operate & Maintain

Oversee & Govern

Protect & Defend

Investigate

Analyze

Collect & Operate

BUILDING

TEAMS

WORK ROLES

A Work Role is a grouping of

work for which an individual or

team is responsible or

accountable. Work Roles are

composed of Tasks that

correlate to Knowledge and

Skill statements.

www.nist.gov/nice/framework 3/2023
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         Subsidiaries of the Company



Allegiance Telecom International, Inc.                  Delaware

Allegiance Telecom of District of Columbia, Inc.        Delaware

Allegiance Telecom of California, Inc.                  Delaware

Allegiance Telecom of Georgia, Inc.                     Delaware

Allegiance Telecom of Illinois, Inc.                    Delaware

Allegiance Telecom of Maryland, Inc.                    Delaware

Allegiance Telecom of Massachusetts, Inc.               Delaware

Allegiance Telecom of New Jersey, Inc.                  Delaware

Allegiance Telecom of New York, Inc.                    Delaware

Allegiance Telecom of Texas, Inc.                       Delaware

Allegiance Telecom of Virginia, Inc.                    Virginia

Allegiance Telecom Service Corporation                  Delaware
United States Department of Com

National Institute of Standards and Technolo

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For: 

Montana 

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international system of units (SI), documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully 

completed training and proficiency tests, documented calibration intervals, submitted a quality management system, anddemonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate. 

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

 Scope 

Mass Echelon III 25 kg to 1 mg

2500 lb to 0.001 lb8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Weight Carts NIST Office 

2500 lb to 2000 lb

Effective Date___________Katrice Lipa

(Rev.: September 2021)
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

72 

KA 10-01620 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

JOHN JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (KAREN RUSSO-MCLAUGHLIN

OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (J. MICHAEL MARION OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M.

William Boller, A.J.), rendered June 11, 2010. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed (see People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827).

Entered: February 10, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 23
                                                                               
                                                                               
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                                       
                                       
      As   independent  public  accountants,  we  hereby  consent  to  the
   incorporation  by  reference  of our report  dated  January  13,  1997,
   included  in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996,  into
   Michigan   Bell  Telephone  Company's  previously  filed   Registration
   Statement File No. 33-51169.
   
      
      
      
      
                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 11, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4618 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4618

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 8, 2004

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 10 West Prospect Street in Nanuet, New York, as the ``Anthony I. 
               Lombardi Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANTHONY I. LOMBARDI MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 10 West Prospect Street in Nanuet, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Anthony I. Lombardi Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Anthony I. 
Lombardi Memorial Post Office Building.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 7, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 1 AND 2 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          24,891
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,136
<PP&E>                                           1,140
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (498)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,778
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              943
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           243
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,592
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,778
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,146)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,146)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      40
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,106)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>