Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 231 / Tuesday, December 2, 2014 / Notices 71385 

2For a complete description of the scope of the 

order, see Initiation and Preliminary Results. 

3See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From 

India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 51309 

(August 28, 2014). 

4 Id. 

1See Frontseating Service Valves From the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Review; 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2012– 

2013, 79 FR 30081 (May 27, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary 

Results’’). 

2 Id. 

3See letter from Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service 

Valves from the People’s Republic of China; A–570– 

933; Rebuttal, Clarification or Correction of Factual 

Information by Zhejiang Sanhua Co., Ltd.,’’ dated 

June 2, 2014. 

4See letter from Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service 

Valves from the People’s Republic of China; A–570– 

933; Request for a Hearing by Zhejiang Sanhua Co., 

Ltd.,’’ dated June 25, 2014. 

5See letter from Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service 

Valves from the People’s Republic of China; A–570– 

933; Case Brief by Zhejiang Sanhua Co., Ltd.,’’ 

dated June 26, 2014. 

6See letter to Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service 

Valves from the People’s Republic of China: 

Rejection of Zhejiang Sanhua Co., Ltd. (‘‘Sanhua’’)’s 

Submissions of June 2, 2014, and June 26, 2014,’’ 

dated October 14, 2014. 

7See Memorandum to the File, ‘‘2012–2013 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Frontseating Service Valves from the 

People’s Republic of China: Placing Additional 

Surrogate Value Information on the Record After 

the Preliminary Results,’’ dated October 14, 2014. 

8See letter from Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service 

Valves from the People’s Republic of China; A–570– 

933; Case Brief of Zhejiang Sanhua Co., Ltd.,’’ dated 

October 25, 2014. 

9See letter from Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service 

Valves from the People’s Republic of China; A–570– 

933; Withdrawal of Hearing Request,’’ dated 

October 28, 2014. 

10See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, 

‘‘Frontseating Service Valves from the People’s 

Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated August 13, 2014. 

interested parties with an opportunity to 

comment or request a public hearing 

regarding our preliminary finding that 

PPL is the successor-in-interest to PMP. 

We received no comments or requests 

for a public hearing from interested 

parties within the time period set forth 

in the Initiation and Preliminary 

Results. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is certain frozen warmwater shrimp.2

The product is currently classified 

under the following Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

item numbers: 0306.17.0003, 

0306.17.0006, 0306.17.0009, 

0306.17.0012, 0306.17.0015, 

0306.17.0018, 0306.17.0021, 

0306.17.0024, 0306.17.0027, 

0306.17.0040, 1605.21.1030, and 

1605.29.1010. Although the HTSUS 

numbers are provided for convenience 

and customs purposes, the written 

product description remains dispositive. 

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review 

For the reasons stated in the Initiation 

and Preliminary Results, and because 

we received no comments from 

interested parties to the contrary, the 

Department continues to find that PPL 

is the successor-in-interest to PMP. As 

a result of this determination, we find 

that PPL should receive the cash deposit 

rate previously assigned to PMP, as a 

part of the Liberty Group of companies, 

in the most recently completed review 

of the antidumping duty order on 

shrimp from India.3 Consequently, the 

Department will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection to suspend 

liquidation of all shipments of subject 

merchandise produced and/or exported 

by PPL and entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the publication date of this notice in the 

Federal Register at 2.49 percent, which 

is the current antidumping duty cash 

deposit rate for PMP, as a part of the 

Liberty Group.4 This cash deposit 

requirement shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

We are issuing this determination and 

publishing these final results and notice 

in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) 

and 777(i)(1) and (2) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.216 

and 351.221(c)(3). 

Dated: November 21, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28417 Filed 12–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–933] 

Frontseating Service Valves From the 

People’s Republic of China; Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On May 27, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published the preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty on frontseating 

service valves from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 The period 

of review (‘‘POR’’) is April 1, 2012, 

through March 31, 2013. The review 

covers two exporters of subject 

merchandise, Zhejiang DunAn Hetian 

Metal Co., Ltd. (‘‘DunAn’’) and Zhejiang 

Sanhua Co., Ltd. (‘‘Sanhua’’). The 

Department continues to find that 

DunAn did not have reviewable entries 

during the POR. Additionally, we find 

that Sanhua made no sales in the United 

States at prices below normal value 

(‘‘NV’’). Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we made changes to 

our margin calculations for Sanhua. The 

final weighted-average dumping margin 

for this review is listed below in the 

section entitled ‘‘Final Results of the 

Review.’’ 

DATES: Effective Date: December 2, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Laurel LaCivita, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4243. 

Background 

On May 27, 2014, the Department 

published the preliminary results of the 

subject administrative review of the 

order.2 At that time, we invited 

interested parties to comment on our 

preliminary results. 

Subsequent to the Preliminary 

Results, the following events occurred. 

On June 2, 2014, Sanhua provided 

comments on new factual information 

contained in the Preliminary Results.3

On June 25, 2014, Sanhua requested a 

hearing.4 On June 26, 2014, Sanhua 

filed a case brief.5

On October 14, 2014, we rejected 

Sanhua’s post-preliminary submissions 

referenced above.6 On the same date, 

the Department placed additional 

Bulgarian surrogate value (‘‘SV’’) data 

on the record, and set the briefing and 

hearing schedule for the case.7 On 

October 25, 2014, Sanhua filed its case 

brief.8 Sanhua was the only party to file 

a case or rebuttal brief in this segment 

of the proceeding. Sanhua withdrew its 

hearing request on October 28, 2014.9

On August 13, 2014, we extended the 

deadline for completing the final results 

until November 24, 2014, in accordance 

with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’).10

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

order is frontseating service valves, 

assembled or unassembled, complete or 

incomplete, and certain parts thereof. 

Frontseating service valves are classified 

under subheading 8481.80.1095, and 

also have been classified under 

subheading 8415.90.80.85, of the 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
71386 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 231 / Tuesday, December 2, 2014 / Notices 

11A full written description of the scope of the 

order is contained in the memorandum from 

Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Frontseating 

Service Valves from the People’s Republic of China: 

Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final 

Results of the 2012–2013 Administrative Review’’ 

(‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’), which is 

hereby adopted by this notice and incorporated 

herein by reference. 

12See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 30081. 

13See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (‘‘NME Antidumping 

Proceedings’’). 

14 ‘‘On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014).’’ 

15See Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review of Frontseating Service 

Valves from the People’s Republic of China: Factor 

Valuation for the Final Results of Review,’’ dated 

concurrent with this notice. 

16See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103 

(February 14, 2012). 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). It is possible 

for frontseating service valves to be 

manufactured out of primary materials 

other than copper and brass, in which 

case they would be classified under 

HTSUS subheadings 8481.80.3040, 

8481.80.3090, or 8481.80.5090. In 

addition, if unassembled or incomplete 

frontseating service valves are imported, 

the various parts or components would 

be classified under HTSUS subheadings 

8481.90.1000, 8481.90.3000, or 

8481.90.5000. The HTSUS subheadings 

are provided for convenience and 

customs purposes.11 The written 

description is dispositive. 

Final Determination of No Reviewable 

Entries 

As noted in the Preliminary Results, 

we received a no-shipment certification 

from DunAn.12 The company reported 

that it made no shipments of subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR. U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (‘‘CBP’’) confirmed that it did 

not identify evidence of shipments from 

DunAn. Following publication of the 

Preliminary Results, we received no 

comments from interested parties 

regarding DunAn. As a consequence, 

and because the record contains no 

evidence to the contrary, we continue to 

find that DunAn did not make 

reviewable entries during the POR. 

Accordingly, consistent with the 

Department’s refinement to its 

assessment practice in nonmarket 

economy (‘‘NME’’) cases, the 

Department finds that it is appropriate 

not to rescind the review in these 

circumstances, but rather to complete 

the review with respect to DunAn and 

issue appropriate instructions to CBP 

based on the final results of the 

review.13

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the single case 

brief filed in this review are addressed 

in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of the issues that 

parties raised and to which we 

responded in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum follows as an appendix to 

this notice. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System 

(‘‘ACCESS’’).14 ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov and in the Central 

Records Unit, room 7046 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly on the internet at 

http://www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The 

signed Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on an analysis of the comments 

received from interested parties and a 

review of the record, the Department 

has made the following changes in the 

margin calculation: 

• We derived the SVs for all factors 

of production, with the exception of 

surrogate financial ratios, using Bulgaria 

as the surrogate country.15 Specifically, 

we made the following adjustments: 

Æ We based the SVs for direct 

materials and packing materials on 

Bulgarian import statistics recorded in 

the Global Trade Atlas (‘‘GTA’’). We 

made inflation adjustments, as 

appropriate; 

Æ We based the SV for electricity on 

data derived from the National Institute 

of Statistics (Bulgaria) Electricity Prices 

covering the POR. We valued water 

using the average water rates for 

industrial consumers reported by the 

Bulgarian State Energy Regulatory 

Commission for the POR. 

Æ We based the SV for direct, indirect 

and packing labor on the Chapter 6A, 

industry-specific ILO data for Bulgaria 

from 2007, for Sub-Classification 28, 

which is described as ‘‘Manufacture of 

Fabricated Metal Products, except 

Machinery and Equipment. We made 

adjustments for inflation as appropriate. 

Æ We valued international freight 

using International freight price quotes 

from the Descartes Web site covering 

industrial plumbing supplies, valves, 

and valve parts, brass, iron, & copper, 

N.O.S., and valves and valve parts, 

N.O.S., available at http://

rates.descartes.com. 

Æ We valued brokerage and handling 

expenses and truck freight using 

information u published in the World 

Bank’s Doing Business 2014, Economy 

Profile: Bulgaria. 

See Comment 1 of the accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

• We revised the determination of the 

value-added tax (‘‘VAT’’) adjustment as 

a percentage of entered value 

(‘‘ENTVALUE’’). See Comment 5 of the 

accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Final Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, we 

determine that the following weightedaverage dumping margin exists for the 

period April 1, 2012, through March 31, 

2013: 

Exporter 

WeightedAverage Margin 

(percentage) 

Zhejiang Sanhua Co., 

Ltd. ............................ 0.00% 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed within five days of the date 

of publication of this notice to parties in 

this proceeding in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

The Department shall determine, and 

CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on 

all appropriate entries covered by this 

review pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b).16 The 

final results of this review shall be the 

basis for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise 

covered by the final results of this 

review. The Department intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of these 

final results of review. 

We will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review for each 

individual assessment rate calculated in 

the final results of this review that is 

above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.50 

percent). Pursuant to 19 CFR 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 231 / Tuesday, December 2, 2014 / Notices 71387 

17See Frontseating Service Valves from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Sunset 

Review and Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order, 

79 FR 27573 (May 14, 2014). 

351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate without regard to antidumping 

duties any entries for which the 

assessment rate is de minimis (i.e., less 

than 0.50 percent). 

The Department recently announced a 

refinement to its assessment practice in 

NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement 

in practice, for entries that were not 

reported in the U.S. sales databases 

submitted by companies individually 

examined during this review, the 

Department will instruct CBP to 

liquidate such entries at the NME-wide 

rate. In addition, if the Department 

determines that an exporter under 

review had no shipments of subject 

merchandise, any suspended entries 

that entered under that exporter’s case 

number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will 

be liquidated at the NME-wide rate. For 

a full discussion of this practice, see 

NME Antidumping Proceedings. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Because the antidumping duty order 

on frontseating service valves from the 

PRC has been revoked,17 the 

Department will not issue cash deposit 

instructions at the conclusion of this 

administrative review. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.305(a)(3), this notice serves as a 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under the APO. Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials, or 

conversion to judicial protective order, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

These final results of review and 

notice are published in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: November 24, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: The Use of SV Data from the 

Primary Surrogate Country 

Comment 2: The Department’s 

Adjustments to Sanhua’s Scrap Offset 

Comment 3: Removal from the Record of 

Rebuttal Factual Information Regarding 

the Use of Differential Pricing in the 

Preliminary Results 

Comment 4: Use of the Differential Pricing 

Analysis in the Preliminary Results 

Comment 5: Treatment of Value-Added 

Tax (‘‘VAT’’) for U.S. Sales 

5. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2014–28415 Filed 12–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–XD648 

Pacific Island Fisheries; Stock 

Assessment Review; Public Meeting 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of public meeting. 

SUMMARY: NMFS will convene a meeting 

to review a draft 2014 stock assessment 

update for main Hawaiian (MHI) Deep 

7 bottomfish. 

DATES: The meeting will be held on 

Tuesday, December 9, through Friday, 

December 12, 2014, starting at 9 a.m. 

each day. The meeting will conclude 

each day at 4 p.m., or when business for 

the day has been completed. See 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for the 

daily meeting agenda. 

ADDRESSES: On Tuesday, December 9, 

and Wednesday, December 10, 2014, the 

meeting will be held at the NMFS 

Honolulu Service Center at Pier 38, 

1129 N. Nimitz Hwy., Suite 220, 

Honolulu, HI 96817. On Thursday, 

December 11, and Friday, December 12, 

2014, the meeting will be held at the 

University of Hawaii Campus Center, 

2465 Campus Road, Honolulu, HI 

96822. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gerard Dinardo, NMFS Pacific Islands 

Fisheries Science Center, telephone: 

(808) 725–5397. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

purpose of this meeting is to review a 

draft 2014 stock assessment update for 

MHI Deep 7 bottomfish, which uses upto-date re-audited bottomfish catch and 

effort data from Hawaii state 

commercial catch reports for the years 

1948–2013. This assessment update 

used the previous benchmark 

assessment data analysis, modeling, and 

stock projection approaches with 

improved CPUE standardization. 

At this meeting, a team of reviewers 

provided by the Center for Independent 

Experts or CIE (www.ciereviews.org) will 

review the assessment methods, input 

data and parameters, including the 

adequacy of the model and model 

outputs, and suggest research priorities 

to improve understanding of essential 

population and fishery dynamics. We 

invite the public to attend this meeting 

to provide information and clarification 

if requested by the CIE reviewers. 

Meeting Agenda 

Tuesday, December 9, 2014 

1. Introduction 

2. Background Information—Objectives 

and Terms of Reference 

3. Fishery 

a. Fishery Operations 

b. Fishery Management 

4. Data 

a. State of Hawaii System 

b. Biological Data 

c. Other Data 

Wednesday, December 10, 2014 

5. Review of Stock Assessment 

Thursday, December 11, 2014 

6. Continue Review of Assessment 

7. Panel Discussions (session closed to 

public) 

Friday, December 12, 2014 

8. Panel Discussions (session closed to 

public) 

9. Review Panel Reports on Findings 

and Recommendations 

10. Adjourn 

The order in which agenda items are 

addressed may change. The meetings 

will run as late as necessary to complete 

scheduled business. 

Special Accommodations 

This meeting is physically accessible 

to people with disabilities. Requests for 

sign language interpretation or other 

auxiliary aids should be directed to 

Gerard Dinardo, NMFS Pacific Islands 

Fisheries Science Center, (808) 725– 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES