alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.4

DESCRIPTION OF THE METRO GLOBAL MEDIA, INC. DIRECTORS COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT


         On January 8, 1997, the Board of Directors of Metro Global Media, Inc.
(the "Company") unanimously approved the issuance to each Director of the
Company 600 shares of the Company's Common Stock, as well as an option to
purchase an additional 600 shares of Common Stock (the "Option"), to be issued
pursuant to the Company's 1997 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), representing
meeting fees for each fiscal year.  On March 25, 1997, the Board of Directors
adopted the Plan.

         The purpose of the Plan is to encourage officers, directors and
employees of the Company and its subsidiaries to continue their association
with the Company by providing favorable opportunities for them to participate
in the ownership of the Company and in its future growth.

         The shares and the options will be issued on January 15 of each year,
and the options will be priced based upon the average closing sale price of the
Company's Common Stock, as quoted on NASDAQ, during the month of each September
immediately preceding the January in which they are issued.  The options will
remain exercisable for so long as the recipient continues to sit on the board,  
and for a period of 90 days following the cessation of the recipient's service
on the Board, but in no event will the options remain exercisable after March
25, 2077.  Each director will be required to execute a stock option agreement
as required by the Plan.

         The shares to be issued to the directors as well as the shares
issuable upon exercise of the options will be registered with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the Form S-8 registering the Plan.
Exhibit 10.1**SOLECTRON CORPORATION****2002 STOCK PLAN****AMENDMENT TO RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT**     This Amendment to Restricted Stock Agreement (“Amendment”) is entered into as of October 11,2006 by and between Solectron Corporation (the “Company”) and Michael Cannon (the “Purchaser”).     WHEREAS, the Purchaser had previously executed a Restricted Stock Agreement dated as ofNovember 22, 2005 (the “RSA”) to purchase 750,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (the“Restricted Stock”) pursuant to a Notice of Grant of Stock Option and subject to the terms andconditions of the Plan; and     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has approved an amendment to the vestingprovisions for the Restricted Stock.     NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:     1. The second, third and fourth sentences of Exhibit A-4 to the RSA are hereby deleted intheir entirety and the following sentence shall replace the second sentence:“Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Restricted Stock shall fully vest and theReacquisition Right with respect to all Unreleased Shares will lapse on November22, 2008.”     2. Except as set forth above, all other terms, provisions and conditions of the RSA shallremain unchanged and in full force and effect.     3. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the RSA.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and datefirst set forth above.       PURCHASER:   SOLECTRON CORPORATION                Signature   By                Print Name   Title         Date:                                                             , 2006   Date:                                                             , 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7124

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WAYNE EARL JENKINS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Catherine C. Blake, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cr-00106-CCB-4)

Submitted: February 16, 2023 Decided: February 22, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Earl Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7124 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/22/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Earl Jenkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his “Motion 

to Reopen and for Reconsideration of Restitution.” But no such order exists because the 

district court has yet to resolve Jenkins’ motion. The last action that the district court took 

on the motion was ordering a Government response. To the extent that Jenkins might seek 

to appeal that order, it is not appealable. See United States v. Doe, 962 F.3d 139, 143 (4th 

Cir. 2020) (“[W]e have jurisdiction only over final orders and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders”). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7124 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/22/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
   
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
    



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

   
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this registration statement on Form S-3, to be filed on or around
June 15, 1998, of our reports dated February 20, 1997, on the Consolidated
Financial Statements of MFS Communications Company, Inc. included in WorldCom,
Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 25, 1996, as amended by Form
8-K/A filed on December 19, 1997, and to all references to our Firm included in
this registration statement.
    

                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

   
Omaha, Nebraska,
June 12, 1998.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4180 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4180

  To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide reimbursement for 
members of the Armed Forces retired for a combat-related disability for 
  travel to military treatment facilities for medical care during the 
                 first two years after such retirement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2004

 Mr. Jones of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide reimbursement for 
members of the Armed Forces retired for a combat-related disability for 
  travel to military treatment facilities for medical care during the 
                 first two years after such retirement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT FOR MILITARY DISABILITY RETIREES.

    (a) Reimbursement Based on Department of Veterans Affairs 
Beneficiary Travel Rate.--Section 1074i of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Disability Retirees.--A member retired under chapter 61 of 
this title for a combat-related disability (as defined in section 
1413a(e) of this title) shall be provided reimbursement for the travel 
expenses of such member for travel, during the two-year period 
beginning on the date of the retirement of the member, to a military 
treatment facility for medical care. Reimbursement under this 
subsection shall, as nearly as practicable, be under the same terms and 
conditions, and shall be at the same rate, as apply to beneficiary 
travel reimbursement provided by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
under section 111 of title 38.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (c) of section 1074i of title 10, 
United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with 
respect to members retired under chapter 61 of title 10, United States 
Code, on or after October 7, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4484 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Octanediol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 2, 2004 

Mr. BROWN of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Octanediol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 1,2 OCTANEDIOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following: 

‘‘ 9902.34.32 1,2 Octanediol (CAS No. 

1117–86–8) (provided for in 

subheading 2905.39.90) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 
2 

•HR 4484 IH 

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
**Exhibit
      23(b)**




ALLETE
      2007 Form 10-K








**Consent
      of General Counsel**








The
      statements of law and legal conclusions under “Item 1. Business” in ALLETE’s
      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, have been
      reviewed by me and are set forth therein in reliance upon my opinion as an
      expert.





I
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference of such statements of law and legal
      conclusions in Registration Statement Nos. 333-02109, 333-41882, 333-57104
      and
      333-147965 on Form S-3, and Registration Statement Nos. 333-16445, 333-16463,
      333-82901, 333-91348, 333-105225 and 333-124455 on Form S-8.





Deborah
      A. Amberg





Deborah
      A. Amberg


Duluth,
      Minnesota


February
      15, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict: Cognition, Diabetic Neuropathy and Metabolomics.                    

*Date:*                         December 19, 2014.                    

*Time:*                         3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Suzan Nadi, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5217B, MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-1259,                         *nadis@csr.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 72192)    
Dated: December 1, 2014.

Melanie J. Gray,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-28528 Filed 12-4-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### The Liberty Folder Co., Appellee, *v.*Anderson et al., Appellants.

(No. 145

— Decided March 21, 1949.)

*Messrs.*Pickrel, *Schaeffer & Ebeling,*for appellee.

*Mr. Sidney G. Kusworm, Mr. D. F.*Mills, *Mr. Rod*
      *434
      *ney R. Blalte, Mr. Robert D. Touvelle*and *Messrs. Myers & Myers,*for appellants.

By the Court.

This cause is submitted on motion of defendants, appellants herein, for an order of diminution of the record. It is claimed that the bill of exceptions which has been filed, through accident or error, does not contain all the evidence submitted to the trial court on the matters at issue to be presented to the reviewing court. This claim is not disputed. Whether the bill is complete will be determined by the trial court.

The court orders the bill of exceptions remanded to the trial court for any correction which the trial court considers proper. Section 11572-a, General Code.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Miller, P. J., Hornbeck and Wiseman, JJ., concur.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

PHILANTHROPIST.COM, INC., Appellant

v.

GENERAL CONFERENCE CORPORATION OF
SEVENTH

- DAY ADVENTISTS, Appellee

______________________

2021

- 2208

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No s

. 92065178, 92065255.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

D EREK M. G ILLIS

, Barton Gilman LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by C. A LEXANDER C HIULLI , Savage Law Partners, Providence, RI.

B ASSAM I BRAHIM

, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. Also represented by

B RYCE J. M AYNARD

, L AURA P ITTS

.

______________________ Case: 21-2208 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 08/08/2022T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (C HEN

, C UNNINGHAM

, and S TARK

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

August 8, 2022
Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court Case: 21-2208 Document: 40 Page: 2 Filed: 08/08/2022
#### John Lacy et al. *v.*J. F. Brown.

Appeal — Amount in Controversy — Jurisdiction.

Where the only question involved is that the trespass which turned upon the boundary and possession, did not involve title to the land, a judgment for $25 does not give jurisdiction to the Court of Appeals.

APPEAL FROM BRECKENRIDGE CIRCUIT COURT.

October 22, 1873,

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

The action for trespass as set out in the original petition of appellee involved no question of title to real property. The guilt of appellant depended alone upon boundary and possession, each party acknowledging the title of the other.

The dismissal of the amended petition seeking a specific enforcement of the aw*ard of the surveyor, left nothing to be determined except the complaint for trespass, which, as before stated, turned upon boundary and possession, and called in *234question the title of neither of the litigants. The judgment in favor of the plaintiff was for but twenty-five dollars, a sum too small to give this court jurisdiction upon the appeal of the defendant.

*J. G. Haswell, for appellants.*

*Kinchloe & Eskridge, for appellee.*

This case differs from that of Caskey v. Lewis, 15 B. Mon. 27, in which the title to land was involved, and in which the plaintiff’s right to recover depended upon the decision of the question of title.

Having no jurisdiction of the appeal, it must be dismissed.
No. 87-1226.

#### Kemp, Warden *v.*Bowen.

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8, File
No. 333-43837, File No. 333-43839, and File No.333-72939, and the Registration
Statements on Form S-3, File No. 333-81037 and File No. 333-102701 of Siebert
Financial Corp. and in the related prospectus of our report dated March 20,
2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Siebert Financial
Corp. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2005. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
February 8, 2006 with respect to the financial statements of Siebert,
Brandford, Shank & Co., L.L.C. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Eisner LLPNew York, New
York
March 29, 2006

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 OF GRAFF PAY-PER-VIEW INC.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         1165887
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8889124
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              16342999
<PP&E>                                        10708668
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5457053
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                50093066
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         12534691
<BONDS>                                       16777541
<COMMON>                                        120716
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    22938947
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  50093066
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              39189561
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 38005429
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                236397
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              814641
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 369491
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1016927
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (647436)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (647436)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
   
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

                         Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Hastings Entertainment, Inc.:

We consent to the use of our reports included herein and to the reference to
our firm under the heading "Experts" in the prospectus.


KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Dallas, Texas
June 4, 1998
#### Lane *vs.*Borst.

1. It is the duty of a referee before whom all the issues in an action are tried, to insert in his report,'when required, his findings of facts and conclusions of law. The facts so required to be found, should be those forming part of the issues presented by the pleadings, and not those merely evidentiary of them.

2. Where the defense was that the defendant delivered the note sued on to one C., to be discounted at a bank, for the benefit of the defendant,’ which was not done by him, and that the plaintiff was not the holder and owner of such note for a *bona fide*consideration before it became due; *Sold,*that the defendant had a right to have those questions specially passed upon, in the report; and that the referee-might be, therefore, directed to amend his report by inserting therein his findings upon them, to wit, the delivery of the note by the defendant to C., and its purpose; the acquisition of the ownership of such note by the plaintiff, before its maturity; and the *bona fides*of the consideration given by him therefor.

(Before Robertson, Ch. J.,

at special term, February —, 1866.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4327

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ‘‘Vitilas ‘Veto’ Reid al Service located at 7450 Natural Bridge Road

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4327

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 7450 Natural Bridge Road in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ‘‘Vitilas ‘Veto’ Reid Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4327 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 7450 Natural Bridge Road in St. Louis, Missouri,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Vitilas ‘Veto’ Reid

5 Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Vitilas ‘Veto’ Reid Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 6, 2004.

Attest:

Clerk.