alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NIST PSCR RESEARCH INVESTMENTS BOLSTER 

MISSISSIPPI’S ECONOMY 

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Public Safety 

Communications Research (PSCR) Division is the primary federal laboratory 

focused on conducting research, development, testing, and evaluation for 

public safety communications technologies. Their mission is to accelerate 

communications innovation in support of public safety communities and the 

citizens they serve. 

The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 allocated $300 Million 

from the Public Safety Trust fund to NIST PSCR to perform critical public safety 

communications R&D during a 10-year period. PSCR implemented numerous 

research mechanisms to support the development and deployment of the 

Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network: grants, Small Business Innovation 

Research (SBIR) contracts, prize challenge competitions, and internal research. 

These research mechanisms were housed within six research portfolios and crosscutting initiatives to maximize their impact: 

•	 User Interface/User Experience •	 Public Safety Analytics 

•	 Location-Based Services •	 Security 

•	 Mission Critical Voice •	 Resilient Systems 

While the ultimate impact of these research mechanisms is the increased safety 

of first responders and their communities through improved communications

technologies, PSCR was interested in better understanding how their R&D 

investments to date result in economic impacts that ripple outward to state 

economies. An independent analysis was conducted to demonstrate how PSCR’s 

deployment of the $300 Million from the Public Safety Trust Fund translated into 

broader impacts to the United States, including jobs, earnings, value added, and 

total economic output. PSCR’s R&D investments resulted in economic output 

in 33 of the 50 states. Results of the analysis are presented here. 

For more information, see NIST PSCR’s Economic Impact Study. 

For additional information of PSCR’s research programs, visit 

1 Grant Award 

Totaling $0.2 Million 

Hancock County, Mississippi 

https://www.nist.gov/ctl/pscr. 

MISSISSIPPI BY THE NUMBERS 

NIST INVESTMENT 

$0.2 Million 

OUTPUT 

$0.4 Million 

VALUE-ADDED 

$0.9 Million 

EARNINGS 

$0.6 Million 

JOBS 

10 

Output: the total value of economic 

activity circulating through the U.S. 

economy generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Value-Added: how much the 

combined U.S. state economies 

grew over a period of time due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments 

Earnings: the change in household 

earnings in the U.S. economy 

generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Jobs: the change in the number of 

full- and part-time jobs generated 

by each one million dollar change 

in U.S. economic activity due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments 

*All dollar amounts presented 

in 2022 and reflect data as of 

October 2022.

**All values are rounded; thus, the 

sum of the components may not 

sum exactly to the NIST Investment 

amount.
10449.

#### Brooks *v.*The State.

Decided October 14, 1919.

Conviction of manslaughter; from Thomas superior court— Judge Thomas. February 8, 1919.

*Eldon L. Joiner,*for plaintiff in error.

*Clifford E. Hay, solicitor-general,*contra.

Luke, J.

The court did not err in charging the jury on voluntary manslaughter, or in the failure to charge on involuntary manslaughter in the commission of a lawful act without due caution and circumspection; there is evidence to support the verdict, and the judgment is

*Affirmed.*

*Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of CompX  International  Inc.  (the
Company)  on Form 10-Q for the  period  ending  June 30,  2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A.
Bowers, Vice Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.




/s/ David A. Bowers
-------------------------------
David A. Bowers
Vice Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
August 3, 2006






Note: The certification  the registrant  furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as
amended,  or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration
Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference,  except as otherwise  expressly
stated in such filing.
10558.

#### Todd *v.*Jackson.

Smith, J.

1. The newly discovered evidence offered in support of the motion for a new trial being of such a character as probably would, if credited by the jury, produce a different result upon another investigation, the trial judge erred in overruling the motion. Although newly discovered evidence may be somewhat cumulative of testimony previously introduced, and impeaching in its character, the real ultimate criterion is the probability of a different result. *Mitchell*v. *State,*6 *Ga. App.*554 (4), 558 (65 S. E. 326); *Nolan*v. *State,*14 *Ga. App.*824 (82 S. E. 377), and cit.; *Paden*v. *State,*17 *Ga. App.*112 (86 S. E. 287).

2. The court erred in giving to the jury the following charge complained *520of in the defendant’s motion for a new trial: “Evidence has been submitted showing you the value of cotton at the time or times that it was sold by the defendant in this case. You look to the evidence and see what [was] the value of cotton at the time it was *sold,*and if you find for the plaintiff he would be entitled to recover whatever you find his interest in the cotton was worth, based upon the price it was worth at the time it was sold.” If the cropper was entitled to recover at all, the measure of damages would be the market value of his share of the crop at the time of the breach of the contract or at the time of the demand made by him upon the landlord for a settlement.

Decided November 28, 1919.

Foreclosure of lien; from city court of Newnan—Judge Post. April 7, 1919.

Jackson, a cropper of Todd, foreclosed a laborer’s lien for a sum which he contended’ was due for his share of the crop made by him on the defendant’s land. The defendant filed a counter-affidavit, denying indebtedness, and on the trial of the issue the verdict was in favor of the plaintiff. The instruction quoted in paragraph 2 of the foregoing decision relates to cotton which the plaintiff contended was a part of his share of the crop.

*A. H.*Freeman, *W. G.*Post, for plaintiff in error.

IT. *L.*Stallings, contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4478 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4478

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the 
   Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 
             through July 23, 2004, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 2, 2004

 Mr. Manzullo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the 
   Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 
             through July 23, 2004, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAMS 
              UNDER SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT 
              ACT OF 1958.

    The authorization for any program, authority, or provision, 
including any pilot program, that was extended through June 4, 2004, by 
section 1 of Public Law 108-217 is further extended through July 23, 
2004, under the same terms and conditions.

SEC. 2. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.

    Section 2 of Public Law 108-205 is amended by striking ``October 1, 
2003'' and inserting ``March 15, 2004''. The amendment made by the 
preceding sentence shall take effect as if included in the enactment of 
the section to which it relates.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the use of ourreport dated  July 16, 2004, with respect to the financial statementsof Point Lisas Nitrogen Limited, included in Mississippi Chemical Corporation'sAmendment No. 1 to its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended  June 30, 2004.

/s/ Ernst & Young                      ERNST & YOUNG Port of  Spain,TRINIDADOctober 4, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             994
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,772
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                      7,397
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,252
<PP&E>                                          11,334
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,485
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,621
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,407
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,310
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,621
<SALES>                                         58,310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,310
<CGS>                                           10,229
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,101
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,928
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 985
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    296
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                296
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       296
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,633
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,380
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     30,791
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,060
<PP&E>                                          38,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,330
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           207
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,675
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,854
<SALES>                                         40,214
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           26,543
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,396
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    66
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,818
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,386
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,352
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,352
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
IB 

Union Calendar No. 303

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3932

[Report No. 108–525] 

To amend Public Law 99–338 to authorize the continued use of certain 

lands within the Sequoia National Park by portions of an existing hydroelectric project. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2004

Mr. NUNES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Resources 

JUNE 4, 2004 

Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House 

on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on March 10, 2004] 

A BILL

To amend Public Law 99–338 to authorize the continued 

use of certain lands within the Sequoia National Park 

by portions of an existing hydroelectric project.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3932 RH 

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION TO REISSUE PERMIT. 

2 The first section of Public Law 99–338 is amended by 

3 striking ‘‘one renewal’’ and inserting ‘‘3 renewals’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

5 Section 3 of Public Law 99–338 is amended to read 

6 as follows: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 3. The permit shall contain the following provi8 sions: 

9 ‘‘(1) A prohibition on expansion of the Kaweah 

10 Project in Sequoia National Park. 

11 ‘‘(2) A requirement that an independent safety 

12 assessment of the Kaweah Project be conducted, and 

13 that any deficiencies identified as a result of the as14 sessment would be corrected. 

15 ‘‘(3) A requirement that the Secretary prepare 

16 and submit to Congress an update of the July 1983 

17 report on the impact of the operations of the Kaweah 

18 No. 3 facility on Sequoia National Park. 

19 ‘‘(4) Any other reasonable terms and conditions 

20 that the Secretary of the Interior deems necessary and 

21 proper for the management and care of Sequoia Na22 tional Park and the purposes for which it was estab23 lished.’’.

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to amend Public Law 99–338 to authorize the continued use of certain 
3

•HR 3932 RH 

lands within the Sequoia National Park by portions of an 

existing hydroelectric project, and for other purposes.’’. 
Union Calendar No. 303

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3932

[Report No. 108–525] 

A BILL

To amend Public Law 99–338 to authorize the conelectric project. National Park by portions of an existing hydro- tinued use of certain lands within the Sequoia 

JUNE 4, 2004

Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee 

dered to be printed of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and or-
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 3- 36 76

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ LaMo nt e Rydell Mart in ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lPeti ti on er

- App el la nt

v. Je ss ic a Sym

m es , W ard en , Oak Pa rkHeig ht s Fa ci li ty, Mi nn es ot a ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll ee

----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Ju ve ni le Law Cen te r; C am pa ig n fo r th e Fai r Sen te nc in g o f You th ; Ch il dr en 's Law Cen te r of Los Ang el es ; Co un ci l o n C rime andJu st ic e; Defen de r Ass oc ia ti on of Ph il ad el ph ia ; IS AIAH; J uv en il e Ju st ic e Pro ject o f Lou is ia na ; Juv en il e Ju st ic e In it ia ti ve ; Leg al Rig ht s C en te r; Na ti on al Ass oc ia ti on of C riminal Defen se Lawy ers ; Nat io na l Ce nt er fo r You th Law; Nat io na l J uv en il e Defen de r Cen te r; Nati on al Ju ve ni le Ju st ic e Network; Nati on al Lega l Ai d & Defen de r Ass oc ia ti on ; The Orle an s Publ ic Defen de rs ; Th e Pac ifi c Ju ve ni le Defen de r Cen te r; Th e Publ ic Defen de r Serv ic e fo r th e Dis tri ctof C ol um bi a; Ru tg ers Sch oo l o f Law - Cam de n Ch il dr en 's J us ti ce Cl in ic ; Sa n F ran ci sc o Off ic e o f th e Publ ic Defen de r; Yo ut h Law Cen te r; S te ph enK. Harpe r; Kri st in Henn in g; Fran k Van de rv ort ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l

Amici on Beha lf

of App el la nt (s

)

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Dis tri ctof M in ne so ta- Mi nn eap ol is

__ __ __ __ __ __Subm it te d: Apri l 1 3, 2 01 6 Fil ed : M ay

3, 2 01 6

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re MUR PHY, MELLOY, an d B ENTON, Ci rcu itJu dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ BENTON, Circu itJu dg e. Thi s cas e is be fo re th is co urt on rem an d fro m th e Uni te d St at es Supr em e Co urt. LaMo nt e Ry de ll Marti n was co nv ic te d of fir st -d eg ree m ur de r an d s e n t e n ced to li fe w i t h o u t p a r o l e . He was 17 y ears ol d at th e ti m e of th e m ur de r. Marti n arg ue s hi s se nt en ce i s i n v io la ti on of th e Eig ht h Am en dm en t, ci ti ng Mil le r v. Al ab ama , 13 2 S

. Ct

. 24 55 (2 01 2)

. Thi s co urt di sa gr eed , ho ld in g Mil le r do e s no t ap pl y ret ro act iv el y to cas es on co ll at eral rev ie w. Ma rt in v. Sym m es , 78 2 F .3d93 9 (8 th Cir . 20 15 ).
In Mar ti n v. Smi th , No. 15 -6 03 0 (Mar. 7, 20 16 ), th e Supr em e Co urt gr an te d cert io rari an d va cat ed th is co urt’s earl ie r ju d g men t ba se d on th e Mon tg ome ry cas e. Se e Mo nt

go m er y v. Loui

si an a , 13 6 S. Ct

. 71 8 (2 01 6) (ru li ng Mil le r ap pl ie s ret ro act iv el y

to cas es on co ll at eral rev ie w).

* * * * * * *
Thi s co urt va cat es Part I of it s pr ev io us op in io n whi le reaf firm in g Part II. The pr ev io us jud gm en t is va cat ed an d th e cas e rem an de d fo r pr oc eed in gs co ns is te nt wit h th is op in io n.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
<PAGE>   1



                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Fresh America Corp.

We consent to the use of our report incorporated herein by reference.

                                                      KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Dallas, Texas
August 3, 1998
1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2858

___________ United States of America, For The Use * Of Weathercraft Company of Grand * Island, a Nebraska Corporation, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Roland Glessner, an individual; * Quality Trust, Inc., a Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 5, 1999 Filed: March 24, 1999

___________ Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Roland Glessner and Quality Trust, Inc. appeal from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment for the United States “for the use of” Weathercraft Co. in a Miller Act and state law breach-of-contract action. After a-2-

careful review of the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude that no error of law appears and an extended discussion is unnecessary. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Se e8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1340

NORBET STEVEN WILCOX,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

JAMES L. MORGAN, WARDEN,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of

Kentucky in case no. 3:06-CV-496, Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell.

ON MOTION

Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The court considers whether this appeal should be dismissed.

It appears that Norbet Steven Wilcox is attempting to appeal from a decision of

the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Only the Supreme Court of the

United States has jurisdiction to review the Sixth Circuit's decision.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

Absent a response received by this court within 21 days of the date of filing of

this order, this appeal will be dismissed.

FOR THE COURT

MAY 2 9 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly

USTSMIKLITIPOR

MAY 2 9 2009

JAN HURNALY

CLERK

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk
cc:	Norbet Steven Wilcox

Todd D. Ferguson, Esq.

s19

2009-1340	 2
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4445 

To waive the time limitation specified by law for the award of certain military 

decorations in order to allow the posthumous award of the Congressional 

Medal of Honor to Doris Miller for actions while a member of the 

Navy during World War II. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2004 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas (for herself, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr. 

CLAY, Ms. LEE, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. 

BALLANCE, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. WYNN, 

Mr. CONYERS, Mr. RANGEL, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, and Mrs. 

CHRISTENSEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To waive the time limitation specified by law for the award 

of certain military decorations in order to allow the posthumous award of the Congressional Medal of Honor 

to Doris Miller for actions while a member of the Navy 

during World War II. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the time limitations specified in section 6248(a) 

4 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply with re5 spect to the posthumous award of the Congressional Medal 
2 

•HR 4445 IH 

1 of Honor under section 6241 of such title to Doris Miller 

2 (service number 356–12–35) for acts of heroism during 

3 World War II while a member of the United States Navy. 

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by 
reference in this registration statement of our reports dated January 29, 1998 
and August 22, 1997 included in Protection One, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the year 
ended December 31, 1997 and to all references to our Firm included in this 
registration statement.



                                             /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Dallas, Texas
 September 22, 1998