alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4483 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4483

           To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Hexanediol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 2, 2004

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Hexanediol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 1,2 HEXANEDIOL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following:

``      9902.34.31       1,2 Hexanediol     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 6920-22-                                                  31/2007
                         5) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2905.39.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                         494,887
<SECURITIES>                                    20,418
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     85,806
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               816,735
<PP&E>                                           7,650
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 861,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          335,499
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        29,691
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     224,883
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   861,816
<SALES>                                        133,368
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,368
<CGS>                                           55,568
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,568
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,560
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,560
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,560
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 12

GTE Hawaiian Telephone Company Incorporated and Subsidiaries

STATEMENT OF THE CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Thousands of Dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Three Months
                                                             Ended
                                                            March 31,
                                                              1998
                                                         --------------
<S>                                                      <C>           
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income from continuing operations                      $       15,221
  Add - Income taxes                                              7,857
        - Fixed charges                                          11,416
                                                         ---------------

Adjusted earnings                                        $       34,494
                                                         ===============

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                       $       10,357
  Portion of rent expense representing interest                   1,059
                                                         ---------------

Adjusted fixed charges                                   $       11,416
                                                         ===============

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                 3.02
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM UNITED
CAPITAL  CORP.'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES, THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                        13,575
<SECURITIES>                                                  27,296
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  6,016
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     390
<INVENTORY>                                                    4,207
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              50,958
<PP&E>                                                        11,359
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 6,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               133,732
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         22,544
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                         474
<OTHER-SE>                                                    58,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 133,732
<SALES>                                                       30,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              59,702
<CGS>                                                         21,808
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 46,616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              (8,266)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               22,624
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   9,298
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           13,326
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  13,326
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   2.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   2.66


</TABLE>
10663.

#### McGee *v.*The State.

Luke, J.

Where, upon the trial of one charged with possessing intoxicating liquors in violation of law, the testimony disclosed that in a barn, of which two persons had equal possession, control, and dominion, liquor was found, and there was nothing more shown than joint occupancy, control, and dominion over the barn, it was error harmful- to the defendant, who was away from home at the time of the seizure of the *269liquor and denied ownership or knowledge of the presence of the liquor in the barn, for the court, in charging upon circumstantial evidence and possession, power, custody and control over the barn in which the liquor was found, not to allude to the joint occupancy, possession, power, and control of the barn; for one might have power over, custody, and control with another of a house, and yet not know of hidden liquors stored therein. See *Hall*v. *State,*65 *Ga.*36 (3); *Shropshire*v. *State,*69 *Ga.*273; *Moncrief*v. *State,*99 *Ga.*295 (25 S. E. 735); *Lunceford*v. *Mayor &c. of Washington,*17 *Ga. App.*730 (88 S. E. 212). For the reasons given the court erred in overruling the motion for *a*new trial.

Decided October 10, 1919.

Indictment for misdemeanor; from Harris superior court— Judge Howard. May 17, 1919.

*J. B. Burnside, T. H. Shanks,*for plaintiff in erior.

*C. F. McLaughlin, solicitor,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
Registration Statement    No. 333-28537     Registration Statement    No. 333-42859     Registration Statement    No. 333-44173     Registration Statement    No. 333-59997     Registration Statement    No. 333-68747     Registration Statement    No. 333-38792     Registration Statement    No. 333-52822     Registration Statement    No. 333-83374     Registration Statement    No. 333-97937     Registration Statement    No. 333-105098     Registration Statement    No. 333-109802     Registration Statement    No. 333-122639     Registration Statement    No. 333-132911     Medium Term Notes:     Registration Statement    No. 2-96315     Registration Statement    No. 33-03079     Registration Statement    No. 33-05125     Registration Statement    No. 33-09910     Registration Statement    No. 33-16165     Registration Statement    No. 33-19820     Registration Statement    No. 33-23605     Registration Statement    No. 33-27549     Registration Statement    No. 33-38879  /s/ Deloitte    & Touche LLP         New York, New York    February 23, 2009
Exhibit
        10.25

      


      October
        14, 2005

      


      Ms.
        Barbara Pifel

      Weill
        Medical College of Cornell University

      Senior
        Director of Grants & Contracts

      1300
        York
        Avenue, Box 89

      New
        York,
        NY 10021 

      


      
        	
                Re:

              	
                Sponsored
                  Research Agreement between Marc Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Weill
                  Medical
                  College of Cornell University dated January 22, 2004 (the
                  “Agreement”)

              


      

      


      Dear
        Barbara:

      


      Pursuant
        to that certain letter dated August 1, 2005, Weill Medical College of Cornell
        University (“Weill”) and Marc Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Marc”) agreed that the
        second payment to be made under section 4.1 of the Sponsored Research Agreement,
        which provided that $187,500 was to be paid by July 1, 2005, would be
        restructured as follows:

      


      
        	
                August
                  16, 2005

              	
                $50,000
                  

              
	
                September
                  16, 2005 

              	
                $68,750
                  

              
	
                October
                  16, 2005

              	
                $68,750
                  

              


      

      


      The
        final
        installment of $68,750, due on October 16, 2005, will be paid to Weill on
        December 1, 2005. 

      


      If
        the
        foregoing is acceptable to you, please sign and return the enclosed copy
        of this
        letter.

      


      Sincerely,

      


      Marc
        Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


      


      By:
        ______________________

      Name:
        Robert M. Cohen

      Title:
        CEO & President 

      


      


      Weill
        Medical College of Cornell University


      


      By:
        ________________________

      Name:______________________

      Title:
        _______________________

      


      Principal
        Investigator

      


      ______________________

      Dr.
        Brij
        Saxena
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

I N RE:

FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS APPROVED

AS DEPOSITORIES FOR FIDUCIARY

ACCOUNTS :

:

:

:

:

:

: NO

. 181

DISCIPLINARY RULES

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of August

, 201 9

, it is hereby Ordered that the financial

inst itutions named on the attached l ist are approved as depositories for fiduciary accounts

in accordance with Pa.R.D.E. 221.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genus, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, Shum Mukherjee,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (3)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (4)  the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                   By:
                                      --------------------------
                                   Shum Mukherjee
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   Date:
                                        -------------


                                       38
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32  TEMPCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tempco, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stanley L. Schloz, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  By:/s/ Stanley L. SchlozStanley L. Schloz
President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDated:May 2, 2011
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 29, 2013

h0422 

# Order

April 29, 2013

146443

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146443

COA: 310689

Ingham CC: 02

- 000493

- FC

SEAN ADAM ROGERS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 8, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
10829.

#### Kendrick *v.*Battle *et al.*

Decided January 7, 1920.

Luke, J.

Where a remittitur from this court is made the judgment of the lower court, the latter court can not render another judgment against the sureties upon a supersedeas bond for a sum of money additional to the amount of the original judgment. In this case the court did not err in sustaining, upon the evidence offered, the affidavit of illegality. See *Corbin*v. *McCrary,*23 *Ga. App.*780 (96 S. E. 445.

*■Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Blood/worth, J., concur.*

*677Affidavit of illegality; from Taliaferro superior court—Judge Walker. June 26, 1919.

*James A. Mitchell, Alvin G.*Golucke, for plaintiff.

*Hawes Cloud,*for defendant.
**Exhibit 10.2**

**AMENDMENT TO THE MILLIPORE CORPORATION**

**2000 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR SENIOR MANAGEMENT**

(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2008) 

WHEREAS Millipore Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Millipore Corporation 2000 Deferred Compensation Plan for Senior Management (as amended and restated effective January 1, 2008) (the“Plan”); 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) mayamend the Plan, subject to certain exceptions not relevant hereto; 

WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan to provide for de miniscash out of benefits under the Plan in specified circumstances up to an annual limit, which shall be less than the applicable dollar amount under Section 402(g)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code; 

WHEREAS, the Board has considered the proposed amendment and wishes to adopt the amendment; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective on the date hereof, as follows: 

1. The second sentence of Section 6.4 is hereby amended, to read in its entirety as follows: 

“An installment payment election shall not be effective as to his or her Account if, at the time installment payments are to commence, the value ofthe Participant’s Account, when combined with any amounts payable to the Participant pursuant to any other nonqualified deferred compensation plan that would be required to be aggregated with the Plan for purposes of Section 1.409A-1(c)(2)of the Treasury Regulations, is less than the applicable dollar amount under Section 402(g)(1)(B) of the Code, in which case such Account shall be paid (consistent with the cashout rules under Section 409A) in the form of a single lump sumcash payment as soon as administratively practicable, but in no event later than ninety (90) days after the date on which payment would have commenced.” 

2. Full Force and Effect. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with the terms thereof. 

3. Governing Law. The validity, interpretation, construction, performance and enforcement of these amendments shall be governed by the laws of theCommonwealth of Massachusetts without giving effect to the principles of conflict of laws thereof. 

IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Company hascaused this amendment to be executed this 4th day of December, 2008.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J OS E J AV I E RR UI Z - P E L AY O, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 09- 30206 D. C. No . 4 : 0 8 - CR - 0 0 1 4 8 - SE H ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe D i s tr i c tof

M ont a na S a m E . H a ddon, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a y25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jose Javi erR ui z- P el ay o app ea l s f rom the 70 -m on th sent ence i m po se d f o llo w in g h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n f o rc o n s p ir a c yto p o s s e s s w ith in te n t to



# FI LED JU N 10 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 30206 2 d is tr ib u te 5 0 g r a m s o rm o r e o f m e th a m p h e ta m in e , in v io la tio n o f 2 1 U .S .C . § 8 4 6 . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. R ui z - P e l a y o c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtpr oc e dur a l l ye rr e d byne gl e c t i ng to m e a n in g f

u llyc o n s id e ra n da d d r e s s a ll o f th e f a c to r s s e t f

o rth in 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) . S p e c if

ic a lly , R u iz - P e lay o c o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt f a ile dto s pe c i f i c a l l ya ddr e s s hi s m i t i ga t i ng a r gum e nt s a nd tha ti ta tt a c he d t oo m uc h w e i ght t o the G ui de l i ne s r a nge . T he r e c or d r e f l e c t s tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtpr ovi de d a r e a s o n e ds e n te n c in g e x p la n a tio n a n dd idn o t o th e rw is e p r o c e du r a llye rr . See U n ite d S ta tes v . Ca r ty , 5 2 0 F .3 d9 8 4 , 9 9 1 - 9 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( e n b a n c ) ; see a l so U n ite d S ta tes v . D ia z -A r

g u e ta , 5 6 4 F .3 d1 0 4 7 , 1 0 5 1 - 5 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . R u iz - P e la y o a ls o c o n te n d s th a t h is s e n te n c e is s u b s tan tiv e lyu n r e a s o n ab le . T he re cord dem on strat es that , un der the t ot al i ty of the ci rc um st ance s, R ui zP el ay o’ s 70-m on th sent ence i s s ub st ant i vel y r ea sonabl e. See G al l v. U ni ted States , 55 2 U . S . 38 , 51 -52 (20 07 ); s e e a ls o U n ite d S ta tes v . N

ic h o ls , 464 F . 3d 1117, 1124 ( 9th C i r . 2006) ( “ [ T ] he que s t i on be f or e us i s notthe r e a s onabl e ne s s of [ the defe nd ant ’ s] and the go vernm ent ’ s r equest ed se nt ence , bu trather w hether the ul t i m at e s ent ence i m po se d i s r ea sonabl e. ”) (i nt ernal qu ot at i on s om i tt ed). AF F I RME D.
1

Implementation of NIST’s Restoration of Rigid-Body Condition

(RRBC) Method
2

CONTACT: 

Marek Franaszek, marek@nist.gov

Gerry Cheok, cheok@nist.gov