alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

                    SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS AND RETIREMENT PLAN
                          FOR KEY SALARIED EMPLOYES OF
                              MILLIPORE CORPORATION

                                    Amendment

     WHEREAS Millipore Corporation (the "Company") established the Supplemental
Savings and Retirement Plan for Key Salaried Employees of Millipore Corporation
(the "Plan"), effective January 1, 1985; and

     WHEREAS the Company retained the right to amend the Plan from time to time
and to interpret its provisions; and

     WHEREAS the Company now desires to amend the Plan to provide for the
transfer to the Mykrolis Corporation 2001 Deferred Compensation Plan for Senior
Management of certain liabilities attributable to Participants whose employment
is transferred to Mykrolis Corporation;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Company adopts the following amendments, effective
April 1, 2001:

      1. Section 3 is amended to add a new Section 3.6 to read as follows:

         "3.6 Mykrolis Corporation Employees. Effective April 1, 2001
         (or such later date on which the Participant's employment is
         transferred from Millipore Corporation to Mykrolis
         Corporation), each Participant who becomes an employee of
         Mykrolis Corporation on or after such date shall cease to
         participate in the Plan and shall not be permitted to defer
         any further compensation pursuant to the Plan. In addition and
         subject to the consent of each affected Participant, effective
         as of such date the liability for all benefits due hereunder
         to all Participants who become employees of Mykrolis
         Corporation shall be transferred to the Mykrolis Corporation
         2001 Deferred Compensation Plan for Senior Management
         ("Mykrolis Plan"). After such date, the affected Participants
         shall be entitled to benefits only from the Mykrolis Plan and
         shall not be entitled to any


                                      -1-

<PAGE>

         benefits from this Plan. The transfer of employment from
         Millipore Corporation to Mykrolis Corporation shall not be
         deemed a termination of employment for purposes of this Plan,
         and effective April 1, 2001, Participants whose employment is
         transferred to Mykrolis Corporation shall not be entitled to a
         distribution hereunder."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, MILLIPORE CORPORATION has caused this document to be
executed this 31st day of March, 2001.

                                            MILLIPORE CORPORATION



                                            By: /s/ Jeffrey Rudin
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Jeffrey Rudin
                                                Vice President, General Counsel


                                       -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1998
<CASH>                                              59
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,785
<ALLOWANCES>                                       795
<INVENTORY>                                     10,283
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,977
<PP&E>                                          12,399
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,003
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,227
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,219
<SALES>                                         67,064
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,064
<CGS>                                           44,409
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,409
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   725
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 847
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,073
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,114
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,114
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,958
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   188.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   188.79     
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

Certification

I, James H. Moore, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Mines Management, Inc.

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 2, 2005

/s/ James H. Moore



James H. Moore

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000065666
<NAME> MICHIGAN RIVET CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         660,398
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,737,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,153,130
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,351,010
<PP&E>                                      25,016,189
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,831,463
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,540,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,534,715
<BONDS>                                      2,531,337
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       638,525
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,022,183
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,540,330
<SALES>                                     43,013,303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,013,303
<CGS>                                       36,790,532
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               36,790,532
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,585,020
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             323,853
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,313,898
<INCOME-TAX>                                   787,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,526,898
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,526,898
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.39
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-121090,No. 333-71042, No. 333-48356, and No. 333-49671 and Form S-3No. 333-123806), as amended, and in the related Prospectus of MethodeElectronics, Inc. of our reports dated June 30, 2010 with respect tothe consolidated financial statements and schedule of Methode Electronics, Inc.,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of MethodeElectronics, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended May 1, 2010.

 

 
|                   | /s/Ernst & Young LLP |
|------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                   |                          |
| Chicago, Illinois |                          |
| July 1, 2010           |                          |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 2.1.1
 
                                October 12, 1998
 
David H. Hawk, President
S-Sixteen Holding Company
999 Main Street
11th Floor
Boise, ID 83702
 
  Re: Agreement and Plan of Merger
 
Dear Mr. Hawk:
 
     As you are aware, the September 21, 1998, letter to James Watt of Remington
Oil & Gas Corporation ('Remington') from H. Roger Schwall, Assistant Director of
the Corporation Finance Division of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
points out an ambiguity in the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the 'Merger
Agreement') dated June 22, 1998, between Remington and S-Sixteen Holding Company
('SSHC'). The ambiguity relates to Remington's ability to waive the condition,
set forth in Section 7.2(d) of the Merger Agreement, that Remington receive an
opinion from its special tax advisor, Arthur Andersen, LLP, that the transaction
contemplated by the Merger Agreement will constitute a tax-free reorganization
within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.
 
     As you recall, and as recounted in the draft Form S-4 under The
Transaction -- Background of the Transaction, the ability to structure the
merger transaction as a tax-free reorganization was an important factor in the
negotiation of the Merger Agreement. It is our clear understanding that the
Merger Agreement contemplates a tax-free reorganization and it will only go
forward on that basis.
 
     Therefore, we propose that the Merger Agreement be amended to clarify our
shared understanding as follows:
 
          Section 7.2(d) shall be amended by the insertion of the following
     language at the end of the current section:
 
             Notwithstanding the foregoing, the condition set forth in
        subsection 7.2(d) shall not be waivable by Remington.
 
     Please indicate your agreement with the proposed amendment by signing this
letter where set forth below and returning it to me.
 
     Thank you for your cooperation.
 
                                            Sincerely,
 
                                            REMINGTON OIL & GAS CORPORATION
 
                                            By        /s/ JAMES WATT
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                 James Watt, Chief Executive
                                                            Officer
 
Accepted and Agreed to:
 
S-SIXTEEN HOLDING COMPANY
 
By        /s/ DAVID H. HAWK
    --------------------------------
    David H. Hawk, President
EXHIBIT        23(b)

# CONSENT OF        INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by        reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-37576 and 333-37582) of        our report dated September 8, 2006, except for the first paragraph of Note 12 as to        which the date is September 26, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of        DRYCLEAN USA, Inc. appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the        fiscal year ended June 30, 2006.

/s/ Morrison, Brown,                Argiz & Farra, LLP 

Miami, Florida        September 26, 2007

49
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Yearly Report of Mentor Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K forthe year ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Adel Michael, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best ofmy knowledge:

 

(1)        The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)        The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

/S/ADEL MICHAEL

Adel Michael

Chief Financial Officer

June 25 ,2003
Exhibit (10)(a)

 

$1,000,000,000

AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT*

among

ALLTEL CORPORATION

and

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,

as Administrative Agent,

THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK,

CITIBANK, N.A.

and

KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

as Co-Syndication Agents,

and

VARIOUS LENDING INSTITUTIONS

BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES LLC,

as Sole Lead Arranger and Book Manager

Originally dated as of October 11, 1996

Amended as of December 30, 1997

Amended as of July 1, 1998

Amended and Restated as of June 28,2001
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4687 

To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require Medicare 

Advantage (MA) organizations to pay for critical access hospital services 

and rural health clinic services at a rate that is at least 101 percent 

of the payment rate otherwise applicable under the Medicare Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2004 

Mr. KIND (for himself and Mr. OSBORNE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act 

to require Medicare Advantage (MA) organizations to 

pay for critical access hospital services and rural health 

clinic services at a rate that is at least 101 percent 

of the payment rate otherwise applicable under the Medicare Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4687 IH 

1 SECTION 1. MINIMUM PAYMENT RATE BY MEDICARE AD2 VANTAGE ORGANIZATIONS FOR CRITICAL AC3 CESS HOSPITAL SERVICES AND RURAL 

4 HEALTH CLINIC SERVICES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1857(e) of the Social Se6 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–27(e)) is amended by adding 

7 at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(4) PAYMENTS FOR INPATIENT AND OUT9 PATIENT CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL SERVICES AND

10 RURAL HEALTH CLINIC SERVICES.—A contract 

11 under this section with an MA organization for the 

12 offering of an MA plan shall require the organiza13 tion to provide for a payment rate under the plan 

14 for inpatient and outpatient critical access hospital 

15 services and for rural health clinic services furnished 

16 to enrollees of the plan (whether or not the services 

17 are furnished pursuant to an agreement between 

18 such organization and a critical access hospital or a 

19 rural health clinic) that is not less than 101 percent 

20 of the applicable payment rate established for such 

21 services under part A or part B.’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply to Medicare Advantage contract 

24 years beginning on or after January 1, 2005. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Sean M. Cary, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc.

By:    /s/ Sean M. Cary
Name: Sean M. Cary
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 11, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41407 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus KERRIC DEWAUN OWENS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-560-1

-------------------- Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Kerric Dewaun Owens appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for transporting an undocumented alien within the United States by means of a motor vehicle for private financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324. Owens argues that his sentence violates the Sixth Amendment and United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), because the district court applied a sentencing enhancement under the Sentencing Guidelines for creating a substantial risk of death or serious bodilyNo. 04-41407 -2- injury. Because Owens did not raise a Booker challenge to his sentence in the district court, his argument is reviewed for plain error only. See United States v. Mares , 402 F.3d 511, 520-21 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517). Owens makes no showing, as required by Mares , that the district court would likely have sentenced him differently under the Booker advisory scheme. Similarly, there is no indication from the district court’s remarks at sentencing that the court would have reached a different conclusion. Thus, Owens has not met his burden to show that his substantial rights were affected, and he has not shown plain error. See Mares , 402 F.3d at 522;

see also United States v. Bringier , 405 F.3d 310, 318 n.4 (5th Cir. 2005).
AFFIRMED.
#### Veve Vereal EDWARDS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-6319.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 17, 2001.

Decided May 29, 2001.

Veve Vereal Edwards, pro se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Veve Vereal Edwards seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 *&*Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *Edwards v. Angelone,*No. CA-00-619-3 (E.D.Va. Jan. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 8, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-11414 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARCOS CRUZ-BARDALES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:05-CR-48-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Marcos CruzBardales raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32 .1





Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Imagenetix, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William P. Spencer,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
      August 16, 2010
              s/WILLIAM P. SPENCERWilliam
      P. SpencerChief
      Executive Officer and
President