71132 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 230 / Monday, December 1, 2014 / Notices 

Coalition Online Management and 

Evaluation Tool (COMET) and the 

Coalition Classification Tool (CCT), to 

gather information from DFC grantees. 

The COMET data collection system will 

be used for FY 2014 DFC grantees and 

SAMHSA CSAP’s Sober Truth on 

Preventing Underage Drinking 

Reauthorization Act (‘‘STOP Act’’) 

grantees. (STOP Act data collection is 

authorized and required by 42 U.S.C. 

290bb–35b and Section 519B of the 

Public Health Service Act). 

ONDCP will be awarding a contract 

for a DFC grant oversight system at the 

end of 2014, following a competitive 

request for proposals process. Currently, 

DFC grantees interact with multiple 

separate systems. ONDCP plans to have 

a newly improved grant oversight 

system with a data collection platform, 

which will replace the current COMET 

system. The development and 

implementation of the DFC grant system 

will strengthen ONDCP’s continued 

oversight of the DFC program. The data 

collected will have minimal substantive 

changes compared to what is currently 

collected and the system for data 

collection is intended to be more user 

friendly to reduce the burden on 

grantees. For FY 2015 and 2016 

grantees, ONDCP/DFC expects a similar 

data collection system to be fully 

functional for DFC data collection and 

STOP Act data collection. 

ONDCP’s Drug Free Communities 

office will continue to utilize the case 

study protocols previously approved by 

OMB to document coalition practices, 

successes and challenges. 

Approximately nine DFC grantees are 

selected each year to highlight in the 

case studies. The information from the 

case studies will be used to illustrate 

not only what works to reduce drug use 

in a community setting, but also how 

and why it works. 

Type of Information Collection: Webbased data collection, surveys and 

interviews of DFC and Sober Truth on 

Preventing Underage Drinking (STOP) 

Act grantees. 

Title: Drug-Free Communities (DFC) 

Support Program National Evaluation. 

Frequency: Semi-annually by DFC 

and STOP Act Program Directors via 

COMET, and annually for DFC Program 

Directors and selected coalition 

members via the CCT. Case study 

interviews and electronic surveys of 

Program Directors and electronic 

surveys of selected coalition members 

will be accomplished one time. ONDCP 

plans to award a contract for the new 

data collection system at the end of 

2014. For FY 2015 and 2016 grantees, 

ONDCP/DFC expects a similar data 

collection system to be fully functional 

for DFC data collection and STOP Act 

data collection. 

Affected Public: DFC and STOP Act 

grantees. 

Estimated Burden: ONDCP expects 

that the time required to complete each 

semi-annual report via COMET will be 

approximately five hours, and each CCT 

report will take approximately one hour 

to complete. Face to face interviews will 

take 1.5–2 hours and surveys will take 

approximately .25 hours each to 

complete. The estimated total amount of 

time required by all respondents over 

one year, including Program Directors 

and grantees to complete COMET, CCT, 

surveys, and interviews, is 9,680 hours. 

ONDCP estimates that DFC grantees will 

spend approximately the same amount 

or less when using the new DFC data 

collection system. 

Goals: ONDCP intends to use the data 

of the DFC National Evaluation to assess 

the DFC Program’s effectiveness in 

preventing and reducing youth 

substance use. Two primary objectives 

of the evaluation are to: (1) Regularly 

monitor, measure and analyze data in 

order to report on the progress of the 

DFC program and its grantees on 

program goals, and (2) providing 

technical assistance support to DFC 

grantees in effectively collecting and 

submitting data and in understanding 

the role of data in driving local coalition 

efforts. 

Comment Request: ONDCP especially 

invites comments on: Whether the 

proposed data are proper for the 

functions of the agency; whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

the accuracy of ONDCP’s estimate of the 

burden of the proposed collection of 

information, including the validity of 

the methodology and assumptions; ways 

to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and, ways to ease the burden 

on proposed respondents, including the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. Comments will be accepted 

for sixty days. 

Dated: November 25, 2014. 

Daniel S. Rader, 

Deputy General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28273 Filed 11–28–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3280–F5–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. NRC–2014–0188] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Submission for the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

Review; Comment Request 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of 

information collection and solicitation 

of public comment. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) has recently 

submitted to OMB for review the 

following proposal for the collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. Chapter 35). The NRC hereby 

informs potential respondents that an 

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and 

that a person is not required to respond 

to, a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. The NRC published a Federal 

Register notice with a 60-day comment 

period on this information collection on 

August 12, 2014. 

1. Type of submission, new, revision, 

or extension: Revision. 

2. The title of the information 

collection: Reports Concerning Possible 

Non-Routine Emergency Generic 

Problems. 

3. Current OMB approval number: 

3150–0012. 

4. The form number if applicable: 

N/A. 

5. How often the collection is 

required: On occasion. 

6. Who will be required or asked to 

report: Nuclear power reactor licensees, 

nonpower reactors, and materials 

applicants and licensees. 

7. An estimate of the number of 

annual responses: 231 

8. The estimated number of annual 

respondents: 231 

9. An estimate of the total number of 

hours needed annually to complete the 

requirement or request: 83,100 hours 

annually. 

10. Abstract: The NRC is requesting 

approval authority to collect 

information concerning possible 

nonroutine generic problems which 

would require prompt action from the 

NRC to preclude potential threats to 

public health and safety. During the 

conduct of normal program activities, 

the NRC becomes aware of an emergent 

event or issue that may be identified in 

its licensing, inspection, and 

enforcement programs. In addition, 

reportable occurrences, or unusual 

events, equipment failures, construction 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 230 / Monday, December 1, 2014 / Notices 71133 

problems, and issues discovered or 

raised during safety reviews are brought 

to the attention of the NRC through 

licensee reporting procedures and the 

safety review process. The emergent 

event or issue may present a situation in 

which the NRC does not have enough 

information to support regulatory 

decision making regarding an 

appropriate course of action to address 

the event or issue. 

If the NRC determines that an event 

or issue may have or has the potential 

for an immediate impact upon public 

health, safety, common defense, and/or 

the environment, the agency will 

prepare a bulletin or other form of 

generic communication that requires 

licensees and/or permit holders to 

respond within a specified period with 

information that would support agency 

evaluation and regulatory decision 

making. The bulletin may request 

licensees and permit holders to conduct 

evaluations, perform tests, and provide 

specified information within a 

prescribed time frame. 

The public may examine and have 

copied for a fee publicly-available 

documents, including the final 

supporting statement, at the NRC’s 

Public Document Room, Room O–1F21, 

One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The 

OMB clearance requests are available at 

the NRC’s Web site: http://www.nrc.gov/ 

public-involve/doc-comment/omb/. The 

document will be available on the 

NRC’s home page site for 60 days after 

the signature date of this notice. 

Comments and questions should be 

directed to the OMB reviewer listed 

below by December 31, 2014. Comments 

received after this date will be 

considered if it is practical to do so, but 

assurance of consideration cannot be 

given to comments received after this 

date. 

Vlad Dorjets, Desk Officer, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs 

(3150–0012), NEOB–10202, Office of 

Management and Budget, Washington, 

DC 20503. 

Comments can also be emailed to 

Vladik_Dorjets@omb.eop.gov or 

submitted by telephone at 202–395– 

7315. 

The NRC Clearance Officer is 

Tremaine Donnell, 301–415–6258. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day 

of November, 2014. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Tremaine Donnell, 

NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information 

Services. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28187 Filed 11–28–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. NRC–2014–0237] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of pending NRC action to 

submit an information collection 

request to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) and solicitation of public 

comment. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) invites public 

comment about our intention to request 

the OMB’s approval for renewal of an 

existing information collection that is 

summarized below. We are required to 

publish this notice in the Federal 

Register under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. Chapter 35). 

Information pertaining to the 

requirement to be submitted: 

1. The title of the information 

collection: 10 CFR part 62, Criteria and 

Procedures for Emergency Access to 

Non-Federal and Regional Low-Level 

Waste Disposal Facilities. 

2. Current OMB approval number: 

3150–0143. 

3. How often the collection is 

required: The collection would only be 

required upon application for a 

Commission emergency access 

determination when access to a nonFederal or regional Low-Level Waste 

Disposal facility is denied, which 

results in an immediate public health 

and safety and/or common defense and 

security concern. 

4. Who is required or asked to report: 

Generators of low-level radioactive 

waste, or the Governor of a State on 

behalf of any generator or generators 

located in his or her State who are 

denied access to a non-Federal or 

regional low-level radioactive wastes 

and who wish to request emergency 

access for disposal of non-Federal or 

regional Low-Level Waste Disposal 

facility pursuant to 10 CFR part 62. 

5. The number of annual respondents: 

1 (estimate). 

6. The number of hours needed 

annually to complete the requirement or 

request: 233 (estimate). 

7. Abstract: 10 CFR part 62 sets out 

the information which must be provided 

to the NRC by any low-level waste 

generator or Governor of a State on 

behalf of generators seeking emergency 

access to an operating low-level waste 

disposal facility. The information is 

required to allow the NRC to determine 

if denial of disposal constitutes a 

serious and immediate threat to public 

health and safety or common defense 

and security. 10 CFR part 62 also 

provides that the Commission may grant 

an exemption from the requirements in 

this Part upon application of an 

interested person or upon its own 

initiative. 

Submit, by January 30, 2015, 

comments that address the following 

questions: 

1. Is the proposed collection of 

information necessary for the NRC to 

properly perform its functions? Does the 

information have practical utility? 

2. Is the burden estimate accurate? 

3. Is there a way to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected? 

4. How can the burden of the 

information collection be minimized, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology? 

The public may examine and have 

copied for a fee publicly-available 

documents, including the draft 

supporting statement, at the NRC’s 

Public Document Room, Room O–1F21, 

One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The 

OMB clearance requests are available at 

the NRC’s Web site: http://www.nrc.gov/ 

public-involve/doc-comment/omb/. The 

document will be available on the 

NRC’s home page site for 60 days after 

the signature date of this notice. 

Comments submitted in writing or in 

electronic form will be made available 

for public inspection. Because your 

comments will not be edited to remove 

any identifying or contact information, 

the NRC cautions you against including 

any information in your submission that 

you do not want to be publicly 

disclosed. Comments submitted should 

reference Docket No. NRC–2014–0237. 

You may submit your comments by any 

of the following methods: Electronic 

comments go to http://

www.regulations.gov and search for 

Docket No. NRC–2014–0237. Mail 

comments to NRC Clearance Officer, 

Tremaine Donnell (T–5 F53), U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555–0001. 

Questions about the information 

collection requirements may be directed 

to the NRC Clearance Officer, Tremaine 

Donnell (T–5 F53), U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, 

DC 20555–0001, by telephone at 301– 

415–6258, or by email to 

INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRC.GOV. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day 

of November, 2014. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES