alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT        23(a)

# CONSENT OF        INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by        reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-37576 and 333-37582) of        our report dated August 28, 2007, except for the second paragraph of Note 12 as to which        the date is September 25, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of        DRYCLEAN USA, Inc. appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the        fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.

/s/ Berkovits & Company,        LLP

Fort Lauderdale, Florida        September 26, 2007

48
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4443 

To amend the National Historic Preservation Act to extend the authorization 

of appropriations for the historic preservation fund. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2004 

Mr. HEFLEY (for himself, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, and Mr. 

DUNCAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Historic Preservation Act to extend 

the authorization of appropriations for the historic preservation fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE HISTORIC PRESER4 VATION FUND. 

5 Section 108 of the National Historic Preservation Act 

6 (16 U.S.C. 470h) is amended by striking ‘‘2005’’ and in7 serting ‘‘2010’’. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28740]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express Negotiated Service 
Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Effective date: December 9, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 2, 2014, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail 
Express Contract 21 to Competitive Product List. Documents are 
available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2015-14, CP2015-17.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Requirements.
[FR Doc. 2014-28740 Filed 12-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
High Precision Cell Counting

Variables to consider transitioning 

from R&D to GMP to commercialization

Presented by: Matthew Riolo PhD
Conflict of Interest

I am the Lead Application Scientist for Chemometec Inc
Engineering T-cells

Cell count Cell count Cell count Cell count Cell count Cell count

• One of the most important steps in production and manufacturing

• Used throughout entire process

• Determine whether to move forward
• Cell Type: Immune cells, stem cells, CHO cells, HEK293T cells

• Culture Method: Culture flasks, bioreactors, media involved

• Process Development: Isolation, transfection, product formulation

Reagents involved - affects on cell health

• Expansion into Manufacturing: Multiple instrumentation, standardize protocol, ensure consistency 

• Storage: Cryo-preservative reagents, affects on cell health and morphology

Upstream Considerations
Cell Type 

Limitations

• Aggregation

• Sample volume

Potential Issues

• Storage, transfection

• Debris

Cell Counting Approaches

• Total cell count vs Differential cell count

• Direct cell counting vs Indirect cell counting 
Choosing the right cell counting instrument

Consideration: Will this be going into GMP, commercialization? 

• 21CFRpart11 software, documentation

• Anticipate expansion, regulation and challenges

Complex Protocol vs Simple Protocol

A

x y

z B

B1 B2

B3 C
Why do different cell counters give different results

• Staining reagents

• Trypan Blue

• Acridine Orange

• DAPI

• Propidium Iodide

• Parameters that define a cell

• Brightfield image

• Size and sharpness

• Fluorescence 

• Size and intensity
How to address different results

• Low user variability

• Low instrument variability

• Linear titration curve

0

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

5,000,000

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Total Cells / ml 

Multiplication Factor

Dilution
IQ, OQ, PQ

Set up has been completed

Software has been installed

Instrument is ready to be used

Instrument is functioning the way it is intended to

Test reproducibility of instrument within a given range

IQ

OQ

PQ
Intended purpose

• Manufacture’s intended purpose

• User’s Intended purpose

• Make sure these Align

• Variables to consider

• Cell type

• Process development

• Media

• Goals
Lessons learned in the field

• Objective

• Clinical trials and commercialization

• R&D to optimize process development / manufacturing

• Communication

• Make sure everyone is on the same page

• Work with vendor upstream 

• Keep in contact

• Knowledge of regulations

• Project Manager

• Senior Scientist

Know what 

needs to be 

achieved to 

move forward

Test and 

optimize

Validate and 

implement 
Challenges in cell counting

New variables effect validated procedures

• New steps in process development

• Reagents

• Cryo-preservation

New Technology

• Better precision

• Better definition of what a true cell is

• How to make that change

Staying updated with regulations

• Keeping up with 21CFRpart11 

• Avoiding conflicts of interest
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-09-00420-CR

CHRISTOPHER D. WILLIS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006-1594-C2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to a plea bargain, Christopher Willis was placed on deferred 

adjudication community supervision for aggravated sexual assault of a child. About 

two years later, the State filed a motion to adjudicate. Willis pleaded true to the 

allegations, and the court adjudicated his guilt and sentenced him to twenty-five years’ 

imprisonment. Willis contends in his sole issue that the court erred by assessing his 

court-appointed attorney’s fees as part of the costs after finding him indigent less than a 

month earlier. We will modify the judgment and affirm the judgment as modified.
Willis v. State Page 2

Article 26.05(g) of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides:

If the court determines that a defendant has financial resources that 

enable him to offset in part or in whole the costs of the legal services 

provided, including any expenses and costs, the court shall order the 

defendant to pay during the pendency of the charges or, if convicted, as 

court costs the amount that it finds the defendant is able to pay.

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 26.05(g) (Vernon Supp. 2010).

If the State fails to present evidence that the defendant is able to pay all or part of 

his court-appointed attorney’s fees, then the trial court commits error by assessing any 

part of those fees as costs of court. See Mayer v. State, 274 S.W.3d 898, 901 (Tex. App.—

Amarillo 2008), aff’d, 309 S.W.3d 552 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).1 Here, no such evidence 

was presented.

The State concedes that the court erred by assessing the court-appointed 

attorney’s fees as costs. We sustain Willis’s sole issue.

We modify the judgment by reducing the amount of costs assessed against Willis 

from $1,735 to $885. We affirm the judgment as modified.

FELIPE REYNA

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Affirmed as modified

Opinion delivered and filed October 13, 2010

Do not publish

[CRPM]

 

1 Regarding the State’s burden of proof in this regard, the Court of Criminal Appeals noted in 

Mayer, “there is no indication that the state was precluded from presenting evidence and being heard on 

the issue of appellant’s financial resources and ability to pay for reimbursement of the court-appointedattorney fees.” Mayer v. State, 309 S.W.3d 552, 557 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4632

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. St. Albans, New York, as the ‘‘Archie Spigner al Service located at 19504 Linden Boulevard in

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4632

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 19504 Linden Boulevard in St. Albans, New

York, as the ‘‘Archie Spigner Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4632 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 19504 Linden Boulevard in St. Albans, New

4 York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Archie

5 Spigner Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Archie Spigner Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 13,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 8962]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Man Ray—Human Equations: A Journey from Mathematics to Shakespeare,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Phillips Collection, Washington, DC, from on or about February 7, 2015, until on or about May 10, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public                               ( print page 71815)                            Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including lists of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: November 24, 2014.

Kelly Keiderling,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2014-28455 Filed 12-2-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72218-72219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28549]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-423, OMB Control No.3235-0472]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA Services, Washington, DC 20549-
2736.

Extension:
    Rule 15c1-6.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of the 
existing collection of information provided for in Rule 15c1-

[[Page 72219]]

6 (17 CFR 240.15c1-6) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 
U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (Exchange Act).
    Rule 15c1-6 states that any broker-dealer trying to sell to or buy 
from a customer a security in a primary or secondary distribution in 
which the broker-dealer is participating or is otherwise financially 
interested must give the customer written notification of the broker-
dealer's participation or interest at or before completion of the 
transaction. The Commission estimates that 446 respondents collect 
information annually under Rule 15c1-6 and that each respondent would 
spend approximately 10 hours annually complying with the collection of 
information requirement (approximately 4,460 hours in aggregate).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it 
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    Background documentation for this information collection may be 
viewed at the following Web site: www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be 
directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503 or by sending an email to: 
[email protected]; and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Acting Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi 
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, or by sending an 
email to [email protected]. Comments must be submitted within 30 days 
of this notice.

    Dated: December 1, 2014.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-28549 Filed 12-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Siebert Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Muriel F. Siebert, in my capacity as Chair, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report
filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the report.

|                                              |  |                      
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|/s/ Muriel
 F. Siebert                        |  | Date: March
 31, 2010
|                                              |  |                      
|Muriel F.
 Siebert                            |  |                      
|Chair, Chief
 Executive Officer and President |  |                      

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by section 906, has been provided to Siebert Financial Corp. and will be
retained by Siebert Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
1

Competition 2011-NIST-MEP-STATE-PARTNERSHIPS

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s)

Federal Funding Opportunity 2011-NIST-MEP-STATE-PARTNERSHIPS Questions:

1. Please let us know if there is an incumbent and the current satisfaction or lack of 

satisfaction you have with the incumbent. The submission deadline and 

requirements suggests an intention to fund the incumbent. An honest response 

would help us determine if we should invest a serious effort to submit a competitive 

proposal that would be seriously considered by NIST MEP regardless of who the 

incumbent is and if competitive NIST MEP will not have problems changing the 

recipient regardless of whether there is an incumbent.

NIST MEP is offering this federal funding opportunity as a full and open competition to 

award a cooperative agreement in FY2011 with the option of renewal for up to five years 

total. In the past, NIST MEP has made several financial awards to provide state 

relations support services to the MEP program on a national basis. Currently, those

services are provided by SSTI, the State Science and Technology Institute.

2. Will current MEP Centers qualify to participate either as a primary applicant or 

consortia member?

NIST MEP Centers that meet the published eligibility criteria are eligible to participate 

either as a primary applicant or consortia member, refer to the Eligibility Section in the 

full Federal Funding Opportunity announcement, 2011-NIST-MEP-STATEPARTNERSHIPS, at http://nist.gov/mep/upload/2011-MEP-state-partnership-ffo-tofanout.pdf . Eligible applicants must be a U.S.-based not-for-profit institution or 

organization or an entity or agency of state or local government. For the purpose of this 

solicitation, state and local agencies and non-profit organizations including universities, 

community colleges, and independent nonprofit organizations, are eligible. Eligible 

applicants may be consortia of state and local agencies and/or non-profit institutions.

3. Has NIST MEP set any guidelines on overhead rates for state and local agencies that 

are partners in a consortium that applies for the grant funding?

NIST MEP follows the guidance on Indirect Costs found in the DoC Financial Assistance 

Standard Terms and Conditions dated March, 2008

(http://oam.eas.commerce.gov/docs/GRANTS/DOC%20STCsMAR08Rev.pdf). Please 

refer in particular to Section A. Financial Requirements, subsection .05 Indirect Costs.

The recipient, as stated in the policy, would be the entity that is awarded the cooperative 

agreement. In addition, please see Section J. Codes of Conduct and Subaward, 
2

Contract, and Subcontract Provisions, subsection .02, Applicability of Award Provisions 

to Subrecipients.
THE ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM

Penetrates
Earth Y PN es

Atmosphere?

Wavelength

(meters) Radio Microwave, Infrared Visible Ultraviolet X-ray Gamma Ray

103 102 10°5 5x 106 10°8 10°10 10°12

& tt « & &

Buildings Humans HoneyBee Pinpoint Protozoans Molecules Atoms Atomic Nuclei

Frequency
(Hz)

104 108 1012 1015 1016 1018 1020

Temperature
of bodies emitting
the wavelength

" 1K 100 K 10,000 K 10 Million K
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
                        RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, 
                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
                        SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeff T. Wilson, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended
December 31, 2009 of Microvision, Inc.; and

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.

Date: April 30, 2010



| |  | /s/JEFF T. WILSON
    Jeff T. Wilson
    Chief Financial Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Magnitude Information
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30,
2005 (the "Form 10-QSB"), I, Joerg H. Klaube, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge, that the Company's Form 10-QSB fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: October 26, 2005                 /s/ Joerg H. Klaube
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Joerg H. Klaube, Chief Financial Officer


                                                                              21