alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>
                                                                     Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         We, the undersigned directors of Questar Gas Company, hereby severally
constitute D. N. Rose and S. E. Parks, and each of them acting alone, our true
and lawful attorneys, with full power to them and each of them to sign for us,
and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Annual Report on Form
10-K for 2001 and any and all amendments to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission by Questar Gas Company, hereby ratifying and confirming our
signatures as they may be signed by the attorneys appointed herein to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for 2001 and any and all amendments to such Report.

         Witness our hands on the respective dates set forth below.

     SIGNATURE                                   TITLE             DATE

 /s/ R. D. Cash                          Chairman of the Board    2-9-02
--------------------------------------
R. D. Cash

 /s/ K. O. Rattie                            Vice Chairman        2-9-02
--------------------------------------
K. O. Rattie

 /s/ D. N. Rose                            President & Chief      2-9-02
--------------------------------           Executive Officer
D. N. Rose                                     Director

 /s/ W. Whitley Hawkins                        Director           2-9-02
---------------------------
W. Whitley Hawkins

 /s/ Robert E. Kadlec                          Director           2-9-02
-------------------------------
Robert E. Kadlec

 /s/ Dixie L. Leavitt                          Director           2-9-02
--------------------------------

Dixie L. Leavitt

 /s/ Gary G. Michael                           Director           2-9-02
----------------------------
Gary G. Michael

 /s/ Harris H. Simmons                         Director           2-9-02
---------------------------
Harris H. Simmons
Exhibit 10.1

                AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AND CONSULTING AGREEMENT
               DATED FEBRUARY 13, 2003 BETWEEN UNITED STATES STEEL
                         CORPORATION AND THOMAS J. USHER


     This Amendment to Employment and Consulting Agreement, dated November 29,
2005 (the "Amendment"), amends certain provisions of the Employment and
Consulting Agreement dated February 13, 2003 between United States Steel
Corporation and Thomas J. Usher (the "Agreement").  All capitalized terms not
defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings assigned to them in the
Agreement.

     The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

     1.   Mr. Usher shall retire from the Board of Directors of the Corporation
          effective January 31, 2006; and the Consulting Period shall begin on
          February 1, 2006 and end on April 30, 2009.

     2.   Mr. Usher shall continue to be paid, through April 30, 2007, the
          salary contemplated by the Agreement for the Chairmanship Period.

     3.   Beginning on May 1, 2007, and ending on April 30, 2009, Mr. Usher
          shall be paid the salary contemplated by the Agreement for the
          Consulting Period.

All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in effect.

     Agreed to and accepted this 29th day of November 2005.


     UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION

     By /s/ Charles R. Lee                   /s/ Thomas J. Usher
       --------------------------------      -------------------
       On behalf of the Compensation &         Thomas J. Usher
       Organization Committee of United
       States Steel Corporation
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40623 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
LEO PATRICK COLLINS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5:10

- CR

- 1

- 1

Before KING, DAVIS, and SMITH , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Leo Patrick Collins, federal prisoner # 15509

- 078, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to compel specific performance of the plea agreement. In his motion, he asked the district court to compel the Government to file a motion to reduce his s entence as provided in Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Government argues that

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 6, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40623 Document: 00512490278 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/06/2014No. 13

- 40623

Collins’s appeal should be dismissed because Collins failed to file a timely

n otice of appeal. C ollins’s notice of appeal was filed after the expirati on of the time for filing a timely notice of appeal and the time during which the district court could have extended the time for filing a notice of appeal. See F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i), (b)(4). Accordingly, we GRANT the Government’s motion for

summ ary dismissal and DISMISS Collins’s appeal as untimely filed. See Burnley v. City of San Antonio , 470 F.3d 189, 192 n.1 (5th Cir. 2006). The Government’s alternative motions for s ummary affirmance or for an extension of time to file an appellate brief ar e DENIED. Collin s ’s m otion for
leave to amend his reply brief is GRANTED ; his m otion s for a three

- point reduction for his substantial assistance a nd to place our decision under seal

are DENIED.

2 Case: 13-40623 Document: 00512490278 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/06/2014
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4485 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4485

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Methyl Salicylate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 2, 2004

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Methyl Salicylate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON METHYL SALICYLATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following:

``      9902.34.35       Methyl Salicylate  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 119-36-                                                   31/2007
                         8) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2918.23.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
August 28, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KIMBERLY MITCHELL, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00562-CV V.

SOCIAL SECURITY DEPARTMENT, MS. BARRIOS,

KERRIE MOONEY, and AISHA SEWELL, Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the order signed 

by the court below on February 9, 2012. Having considered the motion and found it 

meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Kimberly Mitchell.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boundless Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005
as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 (section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002), that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

The foregoing certification (i) is given to such officers' knowledge, based upon
such officers' investigation as such officers reasonably deem appropriate; and
(ii) is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 (section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.

Dated: March 6, 2006                  /s/ John D. Ryan
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      John D. Ryan
                                      Acting Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 6, 2006                  /s/ Joseph Gardner
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Joseph Gardner
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signatures
that  appear  in typed  form  within  the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been  provided to Boundless  Corporation
and will be retained by Boundless Corporation and furnished to the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                    24 of 24
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 46 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 46

   To require the Secretary of the Treasury to submit a study of tax 
                     depreciation recovery periods.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

 Mr. Collins introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of the Treasury to submit a study of tax 
                     depreciation recovery periods.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY OF DEPRECIATION RECOVERY PERIODS.

    The Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary's delegate shall 
conduct a study of the differences between the depreciation recovery 
periods used for computing taxable income or loss under the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 and for computing net income or loss for financial 
statement purposes. Such study shall include such recommendations as 
the Secretary may have for adjusting the recovery periods used for tax 
purposes to make them closer to the periods used for financial 
statement purposes. The report of such study shall be submitted to 
Congress not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Inmarsat Finance plc (the “Company”)for the annual period ended 31 December 2006 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Rick Medlock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Date: 27 April 2007
```
       [NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
                 United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit





No. 98-2208

                      RAMON TORRES-GONZALEZ,

                      Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                v.

                          UNITED STATES,

                       Defendant, Appellee.



           APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                 FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

        [Hon. Carmen Consuelo Cerezo, U.S. District Judge]



                              Before

                     Boudin, Circuit Judge,
                Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,
                   and Stahl, Circuit Judge.
                                
                                
                                
                                
     Ramon Torres-Gonzalez on brief pro se.
     Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Miguel A. Fernandez,
Assistant United States Attorney, and Jose Javier Santos Mimoso,
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.





June 28, 1999



                                
            Per Curiam.  The district court, adopting the
  recommendation of the magistrate-judge, dismissed this Bivens
  action on the ground that it was barred by the applicable
  statute of limitations.  On appeal, plaintiff attempts to
  revise his equitable-tolling argument--contending that he did
  not learn of the alleged improprieties surrounding his removal
  from Venezuela until February 1998 (rather than August 1996, as
  he alleged below).  This argument, having been advanced for the
  first time on appeal, has been waived.  See, e.g., Malave v.
  Carney Hosp., 170 F.3d 217, 222 (1st Cir. 1999).  It would fail
  in any event, particularly given that plaintiff voiced similar
  factual allegations as far back as November 1995 in connection
  with his request for habeas relief.  For these reasons, as well
  as those enumerated below, the judgment is summarily affirmed.
            Defendants, noting that service of process was never
  effected below, suggest that this court's jurisdiction is
  therefore lacking.  This argument overlooks the fact that the
  complaint here was screened, and the sua sponte dismissal
  entered, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. � 1915A.  This provision "does
  not require that process be served."  Carr v. Dvorin, 171 F.3d
  115, 116 (2d Cir. 1999) (per curiam).  Appellate jurisdiction
  is thus unaffected by the lack of service.
            The motions to strike are denied, the motion to
  clarify is allowed, and the judgment is summarily affirmed. 
  See Loc. R. 27.1.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4697 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4697

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a permanent 
      extension of the credit for producing electricity from wind.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2004

  Mr. McHugh introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a permanent 
      extension of the credit for producing electricity from wind.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR PRODUCING ELECTRICITY FROM 
              WIND.

    Section 45(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 
to wind facility) is amended by striking
``, and before January 1, 2004''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23(a)



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To the Shareholders of ALLTEL Corporation:

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the previously filed registration statements of ALLTEL Corporation
(Registration No's. 333-68243, 333-76485, 333-85395, 2-99523, 33-35343,
33-48476, 33-54175, 33-56291, 33-65199, 333-88907, 333-88923 and 333-90167)
of our report dated April 24, 2000, on our audit of the financial statements of
the ALLTEL Corporation Thrift Plan as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and for the
year ended December 31, 1999 and our report dated November 19, 1999, on our
audit of the 360 Retirement Savings Plan as of August 1, 1999 and
December 31, 1998 and for the period January 1, 1999 to August 1, 1999, which
reports are incorporated by reference in this Amendment No. 1 to the 1999
ALLTEL Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                                          /s/ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Little Rock, Arkansas,
April 28, 2000.





                                        3
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Mines Management, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Glenn M. Dobbs, President and Chief Executive Officer of Mines Management, Inc.,, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  March 5, 2004

/s/ Glenn M. Dobbs

Glenn M. Dobbs

President, Chief Executive Officer

And Principal Financial Officer
MAYTAG CORPORATION
                                 
                                 Exhibit 12

                        Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                                    <PAGE>


                              MAYTAG CORPORATION
                                 Exhibit 12
             Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
              (Amounts in thousands of dollars except ratios)


                                      Year Ended December 31
                         1997       1996        1995       1994       1993

Consolidated pretax
income from
continuing
operations before
minority interest,
extraordinary item
and cumulative
effect of accounting
changes               $ 300,555  $ 228,237   $  59,804  $ 241,337  $  89,870

Interest expense         58,995     43,006      52,087     74,077     75,364

Depreciation of
capitalized interest      2,530      1,553       1,695      1,772      1,546

Interest portion of
rental expense            6,989      6,448       8,789     10,722     10,480

Earnings              $ 369,069  $ 279,244   $ 122,375  $ 327,908  $ 177,260


Interest expense      $  58,995  $  43,006   $  52,087  $  74,077  $  75,364

Interest capitalized      4,191      8,905       2,534        547      1,484

Interest portion of
rental expense            6,989      6,448       8,789     10,722     10,480

Fixed charges         $  70,175  $  58,359   $  85,346  $  85,346  $  87,328


Ratio of earnings to
fixed charges              5.26       4.78        1.93       3.84       2.03

<PAGE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1

                    [FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P. LETTERHEAD]

July 1, 1998



LifeQuest Medical, Inc.
12961 Park Central, Suite 1300
San Antonio, Texas  78216

Gentlemen:

             We have acted as counsel for LifeQuest Medical, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the authorization of 698,000
shares (the "Shares") of Common Stock, $.001 par value ("Common Stock"), of the
Company, issued or to be issued pursuant to the Non-Qualified Stock Option
Agreements between the Company and each of Andy Ambro, Joe Amick, Brian Boxell,
William H. Bookwalter, Stephen Collins, Patrick Dowd, James Edgekoski, Bob
Fadem, K.C. Fadem, Chip Haddock, Jim Harmount, Dan Holland, Amy Karlstad,
Richard H. Klein, Edward Kraus, Robert Kraus, Mark Lovejoy, Scott McEwen,
Jannine Meszler, Tony Miles, Jim Miller, Steve Nederhoed, Jeff Rencher, Ed
Rogers, Tony Schwindt, Cindy Seltzer, Ken Watson, David Whichard, Jon Whichard
and Richard A. Woodfield (collectively, the "Plans").

             In connection therewith, we have examined, among other things, the
Plans, the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Company and the
corporate proceedings with respect to the issuance of the Shares and such other
corporate documents as we have deemed appropriate.

             Based on the foregoing, and having due regard for such legal
considerations as we have deemed relevant, we are of the opinion that the
Shares to be issued by the Company pursuant to the terms of the Plans have been
duly authorized by all requisite corporate action and, when issued in
accordance with the respective terms thereof, will be validly issued, fully
paid and nonassessable.

             We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to
the Registration Statement and to the use of our names in the Registration
Statement.

             The opinions expressed herein are limited exclusively to the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and the federal securities law
of the United States of America.
<PAGE>   2
July 1, 1998
Page 2


         The opinions expressed herein are for your sole benefit and may be
relied upon only by you.

                                        Very truly yours,


                                        /s/ Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
EXHIBIT 4.5


 


Retention award – Mr John E Hooper


 


The retention
award of Mr John E Hooper is incorporated by reference to National Australia
Bank Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Commission on January 20, 2005.
Exhibit 32.2

                            MICROPAC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                             CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Micropac  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  November 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Patrick Cefalu, CFO of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


 /s/ Patrick Cefalu
-----------------------------
Patrick Cefalu, CFO
(Principal Financial Officer)