alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### W. H. Sandford, etc., *v.*A. P. Sandford.

Partnership — Authority of Partner After Dissolution of Partnership.

After the .dissolution, of the partnership, one partner can not bind the other partners by execution, of a note for the partnership debts.

APPEAL FROM OWEN CIRCUIT COURT.

December 16, 1872.

*219
      *Drane, for appellants.*

*Craddock, Trabue, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The first paragraph of appellants’ answer was bad, and the demurrer thereto was properly sustained. It is not only alleged in the petition that the services charged for were rendered at the special instance and request of appellants, but that they agreed to pay for them. As to the truth of these charges it is impossible but that they should have had somte knowledge or information.

We are, however, of opinion that the instruction asked for by appellant W. H. Sandford should have' been given. After the dissolution of a partnership-, one partner can not bind the others by the execution of a note even for an existing partnership debt. *Merritt v. Polly,*16 B. Monroe 355. The admission of one partner is not evidence against the others as to a partnership transaction. *Daniel v. Nelson,*10 B. Monroe 318. In this case the court says further that it has frequently sanctioned the principle that the admission of a partner so made does not take a debt out of the statute of limitations as to the other members of the defunct firm, and cites the case found in 1 Peter 373; 3 John 536; 3 Minn. 191; *4*Minn. 215.

We are not referred to the cases in which this court has so- held, but as the principle is conservant with the reasons of the law denying the right or ability of one stranger to bind another without his authority -or consent, we are inclined still to approve it. For the error indicated the judgment must be reversed, and as it is a joint judgment, F. Sandford is entitled to the benefit of the reversal.

The cause is remanded for a new trial upon principles consistent with this opinion.
| (1)   | the      Quarterly Report of Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the      quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | information      contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the      financial condition and results of operations of Willamette Valley      Vineyards, Inc. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 14, 2009 |                         |
|-------------------------|------------------------------|
| By:                     |                    | /s/ James W. Bernau |   |   |
| Name:                   |  James W. Bernau        |   |   |
| Title:                  | Chief      Executive Officer |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         611,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,557,400
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,709,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,985,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          253,300
<BONDS>                                      2,970,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,761,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,985,300
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               884,600
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               637,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             139,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   107,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000064892
<NAME> FDS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                           <C>               <C>               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS             3-MOS            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAR-31-1998       MAR-31-1998       MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                APR-01-1997       JUL-01-1997       APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-27-1997       SEP-30-1997       MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                        25,293            21,303            7,837
<SECURITIES>                  10,112            12,252            10,704
<RECEIVABLES>                 41,144            38,169            37,140
<ALLOWANCES>                  (2,534)           (2,700)           2,285
<INVENTORY>                   40,017            40,021            35,158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              126,250           122,613           101,845
<PP&E>                        32,466            33,944            51,180
<DEPRECIATION>                4,866             4,459             21,863
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                179,717           177,093           149,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         33,487            28,095            31,710
<BONDS>                       0                 0                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0                 0                 0
<PREFERRED>                   0                 0                 0
<COMMON>                      2,481             2,491             2,486
<OTHER-SE>                    144,816           0                 114,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  179,717           177,093           149,618
<SALES>                       55,291            48,818            177,816
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              55,291            48,818            177,816
<CGS>                         18,275            20,519            60,266
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 43,693            44,515            127,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              70                106               329
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0                 0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            11                0                 1,092
<INCOME-PRETAX>               11,841            4,785             36,140
<INCOME-TAX>                  4,038             1,638             12,321
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           7,803             3,147             23,819
<DISCONTINUED>                0                 0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0                 0                 0
<CHANGES>                     0                 0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                  7,803             3,147             23,819
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 .31               .13               .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .30               .12               .91
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC.

Appellant,

v.

BRENDA ISELA LOPEZ DE

SANTIAGO, Individually and as

Representative of the ESTATE OF

EILEEN ARAMBULA LOPEZ,

Deceased, and PEDRO ARAMBULA

MERAZ

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 17

- 00119

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 6

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2016

- DCV1638)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee s

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5, o n the judgment and all

costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 2018.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClur e, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
<PAGE>
 
                                  Exhibit 10C
                                  -----------

================================================================================
[BANK OF AMERICA]                                       Amendment to Documents

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO
                            BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT


     This Amendment No. 7 (the "Amendment") dated as of November 19, 1996, is
between Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association (the "Bank") and
McFarland Energy, Inc. (the "Borrower").

                                   RECITALS
                                   --------

     A.  The Bank and the Borrower entered into a certain Business Loan 
Agreement dated as of April 20, 1994, as previously amended (the "Agreement").

     B.  The Bank and the Borrower desire to further amend the Agreement.

                                   AGREEMENT
                                   ---------

     1.  Definitions.  Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment 
         -----------
shall have the meaning given to them in the Agreement.

     2.  Amendments.  The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
         ----------

         2.1  In subparagraph 1.8(i) of the Agreement, the phrase, "which may
              not extend more than 90 days beyond the Facility No. 1 Expiration
              Date" is substituted for the phrase, "which may not extend beyond
              the expiration date of August 31, 1996."

     3.  Effect of Amendment.  Except as provided in this Amendment, all of the 
         -------------------
terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

          This Amendment is executed as of the date stated at the beginning of 
this Amendment.


Bank of America
National Trust and Savings Association            McFarland Energy, Inc.





x-------------------------------------           x --------------------------
By: Anita L. Dice, Vice President                 By: Ronald T. Yoshihara, 
                                                      Treasurer and Chief
                                                      Financial Officer








--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AmendL (10/92)                       -1-                            010348-10067
Exhibit 32


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Imagenetix, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), We, William P. Spencer, CEO, President and
director and Debra L. Spencer, Secretary/Treasurer and director of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Registrant.


Dated: 11/22/2004                     /s/William P. Spencer
      -----------                     ---------------------------
                                      William P. Spencer
                                      CEO, President and director



Dated: 11/22/2004                     /s/Debra L. Spencer
      -----------                     ---------------------------
                                      Debra L. Spencer
                                      Secretary/Treasurer and director
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, James W. Bernau, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Willamette Valley
Vineyards Inc.

Date: August 14, 2007
By:	 /s/ James W. Bernau
Name: James W. Bernau
Title:   Chief Executive and Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.2

                     AGREEMENT FOR EXTENSION OF EMPLOYMENT
                         AND NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT

         AGREEMENT FOR EXTENSION OF EMPLOYMENT AND NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT,
dated December 6, 2005, by and between Scott Rechler (the "Executive") and
Reckson Associates Realty Corp. (the "Employer").

         Reference is made to that certain (i) Amendment and Restatement of
Employment and Noncompetition Agreement (the "Employment Agreement"), dated as
of August 15, 2000, by and between the Executive and the Employer and (ii)
Agreement for Extension of Employment and Noncompetition Agreement (the
"Initial Extension Agreement"), dated September 27, 2005, by and between the
Executive and the Employer.

         WHEREAS, the Initial Extension Agreement extended the term of the
Employment Agreement in all respects through and including December 31, 2005;
and

         WHEREAS, the Executive and the Employer wish to further extend the
term of the Employment Agreement in all respects through and including
February 28, 2006.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Executive and the Employer hereby agree as
follows:

         1. The term of the Employment Agreement is extended through and
including February 28, 2006. The Employment Agreement shall terminate on March
1, 2006 unless extended for such period or periods, if any, as agreed to by
the Executive and the Employer.

         2. In accordance with the foregoing, all rights, duties and
obligations set forth under the Employment Agreement shall be in full force
and effect through and including February 28, 2006.



                           [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]



<PAGE>



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement for Extension of Employment and
Noncompetition Agreement is entered into as of the date first set forth above.

                               RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.



                               By:  /s/ Jason Barnett
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Jason Barnett
                                    Title: Executive Vice President and General
                                           Counsel



                               /s/ Scott Rechler
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Scott Rechler




                                      2
Version 1 / Date of Issue: 10.29.15 / Issuing Authority: Forensic Science Standards Board (FSSB)

OSAC Research Needs Assessment Form

Title of research need:

Keywords:

Submitting subcommittee(s): Date Approved:

(If SAC review identifies additional subcommittees, add them to the box above.)

Background information:

1. Description of research need:

2. Key bibliographic references relating to this research need:

3a. In what ways would the research results improve current laboratory capabilities?

Research is needed to determine when training aids are contaminated and how long it takes to 

dissipate the contamination odor from the pure odor training aid.

Ross J. Harper, José R. Almirall, Kenneth G. Furton, Identification of dominant odor chemicals emanating from 

explosives for use in developing optimal training aid combinations and mimics for canine detection, Volume 67, Issue 2, 

15 August 2005, Pages 313–327

Kenneth G. Furton, Lawrence J. Myers, The scientific foundation and efficacy of the use of canines as chemical detectors 

for explosives, Volume 54, Issue 3, 10 May 2001, Pages 487–500

Erica Lotspeich, Kelley Kitts, John Goodpaster, Headspace concentrations of explosive vapors in containers designed for 

canine testing and training: theory, experiment, and canine trials, Volume 220, Issues 1–3, 10 July 2012, Pages 130–134

Research would result in improved quality of canine training aids for all disciplines. 

Development of methods for monitoring levels of contamination of aids

Training aid, contamination, canine

Dogs and Sensors 08242016
Version 1 / Date of Issue: 10.29.15 / Issuing Authority: Forensic Science Standards Board (FSSB)

3b. In what ways would the research results improve understanding of the scientific basis for the 

subcommittee(s)?

3c. In what ways would the research results improve services to the criminal justice system?

4. Status assessment (I, II, III, or IV): 

This research need has been identified by one or more subcommittees of OSAC and is being provided as an 

informational resource to the community.

Major gap 

in current 

knowledge

Minor gap 

in current 

knowledge

No or limited

current research 

is being 

conducted

I III

Existing current 

research is being 

conducted

II IV

The research would improve understanding of the subcommittee to be used in drafting standards 

related to training and certification.

The standards will result in improved detector canine operational performance as a result of an 

expected increase in more effective and efficient canine training.

 I
Version 1 / Date of Issue: 10.29.15 / Issuing Authority: Forensic Science Standards Board (FSSB)

// Approval date:

(Approval is by majority vote of subcommittee. Once approved, forward to SAC.)

1. Does the SAC agree with the research need? Yes ⃝ No ⃝ 

2. Does the SAC agree with the status assessment? Yes ⃝ No ⃝

If no, what is the status assessment of the SAC:

Approval date:

(Approval is by majority vote of SAC. Once approved, forward to NIST for posting.)

08242016 Subcommittee

SAC
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32(b)

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      The undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of Jordan Industries,
Inc., an Illinois corporation (the "Registrant"), hereby certifies that the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended June 30,
2006, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section
78m(a)) and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.

Date: August 14, 2006

/s/ Norman R. Bates
-----------------------
Norman R. Bates
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President
and Assistant Secretary
Exhibit 10.2


    
      
        

      

    

    Exhibit
      10.2


    AMENDMENT
      TO THE

    BROWN
      SHOE COMPANY, INC.

    DEFERRED
      COMPENSATION PLAN 

    FOR
      NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

     

    


     

    WHEREAS,
      Brown Shoe Company, Inc. (“Company”) previously adopted the Brown Shoe Company,
      Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (“Plan”);
      and

     

    WHEREAS,
      the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan by action of the Board of
      Directors of the Company; and

     

    WHEREAS,
      the Company desires to terminate the interests of Richard Liddy and Jerry Ritter
      under the Plan effective December 31, 2005; and

     

    WHEREAS,
      in connection with such termination, the terminated portion of the interests
      in
      the Plan shall be distributed from the Plan no later than December 31,
      2005;

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE, Section IX.B of the Plan is amended by adding the following to the
      end thereof:

     

    “The
      Accounts of Richard Liddy and Jerry Ritter shall be terminated as of December
      31, 2005. Such terminated Accounts shall be distributed no later than December
      31, 2005, so that the entire Account balances as of December 31, 2005 are
      taxable to the distributees in 2005. For purposes of these distributions, the
      Accounts shall be valued as of December 1, 2005.”

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed
      this 1st day of December, 2005.

     

    BROWN
      SHOE COMPANY, INC.

     

    


     

    By
      __________________________________
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals.

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number: 

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

14-15-01070-CR 1822364-B✔

/s/Karen Bauer, 1201 Franklin, 8th Flr, Houston, TX - kbauer7990@att.net (713) 755-0076

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/29/2015 9:53:28 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk