alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd. at September  30, 1998,  and its  statement of
income  for the nine  months  then ended and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference  to the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd. for the nine months ended
September 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1,353,864
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  373,369
<ALLOWANCES>                                   341,604
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         22,145,930
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,472,247
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 29,656,542
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     28,665,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   29,656,542
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,224,663
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  507,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               12,854
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,233,652
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,233,652
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,233,652
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Due  to the  nature  of its  industry,  CNL  Income  Fund  VI,  Ltd. has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit (23)


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

        We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration
Statements of Mercantile Bankshares Corporation on Form S-3 (No. 33-44376) and
Forms S-8 (No. 33-44373, 33-44374 and 33-44375) of our report dated January 20,
1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Mercantile
Bankshares Corporation and Affiliates as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and for
the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                            PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Baltimore, Maryland
March 25, 1999
Exhibit
32.2





SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350




In
connection with the Annual Report of HuntMountain Resources Ltd. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Bryn Harman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.




/s/
      Bryn HarmanBryn
      Harman, CFAChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)




Date:
April 14, 2009
EXHIBIT 4.43


 


Deed of access, indemnity and
insurance – Mr Paul J Rizzo


 


The
Deed of access, indemnity and insurance of Mr Paul J Rizzo is incorporated by
reference to National Australia Bank Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Commission
on January 20, 2005
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, James W. Bernau,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of WillametteValley Vineyards, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc.

 
| Date: November 14, 2008 |
|-------------------------|
| By:                     |         /s/  James W. Bernau |   |
| Name:                   | James W. Bernau |   |
| Title:                  |       Chief  Executive Officer |   |
|                         |  |  |  |  |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Rose Frawert, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Mid-State
Raceway, Inc. and Subsidiary (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 10, 2004
/s/ Rose Frawert
Rose Frawert
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
#### George Hendrie v. August Kalthoff.

*Taxation of dogs.*

The exemption of train [tram] railways from ordinary local taxation, does not include exemption from liability to pay the tax on dogs.

The tax on dogs is not imposed as a charge on property By reason of its value to raise revenue for ordinary purposes, but is in the nature of a license imposed on those who keep animals requiring special police regulations, to prevent mischief, and to provide a special fund to repair losses from them depredations.

Error to Wayne.

Submitted April 19.

Decided April 25

Replevin. Defendant brings error.

Reversed.

*George H. Premtis*for appellant.

*John E. Bissell*for appellee

Campbell, J.

Hendrie replevied a horse which had been taken for taxes levied on the personal property of the Detroit City Railway Company, in the township of Hamtramck, and for taxes on dogs belonging to such company. The court below held that the company was by § 2182 of the Compiled Laws exempt from such taxation.

That section exempts the company from taxes other than the State specific tax on all the property of the company. This precludes the ordinary taxation on property as assessed. But in our opinion the tax on dogs cannot be properly regarded as a tax on property, within the meaning of this exemption. By the laws of 1877, p. 239, a tax is laid on dogs not by valué but specifically, of one dollar for male dogs and three dollars for female dogs. This tax is for the particular purpose of raising a fund to pay for depredations committed by dogs, any surplus being paid into the school fund. Laws 1881, p. 396. The enforcement of the tax is secured by heavy penalties on the officers who refuse to levy it. The validity of this charge was before us in *Van Horn*
      *307
      *v.*People, 46 Mich. 183, and we sustained the law as a police regulation. It is rather to be regarded as a license than a tax law, imposed on those who choose to keep animals that have always been regarded as requiring special regulation different from that applied to others.

The judgment must be reversed with costs and a new tria.1 granted.

Marston and Cooley, JJ. concurred.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Patricia G. Kriss, Chief Financial Officer of Entropin, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 12, 2003

By:      /s/ Patricia G. Kriss
         ---------------------
         Patricia G. Kriss
         Chief Financial Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Entropin, Inc. and will be
retained by Entropin, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WORLDCOM, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          93,119
<SECURITIES>                                       746
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,837,351
<ALLOWANCES>                                   222,862
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,182,838
<PP&E>                                       8,741,814
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,010,087
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,915,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,310,070
<BONDS>                                      8,331,536
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              123
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,290
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,812,046
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,915,377
<SALES>                                      2,349,967
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,349,967
<CGS>                                        1,146,949
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,422,150
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (12,247)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                24,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             102,248
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (162,184)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   118,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (280,384)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (128,731)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (415,717)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.41)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000836809
<NAME> DIMENSIONAL VISIONS INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1,000
<CASH>                                          31,771
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  360,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (215,743)
<INVENTORY>                                    137,375
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               406,091
<PP&E>                                         358,065
<DEPRECIATION>                               (304,070)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 843,901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          891,689
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    713,410
<COMMON>                                         3,005
<OTHER-SE>                                   (764,203)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   843,901
<SALES>                                        380,777
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               380,777
<CGS>                                          236,879
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  236,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               767,572
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              76,451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (182,361)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (182,361)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-50849

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CESAR ARRNOLDO VALDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:03-CR-108-3

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cesar Arrnoldo 

Valdez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Valdez has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 16, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-50849 Document: 00514475177 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/16/2018
No. 17-50849

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-50849 Document: 00514475177 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/16/2018
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7587

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SAMUEL BENJAMIN KELLY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District

Judge. (2:98-cv-00569; 2:94-cr-00163-RBS-4)

Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: November 27, 2006

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Benjamin Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, Assistant

United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Benjamin Kelly seeks to appeal the district

court’s order treating his motion to reconsider the court’s denial

of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000);

Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)

(2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong

and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is

likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Kelly has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Kelly’s notice of appeal and

informal brief as an application to file a second or successive

motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Winestock, 340

F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to
- 3 -

file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims

based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously

unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on

collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously

discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to

establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for

constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the

movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255

(2000). Kelly’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria.

Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255

motion. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4359 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4359

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the child tax 
                                credit.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4359

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the child tax 
                                credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Credit Preservation and 
Expansion Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CHILD TAX CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 24 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to child tax credit) is amended to read 
as follows:
    ``(a) Allowance of Credit.--There shall be allowed as a credit 
against the tax imposed by this chapter for the taxable year with 
respect to each qualifying child of the taxpayer an amount equal to 
$1,000.''.
    (b) Increase in Phaseout Thresholds.--Paragraph (2) of section 
24(b) of such Code is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Threshold amount.--For purposes of paragraph (1), the 
        term `threshold amount' means $125,000 ($250,000 in the case of 
        a joint return).''.
    (c) Acceleration of Increase in Refundable Portion of Credit.--
Clause (i) of section 24(d)(1)(B) of such Code is amended by striking 
``(10 percent in the case of taxable years beginning before January 1, 
2005)''.
    (d) Combat Pay Taken Into Account.--Paragraph (1) of section 24(d) 
of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence: ``For purposes of subparagraph (B), any amount excluded from 
gross income by reason of section 112 shall be treated as earned income 
which is taken into account in computing taxable income for the taxable 
year.''.
    (e) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2003.

SEC. 3. REPEAL OF SUNSET.

    Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act 
of 2001 shall not apply to the provisions of, and amendments made by, 
sections 201 and 203 of such Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 20, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit
      23(a)**




ALLETE
      2007 Form 10-K











**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**








We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-3 (Nos. 333-02109, 333-41882, 333-57104, 333-147965) and Form S-8 (Nos.
      333-16445, 333-16463, 333-82901, 333-91348, 333-105225, 333-124455) of ALLETE,
      Inc. of our report dated February 11, 2008, relating to the consolidated
      financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of
      internal control over  financial reporting, which appears in this Form
      10-K.





PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLP





PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS
      LLP


Minneapolis,
      Minnesota


February
      15, 2008
Orange Cryostat Sample Sticks and Curves 

Sensor Length

50mm x74150

x43215

x45715

DT470

x99002

x46304

x116600

x116601

short

short

short

short

long

long

long

long

70mm x72969

x46302

x72813

x46297

x72797

DT470

x46300

x94595

x83129

x72787

x72795

x46298

x72939

x64564

x46301

x46239

short

short

short

short

short

short

short

short

short

short

short

long

long

long

short

short

100mm DT670A

x95024

Updated 3/15/18
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.7
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
 
     We hereby consent to the references to our firm under the captions
"Information about the Registrant -- Oil and Gas Properties", "Oil and Natural
Gas Properties" in Note 12 to the Financial Statements of Remington Oil and Gas
Corporation and "Experts", and to the use of the summary of our report setting
forth the oil and gas reserves of Remington Oil and Gas Corporation (the
"Company"), as of December 31, 1998, in its Form S-4, and all amendments thereto
and in the related Prospectus and Proxy Statement, as may be amended from time
to time, of the Company.
 
                                         NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
 
Dallas, Texas
August 13, 1998