alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Community Resilience Workshop - Data Needs for Resilience Planning and Decision-Making

21

Session 3: Community Resilience Priorities and Solutions

Josh Ghaffari, Washington, DC, Comprehensive Plan Manager

Josh Ghaffari is the Comprehensive Plan Program Manager at 

the District of Columbia Office of Planning (OP). Mr. Ghaffari 

is leading the update process for the Comprehensive Plan, 

which is DC’s 20-year framework that guides future growth and 

development. Mr. Ghaffari is developing resilience policy, 

which is being integrated into DC’s Comprehensive Plan for the 

first time. Mr. Ghaffari has worked in the Government of the 

District of Columbia since 2007 in various capacities. Mr. 

Ghaffari holds a Master of Arts Degree in Urban and Regional 

Planning from the University of Westminster in London, 

England and a Bachelor of Science Degree in Geography and 

Environmental Planning from Towson University in Towson, Maryland. Mr. Ghaffari is a 

member of the American Planning Association (APA) as well as the Urban Land Institute (ULI) 

and has certification as a Certified Public Manager (CPM) and as an Envision Sustainability 

Professional (ENV SP).

Abstract 

Resilience Planning in Washington, DC

The term resilience is a broad concept that has become a more deliberate and important aspect of 

community planning in recent years. The District of Columbia faces numerous resilience 

challenges and is home to over 700,000 residents with local neighborhoods as diverse as the 

people, cultures and systems found within them. It is the center of the regional economy and the 

hub for the metropolitan transportation system which together create unique social and financial 

vulnerabilities. The Office of Planning is currently updating the District’s Comprehensive Plan 

and resilience is being incorporated for the first time. A number of other District agencies are 

actively working to address resilience in their own specific plans, such as through a Resilience 

Strategy and Hazard Mitigation Plan. A primary objective of the new Comprehensive Plan focus 

on resilience is to leverage and build upon the District’s existing key strengths and initiatives 

related to resilience. In addition, to promote continued cross-agency collaboration on resilience 

policies and actions that result in coordinated strategies and equitable outcomes for the entire 

city.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000837913
<NAME> GENUS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           10961
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    16456
<ALLOWANCES>                                       250
<INVENTORY>                                      28584
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 61169
<PP&E>                                           40213
<DEPRECIATION>                                   23891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   89628
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            18065
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         97329
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     70140
<SALES>                                          65347
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 65347
<CGS>                                            43334
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    72252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6905)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6867)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.41)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1








SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350




I, A. Bruce O’Connor, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the periodic report being filed herewith containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that information contained in said periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Middlesex Water Company for the period covered by said periodic report.














/s/A. Bruce O’ConnorA. Bruce O’ConnorChief Financial Officer











Date:   March 15, 2011














A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Middlesex Water Company and will be retained by Middlesex Water Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 417 

AN ACT 

To revoke a Public Land Order with respect to certional Wildlife Refuge, California. tain lands erroneously included in the Cibola Namstockstill on PROD1PC61 with BILLS

mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with BILLS

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 417 

AN ACT 

To revoke a Public Land Order with respect to certain lands 

erroneously included in the Cibola National Wildlife Refuge, California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with BILLS

2 

•HR 417 EH 

1 SECTION 1. REVOCATION OF PUBLIC LAND ORDER WITH 

2 RESPECT TO LANDS ERRONEOUSLY IN3 CLUDED IN CIBOLA NATIONAL WILDLIFE 

4 REFUGE, CALIFORNIA. 

5 Public Land Order 3442, dated August 21, 1964, is 

6 revoked insofar as it applies to the following described 

7 lands: San Bernardino Meridian, T11S, R22E, sec. 6, all 

of lots 1, 16, and 17, and SE1⁄4 of SW1 8 ⁄4 in Imperial 

9 County, California, aggregating approximately 140.32 

10 acres. 

11 SEC. 2. RESURVEY AND NOTICE OF MODIFIED BOUND12 ARIES. 

13 The Secretary of the Interior shall, by not later than 

14 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act— 

15 (1) resurvey the boundaries of the Cibola Na16 tional Wildlife Refuge, as modified by the revocation 

17 under section 1; 

18 (2) publish notice of, and post conspicuous 

19 signs marking, the boundaries of the refuge deter20 mined in such resurvey; and 

mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with BILLS

3 

•HR 417 EH 

1 (3) prepare and publish a map showing the 

2 boundaries of the refuge. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 19, 

2003. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
```

   Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The undersigned hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge,  based
upon his review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
April 30, 2002, of Miller Industries, Inc. (the "Report"), that:

        (i)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
              material respects the financial condition and results of operations
              of the Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the
              Report.

                                                  /s/   Angelo Napolitano
                                                   --------------------------
                                                        Angelo Napolitano
                                                        President and Chief Financial Officer
Date:  January 10, 2003                                 (Principal Executive Officer)
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-50733

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHN LEON ROBINETTE,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-97-CA-138

USDC No. W-88-CR-130-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 12, 2000

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

John Leon Robinette was convicted of, inter alia, operating

a continuing criminal enterprise (CCE), in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 848(a). See United States v. Devine, 934 F.2d 1325 (5th Cir.

1991). He appeals the district court’s denial of relief pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on his claim that his sentence on the CCE

conviction should have been determined by the Sentencing

Guidelines, and counsel was ineffective at sentencing for not

objecting to the use of pre-guidelines law to arrive at a life

sentence for the CCE conviction. 
No. 98-50733

-2-

The issue underlying Robinette’s ineffective-assistance-ofcounsel claim, i.e., whether the CCE fell under the guidelines

for purposes of sentencing, was decided by this court on appeal

of the denial of Robinette’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion, in which

he made the same argument he makes now. This court concluded

that there was no basis for the district court to sentence

Robinette under the Sentencing Guidelines as he was already in

custody and incapable of further offense conduct when the

guidelines took effect. United States v. Robinette, No. 95-50290

(5th Cir. Nov. 15, 1995)(unpublished). Robinette does not

challenge this factual finding. It is therefore the law of this

case. See Free v. Abbott Lab., Inc., 164 F.3d 270, 272 (5th Cir.

1999). 

Because this court has determined that the guidelines were

inapplicable to Robinette’s CCE conviction, counsel’s failure to

raise this issue at sentencing did not constitute deficient

performance and did not prejudice Robinette. See Smith v.

Puckett, 907 F.2d 581, 585 n.6 (5th Cir. 1990). The denial of

§ 2255 relief on this claim is therefore AFFIRMED.
#### GUTMAN et al. v. LAWTON ESTATES, Inc. et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Sept. 20, 1951.

*952M. S. & I. S. Isaacs, New York City, for plaintiffs, Lewis M. Isaacs, Jr., New York City, of counsel.

Maurice R. Whitebook, New York City, for defendants.

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Tenants at 321 West 78th Street, New York City, bring this action jointly to recover triple damages for rent overcharges under Section 205 of the Housing Act of 1947, as amended, Title 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1895. Defendants move to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the Court is without jurisdiction since no single plaintiff’s claim exceeds $3,000, and the separate claims of individual plaintiffs may not be aggregated simply to confer jurisdiction on the Court.

I have no quarrel with the contention that distinct claims may not be fused for jurisdictional purposes. The rule is well established. Wheless v. City of St. Louis, 1901, 180 U.S. 379, 21 S.Ct. 402, 45 L.Ed. 583; Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc., 1939, 306 U.S. 583, 59 S.Ct. 744, 83 L.Ed. 1001.

The question remains whether this-Court has jurisdiction under Section 205 of the Housing Act to hear the matter despite the absence of a $3,000 minimum, claim. The issue has recurred in a number of Circuits since 1949. There is no authority as yet in this Circuit. Courts elsewhere follow either Fields v. Washington, 3 Cir., 1949, 173 F.2d 701, which holds to the $3,000 jurisdictional minimum, or Adler v. Northern Hotel Co., 7 Cir., 1949, 175 F.2d 619 granting jurisdiction over suits in any amount. Both positions have their judicial die-hards. Nothing this Court can add will realign the ranks. The reasoning of the Adler case, however, seems more compelling. A $3,000 jurisdictional minimum in suits oi this nature would practically disqualify the Federal Courts as a proper forum. Few tenants could claim that amount, even as triple damages, within the one-year limitation period of the Act. I cannot believe Congress intended, as a practical effect, to channel these suits almost exclusively into the State Courts.

Motion denied.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70136-70137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27716]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 232

[DOD-2013-OS-0133]
RIN 0790-AJ10


Limitations on Terms of Consumer Credit Extended to Service 
Members and Dependents

AGENCY: Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, 
Department of Defense.

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense has proposed an amendment to its 
regulation that implements the Military Lending Act. The proposed 
amendment was published on September 29, 2014, with comments due on 
November 28, 2014. This document extends the date for the receipt of 
comments until December 26, 2014.

[[Page 70137]]


DATES: The comment period for the proposed rule published on September 
29, 2014 (79 FR 58601), is extended. Comments must be submitted not 
later than December 26, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/or 
Regulatory Information Number (RIN) and title, by any of the following 
methods;
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    <bullet> Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark 
Center Drive, 2nd Floor, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-
3100.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number or RIN for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marcus Beauregard, 571-372-5357.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department is extending the comment 
period after receiving requests from several organizations. These 
organizations expressed that they would not have sufficient time to 
adequately cover their concerns. The Department believes this extension 
will allow the public the additional time they have requested to be 
able to review the proposal and provide feedback on the questions asked 
in the proposal.

    Dated: November 19, 2014.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2014-27716 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         187,580
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  101,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,166
<INVENTORY>                                    399,868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               708,563
<PP&E>                                         463,759
<DEPRECIATION>                                 391,614
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 788,374
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          378,087
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,230
<OTHER-SE>                                     356,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   788,374
<SALES>                                      1,844,782
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,844,782
<CGS>                                        1,123,575
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  820,288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 892
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (99,535)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (99,535)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (99,535)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.026)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.026)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,892
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,693<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,329<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                      5,993<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,789<F1>
<PP&E>                                         225,340<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 133,579<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 139,222<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,425<F1>
<BONDS>                                         49,907
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,814
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,530<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   139,222<F1>
<SALES>                                        105,619<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,619<F1>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   99,914<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,882
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,884)<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,561)<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,323)<F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,323)<F1>
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.49)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.49)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Restated to reflect the effect of certain required adjustments of income and
expense items, which resulted from a fourth quarter review of the Company's
operations and business.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Aquila, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference into the company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-88280 and 333-67822) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-92294, 333-68042,
333-68040, 333-68044, 333-67820, 333-66233, 033-45525, 033-50260, 033-52094, 333-19671, 333-91305, 333-94955, 333-30742, 333-29819 and 333-77703) of our report dated March 9, 2004, with respect
to the consolidated balance sheets of Aquila, Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity, comprehensive income, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, and all related financial statement schedules, which report appears in the December 31, 2003, Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Aquila, Inc.

Our
report refers to the change in the company's method of accounting for asset retirement obligations.

/s/
KPMG, LLP

Kansas
City, Missouri
March 9, 2004

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit (23a)





INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Met-Pro Corporation on Form S-8 Nos. 333-155981, 333-125664, 333-68220 and
333-44471 of our report dated March 15, 2010 with respect to our audit of the
consolidated financial statements and related consolidated financial statement
schedule of Met-Pro Corporation as of January 31, 2010 and for the year then
ended and our report dated March 15, 2010 with respect to our audit of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Met-Pro
Corporation as of January 31, 2010, which reports are included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Met-Pro Corporation for the year ended January 31,
2010.







/s/
      Marcum LLPBala
      Cynwyd, PennsylvaniaMarch
      15, 2010