alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.6


                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
                         CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
                             SUIZA FOODS CORPORATION

         Suiza Foods Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under the
Delaware General Corporation Law (the "Corporation"),

         DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: that the Board of Directors of the Corporation at a special
meeting of the Board of Directors called for such purpose, duly adopted
resolutions by unanimous vote setting forth a proposed amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be
advisable, and directing that said amendment be submitted to the stockholders of
said corporation for their consideration. The resolution setting forth the
proposed amendment is as follows:

                  RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Corporation
         hereby adopts, approves, and declares advisable a proposal to amend the
         Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, which proposed
         amendment would strike in its entirety paragraph (A) of Article IV of
         the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation and insert in its
         place a new paragraph (A) of Article IV, as follows:

         "The total number of shares of capital stock that the Corporation shall
         have the authority to issue is 501,000,000, consisting of (a) 1,000,000
         shares of Preferred Stock, $.01 par value per share, and (b)
         500,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value per share."

         SECOND: that thereafter, stockholders of said corporation, which hold
the necessary number of shares as required by statute, duly adopted and approved
said amendment at the annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company pursuant
to Section 222 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

         THIRD: that said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Directors of the Company has caused
this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by Gregg L. Engles, its Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer, as of May 14, 1998.

                                         SUIZA FOODS CORPORATION,
                                         a Delaware corporation


                                         By:     /s/ Gregg L. Engles
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                  Gregg L. Engles
                                                  Chairman of the Board and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:54
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 2 of 19 PageID #:55
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 3 of 19 PageID #:56
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 4 of 19 PageID #:57
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 5 of 19 PageID #:58
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 6 of 19 PageID #:59
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 7 of 19 PageID #:60
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 8 of 19 PageID #:61
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 9 of 19 PageID #:62
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 10 of 19 PageID #:63
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 11 of 19 PageID #:64
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 12 of 19 PageID #:65
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 13 of 19 PageID #:66
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 14 of 19 PageID #:67
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 15 of 19 PageID #:68
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 16 of 19 PageID #:69
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 17 of 19 PageID #:70
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 18 of 19 PageID #:71
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-2 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 19 of 19 PageID #:72
EXHIBIT 4.10


 


Variation to employment agreement – Ms Lynne M Peacock
(as Chief Executive Officer, Europe)


 


The employment
agreement of Ms Lynne M Peacock is incorporated by reference to National
Australia Bank Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Commission on January 20,
2005.
EXHIBIT 12-1


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

              MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                            (Thousands of Dollars)

                                               Twelve Months Ended   Twelve Months Ended    Twelve Months Ended
                                                December 31, 1995     December 31, 1994      December 31, 1993
                                               -------------------   -------------------    -------------------
<S>                                                  <C>                   <C>                   <C>     
EARNINGS AS DEFINED (1)
Net Income ............................              $ 71,723              $ 59,868              $ 62,376
Federal and other income taxes ........                41,004                29,839                30,939
Fixed charges .........................                45,637                39,663                36,231
                                                     --------              --------              --------
  Earnings as defined .................              $158,364              $129,370              $129,546
                                                     ========              ========              ========

FIXED CHARGES AS DEFINED (1)
Interest on long-term debt ............              $ 35,820              $ 27,948              $ 25,594
Interest on other borrowed funds ......                 7,053                 9,093                 7,961
Amortization of debt discounts, premium
  and expense .........................                   996                   950                 1,057
Interest implicit in rentals (2) ......                 1,768                 1,672                 1,619
                                                     --------              --------              --------
  Fixed charges as defined ............              $ 45,637              $ 39,663              $ 36,231
                                                     ========              ========              ========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges ....                  3.47                  3.26                  3.58
                                                     ========              ========              ========

<FN>
Notes:
(1)  Earnings and fixed charges are defined and computed in accordance with
     instructions for Item 3 of Form S-3.

(2)  This amount is estimated to be a reasonable approximation of the interest
     portion of rentals.

MichCon is a guarantor of certain other debt. Fixed charges related to such
debt are deemed to be immaterial and therefore have been excluded from the
above ratios.


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-209-CV

SHARLA STEPHENS CUMMINS	APPELLANT

	V.

WM SPECIALTY LLC	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM THE 48TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Sharla Stephens Cummins a/k/a Sharla Stephens Cummins Phillips is attempting to appeal a home equity foreclosure order.  An order granting a home equity foreclosure application is not appealable.2  Although appellant has responded to our jurisdictional inquiry, she has not stated a ground for continuing the appeal.  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.3	

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DELIVERED:   August 16, 2007
10812.

#### Dalton *v.*The State.

Decided November 4, 1919.

Accusation of iflisdemeanor; from city court of Macoa —Judge Guerry. July 1, 1919.

*Olin J. Wimberly, Thomas A. Jacobs, G. A. Cunningham,*for plaintiff in error.

*Will Gunn, solicitor,*contra.

Luke, J.

The defendant was charged with possessing intoxicating liquors in violation of law. The evidence authorized his conviction; and this being true (there being no error of law complained of), this court is powerless to set the conviction aside.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., eoneur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 433 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 433

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a minimum credit 
against the alternative minimum tax where stock acquired pursuant to an 
         incentive stock option is sold or exchanged at a loss.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2003

 Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself, Mr. Neal of Massachusetts, Mr. 
   Ramstad, Mr. Matsui, Mr. Crane, Mr. McInnis, and Mr. Tom Davis of 
  Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a minimum credit 
against the alternative minimum tax where stock acquired pursuant to an 
         incentive stock option is sold or exchanged at a loss.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MINIMUM CREDIT AGAINST THE ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX WHERE 
              STOCK ACQUIRED PURSUANT TO AN INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION IS 
              SOLD OR EXCHANGED AT A LOSS.

    (a) In General.--Section 53 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to credit for prior year minimum tax liability) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Special Rule in Case of Incentive Stock Options.--
            ``(1) In general.--The amount determined under subsection 
        (c) for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2002, 
        shall be not less than the lesser of--
                    ``(A) the incentive stock option tax, or
                    ``(B) the greater of $3,000 or 50 percent of the 
                regular tax for such taxable year.
            ``(2) Incentive stock option tax.--For purposes of this 
        subsection, the term `incentive stock option tax' means the 
        excess (if any) of--
                    ``(A) the aggregate tax imposed by section 55 by 
                reason of section 56(b)(3) for all prior taxable years 
                with respect to stock if--
                            ``(i) such stock is sold or exchanged 
                        during the taxable year or any prior taxable 
                        year, and
                            ``(ii) a loss is recognized on such sale or 
                        exchange for purposes of part VI, over
                    ``(B) the aggregate increase in the amount 
                determined under subsection (c) by reason of this 
                subsection for all prior taxable years.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
ILND 450 (Rev. 10/13) Judgment in a Civil Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

McDonald's Corporation et al,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

Austin Mutual Insurance Company,

Defendant(s).

Case No. 20 CV 5057

Judge John Robert Blakey 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Judgment is hereby entered (check appropriate box):

in favor of plaintiff(s)

and against defendant(s)

in the amount of $ ,

which includes pre–judgment interest. 

does not include pre–judgment interest.

Post-judgment interest accrues on that amount at the rate provided by law from the date of this judgment. 

Plaintiff(s) shall recover costs from defendant(s).

in favor of defendant(s) 

and against plaintiff(s)

.

Defendant(s) shall recover costs from plaintiff(s).

other: This case is dismissed with prejudice under Rule 41(a). 

This action was (check one):

tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. 

tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached. 

decided by Judge John Robert Blakey on a motion. 

Date: 6/24/2022 Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court

G. Lewis , Deputy Clerk

Case: 1:20-cv-05057 Document #: 99 Filed: 06/24/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1694
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENETS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,383
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,504
<INVENTORY>                                     22,824
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,434
<PP&E>                                          48,124
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 138,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,292
<BONDS>                                        106,083
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,614
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   138,891
<SALES>                                         61,312
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,312
<CGS>                                           41,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,497
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,298
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       118
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,328)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,328)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.62)
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Noel Castillo MABINI, Defendant— Appellant.

No. 00-10442.

D.C. No. CR-99-20137-RMW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2001.1

Decided May 30, 2001.

Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

Noel Castillo Mabini appeals his guilty plea conviction and 37-month sentence for possession of a firearm and ammunition by *574a prohibited person. Mabini contends that the felon-in-possession statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), is invalid because Congress lacked authority under the Commerce Clause to deem such possession criminal. This argument is foreclosed by *United States v. Davis,*242 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir.2001). Accordingly, the conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Order entered Ju ly 1 1 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 22
- 00113
- CR DAVION VAN QUINN SCOTT , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 265 t h Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 20
- 75064
- R

O RDER
Before the C o urt is appellant ’s Ju ly 8, 2022 motion for an extension of time
to file his brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant ’ s brief due by August 10 , 2022

.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Exhibit 99.1

[LOGO]

Aquila

March
20, 2001
20 West Ninth Street
Kansas City, MO 64105
816-421-6600

Securities
and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549

RE:    Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2001

Dear
Sir or Madam: Andersen has represented to us that the audit of Aquila, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001, was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and
auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on
audits, availability of national office consultation and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

Sincerely,

/s/
Dan Streek

Dan
Streek
Chief Financial Officer

---

QuickLinks
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

mntteb ~tate~ QCourt of ~eal~ 

for !be jfeberal QCtrcutt 

IN RE ABBOTT DIABETES CARE INC. 

2011-1516, -1517 

(Reexamination Nos. 901007,903, 901007,910) 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. 

ON MOTION 

ORDER 

Abbott Diabetes Care Inc moves without opposition to 

consolidate these two cases for briefing and oral argument. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT Is ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted. The revised official caption is 

reflected above. 
IN RE ABBOTT DIABETES 

OCT 012011 

Date 

cc: Gregory A. Castanias, Esq. 

Raymond T. Chen, Esq. 

s20 

FOR THE COURT 

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

2 

FILED 

u.s. COIIRT OF APPEALS FOR 

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

OCT 072011 

JANHORBALV 

ClERK
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,800,232
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               49,732,332
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,211,853
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            60,924,652
<PP&E>                                   1,166,721,622
<DEPRECIATION>                             223,971,003
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,016,321,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       75,660,979
<BONDS>                                    657,032,388
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,121
<OTHER-SE>                                 194,498,114
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,016,321,337
<SALES>                                    111,178,628
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           115,966,779
<CGS>                                       26,360,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               61,288,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            59,000,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          20,837,083
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (51,519,482)
<INCOME-TAX>                              (19,628,923)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (31,890,559)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (31,890,559)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.71)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906
of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Medtronic, Inc. for the fiscal year ended April 25,
2008, the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Medtronic, Inc., for purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and                       
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Medtronic, Inc.

Date: June 24, 2008

/s/ Gary L. Ellis  Gary L. EllisSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer


---