alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
November 23, 2005

Philip G. Trubey
15101 Red Hill Ave.
Tustin,  CA  92780

                  Re:      Amendment No. 4 to Promissory Note Dated
                           May 23, 2005, as amended on September 30, 2005,
                           October 6, 2005 and November 3, 2005.

Dear Mr. Trubey:

      Reference is hereby made to that certain Promissory Note (the "Note")
dated May 23, 2005, as amended on September 30, 2005, October 6, 2005 and
November 3, 2005 in the principal amount of $588,626.00 issued to you by
AccuPoll Holding Corp. (the "Company"). As consideration for an additional loan
from you to the Company in the amount of $300,000, the undersigned does hereby
agree to increase the principal amount of the Note in the amount of $888,626.

      Except as expressly amended hereby, all of the terms and provisions of the
Note is and shall remain in full force and effect. This amendment shall be
governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
California, without regard to principles of conflicts of law or the actual
domiciles of the parties.

      Please acknowledge your understanding of and agreement with the foregoing
by signing this letter agreement in the space provided below.

                                                              Sincerely,



                                          /s/ WILLIAM E. NIXON
                                          --------------------
                                          William E. Nixon
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer


Agreed and Accepted this
23rd day of November 2005


/s/ PHILIP G. TRUBEY
--------------------
Philip G. Trubey
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4451

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to correct 

the definition of certain non-knit gloves designed for use in sports. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2004

Mr. MCKEON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

States to correct the definition of certain non-knit gloves 

designed for use in sports.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN NON-KNIT GLOVES DESIGNED FOR 

4 USE IN SPORTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subheading 6216.00.46 of the 

6 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting ‘‘, and mechanics’ gloves’’ after ‘‘in8 cluding ski and snowmobile gloves, mittens and mitts’’. 

9 (b) HEADNOTE.—The Additional U.S. Notes to chap10 ter 62 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
2

•HR 4451 IH 

1 States are amended by adding at the end the following 

2 new note:

3 ‘‘3. For purposes of subheading 6216.00.46, the term 

4 ‘‘mechanics’ gloves’’ means gloves designed for use by 

5 professional autoracing teams and general automotive 

6 mechanics that consist of synthetic leather palms and 

7 fingers, fourchettes of either synthetic leather, nylon, 

8 or spandex, two-ply backs consisting of knitted span9 dex and tricot liners or three-ply backs consisting of 

10 knitted spandex, foam, and tricot liners, and elastic 

11 wrist straps with molded thermal plastic rubber hook 

12 and loop enclosures.’’.

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section apply to articles entered, or withdrawn from 

15 warehouse for consumption, on or after the date of enact16 ment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4673 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4673

    To require warning labels on consumer products containing radio 
       frequency identification devices, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2004

 Mr. Kleczka introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require warning labels on consumer products containing radio 
       frequency identification devices, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Opt Out of ID Chips Act''.

SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION DEVICE IN RETAIL 
              MERCHANDISE.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 6 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Federal Trade Commission shall promulgate a 
rule under section 18(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 
57a(a)) providing that it shall be an unfair or deceptive act or 
practice under section 5 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 45) to sell at retail 
any product containing a radio frequency identification device (RFID) 
unless--
            (1) such product bears a label meeting the requirements of 
        subsection (b); and
            (2) the person purchasing such product is provided with the 
        option of having such device removed from the product or 
        permanently disabled at the time of purchase.
    (b) Requirement for Warning Label.--The product label required by 
subsection (a) shall--
            (1) state, at a minimum, that the product contains a radio 
        frequency identification device, and that such device can be 
        used to track the product and transmit unique identification 
        information to an independent reader both before and after 
        purchase;
            (2) notify the consumer of such consumer's right to have 
        such device removed from the product or permanently disabled at 
        the time of purchase; and
            (3) be in a conspicuous type-size and location and in print 
        that contrasts with the background against which it appears.
    (c) Definition.--In this Act, the term ``radio frequency 
identification device'' (or ``RFID'') means a device that acts as a 
transponder and enables data to be transmitted through a radio signal 
to a receiver and that is placed in a product to provide 
identification, tracking, or other information about the product or the 
consumer of the product.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KAREEM EVANS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 888 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of April, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### Morgan County Court *v.*Turner & Brother.

Appeal — Transen pt — Presumption.

Without a complete transcript of a case, the Court of Appeals can not review it, but mupt presume that it was correctly decided. '

APPEAL PROM MORGAN CIRCUIT COURT.

March 9, 1874.

*568
      *John T. Hazelrigg, for appellant.*

*Rodman, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

It is recited in the judgment that this, cause was heard “on the pleadings, and exhibits and evidence.” In looking into the record it is found to contain the pleadings and exhibits, but no evidence is incorporated in it, either by way of depositions or by bill of exceptions. We are, therefore, constrained to conclude that the case is not presented to this court as it was to the circuit judge; and without a full transcript and an entire history of the case as it was made out in the court below, this court cannot adjudge that that court erred in its determination; but must presume that the case was correctly decided.

Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MILIAM MARGARITA BORJAS

BORJAS,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General , in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; COREY PRICE, in his official capacity as Interim Phoenix Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Hom eland Security,

Respondents

- Appellees. No. 20

- 16957

D.C. No. 4:20

- cv

- 00417

- RM

- LCK

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2021 * *

Before: GRABER, R. NELSON, and HUNSAKER, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 16957

Miliam Margarita Borjas

- Borjas appeals the district court’s order dismissing

her petition for a writ of habeas corpus and complaint for injunctive and

declaratory relief. Because the appeal has become moot, we dismiss it for lack of

jurisdiction. See Gator.com Corp. v. L.L. Bean, Inc. , 398 F.3d 1125, 1128

- 29 (9th

Cir. 2005) (en banc).

Borjas

- Borjas’s contentions raised in this appeal all challenge the prospect

of her removal prior to the adjudication of a motion to reopen filed with the Board

of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) on February 4, 2020. On February 3, 2021, the

court issued an order notifying Borjas

- Borjas that publicly available information

indicated the BIA denied the motion to reopen on December 8, 2020, and required

Borjas

- Borjas to explain why this appeal should not be dismissed as moot . Borjas

Borjas’s response to the court’s order (Dock et Entry No. 16) informed the court

that she has not filed an appeal or p etition for r eview of the BIA’s denial of her

m otion to r eopen . Because the BIA has adjudicated the motion to reopen, Borjas

Borjas’s appeal is moot. Accordingly, we dismiss for lac k of jurisdiction. See

Public Utilities Comm’n v. F ERC , 100 F.3d 1451, 1458 (9th Cir. 1996) (case no

longer presenting a live controversy is moot and must be dismissed for lack of

jurisdiction).3 20

- 16957

Borjas

- Borjas’s request for oral argument, raised in her opening brief, is

denied as moot.

DISMISSED.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40189 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CARLOS ESTRELLA-CAMBRANIS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-680-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER Curiam: * Carlos Estrella-Cambranis appeals his guilty-plea conviction of illegal reentry and his sentence of 18 months of imprisonment and three years of unsupervised release. Estrella-Cambranis challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). Estrella-Cambranis’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Estrella-Cambranis contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. NewNo. 06-40189 -2- Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000) , we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Estrella-Cambranis properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
   
We consent to the inclusion in Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 333-49389) and related Prospectus of Cooperative Computing,
Inc. of our report dated October 23, 1996 on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of Triad Systems Corporation as of and for the years ended
September 30, 1995 and 1996. We also consent to the reference to our firm under
the Caption "Experts".
    



                                               /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
   
August 4, 1998
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4589

AN ACT

To reauthorize the Temporary Assistance for Needy

30, 2004, and for other purposes.Families block grant program through September

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4589

AN ACT

To reauthorize the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families

block grant program through September 30, 2004, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4589 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TANF and Related

3 Programs Continuation Act of 2004’’.

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR

5 NEEDY FAMILIES BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM

6 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2004.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Activities authorized by part A of

8 title IV of the Social Security Act, and by sections 510,

9 1108(b), and 1925 of such Act, shall continue through

10 September 30, 2004, in the manner authorized for fiscal

11 year 2002, notwithstanding section 1902(e)(1)(A) of such

12 Act, and out of any money in the Treasury of the United

13 States not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby appro14 priated such sums as may be necessary for such purpose.

15 Grants and payments may be made pursuant to this au16 thority through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004 at

17 the level provided for such activities through the fourth

18 quarter of fiscal year 2002.

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

20 403(a)(3)(H)(ii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

21 603(a)(3)(H)(ii)) is amended by striking ‘‘June 30’’ and

22 inserting ‘‘September 30’’.
3

•HR 4589 EH

1 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL RANDOM SAMPLE

2 STUDY OF CHILD WELFARE AND CHILD WEL3 FARE WAIVER AUTHORITY THROUGH SEP4 TEMBER 30, 2004.

5 Activities authorized by sections 429A and 1130(a)

6 of the Social Security Act shall continue through Sep7 tember 30, 2004, in the manner authorized for fiscal year

8 2002, and out of any money in the Treasury of the United

9 States not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby appro10 priated such sums as may be necessary for such purpose.

11 Grants and payments may be made pursuant to this au12 thority through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004 at

13 the level provided for such activities through the fourth

14 quarter of fiscal year 2002.

Passed the House of Representatives June 22, 2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4713 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4713

                For the relief of Christine L. Barrott.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2004

Mr. Miller of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Christine L. Barrott.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The limitations set forth in sections 6511 and 
6514(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitations 
on credit or refund and credits or refunds after period of limitation) 
shall not apply to a claim filed by Christine L. Barrott of Milton, 
Florida, for credit or refund of overpayments of the individual Federal 
income tax Christine L. Barrott paid for the taxable years 1990 through 
1998.
    (b) Deadline.--Subsection (a) shall apply only if Christine L. 
Barrott submits a claim pursuant to such subsection within the 1-year 
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL
POSITION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          14,353
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  210,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,015
<INVENTORY>                                     40,201
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               453,162
<PP&E>                                       2,790,352
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,322,392
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,136,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          569,687
<BONDS>                                        617,107
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,300
<OTHER-SE>                                     605,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,136,336
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,253,679
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,079,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,346
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                20,868
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,190
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                124,685
<INCOME-TAX>                                    45,665
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             70,020
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    79,020
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Morgans Foods, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
Rule 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
   Date: June 2, 2008
    /s/ Kenneth L. HignettKenneth L. HignettSenior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer 47
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         375,222
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  765,154
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    171,529
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,411,915
<PP&E>                                       9,444,043
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,398,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,636,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,972,313
<BONDS>                                      3,111,049
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,327,186
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,712,921)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,636,265
<SALES>                                     13,093,969
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,093,969
<CGS>                                        1,404,649
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,268,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,253,238
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             295,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (419,725)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (419,725)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (419,725)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.4)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.4)
        

</TABLE>
#### Mitchell Clay *v.*L. B. Lesley.

Trespass — Title in Plaintiff.

In order to mantain an action in trespass,, plaintiff must show-possession or title dn himself.

APPEAL PROM PIKE CIRCUIT COURT.

September 17, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

Appellant utterly failed to prove that he was in possession of the premises upon which he alleges the trespass was committed.

He also fails to show that he owned or held the legal title thereto, and in fact states that the title is in the heirs at law of his deceased *98brother and that he at most owned but' a ninth undivided interest. To maintain trespass it is necessary that the plaintiff shall show possession or title in himself.

*Brown & Browning, for appellant.*

*Auxier, Bowles, Connelly, for appellee.*

The court properly instructed the jury to find for appellees.

Judgment *affirmed.*