alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

** **

ANNUAL MASTER SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE

 

WELLS FARGO DEALER FLOORPLAN MASTER NOTETRUST

 

March 24, 2017

 

The undersigned, aduly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), as the master servicer (the “MasterServicer”), pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement dated as of July 11, 2014 (as may be furtheramended and supplemented from time to time, the “Agreement”), between Wells Fargo and Wells Fargo Dealer FloorplanMaster Note Trust (“Trust”), does hereby certify that:

 

1.       WellsFargo performed duties as Master Servicer from 12:01 a.m. (New York time) on March 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016.

 

2.       Areview of the activities of Master Servicer during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the “reporting period”),and of its performance under the Agreement, has been made under my supervision.

 

3.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the reporting period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has duly executed this certificate the date first above written.
10425.

#### Carson *et al.,*trustees, *v.*Ayers.

Decided October 9, 1919.

Certiorari; from Franklin superior court—Judge W. L. Hodges. February 11, 1919.

*W. A. Stevenson,*for plaintiff in error.

Bloodworth, J.

This is the first grant of a new trial, and, the verdict not being demanded by the evidence, under the provisions of section 6204 of the Civil Code of 1910 and the unbroken precedents of the Supreme Court and of this court, the judgment granting a new trial cannot be disturbed. <■

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       9,860,357
<SECURITIES>                                 3,750,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,331,090
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,886,294
<PP&E>                                      10,848,662
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,077,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,772,148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,812,363
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       15,982,903
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,003
<OTHER-SE>                                (63,109,524)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,772,148
<SALES>                                     18,824,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,824,897
<CGS>                                       10,273,730
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               51,461,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,624,965)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,600,799
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (42,910,301)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (42,910,301)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (53,200,159)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.51)
        

</TABLE>
#### John O. Henons, Adm’r, *v.*Louisville, Cincinnati & Lexington Railroad Co.

Railroads — Personal Injury — Recovery.

Where it is alleged that plaintiff’s deceased was not an employe of the defendant railroad company when he received the injuries complained of, recovery may he had under either section of the statute.

APPEAL PROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

March 11, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

This court, in the case of the L., L. & F. Railroad Company v. Case’s Admr., in an opinion delivered during the present term, adjudged that the plaintiff, in an action like this, when it was alleged that the injury resulted from the willful negligence of the company, was entitled to recover for ordinary neglect. It is alleged that the plaintiff’s intestate was not in the employ of the appellee at the time of the alleged injury, and therefore a recovery could have *576been had under either section of the statute when the facts authorized the finding. It is not proper that we should discuss the effect of the testimony, as the case must go back for further trial, being well satisfied that the facts should have gone to the jury. The judgment of the court below is, therefore, reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to award the appellant a new trial and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

*Mundy, for appellant.*

*P. F. Green, for appellee.*
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Loren L. McFarland, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Mentor Corporation(the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(1) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31,2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.Dated: May 30, 2007/s/LOREN L. MCFARLAND
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                             461
<SECURITIES>                                        17
<RECEIVABLES>                                      110
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         18
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   707
<PP&E>                                          23,164
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     766
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            30
<OTHER-SE>                                         118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       766
<SALES>                                             53
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    53
<CGS>                                               70
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       70
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (103)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (103)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (103)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.014)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned Directors and Officers
of Millipore Corporation (the "Corporation"), do hereby constitute and appoint
Francis J. Lunger, Kathleen Allen and Jeffrey Rudin and each of them
individually, their true and lawful attorneys and agents to execute on behalf of
the Corporation the Form 10-K Annual Report of the Corporation for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2001, and all such amendments or additional instruments
related thereto which such attorneys and agents may deem to be necessary and
desirable to enable the Corporation to comply with the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any regulations, orders, or
other requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
thereunder in connection with the preparation and filing of said documents,
including specifically, but without limitation of the foregoing, power and
authority to sign the names of each of such Directors and Officers on his
behalf, as such Director or Officer, as indicated below to the said Form 10-K
Annual Report or documents filed or to be filed as a part of or in connection
with such Form 10-K Annual Report; and each of the undersigned hereby ratifies
and confirms all that said attorneys and agents shall do or cause to be done by
virtue thereof.

SIGNATURE                          TITLE                          DATE
---------                          -----                          ----



/s/ C. William Zadel               Chairman and Director      February 14, 2002
-----------------------------
C. William Zadel

/s/ Daniel Bellus                  Director                   February 14, 2002
-----------------------------
Daniel Bellus

/s/ Robert C. Bishop               Director                   February 14, 2002
-----------------------------
Robert C. Bishop

/s/ Maureen A. Hendricks           Director                   February 14, 2002
-----------------------------
Maureen A. Hendricks

/s/ Mark Hoffman                   Director                   February 14, 2002
-----------------------------
Mark Hoffman


<PAGE>


Page 2
Power of Attorney

SIGNATURE                          TITLE                          DATE
---------                          -----                          ----



/s/ Richard J. Lane                Director                   February 14, 2002
-----------------------------
Richard J. Lane

/s/ Francis J. Lunger
-----------------------------      Director                   February 14, 2002
Francis J. Lunger


/s/ John F. Reno                   Director                   February 14, 2002
-----------------------------
John F. Reno

/s/ Edward M. Scolnick             Director                   February 14, 2002
-----------------------------
Edward M. Scolnick
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4579 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4579

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To modify the boundary of the Harry S Truman National Historic Site in 
             the State of Missouri, and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4579

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To modify the boundary of the Harry S Truman National Historic Site in 
             the State of Missouri, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This section may be cited as the ``Truman Farm Home Expansion 
Act''.

SEC. 2. HARRY S TRUMAN NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.

    The first section of Public Law 98-32 (16 U.S.C. 461 note) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
    ``(d) Acquisition of Additional Land.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may acquire, by donation, 
        purchase with donated or appropriated funds, transfer from 
        another Federal agency, or any other means, the land described 
        in paragraph (2) for inclusion in the Harry S Truman National 
        Historic Site.
            ``(2) Description of land.--The land referred to in 
        paragraph (1) consists of the approximately 5 acres of land 
        (including the structure located south of the Truman Farm Home 
        site), as generally depicted on the map entitled `Harry S 
        Truman National Historic Site Proposed Boundary', numbered 492/
        80,027, and dated April 17, 2003.
            ``(3) Boundary modification.--On acquisition of the land 
        under this subsection, the Secretary shall modify the boundary 
        of the Harry S Truman National Historic Site to reflect the 
        acquisition of the land.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 23



Consent of Independent Auditors



Shareowners and Board of Directors

Maytag Corporation



We consent to the
incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Number 333-103688, Registration Statement Number 333-103687, Registration Statement Number 333-103685, Registration Statement Number 333-103683, Registration Statement Number 333-101995,
Registration Statement Number 333-102002, Registration Statement Number 333-102001, Registration Statement Number 333-101998, Registration Statement Number 333-88186, Registration Statement Number 333-46752, and Registration Statement Number
333-36054 on Forms S-8; and Registration Statement Number 333-62980 on Form S-3 of Maytag Corporation and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated January 27, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Maytag
Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 3, 2004.



Ernst & Young LLPChicago, IllinoisFebruary 19, 2004
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(a)




                        CONSENT  OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements on Form S-3 of Williams Holdings of Delaware, Inc. and the related
prospectuses of our report dated April 3, 1998 with respect to the consolidated 
financial statements and schedule of Williams Holdings of Delaware, Inc.
included in its Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 18, 1998.
        

          Form S-3:  Registration No. 33-63495
                     Registration No. 333-20927
                     Registration No. 333-24683
                     Registration No. 333-35097



                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Tulsa, Oklahoma
May 18, 1998
#### Isaac Newton, etc., *v.*J. B. Kennedy.

Guaranty — Scope of Undertaking.

Where with knowledge that there had heen dealings between A. and B., and in anticipation of other expected dealings between them, C., by writing, covenanted with B. to pay or canse to be paid to him any indebtedness that might be incurred by A. to- B„, it is an undertaking on the part of C. to pay any debts which A. might create with B., regardless of the amount, and C. was not entitled to notice as in case of letters of credit.

APPEAL PROM McC-RACKEN CIRCUIT COURT.

September 23, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

Impliedly, at least admitting that there had been dealings between Newton and Kennedy, and in anticipation of others expected to transpire between them, appellants, in the writing sued on, covenanted in express terms with appellee, that they would well and truly pay or cause to be paid to him any indebtedness or liability that might have then been incurred by Newton to him, and would pay to appellee any and all liabilities that said Newton might thereafter incur to him. Indeed, it is an undertaking on the part of appellants to pay to appellee in broad terms any debts that New*114ton should create with him regardless of the amount. Trusting to the discretion of Newton alone as to the amount of liabilities he might place them under, manifesting thereby the utmost confidence in him, and imposing upon themselves the duty of looking to it that he did not abuse their confidence. It might be that if an indebtedness to appellee was created, greatly disproportioned to the means of Newton, the business -he was engaged in and the real objects contemplated by the parties, it would amount to a fraud and appellants would not be bound. But that does not appear to have occurred in this case. Nor do appellants allege the facts in their answer sufficient to raise that question.

*Williams,, for appellant.*

*Bullock, for appellee.*

The reasons for a notice of acceptance when letters of guaranty are given do not apply in this case. In transactions where letters of credit are given, the guarantor is never present, and he is presumed to be and, in fact, must be ignorant of whether the parties actually contract, and if. they do, whether the person addressed gave credit to the party recommended on the faith of the recommendation. Such notification is obviously necessary that he -may know whether he is bound or not, and that he may be put on his guard and be enabled to protect himself in any contingency.

While in this case the parties knew they were bound, and bound to'an unlimited extent, and knew that the credit was.given on the faith of their responsibility, notice was therefore unnecessary.

The question of fraud attempted to be raised by the pleadings were not made out and, perceiving no error in the judgment, the same must be *affirmed.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6208

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DWAYNE LAMONT SOLOMON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (1:02-cr-00348-JAB; 1:05-cv-01090)

Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 6, 2007

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwayne Lamont Solomon, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM.

Dwayne Lamont Solomon seeks to appeal the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. §

2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Solomon has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 15, 2014

No. 04-13-00815-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF ALVIDA MAE AGUILAR,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PC-2802

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED.

The appellant’s brief is due on March 13, 2014.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of January, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                          75,124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,605
<PP&E>                                       3,881,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                 353,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,684,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,960,365
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,515
<OTHER-SE>                                     714,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,684,691
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  882,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,227
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             116,528
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (991,564)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (991,564)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (991,564)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>