alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Licking River Lumber & Mining Company *v.*W. W. Cox, et al.

Process — Service on Corporation.

In an action against a corporation, tlie service of summons on persons without a showing that they had any connection with the corporation, is insufficient, since the return should show service by delivering a copy of the summons to the chief officer, superintendent or managing agent as provided by the Code.

*520Judgment — Voluntary Appearance of One Party.

The voluntary appearance of one of the parties' not served with summons, and who is not interested in the company whose rights are to be affected by the judgment sought, although giving the court jurisdiction, will not authorize a judgment at that term of court, without consent, so as to prejudice the rights of those who had been summoned out of the county in which the action was brought.

APPEAL FROM MORGAN CIRCUIT COURT.

February 20, 1874.

OpiNion by

Judge PeyoR:

The only judgment that could have been rendered in the case was to subject the steamboat to the payment of the mortgage debt. There is no allegation in the petition that the contract between the company and the. purchasers of the boat had been cancelled, or that the note had in any way been discharged. It is alleged that the appellants had used the boat for ten months, but there is no statement even that the company was to account for the use, or that the value of the use of the boat was to. be credited on the note. The parties, however, were not properly before the court. The company seems not to have been served with a summons. The return of the sheriff shows that it was served upon certain parties, naming them, without showing that they had any connection whatever with the real defendant, viz., The. Licking River Lumber & Mining Company. The return should show that it was', executed on the company, by delivering a copy of the summons to its chief officer, superintendent or managing agent, as provided by the Code.

The judgment was also premature, even if the summons had been properly served. None of the defendants had been served with process in the county where the action was instituted, and therefore were not required to answer. The voluntary appearance of one of the parties not served with a summons, and not interested in the company whose rights are .to be affected by the judgment, and entering an appearance by answer during the term at which the judgment was rendered, although giving the court jurisdiction, would not authorize a judgment at that term' of the court, without consent, so as to prejudice-the rights of those who had been summoned out of the county in which the action was brought.

The court, however, having jurisdiction of the case by the appearance of the company on this appeal, can now proceed to try *521the case so far as the rights of appellants are concerned. The parties, if desired, should be allowed to amend their pleadings. For the reasons indicated the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

*Carlisle & Foote,, for appellant.*

*Cooper & Hazelrigg, for appellees.*
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4510 

To require the Secretary of Defense to provide to Congress copies and 

descriptions of contracts and task orders in excess of $1,000,000 for 

work to be performed in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2004 

Ms. SCHAKOWSKY (for herself and Mr. WAXMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to provide to Congress 

copies and descriptions of contracts and task orders in 

excess of $1,000,000 for work to be performed in Iraq 

and Afghanistan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4510 IH 

1 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE TO CONGRESS 

2 COPIES AND DESCRIPTIONS OF CONTRACTS 

3 AND TASK ORDERS IN EXCESS OF $1,000,000 

4 FOR WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN IRAQ AND 

5 AFGHANISTAN. 

6 (a) MONTHLY REQUIREMENT AS TO NEW CON7 TRACTS AND TASK ORDERS.—Each month, the Secretary 

8 of Defense shall provide to the chairman and to the rank9 ing minority member of each of the committees of Con10 gress specified in subsection (c) a copy of, and a descrip11 tion of the work to be performed under, each new contract, 

12 and each new task order issued under an existing contract, 

13 in an amount greater than $1,000,000 entered into by the 

14 Department of Defense during the preceding month for 

15 work to be performed in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

16 (b) REQUIREMENT AS TO CONTRACTS AND TASK OR17 DERS BEFORE ENACTMENT.—Not later than 180 days 

18 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

19 of Defense shall provide to the chairman and to the rank20 ing minority member of each of the committees of Con21 gress specified in subsection (c) a copy of, and a descrip22 tion of the work performed or to be performed under, each 

23 contract, and each task order issued under an existing 

24 contract, in an amount greater than $1,000,000 entered 

25 into by the Department of Defense during the period be26 ginning October 1, 2001, and ending on the last day of 
3 

•HR 4510 IH 

1 the month during which this Act is enacted for work to 

2 be performed in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

3 (c) COMMITTEES.—The committees referred to in 

4 subsections (a) and (b) are the following: 

5 (1) The Committees on Armed Services, Gov6 ernment Reform, Appropriations, and International 

7 Relations of the House of Representatives. 

8 (2) The Committees on Armed Services, Gov9 ernmental Affairs, Appropriations, and Foreign Re10 lations of the Senate. 

Æ
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41018 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JESUS OMAR CASTILLO

- LUCIO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:14

- CR

- 904

- 1

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Omar Castillo

- Lucio has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castillo

- Lucio h a s not fil ed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 12, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41018 Document: 00513379690 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/12/2016No. 15

- 41018

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave t o withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-41018 Document: 00513379690 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/12/2016
Low Field Setup

≤ 0.1 Tesla

Rev. 11/18/19
Primary equipment: 8020 frame

Polarized Beam 

Guide Field

Shielded 

Solenoid

Displex

Low Field Frame
Setup Configuration

• Low Field Frame:

• Huber: 6 1⁄2” plates below top plate; 

• EM Coils requires in-house water cooling and 35A min. power supply

• Water cooling order: supply-> power supply in -> power supply out-> coils (the two 

in/out ports are interchangeable) -> return

• Power supply is controlled using adam2041 voltage supply. Maximum voltage of X 

produces Y% output of 65 W power supply and ≈.128 Tesla in center between coils

• Downstream guide located 17.8 cm from solenoid (standard config)

• 3He Shielded Solenoid:

• Solenoid cradle: 2 rows (1.1”) from downstream opt. bench edge

• Solenoid horizontal translation: motor #70

• Solenoid vertical translation: motor #67; Beam ht (ctr): 49.125” from floor

• Solenoid ~1/2” from 8020 frame (standard config, can change as needed)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory F. Kowal, Chief Executive Officer of Mera Pharmaceuticals, certify that (1) Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 3 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|Date:  March 11, 2009                   
|                                        
|/s/ GREGORY F. KOWAL                    
|Gregory F. Kowal
Chief Executive Officer
|



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, 

INC., 

Appellant

v.

ALCON INC., 

Appellee

______________________

2023-1477

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-

01053.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

February 22, 2023

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: February 22, 2023

Case: 23-1477 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 02/22/2023
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28117]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[Notice CPL-2014-03; Docket No. 2014-0002; Sequence 36]


GSA Labor-Management Relations Council Meeting

AGENCY: General Services Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The GSA Labor-Management Relations Council (GLMRC) previously 
announced in its November 14, 2014 Federal Register notice that it 
planned to hold a meeting Tuesday, December 2, 2014 and Wednesday, 
December 3, 2014. That meeting is being cancelled. A new notice will be 
posted in the Federal Register announcing the date and time when 
rescheduled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Temple L. Wilson, GLMRC Designated 
Federal Officer (DFO) at the General Services Administration, OHRM, 
1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20405; phone at 202-969-7110, or 
email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5d3a30312f3e1d3a2e3c733a322b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80e7edecf2e3c0e7f3e1aee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 24, 2014.
Temple L. Wilson,
GSA Labor-Management Relations Council, Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-28117 Filed 11-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 71500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28409]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8960]


International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) Meeting Notice

    Closed Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App Sec.  10(a)(2), the Department of State 
announces a meeting of the International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) 
to take place on January 15, 2015, at the Department of State, 
Washington, DC.
    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 
U.S.C. App Sec.  10(d), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), it has been determined 
that this Board meeting will be closed to the public because the Board 
will be reviewing and discussing matters properly classified in 
accordance with Executive Order 13526. The purpose of the ISAB is to 
provide the Department with a continuing source of independent advice 
on all aspects of arms control, disarmament, nonproliferation, 
political-military affairs, international security, and related aspects 
of public diplomacy. The agenda for this meeting will include 
classified discussions related to the Board's studies on current U.S. 
policy and issues regarding arms control, international security, 
nuclear proliferation, and diplomacy.
    For more information, contact Richard W. Hartman II, Executive 
Director of the International Security Advisory Board, U.S. Department 
of State, Washington, DC 20520, telephone: (202) 736-4290.

    Dated: November 13, 2014.
Richard W. Hartman, II,
Executive Director, International Security Advisory Board, U.S. 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-28409 Filed 12-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                        42844904
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 39272324
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    2079219
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              87712901
<PP&E>                                      1023727223
<DEPRECIATION>                               321535816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               801065101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         29509178
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          3217860
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   506418720
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 801056101
<SALES>                                      801065101
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             157551428
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              39396312
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              159038
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               66758536
<INCOME-TAX>                                  26703000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           40055536
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  40055536
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 16, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 16, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18I0176. THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA v. ONE SIXTY OVER NINETY, LLC.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: SU17CV1023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Special Topic: Small Business Innovative Immunology Research.                    

*Date:*                         December 18, 2014.                    

*Time:*                         3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Andrea Keane-Myers, BS, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4218, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-1221,                         *andrea.keane-myers@nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 3, 2014.

David Clary, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-28747 Filed 12-8-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
A Resolution to Adopt & Implement the Metric System in the United States

Whereas: the United States is the only developed nation that has yet to officially adopt the metric system; and

Whereas: foreign trade is hindered by nations that refuse to buy products made in the United States that aren’t 

built to metric specifications; and 

Whereas: accidents concerning measurement mistakes and differences can be avoided if the United States adopts 

a system common with the rest of the developed world; and

Whereas: the mathematical and scientific industries of the United States use the metric system, and increased 

dependency on technology is causing a divide between technological and private sectors; and

Whereas: nanotechnology is now one of the standards in these United States. Using the conventional language of 

science, students need to be able to describe the size of a nanometer and make size comparisons of 

Nano-sized objects with other small objects. To accomplish this a student must be familiar with atoms, 

molecules, and cells. Students also need to have knowledge of basic units of the metric system and it`s 

prefixes and poses the ability to manipulate exponential and scientific notation and 

Whereas: the metric system is easier to use than the customary system of measurement because of its simplicity 

and

Whereas: Children Learn Metric more readily: citing a study sponsored, the American Association for the 

Advancement of Science and

Whereas: attempts by other nations to switch to the metric system have ended successfully with little 

inconvenience to their citizens; and 

Whereas: time in the classroom could be saved if the teacher did not have to teach two distinct systems of 

measurements and

Whereas: the United States government has supported attempts to adopt the metric system since the Treaty of 

the Meter in 1875 but has yet to put sufficient resources into this cause;

Therefore, be it resolved by the National Association of Academies of Science (NAAS) on this Twenty-Second Day in 

the Year of our Lord Twenty –Twelve that: the United States make a long term commitment to officially 

convert government, private sectors, and education K – 12 to the metric system.

Respectfully Submitted,

Board of National Association of Academies of Science