alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w14



 






Exhibit 10.14



Mexico, D.F. November 18th, 2005



FRANCISCO
CUEVAS FELIU



By means of this letter we accept your voluntary resignation as Administration and Finance Director
of our Company, which position you have held since September 1 2005. On this date your work has
concluded as per your unilateral decision.



In consequence this company as well as any other of the group to which our company belongs,
including feeder industries, affiliated, shareholders, executives and legal representatives do not
hold any actions or any right against you. During the time you participated in any position in
legal and correct form, you received from the company the amount of money corresponding to the
liquidation legally appropriate. You performed honestly and correctly over the finance of the
company.




TFM, S.A. DE C.V.




LIC. VICTOR HUACUJA

Human Resources Director















 






Exhibit 10.14



Mexico, D.F. November 18th, 2005



TFM, S.A. DE C.V.




Dear Sirs:



For personal reasons, I wish to present my resignation to the position I have held in TFM, S.A. de
C.V. since September 1, 2005. I also wish to state that in terms of section I of article 53 of the
Federal Labor Law, during the time I worked for TFM I received the legal and contractual benefits
to which I was entitled and there is no debt pending to this date.



I am grateful for the opportunity TFM afforded me and during the time I worked for the company I
suffered neither risk nor any work accident. As of this moment I grant the company the release of
any obligation as legally appropriate and I covenant to safeguard in a confidential manner all the
information that the company afforded me for the development of my duties during said period.




JOSE
FRANCISCO CUEVAS FELIU
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4565

For the relief of Obain Attouoman. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2004

Mr. MARKEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Obain Attouoman.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR OBAIN 

4 ATTOUOMAN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Obain Attouoman shall be eligible for issuance of an 

8 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

9 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil10 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

11 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to 

12 lawful permanent resident. 
2

•HR 4565 IH 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Obain Attouoman 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have en4 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, 

5 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of 

6 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 

7 enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Obain Attouoman, the Secretary of State shall 

16 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur17 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im18 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 
3

•HR 4565 IH 

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Obain Attouoman shall 

2 not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 

3 privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 

4 Act.

Æ
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4417

AN ACT

To modify certain deadlines pertaining to machine-readable,

tamper-resistant entry and exit documents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4417 EH

1 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN DEADLINES FOR

2 MACHINE-READABLE, TAMPER-RESISTANT

3 ENTRY AND EXIT DOCUMENTS.

4 Section 303 of the Enhanced Border Security and

5 Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002 (8 U.S.C. 1732) is amend6 ed, in each of subsections (b)(2)(A), (c)(1), and (c)(2), by

7 striking ‘‘2004,’’ and inserting ‘‘2005,’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 14, 2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4417

AN ACT

To modify certain deadlines pertaining to machinements. readable, tamper-resistant entry and exit docu-
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00145-CR

JAMES DANIEL HARRIS APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 89TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

A jury found Appellant James Daniel Harris guilty of a drug offense

enhanced to a first degree felony and assessed his punishment at life in prison 

and a $10,000 fine. The trial court imposed the sentence accordingly on March 

25, 2011. On April 1, 2011, the trial court issued an order nunc pro tunc 

correcting the judgment to reflect the proper amount of jail-time credit Appellant 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

had earned pending trial. Appellant filed a motion for new trial on April 26, 2011, 

which was a day past the thirty-day deadline set by the rules of appellate 

procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 26. He also filed a notice of appeal on the same 

date. We sent a letter to Appellant advising him that we were concerned that we 

did not have jurisdiction over his appeal and asked him to respond with evidence 

that he had properly addressed, stamped, and mailed his notice of appeal to the 

proper trial court clerk on or before the due date. In his response, Appellant 

advised us that he set his timetable based upon the date the trial court issued its 

order nunc pro tunc and not from the date sentence was imposed. He also 

informed us that he intends to seek an out-of-time appeal if his calendaring of the 

appeal was in error.

2

A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to vest this court with jurisdiction. 

Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210. A notice of appeal is timely if it is filed within thirty 

days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after the 

day the trial court issues an appealable order. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Notice 

of appeal may also be timely if it is filed within ninety days after the day sentence 

is imposed or suspended and the defendant timely files a motion for new trial. 

Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2). A motion for new trial is timely if filed within thirty 

days after the date the trial court imposes or suspends sentence in open court. 

 

2We do not have authority to grant an out-of-time appeal. See Slaton v. 

State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (reasoning that if an appeal 

is not timely perfected, a court of appeals has no jurisdiction to address the 

merits of the appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss it).
3

Tex. R. App. P. 21.4(a). An order nunc pro tunc does not affect the timetable 

from which a defendant may appeal from a judgment of conviction. See Rodarte 

v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108, 109, n. 1 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993) (appellate deadlines

run from date sentence is imposed rather than date written judgment is entered).

Appellant’s notice of appeal and motion for new trial were both untimely 

filed. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 43.2(f); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: June 30, 2011
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boundless Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004,
as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002), that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

The foregoing certification (i) is given to such officers' knowledge, based upon
such officers' investigation as such officers reasonably deem appropriate; and
(ii) is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.

Dated: March 3, 2006                  /s/ John D. Ryan
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      John D. Ryan
                                      Acting Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 3, 2006                  /s/ Joseph Gardner
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Joseph Gardner
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signatures
that  appear  in typed  form  within  the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been  provided to Boundless  Corporation
and will be retained by Boundless Corporation and furnished to the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                    22 of 22
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Mines Management, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Glenn M. Dobbs, President and Chief Executive Officer of Mines Management, Inc.,, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  February 27, 2004

/s/ Glenn M. Dobbs

Glenn M. Dobbs

President, Chief Executive Officer

And Principal Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0435

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DONALD RAY CHERRY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 13, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 6 2022

06/06/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0435
#### Enock Smith *v.*Jabez Donley.

Interest — Use of Money Under.Order of Court.

Where by a consent order a party was permitted to withdraw money paid into court and use it, he must account for interest thereon.

APPEAL PROM MONTGOMERY OIROUIT COURT.

March 25, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

The only error prejudicial to appellant consists in the refusal of the court to allow him interest on the money from the date of the consent order, by which it was agreed that the appellee might withdraw it and use the same in any way he pleased, and that the legal effect of the tender should be the same as it would be if the money were to remain in court.

The only object of this consent order, or its effect, at least, was to preclude the appellant from denying the fact that any such ten*617der had been made. If the money had not been tendered in court, the appellee would have been liable for costs, and in addition could not have raised the legality of his tender in this court. Upon the refusal of the appellee to withdraw the money, it would have been placed in the hands of a receiver, either on the motion of the appellant, or by the court of its own motion, with directions to loan it out, and the money would have been regarded as in court and under its control. The appellee having consented to withdraw it, with permission to use it, must account for the interest, for if left with the court, interest would have been realized on the amount. The appellee must not only pay this interest, but must pay the costs of the litigation since the return of the case to the court below on the original appeal, as he has refused to pay or tender to the appellant the amount of -money to which he was entitled.

*Apperson & Reid, Turner & Cornells on, for appellant.*

*Simpson, for appellee.*

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to enter a judgment in conformity with this opinion.

Judge Peters not sitting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,367
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  736,804
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,654,248
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               143,239
<PP&E>                                       1,655,737
<DEPRECIATION>                               (466,475)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,770,796
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,249,927
<BONDS>                                        809,086
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           25,000
<PREFERRED>                                        168
<COMMON>                                        71,698
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,313,217
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,770,796
<SALES>                                      6,837,765
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,837,765
<CGS>                                        3,053,965
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,500,041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (298,536)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (157,111)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,382,311)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,382,311)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                735,612
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,382,311)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.024)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.024)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2015

s0420 

# Order

Clerk April 28, 2015

146030

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146030

COA: 303201

Lake CC: 86

- 002451

- FC

RICHARD ALLEN SIMMONS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of November 6, 2013, the application for leave to appeal the September

13, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decisions in

People v Carp (Docket No. 146478) and People v Eliason (Docket No. 147428). On

order of the Court, the cases having been decided on July 8, 2014, 496 Mich 440 (2014),

the application is again considered. I t appearing to this Court that the case of

Montgomery v Louisiana , cert gtd ___ US ___; ___ S Ct ___; ___ L Ed 2d ___ (2015), is

pending before the United States Supreme Court, and that the decision in that case may

resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the

application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision i n that case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,449
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,916
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,724
<INVENTORY>                                      5,872
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,103
<PP&E>                                         197,045<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 125,513<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,747<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,465
<BONDS>                                          4,773
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,814
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,832<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,747<F1>
<SALES>                                        101,347
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,347
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,431<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,765
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,223)<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,268)<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,955)<F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,955)<F1>
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.79)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.79)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>The financial statements for the quarter and six-month period ended March 31,
2000 have been restated to reflect the reversal of an asset impairment charge
related to the Company's transportation management software.
</FN>


</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4618 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

10 West Prospect Street in Nanuet, New York, as the ‘‘Anthony I. 

Lombardi Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2004 

Mr. ENGEL (for himself, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. NADLER, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. ACKERMAN, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. TOWNS, 

Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. SWEENEY, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. BISHOP of 

New York, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. 

OWENS, Mr. WALSH, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. REYNOLDS, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, 

Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. WEINER, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. MCHUGH, and Mr. QUINN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 10 West Prospect Street in Nanuet, New 

York, as the ‘‘Anthony I. Lombardi Memorial Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4618 IH 

1 SECTION 1. ANTHONY I. LOMBARDI MEMORIAL POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 10 West Prospect Street in 

5 Nanuet, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Anthony I. Lombardi Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the Anthony I. Lombardi 

11 Memorial Post Office Building. 

Æ
Exhibit (23)


		  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

	We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration 
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 33-44376) and Forms S-8 (No. 33-44373, 33-44374 
and 33-44375) of Mercantile Bankshares Corporation of our report dated 
January 22, 1997, on our audit of the consolidated financial statements of 
Mercantile Bankshares Corporation and Affiliates as of December 31, 1996, 
and 1995 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 
1996, 1995 and 1994, which report is included in this Form 10-K.


		COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Baltimore, Maryland
March 27, 1997