alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-02-0154 -CV IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L D JULY 2, 2002

______________________________ In re J.A.G, aCHILD

______________________________ FROM THE 320 th JUDICIAL DIST RICT FO R POTTER COU NTY; NO. 62386-D; HON. DON EMERSON, PRES IDING

_____________________________ Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN and REAVIS, J.J. Pending before t he court is the m otion by the Texas Departm ent of Protective and R egulatory

Services (TDP) to d ismiss the appe al of Leigh Goldsmith for w ant o f jurisdiction. The latter had attem pted to appe al from an order signed on January

4, 2002, terminating her

par ent al re latio nsh ip with J.A .G, a child. The notice of appeal was f iled on April 2, 2002. Since Septem ber 1, 2001, statute m andates that appeals fromde cisions t erminating the par ent / c hild r elat ions hip be treated as accelerated. T EX . F AM . C ODE A NN . §263.405(a) (Vernon Su pp. 200 2). Ap plica ble rule of procedure, therefore, req uire s an app ellan t tofile the notice of ap pea l w ithin 20 days after the j udgme nt or order is signed. T EX . R. A PP . P ROC . 26.1(b). More i mportantly, this time period is not ex tended by

timely filed m otions2

for new trial or other

post-judgm ent m otions or requests for findings of fact and conclusions of law. T EX . F AM . C ODE A NN . §263.405(c). Here , th e final order terminating the parental rights of Goldsm ith was signed on January 4, 2002. Thus, her notice of appeal w as due on or before January 25, 2002. However, it was not f

iled until April of 2002. Sinc e a ti me l y mo ti on to ext en d t hi s t i me period was not filed and beca use we lack the authority to m odify the dea dline s ap plica ble to perfecting an appeal, T EX . R. A PP . P ROC . 2, we cannot entertain the cause. Accordingl y, the m otion of the TDP is granted and the c ause is dismissed f or want of jurisdiction.

Pe r C ur i am Do not publish.
The Honorable Michael James Davis, United States District Judge for the

1

District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-1643

___________

Dale Curtis Patterson, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Austin Medical Center, * UNPUBLISHED

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: September 7, 1998

 Filed: September 11, 1998

___________

Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Dale Curtis Patterson appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his action

1

against Austin Medical Center under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a.

Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions, we affirm the

judgment of the district court for the reasons set forth in its memorandum. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**                                                                                                                                                         EXHIBIT 23**
 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report, dated August 28, 2001, incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements (File Nos. 333-38619, 333-36998, and 333-56726).

 

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

 

 Jackson, MississippiSeptember 27, 2001
Motion Granted, Appeal Reinstated, Appeal Dismissed, and Memorandum 

Opinion filed March 26, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00780-CV

ARPAN GUPTA, Appellant

V.

MONICA PATEL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 334th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-54171

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed July 25, 2022. On March 19, 2024, 

appellant filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1(a). The motion is granted.

We reinstate and dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hassan, Poissant, and Wilson.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4632 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4632

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 19504 Linden Boulevard in St. Albans, New York, as the ``Archie 
                    Spigner Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4632

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 19504 Linden Boulevard in St. Albans, New York, as the ``Archie 
                    Spigner Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 19504 
Linden Boulevard in St. Albans, New York, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Archie Spigner Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Archie Spigner Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4668

To designate the third floor of the Ellis Island Immigration Museum, located 

on Ellis Island in New York Harbor, as the ‘‘Bob Hope Memorial Library’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2004

Mr. ENGEL (for himself and Mr. GALLEGLY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To designate the third floor of the Ellis Island Immigration 

Museum, located on Ellis Island in New York Harbor, 

as the ‘‘Bob Hope Memorial Library’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The third floor of the Ellis Island Immigration Mu5 seum, located on Ellis Island in New York Harbor, shall 

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘Bob Hope Memorial Li7 brary’’. 

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the third 
2

•HR 4668 IH 

1 floor of the Ellis Island Immigration Museum referred to 

2 in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Bob 

3 Hope Memorial Library’’.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 31-18 FORM 10-K CERTIFICATION I, David E. Meador, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of Michigan Consolidated Gas Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    (Intentionally omitted);4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    (Intentionally omitted)c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. /s/ DAVID E. MEADOR

David E. Meador
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of
Michigan Consolidated Gas Company
    
    Date: June 17, 2005
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
    We have audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards,
the financial statements of Amati Communications Corporation included in this
Form 10-K and have issued our report thereon dated September 30, 1997. Our audit
was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements
taken as a whole. The schedule listed in the index above is presented for
purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and is
not part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to
the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements
and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data
required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements
taken as a whole.
 
                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
San Jose, California
September 30, 1997
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated February 2, 2006,  accompanying the consolidated
financial  statements  and  schedules  included  in the Annual  Report of United
Capital  Corp.  and  Subsidiaries  on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31,
2005. We hereby consent to the  incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration  Statements of United Capital Corp. on Form S-8 (Registration  Nos.
33-28045, 33-65140, 333-28395, 333-57873 and 333-98645).

/s/ GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP

New York, New York
March 27, 2006
```
THE MIDLAND COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                Exhibit (21) - Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                              December 31, 1998


   The subsidiaries of the Registrant as of December 31, 1998, all of which are
included in the consolidated financial statements, are as follows:

                                                                    Percentage
                                                     State of        of Voting
                                                   Incorporation    Stock Owned
                                                   -------------    -----------
M/G Transport Services, Inc.                            Ohio             100
Midland - Guardian Co.                                  Ohio             100
MGT Services, Inc.                                      Ohio             100
M/G Sportswear, Inc.                                    Ohio             100

SUBSIDIARIES OF MIDLAND - GUARDIAN CO.:
American Modern Insurance Group, Inc.                   Ohio             100
Marbury Agency, Inc.                                    Ohio             100

SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN MODERN INSURANCE GROUP, INC.:
American Modern Home Insurance Company                  Ohio             100
American Family Home Insurance Company                 Florida           100
The Atlas Insurance Agency, Inc.                        Ohio             100
American Modern Life Insurance Company                  Ohio             100
Midwest Enterprises, Inc.                              Florida           100
Lloyds Modern Corporation                               Texas            100
American Modern Home Service Company                    Ohio             100

SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE CO.:
American Modern Lloyds Insurance Company                Texas            100
American Southern Home Insurance Company               Florida           100
American Western Home Insurance Company               Oklahoma           100
G.U.I.C. Insurance Company                          Pennsylvania         100

SUBSIDIARY OF AMERICAN WESTERN HOME INSURANCE CO.:
Modern Life Insurance Company of Arizona, Inc.         Arizona           100

SUBSIDIARY OF MIDWEST ENTERPRISES, INC.:
Sunbelt General Agency, Inc.                           Alabama           100


   The names of two wholly - owned subsidiaries of The Midland Company are not
shown above as such individual listing is not required.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4471 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4471

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To clarify the loan guarantee authority under title VI of the Native 
    American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4471

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To clarify the loan guarantee authority under title VI of the Native 
    American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeownership Opportunities for 
Native Americans Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL GUARANTEES FOR FINANCING FOR TRIBAL HOUSING ACTIVITIES.

    Section 601 of the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-
Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4191) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Limitation on Percentage.--A guarantee made under this title 
shall guarantee repayment of 95 percent of the unpaid principal and 
interest due on the notes or other obligations guaranteed.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 21, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit(10)(l)(5)**

 

AMENDMENT NO. 4

TO

ALLTEL CORPORATIONPROFIT-SHARING PLAN

(January 1, 2002Restatement)

 

WHEREAS, ALLTEL Corporation (the “Company”) maintainsthe ALLTEL Corporation Profit-Sharing Plan, as amended and restated effectiveJanuary 1, 2002, and as subsequently amended (the “Plan”); and

 

WHEREAS, the Company desires further to amend thePlan;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan inthe respects hereinafter set forth.

 

1.  Effectiveas of March 1, 2003, Appendix D of the Plan is amended by adding a newsubsection (h) at the end thereof to provide as follows:

 

(h)     Each person who

 

(i)            was an active employeeof Cellular XL Associates, L.P. and became an Employee on March 1, 2003;

 

(ii)           met the eligibilityrequirements to become a Participant on or before the last day of the 2003 PlanYear; and

 

(iii)          is not otherwiseeligible for an allocation of Employer Contribution for the 2003 Plan Yearunder Section 13.04;

 

shallreceive an allocation of Employer Contribution for the 2003 Plan Year asprovided in this Appendix D.

 

2.  Effectiveas of September 1, 2003, Appendix D of the Plan is amended by adding a newsubsection (i) at the end thereof to provide as follows:

 

(i)      Each person who

 

(i)            was an active employeeof Western Wireless Corporation and became an Employee on September 1, 2003;

 

(ii)           met the eligibilityrequirements to become a Participant on or before the last day of the 2003 PlanYear; and

 

(iii)          is not otherwiseeligible for an allocation of Employer Contribution for the 2003 Plan Yearunder Section 13.04;

 

----

 

shallreceive an allocation of Employer Contribution for the 2003 Plan Year asprovided in this Appendix D.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, by its dulyauthorized officer, has caused this Amendment to be executed on this 10th dayof December, 2003.

 
|   | ALLTEL CORPORATION |
|--------|--------------------|
|   |               |
|   |               |
|   | By:                | /s/ Scott T. Ford |
|   |               | Title: | President & CEO |

 

----
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). LA / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S A T N A M S IN G H C H A N D I, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 74595 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 402- 232 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 16, 2010 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , P R E G E R S O N , an dR A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S a tna m S i ngh C handi , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons pr o s e f or r e v ie w o f

aB o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rg r an tin g h is m o tio n to r e c o n s id e ran dd e n y in g h is r e q u e s t f o rv o lu n taryd e p artu r e . O u rju r is d ic tio n is



# FI LED MA R 24 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSL A/ Res ea r ch 07- 74595 2 gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo que s t i ons of l aw , i nc l udi ng c la im s o f du e p r o c e s s v io la tio n s in im m ig r a tio n p r o c e e d in g s . Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 4 0 0 F .3 d7 8 5 , 7 9 1 - 9 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . C handi ’ s due pr oc e s s c ont e nt i ons ar e notpe r s ua s i ve . T he B I A di d not e nga ge i n i m pe rm i s s i bl e f a c tf i ndi ng, be c aus e the i m m i gr a t i on j udge ha d a l r e a dy f ound C handi notc r e di bl e , i n partdue t o c ontr a di c t i ons s urr oundi ng hi s da t e of arr iv a l. T h e B I A is p e rm itte dto r e v ie w q u e s tio n s o f law an dd is c r e tio n d e n o v o . See 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 1( d) ( 3) ( i i ) . M or e ove r , c ontr aryt o C handi ’ s c ont e nt i on, the B I A d idn o t e n te ran o r d e ro f r e m o v a l in th e f

ir s t in s tan c e . Se e La ta v . I NS , 204 F . 3d 12 41 , 12 46 (9th C i r. 20 00 ) ( re qu i ri ng error f or a due process vi ol at i on ). PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW D EN I ED .
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Siebert Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Muriel F. Siebert, in my capacity as Chair, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report
filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the report.

|                                              |  |                     
|--------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|/s/ Muriel
 F. Siebert                        |  | Date: March 31, 2011
|                                              |  |                     
|Muriel F.
 Siebert                            |  |                     
|Chair, Chief
 Executive Officer and President |  |                     

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by section 906, has been provided to Siebert Financial Corp. and will be
retained by Siebert Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 26, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135510 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

THOMAS MULCAHY Robert P. Young, Jr. and MARY ALICE 

MULCAHY, Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 135510 

 COA: 275325 
 Wayne CC: 05-530565-CH

JOHN VERHINES and BRENDA VERHINES,

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 25, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0319 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 26, 2008 

 Clerk