alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MOBILE AMERICA CORP. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        25,841,862
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       30,321,793
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         30,811,888
<EQUITIES>                                   1,398,270
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              79,451,616
<CASH>                                       1,082,422
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             398,395
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      (2,743,281)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             124,663,416
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             29,106,729
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         26,913,770
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              9,600,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       191,110
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,368,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               124,663,416
<PREMIUMS>                                  34,943,731
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          4,629,349
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            (230,441)
<OTHER-INCOME>                               8,959,390
<BENEFITS>                                  26,142,808
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  8,410,046
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        16,126,931
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,377,756)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (1,378,222)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (999,534)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (999,534)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.14)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              15,905,704
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         22,435,796
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                            3,469,432
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                          15,897,843
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            14,512,958
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             11,400,131
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                      3,469,432
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File
Nos. 333-125701 and 333-104724) and Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-129784, 333-114258, 333-134992 and
333-148069) of Mines Management, Inc. and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated March 12, 2008 with respect to the consolidated financial statements
of Mines Management, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

| |  | LeMaster & Daniels PLLC   
| |  | --------------------------
| |  | /s/LEMASTER & DANIELS PLLC

March 12,
2008

---



QuickLinks
#### M. D. Whitesides *v.*T. J. Duncan et al.

Pleading — Answer—Demurrer.

The answer was held sufficient on demurrer, where it presented a good ground for abating the action, the same claim having been set up in another suit which was still pending, and plaintiff’s remedy ’ seems to be complete in the pending suit.'

APPEAL, PROM SIMPSON CIRCUIT COURT.

April 1, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

The indebtedness of the estate of George W. Whitesides, being near $8,000 in excess of the personal assets in the administrator’s hands, and that fact having necessitated the suit of the administrators against the creditors of the decedent for a sale of the real es-state and the marshaling of assets, which 'then became subject to the control of the chancellor, it is difficult to see how the appellant, as surviving administrator, could have been guilty of a d'estraint in failing to pay the plaintiff’s judgment. But waiving this, we are satisfied the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the amended answer which, if sufficient, as a bar to the claim, presented good *600grounds for abating the action, the same claim being shown to have been set up in the other suit which was still pending, and it appears that the appellee’s remedy was complete in that suit.

*W. P. D. Bwsh, W. G. Whitesides, for appellant.*

*J. A.*Firm„ *for appellee.*

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to overrule the demurrer as to the amended answer and for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
1

NIST’s RRBC Method to Reduce Registration Error

 

CONTACT: 

Marek Franaszek, 

marek@nist.gov

Gerry Cheok, 

cheok@nist.gov
2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,577
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       128,510
<OTHER-SE>                                   (197,087)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,510)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,510)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,510)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Order entered July 1, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 01599
- CR PATRICK DEYONE LEE, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199
- 80455
- 2014



### O RDER
T he Court GRANTS appellant’s July 29, 2015 second motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief

. We ORDER appellant to file the brief within SEVEN (7) DAYS from the date of this
order.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
HMM Reference NIST Technical Note 2205: Item 34 Attached Retaining Walls

Item 34 Attached Retaining Walls – Replace retaining wall length equal to two times retaining wall height with noncombustible components.

Brick retaining wall attached to house

Stone retaining wall 

attached to house

Burned wood retaining wall 

Burned wood retaining wall 

Note: Selected photographs are included to illustrate each HMM hardening item. Additional vulnerabilities or hardening items may be seen in the photographs, but those are highlighted within their specific HMM item.
· Hardening Actions: Replace retaining wall length equal to two times retaining wall height with ignition resistant components · Applicable Conditions: Combustible retaining wall withing two times the retaining wall height from the residence · Performance Goals: Prevent flames from retaining wall from igniting residence. 

retaining 

must 

o 8 ft Fire Hazards Installation Cautions 1. Seal retaining wall and house joint with ignition resistant material. 

e: A 

1/1 8 ft 1
United States Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international system of units (SI), documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully 

completed training and proficiency tests, documented calibration intervals, submitted a quality management system, and 

demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope

(Rev.: September 2021)

2023

____________________________________

Katrice Lippa, Chief

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

Effective Dates: 2023-02-01 to 2024-02-01

Mass Echelon I

30 kg to 1 mg

50 lb to 0.001 lb

Mass Echelon II

250 kg to 1 mg

2500 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Mass Echelon III

1000 kg to 1 mg

2500 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Weight Carts

6000 lb to 3000 lb

Lottery Balls

2.65 g

Volume Gravimetric, I

50 mL

100 gal to 1 gill

Volume Gravimetric, I SVP

30 gal to 5 gal 

Volume Transfer, II

2000 gal to 1 gal

Volume Transfer, II LPG

110 gal to 24 gal

Length, Lottery Balls

39 mm to 37 mm 

Temperature III, IV

660 °C to -30 °C

1220 °F to -22 °F

North Carolina

NOTE: This Scope does not cover 

calibrations at remote or field 

locations.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERIC JOSEPH FLOYD, also named as: Eric J Floyd,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

MACKENZIE, Correctional Officer (CO II) at Barchey Unit, Lewis Complex, aka per Doc 21 also known as Unknown McKenzie; FAGA, Unknown; Correctional Officer (CO II) at Barchey Unit, Lewis Complex; DAISY AKINWALE, Nurse at Barchey Unit, Lewis Complex; TRICIA PITTS, Nurse at Barchey Unit, Lewis Complex; BROGDEN,

Unknown Graveyard Sgt. at Barchey Unit, Lewis Complex; CONN, Unknown Day Shift Sgt. at Barchey Unit, Lewis Complex,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 22

- 16011

D.C. No.

2:20

- cv

- 02222

- JJT

- JFM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted Ju ly 3, 2024 * *

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 3 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 22

- 16011

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Eric Joseph Floyd appeals pro se the district court’s

summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that appellants violated

his Eighth Amendment rights in connection with the use of leg restraints while

escorting him to obtain medical treatment

. We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Floyd ’s claim

against correctional officer MacKenzie because Floyd failed to raise a genuine

dispute of material fact as to whether MacKenzie was deliberately indifferent to

Floyd’s safety when she u tilized leg shackling restraints when walking Floyd to the

medical unit for treatment of his asthma. Keenan v. Hall , 83 F.3d 1083, 108 9 (9th

Cir. 1996) ( granting summary judgment when shackling did not cause injury or

discomfort beyond that inherent from movement in restraints )

.

We do not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal, including

Floyd’s contention that the district court should have requested additional medical

records. Smith v. Marsh

, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir 1999 ). Nor do we consider

issues not specifically raised and argued in the opening brief. See id.

AFFIRMED.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4527 

To enhance the criminal penalties for illegal trafficking of archaeological 

resources, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2004 

Mr. PALLONE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Resources, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To enhance the criminal penalties for illegal trafficking of 

archaeological resources, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enhanced Protection 

5 of Our Cultural Heritage Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENHANCED PENALTIES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE 

7 CRIMES. 

8 (a) ENHANCED PENALTY FOR ILLEGAL TRAF9 FICKING IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES.—Section 6(d) 
2 

•HR 4527 IH 

1 of the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 

2 (16 U.S.C. 470ee(d)) is amended by striking ‘‘not more 

3 than $10,000’’ and all that follows through the end of the 

4 subsection, and inserting ‘‘not more than $100,000, im5 prisoned not more than 10 years, or both.’’. 

6 (b) ENHANCED PENALTY FOR EMBEZZLEMENT AND

7 THEFT FROM INDIAN TRIBAL ORGANIZATIONS.—Section 

8 1163 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by strik9 ing ‘‘five years’’ and inserting ‘‘10 years’’. 

10 (c) ENHANCED PENALTY FOR ILLEGAL TRAF11 FICKING IN NATIVE AMERICAN HUMAN REMAINS AND

12 CULTURAL ITEMS.—Section 1170 of title 18, United 

13 States Code, is amended— 

14 (1) in subsection (a)— 

15 (A) by inserting ‘‘or attempts to sell, pur16 chase, use for profit, or transport for sale or 

17 profit,’’ before ‘‘human remains’’; and 

18 (B) by striking ‘‘or imprisoned not more 

19 than 12 months, or both, and in the case of a 

20 second or subsequent violation, be fined in ac21 cordance with this title, or imprisoned not more 

22 than 5 years’’ and inserting ‘‘imprisoned not 

23 more than 10 years’’; and 

24 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘imprisoned 

25 not more than one year, or both, and in the case of 
3 

•HR 4527 IH 

1 a second or subsequent violation, be fined in accord2 ance with this title, imprisoned not more than 5 

3 years’’ and inserting ‘‘imprisoned not more than 10 

4 years’’. 

Æ
SCWC-15-0000949

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

 

WINDWARD CHRISTIAN CHURCH, previously known as

First Baptist Church-Windward, and ALAN BROWN,

Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs.

ONE LOVE MINISTRIES, BOB HAMILTON,

DAVID TIPTON, KALO TV, INC.,

Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-15-0000949; CIVIL NO. 13-1-2905-10)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants Windward Christian

Church and Alan Brown’s application for writ of certiorari filed

on October 14, 2019, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, December 4, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-15-0000949

04-DEC-2019

08:08 AM
No. 16,546.

#### Allen *v.*The State.

Filed April 22, 1892.

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

*W. P. Fishback, W. A. Kappes,*— *Mack,*— *Henry, J. E. Piety*and *J. D. Piety,*for appellant.

*A. G. Smith,*Attorney General, for the State.

Olds, J.

This is a prosecution against the appellant in which he is charged with contempt of court. The facts in this case are substantially the same as those in the case of *Fishback*v. *State, ante,*p. 304. The charge is the publication of the same newspaper articles upon which the charge of contempt is based in that case, and upon the authority of that case this case is reversed, with instruction to grant a new trial, and proceed in accordance with the law as stated in said cause of *Fishback*v. *State, supra,*and discharge the appellant.
#### Hannah Whitaker, etc., *v.*Thos. Clark's Adm'r.

Husband and Wife — Real Estate — Mortgage by Wife.

Under Act Feb. 13, 1866, entitled “An act to amend § 17, art. 4, ch. 47, R. S.,” a wife to whose sole and separate use land has been transferred may mortgage the land by joining with her husband, and thereby render the land liable for his debts.

APPEAL FROM HARRISON CIRCUIT COURT.

September 13, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

The land sought to be sold by a foreclosure of the.mortgage set forth in the petition was not devised to Mrs. Whitaker, nor does she claim it under a conveyance, but when she joined her husband in the mortgage she held it under an executory contract with S. F. Tebbs, who had not himself the legal title to the land, but as the writing which he executed to her recites that for and in consideration of $1,200 to him in hand paid and $1,500 to be paid the 1st day of January, 1866, with interest from date, and for which Mrs. Hannah Whitaker had executed to him her note, he transferred to her sole and separate use all of his interest in said land, and authorized* the master commissioner of the Harrison Circuit Court to convey *82that part of the tract not conveyed to Lebus to Mrs. Whitaker’s sole and separate use. He retained a lien on the land for the unpaid purchase money, and in the conveyance to be made to her by the master, she was to have secured to her the authority to sell and dispose of said land without his further consent.

Trimble, *for appellants.*

*E. H. Smith■, J..Q.*Ward, *for appellees.*

No conveyance whatever seems to have been made to her by the master commissioner of the Harrison Circuit Court.

The land had neither been devised nor conveyed to her separate use, and is not therefore embraced by the 17th Section of Article 4,' Chapter 47, of the Revised Statutes, consequently she is not prohibited by said section from alienating such estate as she acquired by the obligation of Tebbs. But even if that obligation should be considered as within the spirit and meaning of said section, still the power of alienating the estate is secured to her in said instrument under which she asked by joining her husband in the mortgage she subjected the land to the payment of the debt therein mentioned. Such alienation is authorized by an act approved February 13, 1866, entitled “An act. to amend Section 17, Article 4, of Chapter 47 of the Revised Statutestitle Husband and Wife, My-er’s Supp. 728.

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed-.*
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4608 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4608

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic located in 
 Peoria, Illinois, as the ``Bob Michel Department of Veterans Affairs 
                          Outpatient Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 2004

  Mr. LaHood (for himself, Mr. Hastert, Mr. Johnson of Illinois, Mr. 
  Davis of Illinois, Mr. Rush, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Evans, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. 
Kirk, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. Emanuel, 
Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Crane, Mrs. Biggert, Mr. Weller, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. 
Costello, Mr. Lewis of California, Mr. Sandlin, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Miller of 
    Florida, Mr. Portman, Mr. Upton, Mr. Frost, Mr. Petri, and Mr. 
  Bilirakis) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To name the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic located in 
 Peoria, Illinois, as the ``Bob Michel Department of Veterans Affairs 
                          Outpatient Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC, 
              PEORIA, ILLINOIS.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic located in 
Peoria, Illinois, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be 
known and designated as the ``Bob Michel Department of Veterans Affairs 
Outpatient Clinic''. Any reference to such outpatient clinic in any 
law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United 
States shall be considered to be a reference to the Bob Michel 
Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic.
                                 <all>
```
#### In re David P. BOYCE, Rajendra Mehta, and David F. Laurash.

No. 00-1524.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: May 11, 2001.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, LINN and DYK, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
NVLAP LAB BULLETIN NUMBER: LB-115-2020 PAGE: 1 of 1

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National 

Institute of Standards and Technology National

Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

ISSUE DATE:

January 14, 2020

LAB BULLETIN

NUMBER: LB-115-2020

LAP: ECT

SUBJECT: Revision of Handbook 150-11A Checklist, ECT: FCC Equipment Authorization 

Requirements for Recognition

The purpose of this bulletin is to notify laboratories of the revision of the Handbook 150-11A 

program specific checklist, ECT: FCC Equipment Authorization Requirements for Recognition, 

based on the FCC Technical Assessment Evaluation Checklist – March 2, 2018 and Testing 

Laboratory Scope of Accreditation of the FCC Accredited Testing Laboratory Program Roles and 

Responsibilities – April 2, 2019, Appendix A, Table A1.

Notice

The Handbook 150-11A program specific checklist, ECT: FCC Equipment Authorization 

Requirements for Recognition, based on the FCC Technical Assessment Evaluation Checklist –

March 2, 2018 and Testing Laboratory Scope of Accreditation of the FCC Accredited Testing 

Laboratory Program Roles and Responsibilities – April 2, 2019, Appendix A, Table A1, was

revised on January 14, 2020.

The primary changes are in Table 1, “Technology in support of FCC Certification approval 

procedures.”

Use of this checklist is effective immediately, and supersedes the previous version dated 

October 1, 2018. The current checklist can be found on the NVLAP website at 

https://www.nist.gov/nvlap/electromagnetic-compatibility-and-telecommunications-lap.

Questions should be directed to Bradley Moore, bradley.moore@nist.gov, 301-975-5740, 

Amanda McDonald, amanda.mcdonald@nist.gov, 301-975-5627, or Janneth Marcelo, 

janneth.marcelo@nist.gov, 301-975-8520.