alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

# Mestek, Inc.260 North Elm Street  Westfield, Massachusetts 01085



# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER

# PURSUANT TO

# 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

# AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

# SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Mestek, Inc. (the Corporation) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen M. Shea, Chief
Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                      | 
|--------------------- | 
|
|Date:  March 31, 2005 | 
|                      | 
|                      |
Stock Offer Letter date November 14, 2005 to Mark Sopp from SAIC


 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 [Letterhead of Science Applications International Corporation] 
  
 November 14, 2005 
  
 Mark W. Sopp 
 2239 Paseo Saucedal 
 Carlsbad, CA 92009 
  
 Dear Mark: 
  
 Following your employment with
SAIC, you will be awarded 2,3051 shares of SAIC’s vesting Class A Common Stock. The shares will be
credited to your account and a Stock Restriction Agreement will be forwarded to you as soon as practicable after the start of your employment with SAIC. This Agreement will need to be signed and returned within 120 days from the award date or the
award will be forfeited. The value of the shares awarded may vary depending upon the stock price in effect when the stock is issued. Currently, the stock price is $43.39 per share and is currently scheduled to be re-evaluated on
December 9, 2005. The process used to establish the stock price is described in our Form 10-K, a copy of which will be provided at the new hire orientation. Except for applicable state and Federal taxes, this stock will be awarded at no
cost to you. 
  
 The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has approved
a request that you be granted a vesting option to purchase up to 65,000 shares of SAIC’s Class A Common Stock. The option would be granted pursuant to the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, a copy of which will be provided at the new hire
orientation. The exercise price of such option will be $43.39 per share. An option agreement will be forwarded to you within a few weeks following your date of hire. 
  
 You will also be eligible to participate in the incentive compensation plan referred to in your employment offer letter. The long-term
component of your annual incentive compensation will consist of stock granted on option. The number of option shares granted at target will equal $1,400,000 divided by one half of the Stock Price in effect when the option shares are granted.

  
 SAIC Class A Common Stock is subject to certain restrictions described in
Article Fourth of SAIC’s Certificate of Incorporation, a copy of which will be provided at the new hire orientation. Any offering will be based upon the Prospectus and Summary Plan Descriptions, copies of which will be provided at the new hire
orientation. If you have any questions regarding the acquisition of SAIC’s securities, please contact SAIC’s Stock Programs Department at (800) 785-7764 in San Diego, California. 
  
 Very truly yours, 
  
 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION 

	
	
	 /s/ BERNIE THEULE

	 Bernie Theule
 Senior Vice President
 Corporate Human Resources




	1	This award may be deferred in the SAIC Key Executive Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. In order to defer your vesting stock you must complete the enclosed
deferral forms and return them to SAIC before your first day of work.
Order entered July 1 5 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00535
- CV
JIMMY LEE MENIFEE , Appellant

V. MAYOR ERIC JOHNSON AND THE CITY OF DALLAS , Appellee s

On A ppeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 21
- 05003

O RDER
A ppellant has been deemed a vexatious litigant and is subject to a prefiling order , but the Court does not have an order from the local administrati ve judge allowing th is appeal. See T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R EM
. C ODE A NN
. § § 11.101, 11.102. Accordingly, pursuant to section 11.1035 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, this appeal is STAYED and will be dismissed without further notice unless, no l ater than July 2 6 , 20 21 , appellant obtains an order from the appropriate localadministrative judge permitting the filing of this appeal and files the order with this

Court. See id. 11. 1 035(b).

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1965

BRYCE GERALD RANDALL NOWLAN,

Petitioner - Appellee,

v.

NINA LYNN NOWLAN, f/k/a Nina Lynn Brown,

Respondent - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Harrisonburg. Thomas T. Cullen, District Judge. (5:20-cv-00102-TTC)

Submitted: December 6, 2021 Decided: January 4, 2022

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul G. Beers, GLENN, FELDMANN, DARBY & GOODLATTE, Roanoke, Virginia, for 

Appellant. Stephen J. Cullen, Kelly A. Powers, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE P.C., 

Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Nina Lynn Nowlan (“Nina”) appeals the district court’s order granting Bryce Gerald 

Randall Nowlan’s (“Bryce”) Petition for Return of the Child under the Hague Convention 

on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. The court determined that the 

Nowlans’ child, AEN, was a habitual resident of Canada when Nina took AEN to Virginia. 

The court further determined that Nina did not show by clear and convincing evidence that 

AEN would be in grave risk of harm if AEN was returned to Canada to live with Bryce. 

We affirm. 

A child’s habitual residence is a mixed question of law and fact. Monasky v. 

Taglieri, 140 S. Ct. 719, 730 (2020). The first issue is whether the district court identified 

“the governing totality-of-the-circumstances standard.” Id. The second issue involves 

answering a factual question: “Was the child at home in the particular country at issue.” 

Id. Our review of the district court’s decision is for clear error. Id. We conclude that the 

district court applied the correct legal standard and did not clearly err in determining that 

AEN’s habitual residence was Canada when Nina took AEN to Virginia. We further 

conclude that the district court did not err in determining that Nina did not prove by clear 

and convincing evidence that AEN would be in grave risk of harm if the child was returned 

to Canada. See Miller v. Miller, 240 F.3d 392, 402 (4th Cir. 2001) (stating burden of proof). 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Nowlan v. 

Nowlan, No. 5:20-cv-00102-TTC (W.D. Va. June 10, 2021). We dispense with oral 
3

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6642** 

OVELL T. BARBER , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

– Appellee
.

Appeal from the Un ited States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Jerome B. Friedman, Senior D istrict Judge. ( 2:10

- cv - 00482

- JBF

- TEM )

Submitted : September 19, 2011 Decided: September 28, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Ovell T. Barber, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ovell T. Barber seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief o n the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Coc krell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a cons titutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Barber has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argume nt because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4580 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4580

     To remove certain restrictions on the Mammoth Community Water 
 District's ability to use certain property acquired by that District 
                        from the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2004

  Mr. McKeon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To remove certain restrictions on the Mammoth Community Water 
 District's ability to use certain property acquired by that District 
                        from the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS ON PROPERTY.

    Notwithstanding Public Law 90-171 (16 U.S.C. 484a; 81 Stat. 531), 
the approximately 25 acres patented to the Mammoth County Water 
District (known as the ``Mammoth Community Water District'') by Patent 
No. 04-87-0038, on June 26, 1987, and recorded in Volume 482, at page 
517 of the official records of the Recorder's Office, Mono County, 
California, may be used for purposes other than the purpose for which 
those lands were being used prior to the conveyance to the Mammoth 
County Water District and such lands may be transferred as authorized 
under State law.
                                 <all>
```
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4345

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2004

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

maximum amount of home loan guaranty available under 

the home loan guaranty program of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 4345 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN, AND ANNUAL INDEXING OF, MAX2 IMUM AMOUNT OF HOME LOAN GUARANTY 

3 FOR CONSTRUCTION AND PURCHASE OF 

4 HOMES. 

5 (a) MAXIMUM LOAN GUARANTY BASED ON 100 PER6 CENT OF THE FREDDIE MAC CONFORMING LOAN

7 RATE.—Section 3703(a)(1) is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘$60,000’’ each place it appears in subparagraphs 

9 (A)(i)(IV) and (B) and inserting ‘‘the maximum guaranty 

10 amount (as defined in subparagraph (C))’’. 

11 (b) DEFINITION.—Such section is further amended 

12 by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

13 ‘‘(C) In this paragraph, the term ‘maximum guaranty 

14 amount’ means the dollar amount that is equal to 25 per15 cent of the Freddie Mac conforming loan limit limitation 

16 determined under section 305(a)(2) of the Federal Home 

17 Loan Mortgage Corporation Act (12 U.S.C. 1454(a)(2)) 

18 for a single-family residence, as adjusted for the year in19 volved.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 23, 2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
L&R Committee 2014 Final Report 

Appendix C – NIST Handbook 130, Items 232-6 and 237-9: Method of Sale/Fuels 

L&R - C1 

Appendix C 

NIST Handbook 130 

Uniform Regulation for the Method of Sale 

Items: 

232-6: 2.30. E85 Fuel Ethanol Flex Fuel Blends and 

237-9: Section 1. Definitions, Section 2. Standard Fuel Specifications, and Section 3. Classification and 

Method of Sale of Petroleum Items 

Table of Contents 

Item Page L&R – C

Letter from FALS to the Federal Trade Commission (June 13, 2014) ............................................................................ 3

 
L&R Committee 2014 Final Report 

Appendix C – NIST Handbook 130, Items 232-6 and 237-9: Method of Sale/Fuels 

L&R - C2 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 

 
L&R Committee 2014 Final Report 

Appendix C – NIST Handbook 130, Items 232-6 and 237-9: Method of Sale/Fuels 

L&R - C3 
L&R Committee 2014 Final Report 

Appendix C – NIST Handbook 130, Items 232-6 and 237-9: Method of Sale/Fuels 

L&R - C4 
L&R Committee 2014 Final Report 

Appendix C – NIST Handbook 130, Items 232-6 and 237-9: Method of Sale/Fuels 

L&R - C5 
L&R Committee 2014 Final Report 

Appendix C – NIST Handbook 130, Items 232-6 and 237-9: Method of Sale/Fuels 

L&R - C6 
L&R Committee 2014 Final Report 

Appendix C – NIST Handbook 130, Items 232-6 and 237-9: Method of Sale/Fuels 

L&R - C7 

 
L&R Committee 2014 Final Report 

Appendix C – NIST Handbook 130, Items 232-6 and 237-9: Method of Sale/Fuels 

L&R - C8
- Page 1 - front-page
- Page 2 - front-page
- Page 3 - description
- Page 4 - description
- Page 5 - description
- Page 6 - description
- Page 7 - description
- Page 8 - description
- Page 9 - description
- Page 10 - description
- Page 11 - description
- Page 12 - description
- Page 13 - description
- Page 14 - description
- Page 15 - description
- Page 16 - description
- Page 17 - description
- Page 18 - description
- Page 19 - claims
- Page 20 - claims
- Page 21 - claims
- Page 22 - claims
- Page 23 - claims
- Page 24 - claims
- Page 25 - claims
- Page 26 - claims
- Page 27 - claims
- Page 28 - drawings
- Page 29 - drawings
- Page 30 - drawings
- Page 31 - drawings
- Page 32 - drawings
- Page 33 - drawings
- Page 34 - drawings
- Page 35 - drawings
- Page 36 - drawings
- Page 37 - drawings
- Page 38 - drawings
- Page 39 - drawings
- Page 40 - drawings
- Page 41 - wo-search-report
- Page 42 - wo-search-report
- Page 43 - wo-search-report
H. Res. 550

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 24, 1998.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 4112) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1999,

and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The

conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4472 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4472

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
    expand the definition of firefighter to include apprentices and 
            trainees, regardless of age or duty limitations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 1, 2004

 Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. 
   Andrews, Mr. Pascrell, and Mr. Smith of Michigan) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
    expand the definition of firefighter to include apprentices and 
            trainees, regardless of age or duty limitations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Christopher Kangas Fallen 
Firefighter Apprentice Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF DEFINITION OF FIREFIGHTER TO INCLUDE APPRENTICES 
              AND TRAINEES.

    Section 1204(4) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b(4)) is amended by inserting ``, regardless of 
age, status as an apprentice or trainee, or duty restrictions imposed 
because of age or status as an apprentice or trainee,'' after ``fire 
department''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall apply with respect to deaths 
and injuries which occur on or after May 4, 2002.
```
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Anthony J. Miceli, Chief Financial Officer of United Capital Corp., (the “Company”), does hereby certify, with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) that:
  
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:  April 28, 2010
 
 By:
/s/ Anthony J. MiceliAnthony J. MiceliChief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha
      Nutra, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September
      30,
      2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), I, Yue Pu, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and will be retained by China
      Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




August
                19, 2008
            By:
            */s/ Yue Pu*Name: Yue Pu
              Title:  Vice Chairman (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 422

To authorize the Pyramid of Remembrance Foundation to establish a memorial in the District of Columbia or its environs to soldiers who have 

lost their lives during peacekeeping operations, humanitarian efforts, 

training, terrorist attacks, or covert operations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2003

Mr. LATOURETTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To authorize the Pyramid of Remembrance Foundation to 

establish a memorial in the District of Columbia or its 

environs to soldiers who have lost their lives during 

peacekeeping operations, humanitarian efforts, training, 

terrorist attacks, or covert operations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Pyramid of Remembrance 

5 Foundation is authorized to establish a memorial on Fed6 eral land within the area designated as ‘‘Area II’’ on the 

7 map referred to in section 2(e) of the Commemorative 
2

•HR 422 IH 

1 Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1002(e)), to honor members of the 

2 Armed Forces of the United States who have lost their 

3 lives during peacekeeping operations, humanitarian ef4 forts, training, terrorist attacks, or covert operations. 

5 (b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMO6 RATIVE WORKS.—The Pyramid of Remembrance Founda7 tion shall establish the memorial authorized by this Act 

8 in accordance with the Commemorative Works Act (40 

9 U.S.C. 1001, et seq.), except that subsection (b) and (c) 

10 of section 3 of that Act shall not apply. 

11 SEC. 2. FUNDS FOR MEMORIAL. 

12 (a) USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS PROHIBITED.—Except 

13 as provided by the Commemorative Works Act, no Federal 

14 funds may be used to pay any expense of the establish15 ment of the memorial. 

16 (b) DEPOSIT OF EXCESS FUNDS.—If—

17 (1) upon payment of all expenses of the estab18 lishment of the memorial, including payment to the 

19 Treasury of the maintenance and preservation 

20 amount required by section 8(b) of the Commemora21 tive Works Act; or 

22 (2) upon expiration of the authority for the me23 morial under section 10(b) of the Commemorative 

24 Works Act, 
3

•HR 422 IH 

1 there remains a balance of funds received for the establish2 ment of the memorial, the Pyramid of Remembrance 

3 Foundation shall transmit that balance to the Secretary 

4 of the Treasury for deposit in the account provided for 

5 in section 8(b)(1) of the Commemorative Works Act.

Æ