IN THE COURT OF Cfclttlis/AL AWEALS OF TEXAS

AT AUSTIN/ TEXAS MQTK , , DATE: U&l )<; BY: ft' re JOE 7PJWAS ^EMAVI\^ES Trial (W Mo^^^HOV^W Tbcj-ib No.oi&\acm HeWW/ \vlR-"76,<U>03

V.


### COutlT OF bALLAS,DALLAS JA®082Q1$ 

### COUMTV TEXAS AbeMcoste,C/eric

MOTION FOK ANAmAL^>OHV WSOANT TO TEXAS CObE CRIMINALWlXEfcURE AMN. A«X44.04 COnES NOWI, JOE TRAWAS ^EVviAVX^Sj^d Wes +he Courij 

### \wsuCma\ -Vo Tex.CocU (W.Vroc.Avmo.^.^4.04j +o reccesJ- \M Oa\\ tc sel. ~^i!i 'WoViaA is oased up<v\ KeWWs r'ic^V to Wm pe^d\v\cx 

### cx^eal fufsvAcw\V ta TexXoAeCr^.rYoc.Awn.^. 44.0*4.T/i sup^oc^
\. 0\a vIaAu.(\vr\A ^(oj3000 \ir\e. K.eWW p\ed a^Uru Vd tkAwor^ o^
a CovnWW Su^sW^ce. 'v\ Ccx^l l\lo. E^V3nO<i-nWj Possession o-P ov 10CowVrolltd Su^sVcuAce"' Coc&.\v\e m Case. Mo.F^-.21708-Wj a^ol possessio/\ o? ex CowtaoWea SuWtaAAce., Xnlttnt to Deliver'. Cocaine in Case No,
F^-anio-vvi. 2. Thev^e. was a ^Wa \>a;fa<\\Y\ A<\rtav\ev\{ whev~e the. Relator was 

### ad^AcUcaYed cxva\\V\^o? tW«. aUeoWe.\Ases.7nc delator's se/\+e*ct was cxsse-SSed tont ^0 uewrs \v\c&rc£raViD\A V\ Ca^e. Nio. F^^HO^-WW <m\A 

### 2 v^ears Ya Ca^^os.F°l°i^\108-W(x^l F^V3HI0-W,UeWaWs se*- Vev\ces 'we*re suspended ow\d V\e_ was placed ow 5 ^ea\rs cowwviia\a»"Vv\ Supervision ccn^AoeAciAa o\a aa\AVACx\ra ^^>,5000, 3. 1a Xvavn?, Q000, tW Sx\aW VioWW \yroWV\cv\ and Wc\s

^^AT<Lncxci to 45 daus deVev\V\<xv iv\ OaUcxs Couhti\ dall sta\rV\v\c\ 

### lTvaIv^\4j 3000 and enclw August 31,3000.TWealW tta 5$e«rs reavA\ar ^robariOA was re'\ASTared

. 

### 4. Xa A^vasVj 3003. tW tle\aW vioWted. broWtiO/'i clue to.oi VUefl od\avAct-\oa V\ C^se. Nio.FOi-34613-W. 8.e\uW was senWced •Vo 30 fionth-s V\ TbCT- SVc^Vc Ja\\ msaid case, cha NlcWe^b^r 1} 

### 200^ as ^avrlr ot <k ^\ea ^afo,cx\v\ Ao^reeneiAt, 5. On \h<L sai^e, dav\ ot No\ie.mbe^r lJ(^003 a ^ucWrie/if was entered nwokin* -\W ^coWV'i'OA In Case Nlos. FSV^HO0! -nw, F^4

- (2)an08-W and F^-aniO-W. dcUW sentenced to IOuears IbCJ \a Case Mo. F°i°l-3nOVWW. Sentenced to 30 ^tlns TbCJT- State Jck'd 1a Cevse Nios, F^-SnOg-W and F°i°i-2niO-\A/ on floe same dede. All caj.es to iru^i concurrent ajona wI-Ha Case Kio,F03-34<W3- VJ as \n ootn Plea Dcvraa\v\ Acweewe/i-fs. (o. On Hau Ik^OO'B) a V\ea.\r'ina was ne\d and delator was 

### ^Wed oa 8 uears shock probaVlon. \n Case Mo. F4°i-3H 0^1-HV\), Said t)NfOOat\OA to Commence on t^au 10, 3003>, delator renamed Va CMsYodu due to 30 irwontUs m TbCJ-SFate Jcxil \v\ the o-tner tWee. eases. Sulo^eauenVU ^released °^ Aprd S&^OO^ and actual

^Co^Menxe^en-T of oUock WobaFion ',* Case Mo, WOI1M-MW. 

### 7.On MgutcIa 31, 3005 tke (leWW was cowto[ad ot SUbn<^ 

### aAcl sentenced to ^ ^eairs lnca\rcefaV\on.CaSeM°^ FOS-OOOOGi-IW, 8. On I^Wcn 35;3005; <*. \adqevnent Was en^ed revoW'iAa 

### tU ieWVoTS Snodc VW)aY>on -lv> Cas-t Mo, Pl°l-31104"^ |U K.e\aVo\r was SenVev\c<>d TO 10 uears \nca\rce\fatio>A. UttiAa tnjz. S^Sf>ev\sion ot YUis sentence orlcynallw, InOosed on Ja^uaA/* 9-Wj 

### 5000 as ^>arl- o£ or"»uned vWu bar&ain /Lree/vieinf, OiA twe sa/vie. c\au tvy-e tv'ial Couird u added'' a. c^MiAlafiOn Order. Ordealnathvs sentence, to fuv\ consecutive to Case Klo.FOS'OOOOS-XW, 

### S.O^ YWcU 35^ 2005 Ike delator \-\led o, -/noW tW neW YvSod \v\ bo-\U cases. On Waroh 31; 300S tk^ ^offan ton new Vial w^s cveluded In boYU ceases, 10. On Ho\ie>\be\r Q, 3005 delator 4\\ed a noFice o( appeal. 

### \\. Oa F«.Wwa^ 31,3001 Coarl of Appeals F'ttb \Vivlr\ctot Texas aV "ballas A-?titled tbe Convictions In Doth C&seS. l2.4 UpoA enW\A& TbCiT oia Hxu, 8,3001 all se/denc&s we^e sIaowa Concurrent aAd Relator continued to serve 10 yea^r senYence tV\ab was Wst banded down. 

### 13.IVe to backfime Gredibs mot awarded correctly tbe \CeWYof Made requesK tWouab Tjrvie Ciredit Slesolatlo^ uisnate and TbCJ-SYaFe Counsel For Offenders. Mob s^YaStied with 

### tbe resvdts. \le\aFoY- tlVd Writ ot habeas Corpus tor tbe tntSsi'Acv baclcViAoe credits. 14. Iss^ne. was a^t coa^iT-able Oa babeas bub trial Court still awarded the. rewaivum Ored>ts and Case Nlo. F^-3110^- 

### t^lW was obscbcxr^ed On dune 5, 30Q, On tbrs dat^ delator beaan &e.TviAc\ ^ena\A(W of ^ H^ar sentence In Case Kta.FOS-OOO^i-IW,15. Klunt ^ro Yunc Yded \n Case Nlo. FO5-00OO°\ araui/ia Yor backFinnt Credds and Order aranted (Aarcb l&, 3013 .cbawcyna He\aW's re\e.ase date to AuaiAst 3^.30\1>.Oa |Ls date audit was done oa KelaYot's Vile, and be was detained due to tne cuwula

### f\on order V\ CaseKlo,F^VSllO^V^W, ileWYor \s Currently SefViAa remainder of 10 uea\T senYence as ftarf of \°\ ^ear SenYeAce. due bo CuvnulaYion Order runnlna tbis senYence con

### Sec^xflv/e to 4 ^ear sentence \v\ Case ^o. F05-00004-iw. \(o. HeWW filed \Jr\\ of Ylabeas, Corpus \v\ Case l\lo. F44- 

### 3HOVMW oa VWcb 6,30\4. 0a 'Ha^^aOiq Caurt of CrVnnod Appeals aenied witboat written order Ybe upplicaYlon Tor wnf 

### of babeas Corpus on Ybe YiaA\^s of Ybe trial Court wltbout abeArlv^/



### ,17.On fV^ 15,3014 WaYor fiUd YloV.on To Include PWlO" randuvn Tn SiAt^ort Of \dr\\ Of Ylabeas Corpus and Appella/d's Uepld^ To SYaYe's ResponseTo A^pbcaYlon For UriY -Of tUbeas Corpus As Part Of Tbe Record For Review OfVJrlY Of Habeas Corpus. 3a\d nobion 

### denied bu CourtofCrVmlvvdAppeals Oa June 11,3014. 16, On June 34,^.014 sa'\Y was also filed bu Kelodrcr 

### uj/^W ^o" 0-S.C. LStobon] ^^Sd^ Joe Trav^pas Ibewcwldes V.

### Wdbavn SYe^bens, u\recW. V Civil Action No. 31N-cv-^^oYC^ 

### Act*ova sVdl ^ev\d\n^ and ope/i, W. Oa June 35,3014, delator filed Motlov, To (W^lew 

### Appellants Vmt Of Habeas Corpus Pursuant" To Texas Code OF CrivniAal rfoceduft Am.At\- 11.01 And IW Fourteenth Avnend- 

### ^Cnb To The \dS. Constitution/ ^avcl Cotton denied b^ CourY of Cr\rV\na\ Appeals On Juli^ 8, 30|4. 

### £0. On ^occe^Fer 15)3^4, delator bebeviina bie bad 

### mo oYber adec|uatt SYcAc remedy aY bw; filed Oriainal Abdication For VJr'J Of ^AandurAvAS," 

### 31. As Ybe Sole around, for Ybe instant ^etlfion, Ke\aYor usks YWs Court Yo eoASider wbeYber the Ke\ato\r is eligible For- (kv\ appeal bond a^rsuanb fo 7eXCode Crivn,rroc.Aaia.art. M4.04,

### VJHFtlFFOtlF, \le\ator respecttalla moves this Court fo oxanY a V/rlY of Habeas, Corpus, und bo\d a hearing Yo deY

### ern'me bis eligibility tor an aps^l bon.d.

<tiKeSpecYYull^ oubw^ltled
iLoAUflAnAJs) be TrovMAasloenavides, *lo/3093> CK.e\aFor] xeYitionef\

Clewe^ts Uni t 4G>0| Spur 541 A^arillo/Tc, 74101

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE X herebu CerYifu fbab a true and accurate Cop^ of the doreaolna has bee\A Sent bu Certified 05. f^ai | 

### on \bis Ybe CM dau^ of iU^iAara 50 15 to the 

### Wslclin^Jud^ej3G>3rd Judicial Oistricf Court of ualUs 

## County7e*as, \V^> tvi.diver-front Hrd. 5fU Floor3Dallas
Texas ISSiol.-

/V -? ^U T77 Joe tra^ipas benav/iaeS 

### tdeWfor/PeYltio^erN

17)IU THE COURT OF CRItniHAL ATOALS OF TEXAS

AT AOSTIU TEXAS

JOE TRATOAS ^EMAVI^ES Trial Court islo.F^OlW-MW SlebWl WR-76,481-03 (Va-Web")

v. ?>G>2>rci OWLCIAL "frlSTRICT COURT OF DALLAS, DALLAS COOMTV 7FKASResponaanY. MWORA^W* XNi SUrVOfcT OF MOTION FOR AM AWEAL VNfc YURSUAMT TO TEXAS CObE CRIMINAL ?ROCEbUfcE AWiARWO^

Ped'tF'Noner rewcftwu^ subr^iYs tWf he is entitled fo bond 

### ^encllna appeal ^ursManY bo 7eX.CodeCrivn,Vroc.Ann.Art. 44.04. VeY'dioner requests that Ybe court- \ssue a Writ of HabeasCorpus, and find VvVrV eWble for bond.VeY'dloner also ^quests o\ bearlAQ

on V\ls c\alvns. STATEMENT OF ISSUES X. The ^cY'dioner \s enY'dWd do a reasonable appeal bond



### ^wdVio^ Ws appeal /VMV of fVandaynws.STATEMENT OF jORTStttCTIONl Texas provides an oa/enue for rnatbecs perfatnlna to bail ^end'ma a^eabThere are. Ynree means fo review bail pending 

### aA a^eal'.Cft b\^ an appeal ^ur-suanY to Article 44.04(aY)(2\ bi^ 

### osteal from (x denial of writ of Y^abeas corpus pursuant do 

### Arb\ele 44.3>6>> V.A.C.C.^.j or Co^bu an orialnal writ of habeas Corpus fo 4be CourY of CrWn\nal Appeals,Ex^arYeS^auldivu^6l2 

### ^>Ai.3d 504 (Tex.Cr.App.\48\\The 'Petitioner feds that hiS best 

### o^ortunifu fo obtain faVr and substantial justice rejaraiv^ Wis bond pev\di\aa appeal Is fWouabi this peyifioi/\j us the procedural remeda" uVdlaed herein has historically s&v\itc\ as
a safefa Aet for those who have had their coiflstlYuYional flabYs violabed. A^GO^EHT 

### "Tbe VeY\Yioner brinaS Us clodvn before the court pursuant 

### fo Tev:.CoieCr'i<n,\)roc.AAA.art. 44.04 ^{ovides that, Thedefe^daAf maanot bereleased on bcvd \>endincx the appeal from ana^ felonaCoAvicticn wbere the punishwefd equals or exceeds \0 aears coinYlaevnenYor where the defendc\iaY V\d* beevn e-onviefed of an ofrense listed (2\uwder Section o^Cc^O^ ArYlcle 43.1^ but shall YfnmecbaYelu be placed 'in cuSToduand the ba'\\ dlscbaraei. Tex/CodeCrim.W. An*, art. M4.04. See aUo Thomas v. StaYe^d S.W. 

### Sd 401 (Tex.App.Corpus CbrisYl 3001\Lebo v. StaYe^O SW~ 3d 

### 3>34(TexXrw.App.W&YThe, ^Wnlan^ua^e of the sfafube In 

### dicated C\ trial '^ud^e was ^roY\lb\Yed ffovn releas'mc^a person on ba'A \^end\v\a ou^aeal ov\\\\ \f Wis punishment equaled or (exceeded Yen uears actual VnpnsonmenY)while those who 

### are placed on ben uears Covnvnunit^ supervision rAxx^ seesk re\ea.se on WA ^endlna apoeal, Lebo, ^0 SMLod at ooO. 

### Adefendant aayadvcaW au'df^ot an offense \A^f\a^«

CANSecb\o\A 14.0^1,VenalCode Gnurder\ QfiSection 14-OS, VenalCode(cqp"da\Murder^ (C\, SecYlon ^\.l\f^CnJ>enalCode(.'waecenaAwith achild\ Cv^ SecY\on 30,04^VenalCode(aaarasraYed\s\dnappV\a\j fe^ SecYv\on 33.02}\)enalCodeCaaafa/cded: sexualassaulY>F 

### OF^ SecY^on 34.0^ \Vna\CodeCaaaravatedrobber^; 

### (CVn^>ecY\on 481^ Cbea\Ynand SateY^ Code\ of tVh S*cA"«ov\ ;&.0l\>\>ena\ Codeise*ua\ a^saul^ 

### ina.v\ not be released on bad pursuant to 7ex.Code Cmi/^.^roc.Am, 

### ArY. mbCC4Co)Cx\G\. See also SkWwr v. Sktt^OOl Tey.App. Lexis U"s5 (Tex.App.TexarkanaYAdenial of a. defendant's request

### Yor an appeal bond upon rev/ocablon of his deferred ad.^uchcadlon Comnun\W Supervision following co/wlcYion tor aaarava\ed 

### Sexual assault was appropriate because under Tex.Code cYin.Vroc. AAA.art. 44.04(b\ a defendant who had been convicted of an Offense under TeK.,Code CrWn.\Voc.Ann. art.43.QyCa^aYC)could not 

### be released on bad 'penchna appeal Id, lebdtoner now asserts that Ybe ivnposlfion of a Yen year SCndence as a result oh \do\cd*on for an wvaWidual w/bo was placed On eiaWY ^AearS of ^shoclc probat\o/\uexceeds Ybe Wi^Yb of scarcerutlon.The YeY\Y\oner Subnets thab he i^ entitled to a Reasonable 

### bond Weause fWre \S no ofufuW^ basis or Waal cause do deiaui hlvn ball, Accord\v\aW, Ybe cWiVns taised below ate aoW 

### properly before this Coutd. The VebiYioner Yherefore respecYfuWi^ TeoiuesYs YbaY Ybe Court bear Ybe claims ftesenled mWs notion and this vV*aora\ndufn of Law. I. THE VETITIOHER IS E^TITUb TO A RFASONAME Wfc 

### Tbe VeYiYioner subwViFo YhaV because heaefvAcdl^ be^an serving
ex worY\on of Us Yen uear senYence( he wouWl be entitledW> boni 

### ^end\na appeal,Conwcted felons are not Guaranteed the riabY Yobad under the Texas Constitution, lex. Const, art helbThe legislature 

### Was,however,CreaYed a CiaVit to bad pend'ma an appeal.Tex.CodeCWi. \Voc.Ann.arY.44.04. Tex. Code Grivn.Woe.Ann. arY. L|4.04(d) renders a defenda^F ineligible Yor bad where Us punishment equals or exceeds

10 uears conY\nevnenY or if the defendanY has been convicted of

an offense listed under lex.Code Cflrr^coc.An/\.art". 43.U, c oaCanCY Tex.CoAe CriM^roc.Ann.ar-Y. 44.04 CdYIa cases where punishr/ie^l is



### \ess Yban \0 ^ears, Ybe Y^ial CourY has discretion Yo set bad or to deiAu it for aood cause upon belief v\\ that the defendanY w/\l\ 

### aoY appear when the conviction became tinah or(3.\that he w\\\ be bWeU to eonrVit another offe/\se wb\W on ball. Iik. Code Cfivn.^roc. Ann.art MM,04CcN, VibeA (x defendanY 'is placed on COYAvnunifa supervisionno 

### sentence has been Imposed. WorfVwvAon v. State,, So S.W.3d o45; 

### S\4(7e^.App.300N(cd^ AnanAo V. SYoAe^S S\d.3dl 330,33/ (Tex.App.\Vn8)\FurVberJ the sentence is \vnposed for +he birsf ti^ie when cow\vv\uaibx supervision is (evoked.Xd. Vjben a court arants shock probation under the provisions 

### of [a^bcle] 43.ITLS^bbnJ 3e. it suspends the execution father

### than Yhe Imposition of the senYence, O'Hara v. S-VaYe.636 S.W, 3d S3/5S (Tex.Crlni.App. l4aM. Tn Ybese circumstances, '4he de 

### fendant acYucdW ser\/es Ov kordion of Yhe sentence.The Canv- 

### \cViv\Q Court fAdu then suspend the CxecovYion of thereroai'Ader of the sentence. Id.IY UlWwSj therefore^ tbat a new 

### SenYence is YNob iraposecl or executed if the probation is re 

### voked, \v\sbead, Yhe suspension of Yhe execuYion offV\e senYewce \s \iffed and the defendant Continues f0 sefve his previously ordered sentence. See Xd A ou^^aWY'iona order Increases Yhe leAoYln of the Yer<n of a SenYe^ce;Yherefore; mYbe contexF of 

### a shock proba.Wo\A revocable^, a CuvnwlaYion order violates Ybe double jeopardo^ clause of bhe rdfdh Amendment bo the United Sbabes, ConstifuWon av\d article I, section 14 of the 

### Texas Consti\uflO\n hu infllcbiw^ additional punishment on a 

### cfefcndanY vjho Was already sbarbed Servi^a asentence, for the same, offense. See Ex parYe leunoUs^W SHSd 605^01 

### (Tey.Cr^.App.\4l0\see also N/aw M^en v. SdaYe^os.Ol-ukul^- 

### CRN0\-0V-O\^^^C^a0O^ Tex.App.aey.s 8581,at*3CTex:App(-Houston Llst^TsC] Ve,5,3002/pet refdN (nen. op.;not desiamYedfor

### pubbcatlond.Accordlnala)under Texas law,'a CourY fAai^ Aof add
a Cu\fnu\abion order onYo a sentence alreadu imposed after a 

### defendant has suffered punishment Uftder bhe sentence as orla\v\a\lu\ Imposed. Such an attempted Cumulation order is fiull and mq\& cmd of iao leaal eftecT. CVHara v. StaYe^G 

### SVJ.3d aY SS. (Quof.nu from SFepWens v.Stede,30\3 Tex.App. Ux\s 1>135\ Ia YWs case Ybe VeYvYioner was senYenced Yo ten uears Inc.arceraYlo^however h'\s sentence was suspended (x^\d ne vnxs placed On five aears comrwAnlfa Supervision o»a danuarvA ^k; 

### 3000 in Case No.FW-2\10<\-rW. SoWquenYlvA, on November \) 3003) the ^eY\Y\oner \nola\ed \pcoWV\on ard was senbenced fo 30 roonbhs State Jail..A ^ud^evnent was entered revok'vAa 

### W\S ^we aear coYnmuniYu oovpeM-vi5\On \v\ CaseN^>.FrV^nOWW. Vlhde servina Us sevnVence fWe ^eYd'\oner was then placed 

### on. cioWY uears sWocW ^robaf\ov\ for Caset4o.F44-3H04-M\A/ 

### Commencing on tAaa IC/D00"o,Thereafter the YVfiYioner was released from Stcde dad on April 38,3004. On fWek 3^005, 

### Yhe VeYifio'Aer Was COirwicYed ofStalking and senbenceddo 0\n\ne uears vncarcerabiom in CaseMo F05-0OO04-IW. On March 35y 

### 3005ja Vud^emenb vvas enbered fevoking Yhe YeYiYionefS shock p^obabiovA and he was sentenced bo \t{\ aears mcarcerabiou \v\ Case Uo. F44-3\10V\V\W. On Yhe sane daa. of rWcb 3S, 3005, dhe \r\al courb added a CurAuUbion order} orderiAa Case rdo. F44-St\l0ci-nvj bo r^ consecutive to Case l4o. F05~0OO0q-TW. Tbis done even fhou&h Yhe 10 uear sentence in CaseMo. F44- 

### SllOVnW Wad beem p>revious>\u^ \rAposed.That sa^e da^ f[ae VflWoner filed a notice of appeal a^ Yo CaseMo.F44-3noVnVv. Tbe \ebibionef asserts tbat be is entitled to bond p^^- 

### dina^ appeal because Wis sentence in CaseMo.FS4-217O^-WW ^is less than ten uears1 confinevnenb. Jht Kbitloners Sentence 

### Was \rnposed for tie. first finne on FtavewWer I, 300^,when his 

### Community supervision Was revoked. A\ that Writhe refitioiAer beaan serv\w\ f-wne on Wis sentence. 'In tact, thePetitionerbad 

### Served afleast ^ uears Tmonths 33 dau^s of his original 

## se\Afe-V\ce as evidenced o^ the fact tnaf he was \no+ placed

on .shock dxobabion until fdau lb, 3003,T/vs total due. to the 

### debaVnvnent for ^YaYedad on tAcx^\k>,3003 until .Aprd 3o,

### 3004 and all presentence hearing \d\l finoe 'HAcUdlna fr-oun 

### September\>3004 WMarch £5,3005 fhe dabe of sentencing a^d addition of Yhe cumulation order with all sentences



### Concurrent up bo YhaY dabe.Since Yhe Vebifioner b^s already 

### Served Wne on his senYence,bis punishment incarcerated11 is Wss tWan den uears. FurYnerrAore Yhe VeY'd^oner believes 

### be Was CompleYed Us ^entencefs'N dau for dau as of AuausY 

### 34,^013. VeYibioner also beheves. pucsuaAb to the findings of •\b\s Court \v\ W\s Oricunal App\icaf\on For VJcitof lAandawus YhaY a consfifubional riabb Was violated QAd relief will be. aranted due to fhe Flea ?sarqa\\a AareevneAd Vn Case tdo. F44-^IT04-FAW- which clearL shows no cumulation order 

### Wa^ aar^d upon on January 0G>( 3000.Therefore,the Vefitioner request that bail be set pursuant to Tex.Code Crirv^fVoc.Ann.art, 44.04 COtACLUSTOM 

### For the abov/e sbaVed reasons; fVtibioner respectfully requesYs YhaY YW\S honorable CourY Yo find that Ybe FetifioAer 

### Is ella'ible bo^ bor>d ^endW\<^ appeal.

### ftespecYYulli^Submibed, 

### {foeTrampcxs"Wvavides^18J3.0S3

\betaYorJVeYitionertrco 3e Cleme/ifs Oi/iit S(pO\ Spur 541 AmarilU,Texas T^lOl

CF&TTFICATE OF SERVICE 

### T hereba eerYifu YWaV a \v\a<l and accurate copu^ of YhiS document has been sent b^ CerYlfied O.S,Had On this the £J/i aaa of danuaru 3015 to the iVesidiM 

### Judaei3(*3>rd Judicial VvsYrlcf Court of ballas,WalUs" 

### Cow\W Texas, \33 M. Riverfront loVd. 5th Floor,Dallas
Texas "15301
Case ^/i^rpjvol^^uiJL, u

00). Joe Tra^pcv's 'fceA&vide."S ^/o^0°/3> Relator/Petitioner , Pco SeIVb TWt COORX OF CfclVtfttAL AWEAIS OF TEXAS

AT AUSTIN TEXAS

JOE TRAWAS IsEUAMlbFS Trial Court i\k>.F44-3noq-rw TbCd-Ilo Mo.0lS\3043 

### delatorI WH-7(b,4o>03 GvtlFoner^

V, 3G3rd dOblCXAl blST^ICT COOkT OF DALLAS ,DALLAS COOUTV TEXAS HespoAtlevd. fnOTIOU FOR UHCH WARRANT TO THE UOMOkAM JUbdE OF SAlfc COURT" 

### COWES FlOW,doeTrampasVAavideSjWrYdione^j^oSe In Ybe above staled and numbered Cause and states- 

### (Au name \S doeTrampas ^benavidesW^efitloners,^ offender dumber \s". 0184304.3.1 am competent Yo make Ybis afficlav/Y. -^ a^ presenYU w\carceraYea )v\ the qA\ Cle^e^ts Unit located at 90>OI 

### Spur 541, Anardlo, Texas 14101. X request the Court to Issue C\ \Tar^aAf from the Dench ordering the Sheriff of t)odW County,

xdo transport me to the S(»3rd dudicial WisYrl^Y Court of ua11as in 

### Wallas Countix Texas for hear\na \wYhis maWer so Yhat I wa^ give TesYlmoAOj re^ard'»Aa appea.1 bond.
HAVEk 

### VeY'dloner respectfully prai^S tbcd this Court grant fUs motiou and order Yhe Sheriff of Wallas County dotranspo^Y ^eYiYloner Yo the bearina of thl is cause. 

### Wes-pecffull^ Submitted,

Vet'.Yiofiec, Pro Sle doe Trampas Wenavlde^^181^0^3 Clements Ori'if 40>Q\ Spur 541 

### Amarillo/Tx. 14101

HIH TUF COURT Or CKLNIHAL AFPEAFS OF TEXAS

AT AUSTIN TEXAS

•dOF TKAH^AS ^bE^AMI^S TbCd-Ib Uo.0\&\3043 

### kelaYorl Wk~l6,4&l-OS CWY'dlonebYj

V. 3G3fd uOblClAF blSTRICT COOR.T OF DALLAS, DALLAS
COUNTS TEXAS Kespondent.
OW>£fc 

## On YUs fhe daa^ of 3015,cameon fo beWeard Ybe defendants Request f0f 'Wench Warrant anol after clue Cons'\de\rad\on of the sarne VV is, 

### ORbEte^ that the Wefenda^W reauest for ahearing is 

## (GKAUTE^uJ^EHTEA^and thab sa\cl Cause is set forheariv^ on Ybe da^ of ^30l5\and \\ is furfbe^

HI Tna\ CourV Ho.F44-anoq-nWOR£>E^E\o YbaY fbe defendant's request (or be/icb warrant 

### \S (G^AMTFb/WEHlE^i and Ybe Cled< of fbe Court notify saU

iSefeadanf reaard'Wxcx Yhe WencW Warrant of the Defendant to 

### tbib County for sa\d driab

JUloGF PkFSlMUG

E