alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24
 
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
 
    WHEREAS, U S WEST Communications, Inc., a Colorado corporation (hereinafter
referred to as the "Company"), proposes to file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, an annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1996; and
 
    WHEREAS, the undersigned is an officer or Director, or both, of the Company,
and holds the office or offices indicated below his name;
 
    NOW THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints MICHAEL P.
GLINSKY and STEPHEN E. BRILZ, and each of them, as attorneys for him and in his
name, place, and stead, and in each of his offices and capacities in the
Company, to execute and file such annual report, and thereafter to execute and
file any amendment or amendments thereto on Form 10-K/A, hereby giving and
granting to said attorneys full power and authority to do and perform all and
every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and about
the premises as fully, to all intents and purposes, as he might or could do if
personally present at the doing thereof, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorneys may or shall lawfully do, or cause to be done, by virtue
hereof.
 
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto executed this Power of
Attorney this 28th day of March, 1997.
 
                                          /s/ SOLOMON D. TRUJILLO
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Solomon D. Trujillo
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          and
                                          Director
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
March 14, 2008

| |  | /s/GLENN M. DOBBSGlenn M. Dobbs
Chief Executive Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mines Management, Inc. and will be retained by Mines Management, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         422,118
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  814,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (30,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,961,428
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,417,644
<PP&E>                                       8,814,216
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,047,281)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,125,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,677,388
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,781,256
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,125,147
<SALES>                                      1,342,137
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,342,137
<CGS>                                          711,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  711,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               567,541
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             125,857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (55,181)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (55,181)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (55,181)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in this registration statement on Form S-3, to be
filed on or around June 15, 1998, of our reports dated February 20, 1997, on the
Consolidated Financial Statements of MFS Communications Company, Inc. included
in WorldCom, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 25, 1996, as amended
by Form 8-K/A filed on December 19, 1997, and to all references to our Firm
included in this registration statement.

                                                         ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Omaha, Nebraska,
June 12, 1998.
#### John W. CONLEY, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 99-7177.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 19, 2001.

ON MOTION

ORDER

John W. Conley moves to voluntarily dismiss his appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) The revised official caption is reflected above.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                     [CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC. LETTERHEAD]


                                  May 26, 1998

Brigham Exploration Company
6300 Bridge Point Parkway
Building Two, Suite 500
Austin, Texas  78730

Gentlemen:

     In connection with the offering of shares of common stock, par value $.01
per share ("Common Stock"), of Brigham Exploration Company (the "Company"), we
delivered a letter dated May 26, 1998 to you with respect to an estimate of the
reserves, future production and income attributable to certain interests of the
Company, as of December 31, 1997.

     We understand that you intend that our letter be included in a Registration
Statement on Form S-1 and any amendments thereto, as well as a Prospectus to be
provided to potential purchasers of Common Stock, and we hereby consent to such
use. We also consent to the references in the Registration Statement on Form
S-1 or Prospectus to our firm and to the information provided therein.


                                        Yours very truly,
 
                                        Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.


                                        /s/ AARON CAWLEY
                                        Aaron Cawley, P.E.
                                        Executive Vice President
#### Dinsmore *v.*Holcomb.

Hill, J.

1. Considered in connection with the allegations of the petition as amended, as to description of the land sought to be recovered, the last amendment substituting the lot No. 697 for the lot No. 696 was not demurrable upon the ground that it added a new cause of action. Powell on Actions for Land, § 115; *Venable*v. *Burton,*118 *Ga.*156 (45 S. E. 29); P*olhill*v. *Brown,*84 *Ga.*338 (10 S. E. 921).

2. The action being complaint for land, brought in conformity to the pleading act of 1893 (Acts 1893, p. 56), Civil Code (1910), § 5539, and the defendant in his answer having disclaimed title or possession, and the court having charged to the jury the provisions of the Civil Code (1910), § 4166; if the defendant was entitled to instructions in *regard*to his contention that “he and his predecessors in title had been in the actual, open, and notorious possession of the strip of land in controversy for a number of years amounting to more than ten years before the bringing of this suit, amounting, as defendant contends, to 35 years continued possession evidenced by cultivation and other acts of ownership,” and if the defendant was entitled to an instruction that “constructive possession,” such as was defined by the judge in his charge, “would not overcome actual and adverse possession such as the defendant contended that he had had, and under which he had held the land in controversy for a long period of time before the filing of this suit,” and as to defendant’s contention that “his possession was such that constructive possession on the part of the plaintiff should not extend to and take effect on the strip of land in controversy and defeat, the defendant’s rights which he might acquire by virtue of his actual possession of the property,” a reversal will not be ordered on account of failure to charge specifically as to either of such contentions, in the absence of timely and appropriate written requests for instructions on those subjects.

3. The petition as amended was a suit for a strip of land in lot No. 697 west of Little River, containing about one acre as included in petitioner’s entire tract of 70 acres, more or less. There was a general verdict for the plaintiff. The decree did not accurately describe the land in controversy, and purported to give an indefinite description of plaintiff’s entire lot. The verdict is to be construed as referring to the land in controversy as described in the petition as amended, and not *21to include the plaintiff’s entire tract. The decree should be no broader than the verdict as thus construed; but as its terms will not extend to any land claimed by the defendant that was not involved in the suit, the inaccuracy in the decree will not furnish any ground of exception to its terms, or authorize a reversal.

No. 6318.

September 14, 1928.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*22
      *J. P.*Broolce, for plaintiff in error.

*G. B. Walker*and *II. B.*Moss, contra.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          77,588
<SECURITIES>                                   148,343
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,038
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,732)
<INVENTORY>                                     11,070
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               310,354
<PP&E>                                          13,308
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,799)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 323,523
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,548
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           642
<OTHER-SE>                                     272,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   323,523
<SALES>                                         50,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               196,120
<CGS>                                           40,573
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   127
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                110,001
<INCOME-TAX>                                    44,001
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             66,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    66,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.97


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 23(a)


               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants




Voice Control Systems, Inc.
Dallas, Texas

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8, pertaining to the PureSpeech 1997 Stock Option Plan and
PureSpeech Key Employee Stock Option Plan, of our report dated January 30,
1998, relating to the financial statements of Voice Control Systems, Inc.
appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 1997.


                                                     /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP



Dallas, Texas
June 2, 1998
**Exhibit 31.A**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Stephen C. Beasley, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of ANR PipelineCompany;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 15, 2005 /s/ Stephen C. Beasley   Stephen C. Beasley   Chairman of the Board and President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KHYLIL HODGE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 264 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of November, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Please Note..

This webinar and the engagement tools will be recorded.

An archive will be available on the event website. 

1
Cultivating Cybersecurity 

Leaders: The New Cybersecurity 

Career Ambassador Program

October 18, 2023
Jasmine M. 

Jackson

Alma Maria 

Rinasz

Tish DeVere Karl 

Cureton

3
Q&A

4
Submit an event survey!

surveymonkey.com/r/CybersecurityAmbassadorWebinar
NICE Webinar Series & Special Events

Cybersecurity Paths and Ladders Webinar

(October 19, 2023, 2:00-3:00PM ET)

Cybersecurity Apprenticeship Programs that 

Incorporate an Academic Degree

(November 15, 2023, 2:00-3:00PM ET)

nist.gov/nice/webinars 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-01-1998
<CASH>                                       2,316,000
<SECURITIES>                                   102,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    325,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,974,000
<PP&E>                                      27,033,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,934,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,110,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,020,000
<BONDS>                                     12,834,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,226,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,110,000
<SALES>                                     38,868,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,868,000
<CGS>                                       22,715,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               38,355,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,390,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (914,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (928,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (928,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Anthony E. Applebaum, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and

6. The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  March 11, 2009                                          
|                                                               
|/s/ ANTHONY E. APPLEBAUM                                       
|Anthony E. Applebaum
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
|
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 426 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 426

   To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from requiring 
           digital television tuners in television receivers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2003

 Mr. Sensenbrenner (for himself, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Paul, Mr. 
  Cox, and Mr. Frank of Massachusetts) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from requiring 
           digital television tuners in television receivers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``TV Consumer Choice Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING DIGITAL TELEVISION TUNERS IN 
              TELEVISION RECEIVERS.

    (a) Prohibition.--Neither section 303(s) of the Communications Act 
of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 303(s)) nor any other provision of such Act shall be 
construed to authorize the Federal Communications Commission to 
require, or prescribe any schedule for the implementation of, digital 
television reception capability in television broadcast reception 
equipment.
    (b) Commission Actions Nullified.--The requirements and schedule 
established by the Commission for the implementation of digital 
television reception capability in television broadcast reception 
equipment as contained in section 15.117(i) of the Commission's 
regulations (47 CFR 15.117(i)) as modified in FCC 02-230 (August 8, 
2002), shall not be effective except as expressly hereafter provided by 
Act of Congress.
                                 <all>
```