alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James W. Bernau, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Willamette Valley
Vineyards Inc.

Date: May 15, 2007
By:	 /s/ James W. Bernau
Name: James W. Bernau
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32-14 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Michigan Consolidated Gas Company (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David E. Meador, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 15, 2005
    /s/ DAVID E. MEADORDavid E. MeadorExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of
Michigan Consolidated Gas Company A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
National Advisory Committee on Windstorm Impact 

Reduction (NACWIR) Member 

 

 

Katherine H. Greig, MBA, MALD

Deputy Director of Policy

New York City Mayors Office of Recovery and 

Resiliency

Ms. Greig’s expertise is in climate resilience and risk 

mitigation policy and planning. She holds a Master of 

Arts in Law and Diplomacy from Tufts University and a 

Master of Business Administration from Dartmouth 

College. Ms. Greig’s experience implementing local 

resiliency policies and projects in a dense urban environment 

combine to allow for a unique perspective on turning windstorm science and engineering into 

policies and plans to help save lives and reduce property damage. 

Ms. Greig is the Deputy Director for Policy-Buildings, in the NYC Mayor’s Office of Recovery 

and Resiliency, where she coordinates a $3.5B resiliency budget across many city agencies to 

make NYC’s building stock more resilient to climate change and flood events. She is NYC’s 

point-of-contact for the NYC Panel on Climate Change, and leads NYC’s public and interagency 

outreach on climate change, risk exposure, and flood insurance changes.

Ms. Greig also worked as Senior Policy Advisor for the White House Hurricane Sandy 

Rebuilding Task Force. She led the development of the National Flood Insurance Programrelated recommendations in a strategy document the Task Force submitted to the President. She 

also worked across agencies, for example with the Department of Housing and Urban 

Development, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to build support for 

those recommendations.

Prior to working in the field of disaster risk mitigation and resiliency, she worked as a consultant 

with the Boston Consulting Group where she led a variety of strategy projects for a diverse range 

of companies in NYC and internationally.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BEATRIZ CHALMETA a/k/a BEATRIZ ELENA CHALMETA and

JULIO CHA LMETA

, Appellant s

,

v.

WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, F.S.B. f/k/a WORLD SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B.

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3493

[ January 15, 2020 ]

Appeal of nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barry Stone

, Senior Judge; L.T. Case

No. CACE 09

- 063847

.

Beatriz Chalmeta a/k/a Beatriz Elena Chalmeta and Julio Chalmeta,

Weston, pro se.

No app earance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. Fla. R. App. P. 9

. 315(a).

G ROSS

, G ERBER and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4401

To suspend temporarily the duty on 9,10-Anthracenedione, 1,8-dihydroxy4-nitro-5-(phenylamino)-; 9,10-Anthracenedione, 1,5-dihydroxy-4-nitro-8-

(phenylamino)-. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2004

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 9,10-Anthracenedione, 

1,8-dihydroxy-4-nitro-5-(phenylamino)-; 9,10-

Anthracenedione, 1,5-dihydroxy-4-nitro-8-(phenylamino)-.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:
2

•HR 4401 IH 

‘‘ 9902.01.01 9,10-Anthracenedione, 1,8-

dihydroxy-4-nitro-5-

(phenylamino)-; 9,10-

Anthracenedione, 1,5-

dihydroxy-4-nitro-8-

(phenylamino)- (CAS Nos. 

20241–76–3 and 3065–87–

0) (provided for in subheading 3204.11.35) ............ Free Free No change 12/31/07 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### Deffenbaugh *v.*Foster.

*City.—Street Improvements.—Assignment of Contract.—Consent op*City.— Where a contract for a street improvement in a city contains a provision that the contract shall not be assigned without the consent of the common council, no one besides the contractor can maintain an action on a precept issued to *383such contractor, upon an allegation that he'has done the work by agreement with the contractor, without an averment also of the assignment of the contract by the consent of the council.

APPEAL from the Howard Common Pleas.

Pettit, C. J.

This was an appeal from a precept issued by the common council of the city of Kokomo against the appellee, in favor of one Davis, the contractor, for street improvement in front of appellee’s property.

Davis was the bidder and contractor for the work, and gave the bond; he made the affidavit for the precept, and it issued in his name against Foster, a property holder. In the common pleas court the case was docketed, “ *'Foster*v. *Deffenbaugh."*On the second day of the term Deffenbaugh had Foster defaulted, and took judgment in his favor for the amount of the precept against Foster, and an order for the sale of his land. On a subsequent day of the term Foster appeared and moved the court to set aside the default and judgment against him, because Deffenbaugh had no complaint or right of action in court against him. This motion was properly sustained.

Thereupon Deffenbaugh filed what is called an amended complaint; the original and only complaint was and must be the proceedings of the council, the acts of the contractor and the city officers. This amended complaint by Deffenbaugh says that he did the work by agreement with Davis, and is entitled to the pay for it, and asks that he be allowed to prosecute the suit for his benefit against Foster. In the contract of Davis with the city, this provision is contained : “ It is hereby expressly understood that no assignment of this contract shall be made to any other party without the consent of the common council.”

The so called amended complaint does not state that the contract was assigned to Deffenbaugh, either with or without the consent of the council.

There was a demurrer to this amended complaint, for want of sufficient facts, sustained.

There was no error in this ruling. The contract was not *384assigned, nor could it be without the consent of the council, and Deffenbaugh had no right, in this proceeding, to come in and demand a judgment against Foster.

*C. N. Pollard,*for appellant.

*C. D. Murray*and *M. Garrigus,*for appellee.

By the provision in the contract, against its assignment, the city and the property owner are alike secured and protected against improper and unfaithful substitutes for the original contractor.

Deffenbaugh having no right or cause-of action in this case, judgment for costs was properly rendered against him. This does not affect the right of Davis under the precept.

The judgment is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant*

*

Petition for a rehearing overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>  0001067541
<NAME>  Home Interiors & Gifts, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
<CURRENCY> USDOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          23,938
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,683
<ALLOWANCES>                                       251
<INVENTORY>                                     38,786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,392
<PP&E>                                          56,431
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,053
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,219
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,523
<OTHER-SE>                                   (445,680)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   116,463
<SALES>                                        236,073
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               236,073
<CGS>                                          116,087
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  190,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (4,654)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,759
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,570
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,189
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,189
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
10603.

#### Howard *v.*The State.

Decided July 23, 1919.

Indictment for burglary; from Whitñeld superior court—Judge Tarver. May 5,1919.

Howard ivas convicted of burglary, under an indictment which charged him with having broken and entered the store-house of Wood *So*McDonald and stolen certain articles therefrom. The testimony relied on to show a breaking and entering of the storehouse was that of McDonald, one of the proprietors of the store. He testified: *“I*closed up that night. I locked up as usual. There are two doors to the store. I barred the back door with a crossbar. There ivas a glass front to the store. There was one rear window. It had bars across it, and ivas fastened down lower. It had iron bars on the inside. One could have broken the glass in the front door and reached in and unlocked the lock. The front door was a glass door. There was a Yale lock on that front door,— *145had a thumb screw in it.” “That store was burned about two o’clock in the morning.. It was some time aiter two when they woke me up. . . When I got down there the house was practically burned up; it was all fell in and in flames all over.” Certain articles found in and near the defendant’s home, of the kind described'in the indictment, were identified by the witness as articles from the stock of goods in the store-house. It was testified that the article found in the defendant’s house had been found by his son under the corner of a store-house near the burned store-house “about daylight” in the morning after the fire, and brought to his house without his knowledge. Counsel for the defendant contended that a breaking and entering had not been shown by the evidence, and in their brief in this court cited *Lester*v. *State,*106 *Ga.*371.

*144Broyles, P. J.

In this case the record discloses no evidence which authorized the defendant’s conviction of the offense of burglary, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.*

*145IF. *F. Mann, Gordon Mann, George G. Glenn, Ralph II. Mouse,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. M. Lang, solicitor-general,*contra.
**Exhibit14**

 

**MESABITRUST**

**TRUSTEESCODE OF ETHICS**

 

This Trustees Code of Ethics for Mesabi Trust (the“Trust”) has been adopted by the Trustees of the Trust (the “Trustees”) topromote honest and ethical conduct, proper disclosure of financial informationin the Trust’s periodic reports and compliance with applicable laws, rules andregulations.  This Code applies to theTrustees, who in turn expect all agents, advisors and consultants of the Trustto adhere to the Code’s principles.

 

All Trustees shall:

 

•                  Acthonestly and ethically in the performance of their duties to the Trust.

•                  Avoidactual or apparent conflicts of personal interests and the interests of theTrust.

•                  Providefull, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documentsthat the Trust files with, or submits to, the SEC and in other publiccommunications by the Trust.

•                  Complyand take all reasonable actions to cause others to comply with applicable rulesand regulations of federal, state and local governments and other private andpublic regulatory agencies as they apply to the Trust.

•                  Promptlybring to the attention of the remaining Trustees any information concerning:

•                  significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the Trust’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data;

•                  anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves anyone who has a significant rolein the Trust’s financial reporting disclosures or internal controls; or

•                  anyviolation of this Code by any Trustee or by any agent, advisor or consultant ofthe Trust.

 

Any individual who believes there has been a violationof applicable law involving the Trust or this Code should report the matterimmediately to at least two (2) Trustees so that a proper investigation can beconducted.  The written report can besent via first class mail or other direct delivery means and it may be reportedin an anonymous writing that is not signed by the individual.

 

Any violation of this Code by any Trustee, includingthe failure to report potential violations by others, may subject the Trusteeto appropriate action.  Any violation ofthis Code by any agent, advisor or consultant of the Trust may result indisciplinary action, up to and including termination of such individual’srelationship with the Trust as well as potential legal action.

 

The Trustees shall consider any request for a waiverof this Code and any amendments to this Code and all such waivers or amendmentsshall be disclosed promptly as required by law or SEC regulation.

 

----
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income  Fund V, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30,  2003 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





Date:   August 8, 2003                      /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                            Title: Chief Executive Officer


                                            A signed  original  of this  written
                                            statement  required  by Section  906
                                            has been provided to CNL Income Fund
                                            V, Ltd.  and will be retained by CNL
                                            Income Fund V, Ltd. and furnished to
                                            the    Securities    and    Exchange
                                            Commission   or   its   staff   upon
                                            request.
Exhibit 23
                                                                               
                                                                               
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                                       
                                       
      As   independent  public  accountants,  we  hereby  consent  to  the
   incorporation  by  reference  of our report  dated  January  21,  1999,
   included  in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998,  into
   Michigan   Bell  Telephone  Company's  previously  filed   Registration
   Statement File No. 33-51169.
   
      
      
      
      
   
   
   
   ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
   
   
   Chicago, Illinois
   March 29, 1999
EXHIBIT 4.21


 


Deed of settlement and release – Mr Christopher D
Lewis


 


The
deed of settlement and release of Mr Christopher D Lewis is incorporated by
reference to National Australia Bank Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Commission
on January 20, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>    1
       
<S>                                           <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                Jul-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                  Sep-30-1995
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<CASH>                                            311,869
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     234,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  550,711
<PP&E>                                          9,503,731
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,358,534
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  9,518,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             388,741
<BONDS>                                         4,827,448
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                      2,692,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    9,518,684
<SALES>                                           482,847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  484,328
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     203,075
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   76,491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                118,038
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    36,586
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                36,586
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       36,586
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        

</TABLE>
# Version

# s(b) K-factors

# Effective CCE & Density

# Meas Assurance Data Example

# s(t) Chart

# s(w) Chart

# Chk vs Humidity

# Chk vs Pressure

# Chk vs Temperature

# MBD000868AD.unknown

# MBD000EA838.unknown

# MBD000EF92F.unknown

# MBD000C634D.unknown

# MBD000CA03A.unknown

# MBD000A98C7
* TheHonorable Pasco M. Bowman stepped down as Chief Judge of the United

States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit at the end of the day on April 23, 1999. He has been succeeded by the Honorable Roger L. Wollman.

** TheHonorable Andrew W. Bogue, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3832

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District v. * of Nebraska. * Andrew Scott Walters, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 20, 1999

Filed: April 28, 1999

___________ Before BOWMAN, * Chief Judge, FAGG, Circuit Judge, and BOGUE, ** District Judge.

___________ PER CURIAM. Andrew Scott Walters appeals his drug-related conviction and sentence. Having carefully reviewed the record, we reject Walters's contentions. First, the record contains substantial evidence on which the jury could have found Walters guilty.-2-

Second, the district court correctly determined Walters's guidelines sentence. We thus affirm Waters's conviction and sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Computer Security 

Matthew Scholl, Division Chief

Information Access 

Mark Przybocki, Division Chief

Software and Systems 

Ram Sriram, Division Chief

Statistical Engineering 

William Guthrie, Division Chief

Applied Cybersecurity 

Kevin Stine, Division Chief

Applied & Computational Mathematics

Ronald Boisvert, Division Chief

Office of Chief Cybersecurity Advisor

Kevin Stine, Assoc. Director

Office of Govt & Industrial Liaison

Kamie Roberts, Assoc. Director

Office Of Computational Science for

Metrology

Ronald Boisvert, Assoc. Director (Acting)

Office of IT Standardization

Adam Sedgewick, Assoc. Director (Acting)

Office of Emerging Technologies

Elham Tabassi, Assoc. Director

James St. Pierre

Director(Acting), Information Technology Laboratory

Kamie Roberts, Deputy Director (Acting)

Executive Office

Susan Loar

Chief of Staff

Vacant

Susan Loar

Assistant Director for Boulder (Acting)

Bradley Alpert