-

= =

Vendor H- VISIT_POE Left Index 

threshold 40 (far,tar) (0.00128049,0.990833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00168148 0.000852968 0.00135961 0.00172669 0.00132671 

TAR 0.997288 0.997569 0.995358 0.97351 0.869863 

Figure 1. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset VISIT_POE - Left Index 
 

-

threshold 30 (far,tar) (0.00118981,0.992) = =

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0016206 0.000804805 0.00128666 0.00164399 0.00183364 

TAR 0.995575 0.995245 0.993461 0.97479 0.916667 

Vendor H- VISIT_POE Right Index 

Figure 2. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset VISIT_POE - Right Index 
 

threshold 40 (far,tar) = =(0.00110552,0.9905) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00119539 0.000845797 0.00111146 0.00122052 0.00143758 

TAR 0.996475 0.993823 0.995394 0.977401 0.887218 

Vendor H-VIST_POE_BVA - Left Index 

Figure 3. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset VISIT_POE_BVA - Left Index 
 

-

threshold 30 (far,tar) (0.00106009,0.995333) = =

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00122404 0.000755488 0.00109427 0.00133363 0.00195656 

TAR 0.996847 0.997732 0.996098 0.990991 0.929293 

Vendor H- VISIT_POE_BVA Right Index 

Figure 4. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset VISIT_POE_BVA - Right Index 
 

threshold 30 (far,tar) (0.00118728,0.988333) = =

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.000903474 0.00113755 0.00101202 0.0013591 0.00262947 

TAR 0.999262 0.998914 0.998881 0.988701 0.818548 

Vendor H- BEN- Left Index 

Figure 5. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset BEN - Left Index 
 

threshold 20 (far,tar) (0.00139657,0.995167) = =

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00104681 0.00123013 0.00128132 0.00138623 0.00330611 

TAR 0.999357 1 0.997368 0.992481 0.895062 

Vendor H- BEN- Right Index 

Figure 6. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset BEN - Right Index 
 

threshold 20 (far,tar) (0.00168809,0.996833) = =

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00113274 0.00111759 0.00152642 0.00239878 0.00902883 

TAR 0.999193 0.999064 1 0.994505 0.868852 

Vendor H- BEN- Left Thumb 

Figure 7. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset BEN - Left Thumb 
 

threshold 10 (far,tar) (0.00360507,0.998333) = =

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00212022 0.00223694 0.00328519 0.0082642 0.0156534 

TAR 0.999581 0.999072 1 0.993197 0.936508 

Vendor H- BEN- Right Thumb 

Figure 8. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset BEN - Right Thumb 
 

-

threshold 40 (far,tar) (0.00123279,0.969833) = =

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.000715985 0.000586781 0.00111089 0.00176679 0.00233959 

TAR 0.997788 0.997959 0.991272 0.972112 0.765166 

Vendor H- DHS10 Left Index 

Figure 9. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset DHS10- Left Index 
 

-

threshold 30 (far,tar) (0.0014204,0.965833) = =

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.000918979 0.000892077 0.00133154 0.00182996 0.00284233 

TAR 0.993711 0.993769 0.98519 0.951691 0.787321 

Vendor H- DHS10 Right Index 

Figure 10. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset DHS10 - Right Index 
 

-

threshold 40 (far,tar) (0.00129769,0.983667) = =

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.000386548 0.000420118 0.00139054 0.00302454 0.00737466 

TAR 0.99919 0.996809 0.988435 0.967611 0.796992 

Vendor H- DHS10 Left Thumb 

Figure 11. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset DHS10- Left Thumb 
 

-

threshold 20 (far,tar) (0.00165722,0.983667) = =

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.000594841 0.000558251 0.00186781 0.00382855 0.00875797 

TAR 0.997002 0.99717 0.987267 0.95288 0.796875 

Vendor H- DHS10 Right Thumb 

Figure 12. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset DHS10 - Right Thumb 
 

-

threshold 40 (far,tar) (0.00128324,0.984833) = =

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.000923103 0.000868368 0.00133737 0.00186467 0.00234394 

TAR 0.997409 0.998805 0.992361 0.986842 0.830189 

Vendor H- TXDPS Left Index 

Figure 13. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset TXDPS - Left Index 
 

-

threshold 30 (far,tar) = =(0.00139468,0.9885) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.000854836 0.00104654 0.00144864 0.00206102 0.00270878 

TAR 0.997666 0.996862 0.992151 0.993865 0.831522 

Vendor H- TXDPS Right Index 

Figure 14. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset TXDPS - Right Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor H- TXDPS Left Thumb 

threshold 30 (far,tar) (0.00138854,0.990167) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.000673031 0.000575483 0.00170272 0.00396085 0.00773658 

TAR 0.99586 0.996881 0.989733 0.981481 0.823529 

Figure 15. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset TXDPS - Left Thumb 
 

-

threshold 20 (far,tar) (0.00109891,0.993) = =

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.000607301 0.000540926 0.00141113 0.00380017 0.00465554 

TAR 0.996678 0.996121 0.994595 0.978417 0.785714 

Vendor H- TXDPS Right Thumb 

Figure 16. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset TXDPS - Right Thumb 
 

-

threshold 40 (far,tar) (0.00121173,0.983333) = =

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00170383 0.000887055 0.00135326 0.001358 0.00177342 

TAR 0.995981 0.99559 0.989637 0.961538 0.811881 

Vendor H- DOS C- Left Index 

Figure 17. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset DOS-C - Left Index 
 

-

threshold 30 (far,tar) (0.00108882,0.993167) = =

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00141371 0.000802113 0.00129212 0.00178144 0.00184155 

TAR 0.997779 0.998601 0.997245 0.957143 0.847222 

Vendor H- DOS C- Right Index 

Figure 18. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset DOS-C - Right Index 
 

-

threshold 60 (far,tar) (0.00126202,0.983526) = =

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00124132 0.000915233 0.00137946 0.0020041 0.0015723 

TAR 0.997965 0.984697 0.982558 1 0.948207 

Vendor H- DHS2 C- Left Index 

Figure 19. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset DHS2-C - Left Index 
 

-

threshold 60 (far,tar) (0.0010464,0.982507) = =

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.000823901 0.000846136 0.00119149 0.00130117 0.00180142 

TAR 0.998805 0.988649 0.989094 0.977273 0.921053 

Vendor H- DHS2 C- Right Index 

Figure 20. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor H - Dataset DHS2-C - Right Index