alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, M. G. Duncan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Milastar Corporation and Subsidiary;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: July 28, 2004/s/ M. G. DUNCANM. G. DuncanChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER and PRINCIPAL
       FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
          OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Everest Fund, L.P.
(the "Partnership"), for the quarter ended June 30, 2009,
as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Lamoureux, President
of Everest Asset Management, Inc., the general partner of
the Everest Fund, L.P. (the "Fund"), hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Fund.


      By:  /s/ Peter Lamoureux
         ----------------------
      Name: 	Peter Lamoureux
      Title: 	Director, President and
      		Treasurer

      August 14, 2009


		E-3
Exhibit 4.7
 



 


HIBERNIA CORPORATION


BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTIONS


Approval of Amendment to 1993 Director Stock Option Plan


 


Whereas, Hibernia Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the 1993 Director Stock Option Plan, which plan was first approved by the shareholders of the Company on April 27, 1993 (the “Plan”);


 


Whereas, the Company has entered into that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of March 6, 2005 (the “Merger Agreement”) by and between the Company and Capital One Financial Corporation (“Capital One”), pursuant to which the Company has agreed to merge with and into Capital One (the “Merger”);


 


Whereas, the Company and Capital One expect the Merger to be effective September 1, 2005 (such date, or such later date on which the Merger becomes effective, the “Effective Time”);


 


Whereas, the Board of Directors has determined that certain actions must be taken to address the Merger and the transactions contemplated thereby and section 9 of the Plan contemplates such actions;


 


Whereas, the Board of Directors has determined that under the terms of the Plan, it may act in lieu of the Board Governance Committee;


 


Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved, that on and after the Effective Time, references to Common Stock contained in the Plan or any grant or award thereunder shall be deemed to refer to $0.01 par value per share common stock issued by Capital One (“Capital One Stock”); and


 


Further Resolved, that, in accordance with section 9 of the Plan, the number of shares of Common Stock subject to an Option (as defined in the Plan) granted thereunder outstanding as of the Effective Time shall be converted to an option to purchase the number of shares of Capital One Stock, on the same terms and conditions as applied immediately prior to such time, determined as the product, rounded down to the nearest whole share, of (a) the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of such Option immediately prior to the Effective Time, multiplied by (b) the Exchange Ratio (as defined in the Merger Agreement). The per share exercise price thereof shall equal the result, rounded up to the nearest whole penny, obtained by dividing (x) the per share exercise price of each such Option immediately prior to the Effective Time, by (y) such Exchange Ratio; and


 


Further Resolved, that no additional Options shall be granted or awarded under the Plan; and


 


Further Resolved, that the appropriate officers of this Company are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to take any and all actions, to prepare, execute and file such documents, to enter into such agreements with such persons, and to take any and all other actions which they, 


in their sole discretion, shall deem necessary or advisable in order to accomplish the purposes and intents of the foregoing resolutions; and


 


Further Resolved, that all actions heretofore taken by the officers of the Company with respect to the Plan that would have been authorized by these resolutions, if taken after their adoption, are hereby ratified and confirmed.
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, dirName) # dirName = location where the files listed here are located

class MiscUnc():
    '''Uncertainty calculations for power measurements.'''
    # List of power measurements that do not use a CT (current transducer)
    noCT = ['oau_fan_power','ahu1_fan_power','ahu2_fan_power','exf1_fan_power','exf2_fan_power',
            'pump1_power','pump2_power','pump3_power','pump4_power','pump5_power']
    # List of power measurements that are taken at a faster sample rate than other power measurements and then 
    # integrated to return the power use over a 9 second interval
    fast = ['ahu1_heat_power','ahu2_heat_power','vav1_heat_power','vav2_heat_power','vav3_heat_power',
            'vav4_heat_power','zs1_heat_power','zs2_heat_power','zs3_heat_power','zs4_heat_power']
    def uPowerV(self,df,mData,pn):
        '''Calculate the measurement uncertainty of the power measurement in V. pn is the specific sensor, such as
           oau_fan_power. mData is the metadata file.'''
        # Get the measurements
        P = df[pn] # W
        # Get the scaling coefficients for that measurement
        a0 = float(mData.loc[pn].scaling_coeff_a0) # W
        a1 = float(mData.loc[pn].scaling_coeff_a1) # W/V
        V = (P-a0)/a1 # Calculate the raw voltage from the value P in W using the scaling coefficients
        if pn in MiscUnc.fast:
            # The measurement is in the fast category
            V = V/9 # the V calculated is the integrated V; I want to calculate the uncertainty per each
                    # individual voltage measurement, not the integrated measurement. That's accounted for in the
                    # overall uncertainty 
        if pn in MiscUnc.noCT:
            # The measurement is in the noCT category, so the manufacturer uncertainty is different
            uManuf = 0.002*V
        else:
            uManuf = 0.0047*V
        uCard = 0.00246 # V, the measurement uncertainty of the DAQ card, PXIe-4300
        uV = np.sqrt(uCard**2 + uManuf**2) # Total uncertainty
        return uV,a1/1000,V
    
    def uPower(self,df,mData,pn,N = 9000):
        '''This is the main function to call. Calculate the uncertainty of the measurement pn in W and V. df is the scaled
           data, mData is the metadata, pn is the power sensor measurement (e.g., oau_fan_power), and N is the number of samples
           used in the integration for the fast measurements.'''
        uV,a1,V = self.uPowerV(df,mData,pn) # V, kW/V
        if pn in MiscUnc.fast:
            # The sensor is in the fast category; the uncertainty is the accumulation over 9 seconds
            uVs = 0.001*uV*np.sqrt(N-0.5) 
            u = a1*uVs
        else:
            u = a1*uV
        df['u_'+pn]=u # kW
        df['V_'+pn] = V
        return df
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Glenn M. Dobbs, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-K of Mines Management, Inc. (the “registrant”);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 28, 2006

/s/ Glenn M. Dobbs                                        

Glenn M. Dobbs

Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial
statements together with the related footnotes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         294,200
<SECURITIES>                                    19,400
<RECEIVABLES>                                  313,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,400
<INVENTORY>                                    587,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,360,600
<PP&E>                                       2,200,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 921,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,075,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          683,700
<BONDS>                                      2,008,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        300
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (62,100)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,075,200
<SALES>                                      2,572,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,572,700
<CGS>                                        2,110,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,110,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               336,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             208,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (46,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (42,500)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (57,200)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (8.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (8.17)
        

</TABLE>
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 435

For the relief of Robert and Verda Shatusky. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2003

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Robert and Verda Shatusky.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT TO SUPPLEMENTAL ANNUITY, 

4 SURVIVOR BENEFITS, AND OTHER PAYMENTS 

5 UNDER RAILROAD RETIREMENT ACT OF 1974. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the Railroad Re7 tirement Act of 1974 (45 U.S.C. 231 et seq.), Robert 

8 Shatusky, of Menominee, Michigan, shall be deemed to 

9 have had a current connection with the railroad industry 

10 at the time that his annuity under section 2(a)(1) of such 

11 Act began to accrue. 
2

•HR 435 IH 

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall apply to 

2 any month that begins more than 30 days after the date 

3 of the enactment of this Act. 

4 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF PAST SUPPLEMENTAL ANNUITY BENE5 FITS. 

6 The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any 

7 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to 

8 Robert Shatusky of Menominee, Michigan, a sum that 

9 equals the total amount of any supplemental annuity pay10 ments to which Robert Shatusky would have been entitled 

11 under section 2(b) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 

12 (45 U.S.C. 231a(b)) if section 1(a) of this Act applied to 

13 the period beginning on the date on which his annuity 

14 under section 2(a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 

15 1974 (45 U.S.C. 231a(a)(1)) began to accrue and ending 

16 on the last day of the month preceding the 1st month to 

17 which section 1(a) of this Act applies. 

18 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON AGENT AND ATTORNEY FEES. 

19 It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 per20 cent of the payment required by section 2 to be paid to 

21 or received by any agent or attorney for any service ren22 dered in connection with the payment. Any person who 

23 violates this section shall be guilty of an infraction and 
3

•HR 435 IH 

1 shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided in title 

2 18, United States Code.

Æ
### In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06

- 1 0

- 00 045

- CR

______________________________

CALVIN WAYNE BURNHAM , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 123rd Judicial District Court

Panola County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2005

- C

- 0008

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Calvin Wayne Burnham appeals from his convictions by the trial court on four charges of

aggravated sexual assault of a child and four charges of indecency with a child. Burnham has

filed a single brief, in which he raises issues common to all of his appeals. 1 He argues that the

trial court committed reversible error in considerin g evidence from a previous revocation hearing

when granting the State ’ s second amended motion to adjudicate guilt and in admitting the results

of a polygraph exam ination . Burnham also complains that the evidence was insufficient to

establish that he viola ted any conditions of his community supervision.

We addressed these issues in detail in our opinion of this date on Burnham ’ s appeal in

cause number 06

- 10

- 00038

- CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that

reversible error has not been shown in this case.

We affirm the trial court ’ s judgment.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: December 14, 2010

Date Decided: December 15, 2010

Do Not Publish

1 Burnham appeals from four convictions of aggravated sexual assault of a child and four convictions of indecency

with a child , cause numbers 06

- 10

- 00038

- CR through 06

- 10

- 00045

- CR.
9767.

#### Levens *v.*Arp, guardian.

Decided January 14, 1919.

Complaint; from Heard superior court—Judge Terrell.. February 13, 1918.

*S. Holderness, Hatchett & Hatchett,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. B.*Taylor, *Griffith & Matthews,*contra.

Luke, J.

Under the Civil Code (1910), § 5385 (see *Hindman*v. *Raper,*140 *Ga.*775, 79 S. E. 945), the owner of leased premises cannot recover double rent from a tenant holding over, unless demand is made for the surrender of the leased premises and possession is not delivered by the tenant after such demand. Accordingly, it was error for the court to charge the jury that the plaintiff was entitled to recover double rent for a year prior to the demand and the refusal to deliver possession of the properly so rented. There is' no other error of law complained of which would require a new trial. The court erred in overruling' the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*
Motion Granted, Appeal Reinstated, and Order filed February 2 5 , 2021

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00905

- CV

____________ DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. AND DIAMOND RIG

INVESTMENTS LTD , Appellant s

V.

WILLIAM BLACK , Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015

- 74728



### ORDER We abated this appeal due to appellants’ petitioning for bankruptcy. The parties have filed a joint motion to reinstate the appeal and set a briefing schedule.
Attached to the motion is an order from the bankruptcy court lifting the automatic stay with respect to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(d). The motion is granted, and the appeal is reinstated.

Th e briefing schedule is as follows:2

• Appellants’ brief is due on March 31, 2021.

• Appellee’s brief is due on April 30, 2021.

• Appellants’ reply brief is due on May 20, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Poissant.
Effective 09.24.2019

NCNR Data Management Plan

PURPOSE 

The purpose of this Data Management Plan (DMP) is to articulate the NCNR approach to 

data preservation and access.

SUMMARY

The NIST Center for Neutron Research is a national user facility providing access to neutron 

measurement instruments to thousands of researchers from industry, academia, and 

government agencies. Products of the NCNR include neutron measurement data created 

using NCNR neutron measurement instruments and data that are presented in figures and 

tables in publications.

The NCNR defines raw data as raw measurement counts collected using the data acquisition

system for a neutron scattering instrument at the NCNR.

The NCNR defines published data as data that is presented in figures or tables in publications 

in which a NIST author or co-author is responsible for creating those figures or tables.

SCOPE

The scope of this data management plan includes raw data and published data. The scope of 

this DMP does not include data files collected under the auspices of an NCNR Facility Use 

Agreement for Proprietary Use.

DATA TYPES AND CLASSIFICATION

Data produced by the NCNR neutron measurement instruments are in electronic form and 

they are machine-readable.

PRESERVATION

All NCNR raw data within the scope stated above are archived automatically by the NCNR. 

The responsibility for preserving published results (i.e. the means by which the data is 

preserved) resides with the individual NCNR researcher and will be performed consistent with 

NIST policy and NCNR leadership directives.

DISCOVERABILITY & ACCESS

All NCNR raw data within the scope stated above are made available to the public following 

an experiment unless the researcher who collected the raw data opts out. In those cases 

when the researcher opts out, the raw data will be made available after 18 months from the 

creation date. The data files are made available to the public via external FTP server, 

ftp.ncnr.nist.gov. This repository is listed in the NIST Enterprise Data Inventory, with a 

persistent digital object identifier (DOI): 10.18434/t4201b
All NCNR published data within the scope stated above are made available upon request of 

the NCNR scientist.