alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,430
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                       749
<INVENTORY>                                     26,503
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,338
<PP&E>                                          44,130
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,861
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,576
<BONDS>                                          8,622
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,751
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,050
<SALES>                                         24,532
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,532
<CGS>                                           16,623
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     6
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,222
<INCOME-TAX>                                       637
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                585
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       585
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         231,029
<SECURITIES>                                10,116,248
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,141,439
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,922,454
<PP&E>                                         701,586
<DEPRECIATION>                                 251,332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,372,708
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,271,143
<BONDS>                                      3,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,359
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,049,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,372,708
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,163,179
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,997,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,165,435
<INCOME-TAX>                                   953,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,212,435
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,212,435
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Richard C. Notebaert, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Qwest Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: February 16, 2006
#### UNITED STATES *of*America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Danilo MONTOYA, a/k/a Daniel Montoya, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Regina Vengoechea, a/k/a Regina Lopez De Vengoechea, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 00-4302, 00-4510.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 27, 2001.

Decided May 23, 2001.

Michael MacKinnon, Greenville, SC; Jack B. Swerling, Columbia, SC, for appellants. J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney, A. Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas E. Booth, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for appellee.

Before WILKINS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Danilo Montoya and Regina Vengoechea appeal from their convictions and sentences for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and possession with intent to distribute cocaine. Montoya and Vengoechea each received a 275-month sentence. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

We do not find that the district court abused its discretion in the disputed evidentiary rulings. *United States v. Bostian,*59 F.3d 474, 480 (4th Cir.1995). Appellants’ arguments that their 275-month sentences are invalid under the Supreme Court’s opinion in *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), fail under this court’s sentence stacking reasoning in *United States v. White,*238 F.3d 537 (4th Cir.2001). Finally, we do not find that the district court clearly erred in calculating the amount of cocaine for which Appellants should be held responsible under the Sentencing Guidelines. *United States v. Hyppolite,*65 F.3d 1151, 1158 (4th Cir.1995). Accordingly, we affirm each Appellant’s convictions and sentence.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
437 90 

183 454 

The mission of NICE is to energize, promote, 

and coordinate a robust community working 

together to advance an integrated ecosystem 

of cybersecurity education, training, and 

workforce development. 

12 NEW MATERIALS & RESOURCES CYBERSECURITY CAREER 

AWARENESS WEEK 

Cybersecurity Apprenticeship Finder 

(over 10k unique web views) 

NICE Framework Proficiencies: 

NDAA21 Report 

K12 FAQ for the NICE Framework 

Slovak and Ukraine translations of the 

NICE Framework 

Poster on Activities in 

Underserved Communities 

Poster on Pathways to a 

Career in Cybersecurity 

Cybersecurity Awards Webpage 

Cybersecurity Competitions Webpage 

Events and over 

Commitments 500

over 

People Impacted 100k

Training 

Opportunities 118

Webinars 92

Competitions 15

International 08 Commitments 

New NICE Framework Success Stories (Temple University, 

Cyber Skyline, Cyber Skills, Q-Mission Corp.) 

Webinars 

FISSEA Forums 

Federal Cybersecurity 

Workforce Webinars 

and Summits 

VIRTUAL EVENT PARTICIPATION 

1611

863

1065

Cybersecurity NICE Career 

Conference Awareness Week 

& Expo Kick O° 

IN-PERSON 

EVENTS 

US Cyber 

Games 

Draft Day 

NICE K12 

Cybersecurity 

Education 

Conference 

Multiple Career 

Pathways for 

Cybersecurity 

Project Team 

Improve the 

Quality & 

Availability 

of Cybersecurity 

Credentials 

Project Team 

Cybersecurity 

Career-Entry 

Guidance for 

Employers 

Project Team 

Incorporating 

Cybersecurity 

Into a Public 

Service Education 

Project Team 

Cybersecurity 

Career-Entry 

Guidance for 

Job Seekers 

Project Team 

COMMUNITY COORDINATING COUNCIL PROJECT TEAMS 

WEBSITE VISITORS 

Over 250k 

unique visitors 

87% 

Increase 

in Followers 

Data from January - December, 2022 | nist.gov/nice
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
 
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
report dated March 20, 1998, included or made a part of this Registration
Statement of Remington Oil and Gas Corporation (formerly Box Energy
Corporation), on Form S-4, and to all references to our firm included in this
document.
 
                                            ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Dallas, Texas
   
October 14, 1998
    
 
                                        2
Case: 1:20-cv-04985 Document #: 127 Filed: 02/02/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1179
Case: 1:20-cv-04985 Document #: 127 Filed: 02/02/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1180
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned,  Anthony J. Miceli, Chief Financial
Officer of United  Capital Corp.  (the  "Company"),  does hereby  certify,  with
respect to the Annual  Report of the  Company on Form 10-K for the period  ended
December 31, 2006 (the "Report") that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

Date:  March 26, 2007

                                    /s/ Anthony J. Miceli
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Anthony J. Miceli
                                    Chief Financial Officer
```
EXHIBIT 23.1

Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Mississippi Chemical Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-38619) on Form S 3 and (Nos. 333-36998 and 333-56726) on Form S-8 of Mississippi Chemical Corporation of our report dated October 2, 2003, except for note 28 to the consolidated financial statements, which is as of October 8, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Mississippi Chemical Corporation as of June 30, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, which report appears in the June 30, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of Mississippi Chemical Corporation.

Our report dated October 2, 2003, except for note 28 to the consolidated financial statements, which is as of October 8, 2003, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company's recurring losses and because of insufficient liquidity has resulted in Mississippi Chemical Corporation and nine of its subsidiaries filing voluntary petitions to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on May 15, 2003.  As of the date of our audit report and the date of this consent, the Company has not filed a plan of reorganization.  On October 2, 2003, the Company obtained a debtor-in-possession credit facility which could potentially be insufficient to meet the Company's cash flow requirements.  These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

Our report refers to changes in method of accounting for stock based compensation expense and accounting for asset retirement obligations in 2003.

/s/ KPMG LLP
KPMG LLP

Jackson, Mississippi
October 14, 2003
EXHIBIT 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in (1) the Registration  Statement
on Form S-8, File No.  333-43837,  (2) the  Registration  Statement on Form S-8,
File  No.  333-43839,  (3) the  Registration  Statement  on Form  S-8,  File No.
333-72939 and (4) the Registration  Statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-81037 of
our report dated February 14, 2000 on the consolidated  financial  statements of
Siebert Financial Corp. and subsidiary ("Siebert") included in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Siebert for the year ended December 31, 1999.



/s/ Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP

New York, New York
March 28, 2000
Exhibit 3.3



Amendments to the Bylaws of the Corporation



On March 27, 2006, the Companys Board of Directors approved the following amendments to the Bylaws of the Corporation:



(1)  ADD Section 4.3(d) to ARTICLE IV which shall be the following:



4.3(d) Service on Other Boards of Directors. No director of the Corporation shall serve as a director, or occupy a similar position, of any other exploration or mining corporation or entity without the prior written consent of the Chairman of the Board of Directors of HuntMountain Resources.



(1)  ADD Section 7.3(d) to ARTICLE VII which shall be the following:

7.3(d) Service to Other Companies. No Executive Officer of the Corporation shall serve as an executive officer, or in a similar capacity, or as a consultant, to any other exploration or mining corporation or entity without the prior written consent of the President of HuntMountain Resources.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 24 - 30072 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Jereaud Egans,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:23 - CR - 46 - 1

**______________________________** Before **Graves, Willett,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jereaud Egans has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Egans has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 21, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 24-30072 Document: 60-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2024No. 24 - 30072

2 Egans ’s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R**  **.** 42.2. Case: 24-30072 Document: 60-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/21/2024
Exhibit 99.1

                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report

                  Under Section 906 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Siebert Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Muriel F. Siebert, in my capacity as
Chair and President of the Company (and also having responsibilities equivalent
to Chief Financial Officer of the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

o the Report filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and

o the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Muriel F. Siebert                                     Date: March 28, 2003
Muriel F. Siebert
Chair and President
Annex H. US TAG to ISO/TC276 Biotechnology Participating Organizations

(24 February 2022)

Member Organizations

Organization Interest Category

A2LA Accreditation Bodies & SDOs

ARMI (Advanced Regenerative Manufacturing Institute) Advocacy, Trade & Professional Entities

Astellas Producer

Asymmetrex Producer

AuxoCell Producer

BASF Producer

Beckman Coulter Life Sciences Producer

Bristol Myers Squibb Producer

CAP (College of American Pathologists) Accreditation Bodies & SDOs

Center of Complex Interventions Producer

CIRM (California Stem Cell Agency) Government

Cornell University Academia & Research Entities

Cytiva Producer

Dana Farber Cancer Institute Producer

DiscGenics Producer

DOS (US Department of State), Office of Agriculture 

Policy Government

Duke University Academia & Research Entities

Editas Medicine Producer

FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Government

Fujifilm Cellular Dynamics Producer

Georgia Tech Academia & Research Entities

GenVault Producer

GSK Producer

Immuneering Corp Producer

Indiana University Academia & Research Entities

Kite Pharma Producer

Lawrence Berkeley Lab/DOE Joint Genome Institute Government

Marianna J. Bledsoe Consulting Producer

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Producer

Nexcelom Bioscience Producer

NIH (National Institutes of Health) Government

NIST (National Institute of Standards & Technology) Government

PBS Biotech Producer

PDA (Parenteral Drug Association) Producer

Predictive Biotech Producer

Raytheon BBN Technologies Producer

Restek Copoation Producer

Sartorius Corporation Producer
SCB (Standards Coordinating Body) Advocacy, Trade & Professional Entities

STEMCELL Technologies Producer

University of Colorado Boulder Academia & Research Entities

University of Wisconsin - Madison Academia & Research Entities

USDA (US Department of Agriculture) Government

West Pharmaceutical Services Producer
Exhibit 10.4


     

    Exhibit
      10.4

     

    

    
      
         

      

      
        1

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

    

     

    
      
         

      

      
        2

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

    

     

    
      
         

      

      
        3
#### Steinmetz *v.*The Town of Versailles.

*Town.—License by Town to Sell Intoxicating*Liquors.—The trustees of an incorporated town have no authority to pass an ordinance prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquors within the town limits without a license granted by them.

APPEAL from the Ripley Circuit Court.

Busicirk, J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellant, to recover the penalty imposed by an ordinance passed by the trustees of said town, prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquors within the town without a license from the clerk of said town.

The prosecution originated before a justice of the peace, where the appellant was adjudged to be guilty, from which judgment he appealed to the circuit court.

In the circuit court, the case was tried by a jury and resulted in a verdict against the appellant. The court overruled motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment, to which proper exceptions were taken.

The appellant has assigned several errors, and the ques*250tions involved by such assignment have been discussed by counsel for appellant with great thoroughness and ability; but the conclusion at which we have arrived renders it unnecessary for us to consider and decide more than one of the errors assigned; and the precise question having been decided by this court, upon mature consideration, we shall base our ruling upon the previously adjudged case. The question is presented by the motion in arrest of judgment, which motion calls in question the power of the board of trustees of said town to pass the ordinance in question;

*G. Durbin,*for appellant.

The board of trustees claimed to possess the power to pass the ordinance under and by virtue of the act of March nth, 1867, to amend the seventh clause of section 22 of the act for the incorporation of towns. Acts of 1867, p.220.

In the case of *The Town of Martinsville*v. *Frieze,*33 Ind. 507, we held such act to *be*unconstitutional and *void.*Adhering, as we do, to the ruling in that case, it results that the board of trustees of the town of Versailles possessed no power to pass the ordinance in question.

The judgment is reversed, with costs; and the cause is remanded to the court below, with directions to sustain the motion in arrest of judgment.