IN THE COURT OF Cfclttlis/AL

AWEALS OF TEXAS

AT AUSTIN/ TEXAS MQTK , , DATE: U&l )<;

BY: ft're

JOE 7PJWAS ^EMAVI\^ES

Trial (W Mo^^^HOV^W

Tbcj-ib No.oi&\acm

HeWW/ \vlR-"76,<U>03

V.

COutlT OF bALLAS, DALLAS JA® 08 2Q1$

COUMTV TEXAS AbeMcoste, C/eric

MOTION FOK ANAmAL^>OHV

WSOANT TO TEXAS CObE CRIMINAL WlXEfcURE AMN. A«X 44.04

COnES NOWI, JOE TRAWAS ^EVviAVX^Sj^d Wes +he Courij

\wsuCma\ -Vo Tex.CocU (W.Vroc. Avmo. ^.^4.04j +o reccesJ- \M Oa\\

tc sel. ~^i!i 'WoViaA is oased up<v\ KeWWs r'ic^V to Wm pe^d\v\cx

cx^eal fufsvAcw\V ta TexXoAe Cr^.rYoc. Awn.^. 44.0*4.T/i sup^oc^

\. 0\a vIaAu.(\vr\A ^(oj 3000 \ir\e. K.eWW p\ed a^Uru Vd tkAwor^ o^

a CovnWW Su^sW^ce. 'v\ Ccx^l l\lo. E^V3nO<i-nWj Possession o-P ov

10
CowVrolltd Su^sVcuAce"' Coc&.\v\e m Case. Mo.F^-.21708-Wj a^ol possessio/\

o? ex CowtaoWea SuWtaAAce., Xnlttnt to Deliver'. Cocaine in Case No,

F^-anio-vvi.

2. Thev^e. was a ^Wa \>a;fa<\\Y\ A<\rtav\ev\{ whev~e the. Relator was

ad^AcUcaYed cxva\\V\^ o? tW«. aUe oWe.\Ases.7nc delator's se/\+e*ct was

cxsse-SSed tont ^0 uewrs \v\c&rc£raViD\A V\ Ca^e. Nio. F^^HO^ -WW <m\A

2 v^ears Ya Ca^^os.F°l°i^\108-W(x^l F^V3HI0-W,Ue WaWs se*-

Vev\ces 'we*re suspended ow\d V\e_ was placed ow 5 ^ea\rs cowwviia\a»"Vv\

Supervision ccn^AoeAciAa o\a aa\AVACx\ra ^^>, 5000,

3. 1a Xvavn?, Q000, tW Sx\aW VioWW \yroWV\cv\ and Wc\s

^^AT<Lncxci to 45 daus deVev\V\<xv iv\ OaUcxs Couhti\ dall sta\rV\v\c\

lTvaIv^ \4j 3000 and enclw August 31,3000. TWealW tta 5$e«rs

reavA\ar ^robariOA was re'\ASTared .

4. Xa A^vasVj 3003. tW tle\aW vioWted. broWtiO/'i clue to.oi

VUefl od\avAct-\oa V\ C^se. Nio.FOi-34613-W. 8.e\uW was senWced

•Vo 30 fionth-s V\ TbCT- SVc^Vc Ja\\ m said case, cha NlcWe^b^r 1}

200^ as ^avrlr ot <k ^\ea ^afo,cx\v\ Ao^reeneiAt,

5. On \h<L sai^e, dav\ ot No\ie.mbe^r lJ(^003 a ^ucWrie/if was

entered nwokin* -\W ^coWV'i'OA In Case Nlos. FSV^HO0! -nw, F^4 -

(2)
an08-W and F^-aniO-W. dcUW sentenced to IOuears IbCJ

\a Case Mo. F°i°l-3nOVWW. Sentenced to 30 ^tlns TbCJT- State

Jck'd 1a Cevse Nios, F^-SnOg-W and F°i°i-2niO-\A/ on floe same

dede. All caj.es to iru^i concurrent ajona wI-Ha Case Kio,F03-34<W3-

VJ as \n ootn Plea Dcvraa\v\ Acweewe/i-fs.

(o. On Hau Ik^OO'B) a V\ea.\r'ina was ne\d and delator was

^Wed oa 8 uears shock probaVlon. \n Case Mo. F4°i-3H0^1-HV\),

Said t)NfOOat\OA to Commence on t^au 10, 3003>, delator renamed

Va CMsYodu due to 30 irwontUs m TbCJ-SFate Jcxil \v\ the o-tner

tWee. eases. Sulo^eauenVU ^released °^ Aprd S&^OO^ and actual

^Co^Menxe^en-T of oUock WobaFion ',* Case Mo, WOI1M-MW.

7. On MgutcIa 31, 3005 tke (leWW was cowto[ad ot SUbn<^

aAcl sentenced to ^ ^eairs lnca\rcefaV\on.CaSe M°^ FOS-OOOOGi-IW,

8. On I^Wcn 35;3005; <*. \adqevnent Was en^ed revoW'iAa

tU ieWVoTS Snodc VW)aY>on -lv> Cas-t Mo, Pl°l-31104"^ |U

K.e\aVo\r was SenVev\c<>d TO 10 uears \nca\rce\fatio>A. UttiAa tnjz.

S^Sf>ev\sion ot YUis sentence orlcynallw, InOosed on Ja^uaA/* 9-Wj

5000 as ^>arl- o£ or"»uned vWu bar&ain /Lree/vieinf, OiA twe sa/vie.

c\au tvy-e tv'ial Couird uadded'' a. c^MiAlafiOn Order. Ordeal na
thvs sentence, to fuv\ consecutive to Case Klo.FOS'OOOOS-XW,

S.O^ YWcU 35^ 2005 Ike delator \-\led o, -/noW tW neW

YvSod \v\ bo-\U cases. On Waroh 31; 300S tk^ ^offan ton new

Vial w^s cveluded In boYU ceases,

10. On Ho\ie>\be\r Q, 3005 delator 4\\ed a noFice o( appeal.

\\. Oa F«.Wwa^ 31,3001 Coarl of Appeals F'ttb \Vivlr\ct ot

Texas aV "ballas A-?titled tbe Convictions In Doth C&seS.

l2.4 UpoA enW\A& TbCiT oia Hxu, 8,3001 all se/denc&s we^e

sIaowa Concurrent aAd Relator continued to serve 10 yea^r senYence tV\ab was Wst banded down.

13. IVe to backfime Gredibs mot awarded correctly tbe

\CeWYof Made requesK tWouab Tjrvie Cired it Slesolatlo^ uisnate

and TbCJ-SYaFe Counsel For Offenders. Mob s^YaStied with

tbe resvdts. \le\aFoY- tlVd Writ ot habeas Corpus tor tbe

tntSsi'Acv baclcViAoe credits.

14. Iss^ne. was a^t coa^iT-able Oa babeas bub trial Court

still awarded the. rewaivum Ored>ts and Case Nlo. F^-3110^-

t^lW was obscbcxr^ed On dune 5, 30Q, On tbrs dat^ delator

beaan &e.TviAc\ ^ena\A(W of ^ H^ar sentence In Case Kta.FOS-OOO^i-IW,
15. Klunt ^ro Yunc Yded \n Case Nlo. FO5-00OO°\ araui/ia

Yor backFinn t Credds and Order aranted (Aarcb l&, 3013 .cbawcyna

He\aW's re\e.ase date to AuaiAst 3^.30\1>.Oa |Ls date audit was

done oa KelaYot's Vile, and be was detained due to tne cuwulaf\on order V\ Case Klo, F^VSllO^V^W, ileWYor \s Currently

SefViAa remainder of 10 uea\T senYence as ftarf of \°\ ^ear

SenYeAce. due bo CuvnulaYion Order runnlna tbis senYence conSec^xflv/e to 4 ^ear sentence \v\ Case ^o. F05-00004 -iw.

\(o. HeWW filed \Jr\\ of Ylabeas, Corpus \v\ Case l\lo. F44-

3HOVMW oa VWcb 6,30\4. 0a 'Ha^^aOiq Caurt of CrVnnod

Appeals aenied witboat written order Ybe upplicaYlon Tor wnf

of babeas Corpus on Ybe YiaA\^s of Ybe trial Court wltbout a beArlv^/

, 17. On fV^ 15,3014 WaYor fiUd YloV.on To Include PWlO"

randuvn Tn SiAt^ort Of \dr\\ Of Ylabeas Corpus and Appella/d's Uepld^

To SYaYe's Response To A^pbcaYlon For UriY -Of tUbeas Corpus As Part

Of Tbe Record For Review Of VJrlY Of Habeas Corpus. 3a\d nobion

denied bu Court of CrVmlvvd Appeals Oa June 11,3014.

16, On June 34,^.014 sa'\Y was also filed bu Kelodrcr

uj/^W ^o" 0-S.C. LStobon] ^^Sd^ Joe Trav^pas Ibewcwldes V.
Wdbavn SYe^b en s, u\recW. VCivil Action No. 31N-cv-^^oY C^

Act*ova sVdl ^ev\d\n^ and ope/i,

W. Oa June 35,3014, delator filed Motlov, To (W^lew

Appellants Vmt Of Habeas Corpus Pursuant" To Texas Code OF

CrivniAal rfoceduft Am.At\- 11.01 And IW Fourteenth Avnend-

^Cnb To The \dS. Constitution/ ^avcl Cotton denied b^ CourY

of Cr\rV\na\ Appeals On Juli^ 8, 30|4.

£0. On ^occe^Fer 15)3^4, delator bebeviina bie bad

mo oYber adec|uatt SYcAc remedy aY bw; filed Oriainal

Abdication For VJr'J Of ^AandurAvAS,"

31. As Ybe Sole around, for Ybe instant ^etlfion, Ke\aYor

usks YWs Court Yo eoASider wbeYber the Ke\ato\r is eligible

For- (kv\ appeal bond a^rsuanb fo 7eX Code Crivn,rroc. Aaia.art.

M4.04,

VJHFtlFFOtlF, \le\ator respect talla moves this Court fo

oxanY a V/rlY of Habeas, Corpus, und bo\d a hearing Yo deYern'me bis eligibility tor an aps^l bon.d.

<ti
KeSpecYYull^ oubw^ltled

iLoAUflAnAJs)

be TrovMAasloenavides, *lo/3093>

CK.e\aFor] xeYitionef\

Clewe^t s Uni t

4G>0| Spur 541

A^arillo/Tc, 74101

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

X herebu CerYifu fbab a true and accurate Cop^

of the doreaolna has bee\A Sent bu Certified 05. f^ai |

on \bis Ybe CM dau^ of iU^iAara 50 15 to the

Wslclin^ Jud^e j3G>3rd Judicial Oistricf Court of ualUs

County 7e*as, \V^> tvi. diver-front Hrd. 5fU Floor 3Dallas

Texas ISSiol.-

/V -? ^U T77 Joe tra^ipas benav/iaeS

tdeWfor/PeYltio^erN

17)
IU THE COURT OF CRItniHAL

ATOALS OF TEXAS

AT AOSTIU TEXAS

JOE TRATOAS ^EMAVI^ES

Trial Court islo.F^OlW-MW

SlebWl WR-76,481-03

(Va-Web")

v.

?>G>2>rci OWLCIAL "frlSTRICT

COURT OF DALLAS, DALLAS

COOMTV 7FKAS

ResponaanY.

MWORA^W* XNi SUrVOfcT OF MOTION FOR AM AWEAL

VNfc YURSUAMT TO TEXAS CObE CRIMINAL ?ROCEbUfcE AWiARWO^

Ped'tF'Noner rewcftwu^ subr^iYs tWf he is entitled fo bond

^encllna appeal ^ursManY bo 7eX. Code Crivn, Vroc. Ann.Art. 44.04.

VeY'dioner requests that Ybe court- \ssue a Writ of Habeas Corpus,

and find VvVrV eWble for bond. VeY'dloner also ^quests o\ bearlAQ

on V\ls c\alvns.

STATEMENT OF ISSUES

X. The ^cY'dioner \s enY'dWd do a reasonable appeal bond

^wdVio^ Ws appeal / VMV of fVandaynws.
STATEMENT OF jORTStttCTIONl

Texas provides an oa/enue for rnatbecs perfatnlna to bail

^end'ma a^eab There are. Ynree means fo review bail pending

aA a^eal'. Cft b\^ an appeal ^ur-suanY to Article 44.04 (aY) (2\ bi^

osteal from (x denial of writ of Y^abeas corpus pursuant do

Arb\ele 44.3>6>> V.A.C.C.^.j or Co^bu an orialnal writ of habeas

Corpus fo 4be CourY of CrWn\nal Appeals, Ex ^arYe S^auldivu^6l2

^>Ai. 3d 504 (Tex.Cr.App.\48\\The 'Petitioner feds that hiS best

o^ortunifu fo obtain faVr and substantial justice rejaraiv^

Wis bond pev\di\aa appeal Is fWouabi this peyifioi/\j us the

procedural remeda" uVdlaed herein has historically s&v\itc\ as

a safefa Aet for those who have had their coiflstlYuYional

flabYs violabed.

A^GO^EHT

"Tbe VeY\Yioner brinaS Us clodvn before the court pursuant

fo Tev:.CoieCr'i<n,\)roc.AAA.art. 44.04 ^{ovides that,

The defe^daAf maa not be released on bcvd

\>endincx the appeal from ana^ felonaCoAvicticn

wbere the punishwefd equals or exceeds

\0 aears coinYl aevnenYor where the defendc\iaY V\d* beevn e-onviefed of an ofrense listed

(2\
uwder Section o^Cc^O^ ArYlcle 43.1^ but

shall YfnmecbaYelu be placed 'in cuSToduand

the ba'\\ dlscbaraei.

Tex/CodeCrim.W. An*, art. M4.04. See aUo Thomas v. StaYe^d S.W.

Sd 401 (Tex.App.Corpus CbrisYl 3001\ Lebo v. StaYe^O SW~ 3d

3>34(TexXrw.App. W&YThe, ^Wn lan^ua^e of the sfafube In

dicated C\ trial '^ud^e was ^roY\lb\Yed ffovn releas'mc^ a person

on ba'A \^end\v\a ou^aeal ov\\\\ \f Wis punishment equaled or

(exceeded Yen uears actual VnpnsonmenY) while those who

are placed on ben uears Covnvnunit^ supervision rAxx^ seesk

re\ea.se on WA ^endlna apoeal, Lebo, ^0 SMLod at ooO.

Adefendant aayadvcaW au'df^ ot an offense \A^f\a^«

CAN Secb\o\A 14.0^1, Venal Code Gnurder\

Qfi Section 14-OS, Venal Code (cqp"da\ Murder^

(C\, SecYlon ^\.l\ f^Cn J>enal Code(.'waecenaA with a child\

Cv^ SecY\on 30,04^ Venal Code (aaarasraYed \s\dnappV\a\j

fe^ SecYv\on 33.02} \)enal Code Caaafa/cded: sexual assaulY>F

OF^ SecY^on 34.0^ \Vna\Code Caaaravated robber^; (CVn ^>ecY\on 481^ Cbea\Yn and SateY^ Code\ of

tVh S*cA"«ov\ ;&.0l\> \>ena\ Code ise*ua\ a^saul^

ina.v\ not be released on bad pursuant to 7ex.Code Cmi/^.^roc. Am,

ArY. mbCC 4Co)Cx\G\. See also SkWwr v. Sktt^OOl Tey.App.

Lexis U"s5 (Tex.App.TexarkanaY Adenial of a. defendant's request
Yor an appeal bond upon rev/ocablon of his deferred ad.^uchcadlon Comnun\W Supervision following co/wlcYion tor aaarava\ed

Sexual assault was appropriate because under Tex.Code cYin.Vroc.

AAA.art. 44.04(b\ a defendant who had been convicted of an

Offense under TeK., Code CrWn.\Voc.Ann. art. 43.Qy Ca^aYC) could not

be released on bad 'penchna appeal Id,

lebdtoner now asserts that Ybe ivnposlfion of a Yen year

SCndence as a result oh \do\cd*on for an wvaWidual w/bo was placed

On eiaWY ^AearS of ^shoclc probat\o/\u exceeds Ybe Wi^Yb of scarcerutlon.The YeY\Y\oner Subnets thab he i^ entitled to a Reasonable

bond Weause fWre \S no ofufuW^ basis or Waal cause do

deiaui hlvn ball, Accord\v\aW, Ybe cWiVns taised below ate aoW

properly before this Coutd. The VebiYioner Yherefore respecYfuWi^

TeoiuesYs YbaY Ybe Court bear Ybe claims ftesenled m Ws notion

and this vV*a ora\ndufn of Law.

I. THE VETITIOHER IS E^TITUb TO A RFASONAME Wfc

Tbe VeYiYioner subwViFo YhaV because he aefvAcdl^ be^an serving

ex worY\on of Us Yen uear senYence( he wouWl be entitled W> boni

^end\na appeal, Conwcted felons are not Guaranteed the riabY Yo
bad under the Texas Constitution, lex. Const, art he lb The legislature

Was,however, CreaYed a CiaVit to bad pend'ma an appeal. Tex.CodeCWi.

\Voc. Ann.arY. 44.04. Tex. Code Grivn. Woe. Ann. arY. L|4.04(d) renders a

defenda^F ineligible Yor bad where Us punishment equals or exceeds

10 uears conY\nevnenY or if the defendanY has been convicted of

an offense listed under lex.Code Cflrr ^coc. An/\. art". 43.U, c oaCanCY

Tex.CoAe CriM^roc.Ann.ar-Y. 44.04 CdYIa cases where punishr/ie^l is

\ess Yban \0 ^ears, Ybe Y^ial CourY has discretion Yo set bad or

to deiAu it for aood cause upon belief v\\ that the defendanY w/\l\

aoY appear when the conviction became tinah or (3.\ that he

w\\\ be bWeU to eonrVit another offe/\se wb\W on ball. Iik.

Code Cfivn.^roc. Ann.art MM,04CcN,

VibeA (x defendanY 'is placed on COYAvnunifa supervision no

sentence has been Imposed. WorfVwvAon v. State,, So S.W.3d o45;

S\4(7e^.App.300N(cd^ AnanAo V. SYoAe^S S\d.3dl 330,33/

(Tex. App. \Vn8)\ FurVberJ the sentence is \vnposed for +he birsf ti^ie

when cow\vv\uaibx supervision is (evoked. Xd.

Vjben a court arants shock probation under the provisions

of [a^bcle] 43.IT LS^bbnJ 3e. it suspends the execution father
than Yhe Imposition of the senYence, O'Hara v. S-VaYe.636 S.W,

3d S3/5S (Tex.Crlni.App. l4aM. Tn Ybese circumstances, '4he de

fendant acYucdW ser\/es Ov kordion of Yhe sentence.The Canv-

\cViv\Q Court fAdu then suspend the CxecovYion of the reroai'Ader of the sentence. Id.IY UlWwSj therefore^ tbat a new

SenYence is YNob iraposecl or executed if the probation is re

voked, \v\sbead, Yhe suspension of Yhe execuYion of fV\e senYewce

\s \iffed and the defendant Continues f0 sefve his previously

ordered sentence. See Xd A ou^^aWY'iona order Increases Yhe

leAoYln of the Yer<n of a SenYe^ce;Yherefore; mYbe contexF of

a shock proba.Wo\A revocable^, a CuvnwlaYion order violates

Ybe double jeopardo^ clause of bhe rdfdh Amendment bo the

United Sbabes, ConstifuWon av\d article I, section 14 of the

Texas Consti\uflO\n hu infllcbiw^ additional punishment on a

cfefcndanY vjho Was already sbarbed Servi^a a sentence, for

the same, offense. See Ex parYe leunoUs^W SHSd 605^01

(Tey.Cr^.App.\4l0\see also N/aw M^en v. SdaYe^os.Ol-ukul^-

CRN0\-0V-O\^^^C^a0O^ Tex.App. aey.s 8581, at *3 CTex: App(-Houston

Llst^TsC] Ve, 5, 3002/pet ref dN (nen. op.; not desiamYed for
pubbcatlond. Accordlnala )under Texas law,'a CourY fAai^ Aof add

a Cu\fnu\abion order onYo a sentence alreadu imposed after a

defendant has suffered punishment Uftder bhe sentence as

orla\v\a\lu\ Imposed. Such an attempted Cumulation order is

fiull and mq\& cmd of iao leaal eftecT. CVHara v. StaYe^G

SVJ. 3d aY SS. (Quof.nu from SFepWens v. Stede,30\3 Tex.App.

Ux\s 1>135\

Ia YWs case Ybe VeYvYioner was senYenced Yo ten uears

Inc.arceraYlo^however h'\s sentence was suspended (x^\d ne vnxs

placed On five aears comrwAnlfa Supervision o»a danuarvA ^k;

3000 in Case No.FW-2\10<\-rW. SoWquenYlvA, on November \)

3003) the ^eY\Y\oner \nola\ed \pcoWV\on ard was senbenced

fo 30 roonbhs State Jail..A ^ud^evnent was entered revok'vAa

W\S ^we aear coYnmuniYu oovpeM-vi5\On \v\ Case N^>. FrV^nOWW.

Vlhde servina Us sevnVence fWe ^eYd'\oner was then placed

on. cioWY uears sWocW ^robaf\ov\ for Case t4o.F44-3H04-M\A/

Commencing on tAaa IC/D00"o,Thereafter the YVfiYioner was

released from Stcde dad on April 38,3004. On fWek 3^005,

Yhe VeYifio'Aer Was COirwicYed of Stalking and senbenced do

0\
n\ne uears vncarcerabiom in Case Mo F05-0OO04-IW. On March 35y

3005 j a Vud^emenb vvas enbered fevoking Yhe YeYiYionefS shock

p^obabiovA and he was sentenced bo \t{\ aears mcarcerabiou

\v\ Case Uo. F44-3\10V\V\W. On Yhe sane daa. of rWcb 3S, 3005,

dhe \r\al courb added a CurAuUbion order} orderiAa Case rdo.

F44-St\l0ci-nvj bo r^ consecutive to Case l4o. F05~0OO0q-TW.

Tbis done even fhou&h Yhe 10 uear sentence in Case Mo. F44-

SllOVnW Wad beem p>revious>\u^ \rAposed. That sa^e da^ f[ae

VflWoner filed a notice of appeal a^ Yo Case Mo. F44-3noVnVv.

Tbe \ ebibionef asserts tbat be is entitled to bond p^^-

dina^ appeal because Wis sentence in Case Mo. FS4-217O^-WW

^is less than ten uears1 confinevnenb. Jht Kbitloners Sentence

Was \rnposed for tie. first finne on FtavewWer I, 300^,when his

Community supervision Was revoked. A\ that Writhe refitioiAer

beaan serv\w\ f-wne on Wis sentence. 'In tact, the Petitioner bad

Served afleast ^ uears T months 33 dau^s of his original

se\Afe-V\ce as evidenced o^ the fact tnaf he was \no+ placed

on .shock dxobabion until fdau lb, 3003, T/vs total due. to the

debaVnvnent for ^YaYe dad on tAcx^\k>, 3003 until .Aprd 3o,
3004 and all presentence hearing \d\l finoe 'HAcUdlna fr-oun

September \> 3004 WMarch £5, 3005 fhe dabe of sentencing

a^d addition of Yhe cumulation order with all sentences

Concurrent up bo YhaY dabe. Since Yhe Vebifioner b^s already

Served Wne on his senYence, bis punishment incarcerated11 is

Wss tWan den uears. FurYnerrAore Yhe VeY'd^oner believes

be Was CompleYed Us ^entencefs'N dau for dau as of AuausY

34,^013. VeYibioner also beheves. pucsuaAb to the findings of

•\b\s Court \v\ W\s Oricunal App\icaf\on For VJcit of lAandawus

YhaY a consfifubional riabb Was violated QAd relief will

be. aranted due to fhe Flea ?sarqa\\a AareevneAd Vn Case

tdo. F44-^IT04-FAW- which clearL shows no cumulation order

Wa^ aar^d upon on January 0G>( 3000. Therefore, the Vefitioner

request that bail be set pursuant to Tex.Code Crirv^fVoc.Ann.art,

44.04

COtACLUSTOM

For the abov/e sbaVed reasons; fVtibioner respectfully

requesYs YhaY YW\S honorable CourY Yo find that Ybe FetifioAer

Is ella'ible bo^ bor>d ^endW\<^ appeal.
ftespecYYulli^ Submibed,

{foe Trampcxs "Wvavides ^18 J3.0S3

\betaYor JVe Yi tione rt rco 3e

Cleme/ifs Oi/iit

S(pO\ Spur 541

AmarilU,Texas T^lOl

CF&TTFICATE OF SERVICE

T hereba eerYifu YWaV a \v\a<l and accurate copu^

of YhiS document has been sent b^ CerYlfied O.S, Had

On this the £J/i aaa of danuaru 3015 to the iVesidiM

Judae i3(*3>rd Judicial VvsYrlcf Court of ballas, WalUs"

Cow\W Texas, \33 M. Riverfront loVd. 5th Floor, Dallas

Texas "15301

Case ^/i^rpjvo l^^uiJL,

u

00).

Joe Tra^pcv's 'fceA&vide."S ^/o^0°/3>

Relator / Petitioner , Pco Se
IVb TWt COORX OF CfclVtfttAL

AWEAIS OF TEXAS

AT AUSTIN TEXAS

JOE TRAWAS IsEUAMlbFS

Trial Court i\k>.F44-3noq-rw

TbCd-Ilo Mo.0lS\3043

delator I WH-7(b, 4o>03

GvtlFoner ^

V,

3G3rd dOblCXAl blST^ICT

COOkT OF DALLAS ,DALLAS

COOUTV TEXAS

HespoAtlevd.

fnOTIOU FOR UHCH WARRANT

TO THE UOMOkAM JUbdE OF SAlfc COURT"

COWES FlOW , doe Trampas VAavideSjWrYdione^ j^o Se In

Ybe above staled and numbered Cause and states-

(Au name \S doe Trampas ^benavidesW^efitloners,^ offender

dumber \s". 0184304.3.1 am competent Yo make Ybis afficlav/Y. -^ a^

presenYU w\carceraYea )v\ the qA\ Cle^e^ts Unit located at 90>O I

Spur 541, Anardlo, Texas 14101. X request the Court to Issue

C\ \Tar^aAf from the Dench ordering the Sheriff of t)odW County,

x
do transport me to the S(»3rd dudicial WisYrl^Y Court of ua11 as in

Wallas Countix Texas for hear\na \wYhis maWer so Yhat I wa^ give

TesYlmoAOj re^ard'»Aa appea.1 bond.

HAVEk

VeY'dloner respectfully prai^S tbcd this Court grant fUs

motiou and order Yhe Sheriff of Wallas County do transpo^Y

^eYiYloner Yo the bearina of thlis cause.

Wes-pecffull^ Submitted ,

Vet'.Yiofiec, Pro Sle

doe Trampas Wenavlde^ ^ 181^0^3

Clements Ori'if

40>Q\ Spur 541

Amarillo/Tx. 14101

H
IH TUF COURT Or CKLNIHAL

AFPEAFS OF TEXAS

AT AUSTIN TEXAS

•dOF TKAH^AS ^bE^AMI^S

TbCd-Ib Uo.0\&\3043

kelaYorl Wk~l6,4&l-OS CWY'dlonebYj

V.

3G3fd uOblClAF blSTRICT

COOR.T OF DALLAS, DALLAS

COUNTS TEXAS

Kespondent.

OW>£fc

On YUs fhe daa^ of 3015, came on fo

be Weard Ybe defendants Request f0f 'Wench Warrant anol after

clue Cons'\de\rad\on of the sarne VV is,

ORbEte^ that the Wefenda^W reauest for a hearing is

(GKAUTE^u J^EHTEA^ and thab sa\cl Cause is set for heariv^

on Ybe da^ of ^30l5\and \\ is furfbe^

HI

Tna\ CourV Ho.F44-anoq-nW
OR£>E^E\o YbaY fbe defendant's request (or be/icb warrant

\S (G^AMTFb/WEHlE^i and Ybe Cled< of fbe Court notify saU

iSefeadanf reaard'Wxcx Yhe WencW Warrant of the Defendant to

tbib County for sa\d driab

JUloGF PkFSlMUG

E