alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha
Nutra, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Pu Yue, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and will be retained by China
Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


May
      18, 2010PuYue (Principal Accounting and
      Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28111]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-356-000]


Chief Conemaugh Power, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Chief Conemaugh Power, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is December 11, 2014.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ccac9decfc3e2e0e5e2e9dff9fcfce3fef8cceae9feefa2ebe3fa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c4828196878baaa8adaaa197b1b4b4abb6b084a2a1b6a7eaa3abb2">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: November 21, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-28111 Filed 11-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 14 ,

2018.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00439- CV

LONNIE L. MOORE, Appellant

V. BRAND ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL, Appellee
On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016-52197

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This is an appeal from an order signed March 14, 2018. On June 11, 2018, appellant filed a notice of non-suit. We construe the filing as a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.
Exhibit 32.1

                            MICROPAC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                             CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Micropac  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-kSB for the period ending  November 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Connie Wood,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


 /s/ Connie Wood
-------------------
Connie Wood, President and CEO
(Principal Executive Officer)
##### 



THE MIDLAND COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Exhibit (21) - Subsidiaries of the Registrant
December 31, 2004 The
subsidiaries of the registrant as of December 31, 2004, all of which are included in the consolidated
financial statements, are as follows: PercentageState of
    
    of VotingIncorporation
    
    Stock OwnedM/G Transport Services, Inc.
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100Midland-Guardian Co.
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100MGT Services, Inc.
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100SUBSIDIARIES OF MIDLAND-GUARDIAN CO.:American Modern Insurance Group, Inc.
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN MODERN INSURANCE GROUP, INC.:American Modern Home Insurance Company
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100American Family Home Insurance Company
    
    Florida
    
    
    100American Modern Life Insurance Company
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100Lloyds Modern Corporation
    
    Texas
    
    
    100American Modern Home Service Company
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100Modern Services Group, Inc.
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100American Modern Financial Services, Inc.
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE COMPANY:American Modern Lloyds Insurance Company
    
    Texas
    
    
    100American Southern Home Insurance Company
    
    Florida
    
    
    100American Western Home Insurance Company
    
    Oklahoma
    
    
    100G.U.I.C. Insurance Company
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100
 23
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         167,879
<SECURITIES>                                   164,819
<RECEIVABLES>                                  758,427
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,193
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                          17,777
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,282,659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                        363,427
<COMMON>                                           293
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                     21,518
<OTHER-SE>                                     24,532
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              1,282,659
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              156,672
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 119,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                6,360
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             18,788
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                12,382
<INCOME-TAX>                                         4,236
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             8,038
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         8,038
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               32,073.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                               32,073.00
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2





                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this registration statement of our report dated March 16, 1998
included in LifeQuest Medical, Inc.'s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 1997 and to all references to our Firm included in this registration
statement.


                                                  /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP




San Antonio, Texas
July 29, 1998
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Creative Beauty Supply of New
Jersey Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year end
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carmine Catizone, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Carmine Catizone
-----------------------------
Carmine Catizone
Chief Executive Officer

March 12, 2007


        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Creative BeautySupply of New
Jersey Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel Generelli, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Daniel Generelli
-----------------------------
Daniel Generelli
Chief Financial Officer

March 12, 2007
Page 41

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                               CROWELL & CO., INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Year ended December 31,
                                                            -----------------------
                                                              1996           1995
                                                          -----------    -----------
<S>                                                       <C>            <C>         
NET LOSS                                                  $   (27,180)   $   (13,153)

PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS                                     (80,952)        80,952
                                                          -----------    -----------

         NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS       $  (108,132)   $   (94,105)
                                                          ===========    ===========

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
   Weighted average number of common shares outstanding     2,520,835      2,520,835
   Primary earnings per share
      loss from continuing operations                     $      (.02)   $      (.11)
      Income from discontinued operations                        (.03)           .07
                                                          -----------    -----------

         NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE                        $      (.05)   $      (.04)
                                                          ===========    ===========
</TABLE>
| (1)   | the      Quarterly Report of Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the      quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|            |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |

| (2)   | information      contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the      financial condition and results of operations of Willamette Valley      Vineyards, Inc. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 15, 2010 | By:    | /s/      R.      Steven Caldwell                |   |
|------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   | Name:      R. Steven Caldwell                        |   |
|                         |   | Title:   Chief      Financial Officer |   |
|                         |   |                                                 |   |

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James W. Bernau, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Willamette Valley Vineyards
Inc.

Date: August 12, 2005
By:	 /s/ James W. Bernau
Name: James W. Bernau
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
No. 16,404.

#### Curry *v.*The State, for Use of Rhine, Drainage Commissioner.

*Notice.*— Sufficiency *of Proof of Publication.*— Tlie proof of publication is sufficient when the affidavit of the publisher of the newspaper in which the notice was published states that “the notice was duly published in said paper for three weeks consecutively, the first of which publications was on the 11th of September, 1890, and the last on the 25th day of *440September, 1890. The reasonable and fair construction of the affidavit is that the first and third publications were on the first and last days mentioned, and the second on an intervening day.

Filed April 30, 1892.

From the Blackford Circuit Court.

*R. S. Gregory, A. C. Silverburg*and *J. N. Templer,*for appellant.

*W. H. Carroll, G. Dean, B. G. Shinn*and *E. Pierce,*for appellee.

Elliott, C. J.

The appellant entered a special appearance and moved to quash “ the proof of publication.” Assuming that the motion properly presents the proposition argued by counsel, which is that the notice was not published the requisite length of time, we shall consider and decide the question argued, but in doing this we do not mean to be understood as deciding that it is well presented. The affidavit of the publisher of the newspaper in which the notice was published states that “ the notice was duly published in said paper for three weeks consecutively, the first of which publications was on the 11th day of September, 1890, and the last on the 25th day of September, 1890.” The statement of the publisher that the notice was published three weeks consecutively, repels the assumption that there were but two insertions of the notice in the newspaper. The reasonable and fair construction of the affidavit is that the first publication was on the day first named, the third publication on the day last named, and the second on a day intervening between the first and last dates named in the affidavit. The decisions require this construction and sustain the sufficiency of the notice. *Security Co., etc.,*v. *Arbuckle,*123 Ind. 518; *Horn*v. *Indianapolis Nat’l Bank,*125 Ind. 381.

The other questions in the case are fully disposed of by the decision in the case of *Racer*v. *State, etc., ante,*p. 393.

Judgment affirmed.’
#### Christopher Kirchner v. George Wood et al.

*Final order.*

*An*order overruling a demurrer is not final and appealable.

Appeal from Yan Burén.

Submitted and decided Apr. 20.

Creditor’s bill. Defendants appeal.

Dismissed.

. *Mills c& Hilton*for complainants.

*L. A. Tabor*for defendants.

Cooley, J.

To the bill in this case the- defendants demurred generally. The court overruled the demurrer, and gave the defendants leave to answer within ten days. They did not answer, and after the ten days had expired^ appealed to this court.

Held, that the order or decree overruling the demurrer was not a final decree, and therefore not appealable under the statute. Whether the defendants did- or did not exercise their right to answer is immaterial on this question. Overruling the demurrer gave no relief to complainant, and decided nothing but the sufficiency of the pleading.

Appeal dismissed.*
NIST PSCR RESEARCH INVESTMENTS BOLSTER 

OKLAHOMA’S ECONOMY 

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Public Safety 

Communications Research (PSCR) Division is the primary federal laboratory 

focused on conducting research, development, testing, and evaluation for 

public safety communications technologies. Their mission is to accelerate 

communications innovation in support of public safety communities and the 

citizens they serve. 

The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 allocated $300 Million 

from the Public Safety Trust fund to NIST PSCR to perform critical public safety 

communications R&D during a 10-year period. PSCR implemented numerous 

research mechanisms to support the development and deployment of the 

Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network: grants, Small Business Innovation 

Research (SBIR) contracts, prize challenge competitions, and internal research. 

These research mechanisms were housed within six research portfolios and crosscutting initiatives to maximize their impact: 

•	 User Interface/User Experience •	 Public Safety Analytics

•	 Location-Based Services •	 Security

•	 Mission Critical Voice •	 Resilient Systems 

While the ultimate impact of these research mechanisms is the increased safety 

of first responders and their communities through improved communications

technologies, PSCR was interested in better understanding how their R&D 

investments to date result in economic impacts that ripple outward to state 

economies. An independent analysis was conducted to demonstrate how PSCR’s 

deployment of the $300 Million from the Public Safety Trust Fund translated into 

broader impacts to the United States, including jobs, earnings, value added, and 

total economic output. PSCR’s R&D investments resulted in economic output 

in 33 of the 50 states. Results of the analysis are presented here. 

For more information, see NIST PSCR’s Economic Impact Study. 

1 Prize Challenge 

Participant 

Awards Totaling 

$0.07 Million 

For additional information of PSCR’s research programs, visit https://www.nist.gov/ctl/pscr. 

amount.

OKLAHOMA BY THE NUMBERS 

NIST INVESTMENT 

$0.07 Million 

OUTPUT 

$0.4 Million 

VALUE-ADDED 

$0.2 Million 

EARNINGS 

$0.2 Million 

JOBS 

3 

Output: the total value of economic 

activity circulating through the U.S. 

economy generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Value-Added: how much the 

combined U.S. state economies 

grew over a period of time due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments 

Earnings: the change in household 

earnings in the U.S. economy 

generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Jobs: the change in the number of 

full- and part-time jobs generated 

by each one million dollar change 

in U.S. economic activity due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments 

*All dollar amounts presented 

in 2022 and reflect data as of 

October 2022.

**All values are rounded; thus, the 

sum of the components may not 

sum exactly to the NIST Investment