alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 97-10251

Summary Calendar

_______________________

MICHAEL WAYNE BOHANNAN,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT

OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(4:96-CV-326)

_________________________________________________________________

April 1, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.*

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

Michael Wayne Bohannan, Texas prisoner # 366986, appeals

the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. A

certificate of appealability was granted for Bohannan’s appeal.

Bohannan argues 1) that his plea agreement was violated

when he was not returned to the Texas Department of Criminal

Justice-Institutional Division (TDCJ) following the revocation of

his mandatory supervision and 2) that he was denied the restoration
2

of good-time credits, which had been forfeited when his mandatory

supervision was revoked. He contends that the TDCJ had a policy in

effect at the time of his mandatory-supervision revocation, which

allowed for the restoration of good-time credits, but that by the

time he was placed in a TDCJ facility, the TDCJ policy had changed

to disallow the restoration to prisoners convicted of a violent

offense.

Bohannan has not shown that his plea agreement included

a promise that he would be returned to a TDCJ facility if his

mandatory supervision was revoked and he was again incarcerated.

He has thus not demonstrated that his plea agreement was breached.

See Smith v. Blackburn, 785 F.2d 545, 548 (5th Cir. 1986) (prisoner

must prove exact terms of alleged promise). 

A COA was not granted on the issue whether Bohannan was

denied a constitutional right by not having his good time credits,

which were forfeited when his mandatory supervision was revoked,

restored. We therefore cannot review this issue. See Lackey v.

Johnson, 116 F.3d 149, 151-52 (5th Cir. 1997). Furthermore,

Bohannan’s argument is without merit. See Hallmark v. Johnson, 118

F.3d 1073, 1079-80 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 118 S.Ct. 576 (1997).

The district court’s denial of Bohannan’s habeas claims

is AFFIRMED. The respondent’s motion to amend the appellate record

and Bohannan’s motion for injunctive relief pending this court’s

decision on his appeal are DENIED.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24E0082. IN THE INTEREST OF N. R. P., A CHILD (MOTHER).

Kaleigh Burns Smith has filed this emergency motion for an extension of time

to file an application for discretionary review pursuant to Court of Appeals Rules 16

(c), 31 (h), and 40 (b). The motion having been filed in accordance with this Court’s

rules, we hereby GRANT Smith an extension of time until July 31, 2024, in which to

file an application for discretionary review.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

July 18, 2024

07/18/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,982,310
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,322,358
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     489,204,001
<DEPRECIATION>                           (224,080,148)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,100,682,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    549,020,798
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,503,679
<OTHER-SE>                                 183,405,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,100,682,795
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            96,580,112
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,849,798
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            41,957,353
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,433,304
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,620,757
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,700,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,920,757
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,920,757
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000064892
<NAME> FDS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                           <C>              <C>               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS           12-MOS            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAR-31-2000      MAR-31-1999       MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                APR-01-1999      APR-01-1998       APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-2000      MAR-31-1999       MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                        24313            19533             16626
<SECURITIES>                  52560            2088              11603
<RECEIVABLES>                 48288            39503             33274
<ALLOWANCES>                  2976             2072              1606
<INVENTORY>                   34441            30552             27557
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              168462           141981            144515
<PP&E>                        36522            42532             37962
<DEPRECIATION>                7760             7537              6187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                230706           196011            199911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         44296            35230             30858
<BONDS>                       0                0                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0                0                 0
<PREFERRED>                   0                0                 0
<COMMON>                      2421             2455              2502
<OTHER-SE>                    5017             880               5000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  230706           196011            199911
<SALES>                       247344           202783            180267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              247344           202783            180267
<CGS>                         92657            76174             59122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 207913           172642            143481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              2958             1019              1645
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0                0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            34               272               27
<INCOME-PRETAX>               42389            30888             38404
<INCOME-TAX>                  13563            10447             13575
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           28826            20441             24829
<DISCONTINUED>                7713             (6479)            (932)
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0                0                 0
<CHANGES>                     0                0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                  36539            13962             23897
<EPS-BASIC>                   1.50             .57               .96
<EPS-DILUTED>                 1.46             .55               .91


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 333-133898, 333-121705, 333-119808, and 333-112932 onForm S-8 of our report, dated March 7, 2007, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements and financial statement schedule of Maui Land &Pineapple Company, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to changes in accountingfor pension and postretirement benefits and share-based payments) andmanagement’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Maui Land &Pineapple Company, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

| /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|
|                               |   |
| Honolulu, Hawaii  March 7, 2007    |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73115-73116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28737]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Effective date: December 9, 2014.

[[Page 73116]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 2, 2014, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail 
Contract 102 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2015-13, CP2015-16.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Requirements.
[FR Doc. 2014-28737 Filed 12-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Matter of the Estate of Henry Rath, Deceased.

(Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

June, 1919.)

Executors and administrators — who may be appointed to act as executor.

The German Society of the City of New York, which is authorized by the special act incorporating it “ to perform duties of every description as may be committed to it by any *599person or persons whatsoever * 16 * or by a surrogate or by any courts of record” is empowered to act as the executor of an estate.

Proceeding upon the prohate of a will.

Edward M. Burghard, for executor.

Tauseh, Hamilton & Herrlieh, for executrix.

Fowler, S.

The testator in his will nominated and appointed the German Society of the City of New York as his executor, and the question presented to the surrogate is whether the German Society of the City of New York is authorized by its charter to act as executor of an estate.

The German Society of the City of New York was incorporated by a special act of the legislature passed April 6, 1904. This act was amended in 1909, and it now provides that the society shall have power *“*to perform duties of every description as may be committed to it by any person or persons whatsoever * * * or by a surrogate or by any courts of record. The authority to act as executor is derived from the will, and letters testamentary are merely the authentic evidence that the will has been proven and that permission has been given to the executor by the court having jurisdiction to exercise the powers conferred by the testator in his will. *Hartnett*v. *Wandell,*60 N. Y. 346; *Matter of Bergdorf,*206 id. 312. It seems to me that that provision of the act of incorporation which authorizes the society to perform any duty committed to it by any person whatever is sufficiently comprehensive to embrace the duty of executor committed to it by the testator, and this court, therefore, will issue to it letters testamentary under the will of the testator.

Decreed accordingly.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0016 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RILEY JOSEPH LANDWEHR,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 13, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brie f on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 4 2022

05/04/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0016
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50335 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAVIER RUBEN PEREZ-RUELAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-1493-ALL-H

-------------------- October 23, 2001 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Javier Ruben Perez-Ruelas (Perez) has appealed his conviction, based on his guilty plea, of having unlawfully reentered the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We affirm. Perez contends that he is entitled to reversal because, at his rearraignment, the district court did not advise him (1) that the court must consider any applicable guideline in determining his sentence and (2) of the effect of the supervised-release term which he would receive. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1).No. 01-50335 -2- Perez is not entitled to reversal as a result of the district court’s not advising him concerning the guidelines, because the record shows that it did not affect his willingness to plead guilty. See United States v. Vasquez-Bernal , 197 F.3d 169, 171 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied , 528 U.S. 1130 (2000). The district court’s failure to explain the effect of a supervised-release term was harmless error because the total of the prison term and the supervised-release term which Perez actually received, plus the maximum prison term he can receive if his supervised release is revoked, is less than the maximum prison term provided by law for the offense, which Perez had been made aware of at rearraignment. See United States v. CuevasAndrade , 232 F.3d 440, 444 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1748 (2001). AFFIRMED.
10493.

#### Jenkins *v.*Lowrey, for use, etc.

Decided July 17, 1919.

Complaint; from city court of Waynesboro—W. H. Davis. March 4, 1919.

*E. V. Heath,*for plaintiff in error.

*Frank Hwdeman,*contra.

Luke, J.

Jenkins was sued on a promissory note, and admitted a primafacie case and pleaded payment. The evidence wholly failed to show payment as pleaded, and it was not error for the court to direct a verdict for the plaintiff.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, O. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*
United States Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

Nevada

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, and has demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope

(Rev.: September 2021)

2023 to 2024

____________________________________

Katrice Lippa, Chief

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

Effective Dates: 2023-02-01 to 2025-02-01

Mass Echelon II

25 kg to 1 mg

50 lb to 0.001 lb

Mass Echelon III

25 kg to 1 mg

1000 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Volume Gravimetric, I

5 gal to 2 fl oz

Volume Transfer, II

600 gal to 5 gal

Volume Transfer, II LPG

100 gal and 20 gal
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-27-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-28-1999
<CASH>                                         761,634
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,204,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,367,752
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,611,059
<PP&E>                                       2,374,764
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,764,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,872,371
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           684
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,764,598
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,064,170
<CGS>                                        4,678,546
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,560,825<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,403
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (633,602)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (784,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (784,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  67,435
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (716,965)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
<FN>
<F1>SG&A
</FN>


</TABLE>
EX-10.1






Description of 2006 Non-Employee Director Compensation




Annual Retainers and Meeting Fees. Each of our non-employee directors, upon election to our
board of directors at our 2006 annual meeting of shareholders, will receive a $25,000 annual
retainer for service on our board of directors in 2006, with 50% of the annual retainer fee payable
on or about the date of the annual meeting and 50% payable on or about August 15, 2006. In
addition, each non-employee director also will receive a fee of $1,250 for each board of directors
meeting attended in person or by conference call, and $1,250 for each board committee meeting
attended by the non-employee director. Each member of our audit committee will receive an annual
retainer of $4,000 for serving as a member of our audit committee and the chair of the audit
committee will receive an additional $8,000 annual retainer. The chairs of our compensation
committee and governance and nominating committee each will receive an annual retainer of $4,000
for serving in these roles. The committee retainer fees are payable on or about August 15, 2006.
Each non-employee director may elect to receive, in lieu of the cash retainer fees, shares of
restricted stock issued under our Amended and Restated 1996 Incentive Plan.



Option Grants. Following our 2006 annual meeting of shareholders, each non-employee director
elected to our board of directors on that date will receive an option pursuant to our Amended and
Restated 1996 Incentive Plan to purchase 3,000 shares of common stock at the fair market value per
share of our common stock at the time the option is granted.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000294

28-OCT-2016

09:06 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          51,060
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  200,074
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,323
<INVENTORY>                                    105,040
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               358,947
<PP&E>                                         433,391
<DEPRECIATION>                                 206,914
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 792,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          269,783
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,988
<OTHER-SE>                                     119,863
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   792,733
<SALES>                                        771,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               771,188
<CGS>                                          358,169
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  358,169
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               303,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 82,351
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,023
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             64,328
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    64,328
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.42


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.
333-144680, No. 333-43837, No. 333-43839, No. 333-72939 and No. 333-102701, and
Form S-3 No. 333-81037) of Siebert Financial Corp. and in the related
prospectus of our report dated March 29, 2012 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Siebert Financial Corp. and our report dated February
28, 2012 with respect to the financial statements of Siebert, Brandford, Shank
& Co., L.L.C. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2011.

/s/
EisnerAmper LLP

New York, New
York
March 29, 2012

---