alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                           1,056
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,560
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,854
<PP&E>                                           7,142
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,917
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,441
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,290
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,541
<SALES>                                         43,621
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,621
<CGS>                                            7,404
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,473
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,120
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 994
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,034
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,876
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,158
<DISCONTINUED>                                (33,603)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,445)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.21)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.8

                     AGREEMENT ON SHARE TRANSFER RESTRICTION

WiderThan Co., Ltd. (the "Company") and _____ (the "Shareholder") agrees on the
restriction on transfer of shares of the Company which is held by or will be
obtained by the Shareholder through right issue, bonus issue, employee share
ownership association, stock dividends, stock option and other sources not
specified (the "Shares").

     1. The Shareholder must notify and obtain approval from the Company prior
     to transfer of the Shares.

     2. The Company may provide the right of first refusal at par value to the
     Company or to a person designated by the Company on the Shares which the
     Shareholder intends to transfer, except when reason of share transfer is
     unavoidable such as inheritance.

     3. The Shareholder agrees that in case the Shareholder quits the Company
     before termination of this agreement, the Company may decide the Shares to
     be transferred to a third party at par value.

     4. This contract will be terminated 3 years after the agreement has been
     signed. However, if the Company is listed in domestic or foreign stock
     exchange before the termination, this agreement will be effective until the
     time of listing.

     5. The Shareholder will be liable for all the civil claims and liabilities
     in case the Shareholder fails to comply with the conditions set forth in
     this contract.

     In witness whereof, the undersigned, being duly authorized by their
     respective Parties, have signed this agreement. This agreement is drafted
     and signed in duplicate copies, both copies being equally authentic, and
     each copy shall be kept by each party.


                                                                         200 . .

<TABLE>
<S>                                      <C>

Company                                  Shareholder
WiderThan Co., Ltd.                      Name:
--------------------------                     -------------------------
463 Chungjeong-ro 3-ga,                  Address:
Seodaemun-gu, Seoul
WiderThan Co., Ltd.
CEO Sangjun Park
</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0133 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHARLES ANDREW DRURY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 27, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 20 2022

04/20/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0133
EXHIBIT 10.1

               ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF LIABILITIES AGREEMENT

Agreement made as of the 23rd day of May, 2005 between Ocean West Enterprises,
Inc., a 100% owned subsidiary of Ocean West Holding Corporation ("OWHC"), which
is being spun off to the Shareholders of OWHC as of May 23, 2005
("Enterprises"). For $1.00, and other valuable consideration, receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, Enterprises hereby assumes, and OWHC hereby assigns to
Enterprises, all liabilities and obligations ("Liabilities") of OWHC as of the
date hereof both known and unknown including, but not limited to, the
Liabilities described on Exhibit A hereto, and Enterprises agrees to pay the
Liabilities and to do and perform each and every thing required of Enterprises
to be done or performed in the same manner and with the same effect as though it
originally had been obligated on the Liabilities. Enterprises and Consumer
Direct of America, the majority shareholder of Enterprises following such
spinoff, hereby jointly indemnify and hold harmless OWHC and its officers,
directors, employees, representatives and shareholders from all such
Liabilities.

In WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Assignment and
Assumption of Liabilities Agreement as of this 23 day of May, 2005.


                                        Ocean West Enterprises, Inc.

                                        By: /s/ Wayne Bailey
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Wayne Bailey


                                        Ocean West Holding Corporation

                                        By: /s/ Wayne Bailey
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Wayne Bailey


                                        Consumer Direct of America

                                        By: /s/ Michael Barron
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Michael Barron

<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT A

                               ASSUMED LIABILITIES

1.    "Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses"

2.    Due to Stockholder

3.    Current Maturities of Long Term Debt

4.    Long Term Debt

5.    Due to Ocean West Enterprises
##### 



Exhibit 32.B CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2003, of ANR Pipeline Company (the Company) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Greg G.
Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer certify (i)
that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Greg G. GruberGreg G. GruberMarch 29, 2005
    Senior Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ANR Pipeline Company and will be retained by ANR Pipeline Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Sigmund Simon v. Seligman Schloss et al.

*Mnal order*— Receivership *contrary to agreement of parties.*

An order appointing a receiver to take possession of and collect certain partnership accounts was unwarranted where the parties had themselves fully agreed how the accounts should be collected, and defendants were responsible. Such an order is appealable.

Appeal from Superior Court of Detroit.

Submitted April 6.

Decided April 25.

Bill for accounting. Defendants appeal.

Reversed.

*Moore <& Moore*for complainant.

*Griffin, Dickinson, Thurber dh Hosmer*and *John Atkinson*for defendants.

Where parties are responsible a controversy should be determined on the merits before appointing a receiver to take charge of their affairs: *Barry v. Briggs*22 Mich. 201; *Taylor v. Sweet*40 Mich. 736; McCombs *v. Merryhew*id. 721.

Marston, J.

Prior to December 17, 1879, the parties •hereto had been engaged, as co-partners, in carrying on business as wholesale jobbers in clothing, dry goods, etc., in the •city of Detroit, On that day they entered into an agreement for a dissolution of the firm and a division of their stock of goods. They also agreed therein that all outstanding accounts, notes and mortgages of the firm, except those appearing upon the city ledger so called, should be collected by the defendants, and a disposition of the moneys so collected was also provided for. It was also agreed therein that all accounts, notes and mortgages which should have matured and be outstanding at the expiration of one year from the date of the dissolution, should be disposed of as the parties could agree, and if no unanimous agreement ■could b'e had, then such accounts should be placed in the hands of some proper person for collection. It was also *234farther agreed that accounts past due and not settled for a. reasonable time after the expiration of such year, either of said parties should have the right, after notice to the others, to secure the settlement of such accounts in such a shape and manner as should be advantageous to the retiring firm, the expense of collection to be paid out of the partnership funds.

Under this agreement the parties had agreed fully and clearly how these accounts should be collected, and the disposition made of this matter by the court, in appointing a receiver to take possession of and collect the same, would in our opinion violate the letter and spirit of the mode agreed upon by the parties. The defendants are responsible, and no danger can be apprehended in awaiting a disposition of this case upon the merits before resorting to such a remedy. That an appeal lies from such an order is no longer open to question in this State. Both these matters we consider as settled. *Arnold v. Bright*41 Mich. 210, and cases cited.

The order must be reversed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>    5
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           58,925
<SECURITIES>                                    186,346
<RECEIVABLES>                                   677,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                     12,327
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0
<PP&E>                                           19,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                   10,337
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                1,112,389
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0
<BONDS>                                         190,131
<COMMON>                                            293
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                      20,954
<OTHER-SE>                                       32,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1,112,389
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                155,135
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                112,766
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  8,131
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               19,375
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  14,863
<INCOME-TAX>                                      5,072
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               9,791
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      9,668
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    42,733.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    42,733.00
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4632 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4632

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 14, 2004

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 19504 Linden Boulevard in St. Albans, New York, as the ``Archie 
                    Spigner Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 19504 
Linden Boulevard in St. Albans, New York, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Archie Spigner Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Archie Spigner Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Reuben Ratcliff *v.*F. R. Kitchen.

Boundaries — Natural Objects.

Where a water shed on a certain ridge is adopted by the grantor and the grantee as a corner of a certain survey, such natural object will 'control in the absence of a marked line, and courses and distances must give way to it.

September 16, 1873.

APPEAL, FROM CARTER CIRCUIT COURT.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

The deed under which appellant claims calls to run from the foot of the hill on the north side of Bell’s tract, “N. 32 E. 200 poles to a stake on the top of the ridge between the waters of the Lost Fork, Bell’s tract, and the Wolf Pen branch.”

The ridge or point on which the court below adjudged the corner to be is the only point to be found where the waters run to the *lost*fork, *Bell’s tract and the Wolf pen branch.*This is proved by appellant himself, but to run the course and distance called for in the deed, that point will not be reached. *113There is no evidence in the record that the line- between the points designated is marked, and it may be inferred that it never was actually run. This point on the ridge heretofore described was adopted by the grantor and grantee in the deed to Watson as a corner to his survey. It is a natural object, permanent and fixed, and its location identified by unchangeable and unerring facts. This, then, must control in the absence of a marked line, and courses and distances yield to it.

*Dulin, for appellant.*

*J. R. Botts, for appellee.*

Wherefore, as the judgment conforms to the law of the case, the same must be *affirmed.*
<PAGE>   1





                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1

   
                                 July 28, 1998
    

Source Media, Inc.
5400 LBJ Freeway, Suite 680
Dallas, Texas  75240

         Re:     Registration Statement on Form S-3

Ladies and Gentlemen:

   
         We have examined the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed by you 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
"Registration Statement") in connection with the registration under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of up to 7,102,357 shares of your Common
Stock (the "Shares").  
    

         It is our opinion that the Shares when issued upon the valid exercise
of the Warrants against valid payment therefor shall be validly issued, fully
paid and non-assessable.

         We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and further consent to the use of our name under the
caption "Validity of the Shares" appearing in the Prospectus constituting a
part of the Registration Statement, and any amendments thereto.


                                  Very truly yours,
                                  
                                  THOMPSON & KNIGHT
                                  A Professional Corporation
                                  
                                  
                                  
                                  By:   /s/ Michael L. Bengtson           
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Michael L. Bengtson, Shareholder
#### Harwell *et al. v.*Walker *et al.; et vice versa.*

Gilbert, J.

1. The evidence demanded a finding that the sheriff’s deed to McDonald, considered in connection with the approval by petitioners, together with the quitclaim deed of Mrs. Nicholson, conveyed good and valid title to the grantee; and that the security deed of McDonald to Walker, executed with the consent and approval of petitioners, conveyed *485good title to Walker as security for the money loaned by the latter.

Nos. 6754, 6755.

December 13, 1928.

2. Under the evidence the security deed of McDonald to Walker entitled the latter to the first lien on the property; and this is true whether or not Walker knew of an agreement by McDonald to resell the property to petitioners. Such resale was necessarily subject to the Walker deed. The lien of McDonald is secondary to that of Walker.

3. For the above reasons the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial on the motion of Walker.

4. Since one verdict was directed covering the entire case, the above rulings are controlling and require the verdict as a whole to be set aside, and that a new trial of the case be had in accordance with the rulings now made.

5. The judgment overruling the demurrer of'Walker was not erroneous.

*Judgment reversed on the cross-hill of exceptions; main hill of exceptions dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*489
      *Noel P. Parle,*for plaintiffs.

*E. B. Lambert*and *Miles W.*Lewis, for defendants.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Magnitude Information Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Form 10-Q"),
I, Rudolf Hauke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, as of the date
hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge, that the
Company's Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Form 10-Q, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      May 18, 2009
                  /s/
                  Rudolf
      HaukeRudolf
      HaukePresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          547,610
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,510
<OTHER-SE>                                   (612,120)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,445)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,445)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,445)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>