alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                           7,624
<SECURITIES>                                       600
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     41,265
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,288
<PP&E>                                          39,908
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,853
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            88
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,848
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,762
<SALES>                                         48,202
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,202
<CGS>                                           35,916
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    970
<INCOME-TAX>                                       364
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                606
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       606
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 2.2
 STOCK PURCHASE AND
SALE AGREEMENT
     Acquisition of Interests.
   Closing Date
 Representations and Warranties of MLG
 Capitalization




---



##### 



Ownership of Share Capital
 Solvency
 Mutual Representations and Warranties of MLG and BHC
 Organization; Powers.
 Authorization; Enforceability.
   Governmental Approvals; No Conflicts
   Representations and Warranties of MLBUSA
 Organization; Powers.
 Authorization; Enforceability.
  2




---



##### 



Governmental Approvals; No Conflicts
   Certain Covenants
 Tax Matters
  Further Assurances
 Miscellaneous
 Counterparts
 Governing Law
 Expenses
 Successors and Assigns
 Headings; Definitions
 3




---



##### 



Amendments and Waivers
 Entire Agreement
 [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
 4




---



##### 



MERRILL LYNCH GROUP, INC.By:
    /s/ Gregory L. CurlName:
    Gregory L. CurlTitle:
    President BANA HOLDING CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Joe L. PriceName:
    Joe L. PriceTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer MERRILL LYNCH BANK USABy:
    /s/ Allen G. Braithwaite, IIIName:
    Allen G. Braithwaite, IIITitle:
    Chairman & Chief Executive Officer 5
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of

- )

)

ANHAM FZCO ) ASBCA Nos. 62210, 62211

)

Under Contract No. SPM300

- 12

- D

- 3571 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Richard P. Rector, Esq.

Ryan P. Carpenter, Esq.

Dawn E. Stern

, Esq.

DLA Piper LLC (US)

Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

DLA Chief Trial Attorney

J. Maxwell Carrion, Esq.

Katherine B. McCulloch

, Esq.

Steven C. Herrera, Esq.

Trial Attorneys

DLA Troop Support

Philadelphia, PA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: July 2 2 , 2021

KENNETH D. WOODROW

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 62210, 62211

, Appeals of ANHAM

FZCO, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: July 22, 2021

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibitf 4.12
 



 


HIBERNIA CORPORATION


BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTIONS


Actions in Connection With Long-Term Incentive Plan, 2003 Long-Term


Incentive Compensation Plan and 1993 Director Stock Option Plan


 


Whereas, Hibernia Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Long-Term Incentive Plan, the 2003 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan and the 1993 Director Stock Option Plan (the “Plans”);


 


Whereas, the Company has entered into that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of March 6, 2005, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of September 6, 2005 by and between the Company and Capital One Financial Corporation (“Capital One”), pursuant to which the Company has agreed to merge with and into Capital One (the “Merger”);


 


Whereas, the Company and Capital One expect the Merger to be effective November 16, 2005 (such date, or such later date on which the Merger becomes effective, the “Effective Time”);


 


Whereas, prior to the amendment of the original Agreement and Plan of Merger, the Board of Directors previously took certain actions in connection with each of the Plans to address the Merger and the transactions contemplated thereby;


 


Whereas, the Board of Directors now desires to confirm that such actions apply to the Agreement and Plan of Merger as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of September 6, 2005;


 


Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved, that any reference to the Merger Agreement in the resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors on August 24, 2005 with respect to the Plans shall and hereby does refer to the Merger Agreement as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated September 6, 2005.


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


1
SCWC-30205

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

MARYANN ACKER, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,

and

WILLIAM GERALD ACKER, Respondent/Defendant.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NO. 30205; CR. NO. 056042)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna, JJ., 

and Circuit Judge Nacino, in place of Pollack, J., recused)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Maryann Acker’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on January 7, 2013, is

hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The

parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding

scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 21, 2013.

Keith S. Shigetomi

for petitioner

Brandon H. Ito for

respondent

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Edwin C. Nacino

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-30205

21-FEB-2013

09:43 AM
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-11016

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

V.

JOHN FLATO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:13-CR-358-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent John Flato has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Flato has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and 

the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Flato’s response. 

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 1, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-11016 Document: 00513215457 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/01/2015
No. 14-11016

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-11016 Document: 00513215457 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/01/2015
##### 



Exhibit 32-13 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Michigan Consolidated Gas Company (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony F. Earley, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 15, 2005
    /s/ ANTHONY F. EARLEY, JR.Anthony F. Earley, Jr.Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Michigan Consolidated Gas Company A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk August 6, 2009

p0720 

# Order

August 6, 2009

137836

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137836 COA: 285580 Wayne CC: 01-010970-FC NATHAN JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 15, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony E. Applebaum, Chief Executive Officer of Mera Pharmaceuticals,
certify that (1) Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended October 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 3 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2003 fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations
of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


                                     /s/ ANTHONY E. APPLEBAUM
                                     ------------------------
                                     Anthony E. Applebaum
                                     Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

                                     September 19, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Mera
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6633

MICHAEL CATES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BALTIMORE CITY CIRCUIT COURT; JUDGE JEANNIE HONG; 

BALTIMORE CITY STATE’S ATTORNEY; LISA PHELPS, State’s Attorney; 

GOVERNOR LARRY HOGAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01398-ELH)

Submitted: August 16, 2018 Decided: August 21, 2018

Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Cates, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Cates appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2012) complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the 

Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Cates’ informal brief does not 

challenge the basis for the district court’s order, Cates has forfeited appellate review of 

the court’s judgment. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The 

informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited 

to issues preserved in that brief.”). To the extent that Cates seeks to raise an independent 

claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (2012), the 

named Defendants are not amenable to such suit. See Baird ex rel. Baird v. Rose, 192 

F.3d 462, 472 (4th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4471 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4471

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
  To clarify the loan guarantee authority under title VI of the Native 
     American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeownership Opportunities for 
Native Americans Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL GUARANTEES FOR FINANCING FOR TRIBAL HOUSING ACTIVITIES.

    Section 601 of the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-
Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4191) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Limitation on Percentage.--A guarantee made under this title 
shall guarantee repayment of 95 percent of the unpaid principal and 
interest due on the notes or other obligations guaranteed.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4465 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to extend loan forgiveness 

for certain loans to certified or licensed teachers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2004 

Mr. STENHOLM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to extend 

loan forgiveness for certain loans to certified or licensed 

teachers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF NEW BORROWER ELIGIBILITY 

4 FOR STUDENT LOAN FORGIVENESS FOR 

5 TEACHERS. 

6 (a) FFEL LOANS.—Section 428J(b) of the Higher 

7 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1078–10(b)) is amend8 ed by striking ‘‘October 1, 1998,’’ and inserting ‘‘October 

9 17, 1986,’’. 
2 

•HR 4465 IH 

1 (b) DIRECT LOANS.—Section 460(b)(1) of such Act 

2 (20 U.S.C. 1087j(b)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘October 

3 1, 1998,’’ and inserting ‘‘October 17, 1986,’’. 

Æ
#### James Baker *v.*James Intosh.

Replevin — Value of Property — Forceable Taking,.

Where plaintiff’s property was taken from him by torce, the jury had the right to find more than its actual value.

APPEAL. PR.OÍM: 'CLAY CIRCUIT COURT.

February 14, 1873.

*Rodman, for appellant.*

*James, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The verdict in this case is not palpably against the weight of the evidence and there is no error of law complained of. If the jury believed that appellee’s horse was taken from him by force they had a right to find more than its actual value, and that discretion they did not abuse.

Judgment *affirmed.*
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------




                                 CERTIFICATION


             I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

             1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all
             reports on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports
             filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this
             annual report, of CWMBS, Inc., CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust
             2004-8;

             2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken
             as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material
             fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
             statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
             statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the
             period covered by this annual report;

             3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing
             information required to be provided to the trustee by the master
             servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
             for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

             4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
             master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
             agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
             review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in
             the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations
             under that agreement; and

             5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to
             the master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing
             standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
             accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
             Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
             similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or
             similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

             In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
             information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
             The Bank of New York, as Trustee.


             Date: March 30, 2005


                                             /s/ Steve Bailey
                                             ----------------
                                             Steve Bailey
                                             Senior Managing Director
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 16, 2010 

p1209 

Order 

 

December 16, 2010 

141014 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141014 

 COA: 294566 

St. Clair CC: 09-001837-FH 

MARVIN MILLER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 15, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Siebert Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Joseph M. Ramos, Jr., in my capacity as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report
filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the report.

|                          |                      
|------------------------- | ---------------------
|/s/ Joseph
 M. Ramos, Jr. | Date: March
 31, 2009
|                          |                      
|Joseph M.
 Ramos, Jr.     |                      
|Chief
 Financial Officer  |                      

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by section
906, has been provided to Siebert Financial Corp. and will be retained by Siebert
Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 23(a)-Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Nos. 333-04367, 333-42506, 333-04365, 333-122282, 333-04369, 333-122283, 333-179138, and 333-201706 on Form S-8 and No. 333-157364 on Form S-3 of Herman Miller, Inc. of our reports dated August 1, 2017, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Herman Miller, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Herman Miller, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2017.











/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Grand Rapids, Michigan


August 1, 2017
#### Martin MARINOFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Douglas DUNCAN, Executive Officer, Montgomery County Government, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-1066.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 17, 2001.

Decided May 22, 2001.

Martin Marinoff, pro se. Linda B. Thall, Senior Assistant County Attorney, Rockville, MD, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Martin Marinoff appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in Marinoff s action under the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Marinoff v. Duncan,*No. CA-00-2010-JFM (D.Md. Dec. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*