alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


         METROPOLITAN MORTGAGE & SECURITIES CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                (Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                         Year ended September 30,
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                             1998       1997       1996       1995       1994     
                           --------   ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  
<S>                        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        
Earnings:                                                                         
 Net income                $10,327     $ 9,668    $ 8,038    $ 6,303    $ 5,478   
 Preferred dividends        (3,732)     (4,113)    (3,868)    (4,038)    (3,423)  
                           -------     -------    -------    -------    -------   
Net income available to                                                           
 common stockholders       $ 6,595     $ 5,555    $ 4,170    $ 2,265    $ 2,055   
                           =======     =======    =======    =======    =======   
Weighted average number                                                           
 of common shares                                                                 
 outstanding (1)               130         130        130        131        137   
                           =======     =======    =======    =======    =======   
Net income per common                                                             
 share                     $50,728     $42,733    $32,073    $17,288    $14,996   
                           =======     =======    =======    =======    =======   
 
</TABLE>
(1)   All information retroactively reflects the reverse common stock split of
 2,250:1 which occurred during the fiscal year ended September 30, 1994.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28735]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in ABB Inc. v. United 
States, Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-01265-CSH, was lodged with the United 
States District Court for the District of Connecticut on December 1, 
2014.
    This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by ABB Inc. 
against the United States, pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601-75, in 
connection with alleged releases of or threatened releases of hazardous 
substances at a facility located at 2000 Day Hill Road, in Windsor, 
Connecticut, owned by Combustion Engineering. The proposed Consent 
Decree resolves these allegations, as well as potential claims by the 
United States Army Corps of Engineers that could have been brought 
against ABB if the matter had not settled. The proposed Consent Decree 
provides for the United States to pay ABB $31,044,520 as soon as 
reasonably practicable after the Effective Date of the Consent Decree. 
It also provides for ABB to pay the United States $3,148,322 within 
seventy five (75) days after the Effective Date of the Consent Decree.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Kate Bowers, 
Trial Attorney, United States Department of Justice, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division, Environmental Defense Section, Post Office 
Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044 and refer to ABB Inc. v. United States, 
DJ #90-11-6-19963.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, 450 Main 
Street, Hartford, CT 06103. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree 
may be examined electronically at http://www.justice.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html.

Cherie L. Rogers,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-28735 Filed 12-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4577 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4577

 To allow binding arbitration clauses to be included in all contracts 
 affecting the land within the Gila River Indian Community Reservation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2004

 Mr. Grijalva introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow binding arbitration clauses to be included in all contracts 
 affecting the land within the Gila River Indian Community Reservation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BINDING ARBITRATION FOR GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY 
              RESERVATION CONTRACTS.

    (a) Amendments.--Subsection (f) of the first section of the Act 
entitled ``An Act to authorize the leasing of restricted Indian lands 
for public, religious, educational, recreational, residential, 
business, and other purposes requiring the grant of long-term leases'', 
approved August 9, 1955, (69 Stat. 539; 25 U.S.C. 415(f)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``Any lease'' and all that follows 
                through ``affecting land'' and inserting ``Any 
                contract, including a lease, affecting land''; and
                    (B) by striking ``such lease or contract'' and 
                inserting ``such contract''; and
            (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``Such leases or 
        contracts entered into pursuant to such Acts'' and inserting 
        ``Such contracts''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in ``An Act to amend the Act entitled `An Act to 
authorize the leasing of restricted Indian lands for public, religious, 
educational, recreational, residential, business, and other purposes 
requiring the grant of long-term leases', approved August 9, 1955, to 
provide for binding arbitration clauses in leases and contracts related 
to reservation lands of the Gila River Indian Community'', approved 
January 23, 2002 (Public Law 107-159).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1





                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




================================================================================

                        VERTEX COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1
                                       TO
                                    FORM S-8
                             REGISTRATION STATEMENT
                                      UNDER
                           THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

================================================================================




<PAGE>   2

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Form S-8 registration statement of our reports dated
October 24, 1997, included in Vertex Communications Corporation's Form 10-K for
the year ended September 30, 1997, and to all references to our Firm included
in the registration statement.



                                                  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Dallas, Texas
  May 22, 1998
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4
 
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
report dated June 4, 1998, on the financial statements of S-Sixteen Holding
Company and Subsidiaries, included or made a part of this Registration Statement
of Remington Oil and Gas Corporation (formerly Box Energy Corporation), on Form
S-4, and to all references to our firm included in this document.
 
                                            ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Dallas, Texas
   
October 14, 1998
    
 
                                        3
# 1029-JS ELECTRONIC RECORD
COA # 02-14-00459-CR Devin Gardner v. The State of 

## STYLE: Texas COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED 

### OFFENSE: 29.03 COUNTY: Tarrant TRIAL COURT: 213th District Court 

### DATE: 08/06/15 Publish: NO TCCASE#: 1311335D



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS STYLE: Devin Gardner v. The State ofTexas 

# APPELLANTS Petition FOR DISCRETIONARYREVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# "/<wk DATE: JUDGE: 

# ZtAfL &o/r

MA^&^*- CCA#: 

# 1022-/5 CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS: 

### JUDGE: PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR



### ELECTRONIC RECORD
<PAGE>   1
   
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
    



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

   
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this registration statement on
Form S-3 (Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-45067
and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-20911) of
WorldCom, Inc. of our reports dated February 14, 1996, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of MFS Communications Company, Inc. as of
December 31, 1995 and 1994 and for each of the three and two years in the
period ended December 31, 1995 which reports are included in WorldCom Inc.'s
Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated August 25, 1996 (as amended on November 4,
1996 and December 19, 1997).  We also consent to the reference to our firm
under the caption "Experts."
    

   
                                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
    

   
Omaha, Nebraska
June 12, 1998
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4678 

To bar certain additional restrictions on travel and remittances to Cuba. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2004 

Mr. DAVIS of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

A BILL 

To bar certain additional restrictions on travel and 

remittances to Cuba. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS 

4 ON TRAVEL AND REMITTANCES TO CUBA. 

5 (a) PER-DIEM ALLOWANCES.—The regulations gov6 erning travel to Cuba, as in effect on June 15, 2004, may 

7 not be modified so as to reduce the maximum travel per 

8 diem rate for persons traveling to Cuba (provided for in 

9 section 515.560(c)(2) of title 31, Code of Federal Regula10 tions, as in effect on such date). 
2 

•HR 4678 IH 

1 (b) FAMILY VISITS TO CUBA.—The regulations gov2 erning travel to Cuba, as in effect on June 15, 2004, may 

3 not be modified so as to impose additional restrictions on 

4 such travel for purposes of visiting a close relative who 

5 is a national of Cuba (provided for in section 515.561 of 

6 title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on such 

7 date), including by— 

8 (1) requiring a specific license for such travel; 

9 (2) limiting the number of trips to fewer than 

10 one in any 12-month period; 

11 (3) prohibiting more frequent trips by specific 

12 license (provided for in section 515.561(b) of title 

13 31, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on 

14 such date); 

15 (4) limiting the length of any trip to less than 

16 30 days; or 

17 (5) narrowing the definition of ‘‘close relative’’. 

18 (c) REMITTANCES.—The regulations permitting per19 sons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to 

20 make remittances to households located in Cuba, as in ef21 fect on June 15, 2004 (provided for in section 515.570 

22 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on 

23 such date), may not be modified so as to impose additional 

24 restrictions on such remittances, including by limiting the 

25 recipients of such remittances to close relatives only and 
3 

•HR 4678 IH 

1 by reducing the $3,000 limit for all household remittances 

2 (provided for in section 515.560(c)(4)(i) of title 31, Code 

3 of Federal Regulations, as in effect on such date). 

4 (d) ACCOMPANIED BAGGAGE.—The regulations gov5 erning travel to Cuba, as in effect on June 15, 2004, may 

6 not be modified so as to limit the amount or weight of 

7 baggage that may accompany a traveler without specific 

8 authorization by the United States Government. 

Æ
IB 

Union Calendar No. 417 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4731 

[Report No. 108–678] 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 

National Estuary Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2004 

Mr. GERLACH (for himself and Mrs. TAUSCHER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2004 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to 

reauthorize the National Estuary Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4731 RH 

1 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL ESTUARY 

2 PROGRAM. 

3 Section 320(i) of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

4 Act (33 U.S.C. 1330(i)) is amended by striking ‘‘2005’’ 

5 and inserting ‘‘2010’’. 

Union Calendar No. 417 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4731 

[Report No. 108–678] 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 

to reauthorize the National Estuary Program. 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2004 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rosa SORTO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-6419.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 17, 2001.

Decided May 29, 2001.

Rosa Sorto, pro se. Rebeca Hidalgo Bellows, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Rosa Sorto seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See *United States v. Sorto,*Nos. CR-96-251A; CA-00-2109-AM (E.D.Va. Jan. 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 32.2

    Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

     This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section
1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal  Procedures) of
the  United  States  Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other
purpose.

     The undersigned,  who is the Chief Financial  Officer of Cox  Technologies,
Inc. ("Company") hereby certifies as follows:

     The Annual Report of Form 10-K of the Company ("Report"), which accompanies
this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and all  information  contained in the
Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Date:    8-17-04             /s/ John R. Stewart
         -------             -------------------------
                             John R. Stewart
                             Chief Financial Officer
                              and Secretary
#### Abram Stites' Ex'r v. Wm. Howells, etc.

Court Commissioners — Proceeding Against Administrator of Commissioner.

Although a court commissioner ¿nay be compelled to make proper payments by rule and attachment, as he is an officer of the court, this is not the rule as to the personal representative of the commissioner, •since the personal representative is not an officer of the court, and must be proceeded against by action.

Executors and Administrators — Proceeding Against.

Where a deceased court commissioner failed to make proper payments, his legal representative can be proceeded against only in the same manner as is employed for the collection of debts from personal representatives.

APPEAL PROM CHRISTIAN CIRCUIT COURT.

September 27, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

It is not pretended that Abram Stites had in his possession at the time of his death any portion of the identical moneys received by him as commissioner in the case of *Howell’s Heirs v. Howell’s Adm’r and Heirs.*If, therefore, he failed to account for all funds so received in obedience to the orders and judgment of the court, he was to the extent, he so failed, indebted to the parties’ intestate as the officer of the court, and might have been compelled to make the proper payments by rule and attachment. It is different, however, with his personal representative; none of appellee’s money came into his hands. He is not and was never the officer of the court. Appellees’, right to proceed against him, if at all, is as creditors of his intestate and, although it may be that their claims, if established, would be preferred, yet, they must be established and collected in accordance with the rules prescribed by law for the collection of other debts from personal representatives. As the administrator was not an officer of the court, nor in any sense a party to the suit in chancery, he could only be proceeded against by action, and this being done by amendment to the pleadings in the chancery proceeding, or by an original suit, he is entitled to have appellees’ claims properly proved and verified, and the demand prescribed by statute made, before being sued at all.

*126
      *Stites, James, Bullitt,. Roberts, for appellants.*

*Dabny, Winfree, for appellees.*

The court below erred in holding the response of appellees sufficient. It should have been adjudged insufficient, the rule made absolute and the amended pleading making appellant a party defendant filed October 11, 1866, should have been dismissed.

This conclusion renders it unnecessary that the remaining questions presented in the agreements of counsel shall be considered.

Judgments reversed and cause remanded for proceedings herein indicated.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd. at June 30, 1997, and its statement of income
for the six months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10-Q of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd. for the six months ended June 30,
1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         953,412
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  316,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                   224,402
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      25,306,612
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,406,536
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,835,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,822,514
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,835,091
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,617,770
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  345,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,102
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,353,147
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,353,147
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,353,147
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund VI, LTD
has an unclassified balance sheet, therefore, no values are shown above
for current assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>