alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Missouri

413.105. Misrepresentation of quantity or price prohibited. — A person 

commits the crime of false or misleading advertising if, in connection with 

the promotion of the sale of, or to increase the consumption of any 

commodity or service, sold, offered, exposed or advertised for sale, rent or 

lease by weight, measure or count, he or she recklessly makes or causes to 

be made any statement or representation which is false, calculated to, or 

tends to mislead or in any way deceive a person.

413.155. Packages containing random weights to state price per single 

unit of weight. — In addition to the declarations required by 

section 413.145, any package being one of a lot containing random weights 

of the same commodity, at the time it is offered or exposed for sale at retail, 

shall bear on the outside of the package a plain and conspicuous 

declaration of the price per kilogram or pound and the total selling price of 

the package.

413.165. Advertising packaged commodity stating retail price, quantity 

also required on package — dual declaration, requirement. — A 

representation or an advertisement for the sale of a commodity by weight, 

measure or count, whether packaged or unpackaged, which states the retail 

price, shall also contain a clear and conspicuous declaration of the quantity 

in terms of weight, measure or count, to include any size or dimension 

designation. Where a dual declaration is required, only the declaration 

that sets forth the quantity in terms of the largest whole unit with any 

remainder expressed in fractions of weight or measure required by law or 

regulation to appear on the package need appear in the advertisement.
MEP Advisory Board Meeting 

Tuesday, August 31, 2021

Virtual Meeting Only

All Times listed are Eastern Time*

DRAFT AGENDA

4:00 p.m.–4:05 p.m.

5 minutes

Meeting Opening/Logistics Cheryl Gendron, NIST MEP

4:05 p.m.–4:25 p.m.

20 minutes

Welcome and Introductions

Opening Remarks from Chair

Welcome from NIST and NIST 

MEP Leadership

Board and Audience Roll Call

Matt Newman, Chair, MEP Advisory Board 

Mojdeh Bahar, NIST

Rob Ivester, NIST MEP

4:25 p.m.–5:15 p.m.

50 minutes

NIST MEP Senior Management

Update 

Board Feedback and Discussion

Rob Ivester

5:15 p.m.–5:30 p.m.

15 minutes

Working Group Update:

MEP National NetworkTM Strategic 

Plan 2023-2028 

Overview of Afternoon Discussion

Board Feedback and Discussion

Rob Ivester

5:30 p.m.–5:50 p.m.

20 minutes

Working Group Update, Extended:

MEP National NetworkTM Strategic 

Plan 2023-2028 

Focus Group – Overarching 

Resilience 

Board Feedback and Discussion

David Stieren, NIST MEP 

LaDon Byars, MEP Advisory Board

Bernadine Hawes, MEP Advisory Board

5:50 p.m.–6:05 p.m.

15 minutes

Meeting Break

6:05 p.m.–6:25 p.m.

20 minutes

Working Group Update, Extended:

MEP National NetworkTM Strategic 

Plan 2023-2028 

Focus Group – Reshoring 

Board Feedback and Discussion

Rob Ivester 

Don Bockoven, MEP Advisory Board

George Spottswood, MEP Advisory Board 

Agenda Subject to Change

Times are estimated
6:25 p.m.- 6:45 p.m.

20 minutes

Working Group Update, Extended:

MEP National NetworkTM Strategic 

Plan 2023-2028 

Focus Group – National Supply 

Chain 

Board Feedback and Discussion

Mark Schmit, NIST MEP 

Matthew Newman

Mary Isbister, MEP Advisory Board 

6:45 p.m.- 7:05 p.m.

20 minutes

Working Group Update, Extended:

MEP National NetworkTM Strategic 

Plan 2023-2028 

Focus Group – Workforce 

Board Feedback and Discussion

Mary Ann Pacelli, NIST MEP 

Jose Anaya, MEP Advisory Board

Mitchell Magee, MEP Advisory Board 

7:05 p.m.- 7:25 p.m.

20 minutes

Working Group Update:

Supply Chain Development Working 

Group 

Board Feedback and Discussion

Don Bockoven

Dave Stieren, NIST MEP

7:25 p.m.- 7:40 p.m.

15 minutes

Working Group Update:

Executive Committee Working Group

Board Feedback and Discussion

Mary Isbister

Cheryl Gendron

7:40 p.m.-8:00 p.m.

20 minutes

Public Comments/Wrap Up Matt Newman

Rob Ivester

Rev. 8/22/21

Meeting Open to the Public/Registration Complimentary but Required:

This meeting is being held virtually. While the MEP Advisory Board meeting is free 

and open to the public, anyone wishing to attend the must register by emailing 

Cheryl Gendron with NIST MEP no later than Wednesday, August 25, 2021, 5:00 p.m. 

Eastern Time. 

Any questions may be directed to Cheryl.Gendron@nist.gov.

*Meeting was originally planned for face-to-face in Phoenix, AZ. The time of 1pm – 5pm MST has been published in the 

Federal Register, therefore the meeting is moving forward with evening hours for those on the east coast (4pm -8pm). Time 

zone of this agenda is eastern, but matches the published times, MST time zone.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.5



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of MCI WorldCom, Inc. of our report dated April 9, 1998
relating to the consolidated financial statements of MCI Communications
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1997, which report appears in
WorldCom, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8K/A-3 dated November 9, 1997 (filed May
28, 1998). We also consent to the incorporation by Reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of MCI WorldCom, Inc. of our reports dated June 8, 1998
appearing on page 3 of the Annual Report of the MCI Communications Corporation
401(k) Plan for Exempt Employees for the year ended December 31, 1997, dated
June 8, 1998 appearing on page 3 of the Annual Report of the MCI Communications
401(k) Plan for Nonexempt Employees, and dated June 8, 1998 appearing on page 3
of the Annual Report of the Western Union International, Inc. 401(k) Plan for
Collectively Bargained Employees.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
September 10, 1998
Washington, D.C.
<PAGE>   1
                       USDATA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 11.1 - COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
(in thousands, expect per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             THREE MONTHS ENDED, MARCH 31,
                                                             ----------------------------
                                                                 1998            1997
                                                             ----------------------------
<S>                                                          <C>             <C>        
Net earnings (loss):
   Continuing operations                                     $     (446)     $     (878)
   Discontinued operations                                       (1,719)             41
                                                             ----------------------------
      Net loss                                               $   (2,165)     $     (837)
                                                             ============================

Weighted average common shares outstanding                       11,100          11,085

Common share equivalents                                             --              --
                                                             ----------------------------
Weighted average common shares and common share
equivalents (if dilutive) outstanding                            11,100          11,085
                                                             ============================

Net loss per common share (Basic & Dilutive)
      Continuing operations                                  $    (0.04)     $    (0.08)
      Discontinued operations                                     (0.16)             --
                                                             ----------------------------
         Net loss                                            $    (0.20)     $    (0.08)
                                                             ============================
</TABLE>
#### CAPERS *v.*THE STATE.

No. 6870.

December 14, 1928.

*Branch & Howard*and *E. L. Tiller,*for plaintiff in error.

*George M. Napier, attorney-general, John A. BoyTcin, solicitor-general, T. R. Gress, assistant attorney-general, J. H. Hudson,*and *J. W. LeCraw,*contra.

Per Curiam.

The only complaint in this case is based upon the general ground of the motion for a netv trial, on the contention that the verdict finding the accused guilty is, for the absence of sufficient evidence to authorize the conviction, contrary to law. The evidence of the accomplice ivas sufficiently corroborated to authorize the conviction of the accused, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a neiv trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except*

Russell, C. J.,

dissenting. To my mind there is, as to the present defendant, no circumstance corroborating the testimony of the accomplice, of the evidential character required by the ruling of this court in *Childers*v. *State, 52 Ga.*106, and numerous deciions following it; no circumstance which, independently of the testimony of the accomplice, tends to show the guilt of the accused. I am therefore of the opinion that the judge erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4471 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4471

 To clarify the loan guarantee authority under title VI of the Native 
    American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 1, 2004

Mr. Renzi (for himself and Mr. Matheson) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the loan guarantee authority under title VI of the Native 
    American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeownership Opportunities for 
Native Americans Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL GUARANTEES FOR FINANCING FOR TRIBAL HOUSING ACTIVITIES.

    Section 601 of the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-
Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4191) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Limitation on Percentage.--A guarantee made under this title 
shall guarantee repayment of 95 percent of the unpaid principal and 
interest due on the notes or other obligations guaranteed.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1 Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(b) and section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  18 U.S.C. Section 1350   I,  Tim Hunt, Chief Executive Officer of HuntMountain Resources, certify that:   1. This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of HuntMountain Resources fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HuntMountain Resources.  Date: April 16, 2007 /s/ Tim Hunt ________________________________ Tim Hunt, Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                             NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Novellus Systems, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 27, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard S. Hill, Chairman of the
Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as
of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of
the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: May 5, 2004                     By: /s/ Richard S. Hill
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          Richard S. Hill
                                          Chairman of the Board of Directors and
                                          Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Publication of the tier 2 tax rates for calendar year 2015 as required by section 3241(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 3241). Tier 2 taxes on railroad employees, employers, and employee representatives are one source of funding for benefits under the Railroad Retirement Act.

# DATES:

The tier 2 tax rates for calendar year 2015 apply to compensation paid in calendar year 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathleen Edmondson, CC:TEGE:EOEG:ET1, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20224, Telephone Number (202) 317-6798 (not a toll-free number). TIER 2 TAX RATES: The tier 2 tax rate for 2015 under section 3201(b) on employees is 4.9 percent of compensation. The tier 2 tax rate for 2015 under section 3221(b) on employers is 13.1 percent of compensation. The tier 2 tax rate for 2015 under section 3211(b) on employee representatives is 13.1 percent of compensation.

Dated: November 21, 2014.

Victoria A. Judson,

Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities).

[FR Doc. 2014-28176 Filed 11-28-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
No. 87-6517.

#### Monroe *v.*Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT (10) C

			THIRD AMENDMENT TO 
		  EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


	THIS THIRD AMENDMENT to EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made 
this 29th day of January, 1997, by and between MERCANTILE BANKSHARES 
CORPORATION and MERCANTILE-SAFE DEPOSIT AND TRUST COMPANY, both 
Corporations of the State of Maryland, 2 Hopkins Plaza, Baltimore, 
Maryland 21201 (collectively, the "Employer"), and H. FURLONG BALDWIN, 
of Baltimore, Maryland (the "Executive").

	WHEREAS, Employer and Executive entered into an Executive 
Employment Agreement dated March 24, 1982, which was amended by a First 
Amendment on March 13, 1984 and by Second Amendment on December 13, 1988 
(collectively, the "Agreement"); and

	WHEREAS, this Agreement is scheduled to terminate on February 1, 
1997, Executive's normal retirement date; and

	WHEREAS, Employer has determined to retain Executive in his 
current capacity beyond his normal retirement date, and Executive has 
agreed to do so.

	NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other 
good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby 
acknowledged, and in further consideration of the mutual covenants 
contained in the Agreement, the parties do hereby agree that the 
Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

			FIRST AND ONLY CHANGE
			---------------------

	Paragraph 2 shall be deleted in its entirety and the following 
substituted in lieu thereof:

"2.  Term.  The current term of Executive's employment, now 
scheduled to terminate on February 1, 1997, shall be 
extended to and shall terminate on February 1, 1999; 
provided, however, that at the request of Employer, such 
termination date shall be extended to February 1, 2000."

Page 1


	In all other respects, the provisions of the Agreement, as 
heretofore amended, remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Third Amendment 
to Executive Employment Agreement the day and year first written above.

WITNESS OR ATTEST:                         MERCANTILE BANKSHARES
					   CORPORATION


/s/ Alan D. Yarbro                            /s/ Edward K. Dunn, Jr.
________________________                   By:_________________________
Alan D. Yarbro, Secretary                       Edward K. Dunn, Jr., President
						   MERCANTILE-SAFE DEPOSIT
						   AND TRUST COMPANY


Alan D. Yarbro, Secretary                     /s/ Edward K. Dunn, Jr.
________________________                   By:__________________________
Alan D. Yarbro, Secretary                       Edward K. Dunn, Jr., President


Alan D. Yarbro, Secretary                    /s/ H. Furlong Baldwin
________________________                   _____________________________
						   H. FURLONG BALDWIN



Page 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000064892
<NAME> FDS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,156
<SECURITIES>                                    11,652
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,961
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,403
<INVENTORY>                                     38,205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,758
<PP&E>                                          31,328
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,612
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 166,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,587
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,481
<OTHER-SE>                                     135,868
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   166,645
<SALES>                                        203,368
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               203,368
<CGS>                                           37,461
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  161,087
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    88
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 559
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,446
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,579
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,870
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6416

WALTER STEVE WILSON, JR., Petitioner - Appellant,

v. GENE JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee,

and

STATE OF VIRGINIA, Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:08-cv-00578-jlk-mfu)

Submitted: August 21, 2009 Decided: September 30, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Steve Wilson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Leah A. Darron, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Walter Steve Wilson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wilson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED