alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
March 14, 2008

| |  | /s/JAMES H. MOOREJames H. Moore
Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mines Management, Inc. and will be retained by Mines Management, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 4.33


 


Non-executive director
appointment letter – Mr Daniel T Gilbert


 


The Non-executive director appointment letter of Mr Daniel T Gilbert is
incorporated by reference to National Australia Bank Limited’s Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Commission on January 20, 2005
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, James W. Bernau, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Willamette Valley
Vineyards, Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the
small business issuer and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2005
/s/ James W. Bernau
    James W. Bernau,
    Chief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00434-CR

Zachary Alexander Woods, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

NO. CR2022-095, THE HONORABLE DANIEL H. MILLS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Zachary Alexander Woods was convicted by a jury of aggravated 

kidnapping. See Tex. Penal Code § 20.04(a)(4)–(5). Appellant pleaded true to five prior felony 

convictions, and, pursuant to the Penal Code’s habitual offender provision, the jury assessed his 

punishment at life imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. See id. § 12.42(c)(1). The trial court 

sentenced appellant to the assessed punishment. 

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by 

a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the 

requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record 

demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); 

Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio, 

488 U.S. 75, 81–82 (1988). Appellant’s counsel has also forwarded to this Court a copy of a 
2

letter that he sent to appellant, in which counsel asserted that he sent copies of the motion and 

brief to appellant; informed him of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se 

response; and provided him with a motion to assist him in obtaining the record. See Kelly 

v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. To 

date, no pro se response has been filed.

We have conducted an independent review of the record, including the record of 

the trial and sentencing proceedings below and appellate counsel’s brief, and find no reversible 

error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably 

meritorious grounds for review, and the appeal is frivolous. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The trial court’s judgment of 

conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Smith and Theofanis

Affirmed

Filed: July 31, 2024

Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT 4.13


 


Expatriate assignment agreement – Mr Gavin R Slater
(as Executive Director, National Australia Group Europe Limited)


 


The expatriate
assignment agreement of Mr Gavin R Slater is incorporated by reference to
National Australia Bank Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Commission on January 20,
2005.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FORM 10-KSB FOR
THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             458
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      975
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,080
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,564
<PP&E>                                           3,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,081
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,093
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           357
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,819
<SALES>                                         11,019
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,019
<CGS>                                            8,024
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,177
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  55
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    762
<INCOME-TAX>                                       201
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                762
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       201
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        





</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 5.1



                   [Letterhead of Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue]



                               September 15, 1998

Associated Materials Incorporated
2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 4100 East
Dallas, Texas  75201

             
             Re:   Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to 250,000 shares
                   of Common  Stock, par value $.0025 per share, of Associated
                   Materials Incorporated
                  
Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We are acting as counsel to Associated Materials Incorporated, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the registration of
250,000 shares (the "Shares") of common stock, par value $.0025 per share, of
the Company ("Common Stock") under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
pursuant to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration
Statement").

         We have examined such documents, records, and matters of law as we
have deemed necessary for purposes of this opinion.  Based on such examination
and on the assumptions set forth below, we are of the opinion that, when issued
and delivered in accordance with the provisions of the Associated Materials
Incorporated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan") against payment of the
consideration therefor as provided in the Plan and having a value not less than
the par value thereof, the Shares will be duly authorized, validly issued,
fully paid and nonassessable.

         In rendering the foregoing opinion, we have relied as to certain
factual matters upon certificates of officers of the Company and public
officials, and we have not independently checked or verified the accuracy of
the statements contained therein.  In addition, our examination of matters of
law has been limited to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
and the federal laws of the United States of America, in each case as in effect
on the date hereof.

         We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as Exhibit 5.1 to the
Registration Statement with respect to the  Common Stock.


                                   
                                   Very truly yours,
                                   
                                   /s/ Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue
                                   
                                   Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

91 KA 15-01824
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DIONTE CARROLL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (JOHN GILSENAN, OF THE PENNSYLVANIA AND MICHIGAN BARS, ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE, OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Thomas J. Miller, J.), rendered February 27, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (§ 220.16 [1]). We agree with defendant that the waiver of the right to appeal is invalid because “ ‘the minimal inquiry made by County Court was insufficient to establish that the court engage[d] the defendant in an adequate colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a knowing and voluntary choice’ ” ( People v Jones , 107 AD3d 1589, 1589, lv denied 21 NY3d 1075). Contrary to the People’s contention, the written waiver of the right to appeal, which was not signed until sentencing, does not serve to validate the otherwise inadequate oral waiver where, as here, “there is no indication that [the court] obtained a knowing and voluntary waiver of that right at the time of the plea” ( People v Sims , 129 AD3d 1509, 1510, lv denied 26 NY3d 935; see People v Lawson [appeal No. 7], 124 AD3d 1249, 1250). We nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: March 24, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 3.2
 AMENDED CODE OF REGULATIONS  OF  MORGANS FOODS, INC.
 ARTICLE I  Meeting of Shareholders
 Annual Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Notices of Meetings
 Place of Meetings
 Quorum
 Record Date




---



##### 



Proxies
 ARTICLE II
 Directors
 Number of Directors
 Election of Directors
  Term of Office
 Removal
 Vacancies




---



##### 



Quorum and Transaction of Business
 Annual Meeting
 Regular Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Notice of Annual or Special Meetings
 Compensation
 Issuance of Shares




---



##### 



By-Laws
 ARTICLE III
 Committees
 Executive Committee
 Meetings of Executive Committee




---



##### 



Other Committees
 ARTICLE IV
 Officers
 General Provisions
 Term of Office
 ARTICLE V
 Duties of Officers
 Chairman of the Board
 President
 Vice Presidents




---



##### 



Secretary
 Treasurer
 Assistant and Subordinate Officers
  Duties of Officers May Be Delegated
 ARTICLE VI
 Indemnification and Insurance
 Indemnification
 Indemnification in Non-Derivative Actions




---



##### 



Indemnification in Derivative Actions
 Indemnification as Matter of Right
 Determination of Conduct
 Advance Payment of Expenses




---



##### 



Nonexclusivity
 Indemnification Contracts
 Liability Insurance
 ARTICLE VII
 Certificates for Shares
 Form and Execution




---



##### 



Lost, Mutilated or Destroyed Certificates
 Registered Shareholders
 ARTICLE VIII
 Fiscal Year
  ARTICLE IX
 Seal
  ARTICLE X
 Control Share Acquisitions
  ARTICLE XI
 Amendments
10776.

#### Finch *v.*The State.

Decided November 4, 1919.

Description of this case and the counsel therein are the same as in the case cited in the decision.

Bloodwoeth, J.

This ease is a companion one to that of *Fineh*v. *State,*ante, 339, and is controlled by the opinion in that case.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
10805.

#### Kelley *v.*The State.

Decided November 4, 1919.

Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Greenville— Judge Kevill. July 9, 1919.

*N. F. Culpepper, McLaughlin & Jones,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. F. Hatchett, solicitor, M. Z. O’.Neal,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

1. The exceptions pendente lite can not be considered, as no error was assigned thereon, either in the main bill of exceptions or in this court by counsel for the plaintiff in error before the case was submitted. *Jones*v. *Ragan,*130 *Ga.*653 (7), 655 (71 S. E. 1098).

2. It is well settled that the overruling of a demurrer to an indictment or accusation can not be a ground of a motion for a new trial.

3. The admission of the evidence complained of in the 5th ground of the motion for a new trial was not error for any reason assigned.

4. Under all the facts of the case, including the notes of the trial judge, it can not be said that the court erred in denying the several motions of the defendant to declare a mistrial, because of the various alleged improper and prejudicial remarks of the prosecuting solicitor during his argument to the jury. Some of these alleged prejudicial remarks were proper and authorized by the evidence, and the court specifically instructed the jury that those remarks of the solicitor which were improper were not in the ease and should not be considered by them.

5. While the charge of the court is subject to criticism in several particulars, none of its errors complained of requires a new trial.

6. The alleged newly discovered evidence is largely impeaching in its character, and is not such evidence as would probably produce a different result upon another trial of the case.

7. The rule that in a criminal case the defendant can not legally be convicted upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice does not apply to misdemeanors. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Lube and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, James W. Bernau, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Willamette Valley
Vineyards, Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
 a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the
small business issuer and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2006
/s/ James W. Bernau
    James W. Bernau,
    Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31-29**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Anthony F. Earley, Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Michigan Consolidated Gas Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. (Intentionally omitted)  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   /s/ ANTHONY F. EARLEY, JR. Anthony F. Earley, Jr. Date: March 1 , 2007 Chairman of the Board and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of