alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4
OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         121,673
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               966,676
<PP&E>                                       4,075,798
<DEPRECIATION>                               (329,192)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,911,484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,750
<BONDS>                                      2,004,596
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    425,000
<COMMON>                                         1,208
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,226,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,911,484
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               330,253
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  174,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              72,172
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 95,432
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             85,852
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    80,902
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65
        

</TABLE>
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 11 35

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
So nya Lee Hern an de z
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Nor th ern Dis tri ct of I owa - Ft. Do dg e

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Decem

be r 20 , 20 16 Fi le d: Decem

be r 20 , 20 16 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re SM ITH, BOW MAN, an d B ENTON, Ci rcu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Afte r pl ead in g gu il ty to co ns pi rin g to di st rib ut e m et ha m ph et am in e, So nya Hern an de z ap pe al s th e di st ric t co ur t’s be lo w-Gui de li ne s se nt en ce. Hern an de z’s 1

The Hon or ab le Lin da R. Rea de , Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r 1 th e Nor th ern Dis tri ctof I owa

.co un se l ha s m ov ed to wit hd raw an d ha s fil ed a br ie f fil ed un de r Ander s v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8 (1 96 7) , arg ui ng th at th e di st ric t co ur t erre d by no t de pa rti ng fu rth er, an d by im po si ng an un reas on ab le se nt en ce. Hav in g juri sd ic ti on un de r 28 U.S.C. § 12 91 , th is co ur t af

fir m s.

The ex te nt of th e di st ric t co ur t’s de pa rtu re is no t rev ie wa b l e o n a p p e al

. Se e Uni te d St at es v. W

il li ams , 32 4 F.3d 10 49 , 10 50 (8 th Ci r. 20 03 ) (p er cu ria m ) (ex te nt of do wnwar d de pa rtu re is no t su bjec t to rev ie w, un le ss de fen da nt m ak es su bs ta nt ia l sh owi ng th at di st ric t co ur t’s re fu sa l to de pa rt fur th er was ba se d o n u nc on st it ut io na l

m ot iv e). Thi s co ur t fin ds th at th e di st ric t co ur t di d no t ab u s e it s di sc ret io n in

se nt en ci ng Hern an de z b e c au se it im po se d th e be lo w-Gui de li ne s se nt en ce aft er
co ns id eri ng th e 18 U.S.C. § 35 53 (a) f a c t o r s

. Se e Uni te d St at es v. Mil le r , 55 7 F.3 d 91 0, 91 7 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ) (u nd er su bs ta nt iv e-re as on ab le ne ss te st , di st ric t co ur t ab us es it s di sc ret io n if it fai ls to co ns id er rel ev an t § 35 53 (a) fact or , gi ve s si gn ifi can t weig ht to im pr op er or irr el ev an t f

a c t o r , or co m

m it s cl ear erro r of jud gm en t in weig hi ng fact or s) ; Uni te d St at es v. Moo re , 5 8 1 F

. 3 d 68 1, 68 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ) (p er cu ria m ) (“ [W] he re a di st ric t co ur t h a s se nt en ced a de fen da nt be lo w th e ad vi so ry gu id el in es
ran ge , it is ne arl y in co nc ei va bl e th at th e co ur t ab u s e d i t s di sc ret io n in no t va ry in g do wnwar d st il l fu rth er.”)

. Hav in g in de pe nd en tl y rev ie wed th e reco rd p u rs ua nt to Pe ns on v. Ohi o , 48 8 U.S. 75 (1 98 8) , th is co ur t fin ds no no n- fri vo lo us is su es fo r ap pe al

.

The jud gm en t i s af

fir m edan d c ou ns el ’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is gra nt ed

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
#### Whitman, Receiver, *v.*Mason.

*Pleading.—Complaint.—Mutual Insurance*Company.—In a suit upon a premium note given to a mutual insurance company, the complaint must show that the losses which are to be paid by the money arising from the assessments occurred during the time covered by the policy issued as the consideration of the note.

Same.—Demurrer.—Answer.—It is not error to overrule a demurrer to a bad answer, if the complaint is also bad.

APPEAL from the Perry Circuit Court.

Downey, J.

Whitman, as receiver of the Sinnissippi Insurance Company, a mutual insurance company organized under the laws of the State of Indiana, sued Mason upon a premium note, which he had executed to the company.

The defendant answered, setting up for a defence that the note was obtained by fraud, stating the particulars of the fraud. The plaintiff demurred to the answer, and his demurrer was overruled; and upon refusal of the plaintiff to reply to the answer, there was final judgment rendered for the defendant.

*190
      *R. S. Hicks, H. G. Barkwell, S. E. Perkins, F. J. Mattler,*and S. *E. Perkins, Jr.,*for appellant.

The complaint fails to show that the losses which were to be paid *by*the money arising from the assessments accrued during the time covered by the policy issued as the consideration of the note. Such a defect in the complaint has been held by this court, in several cases, to be a fatal defect.

The defendant was liable only for his share of the losses which might happen during the lifetime of his policy, and hence the complaint should show that the losses to be paid with the money sought to be collected from the defendant occurred during that time. *Embree*v. *Shideler,*36 Ind. 423, and other cases since decided, following that.

It is not material then whether the answer of the defendant was a good defence to the action, had the complaint been good, or not. It was not error to overrule the demurrer to the answer, the complaint being insufficient. *Turpin*v. *Clark,*35 Ind. 378.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4620 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4620

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 6, 2004

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To confirm the authority of the Secretary of Agriculture to collect 
 approved State commodity assessments on behalf of the State from the 
                proceeds of marketing assistance loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE TO 
              COLLECT STATE COMMODITY ASSESSMENTS.

    (a) Collection From Marketing Assistance Loans.--The Secretary of 
Agriculture may collect commodity assessments from the proceeds of a 
marketing assistance loan for a producer if the assessment is required 
to be paid by the producer or the first purchaser of a commodity 
pursuant to a State law or pursuant to an authority administered by the 
Secretary. This collection authority does not extend to a State tax or 
other revenue collection activity by a State.
    (b) Collection Pursuant to Agreement.--The collection of an 
assessment under subsection (a) shall be made as specified in an 
agreement between the Secretary of Agriculture and the State requesting 
the collection.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 5, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 4.6

     AGREEMENT OF RESIGNATION, APPOINTMENT AND ACCEPTANCE, dated as of June 24, 2003, by and among Mississippi Chemical Corporation, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Mississippi and having its principal office at 3688 Highway 49 East, Yazoo City, Mississippi 39194 and a debtor-in-possession in bankruptcy as more particularly described herein (the "Company"), BancorpSouth Bank, a Mississippi corporation (successor to Trustmark) having its principal offices at One Mississippi Plaza, Tupelo, Mississippi 38804 (the "Resigning Trustee"), and HSBC Bank USA (f/k/a Marine Midland Bank), a banking corporation and trust company duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York and having its principal corporate trust office at 452 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10018, Attention: Issuer Services (the "Successor Trustee").
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2022

- 3111

_____________________________
F LORIDIANS F OR E CONOMIC A DVANCEMENT , Appellant,

v.

F LORIDA E LECTIONS C OMMISSION , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from Florida Elections Commission

. Nicholas Primrose, Chairman

. November 28, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R AY , B ILBREY , and L ONG , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Nicholas D. Fugate, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Stephanie Cunningham, General Counsel, and Mattie Theresa Clay, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<PAGE>
March 15, 2005                                                      EXHIBIT 18-1

Michigan Consolidated Gas Company
2000 Second Avenue
Detroit, Michigan 48226

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Michigan Consolidated
Gas Company and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, and the
related financial statement schedule, all included in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 to the Securities and
Exchange Commission and have issued our report thereon dated March 15, 2005,
which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
concerning the Company's change in the method of accounting for asset retirement
obligations in 2003. Note 10 to such financial statements contains a description
of your adoption during the year ended December 31, 2004 of the change in the
measurement date for the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit
plans from December 31 to November 30. In our judgment, such change is to an
alternative accounting principle that is preferable under the circumstances.


Yours truly,

/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Detroit, Michigan
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4086 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4086

  To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,5-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 
      3,3'-[1,3-propanediylbis[imino(6-fluoro- 1,3,5-triazine-4,2-
    diyl)imino[2-(acetylamino)-4,1-phenylene]azo]]bis-, sodium salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 2004

  Mr. Baker introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,5-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 
      3,3'-[1,3-propanediylbis[imino(6-fluoro- 1,3,5-triazine-4,2-
    diyl)imino[2-(acetylamino)-4,1-phenylene]azo]]bis-, sodium salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 1,5-NAPHTHALENEDISULFONIC ACID, 3,3'-
              [1,3-PROPANEDIYLBIS[IMINO(6-FLUORO- 1,3,5-TRIAZINE-4,2-
              DIYL)IMINO[2-(ACETYLAMINO)-4,1-PHENYLENE]AZO]]BIS-, 
              SODIUM SALT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.33.70       1,5-               Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Naphthalenedisulf                                                  31/2007
                         onic acid, 3,3-
                         [1,3-
                         propanediylbis[im
                         ino(6-fluoro-
                         1,3,5-triazine-
                         4,2-diyl)imino[2-
                         (acetylamino)-4,1-
                         phenylene]azo]]bi
                         s-, sodium salt
                         (CAS No. 149850-
                         32-8) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         3204.16.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March      26, 2009 |                         |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                                 | /s/      Anthony J. Miceli   |
|                                 | Anthony      J. Miceli       |
|                                 | Chief      Financial Officer |
|                                 |                         |
NIST-1260

(REV. 4-2010)

ADMAN 5.14 ADMAN 14.03

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY

REPORT OF FOREIGN VISITOR(S), GUEST(S), CONFERENCE ATTENDEE(S)

REQUIRED FOR ALL FOREIGN VISITORS/GUESTS -- 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR VISITORS AND CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 

(SEND ORIGINAL TO IAAO) --30 DAYS IN ADVANCE FOR GUESTS (SEND ORIGINAL TO OSY, COPY TO IAAO)*

Administration Forms

CITIZENSHIP COUNTRIES OF DUAL CITIZENSHIP (If applicable)

NIST HOST(S) (Name, extension, e-mail) ORGANIZATIONAL CODE NUMBER

REASON FOR VISIT OR TITLE OF LECTURE(S)

ROOMS/BUILDINGS TO BE UTILIZED

REPORT PREPARED BY TELEPHONE EXTENSION DATE

FOLLOWING REQUIRED FOR LECTURERS ONLY (including signatures)

LECTURERS ONLY - GIVE BRIEF BIOGRAPHY

DIVISION CHIEF (NAME AND SIGNATURE) OU APPROVAL (NAME AND SIGNATURE)

RESPONSIBLE TECHNICAL STAFF MEMBER TELEPHONE EXTENSION ORGANIZATIONAL CODE NUMBER DATE

LECTURE FEE TRAVEL PER DIEM

$ $$

APPROVED - INTERNATIONAL AND ACADEMIC AFFAIRS OFFICE (NAME AND SIGNATURE) DATE

FULL NAME

First Middle

DATE OF BIRTH

Last Month Day Year

PLACE OF BIRTH PASSPORT

City Country Issuing Country

TITLE/POSITION GENDER Male Female

EMPLOYER/SPONSOR TELEPHONE

ADDRESS

DATE(S) OF VISIT

COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE

Number

VISITOR (3 days or less) GUEST (more than 3 days)

*BOULDER DISTRIBUTION: Original to Security; Copy to Group and IAAO (Mail Stop 1090)

CONFERENCE ATTENDEE (5 days or less)

U. S. PERMANENT RESIDENT YES NO
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D20-342

_____________________________

CLARENCE S. TELFAIR,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Meredith Charbula, Judge.

September 17, 2020

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Clarence S. Telfair, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Barbara Debelius, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### Tripler *vs.*Ehehalt.

Additional evidence to support a point which was the subject of inquiry and testified to, on the trial—such as the degree of injury to the plaintiff in an action for an assault—is substantially cumulative; and a new trial will not be ordered on the ground of its discovery since the trial; particularly where the fact to be proved was within the knowledge of a witness examined on the former trial.

(Before Robertson, Ch. J.,

at special term, February —, 1866.

*610Robertson, Ch. J.

J. The present motion is for a new trial, upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. The action was for an assault and battery; the plaintiff testified that he was 'so much injured by the attack complained of as to be unable to work for some time afterwards. The evidence claimed to be newly discovered is that one of the witnesses examined on the trial, (Hager,) knew, and could ■prove that the plaintiff was at work the next day, and not so seriously injured, and that the defendant was ignorant thereof. The severity of the injury to the plaintiff was therefore, a subject of inquiry and testified toon the trial. It has long been settled that such a fact is not a subject upon which newly discovered evidence is allowed in order to warrant a new trial. *(Halsey*v. *Watson,*1 *Qai.*24. *8- 'C. Col. § C. Ca.*160.) It is substantially *cumulative*evidence. *(People*v. *N. Y. Superior Court,*10 *Wend.*286. *Brisbane*v. *Adams,*1 *Sandf.*195.)

The motion must be denied, with $10 costs.
EXHIBIT 4.2


 


Employment agreement – Mr Cameron A Clyne (as
Executive General Manager, Customer Solutions)


 


The employment
agreement of Mr Cameron A Clyne is incorporated by reference to National
Australia Bank Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Commission on January 20,
2005.
H. R. 4579

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To modify the boundary of the Harry S Truman National Historic Site in the

State of Missouri, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Truman Farm Home Expansion

Act’’.

SEC. 2. HARRY S TRUMAN NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.

The first section of Public Law 98–32 (16 U.S.C. 461 note)

is amended—

(1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and

(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:

‘‘(d) ACQUISITION OF ADDITIONAL LAND.—

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may acquire, by donation,

purchase with donated or appropriated funds, transfer from

another Federal agency, or any other means, the land described

in paragraph (2) for inclusion in the Harry S Truman National

Historic Site.

‘‘(2) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in paragraph (1) consists of the approximately 5 acres of land

(including the structure located south of the Truman Farm

Home site), as generally depicted on the map entitled ‘Harry

S Truman National Historic Site Proposed Boundary’, numbered 492/80,027, and dated April 17, 2003.

‘‘(3) BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.—On acquisition of the land

under this subsection, the Secretary shall modify the boundary

of the Harry S Truman National Historic Site to reflect the

acquisition of the land.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### L. A. Holland, Adm'r, *v.*J. M. Buckner.

Appeal — Record.

The record on appeal was held not to contain a copy of the reply, if filed, to the counterclaim.

APPEAL, FROM McCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT.

October 8, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

Counsel for appellants, in their petition for. a rehearing in this case, say they were very much surprised to see from the opinion of this court, that the judgment of the court below was affirmed on the ground that no reply had been made to the counterclaim, and further say that it was a mistake, and that a reply was filed controverting all the material allegations of the counterclaim. This court can only know what pleadings were filed in the lower court from what appears in the certified transcript presented to it, and such amendments as may be certified and sent up.

The copies of the records on the first and second appeals *to*this court have been examined with care for the reply, and for the order *165noting the filing thereof, and in neither of which can a reply be found, nor an order of the court showing that any was filed. And then the index to each record was examined to see if the clerk had made any reference to such a pleading, but no such reference can be found.

*Petrie & Little, for appellants.*

-, *for appellee.*

Besides, when counsel saw the opinion and learned the reason for the affirmance, it is a strange omission not to apply for a certiorari and have a copy of the reply certified to this court by the clerk of the lower court. Without the best, or at least satisfactory legal evidence that the important paper was filed and constitutes a part of the record, this court cannot act judicially.

Wherefore the petition is overruled.