alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.1

                         THIRD AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION

                             OF SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS

      THIS THIRD AMENDMENT, dated as of November 29, 2005, is made to the
Declaration of Subscription Rights, dated as of October 4, 1998 (the "Rights
Plan") of SkillSoft Public Limited Company (formerly named SmartForce Public
Limited Company) (the "Company").

      WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 18 of the Rights Plan, the Company may from
time to time supplement or amend the Rights Plan in accordance with the
provisions of Section 18 thereof; and

      WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has determined that it is desirable to
terminate the Rights Plan; and

      NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Rights Plan as follows:

      1. Section 1(p) of the Rights Plan is hereby modified and amended to read
in its entirety as follows:

                  "`Final Expiration Date' shall mean November 30, 2005."

      2. All references in the form of Subscription Rights Certificate attached
to the Rights Plan as Exhibit A and the Summary of Declaration of Subscription
Rights attached to the Rights Agreement as Exhibit B to "October 4, 2008" are
hereby changed to "November 30, 2005".

      Executed as of the date set forth above.

                                            /s/ Charles E. Moran
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Charles E. Moran, President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer and Director
#### D. M. Thompson *v.*Caldwell McAfee, Ex’r.

Appeal — Cross-Appeals.

Cross-appeals cannot foe granted between co-appellees.

APPEAL FROM MERCER 'CIRCUIT COURT.

June *24,*1873.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

It is well established by the facts of this record that the resale of the land at the instance of Whittingwill was made for the purpose of defeating the right of the creditors of McKinny as fixed by the *29decision of this court upon the appeal of *McAfee’s Ex’r v. McKinny and Others.*The judgment of the court below setting aside the sale to Thompson the purchase was therefore proper. The latter had notice through his agent at least, who made this purchase for him, of the object the parties had'in view in having this sale made. The court below erred, however, in requiring- the appellees to pay the costs. The party Whittingwill, upon whose application this sale was ordered, and who seems to have silently acquiesced in the sale of this land at $100 to satisfy his debt of five hundred, when it was worth not less than twelve hundred dollars, should have been adjudged to pay the costs. If Thompson has paid the purchase land, sold and conveyed it in his own name and that of his wife, to money to Whittingwill the latter must refund it to Thompson with the interest. As the appellant Thompson is liable for the costs as between himself and those of the appellees who were plaintiffs in the amended petition and Whittingwill is liable to him and is before the court as an appellee he should be made liable for the costs to Thompson on the amended pleading in the court below. The other questions made by counsel for the appellees who are plaintiffs in the amended petition as against Whittingwill, can not be considered on the cross-appeal as cross-appeals can not be granted between coappellees. The questions can only be made on an original appeal. The judgment of the court below is affirmed on the original appeal and reversed on the cross-appeal. Wm. Thompson is liable-for costs to the plaintiffs in the amended petition, who are appellants here, and Whittingwill should be made liable to Thompson. Cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

*P. B. Thompson, Jr., for appellant.*

*C. A. Hardin, for appellee.*
SAFETY PRESSURE
REEF

270"

COMPOUND PRESSURE
GAUGE

SAMPLE POSITIONER ASSY W/
(1) 10 PIN ELECTRICAL FEEDTHROUGH
& (3) BLANK PORTS

19 PIN ELECTRICAL REVISIONS.

FEEDTHROUGH BSATE

1/16 THERMOCOUPLE PORT

S-WAY EXCHANGE
GAS VALVE SAMPLE RoD EVACUATION
SAFETY PRESSURE

RELIEF

(20 LB).
\

PRESSURE GAUGE
VIEW A=A

aan

8 PIN ELECTRICAL
FEEDTHROUGH
(SAMPLE ROD SAFETY
PRESSURE RELIEF GAUGE
é VALVE NOT SHOWN
FOR CLARITY)

PIN

ELECTRICAL
FEEDTHROUGH

8 PIN ELECTRICAL
FEEDTHROUGH

EVACUATION VALVE
WITH NW—25 FLANGE

SAMPLE POSITIONER ASSY W/

(1) 10 PIN ELECTRICAL FEEDTHROUGH
(1) THERMOCOUPLE PORT &

(2) BLANK PORTS

REFRIGERATOR
Sere \ 1/16 renwcyne |
(CsHowN our 7
OF POSITION 0.07
7.09 0.0. —T 1 0
7
1-14.25 00. +
H iz,
\ RADIATION
11.0 00. AL t BAFFLES:
lbs oot I
MULT LAYER | |
I (316 8/8)
twerwocource cLap —Truernac |
ISTRAP(Cu) |
12.0 0.0, AL—| y \ =
\ | zo
1.00 | 1 53.59
t
PA seas on
| — vemountaBLe
INDIUM SEAL
6.25 00. x .125W (AL)
[3.50 0.0. X -035W (AL)
2.5 0.D. X .0B5W
(OFHC COPPER)
34,50
—hoss
NEUTRON ZONE SCALE | (2) 50 onM wound
HEATER & SD SENSOR
THERMOCOUPLE
1.5 DIA. SAMPLE MOUNT W/ 50 OHM HEATER, CLAMP l]
PROVISION FOR SENSOR & f l
5/16-1B THREADED STUD X 0.38 LG J
178
6.07 NEUTRON. ZONE-
2.5 OD. x .o30W (AL) 7.00 (4) 4-40 TAPPED HOLES
: EQ SP ON PERIPHERY
T (800k).
285

97.75

(8) 9.265 THRU.

BOTTOM FLANGE HOLES ON A
7.378 DBC. NOTE: ALL DMENSIONS ARE WV INCHES
JANIS RESEARCH CO.
SYSTEM INCLUDES— CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY [2eatae- ore WLMINGTON, MAL
(2) SAMPLE POSTIONER ASSY'S FOR 500K & | RERETRSRORERErY rE MS”. Toa TNO OPMCAL HH TEU
(2) SAMPLE POSTIONERS ASSY’S FOR 800K SIPRESSED, METTEN CONSENT OF THE Las, LARD TOG] bl hee a
RESEARCH COMPANY, INC. D Oo3-78- OBE] +
Ea ioe eas/ie Tar 13
#### James Holmes *v.*Michael Moore.

Trial — Waiver—Proceeding to Trial Without Jury.

Where a party fails at the trial to except to the action of the court in proceeding to trial of the cause without a jury, and to matee it a ground of motion for a new trial, the error of the court in proceeding to trial without a jury was waived.

APPEAL FROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT.

September 16, 1873.

*Stevenson & Myers, for appellant.*

*Pryor, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

If appellant did not waive his right to a trial of the issue by a jury he should have excepted to the opinion of the court in proceeding to try the case without the intervention of a jury, and moved the court for a new trial on that ground, and as appellant failed to except at the time, the error of the court in trying the case without a jury was waived.

But as appellee failed to pay the amount for which he was bound before suit, and after the action was instituted failed to tender the money, he was liable for the costs and the court below erred in setting aside the judgment for costs and rendering judgment against appellant therefor.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to render judgment in favor of appellant against appellee for the costs incurred by him in the court below.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 18, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20085

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VELIA NAJERA RAMIREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:04-CR-482-7

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Velia Najera Ramirez appeals the sentence imposed following

her guilty-plea conviction of illegal use of a communication

facility, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b). Najera Ramirez’s

sole issue on appeal is that the district court erred by ordering

her to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition

of supervised release. This claim is not ripe for review on

direct appeal. See United States v. Carmichael, 343 F.3d 756,

761-62 (5th Cir. 2003). Najera Ramirez concedes that this issue

is foreclosed.
No. 06-20085

-2-

APPEAL DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4556 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4556

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1115 South Clinton Avenue in Dunn, North Carolina, as the ``General 
               William Carey Lee Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4556

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1115 South Clinton Avenue in Dunn, North Carolina, as the ``General 
               William Carey Lee Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GENERAL WILLIAM CAREY LEE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1115 South Clinton Avenue in Dunn, North Carolina, shall be 
known and designated as the ``General William Carey Lee Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the General 
William Carey Lee Post Office Building.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 7, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  A. F.  Petrocelli,  Chairman,  President and Chief  Executive
Officer of United Capital Corp., a Delaware  corporation (the  "Company"),  does
hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year  ended  December  31,  2002 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                         By: /s/ A. F. Petrocelli
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             A. F. Petrocelli
                                             Chairman, President and Chief
                                             Executive Officer
                                             March 27, 2003
```
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and

Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors

so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 14-BG-326

IN RE: LEE E. LANDAU,

Respondent.

Bar Registration No. 335505 BDN: 90-14

BEFORE: McLeese, Associate Judge, and Steadman and Reid, Senior Judges. 

ORDER

(FILED - June 12, 2014)

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland

disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see Attorney

Grievance Com’n of Maryland v. Landau, 86 A.3d 1271 (Md. 2014), this court’s

April 3, 2014, order directing respondent to show cause why the reciprocal discipline

of disbarment should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding

reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to

this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, §14

(g), it is

ORDERED that Lee E. Landau is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in

the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re

Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption ofidenticalreciprocal

discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s period

of disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully

complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g). 

PER CURIAM
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4632

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

19504 Linden Boulevard in St. Albans, New York, as the ‘‘Archie 

Spigner Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 21, 2004

Mr. MEEKS of New York (for himself, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. ISRAEL, 

Mr. KING of New York, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. ACKERMAN, 

Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. NADLER, Mr. WEINER, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. OWENS, Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. 

SERRANO, Mr. ENGEL, Mrs. LOWEY, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. SWEENEY, Mr. 

MCNULTY, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. WALSH, 

Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. QUINN, Ms. SLAUGHTER, and Mr. HOUGHTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 19504 Linden Boulevard in St. Albans, New 

York, as the ‘‘Archie Spigner Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ARCHIE SPIGNER POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 19504 Linden Boulevard in St. 
2

•HR 4632 IH 

1 Albans, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Archie Spigner Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the Archie Spigner Post 

7 Office Building.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28161]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9919-90-OEI; EPA-HQ-OEI-2014-0820]


Notification of Deletion of System of Records: Confidential 
Business Information Tracking System, EPA-20

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is deleting the 
system of records for the Confidential Business Information Tracking 
System (EPA-20) published in the Federal Register on April 7, 2009, 
from its inventory of Privacy Act Systems. The system is no longer 
active.

DATES: This notice is effective on November 28, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chandler Sirmons, (202) 564-1138.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

General Information

    The Confidential Business Information Tracking System (CBITS) was 
created to track confidential information that was available to 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) cleared federal and contractor 
personnel and other government staff members on a need to know basis. 
CBITS was decommissioned on December 31, 2013. The system has since 
been replaced by the Confidential Information System (CIS) that 
processes, tracks and stores Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) 
confidential information. CIS does not contain or store any personally 
identifiable information (PII).

How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. 
[EPA-HQ-OEI-2014-0820]. Copies of the available docket materials are 
available at www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Docket 
Center, (EPA/DC) EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., 
Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 
566-1744. The telephone number for the Office of Environmental 
Information (OEI) Docket is (202) 566-1752.

How can I get electronic access to this document?

    You may access this Federal Register document electronically under 
the ``Federal Register'' link on www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: November 18, 2014.
Renee P. Wynn,
Acting Assistant Administrator, and Acting Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-28161 Filed 11-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4213 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4213

 To provide uniform criteria for the administrative acknowledgment and 
         recognition of Indian tribes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2004

 Mr. Simmons (for himself, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. Shays, Ms. 
DeLauro, and Mr. Larson of Connecticut) introduced the following bill; 
            which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide uniform criteria for the administrative acknowledgment and 
         recognition of Indian tribes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNIFORM CRITERIA FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND 
              RECOGNITION OF INDIAN TRIBES.

    (a) In General.--Federal acknowledgment or recognition shall not be 
granted to an Indian tribe unless the Indian tribe has met all of the 
criteria listed in part 83 of title 25, Code of Federal Regulations, as 
in effect on January 1, 2004. When issuing proposed findings and final 
determinations on Federal acknowledgment or recognition of an Indian 
tribe, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal 
Register detailed findings on each of those criteria. Such findings 
shall be accompanied by a report under part 83 of title 25, Code of 
Federal Regulations as in effect on January 1, 2004. This section shall 
apply to all petitions regarding which such findings and report have 
not been issued as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Prohibition on Modification of Regulations.--Secretary of the 
Interior may not modify, amend, nulify, or change in any way the 
criteria listed in part 83 of title 25, Code of Federal Regulations, as 
in effect on January 1, 2004.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REVOLVING DOOR EXEMPTION.

    Section 104(j) of the Indian Self-Determination and Education 
Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450i(j)) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.6

                    CONSENT OF PORTER ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES

     As independent oil and gas consultants, Porter Engineering Associates
hereby consents to the references to our firm and to our reserve report dated
December 31, 1997 in the Transition Report on Form 10-K of Chesapeake Energy
Corporation incorporated by reference into the Prospectus constituting part of
the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Chesapeake Energy Corporation to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about June 19, 1998.

                                       PORTER ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES


                                       By: /s/ JOE H. PORTER
                                           -------------------------------------
                                               Joe H. Porter, PE


Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
June 19, 1998
EXHIBIT 21
                                       
                          SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              State of
                 Company Name                               Incorporation
                 ____________                               _____________
<S>                                                         <C>
Beacon Properties, Inc.                                     Washington
                                                            
Broadmoor Park-Factory Outlet, Inc.                         Washington
                                                            
Consumers Group Holding Co., Inc.                           Washington
                                                            
Consumers Insurance Company                                 Washington
                                                            
Lawai Beach Realty, Inc.                                    Washington
                                                            
Metropolitan Financial Services, Inc.                       Washington
                                                            
Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities Company of               Alaska
  Alaska, Inc.
                                                            
Metwest Mortgage Services, Inc.                             Washington
                                                            
M.M.S.C.I.                                                  Washington
                                                            
National Systems, Inc.                                      Washington
                                                            
Southshore Corporation                                      Hawaii
                                                            
Tall Spruce, Inc.                                           Alaska
                                                            
Western United Life Assurance Company                       Washington
</TABLE>