T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. JanetN apol i t ano i s s ub st i tut ed for her pre dece ss or, M i chae l C hert off, as ** S ec re t ary of H om el and S ec uri ty, pu rs uantt o F ed. R . A pp . P . 43 (c )( 2). E ri c H . H o l d er, Jr. i s su b st i tu t ed fo r h i s p red ecesso r, M i ch ael B . M u k asey, *** a s A tto rn e yG e n e r a l o f

th e U n ite dS ta te s , p u r s u a n t to F e d . R . A p p . P . 4 3 ( c ) ( 2 ) . NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GU R DE V S I NG H,

P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v . JA N E T N A P O L IT A N O , S ecret ary, D epartm entof H om el and S ec uri ty ; E R IC ** H . H O L D E R , J R ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, *** R O B I N B A K E R , D i r e c t orof S a n D i e go F i e l d O f f i c e , U . S . I m m i gr a t i on a nd Cu s t o ms En f

o r c e me n t ; RO BERT R IL L A M A S , O ff

i ce r- i n-C harge, R e s p o n d e n ts - A p p e lle e s . N o. 09- 56567 D . C . N o . 3 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 4 6 4 - B T MJ MA ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia B a rryT . M os kow i t z , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r4, 2010

P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia 

# FI LED MA Y13 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSJ u d g e Su s a n P. G r ab e rw a s d r a w n t o r e p l a c e J u d g e Cy n th i aH o l c o mb **** H a l l , now de c e a s e d. J udge G r abe rha s r e a d the br i e f s , r e vi e w e d the r e c or d a nd l i s t e ne d t o the t ape of

or a l a r gum e nthe l d on O c t obe r4, 2010.

2 B efo re: G R A B E R , F IS H E R an d B Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. **** G u r d e v S in g h ap p e a ls th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s d is m is s a l w ith o u t p r e ju d ic e o f h is 28 U . S . C . § 2241 habe a s pe t i t i on c ha l l e ngi ng hi s pr ol onge d i m m i gr a t i on de t e nt i on w i tho utbo nd . H e c on t ends thathi s bon d h eari ng , prov i ded u nd er Cas as - Cas tr i l lon v . D e p a r tm e n t o

f H o m e la n d Se c u r ity , 535 F . 3d 942 ( 9th C i r . 2008) , vi ol a t e d due pr oc e s s . T he gove rnm e nta r gue s tha tw e s houl d di s m i s s S i ngh’ s appe a l be c aus e he f a i l e d t o e xhaus ta dm i ni s tr a t i ve r e m e di e s be f or e f i l i ng hi s habe a s pe t i t i on i n the di s tr i c tc ourt . W e a f

f i rm i n pa rt , va c a t e i n pa rta nd r e m a nd. W e have addres se d the prop erprocedure for c hal l engi ng a Ca sa s bond de t e rm i na t i on i n L eo n a rdo v. Cra w f o rd , N o. 09 -174 95 , -- - F . 3d -- -- (9th C i r. 20 11 ). E ven tho ug h S i ng h fai l ed t o fol l ow thatprocedure, w e c on cl ud e that , gi ven the un i qu e c i rc um st ance s of thi s c as e he s ho ul d b e perm i tt ed t o am end h i s habea s pe t i t i on t o t a ke a c c ountof the B oa r d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( B I A ) i nt e rve ni ng d e c is io n d e n y in g h is ap p e a l. Se e Ar a n g o M a rq u ezv . I

NS , 3 4 6 F .3 d8 9 2 , 8 9 7 ( 9 th C i r. 20 03 ) ( “ [T ] he exhaust i on re qu i re m enti n § 22 41 ca se s i s prudent i al [] ra ther th a n ju r is d ic tio n a l.” ) .3

F i rs t , S i ng h h as no w exhaust ed hi s a dm i ni stra t i ve re m edi es , havi ng appeal ed the i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de ni a l of bond t o the B I A , w hi c h a f f i rm e d the i m m i gr a t i on j ud ge’ s dec i si on . S ec on d, S i ng h’ s f ai l ure t o exh austbefore se eki ng habeas re l i ef appe a r s t o ha ve oc c urr e d be c aus e he f i l e d hi s i ni t i a l habe a s pe t i t i on be f or e our de c i s i ons i n Cas as - Cas tr i l lon a nd P ri eto -R o m ero v. C la rk , 534 F . 3d 1053, 1059 ( 9th C i r . 2008) , w hi c h pr om pt e d the gove rnm e ntt o pr ovi de S i ngh the i ndi vi dua l i z e d bond he a r i ng tha tf orm s the ba s i s of

hi s a m e nde d pe t i t i on. T hi r d, the di stri ctcourtdi sm i ss ed S i ng h’ s pet i t i on i n p artbecause of i t s i ncorrec t a s s um pt i on tha t , f

ol l ow i ng a dm i ni s tr a t i ve e xhaus t i on, S i ngh s houl d f i l e ape t i t i on f o rr e v i e w i n th i s c o u rtr a th e rth a n f i l e ah ab e a s p e t i t i o n i n th e d i s tr i c tc o u rt . As we c l a r i f i e d i n L e onardo , th is is n o t th e p r o p e rc o u r s e o f a c tio n . C

f . A lcala v. H

older , 5 6 3 F .3 d1 0 0 9 , 1 0 1 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . W e th e r e f

o r e v a c a te th e d is m is s a l o f S in g h ’s h ab e a s p e titio n f o rf a ilu r e to e x h au s t a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s . O n r e m a n d , th e d is tr ic t c o u rt is in s tru c te dto p er m itS in g h to file an am en d ed h ab ea s p etit io n tak in g ac co u n t o f th e B IA ’s de c i s i on i n thi s c a s e . T he di s tr i c tc ourts houl d c ons i de rthe m e r i t s of tha ta m e nde d pe t i t i on i n l i ghtof

r e l e va ntauthor i ty , i nc l udi ng V . Si ng h v. H

older , N o . 1 0 - 1 5 7 1 5 ,

-- - F . 3d -- -- , 20 11 W L 12 26 37 9 (9th C i r. M ar . 31 , 20 11 ).4

T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyr e je c te dS in g h ’s a r g u m e n t th a t h is r e le a s e is req u i red b y Za dv

y da s v . D a v is , 533 U . S . 678, 701 ( 2001) , be c aus e the r e i s “ no si gn i fi cantl i kel i ho od of re m ov al in th e r ea so n ab ly fo re se eab le fu tu re .” S in g h ’s s pe c ul a t i ve a r gum e nt , s upport e d byi nde t e rm i na t e e vi de nc e , tha tI ndi aw i l l not a c c e p t h im b e c au s e h e is S ik h is in s u f f ic ie n t to s u p p o rt th e c o n c lu s io n th a t h is det ent i on i s “ i nd ef

i ni t e and po t ent i al l y perm anent . ” P ri eto -R o m ero , 53 4 F . 3d at 10 64 (c i t at i on om i tt ed). T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yr e f u s in g to p e rm it S in g h to a d dan e w c au s e o f

a c tio n , u n r e la te dto h is in itia l Cas as hear i ng , w hen the di stri ct c ourtha d a l r e a dye nt e r e d j udgm e ntde ny i ng the pe t i t i on a nd S i ngh ha d a l r e a dy ap p e a le dth a t ju d g m e n t to th is c o u rt. Se e P la n n e d P a r e n th o o d

o f S. A r iz . v . N

e e ly , 1 3 0 F .3 d4 0 0 , 4 0 2 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 7 ) ( p e rc u r ia m ) ( “W h ile le a v e to p e rm it supp l em ent al pl ea di ng i s f avored, i tcann otbe used t o i ntrodu ce a s epar at e, di st i nct a n dn e w c au s e o f

a c tio n ” ( c ita tio n s a n din te rn a l q u o ta tio n m a rk s o m itte d ) ) . T h e g o v ern m en t ’ s m o t i o n t o fi l e an o v ersi zed b ri ef i s GR AN T E D. T he gove rnm e nt ’ s m ot i on f orj udi c i a l not i c e of

the J une 10, 2009 B I A bond ap p eal d eci si o n i s G R A N T E D . E a c h p a rtys h a ll b e a rits o w n c o s ts o n ap p e a l. A FFI R M ED I N PA R T, VA C A TED I N PA R T a nd R EM A N D ED .