alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      1,150
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                               1,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                   43
<INVENTORY>                                   386
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            3,339
<PP&E>                                    106,769
<DEPRECIATION>                             51,085
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             59,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       5,394
<BONDS>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       70
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       1,335
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                 20,812
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               59,442
<SALES>                                     5,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            5,978
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               6,159
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          1,162
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,343)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,343)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,403)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.20)




</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4572 

To condition United States military cooperation with the government of Bulgaria within the territory of Bulgaria on the certification by the Secretary 

of Defense that United States citizens and corporations are afforded 

full due process of law in Bulgaria and that certain United States 

legal decisions against Bulgarian nationals have been satisfied. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2004 

Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To condition United States military cooperation with the 

government of Bulgaria within the territory of Bulgaria 

on the certification by the Secretary of Defense that 

United States citizens and corporations are afforded full 

due process of law in Bulgaria and that certain United 

States legal decisions against Bulgarian nationals have 

been satisfied. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4572 IH 

1 SECTION 1. CONDITION ON UNITED STATES MILITARY CO2 OPERATION WITH THE GOVERNMENT OF 

3 BULGARIA. 

4 The Secretary of Defense may not enter into any con5 tract or other agreement with the government of Bulgaria 

6 regarding United States military cooperation with the gov7 ernment of Bulgaria within the territory of Bulgaria, in8 cluding contracts or agreements for joint training activi9 ties or the construction of United States military facilities, 

10 unless the Secretary certifies to Congress, after consulta11 tion with the Secretary of State, that United States citi12 zens and corporations are afforded full due process of law 

13 in Bulgaria, which would be evidenced at least in part by 

14 the full and fair resolution of the claims of IBE Trade 

15 Corporation, a United States corporation, for the wrongful 

16 conversion of its shares of stock of CHIMCO AD, a fer17 tilizer plant located in Vratza, Bulgaria, consistent with 

18 the decisions of the New York State courts in IBE Trade 

19 Corp (Plaintiff) v. Iuori P. Litvinenko a/k/a Iourii P. 

20 Litvinenko, IBE TRANS of NY, Inc., and ‘‘John Doe’’ 

21 Nos. 1–10, (Defendants), Index No. 122268/99. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               UT
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      100,952
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     11,218
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          15,882
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         6,610
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,662
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       21,071
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             19,403
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  40,474
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              398
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            42,806
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              11,250
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      277
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  39,457
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  134,662
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       29,462
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               992
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      24,779
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      25,771
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          3,691
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 170
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   3,861
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,414
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,447
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         10
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    1,437
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           944
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,868
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           4,069
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(b)





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Annual Report of EnviroStar, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Venerando J. Indelicato, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:





(3)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(1)
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





September 24, 2010





/s/ Venerando J. IndelicatoVenerando J. IndelicatoPrincipal Financial Officer
```

Exhibit 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cryocon, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Brian Morrison,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ J. Brian Morrison

J. Brian Morrison
Chief Executive Officer

Date May 20, 2003
```
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4556 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2004 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1115 South Clinton Avenue in Dunn, North 

Carolina, as the ‘‘General William Carey Lee Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 4556 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. GENERAL WILLIAM CAREY LEE POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1115 South Clinton Avenue in 

5 Dunn, North Carolina, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘General William Carey Lee Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the General William Carey 

11 Lee Post Office Building. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 7, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-10175

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GARY DEAN POSEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:97-CR-61-ALL-1

--------------------

October 1, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gary Dean Posey appeals his sentences for failure to appear

and for felon in possession of a firearm. He asserts that the

district court erred in failing to apply the methodology set

forth in the November 1, 1998, version of U.S.S.G. § 2J1.6,

comment. (n.3). 

Posey did not raise this specific objection in the district

court. Accordingly, we review only for plain error. See United

States v. Spires, 79 F.3d 464, 465 (5th Cir. 1996). To obtain

relief under the plain-error standard, Posey must show an error 
No. 99-10175

-2-

by the district court which is clear or obvious and which affects

his substantial rights. See United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d

160, 162-63 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc). 

Posey has demonstrated that the district court plainly erred

in omitting to apply the methodology set forth in the amended

version of § 2J1.6, comment. (n.3). The presentence report

states that the November 1, 1997, version of the Sentencing

Guidelines was used to calculate Posey’s sentence. Because he

was sentenced on February 8, 1999, the November 1, 1998, version

of § 2J1.6, comment. (n.3) applies to Posey’s case. See 18

U.S.C. § 3553(a)(4)(A). The approach set forth in that

application note requires that Posey’s failure-to-appear

conviction be treated as an obstruction-of-justice enhancement to

the underlying felon-in-possession sentence and that the two

convictions then be grouped together pursuant to § 3D1.2(c). 

This yields a guideline imprisonment range of 46 to 57 months. 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3146(b)(2), the term of imprisonment

for the failure-to-appear conviction must be consecutive to any

term of imprisonment imposed for the underlying felon-inpossession conviction. Therefore, if, on remand, the district

court elects to impose a term of imprisonment on the failure-toappear conviction, Posey must receive two distinct sentences, and

these sentences must be consecutive. Under § 2J1.6, comment.

(n.3), however, the sum of these two sentences must not exceed

the applicable guideline range of 46 to 57 months’ imprisonment. 

Posey’s sentence is hereby VACATED, and the matter REMANDED

to the district court for resentencing in accordance with
No. 99-10175

-3-

§ 2J1.6, comment. (n.3). His request to withdraw the other

issues briefed on appeal is GRANTED.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT
DATED SEPTEMBER 15TH, 1991



AMENDMENT NO. 1 OF AGREEMENT



This Amendment No. 1 of Agreement ("Amendment No. 1") is effective as of July 1, 1992, between OFFICE CHERIFIEN DES PHOSPHATES ("OCP") and MISSISSIPPI PHOSPHATES CORPORATION ("MPC").

WHEREAS, MPC and OCP are parties to that certain Agreement with an Effective Date of September 15, 1991, for the sale and purchase of all of MPC's requirements of phosphate rock at its Pascagoula Plant ("Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, OCP and MPC desire to amend the Agreement as hereinafter set forth;

NOW, THEREFORE, MPC and OCP hereby agree as follows:

> 1. Article IV of the Agreement is hereby amended by changing the second sentence of the definition
>     of "Sales, General and Administrative Expense" as set forth on page 5 to read in its entirety as
>     follows:

> Subject to the adjustments hereafter described, expenses shall include an annual payment of Two Million and 00/100 Dollars ($2,000,000.00) to MCC for certain services to be provided by MCC to MPC.

and by inserting the following immediately thereafter:

> The annual payment by MPC to MCC for services shall be reduced by Two Million and 00/100 Dollars ($2,000,000.00) with respect to the Contract Year commencing on July 1, 1992. Threafter, with respect to subsequent Contract Year(s), the annual payment(s) may be increased by amounts not exceeding Two Million and 00/100 Dollars ($2,000,000.00) in the aggregate. Payment of any such increases in the annual payment(s) to MCC for services and payments of the "Deferred Portion" (as defined in Addendum No. 1 to Sale Contract Addendum No. 2) shall be made in the same amounts and at the same time.

> 2. Except as specifically set forth in this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the
>     Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

> 3. All capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined herein shall have the
>      meanings set forth in the Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, MPC and OCP have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the 12 day of April, 1993.

|MISSISSIPPI PHOSPHATES CORPORATION
by:/s/ C. E. McCraw           C. E. McCraw
           VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS | OFFICE CHERIFIEN DES PHOSPHATES
by:/s/ Mohamed Fettah           Mohamed FETTAH
           GENERAL MANAGER
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                      |
Cybersecurity protects the conÿdentiality, integrity and availability of your information. 

A cybersecurity program provides advantages for small and mid-sized manufacturers: 

Improve Recovery Avoid Potential Losses Protect Valuable Data Ensure Employee and Mitigate Risks 

Times After Disruptions Customer Privacy 

Reality of Cyber Attacks and Breaches 

of small businesses have experienced a 

cyber attack in the past 12 months. 

of cybercrime victims are identiÿed 

61%

as small businesses. 

of all documented attacks 

58%

targeted manufacturers. 

is the median cost of 

34%

$60K a data breach.

5 Steps to Reduce Cyber Risks 

Protecting the information of your company, employees, and customers is

an ongoing process. Manufacturers will beneÿt from a program that: 

Common Types of Attacks and Breaches 

Spear Phishing

Identity Theft Web Attacks 

Ransomware SPAM 

Defense Suppliers: Compliance 

Manufacturers in the DoD supply chain had until December 31, 2017 

to be in compliance with new DFAR cybersecurity requirements. 

Learn more at 

nist.gov/mep/cybersecurity-resources-manufacturers/dfars800-171-compliance 

Enhance Your Cybersecurity 

Whether you’re a manufacturer implementing a cybersecurity program, or 

a DoD supplier looking to achieve compliance, the MEP National Network 

can help you with your cybersecurity needs. 

Contact your local MEP Center or learn more at 

nist.gov/mep/cybersecurity-resources-manufacturers 

www.nist.gov/mep/ Sources:Ponemon Institute’s 2017 State of Cybersecurity in Small & Medium-Sized Businesses, 2018 Verizon Data Breach Report 1-800-MEP-4MFG mep-national-network Global Threat Intelligence Center 2017 Q2 Threat Intelligence Report, NTT Security, 2016 NetDiligence Cyber Claims Study
Exhibit 32








SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350





I, Dennis W. Doll, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the periodic report being filed herewith containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that information contained in said periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Middlesex Water Company for the period covered by said periodic report.











/s/Dennis W. DollDennis W. DollChief Executive Officer











Date:  March 15, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Middlesex Water Company and will be retained by Middlesex Water Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000837893
<NAME> 88AP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         279,015
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,458
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               329,473
<PP&E>                                       4,842,700
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,180,245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,991,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,991,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,991,928
<SALES>                                        350,539
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               361,574
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  303,751
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 57,823
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             57,823
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    57,823
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
For Lisa, Amy and Warren:

Well done. 

These two are a very good initiative. Hope to heck it works. Not sure a lot of folks will understand the 

ramifications of their impact on agency programs, but some may understand the significance and value 

of using your (and other) expertise to do it right.

Good luck.

—

J.E.J. (Ned) Gravel, CD, PEng, CA-LS, CAE, IPL

Principal

MOTIVA Training - Reaching People

777 Clearcrest Crescent

Ottawa, ON

K4A 3E8

T: 613-834-0712

M: 613-979-6519

e: nedgravel@motiva-training.com

See www.motiva-training.com 

See profile on LinkedIn at https://ca.linkedin.com/in/nedgravel

This electronic mail is intended for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of the message is not the named recipient, you are 

hereby notified that any review or distribution of the message is prohibited. If you received the message in error, please notify MOTIVA Training Inc. by 

return email or phone and delete the message. All staff and officials representing MOTIVA Training Inc. adhere to the published approach to 

confidentiality in the MOTIVA Training Inc Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Guideline at http://www.motivatraining.com/images/stories/Q03_Conf_of_Int.pdf.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                        14
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                14
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         422,331
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      7,994
<OTHER-SE>                    (430,311)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  83
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              0
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              30,282
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (30,282)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (30,282)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.04)
        


</TABLE>