Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 235 / Monday, December 8, 2014 / Notices 72625 

3See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). 

4See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2). 

5See id. 

6See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

7 In these preliminary results, the Department 

applied the assessment rate calculation 

methodology adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: 

Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping 

Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain 

Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 

FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). 

8See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 

Strip from Brazil, the People’s Republic of China 

and the United Arab Emirates: Antidumping Duty 

Orders and Amended Final Determination of Sales 

at Less Than Fair Value for the United Arab 

Emirates, 73 FR 66595, 66597 (November 10, 2008). 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 79392 

(December 30, 2013) (Initiation Notice). 

parties in this review within five days 

of the date of publication of this notice 

in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on the preliminary results of 

this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may 

submit case briefs not later than 30 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues 

raised in the case briefs, may not be 

filed later than five days after the time 

limit for filing case briefs.3 Parties who 

submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in 

this review are requested to submit with 

each brief: (1) A statement of the issue, 

(2) a brief summary of the argument, 

and (3) a table of authorities.4 Executive 

summaries should be limited to five 

pages total, including footnotes.5

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), any 

interested party may request a hearing 

within 30 days of the publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. If a 

hearing is requested, the Department 

will notify interested parties of the 

hearing schedule. Interested parties who 

wish to request a hearing, or to 

participate if one is requested, must 

submit a written request to the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. Requests 

should contain: (1) The party’s name, 

address, and telephone number; (2) the 

number of participants; and (3) a list of 

the issues to be discussed. Issues raised 

in the hearing will be limited to those 

raised in the respective case briefs. 

We intend to issue the final results of 

this administrative review, including 

the results of our analysis of issues 

raised by the parties in the written 

comments, within 120 days of 

publication of these preliminary results 

in the Federal Register, unless 

otherwise extended.6

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuing the final results of the 

review, the Department shall determine, 

and U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries. The 

Department intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of the final results of 

review. 

For any individually examined 

respondents whose weighted-average 

dumping margin is above de minimis, 

we will calculate importer-specific ad 

valorem duty assessment rates based on 

the ratio of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the importer’s examined 

sales to the total entered value of those 

same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).7 We will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review when the importer-specific 

assessment rate calculated in the final 

results of this review is above de 

minimis. Where either the respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis, or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

The final results of this review shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of 

PET Film from the UAE entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided for 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for the companies 

under review will be the rate 

established in the final results of this 

review (except, if the rate is zero or de 

minimis, no cash deposit will be 

required); (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not listed above, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the less-thanfair-value investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent period for the manufacturer of 

the merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other manufacturers 

or exporters will continue to be 4.05 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the investigation.8 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

These preliminary results of 

administrative review are issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: December 1, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Date of Sale 

5. Discussion of Methodology 

6. Product Comparisons 

7. Export Price and Constructed Export Price 

8. Normal Value 

9. Cost of Production Analysis 

10. Currency Conversion 

[FR Doc. 2014–28691 Filed 12–5–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–831] 

Fresh Garlic From the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results 

of the Nineteenth Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Department) is conducting the 

nineteenth administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on fresh garlic 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(PRC) covering the period of review 

(POR) November 1, 2012, through 

October 31, 2013.1 We preliminary 

determine that the two mandatory 

respondents in this review, Hebei 

Golden Bird Trading Co., Ltd. (Golden 

Bird) and Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

72626 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 235 / Monday, December 8, 2014 / Notices 

2On November 4, 2013, the Department 

announced a change in practice with respect to the 

condition review of the NME entity. See 

Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of 

Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Proceedings, 78 FR 

65963 (Nov. 4, 2013). The change in practice is not 

applicable in this administrative review. 

3See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations to Ronald K. 

Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance regarding ‘‘Decision 

Memorandum for the Preliminary Results and 

Preliminary Rescission of the 2012–2013 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Fresh 

Garlic from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated 

concurrently with these results and hereby adopted 

by this notice (‘‘Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum’’), for a complete description of the 

Scope of the Order. 

4See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

5On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

6See sections 776(a)(1) and (2)(A)–(C) of the Act. 

7See section 776(b) of the Act. 

8See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at the 

sections pertaining to ‘‘PRC-Wide Entity’’ and 

‘‘Selection of Adverse Facts Available (AFA) Rate’’ 

for a discussion of the AFA rate. 

9See Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of 

China: Partial Rescission of the 19th Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 

30819 (May 29, 2014). 

10See the Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 

the sections pertaining to ‘‘PRC-Wide Entity.’’ 

(Hejia), each failed to establish that it is 

separate from the PRC-wide entity. As a 

result, the PRC-wide entity is now 

under review.2 We are preliminarily 

applying adverse facts available (AFA) 

to the PRC-wide entity because elements 

of the entity, Golden Bird and Hejia, 

failed to cooperate by not acting to the 

best of their ability to comply with the 

Department’s requests for information. 

The Department is preliminarily 

determining that seven companies are 

entitled to a separate rate. Finally, the 

Department is also preliminarily 

determining that 16 companies made no 

shipments during the POR. If these 

preliminary results are adopted in our 

final results of review, we will instruct 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) to assess antidumping duties on 

all appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR. We invite 

interested parties to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 8, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–5255. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

includes all grades of garlic, whole or 

separated into constituent cloves. Fresh 

garlic that are subject to the order are 

currently classified under the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) 0703.20.0010, 

0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090, 

0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750, 

0711.90.6000, and 2005.90.9700. 

Although the HTSUS numbers are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written product 

description remains dispositive.3

Methodology 

The Department conducted this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. For a full 

description of the methodology 

underlying our conclusions, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum, 

dated concurrently with these results 

and hereby adopted by this notice.4 The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS).5

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit 

(CRU), Room 7046 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, parties can obtain a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum on the Internet at http:// 

trade.gov/enforcement/frn/index.html. 

The signed Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

versions of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

PRC-Wide Entity 

The two mandatory respondents, 

Golden Bird and Hejia, each failed to 

respond to the Department’s requests for 

information and/or declined to 

participate in this review and therefore, 

each failed to establish eligibility for 

separate rate status. Accordingly, the 

Department preliminarily finds that the 

PRC-wide entity includes these 

companies. Elements of the entity failed 

to provide necessary information for the 

Department to conduct a review. 

Accordingly, the Department has relied 

on facts available.6 Further, the 

Department finds that the PRC-wide 

entity failed to cooperate by not acting 

to the best of its ability to comply with 

a request for information. Therefore, 

pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act, 

the Department used an adverse 

inference when selecting from among 

the facts otherwise available.7 Thus, the 

Department relied on AFA in order to 

determine a margin for the PRC-wide 

entity, pursuant to sections 776(a)(1), 

776(a)(2)(A), (B), (C) and 776(b) of the 

Act.8

On May 29, 2014, the Department 

rescinded this review for companies for 

whom requests for review were 

withdrawn and which had a separate 

rate from a prior segment of this 

proceeding.9 The Department finds that 

92 of the companies whose review 

requests were withdrawn had not been 

assigned a separate rate from a prior 

segment of the proceeding, and thus are 

considered part of the PRC-wide entity. 

Further, an additional 30 companies for 

which a review was requested, and not 

withdrawn, did not file a separate rate 

application or certification, nor did they 

file a no shipments certification.10

Accordingly, because these companies 

did not demonstrate their eligibility for 

a separate rate, the Department 

preliminarily determines that they are 

also part of the PRC-wide entity. A full 

list of companies preliminarily 

determined to be part of the PRC-wide 

entity can be found in Appendix II. 

Preliminary Determination of Separate 

Rates for Non-Selected Companies 

In accordance with section 

777A(c)(2)(B) of the Act, the Department 

employed a limited examination 

methodology, as it determined that it 

would not be practicable to examine 

individually all companies for which a 

review request was made. There were 

seven exporters of subject merchandise 

from the PRC that have demonstrated 

their eligibility for a separate rate but 

which were not selected for individual 

examination in this review. These seven 

exporters of subject merchandise that 

have demonstrated their eligibility for a 

separate rate, but which were not 

selected for an individual examination 

in this review are: Chengwu County 

Yuanxiang Industry & Commerce Co, 

Ltd.; Jinxiang Richfar Fruits and 

Vegetables Co., Ltd.; Qingdao Lianghe 

International Trade Co., Ltd., Shandong 

Chenhe International Trading Co., Ltd.; 

Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Trading 

Co., Ltd.; Weifang Hongqiao 

International Logistics Co., Ltd.; and 

XuZhou Simple Garlic Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

Neither the Act nor the Department’s 

regulations address the establishment of 

the rate applied to individual 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 235 / Monday, December 8, 2014 / Notices 72627 

11See Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of 

the 18th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 

2011–2012, 79 FR 36721 (June 30, 2014) (2011–2012 

Garlic Final). 

See also Multilayered Wood Flooring From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 76 FR 64318 

(October 18, 2011). 

12The Department notes that Jinxiang Merry 

Vegetable Co., Ltd. and Cangshan Qingshui 

Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd., companies who 

participated in the November 1, 2012, to April 30, 

2013 new shipper review (see, e.g., Fresh Garlic 

From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results 

of the Semiannual Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review of Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd. and 

Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.; 

2012–2013, 79 FR 62103 (October 16, 2014)) 

certified that it had not shipments between May 1, 

2013 and October 31, 2013. 

13See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011); see also 

‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section below. 

14See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and (d)(1). 

15See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2). 

16See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

17 Id. 

18See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

19For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 

(October 24, 2011). 

companies not selected for examination 

where the Department limited its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. The Department’s practice in cases 

involving limited selection based on 

exporters accounting for the largest 

volumes of trade has been to look to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, 

which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in an 

investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the 

Act instructs the Department to use 

rates established for individually 

investigated producers and exporters, 

excluding any rates that are zero, de 

minimis, or based entirely on facts 

available in investigations. Section 

735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides that, 

where all rates are zero, de minimis, or 

based entirely on facts available, the 

Department may use ‘‘any reasonable 

method’’ for assigning a rate to nonexamined respondents. The weightedaverage margin preliminarily 

determined for the individuallyexamined respondents in this review is 

based entirely on facts available. For the 

preliminary results, the Department has 

preliminarily determined to assign a 

rate of 1.82 U.S. dollars per kilogram, 

which is the rate for separate rate 

companies for the most recently 

completed (18th) administrative 

review.11

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

The companies listed in Appendix I 

timely filed ‘‘no shipment’’ 

certifications stating that they had no 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR.12 Consistent with its practice, 

the Department asked CBP to conduct a 

query of potential shipments made by 

these companies. CBP did not provide 

evidence that contradicted the parties’ 

no shipment claims. Based on the 

certifications by these companies and 

our analysis of CBP information, we 

preliminarily determine that the 

companies listed in Appendix I did not 

have any reviewable transactions during 

the POR. In addition, the Department 

finds that consistent with its refinement 

to its assessment practice in non-market 

economy (NME) cases, further discussed 

below, it is appropriate not to rescind 

the review in part in these 

circumstances but to complete the 

review with respect to these 16 

companies and issue appropriate 

instructions to CBP based on the final 

results of the review.13

Preliminary Results of Review 

Regarding the administrative review, 

the Department preliminarily 

determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

period November 1, 2012, through 

October 31, 2013: 

Exporter 

Weightedaverage 

margin 

(dollars per 

kilogram) 

Chengwu County Yuanxiang Industry & Commerce Co., Ltd 1.82 

Jinxiang Richfar Fruits & Vegetables Co., Ltd ....................... 1.82 

Qingdao Lianghe International 

Trade Co., Ltd ....................... 1.82 

Shandong Chenhe International 

Trading Co., Ltd .................... 1.82 

Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial 

Co., Ltd ................................. 1.82 

Weifang Hongqiao International 

Logistics Co., Ltd .................. 1.82 

XuZhou Simple Garlic Industry 

Co., Ltd ................................. 1.82 

PRC-Wide Rate ........................ 4.71 

Public Comment & Opportunity To 

Request a Hearing 

Unless otherwise notified by the 

Department, interested parties may 

submit written comments (case briefs) 

no later than 30 days after the date of 

publication of these preliminary results 

of review and rebuttal comments 

(rebuttal briefs) within five days after 

the time limit for filing case briefs.14

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(d)(2), 

rebuttal briefs must be limited to issues 

raised in the case briefs. Parties who 

submit arguments are requested to 

submit with the argument: (1) A 

statement of the issue; (2) a brief 

summary of the argument; and, (3) a 

table of authorities.15

Any interested party may request a 

hearing within 30 days of publication of 

this notice.16 Hearing requests should 

contain the following information: (1) 

The party’s name, address, and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of the issues 

to be discussed. Oral presentations will 

be limited to issues raised in the case 

and rebuttal briefs.17 If a party requests 

a hearing, the Department will inform 

parties of the scheduled date for the 

hearing which will be held at the U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230, at a time and 

location to be determined. Parties 

should confirm by telephone the date, 

time, and location of the hearing. 

The Department intends to issue the 

final results of this review, including 

the results of its analysis of the issues 

raised in any written briefs, not later 

than 120 days after the date of 

publication of this notice, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, the 

Department will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review.18 The Department will direct 

CBP to assess rates based on the per-unit 

(i.e., per kilogram) amount on each 

entry of the subject merchandise during 

the POR. The Department intends to 

issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 

days after the publication date of the 

final results of review. 

Also, the Department announced a 

refinement to its assessment practice in 

NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement 

in practice, for merchandise that was 

not reported in the U.S. sales databases 

submitted by an exporter individually 

examined during this review, but that 

entered under the case number of that 

exporter (i.e., at the individuallyexamined exporter’s cash deposit rate), 

the Department will instruct CBP to 

liquidate such entries at the NME-wide 

rate. In addition, if the Department 

determines that an exporter under 

review had no shipments of the subject 

merchandise, any suspended entries 

that entered under that exporter’s case 

number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will 

be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.19

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, will apply 

to all shipments of subject merchandise 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

72628 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 235 / Monday, December 8, 2014 / Notices 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

the companies listed above, the cash 

deposit rate will be the rate established 

in these final results of review (except, 

if the rate is zero or de minimis, a zero 

cash deposit rate will be required for 

that company); (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters not listed above that have 

separate rates, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the exporter-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

for all PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be the PRCwide rate of 4.71 U.S. dollars per 

kilogram; and (4) for all non-PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the PRC exporter that 

supplied that non-PRC exporter. These 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, 

and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: December 1, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I—Companies That Have 

Certified No Shipments 

1. Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., 

Ltd. 

2. Chengwu County Yuanxiang Industry & 

Commerce Co., Ltd. 

3. Jinan Farmlady Trading Co., Ltd. 

4. Jining Yifa Garlic Produce Co., Ltd. 

5. Jining Yongjia Trade Co., Ltd. 

6. Jinxiang Chengda Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

7. Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd. 

8. Jinxiang Yuanxin Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

9. Shenzhen Bainong Co., Ltd. 

10. Shijazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd. 

11. Qingdao Maycarrier Import & Export Co., 

Ltd. 

12. Qingdao Sea-line International Trading 

Co. 

13. Qingdao Tiantaixing Foods Co., Ltd. 

14. Qingdao Xiangtiangfeng Foods Co., Ltd. 

or Xi Tian Feng 

15. Xuzhou Simple Garlic Industry Co., Ltd. 

16. Yantai Jinyan Trading Inc. 

Appendix II—List of Companies Subject 

to the PRC-Wide Rate 

1. American Pioneer Shipping 

2. Anhui Dongqian Foods Ltd. 

3. Anqiu Friend Food Co., Ltd. 

4. Anqiu Haoshun Trade Co., Ltd. 

5. APM Global Logistics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 

6. APS Qingdao 

7. Chiping Shengkang Foodstuff Co., Ltd. 

8. CMEC Engineering Machinery Import & 

Export Co., Ltd. 

9. Dalian New Century Food Co., Ltd. 

10. Dongying Shunyifa Chemical Co., Ltd. 

11. Dynalink Systems Logistics (Qingdao) 

Inc. 

12. Eimskip Logistics Inc. 

13. Feicheng Acid Chemicals Co., Ltd. 

14. Foshan Fuyi Food Co, Ltd. 

15. Frog World Co., Ltd. 

16. Golden Bridge International, Inc. 

17. Goodwave Technology Development Ltd. 

18. Guangxi Lin Si Fu Bang Trade Co., Ltd 

19. Hangzhou Guanyu Foods Co., Ltd. 

20. Hebei Golden Bird Trading Co., Ltd. 

21. Hejiahuan (Zhongshan) Electrical AP 

22. Henan Weite Industrial Co., Ltd. 

23. Heze Ever-Best International Trade Co., 

Ltd. (f/k/a Shandong Heze International 

Trade and Developing Company) 

24. Hongkong Golden Eagle Group Ltd. 

25. Hongqiao International Logistics Co. 

26. Intecs Logistics Service Co., Ltd. 

27. IT Logistics Qingdao Branch 

28. Jinan Solar Summit International Co., 

Ltd. 

29. Jinan Yipin Corporation Ltd. 

30. Jining De-Rain Trading Co., Ltd. 

31. Jining Highton Trading Co., Ltd. 

32. Jining Jiulong International Trading Co., 

Ltd. 

33. Jining Tiankuang Trade Co., Ltd. 

34. Jining Trans-High Trading Co., Ltd. 

35. Jinxiang County Huaguang Food Import 

& Export Co., Ltd. 

36. Jinxiang Dacheng Food Co., Ltd. 

37. Jinxiang Dongyun Freezing Storage Co., 

Ltd. (a/k/a Jinxiang Eastward Shipping 

Import and Export Limited Company) 

38. Jinxiang Dongyun Import & Export Co., 

Ltd. 

39. Jinxiang Fengsheng Import & Export Co., 

Ltd. 

40. Jinxiang Grand Agricultural Co., Ltd. 

41. Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd. 

42. Jinxiang Infarm Fruits & Vegetables Co., 

Ltd. 

43. Jinxiang Meihua Garlic Produce Co., Ltd. 

44. Jinxiang Shanyang Freezing Storage Co., 

Ltd. 

45. Jinxiang Shenglong Trade Co., Ltd. 

46. Jinxiang Tianheng Trade Co., Ltd. 

47. Jinxiang Tianma Freezing Storage Co., 

Ltd. 

48. Jinxiang Xian Baishite Trade Co., Ltd. (a/ 

k/a Jinxiang Best Trade Co., Ltd.) 

49. Juye Homestead Fruits and Vegetables 

Co., Ltd. 

50. Kingwin Industrial Co., Ltd. 

51. Laiwu Fukai Foodstuff Co., Ltd. 

52. Laiwu Jiahe Fruit and Vegatable Co., Ltd. 

53. Laizhou Xubin Fruits and Vegetables 

54. Linshu Dading Private Agricultural 

Products Co., Ltd. 

55. Linyi City Hedong District Jiuli Foodstuff 

Co. 

56. Linyi City Kangfa Foodstuff Drinkable 

Co., Ltd. 

57. Linyi Katayama Foodstuffs Co., Ltd. 

58. Linyi Tianqin Foodstuff Co., Ltd. 

59. Ningjin Ruifeng Foodstuff Co., Ltd. 

60. Qingdao Apex Shipping Co., Ltd. 

61. Qingdao BNP Co., Ltd. 

62. Qingdao Cherry Leather Garment Co., 

Ltd. 

63. Qingdao Chongzhi International 

Transportation Co., Ltd. 

64. Qingdao Everfresh Trading Co., Ltd. 

65. Qingdao Liang He International Trade 

Co., Ltd. 

66. Qingdao Lianghe International Trade Co., 

Ltd. 

67. Qingdao Saturn International Trade Co., 

Ltd. 

68. Qingdao Sino-World International 

Trading Co., Ltd. 

69. Qingdao Winner Foods Co., Ltd. 

70. Qingdao XinTian Feng Food Co., Ltd. 

71. Qingdao Yuankang International 

72. Qufu Dongbao Import & Export Trade Co., 

Ltd. 

73. Rizhao Huasai Foodstuff Co., Ltd. 

74. Samyoung America (Shanghai) Inc. 

75. Shandong Chengshun Farm Produce 

Trading Co., Ltd. 

76. Shandong Chenhe Intl Trading Co., Ltd. 

77. Shandong China Bridge Imports 

78. Shandong Dongsheng Eastsun Foods Co., 

Ltd. 

79. Shandong Garlic Company 

80. Shandong Longtai Fruits and Vegetables 

Co., Ltd. 

81. Shandong Sanxing Food Co., Ltd. 

82. Shandong Wonderland Organic Food Co., 

Ltd. 

83. Shandong Xingda Foodstuffs Group Co., 

Ltd. 

84. Shandong Yipin Agro (Group) Co., Ltd. 

85. Shanghai Ever Rich Trade Company 

86. Shanghai Goldenbridge International Co., 

Ltd. 

87. Shanghai Great Harvest International Co., 

Ltd. 

88. Shanghai LJ International Trading Co., 

Ltd. 

89. Shanghai Medicines & Health Products 

Import/Export Co., Ltd. 

90. Shanghai Yijia International 

Transportation Co., Ltd. 

91. Shenzhen Fanhui Import & Export Co., 

Ltd. 

92. Shenzhen Greening Trading Co., Ltd. 

93. Shenzhen Xunong Trade Co., Ltd. 

94. Sunny Import & Export Limited 

95. Tangerine International Trading Co. 

96. T&S International, LLC. 

97. Taian Eastsun Foods Co., Ltd. 

98. Taian Fook Huat Tong Kee Pte. Ltd. 

99. Taian Solar Summit Food Co., Ltd. 

100. Taiyan Ziyang Food Co., Ltd. 

101. Tianjin Spiceshi Co., Ltd. 

102. U.S. United Logistics (Ningbo) Inc. 

103. V.T. Impex (Shandong) Limited 

104. Weifang Chenglong Import & Export Co., 

Ltd. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 235 / Monday, December 8, 2014 / Notices 72629 

105. Weifang He Lu Food Import & Export 

Co., Ltd. 

106. Weifang Hong Qiao International 

Logistics Co., Ltd. 

107. Weifang Jinbao Agricultural Equipment 

Co., Ltd. 

108. Weifang Naike Foodstuffs Co., Ltd. 

109. Weifang Shennong Foodstuff Co., Ltd. 

110. Weihai Textile Group Import & Export 

Co., Ltd. 

111. WSSF Corporation (Weifang) 

112. Xiamen Huamin Import Export 

Company 

113. Xiamen Keep Top Imp. and Exp. Co., 

Ltd. 

114. Xinjiang Top Agricultural Products Co., 

Ltd. 

115. XuZhou Heiners Agricultural Co., Ltd. 

116. Yishui Hengshun Food Co., Ltd. 

117. You Shi Li International Trading Co., 

Ltd. 

118. Zhangzhou Xiangcheng Rainbow 

Greenland Food Co., Ltd. 

119. Zhengzhou Dadi Garlic Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

120. Zhengzhou Huachao Industrial Co., Ltd. 

121. Zhengzhou Xiwannian Food Co., Ltd. 

122. Zhengzhou Xuri Import & Export Co., 

Ltd. 

123. Zhengzhou Yuanli Trading Co., Ltd. 

124. Zhong Lian Farming Product (Qingdao) 

Co., Ltd. 

Appendix III—List of Topics Discussed 

in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum 

Preliminary Rescission of Review 

Separate Rate Determination 

Separate Rate for Non-Selected Companies 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments 

PRC-Wide Entity 

[FR Doc. 2014–28688 Filed 12–5–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

Advisory Committee on Earthquake 

Hazards Reduction Meeting 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of open meeting. 

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on 

Earthquake Hazards Reduction (ACEHR 

or Committee), will meet on Thursday, 

April 9, 2015 from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 

Eastern Time and Friday, April 10, 

2015, from 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. 

Eastern Time. The primary purpose of 

this meeting is to develop the 

Committee’s 2015 Report on the 

Effectiveness of the National Earthquake 

Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) 

and to review the NEHRP agency 

updates on their latest activities. The 

agenda may change to accommodate 

Committee business. The final agenda 

will be posted on the NEHRP Web site 

at http://nehrp.gov/. 

DATES: The ACEHR will meet on 

Thursday, April 9, 2015, from 8:30 a.m. 

until 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The 

meeting will continue on Friday, April 

10, 2015, from 8:30 a.m. until 2:30 p.m. 

Eastern Time. The meeting will be open 

to the public. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in 

the Portrait Room, Administration 

Building, National Institute of Standards 

and Technology (NIST), 100 Bureau 

Drive, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899. 

Please note admittance instructions 

under the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

section of this notice. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tina 

Faecke, Management and Program 

Analyst, National Earthquake Hazards 

Reduction Program, Engineering 

Laboratory, NIST, 100 Bureau Drive, 

Mail Stop 8604, Gaithersburg, Maryland 

20899–8604. Ms. Faecke’s email address 

is tina.faecke@nist.gov and her phone 

number is (301) 975–5911. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Committee was established in 

accordance with the requirements of 

Section 103 of the NEHRP 

Reauthorization Act of 2004 (Public Law 

108–360). The Committee is composed 

of 13 members appointed by the 

Director of NIST, who were selected for 

their established records of 

distinguished service in their 

professional community, their 

knowledge of issues affecting NEHRP, 

and to reflect the wide diversity of 

technical disciplines, competencies, and 

communities involved in earthquake 

hazards reduction. In addition, the 

Chairperson of the U.S. Geological 

Survey (USGS) Scientific Earthquake 

Studies Advisory Committee (SESAC) 

serves as an ex-officio member of the 

Committee. The Committee assesses: 

• Trends and developments in the 

science and engineering of earthquake 

hazards reduction; 

• the effectiveness of NEHRP in 

performing its statutory activities; 

• any need to revise NEHRP; and 

• the management, coordination, 

implementation, and activities of 

NEHRP. 

Background information on NEHRP 

and the Advisory Committee is available 

at http://nehrp.gov/. 

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 

App., notice is hereby given that the 

ACEHR will hold an open meeting on 

Thursday, April 9, 2015 from 8:30 a.m. 

to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time and Friday, 

April 10, 2015, from 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 

p.m. Eastern Time. The meeting will be 

held in the Portrait Room, 

Administration Building, NIST, 100 

Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, Maryland 

20899. The primary purpose of this 

meeting is to develop the Committee’s 

2015 Report on the Effectiveness of the 

NEHRP and to review the NEHRP 

agency updates on their latest activities. 

The agenda may change to 

accommodate Committee business. The 

final agenda will be posted on the 

NEHRP Web site at http://nehrp.gov/. 

Individuals and representatives of 

organizations who would like to offer 

comments and suggestions related to the 

Committee’s affairs are invited to 

request a place on the agenda. On April 

10, 2015, approximately one-half hour 

will be reserved near the conclusion of 

the meeting for public comments, and 

speaking times will be assigned on a 

first-come, first-serve basis. The amount 

of time per speaker will be determined 

by the number of requests received, but 

is likely to be about three minutes each. 

Questions from the public will not be 

considered during this period. All those 

wishing to speak must submit their 

request by email to the attention of Ms. 

Tina Faecke, tina.faecke@nist.gov, by 

5:00 p.m. Eastern time, Thursday, April 

2, 2015. 

Speakers who wish to expand upon 

their oral statements, those who had 

wished to speak but could not be 

accommodated on the agenda, and those 

who were unable to attend in person are 

invited to submit written statements to 

ACEHR, National Institute of Standards 

and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, MS 

8604, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899– 

8604, via fax at (301) 975–4032, or 

electronically by email to tina.faecke@

nist.gov. 

All visitors to the NIST site are 

required to pre-register to be admitted. 

Anyone wishing to attend this meeting 

must register by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, 

Thursday, April 2, 2015, in order to 

attend. Please submit your full name, 

email address, and phone number to 

Felicia Johnson. Non-U.S. citizens must 

submit additional information; please 

contact Ms. Johnson. Ms. Johnson’s 

email address is felicia.johnson@

nist.gov and her phone number is (301) 

975–5324. Also, please note that under 

the REAL ID Act of 2005 (P.L. 109–13), 

federal agencies, including NIST, can 

only accept a state-issued driver’s 

license or identification card for access 

to federal facilities if issued by states 

that are REAL ID compliant or have an 

extension. NIST also currently accepts 

other forms of federal-issued 

identification in lieu of a state-issued 

driver’s license. For detailed 

information please contact Ms. Johnson 

or visit: http://www.nist.gov/public_

affairs/visitor/. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES