alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STAEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH SIX MONTH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000837472
<NAME>                        Boundless Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               Jun-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             651
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,034
<ALLOWANCES>                                       905
<INVENTORY>                                     11,750
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,407
<PP&E>                                          17,836
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,070
<BONDS>                                         18,079
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,563
<SALES>                                         40,143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,143
<CGS>                                           33,417
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   309
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,521)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,521)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,521)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.44)




</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

# Mestek, Inc. 260 North Elm StreetWestfield,
Massachusetts 01085



# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER

# PURSUANT TO

# 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

# AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

# SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Mestek, Inc. (the Corporation) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John E. Reed, Chief Executive
Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                      | 
|--------------------- | 
|
|Date:  March 31, 2005 | 
|                      | 
|                      |
<PAGE>   1
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              WASHINGTON, DC 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                            CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT
                         TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                       Date of report: September 15, 1998

                         PENNCORP FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

                                    DELAWARE
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

            1-11422                                   13-3543540
  (Commission File Number)                 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

590 Madison Avenue, New York, New York                      10022
   (Address of Principal Executive Offices)               (Zip Code)

                                 (212) 896-2700
              (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
<PAGE>   2
ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS

        On September 15, 1998, the Registrant issued the press release filed
herewith as Exhibit 99.1 relating to the amendment to the Credit Agreement,
dated as of March 12, 1997, filed herewith as Exhibit 99.2.

ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS

  (C)   Exhibits.

          99.1     Press release dated September 15, 1998.

          99.2     Amendment No. 3 to Credit Agreement.
<PAGE>   3
                                   SIGNATURE


        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                     PENNCORP FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.



Date: September 15, 1998         By  /s/ SCOTT D. SILVERMAN
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Scott D. Silverman
                                     Executive Vice-President, 
                                     Chief Administrative Officer, General
                                     Counsel and Secretary
<PAGE>   4
                               INDEX TO EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT
NUMBER                             DESCRIPTION
-------                            -----------           
  99.1                  Press Release dated September 15, 1998.

  99.2                  Amendment No. 3 to Credit Agreement.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory F. Kowal, Chief Executive Officer of Mera Pharmaceuticals, certify
that (1) Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April
30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 3 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of Mera
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Date: June 19, 2006


/s/ Gregory F. Kowal
--------------------
Gregory F. Kowal
Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Mera
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 4.44


 


Deed of access, indemnity and
insurance – Ms Jillian S Segal


 


The
Deed of access, indemnity and insurance of Ms Jillian S Segal is incorporated
by reference to National Australia Bank Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Commission
on January 20, 2005
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4353

To require the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to provide 

tenant-based rental housing vouchers for certain residents of federally 

assisted housing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2004

Mr. LATOURETTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 

to provide tenant-based rental housing vouchers for certain residents of federally assisted housing.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. VOUCHER ASSISTANCE. 

4 (a) CANCELLATION OF CONTRACT.—Notwith5 standing any other provision of law, upon payment in full 

6 of the obligation under the mortgage for the East Crown 

7 Apartments in Akron, Ohio, that is insured by the Sec8 retary of Housing and Urban Development under section 

9 236 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715z–1) 
2

•HR 4353 IH 

1 the availability, to the public housing agency referred to 

2 in subsection (b), of the rental assistance specified in such 

3 subsection, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Develop4 ment shall terminate the following agreements relating to 

5 such property: 

6 (1) The Regulatory Agreement and the Use 

7 Agreement and Second Amendment of Regulatory 

8 Agreement for FHA Project No. 042–44059/042–

9 10016. 

10 (2) Housing Assistance Payments Contract No. 

11 OH 12L000199. 

12 (b) TENANT-BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE.—The 

13 Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall make 

14 available to the Akron Metropolitan Housing Authority of 

15 Akron, Ohio, tenant-based rental assistance under section 

16 8(o) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 

17 1437f) in the amount necessary to provide incremental 

18 vouchers under such section for 108 families. Rental as19 sistance amounts made available under this section shall 

20 be used only for families who are residing in the property 

21 described in subsection (a) upon the date of the termi22 nation of the agreements described in such subsection. 

23 (c) FUNDING.—Any amounts previously obligated for 

24 housing assistance for the property described in subsection 

25 (a) that become unobligated because of the termination 
3

•HR 4353 IH 

1 of the contract referred to in paragraph (2) of such sub2 section shall be used by the Secretary of Housing and 

3 Urban Development in providing assistance under sub4 section (b).

Æ
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Cynthia A. Scheuer, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mechanical Technology 
	Incorporated;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the

statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements

were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects          the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible

for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and

procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and

15(d)-15(e)), for the registrant and we have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such 
	disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
	supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the 
	registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made 
	known to us by others within those entities, particularly during 
	the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure 
	controls and procedures and presented in this report
	our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure 
	controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
	this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
	internal control over financial reporting that occurred during

the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially

affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the

registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,

based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over 
		financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit 
		committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing 
		the equivalent functions):
		a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the 
			design or operation of internal control over financial

reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the

registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report

financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
			other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
			internal control over financial reporting.

March 10, 2004		/S/ CYNTHIA A. SCHEUER						Cynthia A. Scheuer

Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.6
 
                          CONSENT OF FINANCIAL ADVISOR
                                       TO
                         SPECIAL TRANSACTION COMMITTEE
 
     We consent to the inclusion in this Registration Statement on Form S-4, and
all amendments thereto, of Remington Oil & Gas Corporation of our opinion dated
June 22, 1998 included within the Registration Statement as Attachment II to the
Prospectus and Proxy Statement therein (the "Opinion"), and to the references to
our firm and to the Opinion under the captions "Summary -- The Special
Transaction Committee and Opinion of Outside Financial Advisor," "The
Transaction -- Potential Conflicts of Interests," "The
Transaction -- Proceedings of the STC," and "Opinion of STC Financial Advisor"
in said Prospectus and Proxy Statement.
 
                                            HOWARD, WEIL, LABOUISSE,
                                            FRIEDRICHS, INCORPORATED
 
Houston, Texas
August 13, 1998
#### Anna Clark v. Mary Mitchell, adm’x.

*Costs on affirmance by equal division.*

Costs may be denied on affirmance, by the equal division of the court, of a judgm&nt in a complicated case.

Error to Calhoun.

Submitted. Oct. 17.

Decided Apr. 25.

Appeal from the allowance of a claim against an estate. The administratrix brings error.

Affirmed.

*Wm. H. yGorter*and *F. A. Stace*for appellant.

*Geo. W. Lawton*for appellee.

Coolet, J.

In this case two of the justices present think the judgment should be affirmed and the other does not. The case is complicated and it has been found impossible to reach any conclusion that will settle any controlling principle. Under these Circumstances written opinions could not be of service and are withheld.

The judgment will stand affirmed but without costs.

Maeston, J. concurred.

Campbell, J.

I concur in the entrance of the judgment, as a majority are not in favor of reversal.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2013

t1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2013

147793

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147793

COA: 306987 

Wayne CC: 04-017409-FC

EMANUEL WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 6, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7387

SHAE GWAVIRA WILLIAMS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SEWALL SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA98-1715-PJM) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 7, 1999 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shae Gwavira Williams, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Smith , No. CA-98-1715-PJM (D. Md. Aug. 24, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 15,295.

#### Deuel *v.*Newlin.

PROMISSORY *Note.*— Payable *in Sank.*— Transfer *to Plaintiff Without Consideration.*— Answer.—Sufficiency *of.*— In an action upon a promissory note payable at a bank in this State, when it is averred in the complaint that it was transferred before due, for value, and was taken by the plaintiff in good faith, etc., an answer is good which avers that the note was, and at all times had been, the property of the payee; that the plaintiff had no actual interest in it, and that it was transferred to him without consideration, for purposes of collection only, and to prevent the defendant pleading as a set-off against it certain indebtedness due to him from the payee.

From the Noble Circuit Court.

*L. W. Welker,*for appellant.

*R. P. Barr,*for appellee.

McBride, J.

Suit by the appellant to collect a note and *41foreclose a mortgage given by the appellee to one Hall, and by Hall assigned to the appellant. The note was payable at a bank in this State, and it was averred that it was transferred before due, for value, and was taken by the appellant in good faith, etc.

The second paragraph of answer averred, in substance, that the note was, and at all times had been, the property of the payee; that the appellant had no actual interest in it, and that it was transferred to him without consideration, for purposes of collection only, and to prevent the appelleepleading as a set-off ■ against it certain indebtedness due to him from the payee.

A demurrer to this paragraph of answer, was overruled, and this ruling is assigned as error. The answer is clearly good. *Bostwick*v. *Bryant,*113 Ind. 448; *State, ex rel.,*v. *Ruhlman,*111 Ind. 17*; Pixley*v. *Van Nostern,*100 Ind. 34; *Curtis*v. *Gooding,*99 Ind. 45; *Wilson*v. *Clark,*11 Ind. 385; *Hereth*v. *Smith,*33 Ind. 514; *Lewis*v. *Sheaman,*28 Ind. 427.

The only other error assigned is that the court erred in overruling the appellant’s motion for a new trial.

While several reasons were assigned for a new trial, counsel for the appellant has confined his discussion to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain, the finding.

We do not consider or pass upon the objection urged by counsel for the appellee as to the technical sufficiency of the assignment of the reasons for a new trial.

The evidence was principally addressed to an answer of set-off — the appellee alleging indebtedness of the payee of the note to him before its assignment, and that the appellant took it with notice of the indebtedness. Except for inferences which may legitimately be drawn from the evidence, the evidence, as shown by the record, is very slight tending to show notice. It can not be said, however, that there is no evidence tending to establish that fact. There is evidence of some facts tending that way, while from some cireum*42stances surrounding the transaction there arises a strong inference tending to the same conclusion. It is, in our opinion, a case where the trial court having weighed the evidence and reached a given conclusion, we can not under our rules disregard the finding.

Filed March 29, 1892.

Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Anthony E. Applebaum, Chief Executive Officer of Mera Pharmaceuticals, certify that (1) Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 3 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.





Date:  June 14, 2010





/s/ Anthony E. ApplebaumAnthony E. ApplebaumPrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
OSAC REGISTRY IMPLEMENTATION

RECOGNITION PROGRAM

The Organization of Scientific Area Committees (OSAC) for Forensic Science is seeking assistance to support its 

efforts and ensure proper recognition of forensic science service providers (FSSPs) that have implemented 

standards on the OSAC Registry.

To date, over 125 FSSPs have self-declared their implementation

of standards listed on the OSAC Registry (media releases for some 

of these providers can be found here). Additionally, OSAC has

received public support for standards and implementation from 

seven major forensic science professional organizations (a list of 

these organizations and their statements can be found here).

If your organization has implemented standards on the OSAC 

Registry, either entire standards or parts of them, you are eligible 

to receive recognition as an OSAC Registry Implementer. This 

recognition includes the issuance of an OSAC Implementer 

Certificate. 

If you would like to see how this information is currently used, please 

review the 2022 OSAC Registry Implementation Survey which can be 

found here.

If your organization is already implementing standards on the OSAC Registry and would like to receive recognition 

for your efforts, please fill out the declaration on the Registry Implementation page and send it to 

mark.stolorow@nist.gov. 

For additional information, a list of FAQs, and guidance on standard implementation, please visit the OSAC 

Registry Implementation page (QR Code Below) or contact vincent.desiderio@nist.gov.