alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations
found on pages 1 and 2 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the six months
ended June 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,765
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (822)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,084
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,207
<PP&E>                                           2,318
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,932)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,413
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           144
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,052
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,609
<SALES>                                          2,308
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,308
<CGS>                                            1,462
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (97)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,247)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,247)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,247)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





I, Joel Dupré, Chief Executive Officer of Cordia Corporation (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period September 30, 2005 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report):

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:/s/ Joel Dupré



Joel Dupré

Chief Executive Officer



November 14, 2005









*

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Registrant. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |                                                                                 |                                  |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                           |                                                                            |                             |
| Date:                April 14, 2006 | By:                                                                        | /s/ Alain                Lemieux |
|                                | Name:                Alain Lemieux                                                   |
|                                | Title:                President, Chief Executive Officer,and                Director |
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 439 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 439

 To create a system of background checks for certain workers who enter 
                people's homes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2003

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To create a system of background checks for certain workers who enter 
                people's homes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Domestic Consumer Safety Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. BACKGROUND CHECKS FOR PEOPLE WHO WORK IN HOMES.

    The Federal Trade Commission shall make rules, on the record after 
opportunity for an agency hearing, to assure that businesses in 
commerce that send employees into people's homes perform adequate and 
appropriate background checks on those employees.

SEC. 3. SANCTIONS.

    Whoever violates a rule made by the Federal Trade Commission under 
section 2 shall be liable for a civil penalty of not more than 
$1,000,000.

SEC. 4. DEFINITION.

    As used in this Act, the term ``business in commerce'' means a 
business that is in or affects interstate or foreign commerce.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.2


    

      Scott
        Cabianca

      602-1919
        Bellevue Ave

      West
        Vancouver, BC

      V7V
        1B7
        June 1,
        2005

      To:
        Paradigm Ventures Corp 

      1455
        Bellevue Ave

      West
        Vancouver, BC

      V7V
        1B7

      


      RE:
        Loan Agreement

      


      I
        Scott
        Cabianca hereby agree to loan Paradigm Ventures Corp the sum of USDS
        125,000.00 (ONE HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS) at an interest rate
        of 5%
        per annum for a period of 2 years (June 1, 2007), The loan will be provided
        at
        the behest of Paradigm Ventures Corp
        anytime
        during this period. The funds will be used to finance the second phase of
        Paradigm proposed work program on the Sheep Mountain Prospect, and any other
        business costs during this period. The loan is a demand loan and can be repaid
        at anytime.

      


      Accepted.
        by:

       

       

      
        	
                /s/
                  Scott Cabianca

                
                  
Scott
                  Cabianca 

              
	 
	and 
	 
	
                /s/
                  Paradingm Vetures Corp.

                
                  

                
Paradingm Vetures Corp.
#### Kohler, Appellant, *v.*Sears, Roebuck & Co., Appellee.

(No. 2017

— Decided April 6, 1949.)

*Messrs. Harshman & Young,*for appellant.

*Messrs. PicJcrel, Schaeffer dt Ebeling,*for appellee.

By the Court.

This is an appeal on questions of law from the judgment of the Common Pleas Court, Montgomery county, in favor of the plaintiff, appellant herein, for the sum of $70 in an action growing out of a contract of employment.

Plaintiff claims the sum of $1,135 was due him as commission . earned by him on sales of merchandise while an employee of Sears, Boebuck *&*Company. Upon trial the defendant admitted its indebtedness in the sum of $70.

*96The plaintiff assigns as error that the judgment of the trial court is not sustained by sufficient evidence, that the judgment is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence and that it is contrary to law.

The determinative issue in this case is entirely factual. The plaintiff contends that he was entitled to commission for merchandise sold by him during the time he was employed by the defendant company even though such merchandise was delivered after the termination of his employment. The defendant contends that the contract of employment provided that the plaintiff should be compensated for his services on the basis of sales shown on the merchandise condition report and that no sales appeared on this report until the merchandise was delivered; and that because of the peculiar nature of the plaintiff’s services, and the fact that he was in charge of a department which engaged in bulk sales, consisting of large orders of merchandise sold to the federal government and the armed forces of the United States which were subject to cancellation, he was informed and it was agreed, that his commission on such orders would be based on sales made and delivered during the period of his employment.

The trial court resolved this issue in favor of the defendant. After a careful examination of the entire record in this case, we find that there is ample evidence to support the judgment of the trial court.

In our opinion the judgment is sustained by sufficient evidence, is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence and is not contrary to law. Finding no error in the record prejudicial to the plaintiff the judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Miller, P. J., Hornbeck and Wiseman, JJ., concur.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4470

AN ACT

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act

gram from fiscal year 2005 to 2010.the Lake Pontchartrain Basin Restoration Proto extend the authorization of appropriations for

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4470

AN ACT

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to extend

the authorization of appropriations for the Lake Pontchartrain Basin Restoration Program from fiscal year

2005 to 2010.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4470 EH

1 SECTION 1. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN RESTORATION PRO2 GRAM.

3 (a) STAKEHOLDERS CONFERENCE.—For purposes of

4 carrying out section 121 of the Federal Water Pollution

5 Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273), the Lake Pontchartrain,

6 Louisiana, basin stakeholders conference convened on

7 February 25, 2002, shall be treated as being a manage8 ment conference convened under section 320 of such Act

9 (33 U.S.C. 1330).

10 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—The first

11 sentence of section 121(f)(1) of the Federal Water Pollu12 tion Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273(f)(1)) is amended by

13 inserting before the period at the end the following: ‘‘,

14 $19,000,000 for fiscal year 2006, and $20,000,000 for

15 each of fiscal years 2007 through 2010’’.

16 SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTION.

17 The second section 121 of the Federal Water Pollu18 tion Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1274; relating to wet weather

19 watershed projects) is redesignated as section 122.

Passed the House of Representatives October 7 (legislative day, October 6), 2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.7

                        [RYDER SCOTT COMPANY LETTERHEAD]

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


         We hereby consent to (i) the incorporation by reference in the
Prospectus (the "Prospectus") constituting a part of the Registration Statement
on Form S-3 filed by Queen Sand Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), under the Securities Act of 1933, of information contained in our
reserve report relating to the proved oil and natural gas reserves and future
net revenues of oil and natural gas reserves of the Company at December 31,
1997 with respect to the Morgan Properties (as defined in the Prospectus) and
all references to such report letters and/or this firm in such Prospectus and
(ii) further consent to our being named as an expert therein in the section
titled "Experts."

                                        /s/ Ryder Scott Company
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Petroleum Engineers
                                        ------------------------------

                                        RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                        PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit** ___________________________ No. 16-1679 ___________________________ Luis A. Munoz Elizarraraz

lllllllllllllllllllll Petitioner v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III, 1 Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent ____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ____________ Submitted: May 30, 2017 Filed: June 2, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. 1 Jefferson B. Sessions, III has been appointed to serve as Attorney General of the United States, and is substituted as respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c).Mexican citizen Luis A. Munoz Elizarrar az petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s decision to deny his application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture. 2 Having jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, this court, after careful consideration, concludes that substantial ev idence supports the denial of relief. The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

2 Munoz Elizarraraz does not challenge the denial of asylum. -2-
Exhibit
4(f)

FEE WAIVER AGREEMENT

 THIS FEE WAIVER
AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is signed as of
October 31, 2005 by Fund Asset Management, L.P. (the
"Investment Adviser") and Merrill Lynch Focus
Value Fund, Inc. (the "Fund").

 WHEREAS, the Investment Adviser has entered into an
Investment Advisory Agreement, dated July 15, 1982, with the Fund
whereby the Investment Adviser provides certain management and
investment advisory services to the Fund;

 WHEREAS, the
Investment Adviser has entered into a Fee Waiver Agreement dated
October 10, 2001 wherein the Investment Adviser agrees to waive
0.15% of its 1.00% investment advisory fee;

 WHEREAS, the Investment Adviser has entered into a Fee Waiver
Agreement dated June 1, 2004 wherein the Investment Adviser agreed to
increase the fee waiver to 0.25% of its 1.00% investment
advisory fee;

WHEREAS, the Investment Adviser desires to revise
the term of the Fee Waiver Agreement so that renewal of the fee waiver
is considered in conjunction with consideration of renewal of the
Fund's Investment Advisory Agreement;

 WHEREAS, the
Investment Adviser understands and intends that the Fund will rely on
this Agreement in preparing a registration statement on Form N-1A and
in accruing the expenses of the Fund for purposes of calculating net
asset value and for other purposes, and expressly permits the Fund to
do so; and

 WHEREAS, the shareholders of the Fund will
benefit from the ongoing waivers by incurring lower Fund operating
expenses than they would absent such waivers.

 NOW,
THEREFORE, the Investment Adviser agrees to waive 0.25% of its
1.00% investment advisory fee, thereby reducing the investment
advisory fee to 0.75% of the Fund's average daily net
assets for the period of this Agreement.

 This contractual
fee waiver shall be effective through March 31, 2006 and for annual
periods thereafter unless the Investment Adviser shall notify the Fund
of the termination of the contractual fee waiver not less than 30 days
prior to the end of the then annual period.

 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Investment Adviser and the Fund have agreed to this Fee
Waiver Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


		FUND ASSET MANAGEMENT, L.P.





		By: /s/ Donald C.
Burke                

 Name: Donald C. Burke

Title: First Vice President and Treasurer





		MERRILL LYNCH FOCUS VALUE FUND, INC.





		By: /s/Robert C. Doll,
Jr.                

 Name: Robert C. Doll, Jr.

Title: President
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00004-CV

REGINA KAY SMITH AND JEFFREY SCOTT GROVE,

AS SURVIVING PARENTS OF BRITTANY DAWN GROVE

v.

USI INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.

On Appeal from the

206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C-3969-17-D-1

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellants.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 18, 2021
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
 
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
report dated March 20, 1998, included or made a part of this Registration
Statement of Remington Oil and Gas Corporation (formerly Box Energy
Corporation), on Form S-4, and to all references to our firm included in this
document.
 
                                            ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Dallas, Texas
August 14, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE
     30, 1998 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               676
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         400
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1,076
<PP&E>                                            35,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                    10,802
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    28,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            334,785
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                       5,276,289
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,583,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     (28,008)
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  89,714
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 3,229
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (92,943)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (92,943)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (92,943)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .011
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .011
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Amendment to the Quarterly Report of Magnitude Information
      Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
      2008
      (the "Form 10-Q"), I, Joerg H. Klaube, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
      of
      my **** knowledge,
      that the Company's Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Form 10-Q, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:
                May 21, 2008
            /s/
                Joerg H. KlaubeJoerg
                H. Klaube, Chief Financial Officer
MD5(NSRLvectors.zip)= 5dcae67bf8113dfb8ae1c85f5653f7f9
SHA1(NSRLvectors.zip)= dfee7b663078d1c4fd75aac0e87e49d2bab6d072
SHA256(NSRLvectors.zip)= 621a0149dfe7b83f9a81ddc315aaf147aa75fa892bfe4b26e0841133f98480cf
MD5(NSRL_Knoppix.iso)= b41d0dc679101962401bd9520a03e0cd
SHA1(NSRL_Knoppix.iso)= 78850740d8c335c487f1bcad885e43f2deb00de4
SHA256(NSRL_Knoppix.iso)= 8b4962031977d08c4f2acc7a0c2d844f52af491549d0e7a142e626edad6b2a36
MD5(WIRED-060511.iso)= 692c037e70b786e61200e053262186ab
SHA1(WIRED-060511.iso)= 884b8b8d80f9372f33a7efd4df8492eeb7f5fc2b
SHA256(WIRED-060511.iso)= bb9a011505ce776539c37ca51c49c5e002d075906f927693cd506e9e072e29e5
MD5(NSRLperl.tar.gz)= a43b3593f94e3276c1eacec2032ee53c
SHA1(NSRLperl.tar.gz)= 2d4a7647449c37f5c04c22b72f57f2b34473bfdd
SHA256(NSRLperl.tar.gz)= 65bf4e95ea9a62bdfd093635d81fc78ac514082b089749b22b90e44d6d832859
11119.

#### Maynard *v.*Wight.

Ltjke, *J.*

A motion is made to dismiss the bill of exceptions in this ease, upon the ground that it was not served within the time required by the Civil Code (1910), § 6160. Inasmuch as the defendant in error, in his acknowledgement of service, preserved his right to dismiss upon the ground now urged, and the record showing (and by the record *816this court is bound) that service of the bill of exceptions was not had in the time required by law, the writ of error must be

Decided March 2, 1920.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Pendleton. September 22, 1919.

*Albert Kemper, Thomas E. Scolb,*for plaintiff in error.

*E. M. Habersham, W. I. Heyward,*contra.

*Dismissed.*

*Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworlh, J., concur.*