alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 451 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 451

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the at-risk rules 
                 for publicly traded nonrecourse debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2003

  Mr. Foley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the at-risk rules 
                 for publicly traded nonrecourse debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT UNDER AT-RISK RULES OF PUBLICLY TRADED NONRECOURSE 
              DEBT.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 465(b)(6) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to qualified nonrecourse 
financing treated as amount at risk) is amended by striking ``share 
of'' and all that follows and inserting ``share of--
                            ``(i) any qualified nonrecourse financing 
                        which is secured by real property used in such 
                        activity, and
                            ``(ii) any other financing which--
                                    ``(I) would (but for subparagraph 
                                (B)(ii)) be qualified nonrecourse 
                                financing,
                                    ``(II) is qualified publicly traded 
                                debt, and
                                    ``(III) is not borrowed by the 
                                taxpayer from a person described in 
                                subclause (I), (II), or (III) of 
                                section 49(a)(1)(D)(iv).''.
    (b) Qualified Publicly Traded Debt.--Paragraph (6) of section 
465(b) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(F) Qualified publicly traded debt.--For purposes 
                of subparagraph (A), the term `qualified publicly 
                traded debt' means any debt instrument which is readily 
                tradable on an established securities market. Such term 
                shall not include any debt instrument which has a yield 
                to maturity which equals or exceeds the limitation in 
                section 163(i)(1)(B).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to debt instruments issued after December 31, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
#### Henry E. Sullivan, Appellant, *v.*William Williams, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

June, 1919.)

Carriers — liability of public truckman for loss of goods — appeal.

A public truckman is an insurer against all losses of goods committed to his care, except those arising from the acts of God, or the public enemy, or public authority, or the shipper, or losses caused by the inherent nature of the goods.

Where during a brief absence of the driver of defendant, a public truckman, his truck, which he had left unguarded, together with its contents, including goods of plaintiff which were being taken to a railroad freight depot, disappeared from in front of the station, the defendant is liable, and a judgment in his favor based upon a finding that the loss of plaintiff’s goods was occasioned by some misfortune or accident not within the control of the defendant will be reversed and judgment directed for plaintiff.

Appeal by plaintiff front a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York dismissing the complaint upon the merits, after trial by the court without a jury.

Levy & Becker (Joseph Levy, of counsel), for appellant.

Schlesinger & Lazaroe (M. A. Schlesinger, of counsel), for respondent.

Mullan, J.

The driver of defendant, a public truck-man, carried goods of the plaintiff to a railroad freight depot, left his truck on a line of waiting trucks, and went into the station, where he remained four or five minutes. While away from his truck during that period, the truck, with its contents, including the plain*512tiff’s goods, disappeared, presumably by reason of theft. The defense is that there was no proof of negligence. The contract under which defendant did plaintiff’s trucking generally, and which covered this particular trucking job, provided that “in the care and disposal of the goods of the company (the plaintiff) the responsibility of the contractor (the defendant) and his servants and agents shall be that of a carrier and bailee for hire.” The learned trial justice found that the defendant was a common carrier, but he also found that the loss *‘ ‘*was occasioned by some misfortune or accident not within the control of the defendant,” and upon this he based his conclusion that the defendant was not liable. We adopt the common carrier finding, but we are unable to adopt the other finding referred to or the conclusion it compelled. The defendant, as a common carrier, was an insurer against all losses except those arising from the acts of God, or the public enemy, or public authority, or the shipper, or losses caused by the inherent nature of the goods. None of these exceptions is present here. Even if the common carrier rule did not apply here, and the defendant were a mere bailee for hire, his failure to guard the truck and its contents would have been sufficient to fasten liability upon him.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff, with costs.

Guy and Bijur, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, with costs,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       368,506,000
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                  94,791,000
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             498,829,000
<CASH>                                      40,809,000
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                          26,433,000
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      55,590,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             760,463,000
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            120,134,000
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                        240,340,000
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                       34,476,000
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             92,309,000
<COMMON>                                       911,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 196,115,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               760,463,000
<PREMIUMS>                                 311,159,000
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         21,332,000
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           4,170,000
<OTHER-INCOME>                              38,769,000
<BENEFITS>                                 171,163,000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                 81,180,000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        49,118,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             34,703,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                10,336,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         24,367,000
<DISCONTINUED>                             (6,817,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                17,550,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.67
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              88,992,000
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                        163,038,000
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                            5,230,000
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                         113,841,000
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            37,307,000
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                            108,334,000
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                    (7,182,000)


</TABLE>
exv10w7



 






Exhibit 10.7




FIRST AMENDMENT

TO THE

NISOURCE INC. EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE POLICY




          WHEREAS, NiSource Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the NiSource Inc. Executive Severance Policy
as amended and restated effective January 1, 2005 (the “Policy”); and




          WHEREAS, The Company has reserved the right to amend the Policy and now deems it appropriate
to do so.




          NOW, THEREFORE, the Policy is hereby amended to extend its term to January 31, 2006.




          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed on its behalf,
by its officer duly authorized, this 2nd day of December, 2005.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	NISOURCE INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Michael W. O’Donnell	 
	 	 	Michael W. O’Donnell
Exhibit 23


               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 No. 33-86882 pertaining to the Michigan Financial Corporation Employee
Savings and Stock Ownership Plan and No. 033-59425 pertaining to the Michigan
Financial Corporation Stock Option Plan of our report dated January 19, 1996,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Michigan Financial
Corporation, member banks and insurance subsidiary incorporated by reference in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1995.


                                                               Ernst & Young LLP


Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 22, 1996
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10(i)4
                                                           ALLETE 2006 Form 10-K

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                         ALLETE AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES
                     SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

         The ALLETE and Affiliate Companies Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan, amended and restated effective January 1, 2004, is amended as follows:

         1. Effective January 1, 2007, Section 4.10 is DELETED in its entirety
         and replaced with the following:

         4.10   FORM OF PAYMENT - RETIREMENT BENEFITS

         The normal, or default, form of the Retirement Benefits provided for in
         Section 4.6 will be a 15-year monthly annuity (calculated using an 8%
         interest rate or other rate as approved by the Committee). The
         Participant may elect to receive the Retirement Benefits in the
         optional form of a monthly life annuity (calculated using the factor
         described in Section 4.6), such amount to be adjusted (i.e.,
         cost-of-living adjustments) in the same manner as provided in Section
         5.11 of Retirement Plan A; provided, however, that any Participant who
         is also eligible for retirement benefits under the ALLETE and
         Affiliated Companies Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan II (SERP
         II) must receive Retirement Benefits under this Plan in the same form
         as he or she receives retirement benefits under SERP II. For purposes
         of clarification, if a Participant who is eligible for retirement
         benefits under SERP II receives the normal form of retirement benefits
         under SERP II, for any reason, any election by the Participant to
         receive the optional form of Retirement Benefits under this Plan shall
         be inoperable and the Participant shall receive the normal form of
         Retirement Benefits under this Plan.

         If the actuarial present value of the Retirement Benefits under Section
         4.6 is less than $10,000, the benefit will be paid in a lump sum
         payment.

                                       1

<PAGE>

         If a Participant has commenced receipt of Retirement Benefits under
         this Plan and is re-employed by the Company, Retirement Benefit
         payments under this Plan shall be suspended upon such re-employment
         until the Participant again becomes eligible to receive Retirement
         Benefit payments under the Plan.

                                   ALLETE, INC.


                               By: /s/ Donald J. Shippar
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Donald J. Shippar
                                   Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer

ATTEST:


By: /s/ Deborah A. Amberg
    --------------------------------------------------
    Deborah A. Amberg
    Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary

                                       2
<TABLE> <S> <C>
    
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                          2,696
<SECURITIES>                   21,062
<RECEIVABLES>                 147,759
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                    80,386
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                5,260
<PP&E>                        373,940
<DEPRECIATION>                182,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                530,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         173,164
<BONDS>                             0
<COMMON>                       56,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                    169,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  530,945 
<SALES>                       594,466
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              594,466
<CGS>                         243,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 243,849
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              231,541
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             10,623
<INCOME-PRETAX>               110,135
<INCOME-TAX>                   24,781
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            85,354
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                   85,354
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    1.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0
        

</TABLE>
Order issued July 29, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

________________________________________
No. 05-14-01496-CR

________________________________________ ZACHERY LEATCH, Appellant



### V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee



### O R D E R

Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the March 6, 2015 motion of
Kathleen A. Walsh for leave to withdraw as appointed counsel on appeal. We DIRECT the

Clerk of the Court to remove Kathleen A. Wa lsh as counsel of record for appellant. We

DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order and all future correspondence to
Zachery Leatch, TDCJ No. 1971633, Gurney Unit, 1385 FM 3328, Tennessee Colony, Texas,

75803.

/Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<CIK>                                0000839441
<NAME>                               CAPITAL GROWTH, INC.

<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-00
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-00
<CASH>                               8,314
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                         0
<INVENTORY>                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     8,314
<PP&E>                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       8,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                3,278
<BONDS>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                             26,500
<OTHER-SE>                          (21,464)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         8,314
<SALES>                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     0
<CGS>                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     5,347
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (5,347)
<INCOME-TAX>                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (5,347)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                         (5,347)
<EPS-BASIC>                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .00


</TABLE>
#### J. W. Satterlane et al. *v.*Anson W. Evans et al.

Wills — Right of Survivorship Between Devisees.

Under a provision in a will “that if any of my children shall die without children the land, etc., shall be divided among my remaining children and heirs,” on the death of one of the testator’s children without issue, her interest in the land passes to the surviving children, there being no other heirs.

March 6, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

There is but one question made in this case, and that arises upon the construction of the will of William Evans.

The provision is, “that if any of his children shall die without children, the land, etc., shall be divided among my remaining children and heirs.”

*559
      *J. B. Earn, for appellants.*

*C.*Riley, *for appellees.*

The only heirs he left at his death were his children, and one of them., Virginia Evans, dying after the testator, without leaving issue, her interest in the land passed absolutely to the surviving children.

Judgment affirmed.
NIST PSCR RESEARCH INVESTMENTS BOLSTER 

OREGON’S ECONOMY 

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Public Safety OREGON BY THE NUMBERS 

Communications Research (PSCR) Division is the primary federal laboratory 

focused on conducting research, development, testing, and evaluation for NIST INVESTMENT 

public safety communications technologies. Their mission is to accelerate $3.1 Million communications innovation in support of public safety communities and the 

citizens they serve. 

The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 allocated $300 Million 

from the Public Safety Trust fund to NIST PSCR to perform critical public safety 

communications R&D during a 10-year period. PSCR implemented numerous 

research mechanisms to support the development and deployment of the 

Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network: grants, Small Business Innovation 

Research (SBIR) contracts, prize challenge competitions, and internal research. 

These research mechanisms were housed within six research portfolios and crosscutting initiatives to maximize their impact: 

•	 User Interface/User Experience •	 Public Safety Analytics 

•	 Location-Based Services •	 Security 

•	 Mission Critical Voice •	 Resilient Systems 

While the ultimate impact of these research mechanisms is the increased safety 

of first responders and their communities through improved communications

technologies, PSCR was interested in better understanding how their R&D 

investments to date result in economic impacts that ripple outward to state 

economies. An independent analysis was conducted to demonstrate how PSCR’s 

deployment of the $300 Million from the Public Safety Trust Fund translated into 

broader impacts to the United States, including jobs, earnings, value added, and 

total economic output. PSCR’s R&D investments resulted in economic output 

in 33 of the 50 states. Results of the analysis are presented here. 

For more information, see NIST PSCR’s Economic Impact Study. 

2 Grant Awards 

Totaling $3.1 Million 

Western Fire Chiefs 

Association, Inc. 

For additional information of PSCR’s research programs, visit 

OUTPUT 

$5.9 Million 

VALUE-ADDED 

$9.0 Million 

EARNINGS 

$4.6 Million 

JOBS 

71 

Output: the total value of economic 

activity circulating through the U.S. 

economy generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Value-Added: how much the 

combined U.S. state economies 

grew over a period of time due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments 

Earnings: the change in household 

earnings in the U.S. economy 

generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Jobs: the change in the number of 

full- and part-time jobs generated 

by each one million dollar change 

in U.S. economic activity due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments 

*All dollar amounts presented 

in 2022 and reflect data as of 

October 2022.

**All values are rounded; thus, the 

sum of the components may not 

sum exactly to the NIST Investment 

. 

amount.

https://www.nist.gov/ctl/pscr
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00497

- CR

EDUARDO TREVINO

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 144th District Court of Bexar County , Texas Trial Cause No. 99

- CR

- 4085

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause o n appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal
DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. November 21, 2019
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the accompanyingAnnual Report of ALLTELCorporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2004as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), I, Scott T. Ford, Chief Executive Officer and President of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Scott T. Ford                     |   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Scott T. Ford                         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |   |
| June 21, 2005                         |   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to ALLTEL Corporation and will be retained by ALLTEL Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----