alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Gregory F. Kowal, Chief Executive Officer of Mera Pharmaceuticals, certify that (1) Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 3 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.




Date:   March 16, 2010/s/Gregory F. KowalGregory F. KowalChief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
National Research Council (NRC) Postdoctoral Fellowship at the 

National of Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Boulder

 2-year federal employee 

appointment; 

 ~$75k/year salary, full 

benefits, travel stipend;

 Application proposals due 

February 1 or August 1;

 Eligibility: US citizens within 

5 years of obtaining a Ph.D.

 NMR spectroscopy of 

gases, complex mixtures, 

solid state, 

 Measuring aerosol 

particles in exhaled 

breath and,

 Designing breath devices 

for in-silico 

characterization of 

exhaled breath

Apply online at the NRC website

RO #: 50.64.72.C0787

Multiscale interdisciplinary finite element 

(FE), computational fluid dynamics (CFD), 

and computational fluid particle 

dynamics (CFPD) methods.

Veruska Malavé: 

veruska.malave@nist.gov 1

Other program opportunities:

SURF: www.nist.gov/surf

PREP: www.nist.gov/iaao/academic-affairs-office/nist-professional-research-experience-program-prep
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1



                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


                         Airwaves, Inc.
                         Indiana Broadcasting, LLC
                         KXAN, Inc.
                         KXTX Holdings, Inc.
                         Linbenco, Inc.
                         LIN Sports, Inc.
                         LIN Television of Texas, Inc.
                         LIN Television of Texas, L.P.
                         LWWI Broadcasting Inc.
                         North Texas Broadcasting Corporation
                         WAND Television, Inc.
                         WAVY Broadcasting, LLC
                         WIVB Broadcasting, LLC
                         WOOD License Co., LLC
                         WOOD Television, Inc.
                         WTNH Broadcasting, Inc.
HMM Reference NIST Technical Note 2205: Item 8.1 Gutter Mesh Covering

Damaged vinyl gutter cover

Metal gutter cover

Damaged vinyl gutter cover

Item 8.1 Gutter Mesh Covering – Noncombustible gutter covers help prevent combustible debris and embers from entering gutter.

Metal gutter cover

Damaged vinyl gutter cover

Note: Selected photographs are included to illustrate each HMM hardening item. Additional vulnerabilities or hardening items may be seen in the photographs, but those are highlighted within their specific HMM item.
There is no CAD drawing for 

Item 8.1: Gutter Mesh Covering 

Please see photographs for illustrations.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27837]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Board of Scientific Counselors, Office of Public Health 
Preparedness and Response: Notice of Charter Amendment

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Board of Scientific Counselors, 
Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services 
(HHS), has amended their charter to add the Tribal Epidemiology Centers 
as a non-voting liaison representative. The amended filing date is 
November 5, 2014.
    For information, contact Samuel Groseclose, DVM, MPH, Board of 
Scientific Counselors, Office of Public Health and Preparedness and 
Response, Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, 1600 Clifton 
Road NE., Mailstop D44, Atlanta, Georgia, 30333, telephone (404) 639-
0637, or fax (404) 639-7977.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2014-27837 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```
<PAGE>   1
MICRODYNE CORPORATION                            1997 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

Board of Directors
Microdyne Corporation

We have issued our reports dated October 31, 1997, accompanying the financial
statements of Microdyne Corporation appearing in the Annual Report of the
Company to its shareholders and accompanying schedules included in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 28, 1997, which we are
incorporating by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of the
Company on Forms S-8 (File No 333-44820 effective December 27, 1991; File No.
333-47709, effective May 6, 1992; File No 333-89982 effective March 3, 1995;
File No 333-89980, effective April 26, 1995; and File No 333-14121, effective
October 15, 1996.) We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement of the aforementioned reports and to the use of our name
as it appears under the caption "Experts."

/s/ Grant Thornton
Vienna, Virginia
December 18, 1997
<PAGE>   1
                           [KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP]

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
Wireless International, Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report included herein and to the reference to our
firm under the heading "Experts" in the registration statement.


                                             KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Dallas, Texas
April 20, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                        14
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                14
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         392,048
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      7,994
<OTHER-SE>                    (400,028)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  14
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              0
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              31,261
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (31,261)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (31,261)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (31,261)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.04)
        


</TABLE>
No. 87-6328.

#### Scott *v.*Garraghty, Warden, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NIST PSCR RESEARCH INVESTMENTS BOLSTER 

NEW YORK’S ECONOMY 

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Public Safety 

Communications Research (PSCR) Division is the primary federal laboratory 

focused on conducting research, development, testing, and evaluation for 

public safety communications technologies. Their mission is to accelerate 

communications innovation in support of public safety communities and the 

citizens they serve. 

The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 allocated $300 Million 

from the Public Safety Trust fund to NIST PSCR to perform critical public safety 

communications R&D during a 10-year period. PSCR implemented numerous 

research mechanisms to support the development and deployment of the 

Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network: grants, Small Business Innovation 

Research (SBIR) contracts, prize challenge competitions, and internal research. 

These research mechanisms were housed within six research portfolios and crosscutting initiatives to maximize their impact: 

•	 User Interface/User Experience •	 Public Safety Analytics 

•	 Location-Based Services •	 Security 

•	 Mission Critical Voice •	 Resilient Systems 

While the ultimate impact of these research mechanisms is the increased safety 

of first responders and their communities through improved communications

technologies, PSCR was interested in better understanding how their R&D 

investments to date result in economic impacts that ripple outward to state 

economies. An independent analysis was conducted to demonstrate how PSCR’s 

deployment of the $300 Million from the Public Safety Trust Fund translated into 

broader impacts to the United States, including jobs, earnings, value added, and 

total economic output. PSCR’s R&D investments resulted in economic output 

in 33 of the 50 states. Results of the analysis are presented here. 

For more information, see NIST PSCR’s Economic Impact Study. 

NEW YORK BY THE NUMBERS 

NIST INVESTMENT 

$7.4 Million 

OUTPUT 

$14.6 Million 

VALUE-ADDED 

$17.8 Million 

EARNINGS 

$9.6 Million 

JOBS 

118 

Output: the total value of economic 

activity circulating through the U.S. 

economy generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Value-Added: how much the 

combined U.S. state economies 

6 Prize Challenge 

Participants 

Awards Totaling 

$0.1 Million 

3 Grant Awards 

Totaling $7.3 Million 

•	 New York University 

•	 Cornell University 

•	 The Trustees of Columbia University 

in the City of New York 

For additional information of PSCR’s research programs, visit https://www.nist.gov/ctl/pscr. 

grew over a period of time due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments 

Earnings: the change in household 

earnings in the U.S. economy 

generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Jobs: the change in the number of 

full- and part-time jobs generated 

by each one million dollar change 

in U.S. economic activity due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments 

*All dollar amounts presented 

in 2022 and reflect data as of 

October 2022.

**All values are rounded; thus, the 

sum of the components may not 

sum exactly to the NIST Investment 

amount.
N a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e o f S t a n d a r d s a n d T e c h n o l o g y T e c h n o l o g y A d m i n i s t r a t i o n , U

. S

. D e p a r t m e n t o f C o m m e r c e E D I T O R S : G e o r g e O h r i n g , N O A A / N E S D I S
B r u c e W i e l i c k i
, N A S A L a n g le y R e s e a r ch C e n t e r R o y S p e n c e r , N A S A M a r s h a l l S p a c e F l i g h t C e n t e r B i l l E m e r y , U n i v e r s i t y o f C o l o r a d o R a j u D a t l a , N I S T

P h y s i c s L a b o r a t o r y O p t i c a l T e c h n o l o g y D i v i s i o n N a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e o f S t a n d a r d s a n d T e c h n o l o g y 1 0 0 B u r e a u D r i v e S t o p 8 4 4 1 G a i t h e r s b u r g , M D 2 0 8 9 9

- 8 4 4 1

U

. S

. D e p a r t m e n t o f C o m m e r c e D o n a l d L

. E v a n s , S e c r e t a r y

T

e c h n o l o g y A d m i n i s t r a t i o n P

h i

l l i p J

. B o n d
, U n d e r S e c r e t a r y f o r T e c h n o l o g y

N a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e o f S t a n d a r d s a n d T e c h n o l o g y A rd e n L

. B e m e n t , J r
. , D i r e c t o r

N I S T I R 7 0 4 7
M a r c h 2 0 0 4

D i s c l a i

m e r : a n y m e n t i o n o f c o m m e r c i a l p r o d u c t s i s f o r i n f o r m a t i o n o n l y

, i t d o e s n o t i m p l y

r e c o m m e n d a t i o n o r e n d o r s e m e n t
, n o r d o e s i t i m p l y
t h a t t h e p r o d u c t s m e n t i o n e d a r e n e c e s s a r i l

y t h e b e s t

a v a i l a b l e f o r t h e p u r p o s e

.
#### Jacob Hall *v.*J. W. Lansdown.

Vendor and Purchaser — Pleading—Vendor’s Lien.

One who seeks to enforce a vendor’s lien, reserved hy express contract, must set out the contract in his petition; and the filing of a note which contains a stipulation that a vendor’s lien is retained, does not dispense with the allegation in the petition to enforce the lien, that the lien was so reserved.

APPEAL PROM ROWAN CIRCUIT COURT.

January 30, 1874.

*480
      *Nesbitt, for appellant.*

*. T. F. Hargis, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

This court has held, and we think very properly, that an express stipulation in a contract for the sale of land, that the vendor retains a lien for the purchase money as between the parties, will be enforced in a court of equity, where the rights of strangers are not to be affected thereby, although the requisitions of Sec. 26, Chap. 80, Rev. Stat., may not have been complied with. But the party seeking to enforce a lien reserved by express contract, must set out the contract in his petition in direct terms.

' In appellee’s petition that is not done; the note is filed which contains a stipulation to the effect that a lien is retained; but that does not dispense with the allegation. The. note is but evidence, and evidence without allegation will not authorize a judgment. Ap-pellee asks in his prayer for an enforcement of his lien; but he prays for more than he has shown himself entitled to as receiver, and the court could not grant the relief under the state of pleadings.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause is. remanded with directions to set aside the sale and conveyance, and for further proceedings consistent herewith. ■ The deed is copied in this record, but the clerk states that it was not filed until after the judgment was rendered, and it should not have been copied. On the return of the cause appellee should be permitted to amend his petition, and it might be well to give a more specific description of the land.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. May 20, 2004 United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40951 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaint iffAppellee,

versus

TERESA ANN BRACK,

DefendantAppellant.

--------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:02-CR-20-1

----------------------------------------------------------

Before SMITH, DeMOSS AND STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Teresa Ann Brack in this direct criminal appeal has moved

fo r leave t o withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with A nders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Brack respo nded to counsel’s motion, arguing that the Government breached the plea

agreement by failing to move for a downward departure at sentencing in order that she would receivea 40-month sentence, as she was promised. She also maintains that she has a valid ineffective

assistance of counsel claim. Accordingly, Brack requests the appointment of substitute appellat e

counsel.

This court generally does not review ineffective-assistan c e-of-counsel claims on direct appeal;

this case presents no exception. S ee United States v. Valuck

, 286 F.3d 221, 229 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied , 537 U.S. 1000 (2002). Brack’s motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.

Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Brack’s response shows that there

are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.
05-ft -0t2$Cf -£&

tfa/&6

^^4^^^/^^^

AtkP- j^l iS**->

X" tiadJ- hkf-.UpuTtL^e rh~

'£^L-

"^k^t^'_&£&* fk^

r
- ...... ,*^^-, ..: ..>.ja-..;.m>t.,, .W. i-

.- .. •.^^^it^g^^

\C4 &/t

Yimm***^*^-

c-

^-

H
7^ fldtft ^ttfTF/T 

31 J%JG .2.01S PM ;

i.llii.i.i^ii.ii.lnjij.ijlpi,,,,,),,!,
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 71810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28532]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, 
December 4, 2014 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session, and determined that no 
earlier notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution settlement of administrative proceedings;
Settlement of injunctive actions;
Litigation matter; and
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: December 1, 2014.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-28532 Filed 12-1-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
EXHIBIT 23.2

NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it becomes effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among others, an accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part of the registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connection with the registration statement.

On April 25, 2002, the Board of Directors of Mississippi Chemical Corporation (the "Company"), upon recommendation of its Audit Committee, decided to no longer engage Arthur Andersen LLP ("Arthur Andersen") as the Company's independent public accountants, effective immediately.  For additional information, see the Company's Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on May 1, 2002, and May 15, 2002.

After reasonable efforts, the Company has been unable to obtain Arthur Andersen's written consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company's registration statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-36998 and 333-56726 and Form S-3 No. 333-38619) (the "Registration Statements") of Arthur Andersen's audit report with respect to the Company's consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2001, and for the two years in the period then ended.  Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act permits the Company to file this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference into the Registration Statements, without a written consent from Arthur Andersen.  As a result, with respect to transactions in the Company's securities pursuant to the Registration Statements that occur subsequent to the date this Annual Report on Form 10-K is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Arthur Andersen will not have any liability under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in the financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein.  Accordingly, an acquiror of the Company's securities would be unable to assert a claim against Arthur Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50519

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GABRIEL DOMINGUEZ-CASTRO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:05-CR-2507-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Gabriel

Dominguez-Castro raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.