alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4594 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to double the maximum 

new market tax credits, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2004 

Mr. JEFFERSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to double 

the maximum new market tax credits, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘New Markets Tax 

5 Credit Enhancement Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DOUBLING OF NEW MARKETS TAX CREDIT. 

7 Paragraph (1) of section 45D(f) of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986 (relating to national limitation on 

9 amount of investments designated) is amended by striking 
2 

•HR 4594 IH 

1 subparagraphs (C) and (D) and inserting the following 

2 new subparagraphs: 

3 ‘‘(C) $2,000,000,000 for 2004, 

4 ‘‘(D) $4,000,000,000 for 2005, 

5 ‘‘(E) $7,000,000,000 for 2006, and 

6 ‘‘(F) $7,000,000,000 for 2007.’’ 

7 SEC. 3. AUTHORITY TO TARGET LOW-INCOME POPU8 LATIONS. 

9 Subsection (e) of section 45D of the Internal Revenue 

10 Code of 1986 (defining low-income community) is amend11 ed by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(4) TARGETED POPULATION.—The Secretary 

13 shall prescribe regulations under which 1 or more 

14 targeted populations (within the meaning of section 

15 3(20) of the Riegle Community Development and 

16 Regulatory Improvement Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 

17 4702(20))) may be treated as low-income commu18 nities without regard to paragraph (2). Such regula19 tions shall include procedures for determining which 

20 entities are qualified active low-income community 

21 businesses with respect to such populations.’’ 

Æ
#### John A. Mullins *v.*Thos. Joyce’s Adm’r.

Fraudulent Conveyances — Conveyance to Defeat Creditors.

The sale by a debtor of all his property subject to execution, just prior to being sued by a creditor, was held to be a sham device to defeat the' grantor’s creditors.

Fraudulent Conveyances — Prima Facie Case of Fraud.

Where it is shown that a debtor, just prior to being sued by a creditor, conveyed all his property which was subject to execution, but retained possession and control of the premises, it mates out a prima facie case of fraudulent combination.

APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

March 17, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

Thompson conveyed his house and lot just before he was. sued on the debts due to Joyce’s estate. He retained possession, and con*584tinued to use and control the premises in the same manner that he did before the pretended sale. The conveyance recites that the full amount of the purchase price was paid in hand.

Joyce, *for appellant.*

*M. A.*Sachs, *for appellee.*

The allegations of the petition are to the effect that the sale was a mere sham; that the conveyance was executed and accepted to enable Thompson to cheat, hinder and delay his creditors; and that in point of fact nothing was paid by Mullins to Thompson. Mullins contents himself with denying the charge of fraud, insisting that his purchase was bona fide, and by alleging that the consideration named in the deed was actually paid, part of it in a debt due him from Thompson, and the balance in cash. The testimony, though not of the most convincing character, tends to show that Mullins was not able to have made a cash payment of any considerable amount, and this fact, coupled with the circumstances stated, viz., that Mullins purchased all of Thompson’s property subject to execution just before he was sued by Joyce’s, administrator, and that Thompson retained possession and control of the premises, is sufficient to make out a prima facie case of fraudulent combination. The explanation of the continued occupation of the house by Thompson strengthens the presumption of fraud. The receipts for rent alleged to have been paid by Mrs. Thompson, all bear date on the 14th day of the respective months in which they purport to have been given. They are all written on the- same kind of paper, with the same colored ink, and evidently with the same pen. The conclusion is almost inevitable that they were all prepared at the same time, and that they were gotten up for the purpose of being used in this suit.

There is no evidence that Mullins held a note or other claims on Thompson, nor that he at any time paid him one cent of money. The court is not even favored with a statement as. to the amount of the debt and of the cash payment. We are satisfied that the entire transaction was a sham. Judgment affirmed.
NIST PSCR RESEARCH INVESTMENTS BOLSTER 

MISSOURI’S ECONOMY 

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Public Safety MISSOURI BY THE NUMBERS 

Communications Research (PSCR) Division is the primary federal laboratory 

focused on conducting research, development, testing, and evaluation for NIST INVESTMENT 

public safety communications technologies. Their mission is to accelerate $0.02 Million communications innovation in support of public safety communities and the 

citizens they serve. 

The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 allocated $300 Million 

from the Public Safety Trust fund to NIST PSCR to perform critical public safety 

communications R&D during a 10-year period. PSCR implemented numerous 

research mechanisms to support the development and deployment of the 

Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network: grants, Small Business Innovation 

Research (SBIR) contracts, prize challenge competitions, and internal research. 

These research mechanisms were housed within six research portfolios and crosscutting initiatives to maximize their impact: 

•	 User Interface/User Experience •	 Public Safety Analytics

•	 Location-Based Services •	 Security

•	 Mission Critical Voice •	 Resilient Systems 

While the ultimate impact of these research mechanisms is the increased safety 

of first responders and their communities through improved communications

technologies, PSCR was interested in better understanding how their R&D 

investments to date result in economic impacts that ripple outward to state 

economies. An independent analysis was conducted to demonstrate how PSCR’s 

deployment of the $300 Million from the Public Safety Trust Fund translated into 

broader impacts to the United States, including jobs, earnings, value added, and 

total economic output. PSCR’s R&D investments resulted in economic output 

in 33 of the 50 states. Results of the analysis are presented here. 

For more information, see NIST PSCR’s Economic Impact Study. 

For additional information of PSCR’s research programs, visit https://www.nist.gov/ctl/pscr. 

1 Prize Challenge 

Participant 

Awards Totaling 

$0.02 Million 

OUTPUT 

$0.05 Million 

VALUE-ADDED 

$0.03 Million 

EARNINGS 

$0.02 Million 

JOBS 

0 

Output: the total value of economic 

activity circulating through the U.S. 

economy generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Value-Added: how much the 

combined U.S. state economies 

grew over a period of time due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments 

Earnings: the change in household 

earnings in the U.S. economy 

generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Jobs: the change in the number of 

full- and part-time jobs generated 

by each one million dollar change 

in U.S. economic activity due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments 

*All dollar amounts presented 

in 2022 and reflect data as of 

October 2022.

**All values are rounded; thus, the 

sum of the components may not 

sum exactly to the NIST Investment 

amount.
#### Jas. G. Bell et al. *v.*James Redman.

Dower — Conveyance in Lieu of Dower.

Where property was conveyed to a wife in lieu of dower in other property, the court will not disturb her right to the property which accrued prior to the debt sought to be enforced against the husband and to subject the property.

APPEAL PROM LARUE CIRCUIT COURT.

October 18, 1873.

*H. S. Johnson, Chelf, for appellants.*

*Read & Twyman, Murray, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The- evidence in the case shows a refusal on the part of Mrs. Redmen to relinquish her dower in the house and lot sold by her husband to Larue, unless the latter would secure -her in another house. The husband paid for the lot bought of Read with •his own means, and this liquidated claim of the wife never having been satisfied, a short time prior to the institution of appellants’ action on the note, which was in 1862, he had the title to the lot made to the wife. Pie paid only one hundred dollars for it, and the improvements did not cost him exceeding one hundred and fifty dollars. The equity of the wife existed before the debt to appellants was created; and having been satisfied by this conveyance of property, not exceeding in value the amount to which she was entitled, this court will not disturb her right to the property. It is not material, we think, to enquire how the lot from Read was paid for, except s’o far as it may affect the credibility of the son’s statements.. If this agreement or promise was made by the husband to the wife, as alleged, by which she was induced to part with her potential right of dower, the conveyance should be annulled. The facts in the case will not authorize a chancellor to disregard the son’s statement.

The chancellor acted properly in dismissing the petition absolutely, as her potential right of dower in the Larue house and lot was worth fully as much as the property conveyed to her.

Judgment *affirmed.*
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Fiscal Year 2020 Agency Report

1. Please provide a summary of your agency’s activities undertaken to carry out the provisions of 

OMB Circular A-119, “Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus 

Standards and in Conformity Assessment Activities” and the National Technology Transfer and 

Advance Act (NTTAA). The summary should contain a link to the agency’s standards-specific 

website(s) where information about your agency’s standards and conformity assessment related 

activities are available.

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”) is an independent agency of the United States 

Government charged with enforcing competition and consumer protection laws. The Commission’s 

primary contact with voluntary consensus standards and the organizations that produce them is in 

connection with the enforcement of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits unfair methods 

of competition and unfair or deceptive acts and practices in or affecting commerce. Consistent with its 

statutory authority, the Commission occasionally has promulgated consumer protection regulations that 

incorporate voluntary consensus standards. See, e.g., 16 C.F.R. § 306.5 (provision of FTC’s “Fuel Rating 

Rule”); 16 C.F.R. § 460.5 (provision of FTC’s “R-Value Rule”). FTC staff monitors complaints about 

products and may conduct investigations, including testing, to ensure accurate labeling or advertising. 

The Commission does not participate in the standards development activities of voluntary consensus 

standards bodies.

To carry out the provisions of OMB Circular A-119, the FTC has designated the Deputy General Counsel 

for Legal Counsel as its Agency Standards Executive. The FTC’s Office of the General Counsel, under the 

direction of the Agency Standards Executive, provides advice to FTC staff regarding implementation of 

revised OMB Circular A-119.

2. Please list the government-unique standards (GUS) your agency began using in lieu of voluntary 

consensus standards during FY 2020. Please note that GUS which are still in effect from previous years 

should continue to be listed, thus the total number in your agency's report will include all GUS 

currently in use (previous years and new as of this FY): 0
Order filed, April 01, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 01045

- CR

____________ EDWARD MONTEMAYER , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 228th District Court

Harris County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. 1351306



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due January 17, 2014

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On January 29, 2014 , this court ordered the court reporter to file the record within 30 days. Also, on January 29, 2014 , Arlene Webb attempted to file her portion of the record which was rejected because it was not signed and the

cover was not numbered properly. The corrected record has not been filed with th ecourt. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the

following order.

We order Arlene Webb , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. No further extension will be

en tertained absent exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Arlene Webb does not timely file the record as ordered, we
will is sue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the
reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Sean M. Cary, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Willamette Valley
Vineyards, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the
small business issuer and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2007
/s/ Sean M. Cary
    Sean M. Cary
    Controller
Response to the STRP Final Report

2022-S-0003

Standard Practice for the Identification of Compounds Related to Organic Gunshot Residue (OGSR) by

Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS)

Scientific and Technical Merit

1.1.This document is not designed to aid in the rendering an opinion on the presence or absence of

OGSR, just the identification of compounds that are related to OGSR.

Human Factors

2.1. Regarding Section 8.3.2.4. (background subtraction), this section has been removed because

background or baseline subtraction is not always necessary in LC-MS analysis.

2.2. Regarding 8.3.2. we have updated the language to respond to the questions posed by the STRP. The

language in Section 8.3.2 is clarified.

8.3.2.2. The measured m/z value of the ions shall be within the instrument manufacturer’s

tolerance (mass accuracy) of the theoretical value of the target compound.

8.3.2.2.1. When MRM techniques are used, the precursor and product ions shall be the same for

both the reference and unknown compounds.

8.3.2.2.2. When HRMS techniques are used, the exact mass shall be the same for both the

reference and unknown compounds within the instrument’s tolerance.

2.3. To respond to the comment about the differences in the relative abundance of fragmentation peaks

we provided similar language as what was written in the GC-MS document, see below.

8.3.2.3. The fragmentation patterns and relative abundances of target ions in the mass spectra of

the unknown sample and the reference OGSR sample must not have unexplainable differences

across the majority of the ions.

8.3.2.3.1. Analysts must document reasons for considering or not considering differences between

the spectra.

Quality Assurance

3.1. The committee agrees with the STRP panel

Scope and Purpose

4.1. The committee agrees with the STRP panel
Terminology

5.1. The committee agrees with the STRP panel

Method Description

6.1. The committee agrees with the STRP panel. The committee has updated the document to reflect the

Human Factors comments.

Report Results

7.1. The committee agrees with the STRP panel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF INCOME AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         115,893
<SECURITIES>                                    38,069
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,103
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,947
<INVENTORY>                                      2,895
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               185,195
<PP&E>                                         445,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                  70,440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 577,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,121
<BONDS>                                        315,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           106
<OTHER-SE>                                     118,476
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   577,237
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               313,830
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  189,122<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,086<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,507
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,248
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,231
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,017
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,017
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THIS AMOUNT IS THE SUM OF CASINO, ROOMS, FOOD AND BEVERAGE, AND OTHER OPERATING
EXPENSES UNDER COSTS AND EXPENSES IN THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR
THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, LESS THE PROVISION FOR DOUBTFUL
RECEIVABLES INCLUDED THEREIN.
<F2>THIS AMOUNT IS INCLUDED IN CASINO AND ROOMS UNDER COSTS AND EXPENSES IN THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT INCOME FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.3







 


 


 



	
            Exhibit 10.3
 



 






 


 



 


 



	
            Exhibit 10.3
 



 






 



 


 



	
            Exhibit 10.3
 



 






 



 


 



	
            Exhibit 10.3
 



 






 



 


 



	
            Exhibit 10.3
 



 






 



 


 



	
            Exhibit 10.3
 



 






 



 


 



 



	
            Exhibit 10.3
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28198]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Sunshine Act Meeting; Board of Governors; Meeting; Teleconference

DATES AND TIMES: Friday, December 5, 2014, at 2:30 p.m.

PLACE: Via Teleconference (Public access to hear the teleconference 
will be at 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW., in the Benjamin Franklin Room, or 
live via audio webcast at http://about.usps.com/news/electronic-press-kits/bog/welcome.htm.)

STATUS: Friday, December 5, at 2:30 p.m.--Open; Friday, December 5, at 
2:45 p.m.--Closed

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    Friday, December 5, at 2:30 p.m. (Open)
    1. Approval of Minutes of Previous Meetings.
    2. Approval of the FY2014 10K and Financial Statements.
    3. Approval of the Annual Report and Comprehensive Statement.
    Friday, December 5, at 2:45 p.m. (Closed)
    1. Strategic Issues.
    2. Pricing.
    3. Governors' Executive Session--Discussion of prior agenda items 
and Board Governance.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone: (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-28198 Filed 11-25-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 99 (B)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K Mercantile Bankshares
Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002, (the "Report")
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Terry L. Troupe, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Terry L. Troupe
----------------------
Terry L. Troupe
Chief Financial Officer


Date: March 26, 2003