alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4210 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4210

To amend the Farm Credit Act of 1971 to support the commercial fishing 
                               industry.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2004

Mr. LoBiondo (for himself and Mr. Allen) introduced the following bill; 
           which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Farm Credit Act of 1971 to support the commercial fishing 
                               industry.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CREDIT TO BUSINESSES PROVIDING SERVICES TO 
              PRODUCERS OR HARVESTERS OF AQUATIC PRODUCTS.

    (a) Farm Credit Banks.--
            (1) Eligibility for credit and financial services.--Section 
        1.9 of the Farm Credit Act of 1971 (12 U.S.C. 2017) is 
        amended--
                    (A) by striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (2);
                    (B) by striking the period at the end of paragraph 
                (3) and inserting ``; or''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) persons furnishing to producers or harvesters of 
        aquatic products services directly related to their operating 
        needs.''.
            (2) Purposes for extensions of credit.--Section 1.11(c)(1) 
        of such Act (12 U.S.C. 2019(c)(1)) is amended by inserting 
        ``and to persons furnishing services directly related to the 
        operating needs of producers or harvesters of aquatic 
        products'' after ``needs''.
    (b) Production Credit Associations.--Section 2.4(a) of such Act (12 
U.S.C. 2075(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (2);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (3) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(4) persons furnishing to producers or harvesters of aquatic 
products services directly related to their operating needs.''.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:   November 4, 2002                         /s/ Robert A. Bourne
        ------------------                       -----------------------------
                                                 Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                                 Title: President and Treasurer
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT TO SERVICE AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDMENT TO SERVICE AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”), made as of this 1st day of
December, 2005, by and between Cronos Containers Limited, a company incorporated in England
and whose registered office is at the Ice House, Dean Street, Marlow, Buckinghamshire SL7 3AB,
England (“Employer”), and Frank P. Vaughan (“Employee”),



W I T N E S S E T H:




     WHEREAS, Employer and Employee entered into a Service Agreement, dated as of April 20, 2000,
as amended December 17, 2001, November 5, 2002, December 15, 2003, and July 8, 2005 (hereinafter,
the “Service Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, pursuant to clauses 2.1 and 2.2 of the Service Agreement, Employer agreed to employ
Employee, and Employee agreed to serve in the employ of the Employer, on an exclusive and full-time
basis, as the Senior Vice President — Finance of Employer, until November 30, 2006, subject to
earlier termination pursuant to the provisions of the Service Agreement; and



     WHEREAS, on March 17, 2005, effective March 31, 2005, Employee was appointed Chief Financial
Officer and Senior Vice President; and



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained Employer and
Employee hereto agree as follows:



     1. Extension of Term of Service Agreement. Employer agrees to employ the Employee,
and the Employee agrees to serve in the employ of the Employer, on an exclusive and full-time
basis, as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, subject to the supervision and
direction of that person or persons set forth in the Service Agreement, until November 30, 2007,
unless such period is sooner terminated by either party giving the other not less than three (3)
months written notice subject to the provisions of clauses 13.1 or 13.3 of the Service Agreement.



     2. Continuance in Force of Service Agreement. Other than as specifically amended
hereby, the terms and provisions of the Service Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



 






[Signature page follows.]




1









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer and the Employee have signed this Amendment, effective
as of the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	“EMPLOYER”	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CRONOS CONTAINERS LIMITED	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By
	 	/s/ John C. Kirby
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Its
	 	Director	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	“EMPLOYEE”	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	   /s/ Frank P. Vaughan	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	FRANK P. VAUGHAN	 	 







2
Guarantee, dated August 13, 2004



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 NOTATION OF GUARANTEE 
  
 For value received, each Guarantor (which term includes any successor Person under the Indenture) has, jointly and severally, unconditionally guaranteed,
to the extent set forth in the Indenture and subject to the provisions in the Indenture dated as of August 13, 2004 (the “Indenture”) among Innophos, Inc., (the “Company”), Innophos Mexico Holdings, LLC, as
guarantor, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”) (a) the due and punctual payment of the principal of, premium and Liquidated Damages, if any, and interest on, the Notes, whether at maturity, by
acceleration, redemption or otherwise, the due and punctual payment of interest on overdue principal of and interest on the Notes, if any, if lawful, and the due and punctual performance of all other obligations of the Company to the Holders or the
Trustee all in accordance with the terms of the Indenture and (b) in case of any extension of time of payment or renewal of any Notes or any of such other obligations, that the same will be promptly paid in full when due or performed in accordance
with the terms of the extension or renewal, whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise. The obligations of the Guarantors to the Holders of Notes and to the Trustee pursuant to the Guarantee and the Indenture are expressly set forth in
Article 11 of the Indenture and reference is hereby made to the Indenture for the precise terms of the Guarantee. Each Holder of a Note, by accepting the same, (a) agrees to and shall be bound by such provisions (b) authorizes and directs the
Trustee, on behalf of such Holder, to take such action as may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate the subordination as provided in the Indenture and (c) appoints the Trustee attorney-in-fact of such Holder for such purpose. 
  
 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings given to them
in the Indenture. 
  

					
	 INNOPHOS MEXICO HOLDINGS, LLC

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Mark Feuerbach

	 	 	 Name:
	 	 Mark Feuerbach

	 	 	 Title:
	 	 Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4012 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4012

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
    To amend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 to 
reauthorize for 2 additional years the public school and private school 
         tuition assistance programs established under the Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 5-YEAR REAUTHORIZATION OF TUITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

    (a) Public School Program.--Section 3(i) of the District of 
Columbia College Access Act of 1999 (sec. 38--2702(i), D.C. Official 
Code) is amended by striking ``each of the five succeeding fiscal 
years'' and inserting ``each of the 7 succeeding fiscal years''.
    (b) Private School Program.--Section 5(f) of such Act (sec. 38--
2704(f), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ``each of the five 
succeeding fiscal years'' and inserting ``each of the 7 succeeding 
fiscal years''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4353 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4353

 To require the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to provide 
tenant-based rental housing vouchers for certain residents of federally 
                           assisted housing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2004

Mr. LaTourette introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to provide 
tenant-based rental housing vouchers for certain residents of federally 
                           assisted housing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VOUCHER ASSISTANCE.

    (a) Cancellation of Contract.--Notwithstanding any other provision 
of law, upon payment in full of the obligation under the mortgage for 
the East Crown Apartments in Akron, Ohio, that is insured by the 
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development under section 236 of the 
National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715z-1) and the availability, to the 
public housing agency referred to in subsection (b), of the rental 
assistance specified in such subsection, the Secretary of Housing and 
Urban Development shall terminate the following agreements relating to 
such property:
            (1) The Regulatory Agreement and the Use Agreement and 
        Second Amendment of Regulatory Agreement for FHA Project No. 
        042-44059/042-10016.
            (2) Housing Assistance Payments Contract No. OH 12L000199.
    (b) Tenant-Based Rental Assistance.--The Secretary of Housing and 
Urban Development shall make available to the Akron Metropolitan 
Housing Authority of Akron, Ohio, tenant-based rental assistance under 
section 8(o) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f) 
in the amount necessary to provide incremental vouchers under such 
section for 108 families. Rental assistance amounts made available 
under this section shall be used only for families who are residing in 
the property described in subsection (a) upon the date of the 
termination of the agreements described in such subsection.
    (c) Funding.--Any amounts previously obligated for housing 
assistance for the property described in subsection (a) that become 
unobligated because of the termination of the contract referred to in 
paragraph (2) of such subsection shall be used by the Secretary of 
Housing and Urban Development in providing assistance under subsection 
(b).
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income  Fund V, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:   November 10, 2004              /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                       Name:   Robert A. Bourne
                                       Title:  President and Treasurer

                                      A   signed   original   of  this   written
                                      statement required by Section 906 has been
                                      provided  to CNL Income  Fund V, Ltd.  and
                                      will be  retained  by CNL  Income  Fund V,
                                      Ltd. and furnished to the  Securities  and
                                      Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon
                                      request.
Exhibit 32.2
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magnitude  Information Systems,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2004 (the
"Form  10-QSB"),  I, Joerg H. Klaube,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify, as of the date hereof,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge,  the Company's Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Security  Exchange  Act of 1934  and that the
information  contained  in the Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 12, 2004                    By: /s/ Joerg H. Klaube
                                                -------------------------
                                                Joerg H. Klaube
                                                Chief Financial Officer
#### Carper et al., Appellants, *v.*Village of Helena, Appellee.

(No. 459

— Decided April 25, 1949.)

*Messrs. Hull & Hawk,*for appellants.

*Messrs. Ludwig db Busick,*for appellee.

Carpenter, J.

This is an action to enjoin the enforcement of a judgment of a justice of the peace on the ground it was void. From a judgment for the defendant, this appeal on questions of law was taken. The vital assignment of error is that the judgment is contrary to law.

In the justice court the defendant herein, Village of Helena, obtained a judgment against the plaintiffs, who now contend that the justice lost jurisdiction of the cause for the reason that his judgment was not entered “on or by the fourth day” after the close of the trial, as required by Section 10378, General Code.

From the justice’s transcript it appears that the trial was had and the “case taken under advisement” December 20, 1947. On December 26, brief of defendant was filed; December 31, brief of plaintiff filed, and January 2,1948, “decision made in favor of plaintiff.”

At the hearing in this cause, the justice testified that at the close of the trial counsel for defendant asked permission to file a brief.

*542Section 10378, General Code, requires that such judgment “shall be entered either at the close of the trial, or if the justice then desires further time to consider, on or by the fourth day thereafter, both days inclusive. ’ ’

In the recent decision of *Monahan*v. *Beams,*66 Ohio App., 263, 33 N. E. (2d), 47, in a case on all fours with this, it was decided that the justice of the peace lost jurisdiction after four days passed before entering judgment. There the justice’s record disclosed that counsel for defendant requested permission to submit a brief.

In *Tussing*v. *Evans,*7 C. C. (N. S.), 237, 17 C. D., 685, affirmed without opinion, *Evans*v. *Tussing,*76 Ohio St., 618, 81 N. E., 1188, the court said that jurisdiction can not be conferred by consent of the parties upon a justice of the peace to reserve a decision to a later date than that authorized by statute.

That such is the force of Section 10378, General Code, has been the unbroken line of decisions by the courts since *Dunlap*v. *Robinson, Admr.,*12 Ohio St., 530.

This being the rule, on the undisputed facts in this case the judgment of the justice of the peace was void. The trial court erred in dismissing the plaintiff’s petition, and that judgment will be reversed and, on the undisputed facts, final judgment will be entered for plaintiffs.

*Judgment reversed and final judgment for*plaintiffs.

Conn and Fess, JJ., concur.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-5075

MICHAEL KAWA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 06-CV-448,

Judge George W. Miller.

ON MOTION

Before NEWMAN Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Michael Kawa moves without opposition to stay the briefing schedule pending the

United States Court of Federal Claims's disposition of Kawa's Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)

motion to vacate the judgment.

We grant Kawa's motion. If the trial court intends to grant the motion, it should

so inform the parties and the parties may then promptly move this court to remand the

case. The trial court may deny the motion without a remand by this court.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. The briefing schedule is stayed. If no action is taken by

the trial court within 45 days of the date of filing of this order, the parties should file a

status report with this court.
FOR THE COURT

MAY 2 9 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk PILE

U.S. COURT	

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

cc:	Joseph A. Camardo, Jr., Esq.

Leslie Cayer Ohta, Esq.

s19

MAY 2 9 2009

JAN HURIJALY

CLERK

2009-5075	 2
Exhibit 23


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

  We consent to the incorporation by reference into the
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 33-44376) and Forms S-8
(No. 33-44373, 33-44374 and 33-44375) of Mercantile Bankshares
Corporation of our report dated January 22, 1996, on our audit
of the consolidated financial statements of Mercantile
Bankshares Corporation and Affiliates as of December 31, 1995,
and 1994 and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, which report is included in
this Form 10-K.


            COOPERS & LYBRAND

Baltimore, Maryland
March 28, 1996
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's unaudited financial statements for the three months ended November 30,
1995.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                         424,785
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               427,313
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 427,313
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,374
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,002
<OTHER-SE>                                     415,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   427,313
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,099
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,753)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,753)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,753)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
10979.

#### Ward *v.*Ward.

Decided January 27, 1920.

Broyles, C. J.

1. Whoever attacks the validity of a marriage has the burden of proving its invalidity, by clear, distinct, and positive proof. The presumption as to the validity of a marriage can only be negatived by disproving every reasonable possibility. *Murchison*v. *Green,*128 *Ga.*339, 342 (57 S. E. 709, 11 L. R. A. (N. S.) 702); 26 Cyc. 877 (2).

2. Where a second marriage by a person is established and it is shown that he or she had previously married another person who was living at the time of the second marriage, the presumption is that the first marriage had been dissolved by a decree of divorce, and the burden is upon the person attacking the validity of the second marriage to show that a divorce had not been granted. 26 Cyc. 880 (4), note 37, and authorities there cited.

3. Under the above rulings and the facts of the instant case, the court did not err in directing a verdict for the caveatrix; and the error in allowing, over the objections of the other party, oral testimony to the effect that the caveatrix had secured a divorce from her first husband was harmless and does not require a new trial. If this illegal evidence had been eliminated, a finding in favor of thq validity of the second marriage of the caveatrix would still have been demanded.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*

*696Application, for administration—appeal, from Floyd superior court—Judge Wright. August 1, 1919.

*M: B. Eubanks,*for plaintiff in error.

*Maddox & Boyle,*contra.