alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                            MOORE CORPORATION LIMITED
           EXHIBIT 11 - CALCULATION OF EARNINGS AND EARNINGS PER SHARE
          UNDER UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
                      (Expressed in United States currency)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    1999                       1998                       1997
                                                    ----                       ----                       ----
<S>                                              <C>                        <C>                       <C>
Net earnings (loss) as determined
under United States generally
accepted accounting principles
(000's)(1)                                       $    72,884                $  (454,142)               $   (1,206)
                                                 =======================    =======================    =======================


Weighted average number of
shares outstanding
       - Basic                                    88,456,940                 88,455,512                 93,200,395
       - Diluted                                  89,209,291                 89,013,151                 93,611,677

Earnings (loss) per share
       - Basic                                   $      0.82                $     (5.13)               $    (0.01)
                                                 =======================    =======================    =======================
       - Diluted                                 $      0.82                $     (5.13)               $    (0.01)
                                                 =======================    =======================    =======================
</TABLE>



(1)  Refer to Note 25 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements on
     pages 47 to 51 of the Moore Corporation Limited 1999 Annual Report to
     Shareholders.

















                                       E-1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1




                                 August 7, 1998



Hastings Entertainment, Inc.
3601 Plains Blvd., Suite #1
Amarillo, Texas  79102

       Re:    Registration of 60,106 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01
              per share, pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-8

Ladies and Gentlemen:

       We have acted as counsel for Hastings Entertainment, Inc., a Texas
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the registration under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), pursuant to a
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement"), of 60,106
shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Company (the "Common
Stock") to be offered pursuant to the Hastings Entertainment, Inc. Associates'
401(K) Plan and Trust Agreement (the "Plan").

       Based upon our examination of such document and the investigation of
such matters of law as we have deemed relevant or necessary in rendering this
opinion, we hereby advise you that we are of the opinion that:

              Assuming, with respect to shares of Common Stock issued after the
date hereof, (i) the receipt of proper consideration for the issuance thereof
in excess of par value thereof, (ii) the availability of a sufficient number of
shares of Common Stock authorized by the Company's Articles of Incorporation
then in effect, (iii) compliance with the terms of any agreement entered into
in connection with any options or restricted stock under the Plan, and (iv) no
change occurs in the applicable law or the pertinent facts, the shares of
Common Stock purchasable upon the exercise of any option granted under or
issued upon the awarding of any restricted stock under, the Plan will upon
issuance be duly authorized and validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable
shares of Common Stock.
<PAGE>   2
Hastings Entertainment, Inc.
August 7, 1998
Page 2



       We consent to the filing of this opinion as Exhibit 5.1 to the
Registration Statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the registration under the Securities Act, of 60,106 shares of
Common Stock of the Company covered by the Plan.  By so consenting, we do not
thereby admit that our firm's consent is required by Section 7 of the
Securities Act.


                                           Very truly yours,

                                           LOCKE PURNELL RAIN HARRELL
                                           (A Professional Corporation)


                                           By:   /s/ Kent Jamison               
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                      Kent Jamison
**TKP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0604 ST ATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appell ee , v. PRESTON CSOO ROSSBACH,

Defendant and Appellan

t
. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for leave to file an overlength brief , and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted leave to file a response brief of not more than 17,200 words.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 5 2024

01/05/2024

Case Number: DA 20-0604
#### Jeffrey A. KLEINMAN, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 00-3360.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: May 15, 2001.

Before MICHEL, RADER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: *AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Sean M. Cary, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Willamette Valley
Vineyards, Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small
business issuer and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: December 6, 2004
/s/ Sean M. Cary
    Sean M. Cary
    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Mexco Energy Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the SEC on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tamala L. McComic, Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Dated:  June 23, 2006    /s/  Tamala L. McComic
                         -----------------------------------------------------
                         Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



42      The May Department Stores Company Exhibit 32 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. § 1350, As Adopted) In connection with the Annual Report of The May Department Stores Company (the Company) on
Form 10-K/A for the period ending January 29, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, John L.
Dunham, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas D. Fingleton, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: May 9, 2005 /s/
    
    John L. Dunham
    
    
    
    /s/
    
    Thomas D. FingletonJohn L. Dunham
    
    
    
    
    
    Thomas D. FingletonChairman, President and
    
    
    
    
    
    Executive Vice President andChief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    
    
    Chief Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

J.C., the f ather, Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, the GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM, and R.G., the f ather

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 19

- 1394

[ October 3, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Robert B. Meadows , Judge; L.T. Case No. 562018DP000241 (B)

.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant Regional Counsel, of the Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach

, for appellant

.

Sarah J. Rumph of Children ’ s Legal Services, Tallahassee, for appellee
Florida Department of Children and Families

.

Thomasina Moore and Laura J. Lee of Florida Statewide Guard ian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for appellee Guardian ad Litem Program

.

Christopher Hicks of the Law Office of Christopher A. Hicks, Vero
Beach

, for appellee R.G ., the father.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN
, C IKLIN and G ERBER
, JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Continuing Education Units

VERIFICATION OF ATTENDANCE FORM

Certification Number:________________

 attended the following professional educational activity. 

(NAME)

Title: National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) Webinar: Advancing Skills-Based Education and 

Hiring Through the Open Skills Network

Date(s): March 17, 2021 CEU Hours Earned: 1 hr 

Sponsor(s): National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 

Explanation of Event: This webinar provided insights from diverse stakeholders for why the cybersecurity education, 

training, and workforce development community is uniquely poised to help empower learners to more rapidly and seamlessly 

move between education and work along a skills-based career pathway. Webinar attendees heard presentations from: 

• Deborah Everhart, Chief Strategy Officer, Credential Engine

• Dr. Gwendolyn Britton, Academic Associate Vice President, Southern New Hampshire University

• Phil Komarny, Vice President of Innovation, Salesforce

Location: Virtual Webinar; www.nist.gov/nice/webinars

Name of Meeting Host: Rodney Petersen, Director of the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE)

 

Contact Information:

nist.gov/nice

nist.nice@nist.gov

The Continuing Education Units form is provided as a courtesy. It is the responsibility of the 

attendee to complete and submit with their certifying authority.
#### James Finley *v.*R. M. Woodman.

Witnesses — Transaction Between Witness and Deceased Person.

Under the statute, the rule of evidence as to the competency of witnesses, a party is not prohibited from testifying in his own behalf in regard to what took place between himself and one who is dead, where the deceased could only be a witness if living.

APPEAL PROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT.

November 15, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

There is no reason why the judgment should be disturbed. This is the third trial of the cause, there being two verdicts for the appellee, and one resulting in a hung jury. Although the counterclaim or rather set-off, may be improperly pleaded, still there was no demurrer; but on the contrary the appellant, in his reply, tendered an issue by denying that the logs were sold or delivered to him. The statements of the agent of the appellant were properly admitted. The death of the agent does not prevent the parties to the record from testifying; they were in court to speak for themselves. The provision of the statute enlarging the rule of evidence as to the competency of those called to testi-*310fy, does not prohibit a party from testifying in his own behalf in regard to what took place between himself and one who is dead and could only be a witness if living. If the matter about which he is called on to testify is admissible, although a party to the action, he may testify in regard to it.

*Apperson & Reed, T. Turner, for appellant.*

*Termy, Holt, for appellee.*

We can not determine the basis on which the jury rendered their verdict. They may have refused to include in their estimate the small note as the appellee swore that he never signed it or authorized it to be done. Applying, however, the account as a credit on the notes from the time the lumber was delivered, and allowing the appellant all of his claims, the judgment is not for too much, and if it was, still, as before suggested, the jury may have disallowed the small note.

The judgment must be affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED LIN HOLDINGS CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF
INCOME.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001062707
<NAME> LIN HOLDINGS CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          17,722                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,836                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,067                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,503                       1
<PP&E>                                         124,842                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,267                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,802,940                       1
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,992                       0
<BONDS>                                        500,561                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     554,894                       1
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,802,940                       1
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,211                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,973                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   462                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    95                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,270                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,444)                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (215)                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,229)                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,229)                       0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
Opinion issued September 27, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-00860-CR

———————————

IN RE DENNIS LEN LIVINGS, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Dennis Len Livings, has filed a pro se petition for writ of 

mandamus in this Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also

TEX. R. APP. P. 52. Relator complains that the trial court1has failed to rule on 

 

1 Relator provides information indicating that this original proceeding arises out of 

Cause No. 1035169-A, styled Ex Parte Dennis Len Livings, 174th District Court, 
2

motions relator has filed in aid of his post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. 

This Court, as an intermediate appellate court, has no jurisdiction over postconviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases.2

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.

ANN. art. 11.05, art. 11.07, § 3(a), (b) (Vernon 2005 & Vernon Supp. 2012); In re 

McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. 

proceeding) (noting that “only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has 

jurisdiction in final post-conviction felony proceedings”). Thus, we also lack 

jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief in matters related to a post-conviction writ 

application. See In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d at 717–18; see also In re Perryman, No 

04–11–00300–CR, 2011 WL 2165145, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 25, 

2011, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.; not designated for pub.) (dismissing petition for 

writ of mandamus in case in which relator complained that trial court failed to rule 

on motions related to a post-conviction petition for writ of habeas corpus).

 

Harris County. Relator identifies the Honorable Ruben Guerrrero as the 

respondent in this original mandamus proceeding. 

2 Relator was convicted of the felony offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child 

and sentenced to a mandatory life sentence as a repeat sex offender. We affirmed 

relator’s conviction in Livings v. State, No. 01–06–00146–CR, 2007 WL 1500300, 

at *7 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] May 24, 2007, pet. ref’d) (mem. op.; not 

designated for pub.).
3

We dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
El Sistema de Gestión de Calidad en que se apoyan los servicios 

de medición, según se define en una moción del Grupo de 

Trabajo del Sistema de Calidad (QSTF), ha sido revisado y se 

ha determinado que cumple con los requisitos de ISO/IEC 

17025:2017 y ISO 17034:2016, bajo mandato del Sistema 

Interamericano de Metrología en apoyo de las expectativas del 

Acuerdo de Reconocimiento Mutuo del CIPM.

Georgette Macdonald, Quality System Task Force Chair

Claire Saundry, President, SIM

APROBACIÓN DEL SISTEMA DE 

GESTIÓN DE LA CALIDAD

APPROVAL OF 

QUALITY MANAGEMENT 

SYSTEM 

National Institute of Standards and Technology – The United States of 

America 

Optical Properties of Materials

The Quality Management System supporting measurement 

services, as defined in a motion of the Quality System Task 

Force (QSTF), has been reviewed and found to be in 

conformance with the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2017 

and ISO 17034:2016, under the mandate of the Inter-American 

Metrology System in support of the expectations of the CIPM 

Mutual Recognition Arrangement.

Approval date: 24 September 2019

Expiration date: 24 September 2024
EXHIBIT 4.3


 


Employment agreement – Mr Ahmed Fahour (as Chief
Executive Officer, Australia)


 


The employment
agreement of Mr Ahmed Fahour is incorporated by reference to National Australia
Bank Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Commission on January 20, 2005.