alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6725
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RIGOBERTO MUNOZ PICAZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:03-cr-00201) Submitted: October 18, 2007 Decided: October 24, 2007 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rigoberto Munoz Picaz, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Rigoberto Munoz Picaz appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Picaz , No. 5:03-cr-00201 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mexco Energy Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending  March 31,  2004,  as filed with the SEC on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nicholas C. Taylor, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:  June 29, 2004                        /s/ Tamala L. McComic
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
                                             Financial Officer
Agreement between SAIC and Thomas E. Darcy


 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 TERMINATION OF SEVERANCE PROTECTION AGREEMENT 
  
 This Termination (“Termination”) of that certain Severance Protection Agreement dated as of September 1, 2005
(the “Agreement”) by and between Science Applications International Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“SAIC”) and Thomas E. Darcy, (“Darcy”) is made as of this 28th day of November, 2005 by and between SAIC and Darcy. Capitalized terms used herein which are not defined herein shall have the definition ascribed to them in
the Agreement. 
  
 RECITALS 
  
 WHEREAS, SAIC and Darcy are parties to the Agreement and have agreed to
terminate the Agreement. 
  
 WHEREAS, the parties are willing to
enter into this Termination to terminate the Agreement. 
  
 In
consideration of the foregoing and the promises and covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  
 1. TERMINATION OF THE AGREEMENT. The Agreement is terminated
effective as of November 28, 2005. 
  
 2.
COUNTERPARTS. This Termination may be executed in any number of counterparts, each which will be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute one instrument. 
  
 3. GOVERNING LAW. This Termination shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the
State of Delaware without giving effect to the conflict of laws principles thereof. All disputes relating to this Termination, including its enforceability, shall be resolved by final and binding arbitration before an arbitrator appointed by the
Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Service (JAMS), in accordance with the rules and procedures of arbitration under the Company’s Dispute Resolution Program, attached as Exhibit B to the Agreement, with the arbitration to be held in San Diego,
California. 
  
 5. FURTHER ASSURANCES. The parties agree
to execute such further instruments, agreements and documents and to take such further action as may reasonably be necessary to carry out the intent of this Termination. 
  
 This Termination is hereby executed as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,
 a Delaware corporation

		
	By:	 	/s/ BERNIE THEULE
		
	 Title:  
	 	Senior Vice President, Corporate Human Resources
	
	 DARCY:

	
	 /s/ THOMAS E. DARCY

	 Thomas E. Darcy
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Associates First Capital Corporation on Form S-3 (File No. 333-    ) of our
report dated January 20, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Associates First Capital Corporation as of December 31, 1997 and
1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995. We also
consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts."


                                              /s/  Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


Dallas, Texas
May 29, 1998
CERTIFICATIONS

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

I, Daniel P. Beharry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mera Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

      a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
            material information relating to the Company, including its
            consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
            those entities, particularly during the period in which this
            quarterly report is being prepared;

      b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
            procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
            this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
            effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
            evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
            controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
            identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in
            internal controls; and

      b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
            internal controls; and

6. The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 19, 2005


/s/ DANIEL P. BEHARRY
---------------------
Daniel P. Beharry
Chief Executive Officer
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Ex parte Angel Alberto Ruiz Vallesteros

N o. 06

- 24

- 00040

- CR Appeal from the County Court of Kinney County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 13329CR ).

Panel consists of Chief Justice Stevens and

Justices van Cleef and Rambin. Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

van Cleef

. Concurring and Dissenting Opinion delivered by Justice Rambin.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of

the court belo w. Therefore, we reverse the judgme nt of the trial court and remand the cause for

further proceedings.

We note that Angel Alberto Ruiz Vallesteros has adequately indicated his inability to pay

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDE RED APRIL 1 6 , 2024
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SCOTT E. STEVENS
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTES T: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Renaissance Entertainment Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles S.Leavell, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Charles S. Leavell |   |
|--------|------------------------|--------|
|   | Charles S.  Leavell    |

 

----
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4348

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to allow greater access to 

international remittance services, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2004

Mr. BACA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to allow greater 

access to international remittance services, and for other 

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Financial Services for 

5 All Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AMENDMENT. 

7 Paragraph (12) of section 107 of the Federal Credit 

8 Union Act is amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(12) in accordance with regulations prescribed 

10 by the Board—
2

•HR 4348 IH 

1 ‘‘(A) to sell or provide for a fee negotiable 

2 checks (including travelers checks), money or3 ders, international money transmitting or trans4 fer services, and other similar money transfer 

5 instruments and services (including electronic 

6 fund transfers); and 

7 ‘‘(B) to cash checks and money orders and 

8 receive electronic fund transfers for a fee;’’.

Æ
Exhibit 10.2



Exhibit 10.2

 

Design Source, Inc.

100 Europa Drive

Suite 455

Chapel Hill, NC 27517


 

 

August 5, 2005


Leonard Homer

President

Essential Business Solutions

POB 12315

RTP, NC 27709


 

Dear Mr. Homer,


In consideration of the extended time it has taken to get the company through the regulatory process it has become necessary for us to postpone the start up of operations. I am writing today to propose that we extend the current contract in its entirety dated February 2005, for one additional year to end on June 30, 2006. If this meets with your approval please sign and date this letter and return it to me at the address above. This letter will become an addendum to our earlier agreement.


Thank you for your continued support of our efforts.


Sincerely,


 

 

Peter Reichard

President


 

 

Approved by: /s/ Leonard C. Homer            Date:8-12-05
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Broadband, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc Urbach, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Broadband, Inc. and will be retained by China Broadband, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 November 22, 2010

/s/ Marc UrbachMarc Urbach, President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
 
 The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

SHAKARA THOMAS CARTER,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10333

D.C. No. 2:06-cr-00468-EJG-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Edward J. Garcia, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 11, 2011** 

San Francisco, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Shakara Thomas Carter seeks to appeal from the district court’s

entry of judgment. Reviewing Defendant’s unpreserved objection for plain error,

United States v. Dominguez Benitez, 542 U.S. 74, 76 (2004), we affirm.

FILED

AUG 15 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

The district court erred by failing to advise Defendant of some of his trial

rights, as required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(1)(E). But that

error did not affect Defendant’s substantial rights. We have reviewed the entire

record, and we conclude that Defendant has not shown that there is a reasonable

probability that he would not have pleaded guilty. See Dominguez Benitez, 542

U.S. at 76 (holding that "a defendant is obliged to show a reasonable probability

that, but for the error, he would not have entered the plea").

Because Defendant waived his right to appeal in the plea agreement, he may

not appeal his sentence. See United States v. Portillo-Cano, 192 F.3d 1246, 1250

(9th Cir. 1999) (holding that "waivers of appeal must stand or fall with the

agreement of which they are a part" (internal quotation marks omitted)).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 21.1SUBSIDIARIES OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC.       Entity Jurisdiction1. Trim Systems Inc. Delaware     2. Trim Systems Operating Corp. Delaware     3. CVG International Holdings Limited Barbados     4. CVG Vehicle Components (Shanghai) Co. LTD. China     5. CVS Holdings Limited United Kingdom     6. Commercial Vehicle Systems Limited United Kingdom     7. Bostrom Limited United Kingdom     8. Bostrom Investments Limited United Kingdom     9. KAB Seating LLC United Kingdom     10. Bostrom International Limited United Kingdom     11. KAB Seating AB Sweden     12. KAB Seating Pty Australia     13. KAB Seating S.A. Belgium     14. National Seating Company Delaware     15. KAB Seating Limited United Kingdom     16. A. Stokes Pressings Limited United Kingdom     17. Wilton & Co. Pressings Limited United Kingdom
 

 
     18. Bostrom Specialist Engineering Limited United Kingdom     19. Winston Cable Limited United Kingdom     20. JMH Limited United Kingdom     21. KAB Tooling Limited United Kingdom     22. Bostrom Europe United Kingdom     23. The C&P Jig & Tool Limited United Kingdom     24. BB Seating Limited United Kingdom     25. Palmer & Shelley Limited United Kingdom     26. AJW Holdings Limited United Kingdom     27. KAB Industries Limited United Kingdom     28. Corvus Suspension Products Limited United Kingdom     29. KAB Pressings Limited United Kingdom     30. KAB Components Limited United Kingdom     31. AJ Williams Small Pressings Limited United Kingdom     32. Bostrom Vehicle Components Limited United Kingdom     33. Inbark Limited United Kingdom     34. KAB Engineering Limited United Kingdom     35. CVS Holdings Inc. Delaware     36. Sprague Devices Delaware     37. CVG Management Corp Delaware     38. CVG Logistics LLC Delaware
 

 
     39. Mayflower Vehicle Systems LLC Delaware     40. T.S. Mexico S.DE R. L. DE C.V. Mexico     41. Monona Corporation Delaware     42. Monona Wire Corporation Iowa     43. Monona (Mexico) Holdings LLC Illinois     44. MWC de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V. Mexico     45. EMD Servicios S.A. de C.V. Mexico     46. Cabarrus Plastics Inc. North Carolina     47. CVG European Holdings, LLC Delaware     48. CVG International GP Bermuda     49. C.I.E.B. Kahovec, spol. s.r.o. Czech Republic     50. CVG Czech Management s.r.o. Czech Republic     51. CVG Global s.a.r.l. Luxembourg     52. CVG Czech I Czech Republic     53. PEKM Kabeltechnik s.r.o. Czech Republic     54. Prettl MKRT Ukraine LLC Ukraine     55. CVG Oregon LLC Delaware     56. CVG CS LLC Delaware
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund V, Ltd. at March 31, 1999, and its  statement of income
for the three months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10-Q of CNL Income Fund V,  Ltd. for the three  months  ended March 31,
1999.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,764,502
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  170,804
<ALLOWANCES>                                   141,505
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         11,514,999
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,819,239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17,433,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     16,430,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17,433,208
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               397,585
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  150,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                703,071
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            703,071
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   703,071
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the  nature  of  its  industry,  CNL  Income  Fund  V,  Ltd.  has  an
unclassified balance sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown  above for  current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
GQnited States Department of Conmmerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

New Hampshire

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international
system of units (SI), documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully complet-
ed training and proficiency tests, documented calibration intervals, submitted a quality management system, and demonstrated
suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State
Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2005.

2014 - 2015
Scope
Mass Echelon | Mass Echelon III
30 kg to 1 mg 50 kg to 1 mg ; ,
f f
50 Ib to 0.001 Ib 100 Ib to 0.001 Ib W/4, /} |
( i Jf / f
Mass Echelon I 8 02 to 0.01 oz laut / kLbrt,,
30 kg to 1 mg Volume Gravimetric, | .
Carol T. Hockert, Chief
50 Ib to 0.001 Ib 20 NIST Office of Weights and Measures
8 0z to 0.01 oz 5 gal

Effective Dates: 2014-01-01 to 2015-12-31
Volume Transfer, II

5 gal Amended 2014-12-31
Correct Volume Gravimetric, |

(Rev.: March 2013)