alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4540 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Blue 80. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2004 

Mr. LANGEVIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Blue 80. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON ACID BLUE 80. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.32.02 Acid Blue 80 Acid Blue 80 

(CAS number 4474–24–2) 

provided for in subheading 

3204.12.50 ........................... Free Free No Change On or before 

12/31/2006 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 
2 

•HR 4540 IH 

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GURPREET KAUR,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-73285

Agency No. A076-865-536

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Gurpreet Kaur, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen

removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

FILED

JUN 23 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-73285

abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d

988, 992 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Kaur’s second motion to

reopen as time-barred and number-barred where the successive motion was filed

over three years after the BIA’s final decision, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and

Kaur failed to present sufficient evidence of changed circumstances in India to

qualify for an exception to the time and number limits, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)

(ii); see also Toufighi, 538 F.3d at 996-97 (underlying adverse credibility

determination rendered evidence of changed circumstances immaterial).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 17, 2016

jam 

# Order

Clerk May 17, 2016

15 3300 (2 5 )

DEMAREO JAMINE ALLEN

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 15 3300

COA: 3 30153

KINROSS CORRECTION AL FACILITY

WARDEN

,

Defendant

- Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the order of

April 19 , 201 6 is granted. Plaintiff, having paid an initial partial filing fee of $21.00,

shall make monthly payments to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50

percent of the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance

due of $354.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff s hall not file further appeals in civil actions

in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full.
Standards are Everywhere: an 

Information Literacy Approach 

to Standards Education

Prof. Margaret Phillips, phill201@purdue.edu

Prof. Paul McPherson, pmcphers@purdue.edu

Prof. Michael Fosmire, fosmire@purdue.edu
Program Objectives

• Develop an open-access, introductory-level, 

interactive online standards education program 

• Provide micro-credentials for students to 

demonstrate standards competence to potential 

employers, etc. 
Outputs

• ~700 undergraduate Purdue engineering technology students reached since 

Fall 2017; additional engineering faculty and students at the University of 

Buffalo using the materials

• 3,044 Project website views (https://guides.lib.purdue.edu/NIST_standards) 

• 79 students – submitted materials to earn badges; 25 badges awarded to date

• Three workshops conducted on project materials: 79 attendeesfrom 35 

institutions
exv10w2



 





Exhibit 10.2




Grant of Incentive Stock Option



Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Company’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), you
have been granted an Incentive Stock Option to purchase ___shares of stock as outlined below:




	 	 	 
	Granted To:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Grant Date:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Granted:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Grant Price:

	 	Total Cost to Exercise:
	 
	 	 
	Expiration Date:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Vesting Schedule:
	 	 





By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Grant on the date shown above, which
has been issued to me under the terms and conditions of the Plan. I further acknowledge receipt of
the copy of the Plan and agree to conform to all of the terms and conditions of the Grant and the
Plan.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Signature:

	 	 	 	Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM WORLDCOM,
INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         176,951
<SECURITIES>                                   117,081
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,335,017
<ALLOWANCES>                                   129,893
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,899,673
<PP&E>                                       6,734,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                 708,349
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,980,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,912,240
<BONDS>                                      6,144,718
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              125
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,747
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,656,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,980,623
<SALES>                                      5,429,777
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,429,777
<CGS>                                        2,849,097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,767,806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (32,673)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                76,246
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             288,621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                406,023
<INCOME-TAX>                                   260,776
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            145,247
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,857)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   122,563
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.6

The Board of Directors
of WorldCom, Inc.:

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement on Form S-3 of WorldCom, Inc. of our report dated February 12, 1998,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Brooks Fiber Properties, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which report appears in
the Form 8-K of WorldCom, Inc. dated May 28, 1998.

                                                       KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
June 12, 1998
Low Temperature CCR User Manual

Startup: 

1. Attach sample in desired holder, secure both heat shields, being careful not to 

over tighten them, and then screw on the outer cover. 

2. Open the valve and connect the vacuum port to a turbo pump. 

3. Pump the chamber down to the mid 10-4 Torr scale before starting the compressor. 

4. Turn on the Coolpac (tall blue box) first, then turn on the compressor (the smaller 

grey box). 

Operation is now done from the controller by entering a set point. 

During Operation: 

1. The compressor should remain on at all times, even when heating to 

high temperatures. This is to keep the cold stage from over heating. 

2. In the event that either sensor exceeds 340K the heater will be disabled and 

cannot be re-enabled until the temperature falls below 340K. 

3. To keep a good vacuum simply leave the turbo pump on at all times, although it is 

possible to close the valve and turn the pump off if necessary. 

4. If for any reason the compressor stops running turn off the heater and contact 

someone on the sample environment staff. 

Shutdown/Change of Sample: 

1. Turn off the compressor first and then turn off the Coolpac second. Leave the 

heater on with a set point of 300K. 

2. Close the vacuum port valve and turn off the pump, waiting until the four speed 

indicator lights on the turbo pump are off before removing the hose. 

3. Time permitting skip to step five. (Skipping step four adds approximately 2 

hours.) 

4. For a quicker shutdown/sample change vent the sample chamber with helium. 

Start by attaching a nipple to the vacuum port then purge the low pressure helium 

line and nipple and connect them together. Slowly open the valve and then close 

it. 

5. Once the cold stage approaches room temperature then open the outer cover. 

Using the helium technique this should be approximately half an hour.
9698.

#### City of Warrenton *v.*Smith.

Decided January 6, 1920.

Action for damages; from Warren superior court—Judge Walker. April *3,*1918. See 23 *Ga. App.*241.

*E. P. Davis,*for plaintiff in error.

*E. T. Shurley, Holden, Jennings & Holden,*contra.

Luke, J.

The petition set out no cause of action, and the court erred in overruling the general demurrer. See *City of Warrenton*v. *Smith,*149 *Ga.*567 (98 S. E. 71).

*Judgment reversed.*

*Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 417

To revoke a Public Land Order with respect to certain lands erroneously 

included in the Cibola National Wildlife Refuge, California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2003

Mr. HUNTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To revoke a Public Land Order with respect to certain lands 

erroneously included in the Cibola National Wildlife Refuge, California.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REVOCATION OF PUBLIC LAND ORDER WITH 

4 RESPECT TO LANDS ERRONEOUSLY IN5 CLUDED IN CIBOLA NATIONAL WILDLIFE 

6 REFUGE, CALIFORNIA. 

7 Public Land Order 3442, dated August 21, 1964, is 

8 revoked insofar as it applies to the following described 

9 lands: San Bernardino Meridian, T11S, R22E, sec. 6, all 

of lots 1, 16, and 17, and SE1⁄4 of SW1 10 ⁄4 in Imperial 
2

•HR 417 IH 

1 County, California, aggregating approximately 140.32 

2 acres. 

3 SEC. 2. RESURVEY AND NOTICE OF MODIFIED BOUND4 ARIES. 

5 The Secretary of the Interior shall, by not later than 

6 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act—

7 (1) resurvey the boundaries of the Cibola Na8 tional Wildlife Refuge, as modified by the revocation 

9 under section 1; 

10 (2) publish notice of, and post conspicuous 

11 signs marking, the boundaries of the refuge deter12 mined in such resurvey; and 

13 (3) prepare and publish a map showing the 

14 boundaries of the refuge.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001017362
<NAME> PEERLESS GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,471
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,691
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,081
<PP&E>                                           4,220
<DEPRECIATION>                                     969
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,028
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            48
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,711
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,787
<SALES>                                         15,999
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,138
<CGS>                                            6,052
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,530
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  16
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,875
<INCOME-TAX>                                       408
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,467
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,467
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In connection with this quarterly report of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony E. Applebaum, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.





|                       |     |                                           
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|Date:   March 10, 2008 | By: | /s/ Anthony E. Applebaum                  
|                       |     | Anthony E. Applebaum                      
|                       |     | Principal Financial and Accounting Officer





(ii) A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 4, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00961-CV

DIANNE CARROLL FITZPATRICK, Appellant

V.

STATE FINANCIAL SERVICES—SPRINGLEAF, INC. D/B/A SPRINGLEAF 

FINANCIAL SERVICES OF TEXAS, INC. F/K/A AMERICAN GENERAL 

FINANCIAL SERVICES OF TEXAS, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-65805

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal from an order denying a temporary injunction signed 

March 2, 2012. When permitted, appeals from interlocutory orders are accelerated. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 28.1. A notice of appeal in an accelerated appeal must be filed within 

twenty days after the order is signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b). Appellant’s notice of 

appeal was not filed until October 10, 2012, and is therefore untimely.
2

On November 8, 2012, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). On 

November 19, 2012, appellant filed a document entitled, “First Amended Notice of 

Appeal.” In the document, appellant, who is appearing pro se, argued the merits of her 

case, but she did not address this court’s jurisdiction. 

A timely filed notice of appeal is required to invoke this court’s jurisdiction. Tex.

R. App. P. 25.1(b). Because appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely, we lack 

jurisdiction over this attempted interlocutory appeal. We order the appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Brown and Busby.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON O RDER Appellate case name s : Miguel Zaragoza Fuentes , et al. v. Evangelina Lopez Guzman Zaragoza (Appellate Cause Number 01 - 16 - 00951 - CV ) In re Miguel Zaragoza Fuentes (Appellate Cause Number 01 - 16 - 00951 - CV ) In re Elsa Esther Carrillo Anchondo and Eagle Ridge Properties, LLC (Appellate Cause Number 01 - 16 - 00952 - CV ) Trial court case number: 2014 - 30215 Trial court: 245th District Court of Harris County Appellants in ab ove cause number 01 - 16 - 00251 - CV and relators in above cause numbers 01 - 16 - 00951 - CV and 01 - 16 - 00952 - CV have filed a n Opposed Emergency Joint Motion for Stay requesting an emergency stay of (1) Temporary Orders Pending Appeal signed by the trial court on Nov ember 23, 2016 and (2) execution or enforcement of the Final Decree of Divorce signed by the trial court on December 21, 2015. The motion to stay is granted in part . The Temporary Orders Pending Appeal signed on November 23, 2016 are ordered stayed pendin g further order from this Court. The Court requests a response from appellee and real part ies in interest regarding the request to stay execution or enforcement of the Final Decree of Divorce within 10 days from the date of this order . It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: /s/ J ane Bland Acting individually Date: December 2, 2016
II 

Calendar No. 609 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4359 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2004 

Received 

JUNE 25, 2004 

Read the first time 

JULY 6, 2004 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the child tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Credit Preserva5 tion and Expansion Act of 2004’’. 
2 

HR 4359 PCS 

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CHILD TAX CREDIT. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 24 of the 

3 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to child tax cred4 it) is amended to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘(a) ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT.—There shall be al6 lowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this chapter 

7 for the taxable year with respect to each qualifying child 

8 of the taxpayer an amount equal to $1,000.’’. 

9 (b) INCREASE IN PHASEOUT THRESHOLDS.—Para10 graph (2) of section 24(b) of such Code is amended to 

11 read as follows: 

12 ‘‘(2) THRESHOLD AMOUNT.—For purposes of 

13 paragraph (1), the term ‘threshold amount’ means 

14 $125,000 ($250,000 in the case of a joint return).’’. 

15 (c) ACCELERATION OF INCREASE IN REFUNDABLE

16 PORTION OF CREDIT.—Clause (i) of section 24(d)(1)(B) 

17 of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘(10 percent in the 

18 case of taxable years beginning before January 1, 2005)’’. 

19 (d) COMBAT PAY TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT.—Para20 graph (1) of section 24(d) of such Code is amended by 

21 adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘For pur22 poses of subparagraph (B), any amount excluded from 

23 gross income by reason of section 112 shall be treated as 

24 earned income which is taken into account in computing 

25 taxable income for the taxable year.’’. 
3 

HR 4359 PCS 

1 (e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2003. 

4 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF SUNSET. 

5 Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Rec6 onciliation Act of 2001 shall not apply to the provisions 

7 of, and amendments made by, sections 201 and 203 of 

8 such Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 20, 2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk. 
Calendar No. 609 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4359 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

increase the child tax credit. 

JULY 6, 2004 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
Exhibit 32.2

                            MICROPAC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                             CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Micropac  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending Novemeber 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Patrick Cefalu, CFO of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


 /s/ Patrick Cefalu
-----------------------------
Patrick Cefalu, CFO
(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit
      32 .2





Certification
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Imagenetix, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lowell W.
      Giffhorn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:
                November 12, 2008
            /s/LOWELL
                W. GIFFHORNLowell
                W. GiffhornChief
                Financial Officer