alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### J. T. Ashurst et al. *v.*Josh. B. Kinney et al.

Appeal — Reversal.

Tlie Court of Appeals can not reverse a judgment of tie circuit court for failure to do that which dt was not asked to do.

*365APPEAL FROM SCOTT CIRCUIT COURT.

December 13, 1873.

*Polk, for appellants.*

*Robinson, Adams, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The appellant, J. T. Ashurst, does not deny that the house and lot in Georgetown was levied on and sold by the sheriff of Scott County, under and by virtue of the execution in favor of Oldham and Scott, and that said realty was bought at the sheriff’s sale by the beneficial owner of the judgment,- Joseph B. Kinney. The averment that the sale was irregular, and made without proper authority, and therefore void, was properly disregarded by the circuit court. No irregularities are pointed out, and there is nothing in- the answer nor the proof supporting the legal conclusion that the sale was void. The cross-petition of Parish is not answered at all.

There is nothing in the case tending to, show that appellants were entitled to have the house and lot set apart to them as a homestead. They asked for no such relief, and there is no averment in their pleadings authorizing the court to grant it. They do state that at the time of the levy and sale, and when this suit was instituted, the house was occupied by them as a family residence. They do not, however, state directly that they were bona fide housekeepers with a family, nor that the house and lot was the only suitable homestead owned by them.

In the absence of such averments, and upon the failure of both appellant and his wife to ask the protection of the chancellor, no-other judgment than that appealed from' could have been rendered.

This court cannot reverse the action of the circuit court for failing to do that which it was not asked to, do. Judgment affirmed.

It is unnecessary to review the opinion in this cause. The question of appellants’ right to a.homestead out of the property sold, was not raised by the pleadings, nor settled by the court. It will be time enough when the court below, by proper pleadings, is asked to protect this right and improperly required to do so, to appeal to this court.

Petition overruled.
IoTAB

Personas

MarchA2023A(UPDATED)A

Members:

Debbie Reynolds, Debra Lam, Nicole Coughlin
Persona Categories

Manufacturer

Developer

Implementer

Administrator

Operator

Consumer
 

 

 

 

15 Barriers to IoT Adoption

Investment

Risk

Maturity/Complexity

Infrastructure

Standards

Policies

Access

Transparency

Change resistance

Cybersecurity

Data Privacy

Legal / Regulatory

Trust

Training / Education

Interoperability

Environmental Factors
IoTABA- PersonasA- BarriersAtoAAdoptionASetA1AofA4A 

Barriers Manufacturer Developer Implementer Administrator Operator Consumer

InvestmentA

RiskA

Maturity/ComplexityA

InfrastructureA

StandardsA
IoTABA- PersonasA- BarriersAtoAAdoptionASetA2AofA4A 

Barriers Manufacturer Developer Implementer Administrator Operator Consumer

PoliciesA

AccessA

TransparencyA

ChangeAresistanceA

CybersecurityA
 

IoTABA- PersonasA- BarriersAtoAAdoptionASetA3AofA4A 

Barriers Manufacturer Developer Implementer Administrator Operator Consumer

DataPrivacy

Legal/Regulatory

Trust

Training

Interoperability
IoTABA- PersonasA- BarriersAtoAAdoptionASetA4AofA4A 

Barriers Manufacturer Developer Implementer Administrator Operator Consumer

Environmental

Factors
 

 

Ask?

Do these personas illustrate the gaps?

What are we missing?
BASIA NASIOROWSKA 

Facial Recognition Identification Testing Utilizing Still & 

Live Twin Children Face Images 

IBPC 2010, Washington 

2nd – 4th March 2010 

www.interoptic.co.za 

basia@interoptic.co.za 

Tel: +27 82 733 0030 

www.interoptic.co.za 
Topic Area: Test Methods & Product 

Components; Identification Systems 

1. Aim – To develop methods to test Facial Recognition products. 

– Unique facial database of twin children created and live testing conducted 

since 2004. 

– Analysis of recognition of Twin siblings, ageing, Varying ethnicity. 

www.interoptic.co.za 
Research & Analysis 

Image quality & background noise 

1. Photo Searching Application: Photographs taken in Frankfurt plane, uncontrolled illumination. 

2. Surveillance Application: Live recognition performance test using Facial Recognition Systems 

indoors, partial artificial lighting. 

3. ISO/ICAO enrollment system: Comparison of effectiveness of automatically standardized 

images taken by digital camera. 

Table 2: Image Quality & Background Noise 

Year Colour Consistency Background 

Colour Texture 

2004 Inconsistent: Brown lighting & 

blue lighting 

Grey (9/20) 

Brown (11/20) 

Plain, wrinkled 

2005 Consistent Grey Plain 

2006 Consistent Grey Plain, wrinkled 

www.interoptic.co.za 
Testing 

Various tests conducted from 2004 – 2008 (extension to 2015) 

• General ageing: I.e. images from 2005 used to probe a twin children database from 2004 as 

reference. 

• Inverse ageing: I.e. images from 2005 used to probe a database with images from 2006 as 

reference. 

• Duplicate Analysis: Determining whether or not the system can 

differentiate between the twin siblings. 

General Observations 

• Using the inferior resolution images reduced the success rate and ability to differentiate between 

siblings. 

• Images with inconsistent light throughout and “wrinkled” are less suitable for testing 

www.interoptic.co.za
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  March 28, 2006



/s/ James H. Moore

James H. Moore

Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mines Management, Inc. and will be retained by Mines Management, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.









































46





---







47
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                         5
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1,700,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,719,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,054,000
<PP&E>                                         6,006,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                30,999,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         18,180,000
<BONDS>                                       12,874,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         117,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    12,145,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  30,999,000
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              15,088,000
<CGS>                                                  0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 14,081,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,178,000 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (171,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (171,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (171,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99-8

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, David E. Meador, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Michigan Consolidated Gas Company (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

(1)            the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual
               period ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
               the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
               Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)            the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

Date: March 20, 2003                        /s/ DAVID E. MEADOR
                                     ------------------------------------
                                              David E. Meador
                                         Senior Vice President and
                                         Chief Financial Officer of
                                     Michigan Consolidated Gas Company
FBI Latent Services

Best Practices & Time Utilization in 

Searching Local, State and Federal AFIS’

JEFF CARLYLE

FBI LABORATORY DIVISION

LATENT PRINT SUPPORT UNIT
FBI Latent Services

• IAFIS Repository Totals

– Criminal Master File 67.3 Million

– Civil 39.1 Million

– ULF 471,000

FBI Latent Services
FBI Latent Services

IAFIS Criminal Master File

CMF grows 8,000-10,000 new records a day 
FBI Latent Services

Repositories

FBI Laboratory Division

• CMF 

• Civil File

• ULF

• Special Latent Cognizant Files

Local, State, Federal, International

• CMF 

• Civil File

• ULF
FBI Latent Services

IAFIS 

2% Individualization on latent searches in 

IAFIS

10% On Casework

SEARCH YOU DATABASES!!!

UTILIZE YOUR RESOURCES!!!
FBI Latent Services

Current Image/Feature Statistics (IAFIS)

25,850 Latent Searches Per Month

22,560 Remote Latent Users (Local, State, OFOs)

 3,290 FBI Laboratory 

FBI Latent Services

IAFIS 
FBI Latent Services

Current Unsolved Latent File Statistics (IAFIS)

Unsolved Latent File 471,000

95% owned by 5 Latent Agencies

DOD 

Texas 

New York 

California 

FBI Lab 

FBI Latent Services

IAFIS 
FBI Latent Services

• IAFIS Latent Search Breakdown

– Largest Remote Latent Submitters Per Month

• DOD 16300 

• Texas 700 

• California 600 

• New York 500 

• New Jersey 500 

• USSS 500 

• US Postal 250 

• USACIL 250 

FBI Latent Services

IAFIS 
FBI Latent Services

• IAFIS Latent Search Image vs. Feature 

Search averages are what percentage

 ? 

FBI Latent Services
FBI Latent Services

95% Feature Searches

 5% Image Searches

IAFIS 
FBI Latent Services

Technological Upgrades

• Vender Technology and Capabilities

– 3-4 times more accurate and reliable as 1999 

technologies

– Interoperability is getting better....

• BE PROACTIVE!!!!! 

• MAKE A DIFFERENCE!!!!!
FBI Latent Services

• Candidates for Image Searches

– Large Images

– Clear ridge quality

• Candidates for Feature Searches

– Smudges

– Overlapping latents

– Checked background

NGI Latent Services
FBI Latent Services

NGI Latent Services

• No Ridge Count

• No Penetration Limitations

• ULW 2013 ease of usability for NGI functionality

– Transaction Manager

– Latent Editor

– Comparison Tool 

• National Palm Print Services

– Currently 5 Million Subjects and growing 

– Potentially leading to 30% more identifications
FBI Latent Services

References

• ULW Software Download

– www.fbibiospecs.org

• ULW Information

– ulw@leo.gov

• Latent Support Services

– latentsupport@leo.gov

• FBI Latent Hit of the Year

– fbilatenthit@leo.gov 
FBI Latent Services

Questions?

JEFF CARLYLE

Forensic Systems Program Manager

FBI Laboratory Division

Latent Print Support Unit

Jeffrey.Carlyle @ ic.fbi.gov

202-497-6135
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4563

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign the face of $20 Federal 

reserve notes so as to include a likeness of President Ronald Wilson 

Reagan, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2004

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of 

Florida, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. PENCE, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. 

FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. KING of Iowa, 

Mr. WALSH, and Mr. SOUDER) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign the 

face of $20 Federal reserve notes so as to include a 

likeness of President Ronald Wilson Reagan, and for 

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘President Ronald 

5 Reagan $20 Bill Act ’’. 
2

•HR 4563 IH 

1 SEC. 2. LIKENESS OF PRESIDENT REAGAN REQUIRED TO 

2 BE INCLUDED ON THE FACE OF $20 FEDERAL 

3 RESERVE NOTES. 

4 The 8th undesignated paragraph of section 16 of the 

5 Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 418) is amended by add6 ing at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘The face of 

7 $20 Federal reserve notes printed after December 31, 

8 2004, shall bear the likeness of President Ronald Wilson 

9 Reagan’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

As Independent Public Accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated February 1, 2000, appearing on page 58 of the
1999 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in the Form 10-K,
into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos.
333-67067, 33-60406, 33-57167, 33-39466, 333-86299, 333-34609, 333-29657,
333-14869, 033-59235, and 033-59237) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-66233,
33-45525, 33-50260, 33-45074, 33-52094, 333-19671, 333-91305, 333-94955,
333-30742, 333-29819 and 033-36694). We also consent to the incorporation of
our report dated February 1, 2000, on the Financial Statement Schedule,
appearing on page 19 of the Form 10-K. It should be noted that we have not
audited any financial statements of UtiliCorp United, Inc. subsequent to
December 31, 1999, or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date
of our reports.

/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
March 24, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Patrick Freeman, Chief Executive Officer of Cordia Corporation (the
"Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the period March 31, 2004 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


                                         By: Patrick Freeman /s/
                                            --------------------------------
                                             Patrick Freeman
                                             Chief Executive Officer

May 15, 2004



--------------
*    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
     been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia
     Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its
     staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1



                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, on behalf of Aviall, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby constitutes and appoints Jeffrey J.
Murphy, Jacqueline K. Collier, James E. O'Bannon and Heather J. Haase and each
of them, the true and lawful attorney or attorneys-in-fact, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for the Company, to sign on behalf of the
Company and on behalf of the undersigned in his or her capacity as an officer
and/or a director of the Company, the Company's S-8 for the Aviall, Inc.
Directors Stock Plan, and to sign any or all amendments thereto, and to file the
same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, to
or with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, granting unto said
attorney or attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the others, full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises in order to effectuate the same
as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney or
attorneys-in-fact, or any of them or their substitute or substitutes, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
effective as of July 10, 1998.




 /s/ ROBERT G. LAMBERT        /s/ HENRY A. MCKINNELL      /s/ DONALD R. MUZYKA
--------------------------    ----------------------      --------------------
     Robert G. Lambert            Henry A. McKinnell          Donald R. Muzyka


 /s/ RICHARD J. SCHNIEDERS    /s/ BRUCE N. WHITMAN
--------------------------    --------------------
     Richard J. Schnieders        Bruce N. Whitman
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
March 27, 2007

| | /s/JAMES H. MOOREJames H. Moore
Chief Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mines Management, Inc. and will be retained by Mines Management, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,152
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  186,913
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,340
<INVENTORY>                                     14,956
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               227,559
<PP&E>                                       2,035,091
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,185,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,294,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          200,951
<BONDS>                                        509,523
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       250,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     125,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,294,444
<SALES>                                        160,315
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               160,315
<CGS>                                           70,821
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,533
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,078
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,857
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,221
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,221
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>