72168 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / Notices 

9See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 10See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full discussion 

of this practice. 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 79392 

(December 30, 2013). 

entries covered by this review.9 The 

Department intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this review. Where either a respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis, or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

For any individually examined 

respondent and its importer(s) where 

neither of those situations is the case, in 

the final results of this review we will 

calculate an importer-specific per-unit 

assessment rate by dividing the total 

dumping margins for reviewed sales to 

the importer by the total sales quantity 

associated with those sales. 

On October 24, 2011, the Department 

announced a refinement to its 

assessment practice in NME 

antidumping duty cases.10 Pursuant to 

this refinement in practice, for 

merchandise that was not reported in 

the U.S. sales databases submitted by an 

exporter individually examined during 

this review, but that entered under the 

case number of that exporter (i.e., at the 

individually-examined exporter’s cash 

deposit rate), the Department will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, 

pursuant to this refinement, if the 

Department determines that an exporter 

under review had no shipments of the 

subject merchandise, any suspended 

entries that entered under that 

exporter’s case number will be 

liquidated at the PRC-wide rate. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for shipments of 

the subject merchandise from the PRC 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by 

sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

the exporters listed above, the cash 

deposit rate will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

review (except, if the rate is zero or de 

minimis, then the cash deposit rate will 

be zero for that exporter); (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed PRC 

and non-PRC exporters not listed above 

that have separate rates, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) for all PRC exporters of 

subject merchandise which have not 

been found to be entitled to a separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate for the PRC-wide entity, 76.72 

percent; and (4) for all non-PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the PRC exporter that 

supplied that non-PRC exporter. These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213. 

Dated: November 28, 2014. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

5. Selection of Respondents 

6. Non-Market Economy Country 

7. Separate Rate 

8. Surrogate Country 

9. Date of Sale 

10. Fair Value Comparisons 

11. U.S. Price 

12. Normal Value 

[FR Doc. 2014–28579 Filed 12–4–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–809] 

Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe 

From the Republic of Korea: 

Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on circular 

welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from 

the Republic of Korea (Korea).1 The 

period of review (POR) is November 1, 

2012, through October 31, 2013. This 

review covers eight producers or 

exporters of the subject merchandise, 

Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel), Hyundai 

HYSCO (HYSCO), Dongbu Steel Co., 

Ltd., SeAH Steel Corporation, A-JU 

Besteel Co., Ltd., Kumkang Industrial 

Co., Ltd., Nexteel Co., Ltd., and Union 

Steel Co., Ltd. We preliminarily find 

that Husteel and HYSCO have made 

sales of the subject merchandise at 

prices below normal value. We are 

rescinding this review for the remaining 

six producers or exporters. Interested 

parties are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 5, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jennifer Meek or Joseph Shuler, AD/

CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–2778 or (202) 482– 

1293, respectively. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is circular welded non-alloy steel pipe 

and tube. The product is currently 

classifiable under the following 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) numbers: 

7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 

7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 

7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and 

7306.30.5090. Although the HTSUS 

numbers are provided for convenience 

and customs purposes, the written 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / Notices 72169 

2For a full description of the scope of the order, 

see the Memorandum from Gary Taverman, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary 

for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Decision 

Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Circular 

Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of 

Korea: 2012–2013’’ (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum), dated concurrently with these 

results and hereby adopted by this notice. 

3See Letter from Wheatland Tube Company 

(Wheatland) to the Department, ‘‘Circular Welded 

Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Republic of Korea/

Partial Withdrawal of Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated March 31, 2014 and Letter from 

United States Steel Corporation (U.S. Steel) to the 

Department, ‘‘Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel 

Pipe from Korea,’’ dated March 31, 2014. 

4On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (IA ACCESS) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

5See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

6See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

7See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). 

8See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

9See 19 CFR 351.303(f). 

10See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

11See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 

(February 14, 2012). 

product description remains 

dispositive.2

Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we 

are rescinding this administrative 

review with respect to the following 

parties because the review requests were 

timely withdrawn: Dongbu Steel Co., 

Ltd., SeAH Steel Corporation, A-JU 

Besteel Co., Ltd., Kumkang Industrial 

Co., Ltd., Nexteel Co., Ltd., and Union 

Steel Co., Ltd.3

Methodology 

The Department has conducted this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). Constructed export 

price is calculated in accordance with 

section 772 of the Act. Normal value is 

calculated in accordance with section 

773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS).4

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov, and is 

available to all parties in the Central 

Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly at http://trade.gov/ 

enforcement. The signed Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum and the 

electronic versions of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Preliminary Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, we 

preliminarily determine that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for the respondents for the 

period November 1, 2012, through 

October 31, 2013. 

Producer or exporter 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Husteel Co., Ltd ............ 1.15 

Hyundai HYSCO ........... 2.02 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

The Department intends to disclose to 

interested parties the calculations 

performed in connection with these 

preliminary results within five days of 

the date of publication of this notice.5

Interested parties may submit case briefs 

no later than 30 days after the date of 

publication of the preliminary results.6

Rebuttal briefs, limited to the issues 

raised in the case briefs, may be filed no 

later than five days after the submission 

of case briefs.7 Parties who submit case 

briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of authorities.8

All case and rebuttal briefs must be filed 

electronically using ACCESS, and must 

also be served on interested parties.9 An 

electronically filed document must be 

received successfully in its entirety by 

the Department’s electronic records 

system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern 

Standard Time on the date that the 

document is due. Executive summaries 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes. 

Interested parties who wish to request 

a hearing, or to participate if one is 

requested, must submit a written 

request to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, using 

Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS 

system within 30 days of publication of 

this notice.10 Hearing requests should 

contain the party’s name, address, and 

telephone number, the number of 

participants, and a list of the issues to 

be discussed. If a request for a hearing 

is made, we will inform parties of the 

scheduled date for the hearing which 

will be held at the U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at 

a time and location to be determined. 

Parties should confirm by telephone the 

date, time, and location of the hearing. 

Unless the deadline is extended 

pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), the 

Department intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of our analysis of 

the issues raised by the parties in their 

case and rebuttal briefs, within 120 days 

after the publication of these 

preliminary results, pursuant to section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(1). 

Assessment Rates 

For Husteel and HYSCO, upon 

issuance of the final results, the 

Department shall determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review. Both Husteel and HYSCO 

reported the name of the importer of 

record and the entered value for all of 

their sales to the United States during 

the POR. If Husteel and HYSCO’s 

weighted-average dumping margins are 

not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 

0.50 percent) in the final results of this 

review, we will calculate importerspecific assessment rates on the basis of 

the ratio of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for each importer’s examined 

sales and the total entered value of those 

sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1). 

We will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review when the 

importer-specific assessment rate 

calculated in the final results of this 

review is not zero or de minimis. Where 

either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis,11 or an importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. This clarification will 

apply to entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by Husteel 

and HYSCO for which they did not 

know its merchandise was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
72170 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / Notices 

12See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: 

Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from 

Brazil, the Republic of Korea (Korea), Mexico, and 

Venezuela, and Amendment to Final Determination 

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Circular 

Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Korea, 57 FR 

49453 (November 2, 1992). 

1See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Antidumping 

Duty New Shipper Review; 2013–2014, 79 FR 59476 

(October 2, 2014) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). 

2 Id. 

3See letter from BASACO entitled ‘‘Withdrawal 

of Request for New Shipper Review: Certain Frozen 

Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Review Period—8/1/13–7/31/14,’’ dated November 

4, 2014. 

4See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 

58729, 58731 (Sept. 30, 2014). 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction. For a full discussion of this 

clarification, see Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

For Husteel and HYSCO, we intend to 

issue instructions to CBP 15 days after 

publication of the final results of this 

review. 

For the companies for which the 

review has been rescinded, antidumping 

duties shall be assessed at rates equal to 

the rates for the cash deposit of 

estimated antidumping duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of this notice. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements for estimated antidumping 

duties will be effective upon publication 

of the notice of final results of 

administrative review for all shipments 

of CWP from Korea entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication as provided by section 

751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit 

rate for HYSCO and Husteel will be 

equal to the weighted-average dumping 

margins established in the final results 

of this administrative review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by producers or 

exporters not covered in this review but 

covered in a prior completed segment of 

the proceeding, the cash deposit rate 

will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most 

recent period; (3) if the exporter is not 

a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original investigation but 

the producer has been covered in a prior 

complete segment of this proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recent period 

for the producer of the merchandise; (4) 

the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 4.80 percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate 

established in the order.12 These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder and, with respect to 

companies which we rescind in part as 

a final reminder, to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

The Department is issuing and 

publishing these results in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act. 

Dated: November 28, 2014. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of Order 

IV. Rescission of Review In Part 

V. Discussion of the Methodology 

1. Comparison to Normal Value 

2. Product Comparisons 

3. Treatment of Grade as a Physical 

Characteristic 

4. Level of Trade/Constructed Export Price 

Offset 

5. Constructed Export Price 

6. Normal Value 

7. Currency Conversion 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2014–28580 Filed 12–4–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–801] 

Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review; 2013–2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to a request from 

BASA Joint Stock Company 

(‘‘BASACO’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Department’’) initiated a 

new shipper review of the antidumping 

duty order on certain frozen fish fillets 

from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam 

(‘‘Vietnam’’) covering the period August 

1, 2013, through July 31, 2014.1 On 

November 4, 2014, BASACO timely 

withdrew its request for a new shipper 

review. Accordingly, the Department is 

rescinding the new shipper review with 

respect to BASACO. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 5, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alexander Montoro, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office V, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0238. 

Rescission of New Shipper Review 

On September 24, 2014, the 

Department initiated a new shipper 

review of BASACO.2 On November 4, 

2014, BASACO withdrew its new 

shipper review request.3 19 CFR 

351.214(f)(1) provides that the 

Department may rescind a new shipper 

review if the party that requested the 

review withdraws its request for review 

within 60 days of the date of publication 

of the notice of initiation of the 

requested review in the Federal 

Register. Because BASACO timely 

withdrew its request for a new shipper 

review (i.e., 33 days after the date of 

publication of the notice of initiation of 

the requested review), the Department is 

rescinding the new shipper review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen fish fillets from Vietnam with 

respect to BASACO. Consequently, 

BASACO will remain part of the 

Vietnam-wide entity. 

Assessment 

Because BASACO remains part of the 

Vietnam-wide entity, it remains under 

review in the ongoing administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order of 

certain frozen fish fillets from Vietnam 

covering the period August 1, 2013, to 

July 31, 2014.4 Therefore, the 

Department will not order liquidation of 

entries for BASACO. The Department 

intends to issue liquidation instructions 

for the Vietnam-wide entity, which will 

cover any entries by BASACO, 15 days 

after publication of the final results of 

the administrative review covering the 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES