71384 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 231 / Tuesday, December 2, 2014 / Notices 

2See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web 

site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. 

3 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties 

should specify that they are requesting a review of 

entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to 

the extent possible, include the names of such 

exporters in their request. 

4See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

1See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from 

India: Initiation and Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 

79 FR 61290 (October 10, 2014) (Initiation and 

Preliminary Results). 

explanation of the attempts it made to 

locate the producer or exporter at the 

same time it files its request for review, 

in order for the Secretary to determine 

if the interested party’s attempts were 

reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(3)(ii). 

As explained in Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and NonMarket Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 

(October 24, 2011) the Department 

clarified its practice with respect to the 

collection of final antidumping duties 

on imports of merchandise where 

intermediate firms are involved. The 

public should be aware of this 

clarification in determining whether to 

request an administrative review of 

merchandise subject to antidumping 

findings and orders.2

Further, as explained in Antidumping 

Proceedings: Announcement of Change 

in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings and Conditional Review of 

the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 

65963 (November 4, 2013), the 

Department clarified its practice with 

regard to the conditional review of the 

non-market economy (NME) entity in 

administrative reviews of antidumping 

duty orders. The Department will no 

longer consider the NME entity as an 

exporter conditionally subject to 

administrative reviews. Accordingly, 

the NME entity will not be under review 

unless the Department specifically 

receives a request for, or self-initiates, a 

review of the NME entity.3 In 

administrative reviews of antidumping 

duty orders on merchandise from NME 

countries where a review of the NME 

entity has not been initiated, but where 

an individual exporter for which a 

review was initiated does not qualify for 

a separate rate, the Department will 

issue a final decision indicating that the 

company in question is part of the NME 

entity. However, in that situation, 

because no review of the NME entity 

was conducted, the NME entity’s entries 

were not subject to the review and the 

rate for the NME entity is not subject to 

change as a result of that review 

(although the rate for the individual 

exporter may change as a function of the 

finding that the exporter is part of the 

NME entity). 

Following initiation of an 

antidumping administrative review 

when there is no review requested of the 

NME entity, the Department will 

instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all 

exporters not named in the initiation 

notice, including those that were 

suspended at the NME entity rate. 

All requests must be filed 

electronically in Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (‘‘IA 

ACCESS’’) on the IA ACCESS Web site 

at http://iaaccess.trade.gov.4 Further, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), 

a copy of each request must be served 

on the petitioner and each exporter or 

producer specified in the request. 

The Department will publish in the 

Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation 

of Administrative Review of 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation’’ for requests received by 

the last day of December 2014. If the 

Department does not receive, by the last 

day of December 2014, a request for 

review of entries covered by an order, 

finding, or suspended investigation 

listed in this notice and for the period 

identified above, the Department will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping or 

countervailing duties on those entries at 

a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or 

bond for) estimated antidumping or 

countervailing duties required on those 

entries at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption and to continue to collect 

the cash deposit previously ordered. 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the period of review. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: November 19, 2014. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28413 Filed 12–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–840] 

Notice of Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Changed Circumstances Review: 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From India 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On October 10, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated a changed 

circumstances review and published a 

notice of preliminary results of changed 

circumstances review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp (shrimp) from 

India.1 In that notice, we preliminarily 

determined that Premier Marine 

Products Private Limited (PPL) is the 

successor-in-interest to Premier Marine 

Products (PMP) for purposes of 

determining antidumping duty cash 

deposits and liabilities. No interested 

party submitted comments on, or 

requested a public hearing to discuss, 

the Initiation and Preliminary Results. 

For these final results, the Department 

continues to find that PPL is the 

successor-in-interest to PMP. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 2, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Blaine Wiltse or Stephen Banea, AD/

CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–6345 or (202) 482– 

0656, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 22, 2014, PPL requested 

that the Department conduct an 

expedited changed circumstances 

review under 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(iii) 

to confirm that PPL is the successor-ininterest to PMP for purposes of 

determining antidumping duty cash 

deposits and liabilities. 

On October 10, 2014, the Department 

initiated this changed circumstances 

review and published the notice of 

preliminary results, determining that 

PPL is the successor-in-interest to PMP. 

See Initiation and Preliminary Results, 

79 FR at 61290. In the Initiation and 

Preliminary Results, we provided all 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 231 / Tuesday, December 2, 2014 / Notices 71385 

2For a complete description of the scope of the 

order, see Initiation and Preliminary Results. 

3See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From 

India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 51309 

(August 28, 2014). 

4 Id. 

1See Frontseating Service Valves From the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Review; 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2012– 

2013, 79 FR 30081 (May 27, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary 

Results’’). 

2 Id. 

3See letter from Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service 

Valves from the People’s Republic of China; A–570– 

933; Rebuttal, Clarification or Correction of Factual 

Information by Zhejiang Sanhua Co., Ltd.,’’ dated 

June 2, 2014. 

4See letter from Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service 

Valves from the People’s Republic of China; A–570– 

933; Request for a Hearing by Zhejiang Sanhua Co., 

Ltd.,’’ dated June 25, 2014. 

5See letter from Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service 

Valves from the People’s Republic of China; A–570– 

933; Case Brief by Zhejiang Sanhua Co., Ltd.,’’ 

dated June 26, 2014. 

6See letter to Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service 

Valves from the People’s Republic of China: 

Rejection of Zhejiang Sanhua Co., Ltd. (‘‘Sanhua’’)’s 

Submissions of June 2, 2014, and June 26, 2014,’’ 

dated October 14, 2014. 

7See Memorandum to the File, ‘‘2012–2013 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Frontseating Service Valves from the 

People’s Republic of China: Placing Additional 

Surrogate Value Information on the Record After 

the Preliminary Results,’’ dated October 14, 2014. 

8See letter from Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service 

Valves from the People’s Republic of China; A–570– 

933; Case Brief of Zhejiang Sanhua Co., Ltd.,’’ dated 

October 25, 2014. 

9See letter from Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service 

Valves from the People’s Republic of China; A–570– 

933; Withdrawal of Hearing Request,’’ dated 

October 28, 2014. 

10See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, 

‘‘Frontseating Service Valves from the People’s 

Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated August 13, 2014. 

interested parties with an opportunity to 

comment or request a public hearing 

regarding our preliminary finding that 

PPL is the successor-in-interest to PMP. 

We received no comments or requests 

for a public hearing from interested 

parties within the time period set forth 

in the Initiation and Preliminary 

Results. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is certain frozen warmwater shrimp.2

The product is currently classified 

under the following Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

item numbers: 0306.17.0003, 

0306.17.0006, 0306.17.0009, 

0306.17.0012, 0306.17.0015, 

0306.17.0018, 0306.17.0021, 

0306.17.0024, 0306.17.0027, 

0306.17.0040, 1605.21.1030, and 

1605.29.1010. Although the HTSUS 

numbers are provided for convenience 

and customs purposes, the written 

product description remains dispositive. 

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review 

For the reasons stated in the Initiation 

and Preliminary Results, and because 

we received no comments from 

interested parties to the contrary, the 

Department continues to find that PPL 

is the successor-in-interest to PMP. As 

a result of this determination, we find 

that PPL should receive the cash deposit 

rate previously assigned to PMP, as a 

part of the Liberty Group of companies, 

in the most recently completed review 

of the antidumping duty order on 

shrimp from India.3 Consequently, the 

Department will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection to suspend 

liquidation of all shipments of subject 

merchandise produced and/or exported 

by PPL and entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the publication date of this notice in the 

Federal Register at 2.49 percent, which 

is the current antidumping duty cash 

deposit rate for PMP, as a part of the 

Liberty Group.4 This cash deposit 

requirement shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

We are issuing this determination and 

publishing these final results and notice 

in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) 

and 777(i)(1) and (2) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.216 

and 351.221(c)(3). 

Dated: November 21, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28417 Filed 12–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–933] 

Frontseating Service Valves From the 

People’s Republic of China; Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On May 27, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published the preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty on frontseating 

service valves from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 The period 

of review (‘‘POR’’) is April 1, 2012, 

through March 31, 2013. The review 

covers two exporters of subject 

merchandise, Zhejiang DunAn Hetian 

Metal Co., Ltd. (‘‘DunAn’’) and Zhejiang 

Sanhua Co., Ltd. (‘‘Sanhua’’). The 

Department continues to find that 

DunAn did not have reviewable entries 

during the POR. Additionally, we find 

that Sanhua made no sales in the United 

States at prices below normal value 

(‘‘NV’’). Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we made changes to 

our margin calculations for Sanhua. The 

final weighted-average dumping margin 

for this review is listed below in the 

section entitled ‘‘Final Results of the 

Review.’’ 

DATES: Effective Date: December 2, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Laurel LaCivita, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4243. 

Background 

On May 27, 2014, the Department 

published the preliminary results of the 

subject administrative review of the 

order.2 At that time, we invited 

interested parties to comment on our 

preliminary results. 

Subsequent to the Preliminary 

Results, the following events occurred. 

On June 2, 2014, Sanhua provided 

comments on new factual information 

contained in the Preliminary Results.3

On June 25, 2014, Sanhua requested a 

hearing.4 On June 26, 2014, Sanhua 

filed a case brief.5

On October 14, 2014, we rejected 

Sanhua’s post-preliminary submissions 

referenced above.6 On the same date, 

the Department placed additional 

Bulgarian surrogate value (‘‘SV’’) data 

on the record, and set the briefing and 

hearing schedule for the case.7 On 

October 25, 2014, Sanhua filed its case 

brief.8 Sanhua was the only party to file 

a case or rebuttal brief in this segment 

of the proceeding. Sanhua withdrew its 

hearing request on October 28, 2014.9

On August 13, 2014, we extended the 

deadline for completing the final results 

until November 24, 2014, in accordance 

with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’).10

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

order is frontseating service valves, 

assembled or unassembled, complete or 

incomplete, and certain parts thereof. 

Frontseating service valves are classified 

under subheading 8481.80.1095, and 

also have been classified under 

subheading 8415.90.80.85, of the 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES