alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### T. L. Taylor *v.*Thos. S. Ellison.

■Appeal — Reversal.

The judgment was held to be against the decided preponderance of the evidence, and, on that account, should be reversed by the Court of Appeals.

APPEAL PROM CUMBERLAND CIRCUIT COURT.

October 18, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The evidence without conflict establishes these facts: That Ellison sued R. C. Taylor twice, and in each action garnisheed appellant; and that the $165, to which R. C. Taylor was entitled *216from his father’s estate, was paid to Ellison by appellant upon one of these garnishments. Appellant insists that it was paid on this suit, and so states in his response to the rule against him. Appellee, in testifying, admits that it was paid to him by appellant, but says that it was paid in the first suit. Now, it is immaterial which of the parties be correct; appellant ought not in any event be compelled to pay this money the second time, as he is required to do by the judgment of the circuit court. By holding appellant strictly to the admission made in his response that he had this money in his hands', when summoned as a garnishee in this action, and rendering judgment against him upon such admissions, the court in effect determined that appellee’s statements that he had received this identical money in the first action were not true.

*Winfrey & Winfrey, for appellant.*

*W. H. Botts, for appellee.*

The opinion of the court expressed in the judgment that this ■money had never been paid to Ellison by appellant is in direct conflict with the sworn statements of both the litigants. It is manifest that appellant was mistaken as to having his money in his hands when garnisheed in his. action, or else in having been paid under an attachment in a previous action. It does not matter which of them was so mistaken; it is certain that the amount had once been paid to. appellee before the rendition of the judgment complained of.

The only ground upon which the judgment can possibly be sustained is that appellant, after the first suit, received from a deceased sister’s estate $400, to which R. C. Taylor was entitled. But he states that this amount was fully paid over to said R. C. Taylor before he was garnisheed in this action, and this statement is uncontradicted.

It seems to this court that the judgment is against the decided preponderance of the evidence. It is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4668 Referred in House (RFH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4668

 To designate the third floor of the Ellis Island Immigration Museum, 
located on Ellis Island in New York Harbor, as the ``Bob Hope Memorial 
                               Library''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2004

Mr. Engel (for himself and Mr. Gallegly) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                              July 8, 2004

                Rereferred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the third floor of the Ellis Island Immigration Museum, 
located on Ellis Island in New York Harbor, as the ``Bob Hope Memorial 
                               Library''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The third floor of the Ellis Island Immigration Museum, located on 
Ellis Island in New York Harbor, shall be known and designated as the 
``Bob Hope Memorial Library''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the third floor of the Ellis Island 
Immigration Museum referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``Bob Hope Memorial Library''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          31,224
<SECURITIES>                                   189,761
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,126
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,721)
<INVENTORY>                                     12,939
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               292,698
<PP&E>                                          15,965
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,099)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 321,417
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,540
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           650
<OTHER-SE>                                     270,227
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   321,417
<SALES>                                         47,462
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               157,716
<CGS>                                           47,803
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,777
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,090
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,341
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,749
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,749
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 4.14


 


Employment agreement and retention award – Mr Gavin R
Slater (as Group General Manager, Office of the Chief Executive)


 


The employment
agreement of Mr Gavin R Slater is incorporated by reference to National
Australia Bank Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Commission on January 20,
2005.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4275

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 

10-percent individual income tax rate bracket. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2004

Mr. SESSIONS (for himself, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. CRANE, Mr. 

KINGSTON, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. COX, Mr. PICKERING, 

Mr. BURR, Mr. BROWN of South Carolina, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. BAKER, Mr. 

BRADY of Texas, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. REHBERG, Mr. 

OTTER, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. AKIN, Mr. 

SMITH of New Jersey, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. SWEENEY, 

Mr. MURPHY, Mr. KIRK, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. RYUN of Kansas, Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, Mr. JENKINS, Mr. HAYES, Mr. FEENEY, Mr. 

ROGERS of Michigan, Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Mr. 

RAMSTAD, Mr. SCHROCK, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. VITTER, Mr. DREIER, Mr. 

GIBBONS, Mr. CHOCOLA, Mrs. BIGGERT, Mr. WICKER, Mr. BURGESS, 

Mr. SIMMONS, Mr. TIBERI, Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, Mr. GARRETT of 

New Jersey, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, and Mr. CANTOR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

extend the 10-percent individual income tax rate bracket.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4275 IH 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF 10-PERCENT INDIVIDUAL IN2 COME TAX RATE BRACKET. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 1(i)(1)(B) of 

4 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to the initial 

5 bracket amount) is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(i) $14,000 in the case of subsection 

7 (a),’’. 

8 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT BEGINNING IN 2004.—

9 Section 1(i)(1)(C) of such Code (relating to inflation ad10 justment) is amended to read as follows: 

11 ‘‘(C) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—In pre12 scribing the tables under subsection (f) which 

13 apply with respect to taxable years beginning in 

14 calendar years after 2003—

15 ‘‘(i) the cost-of-living adjustment used 

16 in making adjustments to the initial brack17 et amount shall be determined under sub18 section (f)(3) by substituting ‘2002’ for 

19 ‘1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof, and 

20 ‘‘(ii) such adjustment shall not apply 

21 to the amount referred to in subparagraph 

22 (B)(iii). 

23 If any amount after adjustment under the pre24 ceding sentence is not a multiple of $50, such 

25 amount shall be rounded to the next lowest 

26 multiple of $50.’’. 
3

•HR 4275 IH 

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2003. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SUNSET. 

5 Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Rec6 onciliation Act of 2001 shall not apply to—

7 (1) paragraph (1) of section 1(i) of the In8 ternal Revenue Code of 1986, and 

9 (2) the amendments made by paragraphs 

10 (1) and (7) of section 101(c) of such Act.

Æ
10444.

#### Slaton *et al. v.*Hinman.

Broyles, P. J.

1. Where in a suit upon an account a bill of particulars is not attached, and a demand therefor is made by the defendant, and subsequently, by amendment allowed, a bill of particulars is set out, this amendment need not be served upon the defendant; and the plaintiff does not lose a term of the court because the bill of particulars was not attached in the first instance to the account sued on. Section 6269 of the Civil Code has been superseded by section 5628 thereof. *Moore*v. *Hendrix,*144 *Ga.*646 (2) (87 S. E. 915) ; *Rea*v. *McGahee,*12 *Ga. App.*326 (77 S. E. 204).

2. It does not affirmatively appear from the petition for certiorari and the answer thereto that the original judgment in favor of the plaintiff was not rendered at the proper term of the court.

3. “An affidavit of illegality can not be used as a substitute for certiorari or other appellate procedure. If the affiant was regularly served with process or voluntarily appeared and pleaded in the main suit, he *65can not by Ms affidavit of illegality assail the judgment because of mere errors of law which took place on the trial.” *Arnold-Forrest Horse*& *Mule Co.*v. *Fleming,*9 *Ga. App.*483 (71 S. E. 766).

Decided July 3, 1919.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Ellis. January 24,1919.

IP. *A. James,*for plaintiffs in error.

*E.*IP. *B elf or,*contra.

4. Under the above rulings the trial judge did not err in dismissing the affidavit of illegality.

*5.*The bill of exceptions contains no assignment of error upon the judgment of the superior court dismissing the traverse to the answer to the petition for certiorari. That judgment, accordingly, will be conclusively presumed to be correct.

6. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloo&worth, J., concurs. Stephens, J., concurs specially.*

Stephens, J.

In my opinion a decision of the matters embraced in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the decision in this ease is not necessary to a proper determination of the case. I concur in the judgment of affirmance upon the grounds stated in the other paragraphs.
No. 87-1276.

#### H-CHH Associates et al., dba Plaza Pasadena *v.*Citizens for Representative Government, dba Pasadena Citizens for Representative Government, et al.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Motions of Pacific Legal Foundation and International Council of Shopping Centers, Inc., et al. for leave to file briefs as *amici curiae*granted. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 2-91432, 2-72124, 2-85698, 2-97280, 33-37319,
33-37323, 33-59005, 33-10801, 33-11790, 333-79227, 333-90127, and 333-30918), on
Form S-3 (File Nos. 2-84252, 33-9706, 33-22196, 33-47213, and 333-23025), on
Form S-3/A (File No. 333-80781) and on Form S-4 (File No. 33-58117) of Millipore
Corporation of our report dated January 19, 2000 relating to the financial
statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.


                                        /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers


Boston,  Massachusetts
March 10 , 2000
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Elizabeth H. Davila, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of VISX, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of VISX, Incorporated.

                                       /s/ Elizabeth H. Davila
                                       ---------------------------------
                                       Elizabeth H. Davila
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       August 6, 2004

I, Derek A. Bertocci, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of VISX, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of VISX, Incorporated.

                                       /s/ Derek A. Bertocci
                                       ---------------------------------
                                       Derek A. Bertocci
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       August 6, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Siebert Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Muriel F. Siebert, in my capacity as Chair, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report
filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the report.

|                                              |  |                      
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|/s/ Muriel
 F. Siebert                        |  | Date: March
 31, 2008
|                                              |  |                      
|Muriel F.
 Siebert                            | 
|Chair, Chief
 Executive Officer and President | 

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by section 906, has been provided to Siebert Financial Corp. and will be
retained by Siebert Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
United States Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

Minnesota

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, and has demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope

NOTE: Amended 2023-01-31 to update 

Mass II, Mass III scope and add 1 gal 

slicker to Volume Gravimetric I

(Rev.: September 2021)

Mass Echelon I

20 kg to 1 mg

Mass Echelon II

5 kg to 1 mg

2500 lb

1000 lb, 500 lb 

50 lb to 0.001 lb

Mass Echelon III

30 kg to 1 mg

3000 lb to 200 lb

100 lb to 0.001 lb

4 oz to 0.03125 oz

Weight Carts

5000 lb to 2000 lb

Wheel Load Weighers

12 000 lb to 2000 lb

Railroad Test Cars/Carts

110 000 lb to 80 000 lb

10 000 lb to 8000 lb

Volume Gravimetric, I

20 L to 10 mL

100 gal to 0.25 gal

12 fl oz

1 gal slicker

Volume Transfer, II

1500 gal to 5 gal

Volume Transfer, II LPG

200 gal to 25 gal

2022 to 2023

____________________________________

Katrice Lippa, Chief

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

Effective Dates: 2022-02-01 to 2024-02-01
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Everest
Futures Fund, L.P. for the first quarter of 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000837919
<NAME> EVEREST FUTURES FUND L P
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      41,663,841
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,688
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,772,528
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,772,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,290,921
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,481,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,772,528
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           (3,232,325)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  371,673
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,566,153)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,566,153)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,566,153)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (182.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (182.71)
        

</TABLE>
20-F










Exhibit 10.1  



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 




We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements Forms S-8 (Registration Nos.
333-113932, 333-96630, 333-08826, 333-10092, 333-12466, 333-12988 and 333-123410) and Forms F-3 (Registration No.
333-113950 and 333-12698) of our report dated  February 2, 2005, except for Notes 1e, 2s, 8j, 10c, 12d, 12e, 12f,
12g, 13b, 14d and 15d as to which the date is November 29, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended
December 31, 2004.





			Yours Truly,

/s/ KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
A Member of Ernst & Young Global






Tel Aviv, Israel
November 29, 2005
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, James H. Moore, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-K of Mines Management, Inc. (the registrant);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 28, 2006

/s/ James H. Moore

James H. Moore

Chief Financial Officer





46





---





47