alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund III, L.P. (the Registrant) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief
Executive Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS, III                                     
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief Executive
Officer November 12, 2004  
|                                                             
|/S/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS                                   
|Douglas P. Williams Chief Financial
Officer November 12, 2004
Exhibit 10.1  


	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Gina A. Lumia 

  	
  

  
	
  Vice President

  	
   

  
	
  Commercial Banking Division

  	
   

  
	
  518.257.8929

  	
   

  
	
  518.257.8587

  	
   

  
	
  Gina.Lumia@Key.com

  	
   

  



November 23, 2005


Mr. Joseph Gerardi, VP & CFO

AngioDynamics, Inc.

603 Queensbury Avenue

Queensbury, NY 12804


Dear Joe,


I am pleased to inform you that KeyBank National
Association (the “Bank”) has approved the renewal and increase of the following
financing commitment:


Facility:
Revolving Line of Credit:


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Borrower:

  	
   

  	
  AngioDynamics Inc. (“Borrower”) 

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Facility:

  	
   

  	
  $7,500,000.00 Working Capital Revolving Line of
  Credit 

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Purpose:

  	
   

  	
  General Working Capital needs

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Interest Rate:

  	
   

  	
  A variable Interest Rate of 1 month LIBOR plus 175
basis points or  KeyBank National Association Prime. Interest will be
calculated on a 360-day basis. Rate change to occur the first of each month.  

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Fees:

  	
   

  	
  $7,500.00 

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Amortization:

  	
   

  	
  Monthly interest only payments 

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Maturity:

  	
   

  	
  November 30, 2006 

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Collateral:

  	
   

  	
  A first security interest in all Accounts Receivable
  and Inventory 

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Guarantees:

  	
   

  	
  None 

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Clean-up:

  	
   

  	
  Line must be reduced to zero for a minimum of 30
  consecutive days prior to maturity. 

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Financial Reporting:

  	
   

  	
  Annual, unqualified audited financial statements;
annual budget, annual A/R aging to be
received by the Bank within 120 days of Fiscal Year End. Quarterly financial
statements and Covenant Compliance Certificate to be received by the Bank
within 45 days of each quarter end.  

  



Page 1








The terms of this
Commitment, both prior to and after acceptance by the Borrowers, may be waived
or modified only by a written instrument signed by the Bank and shall survive
the execution of these Loans and related Documents.


THIS IS A COMMITMENT BUT
IS NOT INTENDED AS A COMPREHENSIVE STATEMENT OF ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO
WHICH OUR APPROVAL WILL BE SUBJECT TO, BUT RATHER AS A SUMMARY OF CERTAIN
PROVISIONS THAT WILL BE CONTAINED IN THE LOAN DOCUMENTS.


KeyBank appreciates the opportunity
to be of service to you. If you have any questions regarding this document,
please do not hesitate to telephone me. We look forward to the continuance of
our mutually beneficial relationship.


Sincerely,






  Gina A. Lumia
Vice President


Agreed and accepted this 26
day of November, 2005


BORROWER:


	
   

  	
   

  
	
  AngioDynamics Inc.

  
	
  

  
	
  


  	
   

  
	
  Name: Joseph G. Gerardi

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title: Vice President, CFO

  



Page 2
IB 

Union Calendar No. 409 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4508 

[Report No. 108–669] 

To amend the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 to require the 

Secretary to permit continued use and occupancy of certain privately 

owned cabins in the Mineral King Valley in the Sequoia National Park. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2004 

Mr. NUNES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Resources 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2004 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To amend the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 

to require the Secretary to permit continued use and 

occupancy of certain privately owned cabins in the Mineral King Valley in the Sequoia National Park. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4508 RH 

1 SECTION 1. USE OF CABINS IN THE MINERAL KING VALLEY. 

2 Section 314 of the National Parks and Recreation 

3 Act of 1978 (Public Law 95–625; 92 Stat. 3480) is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ‘‘Such 

6 rights of use and occupancy shall be for not more 

7 than twenty-five years or for a term ending at the 

8 death of the owner or his or her spouse, whichever 

9 is later.’’; and 

10 (2) in subsection (d)(2)(B), by inserting ‘‘and 

11 to their heirs, successors, and assigns’’ after ‘‘those 

12 persons who were lessees or permittees of record on 

13 the date of enactment of this Act’’. 

Union Calendar No. 409 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4508 

[Report No. 108–669] 

A BILL 

To amend the National Parks and Recreation Act 

of 1978 to require the Secretary to permit continued use and occupancy of certain privately owned cabins in the Mineral King Valley in the Sequoia National Park. 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2004 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cox Technologies, Inc.
Belmont, North Carolina

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
333-52738)  on Form S-8 of Cox  Technologies,  Inc. of our report  dated July 3,
2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Cox Technologies,  Inc. and
subsidiaries  as of  April  30,  2003 and  2002,  and the  related  consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity (deficit),  and cash flows
for each of the three years in the  three-year  period ended April 30, 2003, and
all related schedules,  which report appears in the April 30, 2003 annual report
on Form 10-K of Cox Technologies, Inc.


/s/ Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.

Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.
Gastonia, North Carolina
July 23, 2003


                                      A-1
August 4, 2023

Dear NIST Measurement Services Customer,

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), U.S. Department of Commerce, is the Federal agency 

responsible for developing, maintaining and disseminating national metrology standards – realizations of the 

International System of Units (SI) - for the basic measurement quantities, and for many derived measurement 

quantities. Measurement results throughout the U.S., and indeed the world, are traceable to NIST's realizations of the 

SI. In turn, NIST establishes the traceability of its own measurement results and the values of its own standards while 

operating in accordance with the NIST Quality System. The NIST Quality System is based on ISO/IEC 17025:2017 

for its measurement and calibration functions. ISO 8000 is used as the relevant standard for functions specific to the 

development and availability of NIST Standard Reference Data. ISO 17034 is used as the relevant standard for 

functions specific to the development and production of Certified Reference Materials, called NIST Standard 

Reference Materials (SRMs). The Quality System for the delivery of measurement services is based on ISO 9001. 

Conformance to these standards for the NIST laboratories and divisions performing and delivering measurement 

services has been verified using an assessment process administered by NIST's Quality Manager as described in the 

quality manual NIST-QM-I.

As the primary agency for U.S. measurement standards, NIST does not employ third-party audits. In general, NIST 

will not sign any affidavits, acknowledgement forms, or other documents that may be required by any domestic or 

foreign entity for policy governing procurement of goods and services. Such documents generally contain provisions 

that conflict with U.S. statutes and/or ask NIST to document how NIST fulfills the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025 

regarding traceability to itself. Additional information about NIST’s Policy on Metrological Traceability is available 

on NIST’s website.

It is intended that this information along with the descriptions of policies, terms and conditions of the NIST’s provision 

of Calibration Services, Standard Reference Data and/or Standard Reference Materials, will serve the goals of your 

inquiry.

Sincerely,

Sally Bruce

NIST Quality Manager

NIST

100 Bureau Drive, Stop 2100

Gaithersburg, MD 20899-2100

email: mailto:sally.bruce@nist.gov
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130223 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130223 

 COA: 262998 

Macomb CC: 03-002549-FC 

GERMIRA LAMAR CARTER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 4, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0920 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 27, 2006 

 Clerk
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4227

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend to 2005 the alternative minimum tax relief available in 2003 and 2004 and to index 

such relief for inflation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2004

Mr. SIMMONS (for himself, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. 

PICKERING, Mr. AKIN, Mr. HAYWORTH, and Mr. BROWN of South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

to 2005 the alternative minimum tax relief available in 

2003 and 2004 and to index such relief for inflation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited at the ‘‘Middle-Class Alter5 native Minimum Tax Relief Act of 2004’’. 
2

•HR 4227 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX RE2 LIEF TO 2005. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraphs (A) and (B) of 

4 section 55(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are 

5 each amended by striking ‘‘and 2004’’ and inserting ‘‘, 

6 2004, and 2005’’. 

7 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Subsection (d) of 

8 section 55 of such Code is amended by inserting after 

9 paragraph (3) the following new paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(4) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any 

12 taxable year beginning in calendar year 2005, 

13 the $58,000 amount contained in paragraph 

14 (1)(A) and the $40,250 amount contained in 

15 paragraph (1)(B) shall each be increased by an 

16 amount equal to—

17 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

18 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de19 termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal20 endar year in which the taxable year be21 gins, determined by substituting ‘2003’ for 

22 ‘1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof. 

23 ‘‘(B) ROUNDING.—Any increase deter24 mined under subparagraph (A) which is not a 

25 multiple of $50 shall be rounded to the next 

26 lowest multiple of $50.’’. 
3

•HR 4227 IH 

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2004.

Æ
GLD
- 400 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 13

- 2295

___________ IN RE: MAURICE THOMAS,

Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States D istrict Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Related to E.D. Pa. Crim. No. 11

- cr - 00618

- 003 )

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

August 22, 2013 Before: FUENTES, FISHER and VANASKIE , Circuit Judges

( Opinion filed : September 9, 2013 )

_________ OPINION

_________ PER CURIAM Maurice Thomas seeks a writ of mandamus to address alleged delays in the adjudication of his criminal proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

. 1 A wri t of mandamus is a drastic remedy available only in extraordinary cases. See In re Diet Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig. , 418 F.3d 372, 378 (3d Cir. 2005). A party seeking mandamus must show that he has “no other adequate means

1 Although he is represented by counsel in the District Court, he has filed his mandamus petition pro se.2

to attain the relief he desires” and that his right to the writ is “clear and indisputable.” Hollingsworth v. Perry , 558 U.S. 183, 190 (2010) (per curiam) (quotation marks omitted).
In October 2012, the District Court denied Thomas ’ counseled mo tion to dismiss the charges against h im based in part on his right to a speedy trial. To the extent Thomas intends to challenge that ruling he may not do so via a petition for a writ of mandamus

. A mandamus petition is not a substitute for an appeal and may not be used to circumvent the fin al judgment rule

. 2 In re Baldwin , 700 F.3d 122, 127 (3d Cir. 2102) ; In re Kensington Int’l Ltd. , 353 F.3d 211, 219 (3d Cir. 2003) . If he is convicted , Thomas may challenge the District Court’s interlocutory rulings by taking an appeal after entry of a
fi nal judgment. See, e.g. , United States v. Graves , — F.3d

— , No. 12

- 2688, 2013 WL
3112703 at *1

– 4 (3d Cir. June 21, 2013) ( reviewing Speedy Trial Act claim on direct appeal) ; United States v. Willaman , 437 F.3d 354, 357

– 59 (3d Cir. 2006) (same)

. According ly, we will deny the petition for a writ of mandamus.

2 A District Court’s denial of a speedy trial motion is not immediately appealable. United St ates v. Culbertson , 598 F.3d 40, 48 (2d Cir. 2010) (“a district court’s order denying dismissal for an a lleged violation of a defendant’ s right to a speedy trial is not reviewable on interlocutory appeal”) (citing United States v. MacDonald , 435 U.S. 850 , 857 (1978)) ; cf. United States v. Kuper , 522 F.3d 302, 303

– 305 (3d Cir. 2008) (holding that an order dismissing an indictment without prejudice pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act is not immediately appealable and may be appealed if defendant is re

- indicted a nd convicted)

.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4536 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment Yellow 175. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2004 

Mr. LANGEVIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment 

Yellow 175. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PIGMENT YELLOW 175. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.32.19 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2002’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2006’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

9 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

10 January 1, 2003. 

Æ
Dear Ms MacFarland,

Kaspersky Security Awareness (https://www.kaspersky.com/enterprisesecurity/security-awareness) is a subdivision of Kaspersky Lab which is responsible for 

development of security awareness training for commercial and not-for-profit 

organisations. We have previously participated in the hearings related to the 

establishment of NIST Cybersecurity Framework.

We share the view expressed in the NIST Privacy Framework RFI, that the topic of 

privacy protection is inextricably linked to the subject cybersecurity awareness, and 

wish to offer our subject-matter expertise as a contribution to the development the NIST 

Privacy Framework.

In particular, we would like to share and discuss with NIST forums, the learning 

methodology, which has been developed by us in response to challenges in the security 

awareness field.

In late 2018 we have launched a new on-line training platform entitled Kaspersky 

Automated Security Awareness Platform (Kaspersky ASAP), which represents a very 

different (from other online training providers) approach to learning.

The key principles underpinning ASAP (in comparison with traditional approaches) are:

ASAP Traditionalonline platforms

Methodology: 

how people 

learn?

“Pattern recognition”: 

employees are capable to 

behave safely even

with completely new threats

“Drills”: specific skills on 

predefined situations

Education 

schedule

Interval learning with constant 

reinforcement, micro-learning 

using different media

Manual learning assignments 

based on best practices

Program 

management

Fully automated. Training 

takes 15 minutes to set up 

and is low-maintenance. 

Simple “as-needed” reporting.

Manual assignment of training 

content, significant set-up and 

maintenance effort

Content/ 

knowledge base 

structure

Risk-based predefined 

learning path; rich expert 

content over 4 levels

Library with recommended 

“reading list”, unconnected 

learning modules

Assessment Simulated phishing/ tests 

checking every particular skill 

(350 skills)

Random simulated phishing/ 

tests
We believe that ASAP offers a number of key advantages to organizations, primarily 

due to ease-of-use and automation. For end users it offers a comprehensive learning 

curriculum based on interval training principles, which enables pattern-recognition and 

sustainable behavior change.

In addition to ASAP-style approach to awareness training (which is aimed at all 

categories of students), we also developed a number of gamified strategy and 

motivation programs for senior and middle management. We have recently published, 

for a European Commission – sponsored project, gamified training, which includes 

significant GDPR content.

In summary, we would like to participate in the NIST Privacy Framework initiative, both 

to share our experience and expertise in the creation of comprehensive training 

solutions in the adjoining field of cybersecurity, as well as to learn from the experience 

of other participants in the field of privacy protection.

Sincerely,

Adam Filler

Kaspersky Security Awareness
EXHIBIT 4.15


 


Employment agreement – Mr Michael J Ullmer (as Chief
Financial Officer)


 


The employment
agreement of Mr Michael J Ullmer is incorporated by reference to National
Australia Bank Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Commission on January 20,
2005.
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4495 

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise 

trade for the vessel W. N. RAGLAND. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 2, 2004 

Ms. ESHOO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a 

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel 

W. N. RAGLAND. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 

4 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Ma5 rine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), section 8 of the Act 

6 of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 

7 12106 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of 

8 Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation 
2 

•HR 4495 IH 

1 with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 

2 coastwise trade for the vessel W. N. RAGLAND (Wash3 ington State registration number WN5506NE). 

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0016

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RILEY JOSEPH LANDWEHR,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 13, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 4 2022

05/04/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0016
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Siebert Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Joseph M. Ramos, Jr., in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1)    the Report filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the report. 

| /s/ Joseph M. Ramos, Jr. |   | Date: April 4, 2005 |
|--------------------------|--------|---------------------|
| Joseph M. Ramos, Jr.     |   |
| Chief Financial Officer  |   |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by section 906, has been provided to Siebert Financial Corp. and will be retained by Siebert Fiancial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----