alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000837472

<NAME>                        Boundless Corporation

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                 776
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       12,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                           825
<INVENTORY>                                          9,890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    26,620
<PP&E>                                              18,005
<DEPRECIATION>                                       6,497
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      45,255
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               16,033
<BONDS>                                             16,174
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                46
<OTHER-SE>                                          12,004
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        45,255
<SALES>                                             56,190
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    56,190
<CGS>                                               46,947
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       46,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       245
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     979
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (10,931)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (10,931)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (10,931)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (2.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (2.41)



</TABLE>
#### Samuel Glasscock, etc., *v.*Commonwealth.

Intoxicating, Liquors — License—Place of Business.

Under a license to keep a tavern, the licensee does not have the right to keep a barroom at ¡his storehouse detached and forty feet • distance from the tavern where a separate business is conducted.

APPEAL FROM BRECKENRIDGE CIRCUIT COURT.

June 3, 1873.

*G. Williams, for appellant.*

*Atty. General, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

The license to- the appellants clearly imports the usual privileges of tavern keepers, which embraced the right to retail liquors at their tavern house and in connection with their business of entertaining guests; but it did not in our opinion, protect them in keeping a separate bar-room at their storehouse, detached and forty yards distant from the tavern, and where a distinct and separate business was conducted.

We therefore concur in the judgment, which is *'affirmed.*
JAMES WATT
a IN

HONEY, |

mmm SHRUNK THE ==

KIBBLE BALANCE
10876.

#### Crawley *v.*The State.

Decided November 4, 1919.

Indictment for manufacture of intoxicating liquor; from Pike superior court—Judge Searcy. August 2, 1919.

*Redding & Lester,*for plaintiff in error.

*E. M. Owens, solicitor-general,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence amply authorized, if it did not demand, the defendant’s conviction; and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial shows cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


          KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned Directors and
Officers of Millipore Corporation (the "Corporation"), do hereby constitute and
appoint C. William Zadel, Kathleen Allen and Jeffrey Rudin and each of them
individually, their true and lawful attorneys and agents to execute on behalf of
the Corporation the Form 10-K Annual Report of the Corporation for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1999, and all such amendments or additional instruments
related thereto which such attorneys and agents may deem to be necessary and
desirable to enable the Corporation to comply with the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any regulations, orders, or
other requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
thereunder in connection with the preparation and filing of said documents,
including specifically, but without limitation of the foregoing, power and
authority to sign the names of each of such Directors and Officers on his
behalf, as such Director or Officer, as indicated below to the said Form 10-K
Annual Report or documents filed or to be filed as a part of or in connection
with such Form 10-K Annual Report; and each of the undersigned hereby ratifies
and confirms all that said attorneys and agents shall do or cause to be done by
virtue thereof.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE                   TITLE                    DATE
---------                   -----                    ----
<S>                        <C>                      <C>


/s/ C. William Zadel        Chairman, President      February 17, 2000
--------------------        Chief Executive Officer
C. William Zadel            and Director




/s/ Robert C. Bishop        Director                 February 17, 2000
--------------------
Robert C. Bishop



_____________________       Director                 February    , 2000
Samuel C. Butler



/s/ Robert E. Caldwell      Director                 February 17, 2000
----------------------
Robert E. Caldwell
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE                   TITLE                    DATE
---------                   -----                    ----
<S>                        <C>                      <C>


/s/ Elaine L. Chao          Director                 February 17, 2000
------------------
Elaine L. Chao



/s/ Maureen A. Hendricks    Director                 February 17, 2000
------------------------
Maureen A. Hendricks



/s/ Mark Hoffman            Director                 February 17, 2000
----------------
Mark Hoffman



/s/ Richard J. Lane         Director                 February 17, 2000
-------------------
Richard J. Lane



/s/ Thomas O. Pyle          Director                 February 17, 2000
------------------
Thomas O. Pyle



/s/ John F. Reno            Director                 February 17, 2000
----------------
John F. Reno
</TABLE>

                                       2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         210,596
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,386
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               410,446
<PP&E>                                         791,622
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,762
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,137,306
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          573,254
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,663
<OTHER-SE>                                     558,389
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,137,306
<SALES>                                            361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   361
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  295,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,047)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (293,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (293,689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (293,689)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-69322, 33-71450, 33-52168, 33-89072, 333-02115,
333-10349, 333-30279, 333-30281, 333-16531, 333-16015, 333-45079, 333-45095, and
333-45083) and in the Prospectuses constituting part of the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-63810, 33-71510, 33-87514, 33-77964, 33-87516,
33-58719, 333-10455, 333-10459, 333-20911, 333-45127, and 333-45067) of
WorldCom, Inc. of our report dated April 9, 1998, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of MCI Communications Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1997, which report appears on page F-24 of this Form 8K/A-3.



/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP 
May 28, 1998 
Washington, D.C.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27933]



[[Page 70265]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8955]


Determination and Certification Regarding Assistance to Fiji

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 24, 2014, the Deputy Secretary of State took the 
following action: ``Pursuant to the authority vested in me as Deputy 
Secretary of State, including by section 7008 of the Department of 
State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 
2014 (Div. K, Pub. L. 113-76), as carried forward by the Continuing 
Appropriations Resolution, 2014 (Pub. L. 113-64), and similar 
provisions in prior year Acts, Executive Order 12163, as amended, and 
State Department Delegation of Authority No. 245-1, I hereby determine 
and certify that, subsequent to the termination of assistance to the 
Government of Fiji after that country's December 2006 military coup, a 
democratically elected government has taken office in Fiji.
    ``This Determination and Certification shall be reported to 
Congress and published in the Federal Register.''

(Signed William J. Burns, Deputy Secretary of State)

    This Determination and Certification has been reported to Congress.

    Dated: October 29, 2014.
J. Paul Reid,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Bureau of East Asian and 
Pacific Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014-27933 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-30-P
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United St ates District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-3840

___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Northern * District of Iowa. Shawn Lee Drinnon, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendant - Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 12, 2006 Filed: June 16, 2006

___________ Before MURPHY, MELLOY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Shawn Lee Drinnon was convicted of conspiracy to distribute less than 50 grams of methamphetamine mixture, in viola tion of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C), and 846. The district court 1 found that Drinnon was personally involved with at least 255.15 grams and sentenced him under a mandatory guidelines regime to 109 months. Drinnon appealed, and we remanded the case for resentencing-2- in accordance with Booker v. United States , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), based on the violation of the Sixth Amendment at sentencing. SeeUnited States v. Drinnon , 139 Fed. Appx. 761 (2005) (Drinnon I). On remand the district court resentenced Drinnon to 109 months, and he appeals, ch allenging the districtcourt's independent determination of the drug quantity invol ved and alleging th at the retroactive application of Booker to his case violates th e ex post facto clause. Drinnon argues that the district court violated the Fifth and Sixth Amendments by substituting its finding of drug quantity for that of the jury verdict and that his sentence is unreasonable. We upheld the c ourt's quantity determination in Drinnon's first appeal, see Drinnon I at 762, and we affirm that determination as the law of the case since sentencing facts do not need to be found by a jury. See United States v. Haack , 403 F.3d 997, 1003 (8th Cir. 2005). Drinnon's se ntence falls within the guideline range and is therefore presumptively reasonable. See United States v. Lincoln , 413 F.3d 716, 717 (8th Cir. 2005). Under all the circumstances we conclude that his sentence was not unreasonable. Drinnon further asserts that sentencing under an advisory guideline scheme in his case violated the ex post facto clause because he had a valid expectation that he would be sentenced under a mandatory regi me. Being sentenced under the advisory guidelines does not "implicate either ex post facto or due process principles", however. See United States v. Jones , 440 F.3d 927, 929 (8th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we affirm the amended judgment of the district court.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER and PRINCIPAL
       FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
          OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Everest Fund, L.P.
(the "Partnership"), for the quarter ended March 31, 2009,
as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Lamoureux, President
of Everest Asset Management, Inc., the general partner of
the Everest Fund, L.P. (the "Fund"), hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Fund.


      By:  /s/ Peter Lamoureux
         ----------------------
      Name: 	Peter Lamoureux
      Title: 	Director, President and
      		Treasurer

      May 15, 2009


		E-3
No. 15,560.

#### Blair *v.*Blair.

Special *Finding.*— Statement *of Fact.*— Exception *to Conclusions of*Law.— *What it Admits.*— In a suit to recover the possession of land with damages for its detention, the court in its special findingof facts, after stating the reasonable rental value of the land for various periods, stated “ that the damages accruing to the plaintiff by being kept out of the possession of said real estate from the date of said last demand to the time of the trial of this suit is the sum of two hundred dollars.”

*Held,*that said final clause of the finding is a finding of fact, and not a conclusion of law.

*Held,*also, that an exception to the conclusions of law is an admission that the facts are fully and correctly found.

From the Carroll Circuit Court.

*195
      *A. L. Kumler*and *T. F. Gaylord,*for appellant.

J. *H. Adams,*for appellee.

McBride, J.

This was a suit to recover the possession of land, with damages for its detention.

The court, by request of the parties, found the facts specially and stated its conclusions of law.

The only error discussed by counsel is, that the court erred in its conclusions of law. The specific error complained of being in its award of damages.

The court made the following finding relative to damages: *“*That the reasonable rental value of said real estate for the farming year and season of 1890 is six hundred dollars; that the reasonable rental value of said real estate for the farming year and season of 1890, after the first day of May, 1890, is the sum of three hundred dollars; that the damages accruing to the plaintiff by being kept out of the possession of said real estate from the date of said last demand to the time of the trial of this suit is the sum of two hundred dollars.” Upon this the court stated as its conclusion of law that the appellee was entitled to recover the sum of two hundred dollars damages.

The appellant insists that the latter clause of the finding is nothing more than a mere conclusion and should be disregarded, and that without it there.is nothing upon which to base the conclusion of law.

We can not agree with the appellant. While possibly open to the objection that it is a general rather than a special finding, it is a finding of a fact and can' not be disregarded. An exception to the conclusions of law is an admission that the facts are fully and correctly found. *Gregory*v. *Van*Voorst, 85 Ind. 108; *Helms*v. *Wagner,*102 Ind. 385; *Bass*v. *Elliott,*105 Ind. 517; *Kurtz*v. *Carr,*105 Ind. 574; *Wynn*v. *Troy,*109 Ind. 250; *Gardner*v. *Case, 111*Ind. 494; *Warren*v. *Sohn,*112 Ind. 213.

An objection that the finding on any issue is general, in*196stead of special, is not raised by an exception to the conclusion of law.

Filed April 19, 1892.

Judgment affirmed.
Non-Partisan Primary Ballot (Boleta No-Partidario Primaria)

Town of Cicero

FOR SUPERVISOR (FULL 4-YEAR TERM)
PARA SUPERVISOR (Término Completo De 4 Anos)

Vote For One

VatePor Une (Joseph Virruso 42>
—_____ - —
FOR ASSESSOR (FULL 4-YEAR TERM)
PARA VALUADOR (Término Completo De 4 Afios)
Vote For O1 Fi
Vote For one (Jose Alanis 52>
——
FOR TRUSTEE (FULL 4-YEAR TERM)
PARA FIDEICOMISARIO (Término Completo De 4 Afios)
Vote For Two (Lorraine Walsh 56>
Vote Por Dos -
(Maria Punzo-Arias 58>

B town of cicoro

TURN PAGE
TO CONTINUE
VOTING

VOLTEE LA
PAGINA
PARA CONTINUAR
VOTANDO

CO

If you spoil your ballot,

ask the judge for a new one.
Si usted dafia su boleta,

pidale una boleta nueva al Juez.


COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS Official Non-Partisan Specimen Ballot
CONDADO DE COOK, ILLINOIS Consolidated Primary Election
Tuesday, February 22, 2005
Boleta No-Partidario Oficial Ausente Ejemplar
Eleccion Consolidada Primaria
Martes, 22 de Febrero, 2005

INSTRUCTIONS
INSTRUCCIONES
+ 3 at dh
; @ 28
Using both hands, Be sure the red pins are Hold the punch
insert ballot card through the holes. straight up and down.
with punch numbers Asegutirese de que los Be sure to press
facing you. broches rojos estén a firmly!
Con ambas manos inserte través de los agujeros. Sujete el puzdn en
la boleta, con los numeros posicién vertical, y
perforados hacia enfrente. presione firmemente.
Turn the page to vote
Voltee la pagina para votar
Ballot 98-1
FOR USE IN:
TOWN OF CICERO

TOWN OF CICERO—REFS (3)
TOWNSHIP OF CICERO Precincts: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20,

21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46,
47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53
(INICIALES DEL JUEZ)
Qi On
DAVID ORR
COUNTY CLERK sol
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS



Non-Partisan Primary Ballot (Boleta No-Partidario Primaria)
Town of Cicero

FOR PRESIDENT (FULL 4-YEAR TERM)
PARA PRESIDENTE (Término Completo De 4 Afos)

isis Oise (Larry Dominick 4>
Wore Porno (Ramiro Gonzalez 6>

——$——__— _ — — —— —
FOR CLERK (FULL 4-YEAR TERM)

PARA ARCHIVERO (Término Completo De 4 Afos)

Vote For One

Vo Prune, (Marylin Colpo 14>

_ — ——_—
FOR COLLECTOR (FULL 4-YEAR TERM)
PARA COBRADOR (Término Completo De 4 Afios)

eoerUce: (Fran Reitz 24>

Ay town ot cicero

TURN PAGE
TO CONTINUE
VOTING

VOLTEE LA
PAGINA
PARA CONTINUAR
VOTANDO

—_—

If you spoil your ballot,

ask the judge for a new one.
Si usted dafia su boleta,

pidale una boleta nueva al Juez.


Non-Partisan Primary Ballot (Boleta No-Partidario Primaria)
Town of Cicero

FOR PRESIDENT (FULL 4-YEAR TERM)
PARA PRESIDENTE (Término Completo De 4 Anos)

(Larry Dominick 45>

Vote For One
Vote Por Uno

(Ramiro Gonzalez 6>

FOR CLERK (FULL 4-YEAR TERM)
PARA ARCHIVERO (Término Completo De 4 Aftos)
Vote For One

VoPorune, (Marylin Colpo 14>

-
FOR COLLECTOR (FULL 4-YEAR TERM)
PARA COBRADOR (Término Completo De 4 Afios)

Vote For One (Fran Reitz 24>

A to«n of cicero

TURN PAGE
TO CONTINUE
VOTING

VOLTEE LA
PAGINA
PARA CONTINUAR
VOTANDO

el

If you spoil your ballot,

ask the judge for a new one.
Si usted dafia su boleta,

pidale una boleta nueva al Juez.
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1




FORM OF

AMENDMENT TO [AMENDED AND RESTATED]

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




          This Amendment (the “Amendment”) is made as of November ___, 2005 by Redwood Trust, Inc., a
Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and the undersigned officer of the Company (the “Executive”).



          WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to the [Amended and Restated] Employment
Agreement, dated as of
                    
        ,
200_  (the “Agreement”); and



          WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to comply with the recently enacted Internal
Revenue Code Section 409A deferred compensation rules that require certain separation from service
payments to specified employees be made no earlier than the date that is six months after the date
of the employee’s separation from service.



          NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree that,
notwithstanding any provision of the Agreement to the contrary:



          (a) All severance payments provided under the Agreement in connection with the termination of
the employment of the Executive shall be payable in an amount equal to 75% of such payments on the
date that is six months after the termination date, and the remaining 25% shall be payable in six
equal monthly installments beginning on the date that is seven months after the termination date
and continuing on the same date of each of the five months thereafter.



          (b) All bonus payments provided under the Agreement in connection with the termination of the
employment of the Executive shall be payable on the date that is six months after the termination
date.



 









 





          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has executed this Amendment as of the date set
forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EXECUTIVE
	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	REDWOOD TRUST, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:	 	 
	 

	 	Title: