alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCEPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-10 (the Trust) I, Nancy H. Forte, a duly elected and acting officer of Citibank, N.A. (Indenture Trustee),
do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that: 1. I have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the application of
trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section
6.06 of the Indenture pursuant to which the Trusts notes were issued during the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004 (the Relevant Year); and 2. Based upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance, dated March 15, 2005,
prepared by the Ernst & Young LLP substantially in accordance with Section 4.05 of the Expense and
Indemnity Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the application of trust money collected by the
Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture was
performed in accordance with the terms of the Indenture throughout the Relevant Year. CITIBANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee By:
    /s/ Nancy H. ForteName:
    Nancy H. ForteTitle:
    Assistant Vice President Date: March 29, 2005
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTIAN CABRERA

- SAMAYOA,

Petitioner,

v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 70806 Agency No. A205

- 599

- 995

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 3, 2020 * *
Before: MURGUIA, CHRISTEN, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Christian Cabrera

- Samayoa , a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal , and relief under the Convent ion Against Torture (“CAT”).
Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny in part and dismiss in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 11 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 70806

part the petition for review.
Cabrera

- Samayoa does not make any arguments challenging the agency’s dispositive conclusion that his asylum application was untimely

. See Lopez

Vasquez v. Holder , 706 F.3d 1072, 1079

- 80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brie f are waived)

. We do not consider
Cabrera

- Samayoa ’s contentions as to the merits of his asylum claim because the
BIA did not decide that issue

. See Santiago

- Rodriguez v. Holder , 657 F.3d 820, 829 (9th Cir. 2011) ( review limited to the grounds relied on by the agency )

. Thus, we deny the petition for review as to asylum. The agency denied withholding of removal because Cabrera

- Samayoa failed
to establish a nexus between his political opinion or particular social gro up. Cabrera

- Samayoa does not challenge that determination. See Lopez

- Vasquez , 706
F.3d at 1079

- 80

. Thus, we deny the petition for review as to withholding of
removal. We lack jurisdiction to consider Cabrera

- Samayoa’s unexhausted contention
that members hip in his family constitutes a protected ground for purposes of withholding of removal. See Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 677

- 78 (9th Cir. 2004).
To the extent Cabrera

- Samayoa challenges the denial of CAT relief , w e lack jurisdiction to consider these unexhausted contentions

. See id. at 677

- 78.3 19

- 70806

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part
.
CERTIFICATIONS                                                      Exhibit 31.1

I, Daniel P. Beharry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mera Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the Company, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
          procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
          the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
          and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
          controls; and

6. The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:   March 21, 2005

/s/DANIEL P. BEHARRY
----------------------------------------
Daniel P. Beharry
Chief Executive Officer





                                       11
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1988-A, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 1998 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         55,487
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  707
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               56,194
<PP&E>                                         4,167,518
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,778,341)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 445,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,428
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     438,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   445,371
<SALES>                                        12,129
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               12,929
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,925<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,697)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,697)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,697)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes gene al and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32 .1





Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Imagenetix, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William P.
Spencer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
      February 18, 2011
              s/WILLIAM P. SPENCERWilliam
      P. SpencerChief
      Executive Officer and
President
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

METROPOLITAN MORTGAGE & SECURITIES CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES COMPUTATION OF RATIO 
OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK  DIVIDENDS

	The ratio of adjusted earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends was 
computed using the following tabulations to compute adjusted earnings and the 
defined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends.
			Year Ended
			September 30
			(Dollars in Thousands)
	1996	1995	1994	1993	1992
<S>	<C>    	<C>    	<C>    	<C>    	<C>    
Income (loss) before extra-
	ordinary item................	$ 8,038	$6,303	$ 5,478	$8,303	$ 2,927
Add:
	Interest.....................	18,788	16,381	19,895	19,442	21,299
	Taxes (benefit) on income....	4,235	3,108	4,422	1,871	213
Adjusted Earnings...............	$31,061	$25,792	$28,365	$32,167	$26,097



Preferred stock dividend require-
	ments........................	$3,868	$ 4,038	$ 3,423	$3,313	$ 3,399
Ratio factor of income after
	provision for income taxes to
	income before provision for
	income taxes.................	66%	67%	66%	66%	64%
Preferred stock dividend factor on
	pretax basis.................	5,880	6,006	5,220	5,020	5,311
Fixed Charges
	Interest.....................	18,788	16,381	19,895	19,442	21,299
	Capitalized Interest.........	2,468	2,730	2,152	3,013	270
	Fixed charges and preferred
	stock dividends.............	$27,136	$25,117	$27,267	$27,475	$26,880
Ratio of Adjusted Earnings to
	Fixed Charges and Preferred
	Stock Dividends..............		   1.14		1.03		1.04			1.17			.97
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1



Certification



I, Glenn M. Dobbs, certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Mines Management, Inc.



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 28, 2005



/s/ Glenn M. Dobbs

Glenn M. Dobbs

President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 72214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28566]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Workforce Investment Act; Native American Employment and Training 
Council, Meeting

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of 
Labor.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (FACA) (Public Law 92-463), as amended, and Section 166(h)(4) of 
the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) [29 U.S.C. 2911(h)(4)], notice is 
hereby given of the next meeting of the Native American Employment and 
Training Council (Council), as constituted under WIA.

DATES: The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. (Eastern Standard Time) on 
Wednesday, December 17, 2014, and continue until 5:00 p.m., that day. 
The meeting will reconvene at 9:00 a.m. on Thursday, December 18, 2014, 
and adjourn at 5:00 p.m., that day. The period from 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 
p.m., on December 17, 2014, will be reserved for participation and 
comment by members of the public.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 
Postal Square Building, 2 Massachusetts Ave. NE., Washington DC 20212, 
in the conference center, Rooms 7 and 8.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public. 
Members of the public not present may submit a written statement on or 
before December 10, 2014, to be included in the record of the meeting. 
Statements are to be submitted to Ms. Athena R. Brown, Designated 
Federal Officer (DFO), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 
Avenue NW., Room S-4209, Washington, DC 20210. Persons who need special 
accommodations should contact Mr. Craig Lewis at (202) 693-3384, at 
least two business days before the meeting. The formal agenda will 
focus on the following topics: (1) U.S. Department of Labor, Employment 
and Training Administration Update and the Workforce Innovation and 
Opportunity Act of 2014; (2) Training and Technical Assistance; (3) 
Council and Workgroup Updates and Recommendations; (4) New Business and 
Next Steps; and (5) Public Comment.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Athena R. Brown, DFO, Division of 
Indian and Native American Programs, Employment and Training 
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room S-4209, 200 Constitution 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. Telephone number (202) 693-3737 
(VOICE) (this is not a toll-free number).

Portia Wu,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-28566 Filed 12-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4501-FR-P
El Sistema de Gestión de Calidad en que se apoyan los servicios 

de medición, según se define en una moción del Grupo de 

Trabajo del Sistema de Calidad (QSTF), ha sido revisado y se 

ha determinado que cumple con los requisitos de ISO/IEC 

17025:2017 y ISO 17034:2016, bajo mandato del Sistema 

Interamericano de Metrología en apoyo de las expectativas del 

Acuerdo de Reconocimiento Mutuo del CIPM.

Georgette Macdonald, Quality System Task Force Chair

Claire Saundry, President, SIM

APROBACIÓN DEL SISTEMA DE 

GESTIÓN DE LA CALIDAD

APPROVAL OF 

QUALITY MANAGEMENT 

SYSTEM 

National Institute of Standards and Technology – The United States of 

America 

Optical Properties of Materials – Fluorescence

The Quality Management System supporting measurement 

services, as defined in a motion of the Quality System Task 

Force (QSTF), has been reviewed and found to be in 

conformance with the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2017 

and ISO 17034:2016, under the mandate of the Inter-American 

Metrology System in support of the expectations of the CIPM 

Mutual Recognition Arrangement.

Approval date: 24 September 2019

Expiration date: 24 September 2024
#### M. H. Ringo *v.*J. G. Ford.

Landlord and Tenant — Lien—Crops Raised by Sub-Tenants.

A landlord has a lien on crops raised by sub-tenants to secure thé rent, and they have no right to reserve the crops, and if they do so, they should be regarded as the agents of the original tenant.

Parties — Sub-Tenants—Action for Rent.

In an action by a landlord for rent, it is not necessary to make sub-tenants parties.

APPEAL PROM DAYIESS CIRCUIT COURT.

March 7, 1874.

*562
      *Sweeney, for appellant.*

*Owen & ElKs, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The land was rented by the appellant, M'rs. Ringo, to the appel-lee, and he rented it to his father, M. S. Ford, and Rolley Davies. He agreed, when the contract was made, to execute his note for the rent; this he declined to do, for the reason that the land was not surveyed. When the survey was made he declined to execute the note for the reason that he had rented the land' to his father and Davies.

They declined to execute a note or pay, as they had rented of Ford. No note was ever executed or money paid, and the appel-lee now insists that he could not have recovered the property, or have been about to do so, as all the crop on the place belonged to the subtenants. Mrs. Ringo had a lien on the crop' for her rent, and the act of the subtenants with reference to the crop, was that of the original tenant. They had no right to reserve the crop, and if they, did, so far as Mrs. Ringo was concerned, they are to be regarded as the agents of her tenant.

It was not necessary to make these subtenants parties. A proceeding against John Ford was proper and the only legitimate mode of making her rent. These subtenants executed a claimant’s bond, and took the property after it had been levied on. Neither of these subtenants have any estate. The appellee owns a horse and buggy only. The crop has all been consumed by these parties, and not one dollar of the rent paid. If these facts do' not demonstrate the truth of Mrs. Ringo’s statement that she was about to' lose her rent, it would be difficult to present a case in which such an apprehension could be well founded. The judgment is reversed with directions to sustain the attachment, and for further proceedings consistent herewith.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60279 Conference Calendar

PATRICK L. HIGGINS, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus STATE OF MISSISSIPPI; STEVE W. PUCKETT, Defendants, STEVE W. PUCKETT, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:96cv46OLN

- - - - - - - - - - December 10, 1997 Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Patrick J. Higgins, Sr., Mississippi prisoner # 53197, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Higgins argues that the assessment of fees for nonemergency medical services pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 47-5- 179 (West Supp. 1996) violates his rights under the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. Because neither theNo. 97-60279 -2- assessment of medical fees nor the nonpayment of the medical fees would affect the length of Higgins’ confinement, Higgins has not shown that the application of the new statute violated his rights under the Ex Post Facto Clause. See Lynce v. Mathis , 117 S. Ct. 891, 896 (1997)(a law violates the Ex Post Facto Clause if it is retrospective and disadvantages the offender by altering the definition of criminal conduct or by increasing punishment for offense). AFFIRMED.
iv

List of Symbols 

h enthalpy, kJ/kg 

p pressure, MPa 

s entropy, kJ/(kg·K) 

t temperature, degrees Celsius 

v volume, cm3

/g 

Subscripts

L liquid at saturation 

V vapor at saturation 

s saturation 

Greek Letters

∆ property change on vaporization 

ρ density, kg/m3