alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4349 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4349

         To reinstate Department of Energy Order No. 202-03-2.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2004

  Mr. Bishop of New York (for himself and Mr. Israel) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To reinstate Department of Energy Order No. 202-03-2.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CROSS SOUND CABLE ORDER.

     Notwithstanding Department of Energy Order No. 202-03-4, issued by 
the Secretary of Energy on May 7, 2004, or any other provision of law, 
Department of Energy Order No. 202-03-2, issued by the Secretary of 
Energy on August 28, 2003, is reinstated effective on the date of 
enactment of this Act and shall remain in effect unless rescinded by 
Act of Congress.
                                 <all>
```
10763.

#### Fordham *v.*The State.

Decided November 5, 1919.

Indictment for murder—conviction of manslaughter; from Bleckley superior court—Judge Graham. June 21, 1919.

*J. M. Bleckley, M. II. Boyer,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. A. Woolen, solicitor-general,*contra.

Luke, J.

1. It appearing from some of the evidence in this case that immediately preceding the killing the deceased and the defendant had a quarrel and a tussle and cursed each other, that each procured a pistol, and that the deceased, with his hand on a pistol in his pocket, was advancing on the defendant when the defendant shot and killed him, the jury were authorized to infer a mutual intent to fight, and the court did not err in giving in charge to the jury the law of voluntary manslaughter.

2. The court did not err as complained of, in excluding certain evidence. For no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial. *Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, G. J., and Bloodicorth, J., concur.*
### Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(r eleased the week prior to January 4, 2022 

### )

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES :



### None Available

The above

- listed memorandum opinions c an be viewed online through the

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebra ska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/

.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

http s ://www.nebraska.gov/courts/s c cales/

.
Measurement Science and Engineering (MSE) 

FY2019 Financial Assistance Awards

Measurement Science and Engineering (MSE) Research Grant Program Updated 10/8/2019

Recipient Title

Funding 

FY 2019

Total

Award

American National 

Standards Institute (ANSI) Secretariat for ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 37, Biometrics 45,683 45,683

Carnegie Mellon 

University

Categorical modeling language for modeling, 

analysis and verification in Complex Systems 

Engineering 225,643 225,643

Computing Technology 

Industry Association Inc.

Refining CyberSeek Cybersecurity Demand 

Maps and Career Pathways 176,700 509,700

Dublin City University

Development of Evaluation Metrics for 

Descriptive Video Captioning 21,197 21,197

Michigan State University On the Study of Bias in Face Recognition 146,013 146,013

National Academy of 

Sciences

Opportunities for Measurement Science 

Research to Advance the Trustworthiness of AI 

Systems 149,068 149,068

National Cyber Security 

Alliance

Proposal to develop a series of five small 

business case studies to contextualize 

important cybersecurity topics within realworld scenarios to promote awareness among 

this vulnerable population. 40,018 40,018

Pennsylvania State 

University – Univ Park

Deep Science –Artificial Intelligence and 

Machine Learning in HealthcareMethodologies and Standards for Trust and 

Explanation 89,888 311,258

Prometheus Computing 

LLC

Security, Resiliency and Dynamics of 

Interdependent Self-Organizing Networks 114,332 172,019

University of Central 

Florida Board of Trustees

Improve factors to enhanced phishing 

susceptibility through experiments designed to 

examine the influence of individual traits and 

techniques in phishing emails. 49,936 49,936

University of Maryland

Foundations for Next-Generation 

Cryptographic Standards 295,792 600,000
EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 33-28045,  33-65140,  333-28395 and 333-57873)  pertaining to the
1988 Joint Incentive and Non-Qualified  Stock Option Plan and the 1988 Incentive
Stock Option Plan of United Capital Corp. of our report dated February 11, 2000,
with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements and schedules of United
Capital  Corp.  included in the Annual  Report (Form 10-K) for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1999.


                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


New York, NY
March 14, 2000
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4
 
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
report dated June 4, 1998, on the financial statements of S-Sixteen Holding
Company and Subsidiaries, included or made a part of this Registration Statement
of Remington Oil and Gas Corporation (formerly Box Energy Corporation), on Form
S-4, and to all references to our firm included in this document.
 
                                            ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Dallas, Texas
August 14, 1998
**Exhibit
        23.1**
  
  **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
   We
        hereby
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
        Form
        S-3 (No. 33-11717) of Middlesex Water Company of our reports dated March
        13, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and
        the
        effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ,
        which
        appear in this Form 10-K.
  /s/
        Beard
        Miller Company LLP
 Beard
        Miller Company LLP
 Reading,
        Pennsylvania
 March 13,
        2007
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Siebert Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Joseph M. Ramos, Jr., in my capacity as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report
filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the report.

|                          |  |                      
|------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|/s/ Joseph
 M. Ramos, Jr. |  | Date: March
 31, 2010
|                          |  |                      
|Joseph M.
 Ramos, Jr.     |  |                      
|Chief Financial
 Officer  |  |                      

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by section 906, has been provided to Siebert Financial Corp. and will be
retained by Siebert Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             936
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                       515
<INVENTORY>                                        526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,732
<PP&E>                                           1,290
<DEPRECIATION>                                     632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,359
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,625
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,191
<SALES>                                          1,217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,217
<CGS>                                              850
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (786)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (786)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1



                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1







             [AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, L.L.P. LETTERHEAD]


                                  May 27, 1998


Advance Paradigm, Inc.
545 East John Carpenter Freeway
Suite 1570
Irving, Texas 75062

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We have acted as counsel to Advance Paradigm, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the proposed registration of
876,078 shares of the Company's common stock, $.01 par value (the "Common
Stock"), as described in a registration statement on Form S-3 (the "Registration
Statement"), which Registration Statement is to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

         We have, as counsel, examined such corporate records, certificates and
other documents and reviewed such questions of law as we have deemed necessary,
relevant or appropriate to enable us to render the opinions listed below. In
rendering such opinions, we have assumed the genuineness of all signatures and
the authenticity of all documents examined by us. As to various questions of
fact material to such opinions, we have relied upon representations of the
Company.

         Based upon such examination and representations, we advise you that, in
our opinion:

         A. The shares of Common Stock which are to be registered pursuant to
the Registration Statement have been duly and validly authorized by the Company.

         B. The shares of Common Stock which are to be registered pursuant to
the Registration Statement have been validly issued, are fully paid and are
non-assessable.

         The foregoing opinion is limited to the corporate laws of the State of
Delaware, and we express no opinion as to the effect on the matters covered by
this letter of any other law.


<PAGE>   2



         We consent to the reference to this firm in the Registration Statement
and to the filing of this opinion as Exhibit 5.1 to the Registration Statement.

         This opinion is rendered solely to you in connection with the above
matter. This opinion may not be relied upon by you for any other purpose or
relied upon by or furnished to any other person without our prior written
consent.


                                      Sincerely,



                                      AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, L.L.P.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4528 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4528

 To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign the face of $10 
 Federal reserve notes so as to include a likeness of President Ronald 
                 Wilson Reagan, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2004

 Mr. Hayworth introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign the face of $10 
 Federal reserve notes so as to include a likeness of President Ronald 
                 Wilson Reagan, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``President Ronald Reagan $10 Bill 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LIKENESS OF PRESIDENT REAGAN REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED ON THE 
              FACE OF $10 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES.

    The 8th undesignated paragraph of section 16 of the Federal Reserve 
Act (12 U.S.C. 418) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence: ``The face of $10 Federal reserve notes printed after 
December 31, 2004, shall bear the likeness of President Ronald Wilson 
Reagan''.
                                 <all>
```
[ J

- 84

- 2021 ] [MO: Todd, J. ]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

DR. AHLAM KHALIL,

Appellant

v.

GERALD J. WILLIAMS ESQUIRE; BETH COLE ESQUIRE; WILLIAMS CUKER BEREZOFSKY, LLC,

Appellees :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 24 EAP 2021

Appeal from the Judgment of Superior Court entered on January
5, 2021 at No. 2549 EDA 2019, affirming in part, reversing in part and remanding the Order entered on July 12, 2019 in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Civil Division at No. 0825 May Term, 2013.

ARGUED: December 8, 2021

CONCURRING O PINION

JUSTICE MUNDY DECIDED: July 20, 2022

I join the result reached by the majority. With that said, I am also aligned with

Justice Wecht’s view that the rule announced in Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna,

Messer, Shilobod & Gutnick , 587 A.2d 1346 (Pa. 1991), should be disapproved , and that

the present dispute offers a convenient vehicle to do so . While discouraging litigation

based on a mere desire to obtain more money the second time around has some appeal,

as Justice Wecht notes the jurisdictions which have rejected a Muhammad

- type rule have

not been overburdened by those types of lawsuits. M ore fundamentally , t here does not

seem to be any reason injured client s should be barred from recovery if they can prove

negligence, damages, and proximate causation, as in any other tort case

.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0343 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. WILLIAM JAMES HARNING ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until November 29 , 202 1 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 19 2021

10/19/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0343
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-7-1996
<CASH>                                           1,250
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,237
<ALLOWANCES>                                       587
<INVENTORY>                                     47,155
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,145
<PP&E>                                         205,221
<DEPRECIATION>                                  92,326
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,367
<BONDS>                                        287,708
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     32,961
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205,877
<SALES>                                        539,568
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               539,568
<CGS>                                          414,372
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  414,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               110,360
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,717)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,717)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,717)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4556 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4556

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1115 South Clinton Avenue in Dunn, North Carolina, as the ``General 
               William Carey Lee Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2004

  Mr. Etheridge (for himself, Mr. Burr, Mr. Coble, Mr. McIntyre, Mr. 
 Hayes, Mr. Miller of North Carolina, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. Taylor of North 
  Carolina, Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Price of 
North Carolina, and Mr. Watt) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1115 South Clinton Avenue in Dunn, North Carolina, as the ``General 
               William Carey Lee Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GENERAL WILLIAM CAREY LEE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1115 South Clinton Avenue in Dunn, North Carolina, shall be 
known and designated as the ``General William Carey Lee Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the General 
William Carey Lee Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Millipore Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, Martin D. Madaus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kathleen B.
Allen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/    MARTIN D.
MADAUS*

Martin D. Madaus

President and Chief Executive Officer

February 28, 2007

/s/    KATHLEEN B. ALLEN*

Kathleen B. Allen

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

February 28, 2007



---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Millipore Corporation and will be retained by Millipore Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10539.

#### Commercial Bank of Jasper *v.*Dasher.

Decided February 7, 1920.

Levy and claim; from city court of Yaldosta—Judge Cranford. March 21, 1919.

*Dan R. Bruce, E. X. Wilcox,*for plaintiff in error.

*Whitaker & Dukes,*contra.

Jenkins, P. J.

Instructions not authorized by the pleadings or evidence, even though presenting correct principles of law, should not be given; and if by the instructions the jury might reasonably be drawn away from the true issues in dispute to the prejudice of parties, the giving in charge of such inapplicable principles would be reversible error *(Long*v. *Gilbert,*133 *Ga.*691, 69, 66 S. E. 894; *Lazenby*v. *Citizens Bank,*20 *Ga. App. 53,*59 (5), 72 S. E. 391); but where, as in this case, the irrelevant charge could not reasonably be said to have possibly prejudiced the rights, of the complaining party, and could not have misled the jury from the true issue involved, and where too the evidence demanded a finding that the property in dispute belonged to the claimant, the mere fact that the judge gave instructions as to what would be the legal effect, in case the jury should believe the property was owned by the claimant and the defendant in fi. fa. jointly and as partners, would not authorize setting aside the verdict as demanded in favor of the claimant. See cases cited in 7 Ency. Dig. Ga. Rep. 656 (c).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.*