72624 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 235 / Monday, December 8, 2014 / Notices 

1See the Memorandum from Gary Taverman, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Decision 

Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip 

from the United Arab Emirates’’ (Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with 

this notice. 

2On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

LIST OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY EDA FOR CERTIFICATION ELIGIBILITY TO APPLY FOR TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE

[11/19/2014 through 12/2/2014] 

Firm name Firm address Date accepted 

for investigation Product(s) 

KRL Bantry Components, Inc ................ 160 Bouchard Street, Manchester, NH 

03103.

11/19/2014 The firm manufactures standard and 

custom precision wire-wound resistors. 

Skyline Exhibits & Graphics, Inc ............ 362 Industrial Park Road, 6 Great River 

Center, Middletown, CT 06457.

11/19/2014 The firm manufactures trade show exhibits and graphics. 

L&H Industrial, Inc .................................. 913 L&J Court, Gillette, WY 82718 ....... 11/19/2014 The firm manufactures parts for mining 

equipment. 

Bay Motor Products, Inc ......................... 3100 Cass Road, Traverse City, MI 

49684.

11/19/2014 The firm small electric motors for moving air. 

Any party having a substantial 

interest in these proceedings may 

request a public hearing on the matter. 

A written request for a hearing must be 

submitted to the Trade Adjustment 

Assistance for Firms Division, Room 

71030, Economic Development 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no 

later than ten (10) calendar days 

following publication of this notice. 

Please follow the requirements set 

forth in EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR 

315.9 for procedures to request a public 

hearing. The Catalog of Federal 

Domestic Assistance official number 

and title for the program under which 

these petitions are submitted is 11.313, 

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. 

Dated: December 2, 2014. 

Michael S. DeVillo, 

Eligibility Examiner. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28710 Filed 12–5–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–520–803] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip From the United Arab 

Emirates; Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, 

and strip (PET Film) from the United 

Arab Emirates (UAE). The period of 

review (POR) is November 1, 2012, 

through October 31, 2013. The review 

covers one producer/exporter of the 

subject merchandise, JBF RAK LLC 

(JBF). The Department preliminarily 

determines that sales of subject 

merchandise have been made below 

normal value by JBF. Interested parties 

are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 8, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4261. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

all gauges of raw, pre-treated, or primed 

polyethylene terephthalate film, 

whether extruded or co-extruded. 

Excluded are metallized films and other 

finished films that have had at least one 

of their surfaces modified by the 

application of a performance-enhancing 

resinous or inorganic layer more than 

0.00001 inches thick. Also excluded is 

roller transport cleaning film which has 

at least one of its surfaces modified by 

application of 0.5 micrometers of SBR 

latex. Tracing and drafting film is also 

excluded. Polyethylene terephthalate 

film is classifiable under subheading 

3920.62.00.90 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 

While HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes, 

our written description of the scope of 

the order is dispositive. 

Methodology 

The Department is conducting this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). Export price is 

calculated in accordance with section 

772 of the Act. Normal value is 

calculated in accordance with section 

773 of the Act. For a full description of 

the methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum, which is hereby 

adopted by this notice.1 The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).2

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and in the 

Central Records Unit in Room 7046 of 

the main Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly on the Internet at 

http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The 

signed Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum and electronic versions of 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

are identical in content. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

As a result of our review, we 

preliminarily determine the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 

exist for the period November 1, 2012, 

through October 31, 2013: 

Manufacturer/ 

Exporter 

Weighted-average 

margin 

(percent) 

JBF RAK LLC ........... 9.02 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

The Department intends to disclose 

the calculations used in our analysis to 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 235 / Monday, December 8, 2014 / Notices 72625 

3See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). 

4See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2). 

5See id. 

6See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

7 In these preliminary results, the Department 

applied the assessment rate calculation 

methodology adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: 

Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping 

Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain 

Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 

FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). 

8See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 

Strip from Brazil, the People’s Republic of China 

and the United Arab Emirates: Antidumping Duty 

Orders and Amended Final Determination of Sales 

at Less Than Fair Value for the United Arab 

Emirates, 73 FR 66595, 66597 (November 10, 2008). 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 79392 

(December 30, 2013) (Initiation Notice). 

parties in this review within five days 

of the date of publication of this notice 

in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on the preliminary results of 

this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may 

submit case briefs not later than 30 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues 

raised in the case briefs, may not be 

filed later than five days after the time 

limit for filing case briefs.3 Parties who 

submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in 

this review are requested to submit with 

each brief: (1) A statement of the issue, 

(2) a brief summary of the argument, 

and (3) a table of authorities.4 Executive 

summaries should be limited to five 

pages total, including footnotes.5

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), any 

interested party may request a hearing 

within 30 days of the publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. If a 

hearing is requested, the Department 

will notify interested parties of the 

hearing schedule. Interested parties who 

wish to request a hearing, or to 

participate if one is requested, must 

submit a written request to the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. Requests 

should contain: (1) The party’s name, 

address, and telephone number; (2) the 

number of participants; and (3) a list of 

the issues to be discussed. Issues raised 

in the hearing will be limited to those 

raised in the respective case briefs. 

We intend to issue the final results of 

this administrative review, including 

the results of our analysis of issues 

raised by the parties in the written 

comments, within 120 days of 

publication of these preliminary results 

in the Federal Register, unless 

otherwise extended.6

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuing the final results of the 

review, the Department shall determine, 

and U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries. The 

Department intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of the final results of 

review. 

For any individually examined 

respondents whose weighted-average 

dumping margin is above de minimis, 

we will calculate importer-specific ad 

valorem duty assessment rates based on 

the ratio of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the importer’s examined 

sales to the total entered value of those 

same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).7 We will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review when the importer-specific 

assessment rate calculated in the final 

results of this review is above de 

minimis. Where either the respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis, or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

The final results of this review shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of 

PET Film from the UAE entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided for 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for the companies 

under review will be the rate 

established in the final results of this 

review (except, if the rate is zero or de 

minimis, no cash deposit will be 

required); (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not listed above, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the less-thanfair-value investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent period for the manufacturer of 

the merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other manufacturers 

or exporters will continue to be 4.05 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the investigation.8 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

These preliminary results of 

administrative review are issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: December 1, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Date of Sale 

5. Discussion of Methodology 

6. Product Comparisons 

7. Export Price and Constructed Export Price 

8. Normal Value 

9. Cost of Production Analysis 

10. Currency Conversion 

[FR Doc. 2014–28691 Filed 12–5–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–831] 

Fresh Garlic From the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results 

of the Nineteenth Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Department) is conducting the 

nineteenth administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on fresh garlic 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(PRC) covering the period of review 

(POR) November 1, 2012, through 

October 31, 2013.1 We preliminary 

determine that the two mandatory 

respondents in this review, Hebei 

Golden Bird Trading Co., Ltd. (Golden 

Bird) and Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES