alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,413
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,013
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,317
<PP&E>                                         281,738
<DEPRECIATION>                                 110,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,156
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,465
<BONDS>                                         49,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,180
<OTHER-SE>                                      97,314
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,156
<SALES>                                         27,286
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,354
<CGS>                                           12,297
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   960
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,510
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,999
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,511
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,511
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.67


</TABLE>
FINAL by: OSAC Program Office; Version 2, December 1, 2020 1

OSAC RESEARCH NEEDS ASSESSMENT FORM

Title of research need: Understanding cognitive bias in DVI operations

Keyword(s): Disaster victim identification, mass fatality, cognitive bias

Submitting subcommittee(s): MDI Date Approved: 2/28/2021

(If SAC review identifies additional subcommittees, add them to the box above.)

Background Information:

1. Does this research need address a gap(s) in a current or planned standard? (ex.: Field identification system 

for on scene opioid detection and confirmation)

No.

2. Are you aware of any ongoing research that may address this research need that has not yet been published 

(e.g., research presented in conference proceedings, studies that you or a colleague have participated in but 

have yet to be published)?

No.

3. Key bibliographic references relating to this research need: (ex.: Toll, L., Standifer, K. M., Massotte, D., eds. 

(2019). Current Topics in Opioid Research. Lausanne: Frontiers Media SA. doi: 10.3389/978-2-88963-180-3)

None.

4. Review the annual operational/research needs published by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) at 

https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/forensic-science-research-and-development-technology-working-groupoperational#latest? Is your research need identified by NIJ?

No.

5. In what ways would the research results improve current laboratory capabilities?

Understanding the presence (and extent) of cognitive bias and its potential impact on postmortem processing of 

human remains and victim identification is essential for developing strategies to mitigate any negative impact of 

bias. There is a lack of understanding of the degree of cognitive bias that may be associated with high 

throughput disaster victim identification operations. There are two closely associated research needs: 

• Determine if cognitive bias exists in current DVI operations 

• Develop effective mitigation strategies 
FINAL by: OSAC Program Office; Version 2, December 1, 2020 2

6. In what ways would the research results improve understanding of the scientific basis for the 

subcommittee(s)?

The subcommittee will benefit from this research by enhancing the DVI community’s understanding of the role 

and extent of cognitive bias in DVI operations. With these research results, the subcommittee can develop 

standards and best practices to support medicolegal jurisdictions in their attempts to reduce the introduction 

and limit the effects of cognitive bias in DVI management.

7. In what ways would the research results improve services to the criminal justice system?

Implement additional protective and quality assurance measures to reduce or eliminate cognitive bias in 

disaster victim identification.

8. Status assessment (I, II, III, or IV):

I Major gap in 

current 

knowledge

Minor gap in 

current 

knowledge

No or limited

current research is 

being conducted I III

Existing current 

research is being 

conducted II IV

This research need has been identified by one or more subcommittees of OSAC and is being provided as an 

informational resource to the community.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(b)
                                                           ALLETE 2006 Form 10-K

                           CONSENT OF GENERAL COUNSEL

The statements of law and legal conclusions under "Item 1. Business" in ALLETE's
Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year  ended  December  31,  2006,  have been
reviewed  by me and are set forth  therein  in  reliance  upon my  opinion as an
expert.

I hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such statements of law and
legal  conclusions  in  Registration  Statement  Nos.  333-02109,  333-41882 and
333-57104 on Form S-3, and  Registration  Statement Nos.  333-16445,  333-16463,
333-82901, 333-91348, 333-105225 and 333-124455 on Form S-8.

Deborah A. Amberg

Deborah A. Amberg
Duluth, Minnesota
February 15, 2007
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2009 

p0720 

Order 

 

August 6, 2009 

137836 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137836 

 COA: 285580 

Wayne CC: 01-010970-FC 

NATHAN JONES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 15, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23.




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed Form S-8
Registration Statement File No. 333-34999.



Dallas, Texas,                                    ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
June 22, 1998
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
<TABLE>
ALLETE
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES (UNAUDITED)
<CAPTION>


FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31                                     2006         2005       2004        2003         2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MILLIONS EXCEPT RATIOS
<S>                                                               <C>          <C>        <C>         <C>          <C>
Income from Continuing Operations
       Before Minority Interest and Income Taxes                  $128.2       $19.8      $ 57.0      $ 49.5       $ 37.9
Less:  Minority Interest <F1>                                          -           -         2.1         2.6          1.0
       Undistributed Income from Less than 50%
          Owned Equity Investment                                    2.3           -           -         2.9          4.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                   125.9        19.8        54.9        44.0         32.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fixed Charges
       Interest on Long-Term Debt                                   22.2        23.1        60.3        70.0         73.9
       Capitalized Interest                                          0.6         0.3         0.7         1.2          0.8
       Other Interest Charges                                        5.3         3.5         8.7         4.3          5.3
       Interest Component of All Rentals                             2.0         2.8         3.5         8.0          9.9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

             Total Fixed Charges                                    30.1        29.7        73.2        83.5         89.9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Earnings Before Income Taxes and Fixed Charges
       (Excluding Capitalized Interest)                           $155.4       $49.2      $127.4      $126.3       $121.3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                  5.16        1.66        1.74        1.51         1.35
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
<F1> Pre-tax income of subsidiaries that have not incurred fixed charges.
</FN>
</TABLE>


97                                                         ALLETE 2006 Form 10-K
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                      (2,452)
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               22,374
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            19,922
<PP&E>                                                      31,579
<DEPRECIATION>                                             (20,705)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             607,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      936,575
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                     3,469
<OTHER-SE>                                                (329,245)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               607,330
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 0
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               23,425
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             3,660
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (27,085)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (27,085)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (0.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (0.001)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION


I, JOHN P. GRAZER, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
 periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Ameriquest
 Mortgage Securities, Inc. 2004-R5:

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling
and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion is included in these
reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement and based upon my
knowledge and the annual compliance required under that agreement, and except
as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
report provided by and independent public account, after conducting a review
in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company.

<page>



Date: March 1, 2005

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC.


/s/: John P Grazer
John P Grazer
CFO
Exhibit 23
                                                                               
                                                                               
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                                       
                                       
      As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
   incorporation by reference of our report dated January 13, 1998,
   included in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, into
   Michigan Bell Telephone Company's previously filed Registration
   Statement File No. 33-51169.
   
      
      
      
      
   
   
   
   ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
   
   
   Chicago, Illinois
   March 12, 1998
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6057

WARREN MATTHEW GIDDINGS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (1:21-cv-00959-GJH)

Submitted: April 26, 2022 Decided: April 29, 2022

Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Warren Matthew Giddings, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Warren Matthew Giddings appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Giddings v. 

Montgomery Cnty., No. 1:21-cv-00959-GJH (D. Md. Dec. 15, 2021). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4318 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4318

 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require institutions of 
  higher education to widely distribute information describing their 
   procedures for receiving and responding to complaints concerning 
                              harassment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2004

  Mr. Weiner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require institutions of 
  higher education to widely distribute information describing their 
   procedures for receiving and responding to complaints concerning 
                              harassment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sexual Harrassment Reporting and 
Posting Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. HARASSMENT PROCEDURE DISCLOSURES REQUIRED.

    Section 485 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1092) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(h) Harassment Procedure Disclosures Required.--Each eligible 
institution participating in any program under this title shall carry 
out appropriate and reasonable information dissemination activities for 
prospective and enrolled students (including those attending or 
planning to attend less than full time) regarding the procedures 
established by such institution for receiving and responding to 
complaints regarding sexual harassment. Such dissemination activities 
shall include--
            ``(1) distribution to enrolled students (along with the 
        distribution of information concerning enrollment in the 
        institution) of information--
                    ``(A) identifying the acts that constitute sexual 
                harassment;
                    ``(B) stating that sexual harassment is illegal; 
                and
                    ``(C) describing the procedures to be followed to 
                file a sexual harassment complaint and to receive 
                services and assistance for the victim; and
            ``(2) posting of the information described in paragraph (1) 
        through bulletins widely distributed among the buildings, 
        classrooms, student unions, and other facilities on the campus 
        of such institution.''.
                                 <all>
```
NIST PSCR RESEARCH INVESTMENTS BOLSTER 

DELAWARE’S ECONOMY 

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Public Safety 

Communications Research (PSCR) Division is the primary federal laboratory 

focused on conducting research, development, testing, and evaluation for 

public safety communications technologies. Their mission is to accelerate 

communications innovation in support of public safety communities and the 

citizens they serve. 

The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 allocated $300 Million 

from the Public Safety Trust fund to NIST PSCR to perform critical public safety 

communications R&D during a 10-year period. PSCR implemented numerous 

research mechanisms to support the development and deployment of the 

Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network: grants, Small Business Innovation 

Research (SBIR) contracts, prize challenge competitions, and internal research. 

These research mechanisms were housed within six research portfolios and crosscutting initiatives to maximize their impact: 

•	 User Interface/User Experience •	 Public Safety Analytics 

•	 Location-Based Services •	 Security 

•	 Mission Critical Voice •	 Resilient Systems 

While the ultimate impact of these research mechanisms is the increased safety 

of first responders and their communities through improved communications

technologies, PSCR was interested in better understanding how their R&D 

investments to date result in economic impacts that ripple outward to state 

economies. An independent analysis was conducted to demonstrate how PSCR’s 

deployment of the $300 Million from the Public Safety Trust Fund translated into 

broader impacts to the United States, including jobs, earnings, value added, and 

total economic output. PSCR’s R&D investments resulted in economic output 

in 33 of the 50 states. Results of the analysis are presented here. 

For more information, see NIST PSCR’s Economic Impact Study. 

1 Prize Challenge 

Participant 

Awards Totaling $0.02 Million 

DELAWARE BY THE NUMBERS 

NIST INVESTMENT 

$0.02 Million 

OUTPUT 

$0.04 Million 

VALUE-ADDED 

$0.03 Million 

EARNINGS 

$0.01 Million 

JOBS 

0 

Output: the total value of economic 

activity circulating through the U.S. 

economy generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Value-Added: how much the 

combined U.S. state economies 

grew over a period of time due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments 

Earnings: the change in household 

earnings in the U.S. economy 

generated by PSCR’s R&D 

investments 

Jobs: the change in the number of 

full- and part-time jobs generated 

by each one million dollar change 

in U.S. economic activity due to 

PSCR’s R&D investments 

*All dollar amounts presented 

in 2022 and reflect data as of 

October 2022.

**All values are rounded; thus, the 

sum of the components may not 

sum exactly to the NIST Investment 

amount.

For additional information of PSCR’s research programs, visit https://www.nist.gov/ctl/pscr.